HomeMy Public PortalAbout19810527 - Minutes - Board of Directors (BOD) eeting 81-14 ,
V
am
MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
375 DISTEL CIRCLE,SUITE D-1,LOS ALTOS,CALIFORNIA 94022
(415) 965-4717
Regular Meeting
Board of Directors
M I N U T E S
May 27, 1981
I . ROLL CALL
President Richard Bishop called the meeting to order at 7 : 05 P.M.
Members Present: Katherine Duffy, Daniel Wendin, Barbara Green,
Edward Shelley, Nonette Hanko, Harry Turner, and Richard Bishop.
Personnel Present: Herbert Grench, Craig Britton, Steven Sessions ,
Del Woods , Mary Gundert, Jean Fiddes , Charlotte MacDonald, Kathy
Blackburn, Michael Foster, and Stanley Norton.
II. CLOSED SESSION
The Board recessed for a Closed Session on personnel matters at
7: 06 P.M. and reconvened for the public meeting at 7 : 36 P.M.
III . APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. April 22 , 1981
Motion: E. Shelley moved the adoption of the minutes of April 22 ,
1981 as presented. K. Duffy seconded the motion.
Discussion: N. Hanko requested the words "previous proposed"
in the first sentence of the fourth paragraph on Page Seven
be changed to read "Los Trancos" . D. Wendin requested the
second paragraph on Page Five be corrected to read "D. Wendin
said that the Committee expected to return to the Board
with an evaluation of the proposals , based on various
evaluation criteria. If the Board wishes to encourage
a certain objective, the Board would "weight" the proposals
accordingly. " D. Wendin asked H. Turner if he had called
a meeting of the Windmill Pasture Committee, and H. Turner
said he had not. K. Duffy requested the words "two cisterns"
in P. Obluda' s statement on Page Ten be corrected to read
"one cistern" . The motion to adopt the minutes , with the
corrections noted, passed unanimously, with B. Green ab-
staining from the vote.
B. May 2 , 1981
Motion: D. Wendin moved the approval of the minutes of May 2, 1981.
K. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously,
with E. Shelley and B. Green abstaining from the vote.
IV. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
j . Fiddes reported the Board had received the following written
communications :
1) A letter, dated May 20 , 1981, from N. Timothy Hall , Professor of
Geology, Foothill College, regarding the proposed geologic trail
for the Monte Bello Open Space Preserve.
2) A letter, dated May 18 , 1981, from Irene S . Berg protesting the
Herbert A Grench,General Manager
Board of Directors:Katherine Duffy,Barbara Green,Nonette G.Hanko,Richard S.Bishop,EdwardG Shelley,Harry A Turner,Daniel G.Wendin
Meeting 81--14 .:age Two
demolition of the bay tree cistern at the Monte Bello Open
Space Preserve.
3) A letter, dated May 12, 1981, from Winter Dellenbach protesting
parking lot location "L" on the Monte Bello Open Space Preserve.
4) A letter, dated May 17 , 1981, from Harry H. Haeussler, Jr.
1094 Highland Circle, Los Altos, regarding the District' s
responsibility to provide adequate parking space for people
using District preserves.
4) Letters dated May 27 , May 25, May 26, and May 25, 1981 res-
pectively expressing opposition to parking lot location "L"
on the Monte Bello Open Space Preserve from the following
individuals : Mr. and Mrs . N. R. Moseley, 3830 Page Mill Road,
Los Altos Hills ; William C. Barkow, 11384 Churton Avenue,
Los Altos ; Mr. and Mrs . John French, 335 Golden Oak Drive,
Portola Valley; and Mrs . Virginia McKim, 864 Cedro Way,
Stanford. She noted that Mrs . McKim also expressed support for
locating the parking lot in the old riding ring area in her
letter.
5) A letter, dated May 27 , 1981, from Lewis C. Reed, Treasurer,
Mid-Peninsula Trails Council, explaining the purpose of the
organization and discussing the needs for horse trailer parking
at the Monte Bello Open Space Preserve.
6) A letter, dated May 22, 1981, from David and Barbara Leeson,
15300 Blackberry Hill, Los Gatos , regarding the proposed
property exchange on the evening's agenda and their opposition
to residential development of the District's parcel unless their
interests in privacy and open space views were formally protected
in the deed by covenants to run with the land.
