Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPKT-CC-2017-07-25Moab City Council July 25, 2017 Pre -Council Workshop 6:30 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CENTER (217 East Center Street) Page 1 of 239 Page 2 of 239 City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Main Number (435) 259-5121 Fax Number (435) 259-4135 www.moabcity.org Moab City Council Regular Council Meeting City Council Chambers Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. ..........................................•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 6:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. SECTION 1: SECTION 2: SECTION 3: SECTION 4: SECTION 5: SECTION 6: SECTION 7: PRE COUNCIL WORKSHOP CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1-1 None CITIZENS TO BE HEARD PROCLAMATIONS None PRESENTATIONS 4-1 Update and status report on the Grand County Intergenerational Poverty Initiative PUBLIC HEARING (Approximately 7:15 PM) None SPECIAL EVENTS/VENDORS/BEER LICENSES 6-1 Request for Approval by Moab Regional Hospital for an Amplified Music Event at Old City Park on Saturday, July 29, 2017 6-2 Barhtoberfest October 14, 2017 at the Moab Arts and Recreation Center (MARC) 6-2.1 Approval of a Special Events License 6-2.2 Granting of Local Consent for a Single Event Permit 6-2.3 Approval of a Special Event Class IV Beer License 6-2.4 Approval of a Request for a Fee Waiver 6-3 Approval of a Private Property Vendor License for Eduardo Rodriguez, d.b.a. Tacos Moab, Located at 83 South Main Street for a term of July 25, 2017 to July 24, 2018 CONSENT AGENDA 7-1 Confirmation of Mayoral Appointment of Mike Duncan to the Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board for a Two Year Term Ending December 31, 2018 Page 3 of 239 SECTION 8: OLD BUSINESS 8-1 Second Reading and Possible Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2017-21— An Ordinance Amending Moab Municipal Code Chapters 17.36.020, 1-1, Industrial Zone; 17.27.020 C-4, General Commerical Zone; And 17.09.531(14), to Remove the Use of Self -Storage Warehouse 8-2 Second Reading and Possible Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2017-23 — An Ordinance to Amend Chapter 17.72 of the Moab Municipal Code to Authorize a Hearing Officer to Decide Land Use Code Appeals and Modifying Various Appeal Procedures 8-3 Approval of Proposed Resolution #48-2017 — A Resolution Establishing Wastewater Service Rates 8-4 Approval of Proposed Resolution #46-2017 — A Resolution Adopting the Water System Design Criteria Manual, Wastewater System Design Criteria Manual and APWA Manual of Standard Specifications (Utah Chapter) SECTION 9: NEW BUSINESS SECTION 10: ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS SECTION 11: MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS SECTION 12: READING OF CORRESPONDENCE SECTION 13: APPROVAL OF BILLS AGAINST THE CITY OF MOAB SECTION 14: ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org Page 4 of 239 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 18, 2017 Agenda Item: 4-1 TITLE: Update and status report on the Grand County Intergenerational Poverty Initiative FISCAL IMPACT: None PRESENTER(S): Kaitlin Myers, IGP co -facilitator Prepared By: Kaitlin Myers, Co - Facilitator Grand County IGP Initiative FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Attorney Review: BACKGROUND: In June of 2016 Lt. Governor Spencer Cox along with representatives from DWS and DHS held a meeting in Grand County to introduce a state-wide initiative to mitigate the effects of intergenerational poverty and develop a plan to mobilize existing services within the County that will allow children experiencing IGP to establish a foundation for a successful adulthood. 13 Counties in the State of Utah were identified as having a high percentage of children living in IGP and a high risk of children remaining in poverty as adults. Grand County is one of those 13. (see GC Fact Sheet) The initiative began in 2012 when the Legislature adopted the Intergenerational Poverty Mitigation Act. The act requires the Department of Workforce Services to collect and analyze data from a number of State agencies with a focus on the challenges and barriers facing children in poverty (distinguishes between IGP and situational). Four focus areas emerged from the data evaluation which seem to correlate with intergenerational poverty: 1) Early Childhood Development, 2) Education, 3) Family Economic Stability and 4) Health. The "Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission", a State level commission comprised of Executive Directors of a number of State agencies (DWS, DHS, UDOH, USBE, USHE, UCAT, GOED) and chaired by Lt. Governor Cox grew out of this process and currently provides guidance to the ongoing efforts both at the State and the County level. The IWRC through the DWS tasked the affected Counties to develop a Partnership, under the leadership of a Lead agency, comprised of specific community entities. DWS issued non-competitive planning grants in the fall of 2016 to assist counties in forming partnership and garnering resources to develop a plan. Plans (based on a provided template) were due in June of 2017. Grand County submitted a plan. Councilwomen Hawks and I have acted as co-chairs of the County Partnership and in early 2017 were able to bring two co -facilitators on board, Ali Fuller who facilitated the meetings and Kaitlin Myers who took notes and wrote the plan. Those two people along with an amazing group of people who attended monthly meetings made this happen. I cannot give enough praise to any of them. We are now at the implementation stage of this initiative and this presents the biggest challenge we have yet to face. The Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission requires the Counties to form a sub -committee which meets 3 or 4 Page 5 of 239 4-1 Presentations times per year, the chair of which will attend the IWRC meetings and provide information and updates on progress, needs, barriers etc. I currently represent Grand County on this committee. It should be noted that there is currently no new funding provided to accomplish any of the goals in our plan. The partnership kept this in mind when developing strategies, but the largest impediment is that there is no coordinator to assess progress and ensure the right steps are being taken. If the initiative is to move forward, it will require support from the County and the City. Of critical importance is having someone who can coordinate the activities identified in the plan. It's important to note that there is no money attached to this initiative. The assumption has always been that the local community will find a way to utilize existing programs and services to actualize the plan. While this may be possible to a degree, it will require much coordination and follow-up and is more than can be asked of a volunteer. The County will also need to identify a person who will represent them at the sub -committee meetings. This person will need to stay involved and be current on the status of implementation. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. County IGP Plan Summary 2. County IGP Plan 3. Grand County IGP Fact Sheet Page 6 of 239 4-1 Presentations INTERGENERATIONAL POVERTY IN Select County: Grand Grand County THOUSANDS OF UTAH FAMILIES are living in intergenerational poverty -- a situation of poverty and public assistance use that continues from one generation to the next. As a part of the Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commision, Workforce Services is working with multiple state agencies and other key partners to understand intergenerational poverty and reduce the number of children who remain in this situation as adults. � w F UR FOCUS AREAS: EDUCATION �a FAMILY ECONOMIC STABILITY HEALTH o �n EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT JUVENILE JUSTICE SY.. 45% of youth ages 10-17 in Grand County experiencing intergenerational poverty have involvement with the Juvenile Justice System. 1% 32% 15% of kids are living in intergenerational poverty. Another 41 °/ of kids are at -risk of remaining in poverty as adults. 7% of adults are experiencing intergenerational poverty (y6lk Grand County School District(s) District GRAND DISTRICT IGP Youth with Court Outcomes Delinquency Adjudication 9.4% %IGP %PA Enrollment Enrollment Chronic Absence 9% 23% 10% IGP Youth with Juvenile Justice System Outcomes Source: Dept. of Workforce Services, Dept. of Human Services, Utah State Board of Education Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission41) 4-1 Presentations EDUCATIONAL INDICATORS IN Select County: Grand School Name Grand County Enrollment and IGP Absence by School % IGP Enrollment Select District: GRAND DISTRICT OTHER GRAND Rate of Chronic Absence, IGP % PA Enrollment GRAND COUNTY HIGH 5% 8% 20% GRAND COUNTY MIDDLE 7% 2% 25% HELEN M. KNIGHT SCHOOL 12% 14% 24% MOAB CHARTER SCHOOL 3% 26% 24% Source: Dept. of Workforce Services, Utah State Board of Education Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission41) 4-1 Presentations FAMILY -ECONOMIC STABILITY IN Grand Select County: Grand County AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGES, 2015 $37,923 $12,259 $15,021 Statewide Statewide -I.. Grand-IGP EDUCATIONAL ATTAINME.. Less than HS HS/GED 19% 12% 9% 65% 53% ■ County IGP 41 HOUSING Affordability of Housi.. 24% I 77% of adults experiencing intergenerational poverty in Grand County lack education beyond high school. ■ Utah IGP EMPLOYMENT AMONG IGP ADULTS Employed sometimes 30% Not employed 18% Employed All 4 Quarters 52% Some college/ Associates 16% 11% 36% Share of IGP food stamp households with .. 33 % of 2016 food stamp households experiencing intergenerational poverty in Grand County were paying more than 30% of their income for housing. Bachelor's + 0% 0% ■ Utah All 32% Fair Market Rent Grand County 2016 Efficiency $480 One -Bedroom $562 Two -Bedroom $731 Three -Bedroom $1,065 Four -Bedroom $1,161 Individuals Receiving Housing Services (7/1/2011 - 4/30/2016) From IGP Cohort 69 From At -Risk Cohort 74 Source: Dept. of Workforce Services, U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Intcrg norational Welfare Reform Commission(SI 4-1 Presentations HEALTH INDICATORS IN Select County: Grand Covered IGP Grand County Grand County Adult Health %of covered children that are IGP 26% %of adults who received behavioral health care %of adults that are IGP 32% %of pregnant women receiving prenatal care Grand County Childrens Health %of chidren who received behavioral health care %of children who had a dental visit of children who saw a physician % of children who saw a physician in the first year of life Residents Receiving Mental Health Svcs. IGP Adult 14% 13% IGP Kids 5% 7% Grand County Health Issues IGP At -Risk 20% 18% 84% 79% IGP At -Risk 3% 43% 86% 84% 5% 36% 80% 73% Victims of Abuse and Neglect IGP Kids IGP Adult At -Risk Kids 58% 30% 28% a ■ County 44% 23% I� 15% ■ Statewide Health Access Mental Health Issues Healthy Living/Physical Health Issues Percentage of Persons with No Personal Doctor (7) Percentage of Persons with Poor Mental Health in 7 or More of Past 30 Days (7) Percentage of Persons Ever Told Have a Depressive Disorder (7) Suicide Rate per 100,000 Population (8) Percentage of Adults who currently smoke cigarettes (7) Percentage of Adults Who Are Obese (7) Percentage of Adults Reporting Fair or Poor Health (7) Percentage of Adults Not Getting Recommend Aerobic Physical Activity (9) Binge Drinking (7) 21.0 Abc 16.2 21.3 12.1* 22.9 20.4 16.3 45.2 24.9 Statewide 26.5 Abc 15.7 21.1 21.1 9.6 25.4 13.0 44.4 11.5 *Use caution in interpreting; estimate has coefficient of variation >30% and is deemed unreliable by Utah Department of Health standards. **The estimate has been suppressed because the relative standard error is >50% or can't be determined... Source: Dept. of Workforce Services, Utah Dept. of Health, Dept. of Substance Abuse & Mental Health Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission41) 4-1 Presentations SUMMARY: 2017 Grand County Intergenerational Poverty Plan Goals • Early Childhood Development: Parents will obtain skills to support the healthy development of children and mitigate exposure to toxic stress. • Health: IGP children and adults have access to quality, timely, affordable healthcare. Target Population • The Grand County Intergenerational Poverty Action Plan targets all IGP children and adults living in Grand County, regardless of demographics or cultural differences. Key Strategies • Fund an IGP Coordinator to implement the plan and support collaboration amongst relevant agencies in order to improve continuity of care and alleviate intergenerational poverty rates in Grand County • Create a parenting involvement program at the hospital to teach parents effective attachment parenting strategies at or before birth and refer both parents and children to additional services as needed throughout childhood • Improve access to in -home mental, behavioral, and physical health services for parents and children Key Measures to Track Progress • Trends in number of calls/cases to Department of Child and Family Services, Grand County Judicial System, law enforcement, Seekhaven, Children's Justice Center, Moab Regional Hospital and Emergency Room, etc. • Trends in public school testing at intake, ASQ-SE tests, HeadStart social/emotional questionnaire, SEEIP evaluations, ACE tests • Participation rates and exit evaluation results of current and new programs related to intergenerational poverty efforts in Grand County Assumptions • The successful implementation of the Grand County IGP Plan relies on the creation of a dedicated IGP Coordinator • The IGP Plan will be integrated into Grand County's Communities that Care (CTC) Plan, so some details of the plan will change as the CTC process evolves. • Additional funding and resources are necessary for the expansion and creation of new programs Barriers/Challenges • Long-term access to funding and resources • Uncertainty of capacity or funding for a dedicated IGP Coordinator Page 11 of 239 4-1 Presentations Next Steps • Meet with the CTC Coalition to discuss ways to assimilate IGP and CTC efforts into one cohesive, realistic plan • Hire or select an IGP Coordinator • Seek funding sources for expanding/creating new services Development Team • Elizabeth Tubbs, Co -Chair • Jaylyn Hawks, Co -Chair and Seekhaven representative • Ali Fuller, Co -Facilitator • Kaitlin Myers, Co -Facilitator • Audrey Graham, South East Early Intervention Program (SEEIP) • Beth Joseph, Moab Free Health Clinic (MFHC) • Corina Spence, early childhood education services • Daniel McNeil, Grand Area Mentoring • Donna Johnston, Southeastern Utah Health Department • Kelly Thornton, Department of Workforce Services (DWS) • Kelly Vagts, Mental Health — Grand County School District (GCSD) • Melinda Snow, Grand County School District (GCSD) • Rhiana Medina, Moab Valley Multicultural Center (MVMC) • Sarah Shea, Moab Regional Hospital (MRH) • Shelly Ivey, Grand County Judicial System • Stephanie Dahlstrom, Utah State University — Moab (USU) • Zacharia Levine, Community Development Department of Grand County Page 12 of 239 4-1 Presentations Intergenerational Poverty Action Plan of Grand County J U N E 2017 WRITTEN BY KAITLIN MYERS, CO -FACILITATOR, AND THE GRAND COUNTY DEVELOPMENT TEAM 2017 Page 13 of 239 4-1 Presentations Table of Contents Development Team 2 Data Sources 2 County Plan Summary 3 Needs Assessment 4 County Goals for Intergenerational Poverty 4 Measurements of Progress and Success 4 Target Population 5 Bringing in Family Voices 5 Survey Results 6 Developing, Integrating, and Aligning Services 11 Proposed Services 11 Aligning Services, Systems, and Resources 13 Outreach and Marketing 15 Logic Model 16 Early Childhood Development 16 Health 17 Year One Work Plan 18 Administration 20 Partnerships 20 Communication among Partners 21 Communications to Stakeholders and the Community 21 Anticipated Challenges and Barriers 21 Resource Guide 22 Page 14 of 239 4-1 Presentations Development Team • Elizabeth Tubbs, Co -Chair • Jaylyn Hawks, Co -Chair and Seekhaven representative • Ali Fuller, Co -Facilitator • Kaitlin Myers, Co -Facilitator • Audrey Graham, South East Early Intervention Program (SEEIP) • Beth Joseph, Moab Free Health Clinic (MFHC) • Corina Spence, early childhood education services • Daniel McNeil, Grand Area Mentoring • Donna Johnston, Southeastern Utah Health Department • Kelly Thornton, Department of Workforce Services (DWS) • Kelly Vagts, Mental Health — Grand County School District (GCSD) • Melinda Snow, Grand County School District (GCSD) • Rhiana Medina, Moab Valley Multicultural Center (MVMC) • Sarah Shea, Moab Regional Hospital (MRH) • Shelly Ivey, Grand County Judicial System • Stephanie Dahlstrom, Utah State University — Moab (USU) • Zacharia Levine, Community Development Department of Grand County Data Sources • Department of Workforce Services • Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission • Utah State Tax Commission • U.S. Census • Moab Area 2017 Affordable Housing Plan • Moab Free Health Clinic Resource Guide Page 15 of 239 4-1 Presentations County Plan Summary Grand County feels the aches and pains of big city problems, yet it receives small town funding. Like the Wasatch Front and Back, the Moab area serves nearly two million tourists annually, but it struggles alongside other rural communities for access to resources. Its seasonal population is not accounted for in many of the census studies, often skewing data to hide the county's severe struggles for fair housing and reasonable cost of living. Relying on tourism as the main economic driver has caused land prices to skyrocket while wages remain stagnant, creating an ever-increasing affordability gap that has left Moab residents with few options. Tourism and hospitality -related industries employ about 60% of the workers in Grand County and collect more than 83% of the revenue, yet the average annual wage for service -related jobs is $24,756 — substantially lower than the statewide average of $37,923. In 2014, 29.2% of all households in Grand County earned less than $20,000, ranking 26' across all counties in Utah. In 2015, the average annual wage for those experiencing intergenerational poverty was $15,021, just a fraction of the statewide and county average wages. Coupled with high housing and living costs, many of the county's residents struggle to make ends meet, leading to higher rates of poverty — and intergenerational poverty — in the area. Grand County is often excluded from funding and resource pools. It is one of only four counties in Utah that does not benefit from Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funding for crucial in -home services. The large number of transient residents strain the county's health and medical infrastructure systems, yet the region is not considered a Healthcare Provider Shortage Area (HPSA) for primary or dental care. It is one of the many rural regions competing for Utah's minimal rural set -aside funding sources. Out of necessity, service providers in the Moab area have spread themselves thin to address some of the community's most difficult challenges. To address intergenerational poverty, Grand County's development team selected two areas on which to focus: early childhood development and health. The team believes that teaching families how to support the healthy development of their children and expanding healthcare access to every Grand County resident will be the most effective and sustainable way to address, and eventually stop, the pervasive cycle of poverty in the community. Early childhood development and health are two goals that are heavily intertwined and address some of the most basic human needs. Page 16 of 239 4-1 Presentations Needs Assessment County Goals for Intergenerational Poverty The Grand County Intergenerational Poverty Plan will address the state's overarching goals regarding early childhood education and health. Grand County adopted one of the state's long-term early childhood development outcomes: Parents will obtain skills to support the healthy development of children and mitigate exposure to toxic stress. Additionally, the plan closely aligns with the state's outcome measure to ensure quality, timely, and affordable access to healthcare for all children and parents struggling with intergenerational poverty. Grand County's health goals indirectly address many of the state's expected outcomes. By expanding access to services at birth and improving access to in - home mental, behavioral, and physical health services, the county is working to tackle the Commission's statewide early childhood development and health goals. Measurements of Progress and Success The evaluation indicators for Grand County's two major goals are listed below. Early Childhood Development • Number of cases at: o Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS) o Children's Justice Center o Moab Regional Hospital Emergency Room ■ Domestic violence cases ■ Non -emergency medical visits o Grand County Justice System • Number of calls to: o Police and Sheriff's Departments o Seekhaven (domestic violence victim service provider) • Grand County School District records of: o Domestic violence cases reported o Absence rates o Academic testing data at intake • Testing executive function levels at intake at public preschools, HeadStart, SEEIP, and other early childhood education providers using an evidence -based assessment tool • Trends in Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social -Emotional (ASQ-SE) results • Frequency of appointments with primary care providers • Number of participants in pre- and postnatal parenting involvement programs (PIP) Health • Legislative decisions are made regarding a Healthcare Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) designation for Grand County • Legislative decisions are made regarding Medicaid expansion for the state of Utah Page 17 of 239 4-1 Presentations " Feasibility study results " Number of patients going to see providers for specific healthcare programs " Number of patients participating in certain types of financial aid and payment programs " Number of successful referrals, or referrals that lead to appointments " Number of children receiving follow-up services " Number of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) studies administered that lead to referrals " Trends in overall ACE scores " Percentage of primary care providers performing ACE tests and writing referrals Target Population The Grand County Intergenerational Poverty Action Plan targets all IGP children and adults living in Grand County, regardless of demographics or cultural differences. The Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission (IWRC) reports Grand County has the third highest rate of children experiencing intergenerational poverty at 15%, behind Carbon and San Juan Counties; an additional 41% of children in Grand County are at -risk of remaining in poverty as adults. Seven percent (7%) of adults in Grand County are experiencing intergenerational poverty, indicating that a fraction of Grand County's children come from impoverished families spanning multiple generations. This translates to 837 adults and children currently experiencing IGP and an additional 879 children are at -risk  a shocking percentage of residents that cannot be ignored and a realistic target population for this plan. Bringing in Family Voices The Grand County IGP development team created an anonymous survey to engage with families about some of the solutions and strategies identified in this plan. Several service providers associated with this plan distributed the survey to select families to gather initial feedback, and though there is some variation in the responses, the results indicate that many of the services proposed in this plan would be beneficial to the Moab community. The survey and its results may be found on the following pages. The development team has incorporated several strategies into the Year One Work Plan to ensure that community feedback will continue to be collected as this plan evolves and is implemented. Most importantly, the IGP group plans to work with the Communities that Care Coalition (CTC) and other local poverty -fighting committees to create exit assessments about the effectiveness of current and proposed programs used in Grand County. The Grand County IGP Plan will influence and work alongside the efforts produced by the CTC, and the coalition will include parent voices on proposed CTC programs and IGP/CTC overlapping programs as well. The appended survey will continue to be distributed through the community in addition to the program evaluations, with specific plans to distribute to parents throughout the Grand County School District at the start of the upcoming school year. As new programs arise, the Grand County IGP team plans to be flexible and proactive in regularly assessing where this plan is, where it will go, and how effective it is for the community it is intended to serve. Page 18 of 239 4-1 Presentations Survey Results Ten families were surveyed in -person by service providers associated with this plan. Seven of the participants were female, and all but one participant was between ages 26 to 45; the outlying participant is between the ages of 46-55. The average household size, including the participant, is 4.8 people — 4 of which are under age 18. This indicates that many of the families interviewed are single parents with multiple children. The survey asks the number of "people living with [the participant]" because families experiencing intergenerational poverty have intricate or non -conventional family structures or live in households with other families, so the survey allows the participant to self -declare what they define their household to be. Six of the participants work full time, though some of those full-time positions are seasonal in nature. Two of the participants are part-time, and the others are unemployed. Four of the participants claim to have health insurance for themselves and their family, but five families are only partially covered, and one family declares to not have health insurance at all. Several of the participants gave general feedback that the Grand County IGP Team will take into consideration as it moves forward with plan implementation. The following are direct quotes from survey results: • I had help from Early Intervention when my kids were little. After that, it was hard to figure out how to get stuff done. Like fill out forms, or read them, or know if someone could help me with my kids. I can't drive but I live near the hospital. It is hard to get to workforce services and now they want you to call or get on the computer for help. I have a friend drive me to Blanding for Indian Health care. I'm not sure what I would do if she didn't do that. • I like Moab, but it all costs so much my family can't keep up. I think we will have to move if we can't get insurance or chip or Medicaid. My feet are very tired from working two jobs and my kids are good but I am afraid they will get hurt. The hospital is nice. But it is not private for waiting or talking. • More help for parents of kids with autism • Public transportation • Providers don't communicate with each other and it's frustrating. Page 19 of 239 4-1 Presentations The chart below indicates how helpful the participants believe the proposed services would be for them and their families. According to these families, the most important services are access to in -home mental and behavioral health services and expansion of Medicaid or a similar health coverage program in the state of Utah. Very Helpful Helpful Somewhat Helpful Neither Helpful nor Unhelpful Not Helpful Unsure I already have access to this service. How helpful would in -home PHYSICAL health services be? (For example, your doctor coming to your home for treatment instead of you going into their office) 2 2 1 1 1 0 How helpful would in -home MENTAL health services be? (For example, your doctor coming to your home for treatment instead of you going into their office) 1 2 0 1 0 0 How helpful would in -home BEHAVIORAL health services be? (For example, your doctor coming to your home for treatment instead of you going into their office) 6 2 1 0 1 0 0 How helpful would peer parenting classes be? 0 2 2 1 1 0 How helpful would prenatal and postnatal education and care be? 1 3 0 1 1 1 3 How helpful would access to a free or cash- pay health clinic be? u 3 3 0 0 0 0 How helpful would it be if Medicaid or a similar health coverage program was expanded in the state of Utah? v 0 0 1 0 0 0 How helpful would it be if health and social service agencies could more easily share patient information in order to improve continuity of care in Grand County? 2 0 0 0 0 Page 20 of 239 4-1 Presentations Health and Early Childhood Development Services Survey The following questions are to get a general idea of who you are. 1. Age: ❑ 16-25 ❑ 26-35 ❑ 36-45 ❑ 46-55 ❑ 56-65 ❑ 66+ 2. Gender: ❑ Male ❑ Female ❑ Prefer Not to Identify 3. Employment Status: ❑ Full -Time ❑ Part -Time ❑ Retired ❑ Unemployed 4. Number of people living with you: 5. How many of those people are under age 18? 6. Do you and/or your family members have health insurance? ❑ Yes, we all do. ❑ I do, but members of my family do not. ❑ I do not, but members of my family do. ❑ Yes, but I am or my family is still underinsured. ❑ No. The following questions ask how helpful certain programs or services would be to you and your family. 7. How helpful would in -home PHYSICAL health services be? (For example, your doctor coming to your home for treatment instead of you going into their office) ❑ Very Helpful ❑ Helpful ❑ Not Helpful ❑ Unsure Page 21 of 239 4-1 Presentations Q' Somewhat Helpful Q' I already have access to this service. Q' Neither Helpful nor Unhelpful 8. How helpful would in -home MENTAL health services be? (For example, your doctor coming to your home for treatment instead of you going into their office) Q' Very Helpful Q' Not Helpful Q' Helpful Q' Unsure Q' Somewhat Helpful Q' I already have access to this service. Q' Neither Helpful nor Unhelpful 9. How helpful would in -home BEHAVIORAL health services be? (For example, your doctor coming to your home for treatment instead of you going into their office) Q' Very Helpful Q' Helpful Q' Somewhat Helpful Q' Neither Helpful nor Unhelpful 10. How helpful would peer parenting classes be? Q' Not Helpful Q' Unsure Q' I already have access to this service. Q' Very Helpful Q' Not Helpful Q' Helpful Q' Unsure Q' Somewhat Helpful Q' I already have access to this service. Q' Neither Helpful nor Unhelpful 11. How helpful would prenatal and postnatal education and care be? Q' Very Helpful Q' Not Helpful Q' Helpful Q' Unsure Q' Somewhat Helpful Q' I already have access to this service. Q' Neither Helpful nor Unhelpful 12. How helpful would access to a free or cash -pay health clinic be? Page 22 of 239 4-1 Presentations Q' Very Helpful Q' Not Helpful Q' Helpful Q' Unsure Q' Somewhat Helpful Q' I already have access to this service. Q' Neither Helpful nor Unhelpful 13. How helpful would it be if Medicaid or a similar health coverage program was expanded in the state of Utah? Q' Very Helpful Q' Not Helpful Q' Helpful Q' Unsure Q' Somewhat Helpful Q' I already have access to this service. Q' Neither Helpful nor Unhelpful 14. How would it be if health and social service agencies could more easily share patient information in order to improve continuity of care in Grand County? Q' Very Helpful Q' Not Helpful Q' Helpful Q' Unsure Q' Somewhat Helpful Q' I already have access to this service. Q' Neither Helpful nor Unhelpful Additional comments, questions, or concerns about health and early childhood development services in the Moab area: Page 23 of 239 4-1 Presentations Developing, Integrating, and Aligning Services The corresponding charts explaining the connections between current and proposed services, policies, systems, and resources identified by Grand County may be found on the following pages. Proposed Services The summary of the most important elements in these charts can be stated as two key concepts. First, Grand County recognizes the creation of a parenting involvement program (PIP) as the most important system to address many of the problems associated with intergenerational poverty in the community. Given the proper amount of funding and resources, this program has the capacity to address the county's early childhood development and health goals. Moab Regional Hospital can begin to teach parents effective attachment parenting strategies at or before birth, screen for early signs of developmental delays, refer both parents and children to additional services as needed, and continue care through childhood — thus reducing ACE scores for this population. With the hospital as the central connector, PIP creates formal communication channels amongst the relevant organizations, making access to care easier for both families and providers. Additionally, the development team of Grand County overwhelmingly believes that a full-time position must be created or additional funding provided to coordinate the implementation and upkeep of this plan. Grand County and the City of Moab are studying options for creating a formal economic development office, and it has been proposed that this office could take on some of the responsibility of implementing this plan. This coordinator would work closely with the efforts produced by the hospital and the Communities that Care (CTC) Coalition to solve some of the most pertinent causes of poverty in the community. The CTC Coalition is still in its early stages of development, so it is difficult to project the future of IGP's relationship with CTC. To summarize, there are a couple of potential opportunities to formally support an IGP Coordinator in the community, but nothing is certain. The actions outlined in this plan are extremely important to solving some of the deepest challenges in Grand County, but many of the organizations, including those involved with writing this plan, do not have the capacity to also implement it. Like many rural communities, the Moab area is isolated and constantly struggling to find more funding and resources. The residents, local government, and nonprofits have realized in many cases that to accomplish something, they must do it themselves and cannot wait for outside help. The gravity and longevity of implementing a plan to address intergenerational poverty in Grand County is a task that no individual organization in Grand County can add to its current workload. Therefore, funding a position to oversee the coordination of the county's health and early childhood development goals is necessary and would fit naturally with the work done at the hospital to create a parenting involvement program. Page 24 of 239 4-1 Presentations Proposed Services Service to be provided To whom in the family will the service be offered? Can your target families currently access this service? Organization(s) providing the service Other Pertinent Information Early Childhood Development Improved access to in -home services (mental/behavioral/physical health) for parents and children IGP parents and children No - Grand County is one of the four counties in the state of Utah that does not receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funding for evidence- based home visitation program. Headstart and SEEIP currently have limited but existing programs to provide this service. MRH has begun the process of creating a parenting involvement program (PIP), but it is not yet available to the community. As the most recent IWRC annual report states, Grand County is one of only four counties "with high rates of children experiencing intergenerational poverty [that] lack[s] home visitation services;" the lack of TANF funding is one of many crucial missing pieces to solve the county's struggle for improved healthcare. MRH is starting a program but still cannot fully address this need in the county. Though MRH will be the main organization providing this service, it will be screening and linking parents to services from, but not limited to: USU Extension, DWS, MFHC, SEEIP, Headstart, Four Corners Mental Health, MVMC Health Support Child Health and Development Interactive System (CHADIS) testing starting in the MRH and get all providers to participate in this program All children and families in Grand County Mostly no, in progress MRH, MFHC, Health Dept., Four Corners, dental care providers This program is currently under development and is time -limited because the Cambia grant funding the service will eventually go away. ACE and CHADIS screenings performed by all primary care service providers All children age 0-18 Yes, but limited MRH, other primary care providers Grand County is currently facing a shortage of primary care doctors, which could hamper the efforts of expanding this service. The community receives almost two million visitors annually, many of whom are served by primary and emergency care physicians — this drives the doctor and/or nurse to patient ratio substantially lower than Census - based reports show. Expanding this service may prove to be difficult because many of the primary providers do not have the funding or capacity to add this service at this time. Page 25 of 239 4-1 Presentations Funding a full-time care coordinator to enhance and All children and families in Grand No Through this plan development process, Grand County has come to the firm support collaboration between health agencies in order to improve continuity of care County conclusion that an additional person or organization is extremely necessary in order to ensure that continued collaboration and progress is happening in the organizations associated with this document. It is clear that in several areas, this county, like many of Utah's rural counties, gets overlooked when considered for state funding though they are in dire need of it. There is no listed organization to provide this service, but the Grand County development team strongly agrees that some kind of state funding should be allocated to create this position for counties that need it. Aligning Services, Systems, and Resources 1 Linking and Aligning Services Service 1 Service 2 Will be linked how? Early Childhood Development & Health MRH's proposed parenting involvement program (PIP) All other additional services, based on the needs of the family Screenings and referral processes Countywide service -provider evaluation system Accountability amongst service providers A full-time position or organization must be created to oversee the implementation of this plan and hold associated organizations accountable. Page 26 of 239 4-1 Presentations Linking and Aligning Policies and Systems Policy or System 1 Policy or System 2 Linkage/Alignment Needed IGP CTC, LIC, Homeless Coordinating Committee, etc. Grand County currently has several committees that serve to streamline and improve services related to poverty. This new IGP group, in conjunction with CTC or another service group, could consolidate the number of committees and multitude of meetings that many of the associated service providers regularly attend. This linkage applies to both early childhood development and health services. Early Childhood Development Screening and intake systems Release of information policies Permission from parents to share information between organizations Release of information form for Organization A Release of information form for Organization B Each federal, state, grant, and other release of information form has different, specific requirements, creating a double edged sword that protects the identity of the patient yet makes it harder for organizations to collaborate to treat the same patient. A partnership agreement amongst service providers in Grand County would be one way to streamline information sharing systems if it is possible to work through state and federal statutes. MRH's parenting involvement program Other agencies to whom patients are referred by MRH An evaluation system needs to be created to ensure that the hospital's program is effectively assessing the needs of families, and that the associated agencies are following through on the referrals being sent to them. Health Healthcare Provider Shortage Area (HPSA) designation/exemptions countywide for dental, mental, and primary care HPSA requirements, legislature City and County officials to lobby to state to get HPSA designation/exemptions for countywide dental, mental, and primary care. As is stated previously in the document, the community receives almost two million visitors annually, many of whom are served by primary and emergency care physicians — this drives the doctor and/or nurse to patient ratio substantially lower than Census -based reports show. The Census data does not accurately portray the needs of the community, so it is necessary that local officials lobby for this designation. Grand County currently has a HPSA designation for mental health, but it still needs the designation for primary and dental care. Expansion of Medicaid Legislature Current lack of political will, resources to serve community needs Page 27 of 239 4-1 Presentations Linking and Aligning Resources to Address Intergenerational Poverty Resource to Link Who controls this resource? Linkage/Alignment Needed Early Childhood Development Funding sources Legislature Legislature needs to better allocate funding sources to counties that have high rates of intergenerational poverty, and funding sources must be better linked with their beneficiaries to allow for more flexible uses. Eligibility criteria for programs for children age 0-5 (SEEIP, HeadStart, etc.) need to be expanded Legislature Income and disability qualification requirements limit the number of children served to the most extreme situations. Often, the moderately serious situations are the ones that can be most effectively changed with relatively little expenditure. Allowing these programs to serve the lowest 15% of children rather than the lowest 5-10% would be an efficient and easily traceable change. Health Funding for CHADIS screening programs CHADIS, Legislature A permanent funding source(s) is needed for parenting involvement, in -home services, and other programs essential to improving overall health in Grand County. Outreach and Marketing Many of the organizations that typically serve families experiencing intergenerational poverty in Grand County have been integral to creating this plan and understand importance of its contents. One of the key programs proposed from this process is MRH's parenting involvement program (PIP), which will target all new mothers and children. By working with every newborn and its family, the hospital ensures the dissemination of a consistent message from birth through childhood. Most of the organizations listed in this plan will be partners in the hospital's proposed PIP, sharing the same goals and message. Additionally, a countywide service -provider evaluation system will be created to ensure that proper communication is maintained among service providers and between service providers and the community. Page 28 of 239 4-1 Presentations IGP Logic Model: Early Childhood Development Inputs • Dept. of Child & Family Services (DCFS) • Dept. of Workforce Services (DWS) • Division of Human Services • Judicial system • Police & Sheriff's Dept. • Seekhaven • Utah State University (USU) • USU Extension programs • In -home nursing program • Four Corners Behavioral Health • Mental Health Providers Group • Healthcare systems • Moab Regional Hospital (MRH) • Grand County School District (GCSD) • Beacon Afterschool Program • Grand Area Mentoring • Current childcare providers • HeadStart • South East Early Intervention Program (SEEIP) • Moab Valley Multicultural Center • Faith leaders • Grand County Public Library • Communities that Care THEORY OF CHANGE: If Grand County gives parents the skills to support the healthy developement of children, they will raise a healthier generation that is less likely to continue the cycle of poverty. Outputs • GCSD requests age of ALL household members on registration form, not just those that are in Grand County school systems, to be put in school information system (SIS) • Improved access to in -home services for parents (mental, behavioral, and physical health) • Parenting invovlement programs (PIP) • peer parenting • prenatal, postnatal care • Shift the service model so more providers go to people's homes instead of asking people to come in to them • Increase access and availability to resources • Increase resources, period. • Create a program within USU's Masters of Social Work (MSW) program to offer volunteer hours for family in -home service visits • Fund a full-time care coordinator to enhance and support collaboration amongst relevant agencies in order to improve continuity of care in Grand County Outcomes Long -Term Parents obtain skills to support the healthy development of children and mitigate exposure to toxic stress Short -Term • Decreased domestic violence incidents in the presence of a child • Increased executive functioning (social/ emotional) levels • Decreased cases of neglect Evaluation Indicators • Number of cases at DCFS, calls to police, charge/conviction rates, court cases, Seekhaven calls • CJC (Children's Justice Center) • School records of reports of domestic violence cases, absence rates, testing levels at intake • Number of domestic violence cases to the emergency room (ER) • Number of inappropriate visits to the ER (non -emergency medical trips, etc.) • Public school testing at intake, ASQ-SE tests, HeadStart social/emotional questionnaire, SEEIP evaluations • Frequency of appointments with primary care providers • Participation rates in prenatal and postnatal parenting intervention programs (PIP) • Percentage of newborn children sent to SEEIP Page 29 of 239 4-1 Presentations IGP Logic Model: Health Inputs • Moab Regional Hospital • Moab Free Health Clinic • Lion's Club • Four Corners Behavioral Health • University Developmental Assessment Clinics (UDAC) • Moab Mental Health Providers Group • Primary care physicians • Communities that Care • Dept. of Workforce Services • Division of Human Services • Southeastern Utah Health Department • Utah Dept. of Health • Utah Navajo Health System • City and County Councils • Moab Valley Multicultural Center • Seekhaven • Grand County School District • Beacon Afterschool Program • Grand Area Mentoring • Current childcare providers • Head Start • South East Early Intervention Program • Utah State University • University of Utah • General community support THEORY OF CHANGE: If IGP children and adults have access to quality, timely, affordable healthcare, they will be able to thrive, not just survive in Grand County. Outputs • Exemption of Healthcare Provider Shortage Area (HPSA) • City and County Councils to lobby to state to get that designation/exemption • Expansion of Medicaid or other public health coverage program • City and County Councils to lobby to state • Work with local agencies to explore the idea of a new federally qualified health center (FQHC) or cash -pay clinic and/or expansion of the current free clinic in the Moab area • Support Cambia grant screening program starting in the MRH, get all providers to participate in this program • Ensure all primary care providers screen all children age 0-18 for ACE • Fund a full-time care coordinator to enhance and support collaboration amongst relevant agencies in order to improve continuity of care in Grand County • Increase percentage of primary care providers doing ACE (or doing a study and setting a baseline and realistic goal) Outcomes Alai Long -Term IGP children and adults have access to quality, timely, affordable healthcare. Short -Term Increased percentage of physicians administering ACE and other screening programs Decreased average ACE scores in IGP children Enhance and support collaboration between health agencies in order to improve continuity of care Evaluation Indicators • We get an exemption or a no for HPSA and/or Medicaid • FQHC exploratory committee is formed and decision made from feasibility study about FQHC/etc. options • Number of patients coming into referrals • Number of patients going to see providers for specific health care programs and participating in certain types of financial aid programs (financial aid programs, payment programs) • Number of successful referrals (referrals that lead to appointments) • Reduction in ACE scores • Number of ACE studies done that leads to referrals • Number of kids receiving follow-up services • Percentage of primary care providers performing ACE studies and writing referrals Page 30 of 239 4-1 Presentations Year One Work Plan Work Plan Action Steps Owner/Responsible Status (Behind, On Track, Complete) Q3, 2017 GCSD to change school registration forms to be more inclusive of nonconventional family structures Grand County School District (GCSD) Complete Connect with CTC to evaluate which aspects of IGP Plan can be aligned with or funded by CTC IGP team and CTC Coalition (Sarah Shea) On Track Schedule a webinar or strategy session with Tracy Gruber and/or DWS to discuss IGP plan, funding sources, etc. IGP Team Q4, 2017 Webinar on improving executive functioning testing in GC schools Kelly Vagts, GCSD On Track Based on CTC initial development sessions, design an action plan and/or agreement between IGP and CTC coalitions IGP and CTC Coalition Board members Q1, 2018 Hire or select an IGP coordinator Grand County, City of Moab Based on IGP/CTC coordinated plan, seek funding options for expanding and creating service options IGP Coordinator, IGP Team, CTC, MFHC Page 31 of 239 4-1 Presentations Approach community leaders (City, County, State representatives) about lobbying for HPSA designations IGP Coordinator, IGP Team, CTC Approach community leaders (City, County, State representatives) about lobbying for universal healthcare for community members (Medicaid or other) IGP Coordinator, IGP Team, CTC Begin baseline study of available services and needs in the community IGP Coordinator, IGP Team, CTC Q2, 2018 Market PIP and other new services available to the community; this will be an ongoing action item as new or expanded programs arise IGP Coordinator Ask CHADIS to pull clinic -wide reports to track changes MRH and/or CTC Coalition Design Parent Involvement Program (PIP) and other relevant service programs IGP Coordinator Page 32 of 239 4-1 Presentations Administration Partnerships Due to its remote location and population size, Grand County relies on a mix of local and regional resources for health and early childhood development services. An extensive resource guide has been appended to this document and includes many of the regional organizations with which Grand County partners. The group still needs funding or resources to create capacity for a lead organization to make headway on this effort. Moab Regional Hospital will be implementing some of the most important items in this plan, but it does not have the long-term staff or funding to manage the full work plan. Organization Key Contact Title Email Phone Services Provided/Role Subgroups South East Early Audrey Early Childhood (435)- Early childhood ECD, Intervention Program Graham Specialist graham4grand@yahoo.com 259 1114 education Health (SEEIP) Moab Free Health Executive (435) Healthcare services for Clinic (MFHC) Beth Joseph Director director@moabfreehealthclinic.org 259 1113 uninsured and underinsured Health Grand Area Daniel Director grandareamentoring@gmail.com (435) Youth mentoring ECD Mentoring McNeil 259-1516 program Southeastern Utah Donna djohnston@utaov (435) Healthcare services, ECD, Health Department Johnston Nurse 259-5602 financial assistance Health Temporary Assistance including Financial Assistance, SNAP, Child Department of Workforce Services Kelly Manager kthornto@utah.gov (435) Care, Medical, Unemployment ECD, (DWS) Thornton 719-2600 Insurance. Employment exchange activities including job readiness skills and job seeking skills development. Health Mental Health — Grand County School Kelly Vagts Therapist vagtsk@grandschools.org 719 4824 Mental health services Heap h District (GCSD) Grand County Grand County School District (GCSD) Melinda Snow Middle snowm@grandschools.org (435) 259-7350 Administrator at GCSD ECD, Health School Principal Moab Valley Financial and translation Multicultural Center (MVMC) Rhiana Medina Executive Director director@moabmc.org (435) 259-5444 assistance, crisis case management, community services ECD, Health Director of Moab Regional Community sarahs@mrhmoab.org (435) ECD, Hospital (MRH) Sarah Shea Relations 719 3683 Health services Health & Program Development Seekhaven Executive (435) Safe and secure shelter, safety planning, ECD, Family Crisis and Maddy Fisk Director maddy@seekhaven.org 259 2229 counseling referrals, Health Resource Center legal advocacy, Page 33 of 239 4-1 Presentations educational support, rental and employment assistance Grand County Zacharia Levine Community Development Director zlevine@grandcountyutah.net (435) 259-1371 Community and Economic Development ECD Utah State University — Moab (USU) Stephanie Dahlstrom stephanie.dahlstrom@usu.edu Higher education and programs Health Communication among Partners The next step towards implementing the Grand County Intergenerational Poverty Plan will be to consider the ways in which it can fit into the Communities that Care Coalition Plan and which ways it will differ. Several of the IGP partners will be attending the initial orientation sessions for the CTC Coalition over the coming months, and the group will reconvene to establish a formal communication plan. The proposed IGP Coordinator will be responsible for setting agendas, driving meetings, and implementing the plan. The IGP Development Team proposes that the City or the County formally hires this coordinator. As a local government employee, this person will be able to act as an unbiased mediator and coordinator of the service providers in Grand County and the liaison between the state and the local community. Communications to Stakeholders and the Community The IGP team plans to have open communication with the City and County Councils, Chamber of Commerce, Rotary Club, newspapers, and other pertinent community organizations. Once hired, the IGP Coordinator will work to implement the plan and communicate to all service providers and community and state leaders. The IGP team will reconvene to develop a formal communication plan after the CTC orientation in the coming months and again after an IGP Coordinator is hired. Anticipated Challenges and Barriers The single most difficult challenge to implementing this plan will be access to funding and resources. Grand County is a nonprofit -heavy community that is passionate about helping its residents, but it receives relatively little outside help and local donors and volunteers are spread too thin to commit to another long-term cause as substantial as ending intergenerational poverty. Partners have started working to addressing upcoming challenges; the development team is committed to acting on the issues listed in this document and have started to apply for additional funding sources, and many of the organizations have started the process of building capacity for creating or supporting new community programs. Without a doubt, though, the Grand County development team believes that to ensure successful execution, Grand County needs a formal coordinator and consistent funding from the Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission. Page 34 of 239 4-1 Presentations RESOURCE GUIDE - EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT Service Target Population (if any) Organization/Agency Finanical Asisstance Available? Contact Phone Location Website Child Resources Families with children with special care needs Integrated Services Program N/A (801) 584-8246 Salt Lake City, UT utah.gov Child Resources Families without health insurance Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Yes Tammy Berrie 1(877) 549-1663 Moab, UT utah.gov Child Resources Four Corners Community Behavioral Health Yes (435) 259-6131 Moab, UT fourcorners.ws Child Resources At -risk students Grand Area Mentoring N/A (435) 259-1516 Moab, UT grandschools.org Child Resources Low-income families with children pregnancy thorugh age 5 Rural Utah Child Development Head Start N/A Corina Spence 1(800) 841-2867 x501 Moab, UT Child Resources Low-income Supplemental Nutrition Assistance program (SNAP) Yes 1-800-331-4341 Moab, UT jobs.utah.gov Child Resources Family Support Center at the Christmas Box House Yes (435) 259-1658 Moab, UT facebook.com Child Resources Pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, portpartum women, children age 0-5 Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Yes (435) 259-5602 Moab, UT seuhealth.com Pregnancy Assistance Arches New Hope Pregnancy Center Yes (435) 259-5433 Moab, UT archesnewhope.org Pregnancy Assistance Women who cannot afford prenatal care Baby Your Baby Yes Tammy Berrie 1(800) 826-9662 Moab, UT babyyourbaby.org Pregnancy Assistance Green River Medical Center Yes (435) 564-3434 Green River, UT grmedical.org Page 35 of 239 4-1 Presentations Pregnancy Assistance Planned Parenthood Yes (970) 347-3002 Durango, CO plannedparenthood.org