Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
Exhibit MSD 13 - FY 2012 Operating Budget Document
Exhibit MSD 13 The Government Finance Officer Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Missouri, for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010.* In order to receive this award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communications device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. cD GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Distinguished Budget Presentation Award PRESMImTO Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Missouri Fenix Fiscal Year &PM July I, 70I0 Peckac 6cenDisca # The Finance Department of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District has received the Government Finance Officer Association (GFOA) Award for Distinguished Budget Reporting for twenty-four consecutive years. This award is the highest form of recognition in govemmental budgeting and the staff works very hard to improve the Budget Document each year. r HOW TO USE THIS BUDGET DOCUMENT The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District's Annual Budget is comprised of three separate documents: The Annual Budget (this book), the Capital Improvement and Replacement Supplemental Budget (CIRP), and the Strategic Business and Operating Plan. This budget document is designed to communicate to the public concise and readable information about District policies, financial structure, operations and its organizational framework. It displays the District's goals, strategies and budget for the Fiscal Year (July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012) and analyzes the District's revenues and expenditures. The document is broken down into the following sections: Introduction: The introductory section contains the Table of Contents which lists in detail the schedules that make up each section of the budget document. Also included is a District Organizational Chart with a listing of appointed Board members and key personnel followed by information about the history of the District, services provided by the District, and significant demographic information. Budget Message: The Executive Director's Budget Message provides an outline of the major assumptions relating to the annual budget, a general indication of the status of the District's finances and service levels, short and long-term goals and other significant information. Budget Summary: This section starts with a recap of the District's Strategic Planning Process, Vision Statement, Mission, Values, Goals, and Strategies. A Gantt Chart (Timeline) that lists each department's objectives as they relate to the District's overall Strategic Business and Operating Plan and performance against prior year's objectives is also included. Each department's objectives coincide with MSD's goals and strategies. As each department works towards obtaining their objectives, it will support the District in its mission to protect the public's health, safety and water environment by responsibly providing wastewater and stormwater management. The Budget Summary section presents the proposed revenues and expenditures of the District as a whole along with Budget Policies and Procedures, Budget Calendar, and Allocated Positions. Capital Improvement & Replacement Program Summary: This section provides an overview of the upcoming and continued capital projects. These projects are funded from a variety of sources, including user charges, fund balance reserves, taxes, grants, and State Revolving Fund (SRF) and revenue bonds. In addition, a Multi -decade CIRP needs table, a proposed five-year timeline, and the CIRP resolution are presented. General Fund: The General Fund section starts with an overview of the fund. Schedules follow that show the revenues and expenses for the total General Fund. The color tabs divide General Fund into the individual departmental expense sections. Each department reflects their recent accomplishments, department objectives, budget and staffing. Following the many General Fund department expense sections, the document is then broken down into other fund groups. 7 Revenue Funds: All user charge revenue is recorded in either the Wastewater or Stormwater Revenue Funds. These funds represent actual, budgeted and projected wastewater and stormwater user charge revenue with projected service levels. A portion of the revenue is allocated to General Fund for daily operating and maintenance costs and a portion to the Debt Service Funds to retire outstanding revenue bonds issued for capital improvements. The balance of the revenue is transferred to the Capital Improvement and Replacement Program Fund, the Water Backup Fund and the Emergency Fund. Operations, Maintenance, and Construction Improvement (OMCI) Funds: provide actual, budgeted and projected revenues, expenditures and fund balances of the taxing subdistdcts. The primary source of revenue was generated from a voter approved subdistrict ad valorem tax levy. This revenue is restricted for stormwater related capital improvement projects within the individual taxing subdistrict, with the exception of the Bonfils and Meramec subdistricts which are dedicated to wastewater projects. Construction Funds: provides actual, budgeted and projected revenues, capital improvement expenditures and fund balances including a detail listing of planned projects and costs. Debt Service Funds: presents actual, budgeted and projected debt service obligations for the $775 million in revenue bonds issued by the District over the past four years. Special Funds: This section details actual, budgeted, and projected revenues, expenditures and fund balances of the various special funds such as the Water Back-up Insurance Fund and the Emergency Funds. Ordinances: The last few sections contain the text of the ordinances concerning the revenues and expenditures, taxes and user charges covered in this document. Glossary: A list of the terminology used in this document that is either technical in nature or unique to the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. Each term is given a short description that defines it within the context it is used. In addition to this main budget document, a Capital Improvement and Replacement Program (CIRP) Budget Supplement is available. The CIRP Budget Supplement provides detailed descriptions and locations of the sewer projects planned for Fiscal Year 2012. iii METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT FY 2012 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1, PREFACE A. GFOA Distinguished Budget Award i B. How to Use this Budget Document u C. Table of Contents iv D. Governing Body vii E. MSD 2012 Organization Chart viii F. MSD History ix G. MSD Demographics x H. Service Area Map xi H. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S BUDGET MESSAGE 1 III. BUDGET SUMMARY A. Budget and Financial Policies 5 B. Strategic Business & Operating Plan (SBOZ) 12 C. Budget Process 18 D. Sources and Uses 21 E. User Charges 27 F. Proposed Expenditures 33 G. Outstanding Revenue Bonds & Estimated Debt Capacity 34 H. District -Wide Expenses 36 I. Allocated Positions 37 J. Consolidated Statement of Change in Fund Balance 38 K. Segmentation of Operating and Storm Water Budgets 41 L. List of Funds 44 M. Fund Basis vs. GAAP Basis Statement of Operations 45 IV. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAM A. Summary 47 B. Wastewater Construction Projects 52 C. Wastewater Engineering Projects 54 D. Stormwater Construction Projects 56 E. Stormwater Engineering Projects 58 F. Continued Wastewater Projects 59 G. Continued Stomrwater Projects 61 H. CIRP Funding Timeline 63 1. Multi -decade CIRP Needs 64 V. GENERAL FUND A. General Fund Description 65 B. Statement of Changes in Fund Balance 66 C. General Fund Budget by Natural Account Group 68 D. Significant Budget Changes 69 E. General Fund Operating Expense Budget and Variance 70 F. General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection 77 G. General Fund Expenditures by Organization 1. Board of Trustees 81 2. Rate Commission 87 3. Secretary -Treasurer 93 4. Civil Service Commission 105 5. Executive Director 111 6. General Counsel 121 7. Human Resources 131 8. Finance 145 9. Information Systems 157 ID. Engineering 169 II. Operatioas 183 iv VL REVENUE FUNDS A. Revenue Funds Description B. Changes in Fund Balance - Consolidated C. Changes in Fund Balance - Individual Fund Statements I. Wastewater Revenue Fund (3306) (a) Projected User Charge Revenue Wastewater Revenue Fund 2. Stormwater Revenue Fund (3307) (a) Projected User Charge Revenue Stormwater Revenue Fund VD. CONSTRUCTION FUNDS A. Construction Funds Description B. Changes in Fund Balance - Consolidated C. Changes in Fund Balance - Individual Fund Statements 1. Caulks Creek Construction (6610) 2. Williams Creek Constuction (6620) 3. Capital Improvement Trust Fund (6650) 4. Sanitary Replacement Fund (6660) 5. Stonnwater Replacement Fund (6700) VIE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE and CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS 11. Hwy 67 & Cambria Creek (5572) 246 12. Loretta -Joplin (5574) 247 211 13. Lynn Haven (5575) 248 212 14. Malin Creek (5576) 249 15. Marlborough (5577) 251 214 16. North Afilon (5579) 252 17.NorthKith&(5580) 253 215 18. Paddock Creek (5581) 255 216 19. Sugar Creek (5583) 756 20. University City Branch of River des Peres (5584) 257 217 21.Upper Paddock Creek (5585) 259 22. Vinita Park (5586) 260 23. Watkins Creek (5587) 261 24. Wedgewood Creek (5588) 262 25. Wellston (5589) 263 219 26. Missouri River-Bonfils (5590) 264 220 27. Lower Meramec River Basin (5591) 266 28. Shrewsbury Branch of River des Peres (5592) 267 222 29. Seminary Branch of River des Peres (5593) 268 223 30. Black Creek (5594) 269 224 225 227 A OMCI Funds Description 229 B. Changes in Fund Balance - Consolidated 230 C. Changes in Fund Balance - Individual Fund Statements I. District -wide Stormwater(5110) 232 2. Stormwater Operations & Maintenance (5130) 233 3. Consolidated less Districtwide Funds 234 4. Clayton -Central (5563) 235 5. Coldwater Creek (5564) 237 6. Creee Coeur-Frontenac (5565) 239 7. Deer Creek (5566) 240 8. Blackjack (Dellwood) (5567) 242 9. Fountain Creek (5569) 243 10. Gravois Creek (5571) 244 IX. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS A. Debt Service Funds Description 271 B. Changes in Fund Balance - Consolidated 772 C. Revenue Bonds - Wastewater Revenue Bond Service 274 D. Changes in Fund Balance - Individual Fund Statements 1. Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Fund (2804) 275 2. Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Fund (2808) 276 3. Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Fund (2810) 277 4. Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Fund (2812) 278 E. Wastewater Debt Service Amortization Schedule 279 v X. SPECIAL FUNDS A. Special Funds Description 281 B. Changes in Fund Balance— Consolidated 282 C Changes in Fund Balance - Individual Fund Statements 1. Improvement Fund (4102) 284 2. Water Backup Insurance & Reimbursement (4104) 286 3. Wastewater Emergency Fund (4122) 287 4. Stormwater Emergency Fund (4123) 789 XI. BUDGET ORDINANCE 291 XII. TAX ORDINANCE 299 XID. USER CHARGE ORDINANCES 309 M.GLOSSARY 335 vi Governing Body Voters in 1954 established a six member Board of Trustees (Board) to be the governing body of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. Three members are appointed by the Mayor of the City of St. Louis and three members are appointed by the St. Louis County Executive. MSD's Board members are trustees of public property and public funds and are responsible to the customers they serve. Francis G. Slay Mayor — City of St. Louis John Goffstein 03115113 David Visintainer 03115112 James H. Buford, Vice Chair 03115114 Charlie A. Dooley County Executive — St. Louis County Eddie Ross, Jr. 03114113 Robert Berry, Chair 03114112 Gerald Feldhaus TBD Management Staff Jeffrey Theerman Executive Director Susan Myers General Counsel Karl J. Tyminski Secretary -Treasurer Jonathon Sprague Director of Operations Brian Hoelscher Director of Engineering Janice M. Zimmerman Director of Finance Barbara Mohn Director of Information Systems Vicki Taylor Edwards Director of Human Resources YII MSD 2012 ORGANIZATION CHART %� Rate Commission r Internal Auditor f General Counsel Human Resources Mayor/ County Exec, Board of Trustees (Executive Director (Information Systems etivil Service Commission (Secretary Treasurer viii etropolitan St. Louis Sewer District klI The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District was created in 1954 to provide a metropolitan -wide sewer system and drainage facility to serve the City of St. Louis and most of the more heavily populated areas of St. Louis County. Before MSD's creation, the City of St. Louis, various municipalities and private sewer companies provided sewer service that primarily included only collecting and transporting sewage from small geographic areas to nearby rivers and streams with little or no treatment. Most of the municipalities or private sewer companies serving the area did not have the jurisdictional authority or financial resources needed to eliminate health hazards from untreated sewage. When the District began operations, it took over the publicly owned wastewater and stormwater drainage facilities within its jurisdiction and began the construction of an extensive system of collector and interceptor sewers and treatment facilities. In 1977, voters approved the District's annexation of a 270 square mile area of the lower Missouri River and lower Meramec River watersheds, The District purchased the Fee Fee Trunk Sewer Company and the Missouri Bottoms Sewer Company in 1978. MSD has since annexed other property and acquired other investor -owned or municipally operated systems. The District's service area now encompasses 570 square miles, including all 62 square miles of the City of St. Louis and 508 square miles of St. Louis County. The current population served by the District is approximately 1.3 million. MSD is organized pursuant to Article VI, Section 30 of the Missouri State Constitution that empowers the people of St. Louis County and the City of St. Louis "to establish a metropolitan district for functional administration of services common to the area". MSD is the only district established pursuant to that section of the Missouri State Constitution. The Proposed Plan of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (the Plan), approved by the voters in 1954 and amended in 2000, established the District. The Plan describes the District as "a body corporate, a municipal corporation and a political subdivision of the state". As a political subdivision of the state, MSD is comparable to a county or city, such as the city of St. Louis or St. Louis County, only with powers and responsibilities limited to a wastewater collection and treatment and stormwater management. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT AT A GLANCE INCORPORATIONIGOVERNMENT Established February 9,1954 Form of government Political subdivision of the State of Missouri The Plan of the District was drafted by a Hoard of Freeholders and approved by the voters in 1954 and amended in 2000. A six -member Board of Trustees — three appointed by the Mayor of the City of St. Louis and three appointed by the County Executive of St. Louis County, sets the policy governing MSD. Board Member Term Expires Robert Berry, Chair (County) 311412012 David Visintainer (City) 3/1512012 Eddie Ross, Jr. (County) 3/1412013 John Goffstein (City) 3115/2013 James H. Buford, Vice Chair (City) 3/15/2014 Gerald Feldhaus (County) TBD Board meetings are held the second Thursday of the month and are open to the public. Various citizen groups are formed to submit comments OR ballot propositions and key District initiatives. The voters in the community must approve all debt issues and tax issues. Bond Ratings Series 2004A Insured Bonds Moody's Aaa S&P AAA Fitch AAA Underlying• Moody's Aa1 S&P AA+ Fitch AAA FY12 Total Operating Revenue $225,680,000 FY12 Total Operating Expense $208,253,663 MAJOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY MSD Wastewater Treatment Sanitary & Stormwater Maintenance Floodwater Control Pump Station Operation & Maintenance Monitoring of Industrial Waste Issuance of Pretreatment Discharge Permits Engineering Design and Specification Construction of Sewer Lines Plan Reviews and Approvals Issuance of Connection Permits DEMOGRAPHICS Land Area 570 square miles Population 1.3 million No. of Households - STL City & County..546,744 No. of Registered Voters 937,118 Median Age of Residents -City 33.9 yrs Median Age of Residents -County 39.9 yrs Median Household Income -City $34,065 Median Household Income -County Labor Force Employment Unemployment - St. Louis City - St Louis County 9.2% - National Average 9.3% $56,939 670,565 Avg. 607,834 Avg. 62,731 Avg. 11.9% Cultural Institutions & Attractions: -St. Louis Art Museum, History Museum, St. Louis Zoo & Science Center all located in Forest Park -Saint Louis Symphony -Missouri Botanical Garden -St. Louis Cardinals Baseball Team -St. Louis Rams Football Team -St. Louis Blues Hockey Team -Gateway Arch -Grants Farm -Six Flags over Mid -America DEMOGRAPHICS, Cont. Major Industries: The central business district for the entire region is downtown St. Louis located just west of the Mississippi River and the Gateway Arch. Major employers include: InBev-Anheuser Busch, BJC Healthcare, Boeing, Washington University in St. Louis, SSM Healthcare, Schnucks Markets, Wal- Mart Stores, United States Postal Service and St. john's Mercy Health Care. Fortune 500 companies include: Emerson Electric, Charter Communications, Peabody Energy and Graybar Electric. FY2011 SERVICE STATISTICS Single Family Accounts 360,876 Multi -Family Accounts 41,559 Commercial -Industrial Accounts . 24,702 Total Accounts 427,137 Sewer Lines 9,738 Miles Treatment Plants 7 Plants Sewage Treatment: Average flow in million gallons per day 371 MGD Treatment Capacity (MGD) 528 Annual engineering maximum plant capacity (millions of gallons) 192,629 Amount treated annually (millions of gallons) 135, 299 Unused Capacity (millions gallons) 57,330 Percentage of capacity utilized 70% Engineering Services: Sewer Plans Approved 487 Sewer Construction Permits Issued 2,268 Sewer Connection Permits Issued 542 x Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer 4I1/4\ District Coldwater WWTP Service Areas i COLDWATER CREEK hlissoud River WWfP A MISSOURI RIVER RIS$ELL POINT. WAeli MERA lEC Grand Claim VWVTP RIVER ► DES PERES Fenton WAITP 1 Bissell Point MVTP _ernavV,NyiP Loser Mera eov r I P xi FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET XII MelroseObn St. Louis Sewer District 23soStree St lat, 03103 May 5, 2011 Board of Trustees Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District 2350 Market Street St. Louis, MO 63103 Dear Trustees: The mission of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) is to protect the public's health, safety, and water environment by responsibly providing wastewater and stormwater management. In fulfilling our mission, we focus on delivering sound fiscal management and fostering a business -focused culture throughout the organization. As we build upon our progress over the past several years and move into fiscal year 2012, the District will focus on several key areas of its overall operations: STRATEGIC BUSINESS AND OPERATING PLAN (SBOP) — The District's management is committed to running this utility like a business and making it accountable to our customers and community stakeholders. A key aspect of this effort is the District's Strategic Business and Operating Plan (SBOP). The fiscal year 2012 Strategic Business and Operating Plan (SBOP) is a business -focused blueprint for serving our customers now and into the future. It is a plan that puts the customers and the St. Louis community first, The SBOP is tied to the budgeting process to ensure that initiatives are properly funded. Each department prepares a base budget that covers funding for its day-to-day operations, and an incremental budget for strategic activities that are to be implemented throughout the budget year. A detailed budget review process ensures an in-depth review of all budgetary requests. If fiscal constraints require reduced funding, the costs of strategic objectives are identified so that proper decisions can be made. WASTEWATER PROJECTS - Perhaps the most important part of MSD's mission today is the execution of the multi -billion dollar, multi -decade Capital Improvement and Replacement Program (CIRP). The long-term goals of the CIRP are to protect the health and safety of our St. Louis community through the renewal and improvement of the District's existing wastewater collection and treatment capabilities. As we continue our progress on this important program, more and more work will be done on the collection system itself. In fiscal year 2012, MSD plans 49 new or continuing wastewater projects, located throughout the District's service area, totaling $145.8 million. These projects are funded primarily from the Sanitary Replacement Fund, and represent $142.9 million in new projects and $2.9 million in continued projects. STORMWATER - The Missouri Department of Natural Resources has issued a Phase II Stormwater permit to MSD, St. Louis County, and 59 county municipalities. Under the provisions of this permit, MSD is the St. Louis Coordinating Authority for our separate municipal stormwater sewer system. St. Louis County and the municipalities are co-permittees. Per the Phase II Storm Water Management Plan, MSD has again committed significant resources to this important effort. Not only does this work help us meet MSD's legal obligations as a stormwater permit holder and as the St. Louis Coordinating Authority, but it significantly reduces the overall compliance burden incurred by our co-permittees. Such an approach allows for a comprehensive and meaningful direction to our community's Phase II Stormwater efforts. The District has 2,980 miles of stormwater sewers that have received little to no maintenance. With the implementation of an impervious based stormwater user charge in 2008, MSD hired additional staff to adhere to a consistent maintenance level for our entire stormwater sewer system. As the new stormwater charge was fully implemented over several years, MSD also planned to work with the community and its customers to make additional stormwater services — such as the construction of new stormwater sewers where none currently exist, erosion control, etc. — available to the entire community. Unfortunately, in July 2010, a Lincoln County judge ruled that the stormwater user charge was invalid. This ruling was made in the case of Zweig, et. al. vs. MSD, a class action lawsuit that was filed over the validity of the impervious based stormwater user charge. The July 2010 ruling forced MSD to reinstate a previous system of flat charges and property taxing districts to pay for stormwater service and to cut $15.5 million in stormwater services and projects from the current budget. Due to how the taxing districts were previously established, customers inside of 1-270 will receive very basic stormwater services, while customers outside of 1-270 will receive virtually no stormwater service other than those services that are required by state and federal regulations. In fiscal year 2012, the District tentatively plans 19 stormwater projects, including 7 continuing projects from fiscal year 2011, totaling $7.6 million. Due to the invalidation of the impervious based stormwater user charge, funding for stormwater projects will no longer be available after fiscal year 2012. MSD has filed an appeal of the judge's ruling. Outside of if the appeal is successful or not, the issue of stormwater funding that provides effective and equal service must be solved. Without proper funding, chronic stormwater problems — particularly those outside of 1-270 — will only get worse. This is unfair to customers and is not sustainable over the long term. For the sake of our community and our customers, MSD will continue its work to address this critical issue in an equitable and sustainable manner. ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS RETOOLING - Our business software applications help us do everything from generating payroll to managing customer calls to producing work orders and financial statements. For years now, we've dealt with a patchwork of systems that are not well -integrated, not good at sharing data and are often so old that finding software support is difficult — if not impossible. Beginning in 2007, we launched the first phase of the Enterprise System (ES) Retooling project that will replace all our patchwork of software systems with a single, more efficient system. Step one required us to consolidate and upgrade our Geographic Information System (GIS) so that we could better integrate map data with other MSD databases. In 2009, the project continued in a big way as we tackled the software applications that run our core business activities: asset management and work order processing, including 2 purchasing. We trained 450 employees at three different training centers in these new processes. We successfully implemented the new system in November 2009. 2010 marked major steps forward in our ES Retooling efforts. Now online, our new $13 million Oracle Financial Business Suite combines our patchwork of financial, project management, payroll, benefits and budgeting functions into a single integrated system designed to enable us all to work smarter and more efficiently. While we still have significant work to do to in completing our ES Retooling efforts, we are now in a much better position to forecast our needs, share data between departments, and plan our future. We expect this work to pay for itself in six to eight years, while addressing MSD's business needs for years to come. CHARTER CHANGE COMMISSION— We are required to have a commission of citizens review our charter every 10 years and recommend changes to our Board of Trustees. If the Trustees agree, the potential changes are placed on the ballot in both St. Louis City and St. Louis County for voter approval. Each group of voters would have to approve changes before they would take effect. Twelve citizens from St. Louis City and County were appointed by our Board of Trustees to serve on the commission, and they reviewed the charter line by line. MSD staff also compiled a list of potential changes to the charter that have been raised by stakeholders, trustees, and staff in the past. (This list was not a set of staff recommendations, nor was it intended to be all inclusive. Rather, it was a means to help make the commission aware of issues that have been brought up in years past.) In May 2010, the commission submitted an extensive report to MSD's Board of Trustees that contained a series of recommendations for the Board to consider. Since that time, Board committees have been reviewing the recommendations. Once the review process is complete, the Board will make a decision on what recommendations should be submitted to area voters for approval. This process is expected to conclude during fiscal year 2012. COMMUNITY EDUCATION & OUTREACH — Green infrastructure is becoming more popular both across the country and in our St. Louis community. As part of its support for green initiatives, MSD launched its rain barrel program in 2009, selling over 1,500 rain barrels to customers. This program continued in 2010 and, due to ongoing demand, will continue in 2011. In September, MSD and the City of St. Louis' Land Reutilization Authority (LRA) finalized an agreement for a 3 million dollar pilot green infrastructure program in the combined sewer portion of MSD's service area. This pilot program is meant to help understand the regulatory, logistical, financial, and educational challenges that will need to be managed as green infrastructure is utilized to address sewer overflows. If successful, similar type programs may be implemented throughout the St. Louis area. MSD also continued its efforts to promote the use of rain gardens and impervious pavement surfaces as part of broader efforts to educate the public on steps our community can take to reduce water pollution due to urban stormwater runoff. These efforts include working with partners such as the Deer Creek Watershed Alliance and the Missouri Botanical Garden, among others. District staff has also setup educational booths at community events, such as fairs and festivals, to directly reach the public and update them on MSD's green efforts. 3 We are also reaching out via other outreach efforts — such as neighborhood project meetings and Phase II Stormwater activities. In fiscal year 2012, we will continue these efforts to educate and enlist the support of the public. DIVERSITY — Minority/Women Business Enterprise (MWBE) firms have had extensive participation in the District's Capital Improvement and Replacement Program (CIRP). In fiscal year 2010, MWBE participation in construction projects was 29.90%, and MWBE participation in design and consulting projects was 30.27%. As evidenced by these numbers, MWBE participation in the CIRP has been an important part of our diversity efforts. In addition, MWBE participation in general purchasing transactions was 5.3%. As MSD continues the important work we are doing to protect our environment, we will continue our efforts to ensure the Distdct staff and our service providers are reflective of the diverse community we serve. BUDGET SUMMARY — As the Executive Director of MSD, I affirm that rates and charges as currently implemented will generate sufficient revenues to meet all expenditures as proposed in the fiscal year 2012 budget and will provide adequate operating liquidity as directed in the District's Debt Management Policy. Furthermore, current rates and charges are adequate to ensure Distdct compliance with all obligations as provided in the Master Bond Ordinance, adopted by the Trustees on April 22, 2004. The proposed fiscal year 2012 operating budget includes $156.6 million for day-to-day operations reflecting a $5.5 million or 3.7% increase over the fiscal year 2011 budget, and $3.5 million for the District's Water Backup Program. The budget also includes $1.8 million for repairs to the District's Wastewater System under the CIRP. The total operating budget for fiscal year 2012 is $161.9 million. Proposed expenditures for the fiscal year 2012 annual budget are separated into three main categories and are summarized as follows: Operations CIRP Debt Service $178.3 million 153.4 million 45.9 million TOTAL FY12 BUDGET $377.6 million In fiscal year 2012, we pledge to continue to scrutinize our business practices, deliver sound fiscal management, and be fully accountable to the public for the ways in which we spend their money. We will continue to improve our customer service levels and our efforts to inform the community of our operations and needs. We will persist in addressing the health, safety, and environmental needs of our St. Louis community. In short, we will work to prepare the District, its customers, and our community for the challenges of the future. Sincerely, Jeffrey Theerman, Executive Director, P.E. 4 BUDGET and FINANCIAL POLICIES The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District's budget and financial policies set forth the basic framework for the District's overall management of operations taking into account changing circumstances and conditions. These policies assist the decision making process of The Board and provide guidelines for evaluating both current activities and proposals for future programs. Balanced Budget Policy Section 7.130 of the District's Charter requires a balanced budget be submitted to The Board for approval. • In no event shall the total amount of proposed expenditures for the budget year from any fund exceed the estimated revenues to be actually received plus any unencumbered balance or less any deficit estimated for the beginning of the budget year. • The Annual Budget must be balanced. All funds, Department operations and services, supported by the financial resources of the District, must function within the limits of these resources identified or available specifically to them. A balance must be struck between revenues and expenditures so that the public can realize the benefits of a strong and stable utility. By law, budgets cannot exceed available resources, defined as revenues generated in the current period added to balances carried forward from prior years. • Pursuant to the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Charter, Section 7.130, not later than the fifteenth day of March in each year, the Executive Director will submit to The Board a budget for the ensuing fiscal year, an explanatory budget message, and a general appropriation ordinance conforming with such budget. The budget shall provide a financial plan for the budget year for all District and subdistrict funds. Operating Budget Policies • Historical levels of funding and expenditures shall be included in the budget to provide comparisons. Financial forecasting of future requirements shall be included to provide estimates of future financial and operating conditions. • Whenever approved by The Board, the Executive Director may transfer any unencumbered appropriation balances or portions from one classifiation of expenditure to another. • Per Section 7.160 of the Charter, at any time during the budget year upon recommendation of the Executive Director, the Board may by ordinance make supplementary appropriations if (1) the Executive Director estimates that such appropriations will not result in a deficit at the end of the budget year, or (2) the Board shall adopt an ordinance or ordinances consistent MTh the requirements in Section 7.140 providing additional revenues and the Executive Director estimates that the amount to be actually received therefrom during the budget year will equal or exceed the amount of such supplementary appropriations. 5 BUDGET and FINANCIAL POLICIES (continued) • The District will maintain a budgetary control system to ensure adherence to the budget and will prepare regular reports comparing actual revenues and expenditures to budgeted amounts. Basis of Budgeting • The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District prepares its annual budget utilizing a modified accrual basis of accounting. Modified accrual accounting is the process of formally recording encumbrances in the ledger as reductions to the budgetary accounts to ensure that total actual expenditures plus related commitments do not exceed appropriations. The funds and accounts of the District are maintained on the encumbrance method to demonstrate compliance with finance related legal and contractual provisions. Revenues are recognized when they are obligated to the District (for example, Wastewater User Charges are recognized as revenue when bills are produced). Appropriations lapse at year-end only to the extent of the unencumbered balances. Open encumbrances at year-end are reviewed and closed, if not associated with a specific contract, service or vendor. Revenue Policies • The District will seek to maintain a diversified and stable revenue system to minimize short -run fluctuations in any one revenue source. • The District MI follow an aggressive policy of collecting revenues. • The District will establish wastewater user charges and stormwater user charges fees and tax rates at a level related to the full cost (operating, direct, indirect and capital) of providing the service. Voter approval is required to implement tax rate increases. • The DistrictMI review wastewater fees and stormwater user charges, and fees annually to determine if the revenues support the cost of the service. Rate increases to generate needed revenues are required, per Charter Section 7.040, to be submitted to the District's Rate Commission for review and recommendation to The Board. • The major revenue sources of the District include Wastewater User Charges, Stormwater User Charges, Taxes, Revenue Bonds, Grant Income, Investment Income and Connection Fees. 6 BUDGET and FINANCIAL POLICIES (continued) Investment Policies • The District will maximize the return on all cash available for investment without sacrifice of safety or necessary liquidity. • The Secretary -Treasurer will develop and maintain a comprehensive, well -documented investment reporting system. This system will provide The Board with appropriate investment performance information. Debt Policies • The Board shall authorize and approve all debt issued for the purpose of financing portions of the District's CIRP as well as debt that may be issued for the purpose of refunding any outstanding District debt. • The District will confine long-term borrowing to finance authorized capital improvement projects or to refund, on a current or advanced basis, outstanding debt obligations. • The District may issue long-term debt (general obligation or revenue bonds) where it is deemed that capital improvements should not be financed from current revenues. Long-term borrowing will not be used to finance current operations or normal maintenance. Long-term debt will be self-supporting and structured such that the weighted average maturity of the debt does not exceed the expected useful life of the capital project. • The District may issue (1) general obligation bonds to finance capital improvement projects that result in community -wide benefits (2) revenue bondato finance capital improvement projects serviced from the net revenues from a particular enterprise, such as sewer service. • Issuance of general obligation bonds requires 57% approval of those voting at primary and general elections and a 67% approval at other elections. Issuance of revenue bonds requires simple majority approval of those voting. • No general obligation bonds shall be issued in an amount, which together with existing indebtedness of the District or a subdistrict exceeds in the aggregate 5% of the value of all taxable tangible properly in the District and its subdistricts. • Any general obligation bonds issued under the District charter shall mature over period not exceeding 20 years from the date contracted. • For the purpose of refunding, extending, or unifying the whole or any part of its valid bonded indebtedness, the District may issue refunding bonds not exceeding the principal amount of the outstanding indebtedness to be refunded and the accrued interest to the date of such refunding bonds. 7 BUDGET and FINANCIAL POLICIES (continued) Debt Policies (Continued) • Short-term borrowing may be utilized as authorized by District Charter, Section 3.020(13), for the temporary funding of capital projects or for operational cash flow deficits subject to the following policies: • District may issue short-term debt when there is a defined and adequate repayment source. Lines of Credit may be considered as an alternative to other short-term borrowing options if it is determined to be more cost-effective. • Other short-term debt, including commercial paper notes, may be used when it provides an interest rate advantage or as interim financing until market conditions are more favorable for long-term debt issuance. • Per Charter Section 3.020, the District may use short-term debt to provide for the borrowing of money in anticipation of the collection of taxes and revenues for the fiscal year. The amount of such loans shall at no time exceed 90% of the estimated collectible taxes and revenues for the year yet uncollected. Reserve Policies • The operating reserve is a balance maintained in the General Fund, Construction Funds and Special Funds combined to accommodate fluctuations in annual revenues and expenditures. The District currently maintains a minimum fund balance of 60 days or 16.4% of the next year's annual operating expenditures for working capital. • The District will maintain a Storm Water Emergency Fund with a minimum balance of $250,000 and a Waste Water Emergency Fund with a minimum balance of $500,000. • The District will maintain a Wastewater Backup Insurance and Reimbursement Fund with a minimum balance of $1 million dollars. • Funds will be reserved to comply with the terms and conditions of the debt instruments used to finance capital improvement projects. • Property taxes levied by the District and other revenue received for construction, operations and maintenance in particular taxing subdistricts will be reserved for that use. 8 BUDGET and FINANCIAL POLICIES (continued) Capital Improvement and Replacement Policies • The District shall prepare a long-term plan for wastewater infrastructure projects to relieve backup complaints andlor for the correction of identified sanitary sewer capacity inadequacies and deficiencies andlor for the correction of bypasses and overflows. This plan shall include stormwater projects to prevent flooding and erosion threatening homes and property. This plan shall be used to develop a five year CIRP and make all capital improvements accordingly. This five year plan shall be updated annually. • The Board adopts the CIRP as a planning document, but does not appropriate the identified multi -year expenditures. These expenditures are legally authorized during the year at the time a fixed contract is awarded. • The District will maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect the District's capital investment and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs. Financial and Accounting Policies • An independent audit shall be made of all accounts of the District at least annually by a certified public accounting firm that shall be engaged by The Board. • Monthly financial reports will be submitted to The Board and District Staff. • District financial information will be available through monthly financial statements, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and Annual Budget. • The District will produce annual financial reports in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) as outlined by the Govemmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). 9 BUDGET and FINANCIAL POLICIES (continued) Basis of Accounting The CAFR shows the status of the District's finances on the basis of GAAP. In most cases, this conforms to the way the District prepares its budget. Exceptions are as follows: 1. Principal payments on long-term debt within the Enterprise Funds are applied to the outstanding liability on a GAAP basis, as opposed to being expended on a budget basis. 2. Capital Outlay within the Enterprise Funds are recorded as assets on a GAAP basis and expended on a budget basis. 3. Depreciation expense is recorded on a GAAP basis only. Financial Structure The District's financial structure is organized on the basis of funds, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity with fund specific balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund balances, revenues and expenditures. Governmental resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. Govemmental funds are those through which most govemmental functions are financed. The acquisition, use, and balances of the District's expendable financial resources and the related liabilities are accounted for through govemmental funds. The measurement focus is on the determination of changes in financial position rather than upon net income. The following fund types are used by the District: General Fund The General Fund is the general operating fund of the District. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted far in another fund. The General Fund consists of eleven operating departments: 1. Board of Trustees 2. Rate Commission 3. Civil Service Commission 4. Secretary -Treasurer 5. Executive Director 6. General Counsel 7. Human Resources 8. Finance 9. Information Systems 10. Engineering 11, Operations to BUDGET and FINANCIAL POLICIES (continued) Revenue Funds The Revenue Funds account for all wastewater and stormwater user charges billed to customers. User Charge proceeds are recorded in the Revenue Funds and allocated to the various other funds to cover operation and maintenance costs and capital improvement expenditures. OQerationt Maintenance and Construction Improvement Funds f 0MCII These funds account for the proceeds from tax levies in the various subdistricts. These are primarily stormwater dedicated subdistrict assessments which fund projects, stormwater operations and maintenance specific to each subdistrict's geographic area. There are currently 21 active subdistricts with either a fund balance and/or an active project. Construction Funds The Construction Funds are established to receive and disburse proceeds from revenue sources and restricted for construction of improvements to sewerage and drainage collection systems and treatment facilities. The District has two construction funds that support the majority of the CIRP:1) the Sanitary Replacement Fund and, 2) the Stormwater Replacement Fund. Use of these funds is dedicated to sanitary and stormwater projects, respectively, Debt Service Funds The Debt Service Funds are established for bond issues sold by the District. These funds provide for the accounting of receipt and disbursement of monies designated for payment of principal and interest and redemption of outstanding bond issues. A distinct fund is established for each of the District's bond issues. Special Funds The Special Funds are established to account for specific revenues that are legally restricted to expenditures for particular purposes. The District's current Special Funds consist of the following: 1. Improvement Fund — to account for the cost of any improvements and special tax bills issued for any improvement. 2. Water Backup Insurance and Reimbursement Fund — to account for customer water backup insurance claims resulting from over charged lines or blocked mains. 3. Two Emergency Funds — to account for monies needed to address Wastewater and Stormwater emergencies. Such emergencies require immediate District response. Examples are sewer repairs and replacements to immediately address severe disruption in the operations and maintenance of the District, weather related disruption of District operations, and other disruptions of District services caused by dramatic unforeseen events. Segmentation In FY 2009 the District began presenting a segmentation footnote disclosure to provide investors and the public with more information regarding the separate wastewater and stormwater sources and uses of revenues and expenditures. In FY 2012 the budget is also presented on a segmented basis. 11 FISCAL YEAR 2012 STRATEGIC BUSINESS AND OPERATING PLAN VISION STATEMENT Quality Service Always MISSION STATEMENT To protect the public's health, safety, and water environment by responsibly providing wastewater and stormwater management VALUES Integrity We believe in acting ethically at all times, treating everyone with honesty, fairness, dignity and respect. Teamwork We believe working together towards mutual objectives while practicing open communications, trust, respect and embracing diversity is the best way to accomplish our mission. Excellence and Innovation We are committed to continuous improvement, reliable quality service in an innovative, "can do" approach. The District Employees We know that our success is dependent upon productive, responsible, safety -conscious employees; therefore, we recognize employee contributions and provide opportunities for growth and development. Customer Satisfaction We are dedicated to building strong customer relationships by keeping our commitments and providing value in everything we do. ,p STRATEGIC BUSINESS AND OPERATING PLAN The Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Strategic Business and Operating Plan (SBOP) is a business focused blueprint for serving our ratepayers now and into the future. It is a plan that puts the ratepayers and the St. Louis community first. The SBOP's goals are clear: • Deliver consistent, high quality customer service; • Comply with all legal and regulatory requirements and schedules; • Minimize customer rate increases; and • Be accountable to the St. Louis community. These goals build on the public input and feedback that the District has received since the first SBOP was introduced in 2001. While the FY 2012 goals may appear similar to the original set of goals, the underlying refinements and changes in these goals are significant. The FY 2012 SBOP is easily understood, the goals and resulting strategies are actionable, and the impact of the strategies is measureable. Additionally, the FY 2012 SBOP continues a philosophy that intimately links budgetary expenditures and strategic goals. Under this philosophy, the goals and strategies of the SBOP drive budgetary expenditures and succinctly support the SBOP's success. Further, the budgetary expenditures for the SBOP are business focused and ultimately serve the ratepayer. To achieve these goals, the FY 2012 SBOP proposes six business focused strategies: Strategy 1: Educate and partner with stakeholders to build community support. Essential to our success is an active dialog with stakeholders to improve mutual understanding of the needs of the District and its stakeholders. Education will focus on District goals, needs and initiatives. When possible, we will partner with stakeholders to achieve win -win solutions on common issues. Partnering will take on many forums, for example, discussions with various stakeholder groups; District organized focus groups; employee participation in civic organizations; and regulatory advisory committees. 13 STRATEGIC BUSINESS AND OPERATING PLAN Strategies -continued Strategy 2: Manage the District's costs and revenues to optimize financial impacts. The District continues to face increasing fiscal demands related to regulatory issues affecting its collection and treatment systems. In response to these demands, the District is continuing the important work to protect local waterways, ensure compliance with State and Federal enviromnental regulation, and provide effective, efficient wastewater and stormwater services to the St. Louis community. This work continues in the form of the District's multi -decade, multi -billion dollar Capital Improvement and Replacement Program (CIRP), which was begun in 2003. It is essential the District minimize rate increases in the best interest of its customers. Vigilant, sound financial management, long-term planning and internal audit practices are critical components of this strategy. Strategy 3: Integrate and improve the District's business processes. The goal of this initiative re -engineers and integrates business processes and practices to deliver quality service to District stakeholders and to reflect leading industry standards. Strategy 4: Promote appropriate regulatory standards through proactive government involvement. The most significant factors affecting current and planned rate increases are federal and state regulations and legislation. It is often the case that the implementation of multiple environmental regulations competes for the same, scarce funding resources. As authorities in wastewater and stormwater management, it is essential that we assist in the creation of regulations that will efficiently achieve the desired results. This strategy focuses on our involvement in the formation of regulations and legislation. It is crucial that environmental regulations and legislation be based on sound technical information. The District and others in the regulated community are in the best position to provide such technical information. New environmental regulations and legislation should be practical and provide environmental protection in an appropriate manner. 14 Strategy 5: Address customer service levels and needs, and regulator) requirements through a comprehensive asset management program. Maintaining customer service expectations and regulatory requirements are paramount concerns within the District's mission. However, these must be balanced against the need to cost effectively maintain the District's sanitary and stormwater assets. This can only be achieved through proper investigation, planning, maintenance and capital replacement programs. An asset management program integrates these processes while considering risk and required service levels. The resulting program minimizes the life -cycle costs of infrastructure assets at an acceptable level of risk, while continually delivering established levels of service. An example of the efforts related to this strategy includes preventive maintenance and inspections of the District's collection systems. This work would be prioritized by risk, and this type of proactive activity will reduce customer complaints and provide the Engineering Department with information regarding needed cost effective system improvements. Strategy 6: Create a learning- and business -oriented culture based on competency and accountability. The District's success is dependent upon employees having appropriate competencies and skills within a business culture of accountability. Improving the effectiveness of performance at all levels is at the core of this strategy. Special emphasis will be placed on leadership development, management/supervisory skill training, open communications, general operational and administrative needs. FISCAL YEAR 2012 STRATEGIES The District has developed a set of specific objectives that support these strategies, and thus achieve the goals of the SHOP. Objectives are segmented into "Year 1", "Years 2-3" and "Years 4-5" categories. Combined, these objectives make up the tactical blueprint that we will engage in during FY 2012 and beyond, as we strive to protect the public's health, safety and water environment by responsibly providing wastewater and stormwater management. Achieving these objectives is the responsibility of various departments within the District. These departments and each objective's respective impact are shown on the following chart. 15 STRATEGIC BUSINESS AND OPERATING PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2012 .2016 Strategy Description DEPARTMENTS IMPACTED Quarter To Initiate Years of Additional Milestones Engineering Ececutive Director Finance General Counsel Human Resources Information Technology Operations Secretary Treasurer FY11 FY2012 04 01 02 03 04 zo12 2013 2E14 2015 1 Educate and Partner with Stakeholders to Build Community Support 1. Execute Outreach Programs 2. Strengthen the Legislative Outreach Programs 3. Achieve Vendor Inclusion Objectives 2 Manage the District's Costs and Revenues to Optimize Financial Impacts 1. Increase Collections of Operational Revenue 2. Implement Cost Savings Initiatives 3. Improve Lang Term Financing Plans for District Needs 4. Maximize External Sources of Funding 3 Integrate and Improve the District's Business Processes 1. Analyze Effectiveness of Re -Engineered Business Processes and Identi Future Improvements 2. Perform Evaluation and Develop Recommendation for Re -Engineering of Development Review/Permitting Business Process _ 3. Perform Evaluation and Develop Recommendation for Re -Engineering of CIS (Billing and Customer Care) Business Process _ 4 Promote Appropriate Regulatory Standards Through Proactive Government Involvement 1. Participate in the Formation of New Laws through Proactive Involvement with Federal and State Legislation _ 2. Participate in Stakeholder Groups to Develop Sound Technical Basis for Regulatory Issues 5 Address Customer Service Levels and Needs and Regulatory Requirements Through Comprehensive Asset Management Program 1. Improve Customer Service Levels _ 2. Implement Strategic Stomnealer Operating and Capital Improvement Initiatives - 3. Implement Strategic Wastewater Operating and Capital Improvement Initiatives 4. Expand the Asset Management Program ■ 6 Create a Leaming and Business -oriented Culture Based on Competency and Accountability 1. Improve Organizational Performance through Succession Plannim and Improved Oganizational Communication 2. Increase Individual Performance through Continued Performance Consulting and Training _ 16 STRATEGIC BUSINESS AND OPERATING PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2011 OBJECTIVES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS &aim Strategy Description and Objectives DEPARTMENTS IMPACTED Accomplishments Engineering Executive Director Finance General Counsel Human Resources Information Systems Operations Secretary - Treasurer FY 2011 Objective Completed' 1 Educate and partner with stakeholders tobuild community support 1. Execute the stakeholder outreach programs Y 2. Strengthen the legislative outreach programs Y 3. Achieve Vendor Inclusion objectives N 2 Manage the Districts costs and revenues to optimize financial impacts 1. Increase Collections of Operational Revenue Y 2. Improve long term financing plans for District needs N 3. Identify and obtain new sources of revenue N 4. Implement risk management initiatives to prevent and control losses 3 Leverage appropriate technology to integrate and improve the District's business processes 1. Implement improved business processes Y 2. Implement the District's technology plan tosupport re -engineered business processes, regulatory requirements and customer service needs Y 4 Promote appropriate regulatory standards through proactive government involvement 1. Participate in the formation of new laws through proactive involvement with federal and state legislation Y 2. Participate in stakeholder groups to develop sound technical basis for regulatory issues Y 5 Address customer service levels and needs, and regulatory requirements through comprehensive asset management program 1. Improve customer service levels N 2- Implement strategic stormwateroperating and capital improvement initiatives N 3. Implement strategic wastewater operating and capital improvement initiatives Y 4. Epand the asset management program Y 6 Provide developmental opportunities to all District empbyees to craate a reaming and business oriented cuiture based upon competence, accountability, and open two-way communication 1. Improve the organization through performance accountability initiatives Y 2. Improve communications through all levels of the District Y NOTES: As of 6t30111. If mare than 50%of Ne miesrones Who Objective were met, the Objective was corsidered completed. 17 BUDGET PROCESS The District's Strategic Business and Operating Plan (SBOP) is the key to the development ofthe Annual Budget. The SBOP process begins in July when all Departments are given the opportunity to reassess goals, strategies and objectives and the means for accomplishing them. The budget serves as the tool to communicate the District's long-term plans and policies to the public, details the costs of services and programs and becomes the plan to accomplish the District's goals and objectives during the next fiscal year. The budget process begins in early October with the projection of revenues (wastewater and stormwater user charges, investment and other income). District -wide imperatives and budgetary parameters are established by Executive Management and The Board. The imperatives for this fiscal year include: 1. Evaluate and reduce ! minimize growth of the operating budget, as regulatory programs will drive budget increases in coming years. 2. Execution of wastewater and stormwater user fees as described in the rate change ordinances. 3. Execution of the Capital Improvement and Replacement Program as described in the January 2008 wastewater rate proposal. 4. Address litigation in the best interest of the St. Louis Community including environmental protection, safety and health, and economic realities. 5. Continue to seek improvements in collection of past due service charges. 6. Position the District to maintain institutional knowledge as staff transitions through personnel retirement. 1. Continued emphasis on employee and leadership development. 8. Manage funding needs to support the Districts Water Backup Insurance Program. 9. Continue community outreach and education initiatives to inform ratepayers about the St. Louis area's wastewater and stormwater infrastructure needs and the role that the community can take in ensuring a safe and healthy water environment. Department Directors and Managers begin budget development by providing an updated expenditure forecast for the remainder of FY2011. A two step, zero -based budgeting method is used to develop the FY2012 budget. This method requires written justification as to need and purpose for all expenditures. The first step is the preparation of a base budget that reflects the ongoing day -today operations of each Department. The second step is the preparation of an incremental budget, which reflects costs associated with initiatives outlined in the SBOP. Throughout the budget development process, Departmental Staff is required to evaluate programs and identify possible changes in senfices and Staff positions. The Department Directors forward their proposed base budgets to the Director of Finance for analysis. Cost benefit business cases to support incremental budgets are submitted to the Executive Director for review. The base budgets and requests for incremental funding are then compiled and further analyzed to ensure the preliminary budget meets the District's needs, priorities, goals and objectives without exceeding forecasted resources. Results toward FY 2011 performance measures and accomplishments are also provided for inclusion in the District budget documents. Any unresolved issues are presented to the Executive Director for a final decision. The recommended budget reductions and adjustments are then incorporated. Per Charter a preliminary budget is delivered to The Board for review by March 1511', A series of budget presentations are given to The Board's Finance Committee to allow for more in-depth review by the Trustees. The Board's recommended budget adjustments are then incorporated into a final budget document. A proposed financial plan and an Executive Summary of the Budget are communicated to the general public in the form of a public hearing. The public hearing is advertised in the newspapers at least three weeks before the scheduled hearing in order to allow sufficient time for the public to review and ask questions. The Board is then required to adopt the budget, tax and rate ordinances (if applicable) consistent with the District's Charter and State Law, 18 BUDGET PROCESS (continued) The District's fiscal year begins on July 1st, Departments are accountable for budgetary control throughout the fiscal year. Expenditure patterns are examined and compared to budget plans with variances reported. Written responses to significant variances are required quarterly from each Department and reviewed by the Director of Finance. Budget status is reported to The Board at its monthly Finance Committee meeting. The Director of Finance reviews the District's monthly financial statements and budget variance report ensuring the Distrids actual revenue is sufficient to support budgeted expenditures. Forecasted expenses are also compared to budget. The District has two methods by which the budget may be amended once it has been adopted by the Board of Trustees. The first is through a Budget Transfer. The District's operating budget is adopted at the Fund and Department level as detailed in the District's Budget Ordinance. Any transfers of appropriations between Departments or Funds require Board approval through the adoption of a Budget Transfer Resolution. Budget transfers are made on an as needed basis. The second method to amend the Budget is to submit a request for a Supplemental Appropriation. This request requires the introduction and adoption of a revised budget ordinance by the Board. This action would increase the total appropriations available in the Operating Budget. This method would only be used if it was determined that the total adopted budget would not be sufficient to cover the additional expenditures. Expenditures for the Capital Improvement and Replacement Program (CIRP) are presented on an appropriated basis as opposed to a ash flow basis. Govemmental accounting procedures require an adequate budget to payfor an entire contract to be available and appropriated in the period in which a contract is entered. All outstanding CIRP encumbrances remain open until a project is completed. A budget is developed for both revenues and expenses: 1. Revenue projections are developed from trend analysis, incorporating upcoming rate increases and significant economic and policy factors. • FY 2012 Total Revenues are budgeted at: Wastewater User Charges $224.1 Stormwater User Charges 1.3 Taxes 23.0 Revenue Bonds 40,0 Investment and Other Income 25,4 Use of Fund Balances 63.8 TOTAL REVENUE 377.6 2. Operating Expenses are developed using a zero based budgeting method with written justification for all expenditures. The CIRP is developed by the District's Engineering Department based on the revenues forecasted for the coming year. Projects prioritized for the coming year are outlined in a supplemental report in conjunction with the Operating Budget. Debt service for the District's existing and forecasted use of bonds is developed by the District's Treasury Department and also incorporated into the Operating Budget. • FY 2012 Operating Expense: Operations $178.3 CIRP 153,4 Debt Service 45.9 TOTAL EXPENSES 377.6 19 CALENDAR FOR FY 2012 BUDGET Distribute Budget Packet to Department Directors November 1, 2010 Return Department Budget Request to Budget Office November 30, 2010 Budget analyzed by Director of Finance and Budget Staff January 25, 2011 Draft Consolidated Budget to Executive Director March 4, 2011 Preliminary Budget, Budget Executive Summary, and CIRP available to Public for inspection and comment March 15, 2011 Operating Budget and CIRP Budget presentation to Board Finance Committee April 12, 2011 Publish Notice of Public Hearing on CIRP, Budget, Taxes and User Charges April 13, 2011 Public Hearing on CIRP, Budget, Taxes, Wastewater and Stormwater User Charges (7:00 P.M at 2350 Market St.) May 5, 2011 Introduce Budget and Tax Ordinances and Adopt CIRP Resolution (5:00 p.m. Board Meeting) May 12, 2011 Adopt Budget and Tax Ordinances (5:00 p.m. Board Meeting) June 9, 2011 20 Sources and Uses Where tbes the And Ale does money ca from? the mow go? Use of Fund Balance $63.8 16.9% Revenue Bonds $40.0 10.6% Investment and Other Income $25A 6.7% Taxes 623.0 6.1% TOTAL FY 2012 BUDGET $377,6 $s in millions Capital Improvement& Replacement Program 3153.4 40.6% Debt Service $45.9 12.2% Operations & Maintenance $178.3 47.2% 21 SOURCES OF FUNDING USER CHARGES The District has two types of user charges, a wastewater user charge and a stormier user charge. All user charge revenue is recorded in the associated Revenue Fund. A portion of the revenue is transferred to the General Fund to cover daily operating, maintenance and replacement costs; a portion is allocated to the Water Backup Insurance and Reimbursement Fund to provide assistance to homeowners with damages resulting from blocked main and basement backups, and a portion is allocated to the Debt Service Funds to retire outstanding bonds issued for capital improvements. The remainder of the revenue is transferred to the Capital Improvement and Replacement funds for construction projects and emergencies. A chart detailing the flow of funds is also included in the succeeding pages of the Budget Summary section. Wastewater: Residential customers with metered water service will pay a billing and collection charge, a system availability charge and a volume charge based on the most recent winter quarter's water usage. Unmetered customers will pay the same charges with the exception of a volume charge. Unmetered volume is based on housing attributes such as the number of rooms and plumbing fixtures. Non-residential customers will pay the same charges plus an additional compliance charge. Some non- residential customers will pay extra strength surcharges for The treatment of wastes containing suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand or chemical oxygen demand exceeding normal wastewater strengths. The Wastewater User Charge revenue for FY 2012 is estimated at $224,320,500. Stormwater: On March 1, 2008 the District changed its stormwater rate methodology from a flat rate basis to a stormwater impervious area based user charge. This stormwater user charge applied to all single family, multi -family and commercial accounts. The previous stormwater rate methodology did not provide sufficient funding for rehabilitation and preventative maintenance of the stormwater infrastructure within the District's boundaries. However the impervious methodology was challenged in court by a group of citizens and in July 2010 deemed unconstitutional. Therefore the MSD Board of Trustees determined that until final resolution of the court case MSD's method of funding stormwater services will revert back to the inclusion of a fiat per month stormwater service charge on each customer's bill. The estimated stormwater revenue for FY 2012 is $1,358,765. Other User Charges; Other User Charge revenue such as Late Fees, Lien Interest, Refunds and Account Adjustments are estimated to be ($270,815). This amount is net of stormwater charge credits resulting from the District's stormwater customer appeal process and a provision to recognized delinquent customer bills. Total User Charges: The District's total FY 2012 User Charge revenue is estimated to be $225,408,450. 