Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPKT-CC-2017-02-28Moab City Council February 28, 2017 Pre-Council Workshop 6:30 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CENTER (217 East Center Street) Page 1 of 295 Page 2 of 295   Moab City Council Regular Council Meeting  City Council Chambers  Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 6:30 p.m.     6:30 p.m. PRE COUNCIL WORKSHOP   7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SECTION 1: APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1-1 February 1, 2017 1-2 February 8, 2017 SECTION 2: CITIZENS TO BE HEARD   SECTION 3: PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 3-1 Presentation of the Mayor’s Student Citizenship of the Month Award for February  2017 for Helen M. Knight School   SECTION 4: DEPARTMENTAL UPDATES 4-1 Community Services 4-2 Engineering 4-3 Public Safety 4-4 Public Works 4-5 Recreation/Trails 4-6 Recorder/Human Resources 4-7 Treasurer 4-8 City Manager  SECTION 5: PUBLIC HEARING (Approximately 7:15 PM) 5-1 None  SECTION 6: SPECIAL EVENTS/VENDORS/BEER LICENSES 6-1 Moab Farmer’s Market  Approval of Special Event Licenses for Moab Farmer’s Market to be held on  Selected Friday Evenings from May through October, 2017  1. Approval of a Special Business Event License  2. Approval of Park Use Permit for Swanny City Park  3. Approval of a License Fee Waiver not to exceed $290 and a Park Use Fee  Waiver of $35 per week for the duration of the Event  6-2 Moab Free Concert Series Approval of Permits for the Moab Free Concert Series to be held on Selected Friday  Evenings in July 2017  City of Moab 217 East Center Street  Moab, Utah 84532  Main Number (435) 259‐5121  Fax Number (435) 259‐4135  www.moabcity.org  Page 3 of 295 1. Approval of a Special Business Event License  2. Approval of  Park Use Permit for Swanny City Park  3. Approval of a License Fee Waiver not to exceed $290 and a Park Use Fee  Waiver of $35 per week for the duration of the Event  4. Granting of Local Consent for a Single Event Permit  5. Approval of a Park Alcohol Permit  6. Approval of a Class IV Beer License   6-3 Skinny Tire Festival Approval of Permits for Skinny Tire Festival to be held March 11 to 14 2017  1. Approval of a Special Business Event License  6-4 Approval of a Vendor License for Christine and Kent Green, d.b.a. Moab Cowboy  Country Off Road Adventures, Located at 83 South Main Street for a term of  March 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018  6-5 Approval of a Vendor License for Joelle Riddle and Max Schon, d.b.a. Yummytown  LLC, Located at 83 South Main Street for a term of April 1, 2017 to December 31,  2017 and February 1, 2018 to March 31, 2018  SECTION 7: NEW BUSINESS  7-1 Discussion, Consideration and Possible Approval of Proposed Resolution #14‐2017  ‐   A Resolution Approving a Zoning Status Agreement For the Lionsback Resort  7-2 Consideration and Possible Approval of a Committed Partnership Letter Agreement  between the City of Moab and The Climate Reality Project  7-3 Consideration and Possible Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2017‐07 – An  Ordinance Amending the Zoning for Three Parcels Located at 61 and 71 South 400  East in the R‐2, Single and Two‐family Residential Zone to R‐3 Multi‐Family  Residential Zone and Amending the Offical Zoning Map of the City of Moab, as  Referred to City Council by the Planning Commission  7-4 Consideration and Possible Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding between  the City of Moab and Moab Regional Hospital Regarding Communities that Care  7-5 Discussion Regarding the Golf Course Lease Agreement   7-6 Consideration and Possible Approval of Proposed Resolution #03‐2017 – A  Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit Concerning Housing on the Ground  Floor for the Mill Creek Multi‐family Housing Project on Property Located at 1780  East Mill Creek Drive in the C‐4, General Commercial Zone  7-7 Consideration and Possible Approval of Proposed Resolution #06‐2017 – Amending  the Fiscal Year 2016‐2017 Annual Budget  7-8 Consideration and Possible Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2017‐09 – An  Ordinance creating the Moab City Water Conservation and Drought Management  Advisory Board    SECTION 8: CONSENT AGENDA 8-1 Consideration and Possible Approval of a Procurement Exception as Allowed by  Moab Municipal Code 2.28‐110(B) ‐  State Approved Contracts/NJPA, For an  Equipment Lease with Xerox Corporation for a Copier in an amount not to exceed  $21,539.40  Page 4 of 295 8-2 Consideration and Possible Approval of a Sovereign Lands Permit through the  Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands to Moab City  8-3 Consideration and Possible Approval of Proposed Resolution #10‐2017 ‐  A  Resolution Approving an Improvements Agreement for the Buen Camino Boundary  Line Adjustement Located at 459 and 469 Bowen Circle in the R‐2, Single and Two‐ Family Residential Zone  8-4 Consideration and Possible Approval of Proposed Resolution #16‐2017 – A  Resolution Conditionally Approving the Final Plat for the Valley View Subdivision,  Phase II, on Property Located in the R‐2 Zoning District  8-5 Approval of Task Order #17‐04 with Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. accepting the  Scope of Work for the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan project with a fee amount not to  exceed $79,800   8-6 Approval of Task Order #17‐05 with Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. accepting the  Scope of Work for the Moab WRF Materials Testing project with a fee amount not to  exceed $40,888  8-7 Approval of Task Order #380.09.100 with Hansen, Allen and Luce, Inc. accepting the  Scope of Work for the Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan project with a fee  amount not to exceed $68,000   8-8 Approval of Change Order #1 with Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants,  Inc. accepting the additional scope of work for Geotechnical Consulting and  Materials Testing Services at the WRF project with a fee amount not to exceed  $15,500  8-9 Approval of Proposed Resolution #19‐2017 – A Resolution Approving the City of  Moab 2017‐2018 Permanent Community Impact Fund Board (CIB) Comprehensive  Projects List  8-10 Consideration and Possible Approval of Proposed Resolution #17‐2017 – A  Resolution Approving the Improvements Agreement for the Final Plat of Phase II of  Valley View Subdivision on Property Located in the R‐2 Zoning District  SECTION 9: MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS SECTION 10: READING OF CORRESPONDENCE SECTION 11: APPROVAL OF BILLS AGAINST THE CITY OF MOAB SECTION 12: EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION 12-1 An Executive Session to Discuss Pending or Reasonably Imminent Litigation  12-2 A Strategy Session to Discuss the Purchase, Exchange, or Lease of Real Property  SECTION 13: ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should  notify the Recorder’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532;  or phone (435) 259‐5121 at least three (3) working days  prior to the meeting.  Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org  Page 5 of 295 February 1, 2017   Page 1 of 5      MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ‐‐ DRAFT  SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING FEBURARY 1, 2017 The Moab City Council held a Special Workshop Meeting on the above  date in the Council Chambers at the Moab City Center, located at 217  East Center Street, Moab, Utah. A recording of the meeting is archived  at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html. Many of the documents  referred to are available on the City’s digital archive at  www.moabcity.org under Lionsback Library  (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B3xcEVsVfLMOTmw4NkI2Sm9 JUms). Councilmember Kyle Bailey called the Workshop to order at 12:03 PM.   In attendance were Councilmembers Kyle Bailey, Rani Derasary, Heila  Ershadi, and Tawny Knuteson‐Boyd.  Also in attendance were Interim  City Manager David Everitt, City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Rachel  Stenta, City Planner Jeff Reinhart, Community Services Director Amy  Weiser, City Engineer Phillip Bowman, City Attorney Chris McAnany,  Public Works Director Pat Dean, and Planning Assistant Sommar  Johnson.       The Workshop consisted of a Council Briefing on the Lions Back  Development. There were twenty members of the public and press in  attendance.    City Planner Jeff Reinhart presented information with input from other  staff. The presentation began with history of the use of the property and  the zoning and annexation history. He noted the lawsuit regarding the  proposed resort development that lasted from 2008 to 2012.     Reinhart outlined the planning zone guidelines and planning process for  such a development, as well as landscape requirements and lighting  restrictions, parking and amenities planned, and the scope of the  phased project. He mentioned a culvert upgrade on Sand Flats Road and  outlined the storm water system and proposed sanitary sewer system.   He went on to describe the development’s plans for Sand Flats Road.  He described what has been approved so far, and then went on to  introduce what is proposed for the amended plan.     Interim City Manager Everitt asked about whether the proposed  changes meet the intent of the visual impact zoning expectations with  regard to sensitive areas. Reinhart stated that they do. Reinhart    SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING  & ATTENDANCE                                       WORKSHOP                                                      Page 6 of 295 February 1, 2017   Page 2 of 5      explained that the development requires approval of the Final Plat,  which is the current juncture in the process.     He mentioned concerns about the Drinking Water Protection Plan. He  stated the plan is comprehensive and he outlined potential  contaminants to the water table. He stated the developers do address  and attempt to mitigate all the potential contamination issues. Reinhart  showed how the development overlaps the City’s Skakel Springs water  protection area boundary. Reinhart stated that it is possible to build in  this area. City Attorney McAnany asked if that area was considered Zone  Two and Reinhart replied that it was.  Councilmember Bailey asked if all  of the sewer pipes and infrastructure were within the City (not Spanish  Valley) and Reinhart stated they are.    He went on to describe a proposed new road that would parallel Sand  Flats Road to access the property. Interim City Manager Everitt asked for  clarification that the road improvements proposed in sheet C‐2 were not  on the project property.     Reinhart suggested there might be a property assessment to pay for  some infrastructure expenses for the City, and outlined the proposed  financial structure for the improvements.  Councilmember Bailey asked  if there was a real estate transfer fee and Reinhart affirmed that there  was.     He pointed out the Agreements associated with the project, and then  outlined the Amendment procedures, specifically the difference  between major and minor changes. He presented a written legal  position provided by City Attorney McAnany describing the proposed  changes as major changes.     City Attorney McAnany then reviewed the history of the lawsuit,  followed by his communications with the State and Institutional Land  Trust Administration (SITLA) regarding their objection to McAnany’s  recommendation that the amendments be considered major changes,  as well as their position that SITLA is exempt from local land use code  and they objected to the delay caused by the public process required for  major changes. SITLA sent an agreement stating that they can withdraw  this development from local land use planning processes or SITLA would  allow the current planning process to continue only if the City considers  the changes as minor changes, thereby subject to staff level review only.    Councilmember Ershadi commented that she felt uncomfortable with                                          39 minutes                                            45:01                              Page 7 of 295 February 1, 2017   Page 3 of 5      using the major versus minor change as a bargaining tool for the overall  approved development. City Attorney McAnany reiterated that he  believes the changes are major. Interim City Manager Everitt clarified  that the topic was subject to internal debate, and the staff determined it  was a major change. Councilmember Derasary also felt it was a major  change.     Councilmember Ershadi mentioned public comment about the proposed  development and emphasized citizen concerns about public health and  safety related to drinking water source protection and traffic and safety  on Sand Flats Road.  Planner Reinhart stated that the developer has  done everything required. City Attorney McAnany added that the water  source protection plan was carefully studied prior to the original  approval, and those issues were litigated as part of the lawsuit.  Councilmember Ershadi suggested that having an expert examine the  plan and findings would give the City and residents an extra layer of  protection. She asked about how liability would work in the event the  drinking water source becomes contaminated. City Attorney McAnany  explained there are several mechanisms, including revoking  development permits or criminal or civil actions. Councilmember Ershadi  asked for the language to be specified in the agreement. McAnany  pointed out this would require changing the agreement that was  approved by the former Council.     Councilmembers Bailey and Derasary asked for clarity regarding the  process required with a major change. Councilmember Derasary also  asked about storm water retention and discharge from the site.    Councilmember Knuteson‐Boyd asked about square‐footage of the  casitas. City Attorney McAnany responded that the sizes of the hotel  rooms and casita homes were described and approved in the original  concept.     Councilmember Derasary asked about the source of the traffic studies  completed in 2014. Planner Reinhart stated he had just received more  recent information. It was determined that the 2014 studies were  provided by the Bureau of Land Management. Interim City Manager  Everitt clarified for the public that the documents being referred to are  available on the City’s digital archive at moabcity.org under Lionsback  Library  (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B3xcEVsVfLMOTmw4NkI2Sm9 JUms). Council suggested correspondence be added to the Library.                                                                                                                      Page 8 of 295 February 1, 2017   Page 4 of 5      Citizens then asked questions about the project.    The first question, from an unidentified citizen, concerned traffic on the  Sand Flats Road and how that would be managed. City Engineer  Bowman explained that the City has requested an update to the  previous traffic study, taking into account current traffic counts and to  expand the area of analysis to include related streets and routes.     The second question was from resident Kelly Green about drinking  water quality and impacts on his property’s spring.     Citizen Bill Love asked whether, in view of SITLA’s threat of rejecting the  City’s land use code, the developer will be asked to confirm his  commitment to the land use code or will he default on his pre‐ annexation agreement. He asked what are the ramifications if he  defaults on the pre‐annexation agreement and the plat agreement. City  Attorney McAnany answered that he could not know what the  developer and SITLA will do.     A resident asked about the eighteen employee housing units planned,  and how that compares to the eventual number of resort employees.  Planner Reinhart did not know the answer and stated that this topic has  not yet been addressed.     Castle Valley Mayor Dave Erley mentioned that many residents of Castle  Valley drink from Matrimony Spring, which is downstream from this  development, and he shares Mr. Green’s concerns. He specifically  mentioned the car wash and vehicle repair and maintenance amenity,  and pointed out the description is different in the water source  protection plan, and the impacts would be different. He mentioned the  highly‐fractured and delicate nature of the landscape over the aquifer.    John Andrews, legal counsel for SITLA, then spoke. He pointed out the  approved planning agreement mentions the fifty‐unit lodge is described  as condominium units and not rooms. He admitted there is ambiguity,  and that former City Manager Donna Metzler required the developer to  specify the units are larger than hotel‐room size. He then stated the  developer spent half a million dollars developing the plans for the  condominium‐sized units and the developer feels the City has now  reversed its position. Andrews stated he feels the developer has an  entitlement to proceed. He stated his concern that the water quality  issue, among others, may be reopened for review.                                                                                                                        Page 9 of 295 February 1, 2017   Page 5 of 5      Councilmember Ershadi asked about the origin of the communication  from Donna Metzler and Andrews stated it was in an email dated April  2, 2014. Ershadi asked to see the communication and asked if Metzler  had the authority to make the decision without planning staff  involvement. Andrews clarified that it was from City Planner Jeff  Reinhart and then read the email aloud.    City Attorney McAnany reiterated that the project was carefully  reviewed initially and that there are valid entitlements and if the  developer wanted to go forward with his original plan, he could. He also  pointed out that there is agreement that there are ambiguities in some  of the original approval documents from 2007. He pointed out specific  instances where the development referred to fifty rooms with parking  for fifty rooms, and he pointed out there was a dispute at the time  about that. He took issue with the assertion that the developer  reasonably relied in good faith on statements by staff that a 150‐room  complex was authorized.     Councilmember Bailey moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember  Derasary seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 1:40 PM.   APPROVED: __________________   ATTEST: ___________________ David L. Sakrison                              Rachel E. Stenta Mayor                                              City Recorder                                                   ADJOURNMENT     Page 10 of 295   February 8, 2017  Page 1 of 2  MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ‐‐ DRAFT  SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING February 8, 2017 The Moab City Council held a Special Workshop Meeting on the above  date in the Council Chambers at the Moab City Center, located at 217  East Center Street, Moab, Utah. A recording of the meeting is archived  at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html. Mayor Dave Sakrison called the Workshop to order at 2:30 PM.  In  attendance were Councilmembers Rani Derasary, Heila Ershadi, Tawny  Knuteson‐Boyd, and Kyle Bailey.  Also in attendance were Interim City  Manager David Everitt, City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Rachel  Stenta, City Engineer Phillip Bowman, Community Services Director Amy  Weiser, Film Commission Director Bega Metzner, Interim Police Chief  Steve Ross, and Parks, Recreation, and Trails Director Tif Miller.       The Workshop presented the upcoming Budget Amendment. Interim  City Manager Everitt opened the meeting.     City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Stenta presented revenue  information to the Council. Revenues are up, aligning with increased  visitation to Arches National Park. She noted that building permits are  also up.     Interim City Manager Everitt then outlined the highlights of the budget  amendment items and answered questions from Council. Highlights  included payout of former City Manager, proposed new positions, space  planning for City offices, renovations to the MARC, and Human Resource  and Recorder expenses.     Mayor Sakrison asked about Enterprise Funds.     Interim City Manager Everitt continued on with further highlights,  including the need for consultants in Engineering and Legal.    Councilmember Ershadi asked about evaluating the performance of the  City Attorney. Interim City Manager Everitt offered that an evaluation is  proposed to be built‐in to the renewal of contracts going forward.  Councilmember Bailey stated he was not able to evaluate the City    SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING  & ATTENDANCE                       WORKSHOP                                                             Page 11 of 295   February 8, 2017  Page 2 of 2  Attorney’s performance regarding the former City Manager.  Councilmember Derasary asked if the City could explore how other cities  and towns evaluate their counsel. Councilmember Ershadi mentioned  the recent Arches B&B case, and cited consistent issues with not doing  performance reviews. Discussion ensued about the choice of having  legal services under contract or as an appointed position.     Councilmember Bailey asked about budget implications regarding Utah  State University (USU). Interim City Manager Everitt, Mayor Sakrison,  and City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Stenta discussed USU, the  State and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA), Grand  County, and the Community Impact Board (CIB) with regard to City  commitments and expectations.     Interim City Manager Everitt continued with the budget review and  discussed capital projects, enterprise funds, and bids that came in over  budget with regard to the Waste Water Treatment Plant.    Councilmember Bailey moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember  Knuteson‐Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 4‐0 with  Councilmembers Bailey, Knuteson‐Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary voting  aye. The meeting was adjourned at 3:50 PM.   APPROVED: __________________   ATTEST: ___________________ David L. Sakrison                              Rachel E. Stenta Mayor                                              City Recorder                 50:34                              ADJOURNMENT   Page 12 of 295 MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING Agendaltem #: 6-1 Title: Special Event License and Special Use of Swanny City Park for the Southeast Utah Health Department to conduct the 2017 Moab Farmer's Market on Fridays from May through October. Fiscal Impact: Minimal. Staff Presenter(s): Amy Weiser, Community Services Director Department: Community Services Applicant: Southeast Utah Health Department - Orion Rogers Background/Summary: The Southeast Utah Health Department is requesting approval to conduct their weekly Farmer's Market at Swanny City Park on selected Friday evenings from May through October. In previous years the weekly market has been conducted with no major issues. This event does not require law enforcement or other logistical support. The Special Events Committee has reviewed the application and supporting material and recommends approval of the event and use of the park with conditions. The Southeast Utah District Health Department has requested a waiver of the special event and park use fees. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Approval of the Special Business Events License and Special Use of Swanny City Park with the following conditions: 1)Applicant will provide an updated vendors list each week one day prior to the event; 2)Applicant will keep the event confined to the park area indicated on the submitted application; 3)Applicant will actively inform participants and vendors of the Park Policy regarding no dogs or other animals in Swanny City Park. 4)There will be no vehicles parked on the lawn. 5)Organizer will communicate with the Parks Superintendent concerning electrical needs for the event. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve the applications for the 2017 Moab Farmers' Market with the staff conditions as presented" and "I move to approve/deny the fee waiver request." Attachment(s): Cover Letter for Fee Waiver Special Business Event License Application Special Use of Swanny City Park Application Supplementary material submitted by the applicant Page 13 of 295 Page 14 of 295SOUTHEAST UTAH HEALTH DEPARTMENT www.seuhealth.com 28 South 100 East• P.O. Box 800 Price, Utah, 84501 (435) 637 -3671 • Fax: (435) 637 -1933 Dave Cunningham. R.N., M.S.N. Dottie Ftemett. R.N. Health Director Nursing Director To Whom it May Concern, 575 S. Kane Creek Blvd. • P.O. Drawer E Moab, Utah, 84532 (435) 259-5602 • Fax: (435) 259-7369 Bradon Bradford. M.S.P.H. Environmental Health Director 25 West Main • P.O. Box 644 Castle Dale, Utah 84513 (435) 381-2252 • Fax: (435) 381-5635 Tracy Randall Budget and Accounting Off,cer 1/17/17 I am writing on behalf of the Moab Farmers' Market to ask for a waiver of all fees for the 2017 season. The 2016 season was a great success and we were able to come very close to breaking even and we project that this will be the case for the 2017 season. That being said ifthe 2017 fees are not waived by the city it will be difficult, if not impossible for the Market to be financially sound which will result in its demise. Exciting news for the 2017 season is that the market is moving to Friday evenings to be able to team up with the Moab Folk Festival for a Concert Series in July, which received $16,700 in funding from the Grand County Travel Council. These funds are completely separate from the Market itself. Besides the concert series we also plan to have local and traveling artists play each market of the season. This is made possible by Moab Gear Trader's music sponsorship of $100+ per week. I would like to thank the City Council for their support this year and in years past! Sincerely, Orion Rogers Page 15 of 295CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT Fee: $200.00 PLUS (CHECK ONE): SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION a TRANSIENT ($90): DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT No.: 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 OR a CURRENT CITY OR COUNTY LICENSE (ATTACH COPY) TOTAL FEES: PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB LICENSE#: ----ZONE: NAME OF EVENT: DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: Jv{u5l:..c_ LOCATION OF EVENT: PREMISES TO BE USED: TEMPORARY STRUCTURES TO BE USED (IFANY}: _,..C:.:..../._/'J_C-'-F'):-'-'-2=-$""'----------------------------DATE(S) AND TiME(S) OF EVENT: Pl"',(~ 1-~ ~ f 11 A (..,\i t D ANTICIPATED# OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: 5 D -9-0 {.) NUMBER OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING: =5,,_-__,';t.._5....__ ________ _ TYPES OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN EVENT: EXPLAIN FEES GENERATED BY THE EVENT (I.E. ADMISSION CHARGES, BOOTH FEES, RENTAL CHARGES, ETC.): -#-J.,.J~O'--'!_N'-"-'i-'"-~°'i._ ..... t:_.t__,,ie....-_______ _ ;JI S:o ,ANNVJ'<L \.?~N1:t>~ r-EE ..!,.. fQJ',, uei0·.-sur)P :S'.Yt<,.i$ tJH't.c\.+1'.U'iQ... .:r:~ L.'i,5-:.. EvENTSPONSOR'SNAME: S0tJ·n~tJ4i1tQ..w t..:-1-(1.\ '[)~:5r1.2.~.,... H~A L'n-\ SPONSOR'S ADDRESS: > ~ S 5. I< A >J l. (. ~z ~ CITY: },-( 0 A ~ SPONSOR'S DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY: )J/A SPONSOR'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: tJIA TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: r:J PROPRIETORSHIP D PARTNERSHIP D CORPORATION OlJOTHER (SPECIFY}: *EVENT SPONSOR'S SALES TAX ID#: NIA-. NAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: .,_ lS~V "'1,,1 ) } ~ YT PHONE: t../ 3S -"Z.5':'.\ -'5 b Oc_ STATE: J i ZIP: r;' l/ ':-7 2 DATE OF BIRTH: WLALTu It/A THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE 1ssuANcE oF A ucENsE w1LL BE DELAYED. ~t.f~ Drrr I/WE So VTf/zkJ<J2.}'J ~ /! \7.I:'ST. HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY PLEASE PRINT NAME s BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. I/WE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON-TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION P 0R ';:, E AGREE TO FILE THE PROPER REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH. /-l~-1'1-Date ,· State of Utah ) } ss County of Grand ) l \. SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 15' day of ()Q~o~Cj , ....W..1 ,--... .............................. .... SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT! JAMIE HULCE Notary Public State of Utalt Comm. No. 662071 My Comm. Explr11 FIii 2, 2017 Page 16 of 295Moab Farmers Market Dates 5/5/2017 5/12/2017 5/19/2017 5/26/2017 6/2/2017 6/9/2017 6/16/2017 6/23/2017 6/30/2017 7/7/2017 In conjunction with Free Concert Series 7/14/2017 In conjunction with Free Concert Series 7/21/2017 In conjunction with Free Concert Series 7/28/2017 Jn conjunction with Free Concert Series 8/4/2017 8/11/2017 8/18/2017 8/25/2017 9/1/2017 9/8/2017 9/15/2017 9/22/2017 9/29/2017 10/6/2017 10/13/2017 10/20/2017 10/27/2017 Page 17 of 295-. \ .. Moab Farmers Market list of Potential Vendors 1 2 3 Brain Freeze Abuelitas Salitas Andrea Grace Andrea Organics Becky Thomas Blue Sky Designs Castle V Farms Castle Valley Herbs Charleton Lemonaid Colorado Peaches Cora Shanie Country Store Deals CV Creamery Desert Sunset Desert Valley Bath Bombs Drew R Division of Wild life Dunham Farms Early Morning Orchard Exquisit Container Gardens Frieka Hatherton KaadzBeadz & Gardens Kaki's Kitchen Kaycees Creations Knowels La Donna Laura Kamril Lula Roe Martina Medino Moab Soap and Soul Native American Club Persephonie Roan Creek Ranch Sassy Q's Pops S. Sidwell Originals Silver Bear (Drop in) Sister Root Smokin Pots Sundial Medicinals Tech Zen Youth Garden Rim rock Studios Angela Peterson Vick Bruno Zinzi Baked Goods Page 18 of 295City of Moab APPLICATION FOR THE SPECIAL USE OF CITY PARKS Swanny Park, located, between 100 and 200 West from 30 to 400 North, is a non-reservation park that is meant to be open to the public on a first-come, first served basis. Special Use of Swanny Park and other non-reservation parks within the City is subject to approval by the Moab City Council. The City Council may approve use applications for events that provide clear benefits to the community. Requests for usage by private businesses that serve a limited clientele will not be approved. This application must be submitted, along with any special events license application, to the City Recorder's office at least six weeks prior to the scheduled event. Upon approval of the application by the City Council, a Special Park Use Permit will be issued upon payment of the appropriate fee, provided for in the Schedule of Fees. PLEASE PRINT OR FILL ELECTRONICALLY Applicant Information Name ofperson Responsible for Use of Park: QP-"!...Dt-.l it D(q: I;?....-., I Soi Ji""/J, .::.Jf.-1, Tf~ N JtA )-1. ()r5 \ t:!21~ L-TI-l 1).£-; Name of Organization and Event if applicable: 5on T\\f Jl.'5T;f e;w.J 1 , .,,a. \1-'D.r ~ 14 ~A';,.,.~ D.!..t?"r Address: 5?_S ,S:. 1<:'~JJi. C.2~(.\4 tv..oJ/r 13-D-r ~y~~2.. Day Phone: 4is >$" Sbo z.. Email: a .-~..,,:C~ c£ 1)-l-c;,. ~ :Jo" Proposed Park Usage Information Which park to you intend to use? Swanny Park: 1-Other (please indicate name of park~·--------Please indicate the proposed datEJ.s and times of use: Proposed Start Date: tit:rrn-lV1'li Start Tlme: a am/~ End Time: ~0 __ am/~ 011\ Fi2-TDA'r') Proposed End Date: Ql."("01)'2. K.. Start Time: am/pm End Time: am/pm Please specify what areas of the park are proposed for use:_-'$_.,.O'""'y"""t'f" .... -_._\l_"i,.,._A:_·...a·:$'"""~-=-----"'C""'O---'~__.,N-"-~=~ .... \~--'-------For Swanny Park, please show in detail on the attached diagrams, which areas of the park are proposed to be used. Show locations of all structures and facilities. Number of participants you expect: S":;;;25 Je~umber of spectators that you expect: Su· C.oo Please describe structures, tents, canopies, portable restrooms, etc. that you propose to set up at the park: CA-~o\>!:t;s l4k/l.'.l T.:::,tJA.-s, \i.. ~ r A-r rorJS Will amplification be required for your event? Yes J\ No __ _ Please specify any electrical needs for your event: \'-i\_O ~!.Li ~oo t> ,~ vL'<'. Please describe the parking and traffic plan for your event. Location of parking, sign age, traffic control devices, use of volunteers, etc. should be described. /\JoN<i... s \:\OIJ Lt> 13 2 Al~~ ti 2 D 'Bi 'ION '.t> Nof3..MA L ;m<-is;i-fA ~1<-rJJ6 If you anticipate any street closures for your event, please describe below, and show on the accompanying diagram. M' PLEASE COMPLETE OTHER SIDE Page 19 of 295Do you intend for the park to be open to the public during your event? Yes ___.:X_:____ NO---For non-Swanny Park events: Do you plan to charge for admission to the park? Yes ___ No __ _ Please describe any security or crowd control measures you plan for use of the park: o,v 'i. For groups over 100 people, please describe your refuse control and recycling plan: iJS:N'\ ;c:~ .DJAt>5 c21Jt:4T~ vf~J\)(;O..~ A~-s: ~ (loN 5:r. 81.-~ Rn~ "4-!..S..-... o'Lt~'& D.:!".:5"1 Please describe your clean-up plan during and after the event: A 1~i ,). Aw ;c. s o v ~ Q... 5 ( >'HJ A-1'.J 't) W A-l.iL. p Ii Q. l.e... (A OeL \..: 1r>c.. t:)<..K"S µ._ --.;P'-'---'--"e-.==---<~----"=-='--'""-"c...::;..,._::__--""....:..:'----"-~;;:;....:;__;=;_..;.....:......:=-...--'-....:...:-=...:::=--c"-""':....o.i...,'-""'"--'-'~=,..J -~ Please describe your restroom facility plan: 1J51, f'.R,wrS>1.Q 0Q.,Nb -rN cl>li.M.!:.c1i, Other Information Please describe how your organization, your event, and/or your use of the park will provide broad-based benefits to the community: ,fk M oA 0 I=' A (.).JV),~ ¥-S "4 A-a. H ti~ Please specify and describe other community or city facilities that you plan to use: Have you applied for a Special Event Permit for this use? Yes..)S.._.__. No __ Will you be able to provide proof of insurance, showing the City as an additional insured? Yes ..,L_ No --1 certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct. I agree to abide by the City of Moab Parks Policies and any condif sat ach this permit. Signature of Contact Pe( Date: 1-\Z.. -\ }-Office Use Only Public Works Review: __ Police Department Review: __ Administrative Review: __ Park Use Fee: __ Date Fee Paid: __ Date of City Council Approval: __ Insurance Received: __ Final Set up Diagram Received: __ Special Conditions or Requirements: Other Required Permits and Approvals Page 20 of 295r SwannyPark 400 Non'// S/1eel I Aquatic Center Outdoor Swimming Pools Playground I 6 Covered Picnic Tables Paik Dn've t 100 50 0 100 ~ N SCALE ~ 1" 100' = I 200 i.J FEET To Main St. One Block L MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 28, 201z Agenda. ltem #: 6-2 Title: Special Business Event License and Special Use of Swanny City Park for the 2017 Moab Free Concert Series to be held in July at the Friday Farmers Market. Fiscal Impact: Minimal. Staff Presenter(s): Amy Weiser, Community Services Director Department: Community Services Applicant: Moab Folk Festival - Melissa Schmaedick Background/Summary: The Moab Folk Festival worked closely with the Southeast Utah Health Department to propose free concerts at the 2017 Moab Farmers Market. These free concerts will be held at Swanny City Park on selected Friday evenings in July from 5:30-8:30pm; specifically 7/7, 7/14, 7/21, and 7/28. This is a collaboration with the Moab Farmer's Market to stimulate attendance at the market. The Special Events Committee has reviewed the application and supporting material and recommends approval of the event and use of the park with conditions. The Moab Folk Festival is requesting a waiver of the special event and park use fees. The applicant is requesting approvals for a beer garden within the concert venue with beer proposed to be sold by Moab Brewery and Bohemian Brewery. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1)Organizer will communicate with the Parks Superintendent concerning staking and electrical needs for the event. 2)Applicant will keep the event confined to the park area indicated on the submitted application. 3)Applicant will actively inform participants and vendors of the Park Policy regarding no dogs or other animals in Swanny City Park. 4)There will be no vehicles parked on the lawn. 5)Applicant must comply with all DABC regulations. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve the applications for the 2017 Moab Free Concert Series with the staff conditions as presented" and "I move to approve/deny the fee waiver request." Attachment(s): Cover Letter for Fee Waiver Application for Special Use of Swanny City Park Special Business Event License Application Page 21 of 295 Page 22 of 295Park Alcohol Permit Application Retail Beer License Application Class IV Special Event Beer License Local Consent Page 23 of 295www.moabfolkfestival.com info@moabfolkfestival.com P.O. Box 1082 Moab, UT 84532 435-259-3198 (ph) • 435-259-1502 {fx) Dear Members of the Special Event Review Committee, We are requesting a waiving of permit and park-usage fees for the upcoming Moab Free Concert Series (MFCS), an event that the Moab Folk Festival is collaboratively producing in tandem with the Moab Farmers Market, the Moab Arts and Recreation Center, KZMU and Moab Gear Trader, and underwritten by the Moab Area Travel Council and Moab City. The MFCS will be held each Friday of July in conjunction with the Farmers Market, and will be free and open to the public. The purpose of the MFCS is multi-fold: it will stimulate attendance at the Farmers Market, thereby benefitting local vendors; it will provide a public good to our community; and, it will provide a cultural attraction for visitors to Moab in July. The MFCS has limited revenue generating opportunities, and the payment of fees would cut into underwriting funds secured for the purpose of producing the series. Currently, other than the funds received from the Moab Area Travel Council, the Moab City, and the producing organizations, revenue generated to support MFCS will come from beer sales (if the pending license is granted). Because this is the first season of MFCS, we have no idea how much revenue such sales will generate. Therefore, our additional resources are unknown until production of the MFCS occurs. We hope that the success of the first season of the MFCS will lead to more funding support over time and eventually lead to a self-sustaining event. Until then, assistance from the Moab City in the form of waived fees would be greatly appreciated. We thank you in advance for your consideration of our request. Please feel free to contact us at the Moab Folk Festival office if you have any further questions (259-3198). Melissa Schmaedick Cassie Paup Page 24 of 295City of Moab APPLICATION FOR THE SPECIAL USE OF CITY PARKS Swanny Park, located, between 100 and 200 West from 30 to 400 North, is a non-reservation park that is meant to be open to the public on a first-come, first served basis. Special Use of Swanny Park and other non-reservation parks within the City is subject to approval by the Moab City Council. The City Council may approve use applications for events that provide clear benefits to the community. Requests for usage by private businesses that serve a limited clientele will not be approved. This application must be submitted, along with any special events license application, to the City Recorder's office at least six weeks prior to the scheduled event. Upon approval of the application by the City Council, a Special Park Use Permit will be issued upon payment ofthe appropriate fee, provided for in the Schedule of Fees. PLEASE PRINT OR FILL ELECTRONICALLY Applicant Information Name of Person Responsible for Use of Park: M~i ~So.. S"dAvii\0t:J·1 ciL Name of Organization and Event if applicable-: ~Tu!,.--'-1fu~&:-'-~"-r;-,,.~-l...,fVl,-/ o-tt....:.b-'-'::'fo~lft_.;....;..,,;R;;,-5"":h"-Vi-~...,..I-/..,.._ _______ _ Address: f D e,ef Joi 2---Mo ala UT 5i1+522 ' Day Phone: 2.91-3t'!S::/ Uo · qjby Email: ~{Y <? 1Moak, -folk .ps+rva I· l(Wi. Proposed Park Usage Information Which park to you intend to use? Swanny Park: L Other (please indicate name of park .... ·--------Please indicate the proposed dates and times of use: Proposed Start Date: 7(7/11 Start Time: .£"~o Proposed End Date: ~(z.'i/tJ Start Time: S-·. X> am/e@) End Time: Cf•-oo am/@ am@) End Time: q · · o CJ am/€) Please specify what areas of the park are proposed for use: __________________ _ For Swanny Park, please show in detail on the attached diagrams, which areas of the park are proposed to be used. Show locations of all structures and facilities. IO p_evf, t11ffS Number of participants you expect: ¢ 9tkff Number of spectators that you expect: 2.. S""U Please describe structures, tents, canopies, portable restrooms, etc. that you propose to set up at the park: M ~ a.lo Co VY\Wll,\.Vl r±y c;+a~, \)eev Sct!e~ Te~+-" Will amplification be required for your event? Yes )( No __ _ Please specify any electrical needs for your event: lA.t. will vtee~ e!e.c{-v, c,/~ J;v-fl,,( ~i,iJ ~o,:o,-) , , vi '>fvv. fVI evil> a.~ loee.v -/-en+-· ' Please describe the parking and traffic plan for your event. Location of parking, signage, traffic control devices, use of volunteers, etc. should be described. D l'1 Sfve d· ,Pa.Vt... 1Vl_j . W a. I ({ , Ill j c:i. "'-J b , k !Vl) lM ti be .e Vt C uvJr c;1. ~ J If you anticipate any street closures for your event, please describe below, and show on the accompanying diagram. () l\ PLEASE COMPLETE OTHER SIDE Page 10 of 26 Page 25 of 295Do you intend for the park to be open to the public during your event? Yes X NO---Do you intend to serve/sell alcohol {if so, additional requirements apply) Yes )( No __ _ For non-Swanny Park events: Do you plan to charge for admission to the park? Yes ___ No >I Please describe your restroom facility plan: IN( g(a.lA fv vl ft( ik (f .s:l:v®&i~ Other Information Please describe how your organization, your event, and/or your use of the park will provide broad-based benefits to the community: .{'M Jo e UJl\'\vvitvCDvrcevt vle.S 1/1 v,J [ovi ;Jv(V1Chovr w1f{1. -/1J.R Moab liwvv,,et,,} Mo.i.&/1~ We WI II OV'.>v rlP MR e VtVifs I fJ Ju/ I fl e1Ah lo , · mr.-, .J-Please specify and describe other community or city facilities that you plan to use: n a. Have you applied for a Special Event Permit for this use? Yes__,_X'---No __ Will you be able to provide proof of insurance, showing the City as an additional insured? Yes X No---I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct. I agree to abide by the City of Moab Parks Policies and any conditions attached to this permit. Signature of Contact Person: ~ Date: ___,_?--+/-'--+-{-17..___ Office Use Only Public Works Review:__ Police Department Review: __ _ Administrative Review: __ Park Use Fee: ___ Date Fee Paid: Date of City Council Approval: __ Insurance Received: __ Final Set up Diagram Received: __ Special Conditions or Requirements: Other Required Permits and Approvals Page 11 of 26 Page 26 of 295SwannyPark \._ _____ ,; L 400 NoJth Street ("('_"1~ r·-------~1..J c:1· 1 ; I 0...-i I Aquatic Center ! i I I ~ L_l / Swimrpi11g ~~d~oor Pools--'/ ~, __ __, D Playground I i ParkOrive \OOH-~~z;:;: 1 ~) ~ r e Fa_r1v;ers fvic:tru-1-6 Covered Picnic Tables d e a T l 100 50 __ 0 10_0 ___ 2_,00 ~ SCALE 111 = 100· FEET Page 12of26 To Main St. One Block --:::. S\:'.:-1 t.l"'c.•l'lj w/ Y'.:l ·,""' i.,., nba.r S'~c.«.S. . Page 27 of 295THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 13 of 26 Page 28 of 295CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT FEE: $200.00 DATEPAJD: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT No.: SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB PLUS ( CHECK ONE): [j TRANSIENT ($90): OR [j CURRENT CITY OR COUNTY LICENSE (ATTACH COPY) TOTAL FEES: LICENSE#: ___ _ ZONE: ----NAMEOFEVENT: (v\ oa.6 1ve.e (oVIC-€f-1' S"ev·i e> DESCRIPTIONOFEVEN'f: 1Y€lV~HfrJ rtVir>~ tVfrl,/ £i~,i,,IJ. 1~1 Jli._li./ i't'I (o Vl.ju..ChvvJ t,MfiA °EvMt'~~ £,\,\1J_vl1et-' , I . J ( ,J LOCATION OF EVENT: S' l,J av\ J11l/ Cuy Pa V l.(_ PREMISESTOBEUSED: S'f: eo>nc11 '01 .;Jo.ilc,. ttd-uuc~i./... Tu fCWv'vttv'<: (vletv/.Le,r' Csf'c'. r.co..p) TEMPORARYSTRUCTURESTOBEUSED(IFANY): /li[Dllb foWtl/v1I,H1JL S-rAQe. ee.v Tp1,,tf--, Sf1_{p fVJ(l /?l/J°,fu(U..vf o{ au.Jltt,1[e DATE(S}ANDTIME(S)OFEVENT: 7/7/17 / 7/1<+/11, ~/v/n:. ~h .. ¥/;7 5\3()~ ~·.30 J -pr eevsales Ccfl/,/vv/· ANTICIPATED# OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS:, 2.,5 0 NUMBER OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING: ---'------------'---TYPES OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN EVENT: ___ -'8..,__e~e~v~S:.,_. a,,,.·,.,;_.I €::.~£:.,,_. ~'B"'-"'o-"'o-'--t.,_,t ).:,_. -----------------------EXPlAIN FEES GENERATED BYTHE EVENT (I.E. ADMISSION CHARGES, BOOTI-l FEES, RENTAL CHARGES, ETC.): to ,f}CLl.f 1bv il,.p vevloYwl.tlA 0.1.AJ £(A).k~J 'X'V vl ces EVENT SPONSOR'S NAME: PHoNE: zroo, qq0L{ SPONSOR'S ADDRESS: 2Llo s_ "2 ... oo E: CITY: tl{ 0 CW STATE: itT ZIP: gJ.,:;; ~ z. SPONSOR'S DRlVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY: UT-P L, L SPONSOR'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: ,,.. _________ _ DATE OF BIRTH: TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: D PROPRIEIQBfili!P O PARTNEBSHIR .. CORPORATION D0THER (SPECIFY): EVENT SPONSOR'S SAlES TAX I~~ iAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: llovi PYC! fi +-· THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE Will BE ISSUED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNlAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. /'' , I • ,me M .e, Lt .s $ o... "'.:> v VI \'Y\ '11. ~ q\_ i • c1.-L HEREBY AGREE To coNoucT sA1 o sus1NEss sTR!CTL y 1N AccoRDANcE w1TH THE M oAB c1TY PLEASE PRINT NAME(s) State of Utah ) ) ss County of Grand ) SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 7 ,P NOTARY PUBLIC' SEE BACK OF FORM Page 14 of 26 NOTARY PUBLIC CHRIS MANNEL 672497 COMMISS10N EXPIRES NOVEMBER 26, 2017 STATE OF UTAH Page 29 of 295ATTACH LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OPERATING UNDER THIS LICENSE. ATTACH SITE PLAN FOR THE EVENT GROUNDS (IF APPLICABLE). / ATTACH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDICATED BELOW: LICENSE APPROVALS CITY STAFF a APPROVED a DISAPPROVED REASON(S):. ______________________________ _ LICENSE ExPIRATION DATE:-------SIGNATURE OF CITY STAFF MOAB CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL REQUIRED D No D Yes AGENDA DATE: _____ _ a APPROVED C] DISAPPROVED REASON(s):. ______________________________ _ EVENT COST RECOVERY SURCHARGE:------SPECIAL CONDITIONS:. ___________________________ _ 07101/05 Page 15 of26 Page 30 of 295THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 17 of 26 Page 31 of 295City of Moab Park Alcohol Permit Application and Checklist A Park Alcohol Permit may be granted if the City Recorder certifies that the applicant meets the conditions on the following checklist. The Applicant should complete the information on this form and submit the form along with the Park Use Application and the Special Business Event License Application. Applicant is responsible to abide by all applicable terms and conditions of this permit and all other required permits and approvals. Upon successful completion of all items on this checklist, the City Recorder will certify completion and issue the permit. PLEASE PRINT Applieant lnfermatien Name of Person Responsible for Use of Park: Me-Ii~ S-o.. c;:kVVlae J, ck., Name of Organization and Event if applicable-: _rv_1_e_111_,d_s_a_C.,....-J1A_o_a_b_.c..1i-=-111-----=1e:c-c-,h-·1;;-a-,-7..--------Address: ::P01:3o;;: 10~2-Moa0UT 9:{53z_.,. ~2~os 2,c,<'~ Moa.b,u,T S<l.i-SfZ. Day Phone: 254 3 1 q 8::: Email: 1 "'fv <i~12.a h fa 1/Lfe clv;,;I Date(s) of Event: 7'7 . 7 /,t./ , ?Ji-, , "fz... "i • I I I f Park Alcohol Permit Checklist (for internal use only) I certify that the event sponsor has completed all of the following approvals and is hereby issued a Park Alcohol Permit: D Event Sponsor has obtained approval for a State of Utah Single Alcohol Permit or Temporary Special Event Beer Permit (applicable permit is attached) D Event Sponsor has obtained approval for all applicable City of Moab alcohol licenses. D Event Sponsor has obtained approval for City of Moab Special Event License for the event. D Event Sponsor has obtained approval for a City of Moab Park Use Permit for the event. City Recorder's Signature ____________ _ Date ______ _ Page 21 of 26 Page 32 of 295DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT No.: CITY OF MOAB RETAIL BEER* LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB 0 CLASS I FEE: 0 CLASS II FEE: 0 PRIVATE CLUB D CLASS Ill FEE: 0 CLASS IV FEE: LICENSE#: $200.00 $200.00 $720.00 $90.00 $90.00 APPLICANT'S PERSONAL INFORMATION FULL NAME: f'll e Ii£ so. ScL,wvt7. e &trk HOME PHONE: 2w O. C?_'f 04-HOME ADDRESS: )-C( 0 S , 2.D O ~ C1TY: M oc:i_~ STATE: U.T ZIP: @-1-s ~ .l. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: DATE OF BIRTli: DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE: BUSINESS INFORMATION BUSINESS NAME: VVt ~ a.lti Ii { iL R-di V6!J / Moa!? nee Covirrd (el, j es BUSINESS ADDRESS: zqo £' 20 Q £ 7 t'Yloalo, U.T '6tf53:z-sALEsTAXID#: 1 '302?0 c:; lo· ooz s:rL BUSINESS PHONE: !.BS"· Z-91 · 3 ! '1' '6: Bus!NESS MAILING ADDRESS: To ~ ( O I z___. CITY: (l.A n ft0 STATE: Ut: ZIP: X,1.f'C;,32 WARNING!! ALL LICENSES, EXCEPT CLASS Ill, REQUIRE A STATE LICENSE! STATE APPROVAL COULD TAKE 30 DAYS OR MORE TO PROCESS! CONTACT THE STATE NOW! THIS APPLICATION IS MADE FOR A LICENSE TO SELL BEER* UNDER THE FOLLOWING LICENSE: (CHECK ONE) 0 CLASS I 0 CLASS II 0 PRIVATE CLUB 0 CLASS Ill ~CLASS IV Retail License shall entitle Licensee to sell Beer only on the premises licensed on draught and in original containers, for consumption on or off the premises, in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and the Ordinances of the City. Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer in the original containers, on the premises for consumption on the premises, in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and Ordinances of the City, and shall be issued solely to Restaurants, Cafes and other establishments whose primary purpose is the dispensing of food. Same conditions as Class I and Class II Beer Licenses. Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed in original containers, for consumption off the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and the Ordinances of the City. Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed on draught and in original containers, for consumption on the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and the Ordinances of the City limited to the dates specified. 1. Will you also serve liquor, wine or heavy beer (over 3.2% by weight)? F No DYES (Requires 'Local Consent' approved by City Council prior to State approval.) 2. List brands of beer proposed to be sold by the applicant within the City of Moab: Mm b '&-Pt~r1 u *Beer application is for 3.2% by weight only. Also requires a State license. 09/21/05 Page 22 of 26 Page 33 of 2953. 4. ~ve you ever been convicted of any offense other than a minor traffic violation? ~ No a YES (If yes, list offenses along with an explanation. Include locations and dates.) The Applicant MUST provide to the City of Moab a copy of the Criminal History Report from the State of Utah if required for Class I, II, Private Club and Class IV. Class Ill Applicants MUST contact the Moab City Police Department License Investigator as soon as possible to be fingerprinted and photographed. A background check is also required. THE FOLLOWING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS EXCEPT CLASS IV. PLEASE CALL AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT. HEAL TH INSPECTOR (435) 259-5602 575 Kane Creek Blvd DATE OF INSPECTION ______ _ APPROVED CJ DISAPPROVED CJ REASON: SIGNATURE MOAB CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: _____ _ 0APPROVED CJ DISAPPROVED REASON{S):. ______________________________ _ SPECIAL CONDITIONS:. ___________________________ _ Page 23of 26 Page 34 of 295RETAIL BEER LICENSE APPLICATION Submit completed application and attachments to the City Treasurer for processing. The applicant represents that they possess all the qualifications of a licensee as set forth in Section 32, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 and that they will faithfully comply with and have faithfully complied with the Utah Liquor Control Act. This application is submitted to the City of Moab as an inducement for the issuance of a retailer's business beer license in accordance with Section 32, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953. The undersigned applicant hereby agrees and promises that if such beer license is granted, the applicant will faithfully comply with all provisions of the Utah Liquor Control Act and regulations of the Utah Liquor control Commission adopted pursuant thereto, and the ordinances of the City of Moab, and in particular that they will faithfully comply with Section 32, Chapter 6 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 relating to reporting and payment of excise tax, and with regulation 4 relating to advertising, regulation 4·A relating to labeling and advertising, and regulation 5 relating to unfair competition and unlawful practice. Applicant's Signature STATE OF UTAH } : ss COUNTY OF GRAND ) r<\e,\,-:,;c_ St~V\l\c...-e.&t.l<. , being first duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says: That he/she is the applicant above named; that he /she has read the foregoing application, and knows and understands the contents thereof; that the same is true to his/her own knowledge. Subscribed and sworn to before me on this .:I__ day of__,__~ ...... e,:;..:;:\,;....;f,_\l:.._c-._:)---------l,__ ______ , 'lo q. NOTARY PUBLIC CHRIS MANNEL 672497 :: COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 26, 2017 STATE OF UTAH Page 24 of26 a-~ Notary Public Page 35 of 2951. CLASS IV SPECIAL EVENT BEER LICENSE SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATON 2. Please provide a floor plan or detailed description of the following: a.. The sites from which you propose that beer be sold or served, including all dispensing points. Dispensing points include storage areas, booths, tables, bars, and other areas set apart for the _ sale of beer; b. The areas in which you propose that beer be allowed to be consumed; 3. Please state the purpose of the association or entity conducting the event: / '.tiad; {J :'eV, e~ ~ % fl f t[:rt:+ ~w~n>iv l)o_y~ 4. I M~l l~.50 Sckmt1eo\.1c,i(_ hereby grant Moab City Officials, including but not limited to, Jaw enforcement officers or City code enforcement officials, an unrestricted right to enter the premises of this event, during the event to take place on 1z. 7t4 %,,122';' starting at 5: 30 PM, and located at Swann,( (Jrb ,Pa.rlt for pu~;s~s of monitoring compliance with all license terms I and City ordinances. SIGNED:-~ DATE: ;;J t(n STATE OF UTAH ) ) ss COUNTY OF GRAND ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME BY _M_e_\_\_5.a.,.5°'_._ __ 5..;.._,;t. ..... ~ ____ 'M._..cc...o-...c..:,c..:;c_J:._\_c..._k. _______ oN THIS__:]____ DAY OF __.:6 ...... e ...... \o ..... c_\)_t-_3--------' 1.,0 \1 . • NOTARYPUBUC CHAIS MANNa. 672497 COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 26, 2017 STATE OF UTAH Page 25 of 26 Page 36 of 295CITY OF MOAB INFORMED CONSENT AND RELEASE OF LIABILITY In connection with my application for a Beer License with Moab City, I hereby authorize the forenamed agency as well as the Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification to investigate my past and present work, education, and law enforcement records to ascertain any and all information, which may be pertinent to licensing regulations. I do hereby release all person, firms, agencies, companies, groups or installations, whomsoever, from any damages of/or resulting from release shall function as an original. ·-I~ Signature of Applicant Signature of Witness State of Utah County of Gfo..J ) § ) Md.,rssvi 5okrv,.adn:k.... Print Name of Applicant Print Name of Witness , personally appeared before me :J./1 /t7 date Date On the _l __ day of fe-b N °':ff .....,M'---'-'i:::..\..:..\_S5~~--'---"5---=e,_V\_M_O\._e.cl_\_c_·~---' who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. otaryP~c My Commission Expires:~ov. 1.J.J, -Z..0\1 Residing in: (b(Q\(\d Page 26 of 26 NOTARY PUBLIC CHRIS MANNEL ff 672497 : COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 26, 2017 STATE OF UTAH County Page 37 of 295SINGLE EVENT PERMIT Local Consent PURPOSE: Local business licensing authority provides written consent to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission to issue an event permit to an organization for the purposes of storage, sale, offer for sale, furnish, or allow the consumption of an alcoholic product on the event premises AUTHORITY: Utah Code 32B-9-201 ' [ ] City [ ] Town [ ] County Local business license authority hereby grants its consent to the issuance of a temporary single event permit license to: Applicant Entity/Organization: -r::;,evtJ, 6EV\4oo.b fo Ju. f:es-hva_ f Event Name: /lit oaki 1vce Cc1v\.ce~t ~dies. Event location address: c+oo N [QO W MQ(l,k u.r S?J.532_ stroet city stale zip On the day(s) of . dales -moolh )=I" during the hours of , pursuant to the provision of Utah Code 32B-9. defined hours from -to We recommend this entity as conducting a civic or community enterprise* [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not providing a recommendation *As Part of local consent required by 32B..S.201(1)(c), the locality may provide a recommendation as to whether the entity Is conducting a civic or community enterprise. A civic or community enterprise means a function that is in the nature of a temporary special event such as a social, business, religious, political, governmental, educational, recreational, cultural, charitable, athletic, theatrical, scholastic, artistic, or scientific event. A "civic or community enterprise" generally is a gathering that brings members of a community together for the common good. Single event permits may not be issued to or obtained by an entity or organization for the purpose of avoiding or attempting to avoid the requirement of state retail alcohol licensing. Authorized Signature Name/Title Date This is a suggested formal A locally produced city, town, or county form is acceptable. AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2015, LOCAL CONSENT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE DABC BY THE APPLICANT. MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEET NG Agendaltem #: 6-3 Title: Approval of Special Business Event Licenses for the 2017 Skinny Tire Festival to be held March 11-14, 2017 Fiscal Impact: Law enforcement services are needed to support this event. Staff Presenter(s): Amy Weiser, Community Services Director Department: Administration Applicant: Skinny Tire Events, LLC - Beth Logan Background/Summary: The City Special Events Committee has reviewed the Special Event Business License for the 2017 Skinny Tire Festival. We have conferred with the coordinator for the event and are of the opinion that all issues with the event have been adequately addressed. The event organizers are coordinating with City and County Public Safety Departments to address all logistical issues. This event has been conducted successfully for numerous years. This event brings many visitors to our community. The Special Events Committee recommends approval of the Special Business Event License Application for the 2017 Skinny Tire Festival. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve the special event application for the 2017 Skinny Tire Festival." Attachment(s): Special Business Event License Application with Attachments Page 38 of 295 Page 39 of 295DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT No.: NAME OF EVENT: /-/7-/J ;2.. oo~ CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAsT CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 2594135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB SKINNY TIRE FESTIVAL -ROAD CYCLING EVENT SPECIAL EVENT FEE: PLUS (CHECK ONE): a TRANSIENT ($90): ,,w[ OR If' CURRENT CITY OR CoUNTY LICENSE (ATTACH COPY) TOTAL FEES: $200.00 ~ OD. ou LICENSE#: __ C_'f __ ZONE: --=-+--DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: SUPPORTED ROAD CYCLING EVENT ON AREA ROADS BENEFITTING THE MOAB CANCER TREATMENT CENTER LOCATION OF EVENT: ARCHWAY INN, 1551 N. RIVERVIEW DRIVE, MOAB PREMISES TO BE USED: ARCHWAY INN HOTEL, AREA ROADWAYS AND BIKE PATH TEMPORARY STRUCTURES TO BE USED (IF ANY): POP UP TENTS AT AID STATIONS, ROAD SIGNS INDICATING DIRECTION OF TRAVEL DATE(S} AND TIME(S) OF EVENT: MARCH 11M14, 2017 ANTICIPATED # OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: 499 NUMBER OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING: _N_O_N_E _________ _ TYPES OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN EVENT: NONE ExPLAIN FEES GENERATED BY THE EVENT (I.E. ADMISSION CHARGES, BOOTH FEES, RENTAL CHARGES, ETC.}: REGISTRATION $90,.$190 EVENT SPONSOR'S NAME: SKINNY TIRE EVENTS, LLC PHONE: _43_>_2_&_o-a __ a_a_9 __ SPONSOR'S ADDRESS: POBOX934 CITY: MOAB STATE: UT ZIP: 84532 ---------TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: C] PROPRIETORSHIP XX PARTNERSHIP D CORPORATION 00THER (SPECIFY): --------------EVENT SPONSOR'S SAlES TAX ID #: NIA NAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: --------------CoNTACTEMAILADDRESS: _____ BETH@SKINNYTIREEVENTS.COM. __________ _ THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT.LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. r.L ]NIE B ~PRiNT~) 6-A HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CoDE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. !NIE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON• "TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION (SPONSOR). IN/ GREE TO FILE THE PROPER REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH. l/J-Ca/J7 State of Utah ) } ss County of Grand ) /A.,!. I SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this....._"'""1 __ day of _}et.11t4ar{ I ~R'-~~ N li-f PUBLIC SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDmONAl REQUIREMENT! Rev. 3130/2016 Page 40 of 295ATTACH LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OPERATING UNDER THIS LICENSE. ATTACH SITE PLAN FOR THE EVENT GROUNDS (IF APPLICABLE). ATTACH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDICATED BELOW: LICENSE APPROVALS CITY STAFF [] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED REASON{S): ______________________________ _ LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: ______ _ SIGNATURE OF CITY STAFF MOAB CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL REQUIRED a No {] Yes AGENDA DATE: _____ _ [] APPROVED [] DISAPPROVED REASON(S): ______________________________ _ EVENT COST RECOVERY SURCHARGE:------SPECIAL CONDITIONS:. ___________________________ _ 07/01/05 Page 41 of 295Skinny Tire Festival 2017 -SITE MAP Cyclists begin and finish recreational tour each day from Archway Inn Hotel. This is a Site Map of what we do on the private property owned by Archway Inn Hotel. Please see Route Map for area roads cyclists travel upon. --North Highway 191 Frontage Road Start/Finish Sat, Sun, Mon, Tuesday -I -I _____ Archway Inn Hotel Lobby _ _, Cyclists Check In, Receive Wristbands, Receive Rider Packet, etc. Hotel Courtyard -Location of Festival Celebration Saturday, March 11, 2-5pm Only Guest Speakers, Top Fundraisers Acknowledged COMMUNICATIONS Angee Baune 303-359-8088 ACOEWl Ham Radio Mark Griffith -260-2334 Beth Logan -260-8889 Page 42 of 295' -< \ I ~::,:> JP . .,. _I, .··· ' =j -.:.:::.. -· ,f:> ? :--> -, ,... .... -:, :.... l ~ '> t, ""'.) -I ,, ~ \ ---t> :'::-,, l"' t,'.'5 "' --0 ~~ <::., i ~) l'=> --0 .~ "" _( --J . ' .. _____ ._.,~ .-,) ·n .i:;a, 't".") (~ ~ --' , / / ___ -> -- Page 43 of 295Moab Skinny Tire Festival 2017 Safety Emergency Plan / Traffic Control Plan for Utah Department of Transportation Moab Police Department Utah Highway Patrol Grand County Sheriff Date of Event: March 11-14, 2017 Number of riders expected: 500 Contact: Ride Director: Assistant: Emergency Responders: Mark Griffith 435-260-2334 cell Beth Logan 435-260-8889 cell Mobile/enroute: Mark Griffith Base/Moab: Beth Logan HAM Net Control (person listed below) Event Base Hotel: Aarchway Inn Communications HAM Net Control: Angee Baune 303-359-8088; ac0ew1 (HAM) Based at Aarchway Inn and able to contact all tour vehicles/Aid stops. All Tour vehicles/Aid stops equipped with HAM radio and operator Saturday March 11 Route open 8AM-3PM Route: Aarchway Inn north on Hwy 191 to Moab Canyon Trail to Hwy 313 to Dead Horse Point State Park and return. Mass start at 8:00AM from Aarchway Inn Traffic control needs: Saturday Only. Close Hwy 191 temporarily (5-8 minutes) to allow riders traveling on Aarchway Inn frontage road to enter Hwy 191 northbound continuing over the vehicle bridge and connecting onto the Moab Canyon Trail directly on the north side of bridge. Page 44 of 295Sunday March 12 Route open 8:00AM-3:00PM Route: Aarchway Inn to Hwy 128 to Hittle Bottom camp area and return. Monday March 13 Route open 8:00AM-3:00PM Route: Aarchway Inn south on Hwy 191 to 100 North, east to 400 East, south to Mill Creek Drive, continue as route curves south to Spanish Valley Drive. Continue south to turnoff to Pack Creek. Turrn around and return to Archway Inn. Tuesday March 14 Route open 8:00AM-1 :OOPM Route: Aarchway Inn north on Hwy 191 to Hwy 279 (Potash) to end of pavement and return via bike path and bike/pedestrian bridge. Note: Event participants have been made aware of safety issues such as obeying all traffic laws, riding single file, single file "zero tolerance" areas1 being courteous and aware of local vehicle traffic. This information has and will be distributed to participants through event road signs, printed information, online safety videos, and an event newsletter emailed to all participants. Page 45 of 295. . N A!D'; ............... ........ .. .• . . .• .. .. ..• DEAD HORSE! POINT STATE ! PARK i . ; l. ch & DEAD!HORSE 111:!roundo-..l'..OINT Arches National Park ----Colorado River ••••••••••• , DAY 1: Dead Horse Point State Park Ride • • • • • • • • • DAY 2: Colorado River Corridor Ride ----DAY 3: Spanish Valley to La Sal Mtns "'"'"'"'""" DAY 4: River Portal Ride ----Highway Fisher Towers Page 46 of 295~ ~ MOAB MOAB CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 217 East Center Street, Suite #130 Moab, Utah 84532 (435) 259-8938 FAX(435)259-8915 To: Utah Department of Transportation From: Steve Ross Date: 01/23/2017 Moab City Police will accommodate the request to close SR 191 for approximately 10 Minutes on 03/11/2017. This should ensure the safety of the participants of the Skinny tire festival to enter the highway for a short duration before they proceed to their bike path. Regards Steve Ross Chief of Police Page 47 of 2951/18/2017 City of Moab Mail-Skinny Tire Festival -Route Map c~ail i.,Coo3lc Skinny Tire Festival -Route Map 2 messages Beth at Skinny Tire Events <beth@skinnytireevents.com> To: Jennie Ross <jennie@moabcity.org> Jennie, Thanks for getting the form from Sommer! Jennie Ross <jennie@moabcity.org> Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:55 AM 1. Route -Our route has changed in 2017 due to Arches National Park construction schedule. Attached is the updated map with a return of a route we used to use ... Spanish Valley Drive. 2. Business License. We just received the renewal application for 2017, I'll get it paid and bring or send you a copy. 3. Vendors -we do not have vendors at our event. 4. Sometimes staff asks for a letter from City of Moab Police indicating their agreement to close Hwy 191 for eight minutes while cyclists access the highway. We will gladly get that letter. Let me know what else you might want or need. And thank you! Beth Beth Logan Skinny Tire Events, LLC -Road Cycling in Moab, Utah 435.260.8889 skinnytireevents.com ~ STF Map 2017.pdf 2169K Jennie Ross <jennie@moabcity.org> Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:28 PM Draft To: Beth at Skinny Tire Events <beth@skinnytireevents.com> Beth [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ui=2&ik=b101e24fde&view=pt&search=inbox&th=159b2f1401362c18&siml=159b2f1401362c18 1/1 Page 48 of 295·11L01Lu·1 f 1.,ny or Moao Ma11 -\.!Uesuons 1Tom me ;:,ne i--1an Kev1ew 1.,ommmee Amy Weiser <aweiser@moabcity.org> Questions from the Site Plan Review Committee Beth at Skinny Tire Events <beth@skinnytireevents.com> To: Amy Weiser <aweiser@moabcity.org> Cc: Beth at Skinny Tire Events <beth@skinnytireevents.com> Amy, Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:09 PM My information must not have been clear or maybe the Route Map wasn't included in the packet. I'm more than happy to provide whatever information you need. 1. A site map isn't always requested, I apologize for giving you a very old copy of one from the past. I've attached a newer map of how we set things up on the private property at Archway Inn Hotel. The Start/Finish is at the hotel each day. Please see Route Map for location of how cyclists travel on area roads. 2. Attached is an additional sheet of paper giving Safety/Emergency Plan if you would like that. 3. All routes on this recreational tour (not a race) begin and end at Archway Inn Hotel. 4. Police assistance is needed ONLY on Saturday, March 11 for less than ten minutes. Please see Traffic Control Plan. 5. We are not having food trucks or outside food vendors selling food at the event. 6. We are not having vendors, that is why no list was provided. 7. Porta potties cyclists use on route are identified on the Map of Route. Inside the hotel participants use the hotel restrooms which are adequate. 8. We abide by the DABC and local consent rules but I'll double check to see if anything has changed. 9. We always have to get permits from Grand County as well as City of Moab, BLM, Dead Horse Point State Park, etc. We are in the process of obtaining the permit from Grand County. Thanks. Beth Beth Logan Skinny Tire Events, LLC -Road Cycling in Moab, Utah 435.260.8889 skin nytireevents.com Page 49 of 295\..lty or Moao 1v1a11-1..1uesuons rrom me ;:,ne !"Jan Kev1ew \..ommmee Questions from the Site Plan Review Committee Beth at Skinny Tire Events <beth@skinnytireevents.com> To: Amy Weiser <aweiser@moabcity.org> Cc: Beth at Skinny Tire Events <beth@skinnytireevents.com> Amy, we are not serving alcohol at the Skinny Tire Festival. Let me know if you have any other questions, and thanks! Beth Beth Logan Skinny Tire Events, LLC -Road Cycling in Moab, Utah 435.260.8889 skinnytireevents.com From: Amy Weiser [mailto:aweiser@moabcity.org] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 2:59 PM To: Beth at Skinny Tire Events Subject: Re: Questions from the Site Plan Review Committee Beth-Amy Weiser <aweiser@moabcity.org> Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:54 AM Thanks for the additional information. I will look over everything more thoroughly and get back to you tomorrow. But upon a quick review, I am still unclear as to whether or not you are serving alcohol. The City must sign the local consent form that you turn in to DABC. -Amy Amy Weiser Community Services Director Page 50 of 295201462 From: January 1, 2017 NOT TRANSFERABLE Expires: December 31, 2017 BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COUNCIL PERSONS, GRAND COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH Skinny Tire Events LLC in conformity to the Laws of the State of Utah, to conduct a Event business at Various in Grand County, State of Utah, commencing for the same on 01/01/2017 and ending on 12/31/2017. Subject to the provisions of the Laws of the State of Utah, having paid into the County Treasury the fees in accordance with the order of the Board of Grand County Council and the same is hereby duly authorized. Given under my hand and the seal of said Grand County this day January 18, 2017 . 9~~ Deputy er q,uma.~ County Clerk / I/ MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETIING February 28. 2017 Agendaltem / I/ #: 6-4 Title: Approval of a Vendor License for Christine and Kent Green, d.b.a. Moab Cowboy Country Off Road Adventures, Located at 83 South Main Street for a term of March 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018 Fiscal Impact: N/A Staff Presenter(s): Jennie Ross, Treasurer Department: Treasurer Applicant: Christine and Kent Green Background/Summary: This application is for a vendor license. The applicant was approved last year for a vending structure located at 83 South Main Street. There were no issues with the previously approved license. Staff has reviewed the proposed application and finds that it meets the requirements of our vendor ordinance. Options: The City Council may approve, deny or postpone this item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a Private Property Vendor License for Christine and Kent Green at 83 South Main Street. Recommended Motion: I move to approve a vendor license for Christine and Kent Green, d.b.a. Moab Cowboy Country Off Road Adventure. Attachment(s): Vendor Application Page 51 of 295 1 -~ Page 52 of 295DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT No.: CITVOFMOAB VENDOR {R~QUIRES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL-YEARl. Y)1 8VSINES$ l.lCEiNS~ APPUGATlQN 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB (AS DETERMINED BY RESOLUTION) LICENSE#: ---ZONE: C....3 '"""""'"' Nlo1tb l'.h.Zbo~ Guntry 0#: WM Ji/v' ,Us.essP,<>eL{§ddO O't'I(, 8USINESSMAILINGAOORESS: fo~ /3llf . CITY: Mo~ STATE: w ZIP: x(/S3;;;-e-mailaddress= Q1'Da6C~{j(0B mm l<'C02J Location(s) where business will be conducted: Attach agreement of authorization from property owner(s) /A-J-. So VV'"I.,, 1' I/\ including employee use of Restroom Facilities --~-__,_ I ____ ._I~ I_ V.U._r_ '------------Length of time and/or specific dates business wtl be conducted: ----'Y:,.....,f ... K.._.