The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutTBP 1996-07-17 ~ . . TOWN OF FRASER "Icebox of the Nation" P.O. Box 120/153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, Colorado 80442 (970) 726-5491 I FAX Line: (970) 726-5518 I I I TOWN BOARn AGENDA 1 REGULAR ~EETING JULY 17, 199 ,7:30 p.m. 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of 7/3 minutes 3. Open Forum I I 4. Monique Gilbert, NWCOG Water Quality/Quantity Committ~e 5. Resolution to consider deeding real pr+erty from the Town of Fraser to the Fraser Cemetery Association. 6. Fraser Valley Parkway I , I 7. Staff Choice a) Staff will request an extcutive session to consider real estate acquisition and to discuss negotiati ns. 8. Board Member's Choice I MEETING SCHEDULE REMINDER I I , July 24th: Planning Commission regular meeting I I July 25th: Joint Fraser, Winter Park, County Com~issioner, & Citizen's Growth Committee meeting. 6:30 p,m.. East Grand Fire Dtstrict Headquarters August 1st: Growth Tools workshop, 6:00 Silver C eek August 7th: Fraser Board Regular Meeting August 21 st: Fraser Board Regular Meeting I August 28th: Fraser Planning Commission Regular rt'1eeting August 29th: Fraser Board "Advance" 3:00 - 9:00 p.lIn. August 30th: Fraser Board "Advance II" 7:30 a,m. bteakfast, 8:00 - 12:00 work session I ,]1 ." . ' ' ,'~ TOWN OF FRASERlr -- <>f!be Nation" t . P.O. Box '20 1163 F~ venue Fraser, Colorad80442 " , .'(970) 7 6..s491 FAX Llne: (970) 7 6-5518 i' ,', t I . ManI13~r'$Briefi!'g: July 15, 11 New Thiflgs . , Heres hoping Becky haS a speedy d full recovery frOII\herfallon the new (but rough) Fraser Riyer Trail ali~ent. . S~e has quit a story to tellan~ I = someone else should be 'responsible' for bringing Becky's fa rite.treats on,Wedn sday night. . . " .. .."..,. . I . WedneSdlly, you'll~an up<h1telIlMoniqne ~ on NWCOO's water Quality/quantity . committee. This committee watche water.issues for.. . COG and its members (Fraser pays a separate fee to belong to "QQ"). Al 0 on the agenda is a resolutiol1 transferring real property froIl1.theT~wnQfFraserto the Frasf C:meteryAss6c~a'on ~ thereso~uti~n tracks the history on thistop1C and staffrecommends assmg the resolutio I. The resolution 1S ,marked "draft" Jl<:I!dingRod McGo~'s (eView. I~. be; requesting executive session after the meeting to discuss realesfi!.te acqUls1tion and n got1at}.ons. . , I .. ' :1. NWCOGisho~dingtheirannual re tlater this month dtheyhave requested that we fill-out the attached survey. I'd appreciate y'comment youha eonNWCOG's function and mission and r dlike to briefly talk about 'tIn : issue d1.lring Sta.frs hoiceWednesday night. Finally, Twin , Rivers management company (Alp' e Peaks) has reques edthat we honot our intent to provide . incentives to people who replace w "od burning stoves th gas burning appliances. The air q)llliity 0l'dinIlnc:e WIIhe brought fBoarclonAugus 7th - but stafIwould like to know how you want to address Twin Peak:' s f uest.. . ..~. .I '. . I ". . . . I · Old Things!1 ' . . With any luck, things may slowdo sQonand we'll be hIe to address many of the issues and concerns that have qeenbrought-up or short tenn proje. t8. Right now staffis "triaging" your issues and concerns andaddressings we can.. .. . . . . NWCCOGMEMBERSURVEY JUNE, 1996 Please complete the following survey by posing the questions below to your board or council and recording a summary of their responses. This information will be compiled and presented for the opening discussion at the July 25th NWCCOG retreat. Jurisdiction Name of Person Completing Survey INTRODUCTION Northwest Colorado Council of Governments (NWCCOG) is a membership organization comprised of 32 local governments within Region XII (Routt, Jackson, Grand, Summit, Eagle and Pitkin Counties). NWCCOG was created in 1972 and provides a variety of services to its members. NWCCOG's purpose is to . Provide high quality, cost effective, standard and customized services, technical assistance and capacity building within our areas of expertise- . Area Agency on Aging, . Community Development, . Elevator Inspection, . Energy Management and . Water Quality Planning. . Provide an opportunity for regional problem solving, information sharing and relationship development among the region's local governments. . Advocate for regional interests and funding with local, state and federal agencies. What does your local government want and need from a regional organization over the next 1-5 years? (i.e., leadership, services, etc.) "0 ýÿ . . . . What are the issues of common concern for this Region? (check those that are of the highest priority to your community) _ affordable living _ transportation _ economically challenged communities (lack a sufficient revenue base) bedroom communities' human service burden - revenue redistribution - _ interface of public lands, wild life and human habitat _ open space preservation _ intra-county cooperation other - Which of the following are appropriate roles for NWCCOG over the next five years? (check those that are the highest priority to your community) capacity building _ technical assistance within the areas of NWCCOG expertise _providing cost effective services _ dynamic regional leadership ~facilitation and mediation _ education and training other - , The following person(s) will attend the July 25th retreat: PLEASE RETURN TO SANDY BLAHA, NWCCOG, PO BOX 2308, SILVERTHORNE, COLORADO 80498 OR FAX TO 970-468-1208 BY JULY 18TH. '>- . . . . ~ DRAFT AGENDA NWCCOG JULY 25TH RETREAT CUSTOMER FOCUS DISCUSSION . Report On The Pre-Retreat Survey Of Members Interests And Needs . Break Out To Discuss Needs By Interest Group: Counties, Small Towns, Resort Towns. . Group Discussion, Conclusion, Summary - Identify barriers or conflicting interests VISION . Vision Of The Future The Dream (Ideal) NWCCOG . Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats . Review Each Program - Where Does It Fit The Vision, Where Might It Need To Change Refine The Vision Statement? ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT . What Expertise And Structure Are Needed To Fit The Vision . Review And Brainstorm Alternative Scenarios . Select Preferred Scenario, Structure And Expertise . Potential Ramifications Of The Selected Scenarios . financial . anticipated barriers, conflicts . Refine the selected Scenario? ACTION PLAN . Key Strategic Directives, Assign An Accountability And Time Frame To Each . Board's Role . Staff Role ..- ýÿ . . Alpine Peaks, Inc. - P.O. BOX 3123 Winter Park, CO. 80482 (970) 726-8822 EXT. 349 Fax: (970) 726-5949 June 26, 1996 Town of Fraser P.O. Box 120 Fraser, CO 80442 Our guests and the local citizens have expressed concern over the increased amount of haze and pollution in the Fraser Valley. We are happy to inform you that the Twin Rivers Interval Owners Association and several of the whole owned units at Twin Rivers have converted to natural gas fIreplaces. A total of thirty-eight of the sixty units have converted to a fIreplace that is aesthetically pleasing and will add some 20,000 BTU's of heat to these previously all electric condominiums. We have taken a proactive stand and beaten the proposed rebate program into existence, we would request inclusion in the program should the town of Fraser adopt the new regulations. Alpine Peaks, Inc. shares the town councils concern for the natural beauty of the area and supports your effort to keep the air and other natural assets of the area preserved. We will continue to encourage the other associations and condominium owners whose units we manage to convert their fIreplaces. Sincerely, Alpine Peaks, Inc. David Lehr Property Manager - ... _.... .-... . . .... . " - . . . MINUTES DATE: Tuesday, July 2, 1996 MEETING: Winter Park Town Council PLACE: Town Hall Council Chambers PRESENT: Mayor Nick Teverbaugh; Councilors: Jim Myers, Joel Brownson, Paul Lewis, Larry Duane and Rosie Schiesl; Town Manager Daryl Shrum and Town Clerk Nancy Anderson OTHEgS PRESENT: Community Development Director Mark Marchus; Town Planner Bob Caravona; Lane Wyatt, NWCCOG; Stephanie Camozzi, Smokin' Moe's; Jack O'Shea, WPFV Chamber and Harry Williamson, MANIFEST Mayor Teverbaugh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p,m. Councilor Brownson moved and Councilor Duane seconded the motion approving the Minutes of the June 18, 1996 meeting as presented. Motion carried: 6-0. 4. NEW BUSINESS: 4.A. Town Hall Meeting I I Mayor Teverbaugh opened the Town Hall Meeting for items of concern not on the agenda. Hearing none, the Town Hall Meeting was closed. 