Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout05.03.2016 City Council Meeting PacketMEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 3, 2016 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fill out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the April 19, 2016 Special Council Meeting B. Minutes of the April 19, 2016 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Amend 21.00 Economic Development Fee Deferral Program B. Approve Well No. 8 Final Pay Application C. Approve Hamel Legion Park Concession Services Agreement with Church of St. Anne D. Resolution Approving State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Medina on Behalf of Its City Attorney and Police Department E. Approve Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment to CJDN Subscriber Agreement F. Approve Bid Results for the Medina City Hall Lower Level Renovation project G. Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding the Contract for the Arrowhead Drive Trail Extension Project H. Approve Arrowhead Drive Trail Wetland Replacement Plan VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. PRESENTATIONS A. Resolution Recognizing Dusty Finke for 10 Years of Service to the City of Medina VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Wealshire Rezoning, Site Plan Review, and Development Agreement — PID 03-118-23-24-0003 1. Ordinance Amending the Official Zoning Map to Rezone the Property at the Northwest Corner of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road 2. Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary 3. Resolution Approving Site Plan Review for Wealshire, LLC to Construct a Memory Care Facility Northwest of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road 4. Development Agreement by and Between the City of Medina and Wealshire, LLC B. Comanche Trail Improvement Project 1. Resolution Receiving Feasibility Report and Calling for Public Hearings on Comanche Trail Improvement Project and Levying Special Assessments for Same C. Cottonwood Trail Improvement Project 1. Resolution Receiving Feasibility Report and Calling for Public Hearings on Cottonwood Trail Improvement Project and Levying Special Assessments for Same D. Lakeview Road Improvement Project 1. Resolution Receiving Feasibility Report and Calling for Public Hearings on Lakeview Road Improvement Project and Levying Special Assessments for Same E. Medina Clydesdale Marketplace, LLC — PUD Amendment for Larger Sign — 345 Clydesdale Trail Posted 4/29/2016 Page 1 of 2 IX. OLD BUSINESS A. 2016 Mediacom Buildout X. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT XI. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XIII. ADJOURN Posted 4/29/2016 Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: April 29, 2016 DATE OF MEETING: May 3, 2016 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Amend 21.00 Economic Development Fee Deferral Program — City Planner Dusty Finke updated the policy to reflect the change for water connection fees and trunk sewer connection fees for larger uses in excess of 10 units so they may be payable for up to five years (currently 3 years). Staff recommends approval. See attached program policy. B. Approve Well No. 8 Final Pay Application — Attached is the final pay request from Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. for Medina's Municipal Production Well No. 8. The total cost for this work was $185,097.50. This is $10,052.50 under the original contract quote of $195,150. Staff recommends approval. See attached memo and pay request. C. Approve Hamel Legion Park Concession Services Agreement with Church of St. Anne — Attached is a 3 year extension to the agreement with Church of St. Anne's for Hamel Legion Park concession services. The partnership has been successful and staff recommends approval. See attached agreement. D. Resolution Approving State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Medina on Behalf of Its City Attorney and Police Department — The Joint Powers Agreements with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension allows for use of systems and tools available over the State's criminal justice data communications network by our prosecuting attorney and police department. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution and agreement. E. Approve Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment to CJDN Subscriber Agreement — Certain BCA systems and tools that include access to and/or submission of Court Records may only be utilized by the Medina Police Department if it completes this Subscriber Amendment. The Medina Police Department desires to use one or more BCA systems and tools to access and/or submit Court Records to assist the department in the efficient performance of its duties. Staff recommends approval. See attached agreement. F. Approve Bid Results for the Medina City Hall Lower Level Renovation project — Iwaye and Associates from Minneapolis was the lowest responsible bidder at $240,000. The cost estimate from The 292 Design Group was for $242,000 for the lower level renovation project. The bid does not include furniture, HVAC work for the Council Chambers, painting/new carpet in the upstairs office areas, and replacing old wiring for communications/IT. Staff will ask for Council approval separately on these items. Staff recommends approval. See attached memo. G. Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding the Contract for the Arrowhead Drive Trail Extension Project — Three bids were opened with the low bid submitted by Barber Construction, Inc. in the amount of $174,572.00. Staff recommends approval. See attached memo and resolution. A. Approve Arrowhead Drive Trail Wetland Replacement Plan — WSB & Associates have prepared the attached wetland replacement plan recommendation for the Arrowhead Drive Trail project. Staff recommends approval. See attached plan. VII. PRESENTATIONS A. Resolution Recognizing Dusty Finke — City Planner Dusty Finke will be present at the meeting to receive a resolution and be commended for his 10 years of service. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. Recommended Motion: Approve resolution recognizing Dusty Finke for 10 years of service to the City of Medina. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Wealshire Rezoning, Site Plan Review, and Development Agreement — PID 03-118-23- 24-0003 — The Wealshire of Bloomington proposes to construct a 163,000 s.f. one-story (w/ partial lower level), 150-resident memory care facility at the northwest corner of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road. The applicant proposes to construct the project in phases, with 115,000 s.f. supporting 84 resident rooms in Phase I. The applicant intends to begin construction on Phase I this summer. Staff recommends reviewing the entire project so that the applicant would not need to seek a future Site Plan Review approval to construct a future phase if requested within a reasonable amount of time. See attached staff report. Recommended Motion # 1: Approve Ordinance Amending the Official Zoning Map to Rezone the Property at the Northwest Corner of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road 2 Recommended Motion # 2: Approve Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary Recommended Motion # 3: Approve Resolution Approving Site Plan Review for Wealshire, LLC to Construct a Memory Care Facility Northwest of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road Recommended Motion # 4: Approve Development Agreement by and Between the City of Medina and Wealshire, LLC B. Comanche Trail Improvement Project — City staff prepared this report to determine the feasibility of improvements on Comanche Trail. The road improvements were discussed with residents on April 26th at a meeting. The project is cost effective and necessary to prolong the useful life of the road. Staff recommends moving forward with this project. See attached resolution and feasibility report. Recommended Motion: Approve Resolution Receiving Feasibility Report and Calling for Public Hearings on Comanche Trail Improvement Project and Levying Special Assessments for Same C. Cottonwood Trail Improvement Project — City staff prepared this report to determine the feasibility of improvements on Cottonwood Trail. The road improvements were discussed with residents on April 26th at a meeting. The project is cost effective and necessary to prolong the useful life of the road. Staff recommends moving forward with this project. See attached resolution and feasibility report. Recommended Motion: Approve Resolution Receiving Feasibility Report and Calling for Public Hearings on Cottonwood Trail Improvement Project and Levying Special Assessments for Same D. Lakeview Road Improvement Project — City staff prepared this report to determine the feasibility of improvements on Lakeview Road. The road improvements were discussed with residents on April 26th at a meeting. The project is cost effective and necessary to prolong the useful life of the road. Staff recommends moving forward with this project. See attached resolution and feasibility report. Recommended Motion: Approve Resolution Receiving Feasibility Report and Calling for Public Hearings on Lakeview Road Improvement Project and Levying Special Assessments for Same E. Minnesota Medina Clydesdale Marketplace, LLC — PUD Amendment for Larger Sign — 345 Clydesdale Trail - Clydesdale Market Place, LLC has requested a Planned Unit 3 Development (PUD) Amendment to construct a freestanding sign 317.6 square feet in area and 29'.2" in height at the NE corner of 55/Clydesdale Trail (Outlot B, Medina Clydesdale Market Place). The freestanding sign is proposed to be closer to State Highway 55 than the existing sign located on the Goddard School lot along the retaining wall (proposed to be removed). See attached report. Potential Motion: Move to direct staff to prepare an ordinance granting approval of the PUD Amendment based upon the findings and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. IX. OLD BUSINESS A. 2016 Mediacom Buildout — The updated construction plan would serve approximately 140 homes. The cost to the City for the proposed shared mileage would be $120,000 for 2016. Staff seeks Council direction on the proposed cost -share construction for 2016. See attached memo and maps. XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 003629E-003645E for $43,453.34, order check numbers 44248-44303 for $148,659.36, and payroll EFT 507105-507131 for $47, 773.47. INFORMATION PACKET • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List 4 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 2016 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in special session on April 19, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. at the Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN. I. Call to Order Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, Martin (arrived at 6:07 p.m.), and Mitchell Members absent: Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Planner Dusty Finke, and Public Works Director Steve Scherer II. Ardmore Area Subwatershed Stormwater Retrofit Assessment Jim Kujawa, Hennepin County Environmental Services and Shane Nelson, Hakanson Anderson, presented the findings from the assessment. The City Council reviewed and discussed the information on the assessment. Council directed Staff to move forward with review of the information and put together information on the other watershed partners and what projects have been accomplished. Adjournment Mitchell closed the meeting at 6:57 p.m. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi"# allup, City Clerk Medina City Council Special Meeting Minutes 1 April 19, 2016 1 DRAFT 2 3 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 2016 4 5 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on April 19, 2016 at 7:03 6 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Mitchell presided. 7 8 I. ROLL CALL 9 10 Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, Martin, and Mitchell. 11 12 Members absent: None. 13 14 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Andrew Biggerstaff, City 15 Engineer Tom Kellogg, City Planner Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, 16 and Recording Secretary Amanda Staple. 17 18 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:03 p.m.) 19 20 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:03 p.m.) 21 The agenda was approved as presented. 22 23 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:03 p.m.) 24 25 A. Approval of the April 5, 2016 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 26 It was noted on page four, line 29, it should state, "...was affirmative previously had 27 agreed..." On page four, line four, it should state, "...formal final..." On page four, line 28 four, it should state, "He noted that the applicant would be required to obtain the proper 29 permits would need to be obtained from the City of Orono..." On page five, line eight, it 30 should state, "...with the substantial items that -are..." On page seven, line six, it should 31 state, "... aft -et= in the future. He noted that the City docs have has..." On page six, line 32 18, it should state, "...has made their members have reached..." On page six, line 31, it 33 should state, "...fer to..." On page six, line 33, it should state, "...to state what amount 34 he is requesting of reduction the applicant requests with respect to the connection fees 35 to be reduced. On page six, line 48, it should state, "...development developments..." 36 37 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the April 5, 2016 regular City 38 Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. Mitchell 39 abstained. 40 41 B. Approval of the April 6, 2016 Special City Council Meeting Minutes 42 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the April 6, 2016 special City 43 Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously. Mitchell 44 abstained. 45 46 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:07 p.m.) 47 48 A. Approve E-Poll Book Agreement with Hennepin County 49 B. Approve Fuel Dispensing System Services Agreement with Beaudry Oil & 50 Propane Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 April 19, 2016 1 C. Resolution No. 2016-29 Accepting Donations for New Scoreboard and 2 Installation Supplies 3 D. Authorize Purchase of Scoreboard and Installation Supplies 4 E. Approve Ball Field Rental Agreement with Orono Baseball Association 5 F. Approve Butterfly Garden Quote with Designing Nature 6 G. Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for Deer Hill Preserve 7 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Anderson, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 8 passed unanimously. 9 10 11 VI. COMMENTS (7:08 p.m.) 12 13 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 14 There were none. 15 16 B. Park Commission 17 Scherer reported that the Commission will meet the following night to review the Dellcroft 18 Concept Plan, the Comprehensive Plan process, scoreboard graphics, and the proposed 19 location of the butterfly nectar garden. He advised of the tentative date of the spring 20 park tour and noted that the Commission will also discuss that. 21 22 C. Planning Commission 23 Planning Commissioner White provided an update of the meeting of the Planning 24 Commission the previous week. She stated that the Commission considered the 25 Dellcroft Concept Plan noting that many residents spoke against the proposed 26 development. She stated that the Commissioners believed that the rezoning of the north 27 half should not be considered until after the Comprehensive Plan has been updated. 28 She stated that some Commissioners felt that there were not enough areas to be 29 preserved for the south half to be considered as a conservation design PUD, although 30 some Commissioners did feel supportive. She stated that an amendment to the 31 Clydesdale PUD was considered and recommended for approval. 32 33 VII. NEW BUSINESS 34 35 A. Dellcroft PUD Concept Plan Review — West of Arrowhead Drive, North and 36 South of Hamel Road (7:12 p.m.) 37 Martin recused herself from the discussion because of a potential conflict of interest. 38 39 Johnson noted that this Concept Plan would include a 161 lot residential development 40 north of Hamel Road as well as a 22-lot conservation design Planned Unit Development 41 (PUD) south of Hamel Road. 42 43 Mitchell noted that all four of the Councilmembers at the table were present at the 44 Planning Commission meeting the previous week to hear the comments of the residents 45 and advised that this is not a public hearing. 46 47 Finke stated that he would be brief in his presentation as the Council and majority of the 48 residents present were present at the Planning Commission meeting the previous week. 49 He stated that the report referenced the proposed development north of Hamel Road 50 and south of Hamel Road separately because they are different types of development. 51 He noted that the parcel to the north of Hamel Road would be proposed to have 109 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 April 19, 2016 1 single-family homes and 30 townhomes while the property south of Hamel Road would 2 be proposed as a conservation design PUD, with 22 single-family homes. He noted that 3 in order to support the proposed development to the north of Hamel Road an 4 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be necessary. He provided an aerial 5 view of the site, noting the wetlands and wooded areas as well as a ravine, which 6 bisects the southern property. He displayed the Concept Plan and provided the typical 7 dimensions of the lots for both the north and south parcels. He noted that the existing 8 Comprehensive Plan as well as the draft Comprehensive Plan identify the parcels as 9 rural residential and advised that the applicant would be requesting a rezoning to low 10 density residential. He noted that the northern parcel would contain an open space 11 central corridor of 12 buildable acres and advised that the proposed PUD would allow for 12 a mix of housing types. He stated that the southern parcel would be requesting the 13 maximum allowed density bonus of 200 percent in order to go from the 11 allowable lots 14 that the applicant states to the 22 proposed lots. He stated that staff and the applicant 15 reviewed the site to identify the conservation objectives that exist on the property and 16 that would be the focus of conservation should this move forward as a conservation 17 design PUD. He noted that this is simply a Concept Plan review and no formal action is 18 needed. He reviewed the actions that would ultimately be necessary to allow this 19 development as proposed if the applicant does submit a formal application. He noted 20 that the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting were included in the Council 21 packet along with additional letters received from residents after that meeting. 22 23 Mitchell asked for clarification as to the base density of the southern parcel, whether that 24 would be 5 lots or 11 lots. 25 26 Anderson explained that one figure referenced the buildable acreage included in the 27 conservation easement, while the other included the entire acreage. 28 29 Paul Robinson, representing the applicant, stated that they heard from the Planning 30 Commission that there is not a lot of support for this and that is why they are not making 31 a formal presentation. He stated that they understand the opposition to the density 32 proposed and advised that they do not intend to apply for a Comprehensive Plan 33 amendment. He stated that this is a property bordered by commercial/industrial uses on 34 two sides and noted that perhaps this is an opportunity to consider the buffer use that 35 could exist on that property. He stated that they do not intend to submit an application 36 for the higher density residential development. 37 38 Mitchell asked if the applicant would be moving forward with the southern portion of 39 development. 40 41 Robinson stated that the agreement with the landowner was for both parcels and 42 therefore they will not be submitting an application. 43 44 Mitchell stated that the Planning Commission took no action and the Council will take no 45 action but will provide input. 46 47 Paul Crosby asked if the developer has seen the letters written by the neighbors. 48 49 Robinson confirmed that he has received copies of the letters. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 April 19, 2016 1 Pederson stated that this is a wonderful developer and probably one of the best in the 2 state. He was pleased to hear that the developer has taken the northern portion off of 3 the table. He believed that the developer has a right to develop the southern portion of 4 the property, but noted that it is yet to be seen as to whether the density bonus would be 5 allowed. 6 7 Cousineau agreed that she was relieved that the northern portion has been removed 8 from the table. She stated that she struggles with finding something ecologically 9 significant to conserve on the property outside of the high quality wetland and would 10 struggle to reach a 200 percent density bonus. She noted that conventional design 11 would preserve a great deal of the property. She agreed that the developer builds a 12 great product, noting that she lives in a product of the developer. 13 14 Anderson stated that he is reluctant to grant a density bonus to any developer, even to 15 this great developer. He stated that he would agree to some degree of a density bonus 16 and perhaps staff could provide a recommendation. He noted that Medina is open to 17 business when it comes to development, even during the process of updating the 18 Comprehensive Plan. He encouraged the developer to bring forward an application, if it 19 can fit within the confines of the current Comprehensive Plan. 20 21 Mitchell stated that the property to the north is a difficult piece of land, with the 22 neighboring land uses. He stated that from an overall point of view the City has lots of 23 land south of 55, east of this location, which is not developed and could perhaps be a 24 better fit. He stated that in regard to the southern parcel he is aware of the five -acre lot 25 development, which is classic old-fashioned Medina five -acre or larger development. He 26 stated that while this is a great development proposal, it would have a suburban feel and 27 would therefore not fit with the rural residential aesthetic of this area of Medina. He 28 stated that within the rural residential zoning area the key would be fewer houses and 29 not bonus density. 30 31 Cousineau stated that she does not see justification for a density bonus. She noted that 32 three percent of the entire acreage would be high quality and therefore would not justify 33 a density bonus of more than one house. She stated that this is a special piece of 34 Medina and therefore it would be hard to take away that uniqueness when there are 35 other areas of Medina that would better fit this development. 36 37 Robinson thanked the Council for their input. 38 39 Mitchell briefly recessed the meeting at 7:36 p.m. 40 41 Mitchell reconvened the meeting at 7:42 p.m. 42 43 Martin rejoined the Council. 44 45 B. Woodridge Church Addition - Covenant (7:42 p.m.) 46 Johnson explained that there is a covenant for this property, which allows for expansion 47 on the North side of the facility and the applicant would like Council feedback on 48 completing a portion of the expansion on the south side rather than the north. He noted 49 that if the Council is in favor of the concept, then the full public process would need to be 50 followed. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 April 19, 2016 1 Finke stated that there is a covenant against the property that was part of a variance 2 issued which addresses the maximum footprint of the building and parking area. He 3 stated that the applicant first came forward to the Council prior to completing that public 4 process in order to gain the input of the Council in regard to shifting the expansion to the 5 southern side rather than the northern side. He stated that staff does not oppose this 6 request. 7 8 Mitchell stated that he is not sure he understands the aerial photograph in the diagram 9 and asked for clarification. 10 11 Finke provided clarification on the aerial photograph. 12 13 Senior Pastor Paul Johnson stated that this is a natural hilled area and the addition 14 would be less visible to the neighbors. 15 16 Martin confirmed that the main entrance to the church would be enhanced. She stated 17 that she likes how the church is nestled into the hill and does not jump out from the 18 roadway. She stated that she is concerned with adding that mass close to County Road 19 24 as it would make the church more visible from the roadway. She noted that the 20 neighbors to the back are already aware of future expansion in that area. She asked for 21 the estimated height and whether the addition would be visible from the roadway. 22 23 Senior Pastor Johnson estimated six to eight feet above the brim line of the roadway, 24 which would be hard to see from the roadway and confirmed that the addition would not 25 be visible from the roadway. He advised that the berm would still provide screening 26 along with an additional retaining wall, noting the drop in elevation. He noted that they 27 would not be creating additional parking. 28 29 Mitchell stated that the church is not visible from the roadway and therefore would see 30 no problem with this request being submitted and going before the Planning 31 Commission. He noted that the total amount of the variance is not being increased but 32 simply shifted. 33 34 Martin stated that she would be concerned that citizens could react negatively as 35 everyone has already agreed to the covenant. 36 37 Mitchell stated that the City is obliged to consider the request. 38 39 Anderson asked if the original covenant restricts development to the south and requires 40 all the development to be to the north. 41 42 Finke stated that the covenant restricts the expansion to the north as specified but 43 allows for a request for amendment such as this. 44 45 Cousineau disclosed that she is a member of the church but does not have a financial 46 interest in this matter. 47 48 Senior Pastor Johnson noted that this request would still meet the explicit language of 49 the covenant and the intent of the Church was that the picture provided was not exact. 50 He stated that they are attempting to build less in the back to provide less of an impact 51 to the neighbors to the back. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 April 19, 2016 1 2 Martin noted that she is not aware of the details of the settlement and simply does not 3 want to upset those that were involved. 4 5 Senior Pastor Johnson provided additional details on the settlement noting that it arose 6 from a moratorium the Council enacted and not concerns from the neighboring parcels. 7 8 Mitchell stated that perhaps the City Attorney could work with the attorney of the 9 applicant to determine what could be done with the existing covenant. 10 11 Pederson agreed that the City Attorney should review this request and if he approves, 12 the applicant could move this request forward. He stated that he would not oppose the 13 request as long as the parking is made up on the site. 14 15 Mitchell confirmed that the lawyers should work together to determine what could be 16 done. 17 18 Finke stated that Batty believes that an amendment to the variance would be needed 19 and that is why this item is before the Council tonight. 20 21 Biggerstaff stated that Batty's interpretation is that tonight would be a Concept Plan type 22 review and his opinion is that the covenant and settlement agreement would need to be 23 looked at for amendment and should the Council support this request staff can take 24 those additional steps. 25 26 Martin stated that she will support this but would recant that opinion if there is public 27 outcry. 28 29 Mitchell stated that there would still be a process for public comment. 30 31 C. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) — Annual Public Hearing 32 (8:07 p.m.) 33 Scherer provided background information on the MS4 permit, which the City obtains 34 from the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) to operate the storm water facilities in the City. 35 He stated that on a daily basis staff is inspecting storm water sites and construction 36 sites. He highlighted the storm water projects completed in 2015, which include the 37 Independence Beach Road project, Hamel Road/Tower Drive storm water runoff project, 38 replacement and installation of culverts, and continued pond and outfall maintenance. 39 He highlighted some of the projects for 2016 and into the future. He reviewed the 40 minimum control measures specified within the permit that are completed by staff 41 including pollution prevention and housekeeping items, public education and outreach, 42 public participation, illicit discharge detection and elimination, construction site storm 43 water runoff control, and post -construction storm water management. He reviewed the 44 partners in water quality improvements. 45 46 Mitchell asked if rain gardens have to be maintained. 47 48 Scherer confirmed that rain gardens do require maintenance. 49 50 Mitchell asked if there is a difference in phosphorus between cow waste and horse 51 waste. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 April 19, 2016 1 2 Scherer was not aware of a difference. 3 4 Mitchell opened the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. 5 6 No comments made. 7 8 Mitchell closed the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. 9 10 Anderson and the Council thanked Scherer for his presentation and the efforts of the 11 public works department. 12 13 Pederson stated that he is impressed with the projects that the public works department 14 is able to complete in-house, which saves the City a great amount of funds. 15 16 D. Minnesota Highway Users Tax Distribution Funding (HUTF) Update 17 (8:20 p.m.) 18 Johnson stated that Kellogg will provide a review of the funding mechanism for State 19 aide and how that comes to fruition for the City. 20 21 Kellogg explained that the State, specifically MSA, distributes the brochure which he 22 included in the Council packet, and identifies the four fund generators. He stated that 23 there are formulas in place, which identify how the funds generated will be distributed. 24 He noted that counties follow a similar process to identify County State Aide (CSA) 25 routes. He stated that Medina receives $250,000 annually, of which $185,000 is money 26 that sits in an account at MSA and builds over time that is used to pay for MSA projects. 27 He noted that the remaining funds, $65,000, are received by the City, via check, to be 28 used for maintenance on MSA routes. 29 30 Scherer asked how electric cars would factor into this formula as they do not contribute 31 to fuel taxes. 32 33 Kellogg stated that has not yet been determined. 34 35 The Council thanked Kellogg for this presentation. 36 37 Kellogg stated he has been living in Rochester for the past 2.5 years. Kellogg is working 38 with WSB to expand their services in the Rochester area. He stated that he and Jim 39 Stremel will share the responsibilities of the City and Stremel will continue to step up and 40 take over more of the responsibilities for Medina in the future. 41 42 The Council thanked Kellogg for his service through the years and his continued service. 43 44 Mitchell asked what the big projects will be this year. 45 46 Scherer replied that there will not be large projects this year and therefore staff will 47 follow-up on other maintenance items. 48 49 Mitchell stated that he spoke with a representative from Orono that is aware of their poor 50 road conditions and that Medina is maintaining their portions of the roadways that lead 51 into Orono. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 April 19, 2016 1 2 Scherer stated that staff will continue to attempt to work with Orono. 3 4 VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:30 p.m.) 5 Johnson reported that Clean -Up Day will be held April 30th from 8:00 a.m. to Noon at the 6 600 Clydesdale facility. 7 8 IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:31 p.m.) 9 Anderson noted that he recently attended the Long Lake pancake breakfast, which had 10 a great turnout. He asked how many trees would be available at Clean -Up Day. 11 12 Scherer replied that 150 or 160 trees will be available. 13 14 Mitchell stated that he attended the Mayors' Dinner, at which there was a presentation 15 regarding railway safety. He noted that rail oil mileage has decreased this year. 16 17 X. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:33 p.m.) 18 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to approve the bills, EFT 003609E-003628E 19 for $60,042.92, order check numbers 44189-44247 for $110,585.10, and payroll EFT 20 507073-507104 for $51,847.93. Motion passed unanimously. 21 22 Xl. ADJOURN 23 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:34 p.m. Motion 24 passed unanimously. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Bob Mitchell, Mayor 34 Attest: 35 36 37 Scott Johnson, City Administrator Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8 April 19, 2016 City of Medina Policy, Procedure and Agenda Item # 5A 21.00 Economic Development Fee Deferral Program Purpose: To create a payment program to mitigate the up -front costs to new or expanding Medina businesses for trunk water connection fees, trunk sewer connection fees, and park dedication fees. The program will serve as a tool to attract new or expanding businesses in the community. Policy Statement: The City of Medina will defer payment of water connection fees, trunk sewer connection fees, and park dedication fees for new or expanding businesses in Medina through the establishment of an annual payment program for up to three years. Water connection fees and trunk sewer connection fees for larger uses in excess of 10 units may be payable for up to five years. No interest will accrue on the deferred payments. The City of Medina and business will enter into an agreement on the payment program to be recorded against the business property. Procedure: The process for establishing a payment program will include: 1. The new or expanding business shall submit a written letter of request to receive deferral of trunk water connection fees, trunk sewer connection fees, and/or park dedication fees. 2. The City shall calculate the total fees and provide the business with a summary of the payment schedule. 3. The City will prepare, at its expense, the agreement for the payment program. 4. The City Council will review the agreement for approval. 5. The City and business will execute the agreement. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute agreements pursuant to this program on behalf of the City. 6. The City will record, at its expense, the agreement against the business property. Policy Approval: City Council approved on 5/17/2011; Amended 5/3/2016 21.00 Economic Development Fee Deferral Program May 17, 2011 1 MEMORANDUM Agenda Item # 5B TO: Medina City Council FROM: Erin Barnhart, Finance Director DATE OF REPORT: April 27, 2016 DATE OF MEETING: May 3, 2016 SUBJECT: Final Pay Voucher — Well #8 Attached is the final pay request from Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. for Medina's Municipal Production Well No. 8. This final pay voucher represents project completion on behalf of Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. and release of the retainage on the construction contract. The total cost for this work was $185,097.50. This is $10,052.50 under the original contract quote of $195,150. Public Works Director Steve Scherer has approved this contract's completion and has no items of concern. Staff recommends returning retainage in the amount of $9,254.88 to Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. Council Action Requested: Approve Final Pay Voucher from Mark J Traut Wells, Inc. for Well #8 8 oN Ham sPcN3d0 S1OV?111VOO1SlOtf2i1.NOMPopua;lyia;luuerVfl 961E/5 039O1; •anp aoueleq 00.000`51$ 4£ 64# eolonul sumo siapllns Jeuual a;aldwoo sl ;oafoud sly; uagm 05•Z50`06$ ale a34Nf1/�� lOVNINOO a3SIA3H 1900 al9 09160`981.$ 00'09 L'96l$ 09160'981.$ 88149Z`6$ 09160'981.$ 00'091.'9614 00'0$ 00'09I.`964$ 30Md1VEI 88'179Z'6$ 00'0$ 940Z/171./ti leuld 940Z/Z/Z E96E17 00'0174'1.$ 00'09$ 00'OOZ'4$ 9lOZ/8l/4 b 940Z/94/Z4 ZELEb Z9'L99'4Z$ 88'6£l'4$ 0916L'ZZ$ 9LOZ/6144l E 940Z/0Z/04 9617E17 EI•'l9ti`96$ LE'910'9$ 091Z9'401.$ 940Z/8/04 Z 910Z/9L/6 99EE4 L8'E69`99$ E9'8L6'Z$ 09'ZL9'69$ 9lOZ/W6 4 00'094'96l$ 00'09l'96l$ 9113M lf1b211 r �21b W 31VCI N33110 ;uatuAed eaeule;a21 auoa vom a;ea eolonul urns pe.ijuoo Jam a6ueyO wnS;oei;uoO Jo;oenuoO 0590Z-Z04 0£5-9£464-Z04 n3110321 AVd a3S1A321 1VNI91?:1O 3NI `9113M 111Vt11 f NNVIN 8 'ON 113M VNIa3W d0 A11O A WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 April 14, 2016 Mr. Steve Scherer Public Works Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attn: Erin Barnhart, Finance Director Jennifer Altendorf, Accounting Technician Re: Construction Pay Voucher No. 5 (Final) and Final Project Documents Municipal Production Well No. 8 City of Medina, MN WSB Project No. 2712-010 Dear Mr. Scherer: Please find enclosed three copies of Construction Pay Voucher No. 5 and final for the above -referenced project in the amount of $9,254.88. This is the final pay voucher for the project and represents the release of the retainage on the construction contract. Also enclosed are the following documents required for processing final payment for the above -referenced project: 1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC134 form). 2. Affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waiver). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. 4. Copy of the Performance Bond submitted for the project which also serves as the two-year maintenance bond per the attached email. 5. One copy of the final submittal for Well No. 8 from Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc. We hereby recommend that the City of Medina approve Construction Pay Voucher No. 5 and final for Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc., at the May 3, 2016, City Council meeting. Once processed, please keep one voucher copy for your records and return two copies to our office, one for the contractor and one for our files. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com 1002712-0100dminiConstruction Admin‘Well No. 8iRe-8id`Vouchere12712-01 CST LTR VO5 FNL CTY-s scherer-041416-w-FnlDocs.doc Mr. Steve Scherer April 14, 2016 Page 2 Upon approval by the City Council, final payment will be issued to Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc., and the contract for this project will be finalized and closed out. If you have any questions or comments regarding the enclosed, please contact me at 763-287-7195. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Roushar, PE Senior Project Manager Enclosures cc: Greg Johnson, WSB & Associates, Inc. Tom Kellogg, WSB & Associates, Inc. Linda Richards, MarkJ. Traut Wells, Inc. srb 1002712-0100dmin Construction AdminkWell No. 811;e-Bid\VOucher42712-01 CST LTR VO 5 FNL CTY-s scherer-041415-w-FolDocs.doc A WSB Owner: City of Medina, MN Date: February 22, 2016 For Period: 12/31/15 to 01/30/16 Contractor: Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc. Request No.: 5 AND FINAL PAY VOUCHER MUNICIPAL PRODUCTION WELL NO. 8 CITY OF MEDINA, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 2712-010 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 ChangeOrder- Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 0% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS PAY VOUCHER NO. Recommended for Approval by: WSB 8f ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Manager/Engineer Approved by Contractor: MARK J. TRAUT WELLS, INC. ROJ�4� vs1CtiTk Specified Contract Completion Date: February 28, 2016 $ 195,150.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 5 AND FINAL $ 195,150.00 $ 185,097.50 $ 0.00 $ 185,097.50 $ 0.00 $ 185,097.50 $ 175,842.62 $ 9,254.88 Approved by Owner: CITY OF ME8INA Date: 101027f2-nf0VWmlalfao' arucfon AdmlhlWaA No, aIRtNMVoueheral Pagel of 2 2712-01 car Well Vouchers FNL-022216V0 5 FM. COW PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER: CITY OF MEDINA, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 2712-010 CONTRACTOR: MARK J. TRAUT WELLS, INC. CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amount Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From To Current Pavment Total Retainaae Total Amount Earned 1 08/18/15 08/31/15 $56,593.87 $2,978.63 $59,572.50 2 09/01/15 09/30/15 $96,451.13 $8,055.00 $161,100.00 3 10/01/15 10/31/15 $21,657.62 $9,194.88 $183,897.50 4 11/01/15 12/30/15 $1,140.00 $9,254.88 $185,097.50 5 AND FINAL 12/31/15 01/30/16 $9,254.88 $0.00 $185,097.50 Material on Hand $0.00 Total Payment to Date $185,097.50 Original Contract $195,150.00 Total Retainage to Date $0.00 Change Orders $0.00 Total Amount Earned to Date $185,097.50 Revised Contract $195,150.00 Page 2 of 2 K:102712-0101Admin1Construction Admin1Well No. 81Re-BidlVouchers1 2712-01 CST Well 8 Voucher 5 FNL-022216 V0 5 FNL Summary MARK J TRAUT WELLS, INC CITY OF MEDINA WR I NO. 8 JOB #3011267 PAY APPLICATION # 5 - FINAL PROJECT COMPLETE - PLEASE RELEASE RETAINAGE Engineer Project No: 2712-01 City Project No: State Contract No. Contract For: Location: City of Medina - Well 8 Medina MN Contractor: Mark J Traut Wells, Inc 141 28th Ave South Waite Park, MN 56387 Contract Date: Contract Amount: Application Date: 01/30/16 Application Amount: For Period Ending: 01/30/16 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order Addition 3 Change Order Deletion 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less 5 % Retainage 195,150.00 $9,254.87 195,150.00 185,097.50 185,097.50 9 Subtotal 185,097.50 10 Less Amount Of Previous Pay Requests 175,842.63 11 Amount Due This Request 9,254.87 Mark J Traut Wells, Inc 141 28th Ave South Waite Park, MN 56387 (320)251-5090 1-800-728-5091 fax (320)259-0594 6 05'L60`58l :TV101 05'L60581 :mf1S 00'OSI`S6IS 00'Obb`I 08b 00'£$ .IS JauiegpunoS Li 00'00S`i 00£ OWS$ d'I mai11!S 91 %OOI 00'58t l 00'5817 1 00'5817$ Si woman, puessauquinld SI %ON OW00ZI l 00'00Z`I 1 00'00Z`I$ Si 8o1 paistildoao, p1 %00I OO.00Z I 1 00'00Z`1 I 00.00e 1$ S'I ,W-inS °VIA £ 1 %00I 00'5L£ 5 00'5L£ 5 00'5L$ In 8uusaypueS ZI %OOI 00'5L6£ 1 00'5L6`£ 1 00'5L6`£$ Si sPsIeuVtaiem Ti %£9 00'05L£ 0£ 00'000`9 8b 00'5ZT$ 2IH 2uidumdlsay 01 %00I 00'05Z5 l 00'05Z`5 I 00'05Z`5$ Si wamdinbg 8uiduind Isay anouiag pm neisul gsivanq 6 %98 00'5ZbZZ 69 00"000`9Z 08 00'5Z£$ 2111 ivauadolanau Ilam. g %001 00.00S17 I 00.0007 I 00'00517$ S'I ivamdmbg waiudolanaa anoula21 pug ligIsul gsiuund L %£8 05'Z998 5'91 00'005`0I OZ 00'5Z5$ AD ands nlnuue moiD 9 %901 00'00557 58 00'000`17Z 08 00'00£$ Al uaaioS on IluisuI ?S' gslull3 5 %SOT 00'081ZI 178 00'009`11 08 00'St1$ di 8msenAIIlelsulPug RNQ 17 %86 00'09Z8Z 171 £ 00'008`8Z OZE 00'06$ AI 2uTsED „ 8I Ileisui 7R ystuing £ %86 00'018' S bl £ 00'008`Z5 OZ£ 00'591$ di 8msea „tz lleisul Pue mia Z %001 00'SZSSI l 00'SZS`Sl 1 00'SZS`51$ S'I goumawgoyq I uolldpasaa dIAIOJ% aapd Xlluento lunomv pm sill xolddd aalad purl llun man ou 31Va OI 9N1T118 111101 paleausa 'IVNI3 - S # INIOLl.1 arlddV AVd L9Z110f# flOt 8 'OAI TI3N1 VN10Eilk dO LLD Agenda Item # 5C HAMEL LEGION PARK CONCESSION SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS HAMEL LEGION PARK CONCESSION SERVICES AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into this 3rd day of May, 2016, by and between the City of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City") and the Church of Saint Anne, a Minnesota non-profit corporation (the "Contractor"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City owns the Tom Anderson Fields Four-Plex in Hamel Legion Park (the "Site") which was constructed for general community recreational use; and, WHEREAS, the City desires to make available the sale of food and beverage concessions (the "Concessions") as a benefit to the general public at the Site in a City owned field house (the "Facility"); and, WHEREAS, the Contractor submitted a proposal representing Contractor's professional expertise to provide said Concession services; and, WHEREAS, the City and Contractor wish to specify certain terms and conditions relating to the Site and the operation, maintenance and use of the Facility. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and obligations contained herein, the parties agree as follows. ARTICLE I. CONTRACT DURATION This Agreement shall be in effect from the date of execution of this Agreement through October 31, 2018. The City and Contractor shall meet for a post season review after October 31st of each year to discuss the agreement and the duties of each party to determine if an amendment needs to be made for the next season. ARTICLE II. DUTIES OF THE CONTRACTOR 1. Equipment Approvals. The Contractor agrees to provide Contractor owned NSF equipment, approved by Hennepin County Health Department, for Concessions operated on the Site and in the Facility as identified in Exhibit A. 2. Inventory Requirements. The Contractor agrees to purchase and maintain an inventory of Concessions and to provide such Concessions as sale items. The Contractor agrees further to provide other supplies as necessary for proper Concession operations. 1 3. Specific Concessions to be Provided. The Contractor agrees to provide beverages, hot dogs, popcorn, candy, chips, and other refreshments for sale to the general public at the Site. The Contractor shall retain all profit from the concession sales. The Contractor shall submit a general list of Concession items and prices to the City with the understanding that specific items may change throughout the season. 4. Responsibility for Facility. The Contractor will be responsible for any damage to the Site, the Facility and the Facility's contents. 5. Times and Dates of Concession Services. Concessions shall be open from 6-9 p.m. Monday — Friday during regularly scheduled field use by the Hamel Athletic Club and during weekend tournaments approved by the City, beginning May 1, 2016 through October 31, 2018. 6. First Right of Refusal to Serve Concessions. The Contractor shall have first right of refusal to serve Concessions during the hours of ball field use. If the Contractor is unable to serve Concessions on any given day, a third parry may be allowed to provide Concession services at the Facility as long as they first obtain a license through the Hennepin County Department of Health or the Contractor agrees to allow the third party to operate under the Contractor's existing license. If the third parry wishes to use the Contractor owned equipment, the third parry will need to submit a $300 damage deposit to the Contractor. The damage deposit will be returned to the third party minus any damages after the equipment has been inspected by the Contractor. It will be the Contractor's responsibility to remove any Contractor owned equipment that is not being used by the third party and inventory from the Facility when a third party is providing Concession services at the Facility. All Concession services shall comply with all Minnesota Department of Health regulations. 7. Management of Food Concession Operations. The Contractor shall provide an adult manager for Concession operations at the Site. The Contractor agrees also to train and supervise all volunteers for proper Concession handling and cleanup. 8. Payments to City. The City waives all rental, connection and utility fees for the usage of the Facility for Concession operations. The Contractor shall pay to the City any remaining fees in accordance with the City's fee schedule. 9. