HomeMy Public PortalAboutExhibit MSD 18Q Comparison of Delinquency Rates to Comparable Sewer DistrictsMetropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Comparison of Delinquency Rates to Comparable Sewer Districts
FY2007
State
Member Name
Bad Debt Expense
(2007)
% of Total
Revenue
IL
American Bottoms RWTF
40,509
3 .80%
NY
City of Monroe DES
1,198,000
2.30%
MO
Metro St . Louis Sewer Dist
$ 4,193,703
2.11%
KS
Johnson County WWD
503,561
0 .37%
AZ
Pima County
381,339
0 .28%
CO
Metro Water Recl . Dist .
1,298
0 .00 %
WA
King County DNR
1,469
0 .00%
Exhibit MSD 180
A NATIO NAL SURVEY OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT FINANCING AND TRENDS
Delinquent Account Write -Off
Survey respo ndents were requested to provide the to tal annual delinquent acc ount write-off (b ad debt
expense), as well as the percentage of total revenue that was considered as delinquent account write- off in
2007. The total a nnua l delinquent a ccount write-off for 63 agencies pr oviding retail ser vic e was $51.8
million , which equals 0.63 percent of total rev enues for these agen cies5 . T able B .27 provides summ ary
statistics for agency delinquent write-o ff fo r 2007.
TABLE B.27 BAD DEBT WRITE-OFF (2007)
Bad Debt Write -Off
2007 Bad Debt Expense Percent (%) of Total Revenue
- Agencies responding
80 63
-Total
$52,019,783 0 .63
- Maximum
$25,976,583 5.92
- Average
$650,247 0.65
- Median
$48,995 0 .38
- Minimum
$06 0 .00
Respondents were requested to indicate o ne or more acti ons that are taken against customers that do n ot
pay their bills within the time frame specified by their Utility . Acti ons included:
Shutting off water service ;
Shutting o ff sewer service;
Placing a lien on the property;
No tifying a collectio n agency ;
• No tifying a credit burea u, a nd;
• Write-o ff to ba d debts.
Table B. 28 provides the number and percent of a gencies using each of listed actions.
Other a dditiona l a ctio ns noted by respo ndents included: File suit, refer to city leg al collection staff, credit
a rra ngement, small cla ims co urt, T eeter Pla n, transfer to tax rolls, publish names, rev oke discharge permit for
septage haulers, and debt collection.
4 Agencies providing ex clusively wholesale service were not included in the analysis because these agencies do not bill household
customers directly.
5 This percent value was calculated by dividing the total bad debt write- off for all respondents in 2007 by the total reported
revenues for these 63 respondents from Question B. 2 of the survey. This bad debt percentage can be different
than the average of the individually reported bad debt percentages reported in Question B .7 .
6 T wenty-seven agencies providin g retail service reported an annual delinquent write-off of $0 in 200Z These agencies were counted
in calculating summary statistics including the average and median:
SECTION B Financials - 65
THE 2008 NACWA FINANCIALSURVEY
TABLE B. 28 COLLECTION ACTIONS USED (2007 ALL RESPONDENTS)
Collection Action
Number of Agencies Percent of Respondents (of 101)
- Cut Off Water
62
61%
- Cut Off Sewer
13
13%
- Place Lien
40 40%
- Collection Agency
37 37%
- Credit Bureau
14 14%
- Write Off
51 50%
- Other
17 17%
Figures B.21 illustrates the distributio n of bad debt write-off as a percent of t otal re venue for all resp ondents
providing reta il serv ice and all co llectio n actions. Similar to the 2005 Survey, three respondents to the 2008
Surv ey had delinqu ent account write-off abov e 2 percent of t otal rev enue.
FIGURE B.21 DISTRIBUTION OF BAD DEBT AS A PERCENT OF TOTAL REVENUE (ALL RESPONDENTS)
3.00
2.75
2.50 -
2.25
2. 00 -
1.75 -
1. 50 -
1.25 -
1.00 -
0. 75 -
0.50 -
0. 25 -
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90
Percent of Agencies Below Value
100
2007
2004
2001
1998
Note: Maximum values of 5.9 (2007), 4.6 (2004), 8.6 (2001), and 8.2 (1998) are not shown on the chart
66 - SECTION B Finan cials
Appendix B Delinquent Account Write -Off
THE NACWA 2008 FINANCIAL SURVEY
Bad Debt
Late Paym ent Consequences
ID
Member Name
Bad Debt
Expense
(2007)
% of
Total
Reve nue
Shut
Off
Water
Shut
Off
Sewer
Place
Lren
Notify
Coll .
