Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPKT-CC-2017-12-12Moab City Council December 12, 2017 Pre -Council Workshop 6:30 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CENTER (217 East Center Street) Page 1 of 235 Page 2 of 235 City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Main Number (435) 259-5121 Fax Number (435) 259-4135 www.moabcity.org Moab City Council Regular Council Meeting City Council Chambers Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. ..........................................•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 6:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. SECTION 1: SECTION 2: SECTION 3: SECTION 4: SECTION 5: SECTION 6: SECTION 7: PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1-1 November 14, 2017 CITIZENS TO BE HEARD PROCLAMATIONS PRESENTATIONS 4-1 Presentation of the Mayor's Student Citizenship of the Month Award for November 2017 for Helen M. Knight School 4-2 Presentation of the Annual Audit of the City of Moab for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 PUBLIC HEARING (Approximately 7:15 PM) 5-1 Proposed Resolution #01-2018 — A Resolution Establishing Storm Water Utility Rates 5-2 Proposed Resolution#02-2018 — A Resolution Revising Miscellaneous Culinary Water Use Fees and Clarifying Rates for Multiple Residentail Dwellings that Share a Water Meter SPECIAL EVENTS/VENDORS/BEER LICENSES/SOLICITORS None CONSENT AGENDA 7-1 Request for Approval of a Sole Source Purchase to Recreonics, Inc. for a Wibits Sports Modular Aquatic Play System in an amount not to exceed $16,605 7-2 Request to Set a Public Hearing Date of January 9, 2018 for the Proposed Waste Hauling Commerical Rate Changes 7-3 Request for Approval of a Sole Source Purchase to Precision Concrete Cutting for a Sidewalk Trip Hazard Repair Bid in an amount not to exceed $25,000 7-4 Approval and Award of the SCADA Monitoring System for the City of Moab Culinary Water Department to Dorsett Technologies in an amount not to exceed $150,000 Page 3 of 235 7-5 Request for Approval of Three Public Utility Easement Agreements for 500 West Utilities SECTION 8: NEW BUSINESS 8-1 Acceptance of the Annual Audit of the City of Moab for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 8-2 Adoption of the Moab Storm Water Master Plan (October 2017) 8-3 First Reading and Possible Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2017-39 - An Ordinance Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code, Title 10 Vehicles and Traffic 8-4 Discussion Regarding Upcoming Regional Water Board Vacancies 8-5 Approval of 2018 Moab City Council Meeting Schedule 8-6 Approval of 2018 Moab City Holiday Schedule 8-7 Approval of Proposed Resolution #62-2017 - A Resolution Approving an Interlocal Agreement as to the provision of County -wide Recreation Services, by and among the City of Moab, the Grand County Special Services Recreation District and the Grand County School District SECTION 9: OLD BUSINESS 9-1 Approval of Proposed Resolution #63-2017 - A Resolution Approving the first amendment to the Development Improvements Agreement for the Slot Canyon Renovation Project at 245 Williams Way 9-2 Approval of Proposed Resolution #61-2017 - A Resolution Approving a Boundary Line Adjustment for Lots 1 and 2 of the ROUFA Subdivision and the Improvements Agreement for Public Improvements as Submitted by Chad Harris 9-3 Approval of Change Order #1 for the Pack Creek Bank Grading Project 9-4 Approval of Proposed Resolution #58-2017 - A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Annual Budget SECTION 10: ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS SECTION 11: MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS SECTION 12: READING OF CORRESPONDENCE SECTION 13: APPROVAL OF BILLS AGAINST THE CITY OF MOAB SECTION 14: EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION 14-1 An Executive Session to Discuss the Character, Professional Competence, or Physical or Mental Health of an Individual SECTION 15: ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org Page 4 of 235 MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -- DRAFT REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 14, 2017 Regular Meeting & Attendance: The Moab City Council held its Regular Meeting on the above date in the Council Chambers at the Moab City Center, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. A recording of the meeting is archived at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html. Pre -Council Workshop: Mayor David Sakrison called the Workshop to order at 6:30 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Heila Ershadi, Tawny Knuteson-Boyd and Kyle Bailey. Also in attendance were City Manager David Everitt, City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Rachel Stenta, City Attorney Chris McAnany, Public Works Director Pat Dean, City Treasurer Jennie Ross, Community Services Director Amy Weiser, Planning Director Jeff Reinhart, Planning Assistant Sommar Johnson, Recorder Assistant Eve Tallman, and Parks, Recreation, and Trails Director Tif Miller. The Workshop began with a review of the Canvass of the Votes of the 2017 General Election. City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Stenta noted that an additional 32 ballots were counted after election night, because they arrived by mail or were provisional ballots that were later qualified and counted. Stenta noted the general election ballots which were cast reflected a 75.56 percent voter turnout, the highest ever recorded. City Manager Everitt and City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Stenta presented information regarding the 2018 Health Insurance Proposal. Everitt noted the health insurance cost increase would be 12.5 percent. He discussed incentivizing a wellness program in an effort to contain cost increases. Mayor Sakrison asked for details and Stenta described the City match to employee Health Savings Accounts, the "TelaDoc" service, and educational programs for employees. Stenta praised the work of the staff committee which considers health insurance matters. Councilmember Bailey reported on a meeting he attended regarding the proposed Spanish Valley Area Plan, including development on State and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) property in San Juan County. He noted the proposal calls for 2,000 housing units. Mayor Sakrison asked about water and Bailey explained the proposed project would require more than 1,000 Acre Feet and there are currently 500 Acre Feet of water allocated. Mayor Sakrison announced the website to follow the proposed project and provide public input is www.ldi-ut.com/spanishvalley. Mayor Sakrison noted the substantial increase proposed for selected national park entrance fees. Everitt added the City has received significant correspondence regarding the proposed Arches reservation system. Bailey asked if there was a study done on the economic impact of reservation -only entry to the Park. Councilmembers discussed whether the City should send a letter protesting the size of the proposed increase, and both Sakrison and Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd stated they would share their own comments. Regular Meeting Called to Order: (:29 on recording) Mayor Sakrison called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 6:57 PM and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Twenty-five members of the public and media were present. Page 1 of 5 November 14, 2017 Page 5 of 235 1-1 Minutes Approval of Minutes: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve the minutes of the October 10, 16, 17, and 27, 2017 meetings with corrections. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. Citizens to be Heard: The following Citizens were heard: Deb Dull, Regional Business Manager for Rocky Mountain Power, spoke about Mayor Sakrison's legacy regarding Moab's honor as the nation's first Blue Sky Community. She noted Mayor Sakrison and the City of Moab were presented with plaques venerating the Mayor's and the City's commitment to renewable energy. Roxanne Bierman, Executive Director of the Canyonlands Natural History Association, spoke about City funding for the Moab Information Center (MIC). She noted the MIC is primarily funded by the County and Cooperating agencies, and that the Travel Council pitches in. Mayoral Presentation of Student of the Month: (:35 on recording) Mayor Sakrison presented Nixon Curtis with the Mayor's Student Citizenship of the Month Award for October, 2017 for Helen M. Knight School. The Mayor also presented Kaci Hamilton with the Mayor's Student Citizenship of the Month Award for November, 2017 for the Helen M. Knight School. Public Hearing: City Manager Everitt presented proposed amendments to the budget for the mid -year budget amendment. He noted the sales tax trend is positive, with double-digit increases. He mentioned the Transient Room Tax (TRT) is also growing. He mentioned no personnel additions are proposed in this mid -year budget amendment, and went on to explain the highlights of the proposed changes. Mayor Sakrison requested staff to ensure all changes for water and sewer administration are accounted for, per recent legislative changes. Councilmember Bailey commented on the MIC funding request, noting that the City has assisted with the upkeep of the public restrooms in the past. Mayor Sakrison opened a public hearing to receive input on Proposed Resolution #58-2017 — A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Annual Budget at 7:10 PM. There were no citizens to be heard, and the Mayor kept the hearing open through the end of the meeting. Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses: Tree Lighting Ceremony and Electric Light Parade —Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to approve licenses and permits for a Special Event License and Parade Application for the Moab Area Chamber of Commerce for the Tree Lighting Ceremony on Friday, December 1, 2017 at Swanny City Park and the 2017 Electric Light Parade on Saturday, December 2, 2017 along Main Street. Councilmember Ershadi seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. Councilmember Ershadi moved to approve a Request for Approval of a Fee Waiver for the Tree Lighting and Electric Light Parade in an amount not to exceed $400. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded Page 2 of 5 November 14, 2017 Page 6 of 235 1-1 Minutes the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. La Sal House Beer License —Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve licenses and permits for Approval of a Class II Beer License for Wesley Shannon, doing business as La Sal House Restaurant, Located at 11 East 100 North. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. La Sal House Full Service Restaurant Liquor License —Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to Grant Local Consent for a Full -Service Restaurant Liquor License for La Sal House Restaurant, LLC, Located at 11 East 100 North. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. Consent Agenda: (1:04 on recording) Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. The following items were approved: 1) Request for Approval of a State Approved Contract Purchase to Bonneville Equipment for a Kubota Tractor with Mower Deck in an amount not to exceed $14,000 2) Approval of a Planning Loan Agreement by and between the State of Utah and the City of Moab for the purpose of an Engineering Planning Study of the City's Drinking Water System in the Amount of $90,000 3) Approval of an Amended Donor Agreement by and between Dell A. Keys and the City of Moab 4) Approval of Proposed Resolution #60-2017 — A Resolution Adopting the City of Moab Health Reimbursement Arrangement Plan and Summary Plan Description Documents 5) Request to Set a Public Hearing Date of the Storm Water Fee Increase as December 12, 2017 at approximately 7:15 PM New Business: (1:06 on recording) Canvass of the Moab General Election —Approved Councilmember Bailey moved to accept the Canvass of Votes from the Moab City General Election held on November 7, 2017. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Stenta explained the canvass comprises the final audit, including those who voted absentee and provisional ballots, and Acceptance of the Final Election Return. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. Motor Vehicle Access and Driveways —Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to approve Proposed Ordinance #2017-37 — An Ordinance to Repeal Moab Municipal Code Section 17.09.350, Motor Vehicle Access, and Amending Chapter 12.08 with the Addition of a New Section 12.08.070, Motor Vehicle Access, Dealing with the Page 3 of 5 November 14, 2017 Page 7 of 235 1-1 Minutes Location and Widths of Driveway in Specific Zones. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. Airport Board and Southeastern Utah Association of Local Government Board Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to table the discussion regarding Appointments to the Grand County Airport Board and the Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments (SEUALG) Board. He stated is was desirous to await the seating of the new Council. There was no second, and the motion to table failed. Discussion: Discussion ensued, and Mayor Sakrison stated he would like to get new appointees on the Airport and SEUALG boards soon. He noted the SEUALG Board makes a lot of decisions affecting Moab, on topics such as Community Development Block Grants and social services. Councilmember Bailey asked if the Health District was under the purview of this group and the Mayor stated he did not know. Audience member and Council member -elect Karen Guzman -Newton, and audience member and Mayor -elect Emily Niehaus confirmed they were willing to serve on the Airport Board and SEUALG Board, respectively. Mayor Sakrison invited newly -elected officials to attend the next meeting of the Utah League of Cities and Towns, and Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd indicated she would also like to attend. Water Reclamation Facility Quality Assurance Testing —Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to approve a Task Order with Bowen Collins & Associates for Water Reclamation Facility Quality Assurance Testing in an amount not to exceed $45,000. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. North Area Sewer Lift Station —Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve a Task Order with Bowen Collins & Associates for the North Area Sewer Lift Station Preliminary Engineering Report in an amount not to exceed $19,546. Councilmember Ershadi seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. 100 South Emergency Road Crown Project —Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve a Single Source Procurement Purchase for the 100 South Emergency Road Crown Project with LeGrand Johnson in an amount not to exceed $46,544. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. 100 South Reconstruction Landscaping —Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to approve a Task Order with Hansen Allen and Luce for the 100 South Reconstruction Landscaping Improvements Project in an amount not to exceed $98,500. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. Mayor and Council Reports: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd reported on the Beacon open house, as well as the Utah State Page 4 of 5 November 14, 2017 Page 8 of 235 1-1 Minutes University stakeholder meeting. She noted the Memorandum of Understanding was signed. She also reported on a regional mobility meeting she attended hosted by the Utah Department of Transportation. Reading of Correspondence: Councilmember Ershadi stated she would forward correspondence she had received. Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab: Councilmember Bailey moved to pay the bills against the City of Moab in the amount of $2,110,604.41. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye. Closing of the Public Hearing: Mayor Sakrison closed the public hearing at 8:05 PM. Adjournment: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Ershadi seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi and Knuteson- Boyd voting aye. Mayor Sakrison adjourned the meeting at 8:05 PM. APPROVED: ATTEST: David L. Sakrison, Mayor Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder Page 5 of 5 November 14, 2017 Page 9 of 235 1-1 Minutes Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 #: 5-1 Title: Storm Water Utility Rate Changes Date Submitted: December 1, 2017 Staff Presenter: David Everitt Attachment(s): - Draft resolution - Schedule A: Storm Water Utility Fees - FY 2018 Storm Water Utility Fund budget and cash on hand Recommended Motion: I move to approve the resolution establishing the storm water utility rates for the City of Moab. Background/Summary: The City of Moab's Storm Water Utility Fund was created in 2008 to support citywide storm water collection, conveyance, and retention infrastructure. The Fund has paid for a number of projects over the years, and is the primary source of funding for the upcoming 100E/100S improvements that are scheduled for construction in 2018. The Fund will also provide the bulk of the cost associated with the City's portion of the improvements that will be constructed in association with UDOT's 191 widening project on the north end of town in 2018-2019. While there is currently some cash -on -hand in this Fund, it is not enough to cover the expected costs associated with the 191 widening project as well as nearly $6 million in additional future projects that are identified in the recently completed Storm Water Master Plan. The proposed rate change is an increase from $2.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit ("ERU") to $4.00 per ERU. The Storm Water Utility Fund's FY 2018 budget (as proposed for the first budget amendment) and fund balances are attached for reference. Page 10 of 235 5-1 Public Hearing CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO. 2018-01, A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING STORM WATER UTILITY RATES The following describes the intent and purpose of this resolution: a. The City of Moab operates a Storm Water Utility that manages the runoff from public and private property within the City; b. The City recently completed a Storm Water Master Plan that identifies the need for significant capital improvements estimated to cost over $6 million; c. The City anticipates higher operations and maintenance costs as demands on the system increase and infrastructure ages; d. The City anticipates higher debt service obligations due to financing future large storm water retention and conveyance capital projects; e. The City finds that it is necessary and appropriate that beneficiaries of the storm water retention and conveyance system pay their proportionate share of all of the ongoing operations and maintenance needs and capital costs of the system; f. The City finds that the current fee is inadequate to cover existing and future operations and maintenance costs for the storm water system; g• An increase to the current fee is necessary to cover future capital improvement costs; h. The City finds that periodic changes to the rate structure are necessary and appropriate as project and maintenance costs change; i. The City has storm water rate setting authority pursuant to U.C.A. § 10-8-38, and other authorities. j. The City finds that the proposed rate changes are reasonable and consistent with the objectives and policies described above. Therefore, the City hereby enacts the storm water utility rates in Schedule A, attached. 1 Page 11 of 235 5-1 Public Hearing Passed and adopted by a majority vote of the City Council. This Resolution will take effect on January 9, 2018, and the rate changes will be implemented as soon as is practical. Mayor Emily S. Niehaus Date Attest: Rachel Stenta, Recorder Date 2 Page 12 of 235 5-1 Public Hearing Schedule A: Storm Water Utility Rates Rate Residential 4.00 per month for single-family and duplex homes on a single lot Commercial $4.00 per month per storm water ERU* * Every 3,000 square feet of impervious surface = 1 ERU. Every 6,000 square feet of semi - impervious surface = 1 ERU. 1 Revised December, 2m7 Page 13 of 235 5-1 Public Hearing Storm Water Utility Enterprise Fund 2016 - 2017 Year End Actual 2017- 2018 Approved Budget FY18 B.O. Admin Recommendation Notes for council Operating Income 53.36450 STORM WATER DRAINAGE FEE $142,595 $284,000 ($75,000) Need to implement the fee increase Total Operating Income $142,595 $284,000 ($75,000) Non -Operating Income 53.36112 TFER FROM BEG F.B. $158,700 Grant revenue (?) $36,264 From DWQ for Holland riparian restoration project Total Non -Operating Income $158,700 $36,264 Total Revenue $442,700 $0 ($38,736) Operating Expense 53.40009 Storm wtr GENERAL FUND 0/H $4,000 $45,000 53.40010 Storm wtr SALARIES & WAGES $38,000 - ($19,000) Have not hired yet 53.40013 Storm wtr EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $30,000 ($15,000) Have not hired yet 53.40075 Storm wtr SPECIAL PROJECTS $7,350 - Total Operating Expense $11,350 $113,000 - ($34,000) Net impact to Storm Water Fund Balance $131,245 $329,700 ($4,736) Pull from fund balance Storm Water Capital Expenses 100 SOUTH STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS $309,700 MINOR STORM WATER PROJECTS $0 RIPARIAN HABITAT STUDY $10,000 Riparian Habitat Restoration Projects $10,000 $36,264 Holland restoration project 1661.1 - Equipment - General $0 Total Direct Purchase: $329,700 $0 $36,264 Storm Water Fund Balance end of FY17 $ 1,440,788.33 Projected Balance end of FY18 $ 1,277,352.33 Page 14 of 235 5-1 Public Hearing Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 #: 5-2 Title: Miscellaneous Culinary Water Rate Changes and Clarification Regarding Charges for Multiple Dwellings on a Shared Meter Date Submitted: December 1, 2017 Staff Presenter: David Everitt Attachment(s): - Draft resolution - Schedule A - Water Rates - Resolution 2012-11 - Water rates (for comparison) Recommended Motion: I move to adopt the resolution revising miscellaneous culinary water use fees and clarifying rates for multiple residential dwellings that share a water meter. Background/Summary: The City Council approved significant changes to the commercial and residential water rate schedule earlier this year. These changes did not include adjustments to some lesser -used rates, which are: Fire Line Rate - Bed and Breakfasts within the City - Firefighter Rate within the City - City Parks and Cemeteries - Moab Golf Course Well #7 This recommendation includes increases to the Fire Line, City Parks and Cemeteries, and the Golf Course rates. The Bed and Breakfast rate would be removed from the rate schedule and B&Bs would be assessed at the standard commercial rate. The Firefighter rate would also be removed. Furthermore, in order to ensure that residential water users are charged equitably, this resolution includes proposed language that would grant the Page 15 of 235 5-1 Public Hearing City Manager discretion to assess either a commercial or residential rate - whichever is lower - for residences that are on a shared meter. Page 16 of 235 5-1 Public Hearing Resolution #11-2012 ESTABLISHING WATER USAGE RATES FOR THE CITY OF MOAB Whereas, water usage charges are the primary source of revenue for the City of Moab Water Enterprise Fund; and Whereas, revenues from water usage charges are currently not sufficient in amount to cover the Water Enterprise Fund's regular operational costs; and Whereas, the Moab Governing Body deems it necessary to increase water usage charges in an amount to cover the regular operational costs of the Water Fund; and Whereas, the Moab Governing Body should establish sewer rates by resolution; NOW THEREFORE, WE, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MOAB DO HEREBY RESOLVE TO ADOPT THE CITY OF MOAB RATE SCHEDULES AS FOLLOWS: Water Rate Schedule A. Rate Number 1 Minimum charge Next 3,000 gallons - Next 5,000 gallons - Next 40,000 gallons - Over 50,000 gallons Commercial within the City: - $10.12 for 2,000 gallons or less per month $2.24 per thousand gallons per month $.57 per thousand gallons per month $.66 per thousand gallons per month - $.79 per thousand gallons per month The rates set out in this subsection shall apply to all commercial users within the City including multiple dwellings, duplex dwellings, and apartment houses, but not including single family dwellings. B. Rate Number 2 Residential within the City: Minimum charge - $5.93 for 2,000 gallons or less per month Next 8,000 gallons - $.47 per thousand gallons per month Over 10,000 gallons - $.64 per thousand gallons per month The rates set out in this subsection shall apply to all single-family residential users within the City. Where more than one single-family dwelling is served through a single meter, the minimum charge shall be made for each dwelling served. C. Rate Number 3 Commercial outside the City: Minimum charge - $20.24 for 2,000 gallons or less per month Next 3,000 gallons - $4.50 per thousand gallons per month Next 5,000 gallons - $1.15 per thousand gallons per month Next 40,000 gallons- $1.33 per thousand gallons per month Over 50,000 gallons- $1.58 per thousand gallons per month Resolution411-2012 1uog24l2 Nat I n1.3 5-2 Public Hearing Page 17 of 235 D. Rate Number 4 Minimum charge Next 8,000 gallons - Over 10,000 gallons Residential outside the City: - $11.86 for 2,000 gallons or less per month $.94 per thousand gallons per month - $1.29 per thousand gallons per month The rates set out in subsections C and D shall apply to all uses outside the City within a radius of two miles of the intersection of Center and Main Street within the City. Water usage outside the specified radius shall be charged at a rate determined by the City Council. E. Rate Number 5 Fire line rate Flat rate of $5.62 per thousand gallons per month F. Rate Number 6 Bed and breakfasts within the City: All bed and breakfasts are required to pay the City's prevailing commercial water rate on the portion of the dwelling that is used as a bed and breakfast, and the City's prevailing residential rate on the portion of the dwelling that is used as a residence. The portion of the dwelling that is used as a bed and breakfast shall be calculated according to the following formula: 1. Square footage of the number of allowed bedroom rentals as specified in the Conditional Use permit; plus 2. One-third the square footage of the kitchen area where bed and breakfast meals are prepared; plus 3. Sum of the bed and kitchen square footage calculated in Section 17.70.060 (D) (H2) divided by the total square footage of the bed and breakfast establishment as recorded in the Conditional Use permit. G. Rate Number 7 Minimum charge Next 8,000 gallons - Over 10,000 gallons H. I. Firefighter rate within the City: - Free for 2,000 gallons or less per month $.47 per thousand gallons per month - $.64 per thousand gallons per month Rate Number 8 City Parks and Cemeteries: $ 27 per thousand gallons per month Rate Number 9 Moab Golf Course Well # 7 rate: $.11 per thousand gallons per month J. Rate Number 10 Public Works Yard Water Hauler rate: $2.24 per thousand gallons K. Rate Number 11 Fire Hydrant Construction Water rate: $2.24 per thousand gallons Resolution #11-2012 ,une 2012 ]'ate 2 nl'3 5-2 Public Hearing Page 18 of 235 All rates are subject to an annual adjustment for inflation, as determined by the City Council. This resolution shall take effect July I, 2012. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing body of Moab City in open session this 12th day of June, 2012. Attest: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder Resolution # 11-2012 CITY OF MOAB By: David L. Sakrison Mayor June 2012 Page ? of 3 5-2 Public Hearing Page 19 of 235 CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO. 2o18-02, A RESOLUTION REVISING MISCELLANEOUS CULINARY WATER USE FEES AND CLARIFYING RATES FOR MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS THAT SHARE A WATER METER The following describes the intent and purpose of this resolution: a. The City of Moab significantly revised its culinary water use rates in June 2m7; b. These revisions did not address the following: Fire Line rate, Bed and Breakfast rates, the Firefighter rate, and rates assessed to City parks and cemeteries and water used from the Golf Course Well #7; c. Revenues from the current culinary water user fees have typically been insufficient to cover the City's ongoing operations and maintenance needs for the water system. Historically this has required that the City subsidize the culinary water system, principally from wastewater treatment revenues or other City revenues; d. The City anticipates higher operations and maintenance costs as demands on the system increase and infrastructure ages; e. The City finds that it is necessary and appropriate that culinary water user fees pay for all of the ongoing operations and maintenance needs of the system; f. The City wishes to simplify the rate schedule where it is reasonable to do so, which is manifested here by removing the Firefighter and Bed and Breakfast rates from the schedule entirely. Firefighters will be assessed standard residential rates and Bed and Breakfasts will be assessed standard commercial rates; g• The City finds that it is necessary and appropriate that culinary water user fees be structured so as to encourage conservation and the efficient use of water; h. The City wishes to not inadvertently charge higher rates to residential customers who share a single water meter as of the date of this resolution; therefore, where multiple residences currently share a single water meter, the City Manager has discretion to apply either the commercial or the residential rate, based on an analysis of actual use and other information, if: 1) the standard residential rate would result in an unfair or inequitable charge; and 2) the modification would be fair to the other users of the system. i. The City has water rate setting authority pursuant to U.C.A. § io-8-14(2); and 1 Page 20 of 235 5-1 Public Hearing k. The City finds that the following rate structure is reasonable and consistent with the objectives and policies described above. Therefore, the City hereby enacts the culinary water rates in Schedule A, attached. The foregoing resolution is approved and adopted by action of the Moab City Council, as set forth below. This resolution shall take effect on January 9, 2o18. Mayor Emily S. Niehaus Date Attest: Rachel Stenta, Recorder Date 2 Page 21 of 235 5-1 Public Hearing Schedule A: Culinary Water Rates Rate Use fee: Residential, in City: First 2000 gallons (base charge): $10.00 3,000-10,00o gallons (per woo): $0.75 11,000-60,000 (per 1000): $1.00 61,00i+ (per l000): $1.25 Use fee: Commercial, in City First 2000 gallons (base charge): $25.00 3,000-5,000 gallons (per loon): $1.00 6,000-10,000 gallons (per l000): $1.50 11,000-50,00o gallons (per l000): $2.00 60,00o gallons + (per woo): $2.50 Use fee: Residential, out of City First 2000 gallons (base charge): $14.50 3,000-10,000 gallons (per loon): $1.00 11,000-60,000 (per 1000): $1.50 61,000+ (per woo): $1.75 Use fee: Commercial, out of City First 200o gallons (base charge): $29.50 3,000-5,000 gallons (per loon): $2.00 6,000-10,000 gallons (per l000): 2.25 11,000-50,00o gallons (per woo): $2.50 60,00o gallons + (per woo): $2.75 Connection fee: In City 5/8"x3/4" meter: $1840 1" meter: $2305 11/2" meter: $2485 2"meter: $2785 4"meter: $4555 Connection fee: Out of City 5/8"X3/4" meter: $1925 1" meter: $2045 1 1/2" meter: $2325 2" meter: $2965 4" meter: $4915 1 Page 22 of 235 Revised December 1, 2017 5-1 Public Hearing Industrial Water Use Fees (per woo g) Shop Water Retail Fee $7.75 Shop Water Government Fee $5.50 Construction Hydrant Fee $7.75 Miscellaneous Use Fees (per woo g) Fire Line Rate $11.24 City Parks and Cemeteries $0.54 Moab Golf Course Well #7 $0.54 2 Page 23 of 235 Revised December 1, 2017 5-1 Public Hearing / / AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 121 2017 / / Agenda item #: 7-1 Title: MRAC Purchase of Wibit Sports Modular Aquatic Play System Fiscal Impact: $16,605.00 Staff Presenter(s): Terry Lewis, MRAC Director Department: Recreation/MRAC Applicant: n/a III Background/Summary: The Wibit Sports modular aquatic play system is a configuration of inflatable components that comprise a floating obstacle course playground. This system has been designed using MRAC's pools' dimensions and can be reconfigured in different combinations to maximize use of the units in conjunction with existing play features. The system will provide a unique and attractive addition to the facility, adding variety to the MRAC's offerings and potentially increasing utilization and revenue. Recreonics, Inc. in Louisville, Kentucky is the North American sole source provider for Wibits pool equipment since 2014. Total cost of the product including shipping is $16.605.00. There is $20,000 budgeted for Wibits in this fiscal year's budget. There is a product from a company called Aflex Technologies, and they have similar products but don't have products that you can compare exactly. The prices are tough to compare since the products aren't the same, but the materials Wibit uses to make their products are made of higher quality PVC vinyl. Wibits also have a three year warranty on products where Aflex has a one year warranty. Wibits are the most used products of this kind, and there are 7 locations within Utah that used the pool products with the closest being Price. 1 Options: Approve or deny. Staff Recommendation: Click here to enter text. Recommended Motion: Click here to enter text. Attachment(s): Wibit design, system quote, sole source product confirmation Page 24 of 235 7-1 Consent Agenda wi�it the evolution of waterplay Recreonics Inc. Ctal 4200 Schmitt Avenue KY 40213 Louisville USA October 24, 2014 Wibit Sports / Recreonics - Sole Source Product Confirmation To Whom It May Concern, This letter is to confirm that the products from Wibit Sports are sole source products, manufactured, sold and distributed exclusively by Recreonics, Inc for the commercial public swimming pool market in the USA. No division of Recreonics, Inc., nor any other company, makes a similar or competing product. This product must be purchased directly by institutions from Recreonics, Inc. at the address listed above. There are no other agents or dealers authorized to represent this product for the commercial public pool market. Additionally, competition is precluded by the existence of an agreement with the manufacturer, who has given us an exclusive right to market this product for all commercial public swimming pools in the United States of America. There is no other like item(s) or product(s) available for purchase that would serve the same purpose or function from Wibit and there is only one price for the above names item(s) or product(s) because of exclusive distribution or marketing rights. If you desire additional information, do not hesitate to contact me at romannnwibitsports.com at any time or visit our website at www.wibitsports.com. Sincerely, Altriblt Wibit Sports GmbH r ut Baking 15 - 0-48395 %molt Fax *49 p.49 j 29� It /238 20 10 Romann Rademacher' .:.