Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutExhibit MSD 11A27 Effective Utility Management Self Assessment March 2011Exhibit MSD 11A27 DRAFT Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Effective Utility Management Self -Assessment Final Report March 2011 IEF FE ON • WELLS I-1. .:,.. RFC RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC. RFC RAFTEUS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC. March 18, 2011 1031 S. Caldwell Street • Suite 100 Phone 704 • 373 • 1199 5 www.raftelis.com Charlotte • North Carolina • 28203 Fax 704 • 373 • 1113 Mr. Jeffery Theerman Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District 2350 Market Street St. Louis, MO 63103 Dear Mr. Theerman: We have completed the Effective Utility Management ("EUM") Assessment for the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District ("MSD"), which was the initial Phase of the MSD management audit. The attached report presents the findings and suggestions resulting from the collaborative work of MSD and the consultants. We appreciate the participation and effort of the MSD team throughout the EUM process. We are confident that you will find the contents of this report useful as you work to position MSD closer to the ideal EUM state. If you have any questions concerning this report or any aspect of the EUM self - assessment phase of this engagement, please contact me at (336) 209-1347 or at dthomas@raftelis.com. Very truly yours, Darin Thomas Director of management Consulting Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Effective Utility Management Assessment Final Report Table of Contents Subject Page Introduction 2 Assessment Objective 2 About Effective Utility Management 2 Approach 4 Overall Findings 5 MSD Attribute Assessment 6 Suggestions 8 Attributes 9-15 Keys to Management Success 15-17 Appendices A Sense of the Stakeholder Interviews and Online Survey B Employee Focus Group Notes C Manager/Supervisor Focus Group Notes D Attribute Measures E Keys to Management Success Workshop Notes F Strategic Business and Operating Plan -Fiscal Years 2011 — 2015 - Summary Comments and Strategic Frameworks — EUM Format 1 Metropolitan St Louis Sewer District Effective Utility Management Assessment Report Introduction Jefferson Wells and the management consulting division of Raftelis Financial Consultants ("SUNESIS") were engaged to conduct a management audit in accordance with the Metropolitan St Louis Sewer District ("MSD") charter. The first phase of the project, which was primarily SUNESIS' responsibility, was to work with MSD management to conduct a self -assessment of MSD in relation to the Ten Attributes of Effectively Managed Utilities ("Attributes") and the Five Keys to Management Success ("Keys") as presented in Effective Utility Management, A Primer for Water and Wastewater Utilities prepared through an agreement of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and six national water and wastewater associations. The self -assessment compared MSD's operating practices with the ten Attributes and the five Keys identified in EUM. In general, MSD addresses all of the EUM Attributes and has implemented significant portions of each of the Keys. However, conforming more closely to EUM should enable MSD to improve its overall organizational performance and better prepare the organization for the coming challenges it faces in implementing a major capital program in conformance with a consent decree with the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and other regulatory and customer requirements. Assessment Objective MSD is an innovative utility with a simple vision, Quality Service Always. To provide consistent high quality service, MSD must use the best management approaches within the water and wastewater industry. With this in mind, the objective of the EUM assessment was to: Review MSD's status relating to the EUM standards and to develop an approach and plan that will enable MSD to move closer to an ideal EUM state. About Effective Utility Management EUM is a comprehensive approach to help utilities respond proactively to both current and future challenges. Developed by a consortium of six water and wastewater industry associations and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, EUM practices have been developed to support utilities as they seek to position themselves as successful 21St century service providers. The EUM process works to assure that a utility addresses the Ten Attributes of Effectively Managed Utilities, which are at the core of the EUM 2 process. As extracted from the Primer "Effective Utility Management", dated June 2008, these Attributes, which have been adjusted to meet the needs of a wastewater and stormwater agency, are: 1. Product Quality - Wastewater: "Produces treated effluent, and process residuals in full compliance with regulatory and reliability requirements and consistent with customer, public health, and ecological needs." 2. Product Quality - Stormwater: "Improves area water quality by preventing harmful pollutants from being carried by storm water runoff into local water bodies." 3. Employee and Leadership Development: "Recruits and retains a workforce that is competent, motivated, adaptive, and safe -working. Establishes a participatory, collaborative organization dedicated to continual learning and improvement. Ensures employee institutional knowledge is retained and improved upon over time. Provides a focus on and emphasizes opportunities for professional and leadership development and strives to create an integrated and well -coordinated senior leadership team." 4. Financial Viability: "Understands the full life -cycle cost of the utility and establishes and maintains an effective balance between long-term debt, asset values, operations and maintenance expenditures, and operating revenues. Establishes predictable rates —consistent with community expectations and acceptability —adequate to recover costs, provide for reserves, maintain support from bond rating agencies, and plan and invest for future needs." 