Age ncy
Notify
Credit
B ureau
Write
Other
Off
AK0001
Anchorage WW Utility
75,074
0.21%
Yes
Yes
Yes
AL0003
Mobile Area WSS
191,756
0.47%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
AR0001
City of Litte Rock
263,600
0.74%
Yes
Yes
AR0002
City of Pine Bluff
49,989
1. 00%
Yes
Yes
Yes
AZ0001
City of Phoenix
762,000
0.50%
Yes
Yes
Yes
AZ0002
Pima County
381,339
0. 28%
Yes
Yes
CA0003
Union Sanitary District
0
0. 00%
Yes
Yes
Yes
small claims court
CA0005
C. Contra Costa SD
0
0.00%
CA0006
East Bay MUD
226,726
0.39%
Yes
Yes
Yes
CA0008
Sacramento County
0
0.00%
No bad debt
CA0009 City of San Diego
Yes
Yes
Yes
CA0014 Encina Wastewater Auth. 0
0. 00%
CA0022 Fairfield -Suisun SD
Yes Yes
CA0024 Delta Diablo SD 0
0.00%
Teeter Plan
CA0030 City of Fresno DPU
CA0036
City of Sunnyvale
29,047
0. 13%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
C00002
M etro Water Red. Dist.
1,298
0. 00%
Yes
Yes
C00004
City of Greeley
0
0.00%
Yes
Yes
Yes
DC0001
DC Water and Sewer Auth.
200,617
0.11%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
FL0002
Orange County Utilities
209,874
0.15%
Yes _
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
FL0012
Miami -Dade County WSD
3,365,000
0.79% Yes
Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
FL0013
City of St. Petersburg
232,999
0.24% Yes
Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
GA0002
Gwinnett County DPU
Yes
Yes Yes
Yes
GA0003
Columbus Water Works
197,545
0.38% Yes
Yes
GA0004
Macon Water Authority
400,035
0.91% Yes
_
Yes Yes
Yes _
Yes
GA0006 City of Augusta UD 355,884 1. 00% Yes
Yes Yes
HI0001 City& County of Honolulu 0. 01% Yes Yes
Yes
ID0001 City of Boise PWD 126,701 0.50% Yes
Yes Yes Publish names
IL0001 MWRD of Greater Chicago
IL0005 Downers Grove SD 244 0. 00% Yes Yes
Yes _
IL0007 American Bottoms RWTF 40,509 3.80% Yes Yes Yes file lawsuit
IL0011 Greater Peoria SD 5,000 0.50% Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes File Suit
IL0012 Bloomington & Normal W RD Yes
IL0013 Thorn Creek Basin SD 2,381 0.04% Yes Yes
IL0016 Fox Metro WRD
IL0017
Wheaton Sanitary District
Yes Yes Yes
IN0001
City of Indianapolis DPW 0
0. 00% Yes Yes
city legal collection staff
IN0002
Fort Wayne City Utilities 442,673
1.28% Yes Yes
Yes
Yes Yes
FILE SUIT
KS0001
Johnson County WWD 503,561
0.37% Yes
Yes
Yes Yes
KS0002
City of W ichita W SD 365,941_
1. 00% Yes Yes _
Yes
Yes Yes
KY0001
Louisville/Jefferson MSD 358,061
0. 76% Yes
Yes
KY0002
Sanitation District #1 384,000
1.22% Yes
Yes
MA0003
Upper Blackstorn WPAD 0
_
MA0004
South Essex SD
MD0001
Anne Arundel County DPW
Yes Yes
MD0003 W SSC 1,725,000 0.85% Yes
MI0002 Detroit WSD 4,068,472 1. 20% Yes
Yes Yes
MN0001 W estern Lake Superior SD 0
MN0002 MCES 0
Yes
MN0003 Rochester, Minn. WRP
_
M 00001
KC Water Services Dept.