•.,.,,,ba,,,;„,„„ CEO Wibit Sports GmbH Handelsreglster!Commercial Register: r:[rl• l; A.GCcelteld HMIES5, 4 :1T, &:(1%) • - Ge r?,r, Geschatstithrer/CEO: 4'•44(J;T•i717v.310 0 ;'nertCinaL . . r g (1.1 `N71 l i 3 lf) 11! Pc-wn Raeor•ei by r,r F✓:: bi's�ur s,ar:: VAT-Nr. OE 812199236 Page 25 of 235 www.wibitsports•com 7-1 Consent Agenda RECREONICS, INC. 110-1/CIT1E TBB _`__ 4200 SCHMITT AVENUE Quote Reprint LOUISVILLE, KY 40213 _ (800) 428-3254 Quote # 663973 FAX (800) 428-0133 Customer# 459961 INTERNATIONAL (502) 458-5731 FAX (502) 458-9777 ecreonZCS. FED. I.D. # 61-1228501 pate 11/27/17 ur<: Your Aquatic Authority http://www.recreonics.com Page 1 Quoted 'Co: CITY OF MOAB/UT MOAB SWIM CENTER 217 E. CENTER MOAB, UT 84532 Ship To: CITY OF MOAB/UT MOAB SWIM CENTER 217 E. CENTER 1410AB, UT 84532 PO/REF # EXPIRES SLP SHIP VIA FREIGHT QUOTED BY 11/22/17 014 BEST PPD&BILL TOM BACON EXT 428 QUOTED TO: CT=435-259-8226 X=435-259-1135 E-Mail: TERRY LEWIS KT=435-259-8226 X= E-Mail: tlewis@moabcity.or8 LINE ITEM DESCRIPTION S/D QUANTITY UM PRICE UM EXTENSION 001 94856 WIBIT SLOPE (MODULAR) 002 94852 WIBIT CLIFF (MODULAR) 003 94988 WIBIT HURDLE (MODULAR) 004 94918 WIGGLE DISCS (SET OF 3) 005 94917 WIBIT WIGGLE BRIDGE START BLOCK (2 PIECES) 006 94935 WIBIT RODEO SLIDE (MODULAR) 007 94930 WIBIT STEP (MODULAR) 009 94919 WIBIT Y—CONNECT (INCLUDES (1) ANCHOR BUNGEE) 010 8002B FREIGHT & HDLG. TO BE PREPAID AND ADDED TO INVOICE D D D D D D D D S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA. 2395.00 2595.00 1695.00 1485.00 2300.00 2495.00 1295.00 1595.00 750.00 EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 2395.00 2595.00 1695.00 1485.00 2300.00 2495.00 1295.00 1595.00 750.00 I CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE age o opua6y 4uasuoT-L Recreonics Catalog No. 94-852 Cliff Item No 30014 Cliff Y Warranty min. water depth anchor plates user capacity 4 inflation time 7Tmn. modular Made from 32oz. 5-Layer PVC product weight ? abs Combine's speed, strength, and agility. Taking on this 'mountain' is more than a challenge. Try to hang on. Recreonics, Inc. (800) 4-R5431vww.recreonics.com .rcludes 2x Canneaor Strap 30' Ix Safety Flap ix Repair Pt 7-1 Consent Agenda item nu 30079 Hurdle rmn water depth Warranty 3'-ir anchor plates user capacity 2 Recreonics catalog No. 94-988 Hurdle inflation time 2 mirk modular Made from 32oz, 5-Layer PVC product weigt t 70ts Wibit brings hurdles to the water! Go over and under the bars or balance over them to cross this obstacle! It Is suitable for shallow water and therefore fits any location! ' } Recreonics, Inc. (800) 4243- n5WAvww.recreonics.com Inc kid-e 2x Connector Strap 30" 2 x Safety Flap ix Repair Kf t 7-1 Consent Agenda Item no. 30102-RodeoSlide m n water depth Warranty 5'-54 anchor plates user capacity 2 Recreonics Catalog No. 94-935 # od eoSl i d e inflation time 7rnux Feel like a cowboy on the water, this slide is more fun to ride than a real pony. " modular Made from 32oz. 5-Layer PVC product weiRk 1311',176 Recreonics, Inc. (800) 428- n031Arww.recreonlcs.com ,r:hides 2x Connector Strop 30- I x Safety Rap ! x Repair Ki t 7-1 Consent Agenda Item no. 30049 - Slope min water depth War•ardw anchor plates user capac ty 4 d! This steep slide 1s the perfect finish for an obstacle course! Are you going to make the climb? Recreonics Catalog No. 94-856 Slope inflation time 6 mkt. modular Made from 32oz. 5-Layer PVC product weight 99YbS Recreonics, Inc. (800) 4 3t5rfAvww.recreonics.com incomes 2x Connector Strop 30' ix Safety Flap ix Repair Mt 7-1 Consent Agenda Item no 30104 - Step min water depth Warranty .T-3 t anchor plates user capacity 2 Recreonics Catalog No, 94-990 Step inflation time 1 nirr, 11 Getting onto the pool combination is now easier than ever before and for everyone. To get on board takes literally only one Step. modular Made from 32oz. 5-Layer PVC product weight 571155 Recreonics, Inc. (BOO) 42E-R5Mroruw.recreonics.com �ncu;des 2x Connector Strap 30" Ix Safety Flap Ix Repair Kit 7-1 Consent Agenda Item,, 30068 - Wiggle Bridge 3 min water depth Warranty 3=I1` anchor plates RecreonicsCatalog No. 94.916 Wiggle Bridge 3 user capacity 7 inflation time T min. } r Didn't you ever dream about walking on water? With the Wibit Wiggle Bridge you can - if you are able to keep your balance! modular Made from 32oz. 5-Layer PVC product weight iiSts Recreonics, Inc. (800)-32543Uww.recreonics.com rtm..&s 2x Connector Strap 30" 1x Safety Flap 1x Repair Kit 7-1 Consent Agenda Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 #: 7-2 Title: Set Public Hearing Date for Proposed Waste Hauling Commercial Rate Changes Date Submitted: December 8, 2017 Staff Presenter: David Everitt Attachment(s): - Monument Waste Rate Change request - Solid Waste SSD proposed 2018 rates Recommended Motion: I move to hold a public hearing regarding the proposed waste hauling commercial rate changes on January 9, 2018. Background/Summary: The City of Moab contracts with Monument Waste to haul residential and commercial waste to the Grand County Solid Waste Special Service District's ("the District") landfills. The District is increasing its tipping fees at the Klondike Landfill in 2018, and Monument Waste requests that the City raise the rates for commercial pickup to cover that increase. The current contract with Monument Waste states in Section II(8): "Contractor may apply in writing for consideration of a special rate review should an unforeseen event or circumstance arise which jeopardizes the economic operations of the Contractor. A special rate review application may be considered at the option of the City if one or more of the following applies• b) Landfill tip fees change by more than 10 percent." And according to Section II(9): "A change in Contractor rates, pursuant to Section 8, above, shall be vested in the discretion of the City Council following a public hearing. At least 15 days prior to the public hearing, the Contractor shall submit to City staff complete and accurate Page 35 of 235 7-2 Consent Agenda financial data showing its operating costs, revenues, and rate of return for operations under this Contract...." Additional information and a draft resolution will accompany a presentation at the council meeting prior to the public hearing in January. Page 36 of 235 7-2 Consent Agenda IMIIlIONUMENT WASTE SERVICES November 15, 2017 Monument Waste Services respectfully requests a Special Rate Review to assist with recovering the proposed Klondike Landfill Disposal Fee increase for 2018. This fee increase represents a Government to Government Rate Change. Monument Waste will receive no beneficial financial upside from this Rate Review Request, this will simply cover the operational increase of the disposal cost pass-thru of the fee increase, solely related to the City of Moab Commercial and Residential Waste Stream directed to Klondike Landfill for Disposal. We have outlined our operational disposal increase below, both as a cost of revenue and % of revenue. The detail shows that the Klondike Landfill Fees will increase by 17.25%, which relates to a $32,400, or a 3.3% direct reduction in our operating revenue. We have attached a Proposed Commercial Price Sheet for your review. This rate sheet reflects increases in monthly container fees as related to volume used by each commercial customer, based on their ever changing seasonal service needs. Monument Waste Services (MWS) 2017 Operational Disposal Cost Data 2017 - TTM 2018 - Proposed City of Moab Commercial & Residential Disposal Volume (Tons) 6,480 6,480 Klondike Landfill Tipping Fee $ 29.00 $ 34.00 2018 - Per Ton Increase in Klondike Landfill Tipping Fee $ 5.00 2018 - % Increase in Klondike Landfill Tipping Fee 17.24% Annual Disposal Fees Paid by MWS related to City of Moab Tons $ 187,920 $ 220,320 2018 Increase in Klondike Landfill Tipping Fees from Moab Tons $ 32,400 Annual Revenue from City of Moab Franchise Agreement $ 985,702 $ 985,702 City of Moab Direct Disposal Cost $ 187,920 $ 220,320 Net Operating Revenue $ 797,782 $ 765,382 Net Operating % 80.9% 77.6% Reduction in Net Operating Revenue Reduction in Net Operating Revenue % (32,400) -3.3% Section II(8): "Contractor may apply in writing for consideration of a special rate review should an unforeseen event or circumstance arise which jeopardizes the economic operations of the Contractor. A special rate review application may be considered at the option of the City if one or more of the following applies:.....b) Landfill tip fees change by more than 10 percent." Section II(9): "A change in Contractor rates, pursuant to Section 8, above, shall be vested in the discretion of the City Council following a public hearing. At least 15 days prior to the public hearing, the Contractor shall submit to City staff complete and accurate financial data showing its operating costs, revenues, and rate of return for operations under this Contract...." Respectfully, Dan Kirkpatrick Monument Waste Services Page 37 of 235 7-2 Consent Agenda MONUMENTAllaiL WASTE SERVICES City of Moab - Proposed Residential and Commercial Price Sheet Days Per Week of Service Proposed - 2018 Retaainner Cont special Pickup 1-X 2-X 3-X 4-X S-X 6-X 7-X 2-YD -Trash $ 20 $ 30 $ 53 $ 93 $ 133 $ 173 $ 213 $ 253 $ 293 2nd Container City of Moab Franchise Commercial Container and Cart Services $ 106 $ 186 $ 266 $ 346 $ 426 $ 506 $ 586 3rd Container $ 159 $ 279 $ 399 $ 519 $ 639 $ 759 $ 879 j. 4th Container $ 212 $ 372 $ 532 $ 692 $ 852 $ 1,012 $ 1,172 5th Container $ 265 $ 465 $ 665 $ 865 $ 1,065 $ 1,265 $ 1,465 6th Container $ 318 $ 558 $ 798 $ 1,038 $ 1,278 $ 1,518 $ 1,758 City Residential ist Polycart 2nd Polycart (City} 2 X Week Polycart = $29 - Backdoor Service = additional $4 per Month Polycart Service $ 17 $ 23 Days Per Week of Service Current - 2017 Reload Container Special Pickup 1-X 2-X 3-X 4-X 5-X 6-X 7-X 2-YD -Trash $ 20 $ 30 $ 51 $ 91 $ 130 $ 166 $ 199 $ 214 $ 237 2nd Container City of Moab Franchise Commercial Container and Cart Services $ 102 $ 182 $ 260 $ 332 $ 398 $ 428 $ 474 3rd Container $ 153 $ 273 $ 390 $ 498 $ 597 $ 642 $ 711 4th Container $ 204 $ 364 $ 520 $ 664 $ 796 $ 856 $ 948 5th Container $ 255 $ 455 $ 650 $ 830 $ 995 $ 1,070 $ 1,185 6th Container $ 306 $ 546 $ 780 $ 996 $ 1,194 $ 1,284 $ 1,422 City Residential 1st Polycart 2nd Polycart (may} 2 X Week Polycart = $29 - Backdoor Service = additional $4 per Month Polycart Service $ 17 $ 23 Proposed Incremental Price Changes by Day's of Service and Quantity of Containers $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 7 $ 14 $ 39 $ 56 $ 4 $ 4 $ 6 $ 14 $ 28 $ 78 $ 112 $ 6 $ 6 $ 9 $ 21 $ 42 $ 117 $ 168 $ 8 $ 8 $ 12 $ 28 $ 56 $ 156 $ 224 $ 10 $ 10 $ 15 $ 35 $ 70 $ 195 $ 280 $ 12 $ 12 $ 18 $ 42 $ 84 $ 234 $ 336 No change in 2018 Residential Pricing - Current Monthly Flat Rates will remain in place SSWD #1- District is proposing a 17.24% increase is disposal fee's at Klondike Landfill for their 2018 Budget Given the complexity of the city's rate and billing structure it will be difficult to assess an even rate amongst all residential and commercial users. My suggestion would be to change the commercial dumpster price sheet to accommodate the disposal increase, traditionally the commercial users are the bulk of the volume/weight of your waste stream given the high seasonality of the commercial base in tl-k tourist atmosphere with the heavy hotel, campgrounds and restaurant waste. With this method of prig increase process it would reflect the usage more evenly as commercial customers increase and decreas service based on the seasonality of their business, as their volumes increase, our trash weight increases and therefore they are paying their way as their business needs change. 0 Q V) 0 v N Page 38 of 235 Prepared by Dan Kirkpatrick - Monument Waste Services '17 SOLID WASTE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT #I PO Box 980, Moab, UT 84532 2018 FEE SCHEDULE DRAFT PROPOSED KLONDIKE CLASS I LANDFILL Material Tse Unit Municipal Solid Waste (Trash) Ton Contaminated Soils Cubic Yard Biosolids (Sludge) * Cubic Yard Waste (Brown or Yellow) Grease (based on 7.5 Gallons pounds/gallon) Equipment Usage Fee Per Load $ 50.00 The overtime fee will not be charged in 2017 but will be open for discussion for the 2018 fee schedule. Feem er Unit $34.00 $12.00 $ 12.00 $ 0.09 +d6.,06tie✓'7-€30`..- MOAB CLASS IVb LANDFILL/COMPOST Material Type link Fee per Unit Construction Demolition Debris Cubic Yard $12.00 Yard Waste (Leaves, Limbs, Vegetative, etc.) (No Cubic Yard $8.00 Debris) Minimum Fee (approximately .55 cy Cubic Yard/Each $5.00 Compost (finished)— when available Cubic Yard $30.00 Mulch/Chipped Wood — when available Cubic Yard $15.00 Tires (Less than or equal to 16.5") Each $3.00 Tires (Greater than 16.5" but not semi- Each $9.00 truck/equipment) Tires (Equipment/Semi-truck) Each $15.00 Tires (minimum 1 cubic yard) Cubic Yard $20.00 Equipment Usage Fee Per Load $50.00 NO Appliances, household trash, cardboard, contaminated soils, etc. Unsecured Loads may be charged double disposal fee. Landfill Charges for cleanup: 1.5 times the hourly rate for employee, equipment and other csots minimum fee is $50. Moab Landfill will be closed on Wednesday and Sunday. RECYCLE CENTER Residential Sponsorship Decals/fags (annual tag) Gold Silver Bronze Commercial Recycling Corrugated Cardboard (Loose = 100 Ibs/cy) Corrugated Cardboard (Bale = .5 tons/bale) Electronic Waste/Recycling Fluorescent Light Bulbs Four foot Length (4') Eight foot Length (8') Household bulbs ( Per decal Per decal Per decal Per Cubic Yard Per Bale Per pound $360.00 $240.00 $120.00 $5.00 S2.00 $0.30 Per each $2.00 Per each $4.00 Per each $1.00 NO appliances, NO large metal, NO automotive/lead-acid batteries SPECIAL EVENTS Actual charges imposed by hazardous waste vendors may be passed on to consumers/generators such as small quantity hazardous waste generators. SPRING/FALL CLEANUPIVOUCHER PROGRAMS Prices and projects will be negotiated based upon Klondike and Moab disposal fees for community sponsored cleanups. Page 39 of 235 7-2 Consent Agenda SOLID WASTE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT #1 PO Box 980, Moab, UT 84532 2017 FEE SCHEDULE - APPROVED 21 DECEMBER 2016 KLONDIKE CLASS I LANDFILL material Type pi& Lee per Unit Municipal Solid Waste (Trash) Ton $29.00 Contaminated Soils Cubic Yard $10,00 Blaso[ids (Sludge) * Cubic Yard $ I0.00 Waste (Brown or Yellow) Grease (based on 7.5 Gallons $ 0.08 pounds/gal lon) Equipment Usage Fee Per Load $ 50.00 The overtime fee will not be charged in 2017 but will be open for discussion for the 2018 fee schedule. MOAB CLASS IVb LANDFILL/COMPOST Material Type Unit Fee per Unit Construction Demolition Debris Cubic Yard $10.00 Yard Waste (Leaves, Limbs, Vegetative, etc.) (No Cubic Yard $7.00 Debris) Minimum Fee (approximately .55 cy Cubic Yard/Each $5.00 Compost (finished) — when available Cubic Yard $30.00 Mulch/Chipped Wood — when available Cubic Yard $15.00 Tires (Less than or equal to 16.5") Each $3.00 Tires (Greater than 16.5" but not semi- Each $9.00 truck/equipment) Tires (Equipment/Semi-truck) Each $15.00 Tires (Greater than 10 per load) Cubic Yard $I5.00 Equipment Usage Fee Per Load $50.00 1 Note: approximately 10 pax/pick-up tires equals 1 cubic yard NO Appliances, household trash, cardboard, contaminated soils, etc. Unsecured Loads may be charged double disposal fee. Landfill Charges for cleanup: 1.5 times the hourly rate for employee and equipment rates, minimum fee is $50. Moab Landfill will be closed on Wednesday beginning in January 2017. RECYCLE CENTER Commercial Recycling Corrugated Cardboard (Loose = I00 Ibs/cy) Per Cubic Yard $4.00 Corrugated Cardboard (Bale = .5 tons/bale) Per Bale $2,Q0 Electronic Waste/Recycling Bulk OR Per pound $0.30 Monitors/Televisions (Less than 30 inch Per each $15.00 Monitors/Televisions (30 inches or more) Per each $25.00 Desktop Printers/Faxes/Scanners Per each $5.00 Batteries (Non automotive) Per pound $0.30 Fluorescent Light Bulbs Four foot Length (4') Per each $2.00 Eight foot Length (8') Per each $4.00 Household bulbs ( Per each $I.00 Batteries (Rechargeable) No charge NO appliances, NO large metal, NO automotive/lead-acid batteries SPECIAL EVENTS Actual charges imposed by hazardous waste vendors may be passed on to consumers/generators such as small quantity hazardous waste generators. SPRING/FALL CLEANUPNOUCHER PROGRAMS Prices and projects will be negotiated based upon Klondike and Moab disposal fees for community sponsored cleanups. Page 40 of 235 7-2 Consent Agenda Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 #: 7-3 Title: Sidewalk Trip Hazard Repair Bid Award Date Submitted: Nov. 21, 2017 Staff Presenter: Pat Dean, Public Works Director Attachment(s): - Precision Concrete Cutting Proposal - Map showing area of concentration - Sole source Patten letter from Precision Concrete Cutters. Options: Approve, Deny, or Modify. Recommended Motion: "I move to award the bid for the Sidewalk Trip Hazard Repair Proposal from Precision Concrete Cutting for the amount not to exceed $25,000". Background/Summary: The City of Moab has been working with Precision Concrete Cutting for the past 6 years, using their patented equipment and process to complete concrete repairs necessary to keep the city in compliance with the ADA requirements. The proposal breakdown is as follows: Number of trip hazards to be repaired: 340 to 400 Total length to be cut: between 2,000- 2,500 linear feet This program has been in place in our city for quite a while and has served the city of Moab well. Keeping the City of Moab's sidewalks safe from trip hazards, make us a more pedestrian friendly community. Having this program in place could help defend us from possible litigation cost. This Hazard repair process allows the city to stay on top of many of the trip hazards helping us to provide a safe environment for our visitors and citizens. Page 41 of 235 7-3 Consent Agenda Page 42 of 235 Page 43 of 235 Page 44 of 235 Page 45 of 235 Page 46 of 235 Page 47 of 235 Page 48 of 235 Page 49 of 235 Page 50 of 235 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: Dec 27, 2017 #: 7-4 Title: Approval of Dorsett Technologies proposal to furnish and install New Culinary Water SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) System. Date Submitted: Dec. 14, 2017 Staff Presenter: Pat Dean, Public Works Director Attachment(s): Dorsett Technologies proposal for the purchase, installation and ongoing support for a new SCADA system for the City of Moab Culinary Water Dept. Copy of the RFP and Bid opening results sheet. Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: I move to allow the Public Works Water Department to enter into a contract with Dorsett Technologies in the amount$ 150,000.00 for the purchase and installation of a new SCADA system for the City of Moab's Culinary Water System $ 137,892.60 System Cost and$ 12,107.40 for contingency, for total cost not to exceed$ 150,000.00. Background/Summary: The Public Works Department started the selection process with a RFP (Request for Proposals) on October 5th, followed by a Mandatory Pre-Proposal Meeting/Site visit on October 18th, 2017. There were in excess of 20 individuals that attended the mandatory meeting and site visit. There was a request to provide another date for an additional walk through of the SCAD A sites, which was scheduled for the z3rd of October 2017. Levi Jones and Pat Dean facilitated the additional walk through for about 4 company representatives that showed for the extra tour. Final questions and responses where published on the 27th of October Proposals were received by the City Recorders Office and opened after the 3:00 P.M. deadline on the 3rd of November. There were a total of 8 companies that submitted proposals for consideration. These proposals ranges in price from$ 268,300 to$ 93,270.21 (see attached Bid Opening Form). All proposals were reviewed and scored by Levi Jones, Water Dept. Superintendent, Chuck Page 51 of 235 Page 52 of 235 Page 53 of 235 Page 54 of 235 Page 55 of 235 Page 56 of 235 Page 57 of 235 Page 58 of 235 Page 59 of 235 Page 60 of 235 Page 61 of 235 Page 62 of 235 Page 63 of 235 Page 64 of 235 Page 65 of 235 Page 66 of 235 Page 67 of 235 Page 68 of 235 Page 69 of 235 Page 70 of 235 Page 71 of 235 Page 72 of 235 Page 73 of 235 Page 74 of 235 Page 75 of 235 Page 76 of 235 Page 77 of 235 Page 78 of 235 Page 79 of 235 Page 80 of 235 Page 81 of 235 Page 82 of 235 Page 83 of 235 Page 84 of 235 Page 85 of 235 Page 86 of 235 Page 87 of 235 Page 88 of 235 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 #: 7-5 Title: 500 West Public Utility Easement and Agreement Date Submitted: December 8, 2017 Staff Presenter(s): Pat Dean, Public Works Director Attachments: - Easement agreements Recommended Motion: I move to approve the three (3) Agreements for the purpose of providing Utility Services to the three (3) properties described therein. Background/Summary: Currently there are three (3) individual waste water ejection pumps that were put into operation about 2012. The three residents are located in the 500 North block of 500 West Street, (AKA) Vaughn Property , Tejada Property and the Ewell Property. Currently the property owners are paying for the Electricity to operate the pumps that handle the waste water from their respective household units. Due to a conflict with alignment of existing utilities, the gravity sewer connections were not able to be reinstalled following the reconstruction of 500 West street. For a solution the sewer lines from these three properties were converted over to a individual waste water pressure ejection pump system, and Easements were not followed through with following the construction of and conversion to these pressurized waste water ejection systems.. These are the easements that will be used as instruments that will allow the city to fulfill our responsibility and or therefore obligation to protect the current and possible future property owners, and allow us access to the property necessary to maintain these small systems. This easement will allow the city to contract to have the electricity switched over to a new service that the city will pay for from now on, and allow us the utility easement that is necessary to perform current and future maintenance on these waste water ejection pump systems and the utilities that it takes to make these pumps work. Page 89 of 235 Page 90 of 235 Page 91 of 235 Page 92 of 235 Page 93 of 235 Page 94 of 235 Page 95 of 235 Page 96 of 235 Page 97 of 235 Page 98 of 235 Page 99 of 235 Page 100 of 235 Page 101 of 235 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: November 14, 2017 #: 8‐2 Title: Storm Water Master Plan Date Submitted: November 1, 2017 Staff Presenter: Chuck Williams, City Engineer Attachment(s): Moab Storm Water Master Plan (October 2017) Options: Adopt, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: I move to adopt the “Moab Storm Water Master Plan (October 2017)” Background/Summary: The Storm Water Master Plan (Master Plan) for the City of Moab (City) presents solutions to manage and regulate storm water runoff and to help mitigate flooding and environmental impacts. The master plan will educate developers, private property owners, City staff, and elected officials regarding the capability and needs of the City’s storm water system. The master plan examines the existing storm drainage system. Existing deficiencies are identified and the preferred solution alternatives are presented with conceptual cost estimates. A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is developed with master plan projects. Computer models were prepared as part of the master plan to simulate runoff during storm events in the City. The models were also used to determine solutions to system deficiencies. The City of Moab selected Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc. (HAL) to prepare the Storm Water Master Plan. The master plan has been completed in accordance with the agreement between the City of Moab and HAL from September 2015. The master plan was completed under the direction of, and in cooperation with, City staff. Page 102 of 235 CITY OF MOAB STORM WATER MASTER PLAN (HAL Project No.: 380.04.100) October 2017 Page 103 of 235 Page 104 of 235 City of Moab i Storm Water Master Plan ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Several individuals contributed to the successful completion of this study. We sincerely appreciate the cooperation, assistance, and expertise provided by members of the project team: The City of Moab Patrick Dean – Public Works Director Jeff Reinhart – City Planner Chuck Williams – City Engineer Phillip Bowman – Former City Engineer (Through Feb. 2017) Eric Johanson – Assistant City Engineer Mark Jolissaint – Assistant City Engineer Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc. Joseph G. Hawkes Gordon L. Jones Benjamin D. Miner Michael C. Price Alex Narteh Page 105 of 235 City of Moab ii Storm Water Master Plan ABBREVIATIONS AND UNITS ac acre ac-ft acre-foot cfs cubic foot per second (ft3/s) CIP Capital Improvement Plan CMP corrugated metal pipe E east EPA US Environmental Protection Agency FF Farmer–Fletcher (1971) storm distribution ft foot GBEA Great Basin Experimental Area GIS geographic information system HAL Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc. HEC Hydrologic Engineering Center (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) HMS Hydrologic Modeling System ID identification in. inch irr irrigation mi mile N north NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NRCS National Resources Conservation Service (formerly SCS) RR railroad s second S south SCS Soil Conservation Service (now NRCS) SWMM Storm Water Management Model TR-55 Technical Release 55 (NRCS 1986) USGS U.S. Geological Survey W west w/ with w/o without xing crossing yr year Page 106 of 235 City of Moab iii Storm Water Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. i ABBREVIATIONS AND UNITS ................................................................................................. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................iii CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1-1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 1-1 AUTHORIZATION ............................................................................................................... 1-1 STUDY AREAS ................................................................................................................... 1-1 CHAPTER 2 – EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM ...................................................... 2-1 NATURAL DRAINAGES ...................................................................................................... 2-1 Colorado River ................................................................................................................. 2-1 Mill Creek ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 Pack Creek ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES ........................................................................................ 2-1 Collection and Conveyance .............................................................................................. 2-1 Detention ......................................................................................................................... 2-2 CHAPTER 3 – METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 3-1 HYDROLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 Design Frequencies ......................................................................................................... 3-1 Design Storms ................................................................................................................. 3-1 DEVELOPMENT OF THE HYDROLOGIC MODELS ........................................................... 3-2 Subbasin Area ................................................................................................................. 3-2 Hydrologic Soil Group ...................................................................................................... 3-2 Land Use ......................................................................................................................... 3-3 Impervious Area ............................................................................................................... 3-3 SCS Curve Number ......................................................................................................... 3-4 Lag Time .......................................................................................................................... 3-5 HYDRAULICS ..................................................................................................................... 3-6 Links ................................................................................................................................ 3-6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 3-6 DESIGN FLOW RATES ....................................................................................................... 3-7 CHAPTER 4 – STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS .................................................................... 4-1 CRITERIA............................................................................................................................ 4-1 DEFICIENCIES ................................................................................................................... 4-1 MINIMUM CONVEYANCE SIZE .......................................................................................... 4-7 CHAPTER 5 – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN .................................................................. 5-1 PREFERRED DRAINAGE PLAN DEVELOPMENT ............................................................. 5-1 PRECISION OF COST ESTIMATES ................................................................................... 5-1 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS ............................................................................. 5-2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ........................................................................................ 5-2 FACILITY OWNERSHIP .................................................................................................... 5-14 STEWART CANYON COST SHARING ............................................................................. 5-14 SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................... 5-15 OPERATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 5-15 Page 107 of 235 City of Moab iv Storm Water Master Plan Minimum Pipe Diameter ................................................................................................. 5-15 Inventory ........................................................................................................................ 5-15 Irrigation and Storm Drain Conveyances ........................................................................ 5-15 Watch and Maintenance Recommendations .................................................................. 5-15 Storm Water Quality Management Plan ......................................................................... 5-16 Storm Water Master Plan Updates ................................................................................. 5-16 CHAPTER 6 – STORM WATER QUALITY ............................................................................ 6-1 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 6-1 Public Education and Outreach on Storm Water Impacts ................................................. 6-1 Public Involvement/Participation ....................................................................................... 6-2 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) ............................................................ 6-2 Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control ................................................................. 6-3 Long-Term Storm Water Management in New Development and Redevelopment (Post- Construction Storm Water Management) ......................................................................... 6-4 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations .......................... 6-6 Reviewing and Updating SWMPs ..................................................................................... 6-7 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... R-1 APPENDIX A - Electronic GIS Data APPENDIX B - Detention Basin Data APPENDIX C - Precipitation Data APPENDIX D - Typical Lots Data APPENDIX E - Cost Information LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 NOAA Atlas 14 Moab Rainfall Depths .............................................................. 3-2 Table 3-2 Hydrologic Land Uses in Moab ........................................................................ 3-3 Table 3-3 Vegetative Condition Definitions ...................................................................... 3-4 Table 3-4 Land Use Characteristics ................................................................................. 3-5 Table 4-1 Storm Drainage Deficiencies ............................................................................ 4-2 Table 5-1 Capital Improvement Plan ................................................................................ 5-3 Table 5-2 Capital Improvement Plan Summary .............................................................. 5-15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Study Area and Subbasin Delineation ...................................................... After 1-1 Figure 2-1 Existing System ....................................................................................... After 2-1 Figure 3-1 SCS Type II 24-hour Distribution ...................................................................... 3-1 Figure 3-2 Soil Types ................................................................................................ After 3-3 Figure 3-3 Land Use ................................................................................................. After 3-3 Figure 3-4 Vegetative Condition ................................................................................ After 3-4 Figure 3-5 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria (inlets, laterals, & minor lines).................. After 3-7 Figure 4-1 Identified Deficiencies .............................................................................. After 4-7 Figure 4-2 Minimum Conveyance Sizes .................................................................... After 4-7 Figure 5-1 Capital Improvement Plan ...................................................................... After 5-13 Page 108 of 235 City of Moab 1-1 Storm Water Master Plan CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION PURPOSE This Storm Water Master Plan (Master Plan) for the City of Moab (City) presents solutions to manage and regulate storm water runoff and to help mitigate flooding and environmental impacts. The master plan will educate developers, private property owners, City staff, and elected officials regarding the capability and needs of the City’s storm water system. The master plan examines the existing storm drainage system. Existing deficiencies are identified and the preferred solution alternatives are presented with conceptual cost estimates. A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is developed with master plan projects. Computer models were prepared as part of the master plan to simulate runoff during storm events in the City. The models were also used to determine solutions to system deficiencies. BACKGROUND Located along the southern edge of Grand County, Utah, the City of Moab extends from the Colorado River south along the Spanish Valley. The terrain has a vertical relief of approximately 1,000 ft from the surrounding mesas to the Colorado River on the northwest side of the City. Soil types range from permeable desert sands to exposed sandstone formations. Land use varies from urban developments to farmland and desert landscapes. The City was incorporated in 1902 and traditionally relied on mining as the major economic activity. Growth in the City was directly tied to boom and bust cycles of the mining industry. In the 1980s efforts were made to promote Moab as a tourist destination and diversify the economic landscape. Moab had an estimated population of 5,200 in 2014. In an ongoing effort dealing with growth and unique desert watersheds, the City desires to plan an effective drainage system to manage nuisance water and prevent flooding. AUTHORIZATION The City of Moab selected Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc. (HAL) to prepare the Storm Water Master Plan. The master plan has been completed in accordance with the agreement between the City of Moab and HAL from September 2015. The master plan was completed under the direction of, and in cooperation with, City staff. STUDY AREAS The study area for the master plan includes the incorporated area of Moab and the surrounding mesas. Approximately 5,620 acres were hydrologically modeled to determine the runoff tributary to the City’s storm drainage system. The modeled subbasins representing the study area as well as the City boundaries are shown on Figure 1-1. Page 109 of 235 MAIN STU S 1 91400 N500 WHWY128MILLC R E E K D R 200 SKANECREEKBLVDCENTER STSPANISHVA L L E Y D R U S 1 9 1 200 SCity of MoabStorm Water Master PlanStudy Area andSubbasin DelineationFIGURE1-1LegendMoab City BoundariesSubbasins02,200 4,4001,100Feet¦Document Path: H:\Projects\380 - Moab City\04.100 - storm water master plan\GIS\Figures\Figure1_1StudyArea_new.mxdDate: 7/21/2017Page 110 of 235 City of Moab 2-1 Storm Water Master Plan CHAPTER 2 – EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM This section discusses the features that make up the storm drainage facilities in Moab. Figure 2- 1 shows the existing storm drainage system including the natural drainages that act as outfalls for the system. NATURAL DRAINAGES The City of Moab discharges storm runoff into three different natural drainages which generally flow from southeast to northwest. Colorado River The Colorado River is the largest natural drainage in the study area and is the final outlet for all storm runoff from the City. The Colorado River runs from northeast to southwest on the far west side of the City. Mill Creek Mill Creek originates in the La Sal Mountains east of Moab and terminates where it meets the Colorado River. Pack Creek Pack Creek originates in the La Sal Mountains east of Moab and terminates where it meets Mill Creek near 100 South and 100 West. STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES As part of this master plan, efforts were made to survey the storm drainage facilities in Moab. HAL staff performed a survey of over 700 points representing inlets, manholes, culverts, detention basins, ditches and select topographical features during October 2015. The survey was linked to an existing GIS database provided by the City of Moab to provide manhole identification numbers and associated information with the points. City staff then performed an inventory on approximately 570 manholes and inlets to collect the depths to the invert elevation of the manhole (measure downs), pipe diameters, and connectivity information. The information gathered from the survey is included electronically in Appendix A. Some pipe diameters and measure down depths were not able to be determined by City staff due to facility accessibility and some points were not able to be surveyed due to interference from foliage. Therefore, lack of data necessitate that some simplifying assumptions were made to create the model. Junctions and links with estimated values are identified in the GIS inventory. Although the inventory provided in this master plan is mostly complete, ongoing efforts should be made to continue to update and refine the inventory. Collection and Conveyance The City of Moab has over 18 miles of buried storm drain conveyances with a wide range of sizes from 72 inches to less than 12 inches. The City has an estimated 724 inlets that introduce runoff into the storm drains. The storm drain system also relies on natural drainages, roadside swales, and curb and gutters to convey runoff to the Colorado River. Page 111 of 235 MillCreekPackCreek ColoradoRiver30''60''24''42''99''48''36''28''72''21''12''8''6''18''1 0 ''15''18''24''6''18''2 4 ''30''24''6''15''12''24''15''2 4 ''12''30''2 4 ''1 2 ''30''24''15''18''18''12''24''10''3 6 ''6''24''1 5 ''36''30''30''24''18''30''4 2 ''48''1 2 ''24''24''18''15''60''24''18''36''12''1 5 '' 7 2 ''24''36''30''30''36''4 2 ''24''18''24''18''30''15''15''1 8 ''30''24''15''24''18''1 8 ''48''2 4 ''60''12''1 5 ''24''24''18''15''36''18''18''1 8 ''12''18''36''42''18''24''30''30''1 8 ''30''24''24''12''1 8 ''15''6''24''10''60''24''3 6 ''18''30''6 0 ''24''24''1 8 ''18''3 6 ''30''24''24''36''2 4 ''12''6''12''30''8''24''15''24 ''18''8''1 8 ''8''15''30''12''30''30''2 4 ''30''24''12''15''18''30''12''60''24''8''36''18''36''18''30''30''2 4 ''15''30''24''3 6 ''24''4 8 ''24''2 4 ''30''30''1 2 ''24''3 0''12''1 2 ''18''36''18''24''18''18''8''24''24''10''12''18''18''36''30''36''36''30''18''24''1 8 ''36''42''1 5 ''15''30''30''1 8 ''18''30''1 8 ''24''18''2 4''24''24''24''48''36''36''12''12''24''MAIN STU S 1 9 1 500 WMILLC R E E K D R 200 SHWY128City of MoabStorm Water Master PlanExisting SystemFIGURE2-1LegendKJDetention BasinUnknown ConveyanceDitchPipeSquashed PipeNatural WashWaterwayNatural Drainage02,2004,4001,100Feet¦Document Path: H:\Projects\380 - Moab City\04.100 - storm water master plan\GIS\Figures\Figure2_1ExistingSystem_new.mxdDate: 7/21/2017HWY 128U S 1 9 1 M AIN ST0''12''24''42''48''21''36''18''15''12''24''24''24''18''36''24''24''24''24''1 8 ''1 8 ''24''1 8 ''12''1 2 ''18''42''1 8 ''24''24''1 8 '' 18''18''1 8 ''1 8 ''30''18''6''8 '' 2 4 ''30''30''1 8 ''400 N15''18''18''18''18''24''24''24''24''24''24''C o lo ra d o R iv e rColorado RiverPage 112 of 235 City of Moab 2-2 Storm Water Master Plan Data compiled in the system inventory consist of locations, descriptions, elevations, and measure down depths at each point, as well as location, shape, offset, type, and size for each conveyance. The collection and conveyance system with associated pipe diameters can be seen on Figure 2-1. Detention The City maintains several detention facilities. Stage storage curves for the detention basins were estimated using the contour data provided by the City. Invert elevations, maximum elevations, and spill elevations were determined from the survey. Some detention basins were not modeled because basin attributes could not be determined from available information or the small size of the detention basin made it insignificant for master planning purposes. Also, some detention basins lacked information about the orifice size. The modeled detention basins can be seen on Figure 2-1. More information on the detention basins is available in Appendix B. Page 113 of 235 City of Moab 3-1 Storm Water Master Plan CHAPTER 3 – METHODOLOGY The project team adopted a workshop approach with City staff to determine the design criteria, study areas, analysis processes, deficiencies, alternatives, and solutions. This section describes the methodology followed in developing the master plan. HYDROLOGY Design Frequencies The City selected design storm frequencies of 10-year (10% chance of being equaled or exceed in any given year) and 100-year (1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year) for this study. The criteria selected by the City correspond with storm drainage design criteria for Grand County. Criteria include: 10-year design capacity for the initial drainage system. The initial drainage system includes inlets, laterals, minor trunk lines, gutters, and roadside ditches. 100-year capacity where flooding of homes may occur. 100-year capacity on major detention/retention, culverts and major conveyance facilities (limited to storm drain hydraulic capacities of the upstream initial drainage system). Design Storms Storm distributions used in this master plan were derived from the SCS Type II distribution for 24-hour storms. The SCS Type II distribution can be seen on Figure 3-1. Figure 3-1 SCS Type II 24-hour Distribution 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 0:00 Cumulative Rainfall/Total RainfallIncremental Rainfall/Total RainfallTime Incremental Rainfall Ratio Cumulative Rainfall Ratio Page 114 of 235 City of Moab 3-2 Storm Water Master Plan Precipitation depths were obtained from NOAA Atlas 14 Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates (NOAA, 2016). The design storm rainfall depths for the City are seen in Table 3-1. Only the 24-hour storms were modeled. Additional rainfall information is in Appendix C. Table 3-1 NOAA Atlas 14 Moab Rainfall Depths Storm Frequency 1-hr 3-hr 6-hr 12-hr 24-hr 10-year Rainfall Amount (in)* 0.71 0.94 1.11 1.33 1.71 100-year Rainfall Amount (in)* 1.36 1.88 1.97 2.18 2.96 *All rainfall amounts are from NOAA Atlas 14. DEVELOPMENT OF THE HYDROLOGIC MODELS As part of the master plan, HAL developed a computer model for the study area to simulate runoff during storm events. Autodesk’s Storm and Sanitary Analysis (SSA) was used to model the storm drainage system. SSA utilizes the EPA’s Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) for hydraulic modeling, while the HEC-1 method was utilized for hydrologic modeling. The model is capable of simulating rainfall, determining runoff, and hydraulically routing the runoff through a gravity driven conveyance network. A drainage basin, also called a subbasin, watershed or catchment, is an area in which all rainfall or snowmelt runoff will collect to a common point (the lowest point in the basin). Drainage basin boundaries depend upon both the topography and the location of storm drainage facilities. Subbasin characteristics developed for this plan were based on field observation, aerial imagery, soil data, GIS mapping, land use information from the City, and engineering literature. Important subbasin characteristics described below include 1) area, 2) hydrologic soil group, 3) percentage of impervious area, 4) SCS curve number, and 5) Lag time. Much of the methodology is documented in Technical Release 55: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (NRCS, 1986), hereafter referred to as TR-55 and also in Lag Time Characteristics for Small Watersheds in the U.S. (Simas and Hawkins, 2002). Subbasin Area The amount of runoff is proportional to the area of the subbasin. Subbasin boundaries depend upon both topography and location of storm drainage facilities. Subbasin boundaries were delineated using the following data sources: A five meter digital elevation model (DEM) from the Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC), contour data provided by the City, survey data collected in October 2015, aerial imagery from the AGRC, USGS Topographic Mapping, and Google Earth. Hydrologic Soil Group The hydrologic soil group is a general indication of a soil’s infiltration capacity and is a key determinant of runoff behavior. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has classified soils into four hydrologic groups: A, B, C, and D. Soils of group A have the highest infiltration rate and therefore produce the least amount of runoff. Group A soils include permeable gravels and well-drained sands. Group B soils have moderate infiltration rates and moderately fine or coarse textures. Developed portions of each study area were assumed to have a minimum of nonnative group B soils to represent the desert landscaping common on developed parcels. Group C soils have a lower infiltration rate and finer textures, sometimes Page 115 of 235 City of Moab 3-3 Storm Water Master Plan with a layer that impedes infiltration. Soils of group D have the lowest infiltration rate and produce the highest amount of runoff. Group D soils include fine silts, fine clays, and other soils with low infiltration rates. Soil groups are described in TR-55 (NRCS, 1986). Soil data were retrieved from the Natural Resource Conservation Service’s (NRCS) Web Soil Survey. Some map units defined in the soil data required the use of the Soil Survey of Grand County to determine corresponding curve numbers (Soil Conservation Service, 1989). Group A soils are the most prevalent in the City. A soil map of the City is shown in Figure 3-2. The hydrologic soil group is a factor used to determine the curve number for each subbasin. Land Use A GIS shapefile showing the designated land uses for the City was provided by Moab. This shapefile was modified with a parcel shapefile in order to develop a land use designation based on similar hydrologic characteristics. Table 3-2 shows the various land uses implemented in this master plan. The various land uses can also be seen on Figure 3-3. Table 3-2 Hydrologic Land Uses in Moab Land Use Type Description Agriculture Open crop fields, pasture, some outbuildings Commercial General commercial lots, parking lots, buildings Mobile Home Mobile home parks Open Space Undeveloped open space Parks Cultivated parks with good cover and irrigated landscaping Residential (0.25 acres) Residential lots from 0.08 to 0.5 acres Residential (0.75 acres) Residential lots from 0.5 to 1 acres Residential (1 acre) Residential lots larger than 1 acre Residential Portions of the other residential lots (average attributes of all other residential lots) Streets Street, curb and gutter, park strip, sidewalk, and right-of-way space Vacant Lots Undeveloped lots in areas likely to be developed Yards (Storage) Open storage lots, junk yards, salvage yards Impervious Area Impervious areas within each subbasin were estimated using the type of land uses within each subbasin. There are two types of impervious area: directly connected impervious areas and unconnected impervious areas. Directly connected impervious areas provide a direct path for runoff to a conveyance such as a pipe, gutter, or channel. Directly connected impervious areas often include roadways, parking lots, driveways, and roofs. Runoff from unconnected impervious areas must cross a pervious area before reaching the drainage node for the subbasin. Examples of unconnected impervious areas include sidewalks that are not adjacent to the curb, patios, sheds, and usually some portion of house roofs. It is important to distinguish between directly connected and unconnected impervious areas. Runoff from the directly connected impervious areas reaches the drainage conveyance system Page 116 of 235 M A I N S T 400 N 500 WHW Y 1 2 8 MIL L C R EEKDRUS 1 9 1200 S S PANI SHV A L L EYDRKANE C R E EKBLVD CENTER ST US 1 9 1 200 S FIGURE 3-2City of Moab - Storm Water Master Plan Soil Types 0 3,500 7,0001,750 Feet ¦ Legend Study Area Other Map Units A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils Water Document Path: H:\Projects\380 - Moab City\04.100 - storm water master plan\GIS\Figures\Figure3_2SoilTypes2_new.mxdDate: 7/21/2017Other Map Units are made up of the Myton, Rizno, and Moenkopie rock outcrops as well as the Rizno Dry Complex and Ustic Torripsamments units. Page 117 of 235 MAIN STU S 19 1 HWY 128400 N500 WM ILLC R E E K D R 200 SKANECREEKBLVDCENTER STSPANISHVAL L E Y D R U S 1 9 1 200 SCity of MoabStorm Water Master PlanLand UseFIGURE3-3LegendStudy AreaAgricultureCommercialMobile HomeOpen SpaceParksResidential (0.25 acres)Residential (0.75 acres)Residential (1 acre)ResidentialStreetsVacant LotsYards (Storage)02,200 4,4001,100Feet¦Document Path: H:\Projects\380 - Moab City\04.100 - storm water master plan\GIS\Figures\Figure3_3LandUse.mxdDate: 7/21/2017Page 118 of 235 City of Moab 3-4 Storm Water Master Plan quickly and usually determines the magnitude of the peak flow rate. Impervious areas such as backyard patios which drain to grassed or landscaped areas have less impact on peak runoff. Unconnected impervious area for residential land use is included in the modeled pervious area with a composite curve number based on an area-weighted average. Impervious percentages were estimated from a delineation of selected typical lots representing each land use. The directly connected impervious area is included explicitly in the subbasin characteristics as a percentage. See Table 3-4 for the criteria for the impervious percentage assigned to each land use. Attributes for the typical lots can be seen in Appendix D. SCS Curve Number Each subbasin was assigned an SCS curve number based on hydrologic soil group, unconnected impervious area, land use, and ground cover type as outlined in Chapter 2 of TR- 55 (NRCS, 1986). The curve number describes the relationship between precipitation and runoff from the pervious/unconnected impervious portions of the subbasin. Curve numbers range from 0 to 100. Areas that are more pervious have lower curve numbers. For example, a well vegetated subbasin with sandy soils and little unconnected impervious area would have a lower curve number than a poorly vegetated subbasin with clay soils and a significant amount of unconnected impervious area. The vegetation condition was determined based on 2014 aerial imagery and the 2011 National Land Cover Database (Homer, et. al., 2015). Vegetative conditions are described in TR-55 as Poor, Fair, or Good for land uses of Open Space, Desert Shrub (reflecting desert landscaping), and Straight Row Crops for agricultural areas. The definitions of the vegetative conditions are included in Table 3-3. Vegetative conditions can be seen on Figure 3-4. Table 3-3 Vegetative Condition Definitions TR-55 Cover Type Master Plan Land Use Type Percent of Area Covered with Vegetation Good Condition Fair Condition Poor Condition Open Space Open Space, Parks, Residential <50% Ground Cover 50%-75% Ground Cover >75% Ground Cover Desert Shrub Commercial, Mobile Home, Street, Vacant Lots, Yards <30% Ground Cover 30%-70% Ground Cover >70% Ground Cover Straight Row Crops Agriculture <20% Ground Cover Not Applicable ͟>20% Ground Cover The unconnected impervious areas were determined based on the attributes of typical lots. Curve numbers were taken from TR-55 and then modified based on the unconnected areas delineated in the typical lot survey. See Table 3-4 for the criteria for the curve number assignment and directly connected impervious percentages. Page 119 of 235 M A I N S T 400 N 500 WHW Y 1 2 8 MIL L C R EEKDRUS 1 9 1200 S S PANI SHV A L L EYDRKANE C R E EKBLVD CENTER ST US 1 9 1 200 S FIGURE 3-4City of Moab - Storm Water Master Plan Vegetative Condition 0 3,500 7,0001,750 Feet ¦ Legend Study Area Good Condition Fair Condition Poor Condition Document Path: H:\Projects\380 - Moab City\04.100 - storm water master plan\GIS\Figures\Figure3_4LandConditions.mxdDate: 7/21/2017General Condition Descriptions Good Condition: >75% ground cover Fair Condition: 50 to 75% ground cover Poor Condition: <50% ground cover Page 120 of 235 City of Moab 3-5 Storm Water Master Plan Table 3-4 Land Use Characteristics Land Use Type Directly Connected Impervious Soil Type with Condition Good Fair Poor A* B* C D A* B* C D A* B* C D Agriculture 0% 67 78 85 89 Not in TR-55 72 81 88 91 Commercial 56% 72 82 88 91 Not in TR-55 Mobile Home 17% 70 81 88 90 Not in TR-55 Open Space 0% 79 68 79 84 55 72 81 86 63 77 85 88 Parks 1% 44 64 76 82 53 72 81 85 71 81 87 90 Residential (0.25 acres) 13% 56 72 81 85 63 77 85 88 77 85 90 92 Residential (0.75 acres) 6% 46 65 77 82 55 72 81 86 72 81 87 90 Residential (1 acre) 3% 43 63 75 81 52 71 80 85 70 80 87 90 Residential 7% 48 67 78 83 57 74 82 86 73 82 88 90 Streets 78% 63 77 85 88 Not in TR-55 Vacant Lots 0% 49 68 79 84 55 72 81 86 63 77 85 88 Yards (Storage) 5% 69 80 87 90 Not in TR-55 *Landuse areas with imported topsoil for desert landscaping use a minimum curve number of the B type soil. Shaded italicized cells were not used in the characteristics calculations. Lag Time The lag time is the time between the center of mass of rainfall to the peak of the hydrograph (Linsley and Franzini, 1979). Lag time is often estimated as 0.6 multiplied by the time of concentration (NRCS, 1986). The time of concentration is the time it takes for runoff to travel from the hydraulically most distant point of the subbasin to the outlet of the subbasin. Lag times for the master plan were calculated using two different methods. A method developed by Simas and Hawkins (1998) was used for undeveloped subbasins that extended up onto the cliffs and mesas surrounding the City of Moab. Approximately 91 subbasins had lag times calculated using this method, with times ranging from 7 minutes to 70 minutes. The calculation is shown below. = 0.0051 ∗ ℎ .∗ .∗ ( 1,000 − 10) . ℎ = ℎ ℎ ℎ = ℎ ℎ ℎ ℎ = ℎ ℎ ℎℎ ℎ The lag time for the subbasins in the developed portions of the City were determined using the TR-55 method. This method calculates time of concentration by breaking up the watershed length into sections of sheet flow, shallow concentrated flow, and open channels and Page 121 of 235 City of Moab 3-6 Storm Water Master Plan subsequently determining the travel times for each section. The method is more time intensive than the Simas and Hawkins method and has several more variables. Due to the large number of subbasins (187) containing developed land and the time required using the TR-55 method, lag times were calculated individually for several subbasins and then applied to subbasins of similar size and land use. Lag times developed by the TR-55 method range between 4 minutes and 33 minutes. HYDRAULICS Links Conveyances (called links in SWMM and SSA) convey runoff between the junctions in the model. Typical conveyances include pipes, box culverts, ditches, canals, natural channels, outlet pipes, orifice plates, weirs, pumps, and in some cases, gutters. Conveyance characteristics for each model were defined using City input, aerial imagery, and data from the system inventory which identified conveyances. This information is used in the model to perform the hydraulic analysis for timing and routing of storm runoff hydrographs. Some uncertainty is associated with modeled drainage paths. Some of the conveyances had to be added to the model even though the conveyance was not clearly defined. These include cases where flows are conveyed through a culvert but the open ditches downstream of the culvert are heavily vegetated and do not have clearly defined banks. Unlike HEC-HMS, SWMM and SSA will limit flow through conduits based on the conduit’s capacity. For example, if a subbasin has a peak flow of 10 cfs while the conduit only has a capacity of 6 cfs, flooding would occur at the upstream node and the conduit would be limited to its peak capacity under surcharged conditions. The upstream node would experience flooding near 4 cfs. This is helpful when analyzing how the system actually functions, but can hinder efforts to determine the potential peak flows at a point. It is important to remember this model characteristic during the design process and make the proper modifications to accommodate full potential flow. Nodes In the model, nodes are points where conveyances or subbasins connect. Nodes generally represent manholes, inlets, outfalls, dividers, detention basins, or points where multiple conveyances combine. Nodes contain elevation data which determine the elevation of attached conveyances. Nodes also have depth data to determine if the point is experiencing flooding due to surcharging conditions. Flooding at nodes can be handled in the model in several ways. If the surface ponding option is used, the volume of water at a node above the maximum depth is stored at the node and released back into the system once surcharging conditions recede. If the surface ponding option is not used, any flooding is lost from the system. In order to conservatively estimate the volume of water entering storage nodes, the surface ponding option was used in this master plan. CAPACITY ANALYSIS The SWMM and SSA models have the ability to determine the water depth, flow rate, and capacity of conveyances during a precipitation event. This detailed analysis includes calculating surcharged conditions and backwater effects if the Dynamic Wave routing method is selected. Page 122 of 235 City of Moab 3-7 Storm Water Master Plan This capability makes the SWMM engine a very useful tool in analyzing the hydraulic capability of a storm drainage system. DESIGN FLOW RATES The model computes hydrographs for each subbasin, conveyance, and junction. The City storm drainage system was analyzed with the 10-year and 100-year 24-hour precipitation events. Select areas requiring the piping network to convey 100-year precipitation events were modeled accordingly. Because of the way the model handles flooding at nodes, 100-year storms are only modeled for features expected to carry 100-year storm flows, such as storage basins, culverts, and major trunk lines or where significant flooding might occur. Although these features are analyzed based on their ability to convey 100-year flows, some of the minor features tributary to them may provide hydraulic restrictions. Most storm drain systems anticipate surcharging during 100-year storm events and rely on gutter and surface flow in combination with lateral and minor trunk line capacities to convey excess runoff to the outlet. A schematic of the urban storm drainage criteria for inlets, laterals, and minor trunk lines is shown on Figure 3-5. Page 123 of 235 Page 124 of 235 City of Moab 4-1 Storm Water Master Plan CHAPTER 4 – STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The Moab Storm Drain System was analyzed using the model, observations from City staff, the Grand County Storm Drainage Criteria, and best management practices for the industry. CRITERIA The criteria selected by the City correspond with storm drainage design criteria for Grand County. Criteria include: 10-year design capacity for the initial drainage system. The initial drainage system includes inlets, laterals, minor trunk lines, gutters, and roadside ditches. 100-year capacity where flooding of homes may occur. 100-year capacity on major detention/retention, culverts and major conveyance facilities (limited to storm drain hydraulic capacities of the upstream initial drainage system). DEFICIENCIES Deficiencies were identified based on input from City staff, notes during the HAL survey, and results from the model. Locations where the City has experienced flooding were analyzed in the model to determine the cause of the flooding. The model is helpful in determining which hydraulic limitation actually causes the visible flooding. Table 4-1 and Figure 4-1 summarize the drainage deficiencies identified in this study. Each deficiency has a Deficiency ID (used in this study), a location description, and problem definition. Not all deficiencies necessitate capital improvements. Because storm drain systems are designed to convey the 10-year event, a 10-year event will produce flows at or near the pipe capacity of the system. Some nodes in the model identified areas of surcharging which were determined to not be a deficiency because the surcharging is contained in the curb and gutter system. A pipe at capacity or a surcharged node in the model was only added to the deficiency list if flooding was significant in the model and/or City staff had identified previous flooding at the location. After identifying the deficiencies in Table 4-1, the project team and City staff met in a workshop to discuss which deficiencies warranted action. Deficiencies identified as not warranting action will be monitored by City staff for flooding. Deficiencies are shown on Figure 4-1 as sediment issues, in-road conveyances, repair issues, and capacity deficiencies. Sediment issues represent locations where sediment or debris has been deposited in the storm water system or where erosion has impacted the system. In-road conveyances represent areas where significant runoff is conveyed in the curb and gutter or where piped storm drains empty into the curb and gutter before reaching an open channel or enclosed conveyance. Repair issues represent locations where storm water structures are damaged and need repaired. Capacity deficiencies represent areas where the model and/or City have identified flooding. Page 125 of 235 City of Moab 4-2 Storm Water Master Plan Table 4-1 Storm Drainage Deficiencies Deficiency ID Location Problem Description 1 Williams Way from approximately 150 West to 180 West (Pipe is north of the road) During survey efforts it was noted that the pipe is damaged and needs to be replaced. Discussions with the City have confirmed the damaged pipe. 2 Private driveway at approximately 420 East and 100 North to the spillway of the detention basin Conveyance facilities consist of a shallow ditch which gets progressively shallower nearer to 100 North. Any flow from the detention basin results in flows in the driveway. Serious flows and overflows from the detention basin cause significant erosion and flooding problems in the driveway and near 100 North. Efforts have been undertaken by private property owners to protect the driveway and adjacent homes from flooding. 3 Bittle Lane from Main Street to where Bittle Lane turns to the East Modeling efforts show that adverse grades and small pipe diameters do not provide enough capacity to carry the 10-year flows. The adverse grades also reduce flow velocities to a point that sediments from the south side of main street collect and fill in the storm drain pipes. The City has verified that the area does not have sufficient capacity. 4 Jackson Street from approximately Madison Way to the north side of Main Street Significant runoff flows onto the southernmost point of Jackson Street. There are no inlet or conveyance facilities to capture the flows. The roadside ditch near Jefferson Street collects sediment from the runoff and the inlets and pipes at the intersection of Jackson Street and Main Street do not have enough capacity to convey the 100-year runoff to Pack Creek. This deficiency was noted by the City, identified during surveying efforts, and identified during modeling efforts. The overflows from this deficiency also contribute to deficiencies 11 and 57. This deficiency may include County facilities. 5 Along the back of the lots on the west side of Tusher Street from Locust Lane to approximately 440 South Modeling efforts have indicated that the 10-inch pipe experiences full pipe flow. Overflows will be conveyed down Locust Lane in the curb and gutter. 6 The lowest point of Loveridge Drive north to Locust Lane Modeling efforts have indicated that the 15-inch pipe does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. This is a topographical low point and should have the capacity to convey 100-year flows without flooding any buildings. 7 Culvert across Spanish Valley Drive at approximately 1400 Spanish Valley Drive Modeling efforts have indicated that the 18-inch pipe does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. This deficiency includes County facilities. 8 Culvert across Murphy Lane at approximately 1320 Murphy Lane Modeling efforts have indicated that the 18-inch pipe does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. This deficiency includes County facilities. 9 From 123 Arbor Drive to Pack Creek Modeling efforts have indicated that the 18-inch pipe does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. This is a downstream cul-de-sac and should have the capacity to convey 100-year flows without flooding any buildings. This deficiency includes County facilities. 10 Culvert across US 191 at approximately 1250 Highway 191 Modeling efforts have indicated that the 24-inch pipe does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. This deficiency includes County facilities. 11 The 24-inch pipe along the back of the lots along Main Street from Dogwood Avenue to Birch Avenue and Kane Creek Boulevard This deficiency is significantly impacted by deficiency 4 but modeling efforts showed it also lacks capacity for local drainage during the 100-year storm. The City has verified this deficiency and sediment issues were also noted during the survey. The sediment likely comes from deficiency 4. Page 126 of 235 City of Moab 4-3 Storm Water Master Plan Deficiency ID Location Problem Description 12 From Aspen Avenue and Kane Creek Boulevard to Pack Creek Modeling efforts have shown that the 18-inch pipe does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 10-year flows. The City has also noted that the area experiences inlet clogging issues from autumn leaf falls. 13 Main Street from 100 North to 200 North The model and City have identified flooding issues along Main Street during 10-year storms. This area experiences flows from the detention basin on the east end of 100 North. Flooding is caused by the lack of capacity in the existing 18- inch pipe, is also impacted by deficiency 14, and is worsened by the placement of storm drain inlets. 14 100 West from 200 North to Walnut Lane, Walnut Lane from 100 West to the hospital property, and from the cul- de-sac at 200 North 209 West to Walnut Lane The model and City have identified that the existing storm drain reduces to a 12-inch pipe which does not have enough capacity to convey the 10-year storm. Overflows bubble up at 200 North and 100 West and flow north to Swanny Park where they contribute to deficiencies 16 and 18. The storm drainage in the downhill cul-de-sac should have the capacity to convey the 100-year storm. 15 From Nob Hill (300 North) and Main Street to 300 North and 100 West The model and surveying efforts have identified capacity and sediment issues in this area. The existing 18-inch pipe and small box culvert do not have the capacity to convey the 10- year flows. 16 Swanny City Park from 100 West to 400 North and from Swanny Park and 400 North to 500 West and 400 North The City and model have identified capacity issues with the trapezoidal channel across the park. The channel does not have capacity to convey the 10-year flows. Significant flows are conveyed in the street and gutter along 400 North to 500 West. 17 Highway 191 at 570 North, Maxine Avenue to 400 North, and along 400 North from Maxine Avenue to 500 West The City and model have identified capacity issues at the culvert crossing Highway 191. The culvert does not have capacity to convey the 10-year flows and significant flows from Cermak Road sheet flow over the highway, through the private lot, and onto Maxine Avenue. There is no curb or gutter in Maxine Avenue and the runoff surface flows to 400 North where it is conveyed in the street and gutter to the inlets at 500 West. This deficiency may include UDOT facilities. 18 500 West and 400 North The City and model have identified that the inlets on the east side of the intersection with their adjoining pipes do not have sufficient capacity to convey the 10-year flows. Flows that cannot enter the storm drain network at this point flow around the corner to the inlets on the south side of the intersection. 19 Highway 191 at approximately 600 North, along Highway 191 on the southwest side of the highway to approximately 800 North, then on the northeast side of the Highway to the existing culvert at approximately 1100 North The City has identified sediment deposits in the large culvert under the highway at 600 North, which are likely deposited due to the lower velocities caused by downstream capacity issues. The culvert flows into a ditch and piping system that lack adequate capacity according to the model and as identified by the City. The minimum pipe diameter in this system is 15 inches. The ditch and piping system along the Highway also lack an adequate outlet. Investigation into the history of the system in this location suggests that the canal was filled in by the irrigation company downstream of 800 North and no efforts were ever made to provide solutions for the storm runoff. During a large enough storm, the canal fills up, spills in some locations, and exceeds the elevation of the drive approach at the bottom of Sunset Grill until it begins to flow northwest on the north side of the Highway. There is no designated conveyance to take the flows along the Highway until they reach the 36-inch culvert at approximately 1100 North. Portions of this deficiency are UDOT facilities. Page 127 of 235 City of Moab 4-4 Storm Water Master Plan Deficiency ID Location Problem Description 20 Highway 191 at approximately 1100 North The City and model have identified that the culvert across Highway 191 at approximately 1100 North does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. This is a UDOT facility. 21 Highway 191 at approximately 990 North Surveying efforts noted sediment deposits in the northern end of the culvert. 22 500 West from Highway 191 to approximately 910 North The City and model have identified capacity issues with the existing storm drain which does not have enough capacity to convey the 10-year storm. The abnormal pipe shape and small size likely contribute to the capacity issues. 23 Private lots from the west ends of Carlos Court and Juan Court to 500 West and 770 North The conveyance system from downhill courts does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm as identified by the model and by Moab City. 24 Holliday Drive and 400 North The model has identified that the pipe going from the south side of 400 North to the trunk line does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 10-year storm. 25 Holliday Drive and 230 North The model has identified that the pipe conveying storm runoff from the Grand Oasis Mobile Home Park does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 10-year storm. This is a private facility. 26 400 North from 500 West to Holliday Drive The City has identified significant corrosion in portions of the corrugated metal pipe in this area. 27 Kane Creek Road approximately 0.97 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The model has identified that the 15-inch culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. This may be a County facility. 28 Kane Creek Road approximately 1.15 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The model has identified that the 24-inch culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. This is a County facility. 29 Kane Creek Road approximately 1.27 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The model has identified that the 18-inch culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. This may be a County facility. 30 Kane Creek Road approximately 1.33 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The model has identified that the 24-inch culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. 31 Kane Creek Road approximately 1.61 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The model has identified that the 24-inch culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. This is a County facility. 32 Kane Creek Road approximately 1.74 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The model has identified that the 18-inch culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. This is a County facility. 33 Kane Creek Road approximately 1.88 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The model has identified that the 24-inch culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. This is a County facility. 34 Highway 191 at approximately 1200 North The model has identified that the 24-inch culvert across the Highway does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100- year storm. This is a UDOT facility. 35 Highway 191 at approximately 1400 North The model has identified that the 24-inch culvert across the Highway does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100- year storm. This is a UDOT facility. 36 Highway 191 at approximately 1500 North The model has identified that the 24-inch culvert across the Highway does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100- year storm. This is a UDOT facility. Page 128 of 235 City of Moab 4-5 Storm Water Master Plan Deficiency ID Location Problem Description 37 Highway 191 at approximately 1675 North The model has identified that the 24-inch culvert across the Highway does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100- year storm. This is a UDOT facility. 