HomeMy Public PortalAboutTBP 1997-08-20
. e
T~WN OF FRASER
~'Icebox of the Nation"
P.O. Box 120/153 Fraser Avenue
Fraser, Colorado 80442
(970) 726-5491
FAX Line: (970) 726-5518
TOWN BOARD AGENDA: REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 20, 1997,7:30 p.m.
1. : Roll call
2. ,Approval of 8/06/97 minutes
I '
!
3. . Open Forum
i a) Deb DeLap, Grand Futures
b) Todd Gold or Barry Hooker, Village at Winter Park Ranch development
c) Others
,
4. :8:00 p.m. Liquor License Hearing: Chamber of Commerce "Fallfest" request
!
5. Action Items (10 minutes) .
! t a) . . .'. ' ',SubdiVISion bxemption Plat: St. Bernard's Catholic Church l 'tNt' ;1
I
I
6. 'Discussion Items (30 minutes)
a) . Uniform Traffic Code
b) Paving/Hard Surfacing engineering proposal
7. :Staff Choice (30 minutes)
a) Fraser Mustang update
b) "Cost Recovery" infrastructure abJfeements
c) Growth Coordination Plan '\).."" -e,;i 'tC-
d) Other
-r~ ~-r~
8. Board Member's Choice (ulltimed) ~,.lJ4 ~
a) CTN Ballot Measure (Becky)
b) Other
Upcoming MeJtings
August 20th: I Town Board regular meeting
August 27th: Grand County gowth coordination meeting at SilvefCreek M I'll- :) (3)
September 3rd; Town Board regular meeting
i
ýÿ
I
- --
~
T~I~~!e~~~R i
i
P.O. Box 120/153 Fraser Avenue
Fraser, Colorado 80442
(970) 726.5491
FAX Line: (970) 726-5518
MANAGER'~ BRIEFING, AUGUST 15, 1997
I
Augghhh! The. ides of August! Already? Its not fair, not fair, not fair. Be that as it may, the fun
continues. . .
Leo Eisel and" possibly Ron McLaughlin, will be at Ollr workshop which begins at 6:30. Leo
and Ron will discuss three issues i
. Fr~ser' s water rights I
. Fras.er's water portfolio, and
. Fr~ser's water rights and portfolio in relationship with the Maryvale development.
I
Then, the regllllar meeting fun begins with an Open Forum presentation by Deb DeLap from
Grand Futuresiand Todd Gold and/or Harry Hooker may be present to discuss well and septic use
for a new devdlopment on the property that the Barn Store and Cactus Needle sit upon. [told
Todd and Han;y that staffwouldurgue against the proposed well and septic use, but that they had
the right to appeal directly to the Board.
I
The Chamber pf Commerce has asked us to approve al temporary liquor license for their Fraser
Fallfest Celebiration. . .
,
St Bernard's Catholic Church will (finally) hopefully be getting their subdivision exemption
approved whidhgrants them their very own five acresl
During discussion items, we'll consid~r an amendment to the Fraser Town Code that will enact
the new and inlproved model traffic code. We'll discuss the proposed ordinance on Wednesday
and, if you're amiable, you can set a public hearing to consider its formal adoption on 9/17/97.
Then we'll talk about what needs to be done in order to prepare for taking the bond issue to
voters next ApJil. Both ofthese items have information in the packet.
I have a few it~ms to report and receive feedback-on under staff's choice and Becky wants to
discuss a proposed ballot initiative (see the enclosed ntaterials). Finally, you'll have the chance
I "". ," .
to talk the rest iof the night! !!
Have a grandiQse weekendl
ýÿ
e e
TO: TOWN BOARD
QATE: August 14, 1997
We received a phone call today from Scott McInnis' office that he has scheduled a
meeting on Wednesday, August 20th at the Winter Park Town Hall at 5:00 p.lll. to
answer questions from the community and provide information as requested. His
office asked that we advise our trustees.
ýÿ
e e
TOWN BOARD & PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 6,1997
WORKSHOP
WORK SHOPI MARYV ALE
6:00 p.m. ; Town Board present were Mayor Jenscn, Havens, McIntyre, Swatzell,
Sanders a~d Klanckc. Planning Commission present were Shapiro, Rantz and Coulson.
StafT prcsJnt were Reid, Skclton, Winter and Stone. Rcpresenting Maryvalc were Rich
Nipert anq JetT Kirkendall.
I
Reid gave la brief history of the development and the task that has been going on over the
I
past 2 I12!' ears is the request from the Town Board that Maryvale reduce the densities
that were riginally approved in 1986. V ariousideas ( see attached sheet) were
presented 0 the Board from Maryvale as a cost savings that would result in the developers
wing able to reduce densities. This meeting is 10 go over lhe various ideas presented to
see if the ~oard could agree and at that point Maryvale will be able to submit the
applicatioftor the newPDD.
Maryvale tepresentatives showed the densities that were devised using various ideas. j
Also as defnonstrated onthe preliminary drawings they have taken the Parkway, Rec.
Center and Clubhouse out of the Meadow and muIitfamily development out of the
Meadow at 7W.
i
Affordablti Housing was discussed as the developers will need to address this in the new
plan. Imfact study was discussed.
I
Lengthy di!scussion was held on the plan and thc various options, and the decussion was
recessed uptil a tew items on the regular meeting agenda could be considered.
7:30 p.m. !OPEN REGUI..AR MEETING
Minutes of the 7/16/97 meeting were approved as written.
OPEN FORUM
Bob Caravano requested a lettcr of support for a multi-use In-line hockey/skate park. Thc
facility is *eking grant money from GOCO as well as support financially from the other
governmelltal entities to build the project. McIntyre made a motion to send a letter of
support fotthis facility, 2nd Havens, carried.
Catherine ~oss gave the Chamber update.
ýÿ
e e
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Mcintyre reviewed the Headwater Trails Assoc, with regards to Board/statf relations.
Mcintyre is concerned with the organization as it is set up and is concerned that stan'is
not accoufltable. McIntyre would like that the Mayor- Managers meeting discuss this
organization.
Ross Libenson infonned the Board that the Cemetery Assoc. is getting surveys done that
identity the "view corridor" and cemetary entry. The Board determined that decisions on
P A 28 willi. be made at a later date.
