HomeMy Public PortalAbout02 February 9, 2000 CommissionRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 6762
MEETING AGENDA
TIME: 9:30 a.m.
DATE: Wednesday, February 9, 2000
LOCATION: Naval Warfare Assessment Center
Lake Norconian Pavilion
2300 Fifth Street
Norco, California
Commissioners
Chairman: Tom Mullen
Vice Chairman: William G. Kleindienst
Bob Buster, County of Riverside
John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside
James A. Venable, County of Riverside
Roy Wilson, County of Riverside
Tom Mullen, County of Riverside
John Hunt / Michael Bracken, City of Banning
Gerald Zeller, City of Beaumont
Robert Crain / Gary Grimm, City of Blythe
John M. Chlebnik / Gregory V. Schook, City of Calimesa
Gene Bourbonnais / Cora Sue Barrett, City of Canyon Lake
Gregory S. Pettis / Sarah DiGrandi, City of Cathedral City
Juan M. DeLara / Richard Macknicki, City of Coachella
Andrea M. Puga / Karen E. Stein, City of Corona
Greg Ruppert / Jerry Pisha, City of Desert Hot Springs
Robin ReeserLowe / Lori Van Arsdale, City of Hemet
Percy L. Byrd / Conrad Negron, City of Indian Wells
Mike Wilson / Marcos Lopez, City of Indio
John J. Pena / Ron Perkins, City of La Quinta
Kevin W. Pape / Robert L. Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore
Frank West / Bill Batey, City of Moreno Valley
Jack F. van Haaster, City of Murrieta
Frank Hall / Harvey Sullivan, City of Norco
Dick Kelly / Robert Spiegel, City of Palm Desert
William G. Kleindienst / Stan Barnes, City of Palm Springs
Daryl Busch / Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris
Donald F. Yokaitis, City of Rancho Mirage
Ameal Moore, City of Riverside
Patrick Williams / Chris Carlson-Buydos, City of San Jacinto
Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula
Director Stan Lisiewicz, Caltrans District #8
Eric Haley, Executive Director
Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director
Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the
Commission, please complete and submit a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Commission.
11.36.00
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION
AGENDA*
"Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda
NAVAL WARFARE ASSESSMENT CENTER
LAKE NORCONIAN PAVILION
(See Map Attached)
2300 FIFTH STREET, NORCO, CA
9:30 a.m.
Wednesday, February 9, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. COMMISSIONERS SELF INTRODUCTIONS
3. PRESENTATIONS
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (For items not listed on the agenda)
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - January 12, 2000
6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after
making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that
the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the
Agenda. An action adding an item to the Agenda requires a 2/3 vote of the
Commission, or if less than 2/3 of the Commission members are present, a
unanimous vote.)
7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a
single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s).
Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the
agenda.
7A. FEDERAL APPROPRIATIONS Page 1
Overview
This item is to recommend that staff and federal advocates be directed to work
on securing Congressional Appropriations for the listed projects.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
February 9, 2000
Page 2
7B. AWARD DESIGN CONTRACT NO. RO-2042 FOR STATE ROUTE 60 HOV
LANES Page 3
Overview
This item is to recommend award of Design Contract No. RO-2042 to Holmes
and Narver Infrastructure for Final PS&E Design Services for State Route 60
HOV Lanes (I-215/SR 60 Interchange to Redlands Boulevard).
7C. CONSOLIDATION OF ROUTE 74 DESIGN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
BETWEEN CALTRANS AND RCTC Page 15
Overview
This item is to recommend: 1) approval of the attached form of Agreement with
Caltrans; 2) authorize the Executive Director to make any negotiated changes
required; and 3) authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement, pursuant to
RCTC legal counsel review.
7D. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT RO-9860 UPDATING RESPONSIBILITIES
RELATED TO STATE ROUTE 74 RE -ALIGNMENT IMPACTS Page 32
Overview
This item is to recommend: 1) approval of Amendment No. 1 to Contract RO-
9860 with White Rock Acquisition Co., LP updating RCTC and property owner
responsibilities related to State Route 74 realignment impacts on the future
Ramsgate Development; 2) authorize the Executive Director to negotiate the
deal points for this amendment; and 3) authorize the Chairman to execute this
amendment, pursuant to RCTC legal counsel review.
7E. REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY PLATFORM AT DOWNTOWN RIVERSIDE
METROLINK STATION Page 37
Overview
This item is to recommend approval to obtain bids for the removal of the
temporary platform and the reinstallation of the safety fencing between tracks
at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
February 9, 2000
Page 3
7F. AMENDMENT TO FY 2000-2004 MEASURE "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Page 39
Overview
This item is to recommend approval of an amendment to the FY2000-2004
Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for the County of Riverside.
7G. SB 821 PROGRAM EXTENSION REQUESTS FROM THE CITY OF BANNING AND
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Page 85
Overview
This item is to recommend approval of the requests from the City of Banning
and County of Riverside for an extension of time to March 30, 2000 to
complete their SB821 Projects.
7H. AGREEMENT WITH DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL FOR
OPERATION OF THE FREEWAY CALL BOX SYSTEM Page 87
Overview
This item is to recommend: 1) approval of an attached agreement, subject to
Legal Counsel review, with the State of California, Department of California
Highway Patrol, for the operation of the freeway call box system; and 2)
authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission.
71. CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) CLEAN FUELS
OPPORTUNITY FUND CALL FOR PROJECTS Page 163
Overview
This item is to recommend approval of the CMAQ Clean Fuels Opportunity Fund
Call for Projects announcement and application process.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
February 9, 2000
Page 4
7J. SOCIAL SERVICE TRANSPORTATION INVENTORY REPORT AND ACTION PLAN
Page 199
Overview
This item is to recommend adoption of the December, 1999 Social Service
Transportation Inventory and Action Plan and approve submittal to Caltrans.
7K. REQUEST FOR MEASURE A WESTERN COUNTY SPECIALIZED TRANSIT
CAPITAL MATCHING FUNDS Page 258
Overview
This item is to recommend approval of Care -A -Van Transit System, Inc. (Care -
A -Van) and Transportation Specialist, Inc. (TSI) requests to provide 20% match
funds for the purchase of equipment through the Section 5310 grant process.
7L. TRANSIT NEEDS PUBLIC HEARING Page 262
Overview
This item is to recommend holding a public hearing in the City of Blythe on
March 2, 2000 to receive testimony on unmet transit needs in the Palo Verde
Valley and that the Commissioners attending the hearing be designated as the
official hearing board. It is requested that Commissioners attending the hearing
notify the Clerk of the Board.
7M. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT Page 263
Overview
This item is to receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the
month ending December 31, 1999.
7N. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Page 267
Overview
This item is to receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report as of
December 31, 1999.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
February 9, 2000
Page 5
70. 1999 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT AND AUDIT FINDINGS
Page 269
Overview
This item is to receive and file the 1999 Comprehensive Annual Report and the
1999 Audit Results from the auditors.
7P. RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Page 270
Overview
This item is to receive and file the Rail Program update for December, 1999.
8. STRATEGIC PLAN PHASE I REVIEW AND UPDATE 15 Minutes Page 271
Overview
This item is to recommend: 1) approval of the Phase I Report; 2) identify actions on
critical issues; and, 3) direct staff to proceed with Phase II Proposed Expenditure Plan
for 2009-2029.
9. PROGRAMMING OF STIP RESERVES TO THE ROUTE 60/215 TRUCK CLIMBING LANE
PROJECT AND REPROGRAMMING OF CMAQ FUNDS TO THE SR 60 HOV LANE
PROJECT 10 Minutes Page 272
Overview
This item is to recommend approval of:
1. Programming of $7.2 million in Regional Improvement Program funds to the
Route 60/215 Truck Climbing Lane, and
2. Reprogramming of $7.24 million in Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Funds
from the Route 60/215 Truck Climbing Lane Project to the SR 60 High
Occupancy Vehicle Lane project in Moreno Valley.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
February 9, 2000
Page 6
10. STIP AMENDMENT ON THE SR 91 AUXILIARY LANE PROJECT BETWEEN MAGNOLIA
AND MARY STREETS 10 Minutes Page 273
Overview
This item is to recommend approval of the following three actions, which are
dependent on receipt of the Transportation Operation Strategy "TOPS" funds:
1. Reprogramming of $3.345 million in Regional Improvement Program funds and
$9.155 million in Measure A funds from the SR91 Auxiliary Lane project,
between Magnolia Avenue to Mary Street, to the SR 74 project;
2. Programming of $12.5 million in Measure A funds expected to be available in
FY2004 to the SR 91 HOV Project - Mary Street to Mission Inn Avenue;
3. Reprogramming of $12.5 million in Regional Improvement Program funds from
the SR 91 HOV Project - Mary Street to Mission Inn Avenue to the SR 71 /91
Interchange Project, contingent upon programming of ITIP funds for
construction; and,
4. That the Committee approve applying to the CTC for a time extension on the
$3.345 million in Regional Improvement Program funds. This action facilitates
the potential for TOPS funding.
11. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 5 Minutes
Overview
The Executive Committee, at their meeting on Wednesday, February 9, 2000 - prior
to the Commission meeting, will discuss the membership terms of office, proposed
membership change and the proposed Administrative Code amendments. An oral
report will be presented by the Chairman to the Commission and selection of area
representatives is scheduled to be held at this meeting.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
February 9, 2000
Page 7
12. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
13. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
Overview
5 Minutes
This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director
to report on attended meetings/conferences and issues related to Commission
activities.
14. CLOSED SESSION - Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation Pursuant to
Section 54956.9(a) - NOTE: CLOSED SESSION, IF NEEDED, WILL BE HELD AT
NORCO CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM, 2870 Clark Avenue, Norco.
Name of Parties:
Riverside County Transportation Commission v. State of California
Department of Transportation, California Private Transportation
Company
Case Number: 336963
15. ADJOURNMENT
The March Commission meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 8. 2000, at the
University of California Chancellor's Conference Room, 1201 University Avenue,
#207, Riverside, California 92507.
Lake Norconian Pavilion
Site of the
February 9, 2000
Meeting of the
Riverside County Transportation Commission
SIXTH STREET
FOURTH STREET
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
January 12, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER.
Chairman Jack van Haaster called the meeting of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission to order at 9:30 a.m. at the UCR Chancellor's Conference Room, 1201
University Avenue, Suite 207, Riverside, California 92507.
Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent
Bob Buster
Percy L. Byrd
John M. Chlebnik
Juan M. DeLara
Frank Hall*
John Hunt
Dick Kelly
William G. Kleindienst
Jan Leja *
Stan Lisiewicz*
Robin Reeser Lowe
Ameal Moore
Tom Mullen
Kevin Pape
John J. Pena
Gregory S. Pettis
Andrea M. Puga
Ron Roberts
Greg Ruppert
John F. Tavaglione
Jack van Haaster
James A. Venable
Frank West
Patrick A. Williams
Michael Wilson
Roy Wilson
Donald F. Yokaitis
* Arrived after start of meeting
2. COMMISSIONERS SELF INTRODUCTIONS
A roundtable self introductions followed.
3. PRESENTATIONS
None.
Gene Bourbonnais
Daryl Busch
Robert Crain
RCTC Minutes
January 12, 2000
Page 2
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
❑ Garry Grant, Meadowbrook, expressed his thanks to the County, Ca!trans and
RCTC for efforts in the installation of a traffic signal at River Road. He then
presented a petition which contained approximately 200 signatures of residents in
the area on the conditions of Highway 74 and statistics on fatalities (51 over 10
years) and accidents (1000) statistics.
❑ Corky Larson, Executive Director of the Coachella Valley Association of
Governments (CVAG), provided copies of CVAG's annual Transportation Unified
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) report and to contact her if they had any questions.
5. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
M/S/C (ReeserLowe/Buster) to nominate Commissioner Tom Mullen for Chairman.
Commissioner Tom Mullen was unanimously elected as RCTC's Chairman.
M/S/C (Yokaitis/Hunt) to nominate William Kleindienst as Vice Chairman.
Commissioner Kleindienst was unanimously elected as RCTC's Vice Chairman.
At this time, the newly elected Chairman, Tom Mullen, assumed the Chair. Chairman
Mullen made comments to the fine example that Jack van Haaster has set as Chairman of
the Commission, especially at a time when the expanded Commission membership was
started. On behalf of the Commission, he presented Jack van Haaster a plaque and
thanked him for his outstanding work.
Commissioner Robin Lowe also commended Jack van Haaster for the outstanding job that
he did for the Commission, not only as the RCTC Chair but also for representing the
Commission in New York placing RCTC in a good position in the bond market, and for
leading the Commission through a difficult meeting in November.
Commissioner Andrea Puga echoed Commissioner Lowe's statements and recognized the
outstanding job Commissioner van Haaster did.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - December 8, 1999
M/S/C (Byrd/Venable) approve the minutes of the December 10, 1999, meeting, as
presented.
7. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS
It was determined to take Item #12 immediately after the Consent Calendar.
RCTC Minutes
January 12, 2000
Page 3
8. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single
motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled
from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.
M/S/C (Wilson/Puga) to approve the following Consent Calendar items.
8A. TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS
Approve the recommended list of projects and direct staff to include these projects
in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
88. AMENDMENT TO FY 1999 - 2000 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FOR THE
COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM AND RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES AND REVISED
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF) AND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA)
FUND ALLOCATIONS
Approve: 1) An amendment to the Commuter Rail Program FY 1999-2000 Short
Range Transit Plan (SRTP); 2) The revision of the FY 1999/00 Local Transportation
Fund (LTF) allocation to the Commuter Rail Program; 3) The revision of the FY
1999/00 State Transit Assistance Fund allocations in Riverside County as presented
on the included in the memorandum; and, 4) The adoption of Resolution No. 00-
001, "A Resolution of The Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate
State Transit Assistance Funds"
8C. LA SIERRA METROLINK STATION TEMPORARY PARKING LOT
Authorize staff to advertise the construction bid package for a temporary parking
lot adjacent to the existing La Sierra Metrolink Station.
8D. FY 2001 AND 2002 SPECIALIZED TRANSIT TWO-YEAR CALL FOR PROJECTS
Authorize staff to release a two-year call for Projects for Specialized Transit
covering western Riverside County, appoint a Commission representative to be
seated on the Evaluation Committee and reserve funding to support matching of
Section 5310 federal capital grants.
8E. AWARD OF CONSULTANT CONTRACT FOR MANAGEMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF RCTC'S COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
1) Award a consultant contract for an 18 month period with two -one year
extension options to Inland Transportation Services, Inc. in an amount not to
exceed the negotiated price for the management and implementation of RCTC's
Commuter Assistance Program, and 2) Authorize RCTC's Chairman to executive the
agreement on behalf of the Commission.
RCTC Minutes
January 12, 2000
Page 4
8F. MEASURE "A" PARK AND RIDE LEASE - LAKE ELSINORE
Authorize: 1) The leasing of 50 Park and Ride spaces at 17600 Collier Avenue,
Lake Elsinore, California; and, 2) RCTC's Chairman to execute the agreement on
behalf of the Commission
8G. REVIEW OF SECURITY SERVICES AND CONTINUATION OF CONTRACT
Approve the continuation of RCTC's contract for security guard services with Group
70 Protective and Investigative Services through June 30, 2000
8H. TRANSIT BUS TICKETS FOR COUNTY JURORS
Receive and file the report on Transit Bus Tickets for County Jurors
81. FY1999/2000 BEACH TRAIN PROGRAM
Approve the proposed Beach Train Program for FY 2000/01, consisting of up to
seventeen dates between June and October, including the commitment to
underwrite costs of service beyond fare revenues.
8J. AUDIT OF CALL BOX SYSTEM MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-99
Receive and file the Audit of Call Box System Maintenance Costs for Fiscal Year
1998-99
8K. MONTHLY COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT
Receive and file the Monthly Cost and Schedule Report.
8L. CHAIR APPOINTMENT TO COMMITTEES AND AGENCY BOARDS AND
COMMITTEES
Appointment requests will be forwarded to the Chair for action.
9. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Steve DeBaun, RCTC Legal Counsel, briefly described that the purpose of the public
hearing was to receive comments regarding the acquisition of real property, by eminent
domain, for a project to construct safety improvements consisting of a traffic signal,
located at the intersection of Greenwald/Meadowbrook Avenue and Route 74 in the
County of Riverside.
At this time, Chairman Mullen opened the public hearing.
RCTC Minutes
January 12, 2000
Page 5
D Norm Gritton, 27245 Highway 74, Perris, informed the Commission that he
previously spoke with Janet Parks, County of Riverside, that they are awaiting
signatures from a couple of out-of-town owners.
Chairman Mullen hearing or seeing no one else wishing to present testimony, the
public hearing was closed.
M/S/C (Pape/Buster) to adopt Resolution No. 00-002, "A Resolution of the
Riverside County Transportation Commission Declaring That the Acquisition
of Fee Interests in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County,
California, More Particularly described as APNS 349-080-001 & 002, By
Eminent Domain is Necessary For the Construction of a Traffic Signal at the
Intersection of Greenwald/Meadowbrook Avenue and State Route 74".
10. CLOSED SESSION - Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation Pursuant to Section
54956.9 (al
Name of Parties:
Riverside County Transportation Commission v. State of California
Department of Transportation, California Private Transportation
Company
Case Number: 336963
There were no announcements.
11. CETAP - WORKING PAPER #3 "EVALUATION OF CORRIDORS" AND
"RECOMMENDATIONS ON CORRIDORS TO MOVE FORWARD TO CETAP PHASE II"
Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director, informed the Commission that they are in the
final stage of identifying corridors (narrowed to four corridors) for Phase II. In the next
phase, two of the corridors will be recommended as Tier I ERI status. Considerable
progress have been made in obtaining funding going from a $5.5 million deficit to $2.4
million deficit. An additional commitment of $850,000 was received within the last six
months.
Steve Smith of Transcore, RCIP (Riverside County Integrated Plan) Consultant, explained
that as important to the future transportation within the County as well as identifying the
the corridors are the circulation elements of the various general plans and arterial system,
the need for the entire network to work together. Attracting jobs to the County will
reduce some of the pressures on the intercounty roadways.
Commissioner Lowe indicated that this was an interesting process and that the participants
to the process have been concentrated and intense about the direction to proceed with
this project. One of the philosophies in identifying corridors was, if a corridor was
constructed, how many trips would it eliminated from the current corridor. For example,
if the Banning to Temecula corridor were built, how many trips would it alleviate through
RCTC Minutes
January 12, 2000
Page 6
the 10 and 60 to Moreno Valley and Riverside. Part of the emphasis and major thrust of
everyone's evaluation, was how many trips were eliminated off the 91 if there was
another corridor to travel west, and off of the 215, 15 and 91 /215/60 Interchange.
In response to Commissioner Puga's question if the committee had identified another
alternate corridor from Riverside County to Orange County, Commissioner Lowe explained
that was the next phase. Steve Smith added that the next step was to met with Orange
County officials, staff and elected officials, to formulate study strategies.
Hideo Sugita stated that the natural re-scoping of the CETAP effort was starting to be
worked so that what was spent to date will be measured, what is anticipated as real
money is known and what can be accomplished with the intention of completing work.
This is to guarantee that significant accomplishments and milestones were made and that
something of value was gained when this ends. Additional funding commitments are being
aggressively pursued. He believed that what was received this year in additional funding
could be duplicated next year, but he would prefer to do better.
Commissioner Bob Buster indicated that transportation system should be viewed very
carefully when providing the economic links, truck lanes, mass transit lanes, to Orange
County in order to attract industries to the area.
Commissioner Lowe responded that the committee was concerned about the economic
development of this area, and not continuing to transport to western county. In the next
step, a symposium will be held to look at the integration of different modes of
transportation that augment the automobile and would also supplement that trip. The
committee is dedicated and a proponent of alternate needs of transportation. The next
phase will be started in the beginning of February.
Chairman Mullen reminded the Commission that the committee was charged with having
these corridors be multi -mobile, it will not be just buses and trucks, but technology of the
future as well.
M/S/C (Wilson/Kleindienst) to receive and file Working Paper #3 and approve the
recommendations from the CETAP Advisory Committee on the corridors to move
forward to CETAP Phase II.
12. MEASURE "A" STRATEGIC PLAN BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND ASSUMPTIONS
Eric Haley, Executive Director, stated that the Commission received Ca!trans' draft project
study report, which included recommendations for the Route 91 - Mary to 7t Streets
Project. The preferred alternative will generate a minimum savings of $67 million in
escalated dollars for the purposes of constructing this project. At minimum, the project
costs dropped from $237 million down to a little over $170 million. The net effect of re-
scoping Route 91 project is to make it fully fundable within a projected western county
formula based revenue stream. The second most important impact is that the county -wide
RCTC Minutes
January 12, 2000
Page 7
discretionary rounds in 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, will go forward as anticipated and the
total currently projected to be equal amounts leading up to a $58 million open county -wide
discretionary amount. This is consistent with the distribution called for in the formula
allocation effort which was approved two years ago. He then thanked Caltrans and Greg
Ramirez for efforts on this project.
Commissioner Dick Kelly noted that noted included as an important factor was the fact
that in the Coachella Valley, individual cities fund 25 % of all the projects, which is a vital
sum of money.
M/SIC (Lowe/Moore) to: 1) Support full funding for the widening of State Route 91
between Mary and Seventh Streets that is consistent with previously approved
formulas for countywide highway projects and does not exceed a total cost of
$170.7 million (current dollars); 2) Reaffirm previously approved Commission
actions allocating funding for Western County highway projects while protecting
and maintaining the formula share of State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP) Dollars (currently estimated at $58 million) for countywide discretionary
needs; and, 3) Receive and file the Draft Supplemental Project Study Report on the
widening of State Route 91 between Mary and Seventh Streets in the City of
Riverside.
13. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
None.
14. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
A. Eric Haley reported on: 1) the trip to Sacramento with Commissioners, and
Riverside and Orange Counties officials. A hearing on the toll road is scheduled
Tuesday, February 1, 2000 in Sacramento. It is hoped that legislature initiate a
new process to review toll roads within the State; 2) the opportunity to speak at
the Graduate School of Administration, UC Riverside's annual Inland Empire
Economic Forecast and the level of interests towards the reauthorization of the
Measure; 3) that the RTIP team and the Integrated Project Team will be coming to
the COG's dealing with the infrastructure as it relates to transportation needs. The
cities will have a high degree of participation as it comes through the TAC for
conformity issues as it relates to the General Plan. With regard to the west, the
Habitats Conservation Plan the ACP participation will be important for all the cities
to participate. In order to cover the infrastructure needs within the boundaries,
participation is required in order to be covered by the ACP. Also will be discussed
are the multi -species habitat fee and transportation uniform transportation
mitigation fee issues.
B. Ivan Chand, RCTC's new Chief Financial Officer, was introduced to the
Commission.
RCTC Minutes
January 12, 2000
Page 8
C. Commissioner Roy Wilson requested to move back the Commission meeting time
from 9:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., as was set last year. The reason for the change to
the 9:30 a.m. time was that the Executive Committee meets at 8:00 a.m. and it
provided time to fully discuss items on their agenda. The Executive Committee
meeting time will be moved to 7:30 a.m., if needed, to allow them time for
discussion and the Commission meeting time to start at 9:00 a.m. was held
regarding changing the Commission meetings to 9:00 a.m. The schedule change
will be effective RCTC meeting in March 2000.
D. Commissioner Stan Lisiewicz, updated the Commission on the proposed median
barriers on 215/15 which was reported at the last meeting. Median barriers were
proposed for the entire length of those routes, with three exceptions. Two of the
three have been approved, they are currently working on the third. Eric Haley
added that Stan Lisiewicz and Gary Cohoe of Ca!trans advised RCTC of a major
maintenance funding opportunity , thus, RCTC will gain an extra $12.5 million from
a source that is seldom used. This will allow funds currently committed to an
auxiliary lane on Route 91 to be moved to Route 74, which will decrease RCTC's
interest obligations as the Route74 project is accelerated.
E. Commissioner Kelly is concerned that the Governor's budget proposal sent a
message of "use it or lose it". He requested that RCTC staff do a review so that
no allocation will be lost. Eric Haley explained that $600 million is State funds,
$300 million is for street maintenance and the balance is for congestion
mitigation/air quality which has to run through an extraordinary project by project
assessment. Reason that funds are not spent is due to State regulations.
F. Commissioner Patrick Williams asked if staff could get an audience with the
Governor to discuss the transportation needs. Chairman Tom Mullen explained that
in November, he met with the Governor, along with individuals from the contracting
industry where there was a good discussion with regards to SCA 3 and
transportation funding. He expects something come out this year concerning
transportation.
15. ADJOURNMENT
With no other items to be discussed by the Commission, Chairman Mullen adjourned the
meeting at 10:45 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30
a.m., Wednesday, February 9, 2000 in Norco, California.
Respectfully submitted,
1CI
N ty Ko haver
rk of the Boar
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
AME
.6,r44 vr4 f,
%1/2 /1,/,,,eZz%
JPM.) CNtegN) K
,C=6 PC-; � � S
6(ect gyferT
(1.)-}-- .1
�i/tD
14-N aZ,Z
Miry PAE L Wi« � ,✓
_ 40/0 ‘1111PL
/L-dit' Zuz: .S
,PA/k/HALL
12`& �s7EJL
Signing is not required
COMMISSION MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1999
9:30 A.M.
SIGN -IN SHEET
AGENCY j
wyr:17 GI
1 c1
7-74 6-0,24 c rc
('o/PC%v
040; 4-- Ho7 5�Ill 4y s
14 OM, Ar774-
_27i47)./A.tiJ iiiF? L s
"'w- S ,
t/14.iley
/NDRGv
fl i-f
TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
672 / 71(2 / (19,1// 26
f22 -_y/ �k l '22 -.3 iZ 6
7e:3(4400H
7Lb (.3 s4 ,),
909-7 9r-f 9 9'.3 / 9v9 -7 9S-0,SO
qQg -VS=Zeol,ei l 91 S- 4rS=oZ3C�
-Roof7c=0 —C.)3(
9/' (973 7t :z 7 3/ e? 1 7.20�
760 329 4/90l rdb 25i-se .3st
5c7-
l000 l 160 - 7 77-710 )
9� 9' 5'5-57 /e' ?el
16o .3y,?•6s ov/ 74,0 --IX.?• 079,44
-3/1 /
735- P-Mo
gss-AD10
1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
COMMISSION MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1999
9:30 A.M.
PLEASE SIGN IN
IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, PLEASE
COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A TESTIMONY CARD TO THE CLERK OF THE
COMMISSION
E
/ J �/,s f 1/0e71
rrzi ► , uDET-AV\k!
AV2tc,6 4127 rs
ti'r1 (-0 14,A-1 4 -4,r
)3,14,k)�
14
1
1
;TE 2_D
gr/la !� S'an 171; vc
Signing is not required
AGENCY _
v r,7i�uA, Gu�2 S 1.(/(jy1�
C
C .J G
14V it17 nay/r.�
( VAC, t
L✓� Co t-
elwD
C_ Ci C
inCtid otobnoth
►ncaGitwb2.eol<
(�� l - CAA< c
SO Ca ( Arra( of (rourJ
TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
(gaq)-A, “-is,(-/ -/ z. z g
yJ 3 -s�„7 s/
!(7z
lb3-- 9i 21
3,G 27
7�2 -177/ 7
- 44 "7Z
/ 3(b3- 70134 .