Pregnancy Assistance San Juan Clinic Yes (435) 587-5054 Monticello, UT sanjuanhealthservices.org Pregnancy Assistance Dept. of Workforce Services Yes Tammy Berrie (435) 719-3608 Moab, UT utah.gov Pregnancy Assistance Utah Navajo Health System Inc. Yes (435) 678-3601 Blanding, UT unhsinc.org Pregnancy Assistance Pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, portpartum women, children age 0-5 Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Yes (435) 259-5602 Moab, UT seuhealth.com Page 36 of 239 4-1 Presentations RESOURCE GUIDE - EDUCATION Service Target Population (if any) Organization/Agency Finanical Asisstance Available? Contact Phone Location Website Adolescent/Youth Services ESOL, adolescents and older Arches Education Center Yes Trisha Hedin (435) 260-8764 Moab, UT archeseducation.org Adolescent/Youth Services BEACON Afterschool Program Yes (435) 259-2767 Moab, UT moabbeacon.net Adolescent/Youth Services Families with children with special care needs Integrated Services Program N/A (801) 584-8246 Salt Lake City, UT utah.gov Adolescent/Youth Services Four Corners Community Behavioral Health Yes (435) 259-6131 Moab, UT fourcorners.ws Adolescent/Youth Services At -risk students Grand Area Mentoring N/A (435) 259-1516 Moab, UT grandschools.org Adolescent/Youth Services Young Life Moab Yes Silas Rappe, Kylie Thomas (435) 260-0285 Moab, UT younglife.org Adolescent/Youth Services Youth Garden Project Yes Delite Primus (435) 259-2326 Moab, UT youthgardenproiect.org Health Education Health Rising Wellness No Debra Cahill DOM, L.Ac. (970) 242-0020 Moab, UT & Grand Junction, CO healthrisingwellness.com Health Education Uninsured and Underinsured Moab Free Health Clinic Yes (435) 259-1113 Moab, UT moabfreehealthclinic.org Health Education Moab Valley Multicultural Center Yes (435) 259-5444 Moab, UT moabvalleymulticulturalcenter.org Health Education San Juan Clinic Yes (435) 587-5054 Monticello, UT sanjuanhealthservices.org Health Education SMART Recovery N/A David Simoni (435) 261-2731 Moab, UT smartrecovery.org Health Education Southeastern Utah District Health Department Yes (435) 259-5602 Moab, UT seuhealth.com Health Education Pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, portpartum women, children age 0-5 Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Yes (435) 259-5602 Moab, UT seuhealth.com Page 37 of 239 4-1 Presentations RESOURCE GUIDE - FAMILY ECONOMIC STABILITY Service Target Population (if any) Organization/Agency Finanical Asisstance Available? Contact Phone Location Disability Assistance Active Re -Entry Independent Living Program N/A (435) 259-0245 Moab, UT arecil.org Disability Assistance Low-income Supplemental Nutrition Assistance program (SNAP) Yes 1-800-331-4341 Moab, UT jobs.utah.gov Disability Assistance Dept. of Workforce Services Yes Tammy Berrie (435) 719-3608 Moab, UT utah.gov Disability Assistance Vocational Rehabilitation Services Division Yes (435) 259-4635 Moab, UT Financial Counseling Fair Credit Foundation (800) 351-4195 Salt Lake City, UT faircredit.org Financial Counseling Families with children Family Employment Program (TANF) Yes 1-877-313-4717 Salt Lake City, UT utah.gov Financial Counseling Moab Valley Multicultural Center Yes (435) 259-5444 Moab, UT moabvalleymulticulturalcenter.org Financial Counseling Victims of domestic violence & sexual assault Seekhaven Family Crisis and Resource Center Yes (435) 259-2229 Moab, UT seekhaven.org Food Assistance Dept. of Workforce Services Yes (435) 719-2600 Moab, UT utah.gov Food Assistance Grand County Food Bank Yes (435) 259-6456 Moab, UT utah.gov Food Assistance Moab Valley Multicultural Center Yes (435) 259-5444 Moab, UT moabvalleymulticulturalcenter.org Food Assistance Southeastern Utah District Health Department Yes (435) 259-5602 Moab, UT seuhealth.com Food Assistance Low-income Supplemental Nutrition Assistance program (SNAP) Yes 1-800-331-4341 Moab, UT (obs.utah.gov Food Assistance The Salvation Army Yes Sara Melnicoff (435) 259-0910 Moab, UT salvationarmyusa.org Food Assistance Pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, portpartum women, children age 0 5 Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Yes (435) 259-5602 Moab, UT seuhealth.com Housing Assistance Dept. of Workforce Services Yes (435) 719-2600 Moab, UT utah.gov Page 38 of 239 4-1 Presentations Housing Assistance low-income homeowners & renters Home Energy Assistance Target (HEAT) Program Yes (435) 259-6362 Moab, UT utah.gov Housing Assistance Moab Area 2017 Affordable Housing Plan N/A Zacharia Levine (435) 259-1371 Moab, UT moabhousingplan.com Housing Assistance Moab Area Housing Resource Guide N/A Zacharia Levine (435) 259-1371 Moab, UT moabhousing.com Housing Assistance Moab Valley Multicultural Center Yes (435) 259-5444 Moab, UT moabvalleymulticulturalcenter.org Housing Assistance Victims of domestic violence & sexual assault Seekhaven Family Crisis and Resource Center Yes (435) 259-2229 Moab, UT seekhaven.org Housing Assistance The Salvation Army Yes Sara McInicoff (435) 259-0910 Moab, UT salvationarmyusa.org Housing Assistance Seniors Vista Mesa Assisted Living Residence N/A Tiffany Cross (970) 564-1888 (970) 570-8207 Cortez, CO vistamesaliving.com Insurance Enrollment Families without health insurance Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Yes Tammy Berrie 1(877) 549-1663 Moab, UT utah.gov Insurance Enrollment Uninsured and Underinsured Moab Free Health Clinic Yes (435) 259-1113 Moab, UT moabfreehealthclinic.org Insurance Enrollment Dept. of Workforce Services Yes Tammy Berrie (435) 719-3608 Moab, UT utah.gov Insurance Enrollment Utah Health Decisions Insurance Services Yes Charlie Kulander (435) 260-2147 Moab, UT utahhealthdecisions.com Page 39 of 239 4-1 Presentations RESOURCE GUIDE - HEALTH Service Target Population (if any) Organization/Agency Finanical Asisstance Available? Contact Phone Location Website Alternative Medicine Awakening Heart Yes Judith Lee (435) 260-8667 Moab, UT Alternative Medicine Health Rising Wellness No Debra Cahill DOM, L.Ac. (970) 242-0020 Moab, UT & Grand Junction, CO healthrisingwellness.com Alternative Medicine Moab Acupuncture Clinic No Flora Najafi L.Ac.Dil NCCAOM (435) 259-8483 Moab, UT moabacupuncture.com Alternative Medicine Morning Glory Massage No Lee Truesdell, LMT (435) 259-0302 Moab, UT massagemoab.com Alternative Medicine Phoenix Rising Yes Dr. Donald T. Leathers, ND (435) 259-8123 Moab, UT phoenixrisingmoab.com Alternative Medicine Spa Moab No (435) 259-7726 Moab, UT spamoab.com Alternative Medicine Our Community Acupuncture No Tawn Jorie Lee (435) 210-0667 Moab, UT Alternative Medicine Seniors Vista Mesa Assisted Living Residence N/A Tiffany Cross (970)564-1888 (970) 570-8207 Cortez, CO vistamesaliving.com Dental Care Arches Dental Clinic No (435) 259-4333 Moab, UT archesdentalclinicut.com Dental Care Comfort Dental No (970) 255-1222 Grand Junction, CO comfortdental.com Dental Care Green River Medical Center Yes (435) 564-3434 Green River, UT grmedical.org Dental Care Moab Smiles No DDSrill M. Hugentobler, (435) 259-7418 Moab, UT moabsmiles.com Dental Care Moab Dental Center No Jeffery Cornelius, DDS (435) 259-5378 Moab, UT moabdental.com Dental Care Veterans Moab Veteran's Outreach Telehealth Clinic No (435) 719-4144 Moab, UT Dental Care Parkway Dental No (435) 201-6940 Moab, UT parkwaydentalmidvale.com Dental Care Red Rock Dental No Dr. Norman C Barber (435) 259-4059 Moab, UT moabredrockdental.com Dental Care Utah Navajo Health System Inc. Yes (435) 678-3601 Blanding, UT unhsinc.org Eye Care Children without Insurance Lion's Club Yes (435) 259-1721 Moab, UT Eye Care Moab Eyeworks N/A Tom Lord (435) 259-9492 Moab, UT moabeyeworks.com Eye Care Todd Hackney Optometry No (435) 259-9441 Moab, UT toddhackneyod.com Hospice Care Seniors Vista Mesa Assisted Living Residence N/A Tiffany Cross (970)564-1888 (970) 570-8207 Cortez, CO vistamesaliving.com Hospice Care Seniors Grand County Hospice Yes (435) 719-3772 Moab, UT Immunization Green River Medical Center Yes (435) 564-3434 Green River, UT grmedical.org Immunization Moab Family Medicine No (435) 259-7121 Moab, UT moabfamilymedicine.com Immunization Moab Regional Medical Clinic No (435) 719-5500 Moab, UT amhmoab.org Page 40 of 239 4-1 Presentations Immunization Veterans Moab Veteran's Outreach Telehealth Clinic No (435) 719-4144 Moab, UT Immunization San Juan Clinic Yes (435) 587-5054 Monticello, UT sanluanhealthservices.org Immunization Southeastern Utah District Health Department Yes (435) 259-5602 Moab, UT seuhealth.com Immunization Utah Navajo Health System Inc. Yes (435) 678-3601 Blanding, UT unhsinc.org Medical Care Seniors Canyonlands Care Center Yes (435) 719-4400 Moab, UT canyonlandscarecenter.org Medical Care Colorado West Dermatology No (970) 245-1500 Grand Junction, CO wecareaboutyourskin.com Medical Care Dr. Andrews Family Practice and Grand County Wellness Center Yes (435) 259-4466 Moab, UT moabfamilyhealth.com Medical Care Green River Medical Center Yes (435) 564-3434 Green River, UT grmedical.org Medical Care Moab Family Medicine No (435) 259-7121 Moab, UT moabfamilymedicine.com Medical Care Uninsured and Underinsured Moab Free Health Clinic Yes (435) 259-1113 Moab, UT moabfreehealthclinic.org Medical Care Moab Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Yes (435) 210-1985 Moab, UT moabphysicaltherapy.com Medical Care Moab Regional Hospital Yes (435) 719-3500 Moab, UT mrhmoab.org Medical Care Moab Regional Medical Clinic No (435) 719-5500 Moab, UT mrhmoab.org Medical Care Veterans Moab Veteran's Outreach Telehealth Clinic No (435) 719-4144 Moab, UT Medical Care Neurology of Eastern Utah No (435) 781-8464 Vernal, UT ashleyregional.com Medical Care Planned Parenthood Yes (970) 347-3002 Durango, CO plannedparenthood.org Medical Care Red Valley Chiropractic & Massage No (435) 259-0123 Moab, UT moabchiropracticmassage.com Medical Care San Juan Clinic Yes (435) 587-5054 Monticello, UT sanjuanhealthservices.org Medical Care San Juan County Hospital Yes (435) 587-2116 Monticello, UT sanluanhealthservices.org Medical Care Families with children age 0-3 South East Early Intervention Program Yes (435)-637-3950 Price, UT cpdusu.org Medical Care Utah Navajo Health System Inc. Yes (435) 678-3601 Blanding, UT unhsinc.org Medical Care Seniors Vista Mesa Assisted Living Residence N/A Tiffany Cross (970) 564-1888 (970) 570-8207 Cortez, CO vistamesaliving.com Mental Health Four Corners Community Behavioral Health Yes (435) 259-6131 Moab, UT fourcorners.ws Mental Health Green River Medical Center Yes (435) 564-3434 Green River, UT grmedical.org Mental Health Gregory Lee Hood, Counselor, MA, LPC Yes Gregory Lee Hood (832) 432-7658 Moab, UT psychologytoday.com Mental Health InterAct Clubhouse Yes (435) 259-7340 Moab, UT fourcorners.ws Page 41 of 239 4-1 Presentations Mental Health James A. Ferro, PhD Psychology No James A. Ferro (435) 260-1138 Moab, UT intermountainhealthcare.org Mental Health Kira Schneider, Counselor No Kira Schneider (435) 260-1767 Moab, UT Mental Health Uninsured and Underinsured Moab Free Health Clinic Yes (435) 259-1113 Moab, UT moabfreehealthclinic.org Mental Health Veterans Moab Veteran's Outreach Telehealth Clinic No (435) 719-4144 Moab, UT Mental Health San Juan Clinic Yes (435) 587-5054 Monticello, UT sanjuanhealthservices.org Mental Health SMART Recovery N/A David Simoni (435) 261-2731 Moab, UT smartrecovery.org Mental Health Sunrise Counseling Yes Antje Rath (435) 719-5550 Moab, UT antjerath.com Mental Health Utah Navajo Health System Inc. Yes (435) 678-3601 Blanding, UT unhsinc.org Page 42 of 239 4-1 Presentations Agenda Summary Sheet Council Meeting Date: July 25, 2017 #: 6-1 Title: Request for Amplified Music at Old City Park on Saturday, July 29, 2017. Fiscal Impact: None Staff Presenter(s): Carmella Galley Department: Administration Applicant: Sarah Shea, Moab Regional Hospital Background/Summary: Click here to enter text. Use of amplified sound equipment at Old City Park is not permitted without special permission of the City Council. The Moab Regional Hospital is requesting amplified music at their Employee Appreciation BBQ. Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Staff Recommendation: City staff recommends approval of the request. Approval is subject to compliance with all Parks Policies, which provides that approved sound amplification shall not extend beyond 9 pm. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve the request for amplified music at Old City Park for the Moab Regional Hospital BBQ on July 29, 2017." Attachment(s): • Written request from applicant Page 43 of 239 6-1 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses " " " MOAB VALLEY HEALTHCARE Moab Regional Hospital 450 W. Williams Way PO Box 998 Moab, UT 84532 ph: (435) 719-3500 www,mrhmoab.org Moab City Council 217 E. Center Street Moab, UT 84532 July 6, 2017 Dear Mayor Sakrison and Moab City Council members: Moab Regional Hospital will be hosting its second annual Employee Appreciation BBQ at Old City Park on Saturday, July 29th, from 4:30-8:30pm. We have reserved the park and have paid all fees associated with our reservation. We respectfully request council approval to have amplified sound at our event. We would like to have a DJ help facilitate event activities and play music for attendees. We will discontinue use of the amplified sound system at 8pm. If you have any questions regarding the event or the sound system usage, please contact Sarah Shea at (435) 719-3683. Thank you, Zece&)gee& Sarah Shea Director of Community Relations Moab Regional Hospital sarahs@mrhmoab.org (435) 719-3683 6-1 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses Page 44 of 239 Agenda Summary Sheet Council Meeting Date: July 25, 2017 #: 6-2 Title: Approval of Special Event, Retail Beer License and Fee Waiver for the Humane Society of Moab Valley's Barktoberfest to be held at the MARC on October 14, 2017 Fiscal Impact: None Staff Presenter(s): Carmella Galley Department: Administration Applicant: Humane Society of Moab Valley Background/Summary: This is a first time event for the Humane Society. It will be held in conjunction with the MARC's Art Festival in October. However it will only be held on the last day of the event. The enclosed area on the side of the MARC will be used. The event is a fund raiser for the Humane Society. The following approvals are needed: 1. Approval of Special Event License 2. Approval of a Class IV Retail Beer License 3. Approval of Local Consent 4. Approval of a Fee Waiver Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the event with the following condition, requested by the Moab Valley Fire District, that all ingresses and egresses to the area be accessible by emergency personnel if necessary. Recommended Motion: I move to approve the Humane Society's Barktoberfest to be held October 14, 2017 at the MARC. I further move to approve/deny the requested event fee waiver in the amount of $200. Attachment(s): - Event Application - Retail Beer License Application - Local Consent Application - MARC Event Application - Fee Waiver Request Page 45 of 239 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses DATE PAID: 6 AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT No.: 9 0 o ao oV3 CITY OF MOAB RETAIL BEER` LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB ❑ CLASS I FEE: ❑ CLASS II FEE: ❑ PRIVATE CLUB ❑ CLASS III FEE: 'Sr CLASS IV FEE: LICENSE #: $200.00 $200.00 $720.00 $90.00 $90.00 APPLICANT'S PERSONAL INFORMATION FULL NAME: ` HOME ADDRESS: SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: ram, ethaCc.ez,, Sha_cJ DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE: BUSINESS INFORMATION HOME PHONE: 0662 3914 5-311`1 CITY: STATE: LIT 71P: p� DATE OF BIRTH: BUSINESS NAME: T i WirAf\V ('i_ Caol, C hrtOAL vAU-,q BUSINESS ADDRESS: G SCO SrVND 120Pd) BUSINESS MAILING' ADDRESS: to CITY: IYI 0141{3 SALES T.AX ID #: BUSINESS PHONE: 1/13,-S - QS9 - -1 .810 2 STATE: VA i ZIP: Fj4S3 WARNING!! ALL LICENSES, EXCEPT CLASS III, REQUIRE A STATE LICENSE! STATE APPROVAL COULD TAKE 30 DAYS OR MORE TO PROCESS! CONTACT THE STATE NOW! THIS APPLICATION IS MADE FOR A LICENSE TO SELL BEER` UNDER THE FOLLOWING LICENSE: (CHECK ONE) ❑ CLASS I ❑ CLASS II ❑ PRIVATE CLUB ❑ CLASS III CLASS IV Retail License shall entitle Licensee to sell Beer only on the premises licensed on draught and in original containers, for consumption on or off the premises, in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and the Ordinances of the City. Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer in the original containers, on the premises for consumption on the premises, in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and Ordinances of the City, and shall be issued solely to Restaurants, Cafes and other establishments whose primary purpose is the dispensing of food. Same conditions as Class I and Class II Beer Licenses. Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed in original containers, for consumption off the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and the Ordinances of the City. Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed on draught and in original containers, for consumption on the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and the Ordinances of the City limited to the dates specified. 1 • Will yo also ewe liquor, wine or heavy beer (over 3.2% by weight)? ❑ No ES (Requires `Local Consent' approved by City Council prior to State approval.) 2. List brands of beer proposed to be sold by the applicant within the City of Moab: `Beer application is for 3.21/4 by weight only. Also requires a Stale license. Page 46 of 239 U7/U'I/14 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses CLASS IV SPECIAL EVENT BEER LICENSE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATON I . Please specify the dates, times, location, nature and description of the proposed event: OCT() 1 itrh Dc-r4 to noev-k +0 ci p►-�, 1i1/9-(2_ G too NOYA--IA-, I WL.OrA -- Ss) d1Z. � AA-ek tryr-t- erk. on _ Lt't J d_..(2- of ' towI 1 Val.S t freD JetA.Urvt- -fo( Shy V 154 rv6?-.FES1- 2. Please provide a floor plan or detailed description of the following: a. The sites from which you propose that beer be sold or served, including all dispensing points. Dispensing points include storage areas, booths, tables, bars, and other areas set apart for the sale of beer; b. The areas in which you propose that beer be allowed to be consumed; 3. Please state the purpose of the association or entity conducting the event: 44IA,VIrk t, i/ve S6r�vi of YYrca- to VGi,i,LF!S cc), d.S2S eaLLGt Ich 4k2Ck• '±' gt-1,1 huAri 0,44.e inept- vw2 /►t ogi ryi �� r sue[-ek_, ,Y a vvi vial S rcA/t cOs- vAio Cos-} S c vu 4. 1 Ectra.F) L SilLeat--) hereby grant Moab City Officials, including but not limited to, law enforcement officers or City code enforcement officials, an unrestricted right to enter the premises of this event, during the event to take place on (tt I t441.0; starting at i2 PM, and located at ill _ ) G for purposes of monitoring compliance with all license terms and City ordinances. SIGNED: STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF GRAND ) SS DATE: 0- 1 - 0407 7 9 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME BY SQ. rek-L- 1.. SA c ON THIS ot7f DAY OF CARMELLA GALLEY M 1_ Notary Public �1 State of Utah `' , Comm. No. 686544 I My Comm. Expires Dec 28, 2019 F , ?0i �. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 47 of 239 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses RETAIL BEER LICENSE APPLICATION Submit completed application and attachments to the City Treasurer for processing. The applicant represents that they possess all the qualifications of a licensee as set forth in Section 32, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 and that they will faithfully comply with and have faithfully complied with the Utah Liquor Control Act. This application is submitted to the City of Moab as an inducement for the issuance of a retailer's business beer license in accordance with Section 32, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953. The undersigned applicant hereby agrees and promises that if such beer license is granted, the applicant will faithfully comply with all provisions of the Utah Liquor Control Act and regulations of the Utah Liquor control Commission adopted pursuant thereto, and the ordinances of the City of Moab, and in particular that they will faithfully comply with Section 32, Chapter 6 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 relating to reporting and payment of excise tax, and with regulation 4 relating to advertising, regulation 4-A relating to labeling and advertising, and regulation 5 relating to Unfair competition and unlawful practice. Applicant's Signature STATE OF UTAH ) : ss COUNTY OF GRAND ) SarGti/u , being first duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says: That he/she is the applicant above named; that he /she has read the foregoing application, and knows and understands the contents thereof; that the same is true to his/her own knowledge. i4 Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 6.7% day of �i , CARMELLA GALLEY Notary Public State of Utah Comm. No. 885544 My Comm. Expires Dec 28 2018 Notary Public Page 48 of 239 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT Na.: CITY OF MOAB SPECIA1 EVENT LICENSE APPUCAT1ON 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 ! FAX (435) 259.4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT FEE: Level 1-$200.00 Level 2-S400.00 LICENSE #: ZONE: NAME OF EVENT; /2jA�% � 11 EST DESCRIPTION OF EvExr: LOCATION OF EVENT: PREMISES TO BE USED: MoP t{tORE,4TlcsNI TEMPORARY STRUCTURES TO BE USED (IF ANY): 1...t p a ) Y 1 Y ` . s �[ � ( J DATE(S) AND TIME(S) OF EVENT: ) ZJ� 1st�-;'1 ) a[ry-4- ti— ANTICIPATED # OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: EVENT SPONSDfi 5 NAME: SPoKsowSADDRESS: °Igo sPrt DR A-1 . CITY: m C,* STATE UT zip: &14 02_ CONTACT'S EMAIL ADDRESS. YY1OG,i411(iL(rnai/ -e- � ��� 1- CCU THIS F+ fS AN APPUCATION FOR A SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY STAFF OR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL • ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE OTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE • : LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED E1VI(E HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID SPECIAL EVENT STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB M NUKE(a) CITY SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED LOCATION AND SPONSOR. State of Utah County of Grand ULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB Ore CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF EIN IS TRUE. 11VVE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON -TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED spawn, of Spanaor Date ) ) SS SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before rner this NOTARY PUBLIC SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS! Rer. 6r2017 Page 49 of 239 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses ATTACH SITE PLAN FOR THE EVENT GROUNDS (IF APPLICABLE). ATTACH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDICATED BELOW: >— LICENSE APPROVALS CITY STAFF 0 APPROVED O DISAPPROVED REASON(S): LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: SIGNATURE OF CITY STAFF I MOAB CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL REQUIRED 0 NO 0 YES AGENDA DATE' 0 APPROVED 0 DISAPPROVED REASON(S): EVENT COST RECOVERY SURCHARGE: SPECIAL. CONDITIONS: Page 50 of 239 Rev:4/2017 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses MAR MOAB ARTS & RECREATION CENTER CITY OF MOAB ALCOHOL EVENT USE LICENSE For valid consideration, the City of Moab ("the City') and 11/1 Rh,-- LIT y c r /' d d 6 Y A LLel ("the Licensee") agree to authorize the use of the Moab Arts & Recreation Center ("MARC") for an event in which alcoholic beverages will be served in accordance with the terms of this license, City Code, and Utah state law. The event is permitted, subject to the following terms: I. Specific Conditions / 1. Dates & times of operation: OCTQ 5 L i2 14t oZ.0) / neq--4 . 2. Description of event: I3/4-2 KT /2: ST- F•3-,D 4 L5 f f 7 P 4S /n � 3. Authorized number of participants: 4. Alcoholic beverages to be served: 3. j. -6; --fir'` V.1 t.) L II. General Conditions 1. Alcohol is authorized to be served at private social gatherings, which are defined as any social, business, or recreational event limited in attendance to persons designated in advance, by invitation, and their guests (weddings, birthday parties). No admission fee or charge for the serving of alcoholic beverages shall be collected. Weekend private parties require MARC staff presence. Current fee: $15/serving hour or included in the weekend private party rate ($100/hr.). 2. Alcohol sales (cash bar, ticketed events serving alcohol, fundraisers) are authorized for public events with a UT Single Event Permit or Temporary Special Event Beer Permit, City of Moab Special Event Business License, and any applicable City of Moab Alcohol Licenses. Renters must provide copies of the permit and licenses to the MARC office at least 2 weeks before the event. Current fee: none, but nonprofit rental discounts do not apply to events serving alcohol. 3. The Licensee shall be a person at least twenty-one years (21) of age or older. The Licensee is personally responsible for compliance with all provisions of this License and with all applicable City and State laws governing the serving and distribution of alcoholic beverages. All persons who serve alcoholic beverages at the event shall do so under the supervision and direction of the Licensee, who shall be personally responsible for compliance with this agreement. 4. The following serving restrictions apply: a. No person shall allow or permit the serving of alcoholic beverages to any person under the age of twenty-one years (21). b. The Licensee shall provide non-alcoholic beverages and food in sufficient quantity and variety to provide for the expected number of guests and the duration of the event. c. The Licensee shall assure that no alcoholic beverages are served to any person who is visibly intoxicated. A "visibly intoxicated" person is a person who exhibits all or any of the following: slurred speech, Page 51 of 239 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses bloodshot eyes, an obvious odor of alcohol, unsteady balance, disheveled clothing or appearance, loud, boisterous or inappropriate speech or conduct, or a person who has been observed to consume significant amounts of alcohol, given the person's weight and the passage of time. d. The Licensee shall provide sufficient security, as needed, to prevent the unauthorized entry of persons not invited to the event and the removal of disorderly or intoxicated persons. e. Ali persons serving alcohol shall be at least twenty-one years (21) of age. 5. Licensee agrees to use all necessary care to prevent loss, injury, or death to persons or property, including the property of the City, occurring, directly or indirectly, from the use of the MARC or the serving of alcoholic beverages to guests or other persons. Licensee shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, damages, or other losses, including costs of defense, occurring directly or indirectly from the following: a. injury or death to persons or damage to personal or real property occurring as a result of an alcohol related motor vehicle accident; b. injury or death to event participants, guests, employees of Licensee, volunteers, employees of the City, or members of the public related to the consumption of alcohol by persons at the Licensed event; c. damage to real or personal property of the City or any other person occurring as a result of the actions of event participants, i.e., vandalism or negligent destruction of property. 6. Employees of the MARC may not have any contact with the alcoholic beverage served and may not serve any alcoholic beverage to any guests of your event while on duty or acting in an official capacity on behalf of the city. 7. The licensee shall adhere to the City noise ordinance of 10 p.m. and facility closure at 11 pm. 8. Any MARC Staff may enter the premises of any event permitted at any time to determine compliance with all applicable laws and conditions. Any staff member who deems than an event is out of compliance with applicable laws and conditions shall have the authority to curtail the event. 9. Noncompliance with any of the terms and conditions of this permit may be just cause for refusing the Licensee future alcohol permits. Approved and Accepted: Licensee(s): Signat re Copy of Permits Required? (Print Name) Date Yes No Copies received: DABC UT Single Event Alcohol or Temporary Special Event Beer Permit City of Moab Alcohol License (City of Moab Treasurer's Office) City of Moab Special Event Business License ***All permits & licenses must be received at least 2 weeks prior to the event. The City of Moab representative: Signatur Date: /}1 /M.YY.l Co n i7 (Print Name) Dat (Print Name) Dat Page 52 of 239 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses SINGLE EVENT PERMIT Local Consent PURPOSE: Local business licensing authority provides written consent to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission to issue an event permit to an organization for the purposes of storage, sale, offer for sale, furnish, or allow the consumption of an alcoholic product on the event premises AUTHORITY: Utah Code 32B-9-201 a/ T`% Q r %10A-_.0 , [City [ ] Town [ ] County hereby Applicant Event Event On the during Local business license authority grants its consent to the issuance of a temporary single event permit license to: Entity/Organization: / G( ai f9-A.) E. S—D G j L- ry a l=" 10)©4 0 V Lr 1 [ e CI A Name: .0 4-er.; -7o 6�_-e_' �r location address: /// Z: a5T /pD i---i r3 Zryi- fni?Ali l/tT71-1,1-- S45, z_ sired city state zip day(s) 64 e :4- PT of TD231 , _2_61 dais, _ month year the hours of l 9. n n () r) .f'o q ,pursuant to the provision of Utah Code 32B-9. dented hours from — m 6„, We recommend this entity as conducting a civic or community enterprise's [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not providing a recommendation *As Fart of local consent required by 32B-8-201(1)(c), the locality may provide a recommendation as to whether the entity is conducting a civic or community enterprise. A civic or community enterprise means a function that is in the nature of a temporary special event such as a social, business, religious, political, governmental, educational, recreational, cultural, charitable, athletic, theatrical, scholastic, artistic, or scientific event. A "civic or community enterprise" generally is a gathering that brings members of a community together for the common good. Single event permits may not be issued to or obtained by an entity or organization for the purpose of avoiding or attempting to avoid the requirement of state retail alcohol licensing. Authorized Signature Name/Title Date ------- - --- This is a suggested format. A locally produced city, town, or county form is acceptable. AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2015, LOCAL CONSENT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE DABC BY THE APPLICANT. Page 53 of 239 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses (---- 10 r 3 9 qTc.� frLac; r C� 100 EA -sr 1-4 gc- ; ,--) 6- oil CAST 011 I00NaIZ-nf ) T 5 roar 1,36 o) ►J Fe vide 1 tA)b 0) Lr1 FC- Ac..E. STD re A C.6- SeRJ; NUT fro VI NAcC I ° O IN) O�T Page 54 of 239 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses Pumane Society of Moab Valley June 29, 2017 Carmella Galley Executive Administrative Assistant 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Dear Carmella, 956 Sand Flats Rd. Moab, UT 84532 435-259-HUMANE www.moabpets.org Humane Society of Moab Valley submitted the special event application for our October 14th fundraiser, Barktoberfest. We are a non-profit organization and fundraisers such as this event help generate a significant part of the Humane Society's budget. We would like to request that the City of Moab waive the $200.00 application fee if possible. Our organization's mission is to promote and provide responsible care for our community's animals. Before HSMV was founded in 1999, over 45% of dogs and 85% of cats were euthanized in Grand County every year. We achieved No -Kill status in 2004. • HSMV has found families for more than 2,000 animals • Assisted local families to spay/neuter more than 4,600 owned dogs and cats • Spayed/neutered more than 3,000 community cats in our Trap/neuter/Return program • Distributes 8,000 lbs. of cat and dog food for feral & community cats each year • Distributes more than 600 pounds of free pet food to those in need each year • Volunteers & our board of Trustees contribute over 6,000 hours each year. Thank you for your consideration and please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Leigh Ryan Leigh Ryan Executive Director Humane Society of Moab Valley Page 55 of 239 6-2 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: July 25, 2017 #: 6- Title: Approval of a Vendor License for Eduardo Rodriguez, d.b.a. Tacos Moab, located at 83 South Main Street for a term of July 25, 2017 to July 24, 2018 Date Submitted: July 11, 2017 Staff Presenter: Jennie Ross, Treasurer Department: Treasurer/Planning Background/Summary: This applicant is seeking approval for a Mexican food cart located on the Canyonlands Trading Post property at 83 S Main Street. The applicant is requesting an increase in the number of tables and seating. Code section 5.64.060(g) states, "Seating may be provided as approved by City Council to include a table and up to six seats. Seating areas shall be located adjacent to the display and in no case exceed forty square feet in area". The applicant is requesting an exception to allow four tables and sixteen chairs. Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Staff Recommendation: City staff recommends approval of a Private Property Vendor License, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 am to 10:00 pm 2. Approve the requested exception for a total of four tables and sixteen chairs as shown on the site plan Recommended Motion: "I move to approve a food vendor license for Eduardo Rodriguez, d.b.a. Tacos Moab to be located at 83 S Main Street." Attachment(s): Vendor Application Page 56 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses Received 1-1(-,20I1 OWNER'S ADDRESS: DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT NO.: CITY OF MOAB VENDOR (REQUIRES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL — YEARLY) BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB FEE: $ (AS DETERMINED BY RESOLUTION) LICENSE ##: ZONE: C 3 BUSINESS NAME: Ta CO `D nei Q a-b 2 BUSINESS MAILING ADDRESS: _1 15 Kau beak f3itid 4i2b CITY: Moak STATE: VT-- - ZIP: $4/6- c7 2 2dd�( . roctrio3 azz. 2.atol • ram by§in0,s, will'be conducted: Attach ageerrem(; of authorization from property owner(s) including gptployete use of Restroom Facilities e-mail address: BUSINESS PHONE: y3S 2/0 83 S Main Si- . Yhaab I ,1 Bti6a2 Length of,tji e'arid/or specific dates business eillreinH 11;0' IA II j Proposed hours of operation: .1 q m 7 10 eyv...s.,,,E,4-ervIdci , 5 t,y" - SQVI Type (see definitions):)<Cart , Jehicle El Display Apparatus t w l Vendor Type (see definitions): d Street Vendor ❑ Sidewalk Vendor Nat Private Property Vendor ❑ Local VendoXFood Vendor Goods, wares, services or merchandise to be sold or offered for sale: Tacos ,-PpOd T BUSINESS OWNER'S NAME: Ea ka nio l` _ 0 J LLe_7 i I S KAN Gave. BIM 4:f 2 b OWNER'S DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY: OWNER'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: CITY: 1640 Ca) STATE: �1 PHONE: 1-1 20 - y7 41-7 ZIP: g CM � 2 DATE OF BIRTH: OPERATOR'S NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER): ikr,0 >191100.4S ) A1441,4 CO 1,49 et... PHONE: VL � & OPERATOR'S ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT FROM OWNER): VL` Q CITY: VL O- STATE: Vl-la ZIP: YL la SALES TAX ID ## (ATTACH PROOF FROM UTAH TAX COMMISSION): NAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: `41, ka.r01 Q vo d,ri 9 144 Z. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMPLETE THE ATTACHED VENDOR CHECKLIST AND BUSINESS LICENSE CHECKLIST ONCE YOUR COMPLETE APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, IT WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE VENDOR COMMITTEE. YOU WILL BE CONTACTED IF MORE INFORMATION /S REQUIRED TO PROCESS YOUR APPLICATION. YOUR FEE WILL BE CALCULATED AFTER COMMITTEE REVIEW. ONCE YOUR FEE 1S PAID, YOUR APPLICATION WILL THEN BE FORWARDED TO THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. PROCESSING AND APPROVAL MAY TAKE 4-6 WEEKS. SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS! Page 57 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A BUSINESS LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED ONLY WHEN ALL INSPECTIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED, ALL FEES HAVE BEEN PAID, ALL SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN COMMITTEE REVIEWED, STAFF APPROVED AND APPROVED BY THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL (IF APPLICABLE). ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. IT IS A CLASS C MISDEMEANOR TO OWN OR OPERATE A BUSINESS IN THE CITY OF MOAB WITHOUT A CURRENT BUSINESS LICENSE. I/WE TACO S M A� PLEASE PRINT NAME(S) BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. UWE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON -TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION AND OWNER. INVE AGREE TO FILE THE PROPER REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH. v'Fogir. Signature of Applicant State of Utah County of Grand ) ) § HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY S).fNe— 5•o , ao I Date SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this vs�A day ofcauLA . , r J (` 1 . NOTARY PUBLIC DEFINITIONS: BETH W. MCCUE Notary Public State of Utah Comm. No. 683276 My Comm. Explres May 28, 2019 > Cart: A small mobile cart or wagon that occupies a temporary location on a sidewalk or private property and is a humanly propelled wheeled vehicle that may contain food or other items for sale. o Stationary mobile cart. A cart having functional wheels and an axle that occupies one temporary location for a specified period of time. > Display apparatus: A nonpermanent structure such as a table, stand, wagon, tray, cart, tents with three sides open or other displays for the sale of goods, merchandise, food, wares or services on private property. Teepees shall not be considered a display apparatus and shall not be used for vending purposes. > Vehicle: A motorized vehicle used for displaying, storing or transporting of articles offered for sale by a Vendor and is currently licensed and registered by the Department of Motor Vehicles. > Vendor: Any person(s) engaged in the selling or offering for sale of food, beverages or merchandise on private property, public streets or sidewalks. The term "Vendor" includes (but does not include solicitor or soliciting activities as defined in Code Chapter 5.14* o Street Vendors, o Sidewalk Vendors, o Private property Vendors, and o Food Vendors, ➢ Local Vendor: Any person or any agent, or employee of any person who shall offer for sale to the public any goods, wares, services, merchandise or foodstuffs in or from any temporary structure, stand, or other approved place in the city and who has a permanent place of business within Moab City or Grand County. > Private Property Vendor: Any business that exhibits, displays, offers for sale or sells any food, beverages, goods, wares or merchandise from a cart, fixed cart, stationary mobile cart, display apparatus, or vehicle located in a described location on private property. Merchandise may be displayed on display apparatus as defined below. ➢ Sidewalk Vendor: Any person who sells or offers for sale from temporary locations for limited durations on any public sidewalk (excluding city parks and Mill Creek Parkway) any goods, wares, merchandise, services, food or beverages from a cart or by foot from a pack, basket or similar container, or hand held display. > Street Vendor: Any person travelling by vehicle, bicycle or other street -legal conveyance on public or private streets and who carries, conveys, or transports goods, wares or merchandise and offers them for sale. 11/27/2013 T:IBUSINESSLICENSESIBGS LIC FORMSIBus Lie - Vendor revison.docx Page 58 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses VENDOR APPLICATION CHECKLIST DESCRIPTION OF THE DISPLAY, APPARATUS OR CART (IF APPLICABLE) INCLUDING: ❑ DIMENSIONS OF THE STRUCTURE ❑ PHOTOGRAPHS OF STRUCTURE - ❑ SITE PLAN TO A SCALE OF NOT LESS THAN 1/8"EQUALS ONE FOOT SHOWING: THE COMPLETE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY WITH DIMENSIONS ❑ ALL STRUCTURES AND DIMENSIONS ❑ ALL DISTANCES FROM BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY LINES C� LOCATIONS OF ALL DRIVES, PARKING AREAS, LOADING AREAS AND SIGN LOCATIONS ON THE PROPERTY ❑ LANDSCAPED AREAS WITH DIMENSIONS ❑ ALL EASEMENTS IMPACTING THE PROPERTY SIGN PLAN N S 1 Ct v'r 611-72.C1 CAitC OPERATING ON CITY PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY) OPERATION /N A RESIDENTIAL ZONE) FILL OUT ATTACHED INFORMED CONSENT AND RELEASE OF LIABILITY FORM XHEALTH INSPECTION REPORT (IF APPLICABLE) IF APPLICANT PROPOSES TO HANDLE OR OFFER FOODSTUFFS FOR SALE, ATTACH AN INSPECTION REPORT FROM THE SOUTHEASTERN UTAH HEALTH DISTRICT SANITARIAN, DATED NOT MORE THAN TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF APPLICATION. ALL APPLICANTS AND STRUCTURES MUST COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE OF UTAH HEALTH REGULATIONS. ❑ ZONING COMPLIANCE EVIDENCE COMPLETE ATTACHED COMPLIANCE FORM ATTACHED PROPERTY OWNERS AUTHORIZATION LETTER ATTACHED WRITTEN RESTROOM AGREEMENT Q REFUSE/RECYCLING PLAN (IF APPLICABLE) ❑ FIRE OR BUILDING INSPECTION (IF APPLICABLE) COMPLETE ATTACHED INSPECTION SHEET �'❑ SPECIAL EVENTAL I -IL_OR/ZATION (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH A STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION FROM THE SPECIAL EVENT SPONSOR IF APPLICANT INTENDS TO CONDUCT BUSINESS ON THE PREMISES OF A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT. ATTACH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDICATED BELOW: 11/27/2013 T:IBUSINESSLICENSESIBUSLICFORMSI&rsLic- Vendor revison.doar Page 59 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses LICENSE APPROVALS MOAB CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: Il APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED REASON(S): SPECIAL CONDITIONS: CITY PL NNING APPROVED DISAPPROVED REASON(S): CITY RECORDER ❑ APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED REASON(S): LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: SIGNATURE OF CITY RECORDER COMMITTEE REVIEW DATE: APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED REASON(S): Fee Calculation: Mobile Vendor Fee Structure Administrative Fee* one time fee Solid Waste Fee(Food vendors Limited Term (less than 30 days) $10 $610 per month or partial month Flat Fee (includes administrative fee) Long Term (1 month-12 months) *Waived for local vendors with permanent business address in Grand County per month (plus admin fee) Sox to i1A-MA = 3istoeP, too, . Quo. 11;27/2013 T:.BUSINESSLICENSES,BUSLICFORMSIBusLic- Vendor rerison.docs Page 60 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses CITY OF MOAB BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTIONS 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY REASON FOR INSPECTIONS: ❑ INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FORAN EXISTING BUSINESS ADDING ANEW SERVICES). INDICATE SERVICE(S): 4 OTHER, PLEASE EXPLAIN: V t.A. cola r A p p `; cccf; ark, BUSINESS NAME: TO\ S OCOO BUSINESS ADDRESS: i%?-1 s - MQ.‘v\ SN't BUSINESS PHONE: 435-: 240 L'`V945- OWNERS NAME: _EZVC r60 ac 1V1otiC. L , Av roard o %a cycs, OWNERS PHONE �� �� �' Tt MS' , TYPE OF BUSINESS (EXPLAIN IN DETAIL): i•-•ice\ C Ql� k-oca ccric THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CALL AND SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT FOR INSPECTIONS. BUILDING INSPECTOR FIRE INSPECTOR 1g EALTH INSPECTOR (435) 259-1344/1345 (435) 259-5557 (435)259-5602 125 EAST CENTER 45 SOUTH 100 EAST 575 KANE CREEK BLVD INSPECTION REQUIRED: INSPECTION REQUIRED: INS CTION REQUIRED: YES ❑ NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) ES ❑ NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) YES ❑ NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION 7-/11/ IF YES, DATE OF 1NSPECTION7 `lV7 IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION t -g'- (---- APPROVEAYDISAPPROVED REASON: APPROVED/WDISAPPROVED ❑ APPROVED N DISAPPROVED 0 REASON: REASON: 07/01/05 Page 61 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses CITY OF MOAB 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532-2534 (435) 259-5121 FAX (435) 259-4135 Property Owner Authorization Letter City of Moab Treasurer's Office 217 E. Center St. Moab, UT 84532 This letter is to certify that I, am the owner of the property located at Date• f"'124,2 i ~N/\, 7$.7307ft7-4 (property address and parcel tax ID #) I understand that edU(k 6a `SC..Z i`eman� Ohs,-NoOkyCO °J�a (name of business li se applicant) has applied for a business license for ®Qb (applicant business name) from the City of Moab and that their business will be located from the above described address. I hereby give my permission to allow this activity from my property and authorize use of my restroom facilities for employees of the above listed business. Signature (property owner name) 3 S, 0 '1 CDA/S--, Printed Name Printed Name /3 g' Z5'2 52--9) -- 74) nn • oc 4:PAILLtt, Telephone # Email Please list additional businesses authorized to use the above property and restroom facilities: /)4/10AA, C-0 tAt-C�� VtLentli-JTOUM LLC Page 62 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses " \`V c''STY 04,--"\,) ," 1 ,.z. U4Yr .2411 UV* MOAB carry oT ivToao 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Business License Zoning Compliance Application To b filled out by the applicant: Name of Applicant: 5a0Qatio 19-CahqJ��Z _, iseeYYAyat F-1,sres Nerur'a VecAc0.., Business Name: \ CLCioS MCCko\ Address: 8-a s " Maw v�% Noma, 0 i el 3 31 12. Co Phone: 4-35 - 2 526I i 100 t Email: C-Pn(j,v, . to akte,e crMp t 1 " o ne\ ��o bc�� t Property Owner: Vendor Type (see Moab Municipal Code Chapter 5.64.010 for definitions): Q' Street Vendor Q' Sidewalk Vendor Q' Private Property Vendor Q' Local Vendor ;Rood Vendor Type (see Moab Municipal Code Chapter 5.64.010 for definitions): Cart Q'Vehicle Q' Display Apparatus Detailed description of business activities: M (a 00n -606i CC.VC+. Total number of off-street parking spaces: Hours of operation. r 6�%��t" To be filled out by city: Zoning: C5 Allowed use per Moab Municipal Code section: Number of parking spaces required for permanent business: 5 MOAI3 COV4136`( C OLI IJIN - Number of parking spaces required for other businesses. 1V-OFICAt- S I O N - Y0 MtAl -CO W - 3 Zoning Administrator -1 - Date Page 63 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses 0 Post 0 Pagan Mountaineering s �Moab Tropical Sno Shave Ice 0 rert Gear 0 Images of Moab 0 Zax W 100 S 16142m4biH .s n Oh My Dog! 0 �� Eddie MoStiff's 0angkok douse Too Tacos Wioab �--2� --P Canyonlands Trading Post Moab Cowboy Country Off -Road Adventures Moab Cowboy Country Off -Read Adventures... E100S E100S Go gfe 0 0 4 Tables 1.6 Chairs 0 0 Emery Teicom Video -Cable TV Kok-opelli Lorign-igs Moab Flats Page 64 of 239 E 100 8 E OO S zuf _ Map data •D2017 Ge• Kyle Terms Send feedback 54 ft !- 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses 1 Page 65 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses Page 66 of 239 6-3 Special Evonts/Vendors/Beer Licenses 79 S Main St Moah, Utah Street View - Aug 2u13 T Vl tkue eati-e Va,rn 41,4 ��-w,4 LL c_ of ems- rtei— c e-pc/i'ea_ use (Arai Dire c-vtn fl,�.�l b5- cAit%l itiUttL v p rove3a .8-243YY) Signage (Sign Proposal, not final design) We will have the menu written on the front side, in the location where the current menu is. "TACOS MOAB" will be displayed under the window, in the location where the current name is displayed. Page 68 of 239 6-3 Special Events/Vendors/Beer Licenses Agenda Summary Sheet Council Meeting Date: July 25, 2017 #: 7-1 Title: Confirmation of Mike Duncan for appointment to the Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board for a Two Year Term Fiscal Impact: none Staff Presenter(s): Mayor Sakrison Department: Administration Background/Summary: Mike Duncan, a City resident, originally applied for the Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board when the initial call for candidates was publicized in the spring. However, his application was overlooked when the initial board was nominated for appointment. Options: Confirm, deny, or modify. Water Conservation Board Recommendation: At the regular meeting of the Water Conservation Board held on Wednesday, July 13, the Board voted unanimously to nominate Mike Duncan for the Mayor's and Council's confirmation to serve. Recommended Motion: I move to confirm the appointment of Mike Duncan to serve on the Moab Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board for a Two Year Term ending December 31, 2018 with eligibility to renew. Attachment(s): Mike Duncan's application to serve on the Water Conservation and Drought Management Advisory Board. Page 69 of 239 7-1 Consent Agenda From: Mike Duncan Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:38 AM To: 'mayordavenmoabcity.orq' Cc: Eve Tallman Subject: Duncan, application for water board Dear Mayor Dave, Please accept this application for the new Ivloab Water Conservation and Drought ManagernentAdvisory Board. (Hmmrn, ft WCDMAB. Perhaps one of our first actions will be to adopt a new name. How about Mh2oAB, for Moab h20 Advisory Board? ) I'm 69, a retired electronics, aerospace engineer. Before my wife and I moved here in 2002; 1 was president of a 52 home HOP, back in Boulder; CO, with responsibilities including maintenance and operation of park and median watering. I served eight years on the county Planning Commission. I tutor math students at USU. For a few years I wrote apps for phones; mostly bike trails and GIS/map related efforts. I recently joined the board of the Moab Irrigation Co., which distributes Mill Creek water to many users in the mountains; valley and town. With my engineering background I have offered and expect to participate in maintaining USGS; Grand County Water Conservancy District flow meters. Eve: Could you e-mail me a copy of the water conservation plan? Without having read it; I posit that certainly we should plan for an indefinitely sustainable resource and rely on our best science to so guide us as to supply and demand. Neither a hand -waving ''we've got plenty of water' nor a panicked "stop all development" is appropriate. I do expect continually rising demand as the area grows, a concern given that the state has already declared the area closed to new water rights. This could get contentious and require political will if and when policy changes are mandated. I'd be pleased to serve; hoping that it not take too much time given other pursuits. Thank you, Mike Duncan Page 70 of 239 7-1 Consent Agenda Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: July 25, 2017 #: 8-1 PI-17-104 Title: Consideration to Adopt Ordinance #2017-21 Amending MMC Sections 17.09.530 (Conditional use permits), 17.09.531(14), 17.27.020, and 17.36.020, as Referred to the City Council by the Planning Commission Date Submitted: July 25, 2017 Staff Presenter: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Attachment(s): Proposed Ordinance #2017-21; PL-17-89, Memo to the Planning Commission Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance #2017-21 to amend Sections 17.09.530, 17.09.531 (14), 17.27.020 and 17.36.020 to Remove Self -storage Warehouses from Conditional Uses and Changing the Status to a Use by Right with standards, in the I-1 and C-4 Zoning Districts Background/Summary: On June 13, 2017, City Council reviewed Ordinance #2017-21 that amends the status of self -storage warehouses from a conditional use to a use by right with specific standards in the C-4 and I-1. Councilmember Jones requested a review of the existing standards (and particularly the allowable height) and suggested some variations to the standards. The ordinance was referred back to the Planning Commission and the results of the review are reflected in the attached draft. The ordinance: o Requires that travel surfaces consist of a hard all-weather surface and possible materials include asphalt, concrete, bricks, pavers, cobblestones or possibly some other porous surface. However, gravel is not allowed. o Establishes standards for the level of landscaping in the buffer area between the use and adjacent uses. o Requires a solid wall, six feet in height between the use and adjacent properties and a solid wall 8 feet in height when adjacent to residential uses. o Sets a maximum height standard of 20 feet for enclosed structures and 24 feet for required covered storage. The difference in height is to allow for the slope of the roof structures. o Requires that a proposed project satisfy the requirements of MMC Section 17.67, Site Plan Review. Page 71 of 239 8-1 Old Business ORDINANCE #2017-21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS 17.36.020, I-1, INDUSTRIAL, ZONE; 17.27.020 C-4, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ZONE; AND 17.09.531(14), TO REMOVE THE USE OF SELF -STORAGE WAREHOUSE FROM CONDITIONAL USES AND PERMITTING THEM IN THE C-4 AND I-1 WITH STANDARDS The following findings describe the intent and purpose of this ordinance: a. The City has enacted Sections 17.09.530 and 17.09.531 of the Moab Municipal Code (MMC), which govern conditional uses. b. From time to time the City undertakes to revise its zoning ordinances to improve the efficiency of review processes and the quality of land development. c. The City has reviewed the conditional uses specified in MMC Section 17.09.531, and determined that self -storage warehouses do not need to be included as a conditional use, and the Council believes that this use can be a use by right in the I-1 and C-4 Zones if appropriate standards are applied to development of self -storage warehouse facilities. d. The standards assure that self -storage warehouse developments will promote transportation access, good landscaping design, and buffering with respect to adjacent uses. e. The City finds that this ordinance will serve the public health, safety, and welfare, and that adoption is in the best interests of the Moab community. f. This ordinance was reviewed in a public hearing by the Planning Commission on May 11, 2017, and with the adoption of Planning Resolution 24-2017, the Planning Commission voted 3-1 to recommend approval. Therefore, the City of Moab enacts as follows: The Moab City Council hereby repeals Section 17.09.531(14) in its entirety; (14) Self -storage Warehouse. A. All new self -storage warehouse facilities or expansions are subject to approval of a site plan as described in Section 17.09.660, site plan --required. B. All drives and parking area surfaces shall consist of a maintained all-weather dust free surface such as asphalt, concrete, bricks, pavers or cobblestones. The use of gravel may be exercised but a dust inhibitor shall be regularly applied to the surface and appropriately worked into the surface material. C. Drive lanes must be of a sufficient width to allow vehicles to pass when another is loading or unloading by a unit. D. Traffic impacts shall be mitigated and not lead to disruption of traffic flow on adjacent streets. E. Self -storage warehouses shall be screened/buffered from adjacent properties by the use of decorative/solid wooden privacy fencing or decorative block walls. High quality landscaping may be incorporated into the screening effort but maintenance of all vegetation is the responsibility of the owner(s) of the property. F. Glare, dust, odor, and noise must be contained within the property boundaries. Page 72 of 239 8-1 Old Business G. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Sections 17.09.360, (landscaping --required) and 17.09.370, (landscaping --specifications). Landscaping screening shall be provided and maintained along the perimeter of the property and consist of twenty feet in depth. Vegetation may include existing trees and shrubs but weeds must be managed and landscaping maintained once it is installed. H. All structures shall be maintained in accordance with the adopted version of the International Property Maintenance Code. I. The lot size shall be between a minimum of two acres and a maximum of five acres. J. The total area covered by buildings shall not exceed fifty percent of the site. K. The maximum height of the building or buildings permitted as of right is twenty feet or one story. Additional height may be allowed by resolution of the planning commission. L. No outside storage is permitted except for large vehicles and boats that are under a permanent cover. M. The storage of hazardous, toxic, or explosive substances, including, but not limited to, but excluding the storage of, hazardous waste, industrial solid waste, medical waste, municipal solid waste, septage, or used oil, is prohibited. N. No business activity other than the rental of storage units shall be conducted on the premises. O. One dwelling unit is permitted on the same lot for use as a caretaker dwelling. AND, the Moab City Council hereby amends MMC Chapters 17.27.020, 33 Use Regulations, for the C-4 Commercial Zone with the addition of number "33, Self -storage Warehouse" and MMC Chapter 17.36.020, Use Regulations, for the I-1 Industrial Zone with the addition of letter "K, Self -storage warehouses" as a permitted use with the following language: Self -storage Warehouse. Self -storage Warehouse. A. All new self -storage warehouse facilities or expansions are subject to approval of a site plan as described in Section 17.67, Site Plan Review. B. All drives and parking area surfaces shall consist of a maintained all-weather dust free surface such as asphalt, concrete, bricks, pavers, cobblestones or some other porous surface but gravel is not allowed. C. Drive lanes must be of a sufficient width to allow vehicles to pass when another is loading or unloading by a unit. D. Traffic impacts shall be evaluated and mitigated in accordance with 17.67.040 M and N. E. Self -storage warehouses shall be screened/buffered from adjacent properties by the use of decorative/solid wooden privacy fencing or decorative block walls. Fence/walls shall be constructed to a minimum of six (6) feet in height when adjacent to other commercial zones and no less than eight (8) feet when adjacent to residential zones. Landscaping shall also be incorporated into the screening effort at the following rate: Page 73 of 239 8-1 Old Business 1. Landscape designs shall be in harmony with the environmental context of the development site. Preservation of native, on -site vegetation shall be a primary objective of site planning for development. Specimen plants shall be given particular consideration for retention on site. 2. Wherever the undisturbed natural desert landscape cannot be preserved, landscape design and construction shall promote the use of transplanted, on -site desert plants, container plants, seeded desert plants and inorganic groundcovers. This standard shall be particularly emphasized on all landscaped areas abutting public rights -of -way. 3. Trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in size, or of comparable height if bare -rooted, at planting time. If 24-inch box trees or transplanted trees of two-inch caliper or larger for all of the required trees, a reduction of one required tree per 100 linear feet will be allowed; a. Trees shall be planted at appropriate intervals so that a continuous perimeter canopy will be provided at maturity and not be at a rate of less than four (4) canopy trees and six (6) understory trees per 100 feet of buffer length; b. Shrubs shall be at least one gallon in size or at least 30-inch tall pots at planting time; c. Trees and shrubs shall be planted so that at maturity they do not interfere with service lines, traffic sight lines and the property rights of adjacent property owners; d. Any tree placed in the sight visibility triangle must be of a box size large enough to be immediately pruned up to a 72-inch height for clear sight visibility. All other trees shall be placed so that severe pruning is not required to keep the sight visibility triangle clear; 4. Trees located within sight visibility triangles shall not exceed one foot in its greatest cross - sectional dimension at maturity and shall not be planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed at an angle; and a. Trees planted within 10 feet of public sidewalks or curbs shall be provided with suitable root diverters to minimize heaving of those improvements. 5. Groundcovers. a. When inorganic groundcovers are used it shall be in combination with live plants and not exceed two-thirds of the total area of applied ground covers. b. Turf use is prohibited. c. Unpaved areas in any plant bed, median or tree understory within a planter shall be planted with shrubs, accents or vines, or covered with appropriate organic and inorganic ground covers. d. All areas not required for buildings, access drives, parking spaces, trails, and accessory uses shall be landscaped. 6. Shrubs. a. Shrubs shall be either deciduous species planted at two and one half feet (2 ''/z') in height with a mature height of at least six feet (6') or a coniferous species planted at two and one half feet (2 %2') in spread. Shrubs must be at least five (5) gallons in size at the time of planting. b. Shrubs shall be planted at a rate of twenty four (24) shrubs for each one hundred feet (100') of buffer length, or a portion thereof. a. c. 139 d. Twelve (12) evergreens F. Maintenance and replacement of all vegetation is the responsibility of the owner(s) of the property. G. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the requirements above. Landscaped screening shall be provided and maintained along the perimeter of the property and consist of ten feet in depth. H. All structures shall be maintained in accordance with the adopted version of the International Property Maintenance Code. I. The lot size shall be between a minimum of two acres and a maximum of five acres. Page 74 of 239 8-1 Old Business J. The total area covered by buildings shall not exceed fifty percent of the site. K. The maximum height of the enclosed building or buildings permitted shall not exceed twenty feet. L. No outside storage is permitted except for large vehicles and boats that are under a permanent cover. The permanent cover shall not exceed twenty-four feet in height. M. The storage of hazardous, toxic, or explosive substances, including, but not limited to, but excluding the storage of, hazardous waste, industrial solid waste, medical waste, municipal solid waste, septage, or used oil, is prohibited. N. No business activity other than the rental of storage units shall be conducted on the premises. O. One dwelling unit is permitted on the same lot for use as a caretaker dwelling. In effect on the day of passage; PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on the _ day of , 2017. SIGNED: David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel Stenta, Recorder Page 75 of 239 8-1 Old Business Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: July 25, 2017 #: 8-2 PI-17-105 Title: Adoption of Ordinance #2017-23 to Amend Chapter 17.72 of the Moab Municipal Code and Authorize a Hearing Officer to Decide Land Use Code Appeals and Modifying Appeal Procedures as Tabled by Council on June 13, 2017 Date Submitted: July 25, 2017 Staff Presenter: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Attachment(s): Proposed Ordinance #2017-23 Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance #2017-23, as written, to amend MMC Section 17.72.100 and use a single hearing officer for the Appeals Authority. Background/Summary: The City Council tabled Ordinance #2017-23 on June 13, 2017, because the text referred to the amended language in an ordinance (#2017-18) that had not yet been adopted. Ordinance #2017-18 that amended the requirements for review of site plans was approved on July 11, 2017. Ordinance #2017-23 will create a single hearing officer and updates the table in MMC Section 17.72.100, Matrix ofAdvisory, Land Use Authority, and Appeal Bodies. Utah Code requires local governments that regulate zoning to appoint an "appeal authority" to hear appeals from zoning decisions (UCA 10-9a-701. Appeals authority required). Changes in state law in 2015 now allow an appeal authority to be a single individual person, who is appointed to review decisions as a "hearing officer". Appeal authorities are authorized to consider appeals of administrative land use decisions, and may grant variances to zoning regulations. Appeal authorities cannot amend land ordinances, ignore ordinances, or use "appeals" as a means of waiving required regulations. Page 76 of 239 8-2 Old Business ORDINANCE #2017-23 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.72 OF THE MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE A HEARING OFFICER TO DECIDE LAND USE CODE APPEALS AND MODIFYING VARIOUS APPEAL PROCEDURES The following describe the intent and purpose of the City of Moab in the adoption of this ordinance. a. The City currently authorizes an Appeal Authority comprised of five persons to hear and decide certain land use appeals under the Moab Municipal Code. Given the limited number of appeals and the difficulty in filling volunteer positions generally, the City has had difficulty establishing an Appeal Authority. b. U.C.A. § 10-9a-701 authorizes municipalities to establish appeal authorities to hear and decide matters interpreting land use ordinances. c. The City finds that it is in the public interest to designate a person with the requisite skill and knowledge of land use matters and the conduct of adjudicatory hearings to serve as a hearing officer. d. The City additionally finds that it will serve the public interest to provide a forum for the adjudication of municipal land use matters that does not require court action. e. Last, the City finds that it is appropriate to revisit the types of land use approvals which should be subject to an appeal authority process, and this ordinance updates those determinations to provide for efficient review. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council repeals Sections 17.72.100 through 170 and replaces same as follows: 17.72.100 Matrix of Advisory, Land Use Authority, and Appeal Bodies. A. The Appeal Authority is authorized to hear and decide the following appeals, which are designated by the term AA in the column labelled Appeal Body. As used in this matrix, PC means Planning Commission; CC means City Council; DC means District Court; BC means the Boundary Commission; and NA means Not Applicable. Application/Action Advisory Body Land Use Authority Appeal Body Required Public Hearing Zone Change Planning Commission (PC) City Council (CC) District Court (DC) Yes, PC Land Use Map Amendment or Text Amendment PC CC DC Yes, PC Page 77 of 239 8-2 Old Business General Plan Amendment CC CC DC Yes, PC Annexation PC CC Boundary Commission/DC Yes, CC Pre -Annexation Agreement NA CC DC No Conditional Use PC CC DC No Site Plan Tier I NA Staff AA No Site Plan Tier II Staff PC AA No Master Planned Development Prelim. MPD PC CC AA Yes, PC Master Planned Development Final MPD PC CC AA No Zoning Code Interpretation NA Zoning Administrator AA No Non -Conforming Use NA Zoning Administrator AA No Variances Zoning Administrator AA DC No Flood Plain Ordinance NA Zoning Administrator AA No Hillside Ordinance PC CC AA No Planned Unit Development PC CC AA Yes, PC Subdivision, Less than Five Lots Staff PC AA No Subdivision, Five Lots or More PC CC AA Yes, PC Home Occupation NA Zoning Administrator AA No Accessory Use or Structure NA Zoning Administrator AA No Secondary Dwelling Unit NA Zoning Administrator AA No Geologic Hazard Determination Same as for the Underlying Application Expert Panel Per MMC 17.72.230 No Page 78 of 239 8-2 Old Business B. In the event of any conflict between the designation of the applicable appeal authority in this Section 100 and the terms of any other provision of the Moab Municipal Code, the terms of this Section shall control. C. Where the Appeal Authority is not designated as the appellate body, review shall be obtained by filing an action in the District Court. 17.17.120 Hearing Officer to Serve as Appeal Authority. A. The Appeal Authority shall be comprised of a single Hearing Officer appointed by the Mayor with the advice and consent of the City Council. The person appointed to serve as the hearing officer shall be a person with: a) knowledge of the Moab Municipal Code and zoning matters, generally; and b) knowledge of adjudicatory hearing procedures and the due process rights of land use applicants and other hearing participants. B. The Hearing Officer shall be paid for services performed pursuant to a contract and at such rates as shall be approved by the City Council. The Hearing Officer shall serve for a term of four (4) years from the date of appointment. 17.72.130 Jurisdiction. A. As a condition precedent to obtaining judicial review, each adversely affected party shall challenge the decision of the applicable Land Use Authority by filing an appeal under this Chapter. The Appeal Authority shall have jurisdiction to hear and decide only the following: 1. Appeals of decisions interpreting Chapter 17 (zoning), and Chapter 16 (subdivisions), and Chapter 15.40 (flood plain matters) of the Moab Municipal Code (MMC) as shown in the appeal matrix in § 17.72.100. B. In any appeal where a party claims that the land use authority reached a decision in violation of state or federal laws, as opposed to provisions of the Moab Municipal Code, the Appeal Authority shall not have jurisdiction to decide the matter, and review shall be obtained before the District Court. 17.72.140 Notice of Appeal and Appeal Fee. A. Any person adversely affected by a decision which is within the jurisdiction of the Appeal Authority may appeal under this Chapter. An appeal shall be commenced by filing a written Notice of Appeal and paying the applicable fee, as set by the Council from time to time. The City must receive the Notice of Appeal and appeal fee no later than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the decision by the City which is the subject of the appeal. B. An untimely appeal shall be dismissed with prejudice. 17.72.150 Conduct of Hearings. A. All hearing shall be conducted in a quasi-judicial manner and be recorded. The Hearing Officer shall conduct and control the hearing, administer oaths, and receive all evidence. Any interested party may offer evidence in the form of live testimony or by providing documentary or other forms of evidence. The Utah Rules of Evidence shall not apply; however the Hearing Officer has discretion to exclude from consideration any evidence which is deemed to be immaterial, irrelevant, or unreliable. Page 79 of 239 8-2 Old Business Additionally, the Hearing Officer has discretion to weigh the credibility and demeanor of witnesses who provide testimony where the appeal centers on disputed issues of fact. B. Hearings shall be scheduled with reasonable promptness, depending on the scope of the issues subject to review. The Hearing Officer may enter pre -hearing orders with respect to discovery, disclosure of witnesses and exhibits, or the like. C. Any interested party may appear individually or be represented by an attorney. D. The appealing party has the burden of proof to show that the decision or order of the City was unlawful, arbitrary, or capricious. E. All hearings shall be open to the public and notice of same shall be provided as otherwise provided for other public meeting of City bodies. F. The decision of the Appeal Authority shall be in writing, and shall contain findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Appeal Authority may affirm the decision, in whole or in part; reverse the decision, in whole or in part; or modify the decision as is warranted by the law and the evidence. 17.72.160 Stay of Decision. A. The filing of an appeal under this Chapter does not stay the decision that is the subjectof the appeal. To obtain a stay the appealing party must separately file a written request for stay with the Appeal Authority, which must show that the appealing party will suffer irreparable harm if the stay is not granted. The request for stay should be accompanied by the evidence, documents, or other information the appellant relies upon in support of its request for stay. 17.72.170 Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies; District Court Review. A. If a matter is within the jurisdiction of the Appeal Authority, the interested party must exhaust all of its administrative remedies by seeking review and a decision by the Appeal Authority prior to seeking review by the District Court. Every theory of relief predicated upon the interpretation of the Moab Municipal Code must first have been presented to the Appeal Authority to be preserved for review by the District Court. B. A party wishing to appeal the final decision of the Appeal Authority must commence an action in the District Court no later than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the final written decision by the Appeal Authority. A judicial action which is not commenced within that time shall be dismissed with prejudice. C. Review by the District Court shall be based solely on the record before the Appeal Authority. The Appeal Authority shall promptly transmit the record of its proceedings, including the transcript of the recorded hearing, all exhibits and other evidence, and all orders entered in the proceeding. The cost of preparing the transcript shall be paid by the appellant prior to transmittal of the record to the District Court. D. In any district court proceeding under this Chapter the appealing party has the burden of proof to show that the decision of the Appeal Authority was arbitrary, capricious, or illegal. Page 80 of 239 8-2 Old Business PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City of Moab City Council. This ordinance shall take effect no later than twenty (20) days from the date of publication. SIGNED: David L. Sakrison, Mayor Date ATTEST: Rachel Stenta, Recorder Page 81 of 239 8-2 Old Business Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: July 25, 2017 #: 8-3 Title: Proposed sewer rate changes based on a "cost -of -service" approach Date Submitted: July 18, 2017 Staff Presenter: David Everitt Attachment(s): - Proposed Resolution - Rate Change Analysis Memo by Bowen Collins Associates Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve the City of Moab Resolution Number 2017-_ Establishing Wastewater Service Rates". Background/Summary: Update: The City Council held a public hearing on June 27, 2017, regarding the proposed changes to sewer rates based on a "cost of service" approach. There were no comments from the public about the proposed changes. From previous agenda summaries: Earlier this year, the City updated its sewer rates using a relatively simple revenue needs approach. Recently, Bowen - Collins and Associates developed a more sophisticated approach based on a detailed cost of service analysis. This analysis will calculate detailed rates for FYE 2018 to FYE 2022. Implementing the recommendations will help Moab City keep its sewer system adequately funded to maintain its current infrastructure and continue to provide dependable service to its customers based upon a sewer rate structure that is more equitable than the revenue needs approach previously adopted. Details about the recommendation are contained in the attached memo. Page 82 of 239 8-3 Old Business CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO.48-2017 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER SERVICE RATES The following describes the intent and purpose of this resolution: a. The City of Moab has undertaken to construct a new wastewater treatment facility and has secured $15 million in financing for the construction of same. b. The City completed a Sewer Rate Cost of Service Analysis in May, 2017, which evaluated rate structures based on considerations of: projected system growth; total revenue requirements for operations, maintenance, and debt service; and equitable allocation of costs based on use of capacity and concentrations of wastewater discharge associated with different user groups. The methodology and conclusions of the Sewer Rate Cost of Service Analysis are adopted by the City and incorporated by reference. c. The City anticipates higher operations and maintenance costs as demands on the system increase and infrastructure ages. d. The City anticipates higher debt service obligations due to the financing of the new wastewater treatment facility. e. The City finds that it is necessary and appropriate that wastewater users pay for their proportionate share of all of the ongoing operations and maintenance needs and capital costs of the system. f. The City finds that a multi -year rate structure is necessary and appropriate to phase -in rate increases over time. g. The City has sewer rate setting authority pursuant to U.C.A. § 10-8-38, and other authorities. h. The City finds that the following rate structure is reasonable and consistent with the objectives and policies described above. Therefore, the City hereby enacts the following wastewater treatment rates: 1 Page 83 of 239 8-3 Old Business Monthly Wastewater Treatment Rates Monthly Base Rate Existing FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Single Family $14.40 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 Multifamily 1st Unit (2 Bedrooms or Larger) $19.10 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 + Charge per each additional unit - $2.80 $7.35 $9.80 $11.40 $11.40 Multifamily 1st Unit (1 Bedroom or Smaller) $19.10 $14.60 $15.80 $17.00 $16.55 $16.55 + Charge per each additional unit - $1.60 $4.10 $5.50 $6.40 $6.40 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit Condo, 2 Bedrooms or Larger $19.10 $16.40 $20.45 $23.25 $23.85 $23.85 + Charge per each additional unit - $3.40 $8.80 $11.75 $13.65 $13.65 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit Condo, 1 Bedroom or Smaller $19.10 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 + Charge per each additional unit - $2.80 $7.35 $9.80 $11.40 $11.40 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit Hotel/Motel (No Kitchen) $19.10 $15.25 $17.40 $19.15 $19.10 $19.10 + Charge per each additional unit - $2.20 $5.75 $7.65 $8.90 $8.90 Restaurant/Fast Food and Other Non -Residential: 1-inch or smaller water meter $19.10 $19.10 $19.10 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 1.5-inch water meter - $19.10 $21.75 $24.40 $24.80 $24.80 2-inch water meter - $24.25 $29.30 $32.95 $33.75 $33.75 3-inch water meter - $69.60 $84.75 $95.90 $99.65 $99.65 4-inch water meter - $86.40 $105.25 $119.25 $124.10 $124.10 5-inch water meter - $125.60 $153.20 $173.65 $181.05 $181.05 6-inch water meter - $170.45 $207.95 $235.80 $246.10 $246.10 8-inch water meter - $232.25 $283.55 $321.65 $335.95 $335.95 Volume Rate ($/thousand gal.) Existing FYE FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 2017 Residential $1.70 $1.70 $1.70 $1.82 $1.90 $1.90 Multifamily $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Overnight Accommodations $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Restaurant/Fast Food $1.85 $2.22 $2.66 $3.20 $3.41 $3.41 Other Non -Residential $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Volumetric charges for residential customers, including single family residences and multi -family residences, will be calculated based on the customer's average culinary water usage in November through January each year. The charge will be calculated by multiplying the average usage amount in gallons by the volumetric charge and adding same to the monthly base rate. That rate will be assessed each month and recalculated each successive year. New 2 Page 84 of 239 8-3 Old Business residential customers (single family and multi -family), will be assessed the base rate until a winter usage amount can be calculated. Volumetric charges for all other customers, including overnight accommodations, restaurants, and other non-residential (commercial) customers will be calculated based on the customer's total culinary water usage measured in the month preceding every billing month. The charge will be calculated by multiplying the preceding month's water usage amount in gallons by the volumetric charge and adding same to the monthly base rate. Passed and adopted by a majority vote of the City Council. This Resolution will take effect on August 1, 2017. Mayor David Sakrison Date Attest: Rachel Stenta, Recorder Date -End of Document- 3 Page 85 of 239 8-3 Old Business Prepared by: Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. "CONSULTING ENGINEERS Prepared for: OA B UTAH age 86 of 239 8-3 Old Business SEWER RATE COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS May 2017 Prepared for: Prepared by: CITY OF MOk&p, Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. liso CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 87 of 239 8-3 Old Business TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 Introduction ES-1 Cost of Service Sewer Rate Analysis ES-1 Recommendations ES-2 SEWER RATE COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 1-1 Introduction 1-1 Background 1-1 10-Year Budget Plan 1-2 Detailed Rate Calculation 1-2 Key Assumptions 1-3 Projecting Wastewater Production 1-3 Historic Indoor Water Use 1-3 Projected Growth 1-4 Projected Sewer Flows 1-5 Infiltration and Inflow 1-5 Strength Characteristics 1-5 Calculating Revenue Requirements 1-6 Impact Fee Revenue 1-6 Non -Rate Revenue 1-7 Moab City Expenditures 1-8 Cost Allocations 1-8 Customer Service Characteristics 1-9 Calculated Cost -of -Service Rates 1-9 Recommended Future Rates 1-11 Recommendations 1-14 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A — DETAILED RATE TABLES Page 88 of 239 8-3 Old Business TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) LIST OF TABLES No. Title Page No. ES-1 Calculated/Recommended Rates ES-3 1 Recommended Annual Revenue Increases for the 10-Year Budget Plan 1-1 2 Adopted Rates to Meet Projected Revenue Needs 1-2 3 2015 Account and Sewer Use Summary 1-4 4 Projected system Growth (ERUs) 1-4 5 Projected Growth in Sewer Flows 1-5 6 Projected Impact Fee Revenue 1-7 7 Projected Non -Rate Revenue 1-7 8 Projected Revenue Requirements 1-8 9 Calculated Cost -of -Service Rates 1-10 10 AWWA Equivalent Water Meter Ratios 1-12 11 Calculated/Recommended Monthly Rates 1-13 Page 89 of 239 8-3 Old Business EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Earlier this year, Moab City updated its sewer rates based upon a sewer rate report issued by Bowen, Collins & Associates, Inc. in February 2017. Due to various constraints, primarily related to the anticipated construction timing of the new WWTP, that report was limited in its analysis to a relatively simple revenue needs approach. The purpose of this report is to present recommended updates to Moab City's (City) sewer rates based a more detailed cost of service analysis. This analysis will calculate detailed rates for FYE 2018 to FYE 2022. Implementing the recommendations contained in this report will help Moab City keep its sewer system adequately funded to maintain its current infrastructure and continue to provide dependable service to its customers based upon a sewer rate structure that is more equitable than the revenue needs approach previously adopted. COST -OF -SERVICE SEWER RATE ANALYSIS The primary objective of this sewer rate analysis is to establish fair and equitable rates that will be sufficient to meet revenue requirements for the City. To accomplish this goal, this analysis focused on six major tasks: 1. Projecting Growth: In FYE 2016, the Moab City sewer system was composed of approximately 2,489 individual accounts compromising 5,468 residential equivalent residential units (ERUs). Based on Moab City water reclamation facility planning information, the estimated total population growth rate for the next six years was estimated to be approximately 1.1 % for all customers. 2. Calculating Revenue Requirements: Total revenue requirements for the City were projected for the next several years. Those requirements included operations and maintenance costs, capital improvement costs, facilities rehabilitation/replacement costs, and debt service. Revenue generated outside of sewer rates (impact fees, sewer sales to SVW&SID, septage sales, finance charges, etc.) was deducted from the total to give the net revenue requirement to be recovered from service charges. 3. Comparing Revenue to Required Revenue: Once revenue requirements were projected, it was possible to compare required revenue to revenue projections. 4. Developing a Funding Plan to Meet Projected Needs: In order for the City to meet projected expenditures and maintain its reserve fund at acceptable levels, it is important that revenue be sufficient to accommodate future projects. This study utilized the plan from the February 2017 sewer rate study to maintain the City's reserve fund and establish funding levels appropriate to provide the desired level of service in the wastewater system. 5. Allocating Costs to Customers: This analysis generally followed the design cost - causative procedure recommended by the Water Environment Federation (WEF), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and American Public Works Association (APWA). The essential principle of this method is that sewer rates should be recovered from customers in proportion to the cost of serving customers. Page 90 of 239 8-3 Old Business As part of this analysis, some significant changes in the City's billing structure have been recommended to better reflect the actual cost of serving different types of customers. These changes include: • Multi -unit and Large Meter Based Rates - Instead of charging the same base rate to all accounts regardless of size, it is proposed that base rates be proportional to potential use of capacity in the system. To implement this principle, it is proposed that multi -unit accounts (including overnight accommodations) be based on the size and number of units per account and that larger commercial accounts be charged based on their water meter size. • Strength Based Volume Rates for Restaurants and Fast Food — It is also proposed that restaurants and fast food eateries be charged higher volume charges based on their higher strength wastewater. 6. Calculating Final Sewer Rates: Using the recommended billing structure, sewer rates were calculated to recover the allocated cost -of -service based on operation and maintenance costs, debt service, and capital improvement costs. The recommended sewer rates shown in Table ES-1 reflect a multiple year rate schedule (using the recommended billing structure) needed to meet the cost of capital improvements and system renewal. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the service charges summarized in Table ES-1 be adopted by Moab City. The proposed rates should be re-evaluated in approximately five years to ensure that the City's revenue requirements and goals for customer equity are being met. Page 91 of 239 8-3 Old Business Table ES-1 Calculated/Recommended Rates Monthly Base Rate Existing FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Single Family $14.40 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 Multifamily 1st Unit (2 Bedrooms or Larger) $19.10 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 + Charge per each additional unit - $2.80 $7.35 $9.80 $11.40 $11.40 Multifamily 1st Unit (1 Bedroom or Smaller) $19.10 $14.60 $15.80 $17.00 $16.55 $16.55 + Charge per each additional unit - $1.60 $4.10 $5.50 $6.40 $6.40 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit Condo, 2 Bedrooms or Larger $19.10 $16.40 $20.45 $23.25 $23.85 $23.85 + Charge per each additional unit - $3.40 $8.80 $11.75 $13.65 $13.65 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit Condo, 1 Bedroom or Smaller $19.10 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 + Charge per each additional unit - $2.80 $7.35 $9.80 $11.40 $11.40 Overnight Accommodations: 1st $19.10 $15.25 $17.40 $19.15 $19.10 $19.10 Unit Hotel/Motel (No Kitchen) + Charge per each additional unit - $2.20 $5.75 $7.65 $8.90 $8.90 Restaurant/Fast Food and Other Non -Residential: 1-inch or smaller water meter $19.10 $19.10 $19.10 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 1.5-inch water meter - $19.10 $21.75 $24.40 $24.80 $24.80 2-inch water meter - $24.25 $29.30 $32.95 $33.75 $33.75 3-inch water meter - $69.60 $84.75 $95.90 $99.65 $99.65 4-inch water meter - $86.40 $105.25 $119.25 $124.10 $124.10 5-inch water meter - $125.60 $153.20 $173.65 $181.05 $181.05 6-inch water meter - $170.45 $207.95 $235.80 $246.10 $246.10 8-inch water meter - $232.25 $283.55 $321.65 $335.95 $335.95 Volume Rate ($/kgal) Existing FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Residential $1.70 $1.70 $1.70 $1.82 $1.90 $1.90 Multifamily $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Overnight Accommodations $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Restaurant/Fast Food $1.85 $2.22 $2.66 $3.20 $3.41 $3.41 Other Non -Residential $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Page 92 of 239 8-3 Old Business SEWER RATE COST OF SERVICE ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION The purpose of this rate study is to present recommended updates to Moab City's (City) sewer rates based a cost of service analysis. This analysis will calculate detailed rates for FYE 2018 to FYE 2022 and present a longer term finance plan to achieve the City's primary objectives of: • Maintain high quality and reliable sewer service at affordable prices for customers; • Sustain stable revenue generation adequate to fund system needs; • Minimize the City's long-term costs by avoiding further debt where possible; and • Equitably charge each customer based on their actual cost of service. Implementing the recommendations contained in this report will help Moab City keep its sewer system adequately funded to maintain its current infrastructure and continue to provide dependable service to its customers based upon a more equitable sewer rate structure. BACKGROUND Earlier this year, Moab City updated its sewer rates based upon two sewer rate reports issued by Bowen, Collins & Associates, Inc. (BC&A). The original report, completed in October of 2016, was updated in February 2017 to account for higher than expected construction costs associated with the proposed wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) to be constructed in the near future. Due to various constraints, primarily related to the anticipated construction timing of the new WWTP, those reports calculated rates based upon a relatively simple revenue needs approach. Those reports recommended that the City revisit their rate structure based on cost -of -service principles as soon as reasonably possible. The rate study completed in February 2017 for Moab City is included in Appendix B. Table 1 shows the recommended annual revenue increases needed to meet the requirements of the City's sewer system as described in that previous rate study. Table 1 Recommended Annual Revenue Increases for the 10-Year Budget Plan Year Rate Revenue Increase FYE 2018 20% FYE 2019 20% FYE 2020 12% FYE 2021 4.5% FYE 2022 0%* FYE 2023 0%* FYE 2024 0%* FYE 2025 0%* FYE 2026 0%* * No significant increase expected, but small annual adjustments may be needed to account for inflation or other issues. Page 93 of 239 8-3 Old Business Table 2 shows the previously calculated rate structure recently adopted by the City. As the February 2017 report was limited to a revenue needs analysis, the rates adopted by the City were calculated by simply multiplying the City's existing rate structure by the percent increases identified in Table 1. Table 2 Adopted Rates to Meet Projected Revenue Needs Monthly Base Rate Existing FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Residential $14.40 $17.28 $20.74 $23.22 $24.27 $24.27 Commercial $19.10 $22.92 $27.50 $30.80 $32.19 $32.19 Volume Rate ExistingFYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Residential $1.70 $2.04 $2.45 $2.74 $2.87 $2.87 Commercial $1.85 $2.22 $2.66 $2.98 $3.12 $3.12 Average Monthly Residential Bill $21.88 $26.26 $31.51 $35.29 $36.88 $36.88 The following sections of this report examine more closely the actual cost of service for different types of customers and recommended rates to improve rate equity between users of Moab City's sanitary sewer system. 10-YEAR BUDGET PLAN A 10-year budget plan is a critical component of the analysis to determine a cost of service rate structure. The budget plan outline in the February 2017 sewer rate study was used to determine the revenue requirements shown in Table 1. For additional detail on overall budgeting, the reader should reference the February 2017 report. The following cost of service analysis is based on that original budget plan. DETAILED RATE CALCULATION With an overall revenue plan in place, the next step in the rate calculation process is a detailed cost -of -service rate analysis. This analysis focuses on four major tasks: 1. Projecting Sewer Use: Future sewer sales were estimated by examining current use patterns and by projecting sewer system growth for the next several years. 2. Calculating Revenue Requirements: Total revenue requirements of the system were projected for the next several years based on the budget plan outlined in the February 2017 report. Non -rate revenue (including impact fee, septage sales, etc.) was deducted from the total to give the net revenue requirement to be recovered from rate payers. 3. Cost Allocation: This analysis generally follows the design cost -causative procedure recommended by the Water Environment Federation (WEF), American Society of Civil Page 94 of 239 8-3 Old Business Engineers (ASCE), and American Public Works Association (APWA)1. The essential principle of this method is that wastewater revenue should be recovered from classes of customers in proportion to the cost of serving those customers. All sewer connections have been grouped into five customer classes resulting in a standard rate for each class. 4. Wastewater Rate Design: Wastewater rates were calculated to recover the allocated cost -of -service based on operation and maintenance costs, capital improvement costs, and debt service costs. The remainder of this report details the results of each of these four major tasks. Detailed rate tables from the model used to develop the rate recommendations are located in Appendix A. KEY ASSUMPTIONS The results presented in this report are based on the following assumptions: 1. The Moab City sewer operating fund will continue to be a self -funding enterprise fund. 2. The study follows the basic recommended methodologies of the joint publication, "Financing and Charges for Wastewater Systems". Only the "cash basis" approach has been used to allocate costs to users. 3. This wastewater rate study is based on projections of future wastewater production and projected system operation, maintenance, and improvement costs. These projections are based on current economic conditions and wastewater use patterns. Because conditions may change over time, it is recommended that the City review the wastewater rates periodically and adjust them as needed to provide a revenue stream that will adequately fund operation and maintenance costs as well as needed rehabilitation and replacement projects. It is also recommended that a comprehensive review and updating of wastewater rates be undertaken in three to five years so that the basic analytical foundations of this study can be re-evaluated. PROJECTING WASTEWATER PRODUCTION Historic Indoor Water Use In FYE 2016, the City provided sewer service to approximately 2,489 accounts composed of approximately 5,468 flow ERUs. The City has historically separated accounts into two classes as described below: • Single Family Residential — This class represents all the single family residential customers connected into the Moab City sewer system. Based on information provided to BC&A, this customer class currently accounts for approximately 32% of all ERUs in the system. Each residential unit is assumed to be 1 ERU by the City. The strength of wastewater flows is not differentiated within this class. • Commercial — This class of customers contains all other customers. The strength of wastewater flows is not differentiated within this class. The City historically tracks commercial subclasses in four categories as follows: multifamily, overnight accommodations, restaurant/fast food, and other non-residential. 'Water Environment Federation, American Society of Civil Engineers, and American Public Works Association. Financing and Charges for Wastewater Systems, 1984. Page 95 of 239 8-3 Old Business For the purposes of this study, BC&A would propose using the same five general customer classifications the City has developed. Moab City does not meter sewage flows for individual customers. Lacking direct information on flow rates, BC&A estimated the typical sewer flow rates based on indoor water meter data obtained from Moab City for FYE 2015. The number of accounts in each customer class, along with their estimated sewer flows in FYE 2015, is summarized in Table 3. Table 3 2015 Account and Sewer Use Summary Customer Class Number of Accounts in 2015 Number of ERUs in 2015 2015 Sewer Flows (kgal) Average Monthly Flows/ERU (kgal) Residential 1,753 1,753 91,073 4.3 Multifamily 409 227 12,070 4.4 Overnight Accommodations 60 1,958 81,618 3.5 Restaurant/Fast Food 43 392 18,877 4.0 Other Non- Residential 197 1,078 48,297 3.7 Total 2,462 5,409 251,935 - Projected Growth There is a relatively large amount of area within Moab City that is undeveloped. Therefore, a reasonable amount of growth is expected. The basis of the growth projected to occur was taken from Moab City's recent water reclamation facility planning efforts. The growth rate was applied to the number of existing ERUs and accounts. Overall historic growth has generally been relatively moderate. The projected growth rates and number of ERUs by customer type are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 Projected System Growth (ERUs) Customer Class FYE 2016 FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Residential 1,772 1,791 1,811 1,831 1,851 1,872 1,892 Multifamily 230 233 235 238 240 243 246 Overnight Accommodations 1,980 2,002 2,024 2,046 2,069 2,091 2,114 Restaurant/Fast Food 396 400 405 409 414 418 423 Other Non -Residential 1,090 1,102 1,114 1,126 1,139 1,151 1,164 Total 5,468 5,528 5,589 5,650 5,713 5,775 5,839 % System Growth 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% Page 96 of 239 8-3 Old Business Projected Sewer Flows Future sewer demands were projected by multiplying the average use per ERU in FYE 2015 from Table 3 by the projected number of ERUs in Table 4. Using this methodology, the projected growth in total sewer flows are shown in Table 5. Table 5 Projected Growth in Sewer Flows Customer Class Use per ERU/Year Flow Amount (kgal) FYE 2016 FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Residential 52.0 92,075 93,062 94,101 95,140 96,180 97,271 98,310 Multifamily 53.1 12,203 12,362 12,468 12,627 12,733 12,892 13,052 Overnight Accommodations 41.7 82,516 83,433 84,349 85,266 86,225 87,142 88,100 Restaurant/Fast Food 48.2 19,085 19,277 19,518 19,711 19,952 20,145 20,386 Other Non- Residential 44.8 48,828 49,366 49,903 50,441 51,023 51,561 52,143 Total - 254,706 257,500 260,341 263,186 266,113 269,011 271,991 Infiltration and Inflow Infiltration and inflow is the intrusion of groundwater or storm water into the sewer system through cracked pipes, broken and offset joints, improper connections, leaky manholes, etc. In areas with aging sewer lines and high groundwater, infiltration can actually be the largest component of flow being conveyed in the sewer. Infiltration is very difficult to measure because it varies across the service area based on climate conditions, water table levels, pipe diameter, and pipe condition. Because of the difficulty of identifying the source and quantity of infiltration, Moab City does not bill sewer accounts for infiltration directly. Thus, infiltration and inflow are not included in the rate model. Strength Characteristics Strength characteristics of wastewater are generally used to scale the cost of treatment between different users. For example, an industrial connection may produce stronger wastewater than a residential connection, thus meriting a higher sewer rate to cover the increased treatment cost. The only historical data regarding wastewater strength available to BC&A were measurements taken at the wastewater treatment plant. 300 mg/L of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and 280 mg/L of total suspended solids (TSS) were recorded for the combined wastewater stream entering the WWTP. Those values were assumed to be the approximate average strength of all connections. Flow strength per connection has not been monitored in detail by the City. However, based on previous residential equivalence studies conducted by BC&A of similar entities, restaurant and fast food customers have higher wastewater strength characteristics. Correspondingly, the projected strength of wastewater from these customers has been updated in the rate model. The strength portion of the rate model may provide further value to the City if it has any individual customers in the future that merit additional consideration of strength. Table Page 97 of 239 8-3 Old Business A7 of Appendix A shows the BOD and TSS values that were used in the rate model for each customer class. CALCULATING REVENUE REQUIREMENTS There are two methods for determining a water utility's revenue requirements. One is called the Cash Basis of revenue requirements. The other method is called the Utility Basis of revenue requirements. The revenue requirements for each approach are summarized on the next page. Cash Basis Utility Basis Operation and Maintenance Costs Plus: Debt Service Cash -Financed Capital Outlays Taxes (if applicable) Net Additions to Reserves Total Requirements Less: Non -Rate Revenues Equals:Net Requirements from Rates Operation and Maintenance Cost Plus: Depreciation Return on Investment Taxes (if applicable) Total Requirements Less: Non -Rate Revenues Equals:Net Requirements from Rates The cash basis of revenue requirements is based on the actual cash expenditures of the system. Its goal is to make sure revenues match the cash needs of the system. In public utilities, this method generally matches the budgetary expenditures for the period. It has the additional advantage of being more understandable to most ratepayers and more directly meets any debt service coverage requirements that the system might need to comply with. The utility basis approach simulates the financial requirements of private sector companies. It ensures that revenue requirements reflect the depreciation incurred by the system, as well as a return on the investment in rate base by system owners. In the municipal utility setting, the utility basis is most often used when there is significant utility service to customers outside the jurisdictional boundaries of the system owners. It allows the system owners (i.e., City customers) to earn a return from the investments to serve the customers outside the City. Approximately one third of flows treated by Moab City originate outside the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For these flows, the utility basis could be well suited to calculate revenue requirements. However, because this rate study does not seek to determine retail rates for users outside the City, the utility basis is less applicable. For customers inside Moab City, the cash basis is the preferred method for these circumstances. Due to its previously stated advantages, rates in this study were developed under the cash basis only. Impact Fee Revenue The projected annual revenue from impact fees is based on the projected number of new ERUs. The impact fee revenue also includes the revenue obtained from new development outside of Moab City that is routing flow into Moab for treatment (such as SVW&SID). For this analysis, it has been assumed that the City's impact fee rates will be as discussed in the 2016 Moab Sewer Impact Fee Analysis. If Moab City adopts impact fees other than those recommended, the rates calculated in this report will need to be adjusted accordingly. The projected impact fee revenue is Page 98 of 239 8-3 Old Business generally expected to increase gradually over the next six years following system growth and City projections, as shown in Table 6. The exception to the gradual trend are some larger increases between FYE 2018 and FYE 2020 that occur as new capacity at the treatment plant opens up opportunity for additional connections from San Juan County and elsewhere. Table 6 Projected Impact Fee Revenue Item FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Projected Collections Impact Fee Revenues $83,891 $85,067 $122,044 $144,637 $147,367 $148,681 Projected Treatment Impact Fee Revenues $104,678 $106,427 $205,960 $258,232 $263,620 $265,651 Projected Total Impact Fee Revenues $188,569 $191,494 $328,003 $402,869 $410,987 $414,332 Non -Rate Revenue The projected non -rate revenue for the City is summarized in Table 7. The projected revenue amounts are based on a 3% inflation rate and the ERU growth rates shown in Table 4. This non - rate revenue is the net income from activities not associated with Moab City sewer sales. It includes sewer rate collection penalty fees and interest, sales to SVW&SID, septage sales, impact fees, and other income. As shown in the table, impact fees, SVW&SID sewer sales, and septage sales account for the vast majority of the total non -rate revenue. There is a large increase shown in FYE 2018 in association with new rates calculated as part of the February 2017 Rate Study. Increases thereafter are relatively modest and correspond with inflation and system growth. Table 7 Projected Non -Rate Revenue Item FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 SVW&SID Sewer Sales $296,157 $442,821 $464,107 $512,925 $536,720 $561,422 Special Services $1,500 $1,562 $1,626 $1,692 $1,762 $1,834 Septage Sales $76,755 $241,341 $247,302 $252,057 $258,342 $264,836 Sewer Connections $8,000 $8,328 $8,669 $9,025 $9,395 $9,780 T Impact Fees $188,569 $191,494 $328,003 $402,869 $410,987 $414,332 Finance Charges & Other Income $22,400 $23,318 $24,274 $25,270 $26,306 $27,384 Total $593,381 $908,865 $1,073,982 $1,203,837 $1,243,511 $1,279,587 Page 99 of 239 8-3 Old Business Moab City Expenditures The projected City expenditures for the planning period are summarized in Table 8. Included in the table are the projected total costs for the three major categories of expenditures: operations and maintenance, debt service, and capital expenditures. These categories are discussed in more detail in following sections. Table 8 Projected Revenue Requirements Item FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 O&M $984,099 $1,134,035 $1,174,293 $1,215,980 $1,259,147 $1,303,847 Debt Service $0 $798,834 $798,834 $877,592 $877,592 $877,592 Capital Outlays $547,513 $114,069 $481,747 $673,591 $758,684 $768,400 Total Expenditures $1,531,612 $2,046,937 $2,454,874 $2,767,163 $2,895,423 $2,949,840 Operation and Maintenance Costs: The projected operation and maintenance costs for Moab City were based on the City's budgeted amount for FYE 2017 and are discussed in more detail in the February 2017 sewer rate study. A detailed list of O&M costs is included as part of the rate model in Appendix A. Debt Service Costs: These are the costs paid toward the loans taken out or expected to be taken out by the City in the near future and are discussed in more detail in the February 2017 sewer rate study. A detailed list of loan payments is included as part of the rate model in Appendix A. Capital Improvement Costs: These are the costs for constructing new facilities within Moab City. This can include completely new facilities or replacement of existing facilities. In years where capital expenditures for rehabilitation and replacement of the existing infrastructure do not occur, or are less than the amount budgeted, the rate revenue will be transferred to the City's savings fund which will be stored to pay for future improvements. If major improvement projects are needed before the fund has been sufficiently built up, the City will likely need to utilize a bond for a portion of that future project's cost. It should be noted that the FYE 2017 Moab City budget identified four recommended potential improvement projects outside of those already discussed previously. As the project costs range from only approximately $8,000 to $100,000, it was assumed that these projects could be funded through the funds annually set aside for rehabilitation and replacement as previously described. The capital improvement projects and the recommended timing of their construction is shown in Table All of Appendix A. The expenditures of this category are discussed in more detail in the February 2017 Sewer Rate Study. COST ALLOCATIONS A key step in a cost -causative wastewater rate analysis is the allocation of costs to customer service characteristics. The allocation approach used in this study reflects the basic approaches recommended by WPCF, ASCE, and APWA. Page 100 of 239 8-3 Old Business Customer Service Characteristics This approach recommends the allocation of costs into one of four cost allocation categories: • Volume Costs — Volume costs refer to costs that are determined by the volume of wastewater generated in the system. • Capacity Costs — Capacity costs are typically costs determined by the peak wastewater production of system users. Although peak flows are not billed for directly (in part because there is no presently installed way to monitor them), there is a component of the system that allows each customer the opportunity to intermittently discharge peak flows. As a result, each customer should be paying for their potential to discharge at peak rates into the system, even though this capacity may be rarely used. This category would include such items as the design and construction of major trunk lines since they are sized based on peak flow rates. • Strength Costs — Strength costs are those costs determined by BOD or TSS concentrations of the wastewater. • Customer Related Costs — Customer related costs are those costs that are independent of the quantity or quality of wastewater generated. This category is mostly limited to administrative services such as the cost of generating and sending out bills each month. Detailed cost divisions have been completed in the sewer rate model (see Tables Al2 through Al of Appendix A). In each case, these allocations are based on professional engineering judgment and knowledge of system operations. Table Al2 provides a division by cost allocation category for O&M expenditures. Table Al lists the cost allocations for City assets and the overall allocated percentage amounts to each division. Using those overall allocation percentages, allocations were determined for debt service, capital outlays, and all non -rate revenue in Table Al of Appendix A. Using the percentages assigned to each budget category, the system revenue costs are distributed among the customer service classes to produce a total revenue requirement for each customer service characteristic. Table Al of Appendix A shows that total cost allocation for each customer class and service characteristic. CALCULATED COST -OF -SERVICE RATES Following the recommended cost -of -service methodology, required rates to satisfy the City's projected revenue requirements were calculated as summarized in Table 9. Page 101 of 239 8-3 Old Business Table 9 Calculated Cost -of -Service Rates Monthly Account Base Rate FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 All Users $7.16 $8.65 $9.74 $10.19 $10.18 Monthly ERU Base Rate FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 All Users $7.84 $9.58 $10.88 $11.40 $11.38 Volume Rate ($/kgal) FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Volume Component All Users $0.79 $0.87 $0.90 $0.93 $0.94 Strength Component Restaurant/Fast Food Users $1.66 $2.06 $2.37 $2.48 $2.48 All Other Users $0.64 $0.80 $0.92 $0.97 $0.96 Total Volume Rate Restaurant/Fast Food Users $2.45 $2.93 $3.27 $3.41 $3.41 All Other Users $1.44 $1.67 $1.82 $1.90 $1.90 Like existing City rates, this calculation includes developing a monthly base rate for each user plus a set rate per 1,000 gallons of actual indoor water used each month. However, a number of modifications to the existing City rate structure are recommended. • Monthly Base Rate - Historically, monthly base rates have been the same for each account, regardless of the size of connection. Based on cost -of -service, it is recommended that the monthly base rate be separated into a monthly account base rate and a monthly ERU base rate. The base rate is divided into those two categories to more equitably capture the varying situations of capacity reservation within the sewer system. Each user would be charged a monthly account base rate to cover costs associated with simply being connected into the system (such as administrative costs for monthly billings). In addition, each user would also pay a monthly base rate dependent upon the user's number of ERUs to reserve capacity in the system as previously described in the cost allocation section. A main point of that section is that the capacity reservation is primarily due to the standard practice of sizing sewer trunk lines and other facilities based on the maximum expected peak flows for each user. Customers with higher peak flows require dedicating a larger portion of sewer system capacity to adequately serve them even if they do not frequently utilize the full capacity (and correspondingly cannot be captured through volume rates). Equity between customers is improved by correspondingly charging a higher base rate for the increased capacity dedication. Where this change will likely have the greatest effect in Moab is on overnight