MARYV lLE'DISCUSSION CONTINUED
I
Mayor JO,"ston asked for audience comments.
Havens mpved to go into an executive session to discuss points of negotiation, 2nd
Sanders, carried.
Havens moved to come out of Executive session, 2nd Swatzell, carried.
Mayor Johnston asked each Board member to comment to the plan and the tools that help
reduce densities. The consensus of the Board was to direct the Maryvale Developers to
I
pursue Ph.~n "A", but commenting to the list of7 items that help reduce densities, (see
attached sheet) NO.5 is out and No.4 issue could be agreed to only as detennined not
detrimental to the Wells as will be determined by the wellhead Protection Plan that the
Town is working on and only tu allow septic to the highest standards.
STAFFqHOICE
Reid cJaritied that with regards to the Clinton Water Agreements, the 5.5 acre feet of
water we had detennined to be delivered to Williams Fork will is not able tu be moved for
delivery to any other location. Board was comfortable with that decision.
I
Reid infonned the Board that the new water project does not include putting well 8 & 9
on line. That will have to be another prqject. Engineers have absorbed some costs on the
project with some engineering mistakes. l\.-1cLaughlin engineers will be invited to the
next meet~ng to review our water rights.
Board approved fixing the roof at the Rec. Dist. administrative otlice building.
Reid discussed that the new owners of the Barn Store property has approached the Town
with a proposal to build a 3rd building on the property and have asked to be allowed tu
hook into the existing septic and well located their. Havens made a motion to deny any
tit e
more use at the property unless they hook into water and sewer service from WPW, 2nd
McIntrye.: carried.
BOARD CHOICE
Havens and Klancke briefed the Board on a Merchant's Assocoiation meeting of tenants
of the Fraser Valley Center.
No further business, meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
ýÿ
e e
NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING
Public notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the Board of
Trqstees oftbe Town of Fraser, Colorado. on ~.~~~ \1--1 ('1'i.1 , 1997, at~~~_~. p.m.,
in the Town Board Room of the Fraser Town Hall, located at 153 Fraser Avenue, Fraser,
Colorado, for purposes of considering a proposed ordinance, which, among other things, would
adopt by reference the Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities, 1995 Edition, provide
penalties for violations thereof, and amend the penalty provisions applicable to violations of the
Town's snowmobile regulations to provide that such violations are noncriminal infractions
subject to civil penalties.
The Model Ttaffic Code for Colorado Municipalities, 1995 Edition, is published by the
Colorado Department of Transportation, Staff Traffic and Safety Projects Branch, 4201 East
Arkansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222. The subject matter of the Model Traffic Code
relates primarily to comprehensive traffic control regulations for the Town. The purpose of the
proposed ordi,nance an~ the Code adopted therein is to provide a system of traffic regulations
consistent wi~h state law and generally confonning to similar regulations throughout the state
and the natio~.
I
Copier of the Code proposed to be adopted together with the proposed ordinance are on
file and are alailable for public inspection during nonnal business hours in the office of the
Town Clerk, 53 Fraser Avenue, Fraser, Colorado.
!
DATED at the Town of Fraser, Colorado, this day of ,
1997.
By or4er of the Board of Trustees.
Virginia Winter, Town Clerk
Published in the Winter Park Manifest.
First publicatipn:
Final publication: ~"'~~~_~_~.~"_'.P.""
ýÿ
e e
TOWN OF FRASER
ORDINANCE NO. -
AN ORDINANCE FOR THE REGULATION OF TRAFFIC BY THE TOWN OF FRASER,
COLORADO; ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE] 995 EDITION OF THE MODEL TRAFFIC
CODE FOR COLORADO MUNICIPALITIES; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT THEREWITH; PROVIDING PENAL TIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF; AND
AMENDING THE PENAL TIES APPLICABLE TO VIOLATIONS OF THE TOWN'S
SNOWMOBILE REGULATIONS.
WHEREAS, Section 42-4-11O(1)(b), Colorado Revised Statutes, authorizes the Town to
adopt by reference all pr part of a model municipal traffic code; and
WHEREAS, on April 5, 1978, by Ordinance No. 71, the Town adopted by reference the
1977 edition of the Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities; and
WHEREAS, a 1995 revised edition of the Model Traffic Code for Colorado
Municipalities has been prepared to reflect recodification of the State vehicle and traffic laws;
and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the public safety and welfare of the residents of
the Town to adopt the 1995 edition of the Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities; and
WHEREAS, the Colorado General Assembly has provided for the decriminalization of
certain traffic offenses by the removal of jail as a potential penalty; and
WHEREAS, it is the opinion ofthe Town Board of Trustees that many violations of
Town traffic ordinances would be more efficiently handled as noncriminal infractions rather
than misdemeanors or petty offenses, thereby allowing the Municipal Court to hear the matter
without a jury; and
WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the Board of Trustees that violations of the Town's
ordinances regulating snowmobiles should likewise be treated as noncriminal infractions;
WHEREAS. the Board of Trustees finds and determines that this Ordinance is necessary
for the public health, safety and welfare.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN
OF FRASER, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
1
tit e
PART 1: AMENDMENT OF TOWN CODE. Chapter 9 (Traffic), Articles 9-1 (ModelTraffic
Code) and 9~3(Snowmobiles), of the Code of the Town of Fraser, Colorado (herein sometimes
referred to as the "Town Code") are hereby amended as follows:
U Section 9-1~1 of the Town Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 9-1-1. Adoption.
(1) Pursuant to Title 31, Article 16, parts] and 2, Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended, there
is hereby adopted by reference Articles I and II, inclusive of the 1995 edition ofthe "Model
Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities," promulgated and published as such by the Colorado
Department of Transportation, Staff Traffic and Safety Projects Branch, 4201 East Arkansas
Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222. The subject matter ofthe Model Traffic Code relates
primarily to comprehensive traffic control regulations for the Town. The purpose of this Article
and the Code adopted herein is to provide a system of traffic regulations consistent with state
law and generally conforming to similar regulations throughout the state and the nation,
(2) One copy ofthe Model Traffic Code adopted herein is now filed in the office of the Town
Clerk and may be inspected during regular business hours,
(3) This Article and the Model Traffic Code adopted herein shall apply to every street, alley,
sidewalk area, driveway, park and to every other public way or public place or public parking
area, either within or outside the corporate limits of the Town of Fraser, the use of which the
Town of Fraser has jurisdiction over and authority to regulate. The provisions of sections 1401,
1402, 1413 ofthe Model Traffic Code, respectively, concerning reckless driving, careless
driving, unauthorized devices, and eluding a police officer, shall apply not only to public places
and ways but also throughout the Town of Fraser.