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor agrees to comply with all City Code requirements, including licensing and permit requirements for Concession operations, and shall abide by the orders and instructions of the City's designated inspectors. The Contractor also agrees to comply with all local, State, and Federal laws, rules, and regulations that apply to such Concessions, including but not limited to, health and sanitary codes regarding the preparation, sale and storage of food. The Contractor shall, at its own expense, obtain and keep in effect all licenses and permits which may be required by law to operate the Facility. Contractor shall require all volunteers to exercise courtesy and consideration in their relations with the public. The Contractor shall be responsible for the payment of any sales taxes and/or personal property taxes which may be due as a result of the Concession or Facility operations. Neither Contractor nor 2 Contractor's employees or volunteers shall be considered employees of the City for any purpose. 10. Records and Reports. The Contractor agrees to maintain an internal control system which shall include tracking all revenues and expenditures. The Contractor agrees to provide unaudited financial statements to the City upon request by the City. 11. Clean Up and Area Maintenance. The Contractor agrees to be responsible for daily cleaning of the service area and daily pick up of all trash and debris located within 100 feet of the Facility. All garbage and recyclables shall be properly deposited in the garbage enclosure. The Contractor agrees to occasionally check the restrooms to ensure they remain orderly; this includes restocking soap and toilet paper and emptying garbage containers when needed. The Contractor shall be responsible for the cleaning of all equipment and the removal of all Concession supplies from the Site immediately following the close of the season. ARTICLE III. DUTIES OF THE CITY The City shall supply the Facility with electric, water and sewer utilities. The City shall supply the Facility with the proper cleaning supplies, garbage bags, soap, and toilet paper. The City shall be responsible for regular maintenance to the building including weekly cleaning of the restrooms. The City shall supply the Site with adequate solid waste and recyclable containers. The City shall arrange for weekly garbage and recycling collection by a licensed hauler to be picked up at the garbage enclosure. ARTICLE IV. INSURANCE The Contractor shall be responsible for insuring all of its personal property brought and maintained at the Site. During the performance of services, the Contractor shall maintain the following minimum insurance coverage and name the City as an additional insured: A. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance: $1,500,000 combined single limit with bodily injury limits of not less than $1,500,000 for each occurrence and not less than $1,500,000 in the aggregate, and with property damage limits of not less than $1,500,000 for each occurrence. B. Workers Compensation Insurance in accordance with Minnesota State Laws. C. Property damage insurance to adequately cover repair and replacement costs for the Contractor's property. ARTICLE V. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of all users of the Site and shall provide reasonable protection to prevent damage to the Site. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, agents, and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney fees arising out of or resulting from the performance of Concession operations and services under this Agreement by the Contractor, its officers, employees, members 3 and agents. Nothing herein shall be construed as waiving any statutory limitation on liability available to the City. ARTICLE VI. PRIVATIZATION CLAUSE Contractor agrees to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the "Act") and all other applicable state and federal laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. All data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained or disseminated by the Contractor in performing its obligations is subject to the requirements of the Act, and the Contractor must comply with the requirements of the Act as if the Contractor was a government entity. ARTICLE VII. TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason by giving a thirty (30) day written notice to the other party. ARTICLE VIII. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign all or any portion of this Agreement without the City's prior written consent, which consent the City may withhold at its sole discretion. ARTICLE IX. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. CITY OF MEDINA By: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator CITY OF MEDINA CITY COUNCIL By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor CHURCH OF SAINT ANNE By: Reverend Corey T. Belden, Pastor 4 Agenda Item # 5D Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016- RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF MEDINA ON BEHALF OF ITS CITY ATTORNEY AND POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, The City of Medina on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney and Police Department desires to enter into Joint Powers Agreements with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to use systems and tools available over the State's criminal justice data communications network for which the City is eligible. The Joint Powers Agreements further provide the City with the ability to add, modify and delete connectivity, systems and tools over the five year life of the agreement and obligates the City to pay the costs for the network connection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota as follows: I. That the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements by and between the State of Minnesota acting through its Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the City of Medina on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney and Police Department, are hereby approved. Copies of the two Joint Powers Agreements are attached to this Resolution and made a part of it. 2. That the Chief of Police Edgar Belland, or his successor, is designated the Authorized Representative for the Police Department. The Authorized Representative is also authorized to sign any subsequent amendment or agreement that may be required by the State of Minnesota to maintain the City's connection to the systems and tools offered by the State. To assist the Authorized Representative with the administration of the agreement, Cec Vieau is appointed as the Authorized Representative's designee. 3. That the Prosecuting Attorney, Steven M. Tallen, or his successor, is designated the Authorized Representative for the Prosecuting Attorney. The Authorized Representative is also authorized to sign any subsequent amendment or agreement that may be required by the State of Minnesota to maintain the City's connection to the systems and tools offered by the State. To assist the Authorized Representative with the administration of the agreement, Marijo Witteis is appointed as the Authorized Representative's designee. 4. That Bob Mitchell, the Mayor for the City of Medina, and Jodi M. Gallup, the City Clerk, are authorized to sign the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements. Resolution No. 2016- May 3, 2016 Dated: May 3, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016- May 3, 2016 SWIFT Contract # 108228 MN0273000 STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED AGENCY This agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension ("BCA") and the City of Medina on behalf of its Police Department ("Agency"). Recitals Under Minn. Stat. § 471.59, the BCA and the Agency are empowered to engage in those agreements that are necessary to exercise their powers. Under Minn. Stat. § 299C.46 the BCA must provide a criminal justice data communications network to benefit authorized agencies in Minnesota. The Agency is authorized by law to utilize the criminal justice data communications network pursuant to the terms set out in this agreement. In addition, BCA either maintains repositories of data or has access to repositories of data that benefit authorized agencies in performing their duties. Agency wants to access these data in support of its official duties. The purpose of this Agreement is to create a method by which the Agency has access to those systems and tools for which it has eligibility, and to memorialize the requirements to obtain access and the limitations on the access. Agreement 1 Term of Agreement 1.1 Effective date: This Agreement is effective on the date the BCA obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subdivision 2. 1.2 Expiration date: This Agreement expires five years from the date it is effective. 2 Agreement between the Parties 2.1 General access. BCA agrees to provide Agency with access to the Minnesota Criminal Justice Data Communications Network (CJDN) and those systems and tools which the Agency is authorized by law to access via the CJDN for the purposes outlined in Minn. Stat. § 299C.46. 2.2 Methods of access. The BCA offers three (3) methods of access to its systems and tools. The methods of access are: A. Direct access occurs when individual users at the Agency use Agency's equipment to access the BCA's systems and tools. This is generally accomplished by an individual user entering a query into one of BCA's systems or tools. B. Indirect access occurs when individual users at the Agency go to another Agency to obtain data and information from BCA's systems and tools. This method of access generally results in the Agency with indirect access obtaining the needed data and information in a physical format like a paper report. C. Computer -to -computer system interface occurs when Agency's computer exchanges data and information with BCA's computer systems and tools using an interface. Without limitation, interface types include: state message switch, web services, enterprise service bus and message queuing. For purposes of this Agreement, Agency employees or contractors may use any of these methods to use BCA's systems and tools as described in this Agreement. Agency will select a method of access and can change the methodology following the process in Clause 2.10. 2.3 Federal systems access. In addition, pursuant to 28 CFR §20.30-38 and Minn Stat. §299C.58, BCA may provide Agency with access to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) National Crime Information Center. 1 SWIFT Contract # 108228 MN0273000 2.4 Agency policies. Both the BCA and the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Systems (FBI-CJIS) have policies, regulations and laws on access, use, audit, dissemination, hit confirmation, logging, quality assurance, screening (pre- employment), security, timeliness, training, use of the system, and validation. Agency has created its own policies to ensure that Agency's employees and contractors comply with all applicable requirements. Agency ensures this compliance through appropriate enforcement. These BCA and FBI-CJIS policies and regulations, as amended and updated from time to time, are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. The policies are available at https://app.dps.mn.gov/cj dn. 2.5 Agency resources. To assist Agency in complying with the federal and state requirements on access to and use of the various systems and tools, information is available at https://sps.x.state.mn.us/sites/bcaservicecatalog/default.aspx. Additional information on appropriate use is found in the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Policy on Appropriate Use of Systems and Data available at https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/bca- divisions/mnj is/Documents/BCA-Policy-on-Appropriate-Use-of-Systems-and-Data.pd£ 2.6 Access granted. A. Agency is granted permission to use all current and future BCA systems and tools for which Agency is eligible. Eligibility is dependent on Agency (i) satisfying all applicable federal or state statutory requirements; (ii) complying with the terms of this Agreement; and (iii) acceptance by BCA of Agency's written request for use of a specific system or tool. B. To facilitate changes in systems and tools, Agency grants its Authorized Representative authority to make written requests for those systems and tools provided by BCA that the Agency needs to meet its criminal justice obligations and for which Agency is eligible. 2.7 Future access. On written request by Agency, BCA also may provide Agency with access to those systems or tools which may become available after the signing of this Agreement, to the extent that the access is authorized by applicable state and federal law. Agency agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement that when utilizing new systems or tools provided under this Agreement. 2.8 Limitations on access. BCA agrees that it will comply with applicable state and federal laws when making information accessible. Agency agrees that it will comply with applicable state and federal laws when accessing, entering, using, disseminating, and storing data. Each party is responsible for its own compliance with the most current applicable state and federal laws. 2.9 Supersedes prior agreements. This Agreement supersedes any and all prior agreements between the BCA and the Agency regarding access to and use of systems and tools provided by BCA. 2.10 Requirement to update information. The parties agree that if there is a change to any of the information whether required by law or this Agreement, the party will send the new information to the other party in writing within 30 days of the change. This clause does not apply to changes in systems or tools provided under this Agreement. This requirement to give notice additionally applies to changes in the individual or organization serving a city as its prosecutor. Any change in performance of the prosecutorial function must be provided to the BCA in writing by giving notice to the Service Desk, BCA.ServiceDesk@state.mn.us. 2.11 Transaction record. The BCA creates and maintains a transaction record for each exchange of data utilizing its systems and tools. In order to meet FBI-CJIS requirements and to perform the audits described in Clause 7, there must be a method of identifying which individual users at the Agency conducted a particular transaction. If Agency uses either direct access as described in Clause 2.2A or indirect access as described in Clause 2.2B, BCA's transaction record meets FBI-CJIS requirements. When Agency's method of access is a computer to computer interface as described in Clause 2.2C, the Agency must 2 SWIFT Contract # 108228 MN0273000 keep a transaction record sufficient to satisfy FBI-CJIS requirements and permit the audits described in Clause 7 to occur. If an Agency accesses data from the Driver and Vehicle Services Division in the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and keeps a copy of the data, Agency must have a transaction record of all subsequent access to the data that are kept by the Agency. The transaction record must include the individual user who requested access, and the date, time and content of the request. The transaction record must also include the date, time and content of the response along with the destination to which the data were sent. The transaction record must be maintained for a minimum of six (6) years from the date the transaction occurred and must be made available to the BCA within one (1) business day of the BCA's request. 2.12 Court information access. Certain BCA systems and tools that include access to and/or submission of Court Records may only be utilized by the Agency if the Agency completes the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, which upon execution will be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. These BCA systems and tools are identified in the written request made by Agency under Clause 2.6 above. The Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment provides important additional terms, including but not limited to privacy (see Clause 8.2, below), fees (see Clause 3 below), and transaction records or logs, that govern Agency's access to and/or submission of the Court Records delivered through the BCA systems and tools. 2.13 Vendor personnel screening. The BCA will conduct all vendor personnel screening on behalf of Agency as is required by the FBI CJIS Security Policy. The BCA will maintain records of the federal, fingerprint -based background check on each vendor employee as well as records of the completion of the security awareness training that may be relied on by the Agency. 3 Payment The Agency currently accesses the criminal justice data communications network described in Minn. Stat. §299C.46. No charges will be assessed to the agency as a condition of this agreement. If Agency chooses to execute the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment referred to in Clause 2.12 in order to access and/or submit Court Records via BCA's systems, additional fees, if any, are addressed in that amendment. 4 Authorized Representatives The BCA's Authorized Representative is Dana Gotz, Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Minnesota Justice Information Services, 1430 Maryland Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55106, 651-793-1007, or her successor. The Agency's Authorized Representative is Chief Ed Belland, 600 Clydesdale Trail, Medina, MN 55340, (763) 473-9209, or his/her successor. 5 Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete 5.1 Assignment. Neither party may assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement. 5.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement, except those described in Clauses 2.6 and 2.7 above must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been signed and approved by the same parties who signed and approved the original agreement, their successors in office, or another individual duly authorized. 5.3 Waiver. If either party fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or the right to enforce it. 5.4 Contract Complete. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the BCA and the Agency. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 6 Liability Each party will be responsible for its own acts and behavior and the results thereof and shall not be responsible or liable for the other party's actions and consequences of those actions. The Minnesota Torts Claims Act, Minn. Stat. § 3.736 and other applicable laws govern the BCA's liability. The Minnesota Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn Stat. 3 SWIFT Contract # 108228 MN0273000 Ch. 466, governs the Agency's liability. 7 Audits 7.1 Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the Agency's books, records, documents, internal policies and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the BCA, the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement. Under Minn. Stat. § 6.551, the State Auditor may examine the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of BCA. The examination shall be limited to the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices that are relevant to this Agreement. 7.2 Under applicable state and federal law, the Agency's records are subject to examination by the BCA to ensure compliance with laws, regulations and policies about access, use, and dissemination of data. 7.3 If Agency accesses federal databases, the Agency's records are subject to examination by the FBI and Agency will cooperate with FBI examiners and make any requested data available for review and audit. 7.4 To facilitate the audits required by state and federal law, Agency is required to have an inventory of the equipment used to access the data covered by this Agreement and the physical location of each. 8 Government Data Practices 8.1 BCA and Agency. The Agency and BCA must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data accessible under this Agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Agency under this Agreement. The remedies of Minn. Stat. § § 13.08 and 13.09 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Agency or the BCA. 8.2 Court Records. If Agency chooses to execute the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment referred to in Clause 2.12 in order to access and/or submit Court Records via BCA's systems, the following provisions regarding data practices also apply. The Court is not subject to Minn. Stat. Ch. 13 (see section 13.90) but is subject to the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court. All parties acknowledge and agree that Minn Stat. § 13.03, subdivision 4(e) requires that the BCA and the Agency comply with the Rules of Public Access for those data received from Court under the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment. All parties also acknowledge and agree that the use of, access to or submission of Court Records, as that term is defined in the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, may be restricted by rules promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court, applicable state statute or federal law. All parties acknowledge and agree that these applicable restrictions must be followed in the appropriate circumstances. 9 Investigation of alleged violations; sanctions For purposes of this clause, "Individual User" means an employee or contractor of Agency. 9.1 Investigation. Agency and BCA agree to cooperate in the investigation and possible prosecution of suspected violations of federal and state law referenced in this Agreement. Agency and BCA agree to cooperate in the investigation of suspected violations of the policies and procedures referenced in this Agreement. When BCA becomes aware that a violation may have occurred, BCA will inform Agency of the suspected violation, subject to any restrictions in applicable law. When Agency becomes aware that a violation has occurred, Agency will inform BCA subject to any restrictions in applicable law. 9.2 Sanctions Involving Only BCA Systems and Tools. The following provisions apply to BCA systems and tools not covered by the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment. None of these provisions alter the Agency's internal discipline processes, including those governed by a collective bargaining agreement. 9.2.1 For BCA systems and tools that are not covered by the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, Agency 4 SWIFT Contract # 108228 MN0273000 must determine if and when an involved Individual User's access to systems or tools is to be temporarily or permanently eliminated. The decision to suspend or terminate access may be made as soon as alleged violation is discovered, after notice of an alleged violation is received, or after an investigation has occurred. Agency must report the status of the Individual User's access to BCA without delay. BCA reserves the right to make a different determination concerning an Individual User's access to systems or tools than that made by Agency and BCA's determination controls. 9.2.2 If BCA determines that Agency has jeopardized the integrity of the systems or tools covered in this Clause 9.2, BCA may temporarily stop providing some or all the systems or tools under this Agreement until the failure is remedied to the BCA's satisfaction. If Agency's failure is continuing or repeated, Clause 11.1 does not apply and BCA may terminate this Agreement immediately. 9.3 Sanctions Involving Only Court Data Services The following provisions apply to those systems and tools covered by the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, if it has been signed by Agency. As part of the agreement between the Court and the BCA for the delivery of the systems and tools that are covered by the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, BCA is required to suspend or terminate access to or use of the systems and tools either on its own initiative or when directed by the Court. The decision to suspend or terminate access may be made as soon as an alleged violation is discovered, after notice of an alleged violation is received, or after an investigation has occurred. The decision to suspend or terminate may also be made based on a request from the Authorized Representative of Agency. The agreement further provides that only the Court has the authority to reinstate access and use. 9.3.1 Agency understands that if it has signed the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment and if Agency's Individual Users violate the provisions of that Amendment, access and use will be suspended by BCA or Court. Agency also understands that reinstatement is only at the direction of the Court. 9.3.2 Agency further agrees that if Agency believes that one or more of its Individual Users have violated the terms of the Amendment, it will notify BCA and Court so that an investigation as described in Clause 9.1 may occur. 10 Venue Venue for all legal proceedings involving this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 11 Termination 11.1 Termination. The BCA or the Agency may terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the other party's Authorized Representative. 11.2 Termination for Insufficient Funding. Either party may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written notice to the other party's authorized representative. The Agency is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the BCA will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. Neither party will be assessed any penalty if the agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. Notice of the lack of funding must be provided within a reasonable time of the affected party receiving that notice. 12 Continuing obligations The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this Agreement: 6. Liability; 7. Audits; 8. Government Data Practices; 9. Investigation of alleged violations; sanctions; and 10.Venue. 5 SWIFT Contract # 108228 MN0273000 The parties indicate their agreement and authority to execute this Agreement by signing below. 1. AGENCY 2. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION Name: (PRINTED) Name: (PRINTED) Signed: Signed: Title: (with delegated authority) Title: (with delegated authority) Date: Date: 3. COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION Name: delegated to Materials Management Division (PRINTED) Signed: Title: (with delegated authority) Date: By: Date: 6 COURT DATA SERVICES SUBSCRIBER AMENDMENT TO CJDN SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT This Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment ("Subscriber Amendment") is entered into by the State of Minnesota, acting through its Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, ("BCA") and the City of Medina on behalf of its Police Department ("Agency"), and by and for the benefit of the State of Minnesota acting through its State Court Administrator's Office ("Court") who shall be entitled to enforce any provisions hereof through any legal action against any party. Recitals This Subscriber Amendment modifies and supplements the Agreement between the BCA and Agency, SWIFT Contract number 108228, of even or prior date, for Agency use of BCA systems and tools (referred to herein as "the CJDN Subscriber Agreement"). Certain BCA systems and tools that include access to and/or submission of Court Records may only be utilized by the Agency if the Agency completes this Subscriber Amendment. The Agency desires to use one or more BCA systems and tools to access and/or submit Court Records to assist the Agency in the efficient performance of its duties as required or authorized by law or court rule. Court desires to permit such access and/or submission. This Subscriber Amendment is intended to add Court as a party to the CJDN Subscriber Agreement and to create obligations by the Agency to the Court that can be enforced by the Court. It is also understood that, pursuant to the Master Joint Powers Agreement for Delivery of Court Data Services to CJDN Subscribers ("Master Authorization Agreement") between the Court and the BCA, the BCA is authorized to sign this Subscriber Amendment on behalf of Court. Upon execution the Subscriber Amendment will be incorporated into the CJDN Subscriber Agreement by reference. The BCA, the Agency and the Court desire to amend the CJDN Subscriber Agreement as stated below. The CJDN Subscriber Agreement is amended by the addition of the following provisions: 1. TERM; TERMINATION; ONGOING OBLIGATIONS. This Subscriber Amendment shall be effective on the date finally executed by all parties and shall remain in effect until expiration or termination of the CJDN Subscriber Agreement unless terminated earlier as provided in this Subscriber Amendment. Any party may terminate this Subscriber Amendment with or without cause by giving written notice to all other parties. The effective date of the termination shall be thirty days after the other party's receipt of the notice of termination, unless a later date is specified in the notice. The provisions of sections 5 through 9, 12.b., 12.c., and 15 through 24 shall survive any termination of this Subscriber Amendment as shall any other provisions which by their nature are intended or expected to survive such termination. Upon termination, the Subscriber shall perform the responsibilities set forth in paragraph 7(f) hereof. 2. Definitions. Unless otherwise specifically defined, each term used herein shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the CJDN Subscriber Agreement. 1 a. "Authorized Court Data Services" means Court Data Services that have been authorized for delivery to CJDN Subscribers via BCA systems and tools pursuant to an Authorization Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for Delivery of Court Data Services to CJDN Subscribers ("Master Authorization Agreement") between the Court and the BCA. b. "Court Data Services" means one or more of the services set forth on the Justice Agency Resource webpage of the Minnesota Judicial Branch website (for which the current address is www.courts.state.mn.us) or other location designated by the Court, as the same may be amended from time to time by the Court. c. "Court Records" means all information in any form made available by the Court to Subscriber through the BCA for the purposes of carrying out this Subscriber Amendment, including: i. "Court Case Information" means any information in the Court Records that conveys information about a particular case or controversy, including without limitation Court Confidential Case Information, as defined herein. ii. "Court Confidential Case Information" means any information in the Court Records that is inaccessible to the public pursuant to the Rules of Public Access and that conveys information about a particular case or controversy. iii. "Court Confidential Security and Activation Information" means any information in the Court Records that is inaccessible to the public pursuant to the Rules of Public Access and that explains how to use or gain access to Court Data Services, including but not limited to login account names, passwords, TCP/IP addresses, Court Data Services user manuals, Court Data Services Programs, Court Data Services Databases, and other technical information. iv. "Court Confidential Information" means any information in the Court Records that is inaccessible to the public pursuant to the Rules of Public Access, including without limitation both i) Court Confidential Case Information; and ii) Court Confidential Security and Activation Information. d. "DCA" shall mean the district courts of the state of Minnesota and their respective staff. e. "Policies & Notices" means the policies and notices published by the Court in connection with each of its Court Data Services, on a website or other location designated by the Court, as the same may be amended from time to time by the Court. Policies & Notices for each Authorized Court Data Service identified in an approved request form under section 3, below, are hereby made part of this Subscriber Amendment by this reference and provide additional terms and conditions that govern Subscriber's use of Court Records accessed through such services, including but not limited to provisions on access and use limitations. 2 f. "Rules of Public Access" means the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court, as the same may be amended from time to time, including without limitation lists or tables published from time to time by the Court entitled Limits on Public Access to Case Records or Limits on Public Access to Administrative Records, all of which by this reference are made a part of this Subscriber Amendment. It is the obligation of Subscriber to check from time to time for updated rules, lists, and tables and be familiar with the contents thereof. It is contemplated that such rules, lists, and tables will be posted on the Minnesota Judicial Branch website, for which the current address is www.courts.state.mn.us. g• Office. "Court" shall mean the State of Minnesota, State Court Administrator's h. "Subscriber" shall mean the Agency. i. "Subscriber Records" means any information in any form made available by the Subscriber to the Court for the purposes of carrying out this Subscriber Amendment. 3. REQUESTS FOR AUTHORIZED COURT DATA SERVICES. Following execution of this Subscriber Amendment by all parties, Subscriber may submit to the BCA one or more separate requests for Authorized Court Data Services. The BCA is authorized in the Master Authorization Agreement to process, credential and approve such requests on behalf of Court and all such requests approved by the BCA are adopted and incorporated herein by this reference the same as if set forth verbatim herein. a. Activation. Activation of the requested Authorized Court Data Service(s) shall occur promptly following approval. b. Rejection. Requests may be rejected for any reason, at the discretion of the BCA and/or the Court. c. Requests for Termination of One or More Authorized Court Data Services. The Subscriber may request the termination of an Authorized Court Data Services previously requested by submitting a notice to Court with a copy to the BCA. Promptly upon receipt of a request for termination of an Authorized Court Data Service, the BCA will deactivate the service requested. The termination of one or more Authorized Court Data Services does not terminate this Subscriber Amendment. Provisions for termination of this Subscriber Amendment are set forth in section 1. Upon termination of Authorized Court Data Services, the Subscriber shall perform the responsibilities set forth in paragraph 7(f) hereof. 4. SCOPE OF ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS LIMITED. Subscriber's access to and/or submission of the Court Records shall be limited to Authorized Court Data Services identified in an approved request form under section 3, above, and other Court Records necessary for Subscriber to use Authorized Court Data Services. Authorized Court Data Services shall only be used according to the instructions provided in corresponding Policies & Notices or other materials and only as necessary to assist Subscriber in the efficient performance of Subscriber's duties 3 required or authorized by law or court rule in connection with any civil, criminal, administrative, or arbitral proceeding in any Federal, State, or local court or agency or before any self -regulatory body. Subscriber's access to the Court Records for personal or non -official use is prohibited. Subscriber will not use or attempt to use Authorized Court Data Services in any manner not set forth in this Subscriber Amendment, Policies & Notices, or other Authorized Court Data Services documentation, and upon any such unauthorized use or attempted use the Court may immediately terminate this Subscriber Amendment without prior notice to Subscriber. 5. GUARANTEES OF CONFIDENTIALITY. Subscriber agrees: a. To not disclose Court Confidential Information to any third party except where necessary to carry out the Subscriber's duties as required or authorized by law or court rule in connection with any civil, criminal, administrative, or arbitral proceeding in any Federal, State, or local court or agency or before any self -regulatory body. b. To take all appropriate action, whether by instruction, agreement, or otherwise, to insure the protection, confidentiality and security of Court Confidential Information and to satisfy Subscriber's obligations under this Subscriber Amendment. c. To limit the use of and access to Court Confidential Information to Subscriber's bona fide personnel whose use or access is necessary to effect the purposes of this Subscriber Amendment, and to advise each individual who is permitted use of and/or access to any Court Confidential Information of the restrictions upon disclosure and use contained in this Subscriber Amendment, requiring each individual who is permitted use of and/or access to Court Confidential Information to acknowledge in writing that the individual has read and understands such restrictions. Subscriber shall keep such acknowledgements on file for one year following termination of the Subscriber Amendment and/or CJDN Subscriber Agreement, whichever is longer, and shall provide the Court with access to, and copies of, such acknowledgements upon request. For purposes of this Subscriber Amendment, Subscriber's bona fide personnel shall mean individuals who are employees of Subscriber or provide services to Subscriber either on a voluntary basis or as independent contractors with Subscriber. d. That, without limiting section 1 of this Subscriber Amendment, the obligations of Subscriber and its bona fide personnel with respect to the confidentiality and security of Court Confidential Information shall survive the termination of this Subscriber Amendment and the CJDN Subscriber Agreement and the termination of their relationship with Subscriber. e. That, notwithstanding any federal or state law applicable to the nondisclosure obligations of Subscriber and Subscriber's bona fide personnel under this Subscriber Amendment, such obligations of Subscriber and Subscriber's bona fide personnel are founded independently on the provisions of this Subscriber Amendment. 6. APPLICABILITY TO PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED COURT RECORDS. Subscriber acknowledges and agrees that all Authorized Court Data Services and related Court Records disclosed to Subscriber prior to the effective date of this Subscriber Amendment shall be subject to the provisions of this Subscriber Amendment. 4 7. LICENSE AND PROTECTION OF PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. During the term of this Subscriber Amendment, subject to the terms and conditions hereof, the Court hereby grants to Subscriber a nonexclusive, nontransferable, limited license to use Court Data Services Programs and Court Data Services Databases to access or receive the Authorized Court Data Services identified in an approved request form under section 3, above, and related Court Records. Court reserves the right to make modifications to the Authorized Court Data Services, Court Data Services Programs, and Court Data Services Databases, and related materials without notice to Subscriber. These modifications shall be treated in all respects as their previous counterparts. a. Court Data Services Programs. Court is the copyright owner and licensor of the Court Data Services Programs. The combination of ideas, procedures, processes, systems, logic, coherence and methods of operation embodied within the Court Data Services Programs, and all information contained in documentation pertaining to the Court Data Services Programs, including but not limited to manuals, user documentation, and passwords, are trade secret information of Court and its licensors. b. Court Data Services Databases. Court is the copyright owner and licensor of the Court Data Services Databases and of all copyrightable aspects and components thereof. All specifications and information pertaining to the Court Data Services Databases and their structure, sequence and organization, including without limitation data schemas such as the Court XML Schema, are trade secret information of Court and its licensors. c. Marks. Subscriber shall neither have nor claim any right, title, or interest in or use of any trademark used in connection with Authorized Court Data Services, including but not limited to the marks "MNCIS" and "Odyssey." d. Restrictions on Duplication, Disclosure, and Use. Trade secret information of Court and its licensors will be treated by Subscriber in the same manner as Court Confidential Information. In addition, Subscriber will not copy any part of the Court Data Services Programs or Court Data Services Databases, or reverse engineer or otherwise attempt to discern the source code of the Court Data Services Programs or Court Data Services Databases, or use any trademark of Court or its licensors, in any way or for any purpose not specifically and expressly authorized by this Subscriber Amendment. As used herein, "trade secret information of Court and its licensors" means any information possessed by Court which derives independent economic value from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. "Trade secret information of Court and its licensors" does not, however, include information which was known to Subscriber prior to Subscriber's receipt thereof, either directly or indirectly, from Court or its licensors, information which is independently developed by Subscriber without reference to or use of information received from Court or its licensors, or information which would not qualify as a trade secret under Minnesota law. It will not be a violation of this section 7, sub -section d, for Subscriber to make up to one copy of training materials and configuration documentation, if any, for each individual authorized to access, use, or configure Authorized Court Data Services, solely for its own use in connection with this Subscriber Amendment. Subscriber will take all steps reasonably necessary to protect the copyright, trade secret, and trademark rights of Court and its licensors and Subscriber will advise its bona fide personnel who are permitted access to any of the Court Data Services Programs and Court Data Services Databases, and trade secret information of Court and its licensors, of the restrictions upon duplication, disclosure and use contained in this Subscriber Amendment. 5 e. Proprietary Notices. Subscriber will not remove any copyright or proprietary notices included in and/or on the Court Data Services Programs or Court Data Services Databases, related documentation, or trade secret information of Court and its licensors, or any part thereof, made available by Court directly or through the BCA, if any, and Subscriber will include in and/or on any copy of the Court Data Services Programs or Court Data Services Databases, or trade secret information of Court and its licensors and any documents pertaining thereto, the same copyright and other proprietary notices as appear on the copies made available to Subscriber by Court directly or through the BCA, except that copyright notices shall be updated and other proprietary notices added as may be appropriate. f. Title; Return. The Court Data Services Programs and Court Data Services Databases, and related documentation, including but not limited to training and configuration material, if any, and logon account information and passwords, if any, made available by the Court to Subscriber directly or through the BCA and all copies, including partial copies, thereof are and remain the property of the respective licensor. Except as expressly provided in section 12.b., within ten days of the effective date of termination of this Subscriber Amendment or the CJDN Subscriber Agreement or within ten days of a request for termination of Authorized Court Data Service as described in section 4, Subscriber shall either: (i) uninstall and return any and all copies of the applicable Court Data Services Programs and Court Data Services Databases, and related documentation, including but not limited to training and configuration materials, if any, and logon account information, if any; or (2) destroy the same and certify in writing to the Court that the same have been destroyed. 8. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Subscriber acknowledges that the Court, Court's licensors, and DCA will be irreparably harmed if Subscriber's obligations under this Subscriber Amendment are not specifically enforced and that the Court, Court's licensors, and DCA would not have an adequate remedy at law in the event of an actual or threatened violation by Subscriber of its obligations. Therefore, Subscriber agrees that the Court, Court's licensors, and DCA shall be entitled to an injunction or any appropriate decree of specific performance for any actual or threatened violations or breaches by Subscriber or its bona fide personnel without the necessity of the Court, Court's licensors, or DCA showing actual damages or that monetary damages would not afford an adequate remedy. Unless Subscriber is an office, officer, agency, department, division, or bureau of the state of Minnesota, Subscriber shall be liable to the Court, Court's licensors, and DCA for reasonable attorneys fees incurred by the Court, Court's licensors, and DCA in obtaining any relief pursuant to this Subscriber Amendment. 9. LIABILITY. Subscriber and the Court agree that, except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each party will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of any others and the results thereof. Liability shall be governed by applicable law. Without limiting the foregoing, liability of the Court and any Subscriber that is an office, officer, agency, department, division, or bureau of the state of Minnesota shall be governed by the provisions of the Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes, section 3.376, and other applicable law. Without limiting the foregoing, if Subscriber is a political subdivision of the state of Minnesota, liability of the Subscriber shall be governed by the provisions of Minn. Stat. Ch. 466 (Tort Liability, Political Subdivisions) or other applicable law. Subscriber and Court further acknowledge that the liability, if any, of the BCA is governed by a separate agreement between the Court and the BCA dated December 13, 2010 with DPS-M -0958. 6 10. AVAILABILITY. Specific terms of availability shall be established by the Court and communicated to Subscriber by the Court and/or the BCA. The Court reserves the right to terminate this Subscriber Amendment immediately and/or temporarily suspend Subscriber's Authorized Court Data Services in the event the capacity of any host computer system or legislative appropriation of funds is determined solely by the Court to be insufficient to meet the computer needs of the courts served by the host computer system. 