HomeMy Public PortalAbout06 18 2020 PC MinutesThe Town of Leesburg in Virginia
Leesburg Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes
June 18, 2020
The Leesburg Planning Commission met on Thursday, :June 1.8, 2020 in Town Hall Council
Chambers, 25 West Market Street, Leesburg, Virginia 20176. The meeting was held with a
quorum physically present. Three members of the Planning Commission attended remotely with
staff coordinating electronic participation via WebEx. Staff members present included Susan
Berry Hill, Brian Boucher, Mike Watkins, Chris Murphy, Dennis Dames, Tina Newton, and
Karen Cicalese.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Nacy called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm and made the following statement:
"Pursuant to the Town's Remote Electronic Policy, Mr. Clemente and Mr. Barney will be
participating in the meeting from his home due to concerns with the COVID-19 Pandemic and
current social distancing requirements in the Council Chamber and arrangements have been
made for his voice to be heard by everybody."
"I will now ask for a vote of the members present to allow Mr. Clemente to participate in the
meeting."
[Vote] 4-0
Chairman Nacy read the following statement regarding public participation.
"Any member of the public who wishes to speak to any item as part of this agenda may follow
the link posted on our agenda and published on the Town's website or call 1-408-418-9388 and
enter access code 129 834 6070 to join the meeting."
Chair Nacy — Present, attending in -person
Vice Chair Faliskie — Present, attending in -person
Commissioner Clemente — Present, attending remotely
Commissioner Barnes — Present, attending in -person.
Commissioner Harper — Joined the meeting at 7:16 pm remotely and a vote was taken by the
members physically present to allow her to attend remotely (Vote: 4-0)
Commissioner Robinson — Present, attending in -person
Commissioner Barney — Present, attending remotely
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Motion: Commissioner Robinson
Second: Commissioner Faliskie
Vote: 6-0-1 (Harper not present for vote)
1
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. June 4, 2020 Draft Minutes
Motion: Commissioner Barnes
Second: Commissioner Robinson
Vote: 6-0-1 (Harper not present for vote)
DISCLOSURE OF MEETINGS
None
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
None
PETITIONERS
None
PUBLIC HEARING
Chris Murphy, Sr. Planning Project Manager, Planning and Zoning
Chair Nacy opened the Public Hearing at 7:04 pm and invited staff to make their
presentation.
Mr. Murphy gave an overview of the application which is a Special Exception for an expansion
of the existing "School, Public" use in the R-4 Single -Family Residential Zoning District at 311
Catoctin Circle SW. The Applicant, Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS), proposes a 6,000
square -foot expansion to the existing 76,800 square -foot elementary school. The planned
expansion is intended to accommodate three classrooms, a resource room, office space, and
storage space. With this expansion, capacity at the school will increase from 697 to 743
students. That base capacity increase will serve future enrollment projections, as current
enrollment is 658 students.
Mr. Murphy discussed site conditions, uses on adjacent properties and zoning history noting that
Catoctin Elementary School was constructed in 1966. The Zoning Ordinance in effect at that
timedid not require special exception approval for a public school use. It was not until the
adoptionof the Zoning Ordinance revision in 2003 that public schools in residential zoning
districts required special exception approval. The Commission will note that the establishment
of the school prior to 2003 does not "grandfather" the property from requiring a special
exception for the present application.
Mr. Murphy explained that the Applicant has requested a modification of TLZO Sec. 11.6.1.F
Sidewalk and Pedestrian Facilities to allow existing sidewalk segment on the Catoctin Circle
frontage between the bus loop entrances to remain 4-feet wide. Pursuant to TLZO Sec. 11.6.1.F,
such modification request is made to the Zoning Administrator. As of the date of this report, the
Zoning Administrator has not yet finalized his determination on this request. A final decision will
be rendered prior to the Town Council public hearing.
2
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
Mr. Murphy gave an overview of site design noting that the Department of Plan Review confirmed
that all previous issues relating to stormwater management have been satisfactorily addressed by
the Applicant, and are reflected on the special exception plat. In terms of architecture, the proposed
design and building materials will be a continuation of the school's existing one-story, flat -roofed,
masonry construction architectural design. This design is consistent with the architectural style of
the surrounding neighborhoods, as they grew up around the school beginning in the 1960's -
1970's. Staff finds no adverse impact on adjacent developments is anticipated as a result of the
planned expansion's architectural design.