7) A letter, dated May 26 , 1981, from Thomas E. Harrington, 4201
Page Mill Road, Los Altos, requesting that the Board relocate
the proposed parking lot location "L" .
V. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
R. Bishop stated the Board's consensus that the agenda was adopted
as presented.
VI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Barbara H. Crafford, 16830 Sheldon Road, Los Gatos , addressed the
Board in behalf of the residents of Sheldon Road regarding several
concerns the residents had with the operation and maintenance of
the El Sereno Open Space Preserve. She distributed a letter,
dated May 15 , 1981 and signed by seventeen Sheldon Road residents ,
that outlined the residents ' concerns .
With the Board' s concurrence, R. Bishop directed staff to return to
the Board at the meeting of June 24, 1981 with a staff report on the
concerns discussed in the letter.
VII . OLD BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED
A. Addendum to Use and Management Plan for Monte Bello Open Space
Preserve
R.R.Bishop noted the agenda item had been continued from the
meeting of April 22, 1981, that the Special Meeting of the Board
held on May 2, 1981 had been a field tour of the site, and that
staff had prepared an addendum to the Use and Management Plan
for Monte Bello Open Space Preserve discussed at the April 22
meeting.
Meeting 81-14 Page Three
S. Sessions reviewed memorandum M-81-50, dated May 20, 1981,
which was the addendum to the Use and Management Plan for the
Monte Bello Open Space Preserve, report R-81-16 , dated April 17 ,
1981. He noted that staff recommended that the proposed parking
lot for the Preserve be situated in location "L" , that a pro-
vision should be included in the proposed trail system for a
connecting trail from Canyon Trail to the northeast portion of
the Preserve, that the proposed Geology Trail was felt by staff
to be an integral part of the trail system, that the flat area
where the old barns were located should be used by equestrians
on a permit basis for parking, and that staff was still recommend-
ing the removal of the cistern and spring box located above the
sag pond.
H. Haeussler stated that adequate parking should be provided for
Preserve users and that more consideration and parking areas for
equestrians should be given by the District.
Mark Schneider, Box 343, Star Route #2, La Honda, restated his
opposition to the removal of the cistern and spring box above
the sag pond, encouraged the Board to undertake a feasibility
study on providing public transportation to the Preserve, and
suggested that the District do some long-range planning on the
total number of parking areas that would be needed if the District
encourages the public to visit the Preserve.
Glen Morris, 3278 Skyline Boulevard, said he felt the members
of the public in attendance at the May 2 Special Meeting were
not in favor of the removal of the cistern and spring box above
the sag pond.
Thomas Harrington, 4201 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, stated he
agreed the spring box should not be removed and expressed his
opposition to situating the parking lot at location "L" . He
said the location highly impacted his home and members of the
public driving on Page Mill Road or hiking on the Preserve. He
referred the Board to his written communication of May 25, 1981
and its attachments and discussed his opposition to location "L"
based on safety, use, landscaping, handicapped use, and political
factors. Mr. Harrington suggested the Board separate the loca-
tion of the parking lot and the demolition of the spring box from
the proposed Use and Management Plan for the Monte Bello Open
Space Preserve and prepare a separate report on these items, while
approving the remainder of the plan. He noted the public interest
would be better served if the Board did not take any action on
the parking lot location at this time, and in response to a ques-
tion from H. Turner, stated he could support locating a parking
lot in locations "Fl" , "G" , and the"OK Corral" . Mr. Harrington
stated he did not feel staff had properly evaluated the "F1"
location he had proposed.
Ellie Huggins, 824 San Francisco Court, Stanford, stated she had
addressed the Palo Alto City Council at the May 25 meeting and
had spoken in favor of allowing reasonable access to the Monte
Meeting 81-14 Page Four
Bello Open Space Preserve with parking located on the Monte Bello
side of Page Mill Road. She noted that the Preserve could only,
in her opinion, be accessed properly from the Monte Bello side of
the road and asked that the District' s Board and staff interface
with staff and members of the Palo Alto Planning Commission so
that the matter could be resolved in the near future.