13K0-J9 /T
/ 27i,-4/vPj
3 - tt2 \ /
--7 e 7 - 7rgr, F57
(2/ 32 2/7-6od l 62/92/7- 04K
Oo y) 65-7 /93/ ' .
cfoit4007
2 2.2 / 7.2
78?)-ucot
78-i - 3SZ61
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
DATE:
February 9, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Budget and Implementation Committee
David W. Shepherd, Director of Intergovernmental and Legislative
Affairs
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Federal Appropriations
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve staff and federal advocates be directed to work on
securing Congressional Appropriations for the listed projects.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Each year, as part of the Federal Budget Process, Congress passes a Federal
Transportation Appropriations bill. Typically contained in the bill are transit projects
for which the Transportation Equity Act of the 21' Century (TEA 21) did not
specifically provided appropriations and other non -highway projects which can be
funded through discretionary funds created by TEA 21.
Last year, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) requested funding
for a host of projects that included highway projects. While no requests for highway
projects received appropriations, a $500,000 appropriation was made for the
Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP). Given last
year's experience, staff is recommending seeking appropriations for the following
projects in the amounts listed:
Project Description
Amount Requested
Palm Desert Intermodal Transit Station
$3 million
Morongo Creek Railroad Bridge in
Cathedral City
$1 million
Dillon Road Grade Crossing in
Coachella
$6 million
CETAP
$1 million
C?0f01
Project Description
Amount Requested
Connection of Riverside Metrolink
Station to UP/SP Riverside Branch and
San Jacinto Branch Line, and upgrade
of Riverside Branch to Class 3 RR
standards
$7.3 million
Rail improvements necessary for
Intercity Rail Passenger Service
connecting Coachella Valley, Riverside,
Orange County and Los Angeles
$28 million
Additional funding for planning and
project development for SR 79
Realignment in the City of Hemet
$3 million
Purchase of two hydrogen fuel cell zero
emission buses and support equipment
for incorporation into the SunLine fleet
of clean air vehicles
$2 million
Indio Intermodal Transit Station
$1.5 million
Staff developed this list based on each project's potential for receiving funding. The
list primarily consists of projects which provide public transit services, are safety
related and have multi modal benefits. Staff believes projects of this nature have the
highest probability of receiving Congressional appropriations.
) n 0 0 0 2
AMENDED 7B
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
February 9, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Budget and Implementation Committee
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
Todd Kurtz, Bechtel Project Coordinator
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Award Design Contract No. RO-2042 for State Route 60 HOV
Lanes
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission award design contract No. RO-2042 to Holmes and Narver
Infrastructure for final PS&E design services for State Route 60 HOV Lanes (1-
215/SR60 Interchange to Redlands Boulevard).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Measure "A" Strategic Plan includes improvements to Route 60, between the East
Junction of 1-215/SR60 and Redlands Boulevard, a length of approximately 7.6 miles.
The improvements would widen the existing Route 60 by adding one HOV lane in each
direction. The Route 60 HOV lane improvement project has existing environmental
clearance that will be updated. This project will be coordinated with the I-215 projects
between Day Street and the SR60/91 /1-215 Interchange that will be constructed by
Caltrans in the same time frame. The SR 60 HOV project will also include the
improvements to the Perris Boulevard interchange ramps that the Commission included
with the authorization of the CMAQ funds. The Perris Boulevard interchange will
require environmental clearance.
At the July 1999 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved $26,165,880 of CMAQ
dollars to design and construct the SR 60 Measure A HOV lane project between the
East Junction of the SR 60 with 1-215 and Redlands Boulevard in Moreno Valley.
At the September 8, 1999 Commission meeting, the Commission directed staff to
prepare and advertise a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Final Plans, Specifications
and Estimate (PS&E) for this project.
The calendar of events was as follows:
Distribution of RFP
Proposals delivered to RCTC
Short Listed firms notified
Interview of short listed firms
November 29, 1999
December 22, 1999
January 10, 2000
January 18, 2000
Staff received proposals from nine (9) firms. A selection panel was assembled, which
consisted of representatives from RCTC/Bechtel, Ca!trans, the City of Moreno Valley,
the City of Riverside and the County of Riverside. The selection panel reviewed the
nine (9) proposals and short-listed three (3) of the nine (9) participating firms.
All three (3) firms presented teams that would be capable of competing the proposed
scope of work. After consideration of the proposed project teams, knowledge of the
project and proposed project approach, the selection panel ranked the three (3) firms
interviewed as follows:
Top Ranked
Second
Third
Holmes & Narver Infrastructure
URS Greiner Woodward Clyde
Parsons Brinckerhoff
The negotiated Holmes & Narver cost proposal, scope of work and schedule is
attached. Staff confirmed scoping details with the consultant and was able to
negotiate the project cost down from the submitted $3.6 million to $2,229,400
$2,299,400. The RCTC model consultant agreement provided by RCTC legal counsel
will be used.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$2,220,400 $2,299,400
Source of Funds
CMAQ matched with Measure A
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
February 9, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Budget and Implementation Committee
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
Todd Kurtz, Bechtel Project Coordinator
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Award Design Contract No. RO-2042 for State Route 60 HOV
Lanes
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission award design contract No. RO-2042 to Holmes and Narver
Infrastructure for final PS&E design services for State Route 60 HOV Lanes (I-
215/SR60 Interchange to Redlands Boulevard).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Measure "A" Strategic Plan includes improvements to Route 60, between the East
Junction of 1-215/SR60 and Redlands Boulevard, a length of approximately 7.6 miles.
The improvements would widen the existing Route 60 by adding one HOV lane in each
direction. The Route 60 HOV lane improvement project has existing environmental
clearance that will be updated. This project will be coordinated with the 1-215 projects
between Day Street and the SR60/91 /1-215 Interchange that will be constructed by
Ca!trans in the same time frame. The SR 60 HOV project will also include the
improvements to the Perris Boulevard interchange ramps that the Commission included
with the authorization of the CMAQ funds. The Perris Boulevard interchange will
require environmental clearance.
At the July 1999 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved $26,165,880 of CMAQ
dollars to design and construct the SR 60 Measure A HOV lane project between the
East Junction of the SR 60 with 1-215 and Redlands Boulevard in Moreno Valley.
At the September 8, 1999 Commission meeting, the Commission directed staff to
prepare and advertise a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Final Plans, Specifications
and Estimate (PS&E) for this project.
('00003
The calendar of events was as follows:
Distribution of RFP
Proposals delivered to RCTC
Short Listed firms notified
Interview of short listed firms
November 29, 1999
December 22, 1999
January 10, 2000
January 18, 2000
Staff received proposals from nine (9) firms. A selection panel was assembled, which
consisted of representatives from RCTC/Bechtel, Caltrans, the City of Moreno Valley,
the City of Riverside and the County of Riverside. The selection panel reviewed the
nine (9) proposals and short-listed three (3) of the nine (9) participating firms.
All three (3) firms presented teams that would be capable of competing the proposed
scope of work. After consideration of the proposed project teams, knowledge of the
project and proposed project approach, the selection panel ranked the three (3) firms
interviewed as follows:
Top Ranked
Second
Third
Holmes & Narver Infrastructure
URS Greiner Woodward Clyde
Parsons Brinckerhoff
The negotiated Holmes & Narver cost proposal, scope of work and schedule is
attached. Staff confirmed scoping details with the consultant and was able to
negotiate the project cost down from the submitted $3.6 million to $2,229,400. The
RCTC model consultant agreement provided by RCTC legal counsel will be used.
Financial Assessment
Project cost
$2,229,400
Source of Funds CMAQ matched with Measure A
00004
SCOPE OF WORK
General
The consultant shall prepare a Supplemental Project Report to include the Perris
Boulevard Interchange modification, Categorical Exemption/Exclusion and final plans,
specifications and estimates to add an HOV lane in the median from west of Pigeon
Pass Road/Frederick Street interchange (station 34 + 80) to Redlands Boulevard
(station 447 + 50.32). The Consultant will use the 1994 Project Report as the basis
for the SR 60 design work.
Applicable Standards
Roadway design shall be in accordance with the current edition of the Caltrans
Highway Design Manual and the Metric Standard Specifications in effect at the
start of the contract.
Roadway plans shall be prepared in accordance with the current editions of the
Caltrans Drafting and Plans Manual and the Caltrans CADD Users Manual in effect
at the start of the contract.
Plans, specifications and estimates shall be prepared in conformance with the
current editions of the Caltrans Plans, Specifications, and Estimates Guide in effect
at the start of the contract.
Consultant shall submit final plans on CD ROM using MicroStation (.dgn) file format
in accordance with Caltrans standards. Consultant will provide the Special Provisions
in Microsoft Word on diskette.
Surveys
Aerial Topographic mapping in Imperial unit/DGN format will be provided by RCTC.
The Consultant shall "soft" convert to metric format for use as the base mapping
for the project.
Provide roadway cross-section surveys at Pigeon Pass Road, Heacock Street, Perris
Boulevard undercrossings. Provide soffit elevations at the three undercrossings and
four overcrossings.
Provide cross section drainage surveys for the channel that is parallel to the
westbound Perris Boulevard off ramp.
Provide edge of traveled way (ETW) elevations at a minimum interval of 30 meters
for the inside lane in each direction. The elevation of the ETW for the outside lane
will obtained in the super -elevated areas only if as -built information is not available.
Top of drainage structures in the median will be elevated at the same time that the
ETW along the inside lane is elevated.
��000.05
Provide geotechnical boring location surveys.
Provide soundwall and retaining wall surveys cross section survey at 30 meter
intervals.
Utility location surveys, Records of Surveys, property and right of way survey is
not required.
Caltrans will provide horizontal and vertical control that is to be used as the basis
of Consultant surveys.
Consultant shall obtain a no cost encroachment permit from Caltrans and local
agencies prior to beginning any field work.
Deliverable: Results of the design survey will be provided in 3d-DGN and ASCII
formats.
Geotechnical Reports
The geotechnical scope of work can be divided into four major tasks: (1) the
geotechnical field investigation, (2) laboratory soil testing, (3) engineering analyses,
and (4) reports preparation.
Geo technical Field Investigation
Prior to the actual field exploration, we will review available geotechnical data to plan
the location of the borings. Based on this review, we will prepare a Boring Location
Map that will be submitted for Caltrans review and approval.
Pavement Structural Sections. Along the proposed 12.3 kilometers of roadway, we
propose drilling about 42 shallow exploratory borings using hollow -stem auger drill rig
for evaluation of pavement structural section. The borings will be drilled to a
maximum depth of about 2.5 meters to collect subgrade materials for R-value testing.
Sound Walls. For the sound walls, 30 borings will be drilled at the proposed wall
locations. The maximum boring depth would be about 8 meters below the ground
surface.
Bridges. For the three bridge widenings (each a three -span structure) and one new
bridge at Perris Boulevard Off -ramp, a total of 8 borings will be drilled (3 at Heacock
Street, 3 at Perris Blvd., none at Frederick Street, and 2 at Perris Blvd Ramp). The
maximum boring depth would be about 15 to 20 meters below the ground surface.
0006
Lead Content Testing. In addition to the borings for the pavement, sound walls, and
bridges, we propose an additional 12 shallow hand -auger borings to a depth of
approximately 0.61 meter. Soil samples will be collected at depths of approximately
152, 305 and 610 mm for lead content testing.
Laboratory Soil Testing
The field boring logs will be reviewed to select representative bulk and ring samples
for laboratory testing. Various laboratory tests will be performed on subsurface
samples to determine their physical and engineering characteristics.
A hazardous waste investigation is not anticipated based on the statements in the
1994 Project Report.
Geotechnical Engineering Analyses
Results obtained from the field investigation and laboratory tests will be used to
develop idealized subsurface profiles and define soil parameters for engineering
analyses. The following analyses are anticipated for the project:
Capacity of pile foundations and bearing capacity of shallow foundations.
Lateral earth pressures and foundation design.
Pavement structural sections will be designed in accordance with California
Department of Transportation standards and methods.
Corrosion potential of on -site soil will be evaluated in order to provide
recommendations for concrete or steel structures.
Recommendations for temporary excavations and shoring, overexcavations, fill
placement and relative compaction of fill, and slope stability.
Seismicity and seismic hazards including controlling earthquake, maximum
ground acceleration, and liquefaction potential.
Report Preparation
Upon completion of the above tasks, EMI will prepare several reports for the project.
A draft Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) will contain our findings, conclusions, and
recommendations for the proposed freeway widening and sound wall foundation
recommendations. This report will contain logs of exploratory borings presented on
letter -size sheets. Separate draft foundation reports will be prepared for each of the
three bridge widenings and the new bridge at Perris Boulevard off -ramp. These reports
will contain Caltrans standard LOTB sheet. A draft memorandum will be prepared to
summarize the findings and recommendations for the lead content testing. Five copies
of the draft geotechnical reports and memorandum will be submitted to RCTC and
Caltrans. EMI will prepare final reports incorporating review comments. Five copies
of the final report will be submitted for approval.
�0007
Permits
Consultant shall obtain no cost encroachment permit from Caltrans and local agencies
prior to beginning any field work on the project. A traffic control plan if required shall be
submitted to RCTC and Caltrans for review and approval.
Deliverable: Five Copies of the Final GDR and the Final Foundation Report.
Utility Coordination
Consultant shall prepare utility plans based on information obtained from utility
companies, Caltrans and the cities of Moreno Valley and Riverside. Relocation
plans if required will be prepared by the respective owner. Consultant will update
the utility plans to show the disposition of each utility on the project. Pothole
information including location surveys if necessary will be the responsibility of the
respective utility owner.
Supplemental Project Report
The consultant shall prepare a Geometric Approval Drawing (GAD) for modifications
to the Perris Boulevard interchange per the concept included in the RFP. This is the
only GAD required since the rest of the project calls for an inside widening to
provide the HOV lane.
Using RCTC/City provided modeling information (generally obtained from SCAG)
prepare traffic analysis for existing, future no -build and future build conditions.
Prepare a Project Report level estimate, a Advance Structure Planning Study will
not be prepared for the Perris Boulevard westbound on -ramp bridge, since the
project includes PS&E and a bridge type selection report will be prepared during the
PS&E phase.
Prepare a Categorical Exception/Exclusion in accordance with CEQA/NEPA
requirements.
Prepare a project level noise study for the purpose of establishing the noise barrier
wall elevations. A schematic similar to the one in the 1994 project report will be
included identifying the location and heights of the proposed noise barriers.
Prepare a Supplemental Project Report in accordance with the Caltrans Project
Development and Procedures Manual. The Supplemental Project Report is to
00008
address changes that have taken place since approval of the Project Report,
including the proposed modifications to the Perris Boulevard interchange,
addressing vertical clearance issues, updating accident data and updating the cost
estimate necessary to obtain approval of the Supplemental Project Report.
Fact Sheet
Prepare a Fact Sheet for Exceptions from Mandatory Design Standards for non
standard vertical clearances at each overcrossing. The Fact Sheet will also address
the previously approved non-standard lane width, shoulder width and distance to
concrete barrier. These are the only anticipated non standard features.
Deliverable: Fact Sheet for Exceptions from Mandatory Design
Roadway Design
Prepare median inside widening plans. Design includes horizontal layout based on
existing geometry and vertical profile for the new edge of traveled way. Outside
widening is part of the next phase of the project.
Prepare plan and profile plans for the Perris Boulevard hook ramps, including
modifications at the intersection with Elder Avenue. Prepare intersection
modification plans for the westbound off -ramp at Perris Boulevard as a result of the
off ramp removal. Lowering of Perris Boulevard and the freeway at each
overcrossing is not anticipated.
Geometric Approval Drawings will be prepared for the Perris Boulevard interchange
modification and will be included in the Supplemental Project Report.
Deliverable: See Sheet Estimate
Structure Design
Median widening at 3 locations:
Pigeon Pass Rd. U.C.
Heacock St. U.C.
Perris Blvd. U.C.
New bridge at the proposed west bound on -ramp at Perris Blvd.
+�00009
Structure Type Selection
Gather as -built plans, maintenance records, etc.
Field review each location
Evaluate geometry & staging
Analyze proposed widened structures for seismic retrofit needs
Prepare bridge General Plans
Prepare GP quantities and cost estimates
Prepare Type Selection and Seismic Evaluation Reports
Attend Type Selection Meeting in Sacramento
Revise reports and GPs per meeting and distribute per EFPB
Notes:
Scope is based on the retrofit analysis conclusion that no retrofit is necessary at any
of the undercrossings. It is also based on a single combined Type Selection/Retrofit
Strategy meeting with Caltrans in Sacramento at which all 4 bridges are addressed.
Preliminary PS&E (65 % )
Structure Design
CADD drafting of structure plans
Independent structure check
Prepare quantities
Prepare Marginal Estimate
Prepare structure portion of Special Provisions
Final PS&E
Revise PS&E per comments from RCTC and Caltrans and prepare written
response to comments.
Compile calculations, quantity summary sheets, and other documentation as
described in Caltrans Externally Financed Projects Branch Manual.
Compile structures portion of RE Pending File.
Deliverables: See Sheet Estimate
00010
Noise Barriers
Consultant shall prepare a noise attenuation report a noise attenuation report for
the project corresponding to the noise barrier locations identified in the 1994
Project Report. The Report will be submitted to RCTC/Caltrans for review and
approval (see Supplemental Project Report task).
Noise Barrier Plans will be prepared in accordance with the approved noise
attenuation report.
Deliverables: See Sheet Estimate
Retaining Walls
It is anticipated that retaining walls will be required along the east side of Perris
Boulevard at the undercrossing and along the westbound on ramp. Retaining wall
plans will be prepared at these locations.
Deliverables: See Sheet Estimate
Drainage Design
Prepare on -site hydrology report to address the proposed addition of the HOV lanes
in the median. The hydrology report will conform to Caltrans and Riverside County
Flood Control District requirements. The report will be submitted for review and
approval.
Modify existing drainage system to accommodate new HOV lanes. It is anticipated
that the majority of the median drainage system can be abandoned with the
exception of the super -elevation areas. Improvements to off -site drainage system
are not part of this phase of the work.
Deliverables: Hydrology Report and Drainage Plans (See sheet estimate for Drainage
Plans)
Traffic Engineering
Consultant shall prepare a construction handling plans based on two major stages
of construction.
"!o0011
Prepare Pavement Delineation and Signing plans
Prepare traffic signal plans at the Perris Boulevard interchange. The plans include
a removal plan and modification plan at the Perris Blvd./westbound off ramp
intersection and a new signal plan at the intersection of the hook ramps and Elder
Avenue.
Electrical plans will be prepared for the fiber optic system as defined in the RFP.
The fiber optic system including ramp meter connections, CCTV locations,
Changeable Message Signs, Vehicle Detection Stations, and Traffic Operation
Cabinets will be shown on the same sheet. Caltrans will provide the standard
plans, details and specifications for the communication system.
Prepare freeway lighting and sign plan at the Perris Boulevard interchange.
Right of Way
It is our understanding the necessary right of way for the Perris Boulevard Hook
ramps owned by the City of Moreno Valley. The City will transfer the right of way
to Caltrans. No other right of way is required except for temporary construction
easements (TCE) at the noise barrier wall locations. The Consultant shall prepare
legal description and exhibit based on preliminary Title Reports where TCEs are
required at residential properties. Actual property right of way surveys are not
required.
Specifications and Estimates
Prepare specifications and estimates for inclusions with the plan submittals at the
65%, 90%, 100% and Final stage of the project. The specifications and estimates
will be revised prior to each stage in response to Agency comments.
�0012
COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMI
NAME OF CONSULTANT
Holmes & Narver, Inc.
TITLE OF PROJECT
SR 60 HOV
Dew? Description
Estimated
Hours
(Average)
Rate/Hour
Total Estimated
Cost (S)
1. DIRECT LABOR (Specify) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET
PROJECT MANAGER
565
S54.00
30,510.00
PROJECT ENGINEER
1,135
S42.00
47,670.00
SENIOR DESIGN ENGINEER
3,293
S37.00
121,841.00
DESIGN ENGINEER
2,959
$31.00
91,729.00
CADD TECHNICIAN
4,782
S26.00
124,332.00
CLERICAL
288
S19.00
5,472.00
TOTAL
13,022
'•`�#'>�# •'li.f. .r "<}.
S421,554.00
2. INDIRECT COSTS Overhea G&A-s
( d, pecify)
Burden Rate
X Base =
Burden S
()
'. <1: ;'.. >:;?r .. •.>•s•>:<'r:%:; .i
,:1;:�:�::::s::�xr:•:M1<,.;:........
144.45%,
S421,554.00
S608,934.75
S608,934.75
3. TOTAL DIRECT LABOR AND INDIRECT COSTS (Sum of lines 1 and 2)
S1,030,488.75
4. FLXED FEE OR PROFIT (Specify, applies to line 3 onl
Percent
X Base =
Fee (S)
10.009,6
S1,030,488.75
S103,048.88
S103,048.88
S103,048.88
5. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
PRINTING
520,000.00
TRAVEL
S3,000.00
OVERNGHT MAIL/DELIVERY
$3 000 00
MISC (CADD CHARGES, COMPUTER USAGE, ETC.)
SUBCONSULTANTS
CH2MHII.L
S602,720.00
Earth Mechanics, Inc.
S199,283.00
Associated Engineers
S147,000.00
Lynn Capouya, Inc.
S30,909.00
Katz Okitsu
S140,000.00
The Culver Group
S20,000.00
6. TOTAL CONTRACT COST (Sum of lines 3, 4 and 5)
S2,299,400.00
�!00013
ID
Description
Milesbne 0 - Project Award / Negotiate
Days
20
-- `'w— dot re t2 Proceed
52_ Data Hseearch/TtVlioAnahmski_ 5
53 Design Surveys- - — -- _S4
54 -_ Perla Blvd ID Concept —_ 20
_ 00__ Prepare Draft SoPolementi PR 20
— 54 _ Ereoare CEGErecbnicalZtWim 15
so Agemyl eview
—_42_ Prepare Final Supplemental. PR
24
20
15
64 • 20
66 Submit Final Supplemental PR 0
1111
AD
40
20
40
__ IC/ Drainage 45
_ 1 so _ Hight-414% 30
1 0_ 1lltNlte$— 30
�70 t endscan_QtagIPlan 40
—104_ Pmleot-D4el 20
105_ B_d90e malsk4tlon 4o
190 Submk Prelkn Engr Doc
ilestone 2-Design Concept Design
110 4a2mdric ARMLatDembints-_
120 Geotectinkel Design R5por1
_J25 CT Review Rpt
A30 Trask Engkeering
200 1ha Drawings
__22i1 1lItNltae
240 Submit 35% Prelim Design PS & E
40
_ 50
0
Section
contract Negotiation
Moir Schedule / Ouray control Program
Reece to Proceed
D da Resoerch Marne &Wane
Design Surve-r _ _ _
Pads Blvd IC :0neapt
Preps Draft supplanrntn PR
Preere CECE Technical Studios
Agency Rsaaw
Pnpr. Final SupplemMal PR
Agency Review
SOW Final Supplement IPR
♦- ....--•V DaonWrle &own Drawing*
♦ OsolsNnrkY lesign Report
• ♦ CT salmi Ret
♦ ♦ Tr a, Engineering
♦ ♦ I mimeo
• •Rlyhlol-wry
• UMW,
♦ rr • • Capt van
�A-- ♦ Proton Coat
• ridge Typo twsian
Sabena PmIIM Imp Deo
Prelim IT Doe Review
_040 Prengra Dr1B Es0E_ 100
310 ELWIN Cgngt1JA Schedule
320-110tilled ROW e / datetiablInto 44
_190 Sithmit 05%_ 108112ss100 PO 4_E— 4
30
Milestote 5- Final PS&E
_44 UpdateJ3otdElans_a_BrklgePlena 50
42D UDdalg Reports / SSP's / Estimates 41¢
___ag4_ slams 95% DsOP 0301diaddol1 r _ _ __.4
__AN_ 051011aEdgviaw _20
_450_ Pfen_FkalLES4E Package --20
400 Submit 100% Design to District 9 0
470 Submit 100% Design to HO 0
Propel SYR 120C100
Proton Frith 28AAY02
Den Den 120CT09
Run Dees 27JANo0
0 nn.nra Sy Inc.
�Pmgra Or
Lae Drawings
Utaks
�Submit sees PrMbn Design PS a E
^/ 261E PSe1 Rw,w -
Prepare Drat PSa
Prepare Combo: an Scbodule
MEW ROW Update / etatrlNs Into
Submit as% Final besIg n PS a E
06%PSS Review
Update Rad Panne i Bridge
Undid* Roper, / SSA's / ENRn i
Submit 95%Design (Road a
Od%PS&E Rwa ♦.. —♦
Prep Final PS&E Pao
Submit 100%D*Ngn to Distil
Submit 10016 Design to 4
8400
RCTC / Caltrans District 8
Design for State Route 60 HOV
raft Schedule
Snell t d 1
Holme 6E Narver
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
DATE:
January 24, 2000
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
Budget and Implementation Committee
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
Todd Kurtz, Project Coordinator
THROUGH:
Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Consolidation of Route 74 Design Cooperative Agreements
between Caltrans and RCTC.
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Committee recommend: 1) approval of the attached form of agreement with
Caltrans; 2) authorize the Executive director to make any negotiated changes required;
and 3) authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement, pursuant to RCTC legal
counsel review.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
At the June 11, 1997 Commission meeting, $4.1 million was allocated from Measure
"A" Funds to the Route 74 Caltrans State Highway Operations and Protection Program
(SHOPP) Projects. Additional funds were allocated at the November 12, 1998
Commission meeting for a total allocation of $4,264,485.
Caltrans has officially stopped work on the State Route 74 SHOPP projects due to the
action taken by the Commission at the October 13, 1999 Commission meeting to
accelerate the delivery of the Measure "A" widening project.
At the December 8, 1999 Commission meeting, Measure "A" funds allocated to the
SHOPP projects were re -allocated back to the State Route 74 Measure "A" widening
project. At this meeting, staff was also directed to work with Caltrans to obtain
agreements that transfer State SHOPP Project funds to RCTC so that they can be used
for the State Route 74 Measure "A" widening project to help offset the costs incurred
by RCTC to accelerate the project.
Consequently, due to funding and final engineering/construction schedule changes, we
are required to update our Cooperative Agreements with Caltrans.
100015
The most recent draft form of the Design Cooperative Agreement (No. 8-11 16) for
Route 74 between 1-15 and Th Street is attached for your information and review as
negotiations are continuing between Caltrans staff and RCTC staff. This Agreement
replaces previous Cooperative Agreement No.'s 8-1056, 8-1076, and 8-1077 in their
entirety. A separate construction cooperative agreement is being prepared by Caltrans
and will be forwarded to the Commission for approval at a future date.
Attachment
08-Riv-74-KP 27.7/41.5
(PM 17.24/25.8)
SR 74 from I-15 in the City
of Lake Elsinore to 7th Street
In the City of Perris
08303 - 464101
District Agreement No. 8-1116
DESIGN
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT, entered into on , is between the STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as
STATE, and
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION, a public entity, referred to herein
as COMMISSION.
RECITALS
(1) STATE and COMMISSION, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 130, are
authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways
within County of Riverside.
(2) COMMISSION desires State highway improvements consisting of widening the
existing two lane roadway to four lanes and providing a continuous left turn lane on
Route 74 between I-15 in the City of Lake Elsinore to 7* Street in the City of Perris
referred to herein as "PROJECT", and is willing to fund one hundred percent (100%)
of all capital outlay and staffing costs, except for costs of STATE's oversight of
environmental, design and right of way activities.
(3) STATE and COMMISSION entered into a Master Agreement (District Agreement No.
8-685, Document No. 7549) on January 10, 1990, and Supplement No. 1, dated
November 1, 1990, to document the parties understanding for carrying out the
Riverside County Sales Tax Measure "A" Transportation Expenditure Plan.
