Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2007-10-09 PLANNING COMMISSIONCity of ~1'~~®®~ R4L-.RMFRICR CITY L~ City ~ldeeting C{,aQQenges (o O D D ) 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (310) 6030220 AGES®A LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING; CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CA 90262 October 09, 2007 6:30 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Lourdes Castro-Ramirez Chair ' Daa~z..~- RE~ 9VEd7 CBTY OF LYNWDOD CiTYC€.FRs'S nr_rtrF acr T~ge~ 20~~ 7 S~g~~'„~1~114.~}~3k4fJ~rJ Kenneth West Rita Patel Vice Chair Commissioner Juan Enciso Dr. Carlos Manlapaz Bill Younger Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner COMMISSION COUNSEL Law Office of Ronald Wilson STAFF Jonathan Colin; Gabriel Elliott, Dev. Services Manager Interim Director Kimberly Gonzalez, Administrative Analyst I Karen Figueredo, Planning Assistant i OPENING CEREi~ONIES 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Flag Salute. 3. Roll call of Commissioners. 4. Certification of Agenda Posting. 5. Minutes of Planning Commission Meetings: September ii, 2007 SWEARING IN SPEAKERS 6. The Lynwood Planning Commission shall swear in all persons wishing to testify on any item listed on the Planning Commission Agenda. Residents shall swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. PUBLIC ORALS 7. At this time, any member of the public may comment on any issue within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission that is not on the Agenda. Members of the public may also comment at this time on any Agenda Item that is not scheduled for a public hearing. To preserve continuity, the Planning Commission Chair may, at his/her discretion, request members of the public wishing to comment on Agenda Items for which public hearings are not scheduled to hold their comments until just prior to the Commission's discussion of the Agenda Item in question. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-14 Tentative Tract Man 2007-03 (69283) Variance No. 2007-05 APPLICANT: Alan Ream 11339-11341 Louise Avenue APN 6194-023-043 Proposal Request to convert fourteen (14) existing apartments into residential condominiums, subdivide airspace on one lot for condominiums, variance to reduce parking from required minimum of 32 stalls to 26 stalls. 2 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission withdraw the decision to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-14 to convert fourteen (14) existing condominiums into twelve (12) residential condominiums, and continue the item to the Planning Commission meeting of November 13, 2007. 9. Brown Act and Robert's Rules of Order APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Proposal Legal Counsel brief presentation on summary of Brown Act. Legal Counsel brief presentation on motions types under Robert's Rules of Order. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file. CONTINUED REGULAR AGENDA None NEW REGULAR AGENDA None COMMISSION ORALS STAFF ORALS Update on the Pacer International project. Update of Mariscos EI Paisa. ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Lynwood Planning Commission on October 09, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California, 90262. 3 AGENDA ITEM # 5 MINUTES: 09-11-200; LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. September 11, 2007 The Lynwood Planning Commission met in regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers. Chair Castro-Ramirez called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. Commissioner West led the flag salute. Chair Castro-Ramirez requested the roll call. Development Services Manager Colin called roll. Chair Castro-Ramirez presiding. Commissioners Patel, Younger, West and Enciso answered the roll call. Commissioner Manlapaz was excused. Also present were Agency Counsel Maurice Chenier, Public Works/Engineering Manager Wang, Development Services Manager Jonathan Colin, and Planning Assistant Karen Figueredo. Chair Castro-Ramirez inquired if the agenda had been duly posted. Development Services Manager Colin stated the agenda had been duly posted in accordance with the Brown Act a minimum of seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting. Item #5: MINUTES -August 14, 2007 Vice Chair Castro-Ramirez announced agenda Item #5, Minutes of the August 14, 2007 Planning Commission meeting and asked if there were any questions or corrections. Motion by Commissioner Enciso to approve the August 14, 2007 Minutes, seconded by Commissioner Younger. Chair Castro Ramirez requested roll call. Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve minutes passed 5-0. Item #6: Swearin4 In Speakers Chair Castro-Ramirez requested Counsel Cheneir to swear in citizens wishing to speak on any agenda item. Counsel Cheneir duly swore in all speakers. Item #7: Public Orals Chair Castro-Ramirez announced the item and stated any citizen wishing to testify on any issue under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission may speak now. Vice Chair West asked to do the dedication for former Planning Commissioner Araujo. Chair Castro-Ramirez proceeded to honor and dedicate the meeting in honor of former Planning Commissioner Araujo. Chair, Vice Chair, Commissioners and staff presented their respects with a minute of silence in his memory. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked if any of the commissioners would like to go to present the plaque to former Planning Commissioner Araujo's family after the meeting. Nobody spoke during public orals. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS Item #9: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-14 Tentative Tract Man 2007-03 (69283) & Variance No. 2007-05 APPLICANT: Alan Ream 11339-11341 Louise Avenue APN 6194-023-043 Chair Castro-Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #9 and requested the staff report. Planning Assistant Figueredo presented the staff report and stated the applicant is requesting approval to convert fourteen (14) existing apartments into residential condominiums. The residences consist of six (6) buildings, two stories in height with attached one and two-car garages. The subject property is located at 11339-11341 Louise Avenue, in the R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) zone. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission select one of the three following options: 1. Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-14 to convert fourteen (14) residential apartments into fourteen (14) residential condominiums. 2. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-14 to convert fourteen (14) existing apartments into twelve (12) residential condominiums. 3. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-14 to convert fourteen (14) existing residential apartments into fourteen (14) residential condominiums subject to meeting prevailing parking requirements at the time of map recordation. Development Services Manager Colin added that the recommendation was made by the Development Services Interim Director Elliott to choose an option instead of having too many resolutions in the table because it could get confusing. After the decision is made the resolution will be presented at the next Planning Commission meeting. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked what the next step is. Development Service Manager Colin explained that after choosing one of the options the resolutions shall be adopted at the next Planning Commission meeting and the conditions can be reviewed, corrected or if the commissioners wished could also add more conditions. Counsel Cheneir also explained that it would ratify any decision the Planning Commission made and the procedure was not uncommon practice, it is done at the City Council level. Vice-Chair West asked if they can go to close session. Counsel Cheneir replied it does not meet any criteria to be able to take it to close session. Vice-Chair West asked what are the criteria the project needs to meet. Counsel Cheneir inaudible. Chair Castro-Ramirez opened the public hearing. Applicant Chris Christenson 4817 Palm Av La Mesa, requested to the Planning Commission to approve the Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Tract Map and the Variance. The applicant said there is no existing on site parking impact issue. It will remain as 14 dwelling units with 30 parking spaces. Denying the project will be denying the community of 14 additional home ownership units. Applicant Christensen also asked why not the variance and the tentative tract map have not been considered at the meeting. Commissioner Younger asked what the applicant expects from the Planning Commission if they approved his proposal of fourteen units without meeting the parking requirements. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked about the number of bedrooms. Applicant Christensen responded that here were four three-bedroom units and ten two-bedroom units. It was proposed two 2-bedroom units to be combined into two large three bedroom units by eliminating a wall. Those units would have extremely large bedrooms, two front doors, and two kitchens which seem impractical and does not make sense. Chair Castro-Ramirez explained parking is a big issue in the city because there is not enough space on the street and it's been a big issue and that is why the code was modified. Home ownership is important but the Planning Commission wants to make sure is quality home ownership without overcrowding conditions. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked if he will accept the alternative of reducing the units from fourteen to twelve or thirteen. Applicant Christensen replied the best option that suit their needs would be option " 3A" the granting of the variance or option three which require to meet the parking requirements at the time of the tentative tract map is approved. The request for a variance is substantiated by the fact that the project does not have a major parking impact. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked how many parking spaces are been provided based on the proposal; he stated there is discrepancy between thirty and twenty eight. Applicant Christensen replied there will be 26 covered parking spaces. The garages are a combination of garages and carports. The project is also proposing four additional parking spaces which currently are open spaces for a total of thirty parking spaces. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked if each of these condominiums has one to one garage ratio. Applicant Christensen confirms the ratio is one to one. