The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About12-19-2006LRALYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, Leticia Vasquez, CHAIR Reverend Alfreddie Johnson, Jr., VICE CHAIRMAN LOUIS Byrd, MEMBER Fernando Pedroza MEMBER Maria T. Santillan MEMBER CALIFORNIA 90262 -3845 (310) 603 -0220 This Agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered. Copies of the Staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection. A person who has a question concerning any of the agenda items may call the City Manager at (310) 603 -0220, ext. 200. AGENDA LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECEMBER 19, 2006 REGULAR MEETING 5:00 P.M. IN LCEIV ii� L CITY OF LYNWOOD CIT"ni ri n F DEC 14 2006 LYNWOOD CITY HALL, 11330 BULLIS ROAD LOUIS BYRD CHAIR tr AM V A 3 41516 FERNANDO PEDROZA REV. ALFREDDIE JOHNSON, JR. VICECHAIRMAN MEMBER MARIA T. SANTILLAN LETICIA VASQUEZ MEMBER MEMBER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR N. ENRIQUE MARTINEZ WILLIAM A. RAWLINGS AGENCY COUNSEL RONALD N. WILSON OPENING CEREMONIES A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call (BYRD- JOHNSON - PEDROZA - SANTILLAN- VASQUEZ) C. Certification of Agenda Posting by Secretary PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Agenpy or staff request specific items be removed from the consent calendar for separate action. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Regular Meeting of November 21, 2006 Regular Meeting of December 5, 2006 Special Meeting of December 11, 2006 2. RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING AND APPROVING THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS. 3. REQUEST CONCEPT APPROVAL OF THE OAKWOOD MIXED -USE PROJECT Comments Universal Property Investments, LLC submitted a proposal on October 23, 2006 to develop the Long Beach Boulevard between Oakwood Avenue and Los Flores Boulevard. 2 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Agency approve the concept for the Oakwood Mixed - Use project for the location at Long Beach Boulevard between Oakwood Avenue and Los Flores Boulevard. DISCUSSION ITEMS NONE CLOSED SESSION 4. WITH RESPECT TO EVERY ITEM OF BUSINESS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 54956.8 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR Property: 5400 through 5500 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., the east side of Wright Road, 11350 through 11700, 5400 through 5600 Cortland Avenue, and 11600 through 11700 Louise Street Agency Negotiator: Agency, Agency staff and Agency Counsel including, but not limited to William Rawlings and Ron Wilson Negotiating Parties: Vic Boyd Under Negotiation: Terms 5. WITH RESPECT TO EVERY ITEM OF BUSINESS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 54956.8 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PROPERTY: Atlantic /Carlin Housing Development Project -Real property on the northwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Carlin Avenue and identified by Assessor's Parcel Numbers below APNs 16186- 011 -083 1 6186 - 012 -005 6186 - 012 -023 6186- 012 -024 6186- 012 -027 6186 - 012 -032 6186- 012 -033 6186 - 012 -034 6186- 012 -037 6186 - 012 -038 6186- 012 -006 Agency negotiator: Agency, Agency Staff and Agency counsel including but Not limited to William Rawlings and Ronald Wilson Negotiating Parties: Agency, Abel Helou Under Negotiation: DDA terms and conditions ADJOURNMENT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING WILL BE HELD ON JANUARY 2, 2007 AT 5:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 11330 BULLIS ROAD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. 4 AGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 19, 2006 TO: Lynwood Redevelopment Agency Chairman & Members APPROVED BY: N. Enrique Martinez, Executive Director PREPARED BY: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerlt(pp Albert Espinoza, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Lynwood Redevelopment Agency Minutes Recommendation: Staff recommends the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency approve following minutes: • Regular Meeting, November 21, 2006 Regular Meeting, December 5, 2006 • Special Meeting, December 11, 2006 Background: N/A Fiscal Impact: N/A Coordinated With: N/A LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 21, 2006 The Lynwood Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lynwood met in a regular meeting in the Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 5:32 p.m. Chairman Vasquez presiding. Members