HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution 66-6231
City:
RESOLUTION NO. 66 -623
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
TEMPLE CITY DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO CALL A SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION
AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PROTESTS
BY PROPERTY OWNERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temple
1. That it is the intention of the City Council of the City
of Temple City to call a special election to be held in certain in-
habited'territory contiguous to said City, proposed to be annexed
thereto, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors
residing in said territory the question whether or not said territory
shall be annexed to the City of Temple City.
Said territory is described as set forth in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto.
2. That said territory hereby is designated and identified
as "Annexation No. 12."
3. Notice hereby is given that on the 7th day of July, 1966
at the hour of 7 :30 P. M., in the Council Chamber of the City Hall of,
the City of Temple City, any person owning real property within said
territory so proposed to be annexed and having any objection to the
proposed annexation may appear before said City Council and show
cause why such territory should not be annexed. Such protest must be
in writing and shall state the name or names of the owner or owners
of the property effected by such annexation and the location and area
of such property in general terms. If it be found that protest is
not made by public and private owners equal to one -half of the value
of the territory further proceedings shall be taken in accordance
with the law for the holding of such special election.
4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution and cause the same to be published in the Temple City
Times once a week for the two weeks prior to the hearing.
ADOPTED this 21st day of June, 1966.
ATTEST:
Aid
City Clerk
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly
adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular
meeting held on the 21st day of June, 1966, by the following vote
of the Council:
IAYES: Councilmen- Beckley, Clemson, Harker, Merritt, Tyrell
NOES; Councilmen- None
ABSENT: Councilmen -None
900
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED
"ANNEXATION N0. 12 - NORTH TEMPLE CITY . INHABITED"
TO THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
That parcel of land in the County of Los Angeles, State of
California included within the following described boundary:
Beginning at the intersection of the northerly prolongation
of the easterly line of Lot 8, Tract 3707 as shown tin- map re-
corded in Book 40, page 51 of Maps in the otfice of the County Record-
er of said County with the center line of the Pacific Electric Railway
Company right of way (60 feet wide) (abandoned) as descrih;:zi Book
88, page 192 of Deeds in the office of said Recorder, s!!d intersec-
tion being a point in the westerly boundary of the City cf Arcadia as
the same existed on July 1, 1965; thence westerly along Fold center
line to the northerly prolongation of the westerly line of that por-
tion of the Land of A. B. Chapman in Rancho Santa Anita as per Case
No. 4780 of the District Court of the 17th Judicial District cf the
State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles described in
deed to Louis W. and Eleanor V. Paulsen recorded as Document No. 1596
on September 2, 1960, in Book D965, page 221 of Official Records in
the office of said Recorder; thence southerly along said last mention-
ed prolongation, said westerly line and the southerly prolongation of
said westerly line to the center line of the Southern Pacific Railroad
Company's Right of Way (40 feet wide) (abandoned) as shown on map of
Tract No. 4850 recorded in Book 52, pages 11 and 12 of said Maps;
thence westerly along said last mentioned center line to the most
northerly corner of Lot 1, Tract No. 19350 as shown on map recorded in
Book 498, pages 31 and 32 of said Maps; thence southerly parallel with
the northerly prolongation of the most easterly line of said last men-
tioned tract to the southerly line of said Southern Pacific Railroad
Company's right of way; thence easterly along said last mentioned
southerly line to a line that is parallel with the westerly line of
Lot 79 of said Tract No. 4850 and that passes through a point in the
southerly line of said last mentioned lot distant easterly thereon
145 feet from the southwesterly corner of said last mentioned lot;
thence southerly along said last mentioned parallel line to the
southerly line of said lot; thence southeasterly in a direct line to
the intersection of the northerly line of Lot 56 said last mentioned
tract and the easterly line of the Westerly 158.07 feet of said last
mentioned lot; thence southerly along said last mentioned easterly
line to the southerly line of said last mentioned lot; thence westerly
along said last mentioned southerly line to the northwesterly corner
of Lot 55, said last mentioned tract; thence southerly in a direct
line to the southwesterly corner of said last mentioned lot; thence
southerly along the westerly line of Lot 54 said last mentioned tract
a distance of 68.75 feet; thence easterly parallel with the northerly
line of said last mentioned lot a distance of 100 feet; thence souther.