accommodations. Historically, Moab has only charged hotels a single base rate that is very similar to what a single residential unit pays. Thus, a residential connection pays $14.40 per month for the ability to connect to the sewer system and a hotel (or any other type of non-residential user) only pays a little bit more at $19.10 per month. This is true Page 102 of 239 8-3 Old Business regardless of the size of non-residential connection. While a resident and a hotel do have roughly the same amount of billing and administrative costs, the hotel's need for available capacity can be many more time that of a single home. Thus, paying essentially the same base rate does not effectively reflect the cost of service for each customer. It is sometimes argued that larger customers do pay more for service through increased volume charges. However, as noted about, the revenue that is collected though volume charges only reflects the costs associated with actual volume related expenditures. They do not reflect the costs of available capacity. To be most consistent with cost of service principles, capacity related costs should not be collected through volume charges, but through base charges associated with expected maximum capacity needs. • Wastewater Strength Component — As shown in Table Al of Appendix A, the strength category accounts for approximately 18% of sewer system annual revenue requirements. To improve equity of rates, wastewater strength should be factored into the rates. For the customers in the City's system, there is no existing practical way of measuring wastewater strength for individual customers on a regular basis. Apart from the "restaurant/fast food" and "other non-residential" customer classifications shown in Table 3, the remaining three customer classifications are expected to produce relatively similar BOD and TSS concentrations so the extra effort to capture the differences may not be warranted. The "restaurant/fast food" classification is expected to have a relatively higher BOD and TSS from the standard based on past sampling of similar entities. As the "other non-residential" classification covers a wide range of customer types, it is much more difficult to determine strength characteristics without further sampling. To be more equitable for the other customer classifications (which should have much lower wastewater strength), the rate model utilized higher BOD and TSS concentrations for the `restaurant/fast food' classification and lower concentrations (based off historical sampling of the total combined influent into the WWTP) for the remaining four classifications to calculate the cost -of -service for the strength component of the volume rate. The cost -of -service information contained in this report may be used as a basis to calculate equitable rates if Moab City ever has a request to provide service to an industrial or other high strength user or would like to conduct thorough wastewater strength sampling of additional customer classifications. RECOMMENDED FUTURE RATES The cost -of -service rates summarized above provide a good basis for developing recommended rates for the system. However, to fairly and efficiently administer the rates, it is useful to further define the rate structure by customer class. For monthly base rates, all customer classes will be calculated by adding the monthly account base rate (from Table 9) to the monthly ERU base rate (also from Table 9) multiplied by the flow ERUs associated with the account. For customer classifications where multiple units may exist under a single account, such as a motel, the first unit will be charged the account base rate but each additional unit will be charged a monthly base rate dependent only on the ERU base rate. This will ensure the City only charges these types of customers once per month to cover the monthly account base rate portion of the bill. For the calculation of flow ERUs per account, the following is recommended: Page 103 of 239 8-3 Old Business " Single Family  In the case of single family customers, the number of flow ERUs per account is simply one. " Multifamily  For multifamily customers, it is recommended that the flow ERUs associated with each account be based on the per unit values defined in Table 10 of the 2016 Moab Sewer Impact Fee Analysis (IFA). This customer class includes two subcategories: O 2 Bedrooms or Larger = 1.0 ERUs per unit O 1 Bedroom or Smaller = 0.56 ERUs per unit " Overnight Accommodations  For this category of customers, it is also recommended that the flow ERUs associated with each account be based on the per unit values defined in Table 10 of the 2016 Moab Sewer Impact Fee Analysis. This customer class includes three subcategories: o Condo (2 bedroom and larger) = 1.2 ERUs per unit o Condo (1 bedroom and smaller) = 1.0 ERUs per unit o Hotel/Motel = 0.78 ERUs per unit " Restaurant/Fast Foot and Other Non -Residential  For this category of customers, it is recommended that the flow ERUs associated with each account be based on the AWWA equivalent meter ratio (determined by the actual size of the water meter serving the customer). Table 10 shows the equivalent meter ratio per meter size. This equivalent meter ratio rate structure will allow the City to more fairly charge for the capacity reservation as the water meter size is typically directly related to flow capacity. This will result in a generally consistent monthly rate for each commercial customer. As shown in Table 11, entities with 1-inch and smaller meters (approximately equal in size to that of the typical single family residence) will be charged the same monthly rate as a single family residence. Table 10 AWWA Equivalent Water Meter Ratios Customer Class Meter Size (Inches) 1 and smaller 1 1/2 2 3 4 6 8 10 AWWA Equiv. Meter Ratios 1.0 1.3 2.1 7.9 10.0 15.0 20.7 28.6 Based on the methodology described above, the recommended wastewater rates necessary to meet projected revenue requirements for the next five years are summarized in Table 11. Page 104 of 239 8-3 Old Business Table 11 Calculated/Recommended Monthly Rates Monthly Base Rate Existing FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Single Family $14.40 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 Multifamily 1st Unit (2 Bedrooms or Larger) $19.10 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 + Charge per each additional unit - $2.80 $7.35 $9.80 $11.40 $11.40 Multifamily 1st Unit (1 Bedroom or Smaller) $19.10 $14.60 $15.80 $17.00 $16.55 $16.55 + Charge per each additional unit - $1.60 $4.10 $5.50 $6.40 $6.40 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit Condo, 2 Bedrooms or Larger $19.10 $16.40 $20.45 $23.25 $23.85 $23.85 + Charge per each additional unit - $3.40 $8.80 $11.75 $13.65 $13.65 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit Condo, 1 Bedroom or Smaller $19.10 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 + Charge per each additional unit - $2.80 $7.35 $9.80 $11.40 $11.40 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit Hotel/Motel (No Kitchen) $19.10 $15.25 $17.40 $19.15 $19.10 $19.10 + Charge per each additional unit - $2.20 $5.75 $7.65 $8.90 $8.90 Restaurant/Fast Food and Other Non -Residential: 1-inch or smaller water meter $19.10 $19.10 $19.10 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 1.5-inch water meter - $19.10 $21.75 $24.40 $24.80 $24.80 2-inch water meter - $24.25 $29.30 $32.95 $33.75 $33.75 3-inch water meter - $69.60 $84.75 $95.90 $99.65 $99.65 4-inch water meter - $86.40 $105.25 $119.25 $124.10 $124.10 5-inch water meter - $125.60 $153.20 $173.65 $181.05 $181.05 6-inch water meter - $170.45 $207.95 $235.80 $246.10 $246.10 8-inch water meter - $232.25 $283.55 $321.65 $335.95 $335.95 Volume Rate ($/kgal) Existing FYE 2017 FYE 2018 FYE 2019 FYE 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 Residential $1.70 $1.70 $1.70 $1.82 $1.90 $1.90 Multifamily $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Overnight Accommodations $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Restaurant/Fast Food $1.85 $2.22 $2.66 $3.20 $3.41 $3.41 Other Non -Residential $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 It should be noted that the recommended sewer rates shown in Table 11 reflect a multiple year transition from current rates to the cost of service rates identified in Table 9. Typically, it is desirable for rate changes to occur gradually over several years to avoid shocking customers with a sudden rate increase. Thus, the changes to the rate payment calculation method (additional unit Page 105 of 239 8-3 Old Business charges, wastewater strength charges, meter size charges, etc.) have all been phased in gradually to minimize potential impacts to any given customer. Based upon the customer information and assumptions supplied by Moab City, the recommended rates are projected to be overall revenue neutral compared to the calculated rates identified in the February 2017 Rate Study. As shown in the table, cost of service rates under the proposed plan would be fully implemented (along with required increases to meet expected revenue needs) by FYE 2021. No further changes in rates are currently shown in FYE 2022. Typically, after the initial few years of rate growth to bring rates in line with budgetary needs, the rates will subsequently need to be grown just to keep pace with inflation. This is not the case for Moab City rates primarily because loan payments remain steady while the predicted system and customer growth rates produce excess revenue to roughly offset inflation during the period analyzed. This projection should be revisited in the next rate study completed in 3 to 5 years. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis contained in this report, the following actions are recommended: Adopt Recommended Rates: It is recommended that Moab City adopt the rates summarized in Table 11. These increases are needed to meet immediate operation and maintenance needs and to fund capital expenditures to meet the City's longer -term system investment goals. The recommended rates will improve cost sharing fairness among the various customer classes within Moab City's sanitary sewer system. In addition to a general increase in rates, this includes two major changes from existing rates: • Multi -unit and Large Meter Based Rates - Instead of charging the same base rate to all accounts regardless of size, it is proposed that base rates be proportional to potential use of capacity in the system. To implement this principle, it is proposed that multi -unit accounts (including overnight accommodations) be based on the size and number of units per account and that larger commercial accounts be charged based on their water meter size. • Strength Based Volume Rates for Restaurants and Fast Food — It is also proposed that restaurants and fast food eateries be charged higher volume charges based on their higher strength wastewater. Consider a Multiple Year Rate Schedule: If at all possible, it is recommended that the City adopt the full multiple year rate schedule through FYE 2022. By adopting a multiple year rate schedule, the City can program the desired increases to the rates consistent with the results of this report and provide longer notice to customers. If it is necessary to make revisions in the future, the rate structure can always be modified. Continue Volumetric Billing Practices: It is recommended that the City continue the practice of billing the residential volumetric rates based on the average winter water usage rate during the months of November through February while billing all other classifications based on their actual monthly water usage. Update This Rate Study Periodically: After the implementation of any major change to the rate structure, we would suggest that the City monitor customer responses and system revenue for a period to two to three years. Following this initial observation period, the rates should be re - Page 106 of 239 8-3 Old Business examined to determine if there should be any subsequent rate adjustments. A comprehensive review of this rate study should also be performed in three to five years. The projections, assumptions, and data contained in this report may need to be revised over time. For these reasons, it is prudent to update the rates to ensure they are sufficient to meet system requirements, as well as maintain cost -of -service equity in charges to customers. Page 107 of 239 8-3 Old Business APPENDIX A DETAILED RATE TABLES Page 108 of 239 8-3 Old Business Table Al Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Historic Indoor Water Use FYE 2014 FYE 2015 FYE 2016 Customer Class Use (kgal) Flow ERUs Accounts Use per ERU(kgal) Use (kgal) Flow ERUs Accounts Use per FRU(kgal) Use (kgal) Flow ERUs Accounts Use/ERU (kgal/year) Use/Acct. (legal/year) Use/Acct. (legal/month) Residential 90,082 1,734 1,734 52.0 91,073 1,753 1,753 52.0 92,075 1,772 1,772 52.0 52.0 4.3 Multifamily 11,939 225 405 53.1 12,070 227 409 53.1 12,203 230 414 53.1 29.5 2.5 Overnight Accommodation: 80,730 1,937 60 41.7 81,618 1,958 60 41.7 82,516 1,980 61 41.7 1,352.7 112.7 Restaurant/Fast Food 18,672 387 42 48.2 18,877 392 43 48.2 19,085 396 43 48.2 443.8 37.0 Other Non -Residential 47,772 1,066 195 44.8 48,297 1,078 197 44.8 48,828 1,090 199 44.8 245.4 20.4 Total 249,194 5,350 2,435 r 46.6 251,935 5,409 2,462 r 46.6 254,706 5,468 2,489 46.6 102.3 8.5 Table Ala Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Projected Flow ERUs Customer Class Year Number of ERUs FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential Growth 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1,791 1,811 1,831 1,851 1,872 1,892 Multifamily 233 235 238 240 243 246 Overnight Accommodations 2,002 2,024 2,046 2,069 2,091 2,114 Restaurant/Fast Food 400 405 409 414 418 423 Other Non -Residential 1,102 1,114 1,126 1,139 1,151 1,164 Total 5,528 5,589 5,650 5,713 5,775 5,839 Table A2b Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Projected Accounts Customer Class Year Number of Accounts FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential % Growth 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1,791 1,811 1,831 1,851 1,871 1,892 Multifamily 419 424 429 434 439 444 Overnight Accommodations 62 63 64 65 66 67 Restaurant/Fast Food 43 43 43 43 43 43 Other Non -Residential 201 203 205 207 209 211 Total 2,516 2,544 2,572 2,600 2,628 2,657 Table A3 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Projected Annual Indoor Water Use Customer Class Avg. UseJERU/year Amount (kgal) FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential 52.0 93,062 94,101 95,140 96,180 97,271 98,310 Multifamily 53.1 12,362 12,468 12,627 12,733 12,892 13,052 Ovemight Accommodation: 41.7 83,433 84,349 85,266 86,225 87,142 88,100 Restaurant/Fast Food 48.2 19,277 19,518 19,711 19,952 20,145 20,386 Oth er Non -Res idential 44.8 49,366 49,903 50,441 51,023 51,561 52,143 Total 257,500 260,341 263,186 266,113 269,011 271,991 Table A4 Moab City - Sewer Rate Stuck Projected Total Wastewater Flow 2016 Moab Portion of Peak Month Flow at Tr eatmen t Plan t (mgd) = 0.78 Customer Class Amount (mgd) FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential 029 029 029 0.30 0.30 0.30 Multifamily 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Ovemight Accommodations 026 026 026 027 027 027 Restaurant/Fast Food 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 Other Non -Residential 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Total 0.79 0.80 0.81 0.82 0.83 0.84 Page 109 of 239 8-3 Old Business Table A5 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Peaking Factors Customer Class Est. Peak Hour Factor Residential 2.50 Multifamily 2.50 Ovemight Accarfu iodations 2.50 Restaurant/Fast Food 2.50 Other Non -Residential 2.50 Table A6 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Projected Flow Peaking Characteristics Customer Class Fstimated Peak Hour (mgd) FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential 0.64 0.64 0.65 0.66 0.67 0.67 Multifamily 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Overnight Accommodations 0.57 0.58 0.58 0.59 0.60 0.60 Restaurant/Fast Food 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Other Non -Residential 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.36 Total 1.76 1.78 1.80 1.82 1.84 1.86 Customer Class Peak Hour Excess Over Average Day (mgd) FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential 0.38 0.39 0.39 0.40 0.40 0.40 Multifamily 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Overnight Accommodations 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.36 Restaurant/Fast Food 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Other Non -Residential 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Total 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.11 1.12 Table A8 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Projected Strength Characteristics Customer Class BOD pbs/year) FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential 261,228 264,145 267,062 269,979 273,042 275,959 Multifamily 34,700 34,998 35,445 35,743 36,190 36,636 Overnight Accommodations 234,198 236,771 239,345 242,035 244,609 247,300 Restaurant/Fast Food 210,497 213,128 215,233 217,864 219,969 222,600 Other Non -Residential 138,571 140,080 141,589 143,224 144,733 146,367 Total 879,194 889,122 898,674 908,845 918,543 928,862 Customer Class TSS Obs/year) FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential 243,813 246,535 249,258 251,980 254,839 257,562 Multifamily 32,387 32,665 33,082 33,360 33,777 34,194 Ovemight Accommodations 218,585 220,987 223,389 225,900 228,302 230,813 Restaurant/Fast Food 58,261 58,989 59,572 60,300 60,883 61,611 Other Non -Residential 129,333 130,741 132,150 133,676 135,084 136,610 Total 682,379 689,917 697,451 705,216 712,885 720,790 Customer Class Weighted Average (Ibs/year) FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential 252,521 255,340 258,160 260,980 263,941 266,761 Multifamily 33,544 33,832 34,264 34,552 34,984 35,415 Overnight Accommodations 226,392 228,879 231,367 233,968 236,456 239,057 Restaurant/Fast Food 134,379 136,059 137,403 139,082 140,426 142,106 Other Non -Residential 133,952 135,411 136,870 138,450 139,909 141,489 Total 780,787 789,520 798,063 807,031 815,714 824,826 Table A7 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Strength Customer Class BOV (mg/L) TSS' (mg/L) Residential 300 280 Multifamily 300 280 Overnight Accommodations 300 280 Restaurant/Fast Food 1,1671 323 Other Non -Residential 300 280 Approximate Cost Division 50% 50% 'Based on historic sampling data from Moab and the 2012 Mount Olympus Residential Equivalence Study. Table A9 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Impact Fee Revenue Size of Meter Projected FYE2017 Projected FYE2018 Projected FYE2019 Projected FYE2020 Projected Projected FYE2021 FYE2022 Collections Impact Fee $83,891 $85,067 $122,044 $144,637 $147,367 $148,681 Treatment Impact Fee $104,678 $106,427 $205,960 $258,232 $263,620 $265,651 Total Impact Fee Revenue $188,569 $191,494 $328,003 $402,869 $410,987 $414,332 Table A10 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Non -Rate Revenue (Including Impact Fees) As sumed Inflation Rate = 3.0% Item Projected FYE2017 Projected FYE2018 Projected FYE2019 Projected FYE2020 Projected FYE2021 Projected FYE2022 Operations Non -Rate Revenue GWSSA Sewer Sales $296,157 $442,821 $464,107 $512,925 $536,720 $561,422 Special Services $1,500 $1,562 $1,626 $1,692 $1,762 $1,834 Septage Sales $76,755 $241,341 $247,302 $252,057 $258,342 $264,836 Sewer Connections $8,000 $8,328 $8,669 $9,025 $9,395 $9,780 Total Operations Non -Rate Revenue $382,412 $694,052 $721,704 $775,699 $806,219 $837,871 Non -Operations Non -Rate Revenue Impact Fees $188,569 $191,494 $328,003 $402,869 $410,987 $414,332 Finance Charges & Other Income $22,400 $23,318 $24,274 $25,270 $26,306 $27,384 Total Non -Operations Non -Rate Revenue $210,969 $214,813 $352,278 $428,138 $437,293 $441,716 Total Non -Rate Revenue $593,381 $908,865 $1,073,982 $1,203,837 $1,243,511 $1,279,587 Page 110 of 239 8-3 Old Business Table All Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Revenue Requirements Cash Basis Item Projected FYE2017 Projected FYE2018 Projected FYE2019 Projected FYE2020 Projected FYE2021 Projected FYE2022 Sewer Treatment Expenses General $190,000 $196,745 $203,729 $210,962 $218,451 $226,206 Salaries & Wages $138,579 $193,4991 $200,368 $207,481 $214,846 $222,473 Employee Benefits $104,702 $123,4191 $127,800 $132,337 $137,035 $141,900 Overtime $8,000 $8,284 $8,578 $8,883 $9,198 $9,524 Subscriptions & Memberships $4,600 $4,763 $4,932 $5,107 $5,289 $5,477 Travel $2,500 $2,589 $2,681 $2,776 $2,874 $2,976 Office Expenses & Supplies $2,000 $2,071 $2,145 $2,221 $2,299 $2,381 Equipment Supplies & Maintenance $50,500 $52,293 $54,149 $56,071 $58,062 $60,123 Building Supplies & Maintenance $5,000 $5,178 $5,361 $5,552 $5,749 $5,953 Utilities &Telephone $57,700 $109,74811 $113,644 $117,679 $121,856 $126,182 Equipment & Property Rental $2,500 $2,589 $2,681 $2,776 $2,874 $2,976 Fuel $12,000 $12,426 $12,867 $13,324 $13,797 $14,287 Shippinz/Freight $5,000 $5,178 $5,361 $5,552 $5,749 $5,953 Sewer Collections Expenses Capital Lease $21,600 $22,367 $23,161 $23,983 $24,834 $25,716 Salaries & Wages $139,798 $144,761 $149,900 $155,221 $160,732 $166,438 Employee Benefits $95,910 $99,315 $102,840 $106,491 $110,272 $114,186 Overtime $6,000 $6,213 $6,434 $6,662 $6,898 $7,143 Subscriptions & Memberships $1,560 $1,615 $1,673 $1,732 $1,794 $1,857 Travel $2,700 $2,796 $2,895 $2,998 $3,104 $3,215 Office Expenses & Supplies $1,500 $1,553 $1,608 $1,665 $1,725 $1,786 Equipment Supplies & Maintenance $30,000 $31,065 $32,168 $33,310 $34,492 $35,717 Budding Supplies & Maintenance $2,000 $2,071 $2,145 $2,221 $2,299 $2,381 Utilities & Telephone $6,100 $6,317 $6,541 $6,773 $7,013 $7,262 Equipement Rental $5,000 $5,178 $5,361 $5,552 $5,749 $5,953 Fuel $8,000 $8,284 $8,578 $8,883 $9,198 $9,524 Professional & Technical Services $33,500 $34,689 $35,921 $37,196 $38,516 $39,884 Education $6,350 $6,575 $6,809 $7,051 $7,301 $7,560 Freight $1,500 $1,553 $1,608 $1,665 $1,725 $1,786 Special Departmental Supplies $39,500 $40,902 $42,354 $43,858 $45,415 $47,027 Total O&M $984,099 $1,134,035 $1,174,293 $1,215,980 $1,259,147 $1,303,847 Debt Service Potential 2017 Treatment Plant Loan $0 $798,834 $798,834 $798,834 $798,834 $798,834 Potential 2019 South Trunk Loan $0 $0 $0 $78,758 $78,758 $78,758 Total Debt Service $0 $798,834 $798,834 $877,592 $877,592 $877,592 Expansion and Replacement FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Collection -Rehabilitation &Replacement $0 $0 $0 $669,941 $300,839 $710,741 Loaned Treatment Plant Capital Costs $3,900,000 $10,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Non -Loaned Treatment Plant Capital Costs $1,320,595 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 New South Trunk Pipeline $0 $300,000 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 Replace 400 East Trunk Pipeline $0 $0 $0 $0 $389,200 $0 Sewer Lift Station Pump $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SCADA Upgrades $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Building Project $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sewer Master Plan $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Loan Proceeds ($3,900,000) ($10,300,000) ($1,400,000) $0 $0 $0 Transfer to/(from) Reserve Fund ($991,082) ($185,931) $81,747 $3,649 $68,644 $57,660 Total Capital Outlays $547,513 $114,069 $481,747 $673,591 $758,684 $768,400 Total Revenue Requirements $1,531,612 $2,046,937 $2,454,874 $2,767,163 $2,895,423 $2,949,840 LESS: Operations Non -Rate Revenue $382,412 $694,052 $721,704 $775,699 $806,219 $837,871 Non -Operations Non -Rate Revenue $210,969 $214,813 $352,278 $428,138 $437,293 $441,716 Net Revenue Requirements $ 938,231 $ 1,138,073 $ 1,380,892 $ 1,563,326 $ 1,651,912 $ 1,670,252 Table Al2 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Cost Allocation Percentages to Service Characteristics Item Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Sewer Treatment Expenses General 30% 40% 15% 15% 100% Salaries & Wages 30% 40% 15% 15% 100% Employee Benefits 30% 40% 15% 15% 100% Overtime 30% 40% 15% 15% 100% Subscriptions & Memberships 10% 0% 10% 80% 100% Travel 10% 0% 10% 80% 100% Office Expenses & Supplies 10% 0% 10% 80% 100% Equipment Supplies & Maintenance 30% 35% 20% 15% 100% Building Supplies & Maintenance 30% 45% 10% 15% 100% Utilities & Telephone 50% 15% 20% 15% 100% Equipment & Property Rental 40% 25% 20% 15% 100% Fuel 30% 25% 30% 15% 100% Shipping/Freight 30% 25% 30% 15% 100% Sewer Collections Expenses Capital Lease 40% 30% 0% 30% 100% Salaries & Wages 30% 50% 0% 20% 100% Employee Benefits 40% 40% 0% 20% 100% Overtime 40% 40% 0% 20% 100% Subscriptions & Memberships 20% 10% 0% 70% 100% Travel 20% 10% 0% 70% 100% Office Expenses & Supplies 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% Equipment Supplies & Maintenance 40% 45% 0% 15% 100% Building Supplies & Maintenance 40% 45% 0% 15% 100% Utilities & Telephone 40% 30% 0% 30% 100% Equip ement Rental 50% 35% 0% 15% 100% Fuel 50% 35% 0% 15% 100% Professional & Technical Services 40% 45% 0% 15% 100% Education 50% 20% 0% 30% 100% Freight 50% 35% 0% 15% 100% Special Departmental Supplies 40% 30% 0% 30% 100% Table A13 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Fixed Assets Allocations to Service Characteristics Item Percent Allocated Amount Assets Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Collection System (20 year) $9,031,460 5% 75% 0% 20% 100% $451,573 $6,773,595 $0 $1,806,292 $9,031,460 Treatment Plant $12,504,000 10% 35% 35% 20%, 100% $1,250,400 $4,376,400 $4,376,400 $2,500,800 $12,504,000 Total $21,535,460 $1,701,973 $11,149,995 $4,376,400 $4,307,092 $21,535,460 Percent 7.9% 51.8% 20.3% 20.0% 100.0% Page 111 of 239 8-3 Old Business Table A14 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Allocation of O&M Costs to Service Characteristics Item FYE2017 FYE2018 FVE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Sewer Treatment Expenses General $57,000 $76,000 $28,500 $28,500 $190,000 $59,024 $78,698 $29,512 $29,512 $196,745 $61,119 $81,492 $30,559 $30,559 $203,729 $63,289 $84,385 $31,644 $31,644 $210,962 $65,535 $87,380 $32,768 $32,768 $218,451 $67,862 $90,482 $33,931 $33,931 $226,206 Salaries & Wages $41,574 $55,432 $20,787 $20,787 $138,579 $58,050 $77,399 $29,025 $29,025 $193,499 $60,110 $80,147 $30,055 $30,055 $200,368 $62,244 $82,992 $31,122 $31,122 $207,481 $64,454 $85,939 $32,227 $32,227 $214,846 $66,742 $88,989 $33,371 $33,371 $222,473 Employee Benefits $31,411 $41,881 $15,705 $15,705 $104,702 $37,026 $49,368 $18,513 $18,513 $123,419 $38,340 $51,120 $19,170 $19,170 $127,800 $39,701 $52,935 $19,851 $19,851 $132,337 $41,111 $54,814 $20,555 $20,555 $137,035 $42,570 $56,760 $21,285 $21,285 $141,900 Overtime $2,400 $3,200 $1,200 $1,200 $8,000 $2,485 $3,314 $1,243 $1,243 $8,284 $2,573 $3,431 $1,287 $1,287 $8,578 $2,665 $3,553 $1,332 $1,332 $8,883 $2,759 $3,679 $1,380 $1,380 $9,198 $2,857 $3,810 $1,429 $1,429 $9,524 Subscriptions & Memberships $460 $0 $460 $3,680 $4,600 $476 $0 $476 $3,811 $4,763 $493 $0 $493 $3,946 $4,932 $511 $0 $511 $4,086 $5,107 $529 $0 $529 $4,231 $5,289 $548 $0 $548 $4,381 $5,477 Travel $250 $0 $250 $2,000 $2,500 $259 $0 $259 $2,071 $2,589 $268 $0 $268 $2,145 $2,681 $278 $0 $278 $2,221 $2,776 $287 $0 $287 $2,299 $2,874 $298 $0 $298 $2,381 $2,976 Office Expenses & Supplies $200 $0 $200 $1,600 $2,000 $207 $0 $207 $1,657 $2,071 $214 $0 $214 $1,716 $2,145 $222 $0 $222 $1,777 $2,221 $230 $0 $230 $1,840 $2,299 $238 $0 $238 $1,905 $2,381 Equipment Supplies & Maintenance $15,150 $17,675 $10,100 $7,575 $50,500 $15,688 $18,302 $10,459 $7,844 $52,293 $16,245 $18,952 $10,830 $8,122 $54,149 $16,821 $19,625 $11,214 $8,411 $56,071 $17,419 $20,322 $11,612 $8,709 $58,062 $18,037 $21,043 $12,025 $9,018 $60,123 Budding Supplies & Maintenance $1,500 $2,250 $500 $750 $5,000 $1,553 $2,330 $518 $777 $5,178 $1,608 $2,413 $536 $804 $5,361 $1,665 $2,498 $555 $833 $5,552 $1,725 $2,587 $575 $862 $5,749 $1,786 $2,679 $595 $893 $5,953 Utilities & Telephone $28,850 $8,655 $11,540 $8,655 $57,700 $54,874 $16,462 $21,950 $16,462 $109,748 $56,822 $17,047 $22,729 $17,047 $113,644 $58,839 $17,652 $23,536 $17,652 $117,679 $60,928 $18,278 $24,371 $18,278 $121,856 $63,091 $18,927 $25,236 $18,927 $126,182 Equipment & Property Rental $1,000 $625 $500 $375 $2,500 $1,036 $647 $518 $388 $2,589 $1,072 $670 $536 $402 $2,681 $1,110 $694 $555 $416 $2,776 $1,150 $719 $575 $431 $2,874 $1,191 $744 $595 $446 $2,976 Fuel $3,600 $3,000 $3,600 $1,800 $12,000 $3,728 $3,107 $3,728 $1,864 $12,426 $3,860 $3,217 $3,860 $1,930 $12,867 $3,997 $3,331 $3,997 $1,999 $13,324 $4,139 $3,449 $4,139 $2,070 $13,797 $4,286 $3,572 $4,286 $2,143 $14,287 Shipping/Freight $1,500 $1,250 $1,500 $750 $5,000 $1,553 $1,294 $1,553 $777 $5,178 $1,608 $1,340 $1,608 $804 $5,361 $1,665 $1,388 $1,665 $833 $5,552 $1,725 $1,437 $1,725 $862 $5,749 $1,786 $1,488 $1,786 $893 $5,953 Sewer Collections Expenses Capital Lease $8,640 $6,480 $0 $6,480 $21,600 $8,947 $6,710 $0 $6,710 $22,367 $9,264 $6,948 $0 $6,948 $23,161 $9,593 $7,195 $0 $7,195 $23,983 $9,934 $7,450 SO $7,450 $24,834 $10,286 $7,715 $0 $7,715 $25,716 Salaries & Wages $41,939 $69,899 $0 $27,960 $139,798 $43,428 $72,380 $0 $28,952 $144,761 $44,970 $74,950 $0 $29,980 $149,900 $46,566 $77,611 $0 $31,044 $155,221 $48,219 $80,366 $0 $32,146 $160,732 $49,931 $83,219 $0 $33,288 $166,438 Employee Benefits $38,364 $38,364 $0 $19,182 $95,910 $39,726 $39,726 $0 $19,863 $99,315 $41,136 $41,136 $0 $20,568 $102,840 $42,597 $42,597 $0 $21,298 $106,491 $44,109 $44,109 $0 $22,054 $110,272 $45,675 $45,675 $0 $22,837 $114,186 Overtime $2,400 $2,400 $0 $1,200 $6,000 $2,485 $2,485 $0 $1,243 $6,213 $2,573 $2,573 $0 $1,287 $6,434 $2,665 $2,665 $0 $1,332 $6,662 $2,759 $2,759 SO $1,380 $6,898 $2,857 $2,857 $0 $1,429 $7,143 Subscriptions & Memberships $312 $156 $0 $1,092 $1,560 $323 $162 $0 $1,131 $1,615 $335 $167 $0 $1,171 $1,673 $346 $173 $0 $1,212 $1,732 $359 $179 $0 $1,256 $1,794 $371 $186 $0 $1,300 $1,857 Travel $540 $270 $0 $1,890 $2,700 $559 $280 $0 $1,957 $2,796 $579 $290 $0 $2,027 $2,895 $600 $300 $0 $2,099 $2,998 $621 $310 $0 $2,173 $3,104 $643 $321 $0 $2,250 $3,215 Office Expenses & Supplies $0 $0 $0 $1,500 $1,500 $0 $0 SO $1,553 $1,553 $0 $0 $0 $1,608 $1,608 $0 $0 $0 $1,665 $1,665 $0 $0 $0 $1,725 $1,725 $0 $0 $0 $1,786 $1,786 Equipment Supplies & Maintenance $12,000 $13,500 $0 $4,500 $30,000 $12,426 $13,979 $0 $4,660 $31,065 $12,867 $14,476 $0 $4,825 $32,168 $13,324 $14,989 $0 $4,996 $33,310 $13,797 $15,522 $0 $5,174 $34,492 $14,287 $16,073 $0 $5,358 $35,717 Building Supplies & Maintenance $800 $900 $0 $300 $2,000 $828 $932 $0 $311 $2,071 $858 $965 $0 $322 $2,145 $888 $999 $0 $333 $2,221 $920 $1,035 $0 $345 $2,299 $952 $1,072 $0 $357 $2,381 Utilities & Telephone $2,440 $1,830 $0 $1,830 $6,100 $2,527 $1,895 $0 $1,895 $6,317 $2,616 $1,962 $0 $1,962 $6,541 $2,709 $2,032 $0 $2,032 $6,773 $2,805 $2,104 $0 $2,104 $7,013 $2,905 $2,179 $0 $2,179 $7,262 Equipement Rental $2,500 $1,750 $0 $750 $5,000 $2,589 $1,812 $0 $777 $5,178 $2,681 $1,876 $0 $804 $5,361 $2,776 $1,943 $0 $833 $5,552 $2,874 $2,012 $0 $862 $5,749 $2,976 $2,083 $0 $893 $5,953 Fuel $4,000 $2,800 $0 $1,200 $8,000 $4,142 $2,899 $0 $1,243 $8,284 $4,289 $3,002 $0 $1,287 $8,578 $4,441 $3,109 $0 $1,332 $8,883 $4,599 $3,219 $0 $1,380 $9,198 $4,762 $3,334 $0 $1,429 $9,524 Professional& Technical Services $13,400 $15,075 $0 $5,025 $33,500 $13,876 $15,610 $0 $5,203 $34,689 $14,368 $16,164 $0 $5,388 $35,921 $14,878 $16,738 $0 $5,579 $37,196 $15,407 $17,332 $0 $5,777 $38,516 $15,953 $17,948 $0 $5,983 $39,884 Education $3,175 $1,270 $0 $1,905 $6,350 $3,288 $1,315 $0 $1,973 $6,575 $3,404 $1,362 $0 $2,043 $6,809 $3,525 $1,410 $0 $2,115 $7,051 $3,650 $1,460 $0 $2,190 $7,301 $3,780 $1,512 $0 $2,268 $7,560 Freight $750 $525 $0 $225 $1,500 $777 $544 $0 $233 $1,553 $804 $563 $0 $241 $1,608 $833 $583 $0 $250 $1,665 $862 $604 $0 $259 $1,725 $893 $625 $0 $268 $1,786 Special Departmental Supplies $15,800 $11,850 $0 $11,850 $39,500 $16,361 $12,271 $0 $12,271 $40,902 $16,942 $12,706 $0 $12,706 $42,354 $17,543 $13,157 $0 $13,157 $43,858 $18,166 $13,624 $0 $13,624 $45,415 $18,811 $14,108 $0 $14,108 $47,027 Total $331,955 $377,036 $94,842 $180,266 $984,099 $388,239 $423,921 $117,959 $203,915 $1,134,035 $402,022 $438,970 $122,147 $211,154 $1,174,293 $416,293 $454,554 $126,483 $218,650 $1,215,980 $431,072 $470,691 $130,973 $226,412 $1,259,147 $446,375 $487,400 $135,622 $234,450 $1,303,847 Percent 33.7% 38.3% 9.6% 18.3% 100.0% 34.2% 37.4% 10.4% 18.0% 100.0% 34.2% 37.4% 10.4% 18.0% 100.0% 34.2% 37.4% 10.4% 18.0% 100.0% 34.2% 37.4% 10.4% 18.0% 100.0% 34.2% 37.4% 10.4% 18.0% 100.0% Table A15 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Revenue Requirements by Service Characteristics Item F1E2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total 0&M $331,955 $377,036 $94,842 $180,266 $984,099 $388,239 $423,921 $117,959 $203,915 $1,134,035 $402,022 $438,970 $122,147 $211,154 $1,174,293 $416,293 $454,554 $126,483 $218,650 $1,215,980 $431,072 $470,691 $130,973 $226,412 $1,259,147 $446,375 $487,400 $135,622 $234,450 $1,303,847 Debt Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $63,133 $413,597 $162,338 $159,767 $798,834 $63,133 $413,597 $162,338 $159,767 $798,834 $69,357 $454,374 $178,343 $175,518 $877,592 $69,357 $454,374 $178,343 $175,518 $877,592 $69,357 $454,374 $178,343 $175,518 $877,592 Capital Outlays $43,271 $283,475 $111,265 $109,503 $547,513 $9,015 $59,059 $23,181 $22,814 $114,069 $38,073 $249,425 $97,900 $96,349 $481,747 $53,235 $348,752 $136,886 $134,718 $673,591 $59,960 $392,809 $154,178 $151,737 $758,684 $60,728 $397,840 $156,153 $153,680 $768,400 Less: Operations Non -Rate Revenue $128,994 $146,513 $36,855 $70,050 $382,412 $237,610 $259,448 $72,193 $124,800 $694,052 $247,077 $269,785 $75,070 $129,772 $721,704 $265,562 $289,969 $80,686 $139,481 $775,699 $276,011 $301,378 $83,861 $144,969 $806,219 $286,847 $313,210 $87,153 $150,661 $837,871 Less: Expansion Non -Rate Revenue $16,673 $109,229 $42,873 $42,194 $210,969 $16,977 $111,219 $43,654 $42,963 $214,813 $27,841 $182,392 $71,589 $70,456 $352,278 $33,836 $221,669 $87,006 $85,628 $428,138 $34,560 $226,409 $88,866 $87,459 $437,293 $34,909 $228,699 $89,765 $88,343 $441,716 Total $229,558 $404,769 I $126,379 $177,525 $938,231 $205,800 $525,909 $187,630 $218,733 $1,138,073 $228,310 $649,815 $235,725 $267,042 $1,380,892 $239,487 $746,042 $274,020 $303,778 $1,563,326 $249,818 $790,087 $290,768 $321,240 $1,651,912 $254,703 $797,704 $293,201 $324,644 I $1,670,252 Table A16 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Cost Allocations to Customer Classes FYE2017 FYE2018 FVE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Volume Capacity Strength Customer Total Residential $82,964 $131,140 $40,873 $126,370 $381,347 $74,387 $170,410.06 $60,682 $155,710 $461,189 $82,533 $210,586 $76,253 $190,107 $559,479 $86,556 $241,716 $88,613 $216,266 $633,152 $90,331 $256,111 $94,084 $228,706 $669,232 $92,061 $258,479 $94,825 $231,173 $676,538 Multifamily $11,021 $17,061 $5,429 $29,564 $63,075 $9,856 $22,112.85 $8,040 $36,455 $76,464 $10,954 $27,373 $10,120 $44,542 $92,989 $11,459 $31,341 $11,732 $50,708 $105,239 $11,973 $33,245 $12,470 $53,662 $111,350 $12,222 $33,608 $12,589 $54,250 $112,669 Ovemight Accommodations $74,379 $146,590 $36,644 $4,375 $261,988 $66,678 $190,452.77 $54,393 $5,417 $316,941 $73,967 $235,313 $68,339 $6,645 $384,265 $77,597 $270,184 $79,442 $7,594 $434,817 $80,925 $286,073 $84,286 $8,068 $459,352 $82,501 $288,808 $84,977 $8,186 $464,472 Restaurant/Fast Food $17,186 $29,289 $21,751 $3,034 $71,259 $15,429 $38,109.37 $32,334 $3,697 $89,570 $17,099 $47,040 $40,585 $4,465 $109,188 $17,956 $54,063 $47,224 $5,024 $124,267 $18,708 $57,187 $50,056 $5,256 $131,207 $19,090 $57,789 $50,514 $5,254 $132,647 OtherNon-Residential$44,009 $80,690 $21,682 $14,182 $160,563 $39,449 $104,824.30 $32,180 $17,454 $193,907 $43,757 $129,503 $40,427 $21,284 $234,972 $45,918 $148,738 $47,009 $24,185 $265,851 $47,882 $157,470 $49,871 $25,548 $280,771 $48,829 $159,022 $50,295 $25,781 $283,927 Total $229,558 $404,769 $126,379 $177,525 $938,231 $205,800 $525,909 $187,630 $218,733 $1,138,073 $228,310 $649,815 $235,725 $267,042 $1,380,892 $239,487 $746,042 $274,020 $303,778 $1,563,326 $249,818 $790,087 $290,768 $321,240 $1,651,912 $254,703 $797,704 $293,201 $324,644 $1,670,252 Page 112 of 239 8-3 Old Business Table A17 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Existing Rate and Projected Revenue at the Existing Rate Base Rate / Month Existing Accounts ERUs Effective Rate Per ERU Residential $ 14.40 1,772 1,772 $ 14.40 Multifamily $ 19.10 414 230 $ 34.38 Ovemight Accommodations $ 19.10 61 1,980 $ 0.59 Restaurant/Fast Food $ 19.10 43 396 $ 2.07 Other Non -Residential $ 19.10 199 1,090 $ 3.49 Volume Rate / kgal Existing Residential $ 1.70 Multifamily $ 1.85 Ovemight Accommodations $ 1.85 Restaurant/Fast Food $ 1.85 OtherNon-Residential$ 1.85 Table A18 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Calculated Rates (Cost of Service) Monthly Account Base Rate FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential $ 7.16 $ 8.65 $ 9.74 $ 10.19 $ 10.18 Multifamily $ 7.16 $ 8.65 $ 9.74 $ 10.19 $ 10.18 Overnight Accommodations $ 7.16 $ 8.65 $ 9.74 $ 10.19 $ 10.18 Restaurant/Fast Food $ 7.16 $ 8.65 $ 9.74 $ 10.19 $ 10.18 Other Non -Residential $ 7.16 $ 8.65 $ 9.74 $ 10.19 $ 10.18 Monthly ERU Bas e Rate 1 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential $7.84 $9.58 $10.88 $11.40 $11.38 Multifamily $7.84 $9.58 $10.88 $11.40 $11.38 Overnight Accommodations $7.84 $9.58 $10.88 $11.40 $11.38 Restaurant/Fast Food $7.84 $9.58 $10.88 $11.40 $11.38 Other Non -Residential $7.84 $9.58 $10.88 $11.40 $11.38 Volume Rate FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Volume Component Residential $ 0.79 $ 0.87 $ 0.90 $ 0.93 $ 0.94 Multifamily $ 0.79 $ 0.87 $ 0.90 $ 0.93 $ 0.94 Overnight Accommodations $ 0.79 $ 0.87 $ 0.90 $ 0.93 $ 0.94 Restaurant/Fast Food $ 0.79 $ 0.87 $ 0.90 $ 0.93 $ 0.94 Other Non -Residential $ 0.79 $ 0.87 $ 0.90 $ 0.93 $ 0.94 Strength Component Residential $ 0.64 $ 0.80 $ 0.92 $ 0.97 $ 0.96 Multifamily $ 0.64 $ 0.80 $ 0.92 $ 0.97 $ 0.96 Overnight Accommodations $ 0.64 $ 0.80 $ 0.92 $ 0.97 $ 0.96 Restaurant/Fast Food $ 1.66 $ 2.06 $ 2.37 $ 2.48 $ 2.48 Other Non -Residential $ 0.64 $ 0.80 $ 0.92 $ 0.97 $ 0.96 Total Volume Rate Residential $ 1.44 $ 1.67 $ 1.82 $ 1.90 $ 1.90 Multifamily $ 1.44 $ 1.67 $ 1.82 $ 1.90 $ 1.90 Overnight Accommodations $ 1.44 $ 1.67 $ 1.82 $ 1.90 $ 1.90 Restaurant/Fast Food $ 2.45 $ 2.93 $ 3.27 $ 3.41 $ 3.41 Other Non -Residential $ 1.44 $ 1.67 $ 1.82 $ 1.90 $ 1.90 Meter Size FYE2017 FYE2018 FVE2019 FYE2020 FVE2021 FYE2022 Residential $ 309,485 $ 312,941 $ 316,397 $ 319,853 $ 323,482 $ 326,938 Multifamily $ 96,126 $ 96,952 $ 98,189 $ 99,014 $ 100,252 $ 101,490 Ovemight Accot dations $ 14,137 $ 14,292 $ 14,447 $ 14,610 $ 14,765 $ 14,927 Restaurant/Fast Food $ 9,955 $ 10,080 $ 10,179 $ 10,304 $ 10,403 $ 10,528 Other Non -Residential $ 46,113 $ 46,615 $ 47,117 $ 47,661 $ 48,163 $ 48,707 FYE2017 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FYE2021 FYE2022 Residential $ 158,206 $ 159,972 $ 161,739 $ 163,506 $ 165,361 $ 167,127 Multifamily $ 22,870 $ 23,066 $ 23,360 $ 23,557 $ 23,851 $ 24,146 Ovemight Accommodations $ 154,350 $ 156,047 $ 157,743 $ 159,516 $ 161,212 $ 162,985 Restaurant/Fast Food $ 35,663 $ 36,109 $ 36,466 $ 36,911 $ 37,268 $ 37,714 OtherNon-Residential$ 91,327 $ 92,321 $ 93,316 $ 94,393 $ 95,388 $ 96,465 Table A19 Moab City - Sewer Rate Study Recommended Rates Monthly Base Rate Existing FYE2017 Adopted2018 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FVE2021 FYE2022 Single Family $14.40 $17.28 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 Multifamily 1st Unit (2 Bedrooms or Larger) $19.10 $22.92 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 +Charge per each additional unit - - $2.80 $7.35 $9.80 $11.40 $11.40 Multifamily 1st Unit (1 Bedroom or Smaller) $19.10 $22.92 $14.60 $15.80 $17.00 $16.55 $16.55 + Charge per each additional unit - - $1.60 $4.10 $5.50 $6.40 $6.40 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit With Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms or Larger $19.10 $22.92 $16.40 $20.45 $23.25 $23.85 $23.85 +Charge per each additional unit - - $3.40 $8.80 $11.75 $13.65 $13.65 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit With Kitchen, 1 Bedroom or Smaller $19.10 $22.92 $15.85 $19.00 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 +Charge per each additional unit - - $2.80 $7.35 $9.80 $11.40 $11.40 Overnight Accommodations: 1st Unit Hotel/Motel (No Kitchen) $19.10 $22.92 $15.25 $17.40 $19.15 $19.10 $19.10 + Charge per each additional unit - - $2.20 $5.75 $7.65 $8.90 $8.90 Restaurant/Fast Food and Other Non- Residential: 1-inch or smaller water meter $19.10 S22.92 $19.10 $19.10 $21.30 $21.55 $21.55 1.5-inch water meter $19.10 $21.75 $24.40 $24.80 $24.80 2-inch water meter $24.25 $29.30 $32.95 $33.75 $33.75 3-inch water meter - $69.60 $84.75 $95.90 $99.65 $99.65 4-inch water meter - $86.40 $105.25 $119.25 $124.10 $124.10 5-inch water meter - $125.60 $153.20 $173.65 $181.05 $181.05 6-inch water meter - $170.45 $207.95 $235.80 $246.10 $246.10 8-inch water meter $232.25 $283.55 $321.65 $335.95 $335.95 Volume Rate ($/kgal) Existing FYE2017 Adopted2018 FYE2018 FYE2019 FYE2020 FVE2021 FYE2022 Residential $1.70 $2.04 $1.70 $1.70 $1.82 $1.90 $1.90 Multifamily $1.85 $2.22 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Overnight Accommodations $1.85 $2.22 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Restaurant/Fast Food $1.85 $2.22 $2.22 $2.66 $3.20 $3.41 $3.41 Other Non -Residential $1.85 $2.22 $1.85 $1.85 $1.85 $1.90 $1.90 Page 113 of 239 8-3 Old Business Draper, Utah Office: 154 East 14000 South Draper, Utah 84020 Phone: (801) 495-2224 Fax: (801) 495-2225 Eagle, Idaho Office: 776 East Riverside Drive Suite 250 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Phone: (208) 939-9561 Fax: (208) 939-9571 WWW.BOWENCOLLINS.COM Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS St. George, Utah Office: 20 North Main Suite 107 St. George, Utah 84770 Phone: (435) 656-3299 Fax: (435) 656-2190 8-3 Old Business Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: July 25, 2017 #: 8-4 Title: Documents that Establish Engineering Standards for the City of Moab Regarding Culinary Water, Wastewater, and Public Works (AWPA) Date Submitted: July 18, 2017 Staff Presenter: Mark Jolissaint, Staff Engineer Attachment(s): - Proposed Resolution #46-2017 Wastewater System Design Criteria Manual (clean version) Wastewater System Design Criteria Manual (underline/strikethrough version) Water System Design Criteria Manual excerpted change - Water System Design Criteria Manual (clean version) Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: I move to adopt the "Resolution Adopting the Water System Design Criteria Manual, Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual, And APWA Manual of Standard Specifications (Utah Chapter)." Background/Summary: Update : The resolution was tabled at the July 11, 2017 council meeting so that revisions could be made to the Water System Design Criteria Manual and Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual. A single modification made to the Water Criteria is attached here as an excerpt from the complete document; no other changes were made to that document. Significant revisions were made to the Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual, however; a clean and an underline/strikethrough copy are included here. These documents formalize the engineering and design standards for development within the City of Moab. Page 115 of 239 8-4 Old Business CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION #46-2017 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL, WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL, AND APWA MANUAL OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (UTAH CHAPTER) WHEREAS, the City, to maintain the quality of new infrastructure improvements, desired to assess and update its minimum criteria and standards for said improvements; and, WHEREAS, the Moab City Council (Council) approved Ordinance No. 2017-02, a temporary moratorium on new commercial site plan applications pending the revision of city ordinances relating to said criteria and standards; and, WHEREAS, with the aid of a consultant, Hansen, Allen & Luce, Inc., appropriate criteria and standards were developed or selected from extant material. NOW, THEREFORE, be it Resolved by the Moab City Council, that the Water System Design Criteria Manual, Wastewater System Design Criteria Manual, and APWA Manual of Standard Specifications (Utah Chapter) are adopted. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on , 2017. SIGNED: David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel Stenta, Recorder Page 116 of 239 8-4 Old Business WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL Effective Date: July 14, 2017 Page 117 of 239 8-4 Old Business Table of Contents Contents 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Jurisdiction 1 1.3 Purpose 1 1.4 Amendments and Revisions 1 1.5 Enforcement Responsibility 2 1.6 Review and Acceptance 2 1.7 Interpretation 2 1.8 Relationship to Other Standards 3 1.8.1 State Public Wastewater System Code and Rules 3 1.8.2 State Construction Code 3 1.9 Variances from these Criteria 3 1.10 Adoption of the Utah Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications 3 1.11 Gray Water Irrigation Systems 3 1.12 Special Wastes and Industrial Pre -Treatment 4 1.13 Acronyms 5 1.14 Definitions of Terms 6 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 Planning Policy 9 2.3 Design Policy 9 2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy 9 2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy 10 2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy 10 2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy 10 2.8 Duty of the Engineer Preparing Development Documents 11 3.1 Introduction 12 3.2 Review Process 12 3.2.1 Pre -Application Consultation 12 3.2.2 Wastewater Utility Report Requirements 12 3.2.2.1 Format 12 ii Page 118 of 239 8-4 Old Business Table of Contents 3.2.2.2 Stand -Alone Document 12 3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy 13 3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies 13 3.3 Acceptance 13 3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction 13 3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report 13 3.4 Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report 13 3.4.1 Wastewater System Modeling 16 3.5. City Designation of Connection Points 16 3.6. Geotechnical Investigation and Report 16 3.7 Final Wastewater Utility Report 16 3.7.1 Wastewater System Modeling 19 3.7.2 Disclaimer 19 3.8 Construction Drawings 19 3.8.1 Wastewater System Improvements 19 3.8.2 Indemnification Statement 19 3.8.3 Construction Drawing Requirements 20 3.8.3.1 Wastewater Utility Construction Drawings 20 3.9 Record Drawings 22 4.1 Design Criteria - Reference Design Documents 23 4.2 Prohibited Installations 23 4.3 Unlawful Connections 23 4.4 Minimum Wastewater System Design Criteria 24 4.4.1 Design Flows 24 4.4.2 Hydraulic Design 24 4.4.3 Pipe Sizes and Grades 25 4.4.4 Selection of Pipe Material 25 4.4.5 General Wastewater System Layout Criteria 25 4.4.5.1 Location 25 4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout 25 4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout 26 4.4.5.4 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing a Water Main 26 Page 119 of 239 8-4 Old Business Table of Contents 4.4.5.5 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing of a Storm Drain 26 4.4.5.6 Limits on Minimum Vertical Clearance 26 4.4.6 Bored Crossings 26 4.4.7 Manholes 27 4.4.7.1 Layout 27 4.4.7.2 Manhole Sizing 28 4.4.7.3 Drop Manholes 28 4.4.7.4 Main Connections to Existing Manholes 29 4.4.7.5 Sanitary Sewers and Manholes Greater than 20 Feet 29 4.4.8 Inverted Wastewater Siphons 29 4.4.9 Fill Areas 29 4.4.10 Future Connections 29 4.4.11 Sanitary Sewer Service Lines 29 4.4.12.1 Ownership 29 4.4.12.2 Layout 30 4.4.12.3 Cleanouts 30 4.4.12.4 Structural Requirements 30 4.5 Easements 30 4.6 Sand/Oil and Grease Interceptors 31 5.1 Sewage Pump Stations (Lift Stations) and Force Mains 32 5.1.1 Scope 32 5.1.2 Compliance with State of Utah Standards 32 5.1.3 City Review and Approval 32 5.1.4 Flood Protection 32 5.1.5 Accessibility and Security 32 5.1.6 Grit 32 5.1.7 Station Ventilation 32 5.1.8 Odor Control 33 5.2 Minimum Lift Station Design Criteria 33 5.3 Pump Equipment and Protection 34 5.3.1 Pump Characteristics 34 5.3.2 Pump Protection 35 iv Page 120 of 239 8-4 Old Business Table of Contents 5.4 Overflow Basins 35 5.5 Force Main Design Criteria 35 5.5.1 Pipe Materials 35 5.5.2 Velocity and Pipe Diameter 35 5.5.3 Pipe and Design Pressure 35 5.5.4 Shutoff and Check Valves 35 5.5.5 Isolation Valves 36 5.5.6 Combination Air Release and Air/Vacuum Valves 36 5.5.7 Drain Valves 36 5.5.8 Cleanouts 36 5.5.9 Termination 36 5.5.10 Identification 36 v Page 121 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions 1.1 Introduction These criteria and design standards together with all future amendments shall be known as the The City of Moab Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual (hereafter called "Criteria"). All utility reports and plans, analyses, and designs, submitted as a requirement of the City of Moab Regulations (hereafter called "Regulations"), shall comply with these Criteria. 1.2 Jurisdiction These Criteria shall apply to all land within the incorporated area of the City of Moab, or served by the City, including any public lands. These Criteria shall apply to all systems and facilities constructed in or on City Rights -of -Way, easements dedicated for utilities across public or private property, easements for public use, and to all privately owned and maintained system facilities. 1.3 Purpose Presented in these Criteria are the policies and minimum technical criteria for the planning, analysis and design of wastewater collection systems within the boundaries of the City of Moab and areas served by the City. All subdivisions, site plans or any other proposed construction submitted for acceptance under the provisions of the Regulations shall include adequate and appropriate wastewater system planning, analysis, and design. Such planning, analysis, and design shall conform with or exceed the Criteria set forth herein. Wastewater collection system planning, analysis, and design that require policies and technical expertise not specifically addressed in these Criteria shall follow the provisions of the Utah State Code and Utah Code Annotated. In the event of a conflict, the State of Utah Codes and Rules will prevail. Interpretation will be provided by the City of Moab and/or the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Quality. 1.4 Amendments and Revisions Policies and criteria may be amended as new technology is developed or if experience gained in the use of these Criteria indicates a need for revision. All technical criteria and policy changes must be recommended by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Minor revisions will require the approval of the City. All major revisions will require adoption, by resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The City Engineer and Public Works Director shall monitor the performance and effectiveness of these Criteria and will recommend amendments and revisions as needed. 1 Page 122 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions TABLE 1-1 EXAMPLES OF MINOR AND MAJOR REVISIONS MINOR MAJOR Grammar Policy Changes Submittal Requirements Clarifications Construction Detail Revisions for clarification, minor modification Technical Criteria Changes 1.5 Enforcement Responsibility The City shall review all wastewater system reports, plans, analyses, and designs, submitted as a requirement of the Regulations, for compliance with these Criteria. The Regulations are enforced by the City of Moab and authorized representatives. 1.6 Review and Acceptance The City shall review all submittals for general compliance with these Criteria. An acceptance by the City does not relieve the Owner, Engineer, or Designer from the responsibility of ensuring that the design, calculations, plans, specifications, construction, and record drawings are in compliance with these Criteria, and in compliance with other applicable State and Federal regulations. The City may, but is not required to, refer submittals to other agencies that have an interest or responsibility for wastewater system issues. Other review agencies may include regional, State, or Federal agencies responsible for wastewater collection, industrial pretreatment, treatment and other wastewater related issues. 1.7 Interpretation In the interpretation and application of these Criteria, the provisions shall be regarded as the minimum requirements for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. These Criteria shall therefore be regarded as remedial and shall be liberally construed to further its underlying purposes. Whenever a provision of these Criteria and any other provision of the Regulations or any provision in any law, ordinance, resolution, rule or regulation of any kind, contains any requirement(s) covering any of the same subject matter, the requirements that are more restrictive or impose higher standards shall govern, as determined by the City. 2 Page 123 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions These Criteria shall not abrogate or annul any binding agreements, Development Improvement Agreements, easements, permits, utility reports or construction drawings accepted by the City prior to the effective date of these Criteria. 1.8 Relationship to Other Standards 1.8.1 State Public Wastewater System Code and Rules Public wastewater systems in the State of Utah are governed by the State of Utah Code, Annotated and the Utah Administrative Code. These codes and rules apply to policy, planning, criteria and construction of public water facilities and prevail if a conflict exists within the Criteria. 1.8.2 State Construction Code The State of Utah Construction codes and rules, with amendments, are incorporated by reference. These codes and rules apply to policy, planning, criteria and construction of public wastewater facilities and prevail if a conflict exists within the Criteria. 1.9 Variances from these Criteria Modifications to these Criteria shall require a formal variance request. Variances from the provisions of these Criteria may be considered on a case -by -case basis for specific applications only, and shall not establish a precedent for any other project or future development. 1.10 Adoption of the Utah Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications The latest Utah APWA Manual of Standard Plans and Manual of Standard Specifications and drawings are hereby adopted as the City of Moab Standard Details and Standard Specifications for wastewater system improvements. Variance from these standards must be approved by the City. In the event that multiple standards or sections of the standard apply, the City will determine the applicable standard. 1.11 Gray Water Irrigation Systems Gray water irrigation systems within the City of Moab are regulated by the Southeastern Utah Health Department (Health Department). Application for graywater systems must be made to the Health Department. Graywater systems must comply with Health Department requirements and the Utah Administrative Code {R317-401 U.A.C.}. 3 Page 124 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions 1.12 Special Wastes and Industrial Pre -Treatment The City shall be notified of any potential waste streams that are different than typical residential wastes in quantity or characteristics. Specifically, the following pollutants are prohibited: • Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the City wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) or collection system, including, but not limited to, waste streams with a closed cup flashpoint of less than 140°F (60°C); • Pollutants which will cause corrosive structural damage to the WWTP or collection system. Discharges with a pH lower than 5.0 or greater than 10 are prohibited; • Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which will cause obstruction to the flow in the system resulting in interference; • Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (BOD, etc.) released in a discharge at such volume or strength as to cause interference in the WWTP or collection system; • Heat in amounts, which will inhibit biological activity in the WWTP, resulting in interference, but in no case, heat in such quantities that the influent to the sewage treatment works exceeds 104°F (40°C); • Petroleum oil, nonbiodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause interference or pass through; • Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapor, or fumes within the WWTP or collection system in a quantity that may cause health or safety problems; • Any trucked or hauled pollutants, except at discharge points designated by the WWP; or • Any substance that contains concentrations of constituents greater than those specified in Table 1-2. TABLE 1-2 LIMITS TO WASTEWATER DISCHARGE CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATION (mg/L) Total solids (TS) 600 Volatile solids 300 Total suspended solids (TSS) 250 Volatile suspended solids 200 5-day Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) 200 Chemical oxygen demand (COD) 500 Total Nitrogen (TN) 60 Ammonia (NH4) 10 Total Phosphorus (TP) 10 4 Page 125 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions These special wastes may require pre-treatment, which includes providing any necessary treatment technology, equipment, disposal, and expert operators necessary for proper treatment. This proper treatment includes all resources necessary such that the waste stream delivered to the City of Moab wastewater collection and treatment facilities meets the above criteria and is acceptable to the City. The waste stream may not cause or facilitate violation of the facility's Utah Division of Water Quality discharge permit, volume and flowrate capacities and processing limitations. The developer/owner must meet with the City prior to connection to determine the specific requirements for special wastes. 