Byrd, Johnson, Pedroza, Santillan, and Vasquez were present. Also present were Executive Director Martinez, City Attorney Beltran, Secretary Hooper, and City Treasurer Pygatt. Secretary Hooper announced that the Agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Agency or staff request specific items be removed from the consent calendar for separate action. It was moved by Member Byrd, seconded by Member Pedroza, to adopt the Warrant Register Resolution. Item #2 RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING AND APPROVING THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING AND APPROVING THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS THEREFORE ROLL CALL: AYES: MEMBERS BYRD, JOHNSON, PEDROZA, SANTILLAN, AND VASQUEZ NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE CLOSED SESSION Item #3 WITH RESPECT TO EVERY ITEM OF BUSINESS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 54956.8 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: 5400 through 5500 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., the east side of Wright Road, 11350 through 11700, 5400 through 5600 Cortland Avenue, and 11600 through 11700 Louise Street Agency Negotiator: Agency, Agency staff and Agency Counsel including, but not limited to William Rawlings and Ron Wilson Negotiating Parties: Vic Boyd Under Negotiation: Terms It was moved by Member Byrd, seconded by Member Pedroza, and carried to recess to closed session at 8:00 p.m. Agency reconvened at 9:05 p.m. City Attorney Beltran stated that Mayor Pro Tem Johnson did not participate in the discussion of closed session. The Council met on the aforementioned matters and with respect to the following: Item #3 WITH RESPECT TO EVERY ITEM OF BUSINESS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 54956.8 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: 5400 through 5500 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., the east side of Wright Road, 11350 through 11700, 5400 through 5600 Cortland Avenue, and 11600 through 11700 Louise Street Agency Negotiator: Agency, Agency staff and Agency Counsel including, but not limited to William Rawlings and Ron Wilson Negotiating Parties: Vic Boyd Under Negotiation: Terms Status report was provided. No action was taken. ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Member Pedroza, seconded by Member Byrd, and carried to adjourn the regular Lynwood Redevelopment Agency meeting at 9:07 p.m., in memory of Rosie Hope and Aaron Kennedy. Leticia Vasquez, Chairman Andrea L. Hooper, Secretary LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 5, 2006 The Lynwood Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lynwood met in a regular meeting in the Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 5:31 p.m. Chairman Vasquez presiding. Members Byrd, Johnson, Pedroza, Santillan, and Vasquez were present. Also present were Executive Director Martinez, City Attorney Beltran, Secretary Hooper, and City Treasurer Pygatt. Secretary Hooper announced that the Agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) NONE PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS The following people spoke against the proposed Lynwood Promenade project: Blanca Puentes, Eladia Hernandez, Alice Grant, Ramon Rodriguez, Janet Gutierrez, Carmen Sanchez, Carole Reiss, Rebecca Wells, Irene Garcia, Jarel Hunter, Jack Kean, Josephine Palacios, and Martha Mendez. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Agency or staff request specific items be removed from the consent calendar for separate action. It was moved by Member Pedroza, seconded by Member Byrd, to approve the minutes, adopt the Resolution, and receive & file staff reports. Item #1 MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Regular Meeting of November 7, 2006 Item #2 RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING AND APPROVING THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS RESOLUTION NO. 2006.056 ENTITLED: RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING AND APPROVING THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS THEREFORE Item #3 TREASURER'S QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Receive and file the quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ending March 31, 2006. 