HomeMy Public PortalAboutPKT-CC-2016-11-22Moab City Council
November 22, 2016
Pre -Council Workshop
**6:30 PM**
REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING
7:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY CENTER
(217 East Center Street)
Agenda
Page 1 of 167
Agenda
Page 2 of 167
City of Moab
217 East Center Street
Moab, Utah 84532
Main Number (435) 259-5121
Fax Number (435) 259-4135
www.moabcity.org
Moab City Council
Regular Council Meeting
City Council Chambers
Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 6:30 p.m.
6:30 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
SECTION 1:
PRE COUNCIL WORKSHOP
CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1-1 November 1, 2016
1-2 November 8, 2016
SECTION 2: CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
SECTION 3: PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
3-1 A Mayoral Proclamation Valuing Diversity within the Moab Community
3-2 Presentation of the Fiscal Year 2015-2016 by Jon Haderlie of Larson & Company
SECTION 4: DEPARTMENTAL UPDATES
4-1 Community Services
4-2 Engineering
4-3 Public Safety
4-4 Public Works
4-5 Recreation/Trails
4-6 Recorder/Human Resources
4-7 Treasurer
4-8 City Manager
SECTION 5:
SECTION 6:
PUBLIC HEARING (Approximately 7:15 PM)
5-1
Solicitation of Public Input on Proposed Ordinance #2016-14 — An Ordinance
Adopting the City of Moab Pay Plan Schedule For Fiscal Year 2016-2017
SPECIAL EVENTS/VENDORS/BEER LICENSES
6-1 Request by the Moab Resiliency Hub for a Refund of Special Event Fees in an amount
not to exceed $290
6-2 Approval of Permits for the 2017 Moab Rocks Mountain Bike Stage Race and Social
to be held March 24-28, 2017
6-2.1 Approval of a Special Business Event License
6-2.2 Approval of a Class IV Special Event Beer License
6-2.3 Approval of a Park Use Permit for Swanny City Park
6-2.4 Approval of Park Alcohol Permit for Swanny City Park
6-2.5 Approval of Local Consent for a state -issued Special Event Beer Permit
Agenda
Page 3 of 167
SECTION 7: NEW BUSINESS
7-1 Request of Approval of a Sole Source Procurement Request to Great Western Park
and Playground in an amount not to exceed $38,517.34
7-2 Acceptance of Annual Audit for Fiscal Year 2015-2016
7-3 Approval of a License Agreement with Bear Cloud Software for the Use of Short
Term Rental Software
7-4 Approval of the Federal Aid Agreement between the Utah Department of
Transportation and the City of Moab for the Mill Creek Drive Intersection
Improvement project
7-5 Approval of the Project Agreement for the Water Reclamation Facility Site
Preparation Project with Harrison Field Services
7-6 Approval of Task Order #380.06.102 with Hansen, Allen, and Luce, Inc. accepting the
Scope of Work for the 2016-2017 Development Review Support project with a fee
amount not to exceed $50,000
7-7 Request for Approval of a State Contract Lease with Les Olsen Company for a term of
60 months in an amount not to exceed $15,795
7-8 Discussion to Schedule a Public Hearing for a Conditional Use Permit for Dwellings
on the Ground Floor in the C-4 for Property Located at 1600 Mill creek Drive
7-9 Confirmation of a Mayoral Appointment of Chace Gholson to the Moab Mosquito
Abatement District Board for a Term Ending December 31, 2020
7-10 Consideration of Cancelation of Regular City Council Meeting on December 27, 2016
SECTION 8: MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
SECTION 9: READING OF CORRESPONDENCE
SECTION 10: APPROVAL OF BILLS AGAINST THE CITY OF MOAB
SECTION 11: ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should
notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days
prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org
Agenda
Page 4 of 167
MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -- DRAFT
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP/MEETING
NOVEMBER 1, 2016
The Moab City Council held a Special City Council Meeting/Workshop on
the above date in the Council Chambers at the Moab City Center,
located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah.
Mayor Dave Sakrison called the Workshop to order at 5:30 PM. In
attendance were Councilmembers Rani Derasary, Heila Ershadi, Tawny
Knuteson-Boyd, Kyle Bailey and Kalen Jones. Also in attendance were
Interim City Manager David Everitt, City Recorder/Assistant City
Manager Rachel Stenta, City Attorney Chris McAnany, Community
Services Director Amy Weiser, and City Engineer Phillip Bowman.
Approximately 100 members of the public and media were present.
The Workshop consisted of a Presentation by Jeff Beckman and Bob
Mayers of Bowen Collins and Associates regarding the Waste Water
Treatment Plant and a discussion of the City Council on the
consideration and possible approval of Proposed Ordinance #2016-15 —
An Ordinance Enacting a Moratorium on New Connections to the City of
Moab Wastewater Treatment System. The Council invited questions
from the audience.
Mr. Mayers discussed the technical memo and presented a slide show
showing the current facility and described the state of the facility and
the type of treatment that is employed in Moab. He outlined the
standards and measures of BODs (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) and TSS
(Total Suspended Solids) and the biological loading the current facility is
experiencing. He also discussed the variations in high season and cold
season, and pointed out the current plant is overloaded.