__...._( 4JU-=='-"-~__::..:&:.,,.,.,,'--------------Proposed hours of operation: ~(Y\ -\ 0 {JrY\ Type (see definitions): CJ Cart C] Vehicle Cl Display Apparatus Vendor Type (see definitions): C] Street Vendor CJ Sidewalk Vendor C] Private Property Vendor 1!l Local Vendor CJ Food Vendor Goods, wares, sesvices or merchandise to be sold or offered for sale: .... 6.........,t...,J...,,l ... d,.,,e"""'""&--==tc__._..,.,@c:..,..,r......,..~------------BUSINESS O~t-1ER's NAME: C)1{\S tlr\K l C (I vt<,r) f' kt£>1 (;/ ( e.E-c\ OWNER'S ADDRESS: 4)?f t:c: C,e/1.fU CITY: y,\ Oab OWNER'S DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY: OWNER'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: PHONE: 2'20 ~~b STATE: (A..zt_ ZIP: f?t~":J?-DATE OF BIRTH: OPERATOR'S NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROMOWNt:KJ: ------------------PHC OPERATOR'S ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER): ________ CITY:. _____ STATE: ____ ZIP: ____ _ S.AJ.ES TAX ID# (ATTACH PROOFFROM UTAH TAX COMMISSION): _ NAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FORT AX 10: _ ___._C'J,,k\..__r;.......;.., .... S'"":\1c...;..;..M__,;;._..;;;e::.,_6:;..:..:(:_e;::;._ed1..:;__:, ____________ _ PLEASE REVIEW AND COMPLETE THE ATTACHED VENDOR CHECKLIST AND BUSINESS LICENSE CHECKLIST ONCE YOUR COMPLETE APPL/CATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. IT WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE VENDOR COMMITTEE. YOU WILL BE CONTACTED IF MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO PROCESS YOUR APPL/CATION. YOUR FEE WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER COMMITTEE REVIEW. ONCE YOUR FEE IS PAID, YOUR APPLICATION WILL THEN BE FORWARDED TO THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. PROCESSING AND APPROVAL MAY TAKE 4-6 WEEKS. Sl;E BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS! Page 53 of 295THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A BUSINESS LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED ONLY WHEN ALL INSPECTIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED, ALL FEES HAVE BEEN PAID, ALL SUBMIITALS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ANO THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN COMMITTEE REVIEWED, STAFF APPROVED AND APPROVED BY THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL (IF APPLICABLE). ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. IT IS A CLASS 'C' MIS~~NOR TO OWN OR OPERATE A BUSINESS IN THE CITY OF MOAB WITHOUT A CURRENT BUSINESS LICENSE. INI/E Ul \ '(\ St't'.'.1,e; fz ~("t, t-0 HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY Pl.EASE PR1"1' NAME(SI BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES ANO RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. I/WE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON•TRANSFERABLE ANO VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION ~,ow .... 1/W '"'o""''"'"'°"""'°,0'"""'"sm,o,UT1/ I~{. a:!)(f t Ole ;1.D/] DEFINITIONS: }-Cart: A small mobile cart or wagon that occupies a temporary location on a sidewalk or private property and is a humanly propelled wheeled vehicle that may contain food or other items for sale. o Stationary mobile cart. A cart having functional wheels and an axle that occupies one temporary location for a specified period of time. )> Display apparatus: A nonpermanent structure such as a table, stand, wagon, tray, cart, tents with three sides open or other displays for the sale of goods, merchandise, food, wares or services on private property. Teepees shall not be considered a display apparatus and shall not be used for vending purposes. )> Vehicle: A motorized vehicle used for displaying, storing or transporting of articles offered for sale by a Vendor and is currently licensed and registered by the Department of Motor Vehicles. )> Vendor: Any person(s) engaged in the selling or offering for sale of food, beverages or merchandise on private property, public streets or sidewalks. The tern, "Vendor" includes (but does not include solicitor or soliciting activities as defined in Code Chapter 5.14.): o Street Vendors, o Sidewalk Vendors, o Private property Vendors, and o Food Vendors, }> Local Vendor: Any person or any agent, or employee of any person who shall offer for sale to the public any goods, wares, services, merchandise or foodstuffs in or from any temporary structure, stand, or other approved place in the city and who has a permanent place of business within Moab City or Grand County. > Private Property Vendor: Any business that exhibits, displays, offers for sale or sells any food, beverages, goods, wares or merchandise from a cart, fixed cart, stationary mobile cart, display apparatus, or vehicle located in a described location on private property. Merchandise may be displayed on display apparatus as defined below. )> Sidewalk Vendor: Any person who sells or offers for sale from temporary locations for limited durations on any public sidewalk (excluding city parks and Mill Creek Parkway) any goods, wares, merchandise, services, food or beverages from a cart or by foot from a pack, basket or similar container, or hand held display. }> Street Vendor: Any person travelling by vehicle, bicycle or other street-legal conveyance on public or private streets and who carries, conveys, or transports goods, wares or merchandise and offers them for sale. 11127/20(3 T:\BUS1N£SS l/CENSES\BUS UC FORMS\B11s Lie· Vendor r·evison.docx Page 54 of 295VENDOR APPLICATION CHECKLIST LI DESCRIPTION OF THE DISPLAY, APPARATUS OR CART {IF APPLICABLE) INCLUDING: r:J1JJMENS/ONS OF THE STRUCTURE MHOTOGRAPHS OF STRUCTURE CJ,SiTE PLAN TO A SCALE OF NOT LESS THAN 1/B"EQUALS ONE FOOT SHOWNG: 0 THE COMPLETE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY WITH DIMENSIONS 0 ALL STRUCTURES AND DIMENSIONS 0 ALL DISTANCES FROM BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY LINES 0 LOCATIONS OF ALL DRIVES, PARKING AREAS, LOADING AREAS AND SIGN LOCATIONS ON THE PROPERTY D LANDSCAPED AREAS wrrH DIMENSIONS 0 ALL EASEMENTS IMPACTING THE PROPERTY 0 SIGN PLAN LI CERTIFICATION OF INSURANCE (IF OPERATING ON CITY PROPERTY OR RIGHT·OF•WA Y) LI BACKGROUND CHECK {IF PROPOSING OPERATION IN A RESIDENTIAL ZONE) 0 FILL OUT ATTACHED INFORMED CONSENT AND RELEASE OF LIABILITY FORM LI HEAL TH INSPECTION REPORT {IF APPLICABLE) 0 IF APPLICANT PROPOSES TO HANDLE OR OFFER FOODSTUFFS FOR SALE, ATTACH AN INSPECTION REPORT FROM THE SOUTHEASTERN UTAH HEALTH DISTRICT SANITARIAN, DATED NOT MORE THAN TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE DA TE OF APPLICATION. ALL APPLICANTS AND STRUCTURES MUST COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE OF UTAH HEALTH REGULA TlONS. r,;r{oNING COMPLIANCE EVIDENCE EJ COMPLETE ATTACHED COMPLIANCE FORM fl ATTACHED PROPERTY OWNERS AUTHORIZATION LETTER ff ATTACHED WRITTEN RESTROOM AGREEMENT LI REFUSE/RECYCLING PLAN (IF APPLICABLE) ~E OR BUILDING INSPECTION (IF APPLICABLE) 0 COMPLETE ATTACHED INSPECTION SHEET LI SPECIAL EVENT AUTHORIZATION {IF APPLICABLE) 0 ATTACH A STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION FROM THE SPECIAL EVENT SPONSOR IF APPLICANT INTENDS TO CONDUCT BUSINESS ON THE PREMISES OF A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT. ATTACH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDICATED BELOW: 11127/2013 T:\BUS/NESS l/CENSES\OUS UC FORMSlB11s Lie-Vell(/01• revisou.docx Page 55 of 295LICENSE APPROVALS MOAB CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: ______ _ D APPROVED CJ DISAPPROVED REASON(S): _________________________________ _ SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ______________________________ _ CITY PLANNING D APPROVED D DISAPPROVED REASON(S): _________________________________ _ CITY RECORDER DAPPROVED D DISAPPROVED REASON(S): _________________________________ _ LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: _______ _ SIGNATURE OF CITY RECORDER COMMITTEE REVIEW DATE: D APPROVED D DISAPPROVED REASON(S): _________________________________ _ Fee Calculation: Mobife Vendor Fee Structure . ···Lifn1t.id fe'frn (1Jsfi:ha1130'daifsl·· 1.ongT errn (l'rrion1:11-12irririnths) •waived for local vendors with permanent business address in Grand County //:17120/J T:\RUS!NESS UCE.\'SES\JJUS UC FOR,\1S:ll11s lie~ rem/or revison.docx Page 56 of 295FOR OFFICE Use ONLY REASON POR INSPECTIONS: CITY OF MOAB BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTIONS 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 0 INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING BUSINESS ADDING ANEW-SERVICE(S). INDICATE SERVICE(S): ------------'· . iJ OTHER, PLEASE EXPLAIN: _ __.Rc...,....;;Ul:c:...,..;:l-:.,.L..._,_l __ l,.._,1-1 _,,(...,._1',,._h .......... ..::::>::C..___L=-:_c.,.._:..".'::H,.,=_.,,,_-__________ _ BUSINESS NAME: 81./SlNESS ADDRESS: OWNER'S NAME: q7 '5o 2(14),n TYPE OF BUSINESS (EXPLAIN IN DETAIL): BUSINESS PHONE: ER--· --THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CALL AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR INSPECTIONS. BUILDING INSPECTOR (435} 259-1344/1345 125 EAST CENTER INSPECTION REQUIRED: r:J YES i:J No (SIGNA FIRE INSPECTOR (435) 259-5557 45 SOUTH 100 EAST INSPECTION R~~ED: a YES ~O (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION. ____ _ APPROVE~ISAPPROVED i:J REASON: HEAL TH INSPECTOR ( 435)259-5602 575 KANE CREEK BLVD INSPECTION REQUIRED: r:J Yes ;si,No (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION. ____ _ APPRO:JVE DISAPPROVED CJ REASON: 7'--...f---/7 // / SIGNATURE V -----·--••H-·--·· ----·-·----------~-·-·--•--•-"-~---._.__.--~-~----·----------·--------------·---····-·---... -· ....... ,---. 0710//05 Page 57 of 295FOR OFFICE Use ONLY REASON FOR INSPECTIONS: CtTYOFMOAB BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTIONS 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 ( 435) 259-5121 / FAX ( 435) 259-4135 [J INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING BUSINESS ADDING A NEW SERVICE(S). INDICATE SERVICE(S): ------------0 OTHER, PLEASEEXPLAJN:_~R~.e...._!'.16:::\~=,.J~-\-)_~-~~~L~,--~~~~------------BUSINESS NAME: BUSINESS ADDRESS: q1 $-0 , ChM n OWNER'SNAME: ~ ~ Chin~£lct.lcJ {xce.11 BUSINESS PHONE: l(J 5 d' .)-(] () 1'f(o OWNER'S PHONE if 3 J d' ;}-(J (J -=rn TYPE OF BUSINESS (EXPLAIN IN DETAIL): fW-e_. G..v l DE:, ---~--~--------------------------THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CALL AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR INSPECTIONS. BUILDING INSPECTOR (435) 259-1344/1345 125 EAST CENTER INSPECTION REQUIRED: • YES C] NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION. ____ _ APPROVED li!I DISAPPROVED C] REASON: ~L ~..w, IGNA TURE -=:: FIRE INSPECTOR (435) 259-5557 45 SOUTH 100 EAST INSPECTION REQUIRED: C] YES C] No (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION. ____ _ APPROVED C] DISAPPROVED C] REASON: SIGNATURE HEAL TH INSPECTOR (435)259-5602 575 KANE CREEK BLVD INSPECTION REQUIRED: C] YES C] NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION. ____ _ APPROVED C] DISAPPROVED C] REASON: SIGNATURE 07/01105 Page 58 of 295a MOAB Lny or iv1oao 21 7 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Business License Zoning Compliance Application To be filled out by the applicant: Name of Applicant Oin"o\J/'l{, {{l_;rtdUJt l f/ ~+ &--e.cn Business NamvYn~CbuhOj Ci,wi~ji ff<1.J)f&flurC4 Address: '3Yj _U/)kr (fQ___J~) /hqb ,K-e_r,r 'L ~l'ld-, Phone: 1of 3--60 (Y;y' Email: moa/;:JWW~tj8jf'l1@1.,~ PropertyOwner: ~ J ~(}fh(a,, ~ Vendor Type (see Moab Municipal Code Chapter 5.64.010 for definitions): OStreet Vendor 0Sidewalk Vendor D Private Property Vendor )ef Local Vendor D Food Vendor Type (see Moab Municipal Code Chapter 5.64.010 for definitions): . D Cart O Vehicle ~isplay Apparatus ~0j Detailed description of business activities: ---={i:::....!....>0'-''l=&J__..::....~-~-_;__ ______ ..J__ __ -t~\,(S ~vL ~ O\,t/' (J Af 6 r4 l \Je. ttk: ilif 6,U,VJ-t' fN-lfYlf'&An~ of w,-K, twpuvc OJ\.cL --ff\ ,6{1L, 1Jr:Mfn WN~ 1n tooa. ~ Dn 'lr~ ,-~ot Total number of off-street parking spaces: } C l,v(, O)(neh~ dYJ efA-fet!pft er t'tt// ~ Hours of operation: ~b'.J -(0 fm To be filled out by cit;y: Zoning: _C_·~----------All owed use per Moab Municipal Code section: -'-n-'-'. 2~1-~-C_,~"-'c'---'=-(_l ;....:..__ ________ _ Number of parking spaces required for permanent business: MN'iO"-\V\~ -;'(2J.\Pl IJg i::DbT -<; Number of parking spaces required for other businesses: ·,(V MM'{TOV\l N ·· '6 :J. )t;-\1 Zoning Administrator Date Page 59 of 295CITY OF MOAB 2 1 7 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532-2534 (435) 259-51 2 1 FAX (435) 259-4 1 35 Property Owner Authorization Letter City of Moab Treasurer's Office 217 E. Center St. Date: Moab, UT 84532 '2-0 This letter is to certify that I, ___ -_VJmA-__ (p-rop-ert-y-ow.....:.f:.....er-!:-m-,1--~~+--~--' ol_.....:.~--~..4--am the owner of the property located at g~ ~O, mac: n JV10~ o,~ 6 )lf_-Ooo<f I understand that G_by\ &'tJ Y\Q ( e,;:;;=·'"~~/;;r (Yr_V'I (,,m, of bos;o~s Hcej appka<><) has applied for a business license for Ji/l(!JoJJ ~ d}~ ~r\J /+J (/ · (applicant business name) from the City of Moab and that their business will be located from the above described address. I hereby give my permission to allow this activity from my property and authorize use of my restroom facilities for employees of the above listed business. 6221> ~ f2 0f;C,RT Signature Pnnted Name Telephone# Please list additional businesses authorized to use the above property and restroom facilities: Page 60 of 295I t I I I t I i i ! i I I I . I I I I I I . I I I 3; ::!. c ; v\ ~i I I I '-» ~ I I I t j j ~ rt: w. I / I I I I I : i : ; : I : u ·c.o.A e__ ', I 1' : I t I I . 1 I I ll -==-5fect 1 ' I I I . I [ t , .•. ; I t . : I I • "; ID kdr : ' ' .',t-.• . . ' • I I . I I : I . ' I I +--2/)3) ~ I ~ l I t ;· , j 1 1 ; 1 , ~ ; f'{ , ' f ~ t-• t l I 1 1" • t t· I . I t I I I I I ' I j I _;.. I I 11 :I. I 1 li'f 1iJ1 I, I'''' I ?f . ' . 1' ! i I i I I I : : ' l 1· l I . f 1 , • , • • I I I I-I ; t I· I I i i I I ( ~ I I t ~ t ! i I t : I J ' j I I •· I I t I I I I ~ ' I I l 'f-~ I t I· ' I I ~ I I ' I I I I I I I ; I . I t I I i t f I + .. t f 1 I I I I + : ~ l i ! • t· • t t I f j I t I I I I l 1 t t . . I I I + • I I f t t· ' + I I I I I ~ I I t t r f t t I I l .. ~ t;.,f ,IP ! I I 1 I ~IP'.!i[f " • • I + ~J : .,, . /j-I I· <- I ... •· t ... t t .. ·. ; I t 1-~ ~% I l j j .. ( t t ~ I t I I I j I •· t t I > I • I I I ' I:~ J , 3o ' , ,_: , .. 4£ D : I· it f • + 1 t < 5b; -+ • .. ... I t I ~ _ _, _ __,, ~ t-+ I· ·~ j I I I j L +. 6.o 1 r , , 'n. I J Slf' ~ ! t -f • t 1 t I + ~ i + ' J-t l j ! • t i t I ~--t j j j ! t • I t • 1 l . I t I I I 1 t t i + 1 I j t I ! I I I I t I l l i \) l' ! t f + t -C :. I ! ; j ! : : t 1 ·f ~ i H ~ T : ; ' .. ,,-~T.-3~ L r(;, I•··. 1~1 I ~ t i I l I i I t ' ' I· t· I I I t ' t t ' t ' ~ I I ~ _. I • -,. -i + .. ~ .-I ; ~ &3) --=j::, f · , . t t l 1 '. j i · -· · · · · · · 1 1 , , . . I r t I ,.., . l f I . -,_ . l.!.=lio•l --1--I· t ~ t • ~ I t t ~ ~ ~r ~ i. i l t V &l ; ; , ; ·: ·. . , : : : ·. . .1 : ; . 1 51 . . . ? 3 . · ..J • , C .1,;--1 ~ ~. Jt.l' I I I ~ . . t .. + r ·t + + + ·r • i Q) ~· [ I f • Mo.i._bClmh~.l :203 :. / ' , I ' ' . • • , • . • l I .:v, } r I : : : :· : ' ~-~()(Qed ~f\~e. l I i r ,. i r. I ~ I DO C i\(}.}t11\_ ~ ~ ' f . , . , . • • .,XJJQ.Oj.:\01'\ \v ~;).O . · I J r I l ~ ~ • Page 61 of 295 MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEET NG Agendaltem #: 6-5 Title: Approval of a Vendor License for Joelle Riddle and Max Schon, d.b.a. Yummytown LLC, Located at 83 South Main Street for a term of April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 and February 1, 2018 to March 31, 2018 Fiscal Impact: N/A Staff Presenter(s): Jennie Ross, Treasurer Department: Treasurer Applicant: Joelle Riddle and Max Schon Background/Summary: This applicant is seeking approval for a new Mediterranean food truck located on the Canyonlands Trading Post property at 83 South Main Street. The application is in compliance with code sections 5.64.050 General Operating Standards and 5.64.060 Specific Operating Standards with the following exception. The applicant is requesting an increase in the number of tables and seating. Code section 5.64.060(g) states, "Seating may be provided as approved by City Council to include a table and up to six seats. Seating areas shall be located adjacent to the display and in no case exceed forty square feet in area." The applicant is requesting an exception to allow a total of four (4) tables and sixteen (16) chairs. Options: The City Council may approve, deny or postpone this item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a Private Property Vendor License, subject to the following condition: 1.All required inspections as listed in the Vendor Application 2.Hours of operation shall be limited to 11:00 am to 10 pm 3.Specific Busin ess Dates to be 4/1/17-12/31/17, and 2/1/18 - 3/31/18 4.Approve the requested exception for a total of four tables and sixteen chairs as shown on the site plan . Page 62 of 295 Page 63 of 295Recommended Motion: "I move to approve a food vendor license for Joelle Riddle and Max Schon d.b.a. Yummytown LLC to be located at 83 S. Main Street." Attachment(s): Vendor Application Page 64 of 295' CITY OF MOAB DATE PAID: VENDOR AMOUNT PAID: mEQUIRES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL-YEARLY), a,USINl;SS l.lC~NSI;. APPl,lC.ATlON FEE: $ ~ 3 0, "° {AS DETERMINED BY RESOLUTION) RECEIPT No.: 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 /FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB BUSINESS NAME: "u M /Ii.'{ loUJN UC BUSINESS MAILING ADDRESS: ~ B0"1: r=t49 CITY: M oA6 e-mailaddress: 'JonM'IIOWNPOODTl'lUUL{g 6-r1AIL, c.OM Location(s) where business will be conducted: Attach agreement of aulhorizalion from property owner(s) including employee use of Restroom F acililies Length of time and/or specific dates business will be conducted: .• ~'-+'4~~-LICENSE#: __ _ ZONE: C.3 BUSINESS PHONE: q 1o ,~°L, '5't15 STATE: JlL ZIP: 8YS 3 2 Proposed hours of operation: _____J\L!l..n.1u._·--~2• _JP'--'--M_._--1-..µ,:.+-~~=:=-.!.:~+-!....::~l"--'.___.:.ll.di!5'.)1.~~-------Type (see definitions): Cl Cart 'tii Vehicle D Display Apparatus Vendor Type (see definitions): Cl Street Vendor Cl Sidewalk Vendor ~ private Property Vendor Cl Local Vendor t°(Food Vendor Goods, wares, seivices or merchandise to be sold or offered for sale: M £.P1If£t2,VJ~ N FQo D . BUSINESS0WNER'SNMIE: .3DillL (lU)OLf, MD HA],. ~1') PHo~10,14,q.3r20 OWNER'S ADDRESS: 140 £ <'. I 00 S CITY: HDA(1, STATE: UT ZIP: g4537_ OWNER'S DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF tOENTIT' OWNER'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: DAlE OF BIRTH: OPERATOR'S NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER): _________________ _ PHUNt: ______ _ OPERATOR'S ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER):. ________ CnY:. _____ STATE: ____ ZIP:-----SAlEs TAX ID# (ATTACH PROOF FROM UTAH TAXC0MM1ss10NJ: 14 "JSC, Z'10 -Or'J L/ -ST c NAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX 10: _'_,/._.u""-'-M'""n_,_1 ........ r__,o .... w ...... ,v _ _.LL-==-L.._ ________________ _ PLEASE REVIEW AND COMPLETE THE ATTACHED VENDOR CHECKLIST AND BUSINESS LICENSE CHECKLIST ONCE YOUR COMPLETE APPL/CATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, IT WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE VENDOR COMMITTEE. YOU WILL BE CONTACTED IF MORE INFORMATION JS REQUIRED TO PROCESS YOUR APPL/CAT/ON. YOUR FEE WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER COMMITTEE REVIEW. ONCE YOUR FEE IS PAID, YOUR APPL/CATION WILL THEN BE FORWARDED TO THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. PROCESSING AND APPROVAL MAY TAKE 4-6 WEEKS. SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS! Page 65 of 295THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A BUSINESS LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED ONLY WHEN ALL INSPECTIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED, ALL FEES HAVE BEEN PAID, ALL SUBMITTAL$ HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ANO THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN COMMITTEE REVIEWED, STAFF APPROVED ANO APPROVED BY THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL (IF APPLICABLE). ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. IT IS A CLASS 'C' MISDEMEANOR TO OWN OR OPERATE A BUSINESS IN THE CITY OF MOAB WITHOUT A CURRENT BUSINESS LICENSE. INl/E j Olli t_ \'21.0 OU.. 1 ('1 A..)( ~ <../~Q~ HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY Pl.EASE PRINT NAME(S) BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, ANO SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFOR TION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. I/WE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON-TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION AND rnER. INl/E A EE T FILE T OP~fi REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH, 1,2-6· 11 Dato Stat of Utah § County of Grand DEFINITIONS: JAMIE HULCE Notary Public State of Utah Comm. No. 662071 My Comm. Explrt1 FIii 2, 2017 ;., Cart: A small mobile cart or wagon that occupies a temporary location on a sidewalk or private property and is a humanly propelled wheeled vehicle that may contain food or other items for sale. o Stationary mobile cart. A cart having functional wheels and an axle that occupies one temporary location for a specified period of time. }> Display apparatus: A nonpermanent structure such as a table, stand, wagon, tray, cart, tents with three sides open or other displays for the sale of goods, merchandise, food, wares or services on private property. Teepees shall not be considered a display apparatus and shall not be used for vending purposes. }> Vehicle: A motorized vehicle used for displaying, storing or transporting of articles offered for sale by a Vendor and is currently licensed and registered by the Department of Motor Vehicles. }> Vendor: Any person(s) engaged in the selling or offering for sale of food, beverages or merchandise on private property, public streets or sidewalks. The term "Vendor" includes (but does not include solicitor or soliciting activities as defined in Code Chapter 5.14.): o Street Vendors, o Sidewalk Vendors, o Private property Vendors, and o Food Vendors, >" Local Vendor: Any person or any agent, or employee of any person who shall offer for sale to the public any goods, wares, services, merchandise or foodstuffs in or from any temporary structure, stand, or other approved place in the city and who has a permanent place of business within Moab City or Grand County. » Private Property Vendor: Any business that exhibits, displays, offers for sale or sells any food, beverages, goods, wares or merchandise from a cart, fixed cart, stationary mobile cart, display apparatus, or vehicle located in a described location on private property. Merchandise may be displayed on display apparatus as defined below. >" Sidewalk Vendor: Any person who sells or offers for sale from temporary locations for limited durations on any public sidewalk ( excluding city parks and Mill Creek Parkway) any goods, wares, merchandise, services, food or beverages from a cart or by foot from a pack, basket or similar container, or hand held display. > Street Vendor: Any person travelling by vehicle, bicycle or other street-legal conveyance on public or private streets and who carries, conveys, or transports goods, wares or merchandise and offers them for sale. I 1127/2013 T:\BUSINESS UCENSES\/JUS LIC PO/?MS\Bus Uc· Ve11clor reviso11.doc.r Page 66 of 295VENDOR APPL/CATION CHECKLIST i DESCRIPTION OF THE DISPLAY, APPARATUS OR CART (IF APPLICABLE) INCLUDING: ~ »iMENSIONS OF THE STRUCTURE cr;(tf'HOTOGRAPHSOFSTRUCTURE fi2I SITE PLAN 70 A SCALE OF NOT LESS THAN 1/B"EQUALS ONE FOOT SHOWl'IG: ~ THE COMPLETE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY WITH DIMENSIONS 2J / ALL STRUCTURES AND DJMENSfONS ef" ALL DISTANCES FROM BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY LINES ill' LOCATIONS OF ALL DRIVES, PARKING AREAS, LOADING AREAS AND SIGN LOCATIONS ON THE /PROPERTY i'1, LANDSCAPED AREAS WITH DIMENSIONS / ;?' ALL EASEMENTS IMPA'?_TING THE,PR',Jf;._ERTY 0 SIGN PLAN iJ ) I\ l W\i,{1\,1,\ \ vdW\Ul} 0 CERT/FICA TION OF INSURANCE (IF OPERA TING ON CITY PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY} D BACKGROUND CHECK (IF PROPOSING OPERATION IN A RESIDENTIAL ZONE) NI(\ / 0 FILL OUT A TT ACHED INFORMED CONSENT AND RELEASE OF LIABILJTY FORM 'fi;YHEAL TH INSPECTION REPORT (IF APPLICABLE} 0 /F APPLICANT PROPOSES TO HANDLE OR OFFER FOODSTUFFS FOR SALE, ATTACH AN INSPECTION REPORT FROM THE SOUTHEASTERN UTAH HEALTH DISTRICT SANITARIAN, DATED NOT MORE THAN TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF APPL/CATTON. ALL APPLICANTS AND STRUCTURES MUST COMPLY / WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE OF UTAH HEALTH REGULATIONS. 1:izoN/NG COMPLIANCE EVIDENCE 0 COMPLETE ATTACHED COMPLIANCE FORM 0 A TT ACHED PROPERTY OWNERS A UTHORIZA TJON LETTER / 0 ATTACHED WRITTEN RESTROOM AGREEMENT i REFUSE/RECYCLING PLAN (IF APPLICABLE) 0 FIRE OR BUILDING INSPECTION (IF APPLICABLE) 0 COMPLETE A TT ACHED INSPECTION SHEET 0 SPECIAL EVENT AUTHORIZATION {IF APPLICABLE) 0 ATTACH A STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZA T/ON FROM THE SPECIAL EVENT SPONSOR IF APPLICANT INTENDS TO CONDUCT BUSINESS ON THE PREMISES OF A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT. ATTACH ADDITIONAL INFOR~ATION INDICATED BELOW: , • ~ . • ,~ 0 ·-ff<.~"r'~l~; ~ l(.e~J\f( 1lAA oJti:0 I c{,c; i/1,(X,t C('.3, I /127/2013 T:\BUSINESS l!CENSES\IJUS UC H)!MlS\IJ11s lie· Vendor revison.docx Page 67 of 295LICENSE APPROVALS MOAB CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: _______ _ D APPROVED 0 DISAPPROVED REASON(s):. __________________________________ _ SPECIAL CONDITIONS:. _______________________________ _ CITY PLANNING D APPROVED D DISAPPROVED REASON(S):. __________________________________ _ CITY RECORDER 0 APPROVED (] DISAPPROVED REASON(S): __________________________________ _ LICENSE ExPIRATlON DATE: _______ _ SIGNATURE OF C1T'f RECORDER COMMITTEE REVIEW DATE: D APPROVED 0 DISAPPROVED REASON(S):. __________________________________ _ Fee Calculation: I l/1712013 T:\IJU5'.JNESS UCENSESiBUS UC l·'ORMS\1311.1· Lie· VP1ulor rerison.doc.r Page 68 of 295Fa;; OFFIC.E Use ONLY ,-REASON FOR INSPECTIONS: CITY OF MOAB BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTIONS 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 ': '', ' ' ' ' '., " . ' . : : lJ INSPECTION~ REOUIREDFORAN EXJSTl~G BUSINESS ADDING A NEW S;R\OCE(S) •. INDICATE SERVICE(S): ----'---------,--·-\:Cl . .'OTHER;,P,LEASEEXPLA!N: __ -,---------,-------'---'---'-----~------~-BUSINESS NAME: ~ ~,rY\i'Y\':f ~ t L,L,l.-, . Bus1N,ssAoo•,ss: t',O, eio)( ll-<t°\ Mo~ l,l,T CZ>45:".>'l.. Bus1NessPeo,E: q91J. -=t4q, ::,=f:W OWNER'S NAME W\f...Y, ~h.Of'I ~ 3blllZ R,;i le, OWNERS PHONE q-::io .11,q' '5l-i0 TYPE OF Bus1NEss (EXPLAIN IN om1,), fow\ 1 V1AlU--W\ o\oi 1l, Mecl1 +-e-vvCLW tLY\ --C',tl;\t'..Vt ~ THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CALL AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR INSPECTIONS. BUILDING INSPECTOR (435) 259-1344/1345 125 EAST CENTER INSPECTION REQUIRED: 0 YES O NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION. _____ _ APPROVED D DISAPPROVED D REASON: SIGNATURE FIRE INSPECTOR (435) 259-5557 45 SOUTH 100 EAST INSPECTION REQUIRED: D YEs D No (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IFYES, DATE OF INSPECTION ____ _ APPROVED D DISAPPROVED D REASON: SIGNATURE HEAL TH INSPECTOR (435)259-5602 575 KANE CREEK BLVD INSPECTION REQUIRED: riif YEs D No (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION To 1:,,.,sr::to ... c.?t...(,i-c J APPROVED~ DISAPPROVED 0 REASON: 0710//(}5 Page 69 of 295Lity or iv1oao 21 7 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Business License Zoning Compliance Application To be filled out by the applicant: Name of Applicant: 3"0~L.LL {lU)Ol:L 4 t1 A.'/.. SCHQ,J Business Name: 'f llt1M"tr0u.JN LLC.. Address: 8~ S. MAW ST HOA6 Phone: Y3 S 6 259 , rOb l Property Owner: (<Obhl\ QA'IE,.. Vendor Type (see Moab Municipal Code Chapter 5.64.010 for definitions): D Street Vendor D Sidewalk Vendor lKJ..private Property Vendor D Local Vendor [ilFood Vendor Type (see Moab Municipal Code Chapter 5.64.010 for definitions): D Cart 00 Vehicle 0Display Apparatus Detailed description of business activities: -------------------Total number of off-street parking spaces:--'=-------------------Hours of operation: \\ AM -SPM CsonMae:) ll AM ·-5 PM (01/j[Jt. t101vrtJ5J To be filled out by city: Zoning: _~_?J _________ _ Allowed use per Moab Municipal Code section:_\_1-'--. M--2-'-'~c..:..· -"-O.IL2_,_,,0<--:...l-'-I )L_ _________ _ Number of parking spaces required for permanent business: _5 ___ --,--~~-----MOAB CO''Nf,O'( COU!JT(l'{-·'3 Number of parking spaces required for other businesses: ,::,.&t-.\'-=--'ON'-ll.JJ.CO!..!N~Bk'.'..-· ~\ ________ _ Zoning Administrator Date Page 70 of 295CITY OF MOAB 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532-2534 (435) 259-5121 FAX (435) 259-41 35 Property Owner Authorization Letter Date: -~>.,..}_..,_-=--.,,_,.)~,~1--t 7 City of Moab Treasurer's Office 217 E. Center St. Moab, UT 84532 This letter is to certify that I, e 171 ,r £ 0 A;"::/-.,._ (property owner name am the owner of the prope1iy located at ?3 ;;. Y'.Yle,~ (property address and parcel tax ID#) /=e.-"'1._ 'C '::,-...,_, 3 1 /3"'-', <r? -0 3, t;J?) ...... f, I understand that ------"3'--'0UJ,£""""'"'°"~(2.=::W~O::.::i..c..t-'--1¥'0=-"'0'--H'--'-'--A:.LJ'-'---'=S"-'· C..e2.HO.!l..."--'°,-;=---' ______ _ (name of business license applicnnt) has applied for a business license for _'/LU"-'M'-"-/1'--'"'/_,/_,0""UJ=..:tJ-=--------------(applicant business name) from the City of Moab and that their business will be located from the above described address. I hereby give my permission to allow this activity from my prope1ty and authorize use ofmy restroom facilities for employees of the above listed business. Signature ;-),,,...._ :2. s ') ?o t, I f? 5 -z._ ,;-J ~~ '} I Telephone# Printed Name Cwioy, Email/ Please list additional businesses authorized to use the above property and restroom facilities: Page 71 of 2951/2512017 Oh My Dog! -Google Maps "loMM'/TOWrv SI.l[ PLAN .I-T ,~ I' M 1 f>Ait\c!)Je,. -----I>\ -'=''""""""-·""'"'--·"" __ ,,~~-""""'·-·~--·-~ ta • 'q . lit' .. • {'Jm1'1>11,ctoo@fu ll'1 Jr ,, ..... \ f>Afl. \t.'tJJ G------> ~--roo~·1..rfr-7-'II .q-'S3 S. MA-IN s, C-!-',N'/010 UND5 T/!AOWG-PoST PA't-JcvJ(r WT) .._ t:)'iikllilim;J lliilf@a If' I" ........ ..._ C: Map data©2017 Google 20 ft -~··. ~ --~ ' -I -I > https:llwww.google.com'mapslplace/Oh+My+Dog ! /@38.5722462,-109.5502994,47m'data=! 3m1 ! 1e3! 4m5! 3m4! 1sO><l:Om4877c4723bc2e6e! 8m2! 3d38.5721236! 4d-109.5504358 112 Page 72 of 2951/2512017 79 S Main St Moab, Utah Street View -Aug 2013 79 S Main St-Google Maps 79 S Main St ~ :> 5 t1A-vJ ST ~ ' S11Zz£"T \f1.~\.JJ oP. Pfl.oPost;D A(<..fA. '/uMM'-ITOWN wt-LLB£.-\>l148'2-E.. ll-+£. TIZVGIL :i:s :i:,..J Ti-1£. f'.)/-10'1"0. If-! 6\+ N'I 00& 0085 NOT 1<£-Tu!ZN J:.N 2.017-, 'fvMMy ·,owrJ u.n:1..1.. 6£.. LN TH'£.. WC.ATT.DN l,£Loc..i. Tl+t.. 9A<:,-AN ST..6-/V w T)-\-[. PJ~oTO. Image capture: Aug 2013 © 2017 Google https://www.google.com/maps/~ace/Oh+MytDog !/@38.5721424,-109.5507299,3a,75y,93h,90Udata~! 3m7! 1e1 ! 3m5! 1 sROP><61X7q rzN9QK1 LQeb3g ! 2e0! 6s%2F%2Fgeo3.g g phtcom%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DROP><6I... 1/2 Page 73 of 295Supplemental Information Truck YummyTown has begun the process of having a custom food truck manufactured. The anticipated finish date is around the beginning of March. Attached in this application is a photo of the truck being fabricated, as well as an image of our logo which will be on the truck, to provide the committee with an idea of what the finished truck will look like. The dimensions of the truck are 10'x8'x25'. Signage Yummy Town understands that all signage must be attached to the truck. Our menu will be on a 3'x4' board attached to the right side of the service window. It will be removable for transport. Below is a copy of our menu: Greek Gyros: charred pork shoulder, tzatziki, crispy romaine, warm pita $9.95 Falafel: deep fried garbanzo fritters, tahini sauce, crispy romaine, warm pita $9.95 Merguez Lamb Kebab: grilled North African spiced ground lamb with harissa, tzatziki, warm pita $10.95 Chicken Shish Kebab: grilled Persian marinated chicken thigh with mint yogurt sauce, warm pita $9.95 Tortilla Espanola: egg and potato omelet, mixed greens, garlic aioli $7.95, add Serrano ham $9.95 Simple Green Salad: local mixed greens, seasonal vegetables, daily vinaigrette $3.95 Mediterranean Sampler: hummus, Tobu/eh, olives, feta, peperoncini, warm pita $7.95 Recycling Tahdig: saffron Rice with almonds and raisins $3.95 Tabuleh $3.95 Hummus $3.95 Daily Shrub: refreshingly tart and sweet drink with soda water $3.50 Blue Sky sodas, San Pellegrino, water $1.50 Feta .50 Pita: $1.50 Serrano Ham: $3.95 Mint Yogurt Sauce .50 Tzatziki .50 Olives $1.50 Garlic Aioli .50 YummyTown is committed to being environmentally friendly and will use biodegradable and recycled paper and plastic products whenever possible. Additionally, YummyTown will provide a recycling bin for customers, which we will bring as needed to the Moab Recycling Center. Page 74 of 295 Page 75 of 295'.> Resolution #14‐2017  Page 1 of 1  Resolution #14‐2017    A RESOLUTION APPROVING A ZONING STATUS AGREEMENT FOR THE LIONSBACK RESORT    WHEREAS, State and School Institutional Trust Lands Administration has exercised its right of exemption from Moab Land Use Review Processes for the Lionsback Resort; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Status Agreement has been presented to this meeting of the City Council; Now therefore, we, the governing body of the City of Moab do hereby authorize the Mayor to execute the Zoning Status Agreement as presented. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of Moab City in open session this 14TH day of February, 2017. CITY OF MOAB By: David L. Sakrison Mayor Attest: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder Page 76 of 295 1 ZONING STATUS AGREEMENT (Lionsback Resort) THIS ZONING STATUS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into and made effective as of December 13, 2016 (“Effective Date”) by and between the City of Moab, a Utah municipal corporation, acting through its City Council (“City”); LB Moab Land Company, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Developer”); and the State of Utah, acting by and through the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (“SITLA”). The City, the Developer and SITLA are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”. RECITALS A. The State of Utah, through SITLA, is the owner of a certain parcel of real property situated in Grand County, Utah consisting of 139.95 acres, more or less, more particularly described in the Development Agreement (defined below) (“Property”). B. The State of Utah, through SITLA, is also the owner of certain adjoining property more particularly described in the Development Agreement (“Adjoining Property”). C. Capitalized terms included herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to the term in the Development Agreement. D. State trust lands managed by SITLA are not subject to municipal planning and zoning regulation pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 10-9a-304, absent consent by SITLA, which may be granted, withheld or withdrawn by SITLA in its discretion. E. Developer and SITLA have entered into a certain SITLA Lease and Development Agreement, as amended, by which Developer is authorized and empowered to seek and obtain development approvals from the City, including the entitlements described herein. F. Use and development of the Property may occur in accordance with and as provided for in the Moab City Code (“City Code”) as well as all other applicable laws and regulations of the City of Moab (“Moab City Laws”), subject to the provisions of the Utah Municipal Land Use, Development and Management Act, Utah Code Ann. § 10-9a-101 et seq, including section 10-9a-304 thereof. G. Developer has pursued certain planning and zoning approvals with the City of Moab (“City”) concerning the Property, which SITLA has authorized and granted its consent from time to time H. The planning and zoning approvals include the annexation of the Property (“Annexation”) into the City, which occurred in accordance with the Moab City Laws and applicable provisions of Utah law, as more specifically described in Exhibit “A”. The planning and zoning approvals for the Property also included the zoning of the Property (“Rezoning”) in the City’s Sensitive Area Resort Zone (“SAR”) as provided for in the City Code and the Moab City Laws. I. The planning and zoning approvals for the Property also included reviews and approvals for a Mixed Use Master Planned Development (“MPD”) for the Lionsback Project, a mixed use project (“Project”), as also more specifically described in Exhibit “A”. J. The approvals granted by the City, including, the Annexation, the Rezoning, and the MPD Approvals, which are collectively referred to as the “City Approvals,” authorized the development of the Project as such approvals were reflected by and described in the City Approvals. As further reflected in the Development Agreement and the Pre-Annexation Agreement, the City approved a period of extended Page 77 of 295 2 vested rights (“Vested Rights”) for the development approvals granted for the Project and Property which ran for 15 years from the date of the Preliminary MPD, through July 27, 2024. K. The Development Agreement further provided that Developer may submit separate development applications associated with the Final MPD for each Phase of the Project (“Final Plat”) and with such filing, the Developer is required to submit a Final Plat and a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) for the Lots, Parcels and associated onsite and offsite Subdivision Improvements (described in the Development Agreement) to be constructed for the particular Phase, which will be consistent with the Lionsback Phasing Plan. The required onsite and offsite infrastructure improvements (“Subdivision Improvements”) for the development in the Project are described in the Development Agreement. L. Developer and SITLA seek to amend certain elements of the City Approvals granted for the Project, as provided for herein (“City Approvals Amendments”) to include a 150 unit hotel complex for Phase One of the MPD. Developer and SITLA contend that the City previously approved the proposed amendments or elements thereof, a contention which the City currently disputes. Developer and SITLA subsequently submitted their application dated June 30, 2016 (“City Approvals Amendments Application”) seeking formal approval of the City Approvals Amendments. The City subsequently informed the Developer and SITLA that City Approvals Amendments Application would be treated as a major change to the Project, based upon provisions of the Master Planned Development Ordinance. Developer and SITLA dispute that the Amendments Application is a major change. The City Approvals Amendments Application remains pending with the City. M. Based upon the dispute described in Recital L, above, SITLA has notified the City, through counsel, of its election to withdraw its consent to local planning and zoning jurisdiction pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 10-9a-304 with respect to the City’s review and action on the City Approvals Amendments Application and ongoing future City review of planning and zoning matters affecting and concerning the Property, which notification is acknowledged by the City. The foregoing notwithstanding, although SITLA maintains that it has the right and authority pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 10-9a-304 to make decisions concerning the use and development of its property without regard to the Moab City Laws and/or the involvement of the City, SITLA recognizes the importance of reasonably coordinating the development of its land with the City and to that end, SITLA has determined to grant its limited consent to local planning and zoning jurisdiction relating to the Property and Project with respect to the City Approvals Amendments, provided that the City review process occurs in the manner provided for herein. N. There exists a potential dispute between the City and SITLA with respect to the extent of prior approvals of amendments to the City Approvals, and with respect to any zoning exemption which SITLA may enjoy, given its prior decision to submit the Property to the land use jurisdiction of the City of Moab and the execution by the Developer, with SITLA approval, of various agreements in conjunction with the City Approvals. By entering into this Agreement the City makes no admission as to the contentions made by SITLA and the Developer, or the scope of any zoning exemption which may be claimed by SITLA, as described in the prefatory recitals, above. O. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement to reflect the manner that the City Approvals Amendments Application as well as future land use applications concerning the Property and the Project would be handled by the Parties. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are hereby incorporated as part of the agreements of the Parties, and for such other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: Page 78 of 295 3 1. Status of City Approvals. Notwithstanding the election by SITLA to withdraw its consent to local planning and zoning jurisdiction relating to the Property and Project pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 10-9a-304, SITLA and Developer agree to comply with the existing terms and conditions of the City Approvals, subject to the pending City Approvals Amendment Application and the other issues addressed herein. It is acknowledged and agreed by the Parties that the terms and conditions of the City Approvals in effect as of the Effective Date, shall remain in full force and effect. It is further acknowledged and agreed that the City is fully compliant with all commitments, terms, and conditions extant in the City Approvals as of the Effective Date. 2. City Approvals Amendments. 2.1. An amendment to the MPD Approvals is governed by the amendment procedures set forth in Section 17.65.130 of the City Code and is handled as either a Major Amendment (which are reviewed and acted upon by the City Council and/or the City Planning Commission) or Minor Amendment (which are reviewed and acted upon by the Moab City planning department staff). 2.2. SITLA consents to the City’s exercise of its local planning and zoning jurisdiction relating to the Property and Project with respect to the review and action on the City Approvals Amendment Application, provided that the City Approvals Amendments Application is deemed to be a Minor Amendment, which will be reviewed and acted upon by the Moab City planning department staff (“City Planning Department”) by and through the City Planning Director, not to be unreasonably delayed or conditioned, and which would not require a public hearing. The City Planning Department may impose reasonable conditions upon the approval of the Amendment Application which are generally consistent with the intent expressed in the MPD Approvals, applicable ordinances, and/or the needs of the Project. SITLA and Developer agree to be bound by the results of that minor plan review process, subject to applicable appeal procedures. 2.3. Following the action by the City Planning Department on the City Approvals Amendments Application, the Parties recognize and agree that the Development Agreement must be amended to reflect the changes to the MPD Approvals resulting from the City’s approval of the City Approvals Amendments, which the City agrees to cooperate and assist in drafting and executing, which will not be unreasonably delayed or conditioned. SITLA consents to the Parties execution of an appropriate amendment to the Development Agreement reflecting the approval of the City Approvals Amendment Application. A list of outstanding items related to the final MPD and Plat Approvals is attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated by reference. 3. Provision of Water and Sewer Service to the Property and Project. The City confirms, acknowledges and agrees that the City shall provide municipal water and sewer service to Developer to serve the Project and Property, in form and manner contemplated by the City Approvals, which service will be based upon uniform terms, conditions and specifications as well as on fees and charges uniformly charged to other persons or entities in the City. 4. Special Districts. Developer may elect to form a special tax district or improvement district to finance and fund the cost and expense of the installation, operation, repair and maintenance of any and all privately operated water, sewer, road and utilities serving the Property and Project, which are to be paid for by Developer. City agrees to cooperate and assist Developer in connection with the formation of any such district. It is agreed that the City Approvals shall be modified to provide that all wastewater treatment service lines and equipment within the Property shall be privately owned, operated, and maintained, with the City to assume collection, maintenance, and treatment obligations at a point Page 79 of 295 4 mutually agreed, as designated on the final utility plan approved in connection with Phase One of the Project. 5. Traffic Studies and Related Improvements. Developer, SITLA, and the City agree to confer in good faith with respect to traffic impacts which will be generated in connection with the Amendment Plan which is currently under review, and with respect to traffic improvements (including off-site improvements) which may be necessitated by the Amendment Plan and/or future phases of the Project. An updated traffic impact study prepared by a licensed engineer shall be submitted to the City no later than six (6) months from the date of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the hotel comprising Phase One of the Project. SITLA and Developer agree that the City may require Developer to install additional traffic related improvements: a) in conjunction with future phases of development on the Property; or b) if traffic impacts from Phase One result in unacceptable or dangerous vehicular or pedestrian traffic conditions on roads providing access to the Property. Any additional traffic related improvements which may be required by the City and installed by the Developer in conjunction with the Amendment Plan and/or future phases of the Project must be reasonable and proportional to traffic impacts generated by the development of the Property, as identified by the updated traffic study or other data provided to or considered by the City.. 6. Engineer Review By City. The Parties agree that any engineer reviews to be conducted by the City in connection with the review and approval of plans, plats and other documents submitted by Developer to the City from time to time may be handled by a duly qualified engineer mutually agreed to by the City, Developer and SITLA, which reviews shall occur in a reason manner, not to be unreasonably delayed. 7. Review of Final Plats and Permits. SITLA consents to the City’s exercise of its local planning and zoning jurisdiction with respect to future final plats, permits and other reviews required to be undertaken by the City pursuant to the City Code, which the City agrees will occur administratively by the City Planning Department, without a requirement for a public hearing. The Parties acknowledge and agree that development of improvements on lots in the Project will comply with all applicable building codes as uniformly applied to similar property in the City. 8. Future Amendments to City Approvals. In the event that Developer and SITLA seek to pursue other amendments to the City Approvals and/or to pursue new approvals for the Property and Project, including the Adjoining Property, the Parties shall meet and confer in good faith and discuss the nature and extent of the City review requirements. The City Planning Department may impose reasonable conditions upon the approval of future amendments and new approvals which are generally consistent with the intent expressed in the MPD Approvals, applicable ordinances, and/or the needs of the Project. Such approvals shall not be unreasonably delayed or conditioned, and shall be subject to applicable appeal procedures. 8.9. Indemnification for Legal Costs. In the event that any third party files any litigation challenging the validity or legality of this Zoning Status Agreement, SITLA agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from all attorneys’ fees and litigation costs incurred by the City in connection with such action. In the event that litigation is filed by a third party, SITLA will assume primary defense of such litigation, and the City agrees to cooperate with SITLA in the defense thereof. The City shall retain legal counsel of its choosing in any such dispute. 9.10. Miscellaneous. 9.1 Amendment of Agreement. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be amended from time to time by mutual consent of the original Parties or their successors in interest in writing. Formatted Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering, Tab stops: Not at 1.88" Formatted: Font: 11 pt Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 1", No bullets or numbering Page 80 of 295 5 9.2 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah. The exclusive venue for any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be the courts of Grand County, Utah. 9.3 Performances. Time is of the essence of this Declaration and for the performance of each of the duties and obligations provided herein. 9.4 Severability. Wherever possible, each provision of this Declaration shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law. If any provision of this Declaration shall be found invalid or unenforceable, this shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Declaration, and the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 9.5 No Waiver. Failure of a Party hereto to exercise any right hereunder shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right and shall not affect the right of such Party to exercise at some future time said right or to enforce any other right it may have hereunder. 9.6 Parties’ Representations. In entering into this Agreement, the Parties acknowledge and agree and represent and warrant to each other as follows: (a) that they will perform their duties and obligations in a commercially reasonable and good faith manner and that this commitment is being relied upon by each other Party; and (b) that the Party has actual and express authority to execute this Agreement, has taken all actions necessary to obtain such authorization, the Agreement constitutes a binding obligation of the Party and the person signing below is duly authorized and empowered to execute this Agreement. 9.7 Notices. The contact addresses of the Parties are as follows: LB Moab Land Company, LLC Post Office Box 967 Moab, UT 84532 Cell 970-708-1896 Email: badgermoab@gmail.com City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Attention: City Manager Phone: 435-259-5121 Fax: 435-259-4135 Email: ____________________ State of Utah, acting by and through the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration 675 East 500 South, Suite 500 Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 Attn. Development Group With a Copy to Thomas G. Kennedy, Esquire P.O. Box 3081 Telluride, CO 81435 Phone: (970) 728-2424 Fax: (970) 728-9439 Email: tom@tklaw.net With a Copy to Christopher G. McAnany Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, LLP 744 Horizon Court, Suite 300 Grand Junction, CO 81506 Phone: (970) 241-5500 Fax: (970) 243-7738 Email:mcanany@dwmk.com With a Copy to 9.8 Captions. The captions or headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and in no way define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of any provisions or sections of this Agreement. 9.9 Counterparts; Facsimile. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement, which may be transmitted by canned/email or facsimile signature pages. Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", No bullets or numbering Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", No bullets or numbering Formatted: Normal, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", No bullets or numbering Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", No bullets or numbering Page 81 of 295 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the City of Moab, acting by and through the Moab City Council, which has duly authorized execution, and by a duly authorized representative of Developer, as of the Effective Date. CITY: City of Moab, a Utah municipal corporation By: _____________________________ Date: ____________________ Printed Name: _______________________ Title: ______________________________ SITLA The State of Utah, acting by and through the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration By:__________________________ Date:__________________ Printed Name: ___________________ Title: __________________________ COMPANY: LB Moab Land Company, LLC, a Colorado limited liability Developer By:__________________________ Date:__________________ Printed Name: ___________________ Title: __________________________ Page 82 of 295 7 EXHIBIT A (Annexation and Planning/Zoning Approvals) The Annexation of the Property occurred pursuant to and in accordance with the following documents: (i) City of Moab Ordinance No. 2008-20 (“Annexation Ordinance”) dated December 9, 2008 and recorded on February 23, 2009 in Book 744, Page 407- 423 with the Clerk and Recorder for Grand County, Utah (“Official Records”); (ii) The Pre-Annexation Agreement dated October 28, 2008 and recorded on February 23, 2009 in Book 744, Page 407-423 in the Official Records (“Pre- Annexation Agreement”); and (iii) The Annexation Map recorded February 23, 2009 in Book 744, Page 424 in the Official Records (“Annexation Map”); The Property has received the following planning and zoning approvals (“MPD Approvals”): (i) Concept MPD. At a duly noticed and conducted public hearing/meeting, the City of Moab Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) reviewed and approved the Development Application associated with the Concept Plan/Master Planned Development (“Concept MPD”), subject to conditions stated in the document reflecting the Concept MPD approval. (ii) Preliminary MPD. (a) At a duly noticed and conducted public hearing/meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the Development Application associated with the Preliminary Plan/Master Planned Development (“Preliminary MPD”) to the City of Moab City Council (“City Council”). (b) At a duly noticed and conducted public hearing/meeting, the City Council reviewed and approved the Development Application for the “Lionsback Development Plan” associated with the Preliminary MPD, subject to conditions stated in the document reflecting the Preliminary MPD approval (a copy of which is on file with the City). (c) The City, Developer and SITLA executed a certain Development and Phasing Agreement for Lionsback Resort dated July 28, 2009 (“Development Agreement”). The Development and Phasing Agreement, among other things, included the “Lionsback Development Plan” as reflected in the Development Approvals is on file with the City, approved the proposed land use and phasing plan for the Project and noted the allocation of infrastructure improvements required for the Project. (d) The Development Agreement incorporated an approved Phasing Plan for the Property as well as the Adjoining Property and Project. Developer contemplates that the Project will consist of five phases (each a “Phase”). The Lionsback Phasing Plan depicts the Phases for the Project and establishes the Lots, Parcels, uses and Subdivision Improvements (defined below) for the Project. Page 83 of 295 1 EXHIBIT B___ Outstanding items related to Final MPD & Plat Submittal 1. Conceptual Landscape Plan: a. The Approved Preliminary MPD landscape plan/guideline is not proposed to change in overall context and intent. With the change to the area directly surrounding the hotel, Developer will supply a conceptual landscape plan specific to the anticipated areas impacted by the hotel site construction. b. Areas impacted by the roadway, utility, and casita construction will follow the native vegetation and restoration guidelines previously approved. 2. Signage Plan: a. Directional/wayfinding signage as well as proposed monument signage will be submitted to city planning staff for approval. b. Building signage is dependent on hotel operator and will be submitted for approval as part of Final MPD Application. 3. Lighting Plans: a. Site lighting fixture detail sheets noting the height, details, and specifications for each of the proposed fixture types (parking lots, trails, & roadways) will be submitted for review by staff. Final light locations will be determined at Final MPD and submitted for final review. b. Building Lighting Fixtures will be submitted for review/approval as part of Final MPD and Building Permit Issuance process. c. Developer agrees that fully shielded cut-off fixtures will be required and no ‘up-lighting’ will be allowed to insure dark sky intent is met. 4. Hotel Elevations: a. Detailed Building Elevations (including height) will be submitted as part of the Final MPD. The height varies due to the terrain and proposed grading on the parcel. Developer intends to build the hotel ‘into’ the site to minimize the height as much as possible. The height will comply with the SAR Zone of a 30’. 5. Utility Plans: a. Conceptual utility plans were submitted to Moab City Engineers Office in November and December 2015. These will be supplemented with a narrative explaining utility service structure (private, sewer district, etc.) b. Final Utility Plans will be submitted to Moab City for approval as part of Final MPD. 6. Traffic: a. The revised trip generation letter (dated 9/13/2016) noted no major impacts from the changes regarding Phase One of the Hotel & Casitas and is sufficient for development & approval of Phase 1 of the Lionsback Final MPD and Plat. b. Prior to final approval of Phase 2 of the Lionsback MPD and associated plats; the previously approved Traffic Impact Study will be updated to include the changed street classifications (Sand Flats Road, Mill Creek Drive, 400 East, and 300 South) as well as updated counts at Sand Flats, Mill Creek Drive, and 400 East Intersections per city request. 7. Grading & Drainage: a. Detailed grading & drainage plans & calculations will be submitted for approval as part of Final MPD and Plat approval. Plans and Calculations will meet Grand County Storm Drainage requirements. 8. Geotechnical Report: a. An Updated Geotechnical report will be submitted with Final MPD Submittal for each phase of development. Page 84 of 295 Page 85 of 295 II Barbara R. Butler William S. DeFord William H.T. Frey Nathan A. Keever Richard 1-1. Krohn Michael A. Kuzminski* Christopher G. McAnany* Annie D. Murphy*"· John R. Pierce+ Sam D. Starritt-¢> Laird T. Milburn Of Counsel Jlll T. Norris Of Counsel Joseph H. Skinner Of Counsel D. J. Dufford {1910-1998) William G. Waldeck (!923-2009) 1 Also admi!ted in Oregon ! Also admitted in Texas " Also admitted in Utah ~ Also admitted in Wisconsin ,¢,-Also admi1ted in \Vyoming GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 744 Horizon Court Suite 300 Grand Junction Colorado, 81506 Tel. 970.241.5500 Fax 970.243.7738 DUFFORD WALDECK MILBURN & KROHN LLP Attorneys at Law Thomas G. Kennedy, Esq. P.O. Box 3081 Telluride, CO 81435 September 12, 2016 Christopher G. McAnany Direct Dial Phone: (970) 248-5862 Email Address: mcanany@dwm~.com Re: By: Lionsback Resort, Moab Utah, Amended MPD Application Email, tom@tklaw.net and First Class Mail Dear Tom: I write to respond to the letter of LB Moab Land LLC, dated August 12, 2016, and concerning the proposed amended plan for the Lionsback Resort. I was asked to review the proposal discussed in a meeting between the parties in which, among other things, Moab LB would agree to delete lots from its Phase 5 of the development to offset the increase in lodging rooms associated with the newly proposed first phase hotel concept, which calls for a 150 room hotel (referred to here as the "Deletion Option"). Concurrently, I understand that on June 30, 2016 Moab LB submitted an application for amendment of the approved preliminary master planned development for the project. That application includes the larger hotel concept along with utility changes, but without the deletion of units described as the Deletion Option. The initial question was whether this concept would qualify as a "minor change" under the City's Master Planned Development Ordinance, MMC § 17.65.130. Although a revised plan containing the Deletion Option has not been submitted for review, I conclude that the scope of the changes contemplated under either scenario would likely be major changes under the Moab ordinance. MMC § 17.65.130 provides that amendments "that change the character, basic design, building density and intensity, open space or any other requirements and conditions" require planning commission review and approval. The "minor change" provision, subsection A, allows staff approval of minor changes "in the location and placement of buildings" where these are the product of unforeseen circumstances-such as engineering difficulties. Changes as to "structural types" and the "arrangement of multiple lots and blocks," or the Page 86 of 295 Thomas Kennedy September 12, 2016 Page 2 "overall design or intent of the project" are major changes requiring land use authority approval. Id. at B. Given the scope of the changes under either the Deletion Option or the June 30 submittal, it is my conclusion that this project should be processed as a "major change" under Section 130. Under either proposal the applicant would be substantially changing the configuration, building types, phasing, and total square footage of the structures. These are not minor changes due, for example, to site constrains. As you know, under Utah law municipalities are bound to adhere to their own land use ordinances. Although a minor change might appear to be expedient, in my opinion that would run contrary to the Moab ordinance. Similarly, attempting to process this application as a minor change would likely invite a legal challenge by other interested persons. Thus, there is both a legal reason and a practical reason to treat this as a major change. Given the past litigation history as to this project, the parties should use care to follow the review processes to the letter. In making this determination I do not express any opinion as to the merits of the project. We concur that, regardless of the submittal Moab LB elects to pursue, the parties will need to make changes to the Development Agreement, Annexation Agreement, and related plans and specifications. If for any reason you disagree with this position please feel free to provide me with any additional information upon which you rely. Note also that City staff is available to confer with your client as to submittals and review processes. Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, LLP xc: Rebecca Davidson SITLA Properties in Moab Page 87 of 295 Lionsback ZONING/ENTITLEMENT STATUS Page 88 of 295 Approval History 2006: LB Moab Land & SITLA enter into a Development Lease on Lionsback Property 2006 –2008: LB Moab Land works through design, entitlement, and annexation process into the City of Moab October 28, 2008: Lionsback Resort receives approval for the land to be annexed. The City of Moab approves 188 Single Family Lots, 18 employee housing units, and a 50-Unit Hotel (Entitlements are valid for 15yrs) 2008 –2012: Moab City is sued by an environmental group over the entitlement & annexation process. Late 2012: Utah State Court of Appeals issues ruling in favor of the City of Moab and the lawsuit is dismissed. Page 89 of 295 Approval History 2013: LB Moab and SITLA enter discussions about the Moab Real Estate Market and as well as timing to re-launch the project and proceed with the more detailed planning & engineering. Sept. 2013: LB Moab meet with City Staff and Mayor to present revised concept of project. Staff indicated that it would be a minor (staff approval) amendment. 2014: Off-site infrastructure engineering is coordinated and negotiated with adjacent land owners. Market/feasibility Study is completed and the development program is modified to focus on the resort aspects of the project. City Staff confirm that no additional approvals are required to modify the approved 50-room lodge to a 50 Unit Hotel with separate ‘lock-out’ bedrooms. Page 90 of 295 Approval History 2015: Design & Preconstruction work is completed and submitted late in 2015 to Moab City for review. 2016: Moab City goes through staffing changes. The then City Manager requests that the project be reheard by the planning commission as a Major Amendment. Due to the legal history on the project, SITLA & LB Moab voiced concern about having delays, especially as the project is ready to proceed with final approvals for Phase 1. SITLA & City staff have drafted the Zoning Status Agreement as a way for Moab City to retain control of the final stages on the project. Page 91 of 295 Comparison of Plans 2008 APPROVED PLAN •188 Residential Lots/Units •50 Lodge/Commercial lots/Units •(No limits on # of Bedrooms) •18 Employee/Work Force Housing Units •73.35% of property retained in Open Space •128.45 Acres •Based on SAR Zoning –Project Maximum could have resulted in as much as 402 Units PROPOSED AMENDMENT •188 Residential Lots/Casita Units •50 Unit Resort Hotel •(3 Bedrooms Max per Unit, 150 rooms total) •18 Employee/Work Force Housing Units •73.09% of property retained in Open Space •128.0 Acres Page 92 of 295 Page 93 of 295 H OTE L FOOTPRINT, PARK ING AR EA, BEFO RE 41,360SF" 38,760 SF (104 SPACES) • A FTER 81,668 SF 90,160 SF (230 SPACES ) LB Moab Land LLC • DRAWING NOTE· AN D FOOTPR INTS .A IN TH IS SE T. AR E DERIVED ~~:~~~~~RE :i~l~~~Ts;:~~i~~~~~~~~~~:rR O US ENTITL ED SUBMITTAL iu~D BE VERIFIED PER PREVI· TH ER ARCHITECT. :.-... "'" ~wt !!W"Wl U•DT SR :U:1m in.• =':r._uiultl Ill :-:!: .. ~= • flll)SIJWOflll ..... :l":fl111t It.I» -·-i 1=11: ~~:U.U.iGIT ... -=--~· a.m !~11.ll~lllllf ., • ... l~Rff -·-~...al:" LIONSBACK H MOAB, UTAH OT $=~ 1· -1150'-o· o 80 .60 APPROVED PRELIMINAR~l~~~~ACK RESORT DEVE LO~ ~-:NLTA N NED PLAN Hl<S Page 94 of 295 LB Mob a Land LLC 0 "' .. 0 .. m [I/ q) I[} q) "'""'' ~ MOAB, u ~~I( HOTEL I 11£so PHAS£5 _il'\ IIT ,. 32o'o-() ~IIQ,J .. H~ HILL s GLAZIER sruo,o Zoning Status Agreement WHAT THE AGREEMENT DOES: •Enforces SITLA’s right to withdrawl from local planning & zoning approvals pursuant to Utah Code Ann. 10-9a-304 related to the Minor or Major Amendment of the Lionsback Master Development Plan. •Approves the proposed Minor amendment to the Master Development Plan. •Insures that other typical city approvals and processes will be followed, such as: •Final Platting •Utility Permitting •Building Permitting •Puts in place timeframes and conditions when future studies, reports, and approvals will be required of the developer and SITLA. THE AGREEMENT DOES NOT: •Approve density above what is allowed by the SAR Zoning on the property •Circumvent typical city final platting/permitting requirements •Change the conditions of Approval •The Cities Source Water Protection Plan is NOT effected by the Amended Plan. Page 95 of 295 Page 96 of 295 Page 97 of 295 Google Groups Fwd: Slide 55 Lionsback Presentation Rani  Derasary  <rderasary@moabcity.org>Feb 2, 2017 1:19 PM Posted in group: City  Council Hi all, Denver  Perkins, a City resident who lives on 300S, attended the Lionsback briefing yesterday and sent me the question below. Chris, Amy and Jeff, could one of you respond to him? Thanks! If you can copy the Council that would be great. I too would like to understand who pays the other part of improvements in question if the Company and/or Project Assn only pay a portion (and what happens in the event of bankruptcy etc - see below). Thanks! Rani ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: denver perkins  <denperk@me.com> Date: Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:44 PM  Subject: Slide 55 Lionsback Presentation To: rderasary@moabcity.org  Cc: denver perkins <denperk@me.com> The file named Lionsback  Presentation that we saw this afternoon has this as  slide number 55.  Findings: 1. The Project is believed to be mutually acceptable to the parĕes  and consistent with the City of Moab Code. 2. Desir able open space areas are being retained and important  trails and recreaĕonal resour ces preserved. 3. The Project is expect ed to generate substan ĕal tax revenues and  economic benefits  for the City. 4. The design, cons trucĕon and maintenance of the Subdivision  Improvemen ts shall be undertaken and/or funded in whole or in  part  by the Company and /or Project Associaĕon through   infrastructur e funding mechanisms.Page 98 of 295 5. The Project will be subject to the provisions of the City of Moab  Code. The part that caught my eye was sentence #4.  Maybe I should know this, but if the design, construction and maintenance of the project is funded in part by the Company and/or Project Association, who funds the rest of it?  Can the city of Moab be compelled to pay for any of the construction, etc. if the developers only pay part? Bill Love had a great point. If they go bankrupt, who will pay for the maintenance of half half-built or empty  structures that have already been built? That to me is a real concern. If the company goes bankrupt, can they leave a ghost town of half-finished buildings for the city of Moab to maintain—for  the next few decades? Thank you for taking the time to think about this. I know you have a lot to do, and if this is a distraction, please don’t worry about it. I sent myself a copy so I don’t have to find it again I mis-send it. Denver --  Rani  Derasary, Member Moab  City  Council cell: 435-210-1647 email: rderasary@moabcity.org Page 99 of 295 Carmella Galley <carmella@moabcity.org> (no subject)  David  Everitt  <deveritt@moabcity.org>Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:26 PM To: Carmella Galley  <carmella@moabcity.org> Begin forwarded message: From: Barb Zinn <barbzinn@gmail.com> Subject: SITLA proposal  to  hold  closed  meetings  on  Lionsback Date: January  4, 2017 at  8:46:57 AM MST To: city-council@moabcity.org  It is  totally  inappropriate to hold a closed meeting with just  two council members  at a time.  This  is  a bald effort to avoid a quorum. This situation does not fall under the categories  listed in the Utah Open Meetings Act  regulations 52-4-204 and 52-4-205.  Do not allow this. Barbara Zinn 460 Rosetree Lane Moab UT 84532 435 259 4077 --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/CACuVtaQ5x8Hp-M7Umbdx-s4MOG5EE2PgiLdHX%2BTByS4SQ-BOeQ%40mail.gmail.com. Begin forwarded message: From: William Love <sombra@frontiernet.net> Subject: Water  Source Protection  Plan  Lionsback  Date: January  6, 2017 at  10:44:45 AM MST To: David Everitt <deveritt@moabcity.org>  Cc: city-council@moabcity.org  The Lionsback Water Source Protection Plan may  not have been prepared by a qualified person or company.  I am especially  concerned that there is  no reference to any  analytical data in the report or signature on the report.  Please advise source of  the Water Source Protection Plan.  The on site  processing of  sewage by the developer is  a major change in watershed protection. Bill Love Begin forwarded message: From: Renee Troutt  <renee@insuremoab.com>  Subject: Moab  Lionsback Resort Date: January  23, 2017 at 2:28:15 PM MST To: <city-council@moabcity.org>  Attn: Moab City Council   Re: Moab Lionsback Resort   Page 100 of 295 I would like to take this opportunity to offer my  support for the Moab Lionsback Resort development application.  I have examined the plans and project description and am familiar with the site.  I believe the resort is well suited for the area and could offer our visitors a great luxury experience they are not able to get at other resorts in the area.      Michael Badger has worked tirelessly since 2004 to get the project off the ground.  He has experienced many setbacks and has complied with the requirements and legal issues set before him.  It’s time to get this project off the ground.  