Mr. Murphy addressed traffic and noted that staff is satisfied with the results of the Traffic Impact
Analysis submitted with the application. Parking was also addressed and there are no additional
parking spaces required or proposed with this application.
Mr. Murphy gave an overview of the Special Exception Approval Criteria noting that the use is
consistent with the goals and objectives of Land Use Policy type Major Institutional found in
Chapter 6 of the Town Plan; Town Plan land use objectives 11 and 12 encourage infill development
and institutional uses when found to be compatible with the existing development in the vicinity;
the use complies with applicable regulations of the R-4 Single -Family Residential Zoning District
provided in TLZO Sec. 5.4; and the proposal would serve the public necessity, convenience,
general welfare and good zoning practice. He concluded his presentation with staff s
recommendation of conditional approval.
Sara Howard O'Brien, Land Management Supervisor, Division of Planning and Zoning, Loudoun
County Public Schools, delivered the Applicant's presentation. She informed the Commission that
they have completed the required notice and have submitted an affidavit to the Clerk. Notices
were sent to over 400 surrounding neighbors and posted on various public calendars. All
application documents had been posted on the LCPS website. A Community meeting was held
and noticed on November 14, 2019 with an additional meeting planned for March. However, due
to the COVID-19 Pandemic, a status update letter was sent March 20th. These letters were sent to
over 400 surrounding neighbors and posted on various public calendars. All application
documents had been posted on the LCPS website. Ms. Howard O'Brien gave a summary of the
proposed addition noting that they were planning an opening in fall of 2021. She noted that they
were in agreement with staffs recommendation and respectfully requested the Commission's
approval.
Public Comment
Doug Fultz, 509 Valley View Ave, SW, Leesburg, VA 20175 came forward and expressed
concerns regarding rain water flooding on the east side of the school at 509 and 507 Valley View
Ave., SW; tree trimming to prevent roofing/gutter damage; and concerns about the sidewalk
location at the Kiss & Ride drop off.
Tim Nichols, 507 Valley View Ave, SW, Leesburg, VA 20175 came forward and expressed
concerns regarding the drainage issues on both his and Mr. Fultz's property. He had lived at 507
Valley View Ave., on and off for 30 years and this has been an ongoing problem and has caused
significant damage.
3
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
Several Commission members expressed concerns regarding the stormwater drainage issue and
the Applicant assured the Commission that they were willing to work with LCPS engineering
and Town staff to address this issue.
Dennis Dames, Sr. Project Manager/Section Chief, Department of Plan Review, advised Mr.
Fultz and Mr. Nichols to contact the Department of Public Works and said he would meet with
them after the hearing to convey contact information.
Chair Nacy closed the public hearing at 7:44 PM.
The Commission unanimously agreed that the application was approvable but felt that the
stormwater drainage issue needed to be addressed and satisfactorily resolved prior to taking
action on the application.
Commissioner Robinson moved that Special Exception Application TLSE-2019-0009 LCPS
Catoctin Elementary School Expansion be deferred to a future date to discover the cause of the
flooding and to determine that the construction of the new addition will not cause increased
flooding.
Commissioner Faliskie seconded the motion and the motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
TLOA-2020-0001 Doggie Daycare and Catteries, Mike Watkins, Zoning Administrator,
Planning and Zoning
Chair Nacy opened the public hearing at 7:50 and invited staff to make their presentation.
Mr. Watkins explained that Town Council initiated this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance as a
result of two businesses desiring to locate in the Village at Leesburg. These businesses include a
"cat cafe" and a "doggie day care". These businesses include the overnight stay of a cat or dog.
There are limitations in the Zoning Ordinance that currently prevent this. These restrictions
include the limited number of zoning districts that permit kennels; distinguishing Kennel from
Doggie Day Care; and the limited permitted uses in the B-4 and PRC districts.
Mr. Watkins explained that the Village at Leesburg was rezoned to the B-4 (Mixed -Use Business
District) and the PRC (Planned Residential Community) District, initially with TLZM-2004-
0008. Uses at the Village at Leesburg are subject to substantial conformance with a Concept
Development Plan and proffers. The Village at Leesburg was planned and constructed with a
"main street" approach, where uses (including residential) are vertically integrated into
aesthetically pleasing buildings that frame a pedestrian friendly environment. This type of
development has become desirable for both residents and businesses, both of which are wanting
to be collocated in a well -designed "place".
