HomeMy Public PortalAbout04-25-22 Agenda Work Session101 E. Orange St., PO Box 429, Hillsborough, NC 27278
919-732-1270 | www.hillsboroughnc.gov | @HillsboroughGov
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA | 1 of 1
Agenda
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Work session
7 p.m. April 25, 2022
Board Meeting Room of Town Hall Annex, 105 E. Corbin St.
Please use the bookmark feature to navigate and view the item attachments.
1.Opening of the work session
2.Agenda changes and approval
3.Items for decision ― consent agenda
A.Miscellaneous budget amendments and transfers
B.Classification and pay amendment: reclassify lead customer service representative to customer service
representative
4.In-depth discussion and topics
A.Resolution to authorize water and sewer grant applications and a 15-year Utilities Capital Improvement
Project Plan
B.Draft Affordable Housing Guiding Principles
C.Mayor’s Task Force on Re-imagining Public Safety (continued discussion)
5.Other business
6.Committee updates and reports
7.Closed session
Closed session as authorized by North Carolina General Statute Section 143-318.11(a)(3) to consult with the
town attorney in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege (potential litigation)
8.Adjournment
Interpreter services or special sound equipment for compliance with the American with Disabilities Act is available
on request. If you are disabled and need assistance with reasonable accommodations, call the Town Clerk’s Office
at 919-296-9443 a minimum of one business day in advance of the meeting.
AGENDA ABSTRACT | 1 of 1
Agenda Abstract
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Meeting date: April 25, 2022
Department: Administrative
Services
Public hearing: No
Date of public hearing: N/A
PRESENTER/INFORMATION CONTACT
Emily Bradford, Budget Director
ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED
Subject: Miscellaneous budget amendments and transfers
Attachments:
Budget Changes Detail Report
Brief summary:
To adjust budgeted revenues and expenditures, where needed, due to changes that have occurred since budget
adoption.
Action requested:
Consider approving budget amendments and transfers.
ISSUE OVERVIEW
Background information and issue summary:
N/A
Financial impacts:
As indicated by each budget amendment.
Staff recommendation and comments:
To approve the attached list of budget amendments.
For clerk’s use
AGENDA ITEM:
3.A
Consent
agenda
Regular
agenda
Closed
session
BUDGET CHANGES REPORT
TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH
FY 2021-2022
DATES: 04/25/2022 TO 04/25/2022
REFERENCE NUMBER DATE BUDGET CHANGE BUDGET
ORIGINAL BUDGET AMENDEDCHANGE
USER
10-00-9990-5300-000 CONTINGENCY
04/25/2022 400,000.00 -5,500.00To cover legal services 24338 120,934.00EBRADFORD
04/25/2022 400,000.00 -2,800.00To cover tax collection expense 24342 118,134.00EBRADFORD
10-10-4100-5300-041 ATTORNEY FEES
04/25/2022 125,000.00 5,500.00To cover legal services 24337 142,599.00EBRADFORD
10-10-4200-5300-530 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
04/25/2022 7,184.00 400.00To cover Catapult dues 24343 8,584.00EBRADFORD
10-10-4200-5300-570 MISCELLANEOUS
04/25/2022 40,448.00 -400.00To cover Catapult dues 24344 59,284.00EBRADFORD
10-10-4400-5300-487 TAX COLLECTION
04/25/2022 39,000.00 2,800.00To cover tax collection expense 24341 41,800.00EBRADFORD
30-80-7220-5300-455 C.S./ENGINEERING
04/25/2022 27,500.00 49,000.0024340 178,620.00JFernandez
30-80-9990-5300-000 CONTINGENCY
04/25/2022 400,000.00 -49,000.0024339 55,933.00JFernandez
0.00
EBRADFORD 2:09:21PM04/18/2022
fl142r03
Page 1 of 1
GF-
Contingency
Governing
Body
Admin.
Admin.
Accounting
Utilities
Admin.
W&S-
Contingency
To cover grant related engineering service
To cover grant related engineering service
AGENDA ABSTRACT | 1 of 1
Agenda Abstract
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Meeting date: April 25, 2022
Department: Administrative
Services
Public hearing: No
Date of public hearing: N/A
PRESENTER/INFORMATION CONTACT
Human Resources Manager Haley Bizzell
ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED
Subject: Classification and pay amendment – reclassify lead customer service representative to customer service
representative
Attachments:
Pay schedule
Brief summary:
After the reclassification of the billing specialist to billing and customer service supervisor, it was found that the
Financial Services Department no longer has a need for the lead customer service representative classification. The
lead customer service representative is currently in grade 2 with a salary range of $34,769-$54,431. The
reclassification of this position to customer service representative would bring the position to grade 1 with a salary
range of $33,209-$51,934.
Action requested:
Approve the reclassification of lead customer service representative to customer service representative. Approve
updated pay schedule.
ISSUE OVERVIEW
Background information and issue summary:
Same as above.
Financial impacts:
No significant financial impacts – a decrease in the salary range.
Staff recommendation and comments:
Approve reclassification of lead customer service representative to customer service representative and updated
pay schedule.
For clerk’s use
AGENDA ITEM:
3.B
Consent
agenda
Regular
agenda
Closed
session
Salary
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
FLSA
Status
Class
Code Classification
1 33,209 42,571 51,934 N 0100 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE
1 33,209 42,571 51,934 N 0101 METER SERVICES TECHNICIAN
1 33,209 42,571 51,934 N 0102 UTILITY MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN I
2 34,769 44,600 54,431 N 0204 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TECHNICIAN
2 34,769 44,600 54,431 N 0205 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SPECIALIST
2 34,769 44,600 54,431 N 0206 EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I
2 34,769 44,600 54,431 N 0207 UTILITY MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN II
2 34,769 44,600 54,431 N 0208 LEAD CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE
3 36,408 46,730 57,052 N 0304 EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II
3 36,408 46,730 57,052 N 0305 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SPECIALIST
3 36,408 46,730 57,052 N 0307 UTILITY MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN III
3 36,408 46,730 57,052 N 0308 WASTEWATER PLANT OPERATOR I
3 36,408 46,730 57,052 N 0309 WATER PLANT OPERATOR I
4 38,128 48,967 59,805 N 0403 CREW LEADER/EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III
4 38,128 48,967 59,805 N 0405 PLANNING TECHNICIAN
4 38,128 48,967 59,805 N 0406 UTILITY SYSTEMS MECHANIC I
4 38,128 48,967 59,805 N 0407 WASTEWATER PLANT OPERATOR II
4 38,128 48,967 59,805 N 0408 WATER PLANT OPERATOR II
4 38,128 48,967 59,805 N 0409 PLANT MAINTENANCE MECHANIC I
4 38,128 48,967 59,805 N 0410 PLANT MECHANIC
5 39,934 51,315 62,695 N 0507 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
5 39,934 51,315 62,695 N 0509 UTILITY SYSTEMS MECHANIC II
5 39,934 51,315 62,695 N 0510 PLANT MAINTENANCE MECHANIC II
6 41,831 53,781 65,730 N 0608 LABORATORY TECHNICIAN/WATER PLANT OPERATOR III
6 41,831 53,781 65,730 N 0609 UTILITY SYSTEMS MECHANIC III
6 41,831 53,781 65,730 N 0610 WASTEWATER LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
6 41,831 53,781 65,730 N 0611 WASTEWATER PLANT OPERATOR III
6 41,831 53,781 65,730 N 0612 WATER PLANT OPERATOR III
6 41,831 53,781 65,730 N 0613 PLANT MAINTENANCE MECHANIC III
7 43,823 56,370 68,916 N 0708 BACKFLOW/FOG SPECIALIST
7 43,823 56,370 68,916 N 0711 FLEET MECHANIC
7 43,823 56,370 68,916 N 0712 OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
8 45,914 59,088 72,262 N 0804 METER SERVICES SUPERVISOR
8 45,914 59,088 72,262 N 0806 COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST
8 45,914 59,088 72,262 N 0807 STORMWATER PROGRAM COORDINATOR
8 45,914 59,088 72,262 E 0808 BILLING & CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR
9 48,110 61,942 75,775 N 0908 CHIEF WASTEWATER PLANT OPERATOR
9 48,110 61,942 75,775 E 0910 FINANCIAL ANALYST
9 48,110 61,942 75,775 E 0911 MANAGEMENT ANALYST
9 48,110 61,942 75,775 E 0912 PLANNER
9 48,110 61,942 75,775 N 0913 UTILITIES INSPECTOR
10 50,415 64,940 79,464 E 1013 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST
10 50,415 64,940 79,464 E 1016 WEB DEVELOPER/ASSISTANT COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER
10 50,415 64,940 79,464 N 1020 FACILITIES COORDINATOR
11 52,836 68,087 83,337 E 1107 UTILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR
11 52,836 68,087 83,337 E 1108 UTILITY SYSTEM SUPERVISOR
11 52,836 68,087 83,337 E 1109 BUDGET & MANAGEMENT ANALYST
Regular (Non‐Law Enforcement) Positions
12 55,378 71,391 87,404 E 1211 FLEET MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR
12 55,378 71,391 87,404 E 1213 SENIOR PLANNER
13 58,047 74,860 91,674 E 1301 TOWN CLERK/HR TECH
13 58,047 74,860 91,674 N 1302 CIVIL ENGINEERING TECHNICAN
14 60,849 78,504 96,158 E 1407 SAFETY & RISK MANAGER
15 63,791 82,329 100,866 E 1507 UTILITY SYSTEM SUPERINTENDENT
15 63,791 82,329 100,866 E 1508 WASTEWATER PLANT SUPERINTENDENT
15 63,791 82,329 100,866 E 1509 WATER PLANT SUPERINTENDENT
16 66,881 86,345 105,809
17 70,125 90,562 111,000 E 1701 COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER
17 70,125 90,562 111,000 E 1702 PUBLIC SPACES & SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER
17 70,125 90,562 111,000 E 1703 PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER
17 70,125 90,562 111,000 E 1704 HR MANAGER
17 70,125 90,562 111,000 E 1705 STORMWATER & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MANAGER
17 70,125 90,562 111,000 E 1706 IT MANAGER
17 70,125 90,562 111,000 E 1707 ENGINEERING MANAGER
17 70,125 90,562 111,000 E 1708 ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR
18 73,531 94,990 116,450 E 1801 PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
19 77,108 99,640 122,172
20 80,863 104,522 128,181 E 2002 BUDGET DIRECTOR
21 84,806 109,648 134,490
22 88,947 115,031 141,114 E 2201 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
23 93,294 120,682 148,070 E 2301 FINANCE DIRECTOR
23 93,294 120,682 148,070 E 2302 UTILITIES DIRECTOR
24 97,859 126,616 155,374 E 2400 ASSISTANT TOWN MANAGER/COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
Salary
Grade Minimum Midpoint Maximum
FLSA
Status
Class
Code Classification
P1 48,000 61,174 74,348 N P101 POLICE OFFICER/POLICE OFFICER FIRST CLASS
P2 50,196 64,028 77,861 N P201 SENIOR POLICE OFFICER
P3 52,501 67,026 81,550 N P301 POLICE CORPORAL
P3 52,501 67,026 81,550 N P302 MASTER POLICE OFFICER
P4 57,464 73,477 89,490 N P401 POLICE SERGEANT
P5 62,935 80,590 98,244 E P501 POLICE LIEUTENANT
P6 95,380 122,768 150,156 E P601 CHIEF OF POLICE
Sworn Law Enforcement Officer Positions
AGENDA ABSTRACT | 1 of 1
Agenda Abstract
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Meeting date: April 25, 2022
Department: Utilities
Public hearing: No
Date of public hearing: N/A
PRESENTER/INFORMATION CONTACT
Utilities Director K. Marie Strandwitz, PE
ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED
Subject: Resolution to authorize water and sewer grant applications and a 15-year Utilities Capital Improvement
Project Plan
Attachments:
1. Resolution to authorize applications and approve Capital Improvement Project Plan
2. A 15-year Utilities Capital Improvement Project Plan
Brief summary:
The Spring 2022 round of grant and loan funding opportunities is currently open. May 2 is the deadline to submit
state applications for qualified water and sewer projects. This resolution authorizes the town to apply for several
projects in its continued efforts to find grant and low to no interest loan opportunities for the utilities needs.
Action requested:
Adopt on resolution.
ISSUE OVERVIEW
Background information and issue summary:
As above and stated within the resolution language, the Town of Hillsborough has need for and intends to study,
perform asset or inventory management activities, or design and construct a wastewater treatment works,
wastewater collection system, drinking water treatment works, and/or drinking water distribution system for
projects described as 1) River Pumping Station Relocation Project, 2) Eno River Collection System Interceptors, 3)
Distribution System Master Planning, 4) Preliminary Study of Hasell Street Water Tank and US 70A Water Main, 5)
OWASA Water Booster Pumping Station (for OWASA Interconnect), 6) Wastewater System Master
Planning/Optimization, and 7) Lawndale Sewer Basin Rehabilitation.
Financial impacts:
Customer rates can remain more stable if awarded grant or low- to no-interest loan opportunities that the town
can accept within its fiscal responsibilities for the portions of or entire projects as presented above. No actual
figure can be determined at this moment.
Staff recommendation and comments:
The presented 15-year Capital Improvements Project Plan will not entirely align with the current budget numbers
as it is work in progress but the projects for which funding is being sought are listed amongst others.
For clerk’s use
AGENDA ITEM:
4.A
Consent
agenda
Regular
agenda
Closed
session
RESOLUTION
Authorization of applications for water and sewer grants or loans
and the 15-year Capital Improvement Plan
Spring 2022 Funding Round
WHEREAS, The Federal Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987 and the North Carolina the Water
Infrastructure Act of 2005 (NCGS 159G) have authorized the making of loans and grants to aid eligible units of
government in financing the study of, asset management or the cost of design and construction of wastewater
treatment works, wastewater collection systems, drinking water treatment works, and/or drinking water
distribution systems; and
WHEREAS, The Town of Hillsborough has need for and intends to study, perform asset or inventory
management activities, or design and construct a wastewater treatment works, wastewater collection system, drinking
water treatment works, and/or drinking water distribution system for projects described as 1) River Pumping Station
Relocation Project, 2) Eno River Collection System Interceptors, 3) Distribution System Master Planning, 4) Preliminary
Study of Hasell Street Water Tank and US 70A Water Main, 5) OWASA Water Booster Pumping Station (for OWASA
Interconnect), 6) Wastewater System Master Planning/Optimization, and 7) Lawndale Sewer Basin Rehabilitation; and
WHEREAS, The Town of Hillsborough intends to request state loan or grant assistance for the above projects
and hereby approves a 15-year Capital Improvement Plan related to such which will provide additional scoring points
to the town for asset management activities;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved the Hillsborough Board of Commissioners that the town of Hillsborough,
the Applicant, will arrange financing for all remaining costs of the project, if approved and accepting of a State or
Federal loan or grant award.
That the Applicant will adopt and place into effect on or before completion of the project a schedule of fees and
charges and other available funds which will provide adequate funds for proper operation, maintenance, and
administration of the system and the repayment of all principal and interest on the debt.
That the governing body of the Applicant agrees to include in the loan agreement a provision authorizing the
State Treasurer, upon failure of the Town of Hillsborough to make scheduled repayment of the loan, to withhold
from the Town of Hillsborough any State funds that would otherwise be distributed to the local government unit
in an amount sufficient to pay all sums then due and payable to the State as a repayment of the loan.
That the Applicant will provide for efficient operation and maintenance of the project on completion of
construction thereof.
That Eric J. Peterson, Town Manager, the Authorized Official, and successors so titled, is hereby authorized to
execute and file an application on behalf of the Applicant with the State of North Carolina for a loan or grant to
aid in the construction of the project described above.
That the Authorized Official, and successors so titled, is hereby authorized and directed to furnish such
information as the appropriate State agency may request in connection with such application or the project: to
make the assurances as contained above; and to execute such other documents as may be required in connection
with the application.
That the Applicant has substantially complied or will substantially comply with all Federal, State, and local laws,
rules, regulations, and ordinances applicable to the project and to Federal and State grants and loans pertaining
thereto.
Approved this 25th day of April 2022.
Jenn Weaver, Mayor
Town of Hillsborough
Attestation:
Sarah Kimrey, Town Clerk
Agenda Abstract
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Meeting date: April 25, 2022
Department: Town Board
Public hearing: No
Date of public hearing: N/A
PRESENTER/INFORMATION CONTACT
Commissioner Mark Bell
ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED
Subject: Draft Affordable Housing Guiding Principles
Attachments:
Draft Affordable Housing Guiding Principles
Brief summary:
Receive a report from Commissioner Bell regarding draft affordable housing guiding principles.
Action requested:
Receive report and discuss next steps.
ISSUE OVERVIEW
Background information and issue summary:
The Comprehensive Sustainability Plan is in development and will include detailed information about the town’s
vision for housing in Hillsborough, including affordable housing. So far this year, multiple development proposals
that include a substantial number of residential units have been brought to the attention of the board. The board
would like to articulate guiding principles around affordable housing to help focus our efforts and provide
developers and stakeholders a concise statement of the board’s intent while we await the Comprehensive
Sustainability Plan later this year. This draft list of guiding principles was compiled following individual interviews
with the mayor and board to further this effort.
Financial impacts:
None.
Staff recommendation and comments:
At the April regular meeting, Commissioner Bell indicated that the Community Home Trust needed to know the
town’s priorities or policies related to affordable housing to guide their discussions with applicant developers.
The attached list is Commissioner Bell’s work following discussions with board members. Staff will be preparing
guidelines for how any local funds designated for this purpose may be spent and investigating what steps and
guidance are needed to move away from a case-by-case discussion of expectations for applicant housing
developers. In staff’s opinion, the attached list should be viewed as a stop-gap document to fill in until the
Comprehensive Sustainability Plan and staff work is completed. This work should be complete in coming months
and certainly prior to the end of the calendar year.