I hope you will consider this project for approval.   Sincerely,   Renee Troutt   --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/009501d275bf%249bec3e80%24d3c4bb80%24%40com. Begin forwarded message: From: William Love <sombra@frontiernet.net> Subject: Moab  City Can  Reverse Annexation  of Lionsback Property Date: January  6, 2017 at  10:20:55 AM MST To: city-council@moabcity.org  Cc: Editor Times Independent <editor@moabtimes.com>, "zlevine@grandcountyutah.net" <zlevine@grandcountyutah.net>, John Weisheit <john@livingrivers.org>, Editor Moab Sun News <editor@moabsunnews.com>, council@grandcountyutah.net Moab City Can Reverse Annexation of Lionsback Property    Attached are the Lionsback’s  2008 Pre Annexation Agreement  (PAA)and the Lionsback  2009  Development and Phasing Agreement.( DPA)  Both agreements are between Moab City and the developer of the property LB Moab Land Company LLC.  In both agreements the developer has clearly stated that they intend to develop the Lionsback property in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations of the City of Moab (Section F –DPA and 1.6, 2.2.3, 2.2.8 PAA).  A default in the 2008 Pre Annexation Agreement by the Developer refusal to accept Moab City's Land Use Code  will allow  Moab City to enforce Section 9.4 Default and Remedies.  This section allows Moab City “Suspension or termination of annexation of the property”, “withhold permits”, “discontinue service” and “commence proceedings to disconnect the property from the city”.  Moab City can also refuse to supply Water and Sewer Services as required under Section 3 of the Agreement.  At the next City Council meeting the developer needs to confirm his commitment to these contracts.  Nothing should be done to approve the request to increase thePage 101 of 295 size of the hotel until the Developer confirms his commitment to abide by Moab City’s Land Use Code.  Note: The above comments are my interpretation of the agreements.  Moab City needs to review all of the above with their attorney and also review with the attorney all other actions available to counter SITLA’s intimidations. Moab City needs to have any  other developer using SITLA property confirm they will abide by the Land Use Code.  This is especially important for USU.  Bill Love 2871 E Bench Rd  Moab, Utah 84532     --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/20170106172242.9F26CADBCC%40filter03.dlls.pa.frontiernet.net. Begin forwarded message: From: Bob-Margie Read <bread1@comcast.net> Subject: REJECT the SITLA Request for  Private Meetings  on  Lionsback  with  City  Council Date: January  5, 2017 at  1:40:27 PM MST To: Moab City  <city-council@moabcity.org>  Cc: Grand County  Council <council@grandcountyutah.net>, Zacharia Levine <zlevine@grandcountyutah.net>, Amy  Weiser <aweiser@moabcity.org>  Please REJECT the SITLA request for a meeting with 2 council members at a time.  This request makes the meeting "Private" and should Not be allowed. There is something "Really Smelly" about this whole deal, Back Door Dealing, etc.  What members of the Utah State Government are "Benefactors" of this deal? In addition, Please insure that the Grand County Council and the Water, Sewer & Disposal Districts members, Plus the Public, are in Full attendance at this meeting and are allowed to speak, ask questions and comment on any statements that the SILTA reps. make. This matter has a Big Effect on the culinary water for all of Spanish Valley and should be Fully vetted in Public. Bob Read 195 E 100 S Moab, UT 84532 --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/1903007055.80096867.1483648827349.JavaMail.zimbra%40comcast.net. Page 102 of 295 Begin forwarded message: From: Barb Zinn <barbzinn@gmail.com> Subject: Lionsback Resolution  36-2016 Date: December 12, 2016 at 8:01:17 AM MST To: city-council@moabcity.org  Moab City  should not approve Resolution 36-2016 without a public hearing, since this  is a major change to the original Lionsback proposal. As Grand Country  did with Cloudrock, Moab City  needs  to stand up to SITLA and not allow them to dictate what is  permitted. Consider the Water Conservation Plan to be presented tomorrow: Lionsback will be a huge impact to the aquifer. It is  inappropriate to commit to any kind of sewer service during the moratorium. The access  road will not be adequate to either the development  or the public. Table this  Resolution and hold a public  hearing.    Sincerely, Barbara Zinn 259-4077 --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city-council/ CACuVtaS3m3n5d2a11tSVpDSn_PaR-CO5xiYVoTpDS8Qx8L-wSw%40mail.gmail.com.  Begin forwarded message: From: John Knight <jlknight30@gmail.com> Subject: Lionsback Resort Date: January  5, 2017 at  5:29:56 PM MST To: city-council@moabcity.org  To whom it may  concern - My name is  John Knight and I  live at  284 McGill Ave, Moab UT 84532. As  an active environmentalist, and renewable energy developer, I want to express  my full support for the Lionsback  project. The development team for the resort has gone through tremendous  efforts to ensure that they  are developing a project that will create good, sustainable jobs  for the Moab and the community. While there are some understandable environmental and civil concerns  associated with the project, it is  still a good project that will be good for Moab. This project is  close to town, reduces urban sprawl (which we are suffering from), is  off  of  an existing major road that  is already highly impacted by  traffic, limits viewshed damage from the valley  and will provide economic diversity  for our community. I  hope the city  will vote in favor of this  project. Sincerely, John Knight (503) 860-8903 --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city-council/ CABEBDQqgB3bnbwH5wAvDu2iAmzWj%3Dh57GE170FWaRJW1zCYtdA%40mail.gmail.com.  Begin forwarded message: Page 103 of 295 From: William Love <sombra@frontiernet.net> Subject: SITLA Requests  Private Meetings  on  Lionsback with  Council Date: January  3, 2017 at  8:56:17 AM MST To: city-council@moabcity.org  Moab City has received a letter from SIITLA asking for  meetings on Lionsback with 2 Council members at a time. These meetings  would exclude the public. This request is unethical and is borderline illegal.  Please reject this request from SITLA  Bill Love --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/20170103155639.2783A79C9A%40filter01.roch.ny.frontiernet.net.  Begin forwarded message: From: William Love <sombra@frontiernet.net> Subject: Resolution  36-2016 Lionsback Development Date: December 11, 2016 at 2:34:17 PM MST  To: city-council@moabcity.org  Please Distribute  Moab City should not approve Resolution 36­2016 without a public hearing. This is a major change to the original Lionsback proposal.  SITLA's threats and bullying should not be tolerated by the Moab Council.    Moab City controls the water, sewer and access road to the development.    The access road is a not capable of meeting the needs of the development. The traffic has increased significantly in the last 10 years and the Sandflats campground is full on most summer weekends. The road must be upgraded by the developer prior to any construction. SITLA proposal that a four lane road is needed from the old city dump to the hotel and an unsafe two lane road is needed to travel into town does not make sense. The safety of Moab residents and tourist should come before the desires of SITLA.  Grand County called SITLA’s bluff with Cloudrock by saying that the county would not provide occupancy permits after homes were sold unless they met Grand County Codes.  SITLA backed down and decide to accept Grand County Codes.  The USGS water study has said the Glen Canyon Aquifer does not have the 13,000 acre feet of water flowing into the Colorado River that was going to be used for future large projects such as Lionsback.  Approving any changes to Lionsback that require a large quantity of water sometime in the future may require expenditures of millions of dollars by the city for processing. The City should not jeopardize the possibility of having a USU campus by allocating our last cheap water from the Glen Canyon Aquifer to SITLA.  Moab City does not have the money for alternative sources of water without a contribution from developments such as Lionsback.  No commitment should be made until the USGS water study is completed in 2017.  Page 104 of 295 There is a moratorium on sewer connections.  The City cannot commit to any type of sewer service until at least 6 months and probably up to two years until after the new plant is operating.  Moab City has many reasons to tell SITLA that a major or minor increase in hotel units cannot be approved at this time.  Bill Love  2871 E Bench Rd  Moab, Utah 84532  --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/20161211213433.4B6D266819%40filter03.dlls.pa.frontiernet.net.  Begin forwarded message: From: William Love <sombra@frontiernet.net> Subject: Road  to  Lionsback is a Death  Trap   Date: December 10, 2016 at 10:49:02 AM MST To: city-council@moabcity.org  Cc: council@grandcountyutah.net, Editor Moab Sun News  <editor@moabsunnews.com>, "zlevine@grandcountyutah.net" <zlevine@grandcountyutah.net> Please Distribute  Road to LionsBack Resort will be a Death Trap for Bicycles   The road to Sandflats and the proposed Lionsback resort is steep and passes through a narrow dugway through a hill that has no room for a shoulder.  The road is currently used by families on bicycles who cannot easily negotiate the steep road next to the edge of the road.  Many bicycles riders take an entire lane as they try to navigate through the dug way.  Construction of Lionsback will require large trucks to transport materials to the building site.  Many of the trucks will be fully loaded and cannot stop on a steep hill for bicycle riders trying to navigate the steep area in the narrow dugway on the road.  Moab City was negligent in prior years in approving Lionsback without requiring the developer to provide safer access to the Sandflats area.  Moab City should not consider enlarging or even approving construction of Lionsback prior to having the developer provide safe access for all users of the access road to Lionsback  .    Bill Love  Note: SITLA tried to ignore Grand County’s Land Use Code during planning for Cloudrock.  Grand County told SITLA that the county would not provide occupancy permits to buyers of homes that did not meet the county land use code.  Nobody wanted to go to court and SITLA agreed to using the county’s codes.   SITLA’s greed should not come before the safety of Grand County residents or tourist.  Page 105 of 295 --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/20161210174915.E36DE17999B%40filter02.dlls.pa.frontiernet.net. Begin forwarded message: From: William Love <sombra@frontiernet.net> Subject: EPA Review  of Lionsback  Pollution  of  City's  Aquifer   Date: January  1, 2017 at  11:41:55 AM MST  To: city-council@moabcity.org  Cc: council@grandcountyutah.net, "zlevine@grandcountyutah.net" <zlevine@grandcountyutah.net> Please Distribute  The City of Moab in 2008 asked the EPA to review the problems associated with possible pollution of ground water by the Lionsback Development.   The attached report is based on the EPA’s designation of the Glen Canyon Aquifers as Moab City’s Sole Source Aquifer. The EPA concerns for possible pollution of Moabs City's drinking water by a 50 room hotel are only increased by the current proposal to increase the size of the hotel to 150 rooms.  The attached report clearly states that:  “Because the Glen Canyon Aquifer System is exposed at the surface within the delineated Drinking Water Source Protection Zones, it is not protected from potential contaminants spilled on the ground”   “In order to protect the City against potential problems that are difficult to regulate, it may be possible to require a bond for the developments. Regulators require this of mining and other types of projects. If the aquifer becomes contaminated, the City of Moab and Grand County Water and Sewer Agency will be left with the expense of treating the water in perpetuity. It can be very expensive”   The EPA review was completed in late  2008 after most of the review of the Lionsback project was completed and probably did not receive adequate attention by the council.  The report made suggestions and asked several questions that need to be reviewed prior to consideration of approving any agreement with SITLA. Increasing the size of the development by three times will also increase the possibility of pollution of the Glen Canyon Aquifer by three times.  Bill Love   2871 E Bench Rd  Moab, Utah 84532  --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/20170101184218.6774C17959E%40filter02.dlls.pa.frontiernet.net.  Begin forwarded message:Page 106 of 295 From: William Love <sombra@frontiernet.net> Subject: Question  for  Lionsback  Meeting  Feb. 1,2017 Date: January  28, 2017 at 4:08:20 PM MST To: city-council@moabcity.org  Does  the city  moratorium for commercial developments  apply to Lionsback's request for 150 hotel rooms and sewer plant on the aquifer? Bill love --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/20170128230846.0F02587614%40filter01.dlls.pa.frontiernet.net. Begin forwarded message: From: David McLean <mclean777@gmail.com> Subject: LIONSBACK RESORT DEVELOPMENT Date: December 10, 2016 at 3:54:41 PM MST To: city-council@moabcity.org  Dear Kyle, Rani, Heila, Kalen, and Tawny,    Please vote against any approval action concerning the proposed Lionsback Resort Development until adequate public hearings can be scheduled and held following this holiday season.  In the spirit of transparency, the citizens of Moab Valley deserve the opportunity to voice their concerns or approval of this major development. The Lionsback Resort Development, with its 150‑room hotel, 220 vacation homes/nightly rentals, and 30 employee housing units probably presents the single‑most impact on Moab Valley than any other project underway or planned in the foreseeable future.  The impacts are significant: Sewer: An obvious major impact based on the number of units, not to mention the “car           wash facility.  Did we not just pass a moratorium on future commercial hook‑ups? Page 107 of 295 Road:  During the construction phases alone, Sand Flats Road will become a virtual ‘death trap’.  The hikers, bikers, OHV drivers, tour groups in hummers and jeeps, and citizens who frequent the recycle center,  land fill, and Sand Flats Recreation Area will be ‘road fodder’ for the construction vehicles on this narrow, twisty road. Water:  This development will be another major user of water, water that may or may not be available. Visual:  Lionsback Resort will be a visual sore, the first major blight, on the East Rim even during the day.  The impact at night, however, will certainly light up Moab Valley more than we can imagine. Please table this issue until our community has a chance to voice its opinions.     Sincerely, Dave McLean Moab  --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/CAMSikYNB%2B3XfFmQj5akbqDOv3RUYhPGDTgi%3DtncsHKNhG0sP%2BQ%40mail. gmail.com. Begin forwarded message: From: "Jeff Pillus" <jeffp@setengineering.com>  Subject: Lionsback Resort Date: January  26, 2017 at 10:52:19 AM MST To: <city-council@moabcity.org>  Dear City  Council:   Page 108 of 295 I  am a licensed civil engineer and have dedicated my  career to land planning in the southwestern US.  This experience has given me a thorough understanding of the impacts of projects  and actions  of planning entities.  The consequences  of land planning decisions are often misunderstood.  To say the Lionsback project is  “good” or “bad” for the community requires  a thorough understanding of regional trends  as  well as historical data from similar communities.    Moab is  a desirable place to live and therefore will continue to grow.  If  properly  guided, growth can bring long term economic  benefits to the community  while minimizing environmental impacts.  If  the City  of Moab chooses to restrict  additional housing and accommodations, visitors  and residents will migrate to the nearest  available location.  This  is  detrimental to the community  in several ways.  First, forcing visitors or residents  to commute to amenities  or work, causes adverse pressures  on both the local infrastructure and environment by  increasing traffic, sprawl, parking shortages, and emissions.  I am genuinely concerned that the recent opposition to hospitality projects  in Moab is  causing an overflow of land development to the south in Spanish Valley.  We have seen a significant uptick  in land development projects  south of Moab while development in the City  has waned.  We will observe a substantial increase in traffic  on Highway 191 in the coming years  due to more people living and staying south of town rather than in the City.  The second impact is  an increased parking demand in the City as  people drive from the south valley.  Third, is an increase in unregulated camping on public  lands.  Campers  colonize new areas of public land, then drive to the city  for restaurants, groceries, etc.  The short sighted answer is  to build a wider straighter highway with more off-street parking.  Although this  option is  often popular to local communities, its impacts, which include people driving more and further, greatly  outweighs  the benefits.       For further information please see the links below titled  “Induced Demand” and “High Cost of Free Parking.” Please take the time to study these subjects  further as  you will find that the prohibition of growth is often damaging in the long term.  I  would be happy  to speak  on the subject if the Council, Planning Commission, and City  staff is  interested in hearing more.  The public  may  not  immediately support decisions that  allow development, but smart growth is the responsible decision that needs to be made and understood.  It is  essential that we guide inevitable growth so that it  occurs near popular activity  centers such as  Sand Flats  Recreation Area.      I  am respectfully  requesting your support  for the Lionsback Project as it  is a well-planned mixed use community near the amenities  where people want to be.  It is  smart growth.    Respectfully,   Jeff Pillus   Reference articles: Induced Demand: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demand High cost of free parking: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/business/economy/15view.html?_r=0     --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/01e901d277fc%24f1d110c0%24d5733240%24%40setengineering.com.  Begin forwarded message: From: "Jeff's Personal E-mail" <jeffpeterson@frii.com>  Subject: Lionsback Resort Project Date: January  6, 2017 at  2:54:52 PM MST To: <city-council@moabcity.org>  To the City  Council for the City  of  Moab:   I  represent the ownership of a parcel of property  within the vicinity of the Lionsback Resort  project and I would like to weigh in with my support for this  project.    I  have followed project for the last several years  and feel the City’s approval for the project is  and has been in place for some time now.  The plan for the project, as  it was  rightfully  approved, is done in veryPage 109 of 295 good taste and addresses the concerns  for the local environment  and aesthetics.   The minor recent changes  that Lionsback has  designed into their project will only  improve the overall aesthetics  of the project, the design conforms to the SAR zoning and seems to fit well within their existing approvals.       With the added benefit of the improvements  to Sand Flats Road that will be accomplished and the additional employment that will be generated from this project, the city  and area should benefit tremendously from this project.    This  project should be allowed to move forward expeditiously.   Sincerely, Jeff Peterson       --  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups  "City  Council" group.  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city- council+unsubscribe@moabcity.org.  To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.  To view this  discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city- council/011901d26867%2482ebd720%2488c38560%24%40frii.com.  3 attachments Lionsback  development  and  phasing  agreement 2009.pdf 1850K Lionsback  Pre-Annexation  Agreement 2008.pdf 2611K EPAFinalMoabMemo30September2008.pdf  157K Page 110 of 295 Page 111 of 295 1AM PRO SN W 100% RENEWABLE, 100% DOABLE January 20, 2017 Mayor David Sakrison 217 E. Center St. Moab, Utah 84532 Re: I AM PRO SNOW 100% Committed Partnership Letter Agreement Dear Mayor David Sakrison, On behalf of The Climate Reality Project, a District of Columbia, USA, nonprofit corporation ("Climate Reality," "we" or "us"), I am delighted to welcome the City of Moab, Utah as an official partner ("Partner" or ''you") for the I AM PRO SNOW 100% Committed Campaign as defined below (the "Partnership") under the terms of this letter agreement {"Agreement"). Climate change threatens the lives and livelihoods of our winter sports and mountain communities and our snow is disappearing in many places around the world. Many winter industries are taking a heavy hit from the impacts of climate change, with bare peaks, shrinking winter seasons, and warmer winters fast becoming a reality for mountain communities everywhere. For these reasons, you and we wish to rally ski resorts, towns, businesses, and other institutions to commit to be powered by 100% renewable electricity (the "Campaign"). Here is how the Partnership works: • You join a global movement of committed ski resorts, towns, cities, businesses, governments, and organizations by pledging to be powered by 100% renewable electricity and working with us to to build support for real climate solutions in the winter industry community. • You gather commitments from individuals by sharing the 100% Committed sign-up pledge (the "Individual Pledge") with your members and supporters found at https://v.,.'ww.climaterealicyprojccLorg/content/road-100- individual-plcdue. • You give us your draft strategic plan to reach your goal of being powered by 100% renewable electricity by 2030 or as soon as possible within six (6) months of signing this Agreement as set forth in the Renewable Electricity Roadmap attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. • You promote the Campaign at least one (I) time per month on your social media and digital platforms, if available, referencing the fact that you and we are working together on the Campaign. • You promote the Partnership with at least one ( 1) press release referencing that you and we are working together on the Campaign. • You commit to assist additional ski resorts, towns, businesses, or other institutions to commit to be powered by 100% renewable electricity. • You display, on your webpage, our name and logo, option as shown in Exhibit B, in connection with the Campaign. Page 112 of 295 • We include your organization's name and logo across I AM PRO SNOW's 100% Committed digital platforms including (if available) the website, press kit, and social media toolkit. • We provide graphics for your use in promoting the Campaign on your social media and digital platforms. • We create a blog post promoting the Campaign and highlighting the progress of the Campaign. • We promote the Campaign to the subscribers to our I AM PRO SNOW email communications list. • We release, to any staff member of your organization, the short form application for any upcoming Climate Reality Leadership Corps training with former U.S. Vice President and Climate Reality Chairman Al Gore. • In the event of any news release regarding the Partnership, all Partners involved in the Campaign, including you, would be included in the announcement. There are multiple additional opportunities for deeper partnership promotion, and we look forward to discussing the unique ways your organization can be involved. To facilitate each of our work to achieve the goals of the Partnership, you and we agree to grant a mutual, nonexclusive license to use and display those names, trademarks and logos owned and provided by each other ("Marks") solely as necessary to perform the work in the Partnership and only for non-commercial purposes. You and we further agree to comply with any trademark usage guidelines that either you or we may communicate to each other from time to time. Each use of the Marks will be accompanied by the appropriate trademark symbol (either"™" or "®") and a legend specifying that such Marks are trademarks of either you or us, as applicable, and will be in accordance with the then-current trademark usage policies as communicated from time to time. You and we agree to provide each other with copies of any materials bearing any of the Marks as requested by you or us from time to time. If use of any of the Marks, or if any material bearing such Marks, is deficient in quality, you and we agree to promptly remedy such deficiencies upon receipt of written notice of such deficiencies. Nothing herein will grant to you or us any right, title or interest in each other's Marks. All goodwill resulting from the use of the Marks will inure solely to the owner and licensee of the Marks. You and we agree to not, at any time during or after this Agreement, register, attempt to register, claim any interest in, contest the use of, or otherwise adversely affect the validity of any of the Marks (including, without limitation, any act or assistance to any act, which may infringe or lead to the infringement of any such Marks). The Term of this Agreement shall be from the date first written above (the "Effective Date") through May 31, 2018 (the "Expiration Date"). At the Expiration Date and on each anniversary of the Expiration Date thereafter, the Term will automatically renew for successive one-year Terms unless otherwise indicated in writing by either party. Either you or we may terminate this Agreement at any time without penalties or liabilities. You and we are independent contractors and will have no power or authority to assume or create any obligation or responsibility on behalf of each other. This Agreement will not be construed to create or imply any joint venture or other mutual agency relationship between the parties. This Agreement may not be assigned without the prior written consent of you and us. No provision of this Agreement may be modified, amended, supplemented or waived, except in a writing signed by you and us. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, including by facsimile, pdf technology, or electronic signature each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the unlikely event of any dispute arising out of or in connection with the Agreement, the Parties agree to submit the matter to settlement proceedings under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Mediation Rules. If the dispute has not been settled pursuant to the said Mediation Rules within forty-five ( 45) days following the filing of a Request for ADR Mediation or within such other period as the Parties may agree in writing, such dispute shall be finally settled under the Rules of Arbitration of the ICC by a single arbitrator appointed in accordance with the said Rules of Arbitration. The venue of such arbitration shall be London, England, and the language of the arbitration shall be English. We're looking forward to working with you to rally ski resorts, towns, businesses, and other institutions to commit to be powered by 100% renewable electricity. If the above is acceptable to you and consistent with your 2 Page 113 of 295 understanding, please indicate your acceptance by returning a signed copy of this letter to us via PDF or electronic signature. Sincerely, Kenneth Berlin, President & CEO The Climate Reality Project Acknowledged and accepted this-------day of _______ ___, by: City of Moab, Utah David Sakrison Mayor 3 Page 114 of 295 ..... . -.) Exhibit A [See attached Renewable Electricity Roadmap] 4 Page 115 of 295 1AM PRO SN W Exhibit B 100% RENEWABLE. 100% DOABLE s cCITY COUNCIL MEETING February 28, 2017 PL-17-32 Agenda Item #7-3 Title: Consideration to Adopt Ordinance #2017-07 Approving an Application to Rezone Properties Zoned R-2, Single- and Two- family Residential Zone, to R-3 Multi-family Residential Zone and to Amend the Official Zoning Map as Referred to Council by the Planning Commission Staff Presenter(s): Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Department: Planning and Zoning Applicant: G. Gilbert, Lisa M., and J. Michelle Blackburn Background/Summary: The City has received an application from the Blackburn Family, the owners of record, to rezone three parcels located at 61 and 71 South 400 East. They are owned by the family, and are located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Catalpa Lane (East Center Street) and 400 East. The property extends from Catalpa Lane south to Rosetree Lane. The properties are currently zoned R-2 and the request is to rezone the lots to R-3. The R-3 zone is adjacent to the property on the west side of 400 East Street. The southernmost lot is presently developed with a single family home and there are two manufactured homes located on the largest lot. These two manufactured dwellings are a vestige of a mining boom trailer park that existed from sometime in the early 1950’s until the late 1970’s. Initially, 400 East was the previous alignment of Highway 191. The property has been zoned and rezoned first by the county, and then the city as development trends changed and the highway was realigned to the Main Street location. The purpose of the R-2, Single-family and Two-family Residential Zone, is “…to provide a residential environment within the city which is characterized by smaller lots and somewhat denser residential environment than is characteristic of the R-1 residential zone.” (MMC 17.45.010) The intent of the R-3, Multi-family Residential Zone, is “…to provide appropriate locations within the city for high density residential development. A comparison of the R-2 and R-3 are included in the technical review. As per MMC Section, 17.04.010, Initiation of zoning change, “Any person having a proprietary interest in any real property may submit an application for a zoning map amendment or a zoning text amendment, or the planning commission can, on its own motion or on request from the city council, propose, study, and recommend changes to the official zoning map or the text of the Land Use Code.” The review requirements for applications to rezone properties are in Moab Municipal Code (MMC) section 17.04.020, Zoning text amendments (attached). Page 116 of 295 A review of the criteria for an application to rezone is also located in the Technical Review. The Planning Commission reviewed the application in a duly advertised public hearing held on January 26, 2017. The Commission considered the comments from those in attendance. There were very few comments addressing the appropriateness of the requested zone change but many comments about a concept development plan that was generated and distributed by the applicant. Subsequent to the hearing the Commission voted 3-2 to favorably recommend the rezone application to City Council. Commissioners Brown and Hoskisson voting against. Commissioner Hoskisson stated that he would like more time to think about and review the application. The approved Planning Commission minutes for the January 26 meeting are attached for your convenience and review. Options: The Council can: 1. Adopt Ordinance #2017-07 and approve the rezoning of 61 and 71 South 400 East from R-2 zoning to R-3 and amend the Official Zoning Map; 2. Vote to not adopt Ordinance #2017-07 and state their reasons; 3. Table the vote until a later date to request additional information Staff Recommendation: Staff agrees with the Planning Commission and recommends that City Council adopt Ordinance #2017-07 that approves the rezoning of the Blackburn property from R-2, Single-family and Two-family Residential Zone, to R-3, Multi-family Residential Zone, and amend the Official Zoning Map. Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance #2017-07 approving the rezoning of the Blackburn property from R-2 to R-3 and direct staff to amend the Official Zoning Map. Attachment(s): Technical Review Draft Ordinance #2017-07 Aerials Approved 1/26/2017 PC minutes Received Comment Letters Page 117 of 295 Page 118 of 295 C C s 89°55'E -1-'.Jj) '°'!l :..35) r s s9 01 ~I 20 ~ii DAVID JC 54.5' :,~ -.t'.,.. ~ '12 4641 GILBERT aLACKBURN , BO.O' MICHELE~BLACKBURN Bo.o' jz 01-( L-----==-----16-=--'o~.o-,------===---;, _ I I J. MICHELE BLACKBURN . LISA MARLENE BLACKBURN GUY GILBERT BLACKBURN 01-006-0017 !~ j~ SEE PLA Dill WEST~ LOT! 01-DUN-OI _____ 1!~:?~. 96.0' ··--~L ~I ------------···---- ier-----·--··-----------·-------·---··· -- E 1/4CORNER $C 1, T26S, R2IE, SLB&M '117382.20 59752.45 ORDINANCE #2017-07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING FOR THREE PARCELS LOCATED AT 61 AND 71 SOUTH 400 EAST IN THE R-2, SINGLE- AND TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, TO R-3 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEREAS, the Blackburn Family (G. Gilbert, Lisa M., J. Michelle Blackburn), at P.O. Box 152, Moab, Utah 84532, as the “Owner” of Record, has applied to rezone property owned by Mr. Lyle and located at 46 and 76 Nob Hill, Moab, Utah, and more particularly described as follows: Three parcels, for a total of 1.81 acres, are involved in the zoning map amendment and are more accurately described below: Parcel: 01-0006-0017 BEG AT A POINT WHICH BEARS N 16.5 FT FROM W1/4 CORNER SECTION 6 T26S R22E SLB&M AND PROCEED NORTH 368.5 FT; S 89°55’E 54.5 FT; E 160 FT; S 134.4 FT; W 96 FT; S 185.6 FT TO POINT OF BEGGINNING (TOTAL 1.22 AC.) Parcel: 01-0006-0018 BEG AT A CORNER WHICH BEARS NORTH 16.5 FT AND E 118.5 FT FROM W ¼ CORNER SECTION 6 T25S R22S SLB&M AND PROCEED N 185.6 FT; E 96 FT; S 185.6 FT; WITH N R/W ROSETREE LANE W 96 FT TO POINT OF BEGINNING (TOTAL .41 AC) Parcel: 01-0006-0020 BEG 416.5 FT N & 54.5 FEET E OF THE SW CORNER LOT 5 SECTION 6 T26S R22E SLM & RUNNING THUS S 80 FT; E 80FT; N 80 FT; W 80 FT TO POB LESS BEBINNING AT A POINT ON THE C/L OF CATALPA LANE WHICH BEARS S 89° 47’E A DISTANCE OF 46 FT FROM THE STREET C/L MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 400 E AND CATALPA LN (N 403 FT AND 5.8 FT W OF THE W1/4 CORNER SECTION 6 T26S R22E SLM) PROCEEDING THENCE N 0°12’E15 FT; S 89° 39’E 489 FT; S 0°13’W 31 FT; M 89°55’W 32 FT; S 33°35’W19.6 FT; N 63°55’W 30 FT; N 89°55’W412 FT; N 0°13’E 18 FT TO POINT OF BEGINNING (TOTAL .18 AC MORE OR LESS) WHEREAS, Applicant wishes to amend the zoning of the 1.81-acres from the R-2, Single- and two-family Residential Zone, to R-3, Multi-family Residential Zone; and WHEREAS, Applicant is requesting a change in zoning for the property to develop multi-family residential uses as allowed in the proposed zone in Moab Municipal Code 17.48.020; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission (“Commission”) held a duly advertised public hearing on January 26, 2017, to receive comment and determine the appropriateness of the proposed Map Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed the Use Regulations of the R-2 and R-3 zones and discussed the suitability of the application of the R-3 Zone to the subject property to allow multi-family development in accordance with Code Section 17.04.060, Map amendment approval criteria, and in a 3-2 vote favorably recommends the application to Council for approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) reviewed the application in a public meeting on February 28, 2017, to review the Planning Commission and staff recommendations and determine the appropriateness of the proposed Map Amendment; and Page 119 of 295 WHEREAS, the City Council found that the review standards in Moab Municipal Code chapter 17.04.060, Map amendment approval criteria, have been met as follows: A. The proposed zoning classification for residential use is compatible with the majority of surrounding uses and impacts to the existing development can be mitigated, B. Adequate facilities are available to serve the type and scope of the development suggested by the proposed zoning classification, C. The surrounding residential uses will be buffered from other residential development on the subject property and D. The application conforms to the provisions of the Moab General Plan. WHEREAS, the requested zone change is supported by the General Plan to: A. Meet the housing element of the General Plan in terms of quality, and quantity and the goal of meeting “the needs of current residents”, B. “Encourage a mixed variety of housing types” that includes employee housing provided by the business or agency, C. Meets the vision of “Separate and buffer conflicting land uses, especially where commercial abuts residential”, D. “Encourage in-fill development…” WHEREAS, the Commission in a 3-2 vote favorably recommends the zone change to the Moab City Council (“Council”); WHEREAS, Council, in a public meeting held on February 28, 2017 agreed with the Commission, and in a _-_ vote found that the request complies with the criteria in Chapter 17.04 and determined that the change in zoning was in agreement with the Moab Municipal Code and the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDINAINED by the City of Moab, that effective upon the signing of this Ordinance, the rezoning request for 46 and 76 Nob Hill as submitted by Four Corners Community Behavioral Health, is hereby approved and Council directs staff to amend the Official Zoning Map for the City of Moab. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of the City of Moab in open session this _____ day of _________ __, 2017. City of Moab Mayor David L. Sakrison Attest: Rachel Stenta City Recorder Page 120 of 295 Page 121 of 295p-l/) ~ z w ~ w s f ..I ~ ~ II --:-----------1 --------------, --·'-I 1---1 I Existi g II I Aband ed LOT 2 I Reside, e I I I LOT3 I I I I Existing gravel drive I l Existng gravel drive i= ~r I --------------1 I I " __ J LOT1 Existing Mobile Home 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ! ! ! Existing I' I II ~ Accessory I :S Residence , w w cc ........ II ti Cl) Existing I I II i Primary ,-~ i =I_J[ __ j --~---~---~-1-~---~-------t------~· ~ 400EAST Existini Site & Lot Plan ~.~N January 4, 2017 Page 122 of 295 Blackburn Parcels 0 50 100 200 --Feet 1 inch = 1 oo feet N + Page 123 of 295 Blackburn Parcels 0 15 30 60 w w Feet 1 inch = 40 feet N + PL-17-15 TECHNICAL REVIEW MEMORANDUM  Request to Rezone Property Located at 61 and 71 South 400 East Street    For Presentation: January 26, 2017 Meeting of the Moab Planning Commission  Date Prepared:  January 19, 2017  Prepared By:  Jeff Reinhart, Planning Dir.  Subdivision:  N/A    Name and Address of the Owner(s) of Record:     Blackburn Family (G. Gilbert, Lisa M., J. Michelle Blackburn)  P.O. Box 152     Moab, Utah 84532       Name and Address of Representatives:       N/A    Summary of Significant Issues    1. It must be determined if the land to be rezoned, was zoned in error and, as presently zoned, is  inconsistent with the policies and goals of the city’s general plan.    2. The applicant must show that the area for which a map amendment is requested has changed or is  changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage a redevelopment of the area.    3. It must be considered whether or not the proposed map amendment is necessary to provide land for  a use which was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the Moab General Plan, and if the  change is consistent with the policies and goals of the plan.     4. The City must determine if the application to rezone is compatible with the surrounding zoning and if  adequate measures are proposed to mitigate any readily identifiable impacts.    5. The City must determine if the proposed uses agree with the surrounding uses and aspects of the  General Plan.    Base Information  Size and Location:    The property is approximately 1.81 acres or 79,043 square feet in size and located on the east side of  400 East Street between Catalpa Lane (East Center Street) on the north and three hundred and sixty    City of Moab Planning Department  Interoffice Correspondence Page 124 of 295 nine (369) feet south, to Rosetree Lane. The property extends east from 400 East Street about two‐ hundred and fifteen (215) feet toward the east.      Surrounding land uses include single‐family residential uses to the north, east, northeast, south and  southwest. Directly across 400 East is Cedar Breaks Condos.      Legal Description for the parcels:    Three parcels, for a total of 1.81 acres, are involved in the zoning map amendment as described below:  Parcel: 01-0006-0017 BEG AT A POINT WHICH BEARS N 16.5 FT FROM W1/4 CORNER SECTION 6 T26S R22E SLB&M AND PROCEED NORTH 368.5 FT; S 89°55’E 54.5 FT; E 160 FT; S 134.4 FT; W 96 FT; S 185.6 FT TO POINT OF BEGGINNING (TOTAL 1.22 AC.) Parcel: 01-0006-0018 BEG AT A CORNER WHICH BEARS NORTH 16.5 FT AND E 118.5 FT FROM W ¼ CORNER SECTION 6 T25S R22S SLB&M AND PROCEED N 185.6 FT; E 96 FT; S 185.6 FT; WITH N R/W ROSETREE LANE W 96 FT TO POINT OF BEGINNING (TOTAL .41 AC) Parcel: 01-0006-0020 BEG 416.5 FT N & 54.5 FEET E OF THE SW CORNER LOT 5 SECTION 6 T26S R22E SLM & RUNNING THUS S 80 FT; E 80FT; N 80 FT; W 80 FT TO POB LESS BEBINNING AT A POINT ON THE C/L OF CATALPA LANE WHICH BEARS S 89° 47’E A DISTANCE OF 46 FT FROM THE STREET C/L MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 400 E AND CATALPA LN (N 403 FT AND 5.8 FT W OF THE W1/4 CORNER SECTION 6 T26S R22E SLM) PROCEEDING THENCE N 0°12’E15 FT; S 89° 39’E 489 FT; S 0°13’W 31 FT; M 89°55’W 32 FT; S 33°35’W19.6 FT; N 63°55’W 30 FT; N 89°55’W412 FT; N 0°13’E 18 FT TO POINT OF BEGINNING (TOTAL .18 AC MORE OR LESS)   Present Uses and Zoning/Proposed Uses:    The property is developed with three single family homes: one site‐built and two factory manufactured  homes. There is an older small garage or shed structure toward the northern edge of the property  fronting Catalpa Lane      The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to R‐3, Multi‐family Residential Zone, and develop the  land with additional new housing. A full list of use types for the R‐2 and R‐3 zones is located below.    Review of Submittal Requirements    The applicant has submitted the required documents as established in 17.04.040, Application for zoning  map amendment or text amendment, and listed below:  1. The name, address, and telephone number of the applicant;  2. A description of the requested change or amendment and a description of the property to be  affected by such request by a metes and bounds legal description;  3. A title certificate or report from a licensed title company or attorney listing the name of the  property owner(s) and all liens, easements, judgments, and encumbrances of record that affect  the title to the subject property;  4. A statement from the county treasurer showing payment in full of all real property taxes due on  such parcel;  Page 125 of 295 5. A boundary survey of the land area to be rezoned, which shall include a depiction of existing  zoning district boundaries, real property boundaries, existing structures, and public roads  existing within three hundred feet in all directions of the subject property boundary;  6. A list of surrounding property owners and their legal mailing addresses for all properties within  three hundred feet of the exterior boundary of the parcel proposed for a zoning map  amendment;  7. A statement by the applicant explaining the rationale for the zoning request relative to the  standards imposed by this chapter;  8. A filing fee in accordance with the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the city council; and  9. A narrative describing why this property is suited for the intended purposes and stating what  development and/or construction is planned by the applicant.    Compliance with Review Criteria    The Planning Commission and City Council is required to consider the criteria in Moab Municipal Code  (MMC) section 17.04.050 Map amendment policy declaration, when reviewing a zoning map amendment.  The declaration follows:   “Zoning map amendments shall only be approved if the applicant establishes that one or more of the  following standards apply to the subject real property:    A. The land to be zoned was zoned in error and, as presently zoned, is inconsistent with the  policies and goals of the city’s General Plan.  B. The area for which a map amendment is requested has changed or is changing to such a degree  that it is in the public interest to encourage a redevelopment of the area.  C. The proposed map amendment is necessary in order to provide land for a use which was not  anticipated at the time of the adoption of the city’s General Plan, and that such change will be  consistent with the policies and goals of the Plan.  Special consideration shall be given to existing  conditions on and around the area in question, including the changing nature of the area, land  uses, densities, and the height and scale of both existing and proposed structures.  (Ord. 08‐03  (part), 2008)    MMC 17.04.060, Map amendment approval criteria, contains the elements that the commission and  council shall consider in reviewing a proposed map amendment:    A. Was the existing zone for the property adopted in error?    The applicant is not claiming that there was any error in zoning.    B. Has there been a change of character in the area including, but not limited to:  the installation  of public facilities or new utilities; other approved zone changes; new growth trends;  deterioration of existing development; or the need for development transitions?  Continued current growth trends have increased pressure on the lack of housing in the  community. Rezoning the parcel will allow a potential for more housing development on an  underdeveloped parcel.      C. Is there a need for the proposed zoning within the area or community?   Page 126 of 295 As noted above, there has been an increased demand for housing and there are many parcels  zoned for the use. However, these parcels remain underdeveloped with single homes  perpetuating the lack of housing. There is a need for willing property owners to do more in an  effort to address the housing issue.      D. Is the proposed zoning classification compatible with the surrounding area or uses; will there  be adverse impacts; and/or can any adverse impacts be mitigated?  The proposed change in zoning is compatible with the existing surrounding uses and will provide  a much needed transition to the residential uses. Any impacts will be identified and evaluated  during the site plan review process.     E. Will benefits be derived by the community or area by granting the proposed zoning?  The benefits to the community are described in the submitted narrative and in section C, above.     F. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope of development  suggested by the proposed zoning classification? If utilities are not available, can they be  reasonably extended?  All utilities are available for the proposed uses on this property.    G. Does the application conform to the provisions of the Moab General Plan, the Land Use Code…?   The application has met the submittal requirements of MMC Title 17, Zoning. The applicant has  also presented a narrative that addresses the requirement of applying the General Plan to the  application and supports the zone amendment with specific sections of the Plan.        Zone Comparison   R‐2/R‐3 Comparison of Uses  R‐2 MMC 17.45.020 R‐3  MMC 17.40.020  One-family dwellings One-family dwellings  Two-family dwellings Two-family dwellings Apartment houses and other multiple dwellings  Court apartments    Boarding and rooming houses Accessory buildings and structures Accessory buildings and structures Secondary dwelling units as per Chapter 17.69.  Secondary dwelling units as per Chapter 17.69. Planned unit developments 17.66 Planned unit developments 17.66  Customary household pets Customary household pets  Public schools Public schools  Public libraries Public libraries  Public parks/playgrounds Public parks/playgrounds  Recreation buildings Recreation buildings  Churches Churches  Agriculture Agriculture  Temporary construction buildings/yards Temporary construction buildings/yards  Home occupations Home occupations  Child day care centers Child day care centers  Foster family care homes  Foster family care homes   Other public facilities Clubs and lodges (nonprofit)  Page 127 of 295 Page 128 of 295MOAB PUEBLO ZONE CHANGE REQUEST (R-2 to R-3) PREFACE: This is the first owner-requested Zone variance in over 100 years of family-held land ownership. There were no government-applied Zones over the first 50 years, however, since 1954, City and County officials have applied and changed the Zone designation, depending on the prevailing vision of the community. Historians will recall this land once fronted the State Highway (Main Street). Later, when our existing bridge systems were constructed, the highway was realigned, to where it is today. In its early history, the acreage was primarily agricultural (including a residence), with a fruit orchard of apple and apricot trees. Later, during the mining boom, it became "Robertson's Trailer Court," to provide workers affordable housing. Then, in the late 1980s, the City "outlawed" trailers, and the Zone was changed from Trailer Court to R-2. In 2013, the County Assessor attempted to change the Zone back to Trailer Court, in order to justify higher property taxes. That action was successfully appealed, with the help of the City Zoning department, and the Zone was restored to R-2. Today, our family and the community are requesting this property be Zoned R-3, so we can, once again, provide affordable housing for working-class residents. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project -herein referred to as "Moab Pueblo" -is a multi-partner collaboration between the Blackburn Family and Community Rebuilds with the aim to create a small scale, affordable multi-family apartment complex. In order to accommodate density exceeding maximum two-family dwellings (duplexes), a zone change from R-2 to R-3 is required. There are no anticipated impacts requiring mitigation. The proposed re-zoning is compatible with surrounding uses. All residential parcels West of the subject parcels are zoned R-3. The Blackburn Family (Lisa, Gilbert and Michele) collectively owns the property (3 parcels), which has been held by the family for over 100 years. The family, having experience managing rental property in Moab, plans to manage this development once built. The family does not wish to sell the property to a developer or subdivide the property into lots for sale. Community Rebuilds is a non-profit organization with a mission to build energy-efficient housing, provide education on sustainability, and improve the housing conditions of the workforce through an affordable program. To date, Community Rebuilds has built 17 single-family homes for low-income families in Moab and educated over 135 students in Moab on green construction building practices. Community Rebuilds is participating in a Capacity Building Collaborative with the Rural Community Assistance Corporation (RCAC) as part of this project to expand its knowledge of multifamily development, which will increase the number of families that Community Rebuilds can serve in the Moab community. Page 129 of 295RELATIONSHIP TO THE MOAB GENERAL PLAN: This project supports the elements of the General Plan through: 1) Economic Development: The project will increase the Moab City tax base through employing local contractors, builders and other Utah professionals while utilizing locally-sourced natural materials to create an aesthetically-pleasing, multi-family apartment development. The development will provide housing for a diverse demographic of moderate-income residents serving our community. Completion of these apartments will provide an improved standard of living for its residents, and improve the neighborhood at large. Aesthetic improvements to the property will enhance local appeal. 2) Growth & Urbanization: The project will be an example of efficiency in land and resource use in Moab's rapidly developing downtown corridor. Emphasis on appropriate architecture and landscaping will create an integrated whole meant to complement existing homes and the native landscape. 3) Land Use: The project is an opportunity to invigorate inner-city acreage which has remained largely vacant and unproductive since the City's land use changes regarding Trailer Parks in the late 1980s. Design for the landscape will emphasize ecological health through resource management, including water conservation and appropriate planting. One goal will be to use all on-site water resources -following the best practices of water harvesting -in order to alleviate strain on Moab City stormwater infrastructure. First-rights water shares (Moab Irrigation Co) will be utilized for passive irrigation. 4) Urban Design: Efficient use of limited resources in an urban environment will be emphasized. Energy conservation will be achieved through the use of progressive building design (i.e. -straw bale) and active and passive solar techniques. Design will consider the needs and quality of nearby homes. 5) Housing: Moab Pueblo supports the need for greater quantity, quality and affordability within the City limits. The project will help address the current need for a diverse array of housing options, providing a multi-tiered approach to apartment affordability, and housing diversity, with studio, one and two bedroom units. 6) Parks and Recreation: While not a Public Park, the project will beautify property within and abutting the public right-of-way. As well, within the development, a common area will be designed for residents' outdoor use, including but not limited to: a children's play area, a small orchard and small plots for growing vegetables. 7) Transportation: By creating an array of affordable rental units in proximity to the downtown corridor, Moab Pueblo will encourage its residents Page 130 of 295to practice lower-impact forms of transportation, including walking and bicycling. 8) Public Works: Ecological design -integrating buildings and the localized landscape -will ensure efficient energy use while preventing waste. 9) City Services: The project will be constructed in compliance with current safe building codes, including but not limited to: fire-resistant building materials and sprinkler systems for fire mitigation, and solar-lighted parking and pathways for resident safety. Should a serious situation arise, residents will be located within minutes of peace officers, fire fighters, and emergency medical services. RELATIONSHIP TO EXPANDED GENERAL PLAN COMPONENTS: This project supports the vision of a thriving, healthy community that preserves the integrity of Moab's historical character while carefully integrating it with responsible and innovative design practices in order to: • revitalize downtown residential acreage to provide easy access to central commercial zones, essential employment, and social activities; • create higher density residential use, while maintaining green space and minimizing urban sprawl; • preserve the historic home (built in 1911) and mother-in-law structure; • reduce effects of summer heat by utilizing existing water sources (including water rights and rainfall), applying ecological design in the landscape (maximizing tree and shrub plantings for shade, cooling, and privacy), and incorporating permeated paving. • improve quality of living by providing a high-quality, in-town, energy-efficient, and affordable place to live. RELATIONSHIP TO THE MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE (17.04.050) Map Amendment Policy Declaration: A. As presently zoned, these parcels are inconsistent with the policies and goals of the City's General Plan, as it relates to creating affordable housing. B. The area is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage a redevelopment of the area, and to do so in such a way that provides a positive and innovative example of HOW. The execution of the Moab Pueblo development will include public and private educational opportunities on integrated building and landscape design that will serve as a template for future development. C. The proposed map amendment is necessary in order to provide land for more densely developed residential use, consistent with the policies and goals of the General Plan. Special consideration should be given due to the dilapidated existing conditions, the changing nature of the area, the need for Page 131 of 295more affordable housing, the preservation of existing structures, and the reduced scale (for R-3) of the proposed structures. RELATIONSHIP TO THE MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE (17.04-060) Map Amendment Approval: A. Existing Zone adopted in error? Hard to say. The property has been used as a trailer park for decades, long before the City re-zoned it as R-2 roughly 30 years ago. The continued use as a non-conforming trailer park demonstrates that the need and demand for affordable housing at this site remains. B. Change of character in the area? Yes. Current growth trends call for increased availability of affordable, long-term rentals. The property has been deteriorating since the Zone was changed to R-2. C. Need for proposed Zoning? Yes. R-2 will not allow multi-family buildings. D. Compatible with surrounding area? Yes. Vast acreage to the West is zoned R-3. Adverse Impacts? Not that we are aware of. Should any adverse impacts be identified in the future, they will be mitigated. E. Benefits? Yes! The existing and future residents of this neighborhood, as well as the municipality, will benefit from improved aesthetics, site-specific resource management (including stormwater), and the provision of affordable housing for our workforce. F. Are adequate facilities available for the proposed zoning? Yes. Utilities and City services have been provided to this property for many decades. This project, once completed, will improve upon existing systems. G. Conforms with the Moab General Plan, Land Use Code. and applicable agreements? Yes. This project is an excellent "fit" with City plans and community needs. RELATIONSHIP TO RESOLUTION #15-2009, ADOPTION OF THE HOUSING STUDY AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN (10-13-09): This project supports the 5-year goals and objectives to make affordable housing available to all residents, by: • achieving and protecting secure, affordable, decent housing opportunities for residents; • contributing to overall rental opportunities, allowing the community to recruit and retain the skilled workforce needed by community employers; • creating housing stock affordable to all income levels, including very low, low, moderate, and up to 120% of Area Median Income (AMI) households; Page 132 of 295• collaborating with public and private entities to incorporate the most progressive, natural building techniques, in support of low-cost construction, water conservation, energy-efficiency, and education, resulting in greater numbers of quality, affordable housing solutions; • involving multiple community and outside agencies, including contracting with non-profit builder, Community Rebuilds, and consulting with the Rural Community Assistance Corporation (RCAC), to keep the focus on affordability. The Blackburn Family and Community Rebuilds welcome this opportunity to collaborate for the benefit of the community, and believe this project has the potential to become a model of what can be accomplished when landowners, conscious developers, and the City of Moab work together to support the development of affordable housing. Please direct any questions or concerns to: The Blackburn Family Michele Blackburn, Managing Partner Phone: 435-259-0816 Email: jmicheleblackburn@qmail.com We look forward to hearing from you. Page 133 of 295• collaborating with public and private entities to incorporate the most progressive, natural building techniques, in support of low-cost construction, water conservation, energy-efficiency, and education, resulting in greater numbers of quality, affordable housing solutions; • involving multiple community and outside agencies, including contracting with non-profit builder, Community Rebuilds, and consulting with the Rural Community Assistance Corporation (RCAC), to keep the focus on affordability. The Blackburn Family and Community Rebuilds welcome this opportunity to collaborate for the benefit of the community, and believe this project has the potential to become a model of what can be accomplished when landowners, conscious developers, and the City of Moab work together to support the development of affordable housing. Please direct any questions or concerns to: The Blackburn Family Michele Blackburn, Managing Partner Phone: 435-259-0816 Email: jmicheleblackburn@gmail.com We look forward to hearing from you. Moab City Planning Commission, Minutes Page 1 of 9 Meeting, January 26, 2017 MOAB CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING :: MINUTES :: JANUARY 26, 2017 :: Members Present: Laura Uhle, Jeanette Kopell, Allison Brown, Wayne Hoskisson, Joe Downard Members Absent: None City Councilmembers: Rani Derasary City Staff: Planning Director Jeff Reinhart, Community Services Director Amy Weiser, Zoning Administrator/Planning Assistant Sommar Johnson, Public Works Director Patrick Dean, City Engineer Phillip Bowman Public Members: ~ 37 The Moab City Planning Commission held its regular meeting on the above date in the Council Chambers of Moab City Offices, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. Planning Commission Chair Jeanette Kopell called the meeting to order at 6:02 pm. Planning Commission Workshop – 5:30 pm  General Plan Update Planning Commission members held a discussion about the General Plan Update. The initial discussion centered on the formatting of Chapter 4. In general, the Commissioners felt the formatting of the chapter was cohesive with other chapters of the General Plan Update. Commission members also discussed the various goals and policies spelled out in chapter four. They concluded their discussion by outlining a plan for presenting the General Plan Update document to the public and City Council. 1. Election of Chair and Vice Char Commissioner Downard moved to keep the Chair and Vice Chair the same as 2016. It was requested that Commissioner Downard state who it was for the people that don’t know. Commissioner Downard specified Jeanette Kopell as Chair and Wayne Hoskisson as Vice Chair. It was corrected that Vice Chair was Allison Brown. Commissioner Downard corrected his motion to keep Jeanette Kopell as Chair and Allison Brown as Vice Chair. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Commissioner Kopell stated that according to what she has heard in the wings she can only be Chair for two terms unless the Commission wants to keep it the way it is right now. She said in usual cases it is two terms. Community Services Director Weiser clarified that the term limit is in the Planning Commission bylaws but if that was the motion and that is what the Commission wants then move forward with it. Commissioner Downard stated for the sake of discussion he wanted to keep his motion. There was no further discussion. The motion passed 5-0 aye. 2. Citizens to be Heard There were no citizens to be heard 3. Action Item Approval of Minutes: January 12, 2017 Page 134 of 295 Moab City Planning Commission, Minutes Page 2 of 9 Meeting, January 26, 2017 Commissioner Hoskisson moved to approve the minutes of January 12, 2017 as written. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. There was no discussion. The motion carried 5-0 aye. 4. Action Item – Planning Resolution 05-2017 A Resolution Conditionally Approving the Final Plat for Phase Two of the Valley View Subdivision on Property Located at Approximately 930 Millcreek Drive in the R-2 Zoning District Planning Director Reinhart gave an overview of the final plant for phase 2 of the Valley View Subdivision. Commissioner Uhle moved to adopt Planning Resolution 05-2017, favorably recommending approval of the final plat for Phase II of the Valley View Subdivision with the condition: A Development Improvements Agreement shall be approved by City Council prior to recording the final plat. Commissioner Downard seconded the motion. There was no discussion. The motion carried 5-0 aye. 5. Public Hearing – Zone Change Application 17-0103 Moab Pueblo Map Amendment – Zone Change Application Proposed zoning map amendment for property located at 61 and 71 South 400 East, requested by the Blackburn Family (G. Gilbert, Lisa M., and J. Michele), from R-2 Single-Family and Two- Family Residential Zone to R-3 Multi-Family Residential Zone and amending the City of Moab Official Zoning Map. Planning Director Reinhart gave an overview presentation of the zone change application including a comparison of the permitted uses in each zone. He emphasized the map amendment policy declaration and reminded the Commission that these are the things they should be evaluating in establishing their resolution to the Council. Planning Commission Chair Kopell opened the public hearing at 6:22 pm. She was reminded that the applicant should have a chance to speak prior to opening the public hearing. Planning Commission Chair Kopell closed the public hearing at 6:22 pm to allow the applicant an opportunity to address the Commission regarding her application. Applicant Michele Blackburn introduced herself to the Commission and stated she is the managing partner for her family which includes her sister Lisa, her brother Gilbert and herself. She explained that this project represents a lifetime vision of being able to improve the property. She said they have owned the property for over 100 years and they have coupled with a mindful contractor to keep the project affordable. She said they have been providing affordable housing for people in this community for 75 years and currently do not have any tenants that are paying a market rate for their business or their home. She said this is a natural evolution that they would be able to step up at this time and it is obvious that the community needs housing and needs housing that they can afford at all income levels. She explained that the development would be a small-scale apartment complex utilizing solar and permaculture. She said it is important to the family to be good neighbors and have opened up their design process to input and comments which she feels is the best way to go. She explained that it was a little more contentious but it is how information comes to the table so that everyone can make a better decision. She said she is very open to answering questions. Commissioner Hoskisson explained to Ms. Blackburn that she would have another opportunity to address comments or concerns at the conclusion of the public hearing. Ms. Blackburn concluded by stating that the Commission was familiar with what the zones would allow and they would like to create something that is aesthetic and still flows with the neighborhood as it is today. She stated the R-2 zone would allow them to put a number of duplex units on the property but which is not the best use of that Page 135 of 295 Moab City Planning Commission, Minutes Page 3 of 9 Meeting, January 26, 2017 space. She said they prefer to have the same amount of units clustered toward the middle with less driveways. She thinks that is a better use of the property and are hoping for the rezone to R-3. Planning Commission Chair Kopell opened the public hearing at 6:27 pm. Drake Taylor stated he was a resident at 498 Rosetree Lane and said he would try not to harp too much on the proposed site plan but it was something he was given so he feels it is worth commenting on. He stated he is a father of two children and there are other children on their street. He stated their main concern as a family is the increased vehicular traffic if it were to be diverted, ingresses or egressed on to Rosetree Lane. He said it seems like there is a very busy street, 400 East, which could accommodate the traffic rather than the proposed site plan. He said for them they would really like to see that not occur on their street for safety reasons. He stated Rosetree Lane is narrow, it has no sidewalks, their kids play on it, and they skateboard on it and bike on it and walk on it. He said you see kids on their street, you see adults on their street and he would ask that of the Commission. Pete Apicella said he is a tenant and lives next to Lisa. He said he lives on the property that is going to be built around so this is going to affect him the most of anybody here. He said he knows there are neighbors here that live up Rosetree and Center but he is going to be surrounded by the development. He said he knew about this when he moved in and he has lived there for more than 10 years. He said he is very happy there. He said his life is complicated too but he wanted to thank Lisa and Michele for being very kind and benevolent landlords. He said he lives in the little onesie shack and it is old. He said he works in town as an artist and waits tables but he paints murals and contributes to the community that way. He stated one of the main ways he can do it is because he is not totally squeezed for income so he is able to live in Moab the life that everybody wants to live. He feels like he uses that to give back and that comes from them being generous to him as a tenant. He said he used to live on Powerhouse Lane in the trailer park before they all got relocated and he is in a vulnerable position because he doesn’t own property. He said he waits tables for 90% of his income and 10% of his income is as an artist and he feels fortunate and lucky and some people are jealous for that but he thinks it’s a good thing to do and contribute that way. He said he was speaking as a way to support Michele and Lisa in their vision. He said they have been very conscious and caring and he has never had any tiffs with them. He said he is a very loyal tenant. He said he hasn’t seen the total layout but he feels that there is a good design. He said it is a cool design and a cool layout and whatever the actual configuration is if that is cool he is fine with more density there. He thinks that will help keep rents low as well over the long term. Barb Zinn stated she lives at 460 Rosetree, diagonally across from the Blackburn property. She said she would like to talk about the ingress and egress on their two lanes, Center Street and Rosetree, rather than on 400 East. She said these lanes are sized for R-2 neighborhoods and the addition of 30 more cars coming in and out is unsafe and incompatible with the R-2 neighborhood area. She said as it was shown in the presentation all the lots east of 400 East are R-2 except the commercial ones on the south and Rockridge on the hill. She said she takes upzoning in her area very seriously as it can open the door for future upzone requests in their R-2 area. She said not everyone is going to be as sensitive in development as Michele. She stated the Blackburn plan for affordable housing is to be applauded and if developed as presented could be a model project that benefits the community. She said however if the upzone is approved there is no guarantee that the units will be affordable. She said with Community Rebuilds as partner or builder as laid out in the proposal, deed restrictions on income levels would be in place but currently their first MOU is about to run out and the second one has not been signed. She said she is personally feeling a little bit in limbo. She feels that the MOU that those deed restrictions and numbers about what levels of income will really be served is necessary for her to support the upzone. She does not think we need another apartment complex that our workforce can’t afford in this town. She said she did not know if it was possible but she would suggest postponing this decision so that the MOU can be worked out and perhaps some mitigation of the ingress and egress at the same time. She said if postponement is not an option then she is opposed to the rezone. Sarah Schrepel said she lives at 559 Bowen Circle here in Moab. She said she has never done this and she wasn’t sure if she was going to talk but she kind of relates to all of these people. She said she has two small children and Page 136 of 295 Moab City Planning Commission, Minutes Page 4 of 9 Meeting, January 26, 2017 she is a single mom so she understands the need for them to play and not too many cars. She said at the same time the affordable housing here is pretty much non-existent. She said anything short of living in a trailer in a park or something like that or right now her situation is living with another male and she said she rents two rooms from him so she thinks she is pulled more toward this. She understands that the zoning it once could cause other people to want to do it but the need for affordable housing and, as she said, it may not even be affordable but it would be really nice if it was affordable. She stated she works full-time at a preschool and makes $9 an hour but she works full-time but with this market she is still on state assistance. She said she wants to live here and she wants to raise her kids here and wants her kids to be part of this community. She said she would not support a lot of things to be zoned in that area but she knows Michele and the family for 10 years so it is important to her that she has the vision for it being sustainable and cost affordable hopefully but she can only see that overall it would be beneficial to the town. She said it is not a huge monstrosity, it will be easy on the eyes and a lot of people, herself included if she got in there, would definitely ride her bike or walk. She said it is right in the middle of the town and it is not like all 30 of the people will be driving in and out consistently. She said you’re right in the middle of town and people will walk or ride their bikes. She said the daycare she works at is right by the city park so she understands everyone’s thing but she is totally going to be in favor of it because in the long run with it not being not an eyesore and being sustainable and hopefully being at for people with lower incomes. She said there is not a lot of options for them and she does not want to raise her kids with roommates. She understands there is Cinema Court and Huntridge but she does not like those kinds of places. She said Huntridge seems like the projects to her and Cinema Court is still kind of weird for her because it seems more city and she likes the idea of what Michele has planned. Carol Mayer stated she lives at 444 Rosetree which is due south of the project. She is impacted so one of these when it says there is no impacts to be mitigated there are that haven’t been mitigated yet between the developer and the neighbors. She said the zone is in the middle of a neighborhood on a quiet street and they’ve got ingress and egress which was mentioned before but those are two of the main reasons why most of the neighbors are here. She said they have issues that they need to have worked out. She said they are being worked out and Michele has met with the neighbors. She said they are very appreciative of this even though they came late to the table. She said if things had been worked out ahead of time the neighbors would be behind this zone change because all of their issues would have been answered. She said as of right now they have not been answered and this is not an actual affordable housing complex. She said they all want affordable housing but it is not yet nailed down and that is one of the most important things. She said not every unit in this complex is going to be affordable housing and she thinks that is something that she thinks they need to think about. She asked the Commission to either postpone their decision tonight or she would like them to vote no. Planning Commission Chair Kopell wanted to remind everybody in the audience that this is not a site plan public hearing. She said this is a zone change public hearing so everyone that comes up and talks about the actual development, they are not voting on the development. She said they are only voting on the zone change. She said she has not seen the site plan and does not think the commission has seen the site plan. She said as Commission members they try to be as objective as the can be and not subjective. She said they look at the code as it is written and they do not look at site plans. She said they look at the code as it is written. She said there has been some changes in the last 72 hours and that there is a moratorium on site plans right now. She said remember that they are here for a zone change and not for the site plan. Joe Kingsley said in addressing some of the comments that he started working on this and trying to work with the Blackburn family and trying to get a density and from day one it was to work on affordable housing. He said he worked with them for almost a year and his plan was to do a tiny home project and get the city code changed to be able to have tiny home lots. He said because of the delay and the passion that the Blackburn’s have on getting affordable housing they partnered up with someone else to keep the ball moving forward. He said something that is compelling in his view of their passion is that they were paying property tax on a 50 unit trailer park and they maintained paying those taxes because they wanted to maintain that density. He said when they started working on it, it became apparent that they could not preserve that because the trailer park was gone. He said his research Page 137 of 295 Moab City Planning Commission, Minutes Page 5 of 9 Meeting, January 26, 2017 on this property back then the people who would be renting this he can assure you most wont’ even own a car. He said they will use it and bike to town because being closer to town and being affordable housing, he strongly feels the need for an automobile will be way down in the list it will not be high. He said the high thing is being able to have a home and being able to commute to town in affordable way which will be bike and walking. He strongly urged the Commission to vote positive with this zone change. He said it is something that Moab needs and it is across the street. Trish Hawkins said she lives on Center Street and she finds herself in a very unfortunate situation with this zone change. She said they have seen Michele’s plan, they applaud her plan, and thinks it is really fantastic but there is no guarantee moving forward that this plan will in fact happen if you add a zone R-3 upgrade. It is her understanding that there is no place for public input once the zone change has been approved. She said with no place for public input once the zone change is approved it is possible should something happen and this plan doesn’t go through that this piece of property could be fully built out to the extent of the R-3 zoning which she thinks is completely inappropriate for her neighborhood. She feels that we have a flawed process if there is no room for public input after the zone change is complete. She stated with a PUD there is room for public input after that has already been decided. She said given that that’s the situation she would have to oppose this zone change and she hopes that the Council will look to changing this situation so that projects like this can go forward in the future without being put in this difficult situation. Mike Duncan said he and his wife live at 579 Rosetree just up the street on Rosetree from Michele’s development. He said he just concluded an 8 year stint on the county planning commission and they have often seen the same kind of dilemma come up when people request rezones and the developer has the best of intentions. He said no one doubts the Blackburn family’s intention but the scary part of it for them in view of the most important criteria is it something that the community needs and we all agree we need affordable housing. He said other than the fact that the apartments likely will go on and it’s denser and that will help but what they have seen in the county is that it doesn’t necessarily guarantee they will be affordable for people up to 80% of median incomes. He said while the neighbors have been meeting and talking about this, his general feeling is that they generally approve it, they would be a lot more comfortable if there was some way to guarantee or bind in some fashion a commitment to go with a PUD ideally in an R2 zone if they can get the density that she needs to make it pencil out or R-3 if necessary. He stated of course Cinema Court as you guys know has been a well-received subdivision. He stated he hears that Michele doesn’t want that but said he was talking site so he would skip that. He said R-3 is something that may well grow but the neighbors would be more comfortable with it if they knew that this one was going to result in something that is genuinely affordable and that is not so easy to do. He said that is the only unsettling part of it and other than that they are a go. Theresa Wilson stated she lives on Center Street. She said she thinks the system is flawed that you have to approve a zone change that could open doors to things that you don’t want. She said all the area east of 400 East is R-2. She stated the plans said vast areas west of 400 East are R-3 and that is true, and equally vast areas are R-2 east of it with the exception of Rockridge. She said there are only currently nine residents living surrounding the property that would be upzoned to R-3 and her request is to maintain the R-2 zoning that has been in place since the late 80’s. She said they like what the Blackburn’s vision they have for it but they want to trust the city government to follow their own plans and ordinances and rules and laws. She knows that a planned affordable development (PAD) concept was discussed a couple years ago and that it was stalled but resurrect the discussions and creatively consider this development and, in your wisdom, find a way to support affordable housing with the Blackburn family within the R-2 zone and support the quality of life that neighboring R-2 residents want. She said the only difference they appear to want is to share walls to make utilities and things more affordable that R-2 doesn’t allow but if it were affordable could it. She said approving a request for rezoning when an idea comes along that does not fit the current zoning requirements doesn’t instill trust and confidence in the city’s commitment to its long-term residents. She said affordable housing is a popular buzz phrase and it is tempting to jump on the bandwagon in order to alleviate a real housing issue. She said you have an opportunity to do something innovative for the future of Moab residents. She said everything doesn’t have to turn a higher zoning to Page 138 of 295 Moab City Planning Commission, Minutes Page 6 of 9 Meeting, January 26, 2017 allow affordable and to allow something creative like the Blackburn’s are proposing. She said it should allow it in R-2 because the density number of people isn’t more and the zone change provide absolutely no guarantee to alleviate affordable housing needs and no assurances to them as long-term residents concerning traffic and noise and light pollution and potential for conflict without any guarantees or restrictions. She said a zone change opens the door to allow anything within R-3and applies to all future developments. She feels there is a commitment to them because they live there, they bought in R-2 and it was adjacent to them and she thinks their plan could fit in the R-2 if we are creative and innovative. Jeremy Lynch and he is an ecological designer and landscape designer in town. He said he has talked to Michele and others about this project as well as to the neighbors and he is very impressed by the citizen engagement of this project already as it stands. He said a lot of what he hears is fear and, to some degree, very justifiable fear but he thinks it is going to be innovation and taking that step that really gets one of these projects done whether this is affordable housing or whatever it is determined to be that is the goal and those steps come a little bit later. He said right now what we need first is this change and so he is in support of it. He said he is a neighbor. He lives a few blocks away and has been here for four years and wants to be here for a lot longer than that and this is the kind of step we need to take if we are going to get there. Bill Foreman did not wish to speak but provided a written comment stating one zone change can lead to another and until we know what is going to happen he would like to wait, otherwise he is in favor. He also referred to the email he sent previously. David Wilson did not wish to speak but stated they did not mention or acknowledge the letters they received regarding the zone change and questioned why not. Applicant Michele Blackburn welcomed questions from the Commission. She said it is easier to do that than speak off the cuff. Commissioner Uhle asked Ms. Blackburn if she were to subdivide how many duplex units could she fit on the land. Ms. Blackburn deferred to Soren Simonson, the architect for their plan, and he gave her an off the cuff response. Commissioner Uhle stated at 1.81 acres they were so far below what she could do. Soren Simonson stated that 1.81 acres is about 79,000 square feet for the lots and the R-2 zone for duplexes is 3,000 square feet for each unit and the rough calculation is about 26 units. Michele stated they hope that is not what they are forced to do because that is 26 units and 26 driveways and talk about a traffic nightmare and that is what it is zoned for. Commissioner Downard asked Ms. Blackburn if she had any rebuttal to any comments they heard. Ms. Blackburn stated rebuttal makes it sound like she is arguing with her neighbors and she doesn’t want to do that. She said she wanted to thank everyone who commented and she said she really believes this opportunity to bring comments and information to the table is what makes it a better process. She said she welcomes the constructive comments and it has made her think and has caused her family to really reflect on what their goal is and what it is that they really want to accomplish here. Ms. Blackburn thanked everyone for their time and the Commission for the hours they put in. Commissioner Uhle stated in what she is putting forward this takes a lot of altruism and a lot of self to do this from a private standpoint and you don’t see it often and thanks Ms. Blackburn. Ms. Blackburn thanked the Commission, the neighbors, and the people who spoke in support. She said she didn’t solicit those comments except from Pete because she thought maybe their longest tenant would be a good person to hear from. She said she is available for contacting for future questions from the Commission or the neighborhood and welcomed them to contact her. Commissioner Hoskisson stated he looked at this to see what was possible and even keeping a 5,000 square foot lot for the home on the corner it is large enough it would still permit 24 units in duplex housing so even in an R-2 Page 139 of 295 Moab City Planning Commission, Minutes Page 7 of 9 Meeting, January 26, 2017 we can get some pretty heavy density into that lot. He said it is hard and what we need to do is look at the criteria for a zoning change and that is what their discussion should center on. Commissioner Kopell stated she looked at what is allowed and not allowed and it is pretty similar. She thinks what we have to remember is that the zone change is not supposed to be presented with the development and there are other places that put the zone change with the site plan or development. She said it is very difficult to do this objectively because she has never seen the site plan and she has to be super objective about this. She sated she is only looking at what is in the code not what is on the site plan. She said we have a site plan moratorium right now for six months so nothing can move forward for six months as far as the site plan. Members of the audience questioned the public notices with the site plan attached and asked if the Commission received those. Commissioner Downard clarified that the only thing they were considering was the zone change Planning Commission Chair Kopell closed the public hearing at 7:01 pm. 6. Action Item – Planning Resolution 06-2017 A Resolution Recommending Approval of a Zoning Map Amendment for property located at 61 and 71 South 400 East, requested by the Blackburn Family (G. Gilbert, Lisa J., and J. Michele), from R-2 Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Zone to R-3 Muti-Family Residential Zone and amending the City of Moab Official Zoning Map. Commissioner Downard moved to send Planning Resolution 06-2017 to City Council with a positive recommendation. Commissioner Uhle seconded the motion. Commissioner Brown mentioned that someone brought up the idea of a PUD during the public hearing and from what she understands a PUD can’t happen on a lot less than three acres so they cannot look at the PUD as an option for this, even a PUD in the R-2 zone because it has to have at least three acres. Commissioner Uhle believed that was a good comment for problem solving but it cannot be used for this application. Commissioner Downard noted that a comment about the process being flawed and wondered if we should change our codes. He said we have no option but to rezone and keep our fingers crossed that they actually go through with it. Community Services Director Weiser stated that in some places you can tie a zone change to a development plan but our code does not require that right now but it may be something to consider with code revisions in the future and there are different options we can look at but it won’t help the zone change today. Commissioner Brown asked about the moratorium that was passed on Monday by City Council and whether changing the process for site plans and asked if those types of code changes would fall under the moratorium. She asked if they can link the site plan to the zone changes in order to bring those two together. Community Services Director Weiser stated those cannot be linked. Commissioner Uhle said when looking at the uses in each zone you can assume the highest and best use would be applied so you can assume multi-family housing as the use. Commissioner Uhle also stated we have an opportunity in an area of growth where we are going to be dealing with zone changes over the next 10 to 20 years and how we plan and envision the City and how the General Plan and the Affordable Housing Plan leads us to this point. She said we have a private opportunity for multi-family housing and we have gone full circle with this over the last 15 years. She said it would be an awful shame not to allow this. Commissioner Downard noted one of the concerns during the public hearing was about the size of the roads for Center Street and Rosetree. He questioned if these were the same size as R-3 or if they were old roads that aren’t to our new standards of 50 feet. Planning Director Reinhart stated the Rosetree right-of-way was significantly wider but East Center Street appears that the lot line comes right up to the street corner curb and gutter. He said as far as the street width it is probably about 30 to 35 feet. Commissioner Downard stated it would be the same for R-3 or R-2. City Engineer Bowman said the standard for a residential street width is 36 feet that allows two regular drive lanes and two seven foot park lanes to allow parallel parking and attached sidewalks on both sides but clarified that it would be addressed during the site plan process. Commissioner Uhle asked if we would require a traffic study for the site plan and City Engineer Bowman stated the parameters that define the traffic study need are in general terms and are fairly loose so it is based on the Page 140 of 295 Moab City Planning Commission, Minutes Page 8 of 9 Meeting, January 26, 2017 development density and the site specific situations. Commissioner Brown stated 17.04.060 has the map amendment approval criteria and those things are what we need to make a decision on or table this until we can make a decision. Commissioner Hoskisson stated those are the things that are pertinent to the motion but the other piece of the code is the difference between the R-2 and R-3 in terms of traffic. He said it is anticipated that R-3 would have a heavier traffic pattern than R-2 and those are the pieces that are of concern. He thinks it would be worthwhile go through the criteria and discuss each of those. Commissioners generally agreed that the zoning was not adopted in error although it was pointed out that the property was originally zoned R-4 and then changed to R-2 so it is not unreasonable to change it to multi-family again. Commissioners discussed whether there has been a change of character in the area. There was difficulty in determining how to define the area but they generally agreed that there has been a change of character and new growth trends are upon us and that is part of the criteria. They discussed that zoning is not supposed to be a rigid concept and the zone is not a forever promise on the part of the city. It was noted that we lost a lot of affordable housing on the west side of town and that is not something that we have managed to replace. They ultimately believed that it was reasonable to think that the area has changed especially when talking about new growth trends. Commissioners all agreed there was a need for affordable housing and agreed there is a need for multi-family housing. Commissioners agreed that increases in density will have impacts but those impacts can ultimately be mitigated through the site plan process. Commissioners agreed that benefits will be derived by the community and the area because there is a need for multi-family housing and the rezone would allow it but the existing zoning would also allow it on a smaller scale. They generally felt that if the property is developed as R-2 or R-3 it would benefit the community but the R-3 would allow more housing per acre Commissioners agreed that adequate facilities are available to serve the property. Commissioners also agreed that the application conforms to the provisions of the General Plan. Commissioner Hoskisson made a second motion to table the application. A discussion ensued about parliamentary procedures and the ability to make a second motion while the first motion was not acted upon. Commissioners questioned whether they can discuss an idea of a table without making any other motions. Commissioners questioned the idea behind tabling the decision and Commissioner Hoskisson stated he would like more time to think about it. He also stated he would like to discuss a second motion to reopen the public hearing and receive written comments until the proposal is brought back before the Commission. Commissioner Brown said she thinks that some of the issues can be addressed if and when a site plan comes before them. She said some of the adverse impacts and some of the issues the public hearing brought up cannot be heard or discussed or mitigated until it has gone forward to help ease the problems and fears that the neighborhood has. Planning Director Reinhart recommended that the Commission look at Planning Resolution 06-2017 and be certain that what is drafted in the resolution is how they feel because these are the findings that they are sending on to the City Council. Page 141 of 295 Moab City Planning Commission, Minutes Page 9 of 9 Meeting, January 26, 2017 Commission Chair Kopell called for a vote. The motion carried 3-2 aye, with Commissioners Brown and Hoskisson voting nay. Commission Chair Kopell recessed the meeting at 7:22 pm. Commission Chair Kopell reconvened the meeting at 7:27 pm. 7. Public Hearing – Planning Resolution 04-2017 A Resolution Recommending the Adoption of the Moab Area Affordable Housing Plan as an Addendum to the City of Moab General Plan Planning Director Reinhart gave an overview presentation of the Moab Area Affordable Housing Plan. Commission Chair Kopell opened the public hearing at 7:29 pm. No public comments were made. Commission Chair Kopell closed the public hearing at 7:30 pm. 8. Action Item – Planning Resolution 04-2017 Recommendation to City Council A Resolution Recommending the Adoption of the Moab Area Affordable Housing Plan as an Addendum to the City of Moab General Plan Commissioner Brown moved to adopt Planning Resolution 04-2017 recommending that City Council adopt the housing plan as an addendum to the General Plan. Commissioner Uhle seconded the motion. There was no discussion. The motion carried 5-0 aye. 9. Future Agenda Items Commissioners held a brief discussion regarding future agenda items. Adjournment Planning Commission Chair Kopell adjourned the meeting at 7:45 pm. Page 142 of 295 Page 143 of 295A B C D E 1 Zone Acres % of Total 2 A-2 9.91 I 0.33% ! t I ~ 3 C-1 6.60 I 0.22% I 4 C-2 73.96 2.43% l 5 C-3 160.46 5.26% 6 C-4 523.70 17.18% 7 C-5 18.51 0.61% 8 FC-1 119.61 3.92% 9 1-1 26.14 0.86% 10 MH/RV-1 34.33 1.13% 11 R-1 7.08 0.23% 12 R-2 676.78 22.20% l 13 R-3 199.40 6.54% 14 R-4 362.36 11.89% 15 RA-1 532.31 17.46% 16 RC 157.61 5.17% 17 SAR 139.89 4.59% 18 ... 19 Total City Acreage 3048.66 20 Grand County Islands Not Included in Total Page 144 of 295M Gmail Zone change for Moab Pueblo Bill Foreman <wc4man@gmail.com> To: jeff@moabcity.org Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:47 PM Like most folks, I'm in favor of a low income housing project, but, from my point of view as a close neighbor to the development, I have two concerns: 1 -One zone change can easily lead to another, I've heard, and I'm not in favor of more R3 developments in the neighborhood, and: 2 -Even though the project has been in the works for a while, we've only been informed recently about it. It would be nice if we had more time to be sure what is being planned is actually going to happen. That's my input. Bill Foreman 460 Rosetree Lane (across the street from the proposed development) Moab, UT 84532 435-259-4077 RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2017 BY: Page 145 of 295Barbara Zinn 460 Rosetree Lane Moab, Utah 84532 City of Moab Planning Commission 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Dear Planning Commissioners: Following are my comments concerning agenda item number 5: Public Hearing -Zone Change Application 17-0103 Moab Pueblo Map Amendment -Zone Change Application Proposed zoning map amendment for property located at 61 and 71 South 400 East, requested by the Blackburn Family (G. Gilbert, Lisa M., and J. Michelle), from R-2 Single-Family and Two Family Residential Zone to R-3 Multi-Family Residential Zone and amending the City of Moab Official Zoning Map. From the proposed site map, my greatest concern is the ingress/egress on the lanes rather than on 400E, along with the parking at the back of the lot. These lanes were not designed for the volume of traffic that 30 vehicles will introduce, but rather for that of the existing R2 neighborhood. Using them for R3 volume traffic is unsafe. As I live on Rosetree, I can give specifics for that lane: -It is a through street, and is used by many (including myself} as a shortcut to the Tusher neighborhood, Mill Creek Road, Sand Flats, etc. There is no doubt that renters in this development would do the same. -There are a nightly rental business and a Band Bon the street, and most tourists staying there are unaware of Rosetree's traffic hazards. Adults and children walk, bike, and play on the street, and ATVs are common. -Rosetree is narrow with no sidewalks, and many cars park on the street, narrowing it further. There would be overflow parking along our street from this development as well. -The proposed egress has large trees and bushes up the street that block the view, and vehicles sometimes come down the hill at high speeds. The Moab General Plan, section IV.4, specifies reduction of traffic congestion and conflicts, but egress on Rosetree will increase them. -400E is a wider street with a median lane for maneuvering as well as better sight distance. It is designed for heavier use. In short, it is a safer alternative. Finally, I can't be confident that the development will provide the community benefits claimed (true affordable housing) until deed restrictions are agreed upon. I cannot support up zoning until these issues are resolved, and I ask you to postpone a decision until more is in place. I applaud the Blackburn's efforts and desires, but need more time to be sure this will truly benefit the community. Sincerely, t.~cr RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2017 BY: Page 146 of 295City of Moab Planning Commission 217 East Center Street Moab, UT 84532 RE: Public input on proposed change from R-2 Single-Family and Two-Family Residential Zone to R-3 Multi-Family Residential Zone. Property located at 61 and 71 South 400 East Planning Commission Members: Let the record show that we support an affordable, energy-efficient, and aesthetically pleasing concept for the Blackburn property. AND, let the record show that we are opposed to the rezone of the property located at 61. and 71. South 400 East. Long-term residents live quiet lives adjacent to the proposed rezone property. Maintain the R-2 zoning that has been in place since the late 1980's. We want to trust the city government to follow their own plans, ordinances, rules, and laws. We know that a planned affordable development (PAD) concept was discussed in the last couple of years and that discussions stalled. Resurrect the discussions. Creatively consider this development and in your wisdom, find a way to support affordable housing with the Blackburn family within the R-2 Zone and support the quality of life that neighboring R-2 residents value. Approving requests for rezoning when an idea comes along that does not fit into existing zoning requirements does not instill trust and confidence in Moab City's commitment to its long-term residents. Affordable housing is a popular buzz phrase and it is tempting for Planning and Zoning to jump on the bandwagon in order to alleviate a very real housing issue in Moab. You have an opportunity here to do something innovative for the future of Moab residents. • R-2 should allow for affordable housing, quality Community Rebuilds construction, energy efficiency, and aesthetically pleasing, safe, and livable neighborhoods. The Blackburns should be supported to work within existing R-2 Zone parameters to achieve this goal. • A zone change alone provides no guarantees to alleviate affordable housing needs and no assurances to the long-term residents concerning traffic, noise, light pollution and potential for conflict. Without any guarantees or restrictions, a zone change opens the door to allow anything within R-3, and applies to all future development. • R-3 zoning would set an irreversible precedent opening the door to R-3 east of 400 East. R-3 potentially doubles the population density which increases noise, traffic, light pollution and problems to occur between residents. Essentially all of the properties east of 400 East are Zoned R-2. Rockridge is the main R-3 exception. The proposal refers to "Vast acreage to the west. .. zoned R-3." There is equally vast R-2 zoning on the east side of 400 East surrounding this plan and beyond. • A 30-vehicle parking lot directly adjacent to the existing R-2 neighbors with car headlights, car alarms, exhaust, engine noises, slamming car doors, and people talking loudly outdoors to others is tremendously unsettling to imagine and should not be permitted. Please consider future ramifications, not just for the people who would benefit from the creation of affordable housing, but for those of us who have invested in our homes, properties, and the neighborhood around this site up until this time. David & Theresa Wilson I 464 East Center Street I Moab, UT 84532 RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2017 BY: Page 147 of 295Trish Hawkins 453 East Center St Moab UT 84532 Dear Planning Commission, Jan 25th 2017 I am writing in regard to the proposed application for a zone change, from R-2 to R-3, for the Blackburn property on 400 East. The Blackburn family has approached the neighbors with their proposal for developing this property. This is the type of development that I believe should be happening in the City to elevate our housing problem. However, this proposal requires a spot zone change to our R-2 residential neighborhood and there is NO guarantee that the Blackburn's will be able to move forward with their development plan as they are initially proposing. Once an up zone to R-3 has been granted the property could be built out to full capacity without any public review. This is unacceptable for our neighborhood. Without any assurance that the Blackburn's proposed development will actually happen, with no MOU in place between the Blackburn's and Community Rebuilds I cannot support this zone change. I ask the Planning Commission to not approve this zone change. Thank you for your service to the community, Sincerely, ---rJ A 11 11 ~-----Trish Hawkins 'i.-/ v V \:: RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2017 BY: Page 148 of 295Joan Gough 441 East Catalpa Lane AKA Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 City of Moab Planning Commission 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Dear Planning Commissioners: This is in regards to the Blackburn Development request for a spot zone change from R-2 to R-3. As you know, this for the block fronting on 400 East between Catalpa Lane (Center Street) and Rosetree Lane. The City General Plan has the entire area from 400 East to the hills above Hillside zoned R-2 with the exception of the commercial strip to the south and the senior apartments to the north. The narrow lanes-Locust, 200 South, Nichols, Rosetree and Catalpa-make it necessary that this neighborhood stay R-2. The use of the City General Plan to minimize conflicts in the community is an important one. The Plan states [R-2] "should provide for low-density residential uses ... " Sec. Ill, no. 3. Even concerning low-income housing the Plan states that it should be "consistent in scale and character with surrounding neighborhoods." Sec. IV, No. 9. Traffic is a major safety issue with the lanes being so narrow. There are no sidewalks on the lanes and no room for them. This puts us all, especially kids, at increased risk with increased traffic. Can you even have parking on both sides of the lanes and have two vehicles pass? Other issues for the neighborhood are noise and light spill over. Four Hundred East is already very noisy. The number of car alarms going off, idling engines, banging doors will all increase noise by the same amount you increase population. Our neighborhood in this area is very dark which we have worked hard to maintain. Pets too, will increase the foot print of residents and the potential for conflicts. Professional, on-site management with clear guidelines will go a long toward mitigating problems of rental properties here. The lanes are unique in Moab. They created a neighborhood of working-class, low-income family homes. Let's not lose that when it is most needed and disappearing all over Moab. And, let's not set a precedent for other zone changes in the area east of 400 East. Any change to the City General Plan deserves careful consideration. Please, do not grant this zone change until neighbors and yourselves are assured as to the plans, the developer and management. We all want this to be a success. It shouldn't be rushed. Thank you for your work for this community. 11~~0~ Sincerely, _,,Jr ~ (:J/,an Gough RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2017 BY: Page 149 of 29525 Jan 2017 City of Moab Planning Department Jeff Reinhart Sommar Johnson Moab, Utah Re: Blackburn family R2 to R3 re-zone application Dear Mr. Reinhart, Ms. Johnson: My wife and I are residents near the subject property. You are probably aware of on-going discussions of a group of neighbors, including myself, with Michelle Blackburn and a potential collaborator, Emily Niehaus of Community Rebuilds. You may know then that the neighbors, with a few exceptions, are in general favorably disposed towards the re-zone and the subsequent development, particularly if Community Rebuilds is an active participant to ensure that genuinely affordable (80% of units are "affordable" to 80% of median income, with deed restrictions) housing results. That guarantee also makes the potential spread ofR3 ~of 4th East less painful. There are also several site plan alterations the neighbors suggest to mitigate the development's impact on the neighborhood-for example ingress/egress routes, location of parking, and privacy of nearby neighbors. I've served on the County Planning Board for eight years and have often seen the quandary posed by, one the one hand, dense, unaffordable development permitted by zone upgrade right, and on the other, the best intentions of the applicant to build something rather more acceptable, for what intentions are worth. I'm searching for some way to ensure those good intentions happen, prior to re-zone approval. Perhaps, if possible, a PUD submission, ideally under the existing R2 zone. Perhaps a delay to ensure Community Rebuilds participation. Failing those, perhaps a Cinema Court development that is acceptable to all. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Mike Duncan and Bonnie Crysdale 579 Rosetree Moab ~ ~fVY\---J~~~ 1F..ECEIVED . JAN 2 5 20'7 BY: Page 150 of 295Drake Taylor Helene Boyer Eli Taylor (14 years old} Mona Taylor (14 years old) 498 Rosetree Lane Moab, Utah 84532 City Planning Commission 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 To the Planning Commission: This letter is in regards to the Blackburn request for a zone change from ~-2 to R-~ for their property on 400 East. In the opinion of our family, the proposed site plan which the Blackburn fpmily has submitted to you in their packet, is not acceptable for the following reasqris. 1.) The potential increase in traffic on the 2 adjacent lanes in the R2 distri~t: Rosetree and East Center (Catalpa Street), is first of all not consistent with Moab rw,unicip~I Code # R3 17.48.010 . Objectives and characteristics: The objective in establishing the R-3 residenti~I zone is to provide appropriate locations within the city for high density residential developmrnt. In general, this zone is located in the central part of the city, adjacent to commercial areas wpere the irnpact of vehicular travel and parking is consonant with adjacent use of land, and y.,here multiple dwellings can best be supplied with necessary public facilities. This zone is char;cterized by more compact development and somewhat higher volumes of traffic than is char~cteristic qf the R-1 and R-2 zones. · Their proposed site plan shows the parking lot on the east side of their land (next to an R4 neighborhood), the ingress on the north side (Catalpa) and the egress on the s3J.1th side (Rosetree Lane). These three sides of the property affected by the request for a zone chqnge from R2 to R3 would experience negative impacts to what is currently a quiet neighborhoop with residential R2 characteristics. r 2.) And secondly, and most importantly in our opinion, the proposed site plan do,i; not cre~t~ a safe neighborhood. Rosetree and Catalpa Lanes are narrow streets without sidewalks, and as a family whose kids and friends walk, bike, and skateboard our street daily, increas~d traffic js a great concern to us and the safety of our kids. 3.) We are also concerned knowing that the proposed site plan is just th~t: "a proposed site plan". In other words, after obtaining the zone change (if permitted), the devel9pers are in no way committed to their initial proposed site plan, and neither th~ public, 11or the city, nor the planning department has any authority to hold them to t~eir initial site plan. This is very concerning to us. We applaud the Blackburns' desire to create affordable housing, but it is pur opinjqn that our concerns need to be resolved before our family will support their project. /),ake Taylor ~e Boyer Mona Taylor Eli Taylor RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2017 BY: Page 151 of 295January 25, 2017 City Planning Commission 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Re: Proposed Up Zoning of 61 and 71 S 400 East R2 to R3 Moab Pueblo Commissioners, RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2017 BY: My property lies immediately south of above described property on Rosetree. The neighbors surrounding this parcel (on Rosetree, Catalpa/Center and on the eastern property line) have been exchanging electronic communications, meeting with each other, with Emily Niehaus of Community Rebuilds (the proposed builder) and with Michele Blackburn of The Blackburn Family (Developers) after we were notified of the project via the letter from the Planning Commission and a packet of the legal information provided by The Blackburn family concerning this zone change. Per the packet: "PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project -herein referred to as 'Moab Pueblo' is a multi-partner collaboration between the Blackburn Family and Community Rebuilds with the aim to create a small scale, affordable multifamily apartment complex. In order to accommodate density exceeding maximum two-family dwellings (duplexes), a zone change from R2 to R3 is required. There are no anticipated impacts requiring mitigation. The proposed re-zoning is compatible with surrounding uses. All parcels West of the subject parcels are zoned R3." Even though the neighborhood was brought into the conversation late in the game, Ms. Blackburn has been very amenable to our concerns and is going above and beyond what other developers would do for the neighbors directly impacted by their projects. However, as the results of the neighbors' meetings I am convinced: a) There are impacts requiring mitigation that will not be agreed upon with the neighbors, Community Rebuilds and the Blackburns until AFTER the meeting with P & Z on Thursday, Jan. 26th: 1) Sole ingress from Center and sole egress onto Rosetree. 2) A one way parking lot at the back (eastern) side of the project; parking lot noise will directly impact residences on the eastern boundary; all headlights from parking lot will shine into the two properties on Page 152 of 295Rosetree; all vehicles must exit on a small lane with limited visibility to the east due to established vegetation, no sidewalks and typical small neighborhood uses (bikes, children walking, biking and skateboarding, dog walking,); residential and possible overflow street parking on both Rosetree and Catalpa/Center will create a bottleneck. 3) Building placement contiguous to Center/Catalpa. b) The proposed re-zoning is NOT compatible with the surrounding uses which, on three sides of the project (same side of 400 East) are single family residential. c) The project has no official affordable housing distinction at this time. In our conversations with Emily Niehaus of Community Rebuilds (which all neighbors agree is the premier affordable housing provider in Moab) we were apprised of the fact that the current preliminary MOU between the Blackburn Family and Community Rebuilds will cease as of Sunday, January 29th and a more detailed, second MOU, specifying the project's AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPONENT has not been, and will not be, signed in time for the commissioners to approve the up-zone. Because of the above, I ask the commissioners to postpone or deny the proposed zone change at this time. ~tfully, Cfilol Ma~~~ 444 Rosetree Lane Page 153 of 295Dear Planning Commission, January 25, 2017 Walt and Carey Dabney submit the following comments regarding agenda item #5: 5. Public Hearing-Zone Change Application 17-0103 Moab Pueblo Map Amendment-Zone Change Application Proposed zoning map amendment for property located at 61 and 71 South 400 East, requested by the Blackburn Family (G. Gilbert, Usa M., and J. Michelle), from R-2 Single-Family and Two Family Residential Zone to R-3 Multi-Family Residential Zone and amending the City of Moab Official Zoning Map We understand that: In considering a request for an amendment to the zoning ordinance or map,, the planning commission may submit a recommendation for or against the request or it may recommend an alternate amendment. Walt and Carey Dabney at 523 Rosetree Lane request the Planning Commission take note of the following neighborhood concerns with the vehicular traffic and parking impacts that should be mitigated by revising the current draft project design included in the packet of Information City of Moab Planning Commission Proposed Zone Change Application which was shared with residents on both Rosetree Lane and Center Street several days ago. The current draft design shows both parking and vehicular traffic accessing the east side of the property by entering on the north side (Center Street) and departing on the south side (Rosetree Lane). These three sides of the property affected by the request for a zone change from R2 to R3 would experience negative impacts to what is currently a quiet neighborhood with residential R2 characteristics. In reviewing the packet of information we received, (Relationship to the Moab Municipal Code 17.04.060 part D.) the developer stated that "Should any adverse impacts be identified in the future, they will be mitigated." A change from R2 to R3 also includes the following language: R3 17.48.010 Objectives and characteristics: The objective in establishing the R-3 residential zone is to provide appropriate locations within the city for high density residential development. In general, this zone is located in the central part of the city, adjacent to commercial areas where the impact of vehicular travel and parking is consonant with adjacent use of land, and where multiple dwellings can best be supplied with necessary public facilities. This zone is characterized by more compact development and somewhat higher volumes of traffic than is characteristic of the R-1 and R-2 zones. The address of the property in question is 61 and 71 South 400 East 400 East is directly adjacent to the existing R3 zone and siting both the ingress and egress, as well as the parking on the west side of the development would support both the current R2 zone and proposed R3 Zone. We have shared this information with both the Blackburn family and with the neighbors impacted by this proposed zone change request and believe that mitigating the impact of vehicular traffic and parking by moving those impacts to 400 East is both a reasonable request and one supported by City code. Thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments. Walt and Carey Dabne RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2017 BY: Page 154 of 295 This agreement between Moab Regional Hospita l (MRH) and Moab City s hall be from October 1, 2016 until September 30th, 2017, unless terminated earlier by mutual consent. MEMORANDUM of UNDERSTANDING Purpose: Communities That Care (CTC) is a coalition-based community preve ntion operating system that u ses a public hea lth approach to prevent youth probl e m behaviors including underage drinking, tob acco use , v iole nce, delinquency, school dropout and substance abuse, and i ssues related to mental health such as d e pression and anxiety. CTC activities are planned and carried o ut by the CTC Community Board , a prevention coaliti o n of community s takeholders who work under the direction of city and community leaders to promote positive yo uth outcomes. CTC is intended to h e lp decision-makers in the community select a nd implement effective prevention policies and programs to address the most pressing iss ues facing their youth. CTC guides th e community coalition through an assess ment and prioriti zation process th a t identifies the risk and protecti ve factors most in need of attention, and links those priorities to prevention program s that are scientifically prove n to work in ad dressing them. In order to implement the CTC program and in pursuit of the above goals, the parties hereby agree: Moab Regional Hospital agrees and shall be responsible to : A. Serve a s the fiscal agent for the Grand Co unt y Communities T h a t Care Coalitio n and serve as the program lead agen cy B. Provide s upervis ion for CTC coalition coordinator C. Provide compensation and benefits for CTC coordinator D. Provide office space, m a terials a nd resources for CTC coordinator E. Establish the Grand County CTC Coalition program Moab City agrees and shall be responsible to: A. Make an annual payment of $10,000 as a financial s takeholder in the Grand County Communities That Care Coalition fo ~ears, 2:Q:16,;,Z CII ~ ~-;J.d){R-~'f B. Designate a representative to sit o n the Grand Co unty Communities That Care Coalition Key Leader Board. Las t Revised : 11 /20 16 Page 155 of 295 MOA B REG IO NAL HO S PIT A L The proceeding responsibilities apply to said designee: Key Leader Responsibilities a) Participate in a Key Leader Orientation training. b) Attend four quarterly Key Leader Board meetings. If the designated representative is unable to attend they will send a replacement and/or re view coalition meeting minutes and written provide feedback to Coalition Coordinator. c) Provide oversight for the Coalition's Community Board d) Support and contribute to the strategic planning process e) Fill out quarterly in-kind donation forms to track volunteered service KEY LEADER CONTACT INFORMATION 1. Name: ----------------- 2. Phone Number ( ) ___________ _ 3. Email Address -------------- CONFIDENTIALITY Both parties agree that the y shall be bound b y and shall abide by all applicable Federal or State regulations pertaining to the confidentiality of client record s or information , health care records (should any be used by the Coalition) and employment record s (including volunteers). AMENDMENT The original agreement may be amended onl y by written amendments executed b y both parties . Moab Regional Hospital / Fiscal Agent Key Lead er Name by: Name/Titl e Moab Regional Hospital / Fi scal Agent Key Leader Member Signa ture Title (Print) Title (Print) Last Re vised: 11 /201 6 #: 7‐5 Title: Moab Golf Course Revised Lease Agreement Fiscal Impact: None Staff Presenter(s): David Everitt Department: Administration Applicant: N/A Background/Summary: The City of Moab owns the land upon which sits the public golf course in Spanish Valley. In 2005, the City entered into a lease agreement with the Moab Country Club for the purpose of operating and managing the golf course. That agreement expired in 2015. The proposed agreement is substantially the same as the expired agreement, except that it establishes a savings account for needed capital improvements at the golf course that is funded with 1.5 percent of the annual gross operating revenues. Options: Approve, deny, or modify the recommended lease agreement. Staff Recommendation: Approve. Recommended Motion: Move to authorize the Mayor to sign the lease agreement as proposed between Moab City and the Moab Country Club for the operations and maintenance of the Moab City Golf Course. Attachment(s): 1. Expired lease agreement 2. Revised lease agreement Agenda Summary Sheet Council Meeting Date: February 28, 2017 Page 156 of 295 ~ MOAB Resolution #18-2017 Page 1 of 1 February 28, 2017 RESOLUTION #18-2017 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GOLF COURSE LEASE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Moab City desires to approve the lease agreement, last entered into with the Moab Country Club on April 12, 2005 for the purpose of operating and maintaining a golf course. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF MOAB CITY THAT: The Lease Agreement as presented to the Moab City Council at this Meeting is hereby approved and shall be executed by and delivered to the appropriate officials. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council this 28th day of February, A.D., 2017. SIGNED: ______________________________ ATTEST: David L. Sakrison, Mayor _______________________ Rachel E. Stenta, Recorder Page 157 of 295 Lease Agreement  THIS LEASE AGREEMENT; made and entered into this______________ day of  ____________. 2016, by and between CITY OF MOAB, Utah, a principal Corporation,  herein referred to as LESSOR, and MOAB COUNTRY CLUB, a non‐profit Utah  Corporation, herein referred to as LESSEE.  WITNESSETH:  1. That Lessor , for and in consideration of the rent hereinafter specified to be paid  by lessee, and the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, leases and  lets unto Lessee premises situated in Grand County, State of Utah, to‐wit:  a. Parcel No. 1: The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SW1/4 SE1/4),  Section 15, Township 26 South, Range 22 East, SLB&M.  b. Parcel No. 2: The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NW1/4  NE1/4), Section 22, Township 26 South Range 22 East, SLB&M.  c. Parcel No. 3: The West one – half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast  Quarter (W1/2 NE ¼), Section 22, Township 26 South, Range 22 East, SLB&M.  d. SE 1/4 , Section 15, T26S, R22E, SLB & M.,  SW ¼ SW ¼ Section 14, T26S, R22E, SLB & M.,  NW ¼ NW ¼ Section 23, T26S, R22E, SLB & M.,  The North 500 feet of the E ½ NE ¼ NE1/4 Section 22, T26S, R22E, SLB&M.,  and the N ½ N 12 SW ¼ NW ¼ Section 23, T26S R22E SLB & M. Containing  137.6 acres, more or less.  The following described real property, to‐wit: S1/2 of N1/2 of SW1/4 of  NW1/4, and the S1/2 of SW1/4 of NW1/4 of NW1/4, Section 22, T26S, R22E,  SLB & M.  2. This lease shall be for a term of ten (10) years from the date of this Agreement.  3. It is understood and agreed that this lease is granted for the express purpose of  operating and maintaining a golf course; however, it is understood and agreed  that Lessee shall have the right, in connection with the operation of a golf course,  to maintain club house facilities, swimming pools, tennis courts and related  activities customarily enjoyed by a non‐profit corporation for the entertainment  and general welfare of its members and guests, including the sale of alcoholic  beverages as provided by the laws of the State of Utah.  Page 158 of 295 4. It is expressly understood and agreed that members of the general public,  whether members of the nonprofit corporation or not, shall be permitted to play  on said golf course under the same conditions and restrictions as if they are dues  paying members, however, Lessee shall have the right to regulate play on said  golf course for the purpose of preserving the greens and grounds and for  maintaining orderly and proper use thereof.  5. Lessee shall have the right to assess its users whatever green fees it shall deem  appropriate, however, Lessor shall have the right of review of the fees charged  and Lessor may reduce or increase the said fees in accordance with good public  policy.  6. It is understood and agreed that Lessee is a non‐profit corporation and Lessor  shall not, at any time, have the right or option to interfere with the internal  affairs of the said corporation.  7. Lessee agrees to maintain the property in good and attractive condition.  8. Lessee may, at Lessee’s sole cost and expense, make such changes, alterations or  improvements as may be necessary to fit said premises and all buildings, fixtures  and improvements of every kind and nature, whenever installed by Lessee, shall,  upon termination, remain the property of Lessor. Lessee may purchase such  personal property as it shall see fit, and upon termination of this lease, may  remove the same.  9. It is understood and agreed that the above – described premises are situated  within the area of the Moab City watershed and that it may become necessary in  the future for the City to make use of said area for the purpose of developing  water or for protecting the area from contamination. In such event and upon  notice from Lessor to Lessee that such use is necessary; the Lessor shall have the  right and option to terminate the Lease or any part that may be affected thereby,  without compensation to Lessee.  10.  The Lessee shall pay to Lessor a sum equal to a 1.5 percent of the annual gross  revenue from all operating revenue. Including, all revenues from green fees, daily  use fees, cart fees, range pass fees and cart storage fees. Revenues from the  snack bar and pro shop shall not be included in this payment. Said sum shall be  paid by June 1 of each year, for the previous one year period ending December  30 31. This sum shall be placed into an escrow account and used as funding to  make improvements to the golf course. The use of these funds shall be agreed  upon by the Lessee and the Lessor prior to removing funds from said account.  Page 159 of 295 11.  The phrase “annual gross revenue from all annual operating revenue” shall be  defined as revenues from all green fees, equipment rental, equipment, storage,  gross sales from the pro shop and from the gross sales of any future operations  that may be conducted by the Lessee under the provisions of Paragraph 3 above,  in any given calendar year.  12.  The Lessee shall make available to the Lessor, copies of the Lessee’s regular  financial statements.  13.  An independent financial review for the Golf Club, performed by a certified  public accountant, shall be submitted annually by the Lessee to the Lessor, on or  before June 1  13.  The Lessee shall provide a copy of the following, annually to the Lessor.  Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax (Form 990)  Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return (Form 990‐T)  14. Lessee shall present an Annual Operations Report to the Lessor on or before  January 30 of each year. Said report shall detail all operations activity of Lessee  for the previous calendar year.  15.  It is understood and agreed that the Lessor may, at its expense, make such  improvements as it shall deem necessary to repair, preserve, or enlarge said  property leased herein, or to make any other improvements deemed necessary  by Lessor. Such repair or improvements so made shall be at such time and in such  manner so as to cause the Lessee the least amount of disruption to its operation  of said golf course.  16.  It is understood and agreed that Lessor owns and has responsibility for the  maintenance of all water pumps and meters installed and used on the premises  as outlined in Paragraph 1.  17.  The Lessee shall pay to Lessor for water usage at a rate mutually agreed upon by  the two parties.  18.  Lessee hereby agrees to provide a summer youth golf program at its sole  expense.  19.  The Lessee shall assume all risks incidental to or in connection with the business  to be conducted hereunder and shall be solely responsible for all accidents or  injuries of any nature to persons or property caused by its operation at these  premises. Lessee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Lessor, its  authorized agents and representatives, from any and all claims or liability for  damages resulting in the death of any person, or loss of damaged property  Page 160 of 295 occasioned by or in connection with the use of the premises hereby leased. The  Lessee hereby assumes full responsibility for the character, acts and conduct of  all persons admitted to said premises, or to any portion of the premises. Lessor  assumes no liability or responsibility whatsoever for any property placed in said  premises and Lessor is hereby expressly released and discharged from any and all  liability for any loss, injury or damaged to persons or property that may be  sustained by reason of Lessee’s occupancy under this Lease.  20.  Lessee shall carry, at its own expense, property damage insurance in the amount  of $1,000,000.00 for any one accident.  The Lessor is to be made a co‐insured with the Lessee on this insurance and said  insurance policy is to contain a rider requiring that the Lessor be notified thirty  (30) days in advance of any changes or termination of said insurance policies.  21.  The parties hereto shall have the option to extend this lease for one additional  ten (10) year period under the same terms and conditions. This option may be  exercised by written consent of both parties hereto, prior to November 1, 2026.  In WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and seals on this 1  st day of November, 2016.  LESSOR:                                                                                        CITY OF MOAB, UTAH                                           Attest:                                                      ______________________                                                       By:  ____________________                                                   City Recorder                                                                 David L. Sakrison, Mayor    LESSEE:                                                                                         MOAB COUNTRY CLUB                                                                                                           By: ___________________                                                                                                               Ross Tabberer, President  State of Utah         )  County of Grand   s                                   )  On the __________ day of _______________ , personally appeared before me  ______________, who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same.                                                                                                           ___________________________                                                                                                         Notary Public  My Commission Expires:                                                           Residing in: Grand County  Page 161 of 295 Page 162 of 295RESOLUTION #27-2005 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GOLF COURSE LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE WHEREAS, Moab City desires to amend the lease agreement entered into with the Moab Country Club on April 12, 2005 for the purpose of operating and maintaining a golf course and; WHEREAS, the lease agreement amendment number one attached to this resolution has been presented to this meeting of the Moab City Council and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF MOAB CITY THAT: The Lease Agreement Amendment Number One as presented to the Moab City Council at this Meeting is hereby approved and shall be executed by and delivered to the appropriate officials. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council this 20th day of December, A.D., 2005. ATTEST: David L. Sakrison, Mayor ·• Resolution #27-2005 Pagel of l December 20, 2005 Page 163 of 295C 0 LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 12th day of April , 2005, by and between CITY OF MOAB, Utah, a ------------principal Corporation, herein referred to as LESSOR, and MOAB COUNTRY CLUB, a non-profit Utah Corporation, herein referred to as LESSEE. WITNESSETH: 1. That Lessor, for and in consideration of the rent hereinafter specified to be paid by Lessee, and the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, leases and lets unto Lessee premises situated in Grand County, State of Utah, to-wit: a. Parcel No. 1: The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter ( SWl/ 4 SEl / 4) , Section 15, Township 2 6 South, Range 22 East, SLB&M. b. Parcel No. 2: The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NWl/4 NEl/4), Section 22, Township 26 South, Range 22 East, SLB&M. c. Parcel No. 3: The West One-half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (Wl/2 NEl/4 NEl/4), Section 22, Township 26 South, Range 22 East, SLB&M. d. SE 1/4, Section 15, T26S, R22E, SLB & M., SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 14, T26S, R22E, SLB & M., NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 23, T26S, R22E, SLB & M., The North 500 feet of the E 1/2 NE 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 22, T26S,R22E, SLB & M., and the N 1/2 Nl/2 SW 1/4 NWl/4 Section 23, T26S, R22E, SLB & M. Containing 137.6 acres, more or less. Page 164 of 295C 0 LESS: The following described real property, to-wit: Sl/2 of Nl/2 of SWl/4 of NWl/4 of NEl/4, and the Sl/2 of SWl/4 of NWl/4 of NEl/4, Section 22, T26S, R22E, SLB&M. 2. This lease shall be for a term of ten (10) years from the date of this Agreement. 3. It is understood and agreed that this Lease is granted for the express purpose of operating and maintaining a golf course; however, it is understood and agreed that Lessee shall have the right, in connection with the operation of a golf course, to maintain club house facilities, swimming pools, tennis courts and related activities customarily enjoyed by a non-profit corporation for the entertainment and general welfare of its members and guests, including the sale of alcoholic beverages as provided by the laws of the State of Utah. 4. It is expressly understood and agreed that members of the general public, whether members of the non-profit corporation or not, shall be permitted to play on said golf course under the same conditions and restrictions as if they are dues paying members; however, Lessee shall have the right to regulate play on said golf course for the purpose of preserving the greens and grounds and for maintaining orderly and proper use thereof. 5. Lessee shall have the right to assess its users whatever green fees it shall deem appropriate; however, Lessor shall have the right of review of the fees charged and Lessor may reduce or increase the said fees in accordance with good public policy. 6. It is understood and agreed that Lessee is a non-profit corporation and Lessor shall not, at any time, have the right or option to interfere with the internal affairs of the said corporation. Page 165 of 295C C 3 7. Lessee agrees to maintain the property in good and attractive condition. 8. Lessee may, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, make such changes, alterations or improvements as may be necessary to fit said premises and all buildings, fixtures and improvements of every kind and nature, whenever installed by Lessee, shall, upon termination, remain the property of Lessor. Lessee may purchase such personal property as it shall see fit, and upon termination of this Lease, may remove the same. 9. It is understood and agreed that the above-described premises are situated within the area of the Moab City watershed and that it may become necessary in the future for the City to make use of said area for the purpose of developing water or for protecting the area from contamination. In such event and upon notice from Lessor to Lessee that such use is necessary, the Lessor shall have the right and option to terminate the Lease or any part that may be affected thereby, without compensation to Lessee. 10. The Lessee shall pay to Lessor a sum equal to a 1.5 percent of the annual gross revenue from all annual operating revenue. Said sum shall be paid by June 1 of each year, for the previous one year period ending December 3 0. The first payment under this Agreement shall be made by June 1, 2005. 11. The phrase "annual gross revenue from all annual operating revenue" shall be defined as revenues from all green fees, equipment rental, equipment storage, gross sales from the pro shop and from the gross sales of any future operations that may be conducted by the Page 166 of 295C C Lessee under the provisions of Paragraph 3 above, in any given calendar year. 12. The Lessee shall make available to the Lessor copies of the Lessee's regular financial statements. 13. An independent financial review of the Golf Club, performed by a certified public accountant, shall be submitted annually by the Lessee to the Lessor, on or before June 1. 14. Lessee shall present an Annual Lessor on or before January 30 of each year. Operations Report to the Said report shall detail all operations activity of Lessee for the previous calendar year. 15. It is understood and agreed that the Lessor may, at its expense, make such improvements as it shall deem necessary to repair, preserve, or enlarge said property leased herein, or to make any other improvements deemed necessary by Lessor. Such repair or improvements so made shall be at such time and in such manner so as to cause the Lessee the least amount of disruption to its operation of said golf course. 16. It is understood and agreed that Lessor owns and has responsibility for the maintenance of all water pumps and meters installed and used on the premises as outlined in Paragraph 1. 17. The Lessee shall pay to Lessor for water usage at a rate mutually agreed upon by the two parties. 18. Lessee hereby agrees to provide a summer youth golf program at its sole expense. 19. The Lessee shall assume all risks incidental to or in 4 Page 167 of 295C C connection with the business to be conducted hereunder and shall be solely responsible for all accidents or injuries of any nature to persons or property caused by its operation at these premises. Lessee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Lessor, its authorized agents and representatives, from any and all claims or liability for damage resulting in the death of any person, or loss or damaged property occasioned by or in connection with the use of the premises hereby leased. The Lessee hereby assumes full responsibility for the character, acts and conduct of all persons admitted to said premises, or to any portion of the premises. Lessor assumes no liability or responsibility whatsoever for any property placed in said premises and Lessor is hereby expressly released and discharged from any and all liability for any loss, injury or damage to persons or property that may be sustained by reason of Lessee's occupancy under this Lease. 20. Lessee shall carry, at its own expense, property damage insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 and public liability insurance in an amount of $1,000,000 for any one person and $1,000,000 for any one accident. The Lessor is to be made a co-insured with the Lessee on this insurance and said insurance policy is to contain a rider requiring that the Lessor be notified thirty (30} days in advance of any change or termination of said insurance policies. 21. The parties hereto shall have the option to extend this lease for one additional ten (10} year period under the same terms and 5 Page 168 of 295C G conditions. This option may be exercised by written consent of both parties hereto, prior to April 12, 2015. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and seals on this 12th day of April, 2005. LESSOR: ::~w,~ David L. Sakrison, Mayor LESSEE: MOAB COUNTRY CLUB By: B1~!l!l~--State of Utah ) § County of Grand ) On the 1=Ci day of ~L -'---"-='--------------, personally appeared before me 1?\ LL 13. ViEAtDf2-~~~~--------~' who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. ~~ Notary Public My Commission Expires: Residing in: Grand County 6 Page 169 of 295GOLF COURSE LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE Dv,gi~ ,v1 ~(u_;h°?v' ~; l-0 For good and valuable consideration, The City of Moab, a Utah Municipality, and Moab Country Club mutually agree to a modification of the Golf Course Lease Agreement, dated April 12, 2005, as follows: Sections 10 and 11 of the lease agreement are hereby terminated and the proceeding sections shall be sequentially renumbered. 10. The Lessee shall flay to Lessor a StilB: eqtial to a 1.5 pereeBt of the amiual gross re,;emie from aU ar..flual. Of!eratiftg Fe¥enue. 8aid sum shall be 13aid by June I of each year, fer the previous oae year period endiflg Deeember 30. The first payment llllder this t\greement shall be made by Jmie l, 2005. 11. The phra5e "annual gross RWeDUe from all ar.mial 013eratiag re¥enue11 shal-1 be defme<l as Ftwenues fFom all green fees, equipment rental, eqrapment storage, gross sales from the i,ro shoi, and from the gross sales of any fu.tw:e operatioes that may be oandueted ey the Lessee under the f)FOvisioas of Pamgraph 3 above, in aftY gi¥en ealendar year. APPROVED AND ACCEPTED ON THIS 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2005. LESSOR: ?ST: ( ~./1~·~-Mq1 (2JJ ~ Rachef Ellison, City1 Re-c-or_d_e_r __ LESSEE: State of Utah ) § County of Grand ) By: OAB,~TA;JL-H . .._ 'l,,/ / ,.........,,,_,_, d---David L. Sakrison, Mayor MOAB COUNTRY CLUB By:ef/Ud~ LI Meador, Presii.let /1 11J ---/ _ t ' ·, ti,./\/ On the~ day of. __ -1" . ...e...,u-____ c;,<.CJ...I~ personally appeared before me E$, I l Me 9d er , who duly ackno,dged to me that they executed the same. ~t~c&Ji+ Residing in: Grand County My Commission Expires: l l, Au.J oc r------~-• I .• UIEl,t,OIINI II ' '.. ......u. ... 11 •o•n• 11111,._. I s ."Ii. ~., .. -·------... ~--~   PL-17-28 Agenda Summary  Moab City Council   February 14, 2017  Agenda Item #: 7-6  Title: Consideration to Adopt Resolution #03‐2017, Approving a Conditional Use Permit Concerning  Housing on the Ground Floor for the Mill Creek Multi‐family Housing Project on Property Located  at 1780 East Mill Creek Drive in the C‐4, General Commercial Zone  Staff Presenter(s): Jeff Reinhart, City Planner  Department: Planning and Zoning  Applicant: Mike Bynum, Mike Hogan  Background/Summary:  The City originally received this application in April 2015. On September 24, 2015, the Planning  Commission conditionally approved the site plan and the parking exception for this housing project.  Resolution #09‐2015 established three conditions for the approval of the site plan. Those included:  1.A traffic study shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit; 2.A conditional use permit for housing on the ground floor shall be approved by the City Council; 3.A new site plan showing the adjusted parking of 1 space for each single bedroom and studio unit and 1.5 spaces (54 additional spaces) for all other units shall be submitted for review by the Planning Commission The traffic study was submitted with the amended site plan. On November 10, 2016, the amended site  plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission. The plan showed the changes to the parking with the  granted exception to off‐street spaces, and the required increase in additional spaces for the multi‐room  units. Planning Resolution #17‐2016 recommended that Council approve the conditional use permit with  the conditions:  1.The buildings cannot be located any closer to the property line than currently shown along the northern and eastern boundaries; and 2.The property line on the south side parking area will be adjusted to be part of the development parcel. The attached site plan is an updated version with the additional parking spaces to be included on the  site. Staff has reviewed the space count and determined that the requirement for the additional number  of parking spaces has been satisfied. In addition, the buildings located along the northern property  boundary have been relocated to the south to create an open space of up to forty feet in that area as a  buffer to the adjacent properties. The site plan was approved by the Planning Commission in accordance  with Chapter 17.09.660‐17.09.665.   