HomeMy Public PortalAbout9.6.1990 Agenda & Minutes Planning Board� tttt '��� r r� (. '* 101 E. Orange Street
01 own of .Mill' �i1.Uroug4 P.O. Box 429
(919) 732-2104
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA
You will be called by the planning staff on the day of the
meeting to ensure there is a quorum. If:you prefer, you
may call Janet and Joff 'at 732-2104.
#A-&i:l_`0P-Pet2S'mo1z- CU---be-.s Ac- D(SC-0551 /J
Please note: There are several sets of full scale plans of the Southern
States project in the planning office is anyone is
interested in reviewing them, you may pick them up and
return them the night of the meeting,
AGENDA
PLANNING BOARD
Thursday, September 6, 1990
6.30 PM
Town Barn
ITEM #1:
Consideration of additions to the agenda.
ITEM #2:
Approval of the minutes of the August 2, 1990 meeting.
ITEM #3:
Chair's comments.
ITEM #4:
Recommendation tofthe Board of Adjustment regarding the
Conditional Use Permit -1 for Southern States Cooperative to
install a 30,000`gal. propane storage tank on the west side
of Hwy -86 near the existing 18,000 gal. tank.
1. Review of the project pages 1-8
2. Review of the findings of fact. pages 2-3
3. Review of Planning Director's.Review.page 9
4. Discussion and deliberation.
5. Recommendation to the Board of Adjustment.
ITEM #5:
Discussion regarding the Park and Recreation Task Force.
ITEM #6:
General discussion on current issues, i.e. establishing new
zoning categories work, etc.
ITEM #7:
Collection of the VISION 2010 questionnaire which is enclosed
with this agenda.
You will be called by the planning staff on the day of the
meeting to ensure there is a quorum. If:you prefer, you
may call Janet and Joff 'at 732-2104.
#A-&i:l_`0P-Pet2S'mo1z- CU---be-.s Ac- D(SC-0551 /J
Please note: There are several sets of full scale plans of the Southern
States project in the planning office is anyone is
interested in reviewing them, you may pick them up and
return them the night of the meeting,
MINUTES
PLANNING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 6, 1990
MEMBERS Bill Crowther (Chair), Sam Jones (Vice -Chair), Wayne Tilley, Ken
PRESENT: Chavious, Leif Deetjen, Stephen Jones, Margaret Moore, Richard
Simpson, Ida Louise Evans, Wendy Olson (Alternate)
MEMBERS Cheshire Cole, Jim Culbreth (Alternate)
ABSENT:
OTHERS Steve Rice, Wesley Hyatt, Janet Rigsbee, Joff Coe
PRESENT:
Crowther called the meeting to order at 6:35 PM.
ITEM #1: Rigsbee asked to add as Section 6 of Item #4 a discussion of the
proposed cul-de-sac road on the Cornerstone Site Plan and the
members agreed.
ITEM #2: Simpson moved to approve the minutes of the August 2, 1990 meeting
as written.
Deetjen seconded the motion.
VOTE: Unanimous.
ITEM #3: Crowther had no comments.
ITEM #4: A review of the application by Southern States for a Conditional
Use -1 Permit to install a 30,000 gallon propane storage tank on
the west side of Hwy 86 adjacent to the existing 18,000 gallon
tank was presented by Rigsbee. She pointed out the location was
on a proposed lot as the larger tract had not been subdivided yet
and reviewed the findings of fact necessary to approve the CUP -1.
Olson pointed out industrial zoned uses cannot have impacts beyond
the property line, but in this case future property owners would
have to meet setback requirements from the tank thus losing the
use of a portion of their lot. Crowther said the Town Board had
discussed this matter and decided the situation should be written
into a covenant and was the responsibility of the owner and not
the Town.
Rigsbee presented the Planning Director's review (agenda) noting
the Fire Chief's recommendation had not been received yet and
the existing gravel road would be used for access. Deetjen said
the wording in Section 4.30.2.a, "capacity of the site to protect
adjacent property" was unclear. Crowther stated the Board was to
act as an extra pair of eyes for the Board of Adjustment.
