HomeMy Public PortalAboutPKT-CC-2017-08-08Moab City Council
August 8, 2017
Pre -Council Workshop
6:30 PM
REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING
7:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY CENTER
(217 East Center Street)
Page 1 of 171
Page 2 of 171
City of Moab
217 East Center Street
Moab, Utah 84532
Main Number (435) 259-5121
Fax Number (435) 259-4135
www.moabcity.org
Moab City Council
Regular Council Meeting
City Council Chambers
Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 6:30 p.m.
..........................................••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
6:30 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
SECTION 1:
SECTION 2:
SECTION 3:
SECTION 4:
SECTION 5:
SECTION 6:
PRE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1-1 July 11, 2017
1-2 July 18, 2017
1-3 July 25, 2017
CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
PROCLAMATIONS
None
PRESENTATIONS
4-1 Utah Drinking Water Board
PUBLIC HEARING (Approximately 7:15 PM)
None
SPECIAL EVENTS/VENDORS/BEER LICENSES
6-1 Family Fun Night Celebration, September 16, 2017 at Center Street Ball Fields
6-1.1 Approval of a Special Events License
6-1.2 Approval of a Park Use Permit for Center Street Ball Fields
6-1.3 Approval of a Request for a Fee Waiver
6-2 Moab Folk: Festival, October 29 to November 6, 2017 at Various Locations
6-2.1 Approval of a Special Event License
6-2.2 Approval of a Park Use Permit for Center Street Ball Fields
6-2.3 Approval of a Park Use Permit for Sun Court
6-2.4 Conditional Approval of a Park Alcohol Permit for Center Street Ball Fields
6-2.5 Approval of a Class IV Special Event Beer License
6-2.6 Granting of Local Consent for a State Issued Single Event Permit
6-3 Approval of a Vendor License for Tim Buckingham, d.b.a. Atomic Coffee, located at
1393 N Highway 191 for a term of August 9, 2017 to November 30, 2017
6-4 Approval of a Solicitor's License for Liisi Jantra, d.b.a. The Book Girl, to conduct
residential area door-to-door sales
Page 3 of 171
SECTION 7: CONSENT AGENDA
None
SECTION 8: OLD BUSINESS
8-1 Approval of Proposed Resolution #46-2017 - A Resolution Adopting the Water
System Design Criteria Manual, Wastewater System Design Criteria Manual and
APWA Manual of Standard Specifications (Utah Chapter)
SECTION 9: NEW BUSINESS
9-1 First Reading and Possible Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2017-27 - An
Ordinance To Amend Chapter 17.15.050 Of The Moab Municipal Code By Revising
Yard Setbacks, Maximum Lot Coverage, And Some Building Heights In The Schedule
Of Residential Area Regulations, To Correct The Designation Of Which Text Should
Control, And To Delete Additional Provisions Listed After The Schedule
9-2 First Reading and Possible Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2017-28 - An
Ordinance To Amend Chapter 17.09.560.A. By Increasing The Maximum Lot
Coverage For All Buildings On A Lot, In The Chapter Regarding Accessory Structures
9-3 First Reading and Possible Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2017-29 - An
Ordinance To Amend Chapter 17.09.560.B. By Decreasing The Setbacks For
Accessory Structures, And Clarifying What Is Considered The "Principal Structure"
9-4 Approval of Task Order with Bowen Collins for Work on Bridge project at 200 South,
Bullick/Cross Creeks Park
SECTION 10: ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
SECTION 11: MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
SECTION 12: READING OF CORRESPONDENCE
SECTION 13: APPROVAL OF BILLS AGAINST THE CITY OF MOAB
SECTION 14: EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION
14-1 An Executive Session to Discuss Pending or Reasonably Imminent Litigation
SECTION 15: ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should
notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days
prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org
Page 4 of 171
MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -- DRAFT
REGULAR MEETING
J U LY 11, 2017
Regular Meeting & Attendance: The Moab City Council held its Regular Meeting on the above date in
the Council Chambers at the Moab City Center, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. A
recording of the meeting is archived at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html.
Pre -Council Workshop: Mayor David Sakrison called the Workshop to order at 6:30 PM. In attendance
were Councilmembers Rani Derasary, Heila Ershadi, Tawny Knuteson-Boyd, Kyle Bailey and Kalen Jones.
Also in attendance were City Manager David Everitt, City Attorney Chris McAnany, Human Resource
Manager/Deputy Recorder Danielle Guerrero, Interim City Engineer Eric Johanson, Assistant City
Engineer Mark Jolissaint, Public Works Director Pat Dean, City Treasurer Jennie Ross, Planning Director
Jeff Reinhart, Planning Assistant Sommar Johnson, Recorder Assistant Eve Tallman, Arts and Special
Events Manager Meg Stewart and Parks, Recreation, and Trails Director Tif Miller.
The Workshop began with a review with City Attorney McAnany regarding procedures for amending an
agenda or calling special meetings of the Council. McAnany explained that state law provides for the
Mayor or any two Council members to amend an agenda or call a special meeting, and City staff would
act to provide required public notice.
The Workshop continued with a review of agenda items. City Manager Everitt brought up the
commercial site plan moratorium and explained to the Council that their options as the moratorium
sunsets would be to adopt a revised code or revert to the existing code regarding commercial site plans.
Mayor Sakrison noted the draft code is a working document and more information will be forthcoming.
Planner Reinhart pointed out there would be no major changes for the Resort Community zone. It was
explained that the zone was created in a joint effort between the City and the County to develop the
North Highway 191 corridor; the City enforces the development standards including landscaping and
parking as far as the Colorado River and the County enforces it north to the County line.
City Manager Everitt also noted there is a plan to create a website for developers with all pertinent
codes, application forms, and supporting documents.
Councilmember Jones turned the discussion to the agenda item pertaining to culinary water line
standards. He asked about the intention of having separate meters for each unit in a multi -family
residential building. City Attorney McAnany pointed out individual meters may undermine the intention
of tiered commercial rates; however, he also pointed out the rate structure is geared to each dwelling
having its own meter, which is easier to administer for water conservation programs.
City Attorney McAnany next addressed the topic of firework moratoria. He explained that state law
prohibits municipalities from restricting fireworks. He went on to explain there is a caveat in state law
that negligent discharge may be prohibited, or if there are hazardous conditions which exist within City
limits. Councilmember Ershadi brought up drought and Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd mentioned
there had already been more than 40 fires in the County due to dry conditions. City Attorney McAnany
stated he would develop language to be considered by Council in advance of the late -July holiday to
protect the community from fires caused by fireworks within City limits.
Page 1 of 6
July 11, 2017
Page 5 of 171
1-1 Minutes
Regular Meeting Called to Order: (:34 on recording)
Mayor Sakrison called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:03 PM and led the Pledge of
Allegiance. Twenty-five members of the public and media were present.
Approval of Minutes: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve the minutes of the June 27, 2017
meeting as written. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye, with
Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi, Jones, Derasary and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye.
Citizens to be Heard: The following Citizens were heard:
Christy Calvin stated she lives on Park Drive and she is concerned that the proposed development of
Park Drive as a thoroughfare would create a shortcut to high -volume destinations such as Swanny Park,
the Moab Recreation and Aquatics Center, and Helen M Knight School. She asked why a rezone is being
considered rather than a Conditional Use Permit. She also noted she is excited about the prospect of
senior and affordable housing that is included in the proposed project.
Shari Beck also spoke. She stated she lives in the neighborhood and is concerned about Park Drive
becoming a shortcut. She stated drivers will look for a quicker and faster route through the
neighborhood and she expressed her concern for children and a neighborhood daycare that will be at
risk. She also noted that special events at Swanny Park will block the street. She concluded that Park
Drive as a thoroughfare would not be good for either neighborhood.
Wendy Young spoke next. She stated she lives on Park Drive. She noted that when the subject property
was not fenced off, a foot path traversed the property and there was a great deal of vandalism along the
street. She stated she is in favor of the housing project and wants it to be of quality. She presented the
Council with a petition that included fifty-four signatures opposed to the Park Drive thoroughfare.
Amber Hughes also spoke. The stated a through street is not good for kids. She stated such a change to
Park Drive will impact all of us.
The Mayor invited Ben Riley of the Southeast Utah Housing Authority and Kirstin Peterson of the
Canyonlands Health Care Special Service District, partners in the development of the project, to address
the Council. Riley stated the site plan will be approved by the City and that the existing site plan
proposal is a working document. Mayor Sakrison asked if there was a way to develop the project
without the through -street. Peterson stated she hoped it would be so. She explained that the City and
the Fire Department should have input. Councilmember Bailey asked for a description of the project.
Peterson explained that the project involves a thirteen acre parcel owned by the Canyonlands Health
Care Special Service District for the Moab Area Project for Seniors (MAPS). The plan will include assisted
living, senior housing, affordable housing, and doctor offices. She noted that all design standards and
development documents will be approved by the City. She noted fire protection and stormwater
management are concerns. She also stated that the street need not be a thoroughfare and there are
efforts to mitigate traffic concerns.
Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses:
(:43 on recording)
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve licenses and permits for an amplified music
event for Canyonlands Natural History Association at Old City Park on July 18, 2017. Councilmember
Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi,
Page 2 of 6
July 11, 2017
Page 6 of 171
1-1 Minutes
Jones, Derasary and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye.
Consent Agenda
The Consent Agenda items were taken up separately, as follows:
Annexation Petition on 500 West —Approved
Discussion: Councilmember Derasary asked about the process because she did not want to give an
impression that she was approving anything more than annexation into the City. City Attorney McAnany
explained that the City Council must first decide if it wants to annex the subject property, and then
decides appropriate zoning and other considerations. Councilmember Jones stated his concern that
annexation applications have been approved by the Planning Commission in the past with no indication
to applicants that there may be disagreement about zoning and other concerns that follow.
Councilmember Derasary stated her concern about approving C4 Commercial zoning next to R2
Residential zoning.
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to approve the Acceptance of an Annexation Petition
by Kelly Shumway for Property Located at 500 West and 963 North and 500 West and 1001 North.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers
Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary voting aye.
Updated Recreation Fees —Approved (:53 on recording)
Discussion: Parks, Recreation, and Trails Director Miller explained daily rates are relatively low
compared to other municipalities. Daily fees are the only category with local and non -local rates.
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve Proposed Resolution #47-2017 — A
Resolution updating Recreation Fees. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-
0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary voting aye.
Police Department Laptops — Approved
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve Purchase of Dell Computers for Police
Department Laptops in the Amount of $20,997.18. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion.
Councilmember Ershadi asked what would happen to the old computers and it was explained they
would be sold at auction. It was also clarified that the purchase was made through a state contract. The
motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary voting
aye.
Bowen Collins Task Order —Approved
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve a Task Order with Bowen Collins &
Associates Engineers for 2017 General Engineering Assistance with a fee amount not to exceed
$40,000.00. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers
Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary voting aye.
Old Business:
Culinary Water Fees — Approved
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve Proposed Resolution #44-2017 —
A Resolution Revising Culinary Water Use Fees and Connection Fees. Councilmember Bailey seconded
the motion. The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and
Derasary voting aye.
Page 3 of 6
July 11, 2017
Page 7 of 171
1-1 Minutes
Amendments to Moab Municipal Code —Approved
Motion and Discussion: Councilmember Jones moved to adopt Ordinance # 2017-18 to Amend Moab
Municipal Code, with the Repeal of Sections 17.09.660 and 17.09.665 Pertaining to the Site Plan Review
process; Adding a New Chapter 17.67; Amending Chapter 17.80 Pertaining to Large Scale Developments;
and Amending Chapter 17.31, Use Restrictions in the Resort Commercial Zone to Prohibit Large Scale
Retail Developments in that zone. Councilmember Derasary seconded the motion. Councilmember
Jones thanked the Planning staff and Planning Commission for all of their efforts. Councilmember
Derasary asked for clarity on differentiation between Level One and Level Two applications. Planner
Reinhart explained. Councilmember Jones asked about the application review team, and
Councilmember Derasary asked about exemptions. Councilmembers Jones and Derasary asked about
parking and setbacks.
Vote: The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary
voting aye.
General Plan Update — Approved (1:11 on recording)
Motion and Discussion: Councilmember Derasary moved to Approve Proposed Resolution #28-2017 —
A Resolution Adopting the 2017 City of Moab General Plan Update. Councilmember Jones seconded the
motion. Councilmember Derasary asked about integrating the comments submitted by Jeff Adams from
the Canyonlands Watershed Council. City Manager Everitt noted an effort has been made to integrate
those suggestions. After recognizing a possible perception of a conflict of interest, Councilmember
Derasary noted her husband, Nate Rydman, had also made comments about water scarcity in a prior
public hearing on the General Plan Update. Councilmember Bailey stated the document could reflect
that the City is taking proactive steps to address water conservation issues.
Vote: The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary
voting aye.
New Business: (1:16 on recording)
Williams Way Rezone from R-2 to R-4 —Approved
Motion and Discussion: Councilmember Jones moved to approve Proposed Ordinance #2017-26 — An
Ordinance Amending the Zoning for Approximately Five Acres with an Address of 354 Williams Way in
the R-2 Single and Two Family Residential Zone to R-4 Manufactured Housing Residential Zone and
Amending the Official Zoning Map. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. Councilmember Jones
noted that good municipal design calls for connectivity between neighborhoods. However, he also noted
traffic calming, speed controls, parking, curves, and other calming measures can be part of the design.
Planner Reinhart noted that environmental health is a consideration, indicating that driving several
blocks out of the way wastes resources. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd noted there are forthcoming
efforts to changes the venue of some of the largest events that create parking issues at Swanny Park.
Mayor Sakrison asked if there wasn't an option to route the thoroughfare down Walnut Lane.
Councilmember Bailey noted he sits on the Board of the Canyonlands Health Care Special Services
District, which is a partner in the project, and remarked on discussions to solve the traffic concerns.
Interim City Engineer Johanson stated there would be an option in the future to discuss the site plan.
Councilmember Jones brought the discussion back to the rezone question. He noted it is the first
collaborative effort for affordable housing between the several local entities, and he stated his hope
that more would follow. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd also noted that despite the title of the zone, no
modular housing was planned for this project.
Vote: The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Body, Ershadi, and Derasary
voting aye.
Page 4 of 6
July 11, 2017
Page 8 of 171
1-1 Minutes
Water System Design Criteria — Tabled
Motion and Motion to Table: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve Proposed Resolution #46-
2017 — A Resolution Adopting the Water System Design Criteria Manual, Wastewater System Design
Criteria Manual and APWA Manual of Standard Specifications (Utah Chapter). Councilmember
Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. Councilmember Jones moved to table the motion.
Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion to table passed 5-0 with Councilmembers
Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary voting aye.
Code Provisions for Culinary Water and Wastewater Treatment — Approved (1:21 on recording)
Motion and Discussion: Councilmember Jones moved to approve Proposed Ordinance #2017-30 — An
Ordinance Repealing Certain Provisions of Title 13 Pertaining to the City of Moab Culinary Water and
Wastewater Treatment System and Enacting New Provisions. Councilmember Derasary seconded the
motion. Councilmember Jones asked about graywater provisions requiring a permit. City Attorney
McAnany explained that the graywater rules were added after a review of the proposed code revisions.
He pointed out that the State requires regulations and permits, and that this procedure would likely be
delegated to the County Building Official. He noted the State wants local rules and oversight.
Councilmember Ershadi asked if it wasn't currently in the purview of the health department. Mayor
Sakrison stated that the health department and the building department are involved. Councilmember
Ershadi asked the Attorney to ensure there wasn't any conflict, duplication, or undue red tape between
local code and state requirements. City Attorney McAnany noted the object is to move quickly to
approve the code provisions as the Department of Environmental Quality wants the regulations in place
for loan approval for the Wastewater Treatment Facility. He noted these conditions could be met.
Councilmember Ershadi asked for an update at the next meeting.
Vote: The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary
voting aye.
Administrative and Council Reports: (1:33 on recording)
City Manager Everitt requested the consent of the Council to prepare a letter expressing the City's
comments on the Manti-La Sal Forest Management Plan revisions, specifically aimed at a position on
"No Surface Occupancy" in the critical areas of the Forest that could damage the City's water supply
aquifer if contaminated by oil and gas development. He noted the City's hydrologic consultant had draft
a memo for this purpose. The Council consented, and Councilmember Ershadi stated she would like to
see a draft of the letter.
City Manager Everitt next mentioned the timeline for the City Manager recruitment process. The Mayor
and other council members expressed their desire to begin the recruitment process immediately.
Councilmember Ershadi expressed a desire to await the swearing in of the new council. Mayor Sakrison
disagreed due to the desire to have a new manager on board to become oriented before David Everitt
departs. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd stated she did not want to wait to begin recruitment.
Councilmember Derasary noted the bylaws state that the hiring must occur either before the November
election or after the January swearing -in of new council members. Councilmember Jones concurred with
pre -election hiring.
Everitt also discussed progress with regard to transportation planning and a meeting with the Utah
Department of Transportation. Councilmember Ershadi asked if there was progress regarding issues
with trucks idling on Highway 191 north of downtown. Everitt noted it was Amy Weiser's detail and she
was on leave of absence. Councilmember Jones asked about whether there was a Request for Proposals
for the Downtown Plan.
Page 5 of 6
July 11, 2017
Page 9 of 171
1-1 Minutes
Mayor Sakrison gave an update regarding the League of Cities and Towns. He stated that group has
reported the state legislature would take up building density and height in the upcoming session.
The Mayor also described a meeting he had with Mike Bynum regarding parking on Bynum's private
property adjacent to Powerhouse Lane. Bynum hoped that by providing public parking the congestion
and parking issues at the Powerhouse trailhead would be alleviated and would allow emergency access.
Discussion also covered potential expansion of the Sand Flats Recreation Area to encompass Potato
Salad Hill and providing alternate access to Millcreek. The Mayor also discussed a potential grant from
the Utah Division of Drinking Water and mentioned recycling center concerns. Councilmember Jones
asked for a tour of the recycling center.
Councilmember Derasary noted she attended Land Trust and Trail Mix meetings. She mentioned that
the Bureau of Land Management has reported at 26% increase in camping. She noted that September
26 is National Public Lands Day. She also mentioned recently publicized changes in oil and drilling
company ownership.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd noted she attended a transportation bypass meeting. She also noted
challenges to the reparations of the La Sal Mountain Loop Road project.
Mayor Sakrison noted an effort to place a Utah redistricting referendum on the ballot.
Councilmember Derasary noted the Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah (HEAL Utah) was planning a
press event in the coming week regarding rooftop solar.
Councilmember Bailey mentioned the Water Conservation Board would be meeting.
Councilmember Ershadi asked about street striping progress and Public Works Director Pat Dean stated
that this project is underway and parts would be delayed till after chip sealing. Chip seal bids are due to
be sought this month. He said the new budget year will enable Public Works to order the radar speed
signs. He stated his plans to have the striping project done on or around the start of the school year.
Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab: Councilmember Derasary moved to pay the bills against the
City of Moab in the amount of $864,787.52. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion
carried 5-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi, Jones, Derasary and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye.
Adjournment: Councilmember Bailey moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Jones seconded
the motion. The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and
Derasary voting aye. Mayor Sakrison adjourned the meeting at 8:27 PM.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David L. Sakrison, Mayor Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder
Page 6 of 6
July 11, 2017
Page 10 of 171
1-1 Minutes
MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -- DRAFT
SPECIAL MEETING
J U LY 18, 2017
Special Meeting & Attendance: The Moab City Council held a Special Meeting on the above date in the
Council Chambers at the Moab City Center, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. A recording
of the meeting is archived at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html.
Special Meeting Called to Order: Mayor Sakrison called the Special City Council Meeting to order at
12:02 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary.
Also in attendance were City Manager David Everitt, Human Resource Manager/Deputy Recorder
Danielle Guerrero, Recorder Assistant Eve Tallman, and Moab Valley Fire Protection District Chief Phillip
Mosher.
Temporary Fireworks Ban — Approved
Motion and Discussion: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve Proposed Ordinance #2017-
31- an ordinance imposing a temporary ban on the discharge of certain types of fireworks within City
limits. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion.
Mayor Sakrison described several types of fireworks that would be included in the ban, including those
that explode, fly, or report; those that travel more than six feet off the ground, roman candles, and
more.
Chief Mosher was invited to speak about fires and incidents related to the Fourth of July. Mosher stated
fires had been put out by the time the Fire Department was on scene. He stated there were not many
calls this year on the Fourth of July holiday, and noted it was a mild year, with four calls as compared to
seventeen calls two years ago.
City Manager Everitt asked about the year overall, and Mosher stated it was a low year for calls. He also
remarked on the short notice for the upcoming holiday weekend and raised questions about how to get
the word out about the potential ban. Everitt also asked if there was a sense of local residents or visitors
as the main participants in fireworks activities, and a distinction was not made.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd noted she had received several emails expressing concern about the
noise and fire danger and noted her neighborhood was heavily impacted and remnants of fireworks
landed in her yard.
Councilmember Derasary asked if there was a legal control on notification to the public, and City
Manager Everitt stated there were not legal constraints but rather matters of practicality regarding
notifying the public. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd added that several other cities had recently acted
to temporarily ban fireworks. City Manager Everitt stated he would prepare a press release.
Councilmember Jones remarked that other counties had categorically banned fireworks due to fire
danger.
Councilmember Ershadi suggested a public service announcement noting the drought conditions.
Councilmember Jones mentioned the burn ban and the effects of unpredictable winds that could
exacerbate conditions. Councilmember Ershadi suggested a future effort to coordinate with the fire
department. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd noted that law enforcement officers could talk to violators
rather than issue citations. Councilmember Bailey noted the only existing rules in place describe where
Page 1 of 2
July 18, 2017
Page 11 of 171
in the City fireworks are not currently allowed. He described the conditions on the Fourth of July as
dangerous. He added that it was overwhelming in the neighborhoods with commercial -grade fireworks,
including at the ballfields. He stated he felt people were not acting responsibly. Councilmember
Knuteson-Boyd agreed that people aren't being responsible and stated she did not want to take a
chance on setting the wetlands afire again.
City Manager Everitt stated the effectiveness of a ban may be limited due to the short notice, but that it
was a symbolic act regarding potential future actions. Councilmember Ershadi expressed concern that
dangerous activities should not be allowed at the ballfields. Councilmember Bailey noted that at one
time fireworks were enjoyable but now they are frightening. Councilmember Jones noted it will be a
good indicator of the effectiveness of public relations and added he will be interested in the positive and
negative response. City Manager Everitt stated that since many cities have enacted bans, perhaps there
will be a legislative solution.
Councilmember Derasary asked about why, historically, fireworks were allowed in the City only. The
response was that it was because of the proximity of the fire department and less open scrubland to
catch ablaze.
Councilmember Ershadi stated her hope for a public awareness push only and that a ban could be a
future collaborative effort.
Vote: The motion carried 4-1 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Derasary and Knuteson-Boyd
voting aye and Councilmember Ershadi voting nay.
Adjournment: Mayor Sakrison adjourned the meeting at 12:35 PM.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
July 18, 2017
David L. Sakrison, Mayor Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder
Page 2 of 2
Page 12 of 171
MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -- DRAFT
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 25, 2017
Regular Meeting & Attendance: The Moab City Council held its Regular Meeting on the above date in
the Council Chambers at the Moab City Center, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. A
recording of the meeting is archived at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html.
Pre -Council Workshop: Mayor David Sakrison called the Workshop to order at 6:30 PM. In attendance
were Councilmembers Rani Derasary, Heila Ershadi, Kyle Bailey and Kalen Jones. Councilmember
Knuteson-Boyd was absent. Also in attendance were City Manager David Everitt, City
Recorder/Assistant City Manager Rachel Stenta, City Attorney Chris McAnany, Assistant City Engineer
Mark Jolissaint, Police Chief Jim Winder, City Treasurer Jennie Ross, Planning Director Jeff Reinhart,
Planning Assistant Sommar Johnson, Recorder Assistant Eve Tallman, and Arts and Special Events
Manager Meg Stewart.
The Workshop began with City Manager Everitt informing the Council that there had been a request by
the County Council Administrator for more information regarding complaints the City had received
regarding the Rally on the Rocks (ROTR) All -Terrain Vehicle event. Everitt added that he could compile
those comments if Councilmembers would forward them; if not, he could respond that the information
included in the Mayor's letter was a composite of a number of verbal complaints from citizens that were
reflected back to City officials. Councilmember Derasary noted the letter from Neal Clark. City Manager
Everitt stated a call for feedback could be solicited from the public. Mayor Sakrison clarified that the
request from the County Council Administrator was based on the letter sent from the City to the
County's Special Events Committee stating the City's nonsupport for renewal of the permit for the ROTR
event. Councilmember Ershadi supported the solicitation of feedback, positive or negative.
Councilmember Jones stated there needs to be more public engagement. He added it would be
awkward to request more feedback so long after the fact, and stated his regret that people hadn't
commented more. Councilmember Bailey supported the call for more comments. It was agreed among
the Council to solicit more public feedback regarding renewal of the permit for the event.
The workshop continued with a review of agenda items, including Councilmember Derasary's request
for clarification that the City is not sanctioning the Humane Society's Barktoberfest and it is simply using
the Moab Arts and Recreation Center (MARC) during the same time as the MARC's art festival.
Councilmember Derasary also asked for clarification about a food truck vendor permit.
Mayor Sakrison mentioned the two bidders the Airport Board is considering for air service, including
Skywest with service to Denver and Boutique Air with service to Salt Lake City and Denver. The mayor
and Councilmembers Jones and Derasary supported the bid of Boutique due to the service offered to
Salt Lake City.
The discussion turned to the agenda item considering groundwater protection plans and how plans
approved in the past for the Lionsback development would be taken into account.
Mayor Sakrison announced an opportunity for the public to meet the new police chief, Jim Winder, on
Page 1 of 5
July 25, 2017
Page 13 of 171
1-3 Minutes
August 8 from 4:00 to 6:00 pm in the Council Chambers.
Mayor Sakrison also announced a $90,000 grant awarded to the City for planning.
Regular Meeting Called to Order: Mayor Sakrison called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at
6:56 PM and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Twenty-three members of the public and media were present.
Citizens to be Heard: Jeremy Day, Chairman of the Grand County Republican Party, requested the
Council to postpone hiring a new City Manager until the newly -elected City Council members and Mayor
take office. Mayor Sakrison explained the City's timeline and noted the candidates for Council and
Mayor would be invited to participate in the process and that the City is sensitive to the issue.