Mr. Mayers proposed that hauling the septage from area vault toilets to
Price and/or Blanding for a period of time could increase capacity to
offset the Priority Connections list connection applicants.
Mr. Mayers also discussed some other interim measures that could
alleviate the overload until the new system comes online.
The anticipated schedule for the new wastewater plant was outlined,
November 1, 2016
Page 1 of 6
WORKSHOP MEETING &
ATTENDANCE
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
PRESENTATION
Agenda
Page 5 of 167
with an expected opening date in the Fall of 2018.
Councilmember Jones asked about the odor and Jeff Beckman
responded that sewer odors will exist until the new plant comes online.
The Mayor asked about what the community can do to reduce loading
on the existing system. Beckman replied that garbage disposals add
significantly to the BOD count. The BODs have increased over the years
as in -sink disposals have become more prevalent. He went on to explain
that pouring grease down drains is a problem and should be reduced.
When questioned about pharmaceuticals poured into drains, he
explained that the wastewater treatment plant does not process
pharmaceuticals, so these are poured into the river. Councilmember
Derasary noted that unwanted pharmaceuticals can be taken to the
Sheriff's office or Walker Drug for disposal.
Councilmember Derasary asked about what happens if winter tourism
increases. It was explained that motel units are factored into the ERUs.
The engineers estimated a two percent growth rate every year for a
twenty-year span.
The following Citizens were heard:
William Love asked about downstream chemicals and odors.
The reply was that chlorine kills biological organisms, so chlorine is bad.
Of the new chemicals in use or proposed, the engineer had no data
indicating it can harm the river. Of the polymers discussed, the engineer
was unclear if there is concern; if there is concern, they will try to avoid
the polymers.
Tom Dillon asked about long-term increase of flow.
The answer was that the new plant will nearly double capacity, with a
50% expansion potential.
Rolf Capply asked about definitions in paragraph 5 about the Priority
Connection list.
City Attorney McAnany described the proposed exemptions in the
proposed and partial moratorium.
Developer Gary Blackburn announced he is planning to build twenty
November 1, 2016
Page 2 of 6
COUNCIL DISCUSSION
CITIZENS HEARD
Agenda
Page 6 of 167
units by the golf course. He asked if the Wastewater Treatment Plant
operators could add organisms or increase the heat of the water to
speed processing.
The answer was that there is unproven benefit of introduced organisms
and that heating water is very expensive.
Blackburn also asked about the City's confidence level in the two-year
construction timeline for the new plant.
The Mayor answered that there would be monetary incentives to build
faster and to come online sooner.
Councilmember Derasary asked for a summary of some of the hiccups
the City has experienced, for the benefit of the audience.
The Mayor explained the delay caused by the reported sighting of an
endangered bird, the yellow -billed cuckoo. The US Fish & Wildlife
Service biologists were on -site to investigate and did not find any birds.
The Mayor went on to explain that once the construction is underway,
all the trees must be cleared by year's end to ensure more birds do not
take up habitation.
Councilmember Derasary also asked if the organisms that assist with the
processing of the water treatment are outside, and if enclosed, could
the enclosures be heated.
The response was that the trickling filters are partially enclosed. The
engineer went on to explain that heating the enclosure is not out of the
question, but it is a very expensive proposition.
Councilmember Derasary also commented that, with regard to the
endangered bird, the protocols of the US Fish & Wildlife Service are in
place.
Contractor Richard McElhaney stated that he is working on plans, and
he asked if single family homes will be allowed.
City Attorney McAnany replied that the proposed moratorium allows for
primary residences only, not vacation and second homes.
Moab Springs Ranch owner McKay Edwards asked if projects could be
permitted and constructed, to be queued up for Certificates of
November 1, 2016
Page 3 of 6
Agenda
Page 7 of 167
Occupancy once the new system comes online.
Interim City Manager Everitt replied that yes, that is what is proposed.
Jon Kovash asked about the City's violations with wastewater effluent.
The Mayor explained that since the City is trying to move forward, it is
unlikely that the City will be fined. He went on to explain that the City is
in ongoing discussions with the Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) and that they have delayed the new plant in various ways.
Anne Lawson asked if there were stepped incentives for quick
construction of the plant.
The Mayor explained that yes, this is being discussed.
An unidentified man asked if remodels were to be allowed.
The answer was that the proposed moratorium exempts existing
connections, so that unless a remodel was extreme in its increased
impact, it would be allowed.
Richard Blackburn asked if there would be penalties if the contractor did
not finish the new plant on time?
City Attorney McAnany explained that, yes, typical construction contract
rules would apply, including incentives for early completion and
penalties for delayed completion.
William Love suggested that, instead of raising resident rates, the City
should consider increasing impact fees for developers of large projects.
The response was that the City has considered this and a legal opinion is
required.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd commented that everyone is impacted.
This will be a shared sacrifice.
