HomeMy Public PortalAboutORD15372 BILL NO. 2014-117
SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN Graham
ORDINANCE NO. I S 7 a--
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, APPROVING A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION SIGNAGE PLAN FOR A SUPERSTORE/BIG BOX RETAIL DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED IN THE 3600 BLOCK OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE 3700 BLOCK OF
WEST TRUMAN BOULEVARD, DESCRIBED AS PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION
FOUR AND PART OF SECTION NINE, TOWNSHIP 44 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST,
JEFFERSON CITY, COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI.
WHEREAS, Capital Mall JC LLC, owner/agent of the real estate hereinafter described, having
submitted an application for a Special Exception Use Permit Signage Plan for a
Superstore/Big Box Retail Development, located on land described as follows:
Part of the South Half of Section 4, and part of the Northeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter and part of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 9, all in Township 44 North, Range 12 W, in the City
of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri, more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter of said Section 9; thence S4°26'19"E, 760.31 feet to the
northerly line of Old U.S. Route No. 50 (now Country Club Drive); thence
S78°00'23"W, along the northerly right of way of Country Club Drive, 1413.73
feet to the most easterly corner of the U.S. Highway 50 connection right-of-way
described by deed of record in Book 240, page 660, Cole County Recorder's
Office; thence, along the northerly line of said connection right-of-way, the
following courses: N85°29'44'W, 264.86 feet; thence N49°07'58"W, 230.71 feet;
thence N47°05'00"W, 313.86 feet to the easterly line of West Truman Boulevard
(formerly known as North Ten Mile Drive); thence N8°34'28"E, along the easterly
line of said West Truman Boulevard, 490.41 feet; thence N6°37'21"E, along the
easterly line of said West Truman Boulevard, 401.12 feet to the northerly end of
the aforesaid connection right-of-way; thence northeasterly on a curve to the
right, said curve having a radius of 1300.00 feet, an arc distance of 352.81 feet,
(the chord of said curve being N16°48'12"E, 351.73 feet) to a point on the
southerly boundary of the property described by deed of record in Book 555,
page 698; thence N85°03'03"E, along the said southerly boundary of the property
described by deed of record in Book 555, page 698 and along the southerly
boundary of El Mercado Development, Section 1, as per plat of record in Plat
Book 11, page 402 and along the southerly boundary of those properties
described by deeds of record in Book 529, page 947 and in Book 462, page 649,
Cole County Recorder's Office, 1425.15 feet; thence N86°11'11"E, along the
southerly boundary of said property described in Book 462, page 649 and along
the southerly boundary of the property described by deed of record in Book 546,
page 150, Cole County Recorder's Office, 692.99 feet to the southeasterly corner
of said property described in Book 546, page 150 and said corner being on the
westerly boundary of Monticello Acres, Section Nine, as per plat of record in Plat
Book 11, page 859, Cole County Recorder's Office; thence S3°59'18"E, along the
westerly boundary of Monticello Acres, Section Nine, 700.95 feet to the
southwesterly corner thereof, being a point on the south line of said Section 4,
Township 44 North, Range 12 West, at the southeasterly corner of the property
described by deed of record in Book 629, page 196, Cole County Recorder's
Office; thence 586°32'02'W, along the Section Line, 389.43 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, It appears that the procedures set forth in the zoning code have been complied
with, as said property owner/agent submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council an application and signage plan for a Special
Exception Use Permit for the above referenced property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON,
MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Special Exception Signage Plan, on file in Case No. P15001 in the
Jefferson City Planning Division and attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved for the
site described above.
SECTION 2. Conditions. Approval of the Special Exception Signage Plan shall be
subject to the following condition:
1. Electronic Message Centers to adhere to Chapter 3 (Advertising and Signage).
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval. I
Passed: / / )5— Approved: 0/C
fun //
4 Presiding O G. -r r V ,, Mayor
ATTEST: - APPROV D AS TO FORM:
City Clerk `, - ' C Counselor
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PLANNING AND ZONING MATTERS
The City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri,will hold a public hearing on the following planning and
zoning matter on Monday, March 2, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the John G. Christy
Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, Jefferson City, Missouri.
3600 BLOCK OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE 3700 BLOCK OF WEST TRUMAN BOULEVARD
-SPECIAL EXCEPTION SIGNAGE PLAN.A Special Exception Signage Plan has been submitted for a
Superstore/Big Box Retail Development on property described as: Part of the South Half of Section 4,
and part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and part of the West Half of the
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 9, all in Township 44 North, Range 12 W, in
the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at
the northeast corner of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said
Section 9; thence S4°26'19"E, 760.31 feet to the northerly line of Old U.S. Route No. 50 (now
Country Club Drive); thence 578°00'23"W, along the northerly right of way of Country Club Drive,
1413.73 feet to the most easterly corner of the U.S. Highway 50 connection right-of-way described
by deed of record in Book 240, page 660, Cole County Recorder's Office; thence, along the
northerly line of said connection right-of-way, the following courses: N85°29'44"W, 264.86 feet;
thence N49°07'58"W, 230.71 feet; thence N47°05'00"W, 313.86 feet to the easterly line of West
Truman Boulevard (formerly known as North Ten Mile Drive);thence N8°34'28"E, along the easterly
line of said West Truman Boulevard,490.41 feet;thence N6°37'21"E, along the easterly line of said
West Truman Boulevard, 401.12 feet to the northerly end of the aforesaid connection right-of-way;
thence northeasterly on a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 1300.00 feet, an arc
distance of 352.81 feet, (the chord of said curve being N16°48'12"E, 351.73 feet) to a point on the
southerly boundary of the property described by deed of record in Book 555, page 698; thence
N85°03'03"E, along the said southerly boundary of the property described by deed of record in Book
555, page 698 and along the southerly boundary of El Mercado Development, Section 1, as per plat
of record in Plat Book 11, page 402 and along the southerly boundary of those properties described
by deeds of record in Book 529, page 947 and in Book 462, page 649, Cole County Recorder's
Office, 1425.15 feet; thence N86°11'11"E, along the southerly boundary of said property described
in Book 462, page 649 and along the southerly boundary of the property described by deed of
record in Book 546, page 150, Cole County Recorder's Office, 692.99 feet to the southeasterly
corner of said property described in Book 546, page 150 and said corner being on the westerly
boundary of Monticello Acres, Section Nine, as per plat of record in Plat Book 11, page 859, Cole
County Recorder's Office; thence S3°59'18"E, along the westerly boundary of Monticello Acres,
Section Nine, 700.95 feet to the southwesterly corner thereof, being a point on the south line of said
Section 4, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, at the southeasterly corner of the property described
by deed of record in Book 629, page 196, Cole County Recorder's Office; thence 586°32'02"W,
along the Section Line, 389.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Individuals should contact the ADA
Coordinator at(573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call
(573) 634-6410 with questions regarding these matters.
Phyllis Powell, City Clerk, City of Jefferson, Missouri
P.T. - Friday, February 13, 2015
For contact information only.
Department of Planning and Protective Services/Planning Division
320 East McCarty Street, Room 120, Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Contact: Anne Stratman or Janice McMillan
Phone (573) 634-6475 Fax (573) 634-6457
CAPITAL MALL
-RE VISED SPECIAL
'E XCEPTION SIGNAGE PLA"N
February 6, 2015
Signing: Due to requirements imposed by existing leases and MoDOT, and
consideration given to the critical importance of having adequate signage available to
attract future tenants to the property, the following changes have been made to the sign
plan .
Pylon Sign #1 (Hwy 50);
• The location of Pylon Sign #1 has been specified to be on the Hardee's tract.
Hardee's has verbally committed to this location.
• T he height of the sign box has been reduced to 30 feet, and the Electronic
Message Center has been removed to comply with MoDOT requirements .
• Anchor Panel size has increased to 80 sf.
• Total sign area has increased from 530 sf to 550 sf.
• The architecture of the sign has been modified in order to accommodate the
above changes.
Pylon Sign #2 (W. Truman Blvd. at Mall Entrance signal)
• The location of Pylon Sign #2 has been specified to replace the ex isting "Capital
Maii/Hyvee " s ign
• Anchor Panel size has increased to 80 sf . Hyvee has been added to the pylon to
eliminate a previously proposed 200 sf freestanding sign .
• Total sign area has increased from 450 sf to 562 sf.
• The architecture of the sign has been modified in order to accommodate the
increased size .
Future Pylon Sign #3
(W. Truman Blvd. between Mall Entrance and Country Club Dr.)
• Pylon Sign #3 has been added to provide the ability in the future to adequately
represent prospective tenants.
• The exact location of Pylon Sign #3 will be dete rmined at the time of
construction .
• If Pylon Sign #3 is constructed, the existing "Capital 8" sign will be removed.
• The design and height of Pylon Sign #3 would be similar to the rev ised Pylon
Sign #2.
1 inch -too FEET
0 60 100 200
( Orophlo S¢elo -Fool )
,-----r-------.------,
: (LOT 11l (LOT Ill :
I (LO~Ol I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----l i ----..._..._ I
NOT£S:
P)Con Sk!o"' A momwm o f ono p)lon t1Qn od)>cenl to
¥!.~~f,>d50 .:t.~~~A~:.n:,«;.::;:.,~~.,t to
r<-U.• ooithn tho Spedol U.«j>Uon Pion Are<>. Tho
pj(on algns ''"'' bo Mpotola from n<><mof a!90>ogt
olowonee for lhe Pfoper-ly on ~Jch It It locoted and
ol>ofl not PfOYMl pl<>«ment of lreu l 0<1cl't~9 algns 1t<W!9
thot Pfop¥ly under nonnof •19n0i• oUowonc-e1.
•eopttcl llo'l• Froulancl'ng 191• ol>oll bo upotolo from
normol .q,oge olo•once IO< the r<-'Y on ..tlkll II lo
locat ed ond shd1 not prtwnt pfocement of freettancf'..-.9 •19n• Uf\lng thol Pfopotty unde< nO<mol .q,oge
Q'Jio•ont~•-
OuUolo .nlhn tho Spcelol E•c09tlon Atoo a1>o1 odllwe to
o1owonce s.
-----t...
W.a.L U
. .s. Rour~; so ...
t:.a.c u
.s. Rour~; so ..
I ~I
DILLAROS
------...!. ------
..
~ 110\I!ITf~
f:q>itol llo~ Entrone<~ Si9nt ~ 0 100:0 -' -~.0 •f
R ... D<eso f<>< ll» 1 11 I ~ 'i!-183.7 •f 1-::===------1
Jf.toon'a I 0 1M~ • 16.8 of
fuiiHo T<llOftl I 0 200.0 llf • 200.0 Jf
'iK Teooot SiMs ~ : l ~.§ ~ '----------1
Totol ~=~~:.Sod~-~..2J0 7•3 ,1 r
Rtmcwt<l BuZcfw l.lounl tcf $ignggt • J1'r9 5 ar
Toto! S...16n9 II.OYnltd Signo<J• -!648.3 of
l!UUO ll7..S
''"'•0 616 -· 11
J!p'l@ tU
si-cnse S9.S
s1'"s 0 cu
si:&NP l316
lOYAL Wil.OCHG MOUHTI:OSlG fiAGl P)'.o<~ Sign It (thy. 50)
'Cop;tol lion·
l.ncho< Ponob
sl.tns O 1811
si&.MO 2a 1
TotaiT~tl
BE RDIO\t:D
PYLON SIGN #1
ROUTE 50
sears
l!!enney
billaids
iZOSS
~lSSi~lUS
Other T tMnt Pontts
1 0 30 I f
4 0 80 of
4 0 50 of
Tolol
• 30.0 ,,
-J20.0 ,,
~
-~.0 .,
P)'.on Sign 12 (Trumon B.W)
•eop;tol uoa' 1 o 12 .5 of • 12.5 sf
Ancho< Poneb 5 0 80 If • 400.0 •f
Olhtr Ttnonl POMio 4 0 25 of • 100.0 sf
Dee. lluoogo Center 1 0 50 of ~
Tolol • 562.5 If
P)'.or> Sigo 13 (Trvmon Blvd)
Futuro SJon, would b e a;m':or to f»\or> Sign 12
£xistin9 •eop;tol e· 119<1 ..... ld be removed w
P)'.on Si9n #J b constructed.
Country Club ft (32' mox. ht.)
'Coptlol llow•
Country Club 12 (32' mox. ht.)
·eop;tol llo~·
':'
n
·'
50&1
50,,
PYLON SIGN #3 !Future>
'1\UT l'RIJIWI BLVD.
Exhibit A
Capital Mall Special
Exception Signage Plan
CJ)
1-· 0 _Jz _j _Jw _j
<(~ q ~w _J> "J
.....J
<(0 .....J < 1-a: ~ -a.. .....J a..~ ~ <(_
Ow a..
<:§ 1-
CJ)
SIGNING
PLAN
HE£1 11\J118ER
11
a:
::> 0 en en
.~ ex: -0~ mz ::>::> dg
>-w ex:_,
!zo ::>(.)
gr: ou gz
C'>Q en ex: w u.. u.. w ....,
'
1 Inch = 100 FEET
0 60 100 200 300
( Craphlo Scola -Pool )
.. ..
IIOT£S:
~ The P)ton s1gns moy be located ol any
f<><otlon od)X«~l to Hlghooy 50 and Truman Blwl. os ;on<>., on ony eos...,....,t 0< ptopetly thot tilt Copllol 11o·1
o•-nt t moy oc:qvire (Of' s!9009e pwposu. A moximum of
one p~on s!9" odjoeent to eoch rood•oy wll b•
permitted to rtpt"e.unt the ptopett.lts t~~ilh!n lhe ~dol
E><e<9llon PIOil keo. Tho pj(on s!g>t lho"l be seporol<
from nOf'l'nCII &'9"1091 d.!o-.once f« lhe ptopttty on •hJch
It Is ~oted ond shdl n o t Pf~"Cnl P:occ.mcnt of
frust ond"'ng $.'9nS s~ thol property under norm al
s!.gnoge O:~wances..
•eopltol Lto1• r reu\oocfng ~~ ahoU bt StpO(Ott from
J':~~ ~~o~·~:~;~\~t ~~<~=l~,o'fr~~~~~!'
sign s aerVA'\g thot property ulldu normol a)gn09•
'cil o•oncu.
J.C, PENNEY BUILDIN(}
....
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
W.a.t u .. s.Rourtso
€.8 .L u
. .s. Rourt so -
....
l ~~.Pi&ii ' T AALa.• 11
i
I toT el
..
CAPITAl MAll EXISTl NG SIGfiAGE
s/lflJfl ll9.l d/s'l'\•
"sns Q £1.& \fbJ~u
\ollf"O U7.S sf/li~•
liV~sD 61.6 sf/sJI'\•
VI>"'\S II 71 srt~.-."'
..rcns{t 411 lf/JJi"'=
.rcrue = '''""''
""" Q 1.6.4 ~"'"'"' l $1£M fl 33L6 sfbiC"' ~::
TOTAl iUill>lHGMOUimOSIGHAG t
vanso u.s sf/sl"'"
9pug 21-S "'""'.
"""0 110.1 s r/sJ"1 ~
"'"'Q 2&1 srtvf'l =
Totll Ttvm~n 11
TN 1'1U 'll1(tt,._•u ) J.'&f\SO 911.6 sf/sJ"'•
\C,p:u l f.\ltiJ """€1 168 sr/lir.t•
Toul TnHNn ll
5.s6
61
l1 0 8£ RE.VO\W
17 ' 10 8( R!)j0\{0
IBl.
