HomeMy Public PortalAbout2003-2004 Audit Management LetterCITY OF MOAB, UTAH
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS,
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
ON LEGAL COMPLIANCE AND
MANAGEMENT LETTER
JUNE 30, 2004
CITY OF MOAB, UTAH
TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUNE 30, 2004
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS REPORT
Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance and on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Based on an
Audit of General -Purpose Financial Statements Performed
in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards
STATE COMPLIANCE REPORT
Independent Auditors' Report on Legal Compliance with
Applicable Utah State Laws and Regulations
CURRENT YEAR FINDINGS
STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS
Pages
1-2
3-4
5-6
7-8
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS REPORT
o
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE AND ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING BASED ON AN
AUDIT OF BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
August 19, 2004
Honorable Mayor and
City Council Members
City of Moab, Utah
We have audited the accompanying basic financial statements of the City of Moab, Utah (herein
referred to as the "City"), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004, and have issued our report
thereon dated August 19, 2004. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial
audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States.
Compliance
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's basic financial statements are
free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of
laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and
material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an
opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly,
we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of
noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
However, we noted certain immaterial instances of noncompliance that we have reported to the
management of the City in the management letter.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City's internal control over financial
reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion
on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial
reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not
necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be
1
material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one
or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that
misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the basic financial statements
being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal
course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal
control over financial reporting and its operations that we consider to be material weaknesses.
However, we noted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we
have reported to management in the management letter.
This report is intended for the information of the Mayor and City Council, management, and
various federal and state funding and auditing agencies and is and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.
Larson & Peterson
Certified Public Accountants
2
STATE COMPLIANCE REPORT
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON LEGAL COMPLIANCE WITH
APPLICABLE UTAH STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
August 19, 2004
Honorable Mayor and
City Council Members
City of Moab, Utah
We have audited the basic financial statements of the City of Moab, Utah, as of and for the year
ended June 30, 2004, and have issued our report thereon dated August 19, 2004. As part of our
audit, we have audited the City of Moab's compliance with the requirements governing types of
services allowed or unallowed; eligibility; matching, level of effort, or earmarking; reporting;
special tests and provisions applicable to each of its major State assistance programs as required
by the State of Utah Legal Compliance Audit Guide for the year ended June 30, 2004. The City
received the following major State assistance programs from the State of Utah:
B and C Road Funds (Department of Transportation)
Liquor Law Enforcement (State Tax Commission)
Our audit also included test work on the City's compliance with those general compliance
requirements identified in the State of Utah Legal Compliance Audit Guide, including:
Public Debt
Cash Management
Purchasing Requirements
Budgetary Compliance
Other General Compliance Requirements
Uniform Building Code Standards
Impact Fees and Other Development Fees
The management of the City of Moab is responsible for the City's compliance with all
compliance requirements identified above. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
compliance with those requirements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Government
3
Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material
noncompliance with the requirements referred to above occurred. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance with those requirements. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The results of our audit procedures disclosed immaterial instances of noncompliance with the
requirements referred to above, which are described in the management letter. We considered
these instances of noncompliance in forming our opinion on compliance, which is expressed in
the following paragraph.
In our opinion, the City of Moab, Utah, complied, in all material respects, with the general
compliance requirements identified above and the requirements governing types of services
allowed or unallowed; eligibility; matching, level of effort, or earmarking; reporting; and special
tests and provisions that are applicable to each of its major State assistance programs for the year
ended June 30, 2004.
Larson & Peterson
Certified Public Accountants
4
MANAGEMENT LETTER
CITY OF MOAB, UTAH
CURRENT YEAR FINDINGS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
INTERNAL AND ACCOUNTING CONTROL FINDINGS
FINDING — DONATIONS TO THE CITY
It was noted during our audit that a donation check was cashed by the department to which
the donation was made and the cash reportedly used for department purposes. Documentation
for the expenditures was unavailable for review in order to determine their propriety. Further,
council is required to approve all City expenditures, and in the situation described above this
approval could not have taken place.
