HomeMy Public PortalAboutAPP 007~04TOWN OF GULF STREAM
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR. Mayor
JOAN K. ORTHWEIN, Vice Mayor
FRED B. DEVITT III
CHRIS D. WHEELER
MURIEL J. ANDERSON
April 30, 2007
Nicholas Coon & Paul Condon
4110 County Road
Gulf Stream, FL 33483
Dear Mr. Coon and Mr. Condon:
Telephone
(561) 276 -5116
Fax
(561) 737 -0188
Town Manager
WILLIAM H. THRASHER
Town Clerk
RITA L. TAYLOR
This is to confirm that at the Regular Meeting held by the Town Commission on April 13, 2007,
your Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review application to pen-nit the demolition of the existing
structure and the construction of a Bermuda style, partial two -story single family dwelling with
basement and swimming pool, consisting of 4,280 square feet, two Special Exceptions to permit
reduced minimum setback requirements due to the property being less than 13,000 sq. ft. in size
as provided in Section 0- 75(e)(1) of the Code of Ordinances and to permit unenclosed covered
porch areas that exceed the maximum permitted FAR by 115 sq. ft. at the above address was
considered.
Your requests were approved with the following conditions:
1) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the owner of the property shall prepare and
record a deed restriction, which shall provide that all trellis areas remain uncovered as per the
approved Site Plan for as long as the stricture is in existence.
2) Prior to issuance of a building permit, spot elevations along the sides of the property will be
provided every 20' from front to rear and a sealed survey indicating such shall be provided to
Town Hall.
3) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, an as -built survey shall be provided to Town
Hall that includes the same side yard spot elevations.
4) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the owner of the property shall prepare and
record deed restrictions which shall provide that all uninhabitable areas and basement areas as
per approval of the Site Plan shall remain uninhabitable as long as the structure is in existence.
5) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan
for approval by the town manager.
100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA 33483
If a building permit, including the aforementioned improvements, is not applied for by April 13,
2008, these approvals will expire.
Sincerely,
- i
Y e Manboard, CMC
Deputy Town Clerk
cc: Shane Ames, Architect
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT
Application #: 007 -04
Owner: Nicholas Coon & Paul Condon
Address: 4110 County Road
Agent: Shane Ames, Ames Design
Proposed Improvement:
Demolition of existing structure and construction of a
Bermuda style single family dwelling with basement
and swimming pool, consisting of 4,280 SF livable
spaces.
Approvals Requested:
Special Exception:
To permit reduced minimum setback requirements due
to the property being less than 13,000 SF in size as
provided in Section 70 -75 (e) (1) of the Code of
Ordinances as follows: a. Side setback for principal
structure, 10' minimum each side. (b) Rear setback for
principal structure, 15' minimum. (c) Rear setback for
accessory structure, 10' minimum.
Special Exception:
To permit unenclosed covered porch areas that exceeds
the maximum permitted FAR by 115 SF.
Level III Architectural/Site Plan: To permit the demolition of the existing structure and
the construction of a Bermuda style, partial two story
single family dwelling with basement and swimming
pool, consisting of 4,280 SF.
Gross Lot size: 13,970 SF
Proposed Total Floor Area: 4,395 SF
Livable Area, 3,277 SF Basements
Zoning District: RS -N /S
Issues Considered During Review:
Section 66 -1 Definitions
Effective Lot Area: 12,970 SF
Allowable: 4,280 Livable SF, Basement SF N/ A
Height: 30.0' (roof height <_30' Preferred)
Basement shall mean that portion of a building, the ceiling of znhich is entirely belozn grade or less
than four feet, six inches above grade. A basement is not considered a story with regards to the
height measurement of a building. A basement is designed for, adapted to, and used solely for the
purpose of auto storage, heating and other utility purposes for the main building with no
entrances to such basement on the street side and the exterior appearance of such basement
conforming to the general architecture of the building.
Section 70 -70 Floor area calculations
Section 70 -31 North /South District
Section 70 -71 Floor area ratios
Section 70 -72 Special exception floor area ration (FAR)
(b) Roof projections. Up to 300 square feet of roof projections (covered, unenclosed floor areas)
may exceed the maximum permissible FAR subject to conditions.
Application appears to meet the standards for review.
Section 70 -74 Setbacks
Section 70 -77 First floor elevation
Architectural Review and Planning Board
ARPB File #007 -04
ARPB March 22, 2007; TC April 13, 2007
Section 70 -75 Special Exception setbacks
(e) Structures on properties less than 13,000 square feet.
Application appears to meet the standards for review.
Section 70 -100 Roof and eave heights
Page 2
Motion to recommend approval of Special Exception to permit reduced minimum setback
requirements due to the property being less than 13,000 SF in size as provided in Section 70 -75
(e) (1) of the Code of Ordinances as follows: a. Side setback for principal structure, 10'
minimum each side. (b) Rear setback for principal structure, 15' minimum. (c) Rear setback for
accessory structure, 10' minimum.
Motion to recommend approval of Special Exception to permit unenclosed covered porch areas
that exceed the maximum permitted FAR by 115 SF with the following condition:
1. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the owner of the property shall
prepare and record a deed restriction which shall provide that all roof projection areas
required to remain unenclosed as per approval of the special exception shall remain so
for as long as the structure is in existence or exceed the maximum permissible FAR.
Motion to recommend approval Level III Architectural/ Site Plan based on a finding that the
proposed demolition of the existing structure and the construction of a Bermuda style, partial
two story single family dwelling with basement and swimming pool, consisting of 4,280 SF
meets the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards with the
following condition:
1. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the owner of the property shall
prepare and record a deed restriction which shall provide that all trellis areas remain
uncovered as per approval of the Site Plan for as long as the structure is in existence.
2. Prior to permit spot elevation along the sides of the property will be provided every
20' from front to rear and a sealed survey indicating such shall be provided to Town
Hall.
3. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, an as -built survey will be provided to
Town Hall that includes the same side yard spot elevations.
4. Prior to an issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the owner of the property shall
prepare and record deed restrictions which shall provide that all uninhabitable areas
and basement areas as per approval of the Site Plan shall remain uninhabitable as
long as the structure is in existence.
5. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, applicant shall submit a revised
landscape plan for approval by the town manager.
ARPB Date: March 22, 2007
Action:
Special Exception (1): Recommend approval (5 -0)
Special Exception (2): Recommend approval with 1 condition (5 -0)
Level III Architectural/ Site Plan: Recommend approval with 5 conditions (5 -0)
TC Date: April 13, 2007
Action:
Special Exception (1): Approved (5 -0)
Special Exception (2): Approved with 1 condition (5 -0)
Level III Architectural/ Site Plan: Approved with 5 conditions (5 -0)
Town of Gulf Stream
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream
Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and /or Town Commission. To complete the
form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for
Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration.
ARPB File # 0
To be completed by all applicants.
A. Project Information
I.A.1. Project/Owner Na
I.A.2. Project Address:
PART II. GENERAL INFORMATION
40 /',
/ ems,
LA.3. Project Property Legal Description: _ _ , p,y , 3 (4 '10'..' ,1 S �P S
-So Q '� 4 3 t.4c f P/ F_ ._ 1
I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stories, etc. /
I.A.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: y?j o
Architectural Style:
1.A.6. Check all that apply: WArchitectural/ ite Plan Review Viand Clearing ❑ North Ocean Boulevard
Overlay (complete seclio�y' 8) R' Demolition of Structures ❑ Non - residential uses ❑ Variance
(complete section G) OR Special Exception (complete section ,E)
1.A.7. (a) Proposed F.F.E.: Z
Type of Foundation:
B. Owner Information /
I.B.1. Owner Address:_ �%�,'G q0 /A s o0
I.B.2. Owner Phone Number: �6, - sy Z - 72 Z Fax:
I.B.3. Owner Signature: -
C. Agent Information
I.C.1. Agent Name and Firm Name: S�`j�w e-
I.C.2. Agent Address: Z p 3 /� >
I.C.3. Agent Phone Number: (o)
1.C.4. Agent Signature:
Pre -App Date:
App Date: / 6--d
Com Date:
Decision:
,,Official Use Only
ARPB Date: .j -1 .) _U %
Recommendation:
TC Date:
,)-- A l l5 -3 1-o
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000
revised 6/13/00
%C 4w'e
Fax 5S�/,27y_ o y ycl
Page 2
Town of Gulf Stream
PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
To be completed by all applicants after pre - application conference with Town Staff. Please be concise but
question number for each response.
brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include Ure appropriate and complete
A. Project Description and Justification
IILA.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? _
III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of [tie zoning district? L1 Yes ❑ No
Explain.
III.A.3. Is the project consistent 5WT file Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies
Comprehensive Plan? Yes ❑ No of file
Explain.
III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided?
Co V .1.
III.A.5.
a.
b.
d.
e.
f.
9•
h.
How are the following utilities to be provided to the propel
Stormwater Drainage
Sanitary Sewer
Potable Water 1� S
Irrigation Water
Electricity
Telephone_ 'B
SOy
Gas
Cable Television Ade tPk—la
III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are
consistent with the criteria in Section 66 -144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional
sheet if necessary.)
.1-e
PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre - application conference with Town staff. Answering
"Yes "to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated.
A. Additional Approvals /Requirements
IV.A.1. Does the project inv ve land area within fifty feet (50') of the A1A (North Ocean Boulevard) right -of-
way? ❑ Yes WINO (If "Yes ", section B of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.2. Does the project involve file demolition of one or more structures? R Y' es ❑ No
(If "Yes ", section C of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or filling of any portion of �ayexisting vacant lot or more than
fifty percent (50 %) of (lie landscaped area of a developed lot? 9d Yes ❑ No
(If "Yes ", section D of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.5. Do s the project require approval of a Special Exception?
Yes ❑ No (If "Yes ", section E of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.6. Is the proje at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code?
❑ Yes 0VNo (If "Yes ", section G of (his part must be completed.)
'Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000
Page 3
Town of Gulf St
B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit
IV.13.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what
extent?
IV.B.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance /addition:
IV.B.3. Will the disturbance /addilion destroy or seriously impair visual relationships among buildings,
landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material
that destroys or impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District?
Yes No
Explain:
IV.B.4. How is the design consistent with the AM Landscape Enhancement Project?
IV.B.5. What mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance /addition has the least impact possible to the visual
and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District:
C. Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit
IV.C.1. When are the existing structures to be demolished? S .P
IV.C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed?
IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished?
D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit
IV.D.1. Describe those vegetative materials of 8 inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard
Overlay District:
IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal /relocation:
IV.D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated:
IV.D.4. How are the remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the
land clearing and constriction activilies.and thereafter?
IV.D.5. What replacement materials are proposed?
Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 4
February 2002
Town of Gulf Stream
E. Projects Requiring Special Exceptions
IV.E.1. Is the proposed use a permitted Special Exception use? es No Code Section:
IV.E.2. How is the use designed, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety,
welfare, and morals will be protected?
- _%C_ (.%
z_-.m
IV-E-3. Will the use cause su tantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it is tto'6ee'g
located? Yes
Explain:
IV.E.4. How will the use be compatible with adjoining development apd the )� racter of the District whe e it is
to be located? —1—" s, ,AC_ 4f- 1.0— 1 L1 _ . , 7 _
S e-> Jr� j Z16'
IV.E.5. What landscaping and screening are provided?
IV.E.6. Does the use conform with all applicable regulations governing the District wherein it is to be located?
ff No
Explain:
F. Non - Residential Projects of Greater than 2 Units
IV-F.1. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how they are to be maintained:
IV.F.2. If recreation facilities are to be provided, describe them and their potential impacts on surrounding
Properties.
IV.F.3. For each of the following, list the number provided and their dimensions:
Loading Spaces:
Standard Parking Spaces:
Small Car Parking Spaces:
Handicapped Parking Spaces:
Driveways /Aisles:
Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 5
February 2002
Town of Gulf Stream
G. Projects Requiring a Variance (code Section 66 -150 through 157)
IV.G.1. From what specific Zoning Code regulation is a variance requested?
IV.G.2. What does the Zoning Code require for this specific site?
IV.G.3. What is proposed?
IV.G.4. What is the total variance requested?
IV.G.5. The following 8 mandatory variance findings from Section 66 -154, must be addressed: (Attach
additional sheet if necessary.)
(1) What specific conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning
district?
(2) Did the special conditions and circumstances result from the actions of the applicant? Yes No
(3) Will granting the variance confer upon the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning
Code to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? Yes No
Explain:
(4) How would a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of
rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the same terms of the
ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant?
(5) Is the Variance requested the minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the land,
building or structure? Yes No
Explain:
(6) Will granting the variance permit any prohibited use to be established or re- established: Yes No
(7) Is the requested variance consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the future Land Use Map
of the adopted Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
(8) Will the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and not
be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes No
Explain: _
Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 6
February 2002
i own of Gulf Stream
n ,
H. Projects Requiring Rezoning
IV.H.1. What is the Future Land Use designation of the project site?
IV.H.2. If the project involves a rezoning
Comprehensive Plan text ez change, , Zning Code text change Future Land Use Map change,
or any combination thereof,
justification for the request, please describe the need and
PART V. OPTIONAL INFORMATION
This entire Part is optional for all applicants. q pplicants are encouraged, but not required, to provide any
additional relevant information regarding the project that was not covered elsewhere on th
the other materials submitted with the application, is form or on any of
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000
revised 6/8/00
Page 7
��. . ��
b ��;
��,
9� 1 �
CONST. INLET NO. 1
TYPE "[I "
GRATE = 10.80'
INV = 7.05
CONST. INLET NO. 1
TYPE " II "
GRATE = 16.00'
INV = 7.05
1. 2'
O
O
O
O
r—
O
O
0
O
O
z
Provide Water Quality Treatment:
Greater of the following: (A) Store the first inch for the entire site or
(B) The amount of 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness
(A) Volume = 1in. x .3208 ac. x 1/12 = .03 ac —ft
(B) Volume = 2.5 in. x (Impervious Area / Site Area) x (Total Area / 12) = .025 Ac— ft
Total Required Water Quality = 0.03 oc —ft
Water Quality Provided by 80' of Exfiltrtation Trench Which Provides aprox. .033 Ac —ft of storage
O 0 0 0 0
RETAINING N N o
WALL N89 °24'00 "E �'6
FND PRM
H
PROP. /'
C*
Cell 48 hours
UD
r
a n 31.83'
before you dig
,.
0 a_ \8
Ina cn 1
-i t-I.s•
Ifs the Lawl
r r
r•.r ...a
zD
1400432 -4770
S—hh. SM. On.
C.S .t FWdd., Inn
O
N
rya•
LEGEND
- - -V --
EXISTING WATER LINE
— �4 - -V --
EXISTING GATE VALVE
■
PROPOSED PIPE AND CATCH BASIN
®
PROPOSED GRADE
t
DIRECTION OF FLAW
-SO C)
SD— EXISTING PIPE AND INLET
R.r "'"
EXISTING GRADE
— - -S —
— EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
SIDEWALK TO BE
YMIAR FABRIC"
O 7H
TED WITH
2' -D•
•_.-
R OADWAY ADWAT
SECTION
R.resca
DIY b•
M1 F
9� 1 �
CONST. INLET NO. 1
TYPE "[I "
GRATE = 10.80'
INV = 7.05
CONST. INLET NO. 1
TYPE " II "
GRATE = 16.00'
INV = 7.05
1. 2'
O
O
O
O
r—
O
O
0
O
O
z
Provide Water Quality Treatment:
Greater of the following: (A) Store the first inch for the entire site or
(B) The amount of 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness
(A) Volume = 1in. x .3208 ac. x 1/12 = .03 ac —ft
(B) Volume = 2.5 in. x (Impervious Area / Site Area) x (Total Area / 12) = .025 Ac— ft
Total Required Water Quality = 0.03 oc —ft
Water Quality Provided by 80' of Exfiltrtation Trench Which Provides aprox. .033 Ac —ft of storage
O 0 0 0 0
RETAINING N N o
WALL N89 °24'00 "E �'6
FND PRM
H
d
w
PROPOSED
POOL
O
11
PROP.TRELLIS
J, R
PROPOSED
DECK
Ln V
0
N
O
oRECEIVEQ•
FF3 15 2007
Town of Gulf Strum, Fi
O W
O 5
140.007 CHAIN LINK FENCE 1pI "
10'
_'2'-S PROPOSFn w
DRIVE Q
22.67'
t`
c0
r7
1.000
)� O
3.50'
N PROPOSED �O }
2 STORY O
RESIDENCE �° w
W /BASEMENT 3.50'
IN. FLR.= 26.15
L. ti�6.63' F_.01'-2
13.33' ro 2\, n
`� 4.
20.33'
N
26'0
•
3oloq,0 /S
G 34.17' PROPOSED
DRIVE
PROP.
3'ALUM.FENCE
CHAIN LINK FENCE
FND PRM S89R24'00"W Io
O -� O
w Cn 00
53'0
140.00 WITNESS CORNER j j,
00 FND CONC. O v,
o°D POWER MON J U'
POLE (10.4'W.)
J O
O
In p O
as
in O O
0
Q
>-- O
F— O
z O
D
O
U
Of
z
Q
J
a_
- 0.
PROP. /'
C*
4'ALUM.FENCE
UD
r
a n 31.83'
0
c4�
,.
0 a_ \8
Ina cn 1
-i t-I.s•
s<
r r
r•.r ...a
zD
qr-.s
Zt�
T
O
N
rya•
r4
L 13.33'
ITT,
d
w
PROPOSED
POOL
O
11
PROP.TRELLIS
J, R
PROPOSED
DECK
Ln V
0
N
O
oRECEIVEQ•
FF3 15 2007
Town of Gulf Strum, Fi
O W
O 5
140.007 CHAIN LINK FENCE 1pI "
10'
_'2'-S PROPOSFn w
DRIVE Q
22.67'
t`
c0
r7
1.000
)� O
3.50'
N PROPOSED �O }
2 STORY O
RESIDENCE �° w
W /BASEMENT 3.50'
IN. FLR.= 26.15
L. ti�6.63' F_.01'-2
13.33' ro 2\, n
`� 4.
20.33'
N
26'0
•
3oloq,0 /S
G 34.17' PROPOSED
DRIVE
PROP.
3'ALUM.FENCE
CHAIN LINK FENCE
FND PRM S89R24'00"W Io
O -� O
w Cn 00
53'0
140.00 WITNESS CORNER j j,
00 FND CONC. O v,
o°D POWER MON J U'
POLE (10.4'W.)
J O
O
In p O
as
in O O
0
Q
>-- O
F— O
z O
D
O
U
Of
z
Q
J
a_
- 0.
N.T.S.
LONGITUDINAL VIEW CROSS - SECTION
NOTES;
L THE cwrRAC7M STALL 7AAE NECESSARY IREDAUrmas TD PREVENT
CONTAMIMAT�I OF THE TREIEH " SAXII. SILT. M OVER
NAT E OAL.
e THE CARRACTOR )LAY INS rNl EITHER.
A PERFORATED RCP IN ACCMAVCE VTTH rMT. REINROEIGS.
4 CMMXGATED ALIMNM <PEWORATER) 16 fi
3 No Im PE%DRAnoMS FM TIE FIRST 6 FEET FROM THE INLET M
NAMERE
•. PPE PE%MATUMS SHALL SE 5/16• IDES SPACm AT F 71C
R<o M HOLES PER LDEM Finn.
S SEE DETAus Or MAI.nE ANO/Ot ALEX rM CUISTM)CTDM DETAILS
OF SAME.
6 PLASTIC FRIER FA MW SHALL CON d TO DOT. SEC7110N 9115 M
7. PRIOR 7o RO To EMM4
PZXFIU.bIG DEPARTMENT ANY MALL K NVEN 2RES. THE Cm
fl "m IN G UiR To SwLL SE GNEN 119 MRS
NMICE d Mmt TO scKRLE Ax DKPECnM or THE FACILRT.
N.T.S.
W,F_1^°
TYPE hIV
BIIET -TOP STAB MANHOLE -TOP SLAB
�•>s ••a R•O.�.I
.. .: .•;.,;;144 �y.r:;F'Y.L"F°,%R�.�'.i'R
PRECA51
rR M.
C*
Y r
®
r
r
0
c4�
,.
7S
75'
-i t-I.s•
s<
r r
r•.r ...a
zD
qr-.s
Zt�
T
-i
rya•
r4
^.IT .•.a
R•) =IlF
KK GRATE
w•.r
t
r-r
—
R.r "'"
r
TYPE
'A'
R•resaa
YMIAR FABRIC"
DW
DW .C.
2' -D•
•_.-
S -D•
_A•
SECTION
R.resca
DIY b•
M1 F
J•_D•
4' -1'
-5
N.T.S.
LONGITUDINAL VIEW CROSS - SECTION
NOTES;
L THE cwrRAC7M STALL 7AAE NECESSARY IREDAUrmas TD PREVENT
CONTAMIMAT�I OF THE TREIEH " SAXII. SILT. M OVER
NAT E OAL.
e THE CARRACTOR )LAY INS rNl EITHER.
A PERFORATED RCP IN ACCMAVCE VTTH rMT. REINROEIGS.
4 CMMXGATED ALIMNM <PEWORATER) 16 fi
3 No Im PE%DRAnoMS FM TIE FIRST 6 FEET FROM THE INLET M
NAMERE
•. PPE PE%MATUMS SHALL SE 5/16• IDES SPACm AT F 71C
R<o M HOLES PER LDEM Finn.
S SEE DETAus Or MAI.nE ANO/Ot ALEX rM CUISTM)CTDM DETAILS
OF SAME.