For clerk’s use
AGENDA ITEM:
4.B
Consent
agenda
Regular
agenda
Closed
session
Draft Guiding Principles for Affordable Housing
1.Pause approval of new residential developments until adoption of affordable housing guiding principles that
will ultimately be synthesized with the Comprehensive Sustainability Plan later this year
2.Establish a affordable housing fund and begin contributing to it in the upcoming FY, ramping up to 2% of
general fund over 3-5 years; funds will be used for all aspects of our housing efforts
3.Prioritize surplus town-owned land for potential affordable housing
4.Dedicate at least 1/3 of remaining buildable train station land to future affordable housing in partnership
with a trusted entity; the town is not likely to build, own, or manage the housing ourselves
5.Increase funding of programs to help residents stay in their homes by supporting repairs and efficiency
improvements; help residents navigate other agencies and organizations that provide similar services
6.Require 15% affordable housing units in new residential developments, more if a property is zoned other
than residential, but also have flexibility to achieve overall goals of the town
7.Develop a diverse portfolio of affordable housing for various income levels and priority populations, such as
disabled individuals, senior citizens, veterans, and middle-income residents; strive for an appropriate mix of
ownership and rental units
8.Add inclusionary zoning to the UDO, if necessary, to require developers to adhere to our affordable housing
requirements
9.Consider affordable housing payment in lieu only for smaller developments and dedicate these funds to the
new affordable housing fund
10.Target real permanence for housing units, not short term such as 30 years
11.Avoid approval of development on parcels that will place a burden on residents or funders of affordable
housing because of issues such as siting, topography, above-average construction costs, and restrictions by
funders or regulators
12.Include consideration of connectivity and access to public transportation when reviewing proposals for
affordable housing development
13.Strive for new affordable housing that is appealing and meaningfully integrated into larger developments
14.Develop a dashboard for the town website that tracks affordable housing progress, highlights challenges and
successes, and is reviewed quarterly
15.Identify a town staff member to run point on affordable housing, including to work with developers,
maintain an inventory of units, identify relevant resources, and collaborate with stakeholders and peer
municipalities to learn about best practices and funding opportunities
AGENDA ABSTRACT | 1 of 1
Agenda Abstract
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Meeting date: April 25, 2022
Department: Police
Public hearing: No
Date of public hearing: N/A
PRESENTER/INFORMATION CONTACT
Chief Duane Hampton
ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED
Subject: Recommendations from Mayor’s Task Force on Re-imagining Public Safety (continued)
Attachments:
1.Mayor’s Task Force on Reimagining Public Safety Recommendations
2.Chief Hampton’s Response
Brief summary:
Continued discussion from the March 14 regular meeting of the Mayor’s Task Force recommendations. The board
discussed the recommendations related to use of force. Remaining to be discussed are recommendations related
to procedures and the topic of an advisory board.
Action requested:
Discuss recommendations and provide guidance.
ISSUE OVERVIEW
Background information and issue summary:
This is a continuation of the initial board discussion of the Task Force recommendations and the response from
HPD to those recommendations.
Financial impacts:
None.
Staff recommendation and comments:
None.
For clerk’s use
AGENDA ITEM:
4.C
Consent
agenda
Regular
agenda
Closed
session
101 E. Orange St., Hillsborough, NC 27278
919-732-1270 | www.hillsboroughnc.gov | @HillsboroughGov
October 25, 2021
Dear Commissioners, Mr. Peterson, Chief Hampton, and Mr. Hornick,
The Mayor’s Task Force on Re-Imagining Public Safety was established in November 2020. The task force
was charged to “Assess and determine a model for community safety review appropriate for the
Hillsborough community in terms of charge, appointment, and composition, within the confines of state
and local law.”
In June of 2020, the Board of Commissioners unanimously passed a resolution entitled “Resolution
Denouncing the Murder of George Floyd”. One of the actionable items in this resolution was a
commitment to establish a standing advisory board to consider issues of importance to the community
regarding policing. Upon reflection, and in consultation with the town manager, I felt it was important
that the form and substance of this advisory board be community driven, rather than a top-down
decision by elected officials and town staff. Ultimately, the decision of what any advisory board looks
like and how it operates is up to the board of commissioners but given the power differentials between
police, elected officials, and the public, having significant community input felt paramount.
In addition, the resolution asked the town manager and police chief to engage with the public regarding
concerns the community has regarding public safety and policing. That engagement has occurred in
various venues, and this the task force provided an opportunity to dive into some of these issues in
depth.
There were over thirty applications to the task force, demonstrating a high level of interest in this
initiative. A selection committee comprised of myself, Mayor Pro Tem Mark Bell, Fairview Community
Watch President Faylor Riley, and Planning Board member Lisa Frazier met to review the applications.
The selection committee settled on fifteen members for the task force, representing a full array of
Hillsborough neighborhoods, including several areas where the town typically struggles to manifest
participation in volunteer advisory boards.
Though task force members originally committed to four to six meetings, that estimation was well
exceeded. The task force met a total of ten times, beginning in December 2020 and ending in September
2021. Members also met separately in two smaller groups to discuss and draft recommendations based
on the content of task force meetings and community needs. Though not all task force appointees were
able to continue past the initial time commitment, every member made important contributions to this
effort. I am deeply grateful to the members, to Hillsborough Police Department Management Analyst Eli
Valsing for providing technical and other administrative support, and to Chief Hampton for his multiple
in-depth presentations, time, and attention to the task force.
The topics addressed by the task force were:
• Mental health calls: the nature and number of these calls, HPD response challenges
• Use of Force policy
Town of Hillsborough | 2
•General policies and practices of the Hillsborough Police Department
•Data showing activity and patterns in Hillsborough Police Department patrols
•Data showing racially disproportionate traffic stops, including a presentation by one of the
leading experts on this issue, Dr. Frank Baumgartner
•Policing Advisory Boards: models used by other jurisdictions, what does and does not work
about these models and why they are often unsatisfying for the public, innovative models to
better meet community needs and expectations.
In this packet, you will find recommendations on topical areas into which the task force delved,
including recommendations for a standing advisory board. In making these recommendations, I urged
the task force members to not be held back by questions regarding cost, legality, or capacity in order
that they might be expansive in their asks for what the community needs. Thus, these recommendations
need vetting by the town attorney. In addition, the town board, the town manager, and the police chief
have an important task before us, to take these recommendations and consider how we can implement
them in service to the public safety of our residents.
We are in a transformative time in the realm of racial justice and public safety. The call from our
community in the wake of the George Floyd uprising across the country was clear. The ball is in our
court now for how we will answer. I look forward to working together to implement policies and
practices for a more just and equitable Hillsborough that is safe for everyone. This will take time,
ingenuity, and strong communication with each other and with the community.
Sincerely,
Mayor Jenn Weaver
101 E. Orange St., Hillsborough, North Carolina
www.hillsboroughnc.gov | @HillsboroughGov
Mayor’s Task Force on Re-imaging Public Safety Members
Judit Alvarado
Keith Cook
Sujata Bijou
Shannon Blue
Patricia Harrison
Chloe Johnson
Rod Jones
Jason Knapp
Tracey Little
Hathaway Pendergrass
Hooper Schultz
Marc Xavier
Allison Zirkel
101 E. Orange St., Hillsborough, North Carolina
www.hillsboroughnc.gov | @HillsboroughGov
Draft Advisory Board Recommendations
Mayor’s Task Force on Re-Imagining Public Safety
October 25, 2021
Draft Advisory Board Recommendations | 2 of 2
There is strong support among task force members to create a standing advisory board to consider various
policing and public safety issues. The task force recognizes that there is disconnect between policing and
communities writ large across the country, and Hillsborough is not immune. Some communities want a
stronger police presence, whereas others feel over-policed. Struggles of addiction, poverty, etc. are not
being directly addressed but instead are handled by police in crisis situations, when police are called to
respond to situations that are outside their area of training or expertise. The task force sees a role for a
standing advisory board to be a means of accountability and to explore policy changes that can strengthen
the connection between the Hillsborough Police Department and the community that would be beneficial
to all parties. There are two general buckets of issues for an advisory board to consider. One, as a venue
outside of the police department to examine complaints, and two, as a venue to continue with the work of
re-imagining public safety and policy changes. Below is a list of recommendations falling loosely in both
areas. The task force understands that these recommendations for an advisory board may lie outside of
current legal parameters or may be beyond the current capacity of the town of Hillsborough, but
regardless, they reflect the needs of the community illuminated by the work of the task force over the past
10 months.
• We strongly recommend that a standing Advisory Board be convened, populated, and supported.
We imagine that a small number of dedicated citizens and community leaders would be ideal; five
members would allow for a diverse group of community members but would be small enough to
develop a close rapport among the members. “Diversity” to us means variety in ages, races,
ethnicity, races, experience, and perspective.
• We imagine that the Advisory Board would continue to conduct research into police practices and
continue to issue recommendations to the Town Board as necessary.
• Another, very important, function of the Advisory Board would be to review community complaints
regarding the use of force or about other police conduct. Many police review boards across the
country have failed, and many reports show this is due to inadequate authority or because of lack of
information. Policies should be adopted to avoid this outcome in Hillsborough.