11. [reserved] 12. ADDITIONAL USER OBLIGATIONS. The obligations of the Subscriber set forth in this section are in addition to the other obligations of the Subscriber set forth elsewhere in this Subscriber Amendment. a. Judicial Policy Statement. Subscriber agrees to comply with all policies identified in Policies & Notices applicable to Court Records accessed by Subscriber using Authorized Court Data Services. Upon failure of the Subscriber to comply with such policies, the Court shall have the option of immediately suspending the Subscriber's Authorized Court Data Services on a temporary basis and/or immediately terminating this Subscriber Amendment. b. Access and Use; Log. Subscriber shall be responsible for all access to and use of Authorized Court Data Services and Court Records by Subscriber's bona fide personnel or by means of Subscriber's equipment or passwords, whether or not Subscriber has knowledge of or authorizes such access and use. Subscriber shall also maintain a log identifying all persons to whom Subscriber has disclosed its Court Confidential Security and Activation Information, such as user ID(s) and password(s), including the date of such disclosure. Subscriber shall maintain such logs for a minimum period of six years from the date of disclosure, and shall provide the Court with access to, and copies of, such logs upon request. The Court may conduct audits of Subscriber's logs and use of Authorized Court Data Services and Court Records from time to time. Upon Subscriber's failure to maintain such logs, to maintain accurate logs, or to promptly provide access by the Court to such logs, the Court may terminate this Subscriber Amendment without prior notice to Subscriber. c. Personnel. Subscriber agrees to investigate, at the request of the Court and/or the BCA, allegations of misconduct pertaining to Subscriber's bona fide personnel having access to or use of Authorized Court Data Services, Court Confidential Information, or trade secret information of the Court and its licensors where such persons are alleged to have violated the provisions of this Subscriber Amendment, Policies & Notices, Judicial Branch policies, or other security requirements or laws regulating access to the Court Records. d. Minnesota Data Practices Act Applicability. If Subscriber is a Minnesota Government entity that is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, Subscriber acknowledges and agrees that: (1) the Court is not subject to Minn. Stat. Ch. 13 (see section 13.90) but is subject to the Rules of Public Access and other rules promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court; (2) Minn. Stat. section 13.03, subdivision 4(e) requires that Subscriber comply with the Rules of Public Access and other rules promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court for access to Court Records provided via the 7 BCA systems and tools under this Subscriber Amendment; (3) the use of and access to Court Records may be restricted by rules promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court, applicable state statute or federal law; and (4) these applicable restrictions must be followed in the appropriate circumstances. 13. FEES; INVOICES. Unless the Subscriber is an office, officer, department, division, agency, or bureau of the state of Minnesota, Subscriber shall pay the fees, if any, set forth in applicable Policies & Notices, together with applicable sales, use or other taxes. Applicable monthly fees commence ten (10) days after notice of approval of the request pursuant to section 3 of this Subscriber Amendment or upon the initial Subscriber transaction as defined in the Policies & Notices, whichever occurs earlier. When fees apply, the Court shall invoice Subscriber on a monthly basis for charges incurred in the preceding month and applicable taxes, if any, and payment of all amounts shall be due upon receipt of invoice. If all amounts are not paid within 30 days of the date of the invoice, the Court may immediately cancel this Subscriber Amendment without notice to Subscriber and pursue all available legal remedies. Subscriber certifies that funds have been appropriated for the payment of charges under this Subscriber Amendment for the current fiscal year, if applicable. 14. MODIFICATION OF FEES. Court may modify the fees by amending the Policies & Notices as provided herein, and the modified fees shall be effective on the date specified in the Policies & Notices, which shall not be less than thirty days from the publication of the Policies & Notices. Subscriber shall have the option of accepting such changes or terminating this Subscriber Amendment as provided in section 1 hereof. 15. WARRANTY DISCLAIMERS. a. WARRANTY EXCLUSIONS. EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY PROVIDED HEREIN, COURT, COURT'S LICENSORS, AND DCA MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, NOR ARE ANY WARRANTIES TO BE IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION, SERVICES OR COMPUTER PROGRAMS MADE AVAILABLE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. b. ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF INFORMATION. WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPH, COURT, COURT'S LICENSORS, AND DCA MAKE NO WARRANTIES AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE COURT RECORDS. 16. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES. Subscriber is an independent contractor and shall not be deemed for any purpose to be an employee, partner, agent or franchisee of the Court, Court's licensors, or DCA. Neither Subscriber nor the Court, Court's licensors, or DCA shall have the right nor the authority to assume, create or incur any liability or obligation of any kind, express or implied, against or in the name of or on behalf of the other. 17. NOTICE. Except as provided in section 2 regarding notices of or modifications to Authorized Court Data Services and Policies & Notices, any notice to Court or Subscriber 8 hereunder shall be deemed to have been received when personally delivered in writing or seventy- two (72) hours after it has been deposited in the United States mail, first class, proper postage prepaid, addressed to the party to whom it is intended at the address set forth on page one of this Agreement or at such other address of which notice has been given in accordance herewith. 18. NON -WAIVER. The failure by any party at any time to enforce any of the provisions of this Subscriber Amendment or any right or remedy available hereunder or at law or in equity, or to exercise any option herein provided, shall not constitute a waiver of such provision, remedy or option or in any way affect the validity of this Subscriber Amendment. The waiver of any default by either Parry shall not be deemed a continuing waiver, but shall apply solely to the instance to which such waiver is directed. 19. FORCE MAJEURE. Neither Subscriber nor Court shall be responsible for failure or delay in the performance of their respective obligations hereunder caused by acts beyond their reasonable control. 20. SEVERABILITY. Every provision of this Subscriber Amendment shall be construed, to the extent possible, so as to be valid and enforceable. If any provision of this Subscriber Amendment so construed is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable, such provision shall be deemed severed from this Subscriber Amendment, and all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 21. ASSIGNMENT AND BINDING EFFECT. Except as otherwise expressly permitted herein, neither Subscriber nor Court may assign, delegate and/or otherwise transfer this Subscriber Amendment or any of its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other. This Subscriber Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, including any other legal entity into, by or with which Subscriber may be merged, acquired or consolidated. 22. GOVERNING LAW. This Subscriber Amendment shall in all respects be governed by and interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the United States and of the State of Minnesota. 23. VENUE AND JURISDICTION. Any action arising out of or relating to this Subscriber Amendment, its performance, enforcement or breach will be venued in a state or federal court situated within the State of Minnesota. Subscriber hereby irrevocably consents and submits itself to the personal jurisdiction of said courts for that purpose. 24. INTEGRATION. This Subscriber Amendment contains all negotiations and agreements between the parties. No other understanding regarding this Subscriber Amendment, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party, provided that all terms and conditions of the CJDN Subscriber Agreement and all previous amendments remain in full force and effect except as supplemented or modified by this Subscriber Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have, by their duly authorized officers, executed this Subscriber Amendment in duplicate, intending to be bound thereby. 9 Name: Jodi M. Gallup (PRINTED) Signed: Title: _City Clerk (with delegated authority) Date: 1. SUBSCRIBER (AGENCY) 2. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION Subscriber must attach written verification of authority to sign on behalf of and bind the entity, Name: such as an opinion of counsel or resolution. (PRINTED) Name: _Bob Mitchell Signed: (PRINTED) Signed: Title: (with delegated authority) Title: Mayor Date: (with delegated authority) Date: 3. COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION delegated to Materials Management Division By: Date: 4. COURTS Authority granted to Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Name: (PRINTED) Signed: Title: (with authorized authority) Date: 10 Agenda Item # 5F MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE: May 3, 2016 SUBJ: Approval of bid results for the Medina City Hall Lower Level Renovation project Background On April 26, 2016 six (6) bids were received for the Medina City Hall Lower Level Renovation project. The base bid amounts are as follows: • Iwaye and Associates - $240,000 • JS Cates Cates - $253,000 • American Liberty Construction- $257,400 • Dering Pierson Group - $268,900 • Ebert Construction - $288,300 • Rochon Corporation - $289,000 Of the six bids received, the low base bid was submitted by Iwaye and Associates. Based upon the review of their bid documents, confirmation from the company that the base bid amount submitted is valid and affirmation the scheduled substantial completion date of September 30, 2016 can be met, AFO Consultants provided the following summary and recommendation with regard to the award of the contract: • Base Bid (Ewaye and Associates) $240,000.00 • Unit Price #1- VCT supply and installation $4.00/cost per square foot installed • Unit Price #2 — Remedial floor coating $8.00/cost per square foot installed There are no additions or deductions to the base bid, therefore, the total construction contract award amount is $240,000.00. The cost estimate from The 292 Design Group was for $242,000 for the lower level renovation project. The remodel will open up space for Planning, Building, and Public Works staff in the old Police Department space in the basement of City Hall. Much of the project cost involves providing badly needed restrooms, a break area, and meeting space. The space vacated upstairs by Planning, Building, and Public Works will be utilized by the Finance Department. The proposed plans will accommodate future space needs for the City. The bid does not include furniture, HVAC work for the Council Chambers, painting/new carpet in the upstairs office areas, and replacing old wiring for communications/IT. Staff will ask for Council approval separately on these items. Staff will work with The 292 Design Group and AFO Consultants to review the project with the contractor to value engineer the project and get the best value possible. The contract with Iwaye and Associates will be brought forward for Council approval at a future meeting. Recommended Motion: Approve bid for the total construction contract award amount of $240,000.00 from Iwaye and Associates Attachments 1. Budget Estimate for Lower Level Renovations 2. AFO Consultants Letter 2 Medina City Hall Lower Level Renovations Budget Estimate 31-Mar-16 Architectural work $ 106,900 Demo/Concrete cut/fill $ 12,800 Carpentry/casework $ 11,700 Ext. wall (HVAC penetrations) $ 2,500 Doors/windows/glass $ 19,700 Drywall (walls, soffits) $ 22,000 Ceramic tile $ 7,300 Flooring (carpet/VCT) $ 12,500 Acoustical tile $ 4,000 Painting $ 7,000 Accessories $ 7,400 Mechanical work $ 49,200 Plumbing $ 16,400 HVAC $ 32,800 Electrical work $ 39,300 Demo/temps/gen.cond. $ 4,800 Lighting/controls $ 17,900 Power/devices $ 8,600 Data (conduit only) $ 3,500 Systems (FA, sound) $ 4,500 Subtotal $ 195,400 Contractor fee/O&P $ 19,500 General Conditions $ 15,600 Total $ 230,500 Contingency (5%) $ 11,500 Total $ 242,000 AFO Consultants Advocates For Owners Scott Johnson City of Medina City Administrator 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 RE: Medina City Hall — Lower Level Renovation Dear Scott: On April 26, six (6) bids were received for the bid of the Medina City Hall Lower Level Renovation project. The base bid amounts are as follows: Iwaye and Associates - $240,000 JS Cates Cates - $253,000 American Liberty Construction- $257,400 Dering Pierson Group - $268,900 Ebert Construction - $288,300 Rochon Corporation - $289,000 Of the six bids received, the low base bid was submitted by Iwaye and Associates. Based upon the review of their bid documents, confirmation from the company that the base bid amount submitted is valid and affirmation the scheduled substantial completion date of September 30, 2016 can be met, we provide the following summary and recommendation with regard to the award of the contract: Base Bid (Ewaye and Associates) Unit Price #1- VCT supply and installation Unit Price #2 — Remedial floor coating $240,000.00 $4.00/cost per square foot installed $8.00/cost per square foot installed There are no additions or deductions to the base bid, therefore, the total construction contract award amount is $240,000.00. Sincerely, Jeanne Qualley Principal Cc: Pam Anderson, 292 Design Group Owner's Representative Project Management Strategic Planning P.O. Box #431112 Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 763.515.4126 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Jim Stremel, Assistant City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2016 MEETING: May 3, 2016 SUBJECT: Arrowhead Drive Trail Extension Project - Bid Acceptance & Award Background: On March 15, 2016 the City Council adopted a resolution approving the Arrowhead Drive Trail Extension Project plans and specifications and authorizing advertising for bids. Bids were opened at 11:00 am on April 21, 2016. Three bids were opened with the low bid submitted by Barber Construction, Inc. in the amount of $174,572.00. The low bid is approximately 8.9% below the engineer's estimate of $191,700.00. The contractor provided references for projects in the cities of Coon Rapids, Maple Grove, and Brooklyn Park. The references were followed up on and the contractor performed well on those projects. In the interest of conserving paper we have not attached the Project Bid Abstract to this memo. A copy of the Project Bid Abstract is available at City Hall for your review. City Council Action Requested: Adopt the Resolution accepting the low bid and awarding the contract to Barber Construction, Inc. for the Arrowhead Drive Trail Extension Project in the amount of $174,572.00. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING THE CONTRACT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Arrowhead Drive Trail Extension Project, the construction of a new trail on the east side of Arrowhead Drive, by grading and placing bituminous pavement, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to the law, and the following three bids were received complying with the advertisement: Grand Total Bid Barber Construction, Inc. Sunram Construction, Inc. G.L. Contracting, Inc. $174,572.00 $180,552.00 $229,947.95 WHEREAS, it appears that Barber Construction, Inc. of St. Bonifacious, MN is the lowest responsible bidder for the Grand Total Bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Barber Construction, Inc. in the name of the City of Medina for the construction of a new trail on the east side of Arrowhead Drive, by grading and placing bituminous trail pavement, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Administrator. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Dated: May 3, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Resolution No. 2016- May 3, 2016 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016- 2 May 3, 2016 - WSB && Assoc- engineering • planning • environmental • construction Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor Mitchell and Medina City Council Members From: Dustin Simonson, WSB & Associates, Inc. CC: Dusty Finke, City of Medina Date: April 21, 2016 Re: Arrowhead Drive Trail — Wetland Replacement Plan City Project No. WF-16-069 WSB Project No. 2712-840 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 The Arrowhead Drive Trail project will result in a total of 0.05 acres of wetland impact to one wetland. The prosed impacts are from the construction of an eight foot wide 3025 foot long multiuse trail along the east side of Arrowhead Drive between Meander Road and Bridgewater Road. Replacement is proposed at a 2:1 ratio through wetland banking credits. 0.10 acres of wet to wet mesic prairie wetland credit will be purchased from bank no. 1518, located in Hennepin County, Major Watershed 20, and Bank Service Area 7. The application was noticed to the Wetland Conservation Act Technical Evaluation Panel on March 22, 2016. Comments were allowed until April 14, 2016. No TEP comments were received during this time. On behalf of the City of Medina, Local Government Unit for the Wetland Conservation Act, I recommend that the City Council approves the wetland replacement plan for the Arrowhead Drive Trail. A Notice of Decision is attached for review and signature. Attached Notice of Decision Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com 1002712-840\Admin\Permits \MEMO - Medina Mayor & CC - NOD - DRAFT.docz Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) City of Medina Address 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN 55340 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Application City of Medina (Steve Scherer) 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Arrowhead Drive Trail 3/18/16 Number WF-16-069 (2712-840) a Attach site locator map. Type of Decision: ❑ Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No -Loss ® Replacement Plan ❑ Exemption ❑ Banking Plan ❑ Sequencing Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation (if any): ® Approve ❑ Approve with conditions Summary (or attach): No TEP comments were received during the comment period. Deny 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 05/03/16 ® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): The City of Medina has applied for a wetland replacement plan for impacts associated with the Arrowhead Drive Trail project located along the east side of Arrowhead Drive between Meander Road and Chippewa Road in Medina, MN (Section 2 & 3, T118N, R23W; Hennepin County). A wetland delineation was conducted by WSB & Associates, Inc. on September 9, 2015. This delineation was approved on November 9, 2015 and used to determine wetland impacts as part of this project. The Arrowhead Drive Trail project is an 8 foot wide 3025 foot long multi -use trail. The trail will impact 0.05 acres of wetland impacts to a single wetland. Wetland impacts are proposed to be mitigated for at a 2:1 ratio through wetland banking from bank 1518 located within Hennepin county, Major Watershed 20, Bank Service Area 7. For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 Bank Account # Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: n Financial Assurance: For project -specific replacement that is not in -advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). n Deed Recording: For project -specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ® Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Dustin Simonson Title Environmental Scientist Signature Date 05/03/16 Phone Number and E-mail 763-270-3475 dsimonson@wsbeng.com THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ❑ Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send petition and $500 fee (if applicable) to: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 ® Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski, Stacey.Lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us ® BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer, Ben.Meyer@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): ® DNR TEP member: Leslie Parris, Leslie.Parris@state.mn.us n DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) ® WD or WMO (if applicable): Jim Kujawa, James.Kujawa@co.hennepine.mn.us ® Applicant (notice only) and Landowner (if different) Steve Scherer, Steve.Scherer@ci.mendia.mn.us ® Members of the public who requested notice (notice only): Laura Messman, lmessman@wsbeng.com, Dusty Finke, Dusty.Finke@ci.medina.mn.us ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager (notice only) Melissa Jenny, Melissa.M.Jenny@usace.army.mil n BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan applications only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA_areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE Bemidji, MN 56601 Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1201 E. Hwy. 2 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: u BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 Agenda Item # 7A Member _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-xx RECOGNIZING DUSTY FINKE FOR TEN YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF MEDINA WHEREAS, Dusty Finke has been a valued full time City of Medina employee in the Planning Department of the City since May 1, 2006; and WHEREAS, Dusty has served as the City Planner at the City of Medina for nearly seven years, and has also served the City as an Associate Planner, Assistant to Planning, Office Assistant, and Administration Intern; and WHEREAS, Dusty has previously served and provided leadership as the City's Election Coordinator; and WHEREAS, Dusty has coordinated the completion of the City's 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan, is currently leading the coordination and completion of the City's 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan and created various accompanying official controls including land use ordinances and development related administrative procedures; and WHEREAS, Dusty has integrated the use of technology in the permitting process of building permits and Laserfiche for electronic records; and WHEREAS, Dusty provided leadership in the development of the Open Systems International, Inc. project, including innovative implementation of a collaborative fast -track review process and has guided the City through the addition of 569 housing units and 19 New Commercial Construction starts; and WHEREAS, Dusty has demonstrated initiative to advance his professional development and obtained his Master's Degree in Public Policy from the University of Minnesota Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs with the assistance of the City's Continuing Education Program and has attained AICP planning certification and other professional credentials; and WHEREAS, Dusty has implemented various programs and processes including on -going septic system monitoring, conditional use permit inspections, and code enforcement; and WHEREAS, the City of Medina expresses sincere gratitude for Dusty's great work ethic, dedication, leadership, and continued service to the Medina community NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Medina acknowledges and thanks Dusty Finke for ten years of service to the community. Dated: May 3, 2016. Resolution No. 2016-xx May 3, 2016 Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-xx 2 May 3, 2016 Agenda Item # 8A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: April 28, 2016 MEETING: May 3, 2016 City Council SUBJ: Wealshire of Medina — Rezoning, Site Plan Review — PID 03-118-23-24-0003 Background The Wealshire of Bloomington proposes to construct a 163,000 s.f. one-story (w/ partial lower level), 150-resident memory care facility at the northwest corner of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road. The applicant currently operates a facility in Bloomington and previously operated the Wealstead of Rogers. The Planning Commission and City Council reviewed the applicants request last year and was never officially approved. The applicant has subsequently updated the plans mid -way through the process in order to cut costs from the project. As such, staff has reviewed the updated plans for consistency with relevant codes. The primary changes from the earlier version reviewed by the Commission and Council is to eliminate the underground parking from the plans and to provide additional surface parking. The applicant determined that the underground parking was cost prohibitive. This change also adjusted the orientation of the loading dock slightly, although it would still be in approximately the same location and located behind an 8-10 foot tall retaining wall and berm. The applicant proposes to construct the project in phases, with 115,000 s.f. supporting 84 resident rooms in Phase I. The applicant intends to begin construction on Phase I this summer. Staff recommends reviewing the entire project so that the applicant would not need to seek a future Site Plan Review approval to construct a future phase if requested within a reasonable amount of time. Various land use approvals would be necessary to permit the construction proposed by the applicant: 1) Rezoning the property from its current Rural Residential -Urban Reserve (RR-UR) designation to the Business Park district. 2) Site Plan Review for construction of a new commercial building. The City approved of a Comprehensive Plan amendment at the end of 2014 to re -guide the subject site General Business (rather than Low Density Residential) to permit the proposed use. This amendment has been approved by the Metropolitan Council, but it is not in effect until this proposed development is carried through with. The subject site is predominantly tilled farm land. A wetland bisects the property west -to -east into a northern portion and a southern portion. The applicant proposes to develop the northern Wealshire of Medina Page 1 of 8 May 3, 2016 Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Interim Use Permit City Council Meeting portion of the site. The site slopes from the northwest corner down to the wetland in the center of the site. Polaris's corporate headquarters is located to the south of the site and remaining surrounding uses are rural residential. However, property to the west, north, and east is all planned for future low -density residential development. An aerial of the site can be found below. Rezoning The applicant requests a rezoning to the Business Park (BP) zoning district. This rezoning was contemplated and expected when the City reviewed the Comprehensive Plan amendment. The BP district is the less -intensive district which is meant to implement the General Business land use of the Comprehensive Plan. The other choice would be the Business district, which permits more intensive uses, taller structures, and requires smaller setbacks. According to Section 832.1.01, "the purpose of the BP district is to provide an attractive, high quality business park primarily for office, high quality manufacturing and assembly, and non - retail uses in developments which provide a harmonious transition to residential development and neighborhoods by: 1) conducting all business activities and essentially all storage inside buildings, 2) consisting of low profile, high quality and attractive buildings which blend in with Wealshire of Medina Page 2 of 8 Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Interim Use Permit May 3, 2016 City Council Meeting the environment, 3) providing open space, quality landscaping and berming which achieve a park -like setting; 4) including berming and buffering of parking, loading docks and other similar functions; and 5) protecting and enhancing the natural environment." According to Section 825.35, "the [City] may adopt amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and zoning map. Such amendments shall not be issued indiscriminately but shall only be used as a means to reflect changes in the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Plan or changes in conditions in the City." Staff believes the proposed rezoning is consistent with the new land use designation of General Business. The BP zoning district is intended to apply to General Business property adjacent to residential uses as a transition to more intensive zoning districts. Site Plan Review Section 825.55 requires Site Plan Review approval prior to issuance of permits for new commercial developments to determine whether it is consistent with relevant requirements. The following review of the Site Plan is based on the requirements of the BP district, contingent upon the City adopting the Comprehensive Plan amendment and Rezoning discussed above. Proposed Use The applicant proposes a memory care facility, specializing in dementia and Alzheimer's care. Such facilities are licensed as housing with services establishments (assisted living facilities). "Nursing homes and assisted living facilities" are a permitted use in the BP district. Setbacks/Lot Dimensions The following table summarizes the requirements of the BP district and the proposed construction. The proposed construction appears to meet all of the dimensional standards, provided a 70% opaque landscaping screen is provided along the north (residential zoning district). Business Park Requirement Proposed Minimum Lot Area 3 acres 17.59 acres Minimum Lot Width 200 feet 1413 feet Minimum Lot Depth 200 feet 2608 feet Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet 90 feet Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback 30 feet 137 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 83 feet Street Setback 50 feet 90 feet Setback from Residential 100 feet; or 75 feet (w/ 70% opaque landscaping) 83 feet (north) 137 feet (west) Minimum Parking Setbacks Front Yard Rear/Interior Side Yards Residential 35 feet 20 feet 100 ft;or 60 (w/ 70% opaque) 35 feet 60 feet 60 feet Maximum Impervious Surface 70% 26.8% Wealshire of Medina Page 3 of 8 Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Interim Use Permit May 3, 2016 City Council Meeting Wetlands/Floodplain There is a wetland basin in the center of the property which includes "fingers" to the northwest, northeast, southwest and southeast. The applicant proposes 1.39 acres of wetland impacts, including filling the northwestern and northeastern "fingers" and additional impacts along the northern edge of the larger basin. The applicant proposes to mitigate the wetland impacts on site by expanding the larger wetland to the south of the proposed building. This mitigation will provide 2:1 replacement, resulting in a larger basin upon completion. The City Council approved the wetland replacement plan at the April 5 meeting. The wetlands are identified as Manage 2, requiring an upland buffer with an average width of 25 feet. Staff recommends a condition that these buffers be installed around the entire wetland, including on the south side of the larger wetland. The applicant will also need to provide required easements and signage. FEMA floodplain maps show no floodplains on the subject property. Stormwater/LID The applicant proposes a series of biofiltration basins throughout the property in order to meet City volume control and water quality standards. A pond to the southwest of the building will meet rate control standards. The applicant is proposing to utilize curb cuts and swales to convey much of the parking lot runoff to the stormwater system rather than pipes. Building Materials The applicant proposes stucco exterior building materials with some stone and brick accents. The roof materials are proposed to be asphalt shingles. These building materials provide more of a residential feel than a commercial building (although obviously the scale is substantially greater). The BP district requires a minimum of 20% brick, stone or stucco and the plan meets the standard. Building Modulation The BP zoning code states that "buildings shall be designed to avoid long, monotonous building walls. Modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building materials/design. Generally, a particular building elevation shall include a minimum of one element of modulation per 100 feet of horizontal length, or portion thereof." The proposed building design includes various modulation techniques including varying roof pitches, varying building setbacks, courtyards, and some material differentiation. Building Fenestration The BP code states that "building elevations which face a public street shall include generous window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when windows are not practical." Staff believes the eastern elevation includes generous window coverage. Multi -sided Architecture The BP code requires that "any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street or a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality generally Wealshire of Medina Page 4 of 8 May 3, 2016 Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Interim Use Permit City Council Meeting associated with a front facade." The western facade, which faces residential property, appears to have fewer accents than the north and east facades. Tree Preservation/Landscaping The subject property is farmed and includes almost no trees. A single tree is proposed to be removed, and it is not significant and not regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance Landscaping requirements are based upon the lot perimeter, including: 1) 1 overstory tree per 50 feet of perimeter 2) 1 ornamental tree per 100 feet of perimeter 3) 1 shrub per 30 feet of perimeter The minimum code requirement would be 59 overstory trees, 30 ornamental trees, and 99 shrubs. In addition to this landscaping, the site requires a vegetative screen to the north in order to allow a 75 foot setback. It appears that the proposed planting plans meets the minimum standards noted above. The Planning Commission had also requested additional landscaping east of the parking lot to break up the appearance of the large parking lot. The applicant proposes an additional 100 shrubs (above the minimum) to the east of the parking lot in order to meet this request. The applicant also does not propose to landscape the southern 3 acres of the site, south of the wetland. The applicant proposes for landscaping to occur in this location when construction is proposed. Staff believes this is reasonable, and recommends a condition noting this requirement. The area will need to be seeded and established in order to prevent erosion. A minimum of 8% of the total land area of parking lots and loading dock areas are required to be landscaped. The site plan provides 8.00% of this area as landscaping. Transportation The applicant proposes to access the facility with a driveway approximately 1100 feet north of Chippewa Road, 650 feet south of Pawnee Road. The applicant also shows a fire lane connection on the south of the building. The proposed parking lot connects with this fire lane in order to allow an exit from this parking lot. Staff recommends that this fire lane be signed "Emergency Access Only" from Mohawk, so as to encourage all traffic to enter at the main entrance, where there will potentially be future turn lanes. The City Engineer does not believe the expected traffic generation from the site would trigger the need for turn lane improvements at this time. However, assuming traffic from Phase II and traffic increases with surrounding future development, the development of this site will likely require turn lanes or bypass lanes, likely in connection with improvements for development to the east. Rather than require the improvements today, staff recommends a condition that the applicant enter into an agreement with the City to potentially construct in the future. Mohawk Drive is restricted to a right-in/right-out at Highway 55. Anyone desiring to go east would first need to head west almost a mile. Police raised concerns related to this limitation. The City plans for a future extension of Chippewa Road to Arrowhead Drive. Staff recommends Wealshire of Medina Page 5 of 8 May 3, 2016 Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Interim Use Permit City Council Meeting a condition that the development agreement include a provision related to future assessments to the property if the City constructs this project in the future. Off -Street Parking The applicant proposes 103 parking spaces, located generally in front of the building. City minimum parking standards do not list assisted living/nursing homes specifically. Code requires 1 stall per 2 beds for hospitals, 1 stall per 250 feet of office and requires that "uses not specifically noted" provide parking "as determined by the City Council following review by the Planning Commission." Using the hospital standard, minimum parking requirements would be 75 stalls (150 beds/2) + 1 stall per 250 s.f. of office. With the proposed parking of 103 stalls, administrative offices would be limited to 7,000 square feet. Staff believes the parking needs for an assisted living would likely be lower than a hospital. Staffing may be comparable per bed, but expected visitation would be lower. The applicant estimates approximately 175 employees, but only around 60 expected on the largest shift. This would leave 43 stalls for guests and visitors. Staff believes the proposed 103 parking stalls would support the proposal. Sewer/Water The applicant proposes to extend sewer and water infrastructure from the intersection of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road to the northern property line. The applicant also proposes to stub a watermain to the west in order to permit future looping. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant provides adequate easements over all public utilities, which may necessitate shifting the proposed monument sign. The applicant has questioned the number of SAC units assigned to the building by the Metropolitan Council and submitted water usage data from their Bloomington facility suggesting lower usage by approximately 30%. Staff has suggested the possibility of an agreement with the property owner which states that the City would collect a lower fee based on the suggested water usage, but would allow the City to collect the higher fee if actual water usage is higher when the facility begins operation. Loading Docks The applicant will accept deliveries in the underground parking area, which will serve as their loading dock. The district limits the loading dock area to 10% of the building perimeter, and this single dock is well below that threshold. Loading docks within 300 feet of residential property is required to be separated from residential property by the building or a wing wall, unless the City approves other alternatives for noise abatement and screening. In this case, the loading dock sits behind a 10-foot tall retaining wall/berm from the east and a proposed 5 foot berm with substantial landscaping from the north. Staff believes this is adequate, especially considering it is a single loading dock. Wealshire of Medina Page 6 of 8 May 3, 2016 Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Interim Use Permit City Council Meeting Utilities/Mechanical Equipment/Trash and Recycling All utilities are required to be underground. Transformers and mechanical equipment is required to be screened with walls or opaque landscaping. The applicant proposes to place this equipment in the area of the entrance to the underground parking/loading dock area, which will be screened with walls. Trash and recycling is required to be within the principal structure, within an accessory structure, or within an enclosed area adjacent to the structure. The applicant proposes to store these in the loading dock area which is acceptable. Review Criteria/Planning Commission Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review the requests in the following order: 1) Rezoning from RR-UR to Business Park; 2) Site Plan Review. Rezoning A rezoning is a legislative decision on which the City has a great deal of discretion. As noted above, a rezoning "shall not be issued indiscriminately but shall only be used as a means to reflect changes in the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Plan or changes in conditions in the City." The Planning Commission found the proposed rezoning is consistent with the recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and recommends approval. Site Plan Review A Site Plan Review is a quasi-judicial act on which the City has a relatively low level of discretion. The purpose of the review is to ensure development is consistent with the standards of the zoning ordinance and other City policy. The City may attach conditions with approval of a Site Plan Review to ensure consistency with City requirements and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. The Planning Commission found that, subject to the conditions suggested below, the proposal is consistent with City requirements and recommended approval. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the updated site plan at their March 2016 meeting. The Commission recommended more landscaping be shifted to the east side of the site to mitigate the impact of the larger parking lot. Following review, the Commission unanimously recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall construct the improvements as displayed on the plans received by the City on 1/19/2016 and 3/3/2016, except as modified herein. 2) This approval shall be valid for one calendar year for Phase I and three calendar years for Phase II. The applicant may request a permit to construct Phase II within this time frame without obtaining Site Plan Review approval. 3) This approval is contingent upon approval of a wetland replacement plan for wetland impacts. 4) The applicant shall grant an additional 3 feet of right-of-way to the City as well as easements over all public utility improvements. The applicant shall also grant additional right-of-way if necessary for future bypass/turn-lane improvements at the proposed entrance. 5) The applicant shall meet the recommendations of the City Engineer dated 4/27/2016. Wealshire of Medina Page 7 of 8 May 3, 2016 Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Interim Use Permit City Council Meeting 6) Upland buffers shall be established fully around all wetland areas, including required vegetation, signage and easements. 7) No tree planting has been required for the area south of the wetland. This area shall be landscaped consistent with City requirements upon future development. Landscaping plans shall identify proposed ground cover in this location. 8) In lieu of constructing improvements to Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road to support the proposed development, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City related to proportionate contributions to future improvement projects. 9) The applicant shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the Elm Creek Watershed, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, and other relevant agencies. 10) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the site plan and other relevant documents. Potential Council Action If the City Council concurs with the findings of the Planning Commission, the following actions would be in order: 1. Move to adopt the ordinance rezoning the subject property to the Business Park zoning district. 2. Move to adopt the resolution authorizing publication of the ordinance by title and summary. 3. Move to adopt the resolution granting Site Plan Review approval for The Wealshire of Medina 4. Move to approve the development agreement by and between the City of Medina and The Wealshire, LLC Attachments 1) DRAFT Ordinance rezoning property 2) Resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 3) DRAFT Resolution grating Site Plan Review approval 4) Development Agreement 5) Excerpt from 3/8/2016 Planning Commission minutes 6) City Engineer Comments dated 4/272016 7) List of Documents submitted 8) Applicant Narrative 9) Plans received by the City 4/15/2016 Wealshire of Medina Page 8 of 8 May 3, 2016 Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Interim Use Permit City Council Meeting CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE THE PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MOHAWK DRIVE AND CHIPPEWA ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The official zoning map of the City of Medina is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the property described in Exhibit A from RR-UR, Rural Residential - Urban Reserve to BP, Business Park. Section 2. The property rezoned is displayed in the map in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Section 3. The City of Medina Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to publish this ordinance and make the appropriate changes to the official zoning map of the City of Medina to reflect the change in zoning classifications as set forth above. Section 4. A copy of this Ordinance and the updated map shall be kept on file at the Medina City Hall. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption and publication. Adopted by the Medina City Council this 3th day of May 2016. CITY OF MEDINA By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Published in the Crow River News on this day the �of , 2016. Ordinance No. ### 1 May 3, 2016 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Being Rezoned That part of the East 740 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying North of the South 684 feet thereof, Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota AND The South 684 feet of the East 740 feet of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal' Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota Ordinance No. ### 2 May 3, 2016 EXHIBIT B Map Displaying Property Being Rezoned — 1 — - LOST HORSE RD 1 CATES RANCH IDR 1 0 Ordinance No. ### May 3, 2016 Location of Property rezoned to Business Park PATRI^IKA RD PAWNEE RCS 1 CHIPPEWA RD I — . MEANDER RD I unra�L 1 3 Member _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance amending the official zoning map to rezone the property at the northwest corner of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is three pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety. Public Notice The city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance amending the official zoning map to rezone the property at the northwest corner of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road. The ordinance rezones the property from Rural -Residential Urban Reserve to Business Park (BP). The full text and map exhibits of Ordinance No. ### are available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 2016-## May 3, 2016 Dated: May 3, 2016 Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-## 2 May 3, 2016 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2015-## RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR WEALSHIRE, LLC TO CONSTRUCT A MEMORY CARE FACILITY NORTHWEST OF MOHAWK DRIVE AND CHIPPEWA ROAD WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Wilfred J. Cavanaugh Family Limited Partnership (the "Owner"), owns property at the northwest corner of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road (the "Property"), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Wealshire, LLC (the "Applicant") desires to purchase the Property and construct an approximately 163,000 square foot building in which to operate a memory care facility; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested approval of a site plan review for construction of the facility; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held the required public hearing and reviewed the request on February 10, 2015 and March 8, 2016 and unanimously recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the request at the May 19, 2015 and April 19, 2016 meetings, considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and heard from interested parties; and WHEREAS, based on the written and oral record before the Planning Commission and City Council on the above dates as well as all additional testimony submitted to the City, the City Council finds that, subject to the conditions noted below, the proposed construction is consistent with relevant City requirements. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby approves the Site Plan Review and Interim Use permit subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) The Applicant shall construct the improvements as displayed on the plans received by the City on 4/15/2016, except as modified herein. Resolution No. 2016-## May 3, 2016 2) This approval shall be valid for one calendar year for Phase I and three calendar years for Phase II. The Applicant may request a permit to construct Phase II within this time frame without obtaining Site Plan Review approval. 3) This approval is contingent upon approval of a wetland replacement plan for wetland impacts. 4) The Applicant shall grant an additional 3 feet of right-of-way to the City as well as easements over all public utility improvements. The applicant shall also grant additional right-of-way if necessary for future bypass/turn-lane improvements at the proposed entrance. 5) The Applicant shall meet the recommendations of the City Engineer dated 4/27/2016. 6) Upland buffers shall be established fully around all wetland areas, including required vegetation, signage and easements. 7) No tree planting has been required for the area south of the wetland. This area shall be landscaped consistent with City requirements upon future development. Landscaping plans shall identify proposed ground cover in this location. 8) In lieu of constructing improvements to Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road to support the proposed development, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City related to proportionate contributions to future improvement projects. 9) The Applicant shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the Elm Creek Watershed, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, and other relevant agencies. 10) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the site plan and other relevant documents. Dated: May 3, 2016. By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-## 2 May 3, 2016 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property That part of the East 740 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying North of the South 684 feet thereof, Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota AND The South 684 feet of the East 740 feet of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota Resolution No. 2016-## 3 May 3, 2016 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MEDINA AND WEALSHIRE, LLC This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 (RHB) 4621061756 ME230-603 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Right to Proceed 1 2. Plans; Improvements 2 3. Erosion Control 2 4. Site Grading; Haul Routes 3 5. Construction of Improvements 3 6. Roadway Improvements 4 7. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements 5 8. Stormwater Improvements 5 9. Landscaping Plan 6 10. Wetlands; Upland Buffer Easement 6 11. Letter of Credit 6 12. Developer's Default 7 13. Insurance 8 14. City Utility Connection Fees; Metropolitan Council SAC Fee 8 15. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection 8 16. No Building Permits Approved 9 17. Clean up and Dust Control 9 18. Compliance with Laws 9 29. Agreement Runs With the Land 9 20. Indemnification 9 21. Assignment 10 22. Notices 10 23. Severability 10 24. Non -waiver 10 25. Counterparts 11 SIGNATURES 12-13 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT B LIST OF PLAN DOCUMENTS EXHIBIT C FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT D FORM OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT E FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT F SITE IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE EXHIBIT G FORM OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT EXHIBIT H FORM OF PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT — MOHAWK DRIVE EXHIBIT I GENERAL DEPICTION OF EASEMENTS i 4621061/56 ME230-603 This Development Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2016, by and between the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the "City"), and Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). WITNES SETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of land located in the northwest quadrant of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road (the "Property"), which land is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City has approved a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning and site plan for the Property (collectively, the "City Approvals"); and WHEREAS, the City Approvals are contingent upon the Developer entering into a development agreement satisfactory to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Right to Proceed. This Agreement is intended to regulate the development of the Property and the construction therein of certain public and private improvements. The Developer may not construct public or private improvements or any buildings on the Property until all the following conditions precedent have been satisfied: a) this Agreement has been executed by the Developer and the City; b) the required Letter of Credit (as hereinafter defined) has been received by the City from or on behalf of the Developer; c) final engineering and construction plans have been submitted by the Developer and approved by the city engineer; d) the Developer has paid the City for all legal, engineering and administrative expenses incurred by the City regarding the City Approvals and has given the City the additional escrow required by Section 15 of this Agreement; e) the Developer and City have executed a petition and waiver agreement regarding the future improvements to Mohawk Drive in the form attached hereto as Exhibits H; f) the Developer has executed the stormwater maintenance agreement, the drainage and utility easement, the upland buffer easement agreement and the right-of-way easement in the general forms attached hereto as Exhibits C, D, E and G and such easements as are generally depicted in Exhibit I attached hereto; g) the Developer has received all required permits from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and all other permitting agencies having jurisdiction; 1 4621061756 ME230-603 h) the Developer or the Developer's engineer has initiated and attended a preconstruction meeting with the City engineer and staff; and i) the City has issued a notice that all conditions precedent have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 2. Plans; Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to develop the Property in accordance with the City Approvals, as detailed in City ordinance No. , and City resolutions Nos. and , which ordinance and resolutions are hereby incorporated into this Agreement, and to construct all improvements on the Property in accordance with the approved final engineering and construction plans dated as of , as revised 2016 (collectively, the "Plans"). The documents which constitute the Plans are those on file with and approved by the City and are listed on Exhibit B attached hereto. The Plans may not be modified by the Developer without the prior written approval of the City. b) In developing the Property in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall make or install at its sole expense the following public and private improvements (collectively, the "Improvements"): 1. site grading in accordance with Paragraph 4; 2. parking lot and fire lane; 3. sanitary sewer and water improvements in accordance with Paragraph 7; 4. water distribution system; 5. stormwater improvements in accordance with Paragraph 8; 6. landscaping in accordance with Paragraph 9; and 7. services. c) All work performed by or on behalf of the Developer related to construction of the Improvements or the building on the Property shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. 3. Erosion Control. a) All construction on the Property shall be conducted in a manner designed to control erosion and in compliance with all City ordinances and other requirements, including the City's permit with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding municipal separate storm sewer system program. Before any other portion of the Property is rough graded, an erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer as approved by the City. The City may impose reasonable, additional erosion control requirements after the City's initial approval, if the City deems necessary due to a change in conditions. All areas disturbed by the excavation shall be reseeded promptly after the completion of the work in that area unless the construction of buildings or other improvements is anticipated immediately thereafter. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. b) If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems reasonably appropriate to control erosion based on the urgency of the situation. The City will 2 4621061756 ME230-603 make a good faith effort to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, including by telephone or email in the case of emergencies, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's obligations or the City's rights hereunder. c) The Developer agrees to reimburse all expenses incurred by the City in connection with such actions. No grading or construction of the Improvements will be allowed and no building permits will be issued for the Property unless the Developer is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. The erosion control measures specified in the Plans or otherwise required on the Property shall be binding on the Developer, its successors and assigns. 4. Site Grading; Haul Routes. a) In order to construct the Improvements and otherwise prepare the Property for development, it will be necessary for the Developer to grade portions of the Property. All site grading must be done in compliance with the Plans. The City may withhold issuance of a building permit for the Property until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City. Within 45 days after completion of the grading, the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan and a certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer. b) The Developer agrees that any fill material which must be brought to or removed from the Property during construction of the Improvements, while grading the site, or during construction of the buildings, will use the haul routes established by the City. For purposes of this provision, the City designates Mohawk Drive to T.H. 55 or Mohawk Drive to Chippewa Road west to Willow Drive to T.H. 55 as haul routes. 5. Construction of Improvements. a) All Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the Plans, the City Approvals, the City's engineering standards (as hereinafter defined) for utility construction and the requirements of the letter from the city engineer dated February 9, 2016. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for utility construction prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Developer shall obtain any necessary permits from the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and all other agencies having jurisdiction over the Property before proceeding with construction. The Developer shall also comply with the requirements of the letter from Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission dated . The City shall inspect all work at the Developer's expense. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. Prior to beginning construction, the Developer or the Developer's engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with all parties concerned, including the City staff and engineers, to review the program for the construction work. b) Within 30 days after the completion of the Improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" plans and three complete sets of paper "as constructed" plans, each prepared in accordance with City standards and in AutoCADD format based on Hennepin County coordinates. Sanitary sewer, water and stormwater "as constructed" plans shall also be submitted to the City in GIS format compatible with Arc Map 10.3 in the coordinates and with the attributes directed by the city engineer. Iron monuments must be installed on the Property in accordance with state law. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a 3 4621061756 ME230-603 written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. All Improvements required by this Agreement shall be completed by no later than c) The Developer agrees to require its contractor to provide to the City a warranty bond for the Improvements described in elements 3, 4, 5 and 6 of paragraph 2(b) of this Agreement, with each bond to cover defects in labor and materials for the applicable Improvements for a period of two years from the date of their acceptance by the City or from their completion if they are not to be dedicated to the City. The bonds shall be in an amount equal to 100 percent of the estimated cost of the Improvements, as specified in Exhibit F attached hereto. During such period, the Developer agrees to repair or replace any Improvement, or portion or element thereof, which shows signs of failure, normal wear and tear excepted. A decision regarding whether an Improvement shows signs of failure shall be made by the City in the reasonable exercise of its judgment following consultation with the Developer. If the defective Improvement is not repaired or replaced by means of the warranty bond or if Developer otherwise fails to repair or replace a defective Improvement during the warranty period after prior written notice to Developer and a 60-day opportunity to cure, the City may repair or replace the defective portion and seek reimbursement from the Developer for such repairs or replacements. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City fully for the reasonable cost of all Improvement repairs or replacement. The City may also use the Letter of Credit if, after notice and reasonable opportunity, the Developer fails to do so. Such reimbursement must be made within 45 days of the date upon which the City notifies the Developer of the cost due under this section. If the Developer fails to make required payments to the City, the Developer hereby consents to the City levying special assessments for any unreimbursed amount associated with such costs against the Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges the benefit to the Property of the repair or replacement of the Improvements and hereby consents to such assessment and waives the right to a hearing or notice of hearing or any appeal thereon under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. 6. Roadway Improvements. a) It may be necessary in the future to construct certain improvements to Mohawk Drive to provide safe and efficient turning movements and through passage, including a northbound bypass lane and a southbound right turn lane into the Property. Instead of the City requiring these improvements immediately, the Developer agrees to construct them in the future at the discretion of the City. The City may, at its sole but reasonable discretion, determine there is a need for these or other improvements any time after issuance of a building permit for Phase I and until 10 years following of the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy for Phase II. Such determination may be made by the City at its reasonable but sole discretion for any reason, including development of Phase II of the project or development of other nearby properties. The Developer agrees to execute a right-of-way easement to the City in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit G to provide the necessary right-of-way for such improvements. Upon determination by the City of the need for such improvements, the City shall notify the Developer or its successors or assigns in writing and the Developer shall construct the improvements at its sole cost and expense. The Developer shall be responsible for constructing the improvements if said notice is issued by the City within 10 years following the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase II. The improvements shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by the Developer and acceptable to the City. The City agrees to grant such rights as may be necessary for the Developer to construct the improvements within the 4 4621061756 ME230-603 public right-of-way. If the Developer fails to construct the improvements after notice by the City and a minimum of 180 days to perform, taking into consideration seasonal and weather conditions and the urgency of addressing public safety concerns, the City shall have the right to construct the improvements and to specially assess the full cost thereof against the Property. In order to ensure that the City has valid and collectible assessments for such project, the Developer agrees to execute a Petition and Waiver Agreement in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit H. b) The Property is located at the intersection of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road. Access from Mohawk Drive to T.H. 55 is limited to right in/right out. The City's comprehensive transportation plan calls for the improvement of Chippewa Road from Mohawk Drive to Arrowhead Drive in order to provide access to the full -movement intersection at Arrowhead Drive and T.H. 55. The necessity of these improvements is predominantly a result ofmcreased by the development of the Property and surrounding lands. The Developer hereby acknowledges that but for the development necessary. The Developer acknowledges that if such improvements are made to Chippewa Road in the future, such improvements would benefit the Property and that the Developer, or its successors and assigns, shall be assessed in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. 7. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements. The Developer agrees to extend sanitary sewer and water lines from the intersection of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road to serve the Property. The Developer's work in extending utilities must be in accordance with the Plans and must comply with all City requirements regarding such utilities. The work will include extending sanitary sewer and water up Mohawk Drive to the northern line of the Property, stub the watermain to the west to permit future looping and install sanitary sewer and water stubs to serve future development on the east side of Mohawk Drive. The Developer shall execute a drainage and utility easement in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit D over the area in which the sanitary sewer and water improvements are to be constructed. 8. Stormwater Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct the on -site stormwater improvements in accordance with the Plans and in compliance with all City requirements regarding such improvements. The stormwater facilities serving the Property will remain private and will be maintained by the Developer at its sole expense. The City does not intend to accept the stormwater facilities as public and does not intend to maintain them. In order to meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, the Developer agrees to enter into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. The purpose of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement is to ensure that the Developer maintains the stormwater facilities and to give the City the right but not the obligation to do so if the Developer fails in its obligations. The Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded against the Property and will run with the land. The Developer acknowledges that i) the on -site storm water improvements have not and will not be accepted by the City; ii) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the storm sewer improvements and that the Developer will have responsibility for such work; iii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the Developer to do so; and iv) if the City performs any work on the storm water improvements, the City intends to specially assess the cost of such work against the Property. 5 4621061756 ME230-603 b) The stormwater improvements to be constructed by the Developer on the Property will be sized and are intended to serve the stormwater needs of Phase I and Phase II of the development but not the southerly portion of the Property. Upon development of the southern portion of the Property, stormwater needs for that area will be re-evaluated and additional ponding and easements may be needed. c) The Developer agrees to execute an easement over all of the stormwater improvements in the general form of the drainage and utility easement attached hereto as Exhibit D. 9. Landscaping Plan. The Developer agrees to install landscaping in accordance with the Plans. All landscaping shall include hardy, non-invasive and drought tolerant species appropriate for Minnesota. All landscaping materials shall be maintained and replaced if they die within two years. Any automatic water irrigation system utilized on the Property shall be equipped with rain sensors or soil moisture sensors and is subject to the City's irrigation ordinance and water conservation ordinance which prohibits the use of treated municipal water in connection with a landscape irrigation system. Notwithstanding the requirement that water for landscaping not be taken from the public water supply, water may be utilized from the public water system for a limited period of time until the landscaping material has been established. If the Developer wishes to obtain site plan approval of Phase II at this time, the landscape plan must be updated to include the Phase II improvements. 10. Wetlands; Upland Buffer Easement. a) The Developer is required to obtain a wetlands replacement permit as required by the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act because of proposed wetland impacts on the Property. The Developer shall not impact the subject wetlands unless and until the required permit has been issued. The Developer shall perform work on the Property in accordance with the terms of said permit. If the permit provides for a wetlands configuration which is not fully subject to the drainage and utility easements granted to the City pursuant to the drainage and utility easement required by this Agreement, the Developer agrees to grant additional or revised easements to the City to encompass all the wetlands. b) The Developer agrees to execute a drainage and utility easement over all of the wetlands in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit D. c) The Developer agrees to execute the Upland Buffer Easement in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit E. The purpose of the Upland Buffer Easement is to ensure that the buffer areas surrounding the wetlands on the Property are planted with appropriate materials intended to enhance water quality in the wetlands and are maintained in that condition thereafter. 11. Letter of Credit. a) In order to ensure completion of the Improvements required under this Agreement and satisfaction of all fees due to the City, including any deferred or contingently waived SAC fees, the Developer agrees to deliver to the City prior to beginning any construction on the Property a letter of credit (the "Letter of Credit") in the amount of $ , which represents 150 percent of the estimated cost of the Improvements. This amount represents the maximum risk exposure for the City, based on the anticipated sequence of construction and the estimated cost of each element of the Improvements, rather than the entire 6 4621061756 ME230-603 cost of all required Improvements. The Letter of Credit shall be delivered to the City prior to issuance of a building permit for the Property and shall renew automatically thereafter until released by the City as set forth in b) below. The itemized costs of the Improvements are estimated on Exhibit F attached hereto. The Letter of Credit shall be issued by a bank reasonably determined by the City to be solvent and creditworthy and shall be in a form acceptable to the City. The Letter of Credit shall allow the City to draw upon the instrument, in whole or part, in order to complete construction of any or all of the Improvements, and to pay any fees or costs due to the City by the Developer. The Letter of Credit may be used to complete any Improvement even if the actual cost of the Improvement exceeds its estimated cost as shown in Exhibit F. The Developer has further indicated that the itemized costs of the Improvements estimated in Exhibit F may reduce. In the event such a reduction occurs, the Developer may request that the City accept a new or modified Letter of Credit in a lower aggregate amount, supported by the new financial information related to the Improvements. The City shall retain sole discretion in determining the appropriate amount of the necessary Letter of Credit, but shall not withhold reasonable modifications to the Letter of Credit upon clear and convincing evidence provided by the Developer that the costs of the Improvements have in fact changed. Such modifications to the Letter of Credit amount shall not be considered reductions under the terms of this Agreement. b) The City agrees to release or reduce the Letter of Credit promptly upon substantial completion of the Improvements on the Property, or any significant portion thereof, and satisfaction of all of the Developer's financial obligations to the City. The first opportunity to reduce the Letter of Credit shall occur after satisfactory completion of the base course of the parking lot and fire lane portions of the Improvements. After satisfactory completion of all elements of the Improvements except the landscaping, the City shall reduce the Letter of Credit to the aggregate amount of any unpaid, deferred or contingent fees payable by the Developer to the City. The Letter of Credit shall be released following expiration of the two-year warranty period for the landscaping and after satisfaction of all other provisions of this Section 11. c) Prior to releasing any portion of the Letter of Credit or accepting another letter of credit in replacement, the City shall first be satisfied regarding the quality and completeness of the construction or work, that the Developer has taken such steps as may be necessary to ensure that no liens will attach to the Property and that the Developer or the Developer's contractor has provided any required warranty bond to the City. d) If at any time the City determines that the bank issuing the Letter of Credit no longer satisfies the City's requirements regarding solvency and creditworthiness, the City shall notify the Developer and the Developer shall provide to the City within 30 days a substitute Letter of Credit from another bank meeting the City's requirements. If the Developer fails to provide the City with a substitute Letter of Credit from an issuing bank satisfactory to the City within 30 days or such shorter period as may be necessary to ensure there remains a valid letter of credit available to the City, the City may draw under the existing Letter of Credit. 12. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to construction or repair of any of the Improvements, the City may after providing Developer with a 30-day notice and opportunity to cure, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City. This Agreement is a license for the City 7 462106v56 ME230-603 to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek an order from any court for permission to enter the Property for such purposes. If the City does any such work, the City shall first seek reimbursement by the Developer and if Developer fails to make such reimbursement within 45 days after notice, then the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy special assessments against the Property to recover the costs thereof. For this purpose, the Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, expressly waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments, including but not limited to, hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the land so assessed. The Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, also waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 429.081. 13. Insurance. The Developer agrees to take out and maintain or require its general contractor to cause to be taken out and maintained until six months after the City has accepted the public elements of the Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its contractors or subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission or for any other claim and $1,000,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The certificate of insurance shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance as is afforded to the policy holder. 14. City Utility Connection Fees; Metropolitan Council SAC Fee. a) In accordance with City policy and to distribute uniformly the costs of public utility infrastructure improvements, the City will charge the Developer trunk connection fees for the availability of sanitary sewer and water to the Property. The total connection fees shall be computed as of the date of issuance of the building permit and shall be payable over a period of five years. Twenty percent of the fee shall be payable prior to issuance of the building permit for each Phase of the project. The remaining fee shall be payable at the rate of 20 percent each year over the following four years. Each annual payment shall be due on or before the anniversary date of the first payment. b) The Metropolitan Council has established the number of sewer availability charge units attributable to the project as 28 units, but the Developer has suggested that actual usage shall be 30 percent lower, based on similar facilities owned by the Developer. The City agrees to collect City fees based on the lower number but retains the right to reevaluate the number of units at any time within two years of the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy for Phase II. If the City reasonably determines that additional units (up to the number determined by the Metropolitan Council) are justified based on actual usage, the Developer agrees to pay such additional fees within 60 days of notice from the City. If the Developer fails to pay the required additional fees, the City shall have the right to specially assess the Property for the unpaid fees and the Developer hereby waives any right to appeal said assessments under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 or Chapter 444. c) In addition to the City fees payable under subparagraphs a) and b) above, the Developer will be responsible for payment of the SAC charges set by the Metropolitan Council and without deferral or waiver of any portion thereof. 8 4621061756 ME230-603 15. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection. a) The Developer agrees to pay to the City an administrative fee in the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its reasonable costs and expenses in reviewing the City Approvals, including the drafting and negotiation of this Agreement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City in full for such reasonable costs within 30 days after notice in writing by the City. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost incurred in the enforcement of any provision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. b) The Developer shall also pay a fee for City construction observation and administration relating to construction of the Improvements. Construction observation shall include inspection of all the public and private Improvements. In order to reimburse the City for the administrative fee and the reasonable cost of inspection of the Improvements, the Developer shall deposit an additional $ into an escrow account with the City, which shall receive and hold such funds solely under the terms of this Agreement. If any funds held under this escrow exceed the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its costs under this subparagraph, such funds shall be promptly returned to Developer without interest. If it appears that the actual costs incurred will exceed the estimate, Developer and City shall review the costs required to complete the project and the Developer shall promptly deposit additional sums with the City. 16. No Building Permits Approved. The City Approvals do not include approval of a building permit for any structures on the Property. The Developer must submit and the City must approve building plans prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Property. The Developer or the party applying for the building permit shall be responsible for payment of the customary fees associated with the building permit. 17. Clean up and Dust Control. The Developer shall daily clean dirt and debris from streets adjoining the Property resulting from construction work by the Developer, its contractors, agents or assigns. Prior to any construction on the Property, the Developer shall identify to the City in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall provide dust control to the satisfaction of the City's engineer throughout construction on the Property. 18. Compliance With Laws. The Developer agrees to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations and directives of the state of Minnesota and the City applicable to the Property. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of Minnesota. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits for the Property. 19. Agreement Runs With the Land. This Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be recorded against the title thereto and shall bind the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 20. Indemnification. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from the City Approvals. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless for all costs, 9 4621061756 ME230-603 damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees, except matters involving acts of gross negligence by the City. 21. Assignment. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the prior written permission of the City. 22. Notices. Any notice or correspondence to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed to be given if delivered personally or sent by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested: a) as to Developer: Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 Attn: Thomas A. Wiskow with a copy to: Debra E. Altschuler Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 ATTN: City Administrator with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this section. The Developer shall promptly notify the City in writing if it changes its name or address. 23. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such section and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision of this Agreement. 24. Non -waiver. Each right, power or remedy conferred upon the City by this Agreement is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, or available to the City at law or in equity, or under any other agreement. Each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. If either 10 4621061756 ME230-603 party waives in writing any default or nonperformance by the other party, such waiver shall be deemed to apply only to such event and shall not waive any other prior or subsequent default. 25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. ******************** 11 4621061756 ME230-603 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MEDINA By Bob Mitchell, Mayor By Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. 12 Notary Public 4621061756 ME230-603 WEALSHIRE, LLC. By Its Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by , the Chief Manager of Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. 13 Notary Public 462106v56 ME230-603 EXHIBIT A TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The land to which this Development Agreement applies is legally described as follows: Parcel 1: That part of the East 740 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying North of the South 684 feet thereof, Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Parcel 2: The South 684 feet of the East 740 feet of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A-1 4621061756 ME230-603 EXHIBIT B TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The following documents prepared by RSP Architects collectively constitute the Plans: [to be included] B-1 462106v56 ME230-603 EXHIBIT C TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of 2016, by and between Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"), and the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer owns certain real property located in the Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Developer has granted to the City a drainage and utility easement over a portion of the Property (the "Easement Area") legally described and depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to construct within the Easement Area certain stormwater improvements (the "Stormwater Improvements") for the benefit of the Property; and WHEREAS, by a separate development agreement of even date herewith, the City and the Developer have entered into an agreement specifying the construction and maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission requires permanent provisions for handling of storm runoff, including terms and conditions for operation and maintenance of all Stormwater Improvements, and requires such provisions to be set forth in an agreement to be recorded against the Property; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer intend to comply with certain conditions, including entering into a maintenance agreement regarding the Stormwater Improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer and its successor or assigns as fee owner of the Property shall be responsible for maintaining the Stormwater Improvements and for observing all drainage laws governing the operation and maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer shall adhere to the schedule for the periodic inspection of the Stormwater Improvements attached hereto as Exhibit C. The Developer shall make all such scheduled inspections, keep record of all inspections and maintenance activities, and submit such records annually to the City. The cost of all inspections and maintenance, including skimming and C-1 4621061756 ME230-603 cleaning of the Stormwater Improvements, shall be the obligation of the Developer and its successors or assigns as the fee owner of the Property. 2. City's Maintenance Rights. The City may maintain the Stormwater Improvements, as provided in this paragraph, if the City reasonably believes that the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to maintain the Stormwater Improvements in accordance with applicable drainage laws and other requirements and such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer written notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to complete said task. The City's notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. If Developer does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Area to perform such maintenance tasks. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer or its successors or assigns, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer or its assigns fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Stormwater Improvements within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successor and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Stormwater Improvements benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency, as determined by the city engineer, the 30-day notice requirement to the Developer for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety by the Developer, and the Developer shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given. 3. Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or resulting from the Developer's, or the Developer's agents' or employees' negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions, but this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. In the event the City, upon the failure of the Developer to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the performance of the Developer's required work under this Agreement, but this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. 4. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. C-2 4621061756 ME230-603 5. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered, be sent by nationally recognized overnight courier or be sent by U.S. certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: a) as to the Developer: b) as to the City: Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 Attn: Thomas A. Wiskow City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attn: City Administrator or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 6. Successors. All duties and obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Developer's successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property. 7. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first written above. ******************** C-3 4621061756 ME230-603 WEALSHIRE, LLC. By: Its Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by , the Chief Manager of Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. C-4 Notary Public 4621061756 ME230-603 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Ss. CITY OF MEDINA By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor And by: Scott T. Johnson City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and the city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 C-5 Notary Public 4621061756 ME230-603 EXHIBIT A TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property Parcel 1: That part of the East 740 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying North of the South 684 feet thereof, Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Parcel 2: The South 684 feet of the East 740 feet of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. C-A-1 4621061756 ME230-603 EXHIBIT B TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of Drainage and Utility Easement [to be included] C-B-1 4621061756 ME230-603 EXHIBIT C TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Inspection and Maintenance Schedule Stormwater Ponds: Inspection and maintenance shall be made consistent with the most recent version of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual or other subsequent manual as dictated by the City. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the schedule can be found in Table 12.POND.4 of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual as follows: Table 12.POND.4. Typical Inspection/Maintenance Frequencies for Ponds Inspection Items _Maintenance Items Frequency Ensure that at least 50 % of wetland plants survive Check for invasive wetland plants. Replant wetland vegetation One time -After First Year Check that maintenance access is free and clear Inspect low flow orifices, reverse flow pipes, and other pipes for clogging Check the permanent pool or dry pond area for floating debris, undesirable vegetation. Investigate the shoreline for erosion Monitor wetland plant composition and health. Look for broken signs, locks, and other dangerous items. Mowing — minimum Spring and Fall Remove debris Repair undercut, eroded, and bare soil areas. Monthly to Quarterly or After Major Storrs (>1') Monitor wetiand plant composition and health. Identify invasive plants Ensure mechanical components are functional Trash and debris clean-up day Remove invasive plants Harvest wetland plants Replant wetland vegetation Repair broken mechanical components if needed Semi-annual to annual Ail routine inspection items above Inspect user, barrel, and embankment for damage Inspect all pipes Monitor sediment deposition in pond and forebay pipe and Riser Repair Forebay maintenance and sediment removal when needed Every 1 to 3 years Monitor sediment deposition in pond and forebay Forebay maintenance and sediment removal when needed 2 7 years Remote television inspection of reverse slope pipes, under -drains, and other hard to access piping Sediment removal from main pond/ wetland pipe replacement if needed 5-25 years Stormwater Pond Sand Filters: Inspection and maintenance shall be made consistent with the most recent version of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual or other subsequent manual as dictated by the City. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the schedule can be found in Table 12.FIL.4 of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual as follows: C-C-1 462106v56 ME230-603 Table 12.FIL.4. Recommended Maintenance Activities Tor Media Filters (Sources. 1997; Pitt, 1997) WMI, Activity Schedule • If filler bed is clogged or partially clogged, manual manipulation of the surface layer of sand may be required_ Remove the top few inches of media, roto-till or otherwise cultivate the surface, and replace media with like material meeting the design specifications_ • Replace any filter fabric that has become dogged. As needed • Ensure that contnbuting area,. facility, inlets and outlets are clear of debns_ • Ensure that the contributing area is stabilized and mowed, with clippings removed • Remove trash and debris_ • Check to ensure that the filter surface is not clogging (also check after storms greater than about 1")_ • Ensure that activities in the drainage area minimize oil/grease and sediment entry to the system. • If permanent water level is present in pre-treatment chamber (e.g., perimeter rseafnndfielltter), ensure that. the chamber does not leak, and normal pool level is Monthly • Check�to see that the filter bed is clean of sediment and the sediment chamber is not more than fi inches of sediment_ Remove sediment as necessary. • Make sure that there is no evidence of deterioration, spatting or cracking of concrete. • Inspect grates (perimeter sand filter}_ • Inspect inlets, outlets and overflow spillway to ensure good condition and no evidence of erosion. • Repair or replace any damaged structural parts. • Stabilize any eroded areas. • Ensure Mat flow is not bypassing the facility. • Ensure that no noticeable odors are detected outside the facility Annually • Remove and replace the top 25 inches of media every 3 to 5 years for low sediment applications, more often for areas of high sediment yield or high oil and grease. 3 to 5 years In addition to the above, ponds shall be inspected annually to determine if draw down occurs within 48 hours, and corrections made if the time exceeds 48 hours. C-C-2 4621061756 ME230-603 EXHIBIT D TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is made by Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Grantor, in favor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Grantee. Recitals A. Grantor is the fee owner of the property located in Hennepin County Minnesota (the "Property") and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto. B. Grantor desires to grant to the Grantee an easement, according to the terms and conditions contained herein. Terms of Easement 1. Grant of Easement. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor, Grantor grants and conveys to the Grantee a perpetual, non-exclusive drainage and utility easement over, under, and across the portion of the Property described and depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto. 2. Scope of Easement. The perpetual, non-exclusive drainage and utility easement granted herein includes the right of the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and employees to enter the premises upon reasonable notice (except in the event of an emergency) for the purpose of locating, constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, inspecting, altering and repairing the utilities, drainage ways and stormwater facilities in the described easement area. 3. Warranty of Title. The Grantor warrants it is the fee owner of the Property and has the right, title and capacity to convey to the Grantee the easement herein. 