0 stGtL PRl.'ITS ISSUED
BVl.O:.'jG fJOUW£0 StCMAGE 11/12/11
Copilol 1/o, Entron<t S.'g"' 4 0 100.0 sl • 400.0 ol
Ron Oren tOI' leu 1 0 183.7 sf -183.7 af """'==,.,.,..-------i
1\'bon·s 1 0 16.8 sl • 16.8 sl RE\'ISIOIIS:
roturo Tenont I 0 200.0 sf • 200.0 of 12/26/11
l/isc Te non\ §"IS!ot • 500 0 af
FREE SJA.',tO'NQ SKINS
50' fY.on S:'l)n
·eop;tol 11o1r·
Tenont Pone•s
1 o 29.7 sr • 29.7 sf
9 0 45.9 sl • 413.1 ol
Elec. Ue noge Center 1 0 88of ~
Totol • 5J0.8 t l
3 5• f')1o<> Slgn
•eop;tol lloll"
Tenant P0t1 t!t
EJec. U essoge Centtr
I 0 12 .5 sf
90 22•1
I 0 38 s f
Totol
Hy.-et fret St ondinq S.~n
Counlly Club I t (J2' moe. hl)
·eopaol uou·
Couolly Club 12 (J2' moe. hl)
·eop;tol 1/oll"
Elec.ltonlc
Uusoge Cen t u
• 12.5 .,
-198.0 ,,
~
• 248.5 sl
200 ol
50 s l
50,,
P&J ~ PE · £rtjtvHt
J.'OI PE-200201 673'1
a: :::> (/) 0
I-c_j ~
_.~Z .~ _j a: -_.~w _j ~~
50' PYLON SIGN
<(~
~w q =>:::> -'o
ROUTE 50
Oe<.ltonlc
Uessoge Ccn t u
_.~> ...., <->u _. >-w
<(0 _. a:....~
<( t-o t-O: ~ zu -a.. _. 6 -a..~ ~ u~ <(_ 0(.)
Ow 0... ::5z
<( C?Q
I-() en a: w (/) u. u. w -,
CUPS JOO llo. 73-238
SCAlE: 1"= 100'
SHEET nru:
SIGNING
PLAN
II') ,..
Q
N
ii; ,.. -,..
c:::
0 .... c:::
C'O ~
:I
1/1 c:::
0 u
41 .c ....
>-..c
2
:I ..c ·c:
Vi
i5
36' PYLON SIGN Original Signage Plan
(revised by applicant on 2-6-15) 1\EST TRWNI BI.VO.
EXCERPT OF UN -APPROVED MINUTES
JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 15, 2015 ·
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT
Jack Deeken
Dean Dutoi
Chris Jordan , Vice Chairman
David Nunn
Ralph Robinett, Chairman
Dale Vaughan
Bunnie Trickey Cotten, Alternate
Ron Fitzwater, Alternate
Kevin Thoenen , Alternate
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT
Bob George
Michael Lester
Chris Yarnell
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT
Carlos Graham, City Council Liaison
Ken Hussey, Alternate City Council Liaison
STAFF PRESENT
5:15p.m .
Janice McMillan, Director of Planning & Protective Services
Jeremy Cover, Associate City Counselor
Eric Barron, Senior Planner
Shane Wade, Civil Engineer II
Anne Stratman , Administrative Assistant
New Business/Public Hearings
ATTENDANCE RECORD
6 of7
4 of 7
5 of 7
6 of 7
4 of7
7 of 7
6 of 7
4 of 7
3 of 7
5 of 7
6 of 7
5 of 7
Case No. P15001 -3600 Block of Country Club Drive and 3700 Block of West Truman
Boulevard, Rezoning, Special Excepti o n Permit, and Preliminary Plat. Applications filed by
Capital Mall JC LLC , property owner, and city staff for the following:
1. A rezoning of approximately 61 acres from C-1 Neighborhood Commercial to C-2
General Commercial.
2. A special exception permit for a general retail use with greater than 100,000 square feet
of building area.
3. A preliminary plat for the property and associated new and existing outlets.
The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of West Truman Boulevard and
Country Club Drive. Businesses located on the property include the Capital Mall, Hy-Vee grocery
store, outlets occupied by Wendy's , Pizza Hut, and Hardees, and two undeveloped outlets on
Country Club Drive . The property is described as part of the South Half of Section 4 and part of
Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, Jefferson City, Missouri (Central Missouri
Professional Services, Consultant).
Mr. Barron briefly discussed the handouts provided to the audience , Commission members,
Council Liaisons and staff. He explained that a revised plan for the Capital Mall redevelopment was
distributed by the Consultant. Mr. Barron stated that the revised plan addresses comments and
concerns from the adjacent neighborhood.
Mr. Barron described the proposal and explained that the owner/developer of the Capital Mall has
prepared a plan for the redevelopment of the Mall and surrounding outlets. He stated that due to its
size of greater than 100,000 square feet, the Capital Mall is defined as a Big Box retail development
and must obtain a Special Exception Use Permit and adhere to certain design guidelines. ty1r.
Barron explained that the owner is also proposing a rezoning of the property from C-1
Neighborhood Commercial to C-2 General Commercial in order to bring the zoning of the property
into better alignment with the high traffic commercial use. He stated that the proposal includes
property occupied by the Hy-Vee grocery store, Capital 8 Theaters, Pizza Hut, Wendy's, Hardee's ,
Sears, and all businesses within the Capital Mall. Mr. Barron explained that a companion rezoning
Excerpt of Un-Approved Minutes/Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission
January 15, 2015
Page 2
request fil ed by city staff would rezone tracts owned by JC Penney and Dillards from C-1
Neighborhood Commercial to C-2 General Commercial in order to unify the zoning of the Capital
Mall complex and better match the existing use of these parcels . He stated that a preliminary plat
formalizing the existing outlets and creation of three additional outlets is also proposed. Mr. Barron
explained that a final subdivision plat will be submitted at a later date. He discussed the
arrangement of the existing bufferyard on the eastern side of the subject property.-
Mr. Paul Samson , Central Missouri Professional Services, 2500 E. McCarty Street, spoke
regarding this request and explained that the purpose of the redevelopment is to make necessary
improvements to the facilities around the Capital Mall. Mr. Samson distributed the following visuals:
(1) overall site plan; (2) master planting plan ; (3) entrance improvements and building elevations;
and (4) signage plan. He stated that the current owners acquired the Mall in December 2012 . Mr.
Samson explained that the developers worked with City staff to get approval from the City Council
to establish a Community Improvement District and a Tax Increment Financing District to help fund
improvements to the facility. Mr. Samson explained that the developer presented the
redevelopment plan to the neighborhood on January 6 , 2015 to gather input and listen to their
concerns. He stated that the first new development will be a Ross Department Store which will
begin construction later this month and plans to open this summer. Mr. Samson explained that
Ross Department Store will be located in the northwest corner of the Mall where Wi lson 's Fitness
was previously located . He stated that exterior and interior improvements will take place over the
next five to six years. Mr. Samson explained that in the 1970's the original Capital Mall property
was brought into the City as a C-1 zoning district. He stated that at that time the C-1 zoning district
was an appropriate use for a facility such as the Mall. Mr. Samson explained that since that time the
zoning code has changed and now the Mall is considered a nonconforming use. He stated that the
original plan also included rezoning the vacant lot next to Red Lobster, as well as, the Hardee's lot.
Mr. Samson explained that based on comments received from the neighbors at the neighborhood
meeting, we are withdrawing the request to rezone the vacant lot next to Red Lobster. He stated
that this lot will remain zoned C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. Mr. Samson explained that the
preliminary plat will formalize the boundaries of the parcels that are currently being defined . He
stated that the preliminary plat shows a total of four (4) outlets: (1) the intersection of Truman
Boulevard at the Hy-Vee entrance ; (2) south of Sears along Country Club Drive; (3) between Pizza
Hut and Wendy 's; and (4) along Country Club Drive directly south of the Dillard's property. Mr.
Samson ex plained that City staff requested that we submit a Special Exception Use Permit to bring
the site in .line with current zoning requirements . He stated that they were originally requesting that
the light pole height restriction be removed from bufferyard Area D and Area F on the south side of
Country Club Drive. Mr. Samson explained that based on comments from the neighbors at the
neighborhood meeting we are no longer proposing any modifications to the existing buffer areas or
light pole heights in the bufferyard. He stated that signage will consist of: (1) Hy-Vee sign located
on the Hy-Vee outlot adjacent to Truman Boulevard; (2) two Capital Mall signs to be located at the
main entrances on Country Club Drive; (3) one pylon sign located at the Truman Boulevard
entrance to the Mall. The sign will include space for multiple tenants and an electron ic message
center is proposed within the sign structure; and (4) one pylon sign located adjacent to Highway 50 .
Mr. Samson explained that the existing lighting plan will be updated to high efficiency LED light
technology. He stated that it will be better able to direct light onto the parking lot and have less
spillover light. Mr. Samson ex plained that the lighting plan meets the requirement of the City Code
except for the Ross Department Store parking lot. He stated that the lease with Ross Department
Store requires a higher level of lighting than would normally be allowed per the zoning code. Mr.
Samson explained that the original proposal showed taller light poles along the east side of
Dillard's, however the pole heights have been reduced to 25 feet. He stated that the City Code will
require that the lighting levels throughout the parking lot be reduced by 50 percent after 10:00 p.m.
Mr. Samson explained that one item on the orig i nal plan that has been eliminated is the proposal to
modify the existing landscaped island on Country Club Drive to create a roundabout to provide
access to the lot south of Country Club Drive. He stated that after listening to the neighbor's
concerns we have taken out that improvement and the landscaped island will remain as is.
No one spoke in favor of this request.
Excerpt of Un-Approved Minutes/Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission
January 15, 2015
The following individuals expressed concerns regarding this proposal:
Page 3
Becky Haight, 3463 Hobbs Lane , expressed the following concerns: (1) keep the outlots zoned C-
1 as to provide protection to the neighborhood from C-2 zoning uses; (2) keep Lot 7 zoned C-1
since it is in close proximity to the neighborhood ; and (3) keep the large pylon sign as far away from
the residential neighborhood as possible .
Joe Bednar, 3434 Hobbs Lane , expressed the following concerns: (1) additional communication
on what a C-2 zoning would allow on the outlots would be beneficial ; (2) do not want to see
Missouri Boulevard like traffic issues with two competing ingress/egress accesses; and (3)
concerned with building heights in the C-2 district.
Ms . Haight and Mr. Bednar complemented the developers on listening to the neighbor's and
addressing the ir concerns.
Correspondence in opposition to this proposal was received from the following individuals :
Jeena & Jake Hunget, 3405 Hobbs Ln ; Martha LeMond, 3404 Hobbs Ln; Jim & Betty Weber,
3420 Country Club Dr; Jim & Irene Tergin , 3501 Country Club Dr; John & Amy Feldmann, 3454
Hobbs Ln; Laurie Pleus on behalf of Mrs. Don B. Riley ; Mrs . Don B. Riley, 3448 Hobbs Ln ; Jim
and Jeanette Dulle, 3319 Country Club Dr; Camille McClain , 3416 Hobbs Ln ; Jim Eichelberger,
3320 Country Club Dr ; Susan Bregant Raaz on behalf of Barbara Bregrant, 3435 Country Club
Dr; Martha Ann Claiborne, 3460 Hobbs Ln; Randy & Becky Haight, 3463 Hobbs Ln ; Doug &
Patricia Thomas, 3444 Hobbs Ln; and Bart & Mandee Carney, 3440 Hobbs Ln .
Mr. Wade gave the Engineering Division staff report . Mr. Barron gave the Planning Division staff
report .
Mr. Barron requested that the motions include accepting the revised plan presented by the
Consultant at tonight's meeting .
Mr. Jordan moved and Mr. Dutoi seconded to recommend approval of rezoning the property,
including existing and proposed outlots, from C-1 Neighborhood Commercial to C-2 General
Commercial excluding Lot 6 as presented by the Consultant at tonight's meeting, to the City
Council. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes:
Aye: Cotten, Deeken, Dutoi, Jordan , Nunn, Thoenen , Vaughan
Abstain: Fitzwater
Mr. Jordan moved and Mr. Vaughan seconded to recommend approval of the Special Exception
Use Permit, as presented at the meeting , with the following conditions :
a . Electronic Message Centers to adhere to Chapter 3 (Advertising and Signage);
b . The noted exceptions of parking lot separation and parking lot lighting approved as outlined
within the plan .
The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes:
Aye: Cotten , Deeken , Dutoi , Jordan , Nunn, Thoenen, Vaughan
Abstain: Fitzwater
Mr. Jordan moved and Ms. Cotten seconded to approve the Preliminary Subdivision Plat, subject
to the following condition:
a. Street frontage variance for Lots 3 and 4
The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes:
Aye : Cotten, Deeken , Dutoi , Jordan, Nunn, Thoenen, Vaughan
Abstain : Fitzwater
Stratman, Anne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Ms . Hunget ,
Barron, Eric
Thursday, January 15, 2015 2:37 PM
jeena@fcrsells.com'
Stratman, Anne; McMillan, Janice
RE: Letter Addressing Zoning on Country Club Drive
Thank you for your comments, they will be printed and distributed to the Planning and Zoning Com'mission at their
meeting tonight {January 151h).
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Senior Planner
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Jeena Hunget [mailto:jeena@fcrsells .com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:16 PM
To: Stratman, Anne
Subject: Letter Addressing Zoning on Country Club Drive
Please see attached letter concerning the re-zoning of Country Club Drive near the Hobbs Lane neighborhood.
Thank you!
J eena Hunget
Buye r Sp ecialis t
Firs r Choice T eam
Ke ller Willi ams Rcahy
573.30 1.0263
This ema il has been scanned by the Symantec E mail Security.cloud service .
For more information plea se vis it http://www.s ym antecclo ud .com
1
January 15, 2015
City of Jefferson
Planning and Zoning Commission
Dear Members :
We are writing to express our concern over proposed changes by Farmer Holding Company to
the area bordering the neighborhood of Hobbs Lane and Country Club Drive.
It has come to ou r attention that the original agreement reached back in 1977 creating the buffer
zone between the commercial and residential areas is proposed to change .
We are new to the neighbo rhood, and are looking forw ard to many years in a well -established,
residential area. The orig inal reason for add ing the landscaped buffe r median was to create an
entrance to a residential area and for a boundary between the commercial and residential area.
A round-a-bout would only seem more commercial and it doesn 't seem to be needed
considering the road only goes straight. In addition, remov ing trees and raising light poles
would encroach o n the residential neighborhood and violate the buffer zone boundary of the
original 1977 agreement.
We are concerned that a round -a-bout would increase traffic f low through the residential area
which is a safety concern for children playing in the neighborhood and would increase overall
noise which may affect property values in the future .
Thank you for your consideration.
Jeena and Jake Hunget
3405 Hobbs Lane
Jefferson City , MO 65109
Stratman, Anne
From: McMillan, Janice
Sent:
To:
Thursday, January 15, 2015 12 :18 PM
'Camille McClain'
Subject: RE: Case No. 15001 -Capital Mall
Ms. McClain,
I am confirming that your photographs and letter were received. Your photos and letter will be copied for the
Planning and Zoning Commission and distributed at tonight's meeting. Thank you for contacting us.
J~Mc}vf~ AICP
Director, Department of Planning & Protective Services
City of Jefferson, Missouri 65101
320 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Email jmcmillan@jeffcitymo.org
Direct 573.634.6424
Main 573.634.6410
From: Camille McClain [mailto:wflowerrulz@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:09 PM
To: McMillan, Janice
Subject: Case No. 15001 -Capital Mall
Hello Ms. McMillan -
I would like to submit these pictures to go with my letter I brought to your office yesterday. They are photos of the
current island that helps to separate out neighborhood from the Mall area and several roundabouts in town. The
roundabouts pictured are on Big Horn Dr., Ellis Blvd . and E. McCarty St. I've also attached a copy of my letter in
case you need it.
Thank you,
Camille McClain
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
1
January 14,2015
Department of Planning and Protective Services, Planning Division
John G. Cluisty Municipal Building/City Hall
320 East McCarty Street, Room 120
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Re : Case No. P15001
3600 Block of Country Club Drive
3700 Block ofW. Truman Boulevard
To Members ofthe Planning and Zoning Commission:
I am a home owner in the Country Club Drive Neighborhood, specifically Hobbs Ln. As my home is
very close to the Capital Mall Propet1y, I am very concerned about the change in zoning from C-1
Neighborhood Commercial to C-2 General Commercial and the approval ofthe Special Exception Use
Permit.