1,402,679
3.00% Yes
Yes
Yes Yes Yes
Yes
M00004
Independence WPCD
90,298
0. 58% Yes
Yes
Yes
NC0002
Charlotte Mecklenburg Uti
958,000
1.00% Yes
Yes
Yes
NC0003
MSD of Buncombe County
45,736
0.18% Yes
Yes
NC0007
Orange WSA
143,268
0.56% Yes
Yes
Yes
NE0001
City of Omaha PWD
NJ0001
Ocean County UA
0
0.00%
NJ0013
Stony Brook Regional SA
0
0.00%
NV0002
Clark County San. Dist.
0
0.00%
Tax Roll
NV0004
City of Las Vegas
APPENDIX B Question 8.7 224
Appendix B Delinquent Account Write -Off
THE NACWA 2008 FINANCIAL SURVEY
ID
Bad Debt
Late Payment Consequences
Member Name
Bad Debt
Expense
(2007)
% of
Total
Revenue
Shut
Off
Water
Shut
Off
Sewer
Place
Lien
Notify
Coll.
Agency
Notify
Credit
Bureau
Write
Off
Other
NY0002
NYC Dept. of Env. Prot.
0
0.00%
Yes
Yes
Yes
NY0009
City of Monroe DES
1,198,000
2.30%
Yes
NY0011
Rockland County SD #1
0
0.00%
Relevied to tax bill
NY0020
Erie County DEP
Yes
OH0001
City of Akron PUB
Yes
Yes
OH0002
MSD of Greater Cincinnati
0
0.00%
Yes
Yes
Yes
OH0003
NE Ohio Reg. Sewer Dist.
1,333,203
0. 82%
Yes
Yes
Yes
OH0004
City of Columbus DSD
0
Yes
Yes
OH0008
City of Lima Util. Dept.
0
0. 00%
Yes
OH0010
City of Hamilton DPU
34,664
0.31%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Payment Arrangements
OH0013 City of Lebanon
Yes
Yes
Yes
OK0002 City of Tulsa PWD 756,163
0. 85%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
OR0001 Clean Water Services
OR0005 City of Gresham 91,754
0.00%
Yes
Yes
Yes
OR0009 City of Albany 32,339
0.10%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PA0002
Philadelphia Water Dept.
25,976,583
5. 92%
Yes
Yes Yes
PA0004
Delaware County RWQCA
278,510
0.80%
Yes
Yes
Yes
RI0001
Narragansett Bay Comm.
210,543
0.30%
Yes
Yes
Yes Collection calls and letters
SC0002
W estern Carolina RSA
357,474
0. 55%
Yes
Yes
Yes
SC0005
Mount Pleasant Waterworks
192,711
1.10%
Yes
SC0006
Beaufort Jasper WSA
Yes
Yes Yes
TN0003
City of Memphis, DPW
415,725
0. 80%
Yes
Yes
TN0004
MWS, Nashville & Davidson Cnty
2,560,470
1. 56%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
TX0001
Trinity Riv er Auth. Of TX
0
0.00%
TX0002
Austin Water Utility
437,024
0.28%
Yes
Yes
Yes
TX0005 El Paso Water Utilities, PSB 249,000
0.05%
Yes
TX0010 City of Garland 191,682
0. 56%
Yes
Yes
Yes
TX0016 Upper Trinity Reg. Water Dist.
Yes
UT0001 Salt Lake City Public Util. 6,121
0. 04%
Yes
Yes
Yes
UT0003 Central Davis Sewer District 0
0. 00%
Yes
UT0004
Snyderville Basin WRD
0
0.00%
Yes
VA0001
Alexandria Sanitation Auth.
48,000
0.19%
Yes
Yes
VA0003
Fairfax County WWMP
0
0.00%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
VA0006
Upper Occoquan SA
0
0.00%
VA0011
Chesterfield County Util.
43,041
0.16%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
WA0001
King County DNR
1,469
0.00%
Yes
Yes
WA0002
City of Tacoma PW D
W A0009
LOTT Wastewater Alliance
0
0. 00%
WI0001
Green Bay MSD
0
0.00%
WI0002
Madison MSD
0
0.00%
Revoke permits for septage
haulers
WI0003 Milwaukee M SD 0
0.00%
Agencies Responding
80
77
62
13
40
37
14
51
17
Minimum
0
0. 00%
Maximum
25,976,583
5.92%
Average
650,247
0. 53%
Median
48,995
0. 21%
Total
52,019,783
APPENDIX B Question B .7 225