Presentation: Kaitlin Myers and Mary McGann presented an update and status report on the Grand
County Intergenerational Poverty Initiative (IGP). She touched on the plan and pointed out there is no
additional funding or staff to implement the plans set forth by the committee. She stated the need for a
coordinator for the Initiative. Goals of the Initiative involve parenting skills and access to quality,
affordable health care, including in -home care. Mayor Sakrison noted there may be additional funding
available and Kelly Thornton, an IGP committee member representing the Department of Workforce
Services, clarified from the audience that there is Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
funding available. Councilmember Jones asked about the expediency of house calls and Myers explained
the practicability of home nursing services and the relationship to early childhood development and
parenting skills. Mary McGann noted that caregivers are often unable to leave their homes due to
caretaking multiple family members. Mayor Sakrison asked what level of funding is desired. Sarah Shea,
another committee member representing Moab Regional Hospital, noted that an exact amount isn't yet
known. Mayor Sakrison asked about funding levels for a coordinator, and Myers stated it wasn't a full-
time job and the County is proposing a community development specialist. Councilmember Derasary
asked if there had been a discussion about living wages as part of the solution to Intergenerational
Poverty in Moab.
Police Chief Update: 056 on recording)
Police Chief Winder gave an update on his first weeks on duty. He stated the police department had
made one new hire for an officer. He added current officers are working overtime. He discussed recent
activities, including a fire caused by lightning, and his appreciation for off -duty officers who responded
to the incidents, specifically Officer Velasquez. Highlights of his week included meeting with the new
school superintendent, J.T. Stroder, as well as meetings with residents and business owners adjacent to
the Millcreek Parkway west of Main Street. He indicated a program to educate landlords is needed. He
concluded by mentioning the current review of all police department policies and procedures.
Councilmember Ershadi asked if the police department has Naloxone kits. Chief Winder responded that
he would look into acquiring some; he stated that so far, he has concern about methamphetamine
abuse and has not seen incidences of opioid overdoses.
Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses:
Moab Regional Hospital Amplified Music Event —Approved
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to approve an Amplified Music Event at Old City Park
July 25, 2017
Page 2 of 5
Page 14 of 171
1-3 Minutes
on Saturday, July 29, 2017 for Moab Regional Hospital. Councilmember Derasary seconded the motion.
The motion carried 4-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi, Jones, and Derasary voting aye.
Barktoberfest Permits — Approved
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve licenses and permits with conditions,
including a Special Event Class IV Beer License, and allowable fee waivers up to $200, for the Humane
Society of Moab Valley's Barktoberfest October 14, 2017 at the Moab Arts and Recreation Center
(MARC). Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye, with
Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi, Jones, and Derasary voting aye.
Tacos Moab Vendor License — Approved (1:13 on recording)
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve a Private Property Vendor License with
conditions for Eduardo Rodriguez, doing business as Tacos Moab, Located at 83 South Main Street for a
term of July 25, 2017 to July 24, 2018. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion carried
4-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi, Jones, and Derasary voting aye.
Consent Agenda — Approved
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Bailey moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Jones
seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Ershadi, and Derasary
voting aye. The following item was approved: Confirmation of Mayoral Appointment of Mike Duncan to
the Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board for a Two -Year Term Ending
December 31, 2018. Councilmember Bailey noted Mike Duncan was recommended by the Water
Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board.
Old Business:
Zoning for Self -Storage Warehouses — Approved (1:15 on recording)
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve Proposed Ordinance #2017-21 — An
Ordinance Amending Moab Municipal Code Chapters 17.36.020, 1-1, Industrial Zone; 17.27.020 C-4,
General Commercial Zone; And 17.09.531(14), to Remove the Use of Self -Storage Warehouses.
Councilmember Derasary seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0 with Councilmembers Bailey,
Jones, Ershadi and Derasary voting aye.
Authorization of a Hearing Officer —Approved
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve Proposed Ordinance #2017-23 — An
Ordinance to Amend Chapter 17.72 of the Moab Municipal Code to Authorize a Hearing Officer to
Decide Land Use Code Appeals and Modifying Various Appeal Procedures. Councilmember Bailey
seconded the motion. Councilmembers asked questions about the position requirements and functional
details and City Attorney McAnany responded. He explained a law degree wasn't required but legal
knowledge and familiarity with City code was essential. The motion passed 4-0 with Councilmembers
Bailey, Jones, Ershadi and Derasary voting aye.
Wastewater Service Rates — Approved (1:26 on recording)
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve Proposed Resolution #48-2017 — A
Resolution Establishing Wastewater Service Rates. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The
motion passed 4-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Ershadi and Derasary voting aye.
July 25, 2017
Page 3 of 5
Page 15 of 171
1-3 Minutes
Water System Design Criteria — Tabled
Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to table Proposed Resolution #46-2017 —A Resolution
Adopting the Water System Design Criteria Manual, Wastewater System Design Criteria Manual and
APWA Manual of Standard Specifications (Utah Chapter). Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion to
table. The motion passed 4-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Ershadi and Derasary voting aye.
Administrative Reports:
City Manager Everitt mentioned the recent fires and flooding and the responsiveness of the City staff.
He referred to the report Councilmembers had received from Zacharia Levine, the County's Community
Development Director.
City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Stenta reported that ballots for the mayoral primary election were
mailed. She confirmed that approximately 2,500 ballots were sent to registered voters in Moab.
Mayor and Council Reports:
Mayor Sakrison noted he was asked by Utah Clean Energy to sign on with Rocky Mountain Power and
Utah Clean Energy for solar opportunities. The Mayor cited his reluctance to sign on before examining
the fine print and without the will of the Council. Councilmember Jones said it sounds promising.
Mayor Sakrison next asked about the recycling center. Councilmember Jones stated he attended a board
meeting and requested a tour of the facility. He stated there would be an effort for more active clean-
up, and perhaps engaging volunteers to assist with the cleanup of the facility.
Councilmember Ershadi mentioned she has received complaints from residents of Marcus Court
regarding noise from the adjacent motel parking lot. She noted the residents had been voicing their
concerns for a couple of years without results.
Councilmember Derasary reported she had attended a meeting of the land trust, as well as the Uranium
Mill Tailings Remediation Act (UMTRA) project. She also toured the site of the proposed senior housing
near the Grand Center.
Councilmember Jones reported he had attended a school board workshop on bullying facilitated by
Molly McLish. He also noted the school board is planning to engage in strategic planning. He also
attended a meeting of the Moab Area Watershed Partnership and reported that group would appreciate
the City's engagement.
Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab: Councilmember Derasary moved to pay the bills against the
City of Moab in the amount of $771,690.29. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion
carried 4-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey, Ershadi, Jones and Derasary voting aye.
Mayor Sakrison noted the Wounded Warriors would visit Moab on Sunday and would meet at 2:00 PM
at Lions Park.
Councilmember Jones raised the topic of potential comments for County Council regarding the Transient
July 25, 2017
Page 4 of 5
Page 16 of 171
1-3 Minutes
Page 5 of 5
July 25, 2017
Room Tax. He asked if there was interest on the part of the City to consider the topic or if it should be
left to the County. Mayor Sakrison noted it will be a difficult conversation. City Manager Everitt
discussed whether the proposed legislative changes would get traction. Mayor Sakrison noted St.
George and Washington County may be on board for changes. It was expressed that it was unlikely to be
discussed in the upcoming legislative session.
Adjournment: Councilmember Jones moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Ershadi seconded
the motion. Mayor Sakrison adjourned the meeting at 8:13 PM.
APPROVED: __________________ ATTEST: ___________________
David L. Sakrison, Mayor Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder
Page 17 of 171
#: 6‐1
Title: Approval of Permit and consideration of a fee waiver for the Southeastern Utah
Prevention & Family Fun Night (formerly Recovery Day) Celebration for
Fiscal Impact: Impacts should be minimal
Staff Presenter(s): Carmella Galley
Department: Administration
Applicant: Lanette Denton/ Utah Support Advocates Recovery Awareness
Background/Summary: This is a repeat event located at the Center Street Ball Field. Staff
has reviewed the application and has met with event organizers and do not foresee any
problems with this event. The organizers have requested a fee waiver in the amount not to
exceed $260.00 ($200/Event Fee, $60 Park Fee)
Options: Approve, deny, or modify.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of all items subject to abidance by all
park policies, and the following conditions:
1.Applicant will ensure compliance of No Smoking or Tobacco products at the Center
Street Ball Field.
2.Applicant will ensure that the event ends at 8:00 PM each day.
Recommended Motion: “I move to approve (insert name of agenda item).”
Attachment(s):
•Fee waiver
request
•Event Application
•Park Use
Application
Agenda Summary Sheet
Council Meeting Date: August 8, 2017
Page 18 of 171
Page 19 of 171
Page 20 of 171
Page 21 of 171
Page 22 of 171
Page 23 of 171
Page 24 of 171
#: 6-2
Title: Approval of Permits for Moab Folk Festival/Moab Folk Camp to be held at multiple
venues from October 29, 2017 to November 6, 2017.
Fiscal Impact: This event requires minimal law enforcement yet it does require other city
services for support. The special event, park and beer permit fees provide revenue to the city,
as does the sales tax generated by the purchase of goods and services by the participants of the
event.
Staff Presenter(s): Carmella Galley
Department: Administration
Applicant: Melissa Schmaedick/Friends of the Moab Folk Festival
Background/Summary: Friends of the Moab Folk Festival have submitted all of the
required applications to hold the annual Moab Folk Festival/Moab Folk Camp, utilizing the
Center Street Ball Fields, the MARC, Star Hall, Sun Court, and the Grand County High School
and Three Dogs and A Moose. The Moab Folk Camp will be conducting workshops at the
MARC and Three Dogs and A Moose. The Moab Folk Festival is a long-standing event with
established protocols and procedures. This event rarely generates complaints and is well-run.
The event provides broad-based benefits to the community, justifying use of the Center Street
Ball Fields for the event.
Please note that several of the required/permits are contingent upon other approvals. The
following approvals are needed:
1. Approval of a Special Event License
2. Approval of a Park Use Permit for Center Street Ball Fields
3. Approval of a Park Use Permit for Sun Court
4. Conditional Approval of a Park Alcohol Permit for Center Street Ball Fields
5. Approval of a Class IV Special Event Beer License
6. Granting of Local Consent for a state-issued Special Event Beer Permit
The City Special Events Committee has reviewed the applications for the required permits and
licenses for the Moab Folk Festival/Moab Folk Camp. We have conferred with the coordinator
for the event and are of the opinion that all issues have been or will be adequately dealt with.
Agenda Summary Sheet Council Meeting Date: August 8, 2017
Page 25 of 171
Approval of the Park Alcohol Permit should be conditioned upon securing state approval of the
Special Event Beer Permit and submitting said permit and documentation to the City.
Options: For each item, the Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny or
postpone the item.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of all items with the following
conditions:
1. A vendor list is provided seven days prior to the event and an updated list is provided
within seven days after the event.
2. All fees must be paid seven days prior to the event. This excludes water needs that will
be assessed at the time of use.
3. Approval of the Park Alcohol permit is conditional upon applicant securing state
approval of the Special Event Beer Permit.
Recommended Motion: “I move to approve the requested permits for the Moab Folk
Festival and Moab Folk Camp subject to the three conditions outlined in the Agenda Summary.
Attachment(s):
Special Event License Application
Application for the Special Use of City Parks
Park Alcohol Permit Application
Class IV Special Event Beer License Application
Application for Local Consent for a Special Event Beer Permit
Page 26 of 171
Page 27 of 171
Page 28 of 171
Page 29 of 171
Page 30 of 171
Page 31 of 171
Page 32 of 171
Page 33 of 171
Page 34 of 171
Page 35 of 171
Page 36 of 171
Page 37 of 171
Page 38 of 171
Page 39 of 171
Page 40 of 171
Page 41 of 171
Page 42 of 171
Page 43 of 171
Page 44 of 171
Page 45 of 171
Moab City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: August 8, 2017
#: 6-3
Title: Approval of a Vendor License for Tim Buckingham, d.b.a. Atomic Coffee,
located at 1393 N Highwayl 91 for a term of August 9, 2017 to November 30,
2017
Date Submitted: July 31, 2017
Staff Presenter: Jennie Ross, Treasurer
Department: Treasurer /Planning
Background/Summary:
This applicant is seeking approval for a Private Property Food Vendor license
located on the property at 1393 N Highway 191 next to the Atomic Grill &
Lounge. The applicant is requesting an exception for the hours of operation.
Code section 5.64.050(7) states, "The hours of operation shall be limited to
7:00 am to 10:00 pm". The applicant is requesting an exception to open at
6:00 am to accommodate the morning traffic on the Northern end corridor.
Options: Approve, deny, or modify.
Staff Recommendation: City staff recommends approval of a Private
Property Vendor License, subject to the following conditions:
1.Approve the requested exception for the hours of operation from
6:00 am to 2:00 pm.
2.All required inspections as listed in the Vendor Application.
Recommended Motion: "I move to approve a food vendor license for Tim
Buckingham, d.b.a. Atomic Coffee to be located at 1393 N Highway 191."
Attachment(s): Vendor Application
Page 46 of 171
Page 47 of 171
Page 48 of 171
Page 49 of 171
Page 50 of 171
Page 51 of 171
Page 52 of 171
Page 53 of 171
Page 54 of 171
Page 55 of 171
Page 56 of 171
Page 57 of 171
Page 58 of 171
Page 59 of 171
Page 60 of 171
Moab City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: August 8, 2017
#: 6-4
Title: Approval of a Solicitor's License for Liisi Jantra, d.b.a. The Book Girl, to
conduct residential area door-to-door sales.
Date Submitted: July 26, 2017
Staff Presenter: Jennie Ross, Treasurer
Department: Treasurer
Background/Summary:
This applicant is seeking approval for a Solicitor's License for door-to door
sales of educational books and subscriptions. Liisi is a college exchange
student from Estonia. She is an independent contractor, running her own
business selling educational systems to families. The term for a solicitor
license is one year, but Liisa will be going back to Estonia in September 2017.
Options: Approve, deny, or modify.
Staff Recommendation: City staff recommends approval of a Solicitor's
License with the following condition:
1.Hours of solicition not before 8:00 am and not past 9:00 pm as per
code section 5.14.020(83)
Recommended Motion: "I move to approve a Solicitor's License for Liisi
Jantra, d.b.a. The Book Girl to conduct residential area door-to-door sales."
Attachment( s): Solicitor Application
Page 61 of 171
Page 62 of 171
Page 63 of 171
Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: August 8, 2017
#:8-1
Title:
Date Submitted: July 18, 2017
Staff Presenter: Mark Jolissaint, Staff Engineer
Attachment(s): Proposed Resolution #46-2017
Options: Approve, deny, or modify.
Recommended Motion: I move to adopt the “Resolution Adopting the Water System Design Criteria Manual, Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual, And APWA Manual of Standard Specifications (Utah Chapter).”
Background/Summary: The resolution was tabled at the July 25, 2017 council meeting so that revisions could be made to the Water System Design Criteria Manual and Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual. A summary of these revisions is attached.
Page 64 of 171
Summary of Revisions to the Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria
Manual and Water System Design Criteria Manual since the July 25, 2017 City
Council Meeting.
P Previous
R Revised
Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual
Section 1.4: City Engineer will have authority to make minor revisions to the manual. Previous
wording was ambiguous as to who had this authority.
P Policies and criteria may be amended as new technology is developed or if experience
gained in the use of these Criteria indicates a need for revision. All technical criteria and
policy changes must be recommended by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Minor
revisions will require the approval of the City. All major revisions will require adoption, by
resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The City Engineer and Public Works Director
shall monitor the performance and effectiveness of these Criteria and will recommend
amendments and revisions as needed.
R Policies and criteria may be amended as new technology is developed or if experience gained
in the use of these Criteria indicates a need for revision. All technical criteria and policy
changes must be recommended by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Minor
revisions will require the approval of the City. All major revisions will require adoption, by
resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The City Engineer may approve minor revisions
and technical changes.
Section 1.14: Examples of Graywater were updated to include those effluents described in Utah
Administrative Code {R317-401-2 (a)}.
P GRAY WATER shall mean untreated wastewater that has not been in contact with toilet water
that is applied below the ground surface for irrigation.
R GRAY WATER shall mean untreated wastewater, which has not come into contact with toilet
waste. Graywater includes wastewater from bathtubs, showers, bathroom washbasins,
clothes washing machines, laundry tubs, etc., and does not include wastewater from kitchen
sinks, photo lab sinks, dishwashers, garage floor drains, or other hazardous chemicals.
Page 65 of 171
Section 2.4: Length of warranty period was unclear. Text now refers developers to the warranty
requirements included in the Development Improvement Agreement (DIA).
P Prior to placing the facilities into service and initial acceptance by the City, all construction
related provisions required by the City shall be satisfied, including startup procedures,
inspections and testing of the facilities, and receipt of O&M Manuals and Record Drawings.
Additionally, all requirements and responsibilities shall be complied with in association with
the warranty period as set forth in the City’s Regulations (not to be less than 1 year).
R Prior to placing the facilities into service and initial acceptance by the City, all construction
related provisions required by the City shall be satisfied, including startup procedures,
inspections and testing of the facilities, and receipt of O&M Manuals and Record Drawings.
Additionally, the developer shall comply with warranty requirements included in the
Developments Improvements Agreement (DIA).
Section 4.4.11: The City Engineer may approve a variance to the requirement that there be a
sanitary sewer service line for each individual unit in multi-family residences. Previous text
made no explicit allowance for this variance.
P All single family residential dwellings, each individual unit in multi-family complexes, and each
commercial business and industrial customer shall be served by a separate, independent
sanitary sewer service line.
R All single family residential dwellings, each individual unit in multi-family complexes, and each
commercial business and industrial customer shall be served by a separate, independent
sanitary sewer service line. The City Engineer may approve the use of a single service line for
multi-family residences.
Water System Design Criteria Manual
Section 1.4: City Engineer will have authority to make minor revisions to the manual. Previous
wording was ambiguous as to who had this authority.
P Policies and criteria may be amended as new technology is developed or if experience gained
in the use of these Criteria indicates a need for revision. All technical criteria and policy
changes must be reviewed by the City Engineer and Public Works Director or their assignees.
All major revisions will require adoption, by resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The
City shall monitor the performance and effectiveness of these Criteria and will recommend
amendments and revisions as needed.
Page 66 of 171
R Policies and criteria may be amended as new technology is developed or if experience gained
in the use of these Criteria indicates a need for revision. All technical criteria and policy
changes must be recommended by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Minor
revisions will require the approval of the City. All major revisions will require adoption, by
resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The City Engineer may approve minor revisions
and technical changes.
Section 5.1.1: The City has the option to take on lead design and construction of accessory
facilities, or pass this responsibility on to the developer. The previous text more strongly
mandated this responsibility to the city.
P It is not anticipated that developers will be involved in the design or construction of wells,
pump stations, storage tanks or water treatment systems. The City will assume the lead
design role for these facilities unless otherwise negotiated with a developer. Design of these
facilities will be in accordance with the State of Utah Administrative Rules {R309 U.A.C} and
the applicable building codes.
R All distribution and transmission lines, and all other piping and fittings shall be flushed,
pressure and leak tested and disinfected. After disinfection, bacteriological samples shall be
taken from the lines. Pressure testing shall be in accordance with AWWA Standard C600-10.
Disinfection and bacteriological testing of facilities shall be in accordance with AWWA
Standard C651-05. Water lines and facilities shall not be connected to the public water
system until the bacteriological tests indicate that the water is free from contamination.
Page 67 of 171
CITY OF MOAB
RESOLUTION #46-2017
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL,
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL, AND APWA
MANUAL OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (UTAH CHAPTER)
WHEREAS, the City, to maintain the quality of new infrastructure improvements, desired to assess and
update its minimum criteria and standards for said improvements; and,
WHEREAS, the Moab City Council (Council) approved Ordinance No. 2017-02, a temporary moratorium
on new commercial site plan applications pending the revision of city ordinances relating to said criteria
and standards; and,
WHEREAS, with the aid of a consultant, Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc., appropriate criteria and standards
were developed or selected from existing sources.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it Resolved by the Moab City Council, that the Water System Design Criteria
Manual, Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual, and APWA Manual of Standard
Specifications (Utah Chapter) are adopted.
PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City
Council on _______ __, 2017.
SIGNED:
______________________________
David L. Sakrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Rachel Stenta, Recorder
Page 68 of 171
WASTEWATER COLLECTION
SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL
Effective Date: July 26, 2017
Page 69 of 171
Contents
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Jurisdiction .............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.4 Amendments and Revisions .................................................................................................................... 1
1.5 Enforcement Responsibility .................................................................................................................... 2
1.6 Review and Acceptance .......................................................................................................................... 2
1.7 Interpretation.......................................................................................................................................... 2
1.8 Relationship to Other Standards ............................................................................................................. 3
1.8.1 State Public Wastewater System Code and Rules .................................................................... 3
1.8.2 State Construction Code ........................................................................................................... 3
1.9 Variances from these Criteria ................................................................................................................. 3
1.10 Adoption of the Utah Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans
and Specifications ......................................................................................................................................... 3
1.11 Gray Water Irrigation Systems .............................................................................................................. 3
1.12 Special Wastes and Industrial Pre-Treatment ...................................................................................... 4
1.13 Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................. 5
1.14 Definitions of Terms .............................................................................................................................. 6
2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 9
2.2 Planning Policy ........................................................................................................................................ 9
2.3 Design Policy ........................................................................................................................................... 9
2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy .......................................................................................... 9
2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy ........................................................................................... 10
2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy ..................................................................................................... 10
2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy ...................................................................................... 10
2.8 Duty of the Engineer Preparing Development Documents .................................................................. 11
3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 12
3.2 Review Process ...................................................................................................................................... 12
3.2.1 Pre-Application Consultation ......................................................................................................... 12
3.2.2 Wastewater Utility Report Requirements ..................................................................................... 12
3.2.2.1 Format ..................................................................................................................................... 12
Page 70 of 171
3.2.2.2 Stand-Alone Document ........................................................................................................... 12
3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy ................................................................................................................ 13
3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies .......................................................................................................... 13
3.3 Acceptance ............................................................................................................................................ 13
3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction .............................................................................. 13
3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report ................................................................................... 13
3.4 Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report ................................................................................................. 13
3.4.1 Wastewater System Modeling ....................................................................................................... 16
3.5. City Designation of Connection Points ................................................................................................. 16
3.6. Geotechnical Investigation and Report ............................................................................................... 16
3.7 Final Wastewater Utility Report ........................................................................................................... 16
3.7.1 Wastewater System Modeling ....................................................................................................... 19
3.7.2 Disclaimer ....................................................................................................................................... 19
3.8 Construction Drawings ......................................................................................................................... 19
3.8.1 Wastewater System Improvements .............................................................................................. 19
3.8.2 Indemnification Statement ............................................................................................................ 19
3.8.3 Construction Drawing Requirements ............................................................................................. 20
3.8.3.1 Wastewater Utility Construction Drawings ............................................................................ 20
3.9 Record Drawings ................................................................................................................................... 22
4.1 Design Criteria - Reference Design Documents .................................................................................... 23
4.2 Prohibited Installations ......................................................................................................................... 23
4.3 Unlawful Connections ........................................................................................................................... 23
4.4 Minimum Wastewater System Design Criteria ..................................................................................... 24
4.4.1 Design Flows .................................................................................................................................. 24
4.4.2 Hydraulic Design ............................................................................................................................ 24
4.4.3 Pipe Sizes and Grades .................................................................................................................... 25
4.4.4 Selection of Pipe Material .............................................................................................................. 25
4.4.5 General Wastewater System Layout Criteria ................................................................................. 25
4.4.5.1 Location ................................................................................................................................... 25
4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout .................................................................................................................... 25
4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout ........................................................................................................................ 26
4.4.5.4 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing a Water Main.......................................................................... 26
Page 71 of 171
4.4.5.5 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing of a Storm Drain ..................................................................... 26
4.4.5.6 Limits on Minimum Vertical Clearance ................................................................................... 26
4.4.6 Bored Crossings .............................................................................................................................. 26
4.4.7 Manholes ....................................................................................................................................... 27
4.4.7.1 Layout ...................................................................................................................................... 27
4.4.7.2 Manhole Sizing ........................................................................................................................ 28
4.4.7.3 Drop Manholes ....................................................................................................................... 28
4.4.7.4 Main Connections to Existing Manholes ................................................................................. 29
4.4.7.5 Sanitary Sewers and Manholes Greater than 20 Feet ............................................................ 29
4.4.8 Inverted Wastewater Siphons ....................................................................................................... 29
4.4.9 Fill Areas ......................................................................................................................................... 29
4.4.10 Future Connections ...................................................................................................................... 29
4.4.11 Sanitary Sewer Service Lines ........................................................................................................ 29
4.4.12.1 Ownership ................................................................................................................................. 29
4.4.12.2 Layout.................................................................................................................................... 30
4.4.12.3 Cleanouts .............................................................................................................................. 30
4.4.12.4 Structural Requirements ....................................................................................................... 30
4.5 Easements ............................................................................................................................................. 30
4.6 Sand/Oil and Grease Interceptors ........................................................................................................ 31
5.1 Sewage Pump Stations (Lift Stations) and Force Mains ........................................................................ 32
5.1.1 Scope .............................................................................................................................................. 32
5.1.2 Compliance with State of Utah Standards ..................................................................................... 32
5.1.3 City Review and Approval .............................................................................................................. 32
5.1.4 Flood Protection............................................................................................................................. 32
5.1.5 Accessibility and Security ............................................................................................................... 32
5.1.6 Grit ................................................................................................................................................. 32
5.1.7 Station Ventilation ......................................................................................................................... 32
5.1.8 Odor Control .................................................................................................................................. 33
5.2 Minimum Lift Station Design Criteria .................................................................................................... 33
5.3 Pump Equipment and Protection ......................................................................................................... 34
5.3.1 Pump Characteristics ..................................................................................................................... 34
5.3.2 Pump Protection ............................................................................................................................ 35
Page 72 of 171
5.4 Overflow Basins .................................................................................................................................... 35
5.5 Force Main Design Criteria .................................................................................................................... 35
5.5.1 Pipe Materials ................................................................................................................................ 35
5.5.2 Velocity and Pipe Diameter ........................................................................................................... 35
5.5.3 Pipe and Design Pressure ............................................................................................................... 35
5.5.4 Shutoff and Check Valves ............................................................................................................... 35
5.5.5 Isolation Valves .............................................................................................................................. 36
5.5.6 Combination Air Release and Air/Vacuum Valves ......................................................................... 36
5.5.7 Drain Valves ................................................................................................................................... 36
5.5.8 Cleanouts ....................................................................................................................................... 36
5.5.9 Termination .................................................................................................................................... 36
5.5.10 Identification ................................................................................................................................ 36
Page 73 of 171
1.1 Introduction
These criteria and design standards together with all future amendments shall be known as the
The City of Moab Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual (hereafter called
“Criteria”). All utility reports and plans, analyses, and designs, submitted as a requirement of the
City of Moab Regulations (hereafter called “Regulations”), shall comply with these Criteria.