(4) STATE and COMMISSION entered into the Advanced Right of Way Acquisition and
Resale Agreement (District Agreement No. 8-759) on November 12, 1991, which
authorizes STATE to acquire right of way on advanced acquisitions only.
D_, December 9, 1999
1
4-!00017
District Agreement No. 8-1116
(5) STATE and COMMISSION have also entered into a Right of Way Agreement (District
Agreement No. 8-800, Document No. 8773) on February 10, 1993, and Amendment
No. S/1 dated February 10, 1993, relating to the performance of right of way activities
and utility location and relocation by STATE on behalf of COMMISSION to facilitate
accomplishment of COMMISSION's Sales Tax Measure "A" Transportation
Expenditure Plan.
(6) This Agreement supersedes any prior Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) relating
to PROJECT.
(7) Construction of said PROJECT will be the subject of a separate future Agreement.
(8) The parties hereto intend to define herein the terms and conditions under which
PROJECT is to be developed, designed, and fmanced.
(9) This Agreement supersedes in their entirety, Agreements 8-1056, 8-1076, and 8-1077.
SECTION I
COMMISSION AGREES:
(1) To fund one hundred percent (100%) of all preliminary and design engineering costs,
including, but not limited to, costs for preparation of contract documents and
advertising and awarding the PROJECT construction contract.
(2) To have a Supplemental Project Report (SPR), including all necessary Environmental
Reevaluation Documentation (ERD), and detailed Plans, Specifications and Estimate
(PS&E) prepared at no cost to STATE and to submit each to STATE for review and
approval at appropriate stages of development. SPR and ERD, final plans and standard
special provisions shall be signed by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of
California.
(3) To permit STATE to monitor and participate in the selection of personnel who will
prepare the SPR, conduct environmental studies and obtain PROJECT approval,
prepare the PS&E, provide the right of way engineering services, and perform right of
way activities. COMMISSION agrees to consider any request by STATE to
discontinue the services of any personnel considered by STATE to be tmqualified on
the basis of credentials, professional expertise, failure to perform in accordance with
scope of work and/or other pertinent criteria.
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
2
00018
District Agreement No. 8-1116
(4) Personnel who prepare the PS&E and right of way maps shall be available to STATE,
at no cost to STATE, through completion of construction of PROJECT to discuss
problems which may arise during construction and/or to make design revisions for
contract change orders.
(5) Not to use funds from any Federal -aid program for design or acquisition of rights of
way for PROJECT.
(6) To make written application to STATE for necessary Encroachment Permits
authorizing entry onto STATE's right of way to perform surveying and other
investigative activities required for preparation of the Right of Way Maps, SPR, ERD
and/or PS&E.
(7) To identify and locate all utility facilities within the PROJECT area as part of its
PROJECT design responsibility. All utility facilities not relocated or removed in
advance of construction shall be identified on the PROJECT plans and specifications.
(8) To identify and locate all high and low risk underground facilities within the PROJECT
area and to protect or otherwise provide for such facilities, all in accordance with
STATE's "Manual on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway
Rights of Way." COMMISSION hereby acknowledges receipt of STATE's "Manual
on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights of Way."
(9) If any existing public and/or private utility facilities conflict with PROJECT
construction or violate STATE's encroachment policy, COMMISSION shall malce all
necessary arrangements with the owners of such facilities for their protection,
relocation or removal in accordance with STATE policy and procedure for those
facilities Iocated within the limits of work providing for the improvement to the State
highway and in accordance with COMMISSION policy for those facilities located
outside of the limits of work for the State highway. Total costs of such protection,
relocation or removal shall be in accordance with STATE policy and procedure.
(10) To furnish evidence to STATE, in a form acceptable to STATE, that arrangements
have been made for the protection, relocation, or removal of all conflicting facilities
within STATE's right of way and that such work will be completed prior to the award
of the contract to construct PROJECT or as covered in the Special Provisions for said
contract. This evidence shall include a reference to all required State highway
encroachment permits.
(11) COMMISSION shall require the utility owner and/or its contractors performing the
relocation work within STATE's right of way to obtain a STATE encroachment permit
prior to the performance of said relocation work.
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
3
�00019
District Agreement No. 8-1116
(12) To perform all right of way activities, including all eminent domain activities, if
necessary, at no cost to STATE, in accordance with procedures acceptable to STATE,
and in compliance with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations, subject to
STATE oversight to insure that the completed work is acceptable for incorporation into
the State highway right of way.
(13) To utilize the services of a qualified public agency in all right of way .acquisition
related matters in accordance with STATE procedures as contained in Right of Way
Procedural Handbook, Volume 9. Whenever personnel other than personnel of a
qualified public agency are utilized, administration of the personnel contract shall be
performed by a qualified Right of Way person employed or retained by
COMMISSION.
(14) To certify legal and physical control of right of way ready for construction and that all
right of way was acquired in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws and
regulations subject to review and concurrence by STATE prior to the advertisement for
bids for construction of PROJECT.
(15) Upon execution of this Agreement;to submit billing to STATE in the amount of
$568,000. Said billing represents STATE's total contribution for right of way
acquisition for PROJECT.
(16) To pay the remaining costs over and above STATE's total contribution of $568,000 for
right of way acquisition for PROJECT. Total right of way acquisition cost for
PROJECT estimated to be $13,800,000.
(17) To deliver at no cost to STATE legal title to the right of way, including access rights,
free and clear of all encumbrances detrimental to STATE's present and future uses not
later than the date of acceptance by STATE of maintenance and operation of the
highway facility. Acceptance of said title by STATE is subject to a review of a Policy
of Title Insurance in STATE's name to be provided and paid for by COMMISSION.
(18) To provide, at no cost to STATE, survey and mapping services necessary to perpetuate
existing land net and alignment monumentation, in accordance with Sections 8771 and
8765 of the Business and Professionals Code; and to permanently monument at location
of all above roadway alignments, re -alignments, and right of way acquisitions. All the
above to be shown on a Record of Survey filed with the County Surveyor of Riverside
County.
(19) To be responsible, at COMMISSION expense, for the investigation of potential
hazardous waste sites within and outside of the existing State highway right of way that
would impact PROJECT, as part of the responsibility for the ERD for PROJECT.
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
4
!00!020
District Agreement No. 8-1116
(20) To be responsible, at no cost to STATE, for remedy or remedial action of hazardous
material found on present and proposed STATE highway right of way to be acquired
for PROJECT.
(21) If COMMISSION desires to have STATE advertise, award and administer the
construction contract for PROJECT, COMMISSION shall provide all plans prepared
by COMMISSION or COMMISSION's consultant on either 4 or 8 millimeter magnetic
tape using Micro Station Release 5.0 .dgn and/or Micro Station SE V05.07 Rev. 22
files in UNIX TAR or CPIO format or ISO 9660 standard CD Rom format. One copy
of the data on the magnetic tape, including the Engineer's electronic signature and seal,
shall be provided to STATE upon completion of the final PS&E for PROJECT.
STATE reserves the right to modify the magnetic tape requirements and STATE shall
provide COMMISSION advance notice of any such modifications.
SECTION II
STATE AGREES:
(1) To provide, at no cost to COMMISSION, oversight of PROJECT and to provide
prompt reviews and approvals, as appropriate, of submittals by COMMISSION, and to
cooperate in timely processing of PROJECT.
(2) To provide, at no cost to COMMISSION, oversight of all right of way activities
undertaken by COMMISSION, or its designee, pursuant to this Agreement.
(3) To issue, at no cost to COMMISSION, upon proper application by COMMISSION, an
Encroachment Permit to COMMISSION authorizing entry onto STATE's right of way
to perform survey and other investigative activities required for preparation of the SPR,
ERD, Right of Way Maps, and/or PS&E. If COMMISSION uses consultants rather
than its own staff to perform required work, the consultants will also be required to
obtain an Encroachment Permit. The permit will be issued at no cost upon proper
application by the consultants.
(4) To furnish COMMISSION with the necessary existing Right of Way Maps and existing
property descriptions for use by COMMISSION in the acquisition of all new right of
way required for PROJECT.
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
5
00021
(5)
District Agreement No. 8-1116
To deposit with COMMISSION within twenty (20) days of receipt of billing by
COMMISSION, which billing will be forwarded by COMMISSION upon execution of
this Agreement, the amount of $568,000. Said amount represents STATE's total
contribution for right of way acquisition costs for PROJECT estimated to be
$13,800,000.
SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED.
(1) All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the
appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the
California Transportation Commission.
(2) The parties hereto will carry out PROJECT in accordance with the Scope of Work,
attached and made a part of this Agreement, which outlines the specific responsibilities
of the parties hereto. The attached Scope of Work may in the future be modified in
writing to reflect changes in the responsibilities of the respecdve parties. Such
modificadons shall be concurred with by COMMISSION's Chairman and/or Executive
Director or other official designated by COMMISSION and STATE's District Director
for District 8 and become a part of this Agreement after execution by the respective
officials of the parties.
(3) The Project Report (PR) for PROJECT approved on April 5, 1994, and the approved
Supplemental Project Report (SPR) by this reference, shall become part of this
Agreement.
(4) The basic design features (as defined in Attachment 3 of the Scope of Work for
PROJECT) shall comply with those addressed in the approved PR and SPR, unless
modified as required for environmental clearance and/or FHWA approval of
PROJECT.
(5) The design, right of way acquisition, and preparation of environmental documents for
PROJECT shall be performed in accordance with STATE standards and practices
current as of the date of execution of this Agreement. Any exceptions to applicable
design standards shall be approved by STATE via the processes outlined in STATE's
Highway Design Manual and appropriate memorandums and design bulletins published
by STATE. In the event that STATE proposes and/or requires a change in design
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
6
;00022
(7)
District Agreement No. 8-1116
standards, implementation of new or revised design standards shall be done in
accordance with STATE's memorandum "Effective Date for Implementing Revisions to
Design Standards", dated February 8, 1991. STATE shall consult with COMMISSION
in a timely manner regarding effect of proposed and/or required changes on PROJECT.
(6) COMMISSION's share of all changes in development and construction costs associated
with modifications to the basic design features as described above shall be in same
proportion as described in this Agreement, unless mutually agreed by STATE and
COMMISSION in a subsequent amendment to this Agreement.
If a finding is made that Federal and State regulations do not require mitigation of
contaminated material in its present condition within the existing State highway right of
way, COMMISSION shall be responsible, at COMMISSION expense, for any remedial
action required as a result of proceeding with PROJECT. Locations subject to cleanup
include preliminary utility identification and/or relocation work required for
PROJECT.
(8) If Federal and State regulations indicate contaminated material within the existing State
highway right of way presents a threat to public health or the environment, regardless
of whether it is disturbed or not, STATE shall be responsible for the cleanup, at
STATE expense. If STATE's cost to mitigate is increased due to PROJECT, the
additional cost shall be borne by COMMISSION.
(9) The party responsible for funding the cleanup shall be responsible for the development
of the necessary mitigation and remedial plans and designs. Remedial actions proposed
by COMMISSION shall be approved by STATE and shall be performed in accordance
with standards and practices of STATE and other Federal and State regulatory
agencies.
(10) A separate Cooperative Agreement will be required to cover responsibilities and
funding for the PROJECT construction phase.
(11) Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations
to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of
either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the
maintenance of State highways different from the standard of care imposed by law,
(12) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or
Iiability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COMMISSION
under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to
COMMISSION under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to
Government Code Section 895.4, COMMISSION shall fully defend, indemnify and
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
7
t'n0O23
District Agreement No. 8-1116
save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits
or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as
defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or
omitted to be done by COMMISSION under or in connection with any work, authority
or jurisdiction delegated to COMMISSION under this Agreement.
(13) Neither COMMISSION nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any
damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by
STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to
STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to
Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save
harmless COMMISSION from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and
description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section
810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or
in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this
Agreement.
(14) This Agreement may be terminated or provisions contained herein may be altered,
changed, or amended by mutual consent of the parties hereto.
NOTE: Article (15) is on signature page.
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
00024
8
District Agreement No. 8-1116
(15) Except as otherwise provided in Article (14) above, this Agreement shall terminate
upon completion and acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT, or on
December 31, 2005, whichever is earlier in time.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JOSE MEDINA
Director of Transportation
RIVERSIDE COUNTY _
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
By:
Jack F. van Haaster
Chairman
By:
S. LISIEWICZ
District Director REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED
FOR APPROVAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
PROCEDURE: By:
ERIC HALEY
Executive Director
Attorney,
Department of Transportation REVIEWED FOR FISCAL IMPACT:
By:
CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: Dean Martin, Chief
Financial Officer
District Budget Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CERTIFIED AS TO PROCEDURE: By:
Steven C. DeBaun
Best, Best & Krieger
Commission Counsel
Accounting Administrator
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
9
000025
SCOPE OF WORK
District Agreement No. 8-1116
This Scope of Work outlines the specific areas of responsibility for various project
development activities for the proposed State highway improvements consisting of widening
roadway to four lanes and providing a continuous left turn lane on Route 74 between I-15 in
the City of Lake Elsinore to 7th Street in the City of Perris.
(1) STATE will be the Lead Agency for CEQA and NEPA, and COMMISSION will be
the responsible agency. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) will be the
Federal Lead Agency for NEPA. COMMISSION will prepare the Environmental
Reevaluation Document (ERD) to meet the requirements of CEQA and NEPA. The
draft and final reevaluation will require STATE review and approval prior to public
circulation. COMMISSION will provide all data for and prepare drafts of the
Supplemental Project Report (SPR). STATE will review and process the report, and
request approval of the PROJECT and ERD by the FHWA. COMMISSION will be
responsible for the public hearing process.
(2) COMMISSION and STATE concur that the proposal is a Category 4A as defined in
STATE's Project Development Procedures Manual.
(3) COMMISSION will submit drafts of environmental technical reports and individual
sections of the draft environmental documents to STATE, as they are developed, for
review and comment. Traffic counts and projections to be used in the various reports
shall be supplied by STATE if available, or by the COMMISSION. Existing traffic
data shall be furnished by COMMISSION.
(4) STATE will review, monitor, and approve all project development reports, studies, and
plans, and provide all necessary implementation activities up to, but not including,
advertising of PROJECT.
(5) All phases of the PROJECT, from inception through construction, whether done by
COMMISSION or STATE, will be developed in accordance with all policies,
procedures, practices, and standards that STATE would normally follow.
(6) Detailed steps in the project development process are attached to this Scope of Work.
These attachments are intended as a guide to STATE and COMMISSION staff.
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
10
i00026
ATTACHMENT 1
PLANNING PHASE ACTIVITIES
District Agreement No. 8-1116
RESPONSIBILITY
PROJECT ACTIVITY STATE COMMISSION
1. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS & DOCUMENT PREPARATION
Establish Project Development Team (PDT) X X
Approve PDT X
Project Category Determination X
Prepare Preliminary Environmental Assessment X
Identify Preliminary Alternatives and Costs X
Prepare and Submit Environmental Studies and Reports X
Review and Approve Environmental Studies and Reports X
Prepare and Submit Draft Environmental Re-evaluation
Document (ERD) X
Review ERD in District
X
2. PROJECT GEOMETRICS DEVELOPMENT
Prepare Existing Traffic Analysis X
Prepare Future Traffic Volumes for Alternatives X
Prepare Project Geometries and Profiles X
Prepare Layouts and Estimates for Alternatives X
Prepare Operational Analysis for Alternatives X
Review and approve Project Geometries and
Operational Analysis X
3. PROJECT APPROVAL
Lead Agency for Environment Compliance Certifies
ERD in Accordance with its Procedures
Prepare Draft Supplemental Project Report (SPR)
Finalize and Submit Supplemental Project Report
with Certified ED for Approval
Approve Supplemental Project Report
D_, December 9, 1999
11
X
X
X
X
X
0.00027
District Agreement No. 8-1116
ATTACHMENT 2
DESIGN PHASE ACTIVITIES
RESPONSIBILITY
PROJECT ACTIVITY STATE COMMISSION
1. PRELIMINARY COORDINATION
Request 1 - Phase EA X
Field Review of Site X
Provide Geometries
Approve Geometries X
Obtain Surveys and Aerial Mapping
Obtain Copies of Assessor Maps and other R/W Maps
Obtain Copies of As-Builts
Send Approved Geometries to Local Agencies for Review
Revise Approved Geometries if Required
Approve Final Geometries X
Determine Need for Permits from other Agencies X
Request Permits
Initial Hydraulics discussion with District Staff X
Initial Electrical Design discussion with District Staff X
Initial Traffic & Signing discussion with District Staff X
Initial Landscape Design discussion with District Staff X
Plan Sheet Format Discussion X
2. ENGINEERING STUDIES AND REPORTS
Prepare and Submit Materials Report and Typical Section
Review and Approve Materials Report and Typical Section X
Prepare and Submit Landscaping Recommendation
Review and Approve Landscaping Recommendation X
Prepare and Submit Hydraulic Design Studies
Review and Approve Hydraulic Design Studies X
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
12
:100028
X X X X X X X
District Agreement No. 84116
RESPONSIBILITY
PROJECT ACTIVITY STATE COMMISSION
3. R/W ACQUISITION and UTILITIES
Request Utility Verification X
Request Preliminary Utility Relocation Plans from Utilities X
Prepare R/W Requirements X
Prepare R/W and Utility Relocation Cost Estimates X
Submit R/W Requirements & Utility Relocation Plans for Review X
Review and Comment on R/W Requirements X
Longitudinal Encroachment Review X
Longitudinal Encroachment Application to District X
Approve Longitudinal Encroachment Application X
Request Final Utility Relocation Plans X
Check Utility Relocation Plans X
Submit Utility Relocation Plans for Approval X
Approve Utility Relocation Plans X
Submit Final R/W Requirements for Review and Approval X
Fence and Excess Land Review X
R/W Layout Review X
Approve R/W Requirements X
Obtain Title Reports
Complete Appraisals
Review and Approve Appraisals for setting just compensation X
Prepare Acquisition Documents
Acquire R/W
- Open escrows and Make Payments
- Obtain Resolution of Necessity
- Perform Eminent Domain Proceedings
Provide Displacee Relocation Services
Prepare Relocation Payment Valuations
Provide Displacee Relocation Payments
Perform Property Management Activities
Perform R/W Clearance Activities
Prepare and Submit Certification of R/W
Review and Approve Certification of R/W X
Transfer R/W to STATE
- Approve and Record Title Transfer Documents X
Prepare R/W Record Maps
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
13
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXX
X
) 0 0 0 2 9
PROJECT ACTIVITY
District Agreement No. 8-1116
RESPONSIBILITY
STATE COMMISSION
4. PREPARATION of PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES
Prepare and Submit Preliminary Stage Construction Plans X
Review Preliminary Stage Construction Plans X
Calculate and Plot Geometrics X
Cross -Sections & Earthwork Quantities Calculation X
Prepare and Submit BEES Estimate X
Put Estimate in BEES X
Local Review of Preliminary Drainage Plans and
Sanitary Sewer and Adjustment Details X
Prepare & Submit Preliminary Drainage Plans X
Review Preliminary Drainage Plans X
Prepare Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation Plans
and Submit for Review X
Review Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation Plans X
Prepare & Submit Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans X
Review Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans X
Prepare & Submit Preliminary Electrical Plans X
Review Preliminary Electrical Plans X
Prepare & Submit Preliminary Signing Plans X
Review Preliminary Signing Plans X
Quantity Calculations X
Safety Review X X
Prepare Specifications X
Prepare & Submit Checked Structure Plans X
Review & Approve Checked Structure Plans X
Prepare Final Contract Plans X
Prepare Lane Closure Requirements X
Review and Approve Lane Closure Requirements X
Prepare & Submit Striping Plan X
Review & Approve Striping Plan X
Prepare Final Estimate X
Prepare & Submit Draft PS&E X
Review Draft PS&E X
Finalize & Submit PS&E to District X
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
14
n0030
ATTACHMENT 3
DEFINITIONS
Basic Design Features:
District Agreement No. 8-1116
• General description of the facility:
It is proposed to widen Route 74 near the City of Lake Elsinore from a two lane
undivided highway to a four lane divided highway between I-15 in the City of Lake
Elsinore and 7h Street in the City of Perris.
• Rte 74 Intersection with Greenwald Avenue will be signalized.
• The design speed of highway facility is 115 Km/Hr (70 miles/hour).
The number of through lanes will ultimately be four through lanes with a continuous
left turn lane.
The widths of through lanes will be 3.6m, medians will be 4.2m, and shoulders will be
2.4m.
• There are no special features proposed.
• Several of the local roads will be re -aligned at the Intersection with Rte 74 in order to
improve the intersection angle of approach.
• Exceptions to mandatory Design Standards:
Four proposed successive reversing curves within project limits are proposed as non-
superelevated.
• Exceptions to Advisory Design Standards:
Curbs and gutters are proposed along edge of shoulders and along raised median.
DRAFT, December 9, 1999
15
000031
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
February 9, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Budget and Implementation Committee
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
Todd Kurtz, Bechtel Project Coordinator
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Amendment No. 1 to Contract RO-9860 Updating Responsibilities
related to State Route 74 Re -alignment Impacts
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission: 1) review the proposed terms and conditions of Amendment No.
1 to Contract RO-9860 with White Rock Acquisition Co., LP updating RCTC and
property owner responsibilities related to State Route 74 realignment impacts on the
future Ramsgate Development; 2) authorize the Executive Director to negotiate the
deal points for this amendment; and 3) bring back the terms and conditions of the
negotiated amendment for Commission review and approval.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
White Rock Acquisition Co. is currently negotiating final specific plan details with the
City of Lake Elsinore, after which they will be able to commit on the following deal
points. These commitments are expected by the March Commission meeting.
The Measure "A" Strategic Plan includes improvements to Route 74, between 1-15 in
the City of Lake Elsinore and 7th Street in the City of Perris, a length of approximately
8.5 miles. The improvements would widen the existing two-lane roadway to four
lanes with 8 foot shoulders and a continuous 14 foot paved median. The Route 74
improvement project, which once had obtained environmental clearance in 1994, is
now completing an environmental reassessment including consultation with the US
Fish and Wildlife Service and Army Corps of Engineers. An environmental re-
evaluation of the project was required due to the time lapse from the initial approval
and as a result of additional surveys conducted by Caltrans biologists where several
California Gnatcatchers were discovered.
Additionally, significant public support of this project has been evident at RCTC
commission meetings and has resulted in the acceleration of the implementation of the
Route 74 widening project from 1-15 in Lake Elsinore to 7th Street in Perris. At the
0 0032
October 13, 1999 RCTC meeting, the State Route 74 project was accelerated via
approval of agenda item #9.
Consequently, funding and the final engineering/construction schedules have changed
due to the aforementioned discussion. These changes require that Contract RO-9860
between RCTC and White Rock Acquisition Co. LP be amended to reflect the current
project funding and schedule.
The White Rock Acquisition Co. LP, is continuing the process of developing the
Ramsgate Specific Plan property which abuts Route 74 and comprises approximately
1,200 acres located in the City of Lake Elsinore. The current realignment of Route
74 will require significant right-of-way acquisition from White Rock Acquisition Co.
RCTC staff and Legal Counsel are meeting with the developers representatives to
identify project interface issues during the final design process. We will need to
negotiate an amendment to the original White Rock Contract that will provide for
delivery of certain completed work, assurances and funding from White Rock
Acquisition that coincides with the current Route 74 schedule. The intent of the new
amendment is to maximize cooperation between the two parties thereby minimizing
throw away costs at the project interface with the Ramsgate Development.
If an amendment with suitable conditions for RCTC can be worked out, we will present
the final proposal to the Committee and the Commission at their respective meetings
and seek authorization to proceed with the necessary amendment with White Rock
Acquisition.
The most recent deal points of the amendment are listed below for your information
and review as negotiations are continuing between White Rock Acquisition and RCTC
staff.
Deal Points for Amendment No. 1 to Contract RO-9860 with White Rock Acquisition
Co., LP Updating RCTC and Property Owner Responsibilities Related to State Route
74 Re -alignment Impacts on the Future Ramsgate Development.
FIVE ISSUES TO DISCUSS/ADDRESS:
1. Design modifications required on south side of State Route 74 due to future
Ramsgate Development
2. Right-of-way at no cost to RCTC
3. Pump Station Relocations
4. Utility Sleeves
5. Developer Funding Arrangement
-300033
(1) Design modifications required on south side of State Route 74 include:
• additional lane / slope hold back (wider graded roadbed, wider parkway,
face of slope offset to south 27' ± (additional 27' beyond typ. 4-lane
road prism)
• upgraded shoulder pavement thickness for use later as. traveled lane)
• provisions for intersection improvements to meet ultimate condition at
four (4) locations: "A" Street, Ramsgate Drive, Trellis Lane and El Toro
Cutoff.
The three options available:
(a) Design of additional improvements required for Ramsgate Development
within Route 74 final plans being prepared by SC Engineering.
To allow this option, approved rough grade plans for slope would be
needed by 4/1 /00, for SC Engineering to include in 5/5/00 100%
submittal. Construction must be started within 60 days by White Rock
Acquisition, and completed within 90 days of Grading Plan approval.
White Rock to have all required slope and landscape maintenance
agreements executed with City of Lake Elsinore prior to January 2001.
RCTC to be reimbursed for additional pavement thickness on shoulder.
Slope area would be covered under temporary easement until such time
as Ramsgate dedicates slope to the City of Elsinore or maintenance
association.
If grading plans are not completed and approved by City of Lake Elsinore
by 4/1 /00, options (b) and (c) could be used.
(b) Change Order to Route 74 contractor
Approved plans must be available by 1 1 /00 in order to allow pricing and
construction. This option would mean that in order for SC Engineering
plans to move forward through 100% phase, the slope would remain
within state right-of-way. Ramsgate would then be responsible for
acquiring rights to slopes from Caltrans.
RCTC to be reimbursed for additional pavement thickness and slope
modifications and right-of-way expenditures.
:")00034
(c) Stand Alone after Route 74 construction has been completed.
All widening activities to be performed by Ramsgate, RCTC would design
standard four -lane road section only. No additional cost to RCTC, design
and build standard four -lane roadway.
All Route 74 improvements conditioned on Ramsgate by City of Lake
Elsinore (i.e.: curb and gutter, sidewalks, raised median, irrigation,
landscaping, lighting, etc.) to be constructed and paid for by Ramsgate.
(2) Right-of-way along Route 74 to be transferred to RCTC at no cost. This would
most likely occur if option 1(a) is agreed to by both parties.
Any acquisition of remnant parcels as a result of roadway re -alignment will be
between Ramsgate and Caltrans.
(3) Pump Stations — Meadowbrook #1 (nearest to Dexter), and Meadowbrook #2
(near Hammock)
Meadowbrook Pump Station #1
In order to design and build standard road section, Meadowbrook Pump Station
#1 must be abandoned by 1 1 /00, prior to Route 74 construction, otherwise,
RCTC will design and implement a protect -in -place option. Ramsgate will then
be responsible for future abandonment and grading of state right-of-way to
typical section including purchase of (Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
(EVMWD) property to obtain full width right-of-way after abandonment..
Should abandonment occur during Route 74 construction (i.e.: Ramsgate
facilities are brought on line), a change order would be issued to the RCTC
contractor to delete retrofit and abandonment scope. RCTC costs would be
incurred to obtain full width right-of-way.
Meadowbrook Pump Station #2
Similarly to Meadowbrook #1, must be abandoned by 1 1 /00; otherwise without
Ramsgate assistance, RCTC will move pump station as necessary to keep
existing system working. If upgrade is desired due to future Ramsgate
development, cost of upgrade to be borne by Ramsgate.
(4) Utility Sleeves
Design coordination must be complete by 4/1 /00. Installation costs to be
estimated by SC Engineering and to be paid by Ramsgate.
