HomeMy Public PortalAboutExhibit MSD 36A MSD Response to MIEC Fourth Discovery RequestExmI:1IT MSID 36A
BEFORE THE RATE COMMISSION OF THE
METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
JULY 22, 2011 FOURTH DISCOVERY REQUEST
OF THE MISSOURI INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Response
ISSUE: WASTEWATER RATE CHANGE PROPOSAL
WITNESS: METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWE " DISTRICT
SPONSORING PARTY: MISSOURI INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS
DATE PREPARED: JULY 28, 2011
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
2350 Market Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
1
EXHIBIT MSD 36A
BEFORE THE RATE COMMISSION
OF THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
For Consideration of a Wastewater
Rate Change Proposal by the Rate
Commission of the Metropolitan
St. Louis Sewer District
JULY 22, 2011 FOURTH DISCOVERY REQUEST
OF THE MISSOURI INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS
Pursuant to §§ 7.280 and 7.290 of the Charter Plan of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer
District (the "Charter Plan"), Operational Rule 3(2) and Procedural Schedule §§ 1, 14, 15 and 17
of the Rate Commission of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District ("Rate Commission"),
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District ("District") thereby responds to the Missouri Industrial
Energy Consumers July 22, 2011 Fourth Discovery Request for additional information and
answers regarding the Rate Change Proposal dated May 10, 2011 (the "Rate Change Proposal").
The District is requested to amend or supplement the responses to this Discovery
Request, if the District obtains information upon the basis of which (a) the District knows that a
response was incorrect when made, or (b) the District knows that the response, though correct
when made, is no longer correct.
The following Discovery Requests are deemed continuing so as to require the District to
serve timely supplemental answers if the District obtains further information pertinent thereto
between the time the answers are served and the time of the Prehearing Conference.
2
EXHIBIT MSD 36A
JULY 22, 2011 FOURTH DISCOVERY REQUEST
OF THE MISSOURI INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Response
4-1. Has Black & Veatch provided an electronic copy, with all formulas intact, of the
May 10, 2011 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District wastewater rate proposal to any MSD
personnel? If so, please identify who from MSD received an electronic copy of the rate
proposal, when it occurred, and identify the Black & Veatch personnel who provided the copy.
RESPONDER: Susan Myers, MSD General Counsel
RESPONSE: Pursuant to verbal clarification provided by MIEC's Attorney John Kindschuh
during a phone conversation on July 1, 2011, MIEC made it clear that "an electronic copy, with all
formulas intact, of the May 10, 2011 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Rate
Proposal" really meant the Black & Veatch Rate Model in its electronic format. MSD will assume
that MIEC's meaning is the same for this discovery request. Pursuant to that, the answer is no.
4-2. Has Black & Veatch provided access to any MSD personnel to view an electronic
copy, with all formulas intact, of the May 10, 2011 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
wastewater rate proposal? If so, please identify who from MSD was provided access to review
an electronic copy of the rate proposal, when it occurred, and identify the Black & Veatch
personnel who provided the access.
RESPONDER: Susan Myers, MSD General Counsel
RESPONSE: Pursuant to verbal clarification provided by MIEC's Attorney John Kindschuh
during a phone conversation on July 1, 2011, MIEC made it clear that "an electronic copy, with all
formulas intact, of the May 10, 2011 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Rate
Proposal" really meant the Black & Veatch Rate Model in its electronic format. MSD will assume
that MIEC's meaning is the same for this discovery request. Pursuant to that, the answer is no. Ms.
Jan Zimmerman did view the Black & Veatch Rate Model in its electronic format in 2004. Mr.
Keith Barber of Black & Veatch ran the model while Ms. Zimmerman observed.
4-3. Has Black & Veatch provided an electronic copy, with all formulas intact, of the
May 5, 2011 MSD wastewater utility cost of service study to any MSD personnel? If so, please
identify who from MSD received an electronic copy of the cost of service study, when it
occurred, and identify the Black & Veatch personnel who provided the copy.
RESPONDER: Jan Zimmerman, MSD Director of Finance
RESPONSE: Pursuant to verbal clarification provided by MIEC's Attorney John Kindschuh
during a phone conversation on July 1, 2011, MIEC made it clear that "an electronic copy, with all
formulas intact, of the May 10, 2011 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Rate
Proposal" really meant the Black & Veatch Rate Model in its electronic format. MSD will assume
that MIEC's meaning is the same for this discovery request. Pursuant to that the May 5, 2011
3
EXHIBIT MSD 36A
referenced document is the Detailed Calculations underlying the May 10, 2011 Wastewater Rate
Proposal. This document was provided as Exhibit MSD 4A as part of the District's submittal of the
May 10, 2011 Wastewater Rate Proposal. The May 5, 2011 date represents the date upon which
these detailed calculations were printed. The difference between the May 5th and May 10th dates
solely represents the lapse of time needed by MSD's rate consultant to finalize the text and format
of the Wastewater Rate Proposal document submitted on May 10, 2011
Also based on the District's interpretation of the request, the reference to a Cost of Service Study
represents the District's May 10, 2011 rate change submittal entitled Wastewater Rate Proposal. The
term Cost of Service Study is a generally accepted term in the rate design field for the service
provided to design utility rates.
The May 5, 2011 Cost of Service Study requested in 4-3 is the same as the May 10, 2011 MSD
Wastewater Rate Proposal, therefore, pursuant to that, no Black & Veatch electronic copy, with all
formulas intact was provided to any MSD personnel.