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked if they have a picture of the carports Applicant Christensen did not have pictures. Chair Castro Ramirez asked if the applicant had sold any projects where the condominiums do not have covered garages. Applicant Christensen replied that some of his projects do not even have parking spaces but in most cases projects have open spaces; but it is usually closed to TOD or projects closed to major mass transit. Commissioner Younger asked if the Planning Commission approved the fourteen units without sufficient parking somebody will be lacking, how would he address that. Applicant Christensen replied that if they had not brought the application forward there will still be a lack of parking and "what is there is there" and there should be no changes for the project, since there is not a parking impact. As it is if the planning commission desires to add conditions that the existing carports to be enclosed would be upon the developer to put garage doors and other of the options would be to make the open spaces covered spaces as well. The idea of having carports would help the issue of having the garages used as storages. Commissioner Younger explained that the issue is ownership against rental and it does make a difference as to whether the property owner has a garage if he owns the unit as opposed to renting the unit. Applicant Christensen agreed and knows that different cities have different requirements. Vice Chair West said that since there are going to be condominiums it should be specified in the agreement to not use the garages as storages. Applicant Christensen agreed and it will be included in the CC&R's and we will submit a copy of it to the City Attorney for review. Commissioner Enciso explained that the planning commissioners were not trying to give him a hard time but the city has a problem with parking and asked the applicant to understand the importance of parking. Applicant Christensen gave examples of how the project can restrict the number of cars, RVs or boats on site by CC&R but agrees it is impractical to not provide enough parking. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked which population they are targeting to market the condominiums and the price range of the units. Applicant Christensen replied the existing tenants have the first right of refusal to purchase the units and he hoped to see people from the community. Price has not been set and on the ladder to home ownership condominium conversions is the most affordable for sale product on the market. The prices would be what the market would bear and the applicant can not really say but he would guess that a two bedroom condominium would go for $200,000 to $300,000 truly a guess and it is illegal until the Planning Commission approves the project to even begin to speculate or advertise the price. Chair Castro-Ramirez explained that the actual market crisis has projects facing hard times to get funding or selling the properties and asked how this is going to affect the condo conversion project. Applicant Christensen replied that the property owner bought the property with plans of converting the units to condominiums not to keep it as rental units. Condo conversion is one of the most affordable home ownership methods in the market and a stable opportunity buying a $250,000 to $300,000 home with $2,000 a month payment compared to a $700,000 home with $5,000 a month payment gives the working class family the opportunity to own a home. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked if anybody wants to speak in favor. Ted Chan property owner, 2136 Harry Lane in Anaheim explained that he bought the property a couple years ago and he has a good relationship with his tenants. One of the tenants told him he would like to buy the condominium because they like the community and another told him they are saving up for the down payment. The property owner said he had a positive response from the tenants. He also explained that there are some apartment complexes around his property and single family homes and it is not high density. Chair Castro Ramirez asked if anybody wanted to speak against the project. None. Chair Castro-Ramirez closed the public orals. Vice Chair West asked Development Services Manager Colin if there were going to be any types of impacts in the converting of the garages in regards to code requirements. Development Services Manager Colin explained that the applicant is proposing 26 enclosed parking stalls; there are ten one-car garages and eight enclosed carports. Development Services Manager gave a brief background history on the City's parking requirements: September 2003 was the first time the issue was addressed by the Planning Commission to increase the parking requirements. In 2005 more changes were made including that a three bedroom residence shall provide atwo-car garage and a four bedroom residence shall provide athree-car garage. Carports could be built in addition to the garage but not to replace a garage. Development Services Manager Colin also explained the City of Lynwood is working on an ordinance to prohibit overnight parking. The Site Plan Review, Design Review Board and Planning Commission also denied parking in the front setback (parking pads). The parking the applicant is referring to the street can not be counted towards required parking and parking requirements may get more restrictive. Vice-Chair West indicated that even with converting the carports to garages the project will not meet parking requirements; he also pointed out the carport dimensions. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked how the proposal of reducing units will work. Development Services Manager Colin replied if the applicant converts 14 units into 12 units the required parking will be 30, 24 enclosed and 6 guests parking stalls, that way the applicant will meet the parking requirements. Development Services Manager Colin told the Planning Commission that staff feels that option number two will be the best selection. Vice Chair West asked if staff could explain the breakdown on the parking requirements. Chair Castro Ramirez asked if the applicant can combine two 2-bedrooms into two 4-bedrooms. Planning Assistant Figueredo replied it will be a bigger unit with three bedrooms; it will meet the parking requirements. Vice-Chair West asked how many bedrooms will be converted to four bedrooms. Development Services Manager Colin replied all the units are going to be three bedrooms. Inaudible. Vice-Chair West asked if the third option is approved does it need to be approved by the Planning Commission if the parking requirements are met. Development Services Manager Colin replied he does not believe the conditions will become more flexible Vice-Chair West asked if the garages are part of the documentation of ownership. Development Services Manager Colin replied it will be part of the ownership; it is part of the requirement. Counsel Cheneir agreed. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked if the CC&Rs will spell out the City requirements. Development Services Manager Colin explained that the CC&Rs is going to be reviewed by staff and it will include resolutions with conditions. Chair Castro Ramirez summarized the options given by staff and asked if there was a motion. Development Services Manager Colin explained the option the Planning Commission will be choosing was to give staff direction to proceed with the resolutions. Motion by Vice-Chair West to convert 14 existing apartments into 12 residential condominiums, seconded by Commissioner Patel Chair Castro-Ramirez requested roll call. Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve option B passed 5-0 with Commissioner Malapaz absent. Castro Ramirez- Approved West- Approved Araujo- Enciso- Approved Manlapaz- Absent Patel- Approved Younger- Approved OPTION B: APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-14 TO CONVERT FOURTEEN (14) EXISTING CONDOMINIUMS INTO TWELVE (12) RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS. ROLL CALL AYES: WEST, ENCISO, YOUNGER, PATEL & CASTRO RAMIREZ NOES: ABSENT: MANLAPAZ ABSTAIN: Item #10 Brown Act and Robert's Rules of Order APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Chair Castro-Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #10 and requested the staff report. Development Services Manager Colin requested to continue the item to the next regular meeting on October 09, 2007. Counsel Cheneir apologized. Chair Castro-Ramirez continued the item. CONTINUED REGULAR AGENDA None NEW REGULAR AGENDA NONE STAFF ORALS Counsel Cheneir reported the Housing Element litigation was denied; the court found the Housing Element as written complies with the law. Development Services Manager Colin said the City is waiting on the comments from the State regarding the Housing Element. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked for the reports regarding Mariscos EI Paisa .and Fernwood Estates. Development Services Manager Colin gave a report regarding Mariscos EI Paisa, there were some changes on the City and Sheriff's Department and they asked fora 30 day extension which was granted. The fence is already built, Fire Department comments were positive and the applicant is working on Public Works conditions. Vice-Chair West asked if the light poles are going to be moved. Development Services Manager Colin replied he believed that was the case and it was a minor change. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked if the applicant already applied for a liquor license. Development Services Manager Colin said they did apply for a liquor license but the State has not sent any information back. Development Services Manager Colin presented a status regarding Fernwood Estates. The property owner Mr Franco requested to do the construction in phases. Public Works department is waiting for a bond to be submitted in lieu on some off-site improvements and the applicant needs to comply with some improvements prior to the Tentative Tract map recordation. There was an extension granted for the Tentative Tract Map; meetings were conducted for the review of the tract map, fees have expired and need to be paid; building permits, impact fees, art fees, etc. Chair Castro-Ramirez commented on the area being blighted and even squatters are living in those units. Commissioner Enciso asked if the City can ask for maintenance and fence the property to keep it clean. Commissioner Enciso also commented on complaints he is receiving regarding Pacer's