-.00035
(5) Developer Funding Arrangement
Property owner will reimburse RCTC for cost of design and construction of
incremental upgrade to Route 74 improvements due to Ramsgate Development.
Potential Ramsgate Costs
• Differential grading
• Roadway shoulder and intersection upgrade for future lane
• Cost of right-of-way transferred to RCTC
• Abandonment of Meadowbrook Pump Station #1 (if done after Segment #1 is
complete)
• Upgrade of Meadowbrook Pump Station #2
• Sleeves
Potential RCTC Costs
• Temporary protection of Meadowbrook Pump Station #1 .
• Relocation of Meadowbrook Pump Station #2.
000036
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
February 9, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans & Programs Committee
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
Karl Sauer, Bechtel Project Coordinator
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Removal of Temporary platform at Downtown Riverside Metrolink
PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission authorize staff to obtain bids for the removal of the temporary
platform and the re -installation of the safety fencing between tracks at the Riverside
Downtown Metrolink Station. The results will be brought back to the Commission for
future action and possible award.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Before the Southside Platform was constructed at the Riverside Downtown Station,
there was a need to be able to pickup and deliver passengers to the Riverside
Downtown Station north -side platforms from the BN&SF north main track. This
required the construction of a temporary asphalt platform and the removal of a portion
of the safety fencing between the tracks. Now that the Southside Platform is
completed and in operation, BN&SF has requested that we remove the temporary
asphalt platform and restore the fencing to remove a potential safety concern. The
BN&SF dispatchers will direct all future Metrolink trains using the BN&SF San
Bernardino subdivision to the Southside Platform at the Riverside Downtown Station.
In037
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$25,000 to $30,000
Source of Funds
Prop. 108 and 116 funds
(Y/N)
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
Y
Year
Included in Program Budget
Y
Year Programmed
00
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
00
Budget Adjustment Required
n
Financial Impact Not Applicable
100038
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
DATE:
February 9, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Budget and Implementation Committee
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Planning and Programming
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Amendment to FY 2000-2004 Measure A Capital Improvement Plan
for the County of Riverside
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve an amendment to the FY 2000-2004 Measure A Five -
Year Capital Improvement Plan for the County of Riverside as submitted.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Measure A Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and road monies to
annually provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be
expended in order to receive their annual disbursement of funds. Any subsequent
additions, deletions, or substitutions to the Plan must be submitted to the Commission
for approval.
The County of Riverside's Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan was
approved by the Commission at its July 14, 1999 meeting. On December 7, 1999,
the Board of Supervisors approved the 2000 annual edition of their Transportation
Improvement Plan which updates the plan previously approved by the Commission.
The County is requesting an amendment to their Plan in order to include the updated
information.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$46,086,000 over 5 years
Source of Funds
Measure A Local Streets and Roads
(Y/N)
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
Y
Year
Included in Program Budget
Y
Year Programmed
99/00
Approved Allocation
Y
Year of Allocation
99/00
Budget Adjustment Required
N
Financial Impact Not Applicable
Attachment
000039
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TRANSPORTATION AND
LAND MAAA GEMENT AGENCY
Transportation Department
December 9, 1999
Mr. Eric Haley, Deputy Executive Director
Riverside County Transportation Commission
3560 University Avenue, Suite 100
Riverside, CA 92501
ATTN: Cathy Bechtel
RE: Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Program
Dear Mr. Haley:
David E. Barnhart
Director of Transportation `
On December 7, 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved the 1999/2000 annual edition
of the Transportation Improvement Program for Riverside County. Attached is the
updated five year program of projects for the County's portion of Measure "A" funds as
incorporated in this recently approved TIP. We have scheduled expenditures based on
revenue projections received from your Agency dated May 13, 1999, plus unspent funds
from prior years fiscal years.
This five year program supersedes the previous report approved by the RCTC on July 14,
1999.
If you have any questions concerning this program, please contact George Johnson,
Deputy Director of Transportation, at (909) 955-6740.
Sin
Y,
I — S
avid E. Barnhart
Director of Transportation
RKN:It
attachment
cc: George Johnson
Scott Barber/Karen Pemble
408(I Lemon Street. Rth Floor • Riverside. California 92501 • (909) 955_6740
P.O. Box 10Q0 • Riverside, California 9250'-1090 • FAX Mg) 955-6721
000040
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 1
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
03rd St
Hammond Rd
0.28 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Dale Kiler Rd
28 (ft)/ 28 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
301
other
Total
06th St
D St
0.33 (mi)
Grind and Resurf
to Palm Ave
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
07th St
Date Palm St
0.25 (mi.)
Resurface Paved Road
to Dale Kiler Rd
20 (ft)/ 20 (ft)
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
10th Ave
C 8 D Blvd to Intake Blvd (Rte 95)
1.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Reconst and widen road
Coordinate with the City of Blythe for paving
the south 1/2 of the road.
18th Ave
Arrowhead Blvd to DeFrain Blvd
1.00 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurf RMS paved road
302
other
Total
302
other
Total
55th Ave
Calhoun St to Coachella CL
0.50 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 22' RMS
Coordinate with City of Coachella for part of
the project.
64th St
Downey St to Archer St
0.55 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurf AC paved road
as part of a Flood Control storm drain project.
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 102/03 1 03/04
40
40
D
E
R
0
0
0
0
0 0 2 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 37 0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
82
0
82
25
0
25
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
73
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0 2 0
0 1 0
0 0 0
0 22 0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
114
227
341
88
0
88
35
14
49
D
E
R
C
20
1
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
93 0
302 Measure A/Palo Verde
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
1
1
0
86
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
302 Measure A/Palo Verde
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
3
1
0
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18 D 0 0 0
E 0 0 0
R 0 0 0
0 C 18 0 0
18
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t)00041
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 2
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
73rd Ave
Windlass Dr
0.16 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Ely Windlass Dr .16 mi
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
301
other
Total
84th Ave
Rte 86 to Johnson St
0.80 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 24' RMS
301
other
Total
Acacia Ave
Hemet CL to 100' east of Columbia
0.72 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft)
Reconstruct 38'paved road
Drainage problems; Do Not raise crown elevation
of street.
300
other
Total
Academy Dr
University Ave to Cornell St
0.20 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM
300
other
Total
Aintree Dr
Excelsior St
0.21 (mi)
Resurf 24', 0.25' RMS
to Rushmore Ave
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Airport Blvd
Jackson St to Wly 0.5 mi from Monroe
1.50 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 38' A/C
City of La Ouinta is not participating in
this project.
Albatross Way
Vander Veer Rd to 72nd Ave
0.24 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurface AC paved road
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 103/04
26 D 0
E 0
R 0
0 C 0
26
104
0
104
0
�0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
23
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
391
409
50
0
50
40
0
40
7
27
34
24
0
24
15
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
44
300 Measure
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
37
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
21
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t�10042
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 3
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Alberta Ave
Swingle Ave to Wly 0.15 mi
0.15 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS
Angel Way
Malibar Ave to S'ly 0.05 mi
0.05 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with ARM
301
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x $1000
21
0
21
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 103/04
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
18
0
0
0
0
-301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
300
other
Total
Angela Dr
Sycamore Rd
0.44 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to 16th Ave
33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
301
other
Total
Antelope Rd
Scott Rd
1.53 (mi)
Resurf with 0.17' AHRM
to Craig Ave
23 (ft)/ 23 (ft)
Apache Tr
Bonita Ave
0.56 (m1)
Resurf 24', 0.33' RMS
to 1-10
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Arrowhead Blvd
18th Ave
1.00 (mi)
Resurf 26',0.21'RMS
to 20th Ave
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
302
other
Total
Aruba Ct
Port Royal Ave
0.02 (mi)
Reconstruct Surface
to Nly Port Royal 0.02 mi
32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
301
other
Total
19
0
19
5
1
0
13
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
59
0
59
206
0
206
75
0
75
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
56
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
1
0
186
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
72
0
0
0
. 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
103
0
103
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
101
302 Measure A/Palo Verde
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
14
0
14
2
1
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
�)00'043
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 4
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Auld Rd
SH 79
0.34 (mi)
Resurf 50', 0.25' RMS
to Briggs Rd
50 (ft)/ 50 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
Avenida Gracia
Camino Idilio to Nly
0.20 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft)
Recon 36',0.5'0G,0.21'RMS
301
other
Total
Avenida Miravilla
Avenida San Timoteo
1.70 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to County Line
19 (ft)/ 19 (ft)
Beachcomber Way
69th Ave
0.25 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to Admiralty Wy
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Beckman Dr
.Jackson St to Wily end
0.12 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft)
Resurf AC paved road
Bedford Ct
Pebble Beach Dr to SW'ly 0.03 mi
0.03 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.21' AC
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
Bellegrave Ave
Hamner Ave
2.13 (mi)
Reconstruct AC surface
to Etiwanda Ave
40 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
'QQ044
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
70
70
42
0
42
157
0
157
49
0
49
29
0
29
13
0
13
159
787
946
2
1
0
67
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
0
0
1
0
E 0
0
0
1
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
0
40
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
D 2
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 154
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
2
1
0
46
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
24
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
7
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
0
0
131
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 5
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x $1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
Belmont Ct
Piping Rock Rd to S'ly Piping Rock .09mi
0.09 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
300
other
Total
Big Pine St
Jeffery Pine Rd
0.20 (mi)
Resurf 26',0.17'AC
to•Silver Fir Dr
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Blue Hill Dr
Griffith Dr to Crews Hills Dr
0.17 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
300
other
Total
17
0
17
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
E
R
C
5
1
0
11
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
20 D 0 0 2
E 0 0 1
R 0 0 0
0 C 0 0 17
20
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bohlen Rd
Mitchell Rd Nly
0.50 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Widen, Const 26',0.5'0G,0.21'RMS w/Berms
Bowden Dr
Hopewell Ave
0.25 (mi)
Recon AC surface
to Cambridge Ave
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Box Canyon Rd
I-10
7.00 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Shavers Well
28 (ft)/ 28 (ft)
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
Bradley Rd
Cherry Hills Blvd to McCall Blvd
0.38 (mi) 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft)
Resurf AC paved road
Misc funds are from EMWD.
300
other
Total
27 D 5 0 0
E 1 0 0
R 0 0 0
0 C 21 0 0
27
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
103 D 0 0 0
E 0 0 0
R 0 0 0
0 C 0 0 0
103
55
0
55
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
100
D
E
R
C
5 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
950 D 0 0 0 0
E 0 0 0 0
R 0 0 0 0
1846 C 0 0 0 0
2796
52
70
122
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
950
D 0 0 0
E 0 0 0
R 0 0 0
C 52 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i000045
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 6
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Bradley Rd
Estate Dr to Cherry Hills Blvd
0.51 (mi) 62 (ft)/ 62 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Briarwood Ave
Stanford St
0.25 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Meridian St
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Brookside Ave
Cherry Ave
1.00 (mi)
Resurf 30',0.17'AC
SB 300 Cycle 9.
to Highland Springs Ave
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Brookside Ave
Nancy Ave
0.80 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Beaumont Ave
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Bundy Canyon Rd
Harvest Wy
1.85 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
Note: 17% is in SD #1
SB 300 Cycle 9.
to Murrieta Rd
25 (ft)/ 25 (ft)
Bundy Canyon Rd
a Sellers Rd
0.25 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Widen roadway for left turn lanes
for East bound traffic
SB 300 Cycle 9.
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Bundy Canyon Rd
Oak Circle Dr
0.00 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Widen roadway for left turn pocket
for west bound traffic
SB 300 Cycle 9.
:)00046
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 100/01 101/02 102/03 03/04
191
191
18
1
0
1
0
A
0
171
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
61
0
61
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
0
54
136
0
136
4
1
0
131
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
117
0
117
357
0
357
73
0
73
27
0
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
108
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
357
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
73
300 Measure
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 7
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Burgess Way
Westover Wy to Windsor Dr
0.08 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Butler Bay
Nevis Pl
0.10 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
Cabana Cir
Beachcomber Wy
0.04 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Trinity Cir
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
18
0
18
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
30
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
to Wly Beachcomber.04 mi
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Cajalco Rd
Seaton Ave to Clark St
1.50 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
Widen and recon 40', 0.5'AB, 0.25'AC
Cajalco Rd
La Sierra Ave
3.00 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Wily 3 mi
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Cajalco Rd a 2 intersections
La Sierra and Lk Matt
0.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
Widen and resurf 750' Ely/Wly for turn pockets
Intersections @ La Sierra and Lake Mathews.
Calle De Las Flores
Clearwater Wy
0.31 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
9
0
9
41
720
761
1319
0
1319
130
0
130
to Snow View Dr
17 (ft)/ 17 (ft)
301
other
Total
55
0
55
2
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
0
0
0
0
E 0
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 41
. 0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
D 0
0
0
100
0
E 0
0
0
3
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
0
466
750
300 Measure A/Western
D 0
0
0
10
0
E 0
0
0
20
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
0
0
100
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
49
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
�00047
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 8
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Cambridge Ave
42nd Ave to Jamaica Sands Dr
0.31 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Resurf 35',0.21'AC W/Petromat
SB 300 Cycle 9.
Camellia Dr
Yale St to Lois Ct
0.23 (mi) 30. (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC, 0.12' AHRM
Fund
Source
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x 81000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x 81000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 03/04
75
0
75
51
0
51
Camino Aventura
Avenida Descanso to Bubbling Wells
0.75 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Reconstruct 0.50'AB, 0.21'AC
Camino ldilio
Avenida Gracia to Bubbling Wells Rd
0.30 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Recon 35',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
Capilano Dr
Piping Rock Rd to Wentworth Dr
'0.26 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AIM
Captains Walk
Spinnaker Wy
0.14 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Hallyard Dr
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
Carol Dr
Dillon Rd
0.50 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to 16th Ave ,
33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
301
other
Total
6
494
500
0
0
0
75
o o o
o 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
45
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
57
0
57
41
0
41
24
0
24
64
0
64
1
1
0
55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
35
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
61
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r0048
i
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 9
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Case St
Hayes Ave to Grand Ave
0.30 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG
Central Ave
San Jacinto St
0.12 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to E'ly San Jacinto .12mi
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Chabela Dr
Soboba Rd
0.07 (mi)
Grind and Resurf
to San Jose Dr
32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Chambers Ave
Murrieta Rd
0.95 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Bradley Rd
60 (ft)/ 60 (ft)
Champagne Cir
Sequoia Ln
0.05 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to S'ly Sequoia 0.05 mi
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Chaparral Dr - Part II
Avenida Ortega to Los Ranchos Cir
2.20 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurf 24'-28', 0.25' RMS
Cherry Cove
Calle De Las Flores
0.14 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Palm Oasis Ave
34 (ft)/ 34 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
102
0
102
39
0
39
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 103/04
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
100
300 Measure A/Western.
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
33
23
0
23
423
0
423
21
0
21
233
0
233
49
0
49
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
17
D
E
R
C
20
2
0
401
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
15
D
E
R
C
2
1
0
230
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
43
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
t�00049
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 10
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x 81000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x 81000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 103/04
Cherry Hills Blvd
Murrieta Blvd
0.42 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Valley Blvd
62 (ft)/ 62 (ft)
300
other
Total
3
115
118
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Chickadee Way
Robin Dr
0.05 (mi)
Resurf 26',0.17'AC
to Ply End
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Design for groundwater and drainage problems.
300
other
Total
12
0
12
Churchill St
Hayes Ave to Nly
0.46 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.51DG
300
other
Total
Clark St
Martin St to Markham St
0.50 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Pulverize, Resurf 0.30' AC
Clearwater Way
.Calle De Las Flores
0.16 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to S'ly Palm Oasis 0.05mi
17 (ft)/ 17 (ft)
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
127
0
127
78
0
78
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
1
0
0
0
E 0
1
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
125
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
7
1
0
70
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
0
32
Clinton Keith Rd
Tenaja Rd
1.20 (mi)
Reconst road
to Avenida La Cresta
24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
300
other
Total
Clinton Keith Rd
Avenida La Cresta to Murrieta City Limits
1.65 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Reconst road
Coordinate with the City of Murrieta for the
west half of 0.3 miles of road.
High ground water is caysing road failure.
300
other
Total
282
0
282
380
0
380
i)00050
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
26
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
278
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
5
0
0
0
0
0
355
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 11
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Clinton St
Miles Ave
0.25 (mi)
Resurface 0.21', 56' AC
to Sly to CL
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Coordinate with City of Indio for 1/2 of
project.
Fund
Source
Total
301
other
Total
Coachella Valley Area
various roads
6.00 (mi)
Resurf
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Colgate Ct
Fulton Ave to S'ly 0.05 mi
0.05 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
301
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
54
30
84
663
484
1147
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
2
0
0
0
15
1
0
36
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
200
0
1
0
200
0
1
0
260
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
Collegian Way
Columbia St to Major Dr
0.19 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM
Collegian Way
Cornell St to E'ly 0.12 mi
0.12 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Compass Dr
72nd Ave to Windlass Dr
0.16 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 33' RMS
Contour Ave
Hansen Ave to Ely
0.66 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon RMS paved road
Construct in summer when school is out.
Water crosses over the road.
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
13
0
13
50
0
50
32
0
32
21
0
21
5
1
0
7
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
44
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
26
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
236 D 35
E 1
R 0
0 C 0
236
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i)00051
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 12
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x $1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x $1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 100/01 01/02 02/03 f 03/04
Coral St
Calle De Las Flores
0.19 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Sily Palm Oasis 0.05mi
34 (ft)/ 34 (ft)
301
other
Total
65
65
D 0
E 0
R 0
C 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6 0
1 0
0 0
58 0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
Corydon St
Grand Ave to Mission Tr
1.56 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Resurf AC paved road
1/2 in the City of Lake Elsinore. Pursue coop
w/City. Funds represent half width improvements.
Coordinate w/ left turn lane project B0-0642.
300
other
Total
374
0
374
Cozy Cir
Sequoia Ln
0.04 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to S'ly Sequoia 0.04 mi
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
300
other
Total
Crews Hill Dr
Wily Griffith 0.03 mi to Blue Hill Dr
0.16 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Crystal Springs Dr
Calle De Las Flores
0.15 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Palm Oasis Ave
34 (ft)/ 34 (ft)
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
19
0
19
25
0
25
52
0
52
De Portola Rd
Anza Rd
2.00 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Pauba Rd
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
300
other
Total
De Portola Rd
Pauba Rd to Wily 2.0 mi
2.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Reconstruct AC paved road
SB 300 Cycle 9
?�Q052
300
other
Total
306
0
306
317
0
317
D
E
R
C
30
2
0
342
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
13
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
19
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
46
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
20
1
0
285
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
316
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 13
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
De Portola Rd
S'ly Monte De Oro .5mi to Glen Oaks Rd
2.25 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Reconst AC paved road
Delano Dr
Toll Gate Rd
0.27 (mi)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
to Nly end
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Dillon Rd
Worsley to Diablo Rd
1.00 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft)
Overlay with RMS
Coordinate with City of Palm Springs for 10%
share of project
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
1310
0
1310
27
0
27
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 103/04
D
E
R
140
35
0
3
0
0
0
567
0
0
0
565
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dillon Rd
48th Ave to SH 86
0.67 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Resurface 30', 0.21' AC
SE 300 Cycle 9 applied for.
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
85
10
95
165
0
165
Dillon Rd
Palm Dr
2.50 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Long Canyon Rd
50 (ft)/ 50 (ft)
301
other
Total
Double View Dr
Middle Ridge Dr SWIy
1.66 (mi)
Resurf 241,0.17'AC
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Doman St
Broomall Ave to Grand Ave
0.23 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
7
750
757
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
82
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
165
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 5
0
0
0
0
E 0
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 2
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
163
0
163
77
0
77
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
160
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
75
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W300k53
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 14
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
Dufferin Ave 300 35 D
Lyon Ave to La Sierra Ave E
0.23 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) R
Resurf RMS paved road other 0 C
Total 35
East Posey Dr 300 47 D
De Weide Ave to NE'ly De Weide 0.15 mi E
0.15 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R
Grind and Resurf other 0 C
Total 47
Ebb Dr 301 14 D
Schoal Dr to Rocky Point Dr E
0.12 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R
Resurface 0.21', 30' RMS other 0 C
Total 14
El Rancho Dr 300 77 D
Bradley Rd to Piping Rock Rd E
0.48 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) R
Grind and Resurf with AHRM other 0 C
Total 77
Elaine Dr 301 59 D
Sycamore Rd to 16th Ave E
'0.44 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R
Resurf RMS paved road other 0 C
Total 59
Elberta Rd 300 50 D
Mission Tr to Mesa Dr E
0.30 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R
Resurf 26', 0.25' RMS other 0 C
Total 50
99/00 100/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
2
1
0
32
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
41
1
1
0
12
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
7 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0
69 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Measure
0 2
0 1
0 0
0 56
A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
2 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0
47 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
Elsa Ct 300 17 D 5
Lois Ct to Camellia Dr E 1
0.05 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R 0
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM other 0 C 11
Total 17
)00054
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 15
DEC 7, 1999
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Esperanza Ave
Broadway St
1.75 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to E'ly
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Estate Dr
Bradley Rd to Piping Rock Rd
0.05 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E.= Environmental C = Construction
255
0
255
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 103/04
D
E
R
C
2
1
0
252
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
other
Total
Ethanac Rd
Murrieta Rd to E'ly to Perris C.L.
0.75 (mi) 12 (ft)/ 12 (ft)
Reconst South side of road
Coordinate with City for north side of road.
Excelsior St
Penland Rd
0.39 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to N'ly end
40 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
Florence Dr
Dillon Rd
0.50 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to 16th Ave
33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Fordham Dr
Trenton Wy to Windsor Dr
0.09 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Four Chimneys Rd
Delano Dr
0.10 (mi)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
to Wly End
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
15
0
15
193
0
193
121
0
121
64
0
64
19
0
19
11
0
11
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
9
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
I0 35
0 1
0 0
0 157
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 2
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 118
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/W stern
D 0
2
0
0
0
E 0
1
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
.61
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
D 5
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 13
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-i100055
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 16
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fred Waring Dr E. Clinton St
Indio C.L. to Wily Silverwood Dr
0.58 (mi) 64 (ft)/110 (ft)
Widen street and Const sidewalk
Sidewalk includes the west side of Clinton St
from Fred Waring Dr to Riverlane Dr.
Fulton Ave
Dartmouth St to Stanford St
0.27 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Fund
Source
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x 81000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x 81000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
211
48
259
99/00 00/01 ( 01/02 02/03 03/04
0 8 0 0 0 0
E 0 0 0 0 0
R 0 0 0 0 0
C 203 0 0 0 0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
36 D 5 0 0
E 1 0 0
R 0 0 0
0 C 30 0 0
36
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Garbani Rd
Murrieta Rd to Evans Rd
0.43 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Recon 24'-53', 0.5' AB, 0.29' AC
Width varies from 24' to 53'.
300
other
Total
Gavilan Rd
Cajalco Rd
0.85 (mi)
Resurf paved road
to S'ly 0.85 mi
24 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Gavilan Rd
Lake Mathews Dr to Eldridge Dr
2.20 (mi) 21 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Reconstr and widen road
Gilman Springs Rd
SE'ly Jack Rabbit Tr to Wily Bridge St
1.80 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Reconst and widen AC Paved Road
Coordinate w/project A2-0433 in Supv. Dist. 3.
Gilman Springs Rd
SE'ly Bridge St
1.90 (mi)
Reconst AC Paved Rd
to SH 79 (Sanderson Rd)
26 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
159
0
159
D
E
R
C
15
1
0
143
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
188
0
188
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
300 Measure A/Western
3
2
0
183
0
0
0
0
248
470
718
874
1756
2630
2120
0
2120
D
E
R
c
0
18
10
220
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
10
0
36
0
10
0
0
818
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
125
30
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
15
0
30
0
0
0
0
960
0
0
0
960
1►00056
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 17
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Gilman Springs Rd 2 locations
NWily Jack Rabbit Tr to SE'ly Bridge St
0.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Recon, realign
STP Funds App'd = S2,504k.
See A7-0310 in Supv.Dist.5 for companion project
Glenoaks Rd
Rancho California Rd
2.76 (mi)
Resurf 26',0.21'AC
tally
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Granada Way
Costa Mesa Dr to Beach Comber Way
0.16 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS
Greenwald Ave
SH 74 to Scenic Crest Dr
1.55 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Pulverize, Resurf 0.33' AC
Project is 25% in SD #3
Greenwald Ave
Scenic Crest Dr to Lake Elsinore C.L.
0.19 (mi) 14 (ft)/ 14 (ft)
Resurf 0.21' AC
Coordinate with City of lake Elsinore for
west 1/2 of road.
Griffith Dr
El Rancho Dr to Crews Hills Dr
0.20 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Hansen Ave
10th St to Montgomery Ave
1.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon 26',0.5'0G,0.21'RMS w/berms
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x $1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
134
2954
3088
354
0
354
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
134
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
350
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
0
23
375
0
375
53
0
53
36
0
36
1
1
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
40
1
0
334
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
42
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
30
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
203
0
203
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
200
►J00057
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 18
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Helen Ave
Clinton Ave to Wly 0.4 mi
0.40 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS
Helm Cir
Beacon Dr
0.30 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to N'ly Beacon Dr 0.3 mi
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Hempstead Ct
E'ly Windsor 0.05 mi to Wily Windsor 0.04 mi
0.09 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Hermitage Dr
Nly 42nd Av 0.15 mi to Nly 42nd Av 0.24 mi
0.09 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft)
Remove and Replace AC Surface
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Total
301 50
other 0
Total 50
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 03/04
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
47
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
301 7
other 0
Total 7
D 0 0 2 0
E 0 0 1 0
R 0 0 0 0
C 0 0 4 0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
300 19
other 0
Total 19
301 30
other 0
Total 30
Highgrove Area
various streets
0.00 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Holland Rd
Bradley Rd
0.75 (mi)
Const AC Paved Road
to Haun Rd
0 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Holland Rd
Murrieta Rd
0.47 (mi)
Resurf 24', 0.25' RMS
to Byers St
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
i.noo5s
D 5 0 0
E 1 0 0
R 0 0 0
C 13 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 5 0 0 0
E 1 0 0 0
R 0 0 0 0
C 24 0 0 0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
300 820
other 0
Total 820
300 124
other 420
Total 544
300 65
other 0
Total 65
D 0 0 0
E 0 0 0
R 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
90
10
0
720
D 20 0 0
E 10 0 0
R 0 0 0
C 94 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 2 0 0
E 1 0 0
R 0 0 0
C 62 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
l
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 19
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Hopewell Ave
42nd Ave to N'ly end
0.26 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft)
Recon AC surface
Ironwood Ave
Theodore Ave
1.37 (mi)
to Badlands Landfill
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Reimburse Waste Management for advanced
funds on Project A2-0507.