4. Environmental Matters. The Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees, or losses resulting from any claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon a release or threat of release of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which may have existed on, or which relate to, the easement area or Property prior to the date of this instrument. 5. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns. Dated this day of , 2016. D-1 4621061756 ME230-603 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. WEALSHIRE, LLC By Its Chief Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016 by , the Chief Manager of Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company, Grantor. NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered (RHB) 470 US Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Notary Public D-2 4621061756 ME230-603 EXHIBIT A TO DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT Legal Description of Property Parcel 1: That part of the East 740 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying North of the South 684 feet thereof, Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Parcel 2: The South 684 feet of the East 740 feet of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 4621061756 ME230-603 D-A-1 EXHIBIT B TO DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION OF EASEMENT [to be included] 4621061756 ME230-603 D-B-1 EXHIBIT E TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made this day of , 2016 by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Grantor"). RECITALS A. Grantor is the fee owner of property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and B. Grantor and the City have entered into a separate development agreement (the "Development Agreement") regarding the development of the Property. C. The City has granted approval of a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning and site plan concerning the Property (the "City Approvals"), under the terms of which the Grantor is required to establish upland buffers adjacent to wetlands on portions of the Property consistent with City regulations, the location of which is legally described in Exhibit B, attached hereto (the "Easement Area"). D. In accordance with the Development Agreement, the City Approvals and the City's wetland preservation ordinance, the City has requested that Grantor grant to the City a conservation easement (the "Upland Buffer Easement") over the Easement Area. The Easement Area is depicted on Exhibit C attached hereto. E. Grantor is willing to grant the Upland Buffer Easement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. PROVISIONS In consideration of the mutual promises of the parties contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, an Upland Buffer Easement in, under, on, over and across the Easement Area, and the City hereby accepts such grant. The duration of this easement is perpetual, subject to Minnesota law governing granting of easements to governmental bodies, and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. 4621061756 ME230-603 E-1 2. The following terms and conditions shall apply to the Easement Area: a. The Easement Area shall be preserved predominantly in its natural condition, except to the extent set forth below. No use shall be made of the Easement Area except uses, if any, which would not change or alter the condition of the Easement Area or its drainage, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, or fish and wildlife habitat and characteristics. b. No structures, hardcover or other improvements shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, above or beneath the Easement Area, with the exception of a boardwalk or dock not to exceed four feet in width to allow reasonable access to the wetland. c. No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Easement Area except as is necessary to remove storm damage, diseased or non-native vegetation or as authorized by the prior written consent of the City consistent with the wetland preservation ordinance. A path no more than four feet in width may be mowed to allow reasonable access to the wetland. d. No earth, peat, gravel or soil, sand or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Easement Area and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. e. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area, and no waste, trash, yard waste, manure or other materials shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. 3. Grantor represents that Grantor owns the Easement Area in fee simple, subject only to the encumbrances of record. 4. The Grantor conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, the following rights: a. The City may enter upon the Easement Area for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Easement Area without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Easement Area. The City shall be solely responsible for any damage or loss, including personal injury occasioned by such entry and shall hold Grantor harmless from and against any and all loss, costs, damage and expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs that the Grantor incurs due to the City or its agents entry upon the Property pursuant to this Agreement. The City shall provide notice and an order for corrective action consistent with City regulations. If the Grantor does not take the required corrective action, the City may enter the Property in order to perform the action. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Grantor, which shall include all 4621061756 ME230-603 E-2 reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Grantor fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses within 45 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Grantor, on behalf of itself and its successor and assigns, acknowledges that the corrective work performed by the City benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. b. The City may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction against the Grantor to enforce the terms of this Agreement; to require restoration of the Easement Area to its prior or more natural condition; to enjoin such non-compliance by temporary or permanent injunction and to recover any damages arising from such non-compliance. If a court determines that the Grantor has failed to comply with this Agreement, Grantor or Grantor's successors or assigns shall reimburse the City for any reasonable costs of enforcement, including costs of restoration, court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees, in addition to any other payments ordered by the court. 5. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Easement Area. 6. Grantor retains all responsibilities and shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related to ownership, operation and maintenance of the Property and the Easement Area, except as otherwise expressly provided herein. 7. Grantor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officials, employees and agents, against any and all loss, costs, damage and expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs that the City incurs because of the breach of any of the above covenants and/or resulting from or due to Grantor's intentional misrepresentation of any material fact contained therein. The Grantor and the City agree that each shall be responsible for their own acts and the results of such acts and shall not be responsible for the act of the other party and the results of such acts, except as otherwise expressly provided herein. 8. This Agreement may be amended only by mutual written agreement of the parties. 9. Nothing herein shall give the general public a right of access to the Property. 10. Grantor's rights and obligations under this Agreement terminate upon transfer or termination of its interest in the Property, provided that any liability for acts or omissions occurring prior to the transfer or termination shall survive that transfer or termination. Nothing in this Paragraph 10 is deemed to alter or amend the remaining terms of the Agreement in the event of a transfer of interest. 11. Any notice required in this Agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested: 462106v56 ME230-603 E-3 a) as to Developer: b) as to City: With a copy to: Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 Attn: Thomas A. Wiskow City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attn: City Administrator Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. ************************ 4621061756 ME230-603 E-4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Upland Buffer Easement Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) WEALSHIRE, LLC Its Chief Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by , the Chief Manager of Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public 4621061756 ME230-603 E-5 By: By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF MEDINA Bob Mitchell, Mayor Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. This document drafted by: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Notary Public 4621061756 ME230-603 E-6 EXHIBIT A TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property Parcel 1: That part of the East 740 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying North of the South 684 feet thereof, Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Parcel 2: The South 684 feet of the East 740 feet of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 4621061756 ME230-603 E-A-1 EXHIBIT B TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Easement Area [to be included] 462106v56 ME230-603 E-B-1 EXHIBIT C TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Depiction of the Easement Area [to be included] 462106v56 ME230-603 E-C-1 EXHIBIT F TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Site Improvement Cost Estimate [to be completed] 4621061756 ME230-603 F-1 EXHIBIT G TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is made by Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Grantor, in favor of the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, Grantee. Recitals A. Grantor is the fee owner of certain real property located in the city of Medina (the "Property"), which is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto. B. Grantor desires to grant to the Grantee a right-of-way easement, according to the terms and conditions contained herein. Terms of Easement 1. Grant of Easement. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor, Grantor grants and conveys to the Grantee a permanent, non-exclusive right-of-way easement over, under, across and through the portion of the Property described on Exhibit B attached hereto and depicted on Exhibit C attached hereto. 2. Scope of Easement. The permanent, non-exclusive right-of-way easement granted herein includes the right of the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and employees to enter the premises at all reasonable times for the purpose of locating, constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, inspecting, altering and repairing within the described easement area a public roadway, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water facilities, ground surface drainage ways and sidewalk and trail, or other public facilities or improvements of any type that are not inconsistent with use as a public right-of-way. The easement granted herein also includes the right to cut, trim, or remove from the easement area trees, shrubs, or other vegetation as in the Grantee's judgment unreasonably interfere with the easement or facilities of the Grantee, its successors or assigns. 3. Warranty of Title. The Grantor warrants it is the fee owner of the Property and has the right, title and capacity to convey to the Grantee the easement herein. 4. Environmental Matters. The Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees, or losses resulting from any claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon a release or threat of release of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which may have existed on, or which relate to, the easement area or Property prior to the date of this instrument. 4621061756 ME230-603 G-1 5. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land and be binding on the Grantor, her heirs and assigns. STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: NONE Dated this day of , 2016. WEAL SHIRE, LLC By: Its Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by , the Chief Manager of Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company, Grantor. Notary Stamp THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 (rhb) Notary Public 4621061756 ME230-603 G-2 EXHIBIT A TO RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Parcel 1: That part of the East 740 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying North of the South 684 feet thereof, Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Parcel 2: The South 684 feet of the East 740 feet of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 4621061756 ME230-603 G-A-1 EXHIBIT B TO RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT The legal description of the right-of-way easement is as follows: [to be included] 462106v56 ME230-603 G-B-1 EXHIBIT H TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT - MOHAWK DRIVE THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of , 2016, by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain real property located in Medina and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto, (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is located generally in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road; and WHEREAS, the City has approved a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning and site plan (collectively, the "City Approvals") to allow the development of the Property for a dementia and Alzheimer's care facility; and WHEREAS, current traffic levels on Mohawk Drive are not likely to pose any safety concerns in affording access to or from the Property but the increased traffic associated with additional development of the Property or other properties in the future may raise such concerns; and WHEREAS, the City may find it necessary in the future for the Developer to construct improvements to Mohawk Drive, including a northbound bypass lane and southbound right turn lane (the "Improvement Project") in response to such increased traffic; and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the parties to avoid requiring the Developer to bear the expense of constructing the Improvement Project prematurely while offering the City sufficient assurances that the Developer will pay for all of the cost of such improvements if needed in the future; and WHEREAS, by separate development agreement (the "Development Agreement"), the City and the Developer have agreed that the Developer will construct the Improvement Project in the future if required by the City at its sole discretion; and WHEREAS, if the Developer fails to do so after notice by the City or requests the City do so, the City is willing to construct the Improvement Project without notices or hearings, provided the assurances and covenants hereinafter stated are made by the Developer to ensure that the City will have a valid and collectable special assessment as it relates to the Property to finance the cost of the Improvement Project; and 4621061756 ME230-603 H-1 WHEREAS, were it not for the assurances and covenants hereinafter provided, the City would not construct the Improvement Project without such notices and hearings and would be doing so solely at the behest, and for the benefit, of the Developer; and WHEREAS, the parties have entered into this Agreement pursuant to and in satisfaction of the terms of the City Approvals previously granted by the City and of the Development Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, ON THE BASIS OF THE COVENANTS AND OBLIGATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Developer represents and warrants it is the fee owner of the Property, that it has full legal power and authority to encumber the Property as herein provided, that in doing so it is not in violation of the terms or conditions of any instrument or agreement of any nature to which it is bound or which relates in any manner to the Property and that there are no other liens or encumbrances against the Property except those of record. 2. Unless the Developer constructs the Improvement Project itself, the Developer hereby petitions the City for construction of the Improvement Project at such time as the City, in its sole discretion, deems necessary. The Improvement Project shall consist generally of a northbound bypass lane and southbound right turn lane at the access point to the Property on Mohawk Drive, all as more specifically determined by the City. The City may determine that the Improvement Project is necessary due to increased traffic on Mohawk Drive related to additional development on the Property or of other properties in the vicinity. Such determination may be made at any time after issuance of a building permit for Phase I and until 10 years following the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy for Phase II of the development. The City shall notify the Developer or its successors or assigns in writing if it determines the Improvement Project is needed. The Developer shall be responsible for constructing or paying for the Improvement Project if said notice is issued by the City within 10 years following the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase II of the development. This provision does not preclude the Developer from independently petitioning the City for construction of the Improvement Project at any time Developer believes traffic demand in the vicinity makes such Improvement Project necessary or desirable. 3. The Developer consents to the City levying a special assessment for the Improvement Project against the Property in accordance with Minn. Stat., Section 429.061. The principal amount of the special assessment shall not exceed the lesser of the actual cost of the Improvement Project or $130,000, indexed for increases in construction costs from April 2015, according to the ENR Construction Cost Index for Minneapolis, Minnesota, to the month and year of the start of construction of the Improvement Project. The ENR Construction Cost Index for April 2015 is 11,749. 4. The Developer waives notice of hearing and hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 429.031, on the Improvement Project and notice of hearing and hearing on the special 4621061756 ME230-603 H-2 assessment levied to finance the Improvement Project pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 429.061 and specifically requests that the Improvement Project be constructed and the special assessment be levied against the Property without notice of hearing or hearing. 5. The Developer waives the right to appeal the levy of special assessment in accordance with this Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 429.081 and further specifically agrees with respect to such special assessment against the Property that: a. All requirements of Minn. Stat., Chapter 429 with which the City does not comply are hereby waived by the Developer; and b. The increase in fair market value of the Property resulting from construction of the Improvement Project will be at least equal to the amount of the special assessment levied against the Property and that such increase in fair market value is a special benefit to the Property. 6. The special assessment levied against the Property shall be payable over such period as the City may determine, but not less than 10 years, and shall bear interest at a rate determined by the City, but not more than 2 percent above the City's cost of financing. The City's cost of financing shall mean the average coupon rate if the City sells debt to finance the Improvement Project. If no debt is sold for the Improvement Project, the rate shall be set using the same formula based on special assessment bonds of Minnesota municipalities which have the same credit rating as that of the City and are issued and sold at approximately the same time as the adoption of the resolution levying the special assessment. The first installment of principal and interest shall be included in the first tax rolls completed after adoption of the resolution levying the special assessment. 7. The covenants, waivers and agreements contained in this Agreement shall bind the Developer and its successors and assigns and shall run with the Property. It is the intent of the parties hereto that this Agreement be in a form which is recordable among the land records of Hennepin County, Minnesota and the Developer and the City agree to make any changes in this Agreement which may be necessary to effect the recording and filing of this Agreement against the title of the Property. 8. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed given if delivered personally or sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified and return receipt requested: a) as to the Developer Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 Attn: Thomas A. Wiskow b) as to the City City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attn: City Administrator 4621061756 ME230-603 H-3 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 9. This Agreement shall terminate a) 10 years from the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase II of the project if the City has not made a written determination and sent notice to the Developer to complete the Improvements Project or b) upon the final payment of all special assessment levied against the Property for the Improvement Project if such special assessment is levied, whichever occurs later. The City agrees to execute and deliver such documents, in recordable form, as are necessary to extinguish its rights hereunder upon receipt of such final payment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands the day and year first written above. WEALSHIRE, LLC By: It: Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by , the Chief Manager of Wealshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public 4621061756 ME230-603 H-4 CITY OF MEDINA By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor By: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public 462106v56 ME230-603 H-5 EXHIBIT A TO PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT — MOHAWK DRIVE Legal Description The legal description of the Property is as follows: Parcel 1: That part of the East 740 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying North of the South 684 feet thereof, Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Parcel 2: The South 684 feet of the East 740 feet of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 4621061756 ME230-603 H-A-1 EXHIBIT I TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT GENERAL DEPICTION OF EASEMENTS [INSERT DEPICTION] I-A-1 4621061756 ME230-603 Document comparison by Workshare Compare on Thursday, April 28, 2016 2:32:27 PM Input: Document 1 ID Powerpocs://DOCSOPEN/462106/5 Description DOCSOPEN-#462106-v5-Development_Agt;_ME230-603 Document 2 ID Powerpocs://DOCSOPEN/462106/6 Description DOCSOPEN-#462106-v6-Development_Agt;_ME230-603 Rendering set Standard Legend: Insertion Deletion Moved from Moved to Style change Format change ivlo‘ ea deletion Inserted cell Deleted cell Moved cell Split/Merged cell Padding cell Statistics: Count Insertions 26 Deletions 27 Moved from 0 Moved to 0 Style change 0 Format changed 0 Total changes 53 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from March 8, 2016 Meeting Minutes Wealshire of Medina — Site Plan Review for Construction of 150 Resident Memory Care Facility — NW Mohawk Drive and Chippewa Road V. Reid stated that this is the third time this application has come before the Commission and asked if the Commission should review this as a new application or whether the background information should be considered. Finke suggested the latter option, as the Commission has already approved and commented on the plans. He noted that since the last reviews some of the items have been amended and some of the conditions have been met. He highlighted the two largest changes noting that there were 20 to 26 underground parking spaces proposed in the first two reviews and advised that the applicant is no longer seeking the underground parking for cost reasons and will instead provide additional at grade parking for the site. He stated that the applicant is also proposing to create the fire lane in gravel rather than bituminous, for cost saving purposes. He noted that there is nothing in the building code, which requires the fire lane to be composed of gravel. R. Reid asked and received confirmation that the fire lane would be required to be plowed in the winter months. Foote stated that the impervious surface is well below the maximum and asked if that increased with the creation of the additional at grade parking spaces. He asked if additional parking would be created along with future phases. Finke stated that the impervious surface did increase with the parking area. He identified a future parking area and noted that the facility would be slightly over parked in the first phase. Foote asked if the gravel fire lane would remain gravel or whether that would be paved in future phases. Finke stated that staff is not recommending a condition to that nature but noted that the applicant may choose to do that in future phases if funding allows. Murrin asked if the extended parking caused the decrease in agricultural land that would be available for farming. Finke replied that the reduction in farmable land is a result of the wetland mitigation required. V. Reid asked if the parking setback specified would apply to the eastern portion of the site. Finke stated that the width of the right-of-way width be accounted within that setback. V. Reid stated that perhaps additional landscaping would be desired between the site and the adjacent low -density residential area. She identified an item on the plan and asked if it was a berm. Finke replied that the item is actually a ditch. Corey Wiskow, representing the Wealshire of Bloomington, stated that he was present to answer any questions. He noted that questions regarding the landscaping would most likely be better answered by the Civil Engineer for the project, Rob Olson. He noted that there is a landscaping berm in another area of the project. V. Reid stated that she would like to see additional landscaping on the eastern border of the property. Finke noted that there are boulevard trees included in the landscaping plan that would go between the parking area and right-of-way. He stated that the Commission could make an additional condition if desired. Wiskow stated that if the Commission desires shrubs, they can easily be installed, noting that it is in their best interest as the applicant to make the site pleasant and attractive. He stated that when they 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from March 8, 2016 Meeting Minutes developed the plans their wish list included underground parking but noted that as the bids come in the cost is too high to proceed with that element. He noted that the cost for 22 underground parking stalls would have been between $800,000 and $950,000. He stated that the cost would never be recaptured and therefore a value decision had to be made and that is why the decision was made to place additional parking on the east side of the site. Barry asked if the loading dock would be a smaller space now that the underground parking will be eliminated. Wiskow explained that when the underground parking was removed they also needed to change the way trucks would deliver materials. He stated that the garage door would be removed and replaced with a double door for loading. He stated that in regard to the gravel fire lane, there would most likely only be a gator style ATV traveling the fire lane for maintenance and the only time a full vehicle would travel the fire lane would be if a fire vehicle used that access. Finke stated that if dust is a concern a condition could be added regarding dust control. Wiskow agreed that the dust would create a condition for them as well and feel that there would be no traction that would create dust on that fire lane. Councilmember Peterson asked if the gravel fire lane would be a nine -ton capacity roadway to support fire vehicles. Finke confirmed that the fire lane would be constructed to the required capacity. Councilmember Peterson noted that the road does not have a bypass at this time. He stated that he does support the request for additional landscaping. Finke replied that while the turn lane improvements are not required at this time there is a petition and waiver agreement for the future construction of that element if deemed necessary in the next decade. Wiskow stated that in regard to the farm land there would just not be enough usable space with the additional wetland mitigation efforts. Murrin stated that she is in favor of the project as proposed, as the saved expense from the underground parking could be better invested into the site. She stated that she did not have concern with the gravel fire lane as the applicant would also have incentive to control the dust. R. Reid stated that she is in favor of the project and believed that senior aged living would be a great asset to Medina. White agreed that she also supports the project, noting that she would like to see a more detailed landscaping plan to occur with phase one. Finke stated that there is a condition included that addresses the need for a fully developed landscaping plan and noted that he can adjust the condition to require more robust landscaping along the eastern side of the property with the first phase. Barry stated that he allow supports the project and believed that it would be a great addition to the community He also supported the request for a more robust landscaping plan available for the City Council review. Foote echoed the comments thus far and also supported a more robust landscaping plan. Motion by Murrin, seconded by Foote, to recommend approval of the Wealshire of Medina Site Plan review for the construction of a 150 resident memory care facility subject to the conditions recommended in the staff report and with increased shrubbery on the eastern side of the parking lot. Motion approved unanimously. (Absent: Albers) 2 WSB Y � SB —® Building a legacy —your legacy.® April 26, 2016 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: City Project: Wealshire Development — Updated Site Plan Review WSB Project No. 02712-310 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the updated site plan received on April 18, 2016 for the Wealshire of Medina development. The plans propose to construct improvements to serve a 150 resident dementia and Alzheimer's care facility located on the west side of Mohawk Drive north of Chippewa Road. Documents provided for review include civil site and grading plans dated April 15, 2016 and stormwater management plan dated April 15, 2016. The plans were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. 1. For all locations where sewer crosses the watermain, provide a note to "Maintain 18" Separation". With the recent updates to the sanitary sewer stubs, there are a number of locations where this note is missing. 2. The plans show the locations and details for a wet well and valve vault to drain the proposed loading dock areas. There is a fair amount of grade directed to the loading dock from the immediate area and there is a concern that during high intensity storms, there will be a lot of drainage directed there. The proximity of the CB within the loading dock is close to the proposed doorway and the applicant may want to consider relocating the CB further away from the doorway to minimize potential inundation during rain events. Please provide a description as to the capacity of the stormwater pumping system, the redundancy provided in the design, provisions for winter (freezing) conditions, considerations for power outages, and maintenance plans. 3. Verify that a future south -bound right turn lane would not affect the proposed ponding/ditch area to the north of the driveway location. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jim Stremel. P.E. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02712-310\Admin\Docs\2016-04-15 Submittal `,2016-04-22 Wealshire Site Plan Review.docx Project: LR-15-150 — Wealshire Site Plan Review (& Rezoning, Interim Use Permit) The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 1/9/2015 1/9/2015 3 Application.pdf Y Fee 1/9/2015 1/9/2015 1 Fee.pdf Y $3000; Still have $2000 from CPA Mailing Labels 1/23/2015 1/22/2015 4 Mailing Labels Y Narrative 1/9/2015 1/9/2015 3 Narrative.pdf Y Plan Set 1/9/2015 1/9/2015 17 Plans.pdf Y 14 Civil; 3 Architectural Stormwater Calculations 1/9/2015 1/8/2015 69 Stormwater.pdf Y Geotechnical Report 1/9/2015 11/10/2014 50 Geotechnical.pdf Y Updated Plan Set 1/30/2015 1/29/2015 19 Plans Y Civil updated; 1/9 arch plans added Response Memo 1/29/2015 1/29/2015 5 Response Memo N Updated Site Plan 8/11/2015 8/8/2015 1 N Site Plan Only Updated Plan Set 11/18/2015 10/30/2015 17 Y Civil Only Updated Plan Set 03/22/2016 03/22/2016 19 Updated Plan Set 04/15/2016 04/15/2016 174 Y 21 civil, 57 arch, 33 ele, 41 mech, 22 str Project Manual 04/15/2016 04/15/2016 1118 Y Stormwater Calcs-updated 11/24/2015 11/20/2015 84 Y Updated Plans 1/19/2016 1/15/2016 99 Y 78 arch and 21 eng Stormwater Calcs-updated 1/19/2016 1/18/2016 91 Y Updated Site Plan 3/3/2016 3/3/2016 1 N Site Plan Only Updated Site Plan 3/7/2016 3/7/2016 1 N Site Plan Only Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Legal Comments 1/15/2015 1 Legal-01-15-2015 Police Comments 1/16/2015 1 Police-01-15-2015 Fire Marshal Comments 1/13/2015 1 MW-01-13-2015 Fire Marshal Comments 12/4/2015 1 Engineer and Stormwater Comments 1/19/2015 4 Engineer-01-19-2015 Engineer and Stormwater Comments 2/4/2015 4 Engineer-02-04-2015 Engineer and Stormwater Comments 12/4/2015 3 Engineer-12-4-2015 Engineer and Stormwater Comments 2/9/2016 3 Engineer-2-9-2016 Engineering Comments 4/26/2016 1 Engineer-4-26-2016 Elm Creek Waershed 12/9/2015 2 Elm Creek-12-9-2015 Staff Comments -Incomplete 1/21/2015 2 Incomplete-Comments-01-21-2015 Review Extension 1/26/2015 1 Extension Letter Planning Commission Report 2/4/2015 17 17 pages w/ attach (no plans) City Council Report 5/19/2015 8 37 pages w/ attachments Planning Commission Report 9/2/2015 3 28 pages w/ attachments City Council Report 9/10/2015 3 25 pages w/attachments Planning Commission Report 3/4/2016 8 Plus 23 pages of attachments Public Comments Document Date # of pages Electronic Excerpt from Planning Commission minutes 2/10/2015 2 Except from Planning Commission minutes 9/8/2015 Excerpt from Planning Commission minutes 3/8/2016 ECIEOVE JAN - 9 2015 January 9, 2015 (Initial Letter of October 15, 2014 has been revised) TO: Medina Planning & Zoning Department SUBJ: Amend future land use from low density residential to General Business Property Identification Number: 03-118-23-24-0003 I am the President/CEO and founder of the Wealshire, LLC. Under my supervision, we specialize in the construction and management of assisted living and dementia/Alzheimer's care facilities for seniors. We built and opened the Wellstead of Rogers in 1999, which is a beautiful 162 resident dementia and Alzheimer's care facility that also included 66 deluxe 1 and 2 bedroom apartments for senior general assisted living and a spectacular 300 person banquet/conference center in Rogers, Minnesota. At 162 dementia beds, the Wellstead of Rogers was recognized as the largest senior dementia care facility in the country. Of greater importance, In 2004/05 the Wellstead of Rogers earned the prestigious award for being the best dementia/Alzheimer's care facility in the State of Minnesota, and within a year was named the best senior dementia care facility in the United States. The Wellstead of Rogers is a beautiful senior care campus which won numerous annual awards for stone and brick construction in Minnesota. The exterior of the Wellstead of Rogers looks like a fine manicured country club, with hundreds of trees, resident walking paths, a large gazebo and two water ponds with fountains. The Wellstead of Rogers employed more than 300 well paid nursing, dietary and administrative type employees. Against my wishes, the Wellstead of Rogers was sold in February of 2008 to a large senior healthcare developer from Newton, MA. Upon the sale of the Wellstead of Rogers, I immediately initiated research to purchase land to build another spectacular senior dementia/Alzheimer's care facility in the Twin Cities, and in 2010 we broke ground on the Wealshire of Bloomington, a beautiful 137 resident dementia/Alzheimer's senior care facility in Bloomington, MN. The Wealshire of Bloomington was built in two phases, and the first phase opened in August of 2011, which consisted of 56 senior dementia/Alzheimer's beds. Because of our excellent reputation, this first phase of construction reached full resident occupancy in less than seven (7) months. The second phase of construction, 81 resident beds, opened in September of 2013 and we expect to reach full resident occupancy (137 resident beds) within the next ninety (90) days. The Wealshire of Bloomington is rapidly becoming the "Gold Standard" for senior dementia/Alzheimer's care in the State of Minnesota. The Wealshire more than replicates the beauty and attractiveness of the Wellstead of Rogers. As you may have heard, the City of Bloomington is a very strict and demanding community to build within, but they are extremely fair and reasonable. The Mayor of Bloomington, and the other Principals of the City of Bloomington have indicated that our construction exceeded their greatest expectations. We recommend and encourage you to contact both the City of Bloomington and the City of Rogers to ascertain and confirm our high standards of construction excellence, in addition to our desire to make our senior health care facilities look like prestigious golf country clubs. Our neighbors in Bloomington are extremely pleased and very satisfied with our quality of construction and the beauty we have brought to the neighborhood by building the Wealshire of Bloomington. The Wealshire of Bloomington will employ more than 250 well paid employees at full capacity. As President, CEO and founder of both the Wellstead of Rogers and the Wealshire of Bloomington, I have more than 46 years of successful employment in the medical field. I initially worked for Baxter Healthcare for 6 years in sales and sales management. Then I was President and CEO of Northern Medical/Orthomet for approximately 22 years, and we designed, manufactured and sold orthopedic implant products (total knees & total hips) throughout the USA, Europe, Asia and South America. Upon the death of my father from Alzheimer's in November of 1996, I have spent the last 18 years dedicating my life to improving the "Quality of Life" of individuals suffering some form of dementia. My father and I were very close and he was possibly my best friend. Unfortunately, when my father was 78, he was diagnosed with Alzheimer's and he suffered from this devastating progressive disease for approximately seven years. Unfortunately my father was never given the opportunity to live with pride and dignity during his battles with Alzheimer's, which created extreme guilt on my part when my father finally passed away. While in the casket, I took my father's hand and promised him I would do something so others with this devastating disease could live with pride and dignity. I spent the next 2 years researching approximately 35 Alzheimer's care facilities throughout the USA, and then I put together a business plan to build the Wellstead of Rogers. When we opened the Wellstead of Rogers on August 15, 1999, my mother was our first resident, and she resided at the Wellstead until her death on August 22, 2001. I am sure my commitment and dedication to improving the life of individuals with dementia/Alzheimer's is pleasing to my parents, and the passion I share is evident in the quality of care we provide our demented residents at the care facilities we build. It has been said that each community has an obligation to provide quality senior care to the residents that reside within their community. To this extent, we desire to build the Wealshire of Medina, which would be a 150 resident dementia/Alzheimer's care facility, constructed in two phases. This facility would be relatively similar to the facilities we have built in both Rogers and Bloomington. Our objective is to commence construction in May of 2015, with a projected facility opening date of June 1, 2016. At the request of the Principals of the City of Medina, we would possibly consider constructing a reasonable number of general assisted living apartments for seniors, but this construction is not included in our current developmental plans. We would include 150-200 beautiful trees on this proposed site, with resident walking paths, water ponds with fountains, and underground parking for our projected 250-300 employees. Our initial objective for our proposed dementia and Alzheimer's facility development in Medina consisted of our desire to purchase 11.0 acres (north section) of the combined 22.0 acreage on Mohawk Drive. Unfortunately, this acreage was zoned low density residential, but the Planning Commission and the Council approved the rezoning of this entire 22.0 site to General Business, which we are extremely thankful and appreciative of. However, concerns were indicated by members of both groups to what development might occur on the south end of this 22.0 site, which could possibly be unfavorable as a result of this 11.0 acreage site also being rezoned as General Business. We had assumed our purchase of the northern 11.0 acreage site would be more land than what we would require to construct our proposed 150 resident dementia and Alzheimer's care facility. However, due to the significant set -back developmental requirements, the associated wet land parcels on this acreage, in addition to the required fire lane around the property, we were informed by the architect that we could not construct our proposed development on this 11.0 acreage site. Rather than attempting to request certain "variances" from the City of Medina, we thought it would be best for us to also consider purchasing the southern 11.0 acreage, even though this would require a substantial additional financial investment. We also wanted to minimize any concerns by the Planning Commission and the Council to the future potential "unfavorable" development of this southern 11.0 acreage, which made this additional substantial financial investment to be justified and worthwhile. At this time, and probably for at least the next 5-7 years, we do not have any sincere interest in developing this southern 11.0 acreage unless the City of Medina approaches us to develop general assisted living senior apartments on this site. Therefore, we would appreciate your assistance In approving an "interim use permit' to enable this south 11.0 acreage to be utilized for agricultural purposes as a means to assist in paying the annual property taxes on this southern 11.0 acreage. We truly encourage all interested parties to review our Wealshire of Bloomington website (wealshireofbloomington.com) and the Wel!stead of Rogers website (welisteadofrogers.com), and we would also welcome the opportunity to provide anyone a tour of our prestigious Bloomington senior care facility. We would appreciate your assistance and cooperation to make our proposed senior development in Medina a reality. Please notify me if you have questions, or if I can be of greater assistance. I promise and assure you we will construct a beautiful and prestigious senior care campus in Medina. Sincerely and God bless, Thomas A. Wiskow President/CEO 10601 Lyndale Ave S. Bloomington, MN 55420 www.wealshireofbloomington.com Tel - 952.345.1900 Fax - 952.345.1906 e 2016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc: Call 48 Hours before d,c ur 811 or cc11811.com Common Ground Anion, Construction Plans for Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN Prepared for Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN Contact: Thomas Wiskow Phone: 952-345-1900 Fax: 952-345-1906 Prepared by: Westwood Phone (920) 253900S 970112th Street North, Suite 206 Far (320) 2534737 St. Cloutl, MN 36303 TO R. ( 00) e4 westwoodps.mm Westwood AMmbnel Servkes, Inc Project number: 0004724.00 Contact: Robert J. Olson Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 Cover 2 Existing Conditions & Removal Plan 3 Site Plan — Overall 4 Site Plan — Phase 1 5 Grading Plan — Overall 6 Grading Plan — North 7 Grading Plan — South 8 Grading Plan — Detail 9 Grading Plan — Detail 2 10 Mitigation Wetland Grading Plan 11 Mitigation Wetland Cross Sections 12 Mitigation Wetland Seeding Plan and Details 13 Utility Plan — Public Extension 14 Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Plan 15 Storm Sewer Plan 16 Erosion Control Plan 17 Details 18 Details 19 Details 20 Landscape Plan 21 Landscape Details Vicinity Map (Nat to Scale) NO. DATE REVISION SHM TS 1 04/15/16 PERMIT SET ALL PERMIT SET Construction Plans for Site, Grading, Utilities, and SWPPP for Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN Date 10/30/15 Sheet: 1 of 21 0004724CYFO1. 9wg 0 2016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance WETLAND BOUNDARY (TYP) 967 � 989 7 \ / BENCHMARK TNH= moo. Da 99 \ .995 / 996 3CE RpADWAf EASE_MENT F CHIPPEWA ROAD SB-18 EDGE OF FARM FIELD (TYP) sasol o— E 5w 10 30' ROADWAY \\EASEMENT / ^ I Removal Legend FASTING PROPOSED — — — — PROPERTY LINE SAW CUT PAVEMENT jRICTINR REMOVAl4 \\\\\\\\\\ CURB 6oGUTTER \\\\\\\\\X SANITARY SEWER \\\\\\\\\\ WATER MAIN HYDRANT STORM SEWER \\\\\\\\\\ GAS \\\\\\\\\\ UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC \\\\\\\\\\ OVERHEAD ELECTRIC \\\\\\\\\\ UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE \\\\\\\\\\ OVERHEAD TELEPHONE \\\\\\\\\\ TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC \\\\\\\\\\ CABLE TELEVISION 1141iiil14+r RETAINING WALL iii-Ne41t4-A- FENCE 1 1 r.' ". 1 CONCRETE BITUMINOUS rSZZE BUILDING TREE LIGHT POLE -X- TRAFFIC SIGN CONSTRUCTION BARRICADE 45 SB-19 a S13-19 SOIL BORING LOCATION TREE LINE Legal Description LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER PTLE COMMITMENT NG. 514215 Parcel 1. That port of the East 740 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lying North of the South 684 feet thereof, Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota Parcel 2, The South 684 feet of the East 740 feet of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota Surveyor's Notes 2. 5. 6. 7, B, SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY WESTW000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. ST. CLOUD. MN. DATED 11 /14/1 A THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE X (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN) PER PEVA COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 2705300.5E. TOTAL SITE GROSS AREA: 22.68 ACRES (998,133 SO. FT.) PROPERTY ADDRESS: UNASSIGNED SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED RURAL RESIDENTIAL -URBAN RESERVE. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 63. 1996 NO BUILDINGS EXIST ON THE SURVEYED PROPERTY. NORTHWESTERN BELL EASEMENT DOCUMENT NUMBER 5373063 WAS RELEASED ON FEBRUARY 26, 2015 E DOCUMENT NUMBER A10156543. THE RELEASED EASEMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE SURVEY. 