1.13 Acronyms As used in this Manual, the following acronyms shall apply: ANSI APWA ASTM BOP CD and CDs DIA HP IPC IRC LP Max Min MDD MG MGD NAVD O&M OSHA PDF PE PSI PVC SCADA TOP OWTS American National Standards Institute American Public Works Association American Society for Testing and Materials Bottom of Pipe Construction Drawing(s) Development Improvement Agreement High Point International Plumbing Code International Residential Code Low Point Maximum Minimum Maximum Day Demand Million Gallons Million Gallons per Day North American Vertical Datum Operation and Maintenance Occupational Safety and Health Administration Peak Design Flow or Portable Document Format Professional Engineer Pounds per Square Inch Polyvinyl Chloride Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Top of Pipe On -Site Wastewater Treatment System 5 Page 126 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions 1.14 Definitions of Terms CITY shall mean the City of Moab, Utah. CITY COUNCIL means the Moab City Council. CITY ENGINEER shall mean the City of Moab Engineer or other authorized representative of the Engineering Department. CODE or MUNICIPAL CODE shall mean the City of Moab Municipal Code, as amended. CONSTRUCTION DRAWING(S) (CD or CDs) shall mean Construction Drawings prepared by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Utah for the Developer and approved by the City depicting Public and/or Private Improvements to be constructed for the Project. CRITERIA or DESIGN CRITERIA shall mean the design criteria and requirements contained herein for wastewater facilities to be constructed in the City. DETAILS or STANDARD DETAILS shall mean details issued by City to be used or referenced in the Construction Drawings. DEVELOPER shall mean the party or parties desiring to construct Public and/or Private Improvements within City rights -of -way or easements, securing all required approvals and permits from the City and other applicable entities, and assuming full and complete responsibility for the Project. DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (DIA) shall mean a formal agreement between a Developer and the City that addresses development conditions and obligations. EASEMENT shall mean the right of the City to use lands owned by a another party for the purposes of maintenance, access, utilities, drainage or other use, as specified in an agreement between the City and the other party. ENGINEER shall mean the Professional Engineer retained by the Developer responsible for the creation and submission of utility reports and construction drawings to the City for approval for the purpose of one-time construction of facilities. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT shall mean the City of Moab Engineering Department. GRAY WATER shall mean untreated wastewater that has not been in contact with toilet water that is applied below the ground surface for irrigation. 6 Page 127 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions LIFT STATION shall mean a sewage pumping station. MUNICIPAL CODE — See CODE. OWNER shall mean the person(s) in title to any portion of the Property, according to the records of the Grand County Clerk and Recorder. The use of the singular "Owner" shall refer to all Owners of the Property. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those improvements not identified as Public Improvements, and which are not generally installed within the City rights -of -way, easements, or other City -owned lands. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER shall mean an individual currently registered with the Utah Division of Professional and Occupational Licensing as a professional engineer. PROJECT shall mean the Public or Private Improvements as designated in the approved Construction Drawings to be constructed in conformance with these Design Criteria. The Project is inclusive of any and all Public or Private Improvement Projects for or within the City, whether Development Projects, Private Utility Projects, Capital Improvement Projects or other types of proj ects. PROPERTY shall mean the real property located in the City of Moab. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those public facilities including, but not limited to, pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian/bike/equestrian paths, storm drain facilities with related appurtenances, culverts, channels, bridges, water distribution, transmission and storage facilities with related appurtenances, wastewater collection facilities with related appurtenances, water purification facilities, pavement markings/signage/striping, traffic signals and related appurtenances, and those processes integral to construction of other Public Improvements listed herein, which upon their completion are to be dedicated to the City for operation and maintenance by the City and which are installed within the City rights -of -way, easements, or other City -owned lands. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR shall mean the City of Moab Public Works Director REGULATIONS shall mean the Charter, ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the City, including the Code, and other provisions of all zoning, subdivision and building codes or any other applicable design criteria adopted by the City, as the same may be amended periodically and applied uniformly throughout the City. 7 Page 128 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions SHALL shall mean a mandatory requirement or condition, as approved by the City. STANDARD DETAILS — See DETAILS. VARIANCE REQUEST shall mean a formal request with adequate documentation and justification for a variance from the standards, provisions, policies or submittal requirements set forth in these Design Criteria that meets the requirements in Section 1.9 of these Design Criteria. WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN shall mean the City of Moab Wastewater Master Plan. 8 Page 129 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 2. Wastewater Collection System Policies 2.1 Introduction Provisions for adequate service, wastewater collection and treatment are necessary to preserve and promote the general health, welfare, and economic well-being of the residents of the City of Moab. The City of Moab must provide coordination, review, and master planning of the system in order that the integration of each component of the system meets the intent and purpose of the system as a whole. The development of the City's wastewater system is governed by the policies provided below, as facilitated through the implementation of the Criteria contained herein. 2.2 Planning Policy All developments on land within the City that are served by the City's public wastewater system shall provide planning and design for wastewater loadings, including peaking factors. Reports and plans shall be submitted for all new development and redevelopment within the City jurisdiction. These reports shall conform to the requirements set forth herein and the provisions otherwise stipulated by the City during the development process. Redevelopment shall be defined as any land disturbance or reconstruction that results in a reconfiguration of existing wastewater system facilities or an increase in demands. During the initial planning stages of the development, a pre -application meeting shall be coordinated with the City. One purpose of this meeting is to assist the City and the developer to determine the level of wastewater service that is available and needed by the developer. 2.3 Design Policy Wastewater system planning and design within the City shall adhere to the Criteria contained herein, the administrative rules promulgated by the Utah Division of Water Quality, the Utah Division of Water Rights (as related to return flows) and acceptance procedures of the City. Prohibited facilities and connections shall be as described in these Criteria. 2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy The construction of improvements for and within the City shall conform to the City's construction permit, standard details and approved plans, and shall adhere to all City, County, State, and Federal regulations applicable to the work. This shall include the acquisition of all necessary permits, which may include, but not be limited to, stream alteration permits, discharge permits, road cut permits, flood plain related permits and letters (including FEMA review and approval when applicable), Utah Division of Water Quality approvals, traffic control permits and all other required permits and approvals. At the completion of construction, all permits and service agreements with power companies and any other private utilities shall be transferred into the Developer's name, and shall under no circumstances be transferred to, or held in the name of 9 Page 130 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 2. Wastewater Collection System Policies the City, unless the City is the customer. Any work proposed to take place within existing City of Moab streets must be reviewed and approved by the City. The type of crossing allowed, traffic control, street repair specifications, etc. shall be as determined by the City. Prior to placing the facilities into service and initial acceptance by the City, all construction related provisions required by the City shall be satisfied, including startup procedures, inspections and testing of the facilities, and receipt of O&M Manuals and Record Drawings. Additionally, all requirements and responsibilities shall be complied with in association with the warranty period as set forth in the City's Regulations (not to be less than 1 year). 2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy The delineation between City -owned and privately owned portions of the system and the associated maintenance responsibilities for each, shall be as set forth in the latest editions of the Municipal Code and Standard Details. Upon execution of Final Acceptance, sanitary sewers, force mains, lift stations, and all appurtenant City -owned facilities, shall become the sole property of the City, and full legal and equitable title thereto shall be vested in the City free and clear of any liens, claims or rights of any third party in or to the Public Improvements. 2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy The design of all wastewater system facilities within the City must provide for access and long- term operation and maintenance of the facilities by the City. Operation and Maintenance manuals associated with all components to be installed as part of the wastewater system shall be provided to the City with the Record Drawings, unless otherwise specifically waived by the City. Utility easements or tracts and access easements shall be provided for all wastewater system facilities outside of public right-of-way as set forth in these Criteria, or as otherwise required by the City, and shall be adequate for the operation, maintenance and replacement of the facilities. 2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy Public safety and the protection of City staff shall be an essential objective when planning, designing, constructing, operating and maintaining the City's wastewater collection system facilities. All such facilities shall be designed with careful consideration of the potential hazards associated with the use and long-term operation and maintenance of the facility. The design phase of all projects shall evaluate the health and safety risks associated with the facilities, and shall include appropriate design features to minimize these risks and to adequately protect the general public and City personnel from the hazards. Equipment for confined space entry in accordance with OSHA and other applicable regulatory agency requirements shall be provided at all City of Moab facilities, as required. Hatches with fall prevention covers, intermediate 10 Page 131 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 2. Wastewater Collection System Policies platforms, handrails, safety lighting, ventilation etc. shall be as required by the City, or any applicable code. 2.8 Duty of the Engineer Preparing Development Documents These standards establish criteria and policies for the design and subsequent construction of the City's public wastewater system. These standards are not intended to substitute for engineering knowledge, judgement or experience. It is the responsibility of the design (development) Engineer to understand and apply sound engineering principals related to public wastewater systems to the planning, design and construction of wastewater system improvements. It is also the responsibility of the Engineer to understand all federal, state and local regulations related to the public wastewater system. These criteria should be reviewed by the Engineer, who shall evaluate their applicability. If the Engineer identifies criteria that are inapplicable or inappropriate in a specific location or specific situation, the engineer shall bring the issue to the attention of the City. 11 Page 132 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements 3.1 Introduction The requirements presented in this chapter shall be used to aid the Engineer or Applicant in the preparation of utility reports, modeling evaluations, and Construction Drawings for wastewater system facilities. This Chapter applies primarily to submittal requirements for wastewater collection systems and the associated Criteria provided in Chapter 4. The requirements presented herein are the minimum necessary, and will be used to evaluate the adequacy of all submittals made to the City. 3.2 Review Process 3.2.1 Pre -Application Consultation A pre -application consultation with the City of Moab Planning Department is strongly encouraged for any type of development or redevelopment. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss general information about the project, pertinent aspects of the Criteria, the required scope of the utility reports, and any special procedures, analyses, and submittal requirements that may be applicable. 3.2.2 Wastewater Utility Report Requirements Preliminary and final wastewater utility reports shall be provided to the City of Moab. The purpose of the preliminary wastewater utility report is to identify existing wastewater infrastructure, provide preliminary estimates of wastewater loading, provide an initial plan for wastewater infrastructure and determine the feasibility of providing wastewater service to the development via the public wastewater collection system. The purpose of the final wastewater utility report, which is to be submitted with the final construction plans, is to identify the final wastewater infrastructure plan. 3.2.2.1 Format All required reports shall be prepared on 81/2" x 11" paper (except that maps and figures shall generally be 11" x 17" or larger) and be bound, and shall follow the format contained in the report checklists. Supporting drawings, figures, and tables shall be bound into the reports or included in an attached pocket. Reports shall include a narrative presenting the project for review in accordance with the information presented in these Criteria, and the requirements established by the City for the appropriate submittal. Paper and electronic (PDF) copies of the report shall be provided. Electronic files of computer models and GIS files shall be provided if requested by the City. 3.2.2.2 Stand -Alone Document The wastewater utility reports shall be stand-alone documents. When references are made or assumptions are based on previously submitted reports, the reports must include the appropriate 12 Page 133 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements excerpts, pages, tables, and maps containing the referenced information. Assumptions made in previous reports must be verified and substantiated in subsequent reports. Reports shall be legible. 3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy Any report with incomplete or missing information shall result in the report being returned without review. The City reserves the right to require additional information beyond that specifically required in these Criteria. 3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies The review and approval of the project by State, Federal, and local agencies other than the City, shall be the responsibility of the Developer. The Developer shall be required to address all referral agency comments, and to have such comments incorporated into the applicable utility report and plans submitted to the City. 3.3 Acceptance 3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction The final wastewater utility report shall conform to the construction documents used to bid the project, and shall be approved by the City prior to the construction of any wastewater system improvements. 3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report The approval of the final wastewater utility report shall expire simultaneously with the expiration of the approval of the project unless extended in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. At the time the approval of the final utility report expires, the report shall be deemed invalid and a resubmittal will be required. In order to be re -approved, it must be demonstrated that the concepts, designs, and calculations presented in the report are consistent with the City's current Criteria. 3.4 Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report The Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report shall review and discuss the existing wastewater system infrastructure and the wastewater needs of the development. The report shall also identify the existing infrastructure needed to support the development. The City Engineering Department and Public Works Department will coordinate with the developer to provide the wastewater system data needed as an input to the Engineer's design. 13 Page 134 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report that shall be submitted: I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. Name of Project, including legal name of development. B. Address. C. Owner. D. Developer. E. Engineer. F. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable. II. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION A. Site Location. 1. Site Vicinity Map. 2. Township, Range, Section, and % Section. 3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development. 4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments. B. Description of Property and Land Use. 1. Total area in acres. 2. Total number of equivalent residential units (ERUs) proposed for the development at build -out with a breakdown of units by type projected by phase (if applicable) calculated by utilizing the Utah Administrative Code Minimum Sizing Requirements {R317 U.A.C.}. 3. Area (acres) and land use for all parcels to be served within the development boundaries. 4. Major and minor drainages and floodplains, including FEMA desigations. 5. Existing irrigation canals or ditches. 6. Significant geologic features and topography. 7. Existing On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS). 8. Existing water wells. 9. Easements/tracts may not be known initially; however, provide a statement that easements or tracts necessary for utilities will be provided at time of preliminary site plan, in accordance with City standards regarding location and size of easements and tracts. 14 Page 135 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements III. EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM A. Existing Collection System. Discuss the existing sanitary sewers, interceptors, lift stations, and force mains in the vicinity of the development, including sizes and locations that will serve the proposed development. IV. ESTIMATED PROPOSED LOADINGS A. Average Day Loadings. Estimated hydraulic and BOD5 loadings must be provided for all phases of development. If wastewater is expected to be typical for residential wastewater, BOD5 may be assumed to be typical. If typical, this assumption shall be stated in the report. B. Peak Loadings. Estimated peaking factors for hydraulic loadings shall be provided. C. Special Waste Characteristics (if different from typical residential wastewater). A detailed listing of special wastewater constituents shall be provided, along with a detailed description of needed treatment processes. A listing of pre-treatment processes provided by the project Owner shall be discussed in detail. V. PROPOSED WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM A. Proposed Collection System. Provide a general overview of the anticipated collection system layout, and discuss any extensions from the site to the existing wastewater system that are necessary to serve the development. The locations and types of pipes, manholes, clean -outs, and other facilities shall be provided. B. Proposed Wastewater Facilities. Discuss any anticipated lift stations, force mains, pretreatment facilities, etc., that will likely be required to adequately serve the development. 15 Page 136 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements VI. REFERENCES Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the report. 3.4.1 Wastewater System Modeling The City maintains a wastewater system model. Once the preliminary wastewater system report is received and found to be adequate, the City will determine whether wastewater system modeling is required. If the modeling is required, the City will determine the level of modeling needed for the development and will estimate the cost of modeling. The developer will be responsible for the cost of wastewater system modeling. 3.5. City Designation of Connection Points If the City of Moab determines that the Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report meets the requirements set forth in these Criteria, the City will provide wastewater service at designated tie-in points. 3.6. Geotechnical Investigation and Report A geotechnical investigation and report is required to provide a basis for wastewater collection system design. The investigation must include boreholes or excavations to a depth at least 2-feet deeper than the bottom of the anticipated trench excavation. Samples shall be collected and analyzed at a geotechnical laboratory to determine soil classification, moisture contents, dry density, strength, water level (if detected) and corrosion potential. The investigation shall identify expansive and collapsible soils. The report shall include recommendations for foundations backfill, utility and trench construction, and compaction. The report shall include a discussion of the suitability of the on -site soils for use for the intended purposes. 3.7 Final Wastewater Utility Report The Final Wastewater Utility Report shall describe final wastewater infrastructure, including final modeling and calculations. The Final Wastewater Utility Report shall be consistent with final construction drawings. The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Final Wastewater Utility Report that shall be submitted with the Construction Documents: 16 Page 137 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements I. TITLE SHEET A. Name of Project, including legal name of Development. B. Address. C. Owner. D. Developer. E. Engineer. F. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable. II. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION A. Site Location. 1. Site Vicinity Map 2. Township, Range, Section, and 1/4 Section. 3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development. 4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments. B. Description of Property and Land Use. 1. Total area in acres. 2. Discussion of project phasing, if applicable. 3. Total number of ERUs proposed for the development at build -out with a breakdown of units by type projected by phase (if applicable). 4. Area (acres), land use for all parcels to be served within the development boundaries (initial and future phases, if applicable) and number of lots. 5. Sizes of schools, commercial and industrial buildings (initial and future phases, if applicable). 6. Major and minor drainages and floodplains, including FEMA designations. 7. Existing irrigation canals or ditches. 8. Significant geologic features and topography. 9. Existing On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS). 10. Existing water wells. III. CALCULATED FLOWS A. Average Day Loadings. Estimated hydraulic and BOD5 loadings must be provided for all phases of development. If wastewater is expected to be typical for residential wastewater, BOD5 may be assumed to be typical. This shall be stated in the report. 17 Page 138 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements B. Peak Loadings. Estimated peaking factors for hydraulic loadings shall be provided. C. Special Waste Characteristics (if different from typical residential wastewater). A detailed listing of special wastewater constituents shall be provided, along with a detailed description of needed treatment processes. A listing of pre-treatment processes provided by the project Owner shall be discussed in detail. IV. EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM A. Existing Collection System. Discuss the existing sanitary sewers, interceptors, lift stations, and force mains in the vicinity of the development, including sizes and locations that will need to be extended to serve the proposed development. V. PROPOSED WASTEWATER SYSTEM A. Proposed Collection System. Provide a description of all proposed wastewater facilities and a general overview of the anticipated collection system layout, including the proposed line sizes. Describe the tie-ins to the existing wastewater system and the sizes and lengths of any extensions necessary to serve the development. B. Proposed Wastewater Facilities. Discuss any lift stations, force mains, pretreatment facilities, etc., that will likely be required to adequately serve the development. C. Land Dedication Requirements. Generally describe any portions of the proposed wastewater system that are not planned to be located in public right-of-way, and will therefore require the dedication of tracts or utility easements to the City. 18 Page 139 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements VI. POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT (DIA) ITEMS Discuss any potential DIA items such as needed off -site improvements, improvements necessary for a project or project phase to be independently sustainable, etc. VII. POTENTIAL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS Generally discuss all foreseeable Federal, State, County, and Local permitting requirements associated with the project. XI. REFERENCES Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the report. 3.7.1 Wastewater System Modeling The City maintains a wastewater system model. It is anticipated that wastewater system modeling will be performed once the Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report is submitted. The results of the City's wastewater modeling should be included in the Final Wastewater Utility Report. The City of Moab should be notified of any changes. The modeling will be used by the City as needed. The developer will be responsible for the cost of wastewater system modeling. 3.7.2 Disclaimer The City is not responsible or liable for assumptions made by the Developer regarding utility information associated with the proposed development. 3.8 Construction Drawings 3.8.1 Wastewater System Improvements Wastewater system improvements within public rights -of -way or utility easements are required to be designed, approved, and constructed in accordance with the City's Regulations, subdivision requirements of the Municipal Code, the City's Design Criteria and Standard Details, sound engineering principles, and the conditions of any variances obtained from the City. 3.8.2 Indemnification Statement Construction Drawings are reviewed by the City of Moab for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the City of Moab for accuracy and correctness of calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed for any reason as acceptance of financial 19 Page 140 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements responsibility by the City for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. 3.8.3 Construction Drawing Requirements In general, construction drawings shall include plan and profile drawings that convey the horizontal and vertical alignment of the improvements, and all other pertinent plans, sections and detailing necessary to construct the proposed facilities. All construction drawings submitted to the City for review, comment, and approval of wastewater system improvements shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Utah. Said Professional Engineer shall be responsible for the information contained on the construction drawings, which shall bear the Professional Engineer's seal prior to final approval for construction. The Developer, Contractor and Engineer associated with the construction drawings shall be responsible for the adequacy and satisfactory performance of the designs and the installation of all items therein, and any failure or unsatisfactory performance of the system, so constructed, shall not be a cause for action against the City. Approval of the construction drawings by the City signifies only that the construction drawings meet the minimum stipulations of these design criteria and City requirements based upon the information provided to the City by the Engineer and/or Developer, and makes no finding, representation, or warranty that the system and associated components will perform satisfactorily. 3.8.3.1 Wastewater Utility Construction Drawings In addition to the general formatting and information to be included on all sheets of a construction drawing (e.g., north arrow, scale, project boundaries, lot lines, rights -of -way, tracts, approval blocks, etc.), the following information shall be included on the final Wastewater Utility Plans. 1. Legend: Each sheet shall show the symbols pertaining to the sheet. 2. Vertical Datum: All elevations used for the planning, design and construction of facilities shall be on the NAVD88 Datum. No conversion equation is allowed. 3. Horizontal Benchmark and Coordinates: The horizontal benchmark shall be specified. In order to facilitate the City's GIS mapping efforts, all construction drawings shall be placed in the State Plane NAD83, Utah Central Zone Coordinate System and include the coordinates of a known property corner on or adjacent to the site. 4. Plan views shall be oriented so that north is up on the sheet or to the right. 5. Overall Wastewater System Plan: In plan view, provide all information and dimensions for horizontal layout of proposed sanitary sewer and force mains including but not limited to manholes, wye connections, sanitary sewer service lines, cleanouts, lift stations, and any other appurtenances that are part of the wastewater collection system. 20 Page 141 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements Coordinates shall be provided for the locations of manholes, lift stations and other key components. 6. Plan views shall show the locations and sizes of all existing and proposed utility lines and appurtenances (water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, gas, electric, telephone, cable, fiber optic, etc.) on and adjacent to the site. Plan views shall show the location of all existing water wells and On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) on and adjacent to the site. 7. Plan views shall show existing sanitary sewer and force mains with sizes; manholes; sanitary sewer service taps and lines; clean -outs; lift stations; and any other appurtenances that are part of the wastewater collection system on and adjacent to the site. 8. Plan views shall show existing and proposed curb, gutter, and sidewalks; and all existing and proposed obstructions, such as vaults, catch basins, traffic islands, street lights, walls or other permanent structures on and adjacent to the site. 9. Plan views and profiles shall show the tie-ins to the existing wastewater collection system, including sizes of existing sewers. In addition, the nearest manholes on existing sewers shall be shown or, at a minimum, the distance to these manholes shall be included on the CDs. 10. Plan views and profiles shall show all needed off -site improvements, extensions of service or upgrades to the City's wastewater collection system. 11. Plan views shall show and label as to type and width, all existing and proposed easements that are on and adjacent to the site. Recordation information shall be included for all existing easements. 12. Profile views are required for all sanitary sewers and force mains and must show proposed streets profiles and existing ground surface profiles. The following information shall be included: a. All high points (HP) and low points (LP) along the sanitary sewer and force mains shall be identified; b. Where required by these Criteria, combination air release and air/vacuum valves and drain valves shall be shown on force mains, with the TOP elevations provided. c. All utility crossings shall be identified. 13. Profile views or plan views: Adequate pipe elevation information is required for all utility crossings of water, sanitary sewer, force main, stormwater, gas, electric lines, etc. The following information shall be included: a. Types and sizes of the utility lines at the crossing and the location of the crossing. b. If any pipes at a crossing are to be encased, the coordinates at each end of the encasement, and the type and thickness of the encasements shall be specified. In addition, all utility crossing shall include either: 21 Page 142 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Wastewater Collection System Submittal Requirements (1) A reference to the sheet where the crossing information is shown; or (2) TOP and BOP elevations and vertical clearance at the crossing with a callout of "(Min. = 1.5')" wherever the clearance is 2 feet or less. 14. Wastewater System Details: All pertinent details related to wastewater system improvements, such as manholes, outside drop manholes, sanitary sewer service line connections, sanitary sewer clean -outs, proposed utility crossings, including concrete blankets, trenching, etc., shall be shown on detail sheets on the construction drawings. References to the Utah APWA plans may be provided. In this case, the detail drawings don't need to be provided in the plan set. 3.9 Record Drawings All wastewater system improvements constructed within public rights -of -way and dedicated easements must be formally accepted by the City. 22 Page 143 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria 4.1 Design Criteria - Reference Design Documents Standards and reference publications pertinent to the design of wastewater facilities within the City are listed below. Unless otherwise specified, the latest editions shall apply. • Utah State Code, Annotated • Utah Administrative Code • Utah American Public Works Association (Utah APWA) • All applicable International Codes recognized by the City including, but not limited to, the International Building Code (IBC), the International Plumbing Code (IPC), the International Fire Code (IFC), the International Residential Code (IRC), and the International Mechanical Code (IMC) • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) • Utah Depar tment of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) • City of Moab Municipal Code • City of Moab Wastewater Master Plan • Gravity Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction (Current Version). Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 60. American Society of Civil Engineers/Water Pollution Control Federation. 4.2 Prohibited Installations The following installations are prohibited unless otherwise approved by the City. Items listed below reference sections contained in these Criteria that provide the minimum design requirements to be addressed should a variance be pursued. • On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) • Private Ejector Pumps and Private Lift stations, unless approved by the City • Inverted Wastewater Siphons • Manholes and sewer lines over 20 feet deep • Elevated Wastewater Pipelines 4.3 Unlawful Connections It shall be unlawful to discharge roof drainage, foundation drainage, sump pumps, surface drainage, storm water, solid wastes, or any other illicit discharges to the wastewater collection system.. 23 Page 144 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria 4.4 Minimum Wastewater System Design Criteria This section presents the minimum technical criteria for the analysis and design of wastewater systems within the boundaries of the City of Moab and other areas served by the City, including collection sewers, sanitary sewer service lines, and the applicable appurtenances associated with these installations. Any special criteria beyond those contained herein, and as determined necessary by the City, shall be discussed at the pre -application consultation (or as the issue arises). 4.4.1 Design Flows Average daily loadings, peaking factors and average annual loadings shall be based on the criteria included in the current Utah Administrative Code and based upon information included in the Wastewater Master Plan. This information is currently located at {R317-3 U.A.C.}. The City may adjust the loading values based on the evaluation of actual use data, a current master plan or other conditions determined to affect the safety and welfare of the public. 4.4.2 Hydraulic Design Wastewater systems shall be designed to provide a minimum velocity of 2.0 feet per second at the peak design flow. In situations where the minimum velocity of 2.0 feet per second cannot be met, an explanation and justification shall be included in the Final Wastewater Utility Report. The maximum velocity shall not exceed 10 feet per second. Drop manholes shall be provided to break steep slopes to limit the velocities in conformance with this criterion. Where drop manholes are impractical for velocity reduction, the sewer must be approved by variance and shall be of PVC or other abrasion resistant material approved by the City. Where actual flow will be much below normal for several years, the minimum velocity shall be achieved by suitable grades at the initial design flow rate. Care shall be taken to design invert elevations at manholes in such a manner that the energy gradient is consistently falling in the direction of the flow. Sanitary sewers shall be sized to convey the peak design flow in accordance with the following table: Pipe Diameter (inches) Maximum Depth of Flow/Pipe Diameter < 15 0.5 >15 0.75 Computation of velocity of flow shall be based on a coefficient of roughness "n" in the Manning formula as follows: n = 0.013 (min). 24 Page 145 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria At all junctions where a smaller diameter main discharges in to a larger one, the crowns (obverts) of the two pipes shall have matching elevations. No surcharging of sanitary sewer lines is allowed. 4.4.3 Pipe Sizes and Grades Sanitary sewer shall be a minimum of 8 inches in diameter. Service lines shall be a minimum of 4 inches in diameter. The minimum sewer slopes shall comply with the slopes included in Table R317-3-2.3(D)(4) of the Utah Administrative Code. 4.4.4 Selection of Pipe Material Gravity sewers in the City collection system shall be constructed of PVC, or fiber -glass reinforced polymer mortar, unless special conditions require another material. Force mains shall be PVC or HDPE. Other pipe materials must be approved by the City prior to use. If concrete is to be used, the collection system must be evaluated for sulfide corrosion risk and corrosion mitigation measures must be implemented as needed. Sewers at stream crossings or crossings with water lines shall be ductile iron in accordance with {R317 U.A.C.{. Materials for building sewers (between structures and the City collection main) shall be in accordance with plumbing code. 4.4.5 General Wastewater System Layout Criteria 4.4.5.1 Location All sanitary sewers and appurtenances shall be installed in dedicated rights -of -way or dedicated utility easements. Sewers or manholes shall not be installed parallel to, and directly below, any concrete such as sidewalks, trails, curbs, or gutters. In general, sanitary sewers shall be located in public streets near the center of the south or west lane. Sanitary sewers and manholes shall not be located in vehicle wheel paths. A sewer shall not be closer than 5 feet to a gutter. Sanitary sewer lines and manholes shall not be located within detention pond areas. Where it is necessary to locate a sanitary sewer main along back lot lines, the alignment shall be specifically approved by the City. Manholes installed along lot lines shall be provided locking - type covers. 4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout Sewers shall be laid with a minimum separation of 10 feet horizontally, edge -to -edge, from all water lines. Sewers shall have a minimum separation of 10 feet horizontally, centerline -to - centerline, from all other existing or proposed utilities wherever possible. The City of Moab must specifically approve any variance from these requirements in the event that it has been determined that it is impossible to maintain the specified horizontal separation distances. 25 Page 146 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Sewers adjacent to developments shall be designed to extend along the entire frontage of the property to be served, from property line to property line, with termination in a manhole. This provides for wastewater service for adjacent Developers or Builders in the future. Within developments, sanitary sewers shall be extended at least ten feet horizontally uphill from the lowest lot corner of the uppermost lot, and shall terminate in a manhole. 4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout Sanitary sewers shall have a minimum cover of 5 feet to finished ground surface, and a maximum cover of 20 feet unless otherwise approved by variance. Sanitary sewers shall be deep enough to collect wastewater from all basements by gravity flow. When less than 9 feet of elevation difference exists between the finished lot grade at the building line and the top of the sanitary sewer main, such conditions shall be clearly addressed in the required Utility Reports, with notes provided on the record drawings indicating which lots are served by a "shallow sanitary sewer." Appropriate elevation information shall be provided on the record drawings for all such mains. For sewers that receive or will receive flow from offsite, the minimum depth to the sewer is 9 feet, unless otherwise approved by the City. 4.4.5.4 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing a Water Main When it is necessary for sewers to cross public water system pipes, the crossings shall be in accordance with the State of Utah requirements. These requirements are located at {R309-550-7 U.A.C.} and {R317-3-2.9(B)(1) U.A.C}. 4.4.5.5 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing of a Storm Drain When sanitary sewers or force mains cross a storm drain, regardless of vertical clearance and which pipe crosses over the other, each joint of the storm sewer within the trench width of the crossing shall be encased in a concrete collar at least 6 inches thick and extending at least 6 inches each side of each joint. 4.4.5.6 Limits on Minimum Vertical Clearance Under no circumstances shall the minimum vertical clearance between any two crossing utilities be less than 12 inches unless approved by the City. 4.4.6 Bored Crossings When a sewer passes under a State roadway, an arterial or collector roadway as defined by the City, railroad, drainage or irrigation ditch, the sewer shall be located within bored steel casing pipe, unless otherwise allowed to be open cut by the jurisdictional entity being crossed. The carrier pipe shall be supported by casing spacers. The casing shall be sealed around the sewer at the casing ends. The casing shall have a minimum of 5 feet of cover. The casing pipe shall extend the entire width of the right-of-way or easement of the crossing structure, or as directed by the City or other jurisdictional entity. 26 Page 147 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Crossing at ditches shall include cutoff walls at each side of the crossing, either as required by the jurisdictional entity, or as analyzed and designed by the Engineer at the direction of the Engineering Department. Casing pipe shall be smooth -walled, non -coated pipe of welded steel construction conforming to ANSUAWWA C200, and shall be seamless or straight seam steel pipe with minimum yield strength of 35,000 psi. The casing pipe shall be new material and have a minimum wall thickness as follows unless specified otherwise. Carrier Pipe Nominal Diameter Min. Casing Pipe O.D. Min. Wall Thickness* 4" 12" 0.250" 6" 14" 0.3125" 8" 16" 0.3125" 12" 20" 0.3750" *The boring contractor shall determine and provide a greater wall thickness if needed. Other pipe sizes shall be designed by a professional engineer and submitted to the City of Moab for review. The Engineer shall evaluate the risk of corrosion to the casing based on the corrosively of the surrounding soils, as well as any known risks from nearby stray current, buried electrical lines, nearby impressed current corrosion protection systems or other factors. For each casing installed, the Engineer shall provide a written evaluation as to whether corrosion protection is needed. If needed, the Engineer shall provide a design for corrosion protection. The City preference is for sacrificial anodes systems rather than impressed current systems. The design shall be submitted to the City for review. Long-term maintenance of the system, including anode assessment and replacement, shall be addressed in the evaluation. 4.4.7 Manholes 4.4.7.1 Layout 1. Location: Manholes for access to sewers shall be provided at the following locations: a. All junctions of sanitary sewers. b. All points of change in alignment, grade or pipe size. c. All points of industrial and commercial discharge to facilitate observation and sampling. d. The upstream terminus of the main. e. Cleanouts shall not be allowed to replace manholes on sanitary sewer lines 8 inch and larger. 2. Alignment and Spacing: Sewer manholes shall be aligned and spaced as follows: 27 Page 148 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria a. Sewers shall be installed in a straight alignment, both in line and grade, and not curved between manholes. b. Maximum spacing between manholes shall be 400 feet for lines 15 inches or smaller and 500 feet for lines 18 inches and larger. c. Maximum change in alignment shall not exceed 90 degrees. d. Manhole lids shall not be aligned with vehicle wheel paths, or within 2 feet either direction of the street crown. e. No drop -in style riser or paver rings are allowed. Grade rings beneath the ring and cover are allowable for final grade adjustment with a maximum of 12 inches. 3. Access: Provisions for manhole access shall be as follows: a. Manholes shall not be located in areas that are subject to flooding from surface runoff. If the possibility of surface runoff flooding cannot be avoided, a watertight lid as approved by the City shall be installed to prevent inflow. b. Manholes shall be located in areas that allow direct access by maintenance vehicles when it is not feasible to locate the manhole in a public street. c. Manholes shall not be located in open space access roads, wherever possible. If it is impossible to locate a manhole outside an access road, then the cover shall be at the grade of the access road and a 10' x 10' concrete collar shall be installed around the manhole. All manholes located outside dedicated street right-of-way shall be designed and constructed with a locking -type cover and the manhole ring shall be bolted to the manhole cone and the manhole lid shall be raised in accordance with the City's Standard Detail. Marker shall be installed to mark the location of manholes outside of pavement. d. All manhole lids shall be depressed 1/4" to ''/z" below any adjacent finished street surface. 4.4.7.2 Manhole Sizing Manholes for sanitary sewers up to 18 inches in diameter shall have an inside diameter not less than 4-feet. Manholes for sanitary sewers 18 inches to 36 inches shall have an inside diameter of not less than 5-feet. Manholes for sanitary sewers 36 inches to 54 inches shall have an inside diameter of 6 feet. Manholes for sanitary sewers over 54 inches shall be of special design. If the angle of deflection does not permit use of a 6 foot inside diameter manhole, then a special manhole detail must be submitted for review and approval by the City. There shall be a bench located below the bottom manhole ladder rung. 4.4.7.3 Drop Manholes 1. Drop manholes shall be in accordance with the City's standard details. 28 Page 149 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria :.4.7.4 Main Connections to Existing Manholes No new connection shall be made with existing manholes. When connections are required at the location of an existing manhole, the manhole shall be replaced unless otherwise approved by the City. 4.4.7.5 Sanitary Sewers and Manholes Greater than 20 Feet Where sanitary sewers or manholes cannot be designed at depths less than 20 feet, a variance shall be obtained. 4.4.8 Inverted Wastewater Siphons The design of inverted wastewater siphons, or sag pipes, shall be avoided, unless approved by the City. When inverted siphon construction is deemed necessary and approved by the City, the facility shall have at least two separate barrels with a minimum pipe size of 8 inches, and shall include appurtenances for convenient flushing and maintenance. Inlet and outlet structures shall have adequate clearance for access and maintenance operations, and sufficient head shall be provided and pipes sized to ensure velocities of at least 3.0 feet per second under average flow for both initial and future build -out conditions. The inlet and outlet shall be arranged so that normal flows can be diverted to one barrel, and that either barrel may be removed from service for cleaning or repair. 4.4.9 Fill Areas Where sanitary sewer lines will be constructed in fill areas, all fill materials shall be placed and compacted to final grade prior to the installation of the sanitary sewer line and appurtenances. 4.4.10 Future Connections Manholes shall have pipes stubbed out that are sized to accommodate flows from the upstream basin whenever a future extension of the sanitary sewer main is anticipated. The main line stub - out shall be capped and sealed. 4.4.11 Sanitary Sewer Service Lines All single family residential dwellings, each individual unit in multi -family complexes, and each commercial business and industrial customer shall be served by a separate, independent sanitary sewer service line. 4.4.12.1 Ownership After a building is connected through a service line to the sanitary sewer, the service shall become a part of the building, and the Owner of the premises shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the entire service line (building sewer) between the building and the City sewer, excluding the wye at the connection. Although the service line up to the wye is the responsibility of the Owner, the service lines and associated connections to the main shall be inspected and tested by the City prior to backfill. The inspection of service line stub -outs will take place at the same time inspections are conducted for the installation of the sanitary sewer 29 Page 150 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria main. Inspection of the entire service line will be made when the service line is extended to the building. 4.4.12.2 Layout The Owner shall install a service line stub -out from the sanitary sewer main to each individual lot. Where sidewalks are proposed to be constructed, the stub -out shall be constructed to 15 feet beyond the back of the sidewalk. Where sidewalks will not be constructed, the stub -out shall be constructed a minimum of one foot beyond the property line. The stub -outs shall be plugged and the end marked with a green painted T-post installed in the ground directly above the location of the plugged end. 4.4.12.3 Cleanouts Cleanouts shall be required on wastewater service lines in accordance with the City standard details and in accordance with plumbing code. 4.4.12.4 Structural Requirements A. Under Roads - All structures and pipe placed under public roads shall be of sufficient strength to support, with an adequate factor of safety, the backfill, road surfacing and H- 20 traffic load per AASHTO Standard Specifications. B. Steep Grades - Concrete anchors shall be provided for sewers on slopes of 20% or greater, or where wastewater velocities exceed 15 feet/second. The purpose of the anchors is to secure the sewer against lateral or axial displacement. 4.5 Easements Where sewers cannot be installed in right-of-way, they shall be located within utility easements approved by the City and shall be centered in the easement. All utility easements shall have a minimum width of at least two times the depth to the pipe invert. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet for one utility, 30 feet for two utilities, and 40 feet in width for three utilities. Site -specific circumstances may dictate the need for wider easements. Utility easements and dedicated utility tracts shall be defined by bearings and distances around the perimeter of the easement. Centerline legal descriptions are not acceptable. All utility easements shall be for the exclusive use of the City. No permanent structures, (e.g., retaining walls, trees, light pedestals, sign foundations, power poles, mailboxes, sheds, buildings, etc.), shall be placed in the easement. 30 Page 151 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria 4.6 Sand/Oil and Grease Interceptors Sand/oil and grease interceptors shall be installed on service lines from commercial and industrial properties discharging oil and grease. The owner shall prepare sizing calculations for the interceptor for City review. At the City's option, the City will size the interceptor. The interceptors shall include a sampling port which extends into a manhole or other City approved structure which causes the discharged fluid to drop vertically at least 3-inches so that a samples may be collected. The connection must be in a location accessible by City inspectors so that samples can be collected. 31 Page 152 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 5. Sewage Pump Station (Lift Station) and Force Main Criteria 5.1 Sewage Pump Stations (Lift Stations) and Force Mains 5.1.1 Scope New lift stations are discouraged and shall only be allowed in those locations where there is no feasible way the development can be served by gravity extension of the City's existing wastewater collection system. 5.1.2 Compliance with State of Utah Standards Lift stations shall be designed in accordance with the State of Utah standards, currently located at 1R317-3-3 U.A.C}. Lift stations shall also be design in accordance within the applicable building codes. 5.1.3 City Review and Approval New lift stations must be approved by the City. If approved, the Developer shall submit a utility report with a complete set of design calculations and drawings for review and acceptance by the City. 5.1.4 Flood Protection Lift station structures and the associated electrical and mechanical equipment shall be protected from damage by the 100-year flood, and shall remain fully operational and accessible during such an event. Local, State and Federal regulations pertaining to floodplain shall be satisfactorily accounted for in the design. Grading shall be provided to protect the site by directing surface flows away from the facilities. 5.1.5 Accessibility and Security Lift stations shall be readily accessible by maintenance vehicles during all weather conditions. The facility should be located off the traffic way of streets and alleys. Depending on the nature and location of the facility, security fencing with controlled entry keypads, card -reader access to buildings, security cameras, lockable access hatches, and motion -detection safety lighting may be required. 