ly parallel with said last mentioned westerly line and its southerly
prolongation a distance of 85 feet; thence easterly parallel with the
southerly line of said last mentioned lot a distance of 51.5 feet;
thence southerly in a direct line to a point in the southerly line
of Lot 53 of said last mentioned tract distant easterly thereon 183
feet from the southwesterly corner of said last mentioned lot; thence
southerly in a direct line to a point in the northerly line of Lot 30
said last mentioned tract, distant easterly thereon 150 feet from the
northwesterly corner of said last mentioned lot; thence southerly
parallel with the westerly line of said last mentioned lot and its
southerly prolongation a distance of 145.2 feet; thence westerly
parallel with the northerly line of Lot 29 of said last mentioned
tract to the westerly line of said last mentioned lot; thence souther-
ly along said last mentioned westerly line and its southerly prolonga-
tion a distance of 145.2 feet; thence easterly parallel with the north
erly line of Lot 28 said last mentioned tract a distance of 80 feet;
thence southerly parallel with said last mentioned prolongation to
the southerly line of Lot 27 said last mentioned tract; thence south-
easterly in a direct line to a point in the northerly line of Lot 4
said last mentioned tract, distant easterly thereon 180 feet from the
northwesterly corner of said last mentioned lot; thence southerly
parallel with the westerly line of said last mentioned lot to the
southerly line of said last mentioned lot; thence westerly along said
last mentioned southerly line to the northwesterly corner of Lot 3
said last mentioned tract; thence southerly in a direct line to the
southwesterly corner of said last mentioned lot; thence easterly along
901
Schedule A, Annexation No. 12, page 2
the southerly line of said last mentioned lot to a line parallel with
and 20 feet easterly measured at right angles from the westerly line
of Lot 2 said last mentioned tract; thence southerly along said last
mentioned parallel line to the southerly line of said last mentioned
lot; thence easterly along said last mentioned southerly line to the
southeasterly corner of said last mentioned lot; thence northeasterly
in a direct line to the intersection of the westerly line of Lot 14,
Tract No. 10815 as shown on map recorded in Book 183 pages 7 and 8
of said Maps, with the southerly line of the northerly 16 feet of saic
last mentioned lot; thence easterly along said last mentioned souther-
ly line to the easterly line of said last mentioned lot; thence south-
erly along said last mentioned easterly line to the southeasterly
corner of said last mentioned lot; thence southwesterly in a direct
line to the intersection of the northerly line of Lot 6, Sunny Slope
Vineyard Subdivision No. 2 as shown on map recorded in Book 10, page
iF81 of said Maps with the easterly line of the westerly 73.02 feet of
said last mentioned lot; thence southerly along said last mentioned
easterly line to the northerly line of Tract No. 11902 as shown on
map recorded in Book 380 pages 27 and 28 of said Maps; thence westerly
along said last mentioned northerly line to the northeasterly corner
of Lot 1 said last mentioned tract; thence southerly in a direct line
to the southeasterly corner of said last mentioned lot; thence south-
erly in a direct line to the northeasterly corner of Lot 5 said last
mentioned tract; thence southerly in a direct line to the southeaster-
ly corner of said last mentioned lot; thence westerly along the south-
erly line of said last mentioned lot to the northeasterly corner of
Lot 1, Tract No. 3507 as shown on map recorded in Book 34, page 93
of said Maps; thence southerly along the easterly line of said last
mentioned lot to the southeasterly corner of said last mentioned lot;
thence southwesterly in a direct line to the intersection of the west-
erly line of the easterly 31.9 feet of Lot 42, said Sunny Slope Vine -
yard Subdivision No. 2 with the northerly line of said last mentioned
lot, thence southerly along said last mentioned westerly line to the
northerly line of Lot 60 said Sunny Slope Vineyard Subdivision No. 2,
said last mentioned northerly line being the northerly boundary of the
City of Temple City as the same existed on July 1, 1965; thence easter
ly along said last mentioned boundary and following the same in all
its various courses to the southwesterly corner of Lot 7, Block B,
Santa Anita Land Company's Tract as shown on map recorded in Book 6,
page 137 of said Maps, said last mentioned southwesterly corner being
an angle point in said last mentioned boundary; thence northerly alone
the easterly line of Temple City Boulevard (formerly Sunset Boulevard)
(60 feet wide) as shown on said last mentioned map to a point in said
last mentioned easterly line distant northerly thereon 10.23 feet
from the northwesterly corner of Lot 3, said Black B, said last men-
tioned point being an angle point in the boundary of said City of
Arcadia; thence westerly along said last mentioned boundary and follow-
ing the same in all its various courses to the point of beginning.
902