4.B. Liquor License Transfer of Ownership - Bar-B-Oue Ventures. Inc. d.b.a. Smokin' Moe's Rib House & Saloon - Hotel and Restaurant with Extended Hours License With Stephanie Camozzi present, Councilor Brownson moved and Councilor Schiesl seconded the motion to approve the transfer of a Hotel and Restaurant with Extended Hours Liquor License to Bar-B-Que Ventu^res, Inc. doing business as Smokin' Moe's Rib House & Saloon. Motion carried: 6-0 4.C. NWCCOG 00 Update - Lane Wyatt Lane Wyatt presented the Council with a document that related the purpose and history of the Water Quality and Quantity Committee (QQ). Mr. Wyatt reviewed the history of QQ and how it has evolved. Currently the Coriunittee is working with the 208 Plan. A GO-CO Grant has been received for the 208 Plan implementation. 4.D. Ordinance No. 243. Deleting Sections from Town Zoning Code - Second Reading and Public Hearing Mayor Teverbaugh opened the Public Hearing on Ordinance No. 243 for citizen comment. Hearing none, the Public Hearing was closed. Councilor Brownson moved and Councilor Schiesl seconded the motion adopting Ordinance No. 243, AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF WINTER PARK, . . . Minutes . Town Council Meeting July 2, 1996 COLORADO DELETING TITLE 7, CHAPTER 4B, SECTION 3D, AND DELETING TITLE 7, CHAPTER 5A, SECTION 3D AND DELETING TITLE 7, CHAPTER 5B, SECTION 3D AND DELETING TITLE 7, CHAPTER 6A, SECTION 3D FROM THE TOWN ZONING CODE. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: Jim Myers "aye" Joel Brownson "aye" Paul Lewis "aye" Larry Duane "aye" Rosie Schiesl "aye" Nick Teverbaugh "aye" 4.E. Town Manager Reports Key items discussed included the following: I. May Sales Tax Report 2. Wolf Park Tennis Courts The Town Manager has received a complaint about the multi-use court. The citizen felt that basketball would interfere with tennis play. A schedule board is being researched. 3. Wolf Park Irrigation System Due to tight scheduling, To\'vn Manager Shrum .contracted with Routt County Landscaping to install an irrigation system at Wolf Park. The work is currently underway. 4. Grand County Library Thank You Note 5. Tom Young's Landscaping Escrow Tom Young has requested that his landscaping escrow held by the Town be returned. Town Manager Shrum presented a response letter to Mr. Young's request for tlle Mayor's signature. CCD Marchus reviewed the landscaping plan that was approved for Mr. Young's project. Follo\\ing discussion, Councilor Schiesl moved and Councilor Duane seconded the motion authorizing the Mayor to sign the letter addressed to Mr. Young. Motion carried: 6-0 6. Summary of Grand County Survey Additional information is available through the Town Planner's Offlce. 7. Grand Cache Thank You Note 8. Railroad Car The railroad car has been moved (out of the County) from its site next to Cooper Creek Square. The site will be cleaned up following the 4th of July holiday. Currently, Coldwell Banker is hosting a post carving demonstration on the train car site. The Fraser Fun Run is scheduled for Saturday, July 6, 1996. A copy of the course was given to the Council. , . . . Minutes Town Council Meeting July 2, 1996 5. Committee Reports A. Planning and Zoning Commission No report B. Design Review Committee No report C. Board of Adjustments Committee No report D. Water No report E. Transportation No report F. NWCCOG No report 1 6. Executive Session 1 Councilor Myers moved and Councilor Brownson seconded the motion to go into Executive Session to discuss property acquisitions and right-of-way negotiations (C.R.S. ~ 24-6-402-4(a)). The motion carried by unanimous vote. Upon conclusion of discussion, the motion was made by Councilor Brownson, seconded by Councilor Myers and was unanimously carried to return to Regular Session. Resolution No. 460 - Work Tasks and Financial Obligations to be Performed by the Town as part of the Purchase of Property by the Town from Noel Wilson Councilor Brownson moved and Councilor Myers seconded the motion approving Resolution No. 460, outlining work tasks and financial obligations to be performed by the Town as part of the purchase of property from Noel Wilson. . Motion carried: 6-0 There being no further business to discuss, upon a motion regularly adopted, the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. The next scheduled meeting of the Town Council will be Tuesday, July 16, 1996 at 8:00 a.m., in the Town Hall Council Chambers. ~~ Town Clerk ýÿ .. . .TER PARK TOWN COUNCIL MEE. Tuesday, July 16, 1996 - 8:00 a.m. 1. Meeting Call to Order 2. Roll Call of Council Members 3. Approval of July 2, 1996 Meeting Minutes and July II, 1996 Special Meeting Minutes 4. NE'''' BUSINESS: A. Town Hall Meeting I. Randa Laman - County Commissioner Candidate B. Liquor Licenses I. Winter Park Restaurant Co. db.a. The Lodge at Sunspot - Renewal - Hotel and Restaurant with Extended Hours and Optional Premises License 2. Eric S. Tryggeseth d.b,a, Lord Gore Arms Pub- Renewal - Tavern with E:>..'tended Hours License 3. The Last Waltz, Inc. - Change in Registered Manager - Hotel and Restaurant \.vith Extended Hours License 4. Alpeggios, Inc. - Transfer of Ownership - Hotel and Restaurant with Extended Hours License 5. Public Hearing - Special Events Pernlit - Winter Park/Fraser Valley Chamber of Commerce - IGng of the Rockies on August 10, 1996 C. Progress Reports I. Sheriffs Report 2. Chamber - Catherine Ross 3. Public Works - Tom Russell 4. Community Development - Mark Marchus D. Tom Young - Rome on the Range Landscaping E. Resolution No. 461, Approving an Access and Annexation Agreement ,,,,rith Fraser and Maryvale F. Ordinance No. 244 (An Emergency Ordinance), Selling Town Property in Conjunction with Improving IGngs Crossing Road - First and Final Reading ~ G. Appointment of Board Member to Headwaters Trail Alliance H. Town Manager Reports 5. Committee Reports A. Planning and Zoning Commission B. Design Review Committee C. Board of Adjustment Committee D. Water E. Transportation F. NWCCOG 6. Executive Session A. Property Acquisitions and Lawsuit ýÿ ... ~ , ~ . . TOWN BOARU JULY 3, 1996 Special :MeeUng 6:00 p.m. Mayor Johnston opened the special meeting. Board present were Jolmston, K1ancke, Swatzell, McIntyre, Sanders, Wirsing and Havens. Also present were Reid, Winter and McGowan. Swatzell moved to go into an executive session to discuss real estate acquisition issues and Maryvale negotiation postures, 2nd Klancke, carried. Board came out of executive session at 7:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. open regular meoting Mayor Johnston opened the regular meeting at 7:30 p.m. Board present were KJancke, Wirsing, Ilavens, Swatzell, Sanders, and Mcintyre. Also present were Reid, Winter and Attorney McGowan. Minutes of the previous meeting were approved as written. Open Forum Cathy Ross reviewed activities that will be held over the 4th of July weekend. Stop sign at Norgren and Mill was discussed with regards to the Rodeo traffic. Sheridan advised the Board that the County Is still looking at the options for the Parkway. Commissioner candidate Randa Laman. Laman introduced herself as she is running for County Commissioner in District n. Laman welcomes any questions the public may have at any time. Maryvale :Meadow discussion Mayor Johnston reviewed that the price to buy the meadow is 4.5 MiUion dollars and this is nol a possible for lhe Town of Fraser, and even with belp from grants tbe cost is prohibitive. Ilowever the Town .8 looking at other options in working with the developers to come up with a plan that docs not impact the meadow to the degree that the original PDD plan allows. Johnston stated that the Town is working towards the best solution pOl!l!iblo undor tho oirouml!tanoo3, but tho oommunity mUl!t undomtcmd that t110 Town oem not buy the meadow. Vallous comments were made by the audience. ýÿ ... ., . . - . IGA Grand County Trails Reid presented an agreement for .he creation of a county wide trails organization as weD as funding for the organization. Town will request a copy of the proposed budget from this gmup. Swatzell moved to approve tlus lOA, 2nd Sanders, earned. Mcintyre asked to be the Board member of tllis organization. Board Choice Sanders discussed the Growth task force and gave the Board their mission statement. Also Buchheister needs to be replaced on the task force as she does not attend tile meetings. Swatzell asked if the Board would fund a class she would like to attend on Leadership. Wirsing moved to fund this class, 2nd Sanders, earned. Board again discussed Rodeo traffic problems and possible solutions. Klancke feels certain that the tree cutting program for Ptg. can be accomplished. Executive session Ilavens moved to go into executive session to discuss property acquisition and negotiations, 2nd Sanders, caDied. Meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m. ýÿ WATER QUALITY & DEVELOPMENT DRAFT Grand County Fraser Impacts Ordinance Triggers Standards Exemptions Encroachment / · Fraser Subdivision · Special site · 30' setback measured horizontally from . Setbacks Regulations (1983) - considerations (Stream mean high water mark required for Fraser Regs. 3.5.1 (3) & Setbacks) River, all intermittent streams/creeks, and 6,2.4 drainage ways draining 20 acres or more. A greater setback of 150' may be required in some instances to protect public health, safety, and welfare. (e,g" slopes greater than 30%, highly eroidable soils, proposed use of property represents special hazard to water quality) · Subdivision · Grading or earth · All graded or disturbed site - must have Variances granted if no Regulations 3.6 & disturbing activities revegetation & erosion control plan - no direct detrimental effects to public Drainage & Erosion 4.4.2(6) discharges in to water bodies unless preceded health, safety & welfare and/or by 1 or more control measures following these regulations to · Subdivision · Special site . Residential occupancy not allowed on steep, the strict letter would result in Regulations 3.5.1 (1) considerations (steep, unstable, swampy lands subject to inadequate a significant hardship to the unstable, or swampy lands) drainage, avalanche or rock slides, or geologic owner of the property . hazards · Subdivision · Submittal Requirements . Must include in preliminary plan: soil Regulations 4.3. 