HomeMy Public PortalAbout04-17-1997, frontage rd - business ownersNOTES FROM MEETING WITH BUSINESS OWNERS - FRONTAGE ROAD -
4-17-97:
Loren Kohnen introduced those in attendance - those in the audience introduced
themselves
The main players are the business owners/MnDOT - the county's only concern is where
the road would come out on 116
Tom O'Keefe, MnDOT said that limiting direct access if the biggest single most effective
way to keep the highway safe
Job - local - provide direct property access
- highway - provide thru/heavy traffic
Safest if road does only 1 function - Highway 55 does both - goal to limit access -
MnDOT has not project now - 116 is high volume - 300 vehicles for a left turn lane - 116
now has 500-600 - MnDOT and county can close access - medians do not have to be
purchased - if accidents persist or change of use of property - access do not have to be
permitted - but state looks long and hard to disallow direct property access - MnDOT is
interested in helping fund the frontage road - constructions funds will be provided if the
project results in closing direct accesses to 55
John Ferris wanted to know if something on 116 would trigger access or have affect on
the access issue - Tom O'Keffe said no - as part of a project
Loren Kohnen - if work is done on 116 - would that affect
O'Keefe said yes
Randy Mayer - 116 north of 55 - make 2 left turn lanes with painting
O'Keefe said there was nothing in the works for MnDOT
The county said that signal maintenance is the jurisdiction of MnDOT - if they decide to
make split lights - the county should be notified
Bill Toles - traffic - impact on 116 with proposed development on the corner
Loren Kohnen said that the peak traffic for McDonald's is at noon - when 116 has the
least amount of traffic
Bill Toles said there is heavy traffic at the McDonald's at 55/494
Dave Mayer said there is heavy residential growth on 116 - shouldn't just point finger at
McDonald's
Page 2 - Frontage road meeting - 116/55
Bill Toles said that commercial impact is immediate - residential slower
Jack Reis - should think about a light at 116 and Clydesdale
Shawn Gustafson - showed overhead from comprehensive plan of the intersection of
Clydesdale and 116 - showed concept of intersection
John Ferris - city has not done anything - just considering the project
Bill Toles said he was not willing to give up any land for increased traffic
Shawn - engineering standpoint - frontage road should be as far north of 55 as possible
Bill Toles - urged that business owners are given 3-5 years to make the changes that
are necessary for any changes in the roads
John Ferris - city does not initiate projects like this
Spokesperson from Murphy's - soils behind us are very bad - load?
Loren Kohnen said there would be a cul de sac - Loren asked O'Keefe how the road
would be built
O'Keefe - cooperative - agreement with city MnDOT pays all construction costs - city
pays if any drainage work - city responsible for design and ROW acquisition - MnDOT
pay construction
Shawn said the ROW is the biggest - storm sewer 10% - design 10% - estimate without
ROW - 1 million/mile or about 150,000 - city would pay 20-25% + ROW
There was talk of Arrowhead and 55 intersection
John Ferris - county spending millions to improve this intersection - city's view will not
change - will not initiate any road work
Dave Mayer - that's life - cities change
Bill Toles - embarking on something that will change our environment - he asks the city
to be very sensitive to it
Loren Kohnen said that all businesses are regulated with conditional use permits