1.2 Jurisdiction
These Criteria shall apply to all land within the incorporated area of the City of Moab, or served
by the City, including any public lands. These Criteria shall apply to all systems and facilities
constructed in or on City Rights-of-Way, easements dedicated for utilities across public or
private property, easements for public use, and to all privately owned and maintained system
facilities.
1.3 Purpose
Presented in these Criteria are the policies and minimum technical criteria for the planning,
analysis and design of wastewater collection systems within the boundaries of the City of Moab
and areas served by the City. All subdivisions, site plans or any other proposed construction
submitted for acceptance under the provisions of the Regulations shall include adequate and
appropriate wastewater system planning, analysis, and design. Such planning, analysis, and
design shall conform with or exceed the Criteria set forth herein. Wastewater collection system
planning, analysis, and design that require policies and technical expertise not specifically
addressed in these Criteria shall follow the provisions of the Utah State Code and Utah Code
Annotated. In the event of a conflict, the State of Utah Codes and Rules will prevail.
Interpretation will be provided by the City of Moab and/or the Utah Department of
Environmental Quality, Division of Water Quality.
1.4 Amendments and Revisions
Policies and criteria may be amended as new technology is developed or if experience gained in
the use of these Criteria indicates a need for revision. All technical criteria and policy changes
must be recommended by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Minor revisions will
require the approval of the City. All major revisions will require adoption, by resolution or
ordinance of the City Council. The City Engineer may approve minor revisions and technical
changes.
Page 74 of 171
TABLE 1-1 EXAMPLES OF MINOR AND MAJOR REVISIONS
MINOR MAJOR
Grammar Policy Changes
Submittal Requirements
Clarifications
Construction Detail Revisions for
clarification, minor modification
Technical Criteria Changes
1.5 Enforcement Responsibility
The City shall review all wastewater system reports, plans, analyses, and designs, submitted as a
requirement of the Regulations, for compliance with these Criteria. The Regulations are enforced
by the City of Moab and authorized representatives.
1.6 Review and Acceptance
The City shall review all submittals for general compliance with these Criteria. An acceptance by
the City does not relieve the Owner, Engineer, or Designer from the responsibility of ensuring
that the design, calculations, plans, specifications, construction, and record drawings are in
compliance with these Criteria, and in compliance with other applicable State and Federal
regulations.
The City may, but is not required to, refer submittals to other agencies that have an interest or
responsibility for wastewater system issues. Other review agencies may include regional, State,
or Federal agencies responsible for wastewater collection, industrial pretreatment, treatment and
other wastewater related issues.
1.7 Interpretation
In the interpretation and application of these Criteria, the provisions shall be regarded as the
minimum requirements for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare of the residents
of the City. These Criteria shall therefore be regarded as remedial and shall be liberally construed
to further its underlying purposes.
Whenever a provision of these Criteria and any other provision of the Regulations or any
provision in any law, ordinance, resolution, rule or regulation of any kind, contains any
requirement(s) covering any of the same subject matter, the requirements that are more
restrictive or impose higher standards shall govern, as determined by the City.
Page 75 of 171
These Criteria shall not abrogate or annul any binding agreements, Development Improvement
Agreements, easements, permits, utility reports or construction drawings accepted by the City
prior to the effective date of these Criteria.
1.8 Relationship to Other Standards
1.8.1 State Public Wastewater System Code and Rules
Public wastewater systems in the State of Utah are governed by the State of Utah Code,
Annotated and the Utah Administrative Code. These codes and rules apply to policy, planning,
criteria and construction of public water facilities and prevail if a conflict exists within the
Criteria.
1.8.2 State Construction Code
The State of Utah Construction codes and rules, with amendments, are incorporated by reference.
These codes and rules apply to policy, planning, criteria and construction of public wastewater
facilities and prevail if a conflict exists within the Criteria.
1.9 Variances from these Criteria
Modifications to these Criteria shall require a formal variance request. Variances from the
provisions of these Criteria may be considered on a case-by-case basis for specific
applications only, and shall not establish a precedent for any other project or future
development.
1.10 Adoption of the Utah Chapter of the American Public Works
Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications
The latest Utah APWA Manual of Standard Plans and Manual of Standard Specifications and
drawings are hereby adopted as the City of Moab Standard Details and Standard Specifications
for wastewater system improvements. Variance from these standards must be approved by the
City. In the event that multiple standards or sections of the standard apply, the City will
determine the applicable standard.
1.11 Gray Water Irrigation Systems
Gray water irrigation systems within the City of Moab are regulated by the Southeastern Utah
Health Department (Health Department). Application for graywater systems must be made to
the Health Department. Graywater systems must comply with Health Department requirements
and the Utah Administrative Code {R317-401 U.A.C.}.
Page 76 of 171
1.12 Special Wastes and Industrial Pre-Treatment
The City shall be notified of any potential waste streams that are different than typical residential
wastes in quantity or characteristics. Specifically, the following pollutants are prohibited:
• Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the City wastewater treatment plant
(WWTP) or collection system, including, but not limited to, waste streams with a closed
cup flashpoint of less than 140°F (60°C);
• Pollutants which will cause corrosive structural damage to the WWTP or collection
system. Discharges with a pH lower than 5.0 or greater than 10 are prohibited;
• Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which will cause obstruction to the flow in the
system resulting in interference;
• Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (BOD, etc.) released in a
discharge at such volume or strength as to cause interference in the WWTP or collection
system;
• Heat in amounts, which will inhibit biological activity in the WWTP, resulting in
interference, but in no case, heat in such quantities that the influent to the sewage
treatment works exceeds 104°F (40°C);
• Petroleum oil, nonbiodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts
that will cause interference or pass through;
• Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapor, or fumes within the WWTP
or collection system in a quantity that may cause health or safety problems;
• Any trucked or hauled pollutants, except at discharge points designated by the WWP; or
• Any substance that contains concentrations of constituents greater than those specified in
Table 1-2.
TABLE 1-2 LIMITS TO WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATION (mg/L)
Total solids (TS) 600
Volatile solids 300
Total suspended solids (TSS) 250
Volatile suspended solids 200
5-day Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 ) 200
Chemical oxygen demand (COD) 500
Total Nitrogen (TN) 60
Ammonia (NH 4 ) 10
Total Phosphorus (TP) 10
Page 77 of 171
These special wastes may require pre-treatment, which includes providing any necessary
treatment technology, equipment, disposal, and expert operators necessary for proper treatment.
This proper treatment includes all resources necessary such that the waste stream delivered to the
City of Moab wastewater collection and treatment facilities meets the above criteria and is
acceptable to the City. The waste stream may not cause or facilitate violation of the facility’s
Utah Division of Water Quality discharge permit, volume and flowrate capacities and processing
limitations. The developer/owner must meet with the City prior to connection to determine the
specific requirements for special wastes.
1.13 Acronyms
As used in this Manual, the following acronyms shall
apply:
ANSI American National Standards Institute
APWA American Public Works Association
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BOP Bottom of Pipe
CD and CDs Construction Drawing(s)
DIA Development Improvement Agreement
HP High Point
IPC International Plumbing Code
IRC International Residential Code
LP Low Point
Max Maximum
Min Minimum
MDD Maximum Day Demand
MG Million Gallons
MGD Million Gallons per Day
NAVD North American Vertical Datum
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PDF Peak Design Flow or Portable Document Format
PE Professional Engineer
PSI Pounds per Square Inch
PVC Polyvinyl Chloride
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
TOP Top of Pipe
OWTS On-Site Wastewater Treatment System
Page 78 of 171
1.14 Definitions of Terms
CITY shall mean the City of Moab, Utah.
CITY COUNCIL means the Moab City Council.
CITY ENGINEER shall mean the City of Moab Engineer or other authorized representative of
the Engineering Department.
CODE or MUNICIPAL CODE shall mean the City of Moab Municipal Code, as amended.
CONSTRUCTION DRAWING(S) (CD or CDs) shall mean Construction Drawings prepared by
a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Utah for the Developer and approved by the City
depicting Public and/or Private Improvements to be constructed for the Project.
CRITERIA or DESIGN CRITERIA shall mean the design criteria and requirements contained
herein for wastewater facilities to be constructed in the City.
DETAILS or STANDARD DETAILS shall mean details issued by City to be used or referenced
in the Construction Drawings.
DEVELOPER shall mean the party or parties desiring to construct Public and/or Private
Improvements within City rights-of-way or easements, securing all required approvals and
permits from the City and other applicable entities, and assuming full and complete
responsibility for the Project.
DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (DIA) shall mean a formal agreement
between a Developer and the City that addresses development conditions and obligations.
EASEMENT shall mean the right of the City to use lands owned by a another party for the
purposes of maintenance, access, utilities, drainage or other use, as specified in an agreement
between the City and the other party.
ENGINEER shall mean the Professional Engineer retained by the Developer responsible for the
creation and submission of utility reports and construction drawings to the City for approval for
the purpose of one-time construction of facilities.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT shall mean the City of Moab Engineering Department.
GRAY WATER shall mean untreated wastewater, which has not come into contact with toilet
waste. Graywater includes wastewater from bathtubs, showers, bathroom washbasins, clothes
Page 79 of 171
washing machines, laundry tubs, etc., and does not include wastewater from kitchen sinks, photo
lab sinks, dishwashers, garage floor drains, or other hazardous chemicals
LIFT STATION shall mean a sewage pumping station.
MUNICIPAL CODE – See CODE.
OWNER shall mean the person(s) in title to any portion of the Property, according to the records
of the Grand County Clerk and Recorder. The use of the singular “Owner” shall refer to all
Owners of the Property.
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those improvements not identified as Public
Improvements, and which are not generally installed within the City rights-of-way, easements, or
other City-owned lands.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER shall mean an individual currently registered with the Utah
Division of Professional and Occupational Licensing as a professional engineer.
PROJECT shall mean the Public or Private Improvements as designated in the approved
Construction Drawings to be constructed in conformance with these Design Criteria. The Project
is inclusive of any and all Public or Private Improvement Projects for or within the City, whether
Development Projects, Private Utility Projects, Capital Improvement Projects or other types of
projects.
PROPERTY shall mean the real property located in the City of Moab.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those public facilities including, but not limited to,
pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian/bike/equestrian paths, storm drain facilities with
related appurtenances, culverts, channels, bridges, water distribution, transmission and storage
facilities with related appurtenances, wastewater collection facilities with related appurtenances,
water purification facilities, pavement markings/signage/striping, traffic signals and related
appurtenances, and those processes integral to construction of other Public Improvements listed
herein, which upon their completion are to be dedicated to the City for operation and
maintenance by the City and which are installed within the City rights-of-way, easements, or
other City-owned lands.
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR shall mean the City of Moab Public Works Director
REGULATIONS shall mean the Charter, ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the
City, including the Code, and other provisions of all zoning, subdivision and building codes or
Page 80 of 171
any other applicable design criteria adopted by the City, as the same may be amended
periodically and applied uniformly throughout the City.
SHALL shall mean a mandatory requirement or condition, as approved by the City.
STANDARD DETAILS – See DETAILS.
VARIANCE REQUEST shall mean a formal request with adequate documentation and
justification for a variance from the standards, provisions, policies or submittal requirements set
forth in these Design Criteria that meets the requirements in Section 1.9 of these Design Criteria.
WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN shall mean the City of Moab Wastewater Master Plan.
Page 81 of 171
2.1 Introduction
Provisions for adequate service, wastewater collection and treatment are necessary to preserve
and promote the general health, welfare, and economic well-being of the residents of the City of
Moab. The City of Moab must provide coordination, review, and master planning of the system
in order that the integration of each component of the system meets the intent and purpose of the
system as a whole. The development of the City’s wastewater system is governed by the policies
provided below, as facilitated through the implementation of the Criteria contained herein.
2.2 Planning Policy
All developments on land within the City that are served by the City’s public wastewater system
shall provide planning and design for wastewater loadings, including peaking factors. Reports
and plans shall be submitted for all new development and redevelopment within the City
jurisdiction. These reports shall conform to the requirements set forth herein and the provisions
otherwise stipulated by the City during the development process. Redevelopment shall be
defined as any land disturbance or reconstruction that results in a reconfiguration of existing
wastewater system facilities or an increase in demands.
During the initial planning stages of the development, a pre-application meeting shall be
coordinated with the City. One purpose of this meeting is to assist the City and the developer to
determine the level of wastewater service that is available and needed by the developer.
2.3 Design Policy
Wastewater system planning and design within the City shall adhere to the Criteria contained
herein, the administrative rules promulgated by the Utah Division of Water Quality, the Utah
Division of Water Rights (as related to return flows) and acceptance procedures of the City.
Prohibited facilities and connections shall be as described in these Criteria.
2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy
The construction of improvements for and within the City shall conform to the City’s
construction permit, standard details and approved plans, and shall adhere to all City, County,
State, and Federal regulations applicable to the work. This shall include the acquisition of all
necessary permits, which may include, but not be limited to, stream alteration permits, discharge
permits, road cut permits, flood plain related permits and letters (including FEMA review and
approval when applicable), Utah Division of Water Quality approvals, traffic control permits
and all other required permits and approvals. At the completion of construction, all permits and
service agreements with power companies and any other private utilities shall be transferred into
the Developer’s name, and shall under no circumstances be transferred to, or held in the name of
Page 82 of 171
the City, unless the City is the customer. Any work proposed to take place within existing City of
Moab streets must be reviewed and approved by the City. The type of crossing allowed, traffic
control, street repair specifications, etc. shall be as determined by the City.
Prior to placing the facilities into service and initial acceptance by the City, all construction
related provisions required by the City shall be satisfied, including startup procedures,
inspections and testing of the facilities, and receipt of O&M Manuals and Record Drawings.
Additionally, the developer shall comply with warranty requirements included in the
Developments Improvements Agreement (DIA).
2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy
The delineation between City-owned and privately owned portions of the system and the
associated maintenance responsibilities for each, shall be as set forth in the latest editions of the
Municipal Code and Standard Details. Upon execution of Final Acceptance, sanitary sewers,
force mains, lift stations, and all appurtenant City-owned facilities, shall become the sole
property of the City, and full legal and equitable title thereto shall be vested in the City free and
clear of any liens, claims or rights of any third party in or to the Public Improvements.
2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy
The design of all wastewater system facilities within the City must provide for access and long-
term operation and maintenance of the facilities by the City. Operation and Maintenance manuals
associated with all components to be installed as part of the wastewater system shall be provided
to the City with the Record Drawings, unless otherwise specifically waived by the City.
Utility easements or tracts and access easements shall be provided for all wastewater system
facilities outside of public right-of-way as set forth in these Criteria, or as otherwise required by
the City, and shall be adequate for the operation, maintenance and replacement of the facilities.
2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy
Public safety and the protection of City staff shall be an essential objective when planning,
designing, constructing, operating and maintaining the City’s wastewater collection system
facilities. All such facilities shall be designed with careful consideration of the potential hazards
associated with the use and long-term operation and maintenance of the facility. The design
phase of all projects shall evaluate the health and safety risks associated with the facilities, and
shall include appropriate design features to minimize these risks and to adequately protect the
general public and City personnel from the hazards. Equipment for confined space entry in
accordance with OSHA and other applicable regulatory agency requirements shall be provided at
all City of Moab facilities, as required. Hatches with fall prevention covers, intermediate
Page 83 of 171
platforms, handrails, safety lighting, ventilation etc. shall be as required by the City, or any
applicable code.
2.8 Duty of the Engineer Preparing Development Documents
These standards establish criteria and policies for the design and subsequent construction of the
City’s public wastewater system. These standards are not intended to substitute for engineering
knowledge, judgement or experience. It is the responsibility of the design (development)
Engineer to understand and apply sound engineering principals related to public wastewater
systems to the planning, design and construction of wastewater system improvements. It is also
the responsibility of the Engineer to understand all federal, state and local regulations related to
the public wastewater system.
These criteria should be reviewed by the Engineer, who shall evaluate their applicability. If the
Engineer identifies criteria that are inapplicable or inappropriate in a specific location or specific
situation, the engineer shall bring the issue to the attention of the City.
Page 84 of 171
3.1 Introduction
The requirements presented in this chapter shall be used to aid the Engineer or Applicant in the
preparation of utility reports, modeling evaluations, and Construction Drawings for wastewater
system facilities. This Chapter applies primarily to submittal requirements for wastewater
collection systems and the associated Criteria provided in Chapter 4. The requirements
presented herein are the minimum necessary, and will be used to evaluate the adequacy of all
submittals made to the City.
3.2 Review Process
3.2.1 Pre-Application Consultation
A pre-application consultation with the City of Moab Planning Department is strongly
encouraged for any type of development or redevelopment. The purpose of this meeting is to
discuss general information about the project, pertinent aspects of the Criteria, the required scope
of the utility reports, and any special procedures, analyses, and submittal requirements that may
be applicable.
3.2.2 Wastewater Utility Report Requirements
Preliminary and final wastewater utility reports shall be provided to the City of Moab. The
purpose of the preliminary wastewater utility report is to identify existing wastewater
infrastructure, provide preliminary estimates of wastewater loading, provide an initial plan for
wastewater infrastructure and determine the feasibility of providing wastewater service to the
development via the public wastewater collection system. The purpose of the final wastewater
utility report, which is to be submitted with the final construction plans, is to identify the final
wastewater infrastructure plan.
3.2.2.1 Format
All required reports shall be prepared on 8½" x 11” paper (except that maps and figures shall
generally be 11” x 17” or larger) and be bound, and shall follow the format contained in the
report checklists. Supporting drawings, figures, and tables shall be bound into the reports or
included in an attached pocket. Reports shall include a narrative presenting the project for review
in accordance with the information presented in these Criteria, and the requirements established
by the City for the appropriate submittal.
Paper and electronic (PDF) copies of the report shall be provided. Electronic files of computer
models and GIS files shall be provided if requested by the City.
3.2.2.2 Stand-Alone Document
The wastewater utility reports shall be stand-alone documents. When references are made or
assumptions are based on previously submitted reports, the reports must include the appropriate
Page 85 of 171
excerpts, pages, tables, and maps containing the referenced information. Assumptions made in
previous reports must be verified and substantiated in subsequent reports. Reports shall be
legible.
3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy
Any report with incomplete or missing information shall result in the report being returned
without review. The City reserves the right to require additional information beyond that
specifically required in these Criteria.
3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies
The review and approval of the project by State, Federal, and local agencies other than the City,
shall be the responsibility of the Developer. The Developer shall be required to address all
referral agency comments, and to have such comments incorporated into the applicable utility
report and plans submitted to the City.
3.3 Acceptance
3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction
The final wastewater utility report shall conform to the construction documents used to bid the
project, and shall be approved by the City prior to the construction of any wastewater system
improvements.
3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report
The approval of the final wastewater utility report shall expire simultaneously with the expiration
of the approval of the project unless extended in conformance with the provisions of the
Municipal Code. At the time the approval of the final utility report expires, the report shall be
deemed invalid and a resubmittal will be required. In order to be re-approved, it must be
demonstrated that the concepts, designs, and calculations presented in the report are consistent
with the City’s current Criteria.
3.4 Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report
The Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report shall review and discuss the existing wastewater
system infrastructure and the wastewater needs of the development. The report shall also
identify the existing infrastructure needed to support the development. The City Engineering
Department and Public Works Department will coordinate with the developer to provide the
wastewater system data needed as an input to the Engineer’s design.
Page 86 of 171
The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Preliminary
Wastewater Utility Report that shall be submitted:
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Name of Project, including legal name of development.
B. Address.
C. Owner.
D. Developer.
E. Engineer.
F. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable.
II. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
A. Site Location.
1. Site Vicinity Map.
2. Township, Range, Section, and ¼ Section.
3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development.
4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments.
B. Description of Property and Land Use.
1. Total area in acres.
2. Total number of equivalent residential units (ERUs) proposed for the
development at build-out with a breakdown of units by type projected by
phase (if applicable) calculated by utilizing the Utah Administrative Code
Minimum Sizing Requirements {R317 U.A.C.}.
3. Area (acres) and land use for all parcels to be served within the
development boundaries.
4. Major and minor drainages and floodplains, including FEMA desigations.
5. Existing irrigation canals or ditches.
6. Significant geologic features and topography.
7. Existing On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS).
8. Existing water wells.
9. Easements/tracts may not be known initially; however, provide a
statement that easements or tracts necessary for utilities will be provided
at time of preliminary site plan, in accordance with City standards
regarding location and size of easements and tracts.
Page 87 of 171
III. EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM
A. Existing Collection System.
Discuss the existing sanitary sewers, interceptors, lift stations, and force mains in
the vicinity of the development, including sizes and locations that will serve the
proposed development.
IV. ESTIMATED PROPOSED LOADINGS
A. Average Day Loadings.
Estimated hydraulic and BOD 5 loadings must be provided for all phases of
development. If wastewater is expected to be typical for residential wastewater,
BOD 5 may be assumed to be typical. If typical, this assumption shall be stated in
the report.
B. Peak Loadings.
Estimated peaking factors for hydraulic loadings shall be provided.
C. Special Waste Characteristics (if different from typical residential wastewater).
A detailed listing of special wastewater constituents shall be provided, along with
a detailed description of needed treatment processes. A listing of pre-treatment
processes provided by the project Owner shall be discussed in detail.
V. PROPOSED WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
A. Proposed Collection System.
Provide a general overview of the anticipated collection system layout, and
discuss any extensions from the site to the existing wastewater system that are
necessary to serve the development. The locations and types of pipes, manholes,
clean-outs, and other facilities shall be provided.
B. Proposed Wastewater Facilities.
Discuss any anticipated lift stations, force mains, pretreatment facilities, etc., that
will likely be required to adequately serve the development.
Page 88 of 171
VI. REFERENCES
Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the
report.
3.4.1 Wastewater System Modeling
The City maintains a wastewater system model. Once the preliminary wastewater system report
is received and found to be adequate, the City will determine whether wastewater system
modeling is required. If the modeling is required, the City will determine the level of modeling
needed for the development and will estimate the cost of modeling. The developer will be
responsible for the cost of wastewater system modeling.
3.5. City Designation of Connection Points
If the City of Moab determines that the Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report meets the
requirements set forth in these Criteria, the City will provide wastewater service at designated
tie-in points.
3.6. Geotechnical Investigation and Report
A geotechnical investigation and report is required to provide a basis for wastewater collection
system design. The investigation must include boreholes or excavations to a depth at least 2-feet
deeper than the bottom of the anticipated trench excavation. Samples shall be collected and
analyzed at a geotechnical laboratory to determine soil classification, moisture contents, dry
density, strength, water level (if detected) and corrosion potential. The investigation shall
identify expansive and collapsible soils. The report shall include recommendations for
foundations backfill, utility and trench construction, and compaction. The report shall include a
discussion of the suitability of the on-site soils for use for the intended purposes.
3.7 Final Wastewater Utility Report
The Final Wastewater Utility Report shall describe final wastewater infrastructure, including
final modeling and calculations. The Final Wastewater Utility Report shall be consistent with
final construction drawings.
The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Final
Wastewater Utility Report that shall be submitted with the Construction Documents:
Page 89 of 171
I. TITLE SHEET
A. Name of Project, including legal name of Development.
B. Address.
C. Owner.
D. Developer.
E. Engineer.
F. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable.
II. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
A. Site Location.
1. Site Vicinity Map
2. Township, Range, Section, and 1/4 Section.
3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development.
4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments.
B. Description of Property and Land Use.
1. Total area in acres.
2. Discussion of project phasing, if applicable.
3. Total number of ERUs proposed for the development at build-out with a
breakdown of units by type projected by phase (if applicable).
4. Area (acres), land use for all parcels to be served within the development
boundaries (initial and future phases, if applicable) and number of lots.
5. Sizes of schools, commercial and industrial buildings (initial and future
phases, if applicable).
6. Major and minor drainages and floodplains, including FEMA
designations.
7. Existing irrigation canals or ditches.
8. Significant geologic features and topography.
9. Existing On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS).
10. Existing water wells.
III. CALCULATED FLOWS
A. Average Day Loadings.
Estimated hydraulic and BOD 5 loadings must be provided for all phases of
development. If wastewater is expected to be typical for residential wastewater,
BOD 5 may be assumed to be typical. This shall be stated in the report.
Page 90 of 171
B. Peak Loadings.
Estimated peaking factors for hydraulic loadings shall be provided.
C. Special Waste Characteristics (if different from typical residential wastewater).
A detailed listing of special wastewater constituents shall be provided, along with a
detailed description of needed treatment processes. A listing of pre-treatment
processes provided by the project Owner shall be discussed in detail.
IV. EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM
A. Existing Collection System.
Discuss the existing sanitary sewers, interceptors, lift stations, and force mains in
the vicinity of the development, including sizes and locations that will need to be
extended to serve the proposed development.
V. PROPOSED WASTEWATER SYSTEM
A. Proposed Collection System.
Provide a description of all proposed wastewater facilities and a general overview
of the anticipated collection system layout, including the proposed line sizes.
Describe the tie-ins to the existing wastewater system and the sizes and lengths of
any extensions necessary to serve the development.
B. Proposed Wastewater Facilities.
Discuss any lift stations, force mains, pretreatment facilities, etc., that will likely
be required to adequately serve the development.
C. Land Dedication Requirements.
Generally describe any portions of the proposed wastewater system that are not
planned to be located in public right-of-way, and will therefore require the
dedication of tracts or utility easements to the City.
Page 91 of 171
VI. POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT (DIA) ITEMS
Discuss any potential DIA items such as needed off-site improvements, improvements
necessary for a project or project phase to be independently sustainable, etc.