The Mayor asked the Council if they desired action at the meeting or at
a later date. Councilmember Derasary stated she would like more time,
till November 8. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd stated she would like
more time. Councilmember Derasary said she would like more
information from staff about changing opinions. Councilmember Ershadi
stated she would like to postpone, to gather more input from the public
and the County. Interim City Manager Everitt stated that one option
would be to postpone for three months in order to see if the interim
November 1, 2016
Page 4 of 6
Agenda
Page 8 of 167
measures proposed by the engineers have a significant impact.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd made a motion to table the
consideration of the proposed moratorium indefinitely. Councilmember
Ershadi seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-1 with
Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, and Ershadi voting aye
and Councilmember Derasary voting nay.
Councilmember Bailey asked City Attorney McAnany if there is wisdom
in delay. City Attorney McAnany replied that a run on the bank has
begun for the planning and permitting process. He advised that the City
Council needs to send a clear direction to staff. He went on to state that
sewer services must be tied to issuance of building permits.
Community Development Director Weiser stated that she has heard that
there are concerns that lenders will not issue building loans without the
assurance of future connections. She stated that letters from the City
would be issued to lenders to ensure connectivity for projects exempted
from the moratorium.
William Love stated that the City is in high violation with current
conditions at the wastewater plant. He questioned the prudence of
another three-month delay. He stated that the City needs to stop
digging a deeper hole. By shipping septage to neighboring communities,
this will buy some capacity.
City Attorney McAnany referred to the Priority Connections list and
speculated that several of the larger projects in the permitting process
will likely not come online for some time.
Councilmember Ershadi stated that she wanted to make sure a
moratorium was needed.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd asked if thirty days was enough to tell if
the interim measures would increase capacity. The reply was no.
Councilmember Jones acknowledged that he would be personally
affected in his work as an architect, but he is intent on acting in the
interests of the City.
Councilmember Derasary made a new motion to table the consideration
November 1, 2016
Page 5 of 6
MOTION TO TABLE, APPROVED
NEW MOTION TO TABLE
Agenda
Page 9 of 167
of the proposed moratorium until the next meeting on Tuesday,
November 8. Councilmember Ershadi seconded the motion. The motion
passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi,
and Derasary voting aye.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 PM. ADJOURNMENT
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David L. Sakrison Rachel E. Stenta
Mayor City Recorder
November 1, 2016
Page 6 of 6
Agenda
Page 10 of 167
MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -- DRAFT
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 8, 2016
The Moab City Council held its Regular Meeting on the above date in the
Council Chambers at the Moab City Center, located at 217 East Center
Street, Moab, Utah. A recording of the meeting is archived at
http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html.
Mayor Dave Sakrison called the Workshop to order at 6:30 PM. In
attendance were Councilmembers Rani Derasary, Heila Ershadi, Tawny
Knuteson-Boyd, Kyle Bailey and Kalen Jones. Also in attendance were
Interim City Manager David Everitt, City Recorder/Assistant City
Manager Rachel Stenta, City Attorney Chris McAnany, City Engineer
Phillip Bowman, Community Services Director Amy Weiser, Planning
Director Jeff Reinhart, Treasurer Jennie Ross, Interim Police Chief Steve
Ross, Public Works Administrative Assistant Leigh Anne Reinhart, and
Parks, Recreation and Trails Director Tif Miller.
The Workshop consisted of discussion of Proposed Ordinance #2016-08
— An Ordinance Enacting a Moratorium on New Connections to the City
of Moab Wastewater Treatment System. Councilmembers addressed
questions and comments received from citizens. Councilmember
Derasary related citizens' questions about the status of negotiations
between the City and the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ),
chemicals proposed to be used in the current plant to optimize
efficiency, limiting hotel occupancy to 80% to reduce the load on the
current plant, and rerouting of septage from the area's vault toilets.
Councilmember Bailey asked about timeline for the wastewater
treatment plant design. The Mayor, City Attorney McAnany, Interim City
Manager Everitt, and City Engineer Bowman responded to the various
questions.
City Engineer Bowman stated that the interim mitigation efforts to
increase efficiency of the current plant during construction is now
estimated to cost between $300,000 and $400,000 and was estimated
earlier to cost about $50,000.
Councilmember Ershadi commented that all costs are going up and that
a discussion of budget is needed. Councilmember Bailey stated that the
November 8, 2016
Page 1 of 9
REGULAR MEETING &
ATTENDANCE
PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP
Agenda
Page 11 of 167
consulting engineer is doing a revised rate study; sewer rates will all
need to be reviewed. Interim City Manager Everitt noted that the annual
budget process will be a time to discuss costs, and added that a five-year
plan is good practice. He also asked if current staffing levels are
adequate. Councilmember Bailey stated that the new Public Works
Director starts November 21, and many other positions are open.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd raised the question of how to enforce
the "primary residence" rule in the proposed moratorium. Interim City
Manager Everitt replied that enforcement of any code issue is always a
concern and the current mode is a complaint -driven process for
enforcement. City Attorney McAnany added that it would be a Class B
Misdemeanor and explained the repercussions of this type of violation.