6 PLASTIC FRIER FA MW SHALL CON d TO DOT. SEC7110N 9115 M
7. PRIOR 7o RO To EMM4
PZXFIU.bIG DEPARTMENT ANY MALL K NVEN 2RES. THE Cm
fl "m IN G UiR To SwLL SE GNEN 119 MRS
NMICE d Mmt TO scKRLE Ax DKPECnM or THE FACILRT.
N.T.S.
W,F_1^°
TYPE hIV
BIIET -TOP STAB MANHOLE -TOP SLAB
�•>s ••a R•O.�.I
.. .: .•;.,;;144 �y.r:;F'Y.L"F°,%R�.�'.i'R
PRECA51
rR M.
•.•
Y r
,•
r
r
r
,.
Ir -r
s<
r r
r•.r ...a
n•+r ".'r
qr-.s
r•rcoca
rya•
r4
^.IT .•.a
R•) =IlF
R•r...a
w•.r
r-r
/.Il ...a
R.r "'"
r
T-r
R•resaa
R•r...a
r-r
R.resca
N.T.S.
0
L7 �
�z- s
w -
U z»
ZQa .Mz
XZwoa�
W J EC W
J -,raw
W�wa-I-
Wz,a`P
= = p z P
�ZQM
3. _ ,
W ZO <<3
wuaoe
OJN m
J >Z3 Z
was o
LL
J
U
Q
O
Lc] Q
Q O
111,'
4 0
3 "
O C
O m
U�
� Q
a
PG.
NO. 25471
OF FLORIDA
JOB 4492
SHT.NO.
11 2
OF 2 SHEETS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------- - - - - -_ _� - -_ -`- -- -
�sOJL0Zi
-451 Z�E
jS7- b5
r Hill
Zg �c�g
I I
I I
I
I
I i
I I
I I
! I
I
JsgLS I
`-------------
------------------------ -----------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
z 'd WV 99:11 LOOZ- LZ -83.l
T
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40 !0
( IN FEET )
1 inch a 20 fL
CAULFIELD & WHEELER, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING GULFSTREAM
7301A W. PALMETTO PARK ROAD -SUITE IOOA BOUNDARY SURVEY
(> BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33433
PHONE (561)- 392 -1991 / FAX (561)- 750 -1452
TYPICAL
IF NGF D NOTES
SCALE 1 " =20'
FLD.BK. 434
CHECKED BY JRW
A/C - AIR CONDITIONER
LOW. - LOWEST
FILE NAME 4492SUR
L - ARC LENGTH
M.H. - MANHOLE
2/8/07
DBF
ASPH. - ASPHALT
MEAS- MEASURED
CE
REVISED EXISTING ELEVATIONS
ALUM. - ALUMINUM
MON. - MONUMENT
REVISIONS
I DATE
BLDG, BUILDING
N/T - NAIL k TAB
BLK. - BLOCK
NO. - NUMBER
C k C - CURB AND GUTTER
O.E. - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
C.D. - CATCH BASIN
0/L - ON LINE
C.M.P. - CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
0/S - BUILDING OFFSET
C.O. - CLEANOUT
O.R.B. - OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
CALC. - CALCULATED
P.B. - PLAT BOOK
CAN. -CABLE TELEVISION RISER
P.C. - POINT OF CURVATURE
CBS - CONCRETE BLOCK k S"CO
P :EP.-PERMANENT CONTROL POINT
GONG. - CONCRETE
P.L- POINT OF INTERSECTION
COR. - CORNER
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
GOV. COVERED
P.O.C.- POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
D.E. - DRAINAGE EASEMENT
P�P� - POD P�
E.O.P. - EDGE OF PAVEMENT
E.O.W. - EDGE OF WATER
P.R.M. - PERMANENT REFRENCE
MONUMENT
APPROVED
E T
ELEC. - ELECTRIC
PROP. - PROPOSED
ELEV. _ELEVATION
TNT
P.T. -POINT OF TANGENCY
ESMT - EASEMENT
R - RADIUS
EXIST. -E)aSTING
F.H. - FIRE HYDRANT
R R - RAILROAD
R/W - RIGHT -OF -WAY
APR 13100
F.P.L- FLOPoDA POWER @ LIGHT
RES. - RESIDENTIAL
RGE. - RANGE
FIN. - FINISHED
F _ FLOOR
S.B.T.- SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE
FND. - FOUND
SAN. SECTIIONRY
T OYM OF
G. V. - GATE VALVE
::P. . - PON PIPE
/CAP -IRON R00 k CAP
SO.
T.0 R. - P OF FEET
T.0.8. -TOP OF BANK
■
���
TNT - INTERSECTION
T V - TELEMSIO
i
INV. - INVERT
TNP. - TOWNSHIP
LIGHT POLE
U.E. - UTILITY EASEMENT
CH T
CHATT.- CHATTAHOOCHEE
WM. - WATER METER
1-W.D.D.- LAKE WORTH
DISTRICT
p _ DELTA (CENTRAL ANGLE)
ALUM- ALUMINUM
®- STORM MANHOLE
O SET 5 /e' IR /CAP LB 358:
® - SANITARY MANHOLE
R
E C E I VE D
FEB 15 2007
NOTES: Town of Gulf Stream, FL.
REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SKETCH ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH AN EMBOSSED
SURVEYOR'S SEAL.
LANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHTS —OF —WAY, EASEMENTS, OWNERSHIP,
OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD.
ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF
1929.
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO ASSUMED DATUM.
THE "LAND DESCRIPTION" HEREON IS IN ACCORD WITH THE DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY THE
CLIENT.
UNDERGROUND FOUNDATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED.
FLOOD ZONE: "B "; COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 125109 0001 D; DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1982
(PER THE TOWN OF GULFSTREAM).
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4110 COUNTY ROAD, GULFSTREAM, FLORIDA 33483 -7512.
DESCRIPTION:
THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 34, AT A DISTANCE OF 805.43 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE,
NORTHERLY FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 34, 100 FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34, 140 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHERLY, PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 34, 100 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 34, 140 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID LANDS SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF GULFSTREAM, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 13,972 SQUARE FEET / 0.3208 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, COVENANTS, AND RIGHTS —OF —WAY OF
RECORD.
CERTIFICATE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED
PROPERTY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS SURVEYED
UNDER MY DIRECTION ON JULY 15, 2003. 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY
MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 611317 -6 ADOPTED BY
THE FLORIDA BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES
472.027.
JEFFREY R. WAGNER, P.L.S.
REG. LAND SURVEYOR #5302
STATE OF FLORIDA
LB #3591
DATE 7/15/03
SCALE 1 " =20'
FLD.BK. 434
CHECKED BY JRW
PAGE 33 -35
FILE NAME 4492SUR
ADDED TOPO
2/8/07
DBF
PERMIT SKETCH
2/5/07
CE
REVISED EXISTING ELEVATIONS
8/9/03
BJF
REVISIONS
I DATE
BY
DATE 7/15/03
SCALE 1 " =20'
FLD.BK. 434
CHECKED BY JRW
PAGE 33 -35
FILE NAME 4492SUR
4492
SHT.NO.
1
OF 1 SHEETS
% �N DD
H_ , \-N (c - J
TOWN OF Gn..J1L,!F S'I'Re.,i,Sbf
NOM,
I. CONSTRUCTION SHALL FOLLOW 'FAC2004' AS ADOPTED BY THE COUNTY AND AS
APPLICABLE TO THE AREA IN WHICH THE BUILDING IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH ALL
APPLICABLE AMDIDMENTS,
T. BUILDER SHOULD COORDINATE ALL THE WORK OF ALL THE TRADES.
S. BUILDER, SUBCONTRACTOR, SUPPLIER, ETC. SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS,
CONDITIONS AT YA SITE, PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC. PRIOR TO STARTING ANY
WORK AND WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF BUILDER'S RECEIPT OF THESE
PLANS SMALL NOTIFY THE MMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL (IN WRITING ONLY) OF ANY
AND ALL DISCREPANCIES (WHETHER DISCREPANCIES ARE ERRORS OF COMMISSION OR
OMISSION OR NOT)- OTHERWISE THE MMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL WILL NOT ASSUME
ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, AND THE BUILDER, SUBCONTRACTOR,
SUPPLIER, ETC. SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY ERRORS AND CORRECT
ERRORS AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE
4. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY THESE PLANS AS DRAWN AND NOTED,
COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING ENVELOPE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA MODEL
ENERGY CODE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE GOVERNING CODE
IN fT'S ENTIRELY AMID WILD IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE
144104 MAY BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS AND NOTES.
S. SITE WOR1G FILL UNDER ALL SLA55 SHALL BE CLEAN SAND AND SMALL BE
COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF ^ISII AND A MAXIMUM DENSITY AS PER ASTM 0-557,
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY UNDER COMPACTION, ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE
25W P.S.F. MIN.
i. WOOD. ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER TO BE DOUGLAS FIR -LARCH NO2 OR BETTER ALL
LUMBER IN CONTACT WITH MASONRY SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED, SHOP DRAWINGS
AND DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF TRUSSES BEARING THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL
OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED ENGINEER SHUN. 15E SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR
APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION.
7. DOORS AND WINDOWS, WINDOWS INDICATED WITH (E) MUST BE MANUFACTURED TO
CONFORM WITH THE BUILDING CODE WITH RESPECT TO MINIMUM EMERGENCY EGRESS
REQUIREMENTS, ALL SLIDING GLASS DOORS SHALL BE TEMPERED. ALL WNNDO S AND
DOORS SHALL BE CAULKED AND WEATHER STRIPPED. WINDOW UNITS SHALL DISPLAY
LABELS COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE MODEL CODE SECTION SMA. WINDOW AND
DOUR MANUFACTURERS SWILL ALSO COORDINATE WITH BUILDER FIELD VERIFY ALL
OPENING SIZES PRIOR TO FABRICATION,
S. THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL. RESERVES, MAINTAINS AND RETAINS IT'S
COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT RIGHTS AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS (EXPRESSED
AND /IMPLIED) IN THESE PLANS, DESIGNS, IDEAS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC. THESE
PLANS, IDEAS, DESIL2N5, ETC ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, COPIED,
DUPLICATED, ETC. IN WHOLE OR IN PART WIA UT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN
PERMISSION FROM THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL NOR ARE THEY TO BE
LOANED OR ASSIGNED TO ANY PETZ_°OK9, FIRMS, ASSOCIATIONS, CORPORATIONS,
ETC. WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE AMES DESIGN
INTERNATIONAL, IN EACH AND EVERY INSTANCE.
E ANY CHANGES, REVISIONS ALTERATIONS, ETC REQUIRED TO THESE PLANS,
DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC. SMALL BE REQUESTED IN WRITING ONLY BY THE
BUILDER OR BY THE OWNER TO THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL ANY CHANGFJ',
REVISIONS, ALTERATIONS, DEVIATIONS, ETC. NOT MADE 87 THE AMES DESIGN
INTERNATIONAL (IN WRITING ONLY) WILL FULLY, UNYOND,n.MT AND TOTALLY
RELEASE THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL FROM ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY,
CLAIMS AGAINST THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL FOR CULPABILITY, ETC FROM
THE DATE SHOWN ON THE PLANS ORIGIN UNTIL THE END OF TIME
10. BUILDER SHALL PROVIDE INSULATION AS PER ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND /OR
PLAN SPECIFICATIONS.
II. ALL MATERIALS SHOWN OR CARED FOR ON THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE
INSTALLED W17H MANUFACTURERS RECOMMEND AND SPECIFICATIONS.
12. APPROVED MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANY DETAILS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOUND IN THESE PLANS. DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND NOTES MIST CONFORM TO LOCAL BUILDING CODE
REOUREMENTS. AND MUST BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION
IS. NO ONE SHALL ASSUME ANY DIMENSION BY DIRECTLY SCALING CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS OR ANY REPRODUCTIONS AND SAME IF ANY ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS
ARE REQUIRED BY CONTRACTOR AND /OR RESIDENT, CONTACT THE AMES DESIGN
INTERNATIONAL FOR VERIFICATION. OTHERWISE, THE MMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
WILL NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY ERROR NOR WILL THEY CORRECT
ANY ERROR AT THEIR EXPENSE.
N. ALL WINDOWS USED AS EMERGENCY EGRESS OPENING TO COMPLY WITH F.B.C.
2004
$5. ALL SHOWER ENCLOSURES AND DOORS TO HAVE TEMPERED GLASS,
Ii. ALL SLIDING GLASS DOORS TO 14AVE TEMPERED GLASS.
17. GLAZING CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL GLASS IN ACCORDANCE WITH F.B.0
2004
IS. ALL EXTERIOR FIXED GLASS (EXCEPT AT WINDOWS) AND ALL INTERIOR FIXED
GLASS SMALL HAVE TEMPERED GLASS.
FL ALL SHOWERS MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH ANTI -SCALE FAUCETS
9�
2�
#s
zo
ri
W _a
lA
Z p 0
W J LL
0) t 5
W °o
cc z Z o°
o °
n
Q
/ oM.► 1
k WW Rom Ni0
'^ !�T
fit
CS-1
8
. t I
i
ME II
Banyin 964
p
0; �A
L_ � 0
2006
Town of Gulf Stream, FL
LO
O
M
co
ZNOO
LL
uj
<
Lu (D
f V
J'Al
0; �A
L_ � 0
2006
Town of Gulf Stream, FL
COON RESIDENCE/ ' 411 O COUNTY ROAD L07.5
GULFSTREAI" 1, FLORIDA 334BB
70NN OF GULF 571REA1„1 517E
DATA TABLE
GROSS LOT AREA
13, 970
S.F.
EFECTIVE LOT AREA
S.F.
12,970
S.F.
S.F.
GARAGE
1,47(o
S. F.
FLOOR AREAS PROPOSED
4/753
S. F.
FIRST FLOOR
BASEMENT (AREA EXEMPT)
3,277
S.F.
CEILING OVER 15'
ROOFED VERANDA
0
S.F.
let FLOOR LIVING
25
2,976
S.F.
CEILING OVER 15'
0
S.F.
2nd FLOOR LIVING
FRONT DECK (OPEN)
1,072
S.F.
TOTAL LIVING
353
41046
S.F.
let FLOOR COVERED
346
S.F.
let FLOOR COVERED - EXEMPTION
TOTAL UNDER ROOF
115
S.F.
let FLOOR COVERED ACTUAL
231
S.F.
2nd FLOOR COVERED
0
S.F.
TOTAL COVERED
231
S.F.
GARAGE
1,47(o
S.F.
GROSS FLOOR AREA
41279
S. F.
F.A.R. CALCULATIONS
FIRST 20/000 x .33(ALLONABLE F.A.R.)
41 280
S.F.
OVER 20,000 x .20(ALLONABLE F.A.R.)
0
S.F.
TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA
41 280
S. F.
FLOOR AREA PROVIDED
4127q
S. F.
TOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA
MIN. REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
AREA (40% OF 12,970 S.F. LOT AREA)
51188
S.F.
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA
5/241
S.F.
MIN. REQUIRED FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE
AREA (40% OF FRONT YARD AREA)
11200
S.F.
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA
1, 559
S.F.
1ST FLR. TO 2ND FLR. ALLOWABLE
0.75
(FRINGE DISTRICT)
GIVEN (1072 S.F. / 297(o S.F.)
0.36
REQUESTING OPEN PORCH EXEMPTION
346 S.F. / 3 = 115.33 S.F. (MAX. 300 S.F. EXEMPTION)
AREA CALCU LA71 ON5
BASEMENT FLOOR
AIR CONDITIONED AREA
257
S.F.
STORAGE
3/020
S.F.
GARAGE
1,47(o
S. F.
TOTAL BASEMENT
4/753
S. F.
FIRST FLOOR
AIR CONDITIONED AREA
2,976
S.F.
ROOFED VERANDA
336
S.F.
COVERED ENTRY
25
S. F.
SECOND FLOOR
AIR CONDITIONED AREA
953
S.F.
FRONT DECK (OPEN)
107
S.F.
REAR BALCONY (OPEN)
353
S.F.
TOTAL AIR CONDITIONED AREA
4,301
S.F.
TOTAL UNDER ROOF
3.342
S.F.
&A&
kj- 51
K
' ZQn 777
RETAINING � 0
WALL N89� 4 ',(jO"E �
a
40.00 CHAIN LINK
1.25'
PAGE 33 -35
A/C - AIR CONDITIONER
LOW. - LOWEST
L - ARC LENGTH
M.H. - MANHOLE
DSF
F PRM
ASPH. - ASPHALT
MEAS- MEASURED
PROP.
4'ALUM.FENCE
8/9/03
ROPOSED
MON. - MONUMENT
DATE
m
BLDG. BUILDING
d w 31.
DRIVE
BLK. - BLOCK
NO. - NUMBER
w
vS 7 y
O.E. - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
O
C.B. - CATCH BASIN
O7 - ON LINE
R
22.87
-I
D/S - BUILDING OFFSET
O PROP.TRELLr
C.O. - CLEANOUT
16
,3.33'
O
r
PORCH
p
CATV. -CABLE TELEVISION RISER
PL.
1.00.0
/
CBS - CONCRETE BLOCK 6 STUCCO
PCP PERMANENT CONTROL POINT
p"15 ryh
CONC. _ CONCRETE
COR. - CORNER
P.L- PO T OF INTERSECTION
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINMNG
7 .
COV COV17tED
a
PROPOSED
—
3.
LiJ
-
ELEC. ELECTRIC
ELEV. - ELLyATION
PROPOSED a
DECK i
j,I
I
1 PR POOED 58
O
O
F.H. -FIRE HYDRANT
F.H. - E HYDRANT
POOL F
���
F
3.50
o
FlN. - FINISHED
RGE. - RANGE
J
D. _FLOOR
WRESIDENCE
3
0 1
0
SEC - SECTION
S < O
a 3
G.Y. -GATE VALVE
I.P. - WON PIPE
SD. FT. - SQUARE FEET
T.0.EL - 70P OF BANK GULF
GULF S
C 0
I.R. /CAP -IRON ROO 8 CAP
O
<
0
��
TNT - INTERSECTION
TWP. - TOWNSHIP
1.DO.
INV. - INVERT
LP. UCHT POLE
z
T
CW.D.D.
W M
WM. - WATER METER
A _ DELTA (CENTRAL ANGLE)
,3.33' o
L
LAKE WORTH
1-W.D.D.-LAKE WORTH
ALUM- ALUMINUM
a
Q
DRAINAGE DISTRICT
�a -D
o u
PR PORCH SJ o, 34.17 PROPOSED
PROP.
CHAIN LINK FENCE
3VALUM.FENCE it
FND PRM S89*24' DO" W 117.o WITNESS CORNER
0 0 0 0 o FND CONC.
w N $ N m POWER MON
POLE (10.4'W.)
DD
0
SA
m
SOUTH LINE SECTION
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40 m
( IN FEET )
1 inch - 2D fL
CAULFIELD 81 WHEELER, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING GULFSTREAM
301A W. PALMETTO PARK ROAD -SUITE IOOA BOUNDARY SURVEY
(AT/
BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33433
PHONE (561)- 392 -1991 / FAX (560- 750 -1452
REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SKETCH ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH AN EMBOSSED
SURVEYOR'S SEAL.
LANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHTS -OF -WAY, EASEMENTS, OWNERSHIP,
OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD.
ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF
1929.
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO ASSUMED DATUM.
THE "LAND DESCRIPTION" HEREON IS IN ACCORD WITH THE DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY THE
CLIENT.
UNDERGROUND FOUNDATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED.
FLOOD ZONE: "B "; COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 125109 0001 D; DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1982
(PER THE TOWN OF GULFSTREAM).
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4110 COUNTY ROAD, GULFSTREAM, FLORIDA 33483 -7512.
DESCRIPTION:
THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 34, AT A DISTANCE OF 805.43 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE,
NORTHERLY FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 34, 100 FEET:
THENCE WESTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34, 140 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHERLY, PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 34, 100 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 34, 140 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID LANDS SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF GULFSTREAM, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 13,972 SQUARE FEET / 0.3208 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, COVENANTS, AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF
RECORD.
CERTIFICATE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED
PROPERTY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS SURVEYED
UNDER MY DIRECTION ON JULY 15, 2003_ 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY
MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61G17 -6 ADOPTED BY
THE FLORIDA BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES
472.027.
JEFFREY R. WAGNER, P.L.S.
REG. LAND SURVEYOR #5302
STATE OF FLORIDA
LB #3591
TYPICAL
LEGEND NOTES
FLD.BK. 434
CHECKED BY JRW
PAGE 33 -35
A/C - AIR CONDITIONER
LOW. - LOWEST
L - ARC LENGTH
M.H. - MANHOLE
DSF
PERMIT SKETCH
ASPH. - ASPHALT
MEAS- MEASURED
REVISED EXISTING ELEVATIONS
8/9/03
ALUM. - ALUMINUM
MON. - MONUMENT
DATE
BY
BLDG. BUILDING
N/T - NAIL k TAB
BLK. - BLOCK
NO. - NUMBER
C k G - CURB AND CUTTER
O.E. - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
C.B. - CATCH BASIN
O7 - ON LINE
C.M.P.- CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
D/S - BUILDING OFFSET
C.O. - CLEANOUT
O.R.B. - OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
GALC. - CALCULATED
P.B. - PLAT BOOK
p
CATV. -CABLE TELEVISION RISER
P.C. - POINT OF CURVATURE
CBS - CONCRETE BLOCK 6 STUCCO
PCP PERMANENT CONTROL POINT
p"15 ryh
CONC. _ CONCRETE
COR. - CORNER
P.L- PO T OF INTERSECTION
P.O.B. - POINT OF BEGINMNG
COV COV17tED
P.O.C.- POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
10,
D.E. - DRAINAGE EASEMENT
E.O.P. - -EDGE OF PAVEMENT
E.D.W. EDGE OF WATER
P.P. - POWER POLE
MONU
P.R.M. - PERMANENT REFRENCE APPROVED,
ET
-
ELEC. ELECTRIC
ELEV. - ELLyATION
POOPMENT
P.T. -POINT . - PROPO O SED TANGENCY
ESMT. - EASEMENT
RAPAILROAD
F.H. -FIRE HYDRANT
F.H. - E HYDRANT
R.R.