1 reports including water table levels & geologic - conditions identified; any hazardous areas that will require special construction methods must be identified; and conceptual drainage plan t coordinated with soil and geologic reports. · Subdivision · Steep slopes · Development on slopes greater than 20% Regulations 6.2.6 and less than 40% will be required to have engineering studies performed to determine suitability (in general, development discouraged on slopes greater than 300/0, prohibited on slopes greater than 40%) I · Fraser Subdivision · Submittal requirements · Developer must provide certificate from Variances granted if no Regulations (1983) qualified professional engineer approving detrimental effects to public Stormwater Reg. 4.4.2(3)(1) snow removal plan, storm drainage plan, health, safety & welfare andlor Drainage & Urban domestic water system plan, & any other plan following these regulations to required to handle flooding the strict letter would result in Runoff · Subdivision · Submittal requirements · Subdividers shall provide storm drainage a significant hardship on Regulation 4.4.2(6) designs which will mitigate high water tables, owner of the property to contain run-olT in excess of historical flows, erosion and polI~tion control mitigation measures and related water quality problems associated with proposed project. . · Subdivision · Design standards · New subdivisions shall be designed so as to Regulations 6. I. I not overburden storm drainage systems · Subdivision · Stormwater Drainage · Drainage plans shall not increase historical Regulations 6.6 Plans runoff and will not result in degradation of streams Wastewater (septic, · Subdivision · Public sewage system · Public water & sewage systems, treatment municipal Regulations 6.7 and disposal systems shall be required in all industrial) subdivisions Wetlands Toxics & Chemical Management · Subdivision · Open space requirement · Minimum of 45% of the area subdivided . Regulations 6. I 1.3 shall be common open space Impervious Cover Drinking Water Enforcement · Subdivision · Penalty · $ 300 fine or imprisonment for violation of Regulations 1.9.2 these regulations 2 WATER QUALITY & DEVELOPMENT DR4Fr Grand County Winter Park Impacts Ordinance Triggers Standards Exemptions Encroachment I · Planning & Zoning . 30' setback measured horizontally from Setbacks 8-3-4 mean high water mark required for Fraser . River, all intermittent streams/creeks, and drainage ways draining 20 acres or more. A greater setback of 150' may be required in some instances to protect public health, safety, and welfare. (e.g., slopes greater than 30%, highly eroidable soils, proposed use of property represents special hazard to water quality) · Planning & Zoning · Erosion control on site in . Development shall minimize disturbance of 7-3-15 conformity with Town's natural vegetation and soil cover and must Drainage & Erosion Master Plan (design) include provision and guarantee for revegetation and soil stabilization during and after construction. All cuts and fills must be designed so as to minimize erosion and stabilize mass. Natural drainage patterns must . be preserved so as not to increase erosion. Natural vegetation and soil cover must be preserved adjacent to rivers, streams, lakes, and reservoirs . Planning & Zoning . Submittal requirements . Applicant must submit guarantee of any 7-3-15 temporary or permanent measures necessary to prevent I control anticipated erosion problems . Planning & Zoning · Submittal requirements . Revegetation landscaping plan shall be 8-3-7 provided and topsoil shall be saved and protected from erosion · Subdivision design · Obligations after site . Subdivider must provide for maintenance of standards 8-3-11 completion all permanent erosion control for one year after certificates of occupancy have been issued and then the Town shall maintain. ýÿ · Planning & Zoning · Runoff flows from site · Historical flow patterns and runoff amounts 7-3-14 must be maintained and will not exceed runoff Stormwater levels from site in its natural state. The site must be capable of accommodating runoff Drainage & Urban from upstream sites as well. Runoff . Planning & Zoning . Introduction of new . If new pollutants will be introduced into 7-3-14 pollutants into runoff runoff waters from site, provision must be made for storage, treatment and removal of such pollutants . Subdivision design . Subdivision design . Subdivisions shall be designed so as avoid . Standards 8-3-1 casting undue burden on storm drainage system · Planning & Zoning · Drainage plan · Dischargc of runoff from collection or Wastewater (septic, 7-3-14 requirements detention facilities must meet applicable waste municipal & water standards of the State Department of Health or State Water Quality Control industrial) · Subdivision Regs . Sanitary sewer plans for . Sewer plans other than on-lot standards and 8-3-9 subdivisions technical systems must comply \vith applicable standards adopted by the Col. Board of Health Toxics & Chemical Management Wetlands ISDS Impervious Cover . Drinking Water · Subdivision Regs · Water supply standards . Water supply systems shall be consistent 8-3-9 for subdivisions with subdivision regulations and regulations of water and sanitation districts. Water supply systems shall be designed so as to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into systcm and avoid impairmcnt of thc systcm. Enforcement ~ h~c.:i "Ctlrl'\,\t4;:\ \,d"I:h\ 2 ýÿ . . The Northwest Colorado Council of Governments WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY COMMITTEE CQQ) PURPOSE The mission of the Water Quality and Quantity Committee (QQ) is "to enable its members to protect and enhance the quality of Colorado's waters while facilitating the responsible use of those resources for the good of all Colorado citizens and its environment. " QQ monitors water development activities and legislative initiatives which affect water quality or quantity in the basin of origin. Regularly scheduled meetings of the QQ Committee operate as a forum for policy formulation and strategy decision-making by QQ Committee members. The QQ Committee staff provide members with monitoring of legislative activities, water quality information, litigation and advocacy support, activity coordination, cooperative problem-solving assistance, transmountain diversion oversight, and technical assistance to further intergovernmental cooperation and increase political clout with state and federal agencies. mSTORY The QQ Committee was first established in 1978 as a cost savings measure designed to coordinate legal activities regarding transmountain diversions for the headwater counties. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, elected officials from headwater communities found it difficult, if not impossible, to have a voice in water issues that affected their communities. Today, communications between East and West Slope local government officials occur frequently and headwater communities are clearly recognized as players in the process. QQ has worked to turn the litigation and challenges which characterized the 1980s into new efforts which promote cooperative problem-solving approaches to water issues in the 1990s. The QQ Committee has been a leader in this arena, sponsoring the Glendale Water Forum, the 1991 Water Quality Search Conference in Winter Park, and initiating the Colorado River Headwater Forum. These efforts brought together diverse stakeholders in the Upper Colorado River Basin and began exploring a common vision of Region 12's and Colorado's common future in water issues. , Other QQ activities have included the following: . QQ staff assisted in the drafting ofHB 1041 regulations for member counties . QQ defended Eagle County's denial of a 1041 permit for the Homestake n water diversion project . QQ represented several member jurisdictions in the State's hearings on adopting the Antidegradation Rule and the State's 401 rulemaking process . NWCCOG and QQ worked to get a state-of-the-art water quality management plan that linked water quality and quantity adopted by the Water Quality Control Commission . QQ initiated and administered the Colorado River Headwater Forum . QQ sent an open letter to the Front Range requesting a comprehensive approach to water management in the state I . . CURRENT LEGISLATIVE INTERESTS QQ will continue to monitor any legislation addressing HB 1041 authority and will actively work to protect HB 1041 from being weakened in any form. QQ will actively monitor any future legislation that pertains to "takings" issues. Any proposed changes in Colorado's Instream Flows program will be tracked and, based on membership input, QQ Staff will take the necessary steps to ensure that QQ's position is represented at the appropriate forums. Water quality protection and watershed management remain strong priorities for our members. ORGANIZATION The QQ Committee is a division of the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments. 