(4) To the extent the term "Model Traffic Code" or "Traffic Code" is used elsewhere in the
Fraser Town Code or the Ordinances of the Town of Fraser or any of its Rules or Regulations,
that term is hereby deemed and ordained to refer to the 1995 revised edition of the Model Traffic
Code for Colorado Municipalities, as adopted and modified by this Ordinance.
1.2 Section 9-1-2 of the Town Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 9-1-2. . Additions or Modifications.
(1) The said 1995 Edition of the Model Traffic Code is subject to the following additions or
modifications:
(a) Section 1701(1) of the Model Traffic Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
2
ýÿ
e e
It is a traffic infraction for any person to violate any of the provisions of this Code
· unless such violation is, by any provisions of this Code or by any other law of this
. state, declared to be a misdemeanor traffic offense. Such a traffic infraction shall
constitute a civil matter.
(b) i Section 1709 of the Model Traffic Code is amended by the addition of new
subsec1ions (6), (7) and (8), which shall read as follows:
!(6) Payment ofa penalty assessment notice by the person to whom the notice is
'tendered shall constitute an acknowledgment of guilt by such person of his or her
. violation of the offense stated in such notice.
i (7) Payment of the prescribed fine shall be deemed a complete satistaction for
ithe violation, and the Town, upon accepting the prescribed fine, shall issue a
receipt to the violator acknowledging payment thereof. Checks tendered and
accepted and on which payment is received shall be deemed sufficient receipt.
1(8) Should the defendant charged by a penalty assessment notice accept the
,notice but fail to pay the prescribed penalty thereon within twenty (20) days
'thereafter, he or she shall be allowed to pay such penalty thereon and the
lmaximum court costs permitted for municipal courts under state law to the clerk
iofthe Fraser Municipal Court prior to the time for appearance as specified in the
notice.
(c) In tccordance with the provisions of Sections 1101 and 1102 of the Model Traffic
Code, nd when official signs are erected giving notice thereof, the prima facie speed
limit s>>all be as specified for the following streets or portions thereof within the Town of
Fraser:
Name of Street Portion Affected Speed Limit
(Terminal Limit)
Leonard Lane North of the South Line of 15 MPH
Fraser Avenue
Norgren North of the South line of 15 MPH
Fraser Avenue
3
It e
Eastom Between Leonard Lane and 15 MPH
Norgren
All other Stre~ts All portions within the Town 20 MPH
within the Town, limits
except U.S. Highway
40 (Zerex A venue)
U.S. Highway 40 East bound traffic from 40 MPH
(Zerex Avenu~) North Town limit for a
distance of 0.072 miles.
U.S. Highway 40 East bound traffic from 35 MPH
(Zerex Avenue) the last-referenced point
on U. S. Highway 40, for a
distance of 0.493 miles.
U.S. Highway 40 East bound traffic from 45MPH
(Zerex A venue) the last-referenced point
on u.s. Highway 40, for a
distance of 0.403 miles. ~
U. S. Highway 40 East bound traffic from 55 MPH
(Zerex A venue) the last-referenced point
on U.S. Highway 40, for a
distance of 0.731 miles.
U.S. Highway 40 East bound traffic from 45 MPH
(Zerex A venue) the last-referenced point
on U.S. Highway 40, for a
distance of 0.245 miles.
U.S. Highway 40 East bound traffic from 35 MPH
(Zerex A venue) the last-referenced point
on U.S. Highway 40 to the
South Town limit.
U.S. Highway 40 West bound traffic from 45 MPH
(Zerex A venue) South Town limit for a
distance of 0.148 miles.
4
e e
u.s. Highway 40 West bound traffic from 55 MPH
(Zerex Avenue) the last-referenced point
on u.s. Highway 40, for a
distance of 0,689 miles.
U.S. Highway 40 West bound traffic frol11 45 MPH
(Zerex Avenue) the l~st-referenced point
on U.s. Highway 40, for a
distance of 0.560 miles.
U.S. Highway 40 West bound traffic from 35 MPH
(Zerex Avenue) the last-referenced point
on U.S. Highway 40 to the
North Town limit.
? (J) 4t~d ~~ 10........ Cel) It) ,."...., (e)~) ""","",,, (g)
U Section 911-3 of the Town ode is amended to rea as ollows: ) b<. (5)
I . Lh e~ d..t.J :
Section 9-1-3.1 Civil and Criminal VioIations~ Right to J ury Trial. (i) bu~ (})- ~eVl! , ?
. - k. C) 77
.Jrl ) c.~' . . -'
(1) It is a critiinal traffic offense for any person to violate any of the folIo . g provisions of the -
"Model Traffit Code for Colorado Municipalities" as adopted by the Town of Fraser:
(a) Se~tion 1101(1), Speed limits, where the violation charged is driving more than
twentyl (20) miles per hour in excess of the reasonable and prudent speed or in excess of
the laWful speed limit;
(b) Section 1105, Speed contests;
(c) Se~tion 1401, Reckless driving;
(d) Sef;;tion 1402, Careless driving;
(e) S~tion 1413, Eluding or attempting to elude a police officer;
(f) Seqtion 1903( 1), School buses-stops-signs-passing.
I
I
(2) Except fori those violations classified as criminal traffic offenses pursuant to subsection (1),
all violations df this Article or of the "Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities" as
adopted by thel Town of Fraser are hereby classified as noncriminal traffic infractions which
shall be deem~ to be civil matters. The Colorado Municipal Court Rules of Procedure shall
apply to proce~dings in which the defendant is charged with such a noncriminal traffic
I
5
--,--~
ýÿ
() 0
infraction, e~cept that no warrant for arrest shall be issued for the defendant's failure to appear
when the only violation charged would constitute a noncriminal traffic infraction. Instead, the
Court may enter a judgment of liability by default against the defendant for any such failure to
appear; assess any penalty and costs established by law; and report the judgment to the State
Motor Vehicle Division which may assess points against the defendant's driving privileges and
may deny an application for or renewal of the defendant's driver's license until the judgment and
all other lawful costs are satisfied. Further, no writ of mittimus shall issue where the only basis
for the fine and cost~ imposed was the finding of guilty or liability for a noncriminal traffic
infraction. !