R/W - RIGHT -OF -WAY APR 13 200
F.P.L- FLORIDA POWER 8 LIGHT
RES. - RESIDENTIAL
FlN. - FINISHED
RGE. - RANGE
J
D. _FLOOR
S.B.T.- SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE
SAN. - SANITARY
Q } O
SEC - SECTION
S < O
a 3
G.Y. -GATE VALVE
I.P. - WON PIPE
SD. FT. - SQUARE FEET
T.0.EL - 70P OF BANK GULF
GULF S
C 0
I.R. /CAP -IRON ROO 8 CAP
f11G/'��
T.V. - TELEVISION
<
0
��
TNT - INTERSECTION
TWP. - TOWNSHIP
r
INV. - INVERT
LP. UCHT POLE
UF_ - UTILITY EASEMENT
T
CW.D.D.
W M
WM. - WATER METER
A _ DELTA (CENTRAL ANGLE)
ry1
LAKE WORTH
1-W.D.D.-LAKE WORTH
ALUM- ALUMINUM
Q
DRAINAGE DISTRICT
Q
®- STORM MANHOLE
O SET 5/8' IR /CAP LB 3581
° 3
®- SANITARY MANHOLE
• ECEIVED•
0
zo
Z
FEB 15 2007
O
Z)
C) 0
Town of Gulf Stream,
NOTES:
FL
REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SKETCH ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH AN EMBOSSED
SURVEYOR'S SEAL.
LANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHTS -OF -WAY, EASEMENTS, OWNERSHIP,
OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD.
ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF
1929.
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO ASSUMED DATUM.
THE "LAND DESCRIPTION" HEREON IS IN ACCORD WITH THE DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY THE
CLIENT.
UNDERGROUND FOUNDATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED.
FLOOD ZONE: "B "; COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 125109 0001 D; DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1982
(PER THE TOWN OF GULFSTREAM).
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4110 COUNTY ROAD, GULFSTREAM, FLORIDA 33483 -7512.
DESCRIPTION:
THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 34, AT A DISTANCE OF 805.43 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE,
NORTHERLY FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 34, 100 FEET:
THENCE WESTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 34, 140 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHERLY, PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 34, 100 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 34, 140 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID LANDS SITUATE IN THE TOWN OF GULFSTREAM, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 13,972 SQUARE FEET / 0.3208 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, COVENANTS, AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF
RECORD.
CERTIFICATE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED
PROPERTY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS SURVEYED
UNDER MY DIRECTION ON JULY 15, 2003_ 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY
MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61G17 -6 ADOPTED BY
THE FLORIDA BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES
472.027.
JEFFREY R. WAGNER, P.L.S.
REG. LAND SURVEYOR #5302
STATE OF FLORIDA
LB #3591
DATE 7/15/03
SCALE 1 " =20'
FLD.BK. 434
CHECKED BY JRW
PAGE 33 -35
FILE NAME 4492SUR
ADDED TOPO
2/8/07
DSF
PERMIT SKETCH
2/5/07
CE
REVISED EXISTING ELEVATIONS
8/9/03
B.F
REVISIONS
DATE
BY
DATE 7/15/03
SCALE 1 " =20'
FLD.BK. 434
CHECKED BY JRW
PAGE 33 -35
FILE NAME 4492SUR
4492
SHT.ND.
1
OF 1 SHEETS
8� n.r.lo�a. LILY
I iE
I
I
I
I
i1 I I
� I � � IOW Z mom
-
h1l
0 0 bliz
I_ — __ ___ - 1110
- _- _L I e
-------=-------------------- �_r- -�---------
- --� -- Z------------- - - - - -- _ S
---- - - - - -I r--- - - - - --
IE31E31 I IE�II IIEI I I I
IE311 I IIE31 I I I
IE31E31 I I I IE31F- -ilE31 I I I
I €9I €9I I I I I €III II €�I I I I'
IE31E31 I I I IE311 I IIE31 I I I¢ Z W p
o I I I L�N°I i I Lo ���111c) 0 Ec
I I I I j j I— Q
I u l W J LL
PIP Qw�
03 Ir z
� J uj �-_�U
r'� Q z Z `J` x
D 1115 -
=01 ;Q
!0 n
lilLu 0 t
r
� V a
TOWN (OF GULF STREAM
610CRAL NoTm
1. CONSTRUCTION SMALL FO LOW 'FE.200P
,C AS ADOPTED BY THE COUNTY AND AS
APPLICABLE TO THE AREA M WHICH THE AS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH ALL
APPLICABLE AMENDMENTS.
2. BUILDER SHOULD COORDINATE ALL THE WORK OF ALL THE TRADES.
S. BUILDER, SUBCONTRACTOR, SUPPLIER, ETC. SMALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS,
CONDITIONS AT .CAB SITE, PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC PRIOR TO STARTING ANY
WORK AND WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF BUILDER% RECEIPT OF THESE
PLANS SHALL NOTIFY THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL (IN WRITING ONLY) OF ANY
AND ALL DISCREPANCIES (WHETHER DISCREPANCIES ARE ERRORS OF COMMISSION OR
OMISSION OR NOT). armm1JISE THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL WILL NOT ASSUME
ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, AND THE BUILDER, SUBCONTRACTOR,
SUPPLIER, ETC. SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY ERRORS AND CORRECT
ERRORS AT THEIR OMAN EXPENSE
4. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY THESE PLANS AS DRAM AND NOTED,
COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING ENVELOPE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA MODEL
ENERGY CODE, CONTRACTOR SMALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE GOVERNING CODE
IN " ENTIRELY AND BUILD IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE
/44104 MAY BE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS AND NOTES.
6. 3T1'E WORK, FILL UNDER ALL SIAHS SHALL BE CLEAN SAND AND SMALL BE
COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 'Mai AND A MAXIMUM DENSITY AS PER ASTM 11-557,
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY UNDER COMPACTION. ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE
2500 P.S.F. MIN.
S. WOOD, ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER TO BE DON:LAS FIR -LARCH NO.2 OR BETTER ALL
LUMBER IN CONTACT WITH MASONRY SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. SHOP DRAWINGS
AND DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF TRUSSES BEARING THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL
OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED ENGINEM SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR
APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION.
7. DOORS AND WINDOW& WINDOWS INDICATED WITH (E) MUST BE MANUFAGTURm TO
CONFORM WITH THE BUILDING CODE WITH RESPECT TO MINIMUM EMERGENCY EGRESS
REQUIREMENTS. ALL SLIDING GLASS DOORS SHALL BE TEMPERED. ALL WINDOWS AND
DOORS SHALL BE CAULKED AND WEATHER STRIPPED. WINDOW UNITS SHALL DISPLAY
LABELS COMPLUNCE WITH FLORIDA STATE MODEL CODE SECTNON 502A. WINDOW AND
DOOR MANUFACTURERS SMALL ALSO COORDINATE WITH BUILDER FIELD VERIFY ALL
OPENING SIZES PRIOR TO FABRICATION,
S. THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL RESERVES, MAINTAINS AND RETAINS IT'S
COf7t10N LAW COPYWGHT RIGHTS AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS (EXPRESSED
ANDAMPLIED) IN THESE PLANS DESIGNS, IDEAS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC. THESE
PLANS, IDEAS, DESIGNS, ETC ARE NOT TO HE REPRODUCED, COPIED,
DUPLICATED, ETC IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN
PERMISSION FROM THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL NOR ARE THEY TO BE
LOANED OR ASSIGNED TO ANY PERSONS, FIRMS, ASSOCIATIONS, CORPORATIONS,
ETC. WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE AMES DESIGN
INTERNATIONAL, IN EACH AND EVERY INSTANCE
ANY CHANGES, REVSIOS ALTERATIONS, ETC. REQUIRED TO THESE PLANS,
DRAWINGSS, SPEC7FICATOfIB, ETC. 5F14LL BE REQUESTED IN WRITING ONLY BY THE
BUILDER OR DY THE OEU11'R TO THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL ANY CHANGES,
REVISIONS, ALTERATIONS, DEVIATIONS, ETC NOT MADE BY THE AMES DESIGN
INTERNATIONAL (IN WRITING ONLY) WILL FULLY, UNCONDITIONALLY AND TOTALLY
RELEASE THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL FROM ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY,
CLAIMS AGAINST THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL FOR CULPABILITY, ETC. FROM
THE DATE SHOW ON THE PLANS ORIGIN UNTIL THE END OF TIME
10. BUILDER SMALL PROVIDE INSULATION AS PER ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND/OR
PLAN SPECIFICATIONS.
11. ALL MATERIALS SHOWN OR CALLED FOR ON THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE
INSTALLED WITH MANUFACTURERS RECOMMEND AND SPECIFICATIONS.
12. APPROVED MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANT DETAILS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOUND IN THESE PLANS. DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND NOTES MUST CONFORM TO LOCAL BUILDING CODE
REQUIREMENTS. AND MUST BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION
B. NO ONE SHALL AND ANY DIMENSION BY DIRECTLY SCALING CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS OR ANY REPRODUCTIONS AND SAME IF ANY ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS
ARE REQUIRED BY CONTRACTOR AND/OR RESIDENT, CONTACT THE AMES DESIGN
INTERNATIONAL FOR VERIFICATION. OTHERWISE, THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
WILL NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY ERROR NOR WILL THEY CORRECT
ANY ERROR AT THEIR EXPENSE.
N. ALL WINDOWS USED AS EMERGENCY EGRESS OPENING TO COMPLY WITH F.H.L.
2004
4S. ALL SHOWER ENCLOSURES AND DOORS TO NAVE TEMPERED GLASS.
Ii. ALL SLIDING GLASS DOORS TO NAVE TEMPERED GLASS.
IT. GLAZING CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL GLASS IN ACCORDANCE WITH F.B.0
2004
IS . ALL EXTERIOR FIXED GLASS (EXCEPT AT WINDOWS) AND ALL INTERIOR FIXED
GLASS SHALL HAVE TEMPERED GLASS.
IQ ALL SHOWERS MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH ANT -SCALE FAUCETS
I..i�
O
O
'
I..E
M
M
C)
O
Ln
T�
-J
o NA
MY NAME
oFtaO®
TODAY
WA57Ci
PES
�1 MY
0
cs _ l
I..i�
O
O
'
I..E
M
M
C)
O
Ln
T�
-J
Jj'Wcqj'S;jnE);o UlAoi
T
OCZT—i
C)
O
Z
A
rn
Om
Z
)U 0 r-
2u c
z
—i -u
rn�D
cm
>1
*+
an up K+.c-
mi m
rT
IN
+"u YRAUI !G
�c T
rr
re
0
o
cl)
c= Cg�
L
0
GULFSTR5A1 1, FLORIDA 33483
TOWN OF GULF STRFAI"I S 1 TE
DATA TABLE
GROSS LOT AREA
13, 970
S.F.
EFECTIVE LOT AREA
S.F.
12,970
S.F.
S.F.
GARAGE
1,47(o
S. F.
FLOOR AREAS PROPOSED
4,753
S.F.
FIRST FLOOR
BASEMENT (AREA EXEMPT)
3,277
S.F.
CEILING OVER 15'
ROOFED VERANDA
0
S.F.
1st FLOOR LIVING
25
2,976
S.F.
CEILING OVER 15'
0
S.F.
2nd FLOOR LIVING
FRONT DECK (OPEN)
1,072
S.F.
TOTAL LIVING
353
41046
S.F.
1st FLOOR COVERED
346
S.F.
1st FLOOR COVERED - EXEMPTION
TOTAL UNDER ROOF
115
S.F.
1st FLOOR COVERED ACTUAL
231
S.F.
2nd FLOOR COVERED
0
S.F.
TOTAL COVERED
231
S.F.
GARAGE
1, 476
S. F.
GROSS FLOOR AREA
4/279
S.F.
F.A.R. CALCULATIONS
FIRST 20,000 x .33(ALLONABLE F.A.R.)
4,280
S.F.
OVER 20,000 x .20(ALLONABLE F.A.R.)
0
S.F.
TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA
4/260
S.F.
FLOOR AREA PROVIDED
41279
S.F.
TOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA
MIN. REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
AREA (40% OF 12/970 S.F. LOT AREA)
5,188
S.F.
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA
5,241
S.F.
MIN. REQUIRED FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE
AREA (40% OF FRONT YARD AREA)
1, 200
S.F.
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA
1, 559
S.F.
1ST FLR. TO 2ND FLR. ALLOWABLE
0.75
(FRINGE DISTRICT)
GIVEN (1072 S.F. / 297(o S.F.)
0.36
REQUESTING OPEN PORCH EXEMPTION
346 S.F. / 3 = 115.33 S.F. (MAX. 300 S.F. EXEMPTION)
AR EA CA LC U LAT 1 ON S
BASEMENT FLOOR
AIR CONDITIONED AREA
257
S.F.
STORAGE
31020
S.F.
GARAGE
1,47(o
S. F.
TOTAL BASEMENT
4,753
S.F.
FIRST FLOOR
AIR CONDITIONED AREA
2,976
S.F.
ROOFED VERANDA
336
S.F.
COVERED ENTRY
25
S. F.
SECOND FLOOR
AIR CONDITIONED AREA
953
S.F.
FRONT DECK (OPEN)
107
S.F.
REAR BALCONY (OPEN)
353
S.F.
TOTAL AIR CONDITIONED AREA
4,301
S.F.
TOTAL UNDER ROOF
3/342
S. F.
K
K
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
1
I
II
_ I
O
LO
� O
7 Qm
w OC()
w (Y m
� Q
� zQ
� 00
w ULL
4 O
W Q
Q LULLI
U
Q W�
Q LL
LO D
W l'3
Z
Z 0
LL-
O O
� U
Q
w
a
w
IL
Q
U
N
Q
Z
4
i
i
I
I
I
I
Q
LLI
iY
4
1�
•
•
F-
LL
4�
011-
�m
�4
zQ
� (Y
0
ULL
4
w�
U�
w�
QLL
W
LLI
U
I
u OL
LLI
Q �
� o
D z
LLI
z
o +-
� Q
Q o
z v
0
U iY
� 4
4 z0
z
i
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
C4-
In
I
CC)
t-
I
I
I
L
i
I .
i
i
I
I
I
I
Q
LLI
iY
4
1�
•
•
F-
LL
4�
011-
�m
�4
zQ
� (Y
0
ULL
4
w�
U�
w�
QLL
W
LLI
U
I
u OL
LLI
Q �
� o
D z
LLI
z
o +-
� Q
Q o
z v
0
U iY
� 4
4 z0
z
I I
I '
� I
I I
I I
I I
I �
Q
' � w
O
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
LO
LL
I
-J
mill
Qm
O,;T
m
w
a
iY
I
00
(J)
Q
LL
Q
w
z
O
wL
w
o
UV
v
fy-
Z�-
w
Q
Uw
o
-J
W
z
w
w
Z
O
U
I I
I I
I4-
' CC)
I � Ii
i
I I
I I
I I
I
' n
C4- Qq
N I
m
I
I � �
�9 I
N
I I
I I
� I
I
I
I
w
4
f-
z
w
4
to
O
J
Qm
Oco
�m
?- 4
I- Q
D r/
00
0
�r 4
ww
U�
W�
Q�
-J
(Y �
O
O
U
I
I 31dh 1V13W
Io_ 3/�Il'd21073a
o WOWS M3N
I S2131d °o
IH IM ,5 M3N N
I
I
fl13S I
)LLVd
I
d 'IH ,b
1fl13S f n0-
9AINO I
I
I
1
t
/ I
I
1
I
I
rn
z I
� I
tJ
�P.
O�
m I
O � I
Nc�
V' „0 -,01
d
rn
rn
o�
AO H1aIM
I
I
I
I
I
I
C lC
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
�131Nb'ld
Ggt7 GG dal�0-1 'wd3�!i1S�-In,�D
S 101 OVOZ� ).1NnoD o� lt7 '3DN3Q IS3Z! NooD
„O- ,I -XZ£ /£ alv:)s
NV-I,:4 2 IS
.l1Nno:) 'N
,00'001 M ,00,00.£os
N
o_ - lb'MayOa 31�Yh 'I'd13W
to llb HdSy,S'bl \ 3/U1'dNO73a
M%IH M3N
-r -- ------ - - -�°�
A
Z
-1 W
N o
1
6
9NI�I�Idd ?1Vo
'ro`r oo'SZ
a� •,n .r
&0,
'9Z
I
O to go
�N
I I
r —T-
I
roN Ad-WOND i«10-13e ,00'b1- NOO -1A HjANI=l; tStMO-1
1 A 1 1 1 1 1 111 e 1 1 A l l l l N 111 l u l l
L1 11L1J� l e l l l l l l l p 1111111
1 1 I I I A I I I I I I I I I I I g 1 1 1 Y 1 1 1
1 I I I I O tl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 tl 1 1 A X 1 1 1
A A l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A l l l p 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 I I A l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1
+1- 4 +F4 - 1- 1- 4 +11- 4 +11-4 + r
IF �I +A # +t--1
- A- 1- r1Tr-l-rr�- rr��r�TriTr-A-r�
\ \-------------------------- Q.
X)2(3 N3d0
Nv:)
9Z
VM3ARla
O- Ftla1NT
„0 -,ZI
'--, C%
0
9
Ng.LNd'ld
*' 'H ,b
1
dM
LV--
° ,8'£I
— —
I
VM3ARla
O- Ftla1NT
„0 -,ZI
'--, C%
0
9
Ng.LNd'ld
�I7b'fl1
73a /OIl
�IO`dfl13E
.l`dM3/�I21C
I
I
37N3d 'WI
I Q
I
I
I $Sz
I/- -37N3d '1
I —x
O
Lo, ll Z
3als I �e O
a Z
+ rn
I
I o_
1
a�
rn
rn �
I rn
I
.- ______ - - -- - - -- I
M-- I
m I
O
;u
- (n -
m 1 I
0.
--
100'001 3 „OO,OO.EON - - -- — --
X)aG "1008
100,1311 =
--- --
q II II II II II II II II
II II X II II II X II II
= II II q N q N 1 I p
II II II p N N N N N
II
---1
(sNgH10 .l9)
N II N II II 11 X II II
11 H 11 11 11 It it
)10313 7008 i IM4
II II 11 N N N N N N
H H H H
II q I N 11 q II II
d
II II H N H
II 11 N N N N N N q
X N N n
II II II II N
n0- ,ob
II II I II 11 ,11111 I
II II I j 1
II II II II II N N N X
II II II II II II II II II
II II II N II u II X N
I
II II II II X q II II
I I 1
II II II 1 II II II II II
11 II II 11 II q p N X
II 11 II N II II N II N
I
II II II II 11 II II
II Iu I
II II II q N N N X X
I
nq g q u Y ll
n
-1008 3ha3 hNI2l'd3dd'dS10
nnuNXNNNN
1
I
I 11 I 11 II 11 II II II
II II II q q II 11 II I
I
II II II II 11 11 X II II
II II II d N H II q II
I
II II II II II II N II II
II II II II 11 N q I II
L 0u0u00uuu uuutluNtlu
-- ----- -L-, -___ I
�I7b'fl1
73a /OIl
�IO`dfl13E
.l`dM3/�I21C
I
I
37N3d 'WI
I Q
I
I
I $Sz
I/- -37N3d '1
I —x
O
Lo, ll Z
3als I �e O
a Z
+ rn
I
I o_
1
a�
rn
rn �
I rn
I
.- ______ - - -- - - -- I
M-- I
m I
O
;u
- (n -
m 1 I
0.
--
100'001 3 „OO,OO.EON - - -- — --
GGt7GG aai�!Jo-I-� 'we3�LS� -rn�
S 10-I a'do� �1NnoD o<« '3DN20S2?4 NooD
„o-,i -„zeie 2,1dos
Ned -ld 1N2W2S,VH
I
---- - - - --,
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I E
� I
I
I
i
i I
I.
z-
amly� av� 5
xm ir) 'rrr.q-,h�
ua'sn 1
LaNnvi h»ab
A Z>s 3V0019
s aL
Z UE
r--- - - - - --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
---- - - - --,
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I E
� I
I
I
i
i I
I.
z-
amly� av� 5
xm ir) 'rrr.q-,h�
ua'sn 1
LaNnvi h»ab
A Z>s 3V0019
s aL
Z UE
r--- - - - - --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
R
I
ti•cv.o-,rr•
is 37It1015
WMJ IH .9
S 10-1 CVOZ! ,,1NnoD o<« '3DN3a Is3Z! NOOD
n0— ilnLfi /£ 3"I'd7S
- - -- _- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- -- -- �-
��- : e t 7 G , ;
S L o - i a a o ��4 . L N n o p o < � ' 3 D N 2 0 1 3 2 ��! 4 N o o D
N d 7 d ��! 4 0 0 7 = �� a l l o D 3 s
- - - - - - - ��G . - - - -
I " o " d . f y . L
I
I
I �� I
I
I
I ; S r o v e
I
I
1
1
I
t ;
9 ' I T Y
r - ,
I T I f i . f L 1 ��p y Y
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I v n . o l
I 5 W O ��Q 3 9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I T i G , Z Y
I I
I I
I I
I N 4
I M - - M - ^
I I
6 W 0 0 Q 3 H
I I
i a l g r
w " ' . .