1996 QQ members are: Eagle County Aspen Aspen Sanitation District Grand County Breckenridge Bellyache Ridge Metro District Pitkin County Dillon Breckenridge Sanitation District Summit County Eagle Columbine Lake Water and San. Dist Gunnison County Fraser Copper Mtn. Water and San. Dist Frisco Dillon Valley Metro District Gypsum East Dillon Water District Hot Sulphur Springs Fraser Sanitation District Kremmling Frisco Sanitation District Vail Granby Sanitation District Winter Park Grand County Water and San. Dist. Hamilton Creek Water and San. Dist Kremmling Sanitation District Lake Creek Metro District Morrison Creek Water and San. District Ml Werner Water and San. District North Shore Water and San. District Redstone Water and San. District Silver Creek Water District Three Lakes Sanitation District Upper Eagle Valley Consolidated Vail Valley Consolidated White Horse Springs Winter Park Water and San. Dist . ,J . . TOWN OF FRASER fIDflJill~ ~ RESOLUTION A resolution approving a land transfer from the Town of Fraser to the Fraser Cemetery Association. WHEREAS, in 1909 a parcel ofland (exhibit "A" attached) was deeded to the Town of East om for the purpose of creating a cemetery; and WHEREAS, in _ the Town of East om ceased to exist when the Town of Fraser was incorporated with all assets and liabilities of the Town of Eastom becoming the Town of Fraser's; and WHEREAS, in 1975 the Fraser Cemetery Association was formed to maintain the Fraser Cemetery located off of County Road 72; and WHEREAS, in or around 1992 the Town of Fraser learned that a "second" cemetery existed (see exhibit "A") that was the Town's responsibility and that the Fraser Cemetery Association was interested in having the "new" cemetery deeded to them. At that time the Fraser Town Board agreed that they would deed this parcel to the Fraser Cemetery Association if the Association would pay for the required legal work associated with the transfer. The Cemetery Association did not have the financial resources to complete the transfer at that time; and WHEREAS, in April of this year the Keystone Development Company approached the Town of Fraser about granting an easement through the Cemetery parcel described in exhibit" A" for the purpose of constructing a road through this property. Upon this contact, Town staff facilitated discussion between the Fraser Cemetery Association and Keystone that resulted in an agreement (exhibit "B" attached) that benefits all parties, contingent upon the Town of Fraser deeding the parcel ofland described in exhibit "A" to the Fraser Cemetery Association; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES THAT THE REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED BY EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED BE DEEDED TO THE FRASER CEMETERY ASSOCIATION. DULY MOVED, SECONDED, AND ADOPTED THIS _ DAY OF JULY, 1996. TOWN OF FRASER By: Mayor Attest: Town Clerk EXHIBIT B . Keystonl'nevelopment Co!pany 7000 E. Belleview A venue Suite 350 Greenwood Village. CO 80111 (303) 771-3533 Phone (303) 771-3573 FAX July 8, 1996 Mr. Chuck Reed, Manager Town of Fraser P.O'. Box 120 Fraser, CO 80442 Ref: pinon Ridge Subdivision Dear Chuck, Enclosed is a copy of the Minutes from the June 14, 1996 meeting of the Fraser Cemetery Association. As you can see from the Minutes, the Association approved the granting of an easement to the owner of pinon Ridge subject to certain terms and conditions. Blum Properties, Inc. is willing to agree to all of those conditions. The purpose of this letter is to authorize the Town Attorney, Mr. Rod McGowan to draft the documents required for the Town to transfer title to the land for the easement to the Fraser Cemetery Association. Furthermore, we are requesting that Mr. McGowan also draft the necessary documents for the Association to subsequently grant the easement to the owner of pinon Ridge. Blum Properties, Inc. has agreed to pay the cost of the Town Attorney's work relating to these items. I think the best method for the easement is to grant the easement to Blum Properties, Inc., the current owner of pinon Ridge, but provide that the benefit of the easement automatically inures to any subsequent owners of any of the three lots in pinon Ridge. I have enclosed a copy of t~e plat for your reference. I will be available either to meet with Mr. McGowan in Fraser or by telephone to work out details. Please call me if you need further information. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, f!::~::::r~ ýÿ , . . . IIRADFORD I'UIII.'.HING co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS FRASER CEMETERY ASSOCIATION SPECIAL MEErING A special meeting of the Fraser Ceme tery Association was held June l~, 1996 at the Fraser rrwon Hall. Meeting called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Vice President Ernest Johnson. other board members present were Kirk Klancke, David Cautrell and Alta Gesellman. Guests were: r:Ihelma Hill, Edna Tucker..l Dewey Leonard, Becky Swatzell and Dorothy Cautrel1. First order of business was to decide if we should amend our by-laws. Article II, Section I, Board of Directors. After discussion it was moved by Klancke, 2nd Johnson and carried we increase the number of directors from five (5) members to seven (7) members. Moved by Klancke, 2nd by Johnson and carried that Edwin Hill, Box ~7~, Granby, CO 80446 be nominated to serve a term of six (6) years as oneof the new directol's. Hill accepted. Second order of business was again to discuss the offer from the owner of Pinon-Ridge for an easement for a road thru property where cemetery "Town of Fastom" is located. The fo~lowing terms decided were: 1) Road - 20ft drive way with 10ft. snow removal 2) 100% maintenance by home-owners association of Pinon:" Ridge. 3) OWner will pay all costs for transfer of title. (legal fees, survey, title search, etc.) ~) Six Thousand Dollars ($6,OOO.OO)payment guaranteed to Fraser Cemetery AS~30ciation. 5) Non-exclusive easement givento Fraser Cemetery and/or their successors and assignees. 6) Road and property clean up after road construction with final inspection of cemetery board. 7) Road exclusive to three lots of Pinon-Ridge. 8) Final location of road' nust be approved by Cemetery Board prior to construction. Moved by K1ancke, 2nd Cautrell these terms of easement will be approved if all terms are met. Motion carried. Moved by Cautrell, 2nd Gesellman and carried the meeting bf adjourned at 8:10 p.m. d~)?,. ,5/..,(. UI/~"f.A-"". Alta M. Gesellman r EXHIBIT FOR LOl- 18 ACCESS EASEMENT AND / SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT \ / NOTE: \ THIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT REPRESENT A MONUMENlED SURVE~ BUT IT IS ONLy INlENDED TO DEPICT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOt 1 B THA T IS SHOWN HEREON. FOUl? H:~}~ ES7.:d.1ES SUBD. ~ UNf/' Nl.l,MBEI? ONE ~ P<HN~OF >--- ---- - ---/ -- - BEGINNING PARCEL ':.4- FOl.f,'T H:~)'" ESl.:d.7ES SUB/). l.Wf/' NUMBER ONE POINT OF' TERMINUS EASTERLY BOUNDARY TRACT "A" . .., b CII 10' rA~U\JJrAGE .... ~ J SOUTHYtEST CORNER LEGEND SOUTHEAST ", SOUTHYtEST " . ~no!!.. 17~ R 75 W . INDICA TES CHANGE OF COURSE ONLY - OHU -INDICATES OVERHEAD UTILITY WIRES SCALE: ,. - 100' rn. INDICA TES UTILITY POLES LEGAlcr-.QESC81PTlQN A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL -A- Of" f"OUR WAY ESTATES SUBDIVISION, UNIT NUMBER ONE AS RECORDED IN THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S Of"FlCE AT RECEPTION No. 123701, SAID PARCEL ALSO BEING A PORTION Of" THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER Of" THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Of" SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST Of" THE SIXTH PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS f"OLLOWS: A STRIP Of" LAND TWENTY (20) FEET IN WIDTH, BEING TEN (10) f"EET ON EACH SIDE Of" THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE WITH THE RIGHT-Of"-WAY LINES Of" SAID EASEMENT EXTENDING AHEAD OR BACK TO INTERSECT THE BEGINNING AND TERMINATING LINES INDICA TED: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of" THE SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER Of" THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER or SECTION 17: THENCE NORTH 00"22'00- WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE Of" THE SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, WITH, ALL BEARINGS HEREIN RELATED THERETO, A DISTANCE OF 259.