Mr. Watkins gave an overview of the proposed amendments. One of the proposed uses in this
text amendment is a "cat cafe". This use would permit the interaction of store patrons with cats
and one of the key reasons for this is to encourage cat adoptions. This interaction occurs at the
4
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
place of business while shoppers look for cat accessories, or during a consultation with a design
consultant who specializes in at-home accommodations for pets. Interaction with cats is also
provided through planned activities such as art classes, exercise or yoga classes, or programs for
service groups or senior citizens. During non -business hours, the cats are kept on premises. This
use fits the current definition of Cattery in Zoning Ordinance Section 18.1.27.1 however, Cattery
is not currently included as a Personal Service use, and would not be permitted in the PRC
portion of the Village at Leesburg. This amendment would allow catteries as a permitted use in
the PRC and B-4 district subject to compliance with use standards contained in Section 9.3.12.1.
Doggie Day Care was recently added to the Zoning Ordinance as a special exception in the B-2,
B-3, B-4 and I-1 zoning districts. The addition of this use was done in recognition of its
popularity as a Personal Service use. Doggie Day Care does not currently permit the
accommodation of overnight stays as there is little to distinguish this use from the Kennel use. A
proposed doggie day care business that desires to located at the Village at Leesburg is requesting
that the Doggie Day Care Use be permitted to include overnight stays. This is currently
restricted to the Kennel Use.
These zoning text amendments propose to balance the protection of residents in mixed -use
environments, while accommodating certain businesses providing desired personal services.
If adopted, these amendments will permit certain desired personal services in mixed -use
developments. The proposed amendments include use standards that mitigate potential nuisance
issues.
Mr. Watkins discussed staff analysis noting that the requested districts include a mix of uses,
including residential. Concerns include potential nuisance impacts to residents, noise and odor
and the accessory uses should complement the intended principle use. Staff also reviewed
regulations by other communities and found that Kennels are permitted in mixed use districts and
only permitted in fully enclosed buildings. They are required to include noise attenuation
measures and may include "day care". Prior special exception approvals for Kennels (Doggie
Day Care) include My Dogs Daycare in 2013 and the Old Mill Pet Center in 2019.
The proposed cattery amendment would be permitted in all Business Districts (B-1 thru B-4) and
the 0-1 District. The use would be added to Neighborhood Retail Convenience Center in the
PRC District. A new use standard would require the applicant to provide a detail of the boarding
area and individual enclosures.
The proposed Doggie Day Care amendment would create a new use "Doggie Day Care, with
Accessory Kennel" and would permit some overnight boarding. The use would be permitted by
a special exception. The use would be permitted in all Business Districts (B-1 thru B-4) the 0-1
District and in the Neighborhood Retail Convenience Center in the PRC District. New use
standards would require the following:
• Must be in a fully enclosed building
• Require noise attenuation measures
5
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
• Demonstration that the accessory kennel is the subordinate use
• Not permitted in a building with residential uses
• May have an outdoor relief area
• Waste system must connect to sanitary sewer
• Provide a detail of the boarding area and enclosures
He asked the Planning Commission to consider the following questions in relation to Doggie
Day Care.
If overnight boarding is permitted:
• What distinguishes Doggie Daycare form a Kennel?
• Should the number of dogs be established as a use standard or at the time of special
exception?
Other questions for consideration:
• Should outside play areas be permitted?
• Should a Doggie Day Care be added to the B-1 District?
• Are there other use standards
Mr. Watkins concluded with staff recommendations as follows:
a. Staff supports the Cattery use.
b. Staff generally supports the Doggie Day Care with Accessory Kennel with the following
concerns:
• There is very little difference in Kennel and Doggie Day Care with Accessory
Kennel however, a special exception may include conditions of approval unique
to each application.