Mayor Sakrison called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00
PM and led the pledge of allegiance. Fifty-three (53) members of the
public and media were present.
Councilmember Derasary moved to approve the minutes of October 11,
25, and 31, 2016 meetings with corrections provided by
Councilmembers Derasary and Ershadi. Councilmember Jones seconded
the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey,
Ershadi, Jones, Derasary and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye.
There were no Citizens to be heard.
Mayor Sakrison presented Pierson Vagts with the Mayor's Student
Citizenship of the Month Award for November 2016 for Helen M. Knight
School.
At 7:15 PM Mayor Sakrison opened a public hearing on Proposed
Ordinance #2016-08 — An Ordinance Amending Chapter 13.25 of the
City of Moab Municipal Code with New Amounts for the Sewer Impact
Fees. There were no citizens to be heard so the Mayor kept the hearing
open. He closed the hearing later in the meeting, with no comments
before the proposed ordinance was considered.
Under Community Services Update, Community Services Director
Weiser reported on an update of the Affordable Housing Plan. She
noted a request by Zacharia Levine, Grand County Community
November 8, 2016
Page 2 of 9
REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO
ORDER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
PRESENTATION OF STUDENT
OF THE MONTH
PUBLIC HEARING
DEPARTMENTAL UPDATES
Agenda
Page 12 of 167
Development Director to hold a joint City/County council meeting.
Weiser also reported that there is an effort underway to secure housing
for the wastewater treatment plant contractors and also that the City's
parade float is in the works.
City Engineer Phillip Bowman reported on the Engineering Department
Update, stating that the City is re -advertising the unfilled engineer
position. He also mentioned discussions with UDOT regarding a
proposed turn lane onto MiVida Drive from north Highway 191, and a
proposed speed radar sign to be installed on the south end of town. He
also noted the sewer rehabilitation project is wrapping up.
Interim Police Chief Ross presented the Public Safety report. The police
department has a new secretary. He also noted he met with the school
superintendent about public relations efforts of the department.
Councilmember Derasary asked about the department's presence at
Trunk or Treat and Ross replied the event is posted on the Police
Department's Facebook page and they received good feedback on the
effort.
Administrative Assistant Reinhart reported the Public Works team has
been occupied with routine duties which were detailed in her report.
Highlights included a report that a new Mosquito Abatement District
Director was hired. Christmas lights are being installed, and flags were in
place for Election Day and Veterans' Day. Also, work is being done on an
educational flyer about the sanitary sewer to inform citizens about how
households can optimize performance of the City's wastewater
treatment facility. Councilmember Bailey brought up that Art
Wollenwebber at Spanish Valley Water and Sewer Improvement District
has a similar brochure completed.
Under Recreation, Parks and Trails Department, Director Tif Miller
announced the annual Turkey Trot on November 22. It will include a
food drive for the local food bank. He noted that the last Art Walk of
the season would be the following Saturday and the next one would be
in April.
Under Recorder and Human Resources Report, City Recorder/Assistant
City Manager Stenta reported on Human Resources, mentioning the
renewal of the self -funded employee health insurance. She noted that
November 8, 2016
Page 3 of 9
Agenda
Page 13 of 167
staff are exploring wellness incentives to help keep costs down and
improve health of employees. She reported that the salary survey team
has been meeting and is reviewing Pay for Performance models and the
pay plan which will be presented for a public hearing on November 22. A
survey of the proposed salary model is being conducted with all staff.
The Recorder's office has been working on training for the new
purchasing policy. She also reported that the budget opening would be
after health insurance final costs are in, and the new pay plan is in
place —should be early January. Stenta mentioned she had met with
bond counsel and financial counsel regarding CIB monies for USU and
the wastewater treatment plant. She also reported that work is being
done on the various GRAMA requests. Councilmember Derasary
thanked Stenta and her team for work on the CIB funding.
Under Treasurer Report, City Treasurer Ross updated the Council that
utility bills have been sent and the water meters have been read.
Interim City Manager Everitt reported that he is working on the
wastewater treatment issues, as well as staffing. He is working on hiring
a new staff engineer and a police chief. He mentioned he may utilize a
recruiting firm for the police chief position.
Under Consideration and Possible Approval of Proposed Ordinance
#2016-15—An Ordinance Enacting a Moratorium on New Connections
to the City of Moab Wastewater Treatment System, Councilmember
Jones reiterated he has professional interests that would be negatively
affected by the proposed ordinance. He then moved to adopt the
proposed ordinance with amendments to include provisions for
affordable housing. Councilmember Derasary seconded the motion.
Citizen William Love pointed out the City may enforce the existing
wastewater contract to limit new connections without a moratorium.