Black 8z Veatch has not provide an electronic copy, with all formulas intact, of the referenced
May 5, 2011 MSD wastewater utility cost of service study (i.e. May 10, 2011 MSD Wastewater
Rate Proposal) to any MSD personnel.
4-4. Has Black & Veatch provided access to any MSD personnel to view an electronic
copy, with all formulas intact, of the May 5, 2011 MSD wastewater utility cost of service study?
If so, please identify who from MSD was provided access to review an electronic copy of the
class cost of service study, when it occurred, and identify the Black & Veatch personnel who
provided the access.
RESPONDER: Jan Zimmerman, MSD Director of Finance
RESPONSE: Pursuant to verbal clarification provided by MIEC's Attorney John Kindschuh
during a phone conversation on July 1, 2011, MIEC made it clear that "an electronic copy, with all
formulas intact, of the May 10, 2011 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Rate
Proposal" really meant the Black & Veatch Rate Model in its electronic format. MSD will assume
that MIEC's meaning is the same for this discovery request. Pursuant to that and the clarification of
the dates and terms of the referenced cost of service study (i.e. MSD Wastewater Rate Proposal)
provided in the District's response to Question 4-3, Black & Veatch has not provided access to an
electronic copy, with all formulas intact, of the referenced May 5, 2011 MSD wastewater utility
cost of service study to any MSD personnel.
4-5. Have any MSD staff members requested to see an electronic copy, with all
formulas intact, of the May 10, 2011 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District wastewater rate
proposal? If so, please identify who from MSD made the request, when it occurred, and describe
how Black & Veatch responded to the request.
RESPONDER: Susan Myers, MSD General Counsel
4
EXHIBIT MSD 36A
RESPONSE: Pursuant to verbal clarification provided by MIEC's Attorney John Kindschuh
during a phone conversation on July 1, 2011, MIEC made it clear that "an electronic copy, with all
formulas intact, of the May 10, 2011 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Rate
Proposal" really meant the Black & Veatch Rate Model in its electronic format. MSD will assume
that MIEC's meaning is the same for this discovery request. Pursuant to that, the answer is no.
4-6. Have any MSD staff members requested to see an electronic copy, with all
formulas intact, of the May 5, 2011 MSD wastewater utility cost of service study? If so, please
identify who from MSD made the request, when it occurred, and describe how Black & Veatch
responded to the request.
RESPONDER: Jan Zimmerman, MSD Director of Finance
RESPONSE: Pursuant to verbal clarification provided by MIEC's Attorney John Kindschuh
during a phone conversation on @y 1, 2011, MIEC made it clear that "an electronic copy, with all
formulas intact, of the May 10, 2011 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Rate
Proposal" really meant the Black & Veatch Rate Model in its electronic format. MSD will assume
that MIEC's meaning is the same for this discovery request. Pursuant to that and the clarification of
the dates and terms of the referenced May 5, 2011 cost of service study (i.e. MSD Wastewater Rate
Proposal) provided in the District's response to Question 4-3, no MSD personnel has requested to
see the Black & Veatch electronic copy, with all formulas intact, of the referenced May 5, 2011
MSD wastewater utility cost of service study.
/h
Susan Myers, General Counsel
METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
2350 Market Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
Email: smyers@stlmsd.com
Tel: (314) 768-6200
Fax: (314) 768-6372
/\/
5
EXHIBIT MSD 36A
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on the 28h day of July, 2011:
An electronic copy of the foregoing instrument was emailed to the Secretary of the Rate
Commission c/o jfenton@stlmsd.com
SECRETARY OF RATE COMMISSION: Ms. Nancy Bowser
Secretary of Rate Commission
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
2350 Market Street
St. Louis, MO 63103-2555
robowser@swbell.net
At the request of Rate Commission Counsel, one paper original and associated Exhibits
are held at the Rate Commission office for Commissioner review.
An electronic copy of the foregoing instrument was emailed and one paper copy and associated
Exhibits were couriered to:
RATE COMMISSION LEGAL
COUNSEL:
Lisa O. Stump, Esq.
Lashly & Baer, P.C.
714 Locust Street
St. Louis, MO 63101
lostump@lashlybaer.com
RATE COMMISSION CONSULTANT: Mr. William Stannard
President
Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc.
3013 Main Street
Kansas City, MO 64108
wstannard@raftelis.com
COVIDIEN:
Mr. Randy Meyer
Utility Manager
Covidien
3600 North 2nd Street
St. Louis, MO 63147
Randy.Meyer@covidien@com
6
EXHIBIT MSD 36A
ROBERT A. MUELLER: Mr. Robert A. Mueller
16 Ladue Crest Lane
St. Louis, MO 63124
ramreco@sbcglobal.net
BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL: Ms. Lisa Langeneckert
Sandberg, Phoenix and VonGontard P.C.
One City Centre, Suite 1500
St. Louis, MO 63101
langeneckert@sandbergphoenix.com
MISSOURI INDUSTRIAL ENERGY John Kindschuh, Esq.
CONSUMERS: Bryan Cave, LLP
211 N. Broadway, Suite 3600
St. Louis, MO 63102
John.kindschuh@bryancave.com
Diana M. Vuylesteke, Esq.
Bryan Cave, LLP
211 N. Broadway, Suite 3600
St. Louis, MO 63102
dmvuylesteke@bryancave.com
Susan Myers, General Counsel
METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
2350 Market Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
Email: smyers@stlmsd.com
Tel: (314) 768-6200
Fax: (314) 768-6372
7