VII. POTENTIAL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
Generally discuss all foreseeable Federal, State, County, and Local permitting
requirements associated with the project.
XI. REFERENCES
Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the
report.
3.7.1 Wastewater System Modeling
The City maintains a wastewater system model. It is anticipated that wastewater system
modeling will be performed once the Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report is submitted. The
results of the City’s wastewater modeling should be included in the Final Wastewater Utility
Report. The City of Moab should be notified of any changes. The modeling will be used by the
City as needed. The developer will be responsible for the cost of wastewater system modeling.
3.7.2 Disclaimer
The City is not responsible or liable for assumptions made by the Developer regarding utility
information associated with the proposed development.
3.8 Construction Drawings
3.8.1 Wastewater System Improvements
Wastewater system improvements within public rights-of-way or utility easements are required
to be designed, approved, and constructed in accordance with the City’s Regulations, subdivision
requirements of the Municipal Code, the City’s Design Criteria and Standard Details, sound
engineering principles, and the conditions of any variances obtained from the City.
3.8.2 Indemnification Statement
Construction Drawings are reviewed by the City of Moab for concept only. The review does not
imply responsibility by the City of Moab for accuracy and correctness of calculations.
Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final
quantities required. The review shall not be construed for any reason as acceptance of financial
Page 92 of 171
responsibility by the City for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during
the construction phase.
3.8.3 Construction Drawing Requirements
In general, construction drawings shall include plan and profile drawings that convey the
horizontal and vertical alignment of the improvements, and all other pertinent plans, sections and
detailing necessary to construct the proposed facilities.
All construction drawings submitted to the City for review, comment, and approval of
wastewater system improvements shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of a
Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Utah. Said Professional Engineer shall be
responsible for the information contained on the construction drawings, which shall bear the
Professional Engineer’s seal prior to final approval for construction.
The Developer, Contractor and Engineer associated with the construction drawings shall be
responsible for the adequacy and satisfactory performance of the designs and the installation of
all items therein, and any failure or unsatisfactory performance of the system, so constructed,
shall not be a cause for action against the City. Approval of the construction drawings by the
City signifies only that the construction drawings meet the minimum stipulations of these design
criteria and City requirements based upon the information provided to the City by the Engineer
and/or Developer, and makes no finding, representation, or warranty that the system and
associated components will perform satisfactorily.
3.8.3.1 Wastewater Utility Construction Drawings
In addition to the general formatting and information to be included on all sheets of a
construction drawing (e.g., north arrow, scale, project boundaries, lot lines, rights-of-way, tracts,
approval blocks, etc.), the following information shall be included on the final Wastewater
Utility Plans.
1. Legend: Each sheet shall show the symbols pertaining to the sheet.
2. Vertical Datum: All elevations used for the planning, design and construction of
facilities shall be on the NAVD88 Datum. No conversion equation is allowed.
3. Horizontal Benchmark and Coordinates: The horizontal benchmark shall be specified.
In order to facilitate the City’s GIS mapping efforts, all construction drawings shall be
placed in the State Plane NAD83, Utah Central Zone Coordinate System and include the
coordinates of a known property corner on or adjacent to the site.
4. Plan views shall be oriented so that north is up on the sheet or to the right.
5. Overall Wastewater System Plan: In plan view, provide all information and dimensions
for horizontal layout of proposed sanitary sewer and force mains including but not
limited to manholes, wye connections, sanitary sewer service lines, cleanouts, lift
stations, and any other appurtenances that are part of the wastewater collection system.
Page 93 of 171
Coordinates shall be provided for the locations of manholes, lift stations and other key
components.
6. Plan views shall show the locations and sizes of all existing and proposed utility lines
and appurtenances (water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, gas, electric, telephone, cable,
fiber optic, etc.) on and adjacent to the site. Plan views shall show the location of all
existing water wells and On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) on and
adjacent to the site.
7. Plan views shall show existing sanitary sewer and force mains with sizes; manholes;
sanitary sewer service taps and lines; clean-outs; lift stations; and any other
appurtenances that are part of the wastewater collection system on and adjacent to the
site.
8. Plan views shall show existing and proposed curb, gutter, and sidewalks; and all
existing and proposed obstructions, such as vaults, catch basins, traffic islands, street
lights, walls or other permanent structures on and adjacent to the site.
9. Plan views and profiles shall show the tie-ins to the existing wastewater collection
system, including sizes of existing sewers. In addition, the nearest manholes on existing
sewers shall be shown or, at a minimum, the distance to these manholes shall be included
on the CDs.
10. Plan views and profiles shall show all needed off-site improvements, extensions of
service or upgrades to the City’s wastewater collection system.
11. Plan views shall show and label as to type and width, all existing and proposed
easements that are on and adjacent to the site. Recordation information shall be included
for all existing easements.
12. Profile views are required for all sanitary sewers and force mains and must show
proposed streets profiles and existing ground surface profiles. The following information
shall be included:
a. All high points (HP) and low points (LP) along the sanitary sewer and force
mains shall be identified;
b. Where required by these Criteria, combination air release and air/vacuum
valves and drain valves shall be shown on force mains, with the TOP elevations
provided.
c. All utility crossings shall be identified.
13. Profile views or plan views: Adequate pipe elevation information is required for all
utility crossings of water, sanitary sewer, force main, stormwater, gas, electric lines, etc.
The following information shall be included:
a. Types and sizes of the utility lines at the crossing and the location of the
crossing.
b. If any pipes at a crossing are to be encased, the coordinates at each end of the
encasement, and the type and thickness of the encasements shall be specified. In
addition, all utility crossing shall include either:
Page 94 of 171
(1) A reference to the sheet where the crossing information is shown; or
(2) TOP and BOP elevations and vertical clearance at the crossing with a
callout of “(Min. = 1.5’)” wherever the clearance is 2 feet or less.
14. Wastewater System Details: All pertinent details related to wastewater system
improvements, such as manholes, outside drop manholes, sanitary sewer service line
connections, sanitary sewer clean-outs, proposed utility crossings, including concrete
blankets, trenching, etc., shall be shown on detail sheets on the construction drawings.
References to the Utah APWA plans may be provided. In this case, the detail drawings
don’t need to be provided in the plan set.
3.9 Record Drawings
All wastewater system improvements constructed within public rights-of-way and dedicated
easements must be formally accepted by the City.
Page 95 of 171
4.1 Design Criteria - Reference Design Documents
Standards and reference publications pertinent to the design of wastewater facilities within the
City are listed below. Unless otherwise specified, the latest editions shall apply.
• Utah State Code, Annotated
• Utah Administrative Code
• Utah American Public Works Association (Utah APWA)
• All applicable International Codes recognized by the City including, but not limited to,
the International Building Code (IBC), the International Plumbing Code (IPC), the
International Fire Code (IFC), the International Residential Code (IRC), and the
International Mechanical Code (IMC)
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
• Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ)
• City of Moab Municipal Code
• City of Moab Wastewater Master Plan
• Gravity Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction (Current Version). Manuals and
Reports on Engineering Practice No. 60. American Society of Civil Engineers/Water
Pollution Control Federation.
4.2 Prohibited Installations
The following installations are prohibited unless otherwise approved by the City. Items listed
below reference sections contained in these Criteria that provide the minimum design
requirements to be addressed should a variance be pursued.
• On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS)
• Private Ejector Pumps and Private Lift stations, unless approved by the City
• Inverted Wastewater Siphons
• Manholes and sewer lines over 20 feet deep
• Elevated Wastewater Pipelines
4.3 Unlawful Connections
It shall be unlawful to discharge roof drainage, foundation drainage, sump pumps, surface
drainage, storm water, solid wastes, or any other illicit discharges to the wastewater collection
system..
Page 96 of 171
4.4 Minimum Wastewater System Design Criteria
This section presents the minimum technical criteria for the analysis and design of wastewater
systems within the boundaries of the City of Moab and other areas served by the City, including
collection sewers, sanitary sewer service lines, and the applicable appurtenances associated with
these installations. Any special criteria beyond those contained herein, and as determined
necessary by the City, shall be discussed at the pre-application consultation (or as the issue
arises).
4.4.1 Design Flows
Average daily loadings, peaking factors and average annual loadings shall be based on the
criteria included in the current Utah Administrative Code and based upon information included
in the Wastewater Master Plan. This information is currently located at {R317-3 U.A.C.}. The
City may adjust the loading values based on the evaluation of actual use data, a current master
plan or other conditions determined to affect the safety and welfare of the public.
4.4.2 Hydraulic Design
Wastewater systems shall be designed to provide a minimum velocity of 2.0 feet per second at
the peak design flow. In situations where the minimum velocity of 2.0 feet per second cannot be
met, an explanation and justification shall be included in the Final Wastewater Utility Report.
The maximum velocity shall not exceed 10 feet per second.
Drop manholes shall be provided to break steep slopes to limit the velocities in conformance
with this criterion. Where drop manholes are impractical for velocity reduction, the sewer must
be approved by variance and shall be of PVC or other abrasion resistant material approved by the
City.
Where actual flow will be much below normal for several years, the minimum velocity shall be
achieved by suitable grades at the initial design flow rate. Care shall be taken to design invert
elevations at manholes in such a manner that the energy gradient is consistently falling in the
direction of the flow.
Sanitary sewers shall be sized to convey the peak design flow in accordance with the following
table:
Pipe Diameter
(inches)
Maximum Depth of Flow/Pipe
Diameter
≤ 15 0.5
>15 0.75
Computation of velocity of flow shall be based on a coefficient of roughness "n" in the Manning
formula as follows: n = 0.013 (min).
Page 97 of 171
At all junctions where a smaller diameter main discharges in to a larger one, the crowns (obverts)
of the two pipes shall have matching elevations. No surcharging of sanitary sewer lines is
allowed.
4.4.3 Pipe Sizes and Grades
Sanitary sewer shall be a minimum of 8 inches in diameter. Service lines shall be a minimum of
4 inches in diameter.
The minimum sewer slopes shall comply with the slopes included in Table R317-3-2.3(D)(4) of
the Utah Administrative Code.
4.4.4 Selection of Pipe Material
Gravity sewers in the City collection system shall be constructed of PVC, or fiber-glass
reinforced polymer mortar, unless special conditions require another material. Force mains shall
be PVC or HDPE. Other pipe materials must be approved by the City prior to use. If concrete is
to be used, the collection system must be evaluated for sulfide corrosion risk and corrosion
mitigation measures must be implemented as needed. Sewers at stream crossings or crossings
with water lines shall be ductile iron in accordance with {R317 U.A.C.}. Materials for building
sewers (between structures and the City collection main) shall be in accordance with plumbing
code.
4.4.5 General Wastewater System Layout Criteria
4.4.5.1 Location
All sanitary sewers and appurtenances shall be installed in dedicated rights-of-way or dedicated
utility easements. Sewers or manholes shall not be installed parallel to, and directly below, any
concrete such as sidewalks, trails, curbs, or gutters. In general, sanitar y sewers shall be located in
public streets near the center of the south or west lane. Sanitary sewers and manholes shall not
be located in vehicle wheel paths. A sewer shall not be closer than 5 feet to a gutter. Sanitary
sewer lines and manholes shall not be located within detention pond areas.
Where it is necessary to locate a sanitary sewer main along back lot lines, the alignment shall be
specifically approved by the City. Manholes installed along lot lines shall be provided locking-
type covers.
4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout
Sewers shall be laid with a minimum separation of 10 feet horizontally, edge-to-edge, from all
water lines. Sewers shall have a minimum separation of 10 feet horizontally, centerline-to-
centerline, from all other existing or proposed utilities wherever possible. The City of Moab
must specifically approve any variance from these requirements in the event that it has been
determined that it is impossible to maintain the specified horizontal separation distances.
Page 98 of 171
Sewers adjacent to developments shall be designed to extend along the entire frontage of the
property to be served, from property line to property line, with termination in a manhole. This
provides for wastewater service for adjacent Developers or Builders in the future. Within
developments, sanitary sewers shall be extended at least ten feet horizontally uphill from the
lowest lot corner of the uppermost lot, and shall terminate in a manhole.
4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout
Sanitary sewers shall have a minimum cover of 5 feet to finished ground surface, and a
maximum cover of 20 feet unless otherwise approved by variance. Sanitary sewers shall be deep
enough to collect wastewater from all basements by gravity flow. When less than 9 feet of
elevation difference exists between the finished lot grade at the building line and the top of the
sanitary sewer main, such conditions shall be clearly addressed in the required Utility Reports,
with notes provided on the record drawings indicating which lots are served by a "shallow
sanitary sewer." Appropriate elevation information shall be provided on the record drawings for
all such mains. For sewers that receive or will receive flow from offsite, the minimum depth to
the sewer is 9 feet, unless otherwise approved by the City.
4.4.5.4 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing a Water Main
When it is necessary for sewers to cross public water system pipes, the crossings shall be in
accordance with the State of Utah requirements. These requirements are located at {R309-550-7
U.A.C.} and {R317-3-2.9(B)(1) U.A.C}.
4.4.5.5 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing of a Storm Drain
When sanitary sewers or force mains cross a storm drain, regardless of vertical clearance and
which pipe crosses over the other, each joint of the storm sewer within the trench width of the
crossing shall be encased in a concrete collar at least 6 inches thick and extending at least 6
inches each side of each joint.
4.4.5.6 Limits on Minimum Vertical Clearance
Under no circumstances shall the minimum vertical clearance between any two crossing utilities
be less than 12 inches unless approved by the City.
4.4.6 Bored Crossings
When a sewer passes under a State roadway, an arterial or collector roadway as defined by the
City, railroad, drainage or irrigation ditch, the sewer shall be located within bored steel casing
pipe, unless otherwise allowed to be open cut by the jurisdictional entity being crossed. The
carrier pipe shall be supported by casing spacers. The casing shall be sealed around the sewer at
the casing ends. The casing shall have a minimum of 5 feet of cover. The casing pipe shall
extend the entire width of the right-of-way or easement of the crossing structure, or as directed
by the City or other jurisdictional entity.
Page 99 of 171
Crossing at ditches shall include cutoff walls at each side of the crossing, either as required by
the jurisdictional entity, or as analyzed and designed by the Engineer at the direction of the
Engineering Department.
Casing pipe shall be smooth-walled, non-coated pipe of welded steel construction conforming to
ANSI/AWWA C200, and shall be seamless or straight seam steel pipe with minimum yield
strength of 35,000 psi. The casing pipe shall be new material and have a minimum wall thickness
as follows unless specified otherwise.
Carrier Pipe Nominal
Diameter
Min. Casing
Pipe O.D. Min. Wall Thickness*
4” 12” 0.250”
6” 14” 0.3125”
8” 16” 0.3125”
12” 20” 0.3750”
*The boring contractor shall determine and provide a greater wall thickness if
needed. Other pipe sizes shall be designed by a professional engineer and
submitted to the City of Moab for review.
The Engineer shall evaluate the risk of corrosion to the casing based on the corrosively of the
surrounding soils, as well as any known risks from nearby stray current, buried electrical lines,
nearby impressed current corrosion protection systems or other factors. For each casing
installed, the Engineer shall provide a written evaluation as to whether corrosion protection is
needed. If needed, the Engineer shall provide a design for corrosion protection. The City
preference is for sacrificial anodes systems rather than impressed current systems. The design
shall be submitted to the City for review. Long-term maintenance of the system, including anode
assessment and replacement, shall be addressed in the evaluation.
4.4.7 Manholes
4.4.7.1 Layout
1. Location: Manholes for access to sewers shall be provided at the following locations:
a. All junctions of sanitary sewers.
b. All points of change in alignment, grade or pipe size.
c. All points of industrial and commercial discharge to facilitate observation and
sampling.
d. The upstream terminus of the main.
e. Cleanouts shall not be allowed to replace manholes on sanitary sewer lines 8
inch and larger.
2. Alignment and Spacing: Sewer manholes shall be aligned and spaced as follows:
Page 100 of 171
a. Sewers shall be installed in a straight alignment, both in line and grade, and not
curved between manholes.
b. Maximum spacing between manholes shall be 400 feet for lines 15 inches or
smaller and 500 feet for lines 18 inches and larger.
c. Maximum change in alignment shall not exceed 90 degrees.
d. Manhole lids shall not be aligned with vehicle wheel paths, or within 2 feet
either direction of the street crown.
e. No drop-in style riser or paver rings are allowed. Grade rings beneath the ring
and cover are allowable for final grade adjustment with a maximum of 12 inches.
3. Access: Provisions for manhole access shall be as follows:
a. Manholes shall not be located in areas that are subject to flooding from surface
runoff. If the possibility of surface runoff flooding cannot be avoided, a watertight
lid as approved by the City shall be installed to prevent inflow.
b. Manholes shall be located in areas that allow direct access by maintenance
vehicles when it is not feasible to locate the manhole in a public street.
c. Manholes shall not be located in open space access roads, wherever possible. If
it is impossible to locate a manhole outside an access road, then the cover shall be
at the grade of the access road and a 10’ x 10’ concrete collar shall be installed
around the manhole. All manholes located outside dedicated street right-of-way
shall be designed and constructed with a locking-type cover and the manhole ring
shall be bolted to the manhole cone and the manhole lid shall be raised in
accordance with the City’s Standard Detail. Marker shall be installed to mark the
location of manholes outside of pavement.
d. All manhole lids shall be depressed ¼” to ½” below any adjacent finished street
surface.
4.4.7.2 Manhole Sizing
Manholes for sanitary sewers up to 18 inches in diameter shall have an inside diameter not less
than 4-feet. Manholes for sanitary sewers 18 inches to 36 inches shall have an inside diameter of
not less than 5-feet. Manholes for sanitary sewers 36 inches to 54 inches shall have an inside
diameter of 6 feet. Manholes for sanitary sewers over 54 inches shall be of special design. If the
angle of deflection does not permit use of a 6 foot inside diameter manhole, then a special
manhole detail must be submitted for review and approval by the City. There shall be a bench
located below the bottom manhole ladder rung.
4.4.7.3 Drop Manholes
1. Drop manholes shall be in accordance with the City’s standard details.
Page 101 of 171
4.4.7.4 Main Connections to Existing Manholes
No new connection shall be made with existing manholes. When connections are required at the
location of an existing manhole, the manhole shall be replaced unless otherwise approved by the
City.
4.4.7.5 Sanitary Sewers and Manholes Greater than 20 Feet
Where sanitary sewers or manholes cannot be designed at depths less than 20 feet, a variance
shall be obtained.
4.4.8 Inverted Wastewater Siphons
The design of inverted wastewater siphons, or sag pipes, shall be avoided, unless approved by
the City. When inverted siphon construction is deemed necessary and approved by the City, the
facility shall have at least two separate barrels with a minimum pipe size of 8 inches, and shall
include appurtenances for convenient flushing and maintenance. Inlet and outlet structures shall
have adequate clearance for access and maintenance operations, and sufficient head shall be
provided and pipes sized to ensure velocities of at least 3.0 feet per second under average flow
for both initial and future build-out conditions. The inlet and outlet shall be arranged so that
normal flows can be diverted to one barrel, and that either barrel may be removed from service
for cleaning or repair.
4.4.9 Fill Areas
Where sanitary sewer lines will be constructed in fill areas, all fill materials shall be placed and
compacted to final grade prior to the installation of the sanitary sewer line and appurtenances.
4.4.10 Future Connections
Manholes shall have pipes stubbed out that are sized to accommodate flows from the upstream
basin whenever a future extension of the sanitary sewer main is anticipated. The main line stub-
out shall be capped and sealed.
4.4.11 Sanitary Sewer Service Lines
All single family residential dwellings, each individual unit in multi-family complexes, and each
commercial business and industrial customer shall be served by a separate, independent sanitary
sewer service line. The City Engineer may approve the use of a single service line for multi-
family residences.
4.4.12.1 Ownership
After a building is connected through a service line to the sanitary sewer, the service shall
become a part of the building, and the Owner of the premises shall be responsible for the
operation and maintenance of the entire service line (building sewer) between the building and
the City sewer, excluding the wye at the connection. Although the service line up to the wye is
the responsibility of the Owner, the service lines and associated connections to the main shall be
inspected and tested by the City prior to backfill. The inspection of service line stub-outs will
Page 102 of 171
take place at the same time inspections are conducted for the installation of the sanitary sewer
main. Inspection of the entire service line will be made when the service line is extended to the
building.
4.4.12.2 Layout
The Owner shall install a service line stub-out from the sanitary sewer main to each individual
lot. Where sidewalks are proposed to be constructed, the stub-out shall be constructed to 15 feet
beyond the back of the sidewalk. Where sidewalks will not be constructed, the stub-out shall be
constructed a minimum of one foot beyond the property line. The stub-outs shall be plugged and
the end marked with a green painted T-post installed in the ground directly above the location of
the plugged end.
4.4.12.3 Cleanouts
Cleanouts shall be required on wastewater service lines in accordance with the City standard
details and in accordance with plumbing code.
4.4.12.4 Structural Requirements
A. Under Roads - All structures and pipe placed under public roads shall be of sufficient
strength to support, with an adequate factor of safety, the backfill, road surfacing and H-
20 traffic load per AASHTO Standard Specifications.
B. Steep Grades - Concrete anchors shall be provided for sewers on slopes of 20% or
greater, or where wastewater velocities exceed 15 feet/second. The purpose of the
anchors is to secure the sewer against lateral or axial displacement.
4.5 Easements
Where sewers cannot be installed in right-of-way, they shall be located within utility easements
approved by the City and shall be centered in the easement. All utility easements shall have a
minimum width of at least two times the depth to the pipe invert. The minimum easement width
shall be 20 feet for one utility, 30 feet for two utilities, and 40 feet in width for three utilities.
Site-specific circumstances may dictate the need for wider easements. Utility easements and
dedicated utility tracts shall be defined by bearings and distances around the perimeter of the
easement. Centerline legal descriptions are not acceptable.
All utility easements shall be for the exclusive use of the City. No permanent structures, (e.g.,
retaining walls, trees, light pedestals, sign foundations, power poles, mailboxes, sheds, buildings,
etc.), shall be placed in the easement.
Page 103 of 171
4.6 Sand/Oil and Grease Interceptors
Sand/oil and grease interceptors shall be installed on service lines from commercial and
industrial properties discharging oil and grease. The owner shall prepare sizing calculations for
the interceptor for City review. At the City’s option, the City will size the interceptor. The
interceptors shall include a sampling port which extends into a manhole or other City approved
structure which causes the discharged fluid to drop vertically at least 3-inches so that a samples
may be collected. The connection must be in a location accessible by City inspectors so that
samples can be collected.
Page 104 of 171
5.1 Sewage Pump Stations (Lift Stations) and Force Mains
5.1.1 Scope
New lift stations are discouraged and shall only be allowed in those locations where there is no
feasible way the development can be served by gravity extension of the City’s existing
wastewater collection system.
5.1.2 Compliance with State of Utah Standards
Lift stations shall be designed in accordance with the State of Utah standards, currently located at
{R317-3-3 U.A.C}. Lift stations shall also be design in accordance within the applicable
building codes.
5.1.3 City Review and Approval
New lift stations must be approved by the City. If approved, the Developer shall submit a utility
report with a complete set of design calculations and drawings for review and acceptance by the
City.
5.1.4 Flood Protection
Lift station structures and the associated electrical and mechanical equipment shall be protected
from damage by the 100-year flood, and shall remain fully operational and accessible during
such an event. Local, State and Federal regulations pertaining to floodplain shall be satisfactorily
accounted for in the design. Grading shall be provided to protect the site by directing surface
flows away from the facilities.
5.1.5 Accessibility and Security
Lift stations shall be readily accessible by maintenance vehicles during all weather conditions.
The facility should be located off the traffic way of streets and alleys. Depending on the nature
and location of the facility, security fencing with controlled entry keypads, card-reader access to
buildings, security cameras, lockable access hatches, and motion-detection safety lighting may
be required.
5.1.6 Grit
Where it is necessary to pump wastewater prior to grit removal, the design of the wet well and
lift station piping shall receive special consideration to avoid operational problems from the
accumulation of grit.
5.1.7 Station Ventilation
Adequate ventilation at lift stations shall be provided to mechanically ventilate the dry well, and
if screens or mechanical equipment requiring maintenance or inspection are located in the wet
well, it shall also be mechanically ventilated. There shall be no inter-connection between the wet
well and dry well ventilating systems. In pits over 15 feet deep, multiple inlets and outlets are
Page 105 of 171
required. Switches for the operation of ventilation equipment should be clearly marked and
conveniently located. Consideration should be given to automatic controls where operations may
be intermittent.
Where excessive moisture or low temperatures are a concern, consideration shall be given to
installation of heating and/or dehumidification equipment.
5.1.8 Odor Control
Unacceptable levels of odors may be produced at lift stations and within force mains due to
excessive hydrogen sulfide generation. Odor control systems are required.
5.2 Minimum Lift Station Design Criteria
The following design criteria shall be applicable to lift stations:
1. Lift stations must be equipped with instrumentation and SCADA equipment to collect
and transmit all relevant data.
2. Backup electrical power provided by a diesel or natural gas generator with an
automatic transfer switch in an all-weather enclosure shall be provided to insure that all
lift station components function properly for a period of at least one week in the event
that the primary power is lost. Electrical power to the lift station site shall be
underground. In addition, an emergency overflow basin shall be provided that will
accommodate a minimum 12 hours of storage at the peak daily loading rates. The basin
shall be designed and configured to allow for complete draining after an overflow event,
either by gravity or submersible sump pumps permanently installed in the basin.
3. Lift stations shall include a wet well sized to reduce the cycling of the pumps and the
settling of solids from the flows.
4. A corrosion protection system shall be applied to, and shall completely cover all
interior surfaces of wet wells, and any in-line vaults or manholes that precede the wet
well. The system shall be specifically designed to protect concrete from hydrogen sulfide
corrosion.
5. All lift station wet wells shall be considered an explosion hazard. All electrical
equipment and wiring installed therein shall be designed for this hazard.
6. Installation of suitable devices for measuring, recording and totalizing sewage influent
and effluent flow and power consumption shall be included.
Page 106 of 171
7. The lift station design shall consider changes in flows over the life of the station and
allow for proper operation of the station and force main throughout the intended design
life.
8. Where high groundwater conditions are possible, buoyancy of the lift station structures
shall be evaluated and protected against flotation.