block wall. Development Services Manager Colin explained the block wall was going to be placed over utilities and they choose another alternative to screen the view, Public Works Director Dan Ojeda and Interim Director of Development Service Gabriel Elliott had done some inspections and are working with Pacer to solve the problem. Chair Castro Ramirez asked for a report for next meeting. Commissioner Enciso said around two weeks ago trailers were parked along the residences side. Vice Chair West explained there was construction going on at the time and that is why the trailers were parked. Development Services Manager Colin said he would send staff to do noise readings. COMMISSION ORALS Commissioner Enciso asked if the City can set up a parking standards procedure for new developments and conversions before the project is presented to the Planning Commission with insufficient parking. Chair Castro-Ramirez clarified that any applicant has an opportunity to appeal to the Planning Commission, and to request a variance, and that it is up to the discretion of the Planning Commission to approve or deny the request. Development Services Manager Colin explained the condo conversion project went through a 48 hours review, the documents specified the project was short on parking and a variance will not be granted. The applicant has the right to appeal. Commissioner Patel asked if the Planning Commissioners can get more training. Developer Services Manager Colin said the housing market is slowing down and we can use the time to do some presentations, and have some department head presentation and training until business goes back to normal. Chair Castro-Ramirez agreed if the Planning Commission does not have enough items to utilize the time productively, also asked for information on conferences and classes. Chair Castro Ramirez asked if Caltrans or the City of Lynwood keep the maintenance of the freeway off ramps, because she had observed trash and transients living around it. She requested if a representative would be able to attend a meeting. Inaudible. Vice-Chair West asked for the Pine report and if the project was signed off. Development Services Manager Colin replied the case was refered to Code Enforcement. Vice-Chair West also asked the transients living around the freeway off ramps. Public Works/Engineering Manager Wang replied it was Caltrans property. Chair Castro-Ramirez asked why Interim Director Gabriel Elliott was absent. Development Services Manager Colin said he called in the afternoon letting staff know he was sick. Chair Castro-Ramirez indicated that it was unusual that a Director missed a meeting. Counsel Cheneir said he will miss Commissioner Araujo. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Younger, and second by Commissioner Enciso. The meeting was adjourned at 8:05pm. Lourdes Castro-Ramirez, Chairman Lynwood Planning Commission APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Gabriel Elliot Interim Development Services Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ron Wilson, Agency Counsel Planning Commission Counsel AGENDA ITEM # 8 CUP NO. 2007-14 TTM NO. 2007-08 (69283) VAR NO. 2007-05 DATE: October 9, 2007 TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Gabriel Elliott, Interim Development Service Director BY: Karen Figueredo, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL PERMIT No 2007-14, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2007-03 (69283) & VARIANCE NO. 2007-05 11339-11341 Louise Avenue Assessor Parcel Number 6194-023-043 APPLICANT: Alan Ream PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting approval to convert fourteen (14) existing apartments into residential condominiums. The residences consist of six (6) buildings, two stories in height with attached one and two-car garages. The subject property is located at 11339-11341 Louise Avenue, Assessor Parcel Number 6194-023-043, in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone. PLANNIING COMMISSION ACTION OF SEPTEMBER il. 2007 At the Planning Commission meeting of September 11, 2007, the Commission selected the option to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-14 to convert fourteen (14) existing condominiums into twelve (12) residential condominiums. This option was one of the three staff had presented to the Commission and there were no Resolutions adopted because of the inability to predict Planning Commission's action. SITE PLAN REVIEW MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2007 At the Site Plan Review meeting of September 26, 2007, there was discussion between staff and the applicant on a proposal to further refine the project. This proposal would only result in the loss of one apartment unit (resulting in 13 condominium units). Both the applicant and staff need some time to follow up on this proposal to make sure that it minimizes the loss of units while providing the required number of parking spaces on site. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13. 