(3) Any defendant charged with a criminal traffic offense, as defined in subsection (1), shall
'have the right to demand a trial by jury upon compliance with the provisions of State law and the
Colorado Municipal Court Rules of Procedure. No defendant shall have a right to a trial by jury
for any noncriminal traffic infraction, as defined in subsection (2). In the event that a defendant
is charged with more than one traffic violation arising out of the same incident and at least one.
of the charged violations is listed in subsection (1) above, the defendant shall ha~le the right to
demand a trial.by jury as to all such offenses, which shall be consolidated for purposes of trial.
,1.4 Section 9-3-12 of the Town Code, concerning penalties fer violation of the TO\>\'l1S
snowmobile regulations, is amended to read as follows:
. Section 9~3-12.. Penalties and Enforcement.
(Il Any person admitting liability for, found to be guilty of, or against whom a default judgment
has been entered for a violation of this Article, ,shall be subjecttoa civil penalty of not mOfC
than three hundred dollars ($300.00). Proceedings for the detennination of such liability and
imposition of such civil penalty shall be conducted in the Municipal Court in the same manner
as proceedings relating to noncriminal traffic infractions, in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 9, Article 9- I of the Fraser T 0\\'11 Code. In no case shall any defendant found, guilty of
any violation of this Article be punished'by imprisonment for such violation.
PART 2: PENALTY CLAUSES. Thc folIo\\1ng section ofthcCode of the TOn-n of Fraser,
Colorado, contains penalty clauses applicable to violations of this Ordinance, and such section is
herewith set forth in full and hereby enacted:
Section 9-1-4. Penalties.
(1) The following penalties shall apply to traffic offenses and infractions under this Article:'
(a) Any person convicted ofa criminal trafficoffcnse, as defined in Section9-1-3{1},
shall be punished by a fine not exceeding Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00), or by
6
e e
imprisonment fat: not exceeding ninety (90) days, or by both such fine and imprisonment;
(b) Any person admitting liability for, found to be guilty of, or against whom a default
judgm~nt has been entered for any noncriminal traffic infraction, as defined in Section
9-1- 3(~'shall be fined in an amonnt not exceeding Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00).
No det1 ndant found to be guilty of any noncriminal traffic infraction shall be punished by
impris nment for such infraction.
I
PART 3: REJ>~.& Any IlIld all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the Town of
Fraser coverin~ the same matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all
ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby
repealed; prov.ded, however, that such repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or
punishment of~ny person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance hereby
repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance.
PART 4: SE~RAB[LITY. Ifany section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ,
,
Ordinance or tl1e said Codes adopted herein is, for any reason, held to be invalid or
unconstitutiornb, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining
portions of thisi Ordinance or said Codes. The Town of Fraser hereby declares that it would have
adopted this OJi"dinance and said Codes, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof,
irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases
thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
PART 5: EF~CTIVE DATE. This Ordinance and the Codes adopted herein by reference shall i
take effect thirtY (30) days after passage, adoption and publication of this Ordinance as provided
by law.
READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES AFTER PUBLIC HEARING AND SIGNED THIS _ day of
, 1997.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO
BY:
Jeff Johnston, Mayor
7
ýÿ
e e
ATTEST:
(SEAL) Virginia Winter, Town Clerk
Published in the Winter Park Manifest on , 19 .
8
e 40th e
glq7 All II il,ersw:v l!J!J7
....... BUCHER, WilLIS & RATLIFF
....J.~ CORPORA TIO N
Ellgillt'LI':~, llIUilIll'i',s & .-\l'dlit('l'lh
July 29, 1997
Mr. Chuck Rdd
Town Manager
Town of Fraser
PO Box I 20
Fraser, CO ~()442
Re: Street Improvements
Dear Chuck:
It was a pleasure to meet with you on Friday, July 11, 1997 to review your upcoming street improvements and
the tour of your town to view existing conditions. Based on this information, Bucher, Willis & Ratliff
Corporation is pleased to submit our proposal to assist with engineering evaluation and design services. We
understand you are planning to fund this project through a general obligation bond proposed to the voters at
the April, 1998, election. With this in mind, we would propose the project services be completed in four
phases, These being:
. Study / Evaluation Phase
. Design Phase
. Bid Phase
. Construction Phase
The Study /Evaluation Phase should be completed before the municipal election to provide detail costing
information and pruposed improvement recommendations. The services performed as the study/evaluation
phase will pruviJe cunceptual design and a detailed cost analyses based on general field measurements. It wilI
serve as the preliminary design from which the design process can proceed from. Following the election, the
project CLUJ proceed directly into the design phase based on the conceptual plan already developed. The
remaining phases could be performed following the municipal election or timely with the proposed
,construction season.
The following is an identification of tasks that we recommend be performed within each of the fOllr phases.
Sll/dy Phase
. Kick-oil meeting and data gathering.
Review: Existing plans
R/W information
Previous studies/reports
Traffic patterns
Zoning information
1741 WAZIE STREET, SUITE :WO I [)ENVCl~. COLORADO 1l0202-1280 . 303/L'J2.5056 I fAX:lOl/2'J2-56611
ýÿ
e e
Mr. Chud" RdJ
July 29, 1997
Page 2
. Perform preliminary site evaluation.
l'v1easure length of streets.
Measure width of stre!::ts.
Identify existing drainage patterns,
Perform limited survey to assist in identification of urainage patterns.
Note existing drainage features.
. Develop recommendations.
Determine recommended street widths using R1W information zoning information, general
traffic patterns during our site evaluation and from Town staff input.
Develop recommended drainage improvements ie.: valley gutters, edge of
street gutters, ditches, l:ulverts and other.
Develop street surfacing alternatives. Review pros and cons of alternatives and recommend
proposed surfaces.
. Develop estimates of probable cost to evaluate options and for summary of anticipated project
costs,
. Rc\liew each railroad crossing, contact the railroad company and review options, costs and
schedule for crossing improvements.
. Prepare a brief report and graphic to detail recommendations. Provide presentation board of
graphics for use at upcoming election.