22 The District also provides a low income assistance program. Those customers who are eligible will receive a low income credit equal to 50% of their sewer service charge bill. A composite schedule of the budgeted Wastewater and Stormwater user charge revenue by customer class can be found in the succeeding pages of the Summary Section. More detailed schedules can be found in the Revenue Funds section. REVENUE BONDS The District will issue approximately $40 million in bonds in FY 2012 to be used for capital improvement projects Prior to a November 2000 Charter change, the Districtwas unable to issue revenue bonds as a source of funding its Capital Improvement and Replacement Program (CIRP). Almost all of the District's capital expenditures were funded from annual cash flow, known as Pay -As - You -Go (PAYGO) funding. Continuation of a PAYGO approach as the District's sole funding option would have required significant rate increases to generate the necessary annual capital funding. PAYGO is the lowest cost funding source due to it's avoidance of the financing and interest costs associated with long term debt. The primary negatives associated with PAYGO funding include 1) The short- term impact on customer rates, and 2) The mismatch between the cost and benefit of the District's capital infrastructure to the users. In the case of capital projects that have a long fife expectancy, PAYGO funding causes today's customers to pay for an asset that will be used by tomorrow's customers for many years. Financing a portion of the capital program with bonds is an excellent way to distribute the cost of long-term assets to the future customers who will benefit from the use of the assets and lessen the impact of short-term rate increases. It is typically considered good public policy to allocate a portion of the cost of long-term assets to future users by the use of debt. At the same time, prudent fiscal policy would not allow 100% debt financing. The goal is to strike the correct balance between the distribution of the cost of long-term assets to the users that benefit from them and maintaining healthy financial ratios. AD VALOREM TAXES In July2010 a court ruling invalidated the District's impervious area based stormwater rate implemented in 2008. This ruling resuked in the reinstatement of a previous system of flat charges and property tax districts to pay for stormwater services. During FY 2012 all taxpayers within the District's boundaries will be assessed a $0.02 (two cents) per $100 of assessed valuation tax levy to pay primarily for stormwater services required by State and federal regulations. All taxpayers wrthinthe District's original boundaries will be assessed a $0.05 (five cents) per $100 of assessed valuation tax levy to pay for the District's stormwater operation and maintenance costs. This tax revenue is recorded in the General Fund of the District. Property tax rates will also be assessed for twelve (12) taxing subdistricts within the District's boundaries. All subdistrict taxes collected within these boundaries are held in the Operation, Maintenance and Construction Improvement (OMCI) fund balances and must be used primarily for stormwater capital improvements within the specific subdistrict boundaries in which the taxes are collected. 23 INVESTMENT INCOME & OTHER Investment Income and Other Fees will fund $25.3 million of the Budget. An investment return of 0.75% is assumed on all beginning fund balances. $2.8 million is expected to be generated from connection fees that are based on a flat rate per connection to the sanitary system. These revenue estimates are based on previous experience, current economic conditions and anticipated new home construction. Rental income from tenants at the 2350 Market building is expected to generate $264,000. Miscellaneous Income comprised of refunds of court costs and attomey fees is estimated at $2,503,000. GRANT INCOME Anticipated Grants will fund $94,000 of the FY 2012 Budget. All grant amounts are based on commitments made by the Federal, State, and Local governments. Stormwater projects include State grants from the State stormwater program, which are limited to one third of a project's eligible cost. Also included are Local grants for one third of a project's cost from municipalities that have made commitments. In the past, large Federal grants were available to help defray the cost of major clean water projects. Currently, however, the Federal govemment has decided to leave the funding of these projects to the local users of the system. The District will continue to aggressively pursue all possible grant opportunities. FUND BALANCES These sources of funding will result in a fund balance decrease of $63.8 million during FY 2012. 24 $23.0 6.1 % Sources of Funding Fiscal Year 2012 $63.8 16.9°% $s in millions $25.4 6.7% WW User Charges SW User Charges Revenue Bonds Investment Income & Other Fund Balances Taxes Total Revenues $377.6 $1.3 .3% 10.6% In FY 2012, User Charges will be the largest single source of revenue to the District. 25 Sources of Funding Fiscal Year 1012 (in million $) Capital Operations Debt Improvement & TOTAL Service Replacement Program Wastewater User Charges Stormwater User Charges Revenue Bonds Taxes Investment Income & Other Anticipated Grants Fund Balances TOTAL $139,6 (0,1) 0,0 14.4 21,7 0.0 0.8 $176.4 $44.2 0.0 0,0 0,0 1,9 0,0 (0,2) $45,9 $40.3 1.4 40,0 8.6 1,7 0.1 63,2 $155,3 $224,1 1.3 40,0 23,0 25,3 0,1 63,8 $377,6 Includes 818,3 million of Interfund Revenue for Stormwater services, see page 41 for details. 20 User Charges Fiscal Year 2012 $REVENUES 5148,542,902 67% Residential I Non.Residential Total Revenue $220,664,372 # of CUSTOMERS — Residential Non -Residential Total Customers 427,137 This chart shows the distribution of revenues billed and customers between residential and non-residential. The smallest class of customer (non-residential' contributes a proportionately greater amount of the user charge revenues. 27 MSD FLOW OF USER CHARGE FUNDS The use of separate funds for wastewater and stormwater revenue reflects MSD's two separate and distinct self-supporting services: wastewater service and stormwater service. In order to recover the cost of providing these services in a fair and equitable manner, there are two distinct pricing methods. The wastewater service charge is based on the volume and strength of wastewater discharged into the sewer. The stormwater service charge is a flat rate for all accounts. Wastewater User Charges are recorded in the Wastewater Revenue Fund. Stormwater User Charges are recorded in the Stormwater Revenue Fund. The details of the Wastewater revenue and the Stormwater revenue can be found in the revenue section of this document. From each of these revenues funds, a portion of the funds is transferred to other function -specific funds. The Stormwater Revenue Fund is divided between the Stormwater Emergency Fund and the District -wide Stormwater Fund. From the Wastewater Revenue Fund, the largest amount is allocated to the General Fund for the operation and maintenance of existing facilities and transferred to the corresponding Replacement Fund for the replacement of existing facilities. Smaller amounts are transferred to the Wastewater Emergency Fund to cover the cost of emergency work that may occur during this fiscal year, the Water Backup Insurance & Reimbursement Fund to cover the cost of water backup insurance and reimbursement and the Debt Service Fund to cover the cost of principal and interest on revenue bonds. The overall budget for the General Fund, whose resources are only partially made up of the sewer service charge allocation from the revenue fund, can be found in the General Fund section. The proposed budget for the Sanitary Replacement Fund can be found in the Construction Funds section. The revenue derived from the applicable user charge is listed as an Interfund Transfer in the column labeled BUDGET FY 2012. The pages immediately following the table show the projects currently planmed for that fund. The proposed budget for the District -wide Stormwater Fund can be found in the OMCI section. The revenue transferred from the Stormwater Revenue Fund is listed as an Interfund Transfer in the column labeled BUDGET FY 2012 The proposed budget for the Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Fund can be found in the Debt Service Funds section. The revenue transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund is listed as an Interfund Transfer in the column labeled BUDGET FY 2012. The proposed budget for the Water Backup Insurance and Reimbursement Fund can be found in the Special Funds section. The revenue transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund is listed as an Interfund Transfer in the column labeled BUDGET FY 2012. The budget for the Wastewater and Stormwater Emergency Funds can be found in the Special Funds section. The revenues transferred from the Wastewater and Stormwater Revenue Funds are listed as Interfund Transfers in the column labeled BUDGET FY 2012. 28 Please refer to the following chart that graphically depicts the MSD flow of funds. MSD Flow of User Charges Wastewater Revenue Fund $224,321,000 $1,000,000 IMPROVEMENT FUND $ 250,000 WASTEWATER EMERGENCY FUND $1,000,000 WATER BACK-UP INSUR, & REIMB. FUND $39,000,000 SANITARY REPLACEMENT FUND $44,159,000 DEBT SERVICE FUND $250,000 STORMWATER EMERGENCY FUND GENERAL FUND $138,912,000 Stormwater Revenue Fund $1,359,000 / $1,109,000 \ DISTRICTWIDE STORMWATER FUND 29 MONTHLY USER CHARGE STRUCTURE A cost of service model is used to project revenues and revenue requirements for five fiscal years, recognizing anticipated growth in number of customers and increased wastewater flows throughout the service area. The study of revenue requirements recognizes projected operation and maintenance expense, capital improvement requirements met from revenues, principal and interest payments on current and proposed revenue bond issues, and recommended reserve fund requirements. Allocated costs of service are developed for each class of customer and type of service based on considerations of utility revenue needs and projected customer service requirements. User charge rate adjustments are designed for customers in accordance with allocated costs of service and local policy and practical considerations. WASTEWATER USER CHARGERATESIMon90N1 Unmetered Billing, Collection 8 System Availability Charge Per Roan Per Water Closet Per Bath Per Separate Shower FY2012 FY2011 FY2010 FY2009 FY200800 FY2008 FY2007 $11.85 $11.40 $10.90 $10.70 S10.70 $7.90 $7.90 1.38 1.32 1.25 123 1.23 1.18 1.18 5.15 4.93 4.69 4.59 4.59 4.42 4.42 4.30 4.11 3.91 3.83 3.83 3.69 3.69 4.30 4.11 3.91 3.83 3.83 3.69 3.69 Metered Billing, Collection &System Availability Charge Residential $11.85 Non -Residential 11.85 Volume Charge- $1100 Cubic Ft Residential Non -Residential Compliance Charge Nan -Residential $11.40 $10.90 $10.70 $10.70 $7.90 57X 11.40 10.90 10.70 10.70 7.90 7X 5211 $2.02 $1.92 $1.88 $1.88 $131 $1.81 211 202 1.92 1. 1.88 1.81 1.81 $31.95 $30.85 $29.65 $27.40 $27.40 $12.55 51255 Esta Strength Surcharge -$lion Suspended Solids over 300ppm $231.35 $222.62 $218.90 $218.90 $218.90 $218.90 $218.90 BOO over 300 ppm 620.14 596.72 551.52 529X 529.90 461.44 461.44 COD over 600ppm 310.07 298.36 275.76 264.95 264.95 230.72 230.72 STORMWATER USER CHARGE RATES (Monthly( Per Single Family or Commercial Account/Per Month $0.24 $0.24 $0.24 $0.24 $0.24 Per Unit of Multiunit Residential AccounFer Month S0.18 $0.18 Per 100 sq. ft Impervious Area Impervious based sbormwatercharge implemented 311108 and halted 811110. July -December $0.14 $0.12 $0.12 January -June 0.14 0.14 0 Wastewater ate increase effective January 1. 2008, all others effective July 1. Residential Wastewater User Charge St, Louis and Other Municipalities Monthly Average for a Typical Single Family Residence Based on 10 Ccfs $60.00 552.55 S4 55031 $50.00 ®c 9 S45.41 0 Memo -/ $30.00 $20.00 $10.00 moo ee oAz. sae 0"e 0�r pe � 1 e(,d" �' ge epc `e� G. 541.82 537.00 0 9 523.0 0 520.07 Source: MLGW 2010 Utility Bill Comparisons report 30 ANNUAL USER CHARGE STRUCTURE 2011- 2010- 2009- 2008- 2007- 2007- 2006- Ten Largest Customers' User Charges 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 0 2008 0 2007 0 For the Year Ended June 30, 2011 WASTEWATER USER CHARGE RATES (Annual)- - - - -_ Percent of Total User Unmetered Custr^er User Charge Charges Billing, Collection & System Availability Charge $142.20 $13520 $130.80 $128.40 $128.40 $94.80 S94.80 InBevAnheuser-Busch $4.935,239 224% Per Room 16.56 15.84 15.00 14.76 14.76 14.16 14.16 Per Water Closet 51.80 59.16 5628 55.08 55.08 53.04 53.04 Washington University 1268,801 0.57% Per Bath 51.60 49.32 46.92 45.96 45.96 4428 4428 Per Separate Shower 51.60 49.32 46.92 45.96 45.96 4428 4428 Mallinckrodtloc 1,048,204 0.48% Metered Cott Beverages Inc 805,108 0.36% Billing, Collection & System Availabl4y Charge Residential 14220 136.80 130,80 128.40 128.40 94.80 94.80 City of St Louis -Parks 787548 0.36% Non42esidential 14220 136.80 130.80 128.40 128.40 94.80 94.80 Zoological Gardens 710,365 0.32% Volume Charge -$1100 Cubic Ft Residential 2.11 2.02 192 1.88 1.88 1.81 1.81 Sigma -Aldrich 595,897 0.27% Non -Residential 211 2.02 1.92 1.813 1.88 1.81 1.81 Boeing Co 593991 027% Monitoring Charge Non -Residential 383.40 37020 35580 328.80 328.80 150.60 150.60 BJC Health System 481,937 022% Extra StrengthSuctharge - Won SensienlColors Inc 474099 021% Suspended Solids over 300 ppm 231.35 22262 21890 218.90 218.90 218.90 218.90 BOD over 300 ppm 620.14 596.72 551.52 529.90 529.90 451.44 461M $11.701182 LEN COD over 600ppm 310.07 298.36 275.76 264.95 264.95 230.72 230.72 STORMWATER SERVICE CHARGE (Annual) Per Single Family1CommeraalAccount 2,88 288 0.00 0.00 1.92 288 2.88 Per Unit o)Multi-UnitResidential Account 216funl 2.16Amit Sf100 sq, fL impervious area 0.00 © 42.00 39.00 © 12.00 0.00 0.00 0 Wastewater User Charges typically established in July each year. Only exception was Wastewater User Charge increase effective January 2008. 0 Rates ineffect through December 2007 0 Rates established in January 2008 Impervious -based storm service charge established in March 2008 at a rate of $.12 per 100 squarefeel $12.00 represents March through June 2008 © Annual amount based on average of 2500 square feet per account $39.00 represents 6 months atS.12 rate and 6 months atS.14 rate. © Court overruled impervious based storm service charge in August 2010; reverted to fiat -rate storm service charge. 31 Projected User Charge Revenue COMPOSITE FY 2012 BUDGET WASTEWATER USER CHARGE Metered Single Family Unmetered Single Family Metered Multi -Family Unmetered Multi -Family Non -Residential Extra Strength Surcharges Less: Low Income Assistance Credits Subtotal WASTEWATER USER CHARGE STORMWATER USER CHARGE Single Family Multi -Family Non -Residential Less: Low Income Assistance Credits Less: Levee District Credits Subtotal STORMWATER USER CHARGE USER CHARGE REVENUE Bad Debt Prov., Adjustments, Late Charges & Refunds TOTAL USER CHARGE REVENUE $ 94,683,400 22,671,600 21,753,100 12,045,200 66,515,800 7,055,100 (403,700) $ 224,320,500 99.4°% $ 1,037,500 253,100 71,700 (3,535) 0 $ 1,358,765 0.6% $ 225,679,265 100.0% $ (270,815) $ (270,815) $ 225,408,450 32 Proposed Expenditures Fiscal Year 2012 Operations $178.3 Debt Service 45,9 Capital Improvement & Replacement Program (CIRP) 153.4 TOTAL $377.6 Note: Operations includes: General Fund, Water Backup Insurance & Reimbursement Fund and Stormwater Operation & Maintenance of OMCI funds. $s in millions Operations Debt 47.2% Service \ 12.2% CIRP 40.6% 33 Outstanding Revenue Bonds & Estimated Debt Capacity Calculation of Estimated Debt Capacity: Based on the observation that the "AA" and "A" rated issuers cap out at about $1,400 of debt per capita. MSD's Co -Financial Advisors recommend targeting $1,385 as a cap on debt per capita. This is at the high end of the range for "A" rated issuers, but is acceptable due to the traditionally low debt levels in the overlapping jurisdictions in Missouri. January 1, 2000 Census - District population Less: adjustment for urban sprawl 1,400,000 (100,000) 1,300,000 Debt Capacity per MSD Co -Financial Advisors Per capita: $1,385 Total Debt Capacity $1,800,000,000 Revenue Bond Indebtedness* $775,000,000 ESTIMATED Remaining Debt Capacity $1.025,000,000 Percent of Debt Capacity Remaining yd°/s $600.00 $550.00 $500.00 $450.00 $400.00 $350.00 $300.00 $250.00 $200.00 $150.00 $100.00 $50.00 $0.00 Current Debt Per Capita Proposed *Note: The District's current debt limit is $775,000,000 as aproved by voters on August 5, 2008. Debt Service Capacity Fiscal Year 2012 The chart above shows that MSD could issue an additional $1,025.0 million of revenue bonds before reaching the debt limit. In FY 2012 the District plans to issue the remaining $40 million of revenue bonds. 34 Outstanding Revenue Bonds and Estimated Debt Capacity Review and analysis of the District's debt position is necessary to provide a capital financing plan for infrastructure improvements. District needs, available resources and impacts on user charge rates drive the District's debt issuance program. Long-term projected financing is linked with economic, demographic and financial resources expected to be available to repay the debt At elections held on February 3, 2004, and August 5, 2008, voters within the District approved the total issuance by the District of $775,000,000 in sewer system revenue bonds to enable the District to comply with federal and state clean water requirements. The District may use the proceeds of such revenue bonds for the purpose of constructing, repairing, replacing and equipping new and existing District wastewater facilities. The table below summarizes the Districts outstanding debt. BOND/NOTES ORIGINAL ANAL AMOUNT OF ISSUE PAYMENT INTEREST ISSUE DATE DATE RATE BEGINNING OUTSTANDING BALANCE INTEREST PRINCIPAL 07101111 PAYABLE PAYABLE TOTAL Revenue Bonds: Series 2004A Series 2004B Series 2005A Series 2006A Series 20068 Series 2006C Series 2008A Series 20086 Series 2009A Series 2010A Series 2010E Series2011A Subtotal $175,000,000 161,280,000 6,800,000 42,715,000 14,205,000 60,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 23,000,000, 7,980,700 85,000,000 89,000,000 $ 734,980,700 2012 New Debt $ 40,000,000 Total Revenue Bonds $ 775,000,000 Notes: Energy loan Subtotal TOTAL DEBT 512004 51112034 512004 11112027 512005 71112025 512006 71112026 1112006 71112027 1112006 51112036 1112008 51112038 1012008 11112029 12/2009 11112030 1212009 71112031 112010 51112039 98,595 412004 $ 98,595 $ 775,098,595 2.00%-5.00% $ 2.00%-5.25% 3.00%-5.00% 3.60% • 5.25% 4.00%-5.00% 4.125%-5.00% 5.10%- 5.75% 2.01%-4,41% 1.46% 1.77% 5.86°% 165,590,000 123,055,000 5,370,000 36,335,000 12,285,000 60,000,000 30,000,000 35,622,500 22,529,300 7,980,700 85,000,000 89,000,000 672,767,500 $ 7,920,384 6,398,858 260,325 1,708,701 557,113 2,902,000 1,632,435 1,820,195 325,452 116,871 4,977,600 2,187,458 $ 30,807,392 $ 1,960,000 7,095,000 315,000 2,110,000 665,000 1,770,000 957,700 $15,608,700 40,000,000 $ 520,000 $ 795,676 712,767,500 $ 31,327,392 $16,404,376 9,880,384 13,493,858 575,325 3,818,701 1,222,113 2,902,000 1,632,435 3,590,195 1,283,152 116,871 4,977,600 2,923,458 46,416.092 $ 1,315,676 $ 47,731,768 2013 3.15% 25,251 703 11,783 12,486 25,251 $ 703 $ 11,783 $ 12,486 $ 712,792,751 $ 31,328,095 $16,416,159 $ 47,744,254 District -Wide Operating Expense by Natural Account Group Fiscal Year 2012 $s in millions $14.4 $12.4 9.0% 7.7% Total Expenses $160.1 Personnel Services Supplies Utilities Contractual Services Capital Outlay The Water Back Up Insurance & Reimbursement Fund is included in the Contractual Service category. 36 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District ALLOCATED POSITIONS DEPARTMENT FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Secretary -Treasurer 7 7 6 Executive Director 4 4 4 General Counsel 7 7 7 Human Resources 25 25 24 Finance 70 70 64 Information Systems 42 42 39 Engineering 234 234 229 Operations 589 592 563 Total Available Positions 978 981 936 Budgeted FY 2012 7 4 7 27 63 43 229 564 944 INCREASE] (DECREASE) EXPLANATION 1 Added back Intemal Auditor 0 Position count remains the same as previous year 0 Position count remains the same as previous year 3 Added 2 Payroll positions and 1 Generalist position (1) Transferred 2 Payroll positions to HR, added 1 Assistant Buyer position 4 Added 4 Business Analyst positions 0 Position count remains the same as previous year 1 Added 1 Maintenance Technician 8 Total positions added (eliminated) 37 REVENUE TRENDS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE ($ 000) 225,000 175,000 125,000 $75,000 $25,000 $25,000) 575,000) :i j :;. ii II I- 1 1 1 in In n Wastewater User Charges Stormwater User Charges Revenue Bonds Taxes Grant Income Interest, Fees, Misc. Stormwater Interfund Revenue Change in Fund Balance This analysis of MSD's revenues compares actual revenues received in 2009 and 2010, a forecast for 2011, budget for 2012, and projections for the years 2013 and 2014. The Distnct's last wastewater rate increase was implemented July 1, 2010, with annual rate increases on average of approximately 4% continuing for the next two years. A new stormwater impervious rate structure was implemented March 1, 2008, but ruled invalid in August 2010. With the implementation of the impervious rate, all ad valorem tax rates were reduced to zero but were reinstated when the impervious based billing was suspended in August 2010. For FY 2012 it is anticipated that the last $40 million of voter approved Revenue Bonds will be issued to continue funding the Multi -decade Capital Improvement and Replacement Program. With the downturn in the investment markets and the general slowdown in residential and commercial construction, the Revenue Category: Interest. Fees and Misc has been reduced by 42% far Budget FY 2012 vs. Forecast FY 2011. This trend will be reviewed as future years' actual results are posted. During FY 2011, the District established a Stormwater Interfund Revenue category to report operation and maintenance expense incurred in OMCI funds that purchase General Fund resources. FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN TOTAL FUND BALANCE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 202,717 $ 173,036 $ 202,720 $ 201,330 $ 179,254 $ 115,409 $ 112,862 Revenues: Revenue Bonds $ 77,983 $ 121,048 $ 89,000 $ 89,000 $ 40,000 $ 0 $ 0 Capital Improvement Surcharge Refund 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Interfund Revenue 0 0 18,265 18,265 18,265 18,448 18,816 Wastewater User Charges 205,179 200,083 213,599 213,554 224,118 224,118 224,118 Stormwater User Charges 39,519 41,636 4,830 6,011 1,291 1,291 1,291 Taxes 2,129 1,400 26,461 25,667 23,002 23,232 23,700 Interest on Investments 14,235 7,332 1,900 6,118 1,461 1,051 1,041 Grant Income 502 95 3 0 94 955 0 Connection and Other Fees 3,475 3,085 3,084 3,117 2,802 2,903 3,000 Proceeds from Sale of Property 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rental Income 211 264 264 265 264 272 280 Miscellaneous 1,706 5,758 310 2,633 2,503 2,541 2579 Total Revenues $ 344,943 $ 380,702 $ 357,717 $ 364,630 $ 313,800 $ 274,811$ 274,825 Expenditures: Personnel Services $ 79,004 $ 85,025 $ 85,485 $ 86,677 $ 89,710 $ 91,334 $ 94,276 Supplies 11,881 13,298 12,057 12,175 12,428 12,740 13,275 Utilities 12,550 12,355 14,280 14,164 14,440 15,120 16,404 Contractual Services 42,416 37,644 44,958 43,367 40,268 40,391 41,498 Capital Outlay 4,756 3,020 3,116 2,883 3,267 3,332 3,432 StormwaterO&M Expense 0 0 18,265 18,265 18,265 18,448 18,816 Construction and Engineering 198,083 164,481 132,996 166,156 153,390 47,829 36,636 Principal Payments 12,164 16,178 17,053 17,023 19,404 21,785 19,334 Interest Payments 17,510 19,851 25,164 25,941 26,422 26,328 25,864 Other (3,739) 558 50 50 50 50 50 Total Expenditures $ 374,625 $ 352,410 $ 353,425 $ 386,701 $ 377,645 $ 277,357 $ 269,585 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (29,682) $ 28,292 $ 4,293 $ (22,071) $ (63,845) $ (2,546) $ 5,240 0 & M Allocation from Other Funds 158,429 138,499 128,330 129,129 138,912 135,125 143,540 0 & M Allocation to General Fund (158,429) (138,499) (128,330) (129,129) (138,912) (135,125) (143,540) Interfund Transfers $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ (0) Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (29,682) $ 28,292 $ 4.293 $ (22,071) $ (63,845) $ (2.546) $ 5,240 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 173,036 $ 201,330 $ 207,012 $ 179,256 $ 115,409 $ 112,862 $ 118.102 'See individual fund sections for details on previous, current and future years' budgets. 39 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN INDIVIDUAL FUND BALANCES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR FY 2012 BUDGET ($ 000) OPER. MAINT.B DEBT GENERAL REVENUE CONST.IMPR. CONSTRUCTION SERVICE SPECIAL WBU FY2012 FUND FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUND TOTAL FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 16,463 $ 0 $ 44,830 $ 66,255 $ 35,488 $ 7,067 $ 9,151$ 179,254 Revenues: Wastewater User Charges $ (203) $ 224,321 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 224.118 Stormwater User Charges (68) 1,359 0 0 0 0 0 1,291 Stormwater Interfund Revenue 18,265 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,265 Revenue Bonds 0 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 Taxes 14,370 0 8,632 0 0 0 0 23,002 Interest on Investments 100 0 472 497 266 57 69 1,461 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 94 Connection and Other Fees 2,152 0 0 0 0 650 0 2,802 Rental Income 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 264 Miscellaneous 830 0 0 0 1,668 5 0 2,503 Total Revenues $ 35,710 $ 225,680 $ 9,104 $ 40,497 $ 1,934 $ 806 $ 69 $ 313,800 Expenditures: Personnel Services $ 89,710 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 89,710 Supplies 12,428 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,428 Utilities 14,440 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,440 Contractual Services 36,768 0 0 0 0 0 3,500 40,268 CapitalOutiay 3,267 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,267 Stormwater 0&M Expense 0 0 18,265 0 0 0 0 18,265 Construction and Engineering 0 0 10,355 140,771 0 2,264 0 153,390 Prindpal Payments 0 0 0 0 19,404 0 0 19,404 Interest Payments 0 0 0 0 26,422 0 0 26,422 Other 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 50 Total Expenditures $ 156,613 $ 0 $ 28,620 $ 140,771 $ 45,877 $ 2,264 $ 3,500 $ 377,645 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (120,903) $ 225.680 $ (19,516) $ (100,274) $ (43,942) $ (1,458) $ (3,431) $ (63,845) 0& M Allocation from Other Funds 138,912 0 0 0 0 0 0 138,912 0& M Alloation to General Fund 0 (138.912) 0 0 0 0 0 (138,912) Interfund Transfers $ (16,371) $ (86,768) $ 17,480 $ 39,000 $ 44,159 $ 1,500 $ 1,000 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal' $ 1,637 $ 0 $ (2,036) $ (61,274) $ 216 $ 42 $ (2,431) $ (63,845) FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 18,100 $ 0 $ 42,794 $ 4,981 $ 35,705 $ 7,109 $ 6,720 $ 115,409 'Note: Construction fund balances decreased an expected 92%. FY12 is the final year of the current rate cyde and the remaining fund balance is partially funding the projects for this cycle. The Water Backup fund's 26%decrease is attributed to the successful 0&M cleaning program that keeps pipes free of obstructions reducing backups and the demand on this fund. 40 The reduction in demand eliminates the need to maintain a large fund balance, and the District has reduced funding to bring the ending fund balance to a more meaningful level. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Segmentation Reconciliation FY 2012 BUDGET Operating Budget Stormwater Budget Total Stormwater Total Total General Water Improvement Wastewater Stormwater Debt Sanitary Wastewater OMCI Dislrictwide Maintenance Stormwater District Fund Backup Fund Emergency Emergency Funds Replacement Budget Funds Stormwaler &Operations Budget Budget Beginning Fund Balance $ 16,463 $ 9,151 5 1,282 $ 5,535 $ 250 $ 35,488 $ 66,255 $ 134,424 $ 40,737 $ 1,080 $ 3,013 $ 44,830 $ 179,254 Revenues: WW User Charges S 138.709 S 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 250 S 44,159 S 39,000 $ 224,118 $ • $ 224,118 SW User Charges (68) 250 182 1,109 1,109 1,291 Taxes - 8,632 5,461 8,910 23,003 23,003 Interfund Revenue 18,265 18,265 18,265 Bonds 40,000 40,060 40,000 Other 3.346 69 762 42 2 1,934 497 6,652 431 11 30 472 7,124 Interfund Transfer (2.000) (2,000) 2,000 2,000 Total Revenues $ 158,252 $ 1,069 $ 1,762 $ 292 $ 252 $ 46,093 $ 79,497 $ 287,217 $ 9,063 $ 8,581 $ 8,940 $ 26,584 $ 313,800 Expenses: Personnel Services S 89,710 Supplies 12,428 Utilities 14,440 Contractual Services 36,768 3.500 Capital 3,267 SW Expense Construction Principal & Interest 1,764 250 250 45,877 $ 89,710 12,428 14,440 40,268 3,267 140,771 143,035 45,877 $ • $ 89,710 12,428 14,440 40,268 3,267 3,895 8.249 6,121 18,265 18,265 10,355 10,355 153,390 • 45,877 Total Expenses $ 156,613 $ 3,500 $ 1,764 $ 250 $ 250 $ 45,877 $ 140,771 $ 349,025 $ 14,250 $ 8,249 $ 6,121 $ 28,620 $ 377,645 Fund Increasel(Decrease) $ 1,637 $ (2,431) $ (2) S 42 S 2 $ 216 $ (61,274) $ (61,808) $ (5,187) $ 332 $ 2,819 $ (2,036) $ (63,845) Ending Fund Balance $ 18,100 $ 6,720 $ 1,280 $ 5,577 $ 252 $ 35,704 $ 4,981 $ 72,616 $ 35,550 $ 1,412 $ 5,832 $ 42,794 $ 115,409 Note: The arrows represent the use of interfund transactions between the Wastewater Budget and the Stormwater Budget for the implementation of the Stormwater Program. 41 Beginning Fund Balance Revenues: WW User Charges SW User Charges Taxes Intedund Revenue Bands Other Intedund Transfer Expenses: Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Segmentation Reconciliation FY 2013 BUDGET Operating Budget General Water Improvement Wastewater Stormwater Fund Backup Fund Emergency Emergency $ 18,100 $ 6,720 $ 1,280 S 5,577 $ 252 Debt Funds Stormwater Budget Total Stormwaler Total Sanitary Wastewater OMCI Oistrictwide Maintenance Stomnvater Replacement Budget Funds Stormwater & Operations Budget Total District Budget $ 35,704 S 4,981 $ 72,616 $ 35,550 $ 1,412 $ 5,832 $ 42,794 $ 115,409 S 134,922 $ 3,000 $ 1,500 S 250 S 46,445 $ 38,000 $ 224,117 (68) 18,448 250 182 18,448 3.494 50 672 56 3 2,025 992 7,292 $ • $ 224,117 1,109 1,109 1,291 8,718 5,516 8,999 23,233 23,233 18,448 • 357 14 58 429 7,721 Total Revenues $ 156,796 $ 3,050 $ 2,172 $ 306 $ 253 $ 48,470 $ 38,992 $ 250,039 S 9,075 $ Personnel Services Supplies Utilities Contractual Services Capital SW Expense Construction Principal & Interest S 91.334 12,740 15,120 36,891 3,500 3,332 2.520 250 250 48,163 S 91,334 12,740 15,120 40,391 3,332 40,000 43,020 48,163 6,639 $ 9,057 $ 24,771 $ 274,810 S • $ 91,334 12,740 15,120 40,391 3,332 3,935 7,831 6,682 18,448 18,448 4,809 4,809 47,829 49,163 Total Expenses $ 159,417 $ 3,500 $ 2,520 $ Fund Increase/(Decrease) $ (2,621) $ (450) $ (348) $ 250 $ 250 $ 48,163 $ 56 $ 3 $ 307 $ 40,000 $ 254,100 $ 8,744 $ 7,831 $ 6,682 $ 23,257 $ 277,357 (1,008) $ (4,061) $ 331 $ (1,192) $ 2,375 $ 1,514 $ (2,547) Ending Fund Balance $ 15,479 $ 6,270 $ 932 $ 5,633 S 255 $ 36,011 $ 3,973 $ 68,555 $ 35,881 $ 220 $ 8,207 $ 44,308 $ 112,862 Note: The arrows represent the use of interfund transactions between the Wastewater Budget and the Stormwater Budget for the implementation of the 5lormwater Program. 42 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Segmentation Reconciliation FY 2014 BUDGET Operating Budget Stormwater Budget Total Stormwater Total Total General Water Improvement Wastewater Stormwater Debt Sanitary Wastewater OMCI Disfrictwide Maintenance Stormwater District Fund Backup Fund Emergency Emergency Funds Replacement Budget Funds Stormwater &Operations Budget Budget Beginning Fund Balance $ 15,479 $ 6,270 $ 932 S 5,633 $ 255 $ 36,011 $ 3,973 $ 68,555 $ 35,881 $ 220 $ 8,207 $ 44,308 S 112,862 Revenues: WN9 User Charges SW User Charges Taxes Interfund Revenue Bonds Other Interfund Transfer Expenses: $ 143,338 $ 3,000 $ 2:000 $ 250 S 43,530 $ 32,000 $ 224,118 $ • $ 224,118 (68) 250 182 1,109 1,109 1,291 8,896 5,626 9,179 23,701 23,701 18,816 18,816 18,816 3,622 47 669 56 3 2,028 30 6,455 360 2 82 444 6,899 Total Revenues $ 165,708 $ 3,047 $ 2.669 $ 306 $ 253 $ 45,558 $ 32,030 S 249,571 $ 9,256 $ 737 $ 9,261 $ 25,254 $ 274,824 Personnel Services Supplies Utilities Contractual Services Capital SW Expense Construction Principal & Interest $ 94,276 13,275 16,404 37,998 3,500 3,432 3,136 250 250 45,248 32,000 $ 94,276 13,275 16,404 41,498 3,432 • 35,636 45,248 $ • $ 94,276 13,275 16,404 41,498 3,432 4,012 6,748 8,056 18,816 18,816 1,000 1,000 36,636 45,248 Total Expenses $ 165,385 $ 3,500 $ 3,136 $ 250 $ 250 $ 45,248 $ 32,000 $ 249,769 $ 5,012 $ 6,748 $ 8,056 $ 19,816 $ 269,585 Fund Increase/(Decrease) S 323 $ (453) $ (467) $ 56 $ 3 $ 310 $ 30 $ (198) $ 4,244 $ (11) $ 1,205 $ 5,438 $ 5,239 Ending Fund Balance $ 15,802 $ 5,817 $ 465 $ 5,689 $ 258 $ 36,321 $ 4,003 $ 68,357 $ 40,125 $ 209 $ 9,412 $ 49,746 $ 118,101 Note: The arrows represent the use of intedund transactions between the Wastewater Budget and the Stormwater Budget for the implementation of the Stormwater Program. 43 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2012 LIST OF FUNDS* Fund No. Fund Name Fund No. Fund Name 1101 General Fund Board of Trustees Rate Commission Civil Service Commission Secretary - Treasurer Executive Director General Counsel Human Resources Finance Information Systems Engineering Operations Special Funds 4102 Improvement 4104 Water Back-up Insurance & Reimbursement 4122 Wastewater Emergency Fund 4123 Stormwater Emergency Fund Debt Funds 2205 Mississippi River Prin. & Int. 2804 Wastewater Revenue Bond Service 2808 Wastewater Revenue Bond Service 2810 Wastewater Revenue Bond Service 2812 Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Revenue Funds 3306 Wastewater Revenue 3307 Stormwater Revenue Construction Funds 6610 Caulks Creek Const. Fund 6620 Williams Creek Const. Fund 6650 Clean Water Capital Improve. Trust 6660 Sanitary Replacement Operation, Maintenance and Construction Improvement Funds 5110 District Wide Stormwater Fund 5130 Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Fund 5563 Clayton -Central OMCI 5564 Coldwater Crk. OMCI 5565 Creve Coeur-Frontenac OMCI 5566 Deer Creek OMCI 5569 Fountain Creek OMCI 5571 Gravois Creek OMCI 5574 Loretta -Joplin OMCI 5576 Maline Creek OMCI 5579 North Affton OMCI 5580 North Kinloch OMCI 5583 Sugar Creek OMCI 5584 University City OMCI 5587 Watkins Creek OMCI 5589 Wellston OMCI 5590 MO. River Bonfils Subd. #448 5591 Lower Meramec River Basin Subd. #499 5592 Shrewsbury Br. of RDP Subd. #453 5593 Seminary Br, of RDP Subd. #454 5594 Black Creek Subd. #455 'The District uses modified accrual basis of budgeting for each fund. FY 2012 Fund Basis vs. GAAP Basis Statement of Operations goo) Operating Revenues: Wastewater User Charges Stormwater User Charges Provision for Doubtful Accounts Licenses, Permits & Other Fees Stonnwater Interfund Revenue Other Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses: Pumping and treatment Collection system maintenance Engineering and construction management General and Administrative Stormwater 0&M Expense Depreciation Other Total Operating Expenses OPERATING INCOME/(LOSS) Add Non -operating Revenues: Revenue Bonds Tax Revenue Anticipation Notes Property Taxes Levied by the District Investment Income Grant Revenue Other Total Non -Operating Revenues Less Non -operating Expenses: Interest Expense Lossl(Gain) on Disposal of Utility Plant Non -recurring Projects and Studies Total Non -Operating Expenses NET INCOMERLOSS) NON -EXPENSE CASH OUTLAYS Capital Outlay (Equipment) Principal Payments Total Non -Expense Cash Outlays NET INCOME/LOSS After Non -Expense Cash Outlays FUND BASIS GAAP BASIS STATEMENT OF STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Adjustments OPERATIONS $ 224,321 1,359 (271) 2,802 18,265 2,503 $ 248,979 $ 53,009 36,514 17,176 50,146 18,265 0 0 $ 175,111 $ 73,868 $ 40,000 23,002 1,461 94 264 $ 64,821 $ 5,806 1,935 (7,741) (18,265) (1,790) $ 230,121 3,294 (8,012) 2.802 0 713 (20,055) $ 228,924 $ $ 53,009 36,514 (7,000) 10,176 50,146 (18,265) 0 48,000 48.000 23,500 23,500 $ 46,235 $ 221,346 $ (66,290) $ 7,578 $ (40.000) $ $ 23,002 1,461 94 264 $ (40,000) $ 24,821 $ 26,422 $ (26,422) $ 500 153,390 (148,585) $ 179,862 $ (174,557) $ (41,173) $ 3,267 19,404 22,671 500 4,805 $ 5,305 $ 68,267 $ 27,094 $ (3,267) $ (19,404) $ (22,671) $ $ (63,844) (1 $ 90.938 $ 27,094 0) Use of Fund Balance covers the Fund Basis Net Loss. FY2012 beginning fund balance is estimated to be $179.3 million resulting in an ending fund balance of $115.4 million. 45 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY The identification and prioritization of projects to be included in the Capital Improvement and Replacement Program (CIRP) is a multi -step process, requiring continuous monitoring and updating to ensure that the highest priority problems within the District are addressed in a timely manner, given funding limitations. These stages include: project identification, conceptual solution, preliminary study, final design and construction. At each step in the process the project scope is reevaluated to verify that it continues to meet regulatory requirements and customers' needs. The project cost is updated based on available information, and the project's priority is assessed to ensure that the highest priority projects are funded first. New projects are identified on an ongoing basis to ensure that the District is in compliance with the regulatory requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Missouri Department of Natural Resources, to address customer storm or sanitary problems, remedy deficiencies identified through planning studies and hydraulic analysis of the system, and implement required collection system and wastewater treatment plant upgrades. The total estimated CIRP for the FY 2012 budget year is summarized by project type on the following pages. For additional information on the stages of identification and prioritization of projects please refer to the Program Summary section of the FY 2012 Budget Supplement. 47 Capital Improvement and Replacement Program Fiscal Year 2012 Total Proposed $153.4 Wastewater Construction $121.7 79.3°/° Ss in mil 4 ons Continued Stormwater $2.1 1.4% Wastewater Engineering z $21.2 13.8% Stormwater — Construction $5.5 3.6% Continued Wastewater $2.9 1.9% 48 FY 2012 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY Type of Project Number of Individual Projects Project Costs Wastewater Construction 26 $ 121,685,000 Wastewater Engineering 21 21,220,000 Total Wastewater 47 $ 142,905,000 Stormwater Construction 12 $ 5,510,000 Stormwater Engineering 0 0 Total Stormwater 12 $ 5,510,000 Proposed Projects Subtotal: 59 $ 148,415,000 Continued Wastewater Projects Continued Stormwater Projects Continued Projects Subtotal: 2 7 $ 2,860,000 2,115,000 9 $ 4,975,000 FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECTS TOTALS 68 $ 153,390,000 49 CIRP Impact on Operating Costs Fiscal Year 2012 %gee Construction Protects I 888448RTNB18BLACK FOREST SANRARYRE0LeatNTPHASE I 42 BMW &Way Replacement 2.100100 2303 2,5555 0 81SSEll8LEMAYWW2 DISIIFECTONFACILITIES 43 662 SalayReplaerent 2290/000 0 0 0' BONOPLACE SANITARY SEWERS (SD d010094) 44 4102 Igo/erre&Fund 94,000 60 46 0 CHMHOUSE PUMP STATION (P•747)ELIMINATION 45 662 Saari Refitment 10020 450 398 0 CLAYMORE -BRANDY SANITARY RELIEF 46 620 SataryReplacement 30020 x 0 0 COLDWATERTRFATMENTRANT DISINFECTION FACLMES 47 SardmyReplacement 7.100000 0 0 0' CSO- MAMMA 1ERRACEAND DALE AVECSOINTERCEPTOR (MO%1M88• 128.127)SEPARAUON 48 6660 Salami Re t 700,000 1,151 23 0 O9LWOOSANITARY TRW( SEWER REHABIITAl10N 49 Scrim& Replacement 759000 x 0 0 EASSENTACQUERKINFOR COMBINED ISAMTARYPROJECTS (F7222) 59 6660 Saitary Reclacerret 202000 x 0 0 EO(EWOODSANITARY RELIEF (8P492MBP�i) 51 6E60 SakeyReplacmet 870,000 x 0 0 ELTON PUMP STATION(P•301)EUMINATION 52 6660 SadayRepbcernaA 3112000 850 658 0 EMERGENCY REPAIR FUND APPROPRIATION(F(2012) 53 4122 Wastewater EmvgaxyFur& 260200 z 0 0 FOREST VALLEY ODOR CONTROL PHASE II (INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR) 54 &May Reckon& 22.000 1,650 12T7 0 GRAND GLACE LAGOON WET WEATHER STORAGE IMPROVBENTS 55 6660 &citayReplacanmf 230000 140 108 0 GRAND GIMEWWTP BRIDGE REPAIRS 56 6669 Salary Repkcare& 66200 x 0 0 0 HERMRAGEIAREOUCTB)N2821E615) 57 6660 SaetaryReplacemel 2200.000 0 1,000,000 (350) INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIRS (SANRARYkOMBINED-FY2012) 58 6660 SaetaryReplaterent 102000 x 0 0 INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIAS(R100811TA1IO2(FY2012) 58 6660 SaOayRepkamal 15.000E0 x 0 0 LEMAYWWR'DISMFECiIONFACIL ES 60 6650 WOReccacemad 20200000 0 0 0' LEMAY WWTP MAINTENANCE BUILDING STRUCTURAL REPAIR 61 SarclayRglacemeA 32000 x 0 0 0 NERMECAND FOREST PARK PARKWAY SANITARYSEWER IMPROVEMENTS 62 5563 CMylonCentaOMCIFund 40.000 x 0 0 MISSOURI RIVER 80NFILSSANITARY SEWER REHABBRATION 63 520 MORiver Cod OKIFund 2200200 x 0 D MISSOURI RNER WWTP SECONDARYIREMMENT EXPANSION AND OWE ECTIONFACMIES 04 66E0 SaOary Replacement 40,00021 0 0 0' NECTAR NI REDUCTION (BP-290) 65 66E0 SaroUryRepacana4 435200 x 0 0 0 SPRMGDALELATERAL SANRARYRELIEF (21,4005) 66 620 Scria/Repiaenml VA AM 703 542 0 ST.LOUISFLOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM • CORPS OFENGMEERS 67 6560 SadayReplaanad 150000 x 0 0 ToWWastewater ConstectionProjects 121,62000 8,300 6426 1,000000 (3501 0 0 Storm/ate, Construction Projects BON 04(40074•E0019FLOOD MMGATKIN 103 5576 Maine Cnek 2000 k 0 0 COLDWATERCREEK ATLYNNTOWN BANK STABMIA110N 104 5664 Colic* Cm* 400.000 z 0 0 DEER CREIXWATERSHED NUM 105 5566 Deenreek 200200 z 0 0 DIAMOND HUD DR. STORM SEWERIGCUC-110) 106 5571 GraeosCrcek 960200 100 77 0 EMERGENCY REPAIR FUNDS(STORMWATER) 107 4123 SbimwalerEnergency 250.000 x 0 0 FAWNVAILEY STORM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS 108 5566 DeaCre*WC 996000 x 0 0 LYNNTOWN APARTMENTS CHANNELIMPROVEMENTS ICLD•19) 109 5564 CeldwalaCS 435,003 B5 66 0 MAGNET ERNE STORM SEWER. 110 5564 IhixersilyCity SAM 245 190 0 RMFHELERECEL95STORM SEINER REPLACEMENT 111 526 Deer Creek 065.000 1,060 821 0 SOUTH KIRKWOOD ROAD 0906STORM SEWERREPLACEMENT 112 5571 GrdvtECreek 291000 x 0 0 WEAVER MOUE 17761•07767FLOOD MTRGATION 113 5594 Mari Creek SrtdK155 1,02000 x 0 0 YANDOM08721SEWERREHA80.RAilON 114 5564 CaldxataCce* 254,000 1,015 72 0 Total StomwaterConsCucOanProjects 0511,000 2,505 1,939 0 0 0. 0 50 CIRP Impact on Operating Costs Fiscal Year 2012 CIRP Impact on Ooera5no Cosh CATEGOR -, 'a _ -_ --- - - - Feet Pipe C Added Im,., Cost Troealm>(. pact Plant, Wastewater Engineering Projects BSSELL&BOWWWII DISINFECTION FACURES 18 6660 Sara. Replacement 1.150.000 x 0 0 CCNgtSFIECTIONAND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OFSEWERS -NORTH 19 66E0 Sankey Replacement 1500,000 x 0 0 CCTV WSPECTIONAHD PHYSICAL INSPECTIONOFSEWERS -SOUTH 20 6660 SmiayReplacement 1500,000 x 0 0 COLDWATERTREATMENT PLANT DSMFECDONFAC61TIES 21 6650 SatryReplaownmA 570,000 x 0 0 COEWINEDSEWER AREA •INF&TRATIOIMNFLOWASSESSMENT(FYd1081 22 6660 Way Replacement 4000000 x 0 0 DUBBER CREEK SANITARY REUEFPHASE NAND VIREDUCTION 23 Salary Replacement 400,000 x 0 0 DEER CR®(SANITARY PROGRAM 24 6660 Soria)/Recimement 600000 x D 0 GENERAL SERVICES AGREEA6M•CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (FY20121 25 4102 Improvement Fund 100000 x 0 0 GENERAL SERWCESAGREEMENT- GEOTECHNCAL(FY1012)CONTAACTA 26 4102 knprovamrtFmtl 50000 x D 0 GENERAL SEANCES AGREEABNT•GEOTECHNICAL(FY2012)CONIRACT8 27 4102 Im:a nentFund 53,000 x 0 0 GENERAL SERVICESAGBEEAENT-GEOTECHNICAL(FY1012)CONRMCTC 28 4102 ImpmrementEni MOO z 0 0 GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT• SEWERS CHANNEL DESIGN (FYt011) CONTRACT A 29 4102 IprovemrdFoni MOO x 0 0 GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- SEWER & CHANNEL DESIGN (FY2011) CONTRACTB 30 4102 OrgnevemaOFrd 90000 x 0 0 GENERAL SERVICES AGRERENT- SEWERS CHANNEL DESIGN(FY2011) CONIRACTC 31 4102 Improvement E ni 90000 x 0 0 _ LEMAYWWTPDISINFECTION FACILITIES 32- 6660 Sontag Replacement 1200000 z 0 0 LOWER& MIDDLE RDP CSO CONTROLS 33 6fi60 SakeyRepbzmad 2,000030 x 0 0 FLAW RAINFALL DATA (FY2011) 34 6660 Sanitary, Replacement 130000 x 0 0 SEPARATE SEWER AREA -INFLOW BNFB.TRATION ASSESSMENTjFY2008) 35 6660 Sanitary, Reassociate 150O000 x 0 0 STREAM FLOW GAUGE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(ISGS) 36 4102 ImprovementFund MOM x 0 0 STREAM FLOW WATER OUAUTY SAMPLING {FY 2011) 37 4102 hnpcovernad Fuld 600000 x 0 0 WATERSHED FACOITYRANNINGPRASE II 38 6660 SoniagRecta:email 5,000090 x 0 0 Total Wastewater Engineering Projects 21,ame 0 0 0 0 0 0 Remoter Engineering Projects NONE 0 0 0 0 Total SlormwarEngineering Prole* " 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Continued Wastewater Projects CSO• GREENBRIAR COMBINED SEWER SEPARATION 70 6660 SaiayRephcanai 360,000 1,000 774 0 INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR 0367P CAULKS CREIRMP-750)PHASEV 70 6660 Sanitary Repbeemenl 250O000 x 0 0 0 0 Rd Cc dnedWasuvraerProjects 2060,000 1,600 714 0 O 0 0 Continued Stmmwates projects EAST WATSON AND KATHY CT. STORM IMPROVEMENT 116 5571 GramBCmdk 60000 x 0 0 F6LMORE-EWOTLANK STABBIIATION(GCKC-130) 116 5571 GmvoWCreek 230000 x 0 0 HARDWiCKCOURT CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS ANDSANITARYSOB PROTETIONIMCMO.510) 116 5576 Mehe met; 900030 150 116 0 FABLEAVEANDCARSONROADSTORMSEWER 116 5580 North bitch 172000 510 418 0 MARYAVENUE FLOOD MITIGATUN 116 5566 Dew Creek Ram x 0 0 SHIEFORDLANESTORM IMPROVFAIENT 116 5576 MaireCreel 123003 440 341 0 WIVE BIRCH WAY- CHEER ANN DANE STORM SEWER 116 5564 CrddwvlrCreek 120000 555 437 0 TnulContinued Storm atrProjects 2110000 1,695 1,312 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL COST IMPACT OF CIRP ON OPERATING COSTS $10,102 'Note:The fauWastewater TreaumntPlant Projects will not be ccmpleted in time to have an impact en the operaiy taus for FY2312 51 WASTEWA'1'E'R CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS The projects described in this section are related to construction, rehabilitation or maintenance repair of sanitary or combined sewers, improvements to existing treatment plants, and the reduction of inflow and infiltration into the sewer system. These types of projects help alleviate basement backups, address regulatory issues, enable the removal of sanitary and combined sewer overflows, and rebuild part of our aging infrastructure system. Twenty-six (26) projects are to be fimded at a total estimated cost of $121,685,000. The District's revenue source for construction of the majority of these projects is obtained from the Sanitary Replacement Fund, which received money from wastewater user charges and from the sale of revenue bonds. The remaining projects will be funded with revenues from various Operation, Maintenance, Construction, and Improvement (OMCI) Funds, Construction Funds, Special Funds, or the Improvement Fund. The property taxes collected within the boundaries of the OMCI Taxing Districts must be spent for improvements within their specific areas of collection. The Construction Fund and Improvement Fund also receive revenues from various connection fees. 52 PROJECT LISTING WASTEWATER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2012 Proiect Name CLAYTON CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION FUND MERAMEC AND FOREST PARK PARKWAY SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 MISSOURI RNER BONFIL CONSTRUCTION FUND MISSOURI RIVER BONFILS SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION SUBTOAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 IMPROVEMENT FUND BOND PLACE SANITARY SEWERS (SD 42010094) SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 WASTEWATER EMERGENCY FUND EMERGENCY REPAIR FUND APPROPRIATION (FY 2012) SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 SANITARY REPLACEMENT FUND BAUMGARTNER & BLACK FOREST SANITARY REPLACEMENT PHASE I BISSELL & LEMAY WINTP DISINFECTION FACILITIES CSO - CLAYTONIA TERRACE AND DALE AVE CSO INTERCEPTOR (I.101A,101B1L-126,127) SEPARATION CHAI HOUSE PUMP STATION (P-747) ELIMINATION COLDWATER TREATMENT PLANT DISINFECTION FACILITIES EASEMENT ACQUISITION FOR COMBINED/SANITARY PROJECTS (FY 2012) ELTON PUMP STATION (P-307) ELIMINATION FOREST VALLEY ODOR CONTROL PHASE II (INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR) HERMITAGE Ill REDUCTION (SKME-615) INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIRS (SANITARYICOMBINED - FY 2012) INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIRS (REHABILITATION) (FY 2012) LEMAY MP DISINFECTION FACILITIES LEMAY WWTP MAINTENANCE BUILDING STRUCTURAL REPAIR MISSOURI RIVER WWTP SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AND DISINFECTION FACILITIES SPRINGDALE LATERAL SANITARY RELIEF (SKME-305) DELLWOOD SANITARY TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM - CORPS OF ENGINEERS GRAND GLARE WIMP BRIDGE REPAIRS CLAYRIDGE - BRANDY SANITARY RELIEF NECTAR I✓I REDUCTION (BP-290) EDGEWOOD SANITARY RELIEF (BP-592) (BP-301) GRAND GLAIZE LAGOON WET WEATHER STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS = 22 Municipality Clayton Bridgeton Sunset Hills Various St Louis County St Louis City & County Richmond Heights Unincorporated St Louis County St. Louis City & County Unincorporated Balhvin Frontenac Various St Louis City & County Unincorporated Unincorporated Maryland Heights Bel -Ridge Dellwood St. Louis City Valley Park Unincorporated Bellefontaine Neighbors Various Valley Park TOTAL COST $480,000 $480,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $94,000 $94,000 5250,000 $250,000 $2,700,000 23,900,000 700,000 100,000 7,100.000 2,000,000 310,000 260,000 2,000,000 1,000.000 15,000,000 20,000,000 300,000 40,000,000 220,000 750,000 150,000 66,000 300,000 435,000 870,000 200,000 $118,361,000 GRAND TOTALS: NUMBER OF PROJECTS = 26 $121,685,000 53 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING PROJECTS The projects described in this section relate to the preliminary or final design of new or rehabilitated sanitary and combined sewer systems. Also included in this section are projects relating to combined and separate sewer overflow elimination and separation projects, additional appropriations for combined and separate sewer area inflow/infiltration assessments, combined and separate sewer area CCTV inspections and physical inspection of sewers, construction management services, and continued funding of the District's Watershed Facilities Planning efforts. The construction phase of design projects are planned in later fiscal years due to the complexity of the designs, the size of the projects, and the time required to obtain needed easements. Twenty-one (21) wastewater engineering projects are planned at a total estimated cost of $21,220,000. The cost estimates indicated are for only the required engineering work and do not include construction. The project scopes are fully described in the Budget Supplement document. 54 PROJECT LISTING WASTEWATER ENGINEERING PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2012 Project Name IMPROVEMENT FUND GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (FY 2012) GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- GEOTECHNICAL (FY 2012) CONTRACT A GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- GEOTECHNICAL (FY 2012) CONTRACT B ; GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- GEOTECHNICAL (FY 2012) CONTRACT C GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- SEWER & CHANNEL DESIGN (FY 2011) CONTRACT A GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- SEWER & CHANNEL DESIGN (FY 2011) CONTRACT B GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- SEWER & CHANNEL DESIGN (FY 2011) CONTRACT C STREAM FLOW GAUGE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (USGS) STREAM FLOW WATER QUALITY SAMPLING (FY 2011) SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS = 9 SANITARY REPLACEMENT FUND WATERSHED FACILITY PLANNING PHASE II SEPARATE SEWER AREA- INFLOWIINFILTRATION ASSESSMENT (FY 2008) COMBINED SEWER AREA - INFILTRATION/INFLOW ASSESSMENT (FY 2008) BISSELL & LEMAY WWTP DISINFECTION FACILITIES CCTV INSPECTION AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF SEWERS - NORTH CCTV INSPECTION AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF SEWERS - SOUTH COLDWATER TREATMENT PLANT DISINFECTION FACILITIES DC-06 DEER CREEK SANITARY RELIEF PHASE III AND III REDUCTION LEMAYWWTP DISINFECTION FACILITIES RADAR RAINFALL DATA (FY 2011) LOWER & MIDDLE RDP CSO CONTROLS DEER CREEK SANITARY PROGRAM SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =12 Municipality Various Various Various Various Various Various Various St. Louis City and County Various St. Louis City and County St. Louis County St. Louis City and County St Louis City and County Various Various St. Louis County Various Unincorporated Various Various Various TOTAL COST $100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 550,000 600,000 $1,670,000 $5,000,000 1,500,000 4,000,000 1,150,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 570,000 400,000 1,200,000 130,000 2,000,000 600,000 $19,550,000 GRAND TOTALS: NUMBER OF PROJECTS = 21 $21,220,000 55 STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS The projects described in this section are related to constructing storm sewers, channels, and creek bank stabilization, which will help alleviate flooding and erosion problems. There are twelve (12) projects planned at a total estimated cost of $5,510,000. The District's revenue sources to plan and construct these projects are from the District's Improvement Fund or from the property tax revenue in various Operation, Maintenance, Construction and Improvement (OMCI) Funds currently established throughout the District. 56 PROJECT LISTING STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT NAME MUNICIPALITY TOTAL COST STORMWATER EMERGENCY FUND EMERGENCY REPAIR FUNDS(STORMWATER) Various $250,000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 $250,000 COLDWATER CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND LYNN TOWN APARTMENTS CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS (CLD-19) Breckenridge Hills $435,000 WINDOM #8721 SEWER REHABILITATION Chadack 254,000 COLDWATER CREEK AT MN TOWN BANK STABILIZATION Breckenridge Hills 400,000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =3 $1,089,000 DEER CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND RUTH-HELEN-CECELIA STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT Brentwood 8665,000 FAWNVALLEY STORM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Des Peres 996,000 DEER CREEK WATERSHED INITIATIVE Various 200,000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =3 $1,861,000 GRAVOIS CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND DIAMOND HEAD DR. STORM SEWER (GCUC-110) Unincorporated $960,000 SOUTH KIRKWOOD ROAD #906 STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT Kirkwood 250,000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =2 $1,210,000 &ALINE CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND BON OAK #10074 - #10078 FLOOD MMGATION Unincorporated $50,000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 $50,000 UNIVERSITY CITY CONSTRUCTION FUND MAGNET DRIVE STORM SEWER. Olivette $50,000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 $50,000 BLACK CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND WEAVER AVENUE #7761- #7767 FLOOD MITIGATION Maplewood $1,000,000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 $1,000,000 GRAND TOTALS; NUMBER OF PROJECTS =12 $5,510,000 57 STORMWATER ENGINEERING PROJECTS No stormwater engineering projects are included in the FY 2012 budget. se CONTINUED WASTEWATER PROJECTS Some of the District's Wastewater Projects are continued from previous fiscal years due to difficulties in easement acquisition, the permit process from other agencies, design revisions or status, or other special requirements or issues. There are two (2) projects that were identified in previous budget supplements that are still in the design, permitting, and/or easement acquisition process. These projects have a total estimated cost of $2,860,000. The District's revenues to construct these projects are from the Sanitary Replacement Fund, the appropriate Operation, Maintenance, Construction, and Improvement (OMCI) Funds, or Special Funds. 59 PROJECT LISTING WASTEWATER CONTINUED PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2012 Project Name Municipality TOTAL COST SANITARY REPLACEMENT FUND CSO- GREENBRIAR COMBINED SEWER SEPARATION Ladue INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR #087P CAULKS CREEK "A" (P-750) PHASE V Chesterfield SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS = 2 $360,000 2,500,000 $2,860,000 GRAND TOTALS: NUMBER OF PROJECTS =2 $2,860,000 60 CONTINUED STORMWATER PROJECTS Some of the District's Stormwater Projects are continued from previous fiscal years due to difficulties in easement acquisition, the permit process from other agencies, design revisions or status, or other special requirements or issues. There are seven (7) projects that were identified in previous budget supplements that are still in the design, permitting, and/or easement acquisition process. These projects have a total estimated cost of S2,115,000. The District's revenues to constmct these projects are from the appropriate Operation, Maintenance, Construction, and Improvement (OMCI) Funds. 61 PROJECT LISTING STORMWATER CONTINUED PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT NAME MUNICIPALITY TOTAL COST COLDWATER CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND WHITE BIRCH WAY - QUEEN ANN DRIVE STORM SEWER Hazelwood $120,000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 $120,000 DEER CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND MARY AVENUE FLOOD MITIGATION Brentwood $500,000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 $500,000 GRAVOIS CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND FILLMORE - ELLIOT BANK STABILIZATION (GCKC•130) Kirkwood EAST WATSON AND KATHY CT. STORM IMPROVEMENT Sunset Hills SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS = 2 MALINE CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND SHIREFORD LANE STORM IMPROVEMENT Ferguson HARDWICK COURT CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS AND SANITARY SEWER PROTECTION (MCMB-510) Unincorporated SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS = 2 $235,000 65,000 $300,000 $123,000 900.000 $1,023,000 NORTH KINLOCH CONSTRUCTION FUND MABLE AVE. AND CARSON ROAD STORM SEWER Ferguson $172.000 SUBTOTAL NUMBER OF PROJECTS =1 6172,000 GRAND TOTALS: NUMBER OF PROJECTS = 7 $2,115,000 62 WASTEWATER Wastewater Projects $185.8M (includes continued projects from 08) 7108 7108 Issue Additional Bonds $45.0M Revenue Bond Election 815108 Authorization to issue $275M Additional Revenue Bonds FY 2009 Stormwater Impervious Rate Increase 111109 Stormwater Projects $14.4M Wastewater Projects $153.8M Issue Additional Bonds $112.0M F12010 Stormwater Impervious Rate deferred Stormwater Projects $]0.7M STQR_IWATER Wastewater Projects $154.8M Issue Additional Bonds $89.0M FY 2011 7110 Stormwater Projects $11.4M Wastewater Projects $145.7M Issue Additional Bonds $40.0M FY 2012 7111 Stormwater Projects $7.6M Wastewater Projects $42.8M 712 Stormwater Projects $5.1M * Represents a rate increase Represents Voter approval required 63 Multi -decade Capital Improvement and Replacement Needs FY 2003 to FY 2027 Es Million Total Total Total(1) Programffear 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2003 2013 2003 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Forecast Budget -2012 -2027 -2027 Collection System Improvement Treatment Plant Improvements Stormwater Replacement Lower Meramec WVYTP Other S38.0 S49.4 S76.6 S78.2 875.7 $124.5 S1092 S116.4 S95.8 $54.2 1.8 9.4 16.1 93.0 72.4 73.6 61.0 36.9 54.0 91.6 6.7 5.4 8.0 14.4 9.0 11.4 14.4 10,7 11A 7.6 7.6 81.7 97.3 10,9 5.7 5.5 2.7 0.5 5.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 1.6 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 OA $818.0 509.8 $3,596.0 902.7 $4,414.0 1,412.5 99.0 216.9 12.4 5.1 0.5 0.0 104.1 217.4 12.4 TOTAL $54.1 $145.9 $198.0 $196.6 $164.5 $215.0 $198.1 $164.5 $166.2 S153.4 $1,656.2 $4,504.3 $6,160.5 (1) As measured in 2002 Dollars. Annual funding levels beginning in FY10 assumes both Wastewater and Stormwater annual rate increases. 64 A fund established by administrative action to fmance the ordinary operations of the District. The General Fund may be used for any legally authorized purpose of the District. It is used to account for all revenues and activities of the District not provided for in any other fund. It may receive any and all revenues not specifically designated for other funds. All wastewater and stormwater user charges receivable, less allowances for uncollectible accounts, are recorded to the General Fund. Changes in Fund balance: The District maintains a minimum fund balance of 60 days or 16.4% of the next year's annual operating expenditures for working capital. The following tabs provide additional details of the General Fund budget by each 65 department. $180,000 $130,000 $80,000 $30,000 -$20,000 REVENUE TRENDS GENERAL FUND - FUND 1101 ($ 000) 111 User Charge Revenue It Taxes Grant Income Interest, Fees, Misc, Fund Balance Used for Revenue Stormwater Interfund Revenue Change in Fund Balance This analysis of MSD's revenues compares actual revenues received in 2009 and 2010, a forecast for 2011, budget for 2012, and projections for the years 2013 and 2014. A portion of the user charge revenues from the wastewater revenue funds are transferred to the General Fund to cover operating, maintenance, and replacement costs of the District. With the downturn in financial markets budgeted and projected interest income is based on 0.75% of investments. Connection fees are based on a flat rate per connection to the sanitary system and estimated based on historical trends and current market conditions. The Stormwater Interfund Revenue category was established for the FY2011 budget to report operation and maintenance expense incurred in OMCI funds that purchase General Fund resources. 66 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE GENERAL FUND• FUND1101 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 $ 15,964 $ 21,741 $ 16,911 $ 16,910 $ 16,463 $ 18.100 $ 15,479 Revenues: 0 & M Allocation from Other Funds $ 158,429 $ 138,499 $ 128,330 $ 129,129 $ 138,912 $ 135,125 $ 143,540 Siormwater Interfurd Revenue 0 0 18,265 18,265 18,265 18,448 18,816 Bond Proceeds 4,130 6,110 0 0 0 0 0 Wastewater User Charges (1,220) (4,406) (241) (197) (203) (203) (203) StomnvaterUser Charges (234) (1,469) (80) (66) (68) (68) (68) Ad Valorem Taxes 1,798 1,307 14,815 14,370 14,370 14,514 14,804 Interest an Investments 62 (98) 125 141 100 102 87 Grant Income 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connection and Other Fees 2,335 2,294 2,084 2,221 2,152 2,253 2,350 Rental Income 211 264 264 265 264 272 280 Miscellaneous 1,676 1,226 5 960 830 868 906 Total Revenues $ 167,234 $ 143,728 $ 163,567 $ 165,088 $ 174,621 $ 171,311$ 180,512 Expenditures: Personnel Services $ 79,004 $ 85,025 $ 85,485 $ 86,677 $ 89,710 $ 91,334 $ 94,276 Supplies 12,549 13,298 12,057 12,175 12,428 12,740 13,275 Utilities 12,550 12,355 14,280 14,164 14,440 15,120 16,404 Contractual Services 35,599 33,693 36,129 35,010 36,768 36,891 37,998 Capital Outlay 4,756 3,020 3,116 Z883 3,267 3,332 3,432 Construction & Engineering 12,283 1,117 0 0 0 0 0 Principal Payments 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 Interest & Fiscal Agents' Fees 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 Change in Landfill Closure Costs 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oper & Mtce Exp Allocations 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 Payments to Refunded Loan (347) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 156,457 $ 148,559 $ 151,067 $ 150,909 $ 156,613 $ 159,417 $ 165,385 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 10,777 $ 4,831$ 12,501 $ 14,179 $ 18,008 $ 11,894 $ 15,127 Interfund Transfers From (To): Mississippi River Principal & Interest (2205 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Emergency Fund (4122) 0 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 Water Backup Insurance Fund (4104) 0 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 Districtwide Stormwater OMCI (5110) TAX 0 0 (5,826) (5,492) (5,461) (5,516) (5,626) DW Stormwater OMCI (5110) Fund transfer 0 0 0 0 (2,000) 0 0 StormwaterO&M (5130) 0 0 (9,416) (9,134) (8,910) (8,999) (9,179) Stomrwater Replacement Fund (6700) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sanitary Replacement Fund (6660) (5,000) 0 (2,000) (2,000) 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ (5,000) $ 0 $ (15,242) $ (14,626) $ (16,371) $ (14,515) $ (14,805) Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 5,777 $ (4,831) $ (2,741) $ (447) $ 1,637 $ (2,621) $ 322 67 FUND BALANCEE,O,P. $ 21,741 $ 16,910 $ 14,170 $ 16,463 $ 18,100 $ 15,479 $ 15,801 $3.3 2.1°% $36.8 23.5% General Fund Budget by Natural Account Group Fiscal Year 2012 $14.4 9.2°% Ss in millions $89.7 57.3% Total Expenses $156.6 Personnel Services Supplies Utilities Contractual Services Capital Outlay Direct labor and other personnel - related costs continue to be the single greatest expense to the $12.4 District, amounting to over 57% 7.9% of the annual General Fund sa budget. SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES GENERAL FUND Personnel Services - 51000 Natural Account Group Personnel Services increased $4,225,076 or 4.9%from the FY2011 Budget. This increase primarily reflects $2,106,361 attributed to an increase in Pension costs due to the impact of market conditions on the plan's investments and $1,689,867 in Salary, Wages and FICA associated with a 2.5% salary increase. Adding to these increases was $480,727 related to an average 6% increase in the District's Group Insurance plan and $213,400 associated with Other Post Employment Benefits due to additional retirees. The increases were partially offset by a $229,450 decrease in Temporary Help for one-time staffing needs related to the District's implementation of an enterprise -wide technology system and a $76,256 decrease in Membership and Dues. All other personnel services expenses increased a net of $40,427. Supplies — 52000 Natural Account Group Supplies increased $371,247 or 3.1°% over the prior year budget. This increase primarilyreflects a $207,477 increase in Chemical Supplies needed to comply with stricter clean water regulations and $127,364for non -capital computer equipment needed for the implementation of the Maximo Work Order Management System. Adding to this increase was $92,341 in Machineryand Equipment Parts to extend the Irfe of District assets and $89,995 related to fuel price increases. Offsetting these increases was a $68,693 reduction in Instrument Supplies for one-time costs associated with Clean Water Act regulations. Hose and Construction & Building supplies decreased $39,675 and $30,756, respectively. All other supply expenses decreased a net $6,806. Utilities — 53000 Natural Account Group Utilities increased $159,776 or 1.1%. Electric usage is anticipated to increase $575,192 primarily due to an increase in utility rates and increased usage due to the Lemay Treatment Plant expansion. Adding to Oils variance were combined increases for telephone and water of $24,756. Partially offsetting these increases was a $440,172 reduction in anticipated natural gas usage. Contracted Services — 54000 Natural Account Group Contracted Services are budgeted to increase $639,064 or 1.8% over the prior year. This increase can be attributed to $485,819 for Laboratory Testing Services to perform a Force Main Evaluation; $450,000 for an anticipated bond election in FY 2012; $427,431 for continued focus on the Sewer Repair and Structure Cleaning Program; and $353,681 related to costs associated with an increase in filing liens on delinquent sewer service accounts. Partially offsetting these increases was a $373,185 reduction in postage related to fewer sewer service accounts billed monthly along with an increased participation in electronic billing; $270,787 related to a deferral of non -essential building repairs and services; $265,264 reduction in janitorial and grounds service needs; and a $205,264 decrease anticipated in collection service commission paid to collection agencies on delinquent accounts. All other contractual services increased $36,633. Capital Outlay — 55000 Natural Account Group Capital Outlay budget increased $150,405 or 4.8% over FY 2011 Budget. This can be primarily attributed to a $564,000 increase in motor vehicles for fleet vehicles deferred in FY 2011 and $230,970 for computer equipment associated with the implementation of Maximo Work Order Management System. Partially offsetting these increases was a $482,000 decrease in machineryand implements related to costs for the expansion of District's comprehensive Sewer Repair and Cleaning Program. In addition, structural improvements decreased $178,500 related to one-time District Headquarters improvement costs. All other capital outlay expenditures reflect a net increase of $15,935. es METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT General Fund Budget by Natural Account Group Moo) Fiscal Year 2012 BOARD OF TRUSTEES RATE COMMISSION SECRETARY -TREASURER CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GENERAL COUNSEL HUMAN RESOURCES FINANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING OPERATIONS Personnel Services Contractual Supplies Utilities Services Capital Budget Percent Outlay 2012 of Total $ 3,000 0 708,543 2,750 669,010 749,187 7,045,330 4,514.214 7,434,687 20,997,536 47,585,694 $ 0 S 0 $ 3.100 350 0 230.225 10,153 456 1,360.761 0 0 6,000 8,850 300 233.350 69,900 400 3,474,900 56,890 4,300 4,656.685 122,044 245,860 11,738,700 289,799 502,805 2,503,802 459,482 45,684 880.873 11.410,788 13,639,713 11,679,477 S 0 $ 6,100 0 230,575 5,680 2.085.593 0 8,750 0 911,510 0 4,294,387 3,200 11,766.405 68,900 16,689,718 115.500 10,846.593 11,700 22,395,275 3,062,085 87,377,757 TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET $ 89,709,951 $ 12,428,257 S 14,439,518 S 36,767,873 $ 3,267,065 $ 156,612,663 CIRP CONST. & ENGINEERING $ 0$ OS OS OS 0.00% 0.15% 1.33% 0.01 °/° 0.58°% 2.74°% 7.51 % 10.66% 6.93% 14.30% 55.79% 0 $ 0 0.00% TOTAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET $ 89,709.951 $ 12.428,257 S 14.439,518 S 36,767.873 S 3.267,065 $ 156,612,663 100% 70 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT General Fund Budget by Natural Account Group (Mg Fiscal Year 2011 BOARD OF TRUSTEES RATE COMMISSION SECRETARY -TREASURER CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GENERAL COUNSEL HUMAN RESOURCES FINANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING OPERATIONS Personnel Services Contractual Supplies Utilities Services Capital Budget Percent Outlay 2011 of Total $ 2,700 $ 0 0 350 642,822 10,253 2,750 0 638,951 15,650 752,342 69,900 6,628,367 51,000 4,400,678 115,569 7.248,032 92,953 20,386,672 480,792 45, 973, 859 11, 338, 274 $ 0 $ 3,100 0 230,225 1,356 1,151,811 0 6,000 300 174,650 400 3,694,050 4,300 4,395,151 246,540 11,366,544 503,596 2,156,360 43,610 861,250 13,363.565 10,971,220 $ 0 $ 5,800 0 230,575 5,680 1,811,922 0 8,750 0 829,551 0 4,516,692 4,000 11,082,818 216,900 16,346,231 126,660 10,127,601 53,300 21,825,624 2,476,217 84,123,135 TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET $ 86.677,172 $ 12,174,741 $ 14.163,667 $ 35,010,361 $ 2,882,757 $ 150,908,698 CIRP CONST. & ENGINEERING $ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0 $ 0.00% 0.15°% 1.20°% 0.01% 0.55% 2.99% 7.34% 10.83% 6.71 % 14.46% 55.74% 0 $ 0 0.00°% TOTAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET $ 86,677,172 $ 12,174,741 $ 14,163,667 $ 35,010,361 $ 2,882,757 $ 150,908,698 100% 71 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT General Fund Budget by Organization by Natural Account Group (5000) Variance • Increase (Decrease) FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 BOARD OF TRUSTEES RATE COMMISSION SECRETARY -TREASURER CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GENERAL COUNSEL HUMAN RESOURCES FINANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING OPERATIONS Personnel Contractual Capital Services Supplies Utilities Services Outlay Total FY12 Total FY11 Forecast Difference FY12 vs FY11 Percent of Difference FY12 vs FY11 $ 3,000 0 708,543 2,750 669,010 749,187 7,045,330 4,514,214 7,434,687 20,997,536 47,585,694 S 0$ 0 350 0 10,153 456 0 0 8,850 300 69,900 400 56,890 4,300 122,044 245,860 289,799 502,805 459,482 45.684 11,410,788 13,639,713 S 3,100 $ 0 230,225 0 1,360,761 5,680 6,000 0 233,350 0 3,474,900 0 4,656,685 3,200 11,738,700 68,900 2,503,802 115,500 880,873 11,700 11,679,477 3,062,085 $ 6,100 230,575 2085,593 8,750 911,510 4,294,387 11,766,405 16,689,718 10,846,593 22,395,275 87,377,757 $ 5,800 $ 300 230,575 (0) 1,811,922 273,671 8,750 (0) 829,551 81,959 4,516,692 (222,305) 11,082,818 683,587 16,346,231 343,487 10,127,601 718,991 21,825,624 569,652 84,123,135 3,254,622 5% 0% 15% 0% 10% -5% 6% 2% 7% 3% 4% TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET $ 89,709,951 12,428,257 14,439,518 36,767,873 3,267,065 156,612,663 150,908,698 5,703,965 4% CIRP CONST. 