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05"3"45-, HAVING A RADIUS OF 75.00 FEET, AND HAVING A ARC LENGTH OF 7.24 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 45"57'53- EAST: THENCE SOUTH 48"43'45- EAST A DISTANCE OF 43.13 FEET TO A POINT or CURVATURE: THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27"25'35-, HAVING A RADIUS Of" 75.00 FEET, AND HAVING A ARC LENGTH Of" 35.90 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 76"09'20- EAST A DISTANCE OF 225.53 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 84"57'27- EAST A DISTANCE OF 227.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85"55'33- EAST A DISTANCE OF 222.83 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 87"56'07- EAST A DISTANCE OF 70.87 f"EET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT Of" TE~MINUS, SAID POINT AlSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE Of" SAID PARCEL -A-. TOGETHER WITH TENJ'0~ FEET WIDE SNOW STORAGE EASEMENTS BEING TEN FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE PREVIOUSLY DE RI ED ACCESS EASEMENT. m Corroll & Longe J IR:r.lwlA"- - II2llCl SHEET 1 ~ 1 ACCUS EAllOIENY ...: 1281. 07/1I/1e REV.t ýÿ fl' b · 1- A .~\ \ \ ,,} \ .J , II c. , )(on, I . -= ~<; _'.. ._ .. .... .._. .._.... .... .. '.... WARRANTY DEED. ... ...__....... .. .._ .__ No //1--7/~- "r f lD ~ b~ ~ ' \ltb 8 eebt AIRlIe thIs .. X. ---?iY ,of ~ STAra 01" COLORADO, J In the year of our Lpnl ono thousnnd nine bundrclI nlUl_~Y""" , ootwel'1I J hereb:O=, ::a~::I:~~llrument.aI ::~d r tit Cf! c?~o:.- .Jlt ' - r ... ~~ . --= -.....-1 S' &-t f 0010 d ,S 0 e ...~--m- 01111 Y 0 ~__~._, Rnt ... eo ra 0, for record In~ at / o'clock or the, Bret part, and .!Yk~ CL''H-U~~ l..~::?:k~ . LZdl- dM." d~dl Lhk .~ 19;~ Ofth~~"'~'7L'I&~~'- CoII:'~~~f"=~'~"~'-'--~~;~Stateor Oolorado, an I U, recor e n uuu -~p.Re-7- of the socond part; Wr~SJ~TlI. . That t ~ s,lId II1Irt.!.llr tho first IIRrt, for amI In consideration of the ny ::~h:f sRld ll~~ Arst- part I;;-il~~;~~;:;:;'~;the snld--;;~;t~~of . ~he seco~O~~t~I~~ recclJ,t whoreof Is "creby confcs~p.d Rml ncknowlp.dgcd, hng grantcll, Itnrgnincd, sold and conveyed, allll by tlll.'se prcsl\nls do~grnnt, bargnln, soli, cOIIVIlY allll confirm IInto the SRid part~ of the second parI, heirs 'lIId lI~ll8'lIs forevl!r, nil the following d~rihClI ~_~ IJRrccl_llr In~J, situate, lyIng and b(!/yJf In the , Collllly ofOfalld, alldStnte of .Colorndo,to-~it: (./)--;p~,-~?~.~./.......~l._~...1-, ~ ../~ ~- I If ~JI~t!..-,-,~ d.-,.-."-V~ ~ ~ :r-..4.-~,' ..t'.A.rtf..,____~ <:t..t U ~ 4 ~ #......4--..(/ ~~~..IAI c..............d ~f ~ 0.7: @~ t. I?,-''''''~ 44-- .~--~ G' ff t:Jf?' t, i. ~ ~+. 4--.....( -C:/t: ~, i ..r.)l'~ f7J Y(.! 6/ -4 -f.-A'--'" 17 ~1' -1 't!':, .;p7~- ?'Y. iR~ ~ &./11..' if~ ~ Fo,..1"'"I h,(~~~~ ?((').."J'e ..27~,7'r/: ~ r 7t., I-! ~ /.r~~ -4-i d.L-<--V'--~ ~ ~ :l:."""~' ~ "- ~ /0 ~ .....~~ zt:e. ....d_ ~j ~-~..,{ 73,;;J, ~ ,-, ~.J": 1'~':Jt!J ". q, t!/. k ~~ .9: -r .P #> ::u.: f, t . /.(JFf J4 4 e...,.. ~~ 3. . t('-4t ~ ---".. If ~ ~ ~ ~ .7~..... '] ~-?'Id-. ,~~~ ,a...~ -a, /H-A- ~ ~..t..,1 ~,4 '7-')ta.-r-~ ~1l?~.9, ~ ~ ~'.--.,.....J rzr.:J. ~ 'I IS-' -(,', /I.,? I!u.-t-. ~f-A!.~ / ~" ",,/5' !. i 7/'. J/ </. j{# ~; e. ~ ')f~ P, 0-'11. JI ~ ~ IR~.k .~/d(~~~, ~'o.~' 81f~~ ~?.fol'jft'.r.d,FJE -6 ~ 'Jt..1. .&d. ;6-L~ i ~(J~,', e~"q~~ _ -:" 7S ~, c:L!J c?k.~ ~.~~ ~r-.. _<!Jf..::b.......--./ /o-r /6 C TOG ETHER with all and Ilngular the heredltnments alld nppnrtl'nanl'-CII thereunto helIJIIRIIIR, or III Rllywlfll! aJIIK'rlallllng, nlld lhe fl!verRlolJ 1\(1 reversIons, remnlmler and remnlnders, rents, Issues "nd proRts thereof; ,,11I1 "II ths llstall', right, tille, illWrl.'st, c1nim nlld drnl/ulll whal.Roever of he sllld pnrt..~.... of tbe first part, either In law or eqully, or, ill alllllo tho above bnrgolruxlllfemises, with Uw hl'f1~lllolll~1 apIJUrtennncl's. TO n AND ~D ~be s premises a!JOve IJRrgailled 01111 described, with the aJlIJtlflellancl'A, Ullto.. ,. .__:::........___.__ he 10111 pRrt~of the ~~~o~a;t: .-- -helM allll Mal~"" forever. AmI ~;:'-~:I=-~_ 0!.g~~ -- "--IJRrt_of lbe Brst art, for sel /. hl'lrs, executors Dlld rulmllllAt,rDlofA, do~ covllllallt, "f11l1t, harlmlll allll Rl!fOO 10 8ud wWt the SAM .tI " ... . ~ ~ nrLV_of lbo sPoolul JlIIrt, Jr.' - , ..~Ip;~ ~, that At th.. time of till! ensenllnl{ nllll .1p.lIvery of thcse IIfO~t'IIIA_._ 1l11161zed of the prl'mIAp.s Above couVI'yed, OR of "00(1, Sllr.., Ilf'frel.t, nhRollllo And InderllMlblc (,AI.ato llf inherlllllll'r., ill law, III rl!O Rimple. aud 1R~~00(1 rlRht, flln power And laIVful authority to Itrant, b/uKnin, APIl 011I1 cnnvey tho ~RIIIll in IIIallllef 01111 fmlll af()f(I~alll. RIIII lhllt lhll lAme are ree 811I1 elenr from all for~er and other grants, bargall\9, sRlns, liollS, loxeA, Rssessmoll!.ll allll IlIclllllhr/lIIces llf whntever klml or IJRture Ollver; ___..______ . .... .._..___ , ,nd the above bargolned premises, In tllll. qulet.llmt peacl'nblo IlosAoARlon of 'the sold JJRrl-rof the secolld flatt, _ _... .___.hdrs Rad RIISlps, gnlnllt all and .eYery penol\l or" pel'llOll1l . law,Eu",. , clalming.l.or to claim the wholo or Dny part theroof, lhe sard prirt__of tile Brst part Ihal1 m] will WARRANT AND FOREVE~ DEFEND. '0. 'If , " IN WITNEBS,.WHEREOF, 'f:Tb" snl<1 pRrL4-ol-tiw.Brst,port ha",,) herr.untb'set ~., 111I\,n d'~" .._R"'d..seal~theIJaYAIIII yeAr rstnbove wrlUen. 0 /"') a - '. /J ....?'\ ....,.)'d ~ D......... I~ I!.r.....ee or .. _ ..(.......(". ,~ (RlIALJ ey--",/t;-T/1 ~ 7/t, ----..-.....---... :::::~ I , - -- [RRAL] . _. - STATE ~ ! om, I, ?f <~~3. _ ~~ ~___ ._____. Nola.,. Pobll" Anl1 for tbe lald__ County In t1:e Blale a~ht7! I~:r~~~__h'_____' .. -.==-~ wbo -/ to me to be tbe person_whose nRme ~ ~...IIlIhscrlbed to tho rorcgoing Deed, apIJCared berore me . this ~ porson Rill] acknowledged that slltnell, senlell and delivered the Inld Instrument of writing as rree and volunlory act, fOJiJ.llo !lses aQd purposes theroln Aet rorlh. / ~ Given und~~'ut nnd..z::...~.r..I'seal, this ::z b day of~??? A. D.19~ My commission expires __ t!..'1,._2....L._r----A. D. loE d ~A".2~ ' --Lf-~~iI..r ~, NoIlJ'" Publlll. " ýÿ .r . . "... j . " 'I> '. "'1 PRASER - WIR'l'BR PAlUt ROADWAY DTWORK PLAlOlZRG Prepared forI . Town of Fraser Town of Winter Park Grand County , ' Prepared by: Felsburg Bolt & Ollevig 5555 DTC Parkway, Suite 2015 Englewood, Colorado 80111 303-779-8248 " October 8, 1986 ~ .... ~ ^,. '-'<"-~~'1 ,,- " . . ~. :~, t.. I 1.0 IR'J.'RODUCTION The Upper Fraser Valley area, centering around the towns of Fraser and Winter Park, offers one of the largest recrea- tional ski and resort complexes in close proximity to the Denver metropolitan area. The popularity of the Winter Park Ski Resort has generated recent residential subdivision de- velopment, and expansion plans at the resort will almost certainly generate considerably more. A good example of this phenomenon is the Regis-Maryvale Village; located halfway between the two towns, the complex offers extensive commer- cial and residential development opportunities. t The Valley's current roadway system is highly dependent upon U.S. 40, the only through route in this vicinity (Figure 1- 1) . External traffic as well as internal traffic to nearby destinations must both utilize, in the majority of cases, u.s. 40. A corresponding network of county maintained roads on either side of U.S. 40 also helps to_distribute traffic, but a lack of connectivity precludes its use for any purpose other than localized travel. Congestion currently occurs on u.s. 40 at peak periods, especially associated with ski area arrivals and departures during the winter season. Future ski resort expansion plans in the vasquez vicinity and the ancillary tourist and residential development-associated with it will strain the ability of the current network to provide the required capacity. The prospect of a Berthoud Pass tunnel, the possibility of major ski area development in the Kopper's vicini ty to the north, and potentia 1 access to the proposed Vasquez ski area via a gondola located at the Regis-Maryvale Village Center may also playa part in the distribution and volume of future traffic. This areawide roadway study analyzes the potential future development impacts upon the roadway system. The report be- gins with an assessment of current conditions and a discus- sion of prior transportation studies completed within the vi- cinity. The following sections describe the analysis method- ology, assumptions, and findings, followed by an examination of some important issues which arise from the study results. The report concludes with a discussion of implementation strategies, a summary of results and recommendations, and some attention to possible future developments which may substantially alter the report's conclusions. '!,' . -1- ýÿ ..,:,J . . The study resulted in a recommended roadway plan for central Winter Park (Figure 2-2) which showed extensions of the local discontinuous street system but, more importantly with re- spect to this study, extensions northward of Alpine Vista Road, Lion's Gate Road, a Leland Creek Road, and the Fraser Valley Parkway. Specific recommendations for U.8.40 in- cluded: 0 0.8.40 should be widened to four through lanes with dual left turn lane from Winter Park Drive (north intersec- , tion) to proposed Leland Creek Road. 0 Up to eight intersections along U.8.40 may require sig- nalization in the future. 