Discussion ensued with Councilmember Jones pointing out that the
temporary moratorium will help the City to manage its risk regarding
effluent violations. He noted the best -case scenario may not come to
pass. He proposed a sunset date. A hierarchy of connections was
discussed, as well as definitions for affordable housing. Councilmember
Derasary stated that embracing the status quo got the City to where it is
now and the City has an obligation to act under the authority of the
November 8, 2016
Page 4 of 9
MOTION TO APPROVE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-
15 WITH AMENDMENTS,
FAILED
Agenda
Page 14 of 167
Clean Water Act. She noted that a false sense of capacity has been
estimated. Mayor Sakrison asked City Attorney McAnany to explain the
proposed exemptions to the moratorium. He clarified the priority
connections list and primary residences, and also explained that
Councilmember Jones' proposed amendments would place primary
residences under moratorium until March, and would also exempt
affordable housing units.
Mayor Sakrison asked if this expanded definition would expand the
City's legal exposure. City Attorney McAnany allowed that the City is
liable for violations, so either way, the City and its citizens are exposed.
Councilmember Bailey asked how the proposed moratorium would end.
City Attorney McAnany replied that Section 6 directs staff to implement
and study the effects, with no specific sunset provision. Interim City
Manager Everitt clarified that the moratorium would be in place until
the Council moves to repeal it.
More discussion ensued between Mayor Sakrison, Councilmember
Bailey, and Councilmember Ershadi regarding mitigation efforts. Greg
Fosse, Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator, answered questions from
the Mayor and Councilmembers Knuteson-Boyd and Ershadi about
current plant efficiency.
Councilmember Ershadi stated the City is in compliance now. She stated
that a moratorium should be a last-ditch effort. She continued that
being slightly in or out of compliance is not very different.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd stated that, with so many exemptions, it
is not a real moratorium. She agreed that a moratorium should be a last-
ditch effort. She stated her concern about the human cost of layoffs in
the construction industry.
Councilmember Derasary pointed out that the City Council must uphold
the state constitution. She warned that the City could be sued by any
number of sides. She stated the Council owes it to the future.
Councilmember Ershadi suggested that composting toilets might help
mitigate the impacts.
November 8, 2016
Page 5 of 9
Agenda
Page 15 of 167
The question was called, and the motion failed 2-3 with
Councilmembers Derasary and Jones voting aye and Councilmembers
Ershadi, Knuteson-Boyd and Bailey voting nay.
Councilmember Bailey moved to adopt the original motion with an
expiration date of six months. Councilmember Jones seconded the
motion.
Councilmember Bailey pointed out we are not yet permitted for
construction and it is premature to think the new plant can come online
in two years. Councilmember Ershadi stated the City should wait.
Councilmember Jones noted the liability for the City to knowingly violate
the permit and this partial moratorium is far more sensitive to local
needs than if the State imposes a full moratorium for lack of
compliance. Councilmember Ershadi stated stopgap measures are
working and again stated a moratorium should be a last-ditch effort.
Councilmember Derasary stated this is a serious situation and the City
must enforce the law. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd stated that the
number of exemptions on the list raise the question of whether or not
the moratorium will do anything to help.
The motion passed 3-2 with Councilmembers Derasary, Jones, and
Bailey voting aye and Councilmembers Ershadi and Knuteson-Boyd
voting nay.
Councilmember Jones proposed to offer informal direction to Interim
City Manager Everitt to create a wastewater mitigation plan for the
Council's next meeting.
Councilmember Bailey moved to approve an unbudgeted emergency
purchase of a 185 CFM Air Compressor from Cate Equipment at a cost
not to exceed $20,000.00. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion.
The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-
Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary voting aye.
Councilmember Derasary moved to approve the purchase order for trip
hazard mitigation by Precision Concrete Cutting in the amount of
$24,925.00. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion
passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi,
November 8, 2016
Page 6 of 9
MOTION TO APPROVE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-
15 WITH A SIX MONTH
EXPIRATION DATE, APPROVED
EMERGENCY STATE CONTRACT
PURCHASE OF AIR
COMPRESSOR, APPROVED
SOLE SOURCE TRIP HAZARD
MITIGATION PURCHASE,
APPROVED
Agenda
Page 16 of 167
and Derasary voting aye.
Councilmember Jones moved to approve Task Order #16-06 with Bowen
Collins & Associates, Inc., accepting the Scope of Work for the
Wastewater Treatment Plant Additional Engineering Assistance project
with a fee amount not to exceed $66,956. Councilmember Derasary
seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers
Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary voting aye.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve Task Order #16-07
with Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc., accepting the Scope of Work for
the Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Permitting Assistance
project with a fee amount not to exceed $45,384. Councilmember Jones
seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers
Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and Derasary voting aye.
Councilmember Derasary moved to approve Task Order #16-08 with
Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc., accepting the Scope of Work for
General Engineering Assistance with a fee amount not to exceed
$40,000. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The
motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd,
Ershadi, and Derasary voting aye.
Councilmember Bailey moved to adopt Proposed Ordinance #2016-08 —
An Ordinance Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code, Sections
13.25.060 B and 13.25.060 C to modify the Sewer Impact Fee.
Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion
passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi,
and Derasary voting aye.