38 Highway 128 approximately 0.49 miles along the Highway from Highway 191 The model has identified that the 18-inch culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. This is a UDOT facility. 39 Highway 128 approximately 0.78 miles along the Highway from Highway 191 The model has identified that the 18-inch culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year storm. This is a UDOT facility. 40 Bike path along Highway 191 from 990 North to 1100 North and from 1400 North to 1700 North The City has identified that runoff from the uphill side of the bike path overtops the path and causes erosion on the downhill side of the path. 41 100 North from 400 East to Main Street (generally on the north side of the road) Runoff and flows from the upstream detention basin are conveyed only in the curb and gutter on the north side of the road. The area experiences significant flows and depths during storm events. 42 Center Street from approximately 500 East to Main Street Runoff is conveyed only in the curb and gutter on the north side of the road. The area experiences significant flows and depths during events. 43 From Rosetree Lane and Hillside Drive to 200 South and along 200 South to 400 East Runoff is conveyed only in the curb and gutter. 44 Locust Lane from 580 East to 400 East and along 400 East to 200 South Runoff is conveyed only in the curb and gutter. 45 Boulder Avenue from 1325 South to Highway 191 and along Highway 191 to 1070 South Significant flows from the drainage south of Boulder Avenue are conveyed in curb and gutter to the nearest inlet on Highway 191. Most of the flow bypasses the inlet due to capacity restrictions. This deficiency may include County facilities. 46 Bowling Alley Lane from Highway 191 to Bittle Lane and along Bittle Lane to Antiquity Lane Runoff is conveyed only in the curb and gutter. This deficiency may include County facilities. 47 From the detention basin behind the Utah Parks and Recreation Building north of Highway 191 to Bowling Alley Lane and along Bowling Alley Lane to Bittle Lane Runoff is conveyed only in the curb and gutter. 48 400 East from Minor Court to Pack Creek Runoff is conveyed only in the curb and gutter. 49 Kane Creek Boulevard from Mountain View Drive to 475 West Runoff is conveyed only in the curb and gutter. The existing storm drain entering Kane Creek Boulevard in this area acts as a bubble up although the invert of the system is well below the elevation of the curb and gutter. The City has identified flooding in this area. 50 Main Street from 488 North to 570 North The private storm drain system for the Hampton Inn ends in an inlet that currently acts as a bubble up. Flows are conveyed north in the curb and gutter to the inlet in front of the Inca Inn and south to the inlets at 300 North. 51 Gala Avenue at 585 West to the open channel behind the properties to the north The City has identified flooding and debris at this location. The deficiencies are likely caused by backwater effects in the open channel which conveys significant flows from 500 West. Page 129 of 235 City of Moab 4-6 Storm Water Master Plan Deficiency ID Location Problem Description 52 The northwest corner of Hale Avenue to the outlet on the northwest corner of the property The City and model have identified capacity deficiencies due to the high elevation of the outfall at this location. This is a private facility. 53 McCormick Boulevard from 670 North to McGill Avenue and along McGill Avenue to 500 West Runoff is conveyed only in the curb and gutter. 54 250 North 300 East The City has noted sediment and debris in this area. 55 Highway 191 and 1515 North Surveying efforts revealed that the storm drain has sediment deposits. This is a UDOT facility. 56 Arrowhead Lane for approximately 220 feet from Highway 191 The City and surveying efforts have shown that the storm drain system collects significant sediments in this area. The downstream portion of the system has a very flat slope which may contribute to the deposition of sediments. The buildup of sediment in the pipe also restricts the capacity of the pipe to a point where pressurized pipe flows pop the manhole lid near Highway 191. 57 Highway 191 at 980 South The City and surveying efforts have identified sediment deposits in the culvert crossing Highway 191. This deficiency may include UDOT facilities. 58 100 South from 150 East to 100 East The City has identified flooding on the north side of the road. The road is graded so almost all flows collect in the north gutter, the gutter has very flat slopes, and there are capacity issues at the inlet at 100 East and 100 South. Capacity issues at deficiency 66 cause overflows to contribute to this deficiency via 200 East and 100 South. 59 Mill Creek Drive from Holyoak Lane to 1320 South Surveying efforts identified sediment deposits in the open ditch along Mill Creek Drive. 60 Highway 191 from 1070 South to Jackson Street Significant flows are conveyed in the curb and gutter between the two inlets. 61 1550 North Highway 191 Surveying efforts identified sediment deposits in the culvert across Highway 191. This may include UDOT facilities. 62 Highway 191 from 1160 South to Bowling Alley Lane Surveying efforts identified sediment deposits in the 18-inch pipe. This deficiency may include UDOT and County facilities. 63 Southeast corner of the intersection of Highway 128 and Highway 191 Surveying efforts identified sediment deposits in the inlet. This may be a UDOT facility. 64 Parking Lot at approximately 940 East Kane Creek Boulevard Surveying efforts identified sediment deposits in the private storm drain system from the parking lot. 65 Oak Street from 870 East to Hillside Drive Surveying efforts identified sediment deposits in the storm drain system. 66 200 South from 400 East to 200 East The City has identified flooding that flows across 400 East and cannot enter the storm drain systems due to inlet restrictions. The flows pond at 200 East and 200 South and then flow north towards 100 South. There is also a topographical low point with no inlet at the southeast corner of 300 East and 200 South. Modeling efforts show that the pipe should have the capacity to convey the 10-year flows. This deficiency contributes to deficiency 58. Page 130 of 235 City of Moab 4-7 Storm Water Master Plan Deficiency ID Location Problem Description 67 Dirt road extending from Rosetree Lane east behind the residential lots along the north side of Arches Drive The City has identified that a ditch and the dirt road experience significant erosion during storms which is then deposited in a bubble up and along the curb and gutter at Rosetree Lane and Hillside Drive. 68 Center Street from 650 East to 500 East The City has identified that the ditch on the south side of the road experiences flooding and erosion. This may be a private facility. 69 Bowling Alley Lane and Bittle Lane The City has noted that flows in the curb and gutter on the west side of Bowling Alley Lane overtop Bittle Lane diagonally and flood the driveway west of the storm drain inlet north of Bittle Lane. 70 Kelling Wash to 200 North and 200 East The previous master plan identified this area as receiving significant flow from Kelling Wash. Current efforts suggest that the impact from runoff is less than previously predicted. 71 Pedestrian walkway under 500 West by Mill Creek The City has noted that surcharges in the pipeline flood the walkway. 72 Moab City Public Works parking lot and yard The City has noted that the storm drainage in the Public Works parking lot does not adequately connect to a downstream conveyance and therefore backs up, causing flooding in the yard. MINIMUM CONVEYANCE SIZE The criteria selected by the City specifies minimum conveyance dimensions. The City has selected a minimum pipe diameter of 24 inches as the standard for City facilities. Figure 4-2 shows which conveyances do not meet the City’s minimum size criteria. Some pipes that do not meet the minimum size are identified as under capacity as seen on Figure 4-1. A pipe not meeting the minimum size does not necessitate an immediate solution unless accompanied by frequent or significant flooding, but should be monitored for surcharging and replaced with the proper size when possible. Page 131 of 235 #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ1917 42 4 0 41 16 443 14 1145 544 26 4849 53 462 661315 7047 6221 2 68 96 050 5962 1 58 6 7 23 356525451 65 1 8 71 25 103 4 8355720 2 15536 769247266 440146723 Mill C r e ekPack Cree kMAIN STUS 191400 N 500 WMILLCREEK DR200 S KANECREEKBLVDCENTER ST SPANISH VALLEY DR 200 S 6 1 64City of Moab Storm Water Master Plan Identified Deficiencies FIGURE 4-1 Legend KJ Detention Basin 100 yr Surcharging 10 yr Surcharging #*Outfall No Surcharging at Node Sediment Issues In Road Conveyance Repair Issues Capacity Deficiencies Modeled Conveyances Streams 0 700 1,400350 Feet ¦Document Path: H:\Projects\380 - Moab City\04.100 - storm water master plan\GIS\Figures\Figure4_1Deficiencies.mxdDate: 7/21/2017#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* 30 33 Colorado RiverM ill Cree k KANE CREEK BLVD 28 2 7 32 31 29 64#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* 4 0 1922563 435 2 0 3 7 2 15536 393840Colorado River MAI N STH W Y 128US 191500 W6 1 6 3 Page 132 of 235 MAIN STHWY 128400 N 500 WUS 191 MILLCREEKDR200 S K A N ECREEKB LV D CENTER ST S PANI SHVALLEYDRUS 191200 S City of Moab Storm Water Master Plan Minimum Conveyance Sizes FIGURE 4-2 Legend Modeled Conveyance Above Minimum Dia. Below 24 inch Minimum Dia. 0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet ¦Document Path: H:\Projects\380 - Moab City\04.100 - storm water master plan\Plan Update\GIS\Figure4_2MinimumPipeSizes_newUpdate.mxdDate: 10/6/2017Page 133 of 235 City of Moab 5-1 Storm Water Master Plan CHAPTER 5 – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN This Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) presents the problems, alternatives, and recommendations identified in the study to improve storm drainage in the City of Moab. The CIP was developed from the hydrologic models, deficiency analysis, and workshops with City personnel. PREFERRED DRAINAGE PLAN DEVELOPMENT The project team held a workshop with City staff to evaluate the need for drainage improvements based on the deficiencies identified in Chapter 4. Selection of the preferred alternative for each problem was a process of evaluation and refinement rather than a simple choice between alternatives. The process of selecting a preferred alternative included: reviewing the list of storm drainage inadequacies, pre-screening drainage inadequacies, brainstorming possible solutions, screening alternatives based on feasibility and public acceptance, developing alternatives, comparing cost and function, and selecting the preferred alternative. Design criteria included: 10-year design capacity for the initial drainage system. The initial drainage system includes inlets, laterals, minor trunk lines, gutters, and roadside ditches. 100-year capacity where flooding of homes may occur. 100-year capacity on major detention/retention, culverts and major conveyance facilities (limited to storm drain hydraulic capacities). PRECISION OF COST ESTIMATES When considering cost estimates, there are several levels or degrees of precision depending on the purpose of the estimate and the percentage of detailed design that has been completed. The following levels of precision are typical: Type of Estimate Precision Master Planning ±50% Preliminary Design ±30% Final Design or Bid ±10% For example, at the master planning level (or conceptual or feasibility design level), if a project is estimated to cost $1,000,000, then the precision or reliability of the cost estimate would typically be expected to range between approximately $500,000 and $1,500,000. While this may seem very imprecise, the purpose of master planning is to develop general sizing, location, relative cost, and scheduling information on a number of individual projects that may be designed and constructed over a period of many years. Master planning also typically includes the selection of common design criteria to help ensure uniformity and compatibility among future individual projects. Details such as the exact capacity of individual projects, the level of Page 134 of 235 City of Moab 5-2 Storm Water Master Plan redundancy, the location of facilities, the alignment and depth of pipelines, the extent of utility conflicts, the cost of land and easements, the construction methodology, the types of equipment and material to be used, the time of construction, interest and inflation rates, permitting requirements, etc., are typically developed during the more detailed levels of design. At the preliminary or 10% design level, some of the aforementioned information will have been developed. Major design decisions such as the size of facilities, selection of facility sites, pipeline alignments and depths, and the selection of the types of equipment and material to be used during construction will typically have been made. At this level of design the precision of the cost estimate for a $1,000,000 project would typically be expected to range between approximately $700,000 and $1,300,000. After the project has been completely designed and is ready to bid, all design plans and technical specifications will have been completed and nearly all of the significant details about the project should be known. At this level of design, the precision of the cost estimate for the same $1,000,000 project would typically be expected to range between approximately $900,000 and $1,100,000. The flows and pipe diameters provided in the following Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) descriptions are approximate and are for planning purposes only. A detailed hydrologic and hydraulic analysis shall be performed during the design process of the projects to identify final design and sizing. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Cost estimates are based on conceptual-level engineering. Unit construction costs were estimated based on construction cost indices (ENR 2016), heavy construction data references (RSMeans 2016), and HAL’s experience with similar construction. Engineering cost estimates given in this study should be regarded as conceptual and appropriate for use as a planning guide. Only during final design can a definitive and more accurate estimate be provided. A detailed cost estimate of each project is provided in Appendix E. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Table 5-1 presents the recommended capital improvements which are shown in Figure 5-1. The projects in the Capital Improvement Plan have been planned at a conceptual level. The projects must go thorugh a preliminary and final design process before construction. The CIP projects are designed to specify the pipe size based on the required capacity as demonstrated in the model. CIP projects do not account for specific utility conflicts or inlet capacity. Utility conflicts and inlet capacity (type and number of inlets) should be determined during preliminary and final designs for each project. The preliminary and final designs should refer to the adopted storm drain criteria for the City. The criteria include guidelines for precipitation, inlet clogging, maximum velocities, sedimentation, erosion, and storage facilities, etc. The criteria for determining the priority of a project was generally based on existing flooding, flooding history, development plans in the area, and capacity determined by the model. Projects with significant frequent flooding were prioritized higher than other projects. The priority number and low, medium, or high priority status were developed in coordination with Moab City personnel. Page 135 of 235 City of Moab 5-3 Storm Water Master Plan Table 5-1 Capital Improvement Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority Moab City Facilities P1 1 100 West from Williams Way to 100 North Flows in the pipe crossing 100 West along Williams way need to be diverted to another pipeline to abandon the downstream damaged pipe. Install 246 feet of 24-in pipe in 100 West from the existing storm drain near Williams Way to the existing storm drain at Center Street and 100 West which outfalls directly south of 100 West to Mill Creek. This project is currently underway in cooperation with development along Walnut Lane. $47,000 1 High P30 49 Kane Creek Boulevard from 450 West to 475 West Runoff is conveyed only in the curb and gutter. The City has identified flooding in this area. Install 600 feet of 30-inch pipe from the bubble up in Kane Creek Boulevard to inlet located near 475 West. $132,000 2 High P28A 13, 41, 42, 58 100 North from 425 East to 400 East, 400 East from 100 North to 100 South, 100 South from 400 East to 100 East, 100 East from 100 South to Mill Creek Flooding occurs along Main Street and is impacted by the lack of conveyance to collect flows from the Johnson Canyon and White Canyon detention basins. Significant flooding occurs near 100 South and 100 East due to insufficient capacity issues as well as due to overflow from the storm drain in 200 South from 400 East to 200 East. Install 93 feet of 24-in pipe from the detention basin open channel (P2) in 100 North from 425 East to 400 East. Install 1,168 feet of 24-in pipe in 400 East from 100 North to 100 South. Install 635 feet of 24-in pipe in 100 South from 400 East to 300 East. Install 558 feet of 24-in pipe in 100 South from 300 East to 200 East. Install 382 feet of 30-in pipe in 100 South from 200 East to 120 East. Install 112 feet of 36-in pipe in 100 South from 120 East to 100 East. Install 543 feet of 36-in pipe in 100 East from 100 South to the outfall on Mill Creek. To reach new inlets across 100 South install 60 feet of 24-in pipe at 300 East and 200 East, 60 feet of 24-in pipe at 120 East and 70 feet of 24-in pipe at 100 East. This design will convey the 10-year flows from the detention basins and the 100-year flows from the 100 East 100 South area. For the design that conveys the 100-year flows from the detention basins, see 28B. $758,000 3 High Page 136 of 235 City of Moab 5-4 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P28B Alternative 13, 41, 42, 58 100 North from 425 East to 400 East, 400 East from 100 North to 100 South, 100 South from 400 East to 100 East, 100 East from 100 South to Mill Creek Flooding occurs along Main Street and is impacted by the lack of conveyance to collect flows from the Johnson Canyon and White Canyon detention basins. Significant flooding occurs near 100 South and 100 East due to insufficient capacity issues as well as due to overflow from the storm drain in 200 South from 400 East to 200 East. Install 93 feet of 36-in pipe from detention basin open channel (P2) in 100 North from 425 East to 400 East. Install 565 feet of 36-in pipe in 400 East from 100 North to Center Street. Install 603 feet of 36-in pipe in 400 East from Center Street to 100 South. Install 1,193 feet of 36-in pipe in 100 South from 400 East to 200 East. Install 494 feet of double barreled 30-in pipe in 100 South from 200 East to 100 East. Install 543 feet of 54-in pipe in 100 East from 100 South to the outfall on Mill Creek. To reach new inlets across 100 South install 60 feet of 24-in pipe at 300 East, 60 feet of 24-in pipe at 200 East and 120 East, and 70 feet of 24-in pipe at 100 East. This design will convey the 100-year flows. For a less expensive design that conveys 10-year flows, see 28A. $1,287,000 3 High P35 66 200 South from 400 East to 200 East Flooding occurs at 200 East after flows east of 400 East cross the road and travel down 200 South. Replace the existing storm drain in 200 South across 200 East with 70 feet of 30-in pipe with increased inlet capacity. Install 60 feet of 24-in pipe with a new inlet in 300 East across 200 South. Install 55 feet of 24-in pipe in 400 East across 200 South with increased inlet capacities. $53,000 4 High Page 137 of 235 City of Moab 5-5 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P12A 14, 15, 16, 18 100 West from 300 North to Walnut Lane, 200 North from 60 West to 100 North, Walnut Lane from 100 West to the existing 60-in storm drain behind the hospital, and from the downhill cul-de-sac on 200 North to Walnut Lane Walnut Lane lacks adequate capacity to convey flows from Main Street. Flows in excess of the capacity bubble out of the storm drain system and flow north on 100 West, adding to flooding issues at deficiencies 16 and 18. The downhill cul-de-sac on 200 North lacks adequate drainage to convey the 100-year flows. Install inlets and 550 feet of 24-in pipe in 100 West from 300 North to 200 North. Replace the existing 24-in pipe in 200 North from approximately 60 West to 100 West with 177 feet of new 24-in pipe in order to achieve a steeper slope to gain cover above the pipe. Replace the 18-in pipe at the intersection of 200 North and 100 West with 44 feet of 30-in pipe. Replace the existing 15-in pipe in 100 West from 200 North to Walnut Lane with 223 feet of 36-in pipe. Replace the existing 12-in pipe in Walnut Lane with 522 feet of 42-in pipe from 100 West to approximately 209 West . Replace the existing 12-in pipe in Walnut Lane with 885 feet of 48-in from approximately 209 West to the existing 60-in pipe behind the hospital. Replace the existing pipe from the 200 North cul-de-sac to Walnut Lane with 24-in pipe. $770,000 5 High P12B Alternative 14, 15, 16, 18 100 West from 200 North to 300 North, Park Drive from 100 West to 350 West (future road), 350 West from Park Lane to the existing 60-in pipe behind the hospital. Walnut Lane lacks adequate capacity to convey flows from Main Street. Flows in excess of the capacity bubble out of the storm drain system and flow north on 100 West, adding to flooding issues at deficiencies 16 and 18. Connect to existing storm drain and inlets at 200 North and 100 West with approximately 65 feet of 24-in pipe. Install 386 feet of 30-in pipe in 100 West from 200 North to Park Drive. Install 126 feet of 24-in pipe in 100 West from 300 North to Park Drive, install 1,459 feet of 42-in pipe in Park Drive from 100 West to a location in a future road at approximately 350 West. Install 543 feet of 42-in pipe in a future road at 350 West from Park Drive to the existing 60-in storm drain behind the hospital. $782,000 5 High Page 138 of 235 City of Moab 5-6 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P14 17, 18, 19, 20, 50 Cermak Road, Highway 191 (Main Street) from 488 North to 500 West, undeveloped area from Stewart Canyon to Highway 191, 500 West and Highway 191 to approximately 1450 West and 1050 North Flows from Stewart Canyon cause flooding down Cermak Road, and along Highway 191. The existing canal and pipe system along Highway 191 does not have an outlet or designated downstream conveyance. The abandoned canal acts as a retention facility and experiences overflows during large events. The storm drain system from Hampton Inn dead ends in Highway 191. During storm events, runoff sheet flows over the highway and floods 400 North. Install 311 feet of 30-in pipe in Main Street from 488 North to 570 North (to existing inlets). Install 555 feet of 36-in pipe in Main Street from 570 North to 600 North. Install 524 feet of 30-in pipe in Cermak Road to Main Street. Install 545 feet of 42-in pipe in Highway 191 from 600 North to the existing 48-in storm drain across Highway 191. Install 1,043 feet of 24-in pipe from the Stewart Canyon debris basin southwest to the existing 48-in culvert crossing Highway 191. Install 2,415 feet of 54-in pipe along Highway 191 from the referenced 48-in culvert to 980 North. Install 221 feet of 48-in by 60-in box culvert along Highway 191 from 980 North to 500 West. Install 216 feet of 48-in by 60-in box culvert across Highway 191 to 500 West. Install 1,170 feet of 48-in by 60-in box culvert along the property line at approximately 1010 North from 500 West to 643 West. Install a detention basin with approximately 20 acre-feet of volume with a 24-in outlet approximately 60 feet long. Sizing of the detention basin may vary depending on the outlet structure and capacity. This deficiency includes UDOT facilities. Large conveyances may change in the final design but should retain the capacity of the conveyances listed in the CIP. The design storm is the 50-year storm to match UDOT criteria. $1,370,6811 (Moab portion) 6 High Page 139 of 235 City of Moab 5-7 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P3 3 Across Bittle Lane at approximately 1040 South to the open ditch from the west end of Bittle Lane to Minor Court Adverse grades in the ditch and small pipe diameters do not provide enough capacity to carry the flows. The low capacity also creates slower velocities which promote sediment deposits in the system. The area sees significant sediment laden flows from Boulder Avenue. Replace the existing 18-in pipe with 53 feet of 24-in pipe, replace the open ditch along the back of the lots on Minor Court with 310 feet of 24-in pipe with a regraded slope, and replace the existing 18-in pipe along 400 East to Minor Court with 83 feet of 24-in pipe. Install 371 feet of 24-in pipe from the bubble up in Minor Court along 400 East to the existing manhole on the west side of the street just north of the Maverick property. Install 830 feet of 30-in pipe in 400 East to a new outfall on Pack Creek, combining flows from 400 East and Bittle Lane as well as accommodating new development in the area. $322,000 7 High P4 4, 11, 57 Jackson Street from the southernmost end to Main Street City has identified significant flooding issues here. Jackson Street lacks inlet structures to capture flows coming from the cliffside drainages to the south. The ditch along Jackson Street lacks capacity and has experienced sediment deposits. The runoff from the natural drainages is laden with sediments and causes flooding issues at 980 South on Main Street and on Dogwood Avenue. Install a debris basin with inlet structure to reduce the amount of sediment in the runoff at the southernmost end of Jackson Street. Install 720 feet of 24-in pipe from the debris basin to Jefferson Street. Replace the open ditch along Jackson Street with 146 feet of 24-in pipe. This may include County facilities but it is recommended that Moab pursue the project with or without County financial input. $195,000 8 High P9 11 Existing storm drain alignment along the back of the lots along Main Street from Dogwood Avenue to Birch Avenue and Kane Creek Boulevard This area sees significant flooding and sediment deposits from Jackson Street as well as lacks capacity to convey the 100-year flows from the area, which is a topographical low point. Replace the existing 24-in pipe with 1,370 feet of 36-in pipe with a new outfall to Pack Creek being installed across Kane Creek Boulevard approximately 160 feet southeast of the existing outfall. $442,000 9 High Page 140 of 235 City of Moab 5-8 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P10 12 Existing storm drain alignment from Aspen Avenue and Kane Creek Boulevard to Pack Creek Modeling efforts have shown that the 18-in pipe doesn’t have sufficient capacity to convey the 10-year flows. The area also experiences debris issues from fallen leaves during autumn. Replace the existing 18-in pipe with 557 feet of 30-in pipe. $112,000 10 High P31 51 Gala Avenue at 585 West to the open channel behind the properties to the north The City has identified flooding and debris at this location. Install a backflow preventer valve in the existing 15-in pipe to prevent debris and flooding from the open channel. $9,000 12 Medium P2 2 Along the private drive at 425 East 100 North Flows from the upstream detention basin flow onto the dirt road private drive causing significant erosion and flooding problems. Install 385 feet of a 5-ft wide by 2.5-ft deep rectangular open channel from the spillway structure of the detention basin to 100 North. $81,000 13 Medium P16 22 510 North 500 West The City and model show capacity issues with the storm drain system, likely impacted by the odd shapes and small sizes of the existing system. Install 31 feet of 24-in pipe from the existing storm drain on the east side of 500 West to the manhole in the west lane of 500 West. $9,000 14 Medium P18 24, 26, 52 400 North from 500 West to the outfall by the treatment plant The City has identified storm drain in need of repair from 500 West to Holliday Drive. The model shows the storm drain at Holliday Drive as not having sufficient capacity. Hale Avenue experiences flooding. Replace the existing 30-in pipe with 3,381 feet of new 30-in pipe with a steeper slope. Replace the inlet near Holliday Drive with 55 feet of 24-in pipe. This project is in coordination with project P32. $746,000 15 Medium P27 40 Bike path along Highway 191 from 990 North to 1100 North and from 1400 North to 1700 North The City has identified that runoff from the uphill side of the bike path overtops the path and causes erosion on the downhill side of the path. Install a ditch behind the walking trail with drainage pipe crossing under the trail where needed. This project may be completed by Moab personnel. $22,000 16 Medium Page 141 of 235 City of Moab 5-9 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P39 71 Pedestrian walkway under 500 West by Mill Creek The City has noted that surcharges in the pipeline back up and flood the walkway. Install 142 feet of 36-in pipe from the existing storm drain at the east side of the pedestrian crossing to Mill Creek. The existing outfall should remain in operation after this project to help alleviate flooding. $43,000 17 Medium P40 72 Moab City Public Works parking lot and yard The City has noted that the storm drainage in the Public Works parking lot does not adequately connect to a downstream conveyance and therefore backs up, causing flooding in the yard. Install 294 feet of 24-in pipe from the existing storm drain inlet in the Public Works parking lot to the existing storm drain on the southwest side of the McLaughlin property (200 South 426 West). $40,000 18 Medium P32 52 Hale Avenue from the northwest corner to 400 North The City and model have identified capacity issues and flooding in this location. Install 656 feet of 24-in pipe in Hale Ave from the existing inlet to project P18 in 400 North. The existing storm drain in Hale Avenue is a private facility. $116,000 19 Medium P33 54 250 North 300 East The City has noted sediment deposits in this area. Install curb and gutter, drive approach, and regrade hillside to reduce rockfall and debris. $10,000 20 Medium P36 67 Dirt road extending from Rosetree Lane east behind the residential lots along the north side of Arches Drive The ditch and dirt road experience significant erosion during storm which is deposited in the bubble up and curb and gutter in Rosetree Lane. Regrade the road, install a roadside ditch with erosion control measures (rip-rap), replace the bubble up in Rosetree lane with a higher invert elevation so debris and sediment doesn’t fill the outlet. $31,000 21 Medium P37 68 Center Street from 650 East to 500 East The City has identified that the ditch on the south side of the road experiences flooding and erosion. In coordination with local property owners, stabilize the ditch with erosion control measures and install a diversion structure to convey excess flows in the curb and gutter without the erosion associated with the higher flows. $4,000 22 Medium Page 142 of 235 City of Moab 5-10 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P38 69 The intersection of Bowling Alley Lane and Bittle Lane Flows in the curb and gutter on the west side of Bowling Alley Lane overtop Bittle Lane diagonally and flood the driveway west of the storm drain inlet north of Bittle Lane. Regrade Bittle lane to provide a crosspan that directs flows to the existing storm drain inlet north of Bowling Alley Lane. Coordination with Grand County may be required. $6,000 23 Medium P17 23 From the westernmost ends of Carlos Court and Juan Court to 500 West then to the inlet on the east side of 500 West The storm drains from the downhill cul-de-sacs do not have the capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Install 396 feet of 24-in pipe from Carlos Court to 500 West along the property lines then south to the nearest inlet on 500 West. Install 300 feet of 24-in pipe from Juan Court to 500 West along the property lines then north to the nearest inlet on 500 West. $110,000 24 Low P5 6 Existing storm drain alignment from Loveridge Drive to Locust Lane Modeling efforts indicate that the existing 15-in pipe does not have capacity to convey the 100-year flows from the downhill drive. Replace the existing 15-in pipe with 300 feet of 24-in pipe. $40,000 25 Low P13 15 From Nob Hill (300 North) and Main Street to 300 North and 100 West Modeling efforts have shown capacity issues at this location which likely create velocities that promote sediment deposits. Replace the existing 18-in pipe and open channel with 571 feet of 24-in pipe from Main Street to 100 West along the existing storm drain alignment. $106,000 29 Low P34 NA Stewart Lane from 350 North to Mill Creek This area was identified in the previous master plan as a potential development. Install 657 feet of 24-in from 350 North to 275 North and 844 feet of 24-in pipe from 275 North to Mill Creek. This project may be completed in coordination with future development. $273,000 39 Low P11 NA Pear Tree Lane from approximately 1000 East to the western end of the Lane then southwest to Pack Creek This area was identified in the previous master plan as a potential development. Install 1,294 feet of 24-in pipe from 1000 East to 840 East. Install 1,053 feet of 24-in pipe from 840 East to the western end of Pear Tree Lane. Install 422 feet of 30-in pipe from the western end of Pear Tree Lane southwest to Pack Creek. $382,000 40 Low Moab City Facilities Projects Subtotal $6,229,6812 Grand County Facilities Page 143 of 235 City of Moab 5-11 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P6 7 Existing storm drain alignment from 1400 Spanish Valley Drive to the existing outfall on Pack Creek Modeling efforts have indicated that the existing 18-in pipe does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Replace the existing 18-in pipe, 24-in pipe and 28-in pipe with 753 feet of 36-in pipe. This may include County facilities. $185,000 26 Low P7 8 Culvert across Murphy Lane at approximately 1320 Murphy Lane Modeling efforts have indicated that the 18-in pipe does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Replace the existing 18-in pipe with 70 feet of 24-in pipe. This may include County deficiencies. $13,000 27 Low P8 9 From 123 Arbor Drive to Pack Creek Modeling efforts have indicated that the 18-in pipe doesn’t have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows from the downhill cul-de-sac. Replace the existing 18-in pipe with 218 feet of 24-in pipe. This may include County facilities. $35,000 28 Low P19 27 Kane Creek Road 0.97 miles along the road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The existing culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Upsize the existing culvert to 35 feet of 24-in pipe. This facility may be a County facility. $7,000 30 Low P20 29 Kane Creek Road 1.27 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The existing culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Upsize existing culvert to 32 feet of 24-in pipe. This facility may be a County facility. $6,000 31 Low P21 30 Kane Creek Road 1.33 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The existing culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Upsize existing culvert to 72 feet of 42-in pipe. This facility may be a County facility. $26,000 32 Low P22 31 Kane Creek Road 1.61 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The existing culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Upsize existing culvert to 32 feet of 36-in pipe. This is a County facility. $10,000 33 Low P23 33 Kane Creek Road 1.88 miles along the Road from 500 West towards the Colorado River The existing culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Upsize existing culvert to 59 feet of 48-in pipe. This is a County facility. $24,000 34 Low Page 144 of 235 City of Moab 5-12 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P29 3, 45, 60 Jefferson Street and Boulder Avenue Boulder Avenue does not have inlets or buried storm drain facilities. Storm drains along Main Street and Bittle Lane experience sediment deposits. Install inlets on the 24-in pipe that crosses Boulder Avenue to intercept curb and gutter flow. May include 53 feet of 24-in pipe. This may be a County facility. $16,000 38 Low Grand County Facilities Projects Subtotal $322,000 UDOT Facilities P14 (See also Project P14 in the Moab Facilities Section) 17, 18, 19, 20, 50 Cermak Road, Highway 191 (Main Street) from 488 North to 500 West, undeveloped area from Stewart Canyon to Highway 191, 500 West and Highway 191 to approximately 1450 West and 1050 North Flows from Stewart Canyon cause flooding down Cermak Road, and along Highway 191. The existing canal and pipe system along Highway 191 does not have an outlet or designated downstream conveyance. The abandoned canal acts as a retention facility and experiences overflows during large events. The storm drain system from Hampton Inn dead ends in Highway 191. During storm events, runoff sheet flows over the highway and floods 400 North. Install 311 feet of 30-in pipe in Main Street from 488 North to 570 North (to existing inlets). Install 555 feet of 36-in pipe in Main Street from 570 North to 600 North. Install 524 feet of 30-in pipe in Cermak Road to Main Street. Install 545 feet of 42-in pipe in Highway 191 from 600 North to the existing 48-in storm drain across Highway 191. Install 1,043 feet of 24-in pipe from the Stewart Canyon debris basin southwest to the existing 48-in culvert crossing Highway 191. Install 2,415 feet of 54-in pipe along Highway 191 from the referenced 48-in culvert to 980 North. Install 221 feet of 48-in by 60-in box culvert along Highway 191 from 980 North to 500 West. Install 216 feet of 48-in by 60-in box culvert across Highway 191 to 500 West. Install 1,170 feet of 48-in by 60-in box culvert along the property line at approximately 1010 North from 500 West to 643 West. Install a detention basin with approximately 20 acre-feet of volume with a 24-in outlet approximately 60 feet long. Sizing of the detention basin may vary depending on the outlet structure and capacity. This deficiency includes UDOT facilities. Large conveyances may change in the final design but should retain the capacity of the conveyances listed in the CIP. The design storm is the 50-year storm to match UDOT criteria. $1,894,3193 (UDOT portion) 6 High Page 145 of 235 City of Moab 5-13 Storm Water Master Plan Project ID Deficiency ID Location Problem Description Preferred Solution Project ($) Priority P15 20, 56 Highway 191 from near Arrowhead Lane to 1100 North The City and model have identified that the existing culvert across Highway 191 lacks adequate capacity. The elevations at the culvert cause low velocities in the open ditch alongside the highway which promotes sediment deposition. Install 120 feet of 42-in pipe across Highway 191 along the same trajectory as the existing storm drain along Arrowhead Lane. Lower the existing invert of the bottom manhole along Arrowhead Lane in order to alleviate surcharging conditions due to hydraulic jumps in the existing pipeline. Install a new 4-ft wide by 3-ft deep trapezoidal ditch along Highway 191 from the new 42-inch culvert to the natural drainage near 1100 North. This would be a UDOT facility. $97,000 11 Medium P24 34 Highway 191 at approximately 1200 North The existing culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Upsize existing culvert to 122 feet of 36-in pipe. This is a UDOT facility. $38,000 35 Low P25 38 Highway 128 approximately 0.49 miles along the Highway from Highway 191 The existing culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Upsize existing culvert to 52 feet of 36-in pipe. This is a County facility. $17,000 36 Low P26 39 Highway 128 approximately 0.78 miles along the Highway from Highway 191 The existing culvert does not have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flows. Upsize existing culvert to 52 feet of 36-in pipe. This is a County facility. $24,000 37 Low UDOT Facilities Projects Subtotal $2,070,319 Capital Improvements Total Cost $8,622,000 1. Project Cost only includes the Moab portion of the project as discussed below. 