Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutExhibit MSD 84L3 - Grand Glaize Wastewater Treatment FacilityExhibit MSD 84L3 Page 2 of 13 Permit No. MO-0101362 FACILITY DESCRIPTION (continued) Outfall 4001 — POTW — SIC #4952 Lift station/primary clarification/activated sludge/chlorination/dechlorination/gravity sludge thickening & belt filter press/sludge is hauled to other MSD facilities, landfilled, land applied, or composted. Design population equivalent is 210,000. Design flow is 21 MGD. Actual flow is 17 MGD. Design sludge production is 5840 dry tons/year. Legal Description: NW'/,, SW %,, SW'/,, Sec. 16, T44N, R5E, St. Louis County Latitude/Longitude: 3 832571/-09028159 Receiving Stream: Meramec River (P) First Classified Stream and ID: Meramec River (P) (02183) USGS Basin & Sub -watershed No.: (07140102-080003) Outfall #002 — POTW — SIC #4952 Three cell lagoon/wet weather flow retention/flow equalization/sludge is retained in lagoon. Discharged flow enters main outfall 4001 pipe. Legal Description: NW'/,, SW %, SW'/,, Sec. 16, T44N, R5E, St. Louis County Latitude/Longitude: 3833341/-09028284 Receiving Stream: Meramec River (P) First Classified Stream and ID: Meramec River (P) (02183) USGS Basin & Sub -watershed No.: (07140102-080003) Outfall #003 - POTW - SIC #4952 Stormwater runoff/no treatment. Legal Description: SE %, SE'h, SE'/,, Sec. 8, T44N, R5E, St. Louis County Latitude/Longitude: 3 8 33413/-09028270 Receiving Stream: Unnamed Tributary to Grand Glaize Creek (U) First Classified Stream and ID: Grand Glaize Creek (P) (02184) USGS Basin & Sub -watershed No.: (07I40102-080003) Outfall #004 - POTW - SIC #4952 Stormwater runoff/no treatment. Legal Description: SE %, SE '/, SE '/,, Sec. 8, T44N, R5E, St. Louis County Latitude/Longitude: 3833420/-09028245 Receiving Stream: Unnamed Tributary to Grand Glaize Creek (U) First Classified Stream and ID: Grand Glaize Creek (P) (02184) USGS Basin & Sub -watershed No.: (07140102-080003) Outfall #005 - POTW - SIC #4952 Stormwater runoff/no treatment. Legal Description: SW'/<, SW'/,, SW %, Sec. 9, T44N, R5E, St. Louis County Latitude/Longitude: 3 83 3441 /-09028447 Receiving Stream: Unnamed Tributary to Grand Glaize Creek (U) First Classified Stream and ID: Grand Glaize Creek (P) (02184) USGS Basin & Sub -watershed No.: (07140102-080003) Outfall #006 - POTW - SIC #4952 Stormwater runoff/no treatment. Legal Description: SW '/, SW '/<, SW '/,, Sec. 9, T44N, R5E, St. Louis County Latitude/Longitude: 3833451 /-09028162 Receiving Stream: Unnamed Tributary to Grand Glaize Creek (U) First Classified Stream and ID: Grand Glaize Creek (P) (02184) USGS Basin & Sub -watershed No.: (07140102-080003) PAGE NUMBER 3 of 13 A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS PERMIT NUMBER MO-0I01362 The permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) with serial number(s) as specified in the application for this permit. The final effluent limitations shall become effective upon issuance and remain in effect until expiration of the permit. Such discharges shall be controlled, limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: OUTFACE NUMBER AND EFFLUENT FINAL EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS PARAMETER(S) UNITS DAILY MAXIMUM WEEKLY AVERAGE MONTHLY AVERAGE MEASUREMENT SAMPLE FREQUENCY TYPE Outfall #001 Flow Temperature Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demands Total Suspended Solids pH — Units Fecal Coliform (note 1) Chlorine, Total Residual (note 2) Ammonia Nitrogen, Total Oil & Grease MGD °C mg/L mg/L SU #/100 ml mg/L mg/L mg/L * * *** 1000 .024 (.13 ML) 12.6 15 40 45 * * 25 30 *** 400 .012 (.13 ML) 6.3 10 once/day 24 hr. total once/weekday** grab once/weekday** 24 hr. comp. once/weekday** 24 hr. comp. once/weekday** grab twice/week grab twice/week grab twice/week grab once/week grab MONITORING REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED MONTHLY; THE FIRST REPORT IS DUE April 28, 2009 . Outfall #001 Cadmium, Total Recoverable Chromium, Total Recoverable Copper, Total Recoverable Lead, Total Recoverable Mercury, Total Recoverable Nickel, Total Recoverable Zinc, Total Recoverable µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg1L µg/L µg/L 2.2 * * 22.1 1.2 * * 0.9 * * 8.8 .8 * * once/quarter**** grab once/quarter**** grab once/quarter**** grab once/quarter**** grab oncelquarter**** grab once/quarter**** grab once/quarter**** grab MONITORING REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED OUARTERLY; THE FIRST REPORT IS DUE April 28, 2009 . Outfall #001 See Special Condition #17 * twice/year 24 hour in March composite and September once/year in July grab Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Test (AEC 79.5%) Total Toxic Organics (note 3) % Survival mg/L MONITORING REPORTS SHALL BE SUBM IED ANNUALLY ; THE FIRST REPORT IS DUE October 28, 2009 . THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE AMOUNTS, B. STANDARD CONDITIONS IN ADDITION TO SPECIFIED CONDITIONS STATED HEREIN, THIS PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED Parts I. II & III STANDARD CONDITIONS DATED October 1, 1980 and August 15, 1994, AND HEREBY INCORPORATED AS THOUGH FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN. A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS PAGE NUMBER 4 of 13 1 PERMIT NUMBER MO-0101362 The permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) with serial number(s) as specified in the application for this permit. The final effluent limitations shall become effective upon issuance and remain in effect until expiration of the permit. Such discharges shall be controlled, limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: OUTFALL NUMBER AND EFFLUENT PARAMETER(S) UNITS FINAL EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS i MONITORING REQUIREMENTS DAILY MAXIMUM WEEKLY AVERAGE MONTHLY AVERAGE MEASUREMENT SAMPLE FREQUENCY TYPE Outfall #002 MGD mg/L mg/L SU #/1 00mL mg/L °C MGD inches mg/L mL/L/hr SU mg/L #/100 mL * *** * * * * * * 1.5 *** 15 * 45 45 * *** * * * * * * 1.0 *** 10 * once/discharge/day 24 hr. estimate once/discharge/day grab once/discharge/day grab once/discharge/day grab once/discharge/day grab once/discharge/day grab once/discharge/day grab once/quarter**** instantaneous estimate once/quarter**** total once/quarter**** grab once/quarter**** grab once/quarter**** grab once/quarter**** grab once/quarter**** grab now Biochemical Oxygen Demands Total Suspended Solids pH — Units Fecal Coliform (note 1) Ammonia Nitrogen, Total Temperature Outfalls #003 through #006 (Stormwater) Flow Rainfall Biochemical Oxygen Demands Settleable Solids pH — Units OH & Grease Fecal Coliform (note I) MONITORING REPORTS SHALL BE SUBM DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE TTED OUARTERLY; THE F RST REPORT TRACE AMOUNTS. IS DUE April 28, 2009 . THERE SHALL BE NO FOAM IN OTHER THAN B. STANDARD CONDITIONS IN ADDITION TO SPECIFIED CONDITIONS STATED HEREIN, THIS PERMIT STANDARD CONDITIONS DATED October I. 1980 and August 15, 1994, AND IS SUBJECT TO THE HEREBY INCORPORATED ATTACHED Parts 1, II & III AS THOUGH FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN. MO 760-0010 {NI) A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (continued) * Monitoring requirement only. ** Once each weekday means: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. *** pH is measured in pH units and is not to be averaged. The pH is limited to the range of 6.0-9.0 pH units **** See table below for quarterly sampling. Note 1 — Final limitations and