8 ENGINEERING $ 0 0 0 TOTAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET $ 89,709,951 12,428,257 14,439,518 36,767,873 3,267,065 156,612,663 150,908.698 72 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Operating Expense Budget and Variances Expense Object 51010 Salaries & Wages 51020 Overtime 51030 Compensatory Pay Accrual 51040 Sick Leave Accrual 51050 Vacation Accrual 51060 Worker's Compensation Pay 51070 Board Member Fees 51080 Floating Holiday Accrual 51090 Civil Service Commision Fees 51100 Emp Service & Incentive Awards 51110 Workers' Comp Settlements 51120 Membership & Licensing Fees 51130 Education Assistance Program 51210 FICA Taxes 51220 Group Insurance 51230 Pension Contribution 51234 FAP 51240 Unemployment Insurance 51250 Second Injury InsurancelTax 51300 Other Post Employment Benefits 51510 Temporary Help 51990 Accrued Salaries-IncrlDecr Total Personnel Services FY 2011 BUDGET $ 54,538,733 2,234,151 48,000 825,000 600,000 0 2,700 24,000 2,750 79,399 480,000 274,976 301,000 4,391,746 7,737,178 9,361,908 0 30,000 120,000 1,381,600 3,051,734 0 $ 85,484,875 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases $ 52020 Motor Vehicle Parts & Equip 52030 Machinery & Equipment Parts 52040 Machinery&Equipment- Non -Ca 52050 Construction & Bldg Supplies 52070 Hardware 1,075,077 315,460 2,578,721 36,650 2,014,410 95,742 FY 2011 FORECAST $ 56,392,340 2,253,506 (12,666) 860,885 564,738 69,669 2,700 (11,095) 2,750 76,269 480,000 151,230 300,000 4,433,914 7,662,344 10,573,002 0 16,433 120,000 1,381,600 3,286,3(19 (1,926,756) $ 86,677,172 $ $Change %Change from from 2011 Budget 2011 Budget 1,853,607 19,355 (60,666) 35,885 (35,262) 69,669 0 (35,095) 0 (3,130) 0 (123,746) (1,000) 42,168 (74,834) 1,211,094 0 (13,567) 0 0 234,575 (1,926,756) FY 2012 BUDGET 3% $ 56,173,638 $ 1% 2266,111 -126% 40,000 4%n 850,000 -6% 600,000 0% 0 0% 2,700 -146% 24,000 0% 2,750 -4% 70,865 0% 480,000 -45% 198,720 0% 301,000 1% 4,446,708 -1% 8,202,680 13% 11,468,269 0% 15,225 -45% 30,000 0% 120,000 0% 1,595,000 8% 2,822,284 0% 0 $ Change from 2011 Budget 1,634,905 31,961 (8,000) 25,000 0 0 0 0 (0) (8,534) 0 (76,256) (0) 54,962 465,502 2,106,361 15,225 0 0 213,400 (229,450) 0 %Change from 2011 Budget 3% 1% •17% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -11% 0% -28% 0% 1% 6% 22% 0% 0% 0% 15% -8% 0% 1,146,129 $ 285,110 2,728,919 21,500 1,983,610 96,990 1,192,297 71,052 (30,350) 150,198 (15,150) (30,800) 1,248 1% $ 89,709,951 $ 4,225,076 7% $ 1,165,072 $ -10% 313,310 6% 2,671,062 41% 20,310 -2% 1,983,654 1% 97,760 89,995 (2,150) 92,341 (16,340) (30,756) 2,018 5% 8% -1% 3% -80% -2% 2% 73 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Operating Expense Budget and Variances Expense Object 52080 Hose Supplies 52090 Electrical Supplies 52100 Instrument Supplies 52110 Chemical Supplies 52120 Laboratory Supplies 52130 Engineering & Drafting Supply 52150 Plumbing Supplies 52160 Paint Supplies 52170 Safety Supplies 52220 Janitorial Supplies 52240 Hand Tools 52280 Uniforms 52300 Safety Footwear 52310 TelephonelCommunic EquipfSuppl 52320 Office Supplies 52330 Computer Supplies 52340 Computer Equipment - Non•Capit 52360 Grounds Supplies 52370 Photo & Video Supplies 52380 Publicationsliraining Supplies 52390 Administrative Supplies 52400 Fumiture & Office Equipment - Total Supplies 53060 53070 53080 53270 Total Electric Usage Natural Gas Usage Water Usage Telephone Usage Usage FY 2011 BUDGET 210,810 751,427 740,541 1,882,752 137,552 4,750 271,434 46,668 317,838 175,267 313,700 323,014 130,035 25,244 184,898 199,029 16,799 26,150 7,710 120,370 48,012 6,950 FY 2011 FORECAST 198,875 806,900 771,740 1,713,483 147,845 4,500 367,454 45,417 322,543 215,550 283,050 329,657 129,985 24,174 183,878 152,376 18,900 27,350 6,806 110,033 44,967 7,000 $ Change from %Change from FY 2012 2011 Budget 2011 Budget BUDGET (11,935) 55,473 31,199 (169,269) 10,293 (250) 96,020 (1,251) 4,705 40,283 (30,650) 6,643 (50) (1,070) (1,020) (46,653) 2,101 1,200 (64) (10,337) (3,045) 50 -6% 7% 4% -9% 7% -5% 35% -3% 1% 23% -10% 2% 0% -4% -1% -23% 13% 5% -12% -9% -6% 1% 171,135 734,609 671,848 2,090,229 146,745 4,450 286,375 46,213 319,726 225,775 276,750 328,094 131,235 36,320 186,684 178,229 144,163 25,050 7,056 118,468 40,335 7,600 S Change from 2011 Budget % Change from 2011 Budget (39,675) (16,818) (68,693) 207,477 9,193 (300) 14,941 (455) 1 50,508 (36,950) 5,080 1,200 11,076 1,786 (20,800) 127,364 (1,100) (664) (1,902) (7,677) 650 -23% -2% -10% 10% 6% -7% 5% -1% 1%u 22% -13% 2% 1% 30% 1% -12% 88% -4% -9% -2% -19% 9% $ 12,057,009 $ 12,174,741 $ 117,731 $ 10,019,080 $ 10,315,641 $ 2,898,639 2,490,370 492,227 491,317 869,796 866,339 $ 14,279,742 $ 14,163,667 $ 296,561 (408,269) (909) (3,457) (116,074) 1% $ 12,428,257 $ 371,247 3% $ 10,594,272 $ -14% 2,458,467 0% 493,354 0% 893,424 -1% $ 14,439,518 $ 575,192 (440,172) 1,127 23,628 3% 5% -18% 0% 3% 159,776 1% 74 Expense Obiect 54010 54050 54060 54080 54100 54120 54130 54140 54160 54180 54190 54350 54360 54370 54390 54400 54410 54420 54440 54450 54470 54520 54530 54540 54550 54560 54570 54580 54590 54600 METROPOLITAN ST. L0UIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Operating Expense Budget and Variances Postage Office System Services Printing Services Advertising Services Travel Expenses Photo Services Bond & Liability Insurance Training Programs/Seminar Fees Data Imaging Services Courier And Freight Properly & Other Space Rental Lockbox Services Banking Services Total Board Of Election Commission Hospital & Medial Services Judgments & Claims Settlements Judgments & Claims Accrual Court Costs & Lien Fees Easement Acquisitions/Fees Collection Services Water Agency Data Services Professional Service Building Repairs & Services Janitorial Services Grounds Services Motor Vehicle Services Machinery & Equipment Services Equipment Rental Sewer Rep & Structure Cleaning Electrical Repair Services FY 2011 FY 2011 BUDGET FORECAST $ 1,890,149 1,511,305 2,201,443 2,136,382 431,641 386,118 300,601 233,191 342,643 315,576 17,310 11,360 2,835,351 2,835,351 455,204 447,344 105,110 99,110 136,880 135,461 120,998 118,694 678,845 674,213 163,950 83,000 0 0 565,709 565,709 580,000 330,000 0 10,991 416,716 398,897 10,000 10,000 4,058,824 3,946,563 482,520 492,240 8,789,530 8,662,243 1,437,590 1,387,705 1,325,120 1,206,642 569,612 540,613 230,050 212,250 1,795,844 1,778,26 276,332 314,313 1,308,820 1,550,220 426,927 450,748 $Change %Change from from 2011 Budget 2011 Budget (378,844) (65,061) (45,523) (67,500) (27,068) (5,950) 0 (7,860) (6,000) (1,419) (2,305) (4,632) (80,950) 0 0 (250,000) 10,991 (17,819) 0 (112,261) 9,720 (127,287) (49,885) (118,478) (28,999) (17,800) (17,258) 37,981 241,400 23,821 FY 2012 BUDGET -20°/a $ 1,516,964 -3% 2,318,052 -11% 365,856 -22% 248,019 -8% 349,945 -34% 5,560 0% 3,008,281 -2% 440,072 -6% 99,110 -1% 139,786 -2% 119,914 -1% 708,672 49°% 143,950 0% 450,000 0% 564,929 -43% 580,000 0% 0 4% 770,334 0% 10,000 -3% 3,853,560 2% 492,240 -1% 8,610,769 -3% 1,312,917 -9% 1,087,749 -5% 541,719 -8% 232,050 -1% 1,649,730 14% 257,412 18% 1,736,251 6% 385,042 $ Change from 2011 Budget $ (373,185) 116,609 (65,785) (52,672) 7,302 (11,750) 172,930 (15,132) (6,000) 2,906 (1,084) 29,827 (20,000) 450,000 (780) (0) 0 353,618 (0) (205,264) 9,720 (178,761) (124,673) (237,371) (27,893) 2,000 (146,114) (18,920) 427,431 (41,885) % Change from 2011 Budget -25% 5% -18% -21% 2% -211°% 6% -3% -6% 2% -1% 4% -14°% 100% 0% 0% 0% 46% 0% -5% 2% -2% -9% -22% -5°% 1% -9% -7% 25% -11% 75 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Operating Expense Budget and Variances Expense Object 54610 Instrument Repair Services 54620 Plumbing Services 54630 HVAC Services 54640 Damage Repairs & Services 54650 Waste Hauling 54660 Ash Hauling 54670 Other Govemmental Fees 54680 Laboratory Testing Services 54690 Safety Services 54700 Asbestos Removal Services 54710 Community Outreach Programs 54720 Tree RemovaliWeed Spraying Total Contractual Services 55010 55030 55040 55050 55060 55070 55080 55090 55110 Total Land Purchases Structural Improvements Processing Equipment Auxiliary Equipment Motor Vehicles Machinery & Implements Instruments & Apparatus Furniture & Office Equipment Computer Equipment Capital Outlay Total General Fund Operating Expense FY 2011 BUDGET FY 2011 FORECAST 316,526 120,440 441,040 27,900 1,760,314 448,000 657,431 30,350 74,800 11,000 34,600 252,600 332,824 116,673 461,350 25,900 1,678,116 465,000 677,769 29,750 86,455 13,000 32,100 246,600 S Change °/° Change from from 2011 Budget 2011 Budget 16,298 (3,767) 20,310 (2,000) (82,198) 17,000 20,338 (600) 11,655 2,000 (2,500) (6,000) 5% -3% 5% -7% -5% 4% 3% -2% 16% 18% -7% -2% FY 2012 BUDGET 576,754 139,660 310,940 27,900 1,850,839 280,000 653,759 516,169 88,768 11,000 64,600 248,600 S Change % Change from from 2011 Budget 2011 Budget 260,228 19,220 (130,100) (0) 90,525 (168,000) (3,672) 485,819 13,968 (0) 30,000 (4,000) 45% 14% -42% 0% 5% -60% -1% 94% 16% 0% 46% -2% $ 36,128,809 $ 35,010,361 $ (1,118,448) $ 0 300,000 419,600 15,000 1,110,000 786,500 162,600 30,780 292,180 $ 0 300,000 351,600 0 1,050,000 851,767 144,600 24,980 159,810 -3% $ 36,767,873 $ 639,064 2% $ 0 0% $ 0 $ 0 0% 0 0% 121,500 (178,500) -147% (68,000) -16% 365,000 (54,600) -15% (15,000) -100% 0 (15,000) 0% (60,000) -5% 1,674,000 564,000 34% 65,267 8% 304,500 (482,000) -158% (18,000) -11% 251,885 89,285 35% (5,800) -19% 27,030 (3,750) -14% (132,370) 45% 523,150 230,970 44% $ 3,116,660 $ 2,882,757 $ (233,903) $151,067,095 $ 150,908,698 $ (158,397) -8% $ 3,267,065 $ 150,405 0% $156,612,663 $ 5,545,568 76 5% 4% Expense Object 51010 Salaries & Wages 51020 Overtime 51030 Compensatory Pay Accrual 51040 Sick Leave Accrual 51050 Vacation Accrual 51060 Workers Compensation Pay 51070 Board Member Fees 51080 Floating Holiday Acaual 51090 Civil Service Commision Fees 51100 Emp Service & Incentive Awards 51110 Workers' Camp Settlements 51120 Membership & Licensing fees 51130 Education Assistance Program 51210 FICA Taxes 51220 Group Insurance 51230 Pension Contribution 51234 FAP 51240 Unemployment Insurance 51250 Second Injury Insurance/Tax 51300 Other Post Employment Benefits 51510 Temporary Help 51990 Acaued Salaries-IncrlDecr Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases 52020 Motor Vehide Parts & Equip 52030 Machinery & Equipment Parts 52040 Machinery & Equipment Non -Ca 52050 Construction & Bldg Supplies 52070 Hardware METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Total District Actual FY 2009 $ 50,509,206 3,465,020 30,811 825,984 643,700 27,338 1,850 12,827 120 127,504 413,308 226,875 156,682 3,986,655 5,747,119 8,142,570 0 "' 19,647 62,485 1,749,024 2,532,352 323,330 Actual FY 2010 $ 53,800,983 $ 3,176,114 32,895 840,300 747,782 56,723 1,700 35,215 1,680 119,739 204,220 264,433 168,493 4,213,857 5,822,997 9,583,166 0 23,455 85,379 1,562,131 3,966,156 317,152 Budget FY 2011 54,538,733 2,234,151 48,000 825,000 600,000 0 2,700 24,000 2,750 79,399 480,000 274,976 301,000 4,391,746 7,737,178 9,361,908 0 30,000 120,000 1,381,600 3,051,734 0 $ Forecast FY 2011 56,392,340 2,253,506 (12,666) 860,885 564,738 69,669 2,700 (11,095) 2,750 76,269 480,000 151,230 300,000 4,433,914 7,662,344 10,573,002 0 16,433 120,000 1,381,600 3,286,309 (1,926,756) Budget FY 2012 $ 56,173,638 2,266,111 40,000 850,000 600,000 0 2,700 24,000 2,750 70,865 480,000 198,720 301,000 4,446,708 8,202,680 11,468,269 15,225 30,000 120,000 1,595,000 2,822,284 0 Projected FY 2013 $ 56,729,053 2,288,883 40,000 850,000 600,000 0 2,700 24,000 2,750 71,574 489,600 202,694 307,020 4,493,642 8,669,540 11,767,591 15,530 30,600 122,400 1,748,120 2,878,730 0 Projected FY 2014 $ 58,430,924 2,357,549 40,000 850,000 600,000 0 2,700 24,000 2,750 72,289 504,288 208,775 316,231 4,628,451 9,167,589 12,066, 15,995 31,518 126,072 1,865,244 2,965,092 0 $ 79,004,407 $ $ 1,031,212 $ 304,851 2,556,722 0 2,076,841 98,692 85,024,570 $ 85,484,875 $ 86,677,172 $ 89,709,951 $ 91,334,425 $ 94,275,955 1,069,588 $ 252,755 3,356,096 9,122 2,514,490 116,971 1,075,077 315,460 2,578,721 36,650 2,014,410 95,742 1,146,129 $ 285,110 2,728,919 21,500 1,983,610 96,990 1,165,072 $ 1,188,373 $ 313,310 319,576 2,671,062 2,724,484 20,310 20,716 1,983,654 2,023,327 97,760 99,715 1,224,025 329,164 2,806,218 21,338 2,084,027 102,707 77 Expense 52080 52090 52100 52110 52120 52130 52150 52160 52170 52220 52240 52280 52300 52310 52320 52330 52340 52360 52370 52380 52390 52400 Subtotal 53060 53070 53080 53270 Object Hose Supplies Electrical Supplies Instrument Supplies Chemical Supplies Laboratory Supplies Engineering & Drafting Supply Plumbing Supplies Paint Supplies Safety Supplies Janitorial Supplies Hand Tools Uniforms Safety footwear TelephonelCommunic EquiplSuppl Office Supplies Computer Supplies Computer Equipment - Non-Capit Grounds Supplies Photo & Video Supplies PublicationslTraining Supplies Administrative Supplies Furniture & Office Equipment - 52000 Supplies Electric Usage Natural Gas Usage Water Usage Telephone Usage Subtotal 53000 Usage METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Total District Actual FY 2009 147,301 709,315 521,089 1,605,237 121,525 1,197 309,063 40,340 369,712 144,483 281,836 270,441 120,530 48,477 150,372 470,393 0 28,976 9,335 103,818 31,773 0 Actual FY 2010 192,927 980,927 536,990 1,520,561 120,998 1,760 412,131 38,339 344,443 176,526 332,425 301,481 123,528 17,938 128,681 481,537 73,913 19,376 8,840 126,820 32,099 6,629 $ 11,553,533 $ 13,297,890 $ $ 8,547,707 $ 9,092,155 $ 2,780,968 2,018,615 437,922 440,901 782,543 803,562 $ 12,549,140 $ 12,355,233 $ Budget Forecast FY 2011 FY 2011 210,810 198,875 751,427 806,900 740,541 771,740 1,882,752 1,713,483 137,552 147,845 4,750 4,500 271,434 367,454 46,668 45,417 317,838 322,543 175,267 215,550 313,700 283,050 323,014 329,657 130,035 129,985 25,244 24,174 184,898 183,878 199,029 152,376 16,799 18,900 26,150 27,350 7,710 6,806 120,370 110,033 48,012 44,967 6,950 7,000 12,057,009 $ 12,174,741 10,019,080 $ 2,898,639 492,227 869,796 14,279,742 $ 10,315,641 2,490,370 491,317 866,339 14,163,667 Budget FY 2012 171,135 734,609 671,848 2,090,229 146,745 4,450 286,375 46,213 319,726 225,775 276,750 328,094 131,235 36,320 186,684 178,229 144,163 25,050 7,056 118,468 40,335 7,600 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 174,558 179,794 749,301 771,780 685,285 705,843 2,194,740 2,414,214 149,680 154,170 4,539 4,675 292,102 300,865 47,137 48,551 326,121 335,904 230,291 237,199 282,285 290,754 334,656 344,695 133,860 137,876 37,046 38,158 190,417 196,130 181,794 187,248 147,0,16 151,458 25,551 26,317 7,197 7,413 120,837 124,463 41,142 42,376 7,752 7,985 $ 12,739,529 $ 13,275,346 $ 11,123,986 2,581,391 503,221 911,293 12,236,384 2,710,460 518,318 938,632 $ 14,439,518 $ 15,119,890 $ 16,403,794 78 Expense Object 54010 Postage 54050 Office System Services 54060 Printing Services 54080 Advertising Services 54100 Travel Expenses 54120 Photo Services 54130 Bond & Uability Insurance 54140 Training Programs/Seminar Fees 54160 Data Imaging Services 54180 Courier And freight 54190 Property & Other Space Rental 54350 Lockbox Services 54360 Banking Services Total 54370 Board Of Election Commission 54390 Hospital & Medical Services 54400 Judgments & Claims Settlements 54410 Judgments & Claims Accrual 54420 Court Costs & Lien Fees 54440 Easement AcquisitionsFees 54450 Collection Services 54470 Water Agency Data Services 54520 Professional Service 54530 Building Repairs & Services 54540 Janitorial Services 54550 Grounds Services 54560 Motor Vehicle Services 54570 Machinery & Equipment Services 54580 Equipment Rental 54590 Sewer Rep & Structure Cleaning 54600 Electrical Repair Services 54610 Instrument Repair Services METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Total District Actual FY 2009 $ 1,631,648 2,147,979 494,895 145,736 354,343 . 8,804 2,746,119 414,264 87,659 119,163 123,976 698,800 112,580 269,822 386,991 486,311 405,272 493,794 443,655 3,938,362 490,081 9,826,037 822,107 1,168,634 449,619 238,407 1,986,518 299,406 982,707 241,023 450,927 Actual FY 2010 $ 1,442,103 $ 2,255,416 344,524 165,202 289,206 9,217 3,077,592 321,491 88,284 126,408 133,485 733,039 6,664 0 524,766 543,849 (1,341,855) (82,038) 152,534 3,069,629 492,240 9,246,647 1,596,622 1,199,447 678,255 261,648 2,630,017 352,599 932,216 449,203 233,593 Budget Forecast FY 2011 FY 2011 1,890,149 $ 1,511,305 2,201,443 2,136,382 431,641 386,118 300,691 233,191 342,643 315,576 17,310 11,360 2,835,351 2,835,351 455,204 447,344 105,110 99,110 136,880 135,461 120,998 118,694 678,845 674,213 163,950 83,000 0 0 565,709 565,709 580,000 330,000 0 10,991 416,716 398,897 10,000 10,000 4,058,824 3,946,563 482,520 492,240 8,789,530 8,662,243 1,437,590 1,387,705 1,325,120 1,206,642 569,612 540,613 230,050 212,250 1,795,844 1,778,586 276,332 314,313 1,308,820 1,550,220 426,927 450,748 316,526 332,824 Budget FY 2012 1,516,964 2,318,052 365,856 248,019 349,945 5,560 3,008,281 440,072 99,110 139,786 119,914 708,672 143,950 450,000 564,929 580,000 0 770,334 10,000 3,853,560 492,240 8,610,769 1,312,917 1,087,749 541,719 232,050 1,649,730 257,412 1,736,251 385,042 576,754 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 1,547,303 $ 1,593,722 2,364,413 2,435,345 373,173 384,368 252,979 260,569 356,944 367,652 5,671 5,841 3,068,447 3,160,500 448,874 462,340 101,092 104,125 142,581 146,859 122,313 125,982 722,845 744,531 146,829 151,234 0 0 576,228 593,514 591,600 609,3443 0 0 785,741 809,313 10,200 10,506 3,930,631 4,0449,550 502,085 517,147 8,629,984 8,888,884 1,339,175 1,379,351 1,109,504 1,142,790 552,553 569,130 236,691 243,792 1,682,725 1,733,206 262,560 270,437 1,770,976 1,824,105 392,743 404,525 588,289 605,938 79 Expense Oblect 54620 Plumbing Services 54630 HVAC Services 54640 Damage Repairs & Services 54650 Waste Hauling 54660 Ash Hauling 54670 Other Govemmental Fees 54680 Laboratory Testing Services 54690 Safety Services 54700 Asbestos Removal Services 54710 Community Outreach Programs 54720 Tree RemovalfWeed Spraying 54800 Worker Comp Accrual Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services 55010 55020 55030 55049 55050 55060 55070 55080 55090 55110 Land Purchases Building Purchases Structural Improvements Processing Equipment Auxiliary Equipment Motor Vehicles Machinery & Implements Instruments & Apparatus Furniture & Office Equipment Computer Equipment Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Total District Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 61,978 79,103 120,440 116,673 83,466 213,903 441,040 461,350 75,868 74,343 27,900 25,900 1,570,104 1,715,821 1,760,314 1,678,116 308,400 293,187 448,000 465,000 582,030 619,784 657,431 671,769 22,410 24,685 30,350 29,750 40,484 61,376 74,800 86,455 6,805 16,750 11,000 13,000 64,057 18,006 34,600 32,100 249,159 191,460 252,600 246,600 63,938 452,376 0 0 Budget FY 2012 139,660 310,940 27,900 1,850,839 280,000 653,759 516,169 88,768 11,000 64,600 248,600 0 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 142,453 146,727 317,159 326,674 28,458 29,312 1,887,856 1,944,492 285,600 294,168 666,834 686,839 526,492 542,287 90,543 93,260 11,220 11,557 65,892 67,869 253,572 261,179 0 0 $ 35,599,337 $ 33,692,800 $ 36,128,809 $ 35,010,361 $ 0$ 0 30,793 0 52,200 32,971 458,252 381,789 23,707 2,750 2,621,778 1,740,072 520,240 281,701 116,972 97,571 120,155 59,851 811,887 423,553 $ 0 0 300,000 419,600 15,000 1,110,000 786,500 162,600 30,780 292,180 $ 0 0 300,000 351,600 0 1,050,000 851,767 144,600 24,980 159,810 $ 36,767,873 $ 0 0 121,500 365,000 0 1,674,000 304,500 251,885 27,030 523,150 $ 36,891,230 $ 37,997,967 $ 0 0 123,930 372,300 0 1,707,480 310,590 256,923 27,571 533,613 $ 0 0 127,648 383,469 0 1,758,704 319,908 264,630 28,398 549,621 $ 4,755,984 $ 3,020,258 $ 3,116,660 $ 2,882,757 Total General Fund Expenses $ 143,462,401 $ 147,390,750 $ 151,067,095 $ 150,908,698 $ 3,267,065 $ 156,612,663 $ 3,332,406 $ 3,432,378 $ 159,417,480 $ 165,385,441 80 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Rate Commission i Internal Auditor Board of Trustees Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer Executive Director General Counsel i i CBoard of Trustees [, 1 Human Resources Finance I Information Systems Engineering i Operations 81 Board of Trustees Mission 1. Develop public policies, through official action, to meet MSD's responsibilities for sanitation, storm flow and protection of water resources. 2. Develop general strategies to direct and supervise the Executive Director in the implementation of official policies and programs. 3. Generally oversee the implementation of appropriate recommendations contained in various internal and contracted studies; i.e. the Independent Auditor's Management Letter. Pension Fund Investment Consultant, Financial Advisors, and the Internal Auditor. 4. Direct and supervise the activities of the Secretary -Treasurer and the Internal Auditor. Description of Services Pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and subject to the limitations imposed by the Constitution of the State of Missouri, all powers of the Distract are vested in the Board of Trustees who enact District ordinances, adopt budgets, and determine policies. The Board of Trustees appoints the Executive Director, who executes the ordinances and administers the government of the District and all subdistricts (Sect. 1.020 of the Plan), and the Secretary -Treasurer (Sect. 7.020 of the Plan), and the Internal Auditor (Sect. 7.030 of the Plan). 82 Board of Trustees EXPENDITURE SUMMARY District Governance FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast S1.908 $2,210 $2,800 $5,800 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,908 $2,210 $2,800 S5.800 FY 2012 Budget $6,100 FY 2013 FY 2014 Proected Projected $6,168 $6,272 $6,100,/ $6,168 $6,272 so.om-/ so.00s—/ S0.005-/ S0.004-/ 0 E __ $0.003-/ Expenses $0.002� S0.001-i HBO "o "" "ti "'b "a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actual II Forecast (Budget Projected 83 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY District Governance FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services S1,850 $1,700 $2,700 $2,700 52000 Supplies 0 0 0 0 53000 Usage 0 0 0 0 54000 Contractual Services 58 510 100 3,100 55000 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,908 $2,210 $2,800 $5,800 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Budget Projected Proected $3.000 0 0 3,100 0 $3,006 $3,015 0 0 0 0 3,162 3,257 0 0 $6,100/ $6,168 $6,272 B4 Expense Object 51010 Salaries & Wages 51070 Board Member Fees 51120 Membership & Licensing Fees Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases Subtotal 52000 Supplies 53060 Electric Usage Subtotal 53000 Usage 54010 Postage 54100 Travel Expenses 54180 Courier And Freight Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services 55010 Land Purchases Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenses Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Board of Trustees Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Budget FY 2012 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 1,850 1,700 2,700 2,700 0 0 0 0 0$ 2,700 300 0$ 0 2,700 2,700 306 315 S 1,850 $ 1,700 $ 2,700 $ 2,700 $ 3,000 $ 3,006 $ 3,015 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 0 510 0 3,000 3,000 3,060 3,152 58 0 100 100 100 102 105 $ 58 $ 510 $ 100 $ 3,100 $ 3,100 $ 3,162 $ 3,257 $ "' 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 1,908 $ 2,210 $ 2,800 $ 5,800 $ 6,100 $ 6,168 $ 6,272 85 66 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET Human Resources Rate Commission Internal Auditor Board of Trustees Executive Director General Counsel Finance Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer Engineering RATE COMMISSION Operations Rate Commission 87 Rate Commission Mission Any change in a rate recommended to the Board by the Rate Commission shall be accompanied by a statement of the Rate Commission that the proposed rate change, and all portions thereof: 1. Is consistent with constitutional, statutory or common law as amended from time to time. 2. Enhances the District's ability to provide adequate sewer and drainage systems and facilities, or related services. 3. Is consistent with and not in violation of any covenant or provision relating to any outstanding bonds or indebtedness of the District. 4. Does not impair the ability of the District to comply with applicable Federal or State laws or regulations as amended from time to time. 5. Imposes a fair and reasonable burden on all classes of ratepayers. Description of Services There shall be a rate commission ("Rate Commission') to review and make recommendations to the Board regarding all proposed changes in wastewater rates, stormwater rates and tax rates or change in the structure of any of the foregoing ("Rate"). 88 Rate Commission EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Rate Commission FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Actual Actual Budget Forecast Budget Projected Projected $0 SO S461,150 $230,575 $230,575 $235,186 $242,242 TOTAL EXPENSES $0 SO $461,150 $230,575 ` $230,575 J $235,186 $242,242 0/50 0200 0.050 0.000 Expenses e re re re 1 { ck Actual 'Forecast 'Budget 'Projected 89 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Rate Commission FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Actual Actual Budget Forecast Budget Projected Projected 51000 Personnel Services SO $0 $0 $0 52000 Supplies 0 0 700 350 53000 Usage 0 0 0 0 54000 Contractual Services 0 0 460,450 230,225 55000 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES SO SO $461.150 $230,575 $0 350 0 230,225 0 $0 $0 357 368 0 0 234,829 241,874 0 0 $230,575 J $235,186 5242,242 90 Expense Object 51010 Salaries & Wages Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases 52320 Office Supplies 52390 Administrative Supplies Subtotal 52000 Supplies 53060 Electric Usage Subtotal 53000 Usage 54010 Postage 54050 Office System Services 54060 Printing Services 54080 Advertising Services 54100 Travel Expenses 54180 Courier And Freight 54190 Property & other Space Rental 54520 Professional Service Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services 55010 Land Purchases Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenses Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Rate Commission Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Budget FY 2012 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 0$ 0S 0$ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ O$ 0 S 0$ 0 0 0 150 75 75 77 79 0 0 550 275 275 280 289 $ 0 $ 0 S 700 $ 350 S 350 $ 357 $ 368 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 0 0 32,000 16,000 16,000 16,320 16,810 0 0 1,000 500 500 510 525 0 0 125,000 62,500 62,500 63,750 65,662 0 0 1,025 513 512 523 538 0 0 400 200 200 204 210 0 0 1,025 513 512 523 538 0 0 300,000 150,000 150,000 153,000 157,590 $ 0 $ 0 $ 460,450 $ 230,225 S 230,225 $ 234,829 $ 241,874 $ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0 S 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 0 $ 0 $ 461,150 $ 230,575 $ 230,575 $ 235,186 $ 242,242 91 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 92 / Board \ Of Trustees Rate Commission Internal Auditor Civil Service Commission Executive Director General Counsel SecretaryTreasurer Human Resources Finance Information Systems Engineering SECRETARY - TREASURER Operations L SecretaryTreasurer ___ j I Elections District Secretary Treasurer Audit Work ss Secretary -Treasurer Mission Secretary/Treasurer serves as secretary to the Board of Trustees, manages District funds, provides administrative support and oversight to the Audit function, and provides service to all customers. Fiscal Year 2011 Accomplishments 1. Coordinated and managed to completion the first phase of a Management Audit as required by the District's governing Plan. 2. Supported and helped facilitate the re -implementation of property taxes used to support the District's Stormwater business segment. 3. Supported the implementation of a new defined contribution pension program. 4. Obtained cost effective financing to support the District's extensive Capital Improvement and Replacement Program. 5. Completed the transition to a new Oracle based Financial System to handle accounting and portfolio management. 6. Helped earn a strong investment return for unutilized District funds in a difficult investment climate. 7. Assisted in the development of a Rate Case which will support the District's capital program through the end of fiscal 2016. 8. Worked to improve the District's communication with investor groups. 9. Assisted in the implementation of enhanced security for the new Oracle based systems. 10. Digitization of all meeting minutes back to 1954. 94 Secretary -Treasurer FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District Strategies/Objectives/Milestones 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Strategy 1: Educate &Partner with Stakeholders to Build Positive Relationships -- Objective 1: Execute Outreach Programs f) Develop a plan to address gaps identified in Management Audit. Strategy 2: Manage District's Costs & Revenues to Optimize Financial Performance Objective 2: Implement Cost Savings Initiatives a) Each Department to target top three opportunities for cost reduction & take action to maximize savings. Objective 3: Improve Long Term Financing Plans for District Needs a) Review status of CIRP supporting revenue and revise capital projects on an ongoing basis. b) Adjust multi -decade financing plan to support LT CIRP Program & regulatory requirements in response to EPA mediation. c) Manage District's LT Bonding Program based upon EPA mediation & CIRP project timing. d) Revise multi -decade financing plan to support Wet Weather Master Plan. Objective 4: Maximize External Sources of Funding a) Actively pursue grant funding. b) Utilize low cost loans where advantageous. d) Work to secure additional SRF financing for wastewater projects. e) Actively pursue the establishment of the Clean Water Trust Fund proposed by NACWA. f) Work with federal lobbyist to preserve a favorable SRF funding allocation. Ongoing Ongoin Ongoing Ongoing Strategy 3: Leverage Appropriate Technology to Integrate & improve District Business Processes Objective 1: Analyze Effectiveness of Re -Engineered Business Processes & Identify Future Improvement a) Define & implement metrics to measure improvements from re -engineered business processes. b) Re -visit business rase and perform costtibenefit analysis. c) Review organizational impacts of re -engineered processes and implement alignments as needed. d) Identify additional business process changes to improve effectiveness & efficiency of District. e) Review & ensure business processes & software tools to support EPA Consent Decree compliance reporting. Strategy 6: Create a Learning- & Business -Oriented Culture Based on Competency & Accountability Objective 1: Increase Organization Performance thru Succession Planning & Improved Organizational Communication d) Department Directors will have Department -wide staff meeting a! least twice a year. Ongoing 95 Secretary -Treasurer Department c?000 )0j. c • rya70 ,, �207 9 Personnel kJ. 2p� �la�' 2a2 2a� The FY 2012 total Budget of $2.1 million is an This budget reflects an increase of one increase of $274 thousand compared to FY 2011 Forecast. full-time equivalent position to add back The increase is related to an increase of $66 thousand the Internal Auditor. in Personnel Services and an increase of $209 thousand in Contractual Services. zg 9 Projected Budget 0 Forecast ElActual as Secretary -Treasurer Department EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast District Secretary Division $518,933 $281,385 5520,178 $297,123 Treasurer Division 599,399 477,706 447,990 6413,325 Audit Division 646,829 622,369 843,826 866,473 Elections 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,765,161 $1,381,460 $1,811,994 $1,811,921 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY District Secretary Division 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Treasurer Division 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Audit Division 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Elections 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 51000 Personnel Services reflects an increase of $141,710 related to Salaries 8 Wages and other benefits. 54000 Contractual Services reflects an increase for the Board of Election Commissions of $450,000 for anticipated ballot issues in FY 2012. Partially offsetting this increase was a reduction of $297,111 in Professional Services for auditing services. FY 2012 Budget $307,509 707,122 620,961 450,000 $2,085,592 2.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 FY2013 FY2014 Projected Projected $312,202 $321,750 720,426 742,836 632,759 651,918 0 0 $1,665,387 $1,716,504 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 7.00 97 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY District Secretary Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Adual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Senfices $238,216 $258,709 $484,000 $260,945 52000 Supplies 355 0 2,069 2,069 53000 Usage 0 0 0 0 54000 Contractual Services 280,362 22,676 33,579 33,579 55000 Capital Outlay 0 0 530 530 TOTAL EXPENSES $518,933 $281,385 $520,178 $297,123 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Technical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service1Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES This area is responsible for. 1) Maintaining the minutes of the meetings of the Board of Trustees and issuing the minutes prior to the next Board meeting. 2) Maintaining a complete record of all ordinances, resolutions and joumals. 3) Preparing the agenda for Board meetings. 4) Administering and maintaining oaths of office f the Directors and Trustees and maintaining inforamtion regarding conflict of interst situations. 5) Notifying the Mayor of St. Louis and the County Executive of St. Louis County of the expiration date of the Trustees' terms. 6) Coordinate the meetings and functions of the Rate Commission 7) Attesting to various documents and records. FY 2012 Budget $271,431 1,969 0 33,579 530 $307,509 1,00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0,00 2.00 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Proieded $275,402 $283,846 2,008 2,069 0 0 34,251 35,278 541 557 $312,202 $321,750 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 98 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Treasurer Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $291,420 $280,758 $57,078 $316363 52000 Supplies 5,118 3,097 7,544 7,544 53000 Usage 15 0 456 456 54000 Contractual Services 302,846 193,851 378,262 317,312 55000 CapitalOu0ay 0 0 4,650 4,650 TOTAL EXPENSES $599,399 8477,706 $447,990 $6413,325 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OfficialslAdministrative 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Professional 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Technical 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SenricelMaintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES This area is responsible for. 1) Maintaining depository relationships with banking institutions and preparing ash forecasts to ensure ash resources will be available to meet District obligations on a timely basis. 2) Investing excess funds within Plan constraints in a manner which mapmaes yields on investments. 3) Monitoring the pension and deferred compensation plans of the District 4) Monitoring the deposit of all monies coming into the District. 5) Coordinating activities related to the issuance of debt. 6) Act as liaison for all investor -related activities. FY 2012� Budget S316,210 7.544 456 378,262 4,650 $707,122 1.00 0.00 0 1.00 0 0 2.00/ FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $321,696 $332,144 7,695 7,926 465 479 385,827 397,402 4,743 4,885 $720,426 $742,836 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 99 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Audit Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Adual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $102,328 $103,184 $25,755 $63,513 52000 Supplies 311 316 640 640 53000 Usage 463 444 900 900 54000 ContractualSeruices 543,727 458,401 816,031 800,920 55000 Capital Outlay 0 60,024 500 500 TOTAL EXPENSES $646,829 $622,369 $843,826 $866,473 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OfficialslAdministrative 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Technical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service/Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 TOTAL POSITIONS 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Description of Services Provide contract administration for the annual audit of the District's Financial Statements and for the out- sourced Internal Audit function. FY 2012 Budget S120,901 640 0 498,920 500 $620,961 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00i FY 2013 FY 2014 Proiected Proiected $122,698 $126,556 653 672 0 0 508,898 524,165 510 525 $632,759 $651,918 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 100 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Elections FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Servces $0 $0 SO SO 52000 Supplies 0 0 0 0 53000 Usage 0 0 0 0 54000 Contractual Sences 0 0 0 0 55000 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $0 S0 $0 SO Description of Services Serves as the administrative liaison between the Legal Department and the Board of Election Commissioners to assure that the appropriate issues are placed on the ballot in an appropriate and timely fashion. FY 2012 Budget s0 0 0 450,000 0 $450,000 FY2013 FY2014 Projected Proiected 101 Expense Object 51010 Salaries & Wages 51120 Membership & Licensing Fees 51210 FICA Taxes 51220 51230 51510 51990 Group Insurance Pension Contribution Temporary Help Accrued Salaries-IncrlDecr Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases 52090 Electrical Supplies 52220 Janitorial Supplies 52240 Hand Tools 52310 TelephonelCommunic EquiplSuppl 52320 Office Supplies 52330 Computer Supplies 52340 Computer Equipment - Non-Capit 52380 Publications/Training Supplies 52390 Administrative Supplies Subtotal 52000 Supplies 53060 Electric Usage 53270 Telephone Usage Subtotal 53000 Usage 54010 54050 54060 54080 54100 Postage Office System Services Printing Services Advertising Services Travel Expenses METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Secretary Treasurer Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 $ 471,552 $ 482,132 $ 406,596 $ 487,714 1,676 950 1,370 1,370 32,450 32,763 28,570 31,233 45,776 40,624 47,497 50,063 76,017 85,879 82,800 88,362 230 0 0 0 4,263 303 0 (15,920) $ 631,964 $ 642,651 S 566,833 $ 642,822 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 107 28 0 0 0 9 0 0 450 0 0 0 332 0 0 0 998 731 4,297 4,297 383 297 0 0 0 182 0 0 1,469 1,835 3,195 3,195 2,045 330 2,761 2,761 $ 5,784 $ 3,413 $ 10,253 $ 10,253 Budget FY 2012 $ 514,260 1,564 36,769 56,928 99,022 0 0 $ 708,543 S 0 0 0 0 0 4,297 0 0 3,195 2,661 $ 10,153 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 519,352 $ 534,932 1,595 1,643 37,107 38,220 60,136 63,564 101,606 104,187 0 0 0 0 $ 719,796 $ 742,546 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,383 4,514 0 0 0 0 3,259 3,357 2,714 Z796 $ 10,356 $ 10,667 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0 0 478 444 1,356 1,356 465 479 $ 478 $ 444 $ 1,356 $ 1,356 $ 456 $ 465 $ 479 $ 0 456 $ 79 $ 88 $ 164 $ 164 $ 37,410 37,425 30,940 30,940 625 1,750 500 500 15,181 18,332 20,503 20,503 1,697 2,569 3,930 3,930 164 $ 167 $ 172 30,940 31,559 32,506 500 510 525 20,503 20,913 21,540 3,930 4,009 4,129 102 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Secretary Treasurer Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast Expense Mint FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 54140 Training Programs/Seminar Fees 910 2,579 6,370 6,370 54160 Data Imaging Services 0 0 2,500 2,500 54180 Courier And Freight 4,393 2,622 3,332 3,332 54190 Property & Other Space Rental 6,543 6,337 6,365 6,365 54360 Banking Services Total 112,580 6,664 163,950 83,000 54370 Board Of Election Commission 269,822 0 0 0 54400 Judgments & Claims Settlements 8 37 0 0 54520 Professional Service 674,187 596,473 984,013 988,902 54670 Other Govemmental Fees 3,500 0 5,305 5,305 54710 Community Outreach Programs 0 50 0 0 Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services $ 1,126,935 $ 674,927 $ 1,227,872 $ 1,151,811 55010 Land Purchases $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 55090 Furniture & Office Equipment 0 0 3,530 3,530 55110 Computer Equipment 0 60,024 2,150 2,150 Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay Budget FY 2012 6,370 2,500 3,332 6,365 143,950 450,000 0 686,902 5,305 0 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 6,497 6,692 2,550 2,626 3,399 3,501 6,492 6,687 146,829 151,234 0 0 0 0 700,640 721,659 5,411 5,573 0 0 $ 1,360,761 $ 0 3,530 2,150 $ 0 $ 60,024 $ 5,680 $ 5,680 Total General Fund Expenses $ 1,765,161 $ 1,381,460 $ 1,811,994 $ 1,811,922 $ 5,680 $ 2,085,593 $ 928,976 $ 956,846 $ 0 $ 0 3,601 3,709 Z193 2,259 $ 5,794 $ 5,967 $ 1,665,387 S 1,716,505 103 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 104 Rate Commission Internal Auditor Board of Trustees Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer Executive Director General Counsel I 1 Human Resources Finance Information Systems Engineering CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Operations Civil Service Commission 105 Civil Service Commission Mission The Civil Service Commission shall: 1. Advise the Board, Executive Director, and Human Resources Director on problems concerning personnel administration. 2. Investigate certain personnel administrative decisions in the District service and report to the Board at least once a year its findings, conclusions, and recommendations. 3. Recommend civil service rules to the Board. 4. Hear appeals from disciplinary action. 5. Advise, assist, and cooperate in fostering the interest of institutions of leaming and civic, professional, and employee organizations in the improvement of personnel standards and conditions in the District. Description of Services There shall be a civil service commission to hold public hearings upon proposed civil service rules recommended by the Human Resources Director or by the Civil Service Commission. After such hearing, the Commission shall approve or reject the rules wholly or in part, or may modify them and approve them as so modified. The rules approved by the Commission shall then be submitted to the Board and shall become effective when adopted by ordinance. Such rules and ordinances shall include such provisions as may be necessary to establish a merit system for all positions in the classified service, and shall include a prohibition against the appointment, promotion, reduction, suspension, or removal of any officer or employee in the classified service, or seeking admission thereto, without just cause or because of his race, creed or color, or because of his political, religious, or union opinions or affiliations, except affiliations with any group or organization which seeks or advocates the overthrow of the government of the United States by force or violence or because of any other reason prohibited by law, 106 Civil Service Commission EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Personnel Advisor FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $720 $4,874 $8,750 $8,750 TOTAL EXPENSES $720 $4,874 $8,750 $8,750 FY 2012 Budget $8,750 S8,750 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $8,870 $9,054 $8,870 $9,054 In millions Expenses s0.010-/ S0.008-/ S0.008-/ $0.004- $0.002- s en mn / • 44 44 44 44 44 44 Actual Forecast 'Budget 'Projected 107 Personnel Advisor FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $120 $1,680 $2,750 $2,750 52000 Supplies 0 0 0 0 53000 Usage 0 0 0 0 54000 Contractual Service NO 3,194 6,000 6,000 55000 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $720 S4,874 $8,750 $8.750 FY 2012 Budget 62,750 0 0 6,000 0 $8,750y FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected 62.750 $2,750 0 0 0 0 6,120 6,304 0 0 S8,870 $9,054 108 Expense obiect 51010 Salaries i£ Wages 51090 CMI Service Commision Fees Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubncants,Gases Subtotal 52000 Supplies 53060 Electric Usage Subtotal 53000 Usage 54010 Postage 54520 Professional Service Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services 55010 Land Purchases Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay Total General Fund Expenses Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Civil Service Commission Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Budget FY 2012 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 S 0 S 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 120 1,680 2,750 Z750 2,750 2,750 2,750 $ 120 $ 1,680 $ 2,750 $ Z750 $ 2,750 $ 2,750 $ Z750 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 0 $ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 600 3,194 6,000 6,000 6.000 6,120 6,304 $ 600 S 3,194 S 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,120 $ 6,304 $ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0 S 0 S 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 720 S 4,874 $ 8,750 $ 8,750 $ 8.750 $ 8,870 $ 9,054 109 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 110 Human Resources Rate Commission Internal Auditor Board of Trustees Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer Executive Director General Counsel Finance Information Systems r- Engineering EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Operations Executive Director 1 District I Public Administration Information 111 Executive Director Mission The Mission of the Executive Director's Department is to ensure that all affairs of the District are in accordance with the Charter of MSD and the policies of the Board of Trustees and to inform and engage the stakeholders regarding the services they receive from MSD and the District's importance to the community. Fiscal Year 2011 Accomplishments 1. Reviewed recommendations of the Charter Change Committee with the Board of Trustees in preparation for a Charter Change election. 2. Held orientation sessions with state elected officials to better educate them on the workings and initiatives of the District. 3. Worked with state and federal lobbyists regarding the District's legislative agendas addressing potentially costly regulatory requirements, refusal of the Federal Government to pay for stormwater services, and legislation to advance the District's infrastructure re- investment. 4. Filled the General Counsel vacancy with a highly qualified internal candidate, 5. Filled Rate Commission vacancies and prepared the commission in preparation for the May 2011 Rate Change Notice. 6. Conducted rain barrel sales to District customers to help address stormwater impacts. 7. Conducted numerous public meetings concerning severe flooding and sewer backups in the central and northern parts of the District. 112 Executive Director FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District StrategieslObjectiveslMilestones 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Strategy 1: Educate & Partner with Stakeholders to Build Positive Relationships Objective 1: Execute Outreach Programs a) Integrate key messaging into public communication functions & coordinate District Outreach activities. b) Implement Public Communication Plan (formerly SSO Public Communication Plan). 0 Communicate slormwater & green infrastructure activities to stakeholders. d) Develop & implement stakeholder interviews to understand stakeholders' perceptions of the District e) Implement Infilbationllnflow (Ill) Communication Plan. f) Develop a plan to address gaps identified in Management Audit Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Objective 2: Strengthen the Legislative Outreach Programs a) Conduct meetings with City, County & State officials regarding District goals & needs. h) Conduct annual legislative briefings. c) Develop & implement changes directly associated to the measured effectiveness of past Legislative Outreach Program initiatives. d) Provide annual scorecard of program effectiveness. -_-- Strategy 2: Manage District's Costs & Revenues to Optimize Financial Performance Objective 2: Implement Cost Savings Initiatives a) Each Department to target top three opportunities for cost reduction & lake action to maximize savings. Strategy 4: Promote Appropriate Reg standards thru Proactive Gov't Involvement Objective 1: Participate in formation of new laws thru Proactive Involvement with Federal & State Agencies a) Identify and develop State & Federal priorities by September 1st each year. b) Obtain sponsor & identify lobbying partners for new legislation by December 1 each year. c) Educate legislators to achieve legislative agenda. d) Measure success rate of prior fiscal year regulatory goals. - Strategy 6: Create a Learning- & Business -Oriented Culture Based on Competency & Accountability Objective 1: Increase Organization Performance thru Succession Planning & Improved Organizational Communication d) Department Directors will have Departinent-wide staff meeting at least twice a year. Ongoing 113 $0.8 - o $0.6 7 c $0.4 f $0.2 7 $0.0 Executive Director Department Expenses ago 20'7 Q072 130 �'v 4fo 3/ 2/ 011--- k} k} k} �F t 20 20 20 2� ,o ,� % ,t, ,0 o 4 Personnel Projected Budget 0 Forecast 0Actual The Executive Directors operating budget for FY 2012 This budget reflects no change in the number of full-time is $912 thousand, an increase of $82 thousand primarily equivalent positions allocated to this department. included in Contractual Services and Personnel Services. 114 Executive Director Department FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Actual Actual Budget Forecast District Administration Division $368,798 $395,573 $421,961 $415,681 Public Information Division 462,011 433,078 410,396 413,869 TOTAL EXPENSES $830,809 $828,651 $832,357 $829,550 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY District Administration Division Public Information Division 2,00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 51000 Personnel Services increased S30,057 primarily due to scheduled wage and related benefits, in addition to a S14,510 increase in Temporary Help anticipated for administrative assistance. 54000 Contractual Services increased by $58,700; $30,000 related to Community Outreach Programs and a $25,000 increase in Professional Services. FY 2012 Budget $433,700 477,809 $911,509 2.00 2.00 4.00 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Proiected $440,541 $453,968 486,290 500,810 $926,831 $954,778 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4,00 4.00 115 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY District Administration Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Adual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $349,958 $380,760 $409,561 $403,281 52000 Supplies 2,563 1,080 4,300 4,300 53000 Usage 0 0 0 0 54000 Contractual Services 16,277 13,733 8,100 8,100 55000 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $368,798 $395,573 $421,961 $415,681 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OklalslAdministrative 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Technical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service/Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES Responsible for the effective and efficient management of all District functions in accordance with the Plan of the District and as directed by the Board of Trustees. FY 2012� Budget $413,500 3,100 0 17,100 0 $433,700 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $419,937 $432,746 3,162 3,257 0 0 17,442 17,965 0 0 $440,541 $453,968 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 116 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Public Information Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services S191,161 S248,192 $232,196 $235,669 52000 Supplies 4,829 7,084 11,350 11,350 53000 Usage 461 275 300 300 54000 Contractual Services 265,297 177,527 166,550 166,550 55000 Capital Outlay 264 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $462,012 S433,078 $410,396 $413,869 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Technical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ServicelMaintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 2.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES 2.00 2,00 2.00 Public Information Division informs the District's stakeholders about the services they received from MSD and the Districts importance to the community through news releases, press events, newsletters and other activities. These efforts are designed to inform and engage the public in District activities. FY 2012 Budget S255,509 5,750 300 216,250 0 $477,809 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Protected Protected $259,544 $267,262 5,865 6,041 306 315 220,575 227,192 0 0 $486,290 $500,810 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 117 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Executive Director Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast Expense Obiect FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 51010 Salaries & Wages $ 365,500 $ 375,506 $ 390,960 $ 396,231 51100 Emp Service & Incentive Awards 16,143 9,276 11,750 11,750 51120 Membership & Licensing Fees 50,079 94,165 85,785 85,785 51210 FICA Taxes 21,923 22,165 24,070 19,142 51220 Group Insurance 23,633 20,502 27,426 26,882 51230 Pension Contribution 58,922 66,886 66,276 76,400 51510 Temporary Help 1,581 39,797 35,490 35,490 51990 Accrued Salaries-IncrlDecr 3,338 655 0 (12,729) Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services $ 541,119 $ 628,953 $ 641,757 $ 638,951 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases 52030 Machinery & Equipment Parts 52070 Hardware 52090 Electrical Supplies 52100 Instrument Supplies 52240 Hand Tools 52320 Office Supplies 52330 Computer Supplies 52370 Photo & Video Supplies 52380 Publicationsliraining Supplies 52390 Administrative Supplies Subtotal 52000 Supplies $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0 25 0 0 5 0 0 0 47 46 0 0 69 0 0 0 235 0 0 0 1,338 413 1,700 1,700 62 179 250 250 21 0 1,000 1,000 1,758 1,029 1,500 1,500 3,857 6,471 11,200 11,200 5 7,392 $ 8,163 $ 15,650 $ 15,650 Budget FY 2012 $ 392,019 11,750 81,500 24,541 27,904 81,296 50,000 0 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 395,900 $ 497,777 11,867 11,986 83,130 85,624 24,729 25,471 29,437 31,084 83,418 85,536 51,000 52,530 0 0 $ 669,010 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,100 250 1,000 1,500 4,000 $ 8,850 $ 679,481 $ 700,008 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,142 2,206 255 263 1,020 1,051 1,530 1,576 4,080 4,202 $ 9,027 $ 9,298 53060 Electric Usage $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0 53270 Telephone Usage 461 275 300 300 300 306 315 Subtotal 53000 Usage $ 461 $ 275 $ 300 $ 300 $ 300 $ 306 $ 315 54010 Postage $ 270 S 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 54050 Office System Services 0 0 350 350 350 357 368 54060 Printing Services 9,207 1,844 7,500 7,500 5,000 5,100 5,253 116 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Executive Director Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast Expense Object FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 54080 Advertising Services 18,553 15,026 2,500 2,500 54100 Travel Expenses 10,472 16,214 14,550 14,550 54120 Photo Services 459 536 4,000 4,000 5414D Training Programs1SeminarFees 2,652 5,201 3,300 3,300 54160 Data Imaging Services 57 503 0 0 54180 Courier And Freight 640 471 700 700 54190 Properly & Other Space Rental 479 510 3,000 3,000 54520 Professional Service 232,647 147,155 125,000 125,000 54580 Equipment Rental 0 186 3,750 3,750 54710 Community Outreach Programs 6,138 3,615 10,000 10,000 Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services $ 281,574 $ 191,260 $ 174,650 $ 174,650 55010 Land Purchases $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 55080 Instruments & Apparatus 264 0 0 0 Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay $ 264 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Total General Fund Expenses $,, 830,810 S 828,651 $ 832,357 $ 829,551 Budget FY 2012 2,500 15,500 4,000 15,000 0 400 600 150,000 0 40,000 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 2,550 2,626 15,810 16,284 4,080 4,202 15,300 15,759 0 0 408 420 612 630 153,000 157,590 0 0 40,800 42,024 $ 233,350 0 0 $ 238,017 $ 245,158 $ 0 $ 911,510 $ 0 $ 0 $ 926,831 $ 954,779 119 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 120 Human Resources / Boarcr `\ of Trustees Rate Commission Internal Auditor General Counsel rignmpirr Finance Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer Executive Director Information Systems Engineering GENERAL COUNSEL Operations General Counsel Legal Litigation and Legal Administration Claims Collections 121 General Counsel Mission The General Counsel's office is responsible for all legal matters conceming the District. The Department provides legal services and guidance as requested or required by the Board of Trustees, Executive Director and District staff. Fiscal Year 2011 Accomplishments 1. Successfully negotiated a draft settlement agreement in the US, State of MO, Coalition for the Environment v. MSD litigation. 2. Further incorporated the use of e-billing and document management system into office procedures. 3. Successfully worked with MSD's Engineering Department to obtain numerous required easements associated with the maintenance and expansion of the sewer system. 11. 4. Managed a coordinated property buy-out process for projects associated with NS regulatory compliance and customer service level issues. 5. Successfully defended the District before the Civil Service Commission and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in numerous civil litigation and real estate matters. 122 General Counsel FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District Strategies/Objectives/Milestones 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan I Feb Mar Apr Mayl Jun Strategy 1: Educate & Partner with Stakeholders to Build Positive Relationships Objective 2: Strengthen the Legislative Outreach Programs a) Conduct meetings with Ci y, County & State officials regarding District goals & needs. b) Conduct annual legislative briefings. c) Develop & implement changes directly associated to the measured effectiveness of past Legislative Outreach Program initiatives. d) Provide annual scorecard of program effectiveness. 011101111 Strategy 2: Manage District's Costs & Revenues to Optimize Financial Performance Objective 2: Implement Cost Savings Initiatives a) Each Department to target top three opportunities for cost reduction & take action to mapmize savings. Objective 4: Maximize Extemal Sources of Funding e) Actively pursue the establishment of the Clean Water Trust Fund proposed by NACWA. f) Work with federal lobbyist to preserve a favorable SRF funding allocation. _ Ongoing Strategy 3: Leverage Appropriate Technology to Integrate & improve District Business Processes Objective 1: Analyze Effectiveness of Re -Engineered Business Processes & Identify Future Improvement e) Review & ensure business processes & software tools to support EPA Consent Decree compliance reporting. Strategy 4: Promote Appropriate Reg standards thru Proactive Gov't Involvement Objective 1: Participate in formation of new laws thru Proactive Involvement with Federal & State Agencies a) Identify and develop State & Federal priorities by September 1st each year. b) Obtain sponsor & identify lobbing partners for new legislation by December 1 each year. c) Educate legislators to achieve legislative agenda. d) Measure success rate of prior fiscal year regulatory goals. Strategy 6: Create a Learning- & Business -Oriented Culture Based on Competency & Accountability Objective 1: Increase Organization Performance thru Succession Planning & Improved Organizational Communication d) Department Directors will have Department -wide staff meeting at least twice a year. Ongoing 123 General Counsel Expenses $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 c $3.0 F. 0 E $2.5 c $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 f $0.0 ay � c� �} kk 2b0 t30 230 20�2 20rd 20791 Personnel k2C0 207 r207 20,2 2010 Tc307 The FY 2012 operating budget of $4.3 million is a decrease This budget reflects no change in the number of of $222 thousand compared to the FY 2011 Forecast. full-time equivalent position allocated to this department. The decrease is related to a reduction in Contractual Services for outside legal services. Projected (Budget ® Forecast OActual 124 General Counsel Department EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast General Counsel District Administration Division $1,742,127 $1,542,267 $2,589,191 $2,592,101 Litigation and Claims Division 1,179,609 1,785,409 1,711,932 1,732,684 General Counsel Division 253,105 245,214 247,814' 191,907 TOTAL EXPENSES $3,174,841 $3,572,891 $4,548,937 $4,516,692 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY General Counsel District Administration Division 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Litigation and Claims Division 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 General Counsel Division 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 7 7 7 7 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 54000 Contractual Services decreased $219,150. associated with lower anticipated cost for outside legal services. FY 2012 Budget $2,593.912 1,527,192 173,284 $4,294,387 2.00 3.00 2.00 7 J FY2013 FY2014 Projected Projected $2,645,549 $2,725,027 1,555,467 1,602,806 175,676 181,097 $4,376,693 $4,508,930 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 7 7 125 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY General Counsel District Administration Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 2007-2008 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $67,321 $59,827 $59,041 $61,951 52000 Supplies 67,389 72,842 69,900 69,900 53000 Usage 301 571 400 400 54000 Contractual Services 1,603,881 1,409,027 2,459,850 2,459,850 55000 Capital Outlay 3,235 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,742,127 $1,542,267 $2,589,191 $2,592,101 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OffidalsfAdminisbative 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Technical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 SkillediCraft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service!Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES This division is responsible for all legal matters involving or affecting the District It provides legal services as requested or required by the Districts Board of Trustees, Executive Director and staff. This function also communicates with federal, state and local officials either through lobbying efforts, attending public meetings and meeting individually* public officials about the benefits of the services provided by MSD and the need to secure additional su000rt FY 2012 Budget $63,762 69,900 400 2,459,850 0 $2,593,912 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 2.00) FY2013 FY2014 Projected Projected $64,796 $66,852 71,298 73,437 408 420 2,509,047 2,584,318 0 0 $2,645,549 $2,725,027 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 126 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay Litigation and Claims Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $429,029 $480,630 $485,532 $506,284 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750,580 1,304,779 1,226,400 1,226,400 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,179,609 $1,785,409 $1,711,932 $1,732,684 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Technical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administralive Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SkilledlCraft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service/Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES This function handles all litigation and claims involving the District. In those instances when the District is represented by outside counsel either assigned by the District's insurance carrier or, as in the rate cases, when the District has chosen outside counsel, this functional area coordinates the work, acts as liaison and generally, actively participates and assists outside counsel in the litigation. FY 2012 Budget $519,942 0 0 1,007,250 0 $1,527,192 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00/ FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Protected $528,072 $544,589 0 0 0 0 1,027,395 1,058,217 0 0 $1,555,467 $1,602,806 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 127 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay General Counsel Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $248,951 $239,513 S240,014 $184,107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,154 5,701 7,800 7,800 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $253,105 $245,214 $247,814 $191,907 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OfficialslAdministra0ve 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Technical 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service/Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS '2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES This function receives referrals of delinquent accounts from the Districts finance Department and thereafter, initiates legal action to enforce collection of delinquent accounts and also collection of any other amounts due the District FY 20121 Budget $165,484 0 0 7,800 0 $173,284 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00/ FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $167,720 $172,902 0 0 0 0 7,956 8,195 0 0 $175,676 $181,097 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 128 Expense Object 51010 51020 51120 51210 Salaries & Wages Overtime Membership & Licensing Fees FICA Taxes 51220 Group Insurance 51230 Pension Contribution 51510 Temporary Help 51990 Accrued Salaries-IncrlDecr Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases 52030 Machinery & Equipment Parts 52090 Electrical Supplies 52220 Janitorial Supplies 52320 Office Supplies 52330 Computer Supplies 52340 Computer Equipment - Non-Capit 52370 Photo & Video Supplies 52380 Publicationsfiraining Supplies 52390 Administrative Supplies Subtotal 52000 Supplies 53060 Electric Usage 53270 Telephone Usage Subtotal 53000 Usage 54010 54050 54060 54080 Postage Office System Services Printing Services Advertising Services METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection General Counsel Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 $ 565,385 $ 592,143 $ 588,852 $ 571,599 11 460 3,000 3,000 4,442 3,180 4,945 4,945 37,637 39,539 39,999 36,880 35,720 35,984 47,999 45,467 91,144 105,474 99,792 110,193 9,310 0 0 0 1,652 3,189 0 (19,742) $ 745,301 $ 779,970 $ 784,587 $ 752,342 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 62 0 0 0 75 19 0 0 0 38 0 0 2,550 2,496 6,100 6,100 418 337 4,500 4,500 0 1,149 0 0 0 218 200 200 63,257 68,039 57,100 57,100 1,027 547 2,000 2,000 $ 67,389 $ 72,842 S 69,900 $ 69,900 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 301 571 400 400 $ 301 $ 571 S 400 $ $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 228 228 5,000 1,171 196 0 0 0 500 Budget FY 2012 S 548,455 3,075 4,945 42,196 50,036 100,481 0 0 $ 749,187 $ 0 0 0 0 6,100 4,500 0 200 57,100 2,000 $ 69,900 $ 400 $ 0 $ 5,000 0 500 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 553,886 $ 570,502 3,106 3,199 5,044 5,195 42,613 43,892 52,837 55,833 103,103 105,722 0 0 0 0 760,589 $ 784,343 0 0 0 0 6,222 4,590 0 204 58,242 2,040 $ 0 0 0 0 6,409 4,728 0 210 59,989 2,101 71,298 $ 73,437 0 $ 0 0 408 420 400 $ 408 $ 420 400 0 $ 5,000 0 500 0 $ 5,100 0 510 0 5,253 0 525 129 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection General Counsel Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast Expense Object FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 54100 Travel Expenses 7,495 8,023 9,500 9,500 54120 Photo Services 9 0 0 0 54140 Training Programs/SeminarFees 4,623 6,364 11,800 11,800 54160 Data Imaging Services 43 27 0 0 54180 Courier And Freight 804 636 4,500 4,500 54190 Property& Other Space Rental 1,408 2,124 1,600 1,600 54350 Lockbox Services 0 11 0 0 54400 Judgments & Claims Settlements 38,656 196,642 200,000 200,000 54420 Court Costs & Lien Fees 1,127 7,906 42,000 42,000 54520 Professional Service 2,303,051 2,497,300 3,419,150 3,419,150 54710 Community Outreach Programs 0 50 0 0 Budget FY 2012 9,500 0 11,800 0 4,500 1,600 0 200,000 42,000 3,200,000 0 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 9,690 9,981 0 0 12,036 12,397 0 0 4,590 4,728 1,632 1,681 0 0 204,000 210,120 42,840 44,125 3,264,000 3,361,920 0 0 Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services $ 2,358,615 $ 2,719,507 $ 3,694,050 S 3.694,050 55010 Land Purchases $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 55090 Furniture & Office Equipment 2,341 0 0 0 55110 Computer Equipment 894 0 0 0 Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay S 3,474.900 S 3,544,398 $ 3,650,730 3,235 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Total General Fund Expenses S 3,174,841 $ 3,572,891 $ 4,548,937 $ 4,516,692 S 0 S 4,294,387 S OS 0 $ 4,376,693 $ 4,508,930 130 Rate Commission Internal Auditor General Counsel Board of Trustees Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer Executive Director Human Resources Finance Information Systems Engineering HUMAN RESOURCES Operations Director of Human Resources Recruiting Training Benefits Diversity Risk Management 131 Human Resources Mission The Human Resources Department is a professional services team supporting a learning and business oriented culture based on accountability, such that we: Assist the District and its employees to enhance skills, performance and work satisfaction • Support the District to achieve the Strategic Business Plan 9 Ensure equal employee treatment and recognition • Ensure equal MWBE access to MSD's procurement of goods and services • Manage the District's loss prevention programs We measure our success by our customer's satisfaction with our performance in accomplishing mutual objectives. Fiscal Year 2011 Accomplishments 1. A new Defined Contribution Plan was designed and implemented to cover all employees hired after December 31, 2010. Employees with less than ten years of service could voluntarily transfer to this Plan from the existing Defined Benefit Plan. The Defined Contribution Plan contains provisions for a District Annual Contribution and Matching Contribution. 