5. Community Sustainability: "Is explicitly cognizant of and attentive to the impacts its decisions have on current and long-term future community and watershed health and welfare. Manages operations, infrastructure, and investments to protect, restore, and enhance the natural environment; efficiently uses water and energy resources; promotes economic vitality; and engenders overall community improvement. Explicitly considers a variety of pollution prevention, watershed, and source water protection approaches as part of an overall strategy to maintain and enhance ecological and community sustainability." 6. Stakeholder Understanding and Support: "Engenders understanding and support from oversight bodies, community and watershed interests, and regulatory bodies for service levels, rate structures, operating budgets, capital improvement programs, and risk management decisions. Actively involves stakeholders in the decisions that will affect them." 7. Customer Satisfaction: "Provides reliable, responsive, and affordable services in line with explicit, customer -accepted service levels. Receives timely customer feedback to maintain responsiveness to customer needs and emergencies." 8. Operational Optimization: "Ensures ongoing, timely, cost-effective, reliable, and sustainable performance improvements in all facets of its operations. Minimizes resource use, loss, and impacts from day-to-day operations. Maintains 3 awareness of information and operational technology developments to anticipate and support timely adoption of improvements." 9. Operational Resiliency: "Ensures utility leadership and staff work together to anticipate and avoid problems. Proactively identifies, assesses, establishes tolerance levels for, and effectively manages a full range of business risks (including legal, regulatory, financial, environmental, safety, security, and natural disaster -related) in a proactive way consistent with industry trends and system reliability goals." 10. Infrastructure Stability: "Understands the condition of and costs associated with critical infrastructure assets. Maintains and enhances the condition of all assets over the long-term at the lowest possible life -cycle cost and acceptable risk consistent with customer, community, and regulator -supported service levels, and consistent with anticipated growth and system reliability goals. Assures asset repair, rehabilitation, and replacement efforts are coordinated within the community to minimize disruptions and other negative consequences." 11. Resource Adequacy: "Ensures wastewater capacity consistent with current and future customer needs through long-term capacity analysis, conservation, and public education. Explicitly considers its role and manages operations to provide for long-term aquifer and surface water sustainability and replenishment." The management techniques that EUM considers the Five Keys to Management Success that effectively managed utilities use to address the Attributes, are also defined in "Effective Utility Management", and include: 1. Leadership: "Critical to effective utility management particularly in the context of driving and inspiring change within an organization." 2. Strategic Business Planning: "An important tool for achieving balance and cohesion across the Attributes." 3. Organizational Approaches: "Contribute to overall effective utility management that are critical to the success of management improvement efforts." 4. Measurement: "Critical to the management improvement efforts associated with the Attributes." 5. Continual Improvement Management Framework: "A plan, do, check, act framework." Approach SUNESIS managed and facilitated the EUM assessment that included the following tasks: ❑ Reviewing existing documents including measures, organizational charts, existing strategic and operating plan, customer survey results, and financial information. 4 Q' Developing an assessment plan. Q' Conducting an introductory workshop with MSD senior management to assure a clear understanding of the project, develop a calendar, assign attribute teams, and identify potential interviewees. Q' Interviewing key stakeholders including management, selected Board Members, and Rate Commission members. Q' Conducting and analyzing an on-line survey of MSD management personnel addressing the EUM Attributes and keys. Q' Helping Attribute champions and teams provide information and ideas concerning Attribute measures and core strategies. Q' Conducting ten focus group sessions with selected interdepartmental groups of approximately ten employees each (five sessions with manager and supervisor level groups and five with non -management employee groups) to discuss their perceptions of MSD's activities related to Attributes and Keys. Q' Conducting a two-day workshop with senior management directed toward the Attribute measures and activities. Q' Facilitating a workshop with senior leadership and the Attribute champions to address MSD's approach to the Five Keys to Management Success. Q' Reviewing a preliminary list of suggestions at a workshop with senior leadership and the Attribute champions to evaluate priorities of potential suggestions and to determine those that would require further planning before implementation. Q' Preparing this final report. Overall Findings Overall, SUNESIS believes MSD is operating in accordance with the majority of the components of EUM. Specifically, while operating a very successful utility that provides excellent wastewater services at rates that are relatively low compared to other communities, MSD has: Q' Identified measures directed towards each Attribute. Q' Implemented actions relating to the various Attributes. Q' Generally conformed with EUM in approaches to most of the Attributes. Q' Focused extensive efforts on customer satisfaction consistent with its vision of "Quality Service Always ". The results of these efforts are confirmed by consistently positive customer survey results. 