monitoring requirements for Fecal Coliform are applicable only during the recreational season from April 1 through October 31. Page 5 of 13 Permit No. MO-0I01362 A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (continued) Note 2 — This permit contains a Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) limit. (a) This effluent limit is below the minimum quantification level (ML) of the most common and practical EPA approved CLTRC methods. The department has determined the current acceptable ML for total residual chlorine to be 0.13 mg/L when using the DPD Colorimetric Method #4500 — CL G. from Standard Methods for the Examination of Waters and Wastewater. The permittee will conduct analyses in accordance with this method, or equivalcnt, and report actual analytical values. Measured values greater than or equal to the minimum quantification level of 0.13 mg/L will be considered violations of the permit and values less than the minimum quantification level of 0.13 mg/L will be considered to be in compliance with the permit limitation. The minimum quantification level does not authorize the discharge of chlorine in excess of the effluent limits stated in the permit. (b) Disinfection is required year-round unless the permit specifically states that "Final limitations and monitoring requirements for Fecal Coliform are applicable only during the recreational season from April 1 through October 31." If your permit does not require disinfection during the non -recreational months, do not chlorinate in those months. (c) Do not chemically dechlorinate if it is not needed to meet the limits in your permit. (d) If no chlorine was used in a given sampling period, an actual analysis is not necessary. Simply report as "0 mg/L" TRC. Note 3 — See Total Toxic Organics page. Quarterly Monitoring Table Sample discharge at least once for the months of: Report is due: January, February, March (1st Quarter) April, May, June (2nd Quarter) July, August, September (3rd Quarter) October, November, December (4th Quarter) April 28 July 28 October 28 January 28 C. INFLUENT MONITORING REQUIREMENTS The facility is required to meet a removal efficiency of 85% or more. The monitoring requirements shall become effective upon issuance and remain in effect until expiration of the permit. To determine removal efficiencies, the influent wastewater shall be monitored by the permittee as specified below: SAMPLING LOCATION AND PARAMETER(S) UNITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS MEASUREMENT FREQUENCY SAMPLE TYPE Influent mg/L mg/L once/month* once/month* 24 hr. composite 24 hr. composite Biochemical Oxygen Demands Total Suspended Solids MONITORING REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED MONTHLY; THE FIRST REPORT IS DUE April 28, 2009 . MO 780-0010 (8f91) C. INFLUENT MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (continued) * Additional monitoring may be required in order to comply with 10 CSR 20-9.010. Page 6 of 13 Permit No. MO-0101362 C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. This permit may be reopened and modified, or alternatively revoked and reissued, to: (a) Comply with any applicable effluent standard or limitation issued or approved under Sections 301(b)(2)(C) and (D), 304(b)(2), and 307(a) (2) of the Clean Water Act, if the effluent standard or limitation so issued or approved: (1) contains different conditions or is otherwise more stringent than any effluent limitation in the permit; or (2) controls any pollutant not limited in the permit. (b) Incorporate new or modified effluent limitations or other conditions, if the result of a waste load allocation study, toxicity test or other information indicates changes are necessary to assure compliance with Missouri's Water Quality Standards. (c) Incorporate new or modified effluent limitations or other conditions if, as the result of a watershed analysis, a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) limitation is developed for the receiving waters which are currently included in Missouri's list of waters of the state not fully achieving the state's water quality standards, also called the 303(d) list. The permit as modified or reissued under this paragraph shall also contain any other requirements of the Clean Water Act then applicable. 2. All outfalls must be clearly marked in the field. 3. Report as no -discharge when a discharge does not occur during the report period. 4. Changes in Discharges of Toxic Substances The permittee shall notify the Director as soon as it knows or has reason to believe: (a) That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels:" (1) One hundred micrograms per liter (100 µa); (2) Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 pg/L) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter (500 µg/L) for 2,5 dinitrophenol and for 2-methyl-4, 6-dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg/L) for antimony; (3) Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for the pollutant in the permit application; (4) The level established in Part A of the permit by the Director. (b) That they have begun or expect to begin to use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or byproduct any toxic pollutant, which was not reported in the permit application. (c) That the effluent limit established in part A of the permit will be exceeded. 5. Sludge and Biosolids Use For Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facilities (a) Permittee shall comply with the pollutant limitations, monitoring, reporting, and other requirements in accordance with the attached permit Standard Conditions. (b) Permittee is authorized to land apply biosolids, to use biosolids in mine reclamation projects, to compost biosolids, to landfill biosolids, or to use other DNR approved methods for disposal. Permit Standard Conditions, Part III shall apply to the land application of biosolids. The department may require submittal of a biosolids management plan for department review and approval as determined appropriate on a case -by -case basis. Page 7 of 13 Permit No. MO-0101362 C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (continued) 6. Water Quality Standards (a) Discharges to waters of the state shall not cause a violation of water quality standards rule under 10 CSR 20- 7.031, including both specific and general criteria. (b) General Criteria. The following general water quality criteria shall be applicable to all waters of the state at all times including mixing zones. No water contaminant, by itself or in combination with other substances, shall prevent the waters of the state from meeting the following conditions: (1) Waters shall be free from substances in sufficient amounts to cause the formation of putrescent, unsightly or harmful bottom deposits or prevent full maintenance of beneficial uses; (2) Waters shall be free from oil, scum and floating debris in sufficient amounts to be unsightly or prevent full maintenance of beneficial uses; (3) Waters shall be free from substances in sufficient amounts to cause unsightly color or turbidity, offensive odor or prevent full maintenance of beneficial uses; (4) Waters shall be free from substances or conditions in sufficient amounts to result in toxicity to human, animal or aquatic life; (5) There shall be no significant human health hazard from incidental contact with the water; (6) There shall be no acute toxicity to livestock or wildlife watering; (7) Waters shall be free from physical, chemical or hydrologic changes that would impair the natural biological community; (8) Waters shall be free from used tires, car bodies, appliances, demolition debris, used vehicles or equipment and solid waste as defined in Missouri's Solid Waste Law, section 260.200, RSMo, except as the use of such materials is specifically permitted pursuant to section 260.200-260.247. 