• An advisory board should continue review of data regarding racial disparities in local policing (traffic
stop data show racial disparities and ideally these would be eliminated).
• Responses to addressing racial disparities are relatively new. An advisory board could pay attention
to innovations, assess whether any changes being made are forward thinking/effective.
• There is broad agreement among the task force and Hillsborough Police Department that the HPD
needs to be more racially/ethnically diverse. There could be a role for the advisory board here.
• A standing advisory board could be a place for considering additional policies to reimagine public
safety in Hillsborough, such as instituting alternatives to policing, educating the community about
wellness and mental health resources, violence prevention, community training to help
communities reduce violence without police intervention.
101 E. Orange St., Hillsborough, North Carolina
www.hillsboroughnc.gov | @HillsboroughGov
Draft Recommendations for the Hillsborough Police Department
Mayor’s Task Force on Re-imagining Public Safety
October 25, 2021
Draft Recommendations for the Hillsborough Police Department | 2 of 7
Mental Health Crisis Response Recommendations
1. Collaborate with other local jurisdictions (Orange County Sheriff's Office, Chapel Hill Police
Department, Carrboro Police Department, Mebane Police Department) to pool funding resources and
develop a coordinated, county-wide mobile mental health crisis response service. This county-wide
effort should also look at restructuring the 911 call system by either enhancing training for 911
operators so that they can divert mental health crisis calls to non-police behavioral health first
responders and/or by establishing an alternative emergency number for community members to call in
case of a behavioral health crisis.
2. Increase training. Ensure that all officers are Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) trained (this is already a goal
of the department). Assure that other first responders are also CIT trained (EMS, Fire
Department). Explore whether additional training could be beneficial, depending on what data shows in
terms of incidents in our community (e.g., the intersection of domestic violence and behavioral health,
Mental Health First Aid) and allocate funding for additional training specific to these issues, if needed.
Law enforcement officers are already required to complete a certain number of training hours per year
so new training content could be incorporated into this existing structure.
3. Allocate funding to add a minimum of 1-2 social workers (or similarly trained staff) to the Town of
Hillsborough. The social work position would serve as a co-responder to crisis calls while also
responding to calls without an officer present, when safe and appropriate. The position(s) would also
focus on preventative and follow up work, reaching out to community members to assure they are
connected to needed resources. It would also serve as a consulting role for the police department with
regards to behavioral health (mental health, substance use, and intellectual/developmental disability)
issues and needs in our community. Lastly, the social work position would review and track crisis
response data, disaggregated by demographics (with a focus on racial disparities), to critically analyze
effectiveness of responses and to identify underlying causes of behavioral health crisis calls (e.g., social
determinants of health). Housing these positions under the Town of Hillsborough rather than the police
department may increase capacity to build trust and would allow for response to situations in the town
that fall outside the realm of law enforcement yet within the realm of enhancing public safety
Traffic Stop Recommendations (short version)
1. Expand current traffic stop reporting data set to include all significant citizen interactions including but
not limited to public complaints, use of force incidents, marijuana arrests, community events, mental
health crises, and vehicle pursuits (per Chapel Hill -Carrboro/Northern Orange Branches of the NAACP
Memorandum of Understanding with law enforcement agencies).
2. Make a commitment within the Hillsborough Police Department to not pull people over by using the
traffic code as a pretext for suspect criminal behavior. Limit the investigation during a traffic stop to the
reason for the stop (except for situations that pose a risk to public safety).
3. Cease low level, regulatory traffic stops, such as equipment violation, expired tags, license plate light
out, and broken taillight.
4. Implement use of a written consent card.
Draft Recommendations for the Hillsborough Police Department | 3 of 7
5. Reallocate funding to develop resources to assist people who meet certain income eligibility criteria
with fixing minor vehicle maintenance issues, as well as assistance with registration/insurance renewal
payments. We also recommend that Hillsborough begin contributing support to the Orange County
Criminal Justice Debt fund and expand this fund to include assistance for costs related to vehicle
maintenance and registration/insurance renewal.
6. Cease regulatory checkpoints altogether.
Traffic Stop Recommendations (detailed version)
1. North Carolina General Statute 143B-903 requires police agencies to keep statistics on traffic stops.
Hillsborough began collecting this data in 2014 and submitting it to the North Carolina State Bureau of
Investigation (ncsbi.gov). Recommendation: Expand current traffic stop reporting data set to include
all significant citizen interactions including but not limited to public complaints, use of force
incidents, marijuana arrests, community events, mental health crises and vehicle pursuits (per CH-
Carrboro/Northern Orange Branches of NAACP’s Memorandum of Understanding with law
enforcement agencies).
2. A problematic trend noted by expert analysts has been the use of the traffic code to conduct a criminal
investigation. Traffic stops as a pretext for an investigation leads to disparate outcomes.
Recommendation: Make a commitment within the Hillsborough Police Department to not pull people
overusing the traffic code as a pretext for suspect criminal behavior. The goal of this recommendation
is to reduce the frequency of searches following traffic stops unless there is an imminent safety
concern. A more concrete policy to guide this commitment is to limit the investigation during a traffic
stop to the reason for the stop. For example, if someone is pulled over for broken headlight, then the
subsequent investigation (and conversation) should be limited strictly to the headlight issue, barring
extenuating circumstances that pose imminent threat to public safety (e.g., person is visibly
intoxicated).
Reasons underlying this recommendation (and some data)
A. Since Hillsborough began collecting data in 2014, the department has made a total of 9,948 traffic
stops. Out of this number, 367 led to searches, 143 led to contraband hits derived from these
searches, which led to 70 arrests. Racial disparities are found throughout traffic stop data: African
Americans are stopped at a higher rate than their overall population in all jurisdictions reviewed
(Hillsborough 2019: 33% of traffic stops vs. 21% of overall population), in non-moving traffic
violations (vehicle equipment and vehicle regulatory, 2019: 54% white vs. 37% black*), subsequent
searches as a percent of total traffic stops (2019: 8% black, 3% white), demographic breakdown of
total traffic stop searches (2019: 39% white vs. 60% black*), arrests derived from traffic stops (2019:
43% white, 51% black, 5% Hispanic*).
B. *Hillsborough demographics: 64% white, 21% black, 11% Hispanic.
Draft Recommendations for the Hillsborough Police Department | 4 of 7
C. Vehicle equipment violation is the most common reason for a traffic stop (2019: 31%), followed by
vehicle regulatory violation (25%).
3. Cease low level, regulatory traffic stops such as equipment violation, expired tags, license plate light
out, and broken taillight. When these issues arise in the context of another reason for a stop, provide
person with information on how to obtain cost assistance (see recommendation five). This allows for
more time to focus on more pressing community safety concerns, such as speeding, DWI’s, and running
red lights and stop signs. This has already been implemented in other jurisdictions including Fayetteville
and Chapel Hill.
4. Although the HPD reports very few consent searches, we still recommend use of a written consent
card, to support and educate people in understanding their rights. However, data shows that as consent
searches decrease, probable cause searches increase, resulting in no real difference in tickets and
arrests made following a traffic stop.
5. HPD reports that they make routine efforts to provide education and give warnings rather than ticket
people. Chief Hampton noted that the vast majority of vehicle stops for equipment violations do not
lead to a charge and that officers regularly help people fix their vehicles. To further this spirit of aid, we
recommend reallocation of funding to develop resources to assist people who meet certain income
eligibility criteria with fixing minor vehicle maintenance issues as well as assistance with
registration/insurance renewal payments. Orange County operates a criminal justice debt relief
program, however the Town of Hillsborough currently does not contribute money to this fund (Chapel
Hill and Carrboro do). We recommend that Hillsborough begin supporting this fund (which is available
to all residents of Orange County) and support expansion of the fund to include assistance for costs
related to vehicle maintenance and registration/insurance renewal.
6. Cease regulatory checkpoints altogether. Although Hillsborough reports only doing a very small
number (two to three in 2019, two in 2020, often to help other agencies such as the NC State Highway
Patrol), we recommend that these checkpoints cease altogether (this does not include DWI checking
stations, which serve an important public safety purpose).
Citation:
“Traffic Stops in Hillsborough, NC, 2019”: Published by Hillsborough Police Department for the Mayor’s
Task Force on Reimagining Public Safety March 2021
Use of Force Recommendations
1. The Advisory Board should hear community complaints and be able to promptly respond to
community members.
A. The Police Department should be given incentives to cooperate with the Advisory Board by
providing case information including police reports, the ability to interview officers at the scene in
question, and body camera footage.
1. The current Hillsborough policy is to store body camera footage for ninety days for incidents
that do not end in arrest. A policy should be issued that if a complaint is filed on any incident,
Draft Recommendations for the Hillsborough Police Department | 5 of 7
the body camera footage should be kept as long as the incident is under review (either internally
or by the Advisory Board).