5 Q' Devotes significant efforts and much of the strategic plan to stakeholder communications. This is likely to become increasingly important as MSD implements its capital improvement plan that will require substantial rate increases in the future. Q' Implemented portions of each of the Five Keys to Management Success to a significant degree. Some of the specific approaches to the keys could be improved. MSD Attribute Assessment As part of the online survey, which had 47 management level respondents, MSD's management team conducted a critical analysis of the relative importance of each Attribute to the organization and the organization's effectiveness for each Attribute. The purpose of this analysis was to develop a sense of priority in terms of potential improvement actions. The results of the critical analysis are presented below. E f f e c t t y e n e s s L 0 W e r H i g h e r 5 4 3 PQ SW IS 2 PQ WW FV CS SS 00 ED CSU OR 1 RA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Higher Impact Lower Impact Importance Ranking Key: PQWW=Product Quality Wastewater, PQWW=Product Quality Stormwater, CS=Customer Satisfaction, FV=Financial Viability, 00=Operational Optimization, ED=Employee/Leadership Development, IS=Infrastructure Stability, WR=Water Resource Adequacy, CSU=Community Sustainability, OR=Operational Resiliency, SS=Stakeholder Understanding and Support 6 As shown in the grid, respondents did not rate any Attribute at an effectiveness level worse than 3. The overall quality of MSD's effectiveness supported this ranking in general. Through the review of the relative ranking of each Attribute's effectiveness, areas were found in need of improvement. Specifically, the analysis suggested the following: ❑ Product Quality Stormwater and Infrastructure Stability are of significant concern because of their relatively performance evaluation as compared to the other Attributes. ❑ MSD's effectiveness in Financial Viability may have been evaluated too highly since the stormwater issue and the need for substantial future rate resulting from required infrastructure improvements (and potential resistance to these rate increases), will probably negatively impact performance relative to this Attribute. ❑ While the organization's effectiveness in each of the most important Attributes was evaluated highly, MSD should continue current efforts in Product Quality — Wastewater and Customer Satisfaction to assure that ongoing high performance is maintained. ❑ Stakeholder Understanding and Support, which was ranked as the sixth most important Attribute, is receiving substantial attention in management actions and the strategic and operating plan. This appears appropriate considering substantial expected future rate increases would be likely to lower a future evaluation of effectiveness and increase the Attribute's importance. ❑ While Resource Adequacy ranked as the lowest of the Attributes in importance, the Attribute team addressing this subject believes that it is actually critically important to the long-term sustainability of the Utility and should be addressed aggressively. In addition, it is clear from the self -assessment phase of this engagement that MSD management believes that it: ❑ Has the necessary human resources (people and skills) to achieve its mission, although lack of funding is beginning to impact this as a result of layoffs and open positions. ❑ Communicates internally and works well across departmental lines. ❑ Measures and monitors performance, although it does not directly tie measures to the strategic plan. ❑ Prepares and updates an effective strategic plan, capital improvement plan, and other key plans necessary for operating the Utility. ❑ Executes its strategies and activities with a sense of urgency. 7 Q' Operates an efficient Utility, however, with budget cuts and salary freezes, some targeted additional resource allocations may be desirable. Q' Is able to react to and respond to change. Q' Communicates with stakeholders, although management recognizes that this will become increasingly important in the coming years as MSD rates increase to pay for capital improvements. The above issues, and others, should be subjected to independent testing in Phase II of this management audit project. Suggestions Numerous suggestions relating to the Attributes and Keys to Management Success were discussed during the workshops. The agreed upon suggestions that the SUNESIS team and MSD management believe would move MSD closer to EUM standards with an indication of the action required (I = Implement Immediately or IP = Develop Implementation Plan  in many cases implementation planning is already in process) are presented on the following pages. These suggestions are categorized as: Q' High Priority: Critically important to MSD's success and must be implemented. Q' Moderate Priority: Important to MSD's success and should be implemented. Q' Others: Considered positive suggestions that should be considered for implementation as time and resources permit. It should be noted that many of the suggestions included in this section relate to regulatory requirements or have regulatory implications, which should be considered in final implementation decisions. 