William Spangle, 3240 Alpine Road, Portola Valley, stated the
parking lot should be located on the south side of Page Mill Road,
the District should take a position on how much parking would
ultimately be provided in the area, it was time for the District
to consider how to encourage people to use public transportation
or chartered bus service for groups , visual aspects should be con-
sidered with all other factors when evaluating a parking lot
location, and said he hoped the District would not consider putting
large parking areas on all of its open space areas.
Virginia McKim, 864 Cedro Way, Stanford and an adjacent property
owner to the Preserve, stated her opposition to parking lot loca-
tion "L" because of safety and aesthetic factors, her support
for locating the parking lot in the old riding ring area of the
Los Trancos Open Space Preserve, and her opposition to the demo-
lition of the spring box.
H. Haeussler stated the District should retain the spring box
and asked if all the downed barbed wire would be removed from
the Preserve.
N. Hanko stated she hoped the Board would take some action at
this meeting to start the discussions and exploration of public
transportation possibilities with representatives from Palo Alto,
Santa Clara County, and San Mateo County. D. Wendin suggested
that the Board invite County transportation representatives to
address the Board on long-range Planning and future funding for
public transportation in the area.
S. Sessions, in response to a question from D. Wendin, stated
he had not seen any plans for the 'T '' location since it had
been introduced by Mr. Harrington dur1 ing a field tour, and he
noted the newly proposed location combined one-half of location
"L" and one-half of location "F" . He stated staff had considered
location "F" but had not recommended placing the parking lot in
this location because of geographical and access factors.
D. Wendin discussed the process that might be involved and the po-
tential goal of directing staff to meet with staff members from
San Mateo County and Palo Alto to discuss further possible loca-
tions for the parking lot. He said the ultimate goal was for
staff to recommend a location on which to do a site study, but
noted staff needed to provide the Board with information regarding
scheduling and cost analysis, including staff time and labor involved.
Purusha Obluda, 31570 Page Mill Road, Los Altos Hills, expressed
his opposition to the demolition of the spring box and the loca-
tion of a parking lot on the Monte Bello side of Page Mill Road.
Meeting 81-14 Page Five
He noted locating the parking lot in the old riding ring area
would allow for a compromise and said that if District represen-
tatives were to meet with the Preserve ' s neighbors and discuss
the parking lot location and their concerns, the matter could
be resolved in 30-60 days.
R. Bishop stated the Board should move ahead, make the area
accessible to all members of the public, and approve the use and
management plan, including the location of the parking lot, as
presented by staff. He noted he did not feel that further study
would allow the Board to make a better decision than they could
make at this meeting and said a joint planning effort could bog
down the matter. He urged the Board to approve the staff' s
recommendations contained in the reports.
N. Hanko, in response to a question asked previously by H. Turner,
stated the Palo Alto Planning Commission had opposed situating
the parking lot at location "G" because of the amount of cut and
fill that would have had to occur and because the location dis-
turbed a natural area overlooking the Stevens Creek watershed.
N. Hankoshowed slides of the spring box and cistern above the
spring box and encouraged the Board not to remove these structures.
In response to a question from D. Wendin asking what it would
take to secure the spring box and cistern, H. Grench stated the
spring box could be covered and possibly filled with rock and
the hole leading, into the cistern would have to be secured.
He noted it was staff' s intention to try to minimize all hazards
and insurance risks on the Preserve.
Sam Jones, 16891 Stevens Canyon Road, Cupertino, stated the
cistern and spring box could be a valuable water source in the
future and should be retained.
Motion: N. Hanko moved that the Board adopt the Use and Management
Plan recommendations as contained in the staff report of
April 17, 1981 and as contained in the addendum dated May 20,
1981 with the exception of the proposed parking lot "L" ,
direct staff to work with the City of Palo Alto planning
staff and San Mateo County planning staff as appropriate for
the purpose of recommending to the Board a parking lot which
will accommodate public use of Monte Bello Preserve while
protecting the visual integrity of Stevens Creek Canyon,
and use the District adopted criteria for location of sites
and recognized sites including F 1 as a basis for the study.
D. Wendin seconded the motion.
Discussion: R. Bishop spoke against the motion for the
reasons he stated earlier in the meeting when urging the
Board to accept the staff' s recommendations as presented.