• Staff does not support outdoor play areas in the B-4 or PRC Districts due to the
potential for nuisance
Public Comment
Scott Parker, 888 N Quincy Street, #1604, Arlington, VA 22203 came forward as one of the
owners of Playful Pack. Leesburg will be their second location. They have well over 100 people
from the Town and in the Village at Leesburg that are welcoming this use and are very excited to
have this business locate there. They maintain a purely professional environment that is clean,
inviting and fresh. They have noise attenuation measures in place. He believes that this
business will be a tremendous benefit to the Town and have signed a lease over a year ago as
they work through this process.
Shane Murphy, Reed Smith, 7900 Tysons One Place, Suite 500, Tysons, VA 22102, came
forward as the representative for Rappaport Companies. The Village at Leesburg is still
struggling in the retail area and they are excited about this opportunity. A lot of the issues can be
6
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
resolved through the special exception process. These types of places are popping up
everywhere. He expressed concerns about connecting the waste treatment to the sanitary sewer
as they would like to be able to consider other waste treatment options.
Jamie Miller, 1209 E Lee Drive, Sterling, VA 20164, came forward as an employee of Banfield
Pet Hospital in the Village at Leesburg and was in support of the proposed amendment as he felt
it would be beneficial to offer this type of service in this area.
Planning Commission Questions
Where are the uses permitted by right currently?
Mr. Watkins clarified that the Cattery use is permitted in the B-2, B-3 and I-1 Zoning Districts.
The Doggie Daycare use is permitted in the B-2, B-3, B-4 and I-1 Zoning Districts.
What is the square footage of the proposed tenant space that is being considered for a Doggie
Day Care facility at Village at Leesburg?
Mr. Watkins replied that it was approximately 3,000 square feet.
What would be the maximum number of dogs staying overnight?
Mr. Parker explained that another Playful Pack just opened in November and they had about 25
dogs in daycare. They also own and operate two dog day care and boarding facilities in
Maryland and on any given week night they may have four or five dogs. On weekends it may be
15 to 20 dogs. There will be surges such as July 4th weekend where they may have up to 40
dogs. During these peak times they will have staff onsite overnight to attend to the dogs.
What is the total amount of dogs that will be permitted at the facility?
Mr. Murphy (Sean) replied that he thought that this would be negotiated through the special
exception process.
How long can a dog stay at the facility?
Mr. Watkins explained that it would be addressed at the time of special exception. The applicant
will need to submit a floor plan and address numbers, etc.
Is there residential located in the proposed location?
Mr. Parker replied there was not.
Is boarding offered because someone can't pick up their dog in time or is it a place to board my
dog while I'm on vacation?
Mr. Parker replied that it was both.
7
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
Is there a rule limiting the amount of dogs per square feet?
Mr. Parker explained that industry wide, he has seen more of limitation on the number of dogs
per staff member. They have one staff member per 20 dogs who is responsible for cleaning and
disinfecting. There is a connecting outdoor area that Rappaport would like to use as a place for
dogs to go outside for bathroom breaks.
Chair Nacy closed the public hearing at 8:39 pm and called for additional comments and
discussion from the Commission members.
A number of Commissioners expressed concerns regarding the waste management system,
unattended overnight boarding, and no outdoor area for exercise and relief breaks.
The Planning Commission focused discussion on the following:
Staff is recommending inserting Doggie Day Care, with Accessory Kennel by special exception
to the Use Tables for the 0-1, B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4, and PRC zoning districts.
The majority of Commission members were not in support of allowing Doggie Day Care with
Accessory Kennel in the B-1, 0-1 and Neighborhood Retail Convenience Center zoning districts.
Commissioner Robinson moved that per the Use Table, Doggie Day Care will remain in the
B-2, B-3, B-4, and I-1. It will not be in B-1, 0-1 or Neighborhood Retail Convenience Centers.
Commissioner Barnes seconded the motion and the motion passed by a vote of 6-1 (Nay -
Clemente).
It was suggested and supported by a majority of Commission members to put a definition for
Doggie Day Care in the Zoning Ordinance. It was also suggested to determine the terminology
to be Doggy, Doggie or Canine for consistency.
Commissioner Harper moved that a definition for Doggie Day Care and accessory boarding
facility that complies with Chapter 65 of the Comprehensive Animal Care Code of Virginia be
added to the Zoning Ordinance.
Commissioner Barnes seconded the motion and the motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
Is it necessary to add a definition for Cat Cafe to the Zoning Ordinance to distinguish the use?