0 Q The east s lope side of Berthoud Pass shou ld be widened to three or four through lanes. 0 A bypass corridor should be identified so that right-of- way can be preserved. The U.8.40 ByPass Feasibility Study followed up on the ques- tion of bypassing U.8.40 through central Winter Park. In this analysis, four options were considered: 1) a much longer Fraser Valley Parkway route (about 3 miles in length) located in its entirety on the east side of the U.8.40, exiting south . of the current Beavers development and rejoining the highway in the vicinity of the Grand County Sanitation District's lagoons, 2) a Rio Grande route essentially paralleling the D&RGW's tracks through Winter Park, 3) a Vasquez route which skirted the town's western limits through National Forest and Denver Water Board lands, and 4) a "no build"/improved U.8.40 set of options where the capacity of U.8.40 is improved without new construction taking place. Eight analysis zones were established as part of the study methodology, Zone "F", titled northern developments, included areas of Forest Mea- dows, the Regis-Maryvale development, Village at Winter Park, as well as Winter Park Ranch, but not the town of Fraser itself nor other development areas immediately adjacent to the west and north. After consideration of a number of transportation, economic, and environmental factors, the improved U.8.40 alternative was chosen as the preferred route. From the report: . \ I 'J -10- , . . , "A modified U.8.40 obviously presents the least compli- cated of new route alte~natives since the basic right- of-way is already in place and minimal construction costs (allowing for favorable benefit/cost ratios) are required. Transportation rankings are about average in comparison with other alternatives since a greater pre- ponderance of roadway network is already in place. Eco- nomic and environmental factors are the most favorable among alternatives.- The final study of interest concerns the proposed Berthoud Tunnel Traffic and Revenue Forecasts, prepared by Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quade, and Doug las, Inc., as a preliminary in- I formational document in support of a proposed Berthoud Pass tunne 1 pro ject. The report reviewed current travel charac- teristics over the pass and considered two traffic demand forecasts up to the year 2006, one based on historic traffic I patterns and projected growth and the other on an assessment of the anticipated induced amount of traffic generated by the improved access the tunnel would provide. Part of the study I methodology involved a consideration of the effect that com- pletion of the Eisenhower Tunnel on 1-70 had on traffic volumes accessing the area. I Each of these studies provided a base of information used, in part, as a starting point for this study. The analysis resu 1 ts from each of these studies can be used, as we 11, to I provide a context for comparison with the results of this study, found in Chapter 4, Model Results/Findings. I , I . I \ \ I I ~ I I I I ,.. - \~2- ~ ýÿ '~;;c.,,,,,,,._,,,,,.,..,,...,.*,,'-'I"<,,,,,,<,,,,,~,,,,,,,,,.-,,,,,,,,,."',r,......'-=<>,.~ ..".~,." , .~, " ."""~....:. ~._._~- ------.~--,,-----.,/> ... .., ~ -, . . . , . 3.0 IIO~BLIBG JIftIIODOLOGY ARD ASSUMP!'IORS ~he analysis used for the Praser-winter Park Roadway Network Study has been based, in general, upon data from national travel demand statistics and information available from other Colorado ski areas, in particular, the Aspen-Snowmass and Wolf Creek resorts. Other assumptions regarding local condi- tions were derived from public documents, related planning studies, and discussion with local officials and agency re- presentatives. A summary of the assumptions discussed in this chapter are included in Appendix A-I for quick refer- ence. In general, this analysis concurs with and is based upon the assumptions developed in the 1981Praser Community Plan as follows: 1. The Praser Valley will continue to expand as a major destination recreational area. 2. The Vasquez Ski Area will develop, caUSing a major in- crease in the skier capacity. 3. The second home market will continue to develop as long as the population influx into the Denver metropolitan area remains high. 4. Other winter and summer recreational activities will continue to expand based on the above assumptions plus the economic necessity of developing, over the long run, a year-round economy in order to generate revenues to finance investments. 5. The Town of Winter Park will make a major effort in becoming a destination point for out-of-state visitors, initially during the winter ski season. Commercial development is projected to be of high quality and catering to tourist consumption and entertainment needs. 6. The Town of Praser should focus on developing major service commercial and light industrial activities which serve the expanding recreational industry in the valley, and which either supplement the winter economy or are year-round employment generators. The development of local resident housing and commercial enterprises that serve the growing resident population of the Valley is the primary focus. . " " \ '/) -13- ýÿ , . . 6/4/86, 6/12/86 6/18/86 DARSPORTATIOR ASSUMP'1'IORS/IIB'1'BODOLOGY PRASBR RB'l'WORK STUDY . RBSIDD'lIAL PRODDC!'IOR Por Any MP Unit in Praser Valley: PMP 30' are permanent residences and are 100' occupied, 2.1 persons/unit. . TMP 70' are tourist (2nd home, destination skie~~ and are 80\ occupied, 3.8 persons/unit. Townhomes/condos are both considered MP with no distinction between townhomes being considered as permanent residences and condos as tourist resi- dences for person trip calculations. For Any SP Unit in Praser Valley: (includes P & 0 lands) PSP 60\ are permanent residences and are 100\ occupied; 2.1 persons/unit. TSP 40\ are tourist residences and are 70\ occupied, 5.0 persons/unit. . Botel All rooms 90\ occupied; 2.2 persons/room. Daily Person Trips: PMF/PSP 6.1/person (6.1 - .10 ski trip + 1.00 work trip + . . 5.00 other/commercial trips) TMP/TSP 4.86/person (4.86 - 1.5 ski trips + 3.36 other/com- mercial trips) Assumes that 75' of tourist population ski on any given day, and 5\ of skier population travel to external areas outside of the Praser Valley. 'I; Trip.calcu1ations based upon studies at ski resorts in Snowmass, Wolf Creek, Colorado ~ I ~ 1; . . , E L . . U R I . HOLT .. \ ULLE'. .1 .. \ llil:l:iii:i:l:l: ~ ........ ......... '. ........ ......... ::::::::.....:::::::: '.................... .....,:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: 1 . '\ \ , 4& 4A \ -. ......... . c.. ..... 3 5 {I , - . " . , I I ~_." .I ----- l ,.......". ,... ... .,... . I ~ Figure 3-3 Zone. with Ski Trip Attractions North ~ .< . . SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROJECTION SUMMARIES FRASER ROADWAY S.....UOY Total Residential Units (Zone 1 not included1 treated as external zone) MUlti-Family 18,760 D.U. Single Family 1,250 D.U. Hotel 3,010 Rooms Non-Residential Space Commercial 1,500,000 S.F. Light Industrial 400,000 S.F. Permanent Population Multi-Family 11,820 Persons Single Family 1,610 Persons Total 13,430 Persons Tourist Population Multi-Family 39,920 Persons Single Family 1,750 Persons Hotel 5,960 Persons i Total 47,630 Persons Total Population 61,060 Persons X :; l' ~ x'\ ~~ ~;, , . . - . . Accord~ng to the County Road 5 Development projection and 'l'raff~c Study, an estimated total unit count of 6,022 multi- family and 5,336s1n91e family dwelling units could be built near county Road 5. Por the purposes of this study, it was estimated that a portion of this area could load about 7,000 AD'!' (about a fourth of the total traffic) on CR 5 entering .' praser, calculated by the methodology described earlier. These trips were then distributed throughout the study area in the same manner as the project related trips. Pinally, a number of residents who live in the Praser-Winter Park vicinity may travel out of the study area to work, e.9., Henderson Mine, Granby area, etc. '1'0 a certain extent, this effect would be countered by those who live outside of the study area but travel to work destinations within. Also, a . percentage of winter destination tourists (perhaps as many as 25 percent) may not ski, travelling to either the ski resort base areas for Shopping/dining/entertainment purposes or to other commercial locations, and thereby potentially modifying the other/commercial counts. In either case, these numbers are thought to be of an order of magnitude such that modeling results would probably not vary significantly. -32- .:ii::t; ýÿ .. 