Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout101 North Beacon_Developers Conf_Stormwater Summary_051019Hydrologic Analysis 101 North Beacon Street, Watertown, MA (Parcel ID 907-22-0) Project Summary The project proponent, 101 North Beacon, LLC. proposes to redevelop one (1) parcel of land located at 101 North Beacon Street in Watertown, Massachusetts. The proposed redevelopment will consist of 28 multi -family residential units in a three (3) story building with access drives, stormwater management systems including infiltration basins and subsurface infiltration systems, utilities and other related infrastructure ("The Project"). The Project will be located on one (1) parcel shown on the Town of Watertown Assessor's Map 907 as Parcel ID 907-22-0 with an aggregate area of 0.73 acres (31,662 S.F.) ("The Site"). The Site is bounded by North Beacon Street to the north, Ladd Street to the west, Irving Street to the east, and developed residential property to the south as shown on Figure 1 — USGS Locus Map. The Project will access the existing utility infrastructure located on Irving Street and Ladd Street, including sanitary sewer, water, electric, telephone and cable television. The proposed stormwater management systems will be designed to fully comply with all standards of the Department of Environmental Protection's Stormwater Management Regulations and will utilize an on -site subsurface infiltration system and an infiltration basin to mitigate peak rates of runoff. The existing and proposed site conditions are illustrated on the project site plans entitled "Site Design Plans, 101 North Beacon Street, Watertown, MA", Prepared by McKenzie Engineering Group, Inc. May 10, 2019. This report contains stormwater runoff calculations for the pre -development and post - development conditions and includes the sizing of proposed stormwater best management practices (BMPs). All stormwater management facilities will be designed to mitigate peak rates of runoff, provide renovation of stormwater and meet the requirements of the DEP's Stormwater Management Regulations. Pre -Development Condition The Site is located within the Town of Watertown's Limited Business (LB) Zoning District. The majority of the 101 North Beacon Street parcel is comprised of a commercial buildings with associated parking lot and equipment storage areas. The existing building will be razed prior to construction. Refer to Figure 4 — Aerial Photograph. The existing topography generally ranges in elevation from approximately 24 ft. (NAVD 1988) at the middle and east side of the site adjacent to the building, to elevation 22 at the western side of the site. The Site generally slopes from the middle of the site toward the streets located to the east, west, and north. Review of available environmental databases such as MassGIS reveals that the Site is not located within a mapped Natural Heritage Endangered Species Area (refer to Figure 5 — 11Page NHESP Map), FEMA Flood Zone (refer to Figure 2 — FEMA Flood Map), or a Zone II Wellhead Protection Area. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has identified the soil on the site as 602, Urban Land with no hydrologic soil group (HSG) included in the description (refer to Figure 3 — NRCS Soils Map). Hydrologic soil group "D" was assumed for infiltration calculations due to the hydrologic soil group of the surrounding soils.. The pre -development watershed area analyzed in this report is comprised of approximately 0.75 acres which includes the Site and a portion of offsite tributary areas to the south. The watershed consists of three (3) subcatchment areas (1S, 2S & 3S) and three (3) Design Points (DP -1, DP -2, & DP -3). Refer to the Pre -Development Watershed Plan WS -1 in Appendix A for a delineation of drainage subcatchments for the pre - development design condition. The SCS Technical Release 20 (TR-20) and Technical Release 55 (TR-55) method based program "Hydrocad" was employed to develop pre- and post -development peak rates of runoff and volumes. Drainage calculations were prepared for the pre -development condition for the 2, 10, 25 and 100 -year, Type III Storm events. Refer to Appendix A for computer results, soil characteristics, cover descriptions and times of concentrations for all subareas. Post -Development Condition The proponent proposes a 28 -unit redevelopment. The Project will consist of a 31,662 S.F. (GFA) building with supporting site infrastructure including sidewalks, access drives, stormwater management systems, and utilities. The Project will access existing utility infrastructure located on Irving Street and Ladd Street including sanitary sewer, water, electric, telephone and cable television. Roof runoff produced by the constructed building will be captured by internal drains and conveyed to a proposed subsurface infiltration system located in underneath the proposed parking lot. In both the pre -development and post -development condition, an approximate watershed area of 0.75 acres was analyzed. The objective in designing the proposed drainage facilities for the Project was to maintain existing drainage patterns to the extent practicable and to ensure that the post -development rates of runoff are equal to or less than pre -development rates. Refer to Proposed Watershed Delineation Plan WS -2 in Appendix B for a delineation of the post -development drainage subareas. The design points for the post -development design conditions correspond to those analyzed for