Commissioner Harper moved to add a new use and definition of Cat Cafe to the existing Cattery
definition in Section 9.3.12.1.There was discussion regarding whether the Commission wished to
add Cat Cafe as a new use and if so, would it be by special exception and what performance
standards would apply.
It was determined to make Cat Cafe special exception in the B-2, B-3, B-4 and I-1 Zoning
Districts.
8
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
Commissioner Robinson made a separate motion to allow Cat Cafe in the B-2, B-3, B-4 and I-1
Zoning Districts by special exception.
Commissioner Clemente seconded the motion and the motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
Concerns were expressed regarding the dogs being able to sleep un-crated at night and it was
suggested that an additional use standard be added to specify that if the dogs were not crated at
night that a staff member must be present.
Commissioner Robinson moved to approve all of Section 9.3.12.2 Doggie Day Care and to add
the use standard "J" to mandate that dogs will sleep in crates in the evening hours, or a staff
member will be present.
Commissioner Barnes seconded the motion and the motion carried by a vote of 6-1-0 (Nay -
Harper).
Concerns were expressed regarding the waste containment system. Staff suggested that the type
of containment system could be established as a condition of approval during the special
exception process.
The Planning Commission discussed allowing the Cattery use in the Neighborhood Retail
Convenience Center District.
Commissioner Robinson moved to delete both the Cattery use and Doggie Day Care use. from
the Use Table in the Neighborhood Retail Convenience Center zoning district.
Commissioner Barnes seconded the motion and the motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
A brief recess was taken at 9:29 pm and the meeting resumed at 9:37 pm.
TLOA-2020-0002 and TLZM-2020-0004 Gateway District, Brian Boucher Deputy Director,
Planning and Zoning
Chair Nacy opened the public hearing at 9:37 pm and invited staff to make their presentation.
Mr. Boucher gave an overview of the proposed overlay district. The district will be comprised of
five segments, East Market Street, West Market Street, North King Street, South King Street,
and Edwards Ferry Road. There are fewer parcels in the Gateway District than the H-2 with 415
parcels being removed in the H-2 Overlay District and 342 parcels being added to the Gateway
District. Mr. Boucher discussed the changes in each segment as follows:
West Market Street: Only lots with direct frontage on W. Market Street are included in the area
and the frontage will be reduced to 15 feet in most residential cases.
East Market Street: Expands reach of architecture and design control while removing Single
Family Detached residential units in Potomac Station.
9
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
North King Street: Generally the same area as the H-2 District with some additions and
deletions.
South King Street: The proposed Gateway District removes 238 parcels.
Edwards Ferry Road: This segment is being added to the Gateway District as it is a major
commercial and residential corridor leading into the Historic District. It was once the major road
into and out of Leesburg for goods that were transported on the C&O Canal. The goal is to
maintain character and upgrade the experience of travelling in the corridor.
Mr. Boucher explained that in traditional residential areas covered by the H-2 District, the public
street and the private land immediately adjacent to the street are an important part of the corridor
experience. This is why the corridors will include 15 feet of residential properties. The
Ordinance would apply to fences or accessory structures built within 15 feet of the public right-
of-way. Outside of the 15 foot corridor extension, the Ordinance would not apply to single
family detached houses, existing townhouses, existing duplexes, and areas proffered into the
existing H-2 District or other proffered guidelines. However, it would still apply to structures,
buildings and signs, commercial buildings and apartment buildings.
Mr. Boucher explained the changes to the Zoning Ordinance as follows:
Design Standards (building and site design) will be added to the Zoning Ordinance to strengthen
implementation and achievement of Town goals. Universal standards will apply to all areas in
the Gateway District and include the following:
Site Design Standards
• Building Placement/Orientation
• Off-street Loading Spaces, Utilities
• Mechanical Equipment
• Solar Panels and Wind Turbines
• Outdoor Lighting
• Surface Parking Placement/Location
• Screening Walls
• Fences
• Accessory Structures
• Journey Through Hallowed Ground Landscape/Streetscape
Building Design Standards
• 4-sided Architecture
• Trademark or Corporate Architecture
• Massing
• Emphasize Primary Entrance
Modification Standards
10
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
• Submission Requirements
• Written Statement of Justification
• Approval Criteria
• Use of Adjacent Properties
• Reviewed by Staff and BAR
Mr. Boucher explained that the new district will allow for more administrative approvals than the
current H-2. Major new commercial projects will still require BAR review but with new
standards and modification process.