Page 170 of 295 2  The final step for this project is the Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Dwellings and apartment houses  require conditional use approval as noted in MMC Chapter 17.27.020, Use regulations, (27).   Recommendation of approval of the CUP to City Council was made contingent upon the Planning  Commission receiving the amended site plan that was provided by the applicant.   On November 22, 2016, the Council had their first look at the project and established a public hearing  date for January 10, 2017. The application was tabled until February 14, 2017, so Council could have  time to review the applicable code sections and submittals.   In addition to the parking spaces, the site plan shows that the buildings have been relocated on the  property. They have been moved to the south and into the property to provide a twenty‐five to forty  foot separation from the northern property line.   The review standards are described in Chapter 17.09.530, Conditional uses.  Resolution #03‐2017  contains the findings of the Planning Commission to consider in approving the Conditional Use  Application.  Process  Moab Municipal Code (MMC) Section 17.27.020 (27) states “Dwellings and apartment houses require  conditional use approval as described in Chapter 17.09.530, Conditional uses. MMC Section 17.09.530 is  attached for your convenience.   Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution #03‐2017 to approve  the conditional use permit for dwellings on the ground floor with the conditions listed below:  1.The buildings cannot be located any closer to the property line than currently shown along the northern and eastern boundaries; and 2.The property line on the south side parking area will be adjusted to be part of the development parcel. Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Resolution #03‐2017 to approve the conditional use permit for  dwellings on the ground floor with the following conditions:   1.The buildings cannot be located any closer to the property line than currently shown along the northern and eastern boundaries; and 2.The property line on the south side of the parking area will be adjusted to be part of the development parcel. Attachment(s): Applicant’s Narrative  Amended Plan  Deed Restriction Proposal  Building Elevations  Aerial  Draft Council Resolution #03‐2017  Page 171 of 295 3  Addendum of Code Chapters Page 172 of 295 4  Page 173 of 295 5  Page 174 of 295 City of Moab 2 17 E. Center Street Moab, UT 84532 Dear City Staff, Bz ~~, Business Re"iolution"i Ile January 6 , 2017 This letter demonstrates Millcreek Development, LLC's commitment to place a te n-year deed re striction on one building per each phase of its project, in order to control rent based on 80% - 100% AMI. F urthermore, Millcreek will work with the City in any capacity to legali ze thi s agreement. Sincerely, Millcreek' evelopment, LLC By: Mike Bynum, Managing Member By : Shik Han, Managing Member 7000 Walkabout Ranc h Rd., M oab, UT 84532 6  Page 175 of 295 (8_; I '2 '· UI ; i i i I Ull C:.NG Ul!VAIIONS · """ 2·HD100M 7  Page 176 of 295 Mill Creek Drive & US 191 o~--=1~t;__•Oc::2:ioo11111111--•40~ee t 1 inch = 200 feet N + 8  (DRAFT) CITY OF MOAB  RESOLUTION #03‐2017  A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MULTI‐FAMILY  DEVELOPMENT WITH DWELLINGS ON THE GROUND FLOOR IN THE C‐4 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE)  ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1780 EAST MILL CREEK DRIVE   WHEREAS, Mr. Mike Hogan of Mike Hogan and Associates Construction, with offices at 940 N 1250 W,  Centerville, Utah 84014, as the “Owner” of record of a 6.56 acre parcel of land located in the C‐4  (General Commercial Zone) at 1780 East Mill Creek Drive, Moab, Utah, 84532, has applied for the  approval of a Site Plan to construct multi‐family rental dwellings on the described property; and  WHEREAS, Moab Municipal Code (MMC) Chapter 17.27.020, Use Regulations (27), requires City  approval of apartments and dwellings in accordance with MMC 17.09.530, Conditional use permits; and  WHEREAS, Owner is proposing to construct work force housing rental units and the associated parking  and open space on the property described above; and  WHEREAS, Owner is proposing to construct sufficient parking to include one (1) space per single  bedroom and studio units and one and one half (1.5) spaces for all additional units, for a total of 234  parking spaces to be used by the residents of the development as allowed under an approved parking  exception as permitted in MMC 17.09.220 Q; and    WHEREAS, Owner provided the City of Moab with the necessary documents, plans and drawings to  complete the application for review of the site plan as required by MMC Sections 17.09.530; and  WHEREAS, the City of Moab Planning Commission (“Commission”) reviewed the site plan during a public  hearing in a regularly scheduled meeting on September 24, 2015, to hear evidence of compliance with  the requirements of the pertinent code provisions; and  WHEREAS, at said meeting, the Commission tabled the action of adoption of Resolution #09‐2015 until a  revised site plan was submitted that showed the amended parking plan with “54 additional spaces”; and  WHEREAS, on November 10, 2016, in a regularly scheduled meeting, the Commission reviewed the plan  and Resolution #17‐2016 to conditionally recommend the conditional use permit for dwellings on the  ground floor to the City Council; and    WHEREAS, the Commission, having discussed the pertinent aspects of the development and considered  the Staff recommendation, found that the proposed use satisfies the requirements established in MMC  Chapter 17.09.530, Conditional use permits, and has met the requirements of Title 17.09.531, Conditions  for approval of specific conditional uses, as follows:  1.The proposed conditional use and accessory uses are compatible with adjacent existing uses and other allowed uses in the zoning district. 2.The proposed use has incorporated design features sufficient to protect adjacent uses. 3.The proposed use is not detrimental to the public, health, safety and welfare. 4.Adequate public services are available without reduction of services to other uses. Page 177 of 295 9  5.Proper maintenance of the site shall be provided. 6.The conditional use shall conform to all regulations of this code. 7.The use is consistent with the City of Moab General Plan as amended by Resolution #15‐2009. 8.The applicant has demonstrated that site impacts within the property as well as adjoining properties have been reasonably mitigated appropriate to the topography of the site. 9.The plans are in accordance with the requirements of MMC Chapter 17.09.531, Conditions for approval of specific conditional uses. WHEREAS, the Moab City Council held a public hearing in accordance with MMC 17.09.530 on January  10, 2017, to review the conditional use permit for dwellings on the ground floor and discuss the  pertinent aspects of the development for compliance with MMC Chapter 17.09.531, and agreed with  the Planning Commission and found that the proposed use satisfies the requirements established in the  Moab Municipal Code.  NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Moab City Council, that adoption of Resolution #03‐2017  conditionally approves the application for dwellings on the ground floor to be located at approximately  1780 East Mill Creek Drive in the C‐4 Zone with the following conditions:  1.The buildings cannot be located any closer to the property line than currently shown along the northern and eastern boundaries; and 2.The property line on the south side parking area will be adjusted to be part of the development parcel. ADOPTED AND APPROVED by action of the Moab City Council in open session this 14th day of February,  2017.    ATTEST:  Rachel Stenta Dave Sakrison  Moab City Recorder Mayor  Page 178 of 295 10  Addendum: 17.09.530 Conditional use permits. A. General. “Conditional use” means a land use that, because of its unique characteristics or potential impact on the city, surrounding neighbors, or adjacent land uses, may not be compatible in some areas or may be compatible only if certain conditions are required that mitigate or eliminate detrimental impacts. If the reasonably anticipated detrimental effects of a proposed conditional use cannot be substantially mitigated by the proposal or the imposition of reasonable conditions to achieve compliance with applicable standards, the conditional use may be denied. Conditional use permits may be approved for the uses indicated in the use regulations of the zoning district of the property for which the conditional use permit is requested. F. Planning Commission Review Criteria and Processing. In reviewing a conditional use, the planning commission shall utilize the criteria listed in subsection (H) of this section. 1. Public Hearing Required. The planning commission shall hold a public hearing on any application for a conditional use permit prior to taking any final action on the application. The notification requirements shall be followed as listed in subsection (G) of this section. 2. The criteria listed in subsection (H) of this section shall be used to evaluate the proposal. 3. The planning commission shall convey its recommendation and express its findings to city council by adoption of resolution. G. City Council Processing and Review Criteria. In reviewing a conditional use application, the city council shall utilize the process and criteria listed below. 1. Public Hearing Required. The city council shall hold a public hearing on any application for a conditional use permit prior to taking any final action on the application. 2. Notification Requirements. The city recorder shall cause notice of the public hearing of the city council to be given by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city of Moab without the necessity of notifying property owners by mail. Such published notice shall state the time and place of such hearing and the nature of the subject to be considered and the hearing date shall be at least fifteen days from the date of publication. H. Conditions of Approval. Both the planning commission and the city council shall use the following criteria in reviewing conditional use permit requests. It is specifically understood that certain criteria listed below may not apply to a particular application and that failure to meet one or more of the applicable criteria may be cause for denial. In accordance with state law, the applicant shall adequately demonstrate that the criteria have been met: 1. The proposed conditional use and accessory uses are compatible with adjacent existing uses and other allowed uses in the zoning district. Such compatibility shall be expressed in terms of appearance, architectural scale and features, site design and scope, landscaping, as well as the control of adverse impacts including noise, vibration, smoke, fumes, gas, dust, odor, lighting, glare, traffic minimization or circulation, parking issues, or other undesirable or hazardous conditions. 2. The proposed conditional use has incorporated design features sufficient to protect adjacent uses including but not limited to: service areas, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, safety provisions, access ways to and from the site, buffering, fencing, and site building placement. 3. The proposed use is not detrimental to the public, health, safety and welfare through effective management or prohibition of outdoor storage, a required sewer connection, and proper disposal of waste. 4. Adequate public services such as streets, off-street parking, pedestrian facilities, water, sewer, gas, electricity, police, fire, and EMS protection must be available without the reduction of services to other existing uses. 5. Provisions for proper maintenance of the building, parking and loading areas, drives, lighting, signs, landscaping, etc., shall be provided. Page 179 of 295 11    6. The proposed conditional use shall conform to all regulations of this code concerning adopted plans, hours of operation, policies and requirements for parking and loading, signs, highway access, and all other applicable regulations. 7. The use is consistent with the city of Moab general plan as amended. 8. The applicant must demonstrate that site impacts within the property as well as adjoining properties have been fully mitigated appropriate to the topography of the site. The review of impacts include, at a minimum, slope retention, flood potential, and possible damage to riparian or hillside areas. 9. After considering the public comment relating the criteria listed above in relation to the requested conditional use permit, the planning commission shall adopt a resolution stating their findings of the applicant’s demonstrated ability to meet the criteria for a conditional use permit. Approval or denial of the application by the city council shall be memorialized in the minutes of the meeting. A determination that the applicant has not met one or more of the applicable criteria shall be sufficient to deny the request. The planning commission and the city council, respectively, may establish additional conditions of operation, location, arrangement and construction in the issuance of a conditional use permit if deemed to be in the public interest or to assure compliance with other aspects of the Moab Municipal Code. I. Records. A file containing all documents relevant to the application and disposition of such conditional use permits shall be maintained by the Moab planning department. J. Maximum Density. The maximum density allowed by a conditional use permit shall be no greater than that permitted in the underlying zone district. K. Specific Performance. Action authorized by approval of a conditional use permit must commence within one year of the time the permit is issued. If the permit holder has not commenced action under the permit within this time, the permit shall expire and the holder must apply for a new permit. The planning commission may grant a one-time six-month extension for good cause shown. In order to obtain an extension, the permit holder must apply for the extension in writing before the expiration of the original permit. The application must be submitted to the zoning administrator with a description of the cause for requesting the extension. L. Permit Revocation. 1. The city council may revoke the conditional use permit of any person upon a finding that the holder of the permit has failed to comply with any of the conditions imposed at the time the permit was issued. The city recorder shall cause notice of the revocation to be sent to the holder of the permit and the holder of the permit shall immediately cease any use of the property that was based on the conditional use permit. Violation of this clause shall invoke Section 17.78.030. 2. If the city council revokes a permit under this section, the holder of the permit shall have a right to appeal the revocation. The holder must file the appeal with the city recorder within fifteen days of the date of the notice that the city has revoked the conditional use permit. 3. Upon receipt of the appeal, the city council shall set a hearing on the appeal at its next regularly scheduled meeting which is more than fifteen days after the time the city recorder received the appeal. The city shall supply the permit holder of the time, date and place of the hearing at least fifteen days before the hearing. At the hearing, the permit holder shall have the right to be heard on the revocation. M. Appeals. 1. Any person adversely affected by the final decision of the city council pursuant to this chapter may appeal that decision to the Grand County district court. 2. A judicial action seeking review of a decision by the city council must be filed no later than thirty days from the date of the final decision that is the subject of the action or legal claim. Any action commenced beyond that time shall be subject to summary dismissal. 3. Review of any conditional use permit application shall be based upon the record of proceedings before city council. Upon the commencement of a judicial appeal challenging any decision under this chapter, the city shall transmit to the district court true and correct copies of all submittals, testimony, orders, and file documents comprising the record Page 180 of 295 12    pertaining to the application, including any transcript or tape recordings of proceedings. (Ord. 2016-02 (part), 2016; Ord. 12-09 (part), 2012; Ord. 12-05 (part), 2012; Ord. 11-09 (part), 2011; Ord. 11-01 (part), 2011; Ord. 10-13 (part), 2010; Ord. 10-06 (part), 2010; Ord. 08-05 (part), 2008) 17.09.531 Conditions for approval of specific conditional uses. (1) Dwellings in the C-4 Commercial Zone. All single-family and two-family dwellings shall be subject to the following requirements: A. Minimum wall dimensions of the principal structure, excluding garage, shall be twenty-four feet. B. All principal residential structures shall: 1. Be placed on a slab-on-grade or perimeter foundation as approved by the building department; 2. Have a wood, brick or stucco exterior, or a material that looks similar to wood, brick or stucco; 3. Have a minimum 4:12 roof pitch and a one foot overhang (structures constructed in the traditional southwest Spanish style are exempt from this requirement); 4. Allowed accessory structures shall not exceed twenty-five percent of the rear yard; 5. Buffering is required in accordance with other provisions of this chapter; 6. Minimum Setbacks for Residential Structures in the C-4 Zone. Minimum Setbacks for Residential Structures in the C-4 Zone Front yard 30 feet Side yard 15 feet Rear yard 20 feet           Page 181 of 295 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING  February 28, 2017          Agenda Item #: 7‐7    Title: Approval of Proposed Resolution #06-2017 – Amending the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Annual Budget   Fiscal Impact: Unknown Staff Presenter(s): Rachel Stenta, City Recorder/Assistant City Manager  Department: Recorder/Administration Applicant: N/A       Background/Summary:  After the public hearing, a few additional changes are necessary. As you may recall, an addition of a grant and expenditure were added into the Millcreek Fund. Also, the construction reimbursement agreement that was approved last December between the City of Moab, UDOT (Club Utah) will necessitate reflecting that pass through revenue and expense in the capital projects fund of $25,000. Also, you have a Memorandum of Understanding on your agenda for Communities that Care that supposes a $10,000 contribution this Fiscal Year that is not currently budgeted. That amount could be added to the General Fund expenditures with a corresponding decrease in the contribution to the Capital Projects Fund - at the Council’s discretion. These changes can be made to the Resolution on Tuesday if agreeable to the Council.     Options: Approve, deny or postpone    Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the amended budget.    Recommended Motion: I move to approve (insert agenda item)    Attachment(s):  Proposed Resolution #06-2017  Page 182 of 295 Resolution #06-2017 Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION # 06‐2017    A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2016/2017 BUDGET    WHEREAS, the City of Moab has proposed to amend the 2016/2017 fiscal year budget for the various funds;    NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE 2016/2017 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET SHALL BE AMENDED AS  FOLLOWS:  Amended Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Budget          Amended    Amended          Revenue  Expenditures  1. General Fund ($10,531,341) $  10,531,341   2. Recreation Fund ($ 590,928) $ 590,928  3. Millcreek Fund ( $7,195) $ 7,195  4. Capital Projects Fund ($ 2,596,159) $ 2,596,159  5. Enterprise Water & Sewer Operating ($ 1,757,996) $ 2,160,132  6. Enterprise Water & Sewer Non‐Operating ($12,112,400)  7. Enterprise Water & Sewer Capital   $ 14,270,455    2016/2017 Fiscal Year Budget Amendments     FUNDS   Account # Account Name Adjustment Amount    General Fund   Revenue   10‐31‐300 Sales & Use Taxes  $              (121,000.00)  10‐31‐400 Franchise Taxes  $                   36,804.00   10‐31‐500 Highway Taxes  $                (61,800.00)  10‐31‐600 Transient Room Taxes  $              (107,000.00)  10‐31‐700 Resort Community Taxes  $              (371,800.00)  10‐31‐800 Energy Taxes  $                   62,682.00   10‐32‐210 Building Permits ‐ City  $                (10,000.00)  10‐32‐211 Building Permits ‐ Commercial  $                (25,000.00)  10‐32‐213 Plan check fees  $                   (2,300.00)  10‐34‐711 MRAC Fitness Admissions  $                   (2,200.00)  10‐34‐717 MRAC ‐ Showers  $                   (7,000.00)  10‐34‐721 MRAC Admissions Aquat/Fitn  $                      (500.00)   Total Revenue  $              (609,114.00)  General Fund   Expenses   General Government      10‐416‐11 Salary Differential  $              (189,781.00)  10‐416‐29 Rent of Property or Equipment  $                     1,800.00   Administrative      10‐414‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                107,000.00   Page 183 of 295 Resolution #06-2017 Page 2 of 5 10‐414‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     1,000.00   10‐414‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                   50,750.00   10‐414‐13 Employee Benefits  $                   19,440.00   10‐414‐13 Employee Benefits  $                   18,500.00   10‐414‐16 Unemployment  $                     4,000.00   10‐414‐22 Public Notices  $                     8,000.00   Recorder      10‐415‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                   13,508.00   10‐415‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     2,702.00   10‐415‐15 Overtime  $                     2,000.00   10‐415‐22 Public Notices  $                     3,000.00   10‐415‐31 Professional & Technical  $                   20,000.00   Engineering      10‐419‐31 Professional & Technical  $                   10,000.00   10‐419‐31.1 Plan Review Services  $                   20,000.00   Treasurer      10‐420‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     7,370.00   10‐420‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     1,480.00   Police      10‐421‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                   48,500.00   10‐421‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     9,700.00   Attorney Services      10‐422‐31 Professional & Technical  $                   60,000.00   Animal Control      10‐426‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     6,570.00   10‐426‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     1,314.00   Streets      10‐440‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                   21,745.00   10‐440‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     4,349.00   10‐440‐46 Special Departmental Supplies  $                     6,000.00   Facilities      10‐443‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                   12,000.00   10‐443‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     2,400.00   Parks      10‐451‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                   28,000.00   10‐451‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     5,600.00   Aquatic Center      10‐452‐08 Maintenance Salaries  $                   17,000.00   10‐452‐09 Lifeguard Salaries  $                   20,000.00   10‐452‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     9,700.00   10‐452‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     5,000.00   Planning      10‐418‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     2,500.00   10‐418‐13 Employee Benefits  $                         500.00   Transfers      Page 184 of 295 Resolution #06-2017 Page 3 of 5 10‐480‐61 Transfer to Capital Projects Fund  $                209,949.00   10‐480‐86 Contribution to Recreation Fund  $                   37,518.00    Total Expenses  $                609,114.00     Recreation Fund   Revenue   23‐33‐562 City of Moab Contribution  $                (37,518.00)   Total Revenue  $                (37,518.00)  Expenses   23‐640‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     4,438.00   23‐640‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                   11,034.00   23‐640‐11 Salary Differential  $                (14,148.00)  23‐640‐13 Employee Benefits  $                         888.00   23‐640‐13 Employee Benefits  $                   10,756.00   23‐800‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     2,300.00   23‐800‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                   11,034.00   23‐800‐13 Employee Benefits  $                         460.00   23‐800‐13 Employee Benefits  $                   10,756.00      Total Expenses  $                   37,518.00     Millcreek Project Fund    Revenue   28‐33‐579 Future Grants ($3,597)  28‐39‐210 Beginning Fund Balance ($3,598)   Total Revenue ($7,195)  Expenses   28‐400‐89 Trails                      $7,195    Total Expenses               $7,195    Capital Projects Fund   Revenue   41‐36‐124 Grants and Donations  $                (10,000.00)  41‐36‐224 UDOT Aid Project  $                180,000.00   41‐39‐222 Transfer from General Fund  $              (209,949.00)  41‐39‐561 Cap Projects Beg Fund Balance  $              (295,051.00)   Total Revenue  $              (335,000.00)  Expenses   41‐791‐50 Police Equipment  $                   10,000.00   41‐440‐83 Streets Equipment  $                (32,000.00)  41‐750‐46 Recreation/Parks Equip  $                   32,000.00   41‐780‐25 Trail & Bridge Improvements  $                175,000.00   41‐770‐31 Muni Bldg Project  $                150,000.00   Page 185 of 295 Resolution #06-2017 Page 4 of 5  Total Expenses  $                335,000.00     Water & Sewer Fund   Operating Revenue   51‐37‐260 Water connections  $                (25,000.00)  51‐56‐900 Sundry Revenue  $                (60,000.00)  51‐57‐440 Sewer Connections  $                (12,636.00)   Total Operating Revenue  $                (97,636.00)    Non‐operating Revenue   51‐39‐535 W/S Beg Fund Balance  $                (60,500.00)  51‐39‐535 W/S Beg Fund Balance  $              (129,500.00)  51‐56‐250 WWTP Agency ILA Contribution  $              (800,000.00)  51‐56‐200 Sewer WRF Financing  $          (6,650,000.00)   Total Non‐Operating Revenue  $          (7,640,000.00)    Operating Expenses   51‐500‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     5,300.00   51‐500‐11 Salary Differential  $                (23,360.00)  51‐500‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     1,060.00   51‐500‐46 Special Departmental Sup  $                     5,500.00   51‐600‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     8,000.00   51‐600‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     1,600.00   51‐600‐31 Professional & Technical  $                   80,000.00   51‐600‐46 Special Departmental Sup  $                   60,000.00   51‐610‐10 Salaries and Wages  $                     6,165.00   51‐610‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     1,235.00   51‐610‐31 Professional & Technical  $                   12,636.00    Total Operating Expenses  $                176,196.00     Capital Expenses   Projects:   Impact Fee Project Impact Fee/Rate Study  $                   20,000.00   Impact Fee Project South Trunk Line Planning & Design  $              (200,000.00)  Impact Fee Project WRF Design & Permitting  $          (3,400,000.00)  Impact Fee Project WRF Construction  $             9,250,000.00   Impact Fee Project WRF Construction Administration  $                660,000.00   Impact Fee Project WRF Site Prep  $             1,150,000.00   Impact Fee Project Sanitary Sewer Master Plan  $                   20,000.00   Impact Fee Project Water Tank Design & Construction  $          (1,030,000.00)  Impact Fee Project Water Storage & dist Master Plan  $                   30,000.00   Sewer Project WWTP Effluent Pipe Replacement  $                (50,000.00)   Total Capital Projects  $             6,450,000.00     Direct Purchases:   Page 186 of 295 Resolution #06-2017 Page 5 of 5 1643 ‐ Meters Water Meters  $                   40,000.00   1653 ‐ Manhole Replacement Project Sewer Manhole Replacement  $                   30,000.00   1661.2 ‐ Equipment ‐ water Compressors  $                   40,000.00    Total Direct Purchases  $                110,000.00     Storm Water Utility Fund   Capital Expenses   Projects:   Minor Storm Water Projects Minor Storm Water Projects  $                (25,000.00)  Storm Water Master Plan Storm Water Master Plan  $                   25,000.00    Total Capital Projects  $                                  ‐                         PASSED AND ADOPTED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of the City of Moab this 28th  day of February, 2017.      David L. Sakrison    Mayor  ATTEST:      Rachel E. Stenta  City of Moab   Page 187 of 295 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING  February 28, 2017        Agenda Item #: 7‐8       Title:  Proposed Ordinance #2017‐09 ‐  Draft Code Revision to Title 2, Chapter 9, Moab Water  Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board, to establish a citizen advisory board  to inform the governing body on matters related to Water Conservation and Drought  Management.   Staff Presenter:  Eve Tallman  Department:  Administration      Summary:   In December, 2016 the City Council adopted the Moab Water Conservation Plan  Update for 2016. The plan calls for the establishment of a citizens’ advisory committee for  water conservation and drought management. This board shall advise the governing body  on the current water conservation plan, annual Moab City Water Conservation and Drought  Management program budget and capital expenditures, grant applications, appointments to  the board, water conservation and drought management initiatives, and proposed policy  and code changes.       Options:  The amendment to Title 2 does not require a public hearing, but the Council has  the option to hold a public hearing. The City Council may approve the ordinance as  proposed, approve with changes, request changes and schedule a second reading at a future  Council meeting, or set a public hearing date for a future Council meeting.      Staff recommendation:  Approve Ordinance #2017‐09 as proposed.       Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Ordinance 2017‐09 as proposed.”      Attachment(s):   Ordinance #2017‐09 and Chapter 2.090      Page 188 of 295 CITY OF MOAB ORDINANCE NO. 2017-09, AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD The following findings describe the intent and purpose of this ordinance: a. Pursuant to Utah Code Annotated § 73-10-32 municipal culinary water providers are required to adopt a water conservation plan and periodically update the plan every five years. b. The City of Moab adopted its update of the Moab Water Conservation Plan by Resolution No. 35-2016 on December 13, 2016. b. Each water conservation plan is required to include goals for water conservation and implementation measures. c. One of the recommendations of the 2016 Water Conservation Plan is the creation of an advisory board to study measures to be implemented and make recommendations to the City Council. The City Council finds that it is in the best interests of the citizens of the City of Moab that this ordinance be enacted. Sections: 2.90.010 Composition of board. 2.90.020 Appointment process. 2.90.030 Terms of office. 2.90.040 Responsibilities of the Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board. 2.90.010 Composition of board. A. The Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board (the Board) shall consist of seven members, who shall be residents of the City of Moab. 2.90.020 Appointment process. A. All Board members shall be appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by action of the City Council. Page 189 of 295 B. City staff will review applications and make recommendations to the Mayor for the first Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management advisory board. Thereafter, the Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board will make recommendations to the Mayor regarding the filling of vacancies on the board. 2.90.030 Terms of office. For the first board appointments, four members shall be appointed for two-year terms, and three members for three-year terms. All subsequent appointments shall be for two- year terms. Board members are subject to reappointment for new terms and there shall be no limit to terms. 2.90.040 Responsibilities of the Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board. A. The Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory board, in an advisory capacity, shall: 1. Adopt bylaws and a mission statement; 2. Make recommendations to City staff and the City Council regarding implementation of the Moab Water Conservation Plan and updates to the text of the plan; 3. Provide recommendations to the City staff regarding annual water conservation and drought management program budgets, water-related capital expenditures, and grant applications; 4. Provide recommendations to the Mayor and City Council regarding appointments to the Board; 5. Consider and recommend policy or ordinance changes pertaining to water conservation; 6. Perform strategic planning and annual program evaluations for the Moab water conservation and drought management program; and Page 190 of 295 7. Provide technical guidance to City staff on water-related utility planning. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. Approved and adopted by a majority of the Moab City Council as of the date set forth below. _______________________ _______________ Mayor David Sakrison Date Attest: ________________________ ________________ Rachel Stenta, Recorder Date Page 191 of 295 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING  February 28, 2017        Agenda Item #: 8‐1  Title: Approval of an Equipment Lease with Xerox Corporation  Fiscal Impact:   A cost of $358.99/month; $4307.88/year. A total of $21,539.40 over  the term of the 60 month lease.  Staff Presenter(s): Carmella Galley  Department: Administration  Applicant: n/a    Background/Summary:   We would like to trade in the first floor copier for a newer model that utilizes newer  technology.  The current copier was a hand me down from another department over  ten years ago and has outlived its usefulness. The proposed copier is on the state of  Utah Cooperative Purchasing contract and in accordance with our procurement code  does not require a competitive process since the state has already conducted one.       Options: The City Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny or postpone  the item.     Staff Recommendation:  City staff recommends approval of this equipment lease.    Recommended Motion:   “I move to approve item #8‐1 ”     Attachment(s):   Equipment lease  State Contract  Lease Agreement      Page 192 of 295 Page 193 of 295 Proposal Prepared for City of Moab -Admin 1 st Floor January 27, 2017 -60 Month Lease Xerox WorkCentre 7855 -55 page per minute Color Copy, Print, Air Print, Scan to Network, Scan to Email, Scan to and print from USB, Fax, LAN Fax, Connect Key Du p lex Automatic Document Feeder at 80 simpl ex, 160 duplex impress io ns per minute, 2 -520 sh eet paper trays, 1-867 shee t pap er tray, 1-1,133 sheet paper tray, 100 sheet bypa ss tray, Professiona l fini sher (multi-position stap ling, 3-ho le punch, v-fold, booklet creation), delivery, software in sta ll ation and user training 60 Month FMV Lease Proposed Estimated Cost . Payment Xerox 7855 Lease Payment $227.15 Monthly Maintenance and Supplies Base Charge included -Black and white printed page s each billed at $0.0050 -Color printed page s each billed at $0.0500 Xerox 7855 Lease Payment & Estimated Operating Cost $227.15 Estimated Cost/month based on pre se nt 12 month averages (b&w) 2,398 x .005 $11.99 Estimated Cost/month based on present 12 month averages (color) 2,397 X .05 $119.85 Total $358.99 Additional Information -Maintenance and Supplies Costs are FI XED FOR 60 MONTHS -Scanning is FREE included -Service Credits included -Delivery & Installation included -On-site Training included Prepared by Scott Turner -scott@gixds.com -(970) 256-1005 ~~ Doc t Services 1048 Independent Avenue St A 107 Grand Junction. CO (970) 256-1005 phone -(970) 256 -7135 fax Lease Agreement 0 6 2 1 8 4 7 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 WS N66505 02/23/2017 12:12:34 Confidential - Copyright© 2008 XEROX CORPORATION. All rights reserved.Page 1 of 2 Customer:MOAB, CITY OF BillTo:CITY OF MOAB ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 217 EAST CENTER ST MOAB, UT 84532-2431 Install: CITY OF MOAB ADMINISTRATION 217 EAST CENTER ST MOAB, UT 84532-2431 Tax ID#: - State or Local Government Negotiated Contract : 072721500 Authorized Signature Customer acknowledges receipt of the terms of this agreement which consists of 2 pages including this face page. Signer: Dave Sakrison Phone: (435)259-5121 Signature:Date: TOTAL SATISFACTI O N GUARANTE E Thank You for your business! This Agreement is proudly presented by Xerox and Scott Turner (970)256-1005 For information on your Xerox Account, go to www.xerox.com/AccountManagement Solution Product Description Item Agreement Information Trade Information Requested Install Date 1. W7855PT (W7855PT TANDEM) - Envelope Feed Tray - I-series-1 Line Fax - Professional Finishr - Convenience Stapler - Customer Ed - Analyst Services Lease Term: 60 months Purchase Option: FMV - Xerox WC7345P S/N FKA934481 Trade-In 2/28/2017 Monthly Pricing Item Lease Minimum Payment Print Charges Meter Volume Band Per Print Rate Maintenance Plan Features 1. W7855PT $227.15 1: Black and White Impressions All Prints $0.0050 2: Color Impressions All Prints $0.0500 - Consumable Supplies Included for all prints - Pricing Fixed for Term Total $227.15 Minimum Payments (Excluding Applicable Taxes) Page 194 of 295 Lease Agreement 0 6 2 1 8 4 7 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 WS N66505 02/23/2017 12:12:35 Confidential - Copyright© 2008 XEROX CORPORATION. All rights reserved.Page 2 of 2 Terms and Conditions INTRODUCTION: 1. NEGOTIATED CONTRACT. The Products are subject solely to the terms in the Negotiated Contract identified on the face of this Agreement, and, for any option you have selected that is not addressed in the Negotiated Contract, the then-current standard Xerox terms for such option. GOVERNMENT TERMS: 2. REPRESENTATIONS & WARRANTIES. This provision is applicable to governmental entities only. You represent and warrant, as of the date of this Agreement, that: (1) you are a State or a fully constituted political subdivision or agency of the State in which you are located and are authorized to enter into, and carry out, your obligations under this Agreement and any other documents required to be delivered in connection with this Agreement (collectively, the "Documents"); (2) the Documents have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by you in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances and regulations (including all applicable laws governing open meetings, public bidding and appropriations required in connection with this Agreement and the acquisition of the Products) and are valid, legal, binding agreements, enforceable in accordance with their terms; (3) the person(s) signing the Documents have the authority to do so, are acting with the full authorization of your governing body and hold the offices indicated below their signatures, each of which are genuine; (4) the Products are essential to the immediate performance of a governmental or proprietary function by you within the scope of your authority and will be used during the Term only by you and only to perform such function; and (5) your payment obligations under this Agreement constitute a current expense and not a debt under applicable state law and no provision of this Agreement constitutes a pledge of your tax or general revenues, and any provision that is so construed by a court of competent jurisdiction is void from the inception of this Agreement. 3. FUNDING. This provision is applicable to governmental entities only. You represent and warrant that all payments due and to become due during your current fiscal year are within the fiscal budget of such year and are included within an unrestricted and unencumbered appropriation currently available for the purchase/maintenance of the Products, and it is your intent to use the Products for the entire term and to make all payments required under this Agreement. If (1) through no action initiated by you, your legislative body does not appropriate funds for the continuation of this Agreement for any fiscal year after the first fiscal year and has no funds to do so from other sources, and (2) you have made a reasonable but unsuccessful effort to find a creditworthy assignee acceptable to Xerox in its sole discretion within your general organization who can continue this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated. To effect this termination, you must, at least 30 days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year for which your legislative body does not appropriate funds, notify Xerox in writing that your legislative body failed to appropriate funds and that you have made the required effort to find an assignee. Your notice must be accompanied by payment of all sums then owed through the current year under this Agreement and must certify that the canceled Equipment is not being replaced by equipment performing similar functions during the ensuing fiscal year. You will return the Equipment, at your expense, to a location designated by Xerox and, when returned, the Equipment will be in good condition and free of all liens and encumbrances. You will then be released from any further payment obligations beyond those payments due for the current fiscal year (with Xerox retaining all sums paid to date). PRICING PLAN/OFFERING SELECTED: 4. FIXED PRICING. If "Pricing Fixed for Term" is identified in Maintenance Plan Features, the maintenance component of the Minimum Payment and Print Charges will not increase during the initial Term of this Agreement. GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS: 5. REMOTE SERVICES. Certain models of Equipment are supported and serviced using data that is automatically collected by Xerox or transmitted to or from Xerox by the Equipment connected to your network ("Remote Data") via electronic transmission to a secure off-site location ("Remote Data Access"). Remote Data Access also enables Xerox to transmit Releases of Software to you and to remotely diagnose and modify Equipment to repair and correct malfunctions. Examples of Remote Data include product registration, meter read, supply level, Equipment configuration and settings, software version, and problem/fault code data. Remote Data may be used by Xerox for billing, report generation, supplies replenishment, support services, recommending additional products and services, and product improvement/development purposes. Remote Data will be transmitted to and from you in a secure manner specified by Xerox. Remote Data Access will not allow Xerox to read, view or download the content of any of your documents or other information residing on or passing through the Equipment or your information management systems. You grant the right to Xerox, without charge, to conduct Remote Data Access for the purposes described above. Upon Xerox's request, you will provide contact information for Equipment such as name and address of your contact and IP and physical addresses/locations of Equipment. You will enable Remote Data Access via a method prescribed by Xerox, and you will provide reasonable assistance to allow Xerox to provide Remote Data Access. Unless Xerox deems Equipment incapable of Remote Data Access, you will ensure that Remote Data Access is maintained at all times Maintenance Services are being performed. Page 195 of 295 Page 196 of 295 SOVEREIGN LANDS GENERAL PERMIT NO. 720 00094 The STATE OF UTAH, acting by and through the DIVISION OF FORESTRY, FIRE & STATE LANDS (DIVISION), hereby issues to the MOAB CITY, 217 East Center Street, Moab UT 84532 (PERMITTEE), a sovereign lands General Permit on the following described tract of sovereign land: Township 26 South, Range 21 East, Section 2, SLB&M Beginning at a point located S59° 26' 41 "W, a distance of 2242.54 Feet from the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, T 26S, R 21 E, Salt Lake Base and Meridian in Grand County, Utah; running thence the following four courses; S55° 02' 25"W a distance of 88.04 feet, N34° 57' 35"W a distance of 160.00 feet, N55° 02' 25"E a distance of 88.04 feet, S34° 57' 35"E" a distance of 160.00 feet to the point of beginning. County: Grand County Acres: 0.32 (app.) The DIVISION issues this General Permit in order that the PERMITTEE may use the above described land for the purpose hereinafter described consistent with the responsibilities and obligations of the State under the Public Trust doctrine, and statutes and rules governing the management and use of sovereign lands. Moab City will construct, operate, repair and maintain an outfall structure on the bed and bank of the Colorado River. Furthermore, Moab City will treat all sewerage to meet state and federal water quality standards. TO HA VE AND TO HOLD for a term not to exceed 30 years EXPIRING on December 31, 2047, subject to any and all existing valid rights in said land and subject also to the following terms and conditions: 1. Term of Agreement. PERMITTEE agrees that this General Permit will be terminated at the end of the term stated above unless PERMITTEE submits a written request for renewal of this General Permit to continue said activity on sovereign lands at this location AT LEAST three months prior to the expiration date of this agreement and renewal is approved by the DIVISION. 2. Regulatory Compliance. This permit is made pursuant to the provisions of all applicable laws and subject to the rules and regulations of the departments and agencies of the State of Utah presently in effect and to such laws, rules and regulations as may be hereafter promulgated by the state. PERMITTEE, in exercising the privileges granted by this permit, shall also comply with the provisions of all valid federal, state, county, and municipal laws, ordinances, and regulations including but not limited to the 1972 Clean Water Act and Utah State Division of Water Quality standards, which are applicable to the subject tract and operations covered by this permit. Page 197 of 295 General Permit 720-00094 Moab City Page2 3. Sovereign Land. This permit is expressly subject and subordinate to the right of the State of Utah to manage and control the bed of the Colorado River. 4. Liability and Indemnification. PERMITTEE shall be liable for all damage incurred in connection with any activity it undertakes or work authorized by this permit. PERMITTEE shall indemnify and hold DIVISION harmless against any and all liability, including attorney fees, of any nature imposed upon, incurred by, or asserted against DIVISION which in any way relates to or arises out of the activity or presence of PERMITTEE, its servants, employees, agents, sublessees, assignees, or invitees. 5. Bonding. The PERMITTEE agrees that, for good cause shown, at any time during the term of this permit, the DIVISION may require that the amount of an existing bond be increased or if a bond has not been previously required, DIVISION may require PERMITTEE to post with the DIVISION a bond with an approved corporate surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Utah, or such other surety as may be acceptable to the DIVISION, in a penal sum to be determined by DIVISION, said bond to be conditioned upon full compliance with all terms and conditions of this permit and the rules relating hereto. The amount of this bond shall not be deemed to limit any liability of PERMITTEE. 6. Structures. PERMITTEE agrees that there will be no permanent structure constructed on sovereign land or any other surface-disturbing activities on the sovereign land described above unless specifically authorized by DIVISION in writing. 7. Claims to Damage. PERMITTEE hereby waives any and all claims to damage caused directly or indirectly from DIVISION'S activities to control, influence or manage the bed of the Colorado River, including but not limited to all breaching, diking, pumping, diversion, upstream water development, flood control works, granting of rights-of-way, wildlife or recreation development or any other management activities or programs that the state deems appropriate. 8. Water Levels. PERMITTEE hereby acknowledges that the level of the Colorado River may fluctuate either naturally or due to management activities of the State of Utah, and PERMITTEE covenants that its use of the permitted land will not limit or interfere with the state's activities or programs to control, influence or manage the bed of the Colorado River, including but not limited to the control or management of the level of the same. 9. Access. PERMITTEE agrees to allow the DIVISION free and unrestricted access to and upon all portions of the subject tract located on sovereign lands at all reasonable times for all lawful and proper purposes consistent with the intent of this permit or with the reasonable exercise and enjoyment by the PERMITTEE of the rights and privileges granted herein. Furthermore, public access to sovereign lands shall not be restricted in any manner provided that such access is obtained without trespassing across private land. Page 198 of 295 General Permit 720-00094 Moab City Page3 Public use of private improvements on sovereign lands may only be restricted by PERMITTEE with DIVISION's verbal or written approval. 10. Assignment, Sublease, and Commercial Use. PERMITTEE shall not assign this permit, in whole or in part, nor sublease the permitted premises, nor allow unauthorized or commercial use of the premises without obtaining the prior written consent of the DIVISION. The DIVISION may require separate leases for other land uses within the permitted boundary. The PERMITTEE shall not be relieved of the responsibilities or liabilities assumed hereunder by virtue of any assignment or sublease to a third party unless DIVISION provides written approval as provided herein, the third party is acceptable to the DIVISION as a PERMITTEE, and the third party assumes in writing all of the obligations of the PERMITTEE under the terms of this permit as to the balance of the term of this permit and subject to such conditions as may be necessary for the protection of the public interest. 11. Public Trust. This General Permit issued by the DIVISION on sovereign land is subject to a public trust and may be revoked at any time if necessary to fulfill public trust and statutory responsibilities. 12. Termination of Permit for Breach. This permit may be terminated by DIVISION upon breach of any conditions hereof. If DIVISION determines that the PERMITTEE, its assigns or successors in interest, have breached any conditions of this permit, DIVISION shall provide notice of the breach in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, specifying the particular breach. The PERMITTEE shall have thirty (30) days from the date of such notice, or such longer period as may be required under the circumstances as approved by the DIVISION to correct such breach. If PERMITTEE fails to correct such breach within such period, DIVISION may terminate this permit upon thirty (30) days notice; provided, however, such termination shall not release PERMITTEE from liability for damage prior to such termination. 13. Removal of Structures. PERMITTEE shall have the right to remove any improvements and any personal property placed on the land by PERMITTEE, provided that the same shall be removed within ninety (90) days after the expiration of the term of this permit, provided that the PERMITTEE shall properly restore any damage caused thereby to the subject tract or any improvements remaining thereon; provided further, that DIVISION shall also have the right to retain without compensation to PERMITTEE, but with costs of removal and disposal chargeable to PERMITTEE, those improvements and items of personal property left upon the permitted premises beyond ninety (90) days after the expiration of this permit. Page 199 of 295 General Permit 720-00094 Moab City Page4 14. Title. DIVISION claims title in fee simple, but does not warrant to PERMITTEE the validity of title to the permitted premises. PERMITTEE shall have no claim from damages or refund against the DIVISION for any claimed failure or deficiency of DIVISION'S title to said lands or for interference by any third party. 15. Sanitation. PERMITTEE shall maintain said lands in good condition and at its own expense, free from any nuisance. Surface areas will be cleaned of all trash and debris to the satisfaction of the DIVISION. PERMITTEE shall maintain the permitted premises to standards of repair, orderliness, neatness, sanitation, and safety as required by law and applicable regulations. No waste or by-products shall be discharged which contain any substance in concentrations which will result in substantial harm to fish and wildlife, or to human water supplies. Storage facilities for materials capable of causing water pollution, if accidentally discharged, shall be located so as to prevent any spillage into waters, or channels leading into water, that would result in substantial harm to fish and wildlife or to human water supplies. 16. Protection of Survey Monuments. PERMITTEE shall take reasonable precautions to protect, in place, all public land survey monuments and private property corners. 17. Historical Sites and Specimens. It is hereby understood and agreed that all treasure- trove and all articles of antiquity in or upon the subject lands are and shall remain the property of the State of Utah. PERMITTEE shall report any discovery of a "site" or "specimen" to the Division of State History in compliance with the provisions of applicable state and federal law. 18. Third Party Leasing. PERMITER expressly reserves the right to lease said lands to third parties for mineral exploration and/or related activities. 19. Water Rights. If PERMITTEE shall initiate or establish any water right on the permitted premises, such right shall become an appurtenance of the permitted premises. PERMITTEE agrees that any existing application to appropriate water on said state land shall be transferred to the DIVISION after the application has been completed, without any cost to the State. It is expressly understood and agreed that this permit does not confer any rights upon PERMITTEE to use any water presently developed on the subject lands. 20. Vegetation and Tree Removal. PERMITTEE acknowledges that scraping and removing trees or vegetation is prohibited unless specifically authorized by this agreement or by DIVISION in writing. If PERMITTEE secures an U.S. Army Corps permit for sovereign land the PERMITEE shall notify the DIVISION in writing within 15 days of Corp's permit approval. Page 200 of 295 General Permit 720-00094 Moab City Page5 21. Fire Prevention. PERMITTEE shall at all times observe reasonable precautions to prevent fire on the permitted premises and shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of any governmental agency having jurisdiction. In the event of a fire on the permitted premises proximately caused by PERMITTEE, its servants, employees, agents, sublessees, assignees, or licensees which necessitates suppression action by the State Forester, PERMITTEE agrees to reimburse DIVISION for the cost of such fire suppression action. 22. Applicable Laws and Toxic Substances. The PERMITTEE(S) shall comply with all applicable local, State and Federal laws and regulations existing or hereafter enacted or promulgated. In any event, the PERMITTEE(S) shall comply with the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, as amended (15 U.S.C. 2601, et seq.) with regard to any toxic substances that are used, generated by or stored on the permit area or on facilities authorized under this right-of-entry. Additionally, any release of toxic substances (leaks, spills, etc.) in excess of the reportable quantity established by 40 CFR, Part 117, shall be reported as required by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, requested by any Federal agency or State government as a result of a reportable release or spill of any toxic substances shall be furnished to the authorized officer concurrent with the filing of the reports to the involved Federal agency or State government. 23. Hazardous Waste. The PERMITTEE agrees to indemnify the State of Utah against any liability arising from the release of any hazardous substance or hazardous waste (as these terms are defined in the Comprehensive Response, Compensation Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. or the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 690 I et seq.) based on PERMITTEE' S activity on the sovereign land covered by this General Permit. This indemnification applies without regard to whether a release is caused by the PERMITTEE, its agent, or unrelated third parties. 24. Limited Use. The PERMITTEE agrees that the sovereign land usage permitted under this General Permit will not be used for any other purpose than for the purposes set forth in this permit. 25. Private Rights. The PERMITTEE acknowledges that no private rights are associated with the use and activities of the permit. Public access and use may only be restricted under R652-70-2300. Page 201 of 295 General Permit 720-00094 Moab City Page 6 26. Notice. Any notic e conte mplated he re in to be served up o n P ERMITTEE s hall be in writing and shall be deeme d s uffi cient if d e posited in the United States mail, po st age prep aid and certified or registe red, and addressed as fo ll ows: Moab C it y Mayor 2 17 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 or at any such other address as PERMITTEE may from time to time designate by written notice to DIVISIO N . The pro v is ions h ereof shall inure to and be binding upon the s ucce sso rs and assign s of P ERMITT EE.APPROV ED AS TO FORM: SEAN D . REYES ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: 3 ---.£_D _j_J__ Fredric J. Donaldson Ass ista nt Attorney Gen e ra l Page 202 of 295 General Permit 720-00094 Moab City Page7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the State of Utah, by and through the Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands, has caused these presents to be executed this _ day of , 2017. DIVISION: STATE OF UTAH STATE OF UTAH ) § COUNTY OF SALT LAKE) BY: DIVISION OF FORESTRY, FIRE AND STATE LANDS 1594 West North Temple, Suite 3520 PO Box 145703 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5703 Brian L. Cottam, Director On the __ day of , 2017, personally appeared before me, who being by me duly sworn did say that he is the Director of the Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands of the State of Utah, and said Richard J. Buehler acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the Division. Given under my hand and seal this __ day of _____ , 2017. Notary Public Page 203 of 295 STATE OF COUNTY OF General Permit 720-00094 Moab City Page8 PERMITIEE: Moab City BY: ) : § ) 217 East Center Moab, Utah 84532 David Sakrison, Moab City Mayor On the day of , 2017, personally appeared before me, signer(s) of the above instrument who duly acknowledged to me thats/he executed the same. Given under my hand and seal this ___ day of _______ ,. 2017. Notary Public   PL-17-27 Agenda Summary  Moab City Council Meeting  February 14, 2017  Agenda Item #: 8-3  Title: Consideration to Adopt Resolution #10‐2017, Approving an Improvements Agreement for the  Buen Camino Boundary Line Adjustment Located at 459 and 469 Bowen Circle in the R‐2, Single‐ and Two‐ Family Residential Zone   Staff Presenter(s): Jeff Reinhart, Planning Director  Department: Planning and Zoning  Applicant: Chad Harris, Property Owner  Background/Summary:  The City received an application from Chad Harris for this simple boundary line adjustment on February  16, 2015. On January 10, 2017, the City Council approved the boundary line adjustment without  conditions. However, because there are some public improvements that are usually required as a  function of the building permit, an Improvements Agreement is necessary. The Development Improvements Agreement, with exhibits, is attached for your review. This final step  will allow the applicant to obtain a building permit.   Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council adopt Resolution #10‐2017 and approve the  agreement between the City and Chad and Margaret Harris for the Buen Camino Boundary Line  Adjustment.  Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Resolution #10‐2017 to approve the Improvements Agreement  between the City and Chad and Margaret Harris for the Buen Camino Boundary Line Adjustment.    Attachment(s): Improvements Agreement  Copy of Council Resolution #10‐2017  Improvements Agreement with Attachments  Page 204 of 295 CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION #10-2017 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT FOR BUEN CAMINO, A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN THE R-2 AT 459 AND 469 BOWEN CIRCLE WHEREAS, Chad and Margaret Harris, “Owners” of 459 and 469 Bowen Circle, Moab, Utah, applied on February 16, 2015, for the approval of a simple lot line adjustment for the described properties; and WHEREAS, Owners are proposing to construct a single family residence on Lot 1 and a duplex on Lot 2; and WHEREAS, the proposed uses are allowed in the R-2 as listed in Moab Municipal Code (MMC) Chapter 17.45.020, Use Regulations; and WHEREAS, subsequent to review of the proposed boundary line adjustment, the City of Moab Engineering Department determined that there are public improvements that need to be constructed for the project; and WHEREAS, prior to recording the approved plat, the Applicant must execute a Development Improvements Agreement (Agreement) with the City of Moab for the improvements listed in the Agreement; and WHEREAS, Owner furnished cost estimates for required improvements and agrees to construct the improvements as attached to the Development Improvements Agreement as “Required Improvements”. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Moab City Council, with the adoption of Resolution #10- 2017, hereby approves the submitted Development Improvements Agreement (attached) for the Buen Camino Subdivision, and the Council authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreement. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on February 14, 2017. SIGNED: ______________________________ David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Rachel Stenta, Recorder  Page 205 of 295 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT For Buen Camino Subdivision For valuable consideration, the CITY OF MOAB, a Utah municipality (City), and Chad D. Harris and Margaret Harris (Subdivider) referred to as the Parties, enter into the following Subdivision Improvements and Development Agreement (the Agreement), pursuant to Moab Municipal Code (MMC) Sections 16.20.010, to govern the development of the subject property and the installation of subdivision improvements required by City Code. I. RECITALS. a. On January 10, 2017 The City Council approved Resolution No. 02-2017, a resubdivision creating two lots within a lot of the Roufa Subdivision, and it is necessary to enter into this Agreement to confirm the requirements for necessary subdivision improvements. II.AGREEMENT THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1.Covered Property. The recitals above are incorporated into this Agreement. The real property in the County of Grand, State of Utah, subject to this Agreement (the Property) is described in Exhibit 1, attached. 2.Payment of Fees; Approved Land Uses. Subdivider agrees to pay all in-effect City fees applicable to the Subdivision, including but not limited to, impact fees, connection fees, building permit fees, and applicable inspection fees. Applicable fees shall calculated and paid at the time of connection or the time when the service is performed. a). The uses permitted in the Subdivision shall correspond with the uses authorized for the R-2 Zone in Moab Municipal Code Section 17.45. Subject to the conditions in this Agreement, the Property has been authorized for the following uses/activities: Lot 1, 17,538 Square feet; and Lot 2, 8,257 square feet. The configuration of the Subdivision and the uses therein shall conform to the Plat and Construction Plans as set forth in Exhibit 2 to this Agreement. Page 206 of 295 Buen Camino Subdivision SIA Page 2 of 10 3.Required Improvements. Subdivider shall construct all of the improvements on and adjacent to the Property shown on the Plat and Construction Plans as shown in Exhibit 2 (the Required Improvements). Required Improvements shall include the public improvements shown on the Construction Plans, as well as the following: a). Site clearing and removal of obstructions; b). General site grading of the Property; c). Site utilities, including culinary water lines, fire hydrants, and sanitary sewer lines; d). Streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; e). Street striping, signage, and street lights; f). Storm water drainage facilities; g). Non-motorized pathways (if applicable) h). All landscaping, irrigations systems, fencing, or other visual screening required as a condition of approval; i). all electric utility lines, cable television/data, and telephone lines; and j). all incidental improvements necessary or specified for use and occupation of the Subdivision. 4. Improvements to be Completed in Conformance with Construction Plans. All Required Improvements shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner and in conformity with the approved Construction Plans. No deviations from the Construction Plans shall be permitted, except as authorized in writing by the City Engineer upon a showing of good cause. In addition, all Required Improvements shall be completed in conformance with the City of Moab Public Improvement Specifications, building codes, and all state and federal regulations, as applicable. 5. Timeline for Completion. Construction of the Required Improvements shall not commence until the Effective Date of this Agreement. Construction of all Required Improvements shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. a). A reasonable extension of time for the completion of the Required Improvements may be granted, at the discretion of the City Council, upon a showing by the Subdivider that there is good cause for an extension and that the work has been diligently prosecuted from the Effective Date of this Agreement. b). If the construction of the Required Improvements is not completed and accepted within the timelines specified herein, or as lawfully extended, then the Subdivision and all development approvals shall be deemed lapsed and shall have no further effect. Page 207 of 295 Buen Camino Subdivision SIA Page 3 of 10 6. Lot Sales, Building Permits, Plat Recording. No Building Permits will be issued until such time as all of the Required Improvements are completed in accordance with the phasing plan in this Agreement and, with respect to public improvements, accepted by the City, except that building permits may be issued if Subdivider provides a Financial Assurance to the City conforming to Section Eight, below. No final plat for the Subdivision, or any phase thereof, shall be executed by the City or submitted for recording until such time as either: a) all of the Required Improvements are completed in accordance with this Agreement and, with respect to public improvements, accepted by the City; or b) a Financial Assurance conforming to Section Eight is delivered to the City. Subdivider shall not convey or purport to convey any lot within the Subdivision prior to the recording of the final plat. Any purported conveyance of lots by Subdivider prior to approval and recording of a final plat for any phase of the Subdivision, or otherwise in violation of this Agreement, shall be void. 7. Acceptance of Improvements, Warranty. All of the public improvements comprising the Required Improvements shall be subject to quality assurance testing and inspection as specified in the Construction Plans and/or applicable reference standards. Subdivider or its authorized representative shall provide not less than forty (48) hours minimum notification to City when inspection is required. The costs associated with such testing and inspection shall be the responsibility of Subdivider. Any work which is rejected following inspection must be repaired or replaced at the sole cost of the Subdivider. Any work which is covered up prior to inspection may be rejected, in which case Subdivider shall be solely responsible for exposing the work and arranging for inspection. a). The acceptance by the City of the public improvements comprising the Required Improvements following completion and satisfactory inspection shall constitute a dedication and conveyance by the Subdivider to the City of all such improvements. Subdivider shall convey all public improvements to the City free and clear of any mechanic liens, claims, or other encumbrances. b). Subdivider warrants that all public improvements dedicated to the City shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner, in accordance with approved plans and specifications, and that all such improvements shall be free of defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance by the City. Subdivider shall promptly repair or replace any defective work following receipt of written notice under this warranty from the City. c). To partially secure this obligation, Subdivider shall deposit with the City the sum of THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FORTY SIX DOLLARS ($3,246.00), which sum is equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction cost, as determined by the City Engineer, for public improvements Page 208 of 295 Buen Camino Subdivision SIA Page 4 of 10 comprising the Required Improvements (the Warranty Deposit). d). The Warranty Deposit shall be paid by the Subdivider no later than fifteen (15) calendar days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. In the absence of any unperformed warranty claims, the City shall refund the Warranty Deposit to Subdivider upon expiration of the warranty period for the subject improvements. In the event of any default following delivery of written notice to Subdivider with respect to Subdivider’s warranty obligations, the City may elect to draw upon the warranty deposit to cure, in whole or in part, any breach of warranty. e). Subdivider additionally warrants that all public improvements shall be delivered free and clear of any mechanic liens or other encumbrances. The City may require receipt of executed mechanic lien releases as a condition precedent to dedication of the public improvements. 8. Financial Assurance. If the Required Improvements are not completed within the one hundred eighty (180) day deadline specified in this Agreement, or if Subdivider desires to record a final plat or obtain a building permit in advance of the completion of all of the Required Improvements, then the Subdivider may, subject to approval by the City, deliver a Financial Assurance, in a form acceptable to the City for the use and benefit of City and to secure the completion of the Required Improvements. The Financial Assurance shall be in the form of a performance/payment bond, escrow account, letter of credit or other financial instrument approved by the City Attorney in an amount which is not less than one hundred forty percent (140%) of the construction cost set forth in the Plat and Construction Plans of Exhibit 2, and as reviewed and approved by the City Engineer in writing, of the remaining improvements which are not completed. If a Financial Assurance is approved according to this Section Eight, Subdivider shall have up to one hundred eighty (180) additional days from the Effective Date of this Agreement in which to complete the Required Improvements. 