[ 0 7 1 1 I l ����o l l : ; i
[ o i " ��I I ' I l ����c l l : : :
[ O ��I I I l ����m ' I l ;
����I I ��< C S I I
I I I I ��t ��' I l i =
< ��Y 1 ��4 u i G ����I 1 � � ��I L L I I ��
. 7 1 . M
I . V ' . G - L U p N t l p I I ' 1 9 l r g a l l I I ' ��w . 1 ` d 1 - 4 t l ��" I W A I I 1 1 1 1 \ A
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J I - H - V - $ J I J I I N I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 U u u U L - I L J I J L l l . ��
t l N N N N N I I I I 1 1 I I U I I U I I 1 1 U U N U I I 1 1 I I U I
u U I I I I Y U U I I I I U I I U I I U I I I I N p U U N I I N I I U
1 U I N I N N U U I I U U U I I N I I i t I I N N B 1 1 N 1 1 N N . 1 U Y I I I U U
I I 1 1 I I I I U
1 I 1 1 I I I I Y Y I Y I I 1 1 I I U
1 Y I I U I I p N U u Y I I I Y I Y Y I I Y U p I I I I I I p
1 I U I I N p I I p H U I N l ��l _ I 1 A r r 9 " t d p I N ��I y 1 1 I I U p U U I I I I
Y I u H N U N U t l I I u i " ' Y 1 1 Y Y U U I I I I
1 Y N 1 1 I I u u u u u u 1 1 I I 1 N 1 I u u u u u N
1 I u N 1 1 u U p u I I N I I I I Y I I I Y u u u 1 1 I I
I - - N ��F I - - 0 - I I - N - - N - I - 1 - - 1 - 1 - I - - 0 �� 1 - i - I F - 0 - - 0 - I - I F - 0
r - u 1 r r - o 1 r r - a - r r i T r i 1 1 - " r 7 T r - v - v r i
I
T l a . 0 I
4 W 1 0 Y ' 7 ' d 1 ' I I
I
I
I
I
I
�� I
I
I
I
' A 3 ��3 I
I
I
I
I
b F 1 1 0 9 _ I
L I
I
T 1 9 . L Y I
- - - - m - d , > - . c i I
I
- - - - - - - ��G . - - - -
I " o " d . f y . L
I
I
I �� I
I
I
I ; S r o v e
I
I
1
1
I
t ;
9 ' I T Y
r - ,
I T I f i . f L 1 ��p y Y
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I v n . o l
I 5 W O ��Q 3 9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I T i G , Z Y
I I
I I
I I
I N 4
I M - - M - ^
I I
6 W 0 0 Q 3 H
I I
i a l g r
w " ' . .
[ 0 7 1 1 I l ����o l l : ; i
[ o i " ��I I ' I l ����c l l : : :
[ O ��I I I l ����m ' I l ;
����I I ��< C S I I
I I I I ��t ��' I l i =
< ��Y 1 ��4 u i G ����I 1 � � ��I L L I I ��
. 7 1 . M
I . V ' . G - L U p N t l p I I ' 1 9 l r g a l l I I ' ��w . 1 ` d 1 - 4 t l ��" I W A I I 1 1 1 1 \ A
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J I - H - V - $ J I J I I N I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 U u u U L - I L J I J L l l . ��
t l N N N N N I I I I 1 1 I I U I I U I I 1 1 U U N U I I 1 1 I I U I
u U I I I I Y U U I I I I U I I U I I U I I I I N p U U N I I N I I U
1 U I N I N N U U I I U U U I I N I I i t I I N N B 1 1 N 1 1 N N . 1 U Y I I I U U
I I 1 1 I I I I U
1 I 1 1 I I I I Y Y I Y I I 1 1 I I U
1 Y I I U I I p N U u Y I I I Y I Y Y I I Y U p I I I I I I p
1 I U I I N p I I p H U I N l ��l _ I 1 A r r 9 " t d p I N ��I y 1 1 I I U p U U I I I I
Y I u H N U N U t l I I u i " ' Y 1 1 Y Y U U I I I I
1 Y N 1 1 I I u u u u u u 1 1 I I 1 N 1 I u u u u u N
1 I u N 1 1 u U p u I I N I I I I Y I I I Y u u u 1 1 I I
I - - N ��F I - - 0 - I I - N - - N - I - 1 - - 1 - 1 - I - - 0 �� 1 - i - I F - 0 - - 0 - I - I F - 0
r - u 1 r r - o 1 r r - a - r r i T r i 1 1 - " r 7 T r - v - v r i
I
T l a . 0 I
4 W 1 0 Y ' 7 ' d 1 ' I I
I
I
I
I
I
�� I
I
I
I
' A 3 ��3 I
I
I
I
I
b F 1 1 0 9 _ I
L I
I
T 1 9 . L Y I
- - - - m - d , > - . c i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Z
V
P
H
I--
O
J
Qm
4m
O,q-
�m
I— q
Z Z-
Q
J OO
m LL
� O
m
(Y Q
W LLI
U
WI—
�
Q LL
-J
(�
W�
w
Z
O
O
U
C
DEC 1 4- 203
Town of Gulf Strccm, FL
b6L ---_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_---_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_— _— _— _— _— _— _— _— _— _— _— _— _— _ —_ —__
Of
- I
I
I
I_�. I I_ '
.I.]1i! I-r_ I::I,IT2' I
Ii Ir r
-- ---- -- - -- - -- _ItL- _ r _i _ -- ---- - -- --- --
FT
- -'9'f�.i
. _ trr I :(17_ i,2 . i :I.
'>w�s r r � i 'r i I I r r
I
� •r anee°er i � � 1
_ � I
I
e
IIIIIIIII II I
wL., I WLllLLW I
E3 I I rar =y=11 i - - -7
I I
31
IE311 IIE31 I I
I I IETE31 I I I Ix
I I IE 31E31 I I I IE311 --��IE 31 I I I k
1 I I I €�I €�I I I I I €III II €gI I I 16
I I I IE 31E31 I I I IE311�_� I1�311 I I
c- _�- _--�-J I 1
_J I
I 1
FRONT ELEVATION
I
-.T-9b3-
REAR ELEVATION
Fi.:cF S
w
4
Q
e
m
W
U
ln a:
Z ~ °
W LL
� pwcrZ
Z
W ;°
I�
J
Z
O O O m
O v
U IL
a
<J i,�,�'. GEC a,,.,•.�
€ Z � MY NAME
O o«�
TODAY
I
- � J X16 M
S�tiG....a� ;'�
w e��r
tae 05
a -j
m
BOUNDARY NALL ELEVATION
E
v
as U
lop<
iy`
DO
II■I
W Q
O
Z O~ O
W J Q LL
Q W Z
co om m
W �a,0LL
J 2
Z C7
O O
O m
0
U a
0
s
S
m
jai i
5"
1
a
00
a
Lr)
MY� NAME
�o
o
TODAY
[_ 1 Q
O
W-7
Ln
r
06
a
r—I
g
503700'00- W ID0.00'
N. COUNTY ROAD
COON RESIDENCE, 4110 COUNTY ROAD LOT 5
GULFSTREAM, FLORIDA 33483
PLANT LIST
KEY QTY
PLANT AND SPECIFICATION
TREES AND PALMS
FILE NAME
BA 6
Bulnesla arborea (Esulnesla)
11/21/06
12' -14' oa. ht, 8' spr, full canopy
DA 4 C -)
Dictyosperma album rubr'um (Princess Palm)
15' oa. hts., slender trunks, S matched
LJ I (••)
Llgustrum japonlcuTl (Wax Privet)
12' oa. ht, 10' spr, full, well branched
PD 2 (••)
Phoenix dactylirera Tledjool' (Date Palm)
8' -10' c.t, 25'A oa. hts, matched
TR2 2 C••)
Thrinax radiate (FL Thatch Paim)
5' oa. hi, wide fans, doubles
W6 3 l••)
WodyetI birurcata (Faxta I Palm)
18' -22' oa. ht., 8' -10' g.w, heavy
SHRUBS 4 GROIINDCOVERS
ALV 15 Alppinia z.'Varlw ata' (Varlegated Shell Ginger)
30' ht, 36' spr, Wl
BVD 16 (••) Bougainvillea dwr.'Helen Johnson'
3gal, 24' x 24', Full mounds, 24' oz. or as Indicated
COD 16 C•J Codealum varlegatum (Croton) Ttamey'
24' ht, 18' spr, Full, 24' oz.
CRI 13 (••) Crinum x amabile 'Purple Lear'
3' ht, 4' spr, full, pink r1r.
CUP 20 Cuphea NesopiFolla (Mexican Heather)
G, I6' spr, Full, IS' o.c.
DIA 11 Dianella tasmanica (Blueberry Flax Lily)
3g., 12' -I6' ht., 18' oz, full
DG-E 194 (••) Duranta erecta 'Gold Edge'
3gal., 12' ht, IB' spr, full, 18' oz.
FIG 100 (••) Flcus benjamina hadga
6'« oa. ht., 30' spr, full to base, 30' oz.
HAW 60 (••) Raphlolepls Indica (Indian Hawthorne)
3gal, 12' ht, 15' spr, full, 18' oz.
LAN 55 6-) Lantana camera 'Gold Mound'
I2' ht, 16' spr, full, 24' oz.
MPL 2 !••) Murraya panlculata 'Lakeview'
8' oa. ht., 5' spr, full, STD
MUR 52 (••) Murraya panicuiata (Chaicas Hedge)
48' ht, 24' spr., full to base, 24' os.
PEN 8 Pantas lanceola (Egypt. Star Flower)
39ai., 18' ht., I6' spr, full 24' oa, red fir.
POL 160 Polypodlum / Phymatosorus scolopendrla (Wart Fenn)
G, 12' ht, multi stems:, Full, 18' oz, as bed filler
PTT 60 (••) Plttlsporum tobira (Green Pittisporum)
!gal., 24' ht., 20' spr, full, 20' oz.
PTV 40 (••) Pittisporum tobira 'Varlegata'
1gal, 24' ht, 20' spr, full 20' oz.
SYZ 45 Nzyglum panlculatun (Brush Cherry)
48' ht, 24' spr, full, 24' oz.
C••1 SFLLTID listed as 'Highly Drought Tolerant'
NOTES
All plant material to be Florida 9 or better.
Sod to be SL "tire 'Seville', contractor to determine quantittg.
Al! sod anci landscape to receive 1009 coverage From automatic krigation system
using approved water Source
Contractor responsible for all conditions and landscape specirications attached to INS
plant list. Plan and specifications shall be considered Contract Documents.
Mutch topsoil, and fertilizer to be applied according to specifications.
SPECIFICATIONS
NOMENCLATURE: All plant material used shall be true to name and size in conformity
with the Florida Nursergmen's Grades and Standards, and shall be Florida Grade 9 or better.
Plants which do not meet specifications will rat be accepted
PLANT LISTS: Quantities, sizes, and location or plants will be determined by plan and plant lists.
Size or plant shall take precedent over container size Spacing of ground covers well be determined by
plant lists. Quantities sham on plant lists are to be used as a guideline only. Contractor will be
responsible for verification of actual quantities called for on plans. Discrapancles should be
brargM to the attention of the Landscape Architect
5UB5TITUTIONS: No substitutions shalt be accepted without consent or Landscape Architect
Dry intended substitutions shelf be detalled on the bid.
PLANTM SOIL: Topsoil shall be clean, sterile, and free or debris or other foreign material.
Trees and palms shall be planted with a min of 8' topsoil (509 muck 509 sand) on sides
and bottom or root bait Rooted cuttings shall be planted In beds with a min or 4' of topsoil s
workad into the top 6' or existing Solt
FERTILIZER Mllorganite fertilizer shall be applied after pI Ming and prior to mind, at the f- --.7, 1 °Y 2100
manufacturers recommended application rates. In addition, agriroml tablets (foTEule 2 -10 -5) shall
also be applied at the mamuracturer's recommended rates to all plants larger than 3 gal. size.
MULCH: i trees shall be mule ed with 3' of shredded cypress in a 3 root dia. ckcle. All shrubs
and groundwver beds shall be mukhrd with 3' of shredded cypress in beds shawl on p t GUjf Stream,
beds 3' wide for Iedg�+ � v�� � 0
PLANTIG PROCEDURE: All plants stall be planted at soli levels at which they were previasly grow.
Shrub and hedge material shall be planted a mkt 2' away from walls or other obstructions. Material
with a mature size greater than arg overhangs shall be planted away from ova s so as not to
llpeds the natural growth habR 5abal Palms are to be planted directW in sand. necessary, excavate
tkougfl any compacted building subgrade to Wldistw- - soil and backitll with planting soil.
WATE All plant material stall be watered in t aroughly after installation so as to remove all ant pockets.
BIB material shall be watered every day for a minim m ale week period and thereafter so as to
keep conti wally moist until final acceptance of the landscape Installation Contractor Stall notify owner
of other watering requirements after installation.
GUTMG: All trees 8' or taller shalt be guyed or staked to provide ample st'pport wdh that the material
will stay straight. and true trough the guarantee period Methods used will be Such that no injwy is
catrsaf to plants. GGuuyy fig shall be do w at tf a optnon 6r IF c CoMradior w 1e6E specifically requested by
the Landscape Architect, however, Contractor shalt still be responsible for all trees and palls remaining
straight and true troughout the guarantee period
SOD: Sod shall be dense, green, and well rooted, and free of debris, weeds, objectionable grasses,
disease, or injurlous insects. A complete 6.6 -6 fertilizer shall be spread at a rate or 5 lbs. per 1000 sq. fl
Sod shalt be watered to a depth of 4' after laying. Ali areas to be sodded shall be raked smooth and
ail debris removed prior to installation
GUARANTEE: Ali plant materials shall be guaranteed for I year after completion of project
Palms are to be guaranteed for I year. Guarantee applies to h ealtt4 position, and size. Replacement
cost will be carried by Contractor.
ALL DEAD AND HAIRED BRINOEs
WW1 BE"'M L OJ:N am
APiER PLMTSBE ALL cUrS O✓ER
r DIA 3INLI. BE PAMEO.
) ALL ,ace sIIAI.L eE RBV,'®emere
l n4aL La(oscaPe.vPrv+.v-
3 -u°, SGTO( TA -- OR EOW.
WALL EE IBED TO SECNE
TREES USE —E LEI TO
AwAxY FOR PfItSE ADAa1H8RS.
TIED $PML BE SET SO As
NOT TO NASE BRAIL-NAY N ,
Y SNREODED TVUD EARm TO Po WATERAG SAUCER
(6' 4 GR iRHC) AJAL GRADE AR1S0 TRAK 91LLL BE
THE SAKE AS NRSER, GRAPE
STAKES TO EE IN Tx 30' F%1 ]a WM �� PlN4IlG
Mt I4' N GPOID.
SOIL Tat WATER iVORTr41i.
BEHOVE ard.AP COPLETE BaoaA.L AFTER WAIEpG
TM CF ROOTBALL • COT4U:,ED tOPSOL BASE
PLANTING MID STAKING DETAIL - TO 6' CAL
ALL OEM Arc SODDED eRArLT�•
BNALL BE NI'M A . CE ORs
AFTER PLALL BE ALL ORS OVER
i'DW 9NGLL BE PANfEA
I 1 ALL TA06 SWY.L PF AIMED APER
FNY. LAIMAPE AFT AL
— r Wm BIR.4P 5- Y%4•xSa• BOAF09 QI
3- eOGE HRER END4 SET
1•X4'xa'
Q0 DEGREES APART
¢RAP ]. HETAL exD9 aF iiBPY
TO SECURE BOARDS \ ]•x4.1@• DEACNJI
b HCUD EARTH 1D iGTet W4TERSG SAUCER
FNAL GRADE ARO ID iRSK WALL M
3• WPEDDED I'LL M SQE AS NSEER, GRADE
(6. O.EM Or iRNCI
WAL A ABOVE
MI W NUI WPP(WWED PLANTYK
F!?r10VE pUdAl• SON. TNw1 WATER TOFO.GKT.
TOP a R:IOIBALL CO'RETE GAOTR.I. AFTER WATEF"
• OOTAGiED TDPea.9asE
PLANTING. AND STAKING DETAIL - 6' CAL. 4 01°
WW TF U UN Nrd+1P 3. 2•x4'x6B• BOARDS ON AL A
EDGE HRBREWL SEL
5-:x4'1@' va DEGREES APART
AROWD TRM
WWI- FETAL RAID 2'rt4'%D• O
TO SEOeE BOARDS
N rKUD EARRI TG Po W tERNG SuveQ
3• CLEM D RUL GRADE ARO.tD T %CALL BE
(6• CLEAR 6 TR 1 TE WYE AS NIRBERT GRADE
�/ � MAL A ABOVE
OAOTGl1.L WIN O.fAN r06 OR
SAID AID WATER TLIM4ILY.
PLANTING, M® STAKING DETAIL - PALMS
(DG(D
JOO W
iITICAI. LtTOR O� '''''-''N.LFOR HAIIEE RANT WREAD
/ lEN�1 SOO ANDAOR PAVBG
/ HC(T a1 6. OFED mN1RIYa SOL
_ WIN TCPC• W EkUTRY SOS.
R•)orET) ORiNrd CR
POTS
PLANTM DETAIL - GROw4DCOVERS
A WT WAALL BE R3101'ED rRSH
ALLM FCR HARARE ftAITT BREAD CCNTANER SO AS NOT TO BREAK
BETWEEN OFFERENT 5FXIES, OR DwTIFE RCOn BAALL
•..OD 4D PAVEG
tt*D ERIN TO FOR2 al!E Nor SAUCER
FRIL GRAPE AROVD TREK W14LL BE
3• �
1I E SAFE AS N RSERY GRADE
F LL 2a WT, APPR2VED M_WM
REHOrE EWILAP WE, TEN WATER TNLTdG y.
TOP CF FOOTBALL COPLETE BAWBI AFTER WATEM3.
4. CONTACTED TOPSOL BASE
F'LANTMG DETAIL - CONTAINER SWFL05
2a•Nr. WRaes TO rwrd
ApJAC3lT NBXiE H4IERLL
cR vaREtt srECIEo
RDADE REWIRED 4EAR,4CEs
AS GDEs
PLANTING DETAIL - UTILITY WME ZING
A. GRANT
THORNBROUGH
AND ASSOCIATES
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
AND LAND PLANNERS
132 North 5winlm Avenue
Delray la-ch, n. 33444
(561) 276 -5650
FAx (561) 276 -8777
E -mail: grantOagi lmd.eam
Ed—W
M
SCALE 1/8' =I' -0'
PROJECT
GOON RESIDENCE
Lot 5
GULFSTREAM, FL
TITLE
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SHEET
Les —1
OF
1
PROJ. NO.
Lot 5- L5- la.dwg
FILE NAME
RJY / AGT
DRAILN
11/21/06
DATE
REV.
SHEET
Les —1
OF
1
133MG
N'd7d IVACW2z4 33 1
�� •W'v`3�115�"1n�
EON2QIS�1� NOO*3
lDaroad
„O-P.9/1 3 -1b'09
uoO puog6r�7 vo�6 :g o w -3
LLL9 -9LZ (195) XV3
O9OS -9LZ (L95)
444ff '1! '4OOa8 •(O'lap
anueny wlu1MS 4VON ZfL
Sd3NNVld GNVI GNV
513311H08V 3dV3SdNVl
SHVIJOSSV QNV
HOfloH9N80HI
ZNV80 'V
�!4 `LUSUS }ICJ }o U'Aol
9�oz 330
Saail •ISixa
(�AOw �) X
a��p fiu�6Fid
�3b
-�
?J.VO
90 /SLII
rmyaa
lid / J,fN
3WVN 311d
mp'PI-Ni - 5 W0
'ON r0N.d
N'd7d IVACW2z4 33 1
�� •W'v`3�115�"1n�
EON2QIS�1� NOO*3
lDaroad
„O-P.9/1 3 -1b'09
uoO puog6r�7 vo�6 :g o w -3
LLL9 -9LZ (195) XV3
O9OS -9LZ (L95)
444ff '1! '4OOa8 •(O'lap
anueny wlu1MS 4VON ZfL
Sd3NNVld GNVI GNV
513311H08V 3dV3SdNVl
SHVIJOSSV QNV
HOfloH9N80HI
ZNV80 'V
�!4 `LUSUS }ICJ }o U'Aol
9�oz 330
Saail •ISixa
(�AOw �) X
Snjli::) 0
wnjlGna!l
Sn�i,� ;� • ��
1'
anilo �f��IG
` 1 `J
a��p fiu�6Fid
si�o,aned
-�
Snjli::) 0
wnjlGna!l
Sn�i,� ;� • ��
1'
anilo �f��IG
` 1 `J
CONST. INLET NO. 1
TYPE "II"
GRATE = 10.80'
INV = 7.05
70
,�
CONST. INLET NO. 1
TYPE "II "
GRATE = 16.00'
INV = 7.05
1. 2'
Provide Water Quality Treatment:
Greater of the following: (A) Store the first inch for the entire site or
(B) The amount of 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness
(A) Volume = 1in. x .3208 ac. x 1/12 = .03 ac —ft
(B) Volume = 2.5 in. x (Impervious Area / Site Area) x (Total Area / 12) = .025 Ac— ft
Total Required Water Quality = 0.03 ac —ft
Water Quality Provided by 80' of Exfiltrtation Trench Which Provides oprox. .033 Ac —ft of storage
77
RETAINING o o U) Ln
WALL N89,24100 "E ,' 140.001
Cell 48 hours
} FND PRIM
before you dig
-TO
r
M.Y a
tfs the Lawl
•.