Rice said it was the developer's opinion the site plan met all
Town requirements and they would extend the water line onto the
site. Crowther asked how big the gate was and Rice said it was
a pedestrian gate to allow for hose hook-ups. Rigsbee asked what
color was proposed and Rice said it would be white to reflect the
heat.
Olson restated she wanted to make sure approval would not set a
PLANNING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 6, 1990
PAGE 2
precedent by penalizing future property owners. Rigsbee said the
Town Board decision was for approval and the developer would
provide the extra 50' setback in the subdivision process. She
said there would be no problem recording this on the plat and then
it would be a matter of public record. Olson asked if this would
relieve the Town of reviewing the situation again and Rigsbee said
the Board could make a recommendation to the Board of Adjustment
to include this consideration as a condition of approval.
Rigsbee asked about lighting and Rice said no lights were planned
as the facility would be in operation only during daylight hours.
Chavious asked what would be used for lighting in the event of
disaster and Deetjen pointed out all emergency vehicles were
equipped with lights. Rice added the State Fire Code had
regulations concerning electrical outlets.
Rice said the Emergency Response Plan was outlined on the Site
Plan. He said he had checked with the Raleigh Fire Department
and they had no standard response plan for this type of facility.
Tilley asked if a circle drive was necessary for trucks to enter
and exit and Rice said yes. He pointed out the road actually
went off the lot and Olson asked if there was an agreement saying
the road could be used. Rice said there was but it may not be a
formal agreement. Simpson said he felt the discussion had gone on
long enough and the developers had gone out of their way to
satisfy the Board. He asked why the members kept nagging the
point.
Olson moved to recommend approval with the condition the 50'
setback consideration be worded so it would be clear this was
voluntary on the part of the developer and the zoning Ordinance
was not being ignored. Crowther added that the 50' setback also
be recorded on the plat. Olson also moved to recommend that when
the property was subdivided there should not be only a single
access road to the site.
Tilley seconded the motion.
Discussion of Item # 4, Section 6 continued with Rigsbee reviewing
the sketch plan showing the proposed new road. She said the Board
should consider safety aspects and noted that with heavy use
people would need the option of having two roads.
Rice said he was concerned the sketch plan had been taken lightly.
He said the sketch plan process was to get input that could be
agreed upon in principle, but he was not hearing that. He said a
traffic study had been prepared and submitted to NCDOT and Pat
Ivey had agreed with the findings. Rice stated he had tried to
get NCDOT's recommendations and although he did not have the
recommendations in writing, NCDOT essentially concurred with his
report.
Chavious asked for clarification of the two roads and Rice
explained there were 3 options in the traffic study, one of
PLANNING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 6, 1990
PAGE 3
which was the cul-de-sac road preferred by the developer.
Deetjen asked about the buffers along the power line and Rigsbee
said they were usually about 20-30 feet. Tilley said nothing
could be built in the power line right of way and Rice said a 150'
buffer was shown on the plans. Crowther noted the Board would
have another chance to make recommendations again and reviewed
the previous discussion and motions.
Rigsbee read Olson's motion from the minutes to accept the
developer's offer to have a 50' setback on adjacent parcels to be
written on the subdivision plat. This should be worded in such a
way as that this does not become a precedent, that this provision
is entirely voluntary on the developer's part and we are not
setting a precedent of ignoring our ordinance; and when the entire
property is subdivided and developed that the access road to the
site have 2 access points.
VOTE: 8-1 with Crowther voting no.
Deetjen asked if the 75' strip should have a Type II Buffer and
Olson said she would like to see plantings on the periphery of
the site. She asked if the 75' strip would revert back to the
developer after the public road was put in and Rigsbee said it
probably would but nothing was in writing at this stage.
Deetjen moved to recommend a Type II Buffer not be required
around the "L" shaped portion of the lot but to require a Type
II Buffer across the 79' to completely enclose the tank site.
Olson seconded the motion.
VOTE: 8-1 with Jones voting no.
Olson moved to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit -1
to the Board of Adjustment with the conditions of the 79' Type II
Buffer requirement, the wording concerning the 50' setbackand the
second access road.