9. Cease and Desist Notice. If the Required Improvements have not been completed within the time provided in this Agreement or, in lieu of same, a Financial Assurance approved pursuant to Section Eight, above, then the City may issue an immediate cease and desist order to Subdivider and all work shall be discontinued until such time as an acceptable Financial Assurance has been established. If Subdivider fails to take timely steps to deliver an acceptable Financial Assurance or complete the Required Improvements, then the City may record in the land records an Affidavit of Lapse of Plat/Plan and invoke such other remedies as may be available under this Agreement or at law. 10. Partial Releases of Financial Assurance. Upon partial completion of any class of improvements within the Required Improvements Subdivider may request a partial Page 209 of 295 Buen Camino Subdivision SIA Page 5 of 10 release of the Financial Assurance. The amount of the release shall be equal to the agreed cost of the completed improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. Partial releases shall not be made for partial completion of a class of improvements. a). In order for Subdivider to receive such partial release, the following shall be presented to City: i. A completed Escrow/Financial Assurance Partial Release Form supplied by City and signed by a professional engineer serving as agent for Subdivider; ii. Copies of all quality assurance test results/inspection reports required for the completed improvements; iii. Copies of all weight/quantity tickets for materials incorporated in the work for all items that were estimated on the basis of weight/quantity; and iv. Copies of all invoices or receipts for materials delivered to the site and incorporated in to the work for which a partial release is being requested. b). The partial release request shall be reviewed for completeness and accuracy by City Public Works Director and/or City Engineer. The City may adjust the amount of the request if field inspection shows that quantities are not accurate, or all items of work have not been completed in accordance with the approved Construction Plans. c). City shall process a release request promptly following receipt of a complete application. 11. Final Release of Financial Assurance. If applicable, upon completion of all Required Improvements in accordance with the approved Construction Plans, Subdivider may request that the remainder of the Financial Assurance be released, provided that Subdivider delivers executed mechanic lien waivers/releases from all contractors who performed work on the project and all suppliers who supplied materials that were incorporated into the work, together with a written certification by Subdivider that all outstanding charges for the Required Improvements have been paid and that there are no other liens, encumbrances, or other restrictions affecting the improvements. 12. Use of Financial Assurance upon Default. Upon delivery of written notice to the Subdivider and expiration of any cure period, the City may then elect to draw upon the Financial Assurance as it deems necessary for the completion of improvements or cure of any default under this Agreement. 13. Zoning Compliance. Certificates of Occupancy for structures within the Property shall only be issued upon satisfactory completion and acceptance of all Required Page 210 of 295 Buen Camino Subdivision SIA Page 6 of 10 Improvements as provided in this Agreement. 14. Default, Remedies, Lapse of Plat/Plan. All provisions of this Agreement are material and any violation is grounds for declaration of Default. Prior to invoking any remedies for Default under this Agreement the City shall deliver written notice to the Subdivider describing the act, event, or omission constituting a default, and allowing Subdivider a period of thirty (30) days in which to cure or abate the violation. Cure within that period reinstates this Agreement. a). Upon declaration of default the City may exercise any remedies for violation available under City ordinances or Utah statutes, including, without limitation: i) proceeding against the Financial Assurance; ii). withholding building permits, certificates of occupancy, or certificates of zoning compliance; iii) obtaining an injunction to halt or abate zoning violations or breaches of this Agreement; iv) recording an affidavit of a lapse of plat/plan, in whole or in part; v) commencing an action for damages—including damages for costs incurred in completing, repairing, or replacing Required Improvements or abating any violations; and/or vi) any other remedies available at law or equity, including the remedy of specific performance. The City may combine remedies in its discretion and pursue some or all at different times, as may fit the applicable breach. b). The recording of an affidavit of lapse of plat/plan by the City shall result in the lapse of all prior land use approvals and the voiding of the subdivision of lots within the real property specified in the affidavit. 15. General Provisions. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Subdivider in the ownership or development of all or any portion of the Property. Assignment of this Agreement shall require the mutual approval of the City and the proposed assignee, in writing. a). This Agreement is the product of mutual bargaining. All terms shall be construed in accordance with their plain meaning, regardless of the extent to which either party participated in the drafting. b). Failure of a party to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right, nor shall any course of dealing or previous action or inaction be deemed a waiver of any rights or claims arising with respect to later or subsequent breaches, acts or omissions. c). The term “Agreement” includes this Improvements Agreement, all exhibits hereto, the Final Plat/Plan for the Subdivision, and all phases thereof, and all related design drawings, which documents shall constitute the sole and complete Agreement between the parties. The Agreement shall supersede all prior Agreements or representations, however evidenced. Page 211 of 295 Buen Camino Subdivision SIA Page 7 of 10 No modification to any of the terms of this Agreement shall be binding, unless reduced to writing and lawfully executed by both parties. d). The place of performance of this Agreement is Grand County, Utah. In the event of any legal dispute concerning the subjects of this Agreement, the parties agree that the exclusive venue shall be the Seventh Judicial District Court, Grand County, Utah. In any such proceedings arising under this Agreement, regardless of the denomination of the legal claims, the parties waive trial to a jury on all claims and agree that the action shall be decided by the court sitting without a jury. e). In any legal proceeding arising from this Agreement the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs in addition to any other relief authorized herein. f). This Agreement shall be governed by Utah law. g). This Agreement does not create any third party beneficiary rights. It is specifically understood by the parties that; i. the Project is a private development; ii. the City of Moab has no interest in, responsibilities for, or duty to third parties concerning any improvements to the Property, unless/until the City accepts dedication of public improvements pursuant to this Agreement; and iii. except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall have full power and exclusive control of the Property. h). The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and if any portion should be held to be invalid or unenforceable, then the remainder of this Agreement shall be construed to be in full force without reference to the invalid provision. i). In the event of any legal dispute arising from this Agreement neither party shall be liable to the other for consequential damages, lost profits, or delay related damages of any kind. j). All notices under this Agreement shall be given in writing by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or by hand delivery or delivery by a reputable courier, and sent to the following addresses: To the City of Moab: City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Attn: City Manager Page 212 of 295 Buen Camino Subdivision SIA Page 8 of 10 To Subdivider: Chad Harris and Margaret Harris P.O. Box 301 Moab, UT 84532 Email: cc@msdland.com k). Notice may be delivered to such other parties or addresses as the parties may designate in writing from time to time. A notice sent by mail shall be deemed delivered no later than three (3) days from the date that it is mailed. l). Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to waive any governmental or other immunity to which the City is entitled under law. 16. Indemnity. Subdivider shall indemnify and hold the City harmless with respect to any third party claims, including claims for property damage, injury, or death, and any demands, liabilities, causes of action, costs, or damages, including reasonable attorney’s fees, that may arise from any act or omission of the Subdivider, its members, managers, employees, agents, or contractors in connection with the development of the Subdivision and/or the performance of this Agreement. 17. Future Legislative Power. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to impair or limit the future legislative power or zoning authority of the City. 18. Grading. All grading and soil disturbance undertaken in the development of the Subdivision shall be performed in conformity with Appendix J of the International Building Code (IBC) as adopted by the City. 19. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement is the date when it is signed by all Parties and the Council has approved the final plan for Phases One through Three of the Subdivision. 20. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in separate original counterparts which, when combined, shall constitute the entire Agreement. Exhibits: 1.—Legal Description of the Property 2. – Plat and Construction Plans Page 213 of 295 Buen Camino Subdivision SIA Page 9 of 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the City of Moab, acting by and through the Moab City Council, which has duly authorized execution, and by Subdivider as of the date(s) specified below. CITY OF MOAB: ___________________ Mayor David L. Sakrison Date ATTEST: ___________________ Rachel Stenta Date City Recorder SUBDIVIDER: 3 ___________________ Chad Harris Date _____________________________ ____________________ Margaret Harris Date STATE OF UTAH ) )ss. COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing agreement was executed before me by Chad Harris, this _____ day of ____________, 2017. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ______________________. ______________________________ Notary Public, State of Utah Address: ______________________ Page 214 of 295 Buen Camino Subdivision SIA Page 10 of 10 STATE OF UTAH ) )ss. COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing agreement was executed before me by Margaret Harris, this _____ day of ____________, 2017. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ______________________. ______________________________ Notary Public, State of Utah Address: ______________________ STATE OF UTAH ) )ss. COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing agreement was executed before me by the CITY OF MOAB by and through David Sakrison, this _____ day of ____________, 2017. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ______________________. ______________________________ Notary Public, State of Utah Address: ______________________ Page 215 of 295 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A DESCRIPTION OF LDT 22 OF THE BOWEN PLAT OF NICHOLS-BOWEN SUBDIVISION, SECTION 6, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SE CORNER OF LOT 22 OF THE BOWEN PLAT OF NICHOLS-BOWEN SUBDIVISION, SAID CORNER BEARS N 56 41144 11E 43.01 FT. FROM THE CENTERLINE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEST BOWEN CIRCLE AND NORTH BOWEN CIRCLE, PROCEEDING THENCE N B7 °4610011W 1 65.00 FT. TO THE SW CORNER OF SAID LOT 22, THENCE N 02 °14 100"E 1 60.00 FT. TD THE NW CORNER OF SAID LOT 22, THENCE s B7°4610011E (RECORD=S B7 °24'El 165.00 FT. TO THE NE CORNER OF SAID LOT 22, THENCE S 02°14 'oo"w 160.00 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 0.61 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. CORNERS ARE MONUMENTED AS SPECIFIED ON THE ATTACHED PLAT. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF BOWEN CIRCLE (BEARING=S B7°4610011 E). ____________________________________________________________ Page 216 of 295 EXHIBIT 2 1 of 9EXHIBIT 2Page 217 of 295A FINAL PLAT OF BUEN CAMINO SUBDIVISION: ------ LOT 23 ----- Lor 25 -D D D I{) ~ w D D ,;j" ~ 0 N D z I I I s s7°45'00'/E 82.50' A SUBD I VIS I ON OF A S U BDIVISION OF LOT 22 OF THE BOWEN PLAT OF NICHOLS-BOWEN SUBDIV I S I ON 469 B O W EN C I RCLE SECTION 6, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLB&M, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH Lor 23 CREC=s 87°241E J 1 6 5.00 ' B2.SO' I I I I Lor 22 -------- ---- I I I I _,_ la F'T. WIDE PUBLIC UTIUTY.loRAINAGE & IRRIGATION EASEMENT ,------------------i ------------------- 1 I I I ~I w1 ~I '° I j I ZI E:' I ~I "! I "'I Ir -, <a I ~I " I ~, <( "'' ~I >-I I-:; I ;:: I ::, I " I .J ID I ii' I wl <:' I 31 t I o l -I I I I I LDT 1 "' "' " "' w D D -.. -0 N D z 17,538 SQ. FT. 1459 BOWEN CIRCLE) 105.00' Ns 7-45·oo "w Lor 24 LOT 2 B,257 SQ. FT. (469 BOWEN CIRCLE) w .J D Ir D z w "' " " "' w D D -.. -0 N D z 25.0Q' L =29.38 R =38.50 ;":::~..::aa=s_o_•- 1),,'• -')q. J ROAD DEDICATION PARCEL · 600 SQ. FT. 60.00' 1 65.0 0 -~/ ,.;~/' o~o' ,,.,.,,')_ /' ~ -,,, N -D D D I{) ~ ~ D D ,;j" ~ 0 N D en LOT 20 SE CORNER LDT 22 OF BOWEN SUBDIVISION -----NORTH R -O ·W BOWEN CIRCLE -- D Ol ' D -0 Ol SCALE: 1 "=20' (24" X 35" ONLY) LOCATED IN THE NE 1 /4 OF SEC 6, T26S, R22E, SLB&M. CENTER ST. ~ I I I I I z --+1 «-:r TH I S PLAT • " .. 1-.. ;;; D D " LEGEND -0 v ~ CENTERLINE MONUMENT (SPIKE) 4llll1IIJIDnnn. NOAIH V I C I NITY MAP SCALE : NONE MOAB , UTAH • 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP SET BY THIS SURVE BASIS OF BEARINGS NB7°45 'oo"w I I I I I I I 3 25' B01"£JV ------------r- NOTES: 1 . MOAB CITY ZONING R-2 RESIDENTIAL ZONE. 2. LOCATION OF' EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER SUPPLY ANO SEWER SYSTEM TO BE LOCATED BY BLUE STAKES ANO PROPOSED HOOK-UPS TO BE ARANGEO WITH INDIVIDUAL UTILITY PROVIDERS . 3. PROPOSED LOTS CREATED FROM THIS SUBDIVISION AMENDMENT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF' THE CITY'S STORM DRAINAGE ORDINANCE. 4. PROPOSED LOTS CREATED FROM THIS SUBDIVISION AMENDMENT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF' THE crrv's FIRE PROTECTION ORDINANCE. 5. l O FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY, DRAINAGE & IRRIGATION EASEMENT ALONG THE WEST ANO NORTH PROPERTY LINES AS RECORDED IN ENTRY No. 498855, BOOK : 775 PAGE : 423 WITH GRAND COUNTY RECORDER'S OF'FICE. 6. 600 SQ. FT. ROAD DEDICATION PARCEL AS RECORDED IN ENTRY No . 490855 , BOOK:775 PAGE : 423 WITH THE GRAND COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE. D ID 3 D ' Ir I-.. w 3 ~/~ ~,"4 ~ \..l ~11:1:; ~ ...... \..l C / /? C £ £ MAYORS APP ROVA L: PRESENTED TO THE MOAB CITY MAYOR THIS AY OF, ___ A.O. 20~ SUBDIVISION WAS ACCEPTED AND APPROVED. ATTEST ___________ _ C OUNTY R EC O RDER No.: STATE OF" UTAH, Co. OF" GRAND, RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF" : DATE: TIME: 8001,c: PAGE: FEE: RECORDER: JOH':" ~~~N CORTEZ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: I , BRANDON E. ANDERSON, PROFESSIONAL LANO SURVEYOR NUMBER 493871 6, HOLD A LICENSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 58, CHAPTER 22, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ANO LANO SURVEYORS LICENSING ACT ANO HAVE COMPLETED A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1 7-23-1 7 ANO HEREBY CERTIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS ANO DESCRIPTIONS ARE CORRECT. MONUMENTS WILL BE SET AS REPRESENTED ON THIS PLAT I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT BY AUTHORITY OF THE HEREON OWNERS, I HAVE MADE A SURVEY OF THE TRACT OF LANO SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ANO HAVE SUBDIVIDED THE SAME TRACT INTO LOTS TO BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AS: BUEN CAMINO S U BDIV I S I ON THAT THE SAME HAS BEEN CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND POINTS ESTABLISHED ON THE GROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEREON LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ~ DATE: B-24-1 6 ~c: -). \_ '- BRANDON E. ANDERSON CERTlF'ICATE No. 493871 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A DESCR I PT I ON OF LOT 22 OF THE BOWEN PLAT OF NICHOLS -BOWEN SUBDIVISION, SECTION 6, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCR I BED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SE CORNER OF LDT 22 OF THE BOWEN PLAT OF NICHOLS-BOWEN SUBDIVIS I ON, SAID CORNER BEARS N 56°41'44"E 43.01 FT. FROM THE CENTERL I NE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTI ON OF WEST BOWEN CIRCLE AND NORTH BOWEN CIRCLE, PROCEEDING THENCE N 87°46'oo"w 1 65.00 FT. TD THE SW CORNER O F SAID LOT 22, THENCE N 02°1 4 10011 E 1 60.00 FT. TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID LOT 22, THENCE S B7°46100 11 E (RECDRD=S 87°24'E) 165.00 FT. TO THE NE CORNER OF SAID LDT 22, THENCE S 02°1 4 10011 W 1 60.00 FT. TO T HE P O I NT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 0.61 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. CORNERS ARE MONUMENTED AS SPECIFIED ON THE ATTACHED PLAT. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF BOWEN CIRCLE IBEAR I NG =s B7°46'oo"E>. ROSENBERG A s s 0 C I A T E s CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS 352 EAST RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE A·2,ST. GEORGE, UTAH 84790 PH (435) 673-9585 F'x (435) 673·8397 • www.RACIVIL.COM OWNER'S DEDICATION: KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER(S) OF' THE ABOVE DESCR I BED TRACT OF LAND, HAVING CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND STREETS HEREAFTER TO BE KNOWN AS THE B UE N C AMINO S UBDIVISION 00 HEREBY DEDICATE F'OR PERPETUAL USE OF' THE PUBLIC ALL PARCELS OF' LANO SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS INTENDED F'OR PUBLIC USE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANO THIS DA)f OF' A. 0 . . 1j ·c ,i:!, ,l.......~ CHADD. H AR4 m1.."f"'C 111 MARGARET HARRIS ACKNOWLEDGMENT: STATE OF COUNTY OF ON THE ) § ) DAY OF , PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME , WHO DULY ACKNOWLEDGED TD ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC RESIDING IN I I RECElVE;,_ · AUG 2 6 1016 / BY: 9"' 3 '~1"'1' EXHIBIT 2 2 of 9Page 218 of 295I 2. 3 4. s •• 1. •• q 10. II. 12. 13. 14 15. -~ GENERAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETIN6 HITH THE MOAB CITY ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) El/S!NESS DAYS IN ADVANGE OF ANY CLEARING, 6RUBBIN6 AND/OR CONSTRUCTION HORK ON THE SJTE. NO ),,!ORK ON THE SITE OR HITHJN THE CITY Rl6HT--OF-WAY HILL BE PfRM!nED UNTIL A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETIN6 IS HELD. ALL IN5PEGTION5 MIJST BE COORDINATED HI MOAB CITY ENGIN EER J.-.IJTH A MINIMUM NOTICE OF ONE R!LL BIJSINESS DAY OR 24 HOURS REGllJIRED. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALI6NMENT, CENTERLINE AND ALL APP LICABLE DATA FROM THESE AND OTHER EN6INEfRIN6 [)RAv,[]N6S BEFORE CONSTRUCTION . CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSJBLE FOR THE COORD!NATION AND COST OF PRO\/!D IN6 ALL CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSJBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSrXIATED WITH MATERIALS Tf5TIN6. Tf5TJN6 A6ENGY SHALL BE AN JNDEPENDENT A6ENGY APPROVED BY THE MOAB CITY FIBLIG WORKS DEPARTMENT. ALL TREES, BRJJSH, 5TUMP5 AND ROOTS ARE TO BE REMOVED TO A DEPTH OF NO LESS THAN THREE (3) FEET BELOH SUB6RADE. ALL VEGETATIVE GOYER REMOVED DlJRlNG CONSTRUGTION SHALL BE DISPOSED OFFSITE AT A LANDFILL . THE TYPE, SIZE, LOGA TION AND NUMBER OF ALL KNOWN IJNDER6ROUND UTI LlTlfS ARE APPROXIMATE HHEN SHOWN ON THE DRAV'l!N65. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONS IBJLJTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THEIR EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDER6ROJND LITILmES ALON& THE ROIJTE OF THE v()RK BEFORE COMM!:NGIN6 NEW CONSTRUCTION . THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSJBLE FOR UNKNOWN UNDER&RCWD UTILlTlfS. ALL CONSTRUCTION HlTHIN THE PUBLIC. Rl6HT OF V'lAY, MATERIALS, TE5TIN6, AND GUALITY OF WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARD SPEGIF!GATIONS OF JvkJAB GJTY, AS APPL ICABLE . ALL UTILITY INSTALLATIONS TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE V'!ITH THE MOAB CITY DESieN STANDARDS AND PUBLIC. IMPROVEMENT SPEGIFIC.ATIONS (MOST CURRENT VERS ION), AS APPLICABLE. ALL V'lATER AND SEHER LJNES MUST BE TESTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PAVJN6. ALL V'lATERLINE INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPEGJF IGATIONS OF MOAB CITY, AND l!TAH STATE. ALL SEHER LINES SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPEC.IF!GATIONS OF MOAB GITY, AND l!TAH STATE. ALL EXISTIN6 SITE IMPRO\/l:'MENTS INGLlJDIN6 LANDSGAPIN6 WHICH ARE DAMA6ED DUE TO CONSTRUGTION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE REPAIRED/REPLACED PRIOR TO AGGEPTANCE OF COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS. ALL TRAFFIC. CONTROL DEYIGES AND Sl6NS MUST BE IN CONFORMANCE V'!ITH THE MANJAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC. CONTROL DEVIGES (2003). ALL STREET CONSTRUCTION MJST CONFORM TO JvkJAB GITY STANDARDS AND SPEG1FIGATIONS CURRENT AT DATE OF EXEaJTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT A6REEMENT PERTAININ6 TO THIS DEVELOPMENT. WHEN AN EXISTIN6 STREET MUST BE aJT, THE STREET MJST BE RESTORED TO A COND ITION EGUAL TO OR BETTER THAN ITS ORl61NAL CONDmoN. PATC.HIN6 SHALL BE DONE IN CONFORMANCE V'!ITH MOAB CITY STANDARDS AND PUBLIC. IMPROVEMENT SPEG IF!G ATIONS (MOST GURR.ENT VERS!ON). THE FINISHED PATCH SHALL BLEND SMOOTHLY IN TO THE EXISTIN6 SURFACE. ALL LAR6E PATCHES SHALL BE RESTORED TO PRE -EXISTIN6 CONDITIONS . PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT FALL WITHIN A PUB LIC. Rl6HT-OF -V'lAY, THE GONTRAGTOR SHALL BE RESPONSJBLE FOR NOTIFYIN6 THE APPROPRIATE FUBLJG ENTITY AND OBTAININ6 ENCROACHMENT PERMITS IF REGUJRED. ALL MOAB GITY DES16N STANDARDS SHALL APPLY AS APPL!GABLE . GLARIF IGATION DUE TO CONFL!GT SHALL BE MADE BY THE PROJEGT EN61NEER AN/OR THE C.JTY EN6INEER5 AS APPL!GABLE. ioT z3 ioT z5 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BUEN CAMINO SUBDIVISION: PLANS OF PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER 459 BOWEN CIRCLE SECTION 5, T 25 5, R 22 E, SLB&M, MOAB CITY , GRAND COUNTY, UTAH ior z3 ioT ZZ ----~-;--------~+~--- I I ---'- -~ -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .... LOT 1 l1,q32 SQ. FT. 45q BONEN CIRCLE LOT 2 6,624 SQ. FT. IN BODY OF LOT 1,B65 SQ. FT. TOTAL LOT AREA 4t,q BONEN CIRCLE .... ............... .... .... I I I I I I EXISTIN6 GURB i r . 6VT1ER TO NEW ASPHALT BE REMOVED ... I I I I I I I I I I I I ioT zo NEW LOCAT ION OF Ll6HT/POHER PO LE 1---I_ ------ EXIS TlN6 LI6HT /POWER POLE TO BE RELOGA TED EXIS ll»S GURB r t 6UTfER ;:;~ \ J~~ '\k/~~~~ -.~.=-·-:= ~z tr=-~ .. m,,,,,.,~ ~. -d ::_ _;'2"~ · ioT Z4 20 ' 40 ' I ::J I I SCALE : 1"=20 ' -- ' ' ~ET,.,EEN EXITI~~D!FIED CURB CURB TO NEH NEW aJRB ! 6lJTTE 111 It R ------------i--•Ji. ~"' ,,1 I'/ so I I TRANsmoN BE-MIN I I EXITIN& TWEEN Cd-~~ ' -~ '~ :x-17""~~~ SAHCUT --/ ---I EX I MATGH {J --_ _, 1 ~ -_,_.,-_ --__ j I ASPHALT '.)< y -~ ~ _ ' ,, , ~~-·" - 11 h c.l --_Jc ~ = ' ' ---. - :)~ y"~· '. : -· r 1 .. , A 1 . . , I (@ClC- Q,; ~ ~~ ~q~ffe I Know what's below. Call before you dig. NO TICE, EXISTIN 6 UTILITIES ARE S HOH N O N P L ANS F O R THE CONVENIENCE OF TI-IE CONTRAC TOR O NLY. THE CONTR ACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATIO N AND PROTE C TION OF ALL 1JTIUTIES THE ENGINEER B EARS NO R E SPONSIBILI TY F OR UTILITIES NO T SHOH N OR SHOHN INCORRECTl.. Y. ~" t--, CEH~,ST. §-; ~ ~ I I I I .~ PROJECT (""-ttj ~ '1, ' \l VfCfHf7'Y HAP SITE LEGEND -- ~-~~~~~~ K.h&~~.'J I ----;;---b,--b-~ I I b • . L. 4· o. L C • • L'::: -• ---.. __ _J [' • • • ', ' , . : I PROPERTY LINE EXIS TlN6 EASEMENT PROPOSED SAH aJT EX!STIN6 aJRB 4 6UTTER MODifIED aJRB 4 6UTTER EXISTIN6 ASPHALT PROPOSED ASPHALT EXISTIN6 GONGRETE PROPOSED GONGRETE EXISTIN6 ASPHALT TO BE SAHGUT, REMOVED, AND REPLA.GED NITH NEW ASPHALT EXIS TlN6 aJR8 ~ 6UTIER TO BE REMOVED ~ REPLACED V'!ITH NEV'! ASPHALT SHEET IND EX I COVER SHEET HG-0 HORIZONTAL CONTROL SHEET TS-C, DETAILS PR-01 PLAN t PROFILE SHEET 6R-O 6RAD JN6 SHEET UT--01 UTILITY PLAN VT-02 UTILITY PLAN DETA ILS NOTES I. MOAB GlTY ZONIN6 R-2 RESIDENTIAL ZONE . 2 . PROPOSED LOTS CREATED FROM THE 5UBD1V!SION AMENDMENT SHALL MEET THE REGUJREMENTS OF THE GJTYS STORM DRAINA6E ORDINANCE . .?. PROPOSED LOTS CREATED FROM THE 51.iBDIV!SION AMENDMENT SHALL MEET THE REGUJREMENTS OF THE CITY'S FIRE PROTECTION ORD INANCE . 4 . 10 FOOT V'!IDE FUBL!G UTILI TY, DRAINA6E 4 1RRl6ATION EASEMENT ALON6 THE WEST AND NORTH PROPERTY LINES AS REGORDED IN ENTRY #4'18855, BOOK : TI5 PA6E : 423 WITH THE 6RAND GOUNTY REGOR.DER'S OFF IGE. 5 . bOO SGI. FT . ROAD DED!GATION PAR.GEL AS RECORDED IN ENTRY #4'18855, BOOK , TI5 PA6E. 423 WITH THE 6RAND COJNTY RECORDER 'S OFF!GE . DATE: 10/01/16 JOB NO.: Kq538-15 DESIGN ED BY: BDH CHECKED BY: RAR DWG: KCJ538 CONST. ~ 11 I w ~ > w z ~ 0 ~ 5 w ~ ~= ~ cc 0 >-w > cc ~f-, ::, ~ i:o < 0 z <: z: ~ • ~ ~o cc w w C/) z - CJ o: z w ~ ~< - > - u Q ~ 352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George , Utah 84790 Ph (43 5) 673-858 6 Fx (43 5) 673 -83 97 www.racivil.com ~ z 0 > i::i... ....... ~ Q E-< i:Q ::l ~ ~~:;! -Cl':l O !3 ffi~~~i :I: ....... 0:, :a: r.r; ~ § ~ ~ > 0 u c5 ffi ~ i:Q OF7fo&i 0000 0 "' No. 189 i ~ 0 "' t'l O ROBER T A. g Z Z \ REID j t; \ 0 00 ,,B-~ -/J,,o° if "°R 0 0 0 0 0000° v Ofi'Essl o~ ~ SHEET 1 I OF i SHEETS EXHIBIT 2 3 of 9Page 219 of 295-0 "' • 0 0 N ~ SCALE: 1 "=20' (24" X 35" ONLY) LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 6, T26S, R22E, SLB&M. -0 ,t zJ z5 -- () Q () "' !lJ B '-t- 0 8 z SUNDI AL GARDEN S UB D . ior zs I I ior zz I S81'46'00"E (REC =S 81'24'E) 165 .00' 8250' 8250' ro FT. HIDE PIJBLJG UTILITY, DRA1NAe f: IRRIGATION EASEMENT I _/_~ --------------1------------------1 I --------I I I I I I I I I ~1 ~I :ls I ;ti I zl 81 ~I ~I -1 ~ \Jj I ., I ;,; I gl ~-I -I d s l )l I fil I o' I ~I . I Ii: I QI I I I I LOT 1 17,538 SQ . FT. ( 4 5 q BO HEN C IRCLE) 105.00' ~ ,; 1 ~ N81'46'00"H ior Z4 LOT 2 8,257 SQ . FT . ( 4 b q BOHEN C I R C LE) ~B•,2-,~~ ..._<_ro!'/ ~ ! f ~ ~ ~9'6, "-"' 38'.5 0 ,, ' ,y ~ !LI ll 'if: ~ v/ ROAD DEDIGA TION PARCEL -600 SQ. FT. 60.00' 25.00' L=2<t38 R=:3850 165.00' / 25' . ~y .~ d #'/of,. / r-- ~lt..q t..q "'l ~ \,,) <;::)I ~ ', ~I\,,) n () () c:i "' ior zo ~ () 0 '-t- 0 ~ CK SE CORNER LOT 22 OF BOHEN SUBDIVISION ~--~ -NORTH R-0-r! BOV>IEN GIRGLE BOH'EJV C//?CLg ~ • BASIS OF BEAR1N6S N81"46'00'H LEGEND GENT.ERLINE MONUMENT (SPI KE) 5/8 " REBAR HITH PLASTIC GAP SET BY THIS SURVEYOR y1----1 l:,q i s:l ~ IJ ~ ~I ~ .. DATE: /0/0)/16 JOB NO.: KCf538-/5 DESIGNED BY: BDH CHEC KED BY: RAR DWG: KCf538 CONST. ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~=! ~ F-< ~ ~<; ,_. ~ Zu; ~o w w z C/) VJ - CJ z OV) ~ ~< ~ 352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George , Utah 84790 Ph (435) 673 -8586 Fx (435) 673 -8397 www.racivil.com ....:i 0 0:::: ~ z 0 > ....... Q i:Q ::l ~ ~ :;! .....:i~[/)~!3 ~ ... o~ ~ Z Zoo ....... 0:, :a: 0 u 0 ::E ~ N ,<i:: ....... u 0:::: z 0 ~ ::c: ~ i:Q SHEET HC-01 2 OF i SHEETS EXHIBIT 2 4 of 9Page 220 of 295CL 2s.001 2s.001 ROW ROW , a.00 1 ± 1 a.001 ± LANE LANE EX. ROLLED CURB & GUTTER ___ ------,------------------------->-\ -\-E X-G ROUND EX. PAVEMENT .\ ~ D l/1 l/1 . N 1.0%v-,, ~ \ 1JI _ _,," \ MODIFIED CURB & GUTTER / \ EXISTING SECTION BOWEN CIR. CL VARIES I ROW I VARIES LANE :;t PER MOAB CITY STANDARDS / \\ PAVEMENT I \ I \ I \ I -------------\ / '-\ I / ' PROPOSED SECTION I / '\ :// '\ STA. BOWEN CIR. 1 +oo.oo -2+26.72 / \ 4 11 ASPHALT (2 -2 11 LIFTS ) I \ : b)f;k-1C/n~=bl;::Z0~n \ y / I " 6" (MINI \ / B SUBGRADE \ I ' / ' / ' / ' / -/ ---------- 18.001 ± LANE J 2s.001 ROW E X . ROLLED CURB & GUTTER .;i--,---- \__ EX. GROUND E X . ROLLED CURB & GUTTER 1 2 11 6 11 {MIN) 4 " B " 6 11 IMIN) 4.511 f--- ' • I VJ I //'! ~I I I ~ I ~ I // I ~ I -\I I ~, "'°' ~ 0ua(-/,AUo~ nfl ~o )~ ,\ 6" 21-0 11 30" ROLLED CURB AND GUTTER 1 2 11 1 1-6 11 ~ l I l 1 .511 ~~~ MODIFIED CURB AND GUTTER SUBDIVISION STREETS ONLY ,211 7" L3 11 ,411 7 " L 1 11 GENERAL NOTES: 1 . CONCRETE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MOAB CITY STANDARD CONCRETE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. PLACE EXPANSION-CONTRACTION JOINTS , JOINT FILLER MATERIAL FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE PLUS 1 INCH, FLUSH WITH TOP OF CONCRETE) E V ERY SD FEET FOR HAND SET FORMING AND EVERY 1 50 FEET FOR SLIP FORMING. 3. PLACE CONTROL JOINTS AT 1 0 FOOT INTERVALS (MAXIMUM). 4. ROLLED CURB & GUTTER, AND MODIFIED CURB & GUTTER SHALL NOT BE USED FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY THE MOAB CITY ENGINEER, THE USE OF THESE CURB AND GUTTER TYPES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE CLEAR ZONE REc;JUIREMENTS DETAILED IN THE A.A.S.H.T.O. ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE. 5. SIZING OF CONCRETE WATERWAYS FOR DEV ELOPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE MOAB CITY CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. EDGE CONCRETE WITH A 1/211 EDGING TOOL 7. USE 6 11 MIN UNTREATED BASE COURSE MATERIAL. COMPACT TO 95% OF MAX IMUM DRY DENSITY. {AASHTO T-99) 8. STAGGER LAP SPLICES WITH A MINIMUM OF 30 BAR DIAMETER LAPS . 9. FORM OIL CONTAMINATED REINFORCING STEEL WILL BE REJECTED. .. 11 DATE : /0/0)/16 JOB NO.: KCf538-/5 DESIG NED BY: BDH CHEC KED BY: RAR DWG: KCf538 CONST. ~ ~ z 0 ~ w ~ ~= ~ cc 0 >-w > cc ~f-, ::, ~ i:o < 0 z <: z: ~ • ~ ~o cc w w C/) z - CJ o: z w ~ ~< - > - u Q ~ 352 East Riversid e Driv e, Su ite A-2 St. Ge orge , Utah 84790 Ph (435) 673 -8586 Fx (435) 67 3-8397 www.racivil.co m z 0 -> -Q C/'J i:Q ::l d ~~:;! ~ 0,: C/'J u !3 E-< ~Oifi · ~ z~ ~ Q -iil ~ ::E I,) c5 " z ~ ~ i:Q OF7fo&i 0000 " "' No. 189 i ~ 0 "' t'l O ROBER T A. g Z Z \ REI D j t; \ 0 00 ,,B-~ -/J,,o° if ,.oR 0 0 0 0 0000° v 0/i'.essl o~ ~ SHEET TS-01 3 OF i SHEETS EXHIBIT 2 5 of 9Page 221 of 2951.00% 1.00% El •" -0 0 I cJ J ~QAa3<1qq 01 f6a3qqq.4q ~--,.--TIJC~q~---~ -r---.._ ,, ~ ... ,/ vQ• FG=3'l'l'l.31~ \-------.. TBG POC=3'l'l'l.21_/./ --·e.~ v--, -~ -I ; A2qo3• R33.50 ' p4q•3B '55" ~ -,' I __ J):_ ___ PT/PCa3qqq,66 ~,, ADJJST MH LID I RIN6 ,-_;:--==--~~~=--~=-A3q_12· R25DO' D'l1"02'20" EOA 0 3qqB.BB I I I I I f6a3qqq _l6 ----AB.32'/ RIOOO' 041°40'04" BON;f'T a 3<1qq .B4 TBG PTasqqq 14 I --........ ----MA.JCH / T13Ga3<1qq q3 / MATCH / ____ _ 0 -0 N ELEVATION TO MATCH TOA / ~,...., EOA::3<:J<'=!'l3 ,...., 6RADIN6 TO ENCROACH ON LOT 24 _ 2 y /. '1)5 c-201% CONTRACTOR JS RESPONSIBLE FOR TIJC PC-3'1qqo //" ~~ () EX!STJN~- REPA!RIN6 ANY CONCRETE, 1 ;~ 0 ~ / fLa3qqq,6~-----4--=..L---=--~=r ~=~=-,,-/ 1------'-·---'----'--.--r-- MATCH / / --EOAaSqqq.45 SCALE: 1 "= 1 D' (2411 X 36' ONLY) r 24 LANSDCAPIN6 ETC. TO f6a3<1qqJ2 -I ~ , 1; t)O'e'-"$'() cs, PRECONSTRUCTION OUALTITY . -'""" 6 J / / O· {>0 '-8 // EOA-Joov . ~v \ <:, / / / r~ "'1'1) ~~~ EOA}lqq,6l / 5 '-0 " MIN TRANS!T!ON BETWEEN EXITIN6 ROLLED CURB TO NEH MODIFJED CURB LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE EX. EASEMENT EX. ASPHALT E X. CURB & GUTTER CENTER LINE EX. SEWER LINE PR. SLOPE & DIRECTION E X . SLOPE & DIRECTION EX. SEWER MANHOLE EX . LIGHT POLE GENERAL CONCRETE AND PAVEMENT NOTES 1. PORTLAND CEMENT SHALL BE TYPE O OR OJ , LOW ALKAL I AND MEET ASTM-G-150 . 2. ALL CONCRETE 1/SED FOR EXTERIOR FLAT WORK AND CURB 4 61.JTTER SHALL HAVE MIN 3500 PS I 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STREN6TH WI 4% TO 8% ENTRA!NfD AIR 3. 4. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACE AT A MAXIHUM SLUMP OF 4 lN (4 "). IF 6REATER J.-.IORKABJL ITY 15 DESJRED A WATER-REDUCIN6 ADMJXlVRE SHOULD BE USED . 5. b. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE TREATED V'!ITH A SYNTHETIC. MEMBR.A.NE TYPE C.URIN6 COMPOJND IMMEDIATELY AFTER FIN!SHIN6. 1. SAJ.-.JG.IJT CONTROL JOIN TS SHALL BE PER MOAB DE516N STANDARDS AND SHALL BE SPACED AGc.ORDIN6 TO THE FOLLOV'!IN6 SGHEDULE . SIDEWALKS -10' O.C EACH WAY OJRB 4 6UTTER -10" b. 6ROOVED CONTROL JOlNTS SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL FORMED CONCRETE AT TIME OF POUR . 6ROOVE5 SHALL BE AT LEAST I" DEEP AND SHALL BE SPACED AGc.ORDIN6 TO THE FOLLOW ING SGHEDIJLE, 4 " SIDEWALK SLAB -b " O.C. CURB AND 6UTTER - 10 " Qt:,. ON STRAI&HT RIJNS t 4" Qt:,. AROIJND CURVES . <1. ISOLATION/EXPANS ION JOINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MOAB CITY DESIGN STANDARDS . SAID JOINTS SHALL BE OF Y.z " THICK EXPANSION MATERJAL PER AASHT0-33 . ,o ALL EXTERIOR CONCRETE SHALL BE FINISHED V'!ITH A U&HT BROOM FINISH . ' I ~ . t d TBG=3'l'1B .'l3 I I : I I f6a3'1qqo3 , I I EOA 0 3'1qB,5B I J ,,,, ~-., V '/o,.'')I\ 1 :f" ~\+:'(---- 1.28% v,, J!-· ;,f <n_; :,: ~ "' w +-"'~--- / / "-. "-. "-. "-. / / " " / 5 '-0 " MIN TRANS!T!ON BETWEEN EX!T!N6 ROLLED CURB TO NEW MODJF JED CURB \ i 1 -~ ~ § "' 11 x 111 w MATCH~ I.__ ' I / / 1111 -iR c:si~ "" "''~ \ /' / t£ ~ i ~ ~ ~ <,i I N N w ' () rt ,JO -"-. -0 0-.· 0-.· -- ·9; ~ ~ -- ~ieii I ,' \._ /~ ~" _ _ ~--~ , MATCH ,.p-'O + t,,.· _ _..:" _ __=_ --'S..=>. b. . i:>_ -L----~ _ - - / / - TI3Ca3qqe_14 . ) MATCH _/,,, FL 0 3qqB36 / MATCH EOA 0 3'1qB.3J I 4000 3qqq ~- ;, ;': "' >< g: w rn 2 ". <w :,: uJ PROP . FL r_/ 3qqe, 3qq7 () 't ,I < ~ "' 1/1 I : "' "' 1 / 1 L4 1 "' I I \ /c. I "' 'IP' I 1 IJ \ ' C 1' "' 'I' ./ I "' I I \ '7 I 11 I " -~ ~ ~ -ir--- E6 _/ Cl '\' o.qq% ......_ --- -, / / / / ~ N ~ w "' ~ ~ i " ~ 4000 --- 3qqq 3qqe, 3qq7 II II DATE: /0/0)/16 JOB NO.: KCf538-/5 DESIGNED BY: BDH CHEC KED BY: RAR DWG: KCf538 CONST. ~ ~ ~ ~=! ~ f-, ; ~<; z:1: ~o C/) cc w w z CJ 0 Cl) :'; Cl) _; ~< ~ 352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790 Ph (435) 673 -8586 Fx (435) 673 -8397 www.racivil.com z 0 -> -Q VJ i:Q ::l ~ ~~:;! d VJO !:; ~ ~o~ ~ ~ ~iil~ ~ ~§ c5 z ~ ~ i:Q SHEET PR-01 4 OF 1 SHEETS EXHIBIT 2 6 of 9Page 222 of 295I. 2 3. 4. 5 6 1 0 -0 0 - SCALE: 1 "= 1 01 !24" X :36" ONLY) GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 0 N CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAININ6 AN EXCAVATION PERMIT FROM MOAB G!TY EN6INEER PRIOR TO GOMMENGIN6 GONSTRUGTION AGTlVITIES ALSO, BLUE STAKES SHALL BE NOTlf!ED PRIOR TO ANY EXGAVATION AGTMT(. STATE AND LOCAL RE6ULATIONS PROHIBIT FU6ITIVE DIJST FROM EXITIN6 SITE AS A RfSULT OF GONSTROCTION AGTMTIES IN ORDER TO CONTROL FIJE;ffiVE DIJST, THE FOLLOWIN6 GONSTRUGTION PRAGTJG.ES SHALL BE FOLLOY'IED, LIMIT THE A1"10IJNT Of D15TIJRBED AREAS ACTIVELY BEING WORKED, DO NOT ENGA6E IN GRADIN6 AGTMTIES ON WJNDY DAYS, lJSE WATER TO WET DOWN DISTIJRBED AREAS FREGIUENTLY, MOISTURE GONDmON ALL FILL MATERIAL PRlOR TO PLAGIN6 AND PLACE IN COMPACTED LIFTS NOT EXGEEDIN6 6 " IN THICKNESS, ESTABLISH VEGETATION ON FRESHLY GRADED SURFACES AS SOON AS PRAGTIGALLY POSSIBLE. ON-SITE BORROV'I MATERIAL MAY BE USED AS FILL TO ACHIEVE THE 5UB6RADE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE MATERJAL SHALL BE FREE OF OR6ANJG MATER!AL AND ROGKS LAR6ER THAN 6" IN DIAMETER, AND SHALL BE PLACED IN 6" MAX LOOSE LIFTS, 1'10ISTIJRE WNDITIONS TO ±3% OF OPTIMUM, AND WMPAGTI:D TO THE FOL.LOWIN& SPEC IFICAT ION (AS DETI:RMINED BY STD PROGTOR ASTM D--h'IB), 3.1 FILL lJNDER PAVEMENT, STRUCTIJRES AND ALL Rl6HT OF ~y (ROv,J) -AT LEAST '15% OF MDD. 3.2 FILL lJNDER LAND=CAPED AREAS -AT LEAST '!2% OF M.DD. ALL FILL MATI:RIAL PLACED ON THE SITE SHALL BE FIELD TESTI:D FOR WMPLIANGE i,./ITH THE WMPAGTION CRITERIA. EACH LIFT SHALL BE TESTED AT 1 TEST PER 1,000 SQ FT FOR AREAS lJNDER STRUC,lURES, 1 TEST PER EVERY 1.000 LIN FEET FOR AREAS WITHIN THE RI6HT Of ~Y, AND I TEST PER 2.000 SQ FT FOR LAND=CAPED AREAS. THE TESTIN6 SHALL BE ARRAN6ED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND WNDIJGTED AT THE CONTRACTOR$ EXPENSE. HOV'IEYER THE WNTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATIN6 THE 5CHEDULIN6 Of THE TESTIN&. PRIOR TO THE PLAGEMENT OF ANY FILL THE AREA TO REGEIYE FILL SHALL BE STR IPPED OF ALL VE6ETATION AND ROOTS TO A MIN DEPTH OF 6 INGHES. THE AREA SHAL L THEN BE SCARIFJED TO A DEPTH OF B INGHES, MOJSll.JRE CONDITIONED AND COMPAGTED. ANY EXISTIN6 FJL.l MATERIALS ENGOI.INTERED DLIRIN6 EXCAVATION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM AREAS PLANNED FOR 9..IPPORT OF SrnJCTl.lRAL COMPONENTS. FINAL YARD 6RADIN6 TO MAINTAIN EXISTIN6 6RADIN6 TOP06RAPHY ! VE6ETATION TO EXTENT P0551BLE. '1 f6c3qqq.4q ~ ,,------... ----------,. ..... IB<>f'T/PC•3'1qq .3q ,•• ,, '::,__ ........ -,, -c_· .,;s: / ~ a( FG=3'1'i'i.31~ \-~ Tf3C. poe,::3qqq.21-/_.l . . e.ii5M ./ I o I 6 I I I I 1 ~OAa3qqq.Q1 ; I A2q.03' R33.50' D4'1°38 '55" I I I I I I I I F6•3q~q .16 AB.32'~ RI0.00' D41°4 1 '04" BON;f'T•~qqJ;4 I TllC PT•3qqq.14 MAJCH ---A3'1.12' , 1 V _____-__-/ TB(,a~qq.q3 ·4 R25.00' / ~ -----------_I\ ....------- Dql'02'20" EOA•~qBbB / ( -_ ~~PT/PC•~qqh6 -.. •• •• ........ •• •• •• / MATCH FL•3qqqho ADJJST MH LID I RIN6 - --==--~ ~ ~ = --;;z---,~ ELEVATION TO MATCH TOA / 1 / ,,/,...., __..---,.------ , ______ -=-------=---- EOA•3qq9!' / ;,-- 6RAD1N6 TO ENCROACH ON LOT 24 _ / / Y / / CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IBC PC-3qqq.02 , //, , REPAIRIN6 ANY CONCRETE, , //~ LANSDCAPIN6 ETC. TO f6a3qqqJ2 -, I; ,ode ~0 PREWNSTRIJCTION QUALIITY. _ 4 I ~ '/ O· {fl~ ,~! " r\( () ~ 2.01% , EXISTIN/ ~ / EOA=3qqq.45 t~ xt~l ~ ~ :t < !!) _, :,: u., .. MATCH / EOAJlqqb1 5'-0" MIN TRANS!T!ON BETWEEN EXITIN6 ROLLED CURB TO NEW MODIFJED CURB EOA-3qq~h\ \ / <c, IBC•3qqB.q3 • : ! \ Fe.3qqq.03 • 1 I ' EOA•~qB.5B \ \ l / 5 '-0" MJN TRANSITION BETWEEN EXITIN& ROLLED CURB TO NEW MODIFJED CURB \ \ : ' I \ 1 1 ~~ \ I II 112 !!) \ I I ~) w • 1 I ,I I ~>' \ ~ \ MATCH~ IBC•~qB.14 . ) MATCH _[. FL•3'1qB.3b / I II 'I 111 111 I I MATCH -~~~--r MATCH EOA•3qqB .3j 111 I I \ \ >/ /o' ~A, ( ~· v'J. ,;-· I / '} ~'), '( tf ~ ~'r ~~ 1.28% ;t' _(c,. ___ _ / I _J_~~ I /T I v~ v· ~ '%, I ~ ill~ N tw I ~f ~,Y, I "' "' I ,f" ,, I o>r o>r '--. 1:::::::: !~ '--. ~ '--. '--. '--. '--. '--. / .-{!)_ ------ - - --.{52.-----' / -__C7 --MATCH / ~~-----=---------,~--~---=----EXSTING ..._ I ,;;~0,,'0 · ' " ·"' -5Lff'E--~1' '-'- j 1 " "' I: " 1 1 '- I ' 1.00% 1.00% El ,, NOTE LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE EX. EASEMENT PR. SAW CUT EX. ASPHALT EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. CONTOUR MAJOR EX . CONTOUR MINOR PR. CONTOUR MAJOR PR. CONTOUR MINOR CENTER LINE DAYLIGHT LINE EX. SEWER LINE PR. SLOPE & DIRECTION EX. SLOPE & DIRECTION EX. SEWER MANHOLE EX. LIGHT POLE OWNER MJ5T PROVIDE THE CITY A LETTER OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION Sl6NED e AGKNOJ,,JLED6ED BY THE OWNER OF LOT 24 THAT A TEMPORARY CONSTRUC,TION EASEMENT WILL BE &RANTED TO ALLOW 6RADIN6 AND RECONSTRIJGTION OF THE PORTION OF THE DRIVEWAY AFFEGTED BY THE CON5TRUC,TJON DATE: /0/0)/1£;, JOB NO.: K'1538-/5 DESIGNED BY: BDH CHECKED BY: RAR DWG: K'1538 CONST. ~ ~ z ~ > ~ ~=! ~ f-< ; (:Q < ; z-~ u ~ ~o; C/) = OV1 ~ V1 ~ ~< ~ 352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790 Ph (435) 673 -8586 Fx (435) 673 -8397 www.racivil.com z 0 -j > -Q /:0 ::l 0... ~ ~ ~ 0 0:: V'.l O !3 z ~o~ ~ -Zoo Q -"'::.: ~ ~§ 0 U z ~ ~ /:0 SHEET GR-01 5 OF 1 SHEETS EXHIBIT 2 7 of 9Page 223 of 295CffN}fe'R 1ST. ~ > ~ ~ PROJECT ~ %l ':!, VICINITY NAP 0 GENERAL WATER AND SEWER NOTES I. All CONSTRIJGTJON OF WATER MAINS SHALL BE PER MOAB GITY DE516N STANDARDS AN Fl.JBUG IMPROVEMENT SPEGIFICAITONS (HOST C,IJRRfNT VERSION). 2. THE LOCATION. OF EXISTIN6 Bl/RlfD UTILITlf5 SHOWN ON TH IS Pi...AN ARE INTENDED FOR CONTRACTOR 'S BIDD1N6 REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSJBLE FOR HAVIN6 ALL 6JRIID UTIL m ES LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUGTION AND SHALL NOTI FY EN6 INEER Jf CON.fL!C,TS ARE ENCOJNTERED . 3. WATER LINES SHALL BE SANITIZED AND FLUSHED PER STATE OF UTAH SPEGIFIGATIONS AND LABORATORY lBT REe(JL TS RJRNISHED TO MOAB CITY FOR THEIR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PL.Ac.IN6 LINES IN SERVICE. 4. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 48 IN. WYER OVER THE TOP TO THE PJPE . 5. LIVE TAPS INTO EXISTING i,.IATER MAINS SHALL BE CONDUGTED BY Gl TY PERSO NNEL. PRO..IEGT CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSJBLE FOR PROVJDIN6 THE NEC.ESSARY f !TTINeS AND SHAU.. PROVIDE EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL. GONTRACTOR SHALL C.OORDINATE Ac.TM TI ES V'!I TH MOAB CITY UTILITIES. ALL BENDS IN WATER MAIN SHALL HAVE GONGRETE THRUST Bl0CKJN6 PER MOAB GCTY DES16N STANDARD DETAIL. 6. LIVE TAPS INTO EXISTIN6 SEWER SERVICE CONNEGTION SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY CITY PERSONNEL . PROJECT CONTRACTOR SHAU BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVID IN6 THE NECESSARY FITI IN6S AND SHAL L PROVIDE EXG-AVAT!ON AND BACKFILL. CONTRACTOR SHAU COORD INATE AGT!V!TlfS HJTH MOAB CITY lJTJLITIES. ALL BENDS IN SEWER SERV!c.E SHAU HAVE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKJN6 PER MOAB CITY DE5!6N STANDARD DETAIL. 1. BELLED ENDS OF WATER AND SEWER MAIN PIPES SHALL BE ORIE NTED TOWARDS THE UPHIL L END OF THE PIPELINE. ~ ...... ~® ~')fe -Know what's below. Call before you dig. NOTICE, EX1STIN6 UTILITIES ARE SHOHN ON PLANS FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR rs RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES. THE ENGINEER BEARS NO RESPONS!BJLITY FOR UTI!..JTIES NOT SHOV'IN OR SHOHN 1NCORRECTL Y. I ---- Lor 24 ~ I I I I I I .... 0' .._ ........._ I I I OWNER -........ I I .._ .._ I I I I TH E OW NER OF THIS PROJECT IS CHAD HARRIS 1>01-243-04qq ............... 0 ' .... I II .._ I ~ 0 .,\ .._ I .... I I I \ " I I I I I ~ \ I I 1,. II ~ II 0 e/>' I l i'@, I j~ ~ 2-\;?, I ~6 \i 1t I \!Ii ~ I ~ -,,)"' I '?, ;11'1; I J"\~ I ii\ \l\ PROPOSED rlATER~ \11 I '1 0 I I I I ' I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I c had .d .harr is@gma i I .com ENERGY SERVICES ROGKY MOUNTAIN PO HER 1 10 N. MAIN ST. R JG HF JELD, UTAH 1'4101 1'1'1'-221-1010 WATER& WASTE WATER MOAB H ATER DE PARTM ENT 211 E CE NTER ST. MOAB UT, B4532 435-25q-14e,5 NATVRALGAS QUESTAR 2450 S . HWY 1q1 MOAB, UT 1'4532 435-25q-1131 ~ ;\~SE""R PROPOSEDX~R ~ -~ \ GlcAIWC~ ...... _.. _.. --~ > \ l / 0 PROPOSED RELOGA TION OF HATER METER EXISTIN6 MANHOLE RIM 401b.<i INV IN (NORTH) 4013.45 INV IN (EAST) 4012 .'11 INV OUT (SOJTH) 4012 .'-13 ,...,,. ~ I ' !!' I ,, 1\ , '\,-DI" II §,i, ~ ,,, ~., ~ l'l-, ce! ~· I . I ~ 1 ' ~ :\\ I >5 I \ ~ '\ I I! _ ($ ~0 v PROPOSED RELOGA TION OF PO~R POL£11..16HT POLE ~~ LP \ ~ 't I ~HATER \!-;--...:-~--r = =\= l= = = = = 1= = = 0 _'.:::"C...._~====E=l -= = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = =-- 176/<-6-- -7--LG-4 -j-6---G-r-G---6---G---6-ExisOO 2 ~AS LlNE --G---G---6---G---6---G---c %// -ss-6 --ss---\_ --sS--6 '1 -ss--6"--E~STWSb'tSEHER~--6"'--ss--6" 1 k , \ I If I :.!I I I I I ~' I I ll) ,'fl EX!S TIN6 PO!aER ~\ ~ I / I I POLE/LIGHT POLE cf I I I I _I TO BE RELOCATED > ~ ! 1 1 I • \ s'i i I I I w II w I EX1STIN6 11 I "i ~ ' l /YN.VE : : l i / EXJSTIN6TEE ~-\_--H--e-G4------EXJS-Tl~~""lER ~AJN __ H---H---H---w---H---H---H---s---e~ I I I Co s ) 11 I ~ I ,; I II l ,'i i ~I I I I '"~ ~ I I I ~ I '(T I !I I n I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I 11 11 11 11 11 11 I I I I I I I I ) ;,. I C T ~ I I I s'i , I ~ '"I l I I I I I ' ~/ I " I I I I J I 0 I I I 0 I I I 0 I I I C I I I 0 .r I I C I j, I I I • I I ~ I I • I I 0 '" I I • I I ~ I I • I " I "1 I I I I I I I I I " I I I I I I I " I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /~-------------------------------------------- GD 0 10 ' 20' SC.ALE , 1"=10 ' DATE: /0/0)/16 JOB NO.: KCf538-/5 DESIGNED BY: BDH CHEC KED BY: RAR DWG: KCf538 CONST. ~ ~ ~ ~=! ~ f-, ; ~<; z:1: ~o C/) cc w w z CJ 0 Cl) :'; Cl) ~ ~< ~ 352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790 Ph (435) 673 -8586 Fx (435) 673 -8397 www.racivil.com z 0 > ..... ~ Q ~ .....:i ~ g :;! 11,, ~ 0 !:i ;;,.. ~O ifi. E--< ... z "" :;! ..... 0 0 .....:i ..... 0:, :a: ~ ~~ E--< " ~ c5 z ~ ~ ~ SHEET UT-01 6 OF 1 SHEETS EXHIBIT 2 8 of 9Page 224 of 295GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1. THE CONTRAG TOR SHALL BE RESPONSJBLE FOR THE LOGA TION AND PROTEG TION Of ALL EXI5TIN6 l!NDER&RCVND UTILJTIE, DVRIN6 GONSTRJJGTION . 2. n-tE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO GALL THE GJTY EN61NNER fOR lNSPEGTION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THIS PROJECT. 3. THE GONTRAGTOR IS REGlUIRED TO OBTAIN AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ANY N::JRK DONE IN A Fl.JBLJG Rl6HT-Of-WAY. 4. ANY NEG ESSARY MODIF!GA TIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DES l6N EN&INEER PRIOR TO CONS TRJJG TION. 5. LINLESS NOTED OTHERi,,J.JSE ON THESE PLANS, ALL CONSTRUGTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "MOAB CITY DE516N STANDARDS AND PIJBLIG IMPROVl:MENT SPEGIAGA TIONS ", "THE IN TERNA TIONAL PLUMBING WDE", AND THE "UNIFORM BUILDING GODE " LATEST EDITION AS ADMINISTERED BY MOAB CITY. 5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION Of ALL EXISTIN6 LITILITY, STORM DRAIN AND FIRE SERVICE LINES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON UTILITY PLAN. 6. MANHOLES MlJST HAVE PLYV'OOD IN THE BOTIOM DUR1N6 ASPHALT REMOVAL. ; QUESTAR GAS NOTES I. DEVELOPER NEEDS TO CONTACT QUESTAR 6AS PRIOR TO BREAKIN6 6ROUND FOR 6A5 516N UP . 2. DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO 6ET ALL COMPACTION TESTS DONE AT DEVELOPER 'S EXPENSE. 3. IF GASIN6S/WNDUITS ARE NEEDED, THEY ARE TO BE INSTALLED BY DEVELOPER AT HIS/HER COST. A MAP WILL BE AVAILABLE AT Ql/ESTAR 6A5 FOR GASIN6 LOCAT IONS . 4. ALL OF THE 10 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENTS BACK OF SIDEHALK WILL BE 6RADED TO WITHIN 6 INGHE5 OF TOP BACK OF GlJRB BEFORE 6AS LINES WILL BE INSTALLED . 0 •0 DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS OF ANY 6AS LINES TO BE LOWERED AND/OR RELOCATED AFTER INSTALLATION. 5 ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND ALL DEBRIS, CO NSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND EXCESS DIRT PILES SHALL BE CLEARED AWAY. 6. PROPERTY LOT LINES, BACK OF GlJRB AND 6RADE MUST BE STAKED BY DEVELOPER BEFORE 6A5 WILL BE INSTAU£D. 1. WATER AND SEWER LINES, OJLVERTS OR OTHER HAZARDS NOT GLEARL Y NOTICEABLE SHALL BE STAKED BY DEVELOPER. b. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE NOTES WILL REei.JL T IN DE LAY OF 6AS SERVICE TO THIS PROJECT 'I. ***UJMPORTANT NOTIGE***** 6AS WILL BE FVT ON THE SCHEDULE FOR INSTALLATION WHEN POWER TRENCH IS BIJRIED, STREETS ARE WITHIN 6 INCHES OF SUB-6RADE AND THE 10 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT IS 6RADED TO TOP BACK OF GIJRB. 10. UTILITY SEPARATION WATER TO PHONE LINES/GABLE 1V -5' 6AS TO WATER -5' WATER TO POWER -5' WATER TO IRRl6ATION -10' WATER TO WASTEWATER -10' (HORIZONTAL) lb" (VERTICAL) WATER TO WATER -3' 6AS TO POWER -10' POWER NOTES I. PRIHARY POWER FROM SWITCH TO SWITCH SHALL BE 150 WIRE IN 3 " WNDUIT . 2. PRIHARY POWER FROM VAULT TO TRANSFORMER SHALL BE 1/0 WIRE IN 2 " WNDIJ IT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3 SECONDARY POWER FROM TRANSFORMER TO METER SHALL BE : 100-150 AMPS =b IN 2" CONDUIT 200 AMPS = ! IN 2" CONDUIT 400 AMPS = 350 MGM IN 3" CONDUIT 600 AMPS = 500 MGM IN 3" WNDIJIT 4. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW ALL BLUE STAKES PROTOCOLS. 5. ALL GHAN6ES TO EXISTING 6RADES NEAR EX ISTING POWER LITILmES MUST BE APPROVED BY MOAB CITY PRIOR TO WNSTRIJGTION. Y,,ASTE WATER NOTES 1. ALL CONSTRJJGTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "MOAB CITY DESI6N STANDARDS AND AJBLIG IMPROVEMENT SPEGIFIGATIONS" SECTION G. 2. 50' MAXIMUM SPACE BETWEEN SEWER LATERAL GLEANOUTS . 3. PRIVATE SEWER LINES TO BE MAINTAINED BY OWNER. 4. WATER NOTES 1. ALL WATERL INE WORKS MlJST BE INSTALLED BY A GONTRAGTOR THAT HAS BEEN PR.E-0.JALIFIID BY THE MOAB CITY WATER DEPARTMENT . 2 . ALL GONSm.!GTION SHALL GONFORM TO THE "MOAB GITY DESIGN STANDARDS AND PIJBLI G IMPROVEMENT SPfG!flGATIONS " SECT ION b, "THE IN TERNATIONAL PWMB IN6 WDE ", AND THE "UNIFORM aJILDIN6 CODE " LATEST EDITION AS ADMIN ISTERED BY MOAB CITY . 3 . WNTRAGTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL P1PEL1NE5 AND VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH PRIOR TO PROGEEDIN& WITH ANY BJ!LDIN6 OR PlPELINE WNSTRUGTION . 4. THE POTABLE WATER 51.ff'LY TO LAWN IRRI&ATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROTEC-TED A6AINST BAGKFLOW PER THE INTERNATIONAL PWMBIN6 CODE (!PG) SECTION Wb.1 6 .5 AND FOR FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS PER (!PG) 608.16.4. 5. BAGKFLOW PREVENTION DEVIGES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL CU LI NARY SERVICE CONNECT IONS IN CONFORMANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFORM PUJMBIN6 CODE CHAPTER 10 (APPEND IX J). ALL TESTING, MAINTENANCE , AND/OR REPAIR SHALL BE PERFORMED BY GERTIFJED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TEGHN IGIANS . 6 . 14 6AU6E WIRE SHALL BE TAPED TO ALL WATER LINES FOR LOGATIN6 FVRPOSES. THE WIRE SHALL ALSO BE BROU6HT UP AT EACH VALVE BOX AND HYDRANT. 1. ALL FITTIN65 AT BENDS AND BRANCHES IN WATER PIPE LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CONCRETE THRJJST BLOGK IN6 AS SHOWN ON THE STANDARD THRUST BLOGK IN6 DETA IL SHEET IN THE MOAB CITY DE516N STANDARDS . b . ASPHALT REPLACED OVER THE PIPE TRENG HI N6 15 TO MATCH EXISTIN6 PAVEMENT DEPTHS WITH A 6 " OVER CUT FROM ED6E OF THE TRENCH LI NE ON EACH SIDE OF THE TRENCH . Cl . WNTRAGTORS SHALL GUT Off AND GAP (BACK AT THE WATER MAIN), ALL EX ISTING SERVICE LINES OR UNLISED STUB LINES THAT WILL BE ABANDONED . 10 . ANY GHAN6E5 MADE IN THE FIELD MUST BE FIRST APPROVED AND DOOJMENTED BY MOAB CITY WATER SUPERV ISOR LEVI JONES AT 435 -25G-14b5 . 11 . SEWER MAIN I~Jlf . Jl~ffi11ljjj! ~*~~ffimr ffi=I I l=llffill\ ,jjj"lJ!TrETr 1111~;Ilrr!Jlf _ll~ffi11l 1m!lhii'w E9 2 "x4" LUMBER MARKER WITH EXPOSED END ON PROPERTY LINE PAINTED RED IF LATERAL 15 ENDED AT PROPERTY LINE 4 " MIN P.V.G. SEWER PIPE 2% SLOPE MIN. (\"! I FTJ WATER Tl6HT PU.!6 IF ENDED AT PROPERTY LINE SEWER LATERAL SC.ALE , N.T.S. i <, _l 4 " MIN P.V.G. SEWER PIPE ~" MAX BfDD!N6 NOTES , I. MAX DISTANCE BETWEEN GLEANOUTS: 50' f-------5' ----~-, ~ "' L,-----,J t .'\_ GAST IRON GLEANOIJT PIPE I "1'I' SEWER PIPE FROM HOJ5f 2 . LATERAL SHALL NOT ENTER MANHOLES lJNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY MOAB CITY EN6 INEER AND CITY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. STRUCTURE WNGRETE CURB I 61/TTl'R \ lb" GAST IRON COVER WITH LOGK IN 6 Nl!T (SET TO 6RADE) I ~ ~ b " MIN. I " STANDARD COPPER SETIER WITH DUAL CHEGK VALVE AND BACKFLOW PREVENTOR I " TYPE K WPPfR PIPE (NO JOtNTS) CORP STOP FLARED CO NNECTION Ml/ELLER OF APPROVED EQUAL T APPIN6 SADDLE SOLID BRASS STRAP FOR PVC DOJBLE BRASS STRAP FOR DUCTI LE IRON ClJ U NARY WATER MAIN B ~ ~ '" WATER MElfR AND SPL IT YOKE NEP1llNE BRAND OR APPROVED EQUAL lb" PREGAST MElfR BOX 1" TYPE K WPPER, STUB TO 5' MIN. INSIDE PROPERTY LI NE AND PUJe . INSTAL L APPROVED LOGATIO N MARKER. OR EaJAL AS APPROVED BY MOAB CITY PUBL IC WORKS DEPARTI"IENT NOTES , I. I0 '-0 " ED6E TO ED6E HOR!Z . IS REGD BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER LATERAL SERVICE LINES. 2 WHERE WATER AND SEWER LATERALS M.JST GROSS, WATER LATERAL SHALL BE lb" ABOVE THE SEWER LATERAL AS MEA9.JRED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER LATERAL TO THE TOP TO THE SEWER LATERAL THIS SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR A MINIMUM OF I0'-0" EITHER SIDE OF THE GROSSIN6 PO IN T. 3 . TEFLON TAPE IS REQD ON ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS. 4 . COORDINATE PLACEMENT OF WATER METER WITH MOAB CITY PUBLIC WClRKS DEPT B TYPICAL WATER SERVICE CONNECTION SCALE : N.T.S. DATE: /0/0)/16 JOB NO.: KCf538-/5 DESIGNED BY: BDH CHEC KED BY: RAR DWG: KCf538 CONST. ~ ~ z 0 ~ > w ~ ~=! ~ f-, ; ~<; z:: ~o ; C/) = ov, ~ V1 ~ ~< ~ 352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790 Ph (435) 673 -8586 Fx (435) 673 -8397 www.racivil.com z 0 > ....... ~ Q~ .....:i ~ g :;! 11,, ~ 0 !:i ;>-< ~Oifi. E--< ... z "" :;! ....... 0 0 .....:i ....... 0:, :a: ~ ~~ E--< " ~ c5 z ~ ~ ~ SHEET UT-02 7 OF i SHEETS Project OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST Updated January 24, 2017 Phase 1 Item Description Quantity Units Unit Price Total 1 Excavation 402 cu yd $4.00 $1,608.00 2 4" Hot Asphalt Mix 3,331 sq ft 5.00 16,655.00 3 8" Type II Road Base Course 3,331 sq ft 0.80 2,664.80 4 30" Curb & Gutter (w/ Type II Base)125 ln ft 25.00 3,125.00 5 Sewer Lateral 6"1 each 1,000.00 1,000.00 6 Water Meter Service (1")1 each 1,000.00 1,000.00 7 Relocate light/power pole 1 each 2,173.00 2,173.00 Subtotal $28,225.80 15%Contingency $4,233.87 Total Amount $32,459.67 K9538 Buen Camino Subdivision Moab, Utah The user of the above opinion of probable construction cost understands that Rosenberg Associates ,the Consultant,has no control over the cost or availability of labor, equipment or materials,or over market conditions or the Contractor's method of pricing,and that the Consultant's opinions of probable construction costs are made on the basis of the Consultant's professional judgement and experience.The Consultant makes no warranty,express or implied,that the bids or the negotiated cost of the Work will not vary from the above. EXHIBIT 2 9 of 9 Page 225 of 295 AAAGENDA SUMMARY  CITY OF MOAB COUNCIL MEETING  June 23, 2015 February 28, 2017 PL-17-30 Agenda Item #: 8-4  Title: Consideration of Resolution #16‐2017 Conditionally Approving the Final Plat for Phase II, Valley  View Subdivision, Located in the R‐2 Zone on Property Located at Approximately 930 Mill Creek  Drive as Referred to Council by the Planning Commission  Staff Presenter(s): Jeff Reinhart, City Planner  Department: Planning and Zoning  Applicant: Route 46, LLC  Representatives: Tim Keogh and Bill Winfield  Background/Summary:  The City received an application for approval of the Final Plat for Phase II of the Valley View Subdivision  development on January 3, 2017. This phase consists of 8 single family lots, ranging in size from 5,036  square feet to 7,642 square feet, as well as three attached single family lots for a total of fourteen  dwellings.  The application includes a required plat dedication for Valley View Court, a cul‐de‐sac that accesses the  future homes. Extensions of Parcels A and B are shown as extensions of the walking trail through the  development. Parcel A was originally dedicated as a detention area for the entire project (and the  walking path). Parcel B also provides utility extensions.  The plat and the submitted documents have been reviewed by city staff and no major concerns remain.   On January 26, 2017, the Planning Commission reviewed the plat for this phase of Valley View  Subdivision with a condition:  1.A Development Improvements Agreement shall be approved by the City Council prior to recording the final plat. Process   The applicable code sections are discussed in the addendum below.  Staff Recommendation: Staff agrees with the Planning Commission and recommends that the final plat  of Phase II of the Valley View Subdivision be approved with the condition:  1.A Development Improvements Agreement shall be approved by the City Council prior to recording the final plat. Agenda Summary  Page 226 of 295 Recommended Motion:  I move to approve Resolution #16‐2017, conditionally approving the final plat  for Phase II of the Valley View Subdivision with the condition:   1.A Development Improvements Agreement shall be approved by City Council prior to recording the final plat. Attachment(s): Copy of Resolution #16‐2017   Final Plat‐Phase II  Page 227 of 295 Process Addendum  Moab Municipal Code (MMC) Chapter 16.16, Final Plat, contains the description of the documents for a  final plat that must comply with the provisions set out in Sections 16.16.020 through 16.16.040.   Final plats shall show the following information:  A.The name of the subdivision; B.Accurate angular and linear dimensions for all lines, angles and curves used to describe boundaries, streets, alleys, easements, areas to be reserved for public use and any other important features; C.An identification system for all lots and blocks and names of streets.  Lot lines shall show dimensions in feet and hundredths.  Actual house numbers, as assigned by the city engineer, shall be shown; D.True angles and distances to the nearest established street lines or official monuments, which shall be accurately described on the final plat and shown by appropriate symbols; E.Radii, internal angles, points and curvatures, tangent bearings and the length of all curves; F.The accurate location of all monuments and fire hydrants to be installed shown by the appropriate symbol.  All United States, state, city or other official benchmarks, monuments or triangulation stations in or adjacent to the property, shall be preserved in precise position; G.Dedicate to the city all streets, highways, and other public lands included in the proposed subdivision; H.Pipes or other such physical monuments as shall be placed at each lot corner; I.Where it is proposed that streets be constructed on property controlled by a public agent or utility company, approval for the location, improvement and maintenance of such streets be obtained from the public agency or utility company and entered on the final plat in a form approved by the city attorney. MMC Section 16.16.030 goes on to require the following on a final plat.  A.A registered professional engineer or land surveyors’ “Certificate of Survey”; B.The owners’ “Certificate of Dedication”; C.A notary public’s “Acknowledgement”; D.The city planning commission’s “Certificate of Approval”; E.The city engineers’ “Certificate of Approval”; F.The utility supervisors’ “Certificate of Approval”; G.The city attorney’s “Certificate of Approval”; H.The city council’s “Certificate of Approval”; I.Certificate of filing to be completed by county recorder; J.The planning coordinator’s “Certificate of Approval.” MMC 16.08.010(E) states that “Following final approval by the city council, the final plat bearing all  official signatures and/or approvals as herein required shall be submitted to the office of the county  recorder for recording by the subdivider.  A sepia, autopositive, CD disc or other reproducible copy  together with two standard prints of the final plat shall be supplied to the zoning administrator.  The  final plat of a subdivision shall be recorded within a period of one hundred eighty days following  approval by the city council.  A one‐time extension of an additional thirty days may be granted at the  discretion of the city council.  Failure on the part of the subdivider to record a final plat of a subdivision  within the time period above shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration by both the city planning  commission and the city council will be required before its acceptance.”    Page 228 of 295 CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION #16-2017 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONAL APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE II, ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-2 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, Tim Keogh, representing Route 46, LLC, with a mailing address of Box 396, Moab, Utah 84532, has applied to develop fourteen total residential dwellings (8 single family dwellings and 3 attached single family dwellings) for Phase II of the Valley View Subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the applicant provided the City of Moab with the necessary documents, plans and drawings to complete the application for the Final Plat-Phase II of the proposed subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the City of Moab Planning Commission (“Commission”) held a public meeting to review the proposal on January 26, 2017; and, WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) held a public meeting to review Phase II Final Plat on February 28, 2017; and, WHEREAS, Council found that the proposed lots meet or exceed the minimum required lot size for detached single family residences of five thousand (5,000) square feet for the R-2 Residential Zone as described in Chapter 17.45.030 of the Moab Municipal Code and the lot size requirements of six thousand (6,000) square feet for attached single-family dwellings (“twin homes”); and, WHEREAS, Council, having considered Staff recommendations and discussed the pertinent aspects of the development, determined that the proposed final plat of the Valley View Subdivision, Phase II, has met or can meet the requirements of Titles 16 and 17 of the Moab Municipal Code and other applicable regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Moab City Council that with the adoption of Resolution #16- 2017, hereby approves Phase II of the Valley View Subdivision with the following condition: 1.A Development Improvements Agreement shall be approved by City Council prior to recording the final plat. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on February 28, 2017. SIGNED: ______________________________ David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Rachel Stenta, Recorder Page 229 of 295 Page 230 of 295 VICINITY MAP L ', . • ... ,It!! 1 -·I ·--1 -- ; ·.-w ·: ,i;-,s I '' Ii ' ' '' ' · 1.,,,.,. ' I •/_:I I o'J , I, I •. I' ' I ., j. I. ,, r I r " ' . J...,,,,,.. <'I, "G,c,,y Ann ' . ' . ' H S'·· • •II .'' c .. 1,,.11'. ~·. '• .l .• ' .1 THIS SUBDIVIS ION CURVE SCHEDULE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD BRNG CHORD Cl 21.99' 14.00' S16 °02' 45'\./ 19.80' C2 24.59' 250.00' S31"46'35'E 24.58' C3 82,12' 250.00' S44"00'18'E 81.75' C4 24.42' SO.OD' S74"38'29'\./ 24.17' cs 15.65' 50.00' N82"24'10'\./ 15.59' C6 10.02' SO.DO' N6 7° 41 ' 44 '\./ 10.00' C7 17.14' SO.DO' N52"08 '05'\./ 17.06' CB 22.58' 50.00' N29°22'37'\./ 22.39' C9 35.25' 50.00' N03°45'30'E 34.53' ClO 10.28' 50.00' N29"50' 4 7'E 10.26' Cll 39.90' 50.00' N58"35' 43'E 38 .85' C12 38.46' 50.00' S76"30'30'E 37.52' C13 4 7.83' 50.00' S27"03'55'E 46.03' C14 9.69' 300.00' S53"30'30'E 9.69' C15 49.99' 300.00' S47"48'35'E 49.93' C16 49.78' 300.00' S38"16'57'E 49.72' C!7 23.93' 300.00' S3! 014'37'E 23.93' C18 163.38' 275,00' S45°58'43'E 160.99' LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 15.00' N35°31' 4 7'E L2 15 00' N08°32' 4 7'1./ L3 26.98' so5°16'1B'\./ L4 3.94' N28°57'30'\./ LS 6.23' N28"57'30'\./ L6 21.29' Sl 9•09'09'E L7 0.78' S27"00'03'\./ LB 17.26' N60°12'46'E L9 39.32' N4 7°09' 45'\./ NOTES 1. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS & RESTRICTIONS (CC&R's) FOR TI-/IS DEVELOPMENT ARE RECORDED IN BOOK 831. PAGE 578 OF THE GRAND COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE . 2. PARCEL B HEREON IS HEREBY DEDICATED TO MOAB CITY FOR PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ANO A PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT. SAID PATHWAY SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF MOAB . 3. PARCEL A, THE RETENTION POND PARCEL WAS DEDICATED. VIA THE PHASE I PLAT. TO VALLEY VIEW VIEW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WHICH WI LL HAVE THE OBLIGATION TO MAINTAIN SAME UNDER THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED AT BOOK 831, PAGE 578 OF THE GRAND COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE. A FINAL PLAT OF VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE II IN THE NE1 / 4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 100 200 K.-.1 l __ ~I ( IN FEET ) 1 inch ~ 50 ft. \I All V E W SUB D. 10 I I POlNT-OF -8EGINNtNG / SW CORNER OF LOT 11 OF VALLEY I/IEW SUBD., PHASE I 11 ) ""' ·'>' 1 \ 1.J ·'>" 'i'<:,'o 7430 SQ. FT. 994 s. 1-"s. 6'._, s'l<". ·ss. Oo, -if ,""':Jro· 14 7382 SQ. FT 1002 s. 15 4- 1114 SQ. FT . ..__rf'· 1006 s. "'> ~ --~ 16 -ro0 • ·"s-·"'°' 5482 SQ. FT. , .<-)-':> 1010 S. · rn ,1,: S0 ,,._<b ;;, _t-) s.,. ·,.,)> 0J -o 77, • ~ f"' J's., co "'--------,----~ S89'48'24"W 95.02' LEGEND @ 5/8" REBAR WlTH PLASTIC CAP AT LOT CORNER (TO BE SET) • FOUND REBAR MONUMENT THIS SURVEY FOUND GOVERNMENT BRASS CAP MONUMENT FIRE HYDRANT A 17 PARCEL A 20-A ~ 7611 SQ . FT. '1- 1009 s. -Sc -~ '],'], o~· <o '\ V ?:r -E, 2 0-B 5885 SQ. FT. 1011 S. 19 c9 rPARCELB 7642 SQ. FT. 1015 S. SEE NOTE #2 ~;~_SS ,,{:, 0-9;&7, < "s. (' \ "( ' 0 9''· 18 I "'· ,, € 0 """ 6871 SQ. FT. o.!\. • 'ff,0£, I ':.<" 1018 s. ~ 7040 SQ. FT. 1014 S. ~ > "'· \ \ EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM [/) (') z [I'. <( w [I] lL 0 [/) in <( [I] SE CORNER OF SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM. w '° ....J,..., o;.,,, [I'. .;- I-. zO 00 oz >-II w ....J (') ....J z <( - > °" <( w m PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE MOAB CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL MOAB CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL APPROVAL AS TO FORM SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, TIMOTHY M. KEOGH , DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A REGISTERED UTAH LAND SURVEYOR, AND THAT I HOLD CERTIFICATE NO. 171004 AS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF UTAH, AND I FURTHER CER- TIFY THAT UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MOAB, UTAH, I HAVE MADE A SURVEY OF THE TRACT OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND DESCRIBED BELOW, AND HAVE SUBD IVIDED SAID TRACT OF LAND INTO LOTS AND STREETS, HERE - AFTER TO BE KNOWN AS VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE II, AND THAT SAME HAS BEEN CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND STAKED ON THE GROUND AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION A DESCRIPTION OF LANDS WITHIN SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, AND MORE PARTUCLARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SW CORNER OF LOT 11 OF VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE I, SAID CORNER BEARS N 79'46'00"W 1667.34 FT. THENCE S 21'41'30"E 245.93 FT. FROM THE EAST Y. CORNER OF SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, AND PROCEEDING THENCE N 56"56'51"E 124.69 FT., THENCE N 28"57'30"W 76.54 FT ., THENCE N 61 "03'00"E 50 .00 FT., THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 14.00 FT. RADIUS CURVE TD THE RIGHT 21. 99 FT. (SAID CURVE HAS A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 16'02'45"E 19.80 FT.), THENCE N 51·03'oo"E 72.45 FT., THENCE S 28'57'30"E 90.58 FT., THENCE N 60"12'46"E 17.26 FT., THENCE S 28'57'30"E 50.79 FT., THENCE S 36'39'14"E 50.53 FT., THENCE S 20'59'31"W 67.96 FT., THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 50.00 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT 10.02 FT . (SAID CURVE HAS A CHORD WHICH BEARS S 67'41'44"E 10.00 FT.), THENCE N 20'59'31"E 90.52 FT., THENCE N 28"57'30"W 6.23 FT., THENCE N 60'38'00"E 72.09 FT., THENCE S 23'33'00"E 187.37 FT., THENCE S 68'56'oo"w 124.40 FT., THENCE S 19"09'09"E 90.00 FT., THENCE S 68"56'00"W 125.00 FT., THENCE N 19 "09'00"W 90.00 FT., THENCE S 89"48'24"W 95.02 FT., THENCE N 51·14'35"w 50.37 FT., THENCE N 45·54'oo"w 75.00 FT., THENCE N 21"41'30"W 67 .07 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 2.35 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. DATE OWNERS DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, HAVING CAUSED SAME TO SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND STREETS HEREAFTER TO BE KNOWN AS THE VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE II DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR PERPETUAL USE OF THE PUBLIC ALL PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS INTENDED FOR PUBLIC USE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS THIS ___ DAY OF A.D., 20 __ _ ROUTE 46, L.L .C., OWNER, BY: TIMOTHY M. KEOGH, MANAGER/MEMBER WILLIAM W. WINFIELD, MANAGER/MEMBER ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF ___ S.S. ON THE __ DAY OF A.D., 20 __ PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED NOTARY PUBLIC, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF IN SAID STATE OF UTAH, THE SIGNER( ) OF THE ABOVE OWNERS DEDICATION, IN NUMBER, WHO DULY ACKNOW- LEDGED TO ME THAT SIGNED IT FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY AND FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC RESIDING IN ____ COUNTY VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE II IN THE NE1/4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, LOCATED AT 930 MILL CREEK DRIVE. MOAB, UTAH ROUTE 46, L.L.C., OWNER & DEVELOPER PREPARED BY DRAWN BY: TMK DEC. 29, 2016 P.O. BOX 396 MOAB, UTAH, 84532 435 -220-1135 SCALE: 1"=50' COUNTY RECORDER NO. APPROVED THIS DAY OF A.D. 20 BY APPROVED THIS DAY OF A.D. 20 ---------BY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HA VE HAD THIS PLAT EXAMINED BY THIS OFFICE AND IT IS CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH INFORMATION ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. PRESENTED TO THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL APPROVED AS TO FORM THIS A.O., 20 __ DAY OF ____ _ STATE OF UTAH, CO. OF ___ _ RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF THIS DAY OF , A.D. 20 __ . VALLEY VIEW --------- MOAB CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. SUBDIVISION, PHASE I WAS ACCEPTED AND APPROVED. DATE ___ TIME ___ BOOK PAGE ___ FEE ___ _ ATTEST ________ _ CHAIRMAN MOAB CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE MOAB CITY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MOAB CITY ATTORNEY GRAND COUNTY RECORDER JAN O 3 2017 BY: AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 28, 2017 Agenda Item #: 8-5 Title: Approval of Task Order #17-04 with Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. accepting the Scope of Work for the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan project with a fee amount not to exceed $79,800 Fiscal Impact: $79,800 Staff Presenter(s): Phillip M. Bowman, P.E., City Engineer Department: Engineering Consultant: Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. (BCA) Background/Summary: This task order will allow Bowen Collins & Associates (BCA) to prepare a Sanitary Sewer Master Plan for the sanitary sewer collection system within the City. The completion of a Sanitary Sewer Master Plan will include flow monitoring in our existing collection system, computer modeling of the sewer collection system, and analysis of the system improvements needed now and in the future. One of the items created with this study will be the Capital Facilities Plan that will identify a prioritized list of capital projects needed in the sanitary sewer system. The Capital Facilities Plan will help the City plan and budget for future projects, and identify the time frames that these projects should be completed within. In addition, the completion of the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan will help the City apply for and secure grants and loans for the project needs identified in the Capital Facilities Plan. This Task Order is budgeted for in Fiscal Year 2017 as part of the “Impact Project/Sewer – Sanitary Sewer Master Plan” in the Capital Budget of the Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund. Options: The Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny, or postpone the item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Task Order. Page 231 of 295 Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Task Order #17-04 with Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc., accepting the Scope of Work for the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan project with a fee amount not to exceed $79,800.” Attachments: Task Order 17-04, with Scope of Work and Fee Estimate Page 232 of 295 Page 233 of 295 Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS TASK ORDER N0.17-04 TO MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OWNER: City of Moab Utah Effective Date of Master Agreement: April 22, 2014 THIS TASK ORDER NO. 17-04 TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (this "TASK ORDER") is made and entered into as of the __ day of 2017, by and between City of Moab, Utah (herein called OWNER) and Bowen, Collins and Associates, Inc., a Utah Corporation (herein called ENGJNEER) who agree as follows: 1. 2. PROJECT. The PROJECT associated with this TASK ORDER is described as follows: Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. The PROJECT SITE is the City of Moab, Utah. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The SCOPE OF SERVICES and deliverables associated with this TASK ORDER is defined in the letter proposal dated November 4, 2016. 3 . FEES. OWNER shall reimburse for services provided under this TASK ORDER on a time and expense basis not to exceed $79,800.00. Payment shall be in accordance with the FEE SCHEDULE included in Attachment B of the letter proposal and in accordance with the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. 4 . SCHEDULE. The SERVICES associated with this TASK ORDER arc anticipated to be completed within eight weeks after receiving authorization to proceed. 