M•F'ava
Yea•
1.100-4324770
9u0M. BMW 0.
Ca1 oT FMIEa. I..
p.1S "."a
PROP.
LEGEND
- - -V --
DUSTING WATER LINE
1..1f .••a
-- A� —V --
EXISTING GATE VALVE
Par acts
a
PROPOSED PIPE AND CATCH BASIN
P
®
PROPOSED GRADE
F-.'O
AI.�CCLa
DIRECTION OF FLOW
-sD o
sD- EXISTING PIPE AND INLET
DRIVE
EXISTING GRADE
- - -S --
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
IDEWMX TO BE
E
r
C WITH
CONSTRUCTED
ROADWAY
-)a Tn , D
T
n
CONST. INLET NO. 1
TYPE "II"
GRATE = 10.80'
INV = 7.05
70
,�
CONST. INLET NO. 1
TYPE "II "
GRATE = 16.00'
INV = 7.05
1. 2'
Provide Water Quality Treatment:
Greater of the following: (A) Store the first inch for the entire site or
(B) The amount of 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness
(A) Volume = 1in. x .3208 ac. x 1/12 = .03 ac —ft
(B) Volume = 2.5 in. x (Impervious Area / Site Area) x (Total Area / 12) = .025 Ac— ft
Total Required Water Quality = 0.03 ac —ft
Water Quality Provided by 80' of Exfiltrtation Trench Which Provides oprox. .033 Ac —ft of storage
77
RETAINING o o U) Ln
WALL N89,24100 "E ,' 140.001
CHAIN LINK FENCE
} FND PRIM
TCY
-TO
r
M.Y a
MaTY -�aa F1pT
•.
M•F'ava
Yea•
F-4•
f
p.1S "."a
PROP.
22 S
1..1f .••a
I..E COCa F-v0
T
Par acts
4'ALUM.FENCE
P
P
M.fatta -.O
F-.'O
AI.�CCLa
a: Ln 31.83'
DRIVE
0 LJ
F
r
-)a Tn , D
T
n
O
°
o \i
22.67'
4.26'0
O
O P
T ELL(
N
o
O
�--
OR H
13.33' N
PL. GRl r 2 12'
76 �, A
1b 4
1.000
0
sue,
L
�3
a-
PROPOSED
DECK
3.50'
PROPOSED F0
3 ,8 /S_
LLJ
"
PROPOSED N
L) V N
Ln
1n �
2 STORY o I—
O
O
POOL
o
° ��
° RESIDENCE L° w
Q
)0 7 _
—
W /BASEMENT 3.50'
IN. FLR.= 26.15
30 0 'O /S —
r�
0
0 5
Ip
S
o
N"
ro
16.63' r
L.
1.00'
O
z
13.33' o ?7 8
L J LO
N
2
4. 0
r
IT I I
I I 111,4
20.33'
0.53'0
PROP.TRELLIS, m 34.17'
PROP.
3'ALUM.FENCE
�+ CHAIN LINK FENCE
FND PRM S89*24100771 IV1Y /1 0
P � o
L_ W
PROPOSED
O L4
0
140.007 \ WITNESS CORNER 1 j`
00 \ FIND CONC. 0 cn
C0 Co POWER (10. 4' W.) v u
POLE
10
1— O
J
O
V) ° O
'LLnn o O
Of
O
Elf
O
z °
O
O
U �I
Of
FW-
Z
v
-1 r25-
.4 1-2 o'
N.T.S
..., =. s V M 1
LONGITUDINAL VIEW CROSS - SECTION
NOTES-
L
THE COIIRACTOf SHALL TARC N[CESSARY PRECAl1TiDR TO PREV0IT
CUNANDIATION IT THE TRENCH W SAND, SILT, OR (TIER
16ATERIAL.
2
THE CDTRACTOt MY MTALL OTHEIH
A PEJ1MRATED RCP IN ACCORDMCE VR FDDT. REORROQRi
i GOIRl TED ALIMIAAI 1PERF0RATED) 16 GAGE.
1 W PIPE MR TIM FOR THE FRKT 6 FEET FRIH TIE WELT OR
4, PIPE PERMRATU 1 SHALL RC 5/16. 14LS SPACED AT 1' 7 /e'
IMINDUN — IDLES PER LDEAR MOT).
S SEE T_ DF NAPdC ANON! INLC MR C015 I=TD)T DE7-L5
0' =
I PLASTIC FILTER FAMIIC SHALL DON M IN M Raj. SECT ®N 9R5 W
AMIRITV EOWL.
7. PRIrn TO RACKFILLING ANY DRAINAGE tTR1ET1aES. THE CITY
OGINEERIIG DEPARTIENT SHALL RE GIVEN 24 NOBS
NOTICE IN OIRER TD S[NFN.r AN R6PECTIOI OF THE FAEILITT.
N.T.S.
�. TYPE 1-IV
"`�'°'� I SLAB •RECE VED•
Aa1
` -A I '5 ! 1007
=A7E Town of Gulf Cream, Fle,
.....a._
PRECAST MIFF TYPE R -IV
i
G
L7 0
U
Z Z�Nnn
J M..
aN 0"�N
W<
JJ S.
U K J
ILIZ1a P
ZZ
O
>=> WLJO P
>ZQ WQM
f fY
0
J583r°w
Uj 5 O
LL
J
UU L\
Z
0.
0
Lil Q
Q
v
�rJ �
Q=o
3 v
0 a
O m
UL
O°
J�J
T� O
0.
i
11F.S./ - --
SCALE
OHN Fi WHEELER
OROFEMMAL ENONEER
l ICENSE NO. 25478
(STATE OF FLORIDA
ENG NO. EB- 0003591
DATE
oB k 4492
sNT.NG.
2
OF 2 SHEETS
TCY
-TO
r
M.Y a
MaTY -�aa F1pT
•.
M•F'ava
Yea•
F-4•
f
p.1S "."a
P.?cua Tr'
P.4' "•�a
1..1f .••a
I..E COCa F-v0
T
Par acts
-
M.fatta -.O
F-.'O
AI.�CCLa
i
G
L7 0
U
Z Z�Nnn
J M..
aN 0"�N
W<
JJ S.
U K J
ILIZ1a P
ZZ
O
>=> WLJO P
>ZQ WQM
f fY
0
J583r°w
Uj 5 O
LL
J
UU L\
Z
0.
0
Lil Q
Q
v
�rJ �
Q=o
3 v
0 a
O m
UL
O°
J�J
T� O
0.
i
11F.S./ - --
SCALE
OHN Fi WHEELER
OROFEMMAL ENONEER
l ICENSE NO. 25478
(STATE OF FLORIDA
ENG NO. EB- 0003591
DATE
oB k 4492
sNT.NG.
2
OF 2 SHEETS
INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
RITA TAYLOR
DATE: 3 -28 -07
TO:
RE:
ARPB Motion RE: Coon /Condon Development App.
The recommendation for approval of the application provided that there
be a deed restriction executed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
containing the following two restrictions:
All trellis areas as shown on the approved site plan shall remain
uncovered as long as the structure is in existence.
All uninhabitable areas and basement areas shown on the approved
plans shall remain uninhabitable as long as the structure is in
existence, and the uninhabitable areas shall be verified by the
Town Zoning Administrator upon a 30 -day notice to the owner in the
event of a written complaint and /or a change of ownership.
IFAXCover Sheet
TO:
Shane Ames
Ames Design
Phone:
Date 3 -30 -07
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
(From: Rita Taylor, Town Clerk
Town of Gulf Stream
100 Sea Rd
Gulf Stream, FL 33483
Phone: 561- 276 -5116
Fax Phone- W- 717 -nI RR
REMARKS: ❑ As Requested ❑ Urgent ❑ FYI ❑ For Your Review ❑ Reply
Mr. Coon asked that we furnish him with the proposed
language that would be included in a recorded deed
restriction. I am enclosing the proposed language with
this transmission. There is no mailing address or fax
number for Mr. Coon included with his application.
Please see that the enclosed information is forwarded
to him ASAP. THANKS!
Originals to Follow by Mail: Yes
CC:
Fax Phone:
No X
UaiaU /ZUU/ 1Z:1Z VAA 150113/U13S rows of Guii ,Cream a�.U01
ACTIVITY REPORT
ST. TIME
CONNECTION TEL
CONNECTION ID
NO.
MODE
PGS.
RESULT
*03/28 09:07
2
8121
AUTO RX G3
2
OK 01'24
*03/28 09:35
561 682 3737
8122
AUTO RX ECM
2
OK 00'40
*03/28 10:07
4932727
1723
TRANSMIT G3
2
OK 01'22
*03/28 11:29
561 366 1111
8123
AUTO RX ECM
2
OK 00'42
*03/28 14:31
15613691203
1724
TRANSMIT
0
NG 00'00
0 STOP
*03/28 14:31
3691203
1725
TRANSMIT G3
1
OK 00'43
*03/28 14:53
8124
AUTO RX G3
2
OK 01'08
*03/29 11:44
4169190
1726
TRANSMIT
0
NG 00'00
0 STOP
*03/29 13:14
15614169190
1727
TRANSMIT ECM
4
OK 01'19
*03/29 13:16
274 2221
Koch
1728
TRANSMIT ECM
3
OK 00'29
*03/29 13:17
5476671
1729
TRANSMIT ECM
4
OK 00'59
*03/29 13:37
15614169190
1730
TRANSMIT ECM
2
NG 00'31
2 STOP
03/29 13:38
5476671
1731
TRANSMIT ECM
4
OK 00'58
03/29 14:19
17722214067
1732
TRANSMIT ECM
1
OK 00'29
03/30 10:51
9640685
1733
TRANSMIT ECM
2
OK 00'23
03/30 11:41
274 2221
Koch
1734
TRANSMIT ECM
3
OK 00'29
03/30 11:52
561 478 7964
8125
AUTO RX ECM
5
OK 01'54
03/30 11:59
7378359
1735
TRANSMIT ECM
3
OK 00'28
03/30 12:10
2746449
1736
TRANSMIT ECM
1
OK 00'27
03/30 12:11
2746449
1737
TRANSMIT ECM
1
OK 00'27
TOWN OF GULF STREAM .RECEIVE ®o MAR -1 ����
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
Town of Gulf Stream, FL
COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR., Mayor
JOAN K ORTHW EIN, Vice Mayor
FRED B. DEVITT III
ROBERT W. HOPKINS 11
WILLIAM A. LYNCH
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
TOWN OF GULF STREAM )
Telephone
(561) 276 -5116
Fax
(561) 737 -0188
Town Manager
KRISTIN KERN GARRISON
Town Clerk
RITA L. TAYLOR
BEFORE ME THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED x « /,, �oo�
, WHO BEING DULY SWORN, DEPOSES AND SAYS
THAT THE ACCOMPANYING LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS, MAILING
ADDRESSES AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF ALL PROPERTY (circle one):
(1) within 25 feet, *(for N. Ocean overlay, Demolition, Land Clearing, Signs and Site
Plan Review
(2) within 300 feet, *(for Variances or Appeals)
(3) adjacent to *(for Special Exceptions)
THE BELOW DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND IS, TO THE BEST OF HIS
KNOWLEDGE, COMPLETE AND ACCURATE AS RECORDED IN THE LATEST
OFFICIAL TAX ROLLS IN THE PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE.
*streets and waterways are excluded from this distance
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: p 7
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
SWORN TO AN DESCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS
(SIGNATURE)
DAY OF / � 0 20
(NbfAWPUBtIQ
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
�1qr "Oa tMy .. ALIENTO
a State of Florida
ms /yvonne /appforms /affidavit /6/13/00 -r xpres May 15, 2007
�. DD212945
100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA 33483
TOWN OF GULF STREAM Q•
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR.. Mayor
JOAN K ORTHW EIN, Vice Mayor
FRED B. DEVITT III
ROBERT W. HOPKINS II
W ILLIAM A. LYNCH
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
TOWN OF GULF STREAM )
AGENT AFFIDAVIT
G�\N�
0
Telephone
(561) 276-5116
Fax
(561) 737.0188
Town Manager
KRISTIN KERN GARRISON
Town Clerk
RITA L TAYLOR
BEFORE ME THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED (Owner) Zo '0 S Goo�,y
WHO BEING DULY SWORN, DEPOSES AND SAYS:
THAT THE PERSON (S) OR COMPANY OR FIRM LISTED BELOW
HAVE THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY LISTED
BELOW TO REPRESENT THE OWNER OF SAID PROPERTY AS
AGENT FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW WITHIN THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: y /�p
AGENT'S /(S) NAME:
COMPANY OR FIRM NAME:
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
De. /o
AGENT'S PHCSNE:� / _ 7 y - y f/
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
(OWNER SIGNATURE)
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF e , 20_a
--kNQTARY- PUBLIC)
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 7�;LIENTO
"rate of Florida
;,rrs tAay 15, 2007
ms /yvonne /appforms /affidavitowner /8/2/00 "; '
1 i 0212945
100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA 33483
" L P L
W ' ���� �� C U
��O V
a a ��a c a
L U
V C D
W y - -
J . J e f f r e y T h i s t l e , E s q .
D e v i t t , T h i s t l e & D e v i t t , P . A .
3 0 3 . E . 4 t h A v e n u a
D e l r a y B e a c h , F l o r i d a 3 3 4 8 3
I N N I I N I b i l I N I 1 I 1 I I N I N N N I I I N
C F N 2 0 0 4 0 3 7 7 4 4 8
O R B K 1 7 1 8 4 P G 0 1 8 5
R E C O R D E D 0 6 / 2 9 1 2 0 0 4 1 5 t 0 0 : 1 9
P a l s B e a c h C o u n t y , F l o r i d a
A M T 7 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0
D o c S t a m p 5 , 0 7 5 . 0 0
D o r o t h y H M i l k e n , C l e r k o f C o u r t
P a r c e l I D N u m b e r : Y & - \ 3 - 4 5 - 3 4 - 1 4 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 5 0
G r a n t e e # 1 T I N :
G r a n t e e 4 2 T I N :
e r s o n a l R e p r e s e n t a t i v e ' s
T h i s I n d e n t u r e , , , 1 5 ��f t d e t h i s 2 1 s t d a y o f J u n e
F r e d B . D e v i C - t
D e e d
, 2 0 0 4 , b y a n d b e t w e e n
v
a s P e r s o n a l R e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f t h e g s t a t e p f ' M y r a F . M e e h a n D o h e r t y , d e c e a s e d , G r a n t o r , a n d
P a u l C . C o n d o n , b ' , q L r i e d m a n a n d N i c h o l a s R . C o o n , a s i n g l e m a n , a s
j o i n t t e n a n t s w i t ��; - % i g h t o f s u r v i v o r s h i p
w h o s e p o s t o f f i c e a d d r e s s i s : L V 3 0 S . F e t l ��- a D e l r a y B e a c h , F L 3 3 4 8 3
. r ) ����u ��t ����3 6 '
` r ' !
o f t h e C o u n t y o f P a l m B e a c h 1 t ��_ �� , S t a t e o f F l o r i d a , G r a n t e e s .
W i t n e s s e t h : G r s n t n r , p u r s u a n t t o t h f t c l t 0 s i p f d e c e d e n t ' s W i l l a n d i n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e s u m o f O n e D o l l a r ( $ I , 0 0 ) p a i d t o G r a n t o r b y
G r a n t e e s , r e c e i p t o f w h i c h i s e c k n o w l e d g e d , \ g r a d t s ; , " i n s a n d s e l l s t o G r a n t e e s , a n d G r a n t e e s ' h e i r s , s u c c e s s o r s a n d a s s i g n s f o r e v e r , t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y i n
P a l m B e a c h C o u n t y , i j - d k i d a , d e s c r i b e d a s :
T h a t c e r t a i n p a r c e l o f ��, I a n d i n S e c t i o n 2 4 , T o w n s h i p 4 5 S o u t h , R a n g e
4 3 E a s t , P a l m B e a c h C o u n t : . r ; F l o r i d a , m o r e p a r t i c u l a r l y d e s c r i b e d a s
f o l l o w s :
t
B e g i n n i n g a t a p o i n t i n t h e a m t l i n e o f t h e W e s t h a l f o f t h e
S o u t h w e s t
Q u a r t e r o f s a i d S o O t i b n 3 4 , a t a d i s t a n c e o f 8 0 5 . 4 3 f e e t ,
m e a s u r e d a l o n g s a i d E a s t l i n e ��% t t f p F t h e r l y f r o m t h e S o u t h l i n e o f s a i d
S e c t i o n 3 4 ; t h e n c e N o r t h e r l y 4 i s n g , t h e E a s t l i n e o f t h e W e s t h a l f o f
t h e S o u t h w e s t Q u a r t e r o f s a i d k e - t o n 3 4 , 1 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e W e s t e r l y ,
p a r a l l e l t o t h e S o u t h l i n e o f s i ��9 H c i o n 3 4 , 1 4 0 f e e t ; t h e
S o u t h w e s t Q u a r t e r o f s a i d S e c t i o k g j ' ; . j 0 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e E a s t e r l y ,
p a r a l l e l t o t h e S o u t h l i n e o f s a i a , - - 5 e d t i ; g n 3 4 , 1 4 0 f e e t t o t h e P o i n t
o f B e g i n n i n g , l e s s t h e r i g h t o f w a y ! f o v , ' O p u n t y R o a d .
S u b j e c t t o r e s t r i c t i o n s , r e s e r v a t i o n s - . - * 4 �� e a s e m e n t s o f r e c o r d , i f
a n y , a n d t a x e s s u b s e q u e n t t o 2 0 0 3
f
l i ' " ��
T o g e t h e r w i t h a l l a n d s i n g u l a r t h e t e n e m e n t s , h e r e d i t a m e n t s , a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s b e l o n . g o r i n a n y w i s e a p p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e r e a l p r o p e r t y .
T o H a v e A n d T o H o l d t h e s a m e t o G r a n t e e s , a n d G r a n t e e s ' h e i r s , s u c c e s s o r s a n d a s " g n u Q f e e s i m p l e f o r e v e r .
A n d G r a n t o r d o e s c o v e n a n t t o a n d w i t h t h e G r a n t e e s , a n d G r a n t e e s ' h e i r s , s u c c e s s o r s a n
a s s j . M t h a t i n a l l t h i n g s p r e l i m i n a r y t o a n d i n a n d a b o u t
t h i s c o n v e y a n c e , t h e t e r m s o f d e c e d e n t ' s W i l l a n d t h e l a w s o f t h e S t a t e o f F l o r i d a h a v e b e e n f o l l y w , e d e i ' c o m p l i e d w i t h i n a l l r e s p e c t s .
I n W i t n e s s W h e r e o f , t h e u n d e r s i g n e d , a s ( (
, g p e r s o n a l r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f t h e e s t a t e o f s a i d , ; d e c e J t n t �� h a s e x e c u t e d t h i s i n s t r u m e n t u n d e r s e a l o n
$ S i g n a f o r e s a i d . - " ,
l e a n d d e l ' e r e n o u r p r e s e n c e : E s o f L i l ��t 1 , , M e e h a n D o h e r t y
r "
( S e a t )
N a m e : B y . F r e d B . D e v i t t , I I I
W i t n e s s P e r s o n a l R e p r e s e n t a t i v e
P . O . A d d r e s s : 3 0 S . E . 4 t h A v e n u e , D e l r a y B e a c h , F L 3 3 4 8 3
e a m e :
a s s
S T A T E O F F l o r i d a
C O U N T Y O F P a l m B e a c h
T h e f o r e g o i n g i n s t r u m e n t w a s a c k n o w l e d g e d b e f o r e m e t h i s 2 1 s t d a y o f J u n e , 2 0 0 4 b y
F r e d B . D e v i t t , I I I , P e r s o n a l R e p r e s e n t a t i v e
a s p e r s o n a l r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f t h e e s t a t e o f M y r a F . M e e h a n D o h e r t y , d e c e a s e d .
h e i s p e r s o n a l l y k n o w n t o m e o r h e h a s p r o d u c e d h i s F l o r i d a d r i v e r s l i c e n s e a s a n : d , r q g y n q T L E
M y C a m r n E a p . 1 2 1 1 W 2 0 0 5
. . D D 0 7 ' 3 0 5 4
r e d N a m e : ��o s r r n O t h . t o .