Phase 2 of the Gateway District Project will focus on Design Guidelines and a Streetscape Plan
to tie the corridors together, strengthen the community identity, improve the pedestrian
experience, enhance aesthetics and improve safety. Specific Segment Standards will also be
implemented in Phase 2.
Mr. Boucher concluded his presentation with an overview of frequently asked questions and
answers.
Public Comment
Molly Novotny, Urban Planner with Cooley, attended via Webex as a representative for her
client Peterson Companies. She expressed concerns regarding building design. The language
currently proposed is restrictive and there needs to be a balance. Words like similar leave a lot
to interpretation. The approval criteria is also too limiting and strict. Lastly, minor alterations
that the Preservation Planner can review are limited to seven specific elements and they are
asking that this section of the Ordinance not be so limiting.
Planning Commission Questions and Discussion
Will single family lot owners have to pay an administration fee if a structure on their property is
damaged by a storm and needs to be repaired or replaced?
Mr. Boucher explained that there currently is not a fee and assumed it would remain so. Also if
something is damaged by an "Act of God" the owner is entitled to repair or replace it.
Can the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) approval period be extended to three years in light
of the current pandemic situation?
Mr. Boucher said that the Commission could add this to their recommendation. He explained
that the intent of the COA is to have the project completed in a reasonable time frame.
Applicants can apply for a six month extension.
Can COA extension requests be required to be in writing stating why they have not been able to
complete their project and why they need the extension?
11
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
Mr. Boucher said that COA extension requests do have to be made in writing stating the reason
for the request. The Preservation Planner reviews the request to determine if an extension is
warranted. Language can be added to clarify this requirement.
When can we expect to see the design guidelines?
Susan Berry Hill, Director, Planning and Zoning explained that the schedule for Phase 2 has
begun. The H-2 Work Group will begin working on the design guidelines next week, The plan
is to have the guidelines to the Planning Commission to review in October.
The 75 day review period seems long, can it be shorter?
Mr. Boucher explained that there are different size projects. The 75 days is mainly for the larger
projects. A shorter time period for larger projects is unrealistic and would result in the need for
the applicant and BAR to agree to more timeline extensions.
Why is landscaping not sufficient as a screening method, especially when the item to be screened
is in the rear of a building?
Mr. Boucher replied that the BAR does not comment on landscaping.
What if a home is located in a neighborhood with an HOA and the HOA rules and our design
guidelines conflict?
Mr. Boucher explained that the owner would need to comply with the Town guidelines.
The following concerns were expressed:
• The proposed design guidelines are too restrictive in terms of maintenance, 4-sided
architecture, etc. and need to allow more flexibility.
• 4-sided architecture is crucial to good design
• The inclusion of 15 feet of single family residential lots
The following suggestions were made:
• Add no fees for single family dwellings to exemptions.
• Add that land development applications in a Gateway District include a BAR review and
referral
• Add a definition for public streets.
Richard Koochagian, member of the BAR as well as the H-2 Work Group came forward to
address some comments made by the Commission members. In terms of the Review Period
most all cases that come before the BAR are adjudicated in two meetings however, the larger
applications can take as long as 75 days or more. There is a lot to the guidelines and it will take
time to prepare these guidelines and protect the view shed coming into the Town.
12
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
Chair Nacy closed the public hearing at 10:48 and called for additional discussion. Seeing now
she called for a motion to continue.
Commissioner Robinson moved to move TLZM-2020-2004 and TLOA-2020-0002 to the July 2,
2020 meeting with the H-2 Work Group and staff to work on the comments provided by the
Planning Commission and petitioners.
Commissioner Faliskie seconded the motion and the motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
None
ZONING
None
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
None
STAFF AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
None
UPDATE ON CASES AT COUNCIL
None
SRTC REPORT
None
BAR REPORT
Commissioner Robinson noted that the BAR has been moving along and have had some very
long meetings.
TOWN COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT
None
OLD BUSINESS
None
NEW BUSINESS
None
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 pm
Approved by: r\
13
Leesburg Planning Commission
June 18, 2020
Karen Cicalese, Commission Clerk Kari Nacy, Chair
14