Jackie Dr
Poppy Dr to S'ly 0.22 mi
0.22 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Fund
Source
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
50
0
50
280
0
280
99/00 00/01 101/02 1 02/03 1 03/04
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
70
0
0
0
70
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
70
0
0
0
70
D
0
0
0
300
other
Total
Jamaica Sands Dr
42nd Ave to N'ly 42nd Ave 0.46 mi
0.46 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft)
Resurface Paved Road w/Fabric
Jamestown Dr
Windsor Dr to Trenton Wy
0.08 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Jeffery Pine Rd
Cedar Glen Dr Wly
0.30 (mi)
Resurf 261,0.17'AC
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
John Muir Rd
Fern Valley Rd
0.27 (mi)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
to Seneca Dr
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
64
0
64
107
0
107
18
0
18
35
0
35
30
0
30
D
E
R
C
6
1
0
57
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
1
0
96
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 5
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 12
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
D 0
0
0
2
0
E 0
0
0
1
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
0
32
0
3U0 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
2
1
0
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
!)00059
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 20
DEC 7, 1999
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Johnston Ave
San Jacinto St to Ply Stanford 0.12 mi
1.68 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
Juniper Flats Rd
Juniper Springs to Sly
1.61 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon 26',0.5'0G,0.21'RMS W/Berms
Jurupa Rd
Etiwanda Ave
2.90 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Poinsetta Pl
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
La Cienega Dr
Lakeview Terrace
0.06 (mi)
Resurf 26', 0.25' RMS
to Mesa Dr
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
La Sierra Ave
El Sobrante Rd to Cleveland Ave
1.90 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 64 (ft)
Widen to 4 lane Mtn. Arterial Hwy
Agreement with Victoria Grove,LLC.
La Vida Dr
Calle De Las Flores
0.18 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
to Palm Oasis Ave
34 (ft)/ 34 (ft)
Lake Ln
Idyllbrook Dr
0.22 (mi)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
to Marian View Dr
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
.)00060
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
307
0
307
202
0
202
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 03/04
D 30
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 276
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
200
833
0
833
15
0
15
524
500
1024
61
0
61
25
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 160
3
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
670
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
12
300 Measure
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
524
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
0
54
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
2
1
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 21
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
( comments )
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Lake Mathews Dr
Gavilan Rd
1.25 (mi)
Recon RMS paved road
to Wly 1.25 Mi.
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Lake Mathews Dr
1.25 Mi Wly Gavilan Rd to 2.25 Mi Wly Gavilan Rd
1.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon RMS paved road
Lake St
Acacia Ave
1.00 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Stetson Ave
21 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Lakeview Ave
Ramona Expressway to Nuevo Rd
3.05 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Resurf 30', 0.25' AC
Consider adding turn lanes at Post Office.
Larksong St
Plumrose St to Whittier St
0.09 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Leeward Dr
72nd Ave to Sly 0.34 mi
0.34 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 30' RMS
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
Leon Rd
Olive Ave to N'ly 0.13 mi
0.13 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Const AC paved road
This project will complete a segment deleted
from project A7-0303. Environmental clearance
and design was done under A7-0303.
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
347
0
347
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 1 03/04
0
0
0
0
20
1
0
0
0
0
0
326
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
328
0
328
195
0
195
547
0
547
17
0
17
39
0
39
54
0
54
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
10
1
0
0
0
0
0
317
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
20
1
0
174
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
25
2
0
520
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
11
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 2
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 36
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
4
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.)00061
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 22
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Leon Rd (3 segments)
SH 79 (N) to Keller Rd to Olive Rd to Simpson Rd
5.10 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Construct AC paved road
Third segment Scott Rd to Holland Rd.
Limonite Ave
Etiwanda Ave to I-15
1.50 (mi) 48 (ft)/ 48 (ft)
Reconstruct road surface
Exist R/W is 85-160 ft.
Lindsay Ave
25th Ave to Warmington
0.20 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft)
Resurf 0.21'AC
SB 300 Cycle 9 applied for.
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
446
1864
2310
248
882
1130
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 103/04
25
5
2
414
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
2
0
3
0
0
0
193
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
Live Oak Canyon Rd
San Timoteo Cyn Rd
2.15 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to S.B. County Line
24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Lockhart Ln
Jackie Dr to Ply 0.07 mi
0.07 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Locovia Ct
Port Royal Ave
0.02 1mi)
Recon AC surface
to N'ly end
32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
302
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
Lois Ct
Elsa Ct to Columbia St
0.20 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
300
other
Total
)00062
29
0
29
360
0
360
23
0
23
16
0
16
41
0
41
0
0
0
29
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
302 Measure A/Palo Verde
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
2
0
338
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 5
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 17
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
3
1
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
35
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 23
DEC 7, 1999
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Lookout Dr
Vanderveer Rd
0.45 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Seaview Wy
40 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
301
other
Total
Lorimer St
Grand Ave to Sly
0.30 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG
Los Alamos Rd
Murrieta C.L.
0.77 (mi)
Resurf 27', 0.25' RMS
to E'ly 0.77 mi
27 (ft)/ 27 (ft)
Los Caballos
Pauba Ave
1.34 (mi)
Recon RMS paved road
to SH79
24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Major Dr
Academy Dr to Collegian Wy
0.04 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM
Malaga Rd
Mission Tr to Ely
0.35 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Resurf 261,0.17'AC
Coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore for
the north 1/2 of street.
Malibar Ave
Yale St to E'ly 0.12 mi
0.12 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
81
0
81
102
0
102
106
0
106
252
0
252
16
0
16
40
0
40
32
0
32
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 103/04
D 2
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 78
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
300 Measure
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
A/Western
1
1
0
100
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
103
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
250
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
10
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
0
2
0
0
E 0
0
1
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
37
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
5
1
0
26
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1)00063
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 24
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Description
(comments)
Fund
Source
Fund
Source
Amount
x $1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
Total
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
Maple Rd •
Atlantic Ave to Nancy Dr
0.31 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Resurf RMS paved road
301
other
49
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
301 Measure
0
0
0
0
A/Coachella
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Valley
2
1
0
46
Total
49
Marian View Dr
SH243 Wly
0.40 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
300
other
42
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
300 Measure
0
0
0
0
A/Western
2
1
0
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
42
Mariposa Rd
Lakeview Terrace to Mission Tr
0.21 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft)
Resurf 25', 0.25' RMS
300
other
45
0
D
E
R
C
2
1
0
42
300 Measure
0
0
0
0
A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
45
Market St Bridge Guardrail
0.42 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Reconst bridge guardrails
Total HBRR funds App'd = S180K
300
other
27
160
D 0
E 0
R 0
C 10
300 Measure
0
0
0
17
A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
207
Mauna Loa Dr
Mojave Nly
0.31 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Recon 32',0.5'0G,0.21'RMS
301
other
48
0
D 0
E 0
R 0
C 0
301 Measure
0
0
0
0
A/Coachella
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Valley
2
1
0
45
Total
48
Mayberry Ave
Columbia St to Dartmouth St
0.50 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
Recon AC paved road
300
other
300
0
D 50
E 2
R 0
C 248
300 Measure
0
0
0
0
A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
300
Mayberry Ave
Soboba St to Hemet St
0.25 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft)
Resurf. AC paved road
_
300
other
55
0
D 0
E 0
R 0
C 0
300 Measure
0
0
0
0
A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
49
Total
55
410064
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 25
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Mc Call Blvd
Valley Blvd
1.30 (mi)
Resurface AC paved road
to I-215
72 (ft)/ 72 (ft)
Mc Mahon Rd
Middle Ridge Rd
0.07 (mi)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
McAllister St
Riverside CL
1.00 (mi)
Realign and recon
to Marian View Dr
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
40
1037
1077
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x $1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 1 03/04
D
E
R
35
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
12
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
9
0
0
0
0
to Sly
26 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
McKinney Ln
Canyon Dr to Wily end
0.13 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Resurf 26',0.17'AC
Design for groundwater and drainage problems.
Meadow Glen Dr
Double View Dr. to Idyllbrook Dr
0.34 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
Coordinate with waterline work
Menifee Rd
San Jacinto Ave to 1.0 mi Sly
1.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Reconstruct AC paved road
Menifee Rd
1 mi Sly San Jacinto to 2 mi Sly San Jacinto
1.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Reconstruct AC paved road
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
550
0
550
27
0
27
36
0
36
32
370
402
23
3n
393
60
50
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
340
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
6
0
0
0
E 0
1
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
20
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
32
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 20
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 10
0
0
0
0
C 1
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
16
1
5
1
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i�00065
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 26
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Menifee Rd
SH74 to N'ly
1.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Reconstruct AC paved road
Middle Ridge Dr
ldyllmont Rd to Mc Mahon Rd
1,07 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
Coordinate with waterline work
Mira Loma Area
various roads
8.00 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Mission Tr
Corydon St to Malaga Rd
1.50 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 48 (ft)
Reconst and widen AC paved road
Half in the City of Lake Elsinore
300
other
Total
Mojave Rd
Carol Dr
0.10 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to Nancy Dr
33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
301
other
Total
Monte Vista Dr
Baxter Rd
1.23 (mi)
Resurf 28',0.21'AC
to Bundy Canyon Rd
36 (ft)/ 36 (ft)
300
other
Total
Murrieta Rd
Scott Rd
1.75 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Corson Ave
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
�00066
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
2
385
387
105
0
105
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 103/04
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
3
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
95
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
830
0
830
417
1578
1995
19
0
19
174
0
174
450
0
450
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
10
0
720
19
11
25
266
0
0
0
96
300 Measure A/W stern
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
16
D 0
0
3
0
0
E 0
0
1
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
170
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
45
2
0
403
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 27
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Nandina Ave
Barton St to Clark St
1.52 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Pulverize, Resurf 0.30' AC
300
other
Total
Neptune Dr
Flamingo Dr
0.25 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Nly Via CostaBrava.2mi
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Nevis Pl
Butler Bay PI
0.09 (mi)
Reconstruct Surface
to Trinity Cir
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
New Bedford Rd
Westover Wy to Windsor Dr
0.09 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
New Chicago Ave
Atto Dr to Acacia Ave
0.13 (mi) 16 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon surface and widen road
North Shore Dr
Flamingo Dr
0.27 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Nly Via CostaBrava.lmi
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Nuevo Rd
Dunlap Dr
2.60 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Lakeview Ave
28 (ft)/ 28 (ft)
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
258
0
258
44
0
44
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
25
1
0
232
0
0
0
0
I00 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
41
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
30
0
30
19
0
19
205
• 0
205
47
0
47
455
0
455
5
1
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
13
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
21
2
0
182
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
44
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
20
2
0
433
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t)00067
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 28
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Oakmont Dr
Bradley Rd
0.50 (mi)
Resurf 36',0.17' AC
to Thornhill Dr
36 (ft)/ 36 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
Oreana Way
Calle De Las Flores
0.20 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
Palm Oasis Ave
Snow View Dr
0.36 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Palm Oasis Ave
34 (ft)/ 34 (ft)
301
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 103/04
146
146
15
1
0
130
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
67
0
67
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
0
60
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
to Clearwater Wy
34 (ft)/ 34 (ft)
301
other
Total
Palo Verde Area
various roads
0.00 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Palomar Rd
San Jacinto Rd
0.28 (mi)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
to Dickenson Rd
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Par Dr
Thornhill Dr to Olympia Way
0.26' (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Resurf 321,0.21' AC Petromat
302
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Pauba Rd
SH79 to De Portola Rd
2.34 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon RMS paved road
300
other
Total
`)00V68
121
0
121
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
0
109
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
310
294
604
31
0
31
38
0
38
508
0
508
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
302 Measure A/Palo Verde
0
0
0
175
0
0
0
135
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
28
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
5
3
0
500
0
0
0
0
r
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 29
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
_(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Pebble Beach Dr
Cherry Hills Blvd to McCall Blvd
0.37 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
300 153 0 15 0 0
E 1 0 0
R 0 0 0
other 0 C 137 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
Total 153
Pedley Area
various roads
7.00 (mi)
Resurf AC paved roads
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Peralta PI
Riverview Dr
0.69 (mi)
Resurf AC Paved Rd
to Limonite Ave
40 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
300 270 D 0 0
E 0 0
R 0 0
other 0 C 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
Total 270
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
10
0
160
300 4 D 0 0 0
E 0 0 0
R 0 0 0
other 15 C 4 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
Total 19
Pico Ave
Ellis Ave
1.03 (mi)
Resurf 20', 0.25' RMS
to San Jacinto Ave
20 (ft)/ 20 (ft)
Pigeon Pass Rd
Moreno Valley C.L.
0.70 (mi)
Resurf,0.25' AC
to 0.7 mile North M.V.C.L
18 (ft)/ 18 (ft)
Pilot Dr
Galley Dr
0.03 (mi)
Reconstruct Surface
to N'ly Galley Dr 0.03 mi
33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Pilot Dr
Windlass Dr
0.20 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to E'ly 0.20 mi
33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
300 106 D 2 0 0
E 1 0 0
R 0 0 0
other 0 C 103 0 0
Total 106
300 Measure A/Western
300 111 D 0 0 2
E 0 0 1
R 0 0 0
other 0 C 0 0 108
Total
111
300 Measure A/Western
301 11 D 0 0 2
E 0 0 1
R 0 0 0
other 0 C 0 0 8
Total 11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
301 35 D 0 0 0
E 0 0 0
R 0 0 0
other 0 C 0 0 0
Total
35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
32
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
.000069
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 30
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Pinehurst Rd
Bradley Rd to Piping Rock Rd
0.47 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Plumrose St
Cornell St to E'ly 0.19 mi
0.19 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.15' AC and 0.12' AHRM
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
67
67
44
0
44
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
D
E.
R
C
6
1
0
60
o 0 o
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
38
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Port Cir
Barnacle Dr to Wly 0.1 mi
0.10 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 30' RMS
301
other
Total
Port Royal Ave
Hermitage Dr
0.38 (mi)
Reconstruct Surface
to Cambridge Ave
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Port Royal Ave
Cambridge Ave
0.22 (mi)
Recon AC surface
to Jamaica Sands Dr
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Primrose Ln
Viola St to E'ly 0.05 mi
0.05 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.15' AC and 0.12' AHRM
Ramon Rd
W'ly of Arbol Real Ave
0.05 (mi)
Const drainage dry wells
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
12
0
12
80
0
80
53
0
53
18
0
18
49
0
49
0
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
10
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
74
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
47
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
12
0
D
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
4
42
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
{_�00070
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 31
DEC 7, 1999
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Rancho California Rd
Butterfield Stage, Rd
4.21 (mi)
Const Left Turn Lane
to Glen Oaks Rd
32 (ft)/ 44 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
398
1056
1454
Rancho California Rd
De Luz Rd to Temecula C.L.
3.39 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft)
Grind and Resurf 0.17' AC
300
other
Total
Reche Canyon Rd
Arroyo Dr to N'ly 1 mile
0.60 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
realign and widen road
HES award deadline 6/30/97.
Construct only from 2000' N'ly of Arroyo Dr to
5200' N'ly
300
other
Total
Reche Canyon Rd
Arroyo Dr
0.40 (mi)
Realign road
to N'ly 0.4 mi
26 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
Record Rd
Potter Rd
0.75 (mi)
Grind and Resurf
to SH 79
13 (ft)/ 13 (ft)
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Redlands Blvd
San Timoteo Canyon Rd to Moreno Valley C.L.
2.36 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Grind and Resurf
Regatta Dr
Spinnaker Wy to Hallyard Dr
0.13 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Resurface Paved Road
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
568
0
568
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 1 00/01 01/02 102/03 03/04
D 120
0
0
0
0
E 30
0
0
0
0
R 2
0
' 0
0
0
C 3
243
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
55
1
0
0
0
0
0
512
0
0
0
0
15
0
15
268
396
664
80
0
80
285
250
535
21
0
21
4
0
1
10
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
66
39
14
2
3
0
0
144
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
71
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
1
0
259
2
1
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
��00071
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 32
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Ridgemoor Rd
Valley Blvd
1.00 (mi)
Recon AC road surface
to Sun City Blvd
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
River Rd Bridge
Santa Ana River
0,12 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Bridge Replacement
RCTD Br.# S8002, State Br#. 56C 017
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 103/04
123
100
223
1463
11060
12523
Riverview Dr
Limonite Ave to Ave Juan Diaz
1.87 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 28 (ft)
Reconstruct surface and Widen
Roberts Rd
Wood Rd to Wily 1.26 mi
1.26 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft)
Resurf RMS paved road
Investigate widening to 26'.
Roble Dr
Encino Rd
0.18 (mi)
Resurf AC Paved Rd
to S'ly End
21 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Rocky Point Dr
Club View Dr to Ebb Dr
0.36 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS
Rocky Way
Double Tree Dr Wly
0.10 (mi)
Resurf 26',0.17'AC
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other.
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
►�a(}72
1208
0
1208
146
0
146
34
0
34
47
0
47
14
0
14
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
123
0
0
0
D
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
15
0
0
0
31
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
34
15
11
0
39
0
11
0
6
0
0
1301
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
300 Measure A/Western
95
5
0
3
0
0
0
735
0
0
0
370
D
E
R
C
2
1
0
143
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
1
0
26
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 2
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 44
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
11
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 33
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Rouse Rd
Bottlebrush Rd
0.40 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Bradley Rd
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Royal Cir
Jackie Dr to E'ly 0.07 mi
0.07 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
87
0
87
23
0
23
Rustic Ln
Pacific Ave
0.42 (mi)
Recon AC paved road
to Wily End
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
300
other
Total
277
0
277
Rutile St
Van Buren Blvd
0.25 (mi)
Reconst AC surface
to Bellegrave Ave
35 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Sage Rd
Sly 1 mi Cactus Valley to Sly 2 mi Cactus Valley
1.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Widen, Recon 26' RMS road
Stockpile vertical excess 1 mi Sly
Recon 0.42 mi. Flatten 3 vert. 8 2 horiz. curves
Sage Rd
Sty 2 mi Cactus Valley to Sly 3 mi Cactus Valley
1.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Widen, Recon 26' RMS Road
Use A7-0318 excess for fill.
Recon 0.33 mi. Raise 2 low areas.
Sage Rd
Sly 3 mi Cactus Valley to Sly 4 mi Cactus Valley
1.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Widen, Recon 26' RMS Road
Recon 0.17 mi. Resurface remainder.
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
3
12
15
240
• 283
523
437
76
513
290
0
290
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 103/04
15
1
0
71
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
17
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
39
1
0
2
0
0
0
235
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
240
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
0
0
0
0
E 0
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 437
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
5
20
0
0
0
0
0
265
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IT00073
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 34
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
Sage Rd
Nly .35 mi Red Mtn Rd to Sly .65 mi Red Mtn Rd
1.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Widen, Recon 26' RMS Road
300
other
Total
Sage Rd
Sly .65 mi Red Mtn Rd to Sly 1.65 mi Red Mtn Rd
1.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Widen, Recon 26' RMS Road
Recon 0.4 mi. Resurface remainder.
Sage Rd
Sly 1.65 mi Red Mtn Rd to East Benton Rd
0.60 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Widen, Resurf 26' RMS Road
Sail Cir
Lighthouse Rd
0.04 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
300
other
Total
265
265
286
0
286
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 03/04
5
10
0
0
0
0
0
250
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
10
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
246
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
other
Total
155
0
155
10
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
130
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
to Ely Lighthouse 0.04 mi
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
San Jacinto Rd
Fern Valley Rd
0.38 (mi)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
to Glen Rd
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
San Jacinto St and Hemet Street
Stetson Ave to N'ly to Hemet C.L.
1.00 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft)
Resurf AC paved roads
Partial width in the City of Hemet.
Coop With City of Hemet app'd 6/29/99.
San Timoteo Cyn Rd
Redlands Blvd
1.20 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
50% in SDN3
to S.B. County Line
24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
100074
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
9
0
9
38
0
38
194
0
194
375
140
515
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
2
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
2
1
0
35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
194
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
375
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 35
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Sandra Dr
Jackson St
0.11 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Wily end
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
301
other
Total
Santa Rosa Mine Rd
Christmas Tree Ln to•E'ly 0.36 mi
0.36 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Realign RMS Paved Road
50% in SD #1 and 50% in SD #5.
Santa Rosa Mine Rd
Lake Matthews/Gavilan to Ply
2.50 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Establish project scope for improvements
Santa Rosa Rd
Post Rd
0.98 (mi)
Recon RMS paved road
to 'Ply
24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Saturn Way
Malibar Ave to Ply 0.05 mi
0.05 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Scenic Dr
Daryll Dr to Wayne Dr
0.30 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurf 24',0.17'AC
Coordinate with waterline work
Scott Rd
I-215 to Winchester Rd (SH 79N)
5.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Reconstruct AC paved road
and investigate widening to 4 lanes.
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
29 D 4
E 1
R 0
0 C 24
29
129
0
129
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
129
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
533
0
533
170
0
170
19
0
19
0
E
R
C
10
14
0
1
30
6
0
422
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
R
C
10
10
0
150
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
5
1
0
13
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
30 D 0
E 0
R 0
0 C 0
30
180
1050
1230
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
2
0
0
28
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 175
E 5
R 0
C 0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f)00075
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 36
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Scott Rd
Murrieta Rd
2.00 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to I-215
28 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Sea Gull Dr
Via Costa Brova to Flamingo Dr
0.57 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 24' RMS
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
Seahorse Way
Barnacle Dr
0.12 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Port Cir
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
301
other
Total
Sedco Blvd
Mission Tr
0.22 (mi)
Resurf 49', 0.25' RMS
to E'ly 0.22 mi
49 (ft)/ 49 (ft)
300
other
Total
Seeley Ave
Arrowhead Blvd
1.00 (mi)
Resurf 26', 0.26'RMS
to Neighours Blvd (Rte78)
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Sequoia In
Cornell St
0.25 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Dartmouth St
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
302
other
Total
300
other
Total
Shell Dr
Leeward Dr
0.37 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Rocky Point Dr
18 (ft)/ 18 (ft)
301
other
Total
000076
Fund
Source
Amount
x $1000
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
= Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
= Environmental C = Construction
99/00 ( 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
191
681
872
49
0
49
19
0
19
75
0
75
108
0
108
61
0
61
41
0
41
25
5
0
0
15
3
0
i43
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
46
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
16
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
72
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
0
0
3
0
E 0
0
0
2
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
0
103
0
302 Measure A/Palo Verde
D 0
0
0
0
6
E 0
0
0
0
1
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
0
0
54
300 Measure A/Western
2
1
0
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 37
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Shoal Dr
Beacon Dr to Rocky Point Dr
0.22 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Resurface 0.21', 33' RMS
Silver Fir Dr
Cedar Glen Dr Wly
0.20 (mi)
Resurf 26',0.17'AC
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Simpson Rd
Briggs Rd to Rte 79
3.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Reconst AC Paved Rd
Investigate groundwater problem near ponds.
Fund
Source
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x $1000
28
0
28
24
0
24
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 102/03 103/04
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
25
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
21
0
0
0
0
South Broadway
15th Ave to Blythe CL
0.40 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft)
Resurface 0.1', 38' A/C W/ petromat
Spalding Dr
Cambridge Ave
0.25 (mi)
Resurface 0.21', 35' AC
to Hopewell Ave
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Spar Cir
Galley Dr
0.04 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to NWIy Galley Dr 0.07 mi
30 (ft)/ 30 (ft)
St. Lucia Ct
Port Royal Ave to Nly Port Royal 0.03 mi
0.03 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Reconstruct Surface
300
other
Total
302
other
Total
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
1205
0
1205
85
0
85
55
0
55
13
0
13
15
0
15
D
E
R
C
110
5
0
0
0
0
0
545
0
0
0
545
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
302 Measure A/Palo Verde
0
0
0
0
8
2
0
75
5
1
0
49
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
0
2
0
0
E 0
0
1
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
10
0
0
361 Measure A/Coachella Valley
3
1
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
000077
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 38
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
Stephenson Blvd
SH 78
1.02 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to 30th Ave
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Stetson Ave
Santa Fe St
0.97 (mi)
Resurface 40', 0.21' AC
to Windsor Ct
40 (ft)/ 40 (ft)
Sun City Blvd
Cherry Hills Blvd to Valley Blvd
0.42 (mi) 62 (ft)/ 62 (ft)
Resurface AC paved road
Misc. funds are from ENO waterline work.
302
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
93
0
93
12
397
409
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x $1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 03/04
1
1
0
91
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
302 Measure A/Palo Verde
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
other
Total
Sun City Blvd
McCall Blvd
0.50 (mi)
Resurf AC paved road
to Chambers Ave
48 (ft)/ 48 (ft)
Sun City Median Improvements
0.00 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Place Stamped Concrete
including concrete in Newport Rd parkway on
north side east of Evans Rd.
Sun City Median Improvements
0.00 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Place Stamped Concrete
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
4
297
301
232
0
232
50
5
55
50
0
50
Sun City Median Improvements
0.00 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Place Stamped Concrete
300
other
Total
50
0
50
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
1
0
209
7
1
0
42
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
7
0
0
0
E 0
1
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
42
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
7
1
0
42
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
onnn78
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 39
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Sun City Median Improvements
0.00 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Place Stamped Concrete
Sunfish Ln
Barnacle Dr
0.11 (mi)
Reconstruct Surface
to Shell Dr
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Swingle Ave
Miles Ave
0.20 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to N'ly Miles Ave 0.2 mi
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Sycamore Rd
Atlantic Ave
0.31 (mi)
Resurf RMS paved road
to Nancy Dr
33 (ft)/ 33 (ft)
Sylvester Rd
Mission Tr
0.21 (mi)
Resurf 26',0.17'AC
to Lakeview Terrace
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Thousand Palms Canyon Rd
Ramon Rd to Dillon Rd
5.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Widen and Resurf RMS paved road
Tobago Ct
Port Royal Ave
0.03 (mi)
Reconstruct Surface
to Nly Port Royal 0.03 mi
32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
301
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
50
0
50
19
0
19
36
0
36
49
0
49
25
0
25
771
0
771
15
0
15
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04
D 0 0
E 0 0
R 0 0
C 0 0
'300 Measure
A/Western
0
0
0
0
7
1
0
42
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
2
1
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
33
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
D
E
R
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
46
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
2
1
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
5
0
0
0
E 0
2
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
382
382
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
3
1
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
:100079'
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 40
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Tokay Rd
Crescent Ave
0.20 (mi)
Resurf 20', 0.25' RMS
to Mesa Dr
20 (ft)/ 20 (ft)
Trenton Way
Fordham Dr to Jamestown Dr
0.05 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Trinity Cir
Port Royal Ave
0.20 (mi)
Recon AC surface
to NW'ly end
35 (ft)/ 35 (ft)
Turner St
Grand Ave SWIy
0.29 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Recon 261,0.21'RMS on 1.01DG
University Dr
Academy Dr to Collegian Wy
0.04 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM
Van Buren Blvd (Northside)
West of Regency Ranch to W'ly 0.5 mi
0.50 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
Const concrete V ditch
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Van Buren St
52th Ave to 55th Ave
1.51 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurface west half of road
SB 300 Cycle 9.
City of Coachella can not participate on east
half of road.