8 Attribute Suggestions Attributes Suggestions Product Quality High Priority 1. Implement additional efforts to reduce SSOs and CSOs, while maintaining focus on sewer cleaning and rehabilitation program. 2. Continue efforts to upgrade the Laboratory Information Management System and Operations Reporting Software. 3. Improve data management with the continued clean-up of data in Maximo. 4. Replace and rehabilitate aging infrastructure through implementation of the capital improvement plan. 5. Expand parts of the system to reduce need for bypasses. Moderate Priority 6. Continue GIS mapping improvements. 7. Monitor emerging regulatory requirements, especially those that will require changes to MSD plants. Action Required IP I IP IP IP IP (for assets not addressed) I Product Quality - Stormwater High Priority 8. Continue efforts to address stormwater funding 9. Monitor and address new and emerging regulations. 10. Maintain strategies regarding MS4 permit renewal. 11. Educate the public on stormwater issues and the impact of lack of funding. I I I (in process) 9 Attributes Cont' Suggestions Action Re ' uired Product Quality — Stormwater Cont'd) Moderate Priority 12. Proactively address watershed/303(d)/TMDL issues. 13. Expand program to incorporate green into stormwater customer solutions (if becomes part of consent decree will move to higher priority). 14. With sufficient funding, consider helping municipalities address customer floodplain issues. In process I In process (depends on lawsuit outcome) Customer Satisfaction High Priority 15. Provide enhanced information to customers impacted by sewer back-up on steps to take, responsibilities, MSD insurance program, etc. Moderate Priority 16. Review and consider changes to the MSD customer survey and assure appropriate sample size and include customers who are impacted by MSD construction, contractor construction, and engineering services as discrete parts of the customer survey process. 17. Continue to evaluate efforts of contractors with customer contact and assure that they display MSD's focus on customer satisfaction. IP I I 10 Attributes (Cont'd.) Suggestions Action Re ' uired Customer Satisfaction (Cont'd) Others 18. Create a single phone number for customers and a database for customer complaints and issues, while avoiding a complex telephone tree. 19. Enhance billing documentation and consistency in handling customer issues. I I Employee Leadership/Development High Priority 20. Improve usage and consistency of employee performance management system. 21. Develop a formal succession plan within public sector constraints and until completed, continue informal succession training. Review policy on notification for retirement and determine how recruiting can start before vacancy actually exists. Moderate Priority 22. Enhance management and leadership development training for managers and supervisors. 23. Document improved job expectations in updated job descriptions over a period time. Others 24. Conduct employee attitude survey, repeat communications survey, and follow-up on results. I IP (review and update informal plan) IP I I 11 Attributes (Cont'd.) Suggestions Operational Optimization High Priority 25. Train personnel on new systems with particular emphasis on smaller systems that are not being addressed currently. 26. Further develop the Oracle reporting function. 27. Assure that budget expenditure reports are timely and accurate so Operations personnel have an accurate view of their financial position. Moderate Priority 28. Continue efforts to focus on inventory shrinkage and improve inventory controls. 29. Enhance use of MSD purchasing power by combining purchases. Others 30. Determine if additional plant process standardization can result in efficiency enhancements. Action Required _ IP I (part of Oracle Plan) I (part of Oracle Plan) I IP (in process) I Financial Viability High Priority 31. Work with the Rate Commission to assure rates sufficient to fund capital program and meet operational needs. 32. Continue communications concerning District costs, financial needs, and rates with the public, the Rate Commission, municipalities in the service area, and the financial community to assure better understanding. 33. Aggressively pursue delinquent accounts. I (in process) I (in process) I (in process) 12 Attributes (Cont'd.) Suggestions Financial Viability (Cont'd) Moderate Priority 34. Continue and enhance efforts to better understand and manage MSD's full life -cycle cost. 35. Assure accurate integration of financial data with the asset management program. 36. Continue and enhance the internal audit program to assure it focuses on areas of strategic significance to the District and results in enhanced financial performance and integrity. Action Required IP IP IP Infrastructure Stability High Priority 37. Complete asset management program to include: ❑ Integrating asset management principles into system renewal. ❑ Establishing and supporting strategic cross functional asset management team. ❑ Enhancing and assuring consistency in the condition assessment process. ❑ Standardizing processes for system renewal. ❑ Developing long-term renewal plans for major pump stations and plants. ❑ Assuring that the District meets all CMOM requirements. ❑ Establishing formal tolerance level for high risk areas. 38. Continue system integration to identify data gaps of asset attributes, including integration with the financial system. 