2. Per N.C.G.S. § 132-1.4A(c), the head of the custodial law enforcement agency can disclose a
recording to any person whose image or voice is in the recording. If that person is also the
person making the complaint to the Advisory Board, a policy should be written where the
presumption is that disclosure of such recordings will be granted to a person whose image or
voice is in that recording, AND that that person can show the recording to the Advisory Board
(without making a copy of the recording as is prohibited in the statute). The Advisory Board will
be allowed to advise the person making the complaint on the proper procedure to request the
recording.
a. Alternatively, the Advisory Board shall be granted limited authority to act as the personal
representative of the person in the recording in regards to this issue to obtain any recordings
in the custody of law enforcement regarding the incident under review (N.C.G.S. § 132-
1.4A(c)(2)) and then be able to apply to the head of the custodial law enforcement agency
for the recording themselves.
b. Note: there is an effort in the state legislature to make all police recordings public record.
2. The current Use of Force policy is vague. The Advisory Board must suggest and/or create clearer
policies about when use of force is justified.
3. An issue related to use of force is a show of force. Procedures shall be developed where officers do
not need to be in full tactical gear to respond to non-criminal, or non-emergency calls. The Task Force
had a community comment about a call for a non-urgent manner for which that citizen had police arrive
at his house in full tactical gear, which was quite intimidating. Officers should dress for the type of call
to which they are responding
Hillsborough Police Department Procedures Recommendations
1. Police officers should be more involved in the community.
A. Establish policies where officers can attend community events in street clothes (off-duty), or at least
dressed down.
1. Officers should have a stand at First Friday events. Something like a popcorn machine would be
cheap and would draw people in, allowing officers to talk to community members.
2. Officers used to go to the Community Garden in Fairview; this practice should be revived.
3. Fairview Live is another opportunity for Officers to attend community-specific events and do
outreach to improve relations (and potentially recruit).
B. Meetings with various Hillsborough communities should be standard on a quarterly basis. Outreach
for these meetings should be a focus for officers. Chief Hampton reported that the annual
Draft Recommendations for the Hillsborough Police Department | 6 of 7
Community Summit isn’t well attended. Having meetings with specific neighborhoods might
increase participation. Other ideas to increase participation in the meetings:
1. Building relationships and trust with communities it is crucial to have police presence at
community events/meetings first. Connecting with community leaders to act as bridge builders
could help develop these relationships.
2. Each community has a meeting place, park, or office. Officers could post in those locations about
community forums or events so that more people know about what is happening.
3. In general, police officers should do more outreach to people that are connected to the
communities they are trying to reach. Word of mouth is really one of the best ways of outreach;
as well as connecting with leaders in the community.
2. Hiring and Training
A. Advisory Board should do exit interviews for officers leaving the police department to be able to
independently ascertain the factors that led officers to leave. Any observations or recommendations
should be reported back to the department.
B. The Advisory Board should also participate in the hiring process to review methods of interviewing
and selecting candidates. Are interviews currently panel interviews? Are scenarios provided to
interviewees to help determine how they would react in certain situations? The Advisory Board
could play a role in strengthening the interview process.
C. Those involved in recruitment should themselves be diverse. If administrative staff need to be
added to the recruitment team in order to achieve a diverse recruitment team, then do that.
Potential candidates need to see that people like them are present in the department.
D. We recommend that the salary offer for a Black, Indigenous, or Person of Color (BIPOC) potential
candidate be increased to further incentivize strong BIPOC leadership in the department. We say
this knowing that Hillsborough’s current rate of compensation is equal to or above compensation in
other local jurisdictions. A further increase would demonstrate commitment to hiring diverse staff
in leadership roles and put emphasis on the importance of that goal.
E. There is already some racial awareness training for Hillsborough officers. More hours of this training
should be made mandatory, with training content reviewed and approved by the Advisory Board.
Additional recommendations
1. Support expansion of diversion and deflection efforts underway in Orange County and fully partner with
these initiatives.
2. Reallocate/increase funding into establishment of accessible recreational opportunities for youth and
other members of the community that are located in or accessible to areas where there are statistically
higher numbers of calls for law enforcement.
Draft Recommendations for the Hillsborough Police Department | 7 of 7
3. Reallocate/increase funding for community-based and community led violence prevention programs
and other initiatives that increase neighborhood capacity to address harm and violence within their
own communities.
February 16, 2022
To: Honorable Mayor Jenn Weaver,
Commissioners of Town of Hillsborough,
and Members of the Mayor’s Task Force on Reimagining Public Safety
First and foremost, I would like to acknowledge and thank the members of the Task Force for
their efforts and work on exploring a variety of different, very complicated issues that have
resulted in the recommendations they have made.
Hillsborough is an amazing town, and I believe we have a very strong, professional and
responsive police department that many communities should be envious of. The officers and staff
who serve here work hard day in and day out to provide the highest level of service. I believe our
officers are worthy of, and have made every effort to earn, the trust of the community they serve,
and I think the 2019 Citizen Survey that showed an overall 91% satisfaction rate with police
services reflects this.
Regardless of how well we provide services, disparities for people of color exist in our data.
Unfortunately, these same disparities exist in law enforcement data across our state and nation.
These same disparities also exist across almost all of our other systems including the medical
field, education, employment, housing and others. Exactly what is driving this, and which factors
influence others is subject to significant debate.
The murder of George Floyd and the subsequent unrest and distrust of policing that followed
have brought this to the forefront in a way they cannot be ignored. We all want to find a solution.
However, we have to be sure we are looking for solutions that actually fix the problem, not ones
that simply address a symptom leaving the real problem unsolved and festering.
While I do believe that there are ways we can improve our law enforcement systems and that law
enforcement should be a part of the solution, I do not believe we can do it alone. It has to be a
cooperative effort across all disciplines and involve the public for us to make a lasting impact.
It has taken more time than I would like to respond to these recommendations, and for that I
apologize. HPD did not have an opportunity to be involved in the formation of these
recommendations and, as they covered a very broad range of topics, including some areas that
were not part of any discussions HPD was involved in, we had to do additional research to
understand some recommendations and to determine what was and was not possible. Some of the
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
recommendations still remain unclear to us, and some were outside of the purview of HPD, and
as such we really cannot respond fully to them. Many are also dependent on each other, which
complicates the response.
It was our understanding that this response is a starting point for our discussion on these
recommendations. We do not yet know how the elected officials, or our community views these
recommendations. Our responses reflect our views based on our understanding of the
recommendation, the efforts and practices of our agency, discussions among our staff and our
feeling on the need or appropriateness of the recommendation for our town and agency. As this
response is the starting point for conversation, it is critical to be clear that we are open to and
seek the direction of the Town Board, even should it be counter to what we perhaps feel is the
best course.
In this response I have tried to duplicate (or in some cases summarize for space) the Task Force’s
recommendation, and then provide a response in italics. We have done our best to respond to
each item as fully as possible by including information on items, explanations of our current
practices, explanations of limitations, action items that we are already doing/planning to do, and
in some cases alternatives.
We look forward to the discussion and additional direction on these recommendations.
Respectfully,
Chief Duane Hampton
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
Advisory Board Recommendation
The Task force has recommended that a diverse, 5-person standing Advisory Board be
established. Woven into the report, the following were suggested as possible responsibilities they
felt this board could/should be tasked with:
•Research into police practices and continue to issue recommendations to Board as necessary
•Review community complaints regarding use of force or about other police conduct.
•Review data regarding racial disparities in local policing (traffic stop data show disparities
and ideally these would be eliminated)
•Play a role in helping make HPD more diverse.
•Consider additional policies to reimagine public safety such as alternatives to policing,
educating the community about wellness and mental health resources, violence prevention,
community training to help communities reduce violence without police intervention.
•Suggest and/or create clearer policies about when use of force is justified. (from UoF section)
•Do exit interviews (from hiring and training section)
•Participate in the hiring process to review methods and helping strengthen the interview
process. (from hiring and training section)
Hillsborough is a unique town, and while some other communities have formed advisory boards
of various types, we remain unsure that this is the best path for Hillsborough. Considering the
vast number of jurisdictions cross the state and country, only a very small percentage of
communities have formed any type of advisory board, and in most cases those that have are
significantly larger jurisdictions.
On its face, HPD has no issue with creating and having any kind of community-based group that
would work with us on a regular basis, but we are not sure enough work has been done to
clearly define what this group would do and what would be expected of them. Because of this, we
do have some hesitation and concerns with this recommendation:
•Considering our Town’s size, comparatively low volume of significant incidents of
interest, existing close relationships and public access to elected officials, and already
strong internal controls, we are worried that any standing group formed would not be
sustainable as members would lose interest or simply not have enough to do.
•The role of any advisory board, and their specific tasks would need to be clearly defined.
At this point a number of things have been suggested as ideas, but they are not specific
and in some cases may not be possible due to personnel law, employee privacy and other
laws and restrictions.
•It has not been made clear exactly what problems or issues exist in Hillsborough that this
group is needed to address. Overall Hillsborough is a very safe community with an
excellent police department and few significant problems, so we are not sure exactly what
this group would be expected or empowered to accomplish.
o We already review our uses of force to a level that is far superior to the standards
used by most agencies.
o We get very few complaints about officers’ conduct and performance. These are
also reviewed to a level far above the standards of most other agencies.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
o Any time there has been a questionable situation involving a complaint or
significant use of force details have been reported to the manager and relayed to
the Town Board. In cases where termination has been recommended, details have
been shared with the Board in closed session. I do not believe we could share this
level of detail with an advisory group.
o We are already reviewing, using and making public an enormous amount of data
for an agency our size. Any requests for additional data would add a significant
burden.
o We already provide several public opportunities each year (a community summit
and a presentation to the Board) where we share information, take questions and
address concerns.