Councilmember Derasary moved to approve Proposed Resolution #28-
2016 authorizing the issuance and confirming the sale of wastewater
revenue bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed
$11,500,000 (the "Bonds") of the City of Moab, Grand County, Utah (the
"Issuer"), calling a public hearing and establishing a time, place and
location for said public hearing to receive input from the public with
respect to the issuance of bonds and any potential economic impact to
the private sector from the construction of the project to be funded by
the bonds; providing for a pledge of wastewater revenues for the
payment of the bonds; fixing the maximum principal amount of the
November 8, 2016
Page 7 of 9
TASK ORDER FOR
WASTEWATER ENGINEERING,
APPROVED
TASK ORDER FOR
WASTEWATER PERMITTING
ASSISTANCE, APPROVED
TASK ORDER FOR GENERAL
ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE,
APPROVED
PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-
08 — SEWER IMPACT FEES,
APPROVED
PROPOSED RESOLUTION #28-
2016 -- BOND ISSUANCE,
APPROVED
Agenda
Page 17 of 167
bonds; the maximum number of years over which the bonds may
mature, the maximum interest rate which the bonds may bear, and the
maximum discount from par at which the bonds may be sold; providing
for the running of a contest period; and related matters.
Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. Alex Buxton with Zions
Bank made a presentation about the bonding process. The motion
passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi,
and Derasary voting aye.
City Attorney McAnany discussed the proposed agreement between
Moab City and the Spanish Valley Water and Sewer Water Improvement
District in light of the moratorium passed earlier in the meeting. The
agreement is required to secure funding from the state for new plant.
Discussion ensued between the Mayor, Council, Art Wollenwebber,
Interim City Manager Everitt, and McAnany about possible amendments
to the resolution that take into account the issue of capacity and the
moratorium. Councilmember Bailey moved to authorize the Mayor and
City Attorney McAnany to reconcile the moratorium language with the
language of the Proposed Resolution #29-2016 — A Resolution Approving
An Agreement Between Spanish Valley Water And Sewer Water
Improvement District And The City of Moab, with amendments.
Councilmember Derasary seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0
with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd, Ershadi, and
Derasary voting aye.
Councilmember Ershadi moved to approve Proposed Resolution #30-
2016 — A Resolution Adopting the Moab Wastewater Treatment Plan —
Facilities Master Plan. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The
motion passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bailey, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd,
Ershadi, and Derasary voting aye.
Councilmember Bailey noted that he attended the meeting of
preliminary findings from the water study.
Councilmember Jones noted he attended a solid waste meeting.
Mayor Sakrison noted he is discussing writing a CIB grant for $1.1 million
for... He noted that he attempted to negotiate a partial grant/loan
combination with CIB, without success. He went on to state that San
Juan County received very generous terms from CIB for a similar project.
There was discussion about the advantage of having a Grand County
representative on the CIB board. Tom Stocks was the last known
November 8, 2016
Page 8 of 9
PROPOSED RESOLUTION #29-
2016 SPANISH VALLEY WATER
AND SEWER AGREEMENT,
APPROVED
PROPOSED RESOLUTION #30-
2016 WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITIES
MASTER PLAN, APPROVED
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
REPORTS
Agenda
Page 18 of 167
representative.
Councilmember Ershadi mentioned HMK school would hold their
Veterans Day assembly on Thursday.
Councilmember Derasary attended the meeting of the Colorado
Association of Ski Towns (CAST), which is comprised of towns with
similar issues to Moab including overcrowding, housing shortages, noise,
festival fatigue, and etc.
Derasary also mentioned the upcoming League of Women Voters event
about the minimum wage on November 14 at 5:15pm at the MARC.
Councilmember Derasary moved to pay the bills against the City of
Moab in the amount of $286,096.07. Councilmember Jones seconded
the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye, with Councilmembers Bailey,
Ershadi, Jones, Derasary and Knuteson-Boyd voting aye.
Councilmember Jones moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember
Ershadi seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye. Mayor
Sakrison adjourned at 9:25 PM.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David L. Sakrison Rachel E. Stenta
Mayor City Recorder
November 8, 2016
Page 9 of 9
APPROVAL OF BILLS
ADJOURNMENT
Agenda
Page 19 of 167
AGENDA SUMMARY
MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 22, 2016
/ /
Agenda ltem
#: 5-1
Title: Solicitation of Public Input on Proposed Ordinance #2016-14 — An
Ordinance Adopting the City of Moab Pay Plan Schedule For Fiscal Year 2016-
2017
Fiscal Impact: Budgeted Impact of $227,836
Staff Presenter(s): Rachel Stenta, City Recorder/Assistant City Manager
Department: Recorder/Human Resources
Applicant: N/A
Background/Summary: The next step in implementing the results of the salary
survey is a public hearing. I've prepared an informational handout outlining
aspects of the background and the process. I apologize that it is a lengthy
explanation, but given the overall time invested in the process and the potential
outcomes, I felt a detailed and transparent explanation would be helpful to
everyone.
Several additional items will need to be approved in December to implement the
new pay ranges, including a minor revision to the Personnel Policies and
Procedures manual to allow a Pay for Performance compensation model along
with annual adoption of the pay ranges and several other housekeeping items
pertaining to vacation and on -call pay.