. Altend meetings. We anticipate two interim meetings and one presentation of the report to Town
Trustees and/or general public.
Design Phase
. Perform topographic survey.
. Perform soils investigation.
. Lot:ate utilities with assistance of local service providers.
. Prepare prdiminary layout and grade of proposed street improvements.
. Prepare preliminary drainage calculations and layout of proposed drainage system.
. Develop preliminary plans including:
Cover Sheet
Stred Plan and Profile Sheets
Drainage System Improvements
Details
. Develop preliminary estimate of probable cost.
. Submit 35 pert:ent t:omplete plans for review.
. Attend review meeting.
ýÿ
e e
Mr. Chuck Rdu
July 29, 1997
Page 3
. Develop final plans including:
Cover Sheet
Index/General Note Sheet
Street Plan ami Profile Sheets
Drainage System improvements
Ddails
. Develop construclion bid docull1enls and technical specifications.
. Develop estimate of probable cost.
. Submit 65 percent complete plans and specifications for review.
. Attend review meeting.
. Submit final plans anu specifications for review.
. AlIend review meeting.
. Altend interim meetings as needed.
. Prepare final plans and specifications for bid purposes after addressing any final review
comments.
. Submit final plans and specifications for bid.
Bid Phase
. Prim 20 sets of plans and specifications for bid.
. Attenu pre-bid meeting.
. Assist with the bid process.
. Prepare any clarification addendums.
. Assist with bid opening/review of bids as requested.
CO/lstructio/l Phase
. Attend pre~construction conference.
. Review shop drawings.
. Assist with site observation of construction as requested.
. Attend Owner/Contractor meetings as requested.
. Assist with any change order preparation.
. Review interim contractor payment requests as requested.
. AlIend the final walk-thru inspection.
. Develop and prepare the final punch list.
. Attend the eleven month post construction inspection and develop a list of any olltstanding issues
to be addressed by the contractor.
ýÿ
e e
IVI... Chuck Rl:id
July 29,1997
Page 4
We have developed a fee estimate to perform the services outlined in the Study/Evaluation Phase for your
consideration. Fees and schedules for the design phase, bid phase and construction phase should be negotiated
after the study/evaluation phase is completed and the project is more clearly defined, QUI' fee for the
Study/Evaluation Phase is $17,228.00, and is itemized on the attachment sheet. We have based our scope and
fee 011 our understanding of your project and needs. We would be happy to meet with you 10 review and
modify our proposed projet:t swpe and fee 10 meel your needs if they are different than our understanding.
Following your acceptance of our swpe and fee we can prepare an agreement for signature. Qur schedule is
such that we can commit staff to begin your project promptly and complete within a reasonable time schedule
10 meet your schedule for the April election. If you have any questions, please call. We look forward to
working with you and your staff.
Sincerely,
& RATLIFF CORPORATION
----
mS/g~m
:\ Q"_H11'U\1 IUSt'IUll:
ýÿ
e
e
FEE ESTIMATE
ST AFF Principal Project Sen~or Civil
Manager Civil Engineer
Technician Clerical
.... .... .. i_ ~" .... .....1'.;i{i}...... ;.... -
BILLING ...... .....;.... 4: ir.
,.' " ", ..' ') 'j
..
'l'ASI< DESCJ{JP'l'{ON
Kkk-Off Meeting 4 6
$888
Preliminary Site ~valuation ~
· Measure LeJlgtll of gwets 16 16
$2,048
. Measun: Widthlof Sheets 4 4
$512
. ,-
I
· ldellt!fy Drailllz$t? Pattems 16 16
$2,048
. Perfilrlll Limite~ Survey 16 16
$2,048
. T I
· Ideut!JiJ ExistillgDrainage
-
4 4
$512
Features I
. I
. Travel 6
6 $768
Develop Recomn1endations
. Street Widtlls j 2
4 $356
. Drainage Impr~Jllelllellts "I 4 16
$1,217
. Sw}ilce AI/en/atioes 1 4
$278
,
.
Develop Estimat~ of Cost 1 8
2 $552
Review RR Cros~ing 2 4
$356
Report and Graphics 1 8 32
8 $2,625
Meetings (3) 16
$1,248
:
Ex penses
:
. Ivlilcagt' (0 trips @ 2UU 1Ili. @
$348
$/l. 29/1Il i. I
. Meals (18@ $'20 + 3 @ $8)
$384
. Motel (6 @$90)
$540
. Prillting, computer, etc. .
$500
" -':. c.":'" "f' ......: ,.,..{",,:',y .' .... ',.
..: 'l,p " ". .. f
:'L L !:i:~.g~,( '(i:S<...\~~I< ,.'........ '..
t ': ' ..: ...,..
"~I'
, ':'> .,,'i,,' " "
.
Bucher. Willis & Ratliff COI])()mtiol1
ýÿ
tit e
CML l:o?M.j S(",/q:j
COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
,
I I. '
1660 Lincoln Stteet, Suite 2100 · Denver, Colorado 80264-2101 · Phone (303) 831-6411, FAX (303) 860-8175
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks in Municipalities with no
Manager
FROM: Jan Gerstenberger, Intergovernmental Affairs Specialist
RE: TRANSPORTATION FINANCING BALLOT INITIATIVE
DATE: July 25, 1997
I
,
I
The Leaglue is supporting the transportation financing ballot
initiative being promoted by the Citizens for Colorado
Transportjation Network. The CTN proposal is expected to raise $2.4
billion to fund both state and local transportation projects before
being au~omatically repealed in 13 years.
While raising only a portion of the $13 billion state and local
transportation funding shortfall over the next 20 years as
identifi~d by the Blue Ribbon Panel on Transportation, it is a very
important+ step in addressing transportation needs in Colorado.
Since CT~ is progressing well with its petition circulation efforts
to get the 54,242. signatures needed to get the measure on the
ballot, we anticipate that the initiative will qualify for the
November 4, 1997, statewide ballot.
CTN prop~al. The increased HUTF ~evenues would be allocated on
the Leag, e- supported 60% state, 22% county, and 18% municipal
sharebacli formula. Most of the revenue is consti tutionally
earmarke4 for highways only, with about 15 percent considered
II flexiblell and available for al ternaiti ve modes as well as highways.
