HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution 64-335RESOLUTION NO. 63 -335
RESOLUTION DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE APPROVAL OF WALTER
A. SAWYER AND EMORY F. SAWYER
FROM DENIAL OF VARIANCE BY
PLANNING COMMISSION.
WHEREAS on August 30, 1963 Walter A. and Emory F. Sawyer,
hereinafter referred to as "Applicant" filed application for a
Zone Variance in Zone Variance Case No. 63 -55 to create four
parcels, without required frontage on a public street as required
by Ordinances 63 -103 and 63 -104 in an R -1 -5000 Zone, which zone
is a single family residence zone, having a 5000 square foot
minimum area requirement, and
WHEREAS it was determined, subsequent to the filing of the
above referenced applicant that the requested division of real
property resulted in a subdivision requiring compliance with
Ordinance 63 -107, Sections 100 through 417, and
WHEREAS on October 7, 1963 the subject application for zone
variance was denied by the Planning Commission based upon the
necessity that the applicant comply with Ordinance 63 -107,
Sections 100 through 417, and
WHEREAS the appeal of the Applicant was duly noticed and
Applicant's appeal was heard before the City Council on
November 11, 1963 and thereafter continued to November 25, 1963,
in order to provide Applicant with an opportunity to present to
the City an alternate proposal, taking into consideration a sub
division of the subject property, even though same, due to the
particular nature of the subject property, might require a
slightly sub- standard subdivision development, and
WHEREAS the. Applicant has cooperated with the City and
made a concerted effort to cause a development of the subject
property to the best interest of the City and the surrounding
area, and
WHEREAS the City desires to work with the Applicant to
cause the best possible development of Applicants property con-
sistent with proper planning,
NOW THEREFOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1, The Applicant's appeal from the decision of
the. Planning Commission, embodied in Planning Commission Reso-
lution No, 63 -45PC is hereby denied, but without prejudice to
further proceedings before the Planning Commission and City
Council as hereinafter set forth.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the requested var-
iance of Applicant was made without the Applicant's awareness
that the application as made would require a lawful subdivision
under Ordinance No. 63 -107; that the Applicant's property may
not, however, be able to be developed in full compliance with
standard sub - division regulations and the best interests of the
property in the general area and the City will be best served if
a subdivision can be developed, even if said subdivision may
require allowances below the standards in effect; that a more
favorable development will be had if the subject property is
developed as a sub - standard subdivision as opposed to a variance
development.
-1 -
449
SECTION 3. The City Council does hereby find that in the
event a subdivision, standard or sub- standard, cannot be worked
out that Applicant can again file a zone variance for consider-
ation with the City and without prejudice to any former findings
and without additional fee.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 23d day of December 1963.
City C lerk o the ity
a
City Clerk
Temple City, California
ayor o
California.
-.2-
450