HomeMy Public PortalAbout3139-1976- AMENDING ORDINANCE 2325-1968 KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCEAMENDED ORDINANCE NO, 3139-1976
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2325-1968 COMMONLY KNO14N AS THE
ZONING ORDNANCE OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, INDIANA,/ ADOPTED JUNE 3,
1968.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City of Richmond, Indiana,
as follows:
SECTION 1. WHEREAS, the Zoning Map which is part of Ordinance No.
2325-1968, designates and describes as R-2 Single Family Residential
District, the following described property located at 606 N.W. L
Street in the City of Richmond, Indiana! more particularly described
as follows:
Lot #3 Mapleton Addition, and more particulary known as:
Part of the Southeast Quarter of Section Thirty (30), Town-
ship Fourteen (14) North, Range One (1) West: Beginning at
a point in the center of the road at the intersection of
School and Northwest Fifth Streets, being the west continua-
tion of said School Street, in the City of Richmond, Indiana,
eight hundred ninety-three and five tenths feet (893.5) West
of the southeast corner of said Quarter Section; running thence
North twenty-three (23) rods to an iron pin; thence East,
parallel with the south Tine, of said Southeast Quarter,
Eighty-two and five tenths (82.5) feet to an iron pin; thence
South twenty-three (23) rods to the south line of said South-
east Quarter to the center of the road; thence !lest eighty-
two and five tenths (82.5) feet to the place of beginning,
containing seventy-two hundredths (0.72) of an acre, more
or less, being also known as Tract Number Three (3) of the
Plat of ground in Ratliff''s Mapleton Addition.
SECTION 2. WHEREAS, it is the intent and purpose hereof to change the
zoning classification on the above described area from R-2 Single Family
Residence District to M-2 General Industrial District, and,
SECTON 3. WHEREAS, a study of this Ordinance was conducted by the
Richmond City Plan Commission the 23rd day of November, 1976, at
which time remonstrances were heard from all parties interested in
or affected by this Ordinance.
SECTION 4. WHEREAS, the vote of the Richmond City Plan Commission was
eight (8) to zero (0), in favor of the recommending the passage of
Amended Ordinance No. 3139-1976,
NOW THEREFORE:
SECTION 5. It is hereby ordained that the zoning claassification of the
above described property be, and the same is hereby changed to M-2 Gen-
eral Industrial District, and that said property be regulated in accord-
ance with the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Richmond, Indiana, and all
amendments thereto.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage and approval as by law required.
SECTION 7. The original zoning classification of the aforementioned area
is hereby rescinded and the zoning classification of this area will be in
accordance with Section 2 of this Ordinance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Com n Coun it of the City of Richmond, Indiana,
this / -b4 day of 1976.
President of Common Council
Amended Ordinance No. 3139-1976
Page 2
ATTEST:
— 0 f",
Clerk
PRESENTED by me to the Mayo of the City of Richmond, Indiana, this
6 -tt day of , 1976.
Citya-r-k
APPROVED by me, Clifford J. Dickman, yor of the City of Richmond, Indiana,
this 6,/ '!�x day of , 1976.
ayor
ATTEST:
—
City Clerk
(A W &D
m
CD Q
PS
I
Aff
I .1h 1-
a
CL
0
CL CD
(D 0
PQ
IS"
J,3
m
rn
CI
--F-4
sa
RICHMOND, INDIANA
December 2, 1976
Mr, Kenneth Mills, President
Members of Common council &
Mrs. Jo Ellen Triznble, City Clerk
Wnicipal Building
Richwnd, Indiana 47374
Re: (Ordinance No. 3139-1976 - Plan C mdssion Case 76.16,
a request to change zoning an N.W, L Street from 1t�2
to M-2
Dear Mr. Mills, Members of the Council & Mrs, Trimble,
The Richmond City Plan Commission held a public hearing an Tuesday, Novem-
ber 23, 1976, to bear the request of members of the Planning; Department
represented by Robert B, Goodwin, Director, to rezone a portion of N.W, L
Street between N.W. 5th and N.W. 11th from R,2 (single family residential)
to M-2 (heavy industrial).
All parties interested in or affected by this request were given an oppor-
tunity to speak. Thirty-two (32) letters were mailed to adjoining property
owners and one (1) returned in favor of the petition and fourteen (14) re-
turned in opposition to this petition.
There were a large number of home owners that appeared at this meeting to
oppose the rezoning of the entire tract of land. After due consideration
of their arguments, the Planning Commission voted 8 - 0 to amend the peti-
tion to include only the site legally described as Lot #3 Mapleton Addition
being 82,5 feet in width along the north side of N.W, L and extending north.
from N.W. L 379.5 feet; more particularly described as follows;
Part of the Southeast Quarter of Section Thirty (30),
Township Fourteen (14) North, Range One (1) West: Be-
ginning at a point in the center of the road at the
intersection of School and Northwest Fifth Streets,
being the west continuation of said School Street, in
the City of Richmond, Indiana, eight hundred ninety-three
and five tenths feet (893.5) West of the southeast corner
of said Quarter Section; running thence North trenty-three (23)
rods to an iron pin; thence East, parallel with the south
line, of said Southeast Quarter, eighty-two and five tenths
(82.5) feet to an iron pin; thence South twenty-three (23)
rods to the south line of said Southeast Quarter to the
center of the road; thence West eighty-two and five tenths
(82.5) feet to the place of beginning, containing seventy-
two hundredths (0,72) of an acre, more or less, being also
known as Tract Number Three (3) of the plat of ground in '
Ratliff's Mapleton Addition,
SUMMARY REPORT
COMMITTEE FOR EVALUATION OF DATA PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS
.CITY OF RICHMOND
INTERMEDIATE RECOMMENDATION
COMMITTEE
Co -Chairperson R.