11 50' 100' ISO' PERMIT SET Westwood 1Nestivaad Professional Services, Inc. 370112th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 58303 Phone 320-253-9995 Fax 320-253-6737 Tol Free 1-800-270-6995 westwoodps.mm °edam& Cheered Drawn: Record Drawlair by/date RevlMove RIO RA W I bee, certify tie mx Pr wra pep. by we ar men and twee..MGM. a ��dOw� Homed latOPMIONAL Robert J. OUon am 04/15/16 um.. Nw 45023 Prepared tor. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN realshire of [edina dina, MN Existing Conditions & Removal Plan Dete. 10/30/15 mu., 2 OP 21 0004724E2E01:Ew9 i 02016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance 10.00' -- BUILDING ADDITION FFE=998.50 FIRE LANE TURNAROUND plc /I 1 �1 10' D�IAGE & '1/ UTILITY EASEMENT 11 SB L2B Ault I1D.OD' t 20 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 2-0 GRAVE FIRE LANE PROPOSED BUILDIN FFE=998.50 SB-06 BEE=985.25 (SEE AR FUTURE ADDITION FFE=998.50 FUTURE FIRE LANE EDGE OF FARM FIELD SB-24 WE7LANbY' 100 YEARbMrf _98739_ MEE! g�i;��yy�®p®r eaa :�a'i9`l SB-17 . GTUPE ADCI➢"::. FFE=998.50 DRAINAGE & 'MITT EASEMENT SB-25 WETLAND MITIGATION AREA silis m_ - --- 3' ROADWAY EASEMENT BENCHMARK TNr=1000.o8 WETLAND BOUNDARY (TYR) 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT SB-2r�� \ DRAINAGE &` UTILITY EASEMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WOG— _ — �a WAY EASEMENT REPLACE PAVE IN KIND —128.90 4E 0 g1 I ZI I I I 30'I EXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENT 3' ROADWAY EASEMENT 7' FUTURE TURN LANE EASEMENT 28IDRAINAGE & UTI ITY EASEMENT STOP SIGN BUILgING SETBACK PARI(ING SETBACK 30EXISTING ROADWAY EASEMENT 3' ROADWAY EASEMENT 28' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT Site Legend EXISTING PROPOSED General Site Notes PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RETAINING WALL FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGN POWER POLE BOLLARD / POST DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD'VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS. DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 5. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3,0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 8. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 10. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY, REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. Site Development Summary • EXISTING ZONING: • PROPOSED ZONING: • PROPERTY AREA: • EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA: • EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: • PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA • PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA RR-UR, RURAL RESIDENTIAL -URBAN RESERVE BP - BUSINESS PARK 988,133 SF (22.68 AC) 961,303 SF (973%) 26,830 SF (2.7%,) 175,748 SF (PHASE I) 274,236 SF (OVERALL) • BUILDING GROSS SIZE'. PHASE I: LOWER LEVEL: 19,232 SF 1ST FLOOR: 83,041 SF PHASE II: LOWER LEVEL: 4,375 SF 1ST FLOOR: 56,207 SF TOTAL 162,85 SF • BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE: 50'=FRONT 75'=SIDE / 50'=SIDE TO ROW 75'=REAR • PARKING SETBACK: 35'=FRONT AND ROW 60'=SIDE AND REAR • BEDS: PHASE I: 84 BEDS PHASE II: 66 BEDS TOTAL: 150 BEDS • PARKING RATIO REQUIREMENT RETAII /OFFICE: TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: CITY OF MEDINA 1 SPACE / 3 BEDS 50 SPACES • PARKING PROVIDED: SURFACE: ADA 6 STALLS REGULAR 85 STALLS DROP OFF 4 STALLS TOTAL: 95 STALLS 11 50' 100' I50' 0' Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 370112th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 58303 Phone 320-259-9005 Fax 320-253-8737 Tol Free 1-800-270-0905 westwoodps.com °Wa e& Rp Cheeke& qp Daum: la Record DnMnR by/date RevlMove Ixmy certify Oat ax or w pep. bye we ar aean mama a� ek•. at u.r m Homed wwmw+ei Robert J. Olson n,„ 04/15/16 mr. Ns 45023 Prepared for. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN PERMIT SET Site Plan - Overall Date. 10/30/15 shave 3 OP 21 00047243PF01:dv9 0 2016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or co11811.com Common Ground Alliance Site Legend Westwood I 1 1 1 1 I I 11 1 I I I 1 1 1I I 10' 10' 75' B 09 1 \0 1/ I �1/ 1I V 1 1 1 11 A 1 15' 11 1 1 I�-/� 11 tl I I 11 A II 11 R 1 1 II 1 11 1 1 I 111 11 1 SB- 1 \ 1 I \\\\ BUILDING 1, I \SETBACK \ 1 I1 \ ` DRAINAGE & \ UTILITY EASEM�IN�\1\ \ R PARKSETBACK 'y\\I\ 1 \ I \\ 20' -GRAVEL- EIRE l AUF DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT __ TSB-�5 / / / / / //////////// ///�////;/ 20' GRAVEL FIRE LANE r SB-1 \ STOJ2MWATER POND / 7-� / / / 130' / / BUILDING ADDITION FFE=998.50 20' GRAVEL FIRE LANE / / ///////// ./ / / / 8 HIO METAL (TYP) —J L---J I 20' FIRE LANE [(FUTURE) 8' HIGH METAL FENCE (TYP) SECURED / COURTYARD 2/ /\ / / °• °' e° / 7777ii////////i/ SB-08 FENCE PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=998.50 BFE=985,25 BASEMENT LIMITS y 71 J — 7 — — L FUTURE ADDITION FFE=998. 50 L L 1 WETLAND BOUNDARY (TYP.) I L — L SB-08 e r WETLAND 1 100-YEAR HWL=987.39 20' FIRE LANE (FUTURE) / SB-20 ° ° TYP,)' DROP OFF STALLS L — — sB-4�— — FUTURE ADDITION FFE=998.50 -` f - i N I I1 I I i 411 MONUMENT SLGN (SEE ARCHITECTURAL) 58-03 s° —1 a 4J I PRAINAGd & I: TLI, EASEMENT N 38' I O �I I Or ENT FXISTING PROPOSED &MEE 4 General Site Notes PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LPL RETAINING WALL FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMEN GRAVEL NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGN POWER POLE BOLLARD / POST DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, ST. CLOUD, MINNESOTA, DATED 11/14/14. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 6. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 11. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. CI Site Details (SI-OXX) 1 B612 CURB & GUTTER 2 MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER 5 INTEGRAL CURB AND WALK 6 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 9 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 10 PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 14 SIGN INSTALLATION 15 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING 18 BOLLARD 18A REMOVABLE BOLLARD 19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS 25 CURB CUT WITH EROSION CONTROL MAT 32 BEAVERTAIL CURB (B612) 030' 60' 90' PERMIT SET Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 370112th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 58303 Phone 320-259-9095 Fax 320-253-8737 Tol Free 1-800-270-0905 wettwoodps.com UudpieR CbeArerk prawn: Record Drawl. by/date RIO Rm I® RevlMom I bee, enar oe wu er wra pep. w we ar maecured twee.. n mJamm. w� t w al upm . � Jim Homed owassectixc Robert J. Olson o w 04/15/16 uw. Nw 45023 Prepared for. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN Site Plan - Phase 1 Date 10/30/15 Sheet 4 OR 21 000,1724SPF02:dwg 1 Z / / p39 / M \ 8 004 _ _ — _ $ o a �S ^_ 21005 --NORTH AN 06� AMENDEEL'FOP$OIL pLONG SLOPES \ \ QiWEST OF FIRE LANE\ o4Dk: / � __-EBE£ C E 1_ZY I P9NP s� TOP-99Q.00 HWL=98939 / NWL=987 00 B044979. no / PROPOSED BUILDWi" FFE=998.50 Irll $8-06 � BEE=985.25 41 32 WETLAND BOUNDARY (TYP_) SR-24 20,488 SF WETLAND BUFFER I 02016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before rigging: 811 or ca11811 com Common Ground Alliance AMENDED TOPSOIL ALONG SLOPES NORTH AND WESTOF-FIRELANE `SEE NOTE 179 \ Op I^ it 5 1009 ona \I16oF \,e 9 I I 9 I / I I ll 1), li II I 29,295 SF NEW WEILAND — _a— --985- SB_996 SE-20 - WETLAND IMPACT /6 ., _- SF \ j / 1 ,14 1":;A / I ---s 16,543 SP // II A SB-2f- NEW WETLAND\ / X \ I / \_ s,349 SF7- o,'LWETLAND BUF -: AND AMENDED TOP aIL\ (SEE NOTE Grading Legend FXISBNG PROPOSED —980 - - --980- 982 82_-- (Wosl 1s69 R E.O.F. se" 85.00 PROPERTY LINE INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL SILT FENCE STORM SEWER FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER RETAINING WALL DRAIN TILE RIDGE LINE GRADING LIMITS RIP -RAP EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SPOT ELEVATION FLOW DIRECTION TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW OO INLET PROTECTION Grading Notes LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION- THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS. 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNOOT STANDARDS. 6. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. 8. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 9. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY -LOADED TANDEM -AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RECOMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. 14 15 16 EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3E1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3E2. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 17. AMEND EXISTING SOIL WITH 2 INCHES OF COMPOST TO ACHIEVE 8 INCHES OF UN -COMPACTED SOIL DEPTH WITH A MINIMUM ORGANIC CONTENT OF 5 PERCENT, OR PLACE 8 INCHES OF IMPORTED TOPSOIL OVER 4 INCHES OF SCARIFIED SOIL. AMENDED SOILS MUST PASS A 12 INCH PROBE TEST DURING FINAL INSPECTION. Wetland Mitigation T-3 WETLAND - INUNDATED - 81,718 SF T-2 WETLAND - 64,121 SF UPLAND BUFFER - 70,837 SF X o' 50100 PERMIT SET Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 370112lb Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 TdlFree 1-800-270-9495 westwaodPs.com Design t Checked: Drawn Rand Drawing by/data aN RP 169 Revisions: 1 ka. Mary ant am or wa PrPa4 q ae a ma w mamisn.eta aw 1. a u. ry u B. sammrx Robot J. Olsov Da. 04/15/16 urMr Nv 45023 Prepared for. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN Grading Plan - Overall Dabs 10/30/15 Sheet 5 OF 21 i 0 2016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance 0' WATERMAIN PLUG II I II II I I I•I I I I •I III \ II\ 271 LF-8' PVC C900 ee4� fee l BUILDING ADDITION FFE=998.50 • /I I \ \\ \ \\ STORMWATER POND 1 111 / I / / , 011 FUTURE ADDITION FFE=998.50 341 LF-8" PVC C900 �B RE=990.11 ----- ______-- 1,950.60 (5) PROPOSED BUILDIN FEE=998.50 BFE=985.25 u - 1 - - 25' WETLAND BUFFER (TYP.) II II 6: II I 1 ok. FI ITUPE ADDITION FFE=998.50 LA�s4 4 APET=987, 39_ EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY (TYP.) MH E=990.7 ,TE=379.25 (N T=979,5 ( 1E-979.25 12)- _979.15 (S(S). M/- wRE=987.30 978.20 (N) IE=978.20 (E) 978.10 (S) 1 / I � A L \ ALL \ � Ii PROPOSED WETLAND BOUNDARY\ 522 MH-\I alit May (TYP.) 51Ilz RE=98642 IE=972.20 (N) E=977.20 (E) 2IIE=977.10 (S) JIL JIL I I N E t FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CORE DRILL AND CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE �( -W1E=97675-- 300'-10' PVC SDP 26 ® 0.30 �• 0 �a n• • 8 I I E=9 E=9 88 =92 .(N) 55 =97 (W) . 88 97 8 (E) ,97 7 STU -4C -979,99 28' S PVC SDR 26 0 0.40% TEE{ STUM-30 E=11dd29.36 PVCI SDR 26 ® 0.40% 77 µF-8" PVC C900 BT TE HYqq )4/Aut vALVE GRy0 IELEV.b 989.9 13 F - 6" PVC C900 8' I I I TEE STU -2A =978.31 29' 8" PVC SDR 26 0 0.40% STU -1B = 77.32 29' 8" PVC SCR 26 0 0.40% HYD. /AU). VALVE GRI{0 ELEM=986.6 14 LF - 6" PVC CO00 TEE1 8"1466 BEND 631 F48 PLC b9uo Utility Legend FasTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER e� SANITARY SEWER Fu - SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN eel STORM SEWER I WATER MAIN Imo} HYDRANT GAS ems' UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC nor OVERHEAD ELECTRIC >uc UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE rCx OVERHEAD TELEPHONE rw TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC rry CABLE TELEVISION DRAIN TILE GATE VALVE ® FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) i1f LIGHT POLE VERTICAL UTILITY SEPARATION General Utility Notes 1. TI-.E CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. ]. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. 8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. 9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. 10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 11. DUCTILE IRON WATER LINES SHALL BE CLASS 52, PER AWWA C115 OR C151. COPPER WATER LINES SHALL BE TYPE K PER ASTM B88. PVC WATER LINES SHALL BE PER AWWA C900 AND INSTALLED PER AWWA C605 IF ALLOWED BY CITY. 12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 8' MINIMUM COVER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 13. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 26 OR SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D2241. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF A PRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TO MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 7560.0150. 14. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE CLOW F-5750 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. THE ELECTRICAL ALARM SWITCH SHALL BE PART NO. PCVS2 (OR EQUIVALENT). 15. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS -BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. 16. REPAIRS TO CHIPPEWA ROAD SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OR CITY ENGINEER. 17. PROVIDE NEENAH CASTING R-1755-G1 OR APPROVED EQUAL ON MH-1, 2, 3, 4 AND 4A. Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 270112th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 58303 Phone 320-253-9095 Fax 320-253-V37 Tol Free 1-000-270-9495 wettwoodps.mm ° dinned: Rp Checkeck qp or000 m Record Drawl/ by/data RevlYoem xImy malty ue mare re tywpremed by re me n mama a. Iw et u. aer el a em Robert J. Olson nm 04/15/16 urm. Nw 45023 Prepared for. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN Utility Plan - Public Extension BENCHMARK CHIPPEWA ROAD TNv=1000.ae 5 LF-8" PVC C900 �i€MOVE 12"x 12'_ TEE AND REPLACE WITH 12"x 12' CRO BE 45 LF-8' PVC C900 " GATE ALVE 2"x 8 R OUCER-- - 0' 50' 100' 150' PERMIT SET Dote. 10/30/15 Rbeae. 13 OF 21 000472.701:dwg i 0 2016 Westwood Professional Services, In Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.corn Common Ground Alliance 04 LF-8" PVC C900 8" WATERMAIN PLUG I II I I I I I /1 I 287 LF-8" PVC C900 J 444 / / w--S/ // / / / TEE / F / / / / / / / / / / YD. W/AUX. VALVE / RND ELEV.=993.2 /- JO LF- PVC C900 //// //, BUILDING ADDITION EFE=998.50 444 - 1 V/// 7) /// / ///° 1 1 1 1 341 LF-8" PVC C900 8" WATERMAIN PLUG -_B x_OL IEE_ __ -- - HYD. W/AUX. VALVE --_ GRND ELEV.=996.1 51 LF- PVC C900 / a / a / ////%//////// / PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=998.50 BFE=985.25 s 73/ l/%%//%/.3 LF-8 38 LF-4" PVC C900 4" DOMESTIC ER S 8" FIRE SERV CE VICE 38 LF-8" PVC C900 STUB-3C / 4"-90° BEND PVC C900 / MH-4 R€=9A0]t IE=980.50 (S) MAINTAIN 18" OF VERTICAL SEPARATION / / / / /1110:117. 'r -8 C900 C900 TEE /P���x FUTURE -SERVICES 8" FUTURE SERVICE / PVC SDR 26 0 p.52% I IE=9:.1 PVC SDR 26 0 0.52% CLEANOUT-313 8"x 6" TEE HYD. W/AUX. VALVE GRND ELEV.=991.6 17 LF- PVC C900 25 LF-8" PVC C900 8'3-45° BEND ,. 14 LF-8" PVC C90O PLUG r L _ _ WETLAND BOUNDARY (TYP.) IF J / / / zz / / / - L r WETLAND 100-YEAR HWL=98739 e 4" TEE 8" ANC C90 VC C900 • STUB-4B IE=980.24 HYD. W/AUX. VALVE GRND ELEV.=997.6 97 LF, 9'r/ I 6/z6- 6 4 6" TEE RE=993.72�HYD. W/AUX. VALVE IE=980.52 (W) GRND ELEV.=997.5 19 LF- PVC C900 E=980.42 (E) _ L - L FUTURE 'DDITION FFE=9' S 5U 44 1 WETLAND BOUNDARY .- (TYP.) P R PVC SDR 26 0 I 52� AIIGTAIFY 18" OF AL SEPARATION / / /MA]>Z" VERB CAL INTAIN SEPARATIOnN 20I9 LF-8" PVC C9C I - PVC SDR 26 0 0,52% • MH-3 RE=4 n 71 IE=979.25 (N) f IE=979,25 (n) IE=979.25 (E) IE=979.15 (S) MAINTAIN �f83(((OF ! r�0/ERij;CAL SEPARATI5IN-- %" WA -TERRAIN PP G 34 LF-8" PVC C9 44 11/ HHHRMII-; \ RE=987 30 IE=978.20 (N)� ,yyl IE=978.20 (E) nP IE=978.10 (S) /1 / 0 6 • i • 1 MH-44 RE=92.74 IE=9 .88 (N) 1E=979.88 (W) IE=97 .88 (E) IE=97'9.78 (S) STUB-4C IE=979.99 PVC SDR 26 0 0.40% .-3-3-8"x 8" TEE I8 I STUB-3D IE=979.36 PVC SDR 26 0 0.40% 77 LF-8" PVC C900 TEE HYD. VI'/AUX. VALVE GRND LEV=989.9 13 LF- PVC C900 201 LF-8" PVC C900 EE STUB-2A E=978.31 PVC SUR 26 0 0.40% Utility Legend EXISTING PROPOSED FIJ sks PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER e-0 SANITARY SEWER Fu - SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN eel STORM SEWER I WATER MAIN Imo} HYDRANT GAS ems' UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC nor OVERHEAD ELECTRIC vc UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD TELEPHONE TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC CABLE TELEVISION DRAIN TILE GATE VALVE FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) LIGHT POLE VERTICAL UTILITY SEPARATION General Watermain & Sanitary Sewer Notes 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE. INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO. OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. 8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. 9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. 10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 11. DUCTILE IRON WATER LINES SHALL BE CLASS 52, PER AWWA C115 OR C151. COPPER WATER LINES SHALL BE TYPE K PER ASTM 888. PVC WATER LINES SHALL BE PER AWWA C900 AND INSTALLED PER AWWA C605 IF ALLOWED BY CITY. 12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 8' MINIMUM COVER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 13. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 26 OR SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D2241. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF A PRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TO MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820. 14, ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 7560.0150. 15. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE CLOW F-5750 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. THE ELECTRICAL ALARM SWITCH SHALL BE PART N0. PCVS2 (OR EQUIVALENT). 16. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS -BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. 17. ALL MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN DO NOT REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS. Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 370112th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 58303 Phone 320-253-9095 Fax 320-25341737 Tol Free 1-800-270-0905 wettwoodps.com Dine* Checked Drerm: Record Drawbar by/dote 1U0 Rn J® RevlMovc I M. wads uiu mx or wra gamed h s ar maw n Math= a elne t w at u. � u ucened w xc Robert J. Olson n,,: 04/15/16 �. Nw 45023 Prepared for. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Plan PERMIT SET bete 10/30/15 Sheet 14 OR 21 00047240602:dwg 0 2016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance Utility Legend Westwood 1 I I I I I I I I CLEANOUT E=991.0 I 6" DRAINTILE IE=989.0 6" FES IE=991.00 FILTRATION SWALE ADD RIP RAP 1I0I EXISTING FES 15" CMF FES801 \ _ IE=989.78I\ I I I I STORM SEWER CLEANOUT 4 6" DRAINT IE=98r(.00 FILTRATION SHELF (SEE DETAIL) FILTRATION BASIN I / / 6PERFORATED DRA1/%6n- (TYP.) -------------- _1_2________A_S_T _ __ -CLEANO UT STRUCTURE CLEANOUT RE=996.50 RE=99RE=99.50 E=992.00 IE=992.00 E=992.00-- 12" NYLOPLAST STRUCTURE/ RE=996.ag IE=9� Dd 6" FES IE=992.00 41.11.11 12 NYLOPLAST / STRUCTURE RE=996. E=9920000 7� I / °✓ ///// - /✓ 12" NYLOPLAST STRUCTURE RE=997.00 ////�////// ------------- / 7/ / / / / / / / / / / FILTRATION BASIN FILTRATION BASIN PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=998.50 BFE=98525 i ////// //// / 6" PERFORATED DRAINTILE / (TYR.) CLEANOUT / RE=997.50 / 992.00 //// CB-505 RE=996.95 00 (E)w ////// BUILDING A05111oN FFE=998.50 / / / / ////<2>/�//1///, � / / STORMWATER POND SEE INSET A FOR SOUTH POND DETAIL // /U/ / / / cl 4 // / ✓4 i/, u FOUNT FOUNT /// 4 HDPE NYLOPLAST CB-507 RE=997.00 IE=994.00 (E) r- ILI" L_ STMH-202 RE=992.18 I IE=987.86 (NE) L IE=987.86 (W) - _ eat -201 RE=972992-- -- IE=987.34 (E) IE==\87-34 (W) RCP CL 5 ® 0.52% CBMH-405 RE=985.00 IE=982.00 (E) SUMP=980.00 CB-404 RE=985.85- IE=982.85 (S) CBMH-504 RE=996.95 IE=993.21 (W)- IE=993.21 (S) / 99 ,21 (SE) 65.-12 // 5 @ 1.22%° IN STUB NORTH-504 IE=993.4 IN STUB SOUTH-506 IE=993.0 -276-42" MH-506 HDPE ® 1.47% RE=997.70 IE=993.00 (NW) IE=993-00 (SW) IE=993. DO (NE) RCP C IE-982.60,'N) IE=961.33 (W) IE=981.33 (E) SUMP=9`78.33 24' 12" RCP CL 1s2""�i� rl� 5� r'i' 28'-12 -C- C S A 1.00% T WELL / LIFT STATION 402A RE= • 87.49 14.-12" 1E=981.c5 (W) RCP CL 5 ® 0.00% IE=983.'0 (E) VALVE VAULT-402 BOTTOM=•.67.00 RE=990.00 IE=983.50 (W) /// IE=983.50 (E) ® 1.00% / ///// �'T9FV9,��.OV -r//. /// - / / L .I . • STMH-401 RE=995.71 IE�90.00 (NW) E=992.00 (E) a RCP CL 5 CBM-503 H-503 RE=996.85 IE=9p2.15 (NW) IE=9 2. 5 ( W) =9 2.5 g 45.-12" RCP CL 5 d9 1124% 143.-18" RCP CL 5 A 0.52% N V (71 WIFE IE 111' 15" RCP CL 5 ® 0.45% BMH-501 E=992.85 IE=990.16 (W) !E=990.16 (E) P CL5®1.23% L _ CBMH-502 RE=994.79 IE=990. BO (NW) I IE=990.80 (E) STMH-203 j -- IRE=991-96 IE=989.20 (NE) -- _E=989,20 �(W) ee STMH-202A /lam WETLAND �==_TT I00-YEAR HWL=98739 IE=988.46 (E) IE=988 as (SW) / • / / co'/ RCP 18" RCP CL 5 ®0.52% _ i RCP CL S 5 ®0.52% / / PP • 25.-21T RCP CL 4 ® 0.65% S IE=990.001 -FETRATION SWALE -5 WLTE 4" DRAINTILF IE=987.00 FE,S.,620_ IE=990.51 91 �,C 5 ✓' ` N 4" FES IE=987.00 I - 01 99b.50 I ES 300 0.00 I I I I I �I �I O I I I EXISTING PROPl3Sm 570 175 PUL PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER w -Ill SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN eel STORM SEWER WATER MAIN I-rw. HYDRANT vac GAS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ax OVERHEAD ELECTRIC rvc UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE rw OVERHEAD TELEPHONE ran TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC cry CABLE TELEVISION •aa DRAIN TILE GATE VALVE ® FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) iK- LIGHT POLE VERTICAL UTILITY SEPARATION FILTRATION MEDIA General Storm Sewer Notes 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL STORM SEWER MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WIT= THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. 8. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 9. STORM SEWER PIPE: REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS. B. HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 10-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M252. HDPE STORM PIPE 12- TO 60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306. C. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM F949. D. HDPE AND PVC STORM PIPE SHALL HAVE FITTINGS PER ASTM D3212 AND BE INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321. E. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CMP) FOR SIZES 18- TO 120-INCH AND MUST MEET ASTM A760 OR ASTM A796 AND BE INSTALLED PER ASTM A798. CRP MAY NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A WATERMAIN, WATER SERVICE. OR A BUILDING. ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS AND STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0700. STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820. 10. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PAFT 7560.0150. 11. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS -BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. 12. ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET AND MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN DO NOT REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS. STORM SEWER CLEANOUT STORMWATER POND FILTRATION SHELF (SEE DETAIL) WOOD BAFFLE (SEE DETAIL) FES-601 IE=987.50� CLEANOUT RE=989.00 =987.00 6" DRAINTILE -' 6'/HOPE FES-800 E=988.00. / / I \ FES-200 / 1E-987.01 / /. / / � / / 2.3 36" RCP CL 3 ® 2.17% FES-600 =987.00 1> I" 6" OUTLET IE=987.00 Inset A 0' 30 60' 90' PERMIT SET Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 370112th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 58303 Phone 320-253-9095 Fax 320-25341737 Tol Free 1-800-270-0905 wettwoodps.com °e dam& Cheered Ibewn: Record Drawl. by/date R10 Rio J® RevlMom Ixay certify Oateb platwra pep. byae ar me an �u.Homed latOMMONAL MGM= tw al � Las Robert J. Olson n,,: 04/15/16 �. xw 45023 Prepared tor. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN Storm Sewer Plan Date 10/30/15 Sheet 15 OF 21 00047243TF03:dwg 02016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance A �/991 992� 093 /1 INST�EN ALL SILT FCE/ONCE. / SLOPES ARE EMAL GRABS / I 1 k m INSTALL SILT FENCE ONOE'- SLOPES ARE Ai FINAL GRADE PROPOSED BUILT FEE=998.50 BFE=985.25 98S —98y Erosion Control Legend EXISTNG pROPOSEO "8- 85.00 PROPERTY LINE INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL SILT FENCE STORM SEWER FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER RETAINING WALL DRAIN TILE RIDGE LINE GRADING LIMITS ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SPOT ELEVATION FLOW DIRECTION TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW INLET PROTECTION General Erosion Control Notes 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN —PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, EXISTING SILT FENCE ON —SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PODDING. DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. 3- EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL (ESC): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: CATCH BASIN INSERTS, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. ESC SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 4. ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. 5, PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST AND USED AS TEMPORARY PONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. 6. WHEN INSTALLING END —OF —LINE FLARED END SECTIONS, BRING THE SILT FENCE UP Er OVER THE FLARED END SECTIONS Er COVER DISTURBED AREAS WITH RIP RAP. THE UPSTREAM FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL HAVE WOOD FIBER BLANKET INSTALLED ON THE DISTURBED SOILS. ]. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE RESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR BE HARD SURFACE WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 8, THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED WITH A 25-151 SEED MIX AT 70—POUNDS PER ACRE AND TYPE I MULCH AT 2—TONS PER ACRE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE MN/DOT SEED MIX 22-111 AT 40—POUNDS PER ACRE AND TYPE I MULCH AT 2—TONS PER ACRE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 10. FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OR EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IS REQUIRED. 11. ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUND THEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 12. ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORAY SEDIMENT BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TO RESTORE THE POND TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION. 13. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 14. THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL —DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING OR OTHER MEANS REQUIRED TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS OR BUILDING PADS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW. 15. PUBLIC STREETS USED FOR HAULING SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SOIL AND DEBRIS, STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE CONCURRENT WITH SITE WORK. 16. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF SILT FENCE. 11 50' 100' I50' PERMIT SET Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 370112th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 58303 Phone 320-259-9005 Fax 320-253-8737 Tol Free 1-800-270-0905 wettwoodps.com °e dam& Cheered Drewn: Record Drawl. by/date Revlpoee Rp RA J® Ixmy wan. Oat mu Wby wra pep. ae ar me n MGM=a�laws al u.r Las Homed wwmw+ec Robert J. Olson n,„ 04/15/16 u„.. Nw 45023 Prepared for. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN realshire of [edina dina, MN Erosion Control Plan Date: 10/30/15 Sheet 16 OF 21 0004724ECFM:dwg 62016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. N akaimm SEED p2 te' MSTRIP AINTENANCE ROCK E EMULCH \-S S\ BUILDING AD DIj33N FFE=998.50 \\ \ 5-lEA _ 5-lEA i 6-TEA PROPOSED BUILDING FEE=998.50 BFE-985.25 e-suss PERENNIALS/CRA§ (TYR.) 2-5M5 33-133.Fu TORE 5RUBS \= ORNAMENTAL TREES � �� / `-_ SEEj$1� VETEEUAON// OVERSTORY-E-----— �// ORNAMENTAL g FUTURE TALTREES 1-ABH 5_OM12-3M61- BH � 5-SMS 2 ARH dill OA %I �� WETLANB BUFFER AREA (TIP.) �. , ESTIMATED LINE TO USE FOR SAL ATING /am LOT PERIMETER AREA (TOP_) • 1 TLHND 10 -YE HWL, 981.39 18MAINTENANCE STRIP WITH ROC MULCH (TYP_) SEED r L \ 1L 1 1 I I I PERENNIALS/GRASSES (TYV ) 2-sus BH 4-TEA 6-TEA STING TREE B." DI AMETEI2� BE REMOVED 1-SKH soD/sE �rw.) ORFNAVE'N'TAL _ ( 1 FUT�REES ¢RNAMENTAL LFEURTSLTRORY TREES RUBS 6 SEED 1 I I Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance `Plant Schedule CODE OTT. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING O.C. OVERSTORY TREES - 52 (8 FUTURE OVERSTORY TREES - SPECIES TBD) SUM T SUGAR MAPLE / ACER SACCHARUM 2.5" BB AS SHOWN SKH T SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST / GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. MEWS 'SKYCOLE' 2.5" BB AS SHOWN REO 9 RED OAK / OUERCUS RUBRA 2.5" BB AS SHOWN SWO 8 SWAMP WHITE OAK / QUERCUS BICOLOR 2.5" BB AS SHOWN ACE 13 ACCOLADE ELM / CLANS JAPONICA x WILSONIANA 'MORTON' 2.5" BB AS SHOWN ORNAMENTAL TREES - 38 (23 FUTURE ORNAMENTAL TREES - SPECIES TBD) POC J PROFUSION CRAB / MAWS 'PROFUSION' SSC 8 SPRING SNOW CRAB / MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' 2" BB 2" BB AS SHOWN AS SHOWN CONIFEROUS TREES - BHS 4 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE / PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA CCS 4 COLORADO GREEN SPRUCE / PICEA PUNGENS AUP 0 AUSTRIAN PINE / PINUS NIGRA SCP 0 SCOTCH PINE / PINS SYLVESTRIS TEA 63 TECHNY ARBORVITAE / THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 6' HT. BB 6' HT., BB 6' HT., BB 6' HT., BB 6' HT., BB AS SHOWN AS SHOWN AS SHOWN AS SHOWN SHRUBS - 237 (61 FUTURE SHRUBS - SPECIES MD) GRD 0 GRAY DOGWOOD / CORNUS RACEMOSA CAD 0 CARDINAL DOGWOOD / CORNUS SERICEA'CARDINAL' BLC 0 BLACK CHOKEBERRY / ARONIA MELANOCARPA SCJ 0 SCANDIA JUNIPER / JUNIPERUS SABINA 'SCANDIA CAV O COMPACT AMERICAN CRANBERRYBUSH VIBURNUM / VIBURNUM TRILOBUM 'COMPACTA' ABH ) ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA / HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS 'A NABELLE' DWE 106 DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS / EUONYMUS ALATUS NOMPACTUS' SMS 49 SNOWMOUND SPIREA / SPIRAEA NIPPONICA 'SNOWMOUND' LPS 14 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA / SPIRAEA JAPONICA 'LITTLE PRINCESS' 36" HT., POT 35" HT.. POT 35" HT.. POT 24" SPRD., POT 24" HT., POT 24" HT.. POT 24" HT.. POT 24" HT.. POT 18" HT., POT PERENNIALS/GRASSES 465 SF. APRICOT SPARKLES DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'APRICOT SPARKLES' NO. 1 CONT. M BAJA DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'BAJA' NO. 1 CONT. �J ICE CARNIVAL DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'ICE CARNIVAL' NO. 1 CONT_ 18" O.C_ PARDON ME DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'PARDON ME' NO.1 CONT. JOAN SENIOR DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS'JOAN SENIOR' NO. 1 CONT. STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'STELLA DE ORO' NO.1 CONT. ROYAL STANDARD HOSTA / HOSTA 'ROYAL STANDARD' NO.1 CONT. 16" O.C. THE BLUES LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS / SCHIZACHRYIUM SCOPARIUM 'THE BLUES' QUART POT BLAZE LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS / SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 'BLAZE' QUART POT KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS / CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' QUART POT RED SWITCH GRASS / PANICUM VIRGATUM 'SHENANDOAH' QUART POT 24" 0 C BUFFALO GRASS / BUCHLOE DACTYLOIDES 'LEGACY PLUGS BLACK EYED SUSAN / RUDBECKIA FULGIDA 'GOLDSTURM' QUART POT PURPLE CONEFLOWER / ECHINACEA PURPUREA 'MAGNAQUART POT '9 NOTES: • QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. • SEE LANDSCAPE DETAIL SHEET FOR ALL PLANTING DETAILS AND PLANTING NOTES. • REFER TO LANDSCAPE DETAIL SHEET FOR EXACT SEED MIXES PER PLAN_ Landscape Data CITY REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION 832.3 FOR BUSINESS PARK DISTRICTS: - ONE OVERSTORY OR CONIFEROUS TREE REQUIRED PER 50 FEET LOT PERIMETER. (2,945/50 = 59 TREES) - ONE ORNAMENTAL TREE REQUIRED PER 100 FEET LOT PERIMETER. (2,945/100 = 30 TREES) - ONE SHRUB REQUIRED PER 30 FEET LOT PERIMETER. (2,945/30 = 99 SHRUBS) CITY REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION B32.1.06 LOT, SETBACK AND BUILDING SIZE REQUIREMENTS: - CITY CODE ALSO REQUIRES THAT IF A SETBACK IS REDUCED FROM 100' DOWN TO 75' ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL THEN THAT 35' SETBACK AREA SHALL PROVIDE A 70% OPACITY YEAR ROUND. THE NORTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES NEED THIS REQUIREMENT MET. LANDSCAPING REQUIRED (BEYOND BUFFERYARD REQUIREMENTS): - PLANTINGS: - OVERSTORY/CONIFEROUS TREES 59 - ORNAMENTAL TREES 30 - SHRUBS 99 LANDSCAPING PROVIDED FOR ENTIRE SITE: - PLANTINGS: - TREES 161 (6,720 POINTS) - OVERSTORY 52 (2,600 POINTS) - CONIFEROUS 71 (3,550 POINTS) - ORNAMENTAL 38 (570 POINTS) - SHRUBS 139 (500 POINTS) - THE CURRENT PLANS SHOWS A 70% OPAQUE SCREEN ON THE NORTH SIDE AND A 50% OPAQUE SCREEN OF PLANTINGS ON THE WEST SIDE BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONED LOTS AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 11 0' 30' 60' 90' PERMIT SET Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 370112th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 58303 Phone 320-253-0495 Fax 320-253-8737 TNFree 1-800-270-0495 westwoodpsmm DUIpeei CEP CI:eche& RIO/CEP Dream CEP Record Dumb& by/dete Revisions: II bey unw ou wra r•rwrb lw ore ar one n ttiv ewe nmmaa� rue®. •ae�a•�ue we eres®.er Chad 6 P 04/15/16 er®w eln 46508 Prepared tor. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN Landscape Plan DMe 10/30/15 sheet 20 DP 21 0004724PLF01:dwg i 0 2016 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED CENTRAL LEADER. ONE GUYING AND STAKING AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP TES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX )OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. TAKING POSTS TO BE 2"x2" STAINED WOOD OPAINTED STEEL DE INEATOR POSTS PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUT l0E ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH ONG H POL E.NE,, POLYPROPYLENE R 4O MIL,5 1" WIDE STRAP PLA FIULCH, DEPTH AS SNENIOT PILE AG PNBT TRUNK FORM 3'. DEEP WATERING BASIN. SPECIFIEDBACKE. PLANT PIT WITH K FT SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. Foa R aPSEZEs XO FORNDARO MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT NEAREFINISHED GROUNDMNEOR SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND CHITH TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINEN GRADE. HED PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADEFE. GUYING AND YTAKING. AS AIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DI TOP OU DTAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. Borrom OF STAKE 3' (MI BELOW .OUND.G POSTS STAINED OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTSPOSTS. PLACE 3 EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 6 LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL, 1.5 WIOE STRAP. TREE %RAP MATERIAL FROMGROUNDLINE PVIARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, ASREQUIRED. PLACE MULCH, AN, DEPTH A SPECIFIED, LAST TRUNK OVER TS - DO NOT PILE FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN, BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR Nu3SERY pTDCK Are IwuuM BALL SIZE. LA E T BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. B I,a OR COMPACTED SOI a. MATCHING TREES NATURAL E N1lH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. ON COMPACTED SOIL SET MASS GROUNDLINEHMATCHING WITH FN SHED LGRADE. ALL PLANNNG BE. SHALL EIVE A" OF SPECIFIED MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC. EDGE ALL PLANTING BEDS `MTH SPECIFIED EDGER 1,ERE ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE BACKEILL PLANT PIT WI, SPECIFIED BACKE, SOIL R.OVE CONTAINER. SET SOIL MAiCHINGPRENNIALS NOni MOLND .OUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SHE GRADE ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 2' COMPOST SPECIFIEDEDGE ALL PLANTI EDGER NWHERES NTH ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS TS SIDES AND SCARIFY0 BOTTOM OF HOLE EXISTING L TOPSOIL, WELL MIRED. EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING LAL'mr LA29 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING LAZZAIS LA28 SHRUB PLANTING LAVorrir LA27 PERENNIAL PLANTING LA26 FINISHED GRASS a DEPTHHAP E0. MORE VERICAL ON LAWN SIDE LAWN GRASS SOILII 1=1I III-i ���\� PLANTING SOIL FINISH GRADE FOR LAWN EXISTING SOIL ANCHOR FLANGE VINYL STAKES DRIVE EL STAKE THROUGH (MAXIMUMH ANCHOR FLASPACING 6' 0C.). VINYL BED EDGING SPECIFIED MULCH PO LTA HGTOE BE MINIMUM OF 4 TOP ALEDGLOW R ADEQUATE LIP FOR SPECIFIED TOPSOIL N.T.S. SIDEWALK AGGREGATE SUBBASE EXISING SOIL LOWER HAN EHISTIMH os l"- PLANTING BED SOIL % TO BE MINIMUM OF a" BELOW AOEOUgIE EOHEFOR MULCH._ SPECIFIED MULCH SPECIFIED TOPSOIL NTS SPADED EDGE oLLn91 AOO VINYL EDGER LA10 w 1 SIDEWALK & PLANTER EDGE ILI LAIlT FINISH GRADE FOR LAWN 1SE MINIMUM WIDTH MAINTENANCE STRIP VINYL BED EDGING PLANTING BED SOIL MIX TO BE BA ADEQUAN E ROCK MULCH SPECIFIED TOPSOIL Y FROM BUILDING cxiealoR WAu EXISTNG GRADE CUT AREA PLANT ACCORDING DETAIILS TO PLANING APPLICABLE AS SHOWN BACKFILL AREA NOTE: TDE QTOF°LC E AN BicvAnoN TAIANATNESeoTTOMAOR T E PHOT REcnEUALr BENEATH NEATHHE A TPLANT TO INSURE ADEQUATEBDRAINAGE IN HEAVYF� SOIL S DRAINAGE. MAINTENANCE STRIP u�LA12 STEEP SLOPE PLANTING OS LA17 Seed Mix #2 33-252 ory Sale! Pond CmInciallea 3clallfw Naa Rao NOW Rap 06.4 IL 01 UM 1%b7.4 144141 mN We elaatnal Apdnopm0 oe& lid 130. 3AD% 530 Amman lash paw Dooamaner aysgxJer 13 1.1 3,1214 27 e0 Weal l Emma i4daue alma 115 250 140% 615 nvmw0 al rya Ora oanstleases .A0 .00 34416 911 slerWr wlwyyfp iEymrwpwaMswAa 4A1 4.0E e.10. 10.15 WOala Mad rya Elyaes rvpne. 2.W 250 507% 385 Panarun_waun 645 1 040 041% 205 10.e164egna _ Poor Patwerw 1TS .. 1.00 NM% 7539 Baas 54r3M1.09ra ram 1 S8 1.50 34D% 5.09 Telal Graaan 1 2014 1450 4213% 14544 monli m1104842 Asdeat meow., 9DT 0.01 0.1311 0.10 Pea Oebnpuprrca 010 . MSS 02114 050 CanaOe ewkllafcd Glasen..!n4,^aebAse 910 DOS 011% 0.10 ra . ,,,,.psa,d,,.nlncwex 010 D05 020% 020 WxeliyM moll R,6116 r:4.n:na 008 003 0175E 2411 Weexmil vamana to TeMNRaW1 811 010 033 0.50 _0]3% 1.15%.J.,W ay. Mil or 31334 44e31 lane Daher bsWlel4 0 Dr NY RA eeeaamended OMof 28 C2. ZS OO 05.02% 11,14 ToW Cmea Cvv_ 23.02 2600 311214 14.51 701314 aa32 , 400 10010x 15408 Wpwv. Teeeeetly Biome armies in, aalcu5mel Banana Pam,. ad E4alwn 36 4, Mello W, 738. 04e11W11 Aaai Tsslap Aspen ParKs a. Peaom Pnwi eee. rW001 0w nets 1 wwa0 BroaQeY Peal Seed Mix #1 25-111 Cesarean Nana Loa M>Ingeminee run Sala nu% Natas Rate ROW} Rate 0da1 x eN MW1 I%4.8 5.edar 4911 IAw 514 4,ar%e NaW t;y bloaaaaa Sims Randle eel twee CheMtlda Fescue Ha Mae Halm Fentress Pore parrp.s Lew Mo,ntrnorce Fes. orna FRWe1 TMPr1 Fait. 4gb4 sew eommlrtela Pace baMypl054 Ltlrs 40.36 36.00 16.3ex 114170 21.02 71.T3 1012 23.00 04 40 44 06 30 OS MAP 2M.61 15.37% 2A CM% 20.0014 11 Se% 0541E 100.00% 364.22 WO CO 1611151 34610 164.50 3071.22 Plaryeae: St uxde and drougtO edema Lwl,.. Rglea lwn famed map ere1 ban fa5kiodn tlaal mnwaNpnat berms. Pls., Ma: 54116s Planting Notes 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/Oft HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO. BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS. WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5, 3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2004 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH -BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/23 TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 4" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY -VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE OR SHRUB BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE- EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. MN/DOT SEED MIX 25-131 LOW MAINTENANCE TURF SHALL BE USED FOR ALL UPLAND SEEDING AREAS. MN/DOT SEED MIX 33-262 DRY SWALE-POND SHALL BE USED FOR ALL PONDING AREAS. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS -BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 370112th Street North, Suite 205 St. Cloud, MN 58303 Phone 320-253-0445 Fax 320-253-8737 TolFora 1-800-270-4445 westwoodpl.mm 11a e& meeked Aatva: Record Drawbar by/data CEP ap/ems ear Re/Wove Formal Estas Na wm rep. es a morew Lw warnyAmmaathwa a'a'a. Rw, MOP ` a,esm.e. 04/15/16 ere 46508 Prepared tor. Wealshire, LLC 10601 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN Wealshire of Medina Medina, MN Landscape Details PERMIT SET Date. 10/30/15 shade: 21 of 21 0004724PLF01dwg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11111111 OEAST BUILDING ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Titil 11111111 �, ONORTH BUILDING ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0 0 m O 0 SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION m 1 m 0 0 13 0 ---- ---- ==== 13 14 II I T I I�II�I11�� LIM lifi m I 11 Typical Roof I i O' _ 1 I,z" T.O. Wainscot Firsstt Level i---1111111111 m z 11 Typical Root 0'- I/2" T.O. Wainscot —/ 103' - 0" first Level `I00' 0" Lower Level 19 T 86' - 3" Typical Roof 10'- I I/2" T.O. Wainscot . 03' - O" _First Level —• 100' - 0" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0 0 ' i e iypiea Boor L 11 11 1 11 111 I IT 011 �11 LLJ �I L 11 11 I 11 ,. T, 1 11 .� - 110, 11/2" T.O. Wainscot 103' - 0" Fir„, rcl OWEST BUILDING ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0 0 I / i__L \ Fr I I > I IT 11 �>v 11���--•-- � I f I I O � a► -n I I 11 �� 11 1 I SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION — NORTH BUILDING SCALE: 06" = 1'-D" r- - _ I�ill v 1111i1� 111111111 I I J I ® IIi� I r = yp cal Roof 0 1 1/2 'I �I Or 7 T.O.T O. WanscotO III �— _ A }� _ F ret Level • EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE ASPHALT SHINGLES: GAF FIELD BRICK: MANUFACTURER: GLEN-GERY TYPE: SUMMERSET SIZE: UTILITY TYPE: TIMBERLINE COLOR. HEATHER BLEND ACCENT BRICK: MANUFACTURER: CLOUD CERAMICS TYPE: GREYSTONE VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY PREFINISHED METAL FLESHING: MANUFACTURER: UNA-CLAD TYPE: STEEL SEE SPEC. COLOR. SIERRA TAN ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE (PRECASTS MANUFACTURER: AMERICAN ARTSTONE COMPANY FINISH: TIED COLOR: TBD SOFFIT 4 FASCIA: MANUFACTURER: ROLLER TYPE: ALUMINUM) SEE SPEC. COLOR: SANDCASTLE STONE: MANUFACTURER: VETTER STONE PATTERN/SIZE. MINNESOTA QUARRY CREEK COLOR) NATURAL STRATA OR MANUFACTURER: BUECHEL STONE CORP. PATTERN/SIZE. MILL CREEK COLOR: TAILORED BLEND ALUMINUM WINDOWS. MANUFACTURER: SEE SPEC. FINISH: ANONDIZED COLOR MEDIUM BRONZE FIBERGLASS WINDOWS. E MANUFACTURER: SEEESPEC FINISH: S S COLOR. WHITE STUCCO SYSTEM: MANUFACTURER: SYNERGY FINISH. TBD COLOR: TBD ELEVATION KEYED NOTES ELEVATION KEY NOTES . NOT ALL KEYED NOTES ARE ON ALL PLANS 2, All MECHANICAL ROOF PENETRATIONS SHALL MATCH ROOFING COLOR 3. IN ADDITION TO 5TUCC0 CONTROL JOINTS SHOWN ON ELEVATION PROVIDE CORNER BEAD AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS AND INSIDE CORNER EXPANSION AT ALL INSIDE CORNERS 4, ALL EXPOSED CMU OR CONC. BELOW STUCCO SHALL RECEIVE PAINTED FINISH. 8, BRICK LEDGE SHALL BE 8" BELOW EST FLOOR ELEVATION AT SLAB ON GRADE AREAS. G. BRICK LEDGE SHALL BE MINIMUM 8" BELOW FINISY GRADE. TYPICAL 7. BRICK LEDGE SHALL STEP MINIMUIM 2'-7 VERTICALLY 44-0" HORIZONTALLY AT LOWER STRUL S. COORDINATE WICIVIL4 8, BASE OF STUCCO 8" MIN ABOVE FINISH GRADE 3. EXPOSED CMU/OP CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE PAINTED O® STUCCO - COLOR I -TY, STUCCO - COLOR 2 ( I A) - TYP. 11 ASPHALT SHINGLES - TYP. 2l PRECAST CAP. BRACKETS, SILL O FIELD BRICK- COLOR I - TYP. O ALUMINUM WINDOWS -TP. 22 WOOD TRUSS OACCENT BRICK -COLOR 2 -ROWLOCK 13 ALUMINUM DOOR-TYP. 23 CONTROL JOINT .0 ACCENT BRICK- COLOR 2 - SOLDIER COUPSE 14 HOLLOW METAL DOOR - TYP. 24 MECH. PENETRATIONS .SEE MECH. COORDINATE LINTELS WISTRUCTURAL SO ALUMINUM CLAD FASCIA- TYE 15 GARAGE DOOR 25 STUCCO ACCENT BAND - COLOR 2 © GUTTER- TYP, 16 RIDGE VENT -TYP. ES,'COMPOSITE TRIM PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING OVER O CT DIRECT TO DOWNSPOUT CONNECT RAINWATER 0SKYLIGHT 0EXPANSION JOINT OFIBERGLASS WINDOWS - DTP. 0GUARDRAIL-TYP. 28 THRU WALL DRASS RAIN WATER LEADER W/ SCREEN 9O COMPOSITE TRIM AND PANELS -TYP. 0 PRECAST SILL - 0,. 29 ROOF VENT Lp COMPOSITE WINDOW SURROUND - TYP- 2p STONE VENEER 30 l2" STROFOTH CO ACCENT COLOR. VERIFYAMWIW3/4"ITH STUCARCHITECT WEALSHIRE OF MEDINA - PHASE I BUILDING ELEVATIONS Architecture Planning Interiors A5.1 '01=21 06 111 CJ nllllp 10 O ' v �C. e --C — TypiIcal Roof I10'- I/2 First Level 100' - O^� OTYPICAL HIP ELEVATION W/STUCCO SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 11 12lid/ 6 F- OTYPICAL GABLE ELEVATION W/STUCCO SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 12 / 12 fit 0 0 ®1II`i�lll �•�, II �®, 46 Gable Roo_ f e -� 1 III ITYF - 11//2"" —�� ' 110 - I I/2" ITyp cal Bay ,F, 1111111 � 0 9 VARIES I SEE PLAN � (1A) HIP SIDE ELEVATION NOTE: HIP RETURNS VARY, SEE PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS Gable Roof Extension Typical Roof T.O. Wa mscot o3'-O"� s Le I (4A) GABLE SIDE ELEVATION NOTE: GABLE RETURNS VARY, SEE PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS T.O. Waesco _ First Level - 100' - 0" © A 00 0 wwlwl�IrT 00 rl pi ��0 ®� tfg$IM �� 11 O 12 61 12 —16 „7-00 O O C --C O O O �C 7 �I I �I J ' \11 0 —CJ ICJ Typical Roof 10- I1/�2" Fest Level 100' - 0"/ STUCCO ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"' = 1'-0" 0 PARTIAL ELEVATION -WEST BLDG ELEVATION FROM NORTH SECURED COURTYARD SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Typical�f Ila-Luz" T.O. Wainscot 10EYKS First Level 100-0"e 11 11 ICJ CJ� —CJ O CJ I2 13 —CJ— Typical Roof 110'- II I%2"� First Level 05 WAINSCOT + STUCCO ELEVATION G PARTIAL ELEVATION - SOUTH BLDG ELEVATION FROM NORTH SECURED COURTYARD SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" V SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" yzal2le Roof 110' - I 0 3/4"\ Typical Roof I I0- I I/2" Typic2" al Bay Roof/T 09 T�O. Wainscot Di _ First Level CJ-- 19 12 6 F— / v O CJ�'. Lower Level Access Drive \ Lower Level Access Area Shown Dashed, see I/A5.3 VARIES I- SEE PUN I. 07 TYPICAL GABLE ELEVATION - BAY UNITS W/STONE (7A) GABLE SIDE ELEVATION p BUILDING ELEVATION LOWER LEVEL ENTRANCE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" NOTE: GABLE RETURNS VARY, SEE PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS 8 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 12 61 000r- MW 20 O I 2 6� ( ZO 1 13 1� I L-s�J 12 UM. Porch Gable Roof ension Entry Gable Roof 110 -0°B _Porc�Gab� ROQ� Typical Roof 10 • 11/2 � Typical Bay Roof III III 103 -O e' 100'-0 —CJ— CJ— -CJ� 1-- O V3\ 20) 20 /try Gable Roof TO 63 Por h abJg R>Lof� Porch Gable Roof Extension 115' - 1 I /4". Typlral Roof I10'- I I%2"4 T.O. Wyescot 03' 0_e Flrst Level PARTIAL ELEVATION - MAIN ENTRANCE 0 PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION -MAIN ENTRANCE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 113I I MKS 191 IGI 12 I y� --CJ— --CJ— /�� �( 5, --CJ— I—CJ--1 —C.l —CJ-- —CJ— 7 711 �"ilIll �/ In 1a ; o -- J oT> '1G L-s�J CJ �CJ� / �i_J— --CJ— — J� Typical Roof I IO'- V5' First Level B 100'-O OPARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION - BETWEEN NORTH + SOUTH BUILDINGS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 12 —1fi 0PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION OF SOUTH BUILDING SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Typical Roof 110' - I I%2„e First Level -�\12 / f\LAv of �V / / / \ \ VLr-\\ Typical Boor CJ Oj CJ= 0 — CJ CJ— I—CJ © --CJ B —CJ Oj CJ— ! ,,V1_�v 1—CJ—I �(s) ' T n .I 5 T' IQ•- 1—T 1 �i/ `O I��■ pre mi 7 1 ® Will' 1 1 0 ir -7 7— 1 O Ell1� i( 31�0 14T 0 I�rJ1� ' -0 —�—_ — I�RJI J--1 r �r1� �i-J— --CJ—� •- Frnt Level� ELEVATION KEYED NOTES DeSTUCCO -COLOR -TP. STUCCO -COLOR 2 (I A) - M. OFIELD BRICK - COLOR 1 -TYP. C. ACCENT BRICK - COLOR 2-ROWLOCK OACCENT 4 BRICK- COLOR 2 - SOLDIER COURSE 0 ALUMINUM CLAD FASCIA-TYR. O GUTTER -TYP. ODOWNSPOUT CONNECT DIRECT TO RAINWATER DRAIN -MP. OFIBERGLASS WINDOWS -TYP. 0 COMPOSITE TRIM AND PANELS - TYP. Lp COMPOSITE WINDOWSURROUND -TYP. 11 ASPHALT SHINGLES - 'MP. OALUMINUM WINDOWS - MP. OALUMINUM DOOR -TYP. 0 HOLLOW METAL DOOR -MP- 15 GARAGE DOOR QRIDGE VENT -TYP. eSKYLIGHT 16 GUARDRAIL -TYE 0q PRECAST SILL -TYR. 20 5TONE VENEER 21 PRECAST CAP, BRACKETS. SILL 0, WOOD TRUSS 23 CONTROL JOINT SKJA MECH. ATIONS . 