The revenues come from: 5 cents/gallon motor fuel tax increase;
$10 motor vehicle registration fee increase; and $100 "new wheelsll
tax. Th~ increases would be effective Jan. 1, 1998, and sunset
Dec. 31, 2010. The Transportation Cbrrunission is also authorized to
study an4 implement, if feasible, toll roads. (This does not add
or change the state's existing toll~ng authority.) A copy of the
; ballot measure may be obtained from: the League.
, Importan~e to municipalities.
* It wi!ll mean a significant increase in HUTF revenues in each
municipa1:ity and county to help fund critical transportation needs
in your Qwn area.
(more)
e e
* It will mean a significant increase in HUTF revenues for CDOT
to help fund priori ty transportation projects/corridor improvements
throughout the state. Funding these projects would also reduce the
demand on current funding sources to fund these needs and result
ultimately in other, less high-profile state projects also being
funded.
* The measure provides not only funding for highway, street, and
road needs, but also provides that a portion of the funds is
available for alternative mode projects.
* The measure "de-Bruces" these additional revenues, allowing the
state and local governments to spend the moneys outside TABOR
spending limits.
What can ~unicipal officials do?
* Identify municipal proj ects that would be funded wi th the
increased HUTF revenues.
* Identify from CDOT's attached "Strategic Transportation
Projects" list the projects/corridor improvements that would be
funded by the measure that are of benefit to your municipality or
region.
* Adopt ~ resolution in support of the measure (sample attached) .
* Distribute the resolution through established, customary means.
Citizens $hould have a clear idea what transportation improvements
would be made in their municipality and region if the measure is
adopted. Municipal official involvement NOW in identifying how
your enti ty would use these funds is key to understanding the
significance of the measure.
Since pas.sage of the proposal at the November election would
increase HUTF revenues starting in January 1998, you may wish to
identify transportation improvements which would be funded by the
CTN measure as part of your 1998 budget preparation process. Also,
development of your municipal project list at this time could help
your municipal governing body determine whether to adopt a
resolution of support for the CTN measure. The League has prepared
the attached CTN Revenue Estimate by Entity to assist you in this
effort.
For many, identification of projects is not hard. Look to your
under-funded maintenance programs or unfunded, long-range capital
improvement programs. Consider using this information in
conjunction with a public process to identify priorities for using
the additional funds.
Municipal officials can and should become actively involved in the
public discussion of ballot issues, but only with careful attention I
being given to the restrictions imposed by the Fair Campaign
Practices Act (Sect. 1-45-117). See the attached article for
additional details on the law.
(more)
e e
Municipal Estimates. The total additional municipal HUTF revenues
are estimated by the office of state planning and budgeting to be
$434 million, which is an average of $33 million per year. This
means an annual HUTF increase for 13 yea+:,s to each individual
municipality of approximately 36% over your entity's estimated 1998
HUTF receipts. The attached individual municipal estimates were
prepared using the FY 1997/98 internal municipal distribution
percentage share formula.
These estimates can be used for general planning purposes.
Recognize that they are based on estimated fuel consumption, motor
vehicle registration, and added numbers of vehicles which may shift
over time; that the revenues would probably be less than the
$33 million per year average in the early years and more in the
later years; and that each entity's percentage share is subject to
change every year.
If you have any questions, please feel to contact Jan
Gerstenberger, Sam Mamet, or Ken Bueche at the League.
Attachments: Sample Resolution
State Campaign Reform Law article
CDOT's "Strategic Transportation Project.. list
CTN Annual Revenue Estimates by Municipality
~ "".... . .... . _....._....-1.-___ _~ ~.~ _w._.. ~ . ~. _....,. .. _ . .
. .--.....- i e CTN TRANSPORTATION! FINANCING .TIATIVE
! . .
.,. ESTIMATED ANNUAL. MUNICPAL REVENUE
r
I
REVISED rt-97
Computed I Computed.
I
I
AGUIlAR 7,352.85 I.OACONO 33,803.34
AKRON 23,722.39 i .OE eEaUE 3,920.66
ALAMOSA 75,318.69 i DEER TRAIL 9,649.16
AlMA 2,213.42 ! DEL NORTE 19,i40.68
ANTONITO 13,647.58 I DELTA 50,014.98
ARRIBA 4,983.44 . ,DENVER 7,705,038.67
1,108,065.59 I 11,821.02
ARVADA I DILLpN
ASPEN 63,641.99 I DINOSAUR 5,670.16
AULT 12,388.03 I DOLORES 10,229.54
AURORA 2,784,922.29 i DOVE CREEK 10,170.22
AVON 45,503.19 I DURANGO 123,209.50 ~
BASALT 14,553,80 ,EADS 11,304.75 :
BAYFlELD 13,392.Q2 iEAGLE 25,215.38
BENNETr 17,11'1.43 !EATON 28,116.95
BERTHOUD 41,272.28 I ECKL::'"Y 5,736.57
BETHUNE 3,304.33 iEDGEWA TER 38.185.07
BLACK HAWK 4,005.66 I ELIZABETH 13,519.90
BlANCA 16,382.73 I EMPIRE 4,334,36