2. Moab Facilities Project Subtotal does not include the cost of Project P12B or P28B. Subtotal cost with Project P12B and P28B without project P12A or P28A is equal to $6,770,681. 3. Project Cost only includes the UDOT portion of the project as discussed below. Page 146 of 235 #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ KJ P18 30"P1454'' P11 24''P3424''P936"P28A/B24''P1424''P424''P636''P14 48''x60''P2 7Eros i on Cont r ol P12A 48'' P30 30" P13 24''P1436' 'P1442''P3224''P1430''P 1 1 3 0 ''P 2 6 0 "P 1 0 3 0 " P3 24''P12A24''P12A 42''P524''P1724''P40 24''P124''P28A/B36''P824''P1548' 'x36' ' P28A/B 30''P12A36''P424"P37 Line DitchP3115"P3936"P 2 4 3 6 ''P1542''P 3 3 C &G P36Erosion Control P 7 2 4 ''P35 30"P3524''P1824' ' P29 24"P27Er osi on Cont r ol P1430' 'P12A24''P1 42 4 ''Mill C r e ekPack C re e kMAIN STUS 191400 N 500 WMILLCREEK DR200 S KANECREEKBLVDCENTER ST SPANISH VALLEY DR 200 SP12A30''P 1 6 2 4 ''P38CrosspanP4StructureP28A/B24''P28A/B24''P12A 24''P3524''City of Moab Storm Water Master Plan Capital Improvement Plan FIGURE 5-1 Legend Grand County CIP Moab CIP UDOT CIP UDOT/Moab CIP Moab Detention CIP UDOT/Moab Detention CIP Modeled Node KJ Detention Basin #*Outfall Modeled Conveyances Streams 0 700 1,400350 Feet ¦Document Path: H:\Projects\380 - Moab City\04.100 - storm water master plan\Plan Update\GIS\Figure5_1CIPUpdate.mxdDate: 10/3/2017#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*P3424''P18 30" P21 42'' P23 48''Colorado RiverM ill Cree k KANE CREEK BLVD P1 9 2 4 '' P22 36'' P20 24'' #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*US 191MAI N STP2 7Eros i on Cont r ol P2636''Colorado River P2536''#* #* #* #*#* P12B 42''P12B30''M illCreek P12B24''P12B24''Alternate Project P12B Page 147 of 235 City of Moab 5-14 Storm Water Master Plan FACILITY OWNERSHIP The CIP is separated into three divisions: Moab facilities, Grand County facilities, and UDOT facilities. Moab facilities were determined to be parts of the storm drain system within the municipal boundaries of Moab that are part of a larger storm drain network. Grand county facilities are those storm drains that are outside of Moab boundaries or appear to just be culverts under county roads. UDOT facilities are culverts under Highway 191 that are not connected to a larger network of storm drains. Storm drains are often not as well maintained as water or sewer facilities and are sometimes “inherited” as Cities expand, incorporate, or irrigation facilities are devoted to storm drainage. Therefore, it is recommended that the ownership of the facilities included in the CIP be verified with the various entities before proceeding with project designs. STEWART CANYON COST SHARING Project P14 deals with flows from Stewart Canyon and from the northeast side of Highway 191, on the north end of Moab. UDOT maintains several culverts that cross Highway 191. The outfall for the culverts appears to be an abandoned canal that runs on the south side of Highway 191. The canal has since been partially filled and is no longer used for irrigation or storm water conveyance. Moab facilities do not exist in the area to receive the flow from the UDOT culverts. Flows into the abandoned canal either evaporate, are infiltrated into the ground, or back up to a depth where the runoff overtops the canal at Mivida Drive or flows backwards through the UDOT culverts to the north side of Highway 191 to flow northwest along the highway. Both UDOT and Moab have an interest in managing runoff from the north side of Highway 191 in order to prevent flooding across Highway 191 as well as prevent the flooding of private residences on the south side of Highway 191. Cost sharing is recommended for the project to represent the interests of both Moab City and UDOT as well as to represent the responsibilities of UDOT to convey natural flows coming to the highway and the responsibility of Moab to manage those flows as they enter Moab facilities. Preliminary estimates of cost sharing use flows and volumes from subbasins tributary to Moab Storm Drain facilities as compared to flows and volumes tributary to UDOT facilities. It is reasonable to expect UDOT facilities to convey the natural runoff flows from undeveloped areas across the highway whether the runoff originated from Grand County land, Moab land, or UDOT properties. When UDOT installs a culvert across a new road that intersects a natural drainage it is sized for the entire flow and UDOT does not normally assess a financial responsibility to landowners based on where undeveloped runoff originated. Tributary areas from Stewart Canyon are difficult to determine due to modifications the private property owner has made to the area. Therefore, the cost sharing recommendations in this master plan are conceptual and the general concepts should be used as a starting point in discussions between Moab City and UDOT on the project’s cost sharing. Pipe size is often determined by the expected peak flow. It is recommended that the cost of conveyances be proportionate to the peak flow to the culverts for UDOT and to the peak flow to Moab facilities for Moab. Moab City asked HAL to generate a cost sharing percentage for the project in studies separate from this master plan. The studies used the methodology described above and show approximately 41% of the cost of the conveyances would be the responsibility of Moab City, while the remaining 59% would be the responsibility of UDOT. Detention basins are sized based on the expected runoff volume. It is therefore recommended that the cost of the detention basin be based on the volume of runoff historically tributary to UDOT culverts and Moab facilities. Using the proportionate volume method, approximately 44% of the cost of the Page 148 of 235 City of Moab 5-15 Storm Water Master Plan detention basin would be the responsibility of Moab City while the remaining 56% would be the responsibility of UDOT. Final cost sharing will need to be determined by Moab City and UDOT. Again, the approach discussed above is a preliminary example. SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Costs of the Capital Improvements are summarized in Table 5-2. Table 5-2 Capital Improvement Plan Summary Project ID Range Projects Cost ($) P1-5, P9-14, P16-18, P27-28, P30-40 Moab City Facilities $6,229,681 P6-8, P19-23, P29 Grand County Facilities $322,000 P14-15, P24-26 UDOT Facilities $2,070,319 Total Cost $8,622,000 OPERATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS Minimum Pipe Diameter Some of the storm drain pipes in Moab are 15 inches in diameter or less. Modeling of the system shows that generally the 15-inch pipes do not have the capacity to convey the 10-year flows. The City has selected a diameter of 24 inches as the standard minimum for City facilities. Inventory This master plan included a survey of Moab storm drain facilities. It is recommended that the City maintain and update the GIS inventory of the storm drainage system as the system is replaced or expanded. Updates should occur as information about additional land use, conveyance, capacity, and detention data become available. Irrigation and Storm Drain Conveyances Some areas of the Moab Storm Drainage System have conveyances which have historically served as both storm drain facilities and irrigation facilities. Several of the irrigation facilities have been abandoned in favor of a pressurized irrigation system. Therefore, it is recommended that an ongoing effort be made to separate storm drainage conveyances from irrigation conveyances in addition to the recommended projects in the Capital Improvement Plan. Watch and Maintenance Recommendations In addition to the existing storm drainage system maintenance, it is recommended that deficiencies 21, 55, 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, and 70 be addressed through more frequent maintenance. A maintenance schedule for these deficiencies could include removing debris, sediment, and clearing weed growth as needed to keep the drainage facilities functioning or until corrective CIP projects can be completed. Several of the detention/debris basins are on private property. These detention basins significantly impact the Storm Water System and failure or improper function of the basins could cause flooding within the City. Agreements should be made with the property owners to allow City personnel to maintain the detention basins. The basins should be evaluated annually to Page 149 of 235 City of Moab 5-16 Storm Water Master Plan determine if sediment deposits are affecting the capacity of the basin, and if so, maintenance efforts should include removing sediment. Key detention basins to be evaluated include the Walker Canyon Detention Basin, White Canyon Detention Basin, Johnson Canyon Detention Basin, Tusher Canyon Detention Basin, McKay Place Detention Basin, the Detention Basin southwest of Highway 191 and Millcreek Drive, and the Doc Allen Drive Detention Basins. Debris basins at Stewart Canyon and northeast of 500 West and Highway 191 should also be periodically evaluated. Deficiencies identified as not warranting action include 5, 10, 25, 28, 32, 35, 36, 37, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, and 53. These deficiencies should be monitored for future flooding. If conditions become unacceptable, a project should be added to the CIP to remedy the deficiency. Storm Water Quality Management Plan Moab is not listed as an MS4 on the Utah MS4 List (01/01/15), but expansion of the MS4 list, growth of Moab, and expansion of storm water quality regulations are all expected. Therefore, in the future it is likely that Moab will be required to develop a Storm Water Management Plan in accordance with Utah’s Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) permit. Chapter 6 has been included as a review of requirements included in the UPDES permit. The included chapter does NOT constitute a Storm Water Management Plan and is provided to help the City develop the best management practices and ordinances to smoothly transition to a functioning Storm Water Management Plan. Storm Water Master Plan Updates The Storm Water Master Plan should be periodically reviewed and updated dependent upon change and new development, at least every 5 years. Page 150 of 235 City of Moab 6-1 Storm Water Master Plan CHAPTER 6 – STORM WATER QUALITY STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS Moab is not included in the Utah MS4 list and is not required to meet UPDES Permit UTR090000 standards. However, Moab should expect a future inclusion on the MS4 list through population growth and expansion of the program. Therefore, this chapter is included to help Moab begin to implement some of the practices and recommended ordinances required in the UPDES Permit in order to reduce the required time, effort, and resources when the City is required to meet the permit standards. The following sections are compiled based on information from the EPA, UPDES UTS000001 Permit, and the UPDES UTR090000 Permit. The UPDES permit is intended to reduce discharge of pollutants through the storm drainage system to the maximum extent possible (MEP). The permit helps cities reduce pollutants by requiring a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) and offering suggestions of best management practices (BMPs). This Storm Water Master Plan does NOT constitute a Storm Water Management Plan. Public Education and Outreach on Storm Water Impacts A SWMP must include a “a public education and outreach program to promote behavior change by the public to reduce water quality impacts associated with pollutants in storm water runoff and illicit discharges” (Utah Division of Water Quality, 2013). Educational materials are available from the State and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to assist the City in preparing a public education program. The public education program should inform the following four audiences about the steps they can take to reduce storm water pollution: 1. Residents and households. 2. Businesses, institutions, and commercial facilities. 3. Developers and contractors. 4. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) industrial facilities. Steps to reduce pollution may include informing the audiences about the proper use and disposal of landscape and garden chemicals, including fertilizers and pesticides, maintenance of septic systems, protecting and restoring riparian vegetation, proper disposal of swimming pool water, proper management of pet waste, benefits of on-site infiltration of storm water, proper use of salt or other deicing materials, proper management of parking lots, proper management of dumpsters, proper storage of materials, and properly disposing of used motor oil or household hazardous wastes. Effective programs should be evaluated to show evidence that the defined goal of the program was achieved. The City should include written documentation or rationale as to why selected BMPs were chosen for the public education and outreach program. Some suggestions on how to educate businesses, developers, and City staff are provided below. 1. Commercial/Industrial. Provide ongoing education and training to existing and new commercial/industrial entities regarding Best Management Practices they can or are required to implement to minimize pollution of storm water. Page 151 of 235 City of Moab 6-2 Storm Water Master Plan 2. In house training of City staff. This group may include the City’s development review committee, plan reviewers, inspectors, regulators, engineers, members of the planning commission and City Council, etc. 3. Certification programs for developers and contractors who wish to develop within the City. This would afford the City an opportunity to educate developers and contractors about the regulatory requirements, with which they must comply, in order to develop within the City limits. The City may also look to State and Federal agencies, professional associations, general contractor associations, and/or conferences and seminars as a means to educate individuals and entities within this category. Public Involvement/Participation The City must, at a minimum, comply with State and local public notice requirements when implementing a public involvement/participation program. EPA recommends that the public participation process should make efforts to reach out and engage all economic and ethnic groups. Opportunities for members of the public to participate in program development and implementation include serving as citizen representatives on a local storm water management panel, attending public hearings, working as citizen volunteers to educate other individuals about the program, assisting in program coordination with other pre-existing programs, or participating in volunteer monitoring efforts. Specific time periods for public review of the SWMP are required in the Permit. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) The City must develop, implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges into the City’s storm drainage system. The City must: 1. Develop, if not already completed, a storm drainage system map, showing the location of all outfalls and the names and location of all waters of the United States that receive discharges from those outfalls. The City’s GIS based facilities inventory map meets this requirement. 2. To the extent allowable under State or local law, effectively prohibit, through ordinance, or other regulatory mechanism, non-storm water discharges into the storm drainage system and implement appropriate enforcement procedures and actions, including an escalation of enforcement chart showing steps to enforce City Code in various stages of noncompliance. 3. Have legal authority to carry out the IDDE program. 4. Develop and implement a plan to detect and address non-storm water discharges, including illegal dumping, to the storm drainage system. Include an inspection schedule for priority areas of the city with the IDDE plan and inspect at least 20% of the areas annually. 5. Inform public employees, businesses, and the general public through the public education program of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste. 6. Promote or provide services for household hazardous waste collection. 7. Publicize a hotline to report spills or illegal dumping. 8. Hold annual staff trainings for those individuals involved in the IDDE plan. EPA recommends that the plan to detect and address illicit discharges include the following four components: procedures for locating priority areas likely to have illicit discharges; procedures Page 152 of 235 City of Moab 6-3 Storm Water Master Plan for tracing the source of an illicit discharge; procedures for removing the source of the discharge; and procedures for program evaluation and assessment. The City shall document the basis for the prioritization of the IDDE areas. Prioritization may include consideration of the following suggestions: • Areas with older infrastructure which are more likely to have illicit connections. • Industrial, commercial, or mixed use areas. • Areas with a history of past illicit discharges. • Areas with a history of illegal dumping. • Areas with onsite sewage disposal systems • Areas with older sewer lines or with a history of sewer overflows or cross- connections. • Areas upstream of sensitive waterbodies. To ensure the effectiveness of this plan, the City should consider implementing additional BMPs which include: 1. The City should maintain a database of all industrial users. 2. Coordinate activities and inspections of City staff responsible for regulating pre- treatment processes for the identification of illicit connections. Particular plans should be developed for monitoring “dry weather” flows for determination of illicit connections. The plans should include procedures for monitoring of both quantity and quality. The City should review the EPA guidance document entitled “Draft Manual of Practice Identification of Illicit Connections” for additional information. 3. Maintain records and database of all illicit connections and action taken. 4. Review all new development plans for compliance with all applicable regulations. Provide training of all plan reviewers. Enforcement of illicit discharges is most easily controlled through the creation of an ordinance which effectively prohibits illicit discharges into the storm drainage system and implements appropriate enforcement procedures, to the extent allowable under State law. Illicit discharge education actions may include storm drain stenciling; a program to promote, publicize, and facilitate public reporting of illicit connections or discharges; and distribution of public outreach materials stressing the importance of recycling programs and eliminating sources of potential hazards such as motor oil, antifreeze, pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers. Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control The City must develop, implement, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in any storm water runoff to the City’s storm drainage system from construction activities that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre. Reduction of storm water discharges from construction activity disturbing less than one acre must be included in the program if that construction activity is part of a larger common plan of development or sale that would disturb one acre or more. This includes projects proposed by the City. The City’s program must include the development, implementation and enforcement of, at a minimum: 1. An ordinance or other regulator mechanism to require erosion and sediment controls, as well as sanctions to ensure compliance, to the extent allowable Page 153 of 235 City of Moab 6-4 Storm Water Master Plan under State or local law. The ordinance shall at a minimum be equivalent to the technical requirements set forth in the UPDES Storm Water General Permit for Construction Activities, UTR300000. 2. Require Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP), for all construction sites. 3. Develop and implement a written enforcement strategy, including specific processes to obtain compliance from violators and documentation tracking of all enforcement actions. 4. Procedures for pre-construction SWPPP review which incorporate consideration of potential water quality impacts. Incorporate into the review an evaluation of opportunities for use of low impact design (LID) and green infrastructure when possible. 5. Procedures for site inspection and enforcement of control measures. Clearly identify the official responsible for inspection and enforcement of the SWPPP. Inspection forms with their schedules can be found on the Division of Water Quality’s webpage. 6. Ensure that staff whose primary job duties are related to storm water pollution prevention are trained annually regarding these job duties. 7. Keep the proper records for all construction activities that disturb more than one acre or are part of a project that disturbs more than one acre of land. Records shall be kept for five years or until the project is complete, whichever is longer. Additional items which may be considered for inclusion as effective Best Management Practices (BMPs) include, but are not limited to: 1. Ensuring that all storm drains are properly marked to reduce the chance of inadvertent disposal of hazardous products. 2. Providing appropriate educational and training measures for construction site operators; 3. Requiring construction site owners, developers and contractors to attend educational seminars and/or a pre-construction meeting where the previously approved water quality plan is addressed to discuss BMPs which will be used, discuss inspection schedules for verification of compliance, and penalties for failure to comply; 4. Cleaning the storm drainage system within work areas immediately following any construction or repair activities to remove sediments and/or debris; 5. Informing all employees and off-site contractors of the need for good housekeeping. The concentrated effort of a group of individuals can be undone by the careless or unknowing action of a single person. Long-Term Storm Water Management in New Development and Redevelopment (Post- Construction Storm Water Management) The objective of this control measure is for the hydrology associated with new development to mirror the hydrology of the undeveloped site or to improve the hydrology of a site to be redeveloped. The City must develop, implement, and enforce a program to address storm water runoff from new development and redevelopment projects that disturb greater than or equal to one acre, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale, that discharge into the storm drainage system. The City’s program must ensure that controls are in place that would prevent or minimize water quality impacts. The City must: Page 154 of 235 City of Moab 6-5 Storm Water Master Plan 1. Develop an ordinance that requires long-term post-construction storm water controls at new development and redevelopment sites. The ordinance shall meet the technical requirements set forth in the UPDES Storm Water General Permit for Construction Activities UTR300000. 2. Develop an enforcement strategy for long-term post-construction storm water controls that includes specific processes and sanctions to obtain compliance from violators. Document how BMPs were selected, which pollutant was targeted for the BMP, and the technical basis to support the claims for the selected BMPs. 3. Develop and implement strategies which include a combination of structural and/or non-structural best management practices (BMPs) appropriate for the City. Non-structural BMPs are preventive actions using management and source controls (policies and ordinances that result in protection of natural resources and prevention of runoff). Structural BMPs include storage practices (wet ponds and extended outlet structures), filtration practices (grassed swales, sand filters and filter strips), etc. 4. Develop procedures for site plan review. 5. Develop procedures for site inspection and enforcement of control measures in accordance with the schedule defined in the UPDES Permit Number UTS000001. 6. Provide adequate training for all staff involved in post construction storm water management. 7. Maintain an inventory of all structural post construction storm water control measures installed. 8. By March 1, 2019, require new developments that disturb at least one acre to implement BMPs to prevent the off-site discharge of runoff from all rainfall events less than or equal to the 90th percentile event. The City must develop hydrologic methods for calculating the volume to be retained on-site. EPA recommends that the BMPs chosen be appropriate for the local community; minimize water quality impacts; and attempt to maintain pre-development runoff conditions. In choosing appropriate BMPs, the EPA encourages the City to participate in locally-based watershed planning efforts which attempt to involve a diverse group of stakeholders including interested citizens. EPA recommends the adoption of a planning process that identifies the municipality’s program goals (e.g., minimize water quality impacts resulting from post-construction runoff from new development and redevelopment), implementation strategies (e.g., adopt a combination of structural and/or non-structural BMPs), operation and maintenance policies and procedures, and enforcement procedures. EPA recommends that the City ensure the appropriate implementation of the structural BMPs by considering some or all of the following: pre- construction review of BMP designs; inspections during construction to verify BMPs are built as designed; post-construction inspection and maintenance of BMPs; and penalty provisions for the noncompliance with design, construction or operation and maintenance. Storm water technologies are constantly being improved, and EPA recommends that the City’s requirements be responsive to these changes, developments, or improvements in control technologies. Structural storm water controls may include: • Infiltration • Evapotranspiration • Rainwater harvesting • Rain gardens • Permeable pavement • Vegetated swales Page 155 of 235 City of Moab 6-6 Storm Water Master Plan Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Operation and maintenance is an integral component of the City’s storm water management program. The City must develop and implement an operation and maintenance program that includes a training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations. Using training materials that are available from the EPA, the State, or other organizations, the program must include employee training to prevent and reduce storm water pollution from activities such as park and open space maintenance, fleet and building maintenance, new construction and land disturbances, and storm water system maintenance. Properly developed and implemented operation and maintenance programs reduce the risk of water quality problems. The UPDES requires that, at a minimum, the City include the following in their maintenance program: 1. Maintain a current inventory of municipal owned or operated facilities and storm water controls that may include composting facilities, equipment storage and maintenance facilities, fuel farms, hazardous waste disposal facilities, hazardous waste handling and transfer facilities, incinerators, landfills, landscape maintenance on municipal property, materials storage yards, pesticide storage facilities, public buildings including libraries, police stations, fire stations, etc., public parking lots, public golf courses, public swimming pools, public works yards, recycling facilities, salt storage facilities, solid waste handling and transfer facilities, street repair and maintenance sites, vehicle storage and maintenance yards, and owned or maintained structural storm water controls. 2. Assess the inventory required above for their potential to discharge the following pollutants: sediment, nutrients, metals, hydrocarbons, pesticides, chlorides, and trash. Additional pollutants that could also be found in storm water discharge should be assessed as well. 3. Identify which facilities identified above are “high priority” or have a high potential to generate storm water pollutants. 4. Each “high priority” facility shall develop procedures which include BMPs meant to protect water quality and reduce discharge of pollutants. Further requirements for each facility’s procedures can be seen in the UPDES Permit Number UTS000001. 5. Any third party conducting municipal maintenance shall be held to the same standards as the City in regard to storm water controls and good housekeeping practices. 6. An inspection program shall be implemented with “high priority” facilities having a visual inspection for leaks or spills, “high priority” facilities having a quarterly comprehensive inspection, and a quarterly visual inspection of storm water discharges. 7. The City shall develop and implement a process to assess the water quality impacts in the design of all new flood management structural controls that are associated with the City. This process shall include consideration of controls that can be used to minimize the impacts to site water quality and hydrology while still meeting project objectives. Existing flood management structural controls shall be assessed to determine whether changes or additions should be made to improve water quality. 8. Public construction projects shall comply with the same requirements applied to private projects. Page 156 of 235 City of Moab 6-7 Storm Water Master Plan 9. The City shall provide annual training for all employees who have primary construction, operation, or maintenance job functions that are likely to impact storm water quality. 10. Maintenance activities, maintenance schedules, and log-term inspection procedures for structural and non-structural storm water controls to reduce floatables and other pollutants discharged from the storm drainage system; 11. Controls for reducing or eliminating the discharge of pollutants from streets, roads, highways, municipal parking lots, maintenance and storage yards, fleet or maintenance shops with outdoor storage areas, salt/sand storage locations and snow disposal areas operated by the City, and waste transfer stations; 12. Procedures for properly disposing of waste removed from the separate storm drainage system and areas listed above (such as dredge spoil, accumulated sediments, floatables, and other debris); 13. Ways to ensure that new flood management projects assess the impacts on water quality and examine existing projects for incorporating additional water quality protection devices or practices. In addition to those elements listed above, the City should work towards implementing the following items: 1. Supporting curb side recycling efforts; 2. Encouraging residential clean-up days; 3. Implementing a program to distribute and collect leaf bags; 4. Continuing street sweeping program for removal of debris and sediment; 5. Reviewing City projects for compliance with BMPs. Reviewing and Updating SWMPs In addition to the six minimum control measures referenced above, the City must: 1. Conduct an annual review of the SWMP in conjunction with preparation of the annual report. 2. Make changes to the SWMP with written documentation provided to the Division of Water Quality. 3. Keep records required by the permit at least 5 years. 4. Make records and a description of the storm water management program available to the public upon request. 5. Submit an annual report to the Division of Water Quality using the report form provided on the Division’s website. Page 157 of 235 City of Moab R-1 Storm Water Master Plan REFERENCES AGRC (Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center). 2015. Various GIS data layers. http://gis.utah.gov/data/. Bonnin, Geoffrey M., Deborah Martin, Bingzhang Lin, Tye Parzybok, Michael Yekta, and David Riley. 2004. NOAA Atlas 14: Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the United States vol. 1, ver. 5: Semiarid Southwest. Silver Spring, Md.: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/PF_documents/Atlas14_Volume1.pdf. City of Moab. 2016. “History.” Accessed January 2016. http://moabcity.org/index.aspx?nid=101. ENR (Engineering News Record). 2016. Construction Economics. The Construction Resource ENR Engineering News-Record, volume 276 (number 4), pp. 35. Google Earth. 2017. Moab, Utah. © 2017 Google Image Landsat/Copernicus. Google Earth v. 7.1.8.3036 (32-bit). Homer, C.G., J.A. Dewitz, L. Yang, S. Jin, P. Danielson, G. Xian, J. Coulston, N.D. Herold, J.D. Wickham, and K. Megown. 2015. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v. 81, no. 5, p. 345- 354. Linsley, Ray K. and Joseph B. Franzini. 1979. Water-Resources Engineering. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. New York, NY. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2016. Precipitation Frequency Data Server. National Weather Service, Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center. http://dipper.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/. NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). 1986. Technical Release 55: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (TR-55). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1044171.pdf. NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). 2013. Web Soil Survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed December 29, 2015. Rossman, Lewis A. 2010. Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual Version 5.0. Cincinnati, OH: United States Environmental Protection Agency. RSMeans. 2016. Heavy Construction Cost Data 30th annual edition 2016. Rockland, MA.: RSMeans. Simas, M. J., and R.H. Hawkins. 