N o t a r y P u b l i c
0 4 - 3 0 7 0 M y C o m m i s s i o n E x p i r e s :
I . G e n � c u d b y 0 D i p L y S y . , I n a . , 2 O D 3 ( 9 6 3 ) 7 6 7 . 5 5 5 5 F F L P R D . 5
B o o k 1 7 1 8 4 / P a g e 1 8 5 P a g e 1 o f 1
4110 COUNTY ROAD, GULFSTREAM
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL
PROJECT NO. 4492
SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
DESIGN CRITERIA:
Water Table Elevation =
Rainfall Depths:
PROJECT AREAS:
Project Area
Buildings
Paved Areas
Sod /Landscape Areas
Lake
COMPUTATIONS:
I. Compute Pervious - Impervious Acreages:
Existing Conditions:
Impervious Acreage =
% Impervious =
Pervious Acreage =
% Pervious =
Proposed Conditions:
Impervious Acreage =
% Impervious =
Pervious Acreage =
% Pervious =
2.00 NGVD
20.00 Inches (100 - year -24 -hour)
14.00 Inches (25- year -24 -hour)
8.00 Inches (5- year -24 -hour)
Existing
0.32 Ac.
0.05 Ac.
0.15 Ac.
0.12 Ac.
0.00 Ac.
•RECEIVED•
_3 15 2007
1 town of Gulf Stream,, FL
Proposed
0.32 Ac.
0.03 Ac.
0.11 Ac.
0.18 Ac.
0.00 Ac.
Building + Paved Areas + Surface Water
= 0.194 Ac
0.194 x 100 = 60.474
0.32 Ac.
Project Area - Impervious
0.1268 Ac.
0.1268 x 100= 40
0.32 Ac.
Building + Paved Areas + lakes
= 0.138 Ac
0.138 x 100 = 43.01746
0.3208
Project Area - Impervious
0.1828 Ac
0.1828 x 100= 57
0.32 Ac.
H. Compute Soil Storage and SCS Curve Number:
1. Water Table Elevation =
2. Average (low) Proposed Finished Grade Elev. =
3. Average (low) Existing Finished Grade Elevation =
4. Average depth from existing grade to wet season water table =
5. Average depth from proposed grade to ,vet season water table =
6. (Existing) From the soil storage table, depth of 9 ft so use 4+ ,10.9" (75 %)
7. (Proposed) From the soil storage table, depth of 9 ft,so use 4 +, 10.9" (750/
Existing Conditions:
5. Ground storage under pervious areas:
8.175 in 0.1268 Ac.
2 NGVD
11.00 NGVD
11 NGVD
9 f
9 f
8.175 inches of storage
8.175 inches of storage
= 0.0863825 Ac -ft
12 in./ ft.
6. Equivalent soil storage:
S = 0.09 Ac -ft. x 12 in. = 3.231265586 inches
0.32 Ac. 1 ft
7. SCS Curve Number
CN = 1000 = 76
S +10
Proposed Conditions:
8. Ground storage under pervious areas:
8.175 x 0.18 Ac. = 0.12 Ac. -ft.
12 in.l ft.
9. Equivalent soil storage:
S = = 0.12 Ac. -ft. x 12 in. = 4.658322943 inches
0.32 Ac. 1 ft.
10. SCS Curare Number:
CN = 1000 = 68
S +10
III. Compute the increase of runoff for a 100 -year, 3 -day event (Existing):
3 -day Rainfall Amount: 27.18 in.
Existing Conditions:
Runoff = [ 27.18 -.2 ( 2.59) ] 2 = 704.04
[ 27.18 + .8 ( 2.59 ) ] 29.765012
Volume= 23.65 x 0.32 = 0.63 Ac -ft.
12
23.65326
III. Compute the increase of runoff for a 100 -year, 3 -day event (proposed):
Proposed Conditions:
Runoff = [ 27.18 -.2 ( 2.969 ) 1 2 =
[27.18 +.8(2.969)]
Volume = 22.29 x 0.32 =
12
Increase in runoff = - 0.0363878 Ac -ft
IV. Water Quality:
0.60 Ac -ft.
688.98 = 22.29213
30.906658
Greater of the following: (A) Store the first inch for the entire site; (B) the amount of 2.5 times the
percentage of imperviousness.
(A) Volume =1 in. x 0.3208 ac. x 1112 = 0.03 ac -ft
(B) Site Area = Total Area - (Bldg. + Lakes) 0.2938 Ac.
Impervous Area = Site Area - Pervious: 0.111 Ac.
Volume= 2.5 in. x (Impervious Area /Site Area) x Total Area x 1112 = 0.02525 Ac -ft
The total required water quality volume 0.03 Ac -ft
Palm Beach County Property Appraiser Property Search System Page I of I
IProperty Information
Location Address: 4110 N COUNTY RD View Map
Municipality:
GULF STREAM
Parcel Control Number:
20-43-45-34-14-000-0050
Subdivision:
GULFSTREAM CO PL SHOWING PROPERTY OF
Official Records Book:
17184 Page: 185 Sale Date: Jun-2004
Legal Description-
PL SHOWING PROP OF GULFSTREAM CO, E 140 FT OF N 100 FT OF S
$609,719
905.45 FT N OF TW P LI
Owner Information
Name: CONDON PAUL C & All Owners
Mailing Address: 469 OCEAN AVE
WELLS
ME 04090 3910
aaleS ArRIUMIOLIUUN
Sales Date Book/Page Price Sale Type Owner
Jun-2004 17184/0185 $725,000 REP DEED CONDON PAUL C &
Dec-1989 06303/1817 $285,000 WARRANTY DEED
Apr-1987 05262/1672 $200,000 WARRANTY DEED
r_A%:111PL1UJ1b
Jtwros - Full Homestead Exempt: $25,000 Year of Exemption: 2006
Total: $25,000
Tax Year:
Improvement Value:
Land Value:
Total Market Value:
2006
2005
2004
$166,085
$134,719
$127,087
$590,000
$475,000
$475r000
$756,085
$609,719
$602,087
- Tax Year 2006 -
Number of Units, 1
�-Total Square Feet: 2779
Use Code: 0100 Description: RESIDENTIAL
* in residential properties may indicate living area.
Assrassrau ziilu laxaule valut:5
Tax Year:
Assessed Value:
Exemption Amount:
Taxable Value:
I CIA valut:b-
Tax Year:
Ad Valorem:
Non Ad Valorem:
Total Tax:
2006
2005
1 2004 1
$628,011
$609,7191
$324,2511
$25,000
$25,0001
$25,0001
$603,011
$584,7191
$299,2511
2006
2005
2004
$10,718
$10,818
$5,683
$122
$104
$104
$10,840
$10,9221
$5,787
1. Structure Detail
I
Tax Calculator
Details
Tax Collector WebSite
Back to �Seamh Preylvus Pale ]
NOTE: Lower the top and bottom margins to 0.25 on File->Page Setup menu option in the browser to print the
detail on one page.
Record Search I Exemption E-File I InfDrmation I Exemptions I Community I Employment I New Home Buyer I Office Loc., t:on,
Value Adiustment Board I Save Our lJornes I Senior Corner I Disclaimer
Home I Links I Glossary I FAQ I Form I Contact Us I PAPA
0c 2004 Palm Beach County Property Appraiser,
http://www.pbegov.coi-nlpapalaspxlwebldetail—info.aspx?p_entity=2043453414000005O&... 2/26/2007
All Owner
Page 1 of 1
- All Owner(s)
PCN Number: 20- 43- 45- 34 -14- 000 -0050
Owner Names
CONDON PAUL C &
COON NICHOLAS R
Print Close
http: / /www.pbcgov. cola 1papa /aspx /weblallOwner.aspx ?entity_id= 20434534140000050 &... 2/26/2007
0
l�
Town of Gulf Stream , AMI.,
Ad
ti (to 0,
NUMBER OF ? owll of Gulf Stream, FL
COPIES APPLICATION MATERIAL
REQUIRED
1 1. Completed Development Application
PART 1. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
To be completed by Town Staff during pre - application conference.
r r �
2.. Fee of (OSO+ 1 :�_ + = 7! +
A.
Review and Approval Processes
❑ 1.
X 2.
N. Ocean Overlay Permit ❑ 9.
Land Clearing Permit 10.
Sign Review
Site Plan Review, Level III
❑ 3.
Annexation Review ❑ 11.
Site Plan Revision
4.
5.
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Review J� 12.
Demolition
\
Special Exception Review �z,)
X❑
❑ 6.
Permit ❑ 13.
Future Land Use Map Change Review
Subdivision Review
❑ 7.
❑ 14.
Administrative Appeal ❑ 15.
Variance Review
Rezoning Review
❑ 8.
Zoning code Text Amendment Review ❑ 16.
(Other)
B.
Application Materials *RECEIVED*
NUMBER OF ? owll of Gulf Stream, FL
COPIES APPLICATION MATERIAL
REQUIRED
1 1. Completed Development Application
r r �
2.. Fee of (OSO+ 1 :�_ + = 7! +
17 3. General Location Map (on site Plan) 7
17 4. Site Plan (2 full size, 15 reduced to 11 x 17') 17
17 5. Building Elevations (2 full size, 15 reduced') /7
17 6. Floor Plans (2 full size, 15 reduced`) '7
_
17
7. Roof Plans (2 full size, 15 reduced') l `1
8. Perspective and /or Color rendering
(Recommended for meeting)
9. Drainage Plan (if altered)
1
17
10. Landscape Plan (2 full size, 15 reduced`)
f
11. Septic Tank Permit
12. DOT Driveway Permit (if on Al A, for any
alterations to drive)
13. DOT Landscape Permit (A1A)
l
14. Survey (11" x 17 ")
15. Subdivision Plat
16. Concurrency Documents
1
17. Proof of Ownership (warranty deed)
1
18. Agent Affidavit
V
19. List of Adjacent Propert hers
nvelo e
20. Property owners withi 2 300' (stamped
addressed envelopes, no return address)
i� 3
(�?
1
21. Property Owners Affidavit
V
1 Set
22. Photos of Existing Horne (if applicable)
1
23. Construction Traffic Management Plan
24.
."' '"U,"NIv . vr,�c� u1 d ul dwnig are reyulreo, two copies snail be an original full
size (24" x 36 ") drawing which is signed and sealed. All other copies shall be reduced to 11" x
17 ". Please refer to the instruction for more detailed information.
Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 1
J� ryNovember 2001' / ^� /�
K T ,� '/. / h'-, -1n 1 L!l� tZ -1- 1 Al I.L.A., 1
Palm Beach County - Property,Aupraiser - Property Search System Page 1 of 1
Rows 1 to 14 of 14 Click Parcel ID for Detail H "x,54 p y �
Owner Name
Location
Municipality
Parcel f
LITTLE CLUB INC
100 LITTLE CLUB RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
ST ANDREWS CLUB INC
OCEAN BLV
GULF STREAM
2043453
GULFSTREAM TOWN OF
N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453•
COOKE ELIZABETH D
4240 N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
SANTARELLA JOSEPH M &
4230 COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
SANTARELLA MONA
4230 COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
BARBERA SALVATORE J &
4120 N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
BARBERA SUSAN L
4120 N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
CONDON PAUL C &
4110 N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
COON NICHOLAS R
4110 N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
ST ANDREWS CLUB INC
N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
ROBY KATHERINE W
4140 N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453
ROBY PETER B &
4140 N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453,
BEATTIE RICHARD
4220 N COUNTY RD
GULF STREAM
2043453,
Record Search I Exemption
E -File I Information I Exemptions I Community
I Employment I New Home Buyer
I Office Locations
Value Adjustment Hoard I Save Our Homes I
Senior Corner I Disclaimer
Home I Links I Glossary I FAQ I Forms I Contact Us I PAPA
@ 2004 Palm Beach County Property Appraiser.
http:/ /www.pbegov.comlpapalaspxlSALES /search results.aspx ?sdiv= 2043453414 %2CGU... 2/21/2007
IFAXCover Sheet
TO:
Attny. Randolph
Phone:
Fax Phone:
Date: 12 -24 -08
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Rita
FROM: Town of Gulf Stream
100 Sea Road
Gulf Stream, FL 33483
Phone: 561- 276 -5116
ax Phone: 561 - 737 -0188
2
REMARKS: ❑ As Requested ❑ Urgent ❑ FYI ❑ For Your Review ❑ Reply ASAP
I listened to the tapes of the hearings related to the matter we
spoke to you about yesterday. The attached is a result of my
review.
After reading the attached, do you still feel the proper course to
follow would be to send this matter to both the ARPB and the Town
Commission? If this goes back to the Boards, I'm having them
submit a streetscape. I already told him that yesterday before
we even spoke to you.
Give us a call when you have digested all of this.
MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL!!!!
Originals to Follow by Mai]: Yes
CC:
Fax Phone:
No
At the Public Hearing of the ARPB on March 22, 2007 and the Public
Hearing of the Town Commission on April 13, 2007, Mr. Ames began
his presentation of the project at 4110 County Road by stating
the following:
This is an unusual piece of property in that the front is at an
elevation of approximately 28', dropping offto the back to approximately
14'. He stated it is one of the two highest lots in the area. and there
are existing two story homes on the adjacent properties (I question
the statement of 2 story houses). He stated that this new home will
undoubtedly be higher than those on each side. In order to somewhat
compensate for this difference, and to be more in conformity with the
neighborhood, he pointed out that they are proposing to have the lst
floor located 2'8" lower than the maximum the Code allows. He then
stated that they are asking for a special exception that is available
for parcels of 13,000 square feet or less. If granted, smaller setbacks
are provided. He also explained about the special exception for unenclosed
porchs and went into detail about how the design was planned so as to
not encroach on the privacy of the neighbors pools.
In the ARPB hearing, Mrs. Cooke expressed concern that this tall home
would encroach on her privacy at her pool and rear patios. She asked
to be assured that heavy and tall vegetation would be provided.
The ARPB recommended that the special exceptions be granted and the
site plan approved as presented. The Town Commission approved the
recommendation of the ARPB
There was much discussion at both hearings regarding the basement but
that does not seem to be an issue at this time.
During the Commission hearing when Mr. Ames was explaining the elevation
and driveway ramps, Mr. Devitt questioned why there was no streetscape.
The Town Manager stated that one was shown on the list of items to present
but apparently the applicant choose not to do this.
The applicants are now requesting to raise the entire structure 2'8"
to the naximum finished floor elevation permitted. In view of what
was presented originally, taking into consideration comments made at
that time, the Town Manager and Town Clerk believe this requested change
should go back to both the ARPB and the Town Commission rather than being
handled administratively as the applicant has requested.
Property Address': q ) o 0, 'J'11--
Owner: �
Town of Gulf Stream
Certificate of Occupancy
Check List
The following will be required or inspected prior to release of a Certificate of Occupancy:
Deputy /constitems/Cocklst3 /21 /02
W g p CS71 J,1-1 J5
��cV ���'b
07C <<�►•rt��6 c,,�,� 3�q
C/O Issued
S ✓� � � � �'� ► �_r ►�n �- 9�''AiFr�,� /;' �GE1�rl. �1.��7IIff-i ry ►�s.
County Inspections - Final Inspection passed by Palm Beach County
Drainage - A copy of the as -built drainage plan and Engineer's letter is required for
Town records; storm drains are inspected for construction debris. A drainage
inspection will be conducted.
Architectural - Inspection for compliance with previous architectural approvals
(color, style, height, etc.).
Compliance with conditions of approval - some approvals required covenants be
Filed, landscape buffering be provided, architectural c nges be made, etc.
M i %Vt-S44::- t t-/f- c r iM:)i' w =1v &- bi- = 11 I
Landscaping - Compliance with approved plans; all hain link fences must be
completely screened with plant materials; buffering installed if required; no
significant materials in right -of -way; safe sight comers; etc.
Confirmation that all permitting requirements have been met - for example: DOT
driveway permits on Al A, field permit from DEP for landscaping or fencing
seaward of CCCL.
Confirmation that water system capital connection charges have been paid.
Inspection for damage to roads and Town storm drain system.
Elevation - Copy of elevation certificate.
Setbacks - Copy of tie -in /form board survey, unless setbacks are shown on as- builts
Height - Certification by the project architect, engineer or surveyor that the eave
height and roof height are constnucted as shown on approved architectural plans.
0 T4JCW Tt5- v eLOl, 'm — Cel L,1416- 1 5e ,w SPc2,
Confirm that all permit require ents for Gulf Stream lift station have been met
Driveway Permit and Removal Agreement
Deputy /constitems/Cocklst3 /21 /02
W g p CS71 J,1-1 J5
��cV ���'b
07C <<�►•rt��6 c,,�,� 3�q
C/O Issued
S ✓� � � � �'� ► �_r ►�n �- 9�''AiFr�,� /;' �GE1�rl. �1.��7IIff-i ry ►�s.
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
BALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR. Mayor
JOAN K. ORTHWEIN, Vice Mayor
FRED 8. DEVITT III
CHRIS D. WHEELER
MURIEL J. ANDERSON
October 31, 2007
Legacy Bank of Florida
2300 Glades Road
Suite 140 West
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Gentlemen:
Telephone
(561) 276 -5116
Fax
(561) 737 -0188
Town Manager
WILLIAM H. THRASHER
Town Clerk
RITA L. TAYLOR
This is to confirm that the proposed dwelling planned for
construction at 4110 County Road in Gulf Stream, Florida
was approved as a single family dwelling and the property
is located in a single family residential zoning district
in the Town of Gulf Stream.
Very truly yours,
William H. Thrasher
Town Manager
100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA 33483
I w VIJVly Lcgai UP111iuu - inspecwrs entering private property
Florida Attorney General
Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 84 -32
Date: April 2, 1984
Subject: Inspectors entering private property
Mr. Maynard A. Gross
Town Attorney
Town of Medley
Suite 200, Dadeland West
10651 North Kendall Drive
Miami, Florida 33176
Dear Mr. Gross:
Page 1 of 4
This is in response to your request for an Attorney General's Opinion
on substantially the following question:
WHETHER A MUNICIPAL CODE INSPECTOR IS AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO ENTER
ONTO PRIVATE PREMISES TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OR ASSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH LOCAL TECHNICAL CODES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR
OCCUPANT OR HAVING FIRST PROCURED A WARRANT?
This request has been submitted on behalf of the Mayor and Town
Council of the Town of Medley. According to your letter the Town of
Medley enacted an ordinance in 1981 pursuant to former Ch. 166, F.S.
(now Ch. 162, F.S.) which created a code enforcement board. Concern
has been expressed recently regarding the authority of a municipal
code inspector to inspect private premises to which the officer was
denied access or, once on such premises, the officer was requested to
leave. Your inquiry generally refers to "premises" without
distinction between business premises and private residential
premises.
The intent of the "Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act," ss
162.01- 162.13, F.S., is to protect and improve the health, safety and
welfare of county or municipal citizens by authorizing the creation
of administrative boards to provide an equitable, expeditious,
effective and inexpensive method of enforcing county or municipal
technical codes. Section 162.02, F.S. The local code inspectors are
the authorized agents or employees of the county or municipality
responsible for assuring code compliance (s 162.04[2], F.S.), whose
duty it is to initiate enforcement proceedings of the various codes
(s 162.06, F.S.). No member of the code enforcement board has the
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
V IVR!oUly i.cgai vpnnon - inspectors entering private property
Page 2 of 4
power to initiate such enforcement proceedings. Section 162.06(1),
F.S. Such assurance of code compliance and enforcement proceedings
apply or pertain to any building or premises, commercial or
residential, subject to the technical codes described in s 162.02,
F.S.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made
applicable to the states through the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, reh. den., 368 U.S.
871 (1961), guarantees to all persons the right of privacy free from
unreasonable state intrusion. In addition, s 12, Art. I, State
Const., provides protection from unreasonable searches and seizures:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures,
and against the unreasonable interception of private
communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant
shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by
affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be
searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized,
the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence
to be obtained. This right shall be construed in conformity with
the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as
interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. ...
Administrative searches or inspections such as those under
consideration in the instant inquiry, which are conducted outside the
judicial process without consent and without prior approval (as
evidenced by an administrative search warrant) are not reasonable,
unless a showing can be made that the administrative search or
inspection falls within one of the well - established exceptions to
this rule. See, e.g., See v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (1967);
United States v. Sokolow, 450 F.2d 324 (5th Cir.1971); Benton v.
State, 329 So.2d 385 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); Parsons v. State, 334
So.2d 308 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); and AGO 82 -7. CF., Colonnade Catering
Corp. v. United States, 397 U.S. 72 (1970), and Michigan v. Tyler,
436 U.S. 499 (1978).
Both business or commercial premises and private residences are
afforded protection from unreasonable searches by s 12, Art. I, State
Const., and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. See, See
v. City of Seattle, supra, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that
administrative inspections of commercial structures as well as
private residences are forbidden by the Fourth Amendment when
conducted without a warrant; and Jones v. City of Longwood, Florida,
404 So.2d 1083 (5 D.C.A.Fla., 1981), in which the court, in a
wrongful death action, stated that an ordinance requiring the
building inspector and fire.chief to periodically inspect all
buildings and structures within the city was qualified by the Fourth
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
YA.tviNury i cgdi upimon - inspectors entering private property
Page 3 of 4
Amendment and could not authorize inspection of private property
without a warrant.
A limited exception to the "administrative warrant" requirement has
been established by the United States Supreme Court, holding that,
even in the absence of consent, an administrative inspection may be
made without a warrant if the business searched is one in which there
is a legitimate public interest in close regulation and if the search
is conducted under the authority of a statute meeting certain
specificity requirements. United States v. Biswell, 406 U.S. 311
(1972). See also, Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States, supra;
Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (1981). Compare, e.g., ss 455.243,
465.017, F.S.; Olson v. State, 287 So.2d 313 (F1a.1973). No such
statutory authority for warrantless searches appears to exist with
regard to local code enforcement boards or code inspectors.
Therefore, the administrative searches or inspections under
consideration may not be constitutionally conducted without the
consent of the owner or the operator or occupant of the affected
premises or without a duly issued search or administrative inspection
warrant.
The Florida Statutes, however, now make provisions for the
procurement and issuance of "inspection warrant(s)" which authorize a
state or local official to conduct an inspection of any building,
place or structure, other than an owner - occupied family residence, as
authorized or required by state or local law or rule relating to
municipal or county building, fire, safety, plumbing, electrical,
health, minimum housing, or zoning standards. See, ss 933.20- 933.30,
F.S. Section 933.21, F.S., specifically provides that "[o]wner-
occupied family residences are exempt from the provisions of (ss
933.20- 933.30, F.S.)." As related to municipal or county building,
fire, safety, plumbing, electrical, health, minimum housing or zoning
standards, all other places, dwellings, structures or premises are
subject to the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.
