HomeMy Public PortalAbout2007-06-12 PLANNING COMMISSION - item05
AGENDA ITEM # 5
MINUTES: 2-13-07
/ I
I
I
I
LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.
Februarv 13. 2007
The Lynwood Planning Commission met in regular session in Bateman Hall, Room # I.
Chair Gomez called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
Commissioner West led the flag salute.
Chair Gomez requested roll call.
Development Services Manager Colin called roll.
Chair Gomez presiding.
Commissioner's Castro-Ramirez, Enciso, Manlapaz, Morton Patel and West answered
the roll call.
Also present were Deputy City Attorney Tara Taguchi, Development Services Manager
Jonathan Colin and Planning Assistant Karen Figueredo.
Chair Gomez asked staff if the agenda had been duly posted.
Development Services Manager Colin stated the agenda had been duly posted In
accordance with the Brown Act
Item #5: MINUTES - Januarv 9. 2007
Chair Gomez announced agenda Item #5, Minutes of the January 9, 2007 Planning
Commission meeting and asked if the Commission had any comments or revisions.
Motion by Commissioner Manlapaz to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of
January 9, 2007, 2nd by Commissioner Enciso.
Chair Gomez requested roll call.
Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve passed 7-0.
Item #6: Swearinl!: in Speakers
Chair Gomez requested that City Clerk Andrea Hooper swear in speakers in English and
in Spanish.
City Clerk Hooper duly swore in members of the public wishing to speak on any agenda
item.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item #7: Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-17
APPLICANT: Alex Benavides I Wiseman Dawoody
10820 Atlantic A venue
APN 6194-001-048
Chair Gomez announced continued public hearing agenda item #7 and requested the staff
report.
Development Services Manager Colin presented the staff report and stated the project has
been continued several times due to fire department concerns and a revised rendering.
The applicant proposes to construct a 6,065 square foot commercial building on property
located at 10820 Atlantic Avenue in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone on a property
totaling 18,371 square feet in area. The applicant also requests approval of a variance to
reduce the side and rear yards from five feet (5') to zero feet (0') and consolidate five (5)
lots into one (I) parcel. The project will provide twenty-seven (27) parking stalls
including one (I) loading stall and two (2) handicap stalls. Staff met with the developer
at the Site Plan Review Committee to reiterate code requirements and conditions of
approval.
Chair Gomez opened the public hearing.
Alex Benavides, 8054 Telegraph Road, Downey, CA spoke in favor of the project stating
he has worked with staff to address all code requirements and concerns.
Chair Gomez inquired about the parking, size of the building and any potential tenants.
Wiseman Dawoody, inaudible address?, spoke in support of the project and stated they
do not have any tenants at this time.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez arrived at 6:37 p.m.
Commissioner West inquired about the number of tenant spaces.
Mr. Dawoody stated it would depend on how much building area each tenant would
require for their business.
Chair Gomez requested review of the rendering.
Development Services Manager Colin referred to the rendering identifying colors,
materials, architectural style and amenities.
Commissioner West inquired about graffiti and the use of creeping fig vines to
discourage graffiti on bare walls.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez referred to the site plan stating 9% of the lot area would be
landscaping and inquired about the type of plant materials.
Mr. Benavides stated the setback area would have sod, palm trees and shrubs.
Development Services Manager Colin stated a detailed landscaping and irrigation plan is
required.
Chair Gomez inquired about the type of palm trees.
Commissioner West stated the type of palm trees should not damage the sidewalk.
Development Services Manager Colin stated the landscaping plan can be referred to
Public Works for review and recommendations.
Commissioner Enciso inquired about the construction schedule.
Mr. Benavides stated they planned to move forward as quickly as possible with plan
check, grading and construction.
Chair Gomez inquired about a trash enclosure.
Development Services Manager Colin identified the trash enclosure on the site plan.
Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about the variance for the setbacks.
Mr. Dawoody stated they have down sized the project several times for parking and to
meet setback requirements would make the project financially infeasible.
Chair Gomez closed the public hearing.
Commissioner West stated he wanted to make sure the royal palms are compatible with
the area.
Chair Gomez asked if there is a motion.
Motion by Commissioner Manlapaz to approve the project subject to the following
entitlements:
Adopt Resolution 3154 approving Variance No. 2006-02
Adopt Resolution 3155 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-17;
Adopt Resolution 3156 approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-07 (64758).
2nd by Commissioner Enciso.
Chair Gomez requested roll call.
Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve the three (3)
zoning entitlements passed 7-0.
A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING VARIANCE NO.
2006-02, REDUCING SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS FROM 5 FEET TO 0 FEET
IN CONJUCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 6,065 SQUARE FOOT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10820 ATLANTIC
A VENUE IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, FUTHER DESCRIBED
AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6194-001-048, CITY OF LYNWOOD,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
ROLL CALL
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CASTRO-RAMIREZ, ENCISO, GOMEZ, MANLAPAZ, MORTON,
PATEL & WEST
NONE
NONE
NONE
A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF L YNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 2006-17 TO CONSTRUCT A COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT
10820 ATLANTIC AVENUE, IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) FURTHER
DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6194-001-048, CITY OF
L YNWOOD, COUTNY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
ROLL CALL
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CASTRO-RAMIREZ, ENCISO, GOMEZ, MANLAPAZ, MORTON,
PATEL & WEST
NONE
NONE
. NONE
A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 2006-07 (64758), CONSOLIDATING FIVE (5) PARCELS
INTO ONE (1) LOT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
6,065 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 10820 ATLANTIC AVENUE, IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE,
FURTHER DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6194-001-048, CITY
OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
ROLL CALL
AYES:
CASTRO-RAMIREZ, ENCISO, GOMEZ, MANLAPAZ, MORTON,
PATEL & WEST
NONE
NONE
NONE
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item #8: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-01
APPLICANT: Neil Smith and Cory Sims
3246 Euclid Avenue
APN 6176-010-012
Chair Gomez announced new public hearing agenda item #8 and requested the staff
report.
Development Services Manager Colin stated staff is recommending continuance of the
application before you due to fire department conditions.
Planning Assistant Figueredo presented the staff report and stated the subject property
totals 12,383 square feet in area and is located on the south side of Euclid Avenue
between Alpine Avenue and Oak Avenue in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
The applicant is requesting approval to develop two attached residences, two-stories in
height, with a new detached two-car garage on the rear of the property. The existing
residence and four-car garage at the front of the property would remain. Each residence
consists of three bedrooms, two and a half baths with a two-car garage. Landscaping
exceeds the minimum 35%, the Lynwood Municipal Code allows one residence per 2,420
square feet of property and the lot is large enough to accommodate a maximum of five
(5) residences.
Chair Gomez asked if there are any questions or staff.
Chair Gomez opened the public hearing.
Deputy City Attorney Taguchi stated the applicant arrived after the swearing in and
should be sworn in.
