Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout7.7.1992 Agenda & Minuets Planning BoardTown of MillshorourA HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 101 E. Orange Street P.O. Box 429 (919) 732-2104 AGENDA PLANNING BOARD Tuesday, July 7, 1992 6:30 p.m. Town Barn ITEM #1: Consideration of additions to the agenda. ITEM #2: Comments from the Chair. ITEM #3: Approval of the minutes of April 7, May 5, and June 2, 1992 meetings (attachment). ITEM #4: Appoint member to Town Entranceway Committee (attachment). ITEM #5: Update on the Occoneechee Park Committee's work (Hervey McIver). ITEM #6: Review of Rezoning request of L.W. Walker to rezone approximately 20,000 `v square feet in the 300 block of West Corbin Street from R-20 to R-10 (Tax Map 4.13.B.3b) (attachment). ITEM #7: Review of Rezoning request of Hilda Winecoff to rezone .42 acres on West King Street from R-20 (Residential) to CC (Central Commercial) (Tax Map 4.36.A. 12) (attachment). ITEM #8: Discussion of Text Amendment to allow limited residential uses in Office - Institutional District. (attachment)(vote required to send to Public Hearing). ITEM #9: Discussion of Text Amendment to distinguish and define private kennels from commercial kennels. (attachment)(vote required to send to Public Hearing). ITEM #10: Discussion of proposed changes to the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (attachment)(vote required to send to Public Hearing). ITEM #11: Discussion of possible changes to terms of office for members (attachment). ITEM #12: Adjournment. It is essential to have a quorum present at this meeting. Please call the Planning Department if you cannot attend. 732-2104 MINUTES PLANNING BOARD July 7, 1992 MEMBERS Bill Crowther(Chair), Wayne Tilley (Vice -Chair), Cheshire Cole, Louise Evans, PRESENT: Margaret Moore, Wendy Olson, Quanda Turner, Kendall Abernathy (Alternate), Robert Murphy (Alternate) MEMBERS Ken Chavious, Leif Deetjen, Sam Jones ABSENT: OTHERS L.W. Walker, Margaret Hauth PRESENT: Crowther called the meeting to order at 6:32 pm ITEM #1: Hauth asked to add Item 7A, rezoning request to correct a map error and the members agreed. ITEM #2: Crowther mentioned his concern about poor attendance by some members, particularly Chavious. He noted the provision in the Rules of Procedure and the Zoning Ordinance allowing three unexcused absences before removal from the board was considered. He asked Hauth to prepare an attendance report for the next meeting. ITEM #3: Meeting minutes from April, May, and June were reviewed. MOTION: Cole moved to approve the minutes as presented. Olson seconded. VOTE: Unanimous. ITEM #4: Hauth briefly explained the work and format of the recently appointed Entranceway Committee. Crowther asked for volunteers to serve as Planning Board representative. He also noted Murphy's interest in this issue and suggested continuing this item to later in the meeting. The members agreed. ITEM #5: Hauth asked that the presentation by the Occoneechee Park Committee be moved to the end of the agenda to allow McIver to arrive. The members agreed. ITEM #6: Hauth explained the rezoning request filed by Walker to rezone a lot on West Corbin Street from R-20 to R-10. She added that the item would be discussed at the July Public Hearing and that Walker was present if the members had questions. Olson asked Walker about drainage and erosion control at the construction site of the houses being built. Walker said that grass will be planted as soon as possible to help control and slow the runoff. ITEM #7: Hauth presented the rezoning request of the Johnston estate to rezone the Winecoff house lot from R-20 to CC. She noted the request would be heard at the Public Hearing and that the Historic District Commission would look at the request at their next meeting. Planning Board July 7, 1992 page 2 ITEM #7a: Hauth presented the rezoning request on Town Board on behalf of Fletcher Barber to rezone the Thompson Garage lot on NC 86 North from R-40 to GC. She noted that the Board would be voting to send this item to public hearing during the July meeting as their own request because the property was incorrectly zoned residential although the property has been in commercial use for as long as many people can remember. She added that Barber's plans for the lot were included in the packet as information, but should not effect the members's decision as those plans are not binding; once the property is rezoned, any permitted commercial use could be built. ITEM #8: Hauth presented the proposed text amendment to allow residential uses in the Office -Institutional district. She said this would increase the availability for mixed use developments. She also said that since OI is typically considered a less intense use of a property, residential districts could be buffered from commercial districts by OI districts without necessarily removing the residential uses. MOTION: Olson -> send the amendment to the July Public Hearing. Abernathy seconded. VOTE: Unanimous. ITEM #9: Hauth described the current gap in the Ordinance as it relates to keeping animals on one's property. She noted that she has been receiving more complaints about loud dogs, straying animals, and similar complaints. The Ordinance currently provides no relief for neighbors. She described the definitions in the Orange County Ordinance and noted the permit requirements that are enforced by Animal Control. The members discussed the types of animals this would apply to including indoor pets likes cats, fish, and birds. They questioned the enforceability of a vague definition. Concern was also raised about the difference between different breeds of animals, especially between hunting and toy dogs. The members were in consensus that this amendment would require further time and study. They directed Hauth to collect more information about their concerns and to work with Animal Control. ITEM #10: Hauth briefly presented the proposed text to update the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. She mentioned that the prohibition of construction within the floodplain had been discussed but was not included in the proposed text. She added that either Orange or Durham County does not allow construction in the floodplain. Olson and Crowther both mentioned the potential use of the floodplain for recreation and were asked if the prohibition would include recreational uses. Hauth said she did not know. The members were in consensus that since the changes are not mandatory, further thought should be given to the amendments. They asked to receive the Orange County Ordinance at the next meeting, for comparison and coordination. Planning Board July 7, 1992 page 3 ITEM #11: Hauth briefly explained the County's term of office schedule and its impact on members. Crowther noted that the packet memo also addressed staggering terms, which is another matter. He added that adjusting of terms to fit the County schedule could be arranged on a member by member basis, as could possibly the staggering of terms. The members were generally in agreement that they would be willing to adjust their terms. ITEM #4: Crowther asked to return to Item 4 and appoint a representative to the Entranceway Committee. Murphy (who arrived during the meeting) said he would be interested in serving to the degree that his schedule would allow. The members were in consensus that Murphy should be the representative. ITEM #5: Since McIver was unable to attend during the meeting time, Crowther asked Hauth to establish another time. Crowther adjourned the meeting at 7:45 pm Respectfully submitted, -o I A tAL Margarets A. Hauth, Secretary