2, With the implementation of the Oracle Software, the Payroll function was transferred to Human Resources Department from the Finance Department. 3. As Wellness Programs can mitigate the long-term cost of the Medical Plan, employees and dependents were offered a new Diabetic Health Plan. This plan provides a higher level of benefits for diabetic members if they participate in a series of annual preventative services. 4. With the transition to Maximo Software system, the Training Division trained approximately 650 employees in Engineering Divisions, Operations Department Treatment Plants, Pump Stations, and Collection System on 30 different Maximo topics. 5. The NEOGOV Applicant Tracking System was expanded and improved by training hiring managers to initiate requests, receive and review applicants, develop eligibility lists and make selections online. For professional and managerial positions, jobs were completed averaging 45 days, versus the public sector average of 60 days. 6. We reduced costs significantly in bond and liability insurance, security guard services, and security systems maintenance. 7. The Performance Evaluation forms were revised so that chosen competencies matched the particular group — senior managers, managers, professional and administrative positions. 8. The Human Resources Department designed and implemented Oracle Software modules for HRIS (Human Resource Information System), Benefits Administration, Employee Training & Education Administration, and Payroll Administration. 9. To assist in Performance Management, designed and implemented a new training program entitled "When Performance Doesn't Meet Expectations." 132 Human Resources FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District StrategieslObjectiveslMilestones 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Strategy 1: Educate & Partner with Stakeholders to Build Positive Relationships Objective 3: Achieve Vendor Inclusion Objectives a) Evaluate current MWBE programs & adjust if warranted. b) Hold in-house networking events for MWBE business owners. c) Review "Small Sewer Contractor" opportunity initiative and make adjustments if necessary. d) Initiate MBE business development seminags). e) Select small sewer contract(*) to be coachedlmentored for business growth. f) Implement recommended changes submitted & approved by the BoT. Strategy 2: Manage District's Costs & Revenues to Optimize Financial Performance Objective 2: Implement Cost Savings Initiatives a) Each Department to target top three opportunities for cost reduction & take action to maximize savings. c) Review medical benefit plan for long-term improvements. d) Risk Management to achieve continued loss prevention & cost reduction programs. Strategy 3: Leverage Appropriate Technology to Integrate & improve District Business Processes Objective 1: Analyze Effectiveness of Re -Engineered Business Processes &Identify Future Improvement a) Define & implement metrics to measure improvements from re -engineered business processes. b) Re-visil business case and perform costlbenefit analysis. c) Review organizational impacts of re -engineered processes and implement alignments as needed. d) Identify additional business process changes to improve effectiveness & efficiency of District e) Review & ensure business processes & software tools to support EPA Consent Decree compliance reporting. ■■■■ Strategy 6: Create a Learning- & Business -Oriented Culture Based on Competency & Accountability Objective 1: Increase Organization Performance thru Succession Planning & Improved Organizational Communication a) Identify & prioritize candidates for a Leadership Assessment & Development Plan. b) Create/provide training for the topic °Setting & Communicating Expectations". c) Conduct follow-up training for managers on performance review forms. d) Department Directors will have Department -wide staff meeting at least twice a year. e) Identify 'Critical" positions for future development purposes. Ongoing Objective 2: Increase Individual Performance thru continued Performance Consulting & Training a) Developlconduct training on "Accountability through the Organization". b) Provide performance consulting to Managers as needed. c) Conduct training session "When Performance Doesn't Meet Expectations". d) Developlconducl training on engaging, rewarding and motivating good performers. e) Develop & conduct training on "Asset Management". f) Conduct "Problem Solving" Classes. _ ■ ■ 133 Human Resources Department Expenses $14 -/ 30/ $4 $2 $0 0 ri I I I III II Ty c� T� T� k1 TJ- `'0 �0 �0 �0 `'o 09 70 77 72 7� Ip Personnel 20/ 157 1of 0 k k k k k k c�009 2070 2077 207� �07� `�07p The FY 2012 operating budget of $11.8 million is an increase of The two full-time equivalent positions for Payroll $684 thousand compared to FY 2011 Forecast. Personnel Services were moved from the Finance Department to the increased $417 thousand primarily due to a scheduled wage increase Human Resources Department and one. and associated benefits. Adding to this variance was a $261 thousand Generalist position was added. increase in Contractual Services related to an anticipated increase in Bond and Liability Insurance. 1 Projected I Budget 0 Forecast 0 Actual 134 Human Resources Department EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast Training Division $828,752 $828,370 $1,106,506 $1,112,035 Benefits Division 3.730,714 4.231,901 3,975,194 3,954,191 Recruiting Division 449,462 480,679 517,912 521,351 Diversity Division 255,727 239,421 261,874 270.155 Risk Management Division 5,476,232 4.384,602 5,447,233 5,225.086 TOTAL EXPENSES $10,740,889 $10.164.974 $11,308,719 $11,082.818 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Training Division 5.80 5.80 6.00 6.00 Benefits Division 3.80 3.80 3.00 3.00 Recruiting Division 4.80 4.80 5.00 5.00 Diversity Division 2.80 2.80 2.00 2.00 Risk Management Division 7.80 7.80 8.00 8.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 25 25 24 24 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 51000 Personnel Services increased 5231,397 due to scheduled wage increase along with increased costs in pension and group insurance plan. Other Post Employment Benefits increased 5213.400 due to additional retirees. 54000 Bond & Liability Insurance increased $173.000 due to anticipated rate increase, FY2012 Budget $1,122,196 4,212.634 522,290 264.063 5,645.222 $11,766,405 6.60 3.60 5.60 2.60 8.60 27 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,142.342 $1,177.508 4,412,485 4,584,289 530,874 547,543 268.218 276.512 5,755.030 5,928,615 $12,108.949 $12,514,470 6.60 6.60 3.60 3.60 5.60 5.60 2.60 2.60 8.60 8.60 27 27 135 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance Training Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $644,065 16,611 454 164,163 3,459 $684,987 $834,408 $845,277 12,134 16,390 11,600 390 1,100 1,100 130,184 253,258 253,258 675 1,350 800 $828,752 $828,370 $1,106,506 $1,112,035 1 A0 3.00 020 1.20 0.00 0.00 1.40 3.00 0,20 120 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 5.80 5.80 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES 1 A0 3.00 020 1.40 0.00 0.00 In partnership with all MSD departments, assess and identify organizational readiness to achieve the District's Strategic Business Plan; perform as consultants, coaches, instructional designers, instructors and administrators of programs to achieve successful employee performance; provide professional development through the Educational Assistance Program; develop andfor administer technical and general training programs; and publish the monthly UPDATE newsletter. 6.00 1,40 3.00 0.20 1.40 0.00 0.00 6.00 FY2012� Budget $882,348 $16,490 $1,100 $222,258 $0 $1,122,196 1.40 3.00 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 6.60 J FY2013 FY2014 Projected Projected $897,697 $925,524 16,820 17,324 1,122 1,156 226,703 233,504 0 0 $1,142,342 $1,177,508 1.40 3.00 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 6.60 1.40 3.00 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 6.60 136 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance Benefits Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $3,675,881 $4,169,860 $3,866,938 $3,845,935 5,912 1,608 6,890 6,890 46 15 100 100 48,706 60,418 101,266 101,266 169 0 0 0 $3,730,714 $4,231,901 $3,975,194 $3,954,191 1.40 1.00 0.20 1.20 0.00 0.00 1A0 1.00 020 120 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 3.80 3.80 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES 0.40 1.00 020 1.40 0.00 0.00 Administer and communicate employee benefits programs consistent with Plan documents; ensure properfiscal management of all benefit programs; periodically assess financial risk of plan designs. Responsibilities include group medial, dental, life, ADBD, long-temi disability, vacation, sick leave, compensatory time, benefit related policies, and administration and employee communication for the Pension and Deferred Compensation plans. 3.00 0.40 1.00 0.20 1.40 0.00 0.00 3.00 FY 2012 Budget $4,130,583 6.390 100 75.561 0 $4,212,634 0.40 1.00 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.60J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $4,328,793 $4,498,086 6,518 6,713 102 105 77,072 79,385 0 0 $4,412,485 $4,584,289 0.40 1.00 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 1.00 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.60 3.60 137 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Recruiting Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $393,381 $419,038 $429,001 $441,565 52000 Supplies 19,131 17,183 18,215 14,090 53000 Usage 46 15 100 100 54000 Contractual Services 36,735 43,194 70,596 65,596 55000 Capital Outlay 169 1,249 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $449,462 $480,679 $517,912 $521,351 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OifidalsfAdministrative 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 Professional 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Technical 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Administrative Support 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.40 SkilledfCraft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service/Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 4.80 4.80 5.00 5.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES Provide assistance and guidance to ensure accurate job descriptions; recruit diversified, highly -qualified candidates to fill vacancies in a timely manner, ensure internal job posting system considers qualified employees for promotional opportunities; ensure compensation practices are consistent with Civil Service regulations; and ensure all District policies and Human Resource practices foster and support positive employee relations. FY 2012 Budget $472,704 15,590 100 33,896 0 $522,290 1.40 2.00 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 5.60 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $480,296 $495,449 15,902 16,378 102 105 34,574 35,611 0 0 $530,874 $547,543 1.40 1.40 2.00 2.00 0.20 0.20 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.60 5.60 138 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Diversity Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $245,120 $229,090 $211,120 $219,401 52000 Supplies 880 221 1,290 1,290 53000 Usage 46 15 100 100 54000 Contractual Services 9,512 10,095 49,364 49.364 55000 Capital Outlay 169 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $255,727 $239,421 $261,874 $270.155 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OfficialslAdministrative 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Technical 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Administrative Support 1.20 1.20 0.40 0.40 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ServicelMaintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 2.80 2.80 2.00 2.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES Develop and administer policies, procedures and programs designed to support on -going improvement of the District's commitment to inclusion in all its activities, and communicates these ideals to intemal personnel and external stakeholders. For internal personnel, services provided are administering and maintaining creation of Equal Employment and Affirmative Action practices and policies; and adherence to the District's minority and women business utilization objectives as applicable in contracting and purchasing transactions. For external stakeholders, comprised of minority and women business owners, services provided are beginning -to -end review of all applicable projects and purchase orders for contract goal compliance, the use of effective sourcing techniques, encouragement of inter -business referrals, community outreach, and timely expenditure reporting. FY 2012 Budget $244,309 1,290 100 18,364 0 $264,063 1.40 0.00 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.00 2.60 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $248,069 $255,759 1,316 1,355 102 105 18,731 19,293 0 0 $268,218 $276,512 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.60 2.60 139 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Risk Management Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $1,087,552 $936,309 $1,259,327 $1,276,189 52000 Supplies 14,373 17,993 17,130 17,130 53000 Usage 2,613 2,625 2,900 2,900 54000 Contractual Services 4,369,054 3,425,438 4,164,676 3,925,667 55000 Capital Outlay 2,640 2,237 3,200 3,200 TOTAL EXPENSES $5,476,232 $4,384,602 $5,447,233 $5,225,086 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 1.40 1.40 1,40 1.40 Professional 5.00 5,00 5,00 5.00 Technical 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Administrative Support 1.20 1.20 1.40 1 A0 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service/Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 7.80 7.80 8.00 8.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES Develop and administer polities, procedures and programs designed to protect the District's assets by educating, motivating, and training personnel in positive safety practices and programs thus preventing losses from accidents, injuries, and lost time. Seoond, identify all types of bss exposures the District may encounter:safety, security, emergency response, business interruption, etc., and then define a strategy to manage each. Third, manage the Districts Water Backup Overcharged Line Program and Dispute Resolution Board for Water Backup Program. Manage all third party claim administrative fundions. Lastly, continuously educate management on the cost of losses through thorough and timely reports. FY 2012 Budget $1,315,386 17,130 2.900 4,306,606 3,200 $5,645,222 1.40 5.00 0.20 2.00 0.00 0.00 8.60 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,338,597 $1,379,690 17,473 17,996 2,958 3,047 4,392,738 4,524,520 3264 3,362 $5,755,030 $5,928,615 1.40 1.40 5.00 5.00 0.20 0.20 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 8.60 8.60 140 Expense Obiect 51010 Salaries & Wages 51020 Overtime 51030 Compensatory Pay Accrual 51040 Sick Leave Accrual 51050 Vacation Accrual 51080 Floating Holiday Accrual 51100 Emp Service & Incentive Awards 51110 Workers' Comp Settlements 51120 Membership & Licensing Fees 51130 Education Assistance Program 51210 FICATaxes 51220 Group Insurance 51230 Pension Contribution 51234 EAP 51240 Unemployment Insurance 51250 Second Injury Insurance/Tax 51300 Other Post Employment Benefits 51990 Accrued Salaries-IncriDecr Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubricanls,Gases 52040 Machinery & Equipment - Non -Ca 52090 Electrical Supplies 52170 Safety Supplies 52240 Hand Tools 52280 Uniforms 52300 Safety Footwear 52310 TelephonelCammunicEquiplSuppl 52320 Office Supplies 52330 Computer Supplies METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Human Resources Department Actual FY 2009 $ 1,508,228 3,859 30,811 825,984 643,700 12,827 55,006 413,308 11,751 156,682 153,896 146,789 243,139 0 19,647 62,485 1,749,024 1 8,864 Actual FY 2010 $ 1,566,551 $ 20,206 32,8% 840,300 747,782 35,215 50,098 204,220 13,588 168,493 174,075 626,999 279,038 0 23,455 85,379 1,562,131 8,857 Budget Forecast FY 2011 FY 2011 1,522,368 $ 1,604,633 19,500 25,850 48,000 (12,666) 825,000 860,885 600,000 564,738 24,000 (11,095) 57,269 57,269 480,000 480,000 17,330 15,454 301,000 300,000 165,245 166,359 743,298 809,286 266,184 303,590 0 0 30,000 16,433 120,000 120,000 1,381,600 1,381,600 0 (53,969) Budget FY 2012 $ 1,620,966 5,894 40,000 850,000 600,000 24,000 55,255 480,000 15,690 301,000 123,093 829,490 339,718 15,225 30,000 120,000 1,595,000 0 Projected Projected FY2013 FY2014 $ 1,637,015 $ 1,686,125 5,953 6,132 40,000 40,000 850,000 850,000 600,000 600,000 24,000 24,000 55,808 56,366 489,600 504,288 16,004 16,484 307,020 316,231 124,298 128,027 878,522 930,589 348,585 357,439 15,530 15,995 30,600 31,518 122,400 126,072 1,748,120 1,865,244 0 0 $ 6,046,000 $ 6,439,283 $ 6,600,794 $ 6,628,367 $ 7,045,330 $ 7,293,452 $ 7,554,509 $ 0$ 0 809 1,479 0 60 799 236 7,675 11,123 15 $ 1,438 156 2,115 84 59 922 168 3,229 10,747 0$ 0 50 3,800 0 80 1,200 100 11,345 13,000 0 0 50 3,800 0 80 1,200 0 10,220 13,110 $ 0 0 50 3,800 0 80 1,200 0 9,720 13,200 $ 0$ 0 0 0 51 53 3,876 3,992 0 0 82 84 1,224 1,261 0 0 9,914 10,212 13,464 13,868 141 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Human Resources Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast Expense Object FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 52340 Computer Equipment - Non-Capit 0 1,249 0 0 52370 Photo &Video Supplies 4,407 6,320 2,100 2,100 52380 Publications/Training Supplies 20,888 16,990 17,680 12,580 52390 Administrative Supplies 9,431 5,647 10,560 7,860 Subtotal 51000 Supplies $ 56,907 $ 49,138 $ 59,915 $ 51,000 53060 Electric Usage 53270 Telephone Usage Subtotal 53000 Usage $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 3,204 3,061 4,300 4,300 $ 3,204 $ 3,061 $ 4,300 $ 4,300 54010 Postage $ 0 $ 0 $ 200 $ 200 54050 Office System Services 2,762 1,974 3,880 3,880 54060 Printing Services 2,209 1,696 2,500 2,500 54080 Advertising Services 30,831 15,965 27,000 22,000 54100 Travel Expenses 10,659 8,420 13,012 13,012 54130 Bond & Liability Insurance 2,746,119 3,077,592 2,835,351 2,835,351 54140 Training Programs/SeminarFees 184,546 138,212 215,150 215,150 54160 Data Imaging Services 3,711 2,968 5,400 5,400 54180 Courier And Freight 808 657 1,118 1,118 54190 Property & Other Space Rental 1,681 2,606 3,300 3,300 54390 Hospital & Medical Services 386,991 524,766 565,709 565,709 54400 Judgments & Claims Settlements 447,603 347,017 380,000 130,000 54410 Judgments & Claims Accrual 405,272 (1,341,855) 0 10,991 54520 Professional Service 297,544 352,161 511,760 511,760 54530 Building Repairs & Services 37,003 79,323 67,080 67,080 54650 Waste Hauling 0 29 0 0 54690 Safety Services 6,494 5,425 5,600 5,600 54710 Community Outreach Programs 0 0 2,100 2,100 54800 Worker Comp Accrual 63,938 452,376 0 0 Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services $ 4,628,171 $ 3,669,332 $ 4,639,160 $ 4,395,151 Budget FY 2012 0 2,100 17,080 9,660 $ 56,890 $ 0 4,300 $ 4,300 $ 200 4,305 2,500 22,000 16,312 3,008,281 215,300 5,400 1,118 3,300 564,929 380,000 0 358,260 67,080 0 5,600 2,100 0 $ 4.656,685 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 0 0 2,142 2,206 17,422 17,944 9,853 10,149 58,028 $ 59,769 0 0 4,386 4,518 4,386 $ 4,518 204 $ 210 4,391 4,523 2,550 2,626 22,440 23,113 16,638 17,137 3,068,447 3,160,500 219,606 226,194 5,508 5,673 1,140 1,175 3,366 3,467 576,228 593,514 387,600 399,228 0 0 365,425 376,388 68,422 70,474 0 0 5,712 5,883 2,142 2,206 0 0 $ 4,749,819 $ 4,892,313 142 Expense Object METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Human Resources Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 55010 Land Purchases $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 55080 Instruments & Apparatus 2,920 2,044 1,500 1,500 55110 Computer Equipment 3,687 2,117 3,050 2,500 Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay $ 6,607 $ 4,161 $ 4,550 $ 4,000 Total General Fund Expenses $ 10,740,889 $ 10,164,974 $ 11,308,719 $ 11,082,818 Budget FY 2012 $ 0 1,500 1,700 S 3,200 S 11,766,405 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 0 $ 0 1,530 1,576 1,734 1,786 $ 3,264 $ 3,362 $ 12,108,949 $ 12,514,470 143 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 144 Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer Rate Commission Intemal Auditor Board of Trustees Executive Director General Counsel Information Systems FINANCE Operations Director of Finance Accounting Purchasing Accounts Receivable 145 Finance Mission Manage the District's costs and revenues to improve financial performance. Fiscal Year 2011 Accomplishments 1. Successfully participated in the District's Enterprise System Retooling Project resulting in implementation of the Oracle Payroll and Time Reporting modules. 2. Received the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) award for Distinguished Budget Presentation for the 24th consecutive year. 3. Received the GFOA award for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the 23`d consecutive year. 4. Collected $20.7M in delinquent sewer service charges. 5. Maintained an average Call Center customer approval rating of 84%. 6. Delivered a Wastewater Rate Proposal for FY13 through FY16 to the District's Rate Commission for review and approval. 7. Successfully implemented Collection Remediation Plan to more aggressively pursue the District's $78M delinquency portfolio. 8. Expanded Low Income Assistance Program to include tenants and multi -unit property. 9. Reduced unaccounted invoices, improving the accuracy of month -end expense numbers. 10.Implemented segmented financial accounting and statements to meet external reporting requirements. 11.Increased the dollars spent competitively from 92% to 99% within a 6 month timeframe. 146 Finance FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District Strategies/Objectives!Milestones 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul I Aug Sep Oct Novl Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Strategy 1: Educate & Partner with Stakeholders to Build Positive Relationships Objective 3: Achieve Vendor Inclusion Objectives h) Hold in-house networking events for MWBE business owners. Strategy 2: Manage District's Costs & Revenues to Optimize Financial Performance Objective 1: Increase Collections on Operational Revenue a) Complete implementation of comprehensive collection procedures to address long-standing delinquencies. b) Increase customer participation in the expanded Low Inoome Program. c) Prepare accurate & timely month -end financial statements by 14th business day of each month. -- _..■ Objective Implement Cost Savings Initiatives a) Each Departrnent to target top three opportunities for cost reduction &take action to maximize savings. b) Optimize the District's purchasing operation to reduce costs, decrease internal delivery times & focus on use of MWBE consultants and contractors. Objective 3; Improve Long Term Financing Plans for District Needs a) Review status of CIRP supporting revenue and revise capital projects on an on -going basis. b) Adjust multi -decade financing plan to support LT CIRP Program & regulatory requirements in response to EPA mediation. ---_ Strategy 3: Leverage Appropriate Technology to Integrate & Improve District Business Processes Objective 1: Analyze Effectiveness of Re -Engineered Business Processes &Identify Future Improvement a) Define & implement metrics to measure improvements from re -engineered business processes. b) Re -visit business case and perform costlbenefil analysis. c) Review organizational impacts of re -engineered processes and implement alignments as needed. d) Identify additional business process changes to improve effectiveness & efficiency of District. e) Review & ensure business processes & software tools to'support EPA Consent Decree compliance reporting. ■■.■ Objective 3: Perform Evaluation &Develop Recommendation for Re -Engineering of CIS (BillinglCollections) Business Process a) Document current business processes and business needs. b) Identify industry -standard software solutions that utite best management practices. c) Perform benefiticost analysis of identified software and make recommendation. d) Develop plan to support software implementation if approved. -. Strategy 5: Address Customer Service Levels Needs & Reg Required thru Comprehensive Asset Mgmt Program. Objective 1: Improve customer service levels a) Develop & implement strategies to maintain overall Post Contact Survey to 80%. Strategy 6: Create a Learning- & Business -Oriented Culture Based on Competency & Accountability Objective 1: Increase Organization Performance thru Succession Planning & Improved Organizational Communication d) Deparbnent Directors will have Department -wide staff meeting at least twice a year. Ongoing 147 $18 f $16 f $14 $12 f CO g $10 $4 -1 $2 -7 $0 Finance Department Expenses *} kJ- '9- `) 1h- 1000 1)07 2'07 Q07 1507 207 FY 2012 operating budget of $16.7 million represents an overall increase of $343,487 over FY 2011 forecast. Increases related to Personnel Services and Contractural Services and decreases in Capital Outlay resulted in the net increase. Personnel 70f 601 50/ 40f 0 0 a x). '`)- 2oa9°'o°'�°'2 c°'a This budget reflects one fewer full time employee position; the result of tranferring 2 Payroll positions from Accounting to the Human Resources Deparbnent and adding an Assistant Buyer to Purchasing. 1Projected 'Budget 9Forecast t]Actual 148 Finance Department EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast Accounting Division 1,450,819 1,567,771 1,660,507 1,541,897 Purchasing Division 2,081,937 1,966,657 2,465,373 2,404,315 Accounts Receivable Division 13,636,765 11,981,886 12,845,356 12,400,019 TOTAL EXPENSES $17,169,526 $15,516,314 $16,971,237 $16,346,231 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Accounting Division 18.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 Purchasing Division 12.00 12.00 10.00 10.00 Accounts Receivable Divison 40.00 40.00 34.00 34.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 70 70 64 64 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 51000 Personnel Services overall decrease of $21,556 comprised of a decrease of $122,369 in Temporary Help and increases in Salary 8 Wages and Pension Contribution. 54000 Postage decreased $373,145 related to fewer sewer service accounts billed along with an increased participation in electronic billing. Collection Services decreased $205,264 based on an anticipated reduction in commission paid to collection agencies on delinquent accounts. Offsetting these decreases was a $356,618 increase in Court Cost 8 Liens associated with an anticipated increase in tiling of liens and legal pursuit of delinquent customers. 55000 Structural Improvements decreased S178,000 due to roof repair costs budgeted in FY 2011. i FY 2012\ Budget 1,608,993 2,356,514 12,724,210 $16,689,718 18.00 12.00 33.00 63� FY2013 FY2014 Projected Projected 1,643,598 1,696,300 2,407,237 2,497,911 12,968,126 13,362,277 $17,018,961 $17,556,488 18.00 18.00 12.00 12.00 33.00 33.00 63 63 149 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Accounting Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $1,412,332 $1,502,616 $1,536,264 $1,463,643 52000 Supplies 9,834 9,463 12,532 11,715 53000 Usage 115 270 480 640 54000 Contractual Services 25,290 55,423 111,232 65,899 55000 Capital Outlay 3,248 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,450,819 $1,567,771 $1,660,507 $1,541,897 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 3.67 2.67 3.67 3.67 Professional 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Technical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 7.33 7.33 8.33 8.33 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service/Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 18.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Accounting function ensures that Distrid payments and receipts are properly authorized, recorded and reported in accordance with Dishict policy and generally accepted accounting principles, It also provides periodic financial reports reflecting the District's current financial position. This division annually prepares the Districts Operating Budget, Debt Service and Capital Improvement & Replace- ment Program. FY 2012 Budget $1,453,804 16,872 480 137,838 0 $1,608,993 3.67 6.33 0.00 8.00 0,00 0.00 18.00 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,485,305 $1,533,258 17,209 17,725 490 504 140,594 144,813 0 0 $1,643,598 $1,696,300 3.67 3.67 6.33 6.33 0.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.00 18.00 150 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance Purchasing Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $858,623 $915,630 $827,901 $805,665 85,462 100,917 88,823 88,096 183,368 193,988 246,160 245,900 882,980 746,310 1,088,990 1,051,154 71,505 9,813 213,500 213,500 $2,081,938 $1,966,657 $2,465,373 $2,404,315 2.67 2.00 3.00 4.33 0.00 0.00 2.67 2,00 3,00 4.33 0.00 0.00 2.67 1.00 3.00 3.33 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 12.00 12.00 10.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Purchasing Division is responsible for contracting all of the supplies, materials, equipment, construction repairs, professional services, and improvement construction projects required by the District. Through competitive bidding procedures this division ensures a properly authorized supply of goods and services. The Division is responsible for the timely disposal of property and equipment that has been declared surplus to the Districts needs. The Central Services element of the Purchasing Division is responsible for mail distribution throughout the District and the management of the headquarters building. 2.67 1.00 3.00 3.33 0.00 0.00 10.00 FY 2012 Budget $871,005 88,223 245,380 1,086,407 65,500 $2,356,514 2.67 1,33 3,00 5,00 0.00 0.00 12.00J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $885,072 $913,065 89,987 92,687 257,233 281,965 1,108,135 1,141,380 66,810 68,814 $2,407,237 $2,497,911 2.67 1.33 3.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 2.67 1.33 3.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 12.00 151 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay Accounts Receivable Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2911 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $2,554,876 $2,589,089 $2,171,606 $2,131,370 4,790 8,123 17,048 15,758 0 0 0 0 11,076,559 9,384,077 10,653,303 10,249.491 544 598 3,400 3,400 TOTAL EXPENSES $13,636,767 $11,981,886 S12,845,356 $12,400,019 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skillegraft ServicelMaintenance 5.67 0.00 0.00 34.33 0.00 ,0.00 5.67 0.33 0.00 33.33 0.00 0.00 4.67 1.00 0.00 28.33 0.00 0.00 4.67 1.00 0.00 28.33 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 40.00 39.33 34.00 34.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES This division maintains an account receivable record for each of the Districts 434,000 customers. The user charge billing ensures a predictable flow of cash necessary to operate, maintain and replace the wastewater and slormwater facilities. This division also provides to the Districts customers pleasant and efficient assistance with regard to monthly user charge billings. This division collects all payments and enforces the user charge ordinances as they pertain to non-payment of user charges. This is accomplished through three remedies: by suit andlor lien against the property served, use of outside collection agencies and by termination of service when possible. FY 2012 Budget S2,189.406 16.950 0 10,514,455 3,400 $12,724,210 3.67 0.67 0.00 28.67 0.00 0,00 33.00} FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $2,222,625 $2,294,411 17,289 17,807 0 0 10,724,744 11,046,487 3,468 3,572 $12,968,126 $13,362,277 3.67 0.33 0.00 29,00 0.00 0.00 3.67 0.33 0.00 29.00 0.00 0.00 33.00 33.00 152 Expense Object 51010 Salanes & Wages 51020 Overtime 51120 Membership & Licensing Fees 51210 FICA Taxes 51220 Group Insurance 51230 Pension Contribution 51510 Temporary Help 51990 Accrued Salaries-IncrlDecr Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases 52020 Motor Vehicle Parts & Equip 52030 Machinery & Equipment Parts 52050 Construction & Bldg Supplies 52070 Hardware 52090 Electrical Supplies 52100 Instrument Supplies 52110 Chemical Supplies 52150 Plumbing Supplies 52160 Paint Supplies 52170 Safety Supplies 52220 Janitorial Supplies 52240 Hand Tools 52280 Uniforms 52300 Safety Footwear 52310 TelephonelCommunic EquiplSuppl 52320 Office Supplies 52330 Computer Supplies 52340 Computer Equipment - Non-Capb 52360 Grounds Supplies METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Finance Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 $ 3,027,691 $ 3,185,874 $ 3,114,372 $ 3,111,048 165,913 153,022 36,984 34,676 3,673 4,129 4,193 3,463 233,285 241,010 242,687 233,066 362,648 346,424 443,281 423,156 488,100 567,476 571,884 593,937 526,859 490,750 122,369 111,389 17,661 18,647 0 (110,057) Budget FY 2012 S 3,140,506 25,440 4,848 240,409 453,756 649,256 0 0 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 3,170,840 $ 3,265,965 25,695 26,466 4,945 5,093 245,894 253,271 479,426 506,816 666,202 683,123 0 0 0 0 $ 4,825,830 $ 5,007,333 $ 4,535,770 $ 4,400,678 S 4,514,214 $ 4,593,002 $ 4,740,735 $ 0$ 0 1,553 1,872 170 4,612 4,457 0 473 0 92 24,128 302 688 1,000 2,710 45,046 1,489 0 2,680 0$ 1,595 241 1,600 718 3,535 0 3,982 1,477 11 1,893 40,928 53 1,039 796 502 44,403 4,471 0 532 0 0 0 0 300 3,525 0 0 1,800 0 0 36,000 0 1,736 1,430 0 61,960 1,570 0 1,050 $ 0 0 0 0 300 3,525 0 0 1,800 0 0 36,000 0 1,736 1,230 0 60,196 1,370 1,600 1,050 $ 0 0 0 0 300 3,525 0 0 1,800 0 0 36,000 0 1,736 830 0 62,500 1,570 4,800 1,050 $ 0 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 306 315 3,596 3,703 0 0 0 0 1,836 1,891 0 0 0 0 36,720 37,822 0 0 1,771 1,824 847 872 0 0 63,750 65,662 1,601 1,649 4,896 5,043 1,071 1,103 153 Expense Object 52380 Publicationsfiraining Supplies 52390 Administrative Supplies Subtotal 52000 Supplies 53060 Electric Usage 53080 Water Usage 53270 Telephone Usage Subtotal 53000 Usage 54010 Postage 54050 Office System Services 54060 Printing Services 54080 Advertising Services 54100 Travel Expenses 54140 Training Programs1Seminar Fees 54160 Data Imaging Services 54180 Courier And Freight 54190 Property & Other Space Rental 54350 Lockbox Services 54400 Judgments & Claims Settlements 54420 Court Costs & Lien Fees 54450 Collection Services 54470 Water Agency Data Services 54520 Professional Service 54530 Building Repairs & Services 54540 Janitorial Services 54550 Grounds Services 54570 Machinery & Equipment Services 54600 Electrical Repair Services 54620 Plumbing Services METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Finance Department Actual Actual FY 2009 FY 2010 4,174 5,452 4,639 5,274 Budget FY 2011 3,646 5,385 Forecast FY 2011 2,475 4,287 Budget FY 2012 2,548 5,385 $ 100,087 $ 118,502 $ $ 174,802 $ 186,035 $ 3,964 3,230 4,717 4,994 $ 183,483 $ 194,258 $ $ 1,631,070 37,145 438,251 73,777 7,874 9,728 6,587 12,043 18,263 698,800 44 485,941 3,938,362 490,081 3,597,582 349,579 111,423 20,157 11,568 15,667 5,130 $ 1,441,789 29,542 317,462 69,398 1,792 5,884 6,924 3,312 22,154 733,028 0 (94,439) 3,069,629 492,240 3,545,484 304,330 136,215 17,939 6,513 10,354 9,472 118,402 S 115,569 231,500 $ 231,500 10,400 10,400 4,740 4,640 $ 122,044 $ 231,500 10,400 3,960 $ $ Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 2,599 2,677 5,493 5,657 124,485 $ 128,219 243,075 10,608 4,039 267,383 10,926 4,160 246,640 $ 246,540 $ $ 1,889,245 $ 15,910 358,506 97,500 7,138 12,690 12,210 27,720 19,303 678,845 0 368,116 4,058,824 482,520 3,247,157 339,636 146,700 24,725 4,600 7,500 5,000 1,510,421 15,635 320,538 97,500 4,162 9,425 12,210 27,470 17,498 674,213 0 353,297 3,946,563 492,240 3,307,531 339,636 146,700 24,725 4,600 7,500 5,000 245,860 $ $ 1,516,100 15,285 302,481 122,500 5,764 11,315 12,210 28,920 20,935 708,672 0 724,734 3,853,560 492,240 3,346,292 339,636 144,900 26,376 4,600 7,500 5,000 257,722 $ 282,469 1,546,422 15,591 308,531 124,950 5,879 11,541 12,454 29,498 21,354 722,845 0 739,229 3,930,631 502,085 3,413,218 346,429 147,798 26,904 4,692 7,650 5,100 $ 1,592,815 16,058 317,787 128,698 6,056 11, 12,828 30,383 21,994 744,531 0 761,406 4,0413,550 517,147 3,515,614 356,822 152,232 27,711 4,833 7,880 5,253 154 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Finance Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast Expense Object FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 54630 HVAC Services 18,526 53,336 42,000 42,000 54650 Waste Hauling 6,881 1,902 7,680 7,680 54670 Other Governmental Fees 350 125 0 0 54690 Safety Services 0 1,426 0 0 Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services $ 11,984,828 $ 10,185,810 $ 11,853,525 $ 11,366,544 55010 Land Purchases $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 55030 Structural Improvements 52,200 0 200,000 200,000 55080 Instruments & Apparatus 0 0 0 0 55090 Furniture & Office Equipment (146) 8,978 13,400 13,400 55110 Computer Equipment 23,243 1,433 3,500 3,500 Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay $ 75,297 $ 10,411 $ 216,900 $ 216,900 Budget FY 2012 42,000 7,680 0 0 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 42,840 44,125 7,834 8,069 0 0 0 0 $ 11,738,700 $ 0 52,000 6,000 7,400 3,500 $ 11,973,474 $ 12,332,678 $ 0 $ 0 53,040 54,631 6,120 6,304 7,548 7,774 3,570 3,677 Total General Fund Expenses $ 17,169,526 $ 15,516,314 $ 16,971,237 $ 16,346,231 S 68.900 S 16,689,718 $ 70,278 $ 72,386 $ 17,018,961 $ 17,556,488 155 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 156 Human Resources Rate Commission Internal Auditor General Counsel Finance Board of Trustees Civil Service Commission i Secretary -Treasurer I Executive Director Information Systems Engineering INFORMATION SYSTEMS Operations Director of Information Systems ES Retooling Business Application Technical Integration Services Services 157 Information Systems Mission We, as a customer -service department, will continue to lead the District in the implementation of business processes and information technology that will assist the District in providing the highest quality services in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible. The priority is placed on making it easier for residents, businesses and community agencies to "do business" with the District through improved business processes and the effective use of information technology, Fiscal Year 2011 Accomplishments 1. Implemented the Oracle Enterprise Business System in support of the District's re -engineered business processes (i.e. HR/Payroll, Financials, Cash Management, Project Management and Procurement). Data warehousing and reporting software was also implemented to support reporting needs at both an enterprise and individual department level. Critical components of the implementation included a formal training program delivered to all employees as well as an enterprise change management initiative. The project was implemented under budget and on the prescribed timeline. 2. Successfully deployed a new vendor -developed software tool (eLab) to support the District's Division of Environmental Compliance laboratory operations. This tool replaced an aging, client -based software application with a web -based application that enables the user community to take advantage of many features (e.g. workload management, workflow, scheduling, instrument interfacing, etc.) that bring efficiency to the laboratory environment. 3. The final phase of the ES Retooling program encompassed the transition of the collections system operations and engineering groups to the enhanced Maximo 7.1 system. With this migration, the District's asset and work order management business processes are now supported from one system. An important challenge facing the District in the upcoming years will be to ensure that its business processes and performance meet all EPA Consent Decree requirements. Integrity in the asset data that the District collects and maintains is a critical component of compliance and the new Maximo system enforces data integrity. The Maximo system will be the source for satisfying the reporting requirements associated with the Consent Decree particularly ensuring that the District's work is prioritized to meet the schedules laid out in the Consent Decree. The system also has new features such as spatially enabled assets that will allow the Operations and Engineering Departments to work more efficiently in serving the District's stakeholders. 4. Implemented enabling technology infrastructure initiatives that introduced operating efficiencies and/or were building blocks for future initiatives. Significant projects implemented during the past fiscal year include the Microsoft Exchange Service 2010 upgrade and the employee self-service password management tool. Both projects were implemented per prescribed timelines and met stated objectives. 158 Information Systems FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District Strategiesl0bjectiveslMilestones 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Strategy 3: Leverage Appropriate Technology to Integrate & improve District Business Processes Objective 1: Analyze Effectiveness of Re -Engineered Business Processes & Identify Future Improvement a) Define & implement metrics to measure improvements from re -engineered business processes. b) Re -visit business case and perform cost/benefit analysis. c) Review organizational impacts of re -engineered processes -implement alignments as needed. d) Identify additional business process changes to improve effectiveness & efficiency of District. e) Review & ensure business processes & software tools to support EPA Consent Decree compliance reporting. Objective 2: Perform Evaluation & Develop Recommendation for Re -Engineering of Development ReviewlPermitting Business Process a) Document current business processes and business needs. b) Identify industry -standard software solutions that utilize best management practices. c) Perform benefit/cost analysis of identified software and make recommendation. d) Develop plan to support software implementation if approved. -- -. Objective 3: Perform Evaluation & Develop Recommendation for Re -Engineering of CIS Business Process a) Document current business processes and business needs. b) Identify industry -standard software solutions that utilize best management practices. c) Perform benefiticost analysis of identified software and make recommendation. d) Develop plan to support software implementation if approved. Strategy 6: Create a Learning- & Business -Oriented Culture Based on Competency & Accountability Objective 1: Increase Organization Performance thru Succession Planning & Improved Organizational Communication d) Department Directors will have Department -wide staff meeting at least twice a year. Ongoing 159 $12 $10 $6 E $2 $0 Information Systems Department Expenses TF k k k �} k % 2070 2Q77 '72 2070 2O7,p Personnel k k k k k k 26'0 20 2�2 c'o cD0 The FY 2012 operating budget of $10.8 million represents an This budget reflects the addition of four (4) increase of $719 thousand from the FY 2011 forecast. This Senior Business Analyst to support the Oracle increase is comprised of increases in Personnel Services, system. Supplies and Contractual Services. 1Projected 'Budget ®Forecast OActual 160 Information Systems Department EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast Business Integration Division $1,994,192 $2,161,093 $2,091,332 $2 122 759 ES Retooling 1,228,965 1,810,730 1,446,500 1,446,500 Application Services Division 2,223,640 3,564,027 3,341,734 3,356,652 Technical Services Division 3,800,304 3,325,192 3,198,369 3,201,691 TOTAL EXPENSES $9247,100 $10,861,043 $10,077,934 $10,127,601 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Business Integration Division 13.67 13.67 12,67 12.67 Application Services Division 12.67 12,67 11.67 11.67 Technical Services Division 15.67 15.67 14.67 14.67 TOTAL POSMONS 42.00 42.00 39.00 39.00 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 51000 Personnel Services increased $504,477. This increase is primarily related to scheduled salary and other related benefit increases along with the addition of four Senior Program Analyst to support Oracle System applications. 52000 Supplies increased $136,796 primarily related to an increase in Computer Equipment -Non Capital needed due to the implemenation of Maximo Work Order Management System. 54000 Contractual Services increased $253,957. This increase is primarily attributed to increases in Professional Services and Office System Services related to maintenance costs for Oracle, Maximo and GIS systems. FY 2012 Budget $2,417,170 1,269,020 3,696,663 3,463,740 $10,846,593 16.00 12.00 15.00 43.00 FY2013 FY2014 Projected Projected $2,456,846 $2,532,724 1,294,400 1,333,233 3,612,732 3,723,846 3,526,400 3,633,918 $10,890,379 $11,223,720 16.00 16.00 12.00 12.00 15.00 15.00 43.00 43.00 161 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY ES Retooling FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $161,793 $1,502,833 $1,400,000 $1,420,000 52000 Supplies 178,717 286,171 1,500 1,500 53000 Usage 0 0 0 0 54000 Contractual Services 797,272 20,000 45,000 25,000 55000 Capital Outlay 91,183 1,726 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,228,965 $1,810,730 $1,446,500 $1,446,500 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 0 0 0 0 Professional 0 0 0 0 Technical 0 0 0 0 Administrative Support 0 0 0 0 Skilled/Craft 0 0 0 0 Service/Maintenance 0 0 0 0 TOTAL POSITIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The ES Retooling team was developed from existing MSD employees to assist in the development and transition to a new comprehensive enterprise data system. All employees are still allocated to their home departments. FY 2012 Budget $1,240,920 1,500 0 26,600 0 $1,269.020 0 0 0 0 0 0 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,265,738 $1,303,711 1,530 1,576 0 0 27,132 27,946 0 0 $1,294,400 $1,333,233 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 162 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Sk lled1Craft Service/Maintenance Business Integration Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $1,972,293 $2,134,855 $2,054,012 $2,088,039 2,179 3,205 8,433 5,833 1,219 2,452 3,720 3,720 12,998 19,559 19,167 19,167 5,503 1,022 6,000 6,000 $1,994,192 $2,161,093 $2,091,332 $2122,759 7.33 6.00 0,00 0,33 0,00 0.00 7.33 6.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 1.33 11.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 1.33 11.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 13.67 13.67 12.67 12.67 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Business Integration team understands MSD's strategies and business processes in order to align the customer needs and requirements with the Deparbnenfs need to deliver end -to -end IS services. Ensures that systems perform reliably and verifiably in terms of business needs and requirements. Develops and manages the IS technology program ensuring that initiatives and projects deliver on the value of the supporting business case. Assists in the re - engineering of major business processes including the management of technology projects which contribute to MSD achieving its strategy of operational effectiveness. The Business Integration team works with cross -divisional teams to ensure the successful delivery of projects and implementation of business processes. FY 2012 Budget $2,379,850 8,433 3,720 19,167 6,000 $2,417,170 1.67 14.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 16.00� FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Proiected $2,418,780 $2,493,515 8,602 8,860 3,794 3,908 19,550 20,137 6,120 6,304 $2,456,846 $2,532,724 1.67 14.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 1.67 14.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 16.00 16.00 163 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OfficialslAdministrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance Application Services Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $1,603,519 6,548 744 602,510 10,319 $2,223,640 1.33 9.00 2.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 $1.938,991 7,533 1,957 1,612,693 2,853 $1,747,188 2,033 2,000 1,584,513 6,000 $1,812,106 2,033 3,000 1.533,513 6,000 $3,564,027 $3,341,734 $3,356.652 1.33 9.00 2.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 12.67 12.67 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES 2.33 9.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 The Application Services team provides technical solutions that are sustainable, supportable and meet customedbusiness requirements. Working closely with intemal and external business partners, Application Services uses business input and requirements in order to design, develop and support MSD's business application portfolio. The Application Services team evaluates third party applications and technology in order to determine business fit and integration with the existing business application portfolio. 2.33 9.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 11.67 11.67 FY 2012 Budget S1,982.133 1.833 2,280 1,704,417 6.000 $3,696.663 1.67 10.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 12.00 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Proiected Proiected $2,016,911 1,870 2,326 1,585,505 6,120 $2,080,150 1,926 2,395 1,633,071 6,304 $3,612,732 $3,723,846 1.67 10.00 0.00 0,33 0.00 0.00 1.67 10.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 12,00 12.00 164 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft ServicelMaintenance Technical Services Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget FY2011 ( FY2012h FY2013 FY2014 Forecast Budget Projected Projected $1,649,545 $1,827,862 $1,729,011 $1,927,888 173,482 158,402 141,036 83,586 495,162 445,700 496,876 496,876 921,804 667,318 601,166 578,681 560,311 225,910 230,280 114,660 $3,800,304 $3,325,192 $3,198,369 $3,201,691 2.33 9.00 4.00 0.33 0 0 2.33 9.00 4,00 0.33 0 0 TOTAL POSITIONS 15.67 15.67 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Technical Services team manages the Districts enterprise technology infrastructure including network, server, storage, computer operations and desktop/end user services. The Technical Services team works with other divisional groups to develop technology solutions that are cost effective, secure and align with the District's strategic direction. The team manages all computer operations, data communications, Local Area networking (LAN), Wide Area Networidng (WAN), voice communications, disaster recovery, data security, building security software and desktoplend user services (handheld devices, PC's, peripherals and cell phones) in accordance with established service levels. The Technical Services team is challenged with providing technology solutions that lay a foundation for future growth as well as improve the quality of the usedcustomer everience. 1.33 9.00 4.00 0.33 0 0 1.33 9.00 4.00 0.33 0 14.67 14.67 $1,831,784 278,032 496,805 753,619 103,500 $3,463,740 1.67 9.00 4.00 0.33 0 0 $1,861,805 $1,919,385 283,593 292,101 506,741 521,943 768,691 791,752 105570 108,737 $3,526,400 $3,633,918 1.67 9.00 4.00 0.33 0 0 1.67 9.00 4.00 0.33 0 0 15.00 J 15.00 15.00 165 Expense Object 51010 Salaries & Wages 51020 Overtime 51120 Membership & Licensing Fees 51210 FICA Taxes 51220 Group Insurance 51230 Pension Contribution 51510 Temporary Help 51990 Accrued Salaries-IncrlDecr Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Information Systems Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 $ 2,609,309 $ 3,025,906 $ 3,007,464 $ 3,103,673 11,654 9,509 12,000 12,000 438 878 979 979 194,198 224,326 229,303 245,033 206,835 213,872 277,685 283,691 420,652 538,982 548,904 584,818 1,930,302 3,367,096 2,853,875 3,119,430 13,761 23,972 0 (101,592) Budget FY 2012 $ 3,379,895 12,300 965 257,773 347,426 684,044 2,752,284 0 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 3,413,359 $ 3,515,760 12,424 12,796 984 1,014 260,308 268,117 366,933 387,799 701,897 719,726 2,807,330 2,891,550 0 0 $ 5,387,149 $ 7,404,541 $ 6,930,210 $ 7,248,032 $ 7,434,687 $ 7,563,235 $ 7,796,761 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 52030 Machinery & Equipment Parts 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 52090 Electrical Supplies 3,472 11,079 4,000 4,000 3,500 3,570 3,677 52100 Instrument Supplies 276 0 0 0 0 0 0 52220 Janitorial Supplies 302 0 0 0 0 0 0 52240 Hand Tools 0 662 0 0 0 0 0 52300 Safety Footwear 200 593 200 200 750 765 788 52310 Telephongommunic Equip1Suppl 12,143 321 7,879 7,879 20,000 20,400 21,012 52320 Office Supplies 9,464 7,475 8,150 8,150 8,000 8,160 8,405 52330 Computer Supplies 332,737 396,005 109,484 50,034 107,454 109,603 112,891 52340 Computer Equipment - Non-Capit 0 17,822 0 0 126,045 128,566 132,423 52380 Publications/Training Supplies 407 18,246 19,390 18,790 20,150 20,553 21,170 52390 Administrative Supplies 1,806 3,108 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,978 4,097 Subtotal 52000 Supplies $ 360,926 $ 455,312 $ 153,003 $ 92,953 $ 289,799 295,595 $ 304,463 53060 Electric Usage $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0 53270 Telephone Usage 497,125 450,110 502,596 503,596 502,805 512,861 528,247 Subtotal 53000 Usage $ 497,125 $ 450,110 $ 502,596 $ 503,596 $ 502,805 $ 512,861 $ 528,247 54010 Postage $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 166 Expense Object 54050 Office System Services 54080 Advertising Services 54100 Travel Expenses 54140 Training ProgramslSeminar Fees 54180 Courier And Freight 54190 Property & Other Space Rental 54520 Professional Service 54530 Building Repairs & Services 54600 Electrical Repair Services 54650 Waste Hauling Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services 55010 55080 55090 55110 Land Purchases Instruments & Apparatus Furniture & Office Equipment Computer Equipment Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Information Systems Department Actual Actual Budget FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 2,030,571 2,148,281 3,552 3,256 3, 17,117 16,705 122,732 46,939 327 284 36,216 36,612 113,853 39,185 8,766 3,157 0 24,850 1,450 300 2,090,693 28,500 77,634 200 15,200 23,950 7,880 0 2,100 Forecast FY 2011 2,039,693 3,688 18,500 63,234 200 15,200 11,400 2,345 0 2,100 $ 2,334,584 $ 2,319,569 $ 2,249,845 $ 2,156,360 $ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 0 1,768 3,388 2,000 2,000 69,243 0 0 0 596,305 228,122 240,280 124,660 667,316 $ 231,511 $ 242,280 $ 126,660 Total General Fund Expenses $ 9,247,100 $ 10,861,043 $ 10,077,934 $ 10,127,601 Budget FY 2012 2,219,182 3,516 35,100 54,428 200 9,000 172,500 7,876 0 2,000 $ 2,503,802 $ 0 2,000 0 113,500 $ 115,500 $ 10,846,593 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 2,263,566 2,331,473 3,586 3,694 35,802 36,876 55,517 57,182 204 210 9,180 9,455 22,950 23,638 8,034 8,275 0 0 2,040 2,101 $ 2,400,878 $ 2,472,904 $ 0 $ 0 2,040 2,101 0 0 115,770 119,243 $ 117,810 $ 121,344 $ 10,890,379 $ 11,223,720 167 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 168 Human Resources Rate Commission Internal Auditor General Counsel Finance Board of Trustees Executive Director Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer ENGINEERING Information Systems Engineering Operations Director of Engineering Design I Planning - Program anagement Environmental Compliance 169 Engineering Mission To responsibly deliver and regulate stormwater and wastewater facilities to protect the water environment. Fiscal Year 2011 Accomplishments Stormwater Quality 1, The Department has given 10 formal Educational Outreach Presentations (talks) this past year, reaching a cumulative estimated audience of 650 design engineers, architects, landscape architects, landscapers, contractors and municipal public works staff. The presentations have been focused primarily on solutions that meet the MSD Storm Water Regulations, with emphasis on storm water quality best management practices (BMPs). With these same stakeholders, MSD development review completed "Standard Design Details for Bioretention and Permeable Pavement'. These two categories of storm water BMPs make up 50%of BMP permits. These standards are now available on the MSD website for private development use, and in FY 2012 will be integrated into a web -based BMP Toolkit" 2. The Department led a year -long BMP implementation work group consisting of 24 stakeholder organizations to identify and make recommendations to reduce barriers to green infrastructure, titled "Stormwater Best Management Practices Post -Construction Recommendations Addressing Legal Impediments and Mandated Impervious Areas'. We were excited to present significant recommendations that we could all agree on given the diverse stakeholder group. Capital Program 1. Reached substantial completion of the $95 million Lemay WWTP Wet Weather Expansion. 2. Awarded 73 construction contracts totaling $177 million. 3. Rehabilitated approximately 117,000 feet of sanitary sewer at a cost of $9.5 million. 4. Coordinated with the City of St. Louis Airport to inspect 100,000 feet of sewers and 260 manholes, some for the first time. 5. Completed Department reorganization to meet future capital needs. Technology 1. Developed and completed all requirements for the integration of the GIS to Maximo as part of MSD's new Asset Management System. The work was completed on schedule with no unplanned production disruptions. This included: a. Extensive meetings and consultations with personnel in Engineering, Operations, Finance, IS and external IBM consultants to rationalize the GIS database structure. b. Development of new automated routines for data input in the new database system. c. Development of new algorithms to inform the input routines above, d. Major restructuring of the MSD schema in the database. 2. Installed and implemented a new Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). The old system was obsolete, unsupported by the LIMS company and required an excessive amount of MSD maintenance to keep the system operational. The new system will improve lab efficiency and reduce MSD staff time for maintenance. 170 Engineering FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District Stratei ies101YectiveslMilestones 1st Quarter end Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul Aug ---. Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Strategy 1: Educate &Partner with Stakeholders to Build Positive Relationships Objective 3: Achieve Vendor Inclusion Objectives b) Hold in-house nehvorking events for MWBE business owners. c) Review "Small Sewer Contractor" opportunity initiative and make adjustments if necessary. e) Select small sewer contractorjs) to be coachedlmentored for business growth. Strategy 2: Manage District's Costs & Revenues to Optimize Financial Performance Objective 2: Implement Cost Savings Initiatives a) Each Department to target top three opportunities for cost reduction & take action to maximize savings. Objective 3: Improve Long Term Financing Plans for District Needs a) Review Status of CIRP supporting revenue and revise capital projects on a on -going basis. b) Adjust multi -decade financing plan to support LT CIRP Program & regulatory requirements in response to EPA mediation. d) Revise multi -decade financng plan to support Wet Weather Master Plan. -_-_ Objective 4: Maximize Extemal Sources of Funding a) Actively pursue grant funding. c) Reassess fees in relation to economic conditions & service levels. e) Actively pursue the establishment of the Clean Water Trust Fund proposed by NACWA. Ongoing _ ■■�■ Strategy 3: Leverage Appropriate Technology to Integrate &Improve District Business Processes Objective 1: Analyze Effectiveness of Re -Engineered Business Processes & Identify Future Improvement a) Define & implement metrics to measure improvements from re -engineered business processes. b) Re -visit business case and perform costlbeneft analysis. c) Review organizational impacts of re -engineered processes and implement alignments as needed. d) Identify additional business process changes to improve effectiveness & efficiency of District e) Review & ensure business processes & software tools to support EPA Consent Decree compliance reporting. -- Objective 2: Perform Evaluation & Develop Recommendation for Re -Engineering of Development ReviewlPermitting Business Process a) Document current business processes and business needs. b) Identify industry -standard software solutions that utilize best management practices. c) Perform benefit/cost analysis of identified software and make recommendation. d) Develop plan to support software implementation if approved. 1 of 2 171 Engineering FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District Strate I ieslOb'ectiveslMilestones 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Strategy 4: Promote Appropriate Reg Standards thru Proactive Gov't Involvement Objective 2: Participate in Stakeholder Groups to Develop Sound Technical Basis for Regulatory issues a) Participate in reg stakeholder groups created to address nutrient criteria and other changes to MDNR effluent regulations & water quality standards. b) Participate in stale & local environmental & economic organizations. c) Participate in Water Environment Federation (WEF). d) Participate with National Assodation of Clean Water Agencies on water issues. e) Develop annual report to present results of participation in regulatory agendes. f) Identify upcoming regulatory issues for FY 2013 & develop appropriate strategy. g) Obtain stakeholder feedback on content of new SW Mgmi Plan for Phase II SW Permit. Strategy 5: Address Customer Service Levels Needs & Reg Required thru Comprehensive Asset Mgmt Program Objective 1: Improve Customer Service Levels b) Measure consulting engineer customer satisfaction. c) Measure customer satisfaction of re -engineered plan review & permitting practices. _--. ---- Objective 2: Implement Strategic Stormwater Operating and Capital Improvement Initiatives a) Complete implementation of service levels by area in line with funding constraints. Objective 3: Implement Strategic Wastewater Operating and Capital Improvement a) Complete implementation of a private inflow elimination program. b) Implement a revised Capital ImprovementlReplacement Program delivery model. Strategy 6: Create a Learning- & Business -Oriented Culture Based on Competency & Accountability Objective 1: Increase Organization Performance thru Succession Planning & Improved Organizational Communication d) Department Directors will have Department -wide staff meeting at least twice a year. Ongoing 172 2of2 $25 $20 2 $15 0 $0 Engineering Expenses �00 cb �0� �0� %Do Qo 6, 09 0, 2, 7 000 �O70 2077 20j� 26j6 20j9 Engineering's FY2012 operating budget of $22.3 million represents an increase of $570 thousand from the FY2011 budget. This increase is primarily from scheduled salary and benefit increases in Personnel Services. 250 -/ 200 -7 150 f 100 -7 50 0 Personnel (Projected (Budget I9 Forecast °Actual Q00 200$ Q070 �07 207 �07 �Q009 307 �O7 Q07 ?Of 1307it This budget reflects no change in the number of full-time equivalent positions allocated to this deparhnent. 173 Engineering Department EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Design Division Planning Division Construction Management Division Environmental Compliance Division TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Design Division Planning DMsion Conshudan Management Division Environmental Compliance DMsion TOTAL POSITIONS 2008.2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2010-2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $7,921,078 $7,916,826 $4,770,523 $4,819,691 4,505,348 4,560,960 7,135,178 7,275,795 6,204,891 5,700,277 4,642,878 4,732,732 4,718,843 4,884,387 5,186,732 4,997,406 $23,350,159 $23,062,451 $21,735,310 $21,825,623 83.50 41.50 56.50 48.50 230 83.50 45.50 54.50 50.50 234 52.50 75.50 56.50 49.50 234 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES Overall increase of $569.652 51000 Personnel Services budget indude an increase of $610,864 for Salaries & Wages and benefits, 52.50 75.50 56.50 49.50 234 2011.2012 Budget $4,999,585 7,225,848 4,954,946 5,214,897 $22,395,275 84.50 46.50 53.50 49.50 234 J 2012.2013 2013-2014 Projected Projected $5,084,786 $5,247,893 7,342,411 7,573,378 5,037,764 5,198,135 5,304,422 5,477,789 $22,769,382 $23,497,194 84.50 46.50 53.50 49.50 234 84.50 46.50 53.50 49.50 234 174 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Design Division 2008-2009 2009.2010 2010-2011 2010-2011 2011-2012� 2012-2013 2013.2014 Actual Actual Budget Forecast Budget Projected Projected 100 Personnel Services $6,739,338 S6,932,538 $4,553,611 $4,608,264 S4,810,791 $4,892,216 $5,049,546 200 Supplies 38,226 34,645 26,978 26,123 27,875 28,433 29,285 300 Utilities 17,103 18,121 8,745 8,745 10,285 10,491 10,805 400 Contractual Services 1,104,734 918,823 146,890 142,260 147.934 150,893 155,419 500 Capital Outlay 21,677 12,700 34,300 34,300 2,700 2,754 2,837 TOTAL EXPENSES $7,921,078 57,916,826 $4,770,523 $4,819,691 54,999,585 $5,084,786 $5,247,893 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 12.25 9.25 9.25 9.25 Professional 29.00 30.00 21.00 21.00 Technical 32.00 34.00 19.00 19.00 Administrative Support 10.25 10.25 2.25 2.25 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ServicelMaintenance 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 83.50 83.50 52.50 52.50 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Design Division consists of three groups that provide for preparation of construction bid documents and property rights acquisition for sanitary, storm and combined sewer projects to execute the District's capital and infrastructure repair programs. The Capital Projects Group is responsible for design and bidding of large capital projects by utilizing the services of consulting engineering firms. The Project Design Group provides for the overall design and bidding of small capital or infrastructure repair projects with District staff or consulting engineering firms to supplement District staff. Additionally, the Project Design Group directs infrastructure repair work in cooperation with the Operations Department. The Right-of-Way/Survey Group provides overall District support as it relates to property rights acquisition and surveying services. 9.25 31.00 33.00 11.25 0.00 0.00 9.25 9.25 31.00 31.00 33.00 33.00 11.25 11.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84.50 J 84.50 84.50 175 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Planning Division 2008,2009 2009-2010 2010.2011 2010.2011 2011-2011 2012-2013 2013-2014 Actual Actual Budget Forecast Budget Projected Projected 100 Personnel Services $3,967,214 $4,175,329 $6,826,953 $6,972,780 $6,914,553 $7,024,809 $7,246,112 200 Supplies 40,993 24,361 37,953 36,478 34,075 34,757 35,799 300 Utilities 3,927 3,992 6,465 5,865 6,165 6,369 6,696 400 Contractual Services 471,741 354,772 263,808 260,673 271,055 276,477 284,770 500 Capital Outlay 21,473 2,507 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $4,505,348 $4,560,960 $7,135,178 $7,275,795 S7,225,848 $7,342,411 $7,573,378 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft ServicelMaintenance 8.25 7.25 11.25 11.25 15.00 20.00 37.00 37.00 11.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 7.25 7.25 15.25 1525 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.25 21.00 11.00 7.25 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 41.50 45.50 75.50 75.50 46.50; DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Planning Division consists of long and short range planning for sanitary, stone and combined sewer projects that comprise the annual Capital Improvement & Replacement Program (CIRP) for the District This planning indudes the development of the District's CSO Long Term Control Plan and the SSO Control Plan to comply with regulatory requirements, project prioritization, scheduling and funding, conceptual and preliminary designs, Subdistrict planning, system investigation and hydraulic modeling of the sewer systems; the Division is responsible for the Distrd's GIS system and digital asset management the Division oversees the Development Review section for MSD which indudes the review, permitting and construction inspection of all public and private developments for combined, sanitary and stomrwater drainage systems, inspection and dedication of all public sewer systems and providing general sewer information to the public: and finally, the Planning Division provides administrative management for the Engineering Department Mich includes management of the Graphics and Central Files sections, management of the Quality Based Selection (QBS) process for acquiring professional services, grant applications, various budget related duties, contract preparation and departmental reporting. 725 7.25 21.00 21.00 11.00 11.00 7.25 7.