7. All involved personnel shall be trained in material handling and storage, and housekeeping of maintenance area. Upon request, proof of training shall be submitted to the Department. S. All paint, solvents, petroleum products and petroleum waste products (except fuels), and storage containers (such as drums, cans, or cartons) shall be stored so that these materials are not exposed to storm water. Spill prevention, control, and/or management shall be provided sufficient to prevent any spills of these pollutants from entering a water of the state. Any containment system used to implement this requirement shall be constructed of materials compatible with the substances contained and shall also prevent the contamination of groundwater. 9. Good housekeeping practices shall be maintained on the site to keep solid waste from entry into waters of the state. 10. All fueling facilities present on the site shall adhere to applicable federal and state regulations concerning underground storage, above ground storage, and dispensers, including spill prevention, control and counter measures. 11. Substances, regulated by federal law under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), that are transported, stored, or used for maintenance, cleaning or repair, shall be managed according to RCRA and CERCLA. Page 8 of 13 Permit No. MO-0101362 C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (continued) 12. Sewer Extension The department has approved the construction permit program to regulate and approve construction of sanitary sewers which are tributary to this wastewater treatment plant. This approval may be modified or revoked by the department prior to the sewage collection, transportation, or treatment facilities reaching their design limitations, if the facility falls into chronic noncompliance with the permit, or if the permittee fails to follow the terms and conditions of the submitted and approved program. This permit may be reopened and modified or alternatively revoked and reissued to incorporate new or modified conditions to the sewer construction permit authority, if information indicates changes are necessary to assure compliance with Missouri's Clean Water Law and associated regulations. When any of the above mentioned conditions occur, the permittee will be notified prior to any modification of this permit condition. Plans and specifications for all projects which include a proposed bypass must be submitted to the Department to provide record information for location and size of the by-pass. An annual report on the sewer extension program must be submitted by January 28 of each year to the Missouri Department of Natural Resources St. Louis Regional Office. The report must list the name of the projects approved and the length of sewers and force mains and the capacity of lift stations constructed under the sewer extension program. A summary of total flow at the treatment facility shall be included. Detailed project information and data including design flows and inspection records shall be available for review upon request. 13. An individual shall be designated by the permittee as responsible for environmental matters. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be implemented. The plan shall be reviewed and updated as needed, and shall be submitted with the application for operating permit renewal. 14. The permittee should continue to implement and refine a program that maximizes the capacity, management, operation, and maintenance (CMOM) of the collection system to assure the system is operated in a way that minimizes peak flows during wet weather events. 15. Permit -tee shall implement and enforce its approved pretreatment program in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 403. The approved pretreatment program is hereby incorporated by reference. Permittee shall submit to the Department on or before September 30 of each year a report briefly describing its pretreatment activities during the previous calendar year. At a minimum, the report shall include the following: (a) An updated list of the Permittee's Industrial Users, including their names and addresses, or a list of deletions and additions keyed to a previously submitted list. The Permittee shall provide a brief explanation of each deletion. This list shall identify which Industrial Users are subject to categorical pretreatment Standards and specify which Standards are applicable to each Industrial User. The list shall indicate which Industrial Users are subject to local standards that are more stringent than the categorical Pretreatment Standards. The Permittee shall also list the Industrial Users that are subject only to local Requirements; (b) A summary of the status of Industrial User compliance over the reporting period; (c) A summary of compliance and enforcement activities (including inspections) conducted by the Permittee during the reporting period; and (d) Any other relevant information requested by the Department. 16. As required in 40 CFR 122.21 (j)(4) the permittee shall, as part of its renewal application for this permit, submit to the department a written technical evaluation of the need to revise local limits under 40 CFR 403.5 (c)(1). Page 9 of 13 Permit No. MO-0101362 C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (continued) 17. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) tests shall be conducted as follows: SUMMARY OF WET TESTING FOR THIS PERMIT OUTFALL A.E.C. % FREQUENCY SAMPLE TYPE MONTHS #001 79.5 twice/year 24 hr composite March & September (a) Test Schedule and Follow -Up Requirements (1) Perform a MULTIPLE -dilution test in the months and at the frequency specified above. For tests which are successfully passed, submit test results USING THE DEPARTMENT'S WET TEST REPORT FORM #MO-780-1899 along with complete copies of the test reports as received from the laboratory, including copies of chain -of -custody forms within 30 calendar days of availability to the WATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102. If the effluent passes the test, do not repeat the test until the next test period. (a) For discharges of stormwater, samples shall be collected within three hours from when discharge first occurs. (b) Samples submitted for analysis of stormwater discharges shall be collected as a grab. (c) For discharges of non-stormwater, samples shall be collected only when precipitation has not occurred for a period of forty-eight hours prior to sample collection. In no event shall sample collection occur simultaneously with the occurrence of precipitation. (d) A twenty-four hour composite sample shall be submitted for analysis of non-stormwater discharges. (e) Upstream receiving water samples, where required, shall be collected upstream from any influence of the effluent where downstream flow is clearly evident. (f) Samples submitted for analysis of upstream receiving water may be collected as either a grab or twenty -four-hour composite as appropriate to the nature of the discharge. (g) Chemical and physical analysis of the upstream control and effluent sample shall occur immediately upon being received by the laboratory, prior to any manipulation of the effluent