HomeMy Public PortalAbout19750709 - Minutes - Board of Directors (BOD) Meeting 75-16
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
Regular Meeting
Board of Directors
M I N U T E S
July 9 , 1975 745 Distel Drive
Los Altos, CA
I, ROLL CALL
President Duffy called the meeting to order at 7 : 35 P.M.
Members Present : Katherine Duffy, Barbara Green, Nonette
Hanko, Edward Shelley and Daniel Wendin
Personnel Present: Herbert Grench, Edward Jaynes, Jon Olson,
Anne Crosley, Jennie George, Stanley Norton, Carroll Harring-
ton and Robert Garcia.
II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of May 28 and 30 , 1975
The Board considered a memorandum (M-75-89) dated June 24 ,
1975 from A. Crosley regarding the Minutes of May 28 and 30 ,
1975. The memorandum reflected comments made by the Directors
taken from the tape of that meeting during consideration of
a two-term limit for Directors.
Motion: N. Hanko moved that the minutes of May 28 and 30 ,
1975 be amended on page four, paragraph four, line
six, after " (2) " to read as follows :
11 (2) since the subject of term limita-
tion has been a public issue solely in
Mountain View there is no basis to con-
clude it is an issue elsewhere in the
District. . . "
and that the following sentence attributable to B.
Green be included on page five of the minutes after
paragraph two:
"By 1982 it may well be that each of the
cities in our District may have initiated
two term limits themselves, anyway. There ' s
a trend in that direction. "
I
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of July 9 , 1975
D. Wendin said his name was incorrectly listed in the second
to the last line on page five of the minutes of July 9 , 1975
as the person who made a substitute motion. N. Hanko' s name c
should replace his, he added.
K. Duffy stated the consensus that the minutes of July 9 , 1975
be approved with the above change.
Meeting 75-16 Page two
B. Green seconded the motion.
Discussion: D. Wendin said he did not see there was
a need to change the statement made by N. Hanko in
the minutes. E. Shelley suggested the word "directors"
could be substituted for the word "voters" , but he
felt that small points of discussion should be not
included. N. Hanko withdrew her motion.
Motion: N. Hanko moved that the minutes of May 28 and 30 ,
1975 be amended on page four, paragraph four, line
six, after " (2) " to read as follows :
" (2) a Board of Directors should not
impose their restriction on Board mem-
bers ' terms in another community. "
E. Shelley seconded the motion. The motion passed un-
animously.
B. Minutes of June 25 , 1975
K. Duffy stated the consensus that the minutes of June 25 ,
1975 be approved as presented.
C. Minutes of June 30 , 1975
K. Duffy stated the consensus that the minutes of June 30 ,
1975 be approved as presented.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
E. Shelley asked that the proposed development plans of the
Newhall Land and Farming Company in the Mountain View Baylands
be considered under New Business Requiring Action.
K. Duffy said she had a Special Order of the Day to add to
the agenda.
H. Grench asked that support by the District for the proposed
Matadero Ridge Park in Los Altos Hills be considered under
New Business Requiring Action.
E. Shelley suggested that the Review of Salary Ranges , under
New Business Requiring Action, be considered prior to the
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Reg-
ional Park District Adopting Budget for Fiscal Year 1975-1976
As Amended, which is on the agenda as old Business Requiring
Action.
K. Duffy stated the consensus that all of the above changes
in the agenda were acceptable to the Board.
Meeting 75-16 Page three
IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
There were no oral communications at this time.
V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A. Crosley advised the Board there were two communications
from the Sierra Club, one regarding the District's tax rate
and the other concerning its policy on urban open space.
There was also a communication from Ms. Pat Maguire on her
position with respect to a Public Trail System Along the
Stevens Creek Park Chain.
A. Crosley referred the Board to a communication from Ms .
Nancy Jewell Cross , spokesperson for the Committee for Safe
and Sensible San Francisquito Creek Area Routing. Ms. Cross
planned to attend the District's meeting later and hoped to
explain her letter at that time.
VI . SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
K. Duffy presented S. Norton, newly-elected Mayor of the City
of Palo Alto, with a card and gift from the Board and staff
of the District in recognition of his new position.