►ng0g0
301
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
40
40
15
0
15
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 ( 01/02 02/03 03/04
2
1
0
37
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
9
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
54
0
54
103
0
103
16
0
16
124
0
124
138
0
138
5
1
0
48
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
100
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 5
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 10
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
30
1
0
93
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
138
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 41
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Varner Rd
1.9 mi S. Chase School to Berkey Dr
1.55 (m1) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Resurface AC paved road
Vassar St
Fulton Ave to•N'ly 0.05 mi
0.05 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with ARM
Via Costa Brava
Vanderveer Rd
0.57 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Seaview Wy
24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Vineland St
Edgar Canyon Channel
0.01 (mi)
Construct box culvert
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Viola St
Plumrose St to Whittier St
0.09 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Remove pavement, Resurf 0.15' AC and 0.12' AHRM
Warmington St
Hwy 78 to E'ly 0.24 mi
0.24 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Resurf and widen AC paved road
Washington St
Thousand Palms Cyn Rd to S'ly Pushawalla 0.90mi
2.53 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Grind and Resurf
Fund
Source
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
302
other
Total
301
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
74
250
324
13
0
13
60
0
60
403
0
403
26
0
26
55
0
55
486
0
486
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 1 01/02 02/03 1 03/04
15
4
0
0
8
1
0
46
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5
1
0
7
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
57
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
52
20
0
0
0
0
0
331
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
20
300 Measure
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
55
302 Measure
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
A/Palo Verde
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
47
1
0
438
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 42
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Washington St Bridge
French Valley Stream
0.01 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
:Realign and replace existing bridge
Wellman Rd
Terwilliger Rd to Kirby St
1.00 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 ('ft)
Widen North side,0.51DG; Resurf 26',0.21'RMS
Wentworth Dr
Bradley Rd to SE'ly 0.37 mi
0.37 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Westover Way
New Bedford Rd to S'ly New Bedford .11mi
0.11 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Windsor Dr
Cherry Hills Blvd to McCall Blvd
0.39 (mi) 41 (ft)/ 41 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
Windward Dr
70th Ave
0.25 (mi)
Resurface Paved Road
to Bounty Ave
74 (ft)/ 74 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
301
other
Total
Winged Foot Dr
Cherry Hills Blvd
0.38 (mi)
Resurf with AHRM
to McCall Blvd
37 (ft)/ 37 (ft)
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
19
54
73
103
0
103
58
0
58
21
0
21
68
0
68
91
0
91
44
0
44
) 0 0 0 8 2
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 00/01 101/02 02/03 03/04
0
0
0
19
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
100
0
0
0
0
5 0
1 0
0 0
52 0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
15
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
0
61
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 2
0
0
0
0
E 1
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 88
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
5
1
0
38
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 43
DEC 7, 1999
Name
Limits
Length (mi)
Description
(comments)
EW (ft)/PW (ft)
Wood Rd
Markham St
1.50 (mi)
Resurf
to Cajalco Rd
26 (ft)/ 26 (ft)
Fund
Source
Total
300
other
Total
Worsley Rd
20th Ave to Dillion Rd
0.70 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft)
Reconstruct surface with RMS on existing base
Yorba Linda Ct
Bradley Rd to Ply Bradley 0.16 mi
0.16 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft)
Grind and Resurf with AHRM
301
other
Total
300
other
Total
* Future Projects
District 1 Only
0.00 (mi)
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
These funds will be used for pavement
rehabilitation projects in the years shown.
* Future Projects
District 2 Only
0.00 (mi)
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
These funds will be used for pavement
rehabilitation projects in the years shown.
* Future Projects
District 5 Only
0.00 (mi)
0 (ft)/ 0 (ft)
These funds will be used for various pavement
rehabilitation projects in the years shown.
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
300
other
Total
Fund
Source
Amount
x S1000
252
252
73
0
73
Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year
Amount x S1000
D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition
E = Environmental C = Construction
99/00 1 00/01 1 01/02 1 02/03 03/04
1
1
0
250
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
70
27
0
27
170
483
653
250
500
750
5
1
0
21
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D 0
0
0
0
170
E 0
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
D 0
0
0
0
0
E 0
0
0
0
0
R 0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
0
0
250
300 Measure A/Western
230
374
604
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300 Measure A/Western
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
230
0
0
0
0
1)00083
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM
FISCAL YEARS 2000-2004
Fund Source Summary
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Page 44
DEC 7, 1999
Fund Fund Source
Source Name
300 Measure A/Western
301 Measure A/Coachella Valley
302 Measure A/Palo Verde
* Grand Totals *
Fiscal Year (Amt x S1000) Fund Source
Total Expenditure
99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 (Amt x S1000)
14016 5801 4643 6601 7378 38439
2016 991 861 1655 1139 6662
286 93 103 283 220 985
16318 6885 5607 8539 8737 46086
)00084
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
February 9, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Budget and Implementation Committee
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Planning and Programming
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
SB 821 Program Extension Requests from the City of Banning and
County of Riverside
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve the requests from the City of Banning and County of
Riverside for an extension of time to March 30, 2000 to complete their SB821
Projects.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
City of Banning
The City of Banning was allocated $10,431 for the Nicolet Street Sidewalk project
under the FY 1998-99 SB 821 Program. Due to staff turnover, work on moving the
project forward was delayed. The City requested and received an initial project
extension to December 31, 1999 and are now requesting a subsequent extension to
March 30, 2000. The project has gone out to bid and the bid openings are scheduled
for January 19, 2000. Award of the contract could occur within 30 days of this date.
Given the progress exhibited to award a contract, staff concurs with the request for
an extension.
County of Riverside
The County of Riverside was allocated $29,500 in FY 1998-99 SB 821 Bicycle and
Pedestrian Facilities Program funds for the construction of 22 access ramps in the Sun
City area. These funds were originally expected to be awarded by June 30, 1999,
however only one bid was received on this project which was found to be excessively
high. The Commission approved a time extension to September 30, 1999 to allow
time for a rebid of this project.
The County has informed us that a new bidding process was completed and a contract
was awarded by the September 30`h deadline. However, subsequent to the award, it
was learned that the contractor was in the process of filing bankruptcy and will no
longer be in the construction business. The next lowest bidder declined to accept the
contract offer.
r)00085''
The County is in the process of re -advertising the project as part of a larger road work
project to expedite the bidding and award process and avoid a small individual
contract. The County is requesting a time extension to March 30, 2000 for the award
of a construction contract for this project.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$30,931
Source of Funds
SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Program
(Y/N)
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
Y
Year
Included in Program Budget
Y
Year Programmed
99
Approved Allocation
Y
Year of Allocation
99
Budget Adjustment Required
N
Financial Impact Not Applicable
��0086
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
February 9, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Budget and Implementation Committee
Jerry Rivera, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Agreement with Department of California
Operation of the Freeway Call Box System
Highway Patrol for
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission: 1) approve an agreement, subject to legal counsel review, with
the State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol, for the operation of
the call box system; and 2) authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement on behalf
of the Commission.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (RC SAFE) and the
State of California, Department of Highway Patrol (CHP), previously entered into
agreements to reimburse the California Highway Patrol for all costs associated with the
implementation and operation of the call box system. The CHP is required by
legislation to answer all call box calls and provide central dispatching services for SAFE
call box motorist aid systems in areas of CHP jurisdiction and within Caltrans right of
way.
The agreement requires the Riverside County SAFE to pay for:
• CHP costs for plan review;
• A share of the cost for the planning, designing, and implementing a computer
aided dispatch (CAD) system as well as the cost to purchase the equipment;
• All dispatch personnel costs associated with the call box system;
• A proportionate share of the SAFE Coordinator position and any related
equipment;
• Indirect costs applied to the personnel costs;
000087
" C a l l b o x r e l a t e d c h a r g e s b i l l e d t o t h e C H P b y a T r a n s l a t i o n S e r v i c e C o n t r a c t o r
t h a t a r e d i r e c t l y a t t r i b u t a b l e t o t h e c a l l b o x s y s t e m ;
" A l l f u r n i t u r e a t t r i b u t a b l e t o p e r s o n n e l h a n d l i n g S A F E c a l l b o x c a l l s , a n d
" A s h a r e o f t e l e p h o n e s y s t e m c o s t s t h a t i n c l u d e A u t o m a t i c C a l l D i s t r i b u t o r ( A C D )
a n d T e l e p h o n e M a n a g e m e n t I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m f e a t u r e s .
T h e a t t a c h e d a g r e e m e n t i s f o r a o n e ( 1 ) y e a r p e r i o d f r o m J u l y 1 , 1 9 9 9 t h r o u g h J u n e
3 0 , 2 0 0 0 , w i t h a n o p t i o n t o e x t e n d t h e a g r e e m e n t f o r o n e ( 1 ) a d d i t i o n a l y e a r t h r o u g h
J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 1 . T h e t o t a l a m o u n t o f t h e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l n o t e x c e e d $ 1 2 7 , 7 3 4
a n n u a l l y .
F i n a n c i a l A s s e s s m e n t
P r o j e c t C o s t
$ 1 2 7 , 7 3 4
S o u r c e o f F u n d s
S A F E F e e s
( Y / N )
I n c l u d e d i n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t
Y
Y e a r
I n c l u d e d i n P r o g r a m B u d g e t
Y
Y e a r P r o g r a m m e d
9 9 - 0 0
A p p r o v e d A l l o c a t i o n
Y e a r o f A l l o c a t i o n
B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t R e q u i r e d
N
F i n a n c i a l I m p a c t N o t A p p l i c a b l e
1 0 0 0 8 8
CHP CONTRACT 10002-99 / 00
1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2 DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
3 AND
4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES
5
6
7 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 1st day of July, 1999, by and
$ between the State of Califomia acting by and through the Department of Califomia
9 Highway Patrol, hereinafter called CHP, and the Riverside County Service Authority for
10 Freeway Emergencies, hereinafter called SAFE, under provisions of the Califomia
11 Vehicle Code Sections 2421.5 and 9250.10, and the Streets and Highway Code
12 Section 131.1 and Chapter 14 (commencing with Section 2550) to Division 3.
13
14
15
16 TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
17
18 By and in consideration of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the SAFE
19 and the CHP do hereby agree as follows:
20
21
22 1 This Agreement is for services and assistance provided by the CHP in
23 accordance with the "CHP/Caltrans Call Box and Motorist Aid Guidelines," as
24 they may be revised from time to time, attached hereto as "Exhibit An and
5 incorporated herein by this reference. Hereinafter the "CHP/Caltrans Call Box
z6 and Motorist Aid Guidelines," shall be referred to as the "CHP/Caltrans
27 Guidelines."
28
29
30 2. This Agreement shall remain in force from July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000,
31 unless SAFE executes the option to extend the Agreement for one (1) additional
32 year in which case the Agreement shall terminate on June 30, 2001 subject to
33 the following:
34
35 a) That it shall not become effective until (1) the SAFE has submitted to CHP
36 a copy of the resolution, order, motion, or ordinance from the SAFE
37 approving execution of this Agreement and identifying the individual
38 authorized to sign on behalf of the SAFE, and (2) that this Agreement is
39 duly signed by both parties.
40
41 b) This Agreement may be extended for a period of one (1) year provided
42 SAFE notifies CHP in writing, no later than January 31, 2000. If so
43 notified, this Agreement will be in effect through June 30, 2001, and the
44 total amount shall not exceed $127,734 annually.
45
RVside96. Doc
6/10/99
1
000089
46 c) That it may be modified only in writing and signed by both parties, and
47 shall be modified by the parties to conform to any future changes to
48 federal or state law which affect the terms of this Agreement.
49
50 d) Because of the time and expense early termination would entail to both
51 parties, either party may terminate this agreement before the expiration of
52 its term, or any extension, only upon six (6) months prior written notice to
53 the other party.
54
55 e) Notwithstanding subparagraph 2. c above, CHP may terminate this
56 agreement upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the SAFE should
57 the SAFE be financially unable to reimburse CHP for services under this
58 agreement.
59
60
61 3. For services and assistance herein, the SAFE agrees to reimburse CHP
62 quarterly, in arrears and upon receipt of an itemized invoice, for the charges
63 identified in Section 12. Upon receipt, payment shall be made to CHP as
64 invoiced within sixty (60) days. If payment is not submitted because of a
65 dispute, SAFE agrees to submit the reasons for the dispute to CHP within sixty
66 (60) days of receiving the invoice charges.
67
68 a) Payment shall be made to:
69
70 Department of Califomia Highway Patrol
71 Accounting Section
72 PO Box 942898
73 Sacramento, CA 94298-0001
74
75 b) Invoices shall be sent to:
76
77 Riverside County SAFE
78 c/o Riverside County Transportation Commission
79 3560 University Ave., Suite 100
80 Riverside, CA 92501
81
82
83 4. The maintenance of the call box system (outside of the CHP communications
84 center), including telephone service and line costs, shall be the sole
85 responsibility of the SAFE.
86
87
88 5. SAFE shall reimburse CHP for all personnel costs associated with the number of
89 operator_positions CHP and SAFE agree are required to handle call box call
90 traffic. CHP will only increase or decrease the number of operators after
RVside96. Doe
8/10/99
2
i00090
91 receiving a written request/commitment from the SAFE stating that the SAFE will
92 assume all personnel costs for the additional positions.
93
94
95 After Initial Implementation
96
97 Ninety (90) days prior to the beginning of each subsequent fiscal year, CHP will
98 re-evaluate communications center call box operator staffing requirements. The
99 most recent twelve months (annual average) of call box call activity (when
100 available) will be used with the CHP Reimbursable Position. Formula (defined in
101 the Guidelines) to determine the currently required staffing level. The CHP will
102 submit to the SAFE a letter, with applicable substantiating data, indicating any
103 necessary changes in staffing. The SAFE will then respond to CHP within thirty
104 (30) days, in writing, indicating concurrence or disagreement with the
105 recommendation.
106
107 SAFE shall advise CHP of any anticipated significant new installations that
108 should be considered into the annual staffing analysis. This notification should
109 be made to CHP at least thirty (30) days prior to the annual staffing analysis.
110
111 The SAFE may request, or CHP may perform, if the need arises, staffing
112 analysis at other times of the year. If a change in staffing is required due to a
113 non -predicted need, the CHP and/or SAFE may request, in writing, such a
114 change. Staffing changes may be necessary for, but need not be limited to, the
' 5 following: increases/decreases in the number of call boxes, or significant
16 increases/decreases in the number of call box calls.
117
118
119 6. SAFE shall pay for its proportional share of the actual wage rate for a single
120 CHP SAFE Coordinator position, and SAFE's proportional share of computer
121 equipment costs (including software), when applicable, for a single CHP SAFE
122 Coordinator. The SAFE Coordinator position, as well as the reimbursable
123 computer equipment (including software), will be used exclusively for SAFE-
124 related business.
125
126 Each SAFE's proportional share billing "factor" will be determined at the
127 beginning of each fiscal year by comparing the number of motor vehicles
128 registered within each SAFE's boundaries to the total number of motor vehicles
129 registered in all counties who have entered into SAFE agreements with the CHP.
130 This proportional share will be billed over four fiscal quarters. CHP will include
131 an estimation of the SAFE Coordinator's personnel and computer equipment
132 costs in the annual staffing estimation.
133
134
135 7. Call box calls will be handled by CHP communications centers as third level
136 priority - after 911 (first priority) and allied agency (second priority) calls. The
RVside96. Doc
8/10/99
3
000091
137 CHP statewide standard level of service for the handling of call box calls is as
138 follows:
139
140 a) Call box calls will be handled as rapidly as possible, however they should
141 be handled ideally no longer than 60 seconds after the first ring at the
142 communications center. Experience has shown that when emergency
143 communications traffic becomes unusually heavy, call box traffic also
144 increases. At these times, motorists may be required to wait several
145 minutes for service.
146
147
148 b) Call box calls should be handled ideally within a 3.5 minute (210 seconds)
149 total call handling time. It is understood that the use of such services, as
150 the Translation Service Contractor, will increase total call handling time to
151 levels above this standard.
152
153
154 8. CHP will provide to the SAFE, on a monthly basis, the following summary reports
155 from the Telephone Management Information System (TMIS) at the CHP
156 communications center handling SAFE's call box calls:
157
158 i) System Status Report
159 ii) Delayed Call Spectrum Report
160 iii) Lost Call Spectrum Report
161 iv) Trunk Detail Report
162
163 If the communications center servicing the SAFE does not have a TMIS, or
164 should the SAFE Coordinator's TMIS equipment (including Software) failure
165 occurs, these reports may not be available.
166
167
168 9. CHP shall be responsible for the procurement, installation, and maintenance of
169 all communications center equipment related to the call box/motorist aid system.
170 All systems procured for the CHP dispatch operation will be designed by CHP.
171 No equipment will be installed in a CHP facility which does not meet all CHP
172 operational and technical specifications.
173
174 All communications center equipment purchased under this agreement shall
175 become solely the property•of CHP.
176
177
178 10. If CHP ceases to provide freeway call box dispatching services, CHP shall pay
179 to the SAFE that proportion of the fair market value of all equipment purchased
180 for the CHP in whole or part with SAFE funding. The current fair market value
181 shall be determined by Telecommunications Division, Department of General
182 Services, at the time of cessation of service.
RVside96. Dec
W10/99
)00092
4
183
184
185 11. CHP shall review SAFE's plans and specifications for upgrading or modifying the
86 SAFE's call box system, and provide written comments within sixty (60) days of
187 submittal by the SAFE. If the sixty (60) day time frame cannot be met, the CHP
188 shall notify the SAFE, by prior writing, specifying the reasons why and indicating
189 the additional time required. It is understood that all upgrades or modifications
190 to SAFE's system will be in accordance with the joint CHP/Caltrans Guidelines.
191
192
193 12. CHP agrees to submit an itemized invoice quarterly to the SAFE which may
194 include the following charges:
195
196 ONGOING:
197
198 a) Personnel costs (salary and benefits) determined under the terms of this
199 agreement. Operator personnel costs will be based on the third step of
200 the wage scale for Communications Operators in effect at the time of
201 invoicing. SAFE Coordinator personnel costs will be based on the actual
202 step of the wage scale for the SAFE Coordinator position at the time of
203 invoicing. These costs are subject to change according to increases
204 and/or decreases in State of Califomia salary and benefit rates, which are
205 beyond CHP control.
206
�7 b) Indirect Costs will be applied to the monthly personnel costs in
-J8 accordance with California State Administrative Manual Section 8752 and
209 8752.1. The indirect cost rate is determined by the CHP and approved by
210 the Califomia Department of Finance (DOF) and is subject to change
211 each State fiscal year. The re-evaluation of staffing requirements (as
212 outlined under Section 5) will include an explanation of the projected
213 upcoming fiscal year indirect cost rate.
214
215 c) Computer equipment costs (including software), when applicable,
216 associated with the CHP SAFE Coordinator position.
217
218 d) Translation service charges directly attributable to call box calls and billed
219 to CHP by a Translation Service Contractor, will be reimbursed by SAFE.
220 CHP will maintain a contract with a translation service to provide
221 necessary interpretation/translation services for call box -related calls.
222 CHP will bill SAFE, in arrears, quarterly for charges billed by the
223 translation service contractor. All SAFE invoices will be accompanied by
224 copies of billings from the translation services contractor.
225
226 e) The telephone system costs (if applicable), that include Automatic Call
227 Distributor (ACD) and Telephone Management Information System
228 (TMIS) features as inherent and inseparable parts of the system. Such as
RVside96. Doc
8/10/99
5
)00093
229 the SR1000, will be billed at a variable percentage rate for monthly
230 recurring maintenance and support costs, and SAFE's proportional share
231 of a fixed rate of thirty percent (30%) for one time installation costs. The
232 variable percentage rate will be determined annually by considering the
233 number of incoming/outgoing call box calls as a percentage of total
234 dispatch center call traffic. Prior year ACD data will be used for this
235 calculation. The re-evaluation of staffing requirements (as outlined under
236 Section 5) will include an explanation of the projected upcoming fiscal
237 year telephone billing percentage rate.
238
239 ONE TIME CHARGES:
240
241 f) Purchase and installation costs of all fumiture attributable to the handling
242 of SAFE call box calls. Furniture costs charged to the SAFE will be based
243 on the proportion of call box calls in relation to all telephone calls.
244
245 g) SAFE's proportional share of thirty-three percent (33%) of the costs for
246 the planning, design, and implementation of the statewide computer -aided
247 dispatch (CAD) system, including the cost of a consultant contracted by
248 CHP to perform those tasks.
249
250 h) SAFE's proportional share of Thirty-three percent (33%) of the cost of all
251 equipment purchased for the computer -aided dispatch system. This will
252 include both hardware and software purchase for the CHP
253 communications center where SAFE's call box calls are handled.
254
255 Each quarterly invoice shall include a thorough explanation and justification for
256 any new additional charges or changes of the amounts of past charges.
257
258 The total amount of this Agreement shall not exceed $127,734.00 annually, for a
259 total contract amount of $255,468.00
260
261
262 13. Neither the CHP or any officer, agent, or employee shall be responsible for any
263 damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done
264 by the SAFE under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction
265 delegated to the SAFE under this agreement. Pursuant to Government Code •
266 Section 895.4, the SAFE shall fully indemnify and hold CHP harmless form any
267 liability imposed for injury (as defined by Govemment code Section 810.8)
268 occurring by reason of anything done by the SAFE under or in connection with
269 any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to the SAFE under this agreement
270 and for which the SAFE would otherwise be liable.
271
272 Neither the SAFE nor any officer, agent, or employee shall be responsible for
273 any damage, or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be
274 done by CHP or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated
RVside96. Doc
AM94
6
275 to the CHP under this agreement. Pursuant to Govemment Code Section 895.4,
276 CHP shall fully indemnify and hold the SAFE harmless from any liability imposed
277 for injury (as defined in Govemment Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of
78 anything done or omitted to be done by CHP under or in connection with any
279 work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to CHP under this agreement and for
280 which the CHP would otherwise be liable.
281
282
283 14. Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, any dispute concerning a
284 question of fact arising under this agreement which is not disposed of by mutual
285 agreement of the parties may be submitted to an independent arbitrator mutually
286 agreed upon by the CHP and SAFE. The arbitrator's decisions shall be non-
287 binding and advisory only, and nothing herein shall preclude either party, at any
288 time, from pursuing any other legally available course of.action, including the
289 filing of a law suit. Pending a final decision of a dispute hereunder, both parties
290 shall proceed diligently with the performance of their duties under this
291 agreement, and such continued performance shall not constitute a waiver of any
292 rights, legal or equitable, of either party relating to the dispute.
293
294
295 15. All services under this agreement shall be coordinated by:
296
297 Department of the California Highway Patrol
298 Telecommunications Sections
�g 860 Stillwater Road
J0 West Sacramento, CA 95605
301 (916) 375-2901
302
303 The contact person shall be the CHP SAFE Coordinator.
304
305
306 16. This agreement, and any attachments or documents incorporated herein by
307 inclusion or reference, constitutes the complete and entire agreement between
308 the CHP and SAFE and supersedes any prior representations, understandings,
309 communications, commitments, agreements or proposals, oral or written.
310
311
312 17. Under no circumstances will SAFE or its subcontractor(s) use the name
313 "California Highway Patrol" or "CHP" to promote a product which is part of the
314 call box system without the written consent of the CHP.
RVside96. Doc
6/10/99
7
+00095
315
316 STATE OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE
317 DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY
318 HIGHWAY PATROL EMERGENCIES
319
320
321
322
323
324 Administrative Services Officer Signature
325
326
327 Title
328
329
330 Date Date
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339 Date
Counsel, Riverside SAFE
RVside96, Doc
8/10/99
000096
8
EXHIBIT A
CHP/CALTRANS
CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID
GUIDELINES
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of California Highway Patrol
Telecommunications Section
Department of Transportation
Traffic Operations Program
Draft
January 1999
00009'7
CHP/C ALTRA NS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
TABLE QE CONTENTS
Eaz:
I. INTRODUCTION 1
A. Background 1
B. Legislative History 1
C. Statewide Systems Standards . 2
II POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 2
A_State Agencies, General 2
B.California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) 2
C.Califomia Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 3
D.California Highway Patrol (CHP) 4
E.Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) 5
III. COMMUNICATIONS 6
A.Dispatch Service 6
6
B.The Call Box and Motorist Aid System
7
C.CHP Communications Center
8
D.System Management
IV. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 8
A.Call Box Site Requirements * 8
B.Call Box Hardware System Support Requirements 8
C.Call Box Spacing 9
D.Call Box Removal and Relocation 10
V. CALL BOX MOTORIST AID SYSTEM REVIEW 10
VI. BELLING AND REIMBURSEMENTS 11
VII .CONTRACT AGREEMENTS 12
VI:MOTHER MOTORIST AID SYSTEM APPLICATIONS 12
A. Other Applications 12
B. Responsibilities 34
Annex A
Annex B
Annex C
Annex D
Annex E•
Annex F
Annex Gs
Annex H
Annex I
ANNEXFS
California Streets and Highways Code Section 01.1. Sections 2250 -2559. and California Vehicle
Code 9250.10
California Streets and Highway Codc. Sections 250-257. The California Freeway and Expressway
System
Call Box Sign Specifications
Call Box Numbering System
Disabled Access Survey Formats and Procedures
Sample Letters to Request Communications Operators
Typical Call Box Site Development Details. including Disabled Access Requirements
CHP Information
Example of SAFE Program Implementation Plan
* Not available as of 11/1/95
000098
CHPICALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
I. INTRODUCTION
A. BACKGROUND
In 1985 the California Legislature passed Senate
Bill 1199 to enable counties to generate revenue
for the purpose of purchasing, installing, operat-
ing and maintaining an emergency motorist aid
system. This legislation, enacted January 1, 1986,
required that the California Department of Motor
Vehicles (DMV) collect revenue, the Department
of the California Highway Patrol (UP) and the
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
provide review, approval, and operating services.
These guidelines have been written to facilitate the
coordination with county governments and agen-
cies that choose to provide call box and motorist
aid services to their constituencies.
B. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
1. Senate Bill 1199. Enacted January 1,1986.
Provided the basic format for the forma-
tion of Service Authorities for Freeway
Emergencies (SAFES). Outlined -govern-
mental responsibilities, revenue
generating policies, and prescribed loca-
tions for call box placement. Included
emergency mechanical service patrols and
other motorist assistance programs.
2. Senate Bill 1597. Enacted January 1, 1987.
Amended SB 1199 by deleting emergency
mechanical service patrols and changed the
legislation to be directed solely and entirely
to call boxes.
3. Assembly Bill 3660. Enacted January. 1,
1987. Amended SB 1199 to permit the
placement of call boxes on state highway
routes which connect segments of the Cali-
fornia Freeway and Expressway System
and are under CHP jurisdiction.
4. Senate Bill 202. Enacted January 1, 1987.
Permitted county transportation commis-
sions to serve as SAFES. Determined how
generated revenue was to be obligated, in-
cludine revenue bonds.
5. Senate Bill 592. Enacted January 1, 1988.
Permitted the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC) to serve as the SAFE
for all nine Bay Area Counties if the coun-
ties elected to be included
6. Senate Bill 2182. Enacted September 22,
1988. Removed all references to call box
systems as "emergency" and declared it a
misdemeanor to damage or destroy a call
box. Stated that no reimbursement to lo-
cal governments by the State would be
required by call box legislation. Authorized
reimbursement of expenses for members
of a SAFE board.
7. Assembly Bill 2937. Enacted January 1,
1991. Provided for the installation of call
boxes on state highways and county ex-
pressways using SAFE funds.
8. Senate Bill 1254. Enacted October 5, 1991.
Allowed for the establishment of a SAFE
by the Sacramento Area Council of Gov-
ernments (SACOG) to function as a SAFE
for anyor all of the counties of Sacramento,
Yolo, Yuba, Sutter, and San Joaquin.
9. Assembly Bill 1390. Enacted October 7,
1991. Authorized a County and its cities
to designate a Council of Governments to
Serve as a SAFE for the County.
10.Senate Bill 565. Enacted October 8, 1991.
Allowed for use of SAFE funds, which are
in excess of the amount needed for the
1
000099
CHP/CALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
motorist aid system of call boxes, to be used
for additional motorist aid services or sup-
Port-
11.Assembly Bill 1077. Enacted January 1,
1993. Requires that SAFE motorist aid
systems meet standards of Title II the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
C . STATEWIDE SYSTEMS STANDARDS
The above legislative history provides a
clear picture of legislative intent that Cali-
fornia SAFE motorist aid systems should
be developed on a county by county basis
at no cost to the State. However, there must
be overall planning to provide standardiza-
tion and compatibility on a statewide basis.