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.50 46.50 176 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Construction Management Division 2008-2009 2009.2010 2010-2011 2010-2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 100 Personnel Sennces $4,257,836 $4,391,734 64,397,278 $4,491,652 200 Supplies 35,808 24,399 41,318 56,780 300 Utilities 14,225 14,055 20,895 20,895 400 Contractual Services 1,889,792 1,269,972 182,388 163,406 500 Capital Outlay 7,230 118 1,000 0 TOTAL EXPENSES $6204,891 $5,700,277 $4,642,878 $4,732,732 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 14.25 7.25 3.25 3.25 Professional 24.00 27.00 6.00 6.00 Technical 16.00 16.00 44.00 44.00 Administrative Support 2.25 4.25 3.25 3.25 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Service/Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 56.50 54.50 56.50 56.50 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Construction Management Division consists of two groups; the Capital Construction Group and the Development Inspection Group. The Capital Construction Group is responsible for the management, coordination and inspection of all construction projects included in the District's Capital Improvement and Replacement Program (CIRP). This responsibilityindudes the contract management of consultant construction management services required for major projects. The Development Inspection Group is responsible for the construction inspection and approval of improvements to the public storm, sanitary andlor combined sewer system that are required as part of private development or munidpal improvement projects. The group is also responsible for the inspection of certain private storm water management 2011.20121 Budget $4,713,551 42,663 23,153 173,579 2,000 $4,954,946 6.25 26.00 17.00 4.25 0.00 0.00 53.50i 2012-2013 2013-2014 Projected Projected $4,791,540 $4,944,524 43,517 44,8N 23,616 24,324 177,052 18P,363 2,040 2,101 $5,037,764 $5,198,135 6.25 6.25 26.00 26.00 17.00 17.00 4,25 4.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.50 53.50 177 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Environmental Compliance Division 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2010-2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 100 Personnel Services $4,078,859 $4232,637 $4,459,881 $4,313,976 200 Supplies 324,399 310,809 363,150 361,413 300 Utilities 9,991 10,954 11,209 8,105 400 Contractual Services 252,962 269,757 333,493 294,913 500 Capital Outlay 52,632 60,231 19,000 19,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $4,718,843 $4,884,387 $5,186,732 $4,997,406 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 725 825 825 8.25 Professional 18.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Technical 18.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 Administrative Support 3.25 3.25 325 3.25 Skilled/Craft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ServicelMaintenance 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 48.50 50.50 49.50 49.50 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES Environmental Compliance is responsible for providing environmental regulatory assistance and enforcement for the District. Environmental Compliance has three major sections: - Laboratory Operations is responsible for the analysis of wastewater, stream and sludge samples to support MSD's Industrial Pretreatment Program, Wastewater Treatment Plant Compliance and other environmental compliance programs. -Industrial Pretreatment is responsible for the implementation of the federally mandated program that requires MSD to sample, inspect and regulate its industrial customers. This section also administers MSD's Feld Monitoring Program which includes the monitoring of streams, SSOs, CSOs and green infrastructure, and the Cost Recovery Programs which includes the Hauled Waste Program, Return Factor Program and Special Discharge Program. -Compliance Programs is responsible for implementation of MSD's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit, Emergency Response, Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) Control Program, Regulatory Affairs and other MSD environmental compliance programs. 2011.2012 Budget $4,558,642 354,869 6,081 288,305 7,000 55,214,897 8.25 16.00 21.00 3.25 0.00 1.00 49.50 J 2012.2013 2013-2014 Protected Protected $4,632,394 $4,779,112 364,615 382,041 6,203 6,388 294,071 302,893 7,140 7,354 $5,304,422 55,477,189 8.25 8.25 16.00 16.00 21.00 21.00 3.25 3.25 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 49.50 49.50 118 Expense Object 51010 Salaries & Wages 51020 Overtime 51100 Emp Service & Incentive Awards 51120 Membership & Licensing Fees 51210 FICA Taxes 51220 Group Insurance 51230 Pension Contribution 51510 Temporary Help 51990 Accrued Salaries-IncrlDecr Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases 52030 Machinery & Equipment Parts 52040 Machinery & Equipment -Non-Ca 52050 Construction & Bldg Supplies 52070 Hardware 52080 Hose Supplies 52090 Electrical Supplies 52100 Instrument Supplies 52110 Chemical Supplies 52120 Laboratory Supplies 52130 Engineering & Drafting Supply 52150 Plumbing Supplies 52160 Paint Supplies 52170 Safety Supplies 52220 Janitorial Supplies 52240 Hand Tools 52280 Uniforms 52300 Safety Footwear 52310 TelephonelCammunic Equip1Suppl METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Engineering Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 $ 13,994,256 $ 14,517,712 $ 14,662,144 $ 14,957,913 126,572 121,045 120,660 127,250 8,850 12,860 5,000 3,750 23,381 19,878 25,792 25,792 1,032,779 1,073,985 1,119,740 1,142,799 1,455,444 1,301,M 1,748,454 1,722,635 2,256,040 2,585,933 2,515,932 2,867,620 64,070 28,178 40,000 20,000 81,855 70,874 0 (481,087) Budget FY 2012 $ 14,800,102 118,592 0 26,921 1,133,603 1,836,619 3,061,698 20,090 0 $ Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 14,946,638 $ 15,395,037 119,784 123,378 0 0 27,459 28,283 1,144,751 1,179,093 1,940,317 2,051,087 3,141,609 3,221,405 20,400 21,012 0 0 $ 19,043,247 $ 19,732,238 S 20,237,722 $ 20,386,672 $ 20,997,536 $ 21,340,958 $ 22,019,296 $ 9,459 $ 9,805 $ 10,850 5,155 4,811 6,500 0 1,332 31,150 9,034 4,312 8,600 784 1,970 1,100 3,523 3,105 1,685 11,566 6,764 5,560 17,499 17,658 15,905 69,893 76,840 77,128 118,018 118,327 133,41)2 1,197 1,760 4,750 285 6 0 28 241 300 8,575 8,715 10,449 4,625 4,534 6,050 3,280 1,995 2,590 18,662 20,032 13,854 18,402 18,035 20,300 2,803 591 1,295 $ 10,100 6,500 16,000 7,100 900 1,600 5,500 13,500 90,000 141,000 4,500 0 400 9,400 5,050 1,600 19,850 19,900 1,795 $ 10,600 8,250 17,310 7,100 900 1,685 5,600 12,055 88,278 141,645 4,450 0 300 10,395 5,050 2,200 20,286 21,150 2,000 S 10,812 8,415 17,656 7,242 918 1,719 5,712 12,296 92,692 144,478 4,539 0 306 10,603 5,151 2,244 20,692 21,573 2,040 $ 11,136 8,668 18,186 7,459 946 1,770 5,883 12,665 101,961 148,812 4,675 0 315 10,921 5,306 2,311 21,312 22,220 2,101 179 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Engineering Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast Expense Object FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 52320 Office Supplies 48,933 39,985 56,000 52,100 52330 Computer Supplies 78,025 32,801 33,960 48,127 52340 Computer Equipment - Non-Capit 0 6,901 9,399 9,900 52360 Grounds Supplies 69 0 0 0 52370 Photo &Video Supplies 1,171 998 1,750 1,250 52380 Publicationaraining Supplies 5,293 7,842 8,610 6,220 52390 Administrative Supplies 3,146 3,652 3,760 4,000 52400 Furniture& Office Equipment- 0 1,202 4,450 4,500 Subtotal 52000 Supplies $ 439,425 $ 394,214 $ 469,397 $ 480,792 53060 Electric Usage $ 1,323 $ 1,129 $ 2,100 $ 1,500 53070 Natural Gas Usage 947 1,109 900 900 53270 Telephone Usage 42,976 44,883 44,314 41,210 Subtotal 53000 Usage Budget FY 2012 59,098 15,350 6,030 0 1,400 9,290 3,960 5,100 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 60,280 62,088 15,657 16,127 6,151 6,335 0 0 1,428 1,471 9,476 9,760 4,039 4,160 5,202 5,358 $ 459,482 $ 1,500 1,200 42,984 $ 471,320 $ 491,948 $ 1,575 1,733 1,260 1,323 43,844 45,159 $ 45,246 $ 47,122 $ 47,314 S 43,610 $ 45,684 $ 46,679 $ 48,214 54010 Postage $ 0 $ 6 $ 0 $ 0 54050 Office System Services 11,513 10,580 11,100 9,462 54060 Printing Services 37,031 19,273 54,675 49,720 54080 Advertising Services 3,842 43,226 24,000 24,000 54100 Travel Expenses 236,712 194,185 221,032 213,907 54120 Photo Services 8,336 8,681 13,250 7,300 54140 Training Programs/Seminar Fees 59,284 22,815 72,700 65,375 54160 Data Imaging Services 77,261 77,862 85,000 79,000 54180 Courier And Freight 2,086 1,980 2,200 2,050 54190 Properly& Other Space Rental 46,412 50,797 58,500 58,500 54420 Court Costs & Lien Fees 6,726 4,495 6,600 3,600 54440 Easement Acquisitions/Fees 443,655 152,534 10,000 10,000 54520 Professional Service 2,590,000 2,064,548 165,060 135,000 54530 Building Repairs & Services 5,372 1,974 2,800 2,800 54540 Janitorial Services 30,761 31,288 42,840 35,840 $ 0 11,020 49,575 14,000 214,704 1,500 73,035 79,000 2,100 64,500 3,600 10,000 170,000 2,800 35,840 S 0$ 0 11,240 11,578 50,566 52,083 14,280 14,708 218,998 225,568 1,530 1,576 74,495 76,730 80,580 82,997 2,142 2,206 65,790 67,764 3,672 3,782 10,200 10,506 173,400 178,602 2,856 2,942 36,557 37,654 180 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Engineering Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast Expense Object FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 54550 Grounds Services 0 150 0 0 54570 Machinery & Equipment Services 734 7,669 300 515 54580 Equipment Rental 2,866 2,582 3,600 3,031 54590 Sewer Rep & Structure Cleaning 0 0 0 13,000 54610 Instrument Repair Services 68,208 65,030 73,720 71,250 54620 Plumbing Services 706 0 0 0 54630 HVAC Services 99 0 100 1,000 54640 Damage Repairs & Services 0 0 2,000 0 54650 Waste Hauling 9,131 7,021 12,760 15,000 54670 Other Governmental Fees 825 4,495 14,450 14,450 54680 Laboratory Tesbng Services 19,752 20,447 23,000 26,000 54690 Safety Services 0 118 450 450 54700 Asbestos Removal Services 0 6,674 0 0 54710 Community Outreach Programs 57,919 14,292 22,500 20,000 54720 Tree RemovallWeed Spraying 0 600 4,000 0 Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services $ 3,719,231 $ 2,813,322 $ 926,577 $ 861,250 55010 Land Purchases $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 55070 Machinery & Implements 569 0 1,000 0 55080 Instruments & Apparatus 45,428 37,804 44,000 44,000 55090 Furniture & Office Equipment 14,234 10,522 100 100 55110 Computer Equipment 42,779 27,230 9,200 9,200 Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay $ 103,010 $ 75,556 $ 54,300 $ 53,300 Budget FY 2012 0 100 3,600 0 66,000 0 1,000 2,000 13,100 8,450 28,000 450 0 22,500 4,000 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 0 0 102 105 3,672 3,782 0 0 67,320 69,340 0 0 1,020 1,051 2,040 2,101 13,362 13,763 8,619 8,878 28,560 29,417 459 473 0 0 22,950 23,639 4,080 4,202 $ 880.873 $ 0 1.000 7.000 2.500 1.200 $ 898,491 $ 925,445 $ 0 $ 0 1,020 1,051 7,140 7,354 2,550 2,627 1,224 1,261 Total General Fund Expenses $ 23,350,159 S 23,062,451 $ 21,735,310 $ 21,825,624 $ 11.700 $ 22,395,275 $ 11,934 $ 12,292 $ 22,769,382 $ 23,497,196 181 i FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 182 Rate Commission Internal Auditor Board of Trustees i Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer Executive Director General Counsel Human Resources Finance Information Systems Engineering OPERATIONS Operations Director of Operations Support I; Collection Services System Treatment Pump Plants Stations 183 Operations Department Mission To protect the public's health, safety and water environment by effectively operating and maintaining the District's wastewater and stormwater infrastructure. Fiscal Year 2011 Accomplishments 1. Maintenance -related basement back-ups were at a record low of 356 due to preventive sewer cleaning program. 2. Dry weather sewer overflows were a record low of 260. 3. Overall on -time response to customer service calls was a record high of 91 %. 4. Received six gold (perfect compliance) and one silver NACWA awards for treatment plant compliance. 5. Successfully implemented conversion of electronic maintenance management system from Hansen to Maximo. 6. Cleaned over 3.5 million feet of pipe as preventive maintenance. 7. Had record high customer satisfaction survey response for field service. 8. Cut overtime expenses by 40% compared to previous year. 9. Successfully completed wet weather expansion of the Lemay Treatment Plant to a maximum daily capacity of 340 million gallons. 184 Operations FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District StrategieslObjectives1Milestones 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Strategy 2: Manage District's Costs & Revenues to Optimize Financial Performance Objective 2: Implement Cost Savings Initiatives a) Each Department to target top three opportunities for cost reduction & take action to ma 'mize savings. ---_ Objective 3: Improve Long Term Financing Plans for District Needs a) Review Status of CIRP supporting revenue and revise capital projects on an on -going basis. b) Adjust multi -decade financing plan to support LT CIRP Program & regulatory requirements in response to EPA mediation. c) Manage District's LT Bonding Program based upon EPA mediation & CIRP project timing. d) Revise multi -decade financing plan to support Wet Weather Master Plan. Strategy 3: Leverage Appropriate Technology to Integrate & Improve District Business Processes Objective 1: Analyze Effectiveness of Re•Engineered Business Processes & Identify Future Improvement a) Define & implement metrics to measure improvements from re -engineered business processes. b) Re -visit business case and perform cost/benefit analysis. c) Review organizational impacts of re -engineered processes and implement alignments as needed. d) Identify additional business process changes to improve effectiveness & efficiency of the District. e) Review & ensure business processes & software tools to support EPA Consent Decree compliance reporting. Strategy4: Promote Appropriate Reg Standards thru Proactive Gov't Involvement Objective 2: Participate in Stakeholder Groups to Develop Sound Technical Basis for Regulatory issues b) Participate in state & local environmental & economic organizations. Strategy 5: Address Customer Service Levels Needs & Reg Required thru Comprehensive Asset Mgmt Program. Objective 1: Improve Customer Service Levels a) Develop & implement strategies to maintain overall Post Contact Survey to 80%. ---■ ..-_ Objective 2: Implement Strategic Stormwater Operating and Capital Improvement Initiatives a) Complete implementation of service levels by area in line with funding constraints. Objective 3: Implement Strategic Wastewater Operating and Capital Improvement Initiatives a) Complete implementation of a private inflow elimination program. c) Establish Customer Service goals for emergency calls &other maintenance related work and publish. d) Establish & communicate water back-up goals related to deaningfinspecting sanitary system. _■ 1 of 2 185 Operations FY 2012 Strategic Business Plan District StrategieslObjectives/Milestones 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Objective 4: Expand Asset Management Program a) Implement a structural assessment program for large brick sewers. b) Implement force main assessment program. cl Revisefimplement level of service goals for plants, pump stations & collection systems. d) Continue development of standard condition assessment & ask models for SW & WW assets. e) Implement in -sourcing plan for system investigation activities. f) Begin phase -in of contracted Closed Circuit TV (CCTV) sewer inspections. g) Implement comprehensive asset management program to meet regulatory requirements. _. ■ Strategy 6: Create a Learning- & Business -Oriented Culture Based on Competency & Accountability Objective 1: Increase Organization Performance thru Succession Planning & Improved Organizational Communication d) Department Directors will have Department -wide staff meeting at least twice a year. Ongoing 186 2af2 $100 $90 $80 $70 C $30 $20 $10 $0 Expenses �y A). kk 200 207 20i 0 0 7 ?0, 2 Operations Department kJ, cpe The FY 2012 operating budget of $87.4 million represents an increase of $3.3 million from the FY 2011 forecast This change includes increases to each expense grouping; Personnel Services $1.6 million, Supplies $73 thousand, Utilities $276 thousand, $708 thousand in Contractual Services, and $586 thousand in Capital Outlay. 400 300 200 100 Personnel �y .oy 2°°° 2°10 20'7 20'2 20'0 20c This budget reflects an increase of 1 Maintenance Technician I Projected 'Budget 6 Forecast OActual 187 Operations Department EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Support Services Collection System Facilities Treatment Plants Pump Stations FY 2009 FY 2010 Actual Actual FY 2011 FY 2011 Budget Forecast $11,997,754 $11,503,949 $11,287,579 $11,235,391 23,827,915 25,697,136 25,798,658 26,392,411 31,282,270 34,019,673 35,484,694 35,688.724 10.073,349 10,775,126 10,736,976 10,806,610 TOTAL EXPENSES $77,181,288 $81,995,883 S83,307,907 $84,123,135 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Support Services Collection System Facilities Treatment Plants Pump Stations TOTAL POSITIONS SIGNIFICANT BUGET CHANGES 75.00 302.00 172,00 40.00 589 62.00 301.00 172.00 57.00 592 58.00 270.00 174.00 61.00 51000 Personnel Services increase of $2.4 million primarily due to a $12 million increase in pension costs with the remaining increase associated with 563 58.00 270.00 174.00 61.00 563 FY 2012 Budget $11,679,838 26,659,856 36.772,774 12,265,287 $87,377.756 58.00 270.00 175.00 61.00 564 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected S11,902,393 $12,284,870 27,138,156 28,024,671 37,797,744 39,690,713 12,572,381 13,155,534 $89,410,674 $93,155,786 58.00 270.00 175.00 61.00 564 58.00 270.00 175.00 61.00 564 188 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Support Services FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $4,231,646 $4,594,483 $4,638,166 $4,720,918 52000 Supplies 3,288,444 3,607,244 3,564,644 3,497,555 53000 Usage 113,740 113,770 134,524 139,550 54000 Contractual Services 1,152,592 1,220,930 1,129,845 1,051,968 55000 Capital Outlay 3211,332 1,967,5U 1,820,400 1,825,400 TOTAL EXPENSES $11,997,754 $11,503,949 $11,287,579 $11,235,391 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 10.00 7.00 9.00 9.00 Professional 0.00 100 4.00 4.00 Technical 4.00 6.00 300 8.00 Administrative Support 17.00 20.00 12.00 12.00 Skilled/Craft 34.00 21.00 19.00 19.00 ServiceNaintenance 10.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 75.00 62.00 58.00 58.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Support Services Division is divided into four areas: Customer Care, Administrative Support, Materials Management and the Garage and Shops. 1) Customer Care Group- receives all non -billing customer calls. creates service requests, dispatches emergency calls, and communicates status to customers. 2) Administrative Support Group -provides administrative support to all Plants and Yards, enters Payroll and tracks and reports a variety of performance indicators. 3) Materials Management -fulfills material requests including procurement, receipt, storage, retrieval of supplies, Inventory Control System accuracy, develops material standards and specifications and cost control for managing inventory. 4) Garage and Shops • provides fthe maintenance, repair and upkeep of the District's office buildings and grounds. Provides vehicular and equipment maintenance and repair to the District's fleet and machine machine shop fabrication and repairs. r FY 20121 Budget $5,092,761 3,534,249 163,826 1,106,602 1,782,400 $11,679,838 9.00 4.00 8.00 12.00 19.00 6.00 58.002 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $5,176,159 $5,340,790 3,609,464 3,728,846 169,' : 180,048 1,128,734 1,162,596 1,818,048 1,872,590 $11,902,393 $12,284,870 9.00 9.00 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 1200 19.00 19.00 6.00 6.00 58.00 58.00 189 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay Administrative Support Group FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast S510,795 $517,054 $539,912 $434,947 3.277 2,077 3,125 2,475 2,041 1,917 2,256 2,200 337,172 344,737 349,250 347,400 0 0 1,400 1,400 TOTAL EXPENSES $853,285 $865,785 $895,943 $788,422 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support SkilledlCraft Service/Maintenance 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 4.00 9.00 3.00 3.00 FY 20121 Budget $491,215 3,125 2,256 354,250 1,400 $852,246 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Pro ected Proiecled $499,126 $514,710 3,187 3,283 2,301 2,370 361,335 372,175 1,428 1,471 $867,377 $894,009 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 190 FY 2009 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Actual 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay TOTAL EXPENSES $ ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OffigalslAdministrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft ServicelMaintenance TOTAL POSITIONS 2,108,628 2,822,526 14,366 218,238 9,480 Operations Support Group FY 2010 Actual $ 2,438,214 $ 3,149,258 16,013 202,753 3,252 5,173,238 $ 6.00 0.00 3.00 15.00 17,00 7.00 48.00 FY 2011 FY 2011 Budget Forecast 2,391,059 $ 2,526,487 3,081,869 3,078,880 18,188 16,250 254,965 257,250 0 0 5,809,490 $ 5,746,081 $ 5,878,867 3.00 1.00 6.00 13.00 1.00 7.00 5.00 4.00 8.00 11.00 2.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 8.00 11.00 2.00 6.00 31.00 36.00 36.00 FY2012 Budget $ 2,828,035 3,063,874 16,250 257,250 0 $ 6,165,409 5.00 4.00 8.00 11.00 2.00 6.00 36.00 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $ Z874,816 3,129,652 16,575 262,395 0 $2,966,694 3,234,566 17,072 270,267 0 $ 6,283,438 $6,488,599 5.00 4.00 8.00 11.00 2.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 8.00 11.00 2.00 6.00 36.00 36.00 191 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Facilities, Garage and Shops Division FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $1,612,223 $1,639,215 $1,707,195 $1,759,484 52000 Supplies 462,641 455,909 479,650 416,200 53000 Usage 97,333 95,840 114,080 121,100 54000 Contractual Services 597,182 673,440 525,630 447,318 55000 Capital Outlay 3,201,852 1,964,270 1,819,000 1,824,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $5,971,231 $4,828,674 $4,645,555 $4,568,102 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Offidals/Administrative 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Technical 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 17.00 20.00 17.00 17.00 Service/Maintenance 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 23.00 22.00 19.00 19.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Facilities, Garage and Shops Division is a multi -faceted function within the department The division provides for the following: - Provides for the maintenance, repair and upkeep of the District's office building and grounds - Vehicular and equipment maintenance to the District's fleet - Machine shop fabrication and repairs - Vehicular, building and general painting - Carpentry fabrication and repairs l FY2012� Budget $1,773,511 467,250 145.320 495.102 1,781,000 $4,662,183 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 0.00 19.00 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,802,217 $1,859.386 476,625 490,997 151,112 160,606 505,004 520,154 1,816,620 1,871.119 $4.751,578 $4,902.262 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.00 17.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 19.00 192 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Collections System Facilities FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $18,835,109 $20,297,857 $20,542,157 $20,992,640 52000 Supplies 2,684,022 3,280,833 2,590,855 2,634,957 53000 Usage 191,207 228,267 242,530 228,530 54000 Contractual Services 2,027,726 1,792,353 2,347,916 2,480,284 55000 Capital Outlay 89,851 97,826 75,200 56,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $23,827,915 $25,697,136 $25,798,658 $26,392,411 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 21.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 Professional 9.00 8.00 4.00 4.00 Technical 3.00 3,00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 84.00 148.00 171.00 171.00 Service/Maintenance 185.00 122.00 75.00 75.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 302.00 301.00 270.00 270.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The three Collection System Facilities are responsible for the operation and repair of the sanitary, combined, and storm sewers. To meet this duty, the following services are performed; i Mechanical and manual cleaning of sewers and structures fa Manual and closed circuit television inspection of sewers I Cleaning of debris from creeks and improved channels Repairlreplacement of manholes, inlets and other structures Repaidreplacement of sanitary, combined and storm sewers • Repair of improved channels, creek banks and flood control structures Engineering evaluation and solutions for qualified stormwater problems II Sewer separation solutions for qualified homeowners experiencing water -in -basement problems / 1 FY 2012 Budget $21,211,007 2,654,805 239,048 2,511,796 43,200 $26,659,856 20.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 171.00 75.00 27°M./ FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $21,571,451 $22,269,742 2,715,725 2,816,366 244,884 254,284 2,562,032 2,638,893 44,064 45,386 $27,138,156 $28,024,671 20.00 20.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 171.00 171.00 75.00 75.00 270.00 270.00 193 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Sulphur Collections System Facility FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $5,747,099 $5,593,387 $5,626,880 $6,302,087 52000 Supplies 1,013,115 1,262,646 905,050 942,900 53000 Usage 66,829 75,445 75,000 61,000 54000 Contractual Services 706,807 642,125 528,400 659,300 55000 Capital Outlay 5,205 8,019 14,200 2,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $7,539,055 $7,581,622 $7,149.530 $7,967,287 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 Professional 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Technical 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 20.00 20.00 47.00 47.00 Service/Maintenance 56.00 57.00 28.00 28.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 85.00 87.00 81.00 81.00 FY 2012 Budget $6,272,615 969,000 70,000 673,480 14,200 $7,999,295 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.00 28.00 81.00 FY 2013 FY 2014 Proiected Proiected $6,379,361 $6,586,168 990,810 1,026,488 71,400 73,542 686,950 707,558 14,484 14,919 $8,143,005 $8,408,675 6.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.00 47.00 28.00 28.00 81.00 81.00 194 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay Mintert Collections System Facility FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $6,560,723 $7,568,947 $7,304,513 $7,547,339 784,188 916,582 774,454 775,454 80,509 94,520 103,930 103,930 611,089 522,823 1,069,679 1,068,679 46,146 41,126 27,400 27,400 TOTAL EXPENSES $8,082,655 $9,143,998 $9,279,976 $9,522,802 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance 7.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 29.00 60.00 6.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 94.00 0.00 6.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 61.00 24.00 6.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 61.00 24.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 101.00 104.00 93.00 93.00 FY 20121 Budget $7,383,975 774,454 105,448 1,088,479 7,400 $9,359,756 6.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 61.00 24.00 93.00 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $7,507,436 $7,749,051 791,303 818,375 108,612 113,924 1,110,248 1,143,556 7,548 7,774 $9,525,147 $9,832,680 6.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 61.00 24.00 6.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 61.00 24.00 93.00 93.00 195 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay Grand Glaize Collections System Facility FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $6,527,287 $7,135,523 $7,610,764 $7,143,214 886,719 1,101,605 911,351 916.603 43,869 58,302 63,600 63,600 709,830 627,405 749,837 752,305 38,500 48,681 33,600 26,600 TOTAL EXPENSES $8,206,205 $8,971,516 $9,369,152 $8,902,322 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance 7.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 35.00 69.00 7.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 34.00 65.00 8.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 63.00 23.00 8.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 63.00 23.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 116.00 110.00 96.00 96.00 FY 2012 Budget $7,554,417 911,351 63,600 749,837 21,600 $9.300,805 8.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 63.00 23.00 96.00 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Proiecled Projected S7,684,654 $7,934,523 933,612 971,503 64.872 66,818 764,834 787,779 22,032 22,693 $9,470,004 $9,783,316 8.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 63.00 23.00 8.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 63.00 23.00 96.00 96.00 196 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Treatment Plants FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $13,921,264 $14,421,953 514,767,297 $14,965,717 52000 Supplies 3,653,091 4,197,330 3,920,055 4,000,231 53000 Utilities 8,931,783 8,539,298 10,346,350 10,252,369 54000 Contractual Services 4,617,438 6,601,206 6,097.692 6,115,840 55000 Capital Outlay 158,694 259,886 353,300 354,567 TOTAL EXPENSES $31,282,270 $34,019,673 $35,484,694 $35,688,724 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 14.00 13.00 14.00 14.00 Professional 1.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 Technical 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 138.00 132.00 135.00 135.00 Service/Maintenance 18.00 23.00 21.00 21.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 172.00 172.00 174.00 174.00 Allocated Staffing Summary totals for FY 2009, FY 2010 and FY2011 include positions previously shown in County Treatment Plants. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The seven treatment plants include two of the largest facifties in Missouri. Four of the plants are budgeted separately. The remaining three facilities are grouped in the Meramec Watershed Plants. Each of the plants and the group of three have separate description of services on the following pages. FY 2012 Budget $15.624,367 4,107,037 10,389,866 5,699,019 952,485 $36,772,774 14.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 136.00 21.00 175.00 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $15,880,658 516,387,971 4,235,994 4,477,775 10,896,558 11,836,897 5,812,999 5,987,389 971,535 1,000,681 537,797,744 $39,690,713 14.00 14.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136.00 136.00 21.00 21.00 175.00 175.00 197 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Bissell Point Treatment Plant FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $4,842,988 $5,091,893 $5,261,177 $5,274,878 52000 Supplies 1,597,224 1,681,936 1,502,270 1,678,400 53000 Usage 4,406,083 4,085,450 4,753,780 4,607,260 54000 Contractual Services 2,215,350 2,261,179 2,439,625 2,399,367 55000 Capital Outlay 36,463 163,658 78,500 78,500 TOTAL EXPENSES $13,098,108 $13,484,116 $14,035,352 $14,038,405 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OfBcialslAdministrative 6.00 5.00 5.00 5,00 Professional 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Technical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 48.00 45.00 48.00 48.00 Service/Maintenance 6.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 60.00 59.00 61.00 61.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES Bissell Point is the largest wastewater plant in Missouri. Treating an average of 128 million gallons of wastewater per day and 89 dry tons of sludge per day, it handles the majority of St Louis' high strength industrial wastewater. The plant serves the 88 square mile Bissell watershed consisting of the northern half of the City of St Louis as well as the northeastern portions of St. Louis County. The plants secondary treatment is a biological treatment process consisting of trickling filters. Sludge is thickened and dewatered using belt filter presses. Bissell Point incinerates all solkls produced from its wastewater treatment processes as well as all solids from the District's Coklwater Creek Plant. The plant staff is also responsible for the operation and maintenance of the MSD incinerator ash disposal site. FY 2012 Budget $5,552,481 1,511,220 4,757,260 1,863,425 586,500 $14,270,886 5.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 48.00 7.00 61.00 f FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $5,642,318 $5,821,984 1,554,764 1,634,041 4,991,005 5,418,093 1,900,693 1,957,714 598,230 616,177 $14,687,010 $15,448,009 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.00 48.00 7.00 7.00 61.00 61.00 19S EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Lemay Treatment Plant FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $4,278,661 $4,265,789 $4,350,295 $4,414,264 52000 Supplies 965,119 1,005,726 1,064,734 938,049 53000 Usage 1,956,471 1,801,035 2,314,754 2,590,423 54000 Contractual Sen4ces 878,273 1,702,365 1,225,899 1,231,680 55000 Capital Outlay 111,132 78,528 260,600 260,600 TOTAL EXPENSES $8,189,656 $8,853,443 $9,216,282 $9,435,016 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 4.00 4,00 4.00 4.00 Professional 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Technical 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 38.00 35.00 36.00 36.00 Service/Maintenance 10.00 13.00 11.00 11.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 52.00 53.00 52.00 52.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES Lemay is the second largest treatment plant in Missouri treating an average flow of 119 million galbns and 50 tons of sludge each day. The Lemay Plant serves the 115 square mile Lemay watershed, treating waste from 48 county municipalities, as well as the southem portion of the City of St Louis. The plant's secondary treatment system consists of step feed activated sludge. Sludge is thickened and dewatered using belt filter presses. Lemay incinerates all solids produced from its wastewater treatment processes as well as all solids from the District's Fenton Plant FY 2012 Budget $4,568,800 1,183,306 2,480,601 1,336,686 351,785 $9,921,178 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 37.00 11.00 53.00 FY2013 FY2014 Projected Projected $4,642,785 $4,790,491 1,221,306 1,293,064 2,599,632 2,817,310 1,363,420 1,404,323 358,821 369,585 $10,185,964 $10,674,773 4.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.00 37.00 11.00 11.00 53.00 53.00 199 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Coldwater Creek Treatment Plant FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $1,143,655 $1,212,644 $1,213,935 $1,298,678 52000 Supplies 101,642 250,803 160,480 201,390 53000 Usage 615,903 731,176 977,480 852,480 54000 Contractual Services 152,013 415,198 481,882 473,575 55000 Capital Outlay 5,265 7,965 13,000 13,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $2,018,478 $2,617,786 $2,846,777 $2,839,123 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Technical 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Support 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Skilled/Craft 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 Service/Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 14.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 Personnel in years FY 2009-FY 2011 was included in County Treatment Plants. Separated for FY 2012 and forward. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES Coldwater Creek wastewater treatment plant treats an average of 26 mgd. It serves the Coldwater watershed of northern St. Louis County utilizing activated sludge secondary treatment. FY 2012 Budget S1,403,975 198,430 893.480 527.675 13,000 S3.036,560 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.00 15.00/ FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,426,914 $1,472,386 203,947 213,858 937,330 1,022,013 538,228 554,375 13,260 13,658 $3,119,679 $3,276.290 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 200 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support SkilledlCraft ServicelMainlenance Missouri River Treatment Plant FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $1,360,233 $1,417,237 $1,424,479 $1,408,164 372,391 362,546 432,752 432,752 248,297 318,098 413,928 413,928 500,290 572.692 624,505 624,505 1,965 7,530 1,200 1,200 $2,483,176 $2,678,103 $2,896,864 $2,880,549 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 Personnel in years FY 2009-FY 2011 was included in County Treatment Plants. Separated for FY 2012 and forward. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Missouri River Plant provides secondary treatment to 28 mgd, serving the Missouri River watershed in western SL Louis County, it utilizing a trickling filter process, This plant utilizes a sludge digestion process that produces methane gas which is utilized as fuel for running plant equipment. FY 2012 Budget S1.345.578 427.812 375,678 668,485 1.200 S2,818.753 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.00 15.00 J FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Proiected $1,368,248 $1,412,336 442.848 472,010 393,800 431,604 681,855 702,310 1,224 1,261 $2,887,975 $3,019,521 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.00 15.00 15.00 201 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Ou0ay TOTAL EXPENSES ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance Meramec Watershed Treatment Plant FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $2,295,727 $2,434,390 $2,517,411 $2,569,733 616,715 696,319 759,819 749,640 1,705,029 1,603,539 1,886,408 1,788,278 871,512 1,6/19,772 1,325,781 1,386,713 3,869 2,205 0 1,267 $5,492,852 $6,386,225 $6,469,419 $6,495,631 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 26.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 26.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 2.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 Personnel in years FY 2009-FY 2011 was included in County Treatment Plants. Separated for FY 2012 and forward. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Grand Glade Plant is the operation center for the Grand Glade, Fenton, and Lower Meramec treatment plants. Each serve a portion of the Meramec Watershed, which handles flows produced throughout south and southwestern St Louis County. These plants in combination treat an average of 33 million gallons with full secondary treatment FY 2012 Budget $2,753,533 786,269 1,882,847 1,302,748 0 $6,725,397 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 2.00 31.001 FY2013 FY2014 Proiected Proiecied $2,800,393 $2,890,774 813,129 864,802 1,974,791 2,147,877 1,328,81)3 1,368,667 0 0 $6,917,116 $7,272,120 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 2.00 31.00 31.00 202 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay Pump Stations FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forerast $4,793,808 $5,071,927 $5,234,131 $5,294,585 890,066 1,110,901 1,084,236 1,205,531 2,582,112 2,778,058 2,753,432 2,743,116 1,366,985 1,500,879 1,321,127 1,323,128 440,378 313,361 344,050 240,250 TOTAL EXPENSES $10,073,349 $10,715,126 $10,736,976 $10,806,610 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OffidalslAdminishative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,00 8.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.00 8.00 5.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 47.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 47.00 6.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 40,00 57.00 61.00 61.00 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Pump Station Division operates and maintains 42 flood protection stations, 25 major interceptor stations, and over200 county pump stations. This Division maintains a District wide computeked alarm system which monitors the 278 unmanned pump stations on a continuous basis. The Pump Station Division is responsible for the Bissell Point Overflow Regulation System, the Lemay Overflow Regulation System, and protecting the city during periods of high river stage. These automated systems prevent sewage from entering waterways as the river's elevation rises above the level of the sewer system. Additionally the Pump Station Division also provides temporary flow monitoring services for the District This service includes operating over 300 temporary monitors that provides flow data to help understand and solve system maintenance problems and provide better engineering solution. FY 2012 Budget $5,657,558 1,114,697 2,846,973 2,362,059 284,000 $12,265,287 5.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 47.00 6.00 61.00i FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $5,749,888 $5,933,488 1,137,878 1,174,192 2,985,634 3,267,902 2,409,301 2,481,581 289,680 298,371 $12,572,381 $13,155,534 5.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 47.00 6.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 47.00 6.00 61.00 61.00 203 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay Bissell Pump Station FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast $1,185,213 $1,107,459 $1,158,692 $1,194,426 190,619 140,721 295,907 321,109 293,811 322,996 324,458 326,428 465,066 540,141 490,844 530,960 374,963 214,672 148,000 111,800 TOTAL EXPENSES $2,509,672 $2,325,989 $2,417,901 $2,484,723 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY OfficialslAdministrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft ServicelMaintenance TOTAL POSITIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Personnel in years FY 2009-FY 2011 was included in Pump Stations. Separated for FY 2012 and forward. FY 2012 Budget $1,245,812 286,271 328,444 378,618 158.000 $2.397,145 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.00 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,266,056 $1,306,516 292,086 301,070 344,140 375,327 386,190 397,776 161,160 165,995 $2,449,632 $2,546,684 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.00 13.00 13.00 204 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Lemay Pump Station FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $1,298,789 $1,419,937 $1,347,795 $1,444,149 52000 Supplies 136.861 371,259 203,502 230,600 53000 Usage 1,650.739 1,716,861 1,673,220 1,673,024 54000 Contractual Services 282,943 230,636 291.701 246,588 55000 Capital Outlay 9,923 21.313 83,150 45,150 TOTAL EXPENSES $3,379,255 $3,760,006 $3,599,368 S3,639,511 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance TOTAL POSITIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Personnel in years FY 2009-FY 2011 was included in Pump Stations. Separated for FY 2012 and forward. FY 2012 Budget $1,430,145 225,707 1,758,946 506,171 28,000 $3,948,969 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 15.00 f FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,453,160 $1,499,452 230,236 237,180 1,846,251 2,023,672 516,295 531,784 28,560 29,417 $4,074,502 S4,321,505 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 14.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 205 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY County Pump Stations FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget Forecast 51000 Personnel Services $1,073,521 $1,197,358 $1,228,407 $1,253,566 52000 Supplies 307,024 457,794 394,512 437,798 53000 Usage 596,816 685,062 700,418 688,328 54000 Contractual Services 565,092 693,677 478,344 512,480 55000 Capital Outlay 33,626 77,169 101,900 72,300 TOTAL EXPENSES $2,576,079 $3,111,060 $2,903,581 $2,964,472 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance TOTAL POSITIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Personnel in years FY 2009-FY 2011 was included in Pump Stations. Separated for FY 2012 and forward. FY 2012 Budget S1,237,505 380,221 704,249 492,121 67,000 32,881,096 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 13.00 FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,257,665 $1,297.838 388,605 402,175 738,802 810,769 501,964 517,023 68,340 70,390 $2,955,376 $3,098,195 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 13.00 206 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 51000 Personnel Services 52000 Supplies 53000 Usage 54000 Contractual Services 55000 Capital Outlay Technical Services FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Actual Actual Budget 51,236,285 $1,347,173 $1.499,237 255,562 141,127 190,315 40,746 53,139 55,336 53,884 36,425 60,238 21,866 207 11,000 FY 2011 Forecast $1,402,444 216,024 55,336 33,100 11,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,608,343 $1,578,071 $1.816,126 $1,717,904 ALLOCATED STAFFING SUMMARY Officials/Administrative Professional Technical Administrative Support Skilled/Craft Service/Maintenance TOTAL POSITIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 Personnel in years FY 2009•FY 2011 was included in Pump Stations. Separated for FY 2012 and forward. 0.00 FY 2012 Budget $1,744,096 222,498 55,334 985,149 31,000 S3,038,077 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 10.00 5.00 20.00) FY 2013 FY 2014 Projected Projected $1,773,007 226,951 56,441 1,004,852 31,620 $1,829,682 233,767 58,134 1,034,998 32,569 $3,092,871 $3,189,150 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 10.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 10.00 5.00 20.00 20.00 207 Expense Object 51010 Salaries & Wages 51020 Overtime 51060 Worker's Compensation Pay 51100 Emp Service & Incentive Awards 51120 Membership & licensing Fees 51210 FICA Taxes 51220 Group Insurance 51230 Pension Contribution 51510 Temporary Help 51990 Accrued Salaries-IncrlDecr Subtotal 51000 Personnel Services 52010 Fuels,Lubricants,Gases 52020 Motor Vehicle Parts & Equip 52030 Machinery & Equipment Parts 52040 Machinery & Equipment - Non -Ca 52050 Construction & Bldg Supplies 52070 Hardware 52080 Hose Supplies 52090 Electrical Supplies 52100 Instrument Supplies 52110 Chemical Supplies 52120 Laboratory Supplies 52150 Plumbing Supplies 52160 Paint Supplies 52170 Safety Supplies 52220 Janitorial Supplies 52240 Hand Tools 52280 Uniforms 52300 Safety Footwear 52310 TelephonelCommunic EquiplSuppl 52320 Moe Supplies METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Operations Department Actual FY 2009 $ 27,967,285 $ 3,157,011 27,338 47,505 131,435 2,280,487 3,470,274 4,508,556 0 191,936 $ 41,781,827 $ $ 1,021,753 304,851 2,50,833 0 2,065,935 97,733 .1 143,778 688,627 498,788 1,535,344 3,507 308,305 40,312 359,566 115,428 277,569 251,031 100,129 30,253 34,368 Actual FY 2010 30,055,158 $ 2,871,872 56,723 47,505 127,665 2,405,994 3,236,818 5,353,497 40,335 190,654 44,386,221 $ $ 1,059,768 $ 251,160 3,351,020 6,352 2,508,578 114,283 189,822 959,301 519,331 1,439,738 2,671 410,648 38,087 331,721 131,017 329,631 280,351 103,182 16,357 29,949 Budget Forecast FY 2011 FY 2011 30,845,977 $ 32,159,529 2,042,007 2,050,730 0 69,669 5,380 3,500 134,582 13,442 2,542,132 2,559,402 4,401,538 4,301,164 5,210,136 5,948,083 0 0 0 (1,131,660) Budget FY 2012 $ 31,777,435 2,100,810 0 3,860 61,987 2,588,325 4,600,521 6,452,755 0 0 Projected Projected FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 32,092,063 S 33,054,825 2,121,921 2,185,579 0 0 3,899 3,938 63,227 65,124 Z613,942 2,692,361 4,861,933 5,140,817 6,621,172 6,789,350 0 0 0 0 45,181,752 $ 1,064,227 $ 315,460 2,572,221 5,500 2,005,810 94,342 209,125 738,292 724,636 1,805,624 4,150 269,634 46,368 303,589 133,217 311,110 307,344 106,905 15,970 35,196 45,973,859 $ 47,585,694 $ 43,378,157 $ 49,931,992 1,136,029 285,110 2,722,419 5,500 1,976,510 95,790 197,275 793,825 758,240 1,623,483 6,845 365,654 45,017 309,343 174,500 281,450 307,991 107,455 14,500 41,040 $ 1,154,472 313,310 2,662,812 3,000 1,976,554 96,560 169,450 721,934 659,793 2,001,951 5,100 284,575 45,913 305,531 184,725 274,550 305,992 107,305 14,320 34,794 $ 1,177,561 319,576 2,716,068 3,060 2,016,085 98,491 172,839 736,373 672,989 2,102,048 5,202 290,266 46,831 311,642 1138,420 280,041 312,112 109,451 14,606 35,490 $ 1,212,888 329,164 2,797,550 3,152 2,076,568 101,446 178,024 758,464 693,178 2,312,253 5,358 298,974 48,236 320,991 194,072 288,442 321,475 112,735 15,045 36,555 208 Expense Object 52330 Computer Supplies 52340 Computer Equipment - Non-Capit 52360 Grounds Supplies 52370 Photo & Video Supplies 52380 PublicationslTraining Supplies 52390 Administrative Supplies 52400 Furniture & Office Equipment • Subtotal 52000 Supplies 53060 Electric Usage 53070 Natural Gas Usage 53080 Water Usage 53270 Telephone Usage Subtotal 53000 Usage 54010 Postage 54050 Office System Sen ices 54060 Printing Services 54100 Travel Expenses 54120 Photo Services 54140 Training Programs/Seminar Fees 54180 Courier And Freight 54190 Property & Other Space Rental 54400 Judgments & Claims Settlements 54520 Professional Service 54530 Building Repairs & Services 54540 Janitorial Services 54550 Grounds Services 54560 Motor Vehicle Services 54570 Machinery & Equipment Services 54580 Equipment Rental METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Operations Department Actual Actual Budget FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 46,156 36,699 36,265 0 46,610 7,400 26,227 18,844 25,100 3,736 1,304 2,660 6,572 7,387 9,249 5,822 7,069 7,896 0 5,427 2,500 Forecast FY 2011 34,985 7,400 26,300 2,256 8,173 8,684 2,500 Budget FY 2012 Projected FY 2013 36,623 7,434 24,480 2,403 7,757 8,664 2,550 Projected FY 2014 37,722 7,657 25,214 2,475 7,990 8,924 2,627 $ 10,515,623 $ 12,196,306 $ 11,159,789 $ 11,338,274 $ 8,371,582 $ 8,904,991 $ 9,7135,480 5 10,082,641 2,780,021 2,017,505 2,897,739 2,489,470 433,958 437,671 481,827 480,917 233,281 299,224 311,790 310,537 $ 11,818,842 $ 11,659,391 $ 13,476,836 $ 13,363,565 $ 229 $ 220 $ 540 28,350 27,386 11,570 6,401 2,304 6,960 62,317 40,788 43,956 0 0 60 29,789 93,497 55,560 98,004 116,446 96,610 12,974 12,346 12,705 0 153 0 16,573 1,146 7,500 421,387 1,207,838 1,020,194 1,026,450 1,031,944 1,135,580 429,462 660,166 544,887 238,407 261,648 230,050 1,974,216 2,615,835 1,790,944 296,540 349,831 268,982 $ 520 15,422 4,860 34,502 60 72,690 95,791 12,718 0 7,500 975,844 1,024,102 515, 212,250 1,773,471 307,532 $ 11,410,788 $ 10,361,272 2,457,267 482,954 338,219 $ 11,699,062 $ 10,879,336 2,580,131 492,613 344,984 $ 12,197,178 11,967,269 2,709,137 507,391 355,333 $ 13,639,713 $ 500 15,970 5,300 45,623 60 52,825 98,916 13,102 0 370,815 895,525 907,009 515,343 232,050 1,645,030 253,812 $ 14,297,063 $ 510 16,289 5,406 46,535 61 53,881 100,894 13,364 0 378,231 913,435 925,150 525,650 236,691 1,677,931 258, 991 $ 15,539,131 $ 525 16,778 5,568 47,931 63 55,498 103,921 13,765 0 389,578 940,839 952,904 541,419 243,792 1,728,269 266,655 209 Expense Object 54590 Sewer Rep & Structure Cleaning 54600 Electrical Repair Services 54610 Instrument Repair Services 54620 Plumbing Services 54630 HVAC Services 54640 Damage Repairs & Services 54650 Waste Hauling 54660 Ash Hauling 54670 Other Governmental Fees 54680 Laboratory Testing Services 54690 Safety Services 54700 Asbestos Removal Services 54720 Tree Removaffiked Spraying Subtotal 54000 Contractual Services 55010 Land Purchases 55020 Building Purchases 55030 Structural Improvements 55040 Processing Equipment 55050 Auxiliary Equipment 55060 Motor Vehicles 55070 Machinery & Implements 55080 Instruments & Apparatus 55090 Furniture & Office Equipment 55110 Computer Equipment Subtotal 55000 Capital Outlay METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Fiscal 2012 General Fund Budget and Two Year Projection Operations Department Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 982,707 932,216 1,308,820 1,537,220 225,356 413,999 419,427 443,248 382,719 168,563 242,806 261,574 56,142 69,632 115,440 111,673 69,841 160,567 398,940 418,350 75,; : 74,343 25,900 25,900 1,552,642 1,706,569 1,737,774 1,653,336 308,400 293,187 443,000 465,000 577,355 615,164 637,676 658,014 2,658 4,238 7,350 3,750 33,990 54,406 68,750 80,405 6,805 10,077 11,000 13,000 249,159 190,860 248,600 246,600 Budget FY 2012 1,736,251 377,542 510,754 134,660 267,940 25,900 1,828,059 280,000 640,004 488,169 82,718 11,000 244,600 Projected FY 2013 1,770,976 385,093 520,969 137,353 273,299 26,418 1,864,620 285,600 652,804 497,932 84,372 11,220 249,492 Projected FY 2014 1,824,105 396,646 536,598 141,474 281,498 27,211 1,920,559 294,168 672,388 512,870 86,904 11,557 256,977 $ 9,164,741 $ 11,115,368 $ 10,896,580 $ 10,971,220 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 30,793 0 0 0 32,971 100,000 458,252 381,789 419,600 23,707 2,750 15,000 2,621,778 1,740,072 1,110,000 519,671 281,701 785,500 66,592 54,335 115,100 34,483 40,350 13,750 144,979 104,627 34,000 $ 0 0 100,000 351,600 0 1,050,000 851,767 97,100 7,950 17,800 $ 11,679,477 $ 0 0 69,500 365,000 0 1,674,000 303,500 235,385 13,600 401,100 $ 11,913,066 $ 0 0 70,890 372,300 0 1,707,480 309,570 240,093 13,872 409,122 $ 12,270,4513 $ 0 0 73,017 3133,469 0 1,758,704 318,857 247,295 14,288 421,396 $ 3,900,255 $ 2,638,595 $ 2,592,950 $ 2,476,217 Total General Fund Expenses $ 77,181,288 $ 81,995,882 $ 83,307,907 $ 64,123,135 $ 3,062,085 $ 87,377,757 $ 3,123,327 $ 89,410,675 $ 3,217,027 $ 93,155,785 210 These funds were established to account for proceeds from the wastewater and stormwater user charges of the District. These revenues provide for the operation, maintenance and improvement of the District's sewer infrastructure. 211 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 REVENUE TRENDS REVENUE FUNDS CONSOLIDATED ($ 000) Il II II k �0 Fy WW User Charge Revenue Stormwater User Charge This analysis of MSD's revenues compares actual revenues received in 2009 and 2010, a forecast for 2011, budget for 2012, and projections for the years 2013 and 2014. All user charge revenue is recorded in the Revenue Funds. A portion of the revenue is transferred to the General Fund to cover daily operating, maintenance, and replacement costs, the remainder of the revenue is transferred to the Construction Funds for replacement projects, the Special Fund for the Water Backup Insurance & Reimbursement Program, the Emergency Fund for emergencies, and the Debt Service Fund to retire bonds issued for capital improvements. An annual wastewater rate increase beginning in FY 2008 through FY 2012 was approved by the Board of Trustees, increasing the wastewater revenue from approximately $207 million to $224 million annually. An impervious based stormwater user charge was implemented in FY 2009 but invalidated by the court in FY 2011. In response, the previous stormwater user charge and ad valorem taxes were reinstated resulting in a significantly lower revenue. 212 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE REVENUE FUNDS CONSOLIDATED is coo) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenues: Wastewater User Charges $ 206,399 $ 204,489 $ 213,840 $ 213,751 $ 224,321 $ 224,321 $ 224,321 Stormwater User Charges 39,753 43,105 4,910 6,077 1,359 1,359 1.359 Interest on Investments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connection and Other Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 246,152 $ 247,594 $ 218,750 $ 219,828 $ 225,680 $ 225,680 $ 225,680 Expenditures: 0 & M Allocation to General Fund $ 158,429 $ 138,499 $ 128,330 $ 129,129 $ 138,912 $ 135,126 $ 143,541 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures$ 158,429 $ 138,499 $ 128,330 $ 129,129 $ 138,912 $ 135,126 $ 143,541 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 87,723 $ 109,095 S 00,420 $ 90,699 $ 86,768 $ 90,554 $ 82,139 Transfers From (To) $ (87,723) $ (109,095) $ (90,420) $ (90,699) $ (86,768) $ (90,554) $ (82,139) Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 213 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ Revenues: Wastewater User Charges WW User Charges - Adjustments Interest on Investments Connection and Other Fees Miscellaneous $ Total Revenues $ Expenditures: 0 & M Allocation to General Fund $ Construction & Engineering Other Total Expenditures $ Net Operating Income (Loss) $ Interfund Transfers From (To): Emergency Fund (4122) $ Water Backup Insurance & Reimb. (4104) WW Revenue Bond Service Fund (2804) WW Revenue Bond Service Fund (2808) WW Revenue Bond Service Fund (2810) WW Revenue Bond Service Fund (2812) WW Revenue Bond Service Fund (2814) Capital Improvement Trust Fund (6650) Sanitary Replacement Fund (6660) Improvement Fund (4102) Real Property Fund (4103) Total Interfund Transfers $ Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ Actual FY 2009 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE REVENUE FUNDS WASTEWATER REVENUE FUND • FUND 3306 ($ 000) Actual Budget Forecast FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 206,399 $ 0 0 0 0 204,489 $ 0 0 0 0 213,840 $ 0 0 0 0 213,751 $ 0 0 0 0 0$ 0$ 0 224,321 $ 224,321 $ 224,321 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 206,399 $ 204,489 $ 127,752 $ 104,144 $ 0 0 0 0 127,752 $ 104,144 $ 78,647 $ 100,345 $ 213,840 $ 213,751 $ 123,420 $ 124,219 $ 0 0 0 0 123,420 $ 124,219 $ 90,420 $ 89,532 $ 0 $ (2,300) $ (500) $ (5,000) (7,200) (3,000) (20,909) (24,281) (33,741) (7,207) (2,589) (2,902) (707) (1,632) (344) 0 0 (4,978) 0 0 0 0 11 0 (44,824) (62,354) (43,686) 0 0 (1,269) 0 0 0 (500) $ (3,000) (34,521) (2,902) (344) (3,310) 0 (0) (43,686) (1,269) 0 224,321 $ 224,321 $ 224,321 138,912 $ 135,126 $ 143,541 0 0 0 0 0 0 138,912 $ 135,126 $ 143,541 85,409 $ 89,195 $ 80.780 (250) $ (250) $ (250) (1,000) (3,000) (3,000) (37,537) (39,757) (36,775) (2,902) (2,902) (2,902) (410) (477) (544) (3,310) (3,310) (3,310) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (39,000) (38,000) (32,000) (1,000) (1,500) (2,000) 0 0 0 (78,647) $ (100,345) $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ (90,420) $ (89,532) $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ (85,409) $ (89,195) $ (80,780) 0$ 0$ 0 0$ 0$ 0 214 RESIDENTIAL Metered Single Family Less: Low Income Assistance Credits Unmetered Single Family Rooms Water Closets Baths Separate Showers Less: Law Income Assistance Credits Metered Multifamily Unmetered Multifamily Rooms Water Closets Baths Separate Showers Subtotal RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL Non-residential Extra Strength Surcharges Suspended Solids over 300 ppm BOD's over 300 ppm COD's over 600 ppm Subtotal NON-RESIDENTIAL Metropolitan St Louis Sewer District Projected User Charge Revenue WASTEWATER REVENUE FUND (3306) FY 2012 BUDGET Number of Accounts Projected Billed Annual (Annualized) Volume Proposed Charges Base F 3,636,500 24,450,660 Ccf $ 11.85 20,630 128,510 5.93 686,230 3,987,641 993,139 776,370 135,757 8,830 11.85 5.93 248,630 8,913,200 Ccfs 11.85 231,570 11.85 2,499,890 627,340 583,840 25,590 Compliance Siservice Volume Sfunitl Projected Revenue $ 2.11 $ 94,683,400 1,055 (257,800) 1.38 5.15 4.30 4.30 1.12 8,131,800 5,502,900 5,114,700 3,338,400 583,800 (145,900) 2,11 21,753,100 12 5.15 4.30 4.30 2,744,100 3,449,800 3,230,800 2,510,500 110,000 Percent of Total $ 150,749,600 672% 298,660 25,324,390 Ccf $ 11.85 $ 31.95 $ 2.11 $ 66,515,800 8,260 Tons 7,040 Tons 2,510 Tons 2312 620.14 310.07 1,911,000 4,365,800 T78,300 $ 73,570,900 32.8% TOTAL WASTEWATER USER CHARGE REVENUE $ 224,320,500 100.0% 215 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE REVENUE FUNDS STORMWATER REVENUE FUND • FUND 3307 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 0$ 0$ OS 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 Revenues: Stormwater User Charges $ 39,753 $ 43,105 $ 4,910 $ 6,077 $ 1,359 $ 1,359 $ 1,359 SW User Charge Credits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW User Charge Adjustments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest an Investments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connection and Other Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 39,753 $ 43,105 $ 4,910 $ 6,077 $ 1,359 $ 1,359 $ 1,359 Expenditures: 0 & M Allocation to General Fund $ 30,677 $ 34,355 $ 4,910 $ 4,910 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 30,677 $ 34,355 $ 4,910 $ 4,910 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 9,076 $ 8,750 $ 0 $ 1,167 $ 1,359 $ 1,359 $ 1,359 Interfund Transfers From (TolFrom): Stormwater Emergency Fund (4123) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ (250) $ (250) $ (250) Districtwide Stormwater Fund (5110) 0 0 0 0 (1,109) (1,109) (1,109) SW Replacement Fund (6700) (9,076) (8,750) 0 (1,167) 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ (9,076) $ (8,750) $ 0 $ (1,167) $ (1,359) $ (1,359) $ (1,359) Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 216 Metropolitan St, Louis Sewer District Projected User Charge Revenue STORMWATER REVENUE FUND (3307) FY 2012 BUDGET Accounts! Proposed Projected Percent Units Charges Revenue of Total Slservice RESIDENTIAL Single Family 4,322,730 $ 0.24 $ 1,037,500 Less: Low Income Assistance Credits 29,460 0.12 (3,535) Multi Family Subtotal RESIDENTIAL 1,406,340 0.18 253,100 $ 1,287,065 94.7% NON-RESIDENTIAL Commercial 298,660 0.24 71,700 Subtotal NON-RESIDENTIAL LEVEE DISTRICT CREDIT TOTAL STORMWATER USER CHARGE REVENUE $ 71,700 5.3% 0 0.00 0 $ 0 0.0% $ 1,358,765 217 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 218 These funds were established to receive and disburse proceeds from revenue sources restricted for construction of improvements to sewerage and drainage collection systems and treatment facilities. Changes in Fund Balance: Capital improvement projects are continued from previous budget years due to difficulties in easement acquisitions, permit process, design revisions or special requirements. Funding sources for Capital Improvement projects is primarily from User Charges, Revenue Bonds, Grants and Investment Income. Refer to the Capital Improvement & Replacement Program Summary section for a complete listing of the continued projects. 219 REVENUE TRENDS CONSTRUCTION FUNDS CONSOLIDATED ($ 000) $140,000 S110,000 $80,000 $50,000 $20,000 ($10,000) ($40,000) User Charge Revenue Revenue Bonds & Short-term Debt Grant Income Interest, Fees, Misc. Fund Balance Used for Rmenue Change in Fund Balance This analysis compares actual funds received in 2009 and 2010, a forecast for 2011, budget for 2012, and projections for the years 2013 and 2014. User charge revenue for the Construction Fund is allocated from the Wastewater Revenue Fund. Budgeted and projected interest income is based on a 2.00% interest rate on beginning fund balances unless cash balances are expected to be materially different from fund balances. In February 2004, the voters approved the authorization to issue $500 million in revenue bonds in order to continue the multi -decade capital needs program for construction of improvements to sewerage collection systems and treatment facilities. $336 million of the authorized bonds were issued in April and May 2004, $6.8 million in FY 2005, $43.4 million in FY 2006, $73.8 million in FY 2007 and the remaining $40 million in FY 2008 in the form of Commercial Paper. Fund balance of $73.3 million was used during FY 2009 depleting all authorized revenue bond proceeds. In August 2008 voters approved an additional $275 million in revenue bonds. $30 million was used in FY 2009 and $115 million in FY 2010. The District plans to issue $84 million in FY 2011 and $40 million in FY 2012. 220 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS CONSOLIDATED IS 000I Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 90,277 $ 61,279 $ 97,328 $ 95,935 $ 66,255 $ 4,981 $ 3,973 Revenues: Capital Improvement Surcharge Refund $ 3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenue Bonds & Notes 70,853 112,000 89,000 83,800 40,000 0 0 Lease Hold Revenue Bonds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 9,073 5,283 910 4,340 497 37 30 Grant Income 0 0 3 0 0 955 0 Connection and Other Fees 142 119 250 160 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 26 4,076 300 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 80,097 $ 121,478 $ 90,463 $ 88,300 $ 40,497 S 992 $ 30 Expenditures: Construction & Engineering $ 166,230 $ 157,178 $ 118,706 $ 155,101 $ 140,771 $ 40,000 $ 32,000 Other (1,885) 82 (2,000) 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 164,344 $ 157,260 $ 116,706 $ 155,101 $ 140,771 $ 40,000 $ 32,000 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (84,247) $ (35,782) $ (26,243) $ (66,801) $ (100,274) $ (39,008) $ (31,970) Transfers From (To) $ 55,250 $ 70,438 $ 37,127 $ 37,120 $ 39,000 $ 38,000 $ 32,000 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (28,997) $ 34,656 $ 10,884 $ (29,681) $ (61,274) $ (1,008) $ 30 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 61,279 $ 95,935 $ 108,212 $ 66,255 $ 4,981 $ 3,973 $ 4,003 - 221 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS CAULKS CREEK CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT - FUND 6610 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2914 $ 5,996 $ 1,086 $ 1,290 $ 1,290 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenues: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Interest on Investments 298 91 13 150 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connection and Other Fees 142 119 250 160 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 440 $ 210 $ 263 $ 310 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: Construction & Engineering $ 5,350 $ 6 $ 300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 5,350 $ 6 $ 300 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (4,910) $ 204 $ (37) $ 310 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfers From (To) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ (1,600) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (4,910) $ 204 $ (37) $ (1,290) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 1,086 $ 1,290 $ 1,253 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 222 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWR DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS WILLIAMS CREEK CONSTRUCTION FUND • 6620 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 532 $ 555 $ 564 $ 564 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenues: Interest on Investments $ 23 $ 9 $ 5 $ 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connection and Other Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 23 $ 9 $ 5 $ 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: Construction & Engineering $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 23 $ 9 $ 5 $ 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfers From (To) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ (569) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 23 $ 9 $ 5 $ (564) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 555 $ 564 $ 569 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 223 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND • FUND 6650 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 8$ 11$ 0$ 0$ 0$ OS 0 Revenues: Capital Improvement Surcharge Refund S 3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Interest on Investments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Connection and Other Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: Construction & Engineering $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 3 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfers From (To) (0101) $ 0 $ (11) $ 0 $ 0 $ D $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 3 $ (11) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 11 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ o $ 0 224 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS SANITARY REPLACEMENT FUND • FUND 6660 (S 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 83,741 S 54,997 $ 86,718 $ 86,493 $ 66,255 $ 4,981 $ 3,973 Revenues: Proceeds from Revenue Bonds $ 65,853 $ 112,000 $ 89,000 $ 83,800 $ 40,000 $ 0 $ 0 Lease Hold Revenue Bonds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 8,494 4,929 805 4,050 497 37 30 Grant Income 0 0 3 0 0 955 0 Connection and Other Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 26 3,780 300 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 74,373 $ 120,709 $ 90,108 $ 87,850 $ 40,497 $ 992 $ 30 Expenditures: Construction & Engineering $ 155,061 $ 151,780 $ 118,122 $ 155,374 $ 140,771 $ 40,000 $ 32,000 Other (6,719) 82 (2,000) 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 148,342 S 151,862 $ 116,122 $ 155,374 $ 140,771 $ 40,000 S 32,000 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (73,969) S (31,153) $ (26,014) $ (67,524) $ (100,274) $ (39,008) $ (31,970) Interfund Transfers From (To): Wastewater Revenue Fund (306) $ 44,824 $ 62,354 $ 43,686 $ 43,686 $ 39,000 $ 38,000 $ 32,000 General Fund (101) 4,600 0 2,000 2,000 0 0 0 Waterbackup (104) (4,600) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Real Property (103) 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 Caulks Creek (6610) 0 0 0 1,600 0 0 0 Clauton Central (5563) 0 190 0 0 0 0 0 Fountain Creek (5569) 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Upper Paddock Creek (5585) 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Wedgewood Creek (5588) 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ 45,224 $ 62,649 $ 45,686 $ 47,286 $ 39,000 $ 38,000 S 32,000 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (28,745) $ 31,496 $ 19,672 $ (20,238) $ (61,274) $ (1,008) $ 30 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 54,997 $ 86,493 $ 106,390 $ 66,255 $ 4,981 $ 3,973 $ 4,003 225 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER: 6660 FUND NAME: SANITARY REPLACEMENT FUND Project Type Project Description Federal State Local Other MSD Cost Infrastructure BAUMGARTNER & BLACK FOREST SANITARY REPLACEMENT PHASE I 0 0 0 0 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 CSO- GREENBRIARCOMBINEDSEWERSEPARATION 0 0 0 0 360,000 360,000 WATERSHED FACILITY PLANNING PHASE II 0 0 0 0 5,000,000 5,000,000 SEPARATE SEWER AREA - INFLOW/INFILTRATION ASSESSMENT(FY2008) 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 COMBINED SEWER AREA- INFILTRATIONIINFLOWASSESSMENT (FY2008) 0 0 0 0 4,000,000 4,000,000 BISSELL& LEMAYWWTPDISINFECTION FACILITIES 0 0 0 0 1,150,000 1,150,000 BISSELL & LEMAY WWTP DISINFECTION FACILITIES 0 0 0 0 23,900,000 23,900,000 CCTV INSPECTION AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF SEWERS - NORTH 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 CCTV INSPECTION AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF SEWERS- SOUTH 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 CSO • CLAYTONIA TERRACE AND DALE AVE CSO INTERCEPTOR (I-101A, 10161E-126,127) SEPARATION 0 0 0 0 700,000 700,000 CHAI HOUSE PUMP STATION (P-747) ELIMINATION 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 COLDWATER TREATMENT PLANT DISINFECTION FACILITIES 0 0 0 0 570,000 570,000 COLDWATER TREATMENT PLANT DISINFECTION FACILITIES 0 0 0 0 7,100,000 7,100,000 DC-06 DEER CREEK SANITARY RELIEF PHASE III AND Ill REDUCTION 0 0 0 0 400,000 400,000 EASEMENT ACQUISITION FOR COMBINED /SANITARY PROJECTS (FY 2012) 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 ELTON PUMP STATION (P-307) ELIMINATION 0 0 0 0 310,000 310,000 FOREST VALLEY ODOR CONTROL PHASE II (INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR) 0 0 0 0 260,000 260,000 HERMITAGE III REDUCTION (SKME-615) 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR 1/087P CAULKS CREEK "A" (P•750) PHASE V 0 0 0 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIRS (SANITARYICOMBINED-FY2012) 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIRS(REHABILITATION)(FY2012) 0 0 0 0 15,000,000 15,000,000 LEMAY WWTP DISINFECTION FACILITIES 0 0 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 LEMAYWWTP DISINFECTION FACILITIES 0 0 0 0 20,000,000 20,000,000 LEMAYWWTP MAINTENANCE BUILDING STRUCTURAL REPAIR 0 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 MISSOURI RIVER WWTP SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AND DISINFECTION FACILITIES 0 0 0 0 40,000,000 40,000,000 RADAR RAINFALL DATA (FY2011) 0 0 0 0 130,000 130,000 SPRINGDALE LATERAL SANITARY RELIEF (SKME-305) 0 0 0 0 220,000 220,000 DELLWOOD SANITARY TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION 0 0 0 0 750,000 750,000 ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM - CORPS OF ENGINEERS 0 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 GRAND GLAIZE WWTP BRIDGE REPAIRS 0 0 0 0 66,000 66,000 CLAYRIDGE- BRANDYSANITARYRELIEF 0 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 LOWER & MIDDLE RDP CSO CONTROLS 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 DEER CREEK SANITARY PROGRAM 0 0 0 0 600,000 600,000 NECTAR Ill REDUCTION (BP-290) 0 0 0 0 435,000 435,000 EDGEWOODSANITARY RELIEF (BP-592)(BP-301) 0 0 0 0 870,000 870,000 GRAND GLAIZE LAGOON WET WEATHER STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 $140,771,000 $140,771,000 226 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE CONSTRUCTION FUNDS STORMWATER REPLACEMENT FUND • FUND 6700 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET* Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 0 S 4,631 $ 8,756 $ 7,589 $ 0 S 0 $ 0 Revenues: Revenue Bonds & Notes $ 5,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Interest on Investments 258 254 87 135 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connection and Other Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 296 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 5,258 $ 550 $ 87 $ 135 S 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: Construction & Engineering $ 5,819 $ 5,392 $ 284 $ (273) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Other 4,834 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 10,653 S 5,392 $ 284 $ (273) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (5,395) $ (4,842) $ (197) $ 408 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfers From (To) -SW Revenue fund (3307) $ 9,076 S 8,750 $ 0 $ 1,167 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfers From (To) -General Fund (1101) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers From (To) -SW Emergency Fund (4123) 0 0 (500) (500) 0 0 0 Transfers from (To) -Various OMCI Funds 950 (950) (8,059) (8,664) 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ 10,026 $ 7,800 $ (8,559) $ (7,997) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 4,631 $ 2,958 $ (8,756) $ (7,589) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. S 4,631 $ 7,589 $ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0 *This fund is no longer needed; with the Court's overruling of the impervious based stormwater service charge there is no revenue source. 