Chair Gomez requested Commissioner Enciso to swear in the applicant.
Commissioner Enciso swore in the applicant.
Cory Sims, 3246 Euclid Avenue spoke in favor. Mr. Sims summarized the project and
stated he is working with the fire department regarding the restricted access of 10 wide
driveway.
Mr. Sims proposes to install fire sprinklers in the duplex and garage instead of
demolishing a portion of the existing residence and requested authorization to submit for
plan check.
Development Services Manager Colin stated no project can move forward without fire
department stamped approval.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez inquired about the fire department time frame.
Development Services Manager Colin stated he hoped to have fire department approval
for the next meeting on March 13,2007.
Chair Gomez continued the item to the next meeting by general consensus.
Item #9: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-02 and Variance No. 2007-01
APPLICANT: Adolph Lopez / Parents Interested in Education (PIE)
3200 Mulford Avenue, Suite 202
Plaza Mexico Shopping Center
Chair Gomez excused himself from this item due to a potential conflict of interest.
Commissioner Enciso excused himself from this item due to a potential conflict of
interest.
Vice-Chair Castro Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #9 and requested
the staff report.
Development Services Manager Colin presented the staff report and stated the applicant
is requesting approval to operate a private school to tutor citizens in obtaining the GED
high school equivalency. The school would be located within a 1,600 square foot tenant
space located at 3200 Mulford Avenue, Suite 202 within the Plaza Mexico Shopping
Center in the CB-l (Controlled Business) zone. Floor plan identities three conference
rooms, restrooms and reception area. The variance is required for the parking deficiency
in Plaza Mexico. Retail, commercial and service establishments require one stall per 250
square feet of building and schools require one stall per 100 square feet of building.
Mr. Colin stated when Plaza Mexico was built the parking requirement was one stall per
400 square feet of building area. Whenever there is a change of use or increase in size,
current parking requirements shall be met, therefore, Plaza Mexico requires 1,951
parking stalls but only provides 1,704. The school requires 15 parking stalls with a
maximum occupancy of 38 persons.
Commissioner Manlapaz inquired if the school required licensing and if the tutors had to
be certified by the State.
Mr. Colin commented that a State license IS not required and State eertification or a
degree is not required for tutoring services.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez suggested the applicant should address the issue of State
licensing and certification and asked if there were any other questions of staff.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez opened the public hearing and requested that the applicant
testi fy.
Walter Lopez, 11209 Birch Street, Lynwood spoke in support. Mr. Lopez stated PIE is a
non-profit organization operating since 1983 at Compton College. Because of the
situation with Compton College the PIE program was ousted and in need of a new
location. Mr. Lopez stated Plaza Mexico offers a location, that PIE is not teachers but
tutors who prepare residents for the GED test to obtain their high school diploma. PIE
employees do not work for any School District but are a private non-profit organization.
Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about compensation to the tutors and how they pay
their rent.
Mr. Lopez stated the tutors are volunteers and funding comes from grants and donations.
Commissioner West inquired about hours of operation.
Mr. Lopez stated Monday through Friday 9am to 6pm and Saturday 9am to Ipm.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez commented on the parking variance reducing parking from
15 to 8 stalls and inquired if PIE encouraged public transportation and how they would
manage Ihe parking.
Mr. Lopez stated they direct students to proper parking areas and do encourage using
public transportation if possible.
Commissioner West inquired about course time frame.
Mr. Lopez stated the tutoring is for three month periods and there is limited class space.
Vice Chair Castro Ramirez inquired about future locations.
Commissioner West inquired about other possible locations.
Mr. Lopez stated they would like to expand if successful and only Plaza Mexico asked
them to move their location to their property.
Commissioner Morton inquired about the need for tutoring that the Lynwood Adult
School provides and the cost. Mr. Morton inquired about who provides the diploma and
qualification requirements of the tutors.
Mr. Lopez stated they are not trying to take away from the adult school but want to assist
citizens to get their degree as many jobs require a degree. The State of California
provides the diploma, the tutors are not required to be certified and PIE prepares citizens
for the test.
Commissioner West inquired about the difference between a high school diploma and a
GED certificate.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez requested that the Planning Commission focus on the
Conditional Use Permit and Variance applications.
Commissioner West expressed concern about the parking variance and the PIE parking
interfering with Plaza Mexico parking as the school operates at the same time as most
businesses.
Mr. Lopez stated the diploma and GED certificate carry the same weight and PIE directs
students to parking areas next to the school.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez asked the applicant if he had read, understood and would
comply with the conditions of approval in the resolution. Ms. Castro-Ramirez stated the
resolution title should be changed from private school to learning facility.
Aide Castro, 4357 Fernwood Avenue, Lynwood spoke in favor of the proposal. PIE is a
learning center and not an adult school. It's a personal choice and citizens can feel more
comfortable at PIE where the adult school may be intimidating. Should not designate
parking spaces as malls do not require designated parking stalls. PIE is a non-profit
organization that seeks grants and donations. Ms. Castro questioned the Planning
Commission inquiries about PIE operating procedures.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez stated it is the Planning Commissions responsibility to
analyze land use applications to ensure compliance with code requirements and install
conditions that protect properties in the area.
Commissioner Manlapaz stated the Commission inquires about pertinent operating
procedures.
Commissioner Morton stated the Commission is charged with making sure applications
comply with code requirements.
Ms. Castro stated she is passionate about PIE as it provides a valuable community
service. Stated the Planning Commission should review the conditional use permit and
variance applications but questions the need to inquire about employees, certifications
and operating procedures.
Irene Garcia, 2737 II! th Street, Lynwood, spoke in opposition stating Plaza Mexico has a
parking deficiency and citizens should go to an adult school.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez closed the public hearing.
Director of Development Services Taylor arrived.
Commissioner Morton inquired about the parking.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated Plaza Mexico has 1,704 stalls and is
required to provide 1,95 I stalls. A change of use from retail to a more intensive use
requires either more parking or a variance. Mr. Taylor stated the code does not address
preferred or assigned parking. Valet parking is available but limited.
Commissioner West inquired about employee parking.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated a previous conditional use permit
requires Plaza Mexico employees to park in the rear of the shopping center and referred
to the site plan.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez inquired about the title being a school verses a learning
center.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated a learning center is a better definition
however the zoning code only identifies public and private education facilities that
require a conditional use permit.
Commissioner Patel made a motion to adopt Resolution 3165 approving Conditional Use
Permit No. 2007-02 and adopt Resolution 3166 approving Variance No. 2007-01.
Commissioner West inquired about changing the Resolution form private school to
learning center.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated a learning center is acceptable if the
Planning Commission concurs.
Commissioner Morton inquired about continuing the item.
Director of Development Services Taylor recommended approval and no continuance.
Commissioner West suggested a condition that states the approval is only for a learning
center and not other services.
Director of Development Services Taylor concurred and stated a condition would be
added and the language approved by the City Attorney.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez requested roll call.