• Creating and managing a standing advisory board is going to be an added workload. It is
not clear who would be tasked with “managing” this group, but if it falls to the PD this
will be challenging and we will have to realign responsibilities and possibly add staff to
allow for enough bandwidth to handle it.
• Some of the tasks proposed for an Advisory group, such as being involved in hiring and
recruiting and addressing complaints, are somewhat time-sensitive processes, so
involving a group that meets infrequently will potentially slow down many of those
processes and cause bureaucratic problems.
• We also have a concern that creating a special group may limit how much information
ends up being shared broadly with the public at large, and because a group exists, other
citizens who might otherwise be interested in engaging with us will defer.
Should the Town Board decide to pursue forming an Advisory Board, we feel that additional
work will need to be done to define what that means and what would be expected. We are not
sure of the process but feel that it should still be a citizen-led effort to bring back to the Board a
more specific recommendation. We would suggest either reconvening the task force with that
specific and narrow mission or convening a new workgroup to accomplish this.
Additionally, we feel that if some kind of advisory board is created, doing so with a broader
Community Safety focus, that could consider all nature of community safety issues, not just
policing, would be more beneficial to the town and hopefully provide more ways to keep
members engaged.
As alternatives to forming a police-specific advisory board we offer:
1. Rely on existing Town Board as the main body to oversee police operations and issues.
We feel that our existing town board already provides much of the oversight that the task
force would like to see. We regularly share information with them, and citizens regularly
go to them with issues and complaints. We are able to frequently share information and
interact with them at a level that we may not be able to do with an advisory board.
2. Form Task Forces when issues arise. Due to the infrequent nature of significant issues in
Hillsborough, we could form task forces to look into problems, such as has been done in
this case, when problems arise.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
3. Increase transparency and communication to the community at large. We already do a
detailed annual report and have done other special reports. We are working on adding
more information quarterly and exploring ways to make our entire policy manual easily
accessible to the public.
4. If a Board is going to be created, consider a more broadly focused Community Safety
Board. A broader focused advisory board could explore a variety of community safety
and quality of life issues, as well as addressing concerns with police services. Having a
broader focus and mandate could allow this group to advise the Town Board in various
ways, and hopefully give them enough to focus on that they do not lose interest.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will support and work to make a reality whatever decision the Town Board makes
related to the formation (or not) of an Advisory Board.
• HPD is already at work on increasing transparency in reporting and policies.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
Other Task Force Recommendations
Mental Health Crisis Response Recommendations
1. Collaborate with other local jurisdictions (OCSO, Chapel Hill PD, Carrboro PD, Mebane PD)
to pool funding resources and develop a coordinated, county-wide mobile mental health crisis
response service.
HPD is supportive of creating some kind of collaborative crisis response team as it is a resource
that is sorely lacking. That said, any kind of program that is developed will have to be a
cooperative county-wide effort. Hillsborough averages 1-2 mental health/crisis-related calls
each week, including an average of one (1) reported “CIT Response” call a week. A large
majority of these calls are simply officers serving commitment papers and transporting subjects
with no issues. While the resource is needed, we do not have the volume to justify or sustain a
program on our own.
An Orange County Behavioral Health Task Force was created in 2019 and has been working on
these issues for the past several years, including work to look at proposing some kind of county
mental health facility as an alternative to hospitals. HPD has participated in this process, but
real progress is largely out of our control and dependent on all the parties being engaged.
HPD Action Item(s):
• Continue to actively collaborate with partner organizations in support of projects related
to creating a response team and/or building a behavioral health facility.
• Report to the Town Board when there is progress and some estimates of cost-share
funding needs are defined.
2. Increase training and ensure all officers are Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) trained.
HPD supports this recommendation, however we are unsure of what more we could be doing in
this area. HPD has always had a goal of having all patrol officers CIT trained and due to
staffing turnover and availability of classes, this is a continual work in progress. Currently over
half of the department has completed this training, including 80% of patrol.
The class is 5 days and is only offered a few times each year (usually 2-3 classes a year). We do
not have any control over this as it is offered by external sources. During COVID the class has
not been offered at all and is only just now starting to open up in some areas.
In 2021 HPD initiated getting all officers trained in Mental Health First Aid. While not as in-
depth as CIT, this course provides officers with tools for interacting with people in crises and
will help us bridge the gap until CIT classes become more available. Issues around dealing with
people in crisis are also incorporated into various in-service trainings each year. As an agency
we continue to look for new and additional trainings in this area.
HPD Action Item(s):
• Continue to pursue CIT training for all officers as it becomes available in Orange County
and neighboring counties.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
• Continue to keep staff trained on Mental Health First Aid
• Seek out additional trainings that can be located in the areas of mental health and crisis
response.
3. Allocate funding to add a minimum of 1-2 social workers (or similarly trained staff) to the
Town of Hillsborough
This recommendation was to add these positions to the Town, outside of the Police Department,
so this ultimately rests outside our purview. However, while we believe, and agree, that this
recommendation is well meaning, we do not believe it is practical or appropriate for our town.
Social services functions are the purview of County government, so it does not seem appropriate
for the Town to step into that domain. We do not have systems, expertise or networks in place to
support an entirely new functional area. We do not know if there are laws or limitations that
could restrict what the town can or cannot do in this area. We also do not know if there is a
volume of need that would support a position or positions considering there are already services
in place. If we as a town feel that better service provision is needed, we believe we would be
better served working with the existing county social services to enhance the structure we have
in place.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD has no specific action items planned on this at this time, but if the Board decides to
create some kind of positions, HPD will support this as best we can.
HPD Alternative:
• While not a direct equivalent, if the Board is interested in exploring adding new positions
and structures, HPD believes exploring some kind of non-armed responded model for
low-level calls for service may be a better fit and have a better overall impact for our
community. Developing this kind of program would represent a significant cost (2-3
personnel and vehicles and equipment).
Traffic Stop Recommendations
1. Expand current traffic stop reporting data set to include all significant citizen interactions
including but not limited to public complaints, use of force incidents, marijuana arrests,
community events, mental health crises, and vehicle pursuits.
HPD has always worked to be as transparent as possible and has included information in the
majority of these areas in both published annual reports, community presentations and in-person
reports to the Board of Commissioners for many years. Data on mental health calls and
marijuana enforcement have not been a part of our reporting in the past, but we have been
working to develop systems so we can include these in future reporting.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
The amount of data work we have been doing has highlighted a need for better quality control of
our records, and potentially a dedicated records/data manager position. Collecting, analyzing
and reporting data takes an enormous amount of work, and we are limited by both staff and
systems. We are a small agency and do not have anyone dedicated to just managing data and our
reporting system. Over the past year we have spent an enormous number of hours doing data
work, and at times this has pulled staff away from other tasks. In addition, our systems were not
designed or intended to report data in many of the ways we are being asked to look at it, so it
requires a lot of manual work to find and match data sets.
HPD Action Item(s)
• HPD is working to finalize a publicly available quarterly reporting system to address
many of these areas.
• HPD will continue to do annual reports and updates to the Board on many of these
issues.
• HPD will continue to make public presentations and host Community Summits to share
information about these issues.
2. Make a commitment within the Hillsborough Police Department to not pull people over by
using the traffic code as a pretext for suspect criminal behavior. Limit the investigation during a
traffic stop to the reason for the stop (except for situations that pose a risk to public safety).
Asking officers to narrowly limit investigations to the purpose of a traffic stop is not something
we support nor do we feel that is reasonable. This is also counter to a significant amount of case
law and court decisions that have been issued.
While we agree that the primary purpose for an officer stopping a car should be to enforce (or
educate) the operator about a violation. We also want our officers to then investigate evidence or
suspicions that develop once they make contact or based on information they receive. Setting a
policy where officers have to turn a blind eye to evidence and suspicions is counter to their
mission.
We agree with and understand the concern that officers, even with the good intention of trying to
get criminals off the streets, could improperly use their ability to stop cars in a way that damages
community trust. This is why it is so important for us to monitor officer behavior by analyzing
traffic stop data, reviewing body worn camera footage and having a complaint process in place.
From our review of body cam footage and traffic stop data, the vast majority of situations where
officers investigate beyond the initial purpose of the stop occur when a clear suspicion forms
after making the stop. To try and get into the officer’s head to figure out if they had suspicions
before they decided to stop a car is simply not possible.
There are occasions where a traffic violation provides an opportunity to investigate a situation
where an officer otherwise may not have enough legal justification to make a stop. A prime
example of this would be a car slowly driving through a neighborhood that has been plagued
with car break-ins in the middle of the night. Absent a clear traffic violation, the reasonable
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
suspicion to stop the car is questionable, but should the vehicle have a clear violation, such as a
headlight being out, the officer’s decision to stop the car would stand up to legal scrutiny.