My primary concern with the change in zoning is the potential for development of new businesses
which should not be allowed near a residential neighborhood. As I understand it , most of Missouri
Boulevard is zoned C-2 This area is an example of the type of businesses and development which are
exactly the opposite of what most people want adjacent to their homes. Although the area on Country
Club Drive near the mall has commercial businesses, it is certainly not in the same category as
Missouri Boulevard. To change the zoning of the Capital Mall propet1ies to C-2 will open the area up
to all types of commercial businesses including 24-hour drive tluoughs, Gas Stations, Convenience
Stores, Tobacco and Liquor Stores, etc. This potential is not limited only to vacant lots. It is not out of
the realm of possibility for the entire Capital Mall building to be demolished and be completely
redeveloped (Example -Biscayne Mall in Columbia). Providing the area with a C-2 zoning has the
potential to have a huge negative impact upon our neighborhood.
The Planning Staff Report dated January 15, 2015 contains the following infmmation related to the
rezoning and Special Exception Use Permit:
Staff Analysis and Recommendations :
• The owner/developer has a plan for redevelopment of the Capital Mall and is requesting a
Special Exception Use Permit and a change from a C-1 to C-2 to "bring the zoning of the property into
better alignment with the high traffic commercial use".
• Staff recommendations show the property would not comply with the requirement of a C-2 area
as the lighting "exceeds the maximum standard of 3.0 footcandles in a C-2 district". (Lighting of the
propetty adjacent to our neighborhood, specifically excessive lighting, i s a detriment).
• The exception shall be approved only if the Commission fmds the use and plan will not
"substantially and permanently injure the appropriate use of neighboring property." and will not "cause
traffic , parking or environmental problems"
Review of the City Council Meeting Minutes, dated September 6, 1977 reveals agreements made at
that time between the original developer and residents of the adjoining prope1ty. At that time, the
Council directed the following :
• Mall prope1ty owners will assist residents with "Controlled speeds on Country Club Drive."
• In the area adjacent to the residential homes, a wilderness area be maintained (this is the
trapezoidal area on the very West edge of the Mall prope1ty). In addition, a 50 foot tract of land
numing parallel to the wilderness area shall be a "landscaped buffer" including a hedge to screen auto
lights. Next would be a 30 foot service road, and finally a 75 foot parking area.
• The area on the south side of Country Club shall have a 50 foot area "landscaped bank" and the
adjacent 50 foot of space would be limited to parking.
• The light poles in the eastern side of the Mall property will be "25 foot height with directional
light shrouded away from the residential area to the east".
I ask that City keep their word and maintain these requirements.
The developers have suggested replacing the current island separating the residential area from the
conunercial area with a roundabout. After driving around the city and viewing other roundabouts , I am
convinced that replacing the island would decrease the visual separation between the two areas and
increase the commercial look. The addition of a roundabout would increase the amount of hard surface
and decrease the amount of vegetation and visual barrier. Our current island has four street signs
related to it. As I have seen with other roundabouts, they have three to four signs per inlet. This would
more than double the amount of street signs in that area. I request the developers maintain the cm~rant
island and improve the landscaping to separate the areas .
In conclusion, I request that the zoning should be maintained as C-1 . I understand the current buildings
on the property do not meet all the standards fo r this designation. I am not sure how the City allowed
the prope1ty to be developed inappropriately for the zoning, but as the saying goes -"Two wrongs don't
make a right". Please maintain cunent zoning to protect out neighborhood from future detrimental
development. Do not allow the developers to reduce the amount of "buffer" area from our
neighborhood . Do not let them decrease the amount of landscaping which helps to designate our area
as residential. Do not allow lighting and signage at excessive heights, visible in our area . Do not allow
a roundabout to be added.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Camille McClain
3416 Hobbs Ln.
Jefferson City, MO 65109
.).a � \�) I} f
a.. 'LYl'�. �' �T ��
1
f 'a � ��
�`
MARTHA S. LeMOND
3404 HOBBS LANE
JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI 65109
January 12, 2015
Mr. Ralph Robinett, Chairman
City of Jefferson Planning
and Zoning Commission
Department of Planning and
Protective Services, Planning Division
John G. Christy Municipal Building/City Hall
320 East McCatty Street, Room 120
Jefferson City, MO 65101
RECEIVED
JAN 1 5 2015
Re: Case No . P15001 -3600 Block of Country Club Drive and 3700 Block of West Truman
Boulevard; Rezoning, Special Exception Permit, and Preliminary Plat.
Dear Mr. Robinett and Commission Members:
I am a propetty owner and resident in the neighborhood adjacent to the Capital Mall. I am
writing to express concern over the proposed rezoning requests on the pa1t of the owners and
operators of the Capital Mall .
I am in favor of progress and the pursuit of development that will ensure that our city will
continue to grow and remain a vibrant place in which to raise our families .
However, I am concerned about any proposal that will increase traffic and erode safety along
Country Clu.b, as well as those proposed developments that have the potential of devaluing the
value of properties in a neighborhood that has a long history of being a quality neighborhood that
is sustainabie into the future .
I understand that these proposals are being made without regard of a prior 1977 resolution made
on the prut of the city and the owner of the mall property that requires the owners of the prope1ty
to take into consideration the concerns of the adjacent neighborhood in any development
proposal. As it stands now, I do not believe this has been done.
Consequently, I would request that action on the proposed zoning change be delayed until such
time as the owners of the mall take into consideration the needs and concerns of the
neighborhood .
I am particularly concerned about the green-belt separating the mall property from the
neighborhood being substantially reduced or eliminated, as well as inappropriate signage and
increased traffic through the neighborhood .
There are realistically a number of issues that need to be taken into consideration in light of the
1977 resolution . I would ask anyone serving on the Commission, and/or the City Council to
honor prior commitments made on behalf of the city and the owners of the prope1ty in question.
January 13, 2015
Dear Mayor Struemph,
As neighbors who live within 185 feet of the Capitol Mall, we are pleased to see that
improvements are planned to the building entrance facades and parking lot that
includes the addition of trees and landscaping.
However, we are very concerned regarding the plan to remove 30 feet of our buffer
along the east side of the mall and the proposed round-a-bout to be placed on Country
Club Drive and the zoning change from C-1 to C-2 . We do not want the west portion of
Country Club Dr. to look like C-2 Missouri Blvd. It should be noted that there needs to a
good buffer between the commercial area and residential area which was not
maintained adequately by General Growth.
We simply request that you keep the commitments that were made to our neighborhood
in a resolution at a Council Meeting held in September 1977. Please leave the buffer
and improve it as originally promised and leave the zoning along Country Club Dr. in
front of the mall as a C-1. We request that the island stay as it delineates the residential
area from a commercial area. We are very concerned about what the proposed
changes will do to the safety of the area and the investments we have made in our
homes and property .
· _:erely, . t: ~CeJ~
czj~t{~
Jim & Betty Weber
3420 Country Club Dr.
Jefferson City, MO 651 09
573-893-4723
RE EIVED
JAN 1 5 2015
January 13, 2015
Dear Mr. Robinett,
As neighbors who live within 185 feet of the Capitol Mall, we are pleased to see that
improvements are planned to the building entrance facades and parking lot that
includes the addition of trees and landscaping.
However, we are very concerned regard ing the plan to remove 30 feet of our buffer
along the east side of the mall and the proposed round -a-bout to be placed on Country
Club Drive and the zoning change from C-1 to C-2 . We do not want the west portion of
Country Club Dr. to look like C-2 Missouri Blvd. It should be noted that there needs to a
good buffer between the commercial area and res idential a rea which was not
maintained adequately by General Growth.
We simply request that you keep the commitments that were made to our neighborhood
in a resolution at a Council Meeting held in September 1977. Please leave the buffer
and improve it as originally promised and leave the zon ing along Country Club Dr. in
front of the mall as a C-1. We request that the island stay as it delineates the residential
area from a commercial area. We are very concerned about what the proposed
changes will do to the safety of the area and the investments we have made in our
homes and property.
~c:J~
Jim & Betty Weber
3420 Country Club Dr.
Jefferson City, MO 65109
573-893-4 723 EIVED
JAN 1 5 2015
\ (
--------~---~~·~~lb~A~~'-~~~~~G9~~~~.~~~-~-~----~
-------Hft-:.-1--h..."'(~-~ \242 "' t ~ b2 \_Q___\_~ =t 0----v-..~~\:-"~---------1
.~ . I ~ ~' L"\ t> r:_ Q_ 1'"-r ';:-..,. ..,--( Q\N \) ~~ f'C.' --------+++-V-1-~f-M--'V-'-Y --'\'=t-\~7---'Ct.V.,...'Cf.r.:::-ft---<;-.-~v~\-t\.-:: "" -_f±rci.L.
-----m-...I..Jr-..C:..:::.....-....\,o_w_c_u_T.t._~\.0-6=.-U:LT-I\l-12 l".-~~~I~~R.o,w\+~~-,-
____ ---H+---~-\--"'F-\.~&--~tt-Ll V\a u~-i)-\ll ~tG-G-h-\-~6::~-~D G::~, ....... ~ ~-1
-------H~0&;--0-~ f:...v-. \..~It\' J ~S?~-:6_t:-___: ±o.!...)_o_~~~
--------~l---------------}3~~~~~~~~~------------------1 ~ I ~/
--+-»----~ vQ_ ~~~-~
-----+~1------------3--.J.s o ,_Co.t.-t-'--'~'(-e....l ~~.J-V~-~·----j
_____ _,t l---------------~) _c ,1iD-·-~~\e~-------~
RECEIVED_•----------t
JAN rs-2o1 r -
PLANNING&
-----·-r------------~~-P~RO~~:~C~TIIVE~~~ER~VI~CE~~·~~---------------~
------~----------1
--.. ------------------~--,------
-· . -----I ----------------. --------
Stratman, Anne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr. and Mrs. Feldmann,
Barron, Eric
Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:50AM
'amy.feldmann@gmail.com'
Stratman, Anne; McMillan, Janice
RE: Comments regarding Capital Mall Rezoning
Thank you for your comments, they will be printed and distributed to the Planning and Zoning Commissioners at their
meeting tonight (January 151h).
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Senior Planner
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
-------
From: amy.feldmann@gmail.com [mailto :amy.feldmann@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 9:13 PM
To: Stratman, Anne
Subject: Comments regarding Capital Mall Rezoning
Regarding the proposed rezoning of the Capital Mall and surrounding area, please consider the following comments:
Improvements for mall area are important and necessary for the preservation and growth of Jefferson City. Most of the
proposed improvements to the mall should make the mall more attractive to consumers. However with these
proposals, there is no need to rezone the entire mall area, including all outlots, to C2, when only the mall building needs
to be C2. Keep the outlots zoned at Cl until specific future plans are presented that may require a C2 zoning.
When the mall area was first developed in 1977, General Growth Properties (GGP) signed an agreement to protect the
adjacent residential area before proceeding with the development. At the 9/6/1977 city council meeting, a resolution
was adopted to concur with the agreement. Current owners and any future purchasers of the mall area and outlots
should be required to honor the provisions in this agreement and resolution.
Provisions such as maintaining a landscaped buffer, a tree buffer, reducing traffic through the residential area, and
keeping the lighting shrouded away from the residential neighborhood were agreed to in order to protect the value of
the residential neighborhood .
Our primary concern is that the provisions and spirit of the agreement made in 1977 be maintained to protect the
security and value of the residential neighborhoods, while improving the viability of the mall. Thank-you for your
consideration of these comments.
John and Amy Feldmann
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
1
Stratman, Anne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Laurie Pleus <lapleus@yahoo.com>
Wednesday, January 14, 2015 6:48 PM
Stratman, Anne
Re : Case No P15001 3600 Country Club Dr Rezoning I Letter from Mrs. Don B. Riley
Dated January 14, 2015
Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Division_Case No P15001_Mrs DonBRiley Letter Jan
14 2015.pdf; JC City Council Minutes Sept 6 1977 Resolution Relating to Country Club
Drive Area .pdf
Please see the above letter from Mrs. Don B. Riley concerning the subject under reference. It was hand delivered to Ann
Statman at the John Christy Municipal Building this afternoon.
She thanks you in advance for your consideration of this most important issue.
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
1
THE RILEYS
3 44 8 H obbs L an e
Je ffe rson C ity, M isso uri 65 1 09-l 0 35
Hand-Delivety and Email: jcplanning@jeffcitymo.org
Januaty 14, 2105
Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Division
320 E. McCmty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Re: Case No P15001-3600 Country Club Dr. and 3700 Block of West Truman Blvd, Rezoning-Special
Exception .Permit and Preliminary Plat I Impact On Nearby Residential Neighborhood
. ,·
Members oftne Planning and Zoning Commission:
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the letter I received dated Januaty 2, 2015 concerning the
application filed by Capital Mall JC, propetty owner, and city staff to address the following :
1. A rezoning of approximately 61 acres from C-1 Neighborhood Commercial to C-2 General
Commercial;
2. A special exceptionpetmit for a general retail use with greater than 100,000 square feet ofbuilding
area; and
3. A preliminmy plat for the propetty and associated new and existing out-lots.
I am supportive generally of the proposed improvements to the Capital Mall, HOWEVER, I have
SIGNIFICA~T concerns due to the fact that it does not appear that the current mall owners have any
intention of honoring the commitments made in 1977 (copy attached) to the residents of the adjoining
area. Specifically, the current proposals --to reduce the width of the "landscape buffer" in Area B
(from 50 feet wide to 30 feet) and the extension of buildings and parking into other areas of the project
llli!!h. the removal of the landscaped island on Country Club Drive to be replaced by a roundabout, and
the lifting of lighting restrictions -ARE ALL IN DIRECT CONFLICT with these commitments which
were adopted by the City Council and approved by the Mayor.
The 1977 agreement called for a hedge to be planted on the westem side of the mall propetty as an attempt to
screen auto lights to the nearby residents. Other landscaping was completed under a plan that was approved
by the Jefferson City Planning Office. This landscaping has successfully appeased the adjoining resident's
concerns. However, if the trees and existing hedge will be removed or significantly reduced, there will be no
screen of lights from the cars and the signs on the Dillards building and the Capital Theater.
The current proposals greatly upsets me, my family and our neighbors as they will most cettainly have a
negative effect on the peace and quiet enjoyment of our property, and we fear, the value and quality of our
neighborhood, one of the most elite in Jefferson City, that my family has called home since 1950.
Jefferson City Pla1ming and Zoning Division
Page 2
I IMPLORE YOU TO KEEP THE PROMISES MADE TO THE ADJOINING RESIDENTS. The
same restrictions should apply no matter who owns the mall property. All Jefferson City residents
should be concerned if these commitments are not honored.
Respectfully,
t;9~0~b .~
Mrs. Don B . Riley ~
cc : Bob Scrivner, Council Member Third Ward -Hand Delivety & email : Bscrivner@jeffcity.org
The Honorable Eric Stmemph, Mayor of Jefferson City -Hand Delivety & Email: Esttuemph@jeffcity.org
154.
•-----··-·-----··-....... ...Regular ... CQunci L Meeting ,_ Septemb er-.6 . .-.. 19.7.1.,_ -------·---.. -·-................ -........... -................. _._, ... . ~Mayor Hyder presided,
~i Prayer '-1as offered by Mayor Hyder.
......... -·-··---·---...... __ .. -.... , .. -----·
;; I
~Councilmen present: Borgmeyer, Brant, Gordon, Hager! Hartsfield,
McDowell, Rackers, Robinson, Wh~tecotton and
Wildhaber.
,; Councilmen absent: None. I A quorwn was declared pr~sent.