5.1.6 Grit Where it is necessary to pump wastewater prior to grit removal, the design of the wet well and lift station piping shall receive special consideration to avoid operational problems from the accumulation of grit. 5.1.7 Station Ventilation Adequate ventilation at lift stations shall be provided to mechanically ventilate the dry well, and if screens or mechanical equipment requiring maintenance or inspection are located in the wet well, it shall also be mechanically ventilated. There shall be no inter -connection between the wet well and dry well ventilating systems. In pits over 15 feet deep, multiple inlets and outlets are 32 Page 153 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 5. Sewage Pump Station (Lift Station) and Force Main Criteria required. Switches for the operation of ventilation equipment should be clearly marked and conveniently located. Consideration should be given to automatic controls where operations may be intermittent. Where excessive moisture or low temperatures are a concern, consideration shall be given to installation of heating and/or dehumidification equipment. 5.1.8 Odor Control Unacceptable levels of odors may be produced at lift stations and within force mains due to excessive hydrogen sulfide generation. Odor control systems are required. 5.2 Minimum Lift Station Design Criteria The following design criteria shall be applicable to lift stations: 1. Lift stations must be equipped with instrumentation and SCADA equipment to collect and transmit all relevant data. 2. Backup electrical power provided by a diesel or natural gas generator with an automatic transfer switch in an all-weather enclosure shall be provided to insure that all lift station components function properly for a period of at least one week in the event that the primary power is lost. Electrical power to the lift station site shall be underground. In addition, an emergency overflow basin shall be provided that will accommodate a minimum 12 hours of storage at the peak daily loading rates. The basin shall be designed and configured to allow for complete draining after an overflow event, either by gravity or submersible sump pumps permanently installed in the basin. 3. Lift stations shall include a wet well sized to reduce the cycling of the pumps and the settling of solids from the flows. 4. A corrosion protection system shall be applied to, and shall completely cover all interior surfaces of wet wells, and any in -line vaults or manholes that precede the wet well. The system shall be specifically designed to protect concrete from hydrogen sulfide corrosion. 5. All lift station wet wells shall be considered an explosion hazard. All electrical equipment and wiring installed therein shall be designed for this hazard. 6. Installation of suitable devices for measuring, recording and totalizing sewage influent and effluent flow and power consumption shall be included. 33 Page 154 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 5. Sewage Pump Station (Lift Station) and Force Main Criteria 7. The lift station design shall consider changes in flows over the life of the station and allow for proper operation of the station and force main throughout the intended design life. 8. Where high groundwater conditions are possible, buoyancy of the lift station structures shall be evaluated and protected against flotation. 9. The lift station shall include a wet well bypass -to -overflow basin to allow the wet well to be temporarily removed from service for maintenance. 5.3 Pump Equipment and Protection Pumping equipment shall be specifically designed and rated for wastewater service. For wastewater lift stations with an ultimate rated capacity of 1 MGD or less, the City will consider the use of either self -priming pumps in a wet well, or self -priming pumps in a wet well / dry well configuration. For stations with an ultimate capacity in excess of 1 MGD, only a wet well self - priming configuration with the pump located above the wet well and above ground will be accepted. 5.3.1 Pump Characteristics 1. Pumps shall be specifically designed and rated for wastewater service. 2. The design Engineer shall consider pump efficiency in the design with the intent to maximize pumping efficiency and minimize electrical power demand. 3. Wastewater level measurement equipment shall be provided and shall be connected with the City SCADA system. 3. The lift station shall be provided with multiple pump units programmed to alternate sequentially. Should only two units be provided, equal capacity is required, and each pump train shall be capable of handling the peak flow. Pump redundancy is required so that pumps may be taken out of service for maintenance. 4. The station shall be designed such that the number of motor starts per hour shall not exceed 10, or the number of starts recommended by the motor manufacturer, whichever is less. Duplex pump operation and controllers shall be provided such that the lead and lag pump positions are alternated with each successive motor start. 5. Provisions acceptable to the City shall be made to facilitate the removal of pumps, motors, and other mechanical and electrical equipment. Typically, in wet well / dry well stations, a bridge crane shall be provided for removing pumps. In suction lift stations, slide or overhead rails with hoists for removing pumps shall be provided. In wet well stations, rails shall be provided. 34 Page 155 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 5. Sewage Pump Station (Lift Station) and Force Main Criteria 5.3.2 Pump Protection Pumps handling raw wastewater shall be preceded by approved grinders that are installed to protect the pumps from clogging damage by reducing the particle size of wastewater solids in the flow stream. The grinder shall be located in a lined vault or manhole that precedes the wet well. Grinder pumps may be used in wet well settings for flows less than 1 MGD. 5.4 Overflow Basins Overflow basins for lift stations shall be sized to contain the volume of 12 hours the Average Daily Flow at build -out. The basin shall be designed and configured to allow for complete draining after an overflow event, either by gravity or submersible sump pumps permanently installed in the basin. Basins shall be designed to include a vault or manhole outside the overflow basin to facilitate the complete removal of any liquid that accumulates in the basin, and shall require the installation of a pipe between the basin and vault, with positive slope to the vault. A pump -back or gravity system shall be included in the lift station design to return wastewater to the wet well. 5.5 Force Main Design Criteria 5.5.1 Pipe Materials Force main pipe materials, including restraint devices and fittings, shall be PVC or HDPE. Use of other materials must be approved by the City. 5.5.2 Velocity and Pipe Diameter Sanitary sewer force mains shall be a minimum of 3 inches in diameter. At the design pumping rate (initial and ultimate), the velocity shall be at least 3 feet/second, but not more than 7 feet/second. 5.5.3 Pipe and Design Pressure The force main, joint restraint, thrust blocking, and station piping shall be analyzed and designed to withstand water hammer pressures and associated cyclic reversal stresses that are expected with the cycling of wastewater lift station pumps. Water hammer shall be evaluated for the normal operation of the lift station, as well as for a power outage while the pumps are running. 5.5.4 Shutoff and Check Valves Suitable shutoff and check valves shall be placed on the discharge line of each pump. Check valves shall be suitable for the material being handled and shall be placed on the horizontal portion of discharge piping except for ball checks, which may be placed in the vertical run. Valves shall be capable of withstanding operational design pressures and water hammer. 35 Page 156 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 5. Sewage Pump Station (Lift Station) and Force Main Criteria 5.5.5 Isolation Valves Isolation valves shall be installed at intervals no greater than 1,000 feet along force mains. 5.5.6 Combination Air Release and Air/Vacuum Valves Combination air release and air/vacuum valves shall be located at force main high points, on pump discharge piping as close as possible to the check valve, and between isolation valves. During the design, the Engineer shall consider the economics of air valve installation against the installation of deeper force main piping. The evaluation shall take into account the installation and long-term maintenance costs of the air valves. The valves shall be specifically designed for wastewater service and be sized per the manufacturer's recommendations. Air valves on force mains shall be contained in a vault and vented above ground. A manually controlled isolation valve suitable for wastewater service shall be installed between the force main and air valve. 5.5.7 Drain Valves When required by the City, the Engineer shall include at least one force main dewatering connection at the lift station and additional drains at other major force main low points. The design shall consist of as few low points along the force main as is practically possible. Drains shall generally include a plug valve installed on a tee and drain piping to an existing sanitary sewer manhole, or to a separate manhole that can then be pumped by City personnel. Provisions shall be made to drain the force main back to the wet well. 5.5.8 Cleanouts Cleanouts shall be provided in the force main at distances not to exceed 500 feet. 5.5.9 Termination Force mains shall transition into the gravity wastewater system at a dedicated manhole. The connection of the force main to the manhole shall be made by connecting the force main to a short section of gravity main stubbed out from the manhole. The gravity stub shall be a size that is equal to or larger diameter pipe than the force main, and shall be installed at an elevation that will prevent wastewater from discharging back into the force main when the gravity system is flowing full. The manhole interior shall be coated for protection against hydrogen sulfide corrosion. The manhole and its opening shall be oversized to permit retrieval of cleaning pigs and ancillary equipment. The manhole at the discharge point shall not be an in -line gravity manhole. 5.5.10 Identification Minimum identification requirements for force mains shall consist of tracer wire and warning tape as required for potable water mains, and green marked polywrap for ductile iron pipe. The warning tape shall be labeled, "Caution: Buried Force Main Below". 36 Page 157 of 239 8-4 Old Business MOAB WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL Effective Date: July J14, 2017 Page 158 of 239 8-4 Old Business] Contents 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2Juhsdiction 1 13Purpose 1 1.4Amendments and Revisions 1 1.5 Enforcement Responsibility 3 l.6Review and Acceptance 3 17|nterpretation 3 1.8Relationship toOther Standards 3 1.8.1 State Public Wastewater System Code and Rules 3 1.82 State Construction Code 3 1.9Variances from these Criteria 3 1.10 Adoption of the Utah Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications 3 1.11Special Wastes and Industrial Pre Treatment 3 1.12 Acronyms S 1.13Definitions nfTerms 6 2.1|ntruduction B 2.2 Planning Policy 9 23Design Policy 9 2.4Construction ofPublic Improvements Policy 9 2.SOwnership ofPublic Improvements Policy 10 2.6Operations and Maintenance Policy 10 27 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy 10 2.8Duty ofthe Engineer Preparing Development Documents 11 3.1 Introduction 12 3.2Review Process 12 3.2.1 Pro Application Consultation 12 322Wastewater Utility Report Requirements 12 3]2.1Fnrmat 12 ].2.IZStand-Alone Document 12 Page 159 of 239 8-4 Old Business ].2.23Submittal Adequacy 13 3.2.3 Review byReferral Agencies 13 3.3 Acceptance 13 3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction 13 3.32Approvu| Limitation for Final Utility Report 13 3.4Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report 13 3.4.1Wastewater System Modeling 16 3.5. City Designation of Connection Points 16 3.6Final Wastewater Utility Report 15 3.6.1 Wastewater System Modeling 19 3.6.2 Disclaimer 19 3-.7/Constructinn 9--gg19 3.7.1 Wastewater System Improvements 19 3I2 Indemnification Statement 20 3I3Construction Drawing Requirements 20 ]I].1 Wastewater Utility Construction Drawings 20 3.8Record Drawings 22 4.1Design Criteria Reference Design Documents 23 42 Prohibited Installations 23 43Unlawful Connections 33 4A Minimum Wastewater System Design Criteria 34 4.4.1 Design Flows 34 4.42Hydraulic Design 24 4.1.3Pipe Sizes and Grades 25 444 Selection of Pipe Material 25 4.1.SGeneral Wastewater System Layout Criteria 25 4.4.5.1 Location 25 4.4.52 Horizontal Layout 25 4.1.5.3Vertica| Layout 26 4.4.5.4 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing Water Main 26 4.4.S.5Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing ofoStorm Sewer 26 4.1.5.6 Limits on Minimum Vertical Cl aroncc 26 Page 160 of 239 8-4 Old Business 4.4.6 Bored Crossings 26 4.47K4anho|es 27 4.4I1Layout 27 4.4IZManhole Sizing 28 4.4I3Drop Manholes 29 4.1.7.1 Main Connections to Existing Manholes 29 4.1I5Sanitary Sewers and Manholes Gruatcrthan 2OFeet 29 4.4.8 Inverted Wastewater Siphons 29 4.4.9 Fill Areas 29 4.4.1OFuture Connections 29 4.4.11 Sanitary Sewer Service Lines 29 4.4.I2.1Ovvneohip 29 4.4.12.2Layout ]O 4.4.1I3C|eanouts 30 4.4.12.4Structura| Requirements 30 4.5Easements 30 4.6Sand/Oil and Grease Interceptors 31 5.1Scwogc Pump Stations (Lift Stations) and Force Mains 33 5.1.1 SG**p*—' 33 5.1.2 Compliance with State of Utah Standards 32 S.1.3City Review and Approval 32 5.1.4 Flood Protection 32 S.1.SAccessibility and Security 33 52�6 G it 33 5.1.7Station Ventilation 33 S.1.8Odor Control 33 5.2 Minimum Lift Station Design Criteria 33 5.3 Pump Equipment and Protection 34 5.3.1 Pump Characteristics 34 5.3.2 Pump Protection 35 35 5.5Force Main Design Criteria 35 Page 161 of 239 8-4 Old Business 5.5.1 Pipe Materials 35 5.5.2 Velocity and Pipe Diameter 35 5.5.3 Pipe and Design Pressure 35 5.5.4 Shutoff and Check Valves 35 5.5.5 Isolation Valves 36 5.5.6 Combination Air Release and Air/Vacuum Valvcs 36 5.5.7 Drain Valves 36 5.5.8 Cleanouts 36 5.5.9 Termination 36 5.5.10 Identification 36 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Jurisdiction 1 1.3 Purpose 1 1.4 Amendments and Revisions 1 1.5 Enforcement Responsibility 2 1.6 Review and Acceptance 2 1.7 Interpretation 2 1.8 Relationship to Other Standards 3 1.8.1 State Public Wastewater System Code and Rules 3 1.8.2 State Construction Code 3 1.9 Variances from these Criteria 3 1.10 Adoption of the Utah Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications 3 1.11 Gray Water Irrigation Systems 3 1.12 Special Wastes and Industrial Pre -Treatment 4 1.13 Acronyms 5 1.14 Definitions of Terms 6 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 Planning Policy 9 2.3 Design Policy 9 2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy 9 2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy 10 Page 162 of 239 8-4 Old Business 2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy 10 2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy 10 2.8 Duty of the Engineer Preparing Development Documents 11 3.1 Introduction 12 3.2 Review Process 12 3.2.1 Pre -Application Consultation 12 3.2.2 Wastewater Utility Report Requirements 12 3.2.2.1 Format 12 3.2.2.2 Stand -Alone Document 12 3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy 13 3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies 13 3.3 Acceptance 13 3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction 13 3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report 13 3.4 Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report 13 3.4.1 Wastewater System Modeling 16 3.5. City Designation of Connection Points 16 3.6. Geotechnical Investigation and Report 16 3.7 Final Wastewater Utility Report 16 3.7.1 Wastewater System Modeling 19 3.7.2 Disclaimer 19 3.8 Construction Drawings 19 3.8.1 Wastewater System Improvements 19 3.8.2 Indemnification Statement 20 3.8.3 Construction Drawing Requirements 20 3.8.3.1 Wastewater Utility Construction Drawings 20 3.9 Record Drawings 22 4.1 Design Criteria - Reference Design Documents 23 4.2 Prohibited Installations 23 4.3 Unlawful Connections 23 4.4 Minimum Wastewater System Design Criteria 24 4.4.1 Design Flows 24 Page 163 of 239 8-4 Old Business 4.4.2 Hydraulic Design 24 4.4.3 Pipe Sizes and Grades 25 4.4.4 Selection of Pipe Material 25 4.4.5 General Wastewater System Layout Criteria 25 4.4.5.1 Location 25 4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout 25 4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout 26 4.4.5.4 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing a Water Main 26 4.4.5.5 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing of a Storm Drain 26 4.4.5.6 Limits on Minimum Vertical Clearance 26 4.4.6 Bored Crossings 26 4.4.7 Manholes 27 4.4.7.1 Layout 27 4.4.7.2 Manhole Sizing 28 4.4.7.3 Drop Manholes 29 4.4.7.4 Main Connections to Existing Manholes 29 4.4.7.5 Sanitary Sewers and Manholes Greater than 20 Feet 29 4.4.8 Inverted Wastewater Siphons 29 4.4.9 Fill Areas 29 4.4.10 Future Connections 29 4.4.11 Sanitary Sewer Service Lines 29 4.4.12.1 Ownership 29 4.4.12.2 Layout 30 4.4.12.3 Cleanouts 30 4.4.12.4 Structural Requirements 30 4.5 Easements 30 4.6 Sand/Oil and Grease Interceptors 31 5.1 Sewage Pump Stations (Lift Stations) and Force Mains 32 5.1.1 Scope 32 5.1.2 Compliance with State of Utah Standards 32 5.1.3 City Review and Approval 32 5.1.4 Flood Protection 32 Page 164 of 239 8-4 Old Business 5.1.5 Accessibility and Security 32 5.1.6 Grit 32 5.1.7 Station Ventilation 32 5.1.8 Odor Control 33 5.2 Minimum Lift Station Design Criteria 33 5.3 Pump Equipment and Protection 34 5.3.1 Pump Characteristics 34 5.3.2 Pump Protection 35 5.4 Overflow Basins 35 5.5 Force Main Design Criteria 35 5.5.1 Pipe Materials 35 5.5.2 Velocity and Pipe Diameter 35 5.5.3 Pipe and Design Pressure 35 5.5.4 Shutoff and Check Valves 35 5.5.5 Isolation Valves 36 5.5.6 Combination Air Release and Air/Vacuum Valves 36 5.5.7 Drain Valves 36 5.5.8 Cleanouts 36 5.5.9 Termination 36 5.5.10 Identification 36 Page 165 of 239 8-4 Old Business 1.1 Introduction These criteria and design standards together with all future amendments shall be known as the The City of Moab Wastewater Collection System Design Criteria Manual (hereafter called "Criteria"). All utility reports and plans, analyses, and designs, submitted as a requirement of the City of Moab Regulations (hereafter called "Regulations"), shall comply with these Criteria. 1.2 Jurisdiction These Criteria shall apply to all land within the incorporated area of the City of Moab, or served by the City, including any public lands. These Criteria shall apply to all systems and facilities constructed in or on City Rights -of -Way, easements dedicated for utilities across public or private property, easements for public use, and to all privately owned and maintained system facilities. 1.3 Purpose Presented in these Criteria are the policies and minimum technical criteria for the planning, analysis and design of wastewater collection systems within the boundaries of the City of Moab and areas served by the City. All subdivisions, site plans or any other proposed construction submitted for acceptance under the provisions of the Regulations shall include adequate and appropriate wastewater system planning, analysis, and design. Such planning, analysis, and design shall conform with or exceed the Criteria set forth herein. Wastewater collection system planning, analysis, and design that require policies and technical expertise not specifically addressed in these Criteria shall follow the provisions of the Utah State Code and Utah Code Annotated (see {R17 U.A.C.))._ In the event of a conflict, the State of Utah Codes and Rules will prevail. Interpretation will be provided by the City of Moab and/or the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Quality. 1.4 Amendments and Revisions Policies and criteria may be amended as new technology is developed or if experience gained in the use of these Criteria indicates a need for revision. All technical criteria and policy changes must be recommended by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Minor revisions will require the approval of the City. All major revisions will require adoption, by resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The City Engineer and Public Works Director shall monitor the performance and effectiveness of these Criteria and will recommend amendments and revisions as needed. Page 166 of 239 8-4 Old Business TABLE 1-1 EXAMPLES OF MINOR AND MAJOR REVISIONS MINOR MAJOR Grammar Policy Changes Submittal Requirements Clarifications Construction Detail Revisions for clarification, minor modification Technical Criteria Changes 1.5 Enforcement Responsibility The City shall review all wastewater system reports, plans, analyses, and designs, submitted as a requirement of the Regulations, for compliance with these Criteria. The Regulations are enforced by the City of Moab and authorized representatives. 1.6 Review and Acceptance The City shall review all submittals for general compliance with these Criteria. An acceptance by the City does not relieve the Owner, Engineer, or Designer from the responsibility of ensuring that the design, calculations, plans, specifications, construction, and record drawings are in compliance with these Criteria, and in compliance with other applicable State and Federal regulations. The City may, but is not required to, refer submittals to other agencies that have an interest or responsibility for wastewater system issues. Other review agencies may include regional, State, or Federal agencies responsible for wastewater collection, industrial pretreatment, treatment and other wastewater related issues. 1.7 Interpretation In the interpretation and application of these Criteria, the provisions shall be regarded as the minimum requirements for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. These Criteria shall therefore be regarded as remedial and shall be liberally construed to further its underlying purposes. Whenever a provision of these Criteria and any other provision of the Regulations or any provision in any law, ordinance, resolution, rule or regulation of any kind, contains any requirement(s) covering any of the same subject matter, the requirements that are more restrictive or impose higher standards shall govern, as determined by the City. Page 167 of 239 8-4 Old Business These Criteria shall not abrogate or annul any binding agreements, Development Improvement Agreements, easements, permits, utility reports or construction drawings accepted by the City prior to the effective date of these Criteria. 1.8 Relationship to Other Standards 1.8.1 State Public Wastewater System Code and Rules Public wastewater systems in the State of Utah are governed by the State of Utah Code, Annotated and the Utah Administrative Code. These codes and rules apply to policy, planning, criteria and construction of public water facilities and prevail if a conflict exists within the Criteria. 1.8.2 State Construction Code The State of Utah Construction codes and rules, with amendments, are incorporated by reference. These codes and rules apply to policy, planning, criteria and construction of public wastewater facilities and prevail if a conflict exists within the Criteria. 1.9 Variances from these Criteria Modifications to these Criteria shall require a formal variance request. Variances from the provisions of these Criteria may be considered on a case -by -case basis for specific applications only, and shall not establish a precedent for any other project or future development. 1.10 Adoption of the Utah Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications The latest Utah APWA Manual of Standard Plans and Manual of Standard Specifications and drawings are hereby adopted as the City of Moab Standard Details and Standard Specifications for wastewater system improvements. Variance from these standards must be approved by the City. In the event that multiple standards or sections of the standard apply, the City will determine the applicable standard. 4-441.11 Gray Water Irrigation Systems Gray water irrigation systems within the City of Moab are regulated by the Southeastern Utah Health Department (Health Department). Application for graywater systems must be made to the Health Department. Graywater systems must comply with Health Department requirements and the Utah Administrative Code {R317-401 U.A.C.}. Page 168 of 239 8-4 Old Business 1.12 Special Wastes and Industrial Pre -Treatment The City shall be notified of any potential waste streams that are different than typical residential wastes in quantity or characteristics. -Specifically, the following pollutants are prohibited: • Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the City wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) or collection system, including, but not limited to, waste streams with a closed cup flashpoint of less than 140°F (60°C); • Pollutants which will cause corrosive structural damage to the WWTP or collection system. Discharges with a pH lower than 5.0 or greater than 10 are prohibited; • Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which will cause obstruction to the flow in the system resulting in interference; • Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (BOD, etc.) released in a discharge at such volume or strength as to cause interference in the WWTP or collection system; • Heat in amounts, which will inhibit biological activity in the WWTP, resulting in interference, but in no case, heat in such quantities that the influent to the sewage treatment works exceeds 104°F (40°C); • Petroleum oil, nonbiodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause interference or pass through; • Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapor, or fumes within the WWTP or collection system in a quantity that may cause health or safety problems; • Any trucked or hauled pollutants, except at discharge points designated by the WWP; or • Any substance that contains concentrations of constituents greater than those specified in Table 1-2. TABLE 1-2 LIMITS TO WASTEWATER DISCHARGE CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATION (m2/LI Total solids (TS) 600 Volatile solids 300 Total suspended solids (TSS) 250 Volatile suspended solids 200 5-day Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) 200 Chemical oxygen demand (COD) 500 Total Nitrogen (TN) 60 Ammonia (NH4) 10 Total Phosphorus (TP) 10 Page 169 of 239 8-4 Old Business These special wastes may require pre-treatment, which includes providing any necessary treatment technology, equipment, disposal, and expert operators necessary for proper treatment. This proper treatment includes all resources necessary such that the waste stream delivered to the City of Moab wastewater collection and treatment facilities meets the above criteria and is acceptable to the City. The waste stream may not cause or facilitate violation of the facility's Utah Division of Water Quality discharge permit, volume and flowrate capacities and processing limitations. _The developer/owner must meet with the City prior to connection to determine the specific requirements for special wastes. 1.4213 Acronyms As used in this Manual, the following acronyms shall apply: ANSI APWA ASTM BOP CD and CDs DIA HP IPC IRC LP Max Min MDD MG MGD NAVD O&M OSHA PDF PE PSI PVC SCADA TOP OWTS American National Standards Institute American Public Works Association American Society for Testing and Materials Bottom of Pipe Construction Drawing(s) Development Improvement Agreement High Point International Plumbing Code International Residential Code Low Point Maximum Minimum Maximum Day Demand Million Gallons Million Gallons per Day North American Vertical Datum Operation and Maintenance Occupational Safety and Health Administration Peak Design Flow or Portable Document Format Professional Engineer Pounds per Square Inch Polyvinyl Chloride Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Top of Pipe On -Site Wastewater Treatment System Page 170 of 239 8-4 Old Business 1.4-3-14 Definitions of Terms CITY shall mean the City of Moab, Utah. CITY COUNCIL means the Moab City Council. CITY ENGINEER shall mean the City of Moab Engineer or other authorized representative of the Engineering Department. CODE or MUNICIPAL CODE shall mean the City of Moab Municipal Code, as amended. CONSTRUCTION DRAWING(S) (CD or CDs) shall mean Construction Drawings prepared by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Utah for the Developer and approved by the City depicting Public and/or Private Improvements to be constructed for the Project. CRITERIA or DESIGN CRITERIA shall mean the design criteria and requirements contained herein for wastewater facilities to be constructed in the City. DETAILS or STANDARD DETAILS shall mean details issued by City to be used or referenced in the Construction Drawings. DEVELOPER shall mean the party or parties desiring to construct Public and/or Private Improvements within City rights -of -way or easements, securing all required approvals and permits from the City and other applicable entities, and assuming full and complete responsibility for the Project. DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (DIA) shall mean a formal agreement between a Developer and the City that addresses development conditions and obligations. EASEMENT shall mean the right of the City to use lands owned by a another party for the purposes of maintenance, access, utilities, drainage or other use, as specified in an agreement between the City and the other party. ENGINEER shall mean the Professional Engineer retained by the Developer responsible for the creation and submission of utility reports and construction drawings to the City for approval for the purpose of one-time construction of facilities. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT shall mean the City of Moab Engineering Department. GRAY WATER shall mean untreated wastewater that has not been in contact with toilet water that is applied below the ground surface for irrigation. Page 171 of 239 8-4 Old Business LIFT STATION shall mean a sewage pumping station. MUNICIPAL CODE — See CODE. OWNER shall mean the person(s) in title to any portion of the Property, according to the records of the Grand County Clerk and Recorder. The use of the singular "Owner" shall refer to all Owners of the Property. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those improvements not identified as Public Improvements, and which are not generally installed within the City rights -of -way, easements, or other City -owned lands. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER shall mean an individual currently registered with the Utah Division of Professional and Occupational Licensing as a professional engineer. PROJECT shall mean the Public or Private Improvements as designated in the approved Construction Drawings to be constructed in conformance with these Design Criteria. The Project is inclusive of any and all Public or Private Improvement Projects for or within the City, whether Development Projects, Private Utility Projects, Capital Improvement Projects or other types of proj ects. PROPERTY shall mean the real property located in the City of Moab. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those public facilities including, but not limited to, pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian/bike/equestrian paths, storm drain facilities with related appurtenances, culverts, channels, bridges, water distribution, transmission and storage facilities with related appurtenances, wastewater collection facilities with related appurtenances, water purification facilities, pavement markings/signage/striping, traffic signals and related appurtenances, and those processes integral to construction of other Public Improvements listed herein, which upon their completion are to be dedicated to the City for operation and maintenance by the City and which are installed within the City rights -of -way, easements, or other City -owned lands. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR shall mean the City of Moab Public Works Director REGULATIONS shall mean the Charter, ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the City, including the Code, and other provisions of all zoning, subdivision and building codes or any other applicable design criteria adopted by the City, as the same may be amended periodically and applied uniformly throughout the City. Page 172 of 239 8-4 Old Business SHALL shall mean a mandatory requirement or condition, as approved by the City. STANDARD DETAILS — See DETAILS. VARIANCE REQUEST shall mean a formal request with adequate documentation and justification for a variance from the standards, provisions, policies or submittal requirements set forth in these Design Criteria that meets the requirements in Section 1.9 of these Design Criteria. WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN shall mean the City of Moab Wastewater Master Plan. Page 173 of 239 8-4 Old Business 2.1 Introduction Provisions for adequate service, wastewater collection and treatment are necessary to preserve and promote the general health, welfare, and economic well-being of the residents of the City of Moab. The City of Moab must provide coordination, review, and master planning of the system in order that the integration of each component of the system meets the intent and purpose of the system as a whole. The development of the City's wastewater system is governed by the policies provided below, as facilitated through the implementation of the Criteria contained herein. 2.2 Planning Policy All developments on land within the City that are served by the City's public wastewater system shall provide planning and design for wastewater loadings, including peaking factors. Reports and plans shall be submitted for all new development and redevelopment within the City jurisdiction. These reports shall conform to the requirements set forth herein and the provisions otherwise stipulated by the City during the development process. Redevelopment shall be defined as any land disturbance or reconstruction that results in a reconfiguration of existing wastewater system facilities or an increase in demands. During the initial planning stages of the development, a pre -application meeting shall be coordinated with the City. One purpose of this meeting is to assist the City and the developer to determine the level of wastewater service that is available and needed by the developer. 2.3 Design Policy Wastewater system planning and design within the City shall adhere to the Criteria contained herein, the administrative rules promulgated by the Utah Division of Water Quality, the Utah Division of Water Rights (as related to return flows) and acceptance procedures of the City. Prohibited facilities and connections shall be as described in these Criteria. 2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy The construction of improvements for and within the City shall conform to the City's construction permit, standard details and approved plans, and shall adhere to all City, County, State, and Federal regulations applicable to the work. This shall include the acquisition of all necessary permits, which may include, but not be limited to, stream alteration permits, discharge permits, road cut permits, flood plain related permits and letters (including FEMA review and approval when applicable), Utah Division of Water Quality approvals, traffic control permits and all other required permits and approvals. At the completion of construction, all permits and service agreements with power companies and any other private utilities shall be transferred into the Developer's name, and shall under no circumstances be transferred to, or held in the name of Page 174 of 239 8-4 Old Business the City, unless the City is the customer. Any work proposed to take place within existing City of Moab streets must be reviewed and approved by the City. The type of crossing allowed, traffic control, street repair specifications, etc. shall be as determined by the City. Prior to placing the facilities into service and initial acceptance by the City, all construction related provisions required by the City shall be satisfied, including startup procedures, inspections and testing of the facilities, and receipt of O&M Manuals and Record Drawings. Additionally, all requirements and responsibilities shall be complied with in association with the warranty period as set forth in the City's Regulations (not to be less than 1 year). 2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy The delineation between City -owned and privately owned portions of the system and the associated maintenance responsibilities for each, shall be as set forth in the latest editions of the Municipal Code and Standard Details. Upon execution of Final Acceptance, sanitary sewer mainssewers, force mains, lift stations, and all appurtenant City -owned facilities, shall become the sole property of the City, and full legal and equitable title thereto shall be vested in the City free and clear of any liens, claims or rights of any third party in or to the Public Improvements. 2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy The design of all wastewater system facilities within the City must provide for access and long- term operation and maintenance of the facilities by the City. Operation and Maintenance manuals associated with all components to be installed as part of the wastewater system shall be provided to the City with the Record Drawings, unless otherwise specifically waived by the City. Utility easements or tracts and access easements shall be provided for all wastewater system facilities outside of public right-of-way as set forth in these Criteria, or as otherwise required by the City, and shall be adequate for the operation, maintenance and replacement of the facilities. 2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy Public safety and the protection of City staff shall be an essential objective when planning, designing, constructing, operating and maintaining the City's wastewater collection system facilities. All such facilities shall be designed with careful consideration of the potential hazards associated with the use and long-term operation and maintenance of the facility. The design phase of all projects shall evaluate the health and safety risks associated with the facilities, and shall include appropriate design features to minimize these risks and to adequately protect the general public and City personnel from the hazards. Equipment for confined space entry in accordance with OSHA and other applicable regulatory agency requirements shall be provided at all City of Moab facilities, as required. Hatches with fall prevention covers, intermediate Page 175 of 239 8-4 Old Business platforms, handrails, safety lighting, ventilation etc. shall be as required by the City, or any applicable code. 2.8 Duty of the Engineer Preparing Development Documents These standards establish criteria and policies for the design and subsequent construction of the City's public wastewater system. These standards are not intended to substitute for engineering knowledge, judgement or experience. It is the responsibility of the design (development) Engineer to understand and apply sound engineering principals related to public wastewater systems to the planning, design and construction of wastewater system improvements. It is also the responsibility of the Engineer to understand all federal, state and local regulations related to the public wastewater system. These criteria should be reviewed by the Engineer, who shall evaluate their applicability. If the Engineer identifies criteria that are inapplicable or inappropriate in a specific location or specific situation, the engineer shall bring the issue to the attention of the City. Page 176 of 239 8-4 Old Business 3.1 Introduction The requirements presented in this chapter shall be used to aid the Engineer or Applicant in the preparation of utility reports, modeling evaluations, and Construction Drawings for wastewater system facilities. This Chapter applies primarily to submittal requirements for wastewater collection systems and the associated Criteria provided in Chapter 4. The requirements presented herein are the minimum necessary, and will be used to evaluate the adequacy of all submittals made to the City. 3.2 Review Process 3.2.1 Pre -Application Consultation A pre -application consultation with the City of Moab Planning Department is strongly encouraged for any type of development or redevelopment. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss general information about the project, pertinent aspects of the Criteria, the required scope of the utility reports, and any special procedures, analyses, and submittal requirements that may be applicable. 3.2.2 Wastewater Utility Report Requirements Preliminary and final wastewater utility reports shall be provided to the City of Moab. The purpose of the preliminary wastewater utility report is to identify existing wastewater infrastructure, provide preliminary estimates of wastewater loading, provide an initial plan for wastewater infrastructure and determine the feasibility of providing wastewater service to the development via the public wastewater collection system. The purpose of the final wastewater utility report, which is to be submitted with the final construction plans, is to identify the final wastewater infrastructure plan. 3.2.2.1 Format All required reports shall be prepared on 81/2" x 11" paper (except that maps and figures shall generally be 11" x 17" or larger) and be bound, and shall follow the format contained in the report checklists. Supporting drawings, figures, and tables shall be bound into the reports or included in an attached pocket. Reports shall include a narrative presenting the project for review in accordance with the information presented in these Criteria, and the requirements established by the City for the appropriate submittal. Paper and electronic (PDF) copies of the report shall be provided. Electronic files of computer models and GIS files shall be provided if requested by the City. 3.2.2.2 Stand -Alone Document The wastewater utility reports shall be stand-alone documents. When references are made or assumptions are based on previously submitted reports, the reports must include the appropriate Page 177 of 239 8-4 Old Business excerpts, pages, tables, and maps containing the referenced information. Assumptions made in previous reports must be verified and substantiated in subsequent reports. Reports shall be legible. 3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy Any report with incomplete or missing information shall result in the report being returned without review. The City reserves the right to require additional information beyond that specifically required in these Criteria. 3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies The review and approval of the project by State, Federal, and local agencies other than the City, shall be the responsibility of the Developer. The Developer shall be required to address all referral agency comments, and to have such comments incorporated into the applicable utility report and plans submitted to the City. 3.3 Acceptance 3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction The final wastewater utility report shall conform to the construction documents used to bid the project, and shall be approved by the City prior to the construction of any wastewater system improvements. 3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report The approval of the final wastewater utility report shall expire simultaneously with the expiration of the approval of the project unless extended in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. At the time the approval of the final utility report expires, the report shall be deemed invalid and a resubmittal will be required. In order to be re -approved, it must be demonstrated that the concepts, designs, and calculations presented in the report are consistent with the City's current Criteria. 3.4 Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report The Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report shall review and discuss the existing wastewater system infrastructure and the wastewater needs of the development. The report shall also identify the existing infrastructure needed to support the development. The City Engineering Department and Public Works Department will coordinate with the developer to provide the wastewater system data needed as an input to the Engineer's design. Page 178 of 239 8-4 Old Business The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report that shall be submitted: I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. Name of Project, including legal name of development. B. Address. C. Owner. D. Developer. E. Engineer. F. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable. II. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION A. Site Location. 1. Site Vicinity Map. 2. Township, Range, Section, and'/a Section. 3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development. 4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments. B. Description of Property and Land Use. 1. Total area in acres. 2. Total number of equivalent residential units (ERUs) proposed for the development at build -out with a breakdown of units by type projected by phase (if applicable) calculated by utilizing the Utah Administrative Code Minimum Sizing Requirements 1R317 U.A.C.}. 3. Area (acres) and land use for all parcels to be served within the development boundaries. 4. Major and minor drainages and floodplains, including FEMA desigations. 5. Existing irrigation canals or ditches. 6. Significant geologic features and topography. 7. Existing On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS). 8. Existing water wells. 9. Easements/tracts may not be known initially; however, provide a statement that easements or tracts necessary for utilities will be provided at time of preliminary site plan, in accordance with City standards regarding location and size of easements and tracts. Page 179 of 239 8-4 Old Business III. EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM A. Existing Collection System. Discuss the existing sanitary sewers, interceptors, lift stations, and force mains in the vicinity of the development, including sizes and locations that will serve the proposed development. IV. ESTIMATED PROPOSED LOADINGS A. Average Day Loadings. Estimated hydraulic and BOD5 loadings must be provided for all phases of development. If wastewater is expected to be typical for residential wastewater, BOD5 may be assumed to be typical. If typical, this assumption shall be stated in the report. B. Peak Loadings. Estimated peaking factors for hydraulic loadings shall be provided. C. Special Waste Characteristics (if different from typical residential wastewater). A detailed listing of special wastewater constituents shall be provided, along with a detailed description of needed treatment processes. A listing of pre-treatment processes provided by the project Owner shall be discussed in detail. V. PROPOSED WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM A. Proposed Collection System. Provide a general overview of the anticipated collection system layout, and discuss any extensions from the site to the existing wastewater system that are necessary to serve the development. The locations and types of pipes, manholes, clean -outs, and other facilities shall be provided. B. Proposed Wastewater Facilities. Discuss any anticipated lift stations, force mains, pretreatment facilities, etc., that will likely be required to adequately serve the development. Page 180 of 239 8-4 Old Business VI. REFERENCES Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the report. 3.4.1 Wastewater System Modeling The City maintains a wastewater system model. Once the preliminary wastewater system report is received and found to be adequate, the City will determine whether wastewater system modeling is required. If the modeling is required, the City will determine the level of modeling needed for the development and will estimate the cost of modeling. The developer will be responsible for the cost of wastewater system modeling. 3.5. City Designation of Connection Points If the City of Moab determines that the Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report meets the requirements set forth in these Criteria, the City will provide wastewater service at designated tie-in points. &63.6. Geotechnical Investigation and Report A geotechnical investigation and report is required to provide a basis for wastewater collection system design. The investigation must include boreholes or excavations to a depth at least 2-feet deeper than the bottom of the anticipated trench excavation. Samples shall be collected and analyzed at a geotechnical laboratory to determine soil classification, moisture contents, dry density, strength, water level (if detected) and corrosion potential. The investigation shall identify expansive and collapsible soils. The report shall include recommendations for foundations backfill, utility and trench construction, and compaction. The report shall include a discussion of the suitability of the on -site soils for use for the intended purposes. 3.7 Final Wastewater Utility Report The Final Wastewater Utility Report shall describe final wastewater infrastructure, including final modeling and calculations. The Final Wastewater Utility Report shall be consistent with final construction drawings. The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Final Wastewater Utility Report that shall be submitted with the Construction Documents: Page 181 of 239 8-4 Old Business I. TITLE SHEET A. Name of Project, including legal name of Development. B. Address. C. Owner. D. Developer. E. Engineer. F. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable. II. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION A. Site Location. 1. Site Vicinity Map 2. Township, Range, Section, and 1/4 Section. 3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development. 4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments. B. Description of Property and Land Use. 1. Total area in acres. 2. Discussion of project phasing, if applicable. 3. Total number of ERUs proposed for the development at build -out with a breakdown of units by type projected by phase (if applicable). 4. Area (acres), land use for all parcels to be served within the development boundaries (initial and future phases, if applicable) and number of lots. 5. Sizes of schools, commercial and industrial buildings (initial and future phases, if applicable). 6. Major and minor drainages and floodplains, including FEMA designations. 7. Existing irrigation canals or ditches. 8. Significant geologic features and topography. 9. Existing On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS). 10. Existing water wells. III. CALCULATED FLOWS A. Average Day Loadings. Estimated hydraulic and BOD5 loadings must be provided for all phases of development. If wastewater is expected to be typical for residential wastewater, BOD5 may be assumed to be typical. This shall be stated in the report. Page 182 of 239 8-4 Old Business B. Peak Loadings. Estimated peaking factors for hydraulic loadings shall be provided. C. Special Waste Characteristics (if different from typical residential wastewater). A detailed listing of special wastewater constituents shall be provided, along with a detailed description of needed treatment processes. A listing of pre-treatment processes provided by the project Owner shall be discussed in detail. IV. EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM A. Existing Collection System. Discuss the existing sanitary sewer mainssewers, interceptors, lift stations, and force mains in the vicinity of the development, including sizes and locations that will need to be extended to serve the proposed development. V. PROPOSED WASTEWATER SYSTEM A. Proposed Collection System. Provide a description of all proposed wastewater facilities and a general overview of the anticipated collection system layout, including the proposed line sizes. Describe the tie-ins to the existing wastewater system and the sizes and lengths of any extensions necessary to serve the development. B. Proposed Wastewater Facilities. Discuss any lift stations, force mains, pretreatment facilities, etc., that will likely be required to adequately serve the development. C. Land Dedication Requirements. Generally describe any portions of the proposed wastewater system that are not planned to be located in public right-of-way, and will therefore require the dedication of tracts or utility easements to the City. Page 183 of 239 8-4 Old Business VI. POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT (DIA) ITEMS Discuss any potential DIA items such as needed off -site improvements, improvements necessary for a project or project phase to be independently sustainable, etc. VII. POTENTIAL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS Generally discuss all foreseeable Federal, State, County, and Local permitting requirements associated with the project. XI. REFERENCES Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the report. 3.67.1 Wastewater System Modeling The City maintains a wastewater system model. It is anticipated that wastewater system modeling will be performed once the Preliminary Wastewater Utility Report is submitted. The results of the City's wastewater modeling should be included in the Final Wastewater Utility Report. The City of Moab should be notified of any changes. The modeling will be used by the City as needed. The developer will be responsible for the cost of wastewater system modeling. 3.67.2 Disclaimer The City is not responsible or liable for assumptions made by the Developer regarding utility information associated with the proposed development. 3.78 Construction Drawings 3.78.1 Wastewater System Improvements Wastewater system improvements within public rights -of -way or utility easements are required to be designed, approved, and constructed in accordance with the City's Regulations, subdivision requirements of the Municipal Code, the City's Design Criteria and Standard Details, sound engineering principles, and the conditions of any variances obtained from the City. Page 184 of 239 8-4 Old Business 3.78.2 Indemnification Statement Construction Drawings are reviewed by the City of Moab for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the City of Moab for accuracy and correctness of calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed for any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the City for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. 3.78.3 Construction Drawing Requirements In general, construction drawings shall include plan and profile drawings that convey the horizontal and vertical alignment of the improvements, and all other pertinent plans, sections and detailing necessary to construct the proposed facilities. All construction drawings submitted to the City for review, comment, and approval of wastewater system improvements shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Utah. Said Professional Engineer shall be responsible for the information contained on the construction drawings, which shall bear the Professional Engineer's seal prior to final approval for construction. The Developer, Contractor and Engineer associated with the construction drawings shall be responsible for the adequacy and satisfactory performance of the designs and the installation of all items therein, and any failure or unsatisfactory performance of the system, so constructed, shall not be a cause for action against the City. Approval of the construction drawings by the City signifies only that the construction drawings meet the minimum stipulations of these design criteria and City requirements based upon the information provided to the City by the Engineer and/or Developer, and makes no finding, representation, or warranty that the system and associated components will perform satisfactorily. 3.78.3.1 Wastewater Utility Construction Drawings In addition to the general formatting and information to be included on all sheets of a construction drawing (e.g., north arrow, scale, project boundaries, lot lines, rights -of -way, tracts, approval blocks, etc.), the following information shall be included on the final Wastewater Utility Plans. 1. Legend: Each sheet shall show the symbols pertaining to the sheet. 2. Vertical Datum: All elevations used for the planning, design and construction of facilities shall be on the NAVD88 Datum. No conversion equation is allowed. 3. Horizontal Benchmark and Coordinates: The horizontal benchmark shall be specified. In order to facilitate the City's GIS mapping efforts, all construction drawings shall be placed in the State Plane NAD83, Utah Central Zone Coordinate System and include the coordinates of a known property corner on or adjacent to the site. Page 185 of 239 8-4 Old Business 4. Plan views shall be oriented so that north is up on the sheet or to the right. 