the pre -development design condition. All design points are shown on Plan No. WS -2. Subsurface Infiltration System Runoff from subcatchment 4S, runoff from the western portion of the proposed parking lot as well as roof runoff produced from the proposed building will be captured in a subsurface infiltration chamber system shown as pond 1P on Plan No. WS -2. The stormwater will be infiltrated into the surrounding soil without an overflow to the municipal drainage system located on Ladd Street. The subsurface infiltration chamber system was designed to accommodate peak flow generated by all storms up to the 100 - year storm event. Refer to the site plans for the drainage system design. All BMPs shall 2IPage be supported by a comprehensive Construction Phase Pollution Prevention Plan and Erosion Control Plan and Post -Development BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan. Bioretention Area Runoff from subcatchment 5S, produced by the eastern portion of the proposed parking lot and surrounding buffer will be captured in a bioretention pond shown as pond 2P on Plan WS -2. The stormwater produced by the eastern portion of the parking area will flow through a peastone diaphragm filter strip located at a curb break. The combination of the peastone diaphragm filter strip and bioretention area allows for 90% Total Suspended Solids (TSS) removal. Stormwater will then flow through the soil media in the bioretention area before it is infiltrated into the soil below. Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP's) Treatment stream for the Phase I development shall consist of deep sump hooded catch basins, a first defense unit, subsurface infiltration system and a bioretention pond with pretreatment to achieve the required removal of a least 80% of the total suspended solids (TSS) and mitigate the anticipated pollutant loading. Refer to the TSS Removal Worksheets in Appendix D for TSS removal rates. Erosion and Siltation Control Silt sock erosion control barriers will be placed where indicated on the plans prior to the commencement of any construction activity. The integrity of the silt sock erosion control barrier will be maintained by periodic inspection and replacement as necessary. The silt sock erosion control barrier will remain in place until the first course of pavement has been placed and all side slopes have been loamed and seeded and vegetation has been established. Operation and Maintenance Plans including pollution prevention and erosion and sedimentation controls will be prepared in conjunction with the final construction plans as required by the DEP Stormwater Management Regulations and NPDES. Compliance with Stormwater Management Standards Standard 1 — No New Untreated Discharges The site development is designed so that new stormwater conveyances do not discharge untreated pavement runoff into, or cause erosion to, wetlands. Standard 2 — Peak Rate Attenuation In the pre -development and post -development stormwater analysis, the watershed area analyzed was approximately 0.75 acres consisting of the subject parcels to be developed and offsite tributary areas. Refer to the Pre -Development Watershed Plan WS -1 for a delineation of drainage subareas for the pre -development design condition and refer to Post -Development Watershed Plan WS -2 for a delineation of drainage subareas for the post -development design condition. Drainage calculations were performed by employing SCS TR-20 methods for the 2, 10, 25, and 100 -year Type III storm events. Refer to Appendix A and B for computer results. The stormwater management systems were designed to accommodate peak flows generated by a 100 -year storm event. 3IPage The peak rates of runoff and volumes for the pre -development condition are as follows: Design Point 2 Year Storm 10 Year Storm 25 Year Storm 100 Year Storm (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) Ladd St. (DP -1) 1.20 1.79 2.10 2.57 N. Beacon St. (DP -2) 0.64 0.96 1.13 1.38 Irving St. (DP -3) 0.48 0.71 0.84 1.02 Design Point 2 Year Storm 10 Year Storm 25 Year Storm 100 Year Storm (AC -FT) (AC -FT) (AC -FT) (AC -FT) Ladd St. (DP -1) 0.092 0.139 0.164 0.201 N. Beacon St. (DP -2) 0.049 0.074 0.088 0.108 Irving St. (DP -3) 0.037 0.056 0.066 0.081 The peak rates of runoff and volumes for the post -development condition are as follows: Design Point 2 Year Storm 10 Year Storm 25 Year Storm 100 Year Storm (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) (CFS) Ladd St. (DP -1) 0.12 0.21 0.26 0.34 N. Beacon St. (DP -2) 0.18 0.30 0.36 0.45 Irving St. (DP -3) 0.13 0.21 0.26 0.32 Design Point 2 Year Storm 10 Year Storm 25 Year Storm 100 Year Storm (AC -FT) (AC -FT) (AC -FT) (AC -FT) Ladd St. (DP -1) 0.009 0.015 0.019 0.025 4 Page N. Beacon St. (DP -2) 0.013 0.021 0.026 0.033 Irving St. (DP -3) 0.010 0.016 0.019 0.024 Comparisons between pre -development and post -development calculations indicate that post -development peak rates of runoff and volumes are less for all design points. Refer to site plans for the drainage system design. All BMPs shall be supported by a comprehensive Construction Phase Pollution Prevention and Erosion Control Plan and Post -Development BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan. Standard 3 — Groundwater Recharge Runoff will be infiltrated by both a subsurface infiltration system, and bioretention pond, which will meet the Stormwater Guidelines for infiltration: • Infiltration structures will be a minimum of two (2) feet above