227 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 228 OPERATION, MAINTENANCE and CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS These funds were established to account for proceeds from tax levies in the various subdistricts and grants in aid of construction. Expenditures are primarily for stormwater sewer improvements. In budget ,year FY09 the District implemented an impervious based stormwater charge which allowed the subdistrict taxes to be reduced to zero. A class action suit against the impervious based stormwater user charge resulted in the charge being found unconstitutional. As a consequence, the subdistrict taxes were reinstated in FY 2011. Taxes collected in the various subdistricts must be spent within that particular subdistrict. The levied tax rates range from $.04 to $.10 per $100 of assessed property, valuation. In order to finance large stormwater and infrastructure projects, taxes are held in fund balance until there is sufficient tax revenue accumulated to cover the costs of these projects. 229 REVENUE TRENDS OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS CONSOLIDATED ($ 000) $28,000 $18,000 ROW ($2,000) ($12,000) 1 inn 1111111111 PM �9 011 p10 cy4 "011 �y2 o1i 01, o1A User Charge Revenue Taxes Grant Income Interest, Fees, Misc. Fund Balance Used for Revenue Change in Fund Balance This analysis compares actual funds received in 2009 and 2010, a forecast for 2011, budget for 2012, and projections for the years 2013 and 2014. A portion of the Stormwater Capital Improvement and Replacement projects are funded by the Operation, Maintenance and Construction Improvement ad valorem taxes. These are projects that benefit specific geographic areas known as subdistricts, The District currently taxes 210MCI Subdistricts, of which 19 are stormwater specific. Beginning in FY 2009, all ad valorem tax rates were reduced to zero due to the implementation of a new stormwater impervious rate. The new rate was ruled invalid in August 2010 resulting in the ad valorem taxes being reinstated. Infrastructure and Stormwater projects are largely funded through prior year taxes collected and held in fund balances. 230 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS CONSOLIDATED ($ 000) FUND BALANCE B.O.P. S Revenues: Taxes Tax Revenue Anticipation Notes Proceeds from Bonds and Notes Interest on Investments Grant Income Miscellaneous Total Revenues $ Expenditures: SW Labor SW Equipment SW Supplies SW Overhead Judgement & Claims Accrual Construction & Engineering Other Total Expenditures $ Net Operating Income (Loss) $ Interfund Transfers From (To): General Fund (1101) Tax General Fund (1101) Stormwater Revenue (3307) Sanitary Replacement Fund (6660) Stormwater Replacement (6700) Willimas Creek (6620) Between OMCI Funds Interfund Transfers Increase (Decrease) in fund Bal. Actual Actual Budget Forecast FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 0 $ $77 $ $3 $ ($148) S $20,396 $ $37,876 $ $53,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,829 4,829 0 0 0 0 (78) (10) 0 0 (78) $ (10) $ 4,829 $ 4,829 S 78 $ 10 $ (4,829) $ (4,829) S 0 $ 0 $ 15,242 $ 14,626 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (295) 0 0 (950) 950 8,059 8,664 0 0 0 569 0 0 0 0 0 $ (235) $ 24,816 $ 25,373 S 78 (225) 19,987 20,544 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$ 0$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$ 0$ 0 14,371 $ 2,000 1,109 0 0 0 0 17,480 $ 17,480 14,515 $ 14,805 0 0 1,109 1,109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,624 $ 15,914 15,624 15,914 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ $77 $ ($148) S $19,990 $ $20,396 $ $37,876 $ $53,500 $ $69,415 231 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS DISTRICTWIDE STORMWATER • FUND 5110 (S 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,080 $ 1,412 S 220 Revenues: Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 0 0 0 0 11 14 2 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 11 $ 14 S 2 Expenditures: SW Labor S 0 $ 0 $ 5,276 $ 5,276 $ 5,276 $ 5,009 S 4,315 SW Equipment 0 0 557 557 557 530 456 SW Supplies 0 0 77 77 77 73 63 SW Overhead 0 0 2,339 2,339 2,339 2,220 1,914 Judgement & Claims Accrual 0 0 4,829 4,829 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 S 13,078 $ 13,078 $ 8,249 $ 7,831 $ 6,748 Net Operating Income (Loss) S 0 $ 0 $ (13,078) $ (13,078) $ (8,238) $ (7,817) $ (6,746) Interfund Transfers From (To): General Fund (1101) TAX $ 0 $ 0 $ 5,826 S 5,492 $ 5,461 $ 5,516 $ 5,626 General Fund (1101) Fund Transfer 0 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 Stormwater Revenue (3307) 0 0 0 0 1,109 1,109 1,109 Stonnwater Replacement (6700) 0 0 8,059 8,664 0 0 0 OMCI Funds 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ 0 $ 0 S 13,887 $ 14,158 $ 8,570 $ 6,625 $ 6,735 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 0 $ 0 $ 809 $ 1,080 $ 332 $ (1,192) S (11) FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 0 $ 0 $ 809 $ 1,080 $ 1,412 $ 220 S 208 232 FUND BALANCE B4O,P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS STORMWATER OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE - FUND 5130 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 0 S 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,013 $ 5,832 $ 8,207 Revenues: Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 0 0 0 0 30 58 82 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 30 $ 58 $ B2 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 2.382 $ 2,382 $ 2,382 $ 2,726 $ 3,574 SW Equipment 0 0 1,763 1,763 1,763 1,814 1,934 SW Supplies 0 0 285 285 285 293 310 SW Overhead 0 0 1,691 1,691 1,691 1,850 2,238 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,121 $ 6,121 $ 6,121 $ 6,682 $ 8,056 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 0 $ 0 $ (6,121) $ (6,121) $ (6,091) $ (6,624) $ (7,974) Interfund Transfers From (To): General Fund (1101) Tax $ 0 $ 0 $ 9.416 $ 9,134 S 8,910 $ 8,999 $ 9,179 OMCI Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total lnterfundTransfers $ 0 $ 0 $ 9.416 S 9,134 S 8,910 $ 8,999 $ 9,179 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,295 $ 3,013 $ 2,819 $ 2,375 $ 1,205 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 0 $ 0 $ 3.295 $ 3,013 $ 5,832 $ 8,207 $ 9,412 233 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS CONSOLIDATED (LESS DISTRICTWIDE OMCI FUNDS) ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ o Revenues: Taxes $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 0 Tax Revenue Anticipation Notes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proceeds from Bonds and Notes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues S 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Judgement & Claims Accrual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other (78) (10) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ (78) $ (10) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 78 $ 10 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Interfund transfers From (To): General Fund (1101) Tax $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 General Fund (1101) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stormwater Revenue (3307) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sanitary Replacement (6660) 0 (295) 0 0 0 0 0 Stormwater Replacement (6700) (950) 950 0 0 0 0 0 Willimas Creek (6620) 0 0 0 569 0 0 0 Between OMCI Funds 0 0 (2) (2) 0 0 0 Interfund Transfers S 0 $ (235) $ 1,513 $ 2,081 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 78 $ (225) $ 1,513 $ 2,081 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ $77 $ ($225) $ $1,513 $ $2,082 $ $0 $ $1 $ $0 234 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. Revenues: Taxes Interest on Investments Grant Income Miscellaneous Expenditures: SW Labor SW Equipment SW Supplies SW Overhead Construction & Engineering Other Net Operating Income (Loss) METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS CLAYTON • CENTRAL • FUND 5563 ($ 000) Actual FY 2009 Actual Budget Forecast FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 2,186 $ 2,285 $ 2,139 $ 2.140 S 2,454 $ Total Revenues $ $ Total Expenditures $ $ Transfer Froml(To) Sanitary Replacement Fund $ Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 5 94 0 0 100 $ 0 45 0 0 45 $ 349 22 0 0 371 $ 339 21 0 0 360 S 0 25 0 0 25 $ 1,953 $ 1,641 0 20 0 0 20 $ 0 16 0 0 16 0 $ 0 $ 19 $ 19 S 19 $ 19 $ 20 0 0 13 13 13 13 13 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 13 13 13 13 13 1 0 0 0 480 285 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 $ 0 $ 46 $ 46 $ 526 $ 331 $ 47 98 $ 45 $ 325 $ 314 $ (501) $ (311) $ (31) 0$ (190) $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 98 S (145) $ 325 $ 314 $ (501) $ (311) $ (31) FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 2,285 $ 2,140 $ 2,464 $ 2,454 $ 1,953 $ 1,641 $ 1,610 235 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER: 5563 FUND NAME: CLAYTON CENTRAL OMCI ProiectType ProiectDescdption Federal State Local Other MSD Cost Infrastructure MERAMEC AND FOREST PARK PARKWAY SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 0 0 $480,000 $480,000 $480,000 S480,000 236 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS COLDWATER CREEK - FUND 5564 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 5,907 $ 5,803 $ 3,416 $ 3,416 $ 5,897 $ 6,022 $ 6,260 Revenues: Taxes $ 47 $ 24 $ 2,255 $ 2,187 $ 1.972 $ 1,992 $ 2,032 Interest on Investments 284 116 54 34 59 60 63 Grant Income 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 393 $ 140 $ 2,309 $ 2,221 $ 2.031 $ 2,052 $ 2,095 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 284 $ 284 $ 284 $ 287 $ 293 SW Equipment 0 0 194 194 194 196 200 SW Supplies 0 0 26 26 26 26 27 SW Overhead 0 0 193 193 193 195 199 Construction & Engineering 825 2,527 1,616 1,022 1,209 1,110 0 Other (328) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 497 $ 2,527 $ 2,313 $ 1,719 $ 1,906 $ 1,814 $ 718 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (104) $ (2,387) $ (4) $ 502 $ 125 $ 238 $ 1,377 Interfund Transfers From (To) Lynn Haven OMCI Fund 5575 $ 0 $ 0 $ 295 $ 295 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Paddock Creek OMCI Fund 5581 0 0 709 708 0 0 0 Upper Paddock Creek OMCI Fund 5585 0 0 336 336 0 0 0 Wedgewood Creek OMCI Fund 5588 0 0 639 640 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,979 $ 1,979 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (104) $ (2,387) $ 1,975 $ 2.481 $ 125 $ 238 $ 1,377 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 5,803 $ 3,416 $ 5,391 $ 5,897 $ 6,022 $ 6,260 $ 7,637 237 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT& REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER: 5564 Project Type Project Description Stormwater LYNN TOWN APARTMENTS CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS (CLD-19) WINDOM #8721 SEWER REHABILITATION COLDWATER CREEK AT LYNN TOWN BANK STABILIZATION WHITE BIRCH WAY - QUEEN ANN DRIVE STORM SEWER FUND NAME: COLDWATER CREEK OMCI Federal State Local Other MSD Cost 0 0 0 0 S435.000 S435,000 0 0 0 0 254.000 254,000 0 0 0 0 400,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 120.000 120,000 S1,209.000 31,209.000 238 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS CREVE COEUR - FRONTENAC • FUND 5565 (� 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 2,714 $ 2,330 $ 1,765 $ 1,765 $ 1.598 $ 1,481 $ 1,361 Revenues: Taxes 3 0 422 409 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 116 47 14 18 16 15 14 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 119 $ 47 $ 436 $ 427 $ 16 $ 15 $ 14 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 52 $ 52 $ 52 $ 53 $ 54 SW Equipment 0 0 42 42 42 42 43 SW Supplies 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 SW Overhead 0 0 37 37 37 37 38 Construction & Engineering 573 612 365 461 0 0 0 Other (70) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 503 $ 612 $ 498 $ 594 $ 133 $ 134 $ 137 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (384) $ (565) $ (62) $ (167) $ (117) $ (119) $ (123) Transfer From Stormwater Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (384) $ (565) $ (62) $ (167) $ (117) $ (119) $ (123) FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 2,330 $ 1,765 $ 1,703 $ 1,598 $ 1,481 $ 1,361 $ 1,238 239 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT Changes in Fund Balance OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS DEER CREEK • FUND 5566 (S 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 8,839 $ 5,716 $ 6,284 $ 6,284 $ 6,812 $ 7,276 $ 8,754 Revenues: Taxes 43 12 3,350 3,250 3,250 3,283 3,350 Interest on Investments 471 120 63 63 68 73 88 Grant Income (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 510 $ 132 $ 3,413 $ 3,313 $ 3,318 $ 3,356 S 3,438 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 S 199 $ 199 $ 199 $ 280 $ 406 SW Equipment 0 0 134 134 134 187 268 SW Supplies 0 0 24 24 24 29 38 SW Overhead 0 0 136 136 136 190 272 Construction & Engineering 3,169 514 3,289 2,292 2,361 1,192 1,000 Other (484) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 2,684 $ 514 $ 3,782 $ 2,785 $ 2,854 $ 1.878 S 1,984 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (2,174) $ (382) $ (369) $ 528 $ 464 $ 1,478 $ 1,454 Transfer From Stormwater Replacement Fund $ (950) $ 950 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (3,124) $ 568 $ (369) $ 528 $ 464 $ 1,478 $ 1,454 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 5,716 S 6,284 S 5,915 $ 6,812 $ 7,276 $ 8,754 $ 10,208 240 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER:5566 FUND NAME: DEER CREEK OMCI ProlectTvoe ProiectDeschDtion Federal State Local Other MSD Cost Stormwater RUTH-HELEN-CECELIASTORM SEWER REPLACEMENT FAWNVALLEY STORM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS MARY AVENUE FLOOD MITIGATION DEER CREEK WATERSHED INITIATIVE 0 0 0 0 S665.000 S665.000 0 0 0 0 996.000 996.000 0 0 0 0 500.000 500.000 0 0 0 0 200.000 200.000 S2,361,000 S2,361.000 241 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS BLACK JACK (DELLWOOD) - FUND 5567 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 267 $ 9 $ 168 $ 168 $ O S 0 $ 0 Revenues: Taxes 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 31 $ 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 S 0 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 295 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other (5) (151) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 290 $ (151) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 S 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (259) $ 159 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfer to Maline Creek OMCI Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ (168) $ (168) $ 0 S 0 S 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (259) $ 159 $ (168) $ (168) $ 0 $ •0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 9 $ 168 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 242 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS FOUNTAIN CREEK - FUND 5569 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 912 $ 717 S 725 $ 725 $ 703 $ 622 $ 358 Revenues: Taxes $ 8 $ 3 $ 143 $ 139 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Interest on Investments 40 9 8 7 7 6 4 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 47 $ 12 $ 151 S 146 $ 7 $ 6 $ 4 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 35 $ 35 $ 35 $ 35 $ 36 SW Equipment 0 0 25 25 25 25 26 SW Supplies 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 SW Overhead 0 0 24 24 24 24 25 Construction & Engineering 287 0 80 80 0 181 0 Other (45) (26) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 242 $ (26) $ 168 $ 168 $ 88 $ 270 $ 91 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (195) $ 38 $ (17) $ (22) $ (81) $ (264) $ (87) Transfer Froml(To) Sanitary Replacement Fund $ 0 $ (30) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (195) $ 8 $ (17) $ (22) $ (81) $ (264) $ (87) FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 717 $ 725 $ 708 $ 703 $ 622 $ 358 $ 272 243 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. Revenues: Taxes Interest on Investments Grant Income Miscellaneous Expenditures: SW Labor SW Equipment SW Supplies SW Overhead Construction & Engineering Other Net Operating Income (Loss) Total Revenues $ METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS GRAVOIS CREEK • FUND 5571 (S 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 6,517 $ 5,805 $ 5,210 $ 5,210 $ 3,831 $ 3,182 $ 2,509 $ 14 S 299 95 0 408 S 2$ 121 47 0 170 $ 1,307 $ 49 0 0 1,356 $ 1,268 $ 52 0 0 1,320 $ 1,268 S 38 0 0 1,306 S 1,280 $ 1,305 32 25 0 0 0 0 1,312 $ 1,330 $ 0 $ 0 $ 185 $ 185 $ 185 S 187 $ 191 0 0 119 119 119 120 123 0 0 18 18 18 18 19 0 0 123 123 123 124 127 1,480 765 2,721 2,254 1,510 1,535 0 (359) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 1,121 $ 765 $ 3,166 $ 2,699 $ 1,955 $ 1,984 $ 458 $ (712) $ (595) $ (1,810) $ (1,379) $ (649) $ (672) $ 872 Transfer From Stormwater Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (712) $ (595) $ (1,810) $ (1,379) $ (649) $ (672) $ 872 FUND BALANCE EDP. $ 5,805 $ 5,210 $ 3,400 $ 3,831 $ 3,182 $ 2.509 S 3,381 244 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 Project Type Project Descriphon Stormwater FILLMORE-ELLIOTBANK STABILIZATION (GCKC-130) DIAMOND HEAD DR. STORM SEWER (GCUC-110) EAST WATSON AND KATHY CT. STORM IMPROVEMENT SOUTH KIRKWOOD ROAD #906 STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT FUND NUMBER:5571 FUND NAME: GRAVOIS CREEK OMCI Federal State Local Other MSD Cost 0 0 0 0 S235,000 $235,000 0 0 0 0 960,000 960,000 0 0 0 0 65,000 65,000 0 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 S1,510,000 S1.510,000 245 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS HWY 67 & CAMBRIA CREEK • FUND 5572 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 129 $ 4 $ 2 S 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenues: Taxes $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 Interest on Investments 5 (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 5 $ (2) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0'' 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 131 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (125) $ (2) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfer to Dislrictwide OMCI $ 0 $ 0 $ (2) $ (2) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (125) $ (2) $ (2) $ (2) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 4 $ 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 246 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS LORETTA-JOPLIN • FUND 5574 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 67 $ 71 $ 73 $ 73 $ 90 $ 107 $ 124 Revenues: Taxes $ 1 $ 1 $ 21 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 21 Interest on Investments 3 1 0 1 1 1 1 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 4 $ 2 $ 21 $ 21 $ 21 $ 21 $ 22 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 SW Equipment 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 4 $ 2 $ 17 $ 17 $ 17 $ 17 $ 18 Transfer From Stormwaler Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 4 $ 2 S 17 $ 17 $ 17 $ 17 $ 18 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 71 $ 73 $ 90 $ 90 $ 107 $ 124 $ 142 247 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS LYNN HAVEN • FUND 5575 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 278 $ 290 $ 295 $ 295 $ 0 S 0 $ 0 Revenues: Taxes S 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0 Interest on Investments 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 12 $ 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 12 $ 5 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 S 0 $ 0 Transfer To Coldwater Creek OMCI Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ (295) $ (295) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. S 12 $ 5 $ (295) $ (295) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. S 290 $ 295 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 248 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS MALINE CREEK • FUND 5576 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 3,479 $ 3,008 S 2,932 $ 2,933 $ 2,900 $ 1,984 $ 2,115 Revenues: Taxes S 51 $ 14 S 881 $ 855 $ 630 $ 636 $ 650 Interest on Investments 159 71 54 47 47 20 21 Grant Income (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 205 $ 85 $ 935 S 902 $ 677 $ 656 $ 671 Expenditures: SW Labor S 0 $ 0 $ 210 S 210 $ 210 $ 212 $ 216 SW Equipment 0 0 143 143 143 144 147 SW Supplies 0 0 23 23 23 23 24 SW Overhead 0 0 144 144 144 145 148 Construction & Engineering 680 160 2,995 583 1,073 0 0 Other (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures S 677 $ 160 $ 3,515 $ 1,103 $ 1,593 $ 525 $ 536 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (472) $ (75) $ (2,580) $ (201) $ (916) $ 131 $ 135 Transfer From OMCI Fund $ 0 $ 0 S 168 S 168 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (472) $ (75) $ (2,412) $ (33) $ (916) $ 131 $ 135 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 3,007 $ 2,933 S 520 $ 2,900 $ 1,984 $ 2,115 $ 2,250 249 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER:5576 FUND NAME: MALINE CREEK OMCI Project Type Project Description Federal Slate Local Other MSD Cost Stormwater SHIREFORD LANE STORM IMPROVEMENT 0 0 0 0 S123,000 $123,000 HARDWICK COURT CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS AND SANITARY SEWER PROTECTION (MCMB I 0 0 0 9 900.000 900,000 BON OAK #10074 - #10078 FLOOD MITIGATION 0 0 0 9 50,000 50,000 S1,073,000 S1,073,000 250 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS MARLBOROUGH • FUND 5577 ($ ow) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 361 $ 361 $ 173 $ 173 $ 0 S 0 S 0 Revenues: Taxes $ 1$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0 Interest on Investments 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 16 $ 4 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 16 192 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 16 $ 192 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 0 $ (188) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfer Fromf(To) OMCI Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ (173) $ (173) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 0 $ (188) $ (173) $ (173) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 361 $ 173 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 251 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS NORTH AFFTON • FUND 5579 ($ o0o) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 209 S 268 $ 154 S 155 $ 201 $ 247 $ 294 Revenues: Taxes $ 1 S 1 $ 58 $ 56 $ 56 $ 57 $ 58 Interest onlnvestments 11 3 0 2 2 2 3 Grant Income 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues S 58 $ 4 $ 58 $ 58 $ 58 $ 59 $ 61 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0$ 0$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5 SW Equipment 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 Construction & Engineering 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 Other (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ (1) $ 117 $ 12 $ 12 $ 12 $ 12 $ 12 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 59 $ (113) $ 46 $ 46 $ 46 $ 47 $ 49 Transfer From Stormwater Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 59 $ (113) $ 46 $ 46 $ 46 $ 47 $ 49 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 268 $ 155 $ 200 $ 201 S 247 $ 294 $ 343 252 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS NORTH KINLOCH • FUND 5580 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 163$ 170$ 170$ 169$ 171 $ 1$ 1 Revenues: Taxes $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 Interest on Investments 7 (1) 1 2 2 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 7 $ (1) $ 1 $ 2 $ 2 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 0 0 164 0 172 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures S 0 $ 0 $ 164 $ 0 $ 172 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) S 7 $ (1) $ (163) $ 2 $ (170) $ 0 $ 0 Transfer From Stormwater Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 7 $ (1) $ (163) $ 2 $ (170) $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 170 $ 169 $ 7 $ 171 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 253 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 Protect Tvae Project Description Stormwater MABLE AVE. AND CARSON ROAD STORM SEWER FUND NUMBER: 5580 FUND NAME: NORTH KINLOCH OMCI Federal Stale Local Other MSD Cost 0 0 0 0 $172,000 $172,000 $172,000 $172,000 254 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS PADDOCK CREEK - FUND 5581 (s 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 739 $ 724 $ 709 $ 708 S 0 S 0 $ 0 Revenues: Taxes $ 6$ 2$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 Interest on Investments 33 12 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 39 $ 14 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 55 30 0 0 0 0 0 Other (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 54 $ 30 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (15) $ (16) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfer To Coldwater Creek OMCI Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ (709) $ (708) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (15) $ (16) $ (709) $ (708) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 724 $ 708 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 S 0 $ 0 255 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS SUGAR CREEK • FUND 5583 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 937 $ 670 $ 381 $ 381 $ 489 $ 661 $ 838 Revenues: Taxes $ 3 $ 2 $ 226 $ 219 $ 219 $ 221 $ 226 Interest on Investments 61 13 4 4 5 8 8 Grant Income (10) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 54 $ 15 $ 230 $ 223 $ 224 S 229 $ 234 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 21 $ 21 $ 21 $ 21 $ 22 SW Equipment 0 0 15 15 15 15 15 SW Supplies 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 SW Overhead 0 0 14 14 14 14 14 Construction & Engineering 322 304 235 63 0 0 0 Other (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 321 $ 304 $ 287 $ 115 $ 52 $ 53 $ 54 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (267) $ (289) $ (57) $ 108 $ 172 $ 176 $ 180 Transfer From Stonnwater Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (267) $ (289) $ (57) $ 108 $ 172 $ 176 $ 180 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 670 $ 381 $ 324 $ 489 $ 661 $ 838 $ 1,018 256 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS UNIVERSITY CITY BRANCH OF RIVER DES PERES • FUND 5584 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 S 4,263 $ 2,842 $ 2,788 $ 2,787 S 2,572 S 2,595 S 2,163 Revenues: Taxes S 33 $ 12 $ 813 $ 789 $ 789 S 797 S 813 Interest on Investments 195 82 24 28 26 26 22 Grant Income 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 461 $ 94 $ 837 $ 817 $ 815 $ 823 $ 835 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 303 $ 303 $ 303 $ 306 $ 312 SW Equipment 0 0 205 205 205 207 211 SW Supplies 0 0 29 29 29 29 30 SW Overhead 0 0 205 205 205 207 211 Construction & Engineering 1,937 149 799 290 50 506 0 Other (54) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 1,883 $ 149 $ 1,541 $ 1,032 $ 792 $ 1,255 $ 764 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (1,421) $ (55) $ (704) $ (215) $ 23 $ (432) $ 71 Transfer From U. City Sewer Improvement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (1,421) $ (55) $ (704) $ (215) $ 23 $ (432) $ 71 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 2,842 $ 2,787 $ 2,084 $ 2,572 $ 2,595 $ 2,163 $ 2,233 257 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 Project Type Project Description Stormwater MAGNET DRIVE STORM SEWER. FUND NUMBER: 5584 FUND NAME: UNIVERSITY CITY OMCI Federal State Local Other MSD Cost 0 0 0 0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 258 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS UPPER PADDOCK CREEK - FUND 5585 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 • FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 342 $ 358 $ 336 $ 336 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenues: Taxes $ 2$ 1$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 Interest on Investments 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 16 $ 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 16 $ 8 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfer To Sanitary Replacement fund 1 OMCI $ 0 $ (30) $ (336) $ (336) $ 0 S 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 16 $ (22) $ (336) $ (336) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 358 $ 336 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 259 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS VINITA PARK • FUND 5586 ($ No) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 57 $ 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Revenues: Taxes $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 Interest on Investments 2 (2) 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 2 $ (2) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 57 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (55) $ (2) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfer from Stormwater Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (55) $ (2) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 260 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS WATKINS CREEK • FUND 5587 (� aoo) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 761 $ 661 $ 418 $ 418 $ 349 $ 435 $ 522 Revenues: Taxes S 7 $ 5 $ 166 $ 161 $ 161 $ 163 $ 166 Interest on Investments 33 12 7 6 5 5 6 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues S 40 $ 17 S 173 $ 167 $ 166 $ 168 $ 172 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33 $ 33 $ 34 SW Equipment 0 0 22 22 22 22 23 SW Supplies 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 SW Overhead 0 0 22 22 22 22 23 Construction & Engineering 141 260 156 156 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 141 $ 260 $ 236 $ 236 $ 80 $ 81 $ 82 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (101) $ (243) $ (63) $ (69) $ 86 S 87 $ 90 Transfer From Stormwater Replacement Fund $ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (101) $ (243) $ (63) $ (69) $ 86 $ 87 $ 90 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 661 $ 418 $ 355 $ 349 $ 435 S 522 $ 611 261 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS WEDGEWOOD CREEK • FUND 5588 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 674 S 670 $ 639 S 640 $ 0 $ 0 S 0 Revenues: Taxes $ 2$ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0 S o Interest on Investments 29 15 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 31 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 34 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) (4) 15 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer To Sanitary Replacement Fund $ 0 $ (45) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfer To Coldwater Creek OMCI Fund 0 0 (639) (640) 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ 0 $ (45) $ (639) $ (640) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ (4) $ (30) $ (639) $ (640) S 0 S 0 $ 0 $ 670$ 640$ 0$ OS 0$ 0$ 0 262 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS WELLSTON • FUND 5589 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 3 S 93 $ 105 $ 106 S 118 $ 131 $ 144 Revenues: Taxes $ 5 $ 1 $ 36 $ 35 $ 35 $ 35 $ 36 Tax Revenue Anticipation Notes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 6 2 1 1 1 1 2 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 11 $ 3 $ 37 $ 36 S 36 $ 36 $ 38 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 9 $ 9 $ 9 $ 9 $ 9 SW Equipment 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Principal Payments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other (78) (10) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ (78) $ (10) $ 23 $ 23 S 23 $ 23 $ 24 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 89 $ 13 $ 14 $ 13 $ 13 $ 13 $ 14 Interfund Transfers $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 89 $ 13 $ 14 $ 13 $ 13 $ 13 $ 14 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 93 $ 106 $ 119 $ 118 $ 131 $ 144 $ 158 263 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWR DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS MISSOURI RIVER•BONFILS • FUND 5590 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 4,947 $ 3,277 $ 3.545 $ 3,546 $ 3,581 $ 1,117 $ 1,128 Revenues: Taxes $ 25 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Interest on Investments 258 107 28 35 36 11 11 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 284 $ 107 $ 28 $ 35 $ 36 $ 11 $ 11 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 1,954 0 0 0 2,500 0 0 Other 0 (162) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 1,954 $ (162) $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,500 $ 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (1,671) $ 269 $ 28 $ 35 $ (2,464) $ 11 $ 11 Transfer From Stormwater Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (1,671) $ 269 $ 28 $ 35 $ (2,464) $ 11 $ 11 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 3,277 $ 3,546 $ 3,573 $ 3,581 $ 1,117 $ 1,128 $ 1,139 264 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER: 5590 FUND NAME: MO RIVER BONFIL SUBD #448 OMCI Project Type Project Description Federal State Local Other MSD Cost Infrastructure MISSOURI RIVER BONFILS SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION 0 0 0 0 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 265 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS LOWER MERAMEC RIVER BASIN • FUND 5591 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 8,090 $ 6,948 $ 5,692 $ 5,692 $ 6,318 S 6,381 $ 6,445 Revenues: Taxes $ 35 $ 6$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0 Interest on Investments 441 196 57 57 63 64 64 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 476 $ 202 $ 57 $ 57 $ 63 $ 64 $ 64 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SW Overhead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 1,650 1,458 0 0 0 0 0 Other (32) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 1,618 $ 1,458 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 5 0 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (1,142) $ (1,256) $ 57 $ 57 $ 63 $ 64 $ 64 Transfer From Williams Creek (6620) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 569 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (1,142) $ (1,256) $ 57 $ 626 $ 63 $ 64 $ 64 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 6,948 $ 5,692 $ 5,749 $ 6,318 $ 6,381 $ 6,445 $ 6,509 266 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS SHREWSBURY BRANCH OF RIVER DES PERES • FUND 5592 ($ Goo) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 87 $ 51 $ 50 $ 50 S 50 $ 50 $ 50 Revenues: Taxes $ 0$ 0$ 19$ 18 $ 18$ 18$ 19 Interest on Investments 3 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 3 S (1) $ 19 $ 18 $ 18 $ 18 $ 19 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 $ 10 SW Equipment 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 SW Supplies 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 SW Overhead 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 Construction & Engineering 40 0 51 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 40 $ 0 $ 69 $ 18 $ 18 $ 18 $ 19 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (37) $ (1) $ (50) $ 0 $ 0 $ (0) $ 0 Transfer From Stormwater Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (37) $ (1) $ ($0) $ 0 $ 0 $ (0) $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 51 $ 50 $ 0 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 267 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS SEMINARY BRANCH OF RIVER DES PERES • FUND 5593 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 1,184 $ 853 $ 936 S 936 $ 882 $ 1,030 $ 1.176 Revenues: Taxes $ 4 $ 0 $ 256 $ 248 $ 214 $ 216 $ 220 Interest on Investments 49 23 13 13 13 10 12 Grant Income (1) 48 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 52 $ 71 $ 269 $ 261 $ 227 $ 226 $ 232 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 33 S 33 $ 33 $ 33 $ 34 SW Equipment 0 0 22 22 22 22 23 SW Supplies 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 SW Overhead 0 0 22 22 22 22 23 Construction & Engineering 385 0 452 409 0 0 0 Other (2) (12) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 383 $ (12) $ 531 $ 488 $ 79 $ 80 $ 81 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (331) $ 83 S (262) $ (227) $ 148 $ 146 $ 151 Transfer From Marlborough OMCI Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 173 $ 173 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (331) $ 83 $ (89) $ (54) $ 148 $ 146 $ 151 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 853 $ 936 $ 847 $ 882 $ 1,030 $ 1,176 $ 1,327 268 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS BLACK CREEK - FUND 5594 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 2,978 $ 2,464 $ 2,711 $ 2.711 $ 1,724 $ 278 $ 1 Revenues: Taxes $ 17 $ 3 $ 1,344 $ 1,304 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Interest on Investments 179 79 25 27 17 3 0 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 197 $ 82 $ 1,369 $ 1,331 $ 17 $ 3 $ 0 Expenditures: SW Labor $ 0 $ 0 $ 196 $ 196 $ 196 $ 119 $ 0 SW Equipment 0 0 126 126 126 76 0 SW Supplies 0 0 13 13 13 8 0 SW Overhead 0 0 128 128 128 77 0 Construction & Engineering 803 0 1,977 1,855 1,000 0 0 Other (93) (165) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 710 $ (165) $ 2,440 $ 2,318 $ 1,463 $ 280 $ 0 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (513) $ 247 $ (1,071) $ (987) $ (1,446) $ (277) $ 0 Transfer From Stormwater Replacement Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (513) $ 247 $ (1,071) $ (987) $ (1,446) $ (277) $ 0 FUND BALANCE E.O,P. $ 2,464 $ 2,711 $ 1,640 $ 1,724 $ 278 $ 1 $ 1 269 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER: 5594 FUND NAME: BLACK CREEK SUBD #455 OMCI Project Type Project Description Federal State Local Other MSD Cosi Slormwater WEAVER AVENUE #7761 - #7767 FLOOD MITIGATION 0 0 0 0 51,000,000 51.000,000 S1,000,000 51,000.000 270 These funds were established to provide for the receipt and disbursement of monies designated for payment of interest and redemption of outstanding bond issues. Changes in Fund Balance: Funds are reserved to comply with the terms and conditions of the Wastewater Revenue Bonds. 271 S44,000 S34,000 $24,000 $14,000 $4,000 REVENUE TRENDS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS CONSOLIDATED ($ 000) J J J ($6,000)J ti0 F•• e� Fy User Charge Revenue Taxes RI Interest Miscellaneous Fund Balance Used for Revenue Change in Fund Balance This analysis compares actual funds received in 2009 and 2010, a forecast for 2011, budget for 2012, and projections for the years 2013 and 2014. User charge revenue for the Debt Service Fund is transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund to pay principal and interest as it comes due. The issuance of District wide revenue bonds is used to fund wastewater capital improvement projects. The District plans to issue $84 million in FY 2011 and $40 million in FY 2012. 272 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE DEBT SERVICE FUNDS CONSOLIDATED (S 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 30,146 $ 33.969 $ 29,945 $ 29,945 $ 35,488 $ 35,705 $ 36,012 Revenues: Revenue Bond Proceeds Placed in Reserve $ 3,000 $ 2,938 $ 0 $ 5,200 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 1,616 894 292 613 266 357 360 Miscellaneous 0 451 0 1,668 1,668 1,668 1,668 Total Revenues S 4,616 $ 4,283 $ 292 $ 7,481 $ 1,934 $ 2,025 $ 2,028 Expenditures: Principal Payment $ � �12,110 $ 15,999 $ 17,023 $ 17,023 $ 19,404 $ 21,785 $ 19,334 Interest Payment 17,506 19,847 25,161 25,941 26,422 26,328 25,864 Other 0 963 50 50 50 50 50 Total Expenditures $ 29,616 $ 36,809 $ 42,234 $ 43,014 $ 45,877 $ 48,163 $ 45,248 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (25,000) $ (32,526) $ (41,942) $ (35,533) $ (43,942) $ (46,138) $ (43,220) Transfers From (To) $ 28,823 $ 28,502 $ 41,965 $ 41,077 $ 44,159 $ 46,445 $ 43,530 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 3,823 $ (4,024) $ 23 $ 5,544 $ 216 $ 307 $ 310 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 33,969 $ 29,945 $ 29,968 $ 35,488 $ 35.705 S 36,012 $ 36,322 - 273 REVENGE BONDS The Revenue Bonds portion of the Debt Service Funds section covers the Wastewater Construction Revenue Bonds, In February 2004, eligible St. Louis voters authorized the use of $500 million in Wastewater Revenue Bonds to fund the District's Wastewater Capital Improvement Program. In April and May of 2004, $336 million of these bonds were issued, $6.8 million were issued in 2005, $43.4 million in 2006, $73.8 million in 2007 and the remaining $40 million in FY 2009. The voters authorized the use of an additional $275 million in Wastewater Revenue Bonds to further fund the Wastewater Capital Improvement Program. In FY 2009 $30 million of these bonds were issued and $115 million issued in FY 2010. The issuance of $83.8 million in wastewater revenue bonds is anticipated for FY 2011 and $40 million in FY 2012 274 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE REVENUE BOND SERVICE FUNDS WASTEWATER REVENUE BOND SERVICE FUND - FUND 2804 (S 000� Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 29,683 $ 25,694 S 18,512 S 18,512 $ 23,727 $ 23,855 $ 24,043 Revenues: Revenue Bond Proceeds Placed in Reserve $ 0$ 0 S 0 $ 5.200 S 0 S 0$ 0 Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 1,108 548 190 284 178 239 240 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 1,108 $ 548 $ 190 $ 5,484 $ 178 S 239 $ 240 Expenditures: Principal Payment $ 12,110 $ 15,999 $ 17,023 $ 17,023 $ 19,404 $ 21,785 $ 19,334 Interest Payment 13,896 15,049 16,937 17,717 18,132 17,972 17,441 Other 0 963 50 50 50 50 50 Total Expenditures $ 26,006 $ 32,011 $ 34,010 $ 34,790 $ 37,587 S 39,807 $ 36,825 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (24,898) $ (31,463) $ (33,820) $ (29,306) $ (37,409) $ (39,568) $ (36,584) Transfer from Wastewater Revenue Fund (3306) $ 20,909 $ 24,281 $ 33,741 $ 34,521 $ 37,537 $ 39,757 $ 36,775 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ (3,989) $ (7,182) $ (79) $ 5,215 $ 128 $ 189 $ 190 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 25,694 $ 18,512 $ 18,433 $ 23,727 $ 23,855 $ 24,043 $ 24,234 275 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE REVENUE BOND SERVICE FUNDS WASTEWATER REVENUE BOND SERVICE FUND • FUND 2808 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 463 $ 5,210 $ 6,572 $ 6,572 $ 6,776 $ 6,827 $ 6,895 Revenues: Revenue Bond Proceeds Placed in Reserve $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 443 224 50 204 51 68 69 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 443 $ 224 $ 50 $ 204 $ 51 $ 68 $ 69 Expenditures: Principal Payment $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Interest Payment 2,902 1,451 2,902 2,902 2,902 2,902 2,902 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 2.902 $ 1,451 $ 2,902 $ 2,902 $ 2,902 $ 2,902 $ 2,902 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (2,459) $ (1,227) $ (2,852) $ (2,698) $ (2,851) $ (2,834) $ (2,833) Transfer from Wastewater Revenue fund (3306) $ 7,207 $ 2,589 $ 2,902 $ 2,902 $ 2,902 $ 2,902 $ 2,902 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 4,748 $ 1,362 $ 50 $ 204 $ 51 $ 68 $ 69 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 5.210 $ 6,572 $ 6,622 $ 6,776 $ 6,827 $ 6,895 $ 6,964 276 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE REVENUE BOND SERVICE FUNDS WASTEWATER REVENUE BOND SERVICE FUND - FUND 2810 (S 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 S 0 $ 3,064 $ 2,738 $ 2,738 $ 2,838 $ 2,859 $ 2,888 Revenues: Revenue Bond Proceeds Placed in Reserve $ 3,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 64 103 36 100 21 29 29 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 3,064 $ 103 $ 36 $ 100 $ 21 $ 29 $ 29 Expenditures: Principal Payment $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0 S 0 Interest Payment 707 2,061 344 344 410 477 544 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 707 $ 2,061 $ 344 $ 344 $ 410 $ 477 S 544 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 2,357 $ (1,958) $ (308) $ (244) $ (389) $ (448) S (515) Transfer from Wastewater Revenue Fund (3306) $ 707 $ 1,632 $ 344 $ 344 S 410 $ 477 $ 544 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 3,064 $ (326) $ 36 $ 100 S 21 $ 29 $ 29 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 3,064 $ 2,738 $ 2,774 $ 2,838 $ 2,859 $ 2,888 S 2,917 277 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE REVENUE BOND SERVICE FUNDS WASTEWATER REVENUE BOND (2010B) SERVICE FUND • FUND 2812 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,122 $ 2,122 $ 2,147 $ 2,163 S 2,185 Revenues: Revenue Bond Proceeds Placed in Reserve $ 0 $ 2,938 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 0 19 16 25 16 22 22 Miscellaneous 0 451 0 1,668 1,668 1,668 1,668 Total Revenues S 0 $ 3,408 $ 16 $ 1,693 $ 1,684 $ 1,690 $ 1,690 Expenditures: Principal Payment $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0 Interest Payment 0 1,286 4,978 4,978 4,978 4,978 4,978 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 0 $ 1,286 $ 4,978 $ 4,978 $ 4,978 $ 4,978 $ 4,978 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 0 $ 2,122 $ (4,962) $ (3,285) $ (3,293) $ (3,2M) $ (3,288) Transfer from Wastewater Revenue Fund (3306) $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,978 $ 3,310 $ 3,310 $ 3,310 $ 3,310 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 0 $ 2,122 $ 16 $ 25 $ 16 $ 22 $ 22 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 0 $ 2,122 $ 2,138 $ 2,147 $ 2,163 $ 2,185 $ 2,207 278 Metropolitan St, Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Debt Service Amortization Schedule Principal Fiscal Outstanding Year Ended (beginning of yr) Consolidated Debt Service Schedule Principal Additions Payment Interest Payment Gross Debt Fees ® Subsidy Net Debt 613012008 613012009 613012010 6130/2011 613012012 6/3012013 6130/2014 613012015 613012016 613012017 613012018 613012019 613012020 613012021 613012022 6/3012023 613012024 6130/2025 613012026 613012027 613012028 613012029 6130/2030 613012031 613012032 6130/2033 613012034 6130/2035 6130/2036 6130/2037 613012038 6130/2039 6/3012040 $445,647,500 $437,007,500 $499,027,500 $604,677,285 5717,863,481 $698,459,264 $676,674,003 $657,339,638 $637,511,830 $616,664,979 $595,199,441 $572,956,898 $549,885,206 $525,968,565 $501,089,614 $475,288,071 $448,623,354 $420,967,784 $393,988,798 $367,876,014 $343,958,952 $319,315,049 $294,563,825 $267,735,217 $241,371,200 $219,190,000 $196,170,000 $161,990,000 $126,760,000 $90,335,000 $43,805,000 $19,000,000 ($1,000,0001 $8,640,000 74,130,000 $12,110,000 121,641,291 $15,991,506 130,209,409 $17,023,213 $19,404,218 $21,785,261 $19,334,365 $19,827,808 $20,846,851 $21,465,538 $22242,543 $23,071,692 $23,916,641 $24,878,951 $25,801,543 $26,664,716 $27,655,570 $26,978,986 $26,112,784 $23,917,062 $24,643,903 $24,751,224 $26,828,608 $26,364,016 $22,181,200 $23,020,000 $34,180,000 $35,230,000 $36,425,000 $46,530,000 $24,805,000 $20,000,000 $0 $22,844,589 $24,079,799 $25,140,564 $30,235,605 $31,477,004 $30,713,327 $29,975,652 $29,255,215 $28,469,722 $27,648,030 $26,773,207 $25,851,793 $24,869,885 $23,867,329 $22,827,289 $21,749,351 $20,621,841 $19,443,591 $18,230,844 $17,000,542 $15,988,312 $14,970,851 $14,072,358 $12,971,508 $11,895,610 $10,817,428 $9,659,153 $8,142,490 $6,468,580 $4,710,363 $2,618,688 $1,171,200 $0 $31,484,589 $36,189,799 $41,132,070 $47,258,818 1,044,132 235,060 1,192,153 1,144,416 $50,881,222 $52,498,588 $49,310,017 $49,083,023 $49,316,574 $49,113,568 $49,015,751 $48,923,485 $48,786,525 $48,746,280 $48,628,832 $48,414,067 $48,277,411 $46,422,577 $44,343,628 $40,917,604 $40,632,215 $39,722,075 $40,900,967 $39,335,524 $34,076,810 $33,837,428 $43,839,153 $43,372,490 $42,893,580 $51,240,363 $27,423,688 $21,171,200 $0 1,477,235 1,787,734 1,703,908 1,618,293 1,529,630 1,439,824 1,345,849 1,249,911 1,151,276 1,0219,932 945,926 838,219 728,686 616,249 500,899 400,788 334,035 283,241 85,876 37,283 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (6,193,930) 26,334,791 (6,810,968) 29,613,891 (6,687,996) 35,636,227 (6.882,863) 41,520,371 (6,531,904) 45,826,553 (6,173,074) 48,113,248 (5,815,784) 45,198,141 (5,453,201) 45,248,116 (5,081,635) 45,764,569 (4,695,387) 45,858,005 (4.292,001) 46,069,599 (3,876,242) 46,297,153 (3,450,627) 46,487,174 (3,016,260) 46,779,952 (2,583,869) 46,990,889 (2,135,947) 47,116,339 (1,684,467) 47,321,631 (1 222 796) 45,816,030 (749,450) 44,095,077 (360,566) 40,957,826 (192,535) 40,773,714 (90,900) 39,914,416 0 40,986,842 0 39,372,806 0 34,076,810 0 33,837,428 0 43,839,153 0 43,372,490 0 42,893,580 0 51,240,363 0 27,423,688 0 21,171,200 C 0 Totals 325,980,700 772,628,200 614,561,716 1,387,189,916 22,740,555 (83,982,400) 1,325,948,071 NMCCTBUDGETiFY20121GFOA FY12QDehr Service Schedule FY12.XIsfrofal ® Includes DNR Fees and TrusteelDisseminiation Fee ® Debt Service Reserve Fund Eamings 279 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 280 Special Funds of the District are comprised of the following: IMPROVEMENT FUND: A fund created by the Charter to pay the cost of any improvements or to purchase any special tax bills issued for any improvement. The fund can receive monies from the General Fund, bond issues, collection of special benefit assessments or special tax bills, sale of special tax bills, or any other source provided by law. WATER BACKUP INSURANCE & REIMBURSEMENT FUND: A fund to be used to respond to water backups caused by overcharged lines or blocked mains. This fund will administer the Water Backup Insurance and Reimbursement Program. EMERGENCY FUNDS: Funds to be used for emergency sewer repairs and replacements in the operation and maintenance of the District that are of such a nature as to be non-measureable in the budgeting and appropriations of annual revenues. 281 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 ($2,000) REVENUE TRENDS SPECIAL FUNDS CONSOLIDATED ($ 000) oN �a 19 Fy User Charge Revenue Grant Income Interest, Fees, Misc, Fund Balance Used for Revenue Change in fund Balance This analysis compares actual funds received in 2009 and 2010, a forecast for 2011, budget for 2012, and projections for the years 2013 and 2014. User charge revenue for the Special Funds is transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund to cover the cost of the Water Backup Program. Budgeted and projected interest income is based on a 0,75% interest rate on beginning fund balances unless cash balances are expected to be materially different from fund balances. Connection Fees are recorded in the Improvement Fund and estimated based on historical trends. Excess funds are retained in fund balances until emergency or other funds are needed. 282 METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE SPECIAL FUNDS CONSOLIDATED ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 9,239 $ 9,598 $ 16,720 $ 16,720 $ 16,218 $ 13,829 $ 13,090 Revenues: Interest on Investments $ 650 $ 165 $ 151 S 606 $ 126 $ 126 S 120 Grant Income 38 0 0 0 94 0 0 Connection & Other Fees 998 672 750 736 650 650 650 Proceeds from Sale of Property 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rental Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 Total Revenues S 1,689 $ 842 $ 906 $ 1,347 $ 875 $ 781 $ 775 Expenditures: Supplies $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0 Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contractual Services • i 6,817 3,951 4,000 3,528 3,500 3,500 3,500 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 4,067 (902) 1,390 1,590 2,264 3,020 3,636 Principal Payments 43 168 30 0 0 0 0 Interest Payments 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 10,930 $ 3,221 $ 5,423 $ 5,118 $ 5,764 $ 6,520 $ 7,136 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (9,241) $ (2,379) $ (4,517) $ (3,771) $ (4,889) $ (5,739) $ (6,361) Transfers From (To) $ 9,600 $ 9,500 $ 3,269 $ 3,269 $ 2,500 $ 5,000 $ 5,500 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 359 $ 7,121 $ (1,248) $ (502) $ (2,389) $ (739) $ (861) FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 9,598 $ 16,720 $ 15,472 $ 16,218 $ 13,829 $ 13,090 $ 12,229 283 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE SPECIAL FUNDS IMPROVEMENT - FUND 4102 IS COOT Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. S 348 S 380 $ 352 $ 352 $ 1,282 $ 1,280 $ 932 Revenues: Interest on Investments $ 105 $ (87) $ 11 S 10 S 13 $ 17 S 14 Grant Income 38 0 0 0 94 0 0 Connection & Other Fees 998 672 750 736 650 650 650 Miscellaneous 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 Total Revenues $ 1,145 $ 590 $ 766 S 751 S 762 $ 672 $ 669 Expenditures: Construction & Engineering $ 1,067 S 446 S 890 $ 1,090 $ 1,764 $ 2,520 $ 3136 Principal Payments 43 168 30 0 0 0 0 Interest Payments 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 1,113 $ 618 $ 923 $ 1,090 $ 1,764 $ 2,520 $ 3,136 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 31 $ (28) S (157) $ (339) $ (1,002) $ (1,848) $ (2,467) Transfers From (To)! From 3306 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,269 $ 1,269 $ 1,000 $ 1,500 $ 2,000 Transfers From (To)! From 3307 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,269 $ 1,269 $ 1,000 $ 1,500 $ 2,000 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 31 $ (28) S 1,112 S 930 $ (2) $ (348) $ (467) FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 380 $ 352 S 1,464 S 1,282 S 1,280 $ 932 $ 465 284 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER: 4102 Project Type Proiect Descriptron Stormwater Dislrictwide 0&M GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (FY2012) GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- GEOTECHNICAL (FY2012) CONTRACT A GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- GEOTECHNICAL (FY2012) CONTRACT B GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - GEOTECHNICAL (FY2012) CONTRACT C GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - SEWER & CHANNEL DESIGN (FY2011) CONTRACT A GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - SEWER & CHANNEL DESIGN (FY2011) CONTRACT B GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - SEWER & CHANNEL DESIGN (FY2011) CONTRACT C STREAM FLOW GAUGE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (USGS) STREAM FLOW WATER QUALITY SAMPLING (FY 2011) BOND PLACE SANITARY SEWERS (SD #2010094) FUND NAME: IMPROVEMENT FUND Federal Stale Local Other MSD Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $94,000 $94,000 0 0 $100.000 $100,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 0 50.000 50,000 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 0 90.000 90,000 0 0 90.000 90.000 0 0 90,000 90,000 0 0 550,000 550,000 0 0 600,000 600,000 0 0 94,000 $1,670,000 $1,764,000 285 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE SPECIAL FUNDS WATER BACKUP INSURANCE & REIMBURSEMENT FUND - FUND 4104 ($ 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. $ 3,724 $ 6,841 $ 10,295 $ 10,295 $ 9,151 $ 6,720 $ 6.270 Revenues: Interest on Investments $ 334 $ 205 $ 95 $ 384 $ 69 $ 50 $ 47 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 334 $ 205 $ 95 $ 384 $ 69 $ 50 $ 47 Expenditures: Contractual -WBU $ 6,817 $ 3,951 $ 4,000 $ 3,528 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 Construction & Engineering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expenditures $ 6,817 $ 3,951 $ 4,000 $ 3,528 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (6,483) $ (3,746) $ (3,905) $ (3,144) $ (3,431) $ (3,450) $ (3,453) Interfund Transfers From (To): Transfer In! (Out) $ 4,600 $ 0 $ (1,000) $ (1,000) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Wastewater Revenue (3306) 5,000 7,200 3,000 3,000 1,000 3,000 3,000 Total Interfund Transfers $ 9,600 $ 7,200 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 3,117 $ 3,454 $ (1,905) $ (1,144) $ (2,431) $ (450) $ (453) FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 6,841 $ 10,295 $ 8,390 $ 9,151 $ 6,720 $ 6,270 $ 5,817 286 METROPOLITAN ST, LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE SPECIAL FUNDS WASTEWATER EMERGENCY • FUND 4122 (S 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. S 5,167 S 2.378 $ 6.073 $ 6,073 $ 5,535 $ 5,577 $ 5,633 Revenues: Interest on Investments $ 211 S 47 $ 45 $ 212 S 42 S 56 S 56 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connection & Other Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 211 $ 47 $ 45 $ 212 $ 42 S 56 S 56 Expenditures: Supplies $ 0$ 0 S 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 S 0 Contractual Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 3,000 (1.348) 250 250 250 250 250 Total Expenditures $ 3,000 $ (1,348) $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 S 250 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (2,789) $ 1,395 $ (205) $ (38) $ (208) $ (194) S (194) Interfund Transfers From (To): General Fund (1101) $ 0 $ 0 $ (1,000) $ (1,000) $ 0 S 0 $ 0 Wastewater Revenue Fund (3306) 0 2,300 500 500 250 250 250 Stonnwater Revenue Fund (3307) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ 0 S 2,300 $ (500) $ (500) $ 250 S 250 $ 250 Increase (Decrease) in fund Bal. $ (2,789) $ 3,695 $ (705) $ (538) $ 42 S 56 $ 56 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 2,378 $ 6,073 $ 5,368 $ 5,535 $ 5,577 $ 5,633 $ 5,689 287 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER: 4122 FUND NAME: WASTEWATER EMERGENCY Proiect Type Proiect Description Federal State Local Other MSD Cost Infrastructure EMERGENCY REPAIR FUND APPROPRIATION (FY2012) 0 0 0 0 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 288 FUND BALANCE B.O.P. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE SPECIAL FUNDS STORMWATER EMERGENCY- FUND 4123 (S 000) Actual Actual Budget Forecast BUDGET Projected Projected FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 250 $ 252 $ 255 Revenues: Interest on Investments $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 Grant Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Connection & Other Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 Expenditures: Supplies $ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 Contractual Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction & Engineering 0 0 250 250 250 250 250 Total Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ 0 $ 0 $ (250) $ (250) $ (248) $ (247) $ (247) Interfund Transfers From (To): Stormwater Revenue Fund (3307) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 Storrnwater Replacement Fund (6700) 0 0 500 500 0 0 0 Total Interfund Transfers $ 0 $ 0 $ 500 $ 500 $ 250 $ 250 $ 250 Increase (Decrease) in Fund Bal. $ 0 $ 0 $ 250 $ 250 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 FUND BALANCE E.O.P. $ 0 $ 0 $ 250 $ 250 $ 252 $ 255 $ 258 289 Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT & REPLACEMENT PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2012 FUND NUMBER: 4123 FUND NAME: STORNIWATER EMERGENCY FUND Proiect Type Protect Description Federal State Local Other MSD Cost Infrastructure EMERGENCY REPAIR FUNDS (STORMWATER) 0 0 0 0 $250,000 $250.000 $250,000 $250,000 290 BUDGET ORDINANCE 291 Revenue: Wastewater Revenue Fund Stormwater Revenue Fund Appropriations: Operating Budget General Fund Board of Trustees Rate Commission Civil Service Commission Secretary -Treasurer Executive Director General Counsel Human Resources Finance Informabon Systems Engineering Operations $ 224,321,000 1,359,000 Total Revenue Funds $ 225,680,000 Total General Fund Improvement Fund Water Backup Insurance & Reimbursement Fund Total Operating Budget Emergency Funds Operations, Maintenance and Capital Improvement Funds Debt Service Funds s 6,100 230,575 8,750 2,085,593 911,510 4,294,387 11,766,405 16,689,718 10,846,593 22,395,275 87,377,757 156,612,663 $ 1,764,000 3,500,000 $ 161,876,663 $ 500,000 18,265,343 45,877,000 Total Appropriations $ 226,519,006 Less: Inter -fund Services for Stormwater Operations $ (18,265,343) * Net Appropriations $ 208,253,663 BUDGET ORDINANCE Fiscal Year 2012 Fund Transfers: Transfers from Wastewater Revenue Fund: General Fund Sanitary Replacement Fund Wastewater Emergency Fund Water Backup Insurance & Reimbursement Fund Improvement Fund Debt Service Funds Total Wastewater Revenue Transfers Transfers from Stormwater Revenue Fund: Stormwater Emergency Fund Disbiclwide Stormwater Fund Total Stormwater Revenue Transfers Transfers from General Fund: Districtwide Stormwater Fund Stormwater Operations, Maintenance and Capital Improvement Fund Total General Fund Transfers Total Fund Transfers $ 138,912,000 39,000,000 250,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 44,159,000 $ 224,321,000 $ 250,000 1,109,000 $ 1,359,000 $ 7,461,000 8,910,000 $ 16,371,000 $ 242,051,000 292 ' Reported as required per General Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement 4 34 FY2012 BUDGET ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE, repealing and superseding Ordinance No. 13213 adopted February 10, 2011, and making appropriations in for the current expenses of the District in the General Fund, the Water Backup Insurance & Reimbursement Fund, the Improvement Fund, the Sanitary Replacement Fund, the Stormwater Operations, Maintenance and Construction Improvement Funds, the Emergency Funds, the Debt Service Funds, and the Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Funds for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012, amounting in the aggregate Two Hundred Eight Million Two Hundred Fifty Three Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Three Dollars ($208,253,663) to pay interest falling due on bonds issued, the costs of support, operation, and maintenance of the District and its various Subdistricts, and emergencies. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT: REVENUE FUNDS Section One — Wastewater Revenue Fund. The total dollars collected in the Wastewater Revenue Fund is estimated to be Two Hundred Twenty Four Million Three Hundred Twenty One Thousand Dollars ($224,321,000) and is hereby transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund to the General Fund of the District for the support, operation and maintenance of several departments, Board, Civil Service Commission, the Water Backup Insurance & Reimbursement fund, the Improvement Funds, Wastewater and Stormwater Emergency Funds, the Sanitary Replacement Fund, Operations, Maintenance and Capital Improvement Funds and the Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Funds for other lawhil activities of the District inducting the payment of interest and principal falling due on bonds issued for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012. Section Two — Stormwater Revenue Fund. The total dollars collected in the Stormwater Revenue Fund is estimated to be One Million Three Hundred Fifty Nine Thousand Dollars ($1,359,000) and is hereby transferred from the Stormwater Revenue Fund to the District Stormwater Fund, the Stormwater Emergency Fund and the Stormwater Replacement Fund for the support, operation and maintenance of TOTAL USER CHARGE REVENUE $225,680,000 DISTRICT OPERATING FUNDS Section Three — General Fund. There is hereby transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund the sum of One Hundred Thirty Eight Million Nine Hundred Twelve Thousand Dollars ($138,912,000); There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the General Fund of the District the sum of One Hundred Fifty Sic Million Sic Hundred Twelve Thousand Sk Hundred Sixty Three Dollars ($156,612,663) for the support, operation and maintenance of several departments, Board, Civil Service Commission, and other lawful activities of the District. Eighteen Million Two Hundred Sixty FNe Thousand Three Hundred Forty Three Dollars ($18,265,343) of the General Fund appropriation is offset by inter -fund revenues related to the appropriated stormwater program as referenced in Section Seven of this Ordinance. The General Fund appropriation of One Hundred Fifty Sic Million Six Hundred Twelve Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Three Dollars ($156,612,663) for the fiscal beginning July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2012 is hereinafter detailed: Departments: 1. Board of Trustees $ 6,100 2. Rate Commission 230,575 3. Civil Service Commission 8,750 4. Secretary -Treasurer 2,085,593 5. Executive Director 911,510 6. General Counsel 4,294,387 7. Human Resources 11,766,405 8. Finance 16,689,718 9. Information Systems 10,846,593 10. Engineering 22,395,275 11.Operations 87,377,757 DISTRICT GENERAL FUND BUDGET TOTAL $156.612.663 293 Section Four — Wastewater Backup Insurance and Reimbursement Fund For the purpose of providing water backup insurance and reimbursement for basement backups, there is hereby transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund the sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,009) to the Water Backup Insurance and Reimbursement Fund. There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Water Backup Insurance and Reimbursement Fund the sum of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000). Section Five — Improvement Fund For the purpose of meeting the costs of repairing, rehabilitating and replacing the District's Wastewater System, there is hereby transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund the sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) to the Improvement Fund. There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Improvement Fund the sum of One Million Seven Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Dollars ($1,764,000). TOTAL DISTRICT OPERATING BUDGET $161,876.663 WASTEWATER CAPITAL PROGRAM USER CHARGE FUNDING Section Sic — Sanitary Replacement Fund. For the purpose of meeting the costs of repairing, rehabilitating and replacing the District's Wastewater System, there is hereby transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund to the Sanitary Replacement Fund the sum of Thirty Nine Million Dollars ($39,000,000) STORMWATER OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT FUNDS Section Seven — Stormwater Operations, Maintenance and Capital Improvement Fund. For the purpose of providing Stormwater Operations, Maintenance, Administration, and Construction Improvements, there is hereby appropriated Eighteen Million Two Hundred Sixty Five Thousand Three Hundred Forty Three Dollars ($18,265,343) executed through the following Stormwater Operations, Maintenance, Administration and Construction Improvement Funds: Section Seven (1) — District Wide Stormwater Fund. For the purpose of providing for operations, maintenance, administration, and construction Improvement, there is hereby transferred from the General Fund to the District Wide Stormwater Fund the sum of Seven Million Four Hundred Sixty One Thousand Dollars ($7,461,000) and from the Stormwater Revenue Fund the sum of One Million One Hundred Nine Thousand Dollars ($1,109,000). There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the District Wide Stormwater Fund the sum of Eight Million Two Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty nine Dollars ($8,248,889) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of Resolution No. 2954 adopted January 13, 2011. Section Seven (2) — Stormwater and Maintenance, Operations and Construction Improvement Fund. For the purpose of allowing the District to better segregate the wastewater and stomrwater activities of the District for financial reporting purposes, there is hereby transferred from the General Fund the sum of Eight Million Nine Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($8,910,000) There is hereby appropriated and set aparl out of the Stormwater and Maintenance, Operations and Construction Improvement Fund the sum of Six Million One Hundred Twenty Thousand Eight Hundred and Ten Dollars ($6,120,810) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of Resolution No. 2954 adopted January 13, 2011. Section Seven (3) — Black Creek OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Black Creek OMCI Fund the sum of Four Hundred Sixty Three Thousand Four Hundred Eighty One Dollars ($463,481) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (4) —Clayton Central OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Clayton Central OMCI Fund the sum of Forty Five Thousand Six Hundred Twenty Dollars ($45,620) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (5) — Coldwater OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Coldwater OMCI Fund the sum of Six Hundred Ninety Sbc Thousand Nine Hundred and Six Dollars ($696,906) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (6) — Creve Coeur OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction 294 Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Creve Coeur OMCI Fund the sum of One Hundred Thirty Two Thousand Five Hundred Sixty Four Dollars ($132,564) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (7) — Deer Creek OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Deer Creek OMCI Fund the sum of Four Hundred Ninety Three Thousand Eighty Dollars ($493,080) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (8)— Fountain Creek OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Fountain Creek OMCI Fund the sum of Eighty Seven Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty One Dollars ($87,931) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (9) — Gravois Creek OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Gravois Creek OMCI Fund the sum of Four Hundred Forty-five Thousand One Hundred Eighty Seven Dollars ($445,187) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (10) — Loretta -Joplin OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Loretta -Joplin OMCI Fund the sum of Three Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars ($3,940) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (11) — Maline Creek OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Maline Creek OMCI Fund the sum of Five Hundred Nineteen Thousand Sic Hundred Fifty Nine Dollars ($519,659) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (12) — North Affton OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the North Affton OMCI Fund the sum of Twelve Thousand Two Hundred Eighty Dollars ($12,280) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (13) — Seminary Branch of River Des Peres OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Seminary Branch of River Des Peres OMCI Fund the sum of Seventy Eight Thousand Five Hundred and Nineteen Dollars ($78,519) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (14) — Shrewsbury Branch of River Des Peres OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Shrewsbury Branch of River Des Peres OMCI Fund the sum of Eighteen Thousand Three Hundred Ninety Nine Dollars ($18,399) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (15) — Sugar Creek OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Sugar Creek OMCI Fund the sum of Fifty Two Thousand Three Hundred Forty Five Dollars ($52,345) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (16) — University City Branch of River Des Peres OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the University City Branch of River Des Peres OMCI Fund the sum of Seven Hundred Forty One Thousand Nine Hundred Nine Dollars ($741,909) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. Section Seven (17) — Watkins Creek OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Watkins Creek OMCI Fund the sum of Eighty Thousand Four 295 Hundred Ninety One Dollars ($80,491) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011 Section Seven (18) — Wellston OMCI Fund. For the purpose of providing for Operations, Maintenance, Administration, Construction Improvement, there is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Wellston OMCI Fund the sum of Twenty Three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Two Dollars ($23,332) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for work or repairs in accordance wtih the requirements of this Proposed Ordinance introduced May 12, 2011. TOTAL STORMWATER BUDGET $18,265,343 EMERGENCY WORK OR REPAIR FUNDS Section Eight —Wastewater Emergency Fund. For the purpose of providing for emergency work or repairs requiring prompt attention, there is hereby transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund to the Wastewater Emergency Fund the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000). There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Wastewater Emergency Fund the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for emergency work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of Section Three of Ordinance No.164, as adopted November 4,1957, as amended May 26,1958 by Ordinance No.199 and as amended June 3,1961 by Ordinance No, 569 and as amended by Ordinance No. 99-11 adopted January 13, 2011. Section Nine — Stormwater Emergency Fund. For the purpose of providing for emergency work or repairs requiring prompt attention, there is hereby transferred from the Stormwater Revenue Fund to the Stormwater Emergency Fund the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000). There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Stormwater Emergency Fund the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) for use by the Executive Director in contracting for emergency work or repairs in accordance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 99-11 as adopted January 13, 2011. TOTAL EMERGENCY FUND BUDGET $ 500,000 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Section Ten - Debt Service Funds. For the purpose of providing for the support of the Wastewater Revenue Bond Debt Service of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 and ending June 30, 2011, there is hereby transferred from the Wastewater Revenue Fund to the Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Funds the total sum of Forty Four Million One Hundred Ftfty Nine Thousand Dollars ($44,159,000). There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Fund Number 2804 the sum of Thirty Seven Million Five Hundred Thirty Seven Thousand Dollars ($37,537,000) for total District principal and interest falling due on Seven Hundred Twenty Five Million Dollars ($725,000,000) par value outstanding revenue bonds and banking fees relating to the debt and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) associated with expenses related to the bonds. There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Fund Number 2808 the sum of Two Million Nine Hundred Two Thousand Dollars ($2,902,000) for total District principal and interest falling due on Seven Hundred Twenty Five Million Dollars ($725,000,000) par value outstanding revenue bonds and banking fees relating to the debt There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Fund Number 2810 the sum of Four Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($410,000) for principal and interest falling due on Seven Hundred Twenty Five Million Dollars ($725,000,000) par value outstanding revenue bonds and banking fees relating to the debt. There is hereby appropriated and set apart out of the Wastewater Revenue Bond Service Fund Number 2812 the sum of Four Million Nine Hundred Seventy-eight Thousand Dollars ($4,978,000) for principal and interest falling due on Seven Hundred Twenty Five Million Dollars ($725,000,000) par value outstanding revenue bonds and banking fees relating to the debt. TOTAL DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE BUDGET TOTAL DISTRICT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS Less: Inter -fund Services for Stormwater Operations (Reported as required by General Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement#34 NET DISTRICT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS $ 45,877,000 $226,519,006 ($18,265,343) S208,253.653 296 SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 District Operating Budget District General Fund $156.612,663 District Water Backup Insurance and Reimbursement Fund 3,500,000 District Improvement Fund 1,764,000 TOTAL DISTRICT OPERATING BUDGET $161,876,663 TOTAL STORMWATER OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET $ 18,265,343 TOTAL EMERGENCY WORK OR REPAIR BUDGET $ 500,000 TOTAL DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE BUDGET $ 45,877.000 TOTAL DISTRICT APPROPRIATIONS $ 226,519,006 Less: Inter -fund Services for Stormwater Operations ($18,265,343) * NET DISTRICT APPROPRIATIONS $ 2084253,663 Reported as required per General Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement # 34 297 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 298 TAX ORDINANCE 299 TAX ORDINANCE FISCAL YEAR 2012 RECOMMENDED TAX LEVIES IN 2011 DISTRICT•WIDE Rate Per $100 of Assessed Value Required 2011 Personal Tax Revenue* Tax Levy Residential Agricultural Commercial Property Administrative Tax: City $807,662 $832,641 $0.018 $0,018 $0.018 $0.018 County 3,948,356 4,070,470 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 Total Admin. Tax $4,756,018 $4,903,111 Stormwater Tax: City $2,737,079 $2,821,731 $0.061 $0.061 $0.061 $0.061 County 6,877,317 7,090,018 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.061 Total Stormwater Tax $9,614,397 $9,911,749 Other Taxing Subdistricts: County- All 18 Active Subdistricts** $8,631,975 $8,899,975 TOTAL DISTRICT -WIDE TAX $23,002,389 $23,714,835 *Budgeted Tax Revenue equals Tax Levy less anticipated delinquency. **Details on following page. 300 OTHER TAXING SUBDISTRICTS DISTRICT•WIDE Rate Per $100 of Assessed Value Required 2011 Personal Tax Revenue* Tax Levy Residential Agricultural Commercial Property Other Taxing Subdistricts: Coldwater Creek 51,972,181 $2,033,176 $0.097 $0.031 $0.100 $0.018 Gravois Creek 1,267,857 1,307,069 0.075 0.100 0.078 0.086 Maline Creek 629,320 648,783 0.093 0.099 0.088 0.100 Watkins Creek 160,670 165,639 0.097 0.099 0.099 0.099 Fountain Creek 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Loretta -Joplin 20,152 21,394 0.071 0.000 0.077 0.090 Clayton -Central 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 University City Branch River des Peres 788,472 812,858 0.080 0.000 0.091 0.094 Deer Creek 3,249,838 3,350,348 0.081 0.076 0.082 0.093 Sugar Creek 219,356 226,449 0.058 0.000 0.051 0.069 Missouri River-Bonfils 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Meramec River Basin 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Shrewsbury -River des Peres 18,462 19,136 0.060 0.000 0.063 0.082 Seminary Branch of River des Peres 214,125 220,748 0.066 0.000 0.074 0.076 Black Creek 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Creve Coeur 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 North Affton 56,440 58,186 0.072 0.000 0.076 0.085 Wellston 35,103 36,189 0,100 0.000 0.100 0,100 TOTAL OTHER TAXING SUBDISTRICTS $8,631,975 $8,899,975 *Budgeted Tax Revenue equals Tax Levy less anticipated delinquency. 301 FY2012TAXORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE determining the amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed, and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property in the District within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis and St. Louis County, respectively, and in Subdistricts within the corporate limits of St. Louis County as follows: Coldwater Creek Trunk Subdistrict, Gravois Creek Trunk Subdistrict, Maline Creek Trunk Subdistrict, Watkins Creek Trunk Subdistrict, Subdistrict No. 88 (Fountain Creek), Subdistrict No. 89 (Loretta -Joplin), Subdistrict No. 342 (Clayton -Central), Subdistrict No. 366 (University City Branch of River des Peres Stormwater Subdistrict), Subdistrict No. 367 (Deer Creek Stormwater Subdistrict), Subdistrict No. 369 (Sugar Creek), Subdistrict No. 448 (Missouri River - Bogus), Subdistrict No. 449 (Meramec River Basin - M.S.D. Southwest), Subdistrict No. 453 (Shrewsbury Branch of River des Peres), Subdistrict No. 454 (Seminary Branch of River des Peres), Subdistrict No. 455 (Black Creek), Subdistrict No.1 of the River des Peres Watershed (Creve Coeur-Frontenac Area), Subdistrict No. 4 of the River des Peres Watershed (North Affion Area) and Subdistrict No. 7 of the River des Peres Watershed (Wellston Area), WHEREAS, after notice of hearing as provided in the Charter, and after due consideration of all the statements made and the facts adduced at such hearing, the Board has found that it will be necessary in the calendar year 2011 to levy, assess, and collect taxes on taxable tangible property in the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT: Section One. For the fiscal year beginning July 1.2011, The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District shall levy, assess, and collect taxes on all taxable tangible property within the boundaries of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. Section Two. For the general administration of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District during the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2011, the amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed, and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within the boundaries of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District shall be Four Million Nine Hundred Three Thousand One Hundred Eleven Dollars ($4,903,111.00), which will be produced by the rate of one point eight cents (.018) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, one point eight cents (.018) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for agricultural property, one point eight cents (.018) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and one point eight cents (.018) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property, and of which Eight Hundred Thirty-two Thousand Six Hundred Forty-one Dollars ($832,641.00), shall be levied, assessed, and collected on taxable tangible property in said District within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis, and of which Four Million Seventy Thousand Four Hundred Seventy Dollars ($4,070,470.00), shall be levied, assessed, and collected on taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within said District. These fiords are to be 302 allocated to the Districtwide Stormwater Fund. Section Three. In The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, for the purposes of operation and maintenance of said existing public stormwater facilities, and for the anticipated tax delinquencies during the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2011, the amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed, and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property in said District shall be Nine Million Nine Hundred Eleven Thousand Seven Hundred Forty-nine Dollars ($9,911,749.00), which total sum will be produced by the rate of six point one cents (.061) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, six point one cents (.061) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for agricultural property, six point one cents (.061) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and six point one cents (.061) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property, and of which total sum Two Million Eight Hundred Twenty-one Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty-one Dollars ($2,821,731.00), shall be levied, assessed, and collected on taxable tangible property in said District within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis, and of which total sum Seven Million Ninety Thousand Eighteen Dollars ($7,090,018.00), shall be levied, assessed, and collected on taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within the original boundaries of the District, as described in the Charter of the District, and within the areas described in the annexation ordinances listed in District Ordinance No. 3753, adopted April 11,1979. These fimds are to be allocated to the Stormwater Operations & Maintenance Fund. Section Four. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within the Coldwater Creek Trunk Subdistrict, as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 3755, adopted April 11,1979, shall be Two Million Thirty-three Thousand One Hundred Seventy-six Dollars ($2,033,176.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of nine point seven cents (.097) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, three point one cents (.031) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for agricultural property, ten cents (.100) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and ten cents (.100) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Five. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within the Gravois Creek Trunk Subdistrict, as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 425, adopted July 14,1960; and as enlarged by annexation thereto of the areas described in District Ordinance No.1235, adopted November 12,1964; No.1451, adopted January 13,1966; No.1453, adopted January 13,1966; No.1485, adopted May 9,1966; No.1784, adopted September 12,1968; No.1884, adopted May 1,1969; No.1907, adopted June 12,1969; No. 2011, adopted March 19,1970; No. 2157, adopted April 22,1971; No. 2175, adopted June 3,1971; No.177, adopted June 3,1971; No. 2191, adopted July 15,1971; No. 2272, adopted March 9,1972; No. 2377, adopted January 26,1973; and No. 2941, adopted October 29, 1975; shall be One Million Three Hundred Seven Thousand Sixty-nine Dollars ($1,307,069.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of seven point five cents (.075) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, ten cents (.100) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for agricultural property, seven point eight cents (.078) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for 303 commercial property and eight point six cents (.086) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Six. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within the Wine Creek Trunk Subdistrict, as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 26, adopted June 30,1955, and as enlarged by annexation thereto of the area described in District Ordinance No. 1962, adopted October 30, 1969, shall be Six Hundred Forty-eight Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty-three Dollars ($648,783.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of nine point three cents (.093) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, nine point nine cents (.099) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for agricultural property, eight point eight cents (.088) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and ten cents (.100) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Seven. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within the Watkins Creek Trunk Subdistrict, as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 1304, adopted April 8, 1965, and as enlarged by annexation thereto of the area described in Ordinance No. 2050, adopted June 18, 1970, and Ordinance No. 2236, adopted October 29,1971, shall be One Hundred Sixty-five Thousand Six Hundred Thirty-nine Dollars ($165,639.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of nine point seven cents (.097) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, nine point nine cents (.099) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for agricultural property, nine point nine cents (.099) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and nine point nine cents (.099) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Eight. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 88 (Fountain Creek), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 377, adopted March 18,1960, shall be Zero Dollars ($0.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Nine. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 89 (Loretta -Joplin), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 383, adopted March 31,1960, shall be Twenty-one Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-four Dollars ($21,394.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of seven point one cents (.071) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, seven point seven cents (.077) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and nine cents (.090) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. 304 Section Ten. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 342 (Clayton -Central), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No.1882, adopted May 1,1969, shall be Zero Dollars ($0.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Eleven. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 366 (University City Branch of River des Peres Stormwater Subdistrict), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 2146, adopted April 14,1971, shall be Eight Hundred Twelve Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-eight Dollars ($812,858.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of eight cents (.080) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, nine point one cents (.091) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and nine point four cents (.094) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Twelve. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 367 (Deer Creek Stormwater Subdistrict), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 2557, adopted March 27,1974; and as enlarged by annexation thereto of the areas described in District Ordinance No. 2611, adopted June 26,1974, shall be Three Million Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Three Hundred Forty-eight Dollars ($3,350,348.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of eight point one cents (.081) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, seven point six cents (.076) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for agricultural property, eight point two cents (.082) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and nine point three cents (.093) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Thirteen. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 369 (Sugar Creek Stormwater Subdistrict), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 2552, adopted March 13, 1974, shall be Two Hundred Twenty-six Thousand Four Hundred Forty-nine Dollars ($226,449.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of five point eight cents (.058) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, five point one cents (.051) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and six point nine cents (.069) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Fourteen. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 448 (Missouri River - Bonfds), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 3465, adopted March 22,1978, shall be Zero Dollars ($0.00), which sum will be 305 produced by the rate of zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for agricultural property, zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Fifteen. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 449 (Meramec River Basin - M.S.D. Southwest), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 3482, adopted March 29,1978, shall be Zero Dollars ($0.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for agricultural property, zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Sixteen. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 453 (Shrewsbury Branch of River des Peres), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 3484, adopted April 12,1978, shall be Nineteen Thousand One Hundred Thirty-six Dollars ($19,136.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of six cents (.060) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, six point three cents (.063) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and eight point two cents (.082) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Seventeen. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 454 (Seminary Branch of River des Peres), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 3485, adopted April 12,1978, shall be Two Hundred Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred Forty-eight Dollars ($220,748.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of six point six cents (.066) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, seven point four cents (.074) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and seven point six cents (.076) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Eighteen. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 455 (Black Creek), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 3486, adopted April 12,1978, shall be Zero Dollars ($0.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Nineteen. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 1 of the River des Peres 306 Watershed (Creve Coeur-Frontenac Area), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 24, adopted June 20,1955, and as enlarged by annexation thereto of the area described in District Ordinance No.1719 adopted February 13,1968, shall be Zero Dollars ($0.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, zero cents (.00) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and zero cents (.000) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Twenty. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 4 of the River des Peres Watershed (North Affton Area), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 22, adopted June 20,1955, and as such part was enlarged by District Ordinance No.190, adopted April 7,1958, shall be Fifty-eight Thousand One Hundred Eighty-six Dollars ($58,186.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of seven point two cents (.072) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, seven point six cents (.076) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and eight point five cents (.085) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Twenty -One. The amount of taxes which shall be levied, assessed and collected in the year 2011 on all taxable tangible property within that part of the corporate limits of St. Louis County lying within Subdistrict No. 7 of the River des Peres Watershed (Wellston Area), as defined and delineated by District Ordinance No. 409, adopted June 16,1960, and as such part was enlarged by District Ordinance No. 2497, adopted November 8,1973, shall be Thirty-six Thousand One Hundred Eighty-nine Dollars ($36,189.00), which sum will be produced by the rate of ten cents (.100) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for residential property, ten cents (.100) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for commercial property and ten cents (.100) per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for personal property. Section Twenty -Two. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. 307 FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET 308 USER CHARGE ORDINA)CES 309 WASTEWATER ORDINANCE NO.13021 AN ORDINANCE, repealing and superseding Ordinance No.12905 adopted June 11, 2009, and enacting a new ordinance in lieu thereof establishing a new Section Six, Back Billing, pertaining to Wastewater User Charges. WHEREAS, The Metropolitan St, Louis Sewer District, a body corporate, a municipal corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Missouri (herein called the "District"), now owns and operates a revenue producing sewer and drainage system serving the District and its inhabitants (the "System") and pursuant to Section 3,020(1) of the Charter of the District adopted by the voters within the District for its government (the "Charter"), has the power "to maintain, operate, reconstruct, and improve the same as a comprehensive sewer and drainage system, and to make additions, betterments, and extensions thereto; to protect the public health and welfare by preventing or abating the pollution of water; and , , , [has] all the rights, privileges, and jurisdiction necessary or proper for carrying such powers into execution"; and WHEREAS, the District is subject to the provisions of the federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq., commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act (the "Federal Clean Water Act") and the Missouri Clean Water Law, H 644.006 et seq. R.S.MO. 1986, as amended (the "Missouri Clean Water Law") the objectives of which are to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters; and WHEREAS, the District has obtained construction grants (the "Grants") from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources ("MDNR") and the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") for improvements to the System and has entered into grant agreements with such governmental agencies as a condition to obtaining such Grants (the "Grant Agreements"); and WHEREAS, the federal regulations promulgated pursuant to the Federal Clean Water Act and the District's Grant Agreements require the District to "review not less often than every two years the wastewater contribution of users and user classes, the total cost of operation and maintenance of the treatment works, and its approved user charge system ... and to revise the charges for users or user classes to accomplish the following: (1) Maintain the proportionate distribution of operation and maintenance costs among users and user classes as required herein; (2) generate sufficient revenue to pay the total operation and maintenance costs necessary to the proper operation and maintenance (including replacement) of the treatment works ...' ;and WHEREAS, Section 3.020 (16) of the Plan of the District authorizes the Board of Trustees "No establish by ordinance a schedule or schedules of rates, rentals, and other charges, to be collected from all the real property served by the sewer facilities of the District, whether public or private, and to prescribe the manner in which and time at which such rates, rentals, and charges are to be paid, and to change such schedule or schedules from time to time as the Board may deem necessary, proper, or advisable, and to collect or enforce collection of all such charges. Such schedule or schedules may be based upon any classifications or sub -classifications which the Board may determine to be fair and reasonable ... including but not limited to: (a) the consumption of water on premises connected with such facilities, taking into consideration commercial, industrial, and agricultural use of water; (b) the number and kind of plumbing fixtures connected with such facilities; (c) the number of persons served by such facilities; or (d) any combination of the factors enumerated. Any such rates, rentals, or other charges against public property shall be paid out of the general treasury of the public body, agency, corporation, or authority owning 310 -1- such property.'; and WHEREAS, Section 7.040 of the Charter of the District established a Rate Commission to review and make recommendations to the Board of Trustees regarding all proposed changes in wastewater rates, storm water rates and tax rates or change in the structure of any of the foregoing; and WHEREAS, the Rate Commission, after having conducted public hearings and weighing evidence regarding the proposed wastewater user rate change, issued its Wastewater Rate Change Amendment Report on April 1, 2008, which recommended the wastewater user rates as hereinafter adopted; and WHEREAS, through Resolution No. 2783, adopted May 23, 2008, the Board of Trustees accepted said Wastewater Rate Change Amendment Report as issued by the Rate Commission on April 1, 2008. WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees (the "Board") has determined that it is appropriate to revise the schedule of Wastewater User Charges as provided in this Ordinance to provide for the determination and billing of such user charges; and WHEREAS, the Board is concerned with the impact of the Wastewater User Charges as provided by this Ordinance on low income customers of the District and the Board has adopted a low income assistance program (the "Low Income Assistance Program") to provide a "low income assistance credit" on bills for Wastewater User Charges to "eligible low income customers" pursuant to Ordinance No.12686 of the District; and WHEREAS, the revenues to be derived from the Wastewater User Charges will be set aside in a separate fund and used for the purposes of operating, maintaining and replacing the Wastewater System in the District, as herein provided; and WHEREAS, the Wastewater User Charges bear a substantial relationship to and are designed to cover the costs of operating, maintaining and replacing the Wastewater System, as herein provided; and WHEREAS, the Board does hereby find and determine that the imposition of the schedule of increased Wastewater User Charges as provided in this Ordinance, is necessary to enable the District to operate its Wastewater System on a sound basis, to satisfy the requirements of the Plan, the Federal Clean Water Act, and the Missouri Clean Water Law, and to comply with the mandates of the, the District's Grant Agreements, and the rules and regulations of the EPA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ff ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT: Section One. Definitions of Words and Terms. In addition to words and terms defined elsewhere in this Ordinance, the following words and terms as used in this Ordinance shall have the following meanings, unless some other meaning is plainly intended: "Approved Meter" means a water meter meeting the standards of meters used by the City of St. Louis Water Division, the St. Louis County Water Company, or the public water supplier which provides water service to such Property, or a sewage flow meter satisfactory to the District. "Base Charge" means the sum of the System Availability Charge and the Billing and Collection Charges pursuant to Section Three of this Ordinance. "Billing and Collection Charges" means the charges established by the District pursuant to Section Three of this Ordinance, •7- 311 which are designed to recover the cost related to issuing and collecting bills. "Best Equated Period" means a 90 to 92 day period of water usage for Metered Residential Property between November and April of the preceding winter period when lawn watering and other outdoor water uses are at a minimum and metered water use can best be equated to Wastewater discharges; provided that if the water bill issued during such period covers water usage for a period less than 90 days or more than 92 days the Best Equated Period shall mean a 91 day period and water usage shall be calculated based on average daily usage for the actual billing period. If water usage is less than 1 ccf for the aforesaid 90 to 92 day period, and water service remained active for said period, a minimum water usage of 1 ccf shall be imposed for said "Metered Residential Property". If water service is instituted after the aforesaid 90 to 92 day period, an average water usage of 8 ccf shall be imposed for said "Metered Residential Property" until such time as the actual "Best Equated Period" data can be established. "Biochemical Oxygen Demand" or "BOD" means the quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter in S days as determined by Standard Test Procedures and expressed in milligrams per liter. "Board" means the Board of Trustees of the District. "Capital Charge" means that portion of the total charges for wastewater services provided by the District which is established for debt retirement, construction or reconstruction of the Wastewater System, and any other lawfid purpose of the District or its sub districts and not considered part of the Wastewater User Charges, or the Storm Water User Charges. Chemical Oxygen Demand" or "COD" means the quantity of oxygen utilized in the chemical oxidation of organic and inorganic matter as determined by Standard Test Procedures and expressed in milligrams per liter. "Compliance Charge" means the charge established by the District pursuant to Section Three (A)(3) of this Ordinance which is designed to recover all District compliance activities for Non -Residential Properties required to comply with federal environmental regulations which are not recovered by specific environmental permit fees, Wastewater Monitoring Fees, or other related fees. "Contributed Wastewater Volume" means the quantity of water-bome wastes emanating from Property and, specifically, (1) for Metered Single -Unit Residential Property, means billed water usage during the Best Equated Period; (2) for Metered Multi -Unit ResidentiallNon-Residential Property, means either (a) billed water usage throughout the year with exemption allowances for any water that does not enter the Wastewater System, or (b) measured Wastewater volume; and (3) for Unmetered Residential Property, means average indoor water usage characteristics of various housing attributes, as defined in the Rate Study, applied to the number of rooms and plumbing fixtures of each User's Property, as determined by the District. "District" means The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. "Extra Strength Surcharges" means the Extra Strength Surcharges imposed by Section Three (A)(2) of this Ordinance. "Metered Non-ResidentiaUMulti-Unit Residential Property" means Property used both for non-residential and residential purposes which consists of one or more non-residential units and one or more residential dwelling units connected to an approved meter. "Metered Property" means all Property connected to an Approved Meter through which the amount of water usage is measured. 312 -3- "Metered Residential Property" means Property used only for human residency which consists of one or more residential units connected to an approved meter. "Non-residential Property" means all Property other than Residential Property. "Normal Wastewater" means waters or wastes having (a) a 5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) not greater than 300 milligrams per liter; and (b) containing not more than 300 milligrams per liter of Suspended Solids (SS); and (c) having a Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) not greater than 600 milligrams per liter. "Ordinance" means this Ordinance of the District unless a different Ordinance is indicated. "Owner" or "Owners" means the Person or Persons designated as the owner or owners of record of Property as set forth in the records of the office of the respective Recorders of Deeds for the City of St. Louis or for St. Louis County, Missouri. "Person" means any individual, firm, proprietorship, partnership, company, municipality, state, federal or local governmental entity, association, society, corporation, group, or other entity. "Plan" means the Proposed Plan of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District as approved by the voters of the City of St. Louis and St. Louis County at a special election held on February 9,1954 and amended by said voters on November 7, 2000. "Pollutant" means any material or substance, toxic or otherwise, discharged to the Wastewater System which either singularly or in combination with other materials or substances interferes with, disrupts, or inhibits the Wastewater System's operations, or is not in compliance with specific prohibitions or standards developed by District, federal, state or local governments, or passes through the Wastewater System in a concentration which violates established effluent regulations or water quality standards. Property" means an improved lot or parcel of real property, whether public or private, which is served by the Wastewater System. "Rate Commission" means that body established pursuant to Section 7.040 of the Charter of the District to review and make recommendations to the Board of Trustees regarding all proposed changes in wastewater rates, storm water rates and tax rates or change in the structure of any of the foregoing. "Residential Property" means Property used only for human residency. "Room/Fixture Charges" means the charges established by the District pursuant to Section Three of this Ordinance billed to each User Account based on the number of rooms and plumbing fixtures in such User's Property as determined by the District. "Served" or "Service" means Property with a sewer connected, either directly or indirectly, to the District's Wastewater System, or Property which otherwise discharges Wastewater directly or indirectly into the Wastewater System; or if the discharge of such substances there from ultimately enters the District's Wastewater System. "Sewer Use Ordinance" means Ordinance No.12559 of the District, adopted October 7, 2008, as amended. "Standard Test Procedures" means "Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for Analysis of Pollutants Under Clean Water Act" (40 CFR 136), as supplemented and amended from time to time. "Storm Water User Charges" means the charges established by District Ordinance No.12560, adopted October 7, 2008, as amended. -4- 313 "Suspended Solids" or "SS" means solids that either float on the surface of, or are suspended in water, Wastewater, or other liquids; as determined by analysis for non -filterable residue, in accordance with Standard Test Procedures and expressed in milligrams per liter. "System Availability Charge" means the charge established by the District pursuant to Section Three of this Ordinance which is designed to recover a portion of the costs related to infiltration and inflow. "Unit" means the portion of Residential Property designed for occupancy by a single person or single family. "Unmetered Residential Property" means Residential Property which is not connected to an Approved Meter. "User" means: (1) the Person occupying the Property; or (2) Owner of Property; or (3) the Person holding a permit for water service to the Property Served by the Wastewater System; or (4) any Person Served by the Wastewater System. "User Account" means each separate account to which a bill for Wastewater User Charges is issued by the District. "Volume Charge" means the Volume Charges established by the District pursuant to Section Three of this Ordinance billed to each User Account based on Contributed Wastewater Volume. "Wastewater" means the water -borne wastes emanating from Property, together with such groundwater, surface water, or storm water which enters the Wastewater System. "Wastewater Monitoring Fees" means the Schedule of Wastewater Monitoring Fees referred to in Section Four of this Ordinance and set forth in Appendix II. "Wastewater System" means the entire sewer and drainage system owned and operated by the District for the collection, transportation, storage, handling, and treatment of Wastewater, to serve the needs of the District and its inhabitants and others, including all appurtenances and facilities connected therewith or relating thereto, together with all extensions, improvements, additions and enlargements thereto hereafter made or acquired by the District. "Wastewater User Charges" means the applicable charges established by Section Three of this Ordinance, which consist of that portion of the charges of the District, which. are established in a proportional and adequate manner to pay the cost of operation and maintenance (including replacement) of the Wastewater System in accordance with the requirements of the EPA and the MDNR. Section Two. Establishment of Wastewater User Charges. There are hereby ratified, confirmed and established for services provided by the District to any Property Served by the Wastewater System, the Wastewater User Charges as set forth in Appendix I. All such Wastewater User Charges shall be in addition to any applicable Capital Charges. The District's Wastewater User Charges must comply with the following mandates (the "Environmental Mandates"): (i) to have an approved Wastewater User Charge as required by the Federal Clean Water Act, the Missouri Clean Water Law and its Grant Agreements, and (ii) to provide necessary funds to operate, maintain and replace its Wastewater System so as to provide adequate Service to District residents. The District finds that it is necessary and in the public interest to implement the schedule of Wastewater User Charges as herein provided in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare and to insure the District's continued compliance with the Environmental Mandates. Section Three. Wastewater User Charges. 314 -5- (A) Metered Property. (1) Each metered property shall be charged a Base Charge and a Volume Charge as set forth in Appendix I. The Volume Charge shall be calculated separately for each Property, using the most current determination of Contributed Wastewater Volume. (2) Extra Strength Surcharges. Extra Strength Surcharges for the treatment of wastes containing Suspended Solids, Biochemical Oxygen Demand or Chemical Oxygen Demand exceeding Normal Wastewater strengths are hereby established and shall be billed to and collected from Non-residential Property Served by the Wastewater System at the rates for each User Account set forth in Appendix I, and shall be collected in addition to the charges imposed by Subsections (1) and (3) hereof. (a) A User shall be subject to Extra Strength Surcharges in any month if that User's water usage in such month equals or exceeds eight thousand cubic feet. (b) Each User subject to Extra Strength Surcharges shall submit to the District on forms supplied by the District pursuant to the Sewer Use Ordinance, a certified statement setting forth the strength and volume of Wastewater discharged by the User into the Wastewater System or into any sewer connected thereto. The data set forth in such statement shall be obtained from samples collected in accordance with accepted procedures from the manhole or adequate place as described in the Sewer Use Ordinance at a time period representative of normal operational conditions and analyzed utilizing Standard Test Procedures. (c) Analytical data reported by the User discharging such Wastewater will be considered current for each subsequent billing period until such data is reported inaccurate and replaced by updated certified data by said User. The results of routine scheduled sampling and analyses by the District may be used in lieu of data reported by said User if such data is found to be not current or in error. (d) An Extra Strength Surcharge shall be collected from any User subject to Extra Strength Surcharges as provided for herein for the discharge into the Wastewater System of Suspended Solids (SS) which average concentration exceeds 300 milligrams per liter or Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) which average concentration exceeds 300 milligrams per liter, with said Extra Strength Surcharge ("ESS") calculated for each billing period according to the following formula, to wit: 0.00624 x V x [(SS-300) x RSS + (BOD-300) x RBOD] ESS= 2000 (e) If the BOD/COD ratio of a User's Wastewater is equal to or less than 0.35 the BOD measurement may not be considered representative of the User's actual Wastewater strength. The District may substitute Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) which average concentration exceeds 600 milligrams per liter, with said Extra Strength Surcharge ("ESS") calculated for each billing period according to the following formula, to wit: 0.00624 x V x [(SS-300) x RSS + (COD-600) x RCOD] 315 -6- ESS = 2000 In the above formulas the following terms shall mean: ESS = Extra Strength Surcharges. 300 = Maximum concentration of total BOD in Normal Wastewater in milligrams per liter. 300 = Maximum concentration of total Suspended Solids in Normal Wastewater in milligrams per liter. 600 = Maximum concentration of total COD in Normal Wastewater in milligrams per liter, 0.00624 = Conversion factor for milligrams per liter to pounds per hundred cubic feet. V = Volume of water usage or Wastewater discharged expressed in hundred cubic feet. RSS = Rate for SS in dollars per ton. RBOD = Rate for BOD in dollars per ton. RCOD = Rate for COD in dollars per ton. 2,000 = The number of pounds per ton. (f) All Extra Strength Surcharges shall be calculated separately for each Property using the Wastewater flow proportioned average strength concentration for each strength parameter and the most current determination of Contributed Wastewater Volume. (3) Non-residential Property Compliance Charge. A Compliance Charge shall be collected from all Non- residential Property Served by the Wastewater System at the rate for each User Account as set forth in Appendix I and shall be collected in addition to the charges imposed by Subsections (1) and (2) hereof. (4) Registration of Unmetered Water Supply. In the event Property is supplied either in whole or in part with water from wells or any source other than a public water supplier, then such wells or other source of supply shall be registered with the Director of Finance of the District. If such supply serves Metered Property and is not measured by a water meter, or is measured by a water meter not acceptable to the District, then in such case, the User, at his own expense shall install and maintain an Approved Meter connected to such water supply. Whenever a new supplier or source of water other than a public water supplier shall be put into use by Metered Property, such source of water shall be registered with the Director of Finance of the District within thirty days. (S) Metered Water Not Entering the Wastewater System. Where it can be shown to the satisfaction of the District that a portion of the water as measured by an Approved Meter does not enter the Wastewater System, then the District is hereby authorized to determine, in such manner and by such method as may be practicable, the percentage of the water measured by the Approved Meter which enters the Wastewater System. In such case, Wastewater User Charges shall be based upon the percentage of the metered water entering the Wastewater System. Additional Approved Meters may be required or permitted at the User's expense in such manner as to measure the quantity of Contributed Wastewater Volume entering the Wastewater System from the Property of such User. Applications requesting 316 -7- consideration for a reduction in the Wastewater Service Charge, because of water not entering the Wastewater System, shall be made to the Director of Finance of the District, on forms provided by the District. (6) Requirement of an Approved Meter for Non -Residential Property. All Non -Residential Property within the District shall be connected to an Approved Meter. In the event Property within the District is owned by a municipality and is served by water provided by such municipality and not connected to an Approved Meter, the District shall provide a method for estimating Wastewater discharge by such Property which is fair and equitable, in lieu of connection to an Approved Meter, and shall bill such municipality for Wastewater User Charges as provided for Metered Property pursuant to this Ordinance based on such estimated Wastewater usage. (B) Unmetered Residential Property. (1) Each unmetered residential property shall be charged a Base Charge and a Room/Fixture Charge as set forth in Appendix I. Such charges shall be calculated separately for each Property using the most current available data regarding the number of rooms and plumbing fixtures in such Property. The Director of Finance shall determine the number of rooms and plumbing fixtures in such Property from the records of the City of St. Louis Water Division or other public water suppliers, from the records of the Office of Assessor of the City of St. Louis or St. Louis County, or from on site inspection. A User of Unmetered Residential Property who considers the determination by the District of the number of rooms and plumbing fixtures for which such User is billed Wastewater User Charges to be inaccurate or erroneous may appeal such determination as herein provided. (2) Right of Entry and Inspection. The District shall have the power to enter on any Property for the purposes of examining the use made of its Wastewater System, the number of rooms and plumbing fixtures in such Property, the number and kind of plumbing fixtures connected with such Wastewater System, and for the purpose of inspecting or reading the Approved Meter connected to such Property. When such examination gives reason to believe that the usage of water on such Property places a burden on the Wastewater System in excess of that for which the User of such Property is being billed then the Wastewater discharged from such Property shall be measured, at the expense of the User, by a water meter or meters or by a Wastewater flow meter or meters. If such measurement shows that the flow of Wastewater is excessive, Wastewater User Charges shall be billed and collected for such measured usage as for Metered Property. (C) Application of Wastewater User Charge Revenues. All revenues collected from Wastewater User Charges shall be segregated, credited and deposited in a Wastewater Revenue Fund to be established and maintained by the Director of Finance of the District, and shall be used solely to pay for the costs of the operation (including billing, administration and overhead), repair, maintenance, improvement, renewal, replacement and reconstruction of the District's Wastewater System. Section Four. Wastewater Monitoring Fees. When the Sewer Use Ordinance of the District or regulations of the federal government or state government require periodic monitoring of Wastewater from Non-residential Property, whether for strength calculations, for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System compliance, or for pretreatment program requirements, the User of such Property monitored shall furnish the District at least one report for each quarterly calendar period from an independent testing laboratory satisfactory to the District, which report shall set forth the information required by the District on forms supplied by the District. As an alternative to furnishing the reports herein required, the User of such Property may request the District to collect the necessary samples and perform the analysis thereof. If the District agrees to so act, the User of such Property shall be billed for and agree to pay all costs for personnel, material -8- 317 and equipment used to collect and analyze samples from the User's Wastewater as set forth in the schedule of charges in Appendix II hereof. Each User shall be billed based on the number of samples collected and the number and types of analyses perfomied during each billing period and billed in accordance with current billing procedures. A User shall not be billed for more than four (4) such samplings per year for each connection to the Wastewater System. Sampling and analysis undertaken for purposes other than required periodic monitoring shall not be billed for Wastewater Monitoring Fees under this section. The District may terminate such collection and analysis at any time and it shall thereafter be the obligation of the User of such Property to furnish the test information called for above from an independent testing laboratory. Section Five. Pollutants. Any User which discharges any Pollutants which cause an increase in the cost of managing the effluent or sludge from the Wastewater System shall pay for such increased costs. Section Six. All bills for Wastewater User Charges shall be prepared by the District and shall be issued monthly for services provided in the preceding month. The issuance of any monthly bill may be delayed by the District for good cause. On or after May 1, 2004, the Wastewater User Charges shall be billed to the Owner or Owners of the property served by the Wastewater System. Such Wastewater User Charges shall also constitute a personal obligation of any User of the Wastewater System regardless of to whom the bill for Wastewater User Charges is sent and shall constitute a charge and a lien against the Property Served, whether or not a notice of lien has been served. For the District's convenience, all individual Wastewater User Charges may be combined with any other charges of the District, and all such charges may be billed together. In the event of a change in Owner or User of Property or termination of Service to Property during a billing period, application may be made to the Director of Finance of the District for a refund or proration of Wastewater User Charges for such billing period. The Owner of Metered Residential Property containing more than one unit shall have the option of being charged on the basis of Best Equated Period, The Owner may obtain an application for such change from the Director of Finance. Upon receipt of an Application of Change in billing basis for said Property the change in billing will take effect not sooner than sixty (60) days from receipt of the application. Once an Owner of Metered Residential Property containing more than one (1) unit has elected to be charged on the basis of Best Equated Period, that Owner shall not be permitted to again change. In the event wastewater service is being provided to any parcel of real property and said parcel is being under -billed or not being billed at all, the District shall have the authority to charge the owner of said parcel retroactively for a period not to exceed one and one- half (11/2) years from the date of discovery. In the event said parcel is being over -billed by the District, and the current owner of said parcel can verify such over -billing, then the District shall refund the current owner of the parcel any amount verified to be overpaid by said owner. The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District will not collect Wastewater User Charges from the owner of real property when it is known that said real property is connected to a septic tank. Upon notification from the property owner that certain real property which is 318 - 9 - connected to a septic tank is being billed by the District for Wastewater User Charges, upon verification, the District will refund to the owner any and all of said Wastewater User Charges so collected from said owner. Section Seven. Charge for Late Payments. On or after July 1, 2009, any Wastewater User charges billed that are not paid by the due date indicated on any bill rendered shall bear a late payment charge equal to three -fourths of one percent (0.75%) per month, or nine percent (9%) per annum, of the amount of the bill rendered and is herby imposed for each month or portion thereof that the bill remains unpaid beyond the due date. Section Eight. Wastewater User Charges Constitute a Lien. The Wastewater User Charges shall constitute a lien upon the Property Served on the date a bill is rendered for Wastewater Service, and said lien shall have the same priority as taxes levied for state and county purposes. The District may cause a notice of lien for non-payment of such charges to be filed in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds within and for the City of St. Louis or St. Louis County, depending upon where such Property Served is located. Such notice of lien shall state the amount of the delinquent Wastewater User Charges, and shall adequately describe the Property against which such lien is asserted. A copy of such notice of lien shall be mailed to the Owner of the Property at the last address on file with the District and the filing of such notice in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds may be deferred as a matter of grace for not more than thirty (30) days from the mailing date. All Wastewater User Charges that remain unpaid shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed the lower of nine percent (9%) per annum or the maximum legal rate from the time a notice of lien is filed with the appropriate recorder of deeds as herein prescribed, until such time as the account is closed. After such notice of lien is filed of record, the fees of the Recorder for filing and releasing said lien shall also be payable to the District as a prerequisite to releasing said lien. Section Nine. Termination of Service for Nonpayment. When any Wastewater User Charge has not been paid and has been delinquent for a period in excess of three months, the District is authorized to order the water supply to be shut off for the Property for which the Wastewater User Charge is delinquent or to remove or close any sewer connections, or both, until payment of the delinquent charge together with the reasonable costs involved in shutting off and turning on the water, or closing and reopening the sewer connection, as the case maybe, have been paid. When any Wastewater User Charge has not been paid and has been delinquent for more than fifteen days after the due date, then the District may refuse to issue to the Owner and/or User a permit to connect any other Property owned or controlled by said Owner and/or User to the Wastewater System or Stone Water System; or may refuse to review any plans submitted by or on behalf of such Owner and/or User; or issue any permits requested by or on behalf of such Owner and/or User; or refuse to contract for any purpose with or accept Wastewater or Storm Water from any such Owner and/or User. Section Ten. Remedies. Whenever any charge is unpaid after ninety days from the date the bill for such charges was rendered, then the amount overdue may be collected by any or all of the three procedures: (A) by assignment to a collection agency; or (B) by suit or other proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction; or (C) by enforcement of the lien provided herein. -10- 319 The District shall have the power to sue any Owner and/or User, jointly and severally, in a civil action to recover delinquent charges plus the late payment charge and interest on the delinquent bill, plus all costs incurred by the District in connection with the filing and enforcement of such lien and the prosecution and collection of such charges including court costs, fees for transcript judpients, special process servers, credit reports, video reports, sewer and/or water shutoff costs, other related fees, and reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court. Section Eleven. False Information. It shall be unlawful for any Person to furnish any false report or information to the District which would reduce any charge imposed by the District. Section Twelve. Violation of Ordinance. Any Person violating Section Eleven of this Ordinance shall be deemed gailty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not less than $50.00 nor more than $500.00. The imposition of such penalty shall in no way restrict or deprive the District of its right to pursue any other remedy it may have for the collection of any delinquent bill for Charges. Section Thirteen. Wastewater User Charge Review. The Board shall regularly review the Wastewater User needs of the District and Wastewater User Charges, usually as a part of a Rate Proposal from the Rate Commission, to assure the appropriateness of the Wastewater User Charges. (A) Maintain the proportional distribution of operation, maintenance and replacement costs among User classes. (B) Provide adequate revenues to cover operation, maintenance and replacement costs. (C) Provide adequate revenues for the payment of debt service on or required by the provisions of any outstanding bonds. Section Fourteen. Notice of Rates. Each User Account shall be notified at least annually in conjunction with a regular billing for Wastewater User Charges as to: (A) the rate schedule in effect; and (B) that part of Wastewater User Charges attributable to wastewater services. Section Fifteen. Deposit of Funds. The fiords received from the collection of any of the aforesaid charges shall be deposited daily as received by the Secretary -Treasurer of the District, and shall be deposited in duly designated bank accounts, and such moneys may be appropriated and used for the purposes of the District as herein provided. Section Sixteen, Collection Offices. Collection offices may be established at convenient locations throughout the District. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to enter into contracts with the owners or operators of business establishments to provide collection services at such locations as are selected and may provide in such contracts for the payment by the District of a fee to the collecting establishment for rendering such collection services. Section Seventeen. Appeals. Any Person who considers the Wastewater User Charges billed to such Person pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance or any other determination by the District pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance to be illegal, inaccurate or erroneous may request a review thereof by the Director of Finance or his designate within thirty (30) days of (i) the bill to such Person for Wastewater User Charges with respect to such Property, or (ii) written notice to such Person of a determination by the District which is contested. The determination by the Director of Finance may be appealed by such Person to the Executive Director, by written notice of 320 -ll- appeal filed with the Director of Finance within thirty (30) days of his determination. The determination by the Executive Director shall be considered a final order of the District. Section Eighteen. Judicial Review. Any Person or Persons jointly or severally aggrieved by any final order of the Executive Director of the District may seek judicial review of such decision or pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 12.110 of the District's Plan. Section Nineteen. Adjustment Review Committee. A committee, to be known as the Adjustment Review Committee (ARC), is hereby established and shall meet, at minimum, once a month to conduct its business. The ARC shall be comprised of the voting members which are the District's Director of Finance, Assistant Director of Finance, the Secretary -Treasurer, and General Counsel. Non -voting members are the Accounts Receivable Manager and Audit Administrator. For purposes of Section Nineteen of this Ordinance the following terms as used in this Ordinance shall have the following meanings, unless some other meaning is plainly intended. Adjustment -any change in billing resulting from errors and/or changes in circumstances. Write-off- an uncollecctible amount due the District according to State or Federal Statute or as determined by majority approval of the ARC. Settlement - agreement between the customer and the District to alleviate all or part of a delinquent condition. On a monthly basis, the ARC shall review and properly record in the minutes all prior monthly billing adjustments as approved and presented by the Accounts Receivable Manager. These billing adjustments may result from but are not limited to; misapplied payment, ccf adjustment, reduction factor, water -off, transfer of balance due to bankruptcy notice, new occupantlwater meter registrant, bank encoding error, or water back-up. All write-offs or settlements of accounts shall require a majority of the ARC voting members to meet and discuss before approval. No write-off or settlement in excess of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) and less than Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) shall be effective unless reviewed and approved by three (3) out of the four (4) voting members of the ARC. Any write-off or settlement greater than Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000,00) shall require Finance Committee approval or ratification, The suspension of these Hiles may occur when a time constraint exists and a decision must be made before the next scheduled meeting, or a situation exists from, but not limited to; foreclosure, sheriff or county tax sale, Land Reutilization Authority, land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority, or discharged bankruptcy. In these instances, no settlements or write-offs in excess of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) shall be effective unless reviewed and approved by three (3) out of four (4) voting members of the ARC on an individual basis or at a special meeting as requested by any of the ARC members. All such instances will be reported at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the ARC and recorded in the minutes. ARC activity will be reported to the Board's Finance Committee on a monthly basis. The committee shall perform any other such duties relating to billing and collection policies. Such duties shall be reported to the Executive Director and Board of Trustees. -12 - 321 Section Twenty. Severability. The Board hereby declares that if any section, pad, sentence or clause of this Ordinance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance, the Board hereby declaring that it would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance without regard to that part hereof that may be held invalid. Section Twenty -One. Prior Ordinances. The provisions contained in this Ordinance shall repeal and supersede Ordinance No. 12754, adopted October 7, 2008, and shall take the place of and supersede the provisions of all prior ordinances relating to the same subject matter, which are herewith inconsistent. This Ordinance shall not be so construed as to relieve any Person from the payment of any charge which is due and payable under the provisions of any prior ordinance, nor to bar the collection of same by any and all of the means provided for in said prior ordinance. This Ordinance shall not be so construed as to relieve any Person from any penalty heretofore incurred by the violation of any prior ordinance nor to bar the prosecution of any such violation in the manner provided therein. The foregoing Ordinance was adopted January 14, 2010. 