9. The lift station shall include a wet well bypass-to-overflow basin to allow the wet well
to be temporarily removed from service for maintenance.
5.3 Pump Equipment and Protection
Pumping equipment shall be specifically designed and rated for wastewater service. For
wastewater lift stations with an ultimate rated capacity of 1 MGD or less, the City will consider
the use of either self-priming pumps in a wet well, or self-priming pumps in a wet well / dry well
configuration. For stations with an ultimate capacity in excess of 1 MGD, only a wet well self-
priming configuration with the pump located above the wet well and above ground will be
accepted.
5.3.1 Pump Characteristics
1. Pumps shall be specifically designed and rated for wastewater service.
2. The design Engineer shall consider pump efficiency in the design with the intent to
maximize pumping efficiency and minimize electrical power demand.
3. Wastewater level measurement equipment shall be provided and shall be connected
with the City SCADA system.
3. The lift station shall be provided with multiple pump units programmed to alternate
sequentially. Should only two units be provided, equal capacity is required, and each
pump train shall be capable of handling the peak flow. Pump redundancy is required so
that pumps may be taken out of service for maintenance.
4. The station shall be designed such that the number of motor starts per hour shall not
exceed 10, or the number of starts recommended by the motor manufacturer, whichever
is less. Duplex pump operation and controllers shall be provided such that the lead and
lag pump positions are alternated with each successive motor start.
5. Provisions acceptable to the City shall be made to facilitate the removal of pumps,
motors, and other mechanical and electrical equipment. Typically, in wet well / dry well
stations, a bridge crane shall be provided for removing pumps. In suction lift stations,
slide or overhead rails with hoists for removing pumps shall be provided. In wet well
stations, rails shall be provided.
Page 107 of 171
5.3.2 Pump Protection
Pumps handling raw wastewater shall be preceded by approved grinders that are installed to
protect the pumps from clogging damage by reducing the particle size of wastewater solids in the
flow stream. The grinder shall be located in a lined vault or manhole that precedes the wet well.
Grinder pumps may be used in wet well settings for flows less than 1 MGD.
5.4 Overflow Basins
Overflow basins for lift stations shall be sized to contain the volume of 12 hours the Average
Daily Flow at build-out. The basin shall be designed and configured to allow for complete
draining after an overflow event, either by gravity or submersible sump pumps permanently
installed in the basin. Basins shall be designed to include a vault or manhole outside the overflow
basin to facilitate the complete removal of any liquid that accumulates in the basin, and shall
require the installation of a pipe between the basin and vault, with positive slope to the vault. A
pump-back or gravity system shall be included in the lift station design to return wastewater to
the wet well.
5.5 Force Main Design Criteria
5.5.1 Pipe Materials
Force main pipe materials, including restraint devices and fittings, shall be PVC or HDPE. Use
of other materials must be approved by the City.
5.5.2 Velocity and Pipe Diameter
Sanitary sewer force mains shall be a minimum of 3 inches in diameter. At the design pumping
rate (initial and ultimate), the velocity shall be at least 3 feet/second, but not more than 7
feet/second.
5.5.3 Pipe and Design Pressure
The force main, joint restraint, thrust blocking, and station piping shall be analyzed and designed
to withstand water hammer pressures and associated cyclic reversal stresses that are expected
with the cycling of wastewater lift station pumps. Water hammer shall be evaluated for the
normal operation of the lift station, as well as for a power outage while the pumps are running.
5.5.4 Shutoff and Check Valves
Suitable shutoff and check valves shall be placed on the discharge line of each pump. Check
valves shall be suitable for the material being handled and shall be placed on the horizontal
portion of discharge piping except for ball checks, which may be placed in the vertical run.
Valves shall be capable of withstanding operational design pressures and water hammer.
Page 108 of 171
5.5.5 Isolation Valves
Isolation valves shall be installed at intervals no greater than 1,000 feet along force mains.
5.5.6 Combination Air Release and Air/Vacuum Valves
Combination air release and air/vacuum valves shall be located at force main high points, on
pump discharge piping as close as possible to the check valve, and between isolation valves.
During the design, the Engineer shall consider the economics of air valve installation against the
installation of deeper force main piping. The evaluation shall take into account the installation
and long-term maintenance costs of the air valves. The valves shall be specifically designed for
wastewater service and be sized per the manufacturer’s recommendations. Air valves on force
mains shall be contained in a vault and vented above ground. A manually controlled isolation
valve suitable for wastewater service shall be installed between the force main and air valve.
5.5.7 Drain Valves
When required by the City, the Engineer shall include at least one force main dewatering
connection at the lift station and additional drains at other major force main low points. The
design shall consist of as few low points along the force main as is practically possible. Drains
shall generally include a plug valve installed on a tee and drain piping to an existing sanitary
sewer manhole, or to a separate manhole that can then be pumped by City personnel. Provisions
shall be made to drain the force main back to the wet well.
5.5.8 Cleanouts
Cleanouts shall be provided in the force main at distances not to exceed 500 feet.
5.5.9 Termination
Force mains shall transition into the gravity wastewater system at a dedicated manhole. The
connection of the force main to the manhole shall be made by connecting the force main to a
short section of gravity main stubbed out from the manhole. The gravity stub shall be a size that
is equal to or larger diameter pipe than the force main, and shall be installed at an elevation that
will prevent wastewater from discharging back into the force main when the gravity system is
flowing full. The manhole interior shall be coated for protection against hydrogen sulfide
corrosion. The manhole and its opening shall be oversized to permit retrieval of cleaning pigs
and ancillary equipment. The manhole at the discharge point shall not be an in-line gravity
manhole.
5.5.10 Identification
Minimum identification requirements for force mains shall consist of tracer wire and warning
tape as required for potable water mains, and green marked polywrap for ductile iron pipe. The
warning tape shall be labeled, “Caution: Buried Force Main Below”.
Page 109 of 171
WATER SYSTEM DESIGN
CRITERIA MANUAL
Effective Date: August 1, 2017
Page 110 of 171
Contents
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Jurisdiction .............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.4 Amendments and Revisions .................................................................................................................... 1
1.5 Enforcement Responsibility .................................................................................................................... 2
1.6 Review and Acceptance .......................................................................................................................... 2
1.7 Interpretation.......................................................................................................................................... 2
1.8 Relationship to Other Standards ............................................................................................................. 3
1.8.1 State Public Water System Code and Rules .............................................................................. 3
1.8.2 State Construction Code ........................................................................................................... 3
1.8.3 NSF International Standards ..................................................................................................... 3
1.9 Variances from these Criteria ................................................................................................................. 3
1.10 Adoption of the Utah American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications
...................................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.11 Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................. 3
1.12 Definitions of Terms .............................................................................................................................. 4
2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 7
2.2 Planning Policy ........................................................................................................................................ 7
2.3 Design Policy ........................................................................................................................................... 7
2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy .......................................................................................... 7
2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy ............................................................................................. 8
2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy ....................................................................................................... 8
2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy ........................................................................................ 8
2.8 Duty of the Professional Engineer Preparing Development Documents ................................................ 9
3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 10
3.2 Review Process ...................................................................................................................................... 10
3.2.1 Pre-Application Consultation ......................................................................................................... 10
3.2.2 Water Utility Report Requirements ............................................................................................... 10
3.2.2.1 Format ..................................................................................................................................... 10
3.2.2.2 Stand-Alone Document ........................................................................................................... 10
Page 111 of 171
3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy ................................................................................................................ 11
3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies .......................................................................................................... 11
3.3 Acceptance ............................................................................................................................................ 11
3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction .............................................................................. 11
3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report ................................................................................... 11
3.4 Preliminary Water Utility Report .......................................................................................................... 11
3.4.1 Water System Modeling ................................................................................................................ 14
3.5. Engineering Department Responsibility .............................................................................................. 14
3.6 Final Water Utility Report ..................................................................................................................... 14
3.6.1 Disclaimer ....................................................................................................................................... 17
3.7 Construction Drawings .......................................................................................................................... 18
3.7.1 Water System Improvements ........................................................................................................ 18
3.7.2 Indemnification Statement ............................................................................................................ 18
3.7.3 Construction Drawing Requirements ............................................................................................. 18
3.7.3.1 Water Utility Construction Drawings ...................................................................................... 18
3.8 Record Drawings ................................................................................................................................... 20
4.1 Reference Design Documents ............................................................................................................... 21
4.2 Prohibited Installations ......................................................................................................................... 21
4.3 Unlawful Connections ........................................................................................................................... 21
4.4 Minimum Water System Design Criteria .............................................................................................. 22
4.4.1. Design Demands ........................................................................................................................... 22
4.4.1.1 Fire Flows ................................................................................................................................ 22
4.4.2 Storage Requirements ................................................................................................................... 22
4.4.3 Minimum Hydraulic Performance Criteria ..................................................................................... 22
4.4.3.1 Operating Pressures and Pressure Zone Characteristics ........................................................ 23
4.4.3.2 Location of Pressure Reducing Valves .................................................................................... 23
4.4.4 Minimum Distribution Main Sizing and Valve Spacing .................................................................. 23
4.4.5 General Water System Layout Criteria .......................................................................................... 23
4.4.5.1 Location ................................................................................................................................... 23
4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout .................................................................................................................... 23
4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout ........................................................................................................................ 24
4.4.6 Pipe Joint Deflection ...................................................................................................................... 24
Page 112 of 171
4.4.7 Distribution Main Looping ............................................................................................................. 24
4.4.8 Transmission Mains ....................................................................................................................... 25
4.4.9 Bored Crossings .............................................................................................................................. 25
4.4.10 Appurtenances ............................................................................................................................. 26
4.4.10.1 Valves .................................................................................................................................... 26
4.4.10.2 Pressure Reducing Valves ..................................................................................................... 27
4.4.10.3 Fire Hydrants ......................................................................................................................... 27
4.4.10.4 Thrust Restraint .................................................................................................................... 28
4.4.10.5 Meters and Service Connections .......................................................................................... 28
4.4.10.6 Fire Protection Service Lines ................................................................................................. 29
4.4.10.7 Manholes .............................................................................................................................. 29
4.4.10.8 Backflow Prevention Assemblies .......................................................................................... 29
4.4.10.9 Combination Air Release and Vacuum Valves ...................................................................... 30
4.4.10.10 Blow-off Pumping Manholes .............................................................................................. 30
4.4.10.11 Tracer Wire and Warning Tape ........................................................................................... 30
4.4.11 Fill Areas ....................................................................................................................................... 30
4.4.12 Trail Access ................................................................................................................................... 30
4.4.13 Main-Break Swale Design ............................................................................................................ 31
4.4.14 Future Connections ...................................................................................................................... 31
4.4.15 Water Service Lines ...................................................................................................................... 31
4.4.15.1 Layout.................................................................................................................................... 31
4.5 Easements ............................................................................................................................................. 32
4.6 Testing and Disinfection ........................................................................................................................ 32
5.1 General .................................................................................................................................................. 33
5.1.1 Scope .............................................................................................................................................. 33
Page 113 of 171
1.1 Introduction
These criteria and design standards together with all future amendments shall be known as the
City of Moab Water System Design Criteria Manual (hereafter called “Criteria”). All utility
reports and plans, analyses, and designs, submitted as a requirement of the City of Moab
(hereafter called “City”) ordinances and resolutions (hereafter called “Regulations”), shall
comply with these Criteria.
1.2 Jurisdiction
These Criteria shall apply to all land within the incorporated area of the City of Moab, or served
by the City, including any public lands. These Criteria shall apply to all systems and facilities
constructed in or on City Rights-of-Way, easements dedicated for utilities across public or
private property, easements for public use, and to all privately owned and maintained system
facilities.
1.3 Purpose
Presented in these Criteria are the policies and minimum technical criteria for the planning,
design and construction of drinking water systems within the boundaries of the City of Moab and
areas served by the City. All subdivisions, site plans, or any other proposed development
submitted for acceptance by the City shall include adequate and appropriate water system
planning, analysis, and design. Such planning, analysis, and design shall conform to or exceed
the Criteria set forth herein. Water system planning, analysis, and design that require policies and
technical expertise not specifically addressed in these Criteria shall follow the requirements
outlined in the Utah Code Annotated, Utah Administrative Code (see {R309 U.A.C.}), industry
standards and manufacturer’s recommendations. In the event of a conflict, the State of Utah
Codes and Administrative Rules will prevail. Interpretation will be provided by the City of
Moab and/or the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Drinking Water.
1.4 Amendments and Revisions
Policies and criteria may be amended as new technology is developed or if experience gained in
the use of these Criteria indicates a need for revision. All technical criteria and policy changes
must be recommended by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Minor revisions will
require the approval of the City. All major revisions will require adoption, by resolution or
ordinance of the City Council. The City Engineer may approve minor revisions and technical
changes.
Page 114 of 171
TABLE 1-1 EXAMPLES OF MINOR AND MAJOR REVISIONS
MINOR MAJOR
Grammar Policy Changes
Submittal Requirements
Clarifications
Construction Detail Revisions for
clarification, minor modification
Technical Criteria Changes
1.5 Enforcement Responsibility
The Engineering Department and Public Works Department shall review all water system reports,
plans, analyses, and designs submitted as a requirement of the Regulations for compliance with
these Criteria. The Regulations are enforced by the City of Moab and authorized representatives.
1.6 Review and Acceptance
The City shall review all submittals for general compliance with these Criteria. An acceptance
by the City does not relieve the Owner, Engineer, or Designer from the responsibility of
ensuring that the design, calculations, plans, specifications, construction, and record drawings are
in compliance with these Criteria and in compliance with other applicable State and Federal
requirements. The City may refer submittals to other agencies that have an interest or
responsibility for water system issues.
1.7 Interpretation
In the interpretation and application of these Criteria by the City, the provisions herein shall be
regarded as the minimum requirements for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare
of the residents of the City of Moab.
Whenever a provision of these Criteria and any other provision of the Regulations or any
provision in any law, ordinance, resolution, rule or regulation of any kind, contains any
requirement(s) covering any of the same subject matter, the requirements that are more
restrictive or impose higher standards shall govern, as determined by the City.
These Criteria shall not abrogate or annul any binding agreements, Development Improvement
Agreements, easements, permits, utility reports or construction drawings accepted by the City
prior to the effective date of these Criteria.
Page 115 of 171
1.8 Relationship to Other Standards
1.8.1 State Public Water System Code and Rules
Public water systems in the State of Utah are governed by the State of Utah Code Annotated and
the Utah Administrative Code. These codes and rules apply to policy, planning, criteria and
construction of public water system and prevail if a conflict exists with the Criteria. Most water
projects require a submittal to the Utah Divison of Drinking Water for its review. For land
development projects, the Developer/Owner shall provide all information needed to complete the
review and pay all review and relataed fees.
1.8.2 State Construction Code
The State of Utah Construction codes and rules, with amendments, are incorporated by reference.
These codes and rules apply to policy, planning, criteria and construction of public water system
and prevail if a conflict exists with the Criteria.
1.8.3 NSF International Standards
All pipe, valves, fittings, and other water system components that contact water within the public
water system shall comply with the applicable standards of NSF International. These include
NSF 60 (Water Treatment Chemicals), NSF 61 Annex G, and NSF 372 (Drinking Water System
Components).
1.9 Variances from these Criteria
Modifications to these Criteria shall require a formal variance request. Variances from the
provisions of these Criteria may be considered on a case-by-case basis for specific
applications only, and shall not establish a precedent for any other project or future
development.
1.10 Adoption of the Utah American Public Works Association (APWA)
Standard Plans and Specifications
The latest Utah APWA Manual of Standard Plans and Manual of Standard Specifications are
hereby adopted as the City of Moab Standard Details and Standard Specifications for water
system improvements. Variance from these standards must be approved by the City. In the event
that multiple standards apply, the City will determine the applicable standard.
1.11 Acronyms
As used in the City’s Water Criteria Manual, the following acronyms shall apply:
ANSI American National Standards Institute
APWA American Public Works Association
Page 116 of 171
ARV Combination Air Release/Vacuum Valve
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
AWWA American Water Works Association
CD and CDs Construction Drawing(s)
CFS Cubic Feet per Second
DIA Development Improvements Agreement
DIP Ductile Iron Pipe
DIPRA Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association
ERC Equivalent Residential Connections
HP High Point
Max Maximum
Min Minimum
NAVD North American Vertical Datum
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PE Professional Engineer
PRV Pressure Reducing Valve
PSI Pounds per Square Inch
PVC Polyvinyl Chloride
RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe
ROW Right-of-Way
1.12 Definitions of Terms
CODE or MUNICIPAL CODE shall mean the City of Moab Municipal Code, as amended.
CONSTRUCTION DRAWING(S) (CD or CDs) shall mean construction drawings prepared by a
Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Utah for the Developer and approved by the City
depicting public and/or private improvements to be constructed for the Project.
ENGINEER shall mean the Professional Engineer retained by the Developer responsible for the
creation and submission of utility reports and construction drawings to the City for approval for
the purpose of one-time construction of facilities.
CRITERIA or DESIGN CRITERIA shall mean the design criteria and requirements
contained herein for water facilities to be constructed in the City.
DETAILS or STANDARD DETAILS shall mean details issued by the City to be used in
Construction Drawings
DEVELOPER shall mean the party or parties desiring to construct public and/or private
improvements within City rights-of-way or easements, securing all required approvals and
permits from the City and other applicable entities, and assuming full and complete
responsibility for the Project.
Page 117 of 171
DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (DIA) shall mean a formal agreement
between an annexation applicant or Developer and the City that comprehensively addresses
development conditions and obligations.
EASEMENT shall mean the right of the City to use lands owned by another party for the
purposes of maintenance, access, utilities, drainage or other use, as specified in an agreement.
MUNICIPAL CODE – See CODE.
OWNER shall mean the person(s) in title to any portion of the Property, according to the records
of the Grand County Recorder. The use of the singular “Owner” shall refer to all Owners of the
property.
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those improvements not identified as public
improvements, and which are not generally installed within the City rights-of-way, easements, or
other City-owned lands.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER shall mean an individual currently registered with the Utah
Division of Professional and Occupational Licensing as a professional engineer.
PROJECT shall mean the public or private improvements as designated in the approved
construction drawings to be constructed in conformance with these Design Criteria and the City
standard specification and details. The project is inclusive of any and all public or private
improvement projects for or within the City, whether development projects, private utility
projects or capital improvement projects.
PROPERTY shall mean the real property located in the City of Moab.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those public facilities including, but not limited to,
pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian/bike/equestrian paths, storm drain facilities with
related appurtenances, culverts, channels, bridges, water distribution, transmission and storage
facilities with related appurtenances, wastewater collection facilities with related appurtenances,
water purification facilities, pavement markings/ signage/striping, traffic signals and related
appurtenances, and those processes integral to construction of other Public Improvements listed
herein, which upon their completion are to be dedicated to the City for operation and
maintenance by the City and which are installed within the City rights-of-way, easements, or
other City-owned lands.
REGULATIONS shall mean ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the City, including
the Code, and other provisions of all zoning, subdivision and building codes or any other
applicable design criteria adopted by the City, as the same may be amended periodically and
applied uniformly throughout the City.
SHALL mean a mandatory requirement or condition, as approved by the City.
Page 118 of 171
STANDARD DETAILS – See DETAILS.
CITY shall mean the City of Moab, Utah
CITY COUNCIL shall mean the Moab City Council.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT shall mean the City Engineering Department.
CITY ENGINEER shall mean the City of Moab Engineer or other authorized representative of
the Engineering Department.
VARIANCE REQUEST shall mean a formal request with adequate documentation and
justification for a variance from the standards, provisions, policies or submittal requirements set
forth in these Design Criteria.
WATER MASTER PLAN shall mean the City of Moab Water Distribution and Storage Master
Plan
Page 119 of 171
2.1 Introduction
Provisions for adequate service, water supply, purification, storage, transmission and distribution
are necessary to preserve and promote the general health, welfare, and economic well-being of
the residents of the City of Moab. The City of Moab must provide coordination, review, and
master planning of the system in order that the integration of each component of the system
meets the intent and purpose of the system as a whole.
The development of the City’s water system is governed by the policies provided below, as
facilitated through the implementation of the Criteria contained herein.
2.2 Planning Policy
All land developed within the City that is served by the City’s public water system shall provide
planning and design for indoor and outdoor water demands. Reports and plans shall be
submitted for all new development and redevelopment within the City jurisdiction. These
reports shall conform to the requirements set forth herein and the provisions otherwise stipulated
by the City during the development process. Redevelopment shall be defined as any land
disturbance or reconstruction that results in a reconfiguration of existing water system facilities
or an increase in demands.
During the initial planning stages of the development, a pre-application meeting shall be
coordinated with the City of Moab Planning Department. One purpose of this meeting is to
assist the City and the developer to determine the level of water service that is available and
needed by the developer.
2.3 Design Policy
Water system planning and design within the City shall adhere to the Criteria contained herein,
the administrative rules promulgated by the Utah Division of Drinking Water, the Utah Division
of Water Rights (for wells and water rights), and acceptance procedures of the City of Moab, any
applicable watershed protections ordinances, drinking water source protections zones and the
applicable water related master plans prepared for the City. Prohibited facilities and connections
shall be as described in these criteria.
2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy
The construction of improvements for and within the City shall conform to the City’s
construction permit, standard specifications, standard details and approved plans, and shall
adhere to all City, County, State, and Federal regulations applicable to the work. This shall
include the acquisition of all necessary permits, which may include but not be limited to, stream
alteration permits, discharge permits, road cut permits, flood plain related permits and letters
Page 120 of 171
(including FEMA review and approval when applicable), Utah Division of Drinking Water
approvals, traffic control permits and all other required permits and approvals. At the completion
of construction, all permits and service agreements with power companies and any other private
utilities shall be transferred into the Customer’s name, and shall under no circumstances be
transferred to, or held in the name of the City, unless the City is the customer. Any work
proposed to take place within existing City of Moab streets must be reviewed and approved by
the City. The type of crossing allowed, traffic control, street repair specifications, etc. shall be as
determined by the City.
Prior to placing the facilities into service and initial acceptance by the City, all construction
related provisions required by the City shall be satisfied, including startup procedures,
inspections and testing of the facilities, and receipt of O&M Manuals and Record Drawings.
Additionally, all requirements and responsibilities of the warranty period will be met.
2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy
The delineation between City-owned and privately owned portions of the system and the
associated maintenance responsibilities for each, shall be as set forth in the latest editions of the
Municipal Code, standard details and previous agreements and policies in effect with the City.
Upon execution of final acceptance, the water mains and all appurtenant City-owned facilities,
shall become the sole property of the City, and full legal and equitable title thereto shall be
vested in the City free and clear of any liens, claims, or rights of any third party in or to the
public improvements.
2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy
The design of all water system facilities within the City must provide for access and long-term
operation and maintenance of the facilities by the City. Operation and Maintenance manuals
associated with all components to be installed as part of the water system shall be provided to the
City with the Record Drawings required in these Criteria, unless otherwise specifically waived
by the City.
Utility easements, dedicated tracts and access easements shall be provided for all water system
facilities outside of public right-of-way as set forth in these Criteria, or as otherwise required by
the City, and shall be adequate for the operation, maintenance and replacement of the facilities.
2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy
Public safety and the protection of City staff shall be an essential objective when planning,
designing, constructing, operating and maintaining the City’s water system facilities. All such
facilities shall be designed with careful consideration of the potential hazards associated with the
use and long-term operation and maintenance of the facility. The design phase of all projects
Page 121 of 171
shall evaluate the health and safety risks associated with the facilities, and shall include
appropriate design features to minimize these risks and to adequately protect the general public
and City personnel from the hazards. Equipment for confined space entry in accordance with
OSHA and other applicable regulatory agency requirements shall be provided at all City of Moab
facilities, as required. Hatches with fall prevention covers, intermediate platforms, handrails,
safety lighting, etc. shall be as required by the City, or any applicable code.
2.8 Duty of the Professional Engineer Preparing Development
Documents
These standards establish criteria and policies for the design and subsequent construction of the
City’s public water system. These standards are not intended to substitute for engineering
knowledge, judgement or experience. It is the responsibility of the design professional engineer
to understand and apply sound engineering principals related to public water systems to the
planning, design and construction of water system improvements. It is also the responsibility of
the design engineer to understand all federal, state and local regulations related to the public
water system.
These criteria should be reviewed by the developer’s engineer, who shall evaluate their
applicability. If the design engineer identifies criteria that are inapplicable or inappropriate in a
specific location or specific situation, the development engineer shall bring the issue to the
attention of the City.
Page 122 of 171
3.1 Introduction
The requirements presented in this chapter shall be used to aid the Engineer or Applicant in the
preparation of utility reports, modeling evaluations, and construction drawings for water system
facilities. This chapter applies primarily to submittal requirements for water distribution systems
and the associated Criteria provided in Chapter 4. The requirements presented herein are the
minimum necessary, and will be used to evaluate the adequacy of all submittals made to the City.
3.2 Review Process
3.2.1 Pre-Application Consultation
A pre-application consultation with the City of Moab is required for any type of development or
redevelopment. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss general information about the project,
pertinent aspects of the Criteria, the required scope of the utility reports, and any special
procedures, analyses, and submittal requirements that may be applicable.
3.2.2 Water Utility Report Requirements
Preliminary and final water utility reports shall be provided to the City of Moab. The purpose of
the preliminary water utility report is identify existing water infrastructure, provide preliminary
estimates of water demand needs, provide an initial plan for water infrastructure and determine
the feasibility of providing water service to the development via the public water system. The
purpose of the final water utility report, which is to be submitted with the final construction
plans, is to identify the final water infrastructure plan.
3.2.2.1 Format
All required reports shall be prepared on 8½" x 11” paper (maps and figures may be on larger
paper) and be bound. Supporting drawings, figures, and tables shall be bound into the reports or
included in an attached pocket. Reports shall include a narrative presenting the project for
review in accordance with the information presented in these Criteria, and the requirements
established by the City for the appropriate submittal.
Paper and electronic (PDF) copies of the report shall be provided. Electronic files of computer
models and GIS files shall be provided if requested by the City.
3.2.2.2 Stand-Alone Document
The water utility reports shall be stand-alone documents. When references are made or
assumptions are based on previously submitted reports, the reports must include the appropriate
excerpts, pages, tables, and maps containing the referenced information. Assumptions made in
previous reports must be verified and substantiated in subsequent reports. Reports shall be
legible, or a resubmittal will be required.