seasonal high groundwater. • Utilize the "Simple Dynamic" method for sizing the storage volume, which takes into account the fact that stormwater is exfiltrating from the infiltration basin at the same time that the basin is filling. • Hydraulic conductivity are based on soil data from the Geotechnical Report and values developed from Rawls, Brakensiek and Saxton, 1982, Estimation of Soil Water Properties, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, vol.25, no. 5. • Refer to Appendix D for infiltration and drawdown calculations and Appendix F for soil data. Groundwater Recharge Volume Stormwater System Soil Type Target Depth Factor (F) (in) Total Impervious Area (sf) Required Recharge Volume (cf)1 Provided Recharge Volume (cf)2 D 0.10 20,908 210 1P (Subsurface Infiltration) D 2,756 2P (Bioretention Pond) D 1,826 210 4,582 1. Required Recharge Volume = Target Depth Factor X Impervious Area (d+Kt) [Simple dynamic method] 2. Provided Recharge Volume = Volume Provided from Bottom of System to peak elevation The subsurface infiltration system will provide both water quality treatment and recharge. Per Standard 4, Water Quality, the BMP must be sized to treat or hold the Target Volume, the larger of the Required Water Quality Volume and the Required Recharge Volume. The Required Water Quality Volume is based on the half -inch of runoff and the Required Recharge Volume is based on 0.10 -inches (Soil Type D); 0.10 inches if greater than 0.50 inches, therefore the Target Volume is the Required Recharge 5IPage Volume of 210 cubic feet. Refer to Appendix D supplemental calculations. The proposed bioretention pond has been designed to completely drain within 72 hours. Refer to the peak rates of runoff and volumes table for the post -development condition for groundwater recharge of 2, 10 & 25 -year storms The drawdown analysis is based on the required recharge volume exfiltrating at the Rawls Rates based on the soil textural analysis conducted at the proposed exfiltration location. Standard 4 — Water Quality The Long -Term Pollution Prevention Plan has been incorporated into the Post -Development Operation and Maintenance Plan. Refer to Appendix E for BMP Operation and Maintenance Plans. The stormwater management system design calls for the installation of 4' -deep sump catch basins with hooded outlets to collect runoff from the western half of the proposed parking area as well as roof runoff. This runoff will then be treated by a first defense unit and conveyed to the subsurface infiltration system. Stormwater runoff from the eastern half of the parking area will sheet flow into a bioretention pond and will be pretreated by a peastone diaphragm. Removal rates for all paved surfaces are: Deep Sump Catch Basins 25% Propriety Devices (First Defense Unit) 70% Subsurface Infiltration System 80% Bioretention Pond w/Pretreatment 90% The drainage system will be designed to comply with the Standards of the DEP Stormwater Management Policy. A treatment stream consisting of deep -sump catch basins with hooded outlets and a first defense unit will ensure that the 95% TSS removal (total suspended solids) is removed prior to discharge to the infiltration facilities and to ensure that 80% TSS removal is accomplished. Runoff directed to the bioretention pond will be treated by a filter strip, 90% TSS removal will be achieved. The proposed treatment stream will renovate the stormwater and improve the water quality by promoting the settlement of sediments and pollutants before runoff is released into the existing drainage system. Refer to Appendix D for TSS Removal Calculation Worksheets. Water Quality Volume Required vs. Volume Provided Stormwater System Impervious Contributing Area (ft2) Required Water Quality Volume' (ft3) Provided Water Quality Volume (ft3) 1P (Subsurface Infiltration) 17,476 728 2,756 2P (Bioretention Pond) 3,432 143 1,826 1. Required Water Quality Volume = Impervious Area (sq.ft) X (0.50") X (lft/12") Standard 5 — Land Use with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPL) The proposed project is not considered a land use with higher potential pollutant loads. 6IPage Standard 6 — Critical Areas The proposed project does not lie within a critical resource area. Standard 7 - Redevelopments and Other Projects Subject to the Standards only to the maximum extent practicable The proposed project is considered a mix of new development and redevelopment project and as such meets the Stormwater Management Standards to the maximum extent practicable. Standard 8 — Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control A detailed Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be included in the Design Plan Set prior to the commencement of construction activity. The project will require a Construction General Permit and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be prepared prior to commencement of construction activities that will result in the disturbance of one acre of land or more. A Construction Phase BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan has been provided as a basis for the SWPPP. Refer to Appendix E. Standard 9 — Operation and Maintenance Plan The Long -Term Operation and Maintenance Plan is provided in Appendix E. Standard 10 — Prohibition of Illicit Discharges To the best of the applicant's knowledge, no illicit discharges exist on site and no illicit discharges are anticipated. Measures to prevent illicit discharges are included in the Long -Term O&M Plan. 7IPage