sample beyond preservation methods consistent with federal guidelines for WET testing that are required to stabilize the sample during shipping. (h) Any and all chemical or physical analysis of the effluent sample performed in conjunction with the WET test shall be performed at the 100% Effluent concentration in addition to analyses performed upon any other effluent concentration. (i) All chemical analyses included in the Missouri Department of Natural Resources WET test report form #MO-780-I 899 shall be performed and results shall be recorded in the appropriate field of the report form. (j) Where flow -weighted composite sample is required for analysis, the samples shall be composited at the laboratory where the test is to be performed. (k) Where in stream testing is required downstream from the discharge, sample collection shall occur immediately below the established Zone of Initial Dilution in conjunction with or immediately following a release or discharge. (I) Samples submitted for analysis of downstream receiving water may be collected as either a grab or twenty -four-hour composite as appropriate to the nature of the discharge. Page 10 of 13 Permit No. MO-0101362 C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (continued) (m) All instream samples, including downstream samples, shall be tested for toxicity at the 100% concentration in addition to any other assigned AEC for in -stream samples. (2) All failing test results along with complete copies of the test reports as received from the laboratory, INCLUDING THOSE TESTS CONDUCTED UNDER CONDITION (3) BELOW, shall be reported to the WATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 within 14 calendar days of the availability of the results. (3) If the effluent fails the test, a multiple dilution test shall be performed within 30 calendar days and biweekly thereafter, until one of the following conditions are met: (a) THREE CONSECUTIVE MULTIPLE -DILUTION TESTS PASS. No further tests need to be performed until next regularly scheduled test period. (b) A TOTAL OF THREE MULTIPLE -DILUTION TESTS FAIL. (4) Failure of at least two multiple -dilution tests during any period of accelerated monitoring violates the permit narrative requirement for aquatic life protection. (5) The permittee shall submit a summary of all test results for the test series along with complete copies of the test reports as received from the laboratory to the WATER PROTECTION PROGRAM, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 within 14 calendar days of the third failed test. (6) Additionally, the following shall apply upon failure of the third MULTIPLE DILUTION test: A toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) or toxicity reduction evaluation (TRE) is automatically triggered. The permittee shall contact THE WATER PROTECTION PROGRAM within 14 calendar days from availability of the test results to ascertain as to whether a TIE or TRE is appropriate. The permittee shall submit a plan for conducting a TIE or TRE to the WATER PROTECTION PROGRAM within 60 calendar days of the date of DNR's direction to perform either a TIE or TRE. This plan must be approved by DNR before the TIE or TRE is begun. A schedule for completing the TIE or TRE shall be established in the plan approval. (7) Upon DNR's approval, the TIE/TRE schedule may be modified if toxicity is intermittent during the TIE/TRE investigations. A revised WET test schedule may be established by DNR for this period. (8) If a previously completed TIE has clearly identified the cause of toxicity, additional TIEs will not be required as long as effluent characteristics remain essentially unchanged and the permittee is proceeding according to a DNR approved schedule to complete a TRE and reduce toxicity. Regularly scheduled WET testing as required in the permit, without the follow-up requirements, will be required during this period. (9) When WET test sampling is required to run over one DMR period, each DMR report shall contain A COPY OF THE DEPARTMENT'S WET TEST REPORT FORM THAT WAS generated during the reporting period. (10) Submit a concise summary in tabular format of all WET test results with the annual report. (b) PASS/FAIL procedure and effluent limitations: (1) To pass a multiple -dilution test: (a) FOR FACILITIES WITH A computed percent effluent at the edge of the zone of initial dilution, Allowable Effluent Concentration (AEC), OF 30% OR LESS THE AEC must be less than three -tenths (0.3) of the LC50 concentration for the most sensitive of the test organisms; OR, Page 1 l of 13 Permit No. MO-0101362 C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (continued) (b) (FOR FACILITIES WITH AN AEC GREATER THAN 30% THE LC50 CONCENTRATION MUST BE GREATER THAN 100%; AND, (c) all EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS equal to or LESS THAN the AEC must be nontoxic. MORTALITY OBSERVED IN ALL EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN THE AEC SHALL NOT BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT (AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL; P = 0.05) THAN THAT OBSERVED IN THE UPSTREAM RECEIVING -WATER CONTROL SAMPLE. WHERE UPSTREAM RECEIVING WATER IS NOT AVAILABLE MORTALITY OBSERVED IN THE AEC TEST CONCENTRATION SHALL NOT BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT (AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL; P = 0.05) THAN THAT OBSERVED IN THE LABORATORY CONTROL. THE APPROPRIATE STATISTICAL TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF METHODS FOR MEASURING THE ACUTE TOXICITY OF EFFLUENTS AND RECEIVING WATERS TO FRESHWATER AND MARINE ORGANISMS OR OTHER FEDERAL GUIDELINES AS APPROPRIATE OR REQUIRED. FAILURE OF ONE MULTIPLE -DILUTION TEST MAY BE CONSIDERED AN EFFLUENT LIMIT VIOLATION. (c) Test Conditions (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Test Type: Acute Static non -renewal Test species: Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow). Organisms used in WET testing shall come from cultures reared for the purpose of conducting toxicity tests and cultured in a manner consistent with the most current USEPA guidelines. All test animals shall be cultured as described in the most current edition of Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms. Test period: 48 hours at the "Acceptable Effluent Concentration" (AEC) specified above. Upstream receiving stream water shall be used as dilution water. If upstream water is unavailable or if mortality in the upstream water exceeds 10%, "reconstituted" water will be used as dilution water. Procedures for generating reconstituted water will be supplied by the MDNR upon request. Multiple -dilution tests will be run with: (a) 100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, and 6.25% effluent, unless the AEC is less than 25% effluent, in which case dilutions will be 4 times the AEC, two times the AEC, AEC, 1/2 AEC and 1/4 AEC; (b) 100% receiving -stream water (if available), collected upstream of the outfall at a point beyond any influence of the effluent; and (c) reconstituted water. If reconstituted -water control mortality for a test species exceeds 10%, the entire test will be rerun. If upstream control mortality exceeds 10%, the entire test will be rerun using reconstituted water as the dilutant. Page 12 of 13 Permit No. MO-0101362 SUMMARY OF TEST METHODOLOGY FOR WHOLE -EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTS Whole -effluent -toxicity test required in NPDES permits shall use the following test conditions when performing