1iCouncilwoman McDowell moved that Bill No, 46 be reconsidered and
jsent to the Health Committee. The motion passed ,
,; The Minutes of the meeting of August 15th were approved 1 as f amended, ·
1:A communication wae recei;ed fr~m-r;std;n~e -on Poplar Street 1 •:requesting that the street be improved, and t~at the drainage ie
• inadequate. ·
Tho matter was referred to the Director of Public Works with
·.his recommendations to be reported to the Council at the next
.meeting as t o course of action.
•. ----------:·Wesley Farris, District Manager, Missouri Power and Light Company,
:; appeared before the Council in regard to the lighting of Missouri
~Boulevard .
·:Approval
:. of
·Minutes.
·Director
of Public
Works.
Lighting-
Missouri
Blvd,
:: He explained that due to the widening of Missouri Boulevard,
~it will be necessary to relocate all of the poles on both aides of .
1
• the street in the area between the Expreeeway and Howard Street . 1
~The Hifhway Department has approved their plan to completely rebuild'
t 8rea w th new poles, They now need approval of the Council to move
~all lights to the south side of Missouri Doulevard, with the :·
j·oddition of six lights to complete plan. There would be no cost to 1
• the City except the monthly charge for lights . 1•
'· Councilman Brllnt asked if they had considered going undergrourd.
!Mr. Farris replied that it would not be feasible llt this time, due :
f to the cost to the City at intersections.
, Councilman Gordon moved tht>.t tho plan be approved. Motion
~passed, _ ~ _______ _
:The following bid was ~·ccoivcd for two wator pumps for uso of the
(Fire Department:
Graosslo 1 s Sales & Sorvico
Ono Uomolito Centrifugal Pwnp, 150 gpm
< One Uomelito Centrifugal Pump, 300 gpm
't:Fire Chief Willmeno informed tho Council that the
$ 378 .99
649.99
bid on the two
·opening
·of
.o Bids.
pumps wae too high. ~The following bid was rec;i~ed fo; ~n~ ;e;c~o tool for use of the .Opening
:Fire Department: 'of :i Fire Rescue $ 5,263 . 00 •;Bids.
Scouncilman Borgmeyer moved that the bid be referred to the Fire i
;coumittee. Motion passed: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ·'
i The following bid was received for an Automatic RC Print Processor :opening
~for use of the Police Department: ·of
~ W. Schiller & Co. $ 2,495,00 .. Bids. ~Councilman Whitecotton moved that the bid be accepted. Motion
~passed .
~Bill No . 59 introduced b; Co~n~iim;n·B~r~; er, Gordon, Hager, ·Bill 59.
l Rackers, wddhaber, Hartsfield, McDowell, Ro~inson and Whitecotton, Zoning of ~'-entitled : Annexed
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, changing, Area,
amending and modifying the Zoning Map of the City of Jefferson, by
.a mending Ordinance 8508, by zoning and rezoning the area annexed to ~the City of Jefferson by Ordinance No. 8989, amending said
~Ordinance No. 8506, and providing for other matters relating to
zoning in such annexed areas."
Councilman Wildhaber suggested that the letter which TomBenton,
.Planning Director1 recei~~d from David Goller and other property .
owners, donating ~0 1 of r!ght·of-way from the existing right•of-way ·
become a part of the Ordinance, Mayor Hyder informed him that .,
right-of-way should not becooie part of e. zoning Ordinance. .o
Councilman Wildhaber then moved that the letter from Mr. Golla~
become a part of the minutes. Motion passed. ~ ·
I
I
I o o t o o
I I o 0 0
155.
·------·-·----··-· .. Regular .. Council Meeting,. Septemb.e.r 6, .197.7 •.. . . _ ........ ·-··--····
I
I . ···--·---·--······· .. ...... • ..... --... -· ...... ·······--····-·······-· ·-· ···-···········----
118111 No, 59 was read the third time by title and placod on final
/passage and was passed by tho following vote as Ordinance No. 9023:
•·Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Gordon, Hager! Hartsfield,:
.I McDoNell, Rackers, Robinson, Wh tecotton ~1 j' and '~ildhaber, h
·!councilmen voting Nay: None. 1;
;_councilmen absent: None, ~
il -• -- -- - - -• 1
.,'!The following Resolution was introduced: II
WHEREAS certain disputes have arisen relative to the effect ~~~
!lor alleged effect of the Capitol Mall Shoppinf Center project of . 1
;;General Growth Properties upon the nearby res dential neighborhood; I,
Resolution :land, I' Relatinf :l WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore considered various 1 to Genera .aspects of such disputes as they relate to the usage of Country -
1 Growth '·club Drive and zoning within the area; and, ·
I
I
and .; WHEREAS, of recent date substantial progress has been made lj
Country :, towards an amelioration or lessening of those disputes as is .
Club :;reflected by correspondence between counsel, which correspondence I
Drive ·1is marked Exhibits A and D, attached hereto and incorporated herein
Area. :,·by reference; and,
1 WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of furthering an I
1amelioration of those disputes; and, ~,
WHEREAS after considering the contents of the letter dated
!July 28, 1977, and ar.tached hereto as Exhibit A the City Council
:believes that certain of the concepts stated therein are meritorio
j.and should be tlie subject of further action by the City Council of
:j the City of Jefferson in addition to zoning action which is other· I
l.wtse being considered by the City Council• and
!! WHEREAS, inasmuch as the City Council bell eves that at this 11 l1time such matters should be considered together and are, therefore,
1 1:encompassed within this single resolution though some of the :
.;actions directed might otherwise be the subject of lese formal
'·action;
! NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED DY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
.! CITY OF JEFFERSON, AS FOLLOWS:
,! 1. Tho City Council commends General Growth Properties and 1;
'l the residents of the adjoining areas for the progress in ameliorat-~·
i: ing tho disputes between them which is reflected in Exhibits A and
i!D horeto1 and encourages them to continuo in their join~ efforts to :
1roduce tno outstanding areas of dispute. i;
:1 2. T~= Cit~ ~ounc~~ eedorse~ ~n pri~ciple te~ ~~~s~~: ~~~ :, I, eoeitionst fo t inhi it A i h rea oct to ia n 1j
ijis raised by Exhib a B . 'i
j. 3. More spec ically, the Council now takes and directs that 1
1j the following actions be taken: 1
ij a. With respect to paragraph 1 of Exhibit A, tho City
1 Attorney is directed to prepare and present to the Council for
:!consideration an oL•dinance or ordinances to establish a speed limit !1of thirty miles per hour along Country Club Drive to the extent
1
:such may be lawfully done, ! b, With respect to paragraph 4 of Exhibit A, the Director
j Of Public Works and the City Planner are authorized to act on
:behalf of the City of Jefferson in approving the design and con·
1_ struction of a traffic circle on that part of Country Club Drive
I· which lies between the lands o f General Growth Properties. The
!!design and construction shall be subject to the approval of the
:aforesaid city officials and! to the extent that the State Highway
:,commission retains jurisdict on over such matters! by the appropri•
;late officials or agents of the State Highway Comm aston.
; c. With respect to paragraph 5 of Exhibit A, the City
:council endorses the concept of an entrance directly off of the
.,u.s.Highway 50 Expressway into the Capitol Mall Shopping Center to
:be open at least until such time as an interchange is constructed !I at the intersection of the U.S. Highway 50 Expressway and North Ten
;1Mile Drive. The City Council, therefore, respectfully requests tha
!lthe State Highway Commission allow such entrance to be established. ! d, With respect to paragraph 7 of Exhibit A and the
;j further usage of Country Club Drive, the City Council directs the
lj Director of Public Works and the City Planner, after consulting
,with representatives of the State Highway Department, General Grow
'1Properties1 and the West Side Residential Association, to formulate 1
Hfeasible plans and proposals for Council consideration and action 'I
!)with respect to Country Club Drive and its usage, and in particular
ij specific proposals with respect to the following: ' . I
156.
---------······-··-·Regular ... Council. Meeting, .. September .. 6., .. 1977., ·-· ...... ··-. --------
-(1)-A pr~p~sal for th;-~~;;-tr~~-ti~--of ~iii~ di~~-~~f.o~·r
devices (such as traffic circles) along Country Club Drive (in :;
addition to the traffic circle in the General Growth area) ,
which would be for the purpose of slowing through traffic alorg.:
Country Club Drive and divertinf its flow. :
(2) A proposal, if feasib e, for consideration by the i
City Council relative to the presentation of a request to the :1
I
State Highway Commission to vacate a part of the one hundred ·.
foot right-of-way of Country Club Drive along each side iResolution
thereof back to the width of a normal two-lane local street ~~elating to
which sorves a residential area within Jefferson City. The 'General
City Council formally declares its intent that Country Club 'Prowth and
Drive not be expanded to a four-lane roadway, ;~ountry
1 4. Adoption of this Resolution shall not be construed to :Club Drive
:!'authorize the appropriation of any monies of the City of Jefferson :~rea.
'or the use of any funds of the City of Jefferson other than person-:;
finel costs in formulating proposals, and any proposal or action :1
'
·,which requires the expenditures of monies of the City of Jefferson ::
:shall be subject to further consideration and action by the City 1:
Council before any such expenditure is made. I'
I
Passed September 6, 1977
/s/ Robert L . Hyder
President of the Council
Approved September , 1977
/s/ Robert L. Hyder
Mayor
"Attest -/s/ Margaret Christian, City Clerk,
IMr. Alex Bartlett,
Attorney at Law,
!Jefferson City, Mo.
·I
!i
iJ
l
lnRe: Zoning of Recently Annexed 1300 Acres
·Dear Alex: !
After considering suggestions developed in yesterday's meeting !1
between you, Robert Crawford, Matthew Bucksbaum and Jeff Foss, ··
General Growth Proporties submits to you tho following proposal to ·'
resolve the apparent conflict, -
1 . Goneral Growth Properties will assist tho residents, if needed,jl
, to limit tho use of Country Club Drive in the following respects: .;
• (n) Controlled speeds on Country Club Drive. :1
II (b) Prohibition of truck traffic on Country Club Drive. '
,i 2. Zoning on the eastern side of Gonorol Growth mall area. I
'llhavo attached a copy of a plan shoot to depict for you zoning as
!you and 1 discussed on the eastern side of the mall shopping area,
tj Area A -This area is tho trapezoid shaped property on which ,1 is presently located the buffer of trees, Thoue trees will remain li
!and under zoning ordinance provision for special development ,jExhibit
·district, a special use for this area will be designated wilderness L A
area. ~
Area B -The special use designation for this 50 foot tract of ·i
1land which will run parallel to the western side of Tract A shall !i
·be 11 landscaped buffer,11 A hedge will be planted on the western i1 side of said tract as an attempt to screen auto lights. Other I,
landscaping will be completed under a landscaping plan approved by I;
the Jefferson City Planning Office which shall be governett by 11
acceptable horticultural practice. 'i
Area C -This shall be an internal service road 30 feet wide 1''
abutting and parallel to the western aide of Area B. j
Area D -This shall be a 75 foot special use designation I:
parking only and shall abut the western side of Area c and be 1
1
:
parallel thereto. !·
Area B -This area is on the south side of Country Club Drive !
and shall be a 50 foot area of landscaped bank, 1:
Area F -A 50 foot area special use deaignation 11 parking only )'li
3. We propose that the zoning and the ll\ acres shall be as :'
follows: 1:
(a) Approximately 7 acres, being that portion lying directly ,.1
north of the Hobbs Lane subdivision and the area designated as · ,.
Area A under paragraph 2 above shall be zoned R-1. !
(b) The balance of the 11 acre tract, being approaimately 4\ ''
acres and lying directly north of the shopping mall area, shall be 11
zoned C•l. II
lj ~
I
I
157.
·-----····-··-······ ......... Reaular. Council Meeting, September 6, 1977. . ... ____ ..
I
I
\
I
-----~~~-~~=~~r~~/!~w!~p~-!~~:f~'=f~~~~to~li~-~8 :etr!}t~·~:-~£;:~f . ~f .. ·-·-· -r ~Bount ry Club Drive to act as a means of slowing traffic which uaes -~
:•Country Club Drive in the future. The inside of the traffic circle
lj shall be appropriately landscaped.
:. 5, General Growth wUl accept a tempo r ary entrance off of U.S. 50
::tn addition to the two-way traffic on Country Club Drive as a means
::of reducing any traffic which may use Co~mtry Club Drive as a means
1
,
1
. of entrance into the shopping center. The request will be for
two-way traffic on the temporary entrance which will, of course{
!•necessit ate a median crossing at the entrance, It is specifica ly
i understood, however, that Country Club Drive will not be closed to
~ .. two-way traffic even if the temporary entrance is granted by the
Highway Department.
,:6. Lightinf on the eastern side of the mall property will consist
:!of poles bui t to a 25 foot height with directional light shrouded ~away from the residential area to the east,
:; 1. General Growth Properties will assist the residents on Country -
·:club Drive, if requested, to prevent the expansion of Country Club
·Drive to a four-lane road east of Gene r al Growth property lines.
·; I think this contains a complete listing of the item& we
:;discussed.
·I I look forward
;, proposal . ;l Sincerely,
to your early communication regarding this
/a/ Ronald J . Prenger
~
'IMr. Ronald J, Pr enger,
'iAttorney at Law,
!!Jefferson City , Mo.
August 10, 1977.
•I !i Dear Ron: I n Re: Zoning of Recently Annexed 1300 acres .
I ij This will serve as a follow-up to my previous l etter acknowledging
•. receipt of your letter of July 28, 1977, which ca-rries the above ~~reference and which Wlls submitted on behalf of General Grow t h
'!Properties.
~ Your proposal has boon circulated among many of the nearby
1i residents for their information. As I have previously advised you, . ·~the West Side Residential Association which we represent is an ·
;: informlll group which cannot spook in a binding fashion for: all of :
!j the resident s of the area to tho caat of Capitol Mall Shopping
1• Center site.
;I' 1 believe, however, that the following reoponso can now
; properly bo made by me to your letter of July 28, 1977:
I 1 . The ~esidents of tho area oro generally pleased with many of
the proposals which you mako in your lettor, nnd they believe 11nd
!hope that they will aid in the amelioration of tho problems that
~have developed , .
Exhibit i 2. While 1 am not in a position to bind all of the residents of n 1 the area, please be advised that the West Side Residential Associa-
~tion does not collectively interpose any objection to the S Special
!
Development District concept which is a r ticulated in your letter of
July 28, 1977.
3. You have articulated in your letter that it is the position of
General Growth that the matter of a temporary entrance from the
Highway 50 Expressway into the Shopping Center should not be
interpreted as acquiescence to a permanent closure of Country Club
Drive at the point of the old city limits, We understand this to
be your position. Likewise, we would state that "going along" with
. the proposals set forth in your letter of July 28 should not be
interpreted by General Growth or others as acquiescence to the
; position that Country Club Drive should be reopened and kept open,
i even though a direct entrance on a temporary basis onto the Highway
50 Expressway be established, Such difference of opinion on this
point though does not preclude acceptance of the proposal in other I
; respects or the temporary entrance from ·the Expressway as being .
r meaningful actions on the part of General Growth towards
~ameliorating the disputes Which have arisen,
4. We understand the provisions of paragraph 6 of your letter of
,July 28, 1977, to mean that the light poles are to be no higher 1 than 25 foot above a normal base (as you orally clarified to me).
We also understand f~o m our discussion that this lowered lighting
. would apply on the east ern side of the mall property and would not
'
be limited to that part of the property which is within the
S Special Development District ,
158.
•---------·-------··ltt~.&\llt~J:"_.C.o.unc.U . .Me~ting, .. .S.epte.mQer ... 6.,._19.71 .• _ .. :_ __ ··-··------11
Of course, this response and the action or inaction of
· residents in accepting or acquiescing to the proposals ~n•~r•••n•'
your letter of July 28, 1977, are not and should not be
idered as 8 release of any claims that may exist ,
I believe it therefore appropriate that we be in 8 position to
to the City Council for action a zoninf ordinance which is
acceptable to articulate the s Specia Development Dist
set forth in your letter together with a proposed resoJLu,;~gQI
~n'u"'"1L consideration to set in motion the various other act
emplated,
With the foregoing in mind, therefore, I would be hopeful that
we can therefore proceed in a united fashion before the City
Council at its next meeting to request it to carry forth the
proposals set forth in your letter of July 28 with the qualifica-
tions herein expressed.