322 -13- APPENDIX I WASTEWATER USER CHARGES July 1, 2009 July 1, 2010 July 1, 2011 Charge Charge Charge METERED PROPERTY (per Month/per User Account) Base Charge $10.90 $11.40 $11.85 Volume Charge $1.92/100 $2.02/100 $2.11/100 All Volume Cubic Feet Cubic Feet Cubic Feet UNMETERED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY (per Montblper User Account) Base Charge $10.90 SHAD $11.85 Room/Fixture Charge: Room (each room) $1.25 $1.32 $1.38 Water Closet (each fixture) $4.69 $4.93 $5.15 Bath (each fixture) $3.91 $4.11 $4.30 Separate Shower (each fixture) $3.91 $4.11 $4.30 NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY (per Month/per User Account) Extra Strength Surcharges if water usage equals or exceeds 8000 cubic feet per month: Suspended Solids (SS) * $218.90 $222.62 $231.35 Over 300 mg/liter (Milligrams per liter) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) * S551.52 $596.72 $620.14 Over 300mg11iter (milligrams per liter) Chemical oxygen Demand (COD)* $275.76 $298.36 $310.07 Over 600 mg/liter (milligrams per liter) Base Charge $10.90 $11.40 $11.85 Compliance Charge $29.65 $30.85 $31.95 Per Ton 323 -1- STORMWATER ORDINANCE NO.13125 AN ORDINANCE suspending Ordinance No.13022, adopted January 14, 2010, and enacting a new ordinance in lieu thereof to reinstitute the schedule of monthly Stormwater Service Charge as approved by the voters on March 8,1988, with an emergency clause. WHEREAS, Ordinance No.12560 adopted December 13, 2007, previously established a new schedule of stormwater user charges and repealed and superseded Ordinance No. 9183, adopted January 12,1994, Ordinance No. 9030, adopted June 16,1993, and Ordinance No. 8657, adopted May 3,1992; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No.12789 adopted December 11, 2008, repealed and superseded Ordinance No.12560 adopted December 13, 2007; Ordinance No.12906 adopted June 11, 2009 repealed and superseded Ordinance No.12789 adopted December 11, 2008; and Ordinance No.13022 adopted January 14, 2010 repealed and superseded Ordinance No.12906 adopted June 11, 2009; and WHEREAS, Zweig, et al vs. MSD, Cause No. 08SGCC3051, was initially filed on July 18, 2008, concerning the MSD stormwater user charge as adopted in MSD Ordinance No.12560; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2010, the court handed down Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Jud ani ent and Decree in the first phase oldie bifurcated trial of Zweig, et al vs. MSD, Cause No. 08SGCC03051; and WHEREAS, in light of the court's decision and until final resolution of the case, the District hereby suspends Ordinance No.13022 and enacts a new Ordinance to reinstitute the schedule of monthly Stormwater Service Charge as approved by the voters on March 8,1988, and; WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 7450, adopted May 11, 1988, the District established the Stormwater Service Charges approved by the voters on March 8,1988; and WHEREAS, The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, a body corporate, Municipal Corporation and political subdivision of the State of Missouri (herein called the "District"), was established as a metropolitan sewer district under the provisions of Section 30 of Article VI of the Constitution of the State of Missouri, pursuant to a Plan adopted by the voters of St. Louis City and St. Louis County at a special election held on Tuesday, February 9,1954 (the "Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Plan established the District in the interest of the public health and for the purpose of providing adequate sewer and drainage facilities within the boundaries of the District; and WHEREAS, the Plan empowers the District with jurisdiction, control, possession and supervision of sewer and drainage systems and facilities as may be placed under the District's jurisdiction in the manner provided in the Plan; to maintain, operate, reconstruct and improve the same as a comprehensive sewer and drainage system; to make additions, betterments and extensions thereto; to protect the public health and welfare by preventing or abating the pollution of water; and to have all the rights, privileges and jurisdiction necessary or proper for carrying such powers into execution; and 324 WHEREAS, the stormwater system within the District consists of man made facilities and structures and natural water courses used for collecting and conducting stormwater to, through and from drainage areas to the points of final outlet including, but not limited to, sewers, pipes, inlets, conduits and appurtenant features, canals, creeks, channels, catch basins, ditches, streams, gulches, gullies, flumes, culverts, siphons, retention or detention basins, dams, flood walls, levies, and pumping stations (the "Stormwater System"); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 65 adopted by the Board of Trustees of the District on May 21,1956, the District accepted the maintenance and operation of the portion of the Stormwater System theretofore operated and maintained by the municipalities, sewer districts and other public agencies within the boundaries of the District established under the original Plan (the "Original Area"); and WHEREAS, a special election was held on May 10,1977 pursuant to which additional areas were annexed to the District (the "Annexed Area"); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No.1494 adopted by the Board of Trustees of the District on April 27,1977, the District established a policy regarding the Stormwater System in the Annexed Area which provided that the District would not assume immediate control of the Stormwater System in the Annexed Area, but would provide planning services and work with local municipal authorities and other organizations and groups to coordinate stormwater and drainage programs where such services were requested; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 7691 adopted by the Board of Trustees of the District on February 22,1989, the District established a policy effective April 1,1989, to regulate the construction, alteration and reconstruction of all stormwater and drainage facilities within the District and undertake the operation and maintenance of those portions of the Stormwater System accepted for dedication by the District within the boundaries of the entire District to the extent of available fiords for such purposes; and WHEREAS, the District's Plan authorizes the Board to establish by ordinance charges to be collected from all the real property served by the sewer facilities of the District, whether public or private, such charges to be based upon any classifications or sub- classifications which the Board may determine to be fair and reasonable, and to prescribe the manner in which and time at which such charges are to be paid; and WHEREAS, the District is subject to the provisions of the federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (commonly referred to as the Federal Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq. (the "Federal Clean Water Act"), and the regulations promulgated there under, and WHEREAS, there are continuing and growing threats to the public health, safety and welfare of the District and its residents created by stormwater, including flooding, erosion, water pollution, creation of pest breeding areas, traffic hazards caused by flooding, etc.; and WHEREAS, in connection with the suspension of the Stormwater User Charge and with the re-establishment of the Stormwater Service Charges as herein provided, the District will reinstitute the collection of ad valorem property taxes to be used for the purpose of providing service to the Stormwater System; and WHEREAS, the Board does hereby find and determine that the adoption of this Ordinance is in the public interest of the District and its residents, will further the public purposes of the District, and is desirable and necessary in furtherance of the public health, 325 safety and welfare of the District and its residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT: Section One. Definitions of Words and Terms. In addition to words and terms defined elsewhere in this Ordinance, the following words and terms as used in this Ordinance shall have the following meanings, unless some other meaning is plainly intended, "Area" means the square footage measurement of Property. "Board" means the Board of Trustees of the District. "Dedicated Stormwater Facilities" means those portions of the Stormwater System which have been accepted for dedication by the District as provided in Section Three of this Ordinance. "District" means The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. "Owner or Owners" means both the owner or owners of record of Property as set forth in the records of the office of the respective Recorders of Deeds for the City of St. Louis or for St. Louis County, Missouri. "Person" means any individual, fimi, proprietorship, partnership, company, municipality, state, federal or local governmental entity, association, society, corporation, group, or other entity. "Property" means a lot or parcel of real estate, whether public or private, which is served by the Stormwater System. "Stormwater" means any water or drainage resulting from precipitation which may or may not be mixed with an accumulation of dirt, soil, and other debris or substances collected from the surfaces on which such precipitation falls or flows. "Stormwater Design Standards" means the most current published edition of "Rules and Regulations and Engineering Design Requirements for Sanitary Sewerage and Stormwater Drainage Facilities" and "Standard Construction Specifications for Sewers and Drainage Facilities" as ratified and approved from time to time by the Board. "Stormwater Facility" or "Stormwater Facilities" means various drainage works that may include sewers, pipes, inlets, conduits, manholes, energy dissipation structures, channels, outlets, retentionldetention basins, and other structural components. "Stormwater Service means the planning and regulating of the Stormwater System and all activities described in Appendix I. "Stormwater System" means all man-made facilities, structures, and natural Watercourses used for collecting and conducting Stormwater to, through, and from drainage areas to the points of final outlet including, but not limited to, any and all of the following: sewers, pipes, inlets, conduits and appurtenant features, canals, creeks, channels, catch basins, ditches, streams, rivers, gulches, gullies, flumes, culverts, siphons, retention or detention basins, dams, floodwalls, levees, and pumping stations. "Stormwater Service Charges" means the charges imposed by the District pursuant to this Ordinance. "User" means the occupant or Owner of Property, or any Person served by the Stormwater System. Section Two. Establishment of the Stormwater Service Charges. The Stormwater Service Charges to be imposed on all Property served by the Stormwater System were approved by the voters on March 8,1988. Section Three. Dedication of Stormwater Facilities. The District will accept for dedication all existing or newly 326 constructed Stormwater Facilities as provided by this Section. The Executive Director shall accept the dedication of an existing Stormwater Facility to the District's Stormwater System, provided that the District's final inspection report made prior to the acceptance of dedication confirms that such facility is located in public rights -of -way or easements granted to and accepted by the District and which is not encroached upon, is intended for public use, and meets the District's current policy on Stormwater maintenance as provided in Section Four of this Ordinance. Upon completion of construction of new Stormwater Facilities for which plans are received, reviewed and approved by the District after April 1, 1989, the Stormwater Facilities shall be dedicated to the District and the Executive Director shall accept the dedication of such Stormwater Facilities to the District's Stormwater System, provided that the facilities have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans, the District's final inspection reports made prior to the acceptance of dedication confirm that the facilities meet the Stormwater Design Standards, and the facilities meet the District's current policy on Stormwater maintenance as provided in Section Four of this Ordinance. Section Four. Maintenance of Dedicated Stormwater Facilities. The District shall maintain all Dedicated Stormwater Facilities pursuant to policies established from time to time by resolution of the Board to prioritize the use of monies from the Stormwater Service Charges and other available funds to meet the greatest needs in furtherance of the public health, safety and welfare and in compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act. To the extent of available funds the District shall establish a program of maintenance of Dedicated Stormwater Facilities in accordance with the District's then current Stormwater Maintenance Policy. The Board hereby adopts the Stormwater Maintenance Policy attached hereto as Appendix I. Section Five. Private Stormwater Facilities, The Owner shall be responsible for Stormwater Facilities located on private property where runoff will principally be collected within that property and for all other Stormwater Facilities not maintained by the District per Appendix I. The Owner shall clean and maintain the facility or channel as required to ensure proper operation as required by law or regulation. Where Dedicated Stormwater Facilities are in easements, the Owner of the Property is responsible for maintenance of such easements including lawn mowing, litter pick-up, pest control, removal of blockages and encroachments, etc. The Owner shall place no structures or plantings that interfere with the Stormwater Facility or its operation and maintenance. Section Six. Rules and Regulations. In order to accomplish the purpose of this Ordinance to protect the Stormwater System within the District, to secure the best results from the construction, operation, and maintenance thereof, and to prevent damage and misuse of any of the Drainage Facilities, improvements, or properties within the District, the Executive Director may make and enforce rules and regulations that are necessary and reasonable: (A) To prescribe the manner in which storm sewers, ditches, channels, and other Stormwater Facilities are to be designed, installed, adjusted, used, altered, maintained, replaced, or otherwise changed. (B) To prescribe the manner in which Stormwater Facilities are operated. (C) To facilitate the enforcement of this Ordinance. (D) To protect the Stormwater System, and to prescribe the manner of its use by any public or private person, firm, or corporation. 327 (E) To protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Section Seven. Permits and Plan Review. All plans and designs for all Stormwater Facilities within the boundaries of the District shall be submitted for approval, revision or rejection by the District pursuant to the Plan, applicable Ordinances and the District Stormwater Design Standards. Except as preempted or otherwise delegated by EPA or MDNR, the District shall provide all stormwater plan and design review, permit control and construction inspection. Section Eight. Stormwater Service Charge Policy. Stormwater Service Charges will be imposed on all Property served by the Stormwater System within the District, whether public or private. Section Nine. Stormwater Service Charges. Beginning with the Becht a Date of this Ordinance, the District shall impose the Stormwater Service Charges as shown in Appendix II. Section Ten. Billing. All bills for Stormwater Service Charges shall be prepared by the District and shall be issued monthly for services provided in the preceding month. The issuance of any monthly bill may be delayed by the District for good cause. The Stormwater Service Charges shall be billed to the Owner of the Property or to the Person billed by the District for Stormwater Service Charges for such Property. Such Stormwater Service Charges shall also constitute a personal obligation of both the Owner and any User of the Property regardless of to whom the bill for Stormwater Service Charges is sent and shall constitute a charge and a lien against the Property served. For the District's convenience, all Stormwater Service Charges may be combined with any other charges of the District, and all such charges may be billed together. In the event of a change in Owner or User of Property during a billing period, application may be made to the Director of Finance of the District for a refund or prorating of Stormwater Service Charges for such billing period. In the event stormwater services are being provided to any parcel of real property and said parcel is being under -billed or is not being billed at all, the District shall have the authority to charge the owner of said parcel retroactively for a period not to exceed one and one-half (1 %) years from the date of discovery. In the event said parcel is being over -billed by the District, and the current owner of said parcel can verify such over- billing, then the District shall refund the current owner of the parcel any amount verified to be overpaid by said owner. Section Eleven. Charge for Late Payments. On or after July 1, 2009, any Stormwater Service Charges billed that are not paid by the due date indicated on any bill rendered shall bear a late payment charge equal to three -fourths of one percent (0.75%) per month, or nine percent (9%) per annum, of the amount of the bill rendered and is herby imposed for each month or portion thereof that the bill remains unpaid beyond the due date. Section Twelve. Stormwater Service Charges Constitute a Lien. The Stormwater Service Charges shall constitute a lien upon the Property served on the date a bill is rendered for Stormwater Service, and said lien shall have the same priority as taxes levied for state and county purposes. The District may cause a notice of lien for non-payment of such charges to be filed in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds within and for the City of St Louis or St. Louis County, depending upon where such Property served is located. Such notice of lien shall state the amount of the delinquent Stormwater Service Charges, and shall adequately describe the Property against which such lien is asserted. A copy of such notice of lien shall be mailed to the Owner of the Property at the last address on file with the 328 District and the filing of such notice in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds may be deferred as a matter of grace for not more than thirty (30) days from the mailing date. All Stormwater Service Charges that remain unpaid shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed the lower of nine percent (9%) per annum or the maximum legal rate from the time a notice of lien is filed with the appropriate recorder of deeds as herein prescribed, until such time as the account is closed. After such notice of lien is filed of record, the fees of the Recorder for filing and releasing said lien shall also be payable to the District as a prerequisite to releasing said lien, Section Thirteen. Termination of Service for Nonpayment. When any Stormwater Service Charge has not been paid and has been delinquent for a period in excess of three months, the District is authorized to order the water supply to be shut off for the Property for which the Stormwater Service Charge is delinquent or to remove or close any sewer connections, or both, until payment of the delinquent charge together with the reasonable costs involved in shutting off and turning on the water, or closing and reopening the sewer connection, as the case may be, have been paid. When any Stormwater Service Charge has not been paid and has been delinquent for more than fifteen days after the due date, then the District may refuse to issue to the Owner and/or User a permit to connect any other Property owned or controlled by said Owner and/or User to the Wastewater System or Stormwater System; or may refuse to review any plans submitted by or on behalf of such Owner and/or User, or issue any permits requested by or on behalf of such Owner and/or User, or refuse to act on any easement vacation request by or on behalf of such Owner and/or User; or refuse to contract for any purpose with or accept Wastewater or Stormwater from any such Owner and/or User. Section Fourteen. Remedies. Whenever any charge is unpaid after ninety days from the date the bill for such charges was rendered, then the amount overdue may be collected by any or all of three procedures: (A) by assignment to a collection agency; or (B) by suit or other proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction; or (C) by enforcement of the lien provided herein. The District shall have the power to sue any Owner and/or User, jointly and severally, in a civil action to recover delinquent charges plus the late payment charge and interest on the delinquent bill, plus all costs incurred by the District in connection with the filing and enforcement of such lien and the prosecution and collection of such charges including court costs, fees for transcript judyients, special process servers, credit reports, video reports, sewer and/or water shutoff costs, other related fees, and reasonable attomeis fees to be fixed by the court. Section Fifteen. False Information. It shall be unlawful for any Person to furnish any false report or information to the District which would tend to reduce Stormwater Service Charges imposed by the District. Section Sixteen. Violation of Ordinance. Any Person violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not less than $50.00 nor more than $500.00, and each day's violation shall constitute a separate offense. The imposition of such penalty shall in no way restrict or deprive the District of its right to pursue any other remedy it may have for the collection of any delinquent bill for Stormwater Service Charges. 329 Section Seventeen. Stormwater Service Marge Review. The Board shall regularly review the Stormwater Service needs of the District and Stormwater Service Charges, usually as part of a Rate Proposal from the Rate Commission, to assure the appropriateness of the Stormwater Service Charges. Section Eighteen. Notice of Rates. All Owners of Property served by the Stormwater System shall be notified at the time of a rate increase as to the rate schedule in effect. Section Nineteen. Application of Revenues. All revenues billed and collected from Stormwater Service Charges shall be segregated, credited and deposited into a Stormwater Revenue Fund established and maintained by the Director of Finance of the District, and shall be used solely to pay for the costs of providing Stormwater Service. Section Twenty. Appeals. Any Person who considers the Stormwater Service Charges billed to such Person pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance to be illegal, inaccurate or erroneous may request a review thereof by the Director of Finance or his designate. The results of any appeal shall be applied starting on the date of receipt of the appeal by the District. The determination of the Director may be appealed by such Person to the Executive Director; by written notice of appeal filed with the Director of Finance within thirty (30) days of his determination. The determination by the Executive Director shall be considered a final order of the District. Section Twenty -One. Judicial Review. Any Person or Persons jointly or severally aggrieved by any final order of the Executive Director of the District may seek judicial review of such decision pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 12.110 of the District's Plan. Section Twenty -Two. Adjustment Review Committee. A committee, to be known as the Adjustment Review Committee (ARC), is hereby established and shall meet, at minimum, once a month to conduct its business. The ARC shall be comprised of the voting members which are the District's Director of Finance, Assistant Director of Finance, the Secretary -Treasurer, and General Counsel. Non -voting members are the Accounts Receivable Manager and Audit Administrator. On a monthly basis, the ARC shall review and properly record in the minutes all prior monthly billing adjustments as approved and presented by the Accounts .Receivable Manager. These billing adjustments may result from but are not limited to; misapplied payment, transfer of balance due to bankruptcy notice, new occupant, bank encoding error, or water back-up. All write-offs or settlements of accounts shall require a majority of the ARC voting members to meet and discuss before approval. No write-off or settlement in excess of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) and less than Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) shall be effective unless reviewed and approved by three (3) out of the four (4) voting members of the ARC. Any write-off or settlement greater than Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) shall require Finance Committee approval or ratification. The suspension of these rules may occur when a time constraint exists and a decision must be made before the next scheduled meeting, or a situation exists from, but not limited to; foreclosure, sheriff or county tax sale, land Reutilization Authority, Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority, or discharged bankruptcy. In these instances, no settlements or write-offs in excess of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) shall be effective unless reviewed and approved by three (3) out of four (4) voting members of the ARC on an individual basis or at a special meeting as requested by any of the ARC members. All such instances will be reported at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the ARC and recorded in the minutes. ARC activity will be reported to the Board's Finance Committee on a monthly basis. 330 The committee shall perform any other such duties relating to billing and collection policies. Such duties shall be reported to the Executive Director and Board of Trustees. Section Twenty -Three. Severability. The Board hereby declares that if any section, part, sentence or clause of this Ordinance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance, the Board hereby declaring that it would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance without regard to that part hereof that may be held invalid. Section Twenty -Four. Emergency Clause. The services as provided for herein are essential to the operation of the District, and enacted without delay, thus creating an emergency within the meaning of the Chatter. Accordingly, this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its enactment. The foregoing Ordinance was adopted August 12, 2010. 331 APPENDIX I THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT STATEMENT OF POLICY FOR MAINTENANCE OF STORMWATER SEWER SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES The following summarizes the District's current policy on Stormwater System Maintenance. A. Unimproved Channels The District will remove debris, trees, brush, and weeds that significantly obstruct the flow in the channels. Priority will he given to blockages that are in evidence and/or reported causing major flooding. B. Improved Channels The District will remove debris, trees, brush, silt, and weeds that significantly obstruct the flow in the channel. The structural integrity of the channel bottoms and sides shall be maintained. C. Storm Sewers (Enclosed Systems) The District will clean and maintain all public storm sewers (enclosed systems) that have been dedicated to and accepted by the District for operation and maintenance. D. Road Culverts and Bridges The District will not maintain road culverts and/or bridges. This responsibility belongs to the agency or individual that has jurisdiction over the roadway. The District will maintain a road culvert which was installed by the District as an integral part of the storm sewer system. E. Driveway Culverts The District will not maintain any driveway culverts. F. Missouri State Highway Department The District will not maintain any storm sewers located on State Highway right-of-way, unless they are an integral part of an accepted storm system. 332 G. Road Inlets The District does maintain road inlets on systems dedicated and accepted by the District. H. Trench Drains The District does not maintain trench drains. I. Roadside Ditches or Gutters The District will not maintain roadside ditches or gutters. This responsibility belongs to the agency or individual that has jurisdiction over the roadway. J. Bars Over Inlets The District does not allow bars, grating, screens, or any other obstructions to flow to be placed in front of inlets or pipe openings. K. Weeds The District only cuts weeds on property owned by the District. The District does not cut weeds on easements. L. Swales Yard swales will not be maintained by the District. M. Fences The District will maintain fences along improved stormwater channels that were installed in the concrete sides of the channel or installed by the District as an integral part of an improvement. N. Retention and Detention Basins The District does not maintain retention or detention basins. O. Sink Holes The District shall not maintain sink holes, but will maintain the structures over the sink hole if it is a public system. In the event a dispute arises as to whether a particular stormwater sewer system or facility or any part thereof should be maintained, repaired, or replaced by the District pursuant to this policy, the decision of the Executive Director shall be final. Any person or persons jointly or severally aggrieved by such decision may appeal such decision in the manner provided for in Section 12.110 of the District's plan. 333 APPENDIX II Charge Beginning August 1, 2010 ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN MSD BOUNDARIES (per Month) Single Family and Commercial - Monthly Charge (per account) $0.24 Multi -Family - Monthly Charge (per unit) $0.18 334 Accrual Basis of Accounting: The basis of accounting under which transactions are recognized when they occur, regardless of the timing of ash receipts and disbursements. Actual Revenue or Expenditures: The revenue and expenditures incurred in previous fiscal years. Ad Valorem Tax: A tax based on value. Adopted Budget: Refers to the budget amounts as originally approved by the Board of Trustees at the beginning of the year. Annual Budget: A budget applicable to a single fiscal year. Annual Budget Process: The annual budget process consists of activities that encompass the development, implementation, and evaluation of a plan for the provision of services and capital assets for the upcoming fiscal year. This process is strategic in nature, encompassing a multi- year financial and operating plan that allocates resources on the basis of identified goals. Appropriation: The legal authorization granted by the Board of Trustees to make expenditures and to incur obligations for purposes specified in the Budget. Assessed Valuation: A value set on real estate or other properly as a basis for levying taxes within the boundaries of MSD service areas. The assessed valuation is set by the City and County Assessor, who are charged with determining the taxable value of property according to a formula set by the State of Missouri. Asset: Resources owned or held which have monetary value. Balanced Scorecard Measures: A measure of the level of activity and service in the functional areas of the various departments. Base Budget: The same level of funding as in the current year adopted budget with adjustments for one-time costs, merit, benefit and cost of living increases and general price adjustments. Basis of Accounting: A term referring to when revenues, expenditures, and transfers and the related assets and liabilities are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Beginning Fund Balance: Fund balance available in a fund from the end of the prior year, for use in the following year. Billing and Collection Charge: Monthly charge imposed by the District to recover the wastewater program's share of the costs associated with issuing and collecting combined wastewater and stormwater bills. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD): The quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter in five days as determined by Standard Methods and expressed in milligrams per liter. Blockage: Partial or complete interruption of flow as a result of some obstruction in a sewer. Also referred to as a stoppage. Board: Refers to the Board of Trustees of the District. The Board is comprised of six members, three of whom are appointed by the Mayor of the City of St Louis and the remaining three are appointed by the County Executive of St Louis County. Bond Rating: The rating of bonds as a statement of a locality's economic, financial and managerial condition. It represents the business community's assessment of the investment quality of a local government Highly rated bonds attract more competition in the marketplace, thereby lowering interest costs paid by MSD and its ratepayers. Bonds: A written promise to pay a specified sum of money at a specified date in the future together with periodic interest at a specified rate. Branch Sewer: A sewer that receives wastewater from a relatively small area and discharges into a main sewer serving more than one branch sewer area. Break: A fracture or opening in a pipe, manhole or other structure due to structural failure andlor structural defect Budget: A balanced financial plan for a given period of time, which includes an appropriation and tax levy ordinance for the various sources of revenue that finance the various funds. Budget Calendar: The schedule for completion of the various phases in the preparation and adoption of the annual budget. Budget Document: The instrument used by the budget -making authority to present a comprehensive financial program to the Board of Trustees and the public. Budget Message: The opening section of the budget which provides a general discussion of the most important aspects of the budget, accomplishments from previous years and new initiatives and challenges faring the District as 335 presented by the Executive Director to the Board of Trustees. Budget Transfers: Budget transfers shift previously budgeted funds from one category of expenditure to another. Budgetary Control: The control or management of a govemment or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget that keeps expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and revenues. Budgeted Position: Those positions which have either been budgeted for and authorized in the past or which are being requested in the current year's budget Business Line: Classification of an account to distinguish between wastewater and stormwater or unallocated expenditures. Bypass: A pipe, valve, gate, weir, trench or other device designed to permit all or part of a wastewater flow to be diverted from usual channels or flow. Sometimes refers to a special line which carries the flow around a facility or device that needs maintenance or repair. CAFR: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Capacity: The maximum rate of flow that can be carried by sewers or received by a treatment plant without causing an upset of the biological material contained in the treatment system. Capital Charge: That portion of the total charges for services provided by the District which is established for debt retirement. Capital Improvement and Replacement Program: A plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet the capital needs to maintain or replace the sewer infrastructure. It sets forth each projects expenditures and specifies the resources estimated to be available to finance the projected expenditures. Capital Improvement Surcharge: A user charge to finance the construction of seven wastewater improvement projects required to comply with federal and state clean water laws. This monthly surcharge was last charged in April 1995 on customer bills for March 1995 service. Capital Outlay: Items purchased utilizing departmental budgeted funds in the 55000 series of natural accounts for the purchase of land, buildings, structural improvements, equipment, vehicles, machinery, fumiture, and computer equipment. Items purchased in this category generally become capital assets of the District Carry over, A quantity left over or held for future use. A sum transferred to a new column, page, book, or business account. Cash Basis of Accounting: Under this basis of accounting, revenues are not recorded until cash is received; expenditures are recorded only when cash is disbursed. Catch Basin: A chamber or well used with storm or combined sewers as a means of removing grit which might otherwise enter and be deposited in sewers. Ccf: Hundred cubic feet, approximately 750 gallons. Channel: An improved (paved) watercourse. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): The quantity of oxygen utilized in the chemical oxidation of organic and inorganic matter as determined by Standard Methods and expressed in milligrams per liter. CIRP: Capital Improvement and Replacement Program. Clean Water Act: Growing public awareness and concern for controlling water pollution led to enactment of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. As amended in 1977, this law became commonly known as the Clean Water Act The Act established the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States. It gave EPA the authority to implement pollution control programs such as setting wastewater standards for industry. The Clean Water Act also continued requirements to set water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters. The Act made it unlawful for any person to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters, unless a permit was obtained under its provisions. It also funded the construction of sewage treatment plants under the construction grants program and recognized the need for planning to address the critical problems posed by nonpoint source pollution. Cleanout: An opening (usually covered or capped) in a wastewater collection system used for inserting tools, rods or snakes while cleaning a pipeline or clearing a stoppage. Collection System: A network of pipes, manholes, cleanouts, traps, siphons, lift stations and other structures used to collect all wastewater and wastewater -carved wastes of an area and transport them to a treatment plant or disposal system. The collection system includes land, wastewater lines and appurtenances, pumping stations and general property. Combined Sewers: A sewerage system that carries both sanitary sewage 336 MGLOSSARY and stormwater runoff. Compliance Charge: Billed to non-residential customers only — the costs related to the District's compliance activities for non- residential properties required to comply with federal and state environmental regulations. Conductor: A pipe which carries a liquid load from one point to another point. In a wastewater collection system, a conductor is often a large pipe with no service connections. Also called a conduit, monitor interceptor or interconnector. Conduit: Any artificial or natural duct, either open or closed, for conveying fluids from one point to another. An electrical conduit conveys electricity. Connection Fees: One-time fees assessed when properties are connected to the sewerage system. Effective November 1,1994, these fees are uniform throughout the District and are based on the size of the property's water tap. Construction funds: Funds established to receive and disburse proceeds from revenue sources restricted for construction of improvements to sewerage and drainage collection systems and treatment facilities. Contamination: Introduction into water of any microorganisms, chemicals, toxic substances, wastes, or wastewater in a concentration that makes the water unfit for its next intended use. Contractual Services: Expenses and encumbrances charged to the 54000 series of natural accounts. Expenses in this category usually involve an agreement with a particular vendor to provide a specific type of work. Contributed Wastewater Volume: The quantity of water -home wastes emanating from residential property or non-residential property and, specifically: 1. For metered residential property, billed metered water usage during the best equated period; 2. For nonresidential property, either billed metered water usage throughout the year with exemption allowances for any water that does not enter the sewer system or measured wastewater volume; and 3. For unmetered residential property, average indoor water usage characteristics of various housing attributes, as defined in the rate study, applied to each user's number of rooms and plumbing fixtures. Conveyance System: A series of sewers, manholes, pumping facilities and force mains which carry wastewater from residences, commercial establishments, public buildings, institutions and industrial plants. It terminates at a treatment plant. Cost Center: An organization that performs a particular function and separately accounts for expenditures. Cross Connection: A connection between a storm drain system and a sanitary collection system. Less frequently used term to describe a connection between two sections of a collection system to handle anticipated overloads of one system. C.S.O.: Combined Sewer Overflows — discharges from a combined sewer in excess of the interceptor or regulator capacity, that are discharged into a receiving stream rather than gang to a treatment plant. Curb Inlet: A chamber or well built at the outline of a street to admit gutter flow to the storm water drainage system. Debt: An obligation resulting from the borrowing of money or from the purchase of goods and services. Debt Service Funds: Funds to provide for the receipt and disbursement of monies designated for payment of interest and redemption of outstanding bond issues. Defeasance: The process of discharging the lien of an ordinance, resolution, or indenture relating to a bond issue and, in the process, rendering inoperative restrictions under which the issuer has been obliged to operate. Ordinarily an issuer may defease an indenture requirement by depositing with a trustee an amount sufficient to fully pay all amounts under a bond contract as they become due. Deliverables: A list of specifically promised reports, studies and other items produced under the provision of a contract for professional services. Department: The Deparbnent is the primary unit in the District. Each unit is managed by a Department Director. Departments are generally composed of divisions which share a common purpose or which perform similar duties. Depreciation: The loss in service value, not restored by current maintenance, which occurs in utility plants in service due to decay, inadequacy and obsolescence. Depreciation accounting is usually based on an annual percentage allowance of plant investment equal to the original investment spread over the useful life of the facility. Detention: The delay or holding of the flow of water and water - carried wastes in a pipe system. This can be caused by a restriction in the pipe, a stoppage or a dip. 337 Detention also means the time water is held or stored in a basin or a wet well. Sometimes called retention. Discharge Permits: Permit granted by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (DNR) allowing the discharge of effluent into a body of water. The point source must conform to specific water quality standards established for the receiving waters. District: Refers to The Metropolitan St Louis Sewer District or MSD. The District is organized pursuant to Article VI, Section 30 of the Missouri State Constitution that empowers the people in the City of St. Louis and St. Louis County °to establish a metropolitan district for functional administration of services common to the area". DNR: Department of Natural Resources, a Missouri state govemmental agency responsible for the administration and enforcement of state water pollution control polides and laws. The DNR provides state grant funds to local communities for wastewater treatment and administers the EPA Construction Grants Program on behalf of the federal agency. Drainage Facility: Any system of artificially constructed drains, inducting open channels and separate stormwater sewers used to convey stormwater surface water or groundwater, either continuously or intermittently to natural watercourses. Dry Weather Overflows: Discharges from a sanitary system in dry weather into a receiving stream rather than a treatment plant, usually as a result of a blockage or capacity limitation. Easement: Legal right to use the property of others for a specific purpose. Effluent: Wastewater or other liquid — raw (untreated), partially or completely treated — flowing FROM a reservoir, basin, treatment process, or treatment plant. Encumbrances: Obligations incurred in the form of orders, contracts and similar items that will become payable when goods are delivered or services rendered. Engineering Plan Review Fees: Fees assessed to developers to defray the District's costs of the engineering reviews that ensure standards compliance before construction permits are issued. EPA: Environmental Protection Agency, a federal agency that is responsible for the administration and enforcement of national water pollution control polides and laws. The EPA provides federal grant funds to local governments for wastewater treatment under the provisions of the EPA Construction Grants Program. Expenditure: An amount of money disbursed or obligated. An expenditure is a decrease in net financial resources. This includes current operating expenses requiring the present or future use of current assets. Fees: A general term used for any charge levied by govemment associated with providing a service. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB): Independent, private, non -governmental authority for the establishment of ACCOUNTING principles in the United States. Fiscal Year: An annual period used for budgeting and reporting purposes. Far the District, this period is from July 1 through June 30, Flood Protection Facilities: A facility that affects the flood conveyance capacity or flood management behavior of the System, usually designed to reduce flooding hazards. Flow: The volume of effluent expected to enter a treatment system over a given time period. Treatment systems are designed based upon estimates of peak and average flow for different segments of the system. FTE: Full -Time Equivalent positions. Fund: A fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts recording ash and other finandal resources, together with all related liabilities and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulation, restriction, or limitations. Fund Balance: The equity of a fund. The excess of the assets of a fund over its liabilities, reserves and carry-over. Fund Group: A category of various funds logically grouped on the basis of the purpose of each fund. At the present time, the District has the following fund groups: 1. General Fund 2. Revenue Funds 3.Operation, Maintenance and Construction Improvement (OMCI) Funds 4. Construction Funds 5. Debt Service Funds 6. Special Funds Note: Descriptions of each fund group are included in that group's section of the Budget. 338 Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP): Uniform minimum standards and guidelines for financial accounting and reporting. They govem the form and content of the financial statements of an entity. GAAP encompass the practice at a particular time; they include not only broad guidelines of general application, but also detailed practices and procedures. GAAP provide a standard by which to measure financial presentations. The primary authoritative body on the application of GAAP to state and local govemments is the GASB. GASB: Governmental Accounting Standards Board. General Fund: A fund established by administrative action to finance the ordinary operations of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District The General Fund may be used for any legally authorized purpose of the District. It is used to account for all revenues and activities of District not provided for in any other fund. It may receive any and all revenues not specifically designated for other funds. All wastewater and stormwater user charges receivable, less allowances for uncollectible accounts, are recorded in the General Fund. General Obligation Bonds: Are used to finance Capital Improvement Projects that result in community wide benefits. These bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the issuer and can only be issued by govemmental units with taxing authority. Issuance of General Obligation Bonds requires 67% approval of those voting. GFOA: Govemment Finance Officers Association. Goal: General statements of public policy purpose and intent. Grant: A contribution of assets by one govemmental unit to another unit. The contribution is usually made to aid in the support of a specified function, such as sewer construction, pollution control, etc. Impervious Area: Areas of the land surface that by man's action become blocked or sealed from rainfall causing runoff in excess of the natural rain water runoff of undisturbed land. Examples are parking lots and rooftops. Impervious Charge: A system for assessing fees for stomvater runoff conveyances and controls, and the operation and maintenance of same based upon the amount of impervious area of the rate payer's property. In -House Contracts: Planning, design and engineering services provided by existing District staff in order to accomplish specific capital projects. Infiltration The seepage of groundwater into a sewer system, including service connections. Seepage frequently occurs through defective or cracked pipes, pipe joints, connections or manhole walls. Infiltrationfldow Infiltration/Inflow. The total quantity of water from both infiltration and inflow without distinguishing the source. Inflow: Water discharged into a sewer system and service connections from such sources as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellars, yard and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs and swampy arras, around manhole covers or through holes in the covers, cross connections from storm and combined sewer systems, catch basins, storm waters, surface runoff, street wash waters or drainage. Inflow differs from infiltration in that it is a direct discharge into the sewer rather than a leak in the sewer itself. Influent: Wastewater or other liquid — raw (untreated) or partially treated — flowing into a reservoir, basin, treatment process or treatment plant. Inlet: A surface connection to a drain pipe. A chamber for collecting storm water with no well below the outlet pipe for collecting grit Often connected to a catch basin or a "basin manhole' (cleanout manhole") with a grit chamber. Intercepting Sewer: A sewer that receives flow from a number of other large sewers or outlets and conducts the waters to a point for treatment or disposal. Often called an °interceptor°. Interconnector: A sewer installed to connect two separate sewers. If one sewer becomes blocked, wastewater can back up and flow through the interconnectorto the other sewer. Lagoon: A shallow body of water containing partially treated sewerage in which aerobic stabilization occurs. Lateral Sewer, That portion of the sewer lying within a public street or easement connecting a building sewer service to the main sewer. Levy: The total amount of taxes, special assessments or service charges imposed by a govemment. Liabilities: Obligations incurred in past or current transactions requiring present or future settlement. Lift Station: A wastewater pumping station that lifts the wastewater to a higher elevation when continuing the sewer at reasonable slopes would involve excessive depths of SARY 339 trench. Also, an installation of pumps that raise wastewater from areas too low to drain into available sewers. Low Income Assistance Credit: A Low Income Assistance Credit is available to eligible low income customers of the District who are billed for and pay a wastewater user charge, capital improvement surcharge and/or are billed for and pay stormwater user charge. The amount of such Low Income Assistance Credit will be fifty percent (50%) of the wastewater user charge, capital improvement surcharge and/or stormwater user charge billed to such customer for the applicable billing period and will be shown as a credit on bills of eligible low income customers which are issued on or after July 1,1993. The Low Income Assistance Credit for the capital improvement surcharge portion will be absorbed by the wastewater user charge. Main Sewer: A sewer line that receives wastewater from many tributary branches and sewer lines and serves as an outlet for a large territory or is used to feed an intercepting sewer. Management Position: Any District position which is filled by an administrative, • supervisory or professional employee and certain positions which are nonbargaining due to the nature of the duties performed. Manhole: An opening in a sewer provided for the purpose of permitting operators or equipment to enter or leave a sewer. Sometimes called an "access hole°, or "maintenance hole". Metered Multi -Unit ResidentiaUNon•Residential Property: All property connected to an approved water meter which is: (I) Used only for human residency and consists of two or more dwelling units connected to a single approved water meter, or (II) Non-residential property. Metered Property: All property connected to an approved water meter through which the amount of water usage is measured. Metered Single -Unit Residential Property: Property used only for human residency, which consists of a single dwelling unit which is connected to an approved water meter which serves only such unit Mission Statement: A brief description of the purpose and functions of an agency. Multi -Unit Residence: Residential propertyMich consists of a dwelling under one roof for occupancy by more than one family, including but not limited to, flats, apatments, condominiums, and the like. MANBE: Minority and Woman -owned Business Enterprises. A program to encourage the participation of Minority and Women's business concems in the purchase of professional services and construction work. Natural Account: Detailed classification established to budget and account for the purchase of specific goods and services and the receipt of revenues from specific sources. Natural Account Group: A grouping of accounts based on the category of goods or services purchased; for example: Personnel Services. Non -Point Pollution: Pollution which does not enter the water from any discemible, confined and disaete conveyance (source) but rather wash off, run off or seep from broad areas of land. Non -Residential Property: Property other than Residential Property. Normal Wastewater: Waters or wastes having: (a) A five-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) not greater than 300 milligrams per liter, and (b) Containing not more than 300 milligrams per liter of Suspended Solids (SS); and (c) Having a Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) not greater than 600 milligrams per liter. Objectives: The yearly organizational goals expected to be achieved, listed in order of priorities with their associated costs including estimates of salaries, equipment, supplies, etc. Obligations: Amounts which a govemment may be required legally to meet out of its resources. They include not only actual liabilities, but also encumbrances not yet paid. Obstruction: Any solid object in or protruding into a wastewater flow in a collecfion line that prevents a smooth or even passage of the wastewater. OUR: Operational Maintenance & Repairs. OMCI Funds: Operation, Maintenance and Construction Improvement Funds established to account for proceeds from tax levies in the various subdistricts and grants in aid of construction. Expenditures are primarily for stormwater and sanitary sewer improvements. Ordinance: A bill, resolution or order by means of which appropriations are given legal effect. It is the method by which the appropriation of the annual budget is enacted into law by the Board of Trustees. 340 O.R.S.: The Overflow Regulation System of the District. The District's O.R.S. is focused on the facilities that evolved from the former direct discharges of sewage from trunk sewers into the Mississippi River. The system now includes the management, operation, maintenance and improvements to the integrated trunk sewer outfalls, riverfront interceptors, interceptor pump stations and flood protection facilities. The goal of the O.R.S. is to capture the maximum amount of sewage and wastewaters and convey these to wastewater treatment plants at Bissell Point and Lemay. Outfalls: The point, location or structure where wastewater or drainage discharges from a sewer, drain, or other conduit The conduit leading to the final disposal point or area. Outfall Sewer: A sewer that receives wastewater from a collection system or from a wastewater treatment plant and carries it to a point of ultimate or final discharge in the environment Outlet: Downstream opening or discharge end of a pipe, culvert, or canal. Permittee: An industrial user required to maintain an industrial waste permit due to the quality or quantity of their wastewater or point of discharge. Personnel Services: Expenditures and encumbrances charged to the51000 series of natural accounts. This category of expenses incudes items such as salaries, overtime and benefits. Point SourcelPoint of Discharge: Any discemible, confined, and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to, any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, vessel, or other floating craft from which pollutants are or may be discharged. Pollutant: Any substance which, alone or in combination with other substances, if discharged to waters of the State in sufficient quantities, causes or is reasonably certain to cause any alteration of the physical, chemical or biological properties of such waters; or to create a nuisance; or to render such waters harmful, detrimental or injurious to public health, safety or welfare, or to domestic, industrial, agricultural, recreational, or other legitimate beneficial uses or to any organism, aquatic life, plant or animal. ppm: Refers to °parts per million". Commonly used to report the results of laboratory analyses of wastewater samples. Preventive Maintenance: Regularly scheduled servicing of machinery or other equipment using appropriate tools, tests and lubricants. This type of maintenance can prolong the useful fife of equipment and machinery and increase its efficiency by detecting and correcting problems before they cause a breakdown of the equipment. Professional Services: Expenditures for services rendered to the District under formal contract by "professionals" who have a high degree of skill and training in technical fields. Examples are: auditors, management consultants, lawyers, engineers, etc. Property: An improved lot or parcel of real property, whether public or private, which is served by the System. Property Tax: An annual tax on the values of certain types of personal or business wealth, represented by real or personal property. Property Tax Rate: The amount of tax stated in terms of a unit of the tax base expressed as dollars per $100 of assessed valuation. Proposed Budget: The recommended budget submitted by the District to the Board of Trustees. Pump Station: Installation of pumps to lift wastewater to a higher elevation in places where flat land would require excessively deep sewer trenches. Also used to raise wastewater from areas too low to drain into available collection lines, These stations may be equipped with air -operated ejectors or centrifugal pumps. Raw Sewage: Plant influent or wastewater before any treatment Regulator: A device used in combined sewers to control or regulate the diversion of flow. Represented Position (Bargaining Unit): Any District position, which is filled by an employee represented by a labor union. Reserves: Funds set aside for a specific purpose or use. Residential Property: Property used only for human residency. Resolution: Resolutions are used to express opinions about a particular item of business. Unlike ordinances, resolutions are not laws and are not proposed to the MSD Board of Trustees prior to adoption. Resolutions are often used to honor public officials, recognize retiring employees for their years of service and acknowledge strategic business plans. 341 Resources: The actual assets of a govemmental unit, such as cash, grants receivable, land, buildings, etc. including estimated revenues applied to the current fiscal year, and bonds authorized and unissued. Retention: That part of the precipitation falling on a drainage area which does not escape as surface stream flow during a given period. It is the difference between total precipitation and total runoff during the period, and represents evaporation, transpiration, subsurface leakage, infiltration, and, when short periods are considered, temporary surface or underground storage on the area. The delay or holding of the flow of water and water -carried wastes in a pipe system. This can be due to a restriction in the pipe, a stoppage or a dip. Also, the time water is held or stored in a basin or wet well. This is also called detention. Revenue: Income generated by user charges, taxes, investment income, land rental, connection fees, as well as Federal, State and local grants. Revenue Bonds: Debt used to finance Capital Improvement Projects serviced from the net revenues from a particular enterprise, such as sewer service. Issuance of Revenue Bonds requires 57% approval of those voting. Revenue Funds: Funds established to account for proceeds from user charges and connection and other fees within the subdistricts to provide for operations and maintenance within the user charge revenue subdistrict& Sanitary Sewer System: The sewer system that caries liquid and wastewater from residences, commercial buildings, industrial plants and institutions, together with minor quantities of ground, storm and surface waters that are not admitted intentionally. Sanitary Wet Weather Bypasses: Overflows of sanitary sewage, mixed with stormwater, to a stream, from the separate sanitary sewer system in times of wet weather due to the entry of extraneous water into the System. This occurs when the sewers become hydraulically overloaded. By-passes are usually "designed', and are used to prevent back-ups into basements. Secondary Waste Treatment: A wastewater treatment process used to convert dissolved or suspended materials into a form more readily separated from the water being treated. Usually the process follows primary treatment by sedimentation. The process commonly is a type of biological treatment process followed by secondary clarifiers that allow the solids to settle out from the water being treated. Separate Sewers: Sewers that carry only sanitary sewage or stormwater runoff. The separate sanitary sewers are ultimately connected to a treatment plant Separate storm sewers discharge to streams. Served: Property with an active sewer connection, either directs/ or indirectly, to a sanitary or drainage facility owned or operated by the District and lying within the District, or to property which otherwise discharges wastewater directly or indirectly into such facilities, or if the discharges of such substances therefrom ultimately enter said facilities. Service Area: Bonfils Watershed, Coldwater Creek Subdistrict, Fee Fee Trunk Sewer Subdistrict, Fenton Service Area, Forest Ridge Service Area, Ellisville Service Area, Mississippi River Subdistrict Missouri Bottoms Service Area, Riverside Service Area, South County Service Area, Spanish Lake Watershed, Subdistrict No. 150 (Sugar Creek), Terri -Robyn Service Area, Twin Oaks Service Area, and Valley Sewage Company Service Area, St. Louis County Sewer Area, Martigney Sewer Area, and Valley Park Sewer Area, and any property served by the System, Service Charge: All charges imposed for services of the District. Sewage: The used water and water -carved solids from homes that flow in sewers to a wastewater treatment plant. The preferred term is wastewater. Sewer: A pipe or conduit that carries wastewater or drainage water. The term `collection line' is often used also. Sewer Main: A sewer pipe to which building laterals are connected. Also called a collection main. Sewerage: A comprehensive term that includes facilities collecting, pumping, treating and disposing of wastewater. Single Unit: Residential Property used as a dwelling by one family only. Sludge: The solids removed from sewage during wastewater treatment. Sludge Management: The purposeful, systematic control of the generation, storage, collection, transport, processing and disposal of sludges. Special Funds: Special funds of the District are comprised of the following: 1. Improvement Fund 2. Water Backup Fund 3. Wastewater Emergency Fund 4. Stormwater Emergency Fund 342 Standard Methods: The latest edition of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" as published jointly by The American Public Health Association, The American Water Works Association, and The Water Pollution Control Federation. Storm Sewer: A separate pipe, conduit or open channel (sewer) that carries runoff from storms, surface drainage and street wash, but does not include domestic and industrial wastes. Storm sewers are often the redpients of hazardous or toxic substances due to the illegal dumping of hazardous wastes or spills created by accidents involving vehicles and trains transporting these substances. Also see sanitary sewer system. Stormwater Any water resulting from precipitation that may or may not be mixed with an accumulation of dirt, soil, and other debris or substances collected from the surface on whidr such precipitation falls or flows. Stormwater Runoff: The portion of rainfall, melted snow or irrigation water that flows across ground surfaces and eventually is retumed to streams. Runoff can pick up pollutants from the air or land and carry them to the receiving waters. Stormwater Service Area: Any area where stormwater fadlities have been dedicated to the District and the District has accepted dedication of said facilities or the District has adopted a resolution accepting the responsibility for operation and maintenance of stormwater facilities. Stormwater Service Charge: The user charge to generate the revenue to operate and maintain the stormwater system. Subdistrict: Under or beneath the District, subdivision of the District. Supplemental Appropriation: Where sufficient justification exists, supplemental appropriations by the Board may occur outside of the annual budget process. Such appropriations shall reflect unantidpated emergency requirements subject to serious time constraints that a normal resource allocation mechanism, such as the annual budget process, cannot accommodate. Surcharge: The additional charge for the treatment of wastes containing suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand or chemical oxygen demand exceeding normal wastewater strengths. Suspended Solids: Solids that either float on the surface of, or are suspended in water, wastewater, or other liquids; as determined by analysis for nonfilterable milligrams per liter. System: The entire sewer and drainage system owned and operated by the District for the collection, storage, handling, and treatment of wastewater, for the collection, storage, handling and treatment of stormwater, and combined sewers for the collection, storage, treatment and handling of wastewater and stormwater to serve the needs of the District and its inhabitants and others, including all appurtenances and facilities connected therewith or relating thereto, together with all extensions, improvements, additions and enlargements thereto hereafter made or acquired by the District. Tax Levy: The total amount of taxes imposed by a government. Taxes: Mandatory charge levied by a governmental unit for the purpose of financing services performed for the common benefit. Toxic Pollutants: Any substance whether gaseous, liquid or solid which, when discharged to a wastewater system watercourse in sufficient quantities, interferes with or passes through any wastewater treatment process, or constitutes a hazard to human beings, animal fife, plant life, or inhibits aquatic life. Treatment Plant: An arrangement of pipes, equipment, devices, tanks and structures for treating wastewater and industrial wastes. A water pollution control plant. Trunk Sewer: A sewer that receives wastewater from many tributary branches or sewers and serves a large territory and contributing population. Also see main sewer. Unmetered Residential Property: Property used only for human residency, which is not Metered Residential Property. Useful Life: The expected period of time during which a depredating asset will be productive. User: The occupant, or owner of the Property, the person holding a permit for water service to the property, or any person served by the system. User Charge: The major charges established by the District; Wastewater User Charge and Stormwater Service Charge. Utilities: Expense incurred for gas, electric, phone and water at all District locations. Volume Charge: Wastewater charge applied to each customer's Contributed Wastewater Volume. It includes both OM&R and capital costs components. 343 Waste Activated Sludge: Sludge that has been aerated and subjected to bacterial action, used to remove organic matter in raw sewage during secondary waste treatment. Waste Permit: Permit issued to allow, with certain conditions, waste discharge into the System. This includes discharge of hauled waste. Wastewater: The water -home wastes emanating from Residential Property or Non-residential Property, together with such groundwater, surface water, or stormwater as cannot be avoided. Wastewater User Charge: The costs related to the amount of wastewater discharged to the sanitary sewer system. Measured in hundred cubic feet (Ccfs) for customers with water meters and the number of rooms and indoor plumbing fixtures for customers without water meters. Water Backup Program: The District will review the total cost to a homeowner of repairs necessary after a sewer backup, provided the problem is found in a part of the sewer line maintained by MSD. Insurance coverage has been obtained to limit the District's total expense. Water Meter Loan: An interest -free loan made by the District to the owner of a residential property not served by a water meter. The loan may be for an amount up to $300 and will be repaid over a period not to exceed 20 years. This program was discontinued in 2004; existing loans continue to be included in monthly billing. Water Quality: The suitability of water for given uses as measured by the levels of pollutants it contains. Water use classification includes: public water supply; recreation; propagation of fish and other aquatic life, agricultural use and industrial use. Watercourse: A natural or artificial channel for the passage of water, either continuously or intermittently. Watershed: A region or area bounded peripherally by water parting and draining ultimately to a particular watercourse or body of water. Working Capital: Cash, materials and supplies, and other similar current assets necessary in the operation of the facility. 344