Motion to Amend: D. Wendin moved that the motion be amended to in-
clude the statement that the Board reaffirms that the parking
lot be located on the south or Monte Bello side of Page Mill
Road, that the second part of the motion be amended to read
"direct staff to work with the City of Palo Alto planning
Meeting 81-14 Page Six
staff and San Mateo County planning staff as appropriate
for the purpose of recommending to the Board a parking lot
on the south side of Page Mill Road in the frontage extending
from sites G to L, inclusive, and specifically including Fl
which will accommodate public use of Monte Bello Preserve
while protecting the visual integrity of Stevens Creek Can-
yon" , and that the following statement be added at the end
of the motion "Staff to return at the June 24 meeting after
preliminary discussion with staffs of Palo Alto and San
Mateo County with a proposed schedule and cost estimate. "
E. Shelley seconded the motion to amend.
Discussion: H. Turner requested the following phrase "and
explicitly state whether or not a compromise, in their opinion,
could be reached" be added to the last sentence of the motion.
D. Wendin and E. Shelley accepted adding the phrase to the
motion to amend. The motion to amend passed on the following
vote:
AYES: K. Duffy, D. Wendin, B. Green, E. Shelley, and
H. Turner.
NOES: N. Hanko
ABSTAIN: R. Bishop
Motion to Amend: K. Duffy moved that the original motion be amended
to state that the cistern and spring box be left intact.
N. Hanko seconded the motion.
Discussion: Discussion centered on methods that could be
used to secure the cistern and spring box.
Motion to Amend Amendment: K. Duffy moved that her motion to amend
be amended to include the statement that the method of se-
curing the spring box was left to staff discretion. D. Wendin
seconded the motion. The motion to amend the amendment
passed on the following vote:
AYES : K. Duffy, D. Wendin, B. Green, E. Shelley, N. Hanko,
R. Bishop
NOES: H. Turner
The amended motion to amend passed on the following vote:
AYES: K. Duffy, D. Wendin, B. Green, E. Shelley, N. Hanko
NOES: H. Turner
ABSTAIN: R. Bishop
Discussion:
K. Duffy discussed the name changes noted in the staff re-
port for the different areas of the Preserve and requested
that staff continue the use of the name "Black Mountain
Area" wherever appropriate.
D. Wendin stated that when the District acquired the McNiel
property that area would lend itself to equestrian parking,
and therefore, the District should not have to make special
provisions for volume equestrian parking in the parking lot
along Page Mill Road. S. Sessions stated, in response to
a question from D. Wendin, staff had not studied the McNiel
area for equestrian parking.
Meeting 81-14 Page Seven
Motion to Amend: D. Wendin moved to amend the original motion such
that the Board only approve the Geology Trail in concept
and that a detailed plan of the trail be reviewed by the
Board before actual construction. B. Green seconded the
motion.
Discussion: D. Wendin stated the Board should be aware of
the costs to construct the Geology Trail and noted he was
very concerned about the area where the trail would be located.
E. Shelley stated his opposition to the motion to amend,
noting it was staff' s responsibility to see that a proper
trail was constructed.
The motion failed to carry on the following vote:
AYES: B. Green and D. Wendin
NOES: K. Duffy, E. Shelley, H. Turner, N. Hanko, R. Bishop
H. Grench stated the State Department of Parks and Recreation
was expecting to see the entire Monte Bello Development Plan,
including the parking lot location and design and staff
could not implement any part of the plan until the State
approved the whole plan, including the parking lot. The main
motion, as amended, moving that the Board adopt the Use and
Management Plan recommendations as contained in the staff report
of April 17 , 1981, and as contained in the addendum dated May
20, 1981 with the exception of the proposed parking lot L;
that the Board reaffirm that the parking lot be located on
the south or Monte Bello side of Page Mill Road ; that the
staff be directed to work with the City of Palo Alto planning
staff and San Mateo County planning staff as appropriate
for the purpose of recommending to the Board a parking lot
on the south side of Page Mill Road in the frontage extending
from sites G to L, inclusive, and specifically including
Fl which - will accommodate public use of Monte Bello Pre-
serve while protecting the visual integrity of Stevens Creek
Canyon; that the staff use the District adopted criteria for
location of sites and recognized sites including F, as a
basis for the study; that the cistern and spring box be
left intact with the method of securing the spring box
left to staff discretion ; and that the staff return at the
June 24 meeting after preliminary discussions with staffs
of Palo Alto and San Mateo County with a proposed schedule
and cost estimate and explicitly state whether or not a
compromise, in their opinion, could be reached passed on
the following vote :
AYES: K. Duffy, E. Shelley, H. Turner, N. Hanko, B. Green,
D. Wendin
NOES: R. Bishop
Motion,: K. Duffy moved that staff mitigate the safety hazards on
the site immediately. D. Wendin seconded the motion. The
motion passed unanimously.