During this process, the Deputy Recorder II/Human Resources Coordinator has
also re-evaluated previously designated exempt positions in alignment with the
Fair Labor Standards Act and would like to present a modified list of exempt
positions within the City for approval at the December 13, 2016 meeting.
1
Options: Solicit public input
Staff Recommendation: Solicit public input
Recommended Motion: no action required at this meeting
Attachment(s): Proposed Ordinance #2016-14
Salary Survey Process Summary
CITY OF MOAB
PUBLIC HEARING
PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2016-14
The City of Moab will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at
approximately 7:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moab City Offices at 217
East Center Street, Moab, Utah.
The purpose of this hearing is to solicit public input on Proposed Ordinance #2016-
14 — An Ordinance Adopting the City of Moab Pay Plan Schedule For Fiscal Year
2016-2017.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special
accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217
East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3)
working days prior to the meeting.
/s/ Rachel E. Stenta
City Recorder/Assistant City Manager
Published in the Times Independent, November 10 and 17, 2016.
Agenda
R:\Recorder\Notices\2016\ph ord 2016-14 salaries.docx
Page 20 of 167
ORDINANCE NO.2016-14
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF MOAB PAY PLAN SCHEDULE
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
WHEREAS, the Moab City Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual allows that pay
ranges may be adjusted periodically for comparable work in other municipalities; and
WHEREAS, the Moab City Personnel, Policies and Procedures Manual calls for annual
surveys of salaries; and
WHEREAS, the City has conducted a comprehensive salary survey through the
utilization of Personnel Systems Inc. and has presented the survey results to the
Governing Body; and
WHEREAS, the proposed "City of Moab 2016 Proposed Pay Plan" is attached to this
resolution as Attachment A, respectively; and
WHEREAS, Moab Municipal Code Section 2.44.010 states that all salaries of the
elective and appointive officers of the City and the other employees of the City shall be
fixed by motion or resolution of the City Council as in accordance with existing law.
NOW, THEREFORE, WE, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MOAB
RESOLVE TO ADOPT The City of Moab 2016 Proposed Pay Plan (Attachment A) as
referred herein effective January 1, 2017.
DATED this 22nd day of November 2016.
ATTEST:
Rachel E. Stenta
City Recorder
SIGNED:
David L. Sakrison
Mayor
Agenda
rdinance #2016-14 November 22, 2016
Page 21 of 167
Ordinance 42016-14
Attachment A
JOB TITLE
ADMIN ASSISTANT - AQUATIC
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT I
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT II
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT II
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER
ANIMAL CONTROL SUPERVISOR
ANIMAL SHELTER MANAGER
AQUATIC CENTER MANAGER
AQUATIC MANAGER
ARTS/SPECIAL EVENTS MANAGER
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/RECORDER
ASSISTANT PLANNER
ASSISTANT TO CITY ENGINEER
CITY ENGINEER
CITY MANAGER
CITY PLANNER
CITY TREASURER
CIVIL ENGINEER SENIOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR
DEPUTY RECORDER
DEPUTY RECORDER II/HR
DEPUTY TREASURER
FILM COMMISSION COORDINATOR
LIEUTENANT
LIFEGUARD
PARKS SERVICE WORKER I
PARKS SERVICE WORKER II
PARKS SERVICE WORKER III
PARKS SUPERINTENDENT
PARKS,RECREATION & TRAILS ASSISTANT
PARKS/RECREATION/TRAILS DIRECTOR
POLICE CHIEF
POLICE OFFICER I
POLICE OFFICER II
POLICE OFFICER II/DRUG ENFORCEMENT
POLICE OFFICER III
POLICE OFFICER III/DRUG ENFORCEMENT
PUBLIC FACILITIES SUPERINTENDENT
PUBLIC FACILITIES SERVICE WORKER I/CUSTODIAN
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
