HomeMy Public PortalAbout3237-1977- AUTHORIZING SPECIAL USE IN ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICTORDINANCE NO. 3237-1977
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A "SPECIAL USE" IN AN R-1 AND R-2 ONE -FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, OF ORDINANCE NO. 2325-1968, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, INDIANA, ADOPTED JUNE 3,
1968.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City of Richmond, Indiana,
as follows:
SECTION 1. As provided in Article 22, Section 22,01 and more speci-
fically provided in Article 48 of Ordinance No. 2325-1968, commonly
known as the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Richmond, Indiana, the
following described use of the following described real estate is
allowed as a Special Use for a Planned Unit Development for the con-
struction of twelve (12) units for elderly housing, at 109 Henley Road,
in the City of Richmond, Indiana; more particularly described, to wit:
Part of the northeast quarter of Section 3, Township
13 North, Range 1 West, bounded and described as
follows: Commencing at the south quarter stone of
Section 34, Township 14 North, Range I West and
running thence east 20 rods to an iron pin; thence
south 6.16 rods to a stake, thence west parallel
with the north line of Section 3 to the centerline
of said road to the north line of said Section 3;
thence east 4.01 rods, more or less to the place of
beginning, containing 1 acre more or less;
ALSO, a part of the southeast quarter of Section 34,
Township 14 North, Range 1 West, and commencing at
the southwest corner of said quarter; running thence
due east along the section line 20 rods; thence north
8 rods; thence west 20 rods; thence south 8 rods to
the place of beginning containing l acre.
SECTION 2. As a condition of the aforesaid Special Use and as an
additional restriction on said use, the following requirements
shall hereafter and at all times be met by the owner, leasee or
any person, firm or corporation using such real estate.
SECTION 3. WHEREAS, a study of this Ordinance was conducted by the
Richmond City Plan Commission the day of ,
1977, at which time remonstrances were heard from all parties interested
in or affected by this Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 3237-1977
Page 2
SECTION 4. WHEREAS, the vote of the Richmond City Plan Commission
was to in favor of/in opposition to recommending
the passage of Ordinance No. 3237-1977.
SECTION 5. The Planning Director of the City of Richmond, Indiana,
is hereby authorized and directed upon passage of this Ordinance,
to record and approve the issuance of an Improvement Location Per-
mit for the establishment of the use herein allowed.
SECTION b. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage and approval as by law required.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Richmond,
Indiana, this day of , 1977.
President of Common Council
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PRESENTED by me to the Mayor of the City of Richmond, Indiana, this
day of , 1977•
City Clerk
APPROVED by me, Clifford J. Dickman, Mayor of the City of Richmond,
Indiana, this day of , 1977.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
July 29, 1917
Mr. dames Gayter, PresideW
Nembprs of Campon VourAl
Mrs. do ElAn WNW, city
Municipal Building
Ridindinal VA'.
Re: Ordinanen No. 3237-1977 . plan Cmtolsmon A= 77-12,
Church of Wun Chr3t Latter W Sailts and WK A..
requesting a Special Use for a P13nned Unit Developwent
on prcperty located at 109 Henley Road
Bear Mr, Carter, Menbers of the Council and Mrs. Trimble,,
Tho Richnond City Flaoming Carvission hold a pohlic hearing n'',
Ordinance No. 3237-1977 on Tuesday, WY 26, 1517,
The Cummis%ioo 5nnt thirt)-three (33) letters to adjoining pro-
perty owners and received thirty-seven 117) back, all in UPPOsitiOn
to the proposed Unit Development projen.
Th2 Commission tilt there wert many qnestlon; Am the opevation
of a private hnusing association that were unanswered and the
fact that the Zoning Ordinance states Lhat a Unit DeVeWment
Project site be either zQned appropriately or that it be situated
in an area where it could be zoned for the une as proposed,
in this instanLe the Prow 2orinn classificnWon for the Pr-�
posed use would be RA Multi-Femily Residential. fhe Camnission
did not feel that thiVarea should he classified as Multi-Fam%
and voted eight (E) to zero (0) to deny the PeAtiOn.
Respectfully submitted,
DEPARTRENT OF C11Y PLANNING
Roburt B. WHY
Wcutive Secretary
plar K0705sion
.. ....... ..
e l t` T T