Ahaus
City Council
Ca -Chairperson G.
Merchanthouse
City Council
R.
Edens
Richmond Water Works
D.
Herbst
Dunham Lear Inc.
R.
Robbins
Reid Memorial Hospital
D.
Runyon
First National Bank
T.
Webb
Beldon Corporation
Page z
The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the
recommendations by the committee. A more detailed report will
be provided to the council which -will state tite basis on which
the recommendations have been made.
The preliminary report which this committee provided
the council; provided the following information:
A. The background of the method presently used by the
City Controller and the reason for the original ordinance
request.
B. A systems proposal from NCR.
C. An executive summary of the NCR 8200 system.
D. The NCR 8200 features.
E. Several letters addressed either to the computer
Task Force or to the common council from Mr. Meredith.
F. Other letters pertaining to the original ordinance from
Mr. Meredith.
G. Several attachments concerning visits or investigations
made by the committee.
H. The preTiminary recommendations of the committee.
The preliminary recommendations of the committee were as
follows:
A. That.all governing bodies within Wayne County should
investigate fully the probability of a centralized
Data Center.
B. The present payroll system should be transferred to a
local service bureau or financial institution to allow
more time to be spent on the Controller's direct
problem of an accounting system.
Page 3
C. An investigation of using the Richmond Power and Light
Computer to relieve the workload on the accounting machine.
D. The programmer analyst should be freed up from any
operational duties to devote his time to the investi-
gation and solution to the Controller's accounting problems.
The above recommendations were based on a good deal of
study. Investigation has been continuing since this report was
submitted. The following has occurred since this report was prepared:
A. A meeting with the Wayne County councilmen to discuss
the probability of a central data center.
B. A discussion with the Chamber of Commerce to investigate
how the Chamber could be helpful to this committee.
C. Discussions with other possible departments who may in
the future require Data Processing capabilities.
D. The decision by the Auditor's office to replace the
present NCR 399 systems with one NCR 8200 system.
All of these points have shown the committee that we can
no longer wait for a solution to Mr. Meredith's problem but
must nov., make an -intermediate recommendation to solve this
problem. Therefore. the committee makes the following recommendations:
I. The present ordinance which was for the purchase
of a mini -computer, should be amended to read that a mini-
computer should be leased on a five-year basis. It is inter-
esting to note that the contract which would be entered into
with NCR for an 82"0, is so worded that if at any time, the
City Council would not approve the funds for the rental
of this computer the following year, the contract is automati-
cally terminated at the end of the year. Therefore; the
council has complete control over the continuance of the
mini -computer from year -to --year. In light of the decision of
the Wayne County Auditor's office to install an NCR 8200 system,
we believe the only solution to the City of Richmond, is to
install a similar system. The benefits to be gained from
this installation are as follows:
A. Complete systems back-up for the Auditor's office and
for the Controller's office in case one system is down.
B. A sharing of programming and systems skills would
be possible, which would help both departments in the
continuance of their systems at a lower cost.
C. The capability of sharing data between the depart-
ments as required.
D. The capability in the future, as required, to connect
the two NCR 8200's together by communications lines for
direct transfer of data.
E. The capabilityof these NCR 8200's to serve as term-
inals in the future to a central processor. This
would insure complete upward compatibility as required.
II. The second recommendation from the committee is that
a proper salary schedule must be maintained to. insure that
the systems and programming will be protected for the future.
The present salary of the programmer analyst is paid through -
CETA �Ltnds. The amount of the salary presently does not
represent an average salary for similar programmer analysts
within Wayne County. Therefore; the committee recommends that
Page 5
an additional $2500 be appropriated to raise the salary to a
proper level.
III. As a further step in insuring that the communications
between all governing agencies within Blayne County is continued
inthearea of Data Processing, the present committee would
like to be expanded to include members of the Auditors and
Wayne County Council, the Richmond Power and Light, and as
required in the future, other organizations which may be involved
in a central data center. It would be the purpose of this
committee to meet on a regular basis to provide assistance and
guidance to the respective Data Processing Departments, and to
insure that all tax payers within Wayne County receive the
most for their tax dollars in the area of Data Processing.
IV. The final recommendation of the committee, is
merely the statement that a full detail report concerning each
of the recommendations outlined in this report be submitted
to the council prior to their next meeting.
It is our firm belief that given the facts now known,
the best path for the City of Richmond to follow is to lease
an NCR 8200 system and to install the fund accounting applica-
tion. The attached schedule provides a financial breakdown,of
this recommendation.
Page 6
Schedule A
NCR
8200
Amount
Sub -total Total
1.
64K 8200 Processor
$ 710.00
2.
125LPM Line Printer
245.00
3.
(2) CRTS Input Terminals
150.00
4.
(2) Disk Units
520.00
$ 1665.00
5.
(1) Adapter
40.00
Software
1.
COBOL Compiler
$ 25.00
2.
Utilities
10.00
3.
IFMS Applications
45.00
$ 80.00 $ 1,745.00
Fixed Costs
1.
Freight $
175.00
2.
System Installation
700.00
3.
Changes to computer room
1000.00
4.
Input cassettes
100.00
5.
Disk packs (10)
1000.00
6.
Cable for CRT's
400.00
7.
Trdining
600.00
8.
New forms and stock paper
1000.00
$ 5,000.00
First
year costs would be as follows:
1.
Fixed costs
$ 5,;000.00
2.
Monthly rental for 8 months
13,960.00
3.
Programmer Salary Increase
2,500.00
Total
first year costs
$21,460.00