0i7SIS AYES: MEMBERS BYRD, JOHNSON, PEDROZA, SANTILLAN, AND VASQUEZ NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE DISCUSSION ITEMS —AGENCY REQUEST Item #4 LEASE AGREEMENT FOR AGENCY OWNED PROPERTY (VACANT LOT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STATE STREET AND FERNWOOD AVENUE) Grant Taylor introduced this item regarding Agency owned property located (vacant lot at the southwest corner of State street and Fernwood Ave.) Mayor Vasquez requested the land to get appraised. It was moved by Member Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Johnson, to authorize staff to negotiate a short term license charging a prorated daily rate based on the monthly rate that was charged the previous year for the use of the lot. AYES: MEMBERS BYRD, JOHNSON, PEDROZA, SANTILLAN, AND VASQUEZ NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE CLOSED SESSION Item #5 WITH RESPECT TO EVERY ITEM OF BUSINESS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 54956.8 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: Imperial Highway on the north, adjacent to Interstate 105 Freeway on the south, adjacent to Interstate 710 Freeway on the east, and along Atlantic Boulevard on the west Agency Negotiator: Agency, Agency staff and Agency Counsel including, but not limited to William Rawlings and Ron Wilson Negotiating Parties: Imperial Partners Under Negotiation: Terms It was moved by Member Byrd, seconded by Member Santillan, and carried to recess to closed session at 7:20 p.m. Agency reconvened at 8:07 p.m. City Attorney Beltran stated that the Council met on the aforementioned matters and with respect to the following: Item #5 WITH RESPECT TO EVERY ITEM OF BUSINESS TO BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 54956.8 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: Imperial Highway on the north, adjacent to Interstate 105 Freeway on the south, adjacent to Interstate 710 Freeway on the east, and along Atlantic Boulevard on the west Agency Negotiator: Agency, Agency staff and Agency Counsel including, but not limited to William Rawlings and Ron Wilson Negotiating Parties: Imperial Partners Under Negotiation: Terms Status report was provided. No action was taken. ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Member Santillan, seconded by Member Byrd, and carried to adjourn the regular Lynwood Redevelopment Agency meeting at 8:10 p.m., in memory of Charles Banks. Leticia Vasquez, Chairman Andrea L. Hooper, Secretary LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING DECEMBER 11, 2006 The Lynwood Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lynwood met in a special meeting at Bateman Hall, 11331 Ernestine Ave., on the above date at 5:25 p.m. Chairman Byrd presiding. Members Johnson, Pedroza, Santillan, Vasquez, and Byrd were present. Also present were Executive Director Martinez, City Attorney Beltran, Secretary Hooper, City Treasurer Pygatt, and Royce Jones — Attorney representing the Redevelopment Agency. Secretary Hooper announced that the Agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Chairman Byrd stated at the beginning of the meeting that each person speaking would have 3 minutes and that Executive Director Martinez would serve as moderator. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS The following people made comments against imminent domain, the proposed Lynwood Promenade project, and other issues: Susan Cahun, Alex Landeros, and Rebecca Wells, Aide Castro, Frank Calderon, Irene Garcia, Gloria Jaimes, Tony Martinez, Ramon Rodriguez, Ronald Dupier, Sylvia Ortiz, Janet Gutierrez, Joaquin Mesinas, Pastor Marquez, Daniel (MECHA), Martha Gomez, Hilda Paez, Crystal Santos, Sylvia Valencia, Maria Herrera, Nathan Wells. DISCUSSION ITEMS — AGENCY REQUEST Item #1 LYNWOOD PROMENADE ENA DISCUSSION AND STATUS UPDATE Before the start of the discussion of this item, Agency Member Santillan excused herself from the meeting due to a potential conflict of interest. Ms. Santillan lives in the proposed project area. Royce Jones, Esq. made a presentation on behalf of the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency. He asked each Agency Member if they changing their position regarding the use of imminent domain to take schools or personal property for this project. Vice Chairman Pedroza responded by saying NO to imminent domain. He said he will not take away schools, businesses, or homes to make room for this project. He commented he fought to bring Marco Antonio Firebaugh High School to Lynwood. Member Johnson responded by saying NO to imminent domain. He said he will not take away schools, business, or homes to make room for this project. He's willing to meet with anybody from the public to discuss this project. The Council Members and the public need to be open