5 . ATTACHMENTS AND EXHIBITS. Both parties have read and understood all attachments and exhibits referenced in or attached to this TASK ORDER and agree that such items are hereby incorporated into and made a part of the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. TN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and ENGINEER have executed this TASK ORDER as of the date first above written. CITY OF MOAB, UTAH (OWNER) November 4, 2016 Phillip Bowman, P.E. City Engineer City of Moab 217 E Center St Moab, Utah 84532 Subject: Proposal to Provide Engineering Services for Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Project Dear Mr. Bowman: Bowen, Collins & Associates, Inc. (BC&A) is excited to present this proposal to provide engineering services for the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Project. APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK Moab City is a growing, dynamic community that will face many changes over the next several decades. In the long-term, the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget projects an increase in population for the City of nearly 55 percent. In addition to Moab City’s growth, the Moab City sewer system collects and treats flow from Spanish Valley Water and Sewer District. Growth and changes in the community will challenge the City’s ability to reliably provide municipal services to its residents. In preparation for these challenges, Moab City is looking for assistance in developing a comprehensive plan to meet future sewer system needs. This plan will include consideration of all pertinent issues associated with providing reliable service to the residents of Moab City including conveyance, asset management, operation costs, and setting reasonable fees that will sustainably finance the maintenance and development of the wastewater system. Scope of Work The purpose of this project is to evaluate the effect of new growth on the City’s sewer system and to update the City’s hydraulic model and capital facilities plan. The Scope of Services presented herein describes the individual tasks performed to accomplish this objective. The tasks are shown below: Task Description • Task 1 Collect, Review, and Organize Data • Task 2 Evaluate Current Sewer Production Patterns and Project Future Production • Task 3 Develop and Calibrate a Hydraulic Model of the Existing Sewer Collection System • Task 4 Identify Existing Operating Deficiencies • Task 5 Identify Projected Future Operating Deficiencies • Task 6 Evaluate Improvements to Resolve Identified Deficiencies • Task 7 Develop a Sewer System Capital Facilities Plan • Task 8 Document Results Page 234 of 295 Task 1 - Collect, Review, and Organize Data Objective: To collect, review, and organize the data needed to update and calibrate a digital model of the City of Moab sewer system that will be used to simulate sewer system operation under different scenarios and identify system deficiencies and needed capital improvements. Activities: 1. Review the following information that will be provided by Moab City: • Previous sanitary sewer studies • Recent Moab City Annual Reports • Culinary water use data • Boundaries of future annexations areas and potential service areas • Existing sewer system maps and attributes in GIS format that (if known) includes pipe location, age, material, and locations and sizes of existing manholes • GIS information detailing locations and attributes of pump stations, flow monitors, and other pertinent system facilities • Growth projections from the City and the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget. • Digital files containing aerial mapping and topographic data of the sewer system service area • GIS shape files of current City boundaries, sewer system service area, and parcel boundaries with required attributes. • Historic flows and patterns collected from the wastewater treatment plant. • Existing InfoSWMM Model 2. Prepare for and attend a project kickoff meeting to review the project objectives and schedule, develop project and data coordination procedures, and discuss questions regarding information provided by the City. Products: 1. Information and understanding needed to calibrate a computer model of the Moab City sewer system and use it in preparing a capital improvements plan. Task 2: Evaluate Current Sewer Production Patterns and Project Future Use Objective: To determine the potential quantity and collection of sewer flows in the Moab sewer system. Activities: 1. Prepare for and attend a project kickoff meeting to review the project objectives and schedule, develop project and data coordination procedures, and discuss questions regarding information provided by the City. 2. Based on water use records and flow data, evaluate current sewer production patterns in Moab. This includes identifying average historical production, peaking factors, seasonal use patterns, and the effects of water conservation. 3. Examine land use and zoning maps to estimate future density and development in currently undeveloped areas. Meet with City personnel to consider any known plans for future increases in density in currently developed areas or potential annexations. 4. Develop projected demands for Moab through build out based on the combined results of the activities described above. 5. Deploy flow monitors and collect data for calibrating the City’s hydraulic model. Five flow monitors will be deployed to monitor 10 sites for two weeks at each site. For this task, it is assumed Moab City personnel can assist with traffic control for monitor deployment. All other metering services to be Page 235 of 295 performed by BC&A or its subcontractors. Monitors will be deployed at five locations for two weeks, and will subsequently be moved to another five sites to monitor for two weeks. Products: 1. Charts and tables as necessary to summarize the City’s current sewer production patterns. 2. Charts and tables as necessary to summarize the City’s projected sewer production. 3. Updated shapefile of sewer production projections. 4. Charts and tables of flow monitor data for use in calibrating the City’s hydraulic model. Task 3: Develop and Calibrate a Hydraulic Model of the Existing Sewer Collection System Objective: Calibrate the City’s existing hydraulic model utilizing the InfoSWMM software, a computer model of the existing Moab City sewer system used to simulate system operations. Moab currently has a model with updated pipe sizes and locations. Activities: 1. Use data obtained from completing Task 1 to develop an operating computer model of the Moab City sewer collection system. All major pipelines that are included in the provided shapefile and existing and previous models will be modeled and have accurate attributes contained in the existing database. 2. Use information from flow monitoring and treatment plant data to develop typical seasonal demand patterns and peaking factors used in the sewer s ystem analysis. 3. Use treatment plant and flow monitoring data to calibrate the hydraulic model to simulate field conditions. Products: 1. Use data obtained from completing data collection to develop an operating computer model of the sewer collection system. All major pipelines (6-inches and larger) will be modeled. 2. A calibrated computer model of the existing sewer system. 3. Sewer production peaking factors based on historic data. Task 4: Identify Existing Operating Deficiencies Objective: Identify portions of the existing sewer system that do not meet recommended operating criteria under several different scenarios. Activities: 1. Use the computer model to simulate operating conditions of the existing sewer system. Review computer output from the existing condition model simulations to determine if the existing facilities meet recommended operating criteria. Recommended operating criteria will be based on minimum State criteria and consultant's recommendations based on experience with other sewer systems. Identify facilities that do not meet the desired operating criteria. 2. Utilize information provided from City operations personnel to identify condition related improvements that need to be implemented in the sewer system to mitigate existing problems. Product: 1. A list of existing sewer system deficiencies. 2. A list of potential sewer system deficiencies dependent on the variables and scenario. Page 236 of 295 Task 5: Identify Projected Future Operating Deficiencies Objective: Identify portions of the existing sewer system that will not meet the recommended operating criteria under estimated demands from projected full build-out conditions. Activities: 1. Revise the projected sewer flows in the sewer system model to include future sewer system demands at 10 year and 40 year intervals. 2. Use the computer model to simulate operating conditions of the existing sewer system facilities under projected future wastewater production. Review computer output from the model simulations and identify facilities that do not meet desired operating criteria. Product: 1. A list of existing sewer system facilities that will need to be improved in order to meet desired operating criteria for projected future sewer production under various demands, variables, and scenarios listed above. Task 6: Evaluate Improvements to Resolve Identified Operating Deficiencies Objective: Evaluate alternative system improvements that, if implemented, would resolve the identified sewer system deficiencies (both existing and projected). Activities: 1. Utilize the computer model to evaluate alternative sewer system improvements to resolve the system deficiencies. 2. With City personnel, identify the recommended sewer system capital improvement projects that will best resolve the identified system deficiencies. At this time, the City will also provide a list of any additional condition related improvements it desires to include in the capital improvement plan. 3. Develop cost estimates for the recommended system improvements. With City personnel, create a prioritized list of improvements and determine the implementation year. Develop recommended timing for needed improvements based on the critical nature of needed improvements or funding/timing limitations. Product: 1. A prioritized list of alternative capital improvement projects with cost estimates that can be implemented to resolve the identified sewer system deficiencies. Task 7 - Develop Sewer System Capital Facilities Plan Objective: Develop a sewer system capital improvements plan for budgeting and planning purposes for the existing system. Activities: 1. Meet with City personnel to develop prioritization criteria for recommended sewer system improvement projects. Prioritize recommended capital improvement projects based on whether needed improvements are to correct existing deficiencies or associated with future development and the other prioritization criteria developed with City personnel. 2. Develop a detailed 10-year sewer system capital facilities plan and budget for the existing system. 3. Prioritize recommended improvements that should be made outside the 10-year planning window. Products: Page 237 of 295 1. 10-year budget plan for capital improvements. 2. Prioritized list of all capital improvements with cost estimates. Task 8 – Document Results Objective: Prepare a report summarizing the results of this study. Activities: 1. Prepare a draft report that summarizes the results of the study and presents the recommended sewer system capital improvements plan. 2. Meet with City personnel to review comments on draft report. 3. Incorporate City comments into the final report. Products: 1. Five paper copies of the draft sewer system master plan report. 2. Ten paper copies of the final sewer system master plan report. 3. One electronic PDF copy of the final sewer system master plan report. 4. Two copies of a technical appendix (if any) that contains pertinent technical data used in developing the master plan report. PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE The key dates for the preliminary schedule are as follows: Anticipated Notice of Award and Project Kickoff December 2016 Flow Monitoring Completed February 2017 Capital Facilities Plan May 2017 Final Report July 2017 Support for Implementation and Model Operation Ongoing FEE PROPOSAL Bowen Collins & Associates is committed to providing high quality engineering services at reasonable rates. We have tabulated an estimate of man-hours to complete the scope of work described previously and a corresponding not to exceed fee schedule (attached). Please note that BC&A tries to be as flexible as possible when working with clients to define project scopes and associated fees. As such, we are willing to make adjustments to any point of our proposed scope or fee to better meet the City’s needs. Page 238 of 295 Attachment BMoab CitySanitary Sewer System Master Plan ENGINEERING FEE ESTIMATEOFFICE STAFFENGINEERING TECHNICIANS10/27/2016OFFICE EDITOR TECH 1 TECH 3 Staff Eng. PM SR Principal SUBTOTAL SUBTOTALLABORM. Skousen M.Hilbert S.Riggs A. McKinnon J.Beckman K. Larson M. CollinsHOURS COSTHourly Rate$67.00 $67.00 $81.00 $98.00 $110.00 $150.00 $150.00 $145.00 Task 1 - Collect, Review, and Organize DataReview available information426$740Kickoff meeting8816$2,400Task 2 - Evaluate Current and Projected Sewer Production PatternsEvaluate current sewer production patterns10212$1,400Examine land use based on the City's general plan426$740Consider redevelopment and annexation22$220Project future sewer production82212$1,480Task 3 - Hydraulic Model of Existing Collection SystemDevelop collection system model36339$4,410Develop demand patterns and peaking factors819$1,030Calibrate the models based on available system data24226$2,940Flow Monitoring24226$2,940Task 4 - Identify Existing DeficienciesSimulate existing operating conditions and identify deficiencies617$810Work with City staff to identify improvements to mitigate deficiencies 163827$3,410Evaluate various scenarios126321$2,670Task 5 - Identify Future DeficienciesCreate future production scenarios in model16117$1,910Simulate future operating conditions and identify deficiencies415$590Task 6 - Evaluate Improvements to Address DeficienciesEvaluate improvement alternatives12315$1,770Select recommended improvements83314$1,780Cost estimates and prioritized list of improvements with implementation year8311$1,330Task 7 - Develop Capital Facilities PlanDevelop Prioritization Criteria448$1,040Develop detailed 10 year Capital Facilities Plan and Budget44162228$2,896Prioritize improvements that are outside 10 year plan314$480Task 8 - Document Results Draft report4 6 40 12 12 74 $8,670 Review comments8 8 8 24 $3,280 Final Report4 4 16 6 8 38 $4,396TOTAL LABOR12 14 0 0 289 70 62 0 447 $53,332TOTAL LABOR COSTS $804 $938 $0 $0 $31,790 $10,500 $9,300 $0 $53,332EXPENSESItemUnit RateTotal CostExpenses include:COMMUNICATION/COMPUTER$3,129 $7/hr communications/computer chargeGEOTECHNICAL$0 Mileage reimbursement at $0.75/milePRINTING /GRAPHICS$300 10% Markup on Outside ServicesAUTO MILEAGE864 $0.75 $648AIRFARE8 $150.00 $1,200MISC EXPENSES$35FLOW MONITORING1$21,156$21,156TOTAL LABOR COST$53,332 TOTAL EXPENSES$26,468EXPENSES$26,468TOTAL COST$79,800ENGINEERSBowen, Collins Associates 11:16 AM11/4/2016 Engineering Fee - Sewer Master PlanPage 239 of 295 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 28, 2017 Agenda Item #: 8-6 Title: Approval of Task Order #17-05 with Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. accepting the Scope of Work for the Moab WRF Materials Testing project with a fee amount not to exceed $40,888 Fiscal Impact: $40,888 Staff Presenter(s): Phillip M. Bowman, P.E., City Engineer Department: Engineering Consultant: Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. (BCA) Background/Summary: This task order will allow Bowen Collins & Associates to manage and oversee a sub-consultant, Jones & DeMille Engineering, during the construction of the new WRF project. During the construction of the new WRF project, the City will need to have quality assurance testing performed on the placement of various construction materials. Bowen Collins will need to coordinate and oversee this testing, but does not have the laboratory facilities to self-perform these tests. The required testing will be performed through the use of a sub-consultant, Jones & DeMille Engineering, and will include concrete testing, trench backfill testing, and asphalt testing. The testing performed will confirm the project is constructed according to the plans and specifications, and will ensure the work done by the contractor is acceptable. This Task Order is budgeted for in Fiscal Year 2017 as part of the “Impact Project/Sewer – WRF Construction” in the Capital Budget of the Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund. Options: The Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny, or postpone the item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Task Order. Page 240 of 295 Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Task Order #17-05 with Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc., accepting the Scope of Work for the Moab WRF Materials Testing project with a fee amount not to exceed $40,888.” Attachments: Task Order 17-05, with Scope of Work and Fee Estimate Page 241 of 295 Page 242 of 295 Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS TASK ORDER N0.17-05 TO MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OWNER: City of Moab Utah Effective Date of Master Agreement: April 22, 2014 THIS TASK ORDER NO. 17-05 TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (this "TASK ORDER") is made and entered into as of the __ day of 2017, by and between City of Moab, Utah (herein called OWNER) and Bowen, Collins and Associates, Inc., a Utah Corporation (herein called ENGINEER) who agree as follows: l. PROJECT. The PROJECT associated with this TASK ORDER is described as follows: Moab WRF Materials T es ting. The PROJECT SITE is the City of Moab, Utah. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The SCOPE OF SERVICES and deliverables associated with this TASK ORDER is defined in the attachment A. 3. FEES. OWNER shall reimburse for services provided under this TASK ORDER on a time and expense basis not to exceed $40,888.00. Payment shall be in accordance with the FEE SCHEDULE included in the and in accordance with the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. 4. SCHEDULE. The SERVICES associated with this TASK ORDER are anticipated to be completed within eight weeks after receiving authorization to proceed. 5. ATTACHMENTS AND EXHIBITS. Both parties have read and understood all attachments and exhibits referenced in or attached to this TASK ORDER and agree that such items are hereby incorporated into and made a part of the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER and ENGINEER have executed this TASK ORDER as of the date first above written. CITY OF MOAB, UTAH (OWNER) BOWEN, COLLINS & ASSOCIATES (ENGINEER) By: __________ By: ~ t ~ /\(S ~ Printed Name:--------------Printed Name: L14.v) e · ~~ {ey Its: ____ ...... B_.f~--'-;~---------lts : ----------------- EXHIBIT A TASK ORDER 17-05 SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR MOAB WRF MATERIALS TESTING SCOPE Bowen Collins & Associates (BC&A) has been retained by the City of Moab (Moab) to provide construction period services for the Moab Water Reclamation Facility. These services include submittal review, construction observation, coordination with the contractor and other services as outlined in the previously approved Task Order. Moab has requested that BC&A also provide quality assurance construction materials testing services for the construction period. BC&A will contract with Jones & DeMille Engineering to perform the material sampling and laboratory analyses. BC&A will coordinate the testing frequency with the Contractor and the materials testing firm. The materials testing will include concrete strength tests and soil density testing. The scope and fee is based upon the assumptions: 1. Density Testing – 10 trips for density testing with approximately 8-10 tests per trip. 2. Concrete Field Testing – 35 trips for field concrete testing with 5 concrete cylinders and breaks for each trip. 3. Additional Materials testing – It is assumed that 5 proctors, and 5 gradations will be needed through the course of this project. 4. Testing Coordination The follow table summarizes the total fee associated with material testing services. The fee is based upon an estimated number of tests. The actual number of tests required will be based upon the contractor’s means and methods. Page 243 of 295 Exhibit B - Task Order 17-05WRF Materials TestingEngineering Man-Hour and Fee EstimatePrepared by Bowen, Collins and Associates Subtotal HoursSubtotal Labor SubcontractorSubtotalExpenses Total CostLabor CategorySen. Review Proj. Mngr. Const. Insp CAD AdminStaffMayers Beckman Thompson Staff StaffLabor Rate$135 $145 $145 $110 $64Task No. Task Description1 Contract Management88512$ 56$ 568$ 2 Coordination28101,450$ 370$ 1,820$ 3 Materials Testing38,500$ 38,500$ 38,500$ -$ TOTALS0280 8 18 1,962.00$ 38,500.00$ 38,926.00$ 40,888.00$ Notes:Subcontractor includes 10% markup.Expenses include:Mileage reimbursement at $0.75/mileComputer/Communications Charge at $7.00/labor hour10% Markup on other project related expensesPersonnel (Billing Rates for Calendar Year 2016)Page 244 of 295 Feb 22, 2017 Jeff Beckman Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. 154 E 14000 S Draper, UT. 84020 Re: Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. – Moab WWTP Materials Testing Proposal Mr. Beckman: We appreciate the opportunity to provide a proposal for this project. Jones & DeMille Engineering (J&DE) has the necessary resources and expertise to complete the materials testing for your project in an efficient and timely manner. Because of our fully operational materials testing lab in Monticello and having qualified personnel and testing equipment already in place, we feel we can accommodate your needs effectively. The proposed scope of work and associated schedule and fees are as follows: SCOPE OF WORK Materials testing on an as needed basis, including but not limited to: 1. Density Testing – 10 trips for density testing with approximately 8-10 tests per trip. 2. Concrete Field Testing – 35 trips for field concrete testing with 5 concrete cylinders and breaks for each trip. 3. Additional Materials testing – It is assumed that 2 proctors, and 2 gradations will be needed through the course of this project. 4. Testing Coordination We can also provide soil classifications and special inspections for soils. All our field technicians are ACI certified so we can take care of any concrete testing needs. SCHEDULE J&DE has the resources in place now to assist Bowen Collins with their testing needs. Our materials lab is fully operational in Monticello. This will help us to be very efficient by eliminating unnecessary travel expenses in providing testing for this project. Our other ongoing projects in the area will allow us to provide testing on an as-needed basis, eliminating the need to pay for full time testing when not required. Having personnel in place will also allow us to split travel costs with other projects if additional personnel are needed to meet your project’s critical time frames. Our technicians are trained to perform any of the field tests listed above. Any occasion that separate testing can be combined into one trip will reduce the estimated cost. MATERIAL TESTING FEES The foregoing scope of work for materials testing services can be completed pursuant to our standard hourly and t esting rates for an estimated amount of $35,000. The following is a breakdown of how the tests will be billed. The most likely rates to be used are highlighted in the attachment below. Page 245 of 295 1. Density Testing for 10 trips – Personnel hourly rate, and mileage. About $600 per trip including tech time, drive time from Monticello, and mileage. Estimated total of $6,000. 2. Concrete Testing for 35 trips – Personnel hourly rate, mileage, and $20.00 per concrete cylinder. Estimated amount assumes 35 sets of cylinders will be taken on 35 separate trips. The cost to sample the concrete is about $600 per trip which includes tech time, drive time from Monticello and mileage. Estimated total of $28,000. 3. Additional Materials testing – 2 proctors and 2 gradations. One trip to collect samples, with the remaining samples being collected during other testing trips. Estimated total of $1,000. 4. Project Management/reporting – Personnel hourly rate, mileage, and per diem as needed. Additional services can be provided at the Client’s request according to our attached Standard Hourly Rates. Assumptions and Limitations: 1. Concrete cylinders will need to be collected within 48 hours after casting as part of planned concrete or density testing trips. If the schedule require s special trips for cylinder collection, hourly rate and mileage charges will apply. 2. Estimated total cost is based on a “high level estimate” for materials testing provided by Bowen Collins and Associates. Any adjustments to the total estimated number of tests will change the total estimated amount accordingly. 3. Although proctors and gradations were not included in the provided estimated numbers, we have assumed 5 of each for the project. We have been providing materials testing for the earthwork portion of the treatment plant contract and have completed some testing on the material used. These tests may be usable for the construction phase, but there is no certainty. CLOSURE We appreciate and look forward to the opportunity to work with you on this project. Our team has the proven capabilities to complete this work in a timely and efficient manner. Please review this proposal and let us know if there are any questions or con cerns. Sincerely, JONES & DEMILLE ENGINEERING, INC. Ryan Jolley, PE Principal Attachment Page 246 of 295 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 28, 2017 Agenda Item #: 8-7 Title: Approval of Task Order #380.09.100 with Hansen, Allen and Luce, Inc. accepting the Scope of Work for the Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan project with a fee amount not to exceed $68,000 Fiscal Impact: $68,000 Staff Presenter(s): Phillip M. Bowman, P.E., City Engineer Department: Engineering Consultant: Hansen, Allen and Luce, Inc. Background/Summary: This task order will allow Hansen, Allen and Luce, Inc. (HAL) to prepare a Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan for the culinary water system within the City. The completion of a Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan will include fire hydrant flow and pressure testing in our existing distribution system, computer modeling of the storage tanks and distribution system, and analysis of the system improvements needed now and in the future. One of the items created with this study will be the Capital Facilities Plan that will identify a prioritized list of capital projects needed for water storage tanks and the water distribution system. The Capital Facilities Plan will help the City plan and budget for future projects, and identify the time frames that these projects should be completed within. In addition, the completion of the Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan will help the City apply for and secure grants and loans for the project needs identified in the Capital Facilities Plan. This Task Order is budgeted for in Fiscal Year 2017 as part of the “Impact Project/Water – Storage and Distribution Master Plan” in the Capital Budget of the Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund. Options: The Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny, or postpone the item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Task Order. Page 247 of 295 Recommended Motion: “"I move to approve Task Order # 380.09.100 with Hansen, Allen and Luce, Inc., accepting the Scope of Work for the Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan project with a fee amount not to exceed $68,000." Attachments: Task Order 380.09.100, with Scope of Work and Fee Estimate Page 248 of 295 Page 249 of 295 Attac hme nt A TASK ORDER NO. 380.09.100 TO MASTER AGREEM ENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVI C ES OWNER: CITY OF MOAB Effective Date of Agreement: _________ _ THIS TASK ORDER NO. 380.09.100 ("this TASK ORDER") to the CITY OF MOAB MAST ER AGREEMENT FOR P ROFESSIONAL SERVICES (AGREEMENT ) is made and entered into as of the __ day of , 20_, by and between OWNER and HANSEN, ALL EN & LUCE, INC ., a Utah Corporation (herein called ENG INEER) who agree as follows: 1. PROJECT. The PROJECT associated with th is TASK ORDER is described as follows: Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan 2. PROJECT SITE. The PROJECT SITE is locat ed as follows: City of Moab, Utah 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The SCOPE OF SERVICES and deliverables associated with this TASK ORDER are attached hereto as Exhibit A. 4. FEES. OWNER shall reimburse for services provided under this TASK ORDER on a time and expense basis not to exceed $ 60,000 . Payment shall be in accordance with the FEE SCHEDULE attached hereto as Exhibit Band in accordance with the AGREEMENT . Additional tasks are identified in the SCOPE OF S ERVICES with a time and expense basis fee not to exceed $ 8 1000 which tasks will not be performed until ENGI N EER receives written approval from the OWNER. 5. SCHEDULE. The S ERVICES associated with this TASK ORDER are anticipated to be completed within 180 calendar days fo ll owing written authorization from the OWN ER to proceed. 6. ATTACHMENTS AND EXHIBITS. Both parties have read and understood all attachments and exhibits referenced in or attached to th is TASK ORDER and agree that such i tems are hereby incorporated into and made part of the AGREEMENT. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNE R and ENGINEER have executed this TASK ORDER as of the date first above written . OWNER: ENGINEER: By: By ~ o .. ntt1, Printed Name: ue~Jt?--11,\.,Y'\ v · 1v1ev-Printed Name : ---------- Its: Its: Page 250 of 295 HllRSER llLLER &LUCEmc ENGINEERS Mr. Phillip Bowman , P.E. Moab C ity Engineer 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 SALT LAKE AREA OFFICE 677 sour 90C E,-,ST 'v11D ALE u TAf, 840J 7 ::>1-<Qt:: 80 1 ) 566 5599 FAX 801 566 5581 February 23, 2017 RE: Proposal -City of Moab -Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan Task Order No.: 380.09.100 Dear Phillip: We are pleased to provide you with a proposal for a Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan for the City of Moab. The master plan will provide an evaluation of the existing City culinary water system, as wel l as providing guidance for future growth. The master plan will provide a list of any existing system deficiencies, and it will provide a list of facilities anticipated for the future. Costs will be provided for anticipated infrastructure. As we discussed a few days ago, the master plan will provide a technical des ign basis for construction of the proposed new water tank. This wi ll he lp secure funding for the tank since the necessity of the tank can be justified to funding agencies. However, if you des ire to proceed with the tank before completing the master plan, we anticipate that adequate documentation can be provided with a design report based on the modeling work that we have already performed. If desired, we can assist with the preparation of user rate fees and/or impact fees, including the required capital facilities plans (CFP), impact fee facilities plan (IFFP), and the impact fee analysis (IFA). Steve Jones is a leading expert in impact fees , having worked closely with Jodi Hoffman (Land Use Attorney for the League of Cities and Towns) and having participated in the Land Use Task Force sponsored by the League. We have significant experience with preparing CFPs , IFFPs and IFAs in accordance with Utah Code using proven methods that are legally defensible. We can provide you with study examples if you would like. You mentioned that Keith Larson (Bowen & Collins) would likely be asked to prepare the above noted financial studies . We have worked extensively with Keith, and we wou ld be glad to coordinate with him as needed. Attached , please find a scope of work and fee estimate for the water distribution and storage master plan. Please call with any questions. f N G I N N G [XCELLEN S I N E: I 4 Page 251 of 295 Mr. Phillip Bowman February 23 , 2017 Page 2 of 2 Sincerely, HANSEN, ALLEN & LUCE , INC. Benjamin D. Miner, P .E. Principal Page 252 of 295 WATER DISTRIBUTION AND STORAGE MASTER PLAN BAC KGROUND AND SCOPE OF SERVICES EX HIBIT A BAC KGRO UND The City has requested assistance in developing a wa ter d istribution and storage master plan to help identify the condition of existing infrastructure and to guide the City plan for future demands on the water system . The capital improvement plan that is produced as part of the master plan will provide the City with a list of needed projects and estimated costs . The following scope of work was prepared to define the level of engineering assistance needed. SCOPE OF WORK The suggested scope of work is outlined by Task and Subtask below. Tasks: 1 . Collect, Re view , and Organize Data a . Review the existing water model , water related reports and other information that will be provided by Moab City. b. Participate in conference ca ll with the City to review the project objectives and schedule, develop project and data coordination procedures, and discuss questions regarding information provided by the City . c. Provide regular project management and progress coord ina t ion conference calls. It is anticipated that these calls with be he ld at least month ly. d . Perfo rm a review of the City's existing wate r engineering standa rds as related to the water distribu ti on and storage master plan. 2. Task 2 -Evaluate Current Water Use Patterns and Project Future Use a. Based on water available water use records , evaluate current water use patterns in Moab C ity. This w ill include a review of how much wa ter use occurs indoors vs. outdoors. A review wi ll performed of average historical water use by user type , peaking factors, seasonal use patterns , and the effect of conservation . If needed , parameters will be estimated based on sta te rules and typical va lues in Utah after consultation with the City. b . Using the City's land use p lan , prepare future de mand projections . Participate in a conference call with the C ity to review t he demand projections and methods for implementing the demands in the EPANET 2 .0 model. c. Develop projected demands for Moab through build-out based on the combined results of the activities described above. Exhibit 6 Page 1 Page 253 of 295 E X HIBIT A 3. Eva lua te Ex is ting a nd Future W a ter Su ppl y a nd Storag e a. Participate in a conference ca ll w ith City personnel to discuss existing supply production and future supply alternatives. b. Evaluate the adequacy of City sources to meet projected demands based on State Standards, including consideration of the effects of conservation , outdoor water use, and water rights. c. Evaluate the adequacy of City storage facilities to meet existing and future demand based on State Standards. d . Evaluate the adequacy of City sources to meet projected peak demands. This will include consideration of the capacity of individual sources and storage during peak demand periods . 4 . Upd ate and Cali brate Existi ng Hydrau li c Model a nd Update t he Buil d-Out Sce na rio a . Use data obtained from completing Task 1 and 2 to develop an updated extended period computer model of the Moab water distribution system. b. Use ava il able system operationa l data to calibrate the hydraulic model to simulate field conditions. The City will provide avai lable SCADA data and will perform fire hydrant flow tests with assistance from HAL. c. Prepare the build-out scenario in the model based on information from Tasks 1, 2 and 3. 5. Ident ify Existi ng Opera t ing Defi ciencies a. Use the computer model to simu late operating conditions of the existing water system under peak day demand conditions wi th added f ire flow demands defined by City personnel through various locations in the distribution system . Review computer output from the existing -condition model simulations to determine if the existing facilities (including conveyance , pumping , and storage facilities) meet recommended operating criteria. Recommended operating criteria w ill be based on minimum State criteria and consu ltant's recommendations based on experience with other water systems . Identify faci li ties that do not meet the desired operating criteria. b. Utilize information provided from City operations personnel to identify condition-related improvements that need to be implemented in the water system to mitigate existing problems. c . Prepare a list of existing system deficiencies. Exhibi t ~ Page 2 Page 254 of 295 EXHIBIT A 6. Identify Projected Future Operating Deficiencies a. Use the computer model to simu late operating conditions of the existing water system facilities under projected future demands as well as projected future peak day demand condit ions w ith added fire flow demands provided by City personnel distributed in various locations throughout the water system . Review computer ou tput from the mode l simulations and identify facilities that do not meet desired operati ng criteria . b. Eva luate the adequacy of existing water supply sources and water storage facilities to meet the future needs imposed on the water system. c. Prepare a list of the deficiencies caused by future growth through build-out. 7. Water System Optimization a . Obtain power costs, source water costs , and water quality data from the City to perform a water system optimization analysis . b. Use the model to understand and simulate the current operation procedures of the water distribution system. c . Analyze system facilities to determine areas of potential system operation and performance improvements. Use the model to analyze the current electricity use of the water distribution system during varying demand conditions. Use the model to understand and simulate the current sys tem efficiency and water qua li ty of the water distribution system during varying demand conditions. Identify inefficiencies and deve lop ways of potent ially improving the system pe rformance , energy efficiency, and water qual ity of the water distribution system. d. Prepa re an updated system schematic and system balance model by pressure zone to aid in the system optimization ana lysis. e. Assist the City in partic ipating Rocky Mountain Powe r's Watt Smart program to take advantage of financial incen tives fo r the wa ter system to be more energy efficient. It is anticipated that this item will be paid through the Watt Smart program and depends on funding approval. 8. Evaluate Improvements to Resol ve Id entifi ed Operating Deficiencies and Inefficiencies a. Util ize the computer mode l to evaluate alternative water system improvements to resolve the system deficiencies and operational inefficiencies. b. Meet w ith City personne l to identify the recommended water system capital improvement projects that will best resolve the identified system deficiencies. c . Deve lop cost estimates for the recommended system improvements. Exh ibit 6 Page 3 Page 255 of 295 EXHIBIT A 9. Develop W ater System Capital Fac il ities Plan a. Coordinate with City personnel to develop prioritization criteria for recommended water system improvement projects. Prioritize recommended capital improvement projects based on whether needed improvements are to correct existing deficiencies or associated with future development and the other prioritization criteria developed wi th City personnel. b. Deve lop a detailed project schedule by year based on priority and need. Identify projects that are eligible to receive fund ing from impact fees. 10. Repo rt Prepa rati o n a. Prepare a draft report that summarizes the results of the study and presents the recommended water system capital improvements plan. b. Hold a conference call with City personnel to review comments on draft report. c. Provide public involvement by presenting the report at a City Council meeting and receive comments from council members and the public. d. Incorporate City comments into the final report. Provide 3 hard copies and an electronic copy of the final report e. Provide a complete and functional EPANET 2.0 mode l of the existing and ful l build-out scenarios. f. Assist City with submittal of the master plan and mode l to the Division of Drinking Water. 11. M odel Trainin g a. Provide 4 hours of training to City staff with the updated model includ ing functionality, data management, and methodologies. Provide operator and engineer training of recommended system optimization changes. It is antic ipated tha t the 4 hours of training will be provided during one of the other visits to reduce redundant transportation costs. 12. Additio na l Tasks a. Participate in pub lic invo lvement planning with the City with the creation of a public involvement strategy. HAL's involvement will be via phone, Skype and/or email. b. Develop a webs ite access ible by the pub li c which addresses key po ints and issues that includes updates during the duration of the project. This webs ite w ill allow public feedback. c. Assist in the assembly of a loca l comm ittee formed of key stakeholders through phone calls, emails and discussion with City Staff. d. Participate in one stakeholder meeting in Moab, inc luding preparation and de livery of presentations. Exhibit 6 Page 4 Page 256 of 295 EXHIBIT A E STIMATED FEE HAL proposes a "not to exceed " engineering budget of $60 ,000 for the completion of the Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan as outlined in this task order with an additional budget of $8 ,000 to perform the Additional Tasks identified in the scope of services which will not be performed until we receive written approval from the City. See the attached spreadsheet for a detailed cost calculation . Assumptions upon which the above estimated fee is based are as follows: • We wi ll use the existing hydraulic model that we have as a starting point for the plan. • The City will provide other necessary data in a time ly manner. • DOW may provide a planning grant (HAL will coordinate). • The City will perform fire flow testing with assistance from HAL. HAL will provide a fire f low meter is needed . • RMP 's wattsmart Business program may provide funding for analysis of energy-efficient capital projects. • The cost estimate and scope may be revised after funding and other resources are determined. • Two meetings at City offices, one city council meeting , with additional meetings he ld via video con ferencing (one stakeholder meeting in additional tasks) • The master plan doesn 't include an in-depth review of water rights . • Electronic copy (PDF) of the draft report. • T hree hard copies and one electronic copy (PD F) of the final report. Exhibit ~ Page 5 STANDARD FEE SCHEDULE 2017 PERSONNEL CHARGES Client agrees to reimburse Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc. (HAL), for personnel expenses directly related to the completion of the project, in accordance with the following: Senior Managing Professional ......................................................................... $177.00/hr Managing Professional .................................................................................... $151.95/hr Senior Professional II ......................................................................................... $141.00/hr Senior Professional I .......................................................................................... $132.15/hr Professional III .................................................................................................... $120.20/hr Professional II ..................................................................................................... $110.00/hr Professional I ...................................................................................................... $102.20/hr Professional Intern ............................................................................................... $92.30/hr Engineering Student Intern ................................................................................ $47.90/hr Senior Designer ................................................................................................... $98.60/hr Senior Field Technician .................................................................................... $100.50/hr Field Technician .................................................................................................. $80.15/hr CAD Operator ..................................................................................................... $80.15/hr Secretary .............................................................................................................. $58.95/hr Professional Land Surveyor .............................................................................. $113.30/hr 1 Man GPS Surveying Services – Surveying Technician ............................... $100.50/hr 1 Man GPS Surveying Services - PLS ............................................................... $133.90/hr 2 Man GPS Surveying Services - PLS ............................................................... $149.30/hr Expert Legal Services ....................................................................................... $280.00/hr DIRECT CHARGES Client also agrees to reimburse HAL for all other costs directly related to the completion of the project. Direct charges shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Communication, Computer, Reproduction ................................ $6.00 per labor hour Out-of-town per diem allowance (lodging not included) ................. $35.00 per day Vehicle ......................................................................................................... $0.65 per mile Outside consulting and services ................................................................ Cost plus 10% Other direct expenses incurred during the project ................................ Cost plus 10% Trimble GPS Unit ...................................................................................... $130.00 per day Drone Unit ................................................ $500.00 per day plus data conversion costs Data Logger/Transducer ..................................................................... $125.00 per week INTEREST CHARGE AFTER 30 DAYS FROM INVOICE DATE ................................ 1.5% per month Note: Annual adjustments to personnel and direct expense charges will occur in January of each year. Mileage rate changes are based on fuel prices. Page 257 of 295 PROJECT: Hours Communications Miles Direct Expense Principal Manging Prof. Sr Prof II Sr Prof I Prof II Prof I Field Tech Secretary /Office Expense Travel Expense Cost SCJ RTC MCP I 100 Project management 1 6.6 6.6 $930.60 $39.60 39.60 $970.20 101 Obtain and review data from City & identify data needs 1 4.4 4.4 8.8 $1,070.08 $52.80 52.80 $1,122.88 102 Project kickoff conference call 1 3.3 1.1 4.4 $577.72 $26.40 26.40 $604.12 103 Project Coordination Meetings 1 6.6 4.4 11 $1,380.28 $66.00 66.00 $1,446.28 104 Review City drinking water engineering standards 1 1.1 6.6 7.7 $829.62 $46.20 46.20 $875.82 199 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 1.1 1.1 $155.10 $6.60 6.60 $161.70 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 23.1 0 0 16.5 0 0 39.6 0 0 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $3,257.10 $0.00 $0.00 $1,686.30 $0.00 $0.00 $4,943.40 $237.60 $0.00 $0.00 $237.60 $5,181.00 Outside / Subconsultant Costs II 200 Review water use data and demands 1 2.2 5.5 7.7 $872.30 $46.20 46.20 $918.50 201 Prepare future demand projections 1 2.2 8.8 11 $1,209.56 $66.00 66.00 $1,275.56 202 Develop updated demands 1 2.2 17.6 19.8 $2,108.92 $118.80 118.80 $2,227.72 299 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 1.1 1.1 $155.10 $6.60 6.60 $161.70 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 7.7 0 0 31.9 0 0 39.6 0 0 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $1,085.70 $0.00 $0.00 $3,260.18 $0.00 $0.00 $4,345.88 $237.60 $0.00 $0.00 $237.60 $4,583.48 Outside / Subconsultant Costs III 300 Participate in a conference call with City personnel to discuss water supply and storage 1 2.2 1.1 3.3 $422.62 $19.80 19.80 $442.42 301 Evaluate adequacy of supply sources 1 1.1 3.3 4.4 $492.36 $26.40 26.40 $518.76 302 Evaluate adequacy of storage 1 1.1 3.3 4.4 $492.36 $26.40 26.40 $518.76 303 Evaluate adequacy of sources and storage to future meet peak demand 1 1.1 3.3 4.4 $492.36 $26.40 26.40 $518.76 399 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 1.1 1.1 $155.10 $6.60 6.60 $161.70 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 6.6 0 0 11 0 0 17.6 0 0 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $930.60 $0.00 $0.00 $1,124.20 $0.00 $0.00 $2,054.80 $105.60 $0.00 $0.00 $105.60 $2,160.40 Outside / Subconsultant Costs IV 400 Update hydraulic model of the water distribution system 1 6.6 17.6 24.2 $2,729.32 $145.20 145.20 $2,874.52 401 Calibrate the hydraulic model using system operational data to match field conditions 1 6.6 17.6 24.2 $2,729.32 $145.20 145.20 $2,874.52 402 Update the build-out scenario 1 4.4 17.6 22 $2,419.12 $132.00 132.00 $2,551.12 499 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 1.7 1.65 $232.65 $9.90 9.90 $242.55 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 19.25 0 0 52.8 0 0 72.05 0 0 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $2,714.25 $0.00 $0.00 $5,396.16 $0.00 $0.00 $8,110.41 $432.30 $0.00 $0.00 $432.30 $8,542.71 Outside / Subconsultant Costs V 500 Use the computer model to identify system deficiencies under existing conditions.1 8.8 13.2 22 $2,589.84 $132.00 132.00 $2,721.84 501 Identify condition-related improvements to mitigate existing problems 1 2.2 2.2 4.4 $535.04 $26.40 26.40 $561.44 502 Prepare list of existing system deficiencies 1 1.1 6.6 7.7 $829.62 $46.20 46.20 $875.82 599 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 1.7 1.65 $232.65 $9.90 9.90 $242.55 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 13.75 0 0 22 0 0 35.75 0 0 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $1,938.75 $0.00 $0.00 $2,248.40 $0.00 $0.00 $4,187.15 $214.50 $0.00 $0.00 $214.50 $4,401.65 Outside / Subconsultant Costs Total HAL Cost HAL PROPOSAL SPREADSHEET CLIENT:City of Moab Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan Collect, Review, and Organize Data Evaluate Current Use and Projected Water Use Evaluate Existing and Future Water Supply and Storage Update and Calibrate Model of the Existing Water Distribution System and Update the Build-Out Scenario Identify Existing Operating Deficiencies Task #Pha COMMENTTotal Hours Labor Costs Billing PeriodTask Activity Page 258 of 295 Hours Communications Miles Direct Expense Principal Manging Prof. Sr Prof II Sr Prof I Prof II Prof I Field Tech Secretary /Office Expense Travel Expense Cost SCJ RTC MCP Total HAL CostTask #Pha COMMENTTotal Hours Labor Costs Billing PeriodTask Activity VI 600 Use the computer model to identify system deficiencies under build-out conditions.1 2.2 6.6 8.8 $984.72 $52.80 52.80 $1,037.52 601 Identify condition-related improvements to mitigate future problems 1 4.4 8.8 13.2 $1,519.76 $79.20 79.20 $1,598.96 602 Prepare list of system deficiencies caused by future growth 1 1.1 4.4 5.5 $604.78 $33.00 33.00 $637.78 699 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 1.7 1.65 $232.65 $9.90 9.90 $242.55 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 9.35 0 0 19.8 0 0 29.15 0 0 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $1,318.35 $0.00 $0.00 $2,023.56 $0.00 $0.00 $3,341.91 $174.90 $0.00 $0.00 $174.90 $3,516.81 Outside / Subconsultant Costs VII 700 Obtain system optimization data 1 4.4 4.4 8.8 $1,070.08 $52.80 52.80 $1,122.88 701 Model existing system operation procedures 1 4.4 4.4 8.8 $1,070.08 $52.80 52.80 $1,122.88 702 Analyze system for system performance inefficiencies 1 4.4 6.6 11 $1,294.92 $66.00 66.00 $1,360.92 703 Analyze system for energy inefficiencies 1 2.2 4.4 6.6 $759.88 $39.60 39.60 $799.48 704 Analyze system for water quality inefficiencies 1 4.4 4.4 8.8 $1,070.08 $52.80 52.80 $1,122.88 705 Develop solutions to system optimization inefficiencies 1 4.4 6.6 11 $1,294.92 $66.00 66.00 $1,360.92 706 Update system schematic and prepare system balance model 1 4.4 6.6 11 $1,294.92 $66.00 66.00 $1,360.92 707 Rocky Mountain Power Watt Smart program 1 0 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 799 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 2.2 2.2 $310.20 $13.20 13.20 $323.40 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 30.8 0 0 37.4 0 0 68.2 0 0 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $4,342.80 $0.00 $0.00 $3,822.28 $0.00 $0.00 $8,165.08 $409.20 $0.00 $0.00 $409.20 $8,574.28 Outside / Subconsultant Costs VIII 800 Use computer model to evaluate alternative solutions 1 1.1 1.1 $155.10 $6.60 6.60 $161.70 801 Identify preferred alternatives with City personnel 1 11.0 11.0 22 $2,675.20 $132.00 495 22 475.75 $3,150.95 802 Develop cost estimates of system improvements 1 2.2 4.4 6.6 $759.88 $39.60 39.60 $799.48 899 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 1.1 1.1 $155.10 $6.60 6.60 $161.70 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 15.4 0 0 15.4 0 0 30.8 495 22 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $2,171.40 $0.00 $0.00 $1,573.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,745.28 $184.80 $321.75 $22.00 $528.55 $4,273.83 Outside / Subconsultant Costs IX 900 Coordinate with City personnel to prioritize capital improvement projects 1 3.3 1.1 4.4 $586.30 $26.40 26.40 $612.70 901 Develop a prioritized project schedule 1 8.8 13.2 22 $2,692.80 $132.00 132.00 $2,824.80 999 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 1.7 1.65 $232.65 $9.90 9.90 $242.55 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 13.75 0 14.3 0 0 0 28.05 0 0 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $1,938.75 $0.00 $1,573.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,511.75 $168.30 $0.00 $0.00 $168.30 $3,680.05 Outside / Subconsultant Costs X 1000 Prepare a draft report 1 17.6 55.0 4.4 77 $8,361.98 $462.00 462.00 $8,823.98 1001 Hold a conference call with City personnel for review and comments 1 2.2 2.2 4.4 $535.04 $26.40 26.40 $561.44 1002 Present at City Council meeting 1 13.2 3.3 16.5 $2,198.46 $99.00 495 22 442.75 $2,641.21 1003 Prepare final report 1 4.4 4.4 8.8 $709.06 $52.80 55 107.80 $816.86 1004 Provide Water Model 1 1.1 2.2 3.3 $379.94 $19.80 19.80 $399.74 1005 Assist City in submitting master plan to the DDW 1 2.2 2.2 $310.20 $13.20 13.20 $323.40 1099 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 0 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 36.3 0 0 67.1 0 8.8 112.2 495 77 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $5,118.30 $0.00 $0.00 $6,857.62 $0.00 $518.76 $12,494.68 $673.20 $321.75 $77.00 $1,071.95 $13,566.63 Outside / Subconsultant Costs Evaluate Improvements to Resolve Deficiencies and Inefficiencies Identify Projected Future Operating Deficiencies Water System Optimization Develop a Water System Capital Facilities Plan Report Preparation Page 259 of 295 Hours Communications Miles Direct Expense Principal Manging Prof. Sr Prof II Sr Prof I Prof II Prof I Field Tech Secretary /Office Expense Travel Expense Cost SCJ RTC MCP Total HAL CostTask #Pha COMMENTTotal Hours Labor Costs Billing PeriodTask Activity XI 1100 Train City personnel 1 4.4 4.4 $620.40 $26.40 495 22 370.15 $990.55 1199 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 0 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 4.4 0 0 0 0 0 4.4 495 22 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $620.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $620.40 $26.40 $321.75 $22.00 $370.15 $990.55 Outside / Subconsultant Costs XII 1200 Participate in public involvement planning 1 3.3 3.3 $465.30 $19.80 19.80 $485.10 1201 Develop website for public 1 4.4 44.0 48.4 $4,147.00 $290.40 290.40 $4,437.40 1202 Assist in assembly of committee 1 4.4 4.4 $620.40 $26.40 26.40 $646.80 1203 Participate in one stakeholder meeting 1 13.2 2.2 15.4 $2,086.04 $92.40 495 22 436.15 $2,522.19 1299 Quality Control (QC) / Quality Assurance (QA)1 2.2 2.2 $310.20 $13.20 13.20 $323.40 SUBTOTAL HOURS/UNITS:0 0 27.5 0 0 2.2 44 0 73.7 495 22 SUBTOTAL:$0.00 $0.00 $3,877.50 $0.00 $0.00 $224.84 $3,526.60 $0.00 $7,628.94 $442.20 $321.75 $22.00 $785.95 $8,414.89 Outside / Subconsultant Costs TOTAL HOURS BY EMPLOYEE:0 0 176 0 14.3 273.9 0 8.8 Labor Direct Exp Subconsultant Costs Cost Costs I Collect, Review, and Organize Data $4,943.40 $237.60 $5,181.00 $0.00 $5,181.00 II Evaluate Current Use and Projected Water Use $4,345.88 $237.60 $4,583.48 $0.00 $4,583.48 III Evaluate Existing and Future Water Supply and Storage $2,054.80 $105.60 $2,160.40 $0.00 $2,160.40 IV Update and Calibrate Model of the Existing Water Distribution System and Update the Build-Out Scenario$8,110.41 $432.30 $8,542.71 $0.00 $8,542.71 V Identify Existing Operating Deficiencies $4,187.15 $214.50 $4,401.65 $0.00 $4,401.65 VI Identify Projected Future Operating Deficiencies $3,341.91 $174.90 $3,516.81 $0.00 $3,516.81 VII Water System Optimization $8,165.08 $409.20 $8,574.28 $0.00 $8,574.28 VIII Evaluate Improvements to Resolve Deficiencies and Inefficiencies$3,745.28 $528.55 $4,273.83 $0.00 $4,273.83 IX Develop a Water System Capital Facilities Plan $3,511.75 $168.30 $3,680.05 $0.00 $3,680.05 X Report Preparation $12,494.68 $1,071.95 $13,566.63 $0.00 $13,566.63 XI Model Training $620.40 $370.15 $990.55 $0.00 $990.55 XII Additional Tasks $7,628.94 $785.95 $8,414.89 $0.00 $8,414.89 TOTAL:$63,149.68 $4,736.60 $67,886.28 $0.00 $67,886.28 PHASE TASK SubTotalSubtotal Model Training Additional Tasks Page 260 of 295 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 28, 2017 Agenda Item #: 8-8 Title: Approval of Change Order #1 with Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants, Inc. accepting the additional scope of work for Geotechnical Consulting and Materials Testing Services at the WRF project with a fee amount not to exceed $15,500 Fiscal Impact: $15,500 Staff Presenter(s): Phillip M. Bowman, P.E., City Engineer Department: Engineering Contractor: Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants, Inc. (AGEC) Background/Summary: This Change Order is required due to the extension of time on the WRF Site Preparation Project, and address the costs of additional staff time and site visits incurred with the time extension. On February 14, 2017, the City Council approved Change Order #5 with Harrison Field Services, Inc. (HFS) to extend the duration of the Site Preparation Project by approximately one month. With this time extension, the length of time that HFS will be performing structural fill placement on the site was increased and there is additional time needed for AGEC staff to observe and test the placement of the fill material. AGEC staff have worked very closely with City staff, and have been able to decrease the amount of time spent at the project to about three days per week (instead of five days per week as originally planned). Even with this decrease of days spent at the project site, the overall amount of staff time required was still greater than originally estimated (based on the original shorter duration of the project). This Change Order will allow AGEC to spend the time necessary to complete the project, and perform the observations and testing needed for AGEC to provide the certification of fill placement at the completion of the project. The estimated cost is shown on the attached Contract Change Order #1 form and Change Order Letter prepared by AGEC. The total cost for Change Order #1 is $15,500.00, and the total contract amount for the project will now be increased to $46,500.00. The increased total contract amount is budgeted for in Fiscal Year 2017 as part of the “Impact Project/Sewer – WRF Construction” in the Capital Budget of the Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund. Page 261 of 295 Options: The Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny, or postpone the item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Change Order #1 with AGEC. Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Change Order #1 with Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants, Inc. accepting the scope of work for Geotechnical Consulting and Materials Testing Services at the WRF project with a fee amount not to exceed $15,500.00” Attachments: Contract Change Order #1 form Change Order Letter by AGEC Page 262 of 295 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Project: City of Moab – WRF Project Geotechnical Consulting and Materials Testing Services Date: February 28, 2017 Change Order No.: 1 To: Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants, Inc. You are hereby directed to comply with the following changes to this project: Item No. Description of Changes, Quantities, Units, Unit Prices, Change in Completion Schedule, etc. Decrease In Contract Price Increase In Contract Price CO # 1 Additional Testing and Observation Time $15,500.00 (Per AGEC Change Order Letter dated 2/23/2017) Change in contract price due to this Change Order: $0.00 $15,500.00 Total Decrease $0.00 Total Increase $15,500.00 Difference between Col. 3 & 4 $0.00 $15,500.00 Net increase or decrease $0.00 $15,500.00 The amount paid for Change Order # 1 shall be based on actual time (hours) spent on the project, with the total additional billings not to exceed $15,500.00. The sum of $ 15,500.00 is hereby added to the total contract price and the total adjusted contract price to date thereby is $ 46,500.00 . The time provided for completion of the work is extended to March 31, 2017 . This Document shall become an amendment to the contract & all provisions of the contract will apply hereto. Recommended: February 24, 2017 _ Phillip M. Bowman, City Engineer Date Approved by: David L. Sakrison, Mayor Date Attest: Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder Date Page 263 of 295 Page 264 of 295 AGec Applied GeoTech 600 WEST SANDY PARKWAY SANDY UT 84070 801-566-6399 801-566-6493(FAX) CHANGE ORDER DATE: February 23, 2017 PROJECT NO. 1160206 CHANGE ORDER NO. 001 Project: Water Reclamation Facility -Site Preparation Project Client: City of Moab Name: Phillip Bowman Contract Date: June 28, 2016 Address: 217 E. Center Street, Moab, UT The Client and AGEC agree to make the following changes in the Scope of Work required under the Agreement with the listed changes in the Contract Sum. All terms and conditions are described in the Agreement unless specifically stated otherwise. CHANGE IN SCOPE: Description of Change in the Work, Reason and List of Attachments: The schedule to complete the original scope of work was extended by the City and contractor. Therefore, the number of days AGEC was requested to provide construction observations and material testing services was increased. Based on the current information available, we anticipate providing these services through March 3, 2017. CHANGE IN FEE: A. Original Contract Amount .......... . 8. Previously Approved Fee Change(s) ... . C. Current Contract Amount (A + 8) D. This Fee Adjustment ............. . E. Revised Contract Amount (C + D) ... . $ 31,000 $ 0 $ 31,000 $ 15,500 $ 46,500 The Client's signature upon this Fee Adjustment is the Client's acknowledgment that AGEC is entitled to the adjustment in compensation as a result of the Change in the Work. Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants, Inc.: Client: By Christopher J. Beckman By _______________ _ Signature {[J/Z__lr:l~,~""=--Signature ____________ _ Date February 23, 2017 Date ______________ _ Page 265 of 295 EXHIBIT A APPLIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. MATERIALS ENGINEERING and SPECIAL INSPECTION FEE SCHEDULE INSPECTORS/TECHNICIANS/SPECIALISTS (ICC, NICET, AWS, ASNT & AC) Certified) Project Engineer •••••••••..•.....•.•••.•••• , , $126.00 -$200.00/hour Project Manager •.••.••••• , , •••••••. , •• , .• , , . $126.00 -$175.00/hour Materials Speclalfst .•.• , , , , , , , •. , , , , , •.• , • , , , .• , , , , , , • $125.00/hour Str. Steel/Flreprooflng/Selsmlc/Bulldlng Special Inspector .• , , $85.00/hour Concrete/Post Installed Anchor Special Inspector .• , . , .••• : • $75.00/hour Masonry Special Inspector •••••... , •..•...••. , , , , , , , , • , , $75.00/hour Soll Special Inspector .• , •. , . , ......•..... , • , , , , , , , , , , . . $65.00/hour Asphalt/Concrete/Solls Technician . , ..•.. , , , , , , , , , , , , , . . . $60.00/hour AGGREGATE Adherent Fines •••••• , • , ••••..•. , , . , , . , , • , , . , , , , , . . . . . . $25.00/test Clay Lumps and Friable Particles (ASTM C 142) Aggregate Coarse • , , •............ , . , ....... , . , , ... , . $45,00/test Fine Aggregate , .. , • , , , . , . , , , . , , . , . , , . , , , ........•.. , $45.00/test Carbonates •......•.. , . , , .. , .. , . , . , ....... , . , . , , , .•.. $100.00/test Durability Index Coarse Aggregate , ..•.......••.......•.•. , , , , , , , , , , , $76.00/test Fine Aggregate ..•.••••••.••.••.. , ....•• , , , , , , , , , • , •• $76.00/test Flat and Elongated Particles (Army Corps of Engineers CRD c 119) ••.• , •••.••••..• .-•• $40.00/test Fractured Faces, coarse Aggregate (AASHTO) •...••••..••. , , $30.00/test lightweight Particles (ASTM C 123) Coarse Aggregate ••.• , •..••.• , , , . , , , • , •... , , . , , ..••• $45.00/test Fine Aggregate •..•• , , •••••••••• , • , , . , • • • . • • • • . • • • • • • $45.00/test Los Angeles Abrasion Resistance Test 1-'!." maximum (ASTM c 131) ••••••.•• , , •••• , ••..••••• $140.00/test 3" maximum (ASTM C 535) ........ , . , , ............. , , $140.00/test Organic Impurities, Fine Aggregate (ASTM C 40) • , • , : , , , •.• , • $30.00/test Sand Equivalent (ASTM D 2419) .••••••.•.•••• , , • , .•.•••• , , $60,00/test Scratch Hardness, Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C 851) , , , , , ••• , , $27.00/test Sodium or Magnesium Sulfate Soundness (5 cycles ASTM C 88) Coarse Aggregate •• , , , , , , , , • , , •• , .• , , • , . , , , . , , , • , • • $100.00ftest Fine Aggregate •••••••• , • , , ••• , •••• , •••• , , •• , , . . . • . . $100.00ftest Specific Gravity and Absorption Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C 127) ••• , •.• , ••••••••••• , , , , $40.00ftest Fine Aggregate (ASTM C 128) •• , , , , ..••••• , , , , , , , , • , , , $45.00(test Unit Welght·and Voids (ASTM C 29) •• , , •••.•.••. , , , , , , ••• , , $25.00ftest Special Testing ••• , ••• , ••.••.•••• , , • , , •• , •. , Quotation upon request BITUMINOUS MATERIALS . Asphalt Content (Nuclear/Ignition) , , , , , , , , •... , , , , , , , , , , , •.. $65.00/ea Asphalt Retention , •• , •••.•••.•..•••••••......•••.••.• , $125.00/test Cores-ThlcknessfDensity ••.•.•.••• , , , •.. , ••• , • . • . . . . . . . . . $60.00fea Coating & Stripping Test (ASTM D 1664) ...•.•... , .• , .•••• , • $50.00ftest Extraction-Gradation (ASTM D 2172, C 136, C 117) ••......•.••. $95.00/ea Field Marshall (3 Briquets)(ASTM D 1559) ••.•••• , ... , •••..• , $300.00/ea Immersion Compression (ASTM D 1075) ......•....•...••.. , $800.00fea Marshall Mix Design (ASTM D 1569) ....•..•.•.. Quotation upon request Rice Method, Specific Gravity ..•..•..•••.•• , ••••• , • • . . • • . • $80.00/ea Specific Gravity -Asphalt Cement (ASTM D 70) ••.. , ........• $40.00/test Tensile Strength Ratio •• , ••• , , , , .•••....••••..••...•••. , $400.00/ea CONCRETE TESTING Chloride Ion Content (AASHTO T 260) , , • , , , , , •• , ••.....•• , , , $75.00/ea Compressive Strength -Cores (ASTM C 39, lab fee only) . • • • • • • $36.00/ea Concrete Cylinders (ASTM C 39, C 143, C 172, & C 231) ..•.•••• $12.00fea Flowable FIii Cylinders (cure, break & report) •••• , , • , ...••. , , , $35.00/ea Concrete Mix Design (compression), per trial mix , , , • , • , ••• , • $400.00/ea Concrete Mix Design (flexural), per trial mix , • • • • . . • . . • • • • • . • $445.00fea Concrete Mix Design Reviews •.•.•••••• , , , , , , , • , •• , • , , , • • • $90.00/ea Flexural Beams, set of three , • , ••••• , ••• , •••••..•••••••.•.. $90,00/set Flexural Beams -Contractor made (cure, break & report) , • , , • • • $32.00/ea Moisture Content Test •. , •••••.•• , • , , •••••••• , •..••• , • •.• . • $26.00/ea Shotcrete (Panel w/4 cores, ASTM C 1140) . , .•• , • , .••• , •••• , $240.00fea Shrinkage Beams (ASTM C 167, Cal 530) •.• , , ••• , .•..••..••• $65.00fea Time Set by Penetration (ASTM C403) [Ambient/Cold] •• , , .•••• $200.00fset Unit Welght!Yleld (ASTM C 138) ............................ $25.00fea FIREPROOFING AdheslonfCoheslon (ASTM E 736) ••• , , • , .•• , , • , ..• , •...• , , . Staff Rate Application Verification •••••..•.•.•••••...••.•••••••••••• Staff Rate Density of Sprayed on Fireproofing (ASTM E 605) •...••••.•• , , $40.00fea MASONRY Block: Compression (ASTM C 140) ••• , ........................ , $35.00/ea Absorption and moisture (ASTM C 140) ••••••• , •• , ••••• , ••• $35.00/ea Linear Shrinkage (AMA C 341) ...... , .... , • , •• , ..... , , .. , $35.00fea Linear Shrinkage (CMA C 426) •• , , ••••.••• , ••••••••. , , ••. $65.00/ea Tensile Strength (CMA) •••••••• , • , ••••..••..• , • , •••.•••• $45.00/ea Brick: Compression (ASTM C 67) ••.•.••••••..•.....••.•.••••• , $24.00fea Absorption, with saturation coefficient (ASTM C 67) .....••. , $30.00fea Modulus of Rupture (ASTM C 67) •••• , , •••...... , ....... , , $24.00fea Grout samples, compression (ASTM C 1019) .....•......•..... $20.00fea Prisms, Grouted or Hollow, compression (ASTM C 1314) •...•.•. $70.00/ea Mortar samples, compression •••.•.••..•... , •• , • , , •.•••••. , $12.00/ea MortarfGrout Samples -Contractor made (break, cure & report) ... $20.00fea In-Place Shear Test ••...•••••••••.•.. , , , , •.. : . Quotation upon request SOILS Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318), slngle point ••.••.. , . , • , , •••• $50.00ftest California Bearing Ratio ( ASTM D 1883) (1-point] , ••.. , ••..•.• $85.00ftest 1· point, with proctor & gradation •..• , , , , , .. , ..•...•.••. $195.00ftest Gradation Analysis (ASTM C 136, c 117) 2" plus material, down to #200 sieve ...•••..•••••• ; ••••.• $90.00/test 2" minus material, down to #200 sieve •••••••• , • , ••• , •••.• $60.00(test Percent less than #200 Sieve [wash only] ••.•.••••••..••.. $40.00ftest Grain Size Analysis [Hydrometer] ASTM D 422 •.•••• , • , , .••..• $70.00/test · Moisture Content (ASTM C 66) •..••••.•••••••• , , , , , , , • , ••.• $12,00ftest Proctor Modified or Standard (ASTM D 1657, D 698) •••. , .•• , •••• , $110.00/test Moisture/Density Relationship (Checkpoint) •• , , , , •• , •...••••• $50.00/test Sandcone (ASTM D 1566) 6" , , , , ••••••• , .•••••••••.•••• , •• , $25,00ftest Sandcone (ASTM D 1556) 12" .•.••••••• , • , , , , , ••.•..••• , •• , $40.00/test STRUCTURAL STEELIWELDING Torque Testing of High Strength Bolts •.•••••.••••••.••..•••• Staff Rate ASNT Ultrasonic , •• , ••••••• , , , , , , •••• , , , , , ••••••.•.. , •••• Staff Rate ASNT Dye Penetrant ••••••.••.••••..••••••...•••.• , •• , •••• Staff Rate ASNT Magnetic Particle ••.••. , •••..•••••.•.••..••••••••.•• Staff Rate Welder Certification ••••.••••••.••..••••..•.•. Quotation upon request SUMP SAMPLINGITESTING , Effluent ••••.••••• , •••••••• , •. , . • • • . • • • . . • . . . . • . • • • • $385.00fsample Solids , •• , • , , , • , • , , , , .• , •••••.....••..... , ...• , . , , . $315.00/sample Restaurant Effluent ...•••••• , •.•• , •••• , , , ..•.......•• $230.00/sample Restaurant Solids •••••••...•.....•..•.•...• , •.••...• $265.00fsample CORING SERVICES Coring Machine (Includes operator) ...••....•..•..••..... ,. .. $100.00/hr Diamond Drill Charge, 3" core • , •... , •.• , , .••..•.. , . • • • • • • • $3.00/lnch Diamond Drill Charge, 4" core , . • • • . . . • . . . . . . . • . . • • • • • • • . . . $~.00/lnch End Preparation of Core Sample •••.•.••••••••...•••••... , • $6,00fcore MISCELLANEOUS Engineering Services • , •••••.•••••• , ••••••• , •. Quotation upon request Special Consultation Services . , , •• , , • , • , , , , , , .• Quotation upon request Special Testing • , • , , , •• , • , , , , , • , ••••• , .-, , , , •• Quotation upon request Bolt Tension Testing . , ••• , , , , •••••••••• $76.00/hr wf$100 dally equip. fee Floor Flatness(Levelness (ASTM E 1155) [F Numbers] ••••.••• $0.05 sq. ft! CompllancefFlnal Inspection Report • , ••• , , , , , , •••• , • . $500.00 minimum Clerical Research/Processing , , , ••..••.. , , •• , ••••••.••• , , , • $60.00/hr Fax •• , . , , • , ••.•.•.•••••••• , ••••• , • , , , , •..•••• , , • • • • • • $2.00fsheet Vehlcle (2 wheel drive -to leave on project sites) •• , ••••••••••• $35.00/day Vehicle (4 wheel drive -to leave on project sites) .•.••• , •• , •••• $45.00/day· MIieage Charges (within SL County) , , , .• , ••• , ••••• , • • • • • • . $20.00/trip Mileage Charges (outside SL County) ••.••.•• , ••• , , • • • . • . • • • • $.65/mlle Reimbursable Expenses ••••• , • • • • • . . • • . . . . • • • • • • • . • . • • • . . . • . + 20% Lab Trailer on site .. , •• , •••••.•..• , •.•• , ••••• Quotation upon request BASIS OF CHARGES Work over 8 hours per day, andfor Saturday •...•...••• , ••••••. Rate x 1.5 Work over 12 hours, andfor Sunday & Holidays .••.•... , , , ••••• Rate x 2.0 All field services O to 2 hours ••••••••• , , •..•....•• , . . . . • • • • • 2 hours Stand-by Time or Canceled On Site •••••.•. , , , , . , . . . . . . • Standard Rate • $600.00 minimum less than 10,000 sq. ft. AGEC is an AASHTO Accredited Laboratory 'Prices are subject to change, REVISED 03/13/2016 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING  February 28, 2017          Agenda Item #: 8‐9    Title: Approval of Resolution #19‐2017 – A Resolution Approving the City  of Moab 2017‐18 Permanent Community Impact Board Comprehensive  Projects List  Fiscal Impact:   No immediate impact  Staff Presenter(s): David Everitt  Department: Administration  Applicant: Not Applicable    Background/Summary: The City of Moab adopts an updated CIB list each year.   