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Policy on Urban Open Space
H. Grench introduced three items sent to the Board for their
reference in considering the District's policy on urban open
space : A memorandum from K. Duffy and D. Wendin (M-75-73)
dated May 7 , 1975 regarding the Basic Policy Statements Sub-
committee Report; a memorandum from the General Manager (M-
75-77) dated May 16, 1975 regarding the Master Plan Policy
Statements Subcommittee Report Draft; and a communication from
the Town of Los Gatos expressing support for the District' s
policy of considering land for acquisition located in the
foothills and baylands and not in urbanized areas. H. Grench
noted that at the Board meeting of May 28 , 1975 , the Board
adopted the following amendment to the District 's Basic
Policy:
"The District will use its available re-
sources primarily to acquire open space
outside the Urban Service Area boundaries
of the cities. This policy would allow
some acquisition of key open space out-
side the urbanized area but within the
Urban Service Area. "
Meeting 75-16 Page four
H. Grench recalled that the Board' s consensus at that meet-
ing was to hold a public hearing at a future Board meeting
on the question of whether to include a reference to urban
open space of regional significance in the Basic Policy of
the District.
D. Wendin said he favored a statement of the Board's policy
on urban open space of regional significance and that it should
be included in the Master Plan.
E. Shelley said he would support changing the second sentence
in the Basic Policy to exclude the words "outside the urban-
ized area but" , rather than adding a third sentence. He
noted that Urban Service Areas could change.
H. Grench suggested the change would alter the meaning of
the statement to indicate the District would consider acquisi-
tion in urbanized areas rather than on the "fringe. "
K. Duffy opened the public hearing at 8 :13 P.M.
Dr. Robert Mark, 725 Cowper, Palo Alto, said he was represent-
ing the Committee for Green Foothills , which supported the
position of the General Manager as expressed in his memorandum
of May 16 , 1975. The Committee opposed inclusion of alteration
No. 3 set forth in the Subcommittee report of May 7 , 1975 , and
also opposed deletion of the words "outside the urbanized area
but" from the existing second sentence.
Mr. Colin Miller, 1013 Paradise Way, Palo Alto, said he repre-
sented the Sierra Club, which had directed a letter to the
Board regarding its policy on urban open space. He urged
the Board to maintain the District's existing policy of acquir-
ing land outside the urban area. According to the Sierra Club
letter "this policy frees the cities from buying property in
surrounding areas and enables cities to use funds to purchase
land within their own boundaries for parks and open space.
This policy further enables the cities ' people to use foothill
and mountain regional parks close to their city's boundary. "
D. Wendin pointed out that the Sierra Club was supporting a
policy of the District to acquire land outside the urban areas,
but the Sierra Club also earlier supported acquisition of El
Retiro and establishment of a trail along Stevens Creek, which
are both in urban areas. R. Marks replied that the word "pri-
marily" in the first Basic Policy sentence covers such instances.
To leave the Basic Policy as it is , he said, does not preclude
consideration of urban open space by the District, but to
change the statement as proposed might invite a flood of re-
quests for the District to purchase urban open space.
Meeting 75-16 Page five
B. Green said she did not feel the District' s tax base was
great enough for the Board to be in a position to consider
land in urban areas going for prices in the neighborhood of
$60,000 per acre.
N. Hanko reminded the Board that the ballot argument for the
creation of the District assured the voters that its purpose
would be to acquire land in the foothills and baylands out-
side the urban area. She said she did not feel references
to urban open space belonged in the District' s Basic Policy.
Ms. Pat Maguire, 1013 East Cardinal, Sunnyvale, suggested
the District would face many problems in urbanized areas ,
such as jurisdictional disputes, established residential
areas , etc. She said the District should concentrate its
efforts in the foothills.
Ms. Lois Daley, 1573 Ashcroft Way, Sunnyvale, asked how the
District 's open space plans coincided with the County' s plans.
N. Hanko replied that the District is listed in the County's
Open Space Action Plan as a coordinator or as an initiator
for certain activities in accordance with the District' s
Basic Policy. Generally speaking, the District will encourage
trails in urban areas, she said. Ms . Daley said that as a
citizen she did not want to see duplication of County, city
and District efforts regarding park and open space plans. If
the District was performing a special function, e.g. , acqui-
sition of open space outside the urban area, it should con-
tinue that function rather than duplicate efforts another juris-
diction should be concerned with.