Yours very truly, HENDREN AND ANDRAE,
By /s/ Alex Bartlett
Councilman Wildhaber moved that the Resolution be adopted, The
motion passed with eight Councilmen voting Aye and two Councilmen
voting Nay.
following communication was ordered to become a port of the
permanent record, on motion of Councilman Wildhabor :
• Thomas Benton,
Planner,
r•n•n,.n City J Mo ,
Dear Mr. Benton:
September 2, 1977.
I am writing on behalf of myself and my wife, Dorothy E.
Goller, and as attorney for all tho other owners, namely Robert E.
Dallmeyer, Jr., Richard P. Schneider and Charlotte C. Schneider,
his wife, E. G, Linhardt and Margorot L, Linhardt, his wife,
M. c. Rippoto and Barbara L. Rippeto his wife, and Dillie J,
Dawson, of tho real estate which io located in Section 4 Township
44 North, Rango 12 West 1 which lies south of North Ton Mho Drivo
in Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri.
Ploase bo adviood that we oro vory much in favor of tho
proposed expansion and improvements of North Ten Milo Drive. We
also realize that to comploto said improvomonts tho City of
Jefferson may need to acquire additional right·of-way, and wo are
lling to donate to tho City of Jefferson our ahara of said
additional right ·of-way south of North Ten Mile Drive up to 50 foot
from the existing right-of-way,
Further, we have discussed with rou tho City's interest in
controlling access along North Ten Mi e Drive to facilitate the
flow of traffic, and we will cooperate with you as much as possible
however, nothing contained herein shall be construed in anyway to
limit our existing right of accesseo along North Ton Mile Drive.
Very truly yours, /s/ David R. Goller .
Greg Boos, Eagle Scout, from Immaculate Conception School, was
introduced to the Council.
•' -~ - -----M Robert c. Schulte, Chairman of the Parking Authority, presented the
following report to the Council :
The Parking Authority met at 7:30P.M., TuesdayJSeptember 6, 1977,
with Robert Schulte Vincent Borgmeyer, James Tnomas, Charles
Czarlinsky, Wilbon Dill, Roger Verslues and James Hartley present .
On motion by Borgmeyer, and seconded by Dill, the Parking
Authority recommends to· proceed with an engineering contract, in
accordance with the contract· hereto attached, with Verslues and
Associates . This contract is in connection with the two parking
facilities proposed.
· /s/ Robert C. Schulte,
Chairman, Parking Authority.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNBR AND CONSULTANT
OWNER-Parking Authority CONSULTANT -R.F.Verslues & Assoc. Inc
City of Jefferson 705 E. McCarty Street,
Jefferson City, Missouri. Jefferson City, Miss
I
I
I
I
159 .
-----· -·--·-·----·· .... ...l!~~J~~-Jlp~nc~~ .. l'f~~t~~g, ..f~e.Pt;!!.!d.J.~r .. ~.1 _! 9_7]_. _________ ·--···--· •. ··-·--
1
·---FROJECr :-N~~~~ar~l~il~~~ti~ii'~~-~:-~:-~~-~s-~~~~;·------· ....
B. Jefferson Street Lot
•'
PROFESSIONAL FEES • Fee shall be based on the following rates:
I
Parking
Aut hod~
Report.,i
1
1-
A. Riley Lot: 6 1/41. Construction Coat
B. Jefferson Street Lot : 5 3/41. Const r uction Cost
Fee shall be payable as follows:
A,
c.
D,
A. Riley Lot · 351. Completion of Preliminary Design and Estimate
-857. Completion of Final Design, Drawings, Specifications,
and Bid Documents
907. Completion of. Signing Construction Contract
100% Four (4) equal payments as construction progresses
(25 -so -75 -100%) B. Jefferson Street Lot
Hourly rate for site analysis: Not to exceed $5,500.
Rate: ~25.00/hr . Principal 20.00/hr. Design
15.00/hr. Drafting
10.00/hr. Clerical
35% Completion of Preliminary Design and Estimate
This section will include the costs incurred
under part one for site analysis.
85% Completion of Final Design Drawings, Specifications
and Bid Documents
90% Completion of Signing Construction Contracts
100% Four (4) equal payments as -construction progresses
. . (25 -50 • 75 • 1007.)
**NOTE: Services for the Jafferoon Street Lot do -not include
redesign to existing buildings adjacent parking
structure. Said services shall be negotiated as
amendment to thio contract if required,
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT
RELATIONSIUP OF CONSULTAN'r TO OWNER:
The relationship of Consultant to tho Owner shall be
that of Consultant under direct Contract,
CONSULTANT'S SERVICES:
Professional oorvices shall include:
1. Consultation with tho OWner to discuss tho scope
and nature of the pro.1ect;
2. Preparation of prolimlnary studios;
3. Coordinate all field survey and sub-surface investigation;
4. Evaluntion of ·all investigations necoosory to establish
safe value;
Prepare Preliminnry Layout and Estimates;
Calculating of Design;
s.
6.
7. Preparation of detailed working drawings and coordination
with all design work;
8. Submitting adequately dimensioned and detailed-plans and
controls for· specifications relating to design requirement
9. Checking· of shop drawings and details; ·
10. Periodic visits (at Consultant's discretion in general
advisory capacity· not complete supervised inspection).
EXTRA SERVICES AND ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION:
If after Consultant's design and working drawings are
substantially complete, a major abnormal and fundamental
change to preliminary studies or working drawings or
specifications shall become necessary through no fault of
the Consultant, he shall proceed with · the· requi r ed extra · .
services upon written authorization of Owner and shall be
additionally compensated therefor br payment to him ·of a ·
sum of $25,00 per hour for Principa , $20.00 per hour for
Design, $15.00 per hour for Drafting Services, and $10,00
per hour for Clerical Services. .
RESIDENT INSPECTION: .
During the construction of the project; the Consultant will
agree to furnish resident inspect-ion services at a rate of
$12.00 per hour (not to exceed $150, per-day), Resident
services will be provided only after receipt of written
authority from the Owner.
160.
, .. _ ............ -··-· .............. .Regular .. Council. Meeting, .. Septe.mb .o,-.6 ,. 1.977, .......... ·-.......... -...... --
··-·~----·· ~-·--~--··--·---·· .. ··-·····-·----.... ._ __ ---·--·-·~·--"-·· ····-··---··-···-·-
B. ~~~~la~~R!~:e!N~oT~:;~!w data of existing site conditions, ~
utilities, etc., and shall endeavor to have the .data as ~
' complete as possible. It is the responsibility of the :·
Consultant to 'inform the Owner of any information which may be ,!
1 lacking. BoringR or test pits, structural or other tests of :
11 materiAls, equipmentl or workmanship, whether made at job or .i'
lj elsewhere, shall be turnished as may be required and Consultanq:
! shall be reimbursed for (actual cos to times 1.1) for li
.,
1
• coordination, ;
Legal surveys, topographic and utility surveys shall be !I !. furnished by the Owner and be responsible for corrections of ::
1' same. If provided by Consultant, Owner shall reimburse 1·
11 Consultant for such services at cost times 1.1 (cost x 1.1) • ,!
:i F, PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION: !·
:; Consultant will furnish all necessary plans and specifications i1
,1 and contract documents, and shall be reimbursed for actual .:
;; printing costs. Parking
!· Prints (2411 x 36 11 ) @ $. 75 each !:Authority i! Specification Copies (8 1/2 x 11) @ $.10 each ~·Report.
II
Postage at actualcost. :
G. OWNBRSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: I
·, Original tracings and documents are and shall remain the !, !1 property of the Consultant unless otherwise agreed upon. !I' :m. TERMINATION: j
1: In the event the prime contract is terminated prior to 1
!; fulfillment, and for all completed stages of this contract, j:l
il the Consultant shall be paid tho sum stipulated herein not I
1! already paid, plus actual costs of his services, including l
,, overhead. rendered for any partially completed stages to the 1!
'!' date of termination . :l
I. I, ARBITMTION : .'
:i Any controversy or claim arising out of this agreement, or !i I! broach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance !I
with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, except,'t
however. in ouch arbitration there shall be three arbitrator~ ~~
as follows : 1
1. OWner Representative I
2, A registered Design Professional !1
:; 3, A third . party selected by tho other two . 'I
i,,iACCEPTED: (OWNER) ACCEPTED: DESIGN PROFESSIONAL II /s/ Roger F. Voralues
I
.Title: Title: Resident
R.F.Vcrslucs Assoc., Inc,
Consultant
Dated at this day of 1977. I I
Councilman Rackers questioned Mr. Verslues in regard to the agree-j
ment between the owner and consultant, since it appeared to him .
that both parkinf facilities were for final design. Mr. Verslues ~
said that it wou d be done step by step as approved br the Council.~
Councilman Borgmeyer 010ved that the report and s te analysis II
be approved as outlineil. Motion passed, 1,
I
I
- - - - - - - - - -h The name of Stephen. c. Coller was submitted for appointment as !:Appointment
Probationary Police Officer, effective September 15th, jlPolice
Councilman Whitecotton moved that the appointment be approved, :i Dept.
Motion passed, · · 1:
-M - --- - - -M I' lA request to vacate a storm drainage easeme~t between Lots 272 and i:
1
273, Landwehr Hills Subdivision, Section 8, was received from ·!Street
Central Missouri Professional Services, Inc, !,committee I The request was . referred to the Street Conmittee. 'I
iA print of the proposed ;e;l;t -of Fo~ Ridge Subdivision was ~Planning &
received from Central Missouri Professional Services Inc. :!Zoning
. The replat was referred to the Planning and Zon!ng Commission.~Commission,
I Prints of the preliruin;~ ia;o~t-of Hubi; Neutzler Development ,Planning~
(Rolling Hills) were receivei:l from Central 1-lisaouri Professional ;& Zoninf
, Services, Inc. I Conmiss
The prints were referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission
I ---·-·----
' 'I • jl
I
161.
-··· .. ··--· .... ..... . Regular Council Meotina, September 6, 1977. . . -··--
··--·-····Piiinntngf ,\ .. reqii.ea·t · .to . rozo~e land for Wtndoor. Development .. C~rpora t ion iro~·--r
I & Zoning ~RS -2 to S and RD was received from Central Missouri Professional r
Conuniesfon '· Se r vices, Inc.
The r equest was r efer red to the Planning and Zoning Comrniseion.:-
Planning ·: Prints of a preliminar; ;l;t-o~ Se ~tto~ 2 of Fox Scott Subdivision ;:
& Zoning were r eceive(! from Richard s. Gr oner, Partner, Eaotlandero, ;:
Commission ·, The prints were referr ed to the Planning a n d ZoningComm ission, ~i ,• .. _________ :;
,, Appointment -The application of Steven L . McMu r try fo r the position of cleaner
Bus ·;and driver for the Transit Authority was submitt ed to the Council.
Driver._. Councilman Borgmeyer moved that the appointment be approved,
.Motion passed,
Director.Petitions were received from reoidents of Haaf Drive and North
of Public Drive for tho Council to form a Sewer Di s trict to serve their
Works and properties,
Stre et · The petitions were referred to the Director of Public Works
Co mm ittee and the Street Committee.
Missouri Petitions were r e ceived for stre e t lights for the following areas:
Power .: One light to be placed between 2711 and 2715 Schellridge West;
and Light , Lights on Ladue Road, pn:ticularly in the "cul de sac"; and
Company.: Lights to be installed at 208 -212 and 216-218 Woodridge Drive.
;:The petitions were referre d to tho Missouri Power & Light Company
·for recomm endations.
- -- -----M ~ Health ·!Councilman Hager, Chairman of the Health Commit tee, stated that
Committee:: Chester McKinney, Director of the Health Department, had requested
.:that his employees be sent to a Conference on food services at the
:i Lake of the Ozarks. It would cost $250.00 which the Council had
~approved in hie budget .
;: Councilman Hoger moved that the employees be allowed to go,
'i Motion passed.
1\
j: .,
!:
'· I; ,,
I
. -·~Councilman Whi t ecotton, Chairman of the Polico Committee,
] tho following t:<lpo r t:
II
pr esent e d !:
!:
::Tho Police Depa r tment Committee mot in the Council Chamber at 7:30
;-P.M., Wednesday, Auguot 17, 1977, just prior to tho meeting of the
.Finance Committee, Members McDowell, Hnrtofiold, Wildhaber and
·.Whitecotton wore present . Chief Patton was also present.
,= On motion of Miss 1-loDowcll! seconded by Mr. Wildhaber, Chief
;Patton was authorized to advert se for bi ds on an Automatic
:!Printer, Processor llnd Dryer fo r which the sum of $2,250.00 had
-been approved in the current Police Department budget,
Police j There being no further business the Committee adjourned,
Cotrmittee·, Respectfully submitted /a/ Thomas E. Whitecotton, Chairman,
Report.'!
1: Mr, MGyor : I might also mention that although a quorw was not
1j present, Mayor Hyder, Miss McDowell, Chief Patton and myself met
., with Mr . Jablonski and another member of the Finn of Jablonski and
:1 Aesociates1 at the Police Department Headquarters at 7:00 P ,M, ,
!';August l6tn, and reviewed a sketch of the proposed Police
I.
!·Department Building, .
I After a general discussion some suggestions were made as to ~
'
changes in the general design of the building more specifically ·
· relating to the west and north sides of the building, 1 11 It was also agreed that Mr . Jablonski would meet with Colonel 1.
I
I Patton as often as necessary to work out the size and location of 11
.;the various offices and rooms to be provided in the basement and on 1~l
I the first floor. . . . : i The next meeting with Mr. Jablonski was scheduled for . ;i September 7th, ho·wever, we were later informed by Mr. Jablonski 1j
i; that he had overlooked a prior collllllittment on that date and would ;1 :1 not be able to appear, . . . 1 t A meeting has now been scheduled for 7:00 P,M,, Monday ~
:, September 12, 1977, at Police Headquarters. 11
ll Councilman Whitecott on moved th.at the report be filed, Motion 'il
I\ passed, . . __ .,. •. -. • :i
"'
I 162.
. ······---·-·----··
.~-lit··~----·--·-·.··-··-··-·-· ·-· --·---··-·----·····-···--· -·-·--········· ---··-·-·-·-·-·· ..... --·1!-----·~ .............
Councilman Hager, Chairman of the Fire Colllllittee, presented the
folloto~ing report:
li The Fire Department Corrrnittee met on Tuesday, August 23rd in the
I• Council Chambers at 7:30 P ,M, Present were Fire Chief Willmeno
it and Council members Hoger, Rackers, Wildhaber and McDowell.
:. Chief Willmeno informed the Committee that Fireman Paul
FJohnson had been retired on a disability pension of $400,00 ~er
;'month, approved by the Pension Board, after hearing a Doctor s
•,report , Mr. Johnson· has only been on the Department for seven
~ears and this led to considerable questioning by tho Committee
;·membera,
.; Councilman Wildhober mode a motion, with a second by Mr.
·~Rackers, that an investigation be made ao to the part time job ·
' Fireman Johnson may have had that might be related to his illness.
.. Motion was carried,
; Chief Willmeno presented the applications for approval. Jack
: Brady was approved as 11 replacement for tho aforementioned Mr,
,: Johnson with employment effective September 15th, Annual Salary
,: $8,115 Jo, Other applicants approved for employment November lot,
::are aa follows: Jock Howard "Kenneth Finke • Roy Thompson-at
·ian Annual Salary of $8 1 115.60. Committee members based their
;: approval on the recorrmendation of the Fire Chief,
;; Councilwoman McDowell asked Chief Willmeno why do the trucks
;: use High Street \~hen going east to 11 fire . Fire Chief Will me no
:; ropliod simply that in many cases High Street is the shortest
•; distance to the fire.
