HomeMy Public PortalAboutExhibit RC 86 - Rate Commission Third Discovery Request to MSD April 3, 2015Exhibit RC 86
BEFORE THE RATE COMMISSION
OF THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
For Consideration of a Wastewater
and Stormwater Rate Change Proposal
by the Rate Commission of the Metropolitan
St. Louis Sewer District
THIRD DISCOVERY REQUEST
OF THE RATE COMMISSION
Pursuant to §§ 7.280 and 7.290 of the Charter Plan of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer
District (the "Charter Plan"), Operational Rule 3(2) and Procedural Schedule §§ 1, 17 and 18 of
the Rate Commission of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District ("Rate Commission"), the
Rate Commission requests additional information and answers from the Metropolitan St. Louis
Sewer District ("District") regarding the Rate Change Proposal dated February 26, 2015 (the
"Rate Change Proposal").
The District is requested to amend or supplement the responses to this Discovery
Request, if the District obtains information upon the basis of which (a) the District knows that a
response was incorrect when made, or (b) the District knows that the response, though correct
when made, is no longer correct.
The following Discovery Requests are deemed continuing so as to require the District to
serve timely supplemental answers if the District obtains further information pertinent thereto
between the time the answers are served and the time of the Prehearing Conference.
THIRD DISCOVERY REQUEST
1. The Rate Model describes a growth rate for low income customers of 19% a year
for the period FY2015 FY2020 and 0% thereafter. See District Rate Model, tab "Inputs" Excel
lines 339-340. Please (a) describe the analysis that was performed to reach this conclusion; (b)
provide copies of any memorandum, report, work paper, summary, analysis, or schedule that
supports this conclusion; (c) describe the rationale for such conclusion.
RESPONSE:
2. The Rate Model lists factors utilized in allocating Operation & Maintenance
expenses. See District Rate Model, input values in tabs "OM-Funct" and "OM-Alloc". Please
(a) describe the analysis that was performed to determine this allocation; (b) provide copies of
any memorandum, report, work paper, summary, analysis, or schedule that supports this
conclusion; (c) describe the rationale for such conclusion.
RESPONSE:
3. The Rate Model lists factors utilized in allocating Plant Inventory. See District
Rate Model, input values in tabs "Plant-Funct", and "Plant-Alloc". Please (a) describe the
analysis that was performed to determine this allocation; (b) provide copies of any memorandum,
report, work paper, summary, analysis, or schedule that supports this conclusion; (c) describe the
rationale for such conclusion.
RESPONSE:
2
4. The Rate Model allocates Operations -Collection systems between wastewater -
collection, wastewater -conveyance, and stormwater. See District Rate Model, tab "OM-Funct".
Please (a) describe the analysis that was performed to determine this allocation; (b) provide
copies of any memorandum, report, work paper, summary, analysis, or schedule that supports
this conclusion; (c) describe the rationale for such conclusion.
RESPONSE:
5. The Rate Model allocates Collection Operation & Maintenance costs as (a) 10%
volume, 80% capacity, and 10% customer for collection, and (b) 20% volume and 80% capacity
for conveyance. See District Rate Model, tab "OM-Alloc" lines 8-9. Please (a) describe the
analysis that was performed to determine this allocation; (b) provide copies of any memorandum,
report, work paper, summary, analysis, or schedule that supports this conclusion; (c) describe the
rationale for such conclusion.
RESPONSE:
6. The Rate Model allocates the treatment portion of pumping operation &
maintenance costs to all treatment plant components (e.g. sludge, primary treatment, secondary
treatment and pumping, etc.) rather than directly to treatment pumping. See District Rate Model
tab "OM-Alloc". Please (a) describe the analysis that was performed to determine this
allocation; (b) provide copies of any memorandum, report, work paper, summary, analysis, or
schedule that supports this conclusion; (c) describe the rationale for such conclusion.
RESPONSE:
3
7. The Rate Model allocates plant inveslrnent for sanitary sewers as 20% volume,
80% capacity. See District Rate Model tab "Plant-Alloc". Please (a) describe the analysis that
was performed to determine this allocation; (b) provide copies of any memorandum, report, work
paper, summary, analysis, or schedule that supports this conclusion; (c) describe the rationale for
such conclusion.