Therefore, it is my op.nion that a municipal code inspector is
without authority to enter onto any private, commercial or
residential property to assure compliance with or to enforce the
various technical codes of the municipality or to conduct any
administrative inspections or searches without the consent of the
owner or the operator or occupant of such premises or without a duly
issued search or administrative inspection warrant. The procurement
and issuance of administrative inspection warrants is governed by the
provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S. However, owner - occupied family
residences are exempt from the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.,
and as to those residences a search warrant or the prior consent and
approval of the owner is required.
Sincerely,
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
-%uv,bury Lcgai vpimon - inspectors entering private property
Jim Smith
Attorney General
Prepared by:
Gerry Hammond
Assistant Attorney General
Page 4 of 4
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
---.7 --5-- VFll %Jll - 111JFJl L LV1J G11LG1111g F11VaLG PIUPCILy
Florida Attorney General
Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 84 -32
Date: April 2, 1984
Subject: Inspectors entering private property
Mr. Maynard A. Gross
Town Attorney
Town of Medley
Suite 200, Dadeland West
10651 North Kendall Drive
Miami, Florida 33176
Dear Mr. Gross:
Fage 1 of 4
This is in response to your request for an Attorney General's Opinion
on substantially the following question:
WHETHER A MUNICIPAL CODE INSPECTOR IS AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO ENTER
ONTO PRIVATE PREMISES TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OR ASSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH LOCAL TECHNICAL CODES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR
OCCUPANT OR HAVING FIRST PROCURED A WARRANT?
This request has been submitted on behalf of the Mayor and Town
Council of the Town of Medley. According to your letter the Town of
Medley enacted an ordinance in 1981 pursuant to former Ch. 166, F.S.
(now Ch. 162, F.S.) which created a code enforcement board. Concern
has been expressed recently regarding the authority of a municipal
code inspector to inspect private premises to which the officer was
denied access or, once on such premises, the officer was requested to
leave. Your inquiry generally refers to "premises" without
distinction between business premises and private residential
premises.
The intent of the "Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act," ss
162.01 - 162.13, F.S., is to protect and improve the health, safety and
welfare of county or municipal citizens by authorizing the creation
of administrative boards to provide an equitable, expeditious,
effective and inexpensive method of enforcing county or municipal
technical codes. Section 162.02, F.S. The local code inspectors are
the authorized agents or employees of the county or municipality
responsible for assuring code compliance (s 162.04[2], F.S.), whose
duty it is to initiate enforcement proceedings of the various codes
(s 162.06, F.S.). No member of the code enforcement board has the
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
f --ly 1—gal upuuun - inspeciors entering private property
Page 2 of 4
power to initiate such enforcement proceedings. Section 162.06(1),
F.S. Such assurance of code compliance and enforcement proceedings
apply or pertain to any building or premises, commercial or
residential, subject to the technical codes described in s 162.02,
F.S.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made
applicable to the states through the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, reh. den., 368 U.S.
871 (1961), guarantees to all persons the right of privacy free from
unreasonable state intrusion. In addition, s 12, Art. I, State
Const., provides protection from unreasonable searches and seizures:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures,
and against the unreasonable interception of private
communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant
shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by
affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be
searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized,
the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence
to be obtained. This right shall be construed in conformity with
the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as
interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. ...
Administrative searches or inspections such as those under
consideration in the instant inquiry, which are conducted outside the
judicial process without consent and without prior approval (as
evidenced by an administrative search warrant) are not reasonable,
unless a showing can be made that the administrative search or
inspection falls within one of the well - established exceptions to
this rule. See, e.g., See v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (1967);
United States v. Sokolow, 450 F.2d 324 (5th Cir.1971); Benton v.
State, 329 So.2d 385 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); Parsons v. State, 334
So.2d 308 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); and AGO 82 -7. CF., Colonnade Catering
Corp. v. United States, 397 U.S. 72 (1970), and Michigan v. Tyler,
436 U.S. 499 (1978).
Both business or commercial premises and private residences are
afforded protection from unreasonable searches by s 12, Art. I, State
Const., and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. See, See
v. City of Seattle, supra, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that
administrative inspections of commercial structures as well as
private residences are forbidden by the Fourth Amendment when'
conducted without a warrant; and Jones v. City of Longwood, Florida,
404 So.2d 1083 (5 D.C.A.Fla., 1981), in which the court, in a
wrongful death action, stated that an ordinance requiring the
building inspector and fire chief to periodically inspect all
buildings and structures within the city was qualified by the Fourth
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
u - 3 Y l . , c g a i u p u u u n - r n s p e t ; L v r s e n t e r i n g p r i v a t e p r o p e r t y
P a g e 3 o f 4
A m e n d m e n t a n d c o u l d n o t a u t h o r i z e i n s p e c t i o n o f p r i v a t e p r o p e r t y
w i t h o u t a w a r r a n t .
A l i m i t e d e x c e p t i o n t o t h e " a d m i n i s t r a t i v e w a r r a n t " r e q u i r e m e n t h a s
b e e n e s t a b l i s h e d b y t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s S u p r e m e C o u r t , h o l d i n g t h a t ,
e v e n i n t h e a b s e n c e o f c o n s e n t , a n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e i n s p e c t i o n m a y b e
m a d e w i t h o u t a w a r r a n t i f t h e b u s i n e s s s e a r c h e d i s o n e i n w h i c h t h e r e
i s a l e g i t i m a t e p u b l i c i n t e r e s t i n c l o s e r e g u l a t i o n a n d i f t h e s e a r c h
i s c o n d u c t e d u n d e r t h e a u t h o r i t y o f a s t a t u t e m e e t i n g c e r t a i n
s p e c i f i c i t y r e q u i r e m e n t s . U n i t e d S t a t e s v . B i s w e l l , 4 0 6 U . S . 3 1 1
( 1 9 7 2 ) . S e e a l s o , C o l o n n a d e C a t e r i n g C o r p . v . U n i t e d S t a t e s , s u p r a ;
D o n o v a n v . D e w e y , 4 5 2 U . S . 5 9 4 ( 1 9 8 1 ) . C o m p a r e , e . g . , s s 4 5 5 . 2 4 3 ,
4 6 5 . 0 1 7 , F . S . ; O l s o n v . S t a t e , 2 8 7 S o . 2 d 3 1 3 ( F 1 a . 1 9 7 3 ) . N o s u c h
s t a t u t o r y a u t h o r i t y f o r w a r r a n t l e s s s e a r c h e s a p p e a r s t o e x i s t w i t h
r e g a r d t o l o c a l c o d e e n f o r c e m e n t b o a r d s o r c o d e i n s p e c t o r s .
T h e r e f o r e , t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e s e a r c h e s o r i n s p e c t i o n s u n d e r
c o n s i d e r a t i o n m a y n o t b e c o n s t i t u t i o n a l l y c o n d u c t e d w i t h o u t t h e
c o n s e n t o f t h e o w n e r o r t h e o p e r a t o r o r o c c u p a n t o f t h e a f f e c t e d
p r e m i s e s o r w i t h o u t a d u l y i s s u e d s e a r c h o r a d m i n i s t r a t i v e i n s p e c t i o n
w a r r a n t .
T h e F l o r i d a S t a t u t e s , h o w e v e r , n o w m a k e p r o v i s i o n s f o r t h e
p r o c u r e m e n t a n d i s s u a n c e o f " i n s p e c t i o n w a r r a n t ( s ) " w h i c h a u t h o r i z e a
s t a t e o r l o c a l o f f i c i a l t o c o n d u c t a n i n s p e c t i o n o f a n y b u i l d i n g ,
p l a c e o r s t r u c t u r e , o t h e r t h a n a n o w n e r - o c c u p i e d f a m i l y r e s i d e n c e , a s
a u t h o r i z e d o r r e q u i r e d b y s t a t e o r l o c a l l a w o r r u l e r e l a t i n g t o
m u n i c i p a l o r c o u n t y b u i l d i n g , f i r e , s a f e t y , p l u m b i n g , e l e c t r i c a l ,
h e a l t h , m i n i m u m h o u s i n g , o r z o n i n g s t a n d a r d s . S e e , s s 9 3 3 . 2 0 - 9 3 3 . 3 0 ,
F . S . S e c t i o n 9 3 3 . 2 1 , F . S . , s p e c i f i c a l l y p r o v i d e s t h a t " [ o ] w n e r -
o c c u p i e d f a m i l y r e s i d e n c e s a r e e x e m p t f r o m t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f ( s s
9 3 3 . 2 0 - 9 3 3 . 3 0 , F . S . ) . " A s r e l a t e d t o m u n i c i p a l o r c o u n t y b u i l d i n g ,
f i r e , s a f e t y , p l u m b i n g , e l e c t r i c a l , h e a l t h , m i n i m u m h o u s i n g o r z o n i n g
s t a n d a r d s , a l l o t h e r p l a c e s , d w e l l i n g s , s t r u c t u r e s o r p r e m i s e s a r e
s u b j e c t t o t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f s s 9 3 3 . 2 0 - 9 3 3 . 3 0 , F . S .
T h e r e f o r e , i t i s m y o p i n i o n t h a t a m u n i c i p a l c o d e i n s p e c t o r i s
w i t h o u t a u t h o r i t y t o e n t e r o n t o a n y p r i v a t e , c o m m e r c i a l o r
r e s i d e n t i a l p r o p e r t y t o a s s u r e c o m p l i a n c e w i t h o r t o e n f o r c e t h e
v a r i o u s t e c h n i c a l c o d e s o f t h e m u n i c i p a l i t y o r
a d m i n i s t r a t i v e i n s p e c t i o n s o r s e a r c h e s w i t h o u t
o w n e r o r t h e o p e r a t o r o r o c c u p a n t o f s u c h p r
i s s u e d s e a r c h o r a d m i n i s t r a t i v e i n s p e c t i o n w a r
a n d i s s u a n c e o f a d m i n i s t r a t i v e i n s p e c t i o n w a r r
p r o v i s i o n s o f s s 9 3 3 . 2 0 - 9 3 3 . 3 0 , F . S . H o w e v e r ,
r e s i d e n c e s a r e e x e m p t f r o m t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f s
a n d a s t o t h o s e r e s i d e n c e s a s e a r c h w a r r a n t o r
a p p r o v a l o f t h e o w n e r i s r e q u i r e d .
S i n c e r e l y ,
t o c o n d u c t a n y
t h e c o n s e n t o f t h e
e m i s e s o r w i t h o u t a d u l y
r a n t . T h e p r o c u r e m e n t
a n t s i s g o v e r n e d b y t h e
o w n e r - o c c u p i e d f a m i l y
s 9 3 3 . 2 0 - 9 3 3 . 3 0 , F . S . ,
t h e p r i o r c o n s e n t a n d
h t t p : / / m y f l o r i d a l e g a l . c o m l a g o . n s f / p r i n t v i e w l 4 8 6 0 9 3 F 9 C 9 2 9 D O 4 A 8 5 2 5 6 5 8 3 0 0 6 C 8 F 9 C 4 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 7
rwv,6uq i,cgai vpimon - inspectors entering private property
Jim Smith
Attorney General
Prepared by:
Gerry Hammond
Assistant Attorney General
Page 4 of 4
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
r�uvla�ly Leal vP1111u11 - 111,PeLwr5 enLernng private property Page 1 of 4
Florida Attorney General
Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 84 -32
Date: April 2, 1984
Subject: Inspectors entering private property
Mr. Maynard A. Gross
Town Attorney
Town of Medley
Suite 200, Dadeland West
10651 North Kendall Drive
Miami, Florida 33176
Dear Mr. Gross:
This is in response to your request for an Attorney General's Opinion
on substantially the following question:
WHETHER A MUNICIPAL CODE INSPECTOR IS AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO ENTER
ONTO PRIVATE PREMISES TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OR ASSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH LOCAL TECHNICAL CODES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR
OCCUPANT OR HAVING FIRST PROCURED A WARRANT?
This request has been submitted on behalf of the Mayor and Town
Council of the Town of Medley. According to your letter the Town of
Medley enacted an ordinance in 1981 pursuant to former Ch. 166, F.S.
(now Ch. 162, F.S.) which created a code enforcement board. Concern
has been expressed recently regarding the authority of a municipal
code inspector to inspect private premises to which the officer was
denied access or, once on such premises, the officer was requested to
leave. Your inquiry generally refers to "premises" without
distinction between business premises and private residential
premises.
The intent of the "Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act," ss
162.01- 162.13, F.S., is to protect and improve the health, safety and
welfare of county or municipal citizens by authorizing the creation
of administrative boards to provide an equitable, expeditious,
effective and inexpensive method of enforcing county or municipal
technical codes. Section 162.02, F.S. The local code inspectors are
the authorized agents or employees of the county or municipality
responsible for assuring code compliance (s 162.04[2], F.S.), whose
duty it is to initiate enforcement proceedings of the various codes
(s 162.06, F.S.). No member of the code enforcement board has the
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
fiuvisory Legai Upimon - inspectors entering private property
Page 2 of 4
power to initiate such enforcement proceedings. Section 162.06(1),
F.S. Such assurance of code compliance and enforcement proceedings
apply or pertain to any building or premises, commercial or
residential, subject to the technical codes described in s 162.02,
F.S.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made
applicable to the states through the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, reh. den., 368 U.S.
871 (1961), guarantees to all persons the right of privacy free from
unreasonable state intrusion. In addition, s 12, Art. I, State
Const., provides protection from unreasonable searches and seizures:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures,
and against the unreasonable interception of private
communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant
shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by
affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be
searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized,
the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence
to be obtained. This right shall be construed in conformity with
the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as
interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. ...
Administrative searches or inspections such as those under
consideration in the instant inquiry, which are conducted outside the
judicial process without consent and without prior approval (as
evidenced by an administrative search warrant) are not reasonable,
unless a showing can be made that the administrative search or
inspection falls within one of the well - established exceptions to
this rule. See, e.g., See v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (1967);
United States v. Sokolow, 450 F.2d 324 (5th Cir.1971); Benton v.
State, 329 So.2d 385 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); Parsons v. State, 334
So.2d 308 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); and AGO 82 -7. CF., Colonnade Catering
Corp. v. United States, 397 U.S. 72 (1970), and Michigan v. Tyler,
436 U.S. 499 (1978).
Both business or commercial premises and private residences are
afforded protection from unreasonable searches by s 12, Art. I, State
Const., and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. See, See
v. City of Seattle, supra, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that
administrative inspections of commercial structures as well as
private residences are forbidden by the Fourth Amendment when
conducted without a warrant; and Jones v. City of Longwood, Florida,
404 So.2d 1083 (5 D.C.A.Fla., 1981), in which the court, in a
wrongful death action, stated that an ordinance requiring the
building inspector and fire chief to periodically inspect all
buildings and structures within the city was qualified by the Fourth
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
iuvisory i egai vpimon - inspectors entering private property
Page 3 of 4
Amendment and could not authorize inspection of private property
without a warrant.
A limited exception to the "administrative warrant" requirement has
been established by the United States Supreme Court, holding that,
even in the absence of consent, an administrative inspection may be
made without a warrant if the business searched is one in which there
is a legitimate public interest in close regulation and if the search
is conducted under the authority of a statute meeting certain
specificity requirements. United States v. Biswell, 406 U.S. 311
(1972). See also, Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States, supra;
Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (1981). Compare, e.g., ss 455.243,
465.017, F.S.; Olson v. State, 287 So.2d 313 (F1a.1973). No such
statutory authority for warrantless searches appears to exist with
regard to local code enforcement boards or code inspectors.
Therefore, the administrative searches or inspections under
consideration may not be constitutionally conducted without the
consent of the owner or the operator or occupant of the affected
premises or without a duly issued search or administrative inspection
warrant.
The Florida Statutes, however, now make provisions for the
procurement and issuance of "inspection warrant(s)" which authorize a
state or local official to conduct an inspection of any building,
place or structure, other than an owner - occupied family residence, as
authorized or required by state or local law or rule relating to
municipal or county building, fire, safety, plumbing, electrical,
health, minimum housing, or zoning standards. See, ss 933.20- 933.30,
F.S. Section 933.21, F.S., specifically provides that "[o]wner-
occupied family residences are exempt from the provisions of (ss
933.20- 933.30, F.S.)." As related to municipal or county building,
fire, safety, plumbing, electrical, health, minimum housing or zoning
standards, all other places, dwellings, structures or premises are
subject to the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.
Therefore, it is my opinion that a municipal code inspector is
without authority to enter onto any private, commercial or
residential property to assure compliance with or to enforce the
various technical codes of the municipality or to conduct any
administrative inspections or searches without the consent of the
owner or the operator or occupant of such premises or without a duly
issued search or administrative inspection warrant. The procurement
and issuance of administrative inspection warrants is governed by the
provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S. However, owner - occupied family
residences are exempt from the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.,
and as to those residences a search warrant or the prior consent and
approval of the owner is required.
Sincerely,
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929D04A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
tiuvisory i egai vpmion - inspectors entering private property
Jim Smith
Attorney General
Prepared by:
Gerry Hammond
Assistant Attorney General
Page 4 of 4
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
r,uvlavly vP1111ui1 - 1IRSPCULUE5 effiering private property
Florida Attorney General
Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 84 -32
Date: April 2, 1984
Subject: Inspectors entering private property
Mr. Maynard A. Gross
Town Attorney
Town of Medley
Suite 200, Dadeland West
10651 North Kendall Drive
Miami, Florida 33176
Dear Mr. Gross:
Page 1 of 4
This is in response to your request for an Attorney General's Opinion
on substantially the following question:
WHETHER A MUNICIPAL CODE INSPECTOR IS AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO ENTER
ONTO PRIVATE PREMISES TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OR ASSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH LOCAL TECHNICAL CODES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR
OCCUPANT OR HAVING FIRST PROCURED A WARRANT?
This request has been submitted on behalf of the Mayor and Town
Council of the Town of Medley. According to your letter the Town of
Medley enacted an ordinance in 1981 pursuant to former Ch. 166, F.S.
(now Ch. 162, F.S.) which created a code enforcement board. Concern
has been expressed recently regarding the authority of a municipal
code inspector to inspect private premises to which the officer was
denied access or, once on such premises, the officer was requested to
leave. Your inquiry generally refers to "premises" without
distinction between business premises and private residential
premises.
The intent of the "Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act," ss
162.01- 162.13, F.S., is to protect and improve the health, safety and
welfare of county or municipal citizens by authorizing the creation
of administrative boards to provide an equitable, expeditious,
effective and inexpensive method of enforcing county or municipal
technical codes. Section 162.02, F.S. The local code inspectors are
the authorized agents or employees of the county or municipality
responsible for assuring code compliance (s 162.04[2], F.S.), whose
duty it is to initiate enforcement proceedings of the various codes
(s 162.06, F.S.). No member of the code enforcement board has the
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
tiavisory Legat upmion - Inspectors entering private property
Page 2 of 4
power to initiate such enforcement proceedings. Section 162.06(1),
F.S. Such assurance of code compliance and enforcement proceedings
apply or pertain to any building or premises, commercial or
residential, subject to the technical codes described in s 162.02,
F.S.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made
applicable to the states through the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, reh. den., 368 U.S.
871 (1961), guarantees to all persons the right of privacy free from
unreasonable state intrusion. In addition, s 12, Art. I, State
Const., provides protection from unreasonable searches and seizures:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures,
and against the unreasonable interception of private
communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant
shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by
affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be
searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized,
the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence
to be obtained. This right shall be construed in conformity with
the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as
interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. ...
Administrative searches or inspections such as those under
consideration in the instant inquiry, which are conducted outside the
judicial process without consent and without prior approval (as
evidenced by an administrative search warrant) are not reasonable,
unless a showing can be made that the administrative search or
inspection falls within one of the well - established exceptions to
this rule. See, e.g., See v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (1967);
United States v. Sokolow, 450 F.2d 324 (5th Cir.1971); Benton v.
State, 329 So.2d 385 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); Parsons v. State, 334
So.2d 308 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); and AGO 82 -7. CF., Colonnade Catering
Corp. v. United States, 397 U.S. 72 (1970), and Michigan v. Tyler,
436 U.S. 499 (1978).
Both business or commercial premises and private residences are
afforded protection from unreasonable searches by s 12, Art. I, State
Const., and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. See, See
v. City of Seattle, supra, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that
administrative inspections of commercial structures as well as
private residences are forbidden by the Fourth Amendment when
conducted without a warrant; and Jones v. City of Longwood, Florida,
404 So.2d 1083 (5 D.C.A.Fla., 1981), in which the court, in a
wrongful death action, stated that an ordinance requiring the
building inspector and fire chief to periodically inspect all
buildings and structures within the city was qualified by the Fourth
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
tiuvisory Legai vpmion - inspectors entering private property
Page 3 of 4
Amendment and could not authorize inspection of private property
without a warrant.
A limited exception to the "administrative warrant" requirement has
been established by the United States Supreme Court, holding that,
even in the absence of consent, an administrative inspection may be
made without a warrant if the business searched is one in which there
is a legitimate public interest in close regulation and if the search
is conducted under the authority of a statute meeting certain
specificity requirements. United States v. Biswell, 406 U.S. 311
(1972). See also, Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States, supra;
Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (1981). Compare, e.g., ss 455.243,
465.017, F.S.; Olson v. State, 287 So.2d 313 (F1a.1973). No such
statutory authority for warrantless searches appears to exist with
regard to local code enforcement boards or code inspectors.
Therefore, the administrative searches or inspections under
consideration may not be constitutionally conducted without the
consent of the owner or the operator or occupant of the affected
premises or without a duly issued search or administrative inspection
warrant.