2002. Lag time characteristics in small watersheds in the United States. International Water Resources Engineering Conference Procedures, Vol. 2 pp. 1290-1296. ASCE. Reston, VA. Soil Conservation Service. 1989. Soil Survey of Grand County, Utah Central Part. Proceeding of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada. Page 158 of 235 APPENDIX A Electronic GIS Data Page 159 of 235 APPENDIX B Detention Basin Data Page 160 of 235 Moab Storm Water Master Plan1/2Modeled Detention BasinsNode IDNameMax Elevation4193.4ft4101.45ft4094.98ft4114.20ft3996.61ft4208.51ft4125.9ftMax Depth20.6ft7.21ft8.83ft7.99ft2.21ft2.94ft4.35ftOverflow Elevation4190.6ft4100.27ft4093.53ft4112.35ft3996.61ft4208.51ft4124.9ftOverflow Offset17.8ft6.02ft7.38ft6.14ft2.21ft2.94ft3.35ftBottom Depth4172.8ft4094.24ft4086.16ft4106.22ft3994.40ft4206.87ft4123.3ftMeasure Down0ft0ft0ft0ft0ft1.3ft1.75ftInvert Depth4172.8ft4094.24ft4086.16ft4106.22ft3994.40ft4205.57ft4121.55ftOutlet Orifice Sizeininininin7in2inOutlet Pipe Size18in15in15in15in12in15in15inTributary Acres21.758.2774.2627.36NANANAMax 100 yr Inflow (cfs)8.102.1416.836.54Max Inflow cfs/acre0.370.260.230.24ElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaftftsq ftftftsq ftftftsq ftftftsq ftftftsq ftftftsq ftftftsq ft4172.8004094.24004086.16004106.22003994.40004205.57004121.55004172.808004094.2406004086.1601,1004106.2201,5003994.4005,7374206.871.34564123.31.752934190.617.816,0004100.276.022,2754093.537.385,8004112.356.148,0003996.612.2115,7004208.512.941,6004124.93.351,6334193.420.638,0004101.457.213,0104094.988.839,0004114.207.9911,0003996.612.214208.512.944125.94.352,000Detention Basin AttributesWalker Canyon1085Stor-01 (147)McKay PlaceStor-02 (156)Doc Allen DrStor-3 (171)Doc Allen Dr 2254Hospital SW531Holyoak Ln424Maverick 1Page 161 of 235 Moab Storm Water Master Plan2/2Modeled Detention BasinsNode IDNameMax Elevation4191.33ft4174.7ft4304.3ft4106.2ft4156ftftMax Depth18.59ft34ft8.9ft12.2ft4.5ft0ftOverflow Elevation4191.33ft4170.8ft4303.5ft4104ft4156ftftOverflow Offset18.59ft30.1ft8.1ft10ft4.5ft0ftBottom Depth4172.73ft4152.9ft4298ft4096.5ft4151.5ftftMeasure Down0ft12.2ft2.6ft2.5ft0ft0ftInvert Depth4172.73ft4140.7ft4295.4ft4094ft4151.5ftftOutlet Orifice SizeininininininOutlet Pipe Size18in24in36in24in18in24inTributary Acres77.9533.92215.31218.14NAMax 100 yr Inflow (cfs)21.4114.9327.9689.66Max Inflow cfs/acre0.270.440.130.41ElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaElevationStageAreaftftsq ftftftsq ftftftsq ftftftsq ftftftsq ftftftsq ft4172.73004140.7004295.4004094004151.5000004172.7302,4504152.912.22,60042982.61,0004096.52.55,0004151.501,500002254191.3318.59259,4004160.920.29,7004303.58.117,00041041017,00041564.56,350004191.3318.5924170.830.122,5004304.38.921,0004106.212.225,00041564.5004174.73450,000Detention Basin Attributes120Oak St388Center St913Powerhouse Ln534US 1917201st N St782Parks and RecPage 162 of 235 APPENDIX C Precipitation Data Page 163 of 235 Page 164 of 235 Page 165 of 235 APPENDIX D Typical Lots Data Page 166 of 235 Moab City Storm Water Master PlanTypical Lot Characteristics Summary 0.25 AcreD1380.04.1001/4/2016LotLength12317181920Directly UnconnectedTOTAL Percent PercentPercent PercentOverlandParcel ID Lot Frontage Cover Connected Impervious PerviousLOT LotLotDirectly Conn UnconnectedFlow AreaArea Width Assessment Impervious Area AreaImpervious Pervious Impervious Impervious ImperviousLengthft2ftft2ft2ft2ft2%%%%ft ac01B180001 19,515 295 Good 4,808 7,320 7,387 12,128 38%62% 25% 38% 115 0.44801MNI0027 19,898 118 Good 3,631 3,931 12,336 7,562 62%38% 18% 20% 179 0.45701MUT0042 11,148 95 Good 75 2,495 8,578 2,570 77%23%1% 22% 117 0.25602SGV0003 11,082 104 Good 615 1,565 8,902 2,180 80%20%6% 14% 105 0.25402SSH0009 10,929 243 Good 592 2,794 7,543 3,386 69%31%5% 26% 88 0.25101POR0016 3,931 94 Good 980 1,282 1,669 2,262 42%58% 25% 33% 63 0.090AVERAGE12,7511585,01561.4%38.6%13.2%25%1110.29AVERAGE 0.29 acUnconn Imp 98Good Fair PoorCNCNCNGoodFairPoor39496856.263.376.861697971.877.584.574798681.084.589.580848985.388.191.6Other Lots01MNI0059 4219.6 128 Poor0 640 3579.57008 6400.151674220 0.15167422 64.000Weighted CN with ConditionC Soil CN Weighted AveD Soil CN Weighted AveA Soil CN Weighted AveB Soil CN Weighted AveCNWeighted CN AveConditionTR 55 Open SpacePage 167 of 235 Moab City Storm Water Master PlanTypical Lot Characteristics Summary 0.75 Acre380.04.1001/4/2016LotLength12317181920Directly UnconnectedTOTAL Percent Percent Percent PercentOverlandParcel ID Lot Frontage Cover Connected Impervious PerviousLOT Lot Lot Directly Conn UnconnectedFlowArea Width Assessment Impervious Area AreaImpervious Pervious Impervious Impervious ImperviousLengthft2ftft2ft2ft2ft2% %%%ft010350007 43,500 132 Fair 1,553 3,793 38,154 5,346 88% 12%4% 9% 325020080145 35,345 0 Poor 0 1,771 33,574 1,771 95% 5%0% 5% 25320080082 33,735 124 Fair 3,585 2,355 27,795 5,940 82% 18% 11% 7% 27002IVY0001 32,826 279 Fair 2,231 4,147 26,448 6,378 81% 19%7% 13% 20701MUT0086 28,267 397 Good 3,494 6,279 18,494 9,773 65% 35% 12% 22% 15302SHE0021 22,015 64 Good 851 2,367 18,797 3,218 85% 15%4% 11% 246AVERAGE32,6151665,40482.7%17.3%6.2%11%242AVERAGE 0.75 acUnconn Imp 98GoodFairPoorGoodFairPoor39496846.054.871.561697965.472.481.274798676.881.287.480848982.185.690.1TR 55 Open SpaceConditionWeighted CN with ConditionD Soil CN Weighted AveCNWeighted CN AveA Soil CN Weighted AveB Soil CN Weighted AveC Soil CN Weighted AvePage 168 of 235 Moab City Storm Water Master PlanTypical Lot Characteristics Summary 1 Acre380.04.1001/4/2016LotLength12317181920Directly UnconnectedTOTAL Percent Percent Percent PercentOverlandParcel ID Lot Frontage Cover Connected Impervious PerviousLOT Lot Lot Directly Conn UnconnectedFlowArea Width Assessment Impervious Area AreaImpervious Pervious Impervious Impervious ImperviousLengthft2ftft2ft2ft2ft2% %%%ft020120002 348,961 400 Fair 7,006 24,410 317,545 31,416 91% 9%2% 7% 610030020086 157,801 232 Good 0 3,672 154,129 3,672 98% 2%0% 2% 675010010052 229,802 113 Poor 5,225 2,730 221,847 7,955 97% 3%2% 1% 360020070055 206,865 581 Good 4,199 3,985 198,681 8,184 96% 4%2% 2% 417020120042 187,909 288 Poor 0 6,136 181,773 6,136 97% 3%0% 3% 33201B090004 44,944 410 Good 4,597 9,120 31,227 13,717 69% 31% 10% 20% 230AVERAGE196,04733711,84791.2%8.8%2.8%6%437AVERAGE 4.50 acUnconn Imp 98Good Fair PoorCNCNCNGoodFairPoor39496842.652.069.961697963.370.880.274798675.580.286.780848981.184.989.6TR 55 Open SpaceConditionWeighted CN with ConditionD Soil CN Weighted AveCNWeighted CN AveA Soil CN Weighted AveB Soil CN Weighted AveC Soil CN Weighted AvePage 169 of 235 Moab City Storm Water Master PlanTypical Lot Characteristics Summary Agriculture380.04.1001/4/2016LotLength1 2 317 181920Directly UnconnectedTOTAL Percent Percent Percent PercentOverlandParcel ID Lot Frontage Cover Connected Impervious PerviousLOT Lot Lot Directly Conn UnconnectedFlowArea Width Assessment Impervious Area AreaImpervious Pervious Impervious Impervious ImperviousLengthft2ftft2ft2ft2ft2% %%%ft030350156 136,580 0 Good 00 136,580 0 100% 0%0% 0% 350010350041 559,298 0 Good 00 559,298 0 100% 0%0% 0% 360010350004 43,530 0 Good 00 43,530 0 100% 0%0% 0% 130010010257 297,914 168 Fair 0 5,956 291,958 5,956 98% 2%0% 2% 600020070065 907,924 100 Good 0 9,562 898,362 9,562 99% 1%0% 1% 79601MPT0002 32,645 220 Good 00 32,645 0 100% 0%0% 0% 155AVERAGE329,649812,58699.5%0.5%0.0%1%399AVERAGE 7.57 acUnconn Imp 98Good PoorWeighted CN with ConditionCN CNGoodPoor67 7267.272.178 8178.181.185 8885.188.189 9189.091.0A Soil CN Weighted AveB Soil CN Weighted AveC Soil CN Weighted AveTR 55 Row Crops (SR)CNConditionD Soil CN Weighted AveDescriptionRow cropsRow cropsRow crops, orchard, and trees by ditchWorn pasture and outbuildingsRow crops, creek, and outbuildingsOrchardWeighted CN AvePage 170 of 235 Moab City Storm Water Master PlanTypical Lot Characteristics Summary Commercial380.04.1001/4/2016LotLength12317181920Directly UnconnectedTOTAL Percent Percent Percent PercentOverlandParcel ID Lot Frontage Cover Connected Impervious PerviousLOT Lot Lot Directly Conn UnconnectedFlowArea Width Assessment Impervious Area AreaImpervious Pervious Impervious Impervious ImperviousLengthft2ftft2ft2ft2ft2% %%%ft011260002 43,523 125 Fair 445 10,172 32,906 10,617 76% 24%1% 23%270010350030 80,795 330 Fair 60,514 7,016 13,265 67,530 16% 84% 75% 9%24001MUV0018 9,747 60 Fair 9,74700 9,747 0% 100% 100% 0%16201MUV0019 9,909 64 Fair 9,90900 9,909 0% 100% 100% 0%160010360005 101,215 180 Poor 18,170 5,364 77,681 23,534 77% 23% 18% 5%300020120019 11,105 108 Poor 11,0430 62 11,043 1% 99% 99% 0%99010120005 21,023 226 Good 5,167 6,580 9,276 11,747 44% 56% 25% 31%132010010189 66,384 350 Good 21,005 13,612 31,767 34,617 48% 52% 32% 21%190AVERAGE42,96318022,34332.7%67.3%56.2%11%194AVERAGE 0.99 acUnconn Imp 98Weighted CN with ConditionCNGood6371.97782.38588.38890.5TR 55 Western Desert Urban (natural)CNC Soil CN Weighted AveD Soil CN Weighted AveConditionWeighted CN AveA Soil CN Weighted AveB Soil CN Weighted AvePage 171 of 235 Moab City Storm Water Master PlanTypical Lot Characteristics Summary Mobile Home380.04.1001/4/2016LotLength12317181920Directly UnconnectedTOTAL Percent Percent Percent PercentOverlandParcel ID Lot Frontage Cover Connected Impervious PerviousLOT Lot Lot Directly Conn UnconnectedFlowArea Width Assessment Impervious Area AreaImpervious Pervious Impervious Impervious ImperviousLengthft2ftft2ft2ft2ft2% %%%ft011350003 304,532 78 Poor 34,047 33,648 236,837 67,695 78% 22% 11% 11%525010020010 250,034 2,067 Poor 72,922 67,359 109,753 140,281 44% 56% 29% 27%300010010158 125,870 300 Poor 28,834 20,900 76,136 49,734 60% 40% 23% 17%190020080062 105,472 332 Poor 19,968 7,217 78,287 27,185 74% 26% 19% 7%245010070039 30,976 311 Poor 915 6,464 23,597 7,379 76% 24%3% 21%100AVERAGE163,37761858,45566.5%33.5%17.0%16%272AVERAGE 3.75 acUnconn Imp 98Weighted CN with ConditionCNCN6369.97781.28587.68890.0TR 55 Western Desert Urban (natural)CNC Soil CN Weighted AveD Soil CN Weighted AveConditionWeighted CN AveA Soil CN Weighted AveB Soil CN Weighted AvePage 172 of 235 Moab City Storm Water Master PlanTypical Lot Characteristics Summary Park380.04.1001/4/2016LotLength12317181920Directly UnconnectedTOTAL Percent Percent Percent PercentOverlandParcel ID Lot Frontage Cover Connected Impervious PerviousLOT Lot Lot Directly Conn UnconnectedFlowArea Width Assessment Impervious Area AreaImpervious Pervious Impervious Impervious ImperviousLengthft2ftft2ft2ft2ft2% %%%ft010010108 290,772 1,911 Good 18,873 16,645 255,254 35,518 88% 12%6% 6% 26001B120001 213,261 1,850 Fair 0 21,906 191,355 21,906 90% 10%0% 10% 230010010016 177,814 294 Good 0 5,007 172,807 5,007 97% 3%0% 3% 532010010200 182,392 930 Good 0 2,436 179,956 2,436 99% 1%0% 1% 200010070035 84,973 380 Good 0 20,525 64,448 20,525 76% 24%0% 24% 260AVERAGE189,8431,07317,07889.8%10.2%1.3%9%296AVERAGE 4.36 acUnconn Imp 98Good Fair PoorCNCNCNGoodFairPoor39496844.353.470.761697964.371.680.774798676.280.787.180848981.685.389.8*Use C soil minimumWeighted CN with ConditionWeighted CN AveA Soil CN Weighted AveB Soil CN Weighted AveC Soil CN Weighted AveD Soil CN Weighted AveTR 55 Open SpaceCNConditionPage 173 of 235 Moab City Storm Water Master PlanTypical Lot Characteristics Summary Street380.04.1001/4/2016LotLength12317181920Directly UnconnectedTOTAL Percent Percent Percent PercentOverlandParcel ID Lot Frontage Cover Connected Impervious PerviousLOT Lot Lot Directly Conn UnconnectedFlowArea Width Assessment Impervious Area AreaImpervious Pervious Impervious Impervious ImperviousLengthft2ftft2ft2ft2ft2% %%%ft01PRV0000 70,117Poor 41,8410 28,276 41,841 40% 60% 60% 0%12010010128 9,712Fair 7,3450 2,367 7,345 24% 76% 76% 0%13Hwy191 Donnas Rd69,629Fair 55,5220 14,107 55,522 20% 80% 80% 0%4502SAL0000 21,548Fair 17,8020 3,746 17,802 17% 83% 83% 0%16N of bridge 268,326Poor 241,6180 26,708 241,618 10% 90% 90% 0%40AVERAGE87,86672,82622.5%77.5%77.5%0%25AVERAGE 2.02 acUnconn Imp 98Weighted CN with ConditionCNCN6363.07777.08585.08888.0Weighted CN AveA Soil CN Weighted AveB Soil CN Weighted AveC Soil CN Weighted AveD Soil CN Weighted AveTR 55 Western Desert Urban (natural)CNConditionPage 174 of 235 Moab City Storm Water Master PlanTypical Lot Characteristics Summary Yard380.04.1001/4/2016LotLength12317181920Directly UnconnectedTOTAL Percent Percent Percent PercentOverlandParcel ID Lot Frontage Cover Connected Impervious PerviousLOT Lot Lot Directly Conn UnconnectedFlowArea Width Assessment Impervious Area AreaImpervious Pervious Impervious Impervious ImperviousLengthft2ftft2ft2ft2ft2% %%%ft21XST0015 74,495 289 Poor 5,070 15,362 54,063 20,432 73% 27%7% 21% 310010020025 57,579 0 Poor 0 9,908 47,671 9,908 83% 17%0% 17% 20030060125 123,944 300 Poor 550 5,258 118,136 5,808 95% 5%0% 4% 200020120037 114,939 320 Poor 19,385 19,945 75,609 39,330 66% 34% 17% 17% 380020070008 43,510 420 Poor 0 7,554 35,956 7,554 83% 17%0% 17% 140AVERAGE82,89326616,60679.8%20.2%4.8%15%246AVERAGE 1.90 acUnconn Imp 98Weighted CN with ConditionCNCN6368.67780.48587.18889.6Weighted CN AveA Soil CN Weighted AveB Soil CN Weighted AveC Soil CN Weighted AveD Soil CN Weighted AveTR 55 Western Desert Urban (natural)CNConditionPage 175 of 235 380.04.100 1/4/2016 .Directly Typical HAL suggested Connected Overland Overland Good Fair Poor Impervious Flow Flow Notes Soil CN CN CN %ft ft A 56 63 77 B 72 77 85 C 81 85 90 D 85 88 92 A 46 55 72 B 65 72 81 C 77 81 87 D 82 86 90 A 43 52 70 B 63 71 80 C 75 80 87 D 81 85 90 A 48 57 73 B 67 74 82 C 78 82 88 D 83 86 90 A 67 72 B 78 81 C 85 88 D 89 91 A 72 B 82 C 88 D 91 A 70 B 81 C 88 D 90 A 49 55 63 B 68 72 77 C 79 81 85 D 84 86 88 A 44 53 71 B 64 72 81 C 76 81 87 D 82 85 90 A 63 B 77 C 85 D 88 A 49 55 63 B 68 72 77 C 79 81 85 D 84 86 88 A 69 B 80 C 87 D 90 Myton Family Rock Outcrop MUSYM 39 39 74 77 81 NA Rock Outcrop MUSYM 53 53 82 84 87 NA Rizno Dry Rock Outcrop MUSYM 71 71 63 67 73 NA Rock Outcrop MUSYM 72 72 86 87 89 NA Moenkopie Rock Outcrop MUSYM 73 73 59 64 70 NA Rizno Dry Complex MUSYM 75 75 63 67 73 NA Ustic Torripsamments MUSYM 76 76 83 85 88 NA MUSYM 117 117 94 95 95 NA Residential lots between 0.5 ac and <1 ac Residential lots >=1 ac Average of residential lots above, usually parts of larger lots (<0.08 ac) Vacant lots are parcels not developed, but are in developable areas and platted accordingly 5% 0% 78% 1% 0% Park Street Vacant Yard 17% Residential 0.25 Residential 0.75 Residential over 1 Condition Residential Average Agriculture Mobile Home Typical Lot Characteristics Summary Commercial 13% 6% 56% 0% 7% 3% Residential lots between 0.08 ac and <0.5 ac Moab City Storm Water Master Plan 272 194 399 264 437 242 111 Open 246 25 296 100 200 300 150 250 50 70 300 300 25 150 200 Page 176 of 235 APPENDIX E Cost Information Page 177 of 235 Diameter (in)Diameter (ft)Outside Diameter (ft)MaterialPipe Material & Installation (1)ExcavationImported Bedding InstalledHauling Excess Native Mat'lTrench Backfill Installed (3)Trench Box per Day (2)Average Daily OutputTrench Box CostTop Trench Width (ft)Road Repair Width (ft)Asphalt CostManhole CostInlet CostCurb & Gutter CostUtility RelocationTrench Dewatering (4)Total Cost per Foot of PipeAdjusted Cost per footCost Out of Street (3)Cost Out of Street w/ NO inletsAdjusted Total Cost per FootAdjusted Cost Out of StreetAdjusted Cost Out of Street No Inlets151.3 1.46RCP $39.505.13 26.44 5.02 0.94 210.001501.40 4.86 8.86 35.40 6.25 13.75 14.65 0 0.00 148 138 100 86$137.94 $92.55 $79.78181.5 1.75RCP $47.505.77 29.92 5.88 1.00 210.001321.59 5.15 9.15 36.39 6.25 13.75 14.65 0 0.00 163 151 113 99$151.15 $104.90 $92.13211.8 2.04RCP $51.006.46 33.48 6.80 1.06 210.001201.75 5.44 9.44 37.39 6.25 13.75 14.65 0 0.00 173 160 122 108$160.33 $113.22 $100.45242.0 2.33RCP $57.507.18 37.12 7.79 1.13 210.001002.10 5.73 9.73 38.38 6.25 13.75 14.65 0 0.00 186 173 134 120$172.64 $124.68 $111.90272.3 2.63RCP $83.007.94 40.84 8.84 1.19 210.00922.28 6.03 10.03 39.37 6.25 13.75 14.65 0 0.00 218 203 166 152$202.62 $153.80 $141.03302.5 2.92RCP $91.508.74 44.65 9.96 1.25 210.00882.39 6.32 10.32 40.36 6.25 13.75 14.65 0 0.00 233 217 180 166$216.91 $167.24 $154.46332.8 3.21RCP $108.759.58 48.55 11.14 1.31 210.00802.63 6.61 10.61 41.35 6.25 13.75 14.65 0 0.00 258 240 204 190$239.62 $189.10 $176.32363.0 3.50RCP $126.0010.46 52.52 12.38 1.37 210.00722.92 6.90 10.90 42.34 8.50 13.75 14.65 34 0.00 319 296 230 216$296.46 $213.27 $200.50423.5 4.08RCP $155.0012.33 60.73 15.07 1.49 210.00722.92 7.48 11.48 44.32 8.50 13.75 14.65 34 0.00 363 337 272 258$337.21 $252.32 $239.54484.0 4.67RCP $183.0014.35 69.27 18.01 1.61 210.00643.28 8.07 12.07 46.31 11.35 13.75 14.65 34 0.00 410 381 317 303$380.71 $294.11 $281.34544.5 5.25RCP $222.5016.53 78.15 21.21 1.73 210.00563.75 8.65 12.65 48.29 11.35 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 535 497 371 357$496.65 $344.73 $331.96605.0 5.83RCP $262.0018.87 87.36 24.68 1.85 210.00484.38 9.23 13.23 50.27 16.54 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 597 555 432 418$554.65 $401.02 $388.25665.5 6.42RCP $313.5021.36 96.90 28.40 1.97 210.00444.77 9.82 13.82 52.25 16.54 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 667 619 500 486$619.45 $464.12 $451.35726.0 7.00RCP $365.0024.01 106.79 32.38 2.09 210.00405.25 10.40 14.40 54.24 16.54 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 737 685 568 555$685.03 $527.99 $515.21786.5 7.58RCP $425.0026.81 117.00 36.62 2.21 210.00365.83 10.98 14.98 56.22 16.54 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 817 759 646 633$759.30 $600.55 $587.77847.0 8.17RCP $485.0029.77 127.56 41.12 2.34 210.00326.56 11.57 15.57 58.20 16.54 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 898 674 725 712$834.41 $673.94 $661.176' x 3' box 6.0 6.00RCP $310.0019.57 72.31 25.72 1.89 210.001401.50 9.40 13.40 50.84 6.25 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 619 575 453 440$575.20 $421.09 $408.326' x 7' box 6.0 6.00RCP $385.0019.57 72.31 25.72 1.89 210.001251.68 9.40 13.40 50.84 6.25 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 694 645 528 515$645.05 $490.93 $478.168' x 3' box 8.0 8.00RCP $390.0028.91 92.98 39.81 2.30 210.001131.86 11.40 15.40 57.63 6.25 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 751 698 579 565$697.52 $537.54 $524.778' x 8' box 8.0 8.00RCP $470.0028.91 92.98 39.81 2.30 210.001002.10 11.40 15.40 57.63 6.25 13.75 14.65 103 0.00 831 772 659 645$772.07 $612.09 $599.32Reference: 2016 RSMeans Heavy Construction Cost DataUpdated: 2/2016 JGHAssumptions:Costs:NTotal Import Trench Backfill? (Y/N)1.07 $ 6.09/CY Native Trench backfill - 31 23 16.13: 3020 $2.95 plus compaction 31 23 23.23: 6020 $1.43; convert from loose to compacted volume. ($2.95+$1.43)/LCY * 1.39 LCY/ECYNDewatering? (Y/N)1.74 $ 61.98/CY Imported Select Fill - sec 31 23 23.16 (0200, 0500) 31 23 23.20 (4022): Sand, dead or bank w/ hauling (20 CY, 6 mi) and compaction. ($35/LCY + $5.60/LCY)*1.39 LCY/ECY + $5.55/ECYyCatch Basins & Inlets? (Y/N)1.02 $ 6.15/CY Excavation - 31 23 16.13 1375: 10-14 ft deep, 1 CY excavator, Trench Box.One side of street C&G is regraded (30' street).1.00 $ 30.58/SY 4" Asphalt Pavement -32 11 23.23 (0390), 32 12 16.13 (0120, 0380), 31 23 23.20 (4022): 9" Bank run gravel base course ($7.55/SY), 2" Binder ($9.55/SY), 2" Wear ($10.70/SY [4"=$20.50/SY]) and Hauling ($5.55/LCY * 1.39LCY/ECY * 0.361CY/SY)10v:1h trench side slope (use trench boxes)1.02 $ 2.65/LF 4" Asphalt cutting - 02 41 19.25 (0015, 0020): Saw cutting asphalt up to 3" deep ($1.70/LF), each additional inch of depth ($0.95/LF) 3' average depth to top of pipe1.34 $ 3,125.00/EA 4' Manhole (for pipes =< 2.5' diameter) - 33 49 13.10 (1130, 1140): Precast 8' deep ($3,125/ea), each add'l foot of depth ($320/VLF)0.33' thick asphalt road covering1.10 $ 4,250.00/EA 5' Manhole (for pipes > 2.5' and <= 3.5') -33 49 13.10 (1170, 1180): Precast 8' deep ($4,250/ea), each add'l foot of depth ($550/VLF)0.75' thick untreated base course1.07 $ 5,675.00/EA 6' Manhole (for pipes > 3.5' and <= 4.5') - 33 49 13.10 (1210, 1220): Precast 8' deep ($5,675/ea), each add'l foot of depth ($755/VLF)500' Average distance between manholes1.03 $ 8,269/EA Manholes (for pipes > 4.5') ENR cost index adjustment from 2014 to January 20163+ Outside Diameter = Bottom trench width1.02 $ 1,375.00/EA Catch basins -33 44 13.13 1582: Curb inlet frame, grate, and curb box, Large 24" x 36" heavy duty $1,3751' bedding over pipe1.06 $ 14.65/LF Curb & Gutter - 32 16 13.13 (0440, 0441) 32 11 23.23 (0390) : Steel forms, 24" wide, straight ($12.40/LF) and radius ($13.95/LF). Plus 9" bank run gravel ($8/sy or $1.78/lf) Calculated based on percentage of C&G on radius.0.5' bedding under pipe1.03 $ 10.29/CY Hauling - 31 23 23.20 4622: 20 CY dump truck and conversion from loose to compacted volume. $7.4/LCY * 1.39 LCY/ECY1Inlets per 100 ft of pipe1.00 $ 210.00/day Trench Box (7' deep, 16' x 8',31 52 16.10 4500)30%of curb & gutter is on radius2.39 $ 66.83/CY Stabilization Gravel - sec 31 23 23.16 (0050, 0500) 31 23 23.20 (4022): Bank Run Gravel ($38.50/LCY * 1.39 LCY/ECY) plus compaction ($5.60/ECY) and hauling ($5.55/LCY * 1.39 LCY/ECY)1.03 $ 1,117.00/day Dewatering - 31 23 19.20 (1000, 1020): 4" diaphragm pump, 8 hrs attended ($990/day). Second pump ($127/day)1.71Construction Cost Index ratio since 1998. See ENR Construction Cost Index.xlsx at H:\Standards\Calculations\Cost Estimating5920ENR Construction Cost Index 199810133ENR Construction Cost Index January 201692.9%RSMeans City Cost Index for Grand Junction, CONOTES:(1) Assumes Class 3 RCP (33 41 13.60). 33", 54", 66", & 78" costs were estimated by linear interpolation between sizes. Costs for these sizes may be much higher because they are odd sizes.(2) 7' deep trench box (16' x 8') 31 52 16.10 4500(3) Backfill Material & Installation assumes in street. For out of street unit costs, the backfill material cost has been added in place of base course and asphalt.(4) Dewatering assumes 1' stabilization gravel at the bottom of the trench plus dewatering pumps(5) Conversion from loose to compacted volumes assumes 125 PCF for compacted density and 90 PCF for loose density. Or (125 PCF/ECY)/(90 PCF/LCY) = 1.39 LCY/ECY(6) Conversion from cubic yards to square yards for hauling of asphalt paving assumed a total thickness of 13". 3 ft x 3 ft x (13 in)/(12 in/ft) = 0.361 CY/SYAbbreviations:VLF vertical lineal footPCF pounds per cubic footLCY loose cubic yardECY embankment cubic yard2016 AVERAGE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM COST PER FOOTPage 178 of 235 Unit CostsD (inches)Adjusted Total Cost per FootAdjusted Cost Out of StreetAdjusted Cost Out of Street No InletsAdjusted Total Cost per FootAdjusted Cost Out of StreetAdjusted Cost Out of Street No Inlets15$137.94 $92.55 $79.78 $119.37 $73.97 $73.974 ft$3,125.00for 30" and smaller18$151.15 $104.90 $92.13 $132.58 $86.33 $86.335 ft$4,250.00for 36"-42"21$160.33 $113.22 $100.45 $141.75 $94.64 $94.646 ft$5,675.00for 48"-54"24$172.64 $124.68 $111.90 $154.06 $106.10 $106.10Cast in Place$8,269.00for larger than 54"27$202.62 $153.80 $141.03 $184.04 $135.23 $135.2330$216.91 $167.24 $154.46 $198.33 $148.66 $148.6633$239.62 $189.10 $176.32 $221.05 $170.52 $170.5236$296.46 $213.27 $200.50 $275.79 $192.61 $192.6142$337.21 $252.32 $239.54 $316.54 $231.65 $231.6548$380.71 $294.11 $281.34 $357.40 $270.80 $270.8054$496.65 $344.73 $331.96 $473.34 $321.42 $321.4260$554.65 $401.02 $388.25 $526.52 $372.89 $372.8966$619.45 $464.12 $451.35 $591.32 $435.99 $435.9972$685.03 $527.99 $515.21 $656.90 $499.86 $499.8678$759.30 $600.55 $587.77 $731.17 $572.42 $572.4284$834.41 $673.94 $661.17 $806.27 $645.81 $645.816' x 3' box$575.20 $421.09 $408.32 $556.63 $402.51 $402.516' x 7' box$645.05 $490.93 $478.16 $626.47 $472.35 $472.358' x 3' box$697.52 $537.54 $524.77 $678.94 $518.97 $518.978' x 8' box$772.07 $612.09 $599.32 $753.49 $593.51 $593.51City of MoabStorm Water Master PlanManholesCatch Basins No Catch BasinsNo manholes500 ft between manholesPage 179 of 235 City of Moab10692.17Jun-17Storm Water Master Plan10181.92Feb-16Project Cost Estimates20162017UnitPerTotalProject ProjectProjectLengthDiameterProjectIn or OutSizeNumber ofPipePipeManholeManholeConveyanceTotal TotalIDftinIDof StreetLabelManholesCost/ftCostCostCostCostConveyance Conveyance1246241In24''2$154.06$37,899$3,125.00$6,250.00$44,149$44,149 $47,0002843010Out30"1$148.66$42,219$3,125.00$3,125.00$45,3441973010In30"1$198.33$39,071$3,125.00$3,125.00$42,196763010In30"1$198.33$15,073$3,125.00$3,125.00$18,19812942411Out24"0$124.68$161,332$3,125.00$0.00$161,33210532411Out24"0$124.68$131,285$3,125.00$0.00$131,2854223011Out30"0$167.24$70,574$3,125.00$0.00$70,5741772412In24''1$154.06$27,269$3,125.00$3,125.00$30,394474812In48''2$357.40$16,798$5,675.00$11,350.00$28,1482904812In48''1$357.40$103,646$5,675.00$5,675.00$109,3215484812In48''1$357.40$195,855$5,675.00$5,675.00$201,5305224212In42''1$316.54$165,234$4,250.00$4,250.00$169,4842233612In36''1$275.79$61,501$4,250.00$4,250.00$65,751443012In30''1$198.33$8,727$3,125.00$3,125.00$11,8525492412In24"1$154.06$84,579$3,125.00$3,125.00$87,7042372412Out24"1$106.10$25,146$3,125.00$3,125.00$28,271135712413In24''4$154.06$87,968$3,125.00$12,500.00$100,468$100,468 $106,0005553614In36''2$275.79$153,063$4,250.00$8,500.00$161,5635454214Out42''1$231.65$126,249$4,250.00$4,250.00$130,4997095414Out54''1$321.42$227,888$5,675.00$5,675.00$233,5632216014Out48''x60''1$372.89$82,409$8,269.00$8,269.00$90,67810432414Out24''4$106.10$110,662$3,125.00$12,500.00$123,162552414Out24''2$106.10$5,835$3,125.00$6,250.00$12,0853113014In30''1$198.33$61,681$3,125.00$3,125.00$64,80610325414Out54''2$321.42$331,708$5,675.00$11,350.00$343,0583965414Out54''1$321.42$127,283$5,675.00$5,675.00$132,9582785414Out54''1$321.42$89,355$5,675.00$5,675.00$95,0305243014In30''3$198.33$103,925$3,125.00$9,375.00$113,30011706014Out48''x60''3$372.89$436,281$8,269.00$24,807.00$461,0882166014In48''x60''2$526.52$113,727$8,269.00$16,538.00$130,265ENR Construction Index10111214$112,000$382,000$770,000$3,265,000$105,738$363,191$732,454$3,108,594Page 1 of 4Page 180 of 235 20162017UnitPerTotalProject ProjectProjectLengthDiameterProjectIn or OutSizeNumber ofPipePipeManholeManholeConveyanceTotal TotalIDftinIDof StreetLabelManholesCost/ftCostCostCostCostConveyance Conveyance1204215In42''2$316.54$37,985$4,250.00$8,500.00$46,4854514815Out48"1$87.80$39,597$5,675.00$5,675.00$45,27216312416In24''1$154.06$4,776$3,125.00$3,125.00$7,901$7,901 $9,0002032417In24"2$154.06$31,274$3,125.00$6,250.00$37,5241912417Out24"1$106.10$20,265$3,125.00$3,125.00$23,3901932417Out24"1$106.10$20,477$3,125.00$3,125.00$23,6021082417In24"1$154.06$16,639$3,125.00$3,125.00$19,76433813018In30"8$198.33$670,553$3,125.00$25,000.00$695,553552418In24"2$154.06$8,473$3,125.00$6,250.00$14,72319352419In24''0$172.64$6,042$3,125.00$0.00$6,042$6,042 $7,0002383602Out60"99$201.26$77,081$0.00$0.00$77,081$77,081 $81,00020322420In24''0$172.64$5,524$3,125.00$0.00$5,524$5,524 $6,00021724221In42''0$337.21$24,279$4,250.00$0.00$24,279$24,279 $26,00022323622In36''0$296.46$9,487$4,250.00$0.00$9,487$9,487 $10,00023594823In48''0$380.71$22,462$5,675.00$0.00$22,462$22,462 $24,000241223624In36''0$296.46$36,168$4,250.00$0.00$36,168$36,168 $38,00025523625In36''0$296.46$15,416$4,250.00$0.00$15,416$15,416 $17,00026773626In36''0$296.46$22,827$4,250.00$0.00$22,827$22,827 $24,0003081027OutErosion Control0$0.00$0$3,125.00$0.00$10,000952027OutErosion Control0$0.00$0$3,125.00$0.00$10,0005433628AIn36''3$275.79$149,754$4,250.00$12,750.00$162,504702428AIn24''1$154.06$10,784$3,125.00$3,125.00$13,909932428AIn24"1$154.06$14,328$3,125.00$3,125.00$17,4535652428AIn24"1$154.06$87,044$3,125.00$3,125.00$90,1696352428AIn24"1$154.06$97,828$3,125.00$3,125.00$100,9533823028AIn30''1$198.33$75,762$3,125.00$3,125.00$78,8876032428AIn24"1$154.06$92,898$3,125.00$3,125.00$96,0235582428AIn24''1$154.06$85,966$3,125.00$3,125.00$89,0911123628AIn36''1$275.79$30,888$4,250.00$4,250.00$35,138612428AIn24''1$154.06$9,398$3,125.00$3,125.00$12,523572428AIn24"1$154.06$8,781$3,125.00$3,125.00$11,906612428AIn24"1$154.06$9,398$3,125.00$3,125.00$12,5231517182728A$110,000$746,000$22,000$758,000$91,757 $97,000$104,280$710,276$20,000$721,080Page 2 of 4Page 181 of 235 20162017UnitPerTotalProject ProjectProjectLengthDiameterProjectIn or OutSizeNumber ofPipePipeManholeManholeConveyanceTotal TotalIDftinIDof StreetLabelManholesCost/ftCostCostCostCostConveyance Conveyance5653628BIn36''1$275.79$155,821$4,250.00$4,250.00$160,0716353628BIn36''1$275.79$175,127$4,250.00$4,250.00$179,3771123028BIn30''x21$396.66$44,426$3,125.00$3,125.00$47,551702428BIn24''1$154.06$10,784$3,125.00$3,125.00$13,9094305428BIn54''2$473.34$203,535$5,675.00$11,350.00$214,8853823028BIn30''x21$396.66$151,524$3,125.00$3,125.00$154,649612428BIn24''1$154.06$9,398$3,125.00$3,125.00$12,523572428BIn24"1$154.06$8,781$3,125.00$3,125.00$11,9065583628BIn36''1$275.79$153,891$4,250.00$4,250.00$158,141612428BIn24"1$154.06$9,398$3,125.00$3,125.00$12,5236033628BIn36''1$275.79$166,301$4,250.00$4,250.00$170,551933628BIn36''1$275.79$25,648$4,250.00$4,250.00$29,8981135428BIn54''1$473.34$53,487$5,675.00$5,675.00$59,16228C9942428CIn24''3$154.06$153,136$3,125.00$9,375.00$162,511$162,511 $171,00029532429In24"2$154.06$8,165$3,125.00$6,250.00$14,415$14,415 $16,000392243Out24''3$106.10$41,591$3,125.00$9,375.00$50,96653243In24''1$154.06$8,165$3,125.00$3,125.00$11,290371243In24''0$172.64$64,048$3,125.00$0.00$64,048828303In30''0$216.91$179,599$3,125.00$0.00$179,599305993030In30"2$198.33$118,799$3,125.00$6,250.00$125,049$125,049 $132,000311551531Out15"0$0.00$0$3,125.00$0.00$8,000$8,000 $9,000326562432In24"3$154.06$101,064$3,125.00$9,375.00$110,439$110,439 $116,00033162033InC&G0$54.65$8,853$3,125.00$0.00$8,853$8,853 $10,0006572434In24"0$172.64$113,423$3,125.00$0.00$113,4238442434In24"0$172.64$145,706$3,125.00$0.00$145,706693035In30"2$198.33$13,685$3,125.00$6,250.00$19,935602435In24"2$154.06$9,244$3,125.00$6,250.00$15,494522435In24"2$154.06$8,011$3,125.00$6,250.00$14,26136446036OutErosion Control1$59.00$26,314$3,125.00$3,125.00$29,439$29,439 $31,00037408037OutLine Ditch1$0.00$0$3,125.00$3,125.00$3,125$3,125 $4,0003849038InCrosspan0$109.30$5,356$3,125.00$0.00$5,356$5,356 $6,00035244OutStructure1$106.10$3,713$3,125.00$3,125.00$6,838719244Out24"3$106.10$76,286$3,125.00$9,375.00$85,661$259,129$49,690$185,009$1,225,147$305,904 $322,000$1,287,00028B3$273,000$53,000$195,00034354Page 3 of 4Page 182 of 235 20162017UnitPerTotalProject ProjectProjectLengthDiameterProjectIn or OutSizeNumber ofPipePipeManholeManholeConveyanceTotal TotalIDftinIDof StreetLabelManholesCost/ftCostCostCostCostConveyance Conveyance146244Out24"2$106.10$15,491$3,125.00$6,250.00$21,7415299245Out24"2$106.10$31,724$3,125.00$6,250.00$37,974$37,974 $40,000638366Out36''4$192.61$122,884$4,250.00$17,000.00$139,884115366In36''1$275.79$31,716$4,250.00$4,250.00$35,966770247In24''0$172.64$12,085$3,125.00$0.00$12,085$12,085 $13,0008218248Out24''3$106.10$23,130$3,125.00$9,375.00$32,505$32,505 $35,00091370369In36"10$275.79$377,832$4,250.00$42,500.00$420,332$420,332 $442,000391423639Out36"3$192.61$27,350$4,250.00$12,750.00$40,100$40,100 $43,000402942440Out24"2$106.10$31,193$3,125.00$6,250.00$37,443$37,443 $40,0006$185,000$175,850Page 4 of 4Page 183 of 235 AGENDA SUMMARY  MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING  December 12, 2017        Agenda Item  #: 8‐3      Title:  Approval of Ordinance 2017‐39 amending the City of Moab Municipal Code, Title 10  Vehicles and Traffic, Chapter 10.04 Vehicle Code; specifically, the recently amended section  10.04.230, to further clarify restrictions for vehicles parked while idling or running.  Staff Presenter:  Amy Weiser, Special Projects Manager  Department:  Administration        Summary:       Shortly upon adoption of Ordinance 2017‐35 staff decided that the language in section  10.04.230(B) needed further clarification. As it was approved, it was somewhat confusing as  to whether or not the ordinance actually prohibited a vehicle from simply being parked on  any public road. This amendment makes clear that it applies only to vehicles parked while  idling or running, not just parked.          Staff Recommendation:  Approve Ordinance 2017‐39 restricting the parking of running or  vehicles within City limits.        Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Ordinance 2017‐39 amending Section 10.04.230  to further clarify the restriction on vehicles parked while idling or running within City limits.”      Attachment(s):   Proposed Ordinance 2017‐39     Previously approved Ordinance 2017‐35 Page 184 of 235 ORDINANCE #2017-39 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 10 VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, CHAPTER 10.04 VEHICLE CODE; SPECIFICALLY, THE RECENTLY AMENDED SECTION 10.04.230, TO FURTHER CLARIFY RESTRICTIONS FOR VEHICLES PARKED WHILE IDLING OR RUNNING. WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) adopted the Moab Municipal Code (“Code”) and especially Chapter 10.04, also known as “Vehicles and Traffic” in an effort to promote safe use of all City streets and vehicles within the City limits; and. WHEREAS, from time to time the City has noticed that there is a need to amend the Code in order to clarify existing uses or prohibit activities that may be deemed unsafe or which may disturb the peace of residents; and, WHEREAS, the City has received several noise complaints from residents due to commercial trucks and recreational vehicles parking for hours on public streets while running or idling; and, WHEREAS, Council reviewed Ordinance #2017-35 in a regularly scheduled public meeting held on October 17, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of the proposed change to Chapter 10.04, Vehicles and Parking, of the Moab Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, Council found that the amendments to the code are in the best interests of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the Moab City Council hereby adopts Ordinance #2017-35 and amends Chapter 10.04, specifically Section 10.04.230 as follows: 10.04.230 Unlawful Parking, Idling or Camping A. Definitions. As used in this section: 1. “Block” means the distance on both sides of a street between two (2) intersecting streets 2. "Commercial vehicle" means a motor vehicle in excess of one-ton capacity of whatever make or type designed for or adapted to commercial or agricultural purposes, regardless of the use to which such vehicle is put at any particular time. The term “commercial vehicle” includes, without limitation, all so-called “semi” truck tractors and “semi” truck-trailers, as well as motorized equipment, such as loaders, backhoes, excavators, or the like. 3. “Idling” means running an engine on a motor vehicle while parked. 4. “Public Street” means any right of way owned by the City of Moab, Grand County or Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) within the city limits of Moab. This includes roads, streets and alleys. 5. “Recreational vehicle (RV)” means a vehicle other than a mobile home, primarily designed as a temporary dwelling for travel, recreational or vacation use, which is either a self-propelled motor Page 185 of 235 vehicle or pulled by another vehicle. The term recreational vehicle also includes a boat, a snowmobile, personal watercraft, an all-terrain vehicle, or off-highway vehicle, a travel trailer, a camping trailer, a motor home, a fifth wheel trailer, trailers, and other similar vehicles. 6. “Running” means any vehicle, as defined in this section, parked with a generator or refrigeration unit in operation. 7. “Trailer” means any truck trailer or other trailer designed or adapted primarily for the transportation of materials, debris, or property of whatever kind, including, without limitation, boats, personal watercraft, snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, or motorcycles, whether occupied or empty. 8. “Travel trailer,” “camping trailer,” or “fifth wheel trailer” means a portable vehicle without motive power, whether occupied or empty, designed as a temporary dwelling for travel, recreational or vacation use that does not require a special highway movement permit when drawn by a self-propelled motor vehicle. B. Idling or Running Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to park or to cause to park or leave standing, while idling, or running, any motor vehicle commercial vehicle, or recreational vehicle as defined in this section on any public road, street, alley or municipal property for a period of time in excess of four consecutive hours. Any vehicle parked or left standing in violation of this subsection may be impounded or removed by any certified peace officer or other designated official, and the owner may be fined as provided in this chapter. C. Idling or Running Overnight Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to park or cause to park or leave standing, while idling or running any motor vehicle, commercial vehicle or recreational vehicle on any public road, street, alley, or municipal property for any length of time between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Any vehicle so parked or left standing in violation of this subsection may be impounded or removed by any certified peace officer or other designated official, and the owner may be fined as provided in this chapter. D. Camping Prohibited. It is unlawful to park any motor vehicle, commercial vehicle, or recreational vehicle on a public road, street, alley, or private property, for purposes of human habitation or overnight camping. Any vehicle parked or left standing in violation of this subsection for a period exceeding four consecutive hours may be impounded or removed by any on duty peace officer, or other designated official, and the owner may be fined as provided in this chapter. 