5EE MECH. COORDINATERLIINTELS W/STRUCTURAL g STUCCO ACCENT BAND - COLOR 2 26 PREFNISHED METAL FLASHING OVER COMPOSITE TRIM 0 EXPANSION JOINT 28 THRU WALL BRASS RAIN WATER LEADER VA/ SCREEN aROOF VENT I/2"STYROFOAM WITH 3/4"STUCCO K3CM ACCENT COLOR. VERIFY WITH ARCHITECT ELEVATION KEY NOTES 1. NOT ALL KEYED NOTES ARE ON ALL PUNS 2. All MECHANICAL ROOF PENETRATIONS SHALL MATCH ROOFING COLOR 3. IN ADDITION TO STUCCO CONTROL JOINTS SHOWN ON ELEVATION PROVIDE CORNER BEAD AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS AND INSIDE CORNER EXPANSION AT ALL INSIDE CORNERS 4. ALL EXPOSED CMU OR CONC. BELOW STUCCO SHALL RECEIVE PAINTED FINIS, 5- BRICK LEDGE SHALL BE 8" BELOW FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION AT SLAB ON GRADE AREAS. G. BRICK LEDGE SHALL BE MINIMUM 8'' BELOW FINISI GRADE, TYPICAL T. BRICK LEDGE SHALL STEP MINIMUIM 2'-0" VERTICALLY 4 4'-0" HORIZONTALLY AT LOWER LEVEL ACCESS. COORDINATE W/CIVIL s STRUCTURAL 8. BASE OF STUCCO 8" MIN ABOVE FINISH GRADE 9. EXPOSED CMU/CIP CONCRETE FOUNDATION WM.2 SHALL BE PAINTED EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FIELD BRICK: MANUFACTURER: GLEN-GERY TYPE: SUMMERSET SIZE: UTILITY ACCENT BRICK. MANUFACTURER: CLOUD CERAMICS TYPE, GREYSTONE VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE (PRECAST): MANUFACTURER: AMERICAN ARTSTONE COMPANY FINISH:TBD COLOR: TBD STONE. MANUFACTURER, VETTER STONE PATTERN/SIZE: MINNESOTA QUARRY CREEK COLOR: NATURAL STRATA OR MANUFACTURER: BUECHEL STONE CORP. PAUERIJ/SIZE MILL CREEK COLOR: TAILORED BLEND STUCCO SYSTEM: MANUFACTURER: SYNERGY FINISH: TBD COLOR: TBD ASPHALT SHINGLES: MANUFAC I UKEK: GAF TYPE: TIMBERLINE COLOR HEATHER BLEND PREFINISNED METAL FLASHING: MANUFACTURER, UNALUD TYPE: STEEL; SEE SPEC. COLO, SIERRA TAN SOFFIT 4 FASCIA: MANUFACTURER: ROLLE, TYPE. ALUMINUM: SEE SPEC. COLOR: SANDCASTLE ALUMINUM WINDOWS. MANUFACTURER: SEE SPEC. FINISH: ANONDIZED COLOR: MEDIUM BRONZE FIBERGLASS WINDOWS: MANUFACTURER: PELLA FINISH: SEE SPEC COLOR: WHITE WEALSHIRE OF MEDINA - PHASE I Bun Architecture Planning Interiors A5.2 13 PARTIAL ELEVATION - NORTH ELEVATION OF SOUTH BUILDING SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" (201 Gable Roof Extensors �raple3oaf Typical RooF II 10 I I/2" Typical Bay RooF� 0109 Z T.O. Wainscot First Level EDGE (NE CORNER OF EAST FACING BAY BTWN GRIDS D/E.8) BRICKqLEDGE (GRIDS D/20) p Lower Level 1'86' - 9" PARTIAL ELEVATION — NORTH ELEVATION OF NORTH BUILDING ® LOWER LEVEL ACCESS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Typical Roof 112- I U2" T.O. Wainscot .71 03'- O" First Level Lower Level ICI SEE CIVIL OPARTIAL ELEVATION — EAST ELEVATION OF NORTHrBUILDING a LOWER LEVEL ACCESS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0° LANDSCAPE PLANTING BED �4 EQUAL FTG W/(3)#5 SHOWN DASHED LANDSCAPE PLANTING BED PRECAST CAP SHOWN DASHED STONE VENEER STEP VENEER LEDGE MINIMUM 2" BELOW FINISH GRADE. SEE CIVIL JAMB COLUMN W/(4)#4 W/#3 TIES ttP @ EACH SIDE I 2'-2° FTG W/(2/#5 SHOWN DASHED PRECAST CAP JOINT SHOWN DASHED 'PRECAST CAP SHOWN DASHED SIGNAGE (BOTH SIDES OF SIGN @ ENTRANCE DRIVE) STONE VENEER PROVIDE (2) GRADE MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURES, EACH SIDE. COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH OWNER FOR ILLUMINATION OF FACILITY SIGNAGE BOLLARDS, SEE CIVIL N �4 30 ELECTRONIC SIGNAGE REFER TO SIGNAGE MFR FOR ELEC 41NTALL REQ.. IC 3'-0 €fl 8 11 44 (-1 11991 I Gable Roof Extension I IS'- II I%2"� rypieal T.O. wainscot 103�0" First Level 100'-0"s PRECAST CAP " OVERHAND W/DRIP EDGE EACH SIDE FACILITY SIGNAGE APPLIED TO BOTH SIDES, REFER TO SIGNAGE MFR FOR INSTALLATION REQ 4 FINAL LOCATION STONE VENEER W8X 1OX3"LONG EMBEDS FOR BRICK ANGLE GX4Xi BRICK ANGLE JAMB COLUMN W/(4)#4 VERT W/#3 TIES 1YP @ EACH SIDE r 7 AS DIMENSIONED, I i EMBED #4 BARS 2'-0" INTO I'$" CONC PIER BELOW I I I I l5'-0° PROVIDE (2) GRADE MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURES, EACH SIDE. COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH OWNER FOR ILLUMINATION OF FACILITY SIGNAGE BASE FLASHING. 5EE SIGN MFR REQ. ADDRESS SIGNAGE (AS REQUIRED) PRECAST CAP 1 I"OVERHAND W/DRIP EDGE EACH SIDE - STONE VENEER STEP VENEER LEDGE MINIMUM 8" BELOW FINISH GRADE SEE CIVIL REFER TO ELECTRICAL FOR LIGHTING 4 POWER OF MEDINA PROVIDE (2) GRADE MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURES. COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH OWNER FOR ILLUMINATION OF FACILITY SIGNAGE SOUTHEAST SITE SITE MONUMENT SIGN — ELEVATION + SECTION SOUTI.-EAST SIGNAGE WALL CONSTRUCTION. 4" STONE VENEER 2"AIR SPACE 8" CIP CONCRETE 2" AIRE SPACE 4" STONE VENEER PRECAST CAP "OVERHAND W/DRIP EDGE EACH SIDE FACILITY SIGNAGE REFER TO SIGNAGE MFR. FOR INSTALLATION REQ 6 FINAL LOCATION — STONE VENEER #4 HORIZ @ 12"0C #4 VERT @ 18"OC EMBED 2'-0" INTO I'-V CONC THRU WALL FLASHING 4 WEEPS 8" MINIMUM ABOVE FINISH GRADE. SEE CIVIL STEP VENEER LEDGE MINIMUM 8" BELOW FINISH GRADE. 5EE CIVIL #4 U-BAR @ I G"OC SIGNAGE WALL CONSTRUCTION: 4" STONE VENEER 2" AIR SPACE B" GIP CONCRETE 2" AIRE SPACE 4" STONE VENEER 3 TIES @ JAMBS #4 U-BAR @ I G'OC LANDSCAPE PLANTING BED 2'-8"FTG w/(3) .� TYP EACH q' I LOCATION • ertL GX4,01 BRICK ANGLE 0-AM111111 ELECTRONIC SIGNAGE (BOTH 51DE5 OF SIGN @ ENTRANCE DRIVE) REFER TO ELECTRICAL FOR LIGHTING 4 POWER BASE FLASHING, SEE 51GN MFR. REQ. #4 HORIZ @ 12"0C #4 VERT @ 18"0C EMBED 2' 0" INTO I' 8" CONC L-J PRECAST CAP I" OVERHAND W/DRIP EDGE EACH SIDE FACILITY SIGNAGE APPLIED TO BOTH SIDES. REFER TO SIGNAGE MFR. FOR INSTALLATION REQ 4 FINAL LOCATION #3 TIES @ 18" OC MAX 5TONE VENEER (2)#4 HORIZ @ I MC W8X I OX3" LONG, g'O HOLES TO TIE TO REBAR THRU WALL FLASHING fi WEEPS 6" 8 2° PRECAST CAP I"OVERHAND W/DRIP EDGE EACH SIDE STONE VENEER THRU WALL FLASHING *WEEPS 8" MINIMUM ABOVE FINISH GRADE, SEE CIVIL STEP VENEER LEDGE MINIMUM 8" BELOW FINISH GRADE. 5EE CIVIL ELEVATION KEYED NOTES O® STTUUCO -O2 -Itt-ttP. OFIELD BRICK - COLOR I -ttP. OACCENT PRICK - COLOR 2-ROWLOCK OACCENT 4 BRICK - COLOR 2 - SOLDIER COURSE 0 ALUMINUM CLAD FASCIA -TYP- O GUTTER-TYR ODOWNSPOUT CONNECT DIRECT TO RAINWATER DRAIN -TP. OFIBERGLASS WINDOWS -ttP. 0 COMPOSITE TRIM AND FANELS • TOY. Lp COMPOSITE WINDOW SURROUND -TYR. )) ASPHALT SHINGLES -ttP. 0 ALUMINUM WINDOWS -TYP. 0 ALUMINUM DOOR - TAP. Lq HOLLOW METAL DOOR -TYP- 0 GARAGE DOOR 0 RIDGE VENT -TYR. iT SKYLIGHT 0 GUARDRAIL -TYR )q PRECAST SILL -ttP. 20 STONE VENEER 0 PRECAST CAP, BRACKETS, SILL 22 WOOD TRUSS CONTROL JOINT MECH. PENETRATIONS . SEE MECH. COORDINATE LINTELS W/5TRUCTURAL 25 STUCCO ACCENT BAND - COLOR 2 26 PRERNISHED METAL FLASHING OVER COMPOSITE TRIM 0 EXPANSION JOINT 28 THRU WALL BRASS RAIN WATER LEADER W/ SCREEN 29 ROOF VENT l/2"STYROFOAM WITH 3/4"STUCCO ao Accenir colon. vewFY waH ARcwrecT ELEVATION KEY NOTES NOT ALL KEYED NOTES ARE ON ALL PLANS 2. All MECHANICAL ROOF PENETRATIONS SHALL MATCH ROOFING COLOR 3. IN ADDITION TO STUCCO CONTROL JOINTS SHOWN ON ELEVATION PROVIDE CORNER BEAD AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS AND INSIDE CORNER EXPANSION AT ALL INSIDE CORNERS 4. ALL EXPOSED CMU OR CONC. BELOW STUCCO SHALL RECEIVE PAINTED FINISH. 5- BRICK LEDGE SHALL BE 8" BELOW FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION AT SLAB ON GRADE AREAS. G. BRICK LEDGE SHALL BE MINIMUM 8" BELOW HAI, • GRADE, TYPICAL T. BRICK LEDGE SHALL STEP MINIMUIM 2'-0" VERTICALLY 4 4'-0" HORIZONTALLY AT LOWER LEVEL ACCESS. COORDINATE W/CIVIL 4 STRUCTURAL B. BASE OF STUCCO 8" MIN ABOVE FINISH GRADE 9. EXPOSED CMU/CIP CONCRETE FOUNDATION WA...-. SHALL BE PAINTED EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FIELD BRICK: MANUFACTURER:GLEN-GERY TYPE: 5UMMERSET SIZE; UTILITY ACCENT BRICK: MANUFACTURER: CLOUD CERAMICS TYPE: GREYSTONE VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE (PRECAST): MANUFACTURER: AMERICAN ARTS -TONE COMPANY FINISH: TBD COLOR. TBD STONE: MANUFACTURER: VETTER STONE PATTERN/SIZE: MINNESOTA QUARRY CREEK COLOR. NATURAL STRATA OR MANUFACTURER: BUECHEL STONE CORP. PATTERN/SIZE: MILL CREEK COLOR. TAILORED BLEND STUCCO SYSTEM: MANUFACTURER: SYNERGY FINISH: TBD COLOR. TBD ASPHALT SHINGLES: MANUF IUKEK: GAF TYPE. TIMBERLINE COLOR. HEATHER BLEND PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING: MANUFACTURER: UNA-CLAD TYPE STEEL: SEE SPEC. COLOR. SIERRA TAN SOFFIT k FASCIA: MANUFACTURER: ROLLER TYPE ALUMINUM: SEE SPEC. COLOR: SANDCASTLE ALUMINUM WINDOWS: MANUFACTURER: SEE SPEC. FINISH: ANONDIZED COLOR: MEDIUM BRONZE FIBERGLASS WINDOWS: MANUFACTURER: PELLA FINISH: SEE. SPEC COLOR WHITE #4 HORIZ @ 12" MAX SPACING - #4 HORIZ @ 14" MAX SPACING 6" 1,-8° 6" I, 2'-2" / colvc PIER � (2)#4 @ 18" OC IN 14" CONC WALL 242"5(12" FTG W/(205 CONT WEALSHIRE OF MEDINA - PHASE I BUILDING ELEVATIONS Architecture Planning Interiors ENTRANCE DRIVE OSITE MONUMENT SIGN — PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ENTRANCE DRIVE 0 SITE MONUMENT SIGN — ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ENTRANCE DRIVE QSITE MONUMENT SIGN — SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A5.3 Agenda Item # 8B Member _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-xx RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON COMANCHE TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SAME WHEREAS, a feasibility report has been prepared by Steve Scherer as the city's Public Works Director regarding a street improvement project for Comanche Trail; and WHEREAS, the project consists of miscellaneous milling, overlay, shouldering, and minimal asphalt curbing for drainage purposes described in the report; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the project is necessary, cost-effective and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the city of Medina, as follows: 1. The feasibility report is hereby accepted and the project is determined to be necessary, cost-effective and feasible. 2. The project shall be constructed using competitive bids received by the City of Medina. 3. The city council shall consider the making of such improvements in accordance with the feasibility report and assessing benefited properties in accordance with the city's special assessment policy and pursuant to Minn. Stat., Chapter 429. The estimated total cost of the project is as follows: • Comanche Trail $15,522 4. Public hearings to consider the making of such improvement and the levying of special assessments related thereto shall be held at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers at Medina city hall on the following dates: • Comanche Trail June 7, 2016 5. City staff is authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for making the project. Resolution No. 2016-xx May 3, 2016 6. City staff is directed to prepare the appropriate notices for the improvement hearings and assessment hearings and to cause the proper published and mailed notices to be given for the public hearings as required by law and in accordance with the above schedule. 7. The amount of the project to be specially assessed against benefited properties in accordance with the city's special assessment policy and Minn. Stat. Chapter 429 is as follows: • Comanche Trail $15,522 8. The city clerk, with the assistance of city staff, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for each such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the area affected without regard to cash valuation and shall file a copy of the proposed assessment in the clerk's office at city hall. Dated: May 3, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-xx 2 May 3, 2016 1VIEDINA Feasibility Report Comanche Trail Overlay Project City of Medina Prepared by: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director City of Medina — Comanche Trail Overlay Project Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Summary and Recommendations 4 3.0 Street Improvements 5 4.0 Figure 1 — Typical Section — Overlay 5.0 Cost Summary 6 Table 1 — Proposed Improvements Cost Summary 7 6.0 Funding Options 8 7.0 Project Schedule 9 Appendix A — Cost Estimate A-1 Appendix B — Map of Assessment Area and Proposed Improvements B-1 Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 2 City of Medina — Comanche Trail Overlay Project 1.0 Introduction City staff has requested this report to determine the feasibility of improvements to Comanche Trail. Comanche Trail has not been rebuilt in at least the past 22 years; the utilities were installed in 1968. In this time, the street and the utilities below have held up rather well. In 2010 the road was blade patched and seal coated. The project consists of some minor milling to keep drainage intact, along with some minor leveling and a 1 Y2 inch bituminous overlay. There may be bituminous curb installed in some areas to help with drainage. With the low volume of traffic, organized garbage, and spring weight restrictions placed on the road, the overlay seems the correct course of action for this road. I am confident the overlay, with proper maintenance, will be at least a ten year fix. A cost analysis is also discussed and is presented in the Cost Summary section. A detailed cost estimate of the proposed improvements is presented in Appendix A. Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 3 City of Medina — Comanche Trail Overlay Project 2.0 Summary and Recommendations The Overlay of Comanche Trail is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The project is cost effective and necessary to prolong the useful life of the road. The following recommendations are presented for consideration by the Medina City Council: 1) That this report be adopted as the guide for the overlay of Comanche Trail. 2) That the cost of improvements be allocated in accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy throughout the proposed roadway improvement area. 3) That a public hearing be held June 7, 2016, on the proposed improvements. Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 4 City of Medina — Comanche Trail Overlay Project 3.0 Street Improvements In 2009, all roadways in Medina were rated on a scale of 1 to 5 based on their condition (5, indicating excellent condition). Comanche Trail was rated at a 3. The road was crack sealed and seal coated in 2012 to continue its life expectancy. The Comanche Trail Road Project was added to the City's 2016 Capital Improvement Plan. Below is a brief summary of the project. The Comanche Trail Road Project will include application of 730 lineal feet of material and cover 1946 square yards of existing street. The road width is approximately 24 feet wide, with the shoulders consisting mostly of vegetation. This project includes milling where necessary to improve drainage, pre -patching in weak areas, and installing a 1 1/2" bituminous overlay over approximately 1,946 square yards of existing street. See Figure 1 for the typical street section. Cost estimates for the proposed street improvement are presented in Appendix A. Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 5 Figure 1 COMANCHE TRAIL ROAD PROJECT R New Bituminous Wear Course (1 1/2") Remaining Existing Bituminous Ex. Aggregate Base Course R NOTE: • Milling only where necessary for improved drainage and pre - patching in weak areas. • Possible bituminous curb where very flat areas exist to keep drainage working properly. City of Medina — Comanche Trail Overlay Project 4.0 Cost Summary Detailed cost estimates for the proposed improvements are presented in Appendix A. The costs represent estimated construction costs for an overlay project on Comanche Trail, including minimal curb installation in some areas to help with drainage, black dirt and seeding for shoulders, plus an additional 15% allowance for project administration, management, and contingencies. The cost for the work is based on material bids for 2016, recently received by the City of Medina. A summary of the estimated costs is presented in Table 1. TABLE 1 — PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT COST SUMMARY Project Cost Comanche Trail $15,522.00 Total $15,522.00 Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 6 City of Medina — Comanche Trail Overlay Project 5.0 Funding Options 5.1 ASSESSMENTS The City of Medina has an adopted special assessment policy regarding public improvements. Comanche Trail is classified as a Local Rural Street. Following the guidelines of this policy, 50% of the construction costs for the project will be funded through special assessments. Properties which will be assessed for a portion of the project are identified in Appendix B. 5.2 CITY FUNDS The remainder of the project costs not assessed to benefitting properties will be funded with City Street funds. Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 7 City of Medina — Comanche Trail Overlay Project 6.0 Project Schedule The schedule that is shown below provides for completion in October 2016. Council accepts Feasibility May 3, 2016 Call for Public Hearing/Assessment Hearing May 3, 2016 Public Hearing/Assessment Hearing June 7, 2016 Begin Construction July 2016 Final Completion October 2016 The schedule assumes that the public hearing and assessment hearing for the project will be held at a single, regularly -scheduled Council meeting. Note that the construction process should occur over a one week period during a July through October timeframe. Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 8 APPENDIX A Cost Estimate Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 9 2016 Street CIP Cost Estimate for Improvements Comanche Trail Units Amount $/Unit Total 1.5 inches of Bituminous Wear Course SPWEB240(B) TN 160 54.15 $ 8,664 Top Soil and Seeding FT 1460 1.05 $ 1,533 15% Overage for Blacktop Leveling TN 24 54.15 $ 1,300 Miscellaneous Milling $ 2,000 15% Contingency Allowance $ 2,025 Total Estimated Cost $ 15,522 Cost Assumptions: Tack coat cost included in the bituminous wear course unit price. Estimate includes milling only where necessary to improve drainage and pre -patching in weak areas. Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 10 APPENDIX B Assessment and Proposed Improvement Area Map Comanche Trail Overlay Project Page 11 Comanche Trail Street Improvement Project Location and Potential Assessment Area 10 6 ce W H Z HgMt Legend > Project Location Potential Assessment Area Map Date: April 12, 2016 Agenda Item # 8C Member _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-xx RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON COTTONWOOD TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SAME WHEREAS, a feasibility report has been prepared by Steve Scherer as the city's Public Works Director regarding a street improvement project for Cottonwood Trail; and WHEREAS, the project consists of miscellaneous milling, overlay, shouldering, and minimal asphalt curbing for drainage purposes described in the report; and WHEREAS, the project also includes the reconstruct of the easterly 440 feet from County Road 24, per the agreement with a property owner along that section of road; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the project is necessary, cost-effective and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the city of Medina, as follows: 1. The feasibility report is hereby accepted and the project is determined to be necessary, cost-effective and feasible. 2. The project shall be constructed using competitive bids received by the city of Medina. 3. The city council shall consider the making of such improvements in accordance with the feasibility report and assessing benefited properties in accordance with the city's special assessment policy and pursuant to Minn. Stat., Chapter 429. The estimated total cost of the project is as follows: • Cottonwood Trail Overlay Portion $33,438 • Cottonwood Trail (easterly 440 ft. reconstruct) $56,249 4. Public hearings to consider the making of such improvement and the levying of special assessments related thereto shall be held at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers at Medina city hall on the following dates: • Cottonwood Trail June 7, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-xx May 3, 2016 5. City staff is authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for making the project. 6. City staff is directed to prepare the appropriate notices for the improvement hearings and assessment hearings and to cause the proper published and mailed notices to be given for the public hearings as required by law and in accordance with the above schedule. 7. The amount of the project to be specially assessed against benefited properties in accordance with the city's special assessment policy and Minn. Stat. Chapter 429 is as follows: • Cottonwood Trail Overlay $33,438 • Cottonwood Trail (easterly 440 ft. reconstruct) $56,249 8. The city clerk, with the assistance of city staff, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for each such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the area affected without regard to cash valuation and shall file a copy of the proposed assessment in the clerk's office at city hall. Dated: May 3, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-xx 2 May 3, 2016 1VIEDINA Feasibility Report Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project City of Medina Prepared by: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director City of Medina — Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Summary and Recommendations 4 3.0 Street Improvements 5 4.0 Figure 1 — Typical Section — Overlay 5.0 Figure 2 — Typical Section — Reconstruct 6.0 Cost Summary 6 Table 1 — Proposed Improvements Cost Summary 7 7.0 Funding Options 8 8.0 Project Schedule 9 Appendix A — Cost Estimate A-1 Appendix B — Map of Assessment Area and Proposed Improvements B-1 Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 2 City of Medina — Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project 1.0 Introduction City staff has requested this report to determine the feasibility of improvements to Comanche Trail. Even though the history for this road had not been documented, the road has been overlaid at least once since the original construction. In 2012 the road was patched and seal coated. The project consists of some minor milling to keep drainage intact, along with some minor leveling and a 1 Y2 inch bituminous overlay on the westerly portion of the road. There may be some bituminous curbing installed in some areas to help with drainage. The City will work with property owners to correct any drainage problems. With the low volume of traffic, organized garbage, and spring weight restrictions placed on the road, the overlay seems the correct course of action. I am confident the overlay, with proper maintenance, will be a ten year fix for the westerly portion of the road. The easterly 440 feet from County Road 24 past the Leatherdale Farm entrance will be rebuilt. The City reached an agreement with the owners to fund the upgrade in order for them to have access during spring weight restrictions. The cost of the final 11/2 inch lift of asphalt over the entire road will be split according to our assessment policy. A cost analysis is also discussed and is presented in the Cost Summary section. A detailed cost estimate of the proposed improvements is presented in Appendix A. Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 3 City of Medina — Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project 2.0 Summary and Recommendations The Overlay of Cottonwood Trail is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The project is cost effective and necessary to prolong the useful life of the road. The following recommendations are presented for consideration by the Medina City Council: 1) That this report be adopted as the guide for the reconstruct of the base aggregate material, and base bituminous of the easterly 440 linear feet, along with approximately 1600 lineal feet of overlay material for the entire length of Cottonwood Trail. 2) That the cost of improvements be allocated in accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy throughout the proposed roadway improvement area. 3) That a public hearing be held June 7, 2016, on the proposed improvements. Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 4 City of Medina — Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project 3.0 Street Improvements In 2009, all roadways in Medina were rated on a scale of 1 to 5 based on their condition (5, indicating excellent condition). Cottonwood Trail was rated at a 3. The road was patched and seal coated in 2010 to continue its life expectancy. The Cottonwood Trail Road Project was added to the City's 2016 Capital Improvement Plan. Below is a brief summary of the project. The Cottonwood Trail Road Project will include application of 1600 lineal feet of material and cover 4266 square yards of existing street. The road width is approximately 26 feet wide, with the shoulders consisting mostly of vegetation. This project includes milling where necessary to improve drainage, pre -patching in weak areas, leveling, and installing a 1 '/z" bituminous overlay over approximately 4,266 square yards of existing street. See Figure 1 for the typical street section for the overlay. The Cottonwood Trail Road Project will also include the reconstruct of the easterly 440 feet of roadway from County Road 24, per the agreement with a property owner along that section of road. See Figure 2 for typical street section for the reconstruct. Cost estimates for the proposed street improvement are presented in Appendix A. Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 5 Figure 1 COTTONWOOD TRAIL ROAD PROJECT - OVERLAY R New Bituminous Wear Course (1 1/2") Remaining Existing Bituminous Ex. Aggregate Base Course R NOTE: • Milling only where necessary for improved drainage and pre - patching in weak areas. • Possible bituminous curb where very flat areas exist to keep drainage working properly. Figure 2 COTTONWOOD TRAIL ROAD PROJECT - RECONSTRUCT 25' 18' 18' i 12' 12' 1 6" CROWN (0.03% MIN) r2' MIN. T 4:k 4' DITCH BOTTOM 2" - SPWEB340E WEAR COURSE 4"-SPNWB330B BASE COURSE 14"-CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED LIMEROCK, OR RECYCLED AGG. (MNDOT 3138.) SUBGRADE STABILIZATION FABRIC - 8 OZ./SY NON -WOVEN COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE AS CONDITIONS REQUIRE NOTE: • Easterly 440 feet from County Road 24 will be reconstructed according to the above specifications. City of Medina — Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project 4.0 Cost Summary Detailed cost estimates for the proposed improvements are presented in Appendix A. The costs represent estimated construction costs for an overlay project on Cottonwood Trail, including installation of bituminous curb in some areas to help with drainage, black dirt, and seeding for shoulders, plus an additional 15% allowance for project administration, management, and contingencies. The project also includes the reconstruct of the easterly 440 feet of roadway from County Road 24, as per an agreement with the Leatherdale Farms property owners to fund the upgrade to a 9 ton standard in order to gain access during spring weight restrictions. The cost for the work is based on material bids for 2016, recently received by the City of Medina. A summary of the estimated costs is presented in Table 1. TABLE 1— PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT COST SUMMARY Project Cost Cottonwood Trail (Overlay) $33,438.00 Reconstruct Portion $56,249.00 Total $89,687.00 Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 6 City of Medina — Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project 5.0 Funding Options 5.1 ASSESSMENTS The City of Medina has an adopted special assessment policy regarding public improvements. Cottonwood Trail is classified as a Local Rural Street. Following the guidelines of this policy, 50% of the construction costs for the project will be funded through special assessments. Properties which will be assessed for a portion of the project are identified in Appendix B. 5.2 CITY FUNDS The remainder of the project costs not assessed to benefitting properties will be funded with City Street funds. Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 7 City of Medina — Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project 6.0 Project Schedule The schedule that is shown below provides for completion in October 2016. Council accepts Feasibility May 3, 2016 Call for Public Hearing/Assessment Hearing May 3, 2016 Public Hearing/Assessment Hearing June 7, 2016 Begin Construction July 2016 Final Completion October 2016 The schedule assumes that the public hearing and assessment hearing for the project will be held at a single, regularly -scheduled Council meeting. Note that the construction process should occur over a one week period during a July through October timeframe. Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 8 APPENDIX A Cost Estimate Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 9 2016 Street CIP Cost Estimate for Improvements Cottonwood Trail Units Amount $/Unit Total 1.5 inches of Bituminous Wear Course SPWEB240(B) TN 381 54.15 $ 20,631 Top Soil and Seeding FT 3200 1.05 $ 3,360 15% Overage for Blacktop Leveling TN 57 54.15 $ 3,086 Miscellaneous Milling $ 2,000 15% Contingency Allowance $ 4,361 Total Estimated Cost of Overlay Portion $ 33,438 Cost Assumptions: Tack coat cost included in the bituminous wear course unit price. Estimate includes milling only where necessary to improve drainage and pre -patching in weak areas. Cost Estimate for Reconstruct of Easterly 440 feet of Roadway from County Road 24 Common Excavation CY 1015 15.00 $ 15,225 Reclaim SY 1271 .72 $ 915 Mobilization $ 800 Fabric SY 1830 2.00 $ 3,660 Class 5 Recycled Material TN 1475 10.50 $ 15,487 Bituminous Base TN 280 54.15 $ 15,162 Engineering Costs & Contingency Allowance $ 5,000 Total Estimated Cost of Reconstruct $ 56,249 TOTAL OF COMPLETE PROJECT $ 89,687 Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 10 APPENDIX B Assessment and Proposed Improvement Area Map Cottonwood Trail Overlay Project Page 11 Legend Cottonwood Trail Street Improvement Project Location and Potential Assessment Area > Project Location Potential Assessment Area - Cottonwood Map Date: April 12, 2016 Updated: April 19, 2016 Agenda Item # 8D Member _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-xx RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON LAKEVIEW ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SAME WHEREAS, a feasibility report has been prepared by Steve Scherer as the city's Public Works Director regarding a street improvement project for Lakeview Road; and WHEREAS, the project consists of miscellaneous milling, overlay, shouldering, and minimal asphalt curbing for drainage purposes described in the report; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the project is necessary, cost-effective and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the city of Medina, as follows: 1. The feasibility report is hereby accepted and the project is determined to be necessary, cost-effective and feasible. 2. The project shall be constructed using competitive bids received by the City of Medina. 3. The city council shall consider the making of such improvements in accordance with the feasibility report and assessing benefited properties in accordance with the city's special assessment policy and pursuant to Minn. Stat., Chapter 429. The estimated total cost of the project is as follows: • Lakeview Road $27,665 4. Public hearings to consider the making of such improvement and the levying of special assessments related thereto shall be held at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers at Medina city hall on the following dates: • Lakeview Road June 7, 2016 5. City staff is authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for making the project. Resolution No. 2016-xx May 3, 2016 6. City staff is directed to prepare the appropriate notices for the improvement hearings and assessment hearings and to cause the proper published and mailed notices to be given for the public hearings as required by law and in accordance with the above schedule. 7. The amount of the project to be specially assessed against benefited properties in accordance with the city's special assessment policy and Minn. Stat. Chapter 429 is as follows: • Lakeview Road $27,665 8. The city clerk, with the assistance of city staff, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for each such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the area affected without regard to cash valuation and shall file a copy of the proposed assessment in the clerk's office at city hall. Dated: May 3, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-xx 2 May 3, 2016 1VIEDINA Feasibility Report Lakeview Road Overlay Project City of Medina Prepared by: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director City of Medina — Lakeview Road Overlay Project Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Summary and Recommendations 4 3.0 Street Improvements 5 4.0 Figure 1 — Typical Section — Overlay 5.0 Cost Summary 6 Table 1 — Proposed Improvements Cost Summary 7 6.0 Funding Options 8 7.0 Project Schedule 9 Appendix A — Cost Estimate A-1 Appendix B — Map of Assessment Area and Proposed Improvements B-1 Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 2 City of Medina — Lakeview Road Overlay Project 1.0 Introduction City staff has requested this report to determine the feasibility of improvements to Lakeview Road. Some of the recent history concerning Lakeview Road is as follows: In 1987 Lakeview Road was rebuilt along with the Holy Name Drive Project. The road was patched and seal coated in 2010. It is feasible to overlay this road to preserve what remains of the road base below. The project consists of some minor milling to keep drainage intact, along with some minor leveling and a 11/2 inch bituminous overlay. There may be bituminous curbs installed in some areas to help with drainage. With the low volume of traffic, organized garbage, and spring weight restrictions placed on the road, the overlay seems the correct course of action for this road. I am confident the overlay, with proper maintenance, will be a ten year fix. A cost analysis is also discussed and is presented in the Cost Summary section. A detailed cost estimate of the proposed improvements is presented in Appendix A. Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 3 City of Medina — Lakeview Road Overlay Project 2.0 Summary and Recommendations The Overlay of Lakeview Road is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The project is cost effective and necessary to prolong the useful life of the road. The following recommendations are presented for consideration by the Medina City Council: 1) That this report be adopted as the guide for the overlay of Lakeview Road. 2) That the cost of improvements be allocated in accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy throughout the proposed roadway improvement area. 3) That a public hearing be held June 7, 2016, on the proposed improvements. Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 4 City of Medina — Lakeview Road Overlay Project 3.0 Street Improvements In 2009, all roadways in Medina were rated on a scale of 1 to 5 based on their condition (5, indicating excellent condition). Lakeview Road was rated at a 3. The road was seal coated in 2010 to continue its life expectancy. The Lakeview Road Overlay Project was added to the City's 2016 Capital Improvement Plan. Below is a brief summary of the project. The Lakeview Road Overlay Project will include application of 1350 lineal feet of material and cover 3,750 Sq. yards of existing street. The road width is approximately 25 feet wide, with the shoulders consisting of vegetation. This project includes milling where necessary to improve drainage, pre -patching in weak areas, installing a 1 1/2" bituminous overlay over approximately 3,750 square yards of existing street. See Figure 1 for the typical street section. Cost estimates for the proposed street improvement are presented in Appendix A. Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 5 Figure 1 LAKEVI EW ROAD ROAD PROJECT R New Bituminous Wear Course (1 1/2") Remaining Existing Bituminous Ex. Aggregate Base Course R NOTE: • Milling only where necessary for improved drainage and pre - patching in weak areas. • Possible bituminous curb where very flat areas exist to keep drainage working properly. City of Medina — Lakeview Road Overlay Project 4.0 Cost Summary Detailed cost estimates for the proposed improvements are presented in Appendix A. The costs represent estimated construction costs for an overlay project on Lakeview Road, including installation of bituminous curbs in some areas to help with drainage, black dirt, and seeding for shoulders, plus an additional 15% allowance for project administration, management, and contingencies. The cost for the work is based on material bids for 2016, recently received by the City of Medina. A summary of the estimated costs is presented in Table 1. TABLE 1 — PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT COST SUMMARY Project Cost Lakeview Road $27,665.00 Total $27,665.00 Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 6 City of Medina — Lakeview Road Overlay Project 5.0 Funding Options 5.1 ASSESSMENTS The City of Medina has an adopted special assessment policy regarding public improvements. Lakeview Road is classified as a Local Rural Street. Following the guidelines of this policy, 50% of the construction costs for the project will be funded through special assessments. Properties which will be assessed for a portion of the project are identified in Appendix B. 5.2 CITY FUNDS The remainder of the project costs not assessed to benefitting properties will be funded with City Street funds. Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 7 City of Medina — Lakeview Road Overlay Project 6.0 Project Schedule The schedule that is shown below provides for completion in October 2016. Council accepts Feasibility May 3, 2016 Call for Public Hearing/Assessment Hearing May 3, 2016 Public Hearing/Assessment Hearing June 7, 2016 Begin Construction July 2016 Final Completion October 2016 The schedule assumes that the public hearing and assessment hearing for the project will be held at a single, regularly -scheduled Council meeting. Note that the construction process should occur over a one week period during a July through October timeframe. Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 8 APPENDIX A Cost Estimate Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 9 2016 Street CIP Cost Estimate for Improvements Lakeview Road Units Amount $/Unit Total 1.5 inches of Bituminous Wear Course SPWEB240(B) TN 309 54.15 $ 16,732 Top Soil and Seeding FT 2700 1.05 $ 2,835 15% Overage for Blacktop Leveling TN 46 54.15 $ 2,490 Miscellaneous Milling $ 2,000 15% Contingency Allowance $ 3,608 Total Estimated Cost $ 27,665 Cost Assumptions: Tack coat cost included in the bituminous wear course unit price. Estimate includes milling only where necessary to improve drainage and pre -patching in weak areas. Culverts will be replaced at City expense if necessary. Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 10 APPENDIX B Assessment and Proposed Improvement Area Map Lakeview Road Overlay Project Page 11 Legend Lakeview Road Street Improvement Project Location and Potential Assessment Area > Project Location Potential Assessment Area Map Date: April 12, 2016 Agenda Item # 8E MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Debra Peterson, Associate Planner; through City Administrator Johnson DATE: April 28, 2016 MEETING: May 3, 2016 City Council SUBJ: Clydesdale Market Place, LLC — PUD Amendment for Larger Sign — 345 Clydesdale Trail Review Deadline Complete Application Received: March 16, 2016 120 Day Extension Date: July 14, 2016 Overview of Request Clydesdale Market Place, LLC has requested a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to construct a freestanding sign 317.6 square feet in area and 29'.2" in height at the NE corner of 55/Clydesdale Trail (Outlot B, Medina Clydesdale Market Place). The freestanding sign is proposed to be closer to State Highway 55 than the existing sign located on the Goddard School lot along retaining wall (proposed to be removed). The proposed sign location meets setback requirements. The subject property is zoned PUD along with the properties to the north, east and west. The properties south of Hwy 55 are zoned Commercial Highway -Railroad. The property is shown below: Clydesdale Market Place, LLC Page 1 of 6 PUD Amendment for Larger Freestanding Sign May 3, 2016 City Council Meeting Planned Unit Developments PUD provisions are established to provide comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing for a mixture of uses. PUD Summary The property is currently zoned PUD and in order to make modifications from the PUD, an Amendment is required. Under the PUD, the Commission and Council have the ability to approve a larger sign than what is otherwise allowed by Code or previous PUD. The original PUD approved an Overall Master Signage Plan for the area, which is attached for review. Within that, it approved two freestanding signs, a Monument Sign and an Identify Tower with specifications shown below: Identity Tower: 120 Square feet in sign area (one side) and 18 Feet in Height located just east of Verizon/Caribou Monument Sign: 86.7 Square feet in sign area (one side) and 10 Feet in Height located along retaining wall just west of the Goddard School Allocation: Restriction of 21.75 Square feet per tenant Tenant Spaces: Only four tenants are allowed to be advertised on monument sign The PUD consists of six lots with multiple tenants/occupants. The lots have the following occupants: 1. Target 2. OfficeMax 3. Great Clips 4. 9Round 5. Dover Saddlery 6. Jenson's Liquor 7. Dental Office 8. Vacant Tenant Space 9. Wells Fargo 10. The Goddard School (under construction) 11. Verizon Wireless 12. Caribou Coffee 13. Kala Lilly Clydesdale Market Place, LLC Page 2 of 6 May 3, 2016 PUD Amendment for Larger Freestanding Sign City Council Meeting The Monument Sign to be removed currently has four tenants advertised on the sign (Wells Fargo, Great Clips, 9Round, and OfficeMax). The Overall Master Sign Plan restricts the number and size of each tenant on the sign, but did not say which tenants were allowed on the monument sign. Below are pictures of the monument sign from Clydesdale Trail and a closer picture from the street. Clydesdale Market Place, LLC Page 3 of 6 PUD Amendment for Larger Freestanding Sign May 3, 2016 City Council Meeting The Identify Tower has only two tenants advertised which are Target and OfficeMax and the users to be displayed on the sign were identified on the Overall Master Sign Plan. The picture below is taken from the Target parking lot across Clydesdale Trail. Clydesdale Market Place, LLC Page 4 of 6 May 3, 2016 PUD Amendment for Larger Freestanding Sign City Council Meeting Current Regulations for Freestanding Signs In the Commercial Highway Zoning Districts, the Sign Code allows for one freestanding sign per lot, except a second sign shall be permitted if the lot has frontage on more than one street. The second freestanding sign may not be located along the same street frontage as the first freestanding sign. No freestanding sign shall exceed 80 square feet (one side) or 20 feet in height. Maximum Size: 80 SF - Commercial and Business Districts 87 SF - Existing PUD allows for monument sign Maximum Height: 20 Feet - Commercial and Business Districts 10 Feet — Existing PUD for monument sign Maximum Number: 1 Freestanding Sign per Lot, except a second if fronts more than one street If the current PUD was regulated under the current Sign Regulations, looking at just freestanding signage, the following would be allowed: Target Lot: One sign along Hwy 55 at 80 SF/20 feet in height OfficeMax Lot: One sign along Clydesdale Trail at 80 SF/20 feet in height. This sign would include Great Clips, 9Round, Dover Saddlery, Jensen's Liquor, Dental Office, and a vacant space Wells Fargo: One sign along Clydesdale Trail 80 SF/20 feet in height Goddard School: Two signs, one along Hwy 5 and one along Clydesdale Trail 80 SF each/20 feet in height = 160 SF Verizon/Caribou: Two signs, one along Hwy 5 and one along Clydesdale Trail at 80 SF each/20 feet in height = 160 SF Total No. Signs: 8 (Three along Hwy 55 and five along Clydesdale Trail) Current PUD Allows: 2 along Hwy 55 only Current Regulations Total Along Hwy 55 only: Total Along Clydesdale Trail only: Total SF of Freestanding Signs: 240 SF 400 SF 640 SF of overall development Current PUD Allows: 207 SF Applicant Response to Request to Reduce Size of Sign The applicant submitted a response to staff s request to consider reducing the total square footage and height of the sign during the review process. The applicant stated that they need a larger sign in height and square footage to be able to advertise all of its tenants and to have Clydesdale Market Place, LLC Page 5 of 6 May 3, 2016 PUD Amendment for Larger Freestanding Sign City Council Meeting visibility from State Hwy 55. The existing monument is only visible going east bound on Hwy 55 and only advertises four tenants within the development. Planning Commission Findings The Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the proposed at the April 12 meeting. The Commission generally found the larger monument sign acceptable. Staff had questioned allowing the sign to be 10 feet taller than generally allowed. However, the Planning Commission supported the additional height and size based on the findings below: 1. The Development sits up higher than State Hwy 55, making visibility difficult for multiple retail stores to be seen with just a wall sign. 2. The original PUD restricted the total square footage of the development to be less than what the current City Code allows. The Planning Commission Motion The Planning Commission motioned to approve the monument sign with 317.6 square feet in area, and 29'-2" in height conditioned on the following: 1) The applicant shall change the exterior brushed aluminum material on the sign and replace with a darker finish to match existing signage in the development. 2) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the PUD Amendment. Potential Motion If the Council agrees with the Planning Commission, the following motion would be in order: Move to direct staff to prepare an ordinance granting approval of the PUD Amendment based upon the findings and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Attachments 1. Document List 2. Excerpt from DRAFT 4/12/2016 Planning Commission Minutes 3. Applicant Response to Review Comments (Received 4/6/16 ) 4. Overall Master Signage Plan 5. PUD Purpose 6. Existing Identity Tower (2006 Building Permit Copy) 7. Existing Monument Sign (applicant submitted) 8. Existing Monument Sign (2006 Building Permit Copy) 9. Proposed Monument Sign 10. Site Plan showing Sign Location Clydesdale Market Place, LLC Page 6 of 6 May 3, 2016 PUD Amendment for Larger Freestanding Sign City Council Meeting Project: LR-16-178 — Clydesdale Marketplace Sign PUD Amendt The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 2/5/16 2/1/16 4 yes yes Fee 2/5/16 2/5/16 Yes yes Mailing Labels 3/16/16 3/16/16 6 yes yes Pages include mailing labels Narrative No n/a Plan Set (Sign Elevation) 2/5/16 12/31/15 1 Yes Yes Existing and Proposed Site Survey (existing) 2/5/16 Unknown 1 yes Yes Not real legible Email Response by Eric Olsen 2/26/16 2/26/16 1 Yes Yes Revised Sign/landscape Elevation 3/15/16 3/11/16 1 Yes Yes Revised Survey 3/15/16 3/15/16 1 yes yes Shows proposed setbacks Applicant's Response to Staff comments 4/6/16 No date 6 Yes Yes Identity Tower Picture 4/6/16 No date 1 Yes Yes 2005 Copy from PUD Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Review Comments by Deb Incomplete letter Overall Master Sign Plan Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes 2/23/16 2/26/16 1 1 Yes yes Email 2006 Monument and Identity Tower plans from Building permits 6/20/05 5/8/06 1 2 Yes Yes Original PUD Original Building permit copies Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT April 12, 2016 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing — Clydesdale Market Place, LLC — Amendment to Planned Unit Development Adjacent to 345 Clydesdale Trail to Construct a Larger Replacement Monument Sign Closer to Highway 55 Finke presented a request to amend the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Clydesdale Market Place in regard to the signage, specifically to increase the size of the monument sign at the southwest corner of the development. He stated that the proposed sign would be a 30-foot tall sign with over 300 square feet in total size. He noted that the current sign is 87 square feet in size. He stated that within the PUD two monument signs were approved for the site and provided a photograph of the other approved sign which has a size of 120 square feet. He noted that was the extent of signage allowed for the development. He explained that the applicant is asking for the larger sign in order to provide additional visibility for the tenants which are not listed on the current monument signs and do not have visible signage from the roadway. He stated that there are 13 different occupants to the development and only 4 have wall signage which is visible from the roadway. He noted that the terms of signage specified in the PUD is more restrictive than what would be allowed for the development otherwise, as each tenant could have an 80 square foot sign. He stated that this is a narrow amendment for the overall PUD. He stated that the staff report states that staff generally supports an increase in signage and concurs that the number of businesses is not supported by the current amount of signage. He noted that the question would be the amount of increase, noting that the maximum sign regulation allows for a 20-foot high sign and this request is for 30 feet. He stated that the panels requested are 31 inches tall and could be reduced in size to accommodate all the tenants within the maximum height limit. He stated that a reasonable amount of signage for this development would be three signs of 80 square feet for a total of 240 square feet. He stated that there are benefits to a coordinated commercial development such as this through PUD, as scattered development would have much more signage. He stated that perhaps this sign be allowed as a size of 20 feet by 12 feet, which when combined with the other sign would provide a total of 360 square feet of signage along Highway 55. Foote asked if there is any sign similar to the proposed height of 30 feet outside of Medina in surrounding communities. Finke stated that Lowes in Plymouth is about 30 to 35 feet while CVS is approximately 27 feet. He confirmed that all the signs in Medina are capped at 20 feet with the exception of the Medina ballroom which has a variance because of the grade, noting that the sign from highway grade does not exceed 20 feet. Albers asked at what point drivers would start to see the sign if it is allowed at 30 feet. Finke stated that the only item that would be visible at 30 feet would be the Target tenant. Muffin asked if the other sign could be made to be the taller sign since that sign already sits up higher. Finke stated that the applicant could speak to that more, but noted that sign would not be as visible to the eastbound traffic. Albers referenced the property south of Wells Fargo that was approved as an Indian restaurant. Finke stated that property has not been withdrawn. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT April 12, 2016 Meeting Minutes Eric Olson, representing the applicant, provided pictures of the Lowes sign in Plymouth to provide a reference. He stated that when he started a few of the smaller, locally owned tenants commented that the largest marketing effort they have to bring in customers is signage which is how this process arose. He stated that the goal is to provide signage for the smaller locally owned tenants. He explained that the proposed size of the signage is meant to help increase visibility for drivers from the roadway. He stated that there is also a challenge for the site with being up on the hill and the current sign has zero visibility from the west. He stated that the current monument sign is only visible from traffic moving in one direction and does not have visibility for the other direction until drivers are past the sign. He stated that the liquor store tenant was going to attend, but runs the store himself and was unable to get away, noting that the liquor store tenant stated that he does get business from the smaller real estate type signs he places. Finke stated why Target occupies 30 percent of the sign if the driver of this request is the other tenants. Olson explained that the site is governed not only by the PUD, but also through an Operational Easement Agreement (OEA) which Target sets up when they build a site. He explained that the request would not only need to be approved by the City, but also by the members of the OEA; and Target would not approve the request without their inclusion. He noted that when the sign was originally proposed, it was smaller and Target had their own requirements in order to approve the request. Foote asked if this would be approved by Target. Olson stated that conceptually the sign has been approved, but would go back to Target for final approval. It was confirmed that Target would then have their name on two signs. He provided additional details on the requirements from Target regarding signage. V. Reid asked if the applicant would be in agreement with a 20-foot sign. Olson replied that this proposed size would be the smallest that they would like to go. V. Reid referenced a nearby sign that lists multiple tenants off County Road 101 that is smaller. She stated that it is rare to allow signage closer to the highway rather than closer to the buildings and was concerned with site pollution. Olson appreciated V. Reid's concern and noted that they would match the material of the sign to the nearby retaining wall. He confirmed that the existing sign would be removed. He did not believe the new sign would be taller than the top of the Caribou Coffee building. He stated that the current panels for the sign are 21.75 feet, while the new panels are proposed to be 31 feet. Murrin asked how tall and wide the current panels are compared to the new panels. Olson replied, providing the current panel and proposed panel dimensions. Murrin asked if the applicant considered making the other existing sign taller. R. Reid replied that sign is not visible from both directions of traffic. Olson replied that the other sign is currently 20 or 21 feet high and did not consider that location because that is more of the Target sign. He noted that they would consider that if the same goals 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT April 12, 2016 Meeting Minutes could be met and if Target would agree to that, but explained that their lot ends before that Target sign. Murrin asked if the 30-foot sign would be higher than the Target sign, noting that she realizes that the grade is different. Olson stated that he believed that the sign would be lower than the Target sign because of the change in topography. Barry asked how the brushed aluminum finishing was chosen as compared to the brushed rock, which fits in with the surroundings. Olson confirmed that the finish could be modified to better fit in with the surroundings as the brushed aluminum was just chosen as the sign was modeled from a sign at another property they own. Drew Palmer, Wells Fargo Corporate Real Estate Group, stated that he is here in support of the sign request. He stated that Wells Fargo loves this community and would like to have increased visibility to service their customers. He noted that the business currently has a problem with signage issues as customers are not finding this location and therefore going to the Plymouth or even Buffalo locations. He believed that this would be a great opportunity for this location to thrive and alert customers to this location. V. Reid opened the public hearing at 9:21 p.m. No additional comments. V. Reid closed the public hearing at 9:21 p.m. Barry stated that he supports this proposed height, noting that the intent for this corridor is to support business and he would like to see the smaller businesses supported with increased visibility. He noted that his only comment would be for the aesthetic of the sign to blend into the surrounding aesthetics. Foote echoed the comments of Barry in regard to the aesthetics and noted that he would support the 30 foot height, as he believed 20 feet would be too small. R. Reid stated that this is a unique situation because the stores are up so high and are not visible from the roadway when driving by and therefore supported the 30 foot height for the sign. Albers stated that he would support 30 feet, as it is important for both westbound and eastbound drivers to have visibility in time to make the turn into the development. Murrin stated that she would be in favor of increased signage for the businesses in that area in order to help those businesses grow and be successful. She asked if the sign would be perpendicular to Highway 55 and would be lit from both sides. Olson confirmed that the sign would be perpendicular to the roadway and would be lit to increase visibility. Murrin asked if the 30 feet would be high enough to alert drivers, noting that she would support the sign as proposed. 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT April 12, 2016 Meeting Minutes White stated that she would also support this request, as this sign would be an improvement from the existing sign. She asked how this signage was a part of the original PUD and if there is background that should be considered. Finke stated that the applicant did request larger signage, but the City did not approve the request at that time. V. Reid stated that she believes that the sign is too big and that 20 feet would be sufficient. She believed that all the tenants should be able to list their names, but believed that this would be giving Target too much visibility. She did not want Medina to become Plymouth and noted that she will vote against the request. Motion by Murrin, seconded by Foote, to recommend approval of the PUD Amendment based upon the findings noted in the staff report and subject to conditions recommended by staff, with the additional condition that the brushed aluminum be changed to match the nearby fence. Motion approved 6-1 (V. Reid opposed). 4 1. What tenants are proposed for the proposed monument sign? When the PUD signage was approved the "monument sign" was for four tenant spaces at 21.75 square feet each. The reason why we are applying for a new larger sign is so that current tenants have visibility and motorists have better idea of what is available at the shopping center. The proposed sign has Target and 7 additional spots. We currently have Wells Fargo, Great Clips, Office Max and 9 Round on the sign. That leaves 3 remaining spots; we have requests from 2 existing tenants to be put on the monument sign, leaving one remaining spot. We want to leave the additional remaining sign for the North Outlot because it's hard to see from Highway 55. According to our tenant, in their attached letter, their most successful driver of customer traffic is when they put temporary signage along Highway 55 and they really want an opportunity to have a permanent sign. It's very important for all of our local businesses' success they have proper signage to stay successful. 2. Would you consider a shorter sign, not to exceed 20 feet in height? If not, please explain why. The PUD only allowed this monument sign to have a maximum height of 10 feet and your submittal is proposing just under 30 feet. The Sign Ordinance/City Code would allow if not under a PUD 20 feet, which staff would support the 20 foot height. The reason for the larger sign is about visibly. The current sign is 10 ft high, on top of a 10 ft retaining wall and it's hard to see from a reasonable distance when east. The sign cannot be seen by a motorist traveling West until after they have past the intersection. As shown in the chart below provided by our sign company 24" to 30" letters are best viewed at somewhere between 240 and 300 feet: LETTER VIS Blur( lG HART Letter Helgbt ,3" 4` 6` g` 10- 12 15- 15- 24" 00- 36" 42' 54 60- Best Impact Distance 307 40` 60" 807 00- 10 " 120" 150' 180' 40" 0' 420" 480' 540' 500' Maximum Readable Distance 100" 150` 200' 350" 400" 450` 525" 530' 750- 1000" 1 250" 1560" 1750" 2000" 22'S0' 2500" I have done overhead measurements along Highway 55 to show how close a motorist would have to be to have the best impact visibility. Heading east, it's at the far end of the Medina Entertainment Center parking lot, heading west it's in line with the eastern end of the Caribou store. Heading East: JOYS Marketing isSales., InFci f Hamel Fed Heading West: 40 *', le ' IA it it! it di t a e0T4404aled fail, �Narrpi,ll Rd Total distance: 343.33 ft 02.46 m) M,1r. Inn ainmenlCenterrr , r Standing view from ment Lot 3. The PUD for this monument sign was only approved for 87 square feet in area. The Sign Ordinance/City Code has a maximum square footage of 80 square feet and your application proposes 317.6 square feet. Please explain the reason that there is a need for such an increase in square footage. The reasoning is the same as the request for a variance in height; it is for visibility from Highway 55. The size and height of the sign is a way to accommodate our current tenant's needs for signage in order to stay successful as businesses of the community. If we lower the size/high/square footage the sign, it would not be as easily visible or we would have to remove the tenants from the sign, shrinking it down to the size and style we already have. I also included a picture of the larger Target sign (120 sq ft) and it is hard to see from about 450 ft away: Great elimey�dcesdale a'Isratp`ace ler - Total distance: 452.87 ft (138.04 m) Imagery EQ016 Geogle, Map data C2016 Google Terms Privacy Send feedback 10R Et View of Sign from 450 ft Street Sig JENSEN'S BEER, WINE & SPIRITS 314 CLYDESDALE TRL, MEDINA MN. 55340 JE.NSEN'S. BEER 'WINE SPIRIT Thage Jbstlfcato Prepared for: Eric Olsen, CMP, CCIM (Wellington Management, Inc.) Prepared by: David Jensen, President (Jensen & Sons, Inc.) March 25, 2016 Objective Gain approval from the City of Medina, MN. for new/additional display space on Hwy. 55 & Clydesdale Trail for JENSEN'S BEER, WINE & SPIRITS and other Clydesdale Market Tenets. Justification Highway 55 street signage may be the most important ingredient for my businesses long term success and growth. Businesses of all types and sizes especially small independent ones such as ours exist in a highly competitive environment; for JENSEN'S BEER, WINE & SPIRITS to succeed we must be able to quickly communicate the immediate message to prospective customers traveling on Hwy. 55 that we exist and what type of products we offer in a few words or less; turn here for BEER, WINE & SPIRITS. Thank you for the opportunity to present the importance and need for additional and strategically placed signage for JENSEN'S BEER, WINE & SPIRITS and other tenets. Please do not hesitate to reach out to us if you have any questions or comments, we would love to talk to you. Sincerely, David & Nicole Jensen Mobile:763-688-0798 (Private) March 25, 2016 MEDINA SIGNAGE :COMPARING RYAN'S PROPOSAL TO CITY PUD 6-9-05 Update: Monday, June 20, 2005 TARGET SIGNAGE OKAY IDENTITY TOWER RYAN / MEDINA STAFF TOTAL SIGNAGE SQUARE FEET SIGNAGE SQ.FT. PER SIDE TOTAL HEIGHT/ FT. TARGET BULLSEYE / SQ.FT. % JR. BOX / SQ. FT. 240 S.F. 120 S.F. 18 FT. 80% 20% MONUMENT SIGN RYAN / MEDINA STAFF SIGNAGE SQ.FT. PER SIDE SIGNS ALLOWED EQUAL SIGNAGE DISTRIBUTION TOTAL HEIGHT/ FT. JUNIOR BOX TOTAL SIGNAGE SQUARE FEET IN -LINE RETAIL 20' BAY STORE FRONT ( 440 SQ.F TOTAL SIGNAGE SQ.FT. PERCENT BUILDING FRONTAGE 40' BAY STORE FRONT ( 880 SQ.FT TOTAL SIGNAGE SQ.FT. PERCENT BUILDING FRONTAGE T. BUILDING FRONTAGE) . BUILDING FRONTAGE) 87 S.F. 4 21.75 TOTAL S.F. 10 FT RYAN / MEDINA STAFF 250 S.F. RYAN / MEDINA STAFF 44 SQ.FT. 10% 88 SQ.FT. 10% OUTLOTS RYAN / MEDINA STAFF Signs shall only be placed on the building facades • one per elevation • 3 signs max (any type) • 6% of building frontage in square feet • Individual outlot tenants will discuss with staff their signage plan as they apply for building permit 6/21 /2005 1 Revised Sign Matrix Medina City Code 827. Zoning — Zoning Districts PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD) Section 827.25. PUD - Planned Unit Development Regulations - Purpose. PUD - Planned Unit Development provisions are established to provide comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is intended to encourage: Subd.1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. Subd. 2. Higher standards of site and building design. Subd. 3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. Subd. 4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low -impact development practices which result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of the City. Subd. 5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses. Subd. 6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and service facilities. Subd. 7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower development costs and public investments. Subd. 8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) Subd. 9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. Section 827.27. Requirements, Conditions and Standards for Approving a PUD. Subd. 1. General Standards. (a) Rezoning Required. Approval of a PUD under this Section shall require the subject property to be rezoned from its existing designation to a PUD. (b) Review of Application. In its review of any application under this Section, the City Council shall consider comments on the application of those persons appearing 827. Zoning — Zoning Districts Page 12 of 36 IDENTITY TOWER SIGN 120SOUARE FOOTAGE OF SIGNAGE This drawing is the property of: •cc m M a W Z 4m V d- 267" OVERALL 60" 34" 12" 60" ELEVATION: 171" OPENING FOR CABINET 60" 12" 34" 60" EXTERIOR D/F ILLUMINATED CABINET FOR MONUMENT OCABINET FABRICATED ALUMINUM CABINET W/ PAINTED BENJAMIN MOORE #HC-47 BROOKLINE BEIGE FACES .177" WHITE LEXAN W/ TRANSLUCENT VINYL GRAPHICS LEL/ REVEALS 3" X 2" X 1/8" ALUMINUM CHANNEL PAINN�T BEENJAMIN MOORE #HC-47 J EC RTC RT ICACREQUIREMENTS: 12-72" CWHO LAMPS 2-668DR BALLASTS 8.1 AMPS @120 VOLTS FINAL SUPPLY & CONNECTION BY OTHERS 7�C SURVEY REQUIREMENTS: ELECTRICAL LOCATION INSTALL: MOUNT TO STONE PIERS BY OTHERS SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" ADDED PAINT COLOR SPECS ADDED REVEAL DETAIL Nordquist Nordquist Sign Company, Inc. 312 West Lake Street Minneapolis, MN 55408 PH 612.823.7291 FX 612.824.6211 www.nordquistsign.com All design, manufacturing, reproduction, use and sale of this document is strictly prohibitied without the written consent of Nordquist Sign Company, Inc. This document is submitted under a confidential understanding that the recipient of this document assumes custody and agrees that the document and any part of its content is not to be copied, reproduced in whole or part, or any of its contents be revealed in whole or part to other parties except for which it is agreed upon by Nordquist Sign Company, Inc. and recipient, nor shall any design features unique to this document be incorporated in any other projects. QUOTE: 22660 PREV. DWG: NOT APPLICABLE SALES: SH DESIGN: HM DATE: 02.07.06 REV 1: 04.24.06 HM REV 2: 04.26.06 B1 REV 3: REV 4: REV 5: CITY OF MEDINA RYAN SIGN TYPE: D/F ILLUMINATED MONUMENT APPROVAL. REF: CITY OF MEDINA DWG: 06-035 PAGE: 2.1 MEDINA, MN SQUARE FOOTAGE: 317.6 12'-0" a 0 N T N M CD LrY M TARGET ADDED CIRCULAR TOP CABINET TO ACCOMMODATE TARGET LOGO TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT 19'-10" O DOUBLE FACE ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SIDE VIEW ESCRIPTION A TENANT CABINET - ALUMINUM CABINET NSTRU T1DN - 2" RETAINERS & DIVIDER BAR ,, - PAINTED P1 }-TENANT PANELS - (8 / SIDE) FLAT WHITE LEXAN PANELS - DECORATED WITH VINYL GRAPHICS - GRAPHICS TBD 1-BASE - RIVER ROCK STONE BASE P1 LANDSCAPE MULCH / ROCK FINISH SCHEDULE BRUSHED ALUMINUM NOTE: SIGN N.T.E. 2000 LUMENS SIGN CABINET & BASE © LANDSCAPE PLAN - BY OTHERS SPIREA SCALE: NTS Lawrence ign www.lawrencesign.com 945 Pierce Butler Route, St. Paul, MN 55104 651.488.6711 • 800.998.8901 CLIENT: CLYDESDALE MARKET PLACE MEDINA, MN SIGN TYPE: D/F ILLUMINATED MONUMENT CUSTOMER APPROVAL NAME. DATE. REV 1: 02.16.15 RR REV 2: 07.15.15 JJ REV 3: 09.24.15 JJ REV 4: 12.30.15 Jl REV 5: 12.31.15 RR REV6: 03.11.1611 SALES: DP PR: DESIGN: JJ DATE: 01.26.15 DWG: 7789-01 These plans are the exclusive property of Walker Sign Holdings Inc. dba Lawrence Sign and are the result of the original work of its employees. They are submitted to your company for the sole purpose of your consideration of whether to purchase these plans or to purchase from Walker Sign Holdings Inc. dba Lawrence Sign A sign manufactured according to these plans, distribution or exhibition of these plans to anyone other than employees of your company, or use of these plans to construct a sign similar to the one embodied herein, is expressly prohibited and will render the user liable for damages. Copyright 2015 © Walker Sign Holdings Inc. All rights reserved. UL ELECTRIC LISTEDSIGN PAGE: 1.1 MEDINA, MN 1 Ji I!d ;i°1SN ~r 1� r"x� 1 n'�-rr'°44 1pa{ I 1'4.9d° i 10'-0" SET BACK FROM PROPERTY LINE { donors faun. Ga.m rnon mama-..ne n (4n0reg y:.r rrmm.mrvnl i 5400rea Quad frtw Mcnumrn! A MCs-a or ACtriS TO M,141 r CCaAarr 4l MaYalf Mir% niAo lff K.4 ) 50 0 50 T00 150 SCrJJb w 1,085°f8'P8'rV i'el.ev a r 59J°rVr08 I I yl. ,Dv :.rangy 2 tflhYy II aumme+mr Amer 4itiiHa kMCSPALF au4x'rrALALZ ratTrZa75410. �i 4f Fdb.2.2 e 4•f0.e5$'! G-ri, f t" f'C.WO -Cane s4 {,rani-. 54. 75 - 1085°r r `,22'+v 98, Go w8°.r le 'jt/ 4rrF 0-00TPier°, 1 ra Wk ADALE IRA Ali 41/4,4 n°"+-cv r of, rwa rr&nr� t '� a r t P. r /'3�,.' re,yy r • Ss .v790 05 v 6.3 '6 3105, I*• a ,,i �i7 tr Oki frifiTF'fs'ar am-eroo La Ft 2 /BAR E1 NO • - 794.2� al,� 97 ' uPLLAIrr.ay , R14 PrrwGr; ralaT l:okrAtJWa:roe. r, rr • ,p.'-S•. • �2,3 5{1 i � �75usf�ST. °37 4i * '6I°� If 508 °II 45 "W —�`• — --�sr j ek, aar rrr^.r +Fug rar�yy Aav M,. 28$,iy j Lawrence ign www.lawrencesign.com 945 Pierce Butler Route, St. Paul, MN 55104 651.488.6711 • 800.998.8901 CLIENT: CLYDESDALE MARKET PLACE MEDINA, MN SIGN TYPE: D/F ILLUMINATED MONUMENT CUSTOMER APPROVAL NAME. DATE. REV 1: 02.16.15 RR REV2: 07.15.1511 REV 3: 09.24.15 JJ REV 4: 12.30.15 Jl REV 5: 12.31.15 RR REV 6: 03.15.16 Jl SALES: DP PR: DESIGN: JJ DATE: 01.26.15 DWG: 7789-01 These plans are the exclusive property of Walker Sign Holdings Inc. dba Lawrence Sign and are the result of the original work of its employees. They are submitted to your company for the sole purpose of your consideration of whether to purchase these plans or to purchase from Walker Sign Holdings Inc. dba Lawrence Sign A sign manufactured according to these plans, distribution or exhibition of these plans to anyone other than employees of your company, or use of these plans to construct a sign similar to the one embodied herein, is expressly prohibited and will render the user liable for damages. Copyright 2015 © Walker Sign Holdings Inc. All rights reserved. 0 ELECTRIC LISTEDSIGN O SITE PLAN / SIGN PLACEMENT PAGE: 1.2 Agenda Item # 9A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: April 28, 2016 MEETING: May 3, 2016 City Council SUBJ: Proposed 2016 Mediacom Buildout Background The Franchise agreement between Mediacom and the City of Medina requires Mediacom to construct 8 miles of cable system during 2016 and allows for construction of an additional 10 miles to which the City would contribute $12,000 per mile. The Franchise allows for an additional 8 shared miles (City contributing $12,000 per mile) in 2017. Telecom providers serving the City have received federal funding to support expansion of broadband to almost all areas of the City. Unfortunately, the companies have up to 7 years to complete construction. Staff has inquired a number of times when the companies intend to expand in Medina but the companies have declined to provide schedules. The City Council reviewed Mediacom's proposed 2016 construction at the March 15 worksession. At that time, the proposed construction was not consistent with the Franchise because it proposed 7.25 miles of Mediacom-funded construction and 11.25 shared miles. The City Council also questioned the location of some of the proposed construction. It appeared that there were other locations which could serve more households with a similar investment. Mediacom's originally proposed construction would provide potential access to 111 homes. The City Council also expressed concern that almost none of Mediacom's funded construction was located along Streets as defined within the Franchise. Almost all of the construction served individual homes which staff believes should be considered Drops under the Franchise. Staff does not believe the language in the Franchise supports this construction being counted towards the required System Extension. The Council has discussed this discrepancy a number of times. These discussions led Mediacom to propose an additional 3 miles of construction during an amendment to the Franchise in 2015. Updated Construction Plan Staff discussed these concerns with Mediacom, who submitted the attached proposal. The new proposal adjusted the mileage so that Mediacom would fund over 8 miles and the shared miles would be less than 10. However, the proposal did not adjust proposed construction location and seemed to not be the most cost-effective plan. Staff again discussed the option to relocate some of the construction with Mediacom. Bill Jensen, regional Vice President, indicated that they would be open to shifting mileage as 2016 Mediacom Buildout Page 1 of 2 May 3, 2016 City Council Meeting suggested by staff. He noted, however, that doing so would require a permit from CP Rail which will likely slow construction this year. Of Mediacom's 8 miles, approximately 1.44 miles are along Streets and an additional 0.77 miles could potentially be in easements which serve more than one home. The remaining 5.79 miles serve a single home and appear to be Drops. In fact, approximately 1 mile of this construction consists of Drops less than 500 feet of length, which are considered a Standard Installation under the Franchise and are to be provided at Mediacom's full expense. The updated construction plan would serve approximately 140 homes. The cost to the City for the proposed shared mileage would be $120,000. The City Council has discussed funding such construction from Franchise Fees paid by existing cable users. Such funding could otherwise support other City services. Medina currently has $72,000 in franchise fees. We receive just over $10,000 per quarter based on current subscribers to Mediacom. Potential Council Action Staff seeks Council direction on the proposed cost -share construction for 2016. If the City Council approves the proposed construction, the following motion would be in order: Move to approve construction of cost -shared Cable System Extension as shown on map dated 4/28/2016 and authorize payment of up to $120,000 as described in the Franchise Agreement. Attachments 1. Proposed 2016 Mediacom Buildout 2. Map identifying potential alternative shared construction 2016 Mediacom Buildout Page 2 of 2 May 3, 2016 City Council Meeting w z COUNTY ROAD 11 MAPLE Independence YCAMUK4 14/4 RUCEy,41T� e I '' • ' c CHIFIPEIWA p00o00 i Ct w o >- O CO L_ Half Moon Katrina o� Peter CHESTN• UT HACKAMORE m 0 1 A �9I � C bN,6V6NECL WOODS �f edin:�0 "T+/C o� NAVAJ O _ •• _ o CONTY ROAD 24 c ool j • ' I • • • i o • - • O`Y g • • SH • it aRG* • o HtI / • • �00-- a -- -- i - ^ U • o_ < ANDER Spurzem d O 1 • • J • •l • Oi \I • --1-1• • • • • • L_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- 1 O i O 1 p 0 bEERHI� = � j ' o ---i j BOBOLINK • • ' M•- . -0 di,• • Q Z <• Q• olsfe • H • DEERHILIL O O O CHEROKEE 0l0 O O C E RGRE N RRyN CL i! CHEYENNE l Holy Name ME0`. U O m 0 m LE P Mediacom Proposed 2016 Construction March 29, 2016 Legend <all other values> Proposed Construction Mediacom Shared 0 Homes/Businesses 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles N Map Date: April 22, 2016 w z o0 CHIPPEWA Spurzem Half Moon Acad COUNTY ROAD 11 MAPLE Independence YCAMORtf. nname RUCEy2�T� I L_ Katrina Unnamed a HAMEL COUNTY ROAD 24 Unnamed HESTNUT • • • HOt\--s( g SH • • — • iI qiiRG� • • �®' • / • � o J BOBOLINK UnnameKEL 0 � o • • OX a • • Ci <• ar • LACKFOOT • ••\ TY ROAD �} HACKAMORE m 0 1 A �9I � C gti,6Vaivget WOODS �f edin:�0 ANDER NAVAJ O 0 I 0` 0 0 0 Y QI • 0 CC • 0 O ® '0 • z DEERHIL1L • OD COUI olsfe O O O 0 (0 O 0 m— o w 2 Q CHEYENNE z J O 0 m LE E RGRE N RRyN CL i! Holy Name w �- I C D Mooney Mediacom Discussion 2016 Construction Potential Alternative Construction Legend <all other values> Potential Cost -Share Construction Shared 0 Homes/Businesses 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles N Map Date: April 28, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: April 28, 2016 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates May 3, 2016 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) Clydesdale Marketplace Sign PUD Amendment — northeast corner of Highway 55 and Clydesdale Trail. Clydesdale Marketplace LLC has requested an amendment to the Medina Clydesdale Marketplace PUD in order to allow construction of a monument sign at the northeast corner of Highway 55 and Clydesdale Trail. This sign would replace the sign on top of the large retaining wall and provide additional space for more tenants. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on April 12 and unanimously recommended approval of the request. Staff intends to present to the Council on May 3. B) Wealshire LLC Comp Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Site Plan Review — Wealshire, LLC has requested a site plan review for construction of a 173,000 sf memory care facility. The request also includes a rezoning from RR-UR to Business Park and an Interim Use Permit to permit continued agricultural use of the portion of the property not proposed to be developed. The Met Council has also approved of the previous Comp Plan amendment. The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the rezoning and site plan review a number of times over the past year. The applicant has subsequently changed their proposed site plan a number of times which was reviewed by the Planning Commission in March. Staff intends to present to the City Council on May 3. C) Deer Hill Preserve (Stonegate Farms) Final Plat — Property Resources Development Company has requested final plat approval for the Deer Hill Preserve CD-PUD subdivision, formerly known as Stonegate Farms. The first phase of the development is proposed to include 10 lots in the northeast corner of the site, near the current termination of Deerhill Road. The City Council reviewed at the April meeting and directed staff to prepare approval documents after the applicant submits adequate Conservation Easement and Land Stewardship documents. The applicant has now requested that the City construct Deerhill Road through a 429 Assessment process. Staff has begun preparing for this process, including preparation of necessary petition and waiver agreements. D) Just for Kix Site Plan Review, Variance, Lot Combination —45 Highway 55 — Just for Kix has requested approval of a Site Plan Review for construction of an 18,040 square foot building to include a dance studio and retail. The applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum hardcover in the Elm Creek shoreland overlay district from 25% to 50% and also a lot combination to combine the property annexed from the City of Plymouth. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the application will be presented to the Planning Commission when complete, potentially at the May 10 meeting. E) Excelsior Group Concept Plan —2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road — The Excelsior Group has requested review of a Concept Plan for development of 87 single family lots west of the proposed Wealshire site. The property is not within the current Staging period and the applicant seeks flexibility to jump ahead one period. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and the application will be presented to the Planning Commission when complete, potentially at the June 14 meeting. F) Kal Point Site Plan Review, PUD Amendment — 340 Clydesdale Trail — Kalyan Vempaty has requested an amendment to the Medina Clydesdale Marketplace PUD and a Site Plan Review to construct a commercial building containing a restaurant and upstairs office space on the final lot within Clydesdale Marketplace. Staff is conducting a preliminary review to determine if the application is complete for review. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 May 3, 2016 City Council Meeting December 8 meeting and recommended approval. The Council reviewed on January 5 and directed staff to prepare resolution of approval, which will be presented after the applicant secures approvals for the proposed shared parking. G) Hamel Brewery, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery, Wright -Hennepin Solar Panels —The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. H) Woods of Medina, Capital Knoll— These preliminary plats have been approved and staff is awaiting a final plat application I) Bradford Creek, Hamel Haven, Buehler subdivisions — These subdivisions have received final approval. Staff is working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before construction begins. Other Projects A) Comprehensive Plan — Staff is preparing for the May 14 and May 16 community meetings, and staff has sent out an invitation for all residents. Staff is also beginning drafts of various chapters of the Plan for review by the Steering Committee. B) Mixed -income Housing — I attended a presentation regarding policies related to mixed income housing developments. C) Floodplain Training — I attended a training presented by the MnDNR related to floodplain and shoreland practices. D) Cable Expansion Analysis — Planning staff has assisted with the analysis related to proposed cable construction for 2016. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 May 3, 2016 City Council Meeting MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT 600 Clydesdale Trail Medusa, MN 55340-9790 p:763.473-9209 f:763.473.8858 non -emergency: 763 -5 25.6210 MEMORANDUM Emergency 9-1-1 TO: City Administrator Scott Johnson and City Council FROM: Director Edgar J. Belland DATE: April 29, 2016 RE: Department Updates Reserves Annual Meeting On Apri124th the Medina Reserves held their annual meeting at the Choo-Choo restaurant. At the meeting Coordinator Officer Tom Gregory reviewed the reserve activity for 2015, with over 1,700 hours donated to the City valued at over $47,000 worth of time. The Reserves do a great job for the police department and city. I expressed my gratitude to them for their time and dedication. Volunteer Crime Prevention Specialist Steve Lundell, former reserve sergeant who served the reserve unit for 17 years and left the unit in 2014, approached me inquiring if there is any way he could assist the police department in another volunteer position. After looking at our needs, I had Sergeant Nelson develop a job description for a Volunteer Crime Prevention Specialist. Steve will be working in this capacity on special projects related to crime prevention, emergency management and other community events. It will be great to have Steve back working for the police department. His official start date will be May 2na Medina Celebration Day Planning Committee Meeting On Apri126th we held our second Medina Celebration Day planning meeting chaired by Anne Klaers. We were joined by three new members: Rick Traut from Farmers State Bank, Tina Tate from Hamel Fire and Lori Cousineau from our own City Council. The plans are moving forward for the 2016 event; we are working on a logo for the event and ordering signs for advertising. We will be sending out donation letters in June and working with local organizations for volunteers. If you would be interested in volunteering, please contact Anne at 763-473-9209. Unit Citation Award I was notified by Sheriff Stanek that Investigator Hall will be receiving a Unit Citation Award at the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Promotion and Award Ceremony on May 23, 2016, for his work on the arrest of a major heroin dealer linked to two deaths in the area, one being in Medina. I will be attending the ceremony. Minnesota Chiefs' Conference I attended the Minnesota Chiefs' Executive Training Institute in St. Cloud on April 17th through April 20th. The conference focus was on the challenges law enforcement are faced with today involving the community relations related to the use of force issues across the country. The challenges continue to grow for our profession. We have to learn from the events of today and train our officers on better ways of handling use of force options. We heard from several major city chiefs talking about incidents where their officers had shot unarmed black suspects or mentally ill individuals. In most of the cases the officers are cleared of criminal charges. The questions are: Can we do better? What do we need to change? It was very informative and change will come. De- escalation and critical incident training will lead the change. I attended breakout sessions on both subjects. It was a very good conference. Patrol by Sergeant Jason Nelson Training On April 19, 2016, I attended the Chiefs of Police training in St. Cloud. On April 25, 2016, Officer Boecker attended updated use of force and refresher training. On April 26, 2016, Investigator Domino attended Financial Crimes training in Bloomington. Other The Medina Police Department is going to become part of the Safe Spot Program. Safe Spots are designated public places where residents may exchange items that they have purchased/sold online. This allows people to have a public location to make legal transactions. Another purpose for Safe Spots is for child custody exchanges. The area will be located in the police department parking lot which will be posted by street signs and will also be video recorded as part of our building's existing security systems. This project will be promoted shortly via website, city newsletter and local papers. Patrol Activities For the dates of April 14 to April 26, 2016, our officers issued 26 citations and 65 warnings for various traffic infractions. There were a total of two driving while impaired arrests, four traffic accidents, seven medicals and 11 alarms. Officer Jessen, who is a certified Drug Recognition Expert, was called to assist the Minnetrista and Plymouth Police Departments with evaluations of parties who were arrested for driving under the influence other than alcohol. On April 19, 2016, Officer Boecker took a theft of dock report from a Lake Independence resident. The case was forwarded to Investigations. On April 20, 2016, I stopped a vehicle for having expired tabs. The driver was subsequently arrested for multiple outstanding warrants. The driver's wife was also arrested after methamphetamine was found inside her purse. The case was turned over to the West Metro Drug Task Force for further investigation. On April 23, 2016, Officer McKinley assisted the Minnesota State Patrol and West Hennepin Public Safety with locating several of the high value sports cars that were speeding on I-394. The State Patrol charged all of the drivers with reckless driving. Criminal Investigations by Investigator Charmane Domino A local man was trespassed from a store after repeatedly committing or attempting thefts. An unknown person attempted to wire money out of victim's bank account. The fraud was caught before any money had been sent. Report of a business civil dispute. The police department has received numerous similar reports about this business. A complaint to the Attorney General's Office has been made. Report of part of a dock missing from resident's property Open cases currently under investigation: 11 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: April 27, 2016 MEETING: May 3, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • Neighborhood information meetings were held on Tuesday, April 26th, at City Hall to discuss the three road projects presented in your packet with feasibility reports. Each road had fairly good representation, with a total of 12 in attendance. The residents had a positive attitude concerning the projects and the dollar amounts that would be assessed. • With all the rain the past couple of weeks, I kept the weight restrictions on the vulnerable roads longer than expected — the guys started removing the last of them just before the end of the month. • The Sioux Drive pre -con was held Wednesday, April 20th. We will be discussing schedules and timing. May 4th we are having a neighborhood meeting with the businesses being impacted by the project. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • Jack has been doing stock pile inspections for the new MS4 permit requirement. This is something the City is required to do quarterly as part of the permit. • The Well #8 project is on its way. The stormwater structure and the piping to the pond at Well # 7 is in. The vault at well #8 has been poured. Next we will be working on piping and the addition on pumphouse #3. This project will take most of the summer to complete. PARKS/TRAILS • The large soccer nets that were located at Morningside Park were moved over to the larger field at the new Park at Fields of Medina. We are looking for some slightly smaller nets that will fit better at the Morningside Park to replace the ones taken. • I met with Designing Nature and gave instruction to install the butterfly garden at the Hamel Community Center. • The crew has been working a lot at the Hamel Legion Park to prepare for the busy upcoming baseball season and other park uses. • We have taken down the old scoreboard at the Hawks Field and are preparing for the installation of the new one. MISCELLANEOUS • The PW guys received the trees for Cleanup Day on Wednesday and laid everything out for Saturday. Twenty of the trees were set aside for the final plantings for the Tower Drive Project. • Joe and I went to the 2016 Safety & Loss Control Workshop through the League of MN Cities on Wednesday, April 20th ORDER CHECKS APRIL 20, 2016 - MAY 3, 2016 44248 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY $4,606.02 44249 CITY OF ORONO $2,800.00 44250 ANNE, VENKATA KIRAN $250.00 44251 MOHAN CHETTIAR $250.00 44252 FERIN, DAVID & KAREN $21.96 44253 GIRL SCOUT TROOP 14698 $200.00 44254 HOLASEK, MEGAN $150.00 44255 KANODIA, KRISHNA $225.00 44256 MAGNUSON, LOUISE $500.00 44257 CITY OF MEDINA $300.00 44258 SHAH, SONAIL $700.00 44259 292 DESIGN GROUP INC $9,928.82 44260 ABDO, EICK & MEYERS LLP $15,000.00 44261 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC $194.62 44262 BUDGET PRINTING $11.61 44263 CAREFREE SERVICES INC $4,654.00 44264 CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT CO $134.80 44265 DITTER INC $874.66 44266 DPC INDUSTRIES INC $2,154.65 44267 EARL F ANDERSEN INC $401.91 44268 ECM PUBLISHERS INC $389.23 44269 FASTENAL COMPANY $223.88 44270 FINANCE AND COMMERCE $235.44 44271 GOODIN COMPANY $849.81 44272 GRAINGER $48.46 44273 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I $500.00 44274 HAMEL LIONS CLUB $550.00 44275 HENN CTY RESIDENT/REAL ESTATE $54.50 44276 HIRSHFIELDS $116.97 44277 HOLIDAY FLEET $1,489.37 44278 I-94 WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $120.00 44279 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED $21,590.77 44280 LARKIN AUTO $1,292.77 44281 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR $392.00 44282 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE $629.15 44283 MARCO INC $29.21 44284 MARK J TRAUT WELLS, INC $9,254.88 44285 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC $137.27 44286 MEDTOX LABS $49.03 44287 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT CO $1,749.22 44288 MORRIS ELECTRONICS INC. $112.50 44289 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC $187.58 44290 NORDGREN AUTOMATIVE INC $1,076.64 44291 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $160.00 44292 OFFICE DEPOT $307.88 44293 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC $7,227.04 44294 SHAGGIES LAWN CARE $5,533.34 44295 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC $340.94 44296 SKILLPATH SEMINARS $537.00 44297 STREICHER'S $249.96 44298 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL $537.90 44299 TEGRETE CORP $1,358.64 44300 TIMESAVER OFFSITE $203.00 44301 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY $46.75 44302 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $204.18 44303 WSB & ASSOCIATES $47,516.00 Total Checks $148.659.36 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS APRIL 20, 2016 - MAY 3, 2016 003629E PR PERA $14,273.96 003630E PR FED/FICA $15,683.88 003631E PR MN Deferred Comp $2,360.00 003632E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA $3,235.82 003633E SELECT ACCOUNT $793.12 003634E CITY OF MEDINA $19.00 003635E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $20.00 003636E SELECT ACCOUNT $156.94 003637E AFLAC $394.88 003638E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. $219.70 003639E DELTA DENTAL $2,604.60 003640E KONICA MINOLTA $168.48 003641E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN $1,975.87 003642E VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES $197.93 003643E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC $355.80 003644E MINNESOTA, STATE OF $968.00 003645E SELECT ACCOUNT $25.36 Total Electronic Checks $43,453.34 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT APRIL 20, 2016 507105 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L $1,314.63 507106 BARNHART, ERIN A. $1,965.67 507107 BELLAND, EDGAR J $3,522.48 507108 BOECKER, KEVIN D. $2,188.94 507109 CONVERSE, KEITH A $2,087.13 507110 DINGMANN, IVAN W $2,028.23 507111 DOMINO, CHARMANE $1,797.24 507112 ENDE, JOSEPH $1,409.33 507113 FINKE, DUSTIN D. $2,110.21 507114 GALLUP, JODI M $1,667.32 507115 GLEASON, JOHN M. $1,805.75 507116 GREGORY, THOMAS $1,887.59 507117 HALL, DAVID M. $2,010.89 507118 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S $2,273.82 507119 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. $2,226.35 507120 KLAERS, ANNE M $1,116.32 507121 LANE, LINDA $1,506.21 507122 LEUER, GREGORY J. $1,905.44 507123 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R $1,435.41 507124 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D $1,328.00 507125 NELSON, JASON $2,831.52 507126 PETERSON, DEBRA A. $1,614.14 507127 REINKING, DEREK M $1,554.25 507128 SCHERER, STEVEN T. $2,259.38 507129 STAPLE, AMANDA $247.24 507130 VIEAU, CECILIA M. $1,147.99 507131 WENANDE, BRANDON S $531.99 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $47,773.47