HPD Action Item(s)
• HPD will continue to monitor and review officer performance internally to ensure that
officers are not using their authority inappropriately.
• HPD will comprehensively review any complaints received about officers exceeding their
authority inappropriately.
3. Cease low level, regulatory traffic stops, such as equipment violation, expired tags, license
plate light out, and broken taillight.
HPD has been working to ensure that we are prioritizing moving violations over non-moving
violations. We have been tracking the data and have seen a significant change in the distribution
of these stops over the past year as a result of our efforts. While we do agree and support the
idea of putting more emphasis on moving violations than non-moving, we do not support a policy
of ceasing enforcement of specific laws. Doing so is problematic for us in a number of ways:
1. Deciding at the local level that we will not enforce certain laws that were passed and put
into place by the state legislature erodes our system of government. Even if well
intentioned, local governments starting to pick and choose which state laws matter and
which do not, leads us down a very dangerous path.
2. Directing officers not to enforce certain laws goes against the oath officers (and elected
officials) have taken to support and maintain the Constitution and laws of North
Carolina. Officers are certified by the State and trained to enforce state laws, so being
put in a position where they have to act contrary to their oath and that training can
create professional and personal conflict.
3. Social and societal inequities will not be fixed by selectively ignoring certain laws. The
law should be applied evenly, fairly and consistently across all people. Ignoring a
problem will only mask it and not make it go away.
While not a priority, we still believe enforcing non-moving violations has a place in HPD’s
mission. Education and discretion are important tools our officers use when dealing with these
issues. While we do stop people for these non-moving violations, our officers do a very good job
applying those tools.
HPD has put significant effort into analyzing our traffic stop data and looking at the information
in different ways. We have found that while the data North Carolina collects is good, and far
superior to what is collected in some states, it also is very incomplete and does not account for
many things that can influence an officer’s decision to stop a car. We also found that for
Hillsborough specifically, we found errors in our data and issues with consistent use of some of
the reporting fields. Some of the fields are not clearly defined by the state and we could not get
any guidance on what was “correct.” We have since conducted re-training for our staff and
created a guide, so our reporting produces better data.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
There are a few places that have taken steps to change enforcement of these kind of violations
through legislative action. HPD would fully support and comply with any legislative changes
that are made. Our role is to enforce the laws that elected officials have put in place. Places that
have made changes (Virginia, Philadelphia, etc) have done so very recently and there has not
been time yet to understand the impacts of these changes. We believe any consideration of
changes in this area should wait and give these localities time to help us understand the full
implications.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will continue to track and report comparative percentages of moving vs. non-
moving violation stops.
• HPD will continue to monitor traffic stop reporting and improve quality of data.
• HPD will continue to put emphasis on enforcement of safety-related and moving
violations over non-moving violations.
• HPD will continue to monitor trends across the country and review data that is generated
by jurisdictions that have made changes to their enforcement in this area.
• HPD will support any legislative changes that are made.
4. Implement use of a written consent card for searches.
HPD conducts very few consent searches (8 in 2021) and due to this we do not feel this
recommendation is necessary. We believe that our very low reliance and use of consent searches
demonstrates that we are using this tool with restraint and only in limited, appropriate
situations.
HPD policy does require officers to capture their request for consent and the subject’s response
on their BWC. We believe this is a far superior process than any paper document as the record
of exactly what and how consent was secured is available for internal review and any court
proceedings.
While we understand there may be a concern that people may be granting consent in an
uninformed manner, this does not appear to be what is happening in our limited consent
searches. If we felt that our officers were abusing consent searches, or using coercive tactics, we
would not tolerate it. In most cases our consent searches result from clear articulable suspicions
and are quick and handled professionally and non-confrontationally.
As an additional point, almost all of the work our officers do now is electronic, so creating some
kind of form that they then have to fill out and get signed and then a process to track and manage
that paperwork is an added burden for something that is not a significant HPD tool
Current data regarding searches is limited and incomplete in many ways and does not capture
the full picture. We are continuing to monitor and gather data on searches, to better understand
when, why and how officers are doing them. We are working to make this information available
as part of our reporting process. As we continue to gather more information, the need for
additional changes may develop and we believe should be addressed at that time.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will continue to gather data on searches and report that data as part of our
quarterly and annual reporting.
• Routinely review consent searches to ensure officers are not engaging in coercive tactics
or using consent searches inappropriately.
HPD Alternative:
• If the concern is making sure that persons granting consent are informed using specific
language, then as an alternative to creating a written form, we would suggest creating
some kind of standard language that the officers would read to people off of a card
(similar to Miranda rights) and capture on their Body Worn Cameras. This would
accomplish the standardization of language and not add any additional administrative
burden.
5. Reallocate funding to develop resources to assist people who meet certain income eligibility
criteria with fixing minor vehicle maintenance issues, as well as assistance with
registration/insurance renewal payments. We also recommend that Hillsborough begin
contributing support to the Orange County Criminal Justice Debt fund and expand this fund to
include assistance for costs related to vehicle maintenance and registration/insurance renewal.
HPD is very supportive of the idea of a program to assist people with fixing minor vehicle
equipment issues. There are a few programs that exist across the country that we have looked at
trying to emulate, but they have all been larger jurisdictions that have a variety of resources and
partners to choose from. In 2020 we spoke with some of our auto parts stores about doing some
kind of pilot program. We found that while we may have been able to work out a way for people
to be able to go to them to get a bulb at no cost, the auto parts stores could not help people
install it so we ended up shelving the idea. We are still open to some kind of program like this
and would be willing to revisit it if the Board is supportive and willing to allocate funding.
We support contributing to the Orange County Criminal Justice Debt fund. This program was
started and is still managed by Chapel Hill PD. Currently only Chapel Hill PD, Carrboro PD
and the Orange County Bail Bond Project contribute, and funds are only distributed to residents
of those jurisdictions. The program assists people with paying court costs and fines associated
with violations. This program does not provide assistance with vehicle maintenance or
registration issues. I have spoken with Chapel Hill PD and while it would increase their
administrative burden, they are open to our joining the project so Hillsborough residents could
benefit. As a reference, Chapel Hill contributes $20,000; Carrboro contributes $7,500; and the
Bail Bond Project contributed $6,000.
HPD Action Item(s):
• Present to the Board, if they are supportive, a request for funding to contribute to the
Orange County Justice Debt Relief Fund and work with Chapel Hill PD to set up a
structure to partner with them.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
• If the Board is supportive, HPD will revisit the idea of developing some kind of program
to assist community members with vehicle repairs and return to the Board with a
proposal and funding request within the next 6 months.
6. Cease regulatory checkpoints
As with consent searches, regulatory (driver’s license) checking stations are used rarely by HPD
(2 in 2020 and 1 in 2021). We believe our very limited use of this tool illustrates that HPD is
using it with restraint and in an appropriate manner. Even though this is a tool we use
infrequently, we do believe it can be a valuable tool and it is an option that should remain
available.
HPD is very conscious that this tool can be abused and takes steps to make sure that when
checkpoints are done, they are not done in a manner that is discriminatory or unduly targets one
segment of our population over another. All checkpoints must be approved by a supervisor and
must have a written plan in place.
Having unlicensed drivers on our streets is a problem and these checkpoints are a tool to help
with that. In addition, these checkpoints offer additional benefits to the safety of our community
as we often find subjects that are wanted, drunk driving or have weapons. These checkpoints are
also a tool to help show increased police presence after a community has been victimized in an
effort to reassure the community.
Related to this, our officers also help other agencies (OCSO and SHP) with checkpoints they
establish. Again, this is not a frequent activity, but does happen occasionally in town. Working
cooperatively in support of our peers is very important to us.
We are actively exploring ways to conduct more DWI focused checkpoints. These generally
require more logistics and personnel than a driver’s license focused checking station but may be
an option we could use instead of driver’s license checking stations.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will continue to use regulatory checkpoints sparingly, and only at locations that do
not unduly target any specific neighborhood or demographic.
• HPD will explore moving away from regulatory checkpoints and instead focusing on
DWI enforcement checkpoints.
Use of Force Recommendations
1. Advisory Board should hear community complaints and be able to promptly respond to
community members.
This recommendation and some of its sub-parts are connected to the Task Force’s overall
recommendation of an advisory board and our response to that has been provided.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
A.1. Current Policy is to store body camera footage for 90 days for incidents that do not end in
arrest. A policy should be put in place that keeps footage involving a complaint for as long as
needed for investigation.
The Task Force’s understanding of our policy and practice is incomplete. Any footage that is
subject to a complaint, use of force, or any potential internal process is specifically held outside
of any retention guidelines until any possible reviews are completed. As soon as we become
aware of a possible complaint or internal issue, recordings are set to be retained until manually
deleted.
It is noteworthy to point out that HPD’s decision to hold non-arrest recordings for 90 days
exceeds the state records retention guidelines (30 days) and was driven by a concern that it was
not unreasonable for a complaint or problem to arise after 30 days.
HPD Action Item(s): None at this time as this is already standard practice.
A.2. Policy should be put in place to allow an advisory board to see body camera footage.