1. Vehicles moved from a parking spot and then re-parked on the same block, as defined in this section, within twenty four (24) hours from the time of removal shall be deemed to have been continuously parked for the purposes of this subsection. E. Impoundment. For purposes of impoundment and removal, a certified peace officer, or other designated official, may, after placing a visible notification on the vehicle and making a reasonable effort to locate the owner, impound and remove any motor vehicle which has been unmoved for four consecutive hours. The cost of impoundment and removal shall be charged to the owner or any person who claims the impounded motor vehicle. Page 186 of 235 F. Ownership. The presence of any motor vehicle, commercial vehicle, or recreational vehicle when standing or parked in violation of this section is prima facie evidence that the registered owner or lessee of such vehicle parked the same, or that the driver was acting as the agent of the owner or lessee. G. Relocation. No motor vehicle, commercial vehicle, or recreational vehicle that has been the subject of a violation of this section shall be subsequently relocated or parked on the same block where the violation occurred for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of violation. Relocation or parking of the vehicle in violation of this subsection shall be a separate violation. H. Continuing violations. In the case of a continuing violation under this section, each day of violation shall be deemed a separate offense. I. Exception. The prohibitions in this section shall not apply to vehicles under continuous human operation in connection with construction activities, or vehicles left temporarily idling or running in connection with deliveries. HJ. Conflicting Ordinances. This section shall control and take precedence over any conflicting provisions in this code concerning parking or storage of vehicles. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on, ____________________ 2017 SIGNED: ______________________________ David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Rachel Stenta, Recorder Page 187 of 235 ORDINANCE #2017-35 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 10 VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, CHAPTER 10.04 VEHICLE CODE; SPECIFICALLY AMEDNING SECTION 10.04.230 TO DEFINE IDLING VEHICLES AND PARKING RESTRICTIONS. WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) adopted the Moab Municipal Code (“Code”) and especially Chapter 10.04, also known as “Vehicles and Traffic” in an effort to promote safe use of all City streets and vehicles within the City limits; and. WHEREAS, from time to time the City has noticed that there is a need to amend the Code in order to clarify existing uses or prohibit activities that may be deemed unsafe or which may disturb the peace of residents; and, WHEREAS, the City has received several noise complaints from residents due to commercial trucks and recreational vehicles parking for hours on public streets while running or idling; and, WHEREAS, Council reviewed Ordinance #2017-35 in a regularly scheduled public meeting held on October 17, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of the proposed change to Chapter 10.04, Vehicles and Parking, of the Moab Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, Council found that the amendments to the code are in the best interests of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the Moab City Council hereby adopts Ordinance #2017-35 and amends Chapter 10.04, specifically Section 10.04.230 as follows: 10.04.230 Unlawful Parking, Idling or Camping A. Definitions. As used in this section: 1. “Block” means the distance on both sides of a street between two (2) intersecting streets 2. "Commercial vehicle" means a motor vehicle in excess of one-ton capacity of whatever make or type designed for or adapted to commercial or agricultural purposes, regardless of the use to which such vehicle is put at any particular time. The term “commercial vehicle” includes, without limitation, all so-called “semi” truck tractors and “semi” truck-trailers, as well as motorized equipment, such as loaders, backhoes, excavators, or the like. 3. “Idling” means running an engine on a motor vehicle while parked. 4. “Public Street” means any right of way owned by the City of Moab, Grand County or Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) within the city limits of Moab. This includes roads, streets and alleys. 5. “Recreational vehicle (RV)” means a vehicle other than a mobile home, primarily designed as a temporary dwelling for travel, recreational or vacation use, which is either a self-propelled motor vehicle or pulled by another vehicle. The term recreational vehicle also includes a boat, a snowmobile, Page 188 of 235 personal watercraft, an all-terrain vehicle, or off-highway vehicle, a travel trailer, a camping trailer, a motor home, a fifth wheel trailer, trailers, and other similar vehicles. 6. “Running” means any vehicle, as defined in this section, parked with a generator or refrigeration unit in operation. 7. “Trailer” means any truck trailer or other trailer designed or adapted primarily for the transportation of materials, debris, or property of whatever kind, including, without limitation, boats, personal watercraft, snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, or motorcycles, whether occupied or empty. 8. “Travel trailer,” “camping trailer,” or “fifth wheel trailer” means a portable vehicle without motive power, whether occupied or empty, designed as a temporary dwelling for travel, recreational or vacation use that does not require a special highway movement permit when drawn by a self-propelled motor vehicle. B. Idling or Running Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to park or to cause to park or leave standing, idling, or running any motor vehicle commercial vehicle, or recreational vehicle as defined in this section on any public road, street, alley or municipal property for a period of time in excess of four consecutive hours. Any vehicle parked or left standing in violation of this subsection may be impounded or removed by any certified peace officer or other designated official, and the owner may be fined as provided in this chapter. C. Idling or Running Overnight Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to park or cause to park or leave standing, idling or running any motor vehicle, commercial vehicle or recreational vehicle on any public road, street, alley, or municipal property for any length of time between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Any vehicle so parked or left standing in violation of this subsection may be impounded or removed by any certified peace officer or other designated official, and the owner may be fined as provided in this chapter. D. Camping Prohibited. It is unlawful to park any motor vehicle, commercial vehicle, or recreational vehicle on a public road, street, alley, or private property, for purposes of human habitation or overnight camping. Any vehicle parked or left standing in violation of this subsection for a period exceeding four consecutive hours may be impounded or removed by a peace officer or other designated official, and the owner may be fined as provided in this chapter. 1. Vehicles moved from a parking spot and then re-parked on the same block, as defined in this section, within twenty four (24) hours from the time of removal shall be deemed to have been continuously parked for the purposes of this subsection. E. Impoundment. For purposes of impoundment and removal, a certified peace officer, or other designated official, may, after placing a visible notification on the vehicle and making a reasonable effort to locate the owner, impound and remove any motor vehicle which has been unmoved for four consecutive hours. The cost of impoundment and removal shall be charged to the owner or any person who claims the impounded motor vehicle. Page 189 of 235 F. Ownership. The presence of any motor vehicle, commercial vehicle, or recreational vehicle when standing or parked in violation of this section is prima facie evidence that the registered owner or lessee of such vehicle parked the same, or that the driver was acting as the agent of the owner or lessee. G. Relocation. No motor vehicle, commercial vehicle, or recreational vehicle that has been the subject of a violation of this section shall be subsequently relocated or parked on the same block where the violation occurred for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of violation. H. Continuing violations. In the case of a continuing violation under this section, each day of violation shall be deemed a separate offense. I. Exception. The prohibitions in this section shall not apply to vehicles under continuous human operation in connection with construction activities, or vehicles left temporarily idling or running in connection with deliveries. H. Conflicting Ordinances. This section shall control and take precedence over any conflicting provisions in this code concerning parking or storage of vehicles. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on, ____________________ 2017 SIGNED: ______________________________ David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Rachel Stenta, Recorder Page 190 of 235  City of Moab    Regular Council Meeting Schedule   2018    The City of Moab will hold Regular City Council Meetings at 7:00 PM with workshops  beginning at 6:30 PM on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month.  All Regular  City Council Meetings will be held in the Moab City Council Chambers at 217 East Center  Street, Moab, Utah.  Meeting dates will be as follows:    Regular Meeting/Joint  Planning Commission  January 9  Regular Meeting January 23  Joint Meeting with Grand  County Council (Possible)  January 30    Regular Meeting February 13 Regular Meeting February 27  Regular Meeting March 13 Regular Meeting March 27  Regular Meeting/Joint  Planning Commission  April 10 Regular Meeting April 24  Regular Meeting May 8 Regular Meeting May 22  Joint Meeting with Grand  County Council (Possible)  May 29     Regular Meeting June 12 Regular Meeting June 26  Regular Meeting/Joint  Planning Commission  July 10 Regular Meeting  (falls on Pioneer  Day)  July 25    Joint Meeting with Grand  County Council (Possible)  July 31     Regular Meeting August 14 Regular Meeting August 28  Regular Meeting September 11 Regular Meeting September 25  Regular Meeting/Joint  Planning Commission  October 9 Regular Meeting October 23  Joint Meeting with Grand  County Council (Possible)  October 30    Regular Meeting November 13 Regular Meeting December 11    /s/ Rachel E. Stenta      City Recorder/Assistant City Manager      Published in the Times Independent, December 21 and 28, 2017.    Page 191 of 235 City of Moab  Holiday Schedule  2018    All City Offices will be closed on the following holidays during 2018:       Monday, January 1  New Year’s Day   Monday, January 15    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day    Monday, February 19   Presidents’ Day     Monday, May 28     Memorial Day    Wednesday, July 4  Independence Day        Tuesday, July 24    Pioneer Day         Monday, September 3  Labor Day     Monday, October 8  Columbus Day       Monday, November 12  Veterans’ Day (Observed)        Thursday, November 22    Thanksgiving Day       Friday, November 23  Day After Thanksgiving       Tuesday, December 25  Christmas Day       /s/ Rachel E. Stenta      City Recorder/Assistant City Manager      Published in the Times Independent, December 21 and 28, 2017.    Page 192 of 235 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 12, 2017 Agenda Item #: 8-7 Title: Adoption of Updated Recreation Interlocal Agreement Fiscal Impact: $90,000 Staff Presenter(s): Tif Miller, Director of Parks, Recreation and Trails Department: Recreation Applicant: n/a Background/Summary: The interlocal agreement between the City of Moab, The Grand County School District, and the Grand County Recreation Special Service District has not been updated in many years and the oversight committee responsible for that agreement had not met for a number of years as well. The committee met over the last few months, and determined that some changes would be made. In the past, the Recreation Board and School District paid based off a percentage of the recreation budget. The budget will now be based off a set contribution of $75,000 for the Recreation Board and $15,000 for the School District. This amount will assist with budgeting for all parties involved, will help to maintain a fair contribution that won’t be affected by significant increases to the recreation budget, and will be revisited every two years to make sure that the contribution is still in line with all parties. Along with the contribution, each entity provides recreation facility use as available to the others. The School District will be taking back Middle School Football and Middle School Volleyball which is why their contribution has gone down compared to the past. Options: Approve or deny. Staff Recommendation: Approve Adoption of Updated Recreation Interlocal Agreement Recommended Motion: “I move to approve the adoption of the Updated Recreation Interlocal Agreement” Attachment(s): Wibit design, system quote, sole source product confirmation Page 193 of 235 Resolution # 62-2017 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AS TO THE PROVISION OF COUNTY-WIDE RECREATION SERVICES, BY AND AMONG THE CITY OF MOAB, THE GRAND COUNTY SPECIAL SERVICES RECREATION DISTRICT AND THE GRAND COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Interlocal Agreement as to the Provision of County-wide Recreation Services, by and among the City of Moab, the Grand County Special Services Recreation District and the Grand County School District has been presented to this meeting of the Moab City Council, and is attached to this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Governing Body of the City of Moab do hereby approve the attached agreement in substantially the form presented to this meeting of the Moab City Council, and authorize the appropriate officials to sign and execute said agreement. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of the City of Moab in open session this 12th day of November, 2017. CITY OF MOAB By: David L. Sakrison Mayor Attest: Rachel Stenta City Recorder Page 194 of 235 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AS TO THE PROVISION OF COUNTY-WIDE RECREATION SERVICES, BY AND AMONG THE CITY OF MOAB, THE GRAND COUNTY SPECIAL SERVICES RECREATION DISTRICT AND THE GRAND COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Pursuant to the lnterlocal Cooperation Act (Sections 11-13-1 et. seq., Utah Code Annotated) and for the mutual benefit of the citizens, inhabitants and constituents of the City of Moab ("City") the Grand County School District, ("School District") and the Grand County Recreation Special Service District ("GCRSSD"), the City, the School District and the GCRSSD hereby agree as follows: 1.Purpose. The purpose of this agreement is to provide to some extent for coordinated recreation services, facilities, funding and programs for residents of Grand County. 2.Mission and Philosophy. The parties hereby agree to espouse and promote the mission, philosophy and goals of the Moab City Recreation Department in carrying out the responsibilities of Moab City Recreation programs administered by this agreement. The mission, philosophy and goals of the Moab City Recreation Department are as follows: Moab City Recreation Mission Statement The mission of Moab City Recreation is to improve the quality of life for all Grand County residents by providing a wide variety of recreation and leisure activities, programs , facilities, services and special events that encourage positive community involvement. Moab City Recreation strives to encourage fair play, honesty, teamwork and sportsmanship in every endeavor, and to create community pride and unity through its contributions. Moab City Recreation Philosophy and Goals A.Promote enjoyment of recreation and leisure time by organizing and offering organized athletic and arts and leisure programs, activities, and events for the members of our community. B.Provide out-of-school recreation opportunities for the children in our community. 1.Involve all children who wish to participate, regardless of knowledge of the activity or sport, skill level or financial status. 2.Value each child as a member of the group and emphasize the importance of cooperation, teamwork, personal improvement and growth, and good sportsmanship. 3.Improve indi.vidual sldlls and ability through practice and competition. C.Provide organized athletic activities, programs, and other recreati.onal opportunities and special events for adults in our community. 3.Provision of Services- Immediately upon this agreement's becoming effective as provided for herein, specific recreation programs shall be provided for residents of Grand County by the Moab City Recreation Department. Recreation Services 1 Page 195 of 235 ' L provided shall include, but not be limited to: baseball and baseball tournaments, softball and softball tournaments, football, basketball, soccer, volleyball, arts and leisure activities, swimming programs, special events, races, summer camps, misc. adult sports programs, and other community programs that fulfill the mission of the Moab City Recreation Department. The City will provide and maintain all materials necessary for the provision of services outlined herein. The Moab City Recreation Department shall be under the legislative direction of the Moab City Council and the administrative direction of the Moab City Manager. The City Manager will direct the activities of the Parks, Recreation and Trails Director, who will direct the activities of Recreation Department employees and volunteers. Unless specified otherwise in writing, the Moab City Recreation Department will be located at the Moab City Offices, 217 E Center Street. 4.Provision and Maintenance of Facilities- The City shall provide the Center Street Ballpark, the Center Street Gym, Moab City parks, the Moab Arts and Recreation Center, the Moab Recreation and Aquatic Center and other Moab City facilities as necessary to provide services and programs as outlined herein, provided that the other entities hereto shall have priority over non-City Recreation uses for use of said facilities, provided that said use promotes the purposes of this agreement. The School District shall provide the High School, Middle School, and HMK Gyms and school district playing fields as necessary to provide recreation services and programs outlined herein. The School District shall also provide other School District facilities as feasible, provided that the Recreation Department shall have second priority under School District programs for use of said facilities. The GCRSSD shall facilitate provision of the Spanish Trail Arena, the OSTA ballfields, and other facilities/spaces as necessary to provide recreation services and programs outlined herein, provided that the Recreation Department shall have second priority under Spanish Trail Arena events and programs for use of the facility. All facilities provided pursuant to this agreement shall be provided free. of charge to the other entities hereto, except that owners of facilities may be compensated for extraordinary costs or damages to the facility. Each party is responsible for the maintenance of property and facilities provided pursuant to this agreement. 5.Indemnification- The GCRSSD, the City, and School District shall not indemnify one another for negligence in performing maintenance duties as outlined herein. 6.Financial Responsibilities- Each party shall contribute the following fixed amount of the intergovernmental contributions and/or subsidies for the budget of the Moab City Recreation Fund. The fixed amount is to be reviewed every two (2) years: City of Moab GCRSSD School District $75,000 $15,000 Responsible for remaining contribution All contributions will be paid to the City of Moab within 30 days of invoice from the City. 7.Administration of Moab City Recreation Budget and Capital Improvements Plan- The City will administer the budget for the Moab City Recreation Department, including the Recreation Department, the Moab Arts and Recreation Center, and the Moab Recreation and Aquatic Center. The Superintendent will administer Capital Projects for the School District. The City Manager will administer Capital Projects for the City. The RSSD Chairperson will administer Capital Projects for GCRSSD. 2 Page 196 of 235 Annual Recreation Oversight Committee activities with timeline: By February 15th of each year: The Oversight Committee shall meet for the following purposes: (a)Discuss the upcoming City of Moab Recreation budget. (b)Discuss possible capital improvement for the City of Moab Recreation Department, as well discuss possible projects that could be initiated in the future with the School District and GCRSSD By April 15th of each year: The City of Moab will forward the initial balanced City of Moab Recreation Budget to the Oversight Committee for the first review. This will be via email, and will include an update on information regarding any Capital Improvements that are being considered. Parties to the agreement shall submit, via email, their comments, responses, or suggestions to Moab City Manager and Parks, Recreation and Trails Director regarding the proposed Moab City Recreation Budget and/or the Capital Improvements Plan. By May 1st of each year: The amended City of Moab Recreation budget will be sent out to all parties for final review Committee members will submit to their parties the amended proposal(s) for approval. Any comments, responses or suggestion must be submitted before May 1st. By May 15th of each year:Moab City, the GCRSSD and the School District shall meet (if necessary) to approve the Moab City Recreation Budget and appropriate funds for said Budget in their regular budget processes. 8.Administration of Agreement. An Oversight Committee comprised of the City Manager, the School District Superintendent and the Chair of the Recreation District Board shall administer this agreement. The Parks, Recreation and Trails Director, the Grand County Administrator, and the Spanish Trail Arena Manager shall act in an advisory capacity to the Oversight Committee. The Oversight Committee will review this agreement on a recurring three year basis and coordinate budgetary and other matters regarding this agreement among the governing bodies of the City, the Recreation District and the School District. 9.Control of Property. Pursuant to Section 11-13-7, Utah Code Annotated, each party to this agreement shall exercise control over its respective property that is provided in fulfilling its obligations under this agreement. 10.Effectiveness and Duration of Agreement. This agreement shall become effective immediately upon its approval by resolutions of the parties' governing bodies and by execution of the agreement by appropriate officials. This agreement shall remain in effect until 60 days after a notice of by the termination is given by any party hereto to the other parties hereto. 3 Page 197 of 235 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 #: 9-1 Title: Consideration to Adopt Resolution #63‐2017, Approving the First Amendment to Development Improvements Agreement for the Slot Canyon Renovation Project Located in the C‐2, Commercial‐Residential Zone at 245 Williams Way Date Submitted: December 4, 2017 Applicant: Lorin Mortensen and Mark Holt Staff Presenter: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Attachment(s): Signed First Amendment to Development Improvements Agreement Options: Approve as submitted, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Resolution #63‐2017 to approve the First Amendment to Development Improvements Agreement with Cascade Creek, LLC for the Slot Canyon Renovation Project located in the C‐2, Commercial‐Residential Zone at 245 Williams Way and authorize the mayor to sign the amended agreement. Background/Summary: The original Development Improvements Agreement was approved by City Council on February 14, 2017 and authorized a cost‐share for sewer improvements that provided a benefit to City infrastructure. The City agreed to contribute a sum of $7,000 towards those improvements. The contractor completed the sewer improvements during the City’s chip seal project however, an area in front of the building was not chip sealed because of the location of the contractor’s equipment. The First Amendment to Development Improvements Agreement authorizes the disbursement of $6,250 withholding $750 to cover the cost of the chip seal material to be installed in spring of 2018. Page 198 of 235 CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION #63-2017 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT FOR THE SLOT CANYON RENOVATION PROJECT AT 245 WILLIAMS WAY WHEREAS, Mark Holt and Lorin Mortensen acting on behalf of Cascade Creek, LLC, with offices at 251 South 839 East, Smithfield, Utah 84335, as the “Owner” of record of 245 Williams Way, Moab, Utah, a .10 acre (4,400 square feet) parcel of land located in the C-2 (Commercial Residential Zone), applied for the approval of a commercial site plan on said property; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2016, Owner provided the City of Moab with the necessary documents, plans and drawings to complete the application for review of the commercial site plan as required in Code Chapter 17.09.660; and WHEREAS, the City of Moab Engineering and Public Works Departments determined that required public improvements needed to be constructed for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Development Improvements Agreement for the Slot Canyon Renovation Project on February 14, 2017 based on Owner-furnished cost estimates for required improvements and initiated construction of sanitary sewer improvements as required; and WHEREAS, the City agreed to pay the Developer the sum of $7,000.00 for additional work necessary to improve the sanitary sewer line in Williams Way; and WHEREAS, a small portion of the street chip seal project was not completed because of congestion at the job site; and WHEREAS, the City of Moab and Cascade Creek, LLC, agreed that it is appropriate to disburse the amount owed for the work less $750.00 that will be used to cover the costs of the chip seal to be completed in the spring of 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Moab City Council, with the adoption of Resolution #63-2017, hereby approves the submitted First Amendment to the Improvements Agreement (attached) for the Slot Canyon Renovation Project at 245 Williams Way and the Council authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreement. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on December 12, 2017. SIGNED: ______________________________ David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Rachel Stenta, Recorder          Page 199 of 235 FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT For Slot Canyon Renovation Project For valuable consideration, the CITY OF MOAB, a Utah municipality (City), and Cascade Creek, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (Developer) mutually referred to as the “Parties”, enter into the following First Amendment to the Development Improvements Agreement (the Agreement), pursuant to Moab Municipal Code Section 17.09.660 et seq., to govern the development of the subject property and the installation of required improvements. I. RECITALS. A. Pursuant to the Agreement the City has agreed to pay the Developer a total of $7,000.00 to cover certain additional improvements to the City sanitary sewer system. The Developer has substantially completed those sanitary sewer improvements, with the exception of a small area that requires installation of chip seal material. Because of the unavailability of asphalt, completion of that work must be delayed until the spring of 2018. B. The parties have conferred and agreed that it is appropriate to disburse the balance owing for the work to the Developer, less the sum of $750.00 to cover the cost of the chip seal material to be installed in the spring of 2018. II. AGREEMENT IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE, THE AGREEMENT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. This City is authorized to immediately release the sum of $6,250.00 to the Developer in payment for sanitary sewer improvements specified in Section Four of the Agreement. The City shall retain $750.00 to cover the cost of the chip seal improvements (Retained Funds). 2. The chip seal work shall be completed no later than July 1, 2018. Upon confirmation by City staff that the remaining chip seal work is complete, the City shall release the balance of the Retained Funds. 3. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Page 200 of 235 THIS AGREEMENT has been executed by the City of Moab, acting by and through the Moab City Council, which has duly authorized execution, and by Developer, who has duly authorized execution, as of the date(s) specified below. CITY OF MOAB: By: ___________________ Mayor David L. Sakrison Date ATTEST: By: ___________________ Rachel Stenta Date City Recorder DEVELOPER: CASCADE CREEK, LLC By: ___________________ Mark Holt, Manger Date Page 201 of 235 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 #:9-2 Pl-17-157 Title: Adoption of Council Resolution #61-2017 to Approve the Plat of the Buen Camino Boundary Line Adjustment Located at 459 and 469 Bowen Circle in the R-2, Single- and Two- Family Residential Zone and Approve the Improvements Agreement Date Submitted: December 12, 2017 Staff Presenter: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Applicant: Chad Harris Attachment(s): Council Resolution #61-2017, Improvements Agreement, and Proposed Plat Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Resolution #61-2017, to approve the plat for the Buen Camino Boundary Line Adjustment and Improvements Agreement. Background/Summary: The City received an application for this simple boundary line adjustment from Chad Harris on February 16, 2015. On January 10, 2017, the City Council originally approved the boundary line adjustment without conditions. However, because there are some public improvements such as street surface, curb, gutter and sidewalk, that are usually required as a function of the building permit, an Improvements Agreement will be necessary. Nothing has changed from the originally approved lot line adjustment, however, because of delays in scheduling and review of the Improvements Agreement, the plat has expired. Moab Municipal Code Section 16.08.010, E requires that a final plat be recorded within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of approval. The plat was approved on January 10, 2017, and is now being reviewed for a second time to refresh the application and adopt the Improvements Agreement. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution #-2017 that will conditionally approve the plat and the Improvements Agreement. Page 202 of 235 RESOLUTION #61-2017 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE ROUFA SUBDIVISION AND THE IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AS SUBMITTED BY CHAD HARRIS WHEREAS, Mr. Chad Harris, PO Box 301 Moab, Utah 84532, as “Owner” of Lots 1 and 2, Roufa Subdivision, (459 and 469 Bowen Circle), in the R-2 Zone, has applied for a lot line adjustment between the two lots; and WHEREAS, the Owner submitted to the City of Moab the appropriate application and documents for review and approval of the proposed lot line adjustment; and WHEREAS, Lot 1 will be comprised of 17,538 square feet (.40 acre) and Lot 2, a flag lot, will consist of 8,257 square feet (.19 acre) with a “pole length of 57.79 linear feet; and WHEREAS, the proposed lot dimensions satisfy the minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet for the R-2 Zone; and WHEREAS, Lot 2 satisfies the definition of “flag-shaped or panhandle lots” in Moab Municipal Code Chapter 17.06.020, as follows: “Flag-shaped or panhandle-shaped lots” may be created in any single-family or two-family residential zone if all of the following requirements are met: 1.The lot has at least twenty feet of frontage on a dedicated public street, which frontage serves as access only to the subject lot or parcel; 2.The handle portion of the lot is at least twenty feet in width, and not more than one hundred fifty feet in length; 3.That the body of the lot meets the lot area and lot width requirements of the applicable zones. WHEREAS, the proposal has been reviewed for compliance with the Moab Municipal Code and State Code Chapter 10-9a-608 (2) that allows an amendment of a subdivision plat without a public hearing if: (a) the petition seeks to: “Adjust the lot lines of adjoining lots or parcels if the fee owners of each of the adjoining lots or parcels join in the petition, regardless of whether the lots or parcels are located in the same subdivision…” WHEREAS, the developer will be required to construct curb, gutter, sidewalk and a portion of the street surface, an Improvements Agreement is necessary; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the consideration of a Staff recommendation and having reviewed the technical aspects of the pertinent code sections, the City Council finds, that the code requirements for the Boundary Line Adjustment have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Moab City Council, the adoption of Resolution #61-2017, hereby approves the submitted Improvements Agreement (attached) for Buen Camino and the Council authorizes the Mayor to sign the Agreement. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on December 12, 2017. SIGNED: ______________________________ Resolution #61-2017 Page 203 of 235 David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Rachel Stenta, Recorder Page 204 of 235 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT For Buen Camino Subdivision For valuable consideration, the CITY OF MOAB, a Utah municipality (City), and Chad D. Harris and Margaret Harris (Subdivider) referred to as the Parties, enter into the following Subdivision Improvements and Development Agreement (the Agreement), pursuant to Moab Municipal Code (MMC) Sections 16.20.010, to govern the development of the subject property and the installation of subdivision improvements required by City Code. I. RECITALS. a. On January 10, 2017 The City Council approved Resolution No. 02-2017, a resubdivision creating two lots within a lot of the Roufa Subdivision, and it is necessary to enter into this Agreement to confirm the requirements for necessary subdivision improvements. II. AGREEMENT THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Covered Property. The recitals above are incorporated into this Agreement. The real property in the County of Grand, State of Utah, subject to this Agreement (the Property) is described in Exhibit 1, attached. 2. Payment of Fees; Approved Land Uses. Subdivider agrees to pay all in-effect City fees applicable to the Subdivision, including but not limited to, impact fees, connection fees, building permit fees, and applicable inspection fees. Applicable fees shall calculated and paid at the time of connection or the time when the service is performed. a). The uses permitted in the Subdivision shall correspond with the uses authorized for the R-2 Zone in Moab Municipal Code Section 17.45. Subject to the conditions in this Agreement, the Property has been authorized for the following uses/activities: Lot 1, 17,538 Square feet; and Lot 2, 8,257 square feet. The configuration of the Subdivision and the uses therein shall conform to the Plat and Construction Plans as set forth in Exhibit 2 to this Agreement. Page 205 of 235 3. Required Improvements. Subdivider shall construct all of the improvements on and adjacent to the Property shown on the Plat and Construction Plans as shown in Exhibit 2 (the Required Improvements). Required Improvements shall include the public improvements shown on the Construction Plans, as well as the following: a). Site clearing and removal of obstructions; b). General site grading of the Property; c). Site utilities, including culinary water lines, fire hydrants, and sanitary sewer lines; d). Streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; e). Street striping, signage, and street lights; f). Storm water drainage facilities; g). Non-motorized pathways (if applicable) h). All landscaping, irrigations systems, fencing, or other visual screening required as a condition of approval; i). all electric utility lines, cable television/data, and telephone lines; and j). all incidental improvements necessary or specified for use and occupation of the Subdivision. 