single or multiple dilution methods. Any future changes in methodology will be supplied to the permittee by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). Unless more stringent methods are specified by the DNR, the procedures shall be consistent with the most current edition of Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicitv of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, Test conditions for Ceriodaphnia dubia: Test duration: Temperature: Light Quality: Photoperiod: Size of test vessel: Volume of test solution: Age of test organisms: No. of animals/test vessel: No. of replicates/concentration: No. of organisms/concentration: Feeding regime: Aeration: Dilution water: Endpoint: Test acceptability criterion: Test conditions for (Pimenhales promelas): Test duration: Temperature: Light Quality: Photoperiod: Size of test vessel: Volume of test solution: Age of test organisms: No. of animals/test vessel: No. of replicates/concentration: No. of organisms/concentration: Feeding regime: Aeration: Dilution water: Endpoint: Test Acceptability criterion: 48 h 25 ± 1°C Temperatures shall not deviate by more than 3°C during the test. Ambient laboratory illumination 16 h light, 8 h dark 30 mL (minimum) 15 mL (minimum) <24 h old 5 4 20 (minimum) None (feed prior to test) None Upstream receiving water; if no upstream flow, synthetic water modified to reflect effluent hardness. Pass/Fail (Statistically significant Mortality when compared to upstream receiving water control or synthetic control if upstream water was not available at p< 0.05) 90% or greater survival in controls 48 h 25 ± 1°C Temperatures shall not deviate by more than 3°C during the test. Ambient laboratory illumination 16 h light/ 8 h dark 250 mL (minimum) 200 mL (minimum) 1-14 days (all same age) 10 4 (minimum) single dilution method 2 (minimum) multiple dilution method 40 (minimum) single dilution method 20 (minimum) multiple dilution method None (feed prior to test) None, unless DO concentration falls below 4.0 mg/L; rate should not exceed 100 bubbles/min. Upstream receiving water; if no upstream flow, synthetic water modified to reflect effluent hardness. Pass/Fail (Statistically significant Mortality when compared to upstream receiving water control or synthetic control if upstream water was not available at p< 0.05) 90% or greater survival in controls Total Toxic Organics (Note 3) Acenaphthene Acrolein Acrylonitrile Benzene Benzidine Carbon Tetrachloride (tetrachloromethane) Chiorobenzene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobenzene 1,2-dichloroethane 1,1,1-trichloroethane Hexachloroethane 1,1-dichloroethane 1,1,2-trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane Chloroethane Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether N-n itrosodi-n-propylamin e Pentachlorophenol Phenol Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Butyl benzyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octyl phthalate Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate 1,2-benzanthracene (benzo(a)anthracene) Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-benzopyrene) 3,4-benzofluoranthene (benzo(b)fluoranthene) 1 1,12-benzofluoranthene (benzo(b)fluoranthene) Chrysene Anthracene 1,12-benzoperylene (benzo(ghi)perylene) Fluorene 2-chloronaphthalene 2,4,6-trichlorophenol Parachlorometa cresol Chloroform (trichloromethane) 2-chlorophenol 1,2-dichlorobenzene 1,3-dichlorobenzene 1,4-dichorobenzene 3,3 -dich lorobenzidine 1,1-dichloroethylene 1,2-trans-dichloroethylene 2,4-dichlorophenol 1,2-dichloropropane (1,3-dichloropropane) 2,4-dimethylphenol 2,4-dinitrotoluene 2,6-dinitrotoluene 1,2-diphenylhydrazine Ethylbenzene Fluoranthene Page 13 of 13 Permit No. MO-0101362 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane Methylene Chloride (dichloromethane) Methyl Chloride (chloromethane) Methyl bromide (bromomethane) Bromoform (tribromomethane) D i ch l orobrom omethane Chlorodibromemethane Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Isophorone Naphthalene Nitrobenzene 2-nitrophenol 4-nitrophenol 2,4-dinitrophenol 4,6-dintro-o-cresol -nitrosodimethylamine N-nitrosodiphenylamine Phenanthrene 1,2,5,6-dibenzanthracene (dibenzo(a,h)anthracene) Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene (2,3-o-phenylene pyrene) Pyrene Tetrachloroethylene Toluene Trichloroethylene Vinyl Chloride (chloroethylene) Aldrin Dieldrin Chlordane (technical mixture and metabolites) 4,4-DDT 4,4-DDE (p,p-DDX) 4,4-DDD (p,p-TDE) Alpha-endosulfan Beta-endosulfan Endosulfan sulfate Endrin Endrin aldehyde Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide (BHC hexachlorocyclohexane) Alpha-BHC Beta-BHC Gamma-BHC Delta-BHC (PCB polychlorinated biphenyls) PCB-1242 (Arochlor 1242) PCB-1254 (Arochlor 1254) PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221) PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232) PCB-1248 (Arochlor 1248) PCB-1260 (Arochlor 1260) PCB-1016 (Arochlor 1016) Toxaphene Date of Fact Sheet: March 3, 2006, Updated February 20, 2009. Date of Public Notice: March 10, 2006 Date of Permit Modification February 27, 2009. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT FACT SHEET This Fact Sheet explains the applicable regulations, rationale for development of this permit and the public participation process. NPDES PERMIT NUMBER: MO-0101362 FACILITY NAME: MSD-Grand Glaize Wastewater Treatment Facility OWNER NAME: Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District LOCATION: Outfalls #001, #002 - Sec. 16, T44N, R5E, St. Louis County Outfalls #003, #004 - Sec. 8, T44N, R5E, St. Louis County Outfalls #005, #006 - Sec. 9, T44N, R5E, St. Louis County RECEIVING STREAM: Outfall #001, #002 - Meramec River Outfalls #003, #004, #005, #006 — Unnamed tributary to Grand Glaize Creek FACILITY CONTACT PERSON: Todd Heller TELEPHONE: (314) 861-6701 FACILITY DESCRIPTION AND RATIONALE The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) operates a wastewater treatment facility serving a portion of western St. Louis County under Missouri State Operating Permit MO-0101362 . MSD had applied for a construction permit to modify and expand the treatment facility. The current state operating permit was renewed January 26, 2007. Construction of the upgrades was completed Fall 2008. The operating permit is being modified on February 27, 2009. This modification had been placed on public notice on March 10, 2006. Note that the WQRS was revised on 8-18-06 which resulted in a change to cadmium limits, the same methodology and assumptions were used and public noticed for the renewal of the permit. For this permit modification, final monthly average limits for cadmium will be reduced from 1.1 mg/l to 0.9 mg/I. The revised WQRS is attached. (The following was from the Public Notice of March 10, 2006) The facility is considered an interim treatment facility and wastewater flow will eventually be diverted to a larger regional treatment facility with discharge to the Mississippi River. The facility will be expanded in order to provide treatment to the ultimate dry weather flow until the flow to the facility can be eliminated (based on elimination by year 2025). The facility will also be modified in order to meet more stringent discharge limitations being imposed due to State and Federal water quality standards. Wet weather flows to the facility are expected to increase when the collection sewer system is upgraded and bypassing in the collection system is reduced; additional expansion of the facility will be done in the