Page 123 of 171
3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy
Any report with incomplete or missing information shall result in the report being returned
without review. The City reserves the right to require additional information beyond that
specifically required in these Criteria.
3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies
The review and approval of the project by Federal, State and local agencies other than the City,
shall be the responsibility of the Developer. The Developer shall be required to address all
referral agency comments, and to have such comments incorporated into the applicable utility
report and plans submitted to the City.
3.3 Acceptance
3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction
The final water utility report shall conform to the construction documents to be used to bid the
project, and shall be approved by the City prior to the construction of any water system
improvements.
3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report
The approval of the final water utility report shall expire simultaneously with the expiration of
the approval of the project approval unless extended in conformance with the provisions of the
Municipal Code. At the time the approval of the final utility report expires, the report shall be
deemed invalid and a resubmittal will be required. In order to be re-approved, it must be
demonstrated that the concepts, designs, and calculations presented in the report are consistent
with the City’s current Criteria.
3.4 Preliminary Water Utility Report
The Preliminary Water Utility Report shall review and discuss the existing water system
infrastructure and the water needs of the development. The report shall also identify the existing
infrastructure needed to support the development. The City Engineering Department and Public
Works Department will coordinate with the developer to provide needed water system data.
The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Preliminary
Water Utility Report that shall be submitted:
I. TITLE SHEET
A. Name of Project, including legal name of development.
B. Address.
C. Owner.
Page 124 of 171
D. Developer.
E. Engineer.
D. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable.
II. TABLE OF CONTENTS
III. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
A. Site Location.
1. Site Vicinity Map.
2. Township, Range, Section, and 1/4 Section.
3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development.
4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments.
B. Description of Property and Land Use.
1. Total area in acres.
2. Discussion of project phasing, if applicable.
3. Total number of ERCs proposed for the development at build-out with a
breakdown of units by type projected by phase (if applicable) calculated
by utilizing the Utah Administrative Code Minimum Sizing Requirements
{R309-510 U.A.C.}.
4. Area (acres) and land use for all parcels to be served within the
development boundaries (initial and future phases, if applicable) and
number of lots if available.
5. Easements/tracts may not be known at this time; however, provide a
statement that easements or tracts necessary for utilities will be provided
at time of either platting or at time of preliminary site plan, in accordance
with City standards regarding location and size of easements and tracts.
6. Major and minor drainage ways and floodplains.
7. Existing irrigation canals or ditches.
8. Significant geologic features and topography.
9. Existing On-Site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS).
10. Existing Drinking Water Source Projection Zones within the project
boundary.
IV. ESTIMATED DEMANDS
A. Average Daily Demands.
Page 125 of 171
Tabulate the Average Daily Demand for the initial and future phases, if
applicable. Average Daily Demand shall be provided in both gallons/minute and
gallons/day. Indoor and outdoor demands should be included.
B. Peak Day Demands
1. Tabulate the Peak Day Demands for the initial and future phases, if
applicable. Peak Day Demands shall be provided in gallons/minute.
2. Fixture count estimates shall be prepared in accordance with the
International Plumbing Code with amendments as adopted.
3. The developer shall evaluate the type of building construction, and
building size and shall recommend a fire flow rate to the City. Final
determination will be made by the City Fire Official. The developer shall
indicate whether fire sprinklers are included in the building plan.
C. Peak Instantaneous Demands
1. Tabulated peak instantaneous demands for the initial and future phases, if
applicable, shall be provided.
V. EXISTING WATER SYSTEM
A. Existing Distribution System.
1. Discuss the existing transmission and distribution lines in the vicinity of
the development, including sizes and locations, which will need to be
extended to serve the proposed development.
2. Discuss any known shortcomings or bottlenecks associated with the
existing distribution system that may impact the City’s ability to
adequately deliver fire flows and meet the required demand conditions.
3. Discuss existing pressures at the proposed connection points to the
existing water system.
4. The City will provide information about the existing water system to the
developer in order to discuss the indicated issues.
VI. PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM
A. Proposed Distribution System.
1. Provide a general overview of the anticipated distribution system for the
development, including the proposed line sizes. Describe the tie-ins to the
existing water system and the sizes and lengths of any extensions
necessary to serve the development.
Page 126 of 171
2. Discuss looping as required by the City, particularly as it pertains to each
successive phase of development anticipated for the project.
B. Proposed Supply Facilities
1. Discuss any pump stations, wells, PRVs, storage reservoirs, purification
facilities, etc., that will likely be required to adequately serve the
development. This shall be done in coordination with the City.
VII. POTENTIAL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
General discussion of all foreseeable Federal, State, County, and Local permitting
requirements associated with the project.
VIII. REFERENCES
Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the
report.
3.4.1 Water System Modeling
The City maintains a water system model. Once the preliminary water system report is received
and found to be adequate, the City will determine whether water system modeling is required. If
the modeling is required, the City will determine the level of modeling needed for the
development and the cost of the modeling. The developer will be responsible for the cost of
water system modeling.
3.5. Engineering Department Responsibility
If the Engineering Department determines that the Preliminary Water Utility Report meets the
requirements set forth in these Criteria and adequate water rights are conveyed to the City, the
City will provide water at the designated tie-in points at available pressures. The City is not
responsible or liable for assumptions made by the Developer regarding utility information
associated with the proposed development.
3.6 Final Water Utility Report
The Final Water Utility Report shall describe all final water infrastructure, including finalized
modeling and calculations.
The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Final
Water Utility Report that shall be submitted with the Construction Documents:
I. TITLE SHEET
Page 127 of 171
A. Name of Project, including legal name of Development.
B. Address.
C. Owner.
D. Developer.
E. Engineer.
F. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable.
II. TABLE OF CONTENTS
III. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
A. Site Location.
1. Site Vicinity Map.
2. Township, Range, Section, and 1/4 Section.
3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development.
4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments.
B. Description of Property and Land Use.
1. Total area in acres.
2. Discussion of project phasing, if applicable.
3. Total number of ERCs proposed for the development at build-out with a
breakdown of units by type projected by phase (if applicable) calculated
by utilizing the Utah Administrative Code Minimum Sizing Requirements
{R309-510 U.A.C.}.
4. Area (acres), land use for all parcels to be served within the development
boundaries (initial and future phases, if applicable) and number of lots.
5. Summary of irrigated area, including open space and park areas (initial
and future phases, if applicable).
6. Sizes of schools, commercial and industrial buildings (initial and future
phases, if applicable).
7. Major and minor drainage ways and floodplains.
8. Existing irrigation canals or ditches.
9. Significant geologic features and topography.
10. Existing On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems.
11. Existing Drinking Water Source Projection Zones within the project
boundary.
IV. CALCULATED DEMANDS
A. Average Daily Demands.
Page 128 of 171
1. Tabulate the Average Daily Demand for the initial and future phases, if
applicable. Average Daily Demand shall be provided in both
gallons/minute and gallons/day. Indoor and outdoor demands should be
included.
B. Peak Day Demands.
1. Tabulate the Peak Day Demands for the initial and future phases, if
applicable. Peak Day Demands shall be provided in gallons/minute.
2. Fixture count estimates shall be prepared in accordance with the adopted
plumbing code.
3. The developer shall evaluate the type of building construction, and
building size and shall recommend a fire flow rate to the City. Final
determination will be made by the City Fire Official. The developer shall
indicate whether fire sprinklers are included in the building plan.
C. Peak Instantaneous Demands
1. Tabulated peak instantaneous demands for the initial and future phases, if
applicable, shall be provided.
V. EXISTING WATER SYSTEM
A. Existing Distribution System.
1. Discuss the existing transmission and distribution lines in the vicinity of
the development, including sizes and locations, which will need to be
extended to serve the proposed development.
2. Discuss any known shortcomings or bottlenecks associated with the
existing distribution system that may impact the City’s ability to
adequately deliver fire flows and meet the required demand conditions.
3. Discuss existing pressures at the proposed connection points to the
existing water system.
4. The City will provide information about the existing water system to the
developer in order to discuss the indicated issues.
VI. PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM
A. Proposed Distribution System.
1. Provide a general overview of the anticipated distribution system for the
development, including the proposed line sizes. Describe the tie-ins to the
Page 129 of 171
existing water system and the sizes and lengths of any extensions
necessary to serve the development.
2. Discuss looping as required by the Engineering Department, particularly
as it pertains to each successive phase of development anticipated for the
project.
B. Proposed Supply Facilities
1. Discuss any pump stations, wells, PRVs, storage reservoirs, purification
facilities, etc., that will likely be required to adequately serve the
development. This shall be done in coordination with the City.
VIII. PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND MODELING
A. Hydraulic Models.
1. The results of the final hydraulic modeling shall be described. The results of the
hydraulic modeling shall be attached to the final water utility report.
IX. POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ITEMS
Discuss any potential development agreement items such as needed off-site
improvements, improvements necessary for a project or project phase to be independently
sustainable, water facilities land dedication requirements, etc.
X. POTENTIAL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
General discussion of all foreseeable Federal, State, County, and Local permitting
requirements associated with the project.
XI. REFERENCES
Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the
report.
3.6.1 Disclaimer
The City is not responsible or liable for assumptions made by the Developer regarding utility
information associated with the proposed development.
Page 130 of 171
3.7 Construction Drawings
3.7.1 Water System Improvements
Water system Improvements within public rights-of-way or utility easements are required to be
designed, approved, and constructed in accordance with the City’s criteria, subdivision
requirements of the Municipal Code, the City’s standard specifications and details, sound
engineering principles, and the conditions of any variances obtained from the City.
3.7.2 Indemnification Statement
Construction drawings are reviewed by the City for concept only. The review does not imply
responsibility by the City of Moab for accuracy and correctness of calculations. Furthermore,
the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required.
The review shall not be construed for any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the
City for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase.
3.7.3 Construction Drawing Requirements
In general, construction drawings shall include plan and profile drawings that convey the
horizontal and vertical alignment of the improvements, and all other pertinent plans, sections and
detailing necessary to construct the proposed facilities.
All construction drawings submitted to the City for review, comment, and approval of water
system improvements shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of a Professional
Engineer licensed in the State of Utah. Said Professional Engineer shall be responsible for the
information contained on the construction drawings, which shall bear the Professional Engineer’s
seal prior to final approval for construction.
The Developer, Contractor, and Professional Engineer associated with the construction drawings
shall be responsible for the adequacy and satisfactory performance of the designs and the
installation of all items therein, and any failure or unsatisfactory performance of the system, so
constructed, shall not be a cause for action against the City. Approval of the construction
drawings by the City signifies only that the construction drawings meet the minimum
stipulations of these design criteria and City requirements based upon the information provided
to the City by the Professional Engineer and/or Developer, and makes no finding, representation,
or warranty that the system and associated components will perform satisfactorily.
3.7.3.1 Water Utility Construction Drawings
In addition to the general formatting and information to be included on all sheets of a
construction drawing set (e.g., north arrow, scale, project boundaries, lot lines, rights-of-way,
tracts, approval blocks, etc.), the following information shall be included on the final Water
Utility Plans.
1. Legend: Each sheet shall show the symbols pertaining to the sheet.
Page 131 of 171
2. Vertical Datum: All elevations used for the planning, design and construction of
facilities shall be on the NAVD88 Datum.
3. Horizontal Benchmark and Coordinates: The horizontal benchmark shall be
specified. In order to facilitate the Engineering Department’s GIS mapping
efforts, all basemapping providd to the City shall be placed in the State Plane
NAD83, Utah Central Zone Coordinate System and include the coordinates of a
known property corner on or adjacent to the site.
4. Plan views shall be oriented so that north is up on the sheet or to the right.
5. Water utility construction notes shall be provided for City review.
6. Overall Water System: In plan view, provide all information and dimensions for
horizontal layout of proposed water mains including but not limited to valves,
thrust blocks, reducers, tees, bends, crosses, fire hydrants, domestic water service
taps, lines and meters, irrigation taps, pressure reducing valves (PRVs),
combination air release/vacuum valves (ARVs) and vents, blow-off assemblies,
and any other appurtenances that are part of the potable water system.
7. Plan views shall show the locations and sizes of all existing and proposed utility
lines and appurtenances (water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, gas, electric,
telephone, cable, fiber optic, etc.) on and adjacent to the site. Plan views shall
show the location of all existing water wells and On-Site Wastewater Treatment
System (OWTS) on and adjacent to the site.
8. Plan views shall show existing water mains with sizes; valves; domestic and
irrigation water service taps, lines and meters; fire hydrants; pressure reducing
valves (PRVs); combination air release/vacuum valves (ARVs); and blow-off
assemblies on and adjacent to the site.
9. Plan views shall show existing and proposed curb, gutter, and sidewalks; and all
existing and proposed strucutures, such as vaults, catch basins, traffic islands,
street lights, walls or other permanent structures on and adjacent to the site.
10. Plan views and profiles shall show the tie-ins to the existing water distribution
system, including sizes of existing mains. In addition, the nearest water main
valves on existing mains shall be shown or, at a minimum, the distance to these
valves shall be included on the construction drawings.
11. Plan views and profiles shall show all needed off-site improvements, extensions
of service or upgrades to the City’s water distribution system.
12. Plan views shall show and label the type and width of all existing and proposed
easements that are on and adjacent to the site.
13. Profile drawings are required for off-site construction and all water mains outside
of streets. All profile drawings shall include existing and final grade lines. In
certain instances, water main profiles may be waived if approved by the City. If a
water main profile is waived, then the following information shall be included:
Page 132 of 171
a. All high points (HP) and low points (LP) along the water mains shall be
identified;
b. Where required by these Criteria, ARVs, vents and blow-offs shall be
shown throughout the water system, with the TOP and BOP elevations
provided; and
c. All utility crossings shall be identified.
14. Profile views or plan views: Adequate pipe elevation information is required for
all utility crossings of water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, gas, electric lines, etc.
The following information shall be included:
a. Types and sizes of the utility lines at the crossing and the stationing of the
crossing; and
b. If any pipes at crossing are encased, the coordinates at each end of the
encasement, and the type and thickness of the encasements shall be
specified. In addition, all utility crossing shall include either:
(1) A reference to the sheet where the crossing information is shown;
or
(2) Top of pipe and bottom of pipe elevations and vertical clearance at
the crossing with a callout of “(Min. = 1.5’)” wherever the
clearance is 2 feet or less.
15. Water System Details: All pertinent details related to water system improvements,
such as pipe and fitting restraints, hydrant installations, PRVs, ARVs, blow-off
assemblies, utility crossings, trenching, etc., shall be shown on detail sheets on the
construction drawings. Where applicable, references to the City standard details
may be provided rather than reproducting the City standards in the construction
drawings. Specific detail numbers number be referenced with options indicated if
applicable.
16. Plan views shall show the boundaries of the City’s pressure zones or a note shall
be added stating the pressure zone if the entire site is in only one pressure zone.
17. The construction drawings shall contain the following note: “Contractor shall
notify the City of Moab Public Works Department of any work that requires
shutdown or interruption of service of existing water mains two weeks prior to the
proposed shutdown or interruption unless otherwise approved by the City.”
3.8 Record Drawings
All water system improvements constructed within public rights-of-way and dedicated easements
must be formally accepted by the City. The City’s acceptance process will confirm that the
improvements have been constructed in accordance with the City’s current Criteria.
Page 133 of 171
4.1 Reference Design Documents
Primary standards and reference publications pertinent to the design of drinking water facilities
within the City of Moab are listed below. Unless otherwise specified, the latest editions shall
apply.
• Utah State Code Annotated
• Utah Administrative Code {R309}
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
• Utah Chapter of the American Public Works Association (Utah APWA)
• American Water Works Association (AWWA)
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
• Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association (DIPRA)
• City of Moab Municipal Code
• Cross Connection Control Program of Utah (April 2016)
4.2 Prohibited Installations
The following installations are prohibited unless otherwise approved by the City. Certain items
listed below reference Sections contained in these Criteria that provide the minimum design
requirements to be addressed, should a variance be pursued.
• Private Water Booster Pumps (requires an exception from the Utah Division of
Drinking Water)
• Unmetered Service Connections
4.3 Unlawful Connections
No installation of potable water supply piping or part thereof shall be made in such a manner that
it will be possible for used, unclean, polluted, or contaminated water, mixtures, or substances to
enter any portion of such piping from any tank, receptacle, equipment, or plumbing fixture by
reason of back siphonage, suction, back pressure, or any other cause, either during normal use
and operation, or when any such tank receptacle, equipment, or plumbing fixture is flooded, or
subject to pressure in excess of the main line operating pressure. No person shall make a
connection or allow one to exist between pipes or conduits carrying domestic water supplied by
the City and any pipes, conduits, or fixtures containing or carrying water, chemicals, liquids,
gases, or any other non-potable substance from any other source except as allowed by the Utah
Cross Connection Control Program. All connections must be approved by the City.
Page 134 of 171
4.4 Minimum Water System Design Criteria
This section presents the minimum technical criteria for the analysis and design of water systems
within the boundaries of the City of Moab, including distribution and transmission mains, water
service lines, and the applicable appurtenances associated with these installations. Any special
criteria beyond those contained herein, and as determined necessary by the City, shall be
discussed at the pre-application consultation.
4.4.1. Design Demands
Average daily demands, peak day demands and average annual demands shall be based on the
criteria included in the current Utah Administrative Code. This information is currently located
at {R309-510-7 U.A.C.}. The City Engineer may adjust the demand values based on the
evaluation of actual use data, a current master plan or other conditions determined to affect the
safety and welfare of the public.
4.4.1.1 Fire Flows
The developer shall develop recommended fire flows based on the currently adopted fire code,
the type of construction and the size of construction. This information is currently located in
Appendix E of the 2012 International Fire Code. Based on this information, the City Fire
Official will determine the fire flow required for each development.
4.4.2 Storage Requirements
Storage requirements shall be based on the criteria included in the current Utah Administrative
Code. This information is currently located at {R309-510-8 U.A.C.}. The City Engineer may
adjust the storage values based on the evaluation of actual use data, a current master plan or other
conditions determined to affect the safety and welfare of the public.
4.4.3 Minimum Hydraulic Performance Criteria
All mains shall be sized to provide for municipal, irrigation and fire protection demands to all
points in the City without violating the pressure criteria set forth herein. The maximum average
velocity must be a maximum of 6 feet/second, unless otherwise approved by the City.
The minimum and maximum pressures shall be as provided in the following table:
Hydraulic Condition Pressure*
Peak Day Demand Plus Fire Flow 20 psi min.
Peak Instantaneous Demand 30 psi min.
Peak Day Demand 40 psi min.
No Demand (static) 120 psi
max.
Exception: Areas of the water system approved before January 1, 2007
must maintain water pressures at the point of connection of 20 psi min.
Page 135 of 171
4.4.3.1 Operating Pressures and Pressure Zone Characteristics
The City of Moab water system included several pressure zones. The developer should consult
with the City to determine the range of pressures expected under normal operating conditions.
4.4.3.2 Location of Pressure Reducing Valves
If the water pressures within the development are expected to exceed the maximum pressure or if
it is anticipated that the development will cause pressures to increase in other areas of the water
system, the developer shall install a pressure reducing valve station to reduce pressures. Pressure
reducting valves are also required at pressure zone boundaries. The cost of the pressure reducing
valve stations for areas of new development will be borne by the developer.
4.4.4 Minimum Distribution Main Sizing and Valve Spacing
Water distribution mains shall have a minimum diameter of 8 inches. Isolation valves at
locations other than intersections shall be located with a distance between valves of not more
than 500 feet, except in residential zones spacing between valves may be 800 feet. The City may
approve exceptions in areas of widely scattered customers with no future anticipated
development.
Isolation valves are required in all directions at junctions, except for branches to fire hydrants.
For example, all tees shall have three valves. All crosses shall have four valves. Valves for fire
hydrants shall be in accordance with the City standard details.
4.4.5 General Water System Layout Criteria
4.4.5.1 Location
All water mains and appurtenances shall be installed in public right-of-way or dedicated utility
easements. Water mains shall not be installed parallel to and directly below, any concrete such as
sidewalks, trails, curbs, or gutters, and no water manholes or appurtenances shall be located in
multi-use trails and sidewalks. Mains shall be located in accordance with the City’s standard
details, unless otherwise approved by variance from the City. In public streets, water mains shall
be located near the shoulder of the road when possible. Otherwise the location should be
coordinated with the Cith Water Department. Under no circumstances shall the edge of a main
be closer than 5 feet from a gutter pan. Water system layouts in cul-de-sacs shall be in
accordance with the City’s Standard Details.
4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout
Horizontal separation from potable water mains to storm sewers and sanitary sewers shall be ten
feet, edge-to-edge. Horizontal separation from raw (untreated) water lines to storm sewers and
sanitary sewers shall be five feet, edge-to-edge. The City must specifically approve any variance
from this requirement in the event that it has been determined that it is impossible to maintain the
specified horizontal separation distance.
Page 136 of 171
Water mains adjacent to developments shall be designed to extend along the entire frontage of
the property to be served, from property line to property line, in order that service will thereupon
be available to adjacent Developers or Builders to subsequently extend from in the future. Any
off-site water mains necessary to serve the development property shall be extended at the sole
expense and obligation of the Developer.
Water main alignments in utility easements or tracts between structures (residences, businesses,
etc.) shall only be allowed for the purpose of looping a water main at the end of a cul-de-sac, and
shall include provisions for a Main-Break Swale as set forth in these Criteria. Under no
circumstances shall water mains be installed directly below any concrete such as sidewalks,
curbs, or gutters, except at 90-degree angles where crossings beneath the concrete features are
required.
4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout
The minimum depth of cover for water mains from final grade to the top of the water main shall
be 4 feet. The maximum depth of cover for water mains shall be 6 feet from top of pipe to final
grade unless associated with a water main lowering in accordance with the City’s Standard
Details, or as otherwise approved by the City. Under circumstances where a deeper main would
eliminate the need for an air valve, mains may be constructed with a cover up to 7.5 feet, and the
plans shall note that high points are to be avoided over such a reach.
In the event that the water line crosses a sewer line or storm drain line, the water line must be
above the sewer line and have a minimum separation of 18 inches.
4.4.6 Pipe Joint Deflection
Design of DIP deflections shall be in accordance with the latest edition of AWWA C600 entitled
“Installation of Ductile Iron Water Main and their Appurtenances”. Design of PVC pipe
deflections shall be in accordance with the latest edition of AWWA Manual M23 entitled “PVC
Pipe – Design and Installation”.
Water main joint deflection for DIP and PVC shall not exceed one half of the manufacturer’s
maximum allowable deflection for the specified pipe diameter and lay length, or one half of the
maximum deflection allowed by AWWA, whichever is less. Fittings, bends, or couplings that
allow additional angular offset shall be used to achieve gradual alignment changes that exceed
the axial joint deflection limits stated herein.
4.4.7 Distribution Main Looping
All water systems shall be effectively looped. No dead-end lines will be permitted except lines
extending into cul-de-sacs serving no more than 12 single-family residential units or equivalent
residential connections (ERCs) and with a length of no more than 400 feet. A fire hydrant shall
be placed at the deepest point of any cul-de-sac.
Page 137 of 171
Water quality is a design consideration for any system, and an aging analysis and/or model may
be required at the discretion of the City to insure that water quality concerns will not be created
as a result of any proposed distribution system layout. Water quality sampling stations may be
required by the City at specific locations within new developments to continue to adequately
monitor the overall quality of the City’s expanding system.
Distribution mains shall be PVC pipe in accordance with AWWA C-900 DR 18 or Ductile Iron
Pipe Class 350 in accordance with applicable AWWA standards. Other types of pipe material
may be approved by the City.
4.4.8 Transmission Mains
All water mains 16 inches and larger in diameter shall be classified as "transmission mains", and
shall correspond to the sizes established in the latest edition of the City’s water distribution and
storage master plan. Raw water lines that run between wells and points of disinfection or
purification, regardless of size, shall also be considered transmission mains. Air and vacuum
release valves shall be installed along transmission mains at all high points and pumping
manholes may be required at low points. Temporary blow-off assemblies shall be installed in
accordance with the City’s Standard Details at all temporary dead-ends along transmission
mains. No service connections, including irrigation taps, shall be permitted on a transmission
main.
Transmission main valves shall be butterfly valves, and shall be required on every branch where
two transmission mains connect. Valves shall be installed in accordance with the City’s Standard
Details and shall be located 10 feet from the connection wherever possible, but shall in no case
be less than 5 feet. Maximum valve spacing along transmission mains shall be no more than
1,200 feet, provided there are no intersecting distribution mains.
Where distribution mains connect to transmission mains, a gate valve is required on the
distribution main, and the goal shall be to locate butterfly valves along the transmission main so
that no more than 16 residential units and one fire hydrant will be out of service at any given
time, whether for maintenance, or in the event of a water main break. It is the responsibility of
the developer to verify compliance with this requirement by considering effective looping, as
well as other applicable requirements.
Transmission mains shall be PVC pipe in accordance with AWWA C-900 DR 18 or C-905 DR
18 or Ductile Iron Pipe (Cement Morter Lined) Class 350 or Class 250 in accordance with
applicable AWWA standards. Other types of pipe material may be approved by the City.
4.4.9 Bored Crossings
When a water main passes under a State roadway, an arterial or collector roadway as defined by
the City, railroad, drainage way or irrigation ditch, the main shall be located within bored steel
casing pipe, unless otherwise allowed to be open cut by the jurisdictional entity being crossed.
Page 138 of 171
The carrier pipe shall be sleeved and sealed within the casing pipe and shall have a minimum of
4 feet of cover to top of casing. The casing pipe shall extend the entire width of the right-of-way
or easement of the crossing structure, or as directed by the City or other jurisdictional entity.
Valves with appropriate restrained lengths shall be located near each right-of-way or easement
line, just beyond the ends of the casing pipe, to provide for the isolation of the main during
maintenance or inspection.
Crossings at ditches shall include cutoff walls at each side of the crossing, either as required by
the jurisdictional entity, or as analyzed and designed by the Engineer at the direction of the City
and shall comply with {R309-550-8(8) U.A.C.}.
Casing pipe shall be smooth-walled, non-coated pipe of welded steel construction conforming to
ANSI/AWWA C200, and shall be seamless or straight seam steel pipe with minimum yield
strength of 35,000 psi. The casing pipe shall be constructed of new material and have a minimum
wall thickness as follows unless specified otherwise.