We are specifically limited by state law in this area. The statute simply does not allow us a way
to share this video with any kind of advisory board absent a court order. We can disclose (allow
them to view) the video to a person who is on the video or their personal representative. We can
only allow them to see the portion that they are in.
The recommendation suggested allowing an advisory board to act as the “personal
representative” of a person so they could be granted access, but a “personal representative” is
specifically defined in the statute language and could not be used in that manner.
HPD has sought court orders in the past to release video, and could do so in future situations,
but these would have to be addressed on a case-by-case basis and may not always be successful,
especially if there is also ongoing criminal prosecution.
HPD Action Item(s): None at this time. If an advisory board is created, then this can be revisited,
but we believe this will only be possible with legislative changes.
2. Current use of force policy is vague. The advisory Board must suggest and/or create clearer
policies about when use of force is justified.
We do not understand this recommendation and do not agree. We are always open to
suggestions for policy improvements, but feel our current policy incorporates the best practices
of our profession, reflects current case law, includes model policy recommendations and
incorporates elements that we feel make our policy stronger than many of our peers. We review
this policy annually and make adjustments as needed.
In addition, proper application of use of force goes far beyond just policy. Training and
education are key components. Use of force situations are dynamic, unpredictable and
constantly evolving. Officers have to be able to have guidelines that help them understand the
boundaries they operate in and training to reinforce and help them apply those guidelines.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
It is also noteworthy that there is work being done at the state-level to look at the possibility of
creating a state-wide definition of use of force and state-wide policies that all agencies could
use.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will continue to regularly review policy and practices in this area and keep up with
professional trends and promising practices.
• HPD will continue to educate the public on our policy and welcome public feedback.
• HPD will continue to focus on policy, training and education as tools to ensure the best
possible outcomes.
3. Procedures shall be developed where officers do not need to be in full tactical gear to respond
to non-criminal, or non-emergency calls.
This recommendation seems to stem from a singular complaint that was made to the Task Force
by a citizen who did not like the look of the current external body armor carrier our officers
wear. Our officers do not respond to calls in “full tactical gear” and we do not support changing
from our current uniform, which includes a load bearing external carrier.
We moved to the load bearing external carriers in 2019. We were sensitive to how our officers
would be perceived and selected a product that blended more with our uniforms than some more
tactical-looking products that were available. We then shared information about the carriers
(and pictures) with the Town Board before moving forward.
The decision to move to this type of carrier was made for the health of our employees. Officers
carry a significant amount of equipment, and it has been documented that having the weight of
that equipment on their belt can lead to back issues. The external carriers allow us to get a large
portion of that weight off of their belts.
We have also found that moving to this type of external carrier has been a huge morale boost.
These carriers are more comfortable, and easier for officers to change in and out of.
Transitioning away from them would not be well received by employees.
The idea that officers can change from one uniform to another depending on the type of call is
simply not practical or realistic. Officers cannot be expected to get a call, stop, make a uniform
change, and then go to the call. We require our officers to wear their body armor when
responding to any call. Officers operate in an uncertain world, often with limited information,
and there is no way to know when they may be walking into a potentially dangerous situation.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD continues to evaluate the equipment they ask officers to carry. HPD explores new
and lighter products, as well as assessing whether any items could be eliminated or made
optional.
• HPD will continue to explore other products that can benefit employee health, while at
the same time providing a softer image.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
Hillsborough Police Procedures Recommendations
1. Police officers should be more involved in the community.
A. Establish policies where officers can attend events in street clothes (off-duty), or at least
dressed down.
B. Meetings with various Hillsborough communities should be standard on a quarterly basis.
While we respect the sentiment of this recommendation and cannot argue that one can always
“do more”, we feel that HPD has, and continues, to do an amazing job of engaging with our
community. Community engagement has always been a priority for HPD. This was never part of
any discussion we were involved in with the Task Force, and as a result we feel it is important
that the amazing work our officers do in this area be acknowledged.
In 2021, in spite of COVID putting a significant damper on our activities, HPD officers spent
over 450 documented hours engaging with the community in various ways including:
• Delivering Meals on Wheels and food boxes to seniors several times each month.
• Straw for Dogs event in January.
• Classroom Visits, reading to classes, and Field trips throughout the year.
• Attending and participating in community meetings and discussions such as the Orange
County Human Relations discussion: Unraveling the #DefundthePolice debate: A
Community Conversation (March); My Brother and Sister’s Keeper Town Hall event
(June); and the One Orange public hearing for the OC racial Equity Framework
(September).
• Attended National Night Out events at Lory Apartments and on W. Queen St.
• Hosted a block party for residents at Gateway including food, bounce houses and partner
organization resources information. (August)
• Attended Pollinator Garden workdays and hosted a paver painting event for kids at
HPD’s pollinator garden. (June).
• Regularly attend Community Watch meetings such as Fairview and Cornwallis Hills.
• Attending business Grand Openings and open houses.
• Participated along with other public safety personnel in the OC Dept on Aging’s
“Storytime Adventure” presentation at the Passmore Center. (May)
• Hosted a cupcake event for the seniors at Eno Haven.
• Hosted a cookout and music event at Passmore Center in July.
• Delivered flowers to various healthcare facilities to thank and recognize their staff. (July)
• Presentation at Orange County Rec Summer Camp (July)
• K-9 Demos
• Hosted a Doggie meet and greet in plaza in front of HQ (July)
• Brought HPD’s MADD vehicle to Cedar Grove family fun day.
• Child passenger safety seat event at the Fairview Child and Family Center on Lawndale
Av. (Sept)
• Hosted a Trunk or Treat (Oct)
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
• Attended Orange Middle School Band fundraiser event
• Fairview community clean up workday (Nov)
• Meet and Greet at DSS (Dec)
• Eno Haven door decoration contest
• Winter Wonderland event in Fairview in December.
In addition to the events, HPD is currently piloting a Community Response Team that is intended
to focus on problem solving, bicycle patrol, community engagement and targeting specific issues
such as traffic complaints.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will continue to host, attend and participate in community events, including seeking
out new and different ways to connect.
• HPD will continue to support officers attending events when they are off duty, in casual
clothes.
• HPD will continue to develop their Community Response Team as a tool for more
interaction and connection.
• HPD is working to build stronger connections with various neighborhoods and develop a
system of regular contact.
2. Hiring and Training
This recommendation and some of its sub-parts are connected to the Task Force’s overall
recommendation of an advisory board and our response to that has been provided.
A. Advisory Board should do exit interviews with officers leaving the department to be able to
independently ascertain the factors that led them to leave.
The practicality and legality of this recommendation is likely best addressed by Human
Resources.
B. Advisory Board should participate in the hiring process to review methods of interviewing
and selecting candidates.
HPD has involved community members and elected officials in some hiring and promotional
processes in the past and has no issue with doing so in the future. The main reason this has not
been a sustained process is due to the sporadic nature of hiring opportunities and often time-
limited nature of our hiring processes. We often have to do interviews very quickly when good
candidates appear. Having to coordinate getting external participants involved can significantly
slow down the process, potentially costing us a candidate.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will continue to explore ways to incorporate external participants in processes
when situations and circumstances permit.
C. Those involved in recruitment should themselves be diverse. If administrative staff needs to
be added to the recruitment team in order to achieve a diverse recruitment team then that should
be done.
HPD does not have any kind of dedicated recruiting staff. Our recruiting process is managed by
the Chief and Administrative Lieutenant and supported by all department personnel. We do not
have the resources to participate in many formal recruiting campaigns. We make every effort to
highlight diversity within our limited recruiting materials.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will continue to highlight diversity in our recruiting materials and continue to seek
diverse candidates.
D. Increase salary for Black, Indigenous, or Person of Color (BIPOC) potential candidates to
incentivize strong BIPOC leadership in the department.
The practicality and legality of this recommendation is likely best addressed by Human
Resources.
E. More hours of racial awareness training should be mandatory, with the content reviewed by
the Advisory Board.
HPD continues to include training around issues of race, diversity and inclusion annually. HPD
will also be part of town-wide initiatives that are being developed.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will continue to support and participate in Town-wide efforts to provide racial
awareness training.
• HPD will continue to provide training related to bias, racial awareness and fair and
impartial policing to its staff.
Additional Recommendations
1. Support expansion of diversion and deflection efforts underway in Orange County and fully
partner with these initiatives.
127. North Churton St. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (919) 296-9500
HPD already fully supports and participates in all diversion programs that are available.
HPD Action Item(s):
• HPD will continue to support and utilize all diversion programs available.
• HPD will include diversion efforts as part of their quarterly/annual reporting.
2. Reallocate/increase funding into establishment of accessible recreational opportunities for
youth and other members of the community that are located in or accessible to areas where there
are statistically higher numbers of calls for law enforcement
This is outside the purview of HPD, but we would support it, though we recognize there are
budgetary realities.
3. Reallocate/increase funding for community-based and community led violence prevention
programs and other initiatives that increase neighborhood capacity to address harm and violence
within their own communities.
We believe this is outside the purview of HPD but are unsure exactly what is being
recommended. We would need more information to assess if this is something feasible or
practical for Hillsborough and to what extent HPD would play a role.