future to address the future wet weather flows. The upgraded facility will have the ability to provide secondary treatment to a continuous flow of 21 MGD; and provide secondary treatment to a peak flow of 40 MGD. Flows exceeding 40 MGD will be stored in an existing three -cell lagoon with a storage capacity of approximately 23 million gallons. Stored flow is returned to the facility for treatment. Flows exceeding the storage capacity of the lagoon are discharged through outfall #002. The current annual average flow to the treatment facility is approximately 17 MGD. The treatment plant currently receives domestic and pretreated industrial wastewater. The treated effluent is discharged into the Meramec River through outfall #001. Outfall #002 is discharge from the three cell lagoon which occurs only during significant wet -weather events; #002 flow enters the #001 outfall pipe which discharges to the Meramec River. Outfalls #001 and #002 are sampled separately prior to the flow co -mingling. Outfalls #003, #004, #005, and #006 are stormwater outfalls from the treatment facility grounds and discharge to an unnamed tributary of Grand Glaize Creek. The modified facility will include coarse screening, an influent pump station, fine (6.25mm) screening, grit tanks, 4 circular primary clarifiers, 5 activated sludge aeration tanks with fine bubble air diffusion, 6 circular final clarifiers, chlorination (liquid hypochlorite), and dechlorination. Sludge handling will include 2 gravity thickeners, and 2 belt filter presses. Sludge is hauled from facility and either incinerated, landfilled, land applied or composted. An activated carbon odor control system will be added to critical areas of the facility. Monitoring Requirements and effluent limitations were developed by the Water Pollution Control Program, see the attached Water Quality Review Sheet, Dated 2-17-06. (revised 8-18-06). This permit will be modified upon completion of construction. Missouri Department of Natural Resources Water Protection Program Water Pollution Control Branch NPDES PERMITS AND ENGINEERING SECTION Water Quality Review Sheet Determination of Effluent Limits Facility Information FACILITY NAME: MSD, Grand Glaize WWTF NPDES MO-0101362 #: FACILITY 16 MGD oxidation ditch facility with TYPE /DEscRIPT ION: chlorination/dechlorination; sludge holding with sludge incineration at the MSD, Lemay or Bissell Point WWTP. Proposed facility expansion to 21 MGD. EDU: Ozark/Meramec Drainage 8-DIGIT HOC: 0714010 COUNTY: St. Louis 2 LEGAL NW SW SW Sec. 16, LATITUDE/LONGITUDE: +3832588/-09028155 DESCRIPTION: T44N, R5E WATER QUALITY HISTORY: Compliance with Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD5) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) effluent limitations. Reasonable potential analyses conducted for total ammonia nitrogen and total recoverable metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, and Zn); results are available upon request. Outfall Characteristics OUT FALL DESIGN FLAW (CFS) TREATMENT TYPE RECEIVING WATERBODY OTHER 001 32.55 Secondary (OXI D) Meramec River 002 0.372 Equiv. Secondary)(3 LAG003 Meramec River - 005 Variable Stormwater (STO R) Unnamed Tributary of Grand Glaize Creek Receiving Waterbody Information WATERBODY CLASS WBID 7Q10 (CFS) 1010 (CFS) 30Q10 (CFS) *DESIGNATED USES Meramec River P 2183 336.5 322.2 371.8 AQL, LWW, WBC, BTG, DWS, IND *Cool Water Fishery (CLF), Cold Water Fishery (CDF), Irrigation (IRR), Industrial (IND), Boating & Canoeing (BTG), Drinking Water Supply (DWS), Whole Body Contact Recreation (WBC), Protection of Warm water Aquatic Life and Human Health (AQL), Livestock & Wildlife Watering (LWW) COMMENTS: WQRS and associated water quality based effluent limits (WQBELs) and monitoring requirements developed to reflect results of reasonable potential analyses and newly promulgated water quality criteria (ammonia & metals) at the proposed facility expansion design flow (21 MGD). Mixing Considerations Mixing Zone (MZ). One -quarter (1/4) of stream volume of flow; length of one - quarter (1/4) mile [10 CSR 20-7.031 (4) (A) 4.B. (III) (a)] . Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID). One -tenth (0.1) of the mixing zone volume of flow [10 CSR 20-7.031(4) (A) 4.B. (III) (b)] . Low -Flow Condition Volume of Flow: Available data from USGS-07019000 (Meramec River near Eureka, MO) were used to calculate 7Q10, IQ10, and 30Q10 low flow values for the Meramec River. Daily streamllow data from I/1/64 to 9/30/04 were used to generate annual 7-day, 1-day, and 30-day low -flow values using the USGS SWSTAT 4.1 surface water statistics program. The resulting low -flows were fitted using the Log -Pearson Type 111 frequency distribution (Appendix A). Mixing zone and zone of initial dilution flows were derived from the results ofthese analyses. Flow (cfs) MZ (cfs) ZID (cfs) 7Q10 336.5 84.1 8.4 410 322.2 80.6 8.1 30Q10 371.8 93.0 9.3 Applicable mixing zone regulation: 10 CSR 20-7.031(4)(A)4.B.(III) Note: Future water quality reviews for this facility should include a CORMIX mixing zone study to further refine the MZ and ZID dimensions. (DesignFlow + ZIDF/ow I I.F.C.% = x 100 DesignFlow TMDL WATERSHED: (Y oR N) WET TEST (Y OR N) : Y Permit Limits and Information FREQUENCY: W.L.A. STUDY CONDUCTED: (Y OR N} DIsINFECTIoN REQUIRED: (YORN) OUTFALL ##001— Main Facility Outfall TWICE/YEAR A.E.C. 79.5 LIMIT: Y USE ATTAINABILITY ANALYSIS: (Y oR N) 10 CSR 20-7. 031(3)(I) PARAMETER UNITSDAILY MAXIMUM WEEKLY AVERAGE MONTHLY AVERAGE MONITORING FREQUENCX FLow MGD * * ONCE/DAY TEMPERATURE °C * * ONCE/WEEKDA Y BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (BOD5)*** MG/L 45 30 ONCE/WEEKDA Y TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS*** MG/L 45 30 ONCE/WEEKDA Y PH SU 6 - 9 6 - g ONCE/WEEKDA Y FECAL COLT FORM NOTE 1 1000 400 TW]CE/WEEK TOTAL RESIDUAL CHLORINE MG/L 0.024 0.012 ONCE/WEEKDA Y OUTFALL #001 (Cont) PARAMETER UNITS DAILY MAXIMUM WEEKLY AVERAGE MONTHLY AVERAGE MONITORING FREQUENCY TOTAL AMMONIA NITROGEN (MAY - OCT) MG/L 12. 6 6.3 TW]CEIWEEK TOTAL AMMONIA NITROGEN (NOV -APR) MG/L 12.6 6.3 TWICE/WEEK OIL & GREASE MG/L 15 10 ONCE/WEEK CADMIUM, TOTAL REC . µG/L 2.2 0.9 ONCE/QUARTER CHROMIUM, TOTAL REC. µG/L * * ONCE/QUARTER COPPER, TOTAL REC. µG/L * * ONCE/QUARTER LEAD, TOTAL REC . µG/L '2. 1 8.8 ONCE/QUARTER MERCURY, TOTAL REC . µG/L 1.2 0.8 ONCE/QUARTER NICKEL, TOTAL REC. µG/L * * ONCE/QUARTER ZINC, TOTAL REC. µG/L * * ONCE/QUARTER TOTAL Toxic ORGANICS µG/L * * ONCE/YEAR * - MONITORING REQUIREMENT ONLY, NOTE 1 - COLONIES/1 00 ML *** - This facility is required to meet a removal efficiency of 85% or more for BOD5 and TSS. Influent BOD5 and TSS data should be reported to ensure removal efficiency requirements are met. OUTFALL #002 - Wet Weather Overflow WET TEST (Y OR N) : FREQUENCY: N/A A.E.C. N/A LIMIT: N/A PARAMETER UNITS DAILY MAXIMUM WEEKLY AVERAGE MONTHLY AVERAGE MONITORING FREQUENCY FLOW MGD * r * NOTE 2 BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (BOD5)*** MG/L 45 NOTE 2 TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS*** MG/L 45 NOTE 2 PH SU 6- 9 6- 9 NOTE 2 FECAL COL IFORM NOTE 1 * * NOTE 2 TOTAL AMMONIA NITROGEN MG/L * * NOTE 2 TEMPERATURE °C * * NOTE 2 * - MONITORING REQUIREMENT ONLY, NOTE 1 - COLONIES/100 ML, NOTE 2 - ONCE/DISCHARGE/DAY *** - This facility is required to meet a removal efficiency of 65% or more for BOD5 and TSS. Influent BOD5 and TSS data should be reported to ensure removal efficiency requirements are met. OUTFALL #003, #004, #005, #006 - Stormwater WET TEST (Y CR N). I-;1;-1 FREQUENCY: N/A A.E.C. N/A LIMIT: N/A PARAMETER UNITS DAILY MAXIMUM WEEKLY AVERAGE MONTHLY AVERAGE MONITORING FREQUENCY FLOW MGD * * ONCE/QUART ER RAINFALL INCHES * * ONCE/QUART ER OUTFALL #003, #004, #005, #006 (Cont.) PARAMETER UNITS DAILY MAXIMUM WEEKLY AVERAGE MONTHLY AVERAGE MONITORING FREQUENCY BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (BOD5) MG a * * ONCEQART / D ER SETTLEABLE SOLIDS ML/L/H R 1 . 