H. Grench noted that although the County has an open space
plan, its means of implementing the plan are limited to zoning
and some funds for acquisition. It is not the program of the
County to acquire large open space parcels in the foothills.
K. Duffy closed the public hearing at 8 :32 - P.M.
Motion: D. Wendin moved that appropriate language be included
in the pending Master Plan to state that the policy
of the Midpeninsula Regional Park District is that
urban open space judged to be of regional significance
may also be considered for acquisition. K. Duffy
seconded the motion.
Amendment: N. Hanko moved to amend the motion to
read asfollows : The policy of the Midpeninsula Re-
gional Park District will be that urban open space
Judged to be of regional significance will be consid-
ered for acquisition. K. Duffy seconded the motion
to amend.
Substitute Motion: D. Wendin moved to substitute
the following motion for his original motion: The
Meeting 75-16 Page six
policy of the Midpeninsula Regional Park District will
be that urban open space judged to be of regional
significance maybe considexed .for acquisition., K.
Duffy seconded the motion. N. Hanko withdrew her
motion to amend.
Discussion: D. Wendin pointed out that he wanted the
Board to consider its policy on urban open space in
three areas - as a general policy of the Board to ap-
pear in the minutes of this meeting, as a portion of
the Basic Policy, and as part of the Master Plan docu-
ment.
Amendment: N. Hanko moved to amend the substitute
motion to read as follows : That appropriate language
be included in the Basic Policy to state that the
policy of the Midpeninsula Regional Park District
is that urban open space judged to be of regional
significance may also be considered for acquisition.
K. Duffy seconded the motion.
Discussion: E. Shelley suggested the term "urban open
space of regional significance" should be defined
prior to voting on the District's policy.
Action: The amendment to the substitute motion was
defeated unanimously. The substitute motion passed
on the following vote: AYES - D. Wendin, K. Duffy,
B. Green and E. Shelley; NO - N. Hanko.
Motion: D. Wendin moved that the policy just adopted by the
Board that urban open space judged to be of regional
significance will be considered for acquisition be
included in the Master Plan document. K. Duffy
seconded the motion.
Discussion: D. Wendin said he felt the policy should
be in a District document other than in the minutes.
He suggested it can be made clear that urban open
space is of low priority. The motion passed on the
following vote: AYES - D. Wendin, K. Duffy, B. Green
and E. Shelley; NO - N. Hanko.
Motion: K. Duffy moved that the following sentence be included
in the Basic Policy of the District: "Urban open
space judged to be of regional significance may also
be considered. " The motion failed for lack of a second.
Motion: E. Shelley moved that the second statement in the
Basic Policy of the District under the heading of
Strategic Emphasis be changed to read as follows :
"This policy would allow some acquisition of key
open space within the Urban Service Area. " K. Duffy
seconded the motion.
Discussion: D. Wendin said there were three areas
which the Board was considering regarding possible
acquisition of urban open space: open space in the
Meeting 75-16 Page seven
foothills, open space on the fringe of the urban area,
and open space in the urban area. He said he felt
the inclusion of a statement regarding urban open
space of regional significance in the Master Plan
was sufficient exposure to the public. The motion
passed on the following vote: AYES - K. Duffy, B.
Green and E. Shelley; NOS - D. Wendin and N. Hanko.
The Board recessed at 9 :06 P.M. and reconvened at 9 :20 P.M.
IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (continued)
A. Sand Hill Parkway Plan
Ms . Nancy Jewell Cross, 1902 Palo Alto Way, Menlo Park, said
she was representing the Committee for Safe and Sensible San
Francisquito Creek Area Routing. She introduced a letter
dated June 30 , 1975 , from the Committee urging the District' s
consideration of the Sand Hill Parkway Plan explained in the
letter. She said the Committee was concerned for all kinds
of transportation in the area and was aware that many juris-
dictions would be affected by it. The plan would provide
for bicycle-pedestrian trails along the Creek that would
join San Mateo County's Alpine Trail and Palo Alto's San
Francisquito Creek Trail. Changes that would occur under
the Sand Hill Parkway Plan would include : (1) an extension
of Olive Street to connect with Willow; (2) bridges at Olive
Street, Alma Street and San Mateo Drive; (3) parks coordinated
with bus routes; and (4) a variety of paths and trails for
off-road traffic. Implementation of the plan might result
in employment opportunities for trail development and park
sites. Ms. Cross asked that the Board consider approval of
the Sand Hill Parkway Plan.