5. Overall Wastewater System Plan: In plan view, provide all information and dimensions for horizontal layout of proposed sanitary sewer and force mains including but not limited to manholes, wye connections, sanitary sewer service lines, cleanouts, lift stations, and any other appurtenances that are part of the wastewater collection system. Coordinates shall be provided for the locations of manholes, lift stations and other key components. 6. Plan views shall show the locations and sizes of all existing and proposed utility lines and appurtenances (water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, gas, electric, telephone, cable, fiber optic, etc.) on and adjacent to the site. Plan views shall show the location of all existing water wells and On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) on and adjacent to the site. 7. Plan views shall show existing sanitary sewer and force mains with sizes; manholes; sanitary sewer service taps and lines; clean -outs; lift stations; and any other appurtenances that are part of the wastewater collection system on and adjacent to the site. 8. Plan views shall show existing and proposed curb, gutter, and sidewalks; and all existing and proposed obstructions, such as vaults, catch basins, traffic islands, street lights, walls or other permanent structures on and adjacent to the site. 9. Plan views and profiles shall show the tie-ins to the existing wastewater collection system, including sizes of existing mainssewers. In addition, the nearest manholes on existing mainssewers shall be shown or, at a minimum, the distance to these manholes shall be included on the CDs. 10. Plan views and profiles shall show all needed off -site improvements, extensions of service or upgrades to the City's wastewater collection system. 11. Plan views shall show and label as to type and width, all existing and proposed easements that are on and adjacent to the site. Recordation information shall be included for all existing easements. 12. Profile views are required for all sanitary sewersewers and force mains and must show proposed streets profiles and existing ground surface profiles. The following information shall be included: a. All high points (HP) and low points (LP) along the sanitary sewer and force mains shall be identified; b. Where required by these Criteria, combination air release and air/vacuum valves and drain valves shall be shown on force mains, with the TOP elevations provided. c. All utility crossings shall be identified. 13. Profile views or plan views: Adequate pipe elevation information is required for all utility crossings of water, sanitary sewer, force main, stormwater, gas, electric lines, etc. The following information shall be included: Page 186 of 239 8-4 Old Business a. Types and sizes of the utility lines at the crossing and the location of the crossing. b. If any pipes at a crossing are to be encased, the coordinates at each end of the encasement, and the type and thickness of the encasements shall be specified. In addition, all utility crossing shall include either: (1) A reference to the sheet where the crossing information is shown; or (2) TOP and BOP elevations and vertical clearance at the crossing with a callout of "(Min. = 1.5')" wherever the clearance is 2 feet or less. 14. Wastewater System Details: All pertinent details related to wastewater system improvements, such as manholes, outside drop manholes, sanitary sewer service line connections, sanitary sewer clean -outs, proposed utility crossings, including concrete blankets, trenching, etc., shall be shown on detail sheets on the construction drawings. References to the Utah APWA plans may be provided. In this case, the detail drawings don't need to be provided in the plan set. 3.89 Record Drawings All wastewater system improvements constructed within public rights -of -way and dedicated easements must be formally accepted by the City. Page 187 of 239 8-4 Old Business 4.1 Design Criteria - Reference Design Documents Standards and reference publications pertinent to the design of wastewater facilities within the City are listed below. Unless otherwise specified, the latest editions shall apply. • Utah State Code, Annotated • Utah Administrative Code • Utah American Public Works Association (Utah APWA) • All applicable International Codes recognized by the City including, but not limited to, the International Building Code (IBC), the International Plumbing Code (IPC), the International Fire Code (IFC), the International Residential Code (IRC), and the International Mechanical Code (IMC) • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) • American National Standards Institute (ANSI) • Utah Depar tment of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) • City of Moab Municipal Code • City of Moab Wastewater Master Plan • Gravity Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction (Current Version). Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 60. American Society of Civil Engineers/Water Pollution Control Federation. 4.2 Prohibited Installations The following installations are prohibited unless otherwise approved by the City. Items listed below reference sections contained in these Criteria that provide the minimum design requirements to be addressed should a variance be pursued. • On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) • Gray water systems • Private Ejector Pumps and Private Lift stations, unless approved by the City • Inverted Wastewater Siphons • Manholes and sewer lines over 20 feet deep • Elevated Wastewater Pipelines 4.3 Unlawful Connections It shall be unlawful to discharge roof drainage, foundation drainage, sump pumps, surface drainage, storm water, solid wastes, or any other illicit discharges to the wastewater collection system.. Page 188 of 239 8-4 Old Business 4.4 Minimum Wastewater System Design Criteria This section presents the minimum technical criteria for the analysis and design of wastewater systems within the boundaries of the City of Moab and other areas served by the City, including collection mainssewers, sanitary sewer service lines, and the applicable appurtenances associated with these installations. Any special criteria beyond those contained herein, and as determined necessary by the City, shall be discussed at the pre -application consultation (or as the issue arises). 4.4.1 Design Flows Average daily loadings, peaking factors and average annual loadings shall be based on the criteria included in the current Utah Administrative Code and based upon information included in the Wastewater Master Plan. This information is currently located at {R317-3 U.A.C.}. The City may adjust the loading values based on the evaluation of actual use data, a current master plan or other conditions determined to affect the safety and welfare of the public. 4.4.2 Hydraulic Design Wastewater systems shall be designed to provide a minimum velocity of 2.0 feet per second at the peak design flow. In situations where the minimum velocity of 2.0 feet per second cannot be met, an explanation and justification shall be included in the Final Wastewater Utility Report. The maximum velocity shall not exceed 10 feet per second. Drop manholes shall be provided to break steep slopes to limit the velocities in conformance with this criterion. Where drop manholes are impractical for velocity reduction, the sewer must be approved by variance and shall be of PVC or other abrasion resistant material approved by the City. Where actual flow will be much below normal for several years, the minimum velocity shall be achieved by suitable grades at the initial design flow rate. Care shall be taken to design invert elevations at manholes in such a manner that the energy gradient is consistently falling in the direction of the flow. Sanitary sewers shall be sized to convey the peak design flow in accordance with the following table: Pipe Diameter (inches) Maximum Depth of Flow/Pipe Diameter < 15 0.5 >15 0.75 Computation of velocity of flow shall be based on a coefficient of roughness "n" in the Manning formula as follows: n = 0.013 (min). Page 189 of 239 8-4 Old Business At all junctions where a smaller diameter main discharges in to a larger one, the crowns (obverts) of the two pipes shall have matching elevations. No surcharging of sanitary sewer lines is allowed. 4.4.3 Pipe Sizes and Grades Sanitary sewer mains shall be a minimum of 8 inches in diameter. Service lines shall be a minimum of 4 inches in diameter. The minimum sewer slopes shall comply with the slopes included in Table R317-3-2.3(D)(4) of the Utah Administrative Code. 4.4.4 Selection of Pipe Material Sewer linesGravity sewers in the City collection system shall be constructed of PVC, or fiber- glass reinforced polymer mortar or concrete, unless special conditions require another material. Force mains shall be PVC or HDPE. Other pipe materials must be approved by the City prior to use. If concrete is to be used, the collection system must be evaluated for sulfide corrosion risk and corrosion mitigation measures must be implemented as needed. Sewers at stream crossings or crossings with water lines shall be ductile iron in accordance with {R317 U.A.C.}. Materials for building sewers (between structures and the City collection main) shall be in accordance with plumbing code. 4.4.5 General Wastewater System Layout Criteria 4.4.5.1 Location All sanitary sewers and appurtenances shall be installed in dedicated rights -of -way or dedicated utility easements. Sewers or manholes shall not be installed parallel to, and directly below, any concrete such as sidewalks, trails, curbs, or gutters. In general, sanitary sewer mainssewers shall be located in public streets near the center of the south or west lane. Sanitary sewers and manholes shall not be located in vehicle wheel paths. A sewer shall not be closer than 5 feet to a gutter. Sanitary sewer lines and manholes shall not be located within detention pond areas. Where it is necessary to locate a sanitary sewer main along back lot lines, the alignment shall be specifically approved by the City. Manholes installed along lot lines shall be provided locking - type covers. 4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout Sewers shall be laid with a minimum separation of 10 feet horizontally, edge -to -edge, from all water lines. Sewers shall have a minimum separation of 10 feet horizontally, centerline -to - centerline, from all other existing or proposed utilities wherever possible. The City of Moab must specifically approve any variance from these requirements in the event that it has been determined that it is impossible to maintain the specified horizontal separation distances. Page 190 of 239 8-4 Old Business Sewers adjacent to developments shall be designed to extend along the entire frontage of the property to be served, from property line to property line, with termination in a manhole. This provides for wastewater service for adjacent Developers or Builders in the future. Within developments, sanitary sewer mainssewers shall be extended at least ten feet horizontally uphill from the lowest lot corner of the uppermost lot, and shall terminate in a manhole. 4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout Sanitary sewer mainssewers shall have a minimum cover of 5 feet to finished ground surface, and a maximum cover of 20 feet unless otherwise approved by variance. Sanitary sewer mainssewers shall be deep enough to collect wastewater from all basements by gravity flow. When less than 9 feet of elevation difference exists between the finished lot grade at the building line and the top of the sanitary sewer main, such conditions shall be clearly addressed in the required Utility Reports, with notes provided on the record drawings indicating which lots are served by a "shallow sanitary sewer." Appropriate elevation information shall be provided on the record drawings for all such mains. For sewers that receive or will receive flow from offsite, the minimum depth to the sewer is 9 feet, unless otherwise approved by the City. 4.4.5.4 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing a Water Main When it is necessary for sewers to cross public water system pipes, the crossings shall be in accordance with the State of Utah requirements. These requirements are located at {R309-550-7 U.A.C.{ and {R317-3-2.9(B)(1) U.A.C}. 4.4.5.5 Sanitary Sewer Main Crossing of a Storm SewerDrain When sanitary sewer mainssewers or force mains cross a storm sewerdrain, regardless of vertical clearance and which pipe crosses over the other, each joint of the storm sewer within the trench width of the crossing shall be encased in a concrete collar at least 6 inches thick and extending at least 6 inches each side of each joint. 4.4.5.6 Limits on Minimum Vertical Clearance Under no circumstances shall the minimum vertical clearance between any two crossing utilities be less than 12 inches unless approved by the City. 4.4.6 Bored Crossings When a sewer passes under a State roadway, an arterial or collector roadway as defined by the City, railroad, drainage or irrigation ditch, the sewer shall be located within bored steel casing pipe, unless otherwise allowed to be open cut by the jurisdictional entity being crossed. The carrier pipe shall be supported by casing spacers. The casing shall be sealed around the sewer at the casing ends. The casing shall have a minimum of 5 feet of cover. The casing pipe shall extend the entire width of the right-of-way or easement of the crossing structure, or as directed by the City or other jurisdictional entity. Page 191 of 239 8-4 Old Business Crossing at ditches shall include cutoff walls at each side of the crossing, either as required by the jurisdictional entity, or as analyzed and designed by the Engineer at the direction of the Engineering Department. Casing pipe shall be smooth -walled, non -coated pipe of welded steel construction conforming to ANSFAWWA C200, and shall be seamless or straight seam steel pipe with minimum yield strength of 35,000 psi. The casing pipe shall be new material and have a minimum wall thickness as follows unless specified otherwise. Carrier Pipe Nominal Diameter Min. Casing Pipe O.D. Min. Wall Thickness* 4" 12" 0.250" 6" 14" 0.3125" 8" 16" 0.3125" 12" 20" 0.3750" *The boring contractor shall determine and provide a greater wall thickness if needed. Other pipe sizes shall be designed by a professional engineer and submitted to the City of Moab for review. Gasi,n N shad-bec-at-,,.,a; all-, pr-eto,.*o,a by bury, . a per of sacrificial anodes at least 5 feet equal to the casing springline. Test stations shall be provided on treated wooden posts so that the condition of the sacrificial anode can be determined. Anode pairs shall be offset perpendicularly 5 feet away from the casing pipe, and shall be placed in native soils, not imported backfills. The cathodic protection system shall be designed by personnel experienced with cathodic protections systems.The Engineer shall evaluate the risk of corrosion to the casing based on the corrosively of the surrounding soils, as well as any known risks from nearby stray current, buried electrical lines, nearby impressed current corrosion protection systems or other factors. For each casing installed, the Engineer shall provide a written evaluation as to whether corrosion protection is needed. If needed, the Engineer shall provide a design for corrosion protection. The City preference is for sacrificial anodes systems rather than impressed current systems. The design shall be submitted to the City for review. Long-term maintenance of the system, including anode assessment and replacement, shall be addressed in the submittal. evaluation. 4.4.7 Manholes 4.4.7.1 Layout 1. Location: Manholes for access to sewers shall be provided at the following locations: a. All junctions of sanitary sewers. b. All points of change in alignment, grade or pipe size. Page 192 of 239 8-4 Old Business c. All points of industrial and commercial discharge to facilitate observation and sampling. d. The upstream terminus of the main. e. Cleanouts shall not be allowed to replace manholes on sanitary sewer lines 8 inch and larger. 2. Alignment and Spacing: Sewer manholes shall be aligned and spaced as follows: a. Sewer main5Sewers shall be installed in a straight alignment, both in line and grade, and not curved between manholes. b. Maximum spacing between manholes shall be 400 feet for lines 15 inches or smaller and 500 feet for lines 18 inches and larger. c. Maximum change in alignment shall not exceed 90 degrees. d. Manhole lids shall not be aligned with vehicle wheel paths, or within 2 feet either direction of the street crown. e. No drop -in style riser or paver rings are allowed. Grade rings beneath the ring and cover are allowable for final grade adjustment with a maximum of 12 inches. 3. Access: Provisions for manhole access shall be as follows: a. Manholes shall not be located in areas that are subject to flooding from surface runoff. If the possibility of surface runoff flooding cannot be avoided, a watertight lid as approved by the City shall be installed to prevent inflow. b. Manholes shall be located in areas that allow direct access by maintenance vehicles when it is not feasible to locate the manhole in a public street. c. Manholes shall not be located in open space access roads, wherever possible. If it is impossible to locate a manhole outside an access road, then the cover shall be at the grade of the access road and a 10' x 10' concrete collar shall be installed around the manhole. All manholes located outside dedicated street right-of-way shall be designed and constructed with a locking -type cover and the manhole ring shall be bolted to the manhole cone and the manhole lid shall be raised in accordance with the City's Standard Detail. Marker shall be installed to mark the location of manholes outside of pavement. d. All manhole lids shall be depressed 1/4" to 1/2" below any adjacent finished street surface. 4.4.7.2 Manhole Sizing Manholes for sanitary sewers up to 18 inches in diameter shall have an inside diameter not less than 4-feet. Manholes for sanitary sewers 18 inches to 36 inches shall have an inside diameter of not less than 5-feet. Manholes for sanitary sewers 36 inches to 54 inches shall have an inside diameter of 6 feet. Manholes for sanitary sewers over 54 inches shall be of special design. If the angle of deflection does not permit use of a 6 foot inside diameter manhole, then a special Page 193 of 239 8-4 Old Business manhole detail must be submitted for review and approval by the City. There shall be a bench located below the bottom manhole ladder rung. 4.4.7.3 Drop Manholes 1. Drop manholes shall be in accordance with the City's standard details. 4.4.7.4 Main Connections to Existing Manholes No new connection shall be made with existing manholes. When connections are required at the location of an existing manhole, the manhole shall be replaced unless otherwise approved by the City. 4.4.7.5 Sanitary Sewers and Manholes Greater than 20 Feet Where sanitary sewer mainssewers or manholes cannot be designed at depths less than 20 feet, a variance shall be obtained. 4.4.8 Inverted Wastewater Siphons The design of inverted wastewater siphons, or sag pipes, shall be avoided, unless approved by the City. When inverted siphon construction is deemed necessary and approved by the City, the facility shall have at least two separate barrels with a minimum pipe size of 8 inches, and shall include appurtenances for convenient flushing and maintenance. Inlet and outlet structures shall have adequate clearance for access and maintenance operations, and sufficient head shall be provided and pipes sized to ensure velocities of at least 3.0 feet per second under average flow for both initial and future build -out conditions. The inlet and outlet shall be arranged so that normal flows can be diverted to one barrel, and that either barrel may be removed from service for cleaning or repair. 4.4.9 Fill Areas Where sanitary sewer lines will be constructed in fill areas, all fill materials shall be placed and compacted to final grade prior to the installation of the sanitary sewer line and appurtenances. 4.4.10 Future Connections Manholes shall have pipes stubbed out that are sized to accommodate flows from the upstream basin whenever a future extension of the sanitary sewer main is anticipated. The main line stub - out shall be capped and sealed. 4.4.11 Sanitary Sewer Service Lines All single family residential dwellings, each individual unit in multi -family complexes, and each commercial business and industrial customer shall be served by a separate, independent sanitary sewer service line. 4.4.12.1 Ownership After a building is connected through a service line to the sanitary sewer, the service shall become a part of the building, and the Owner of the premises shall be responsible for the Page 194 of 239 8-4 Old Business operation and maintenance of the entire service line (building sewer) between the building and the City sewer, excluding the wye at the connection. Although the service line up to the wye is the responsibility of the Owner, the service lines and associated connections to the main shall be inspected and tested by the City prior to backfill. The inspection of service line stub -outs will take place at the same time inspections are conducted for the installation of the sanitary sewer main. Inspection of the entire service line will be made when the service line is extended to the building. 4.4.12.2 Layout The Owner shall install a service line stub -out from the sanitary sewer main to each individual lot. Where sidewalks are proposed to be constructed, the stub -out shall be constructed to 15 feet beyond the back of the sidewalk. Where sidewalks will not be constructed, the stub -out shall be constructed a minimum of one foot beyond the property line. The stub -outs shall be plugged and the end marked with a green painted T-post installed in the ground directly above the location of the plugged end. 4.4.12.3 Cleanouts Cleanouts shall be required on wastewater service lines in accordance with the City standard details and in accordance with plumbing code. 4.4.12.4 Structural Requirements A. Under Roads - All structures and pipe placed under public roads shall be of sufficient strength to support, with an adequate factor of safety, the backfill, road surfacing and H- 20 traffic load per AASHTO Standard Specifications. B. Steep Grades - Concrete anchors w411shall be required in special instances as specified by the City,provided for sewers on slopes of 20% or greater, or where suell anchoragewastewater velocities exceed 15 feet/second. The purpose of the anchors is deemed necessary to prevent pipe movementsecure the sewer against lateral or axial displacement. 4.5 Easements Where sewers cannot be installed in right-of-way, they shall be located within utility easements approved by the City and shall be centered in the easement. All utility easements shall have a minimum width of at least two times the depth to the pipe invert. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet for one utility, 30 feet for two utilities, and 40 feet in width for three utilities. Site -specific circumstances may dictate the need for wider easements. Utility easements and dedicated utility tracts shall be defined by bearings and distances around the perimeter of the easement. Centerline legal descriptions are not acceptable. Page 195 of 239 8-4 Old Business All utility easements shall be for the exclusive use of the City. No permanent structures, (e.g., retaining walls, trees, light pedestals, sign foundations, power poles, mailboxes, sheds, buildings, etc.), shall be placed in the easement. 4.6 Sand/Oil and Grease Interceptors Sand/oil and grease interceptors shall be installed on service lines from commercial and industrial properties discharging oil and grease. The owner shall prepare sizing calculations for the interceptor for City review. At the City's option, the City will size the interceptor. The interceptors shall include a sampling port which extends into a manhole or other City approved structure which causes the discharged fluid to drop vertically at least 3-inches so that a samples may be collected. The connection must be in a location accessible by City inspectors so that samples can be collected, Formatte Page 196 of 239 8-4 Old Business 5.1 Sewage Pump Stations (Lift Stations) and Force Mains 5.1.1 Scope New lift stations are discouraged and shall only be allowed in those locations where there is no feasible way the development can be served by gravity extension of the City's existing wastewater collection system. 5.1.2 Compliance with State of Utah Standards Lift stations shall be designed in accordance with the State of Utah standards, currently located at 1R317-3-3 U.A.C}. Lift stations shall also be design in accordance within the applicable building codes. 5.1.3 City Review and Approval New lift stations must be approved by the City. If approved, the Developer shall submit a utility report with a complete set of design calculations and drawings for review and acceptance by the City. 5.1.4 Flood Protection Lift station structures and the associated electrical and mechanical equipment shall be protected from damage by the 100-year flood, and shall remain fully operational and accessible during such an event. Local, State and Federal regulations pertaining to floodplain shall be satisfactorily accounted for in the design. Grading shall be provided to protect the site by directing surface flows away from the facilities. 5.1.5 Accessibility and Security Lift stations shall be readily accessible by maintenance vehicles during all weather conditions. The facility should be located off the traffic way of streets and alleys. Depending on the nature and location of the facility, security fencing with controlled entry keypads, card -reader access to buildings, security cameras, lockable access hatches, and motion -detection safety lighting may be required. 5.1.6 Grit Where it is necessary to pump wastewater prior to grit removal, the design of the wet well and lift station piping shall receive special consideration to avoid operational problems from the accumulation of grit. 5.1.7 Station Ventilation Adequate ventilation at lift stations shall be provided to mechanically ventilate the dry well, and if screens or mechanical equipment requiring maintenance or inspection are located in the wet well, it shall also be mechanically ventilated. There shall be no inter -connection between the wet well and dry well ventilating systems. In pits over 15 feet deep, multiple inlets and outlets are Page 197 of 239 8-4 Old Business required. Switches for the operation of ventilation equipment should be clearly marked and conveniently located. Consideration should be given to automatic controls where operations may be intermittent. Where excessive moisture or low temperatures are a concern, consideration shall be given to installation of heating and/or dehumidification equipment. 5.1.8 Odor Control Unacceptable levels of odors may be produced at lift stations and within force mains due to excessive hydrogen sulfide generation. Odor control systems are required. 5.2 Minimum Lift Station Design Criteria The following design criteria shall be applicable to lift stations: 1. Lift stations must be equipped with instrumentation and SCADA equipment to collect and transmit all relevant data. 2. Backup electrical power provided by a diesel or natural gas generator with an automatic transfer switch in an all-weather enclosure shall be provided to insure that all lift station components function properly for a period of at least one week in the event that the primary power is lost. Electrical power to the lift station site shall be underground. In addition, an emergency overflow basin shall be provided that will accommodate a minimum 12 hours of storage at the peak daily loading rates. The basin shall be designed and configured to allow for complete draining after an overflow event, either by gravity or submersible sump pumps permanently installed in the basin. 3. Lift stations shall include a wet well sized to reduce the cycling of the pumps and the settling of solids from the flows. 4. A corrosion protection system shall be applied to, and shall completely cover all interior surfaces of wet wells, and any in -line vaults or manholes that precede the wet well. The system shall be specifically designed to protect concrete from hydrogen sulfide corrosion. 5. All lift station wet wells shall be considered an explosion hazard. All electrical equipment and wiring installed therein shall be designed for this hazard. 6. Installation of suitable devices for measuring, recording and totalizing sewage influent and effluent flow and power consumption shall be included. Page 198 of 239 8-4 Old Business 7. The lift station design shall consider changes in flows over the life of the station and allow for proper operation of the station and force main throughout the intended design life. 8. Where high groundwater conditions are possible, buoyancy of the lift station structures shall be evaluated and protected against flotation. 9. The lift station shall include a wet well bypass -to -overflow basin to allow the wet well to be temporarily removed from service for maintenance. 5.3 Pump Equipment and Protection Pumping equipment shall be specifically designed and rated for wastewater service. For wastewater lift stations with an ultimate rated capacity of 1 MGD or less, the City will consider the use of either self -priming pumps in a wet well, or self -priming pumps in a wet well / dry well configuration. For stations with an ultimate capacity in excess of 1 MGD, only a wet well self - priming configuration with the pump located above the wet well and above ground will be accepted. 5.3.1 Pump Characteristics 1. Pumps shall be specifically designed and rated for wastewater service. 2. The design Engineer shall consider pump efficiency in the design with the intent to maximize pumping efficiency and minimize electrical power demand. 3. Wastewater level measurement equipment shall be provided and shall be connected with the City SCADA system. 3. The lift station shall be provided with multiple pump units programmed to alternate sequentially. Should only two units be provided, equal capacity is required, and each pump train shall be capable of handling the peak flow. Pump redundancy is required so that pumps may be taken out of service for maintenance. 4. The station shall be designed such that the number of motor starts per hour shall not exceed 10, or the number of starts recommended by the motor manufacturer, whichever is less. Duplex pump operation and controllers shall be provided such that the lead and lag pump positions are alternated with each successive motor start. 5. Provisions acceptable to the City shall be made to facilitate the removal of pumps, motors, and other mechanical and electrical equipment. Typically, in wet well / dry well stations, a bridge crane shall be provided for removing pumps. In suction lift stations, slide or overhead rails with hoists for removing pumps shall be provided. In wet well stations, rails shall be provided. Page 199 of 239 8-4 Old Business 5.3.2 Pump Protection Pumps handling raw wastewater shall be preceded by approved grinders that are installed to protect the pumps from clogging damage by reducing the particle size of wastewater solids in the flow stream. The grinder shall be located in a lined vault or manhole that precedes the wet well. Grinder pumps may be used in wet well settings for flows less than 1 MGD. 5.4 Overflow Basins Overflow basins for lift stations shall be sized to contain the volume of 12 hours the Average Daily Flow at build -out. The basin shall be designed and configured to allow for complete draining after an overflow event, either by gravity or submersible sump pumps permanently installed in the basin. Basins shall be designed to include a vault or manhole outside the overflow basin to facilitate the complete removal of any liquid that accumulates in the basin, and shall require the installation of a pipe between the basin and vault, with positive slope to the vault. A pump -back or gravity system shall be included in the lift station design to return wastewater to the wet well. 5.5 Force Main Design Criteria 5.5.1 Pipe Materials Force main pipe materials, including restraint devices and fittings, shall be PVC or HDPE. Use of other materials must be approved by the City. 5.5.2 Velocity and Pipe Diameter Sanitary sewer force mains shall be a minimum of 3 inches in diameter. At the design pumping rate (initial and ultimate), the velocity shall be at least 3 feet/second, but not more than 7 feet/second. 5.5.3 Pipe and Design Pressure The force main, joint restraint, thrust blocking, and station piping shall be analyzed and designed to withstand water hammer pressures and associated cyclic reversal stresses that are expected with the cycling of wastewater lift station pumps. Water hammer shall be evaluated for the normal operation of the lift station, as well as for a power outage while the pumps are running. 5.5.4 Shutoff and Check Valves Suitable shutoff and check valves shall be placed on the discharge line of each pump. Check valves shall be suitable for the material being handled and shall be placed on the horizontal portion of discharge piping except for ball checks, which may be placed in the vertical run. Valves shall be capable of withstanding operational design pressures and water hammer. Page 200 of 239 8-4 Old Business 5.5.5 Isolation Valves Isolation valves shall be installed at intervals no greater than 1,000 feet along force mains. 5.5.6 Combination Air Release and Air/Vacuum Valves Combination air release and air/vacuum valves shall be located at force main high points, on pump discharge piping as close as possible to the check valve, and between isolation valves. During the design, the Engineer shall consider the economics of air valve installation against the installation of deeper force main piping. The evaluation shall take into account the installation and long-term maintenance costs of the air valves. The valves shall be specifically designed for wastewater service and be sized per the manufacturer's recommendations. Air valves on force mains shall be contained in a vault and vented above ground. A manually controlled isolation valve suitable for wastewater service shall be installed between the force main and air valve. 5.5.7 Drain Valves When required by the City, the Engineer shall include at least one force main dewatering connection at the lift station and additional drains at other major force main low points. The design shall consist of as few low points along the force main as is practically possible. Drains shall generally include a plug valve installed on a tee and drain piping to an existing sanitary sewer manhole, or to a separate manhole that can then be pumped by City personnel. Provisions shall be made to drain the force main back to the wet well. 5.5.8 Cleanouts Cleanouts shall be provided in the force main at distances not to exceed 500 feet. 5.5.9 Termination Force mains shall transition into the gravity swastewater system at a dedicated manhole. The connection of the force main to the manhole shall be made by connecting the force main to a short section of gravity main stubbed out from the manhole. The gravity stub shall be a size that is equal to or larger diameter pipe than the force main, and shall be installed at an elevation that will prevent wastewater from discharging back into the force main when the gravity system is flowing full. The manhole interior shall be coated for protection against hydrogen sulfide corrosion. The manhole and its opening shall be oversized to permit retrieval of cleaning pigs and ancillary equipment. The manhole at the discharge point shall not be an in -line gravity manhole. 5.5.10 Identification Minimum identification requirements for force mains shall consist of tracer wire and warning tape as required for potable water mains, and green marked polywrap for ductile iron pipe. The warning tape shall be labeled, "Caution: Buried Force Main Below". Page 201 of 239 8-4 Old Business Water System Design Criteria Manual Additions were made to the proposed Water System Design Criteria Manual after the July 11 council meeting. These are shown underlined in the excerpt below. 4.4.15 Water Service Lines All single family residential dwellings, each individual unit in multi -family complexes, including duplexes, and each commercial business, industrial, and irrigation customer shall be served by a separate, independent water service line and meter. The City will consider the use of a single water meter for multi -family complexes if requested by the Developer and if sub -metering of individual units is provided. The effective date shown on the cover of the document was updated to reflect this revision. All other text in this manual remains as submitted for the July 11 council meeting. Page 202 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 5. Accessory Facilities Design 5.1 General 5.1.1 Scope It is not anticipated that developers will be involved in the design or construction of wells, pump stations, storage tanks or water treatment systems. The City will assume the lead design role for these facilities unless otherwise negotiated with a developer. Design of these facilities will be in accordance with the State of Utah Administrative Rules {R309 U.A.C} and the applicable building codes. 33 Page 203 of 239 8-4 Old Business WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL Effective Date: July 18, 2017 Page 204 of 239 8-4 Old Business Table of Contents Contents 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Jurisdiction 1 1.3 Purpose 1 1.4 Amendments and Revisions 1 1.5 Enforcement Responsibility 2 1.6 Review and Acceptance 2 1.7 Interpretation 2 1.8 Relationship to Other Standards 3 1.8.1 State Public Water System Code and Rules 3 1.8.2 State Construction Code 3 1.8.3 NSF International Standards 3 1.9 Variances from these Criteria 3 1.10 Adoption of the Utah American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications 3 1.11 Acronyms 3 1.12 Definitions of Terms 4 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Planning Policy 7 2.3 Design Policy 7 2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy 7 2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy 8 2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy 8 2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy 8 2.8 Duty of the Professional Engineer Preparing Development Documents 9 3.1 Introduction 10 3.2 Review Process 10 3.2.1 Pre -Application Consultation 10 3.2.2 Water Utility Report Requirements 10 3.2.2.1 Format 10 3.2.2.2 Stand -Alone Document 10 i Page 205 of 239 8-4 Old Business Table of Contents 3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy 11 3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies 11 3.3 Acceptance 11 3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction 11 3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report 11 3.4 Preliminary Water Utility Report 11 3.4.1 Water System Modeling 14 3.5. Engineering Department Responsibility 14 3.6 Final Water Utility Report 14 3.6.1 Disclaimer 17 3.7 Construction Drawings 18 3.7.1 Water System Improvements 18 3.7.2 Indemnification Statement 18 3.7.3 Construction Drawing Requirements 18 3.7.3.1 Water Utility Construction Drawings 18 3.8 Record Drawings 20 4.1 Reference Design Documents 21 4.2 Prohibited Installations 21 4.3 Unlawful Connections 21 4.4 Minimum Water System Design Criteria 22 4.4.1. Design Demands 22 4.4.1.1 Fire Flows 22 4.4.2 Storage Requirements 22 4.4.3 Minimum Hydraulic Performance Criteria 22 4.4.3.1 Operating Pressures and Pressure Zone Characteristics 23 4.4.3.2 Location of Pressure Reducing Valves 23 4.4.4 Minimum Distribution Main Sizing and Valve Spacing 23 4.4.5 General Water System Layout Criteria 23 4.4.5.1 Location 23 4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout 23 4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout 24 4.4.6 Pipe Joint Deflection 24 ii Page 206 of 239 8-4 Old Business Table of Contents 4.4.7 Distribution Main Looping 24 4.4.8 Transmission Mains 25 4.4.9 Bored Crossings 25 4.4.10 Appurtenances 26 4.4.10.1 Valves 26 4.4.10.2 Pressure Reducing Valves 27 4.4.10.3 Fire Hydrants 27 4.4.10.4 Thrust Restraint 28 4.4.10.5 Meters and Service Connections 28 4.4.10.6 Fire Protection Service Lines 29 4.4.10.7 Manholes 29 4.4.10.8 Backflow Prevention Assemblies 29 4.4.10.9 Combination Air Release and Vacuum Valves 30 4.4.10.10 Blow -off Pumping Manholes 30 4.4.10.11 Tracer Wire and Warning Tape 30 4.4.11 Fill Areas 30 4.4.12 Trail Access 30 4.4.13 Main -Break Swale Design 31 4.4.14 Future Connections 31 4.4.15 Water Service Lines 31 4.4.15.1 Layout 31 4.5 Easements 32 4.6 Testing and Disinfection 32 5.1 General 33 5.1.1 Scope 33 iii Page 207 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions 1.1 Introduction These criteria and design standards together with all future amendments shall be known as the City of Moab Water System Design Criteria Manual (hereafter called "Criteria"). All utility reports and plans, analyses, and designs, submitted as a requirement of the City of Moab (hereafter called "City") ordinances and resolutions (hereafter called "Regulations"), shall comply with these Criteria. 1.2 jurisdiction These Criteria shall apply to all land within the incorporated area of the City of Moab, or served by the City, including any public lands. These Criteria shall apply to all systems and facilities constructed in or on City Rights -of -Way, easements dedicated for utilities across public or private property, easements for public use, and to all privately owned and maintained system facilities. 1.3 Purpose Presented in these Criteria are the policies and minimum technical criteria for the planning, design and construction of drinking water systems within the boundaries of the City of Moab and areas served by the City. All subdivisions, site plans, or any other proposed development submitted for acceptance by the City shall include adequate and appropriate water system planning, analysis, and design. Such planning, analysis, and design shall conform to or exceed the Criteria set forth herein. Water system planning, analysis, and design that require policies and technical expertise not specifically addressed in these Criteria shall follow the requirements outlined in the Utah Code Annotated, Utah Administrative Code (see {R309 U.A.C.}), industry standards and manufacturer's recommendations. In the event of a conflict, the State of Utah Codes and Administrative Rules will prevail. Interpretation will be provided by the City of Moab and/or the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Drinking Water. 1.4 Amendments and Revisions Policies and criteria may be amended as new technology is developed or if experience gained in the use of these Criteria indicates a need for revision. All technical criteria and policy changes must be reviewed by the City Engineer and Public Works Director or their assignees. All major revisions will require adoption, by resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The City shall monitor the performance and effectiveness of these Criteria and will recommend amendments and revisions as needed. 1 Page 208 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions TABLE 1-1 EXAMPLES OF MINOR AND MAJOR REVISIONS MINOR MAJOR Grammar Policy Changes Submittal Requirements Clarifications Construction Detail Revisions clarification, minor modification for Technical Criteria Changes 1.5 Enforcement Responsibility The Engineering Department and Public Works Department shall review all water system reports, plans, analyses, and designs submitted as a requirement of the Regulations for compliance with these Criteria. The Regulations are enforced by the City of Moab and authorized representatives. 1.6 Review and Acceptance The City shall review all submittals for general compliance with these Criteria. An acceptance by the City does not relieve the Owner, Engineer, or Designer from the responsibility of ensuring that the design, calculations, plans, specifications, construction, and record drawings are in compliance with these Criteria and in compliance with other applicable State and Federal requirements. The City may refer submittals to other agencies that have an interest or responsibility for water system issues. 1.7 Interpretation In the interpretation and application of these Criteria by the City, the provisions herein shall be regarded as the minimum requirements for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Moab. Whenever a provision of these Criteria and any other provision of the Regulations or any provision in any law, ordinance, resolution, rule or regulation of any kind, contains any requirement(s) covering any of the same subject matter, the requirements that are more restrictive or impose higher standards shall govern, as determined by the City. These Criteria shall not abrogate or annul any binding agreements, Development Improvement Agreements, easements, permits, utility reports or construction drawings accepted by the City prior to the effective date of these Criteria. 2 Page 209 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions 1.8 Relationship to Other Standards 1.8.1 State Public Water System Code and Rules Public water systems in the State of Utah are governed by the State of Utah Code Annotated and the Utah Administrative Code. These codes and rules apply to policy, planning, criteria and construction of public water system and prevail if a conflict exists with the Criteria. Most water projects require a submittal to the Utah Divison of Drinking Water for its review. For land development projects, the Developer/Owner shall provide all information needed to complete the review and pay all review and relataed fees. 1.8.2 State Construction Code The State of Utah Construction codes and rules, with amendments, are incorporated by reference. These codes and rules apply to policy, planning, criteria and construction of public water system and prevail if a conflict exists with the Criteria. 1.8.3 NSF International Standards All pipe, valves, fittings, and other water system components that contact water within the public water system shall comply with the applicable standards of NSF International. These include NSF 60 (Water Treatment Chemicals), NSF 61 Annex G, and NSF 372 (Drinking Water System Components). 1.9 Variances from these Criteria Modifications to these Criteria shall require a formal variance request. Variances from the provisions of these Criteria may be considered on a case -by -case basis for specific applications only, and shall not establish a precedent for any other project or future development. 1.10 Adoption of the Utah American Public Works Association (APWA) Standard Plans and Specifications The latest Utah APWA Manual of Standard Plans and Manual of Standard Specifications are hereby adopted as the City of Moab Standard Details and Standard Specifications for water system improvements. Variance from these standards must be approved by the City. In the event that multiple standards apply, the City will determine the applicable standard. 1.11 Acronyms As used in the City's Water Criteria Manual, the following acronyms shall apply: ANSI American National Standards Institute APWA American Public Works Association 3 Page 210 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions ARV ASTM AWWA CD and CDs CFS DIA DIP DIPRA ERC HP Max Min NAVD OSHA PE PRV PSI PVC RCP ROW Combination Air Release/Vacuum Valve American Society for Testing and Materials American Water Works Association Construction Drawing(s) Cubic Feet per Second Development Improvements Agreement Ductile Iron Pipe Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association Equivalent Residential Connections High Point Maximum Minimum North American Vertical Datum Occupational Safety and Health Administration Professional Engineer Pressure Reducing Valve Pounds per Square Inch Polyvinyl Chloride Reinforced Concrete Pipe Right -of -Way 1.12 Definitions of Terms CODE or MUNICIPAL CODE shall mean the City of Moab Municipal Code, as amended. CONSTRUCTION DRAWING(S) (CD or CDs) shall mean construction drawings prepared by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Utah for the Developer and approved by the City depicting public and/or private improvements to be constructed for the Project. ENGINEER shall mean the Professional Engineer retained by the Developer responsible for the creation and submission of utility reports and construction drawings to the City for approval for the purpose of one-time construction of facilities. CRITERIA or DESIGN CRITERIA shall mean the design criteria and requirements contained herein for water facilities to be constructed in the City. DETAILS or STANDARD DETAILS shall mean details issued by the City to be used in Construction Drawings DEVELOPER shall mean the party or parties desiring to construct public and/or private improvements within City rights -of -way or easements, securing all required approvals and permits from the City and other applicable entities, and assuming full and complete responsibility for the Project. 4 Page 211 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (DIA) shall mean a formal agreement between an annexation applicant or Developer and the City that comprehensively addresses development conditions and obligations. EASEMENT shall mean the right of the City to use lands owned by another parry for the purposes of maintenance, access, utilities, drainage or other use, as specified in an agreement. MUNICIPAL CODE — See CODE. OWNER shall mean the person(s) in title to any portion of the Property, according to the records of the Grand County Recorder. The use of the singular "Owner" shall refer to all Owners of the property. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those improvements not identified as public improvements, and which are not generally installed within the City rights -of -way, easements, or other City -owned lands. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER shall mean an individual currently registered with the Utah Division of Professional and Occupational Licensing as a professional engineer. PROJECT shall mean the public or private improvements as designated in the approved construction drawings to be constructed in conformance with these Design Criteria and the City standard specification and details. The project is inclusive of any and all public or private improvement projects for or within the City, whether development projects, private utility projects or capital improvement projects. PROPERTY shall mean the real property located in the City of Moab. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS shall mean those public facilities including, but not limited to, pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian/bike/equestrian paths, storm drain facilities with related appurtenances, culverts, channels, bridges, water distribution, transmission and storage facilities with related appurtenances, wastewater collection facilities with related appurtenances, water purification facilities, pavement markings/ signage/striping, traffic signals and related appurtenances, and those processes integral to construction of other Public Improvements listed herein, which upon their completion are to be dedicated to the City for operation and maintenance by the City and which are installed within the City rights -of -way, easements, or other City -owned lands. REGULATIONS shall mean ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations of the City, including the Code, and other provisions of all zoning, subdivision and building codes or any other applicable design criteria adopted by the City, as the same may be amended periodically and applied uniformly throughout the City. SHALL mean a mandatory requirement or condition, as approved by the City. 5 Page 212 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 1. General Provisions STANDARD DETAILS — See DETAILS. CITY shall mean the City of Moab, Utah CITY COUNCIL shall mean the Moab City Council. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT shall mean the City Engineering Department. CITY ENGINEER shall mean the City of Moab Engineer or other authorized representative of the Engineering Department. VARIANCE REQUEST shall mean a formal request with adequate documentation and justification for a variance from the standards, provisions, policies or submittal requirements set forth in these Design Criteria. WATER MASTER PLAN shall mean the City of Moab Water Distribution and Storage Master Plan 6 Page 213 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 2. Water System Policies 2.1 Introduction Provisions for adequate service, water supply, purification, storage, transmission and distribution are necessary to preserve and promote the general health, welfare, and economic well-being of the residents of the City of Moab. The City of Moab must provide coordination, review, and master planning of the system in order that the integration of each component of the system meets the intent and purpose of the system as a whole. The development of the City's water system is governed by the policies provided below, as facilitated through the implementation of the Criteria contained herein. 2.2 Planning Policy All land developed within the City that is served by the City's public water system shall provide planning and design for indoor and outdoor water demands. Reports and plans shall be submitted for all new development and redevelopment within the City jurisdiction. These reports shall conform to the requirements set forth herein and the provisions otherwise stipulated by the City during the development process. Redevelopment shall be defined as any land disturbance or reconstruction that results in a reconfiguration of existing water system facilities or an increase in demands. During the initial planning stages of the development, a pre -application meeting shall be coordinated with the City of Moab Planning Department. One purpose of this meeting is to assist the City and the developer to determine the level of water service that is available and needed by the developer. 2.3 Design Policy Water system planning and design within the City shall adhere to the Criteria contained herein, the administrative rules promulgated by the Utah Division of Drinking Water, the Utah Division of Water Rights (for wells and water rights), and acceptance procedures of the City of Moab, any applicable watershed protections ordinances, drinking water source protections zones and the applicable water related master plans prepared for the City. Prohibited facilities and connections shall be as described in these criteria. 2.4 Construction of Public Improvements Policy The construction of improvements for and within the City shall conform to the City's construction permit, standard specifications, standard details and approved plans, and shall adhere to all City, County, State, and Federal regulations applicable to the work. This shall include the acquisition of all necessary permits, which may include but not be limited to, stream alteration permits, discharge permits, road cut permits, flood plain related permits and letters 7 Page 214 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 2. Water System Policies (including FEMA review and approval when applicable), Utah Division of Drinking Water approvals, traffic control permits and all other required permits and approvals. At the completion of construction, all permits and service agreements with power companies and any other private utilities shall be transferred into the Customer's name, and shall under no circumstances be transferred to, or held in the name of the City, unless the City is the customer. Any work proposed to take place within existing City of Moab streets must be reviewed and approved by the City. The type of crossing allowed, traffic control, street repair specifications, etc. shall be as determined by the City. Prior to placing the facilities into service and initial acceptance by the City, all construction related provisions required by the City shall be satisfied, including startup procedures, inspections and testing of the facilities, and receipt of O&M Manuals and Record Drawings. Additionally, all requirements and responsibilities of the warranty period will be met. 2.5 Ownership of Public Improvements Policy The delineation between City -owned and privately owned portions of the system and the associated maintenance responsibilities for each, shall be as set forth in the latest editions of the Municipal Code, standard details and previous agreements and policies in effect with the City. Upon execution of final acceptance, the water mains and all appurtenant City -owned facilities, shall become the sole property of the City, and full legal and equitable title thereto shall be vested in the City free and clear of any liens, claims, or rights of any third party in or to the public improvements. 