5 1 . O ONCE/QUART ER PH SU 6 - 9 6 - 9 ONCE/QUART ER OIL & GREASE MG/L 15 10 ONCE/QUART ER FECAL COLIFORM NOTE 1 * * ONCE/QUART ER * - MONITORING REQUIREMENT ONLY, NOTE 1 - COLONIES/100 ML Receiving Water Monitoring Requirements No receiving water monitoring requirements recommended at this time. Derivation and Discussion of Limits Wasteload allocations were calculated using water quality criteria or water quality model results and the dilution equation below: C_ (Cs x Qs)+ (Ce x Qe) (Qe + Qs) Where (EPA/505/2-90-001, Section 4.5.5) C = downstream concentration Cs = upstream concentration Qs = upstream flow Ce = effluent concentration Qe = effluent flow Chronic wasteload allocations were determined using applicable chronic water quality criteria (CCC: criteria continuous concentration) and stream volume of flow at the edge of the mixing zone (MZ). Acute wasteload allocations were determined using applicable water quality criteria (CMC: criteria maximum concentration) and stream volume of f ow at the edge of the zone of initial dilution (ZID). Water quality based maximum daily and average monthly effluent limitations were calculated using methods and procedures outlined in USEPA's "Technical Support Document For Water Quality -based Toxics Control" (EPA/505/2-90-001). Outfall #001 — Main Facility Outfall • Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5). 30 mg/L monthly average, 45 mg/L weekly average [10 CSR 20-7.015(8)(B)1.] MSD may petition and submit data to the department to obtain CBOD5 effluent limitations of 25 mg/L monthly average, 40 mg/L weekly average per 10 CSR 20-7.015 (8) (B) 6. • Total Suspended Solids (TSS). 30 mg/L monthly average, 45 mg/L weekly average [10 CSR 20-7.015(8) (B)1.] • pH shall be maintained in the range from six to nine (6 - 9) standard units [10 CSR 20-7.015 (8) (B) 2.] • Fecal Coliform. Discharge shall not contain more than a monthly geometric mean of 400 colonies/ 100 mL, daily maximum of 1000 colonies/100 mL during the recreational season (April 1 - October 31) [10 CSR 20-7.015(8)(B)4.A.] Future renewals of the facility operating permit will contain effluent limitations for E. coli which will replace fecal coliform as the applicable bacteria criteria. Total Residual Chlorine (TRC). Warm -water Protection of Aquatic Life CCC = 10 µg/L, CMC = 19 µg/L [10 CSR 20-7.031, Table A]. Background TRC = 0.0 µg/L Chronic WLA: Ce = ((32.55 + 84.1) 0 - (84.1* 0.0))/32.55 Ce = 35.8 µg/L Acute WLA: Co = ((32.55 + 8.4)19 - (8.4 * 0.0))/32.55 Co = 23.9 µg/L LTA, = 35.8 µg /L (0.527) = 18.9 µg/L [CV = 0.6, 99th Percentile] LTAa = 23.9 µg/L (0.321) = 7.7 µg/L [CV = 0.6, 99" Percentile] MDL = 7.7 µg/L * 3.11 = 23.9 µg/L [CV = 0.6, 99" Percentile] AML = 7.7 µg/L * 1.55 = 11.9 µg/L CV = 0.6, 95th Percentile, n = 4] Total Residual Chlorine effluent limits of 0.024 mg/L daily maximum, 0.012 mg/L monthly average are recommended if chlorine is used as a disinfectant. Standard compliance language for TRC, including the minimum level (ML), should be included in the permit. " Total Ammonia Nitrogen. Results from the reasonable potential analysis indicate reasonable potential exists for the RED, Grand Glaize WWTF to cause excursions above applicable ammonia water quality criteria in the Rieramec River; therefore, effluent limitations have been calculated. Early Life Stages Present Total Ammonia Nitrogen criteria apply [10 CSR 20- 7. 031 (4) (B) 7. C. & Table B3] . Seasonal temperature and pH obtained using water quality data from USGS-07019000 (Meramec River near Eureka, RV); background total ammonia nitrogen = 0.03 mg/L. Season mp (�CP pH(SU) Total Ammonia Nitrogen CCC (mg N/L) Total Ammonia Nitrogen CMC (mg N/L) Summer 23.4 7.9 1.58 10.1 Winter 6.1 7.9 2.80 10.1 Summer: May 1 - October 31, Winter: November 1 - April 30 Summer Chronic WLA: Ce = ((32.55 + 93.0)1.58 - (93.0 * 0.03))/32.55 Ce = 6.01 mg/L Acute WLA: Ce = ((32.55 + 8.1)10.1 - (8.1 * 0.03))/32.55 Ce = 12.6 mg/L LTA, = 6.01 mg /L (0.780) = 4.69 mg/L [CV = 0.6, 99" Percentile, n = 30] LTAd = 12.6 mg/L (0.321) = 4.04 mg/L [CV = 0.6, 99th Percentile] MDL = 4.04 mg/L * 3.11 = 12.6 mg/L [CV = 0.6, 99th Percentile] AML = 4.04 mg/L * 1.55 = 6.3 mg/L [ CV = 0.6, 95th Percentile, n = 4] Winter Chronic WLA: Ce = ((32.55 + 93.0)2.80 - (93.0 * 0.03))/32.55 Ce = 10.7 mg/L Acute WLA: Ce = ((32.55 + 8.1)10.1 - (8.1 * 0.03))/32.55 Ce = 12.6 mg/L LTA, = 10.7 mg /L (0.780) = 8.35 mg/L [CV = 0.6, 99`h Percentile, n = 30] LTAa = 12.6 mg/L (0.321) = 4.04 mg/L MDL = 4.04 mg/L * 3.11 = 12.6 mg/L AML = 4.04 mg/L * 1.55 = 6.3 mg/L 4] [ CV = 0.6, 99th Percentile] [ CV = 0.6, 99" Percentile] [ CV = 0.6, 95th Percentile, n = Maximum Daily Limit (mg Average Monthly Limit Season N/L) (mg N/L) Summer 12.6 6.3 Winter 12.6 6.3 " Oil & Grease. Conventional pollutant, effluent limitation for protection of aquatic life; 10 mg/L monthly average, 15 mg/L daily maximum. " Metals. Effluent limitations for some total recoverable metals (Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn) will be removed and replaced with monitoring only requirements as a result of the reasonable potential analyses. Effluent limitations for total recoverable cadmium, lead, and mercury will be retained and recalculated using updated MZ, ZID, and outfall specific statistical multipliers. METAL CMC (VG/L) CCC (�G/L) RECEIVING WATER CONCENTRATION ACUTE/CHRONIC (1AG/L) REASONABLE POTENTIAL Cadmium 7.1 0.3 22.8 / 8.3 Yes Chromium 794 100 (DWS) 72.2 / 25.8 No Copper 20 10 15.3 / 7.6 No Lead 100 4 19.0 / 8.0 Yes Mercury 2.4 0.5 1.3 / 0.5 Yes Nickel 660 73 _ 34.1 / 12.9 No Zinc 165 151 113.7 / 48.3 No Effluent limitations for total recoverable metals were developed using methods and procedures outlined in EPA/505/2-90-001 and "The Metals Translator: Guidance For Calculating A Total Recoverable Permit Limit From A Dissolved Criterion" (EPA 823-8-96-007). Protection of aquatic life criteria apply and water hardness = 150 mg/L. Due to the absence of contemporaneous effluent and in -stream data for total recoverable metals, dissolved metals, hardness, and total suspended solids with which to calculate metals translators, partitioning between the dissolved and absorbed phases was assumed to be minimal (Section 5.7.3, EPA/505/2-90-001). Freshwater criteria conversion factors for dissolved metals were used as the metals translator as recommended in guidance (Section 1.3, 1.5.3, and Table 1, EPA 823-B-96-007). If concurrent site -specific data for total recoverable metals, dissolved metals, hardness, and total suspended solids are provided to the department, partitioning evaluations may be considered and site -specific translators developed. METAL CONVERSION FACTORS WQBEL ACUTE CHRONIC Cadmium' 0.927 0.892 Yes Lead' 0.732 0.732 Yes Mercury 0.85 N/A Yes Conversion factors for Cd and Pb are hardness dependent. Values calculated using equation found in Section 1.3 of EPA 823-B-96-007 and hardness = 150 mg/L. Cadmium (Cd): Protection of Aquatic Life CCC = 0.3 gg/L, CMC = 7.1 �g/L [10 CSR 20-7.031, Table A]; Background Cd = 0.0 mg/L C (Chronic) = CCC/CF = 0.3/0.892 = 0.336 ig/L C (Acute) = CMC/CF = 7.1/0.927 = 7.66 �g/L Chronic WLA: Ce = ((32.55 I- 84.1) 0.336 - (84.1* 0.0)) /32.55 Ce = 1.20 µg/L Acute WLA: C, _ ((32.55 + 8.4)7.66 - (8.4 * 0.0))/32.55 Ce = 9.64 µg/L LTA, = 1.20 µg/L (0.373) = 0.45 µg/L [CV = 1.0, 99" Percentile] LTAa = 9.64 µg/L (0.204) = 1.97 µg/L [CV = 1.0, 99th Percentile] MDL = 0.45 µg/L * 4.90 = 2.2 µg/L [CV = 1.0, 99th Percentile] AML = 0.45 µg/L * 1.95 = 0.9 µg/L [CV = 1.0, 95" Percentile, n = 4] Lead (Pb): Protection of Aquatic Life CCC = 4 µg/L, CMC = 100 µg/L [10 CSR 20- 7.031, Table A]; Background Pb = 2.1 µg/L C (Chronic) = CCC/CF = 4/0.732 = 5.46 µg/L C (Acute) = CMC/CF = 100/0.732 = 137 µg/L C (Background) = 2.1/0.732 = 2.9 µg/L Chronic WLA: Ce = ((32.55 + 84.1)5.46 - (84.1* 2.9))/32.55 Ce = 12.1 µg/L Acute WLA: Ce = ((32.55 + 8.4) 137 - (8.4 * 2.9))/32.55 Ce = 172 µg/L LTA, = 12.1 µg/L (0.373) = 4.51 µg/L [CV = 1.0, 99`t" Percentile] LTAa = 172 µg/L (0.204) = 35.1 µg/L [ CV = 1.0, 99th Percentile] MDL = 4.51 µg/L * 4.90 = 22.1 µg/L [ CV = 1.0, 99th Percentile] AML = 4.51 µg/L * 1.95 = 8.8 µg/L [CV = 1.0, 95`h Percentile, n = 4) Mercury (Hg): Protection of Aquatic Life CCC = 0.5 µg/L, CMC = 2.4 20-7.031, Table A]; Background Hg = 0.1 µg/L C (Chronic) = CCC = 0.5 µg/L C (Acute) = CMC/CF = 2.4/0.85 = 2.8 µg/L Chronic WLA: Ce = ((32.55 + 84.1)0.5 - (84.1* 0.1))/32.55 Ce = 1.53 µg/L Acute WLA: Ce = ((32.55 + 8.4)2.8 - (8.4 * 0.1))/32.55 Ce = 3.50 pg/L LTA, = 1.53 µg/L (0.421) = 0.64 µg/L Percentile] LTAa = 3.50 µg/L (0.236) = 0.83 µg/L Percentile] [ CV = 0.85, 99" [ CV = 0.85, 99th µ.g/L [ 10 CSR MDL = 0.64 µg/L * 4.23 = 2.7 µg/L Percentile] AML = 0.64 µg/L * 1.80 = 1.2 µg/L Percentile, n = 4] [ CV = 0.85, 99th [ CV = 0.85, 95th Calculated WQBELs are greater than those found in the most recent facility state operating permit. In consideration of antibacksliding requirements, the existing effluent limitations of 1.2 µg/L maximum daily and 0.8 µg/L average monthly should be retained. Metal Maximum Daily Limit (µg/L) Average Monthly Limit (µg/L) Cadmium 2.2 0.9 Lead 22.1 8.8 Mercury 1.2 0.8 Outfall #002 — Wet Weather Overflow • Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5). 45 mg/L weekly average [10 CSR 20- 7.015 (8) (B) 3.E. (I)] . • Total Suspended Solids (TSS). 45 mg/L weekly average [10 CSR 20- 7.015(8) (B) 3.E. (I)] . • 0. pH shall be maintained in the range from six to nine (6 - 9) standard units [10 CSR 20-7.015 (8) (B) 3.E. (II)] . • Fecal Coliform. Monitoring only requirement. • Total Ammonia Nitrogen. Monitoring only requirement. • Temperature. Monitoring only requirement. Outfall #003, #004, #005, #006 - Stormwater Effluent limitations and monitoring requirements from the previous Missouri State Operating Permit have been retained. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) similar to that submitted for the MSD, Coldwater Creek facility must be submitted to the department for review and approval. Upon renewal of the next operating permit, the department will determine the effectiveness of the SWPPP by evaluating the data collected and reduce the frequency or need for the retained effluent limits and monitoring requirements as necessary. Reviewer: John Hoke Date: February 17, 2006 Revised: August 18, 2006 Unit Chief: Refaat Mefrakis Monitoring and effluent limits contained within this document have been developed in accordance with EPA guidelines using the best available data and are believed to be consistent with Missouri's Water Quality Standards and Effluent Regulations. If additional water quality data or anecdotal information are available that may affect Appendix A. Log -Pearson Type III Statistics SWSTAT 4.1 (based on USGS Program A193) Notice Use of Log -Pearson Type III or Pearson -Type III distributions are for preliminary computations. User is responsible for assessment and interpretation. USGS-07019000 April 1 March 31 1964 - 2004 7-day low 31 304.429 504.714 630.429 307.143 510.571 715.000 519.571 0 10 Meramec River near Eureka, MO - start of season - end of season - time period - parameter - non -zero values - zero values - negative values (ignored) 315.714 602.857 591.000 464.143 519.714 521.571 305.429 624.143 613.143 340.000 841.714 383.429 The following 7 statistics are based on Mean (logs) Variance (logs) Standard Deviation (logs) Skewness (logs) Standard Error of Skewness (logs) Serial Correlation Coefficient (logs) Coefficient of Variation (logs) Non-exceedance Recurrence Probability Interval 0.0100 0.0200 0.0500 0.1000 0.2000 0.3333 0.5000 0.8000 0.9000 0.9600 0.9800 0.9900 Appendix A (cont.) 100.00 50.00 20.00 10.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 1.25 1.11 1.04 1.02 1.01 364.286 392.286 453.000 522.571 318.286 490.143 695.714 768.714 602.714 637.000 471.286 664.143 non -zero values: 2.695 0.016 0.128 -0.286 0.421 0.428 0.048 Parameter Value 234.278 258.305 297.796 336.517 388.186 440.784 502.302 637.155 715.948 806.129 867.669 925.147 Log -Pearson Type III Statistics SWSTAT 4.1 (based on USGS Program A193) Notice Use of Log -Pearson Type I1I or Pearson -Type III distributions are for preliminary computations. User is responsible for assessment and interpretation. USGS-07019000 Meramec River near Eureka, MO April 1 - start of season March 31 - end of season 1964 - 2004 - time period 1-day low - parameter 31 - non -zero values 0 - zero values 10 - negative values (ignored) 292.000 492.000 601.000 290.000 495.000 702.000 495.000 312.000 567.000 580.000 457.000 479.000 516.000 285.000 572.000 595.000 326.000 833.000 368.000 352.000 370.000 439.000 486.000 313.000 446.000 654.000 723.000 584.000 614.000 449.000 658.000 The following 7 statistics are based on non -zero values: Mean (logs) Variance (logs) Standard Deviation (logs) Skewness (logs) Standard Error of Skewness (logs) Serial Correlation Coefficient (logs) Coefficient of Variation (logs) 2.677 0.017 0.129 -0.240 0.421 0.429 0.048 Non-exceedance Recurrence Parameter Probability Interval Value 0.0100 0.0200 0.0500 0.1000 0.2000 0.3333 0.5000 0.8000 0.9000 0.9600 0.9800 0.9900 Appendix A (cont.) Notice 100.00 50.00 20.00 10.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 1.25 1.11 1.04 1.02 1.01 225.749 248.365 285.603 322.216 371.267 421.473 480.524 611.551 689.163 779.011 840.977 899.347 Log -Pearson Type III Statistics SWSTAT 4.1 (based on USGS Program A193) Use of Log -Pearson Type III or Pearson -Type III distributions are for preliminary computations. User is responsible for assessment and interpretation. USGS-07019000 Meramec River near Eureka, MO April 1 - start of season March 31 - end of season 1964 - 2004 - time period 30-day low - parameter 31 - non -zero values 0 - zero values 10 - negative values (ignored) 326.400 609.467 908.533 369.500 546.133 983.567 567.967 345.967 659.000 665.300 501.133 569.300 532.867 377.100 748.400 772.067 374.000 905.267 426.667 388.333 460.167 484.733 590.500 337.900 622.433 811.833 1004.600 702.067 725.933 523.200 751.567 The following 7 statistics are based on non -zero values: Mean (logs) Variance (logs) Standard Deviation (logs) Skewness (logs) Standard Error of Skewness (logs) Serial Correlation Coefficient (logs) Coefficient of Variation (logs) 2.755 0.021 0.144 -0.063 0.421 0.321 0.052 Non-exceedance Recurrence Parameter Probability Interval Value 0.0100 100.00 0.0200 50.00 0.0500 20.00 0.1000 10.00 0.2000 5.00 0.3333 3.00 0.5000 2.00 0.8000 1.25 0.9000 1.11 0.9600 1.04 0.9800 1.02 0.9900 1.01 259.756 285.450 328.508 371.815 431.432 494.519 571.248 752.683 867.729 1008.383 1110.263 1210.028