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend that proper accounting procedures be followed by all departments. That is
that all City revenue, including donations, be given to the City Treasurer and processed like
other cash receipts and recorded as revenue to the City. The funds can be used at that point for
department purposes using the normal procedures for expenditures. Budget adjustments can
then be made if they become necessary.
CITY RESPONSE:
The City will ensure that all departments understand and follow the proper accounting
policies and procedures.
STATE LEGAL COMPLIANCE FINDINGS
FINDING — IMPACT FEE ACCOUNTING
State laws require that impact fee money be reported separately and be allocated interest. The
City is using a spreadsheet to track impact fees but no interest is being allocated.
RECOMMENDATION:
We suggest that impact fees be recorded in separate funds for both the water and sewer fees to
make it easier to account for those fees as required.
CITY RESPONSE:
The City has separated the impact fees from the Water and Sewer fund for record
keeping purposes. Interest will be allocated as required for future fiscal years.
5
CITY OF MOAB, UTAH
CURRENT YEAR FINDINGS (CONCLUDED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
FINDING — BUDGETARY COMPLIANCE
State law requires departmental expenditures be kept within budgeted amounts. The
following fund was found to be over budget as of June 30, 2004, by the following amounts:
Fund/Department Amount
General Funds:
Police Department $ 32,957
Special Revenue Funds:
Moab Arts & Recreation Center 1,007
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend that expenditures be kept under budget, and if necessary, adjustments be
made to the budget after proper public hearings have been held.
CITY RESPONSE:
The City will monitor expenditures more closely and amend budgets as necessary.
6
CITY OF MOAB, UTAH
STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
INTERNAL AND ACCOUNTING CONTROL FINDINGS
FINDING — CITY OWNED CELL PHONES
We noted during our audit that the policy of the City for employees who carry City owned
cell phones to report the purpose of calls when call time becomes excessive is not always
being followed. This creates an environment in which personal use of City owned cell
phones could be paid for with taxpayer funds. We recommend that the City enforce the policy
of reporting on excessive minutes to ensure that taxpayer funds are used only for purposes
congruent with the duties of a municipality.
STATUS:
No problems noted in current year audit.
FINDING — TRAVEL EXPENSE POLICY
The existing travel expense policy makes it difficult for the accounts payable department to
gather all necessary receipts and supporting documents from employees when they are
reimbursed for travel expenses or when they use the city credit card. We recommend that the
City modify its policy to ensure that documentation can be available for council approval in a
timely manner. The City could require that receipts be obtained prior to the reimbursement
be made and that charges made on a city credit card that cannot be documented with a receipt
be charged to the employee.
STATUS:
No significant problems noted in current year.
FINDING — SEPARATION OF DUTIES
Because the same people who handle cash receipts also perform various bookkeeping
functions and utility billings, there is no system of "independent checking" as would exist in a
city with more accounting personnel. For example, it is usually best to assign the
responsibility for receipting utility payments to someone other than the person in charge of
utility billing.
STATUS:
No change.
7
CITY OF MOAB, UTAH
STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS (CONCLUDED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
STATE LEGAL COMPLIANCE FINDINGS
FINDING — IMPACT FEE ACCOUNTING
State laws require that impact fee money be allocated interest, and be reported separately.
The City is tracking impact fees within the Water and Sewer Fund. We suggest that impact
fees be recorded in separate funds for both the water and sewer fees to make it easier to
account for those fees as required.
STATUS:
No change.
FINDING — GENERAL FUND BALANCE LIMITATION
State law requires that the fund balance in the general fund should not exceed 18% of
budgeted revenue. At the end of the year the fund balance in the general fund exceeded the
18% maximum by approximately $318,000. We suggest steps be taken to reduce the fund
balance in the general fund below the allowed maximum.
STATUS:
No problems noted in current year audit.
BOND COMPLIANCE FINDINGS
FINDING — WATER & SEWER BONDS
The water bonds require reporting of water operations separate from sewer operations. The
proposed sewer bonding is likely to require the same reporting for the sewer fund.
STATUS:
No change. Water and sewer operations are segregated within the same fund.
8