2.6 Operations and Maintenance Policy The design of all water system facilities within the City must provide for access and long-term operation and maintenance of the facilities by the City. Operation and Maintenance manuals associated with all components to be installed as part of the water system shall be provided to the City with the Record Drawings required in these Criteria, unless otherwise specifically waived by the City. Utility easements, dedicated tracts and access easements shall be provided for all water system facilities outside of public right-of-way as set forth in these Criteria, or as otherwise required by the City, and shall be adequate for the operation, maintenance and replacement of the facilities. 2.7 Hazard Minimization and Public Safety Policy Public safety and the protection of City staff shall be an essential objective when planning, designing, constructing, operating and maintaining the City's water system facilities. All such facilities shall be designed with careful consideration of the potential hazards associated with the use and long-term operation and maintenance of the facility. The design phase of all projects 8 Page 215 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 2. Water System Policies shall evaluate the health and safety risks associated with the facilities, and shall include appropriate design features to minimize these risks and to adequately protect the general public and City personnel from the hazards. Equipment for confined space entry in accordance with OSHA and other applicable regulatory agency requirements shall be provided at all City of Moab facilities, as required. Hatches with fall prevention covers, intermediate platforms, handrails, safety lighting, etc. shall be as required by the City, or any applicable code. 2.8 Duty of the Professional Engineer Preparing Development Documents These standards establish criteria and policies for the design and subsequent construction of the City's public water system. These standards are not intended to substitute for engineering knowledge, judgement or experience. It is the responsibility of the design professional engineer to understand and apply sound engineering principals related to public water systems to the planning, design and construction of water system improvements. It is also the responsibility of the design engineer to understand all federal, state and local regulations related to the public water system. These criteria should be reviewed by the developer's engineer, who shall evaluate their applicability. If the design engineer identifies criteria that are inapplicable or inappropriate in a specific location or specific situation, the development engineer shall bring the issue to the attention of the City. 9 Page 216 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements 3.1 Introduction The requirements presented in this chapter shall be used to aid the Engineer or Applicant in the preparation of utility reports, modeling evaluations, and construction drawings for water system facilities. This chapter applies primarily to submittal requirements for water distribution systems and the associated Criteria provided in Chapter 4. The requirements presented herein are the minimum necessary, and will be used to evaluate the adequacy of all submittals made to the City. 3.2 Review Process 3.2.1 Pre -Application Consultation A pre -application consultation with the City of Moab is required for any type of development or redevelopment. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss general information about the project, pertinent aspects of the Criteria, the required scope of the utility reports, and any special procedures, analyses, and submittal requirements that may be applicable. 3.2.2 Water Utility Report Requirements Preliminary and final water utility reports shall be provided to the City of Moab. The purpose of the preliminary water utility report is identify existing water infrastructure, provide preliminary estimates of water demand needs, provide an initial plan for water infrastructure and determine the feasibility of providing water service to the development via the public water system. The purpose of the final water utility report, which is to be submitted with the final construction plans, is to identify the final water infrastructure plan. 3.2.2.1 Format All required reports shall be prepared on 81/2" x 11" paper (maps and figures may be on larger paper) and be bound. Supporting drawings, figures, and tables shall be bound into the reports or included in an attached pocket. Reports shall include a narrative presenting the project for review in accordance with the information presented in these Criteria, and the requirements established by the City for the appropriate submittal. Paper and electronic (PDF) copies of the report shall be provided. Electronic files of computer models and GIS files shall be provided if requested by the City. 3.2.2.2 Stand -Alone Document The water utility reports shall be stand-alone documents. When references are made or assumptions are based on previously submitted reports, the reports must include the appropriate excerpts, pages, tables, and maps containing the referenced information. Assumptions made in previous reports must be verified and substantiated in subsequent reports. Reports shall be legible, or a resubmittal will be required. 10 Page 217 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements 3.2.2.3 Submittal Adequacy Any report with incomplete or missing information shall result in the report being returned without review. The City reserves the right to require additional information beyond that specifically required in these Criteria. 3.2.3 Review by Referral Agencies The review and approval of the project by Federal, State and local agencies other than the City, shall be the responsibility of the Developer. The Developer shall be required to address all referral agency comments, and to have such comments incorporated into the applicable utility report and plans submitted to the City. 3.3 Acceptance 3.3.1 Final Utility Report Required for Construction The final water utility report shall conform to the construction documents to be used to bid the project, and shall be approved by the City prior to the construction of any water system improvements. 3.3.2 Approval Limitation for Final Utility Report The approval of the final water utility report shall expire simultaneously with the expiration of the approval of the project approval unless extended in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. At the time the approval of the final utility report expires, the report shall be deemed invalid and a resubmittal will be required. In order to be re -approved, it must be demonstrated that the concepts, designs, and calculations presented in the report are consistent with the City's current Criteria. 3.4 Preliminary Water Utility Report The Preliminary Water Utility Report shall review and discuss the existing water system infrastructure and the water needs of the development. The report shall also identify the existing infrastructure needed to support the development. The City Engineering Department and Public Works Department will coordinate with the developer to provide needed water system data. The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Preliminary Water Utility Report that shall be submitted: I. TITLE SHEET A. Name of Project, including legal name of development. B. Address. C. Owner. 11 Page 218 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements D. Developer. E. Engineer. D. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable. II. TABLE OF CONTENTS III. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION A. Site Location. 1. Site Vicinity Map. 2. Township, Range, Section, and 1/4 Section. 3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development. 4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments. B. Description of Property and Land Use. 1. Total area in acres. 2. Discussion of project phasing, if applicable. 3. Total number of ERCs proposed for the development at build -out with a breakdown of units by type projected by phase (if applicable) calculated by utilizing the Utah Administrative Code Minimum Sizing Requirements {R309-510 U.A.C.{. 4. Area (acres) and land use for all parcels to be served within the development boundaries (initial and future phases, if applicable) and number of lots if available. 5. Easements/tracts may not be known at this time; however, provide a statement that easements or tracts necessary for utilities will be provided at time of either platting or at time of preliminary site plan, in accordance with City standards regarding location and size of easements and tracts. 6. Major and minor drainage ways and floodplains. 7. Existing irrigation canals or ditches. 8. Significant geologic features and topography. 9. Existing On -Site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS). 10. Existing Drinking Water Source Projection Zones within the project boundary. IV. ESTIMATED DEMANDS A. Average Daily Demands. 12 Page 219 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements Tabulate the Average Daily Demand for the initial and future phases, if applicable. Average Daily Demand shall be provided in both gallons/minute and gallons/day. Indoor and outdoor demands should be included. B. Peak Day Demands 1. Tabulate the Peak Day Demands for the initial and future phases, if applicable. Peak Day Demands shall be provided in gallons/minute. 2. Fixture count estimates shall be prepared in accordance with the International Plumbing Code with amendments as adopted. 3. The developer shall evaluate the type of building construction, and building size and shall recommend a fire flow rate to the City. Final determination will be made by the City Fire Official. The developer shall indicate whether fire sprinklers are included in the building plan. C. Peak Instantaneous Demands 1. Tabulated peak instantaneous demands for the initial and future phases, if applicable, shall be provided. V. EXISTING WATER SYSTEM A. Existing Distribution System. 1. Discuss the existing transmission and distribution lines in the vicinity of the development, including sizes and locations, which will need to be extended to serve the proposed development. 2. Discuss any known shortcomings or bottlenecks associated with the existing distribution system that may impact the City's ability to adequately deliver fire flows and meet the required demand conditions. 3. Discuss existing pressures at the proposed connection points to the existing water system. 4. The City will provide information about the existing water system to the developer in order to discuss the indicated issues. VI. PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM A. Proposed Distribution System. 1. Provide a general overview of the anticipated distribution system for the development, including the proposed line sizes. Describe the tie-ins to the existing water system and the sizes and lengths of any extensions necessary to serve the development. 13 Page 220 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements 2. Discuss looping as required by the City, particularly as it pertains to each successive phase of development anticipated for the project. B. Proposed Supply Facilities 1. Discuss any pump stations, wells, PRVs, storage reservoirs, purification facilities, etc., that will likely be required to adequately serve the development. This shall be done in coordination with the City. VII. POTENTIAL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS General discussion of all foreseeable Federal, State, County, and Local permitting requirements associated with the project. VIII. REFERENCES Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the report. 3.4.1 Water System Modeling The City maintains a water system model. Once the preliminary water system report is received and found to be adequate, the City will determine whether water system modeling is required. If the modeling is required, the City will determine the level of modeling needed for the development and the cost of the modeling. The developer will be responsible for the cost of water system modeling. 3.5. Engineering Department Responsibility If the Engineering Department determines that the Preliminary Water Utility Report meets the requirements set forth in these Criteria and adequate water rights are conveyed to the City, the City will provide water at the designated tie-in points at available pressures. The City is not responsible or liable for assumptions made by the Developer regarding utility information associated with the proposed development. 3.6 Final Water Utility Report The Final Water Utility Report shall describe all final water infrastructure, including finalized modeling and calculations. The following outline sets forth the required minimum content to be provided in the Final Water Utility Report that shall be submitted with the Construction Documents: I. TITLE SHEET 14 Page 221 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements A. Name of Project, including legal name of Development. B. Address. C. Owner. D. Developer. E. Engineer. F. Submittal date and revision dates as applicable. II. TABLE OF CONTENTS III. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION A. Site Location. 1. Site Vicinity Map. 2. Township, Range, Section, and 1/4 Section. 3. Streets, Roadways, and Highways adjacent to the proposed development. 4. Names of surrounding or adjacent developments. B. Description of Property and Land Use. 1. Total area in acres. 2. Discussion of project phasing, if applicable. 3. Total number of ERCs proposed for the development at build -out with a breakdown of units by type projected by phase (if applicable) calculated by utilizing the Utah Administrative Code Minimum Sizing Requirements {R309-510 U.A.C.}. 4. Area (acres), land use for all parcels to be served within the development boundaries (initial and future phases, if applicable) and number of lots. 5. Summary of irrigated area, including open space and park areas (initial and future phases, if applicable). 6. Sizes of schools, commercial and industrial buildings (initial and future phases, if applicable). 7. Major and minor drainage ways and floodplains. 8. Existing irrigation canals or ditches. 9. Significant geologic features and topography. 10. Existing On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems. 11. Existing Drinking Water Source Projection Zones within the project boundary. IV. CALCULATED DEMANDS A. Average Daily Demands. 15 Page 222 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements 1. Tabulate the Average Daily Demand for the initial and future phases, if applicable. Average Daily Demand shall be provided in both gallons/minute and gallons/day. Indoor and outdoor demands should be included. B. Peak Day Demands. 1. Tabulate the Peak Day Demands for the initial and future phases, if applicable. Peak Day Demands shall be provided in gallons/minute. 2. Fixture count estimates shall be prepared in accordance with the adopted plumbing code. 3. The developer shall evaluate the type of building construction, and building size and shall recommend a fire flow rate to the City. Final determination will be made by the City Fire Official. The developer shall indicate whether fire sprinklers are included in the building plan. C. Peak Instantaneous Demands 1. Tabulated peak instantaneous demands for the initial and future phases, if applicable, shall be provided. V. EXISTING WATER SYSTEM A. Existing Distribution System. 1. Discuss the existing transmission and distribution lines in the vicinity of the development, including sizes and locations, which will need to be extended to serve the proposed development. 2. Discuss any known shortcomings or bottlenecks associated with the existing distribution system that may impact the City's ability to adequately deliver fire flows and meet the required demand conditions. 3. Discuss existing pressures at the proposed connection points to the existing water system. 4. The City will provide information about the existing water system to the developer in order to discuss the indicated issues. VI. PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM A. Proposed Distribution System. 1. Provide a general overview of the anticipated distribution system for the development, including the proposed line sizes. Describe the tie-ins to the 16 Page 223 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements existing water system and the sizes and lengths of any extensions necessary to serve the development. 2. Discuss looping as required by the Engineering Department, particularly as it pertains to each successive phase of development anticipated for the project. B. Proposed Supply Facilities 1. Discuss any pump stations, wells, PRVs, storage reservoirs, purification facilities, etc., that will likely be required to adequately serve the development. This shall be done in coordination with the City. VIII. PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND MODELING A. Hydraulic Models. 1. The results of the final hydraulic modeling shall be described. The results of the hydraulic modeling shall be attached to the final water utility report. IX. POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ITEMS Discuss any potential development agreement items such as needed off -site improvements, improvements necessary for a project or project phase to be independently sustainable, water facilities land dedication requirements, etc. X. POTENTIAL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS General discussion of all foreseeable Federal, State, County, and Local permitting requirements associated with the project. XI. REFERENCES Reference all criteria, master plans, reports, or other technical information utilized in the report. 3.6.1 Disclaimer The City is not responsible or liable for assumptions made by the Developer regarding utility information associated with the proposed development. 17 Page 224 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements 3.7 Construction Drawings 3.7.1 Water System Improvements Water system Improvements within public rights -of -way or utility easements are required to be designed, approved, and constructed in accordance with the City's criteria, subdivision requirements of the Municipal Code, the City's standard specifications and details, sound engineering principles, and the conditions of any variances obtained from the City. 3.7.2 Indemnification Statement Construction drawings are reviewed by the City for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the City of Moab for accuracy and correctness of calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed for any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the City for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. 3.7.3 Construction Drawing Requirements In general, construction drawings shall include plan and profile drawings that convey the horizontal and vertical alignment of the improvements, and all other pertinent plans, sections and detailing necessary to construct the proposed facilities. All construction drawings submitted to the City for review, comment, and approval of water system improvements shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Utah. Said Professional Engineer shall be responsible for the information contained on the construction drawings, which shall bear the Professional Engineer's seal prior to final approval for construction. The Developer, Contractor, and Professional Engineer associated with the construction drawings shall be responsible for the adequacy and satisfactory performance of the designs and the installation of all items therein, and any failure or unsatisfactory performance of the system, so constructed, shall not be a cause for action against the City. Approval of the construction drawings by the City signifies only that the construction drawings meet the minimum stipulations of these design criteria and City requirements based upon the information provided to the City by the Professional Engineer and/or Developer, and makes no finding, representation, or warranty that the system and associated components will perform satisfactorily. 3.7.3.1 Water Utility Construction Drawings In addition to the general formatting and information to be included on all sheets of a construction drawing set (e.g., north arrow, scale, project boundaries, lot lines, rights -of -way, tracts, approval blocks, etc.), the following information shall be included on the final Water Utility Plans. 1. Legend: Each sheet shall show the symbols pertaining to the sheet. 18 Page 225 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements 2. Vertical Datum: All elevations used for the planning, design and construction of facilities shall be on the NAVD88 Datum. 3. Horizontal Benchmark and Coordinates: The horizontal benchmark shall be specified. In order to facilitate the Engineering Department's GIS mapping efforts, all basemapping providd to the City shall be placed in the State Plane NAD83, Utah Central Zone Coordinate System and include the coordinates of a known property corner on or adjacent to the site. 4. Plan views shall be oriented so that north is up on the sheet or to the right. 5. Water utility construction notes shall be provided for City review. 6. Overall Water System: In plan view, provide all information and dimensions for horizontal layout of proposed water mains including but not limited to valves, thrust blocks, reducers, tees, bends, crosses, fire hydrants, domestic water service taps, lines and meters, irrigation taps, pressure reducing valves (PRVs), combination air release/vacuum valves (ARVs) and vents, blow -off assemblies, and any other appurtenances that are part of the potable water system. 7. Plan views shall show the locations and sizes of all existing and proposed utility lines and appurtenances (water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, gas, electric, telephone, cable, fiber optic, etc.) on and adjacent to the site. Plan views shall show the location of all existing water wells and On -Site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) on and adjacent to the site. 8. Plan views shall show existing water mains with sizes; valves; domestic and irrigation water service taps, lines and meters; fire hydrants; pressure reducing valves (PRVs); combination air release/vacuum valves (ARVs); and blow -off assemblies on and adjacent to the site. 9. Plan views shall show existing and proposed curb, gutter, and sidewalks; and all existing and proposed strucutures, such as vaults, catch basins, traffic islands, street lights, walls or other permanent structures on and adjacent to the site. 10. Plan views and profiles shall show the tie-ins to the existing water distribution system, including sizes of existing mains. In addition, the nearest water main valves on existing mains shall be shown or, at a minimum, the distance to these valves shall be included on the construction drawings. 11. Plan views and profiles shall show all needed off -site improvements, extensions of service or upgrades to the City's water distribution system. 12. Plan views shall show and label the type and width of all existing and proposed easements that are on and adjacent to the site. 13. Profile drawings are required for off -site construction and all water mains outside of streets. All profile drawings shall include existing and final grade lines. In certain instances, water main profiles may be waived if approved by the City. If a water main profile is waived, then the following information shall be included: 19 Page 226 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 3. Water System Submittal Requirements a. All high points (HP) and low points (LP) along the water mains shall be identified; b. Where required by these Criteria, ARVs, vents and blow -offs shall be shown throughout the water system, with the TOP and BOP elevations provided; and c. All utility crossings shall be identified. 14. Profile views or plan views: Adequate pipe elevation information is required for all utility crossings of water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, gas, electric lines, etc. The following information shall be included: a. Types and sizes of the utility lines at the crossing and the stationing of the crossing; and b. If any pipes at crossing are encased, the coordinates at each end of the encasement, and the type and thickness of the encasements shall be specified. In addition, all utility crossing shall include either: (1) A reference to the sheet where the crossing information is shown; or (2) Top of pipe and bottom of pipe elevations and vertical clearance at the crossing with a callout of "(Min. = 1.5')" wherever the clearance is 2 feet or less. 15. Water System Details: All pertinent details related to water system improvements, such as pipe and fitting restraints, hydrant installations, PRVs, ARVs, blow -off assemblies, utility crossings, trenching, etc., shall be shown on detail sheets on the construction drawings. Where applicable, references to the City standard details may be provided rather than reproducting the City standards in the construction drawings. Specific detail numbers number be referenced with options indicated if applicable. 16. Plan views shall show the boundaries of the City's pressure zones or a note shall be added stating the pressure zone if the entire site is in only one pressure zone. 17. The construction drawings shall contain the following note: "Contractor shall notify the City of Moab Public Works Depar ment of any work that requires shutdown or interruption of service of existing water mains two weeks prior to the proposed shutdown or interruption unless otherwise approved by the City." 3.8 Record Drawings All water system improvements constructed within public rights -of -way and dedicated easements must be formally accepted by the City. The City's acceptance process will confirm that the improvements have been constructed in accordance with the City's current Criteria. 20 Page 227 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria 4.1 Reference Design Documents Primary standards and reference publications pertinent to the design of drinking water facilities within the City of Moab are listed below. Unless otherwise specified, the latest editions shall apply. Utah State Code Annotated Utah Administrative Code {R309{ American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Utah Chapter of the American Public Works Association (Utah APWA) American Water Works Association (AWWA) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association (DIPRA) City of Moab Municipal Code Cross Connection Control Program of Utah (April 2016) 4.2 Prohibited Installations The following installations are prohibited unless otherwise approved by the City. Certain items listed below reference Sections contained in these Criteria that provide the minimum design requirements to be addressed, should a variance be pursued. Private Water Booster Pumps (requires an exception from the Utah Division of Drinking Water) Unmetered Service Connections 4.3 Unlawful Connections No installation of potable water supply piping or part thereof shall be made in such a manner that it will be possible for used, unclean, polluted, or contaminated water, mixtures, or substances to enter any portion of such piping from any tank, receptacle, equipment, or plumbing fixture by reason of back siphonage, suction, back pressure, or any other cause, either during normal use and operation, or when any such tank receptacle, equipment, or plumbing fixture is flooded, or subject to pressure in excess of the main line operating pressure. No person shall make a connection or allow one to exist between pipes or conduits carrying domestic water supplied by the City and any pipes, conduits, or fixtures containing or carrying water, chemicals, liquids, gases, or any other non -potable substance from any other source except as allowed by the Utah Cross Connection Control Program. All connections must be approved by the City. 21 Page 228 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria 4.4 Minimum Water System Design Criteria This section presents the minimum technical criteria for the analysis and design of water systems within the boundaries of the City of Moab, including distribution and transmission mains, water service lines, and the applicable appurtenances associated with these installations. Any special criteria beyond those contained herein, and as determined necessary by the City, shall be discussed at the pre -application consultation. 4.4.1. Design Demands Average daily demands, peak day demands and average annual demands shall be based on the criteria included in the current Utah Administrative Code. This information is currently located at {R309-510-7 U.A.C.}. The City Engineer may adjust the demand values based on the evaluation of actual use data, a current master plan or other conditions determined to affect the safety and welfare of the public. 4.4.1.1 Fire Flows The developer shall develop recommended fire flows based on the currently adopted fire code, the type of construction and the size of construction. This information is currently located in Appendix E of the 2012 International Fire Code. Based on this information, the City Fire Official will determine the fire flow required for each development. 4.4.2 Storage Requirements Storage requirements shall be based on the criteria included in the current Utah Administrative Code. This information is currently located at {R309-510-8 U.A.C.}. The City Engineer may adjust the storage values based on the evaluation of actual use data, a current master plan or other conditions determined to affect the safety and welfare of the public. 4.4.3 Minimum Hydraulic Performance Criteria All mains shall be sized to provide for municipal, irrigation and fire protection demands to all points in the City without violating the pressure criteria set forth herein. The maximum average velocity must be a maximum of 6 feet/second, unless otherwise approved by the City. The minimum and maximum pressures shall be as provided in the following table: Hydraulic Condition Pressure* Peak Day Demand Plus Fire Flow 20 psi min. Peak Instantaneous Demand 30 psi min. Peak Day Demand 40 psi min. No Demand (static) 120 psi max. Exception: Areas of the water system approved before January 1, 2007 must maintain water pressures at the point of connection of 20 psi min. 22 Page 229 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria 4.4.3.1 Operating Pressures and Pressure Lone Characteristics The City of Moab water system included several pressure zones. The developer should consult with the City to determine the range of pressures expected under normal operating conditions. 4.4.3.2 Location of Pressure Reducing Valves If the water pressures within the development are expected to exceed the maximum pressure or if it is anticipated that the development will cause pressures to increase in other areas of the water system, the developer shall install a pressure reducing valve station to reduce pressures. Pressure reducting valves are also required at pressure zone boundaries. The cost of the pressure reducing valve stations for areas of new development will be borne by the developer. 4.4.4 Minimum Distribution Main Sizing and Valve Spacing Water distribution mains shall have a minimum diameter of 8 inches. Isolation valves at locations other than intersections shall be located with a distance between valves of not more than 500 feet, except in residential zones spacing between valves may be 800 feet. The City may approve exceptions in areas of widely scattered customers with no future anticipated development. Isolation valves are required in all directions at junctions, except for branches to fire hydrants. For example, all tees shall have three valves. All crosses shall have four valves. Valves for fire hydrants shall be in accordance with the City standard details. 4.4.5 General Water System Layout Criteria 4.4.5.1 Location All water mains and appurtenances shall be installed in public right-of-way or dedicated utility easements. Water mains shall not be installed parallel to and directly below, any concrete such as sidewalks, trails, curbs, or gutters, and no water manholes or appurtenances shall be located in multi -use trails and sidewalks. Mains shall be located in accordance with the City's standard details, unless otherwise approved by variance from the City. In public streets, water mains shall be located near the shoulder of the road when possible. Otherwise the location should be coordinated with the Cith Water Department. Under no circumstances shall the edge of a main be closer than 5 feet from a gutter pan. Water system layouts in cul-de-sacs shall be in accordance with the City's Standard Details. 4.4.5.2 Horizontal Layout Horizontal separation from potable water mains to storm sewers and sanitary sewers shall be ten feet, edge -to -edge. Horizontal separation from raw (untreated) water lines to storm sewers and sanitary sewers shall be five feet, edge -to -edge. The City must specifically approve any variance from this requirement in the event that it has been determined that it is impossible to maintain the specified horizontal separation distance. 23 Page 230 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria Water mains adjacent to developments shall be designed to extend along the entire frontage of the property to be served, from property line to property line, in order that service will thereupon be available to adjacent Developers or Builders to subsequently extend from in the future. Any off -site water mains necessary to serve the development property shall be extended at the sole expense and obligation of the Developer. Water main alignments in utility easements or tracts between structures (residences, businesses, etc.) shall only be allowed for the purpose of looping a water main at the end of a cul-de-sac, and shall include provisions for a Main -Break Swale as set forth in these Criteria. Under no circumstances shall water mains be installed directly below any concrete such as sidewalks, curbs, or gutters, except at 90-degree angles where crossings beneath the concrete features are required. 4.4.5.3 Vertical Layout The minimum depth of cover for water mains from final grade to the top of the water main shall be 4 feet. The maximum depth of cover for water mains shall be 6 feet from top of pipe to final grade unless associated with a water main lowering in accordance with the City's Standard Details, or as otherwise approved by the City. Under circumstances where a deeper main would eliminate the need for an air valve, mains may be constructed with a cover up to 7.5 feet, and the plans shall note that high points are to be avoided over such a reach. In the event that the water line crosses a sewer line or storm drain line, the water line must be above the sewer line and have a minimum separation of 18 inches. 4.4.6 Pipe Joint Deflection Design of DIP deflections shall be in accordance with the latest edition of AWWA C600 entitled "Installation of Ductile Iron Water Main and their Appurtenances". Design of PVC pipe deflections shall be in accordance with the latest edition of AWWA Manual M23 entitled "PVC Pipe — Design and Installation". Water main joint deflection for DIP and PVC shall not exceed one half of the manufacturer's maximum allowable deflection for the specified pipe diameter and lay length, or one half of the maximum deflection allowed by AWWA, whichever is less. Fittings, bends, or couplings that allow additional angular offset shall be used to achieve gradual alignment changes that exceed the axial joint deflection limits stated herein. 4.4.7 Distribution Main Looping All water systems shall be effectively looped. No dead-end lines will be permitted except lines extending into cul-de-sacs serving no more than 12 single-family residential units or equivalent residential connections (ERCs) and with a length of no more than 400 feet. A fire hydrant shall be placed at the deepest point of any cul-de-sac. 24 Page 231 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria Water quality is a design consideration for any system, and an aging analysis and/or model may be required at the discretion of the City to insure that water quality concerns will not be created as a result of any proposed distribution system layout. Water quality sampling stations may be required by the City at specific locations within new developments to continue to adequately monitor the overall quality of the City's expanding system. Distribution mains shall be PVC pipe in accordance with AWWA C-900 DR 18 or Ductile Iron Pipe Class 350 in accordance with applicable AWWA standards. Other types of pipe material may be approved by the City. 4.4.8 Transmission Mains All water mains 16 inches and larger in diameter shall be classified as "transmission mains", and shall correspond to the sizes established in the latest edition of the City's water distribution and storage master plan. Raw water lines that run between wells and points of disinfection or purification, regardless of size, shall also be considered transmission mains. Air and vacuum release valves shall be installed along transmission mains at all high points and pumping manholes may be required at low points. Temporary blow -off assemblies shall be installed in accordance with the City's Standard Details at all temporary dead -ends along transmission mains. No service connections, including irrigation taps, shall be permitted on a transmission main. Transmission main valves shall be butterfly valves, and shall be required on every branch where two transmission mains connect. Valves shall be installed in accordance with the City's Standard Details and shall be located 10 feet from the connection wherever possible, but shall in no case be less than 5 feet. Maximum valve spacing along transmission mains shall be no more than 1,200 feet, provided there are no intersecting distribution mains. Where distribution mains connect to transmission mains, a gate valve is required on the distribution main, and the goal shall be to locate butterfly valves along the transmission main so that no more than 16 residential units and one fire hydrant will be out of service at any given time, whether for maintenance, or in the event of a water main break. It is the responsibility of the developer to verify compliance with this requirement by considering effective looping, as well as other applicable requirements. Transmission mains shall be PVC pipe in accordance with AWWA C-900 DR 18 or C-905 DR 18 or Ductile Iron Pipe (Cement Morter Lined) Class 350 or Class 250 in accordance with applicable AWWA standards. Other types of pipe material may be approved by the City. 4.4.9 Bored Crossings When a water main passes under a State roadway, an arterial or collector roadway as defined by the City, railroad, drainage way or irrigation ditch, the main shall be located within bored steel casing pipe, unless otherwise allowed to be open cut by the jurisdictional entity being crossed. 25 Page 232 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria The carrier pipe shall be sleeved and sealed within the casing pipe and shall have a minimum of 4 feet of cover to top of casing. The casing pipe shall extend the entire width of the right-of-way or easement of the crossing structure, or as directed by the City or other jurisdictional entity. Valves with appropriate restrained lengths shall be located near each right-of-way or easement line, just beyond the ends of the casing pipe, to provide for the isolation of the main during maintenance or inspection. Crossings at ditches shall include cutoff walls at each side of the crossing, either as required by the jurisdictional entity, or as analyzed and designed by the Engineer at the direction of the City and shall comply with {R309-550-8(8) U.A.C.}. Casing pipe shall be smooth -walled, non -coated pipe of welded steel construction conforming to ANSI/AWWA C200, and shall be seamless or straight seam steel pipe with minimum yield strength of 35,000 psi. The casing pipe shall be constructed of new material and have a minimum wall thickness as follows unless specified otherwise. Carrier Pipe Nominal Diameter Min. Casing Pipe O.D. Min. Wall Thickness* 4" 12" 0.250" 6" 14" 0.250" 8" 16" 0.322" 12" 20" 0.375" *The boring contractor shall determine the necessary casing wall thickness and provided a wall thickness that is greater than included in the above table if needed. Other diameter pipes sizes shall be designed by a professional engineer and submitted to the City of Moab for review. Casing pipe shall be cathodically protected by burying a pair of sacrificial anodes 10 feet from each end of the casing. Anode wires shall pass from the casing pipe to terminal boards inside surface -mounted cast iron lids at each casing end, and then on to the anodes themselves. All anodes shall be buried vertically or horizontally with the top of the anodes set at a depth equal to the casing spring line. Anode pairs shall be offset perpendicularly 5 feet away from the casing pipe, and shall be placed in native soils, not imported backfills. The cathodic protection system shall be designed by competent technical personnel experienced with these types of systems, and shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Long-term maintenance of the system, including anode assessment and replacement, shall be addressed in the submittal. 4.4.10 Appurtenances 4.4.10.1 Valves All water distribution systems shall have valves to ensure that no more than 500 feet of main will be out of service in the event of a single water main break, except for residential area where 800 26 Page 233 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria feet of main may be out of service. Valve placement at water main intersections shall be such that three valves are required at every tee and four valves at every cross. Existing valves may be utilized to satisfy these requirements. Valves shall be the same nominal size as the adjacent pipe. Post indicator valves shall be placed on private fire lines, unless this requirement is waived by the fire official. Valves shall be placed on the branch serving a fire hydrant. Valves shall be located to provide for the extension, pressure testing, and chlorination of new water mains without the disruption of the existing system. Additional valves shall be considered by the developer to minimize inconveniences and safety hazards during repairs at critical locations within the system, and to provide for the ability to conduct water quality monitoring and alleviate water quality concerns that may be reasonably anticipated. Valves up to 12 inches shall be resilient seated gate valves which meet requirements of AWWA C-509. Valves 14 inches and larger shall be butterfly valves, with valve operators located on the north and east sides of the mains. Under no circumstances shall a valve be located in concrete, such as sidewalks, cross pans, aprons, curbs, or gutters. Valves shall meet requirements of AWWA C- 504. Valve boxes shall be in accordance with City Standard Details and shall be brought up to grade at the time of pavement placement or overlay. Any valve located in an unpaved area shall have a reinforced concrete collar around the valve box and the accompanying marker. Temporary dead -ends on any water main shall include a temporary blow -off. Dead -ends on lines that will not be extended shall be provided with permanent hydrants at the terminus of the dead end. 4.4.10.2 Pressure Reducing Valves Pressure -reducing valve (PRV) installations are used to control and maintain pressure between distribution pressure zones, and shall be installed at locations determined by the City. Downsizing of the main shall not be allowed at the valve, unless approved by the City. The City shall determine the PRV pressure settings necessary to maintain the City's pressure zones, shall be present when PRVs are put into service, and shall inspect these facilities. 4.4.10.3 Fire Hydrants Fire hydrant spacing and proximity to structures shall be as required by the latest version of the State of Utah adopted fire code, however spacing between hydrants at and adjacent to the project shall not exceed 500-feet. The distance between fire hydrants shall be measured along an unobstructed path. All hydrants shall be installed to conform to the grade and alignment shown on the plans. 27 Page 234 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria All fire hydrant locations will ultimately be subject to the approval of the City Fire Chief. Hydrants shall be placed as shown in the City's Standard Details within the right-of-way or in a utility easement. Wherever possible, hydrants shall be located on the same side of the street as the water main, unless otherwise directed by the City. Preference shall be given to locating hydrants near street corners, rather than to locations near streetlights. Hydrants shall be located at the end of every cul-de-sac. When hydrants are to be installed at locations other than street intersections, they shall be located at the extension of property side lot lines. In no case shall a hydrant be located closer than 5 feet to obstructions, driveways, etc., and no closer than 10 feet from a curb inlet. Fences, landscaping, etc., shall in no way hinder the operation of the fire hydrant. Fire hydrant lateral lines shall be set at 90 degrees to mains and shall be no more than 70 feet in length between the hydrant and the main. Tap shall not be made on a hydrant lateral. The make and model of the installed fire hydrants must be approved by the Public Works Department. 4.4.10.4 Thrust Restraint All bends, tees, crosses, wyes, plugs, dead -ends, wet taps (in certain cases), hydrants, blow -offs and other fittings with unbalanced thrust forces shall be designed and constructed with concrete thrust blocks in accordance with the City's Standard Details. If the soil -bearing capacity is unknown, it shall be assumed to be 2,000-pounds/square foot in determining the appropriate size of the thrust block. In addition to thrust blocks, joints shall be mechanically restrained for the required distances from valves and fittings. The entire length of fire hydrant lines and fire service lines, as well as pipe in fill areas, shall be restrained. 4.4.10.5 Meters and Service Connections All service connections shall be metered. In general, residential and commercial meters shall be installed within the public right of way and shall conform to the City Standard Drawings. Fire lines are not considered service connections for this requirement and don't require a meter. All meters connected to the City's water distribution system shall be the property of the City. Under no circumstances shall anyone other than City personnel remove a water meter once the pit, vault, or authorized inside installation has been inspected and approved. No connections shall be made in the meter pit other than those directly related to the meter and bypass. Single- family residential irrigation system connections shall be made downstream from the meter and double check backflow prevention assembly. All other uses require irrigation service connections separate from the domestic service connection. Maximum design flows through meter shall be limited to 80% of the maximum rate flow. The continuous flow shall be limited to 50% of the maximum rated flow. In all cases, the maximum 28 Page 235 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria and minimum flows shall be within the flow range and performance requirements of the meter manufacturer. For all water meter installations, detailed drawings of the proposed installation, indoor and outdoor water use volumes and flowrates and water fixture unit counts shall be included as an integral part of the plans submitted to the City for review. There shall be no electrical wiring allowed in any water meter pit or vault unless authorized in writing by the City. Fixture unit counts for residential, commercial or industrial use shall be determined by a Professional Engineer in accordance with the procedures set forth in plumbing code, and as approved by the City. 4.4.10.6 Fire Protection Service Lines Fire service lines shall be ductile iron (3-inch diameter and larger) or type K copper (2 inch diameter and smaller) from the main to the backflow prevention assembly unless approved by the City Fire Department. All fire service lines shall be fully restrained in their entirety. The customer/owner shall own and maintain all private fire service lines from the tap on the main to the building. All fire sprinkler taps shall be installed with a backflow prevention assembly approved by the City and as required by the latest edition of the Utah Cross - Connection Control Manual. A flow switch shall be provided on the riser that indicates whether or not water has flowed through the line. Tapping these lines for fire hydrants, domestic water, and/or any other purpose shall not be permitted. Commercial properties requiring a domestic service line and a fire protection service line shall have separate taps for each. Fire protection service lines and fire depar anent connection (FDC) locations shall be included on the Construction Drawings. FDCs are to be freestanding in a location approved by the Fire Official and shall be constructed as required by the Fire Official. 4.4.10.7 Manholes Manholes shall be installed in conjunction with all air release vaults in accordance with the City's Standard Details. Manhole lids shall not be aligned with vehicle wheel paths, or within 2 feet either direction of the street crown. 4.4.10.8 Backflow Prevention Assemblies To prevent backflow contamination of the City's potable water mains, a backflow prevention assembly shall be installed where pressures downstream of the water meter could exceed those in the main, and where any unsafe water or contaminated materials could be discharged, or drawn into the potable water system under a condition of back-siphonage. The assembly shall be placed downstream of the water meter and shall be installed and tested in accordance with City's Cross Connection Control Program. The assemblies shall meet the most restrictive requirements set forth in the latest editions of the City of Moab and State of Utah Cross -Connection Control Programs, and shall further meet the requirements of the adopted plumbing codes. Backflow 29 Page 236 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria prevention assemblies shall be installed and located to provide for proper operation of the device, and easy access for annual testing and maintenance. Determination of the particular device shall be at the discretion of the Public Works Department. All service connections, including irrigation and fire line connections, shall require backflow prevention. 4.4.10.9 Combination Air Release and Vacuum Valves Combination air relief valves and vaults shall be located at all high points in the transmission and distribution system in accordance with the City's Standard Details. 4.4.10.10 Blow -off Pumping Manholes In accordance with the City's Standard Details, a pumping manhole shall be installed at all low points on transmission mains. 4.4.10.11 Tracer Wire and Warning Tape Tracer wire shall be affixed to the top of all water mains regardless of pipe material and terminated in test stations located behind each fire hydrant or in valve boxes. The maximum distance between test stations or tracer wire boxes shall be 500 feet. Warning tape shall be installed one foot above the top of pipe on all water mains, regardless of pipe material. 4.4.11 Fill Areas Where water mains will be constructed in fill areas, all fill materials shall be placed and compacted to final grade prior to the installation of the water main and appurtenances. All fill material shall meet the City's standards and be approved by the City. Water mains within fill areas shall have restrained joints in accordance with these Criteria. 4.4.12 Trail Access Where water mains cannot be located in public right-of-way, the facilities shall be located in areas that allow direct access by maintenance vehicles. Proposed trails to be used to access water mains and appurtenances must meet the following requirements, and shall be submitted for review and approval by the City: 1. The longitudinal slope must not exceed 10% and the cross slope must not exceed 4% unless approved by the City. 2. The Parks Department must approve this use. 3. The width of the drivable surface shall be a minimum of 10 feet for a straight portion of trail and at least 12 feet wide for curved portions, depending on the curve radii. A shoulder may be required. 4. The trail shall be designed to support an AASHTO HS-201oad. 5. The trail must be in a utility, public access or trail easement a minimum of 20 feet wide. 30 Page 237 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria Information regarding the width, type and depth of material specified for trails to be used to access water system facilities shall be submitted for review by the City, and shall include acknowledgement from the Parks Department that utility access is approved for the particular trail. 4.4.13 Main -Break Swale Design All water mains to be constructed between structures (residences, businesses, etc.) must have a "main -break" swale or channel that provides adequate capacity in the event of a water main break. The swale must be located in a dedicated open space or utility tract maintained by the Owner. 4.4.14 Future Connections A temporary blow -off assembly, is required at the terminal end of any water main that is to be extended in the future. Such discontinued mains shall have valves located such that only a single valve will need to be closed when the main is extended. Joints shall be restrained an adequate distance from the valve per the City's Standard Details to ensure that the valve will not blow off when the line is exposed for extension. No service taps shall be allowed between the isolation valve and the dead end on any main that may be extended in the future. 4.4.15 Water Service Lines All single family residential dwellings, each individual unit in multi -family complexes, including duplexes, and each commercial business, industrial, and irrigation customer shall be served by a separate, independent water service line and meter. The City will consider the use of a single water meter for multi -family complexes if requested by the Developer and if sub -metering of individual units is provided. 4.4.15.1 Layout The Developer shall install a service line stub -out from the water main to each individual lot, including the corporation stop valve and meter box. Where sidewalks are proposed, the stub -out shall be constructed to five feet beyond the back of the sidewalk. Where sidewalks will not be constructed, the stub -out shall be constructed a minimum of one foot beyond the property line. The stub -outs shall be plugged and the end marked with a blue painted T-post installed in the ground directly above the location of the plugged end. All service line sizes and locations shall be shown on the water system Construction Drawings to be approved by the City. The services shall be constructed as shown on the construction drawings unless otherwise approved in writing by the City. The stationing, length, size and direction of the service line shall be shown in plan view on the construction drawings. 31 Page 238 of 239 8-4 Old Business Chapter 4. Water System Design Criteria 4.5 Easements Where mains cannot be installed in right-of-way, they shall be located within utility easements approved by the City and shall be centered in the easement. The minimum easement width shall be 20 feet for one utility. The width of easements which include more than one utility will be determined by the City. Site -specific circumstances may dictate the need for wider easements. Utility easements and dedicated utility tracts shall be defined by bearings and distances around the perimeter of the easement. Centerline legal descriptions are not acceptable. The main shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from and parallel to the edge of the utility easement. All meters and fire hydrants not installed within the right-of-way will require an easement dedication 10 feet wide and extending 3 feet behind the meter or hydrant. If the meter or hydrant easement is longer than 10 feet, the width of the easement shall be a minimum of 20 feet. Fire hydrants and meters shall be centered in all such easements. All utility easements shall be for the exclusive use of the City. No permanent structures, (e.g., retaining walls, trees, light pedestals, sign foundations, power poles, mailboxes, sheds, buildings, etc.), shall be placed in the easement. Where it is necessary to locate a water main along back lot lines, the main shall be offset a minimum of 10 feet from the lot line, and the alignment shall be specifically approved by the City to provide reasonable access for maintenance crews. 4.6 Testing and Disinfection All distribution and transmission lines, and all other piping and fittings shall be flushed, pressure and leak tested and disinfected. After disinfection, bacteriological samples shall be taken from the lines. Pressure testing shall be in accordance with AWWA Standard C600-10. Disinfection and bacteriological testing of facilities shall be in accordance with AWWA Standard C651-05. Water lines and facilities shall not be connected to the public water system until the bacteriological tests indicate that the water is free from contamination. 32 Page 239 of 239 8-4 Old Business