HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution 64-370RESOLUTION N0. 64 -370
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING ZONE VAR-
IANCE REQUEST OF HAROLD E. KREEBLE IN
ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 64 -86.
WHEREAS, on March 6, 1964, Harold E. and Elenor A.
Kreeble, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," made applica-
tion for a variance on the real property located at 4823 Fiesta,
Temple City, California, to create thereon a parcel without re-
quired frontage, and
WHEREAS, the matter was duly noticed, pursuant to the
Temple City Municipal Code, for hearing before the Planning
Commission of the City of Temple City on April 6, 1964, at
7:30 P.M. in the City Hall of the City of Temple City, located
at 9664 East Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, California; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant and all other parties desiring to
speak upon the said application were given an opportunity to be
heard on April 6, 1964, at the time and place set for the pub-
lic hearing; and
WHEREAS, after duly considering the matter the Planning
Commission adopted its Resolution No. 64 -74PC on April 20, 1964
denying the request of Applicant; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant duly filed an appeal and the mat-
ter was noticed for public hearing before the City Council on
May 11, 1964, at which time all persons present were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered the matter;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council finds as follows:
a) The subject property is a rectangularly
shaped parcel, fronting approximately 8o feet on the westerly
side of Fiesta Avenue approximately 200 feet northerly of Lower
Azusa Road. It contains approximately 12,640 square feet, and
is presently developed with a single- family residence.
The area surrounding the subject property
is developed with single - family residences, several of which are
established on parcels lacking frontage on a public street.
b) The subject property has been zoned
A -1 -5000 since June 17, 1947, when the property was part of the
unincorporated area of the County of Los Angeles.
c) North Fiesta Avenue is a 60 -foot wide lo-
cal street,
d) Applicant proposes to create two parcels
having the required area, one of which lacks the required public
street frontage.
The plot plan attached to the Application,
marked Exhibit "A" shows the proposed division of the subject
property. Parcel I contains approximately 6,177 square feet,
and Parcel II, contains approximately 5,680 square feet. Access
to Parcel II is by a 9 -foot wide driveway along the northerly
boundary of the subject property.
-1-
507
e) The greater number of properties in the
area do not have houses lacking frontage on a public street.
f) The area in the immediate vicinity of
Applicant's property similar to Applicant's is developed in like
manner as Applicant desires to develop his property and there
is no good reason to deny applicant the same privilege being
enjoyed by others; the property on the easterly side of Fiesta
in the immediate area of Applicant's property was developed as
a tract improvement long after the development of the property
on the westerly side of Fiesta as large agricultural lots; that
the size of the tract lots on the easterly side of Fiesta are
of no appreciable greater size than the two separate parcels to
be created by the Applicant's proposal; that no good and suffi-
cient reason of public policy or good has been shown by those
appearing against the granting of the application to justify
preventing the addition of a single - family dwelling as proposed
by Applicant; that there is no evidence that the owner or a
renter of the proposed second dwelling will be any different
than the owners or renters of the tract houses on the easterly
side of Fiesta.
g) The requisites of Section 9100 -1802 of the
Temple City Municipal Code have been met by Applicant.
SECTION 2. Based upon consideration of the findings of
fact set forth in SECTION 1. the decision of the Planning
Commission denying the application of Harold E. and Elenor A.
Kreeble in zone application Case No. 64 -86, as expressed in
Planning Commission Resolution 64 -74PC is reversed and the said
Applicants are hereby granted the application as requested
SUBJECT TO the condition that before any building permit being
issued in respect to the subject property the Applicant shall
file a revised plot plan, approved by the Planning Advisor,
showing a twelve -foot driveway instead of the nine -foot drive-
way presently shown upon Exhibit "A."
PASSED and ADOPTED this 25th day of May 1964.
ATTEST:
o u y> 1110
Mayor of e i y o
Temple City, California
y er o e o
Temple City, Califo nia
-2-
508