1 . . assuming a 10 percent peak hour factor) on 0.S.40 in the vicinity of Vasquez Road, whereas this study anticipated 33,100 in the same general location. Not all segments agree as consistently as these two comparisons due to the fact that both of the prior studies utilized smaller traffic analysis zone systems and both assumed various percentages of bui Id- out projections regarding the developments under considera- tion rather than the full build-out assumed for this analy- sis. I 4.2 Future ConditioDs The analysis summarized by this report has examined the I future bui ld-out conditions as described in Chapter 3.0 re- garding the mode 1 ing deve lopment input factors (TAZ estab- 1 ishment) and as sumpt ions. As such, the model predicts the anticipated volumes to be expected on the network which are I responsive to that particular set of land use and development condi tions. Two specific alternative area projects or plans have been advanced with varying degrees of local speculation I regarding their actual probability of occurrence, both, how- ever, would likely affect the outcome of this analysis and therefore warrant some mention within this context. The two major issues of concern are the prospects of a BerthoUd Pass I tunnel and the development of an additional major ski resort on the Koppers property northeast of the study area. I Development of an additional ski resort complex in the Opper Fraser Valley may be possible with available infrastructure and financial commitment, however, the success of such a I large-scale venture would depend upon the market factors described earlier in connection with potential expansion plans of the currently existing Winter Park Ski area. If this were to be the case and the anticipated development were I to be on the order of that generated by the present Winter Park area, an obvious re-~xamination of the current and projected roadway system outlined in this report (and beyond I its scope) would be required. Clearly, future transportation plans would have to take into account whether or not local roadways could handle the projected traffic demands that this I type of development might generate. As of this writing, a Berthoud Pass Tunnel Funding Authority ,has been established and the groundwork has been laid for I further engineering and feasibility studies, with a potential construction date set as early as 1991. As reported in the Berthoud Tunnel Traffic and Revenue Forecasts StUdy: I I I -3~- ýÿ '~l . . . '~l -It is conceiva~le that the improved access provided by the tunnel may cause a more rapid development of tbe area, and in particular, the praser valley.- . , If this were to be the case, traffic volumes on the Opper praser Valley Road network would certainly increase substan- tially over the levels predicted under this analysis. One only need consider the boon that completion of the 1-70 . tunnels represented for Summit County ski areas to become cognizant of the potential impact this project may have upon East Grand County. In lieu of this development, recommenda- tions resulting from the Berthoud Pass ~raffic Study (pre- pared for the Winter Park Recreational Association in 1982) suggested that the 2-lane east slope side should be widened soon after 1990 by adding, at a minimum, a continuous climb- ing lane for winter ski traffic with the suggestion of 4- lanes total as the best solution. . - . ,.. -39~\' , .. tfQse-v . RRC ASSOCIATES ----...--......--- Resealcr, . P1annlt'lQ . Desogr. TO: Members of the Coordinating Committee FROM: Chris Cares, RRC Associates R.E: Preliminary Findings from the Grand County Survey DATE: June 5. 1996 . Enclosed are preliminary results from the survey conducted by RNL and RRC iri April and May. These results are confidential and preliminary at this time, They will be reviewed at the Coordinating Committee meeting on June 13 and the method of releasing results will also be discussed at that time. We look forward to your input at the meeting; please do not release results prior to that time. In the packet that is attached you will find several graphs portraying results on a series of questions. These graphs have been used to "collapse" a number of questions in a fonnat that will allow easy comparison of results across questions. The typical graph format has two types of information presented: on the right scale is the average or "mean" response in a particular category based on the {~., typical one to five scale that was used on most questions. This result is presented as a line usually running across the top of the graph. On the left is the percent of respondents that gave a category .~ either a "I '. (the lowest rating) or a .. 5" (the highest). Although these types of graphs can be a bit complicated to read at first. we have found that these measures are useful as a means of understanding tile large amount of infomlation contained in the survey. We ask that you look over the graphed results and react to the fomlat and fmdings. While we can present less information on a single graph. it often means mQle graphs which in turn represents an even greater volume of materials. Also, keep in mind that we can prepare other graphs or infonnation summaries as you identify the need. In addition, one of the important considerations in the design of the survey was ensuring the ability to break results down in various ways. The geographicallocation of respondents within the County, the length of residency in the County, and whether the individual owns or rents their home are but three examples of the types of breakdowns that were identified as potentially revealing in terms of "explaining" responses on survey questions. 11lese questions have been crosstabulated with all of the survey questions in the packets of tables that are also included for your use. In the tables the "overall" response is in the first column. with the results from subgroups (such as Krenunling compared to Hot Sulphur Springs. etc,). Again. this is a lot of paper but it also represents a fairly complete snapshot of the total set of data that was collected. We will invite your input on how you want to see these results sununarized and on additional breakdowns you want to have us make. We welcome your feedback. -' ....... 4940 Pearl East Circle . Suilo 103 . Boulder, Colorado 80301 · (303) 449-6556 . (303) 449.6587 FAX -'~ e ce i .~ # I I GRAfID CCIJIITY PLANIIING SURVEY 1996 OVERALL IlHERE DO YOU LIVE i " DEMMLlNG HOT SULPHUR I GRAND lAKEl GlWiBT I TABER'ASH I UP FRASER I UINTER PARt:: & OTHER > PARSHAlL I SHADOW tlTll SILVER tRER HIGJI1.AIlDS I iJlEADOII RIDGE I AREAS AIDUJlI) WIllIAMS fie COllMBllE LAKE YMCA ICEBOX ESTATES HorJ \IIJlD lClJ DESCRIBE THE CONDITION Of YOUR AIEA II GIWID At.OO developed 19% 11% 13% 23X 13% 211 m 18% 34% Just t right U% 37X 48X 41% 42% 49% 42% m 40% Gr_ing nicely 26X 21% m 26% 26X 21% Z8X 35% 191 I coo-ld we sane growth 12% 31X 15% loX 19% 9% 7X 4% ax i' I, VDffa 100% 100% 1001 100x 100% 1ot11 100% tDOl 1001 n 8 2,111 237 124 371 370 246 484 188 53 OVER lAST 3-5 YEARS DEVElOPMENT IN !$RAfI) COUNTY IS: D Too atOll 6X 13% 6X loX ax loX 6X loX 51 , About right 49% 42% 46X 51% 52% 511 41% S9X 341 I, Too fest 391 35X 41X 41X 35X 4tX 411 m 5n No opinion 61 1= 1% 51 51 4X 6X loX 4X fOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100X 100% 100% 1001 n- 2.,122 238 121, 372 369 248 485 190 56 'THE AVAUA8IL1n Of STClRES/aNlERCIAl bEY. IN YOUR AREA IS: LOW._not serve needs 38X 61X 31% 35% SOX 2ft 30% 2ft 32% Abou(. jjht 56% 37X 60X 60X 48% m 61% 611 631 Hig'h-too fiI$ftY stores end COIIIDl!rc:ial ~etopnent 61 2% 2% loX 2% ax 9% 10% 5% TOTAl 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100x 100% 100% 100X na 2,114 239 126 369 369 249 477 189 56 t j . L "';:"'" O~ ~.""'P...r-o. 00." .....<"'........~n.....~ _ 0",,1"0'-' rn T-~'''' -- 1 . . . Table 10 Ilousing Units: 1970-1994 Grand County and Towns 1l0LJSING UNITS PERCENT CHANGE PLACE 1970 1980 1990 191)4 est. 1970-80 1980-90 1990.94 Grand County 1,940 3,915 6,076 6,290 101.8% 55,2% 3.5% (unincorporated) Fraser 9.