1: Chief Willmeno made a strong plea for an additional fire
!;fighting unit to bo used to fight fireo at gasoline bulk plants,
jt chemical plants and such factories as McGraw-Edison and others ,
j!Also included would be Airport firesi such os crushed planes, etc,
!This Unit would be a dry powder mobi e truck.
·1 Councilman Rackers mado a motion. with a second by Wildhaber,
,~ that Chief Hillmeno advertise for a 4 -wheel drive truclt and to
. equip it as needed, Tho total amount should bo approximately .
1:$25,000, which amount would be taken out of Hoovy Equipment Vund:
·. It was called to tho Committee's attention that a Police
I'· Captain 'a maximwn salary stwwn in 11 recent report by the Account !I
1 ana Claims Colllllittee, ta bo grantor t:han the maximum salary of tho
.j Fire Chief, who is responsible for many thouonnds of dollars worth
l!of equipment, Tho maximum for 11 Polico Captain is $18 1 720,00 ~ · Firo Chief is 17,250,00
I. The Committee promised Fire Chiof Willmono this would bo looked .! into,
11 Meeting ad.iournod at 9:30 P ,M, :! Respectfully submitted, /s/ Harvey Hoger,
!I Chairman ,
'
'!councilman Hager moved that tho report be filed, Motion passed,
i Councilman Hager moved that the Council advertise for the dry
lj powder mobile truck, to be paid for out of Heavy Equipment Funds.
t· Motion passed,
:1 Councilman Wildhaber. Ch~i~n -~f ~h; Fi~ance Cormnittee, presented
1: the following report:
1:
.li The Finance Committee meeting held in the Council Chambers, August
I 17th, 7:30 P,M, I· The ColiUIIittee heard a report given by Bill Rootes on the City
1!Audit. After the report the following motions were made and ·
·!adopted,
!• Motion made by Ed Rackers that the Public Streets, Expressway
ij' and Right-of~way Fund money be transferred to Capital Improvements
. Fund and these Funds be terminated . Motion passed.
! Motion made by George Hartsfi'eld that Treasurer show itemized li investment of funds by amounts and maturity dates and where
.Fire
.comnittee
Report .
..
'·
l<'inanco
Committee
Jleport,
invested, Motion passed,
Motion made by Darrel Gordon that the Park Board be instructed,:
· to have adequate liability insurance! adequate limits of liability :
insurance in general and auto liabil ty, Motion passed, ';
Co0111ittee heard from Joe Biels in regard to P ,A, System for the::
Council Chambers , Motion made by Darrel Gordon that specifications•;
be drafted for a P ,A, Sysl:em for the Council Chambers, Specs to ::
include that all special equipment provided be from tho same ··
Company, adequate to do the job, anCI that we advertise for bids. !l
Motion passed.
Respectfully submitted , /a/ Ken Wildhaber, Chairman.
I
I
I
163.
·-·----· .. -·---·· ...... -~~g~l~.~ C.9~nc1~ !1e~_ti,-.s, .. $~pt;~mb9r 6, .'J-91 .1 .•... -·· . _ ........... __ ..
I
I
councilmiin-w-1Tiiiliib-a·r:-·rncived ··t:it~i · t'h·;-t:-e'Pc>.,£ be ·ii18d. --Mo.ti;;~ .. p~sse'd ;-·--·----·-r l. Councilman Gordon, Chairman of tho Street Co!Miittee, presented :.
·.the following report: i!
!l ~ 'i Meeting of the StreetCommi.ttee held Tuesday 1 September 6th, in the :;
;• Co\D\cil Chamber, and made the following recoll'aTiendat ions: ::
/ 1. Hire Cindy L. Rozier at · the Department of Public Works, at ·:
;:$530.00 per month, as Receptionist-Typist, with 4% increase at the ll end of six months.
'i 2. Merit raises for Herb Goeller and Jerry Heckman of $30.00 per
~month starting October let, was approved,
!; 3. Approved ~150,00 for Tom Benton to attend Building Officials
't Conference at Lake Ozark a.
:14. Approved $600.00 for Lea Parschal to attend Water Pollution
Street ·.Control Federation.
Colllllittee:j 5 .a. Approved 3 additional blocks of downtown area for overlay:
Report •. : 200 block Jefferson; 400 block East High; 200 block Ada.ms •
. · b. Oeorfe Hartsfield appeared before the Committee to request
,: additions overlay of streets in the west end -Boonville Road
·'207·317, Ridgewny Drive, Livingston, Norris Drive and Industrial !i Drive. After some discussion the Department of Public Works was
.1directed to determine additional streets throughout the City for !I possible overlay -with funds which would be loft in the Capital
, Improvement Budget. .
11 6. Approved payment of overrun for drainage structures on Grant I
i1Street Project in the amount of $14 1 852.39, Pavement will be made I
;from Capital Improvement Fund to Housing Authority. · ~ ~7. Approved Capital Improvement Funds for payment of $7,000.00 to
;, Calloway County Special Rood District for rebuilding of bridge. I
-! 8, Allowed Ron McMillan to withdraw his request to vacate a 20 1
ljalley adjacent to 510 Jackson Street, and granted him permiesion to.1
:1 use area for parking of people living in building. · I
lj 9. Instructed the Department of Public Works to contact George ~
:, Minzo on Haaf Drivo in regard to curb and gut tor settling and ~
•'1 ponding wator in front of his residence. · t·
: 10·, Approved the selling of City R/W along Grant Street for $500. ~
;iThuy would still be assessed $650.00 for tho improvement of Grant •i
1! Street.
!! Robart Di.ppold•.and James I.oooch .. employment applications
::considered @ $3.25 per hour in General Maintonanco Category {11.
:1 Merit raise requested for Herb Huhman fr,lm $4.41 to $4.61 per
:
1
· hour. Movod to approve by Mr. Robinoon, seconded by Dorgmoyer and
' motion passed. !: Respectfully submitted, /s/ Darrel Gordon ,~
y
'I
~ ~!Councilman Gordon move~ ~h~t. t~e. r~p~r~ ~e filed. Motion p~soed, j;
Cable ;I Councilwoman McDowell 11tated that the International Telemeter :1
TV. :Company had still not hooked up some twenty applicants who live H
1 within the required 500 1 • • · · · t i! Mayor Hyder said that their problem is lack of funds and . ~
,. trained personnel. · ·. ·• ·
•
1
·1 Councilman •Hartsfield moved that representatives of Internatio -
.al Telemeter be asked ·to appear before the Council to explain the
:1 financial statements which were sent· to·· the Council. · Motion passed;
l·i Councilman Robinson· requested that they also bring an up to
:date audit·. • ·
Parking I The. following report of th~ Pa;ktn; Auth~rity was preo~nted to .the
Authority i Council: . · · . . . ,.
Report. · .
I
1 The Parking Authority met at 9:00 A.M.~ Tuesday, August 23 1977
1• with Robert Schulte, Vincent Borgmeyer, F, E• Robinson, Wilben Dh~
;! James Thomas, Mike Bates, Roger Verslueo·, and James Hartley . ~
'• present,· Charles Czarlinsky was out of town~ · ~
i: ·Roger Versiues, engineering· consultant, presented·a· report·,on I' ~the different possible sites for additional parking garages in the ~
•1 downtown area, · Theo sites·-discussed ·the lot next· to the Jefferson ~
!!Building, a lot· next to the Missourl Power & Light Company~ th& lot ~
Jnext to the Big B Cleaners. and a lot on McCarty and A~ams Street. ~
:i It was determined after much discussion by businessmen and i'
!j members that the lot next to the· Jefferson Bui·lding and the lot ~
lj behind the parking garage showed much more interest· and demand than .j
1 the other three sites, which were considered too far from the core ~ I area, . . . · :'
I 164,
·-···· -· ......... _ ....... Reaular Council Meeting,. September 6, 1977. . . ... ---·---··-
-1 ~~--~~~~~~~~b~~T~~:-a~i-~~f ;sf~o~:~fe-~f et~~·;;~~-~-~~~r~~~i ~f~~~t~~~ ·-. ~-~two parking garagos, one next to tho Jofferson Building and ono next I
ii to the parlting garage. Revenue Bonds were recommended to finance ·.
!the structures, :;
I! The vote was Thomas and Dill in favor, Borgmeyer and Bates :
!j against. Chairman Schulte broke the tie in favor. Czsrlinsky
: voted absentee in favor making the final vote 4 to 2 in favor. i'
:: /s/ Robert c. Schulte, !_', li Chairman, !'
!j The report was . ordered filed. t
li The following report of ~h; Airport Commission was presented to the 1:
!!CO\mcU: :
'iA meeting of the Airport Co11111ission was hold at 12:30 p.m., Tuesday J·
,'August 23, 1977, at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport. Those ·
'1 present were: Mr. Hugo Ochsner, Vice Chairman; members present weta
·Munzell, Bates, Whitecotton, Ott, Gordon, Borgmeyer, Miller and A~port
;Rackers. Also present were J. Stauffer, News Tribune and John Commission
,: Randolph, Airport Manager, Report.
1
: Tho minutes of the July 26, 1977, meeting were presented and ·
~there being no objections or corrections z.rr, Miller made a motion
11
• to accept the minutes as presented, The motion was seconded by
Mr. Munzell and unanimousl~ adopted, !I The financial report for August, 1977, was presented, After
~discussion Mr. Gordon made a motion· to approve the report. The
qmotion was seconded by Mr. Ott and unanimously adopteij,
·; Mr. Randolph r41ported that he had talked to Mayor Hyder about !;
''tho Lincoln Property transfer. Mr. Hyder said that all the ·,
'· documents had been forwarded to Dr. Frank of the University and thad:
1; he had not heard anything from him. !;
!. Mr. Randolph requested travel authorization to attend the ··
,I Airport Operators Council meeting in Las Vegas, September 18 thru
!. September 23. After the discussion, Mr. Whitecotton made a motion '" I
:to approve the travel authorization, seconded by Mr. Borgmeyer, and ··
:. unanimously approved, ·,
• Mr. Ott reported that tho steel was beginning to arrive for
j the construction of tho New Jefferson City Flying Sorvico hangar
:and that erection should begin sometime this week, ·
;! Mr. Randolph reported that the F.A.A. had approved the overlay
,: paving on the 30/12 runway. They have not approved the shoulders.
~Jefferson Asphalt will start reworking the shoulders someday this
j.week and when the work is aatisf4ctory, tho F.A.A. will be
II requested to make a final inspection for tho entire job.
, Mr. Randolph reported that he had attended a meeting of the .
. ~City Council Finance Committee regarding the 1977-78 budget rece:l.v-.
~ ing several guidelines regarding the budget pro·.1oos. He planned to .
,1 have a meeting with the budget and finance committee of the Airport ,
~ Coamisoion within tho next ten days when he will have a preliminary ;: ~budget ready for their action. · '1
The Central Trust Bank presented an Assignment of Real Estate ;,
Release and Agreement, giving them the right to assume the lease of !' '! theNew Jefferson City Flying Service, should they default in their '•
1 payment to the City. Mr. Randolph reported that Mr. Hendren had :;
11 reviewed the form and that with certain changes in the form, it ·:
11 would be acceptable, After diacussion1 Dr. Miller made a motion to ~
·I authorize the Chairman of the Airport liommioaion to sign the ··
!·document provided the necessary changes, as requested by him, were
I' included. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ott and unanimously
; adopted.
:; "The purchase of a new fire department foam truck by the Fire
f Department waa discussed, Chief Willmeno had reported that the :I funds were available for the unit at an estimated cost of $25,000,
~· During the discussion it was pointed out that such addition would ~be of great value should an emergency occur on the airport involv·
:! ing an aircraft fire. After discussion, Dr. Miller maae a motion
!j that the Jefferson City Airport Commiss1on go on record as ~'i' reco11111ending the purchase of the above mentioned truck as an addi· I
tional safety factor for the traveling public using the airport,
I
The motion was seconded by Mr. Ott and unanimously adopted.
Mr. Randolph suggested that the September meeting of the . I Airport Colllllission be held on the 4th Thursday of September :!
1 (September 29, 1977) due to the fact that he would not be returning; ! from the AOCI meeting until the 27th of September. After diecus• ;_
don, Dr. Miller made a motion to call the September meeting on :;
f!
I 165.
····-. ··-···· _ ·-· ··-. _ .. ___ . .. .Regular Council Meet1118 1 September 6, l977, . _ .. _ ··-·--· ... ····
1
-····-·· ·····--··-r ::~~~d~~~~·~9 Mr ~\~ti~~~-~~~~~o!~~~~~:~~~~~~ty -!:t~i~~~~~ ·~~t 1~~-·;a;--·r -
ij A discussion was held regarding the installation of limited ·
. :time parking signs on the · front row of the parking lot, It was ; .;l pointed out that cars were parking on the front row sometimes as •I
!much as a week at a time. .After discussion, Mr. Gordon made a
··motion to install signs on the front row of the parking lot for a
!; trial period of 90 days, limiting the parking in that area to a
:• maximwu of two hours. Seconded by Mr. Borgmeyer and unanimously
·~ dopted, Mr. Bates, Public Works .Director, said ·that he would see 1i
. that the signs were made and installed as soon as possible, il ~; There ·being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at !i
:1:15 P.M. · li
! Respectfully -submitted, /s/ John 8, Randolph :.1
·' Assistant Secretary.
j;The report was ordered_ f~l~d: _ • _ _ _ _ !!
Bill 62.::Bill No, 62, introduced by Councilman Borgmeyer! entitled: !i
Voting ·:"An Ordinance of · the City of .Jefferson, Missour , amending :'
Precincts :ordinance No. 9022, which established voting precincts in the wards !:
. of the City and defined the boundaries thereof." :l
:: Road drat and second time by title and ordered distributed to 11
·members of the Council. li
--- - - - --- -1 Bill 63, .;Bill No. 63, introduced by Councilman Borgmeyer entitled: •·
Transfer; "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missourl to purchase ::
of land:: forty-two (42) acres in Callaway County, Miss our!, and to exchange t•
to Lincoln t that parcel for a like tract of forty-two (42) acres adjoining the 11
Univorsity ;Jefferson City Memorial Airport; and authorizing and directing the II
· :,Mayor and City Clerk on behalf of the City of Jefferson to make, 'jl
I
:execute and ·dolivor all proper and sufficient writings, deeds or i
instruments to effectuate tho terms and provisions of this ~I
·ordinance. 11 • . ij
·; R(!ad first and second time by title and on motion of Council· 1.
:• !lllln Borgmeyer, tho rules woro suspended and tho Bill was read the ,,
third time by title and · placed on final passage and was pa98ed by 'i
tho following voto as Ordinance No. 9024: ·:
CouncUmon voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Urant, Gordon, Hager, llartsfield~;
McDowell, ·Racltars, ·Robinson,. Whitecotton :;
and Wildhuber.
'Councilmen voting Nay: ·None ·
'Councilmen absont: None. ... ,: .. -.. --
Dill 64. Bill No. 64, introduced by Councilman Gordon, ontitlod: . ;1
Contract-'11An Ordinance of tho City of Jefferson, Miasouri, authorizing and !!
Cedar directing the Mayor and tho Clerk of· the City to execute an ,
City. · Adendum to the contract with Cedar Cit{ for tho treatment of sowage'J,
Read first and second time by tit e and ordered distributed ~~
, to members of tho Coun~i~. __ ~ ____ .. · !'
Biil 65. Dill No, 65, introduced by Councilman Gordon, entitled:
Vacating .·"An ·Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, vacatin and
Holiday ;and 91, Holiday Hills Estates,.Section 3, reserving to the City an
Hills ·,easement in the right of way vacated for sanitary sewer surface •
Estates,:, water drainage, and public utility purposes, and authorizing and
,'directing the Hayor and Clerk of the City to eKecute all instrumen
· · ,!required to confirm in the abutting property owners their right of
· :~reversion in the vacated area ,11 .