Carrier Pipe Nominal
Diameter
Min. Casing
Pipe O.D. Min. Wall Thickness*
4” 12” 0.250”
6” 14” 0.250”
8” 16” 0.322”
12” 20” 0.375”
*The boring contractor shall determine the necessary casing wall thickness and
provided a wall thickness that is greater than included in the above table if
needed. Other diameter pipes sizes shall be designed by a professional
engineer and submitted to the City of Moab for review.
Casing pipe shall be cathodically protected by burying a pair of sacrificial anodes 10 feet from
each end of the casing. Anode wires shall pass from the casing pipe to terminal boards inside
surface-mounted cast iron lids at each casing end, and then on to the anodes themselves. All
anodes shall be buried vertically or horizontally with the top of the anodes set at a depth equal to
the casing spring line. Anode pairs shall be offset perpendicularly 5 feet away from the casing
pipe, and shall be placed in native soils, not imported backfills. The cathodic protection system
shall be designed by competent technical personnel experienced with these types of systems, and
shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Long-term maintenance of the system,
including anode assessment and replacement, shall be addressed in the submittal.
4.4.10 Appurtenances
4.4.10.1 Valves
All water distribution systems shall have valves to ensure that no more than 500 feet of main will
be out of service in the event of a single water main break, except for residential area where 800
Page 139 of 171
feet of main may be out of service. Valve placement at water main intersections shall be such
that three valves are required at every tee and four valves at every cross. Existing valves may be
utilized to satisfy these requirements. Valves shall be the same nominal size as the adjacent pipe.
Post indicator valves shall be placed on private fire lines, unless this requirement is waived by
the fire official. Valves shall be placed on the branch serving a fire hydrant.
Valves shall be located to provide for the extension, pressure testing, and chlorination of new
water mains without the disruption of the existing system. Additional valves shall be considered
by the developer to minimize inconveniences and safety hazards during repairs at critical
locations within the system, and to provide for the ability to conduct water quality monitoring
and alleviate water quality concerns that may be reasonably anticipated.
Valves up to 12 inches shall be resilient seated gate valves which meet requirements of AWWA
C-509.
Valves 14 inches and larger shall be butterfly valves, with valve operators located on the north
and east sides of the mains. Under no circumstances shall a valve be located in concrete, such as
sidewalks, cross pans, aprons, curbs, or gutters. Valves shall meet requirements of AWWA C-
504.
Valve boxes shall be in accordance with City Standard Details and shall be brought up to grade
at the time of pavement placement or overlay. Any valve located in an unpaved area shall have a
reinforced concrete collar around the valve box and the accompanying marker.
Temporary dead-ends on any water main shall include a temporary blow-off. Dead-ends on lines
that will not be extended shall be provided with permanent hydrants at the terminus of the dead
end.
4.4.10.2 Pressure Reducing Valves
Pressure-reducing valve (PRV) installations are used to control and maintain pressure between
distribution pressure zones, and shall be installed at locations determined by the City.
Downsizing of the main shall not be allowed at the valve, unless approved by the City. The City
shall determine the PRV pressure settings necessary to maintain the City’s pressure zones, shall
be present when PRVs are put into service, and shall inspect these facilities.
4.4.10.3 Fire Hydrants
Fire hydrant spacing and proximity to structures shall be as required by the latest version of the
State of Utah adopted fire code, however spacing between hydrants at and adjacent to the project
shall not exceed 500-feet. The distance between fire hydrants shall be measured along an
unobstructed path. All hydrants shall be installed to conform to the grade and alignment shown
on the plans.
Page 140 of 171
All fire hydrant locations will ultimately be subject to the approval of the City Fire Chief.
Hydrants shall be placed as shown in the City’s Standard Details within the right-of-way or in a
utility easement. Wherever possible, hydrants shall be located on the same side of the street as
the water main, unless otherwise directed by the City. Preference shall be given to locating
hydrants near street corners, rather than to locations near streetlights. Hydrants shall be located
at the end of every cul-de-sac.
When hydrants are to be installed at locations other than street intersections, they shall be located
at the extension of property side lot lines. In no case shall a hydrant be located closer than 5 feet
to obstructions, driveways, etc., and no closer than 10 feet from a curb inlet. Fences,
landscaping, etc., shall in no way hinder the operation of the fire hydrant.
Fire hydrant lateral lines shall be set at 90 degrees to mains and shall be no more than 70 feet in
length between the hydrant and the main. Tap shall not be made on a hydrant lateral.
The make and model of the installed fire hydrants must be approved by the Public Works
Department.
4.4.10.4 Thrust Restraint
All bends, tees, crosses, wyes, plugs, dead-ends, wet taps (in certain cases), hydrants, blow-offs
and other fittings with unbalanced thrust forces shall be designed and constructed with concrete
thrust blocks in accordance with the City’s Standard Details. If the soil-bearing capacity is
unknown, it shall be assumed to be 2,000-pounds/square foot in determining the appropriate size
of the thrust block. In addition to thrust blocks, joints shall be mechanically restrained for the
required distances from valves and fittings. The entire length of fire hydrant lines and fire
service lines, as well as pipe in fill areas, shall be restrained.
4.4.10.5 Meters and Service Connections
All service connections shall be metered. In general, residential and commercial meters shall be
installed within the public right of way and shall conform to the City Standard Drawings. Fire
lines are not considered service connections for this requirement and don’t require a meter.
All meters connected to the City's water distribution system shall be the property of the City.
Under no circumstances shall anyone other than City personnel remove a water meter once the
pit, vault, or authorized inside installation has been inspected and approved. No connections
shall be made in the meter pit other than those directly related to the meter and bypass. Single-
family residential irrigation system connections shall be made downstream from the meter and
double check backflow prevention assembly. All other uses require irrigation service connections
separate from the domestic service connection.
Maximum design flows through meter shall be limited to 80% of the maximum rate flow. The
continuous flow shall be limited to 50% of the maximum rated flow. In all cases, the maximum
Page 141 of 171
and minimum flows shall be within the flow range and performance requirements of the meter
manufacturer.
For all water meter installations, detailed drawings of the proposed installation, indoor and
outdoor water use volumes and flowrates and water fixture unit counts shall be included as an
integral part of the plans submitted to the City for review. There shall be no electrical wiring
allowed in any water meter pit or vault unless authorized in writing by the City. Fixture unit
counts for residential, commercial or industrial use shall be determined by a Professional
Engineer in accordance with the procedures set forth in plumbing code, and as approved by the
City.
4.4.10.6 Fire Protection Service Lines
Fire service lines shall be ductile iron (3-inch diameter and larger) or type K copper (2 inch
diameter and smaller) from the main to the backflow prevention assembly unless approved by
the City Fire Department. All fire service lines shall be fully restrained in their entirety.
The customer/owner shall own and maintain all private fire service lines from the tap on the
main to the building. All fire sprinkler taps shall be installed with a backflow prevention
assembly approved by the City and as required by the latest edition of the Utah Cross-
Connection Control Manual. A flow switch shall be provided on the riser that indicates whether
or not water has flowed through the line. Tapping these lines for fire hydrants, domestic water,
and/or any other purpose shall not be permitted. Commercial properties requiring a domestic
service line and a fire protection service line shall have separate taps for each.
Fire protection service lines and fire department connection (FDC) locations shall be included on
the Construction Drawings. FDCs are to be freestanding in a location approved by the Fire
Official and shall be constructed as required by the Fire Official.
4.4.10.7 Manholes
Manholes shall be installed in conjunction with all air release vaults in accordance with the
City’s Standard Details. Manhole lids shall not be aligned with vehicle wheel paths, or within 2
feet either direction of the street crown.
4.4.10.8 Backflow Prevention Assemblies
To prevent backflow contamination of the City's potable water mains, a backflow prevention
assembly shall be installed where pressures downstream of the water meter could exceed those in
the main, and where any unsafe water or contaminated materials could be discharged, or drawn
into the potable water system under a condition of back-siphonage. The assembly shall be placed
downstream of the water meter and shall be installed and tested in accordance with City’s Cross
Connection Control Program. The assemblies shall meet the most restrictive requirements set
forth in the latest editions of the City of Moab and State of Utah Cross-Connection Control
Programs, and shall further meet the requirements of the adopted plumbing codes. Backflow
Page 142 of 171
prevention assemblies shall be installed and located to provide for proper operation of the device,
and easy access for annual testing and maintenance.
Determination of the particular device shall be at the discretion of the Public Works Department.
All service connections, including irrigation and fire line connections, shall require backflow
prevention.
4.4.10.9 Combination Air Release and Vacuum Valves
Combination air relief valves and vaults shall be located at all high points in the transmission and
distribution system in accordance with the City’s Standard Details.
4.4.10.10 Blow-off Pumping Manholes
In accordance with the City’s Standard Details, a pumping manhole shall be installed at all low
points on transmission mains.
4.4.10.11 Tracer Wire and Warning Tape
Tracer wire shall be affixed to the top of all water mains regardless of pipe material and
terminated in test stations located behind each fire hydrant or in valve boxes. The maximum
distance between test stations or tracer wire boxes shall be 500 feet. Warning tape shall be
installed one foot above the top of pipe on all water mains, regardless of pipe material.
4.4.11 Fill Areas
Where water mains will be constructed in fill areas, all fill materials shall be placed and
compacted to final grade prior to the installation of the water main and appurtenances. All fill
material shall meet the City’s standards and be approved by the City. Water mains within fill
areas shall have restrained joints in accordance with these Criteria.
4.4.12 Trail Access
Where water mains cannot be located in public right-of-way, the facilities shall be located in
areas that allow direct access by maintenance vehicles. Proposed trails to be used to access water
mains and appurtenances must meet the following requirements, and shall be submitted for
review and approval by the City:
1. The longitudinal slope must not exceed 10% and the cross slope must not exceed
4% unless approved by the City.
2. The Parks Department must approve this use.
3. The width of the drivable surface shall be a minimum of 10 feet for a straight
portion of trail and at least 12 feet wide for curved portions, depending on the
curve radii. A shoulder may be required.
4. The trail shall be designed to support an AASHTO HS-20 load.
5. The trail must be in a utility, public access or trail easement a minimum of 20 feet
wide.
Page 143 of 171
Information regarding the width, type and depth of material specified for trails to be used to
access water system facilities shall be submitted for review by the City, and shall include
acknowledgement from the Parks Department that utility access is approved for the particular
trail.
4.4.13 Main-Break Swale Design
All water mains to be constructed between structures (residences, businesses, etc.) must have a
“main-break” swale or channel that provides adequate capacity in the event of a water main
break. The swale must be located in a dedicated open space or utility tract maintained by the
Owner.
4.4.14 Future Connections
A temporary blow-off assembly, is required at the terminal end of any water main that is to be
extended in the future. Such discontinued mains shall have valves located such that only a single
valve will need to be closed when the main is extended. Joints shall be restrained an adequate
distance from the valve per the City’s Standard Details to ensure that the valve will not blow off
when the line is exposed for extension. No service taps shall be allowed between the isolation
valve and the dead end on any main that may be extended in the future.
4.4.15 Water Service Lines
All single family residential dwellings, each individual unit in multi-family complexes, including
duplexes, and each commercial business, industrial, and irrigation customer shall be served by a
separate, independent water service line and meter. The City will consider the use of a single
water meter for multi-family complexes if requested by the Developer and if sub-metering of
individual units is provided.
4.4.15.1 Layout
The Developer shall install a service line stub-out from the water main to each individual lot,
including the corporation stop valve and meter box. Where sidewalks are proposed, the stub-out
shall be constructed to five feet beyond the back of the sidewalk. Where sidewalks will not be
constructed, the stub-out shall be constructed a minimum of one foot beyond the property line.
The stub-outs shall be plugged and the end marked with a blue painted T-post installed in the
ground directly above the location of the plugged end.
All service line sizes and locations shall be shown on the water system Construction Drawings to
be approved by the City. The services shall be constructed as shown on the construction
drawings unless otherwise approved in writing by the City. The stationing, length, size and
direction of the service line shall be shown in plan view on the construction drawings.
Page 144 of 171
4.5 Easements
Where mains cannot be installed in right-of-way, they shall be located within utility easements
approved by the City and shall be centered in the easement. The minimum easement width shall
be 20 feet for one utility. The width of easements which include more than one utility will be
determined by the City. Site-specific circumstances may dictate the need for wider easements.
Utility easements and dedicated utility tracts shall be defined by bearings and distances around
the perimeter of the easement. Centerline legal descriptions are not acceptable.
The main shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from and parallel to the edge of the utility
easement. All meters and fire hydrants not installed within the right-of-way will require an
easement dedication 10 feet wide and extending 3 feet behind the meter or hydrant. If the meter
or hydrant easement is longer than 10 feet, the width of the easement shall be a minimum of 20
feet. Fire hydrants and meters shall be centered in all such easements.
All utility easements shall be for the exclusive use of the City. No permanent structures, (e.g.,
retaining walls, trees, light pedestals, sign foundations, power poles, mailboxes, sheds, buildings,
etc.), shall be placed in the easement.
Where it is necessary to locate a water main along back lot lines, the main shall be offset a
minimum of 10 feet from the lot line, and the alignment shall be specifically approved by the
City to provide reasonable access for maintenance crews.
4.6 Testing and Disinfection
All distribution and transmission lines, and all other piping and fittings shall be flushed, pressure
and leak tested and disinfected. After disinfection, bacteriological samples shall be taken from
the lines. Pressure testing shall be in accordance with AWWA Standard C600-10. Disinfection
and bacteriological testing of facilities shall be in accordance with AWWA Standard C651-05.
Water lines and facilities shall not be connected to the public water system until the
bacteriological tests indicate that the water is free from contamination.
Page 145 of 171
5.1 General
5.1.1 Scope
It is not anticipated that developers will typically be involved in the design or construction of
wells, pump stations, storage tanks or water treatment systems which are part of the City’s public
water system. The City asserts the right to assume the lead design and construction roles for
these facilities. However, at the City’s option, the City may allow or require the developer to
design and construct these facilities related to the development. Design of these facilities will be
in accordance with the State of Utah Administrative Rules {R309 U.A.C} and the applicable
building codes.
Page 146 of 171
Moab City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: August 8, 2017
#: 9-1
Pl-17-112
Title: Consideration to Adopt Ordinance #2017-27, to Amend Chapter 17.15.050 of the
Moab Municipal Code and Revise Setbacks, Maximum Lot Coverage, and Clarify
Text/Table Conflicts
Date Submitted: August 1, 2017
Staff Presenter: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner
Attachment(s): Draft Ordinance #2017-27 with markups
Draft Ordinance #2017-27 without markups
Options: Approve, deny, or modify.
Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance #2017-27 amend chapter 17.15.050 of
the Moab Municipal Code by revising yard setbacks, maximum lot coverage, and some
building heights in the schedule of residential area regulations, to correct the designation
of which text should control, and to delete additional provisions.
Background/Summary:
This ordinance is a housekeeping effort to simplify the table in 17.15.050, Residential Area
Regulations Summary. Some of the additional requirements on residential development
have proven to be confusing to property owners. For example the code contains multiple
references to side yard setbacks as “First side”, “Second Side”, and a simple, “side yard
setback”. The proposed changes will minimize the number of descriptions for the same
element.
The ordinance also removes the many footnotes and the twelve foot separation between
accessory structures and the principal use. The lot coverage is increased for all uses on a lot
to 75%.
Attached for your reading pleasure is a marked copy showing suggested modifications to
the Code section and a clean copy that incorporates all of the changes to the document
including those of the Planning Commission.
Page 147 of 171
ORDINANCE #2017-27
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.15.050 OF THE MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE BY REVISING
YARD SETBACKS, MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE, AND SOME BUILDING HEIGHTS IN THE SCHEDULE OF
RESIDENTIAL AREA REGULATIONS, TO CORRECT THE DESIGNATION OF WHICH TEXT SHOULD
CONTROL, AND TO DELETE ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS LISTED AFTER THE SCHEDULE
The following entries describe the intent and purpose of the City of Moab in the adoption of
these amendments:
a.City staff became aware that many of the current parameters listed in the Schedule of
Residential Area Regulations (“Schedule”) were outdated and limiting constraints for property owners,
including those who desire to build an accessory dwelling unit on their property.
b.Facilitating the building of accessory dwelling units would alleviate the problems of housing
shortage and low-income housing shortage in Moab.
c.City staff became aware that the last sentence in the paragraph preceding the Schedule failed to
properly designate which text is controlling: the text in the Schedule or the text in the individual zoning
district chapters.
d.The Moab Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on June 22, 2017, to hear
and decide the merits of the proposed changes, and to receive public input. The Planning Commission
subsequently adopted Planning Resolution 31-2017 with the findings that the amendments were
justified and recommended approval by City Council.
e.The City Council reviewed Ordinance #2017-27 in a public meeting held on ___________ ___,
2017, to review the recommendation from the Planning Commission and consider the merits of the
ordinance.
f.The City Council finds that it is appropriate for the City to encourage the development of
housing within the City for all residents; that the proposed changes are consistent with the General Plan,
which encourages the development of affordable housing; and that the following amendments would
facilitate not only the building of accessory dwelling units, but all development of residential property in
the City.
g.The City Council further finds that the text which should be controlling in the event of a conflict,
whether in the Schedule or in the individual zoning district chapters, was not properly designated in the
paragraph preceding the Schedule.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council hereby ordains that the following changes to Moab Municipal Code
Section 17.15.050 are adopted and the Code chapter is amended as noted below:
Items in yellow shall be deleted from the code. Items in blue shall be added to the code:
Page 148 of 171
17.15.050 Residential area regulations summary.
A. Schedule of Residential Area Regulations. The following residential area regulations schedule
summarizes the regulations of this code with regard to minimum lot size, minimum yards setbacks,
maximum lot coverage, minimum floor area per dwelling unit, and maximum building height of
residential uses in the various zoning districts. The standards shown in the following schedule may be
modified by additional provisions contained in this section or in the individual district regulations. In the
event of any conflict between the text of this section and the schedule of residential area regulations,
the text shall control.
In the event of any conflict between the text of the individual zoning district chapters and the schedule
of residential area regulations below, the text of the individual zoning district chapter shall control.
Residential Area Regulations
Development Standard R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 RA-1
Single-Family Dwelling
Minimum Lot Area/Unit (sq
ft)
10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 43,560
Minimum Front Yard Setback
(ft)
25 (i) 15 15 15 25 (i)
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling, First Side (ft)
10 (iii) 7 7 7 10
Minimum Side Yard, Second
Side (ft)
14 7 7 7 14
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
20 15 12 12 25
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Interior (ft)
15 12 12 10 10 25
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft) 25 (ii) 20 15 15 12 20
Accessory Structures – Rear
and Side Setbacks (ft)
3 3 3 3 3
Max. Net Lot Coverage (%)* - 60* 75% 60* 75% 60* 75% - * See footnotes
(vi) and (vii)
Max. Building Height (ft) 40 30 30 30 30 40 30
Min. Lot Width (ft) 90 50 50 50 125
Minimum Ground Floor
Area/Structure (sq ft)
1,200 500 500 500 1,000
Duplex or Two-Family Dwelling
Minimum Lot Area/Unit (sq
ft)
- 3,000 sq
ft/dwelling
2,500 sq
ft/dwelling
2,500 sq
ft/dwelling
-
Minimum Front Yard Setback
(ft)
- 20 15 15 -
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling, First Side (ft)
- 7 7 7 -
Minimum Side Yard, Second
Side (ft)
- 7 7 7 -
Page 149 of 171
Development Standard R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 RA-1
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
- 15 12 12 -
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Interior (ft)
- 12 12 10 10 -
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
- 15 15 8 12 -
Accessory Structures – Rear
and Side Setbacks (ft)
3 3 3 3 3
Max. Net Lot Coverage (%)* - 60* 75% 60* 75% 60* 75% - * See footnotes
(vi) and (vii)
Max. Building Height (ft) - 30 30 30 -
Min. Lot Width (ft) - 50 50 50 -
Minimum Ground Floor
Area/Unit (sq ft)
- 500 500 500 -
Three-, Four-, Five- or Six-Family Dwelling
Minimum Lot Area/Unit (sq
ft)
- 2,000 sq
ft/dwelling
1,800 sq
ft/dwelling
-
Minimum Front Yard Setback
(ft)
- 15 15 -
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling, First Side (ft)
- 7 8 -
Minimum Side Yard, Second
Side (ft)
- 7 8 -
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
12 12 -
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Interior (ft)
12 10 10 -
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
15 10 12 -
Accessory Structures – Rear
and Side Setbacks (ft)
3 3 3 3 3
Max. Net Lot Coverage (%)* 60* 75% 60* 75% - * See footnotes
(vi) and (vii)
Max. Building Height (ft) 30 40 -
Min. Lot Width (ft) 50 50 -
Minimum Ground Floor
Area/Unit (sq ft)
300 250 -
(i) Or fifty-five feet from the centerline of any public street, whichever is greater.
(ii) For dwellings having an attached garage or carport the setback shall not be less than twenty feet.
(iii) Total of the two side setbacks shall be at least twenty -four feet for the primary dwelling.
Page 150 of 171
(iv) For the purpose of determining front, side and rear setback requirements any separate building situated
within twelve feet from a dwelling or other main building shall be considered as a part of the main building and not
as an accessory building.
(v) The minimum distance between dwellings located on the same or adjoining lots shall be sixteen feet. and the
total width of the two side yards shall be not less than one-third of the frontage of the dwelling or other main
building.
(vi) Net lot area is defined as the usable portion of the lot after setbacks are deducted from the lot area.
(vii) Maximum net lot coverage may be increased to seventy-five percent if the home is a single story structure.
PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City of Moab City Council. This ordinance shall take effect
no later than twenty (20) days from the date of publication.
SIGNED:
____________________
David L. Sakrison, Mayor Date
ATTEST:
Rachel Stenta, Recorder
CLEAN VERSION:
ORDINANCE #2017-27
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.15.050 OF THE MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE BY REVISING
YARD SETBACKS, MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE, AND SOME BUILDING HEIGHTS IN THE SCHEDULE OF
RESIDENTIAL AREA REGULATIONS, TO CORRECT THE DESIGNATION OF WHICH TEXT SHOULD
CONTROL, AND TO DELETE ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS LISTED AFTER THE SCHEDULE
The following entries describe the intent and purpose of the City of Moab in the adoption of
these amendments:
a. City staff became aware that many of the current parameters listed in the Schedule of
Residential Area Regulations (“Schedule”) were outdated and limiting constraints for property owners,
including those who desire to build an accessory dwelling unit on their property.
b. Facilitating the building of accessory dwelling units would alleviate the problems of housing
shortage and low-income housing shortage in Moab.
Page 151 of 171
c. City staff became aware that the last sentence in the paragraph preceding the Schedule failed to
properly designate which text is controlling: the text in the Schedule or the text in the individual zoning
district chapters.
d. The Moab Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on June 22, 2017, to hear
and decide the merits of the proposed changes, and to receive public input. The Planning Commission
subsequently adopted Planning Resolution 31-2017 with the findings that the amendments were
justified and recommended approval by City Council.
e. The City Council reviewed Ordinance #2017-27 in a public meeting held on August 8, 2017, to
review the recommendation from the Planning Commission and consider the merits of the ordinance.
f. The City Council finds that it is appropriate for the City to encourage the development of
housing within the City for all residents; that the proposed changes are consistent with the General Plan,
which encourages the development of affordable housing; and that the following amendments would
facilitate not only the building of accessory dwelling units, but all development of residential property in
the City.
g. The City Council further finds that the text which should be controlling in the event of a conflict,
whether in the Schedule or in the individual zoning district chapters, was not properly designated in the
paragraph preceding the Schedule.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council hereby ordains that the following changes to Moab Municipal Code
Section 17.15.050 are adopted and the Code chapter is amended as noted below:
17.15.050 Residential area regulations summary.
A. Schedule of Residential Area Regulations. The following residential area regulations schedule
summarizes the regulations of this code with regard to minimum lot size, minimum yard setbacks,
maximum lot coverage, minimum floor area per dwelling unit, and maximum building height of
residential uses in the various zoning districts. The standards shown in the following schedule may be
modified by additional provisions contained in this section or in the individual district regulations.
In the event of any conflict between the text of the individual zoning district chapters and the schedule
of residential area regulations below, the text of the individual zoning district chapter shall control.
Residential Area Regulations
Development Standard R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 RA-1
Single-Family Dwelling
Minimum Lot Area/Unit (sq
ft)
10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 43,560
Minimum Front Yard Setback
(ft)
25 15 15 15 25
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling (ft)
10 7 7 7 10
Page 152 of 171
Development Standard R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 RA-1
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
20 15 15 15 25
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Interior (ft)
15 12 10 10 25
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
20 15 15 15 20
Accessory Structures <10 sq
ft. Rear/Side Setbacks (ft)
3 3 3 3 3
Accessory Structures >10 sq
ft. – Rear/Side Setbacks (ft)
5 5 5 5 5
Max. Lot Coverage - 75% 75% 75% -
Max. Building Height (ft) 30 30 30 30 30
Min. Lot Width (ft) 90 50 50 50 125
Minimum Ground Floor
Area/Structure (sq ft)
1,200 500 500 500 1,000
Duplex or Two-Family Dwelling
Minimum Lot Area/Unit (sq
ft)
- 3,000 sq
ft/dwelling
2,500 sq
ft/dwelling
2,500 sq
ft/dwelling
-
Minimum Front Yard Setback
(ft)
- 20 15 15 -
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling (ft)
- 7 7 7 -
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
- 15 12 12 -
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Interior (ft)
- 12 10 10 -
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
- 15 15 12 -
Accessory Structures <10 sq
ft. Rear/Side Setbacks (ft)
3 3 3 3 3
Accessory Structures >10 sq
ft. – Rear/Side Setbacks (ft)
5 5 5 5 5
Max. Lot Coverage - 75% 75% 75% -
Max. Building Height (ft) - 30 30 30 -
Min. Lot Width (ft) - 50 50 50 -
Minimum Ground Floor
Area/Unit (sq ft)
- 500 500 500 -
Three-, Four-, Five- or Six-Family Dwelling
Minimum Lot Area/Unit (sq
ft)
- 2,000 sq
ft/dwelling
1,800 sq
ft/dwelling
-
Minimum Front Yard Setback
(ft)
- 15 15 -
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling (ft)
- 7 8 -
Page 153 of 171
Development Standard R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 RA-1
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
12 12 -
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Interior (ft)
10 10 -
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for dwelling, Corner (ft)
15 12 -
Accessory Structures <10 sq
ft. Rear/Side Setbacks (ft)
3 3 3 3 3
Accessory Structures >10 sq
ft. – Rear/Side Setbacks (ft)
5 5 5 5 5
Max. Lot Coverage 75% 75% -
Max. Building Height (ft) 30 40 -
Min. Lot Width (ft) 50 50 -
PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City of Moab City Council.