While the City will not necessarily seek CIB funding for all projects on the list, it is  important that any potential projects be included on the County‐wide list. Based on each  CIB‐eligible entity’s submittal to Grand County, Grand County will submit a County‐wide  list to the AOG and the CIB.    Options: The City Council can vote to approve the resolution to reject it, to delay the  decision pending more information, or to approve the resolution with changes.    Staff Recommendation: I recommend that the City Council approve Resolution 19‐ 2017 as presented.    Recommended Motion: “ I move that we approve Resolution 19‐2017, as  presented.”    Attachment(s): Resolution #19‐2017  Page 266 of 295 Resolution #19-2017 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF MOAB 2017-2018 PERMANENT COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND BOARD (CIB) COMPREHENSIVE PROJECTS LIST WHEREAS, the City of Moab shall approve, on a yearly basis, the consolidated list of projects to be submitted and reviewed for CIB funding, and shall rate and approve funding priorities for all City projects submitted to the CIB for funding. NOW THEREFORE, we, the Governing Body of the City of Moab do hereby resolve to approve the Community Impact Board Fund (CIB) project list for 2017-2018 as follows: Applicant Priority Entity Project Description Estimated Total Cost Funding Sources CIB Request A Short Term Submittal: 2017 City of Moab Stewart Canyon/Hwy 191 Drainage Improvements $6,000,000 City/ Division of Water Quality/CIB/ UDOT $3,000,000 ( grant/loan) A Short Term Submittal:2018 City of Moab Water Storage Tank and Transmission Line Improvements $4,000,000 City/CIB/ Private/State $2,0000,000 (grant/loan) B Medium Term Submittal: 2019 City of Moab North Area Water and Sewer Service $1,000,000 City/CIB/ Private/ State $500,000 (grant/loan) B Medium Term Submittal: 2019 City of Moab Highway 191 Gateway Plan $1,200,000 City/ State Parks/ Scenic Byway/ UDOT $250,000 (grant/loan) B Medium Term Submittal 2020 City of Moab USU, Mill Creek Drive and Spanish Valley Intersection Improvements (Phase 2) $3,000,000 City/County/ USU/UDOT $1,500,000 (grant/loan) B Medium Term Submittal 2020 City of Moab Sunrise Hills and Allen Subdivision- Geological Hazards Mitigation and Drainage Improvements $1,000,000 City $1,000,000 (grant/loan) This resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of the City of Moab in open session this 28th day of February, 2017. CITY OF MOAB Attest: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder By: David L. Sakrison Mayor Resolution #19-2017 Page 267 of 295   PL-17-31 Agenda Summary  Moab City Council Meeting  February 28, 2017  Agenda Item #: 8-10  Title: Consideration to Adopt Resolution #17‐2017, Approving an Improvements Agreement for Phase  II of the Valley View Subdivision Located in the R‐2, Residential Zone at 930 Mill Creek Drive  Staff Presenter(s): Jeff Reinhart, Planning Director  Department: Planning and Zoning  Applicant: Route 46, LLC (Tim Keogh)  Background/Summary:   The City Council will be reviewing the final plat of Phase II for the Valley View Subdivision. A single  condition for the approval of the plat was recommended by the Planning Commission that stated:  1.A Development Improvements Agreement shall be approved by the City Council prior to recording the final plat. This Improvements Agreement, as the condition for approval, is before the council as the final step for  Phase II of the project. The Development Improvements Agreement, with exhibits, is attached for your  review. This final step in the approval of the site plan will allow the applicant to construct the required  improvements prior to recording the final plat.  Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council adopt Resolution #17‐2017 and approve the  agreement between the City and Route 46, LLC.  Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Resolution #17‐2017 to approve the Improvements Agreement  between the City and Route 46, LLC, and direct the mayor to sign the agreement.    Attachment(s): Copy of Council Resolution #17‐2017  Improvements Agreement with Attachments  Page 268 of 295 CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION #17-2017 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF PHASE II OF VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-2 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, Tim Keogh, representing Route 46, LLC, with a mailing address of Box 396, Moab, Utah 84532, has applied to develop fourteen total residential dwellings (8 single family dwellings and 3 attached single family dwellings) for Phase II of the Valley View Subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the applicant provided the City of Moab with the necessary documents, plans and drawings to complete the application for the Final Plat-Phase II of the proposed subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the City of Moab Planning Commission (“Commission”) held a public meeting and reviewed and conditionally approved the Final Plat-Phase II on January 26, 2017; and, WHEREAS, the proposed uses are allowed in the R-2 as listed in Moab Municipal Code (MMC) Chapter 17.45.020, Use Regulations; and WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) held a public meeting to review the Phase II, Final Plat on February 28, 2017; and, WHEREAS, Council found that the proposed lots meet or exceed the minimum required lot size for detached single family residences of five thousand (5,000) square feet for the R-2 Residential Zone as described in Chapter 17.45.030 of the Moab Municipal Code and the lot size requirements of six thousand (6,000) square feet for attached single-family dwellings (“twin homes”); and, WHEREAS, Council, having considered Staff recommendations and discussed the pertinent aspects of the development, determined that the proposed final plat of the Valley View Subdivision, Phase II, has met or can meet the requirements of Titles 16 and 17 of the Moab Municipal Code and other applicable regulations. WHEREAS, Owner furnished cost estimates for required improvements and agrees to construct the improvements as attached to the Development Improvements Agreement as “Required Improvements”. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Moab City Council, the adoption of Resolution #17-2017, hereby approves the submitted Improvements Agreement (attached) for Phase II of the Valley View Subdivision and the Council authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreement. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on February 28, 2017. SIGNED: ______________________________ David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Rachel Stenta, Recorder  Page 269 of 295 When Recorded Mail to: City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, UT 84532 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT For Valley View Subdivision, Phase II For valuable consideration, the CITY OF MOAB, a Utah municipality (City), and Route 46, LLC (Subdivider) referred to as the Parties, enter into the following Subdivision Improvements and Development Agreement (the Agreement), pursuant to Moab Municipal Code (MMC) Sections 16.20.010, to govern the development of the subject property and the installation of subdivision improvements required by City Code. I. RECITALS. a. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Valley View Subdivision, Phase II, at its January 26, 2017 meeting. b. The Moab City Council, as land use authority for subdivision final plat approval, approved the final plat for Phase II of the subdivision on February 28, 2017. c. Subdivider has submitted to the City for review the construction plans and specifications entitled Valley View Subdivision Construction Drawings, Phase II, Surface and Utility Improvements (sheets C1.0-C6.1 inclusive, dated November 9, 2015), prepared by Goff Engineering, and the Public Improvements Engineer’s Cost Estimate (dated December 16, 2016) attached as Exhibit 1 (the Construction Plans). The Construction Plans show in sufficient detail the required improvements for the subdivision. II. AGREEMENT THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Covered Property. The recitals above are incorporated into this Agreement. The real property in the County of Grand, State of Utah, subject to this Agreement (the Property) is described as follows: A DESCRIPTION OF LANDS WITHIN SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Page 270 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 2 of 12 BEGINNING AT THE SW CORNER OF LOT 11 OF VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE I, SAID CORNER BEARS N 79o46'00"W 1667.34 FT. THENCE S 21o41'30"E 245.93 FT. FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, AND PROCEEDING THENCE N 56o56'51"E 124.69 FT., THENCE N 28o57'30"W 76.54 FT., THENCE N 61o03'00"E 50.00 FT., THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 14.00 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT 21. 99 FT. (SAID CURVE HAS A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 16o02'45"E 19.80 FT.), THENCE N 61o03'00"E 72.45 FT., THENCE S 28o57'30"E 90.58 FT., THENCE N 60o12'46"E 17.26 FT., THENCE S 28o57'30"E 50.79 FT., THENCE S 36o39'14"E 50.53 FT., THENCE S 20o59'31"W 67.96 FT., THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 50.00 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT 10.02 FT. (SAID CURVE HAS A CHORD WHICH BEARS S 67 o41'44"E 10.00 FT.), THENCE N 20o59'31''E 90.52 FT., THENCE N 28o57'30"W 6.23 FT., THENCE N 60o38'00"E 72.09 FT., THENCE S 23o33'00"E 187.37 FT., THENCE S 68o56'00"W 124.40 FT., THENCE S 19o09'09"E 90.00 FT., THENCE S 68o56'00"W 125.00 FT., THENCE N 19o09'00"W 90.00 FT., THENCE S 89 o48'24"W 95.02 FT., THENCE N 51o14'35"W 50.37 FT., THENCE N 45o54'00"W 75.00 FT., THENCE N 21o41'30"W 67.07 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 2.35 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. 2. Payment of Fees; Approved Land Uses. Subdivider agrees to pay all in-effect City fees applicable to the Subdivision, including but not limited to, impact fees, connection fees, building permit fees, and applicable inspection fees. Applicable fees shall be calculated and paid at the time of connection or the time when the service is performed. a). The uses permitted in the Subdivision shall correspond with the uses authorized for the R-2 Zone under the Moab Municipal Code and other applicable ordinances. The configuration of the Subdivision and the uses therein shall conform to the Construction Plans, Exhibit 1 attached, and the Final Plat, as set forth in Exhibit 2, attached. b). The parties agree to confer and, if necessary, execute supplemental easement conveyance(s) and/or releases if the alignment of a pedestrian easement granted to the City should change due to changes in the location of improvements on Parcel A, as shown in Exhibit 2. Subdivider shall at all times assure that adequate public pedestrian access is maintained, consistent with prior approvals. 3. Required Improvements. Subdivider shall construct all of the improvements on and adjacent to the Property shown on the Final Plat and the Construction Plans (the Required Improvements). Required Improvements shall include the public improvements shown on the Construction Plans, as well as all other improvements Page 271 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 3 of 12 shown on the Construction Plans, or as needed for the lawful use and occupancy of the Property under applicable building codes. 4. Improvements to be Completed in Conformance with Construction Plans. All Required Improvements shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner and in conformity with the approved Construction Plans. No deviations from the Construction Plans shall be permitted, except as authorized in writing by the City Engineer upon a showing of good cause. In addition, all Required Improvements shall be completed in conformance with the City of Moab Public Improvement Specifications, building codes, and all state and federal regulations, as applicable. 5. Timeline for Completion. Construction of the Required Improvements shall not commence until the Effective Date of this Agreement. Construction of all Required Improvements shall be completed within two hundred ten (210) days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. a). A reasonable extension of time for the completion of the Required Improvements may be granted, at the discretion of the City Council, upon a showing by the Subdivider that there is good cause for an extension and that the work has been diligently prosecuted from the Effective Date of this Agreement. Without limiting this provision, good cause may include an extension of time due to the need to complete building construction prior to the completion of curbing, sidewalks, or landscaping, or as otherwise needed to provide for orderly construction and avoid damage to improvements in the course of other construction. b). If the construction of the Required Improvements is not completed and accepted within the timelines specified herein, or as lawfully extended, then the Subdivision and all development approvals shall be deemed lapsed and shall have no further effect. 6. Lot Sales, Building Permits, Plat Recording. No Building Permits will be issued until such time as all of the Required Improvements are completed and, with respect to public improvements, accepted by the City, except that building permits may be issued if Subdivider provides a Financial Assurance to the City conforming to Section Eight, below. No final plat for the Subdivision, or any phase thereof, shall be executed by the City or submitted for recording until such time as either: a) all of the Required Improvements are completed in accordance with this Agreement and, with respect to public improvements, accepted by the City; or b) a Financial Assurance conforming to Section Eight is delivered to the City. Subdivider shall not convey or purport to convey any lot within the Subdivision prior to the recording of the final plat. Any purported conveyance of lots by Subdivider prior to approval and recording of a final plat for any phase of the Subdivision, or otherwise in violation of this Agreement, shall be void. Page 272 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 4 of 12 7. Acceptance of Improvements, Warranty, Release Provisions. All of the public improvements comprising the Required Improvements shall be subject to quality assurance testing and inspection as specified in the Construction Plans and/or applicable reference standards. Subdivider or its authorized representative shall provide not less than forty eight (48) hours minimum notification to City when inspection is required. The costs associated with such testing and inspection shall be the responsibility of Subdivider. Any work which is rejected following inspection must be repaired or replaced at the sole cost of the Subdivider. Any work which is covered up prior to inspection may be rejected, in which case Subdivider shall be solely responsible for exposing the work and arranging for inspection. a). The acceptance by the City of the public improvements comprising the Required Improvements following completion and satisfactory inspection shall constitute a dedication and conveyance by the Subdivider to the City of all such improvements. Subdivider shall convey all public improvements to the City free and clear of any mechanic liens, claims, or other encumbrances. b). Subdivider warrants that all public improvements dedicated to the City shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner, in accordance with approved plans and specifications, and that all such improvements shall be free of defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance by the City. Subdivider shall promptly repair or replace any defective work following receipt of written notice under this warranty from the City. c). To partially secure this obligation, Subdivider shall deposit with the City the sum of ELEVEN THOUSAND SIXTY SIX DOLLARS ($11,066.00), which sum is equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction cost, as determined by the City Engineer, for public improvements comprising the Required Improvements (the Warranty Deposit). The Warranty Deposit shall be held by the City in a non-interest bearing account, unless otherwise agreed in writing. d). The Warranty Deposit shall be paid by the Subdivider no later than fifteen (15) calendar days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. e). Upon expiration of the warranty period the Subdivider may request refund of the Warranty Deposit in writing. The City Engineer and/or Public Works Director will review the request and promptly determine whether there are any unperformed warranty claims pertaining to this Agreement. Upon receipt of written verification from the City Engineer and/or Public Works Page 273 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 5 of 12 Director as to the absence of any unperformed warranty claims, the City Treasurer shall promptly refund the Warranty Deposit to Subdivider. f). In the event of any default following delivery of written notice to Subdivider with respect to Subdivider’s warranty obligations, the City may elect to draw upon the warranty deposit to cure, in whole or in part, any breach of warranty. This remedy may be combined or utilized in conjunction with any other remedies, in the sole discretion of the City. g). Subdivider additionally warrants that all public improvements shall be delivered free and clear of any mechanic liens or other encumbrances. The City may require receipt of executed mechanic lien releases as a condition precedent to dedication of the public improvements. 8. Financial Assurance. If the Required Improvements are not completed within the two hundred ten (210) day deadline specified in this Agreement, or if Subdivider desires to record a final plat or obtain a building permit in advance of the completion of all of the Required Improvements, then the Subdivider may, subject to approval by the City, deliver a Financial Assurance, in a form acceptable to the City for the use and benefit of City and to secure the completion of the Required Improvements which remain to be completed. The Financial Assurance shall be in the form of a performance/payment bond, escrow account, letter of credit or other financial instrument approved by the City Attorney in an amount which is not less than one hundred forty percent (140%) of the construction cost set forth in the Construction Plans of Exhibit 1, and as reviewed and approved by the City Engineer in writing, of the remaining improvements which are not completed. If a Financial Assurance is approved according to this Section Eight, Subdivider shall have up to two hundred ten (210) additional days from the Effective Date of this Agreement in which to complete the Required Improvements. The Financial Assurance provided under this Section Eight may be combined with the Warranty Deposit specified in Section Seven. A cash Financial Assurance shall be held in a non-interest bearing account unless otherwise agreed in writing. 9. Cease and Desist Notice. If the Required Improvements have not been completed within the time provided in this Agreement or, in lieu of same, a Financial Assurance approved pursuant to Section Eight, above, then the City may issue an immediate cease and desist order to Subdivider and all work shall be discontinued until such time as an acceptable Financial Assurance has been established. If Subdivider fails to take timely steps to deliver an acceptable Financial Assurance or complete the Required Improvements, then the City may record in the land records an Affidavit of Lapse of Plat/Plan and invoke such other remedies as may be available under this Agreement or at law. 10. Partial Releases of Financial Assurance. Upon partial completion of any class of Page 274 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 6 of 12 improvements within the Required Improvements Subdivider may request a partial release of the Financial Assurance. The amount of the release shall be equal to the agreed cost of the completed improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. Partial releases shall not be made for partial completion of a class of improvements. a). In order for Subdivider to receive such partial release, the following shall be presented to City: i. A completed Request for Partial Release of Financial Assurance Form, as set forth in Exhibit 3. ii. Copies of all quality assurance test results/inspection reports required for the completed improvements; iii. Copies of all weight/quantity tickets for materials incorporated in the work for all items that were estimated on the basis of weight/quantity; and iv. Copies of all invoices or receipts for materials delivered to the site and incorporated in to the work for which a partial release is being requested. b). The partial release request shall be reviewed for completeness and accuracy by City Public Works Director and/or City Engineer. The City may deny the request or adjust the amount of the request if inspection shows that items of work have not been completed in accordance with the Construction Plans, or if completed quantities are not accurate. c). Upon receipt of written verification from the City Engineer and/or Public Works Director as to the approved partial release of a cash Financial Assurance, the City Treasurer shall promptly refund the cash Financial Assurance in the amounts approved. Non-cash Financial Assurances shall be released in writing in the manner otherwise determined by the City. 11. Final Release of Financial Assurance. Upon completion of all Required Improvements in accordance with the approved Construction Plans, Subdivider may request that the remainder of the Financial Assurance be released, provided that Subdivider delivers executed mechanic lien waivers/releases from all contractors who performed work on the project and all suppliers who supplied materials that were incorporated into the work, together with a written certification by Subdivider that all outstanding charges for the Required Improvements have been paid and that there are no other liens, encumbrances, or other restrictions affecting the improvements. Final release of the Financial Assurance shall be reviewed and processed in the same manner as provided under Section 10, above. 12. Use of Financial Assurance upon Default. Upon delivery of written notice to the Subdivider and expiration of any cure period, the City may then elect to draw upon the Financial Assurance as it deems necessary for the completion of improvements or cure of Page 275 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 7 of 12 any default under this Agreement. 13. Zoning Compliance. Certificates of Occupancy for structures within the Property shall only be issued upon satisfactory completion and acceptance of all Required Improvements as provided in this Agreement. 14. Default, Remedies, Lapse of Plat/Plan. All provisions of this Agreement are material and any violation is grounds for declaration of Default. Prior to invoking any remedies for Default under this Agreement the City shall deliver written notice to the Subdivider describing the act, event, or omission constituting a default, and allowing Subdivider a period of thirty (30) days in which to cure or abate the violation. Cure within that period reinstates this Agreement. a). Upon declaration of default the City may exercise any remedies for violation available under City ordinances or Utah statutes, including, without limitation: i) proceeding against the Financial Assurance; ii). Withholding building permits, certificates of occupancy, or certificates of zoning compliance; iii) obtaining an injunction to halt or abate zoning violations or breaches of this Agreement; iv) recording an affidavit of a lapse of plat/plan, in whole or in part; v) commencing an action for damages—including damages for costs incurred in completing, repairing, or replacing Required Improvements or abating any violations; and/or vi) any other remedies available at law or equity, including the remedy of specific performance. The City may combine remedies in its discretion and pursue some or all at different times, as may fit the applicable breach. b). The recording of an affidavit of lapse of plat/plan by the City shall result in the lapse of all prior land use approvals and the voiding of the subdivision of lots within the real property specified in the affidavit. 15. General Provisions. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Subdivider in the ownership or development of all or any portion of the Property. Assignment of this Agreement shall require the mutual approval of the City and the proposed assignee, in writing. a). This Agreement is the product of mutual bargaining. All terms shall be construed in accordance with their plain meaning, regardless of the extent to which either party participated in the drafting. b). Failure of a party to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right, nor shall any course of dealing or previous action or inaction be deemed a waiver of any rights or claims arising with respect to later or subsequent breaches, acts or omissions. c). The term “Agreement” includes this Improvements Agreement, all exhibits Page 276 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 8 of 12 hereto, the Final Plat/Plan for the Subdivision, and all phases thereof, and all related design drawings, which documents shall constitute the sole and complete Agreement between the parties. The Agreement shall supersede all prior Agreements or representations, however evidenced. No modification to any of the terms of this Agreement shall be binding, unless reduced to writing and lawfully executed by both parties. d). The place of performance of this Agreement is Grand County, Utah. In the event of any legal dispute concerning the subjects of this Agreement, the parties agree that the exclusive venue shall be the Seventh Judicial District Court, Grand County, Utah. In any such proceedings arising under this Agreement, regardless of the denomination of the legal claims, the parties waive trial to a jury on all claims and agree that the action shall be decided by the court sitting without a jury. e). In any legal proceeding arising from this Agreement the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs in addition to any other relief authorized herein. f). This Agreement shall be governed by Utah law. g). This Agreement does not create any third party beneficiary rights. It is specifically understood by the parties that; i. the Project is a private development; ii. the City of Moab has no interest in, responsibilities for, or duty to third parties concerning any improvements to the Property, unless/until the City accepts dedication of public improvements pursuant to this Agreement; and iii. except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall have full power and exclusive control of the Property. h). The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and if any portion should be held to be invalid or unenforceable, then the remainder of this Agreement shall be construed to be in full force without reference to the invalid provision. i). In the event of any legal dispute arising from this Agreement neither party shall be liable to the other for consequential damages, lost profits, or delay related damages of any kind. j). All notices under this Agreement shall be given in writing by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or by hand delivery or delivery by a reputable courier, and sent to the following addresses: To the City of Moab: City of Moab Page 277 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 9 of 12 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Attn: City Manager To Subdivider: Route 46 LLC P.O. Box 396 Moab, UT 84532 Attn: Tim Keogh k). Notice may be delivered to such other parties or addresses as the parties may designate in writing from time to time. A notice sent by mail shall be deemed delivered no later than three (3) days from the date that it is mailed. l). Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to waive any governmental or other immunity to which the City is entitled under law. 16. Indemnity. Subdivider shall indemnify and hold the City harmless with respect to any third party claims, including claims for property damage, injury, or death, and any demands, liabilities, causes of action, costs, or damages, including reasonable attorney’s fees, that may arise from any act or omission of the Subdivider, its members, managers, employees, agents, or contractors in connection with the development of the Subdivision and/or the performance of this Agreement. 17. Future Legislative Power. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to impair or limit the future legislative power or zoning authority of the City. 18. Grading. All grading and soil disturbance undertaken in the development of the Subdivision shall be performed in conformity with Appendix J of the International Building Code (IBC) as adopted by the City. 19. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement is the date when it is signed by all Parties and the Council has approved the final plan of the Subdivision. 20. Recording/Release of Agreement. This Agreement constitutes an obligation binding upon, and running with, the subject real Property. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Grand County land records. Upon request of the Subdivider and verification by the City that all terms and conditions of this Agreement have been performed in full, the City shall promptly execute a release of this Agreement, which may be recorded at the discretion of the Subdivider. Page 278 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 10 of 12 21. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in separate original counterparts which, when combined, shall constitute the entire Agreement. Exhibits: 1.—Construction Plans; 2. – Final Plat, Phase II; 3. – Request for Partial/Final Release of Financial Assurance. Page 279 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 11 of 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the City of Moab, acting by and through the Moab City Council, which has duly authorized execution, and by Subdivider as of the date(s) specified below. CITY OF MOAB: ___________________ Mayor David L. Sakrison Date ATTEST: ___________________ Rachel Stenta Date City Recorder SUBDIVIDER: ROUTE 46 LLC: ___________________ Timothy M. Keogh, Manager/Member Date STATE OF UTAH ) )ss. COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing agreement was executed before me by Timothy M. Keogh, this _____ day of ____________, 2017. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ______________________. Notary Public, State of Utah Address: ______________________ Page 280 of 295 Valley View Subdivision SIA, Phase II Page 12 of 12 STATE OF UTAH ) )ss. COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing agreement was executed before me by the CITY OF MOAB by and through David Sakrison, this _____ day of ____________, 2017. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ______________________. Notary Public, State of Utah Address: ______________________ -End of Document- Page 281 of 295 ITEM NO. 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION CITY OF MOAB, UTAH CONTRACT ITEM UNIT QUANTITY Unit Cost Total C.URB AND GUTTER (MOUNTABLE) LF 1,000 $ CONCRETE SIDEWALK (4" THICKNESSS) SF 4,225 $ ASPHALT PAVEMENT (3" THICKNESS) SY 1,250 $ AGGREGATE BASE COURSE (CLASS 2, 9" DEPTH) CY 325 $ AGGREGATE BASE COURSE (CLASS 6, 6" DEPTH) CY 310 $ 8" C-900 DR14 PVC WATER PIPE INCLUDES REQUIRED FITTINGS, LF TRENCHING, BEDDING, BACKFILL 485 $ 3/4" WATER SERVICE INCLUDES TAPPING SADDLE, SERVICE LINE, AND METER PIT EA 7 $ FIRE HYDRANT INCLUDING APPURTENANCES EA 1 $ 8" SDR-35 SEWER PIPE INCLUDING TRENCHING, BEDDING, LF BACKFILL 300 $ 48" DIAMETER SEWER MANHOLE (COMPLETE) EA 1 $ 4" SEWER SERVICE COMPLETE INCLUDING SADDLE AND SERVICE EA LINE 13 $ 19.00 $ 3.00 $ 14.00 $ 30.00 $ 36.00 $ 35.00 $ 600.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 30.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 300.00 $ Total Estimate $ 12/16/2016 19,000 12,675 17,SOO 9,750 11,160 16,975 4,200 3,500 9,000 3,000 3,900 110,660 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTUCTION COST PHASE II EXHIBIT 1 Page 282 of 295 Page 283 of 295 ' i L_,. .Ll.1 q C 7 'l .J.L C c1.. 1 (' L -l L .L ch 1 'c_) • CS.2 c~ ~ ~-0 C:=, 4 CC:1.1 VI CINITY MAP SCALE: AS SHOWN -L L . cf ~ C Tit 2 r o \iE ::::c ___ , ' ', ::::HEET ·". ·E-... I I ' ' _.),, \_,· \I '. r-, --S T -F L .. !c.. \,, BO I\J T /c.. P&:~ ,~-,i,c-p ~.,-',,'', ' '~ -'' -' · , LE . .,: Ll I I . '·-·.IE' \,.' ',i "i' C -,, ''E-2-=-',, )' -.-; -, C p _, ~ DE-ul _S DE-u.l LS uFTu 1LS D-Tu . IL ~ -T ~-,11 CR' ,-~ U--: i J -' , r-:· / \ ,'----',. ', ~ 0.. AB BRE VIATION LEGEND .'>.BC ,i:.,C DI, DIP EC, [OC EC EP, FCJP FF. FT[ FC F L CB IN,, F P c , -o~c ::i T " SJ',hk SSMH I ~C. TBOC TD'N 0.A,E EW oc LF CL , Ci co EDP EDG UG FL , P_ FES EI,IP COi.i S-1/1·,IP A.GGR:::G~.TE B.,'.:.,S E c::01.Jps=- A.SPHAL -CE '·,I EN T po·/NG o uc -lLE RON (P lr'E) ED GE OF CONCR[TE EXISTl l,G GRO U \0 EDG E OF PAV[M[\T c-\I SHED F _QOR E_E /< TION c-NI S H ED GROo NJ r cOW Lll,E GR.<.OE B:;;E,<.~ IN \T RT E_Ei<Tl'Jr.1 POl~IT cc C,.,R\'A TURE POll!T OF RC:VE:;;SE CUR\E P OI NT OF TA l,I GEr.1cY R .".cl l US, R IGHT er ([ SI DE'1i,1.A.L ,< SAfl l T/l.Rv S EWE R •,1 A\HOLE TOP BA CK OF CUR B TOD OF 'Ii .AL L T V::0 I CisL OR A 0 P~OVED EQUAL E.A,CH ·,,1111\ y ON CE NTER Ll\l ,AR rlJD I c:::1\J -E~ JF RA.D luS cc:1,-c1ur1= CL E<.\OcJT EJGC: oc P<•/E I.IFl,JT [DG~ or G~AVEL ROAD U\D ER GROUIJO D ROD ERTY L 1,=: c L.ARED ENO SECT IOII 'JE S T l,I Al",AGEME N T PR>CTICE C ITY o c 1,IIJAB STOR f,IW ,AT E R MGJ•IA.GEME N T P L AIJ ' GENE RAL GRADING NOT ES 1. CO\ F:~C TCP Sr AL_ ':E RESf'O N51 BLE F DR O:'-A IN ING .All EX C.A.V A.T ION '°ER f.!I T FR Of.I l,IOA.B C -,. E U ILDlr,::; OEP.i>P-1.IE 'IT PRI O R TO COV•/El'IC NG CCN STRUC -ION ACTl \i l TIES w.L SO, UTA.H BLUE S T.A K ES Sr AL _ E 0 \0-IF IF~ :op CR TC i·'JY EX CA iATIO'•J ACT I V'ITY. 2. 5-,-E AI ID LDC AL REGIJ L s T 01,S "i'O-I IB IT FUG IT IVE D UST FRO M EXI Tli,G SI TE A.S .A RESUL -Or CU·Js-p JC TI OI! .A.C T , TES 1r, ORDER TO CO\ TRO L FUG ITvE DUST , THE "01 1 OW NG COllST Rv CT Cl, PF c :-ICES SH AL L ci E FOLLO WED: Ll l,11--11[ i\l·;I OUl·H OF D ISTURBE D A.RE'-.. ACTl\'E L Y BE li\G W:CPe:F~ [•C 1,10-El,.::;AGE 11•1 GRtJ l r,:; ACTI,, -IES ON WINO v Dw(S , USE WAT ER TO W[T D OWN DISTvRBED AP=:AS r PE:v[rl-L i , '.I C IS-,RE cc r .01-101, A._L FIL _ f.1.<T,Rl~I P"?IOR TO 0 LA.Cl ~I G /,1,D '°L.<CE 1r, COl/""C -EO L F-S 1.:;1 l<EC:D'JG ·2" 111 TH ICKri ESS, [STAB LIS H \EGET.~TO\ ON °R ES H_Y GRADED SURF~C ES AS soor, !,.s P"c <OT l (A_L y POSS :LE. , OV 1l,JEP S -IA.11 rlE R=:S"Gr,SIB L E 0 0'; Th=: COO RD ,N.t.T ON .A.ND COST Of PROV IDING A L L co·,,5-,;_.ICTIOI, SL ~·,.':::Y ',Ji::;. 4 . .CL_ \E::;ET,ATI \E C:::iE', TI I A.T S REl,IO·,ED DU R ING GRAJ l ~IG PR OCC:S S SHA.LL BE DI SPOS ED o=-.A.- 1_1,,\0"IU_ ~IL ESS r'ER l"·IISSIOIJ TU 3UF\I IJ\-S I TE S GRA flT[D B v O'iiNER A.N D A BUR f. P ER l,,I IT S OB-." 1,0 ~ FR C\I -H E OE "~.RTv=:1,-OF -E.~LT H. 5. JN-S -E 30~=?0W 1·.1"T;:::;:10 L v<." B=: USE D /s,S FIL L -o ,w,C H IE'/E -H E SUBGR.'DE ELE/.>.TIO\S :iH0,\"1 :fl T-IE F'LA.'15 . Tl·[ \1.<.T E'?l.<L SrAL L :;=: 0 RE C: oc IJRG<,\IC M.<.T 0 RI AL AND R OCKS Lis.RGER THAJ, ::·· 'I )IAJ,IEEF c·,m ::+<L L EE P L -'CE) '! 12" l,1A X. LOOS E ,IF-S, MO STURE COND I TION =:D TO ±.3% 0° OP -11,IU I.I, !.fl C CJl,IPAC T=:C -c T HE FOLLOW,NG S"ECIFIC A TIO N (.<.5 DETERM INED BY STD. PROCTCP A.S -1,1 ) 698:• 5.' , _L U",JE'l "·"·",=:IAE N T, ST"u:::-L.'<ES, .<ND ,<,1 1 RI GHT OF W."'' (ROW) -AT LEAS T 95% o=-1 .. 1 ) D CJ.L F _L Ul•IJ ER _c·m sc >F [J .<lE<S -.A-LEA.S T 90% O F M.O.D. 6. A LL FILL H<T=:R ,<I_ F_<GC:D 0 1•1 THc S -E S His.LL BE FELD TEST[D rOR COM PLI ANCE 'i/lTH TH=: =or.·F~C T 1or. C'l T"P I <,. Ei-C -1 _CT SHALL BE TES TED A.T 1 T ES T P ER 1,llOD SD. F T. FOR AREAS Ul•I C~fc STPL CT JP'::S, 1 -::s -P ER 1, JCIJ ~ 'J. FFFT c oR /sREAS WI TH IN RIG HT 0° W.A Y .. AND 1 TC:ST FER =: .'cfi ., LUCO s::. F T. F OR Li;NJSC <PEO A.R=:AS. -HE -ESTN G SHAL L BE AR'i.A.N ,~FD BY T-IE 8W'ER Al!C (1)1,CLJC-E D "·T -r ~ UV,•l,E:;,s ::,"E 'JSE, HOViEV i:J ? THE CONTRis.CTOR S H .ALL BE P ES DO~ISIB L E F2R CIJORrlll•i,< Tl\•::; T-I E SCHEDl LI i,::; '.::F THE -ES T ING. 7 cRIO'l -o ThC: "L<.CD.I E'IT oc i-.t, i "IL L, T HE /,RE:\ -o R ECEI '/E FIL L Sr,is,_L BE STRl 0 PE O 8r "L L \E:;ET.ATO'J A l•I[, RCOTS T '.:: A V '· DC:F -H OF 4 INC r'C:S. TH C: A.R E A. SH<I_L T HE N BE SCARll'IED T '.:: A CE"--1 Cc 5 1r..:.:ht.'.i. ,,,I C IS-Lc;:EJ :::O\OITCl,EO, .ANO COl,IP .<C-EJ f FI i,<_ Y <.PC GR.~C l~I G T D l,l"II H:'.II•, EX IS1 l"G GRAD ING TOPOGR.A.P hY & '/EG[Tw TION T O EX-E\-ross :LE. c CDl·ITP"C -O R S -1."_L C BTi-. I•, ;1, l .F .C.E .S. ~ERM I T FROl,I u-.A.H S T<.T E CEP.A.r'IMl\ I Ur E1 J/IR C'·Jl.li:'ITAL O J.l LI TY DR l :tR T O GOW,IE l,CEf.lErlT GE NE RAL WAT~R AND SEWER NO TES L A __ CO'·JS-R J C T 1Dh Or ,\'<TE" l!"l 'JS 5H"L L BE CCN D U CTED P c R T HF SPEC IFI C.is,T O\S SET FC•P TH 'J -r=: G=?~J,J CCl •nv ::;m,SIRUCT C N STAJ,.)AJ'WS. (CO r'IES A'JAI L 0 5 LE FRO l,I GRA.1·10 CD L,N TY) rHE _:::c,-1or. (1° EX ISTlr,G 3Ufi =:c LT LIT IES S H OWN orJ TH S PLAfl ARE I NTEND =:D FDR corJTP 1·C-D"!'S E )D l hG P EF =:R=:NCE 0 1,_ Y. CU\ T~.>.CTO R SH."LL B E R ES PONSIB L E FOR H.i\VING AL L BUR I ED u-l L Tl =:S L CIC"TEC FR IOR -o CCNS -R U CTIIJI, >,'JD SHALL N OTIF Y E N GI N EER IF CO NF LICTS A.RE ENCOUNT=fi=C J ,-,,-EP I fl 0 S Sc-A L L :'=: S,is'•J I T ZC:D .A.IJ D "L U SHED PER ST .A.TE OF UTL.H S"E C IFI CA TIDr,S .',IW L<.BOPA.-O R i' TEST PES U L TS F U R t,I Sr=:D T O G.//SS> ccR THclR .AP P ROV.A L P R IOR TO PLACING _l~IE S IN SU,'\, CE. 4 "LL ,0,ATFP V,AINS S-IA I_L -I .A\=: ,A.T _C:.AS T 48 IN . CO '/lR O VER THE TO P OF T H E P IPE. h ''f,iEG.'-LlG" T'rPE ::;or,t,ECTC'iS SH;'.LL l:li:. U~U ) A.T <_L JOINTS IN W>T[R l,1A INS WHE',E A. :::HA'I GC: ',CF [• PE::T JN •JCCUPS L ,=-TA P 1r1-D 0 /IS -IIK W~TEP 1,l;',II> SHALL B E COl1D UC 1lll BY GR.A.ND COUNTY P ERSONNc L rJP TH E [•ES C;'<6 -E [I co•np c c -o =c PRO,IFC-COIHR/.C TO R Srl,!sLL BE RESPIJNS BL C: FOR P R OI /ID ING !H t lffCESSOJ,v F-TINGS I\NC S l-;LL rR:::V 1D E EXCA\i.AT ION faN D BA.CKFI I I CO IH R .ACTO R SH.,\LL oc,:::RC ',J "TE :,CT l'vl T ES \'i'--c::;:,:'..,r ~D COUl',TY. <LL 3E'·i0S \ W> TER 1,I Al r, SH ~LL I." /E CONC RE T E THR U ST B L OC l<ING DER GWSS.t ST A.N O.i'R O oc-.AIL. '/,;:TEP =1F'E TC EE '-.Vs/WA. C -90C JR 18 (CL 15 0) W<T ER P IPE C OlvlP I Y lflC WITH ASTf,I -22'1' SER,::::: F IF E T,J 3E -'1V'.V-I C -90 1 . CL 20C -l ~P[ r l TT INGS TO BE <.WWA C -110 Cl OR DI, OF I/EC HMl1 [4L 1:::1 1,n r,:::c ,:r,IE G.~-LUC). SER',ICE SAD:::_ES TO 3l OF BRONZE COl,S TRUCT IOl'I ,OR =L ASTIC PIP=: ,:I.I JELL=:R 1,1 1343 1 OP EQ L A L) G ATF .A L vES T::: BE A'i,•i/A C-500 WI TH S TE EL '/A L ,/l BOX .A ND LID EM :'CSSEJ "'/,'-T[1" c 1R E HYDRA~I-S TO 3~ ,'\V'//A C -502 (1,11J ELI FR CE \TU'i l lJ fl SUPER 200 i',L23) COC:P2P!-IOI, S-IJFS I J jc_ V l=:L LE c;: -I 15029 OR EIJ U AL. 9 !,.A IEC: _11,E TJ 3E CS IJIEC TE) "ER AWW<. C-65'-99 .4.ND P RESSU RE TES TFIJ P FR .>'W W.A C-608 -?S PF 0R -:; ::O \,\l,,i 'SS IO '.J l i'>JG. 1J. EXIST,G Sb\'~ri 1·,1A. '1S T•J 3E rL U SI-EC T-O ROUGH LY P R IOR TO TIE -IN SE ',IER -" ~[_ Ar,m F TT i\G S TO [J[ AS -1,1 D -3034 COMPLIAN-, S=:iiER P IPE TO R F OF A.STM-01754 \IA.-ER I AL G<S-<E-s -o BC: <.S-'/ D-' tloY. SEWER M .AlsHOLES TO 3E .AS Tl.,I C -76 CO V PL sr-.iT '.'11-H ,5-f,I 0 -"-4 3 BC•.~TS, A l'J O .~Sh' .A.-4S LIDS >N) RI N GS. JDS TO B E E ~IB O SSlD "SEWER" 12 ~F .o.F'l _ 1.=: T J 3C: :: SP _>:::E '/EI, T !.J,D P ~l SSUF:=: TESTE D PER A\•'iWA C-600-99 P R IOR TD J SE. 13. 'lF _=:D EN D S :::F v;>-C:R ·"',C SE IV=:c; MA .IN PIP ES SHAL_ BE ORl=:NT ED TO -I/AR D S TH E llr'HIL L ENC• OF --IE "I P=:L N E GEN ER.ts,L STORM DRA IN NO TES 1 . :::,,.STRUC -2 11 OF STOR IA OR>I N S r ALL BE COMPLIM,T 'WITH MOAB C Tv CONSTR UC TI O~I STA',JARJ S :::cr .. STPIJC-C,I l'.CL 0J ES <._L F=:OJIFE ::: TESTl l,G .A'iD NSP ECTI IJN . 2. STOP\' [•'s/,11·1 P PE S-1."LL CONS IS-OF AN .<PPROVr:D CO"sR LG .A.TED S l•.I OOT H BORE 1,/.ATER <L : <DS '•J 12 OP EC J,c _:1 STO P'/ [;PAIi\ MA',H OL~S SHALL BE PR EC.AST CONCRE Tl Vil I H PRECU T BOR ES °CR "IP=:s qi[, S-IALL :!E .AS TV C -76 CCl,IP LIAJJT LDS ,O N O R l l,JGS SH.>L L BE . .\S H.I ,A-40 COVPLI.A\T .',l ,J _JS SH .c_L t:il ~f..13'.::SSEJ "S T OP V C"<.1 1·.". SEAL A L L 0 1PE ,\IAN HOLE JO I N TS WITH NOI I-SHR INf'. GRCL T ' :::,E-=:clT I J I, PC',0 5 S H>.~L B E COl•.STRcJCTED TRUE .<.\O ACCU RA TF I v .AS P E'< T-ESE D R.AWING S. J\S T=: BOR'lO\'/ 1,tt l UilA,L \'AY B E JSE D P'iO·iD ED THA-I T IS FREE OF ORG M >J I C l,1ATERl.<L MIO 'i O'.:I<" . ,<RCC:P '1-MJ 3 " IN D1~1,IETE'l. IJ/s-ERIA _ S-1 .A.L L BE ;::s L<C ED IN 1 2" 1./.<X. LIFTS, MOIS T uRE -R=:ATEJ , A N O C•J I.I P<'.;T EJ -o 95% 1,ID J f.llr ·, VJl,1 LIF TS SHALL aE TE S-E D "'.JR COl.1P.I\C I I ON A.T 1 TEST PER 1DCD s:. FT. RE CEIVED JAN O 7 20 15 BY: J GENERAL CONS T UCT ION NOTES U)l·I-P ,<C T oc; T C 'F P IF Y ;._1C\/.E'·JT, CEN-E~LI\E O,\l=i AL_ ,<0 P LIC/s,BLC: co-, F'<OM THE SE ;r,) 'O TH [R EIIG 11E=:R '":; DR < i l N GS BEF '.J=?E CJ"<S F WCTl011 2 -h[ T YC E, SIZE, OCt.TIOr . OJ,,) '!IJl,IB E R O F A.I I l<l•I O WN Ul··IDERGRO U1 \D UTIL T=:s A~E ,A.P F C;OX 11'1AT =: \V-cl•. '.:>-O 'i/r, or, T HE )RA•,\' 11:;s. IT SHwLL BE TH E R=:S P ONSIB ILIT Y CF -r:: CO clTR 0 .c -oR T O \ERIFY -HEIR E<IST=:IKE 'J,J _[G!T 0\ OF ALL uN :::ERGROurc U T ILI -IES .A.LO NG -~;: RO U T E OF -r=: ;,ORK E=:FORE cc,•:v=:r, I\G r-=:v, ,:::01,.STRU:::-10 N. -HE CO\ITR.ACTOR S HA LL BE RES P O rJS IOL E FOR U N K '!OV,N I, '.J[l~PG=?O, '•W U LI TI C:S . ;. __ R OAD C0'6T ,1c-1m J, ArlO p=:_A-E J WORe:, 1,1".TFR ,w,_S, TES TI NG, 1\\JJ OJ.ALITY OF woe;:~ Sl-i'.L_ CCl•IFO'<'/ TO T -IE S T.t'rn.ilc;:[I SP=:C FIC~TIDNS O F '-i OAB CT' .. is.S le.PPL CABLE 4 .. >_L, T LITv r1s-· LA -IC•'·JS TC :'E PEPFOR'!EO ll•J ACCORDM,CE Wl 'T H T-F SP=:CFCi\-l ON S OF ::;\l,•SS;C,, AS c:cp_1c;1BLE ~LL /,.C T E~ .<'.D SE'/,ER LIN ES 1,IU ST [J [ T[STEO <ND .".PPR O,ED "R 0~ TO P O:'..C CC l ·I S-RUC-0\ .. :.. L ,,\'!,,TE FL 'I E ll!S-1,,LU\TIO',S S H ALL COl"FOF'M TO THE SP=:Clr lC<.T IOl!S OF ':C".8 c 1-v. ,.'.!,f','J IJ Til .Y S-.'.!,-E C -\, . .'.!.-..,D UT4.H >_L SE'/,EC: _ 'E 11,'i T i\,LAT IOl•I S S-11\_L COrffORl,I TO Tr =: SPEC IFICcTO\S IJ F \IOAB 5. ,.'.:,LL EX:1S-ir,G SIT OF --1 15 PROJEOT 11,IP C:O\=:',IE •'ITS 11'.CLUO IN G I ,s.r1 osc<P 1NC WHICH ARE DA .Mis.GE] DUE TO CON'.:i 1 "<UC TIO'I S l "LL JE Ri::PAIRED ./ RE~Lc.CE J PR IOR -o i\.CCEPT/s\CF OF CIJl,,1PLET ~D 11,IPR D, C:l ·,IE\! T S. t ,. :'.LL TP."cF C CO i ,. KOL JEVICES & S GflS 1·,,I U ST B E ll·J CON FORfkANCE WIT-I -H E l,IAN U/\L OI, '--'I IF '.J=?l .1 -pocFIC CU·IT=?OL DE·,ICC:S ''.2 C•J.:) ,3_ ;'.L _ S T"E ET CC,\ -"JCT1or .. '.)-!ALL CONFOR ',I TO l,,I IJA[J C Tr ST .ANOA.RJS -\l·JD SPECIFICA T IONS C,JRR F /\T ;:,T (A-F c,c E(E• u -10·1 c,c --IE C =:iEL CP I-.IE ~IT .wGRt.l\l l N PE RT-\ N N:; TO Tc' 5 DE\'E L OP l,I Ei\ T. '/,HFN AJI E\ISTI \ • S~EE-I.IUS-3E CUT, TH=: S lh:EE T MU ST BE REST OR=:o -o ~. C ONJ I T m, EO J ,"\L -o o:, E =:TTEP -1-.<N TS C R C 'J<.I CDrlD I TION. Pl,TCHIIJG SHt,,L L 3E DONE IN CO\fOR MArK E '1\IT H MD <.8 C I-Y s-0.'ID."PDS. T HE Fl l,I ISHED P e, TCI-SHAL_ B LEl,JJ S,,.!OOTH I Y lrHO TH E ~:..1s -11,G SURF,-\C E. ;LL LARGE 0 A -CHcS SI-.A L_ E RES-CREC -o ?RE-E XIS TING CCI\OI T IONS 9. PR J" T C AflY C NS TPUC-IJl, .>.CT I \ITIC:S TH A.T F<LL WI TH II, A F IIR I IC R:CHT -:JF-'NµY, The C O'JTRA.C-OR Sc-AL L E C: ?ES"O '.:jlBLC: "O P 1 .. (T ~Y l l,G TH [ >PPRDPR l <TE PUBLIC E1,n -, At!D OBT.A l•'ilNG E'l •:F2 .A.C i-MEI\T ER i.l -5 IF C;E:UIREO. lJ .4 L L v::: ..... B c1-1 'N: C''i/SS .A. CC:\'.i l~U CTIOrl S TA.NO.ARDS S II ALL <PPL\, cs <PFLI CA.B L E. CL.AR 0 1C /isTC~I 0 '--~ TC CCIN FI IC Sc-AL_ E C: v1s.[IE B Y THE P ROJC:CT ErJGIN t.lc;: AN O/O P -HE CITY AND COGNTY [11:;11 ,1EE~S .. <S .~ P LIC AB LE GE N ERAL CONCR TE AND PAVEMENT NO TES <_L C:,Jf.lCPET~ U =:::: F CF C:>:TE=?IC R FL .AT-W CRk M!C CUri:i & GUT TER SHA_L HA'/[ MI N . 3'.:D G P SI 25 -JtY CJ'iP R E SI\E ST:;;El\.:TH, 'i,•/ 4 %-3 % ENT R!,INED A IR 2 . "L L CONCc;:ETE S . is ~-E 0 P l .,G 0 D .<T .A. 1,,11,Xl l ,·I U l·,1 S_U l,1 P OF 5 1,. (5") IF :;i-i l '-TEP WGR i<.-'BILIT v IS JES F::::C .:.. '1'i..'.!.-E -~EDL:1r,1G .~.Cf,·11X T URE SrO vL D BL US F ~. 3. "LL CO'.C=i:ETE S < __ B=: FiEATFc• •NI T H A. SYIJTH=:TIC, l.1 E l,1BRAJ,JE-T YP E CURll,G CO l ,IP OU,O V\i::C l t.T:::L '·· .::..:--R F 'J ISf---"J3. 4 . 5"'1'>:C U T CO IJ TPC JO '!-S SH;\, __ BE PL>CEJ I \ .A LL FL"T COl·I CR F T=: .<,S SOC\ AS T HE cor,CR E~=: IS C 6. -i"PJ =:·,c•,Gr T S,c•,\' w/:J T pc, ,EL NG. S ,<.w Cu T S S H AL L 3E .<T LE>ST 1,}/ D EEP µ,\J SH ,',.~ 3E SPw •:;ED i,CCO P JI G T O T-IE 0 0 _LOW lll G SC Hl DULE. • ,~,'' pt,'./:::1..,r::r,.,J SL~B -~c' 0 C. E.ACr 'l",'.:c..·v GRO::il J CO'JTR L uO ll·I -S SH .ALL B[ ::c L.<.CED l ~I .is.LL FOR',,I ED CONC'i ET=: A -Tl l,,I E OF ::cm,=i:. GRCO\=:S SH~._L 3E 1-\-_[ · s -1" J E::= ,.'.:,'·.JD SY A.LL :::i E SPA.CED A.CCO RDING TC TH[ FOL_O\~i l ~JG SCHE :)UL E 4 " S OE'l1~L-S~AB E' O.C CLC;B :.NO Gu TT ER -10' O.C. Ol•I ST'l.i\ GH -R'ui\~ & 4 ' O.C. !\RO Ur,J ::UR ,·ES SO_.'\ -101. /EX P .< '•J CN JO IN TS SH-\1 I BE INSTAL_ED WHERE'i~R IIEW CONCRETC: IS PLACED AGA l l·JST E > ST III G CC,IC'lE SJ. J JClrlTS s-,_L B E O F 1./2" TH ICV, F XPA.l'i SI OI! f,1AT E'i l 1\L (C RuS-B Cl'l o:, PC BE A1,:c:;1,:p S-EJ 3 ( E x -=:·,Jll·JG Tl -[ FU_L C EP TH :,F THE fJEW WO~-. , __ c_) l c';IOF c ~ 'CR =:-E SI I c_L [J[ F IN IS H ED WIT H ,ii, LIG HT -BROOl,1 FINIS r' LEGEND: EX IST ING FEA URES ---6v',' ---s--- ---1:eF.--- ,--- ---G --- WATER MAI N (SIZE NOTE D) S EWE R MAIN (SIZE NOTED) IRR IGAT ION MAIN (S I ZE NOTED) OVER HEAD P OWER UNDERGRO U ND GAS --:,---,--FE N CE P AV EMENT EDGE EASEMEN T EX ISTING M AJOR CON T O UR EX IST I N G MINOR CONTOUR PR OPOS ED F AT URES - ASPHALT PAV ING CONC RETE PAVING STO RM DRA IN & MANH OLE WATER MAIN ,'?, '0 0 E-- IX lD TRANSFORM ER SEWER MANHOLE U TILI TY PO L E UT ILI TY P OL E ANCHOR S IGN ON META L POST STANDARD FIR E H YDRANT WATE R VALV E GAS VA LVE GAS RISER GAS METER SAN ITAR Y SEWE R & MANHOLE · " .... " .... ·" .... · -LI MIT S OF PROPOSED GRADING PR OPERTY LI NE --4170 PR O P OS E D MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR SET ENGINEERING, LLC GOFF ENGlNEERING + Sl1R \TI'TNG r~c GO FF E NGINEER I NG & S U RVEYING , INC . 1 26 ROCK POINT D R IV E SUITE A P .O. BOX 97 DURANGO, COLORADO 81302 (970) 247-1705 www Go ffEngineering com Ge "' ::r i;i-iee ~i ~; & Su~.e/ng . In:: e ):p~essl ;, reserve:: ·.-e comrno1 lo..., coo1ri :r: ,ci rc c:-er r:r::,c ert)" r"i;h:s in the se olo ns . -hese r:lans er e nc l :o :,e change: o r coo·ec in a 1y •o r-n or mci-r er ·..,-c:soe•mr re• ere :1 e;,, t c be :J ssig r-ed w :r/ t nir rl pa r t:1 .,.,iih ou t ~·rs: c:ta i -·'lg wr":ten ~e rr ·ss. e n an'1 rc:nse'lt o f Go'f ::r,;;in eer i r,;; & SL.r ·,e:~n,::;, lr c. © z 0 -U) -> -0 a:i I => <( I- Cf) =:, -s en <( w 0 -~ > >-w _J _J <( > Issue Record : PREUMINAR Y SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 FIN~l 110 \l cMBER 9, 2015 CONSnLCTION SET 01-0 7-2016 Revis ions: Project Number Draw n By - Designed by : Checked By Sheet C1.0 COVER SHEET 1 5-122 CTH RSH RSH Page 284 of 295 () lJJ u I-j W0 z U) 5 t-;, w LL w z (j z w r ... ~ ~~ 0~ (j~ ~ 0 " w (.') . E zOf-N o ~Zz<( g(/)'-' u..--r---00> UJ ·QUJmouir--,£ UJ(.')u_f-XG ~w z Z :,,:: :::> O z O r,'._ ~ (.') >-0 U) CD <( O '1" °' ZUJOUJ a::<(NC: UJ > ~ > o· ::J a:: -!i1! 0::"--. ooo LL ::J (0 0:: u_ 0 _J I"-CJ LLU)N0 0~~ o_.~ o s: (_') uu J w w ~ ... _j ,, I u _J S-L.J ' " -i, '" N 0 C'--OJ ---c I L 0 -z 0 .:.·Q] -\. i! '--(I] ---,(l.Jc,· o ~~1 §~)en~ ---,c,~1--5;g:i;_, C m n c::....,u c© me v;. n ~'IJl.ll <DC?.._c©-.,C::QJ -+-'I~ ~ ci_ l _2 ~ -D '!) ~ n :~ -:: 8 o, _ --~,,uoc'--'--:J: i.::::(~ a, m O o , _..., u m _;: o u ·c L . u u , n u>c '1l u ., U TJ ~ (_J L C ~ ,, L U Q.l C 'l!Eqic::_Ll uo~ ..... c c::-v ..r::O C.1-·.-Lo,·· \ -, • -<lJ ~-., _L C n ,.,, (_JI_µ +-' ,_\l 7.~ :f; b,' ~~()~;,~~!LL·~. w ---, _-. ·-v;-u, n , ~ · (l' (I) L ~ ,, Ul CC O -f-~ .. ->fl)·•, LoL...._ ,~'--"--' ---.,.,a.. u --~ n0, mo, (~ r~ :11 ~ .~ n fi .9 ' ... , .,-n C 1/) 0 0 D D 0 0 0 Cf) '" ,n r--0 " ,n HV 1n '8VOlf\J N01SI/\I08nS M31/\ A3ll'v' /\ 0 ,n LD CC) 0 r---N c') Cfl C'-J 0 Cf) 0 "T n 0 ,n a, 0 "T 0 0 C 0 0 0, r---r---r----,-ro 0 cci ~ = ~ 000 N N N ,r, a> ,...:._ N (C 9 ocw-u., ro o !:!! " -1,1 u., ->-I-6 LLI fri z VJ , • UJ 7-1:2 >-Q 0 "' >---u <>: u m z -" a: -cc :::, >-0) =i _, U) ~ ~ ~ ~ u; a.. Ci:" u 0 0 0 ,n ,n "' "' "' J-, "' _Q E vi I i C 0 "' -~ a: I i I I I I n I I OJ I I I I I~ t-'" '" u a: a: Cl. UJ 0 ~ C/1 • ..J ~ ~ N ..J _Q co <! >, "O CD • al a: C C X '" CJ UJ ~ "' u rn " © <D > • £ G 0 0 0 u I I I I I I I I I I I I <r I ct: I I I I I I ! I I / I St~ L..J --" 4 N n 'T 'T n '" '" -0 ro ro OJ OJ 0) OJ r--r-r--~ r, r-r, r--r, r-<D ,o co ,0 <D w <' 0 0 V 0 er, ,., l') ,., 0 C N w 0 > r---Cf) Cf) OJ en 0, 0, m IXJ [XJ CT) -lD l() U) lD w '° l() <D CD ,o ,o LO r---f-r-cc, ·J Lu --" ,, C) [_{) u 1/) u I r) . ' rs C. ~) I ' I I ' I I U' I I <r I 11 I I , I I l ( Cc I '" ,\ " "· .. ' "' •cl -------,------"" 'T 'T 'T "T "T "T ·-:I ' " ,j "T "" 'T "" -U') cC r--->D m C> -c-,.J cc 'T ,n w r---<Xl a, -----(',I GI N r, <, co N N N '" L . r--"" N ,,, 0 ,n t-, 0 n V ro . ',' ll'.l <O -OJ _J N ,n (0 N []] en U1 en 1/) ., r-.c r, -N ,n w '" C) co r-C) z (J", ::J L 0 0 n n Q> '" co <D r --" -w 'T "'' V ,., n 'T --" _J _J _J C. ' .c 0 --" ~ lXJ [I] en CC) ., C " I " --" (T) w [)' " r-CJ :J ::__J D (0 0 ,, er: =k Q, -(_) L :J u <T l,J -----------'·. 'T 'T 'T 'T 'T "T . " ,, -J ,t 'T w u. LL _J w 0:: u C) -_J LL T ·:::u:: CJ -'.~ ,., (.fl f-('j r-~; .,. ,n lC, r--CX] r_Jl -0 ' ---z _J LL " '•, \ ""' \ I I \ I I I I I I 1/ \ '\"\ ~. I I I >c/ \ "' "; I If \ '"'I I -1j-c---\\.c-__ _ · c--.'=r-;--_--==:.'.;c -=-~ _ ·-~" -:---.::=::_~~--~I --. . . ~,-. \,,\ A ··-... ----1-~,. , , G ,_ \ ··\ --~---._-<:;p --e-l,\,'-0---====~ 5W 0/ 6W -~w -0 -6W fiW---ov--FW---------r--5W O f,W ·-6W-n~ow 6W---Q\'; 6\'i' \ -+ , ;t; / .;+; ~~l :t ;\: \ \\ 3:AIHQ "'>I3:3:tl)-11I;--\'/. T --I ---i---I--+ ---j \\,"\, / \ \ /,/ __t' I If _ -<LL~ --___LL~ ) I~ ~ -=, <-'-'--:: =--~ \ ---~ ,/,,/,.,. ---5S-~ ~ --Bbr= --~ -~1---=-----;,·/-l---::: ~ T-°T BS .-...-~--e~ ---=-----=~ ~. ~ 4-8::;---8'.; -RS--. t!'.; 8S ----,'.:l'::i -BS-. \ / ---~x X ~ ------£ ·, \ --..I. --. -.L -·------C / v I /J2--. ------. / -.. ·' a::: LOOLOtO :=:i CJ C) C) ll) y· [_] u [_) l1 ·, ...LJc 11 n r--w I 1-r,r J t"'1 er_: CJ LJ O ·-! ----...__ r) II 1/> ~Ju ---y L ro r-...i J'-LlOC-.J _J~ 0 I II ---=;: I -(..J ( ') ...._.-1 _..::::;, II l -L__ L_ T I--I (n ct: ·1. 0111 I-[Jl w ~ 7 -"-u, ---r \.11 fl~1_ --, ~ f-I :0 :s :s :g :?i I 'I '< V il, -= ·"""r j~ ~ ~ ~-·"'},. ·... I .1__1 ~ · w ···· ru, I · 1--, = \ a::: -, ~ ~ I I l.Jj ._fntJ(D:.O : ~ -~-,-~-/ 1 :r. I V1_ t-C e; 11 ".' rn I 11 I . I . z : 1 =o, l!J 1 , / <.:, V1 -+ 1--~ n , ·m f "'a -f . IT / S / / / Z I :J, Cc O I, I ~; ;\ I 11 [ :,o "'<n <( : I , bl I I 5 · o ,,,-u-, -I ~ o a::: · " ; / <( ..J I W II C. lO ,., 11 I :'T O O . r, I I I a.. ~ f ~ i ~. ~, 't' ~j' 'I'll 11 t i I I L ~-2~ J· II / 11 'ro I'::;~ i2-.c:=~ '-;;:;: 1' 11 ;f,) OO;ll~·: I ···~~J II / /, I l <.:, . <( ,-. V) 3~ <.:, ~ J:(O I · ,·,S91~=--c,!,; . II / .i ~ c., L zZ F ~F V) VJ <fl (_') ---------:::, < w ~ f-.t r-I 11 I .· ·. . -"'."'.". ~ '° II /h I • _J , 3: -, <( >< >< >< w wW 'l I 00 f:!: I I f ~~ ' I FW /I I V1 lJ / / / ~l;:J ·1 r 89,til ; ·1~'T ······,/:=._ r;.,:-~9l~ ( 4 i I ~8 /; / 2 V) 1 '\ t: . · 1 t I , 11 1 / r I L_____JI I "'g I \: / , I .... 0-I 111 I ,--/ / / ~I · 0 . 1 "' "' 111 I I / ; , ~ I --...___...___, , 0 J' . J oo+ r1 , r--0 1 1 >-1 1 3c T~o . , ' ·. CD o If ' 0::: L/ I I tJ \ ' \ I L~ .. ~ -: : :;;: . L ~ I I I / < J I . I I ~ I N --: II ' ·'\ ---'O ~ Cl / ,, 5 e,: N "'' • -z:::::::::--_ I\ 1 : : \. I II · z ; "'. · ~Elli ' I <.!! ~I :~89 l t = ~ ' ~ 1' I • ': / :.;.; I Ii 6 w / // ' 1-2-·I "' . ,., ,··-· --89,t 1 . a:i z 1 0:::>-l;:J I I I c::,~: ' I ' ' 1; :"'-I -. l 111 1--:::J / / ~ ~ I "' ~ ,.., I I "' t I : ' I : • """-t 11 ' u / / / <( ::,; V1 \ " \ (' (fl , : 1/' ':"o : . I l <C o-f 1;1 !a:/ 6 t--/ / , 3: bl _j I u.. ti -+ -al'.,---;:; I : : ,"':' "' "' / I I O ~ Q / Q'r -'V1<( ow I" 11. II \':~I 8 111 ll: <::,; ,;· < <Ct--I I · "' · . I o_J 11 0w / ::::, W tnVJ . ,q ' : . ' I-<n , -N Q::V) I I I w I ::i; w ! "' . : " w w " , Ul w -w / 3: I-W :J VJ --: I ·. U I --I II •{ VJ <.:, I I w ww (l:'. I /' •. ----5(/) I -i: <( ~ / ; ' z ~VJ , T ' ...... . --:-11·: I ... ' ·r/ r es_j--89lt 11--x~. 'a.. 6: ~ :j I 1,--f.:---,' 00+1.:L rV)~ t l: I I _x::;;---x 1' 1· / z <( 2 0::: -~ ,..j i t;:j w ' I WVJ 3:w WW I I ~ \ I I 1 · 1 · 11 · o:::w · f · I I ~ Lu ': -.: ; j-1 I I~\ J 1. ·.II~~~: : e,: f I ~-, X--------::__ F~ tJ I I o. 1 ···. I w I ' I bl w q I ~ I I I <.:, 6 ;;,, I----._ '-. ---/ ~1 ~Jj_.··: ~ ,,, 1· : L3:V1~"'~.~ w I 111 ~~§;) j/ 3=~ ·-y_________ I :/ -. · ·. I E-< -~ w 0 u. I , 111 V) w o ., I . w I / ;· -(/] Z ---zo--f-ll. r; 000::: / ~ • < ll'.) V) Cl~ I ZL___ I l I I I I tt--1ttt ""'I -~ =--. ·. · _ : . . . . . . . . . . . '3 ~ 1:: ~ ~J J/ I ~ ~ ,,--. I / / / / / rl 111/1 t l· /~1 I ,,-"'--1~Q i\J // zu/1---=-:"-=-·--·i·· , ,'/ /!/ ~; I I~ I ' I\ 11 z , : I ,l-"~ I \ If // : I ( ,--"' ' ...J / / w c., n.~ a.. " I n-_, c; ( ~: w r-, -_> l"j O:) -.,_ <-9 ....... 1,1c, c~1r_) I r ) U I -'.j I ·--(j) 01 ·:t C) 'T '') --., ,--) ,::==,i en C_) II ! o ,.v .-,1 I u II c,~ ,_ I u •:.J II Iii --· II 7 c:i > ,=:,~:::: = Liu11----.::= (_~l -cl LL L'.:::. (r) _Ji-LL0.-:1 ·-1c.nozW l ~ "'g ' II' 0 / • 1 "'"-\~\ // •-:: I I":' ~ II) I·. :;;:~.,,.... / / / . ' · · I )f' \-0 Ol I 0::: l"Q"-.....,'. ";-(~ <( z u:;;: <.:, :::;; I I I " g • • ' co I : -[. I ,z_ ', ' :;· I "' :,i i;l I '· ~ f-,,, -:-:-_ "-<., C / !!' I C"'· ' ' ' .. ' L '-; "·· : I I -~ / "l 00 0:: :ii 1 'I I z a::: / 0 I=! I , , ,. r.: ~... +\~o+; L l, -~ ~J ,--I <~~ ,,:~:~LZl~lv-cc;\c.~ 1£~~~§ re,/ 'fl/ "'"' J • ; i\ . . .·· / r-; ., • . J >0 /1 I I e rr, . -: 1 ;o, · · · ·, . · · ,, I . g J , ' I I . / /, .'. ' . .-: ~--' ~ I I -_/ ... c u_ I I'//."' t ;'/·, -'-~--/ .··:r----.. ---wi--u.; Ci I I I ·. ---· · ---->< < / w~/ ~ ,, V I, I : I --' __ ... _. _.. :· ff!.._ 0-/ /. -----+ -'_ -.. -::.( i I 11J: =-11 -l :11 t :~1 · ,-4, /~t'"/ / I !'1.--J;t (7. / // ~,. -,\ ~lf f -I t I . : "' ..,, "'I "' l j O 1 1 "' ~ 1 v 1· /1 ~ . ~ r 1 :~; :~ g J I I ~ It :, t ~: J ( ! I I .· /i ' ::;: • ,,.. ·:'Ct "' ,~'" • ,1· ·I I I I II I ,-L~-!-I ' I I ••·. l ~ I f"-_:__-::::: ' I ' ' ' {/ dL ) I I ~ \1---' .. I I · . -:-= ··········. . .. ···~----E~ /~; I 1 -I_ r ' /(~ ·--., oo+~ .:..·. "-' C.c.C-'' ''. ·-· \. k OL L v . --L ·. '.: ;;;: :;...----;,.,,/' k, ~ i-~---.L .J:-_1· --.J I . I "' "' . --1 fl /) -11 ~ . , "" ,,, .-.:::---.:::: __ -r , a · r--v I ~--1 .--->-~ ~~:......__ ,, , I . j ~ ' • , : I " . I ;\f.JJ)/_J) ------* . . . · ,_ \ • <\ , I I L j ,._ g / '-0 , "' ... cj ---"""""""'""'~ ~ ~--"'b ...,.. I , : \ - -1 • . I t 0-t \ -0 0-~ <")tt:J "'ttl} F -0-"' "' . .. "' --"' .. 111! ~ I·,~, ,,~, ' . . ·"' -, "' C, I 0-\ -~/{!/' u.JW -I -/ V, (/) ~ a:: .,,, ... ,:,, <( < IJ".l I ~ --/ ·-.... ./ 7 - -.L_:C9' .. ' 8~llt' '[ -"' ·a ,-: C ·-.. _&&,... ./ i,__ I \ -----/.// w~ z .,.: ::J 1--0::: w ~ !:i! LJ V) V) w ,w wV1 3: w z I ---~------'/' -~v -------/ I ---- -__ _,, I ---/ ---_ I r --',R\.z--,,/ -----,..J.y,1 ---------__ ---___ II // --',RH--, /·'"1 ·-. __ ·····----... ···-... _ I /11 -----w f-/ -i!fj/ I / Z Z ( --/ I :=:i W ----{)f-, ~ I r-,Ju(.,J1D --_ ------___ 1' / zw 1 '-Ll··-1' U) 1'": (:! { '! ---::: def.1 -------- ----/ I / o en n..: (_'. r..::~ r•, I: ., I') l_) LI) lU ----------- ----/ I F ,<,( ) ~ C) t'', .J. ' ,o II v o . & , < w u '' I r· ·' ": I I >Xl f;( •Yi . 0 U + r-'c, :;;: .-[0 W (), --------/ , -0 _ t') w Ui o 0 -1/l 'T ~2, . --. . ·; / 8i ~ c": II en -J N rn 11 r, '""r,J · ·; / / _ w 7 ,_,."' ,,,, II •· '' <u ' i , -c; CJ u. ,c II r-0 " _II , 1. / / / x · ,== u II •.'.> ~ I 'l ...._) I , , .. -1-=;_,• I W _.,•_,J_ ,-; ~ ,c , ;_ I / . ••: 1--0:: r-~ I-l rn / :~ _JU) I VJ (') (/) :V -,l ./ /--~-:: t-o· -<-( -w w , >-w ~ ~ I I II C) ·I -I ' / // / / /l/ I I, / / / , / I {!' I , I /11 /II I / rJt / ;--/ , I I 1 I I I/. I <!':' I . ' I I,// I / I / L I,> 0 --" _, \ . \ '\ \ \ \ I J ~ ' ' ' , -t # Page 285 of 295 ,/ ~ 30 0 JO i SCA _E GRAPH IC SCALE PROVI DE EN D OF STRE ET TE MP ORAR Y DR AI N AGE COLLECTION CH AMBE R, 2 4 " DEP TH OF D(5 0)=8 " ROCK COBBLE, O.A .E. t·,1 '' I FE ET I I I I I I " " I I, I {- ,, . 4180 41 78 4176 4174 4172 -- 4 1 70 PVMT EN D S TA=16-,-63.72' ELEV=4166.5 4168 41 66 D . GRD LVC =l 01' PVI STA =15+95.9'. PV I ELEV=4 169.1 4 k=23 .3 CREST STA.=15+58. 8 CRES T ELE V=416 8.90 I I <D <D ")OJ u) OJ " <D +;;: li°l II 11 w uU >> mm I CL IN TERSECTION -STA=15+33 .4 0 ELEV =416880 -FIN ISHED GROUN) ELE VA TION @ CL - I - BONI TA ST PROFILE I I 48" MIN . EXI, TING GROIJJND EL EVATION GRADE BREAK ST A=11+67 02, ELEV =4 166 99 \ .\ \ --------_ _ -----_, 59% ---------------_.,..~ l 4 180 4 178 4176 4174 4172 4 170 4168 4 166 -------------r -----' ~--- ~ M ATC H EX. 0 VMT. 4 1 64 '-'')SET -E NG INE E R I N G . LLC GOFF E:'>IG!J',EERI'I/G ,-SUR\'E'l:Th(, I~C GOFF ENG I NEER ING & S URVEY ING , INC. 126 ROCK POINT DR IVE SU ITE A P.O. BOX 97 DURANGO , CO LORADO 81302 (970) 24 7-1 705 www.GottEngineenng.com ~,-~ ~ §j OBERT SEA ,~ {£_ HARR I S ~ I Q , 9,+9542 0 • ' ' f:-~ I, I ] , \. 1 ' 'I ?Qlf -Ji -P .J'"" -~ )' I> ,i -,.£ Of \l"'- cc~" "::ri g ineeri-; & 5 ur .·e.1.:~,g, h :::: e xc~esslf ~eserve s tre corrrr•o 1 lo·.., cop)f"i gr · re: c 1-er ~ro~erty r ·c;h~:: i1 t hese ::ilans These p l ans e re n<l t ~o ::e chongeJ e r cop ·ec in 0·1y ~orm ::i~ mo"-e~ ·,...-a !S0 €1'€'" rcr ere :1ey t c be ::iss iq·0 ed to :r ~ third par-:.1 ,,.,ith out first ci::ita i-ng ~.r ·:1en p err ssi :,n and c::irsent o f Goff :::rc;ineering & S .r ·,eyi--;, 1-ic. @ z 0 -Cf) -> -0 co => Cf) s w -> >-w _J _J <( > Issue Record : I <( I-:::, PRELIMINARY SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 FINAL ~O\'EMB ER 9, 2015 CONSTRUCTION SET 01-07-2016 Re vis ions: I 41 64 S A =16+63 . (2 ELEV=4 166.07 1 P RO POSED 8" P\: ' / C-SOO WMEeU 'l • ~STA=11+29.l41 ELE V=4167. 0 ~rl 1Q" _________ , 41 62 4 1 60 4158 -PROVID E END OF STREE T TEMPO~ARY DRAl'<AGE COLL E 'TION CH A !BER , 24" D P TH OF D 50)=8" ROCK COB BL t 0.A.E. -- FIT TIN G fc --_lr -------r ---=-~=:~-~=:i:-: __ r·,----l----~-- = =-=-- 8" VALVE ' TOR M DRAIN ------1 ~ N. CROSSING •~ °' N O '...::) f'-. :.D lD ~~ -_, [----------~---- -__________ L__ ___ _ EX IS TING I " J WATERLlf E (ESTIM ATED DEP T ) D c-._ lD 0 c-._ <D 4 1 62 Project Number : 15-122 -----------------~ D rawn By CTH 4160 Des ign ed by : RSH Checked By RSH 41 58 Sheet C3.1 -'T BONITA P&P ~\ ~;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;.,;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;..,.;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;.......;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;.,.;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;~;;;;;;;;;;...~;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;~;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;~ 16 +00 15+00 1 4+00 13+00 12+00 11 +00 10+00 Page 286 of 295 / _,,/30 SC.ALE 0 30 I -=.ET GRwPH C SC.i\LE I I 4 184 4 182 4180 4178 4 176 4 174 4172 417 0 4168 = ---r ---------- 4166 I I Q Q I 1, i cg I i \, - ' lg I I X Q ' --- X X -I -------------J---i---- 4164 4162 4 160 -- OJ N OJ C's . '° aJ <D "' :.:;: 0 +00 :c, Oi ::::, lD 1+00 \/ALL EY VIE W COURT PROF ILE /_ I.. / 149% L - E ISTING GROUND E EVATI ON - ----- \-.PeOPOS ED ff' e,c C -900 WA -ER LINE '° UC ,a- C: 0 u: ['---~v 2+00 -FIN ISHED GRO ND ELEVA TION @ :L / I / ------- 48" MIN _--1-------+ \ ELBOW ITTING _o ei C's -~ N I f'- tj--tj- 3+00 418 4 4182 4 180 4178 4176 4 174 4 172 4170 4168 4166 4164 4162 4160 4188 4186 4 184 4182 4180 4178 4176 4174 4172 4 168 4 166 4164 i ' ' " ' ~ ' ~ ' " ,,~--_EXISTING 8" ~ WATER MAIN (G WSSA ) Ii 6649513,85 E o7n4-----~ : .1 w L L ~.b::::, "-45· BEN:; 1,,---,, -, iD . ...,,u ! \· ,_ ~D,.!OV'E EX Sl 1~~G FLvSH \/.A.L'·,/C:: CO l l l'llCT TO E ~IST r ;G 8" ',,",,',<, Tc-R 1,1 A.11'1 T ob e VALLEY \/I EW COS LIP CF GUT TER PRO FILE 4188 -I :;:; :;;' m N v r-- +:,:;: 0 II II u .u > > <I) ) ELEV= 4171 . 71 LVC = 150' PVI STA= 1+2 4 ,37 P VI EL EV.>=4 173.5 8 k=SO .O CRE ST S TP =1 +24.37 CR EST ELEV=4173.0l E XIST l fJG GROUND ELEVATION I -FINI HE[ GROI ND ELE ATI N @ t L 1+00 --1. 0~ • ------1---- ST A=2 +48.174 ELEV=4171 7 1 2+00 4186 4184 4 182 4 180 4178 4176 4174 4172 4 170 4168 4166 4164 ENGINEE~I N G . L L C GOFF EN GN EERIN G + SUR\'FYL'iC I \C GOFF ENG INEER IN G & SU R VEYING . INC. 126 ROCK POINT DRI VE SUITE A P,O , BOX 97 DURANG O, CO L ORADO 81302 (970) 24 7-1 705 www.GoffEngineenng.com ~/~ ~~OBERT SEA ~ ,91 1 HARijl S 1,,_· 1?· 0. 9-+9 420 · \;J '-'i.Ai .,,, "I , ··\Jw "' ·,c·s-o· -Jy~, '" "!'-,, l"f Of \j'\ ,:;::d ~-,;·neerin:i & Si..r,.e :/ni;, Ir e E:lp ressl '.I re ::er·,es :1e commcr, ::·1,, cc p:ri g,l o·id ,:·.-1,::1· ::,ro~,=r ty ,..ig-:s r iri ese ~Ions These :;Ions :.i r e r-c: t o :i~ :hanged er :opie::J Ti on)" fo,-rn o· r1an-1er ,..,,ci ts oe: .. e- -:.r J,..e :re, tc :,e assignee to u1,/ tr·rc oa r·.y ..,·t-01..: "i-st cbtoin ir ,; ·.-.(:ten :ier"T1·ss i or end c:::i-se-.t oi :;off ET;J rcer·r.g & Sj,..,.,e;/-;, Ir,:_ ~J z 0 -Cf) -> -0 co ::> Cf) s: w -> >-w _J _J <( > Issue Record -aJ <( 0 ~ PRELIM INARY SEP TEMBER 25, 20 15 FINAL ~O VEMBER 9, 2015 CONSTR UC TIO N SET JI -07-2016 Revis ions: Project Number : l 5· 122 Dr a wn By CTH Designed by : C he cked By Sheet C3 .2 VALLEY VIEW P&P RSH RSH / Page 287 of 295 3C 611 / I ~ 30 0 I / I cue - / , G'iu.P -IC SC,C L E /t / / ' / f SSMH /13 _( 48" ¢) n S. STA . 6+20 .69 RIM=4167 .14 ALIGNMENT=SANITARY SEV1£R LINE 1 f ,' / STAT10N=6+30.69 ..-, / OFFSET=0 .00 ' 1 , .. .. NORTHING=6649843. 7 2 / EASTING=2203803.44 .-_.. / / ,' / 4174 4172 4 170 4168 4 166 4 16 4 4162 4160 4158 4 156 4154 4152 4150 "' !E ' / / / I / .. / , / ( / / CEN SSI H #3 (48" ¢) ~ ~ S. STA. 6+ 20.69 ~ ~ RIM =4 167.14 [5.5'] ' 8" I NV.(IN)=4161.6 8" INV.( UT)=4161 8 0 0 INS1LL 8" _/ CAP 5.00 LF I 8" PV C d -0 701 I I I ~ FINIS 1ED GROUND ELEV TION @ CL I SAN I TARY SEWER I LINE 1 PROFI LE I ~ EXISTING GROUND I EL EVATION 4174 I I 4172 4170 I I ~----:-~--=rv ~:::------~-1 =~--::-:~i -----tF :=-:;1t· ~~:~t~~~;~;:cc =t~==~---11,=-=-:::_::-_~=-=-j~--+_-1 ~:----J __ l _J~J-1,,---~ ---------_ . : : :: OROSSINGS ~ RI M =416 8.7 [8.0'] I ------1 ~ I I \, ----~ / 8" INV.(IN ) 4 160.76 I I I i [ --------..... ~-INV.(OUT =4160 .76 I -~ tf INV.(OUT =4160.76 ' ~ -1\ STORM DR N \ I CROSS I G SEWER INVERT ELEVATrN ELEV TION @ C f r \... t 392. 71 LF 8" PVC @ -0 86% I I j I I /-CEN EX SSMH #1 ( 48" ¢) S. STA. 0+94.55 j j RIM =41 s7.21 [9.8' I I I ! I I -J I L I 8" INV. OUT)=415 .37 4164 4162 416 0 4158 4156 4 154 415 2 4 150 \~ '<.AJ SET ENGINEERING . LLC GOFF ES GrNE E.RDi G + Sl"RVEYL~G N C GOFF ENGINEERING & SURVEYING , INC . 126 ROCK POINT DR IVE SUITE A P .O . B OX 9 7 DURANGO, COLORADO 8 1302 (970) 247-1705 www.GoffEnginee ring .com Go:f Eng '.neering & Si..r·,eyi "l g, he. exvessly reser .. ,es :ne c o m Mo "l aw cop :riqht 010 other propcr:y r i gr ts in hese per s These p l ans ore no: t o b e c hang ed or cc,p ec Ir, ar:,, form or r-ianner wh atsoe1,.·er ror are trey le oe assigned 10 ony tn ird pert,. ,,.,it i"o u t f ir st obtairi n g wr·t:er. t::€r 'rl i ssior1 ond c o nse r1 t of Goff Eng ineering & Surveying, n c. © z: 0 -(f) -> -0 co ::::> (f) $ w -> >-w _J _J ~ Issue 'lecor o: -co <( 0 ~ PRELIMINARY SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 FINAL ~OVEMBER 9. 20 15 CONSTRUC TION SET 01-07-2016 Revis ions: Project Number · Drawn By · Checked By Shee t C4.1 15-122 CTH RSH ASH BONITA SEWER P&P Page 288 of 295 Page 289 of 295 Page 290 of 295 Page 291 of 295 Page 292 of 295 Page 293 of 295 VICINITY MAP ·v11 ' ' .. ' : _... ) .;i ;'(n1,1 �' ;,;.;:'-,. ' .•,I II ,--1 -- "i,:,: • . -�-., ·1 ;�.,-I ,' : -; f ,; . I '. .;.a I ,1111 '' I,, ... ' I ?!'-� -, ' I " ,, • !.' I '•>',/f ! .,-_ ( II I' �-,,' I "' ' .... S• ,. " ' '" ·-'ti.' ' c1,;..,,. _., ... ·.,. '/ THIS SUBDIVISION CURVE SCHEDULE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD BRNG CHORD CI 21.99' 14.00' Sl6 °02'45°1,i 19.80' C2 24,59' 250,00' S31 ° 46'35'E 24.58' C3 82.12' 250.00' S44 °00'l8°E 81.75' C4 24.42' 50,00' S74 °38'29'1,1 24.17' cs 15.65' 50.00' N82 °24'10'1,1 15.59' C6 10,02' 50.00' N67°41'44'1,1 10,00 ' C7 17.14' 50,00' N52°08'05 °1,i 17,06' cs 22,58' 50.00' N29 °22'37'1,i 22.39' C9 35.25' 50,00' N03°45'30'E 34,53' CID 10,28' 50,00' N29 °50'47 °E 10.26' Cll 39.90' 50.00' NS8°35'43'E 38.85' C12 38.46' 50.00' S76 °30'30°E 37.52' C13 47 83' 50.00' S27 °03'55'E 46,03' C14 9,69' 300.00' S53°30'30'E 9.69' Cl5 49,99' 300.00' S47 °48'35'E 49,93' CI6 49,78' 300.00' S38 °16'57'E 49,72' C17 23.93' 300.00' S31°14'37'E 23.93' CIB 163.38' 275,00' S45°58'43°E 160.99' LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 15.00' N35 °31'47'E L2 15.00' N08 °32'47'1,/ L3 26,98' SOS 0l6'l8°1,i L4 3.94' N28°57'30°1,i LS 6.23' N28 °57'30'1,i L6 21.29' Sl9 °09'09°E L7 0.78' S27 °00'03'1,1 LB 17.26' N60°12'46 °E L9 39.32' N47 °09'45'1,1 NOTES 1.COVENANTS, CONDITIONS & RESTRICTIONS (CC&R's) FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE RECORDED IN BOOK831, PAGE 578 OF THE GRAND COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE. 2.PARCEL 8 HEREON IS HEREBY DEDICATED TO MOAB CITY FOR PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND A PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT. SAID PATHWAY SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF MOAB. 3.PARCEL A, THE RETENTION POND PARCEL WAS DEDICATED. VIA THE PHASE I PLAT, TO VALLEY VIEWVIEW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WHICH W,LL HAVE THE OBLIGATION TO MAINTAIN SAME UNDER THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED AT BOOK 831, PAGE 578OF THE GRAND COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE. A FINAL PLAT OF VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE II IN THE NE1/4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH GRAPHIC SCALE 0 '«> c,>_ POINT-OF-BEGINNING / SW CORNER OF LOT 11 OF VAillY \tlEW SUBD .. PHASE I LEGEND "' ' " "' �--1111-I I ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 lE '°'· 1.J 7430 SQ. FT. 994 s. 1,• <':J'o" 14 7382 SQ. FT. 1002 S. , 15 ,;-1114 SQ. FT. ,'\-<o· 1006 S. @ 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP AT LOT CORNER (TO BE SET) •FOUND REBAR MONUMENT THIS SURVEY FOUND GOVERNMENT BRASS CAP MONUMENT FIRE HYDRANT ,oo ,oo I I ft. w SUB D. HA -------------- AR 5,036 SQ. FT. b 995 s. n (j , \av 11:l < ··'\.. �'o· 11",a• ,s• s� 20-A 1, 7611 SQ. FT. '%- t o. ,, C9 18 1009 S.-�'l,'l, n�· <ov· ?.-; 20-B 0 5885 SQ. FT. 1011 S. 19 7642 SQ. FT. 101s s_ � 6871 SQ. FT.v\ 1018 S. 17 7040 SQ. FT. 1014 S. �"'- ------­ N?9·45·00"� w 7 66?34• -------EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7,T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM. (/) (') z a:: <( w aJ LI-0 (/) (/) <( SE CORNER OF SECTION 7,T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM. w --' n o· a:: n f--:' zO 00 uZ >-IIw --' (') --' z <( -> a:: PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE MOAB CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL MOAB CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL APPROVAL AS TO FORM SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, TIMOTHY M. KEOGH , DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A REGISTERED UTAH LAND SURVEYOR, AND THAT I HOLD CERTIFICATE NO. 171004 AS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF UTAH, AND I FURTHER CER­ TIFY THAT UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MOAB, UTAH, I HAVE MADE A SURVEY OF THE TRACT OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND DESCRIBED BELOW, AND HAVE SUBDIVIDED SAID TRACT OF LAND INTO LOTS AND STREETS, HERE­ AFTER TO BE KNOWN AS VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE II, AND THAT SAME HAS BEEN CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND STAKED ON THE GROUND AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION A DESCRIPTION OF LANDS WITHIN SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, AND MORE PARTUCLARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SW CORNER OF LOT 11 OF VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE I, SAID CORNER BEARS N 79'46'00"W 1667.34 FT. THENCE S 21'41'30"E 245.93 FT FROM THE EAST ¼ CORNER OF SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, AND PROCEEDING THENCE N 56'56'51 "E 124.69 FT, THENCE N 28'57'30"W 76.54 FT .. THENCE N 61'03'00"E 50.00 FT., THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 14.00 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT 21.99 FT. (SAID CURVE HAS A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 16'02'45"E 19.80 FT.), THENCE N 51·03'oo"E 72.45 FT , THENCE S 28'57'30"E 90.58 FT., THENCE N 60'12'46"E 17.26 FT., THENCE S 28·57'3o"E 50.79 FT., THENCE S 36'39'14"E 50.53 FT., THENCE S 20·59'31"w 67,96 FT .. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 50.00 FT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT 10 02 FT. (SAID CURVE HAS A CHORD WHICH BEARS S 67'41'44"E 10.00 FT.), THENCE N 20·59'31 "E 90.52 FT., THENCE N 28.57'30"W 6.23 FT., THENCE N 60'38'00"E 72.09 FT , THENCE S 23'33'00"E 187.37 FT., THENCE S 68'56'00"W 124.40 FT., THENCE S 19'09'09"E 90.00 FT., THENCE S 68'56'oo"w 125.00 FT., THENCE N 19'09'00"W 90.00 FT., THENCE S 89.48'24"W 95.02 FT,, THENCE N 51·14'35"w 50.37 FT., THENCE N 45'54'00"W 75.00 FT., THENCE N 21°41'30"W 67.07 FT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 2.35 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. DATE OWNERS DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, HAVING CAUSED SAME TO SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND STREETS HEREAFTER TO BE KNOWN AS THE VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE II DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR PERPETUAL USE OF THE PUBLIC ALL PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS INTENDED FOR PUBLIC USE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS THIS ___ DAY OF ___ A.D , 20 __ _ ROUTE 46, L.L.C., OWNER, BY: TIMOTHY M. KEOGH, MANAGER/MEMBER WILLIAM W. WINFIELD, MANAGER/MEMBER ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF ___ S.S. ON THE __ DAY OF ______ A.O., 20 __ PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED NOTARY PUBLIC, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ____ IN SAID STATE OF UTAH, THE SIGNER( ) OF THE ABOVE OWNERS DEDICATION, ___ IN NUMBER, WHO DULY ACKNOW- LEDGED TO ME THAT _____ SIGNED IT FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY AND FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC RESIDING IN ____ COUNTY VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE II IN THE NE1/4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, LOCATED AT 930 MILL CREEK DRIVE, MOAB, UTAH ROUTE 46, L.L.C., OWNER & DEVELOPER PREPARED BY DRAWN BY: TMK DEC. 29, 2016 P.O. BOX 396 MOAB, UTAH, 84532 435-220-1135 SCALE: 1 "=50' COUNTY RECORDER NO. APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF ______ A.O. 20 BY APPROVED THIS DAY OF A.O. 20 ---------BY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE HAD THIS PLAT EXAMINED BY THIS OFFICE AND IT IS CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH INFORMATION ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. PRESENTED TO THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL APPROVED AS TO FORM THIS A.O., 20 __ DAY OF ___ _ STATE OF UTAH, CO. OF ___ _ RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF MOAB CITY PLANNING COMMISSION.THIS ___ DAY OF _____ , A.O. 20 __ . VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION, PHASE I WAS ACCEPTED AND APPROVED. DATE ___ TIME ___ BOOK PAGE ___ FEE __ _ ATTEST _______ _ CHAIRMAN MOAB CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE MOAB CITY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MOAB CITY ATTORNEY GRAND COUNTY RECORDER JAN O 3 2017 BY: EXHIBIT 2Page 294 of 295 EXHIBIT 3 REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FINANCIAL ASSURANCE Valley View Subdivision, Phase II, City of Moab Route 46, LLC (Developer) hereby requests a partial release of the Financial Assurance posted in connection with the Subdivision Improvements and Development Agreement (Agreement), dated _____________________________, as follows. 1. Developer has completed the following improvements, which are completed in a workmanlike manner and in conformity with the Agreement: . Copies of all inspection reports documenting completion and acceptance of the improvements must be attached, together with invoices for materials delivered to the site and incorporated into the improvements. 2. Developer requests release of the Financial Assurance in the amount of $ _____. This is a partial _____ final _____ release request. (Check as applicable). Timothy M. Keogh, Manager/Member Date DECISION BY CITY ENGINEER The City of Moab has reviewed the Request for Partial Release and inspected the work. The City hereby authorizes the release of the Financial Assurance in the amount of $_____________. By the City of Moab this ____ day of ____________, 2016. Phillip Bowman, City Engineer Attest: Rachel Stenta, Recorder Date Page 295 of 295