,' Read first and second time by title and ordered< distributed I'
.: to members of the Coun~i!\ _ ~ _ •: _ ,. ... ,j
Bill 66 •.i Bill No, 66, introduced by Councilmen Hager and Hhitecotton, j:
Amending· entitled: ~·. Parking r "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, amending
ani .{Ordinance No. 8177, The Parking and Traffic Code, by :prohibiting
Traffic ·~ parking on a portion of Madison Street, 11 i
I Code, :j . Read first and ·second time by title and on ·. motion of· Council-j(
;i man Brant i the rules ·were. suspended and the Bill was read the third d
~~time by t1tle and placed on final ·passage and was passed by the 11
1 following vote as Ordinance No. 9025: · . · · ·: .\ · · 1 1 Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Gordon, :Hager!· Hartsfielct,l.
~ · McDowell1 Rackers, Robinson, Wh tecotton ·i· I' and Wildnaber,
ij Councilmen voting Nay: None
~!Councilmen absent: None,
,..
166,
Regular Council Meeting, September 6, 1977,
·--~8iii -·N~·:···67·,·--1nt-~~du~~d -·by --C~~~ci:tme~ ii~-ger a·u"d ifu"it-~c~tt~u",
ijentitled: .
~"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Nissouri, amending
,•Ordinance No. 8177, The Parking and Traffic Code, by prohibiting
:1parking on a portion of East Miller Street betw en the hours of
:.eight o'clock a.m., and four o'clock p.m."
;: Read first and second time by title and ordered distributed
;!to members of the CoW\cil.
;1Bill N~. 68 1 .introduced by Co~n~iim;n-M~D~;li and Borgmeyer,
!"entitled: ·.
,:"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, accepting and
·,approving the J>lat of Medical Park Subdivision, a subdivision of
.:the City of Jefferson, Missouri, as hereinafter described,"
;· Read first and second time by title and ordered distributed
:'to members of the Council.
~~Bill No. 69, introduced by Co~n~iim;n-n~rim;y~r and McDowell,
:'entitled:
.-"An Ordinance of the City of Jcfferoon1 Missouri, accepting and
:approving the plat of Spring Valley Subdivision, Section Two, a
:,subdivision of tho City of Jefferson, Missouri 1 as hereinafter
:'described."
!j Read first and second time by title and ordered distributed
tjto members of the Council.
!J • .. --.. ~ - ----
t•Bill No. 70, introduced by Councilmen Rackers and Brant, entitled:
j~ "An Ordinance of tho City of Jefferson, Missouri, accepting and
f approving the plot of Camelot South Subdivision, Section Two, a
,:subdivision of tho City of Jefferson, Missouri, as hereinafter
;:described," . . -.
. : Read first and .second time by title and ordered distributed
'to members of tho Council.
1:8111 No, 11, introduced by Councilmen Wildhabor and Robinson,
,_ontitlod: .
;: "An Ordinance of tho City of Jefferson, Missouri, accepting and
:approving the plot of Loando Addition, Section Ono, a subdivision
·,of the Cit)' of Jofforoon, Missouri, ao horolnaftor tloscribod."
' Rood first and second time by title and ordorod distributed
; to members of tho Council.
[Iii"li "67:··· -----
Amending I Parking
and
Traffic
Code.
Bill 68 .
Plat of
Medical
Park
Subdivision.
Bill 69,
Plat of
Spring
Valley
Subdivision,
Bill 70.
Plat of
Camelot
South Subdv.
Section Two •
Bill 71. I Plat of
Lonnda
Add,
Section Ono.
'iBill No. 55, introduced by Co~n~iim~n M Wtldh~b~r and Robinson, Bill 55,
:;entitled: · Amending
f:"An Ordinance of tho City of Jefferson, Mioaouri, changing, Zoning
.,amending and modifying the Zoning Map of tho City of Jefferoon, by Map,
!amending Ordinance 8508, by rezoning property located in tho Ed-Nor
1! East Subdivision of tho City of Jefferson, from RSM4 Single Family
;:to RA Multiple Dwelling ," . ;I Bill No. 55 woo read the third time by title and placed on .
i final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance ,
I No. 9026: .
!Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Gordon, Hager! Hartsfield,·
11 McDowell, Rockers, Robinson, Wh tecotton
1' andWildhaber.
!'!Councilmen voting Nay: None
1 Councilmen absent: .None.
,I .•
-!Bill No. 56, introduced by Councilmen Hager and Whitecotton, ·.Bill 56. i: entitled: . "Amending
;: "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Hissouri, changing, amendinl$· Zoning
nand modifying the Zoning Map of the City of Jefferson by amending . Map,
nordinance 8508, by rezoning property located -in the Wolff's
•1 Subdivision of the City of Jefferson, from RD Duplex to M2 General
I Industrial." :~ Bill No. 56 was read the third time by title and placed on
:;final ~assage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance
.: No. 90 7:
i: CoW\cUmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Gordon, Hager! Hartsfield,
;; · McDowell, Rackers, Robinson, Wh tecotton
r, and Wildnaber.
i: Councilmen voting Nay: None
:: CoW\cilmen 41bsent: . None.
fi
I
I
167.
--·--··· ··-·---······--·R.esY.1..~~ ... G9u.t1cil .M~et;1,ng, ~~Ptlil!!ll.>~l-: -~-~--~n.7. .. -.. ·······----·· ·---······-
I
I
·~ ~!~1 o~~in~~~e i~~;~~~~~ft~y~~~~i~!~~~~~~ro=~~~il. e~~~~~~~~~~;· a:~--t-
~directing the Mayor and the City Clerk of said C ty to execute on i
~behalf of the City, a lease on certain property at the Jefferson
!:City Memorial Airport leased to the New Jefferson City Flying
;; Service Inc. 11
'· Bih No. 57 was read the third time by title and placed on
Bill 57,:! final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance
Lease liNo. 9028:
Airport jCouncilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Gordon, Hager! Hartsfield
J .c. 11 McDowell 1 Rackers, Robinson, Wh tecotton ·
Flying ~ and Wildnaber,
Service ·'I Councilmen voting Nay: None
1, Councilmen absent: None ,
I .. ----·-Bill 60. :; Bill No, 60, introduced by Councilman Borfmeyer entitled:
Salaries !! "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, M esour!, fixing the
of City :; salaries of City Appointive Officials and Employees, and repealing
Officials;.Sections 2 through 11 of Ordinance No. 8503 of the City! and all
and ;j other Ordinances of the City, or parts thereof, in conf ict
&lployees ;: herewith. 11
:• Councilman Borgmeyer moved that Bill No. 60 be amended by
i adding the following to the Department of Planning and Code
1 Enforcement:
I
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
Monthly Annual Monthly Annual
!Administrative
j'l Secretary $747.00 $ 8,964.00 $954.16 $11,450,00
i,Planner 850.00 10,200.00 1,033.00 12,396.00
·I !1 Motion passed by the following vote:
'!!Councilmen voting Aye : Borgmeyer, Brant, Gordon, Hager! Hartsfield
; McDowol1 1 Rackers, Robinson, Wh tecotton
11 and WUdnaber. :i Councilmen voting Nay: None 'I Councilmen absent: None .
~Councilman Rockers stated that the Bill should be mora consistent
.; in regard to stop aystcm. Tho Polico Dopllrtmont has logical step
:. and spreads, in tho Firo Dopartmont tho difference between Fire jj
:1~ Fighter II and Driver ia $11.00; Health Deportment, the difference ,
botweon Animal Control Officer 1 and 11 ia $9,00; Airport, tho t·
!·Control Tower Chief's mnximwn ie higher than the Manager, and shoul~
jbe in final form bofore baing adopted.
lj Councilman Hartsfield stated that he agreed with Councilman
!: Rackars .
il Bill No. 60 was read tho third timo by title and placed on
:' final passage and waa passed by tho following vote as Ordinance
i No, 9029, as amended:
Councilman voting Ayo: Borgmoror, Brant, Gordon, Hagor,Hartsfield,
MoDowo 1, Robinson, Whitecotton and
Wildhaber,
Councilmen voting Nay: Rockers,
Councilmen absent: None,
Bill 49, Bill No. 49, introduced by Councilmen Hager and Whitecotton,
Amending entitled:
& Traffic Ordinance No. 8177, The Parking and Traffic Code of the C ty of
Code. Jefferson, by reducing the speed limit on a portion of North Ten
Parking I"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, amendinf
Mile Drive and on a portion of South Country Club Drive, to
~Thirty Miles per hour,11
Councilman Whitecotton moved that Bill No. 49 be removed from
the Informal Calendar and tabled, Motion passed,
Computor., Councilman Borgmeyer i~f~~ed ~h; Co~n~ii that his Committee had me
~with the County Court in regard to a computor system, Central Data
I! presented their program. It would cost the City between forty and
I j: fifty thousand for them to do the tax bills,
j Councilman Brant asked.if th; Mitcheil·P;operty could be condemned,!
1 so that the extension of Bllis Blvd. could be completed, He 11!
Bxtensio suggested that the Housing Authority be authorized to appraise the :1 of Ellis' property. II
Blvd J • - - ----
I Councilman Hager moved that the Council adjourn, under the rules. j'
Adjournment~ Motion passed. ___ • _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
January 12, 2015
Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission
320 East McCarty Sh·eet
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
RE: The Country Club Drive Mall Development
Dear Sirs,
Because we live on Country Club Drive we have been closely
following the developments of the Capitol City Mall. It has come
to our understanding that a new proposal will be heard this week
by you, the Planning and Zoning Commission.
We are defmitely not against any new development regarding the
mall or our city but we are very concerned about our neighborhood
and are asking that you think very hard about the Planning Staff
Report that will be placed before you by the new owners.
We believe that you should stand by the contract that was written
in 1977. This contract was very carefully composed to protect the
residents that surround the area and should absolutely not be
overlooked or revised.
Please do the right thing and not give this new proposal carte
blanche approval.
Thank you,
Owt~
/ J~ and Jeanette Dulle
3319 Country Club Drive
Jefferson City, Missouri 65109
Ce.: C oun~i {l'l!e..Y\ 'JJ.,b Scriv111U o...t( Ken Hvsse./
January 14, 2015
Department of Planning and Protective Services, Planning Division
John G . Christy Municipal Building/City Hall
320 East McCarty Street, Room 120
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Re: Case No. P15001
3600 Block of Country Club Drive
3700 Block ofW. Truman Boulevard
To Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission:
I am a home owner in the Country Club Drive Neighborhood, specifically Hobbs Ln. As my home is
very close to the Capital Mall Property, I am very concerned about the change in zoning from C-1
Neighborhood Conm1ercial to C-2 General Commercial and the approval of the Special Exception Use
Permit.
My primary concern with the change in zoning is the potential for development of new businesses
which should not be allowed near a residential neighborhood. As I understand it, most of Missouri
Boulevard is zoned C-2 This area is an example ofthe type of businesses and development which are
exactly the opposite of what most people want adjacent to their homes. Although the area on Country
Club Drive near the mall has commercial businesses, it is cettainly not in the same category as
Missouri Boulevard. To change the zoning of the Capital Mall properties to C-2 will open the area up
to all types of commercial businesses including 24-hour drive throughs, Gas Stations, Convenience
Stores, Tobacco and Liquor Stores, etc. Tllis potential is not limited only to vacant lots. It is not out of
the realm of possibility for the entire Capital Mall building to be demolished and be completely
redeveloped (Example -Biscayne Mall in Columbia). Providing the area with a C-2 zoning has the
potential to have a huge negative impact upon our neighborhood.
The Plam1ing StaffRepmt dated January 15, 2015 contains the following information related to the
rezoning and Special Exception Use Permit:
Staff Analysis and Recommendations:
The owner/developer has a plan for redevelopment of the Capital Mall and is requesting a
Special Exception Use Permit and a change from a C-1 to C-2 to "bring the zoning of the
propetty into better alignment with the high traffic commercial use".
Staff recommendations show the propetty would not comply with the requirement of a C-2 area
as the lighting "exceeds the maximum standard of3.0 footcandles in a C-2 district". (Lighting
of the propetty adjacent to our neighborhood, specifically excessive lighting, is a detriment).
The exception shall be approved only if the Commission fmds the use and plan will not
"substantially and permanently injure the appropriate use of neighboring property." and will
not "cause traffic, parking or environmental problems"
Review of the City Council Meeting Minutes, dated September 6, 1977 reveals agreements made at
that time between the original developer and residents of the adjoining property. At that time, the
Council directed the following:
Mall property owners will assist residents with "Controlled speeds on Country Club Drive."
In the area adjacent to the residential homes, a wilderness area be maintained (this is the
trapezoidal area on the very West edge of the Mall property). In addition, a 50 foot tract of land
rmming parallel to the wilderness area shall be a "landscaped buffer" including a hedge to
screen auto lights. Next would be a 30 foot se1vice road, and finally a 75 foot parking area .
The area on the south side of Country Club shall have a 50 foot area "landscaped bank" and the
adjacent 50 foot of space would be limited to parking.
The light poles in the eastern side of the Mall property will be "25 foot height with directional
light shrouded away from the residential area to the east".
I ask that City keep their word and maintain these requirements.
The developers have suggested replacing the current island separating the residential area from the
conunercial area with a roundabout. After driving around the city and viewing other roundabouts, I am
convinced that replacing the island would decrease the visual separation between the two areas and
increase the commercial look. The addition of a roundabout would increase the amount of hard surface
and decrease the amount of vegetation and visual barrier. Our current island has four street signs
related to it. As I have seen with other round a bouts, they have tlu·ee to four signs per inlet. This would
more than double the amount of street signs in that area . I request the developers maintain the currant
island and improve the landscaping to separate the areas .
In conclusion, I request that the zoning should be maintained as C-1. I understand the current buildings
on the property do not meet all the standards for this designation. I am not sure how the City allowed
the property to be developed inappropriately for the zoning, but as the saying goes -"Two wrongs don't
make a right". Please maintain current zoning to protect out neighborhood from future detrimental
development. Do not allow the developers to reduce the amount of "buffer" area from our
neighborhood . Do not let them decrease the amount of landscaping which helps to designate our area
as residential. Do not allow lighting and signage at excessive heights , visible in our area. Do not allow
a roundabout to be added.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
a~~;t(e ~
Can1ille McClain
3416 Hobbs Ln .
Jefferson City, MO 65109
Stratman, Anne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr. Eichelberger,
McMillan, Janice
Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:32 PM
'jim_eichelberger@embarqmail.com'; Stegeman, Ellen
Barron, Eric; Stratman, Anne
RE: Web site message from :Jim From Planning and Protective Services
comment/complaint form
Th ank your for your comments . I have copied Eric Ba r ron, senior planner, on this email. Your email will be printed for
the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission for their conside r ation.
Janice McMillan, AICP
Director, Department of Planning & Protective Services City of Jefferson, Missouri 65101
320 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Email jmcmillan@jeffcitymo.org
Direct 573.634.6424
Main 573.634.6410
-----Original Message-----
From: jim eichelberger@embarqmail.com [mailto:jim eichelberger@embarqmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4 :24PM
To: Stegeman, Ellen
Cc : Grellner, David
Subject: Web site message from:Jim From Planning and Protective Services comment/complaint form
As a homeowner near the capital mall, I am all for renovations and improvements to the area, however, I would like to
request that you put a temporary hold on their request for rezoning and other changes, until there can be a meeting of
the area homeowners, the mall owners, and the city council. There is a
1977 city council resolution th at set guidelines that the owners of the mall had to adhere to, to protect the surrounding
resi dentia l neighborhoods.
Some of those guidelines are being changed to the detriment of our neighborhood with the current mall proposal and
those changes should not be allowed
Jim Eichelberger
3320 Country Club Dr.
Jefferson City
MO
65109
5736355179
jim eichelberger@embarqmail.com
Stratman, Anne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Ms. Raaz,
Barron, Eric
Tuesday, January 13, 2015 5:06 PM
'walktrailside@hotmail.com'
Stratman, Anne
RE: Rezoning of Capital Mall
Thank you for your comments. They will be printed and delivered to the Planning and Zoning Commission members at
their meeting on Thursday evening (January 15).