4. Improvements to be Completed in Conformance with Construction Plans. All Required Improvements shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner and in conformity with the approved Construction Plans. No deviations from the Construction Plans shall be permitted, except as authorized in writing by the City Engineer upon a showing of good cause. In addition, all Required Improvements shall be completed in conformance with the City of Moab Public Improvement Specifications, building codes, and all state and federal regulations, as applicable. 5. Timeline for Completion. Construction of the Required Improvements shall not commence until the Effective Date of this Agreement. Construction of all Required Improvements shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. a). A reasonable extension of time for the completion of the Required Improvements may be granted, at the discretion of the City Council, upon a showing by the Subdivider that there is good cause for an extension and that the work has been diligently prosecuted from the Effective Date of this Agreement. b). If the construction of the Required Improvements is not completed and accepted within the timelines specified herein, or as lawfully extended, then the Subdivision and all development approvals shall be deemed lapsed and shall have no further effect. Page 206 of 235 6. Lot Sales, Building Permits, Plat Recording. No Building Permits will be issued until such time as all of the Required Improvements are completed in accordance with the phasing plan in this Agreement and, with respect to public improvements, accepted by the City, except that building permits may be issued if Subdivider provides a Financial Assurance to the City conforming to Section Eight, below. No final plat for the Subdivision, or any phase thereof, shall be executed by the City or submitted for recording until such time as either: a) all of the Required Improvements are completed in accordance with this Agreement and, with respect to public improvements, accepted by the City; or b) a Financial Assurance conforming to Section Eight is delivered to the City. Subdivider shall not convey or purport to convey any lot within the Subdivision prior to the recording of the final plat. Any purported conveyance of lots by Subdivider prior to approval and recording of a final plat for any phase of the Subdivision, or otherwise in violation of this Agreement, shall be void. 7. Acceptance of Improvements, Warranty. All of the public improvements comprising the Required Improvements shall be subject to quality assurance testing and inspection as specified in the Construction Plans and/or applicable reference standards. Subdivider or its authorized representative shall provide not less than forty (48) hours minimum notification to City when inspection is required. The costs associated with such testing and inspection shall be the responsibility of Subdivider. Any work which is rejected following inspection must be repaired or replaced at the sole cost of the Subdivider. Any work which is covered up prior to inspection may be rejected, in which case Subdivider shall be solely responsible for exposing the work and arranging for inspection. a). The acceptance by the City of the public improvements comprising the Required Improvements following completion and satisfactory inspection shall constitute a dedication and conveyance by the Subdivider to the City of all such improvements. Subdivider shall convey all public improvements to the City free and clear of any mechanic liens, claims, or other encumbrances. b). Subdivider warrants that all public improvements dedicated to the City shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner, in accordance with approved plans and specifications, and that all such improvements shall be free of defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance by the City. Subdivider shall promptly repair or replace any defective work following receipt of written notice under this warranty from the City. c). To partially secure this obligation, Subdivider shall deposit with the City the sum of THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FORTY SIX DOLLARS ($3,246.00), which sum is equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction cost, as determined by the City Engineer, for public improvements Page 207 of 235 comprising the Required Improvements (the Warranty Deposit). d). The Warranty Deposit shall be paid by the Subdivider no later than fifteen (15) calendar days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. In the absence of any unperformed warranty claims, the City shall refund the Warranty Deposit to Subdivider upon expiration of the warranty period for the subject improvements. In the event of any default following delivery of written notice to Subdivider with respect to Subdivider’s warranty obligations, the City may elect to draw upon the warranty deposit to cure, in whole or in part, any breach of warranty. e). Subdivider additionally warrants that all public improvements shall be delivered free and clear of any mechanic liens or other encumbrances. The City may require receipt of executed mechanic lien releases as a condition precedent to dedication of the public improvements. 8. Financial Assurance. If the Required Improvements are not completed within the one hundred eighty (180) day deadline specified in this Agreement, or if Subdivider desires to record a final plat or obtain a building permit in advance of the completion of all of the Required Improvements, then the Subdivider may, subject to approval by the City, deliver a Financial Assurance, in a form acceptable to the City for the use and benefit of City and to secure the completion of the Required Improvements. The Financial Assurance shall be in the form of a performance/payment bond, escrow account, letter of credit or other financial instrument approved by the City Attorney in an amount which is not less than one hundred forty percent (140%) of the construction cost set forth in the Plat and Construction Plans of Exhibit 2, and as reviewed and approved by the City Engineer in writing, of the remaining improvements which are not completed. If a Financial Assurance is approved according to this Section Eight, Subdivider shall have up to one hundred eighty (180) additional days from the Effective Date of this Agreement in which to complete the Required Improvements. 9. Cease and Desist Notice. If the Required Improvements have not been completed within the time provided in this Agreement or, in lieu of same, a Financial Assurance approved pursuant to Section Eight, above, then the City may issue an immediate cease and desist order to Subdivider and all work shall be discontinued until such time as an acceptable Financial Assurance has been established. If Subdivider fails to take timely steps to deliver an acceptable Financial Assurance or complete the Required Improvements, then the City may record in the land records an Affidavit of Lapse of Plat/Plan and invoke such other remedies as may be available under this Agreement or at law. 10. Partial Releases of Financial Assurance. Upon partial completion of any class of improvements within the Required Improvements Subdivider may request a partial Page 208 of 235 release of the Financial Assurance. The amount of the release shall be equal to the agreed cost of the completed improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. Partial releases shall not be made for partial completion of a class of improvements. a). In order for Subdivider to receive such partial release, the following shall be presented to City: i. A completed Escrow/Financial Assurance Partial Release Form supplied by City and signed by a professional engineer serving as agent for Subdivider; ii. Copies of all quality assurance test results/inspection reports required for the completed improvements; iii. Copies of all weight/quantity tickets for materials incorporated in the work for all items that were estimated on the basis of weight/quantity; and iv. Copies of all invoices or receipts for materials delivered to the site and incorporated in to the work for which a partial release is being requested. b). The partial release request shall be reviewed for completeness and accuracy by City Public Works Director and/or City Engineer. The City may adjust the amount of the request if field inspection shows that quantities are not accurate, or all items of work have not been completed in accordance with the approved Construction Plans. c). City shall process a release request promptly following receipt of a complete application. 11. Final Release of Financial Assurance. If applicable, upon completion of all Required Improvements in accordance with the approved Construction Plans, Subdivider may request that the remainder of the Financial Assurance be released, provided that Subdivider delivers executed mechanic lien waivers/releases from all contractors who performed work on the project and all suppliers who supplied materials that were incorporated into the work, together with a written certification by Subdivider that all outstanding charges for the Required Improvements have been paid and that there are no other liens, encumbrances, or other restrictions affecting the improvements. 12. Use of Financial Assurance upon Default. Upon delivery of written notice to the Subdivider and expiration of any cure period, the City may then elect to draw upon the Financial Assurance as it deems necessary for the completion of improvements or cure of any default under this Agreement. 13. Zoning Compliance. Certificates of Occupancy for structures within the Property shall only be issued upon satisfactory completion and acceptance of all Required Page 209 of 235 Improvements as provided in this Agreement. 14. Default, Remedies, Lapse of Plat/Plan. All provisions of this Agreement are material and any violation is grounds for declaration of Default. Prior to invoking any remedies for Default under this Agreement the City shall deliver written notice to the Subdivider describing the act, event, or omission constituting a default, and allowing Subdivider a period of thirty (30) days in which to cure or abate the violation. Cure within that period reinstates this Agreement. a). Upon declaration of default the City may exercise any remedies for violation available under City ordinances or Utah statutes, including, without limitation: i) proceeding against the Financial Assurance; ii). withholding building permits, certificates of occupancy, or certificates of zoning compliance; iii) obtaining an injunction to halt or abate zoning violations or breaches of this Agreement; iv) recording an affidavit of a lapse of plat/plan, in whole or in part; v) commencing an action for damages—including damages for costs incurred in completing, repairing, or replacing Required Improvements or abating any violations; and/or vi) any other remedies available at law or equity, including the remedy of specific performance. The City may combine remedies in its discretion and pursue some or all at different times, as may fit the applicable breach. b). The recording of an affidavit of lapse of plat/plan by the City shall result in the lapse of all prior land use approvals and the voiding of the subdivision of lots within the real property specified in the affidavit. 15. General Provisions. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Subdivider in the ownership or development of all or any portion of the Property. Assignment of this Agreement shall require the mutual approval of the City and the proposed assignee, in writing. a). This Agreement is the product of mutual bargaining. All terms shall be construed in accordance with their plain meaning, regardless of the extent to which either party participated in the drafting. b). Failure of a party to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right, nor shall any course of dealing or previous action or inaction be deemed a waiver of any rights or claims arising with respect to later or subsequent breaches, acts or omissions. c). The term “Agreement” includes this Improvements Agreement, all exhibits hereto, the Final Plat/Plan for the Subdivision, and all phases thereof, and all related design drawings, which documents shall constitute the sole and complete Agreement between the parties. The Agreement shall supersede all prior Agreements or representations, however evidenced. Page 210 of 235 No modification to any of the terms of this Agreement shall be binding, unless reduced to writing and lawfully executed by both parties. d). The place of performance of this Agreement is Grand County, Utah. In the event of any legal dispute concerning the subjects of this Agreement, the parties agree that the exclusive venue shall be the Seventh Judicial District Court, Grand County, Utah. In any such proceedings arising under this Agreement, regardless of the denomination of the legal claims, the parties waive trial to a jury on all claims and agree that the action shall be decided by the court sitting without a jury. e). In any legal proceeding arising from this Agreement the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs in addition to any other relief authorized herein. f). This Agreement shall be governed by Utah law. g). This Agreement does not create any third party beneficiary rights. It is specifically understood by the parties that; i. the Project is a private development; ii. the City of Moab has no interest in, responsibilities for, or duty to third parties concerning any improvements to the Property, unless/until the City accepts dedication of public improvements pursuant to this Agreement; and iii. except as otherwise provided herein, Subdivider shall have full power and exclusive control of the Property. h). The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and if any portion should be held to be invalid or unenforceable, then the remainder of this Agreement shall be construed to be in full force without reference to the invalid provision. i). In the event of any legal dispute arising from this Agreement neither party shall be liable to the other for consequential damages, lost profits, or delay related damages of any kind. j). All notices under this Agreement shall be given in writing by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or by hand delivery or delivery by a reputable courier, and sent to the following addresses: To the City of Moab: City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Attn: City Manager Page 211 of 235 To Subdivider: Chad Harris and Margaret Harris P.O. Box 301 Moab, UT 84532 Email: cc@msdland.com k). Notice may be delivered to such other parties or addresses as the parties may designate in writing from time to time. A notice sent by mail shall be deemed delivered no later than three (3) days from the date that it is mailed. l). Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to waive any governmental or other immunity to which the City is entitled under law. 16. Indemnity. Subdivider shall indemnify and hold the City harmless with respect to any third party claims, including claims for property damage, injury, or death, and any demands, liabilities, causes of action, costs, or damages, including reasonable attorney’s fees, that may arise from any act or omission of the Subdivider, its members, managers, employees, agents, or contractors in connection with the development of the Subdivision and/or the performance of this Agreement. 17. Future Legislative Power. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to impair or limit the future legislative power or zoning authority of the City. 18. Grading. All grading and soil disturbance undertaken in the development of the Subdivision shall be performed in conformity with Appendix J of the International Building Code (IBC) as adopted by the City. 19. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement is the date when it is signed by all Parties and the Council has approved the final plan for Phases One through Three of the Subdivision. 20. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in separate original counterparts which, when combined, shall constitute the entire Agreement. Exhibits: 1.—Legal Description of the Property 2. – Plat and Construction Plans Page 212 of 235 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the City of Moab, acting by and through the Moab City Council, which has duly authorized execution, and by Subdivider as of the date(s) specified below. CITY OF MOAB: ___________________ Mayor David L. Sakrison Date ATTEST: ___________________ Rachel Stenta Date City Recorder SUBDIVIDER: 3 ___________________ Chad Harris Date _____________________________ ____________________ Margaret Harris Date STATE OF UTAH ) )ss. COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing agreement was executed before me by Chad Harris, this _____ day of ____________, 2017. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ______________________. ______________________________ Notary Public, State of Utah Address: ______________________ Page 213 of 235 STATE OF UTAH ) )ss. COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing agreement was executed before me by Margaret Harris, this _____ day of ____________, 2017. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ______________________. ______________________________ Notary Public, State of Utah Address: ______________________ STATE OF UTAH ) )ss. COUNTY OF GRAND ) The foregoing agreement was executed before me by the CITY OF MOAB by and through David Sakrison, this _____ day of ____________, 2017. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: ______________________. ______________________________ Notary Public, State of Utah Address: ______________________ Page 214 of 235 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A DESCRIPTION OF LDT 22 OF THE BOWEN PLAT OF NICHOLS-BOWEN SUBDIVISION, SECTION 6, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SE CORNER OF LOT 22 OF THE BOWEN PLAT OF NICHOLS-BOWEN SUBDIVISION, SAID CORNER BEARS N 56 41144 11E 43.01 FT. FROM THE CENTERLINE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEST BOWEN CIRCLE AND NORTH BOWEN CIRCLE, PROCEEDING THENCE N B7 °4610011W 1 65.00 FT. TO THE SW CORNER OF SAID LOT 22, THENCE N 02 °14 100"E 1 60.00 FT. TD THE NW CORNER OF SAID LOT 22, THENCE s B7°4610011E (RECORD=S B7 °24'El 165.00 FT. TO THE NE CORNER OF SAID LOT 22, THENCE S 02°14 'oo"w 160.00 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 0.61 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. CORNERS ARE MONUMENTED AS SPECIFIED ON THE ATTACHED PLAT. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF BOWEN CIRCLE (BEARING=S B7°4610011 E). ____________________________________________________________ Page 215 of 235 EXHIBIT 2 1 of 9EXHIBIT 2Page 216 of 235 EXHIBIT 2 2 of 9Page 217 of 235 EXHIBIT 2 3 of 9Page 218 of 235 EXHIBIT 2 4 of 9Page 219 of 235 EXHIBIT 2 5 of 9Page 220 of 235 EXHIBIT 2 6 of 9Page 221 of 235 EXHIBIT 2 7 of 9Page 222 of 235 EXHIBIT 2 8 of 9Page 223 of 235 Project OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST Updated November 28, 2016 Phase 1 Item Description Quantity Units Unit Price Total 1 Excavation 402 cu yd $4.00 $1,608.00 2 4" Hot Asphalt Mix 3,331 sq ft 2.13 7,095.03 3 8" Type II Road Base Course 3,331 sq ft 0.80 2,664.80 4 30" Curb & Gutter (w/ Type II Base)125 ln ft 13.50 1,687.50 7 Sewer Lateral 4"1 each 800.00 800.00 8 8" C900 903 ln ft 25.00 22,575.00 10 Water Meter Service (1")1 each 744.00 744.00 11 Relocate light/power pole 1 each 2,173.00 2,173.00 Subtotal $39,347.33 15% Contingency $5,902.10 Total Amount $45,249.43 K9538 Buen Camino Subdivision Moab, Utah The user of the above opinion of probable construction cost understands that Rosenberg Associates , the Consultant, has no control over the cost or availability of labor, equipment or materials, or over market conditions or the Contractors method of pricing, and that the Consultants opinions of probable construction costs are made on the basis of the Consultants professional judgement and experience. The Consultant makes no warranty, express or implied, that the bids or the negotiated cost of the Work will not vary from the above. EXHIBIT 2 9 of 9 Page 224 of 235 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 #: 9‐3 Title: Pack Creek Bank Grading Project ‐ Change Order Date Submitted: December 4, 2017 Staff Presenter: Chuck Williams, City Engineer Attachment(s): Change order form Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: I move to approve the Pack Creek Bank Grading Project Change Order. Background/Summary: The project included restoration of Pack Creek’s natural streambank by removal and disposal of fill dirt and concrete debris buried therein, and regrading of the streambank to match the historical slope. Contractor has substantially completed work, and it has been determined that more concrete had to be excavated than was anticipated. The attached change order reflects additional costs of removing the actual quantity of concrete found. Page 225 of 235 Change ~Order No. -+----"---Effective Date: --------------r----------+--~ Owner's Contract No.: Date of Contract: Contractor:£'~ S' Engineer's Project No.: \ The Contract Docum nts are modified as follows u on execution of this CHan e Order: Original Contract Price: I I $ J-ll',l.-1b .\DO I [Increase] [Decrease] f rom previously approved Change orders No. _1_ to No. 1 : I $ i .c=::: Contract Price prior to \this ahange Order: $ k(e, 2-lo. o b ~ecrease] ~f this Change Order: I $ ?J, \V'\ ?J ,t;"q go~tract Price incorpJ rating this Change $ 2.~ 3 Jt;l) CHANGE IN CONTRACtr TIMES: Original Contract Times: [EI. Working days C da s Substantial completion (cfays or date): ·io cl~s · I Ready for final payment (days or dat~): J::eG · l o, W l'fr- 1 [Increase] [Decrease] from previously approved Chang ~ Orders No. __ 1_ to No. _1_: Substantial completion (days):-------- Ready for final payment (days):-------- Contract Times prior to this Change Order: Substantial completion (days or date)~ _____ _ Ready for final payment (days or date): ___ _ [Increase] [Decrease] of this Change Order: Substantial completion (days or date)~ ____ _ Ready for final payment (days or date): ___ _ . I Contract Times with all approved Change Orderp: • ' Substantial completion (days or date):: lO C ~k?ritaK~C\yS . Ready for final payment (days or date): Atf· I 01 '}{)l 1-!· ACCEPTED: ACCEPT ED: By: J By:--------- Engineer (Autho ~1zed Owner (Authorized Date: Date: ----------------- Approved by Funding Agenlcy (if applicable): By: __ ~----------+--­ Cohtractor (Authori ed Date :~------+-- Date: Prepared by the ngineers Joint Contract Documents Committee and endorsed by the Construction Sp~cifications Institute. 0312017 CHANGE 0 I DER 380.06.100 Page 00 63 ~3 -1 I I Page 226 of 235 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: December 12, 2017 #: 9‐4 Title: FY2018 Budget Opening #1 ‐ Updated Date Submitted: December 8, 2017 Staff Presenter: David Everitt Attachment(s): ‐ November 7 Memo ‐ Updated spreadsheet of recommended changes Recommended Motion: None at this time. Information only. Background/Summary: Update: Since the November council meeting, staff have identified a few additional items for consideration: 1. Increase revenue and expenses (no net change) to the garbage collection budget to reflect the increase landfill tipping fees going into effect January 1. This is in anticipation of a rate increase for commercial waste pickup. If the Council does not approve that increase, the budget will not be affected. 2. MIC contribution. CNHA requested funds to support bathrooms staying open at the Moab Information Center. 3. Efficiency services study. Grand County has set aside $60,000 to examine opportunities to provide more efficient local government services. They have requested that the City match those funds. 4. Rosemarie Russo initiated and received a Grant from Rocky Mountain Power in the amount of $50,000 to install Electric Vehicle charging stations. The grant agreement will be on a future agenda and we will need to reflect those funds in both Revenue and Expenditures in the Capital Projects Fund. Page 227 of 235 From November 14, 2017: From time to time, it is necessary to amend the adopted annual budget to adjust revenues and expenses, account for unplanned budget items, and reprioritize spending. This is the first of two or three budget amendments that you will see before the end of the fiscal year (including the closeout amendments). Compared to last year’s first budget amendment, this one is not nearly as substantial. There are no major personnel or capital project additions, and most substantial changes are one‐time expenses that may not be needed in future budgets. Details are in the attached memo and spreadsheet. Page 228 of 235       November 7, 2017 To: Moab City Council From: David Everitt Re: Budget Opening #1, FY 2017-18 Dear Councilmembers, From time to time, it is necessary to amend the adopted annual budget to adjust revenues and expenses, account for unplanned budget items, and reprioritize spending. This is the first of two or three budget amendments that you will see before the end of the fiscal year (including the closeout amendments). Compared to last year’s first budget amendment, this one is not nearly as substantial. Generally, the better practice is to avoid significant policy- and personnel-related changes midyear, and we have attempted to minimize the recommended changes in this budget amendment accordingly. There are no major personnel or capital project additions, and most substantial changes are one-time expenses that may not be needed in future budgets. The one exception to this is the proposed increase needed to cover the increase in health insurance premiums for employees. Also, it is simply too early to perform any useful revenue analysis; with only 2-3 months’ worth of revenue in so far, we are not in a place to recommend any significant adjustments. Sales tax trends remain encouraging, however, and culinary water and sewer fund revenues appear to be on track as budgeted. Highlights Overall, the recommended changes result in: - General Fund: a net increase of $231,573 (2%), with $98,704 coming from General Fund balance; - Recreation Fund: an increase of $11,383 for insurance premiums, to be paid for via a General Fund transfer - Millcreek Fund: a net impact of $3,000 for tree plantings and education, to be paid for out of the Millcreek Fund balance; - Capital Projects: no net change because of transfers in and out of this fund; - Culinary Water: a net impact of $12,008 for insurance premiums - Sewer Enterprise Fund: a net impact to the operational budget of $18,344; and - Storm Water Enterprise Fund: a net impact of $4,736. - Class C and CDBG funds are unaffected. Significant departmental changes are as follows: All departments: - Health insurance premiums and wellness program costs are spread out over every department ($102,362); some departments had additional changes in benefit amounts due to changes in staff. Page 229 of 235  2  Police: ‐ One-time cash infusion ($39,450) from the Cat Room construction leftover funds – to be used in the service of all things feline at the Shelter. Engineering: ‐ One-time expenses associated with arrival of City Engineer, some equipment computer- related replacements and upgrades, and some safety equipment purchases ($9,000) Recorder: ‐ IT needs a couple of new switches for city facilities ($8,000) Administration: ‐ Consolidated gift card program to Admin budget ($6,000) ‐ Added funding to continue the “premium” plan for local print ads ($15,000) Capital Projects: ‐ Pass-through for grant for Bark Park improvements ($10,000) ‐ Funds for vehicle leases for Police as approved during October council meeting ($14,563) ‐ Purchase of a “changeable message sign” for multiple uses around the city ($35,000) – events, street closures, new traffic patterns, emergencies, etc. Culinary Water: ‐ Fully funded SCADA upgrades based on bid amounts ($100,000) ‐ Funded truck request ($55,000) Sewer: ‐ Made various corrections to operations budget ($18,344) ‐ Moved funds from Equipment to Sewer Replacement Projects ($200,000) Storm Water: ‐ Pass through of grant funds for riparian restoration project ‐ Adjusted revenue down based on not passing new rates yet (-$75,000) ‐ Reduced personnel expenses because position not hired yet (-$34,000) Page 230 of 235 Resolution #58-2017 Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION # 58‐2017    A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 BUDGET    WHEREAS, the City of Moab has proposed to amend the 2017/2018 fiscal year budget for the various funds;    NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE 2017/2018 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET SHALL BE AMENDED AS  FOLLOWS:  Amended Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Budget          Amended    Amended          Revenue  Expenditures  1. General Fund ($12,109,730) $  12,109,730   2. Recreation Fund ($1,745,679) $ 1,745,679  3. Millcreek Fund  ($456,000)  $456,000  4. Capital Projects Fund ($ 2,123,003) $ 2,123,003  5. Enterprise Water Operating ($ 1,212,015) $ 1,002,522  6. Enterprise Water Capital Expenses   $ 473,000  7. Enterprise Sewer Operating ($ 1,778,068) $ 1,336,717  8. Enterprise Sewer Capital Expenses   $ 12,582,200  9. Enterprise Storm Water Operating  ($245,264) $ 79,000  10. Enterprise Storm Water Capital Expenses   $ 365,964        2017/2018 Fiscal Year Budget Amendments     FUNDS   Account # Account Name Adjustment Amount    General Fund      Revenue   10‐32‐210 Commercial Building Permits  $                (35,000.00)  10‐36‐970 Insurance Income  $                (12,022.00)  10‐39‐940 General Fund Beg Balance  $               (168,704.00)  10‐39‐950 Transfer from Other Funds  $                (85,847.00)  10‐34‐200 Garbage Billing/Collection  $                (35,000.00)    Total Revenue  $              (336,573.00)  General Fund   Expenses   Administrative      10‐414‐22 Public Notices  $                   15,500.00   10‐414‐10 Salaries & Wages  $                (33,182.00)  10‐414‐13 Benefits  $                (17,694.00)  10‐414‐17 Employee Bonus Program  $                     6,000.00   10‐414‐31 Professional & Technical  $                   60,000.00  Page 231 of 235 Resolution #58-2017 Page 2 of 5 Recorder      10‐415‐13 Benefits  $                   47,260.00     Information Technology      10‐430‐74 Equipment  $                     8,000.00     Engineering      10‐419‐13 Benefits  $                     4,959.00   10‐419‐23 Travel  $                     3,500.00   10‐419‐24 Office Expense & Supplies  $                     5,000.00   10‐419‐30 Monthly Fuel ‐ Gascard  $                         500.00   10‐419‐46 Special Departmental Supplies  $                     3,000.00   Treasurer      10‐420‐13 Benefits  $                     2,740.00   Police      10‐421‐25  Equipment Supplies &  Maintenance  $                     3,022.00   10‐421‐13 Benefits  $                   30,335.00   Animal Control      New Line Item Grant Expenses ‐ Donor  $                   39,450.00   10‐426‐13 Benefits  $                     2,596.00   Streets      10‐440‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     8,598.00   10‐440‐42 Street Lights  $                (10,000.00)  Sanitation    10‐442‐31 Professional & Technical  $                     30,000.00  Facilities      10‐443‐26.3 Center Street Gym  $                     9,000.00   10‐443‐13 Employee Benefits  $                   10,215.00   Safety      10‐451‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     1,842.00   10‐441‐25  Equipment Supplies &  Maintenance  $                   (2,000.00)  Fleet      10‐444‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     2,740.00   Parks      10‐451‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     9,020.00   Film Commission      10‐428‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     1,797.00   Planning      10‐418‐13 Employee Benefits  $                   34,180.00   10‐418‐10 Salaries & Wages  $                   33,812.00     Community Contributions      10‐460‐80 Moab Information Center  $                   10,000.00     Transfers      Page 232 of 235 Resolution #58-2017 Page 3 of 5 10‐480‐86 Transfer to Recreation Fund  $                   11,383.00     Total Expenses  $                231,573.00          Recreation Fund   Revenue   23‐33‐562 City of Moab  $                (11,383.00)   Total Revenue  $                (11,383.00)  Expenses   23‐640‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     5,526.00   23‐452‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     3,117.00   23‐800‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     2,740.00     Total Expenses  $                   11,383.00          Millcreek Project Fund    Revenue   28‐33‐579 Future Grants  $                   (3,000.00)  28‐39‐209 Beginning FB  $                   (3,000.00)   Total Revenue  $                   (6,000.00)  Expenses   28‐400‐76 Tree Advertising/Education  $                     1,500.00   28‐400‐86 Trees/Irrigation  $                     4,500.00    Total Expenses  $                     6,000.00          Capital Projects Fund    Revenue   41‐36‐124 Grants  $                (60,000.00)  41‐39‐561 Cap Projects Beg Fund Balance  $                (39,450.00)  Total Revenue  $                (99,450.00)  Expenses   41‐791‐50 Police Equipment  $                     2,000.00   41‐791‐50 Police Equipment  $                   12,563.00   41‐780‐44 Park Improvements  $                   10,000.00   41‐440‐80 Transportation Master Plan  $                (30,000.00)  41‐780‐46 Public Works Equipment  $                   35,000.00   New Line Item Dark Sky Capital Improvement  $                   34,040.00   New Line Item Transfer to General Fund  $                   85,847.00   41‐770‐50 City Center Bldg Improvements  $              (100,000.00)  41‐770‐55 City Sustainability  $                   50,000.00   Total Expenses  $                   99,450.00          Water Fund   Page 233 of 235 Resolution #58-2017 Page 4 of 5 Operating Revenue   New line item Grant  $                (90,000.00)    Operating Expenses   51‐500‐13 Employee Benefits  $                   12,008.00     Capital Expenses   Projects:   Water Study   $                   90,000.00   Millcreek Dr. PRV and Water line Replacement  $              (150,000.00)  Fire Hydrants   $                   (5,000.00)  Equipment ‐ SCADA System   $                100,000.00     Direct Purchases:   1661.2 ‐ Equipment ‐ water Replacement Truck  $                   55,000.00            Sewer Fund   Operating Revenue   52‐57‐200 Sewer Existing Facility Fee  $                (41,953.00)  52‐57‐210 Sewer Studies Fee  $                   (2,021.00)  Total Operating Revenue  $                (43,974.00)  Non‐operating Revenue  52‐56‐111 Sewer Impact Fees  $                   43,974.00    Total Non‐Operating Revenue  $                   43,974.00     Operating Expenses   52‐600‐10 Salaries & Wages  $                   40,488.00   52‐600‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     2,951.00   52‐600‐27 WWTP ‐ Utilities  $                   20,000.00   52‐600‐82 Interest on Sewer Bonds  $                   15,857.00   52‐610‐13 Employee Benefits  $                     1,322.00   52‐610‐15 Overtime  $                     4,000.00   52‐610‐25 Equipment Supplies & Maint  $                (10,000.00)  52‐610‐26 Bldg/Grds Supplies & Maint  $                   (1,000.00)  52‐610‐27 Utilities  $                     1,000.00   52‐610‐29 Rentals  $                   (2,500.00)  52‐610‐31 Professional & Technical  $                (13,500.00)  52‐610‐33 Education  $                   (2,400.00)  52‐610‐35 Freight  $                     1,600.00   52‐610‐46 Spec Dept Supplies  $                     4,500.00     Total Operating Expenses  $                   62,318.00     Capital Expenses   Page 234 of 235 Resolution #58-2017 Page 5 of 5 Sewer Projects   Sanitary Sewer Replacement  Projects Interest Payment  $                200,000.00     Total Capital Projects  $                200,000.00     Direct Purchases:   1661.3 Equipment ‐ sewer   $              (200,000.00)   Total Direct Purchases  $              (200,000.00)           Storm Water Utility  Fund   Operating Revenue   53‐36‐460 Non‐Point Source Financial Assist  $                (36,264.00)  53‐36‐450 Storm Water Drainage Fee  $                 75,000.00    Total Operating Revenue  $                38,736.00  Operating Expenses   53‐400‐10 Salaries & Wages  $                (19,000.00)  53‐400‐13 Employee Benefits  $                (15,000.00)   Total Operating Expense  $                (34,000.00)    Capital Expenses  Projects:  Pack Creek Bank Restoration Project  $                   36,264.00     Total Capital Projects  $                   36,264.00         PASSED AND ADOPTED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of the City of Moab this 12th  day of December, 2017.      David L. Sakrison    Mayor  ATTEST:      Rachel E. Stenta  City of Moab   Page 235 of 235