N. Hanko suggested it might be premature to endorse a trails
plan prior to receipt of a proposed District trails plan by
the Trails Task Force .
K. Duffy stated the consensus that the Sand Hill Parkway Plan
of the Committee for Safe and Sensible San Francisquito Creek
Area Routing be submitted to the District' s Trails Task Force
for its study and recommendation.
VIII . NEW BUSINESS REQUIRING ACTION
A. Review of Salary Ranges
H. Grench introduced his report (R-75-15) dated July 3 , 1975
regarding the Review of Salary Ranges for the District' s full-
time employees. He explained that an annual review of salary
Meeting 75-16 Page eight
ranges is to be considered normally at the time of the adop-
tion of the annual budget. Because there was not enough time
to complete the review process prior to tentative adoption
of this year 's budget, a contingency fund of $3000 was allo-
cated by the Board for the use of the General Manager to
correct inequities which may be found as the result of the
review. At that time, it was noted that the $3000 was a
"ballpark" figure that might have to be adjusted after the
review was completed.
H. Grench explained that the Ranger position was not included
in the review process since it had been established just
recently. However, the job descriptions and salary ranges
for the positions of Assistant General Manager, Land Manager
and Administrative Secretary had not been reviewed for some
time and were therefore included. He noted that all three
positions, especially those of the Assistant General Manager
and Administrative Secretary, had changed a great deal since
they were originally established. As an example, he said,
the Administrative Secretary position consisted of mainly
secretarial duties a year ago. Now most of those duties are
performed by the Clerk-Typist, freeing the Administrative
Secretary to assist the General Manager in the administrative
functions listed in the revised job description for that
position. The Land Manager is responsible for several items
not included in the original job description for the position,
and it is evident that the current salary range is inadequate
in light of the wide range of responsibilities involved in
that job. The Assistant General Manager is now working on a
number of activities which have been initiated in the past
year which were not foreseen for the position when originally
established. In reviewing salary ranges for comparable posi-
tions, it is apparent that the salary range for the position
of Assistant General Manager is not current.
H. Grench said it was difficult to find comparable positions ,
but various responsibilities were considered on a proportionate
basis. He emphasized that the review process was conducted
as objectively as possible. He pointed out that the formula
used in calculating the new low and high ends of the revised
salary ranges was also used by the Hay Associates firm in its
management study for the City of Palo Alto. The formula
allows a 50% spread from the middle of the range to give
flexibility for the General Manager in determining salaries ,
and to give employees sufficient mobility within a given job
position. He stated that the additional allocation requested
in the amended budget for salary ranges , $4 ,300 , was arrived
at by calculating the amount needed to bring the full-time
employees up to the midpoint of their revised ranges. He
emphasized that he was not making a commitment to distribute
the entire amount or any particular portion of it, but that
that sum for the flexibility necessary to effectively manage
personnel matters.
Meeting 75-16 Page nine
In answer to a question from E. Shelley regarding the separa-
tion of the functions of granting salary increases for cost
of living and merit and making adjustments on the basis of
the salary range review, H. Grench replied that although the
total amount for all increases was lumped together in one sum
under General Manager Appointees, funds allocated for the
different categories would be used for the functions they were
designated for. He added that he might adjust some salaries
as the result of the range review only partially now, and
make further adjustments at individual salary review times.
It was the consensus of the Board that the Budget Subcommittee
should examine the background material and formula calculations
used for determining revised salary ranges and the proposed
budget allocation for this purpose. It was determined that
D. Wendin would take the place of B. Green on the Subcommittee
as she would be on vacation shortly. K. Duffy stated that
D. Wendin and E. Shelley would serve as the Budget Subcommittee
members for this purpose.
IX. OLD BUSINESS REQUIRING ACTION
A. Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula
Regional Park District Adopting Budget for Fiscal Year
1975-1976 As Amended
H. Grench introduced his report (R-75-16) on the Resolution of
the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Park Dis-
trict Adopting Budget for Fiscal Year 1975-1976 As Amended.