Simpson seconded the motion.
VOTE: Unanimous.
ITEM #5: Crowther reviewed the progress of the Vision 2010 Committee saying
the results would indicate the degree of interest in parks and
recreation in Hillsborough. Coe suggested keeping the Parks and
Recreation Task Force intact but cancelling the meetings until
January of 1991 and Jones agreed. Crowther pointed out the Vision
2010 Committee could recommend the Planning Board reinstate the
PRTF if enough interest was indicated.
Jones moved to notify PRTF members that the Committee would be
kept intact but the meetings would be cancelled until January of
1991.
Olson seconded the motion.
VOTE: Unanimous.
ITEM #6: Crowther opened the discussion by saying the Board needed a
PLANNING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 6, 1990
PAGE 4
checklist of items to be discussed at future meetings and/or
referred to the Planning Department for attention. Olson said
the outcome of the 2010 Committee would answer many questions.
Deetjen said the work on permitted uses in General Commercial
Districts should be continued. Rigsbee said it would be a lengthy
process and Crowther noted it would almost require the services of
a consultant. Simpson said the Vision 2010 project should have
come before the Zoning Ordinance and many double standards existed
as a result. Rigsbee suggested waiting until after the 2010
questionnaires had been tabulated and added a discussion of this
issue could be added to the October Public Hearing.
Simpson said everyone was not aware of the various regulations and
said there should be better means of contacting and informing
property owners concerning planning activity that affects them.
He added that many property owners were confused about the
regulations. Olson asked if a clearly defined set of goals and
objectives were needed.
Simpson said the water issue needed further discussion and
Crowther agreed. Deetjen said downtown parking, rerouting traffic
of Churton Street, and transportation issues in general should be
considered. Evans agreed, saying the Tuliptree Drive area needed
improvements. Rigsbee pointed out this was on the Transportation
Improvement Plan but no action had been taken yet.
Simpson said he would like to see procedures simplified because
the Zoning Ordinance often contradicted itself. Deetjen suggested
the possiblility of rewriting the Ordinance and Rigsbee explained
the procedure that would be involved. Chavious said it was fairly
clear now but had not been that way in the past. Simpson agreed
stating it was too complicated for uneducated people to
understand.
Chavious said the Cedar Street extension had been started but it
looked like the road just stopped in the middle of a lot. Rigsbee
explained the Town could not get the easement necessary to
complete the project. Simpson said he liked to see progress made
when it helped poor people.
Tilley said next to the water problem, the bypass issue was the
next most pressing issue. Crowther said he would like to hear
from the Downtown Parking Committee and Simpson added he felt the
County employees were using many of the downtown spaces.
Olson said she felt walkways in town should be an issue. Crowther
said he would like to see a blending of Hillsborough and West
Hillsborough and noted this could be merged with pedestrian
issues.
Evans said two members of her family had been hit by cars on Nash
Street and she said the area needed attention. Chavious agreed
saying speed bumps were a possibility and Simpson said extra
lighting would help the situation.
PLANNING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 6, 1990
PAGE 5
lighting would help the situation.
ITEM #7: Rigsbee collected the Vision 2010 questionnaires from the Board
members. She said the questionnaire had appeared in the News of
Orange and invited the Board members to come and speak at the
two remaining meetings. Crowther pointed out to the Board they
would also have an opportunity for input into the 2010 process
at a later date.
Simpson said he felt the 2010 Committee was composed of the
"chosen few" and there was not equal representation for Blacks on
the Committee. He said it was possible that "small minded people"
might not want anyone else in town. Deetjen pointed out the
Committee was established to receive public input and not to
exclude any portion of the Town's population. Simpson also said
if there was no input then the 2010 Committee should be dissolved,
adding he felt young people had their own ideas about
Hillsborough. He noted he had applied for the 2010 Committee but
had not been selected. Crowther reminded the members the 2010
project would come back before both the Planning Board and the
Town Board in the future.
There being no further discussion, Deetjen move to adjourn the
meeting.
Tilley seconded the motion.
VOTE: Unanimous.
Crowther adjourned the meeting at 8:40 PM.
Joff Coe, Secretary