Meeting 81-14 Page Eight
VIII. NEW BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED
A. Proposed Addition to Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve with
Land Exchange - Sorahan Property
C. Britton reviewed report R-81-22, dated May 27 , 1981, regarding
the opportunity for the District to exchange the 44 acre former
Duffy-Barnes parcel which had been withheld from dedication at the
time of acquisition, for two separate parcels totaling 37 acres in
a more critical open space area south of the Town of Los Gatos.
He noted the District would retain an open space easement over
30 acres of the Duffy-Barnes parcels and would retain design
review rights over any proposed development on the property.
He said the District would not incur any out-of-pocket expenses
in retiring the notes held by the Sorahans. He showed slides
of the property, and discussion then centered on whether the
District should have both design review and approval over any
development undertaken by the Sorahans.
K. Duffy, referring to the written communication from David and
Barbara Leeson, asked C. Britton if he felt additional wording
changes relating to design review and approval would be satis-
factory to the Leesons. C. Britton responded the Leesons had
not yet seen the final wording of the documents and that it
wasn't known if it solved all of their questions.
S. Sessions reviewed the use and management recommendations
contained in the staff report, noting that staff was recommending
the property be withheld from dedication at this time and be-
come an addition to the Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve,
Limekiln Canyon Area.
D. Wendin stated the Public Notification Committee had discussed
the approval of use and management recommendations and noted the
Committee would be suggesting that such recommendations not be
approved by the Board at the same meeting at which action was
taken on an acquisition so as to allow members of the public to
comment on the proposed use and management recommendations.
Motion: D. Wendin moved the adoption of Resolution 80-31 Approving
and Authorizing Acceptance of an Agreement to Exchange Interest
in Real Property, Authorizing Officer to Execute a Grant Deed
to the Property Being Released, Authorizing Officer to Execute
Certificate of Acceptance of Grant to District and Authorizing
General Manager to Execute Any and All Other Documents Necessary
or Appropriate to Closing of the Transaction, (Manzanita Ridge
Open Space Preserve - Sorahan Property) , as amended by C. Britton,
subject to ratification by the Sorahans. B. Green seconded the
motion.
Discussion: C. Britton read the changes recommended by S. Norton
for the second section of Exhibit D: "DISTRICT shall have the
right of Design Review and Approval as herein defined. . .Design
Review is intended to provide a process for review and approval
by the District. . . . . " and inclusion of a section (c) : "All
such buildings, structures, planted or landscaped areas, paved
areas and other improvements shall be constructed or installed
in accordance with the plans as approved by the DISTRICT, provided
that the DISTRICT' S approval shall not be withheld unreasonably. "
The motion passed unanimously.
Meeting 81-14 Page Nine
Motion: D. Wendin moved that the Board continue the use and manage-
ment recommendations, except for the recommendation in
Paragraph B relating to the cisterns, to the next Board
meeting. N. Hanko seconded the motion. The motion passed
unanimously.
Motion: D. Wendin moved that the Board withhold the property from
dedication and adopt Manzanita Ridge Open Space Preserve -
Limekiln Canyon Area as the unofficial name of the site.
B. Green seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
B. Renewal of Agreement with the City of Mountain View for Deer
Hollow Farm
S. Sessions reviewed memorandum M-81-54 , dated May 21, 1981,
regarding a six month interim extension of the current lease
for Deer Hollow Farm so as to allow staff time to review and
incorporate some proposed changes on the lease agreement with the
City of Mountain View.
Motion: K. Duffy moved that the Board approve a six month
interim extension of the agreement with the City of
Mountain View for the operation and maintenance of
Deer Hollow Farm and that the Board conceptually approve
possible changes to the agreement as discussed in the
report. E. Shelley seconded the motion.