He noted that when the tentative budget was adopted by the
Board on May 28 , 1975, it was based on a 15% increase in
assessed valuations. The actual figure , according to infor-
mation received from the County of Santa Clara, is 16% . The
increase, however, is balanced by a decrease in expected
revenues from Home owners and Business Inventory Tax Relief
subventions. Regarding the Salaries and Benefits - General
Manager Appointees category, he recommended that the contin-
gency fund for salary range reviews be increased by $4 , 300 .
Since the Board had previously voted to reduce the entire
category by $1800 , an additional $2500 is therefore requested
for this fund.
H. Grench noted that the Board had tentatively adopted a 10C
per $100 assessed valuation tax rate for the 1975-1976 fiscal
year at the May 28 , 1975 meeting. He urged that this rate
be maintained due to increased costs for operation due to
inflation and the increased value of open space lands. Since
the District was also increasing its programs and land manage-
ment program, less money would be available for actual acqui-
sition. The District ' s cash position would be weak during
the coming fiscal year due to old commitments , and all pos-
sible sources of income were necessary.
Meeting 75-16 Page ten
H. Grench therefore recommended that the Board adopt the
budget for the 1975-1976 fiscal year as amended, and that it
maintain the 101� per $100 tax rate.
E. Jaynes advised the Board that the land values had been
rising during the past year at increases ranging from 22%
to 36% , based on available data. Using the Fremont-Older
Ranch as an example, in 1973 the property sold for $1700 per
acre. In 1974 it was appraised at $2250 per acre and placed
under an option which had been predicated on a purchase price
in 1975 of $2600 per acre. This would show a 32% increase
from 1973 to 1974, and a 15% increase from 1974 to 1975 . How-
ever, in 1975 a property similar to Fremont-Older and adjacent
to it sold for $3000 per acre. The percent increase in the
sale of this property in 1975 over the appraised value of
Fremont-Older in 1974 is 33% , which is similar to the 1973-74
rise in value of Fremont Older. It indicates that the 15%
rise in value of Fremont-Older from 1974 to 1975 was because
the price of the property had been frozen under an option.
D. Wendin said he did not think the Board had enough data
available to it to make a decision regarding the increase in
property values. He referred to his memorandum (M-75-94)
dated July 2 , 1975, regarding the creation of a Special Tax
Reserve for the District. He suggested the Board create a
Special Tax Reserve for the 1975-1976 budget and that all
income (and related borrowing power) in excess of the 1974-
1975 tax income plus 5% be placed in the Reserve. Disposi-
tion of the income would be determined as part of the 1976-
1977 budget. Attached to his memorandum was a revised Pro-
Forma Funds Statement which showed how the budget might be
changed under his formula. Cash and borrowing power would
be reduced for the purpose of placing funds in the Special
Tax Reserve.
D. Wendin said there were two purposes for the creation of
the reserve. First, it would give the District a year in
which to determine the increase in property values for open
space lands. Secondly, it would demonstrate the District' s
concern for the present economic situation, especially for
those who are living on fixed incomes. Based on many factors
at budget time next year, the Board could decide to reduce
its tax rate or maintain it.
N. Hanko expressed her opposition to the special tax reserve,
citing results of a survey in south San Mateo County showing
that those residents are willing to support a 10� per $100
tax rate if annexed by the Midpeninsula Regional Park District
in order to acquire open space. She circulated two news
articles showing average increases in assessments in Santa
Clara and San Mateo Counties of about 16% . In the face of
these assessments, she noted, people still consider the
preservation of open space worth paying for.
Meeting 75-16 Page eleven
E. Shelley said he supported the concept but thought it would
be difficult to implement. For example, how does one determine
the "historical" rate of increase .
Mr. Colin Miller, representing the Sierra Club, referred to
the June 8, 1975 letter of the Loma Prieta Chapter in support
of maintaining the District ' s tax rate. He reminded the
Board that once open space is gone, it is gone forever, and
he emphasized the importance of purchasing the remaining open
space as soon as possible.