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Senior Planner
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: susan [mailto :walktrailside@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:28PM
To: Stratman, Anne
Cc: Bobby; susan; Jeff Raaz
Subject: Rezoning of Capital Mall
Planning and Zoning for Jefferson City, Missouri
My name is Susan Bregant Raaz and I write on behalf of my mother, Barbara Bregant, who has been a
landowner/resident at 3435 Country Club Drive since December of 1967.
My parents worked very hard and were lucky enough to be able to build the home of their dreams on this
property located in an area of Jefferson City they love.
My parents also purchased additional acreage to provide a buffer zone once Highway 50 was expanded to four
lanes (behind the Bregant, Tergin and Shell properties).
I vividly remember the anguish they felt when it was learned that the beautiful land down the road was
becoming a mall. I remember my mom and dad describing the meetings and hard work the residents of Country
Club Drive and Hobbs Lane put in to work with General Growth and the City Council to assure that their
beautiful neighborhood would survive this major development.
In 2009 I moved back to Jefferson City. My husband and I have been residents on Country Club since
9/2014. I have been to the mall and agree that it is not successful (especially since I came from the Columbia
area and was witness to the difference in their mall's success).
I was relieved when a local, respected family took the task on of improving this prope1ty. After attending the
mall meeting with P & Z, though, my mother and I do have major concerns with the rezoning of this prope1ty.
1. The original intent of residents living next to the mall WAS NOT to live next to a propetty reflecting
what we see ·on Missouri Blvd (which was the example repeatedly given as to what the change in zoning
will allow).
2. At the meeting it seemed to be a big mystery where the concrete island on Countty Club had come
from. Minutes from September 6, 1977 clearly show that "the Director of Public Works and the City
Planner are authorized to act on behalf of the city of Jefferson in approving the design and constmction
of a traffic circle on that part of Country Club Drive". Since the meeting I 've checked out local
roundabouts and feel the concrete island should stay. It provides more of a visual screen with its
landscap ing and people whip through local roundabouts just as quickly as I see them go around this
banier. If the city doesn't want to maintain the landscaping, I'm sure those of us living in this area can
do so.
3. I have concems about a roundabout that provides access to the pro petty next to Red Lobster and that
propetty becoming an available lot. Again, the minutes from September 6, 1977 state "Area E-This
area is on the south side of Country Club Drive and shall be a 50 foot area of landscaped bank." That lot
is small and when looking at the plan I wonder if the developers are actually planning more access from
Highway 50 West (which would mean the property (bluffs) buffering Bregant/Tergin and Shell
propetties would have to be blasted for the ramp). Obviously not acceptable to us.
4. These type of malls are obsolete. When I visit family in the StLouis and Kansas City areas, the new
developments are open air with direct access to individual stores and restaurants. I think it crucial that
development in this area be more carefully thought out with a look at cunent and future retail
trends. Not a quick fix that further diminishes the adjoining properties/neighborhoods .
5. I am in disagreement with the request to decrease the size of the eastem "landscape tract" (next to the
"wildemess tract") in order to straighten the outside road circling the mall by the theater and Dillard's. I
feel the road can easily be straightened within the already available parking lot area.
6. I disagree with the plan to make the grassy area on Countty Club closest to Hobbs Lane an available
lot. Obviously the City Council felt it imperative to protect the Hobbs Lane neighborhood with the
parameters set in meeting minutes in 1977. I don't understand changing that philosophy and moving
traffic and businesses even closer to those residences.
7 . I'm concemed that the plan calls for signage and lighting height outside of cunent allowed
specifications.
8. I'm very concerned that as you drive the periphery of the mall (especially the eastern "wilderness" tract
abutting Hobbs Lane) there is lots of trash. I am out almost daily and have NEVER seen anyone picking
up trash. It looks honible.
9. The mall is not ADA compliant. I recently had to get mall security to assist me in holding doors open
so that I could get my mother (in a wheelchair) into the mall. The security guard confided to me that he
has repeatedly told the mall manager this is an issue and nothing has changed.
Again, our family does appreciate a local developer that's willing to come in and make this blighted area
better. However, we hope that the Council sees the absolute necessity that any improvements not further
diminish adjoining neighborhoods and that those neighborhoods be involved in fmther discussions/planning.
Sincerely,
Susan Bregant Raaz
Barbara Bregant
2
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information p lease visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
3
January 13, 2015
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Planning Division
John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
RE: Case NO . P15001
To Whom It May Concern:
RECEIVED
JAN 1 3 2015
i reside at3-460' Hotrbs-tane, my property is conttguous with Capita1 Matt. t object
to the proposed changes in zoning and other requests made by Capital Mall JC
LLC. My property is directly and negatively affected by the mall every day. The
traffic (bothvehicutarand wafktng), noise, trash, and Hghtingcreate
overwhelming problems for me on a daily basis.
First of all, raising the height of light fixtures bordering my property can only
increase the brightness of the light pouring into my house at night. Currently., the
light emitted at night from the mall area makes my backyard and the back of my
house as light as day. I understand Capital Mall representatives allege they will be
able to direct the light differently with new higher light posts. But they could also
leave the light poles at the current, approved height and add the new directed
lighting. If this is accomplished it might be beneficial to my property and might
prove the alleged benefits of the directed lighting. If the new height of light poles
is approved, I will never have an option of going back to the shorter poles and the
damage is permanent.
Anot~r proposal Js removal of the £urrent island .on Country Club Drive~ The
current island does not slow down traffic but it does provide a sight barrier of
current businesses from Hobbs Lane. Replacing it with a traffic circle will not
provide a visual barrier. It will probably not slow traffic. To remove the current
island would be another change in the original agreements which attempted to
lessen the negative influences of the mall on the neighborhood. This should not
be done without full support of the neighborhood.
If the Council and the Capital Mall genuinely want to slow traffic on Country Club
Drive to protect the residents of the area .. they would choose traffic lights and/or
speed bumps. These would be the most effective way to slow the traffic on this
street.
i presume there are oTdrnances a bout pub-He nursance-sand t betteve the· trash
that is created by their customers and is scattered to the buffer zone and beyond
is a public nuisance. It should be required to be removed, just as property owners
are required to cut weeds. Perhaps a noise barrier-high fence on the west side of
the buffer zone could alleviate some of the noise, trespassing, and trash
problems.
Granting the charrge fn zonirTg and other requests of Capital Malt is clearly
intended to increase current business for the mall and also bring in new
businesses. However, it will increase the detrimental effects of the mall on the
surrounding neighborhood. Please consider not only the profit for the mall and
the sales tax revenue for the city, but also protecting the citizens of the
community.
lftne City Council and Capitat Matt reaHy are stncere rn wanting to work wtth and
protect the neighboring properties, they will keep in mind these comments and
suggestions, and not blindly approve the requests of Capital Mall. Thank you for
your consideration.
Martha Ann Claiborne
Stratman, Anne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr. and Mrs. Haight,
Barron, Eric
Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:33 AM
'newbyhaight@embarqmail.com'
Stratman, Anne
RE : Mall re -z oning
Thank you for yo ur comme nts. They will be distributed to the Planning and Zoning Commi ss ion member s at their
meeting on Thursday night (January 151h).
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Senior Planner
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Becky Haight [mailto:newbyhaight@embarqmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 8:16 PM
To: Stratman, Anne
Subject: Mall re-zoning
To Zoning Conunission Members and Others Whom It May Concern:
This letter is in regards to Case No. P 15001 , the applications for rezoning, special exception permit and
preliminary plat. As local homeowners in the neighborhood adjacent to the mall property, we have grave
concerns for particular aspects of these applicat ions and plans, specifically 1) the removal of the roadway island
on Country Club that delineates between th e commercial and residential zones, 2) the lifting of height
restrictions on parking lot light posts & the additional lighting imposed by electronic signs, 3) the removal of
trees in the bu ffer zone between the mall and the homes, and4) the lifting of restrictions allowed by C2 general
commercial that would tum Country Club Dr. adjacent to a residentia l area into a sh·ip similar to Missomi
Boulevard.
The roadway island was an agreement between the previous mall owners and the neighborhood association that
was sanctioned by the city council at the time. Its intended purpose is not only to slow traffic clown tlu·ough the
residential area but to clearly define the area as residential and separate from the mall area. Replacing it with a
flat roundabout with no center vertical landscaping completely does away with that delineation and leaves the
residential area open to further encroachment by commercial areas, I ights, noise, and traffic to and from the
mall.
Restricting the lighting on the east side of the mall property was a huge issue in 1977 and it is no different
today . By their own admission the mall developers say that lighting teclmology ha s improved greatly and is able
to be directed much better and to offer better coverage of the parking lot ; if h·ue, then raising the height of the
poles would not be necessary. It will, however, have a tremendous impact on the neighboring houses with no
way to significantly block that light from impeding the private property . Additionally , the massive 50' highway
sign proposed is wel l beyond the limits set by zoning, and will have an electronic billboard. This will allow
even more lighting to bleed over into the residential area, and we are asking the commission to keep that sign to
a reasonable height and as far away from the homes as possible.
1
The trees in the buffer zone between the mall and the homes were part of an agreement endorsed by the city
council. Those trees have deteriorated over the years that General Growth Properties owned the mall, and in the
2+ years the new developers have had ownership they've continued to deteriorate and thin out allowing for
clear views from the commercial areas into the residential areas. Now the developer is propo~ing to remove
more of those trees and lessen the vertical barrier between the zones even f urther. While the developers have
plans for landscaping, it is low to the ground and will provide no significant buffer between the mall and the
residential area.
Finally, there is a need to recognize that, although the mall is a huge shopping building and the zoning codes
have changed since it was built, the neighborhood was here first. Designating lots directly on Country Club Dr
as a neighborhood shopping area is not an umeasonable request. Those lots could remain C I neighborhood
conm1ercial in recognition that this area is adjacent to and leads to a residential district.
As the city has grown and continues to grow, that growth needs to be m anaged so that not only are we
encouraging retail and business growth, but so that established residential areas are protected. The buffer zone
with appropriate vertical shielding should not be done away with or reduced. As the mall area seeks to grows,
the impetus is on the city to provide protection for the residential area that keeps pace, i.e., the busier the
commercial area is projected to get, the bigger the buffer between the two zones needs to be. Please put
yourselves in our shoes: if this was happening next door to your home, what would you want your city leaders
to do for you?
Sincerely,
Randy and Becky Haight
3463 Hobbs Lane 566-0458
newbyhaight@embargmail.com
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://\\'W\v.symantecclouc\.com
2
January 11, 2015
Chairman Robinett and commissioners,
I am writing to you as a property owner who will be effected by the decision on the change in zoning of
the Capital Mall propert y.
Since 1977 the former developers of the mall understood that the neighbors who live in the adjoining
neighborhoods were vital to its success and that being a good steward with those neighbors was
important.
With this recent request to change the zoning, it appears that the new owners, while touting their local
community ties, actually are less concerned with the neighbors and the problems the zoning changes
may bring and more concerned with their own success and profitability.
Are meeting the needs of the mall while maintaining standards for the neighbors mutually exclusive? I
don't feel that they need to be .
As a neighbor, I want to know that my concerns are listened too and addressed through some
compromise to the plans that have been vaguely explained and explored to date. For example, too many
times in the current proposal is the reference "to be determined" or "may change". With references
such as this, how can the other landowners be confident in the proposal?
I would propose having the developers, city planning, neighbors and members of your committee form a
working group to have discussions before this issue moves forward.
Please understand that members of our community are watching to see how neighborhoods vs . retail
are being treated. If the side of retail is chosen, who will support the retail?
I respectfully urge you to vote no, or table this discussion until more information can be shared about
the long-term impact of this decision for both t h e neighbors and the deve loper.
Respectfully,
~J~CPO
RE EIVED
Doug and Pat Thomas
3444 Hobbs Lane JAN 1 4 20 15
Jefferson City, MO 65109
573-644-5477
Stratman, Anne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr and Mrs Thomas:
McMillan, Janice
Monday, January 12, 2015 12:37 PM
'pat@ patthomas.us'
Stratman, Anne
RE: Web site message from:Patricia From Planning and Protective Services
comment/complaint form
Thank you for your comments. Your comments will be forwarded to Chairman Robinett and the Planning and Zoning
Commission .
Janice McMillan, AICP
Director, Department of Planning & Protective Services City of Jefferson, Missouri 65101
320 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Email jmcmillan@jeffcityrno.org
Direct 573.634.6424
Main 573 .634 .6410
-----Original Message-----
From: pat@patthornas.us [rnailto :pat@patthornas.us]
Sent : Monday, January 12, 2015 12:33 PM
To: Stegeman, Ellen
Cc: Grellner, David
Subject : Web site message from:Patricia From Planning and Protective Services comment/complaint form
January 11, 2015
Chairman Robinett and commissioners,
I am writing to you as a property owner who will be effected by the decision on the change in zoning of the Capital Mall
property.
Since 1977 the former developers of the mall understood that the neighbors who live in the adjoining neighborhoods
were vital to its success and that being a good steward with those neighbors was important.
With this recent request to change the zoning, it appears that the new owners, while touting their local community ties,
actually are less concerned w ith the neighbors and the problems the zoning changes may bring and more concerned
with their own success and profitability.
Are meeting the needs of the mall while maintaining standa rd s for the neighbors mutually exclusive? I don't feel that
they need to be.
As a neighbor, I want to know that my concerns are listened too and addressed through some compromise to the plans
that have been vaguely explained and explored to date. For example, too many times in the current proposal is the
reference "to be determined" or "may change". With references such as this, how can the other landowners be
confident in the proposal?
I would propose having the developers, city planning, neighbors and members of your committee form a working group
to have discussions before this issue moves forward .
Please understand that members of our community ar e watching to see how neighborhoods vs. retail are being treated.
If the side of retail is chosen, who will support the retail?
1
I respectfully urge you to vote no , or table this discu ssion until more information can be shared about the long-term
impact of this decision for both the neighbors and the developer.
Respec t fully,
Doug and Pat Thomas
3444 Hobbs Lane
Jefferson Cit y, MO
65109
5 73-644-54 77
Patricia Thomas
3444 Hobbs Lane
Jefferson City
MO
65109
5734736454
pat@patthomas.us
2
Stratman, Anne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Barron, Eric
Monday, January 12, 2015 9:25 AM
'carneyfam@centurylink.net'
Stratman, Anne
RE: Opposition to Proposed Rezoning of Capital Mall
Thank you for your comments. They will be printed and distributed to the Planning and Zoning Commission members at
their meeting on Thursday, January 15, at 5:15 p.m.
Sincerely,
Er ic Barron
Senior Planner
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Bart and Mandee Carney [mailto:carneyfam@centurylink.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 9:01 PM
To: Stratman, Anne
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Rezoning of Capital Mall
Dear Planning and Zoning Conm1ission,
We are writing to you because for many reasons we oppose the rezoning of the Capital Mall (3600 Block of
Countty Club and 3700 Block of West Truman Boulevard). In 1977 many promises were made to the
neighborhoods to the east of the Capital Mall, and by rezoning the area and approving the special permits, we
believe those promises are being broken . It is important for the neighborhoods and for the environment to
maintain the wooded buffer zone between the Capital Mall complex and the neighborhoods. Also, many
families will be negatively impacted by increasing the height and size of the lighting and signage around the
complex. Furthermore, by removing the island on Country Club Drive and replacing it with a roundabout,
traffic through the local neighborhoods will increase, thus decreasing the safety of the local residents.
We feel it is very important for the City of Jefferson to keep the promises that it makes to its citizens. Will you
keep your word? While we agree that the Capital Mall complex is in need of updates, we do not feel that these
updates should be done at the expense of the local neighborhoods. In closing, the owners of the Capital Mall
should not be allowed to positively impact their investment while they negatively impact my investment. We
ask that you do not approve the rezoning of the Capital Mall complex.
Sincerely,
1
Bart and Mandee Carney
3440 Hobbs Lane
Jefferson City, MO 65109
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
2