Motorists who travel from one SAFE ju-
risdiction to another must be able to receive
a minimum standard level of service. Con-
sequently, each motorist aid project must
be designed to be integrated as part of the
statewide roadway system. To achieve that
integration, it is necessary that the follow-
ing standards be met:
1. Call boxes must be easily identifiable to
the motoring public. This will require that.
all call boxes be a uniform color and be
signed identically. The signs must be the
same shape, color, and design so that mo-
torists will be able to find assistance easily,
regardless of where they reside or travel in
California. Refer to Annex C for materials
specifications.
2. Every call box must have a unique num-
ber to simplify identification for service
providers, automated dispatch systems, law
enforcement officers, and the motoring
public. The numbering system approved
by the CHP and Caltrans is explained in
Annex D.
►��J0100
2
3. In order to provide reasonable access to the
greatest number of motorists, the highest
operable part of the call box shall not be
higher than 1.4 m and the handset cord
must be at least 736 min long.
4. Any other motorist aid systems to be in-
stalled pursuant to Streets and Highways
Code §2557(d) shall meet or exceed all
specifications and/or guidelines established
by the CHP and/or Caltrans.
II. POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES
A. STATE AGENCIES, GENERAL
1. The joint responsibility of the CHP and
Caltrans shall be to assist each SAFE in
developing, installing, operating, and main-
taining a motorist aid system of call boxes.
2. Caltrans Districts and CHP Divisions will
assist the SAFE with planning and design
specifications for call box motorist aid
projects.
3. Foul approval by Caltrans will be executed
by the Deputy Director, Maintenance and
Operations. Final approval by the CHP will
be executed by the Office of the Comrnis-
sioner. .
B. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
MOTOR VEHICLES (DMV)
DMV will:
1. Commence the collection of the S1.00 fee
per registration after the authorizing agency
has submitted to the DMV Director the fol-
lowing:
CHPICALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
a. A written request that DMV begin fee
collection.
b. A copy of the resolution and minutes
establishing the SAFE.
2. Contact the authorized SAFE representa-
tive by telephone and:
a. Provide the DMV liaison name and
telephone number.
b. Explain implementation procedures.
c. Provide implementation date.
d. Follow up with confirmation letter from the
DMV Director.
3. Collect additional vehicle registration fees
and distribute them to the SAFE after de-
duction of administrative costs.
C . CALIF'ORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (Caltrans)
Caltrans will:
1. Provide specifications for call box spacing,
placement, and site development plans.
2. Provide district representatives to partici-
pate in reviews or consultations requested
by the SAFE.
3. Provide specifications for the size, shape,
color, location on post, and design of call
box signs.
4. Review call box system plans installation
or replacement instructions, crash test data
and reports with primary consideration for
safety.
5. Issue permits to the SAFE for the construc-
tion and maintenance of a call box system
pursuant to Section V, paragraphs E and F
of these guidelines.
6. Notify a SAFE of call box installations that
will be blocked by a barrier rail or that will
be removed due to roadway construction.
Thirty days prior notice will be provided
by Caimans. If a temporary barrier rail is
to be placed in front of a call box, the SAFE
shall decide whether to remove the box or
bag it during construction.
7. Inspect installations, replacements and up-
grades to assure compliance with the terms
of the permits.
8. Provide ex officio representation on the
California SAFE Committee.
9. Review and approve plans for any other
motorist aid system being proposed pursu-
ant to Streets and Highways Code $2557(d)
that affect the highway system or MP op-
erations with primary consideration for
safety . •
10. Review call box knockdowns reported by
the SAFE(S) to either validate design and
safety criteria or establish a basis for rede-
• sign of call box installations.
11. Negotiate a cooperative agreement with
each SAFE individually to comply with
reimbursement procedures: See Section VI.
3 000101
CHP/GLTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
D. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
(CHP)
The CHP will:
1. Provide field and Telecommunications Sec-
tion representation on SAFE technical
advisory committees.
2. Provide review of final call box motorist
• aid technical and operational specifications
as they relate to CHP communications cen-
ters.
3. Coordinate the review and final approval
of proposed motorist aid system technical
elements with the engineering staff of the
rnlifornia Department of General Services,
Telecommunications Division. Their ongo-
ing review will ensure that no county
freeway motorist aid system will in any
way interfere with existing telecommuni-
cations systems or prevent anticipated
enhancements to those systems.
4. Answer all call box motorist aid telephone
calls and provide central dispatching ser-
vices for SAFE call box . motorist aid
systems in areas of CHP jurisdiction and
within Caimans right of way.
5. Provide communication center staffing to
handle dispatching services and when re-
quested, will agree to provide standard
monthly reports that will determine if lev-
els of service have been met. (See Annex
H for staffing fotmulas.)
6. Make building modifications needed to
accommodate additional equipment for call
box motorist aid services when necessary.
7. Maintain, in cooperation with Caimans, the
statewide numbering system for the
unique identification of all individual call
boxes.
8. Respond to call box vandalism/lrnocicdown
reports and alarms and notify the SAFE or
its representative, as appropriate. The CHP
will provide to the SAFE, if possible, the
citation of motorist and a record of the iden-
tity and mailing address of the responsible
party so that the SAFE can bill the motor-
ist for remuneration of damage incurred;
and will notify SAFE of knockdown or
vandalism incidents.
9. Provide to the SAFE, when possible, pho-
tographs of vehicle causing knockdown
showing where the vehicle collided with
the call box.
10.Negotiate a contract with each SAFE indi-
vidually for the handling of call box calls.
11.Provide ex officio representation on the
California SAFE Committee.
12. Develop, in conjunction with the SAFES,
a set of Policies and Procedures encom-
passing all aspects of the handling of
freeway call box calls. These procedures
include that portion of the CHP communi-
cations center Standard Operating
Procedure (SOP), and will strive for con-
sistency in all counties. CHP will
coordinate with each SAFE to develop the
local Policy and Procedure package as soon
as the motorist aid system has been selected
and the system design has been completed.
These Policies and Procedures may be re-
vised upon mutual agreement of CHP and
SAFE as the need arises.
13. Review any motorist aid system being
proposed pursuant to Streets and Highways
Code §2557(d).
-400102
4
CHP/CALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
E. SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR
FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (SAFE)
SAFE will:
1. Schedule an initial meeting immediately
after the formation of the SAFE with rep-
resentatives from the CHP and Caltrans to
discuss the program and the CHP/Caltrans
Guidelines.
2. Form a Technical Advisory Committee to
include representation from Caimans and
CHP to provide consultation and review of
proposals based on the interests and con-
cerns of the County and State agencies and
the Americans with Disabilities Act, if ap-
propriate for public safety. This Committee
shall provide ongoing consultation and re-
view throughout the development and
implementation of the project. The SAFE
will schedule the first Technical Advisory
Committee meeting as needed, following
the formation of the.SAFE.
3. Initiate the imposition of an additional ve-
hicle registration fee on vehicles registered
within their respective jurisdiction through
DMV.
4. Develop plans and specifications for site
locations, recommended call box spacing
and equipment for their call box system
within the general guidelines.
5. Propose the standards of service and reli-
ability that it intends to achieve with its call
box motorist aid system, and use those stan-
dards as the basis of its system plan.
6. Consult with the CHP and Caltrans durine
the development of project plans to assure
that the proposed call box motorist aid sys-
tem operational and safety performance is
5
compatible with existing and planned CHP
operating standards and Caimans Safety
Standards..
?. Reimburse the CHP for all costs incurred
as a direct result of establishing a call box
motorist aid system pursuant the terms in
Section VI of these guidelines..
8. Reimburse Caltrans for costs incurred for
necessary call box motorist aid system
safety review, permits and other related
services pursuant the terrors in Section VI
of these guidelines.
9. Be responsible for the operation of the call
box motorist aid system equipment.
10.Be responsible for maintaining the call
boxes in good working order. The SAFE
or the S AFE's maintenance connector will
be required to possess and understand
Caltrans-approved detailed written instal-
lation and replacement instructions of the
approved motorist aid system, and provide
a performance bond to ensure that work to
repair inoperable instruments or systems
shall be initiated within two working days.
The two day period shall begin when the
contractor is notified of'a malfunction.
11. Be responsible for arranging for testing of
call box designs incorporating new or
changed features that may affect crashwor-
thiness or motorist safety as determined by
alums or CHP. The SAFE shall submit
the plans (including detailed drawings
showing weights, locations and model
numbers of all components), installation or
replacement instructions and test results to
the CHP and Caimans for review and ap-
proval of any desired new or modified
products prior to.frnal approval or installa-
tion.
000103
CLIP/GUTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
12.Be responsible for testing new technical
design (See Section IV.B.l.a-b.) or opera-
tional features offered by competitive call
box vendors, proposed to be implemented
by the SAFE, which affect motorist and/or
dispatch use or management applications.
SAFE shall submit the plans (including
detailed drawings showing weights, loca-
tions and model numbers of all
components), installation or replacement
instructions and test results to the CHP and
Caltrans for review and approval of any
desired new products prior to final approval
or installation.
13.Provide detailed installation instructions,
plans and specifications to Caltrans at least
one month prior to conducting any qualifi-
cation crash tests. After crash testing has
been completed, SAFE shall submit test
results, photos, and movie films of the crash
tests for review and approval by Caltrans.
14.Maintain a record, by location number, of
all units struck by any vehicle. The data
collected should contain, as available, pho-
tographs and accident reports submitted to
SAFE by CHP as outlined in section II.D.9
of these guidelines regarding damage to call
box system components, the vehicle and
injuries incurred, if any.
15. Submit an annual report to Caltrans regard-
ing the call boxes struck by vehicles, and
photographs and accident reports submit-
ted to SAFE by CHP as outlined in section
ILD.9.
16. Notify Caltrans' District Office of Permits
when 'an installation has been completed
so Caimans may inspect and approve the
work per the permit allowing the work.
17. Conduct apublic information prosram to
ensure that motorists understand what the
call boxes are and how and what the call
boxes are to be used for.
)00104
6
III. COMMUNICATIONS
A. CHP DISPATCH SERVICE
1. Call box traffic will be handled by CHP .
dispatch centers as third level priority, af-
ter 911 and allied agency calls.
2. The CHP standard for level of service of
freeway call box call handling is as follows:
a. Call Box calls should be handled i$eally
no longer than 60 seconds after the first
ring. (See Annex H). Experience has
shown that when emergency communica-
tions traffic becomes unusually heavy, call
box traffic also increases, and motorists
may have to wait extended lengths of time
for service. SAFES must recognize that this
should be expected.
b. In situations where a "dedicated" call box
operator setup is established, the SAFE
may contract with CHP for a different level
of service than defined in (a) above. Any
change in level of service shall be funded
by the requesting SAFE and shall be de-
fined in a written agreement with the
requesting SAFE.
3. The CHP will annually or monthly as
agreed to by the CHP and the SAFE, pro-
vide descriptive statistical information to
describe call box telephone activity and
level of service.
B. THE CALL BOX MOTORIST AID
SYSTEM
1. New call box motorist aid systems shall be
designed with full duplex voice communi-
cations between the motorist and the
dispatcher. This has been recommended
CHP/GILTRANS CALL. BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
primarily because it permits the motorist
to receive the precise type of assistance
required at the earliest possible time. It also
enables the motorist to request special types
of tow service and arrange for payment
prior to service being dispatched Follow-
ing are mandatory standards that apply to
a full duplex system:
a. Normal telephone handset operation.
b. Audio level at the handset (motorist) and
through the system (dispatcher) sufficient
to overcome heavy traffic (ambient) noise.
c. A signal or message to inform the motorist
of the status of the call, i.e., all circuits busy.
d. Simple functionality to complete connec-
tion after accessing the call box. There shall
be no requirement for complex multiple
operations such as push -to -talk transmit
e. Simple written instructions using universally
understood symbols where possible.
f. Multilingual written instructions where
deemed appropriate by the SAFE.
g. Sufficient lighting such as backlighting to
illuminate operating instructions.
h. A time phase disconnect feature to elimi-
nate excessive line costs or system
congestion.
C. CHP COMMUNICATIONS
CENTER
1. Additional equipment, including working
positions and automated systems to accom-
modate call box telephone traffic, will be
integrated to serve the functions of all dis-
patch traffic, and will not solely serve the
needs of a call box motorist aid system. Call
box Motorist aid systems must interface
with this equipment.
2. Equipment installed at CHP communica-
tions centers to accommodate the call box
motorist aid system will meet CHP stan-
dards; and be common to all center
equipment and/or telecommunications sys-
tems.
3. When requested by and also funded by the
SAFE or otherwise, CHP will consider
adding the following equipment to com-
munications centers that will:
a. Automatically log all telephone and radio
traffic and compile statistics to assist in
center management, computation of costs,
and system management
b. Automatically distribute all telephone traf-
fic, by priority, to the first available
dispatcher.
c. Automatically transmit a tone announce-
ment to the call box callers informing them
of the procedures that will be followed in
handling their call.
d Provide taped message when a call is
queued, instructing caller that dispatch has
been reached and to hold for the fast avail-
able operator.
e. Provide automatic number identification of
the call box by number and location, and
display pertinent ready reference informa-
tion concerning service providers, such as
hospitals, fire deparanent, etc., within the
jurisdiction of that call box.
4. Call box motorist aid telephone calls will
not be screened by communications opera-
tors in CHP dispatch centers unless the
SAFE agrees to pay all personnel and
equipment costs for that service.
000105
GHP/GILTRANS C. LL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
5. Initially, the CHP will hire the number of
personnel needed to handle anticipated call
box calls at the agreed upon level of ser-
vice. These positions will only be
authorized by the Legislature after the steps
required by Section 28 of the 1988 Budget
Act are met. SAFES are required to submit
a letter requesting a specific number of
positions to handle call box calls. The
SAFE must specify that it will reimburse
CHP for all personnel costs associated with
those positions. A Section 28 normally
takes 60 to 90 days to provide CHP with
the authorized positions requested. Refer
to Annex F for a sample letter.
6. Once the motorist aid system is fully
implemented, the CHP will reevaluate the
number of personnel needed to handle
actual call box calls at the applicable level
of service. Recommendations for
additional personnel or personnel
reductions will be related to the SAFE in
writing.
7. All additional CHP communications per-
sonnel hired to accommodate call box
motorist aid calls will perform all normal
duties of dispatch employees, and will not
function exclusively to respond to call box
motorist aid calls unless agreed to by the
CHP and the SAFES. •
D. SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
1. System diagnostic messages will be trans-
mitted directly to maintenance or system
management locations of the SAFE's
choosing. With the sole exception of the
alarms discussed below, CHP will not as- .
sume responsibility for any maintenance
messages or information.
2. Alarms that may signify vandalism or a
knockdown may register in the appropriate
=)00106
8
CHP communications center. This type of
alarm will alert the dispatch center in order
to facilitate a timely response by CHP.
3: No aspect of the call box equipment or
system shall interfere with or prevent
planned future enhancements of the State/
CHP telecommunication systems.
4. Equipment added to or replaced in CHP
communications centers by CHP will in-
terface with and not inhibit or interfere with
the operation of established call box mo-
torist aid systems. Unanticipated problems
will be corrected as rapidly as resources
permit
IV. DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION
A. CALL BOX SITE REQUIREMENTS
1. Within spacing requirements, call box lo-
cations will be selected to have minimal
impact on normal highway operation. A call
box will not be located wherethere is less
than an eight foot shoulder or closer than 2
feet from the edge of a traffic lane where a
raised curb or guard rail is present; any
exceptions will be handled on a case by
case basis.
2. Locations for call box installations shall
conform to and be placed according to the
typical call box site plans for given condi-
tions unless prior authorization for a
different site plan has been permitted by
the local district office. Refer to Annex G.
GHP/CALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
B. CALL BOX HARDWARE SYSTEM
SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS
1. Call boxes located on poles or posts in ar-
eas exposed to traffic will be mounted on a
breakaway support, the design of which has
been approved by Caltrans. Where a pro-
posed breakaway support design has not
been previously crash tested and approved,
the SAFE is responsible for having the nec-
essary full-scale crash tests performed with
automobiles, and obtaining Caimans ap-
proval prior to installation.
a. New or modified designs, equipment, in-
stallation methods, or changes in
component weight or location shall be
crash tested using an automobile by an in-
dependent contractor in accordance with
NCHR.P Report 230.
b. At least 30 days prior to crash testing, di-
mensioned plans clearly showing
orientation, weight, finish of components,
specifications of equipment, and detailed
installation instructions shall be submitted
for review and approval.
c. Caltrans shall be notified two weeks prior
to conducting crash test, and may witness
installation and testing.
d. The independent contractor conducting the
crash tests shall submit a formal written
report containing all data, information and
results necessary to make an evaluation
following the crash tests for Caltrans to
review and approve .
2. Call boxes may be mounted on existing
Caimans structures where the call box will
not interfere with the function of the struc-
ture. Tlie installation of call boxes on
existing Caltrans structures with yielding
or breakaway supports will not be permit-
ted.
3. No unauthorized markings shall be placed
on the call box, call box sign post or pole.
4. The standard call box sign shown on
Caimans Sign Specification Sheet SG-25
is the only approved sign and must be used
- Signs should be an appropriate size for the
community or environment and should be
easily readable by the motorist Special
signs are designed to be used in the coastal
zone, on scenic highways, in state parks or
in communities which request special
signage. For routes on the California sys-
tem of officially designated scenic
highways, to k=p signing compatible with
scenic values, SAFE may specify special
signs. The SAFE coordinator will notify
the District Scenic Highway Coordinator
of proposals involving special signs on sce-
nic highways.
5. The call box shall be painted or finished
with the shade of yellow conforming to
specifications established by Caimans.
C. CALL BOX SPACING
1. Within the guidelines, call box spacing
should ensure motorist safety by provid-
ing the closest feasible spacing to reduce
both pedestrian: and vehicle exposure time.
Closer spacing also contributes to conges-
tion relief by providing faster notification
and clearing of disabled vehicles from the
roadway.
2. Variation in te.: _in, available revenue, and
urban/rural characteristics are factors in the
decision of spacing between call boxes. In
order to allow f.exibility and still maintain
consistency i- these installations, the
county SAFE':shall adhere to the follow-
ing spacing rec_irements:
9
��00107
CHP/CA TRANS GALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GLIIDELINES
ADT
SPACING
Lower than 40,000
1.6 km or more
40,000 to 100.000
800m
to
1.6 km
Higher than 100.000
400m
to
800m,
*A reasonable spacing on rural highways with
low ADTs may be a random spacing based
on geometric and economic needs. Random
spacing does not constitute a system of call
boxes but rather a service. These call boxes
should only be placed in an area where
adequate safe clearance from the roadway
is avaiiable.-
•
a CALL BOX REMOVAL AND
RELOCATION
•
1. Caltrans will notify the SAFE at least 30
days in advance of the performance of any
work that will require the temporary or
permanent removal, removal from service
(bagging), or relocation of any call boxes.
2. Caltrans will notify the SAFE at least 30
days in advance of the completion of any
work that required the temporary removal,
removal from service (bagging), or reloca-
tion of call boxes.
3. All temporary or permanent removal or
relocation of call boxes will be performed
by the SAFE or its designated contractors.
4. Caltrans will instruct its engineers and con-
tractors to include adequate turnouts for call
box placement, where possible, when
restriping, freeway widening or other work
will result in the permanent elimination of
adequate shoulder width in areas with ex-
isting call boxes.
=300108
10
V. CALL BOX MOTORIST
AID SYSTEM REVIEW
A. The SAFE will submit the following docu-
mentation to the CHP and Caltrans for State
review:
1. A copy of the resolution that establishes
the SAFE.
2. Proposed operational specifications of the
system.
3. Proposed technical specifications and sys-
tem architecture.
4. Proposed system description, i.e. number
of call boxes required for complete
implementation, locations, call box site
development plans, spacing, etc. (See
Annex I)
5. A five year implementation plan that in-
cludes the initial installation of call boxes
encompassing anticipated expansion from
implementation to five years in the future.
This shall include the location, and num-
ber of call boxes to be installed each fiscal
year.
B. The SAFE should allow up to 60 days for
state review of and response to the initial
system design request for proposal (RFP),
and 60 days for any subsequent RFP re-
view, if the State will require greater than
60 days, the State will notify the SAFE, in
writing, of the amount of time that will be
required for review, as well as explain the
reason for the delay.
C. Caltrans and CHP will attempt to respond
in a timely fashion to all requests to review
proposals. Early notice of planned systems
CHP/CAL RAMS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
will help to ensure timely introduction of
resource needs and authorizations into the
State budget process thus minimizing de-
lay in the installation and/or operation of a
new system.
D. The assumption of SAFE call box call re-
sponsibilities may require additional
building space at some CHP communica-
tions centers. Further, there may be
circumstances where such space limitations
could temporarily prevent the CHP from
supporting a county motorist aid call box
system. In such a case it may be necessary
to make major alterations or to construct a
completely new dispatch facility. Gener-
ally, such major capital projects require
three years to complete from initial bud-
geting through the completion of
construction.
E. Caimans will issue an encroachment per-
mit for design, construction and installation
work within the freeway right-of-way when
the CHP and Caltrans have completed the
review and have approved final plans, de-
tailed proposed installation and
replacement instructions, and specifica-
tions for the motorist aid call box system.
Additionally, Caltrans must be assured that
the work will be contracted with proper
safety precautions and that the proper li-
ability insurance has been obtained prior
to design, construction and installation
work.
F. An encroachment permit will also be
required for the SAFE or SAFE'S
contractor for maintenance, ongoing design
or service work within State right-of-way.
Caltrans will issue this permit upon
assurance that all equipment and
installation procedures to be used in
conjunction with ongoing design and
service or maintenance work is equipped
with proper safety' devices, personnel
involved are fully instructed on safety
precautions to be observed, and the proper
liability insurance has been obtained.
VI. BILLING AND
REIMBURSEMENTS
11
A. Caimans shall be reimbursed by the SAFE
for costs incurred in providing services and
assistance in the planning, safety review,
review of preliminary system plans and
installation instructions, implementation of
call box and other motorist aid systems
funded by a SAFE. SAFEs may, at their
sole discretion and cost, conduct annual
financial, compliance, and/or performance
audits of all Caltrans work and charges re-
lated to agreements between she SAFES and
Caltrans. Caltrans will charge a SAFE for
review, approval, and permit services only
after such services have been provided.
B. CHP shall be reimbursed by the SAFE for
all costs incurred for services and assistance
provided in the planning, implementation,
and/or dispatch operation cif call box mo-
torist aid systems. This will include costs
for CHP staffing (SAFE Coordinator posi-
tion, Communications 'Operators, and
Communications Supervisors), equipment
and facilities, as well as those personnel
costs incurred by the Deparanent of Gen-
eral Services, Telecommunications
Division, during the engineering review.
SAFES may, at their sole discretion and
cost, conduct annual financial. compliance,
and/or performance audits of all CHP work
and charges related to aueements between
the SAFES and the CHP.
C. CHP will bill SAFEs quarterly for the costs
outlined in Section B above.
000109
CHP1C.ALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
VII. CONTRACT
AGREEMENTS
A. SAFE's will enter into individual agree-
ment with both Caltrans and the CHP. Said
agreements will contain complete state-
ments of responsibilities and negotiated
positions of the agreeing parties.
B. Some of the terms and conditions to be es-
tablished in the CHP/SAFE agreement are
as follows:
1. Effective time period of the agreement
2. Review and renewal procedures.
3. Default consequences.
4. Outline of, and basis for reimbursement
charges.
S. Invoicing and payment procedures.
6. CHP standard levels of service.
C. A cooperative agreement developed jointly
by Caltrans and each SAFE is the imple-
menting document for Caltrans. Terms and
conditions for development of a call box
motorist aid system are established in the
Caltrans-SAFE cooperative agreement.
VIII. OTHER MOTORIST
AID SYSTEM
APPLICATIONS
A. OTHER APPLICATIONS
The following describes other applications and
locations of a call box system and other. safety
related motorist aid systems.
12
1. CONVENTIONAL HIGHWAY APPLI-
CATIONS
A call box motorist aid system shall be es-
tablished on portions of the California
Freeway and Expressway system, a county
expressway system and on state highway
routes that connect segments of these sys-
tems. These routes will be located within
the county in which the authority is estab-
lished and over which the Department of
California Highway Patrol or an agency
designated by the CHP has law enforce-
ment responsibility.
Through cuaent and future reviews of the
existing freeway and expressway system,
SAFES shall work with the CHP and
Cakrans in the development of motorist
aid system of call boxes on existing and
newly constructed portions of the Califor-
nia Freeway and Expressway System,
county expressway systems, and on all state
highway routes.
2. TOLL ROAD GUIDELINES
Motorist safety is the primary concert of
the CHP and Caimans, whether on free-
ways, expressways, state highways, toll
bridges or on toll roads. Motorist aid call
boxes play an integral role in helping
stranded motorists by providing a vital
communication link with CHP dispatch
centers. SAFES can expand their call box
system on toll roads in cooperation with
the toll road authority.
Neither public and private toll road
authorities nor SAFES are required to install
roadside call boxes nor pay for the costs of
call box design, approval, installation,
maintenance and repair, since that is not
currently required of Caimans or of the
county departments of transportation or
public works when a public road is
CHP/CALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
constructed. The SAFE will negotiate with
the toll road authority the responsibility for
all aspects of acquisition, installation,
operation and maintenance of a motorist
aid call box system. A cooperative
agreement between the SAFE and the toll
road authority may be necrccary to outline
their respective responsibilities.
3. SAFETY RELATED MOTORIST AID
• SYSTEMS
Streets and Highways Code §2557(d) al-
lows for the use of excess funds received
under the original legislation to be used for
other motorist aid projects. The money used
must exceed the. amount needed for full
implementation and ongoing administra-
tive costs to maintain and operate the
motorist aid. system of call boxes. This
money may be used for safety related
projects on portions of the California Free-
way and Expressway System and a county
expressway system and on state highway
routes that connect segments of these sys-
tems. Freeways and expressways shall be
defined as those listed in the most recent
Streets and Highways Code §250-257 (See
Annex B).
This money may be used for additional
motorist aid services or support including,
but not limited to, safety related projects
such as:
• Changeable message signs (CMS)
• Lighting for call boxes.
• Support for traffic operations centers
• Contracting for the removal of disabled
vehicles from the traveled ponion of the
right-of-way (Freeway Service Patrol)
13
4. NEW TECHNOLOGY AND ITS
APPLICATIONS
New call box technology plays an integral
role in Intelligent Transportation Systems
(ITS). The current generation of call boxes,
typified by the California Service Author-
ity For Freeway Emergencies (SAFE)
program, are expandable, programmable
units. These "smart" boxes, with minor
infrastructure changes, can become poten-
tial data links to other traffic -related
monitoring, communication and control
functions that can potentially interface with
Transportation Management Centers.
SAFES are encouraged to consider expand-
ing the scope of their call box infrastructure
by integrating the following future tech-
nologies and applications:
• Traffic Census
• Real time or near -real time traffic counts
and speeds for use in incident notification.
• Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) surveil-
lance systems using miniature camera
technology.
• Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) and
Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI).
• Traveler Information Systems using infra-
red, microwave or standard low -power
radio frequency links.
• Hazardous weather condition detection and
reporting, e.g. fog and dust storm alerts.
• Weigh -in -Motion Facilities.
• Hazardous materials (HAZMAT) tracking.
• Public transit, freight and fleet management
applications.
CHP/CALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
• Cellular satellite, personal communications
service (PCS) and other advanced commu-
nications backbone systems.
• Pollution monitoring.
B. RESPONSIBELMES
The following responsibilities applies to the call
box and motorist aid systems discussed in
Section VIII, A.
1. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
(DMV) WILL:
a. Have no additional responsibilities.
2. THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
(CHP) WIL
a. Review for approval, any proposed call box
system or special project on any public or
private toll road submitted by a SAFE that
directly affect CHP operations.
b. Review for approval, any implementation
plan submitted by a SAFE regarding in-
stallation of call boxes on public or private
toll roads.
c. Coordinate specifications and development
guidelines for any ITS -related call box ap-
plications that impact CHP
communications center or other field op-
erations.
d. Assist SAFES in planning and development
of operational concepts and subsequent
operational concepts and subsequent opera-
tional tests of ITS -related call box
applications.
ti 0112 14
3. THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS)
W1rL:
a. Review for approval, any proposed call box
system or special project on any public or
private toll road submitted by a SAFE.
b. Work with regional or local SAFES in de-
termining location of motorist aid system
of call boxes on newly constructed high-
ways.
c. Review for approval, any implementation
plan submitted by a SAFE regarding in-
stallation of call boxes on public or private
toll roads.
d. Review Cooperative Agreements between
SAFES and toll authorities to assure that
they are consistent with contracts between
Caltrans and the toll authorities.
e. Provide specifications for any motorist aid
system.
f. Coordinate specifications and development
guidelines for peripheral equipment that
can potentially integrate with call box in-
stallations for ITS -related call box
applications.
g-
Insure that call box communications with
the Traffic Operations Center are designed
according to approved standards for exist-
ing and planned TOC equipment.
h. Assist S AFEs in planning and development
of operational concepts and subsequent
operational tests of ITS -related call box
applications.
CHP/CALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
4. COUNTY SAFE WILL -
a. Submit any proposed call box system or
special project on any public or private toll
road along with project operation and
maintenance cost estimates to CHP and
Caimans for review and approval.
b. Not implement any proposed special
project until reviewed and approved by
CHP and Caimans.
c. Enter into cooperative agreements with
private or public toll road authorities for
funding, placement, operation and mainte-
nance of call boxes and other motorist aid
systems on the roadway and submit to CHP
and Caimans for review and approval.
d. If planning any ITS applications, define and
plan for the integration of ITS- related tech-
nologies into the call box infrastructure and
will coordinate with Caltrans and CHP
operational concepts and design opera-
tional tests to determine cost and technical
feasibility of proposed concepts. Will for
any costs incurred during the review and
approval process.
e. Reimburse CHP and Caltrans for any costs
incurred during the review and approval
process or negotiate payment to CHP and
Caimans for ITS applications.
5. PUBLIC OR PRIVATE TOLL ROAD
AUTHORITIES WILL
a. Coordinate with local SAFE regarding call
box location and Implementation Plan.
b. Enter into cooperative agreements with
SAFES for funding, placement, operation
and maintenance of call boxes and other
motorist aid systems on the roadway
15
)00113
CHP/CALTRANS
CALL BOX AND
MOTORIST AID
GUIDELINES
ANNEXES
A. Call Box Statutes
B. California Freeway and Expressway System
C. Call .Box Sign Specifications
D. Call Box Numbering System
E. Disabled Access Guidelines
F. Sample Request Letters to CHP
G. Typical CaII Box Site Development Details X
H. CHP information
I. Example of SAFE Pro=ram Implementation Plan
* (hot included in this printing, subject to Federal ruling.)
HIP
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
000114
ILINN -A A
�rar/t.At.J AA/V� OVA a/ a*1.4 4.4.4:�:
Streets and Highway Code
§ 131.1. Motorist call boxes; contract for installation, operation, and
maintenance; reimbursement for costs.
Upon the request osf any service authority for freeway emergencies that has
imposed additional fees on vehicles pursuant to Section 9250.10 of the Vehicle Code,
the department may contract with the authority for the installation, operation, and
maintenance of motorist call boxes on portions of the California Freeway and Express-
way System within the county. The service authority shall reimburse the department
for all costs incurred under this section
(Added by Stats.1985, c.1350, § 1. Amended by Stats.1988, c. I132, § 1, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
Vehicle Code
§ 9250.10. Service authority for freeway emergencies; additional fees; distribution
after deduction of administrative costs
(a) In addition to any other fees specified in this code and the Revenue and
Taxation code, any additional fees imposed by a service authority for freeway emer-
gencies pursuant to Section 2555 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be paid to
the department at the time of registration or renewal of registration of every vehicle
subject to registration under this code in the subject counties, except those vehicles
that are expressly exempted under this code from the payment of registration fees.
(b) After deducting'its administrative costs, the department shall distribute.
the additional fees collected pursuant to subdivision (a) to the authority in the county
in which they were collected.
(Amended by Stats.1988, c.1132, § 13, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
(Added by Stats.1985, c.11350, § 4.)
Library References
Automobiles 49,101. C.J.S. Motor Vehicles § 143 et seq.
A-1
addin
ANNEX A
CHP/C.AL7RANs CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES •
Streets and Highway Code
Chapter 14
SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES
Section
2550. Legislative intent
2550.1. Renumbered.
2551. Establishment of authority in counties; designation of county transportation commission as
authority; metropolitan transportation commission as authority.
25515. Compensation of members, expenses. •
2552. Metropolitan transportation commission as authority for two or more counties; funding.
2553. Membership.
2554. Duty of authority.
2555. Fees on registered vehicles of county.
2556. Merger of existing authority into authority established by metropolitan transportation com-
mission.
2557. Use of moneys received on emergency motorist aid system; review and approval of plans
for implementation of system proposed; construction and maintenance or lease or lease -
purchase of facilities.
2558. Revenue bonds; issuance; pledge of revenues; use of proceeds on call boxes; priority of
liens.
2559. Removal, damage, or interference with call box; violation; repair costs.
Chapter I4 was added by Stats.I985, c. I350, § 2.
§ 2550. Legislative Intent
The Legislature declares that its intent in enacting this chapter is to encourage
the placement of call boxes along 'the California Freeway and Expressway System to
enable motorists in need of aid to obtain assistance. However, it is not intended that a
motorist aid system of call boxes be considered an emergency telephone system.
(Added by Stats.1988, c. I132, § 3, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
Historical and Statutory Notes
Former § 2550 was renumbered § 2551 and amended by Stats.1988, c.1132, § 2.
Cross References
.
Highway patrol to answer calls and provide dispatching services for authority, see Vehicle Code
§ 24215.
§ 2550.1. Renumbered § 2552 and amended by Stats.1988, c.1132, § 4
,)n 116
A -2
ANNEX A
CHP/CALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
Streets and Highway Code
§ 2551. Establishment of authority in counties; designation; "authority" and "service
authority" defined
(a) A service authority for freeway emergencies may be established in any county if the
board of supervisors of the county and the city councils of a majority of the cities within
the county having a majority of the population of cities within the county adopt resolu-
tions providing for the establishment of the authority.
(b) The resolutions may designate the county transportation commission for the county,
created pursuant to Division 12 (commencing with Section 130000) of the Public Utili-
ties Code or council of governments formed pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with
Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, as. the service authority
for freeway emergencies. The powers of a co**+mission or council of governments so
designated are limited to those of the service authority.
(c) The Metropolitan Transportation Commission may function as the service authority
for freeway emergencies in any or all of the Counties of Santa Clara, San Mateo, Alameda,
Contra Costa, Marin, Solano, Sonoma, Napa, and the City and County of San Francisco
upon adoption of a resolution by the Commission to act as a service authority and upon
ratification of the commission's resolution in a particular county by the board of super-
visors of the city and county or by the board of supervisors of the county and by the
city councils of the cities within the county having a majority of the population of the
cities within the county.
(d) The Sacramento Area Council of Governments may function as the service author-
ity for freeway emergencies in any or all of the Counties of Sacramento, Yolo, Yuba,
Sutter, and San Joaquin upon adoption of a resolution by the council to act as a service
authority and upon ratification of the resolution in a particular county by the board of
supervisors of the county and by the city counciLs of the cities within the county having
a majority of the population of the cities of the county.
(e) As used in this chapter, "authority" and "service authority" mean a service author-
ity for freeway emergencies created pursuant to this chapter.
(Amended by Stats.1991, c. 549 (S.8.I254), § 1, eff. Oct. 7,1991; Stats.1991, c. 711 (A.8.1390), § 15.)
(Formerly § 2550, added by Stats.1985, c.1350, § 2. Amended by Stats.1986, c. 997, § 1; Stats.1987, c. 250,
§ 1. Renumbered § 2551 and amended by Stats.1988, c.1132, § 2, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
Historical and Statutory Notes
1991 Legislation
Under the provisions of § 4 of Stats.1991, c. 711, the 1991 amendments of this section by c. 549 and c.
711 were given effect and incorporated in the form set forth in § 1 of c. 549, operative until ]an. 1,1992,
then in -the form set forth in § 15 of c. 711. an amendment of this section by § 1 of Stats.1991, c. 711,
failed to become operative under the provisions of § 4 of that Act.
A-3
��0011f7
ANNEX A
CHP/CALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
Streets and Highway Code
Historical and Statutory Notes (Conti
Amendment of this section by § 15 of Stats.1991, c. 549, failed to become operative under the provi-
sions of § 5 of that Act.
•
Former § 2551 was renumbered § 2553 and amended by Stats.1988, c.1132, § 5.
Cross References
Highway patrol to answer calls and provide dispatching services for authority, see Vehicle Code
§ 24215.
§ 2551.5. Compensation of members; expenses
The board of supervisors, and the city councils of the cities in the county, may
authorize the members of the service authority to receive for each attendance at meet-
ings of the service authority, and for each day any member is engaged in authorized
service authority business other than attendance at meetings of the service authority,
the maximum sum of one hundred dollars ($100), but not to exceed five hundred dol-
lars ($500) in any calendar month, and to be allowed their actual and necessary ex-
penses incurred in the discharge of their duties.
(Added by Stats.1988, c.1132, § 35, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
§ 2532. Metropolitan transportation commission or Sacramento area council of gov-
ernments as authority for two or more counties; funding
When the Metropolitan Transportation Commission or the Sacramento Area
Council of Governments functions as the service authority for two or more counties,
the revenues which it receives pursuant to Section 9250.10 of the Vehicle Code, after
retention of amounts necessary to reimburse the commission or the council for its
reasonable and necessary administrative costs, shall be expended for implementation,
maintenance, and operation of a motorist aid system within those counties. The amount
expended for each of those counties shall be in the same proportion as the revenues
generated within the county bears to the total revenues received by the eonunission or
the council. Expenditures may be made in a county in addition to revenues propor-
tionately generated if the expenditures are approved by all of the donor county repre-
sentatives on the service authority.
(Amended by Stats.1991, c. 549 (S.13.I254), § 2, eff. Oct. 7,1991.)
(Formerly § 2550.1, added by Stats.1987, c. 250, § 15. Renumbered and amended by Stats.1988, c.1132,
§ 4, eff. Sept. 22, 1988.)
Historical and Statutory Notes
Former § 2552 was renumbered § 2554 and amended by Stats.1988, c. 1132, § 6.
onons
A-4
ANNEX A
CHPICALTRANS CALL AND MO7C.1Cl.i A.10 L.ul✓c.t-lfvc.a
Streets and Highway Code
§ 2553. Membership
An authority, other than the Metropolitan Transportation Commission or a
county transportation commission or a council of governments designated pursu-
ant to Section 2551, shalt have seven members, with two members selected by the
board of supervisors and five members selected jointly by the city councils of cities
within the county.
If the Metropolitan Transportation Commission functions as a service au-
thority, it shall consist of all the members of the commission as set forth in Section
66603 of the Government Code.
If the Sacramento Area Council of Governments functions as a service au-
thority, it shall consist of (a) all of the members of the board of directors of the
council, as set forth in the Joint Powers Agent of the Sacramento Area Council
of Governments. dated October 21,1980, pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with
Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, (b) one member
representing San Joaquin County; and (c) one member representing the cities of
San Joaquin County.
(Amended by Stats.1991, c. 549 (S.B.1254), § 3, eff. Oct. 7,1991; Stats.1991, c. 711 (A.131390), § 25.)
(Formerly § 2551, added by Stats.1985, c.1350, § 2. Amended by Stats.1986, c. 997, § 2; Stats.1987, c.
250, § 2. Renumbered § 2553 and amended by Stats.1988, c.1132 § 5, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
Historical and Statutory Notes
1991 Legislation
Under the provisions of § 5 of Stats.1991, c 711, the 1991 amendments of this section by c. 5.49 and
c. 711 were given effect and incorporated in the form set forth in 53 of c. 549, operative until Jan.1,
1992, then in the form set forth in § 23 of c. 711. An amendment of this section by § 2 of Stats.1991,
c. 711, failed to become operative under the provisions of § 5 of that Act.
Amendment of this section by § 35 of Stats.1991, c. 549, failed to become operative under the
provisions of § 6 of that Act.
Former § 2553 was renumbered § 2555 and amended by Stats.1988, c.1132, § 7.
§ 2554. Duty of authority
An authority may contract and may undertake any act convenient or neces-
sary to carry out this chapter and any other law relating to the authority.
(Formerly § 2552, added by Stats.1985, c.1350, § 2. Renumbered 52554 and amended by Stats.1988,
c.1132, § 6, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
Historical and Statutory Notes
Former § 2554 was renumbered § 2557 and amended by Stats.1988, c.1132, § 8.
A-S
�00119
ANNEX A
CHP/CAiTRANS CALL sox AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
Streets and Highway Code
Notes of Decisions
1. Competitive bidding
Local service authority for freeway emergencies was not required to engage in competitive
bidding in soliciting bids for emergency call box system by fad that county and cities which estab-
lished local authority would be required to engage in competitive bidding if they individually let the
contract; as separate entity, local authority was not subject to Pub.Con.Code §§ 20128 and 20162 requir-
ing competitive bidding of county or participating cities. San Diego Service Authority for Freeway
Emergencies v. Superior Court (Cubic Communications, inc.) (App. 4 Dist»1988) 244 Ca1.Rptr. 440,198
C.A3d 1466.
§ 2555. Fees on registered vehicles of county
An authority may impose a fee, not to exceed one dollar ($1) per year, on ve-
hicles registered in the county pursuant to Section 9250.10 of the Vehicle Code.
(Formerly § 2553, added by Stats.1985, e.1350, § 2. Renumbered § 2555 and amended by Stats.1988, c.
I132, § 7, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
•
Historical and Statutory Notes
Former § 2555 was renumbered § 2558 and amended by Stats.1988, c. 1132, § 9.
§ 2556. Merger of existing authority into authority established by metropolitan trans-
portation commission or Sacramento area council of governments
An existing service authority established by any of the counties or the city and
county enumerated in subdivision (c) of Section 2551 may be merged into a service
authority established by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission or by the
Sacramento Area Council of Governments.
(Amended by Stats.1991, c. 549 (S.B,1254), 5 4, eff. Oct. 7,1991.)
(Added by Stats.1987, c. 250, § 6. Amended by Stats.1988, c.1I32, § 10, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
§ 2557. Use of moneys received on emergency motorist aid system; review and ap-
proval of plans for implementation of system proposed; construction and
maintenance or lease or lease -purchase of facilities; use of excess funds
for additional services
•
(a) Except as provided in subdivisions (c) and (d), the moneys received by each
authority pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 9250.10 of the Vehicle Code shall
be used for the implementation, maintenance, and operation of a motorist aid sys-
tem of call boxes, including the lease or lease -purchase of facilities and equipment
for the system, on the portions of the California Freeway and Expressway System
and a county expressway system, and on state highway routes that connect seg-
ments of these systems, which are located within the county in which the authority
is established and over which the Department of the California Highway Patrol or
an agency designated by that department has law enforcement responsibility. The
Department of Transportation and the Department of the California Highway Patrol
m 0120
A-6
ANNEX A
CHPICALTRANS CALL. SOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
Streets and Highway Code
shall each review and approve plans for implementation of a motorist aid system
proposed for any state highway route and shall be reimbursed by the service au-
thority for all costs incurred.
(b) An authority or any other public entity may construct and maintain, and lease
or lease -purchase on terms the conditions it deems appropriate, the facilities of a
motorist aid system or it may contract with a private person or entity to do so.
(c) If leases or lease -purchase agreements are entered into pursuant to subdivision
(a), or if revenue bonds are issued and sold pursuant to Section 2558, the moneys
received by each authority pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 9250.10 of the Ve-
hicle Code shall be used to the extent necessary to make lease payments or to pay
the principal of, and interest on, the amount of bonded indebtedness outstanding,
as the case may be. Facilities and equipment acquired through the expenditure of
proceeds from the sale of those bonds shall have a useful life at least equal to the
term of the bonds.
(a) (1)Any money received by an authority pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section
9250.10 of the Vehicle Code which exceeds the amount needed for implementation
and ongoing costs to maintain and operate the motorist aid system of call boxes,
installed pursuant to subdivision (a), may be used for purposes of paragraph (2)
and for additional motorist aid services or support, induding, but not limited to, the
following safety -related projects:
(A) Changeable message signs.
(B) Lighting for call'boxes.
(C) Support for traffic operations centers.
(D) Contracting for removal of disabled vehicles from the traveled portion of the
right-of-way.
• (2) Any amendment to an existing plan for a motorist aid system adopted by an
authority for any state highway route shall, prior to implementation, be submitted
to the Department of Transportation and the Department of the California Highway
Patrol for review and approval and shall not be implemented until so reviewed and
approved. The authority shall reimburse each department for the costs of that re-
view.
(e) A motorist aid system constructed, maintained, or operated pursuant to this
section shall meet the applicable standards of Title II of the Americans with Disabili-
ties Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) and federal regulations adopted pursuant
thereto.
(Amended by Stats.1990, c. 282 (A.B.2937), § 1; Stats 1991, c. 751 (S.B565), § 1, eff. Oct 9, 1991;
Stats 1992, c. 913 (A.B. 1077), §41, eff. Jan 1,1993)
A -7
0010121
ANNEX A
CHP/C,ALTRANS CALL. BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
Streets and Highway Code
(Formerly § 2554, added by Stats.1985, c.1350, § 2 Amended by Stats.1986, c.124, § 1; Stats1986, c.
730, § 1; Stats.1986, c. 997, § 35; Stats.1987, c. 250, § 3. Renumbered § 2557 and amended by Stats.1988,
c. 1132, § 8, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
•
Historical and Statutory Notes
Amendment of this section by § 3 of Stats.1986, c. 997, failed to become operative under the provi-
sions of § 5 of that Act. Effect of amendment of section by two or more acts at the same session of the
legislature, see Government Code § 9605.
Library References
Highways 91 /4. WESTLAW Topic No. 200. QS. Highways §§ 176,178.
§ 2558. Revenue bonds; issuance; pledge of revenues; use of proceeds on call
boxes; priority of liens
(a) Subject to subdivision (b), a service authority may issue revenue bonds
pursuant to Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 54300) of Division 2 of Title 5 of
the Government Code, or Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 4950) of Part 3 of
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, as nearly as practicable, for the implemen-
tation and maintenance of a motorist aid system of call bones and shall pledge rev-
enues to be received from fees referred to in Section 2555 as security for the payment
of prindpal or of interest or other amounts due on those revenue bonds. In addition,
a service authority which has entered into one or more leases or lease -purchase agree-
ments for facilities of a motorist aid system may also pledge, as security for the
payment of amounts due under the lease or agreements, revenues to be received
from those fees. The. pledge of revenues provided for in this subdivision shall be a
first and prior lien and,. without any action other than the adoption by the members
of a resolution providing for the pledge, the lien of the pledge shall attach and be-
come perfected as to each fee imposed pursuant to Section 9250.10 of the Vehicle
Code as and when the fee becomes due and payable. However, if a service authority
has, at the same time, existing obligations under one or more issues of revenue bonds,
one or more leases or lease -purchase agreements, or both, the respective priorities of
the liens of pledges of revenue shall be determined on the basis of the respective
dates on which resolutions providing for those pledges were adopted, with the high-
est priority being accorded the pledge of revenues provided for in the earliest of
those resolutions. Bond proceeds shall not be used for operation of a motorist aid
system of call boxes.
(b) A service authority may issue revenue bonds for each county within its
jurisdiction only during the two-year period immediately following the start of the
collection of a fee imposed pursuant to Section 2555 for that county.
(Formerly § 2555, added by Stats.1985, c.1350, § 2. Amended by Stats.1986, c. 997, § 4; Stats1987, c.
►00122
A-8
ANNEX A
CHP/CALT ANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
250, § 4. Renumbered § 2558 and amended by Stats.1988, c. I132, § 9, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
Streets and Highway Code
Notes of Decisions
L Cbmpetitive bidding
Fact that local service authority for freeway emergencies could finance implementation and
maintenance of emergency call box system by issuing revenue bonds pursuant to Gov. Code § 54300 et
seq. and Health & Safety Code § 4950 et seq. containing competitive bidding provisions did not require
local authority to let contract through competitive bidding where financing was accomplished solely
through imposition of vehicle registration fee. San Diego Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies v
Superior Court (Cubic Communications, Inc.) (App. 4 Dist.1988) 244 Cal.Rptr. 440,198 C.A3d 1466.
§ 2559. Removal, damage, or Interference with call box; violation; repair costs
It is a misdemeanor for any person to remove, damage; interfere with the use of,
or obstruct any motorist aid call box provided pursuant to this chapter without the
consent of the authority.
A person convicted under this section may be required by the court to pay to the
service authority the costs of repairing or replacing the call box, in addition to any
other penalty.
(Added by Stats.1988, c.1132, § 11, eff. Sept. 22,1988.)
A -9
J00123
ANNEX B
CNP/CALTRANS CALL BOX AND MOTORIST AID GUIDELINES
Streets and Highway Code
Chapter 2, Article 2
THE CALIFORNIA FREEWAY AND
EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM
Section
250. Establishment and construction of statewide system.
251. Correction of deficiencies on state highway system and connections.
252. Review of freeway and expo sway system; correlation of planning and construction
work; scientific studies.
2525. Repealed.
253. Routes included in freeway and expressway system.
253.1. Composition of freeway and expressway systan. •
2532 Additional indusicros; portions of Routes 1 to 4,1Z 13;16,17 and 20.' '
2533. Additional inclusions; portions of Routes 22, 23, 25, 26, 29, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 43, 45.
253.4. Additional inclusions; portions of Routes 46, 49, 58, 62, 76 and 77.
2535. Additional inclusions; portions of Routes 79, 84, 86, 91, 9Z 94, 95, 99,101 and 110.
253.6. Additionalinclusions; portions of Routes 1I1,113, I16,120,127,128,132.
253.7. Additional inclusions; portions of Routes 137, 138, 142, 152, 160, 166, 168, 170,
178,180,190,193,198.
253.8. Additional inclusions; portions of Routes 227, 244, 299, 395, 480, and 905.
254. Designation of portions of state highways as part of freeway and ocpressway system.
255. Termination of easements of access to state highways
256. Repealed.
256.1. Deletion of highways; notice; hearing.
257. "Freeway and `expressway" defined.
Articic 2 zoos added by Stats.I959, c. I062, p. 3110, § I.
Former Article 2, The
teary State Highways, enacted by Stats1935, c. 29, p. 272, embracing
sections 250, 251, was repealed by Stats.1947, c. 772, p. I852.
Cross References
Authority to lay out. acquire and construct freeways, see § 100.1.
Connections with freeways, see § 1002
Controlled access highways as subject to all Code provisions pertaining to freeways, see § 235.
Emergency water hydrants and telephone or other communication facilities on freeways, see §§
152,153.
Franchises in freeways, see § 683.
Freeway, defined, see § 235.
Location for highways, see § 75.
Utilities in freeways, see § 700 et seq.
Law Review Commentaries
Highway location in California: Federal impact. Arthur R. Silen (1970) 21 Hast.LJ. 781. Urban
freeways and the interstate system. Gary T. Schwartz (1976) 49 So.Cal.LR. 406.
)0Q124
B-1
ANNEX B
CRPKALMANS C.AL L Box AND mer olusr AID curouirms
Streets and Highway Code
Library References
Highway location and construction Reports of Asiernbly Interim Committee on Conservation, Plan-
ning, and Public Works,1955-1957, a oI.13, No.13. Vol. 2 of Appendix to journal of the Assembly, Reg.
Sess.,1957.
g 250. Establishment and construction of statewide system
It is hereby declared to be essential to the future development of the State of
California to establish and construct a statewide system of freeways and expressways
and connections thereto without regard to present jurisdiction over the highways, roads,
and streets that might be included. It is the intent, further, that the California Freeway
and Expressway System be completed with provision for control of access to the extent
necessary to preserve the value and utility of the facilities to be constructed.
(Added by Stats.1959, c.106Z p. 3110, § 1.)
Historical and Statutory Notes
Section 89 of Stats.1959, c.1062, p. 3122, provided: "It is the purpose of the Legislature in
extending lengths of routes presently in the State Highway System and in adding routes to the State
Highway System in this act that additional mileage be incorporated into the State Highway System in
order that said mileage may become a part of the California Freeway and Expressway System. There
shall be no expenditures made on the extensions of state highways added by this act or on any state
highways added by this act other than planning, design, maintenance, right -of --way acquisition and
right-of-way clearance until the 1963-64 Fiscal Year."
Former § 250, enacted by Stats.1935, c. 29, p. 272, derived from Stats.1927, c. 794, p.1562, § 1,
which stated that the highways spedficaliy described in the article were primary state highways, was
repealed by Stats.1947, c. 772, p.1852, § 6.
Law Review Commentaries
Pre-emption aspects of freeway problems. Jack M. Howard (1966)17 Hast.LJ. 571.
Library References
Highways 97 3/4 et seq. WESTLAW Topic No. 200. CJS. Highways § 175.
•
§ 251. Correction of deficiencies on state highway system and connections
It is further declared to be essential to the future development of the State of California
that the deficiencies on the State Highway System not a part of the California Freeway
and Expressway System and deficiencies on connections to the State Highway System
be corrected simultaneously with the highways in the California Freeway and Express-
way System in proportion to the relative defidencies and the needs of traffic service.
(Added by Stats.1959, c. 1062, p. 3111, § 1.)
B-2
►300125
"
- . " " . - _ A N N E X B -
" C H P / C A L T R A N S C A L L B O X A N D M O T O R I S T A I D G U I D E L I N E S
S t r e e t s a n d H i g h w a y C o d e
H i s t o r i c a l a n d S t a t u t o r y N o t e s
F o r m e r � 2 5 1 , e n a c t e d b y S t a t s . 1 9 3 5 , c . 2 9 , p . 2 7 2 , a m e n d e d b y S t a t s . 1 9 3 5 , c . 2 7 4 , p . 9 5 9 ; S t a t s . 1 9 3 7 ,
c . 8 4 1 , p . 2 3 5 9 ; S t a t s . 1 9 3 9 , c . 4 7 3 , p . 1 8 1 9 , � 1 , d e r i v e d f r o m S t a t s . 1 9 2 7 , c . 7 9 4 , p . I 5 6 2 , � 1 ; S t a t s . 1 9 3 3 ,
c . 9 , p p . 1 7 , 1 8 , � � 1 , 3 , w h i c h l i s t e d t h e r o u t e s a n d p o r t i o n s o f r o u t e s w h i c h w e r e p r i m a r y s t a t e
h i g h w a y s , w a s r e p e a l e d b y S t a 6 . 1 9 4 7 , c . 7 7 2 , p . 1 8 5 2 , � 6 .
L i b r a r y R e f e r e n c e s
H i g h w a y s 9 7 3 / 4 e t s e q . W E S i L A W T o p i c N o . 2 0 0 . C J S . H i g h w a y s � 1 7 5 .
� 2 5 2 . R e v i e w o f f r e e w a y a n d e x p r e s s w a y s y s t e m ; c o r r e l a t i o n o f p l a n n i n g a n d
c o n s t r u c t i o n w o r k ; s c i e n t i f i c s t u d i e s
'