Director of Development Services Taylor called roll and the motion to approve on both
entitlements passed 4-0-3 on the following vote:
Castro Ramirez -
Approve
Enciso -
Abstain
Gomez -
Abstain
Manlapaz -
Approve
Morton -
Abstain
Patel-
Approve
West-
Approve
A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF L YNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 2007-02, TO OPERATE A PRIVATE LEARNING CENTER
OFFERING TUTORING SERVICES FOR ADULTS TO OBTAIN THEIR HIGH
SCHOOL DIPLOMA EQUIVALENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3200
MULFORD A VENUE (PLAZA MEXICO), ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6171-
001 TO 007, IN THE CB-l (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) ZONE, CITY OF
L YNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
ROLL CALL
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CASTRO-RAMIREZ, MANLAPAZ, PATEL & WEST
NONE
NONE
ENCISO, GOMEZ & MORTON
A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF L YNWOOD APPROVING VARIANCE NO.
2007-01, A REQUEST TO REDUCE REQUIRED PARKING TO LESS THAN
ONE STALL PER 200 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA (I.E. EIGHT (8)
SPACES TO OPERATE A PRIVATE LEARNING CENTER LOCATED AT 3200
MULFORD AVENUE IN THE CB-l (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) ZONE,
FURTHER DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6171-001
THROUGH 007, CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA.
ROLL CALL
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CASTRO-RAMIREZ, MANLAPAZ, PATEL & WEST
NONE
NONE
ENCISO, GOMEZ & MORTON
CONTINUED REGULAR AGENDA
Item #10: Status of Pacer Distribution Services- 2700 Imperial Hil!hwav
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez requested that staff notify Chair Gomez and Commissioner
Enciso to return.
Director of Development Services Taylor apologized for being late due to a Special City
Council Meeting budget workshop.
Chair Gomez and Commissioner Enciso returned to the dais.
Chair Gomez announced continued regular agenda item #10 and requested the staff
report.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated the item had been continued and
Planning Commission direction to staff was to address mitigation measures to reduce
impacts on adjacent residential properties, bring back a status report in 30 days and bring
back a final report with recommendations in 60 days. In addition, to have staff notify the
residents of the hearing in 60 days, monitor the property and work with Pacer personnel.
Mr. Taylor stated that staff has taken noise readings on a regular basis and sometimes the
readings are within accepted ranges and sometimes not as it depends on the type and time
of activity. Mr. Taylor stated the last meeting with Pacer personnel included:
Install an 8' block wall on residential property lines;
Creeping fig vines installed on the block wall;
No parking trucks adjacent to wall;
Install no parking signs on wall;
Delineate no parking on asphalt;
Implement and maintain mitigation plan.
Mr. Taylor stated for the most part Pacer has been compliant but there have been a couple
times they parked adjacent to the residences. A summary of the Pacer mitigation plan
was summarized. Mr. Taylor stated a final report would be brought back at the next
meeting.
Chair Gomez inquired about the effectiveness of a sound wall and what should be the
height and landscape screening.
Mr. Taylor stated a solid wall can go as high as eight feet and the wall deflects the noise
up and over so the noise will improve but not go away. Mr. Taylor stated when the
property was developed in 1998 staff should have required a block wall. Mr. Taylor
recommends creeping fig vines.
Ms. Aguirre interrupted Planning Commission deliberations.
Chair Gomez directed Ms. Aguirre to wait for public orals.
Chair Gomez continued the item by general consensus.
NEW REGULAR AGENDA
NONE
PUBLIC ORALS
Mrs. Aguirre, 11441 Plum Street submitted pictures to the Planning Commission. She
stated the staff report was correct except that Pacer is still parking trucks on the
residential property lines. Ms. Aguirre requested that Pacer not be allowed to park
anywhere between the building and residential property lines.
Commissioner Enciso inquired about evening inspections.
Director of Development Services Taylor not to this point but would do a few after hours
inspections based on budget availability.
COMMISSION ORALS
Commissioner West inquired about the APA conference.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated he had not received a flyer but would
inquire and report back.
Commissioner inquired about lot size for a new house.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated in the R-I you need 6,220 square feet, in
the R-2 3,112 square feet, in the R-3 2,420 square feet.
Commissioner Enciso requested reducing density and requiring more lot area.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated reducing residential density would
require a general plan amendment and zoning ordinance amendment. If the Planning
Commission concurs, staff can forward a request to the City Council.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez suggested a survey of other cities regarding density and
development standards.
Director of Development Services Taylor suggested a survey and have staff prepare a
matrix as compared to other cities. Mr. Taylor also stated Lynwood has lower residential
densities than the majority of the surrounding cities.
Commissioner Patel thanked her colleagues and staff.
Commissioner Morton expressed concern about the PIE item.
Commissioner Enciso hoped all his colleagues would continue on the Commission and he
thanked his colleagues.
Commissioner Manlapaz complimented Chair Gomez, Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez and
Mr. Colin on a good job conducting the meeting.
Deputy City Attorney Taguchi suggested now is a good time for the Commissioner's to
report on the seminar in Los Angeles;
Chair Gomez requested a report.
Planning Assistant Figueredo summarized the seminar that she and Commissioners
Manlapaz and Morton attended at the Caltrans building in Los Angeles including the
General Plan, livable communities and transit oriented development.
Commissioner Manlapaz said he enjoyed the seminar as it was very informational.
Commissioner Morton commented the seminar had good speakers and it was educational.
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez suggested a public oral comment time limit of maybe three
minutes. Remind audience that the Commission supports projects and development but
must assure quality development and code compliance.
Chair Gomez commended Mr. Colin and thanked his colleagues for their support.
STAFF ORALS
Director of Development Taylor commended the Planning Commission for their efforts,
thanked his staff and reminded the Planning Commission it is time to reorganize next
month.
Mr. Taylor stated he would bring the Draft Housing Element next month for review but it
would take a number of meetings to adopt.
Mr. Taylor stated the revised trailer park project at 4309 Carlin Avenue would be back
next year.
Mr. Taylor stated the budget workshop was grim and Lynwood may be looking to make
funding and staff cuts.
Jonathan Colin passed out an information form asking the Planning Commission to fill it
out so staff could make an updated list.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner West to adjourn, 2nd by Chair Gomez. Chair Gomez
adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM # 5
MINUTES: 5-8-07
LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING,
Mav 8, 2007
The Lynwood Planning Commission met in regular session in the City Hall Council
Chambers.
Chair Castro-Ramirez called the meeting to order at 6:37 p.m.
Commissioner Araujo led the flag salute.
Chair Castro-Ramirez requested the roll call.
Director of Development Services Taylor called roll.
Chair Castro-Ramirez presiding.
Commissioner's Araujo, Patel, Manlapaz, and Enciso answered the roll call.
Mr. Taylor announced that Commissioner Younger had notified him that he would be out
of town.