\ 306 557 561 225.5% 82.0% 0.7% Granby 199 433 -In 510 117.6% 13.6% 3.7% Grand Ll\.ke 297 637 75-1 780 114.5% 18.4% 3.4% Hot Sulphur 109 179 185 191 6.U% 3.'Wi. 3.2% Springs Kremmling 327 .11l4 560 582 48.0~o 15.7% 3.9% Winter Park N.-\ 81 \) 1.361 1.413 .. 66.2% 3. 8~/u Grand County 2.966 6,773 'J,985 10,327 128,4% 47.4% 3.4% Total Sourct;: U.S. Census 01 p')Plll.llion ,111.1 Iluusing, 11)70, 1980, 1'J90; Northwest Colorado Council of Governments for 1994 estimales. Tuble II Grand County Building Permit Activity (1990-1995) Towl13uilding Pcrnlits Issued in 13uih,jing Permits Issut:u for Unincorporated Areas County (Including Towns) # % of County % of Penn its Issued for SFD YEAR Overall Total (New + Additions/Remodels) 1990 .1.17 299 66.9~~ 876% 1991 530 329 62.1% 82.7% 1992 530 355 670% 87.6% 1993 701 ..IW 685'% 95.2% 1994 !101 425 531% 96.2% 1995 llH -191 58.9% 98.0% Source: Grand County Demographic & Economic ReCOnlUlissallce Rl!porl Ciarion Associates Grand County Growlh CvorJi'haioll l'/,m Puge /8 '_'_"-'.-'~- , . . . . l' B. POPULATION TRENDS & PROJECTIONS-KEY FACTS . Historic Trends-Permanent Population: Grand County's population grew more during the 1970's than during the t 980's. During the 1980's. the unincorporated county areas, Fraser, and Winter Park were the only areas to experience positive growth. and then only at very slow paces. On the other hand, Grand Lake, Hot Sulphur Springs, and Kremmling all lost population during the 1980's, while Granby essentially stayed stagnant during the decade. (Table 1) In 1990. according to the Census. more than one.half of all county residents lived in unincorporated areas versus in the various towns. (Table 1) Table I . . Resident Population (1970.1990) Grand County and Towns . Resident Population Percent Change Annualized Growth Rate PLACE 1970 1980 1990 1970-80 1980.90 1980-1990 Grand County 3.152 3,4 79 4,125 10.4% 18.6% 1.7% (unincorporated) Fraser 221 470 57S 112.7% 22.3% 2,0% Granby 554 963 966 73.8% 0.3% O.O~'O Grand Lake 189 382 259 102.1% -32.2% -3.8% 1I0t Sulphur Springs 220 405 347. 84.1% -14.3% -1.5% Kremmling 764 1.296 1,166 69.6% -10.0% -1.1% Wlntu Park N/A 480 528 -- 10.0% 1.0% Grand County Total 5.100 7,475 1,966 46.6% 6.6% 0.6% Source: U.S. Census of Population and Housing, 1970. 1980. 1990. . 1990-1994.. Permanent Population Growth: Total county population for, 1990 was 7,966 persons. By 1994, the state demographer estimated that the county's population had grown by close to 10% to about 8,700 persons-a gain of740 persons in 4 years or about 2.1 % per year-slightly slower growth than the rest of the state. which averaged 2.5% annual population growth during the same time. Grand County grew at significantly slower rates between 1990 and 1994 than the other Colorado northwest ski counties. For example. Eagle County grew at 5.3% annually and Summil CoWlly grew 5.6% annually between 1990 and 1994. (Tables 2 & 4) Demographic & Economic Reconnai.rsance Report Clarion Associates Grand County Growth Coordination Nan Page ., , ýÿ , . . . . . Table J Population Projections: 1995-2020 Grand County . ..... '. . .....,.. {. I\Wlltfif Average %Ch,lJtge .... -.... 1995 2000 :2010 2{}20 [L . .' . . 199.5~OO. ..... 2000. to 2010-20 ';. - .' Grand County 8,976 10.205 12,532 14,633 ". 2.60 2.08 1.56 Region 12 86,520 99.275 120,787 140,387 2.79 1.98 '. 1.52 COLORADO 3,720,512 .~.O 18,30c) 4.548.240 5,C)i\ 8.892 1.55 1.25 . /.05 Source: Coloraua Division of L()eal (iovemltlCnl. Deltlogmphic Section (November and December 1994) . Table 4 r()pU In! ion Estimates and rlCljections: 1990.2000 Grnnd County and Towns [?t'sidcnl Populalion Percent Change A verage Annual Growth Rale PLACE 1990 19(H 2000 1990- 1994- 1990- 1994-2000 1994 2000 1994 ., Grand COllnt)' ,I. I::! 5 .1,:'2-' nia 9.7% nia 2.1% rlla (unincorporated) Fraser 575 626 nla 8.9% nia 2.2% nJa Granby 966 1.058 n:a C).5~;' n a 1.5% nia Grand Lake 259 276 n:" 6.6% nin 2.2% n/a Ifot Sulphur )-17 J80 n/" 9.5% nla 2.2% nla Springs Kremmling 1,166 1,280 n/a 9.8% nla 1,5% nla Winter Park 528 562 nl" 6.4% n/r. 2.2% ilia GRANI> COUNTY 7,%6 S.706 IO.:W5 9.)% 17.2% 2.1% 2.9'% TOTAL - . Colorado 3,294,(~ 73 3.655,647 4,018.J09 11.0% 9,9% 2.5'l.o 1.7% Sources: U.S. Census of Population and Ilousing, 1990; and Demogmphy Section oflhe Colorado Division of Local Govenllnents for 1994 estimates and 2000 projections. -. -~~- lJemograflhic.: &. &mmmiq flq(J.(j]nm;JiitlMmt<C ~ (GP1fBIiJ(tC~M~...rl\Ji1r~rt/ltl'CCOlrwdlil!lPi.tltif/(fY"'1-!li'liifJl/Ifl GRAND CIIIIlTY PLAIftIlffIi SURVEY 1996 OVERAll WERE DO 'IOU LIVE QEIIClIIIG HOT SUlPHUR I GRAND LAKEI GRAIIBY I TABER~SR I UP FIllSER I VI litER PARK & OTHER PARSHALL I SHADOW 1"'1/ SILVER CREEK HIGIlLAttDS I MEADOII RIDGE I AREAS AR~ VlLLlAMS Ft COLUMBINE tAlE YMCA ICEBOX ESTATES . . RATE TRAfFt~ SJTUATlON:~1t l' - 1 -.eriOUS problllll8 .-- \ 3SX \' m m 4'IX 2ax m l m . 1- 351 38X 2. r _,_ ..,:In m ... ... :In I... ... ZOI 3 _ pe.k hour problema \ .., m ... m .., 6" i '" \ \ m ... 6 . ..,.... _'''' , 51 I .. ... 31: 51 .. " . I" .. I \ \ \ i . ' . 1 .OTAl i....!.... ,... .... ,... .... - \ \ 100x I 100x n . l ',"'" '02 .. 2!f1 326 245 6111 \ .65 50 -' - RATE TRAffiC SITUATION: GRANST . . .. _,.... _'''' ...... SO> m 52l< ... 6lll ... ... 2 .0'''', .......... ... m ... m m ... 3" :In m 3 . ,eak ...., ......... .. ,.. ..,51'''' " .. .. 51 4 . ..".... _,.... .................. TOTAL ........,... ,... .... ,... .... .... .... n . ',6" '" 105 316 358 195 326 114 63 ~~ ot ~ ~ " Source: RRC Ass ..!-es _ Boulder. CO . T-14b ...., .,ii. GRAND CQlNTy PlAIrNUfG SUR~T 1996 ,', OVERALL IIJIEIE DO '00 Live . I QE.....,ffG HOT SULPHUR / GRAND lAKE/ GIW8f I TAlERIIASR I '" FRAsER / IIINTER PAU & OYIlEI --- - ~ . , PARSIIAl.l / SIlADOII NTI/ SILVER CRfEr HIGJllMDS I MEADCII RIDGE I AREAs MOUlD I WILLIAMS Fr COUItBlffE LAKE na ICEBOx ESTATES RATe SERVICES/FACILITIES: TRAFFIC I : I CIRCUlATION ; " ; 1 . Poor 7% 4% ]X 6X 51 9X IX lOX 10E j 2 14% 6X 9X 15% ft 161 lOX 241 10S 3 45% 42% 451 45% 431 47% 4ft '6X m , 26X 3ft 2ft 2ft 351 lOX 1ft 151 35% bcel lent IX lOX 161 7% ft ft 4% 'I I" -, : ' I j TOTAL 1001 100X 100X 100X 1001 100X 100X 1001 1001 / Aver-life 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.8 3.3 I n- 2,011 224 109 358 352 m 469 114 48 I RAT[ SERVICES/FACIUTlES: PEDESTRIAN & i BICYCLE CIRCULATION 1 - Poor ft 111 61 lOX ft 7% 61 41 61 2 161 12% 191 22% 191 IS1 12% 131 14% 3 361 40X 34X 37% 'OX 35% 311 31% 421 , 311 2ft 251 22% 26X 301 40X 38% 26% 5 - Excellent 101 ax 151 8% 61 131 lOX 141 121 .TAl 100X 1001 1001 100% 100% 100x 100X 100% 100% Average 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.2 n - 1,991 221 108 353 345 Z2S 474 182 SO -- .~. . . , , , 24 May 96 Sourc:e: RRC Assoc:iates . Boulder. CO r.S5b , ~._,.. , , GRAND CClINTY PLANNING SURVEY 1996 OVERALL WERE DO TOO LIVE DEIIIUIG HOT SULPHUR , GIWlD LAKE, GIAI8Y I TABERIfASH , lIP FRASER I WllltER PAIl .. OTHER PARSHALL , SHADfAlMTN/ 51 L VEl CREEK HIGHLANDS / MEADCII RIDGE I AREAS AROUND WILLIAMS FK COLtItBIIE LAKE YMCA ICEBOX ESTATES WIlIeR IMPROVEMENTS WOULD YCIJ LIKE TO SEE 111 YCUt AREA Widen ....ttr" roads 491 521 521 40S '6S 501 561 511 492: Incr.... pbllc trIMtt,lntercept parking 441 241 25% ." IoU 521 581 471 361 Encou....eeerpool i.... 271 211 24% 22X 301 28X m 231 20X Make no ..jor changes in existing roads 251 311 30X 38X 251 211 171 1as 35% Buildeddltionel roads to disperse traffIc m 61 11% lOX 161 36X 3ft m 241 Other 211 24% 16% 16% m m m 24% 20X Establish stricter perking control. 6% 3% 41 71 91 91 41 31 7X Restrict vehIcular eccess to .jor roads 31 2% 1% 4% 2X n 41 2% 4X TOTAL t99'X 1641 161X 1m 1941 221% 234% 2041 195% ~ n= 2,108 238 122 367 366 247 .486 192 55 , < , . ..~ . 24 "BY 96 !\ !; , t- , Source: RRC Aslt~;"~.8tes . Boulder. CO .. . . GRAND IXlJIIn PLAIIltlG SURVEY 1996 OVERALL UllERE DO YOU LIVE ICREJItLIIG HOT SULPHUR I GRAIID lAKE, GRAIIBY I T~ , UP FRASER I UIITER PAK & Of II!! PARSHALL / SHADDII MTI/. 51 L VEl ClEEK HIGHLAIlDS , MEADOU RIDGE / AREAS AIlCIIIID WILLIAMS fit COLUNBIIE LAKE. YMCA I CEBOX ESTATES RATE SERVICES/FACILITIES: PARKS , . Poor 5% 10% 51 21 3% as 41 6'1 61 ax 101 41 31 ax 11X 131 SZ 6X 2ft 35% :sax 191 341 281 m 24X 2SX 4 31% 2ft Z9l 301 321 341 281 m m 5 . Exeellent 26% 15X 251 4ft m 191 221 28 27% TOTAL 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 100S 100x tOOl - Average 3.7 3.3 3.7 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.7 n - 2.001 229 111 366 357 225 454 177 52 I RATE SERVICES/FACiliTIES: FIRE , PROTECTlOI 1 - Poor 21 51 101 11 11 ZI. m: 11 61 2 3% loX 10% ZI 21 4% 11 2l 41 3 19% 16% 26% 20X 21% m 15% 11% 201 4 37% l8% 38X 37% 351 391 40S 311 33% . Exeellent 39% 3U 16% 40% 411 m 43% 491 371 TOTAL 100% 1001 1001 100S 100S 1001 1001 ,. 1001 Averllge 4.1 4.0 3.4 4.1 4.1 3.9 4.3 4.2 3.9 n- 1.946 231 115 348 342 227 435 162 51 < ! ; I I I I ~ 24' May 96 ,/P ''t, 11'1, Source: flRC AS . ~tes - Boulder. CO 11'-4[3