In effect upon passage.
SIGNED:
____________________
David L. Sakrison, Mayor Date
ATTEST:
Rachel Stenta, Recorder
Page 154 of 171
Moab City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: August 8, 2017
#: 9-2
Pl-17-113
Title: Consideration to Adopt Ordinance #2017-28, to Amend Section 17.09.560, Accessory
use or structure, Subsection “A” of the Moab Municipal Code to Modify Lot Coverage
for All Buildings on a Lot and Clarifying Regulations Concerning Accessory
Structures as Favorably Referred to City Council by the Planning Commission
Date Submitted: August 1, 2017
Staff Presenter: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner
Attachment(s): Draft Ordinance #2017-28 with markups
Draft Ordinance #2017-28 without markups
Options: Approve, deny, or modify.
Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance #2017-28 amend chapter 17.09.060A
of the Moab Municipal Code by revising yard setbacks, maximum lot coverage, and some
building heights in the schedule of residential area regulations, to correct the designation
of which text should control, and to delete additional provisions.
Background/Summary:
This ordinance amends MMC Section 17.09.560, Accessory Use or Structure, to:
Change the lot coverage for all buildings on a lot to a consistent 75%;
Removes the reference to a conditional use permit for structures that exceed the
accessory structure dimensional requirements;
Clarifies the heights of accessory structures and the requirement for obtaining
building permits;
Page 155 of 171
ORDINANCE #2017-28
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.09.560.A. BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM
LOT COVERAGE FOR ALL BUILDINGS ON A LOT, IN THE CHAPTER REGARDING
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
WHEREAS, the Moab City Council (“Council”) adopted the Moab Municipal Code (“Code”) and
especially Title 17, also known as “The Zoning Ordinance of Moab City, Utah” in an effort to encourage
and facilitate orderly growth and development in the City as well as to promote a more attractive and
wholesome community environment; and,
WHEREAS, from time to time Council has found it necessary to amend Title 17 to better enable public
compliance with and the City’s enforcement of the provisions of the land use ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, the City advised that allowing accessory structures to cover only twenty-five percent of the
rear or side yard was too strict a restraint on property owners, and limited their ability to develop their
property; and,
WHEREAS, the City appraised the amount of lot coverage allowed for accessory structures, found in
Section 17.09.560A, and determined that increasing that amount of lot coverage would promote a more fair
and accessible use of our land use code; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that the language in A.6.b. of this Section was awkward and somewhat
confusing, and is easily remedied; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that the language in Section A.7. was problematic, in that a conditional
use permit is not an appropriate venue for a citizen who wishes to build an accessory structure that exceeds
the dimensional requirements, and in any case, the City did not want the Code to appear to be encouraging
individuals to seek conditional use permits; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that Section 17.09.560.A.8. is already outlined in Section A.5., and was
therefore unnecessary: and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to remove parts of another Section of the Code, Section 17.09.680 (Carports
in side setbacks), pursuant to a separate Ordinance submitted simultaneously with Ordinance #2017-20, and
therefore the City needed to move the desired portions of Section 17.09.680 (relating to site plans and a
building permit) to Section 17.09.560; and,
WHEREAS, the amendments would be useful in aiding the Planning Staff in the day to day
administration of the Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Moab City Planning Commission (“Commission”) held a duly advertised public hearing
on June 22, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of said amendments; and,
WHEREAS, the Commission, after reviewing the public testimony and the recommendation of Staff,
determined that these amendments would provide more clarity in the code, and would also facilitate fair
and orderly building in the City, and subsequently adopted Planning Resolution 2017-32, that favorably
recommended Ordinance #2017-28 to the City Council for approval; and,
WHEREAS, Council reviewed Ordinance #2017-28 in a regularly scheduled meeting held on
_______ __, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of the proposed changes to Section 17.09.560.A.; and,
Page 156 of 171
WHEREAS, Council found the changes to be in the best interests of the City of Moab.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Moab City Council hereby amends the language of Section 17.09.560.A., as it
currently reads to be revised by the changes below:
Items in yellow shall be deleted from the code. Items in blue shall be added to the code:
17.09.560 Accessory use or structure, that now reads:
A. Accessory uses or structures as defined in Section 17.06.020 may be permitted subject to the
following conditions:
1. Such accessory uses shall be limited to those customarily associated with and appropriate,
incidental and subordinate to the principal use.
2. Such accessory uses shall be located on the same lot or tract as the associated principal use.
3. Detached garages and attached carports located in the front yard setback, shall be controlled in
the same manner as the associated principal use, except as otherwise expressly provided in this code.
Carports located in the rear one-half of the building lot and all non-garage accessory structures shall
be required to have a minimum 2:12 roof pitch.
4. Such accessory uses shall not be located on the lot so that storm water drainage is allowed to
drain directly onto neighboring private property or public property including easements, alleys, and
rights-of-way.
5. In no event shall an accessory use be construed to authorize a use not otherwise permitted in the
zone district in which the principal use is located, and in no event shall an accessory use or structure
be established prior to the principal use or structure to which it is accessory.
6. Dimensional requirements for accessory structures in the RA-1, A-2, C-1, C-2, C-4, C-5, R-1, R-
2, R-3, R-4, and MH/RV-1 zone districts:
a. In no case shall a single accessory structure or in the case of multiple structures, shall an area
in excess of twenty-five percent of any rear [or side] yard of a principal structure be utilized.
a. The maximum height of accessory structures shall not exceed twenty feet or the height of the
principal structure, whichever is less; provided, however, that carports may not exceed a height of
sixteen feet or be equal to the height of a single story principal structure if located in the front
yard and attached to the principal residential structure.
7. Accessory structures exceeding the dimensional requirements listed in subsection (A)(6) of this
section may be approved through a conditional use permit as established in Section 17.09.530
8. In no case shall an accessory structure or use be constructed or established prior to the principal
use.
Page 157 of 171
Shall be amended to read:
7. In no event shall an accessory use be construed to authorize a use not otherwise permitted in the
zone district in which the principal use is located, and in no event shall an accessory use or structure
be constructed or established prior to the principal use or structure to which it is accessory.
8. Dimensional requirements for accessory structures in the RA-1, A-2, C-1, C-2, C-4, C-5, R-1, R-
2, R-3, R-4, and MH/RV-1 zone districts:
a. The combined total area of all primary, secondary, and accessory buildings on a lot may
cover not more than seventy-five percent of the lot area.
b. The maximum height of accessory structures shall not exceed twenty feet or the height of
the principal structure, whichever is less; provided, however, that carports may not exceed a
height of sixteen feet, and must be less than or equal to the height of a single story principal
structure if located in the front yard and attached to the principal residential structure.
9. Individuals who desire to construct accessory buildings and carports are required to obtain a
building permit and to submit site plans that accurately describe the dimensions of the proposed
structure and the required setbacks.
In effect on the day of passage;
PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City
Council on the ___ day of _______, 2017.
SIGNED:
David L. Sakrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rachel Stenta, Recorder
Page 158 of 171
ORDINANCE #2017-28
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.09.560.A. BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM
LOT COVERAGE FOR ALL BUILDINGS ON A LOT, IN THE CHAPTER REGARDING
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
WHEREAS, the Moab City Council (“Council”) adopted the Moab Municipal Code (“Code”) and
especially Title 17, also known as “The Zoning Ordinance of Moab City, Utah” in an effort to encourage
and facilitate orderly growth and development in the City as well as to promote a more attractive and
wholesome community environment; and,
WHEREAS, from time to time Council has found it necessary to amend Title 17 to better enable public
compliance with and the City’s enforcement of the provisions of the land use ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, the City advised that allowing accessory structures to cover only twenty-five percent of the
rear or side yard was too strict a restraint on property owners, and limited their ability to develop their
property; and,
WHEREAS, the City appraised the amount of lot coverage allowed for accessory structures, found in
Section 17.09.560A, and determined that increasing that amount of lot coverage would promote a more fair
and accessible use of our land use code; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that the language in A.6.b. of this Section was awkward and somewhat
confusing, and is easily remedied; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that the language in Section A.7. was problematic, in that a conditional
use permit is not an appropriate venue for a citizen who wishes to build an accessory structure that exceeds
the dimensional requirements, and in any case, the City did not want the Code to appear to be encouraging
individuals to seek conditional use permits; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that Section 17.09.560.A.8. is already outlined in Section A.5., and was
therefore unnecessary: and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to remove parts of another Section of the Code, Section 17.09.680 (Carports
in side setbacks), pursuant to a separate Ordinance submitted simultaneously with Ordinance #2017-20, and
therefore the City needed to move the desired portions of Section 17.09.680 (relating to site plans and a
building permit) to Section 17.09.560; and,
WHEREAS, the amendments would be useful in aiding the Planning Staff in the day to day
administration of the Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Moab City Planning Commission (“Commission”) held a duly advertised public hearing
on June 22, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of said amendments; and,
WHEREAS, the Commission, after reviewing the public testimony and the recommendation of Staff,
determined that these amendments would provide more clarity in the code, and would also facilitate fair
and orderly building in the City, and subsequently adopted Planning Resolution 2017-32, that favorably
recommended Ordinance #2017-28 to the City Council for approval; and,
WHEREAS, Council reviewed Ordinance #2017-28 in a regularly scheduled meeting held on
_______ __, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of the proposed changes to Section 17.09.560.A.; and,
Page 159 of 171
WHEREAS, Council found the changes to be in the best interests of the City of Moab.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Moab City Council hereby amends the language of Section 17.09.560.A., as it
currently reads to be revised by the changes below:
17.09.560 Accessory use or structure, that now reads:
A. Accessory uses or structures as defined in Section 17.06.020 may be permitted subject to the
following conditions:
1. Such accessory uses shall be limited to those customarily associated with and appropriate,
incidental and subordinate to the principal use.
2. Such accessory uses shall be located on the same lot or tract as the associated principal use.
3. Detached garages and attached carports located in the front yard setback, shall be controlled in
the same manner as the associated principal use, except as otherwise expressly provided in this code.
Carports located in the rear one-half of the building lot and all non-garage accessory structures shall
be required to have a minimum 2:12 roof pitch.
4. Such accessory uses shall not be located on the lot so that storm water drainage is allowed to
drain directly onto neighboring private property or public property including easements, alleys, and
rights-of-way.
5. In no event shall an accessory use be construed to authorize a use not otherwise permitted in the
zone district in which the principal use is located, and in no event shall an accessory use or structure
be established prior to the principal use or structure to which it is accessory.
6. Dimensional requirements for accessory structures in the RA-1, A-2, C-1, C-2, C-4, C-5, R-1, R-
2, R-3, R-4, and MH/RV-1 zone districts:
a. In no case shall a single accessory structure or in the case of multiple structures, shall an area
in excess of twenty-five percent of any rear [or side] yard of a principal structure be utilized.
a. The maximum height of accessory structures shall not exceed twenty feet or the height of the
principal structure, whichever is less; provided, however, that carports may not exceed a height of
sixteen feet or be equal to the height of a single story principal structure if located in the front
yard and attached to the principal residential structure.
7. Accessory structures exceeding the dimensional requirements listed in subsection (A)(6) of this
section may be approved through a conditional use permit as established in Section 17.09.530
8. In no case shall an accessory structure or use be constructed or established prior to the principal
use.
Shall be amended to read:
7. In no event shall an accessory use be construed to authorize a use not otherwise permitted in the
zone district in which the principal use is located, and in no event shall an accessory use or structure
be constructed or established prior to the principal use or structure to which it is accessory.
Page 160 of 171
8. Dimensional requirements for accessory structures in the RA-1, A-2, C-1, C-2, C-4, C-5, R-1, R-
2, R-3, R-4, and MH/RV-1 zone districts:
a. The combined total area of all primary, secondary, and accessory buildings on a lot may
cover not more than seventy-five percent of the lot area.
b. The maximum height of accessory structures shall not exceed twenty feet or the height of
the principal structure, whichever is less; provided, however, that carports may not exceed a
height of sixteen feet, and must be less than or equal to the height of a single story principal
structure if located in the front yard and attached to the principal residential structure.
9. Individuals who desire to construct accessory buildings and carports are required to obtain a
building permit and to submit site plans that accurately describe the dimensions of the proposed
structure and the required setbacks.
In effect on the day of passage;
PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City
Council on the ___ day of _______, 2017.
SIGNED:
David L. Sakrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rachel Stenta, Recorder
Page 161 of 171
Moab City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: August 8, 2017
#: 9-3
Pl-17-114
Title: Consideration to Adopt Ordinance #2017-29, to Amend Section 17.09.560,
Subsection “B”, Setbacks for accessory buildings, as Favorably Referred to City
Council by the Planning Commission
Date Submitted: August 1, 2017
Staff Presenter: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner
Attachment(s): Draft Ordinance #2017-29 with markups
Draft Ordinance #2017-29 without markups
Options: Approve, deny, or modify.
Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance #2017-29 amend chapter 17.09.060B
of the Moab Municipal Code by revising yard setbacks based on accessory building heights.
Background/Summary:
This ordinance amends MMC Section 17.09.560, B, Setbacks for accessory buildings, to:
Change the setbacks for accessory structures that are less than ten feet in height to
three feet;
Retains the existing setback of five feet for accessory structures that exceed ten feet
in height.
Page 162 of 171
ORDINANCE #2017-29
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.09.560.B.
BY DECREASING THE SETBACKS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES,
AND CLARIFYING WHAT IS CONSIDERED THE “PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE”
WHEREAS, the Moab City Council (“Council”) adopted the Moab Municipal Code (“Code”) and
especially Title 17, also known as “The Zoning Ordinance of Moab City, Utah” in an effort to encourage
and facilitate orderly growth and development in the City as well as to promote a more attractive and
wholesome community environment; and,
WHEREAS, the City appraised the requirements for accessory structure setbacks in the Table in
17.09.560.B; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that, in order to provide more accessibility to and greater options for
citizens to build on their private property, the accessory structure setbacks should be decreased; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that the Section needed some clarity regarding what is considered the
“principal structure” on a lot, in that the 12 foot constraint is creating confusion, provides no discernible
benefit, and has outlived its usefulness as a constraint; and,
WHEREAS, the amendments would be useful in aiding the public and the Planning Staff in the day to
day administration of the Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Moab City Planning Commission (“Commission”) held a duly advertised public hearing
on June 22, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of said amendments; and,
WHEREAS, the Commission, after reviewing the public testimony and the recommendation of Staff,
determined that these amendments would provide clarity in the code, and also facilitate fair and orderly
building in the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Commission, in a 3-0 vote, subsequently adopted Planning Resolution 2017-33, that
favorably recommended Ordinance #2017-29 to the City Council for approval; and,
WHEREAS, Council reviewed Ordinance #2017-29 in a regularly scheduled meeting held on
_______ __, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of the proposed changes to Section 17.09.560.B.; and,
WHEREAS, Council found the changes to be in the best interests of the City of Moab.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Moab City Council hereby amends the language of Section 17.09.560.B, as it
currently reads to be revised by the changes below:
Items in yellow shall be deleted from the code. Items in blue shall be added to the code:
17.09.560 Accessory use or structure
17.09.560.B Setbacks for accessory buildings
B. Setbacks. Detached accessory buildings shall be constructed to the established setbacks as illustrated
in the following table:
Page 163 of 171
Setbacks for Accessory Structures*
Detached accessory structures less than 10 feet in
height
Detached accessory structures more than 10 feet in
height
Attached accessory structures
Must meet the established setbacks for the principal
structure if located within 12 feet of the principal
structure.
Side yard More than 5 feet
3 feet for structures
up to 10 feet
5 feet for structures exceeding 10 feet
Rear yard More than 5 feet
3 feet for
structures up to 10
feet
5 feet for structures exceeding 10 feet
From other accessory
structures on the same
property
10 feet
3 feet for structures
up to 10 feet
5 feet for structures exceeding 10 feet
Corner Lot (side street) 10 feet
3 feet for structures
up to 10 feet
5 feet for structures exceeding 10 feet
* As measured from any side lot line, alley right-of-way or easement line.
In effect on the day of passage;
PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City
Council on the ___ day of _______, 2017.
SIGNED:
David L. Sakrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rachel Stenta, Recorder
Page 164 of 171
ORDINANCE #2017-29
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.09.560.B.
BY DECREASING THE SETBACKS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES,
AND CLARIFYING WHAT IS CONSIDERED THE “PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE”
WHEREAS, the Moab City Council (“Council”) adopted the Moab Municipal Code (“Code”) and
especially Title 17, also known as “The Zoning Ordinance of Moab City, Utah” in an effort to encourage
and facilitate orderly growth and development in the City as well as to promote a more attractive and
wholesome community environment; and,
WHEREAS, the City appraised the requirements for accessory structure setbacks in the Table in
17.09.560.B; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that, in order to provide more accessibility to and greater options for
citizens to build on their private property, the accessory structure setbacks should be decreased; and,
WHEREAS, the City determined that the Section needed some clarity regarding what is considered the
“principal structure” on a lot, in that the 12 foot constraint is creating confusion, provides no discernible
benefit, and has outlived its usefulness as a constraint; and,
WHEREAS, the amendments would be useful in aiding the public and the Planning Staff in the day to
day administration of the Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Moab City Planning Commission (“Commission”) held a duly advertised public hearing
on June 22, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of said amendments; and,
WHEREAS, the Commission, after reviewing the public testimony and the recommendation of Staff,
determined that these amendments would provide clarity in the code, and also facilitate fair and orderly
building in the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Commission, in a 3-0 vote, subsequently adopted Planning Resolution 2017-33, that
favorably recommended Ordinance #2017-29 to the City Council for approval; and,
WHEREAS, Council reviewed Ordinance #2017-29 in a regularly scheduled meeting held on
_______ __, 2017, to hear and decide the merits of the proposed changes to Section 17.09.560.B.; and,
WHEREAS, Council found the changes to be in the best interests of the City of Moab.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Moab City Council hereby amends the language of Section 17.09.560.B, as it
currently reads to be revised by the changes below:
Items in yellow shall be deleted from the code. Items in blue shall be added to the code:
17.09.560 Accessory use or structure
17.09.560.B Setbacks for accessory buildings
Page 165 of 171
B. Setbacks. Detached accessory buildings shall be constructed to the established setbacks as illustrated
in the following table:
Setbacks for Accessory Structures*
Detached accessory structures less than 10 feet in height Detached accessory structures more
than 10 feet in height
Side yard 3 feet for structures up
to 10 feet
5 feet for structures exceeding 10 feet
Rear yard 3 feet for structures up
to 10 feet
5 feet for structures exceeding 10 feet
From other accessory structures on
the same property
3 feet for structures up
to 10 feet
5 feet for structures exceeding 10 feet
Corner Lot (side street) 3 feet for structures up
to 10 feet
5 feet for structures exceeding 10 feet
* As measured from any side lot line, alley right-of-way or easement line.
In effect upon passage;
PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City
Council on the ___ day of _______, 2017.
SIGNED:
David L. Sakrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rachel Stenta, Recorder
Page 166 of 171
AGENDA SUMMARY
MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August, 8 2017
Agenda Item
#: 9-4
Title: Approval of Task Order with Bowen Collins for Work on Bridge project at
200 South, Bullick/Cross Creeks Park
Fiscal Impact: $4,100
Staff Presenter(s): Tif Miller, Parks Recreation and Trails Director
Department: Recreation
Applicant: n/a
Background/Summary: The design for the bridge off of 200 South at Bullick/
Cross Creeks Park has been ongoing for the past few months. This task order
will help for design to locate the bridge into the best location and the bridge we
feel would be the best fit for the location. The cost for this task order includes
environmental permitting assistance and a bridge design update. This bridge
has been out for a while, and our hope is that we can provide a structure that will
last and provide access to our trails.
Options: Council can approve, table, or deny the proposed task order.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approving the Task Order with
Bowen Collins for Work on the Bridge project at 200 South, Bullick/Cross Creeks
Park
Recommended Motion: I move to approve the Task Order with Bowen Collins
for Work on the Bridget project at 200 South, Bullick/Cross Creeks Park
Attachment(s): Task Order/Additional Services 200 South Project
Page 167 of 171
December 20, 2016 Tiff Miller Director of Parks, Recreation, and Trails 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532
Subject: Additional Services Request for the Moab City 200 South Pedestrian Bridge Project
Dear Tif:
Bowen Collins and Associates (BC&A) was retained by Moab City to design and permit a new pedestrian bridge at approximately 150 West Street. This project is currently 90-percent complete. It is our understanding that the City desires an additional pedestrian bridge at approximately 200 South on Pack Creek and requested that the design and permitting of this new pedestrian bridge be amended to the 150 West Pedestrian Bridge Project. In accordance with your request, (BC&A) has prepared this proposed scope of services to including the design and permitting of this additional Pedestrian Bridge as part of the 150 West Pedestrian Bridge Project. It is also understood that the City wants BC&A to develop a performance specification to be included in the contract document for general contractor procurement of both the 150 West and 200 South pedestrian bridges associated with the project. The work associated with designing and permitting the additional bridge at 200 South will include the following:
• Prepare additional design drawings, including civil and bridge foundation design for the new pedestrian bridge at 200 South to be included with the 150 West drawings. Modify the current contract documents to include information regarding this new bridge.
• Prepare an application and obtain a State of Utah Stream Alteration Permit for the project. It is understood that Moab City will pay the processing fee for this permit. Based on our understanding of the project, we propose to complete the following scope of services.
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1: Coordination/Progress Meetings. BC&A staff will prepare for up to three (3) coordination/progress meetings. We have assumed that these meetings will take place via conference call and for budgetary purposes will last up to 2 hours each. Information regarding the project and available data obtained during design will be reviewed with the City during these meetings. We have also assumed that one of the meetings will be held to receive review comments on the design drawings and contract documents. Also as part of this task, BC&A will complete a field reconnaissance of the project site to verify details needed during the hydraulic modeling and final design tasks.
Page 168 of 171
Task 2: Field Survey. Existing digital aerial photography obtained from the City will be used for the base mapping of the project. To supplement the information on the digital photographs, a detailed field survey will be completed within the 200 South project area. The field survey will locate major surface features, known utility locations, and will collect topographic information. Temporary benchmarks will be established for reference and used during construction. It is our understanding that the project is located on City owned property and the no easements will be required.
Task 3: State of Utah Stream Alteration Permit. BC&A staff will prepare an application for a State of Utah Stream Alteration permit for Moab City to sign and submit. Also as part of this task, we will respond to any questions from the State regarding this application.
Task 4: Hydraulic Modeling. BC&A will use the FEMA effective hydraulic model to analyze the effects of the proposed pedestrian bridge on the floodplain. As part of this task, BC&A will provide a “Certificate of No Rise” to document the hydraulics of the project for the City’s file and FEMA compliance.
Task 5: Final Design. BC&A staff will prepare final design drawings and technical specifications for the combined 150 West and 200 South Pedestrian Bridge Projects. We will use Moab City’s current general conditions, bidding, and contract legal documents or EJCDC standard boiler plate contract documents. We also propose to use BC&A’s standard drawings, details, and technical specifications. We anticipate preparing 3 additional drawings, as defined below.
Sheet No. Drawings
C-4 200 South Pedestrian Bridge Plan and Profile
C-5 200 South Pedestrian Bridge Cross Section
S-1 Bridge Abutment Plan and Section
Task 6: Contract Documents. BC&A staff will prepare electronic bidding/contract documents (pdf format) for the 90-percent design submittals, including drawings and specifications for review. A performance specification for the bridges will also be included. After receiving review comments, we will prepare electronic bidding/contract documents for the City’s use in bidding.
Task 7: Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. BC&A staff will prepare an opinion of probable construction cost for the project.
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE AND BUDGETARY ASSUMPTIONS We propose to complete this project within 6 weeks of receiving Notice to Proceed. For budgetary purposes, the following assumptions were made in developing the fee estimate for this project: 1. Application and processing fees for the Stream Alteration Permit will be paid by the City. 2. No legal descriptions will be required with the project. 3. No FEMA floodplain mapping revisions will be provided. 4. No bid or construction period services will be provided as part of this project.
Page 169 of 171
COST SUMMARY We have tabulated estimated man-hours and costs to complete each task outlined in the previously defined scope of services. As presented in the attached Table, we respectfully request that you amend our previous contract to include an additional fee of $18,850 for the 200 South Project. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this additional services request and look forward to working with you on the project. We are willing to negotiate the scope of work, schedule, and fee, if there is something in this proposal that does not meet your needs. Please call if you have any questions or if you need additional information. Sincerely, Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc.
Craig Bagley, P.E., CFM Principal Attachment
Page 170 of 171
Table 1
Moab City
200 South Pedestrian Bridge Project
Engineering Man-hours and Fee Estimate 12/20/2016
Computer
Labor Category Account Editor E3 Enviro.PE Struct.Principal 7.00$
Staff KB Hilbert Moultrie Tsandes Olsen Davis C. Bagley
Task Task Description
1 Coordination/Progress Meetings 1 8 9 1,416$ 63$ 63$ 1,479$
2 Field Survey 4 4 560$ 728$ 28$ 1,288$
3 State of Utah Stream Alteration Permit 10 1 11 1,340$ 77$ 77$ 1,417$
4 Hydraulic Modeling 14 6 2 22 2,720$ 173$ 154$ 2,893$
5 Final Design 1 36 8 8 4 57 7,096$ 399$ 399$ 7,495$
6 Contract Documents 2 4 8 5 5 2 26 3,100$ 182$ 182$ 3,282$
7 Opinion of Preliminary Construction Cost 6 2 8 940$ 56$ 56$ 996$
TOTAL 4 4 64 10 26 13 16 137 17,172$ 1,678$ 959$ 18,850$
$224 $268 $7,040 $1,200 $3,640 $2,080 $2,720
Expenses include:
Computer/Communications Charge at $7/labor hour
Mileage Charge at $0.75/mile
10% Markup on other project related expenses
Total CostEngineers
Subtotal
Hours
Subtotal
Labor
Subtotal
Expenses
Expenses
Page 171 of 171