39. Implement current capital plan to meet regulatory and customer service needs. Moderate Priority 40. Enhance processes for inventory of new and rehabilitated assets. IP in process) IP IP IP 13 Attributes (Cont'd.) Action Suggestions Required Operational Resiliency High Priority 41. Identify opportunities to enhance employee safety. Moderate Priority 42. Review and exercise the emergency response plan. 43. Review opportunities to address single point of failure in the District's IT infrastructure. 44. Review appropriate inventory levels and consider establishing an emergency supply for critical parts. IP I (in process) I I Community Sustainability & Resource Adequacy High Priority 45. Implement a comprehensive watershed management plan that includes proactive watershed planning to address TMDLs for impaired streams, and Usage Attainability Analyses. 46. Create equitable and adequate stormwater funding (if MSD does not win lawsuit appeal). Moderate Priority 47. Articulate/document decision process for evaluating green infrastructure and natural resource protection and restoration in CIRP process. 48. Continue to incorporate sustainability into all aspects of MSD activities as it makes good business sense. 49. Communicate MSD community sustainability activities and steer the community towards more green sensitivity and activities. 50. Monitor and focus resources on meeting regulatory requirements. Others 51. Evaluate whether regional floodplain policy changes are necessary. IP IP IP 14 I Attributes (Cont'd. Suggestions Stakeholder Understanding and Support High Priority 52. Educate the public concerning the rate issue. Moderate Priority 53. Continue to implement stakeholder elements of the MSD strategic plan. 54. Identify opportunities to communicate to large groups of people using social media and other emerging technologies and traditional methods. Others 55. Work with employees to turn MSD people into spokespeople and advocates for the organization. 56. Utilize schools (curriculum, teachers, etc.) as a vehicle to address future key stakeholders. Action Required IP I I (in process) IP IP Keys Suggestions Keys to Management Success Suggestions Leadership High Priority Action Required, 57. Develop a formal succession plan within public sector constraints and IP (review until completed, continue informal succession training. Review policy and update on notification for retirement and determine how recruiting can start informal before vacancy actually exists (repeat from Employee and Leadership plan) Development Attribute # 21). 58. Continue and enhance efforts to assure positive communication throughout the organization to enhance employee understanding and commitment to MSD. I 15 Keys to Management Success (Cont'd.) Suggestions Action Re ' uired Leadership (Cont'd.) Moderate Priority 59. Maintain focus on MSD's mission and better communicate the values to all levels of the MSD organization. 60. Clearly communicate key Utility policies to employees and consider conformance with those policies as part of the performance management system. 61. Enhance management and leadership development training for managers and supervisors (repeat from Employee and Leadership Development Attribute # 22). I I I Strategic Business Planning High Priority 62. Clearly tie a few high level measures to the strategic plan. 63. Develop departmental strategic plans supportive of the MSD strategic plan in similar format. Implement a process whereby the departmental plans are quickly developed in a one -day facilitated session attended by key employees of the respective departments, followed by review, revision, and follow-up. Moderate Priority 64. Develop and implement a formal strategic plan implementation periodic review and monitoring program. I I I Organizational Approaches High Priority 65. Review span of control in some areas of Operations and reduce in areas where span is not reasonable, with consideration of cost and MSD organizational flattening efforts. I 16 Moderate Priority 66. Provide facilitator/effective meeting training to potential team facilitators and make use of these facilitators part of the MSD team culture. I Keys to Management Success (Cont'd) Suggestions Action Re s uired Measurement High Priority 67. Clearly tie a few high level measures to the strategic plan (Repeat from Strategic Business Planning #62). 68. Reinstitute the "high level scorecard" for MSD, creating an index of key performance measures for each Attribute. I I Continual Improvement Management Framework High Priority 69. Re -implement project reporting system that includes a project summary status report (underway, but should be better integrated into MSD systems). 70. Re-emphasize "sense of urgency" and importance of having projects done on -time and on -budget to MSD employees, consultants, and contractors, with emphasis on requirements of consent decree. Moderate Priority 71. Develop and train appropriate MSD personnel on a formal continuous improvement framework ("Plan, Do, Check, Act"). I I IP Appendices The appendices to this report represent interim deliverables and analyses resulting from the various Phase I tasks, which formed the basis for the suggestions contained herein. They are: A Sense of the Stakeholder Interviews and Online Survey B Employee Focus Group Notes C Manager/Supervisor Focus Group Notes D Attribute Measures E Keys to Management Success Workshop Notes 17 F Strategic Business and Operating Plan -Fiscal Years 2011 — 2015 - Summary Comments and Strategic Frameworks — EUM Format This report presents a summary of the results of the EUM Self -Assessment segment of the MSD management audit project. Questions or comments should be directed to Darin Thomas at 336-209-1347 or dthomas@raftelis.com. 18