Also present were City Attorney Arnoldo Beltran, Director of Development Services
Grant Taylor, Development Services Manager Jonathan Colin, Planning Assistant Karen
Figueredo and Redevelopment Project Manager Bruno Naulls.
Chair Castro-Ramirez inquired if the agenda had been duly posted.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated the agenda had been duly posted in
accordance with the Brown Act a minimum of seventy-two (72) hours prior to the
meeting.
Item #5: MINUTES - April 10, 2007
Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez announced agenda Item #5, Minutes of the April 10, 2007
Planning Commission meeting and asked if there were any questions or corrections.
Motion by Commissioner Manlapaz to approve the April 10, 2007 Minutes, seconded by
Commissioner Patel.
Chair Castro Ramirez requested roll call.
Director of Development Services Taylor called roll and the motion to approve passed 5-
O.
Item #6: Swearinl! In Speakers
Chair Castro-Ramirez requested Commissioner Enciso to swear in citizens wishing to
speak on any agenda item.
Commissioner Enciso duly swore in all speakers.
Development Services Manager translated swearing in to Spanish.
Director of Development Services Taylor identified handouts for the Planning
Commission.
Item #7: Public Orals
Chair Castro-Ramirez announced the item and stated any citizen wishing to testify on any
issue under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission may speak now.
Nobody spoke during public orals.
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chair Castro-Ramirez reorganized the agenda to hear new public hearing agenda item
#11.
Item #11: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-09
APPLICANT: Phoenix House & C-Conrad Group
11300 Atlantic Avenue
APN 6194-020-90 I
Chair Castro-Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda Item #11 and requested a
staff report.
Director of Development Services Taylor presented the staff report and stated the
applicants are requesting approval to operate a transitional housing facility for residential
substance abuse treatment to include drug rehabilitation, mental health screening, referral
services, family planning, vocations assessments and training and job placement on
property owned by the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency (LRA) at 11300 Atlantic
Avenue in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. The facility would house 40 to 60
previously incarcerated women.
Redevelopment Project Manager Naulls stated the LRA had purchased the property with
Housing 20% Set Aside Funds to develop a senior housing project. The developers,
SELAC eventually defaulted on loans and the property has remained vacant. Mr. Naulls
stated the 20% set aside funding is mandated for low or moderate income housing and a
transitional housing facility qualifies.
Chair Castro-Ramirez inquired about sale and rent restrictions.
Commissioner Enciso inquired if the applicant would buy or lease the property.
Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about low and moderate income.
Redevelopment Project Manager Naulls stated the property would have restricted deeds
or leases that would run with the land for 55 years, Phoenix House is requesting a three
year lease and low/moderate income requirements are set forth by HUD.
Chair Castro-Ramirez opened the public hearing.
Winnie Weschler, 11600 Eldridge Avenue, Lake View Terrace, 91342 is the Phoenix
House director and spoke in support. Ms. Weschler summarized the program, identified
other facilities, distributed photographs, and commented on the staff and Planning
Commission tour at the Monrovia facility.
Suzanne Osterman, 343 W. Foothill Boulevard, Monrovia, 91016 is the Monrovia facility
Director of Operations who spoke in support. Ms. Osterman described the programs and
asked her staff and clients in the audience to stand.
Dr. Bill Marshall, (address inaudible), President of C-Conrad Group spoke in support and
summarized their partnership with Phoenix House and introduced his staff including
Cynthia Marshall and Mary Ornellas.
Commissioner Manlapaz commented he had toured the Monrovia facility, thought it was
a good program, commented on the methadone clinic across the street, residences near
the facility and who is eligible for the program.
Commissioner Patel inquired about quality control for the program.
Commissioner Enciso inquired about restrictions on clients.
Chair Castro-Ramirez inquired about the programs, success rate and performance
measures.
Winnie Weschler stated there are many women who need a chance to recover, their
facilities to not impact properties and they have not received complaints, women on
payroll are referred from the State Department of Corrections, the women live there full-
time and participate in structures programs, there is staff present 24 hours a day and strict
curfews. Phoenix House has a contract with the State Department of Rehabilitation, a
budget is submitted to the State, there are twelve facilities with 450 staff.
Suzanne Osterman stated funding is provided from the State Department of corrections,
women volunteer for the program and are referred from the State, children are
reintroduced to their parents with supervised visits and she referred to the brochures.
Chair Castro-Ramirez invited the public to testify and requested that testimony be limited
to two (2) minutes each.
Shashi Hanuman, Public Counsel Law Center, P.O. Box 76900, Los Angeles, CA 90007
spoke in support as the facility provides affordable housing.
Alex Landeros, 11537 Louise, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition stating the property
was supposed to be senior housing, is in litigation and felons will be at the facility.
Aide Castro, 4357 Fernwood, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition stating the applicants
have good intentions but the facility is for senior housing, the property is in litigation,
there is a methadone clinic across the street and on-site parking is insufficient and she
opposes a zone change.
Sal Alatorre, 3185 Oakwood, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition and forwarded a letter
from the Lynwood Unified School District in opposition.
Ramon Rodriguez, 11244 Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in Oppos1l10n
identifying the methadone clinic and drug addicts steal from businesses in the area.
Margaret Araujo, 3621 Cedar Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition supporting
senior housing.
Rod White, 4608 Carlin Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition stating Lynwood
does not need any more rehabilitation facilities and supports senior housing.
Faisal Haroon, 11330 Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA is the property owner next door
speaking in opposition state he sees the activities of the methadone clinic and Phoenix
House will affect property values.
Lorene Reed, 11805 Harris Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition supporting senior
housing.
Jeanette Gutierrez, 10949 Pope Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition supporting
senior housing.
Ruby Charles, (address inaudible), of the Lynwood Adult School spoke in opposition
stating the facility would impact schools and children.
Hilario Rodriguez, (address inaudible), spoke in opposition too close to schools.
Olga Real, ?? Pope Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition
Commissioner West arrived at 7:57 p.m.
Carmen Sanchez 11066 Pope Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition.
Marco Barrios, 11301 Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA owns business across street spoke
in opposition stating Phoenix House will scare clients away.
Martina Rodriguez, 5146 Martin Luther King Jf. Boulevard, Lynwood, CA spoke in
opposition stating wrong location for Phoenix House and the methadone clinic impacts
the area.
Gloria ?, 5227 Cortland Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition stating facility would
impact children.
Rachel Manso, 3130 Flower Street, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition.
Emelda Luna, 11256 Virginia Avenue spoke in opposition stating impact on children and
drug addicts in the area.
Rebecca Wells, 11672 Lugo Park Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke In opposition citing
problems with the methadone clinic.
Joaquin Macinas, 3107 Euclid Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in opposition.
Jim Morton, 10112 Long Beach Boulevard, Lynwood, CA submitted a letter of
opposition and stated facility would impact schools and the methadone clinic is a
problem.