Dr. Robert Mark, representing the Committee for Green Foothills,
strongly urged that the District maintain its tax rate of 10G
per $100 assessed valuation. He reminded the Board that when
open space is preserved, the tax rate will be less than if the
land is developed and the citizens must pay for services to
new residents. He suggested that the Midpeninsula Regional
Park District is indeed a "special" special district because
it was created through an initiative petition of the citizens.
Motion: D. Wendin moved that a Special Tax Reserve be estab-
lished in the 1975-1976 budget and that all income
(and related borrowing power) in excess of the 1974-
1975 tax income plus 5% be placed in this Reserve.
Disposition of this Reserve will be determined as
past of the 1976-1977 budget. B. Green seconded the
motion.
Amendment: E. Shelley moved to amend D. Wendin 's
motion by changing '15%" to "10%" . D. Wendin seconded
the motion to amend. The amendment passed on the
following vote : AYES - K. Duffy, D. Wendin and E.
Shelley; NOS - N. Hanko and B. Green. The motion
failed on the following vote : AYES - D. Wendin and
E. Shelley; NOS - N. Hanko, B. Green and K. Duffy.
Motion: N. Hanko moved adoption of Resolution No. 75-15 ,
a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the
Midpeninsula Regional Park District Adopting
Budget for Fiscal Year 1975-1976 As Amended. B.
Green seconded the motion. The motion passed
unanimously.
X. NEW BUSINESS NOT REQUIRING ACTION
A. Volunteer and Intern Program
A memorandum (M-75-98) from the General Manager dated July 2 ,
1975 , regarding the Volunteer and Intern Program of the Dis-
trict, introduced a memorandum (M-75-95) from J. Olson and
Carroll Harrington dated July 3 , 1975 describing the implemen-
tation of the Volunteer and Intern Program.
-Meeting 75-16 Page twelve
J. Olson advised the Board that the District was contracting
with the Environmental Volunteers for a Volunteer Coordinator
to help develop a volunteer and intern program for the District.
He introduced Ms. Ellie Huggins, an active conservationist,
who had accepted the position of Volunteer Coordinator. The
Volunteer Coordinator will work with the Land Manager and
Public Communications Assistant to develop activities and
guidelines for the implementation of a volunteer and intern
program for the District. J. Olson added that the Coordinator
would have regular office hours at the District, approximately
eight hours per week.
NEW BUSINESS REQUIRING ACTION
A. Newhall Land and Farming Company Development Plans
E. Shelley advised the Board that the Newhall Land and Farm-
ing Company planned a development near the baylands parcel
in Mountain View that the District was interested in acquiring.
The zoning for part of the Newhall property is industrial; the
rest is zoned open space-commercial. The allowable building
density for the open space-commercial zone is 10% or less,
and only certain uses are permitted, such as golf driving
ranges. He said the Newhall company intends to proposed a
trade-off of land so that it can extend its development into
the open space-commercial zone but designate the remainder
as open space. He said the Chairman of the Mountain View
Environmental Planning Commission would accept a letter from
the District ' s Board of Directors regarding the District ' s
concerns for the baylands area.
K. Duffy stated the consensus that the General Manager be
directed to send a letter to the Mountain View Environmental
Planning Commission expressing the District' s interest in
the preservation of the baylands in that area.
B. Matadero Ridge Park
H. Grench advised the Board that the Town of Los Altos Hills
had made application for Land and Water Conservation Funds
for the purpose of acquiring the approximately 60 acre Palo
Alto School District property located on Page Mill Road about
one mile south of Highway 280 near Alexis Drive. He suggested
it would be appropriate to send a letter to the State Depart-
ment of Parks and Recreation in support of the project.
K. Duffy stated the consensus that the President send a let-
ter to the State Department of Parks and Recreation in support
of the Matadero Ridge Park project of Los Altos Hills.
Meeting 75-16 Page thirteen
XII . CLAIMS
Motion: D. Wendin moved acceptance of the revised claims
(C-75-14) dated July 9, 1975 . B. Green seconded the
motion. The motion passed on the following vote :
AYES - D. Wendin, B. Green, K. Duffy and E. Shelley;
ABSTAIN - N. Hanko, because of Claim No. 1178.
XIII . EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Board recessed at 10 :50 P.M. to discuss land negotiations
and personnel matters.
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
The Board reconvened to adjourn at 12 :20 A.M.
Anne Cathcart Crosley
Administrative Secretary