2007 At the Planning Commission meeting of November 13, 2007, staff will introduce a resolution to approve CUP No. 2007-14 to convert 14 existing apartment units into 13 condominium units; approve Tentative Tract Map No, 2007-03 subject to conditions, and deny Variance No, 2007-05 since parking requirements will be met on site. PROJECT OVERVIEW The subject property totals 25,929 square feet (0.59-acres) in area and is located on the west side of Louise Avenue between Sanborn Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. The site plan indicates the property is rectangular in shape totaling 25,929 square feet with the driveway providing a minimum of twenty five feet (25') for the existing apartments. Per section 25.65.060 of the Lynwood Municipal Code, each residence consisting of three or fewer bedrooms shall provide atwo-car garage and residences consisting of four or more bedrooms shall provide a three car garage. Each enclosed parking stall shall provide 10' x 20' interior clear dimensions. The project is proposing 26 enclosed parking spaces, consisting of ten (10) 1-car garages, and two (2) 8-car enclosed carports, or a total of sixteen (16) carport spaces. No open guest parking stalls are provided. The current code requirements mandate providing twenty-eight (28) enclosed parking stalls, plus 7 guests parking stalls, totaling 35 parking spaces. Floor plans identify a total of six buildings with three buildings and seven units located at 11339 Louise Avenue and the other three buildings located at 11341 Louise Avenue consist of seven units. There are a total of ten 2-bedroom units and four 3-bedroom units within the development. The elevations identify two-story structures with stucco siding and composition asphalt shingle roofs. In the R-3 zone the Lynwood Municipal Code allows a maximum density of one (1) unit per 2,420 square feet of property area. The property is sufficient in size to accommodate a maximum of ten (10) residential condominiums. The property is legal non-conforming per Conditional Use Permit 88093, Resolution No. 2247, approved by the Planning Commission. The proposal is consistent with provisions set forth in the State Subdivision Map Act and Lynwood Municipal Code Chapter 24, Subdivisions. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15301(k). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission withdraw the decision to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-14 to convert fourteen (14) existing condominiums into twelve (12) residential condominiums, and continue the item to the Planning Commission meeting of November 13, 2007. Attachments: 1. Project Profile 2. Location Map 3. Plans 3 P!t®JECT Pik®FILE Conditional Use Permit No 2007-14 Tentative Tract Map No. 2007-04 (69283) & Variance 2007-05 11339-11341 Louise Avenue (APN 6197-023-043) 1. 2. 3. 4. Source and Authority Lynwood Municipal Code (LMC) Section 25.20 sets forth development standards in residential zones and LMC Chapter 24 sets forth subdivision regulations. Propert~Location and Size The subject property totals 25,929 square feet in area. The project proposes to convert fourteen (14} existing apartments into residential condominiums. The residences consist of six (6) buildings, two-stories in height with attached garages. Existing Land Uses Site Developed North: Multi Family Residential South: Multi Family Residential West: Two Family Residential East: Multi Family Residential Land Use Designation The subject property has a General Plan Designation of Multi Family Residential and the current zoning is R-3 (Multi Family Residential). The adjoining properties General Plan and Zoning designations are as follows: Site General Plan North: Multi Family Residential South: Multi Family Residential West: Two Family Residential East: Multi Family Residential Zonina R-3 (Multi Family Residential) R-3 (Multi Family Residential) R-2 (Two Family Residential) R-3 (Multi Family Residential) 4 5. Site Plan Review The Site Plan Review Committee has reviewed the project denied and recommended to be continued to the next regular meeting August 14, 2007 pending Fire Department approval and redesign of project. 6. Code Enforcement History None at the time of this report. 7. Public Response None;at the time of this report. 5 ,. , I I I i I I I "I ..~ ' I I La. I I I I I I _ 1 i I I I I I 1 "' n l .~ r. ~ r, g . C rG s !z n.O 7•I\' n to ~; ' ' I I I I 1 I 5 ~I i ' I ~ ~ I j ~ G52 I I I I I I I ~ I 1 so J.1 Jo I I I I I I I I I I I nvr e. Lrst v - s^a1 ynn' 8 Z s 51 Q I rrrm.rsu: I I la•w G.+/rU,: F rr.A JSi L o /~ cc ,rprs_ ~ _er l~l Ja L_ ~ 50 ^,;/9' I lJi/F"f 5~ I I 10 56 6C IJI IO I I 54 _- w -- I , Q so I I 1~ ` I I ~t ^ I I I I x n A' 1 rUS', ~ I I .ro ~49 ' '~ e.e' ul ~ n F 4i '~ rz hl Q ~e Q ~ Q' -ii T-es O al © ^ 18 41 4 I 0~ I\ 1 ~ I I I 1 I I I rc I I I I I I ": (in 1 (_l l- I. I I I I 1 I Z U i I I I ~ I N K 6'J SO N [Y 02 .. .. of 2 LOUISE 1, .cro•oo'w .e' A R 4B O J Q l7 Y K W f- J Z Q .SJ 8 ~~ l,p N I I ~ I I 39 JJ I I IO N I W n¢st. JJ .l0 N l// SJ I {q .~ p o :I®~ I ~ I I I I I I I ~©`I I n Do I I I I ~ I __ 20 n ¢-1 ~ I ` ° I I4 13 1 ~ ©I __-- 91 I 1 0 I 1] I 16 12 _ - _ ~ I I I 1 - a _ ~ ___ O ~ I , I I 1 I BLK. __ __ J Jo w Ia m iJ m I su bO n n w ~' o O a g i $ nl•a'll I I _ _ I I I 2 3 d 5 6 ] B 1 C 10 m I I I ~ T v pii ~ ©, ' I a I ~~ 1 I I ~~I 1 ` ~5 lODD 3l SO EO M A tJ )l b N Q ,N_~ild~ $ouNCnN goo[ 6069 Gasc No. t'UP 2007-14, TTM 2007-03 & VAR 2007-OS Site Address: 11339-11341 LOUISE AVENUE Applicant Name: A~1an Reatn ~~L J (D t7 Z Y ' > w I H J Z K Q ' ~ ~ [R;] 300' or [ J 500' Radius Map