Chair Castro-Ramirez invited a rebuttal.
Winnie Weschler stated she understands the stereotypes of Phoenix House, invited
residents to tour their facilities and conduct a meeting.
Dr. Marshall stated he was on the Los Angeles Narcotics Commission and has seen good
and bad facilities and Phoenix House is well run.
Chair Castro-Ramirez closed the public hearing.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated there is no zone change, the facility in
Monrovia is very similar to the Lynwood location, the tour of the Monrovia facility
demonstrated a quality facility, the methadone clinic is completely different and the
senior housing developer defaulted.
Chair Castro-Ramirez inquired who owns the property.
LRA Attorney Ron Wilson commented the LRA owns the property, the developer
defaulted, the City is paying $6,000 to $7,000 per month for a vacant property, there is
ongoing litigation and Phoenix House would provide a beneticialland use and revenue.
Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about the litigation.
Commissioner West inquired about the next court date.
LRA Attorney Wilson stated hopefully the litigation could be completed this year and he
anticipates a June trial date.
Commissioner Araujo suggested waiting for litigation outcome.
Commissioner Patel encouraged her colleagues to tour the Phoenix House as she had in
Monrovia.
Commissioner Manlapaz encouraged his clients to tour the Phoenix House as he had in
Monrovia.
Chair Castro-Ramirez stated she understands the communities concerns, she has three
children, women need help and opportunities, commended the three Commissioners who
visited the facility and encouraged other Commissioners to attend, requested Phoenix
House to conduct a workshop to address residents and school district and requested
continuing the item for 30 days.
Commissioner West concurred with a community meeting.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated he would work with LRA staff and
Phoenix House to arrange tours and community meetings.
Motion by Commissioner West to continue for 30 days, seconded by Commissioner
Manlapaz.
Chair Castro-Ramirez continued the item by general consensus.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item #8: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-05 & Variance No. 2007-03
APPLICANT: Mariscos EI Paisa, Inc.
10320 Long Beach Boulevard
APN 6207-009-029
Chair Castro Ramirez announced continued public hearing agenda item #8 and requested
the staff report.
Director of Development Services Taylor presented the staff report stating the applicant
is requesting approval of an on-sale beer and wine license (Type 41) for the existing
Mariscos El Paisa Restaurant located at 10320 Long Beach Boulevard in the C-3 (Heavy
Commercial) zone. In addition, reduce the distance from an alcohol establishment to
residential zone from 100 feet to 80 feet. The restaurant totals 2,395 square feet with
1,300 square feet of covered seating and pick up area. Mr. Taylor distributed a letter
from the applicant, Manuel Simental, requesting certain conditions be deleted or
modified and he has three months to comply.
Commissioner West requested summary of the conditions.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated:
Condition #7: Delete requirement to install six foot wrought iron fence around the
perimeter of the parking lot area.
Condition #8: Defer use of a security guard to a later date.
Condition #9: Defer Los Angeles County Sheriff review of security plan.
Condition #10: Delete submittal of a security plan.
Condition #21: Delete repair of damaged sidewalk.
Condition #22: Delete installation of two street light poles.
Chair Castro-Ramirez commented that there are 23 conditions in Resolution 3169 and the
applicant is requesting waivers or deferring of a number of conditions.
Chair Castro-Ramirez opened the public hearing.
Manuel Simental, 10320 Long Beach Boulevard, Lynwood CA the property and business
owner spoke in support.
Development Services Manager Colin translated English to Spanish for Mr. Simental.
Mr. Simental apologized for missing meetings with staff, the fence condition would
isolate customers, has told patrons not to drink on-site, the light poles would cost $20,000
the sidewalk is too expensive, and cruising activities do not occur until 2:00 a.m..
Commissioner Araujo commented that cruising begins much earlier than 2:00 a.m.,
usually about 8:00 p.m.
Jesus Simental, ?? Long Beach Boulevard, runs fish store across the street spoke in
support stating the fence would be an eyesore, people drink in the area no matter what
they do and opposed security guards.
Sal Alatorre, 3185 Oakwood A venue, Lynwood; CA spoke III support stating the
applicant runs a good business and the cruising is not his fault.
Ramon Rodriguez, 11244 Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in support stating most
mariscos restaurants serve alcohol and the owner should not be penalized for cruising
activities.
Arturo Reyes, 11048 Carson Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in support stating his business
is across the street at 10229 Long Beach Boulevard stating Mr. Simental runs a good
business and cruising does not occur until after the restaurant is closed.
Alex Landeros, 11537 Louise, Lynwood, CA spoke in support stating the applicant runs a
good business and cruising is not his fault.
Margaret Araujo, 3621 Cedar Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in support stating the issues
at Mariscos EI Paisa have been addressed and State ABC issues alcohol licenses not the
City.
Chair Castro-Ramirez closed the public hearing.
------- --
Director of Development Services Taylor commented that State ABC requires City
approval prior to issuing a license, State ABC has issued a violation notice to Mariscos El
Paisa for unauthorized drinking on-site, patrons go across the street to a liquor store and
bring alcohol back to consume, the conditions are to mitigate impacts on properties in the
area, and staff supports the resolution as is and recommends the Planning Commission
not waive or defer any conditions or deny the application.
Commissioner Enciso commented on the community support, stated the applicant IS
willing to work with staff and encouraged staff to work with the applicant.
Commissioner West stated they need to be specific on the conditions and requested the
Sheriff attend.
Commissioner Araujo commented the applicant should share the cost of off-site
improvements.
Chair Castro-Ramirez commented the conditions are to protect the community and
should be maintained.
Director of Development Services Taylor suggested the Commission either deny the
application or continue for 30 days to allow the applicant to submit a security plan for
sheriff review. Mr. Taylor commented staff will work with the applicant but the
applicant must be responsible and attend meetings.
Motion by Commissioner Manlapaz to concur with staff on all conditions and continue
the item for 30 days, seconded by Commissioner Enciso.
Chair Castro-Ramirez continued the item by general consensus.
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item #9: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-07, Zone Chan2e No. 2007-01 and
Ne2ative DeclarationlInitial Study
APPLICANT: Oakwood Plaza, LLC
3211 Oakwood Avenue & 3198 Los Flores Boulevard
APN 6170-039-017, 034, 035 and 036
Chair Castro-Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #9 and requested the
staff report.
Development Services Manager Colin presented thc staff report and stated the applicant
is requesting approval to develop a mixed use commercial/residential project, four stories
in height with 15,000 square feet of commercial on the first floor, 129 parking stalls on
the first and second floors and nineteen condominiums on the third and fourth floors.
The project includes changing the zoning for two of the seven parcels from P-I (Parking)
to C-3 (Heavy Commercial) and gain approval of the environmental review. The subject
property totals 48,743 square feet in area and is located on the west side of Long Beach
Boulevard between Oakwood Avenue and Los Flores Boulevard. Mr. Taylor requested a
continuance as the applicant had concerns on some of the conditions in Resolution 3177.