BLUE RIVER 10,849.45 !ENGLEWOOD 407,645.51
BONANZA CIlY 1,600.;Z5 I ERIE 34,717.08
BOONE 3.430.$7 I ESTES PARK 76,164.37
BOULDER 873,441.~7 I EVANS 51.393.59
BOW MAR 11,4213.70 iFAJRPLAY 7,450.07
BRANSON 1,918.~9 , FEDERAL HEIGHTS 74.657.09
BRECKENRIDGE 37,217.10 ! FIRESTONE 20,102.76
BRIGHTON 138,121.19 I FLAGLER 11.788.72
BROOMAELD 322,461.~6 ! FLEMING 6,056.62
BRUSH 48.615.14 i FLORENCE 40,264,62
BUENA VISTA 31,144.~2 I FORT COWNS 1,062,066.62
BURUNGTON 39,342.01 I FORT LUPTON 72,019.77
CALHAN 9,88+.~8 i FORT MORGAN 115,267.05
CAMPO 3,480.48 i FOUNTAIN 112.91269
CANON CIlY 159.428,56 !FOWLER 12,768.06
CARBONDALE 40,O06.~8 I FOXFIELD 10,927.29
CASTLE ROCK 160,999.~1 i FRASER 9,030.90
CEOAREOGE 21,983.03 I FREDERICK 23.928.92 I
CENTER 23,160.47 I FRISCO 33,45203
CENTRAL CIlY 8,326.21 ! FRUIT A 53,819.06
CHERAW 2.785.$4 ! GARDEN CIlY 1,832.09
CHERRY HILLS VILlAGE 75,57Ia:~O i GENOA 3,388.54
CHEYENNE WEllS 15,58$.45 jGEORGETOWN 14,407.57
COAL CREEK 3,517,S5 i I3ILCREST 11,993.20
COKEDALE 1,63$.~6 I GLENDALE 21,642.54
COLLBRAN . 3,376.27 .1 GLENWOOD SPRINGS 86,126..05 i
COLORADO SPRINGS 4.495,42i,5~ I GOLDEN 141.531.38
COLUMBINE VALLEY 11,121$.09 , GRANADA 8,105.69
COMMERCE CITY 227,643.15 ! GRANBY 13,082.51
CORir::Z 84,165.35 I GRAND JUNCTION 484,762.63
CRAIG 104,860.75 I GRAND LAKE 10.637.85
CRAWFORD 4,560.66 I GREFI EY 500,482.43
CREEDE 6,073.13 I GREEN MTN. FALLS 9,026.78
CRESTED BUITE 15,158.57 iGREENWOOD VILLAGE. 141,422.80
CRESTONE 2,956.08 I GROVER 3,839.03
CRIPPLE CREEK 17,n4.92 ! GUNNISON 52,241.66
CROOK 2,992.99 I GYPSUM 27,881.70
CROWLEY 3,015.02 , HARTMAN 2,447.53
1
July 8,1997
Strategic Transportation Projects
As Adopted by the Colorado Transportation Commission August 15, 1996
1-25/ SlI50 I 5H 47 Pueblo Interchange Reconstruction $45 $18 $27 -
1-25, S. Academy to Briargate El Paso Reconstruction, Safety, ITS & Widening $154 $40 $114
1-25 IllS 361 SII270 Adams Capacity Access - Widening $90 $17 $73
1-225 I Parker Arapahoe Interchange Reconstruction $32 $Il $21
1-76 I 120th Adams Interchange Reconstruction $42 $2 $40
1- 25 I 1- 70 (Mousetrap) Denver Interchange & Corridor Reconstruction $91 $39 $52
1-25, Owl Canyon Rd; to Wyoming Larimer &. Weld Concrete Reconstruction $25 $0 $25
1-70, Tower Road to Kansas Arapahoe, Elbert, Lincoln Concrete Reconstruction SI66 $55 $111
&. Kit Carson
1-25, SI! 7 to SH 66 Weld Reconstruction &. Widen (4 to 61anes) $161 $9 $152
US 50, Grand Junction to Delta Mesa & Delta Major Widening (2 to 4 lanes) $63 $7 $56 -
US 285, Goddard Ranch C1. to Foxton Rd Jefferson Major Widening (2 to 4 lanes) $50 $3 $47
US 287, Kiowa County to Oklahoma Lincoln, Kiowa, Baca, Concrete Reconstruction $160 $1 $159
Cheyenne & Prowers
US 16Ci, Wolf Creek Pass Mineral Reconstruction $25 $0 $25
US 40, Berthoud Pass Clear Creek Reconstruction $39 $7 $32
5H 550, Durango to New Mexico State Line La Plata Major Widening (2 to 4 lanes) $81 $8 $73
SII 160, Jet. SH 3 E. to Florida River La Plata Major Widening (2 to 4 lanes) $17 $1 $16
, -
July 8.1997
Strategic Transportation Projects
As Adopted by the Colorado Transportation Commission August 15, 1996
C-470 Ext~l1sion J~ff~rson Construct new 4 lane facility $19 $9 $10 e
US 34. 1<25 to US 85 Larimer & Weld Major Widening (2 to 4 lanes) $17 $16 $0
tiS 1157, Lov~land to Broomii~ld Bould~r & Larimer Reconstruction & Wid~n (2 to 4 lanes) S4g $1 S46
Pllw~rs Blvd. in Colorado Springs EI Paso New 4 to 6 lane facility $251 $5 5246
SH It!, GI~nwOlxl to Aspen Pitkin Reconstruction & Widen (2 104 lanesJ Sill 526 $85
Santa re Corridor in Denv~r Arapahoe Reconstruction / HOV / Light Rail $19 SO $19
Soulh~t Corridor (1-25. Broadway lo Denver, Arapahoe & Douglas Congestion Improvement 5650 SO 5650
. Lincoln Ave.)
East Corridor (Downtown Denver to DIAl Denver & Adams Congestion Improvement $454 $0 $454
West Corridor (US 6. 1-25 to 1-70) Denver & Jefferson Congestion Improvement $321 $0 5321
8
1-70 West Corridor (1-70, DIA to Eagle Denver, Jefferson, Congestion Improvement $1,005 $0 \:,:,;",
S1,005
County Airport) Clear Ck, Summit & Eagle
Denver 10 Colorado Springs (1-25) Denver, Arapahoe, Douglas, Congestion Improvement $525 $1 $524
El Paso & Pueblo
North 1-25 Corridor (Denver 10 Fort Collins) Denver, Adams, Boulder, Congestion Improvement $200 $2 Sl98
Weld & Larimer
Note: Some corridor costs changed on February, 14 1997, but the total dollar cost of the Strategic Traosponation Projects program remains the sam~.
ýÿ
e e
August 7. 1997
Animal Control
3475 County Rd. 57
Cranby. CO 80446
To Whom This May Concern.
Please help J2IElDOM from chronical roaming dogs !!!l!Q in and around
Byers' Peak Vista Mobile Home Park and Wes,t Fraser. Open range for
unleashed and poorly managed dogs within this reddentlal area is not
only apinet the law. but MUsr be addreseed. It 1s nothing less than
UNOIVILIZED to allow dogs~un freely to defecate on neighbor's yards
INCESSANTLY. One of t.he worst offenders (according t.o neighbors) 1s
J OM Oa tula who lives 1n the ten foot wide green mobile hOlle with a
flat roof--near the mIddle of the mobile home p&rk. His German p.lice
dog 1. released and allowed to do 1 ts thing on a recular basis wi th-
out any clean up.