to economic development opportunities. He also commented on the need to increase revenue for the City. Projects of this size would bring much needed revenue to the City. After he made his comments, Member Johnson excused himself from the dais. Member Vasquez responded by saying she is firm in her position — NO to imminent domain. She will not take away schools, business, or homes to make room for this project. She said the City needs to explore economic development projects so the City can increase its revenues. Millions of dollars are leaving Lynwood when residents shop at surrounding Cities. She talked about the importance of adding technology and service type jobs to this City. Furthermore, the City is looking at all options pertaining to the ENA. The developer is currently in default of the five hundred thousand dollar deposit and all steps have been taken to notify the developer. The developer has until December 20, 2006 to comply with the ENA. Chairman Byrd responded by saying NO to imminent domain. He said he will not take away schools, business, or homes to make room for this project. He said this project does not qualify for imminent domain. Royce Jones reported that the developer has until December 20, 2006 to make a five hundred thousand dollar deposit to the City pertaining to the ENA. After discussion, it was moved by Member Vasquez, seconded by Vice Chairman Pedroza, to NOT use imminent domain to take businesses, schools, or personal property to build Lynwood Promenade. ROLL CALL: AYES: MEMBERS PEDROZA, VASQUEZ, BYRD NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: JOHNSON, SANTILLAN ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Member Vasquez, seconded by Vice Chairman Pedroza, and carried to adjourn the special Lynwood Redevelopment Agency meeting at 9:15 p.m. Louis Byrd, Chairman Andrea L. Hooper, Secretary AGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 19, 2006 TO: Honorable Chairperson and Members - f thq Lynwood Redevelopment Agency APPROVED BY: N. Enrique Martinez, Executive Director ` PREPARED BY: Christy Valencia, Deputy Director of Finance Monica Castellanos, Accounting Technician SUBJECT: Approval of the Warrant Register Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the Agency Chairperson and Board Members approve the warrant register for F.Y. 2006 -07. ----- - - - - -- Attached Warrant Register dated December 19, 2006---- - - - - -- AGZII�A ITEM m 0 a 3 R D e m ] n1 7 ro m w N C y m w ] a w n R J m y m a t R J m y nr n 0 y n 1 O D F_ x n H N U N x r. II m n 11 11 EJ N O Y N Y P M W µ N A A m A N V V V�V [W N-�x}}N NN it D a W W W W W W W 1 M is 1003 VPmA�W O '1 A iI z a i 1 NNN V t ) NN I n 0 A 1 I M in P P Pi� a"o, P R { J A CS l" 1 .RN J ODDZD�l,zz �i i aa � zz 1 1 �m . m r- 0 1 �r 00 a yo m ° zoF ,, i 0 a ii m m ? r 0 Dr , 2i I - M 3 3 -i r z ;U W W mm oe mm z N cn z mss 00 r m ^5k - �t +1 dFi 3 OO z mm �m f' " nn R a n � mm m o n a cry R:: Ulm P z b 03 `v< j zn D< n rm ��A 9 m ] ✓ b ' v ^ n < !+ < v O N n rb I m N n � p ] y 0 V 1 0 A V V '� nm ' ] r ]WOG7T -,V V Jg o A N o r J , 0 .0ti c o l • 4V� + 10 0 N "k x.3. 03 m m D w C3 co DMO O mrUi.Kh O?jq O] O O O:k]' -1 W W £ f D2 m s m 4 z c �c m. m r oc 9 V 0 O z z O 1 m m z O i i i i I u u n D u U I i z s m ` m <' I n 9 I O I yl: YI I I mm nn ;9 999 j y t l .,1 n1 7 ro m w N C y m w ] a w n R J m y m a t R J m y nr n 0 y n 1 O D F_ x n H N U N x r. II m n 11 11 EJ N O Y N Y P M W µ N A A m A N V V V�V [W N-�x}}N NN it D a W W W W W W W 1 M is 1003 VPmA�W O '1 A iI z a i 1 NNN V t ) NN I n 0 A 1 I M in P P Pi� a"o, P R { J A CS l" 1 .RN J ODDZD�l,zz �i i aa � zz 1 1 �m . m r- 0 1 �r 00 a yo m ° zoF ,, i 0 a ii m m ? r 0 Dr , 2i I - M 3 3 -i r z ;U W W mm oe mm z N cn z mss 00 r m ^5k - �t +1 dFi 3 OO z mm �m f' " nn R a n � mm m o n a cry R:: Ulm P z b 03 `v< j zn D< n rm ��A 9 m ] ✓ b ' v ^ n < !+ < v O N n rb I m N n � p ] y 0 V 1 0 A V V '� nm ' ] r ]WOG7T -,V V Jg o A N o r J , 0 .0ti c o l • 4V� + 10 0 N "k x.3. 