Chair Castro-Ramirez opened the public hearing.
Sal Alatorre, 3185 Oakwood Avenue, Lynwood, CA supports the project but
recommends that Oakwood Avenue be widened, encouraged superior architectural design
and commented on City of South Gate mixed use.
Motion by Commissioner Patel to continue for 30 days, seconded by Chair Castro-
Ramirez.
Chair Castro-Ramirez continued the item by general consensus.
Item #10: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-08
APPLICANT: Maria Sandoval
12726 Waldorf Drive
APN 6186-022-023
Chair Castro-Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #10 and requested the
staff report.
Planning Assistant Figueredo presented the staff report and stated the applicant is
requesting approval to construct two detached residences, one-story in height, with three
attached two-car garages. The existing residence at the front of the property would
remam.
Chair Castro-Ramirez opened the public hearing.
Ricardo Flores, 8726 Cherokee Avenue, Downey, CA spoke in support stating the new
houses would match the existing houses and the roofs would all be composition asphalt.
Commissioner Enciso stated the rendering was very poor and requested a better
rendering.
Chair Castro-Ramirez requested the architect to explain the rendering.
Mr. Flores stated the project would include vinyl window trim, vinyl garage doors and
identified the colors.
Commissioner West commented the rendering was poor and suggested rock veneer on
the building facades, exterior lighting and accented doors and windows and
recommended a continuance.
Chair Castro-Ramirez suggested more detail on the rendering.
Motion by Commissioner West for an improved rendering and continue for 30 days,
seconded by Chair Castro-Ramirez.
Chair Castro-Ramirez continued the item by general consensus.
Item #12: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-10
APPLICANT: Red's Pro-Series Hydraulics
3030 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard
APN 6170-025-003
Chair Castro-Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #12 and requested the
staff report.
Development Services Manager Colin presented the staff report and stated the applicant
is requesting approval to operate an auto parts installation and sales facility within an
existing 5,400 square foot building located at 3030 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in
the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone.
Chair Castro-Ramirez opened the public hearing.
Spase Matosky, 2816 Rubidoux, Riverside, CA spoke in support stating he has owned the
business for five years relocating from Paramount. Requested the conditions to
reconstruct sidewalk and install a wheelchair ramp be deleted, the City provide trash cans
and they planted palms in the parkway that they would like to remain.
Commissioner West commented on the chain link fence on the side street, suggested
creeping fig vines on the front of the building and inquired about the Public Works
conditions.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated the applicant received a business license
for auto parts sales only and the zoning code requires a conditional use permit for auto
parts installation. Mr. Taylor stated off-site improvements are usually only required for
new buildings or additions and the business is within an existing building, suggested
deleting. Persons must obtain a permit to plant or alter the parkway and staff can check
with Public Works about keeping the palm trees.
Margaret Araujo, 3621 Cedar Avenue, Lynwood, CA spoke in support and requested the
palm trees remain.
Chair Castro-Ramirez closed the public hearing.
Motion by Commissioner Araujo to adopt Resolution 3182 as amended by deleting
conditions 19 and 20 and modifying condition 21, seconded by Commissioner Patel.
Chair Castro-Ramirez requested roll call.
Director of Development Services Taylor called roll and the motion to approve passed 6-
O. Mr. Taylor confirmed the following amendments:
Delete Condition #19 requiring sidewalk replacement.
Delete Condition #20 requiring installation of a wheelchair ramp.
Modify Condition #21 to read "Subject to Public Works review and recommendation,
remove exiting palm trees along Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Capistrano
Avenue.
A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF L YNWOOD ADOPTING CERTAIN
FINDINGS RELATED TO, AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2007-10, TO OPERATE A RETAIL BUSINESS SELLING AUTO PARTS
AND INSTALLING SUCH AUTO PARTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3030
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD IN THE C-3 (HEAVY
COMMERCIAL) ZONE, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL
NUMBER 6170-025-003, CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA (AMENDED BY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 8,
2007)
ROLL CALL
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ARAUJO, CASTRO-RAMIREZ, ENCISO, MANLAPAZ, PATEL &
WEST
NONE
YOUNGER
NONE
AYES:
CONTINUED REGULAR AGENDA
Item #13: General Plan Amendment 2007-01-Update HousiDl! Element
APPLICANT: City of Lynwood
Chair Castro-Ramirez announced continued regular agenda item #13 and requested a
staff report.
Director of Development Services Taylor stated the item is again on the agenda to
provide the Planning Commission and the public an opportunity to review and comment
on the draft update to the Lynwood Housing Element. Mr. Taylor stated pursuant to
Planning Commission direction, staff forwarded their request to the City Council to
conduct a Special Planning Commission meeting. The City Council directed staff to
conduct the meeting on Saturday, June 2, 2007.
Chair Castro-Ramirez supported the June 2, 2007 Special Meeting and requested staff to
provide more detail on low and moderate income housing and identify State Department
of Finance statistics.
Chair Castro-Ramirez invited public comment.
Shashi Hanuman, Public Counsel Law Offices, P.O. Box 76900, Los Angeles, CA 90007
commented on the Housing Element providing suggestions on public workshop format
and content, identified Draft Housing Element inaccuracies in Appendix B regarding
units built and vacant parcels and supported the special meeting.
Rebecca Thornton, Law Offices of Rebecca Thornton, 429 Santa Monica Boulevard,
#550, Santa Monica, CA encouraged public participation, supported the special meeting,
recommended public surveys, advisory committees and affordable housing.
Chair Castro-Ramirez requested staff to review the comments.
Commissioner Araujo inquired to Ms. Hanuman and Ms. Thornton their motives
regarding the Housing Element Update.
City Attorney Beltran commented that the Planning Commission must comply with State
Law, what motivates the public to participate is irrelevant and the handout should be part
of the Planning Commission minutes.
Chair Castro-Ramirez encouraged staff to inquire what other cities have done, involve
students, review the Housing Element annually and document public participation.
Motion by Commissioner Manlapaz to continue the item, seconded by Commissioner
West.
Chair Castro-Ramirez continued the item by general consensus.
NEW REGULAR AGENDA
Item #14: Extension of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2004-03 (26626)
APPLICANT: Plaza Mexico
3100 Imperial Highway
Chair Castro-Ramirez announced new regular agenda item #14 and requested the staff
report.
COI:nmissioner Enciso excused himself for a potential conflict of interest.
Director of Development Services Taylor presented the staff report and stated the parcel
map approved for Plaza Mexico May II, 2004 consolidates multiple lots into six parcels
and will expire May II, 2007 pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act. Staff is
requesting a continuance for six months to file the Final Map.
.
Motion by Commissioner Araujo to grant a six (6) month extension, seconded by
Commissioner Manlapaz.
Chair Castro-Ramirez requested roll call.