Enclosed is a picture taken seconds after his dog and one belonging
to the resident of "139 Mill Ave.--Guz/Gar1 Droll (or) Schwartz--726-9335"
(data on dog tag) finished defecating on lttty Sue Ooulson's lawn (See
photo). This continual obnoxious behavior; can be verified by Me Coulson.
on the corner of Leonard. lane and Mill Ave., 726-,5404. When neighbors
mow their laws they find piles of excrement here and there--never hav-
ing been cleaned up. These abuses are continually on-goingf
The Nelsons, 191 14111 Ave., 303-422-7577/726-1154. constructed a
steel fenCe around their front laND BECAUSE of these problems--even in-
stalling plexiglasB at the corners where dogs lIould squirt through the
fence on their trees! Debbie Anello, 726-0203. who lives between Ms
Cou180n and the Nelsons can ver1fy several doge in the community run
freely without leashes. So can Joni faussl, space four. (first mobile
hOlle west of 191 Mill Ave.). Pa t and MarY'llIoy1:l1bait. Ilobile home pa.rk
off1cers. 141 Mill Ave., 126-592.5, know troll years ot experience there's
little to no an1mal control/enforcement with regard to the above.
Could you please do whatever is neces.-.ry to address these problems.
80 Fraser residents can live in peace, not having to continually clean
up thi. Bross, sordid blight caused by those who have no respect for the
la. or their fellow ma.n?1 If' distance from enforce.ent location, Hot
Sulpher Springs and Xreaml1ng where eher1fts cOile froa. in being l.h.
_1n problem ot entorceaent, could you not.deputlze or delegate authority
1n Fraser. so entorcement could be PJWFICIEIfr as well as COST-EFFECTIVE?
Respectfully yours,
The Concerned For The Improvellent of Fraser
Enolosee
CCI The Honorable Mayor Jeff Johnston and The TUND of Fraser Board. of Trustees
ýÿ
. . 8/~/tt':l
NEW MASTERPLAN ACCOMODATIONS
. Additional density reductions
. Removal of parkway from the meadow
. Removal of recreation center from the meadow
. Removal of clubhouse from the meadow
. Removal of highway 40 access from the meadow
. Removal of multi-family development from the meadow
(7W)
. Added berming on landscape screen along portions of
parcel 4 W
. Provided additional land for the realignment of King's
Crossing and decreased the number of access points on
King's Crossing
. Increased park/open space dedications
. Added equestrian center and cross county ski facilities
as potential uses
. Added park acreage in the village core and ice rink as
potential use
. Eliminated golf course adjacent to the Fraser River
0513mv\docs\mpaccpm ,doc
ýÿ
,.
~ . .
Scenario! ''A "
Maryvale LLC - Proposed Unit Densities
August 6, 1997
Planning Approximate # of Residential # of Lodging Commercial
AID Averaae Densitv Acres Units Units SJL Ft.
East - 1 E 0.4 55 22
2E 0.4 12 5
3E 0.4 12 5
,4E 0.4 40 16
5E 0.4 8 3
6E n/a - Urban 50 n/a - Urban n/a - Urban n/a - Urban
7E 2.0 28 56 60
8E 0.4 41 16
9E 18 19 342
10E n/a - Church 5 n/a - Church n/a - Church n/a - Church
11E 18 8 144
12E 18 3 54* 120* 30,000*
13E 18 5 90* 120* 40,000*
14E 18 6 108* 30,000*
West-1W n/a 29 450 600 300,000
2W 18 8 144 40,000
3W , 18 1 18 10,000
4W ! n/a 13 100 400 60,000
5W 18 23.3 419 60
6W n/a - Maintenance 2.7
7Wa 15 12 180 60
7Wb 3 11 33
8W 18 4.5 81
9W 12 10.8 130
10W 12 14.4 144
11W 2.25 76 171
12W 1 47 47
- 2,778 1,420 5.10,000
* = maximum densities allowed per each category.
~ A-.wWl'~ aLl ~1lMj tewI(M'LMTf.1; w.l'" ~~ ..u.Jv..(.....,.
~p+ ! ~tJA ~ ~.<K.;...~l (~.t w(.~ rrt/: *+- )
- ----- __ _'_n'_
P-
oi ~ .
MARYV ALE MASTER PLAN
Necessary Components For Major Density Reductions
1. Cui de sac distances, flag lot distances, and divided roads considered as dual access in
Planning Areas 9W, lOW, llW, and 12W.
Note: This was previously considered and approved by the Fraser Town Board at a
past Board meeting.
2. Maryvale LLC to dedicate land for right-of-way and cooperate fully on the future
Leland Creek railroad underpass.
3. Fraser will help facilitate Maryvale LLC's efforts in securing legal access to Kings
Crossing Road from Planning Areas llW and l2W.
4. Planning Areas IE through 8E to be approved, at a minimum, for well & septic service.
All regulations and requirements governing well & septic service will be adhered to. This
approval is necessary to make the density reductions specifically in these Planning Areas.
5. The Town of Fraser to rebate 1.4% of the total sales tax levy (or 35% of all sales tax
received by Fraser from a business located on the Maryvale property). This rebate will be
used only for infrastructure cost reimbursement, including interest. Maryvale LLC will
work with the Town of Fraser in analyzing commercial revenue projections to determine
the effect of said rebate on Town services within Maryvale. The rebate will be discontinued
upon the payoff of all infrastructure costs, including interest.
6. Maryvale LLC will deed adequate water to Fraser to serve the Maryvale development,
including the proposed golf course. Fraser, in return, will supply the Maryvale
development with water, including the proposed golf course. Calculations for water usage
shall be based on the SFE definitions included in the current water augmentation plan and
annexation agreement. Fraser will also allow Maryvale to suggest increases in tap fees over
the then current rates for Maryvale developments, and these increased portions may be
used for any portion of infrastructure cost reimbursement, including interest.
7. Chip and seal will be allowed on any road within Maryvale except the main access ways.
Main access ways are Fraser Parkway, Village Center Drive between Planning Areas 1 W
and 4W, and east of Highway 40 to the beginning of Planning Area 9E. Also, any other
roads serving a commercial area must meet Fraser asphalt roadway standards.
ýÿ