RESPONSE:
8. The Rate Model allocates all sanitary sewer collection system plant, including
combined sewer assets, to sanitary sewer (Collection and Conveyance). See District Rate Model
tab "Plant-Funct." Please (a) describe the analysis that was performed to determine this
allocation; (b) provide copies of any memorandum, report, work paper, summary, analysis, or
schedule that supports this conclusion; (c) describe the rationale for such conclusion.
RESPONSE:
9. The Rate Model allocates the treatment portion of pumping station plant
investment to all treatment plant components rather than treatment pumping only. See District
Rate Model tab "Plant-Alloc." Please (a) describe the analysis that was performed to make this
determination; (b) provide copies of any memorandum, report, work paper, summary, analysis, or
schedule that supports this conclusion; (c) describe the rationale for such conclusion.
RESPONSE:
4
10. Please describe how stormwater projects were prioritized in each of the former
Red, Green and Yellow zones described in Rate Change Proposal, Section 5 at page 5-4 (a)
between each of the areas; (b) within each of the areas.
RESPONSE:
11. The Rate Model includes a high level summary of the CIRP only. See District
Rate Model "CIRP Input." The Rate Model includes a comment that references the Spreadsheet
"CIRP Inflation V2". Please (a) provide the "CIRP Inflation V2" spreadsheet; and (b) explain
why there are no design costs before FY17.
RESPONSE:
12. Should the Example for Liquidation figure be $7,731,541? See Appendix 7.1.5 of
the Rate Proposal Summary Schedule of Adjustments to SW CIRP Project.
RESPONSE:
13. The first table of Appendix 7.5.1 summarizes the Regulatory Fund and OMCI
Funds. (a) Please explain why OMCI funds are depleted until 2021 when, because of negative
capital costs, the fund balances rises again. (b) Please explain the reference to a 5 cent tax and a
1.2 cent tax. The next table shows "proposed" which ties with FY17 in the rate report. Note the
Proposed table references an 8.8 cent tax and a 1.2 cent tax. This is also indicated in the Rate
Model on the SW dashboard/graphs; however, the input data on the dashboard indicates 1.96
cent and 10 cent taxes. (c) Please provide Appendix 7.5.1 in Excel format.
RESPONSE:
5
14. Brian L. Hoelscher states in Direct Testimony that the balance in the current tax
funds will be used for improvements to the public stormwater system in the areas where these
taxes are collected. See MSD Exhibit 3A, p. 4, 11. 19-20. Please provide (a) copies of the
ordinances and ballot language if submitted to the voters which approved the imposition of each
of the (i) Regulatory Tax, (ii) the Stormwater O&M Tax, (iii) the OMCI Specific Subdistrict
Taxes; and (iv) the; and (b) describe "improvements to the public stormwater system.
RESPONSE:
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa O. Stump
LASHLY & BAER, P.C.
714 Locust Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63101
Tel: (314) 621-2939
Fax: (314) 621-6844
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing was sent by electronic transmission
to Janice Fenton, Office Associate Senior, Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District; Susan Myers,
Counsel for the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District; Brad Goss, Counsel for Intervener Home
Builders Association of St. Louis & Eastern Missouri; and Brandon Neuschafer and Diana
Vuylsteke, Counsel for Intervenor Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers on this 3rd day of
April, 2015.
Ms. Janice Fenton
Office Associate Senior
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
2350 Market Street
St. Louis, MO 63103
JFENTONi,stlmsd com
Ms. Susan Myers
General Counsel
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
2350 Market Street
St. Louis, MO 63103
smyers ,stlmsd.com
Mr. Brad Goss
Smith Amundsen, LLC
120 South Central Avenue, Suite 700
St. Louis, MO 63105-1794
bgoss@salawus.com
Mr. Brandon W. Neuschafer
Ms. Diana M. Vuylsteke
Bryan Cave LLP
211 N. Broadway, Suite 3600
St. Louis, MO 63102
bwneuschafer@brvancave.com
dmvuylsteke(Oryancave.com