Director of Development Services Taylor called roll and the motion to approve passed 5-
0-I with Commissioner Enciso abstaining.
COMMISSION ORALS
Commissioner Enciso inquired about the housing element attorneys accusing the City of
not complying with State Law.
City Attorney Beltran commented the City is complying.
Chair Castro-Ramirez thanked her colleagues and staff.
STAFF ORALS
NONE
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner West to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Patel. Chair
Castro Ramirez adjourned the meeting at 11 :53 pm.
LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
11321 Bullis Road . Lynwood, California 90262 . (310) 886-1600
* *
~..~
P /q ,."".... (<!J ....- r.O ,'6-1..
?/f/~7
May 5, 2007
Grant Taylor, Director Developmental Services
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Reference:
Lynwood Planning Commission Meeting
May 8, 2007
Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-09
Phoenix House & C-Conrad Group Ltd.
Dear. Mr. Taylor,
The Board of Education has become aware of the above-referenced New Public Hearing item.
Previously, our Board of Education President publicly spoke against approval of a Transitional
Housing Facility at 11300 Atlantic Avenue.. Formal opposition was raised with the Lynwood City
Council. Reasons for opposition included the proximity to Lynwood Community Adult School,
located at 112n Atlantic Avenue, and Will Rogers Elementary School, located at 11220
Duncan Avenue.
The presence of a drug rehabilitation/mental health screening facility to these schools warrants
that the District again voice formal opposition. The health and safety of school age children is of
utmost concern to the District's governing board. Adults attending the Adult School also need
safe passage and an environment free from risk.
The District respectfully requests that the Commission be made aware of our opposition to this
project, and votes to deny the presence of such a disruptive activity in the City of Lynwood.
~)
. .
. .
---- /'
- -_..
I, Superintendent of Schools
cc: .Board of Education
Lourdes Castro-Ramirez, Chair of Planning Commission
BOA ROO FED U C A" TON
Mr. Jose Luis Solache Mrs. Guadalupe R. Rodriguez Mr. Alfonso Morales Mrs. Rachel Chavez. Mrs. Marla G. Lopez
President Vice President Clerk Member Member
Dr. Dhyan Lal
Superintendent and Secretary 10 the Board
Jim Morton
P.O. Box 775
Lynwood , Ca. 90262
May 8, 2007
1\ Hi,: L-H(J -\-J ,_
u o~r.("
fk~"7~(L>1
TO : Honorable Chairman & Planning Commissioners
Drugs are the worst plague world wide, and have brought misery to many families
and extended families worldwide. Just about everyone you speak to has been affected by
drugs in some form or another.
Elected officials and appointed commissioners, first responsibility is to the
families ofLynwood.
Phoenix House is a housing facility for substance abuse, with fourteen units and
one manager residence, the facility can house between forty to sixty women. Phoenix
House presently cannot control the environment outside the property line, and
unfortunately children pass by every day to and from school. Elementary schools such
as Will Rogers at 1220 Duncan Ave, and Washington at 4225 Sanborn are just blocks
away. This concerns the community and we are sure you would want the same safe
environment in your own residential neighborhoods.
A methadone clinic at 11315 Atlantic Ave. is located across the street from
Phoenix House at 11300 Atlantic Ave. the facility received a conditional approval in a
resolution on the basis that there would be no impact on the community. Families and
businesses protested, but officials gave them the permit. Ever since the opening of the
clinic the families and businesses in the area have been exposed to alleged drug dealers,
shoplifting, and vagrancy. The misery they live with is due to the misguided decision of
city officials and should never be repeated.
Phoenix House is a good program, but not in a residential or business
community surrounded by schools.! ask you to stand with your Lynwood families and
business community and vote NO.
Sincerely,
frn--.
Jim Morton
MARISCOS EL PAISA
10320 LONG BEACH BLVD., LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
TEL: (213) 563-1047
May 7, 2007
DLf-t-r.L-.\-~ fc>
f IG""> D"",.:y/,.~
!: / riD!
Planning COll!mission, City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Rd
Lynwood, CA 90262
Honorable Commissioners:
In reviewing all of the conditions required by you on my application for a beer license at
my restaurant located at 10320 Long Beach Blvd, I find that the cost to implement the
required conditions is high and since business is slow, it would put my business finances
at risk.
Please allow me to get the license; security cameras and alarms are already in place, the
hiring of security guards and a good sheriff approved security plan would be
__ implemented as soon as possible. The conditions that LaITl opposing are those where _.
fences and other capital improvements are concerned; they are extremely expensive and
would not help in the overall business operation.
I have been a good business in the City of Lynwood and as such I am requesting the
opportunity to ofter an additional service at my business and at the same time put an end
to our collective problems.
Should you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Testimony to Lynwood Ptanning Commission
May 8, 2007
r'Publicl~<lIIB""... ..
~unse . '.........
LAW
C E N T E R
Shashi Hanuman, Public Counsel
Rebecca Thornton, Law Offices of Rebecca Thornton
On behalf of the residents of the Carlin Avenue Village Mobilehome Park and ACORN, we submit
comments on the draft housing element presented for consideration to the Lynwood Planning Commission
today. As Planning Commissioners, it is your duty to ensure that the document you adopt as your housing
element (HE) is both accurate and complies with the requirements of the law. The HE requires actual public
participation in the "development" of the housing element. Here, no such participation has been had, and one
public workshop is nowhere near sufficient to accomplish real public input. The reviewing agency places a
high priority on actual public participation as required by law. Again, while we applaud Staff for making
efforts to adopt a valid housing element, we also request that you, as Commissioners, do this in accordance with
the requirements of the law for actual public participation. Our comments alone are insufficient, as we
represent only a few of the residents of the Lynwood.
o First, we direct your attention to the following inaccuracies in the draft HE, and ask that you direct Staff to
explain and correct them:
a) Duplicate Units List: Duplicate units listed in the Summary of Units Built (Appendix B):
Pages B-ii through B-vi are the same exact pages and list the same units as pages B-vii through
B-x - thus 120 to 140 units have been overstated.
b) Inconsistent Data with Respect to Units Built During Planning Period: Staff should explain
why other data sources, including Construction Industry Research Board data, show that
Lynwood has built only halfofthe 595 units it claims to have built during the planning period.
c) \nconsistent Data with Respect to Potential to Build on Vacant Parcels: Staff should explain
why the Environmental Report lists that vacant parcels can accommodate 60 units (See ErR,
page 10), while the draft HE lists that vacant parcels can accommodate 104 units. (See draft HE,
TableA-3).
6 Second, we remind you that while you have directed Staff to take our comments of April I 0, 2007 into
account, our review shows that no changes have been made to the draft HE to reflect our comments.
~ Third, in light of the above, we request that you make the following specific directives to Staff:
1. Revise the draft HE to correct the above deficiencies before another public meeting is held on
this;
11. Revise the draft HE to reflect our prior comments in the letter dated April 10, 2007 and
incorporated herein by reference;
iii. Hold numerous workshops and study sessions, with adequate notice through print, radio and
Spanish newspapers, to solicit actual input from citizens on the needs of this community.'