03 m m D w C3 co DMO O mrUi.Kh O?jq O] O O O:k]' -1 W W £ f D2 m s m 4 z c �c m. m r oc 9 V 0 O z z O 1 m m z O i i i i I AGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 19, 2006 TO: Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency fa �� APPROVED BY: N. Enrique Martinez, Executive Direct PREPARED BY: William A. Rawlings, Redevelopment "` erector Olivia L. Segura, Deputy Director of Redevelopment SUBJECT: REQUEST CONCEPT APPROVAL OF THE OAKWOOD MIXED - USE PROJECT Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Agency approve the concept for the Oakwood Mixed use project for the location at Long Beach Boulevard between Oakwood Avenue and Los Flores Boulevard. Background: Universal Property Investments, LLC submitted a proposal on October 23, 2006 to develop Long Beach Boulevard between Oakwood Avenue and Los Flores Boulevard. This developer owns the land and is not requesting financial assistance from the Agency or the City. The developer is requesting an expedited approval on the project. The total site area is approximately 48,570 S.F. with ground floor retail and parking and residential above. The commercial/retail portion of the project is 14,600 S.F. including 73 retail parking spaces. The residential portion of the project would be located on the third floor and would offer 19 two bedroom condominiums of 1280 S.F. each. The total amount of parking spaces for the residential portion is 48. The Redevelopment Sub - Committee met on December 12, 2006 to discuss this project in detail. The Sub - Committee recommended approval of the project and directed staff to prepare an agenda item requesting Agency Board approval. ANALYSIS This analysis is based on, among other things, an evaluation of the benefits to our community given the following key criteria and is based predomingntly on AQEPA ITEM data provided by the Developer which has not been verified by an independent source. 1. Sales Tax and Tax Increment Benefits to the City 2. Temporary/Permanent Jobs Generated in the City 3. Specific Amenities for the City 4. Furtherance of the City's Housing Goals 5. Compliance with the Specific Plan /Comparison to possible other uses 6. Net cost to the City 1. Sales Tax and Tax Increment Benefits to the City Sales Tax The developer estimates that the retail portion of the project will bring approximately $51,000 of sales tax annually. Tax Increment The developer estimates that the property tax for this project will be approximately $169,265.58 annually. 2. Job Creation The developer states that the project will produce 80 temporary construction jobs and approximately 40 -50 permanent job opportunities. 3. Specific Amenities for the City The project will bring 14,600 S.F. of retail including restaurants and a bank. The developer is proposing the following businesses: Metro PCS, Wells Fargo Bank, Nike Store, Fantastic Sams, Cold Stone Creamery and Pasta Primavera Cafe. The project is also proposing nineteen two bedroom condominiums units of 1280 S.F. each. 4. Furtherance of City's Housin_a Plan The project is proposing nineteen two bedroom condominiums units of 1280 S.F. each. 5. The proposal meets the requirements set forth in the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan and includes mixed -use high density, commercial and residential building with first floor businesses and pedestrian friendly areas. The structure is in line with the Specific Plan's Downtown Village II area and offers an elegant Italianate /Mediterranean architecture. 6. Cost to the Agency and City The developer has clearly stated that they are not requesting any financial assistance from the Agency or the City. CONCLUSION The proposal submitted by Universal Property Investments, LLC proposes several amenities for the City. These amenities include housing and retail in accordance with the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan. The proposal also clearly responds to the following criteria: 1. Sales Tax and Tax Increment Benefits to the City 2. Temporary/Permanent Jobs Generated in the City 3. Specific Amenities for the City 4. Furtherance of the City's Housing Goals 5. Compliance with the Specific Plan/Comparison to possible other uses 6. Net cost to the City and Return on Investment Staff recommends that the Agency approve the proposed concept for the following reasons: 1. The proposal complies with the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan. 2. The project requires no land acquisition as the land is owned by the developer. 3. The project does not require financial assistance from the Agency or the City. 4. The project assists the City with reaching its housing requirement. 5. The project will bring additional sales tax revenue through the retail portion of the project and tax increment due to increased property tax value. 6. Additional jobs (80 temporary construction jobs and 40 -50 permanent) Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact to the City or the Agency as the developer owns the development site and is not requesting financial assistance. Coordinated With: Executive Director Agency Counsel