The Florida Statutes, however, now make provisions for the
procurement and issuance of "inspection warrant(s)" which authorize a
state or local official to conduct an inspection of any building,
place or structure, other than an owner - occupied family residence, as
authorized or required by state or local law or rule relating to
municipal or county building, fire, safety, plumbing, electrical,
health, minimum housing, or zoning standards. See, ss 933.20- 933.30,
F.S. Section 933.21, F.S., specifically provides that "[o]wner-
occupied family residences are exempt from the provisions of (ss
933.20- 933.30, F.S.)." As related to municipal or county building,
fire, safety, plumbing, electrical, health, minimum housing or zoning
standards, all other places, dwellings, structures or premises are
subject to the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.
Therefore, it is my opinion that a municipal code inspector is
without authority to enter onto any private, commercial or
residential property to assure compliance with or to enforce the
various technical codes of the municipality or to conduct any
administrative inspections or searches without the consent of the
owner or the operator or occupant of such premises or without a duly
issued search or administrative inspection warrant. The procurement
and issuance of administrative inspection warrants is governed by the
provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S. However, owner- occupied family
residences are exempt from the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.,
and as to those residences a search warrant or the prior consent and
approval of the owner is required.
Sincerely,
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
Advisory Legal Opinion - Inspectors entering private property
Jim Smith
Attorney General
Prepared by:
Gerry Hammond
Assistant Attorney General
Page 4 of 4
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929D04A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
tiuvisory Eegai upmion - inspectors entering private property Page 1 of 4
Florida Attorney General
Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 84 -32
Date: April 2, 1984
Subject: Inspectors entering private property
Mr. Maynard A. Gross
Town Attorney
Town of Medley
Suite 200, Dadeland West
10651 North Kendall Drive
Miami, Florida 33176
Dear Mr. Gross:
This is in response to your request for an Attorney General's Opinion
on substantially the following question:
WHETHER A MUNICIPAL CODE INSPECTOR IS AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO ENTER
ONTO PRIVATE PREMISES TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OR ASSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH LOCAL TECHNICAL CODES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR
OCCUPANT OR HAVING FIRST PROCURED A WARRANT?
This request has been submitted on behalf of the Mayor and Town
Council of the Town of Medley. According to your letter the Town of
Medley enacted an ordinance in 1981 pursuant to former Ch. 166, F.S.
(now Ch. 162, F.S.) which created a code enforcement board. Concern
has been expressed recently regarding the authority of a municipal
code inspector to inspect private premises to which the officer was
denied access or, once on such premises, the officer was requested to
leave. Your inquiry generally refers to "premises" without
distinction between business premises and private residential
premises.
The intent of the "Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act," ss
162.01- 162.13, F.S., is to protect and improve the health, safety and
welfare of county or municipal citizens by authorizing the creation
of administrative boards to provide an equitable, expeditious,
effective and inexpensive method of enforcing county or municipal
technical codes. Section 162.02, F.S. The local code inspectors are
the authorized agents or employees of the county or municipality
responsible for assuring code compliance (s 162.04[2], F.S.), whose
duty it is to initiate enforcement proceedings of the various codes
(s 162.06, F.S.). No member of the code enforcement board has the
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
Aavisory Legal upimon - Inspectors entering private property
Page 2 of 4
power to initiate such enforcement proceedings. Section 162.06(1),
F.S. Such assurance of code compliance and enforcement proceedings
apply or pertain to any building or premises, commercial or
residential, subject to the technical codes described in s 162.02,
F.S.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made
applicable to the states through the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, reh. den., 368 U.S.
871 (1961), guarantees to all persons the right of privacy free from
unreasonable state intrusion. In addition, s 12, Art. I, State
Const., provides protection from unreasonable searches and seizures:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures,
and against the unreasonable interception of private
communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant
shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by
affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be
searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized,
the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence
to be obtained. This right shall be construed in conformity with
the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as
interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. ...
Administrative searches or inspections such as those under
consideration in the instant inquiry, which are conducted outside the
judicial process without consent and without prior approval (as
evidenced by an administrative search warrant) are not reasonable,
unless a showing can be made that the administrative search or
inspection falls within one of the well - established exceptions to
this rule. See, e.g., See v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (1967);
United States v. Sokolow, 450 F.2d 324 (5th Cir.1971); Benton v.
State, 329 So.2d 385 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); Parsons v. State, 334
So.2d 308 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); and AGO 82 -7. CF., Colonnade Catering
Corp. v. United States, 397 U.S. 72 (1970), and Michigan v. Tyler,
436 U.S. 499 (1978).
Both business or commercial premises and private residences are
afforded protection from unreasonable searches by s 12, Art. I, State
Const., and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. See, See
v. City of Seattle, supra, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that
administrative inspections of commercial structures as well as
private residences are forbidden by the Fourth Amendment when
conducted without a warrant; and Jones v. City of Longwood, Florida,
404 So.2d 1083 (5 D.C.A.Fla., 1981), in which the court, in a
wrongful death action, stated that an ordinance requiring the
building inspector and fire chief to periodically inspect all
buildings and structures within the city was qualified by the Fourth
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
Aavisory Legal upimon - Inspectors entering private property
Page 3 of 4
Amendment and could not authorize inspection of private property
without a warrant.
A limited exception to the "administrative warrant" requirement has
been established by the United States Supreme Court, holding that,
even in the absence of consent, an administrative inspection may be
made without a warrant if the business searched is one in which there
is a legitimate public interest in close regulation and if the search
is conducted under the authority of a statute meeting certain
specificity requirements. United States v. Biswell, 406 U.S. 311
(1972). See also, Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States, supra;
Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (1981). Compare, e.g., ss 455.243,
465.017, F.S.; Olson v. State, 287 So.2d 313 (F1a.1973). No such
statutory authority for warrantless searches appears to exist with
regard to local code enforcement boards or code inspectors.
Therefore, the administrative searches or inspections under
consideration may not be constitutionally conducted without the
consent of the owner or the operator or occupant of the affected
premises or without a duly issued search or administrative inspection
warrant.
The Florida Statutes, however, now make provisions for the
procurement and issuance of "inspection warrant(s)" which authorize a
state or local official to conduct an inspection of any building,
place or structure, other than an owner - occupied family residence, as
authorized or required by state or local law or rule relating to
municipal or county building, fire, safety, plumbing, electrical,
health, minimum housing, or zoning standards. See, ss 933.20- 933.30,
F.S. Section 933.21, F.S., specifically provides that "[o]wner-
occupied family residences are exempt from the provisions of (ss
933.20- 933.30, F.S.)." As related to municipal or county building,
fire, safety, plumbing, electrical, health, minimum housing or zoning
standards, all other places, dwellings, structures or premises are
subject to the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.
Therefore, it is my opinion that a municipal code inspector is
without authority to enter onto any private, commercial or
residential property to assure compliance with or to enforce the
various technical codes of the municipality or to conduct any
administrative inspections or searches without the consent of the
owner or the operator or occupant of such premises or without a duly
issued search or administrative inspection warrant. The procurement
and issuance of administrative inspection warrants is governed by the
provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S. However, owner- occupied family
residences are exempt from the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.,
and as to those residences a search warrant or the prior consent and
approval of the owner is required.
Sincerely,
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
,Aavisory Legal Upimon - Inspectors entering private property
Jim Smith
Attorney General
Prepared by:
Gerry Hammond
Assistant Attorney General
Page 4 of 4
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
ACMSOry Legal upimon - Inspectors entering private property
Florida Attorney General
Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 84 -32
Date: April 2, 1984
Subject: Inspectors entering private property
Mr. Maynard A. Gross
Town Attorney
Town of Medley
Suite 200, Dadeland West
10651 North Kendall Drive
Miami, Florida 33176
Dear Mr. Gross:
Page 1 of 4
This is in response to your request for an Attorney General's Opinion
on substantially the following question:
WHETHER A MUNICIPAL CODE INSPECTOR IS AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO ENTER
ONTO PRIVATE PREMISES TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OR ASSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH LOCAL TECHNICAL CODES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR
OCCUPANT OR HAVING FIRST PROCURED A WARRANT?
This request has been submitted on behalf of the Mayor and Town
Council of the Town of Medley. According to your letter the Town of
Medley enacted an ordinance in 1981 pursuant to former Ch. 166, F.S.
(now Ch. 162, F.S.) which created a code enforcement board. Concern
has been expressed recently regarding the authority of a municipal
code inspector to inspect private premises to which the officer was
denied access or, once on such premises, the officer was requested to
leave. Your inquiry generally refers to "premises" without
distinction between business premises and private residential
premises.
The intent of the "Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act," ss
162.01- 162.13, F.S., is to protect and improve the health, safety and
welfare of county or municipal citizens by authorizing the creation
of administrative boards to provide an equitable, expeditious,
effective and inexpensive method of enforcing county or municipal
technical codes. Section 162.02, F.S. The local code inspectors are
the authorized agents or employees of the county or municipality
responsible for assuring code compliance (s 162.04[2], F.S.), whose
duty it is to initiate enforcement proceedings of the various codes
(s 162.06, F.S.). No member of the code enforcement board has the
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
Advisory Legal Opinion - Inspectors entering private property
Page 2 of 4
power to initiate such enforcement proceedings. Section 162.06(1),
F.S. Such assurance of code compliance and enforcement proceedings
apply or pertain to any building or premises, commercial or
residential, subject to the technical codes described in s 162.02,
F.S.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made
applicable to the states through the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, reh. den., 368 U.S.
871 (1961), guarantees to all persons the right of privacy free from
unreasonable state intrusion. In addition, s 12, Art. I, State
Const., provides protection from unreasonable searches and seizures:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures,
and against the unreasonable interception of private
communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant
shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by
affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be
searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized,
the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence
to be obtained. This right shall be construed in conformity with
the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as
interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. ...
Administrative searches or inspections such as those under
consideration in the instant inquiry, which are conducted outside the
judicial process without consent and without prior approval (as
evidenced by an administrative search warrant) are not reasonable,
unless a showing can be made that the administrative search or
inspection falls within one of the well - established exceptions to
this rule. See, e.g., See v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (1967);
United States v. Sokolow, 450 F.2d 324 (5th Cir.1971); Benton v.
State, 329 So.2d 385 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); Parsons v. State, 334
So.2d 308 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); and AGO 82 -7. CF., Colonnade Catering
Corp. v. United States, 397 U.S. 72 (1970), and Michigan v. Tyler,
436 U.S. 499 (1978).
Both business or commercial premises and private residences are
afforded protection from unreasonable searches by s 12, Art. I, State
Const., and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. See, See
v. City of Seattle, supra, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that
administrative inspections of comm ercial structures as well as
private residences are forbidden by the Fourth Amendment when
conducted without a warrant; and Jones v. City of Longwood, Florida,
404 So.2d 1083 (5 D.C.A.Fla., 1981), in which the court, in a
wrongful death action, stated that an ordinance requiring the
building inspector and fire chief to periodically inspect all
buildings and structures within the city was qualified by the Fourth
http: / /myfloridalegal.conV ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
Advisory Legai upmion - Inspectors entering private property
Page 3 of 4
Amendment and could not authorize inspection of private property
without a warrant.
A limited exception to the "administrative warrant" requirement has
been established by the United States Supreme Court, holding that,
even in the absence of consent, an administrative inspection may be
made without a warrant if the business searched is one in which there
is a legitimate public interest in close regulation and if the search
is conducted under the authority of a statute meeting certain
specificity requirements. United States v. Biswell, 406 U.S. 311
(1972). See also, Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States, supra;
Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (1981). Compare, e.g., ss 455.243,
465.017, F.S.; Olson v. State, 287 So.2d 313 (F1a.1973). No such
statutory authority for warrantless searches appears to exist with
regard to local code enforcement boards or code inspectors.
Therefore, the administrative searches or inspections under
consideration may not be constitutionally conducted without the
consent of the owner or the operator or occupant of the affected
premises or without a duly issued search or administrative inspection
warrant.
The Florida Statutes, however, now make provisions for the
procurement and issuance of "inspection warrant(s)" which authorize a
state or local official to conduct an inspection of any building,
place or structure, other than an owner- occupied family residence, as
authorized or required by state or local law or rule relating to
municipal or county building, fire, safety, plumbing, electrical,
health, minimum housing, or zoning standards. See, ss 933.20- 933.30,
F.S. Section 933.21, F.S., specifically provides that "[o]wner-
occupied family residences are exempt from the provisions of (ss
933.20- 933.30, F.S.)." As related to municipal or county building,
fire, safety, plumbing, electrical, health, minimum housing or zoning
standards, all other places, dwellings, structures or premises are
subject to the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.
Therefore, it is my opinion that a municipal code inspector is
without authority to enter onto any private, commercial or
residential property to assure compliance with or to enforce the
various technical codes of the municipality or to conduct any
administrative inspections or searches without the consent of the
owner or the operator or occupant of such premises or without a duly
issued search or administrative inspection warrant. The procurement
and issuance of administrative inspection warrants is governed by the
provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S. However, owner - occupied family
residences are exempt from the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.,
and as to those residences a search warrant or the prior consent and
approval of the owner is required.
Sincerely,
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929D04A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
Advisory Legal Opinion - Inspectors entering private property
Jim Smith
Attorney General
Prepared by:
Gerry Hammond
Assistant Attorney General
Page 4 of 4
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929D04A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
ACIVIsory Legai upimon - Inspectors entering private property Page 1 of 4
Florida Attorney General
Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 84 -32
Date: April 2, 1984
Subject: Inspectors entering private property
Mr. Maynard A. Gross
Town Attorney
Town of Medley
Suite 200, Dadeland West
10651 North Kendall Drive
Miami, Florida 33176
Dear Mr. Gross:
This is in response to your request for an Attorney General's Opinion
on substantially the following question:
WHETHER A MUNICIPAL CODE INSPECTOR IS AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO ENTER
ONTO PRIVATE PREMISES TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OR ASSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH LOCAL TECHNICAL CODES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR
OCCUPANT OR HAVING FIRST PROCURED A WARRANT?
This request has been submitted on behalf of the Mayor and Town
Council of the Town of Medley. According to your letter the Town of
Medley enacted an ordinance in 1981 pursuant to former Ch. 166, F.S.
(now Ch. 162, F.S.) which created a code enforcement board. Concern
has been expressed recently regarding the authority of a municipal
code inspector to inspect private premises to which the officer was
denied access or, once on such premises, the officer was requested to
leave. Your inquiry generally refers to "premises" without
distinction between business premises and private residential
premises.
The intent of the "Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act," ss
162.01- 162.13, F.S., is to protect and improve the health, safety and
welfare of county or municipal citizens by authorizing the creation
of administrative boards to provide an equitable, expeditious,
effective and inexpensive method of enforcing county or municipal
technical codes. Section 162.02, F.S. The local code inspectors are
the authorized agents or employees of the county or municipality
responsible for assuring code compliance (s 162.04[2], F.S.), whose
duty it is to initiate enforcement proceedings of the various codes
(s 162.06, F.S.). No member of the code enforcement board has the
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ Printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
P_ctvisory Legal Upimon - Inspectors entering private properly
Page 2 of 4
power to initiate such enforcement proceedings. Section 162.06(1),
F.S. Such assurance of code compliance and enforcement proceedings
apply or pertain to any building or premises, commercial or
residential, subject to the technical codes described in s 162.02,
F.S.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made
applicable to the states through the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, reh. den., 368 U.S.
871 (1961), guarantees to all persons the right of privacy free from
unreasonable state intrusion. In addition, s 12, Art. I, State
Const., provides protection from unreasonable searches and seizures:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures,
and against the unreasonable interception of private
communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant
shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by
affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be
searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized,
the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence
to be obtained. This right shall be construed in conformity with
the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as
interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. ...
Administrative searches or inspections such as those under
consideration in the instant inquiry, which are conducted outside the
judicial process without consent and without prior approval (as
evidenced by an administrative search warrant) are not reasonable,
unless a showing can be made that the administrative search or
inspection falls within one of the well - established exceptions to
this rule. See, e.g., See v. City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541 (1967);
United States v. Sokolow, 450 F.2d 324 (5th Cir.1971); Benton v.
State, 329 So.2d 385 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); Parsons v. State, 334
So.2d 308 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1976); and AGO 82 -7. CF., Colonnade Catering
Corp. v. United States, 397 U.S. 72 (1970), and Michigan v. Tyler,
436 U.S. 499 (1978).
Both business or commercial premises and private residences are
afforded protection from unreasonable searches by s 12, Art. I, State
Const., and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. See, See
v. City of Seattle, supra, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that
administrative inspections of commercial structures as well as
private residences are forbidden by the Fourth Amendment when
conducted without a warrant; and Jones v. City of Longwood, Florida,
404 So.2d 1083 (5 D.C.A.Fla., 1981), in which the court, in a
wrongful death action, stated that an ordinance requiring the
building inspector and fire chief to periodically inspect all
buildings and structures within the city was qualified by the Fourth
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
iuvisory Legai vpimon - inspectors entering private property
Page 3 of 4
Amendment and could not authorize inspection of private property
without a warrant.
A limited exception to the "administrative warrant" requirement has
been established by the United States Supreme Court, holding that,
even in the absence of consent, an administrative inspection may be
made without a warrant if the business searched is one in which there
is a legitimate public interest in close regulation and if the search
is conducted under the authority of a statute meeting certain
specificity requirements. United States v. Biswell, 406 U.S. 311
(1972). See also, Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States, supra;
Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594 (1981). Compare, e.g., ss 455.243,
465.017, F.S.; Olson v. State, 287 So.2d 313 (F1a.1973). No such
statutory authority for warrantless searches appears to exist with
regard to local code enforcement boards or code inspectors.
Therefore, the administrative searches or inspections under
consideration may not be constitutionally conducted without the
consent of the owner or the operator or occupant of the affected
premises or without a duly issued search or administrative inspection
warrant.
The Florida Statutes, however, now make provisions for the
procurement and issuance of "inspection warrant(s)" which authorize a
state or local official to conduct an inspection of any building,
place or structure, other than an owner - occupied family residence, as
authorized or required by state or local law or rule relating to
municipal or county building, fire, safety, plumbing, electrical,
health, minimum housing, or zoning standards. See, ss 933.20- 933.30,
F.S. Section 933.21, F.S., specifically provides that "[o]wner-
occupied family residences are exempt from the provisions of (ss
933.20- 933.30, F.S.)." As related to municipal or county building,
fire, safety, plumbing, electrical, health, minimum housing or zoning
standards, all other places, dwellings, structures or premises are
subject to the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.
Therefore, it is my opinion that a municipal code inspector is
without authority to enter onto any private, commercial or
residential property to assure compliance with or to enforce the
various technical codes of the municipality or to conduct any
administrative inspections or searches without the consent of the
owner or the operator or occupant of such premises or without a duly
issued search or administrative inspection warrant. The procurement
and issuance of administrative inspection warrants is governed by the
provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S. However, owner - occupied family
residences are exempt from the provisions of ss 933.20- 933.30, F.S.,
and as to those residences a search warrant or the prior consent and
approval of the owner is required.
Sincerely,
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
<fUIvisory Legal upimon - Inspectors entering private properly
Jim Smith
Attorney General
Prepared by:
Gerry Hammond
Assistant Attorney General
Page 4 of 4
http: / /myfloridalegal.com/ ago. nsf/ printview/ 486093F9C929DO4A85256583006C8F9C 4/12/2007
NOTICE 0 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMED,_ APPROVAL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Architectural Review and
Planning Board of the Town of Gulf Stream will hold a Public
Hearing on Thursday, March 22, 2007 at 8:30 A.M., and the Town
Commission will hold a Public Hearing on Friday, April 13, 2007 at
9:00 A.M., both in the Commission Chambers of the Town Hall, 100
Sea Road, Gulf Stream, Florida, at which the following will be
considered:
An application submitted by Shane Ames of Ames Design, agent
for Nicholas R. Coon & Paul Condon, owners of property
located at 4110 N. County Road, Gulf Stream, Florida, legally
described as the east 140 ft. of the north 100 ft, if the
south 905.45 ft. north of Township line of Gulfstream Co.,
for the following:
SPECIAL EXCEPTION #1 to permit reduced minimum setback
requirements due to the property being less than 13,000 sq.
ft. in size as provided in Section 70- 75(e)(1) of the Code of
Ordinances as follows:
Side setback for principal structure, 10, min. each side
Rear setback for principal structure, 15' min.
Rear setback for accessory structure, 10' min.
SPECIAL EXCEPTION #2 to permit unenclosed covered porch areas
that exceed the maximum permitted FAR by 115 square feet.
LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit the
demolition of the existing structure and the construction of
a Bermuda style, partial two story single family dwelling
with basement and swimming pool, consisting of 4,280 square
feet.
The Architectural Review and Planning Board shall make a
recommendation to the Town Commission, and the Town Commission
shall make a final decision regarding the subject application at
the meetings noticed above. These meetings may be adjourned from
time to time and place to place as may be necessary to hear all
parties and evidence.
The complete application materials are on file in the Office
of the Town Clerk located at 100 Sea Road, Gulf Stream, Florida
33483, and may be reviewed during regular business hours, which
generally include non - holiday weekdays from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.
ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN THESE MATTERS may appear before the
Architectural Review and Planning Board and the Town Commission of
the Town of Gulf Stream at the times and place aforesaid and be
heard.
SHOULD ANY INTERESTED PARTY SEEK TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY
THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OR THE TOWN COMMISSION
WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THESE PUBLIC HEARINGS,
SAID PARTY WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH
PURPOSE, MAY NEED TO INSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 286.0105, F.S.S.
Dated: March 7, 2007 TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA
Rita L. Taylor, Tow Clerk