IV. Conduct needs surveys of citizens to accurately depict the housing needs of the community as
required by the draft HE.
v. Take note of citizen input at workshops and study sessions, and use that input in development of
the draft HE; and
VI. Require staffto present a revised housing element to the Planning Commission onlv after all
public workshops have been completed and comments taken into account.
1 Examples of adequate public processes in other cities attached hereto. Other cities have used a variety of
methods to get citizen input, including radio, print, television and direct mailing, to ensure actual
participation.
~_F' I
Examples of Adequate Public Processes in Adoption of
Housing Element
Plan Preparation (Los Angeles)
On January 17, 1996 a diverse group of non-profit and for-profit housing organizations met
with the City departments dealing with housing matters to layout the issues to be addressed in
this Housing Element revision. Subsequently, a Technical Advisory Committee (T AC) was
formed from this group to assist the Planning Department in the preparation of this plan. This
group had over 20 persons present at its first meeting. This T AC included representatives from
the Housing Department, the Housing Authority, the CRA, non-profit developers, lenders,
elected officials, homeowners' associations and others. This committee identified significant
housing issues and proposed goals, objectives, and policies to address housing needs in the
City. It met at least nine times from February 14,1996 through December 9,1996 plus the
members communicated by email, phone and fax to work out the proposals for this element.
Plan Review
After the plan was prepared for the proposals from the T AC the Planning Department sought
review and input from a diverse cross section of the community.
Work Shops
A number of public workshops were held in various communities of the City to encourage
input. Copies of the draft plan were mailed out with the invitations to the workshops so all
parties could review the plan. Workshops were held on the following locations.
December 20, 1997
Peck Park Community Center, San Pedro
January 10, 1998
Canoga Park Senior Citizen Center, Canoga Park
January 17, 1998
Watts Senior Citizen Center, Watts
January 24,1998
Westminster Senior Citizen Center, Venice
January 31,1998
Sun Valley Recreation Center, Sun Valley
Diversity
The invitations for these workshops went to a broad cross section of the local population in an
effort to reach persons of various languages, cultures, abilities and Olientations. For example,
notices were scnt to the English language and non-English press and broadcast media serving
the African-American, Chinese, Japanese, Jewish, Philippine, Korean, and Spanish
communities.
Print Media
Invitations were sent to over twenty diverse print media sources including La Opinion, Chinese
Daily News, The-Sentinel, International Daily News, La Voz Libre, Life Philippines USA
Today, LA Japanese Daily News, the Korean Times, Watts Times and the newspapers at USC,
UCLA, and LMU.
Broadcast Media
The broadcast media were also notified and invited to make public service announcements to
their constituencies. Over 30 diverse broadcast media sources were notified including KWKW,
KLCS, KNBC, KPFK, KRLA, KXEZ, KMEX, KVEA, KWHY, KLON, KNX, KQLZ and
KXLU.
Internet and Cable T.V.
The Planning Department also posted notice on our Internet site and on channel 35 on local
cable T.V.
Advocacy Groups
Representatives of the housing advocacy groups were also invited to review and comment on
the plan. Some of those invited include Mental Health Advocacy Services, Low Income
Housing Fund, Ecohome, Sober Living Network, Legal Aid Foundation and Western Center on
Law and Poverty.
Environmental Clearance Review
In addition to participating in the plan preparation, the public was able to review the
environmental clearance. Notice of the environmental clearance was published in the L.A.
Times on October 15, 1998 and the public was able to review and challenge the environmental
clearance for 30 days after that date. In addition, the Environmental Clearance accompanied the
Draft Housing Element at each stage of the plan review. Public Hearings and Review by
Decision Makers Based on the input from the public workshops the proposed Housing Element
was prepared and sent to the following decision making bodies of L.A. for further review,
public hearings and approval.
Planning Commission
The Commission reviewed the plan at three public meetings on November 19, 1998, March 11,
1999, and on January 31, 2000 and held public hearings each time to gather input on the plan.
Prior to the initial City Planning Commission hearing over 750 notices were sent out to anyone
that responded to the notices for the earlier public workshops plus other individuals, public
interest groups, homeowners' associations, City depaltments and various related agencies.
Planning & Land Use Committee (PLUM)
The PLUM Committee held hearings on the plan on September 12, 2000. Prior to their initial
hearing, they sent out over 700 notices. For their subsequent hearings, they notified anyone that
had responded in some way to the original notices.
City Council
After the PLUM Committee completes its public hearings and review of the plan, the full
Council will take up the matter. They will send out notices inviting public participation and
input. They will hold a full public hearing just as the Commission and PLUM Committee have
done and then consider the plan. Public Review of lndividual Plan Programs Each of the
programs in the Element is subject to review and approval of one or more City or government
agency. Each agency has their own due process rules but all must meet state and federal
constitutional due process requirements. At a minimum these include open meetings and
posting of notices subject to the Brown Act. For the programs in the plan there have been or
will be many opportunities in this process for public input as the implementing agencies process
the programs.
Public Participation (Lonl! Beach)
Opportunities for residents to identify community housing needs, recommend strategies, and
comment on the City's Housing Element are integral to a successful element. Participation
was solicited through the local newspaper, flyers distributed by the City's six Community
Planners at meetings with local community groups, and through regular updates and po stings
on the City's web site. Furthermore, 152 neighborhood and citywide organizations were
direct mailed notices regarding the workshops. Therefore, significant public noticing was
accomplished for the Housing Element.
Numerous groups representing the community participated in various aspects of updating the
2000-2005 Housing Element at the community workshops. A sample of participating groups
include the following: Carmelitos (Public Housing) Tenants Association, Long Beach Central
Area Association, Empower Long Beach Coordinating Council, Central Long Beach Business
Association, Long Beach Area Coalition for the Homeless, Disabled Resource Center, Long
Beach Affordable Housing Coalition, Foundation for Independent Living, National
Association for the Mentally Ill, and the Legal Aid Foundation to mention a few.
DUling the Needs Assessment phase, two rounds of community workshops were conducted
during the meetings, and to neighborhood organizations. Approximately 350 surveys were
completed. This community input has been reflected in the Element's policies and programs.
A summary of each community meeting is contained in Appendix B and a detailed tabulation
of the Needs Survey is available at City Hall in the Advanced Planning Division (5th Floor).
Upon completion of the draft 2000-2005 Housing Element, the Planning Commission,
Housing AuthOlity, Housing Development Company, Redevelopment Agency, Disability
Commission, and City CouncWconducted study sessions.
Participants at the prior community meetings were notified of each meeting. The Draft Element
was.~~ubrriit(eQ to the Department of Housing and Community Development for comment.
After HCD reviewed the draft Housing Element, public hearings were held before the
Planning Commission and the City Council.