Discussion: D. Wendin stated he would support the motion
as long as the Board would each year, have the agreement
reviewed by staff in the use and management plans .
H. Grench clarified that the Board was conceptually
approving the proposed changes to the lease agreement,
including the inclusions of the master plan document
through the use and management review process.
The motion passed unanimously.
C. Revised Annual Claims List for 1980-81
M. Foster reviewed memorandum M-81-53, dated May 18 , 1981, re-
garding changes in the 1980-81 annual claims list.
Motion: D. Wendin moved that the Board approve the revised
annual claims list for 1980-81. N. Hanko seconded the
motion and the motion passed unanimously.
D. California 2000 Project Regional Conference
C• MacDonald reviewed memorandum M-81-51 , dated May 21, 1981,
regarding the request for the District to participate as a
co-sponsor of the California 2000 Project Regional Conference
to be held on Saturday, June 20 , 1981, at Golden Gate University
in San Francisco.
Motion: E. Shelley moved that the Board agree to co-sponsor
California 2000 Project Regional Conference and
designate one or two Board members to serve as liaison
and to represent the District at the Conference.
K. Duffy seconded the motion.
Meeting 81-14 Page Ten
Discussion: Discussion centered on whether any members
of the Board would be available to serve as liaisons
and attend the conference. R. Bishop recommended the
Board approve co-sponsorship and later determine if
any Board members would be able to represent the District.
He noted staff members might have to fill in as
liaisons .
Amended Motion: E. Shelley amended his original motion and moved
that the Board agree to co-sponsor the California 2000
Project Regional Conference and if possible designate
one or two Board members or staff members to serve
as liaison and to represent the District at the con-
ference. K. Duffy agreed to the seconding of the
amended motion that passed unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS WITH NO ACTION REQUESTED
A. Presentation of Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 1981-82
H. Grench asked if the Directors had any questions concerning the
report R-81-21, dated May 21, 1981, which outlined the preliminary
budget prepared by staff for the 1981-82 fiscal year, noting the
Board would be requested to take action on the proposed budget
at their next regular meeting.
E. Shelley suggested that the Open Space Management staff prepare
a five-year plan for staffing against which all requests for
additional staff members in that section could be compared. He
also recommended that a five-year plan for capital replacement
of equipment be prepared.
H. Haeussler stated he would like to see another ranger on the
staff immediately and asked if any money had been budgeted for
the repair of the Black Mountain Trail on the Duveneck property.
S. Sessions responded no money had been allocated for development
of trails on non-District property.
Tom Kavanaugh, 1726 Spring Street, Mountain View, suggested the
Board review the District 's current financial statement and monthly
printouts at the next Board meeting.
IX. OLD BUSINESS WITH ACTION REQUESTED, continued
B. Issues and Questions from Site Emphasis and Program Evaluation
Workshops
Motion: N. Hanko moved the continuance of this agenda item to
a future meeting to be set at the President' s discretion
when all Board members were present. H. Turner seconded
the motion, and the motion passed unanimously.
R. Bishop polled the Board to determine if there were any members
who did not object to having this agenda item discussed at a meeting
when they were not in attendance. K. Duffy and H. Turner stated
they did not need to be present when the item was discussed.
X. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS
H. Grench stated the District had received 23 contributions
totaling $520 in memory of Elizabeth Holzhauser.
Meeting 81-14 Page Eleven
S. Sessions reported on the public workshop held on May 20, 1981
at Picchetti to gather input for the upcoming use and management
plan for the Picchetti area.
S. Sessions announced the Thornewood Proposals Review Committee would
be meeting on Wednesday, June 3, 1981, at the District office
beginning at 7 :30 P.M.
XI . CLAIMS
Motion: B. Green moved the approval of the revised claims C-81-11,
dated May 27 , 1981. E. Shelley seconded the motion, and
the motion passed unanimously.
XII . CLOSED SESSION
The Board recessed to Closed Session at 11: 50 P.M.
XIII . ADJOURNMENT
The Board reconvened to adjourn at 12 : 50 A.M. , Thursday, May 28, 1981.
Jean Fiddes
District Clerk