RECORDER ASSISTANT
SERGEANT
SEWER DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
SPORTS/RECREATION ASSISTANT
SPORTS/RECREATION MANAGER
STREETS SERVICE WORKER I
STREETS SERVICE WORKER II/CDL
STREETS SERVICE WORKER II/MECHANIC
STREETS SERVICE WORKER III/CDL
STREETS SERVICE WORKER III/MECHANIC
STREETS SUPERINTENDENT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR/SUPERINTENDENT
WATER DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER I
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER I/METER READER
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER II/CDL
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER II/WWTP
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER III
Hourly Pay Rates
Minimum
$15.91
$17.49
$19.27
$17.58
$19.27
$16.49
$20.12
$20.90
$25.62
$21.36
$21.78
$43.68
$20.77
$19.69
$35.99
$55.12
$28.09
$22.22
$27.42
$33.05
$20.61
$17.75
$28.05
$18.55
$23.63
$28.65
$16.48
$16.70
$17.18
$17.89
$24.88
$16.72
$32.97
$36.38
$19.85
$20.44
$20.44
$21.29
$21.29
$24.00
$15.61
$36.32
$17.78
$24.50
$25.96
$16.95
$22.65
$16.97
$17.50
$18.46
$19.10
$21.51
$25.27
$27.06
$26.23
$17.13
$17.07
$17.67
$18.59
$18.95
Pay Range
Midpoint
$19.89
$21.86
$24.09
$21.98
$24.09
$20.61
$25.14
$26.13
$32.02
$26.70
$27.23
$54.60
$25.97
$24.61
$44.99
$68.90
$35.11
$27.78
$34.27
$41.31
$25.76
$22.18
$35.07
$23.19
$29.54
$35.82
$20.61
$20.87
$21.47
$22.36
$31.10
$20.91
$41.21
$45.47
$24.82
$25.55
$25.55
$26.62
$26.62
$30.00
$19.51
$45.40
$22.23
$30.63
$32.45
$21.18
$28.31
$21.21
$21.88
$23.08
$23.88
$26.89
$31.59
$33.83
$32.79
$21.42
$21.34
$22.09
$23.24
$23.69
Maximum
$23.87
$26.24
$28.90
$26.38
$28.90
$24.74
$30.17
$31.36
$38.43
$32.04
$32.67
$65.52
$31.16
$29.54
$53.99
$82.68
$42.13
$33.33
$41.13
$49.58
$30.91
$26.62
$42.08
$27.83
$35.45
$42.98
$24.73
$25.04
$25.77
$26.83
$37.32
$25.09
$49.45
$54.56
$29.78
$30.67
$30.67
$31.94
$31.94
$36.00
$23.41
$54.48
$26.67
$36.75
$38.94
$25.42
$33.97
$25.45
$26.25
$27.69
$28.66
$32.27
$37.91
$40.60
$39.35
$25.70
$25.61
$26.51
$27.88
$28.43
Monthly Pay Rates
Pay Range
Annual Pay Rates
Pay Range
Minimum
Midpoint
Maximum
Minimum Midpoint Maximum
$2,758
$3,032
$3,340
$3,048
$3,340
$2,859
$3,487
$3,623
$4,441
$3,702
$3,775
$7,571
$3,601
$3,413
$6,239
$9,555
$4,868
$3,852
$4,753
$5,729
$3,572
$3,076
$4,863
$3,216
$4,096
$4,966
$2,857
$2,894
$2,978
$3,101
$4,312
$2,899
$5,714
$6,305
$3,441
$3,544
$3,544
$3,691
$3,447
$3,790
$4,175
$3,810
$4,175
$3,573
$4,358
$4,529
$5,551
$4,628
$4,719
$9,464
$4,501
$4,266
$7,799
$11,943
$6,085
$4,814
$5,941
$7,161
$4,465
$3,845
$6,078
$4,020
$5,120
$6,208
$3,572
$3,617
$3,722
$3,876
$5,390
$3,624
$7,143
$7,881
$4,301
$4,429
$4,429
$4,613
$4,137
$4,548
$5,010
$4,572
$5,010
$4,288
$5,230
$5,435
$6,661
$5,553
$5,663
$11,356
$5,401
$5,119
$9,358
$14,332
$7,302
$5,777
$7,129
$8,593
$5,357
$4,614
$7,294
$4,824
$6,144
$7,450
$4,286
$4,341
$4,466
$4,651
$6,469
$4,348
$8,571
$9,458
$5,162
$5,315
$5,315
$5,536
$3,691
$4,613
$5,536
$4,160
$2,705
$6,295
$5,201
$3,382
$7,869
$6,241
$4,058
$9,443
$3,082
$4,247
$4,500
$2,937
$3,925
$2,941
$3,034
$3,200
$3,312
$3,729
$4,381
$4,691
$4,547
$2,970
$2,959
$3,063
$3,222
$3,285
$3,853
$5,309
$5,625
$3,672
$4,907
$3,676
$3,792
$4,000
$4,139
$4,661
$5,476
$5,864
$5,683
$3,713
$3,699
$3,829
$4,028
$4,106
$4,623
$6,371
$6,750
$4,406
$5,888
$4,411
$4,551
$4,800
$4,967
$5,593
$6,571
$7,037
$6,820
$4,455
$4,439
$4,595
$4,833
$4,928
$33,096
$36,382
$40,078
$36,574
$40,078
$34,302
$41,841
$43,480
$53,289
$44,424
$45,303
$90,851
$43,212
$40,956
$74,866
$114,655
$58,419
$46,219
$57,030
$68,746
$42,860
$36,912
$58,350
$38,591
$49,153
$59,598
$34,287
$34,726
$35,731
$37,209
$51,749
$34,787
$68,571
$75,660
$41,294
$42,523
$42,523 $53,154 $63,784
$44,288 $55,360 $66,432
$44,288 $55,360 $66,432
$49,925 $62,407 $74,888
$32,463 $40,578 $48,694
$75,540 $94,425 $113,310
$36,984 $46,230 $55,476
$50,965 $63,707 $76,448
$54,003 $67,504 $81,005
$35,247 $44,059 $52,871
$47,104 $58,880 $70,656
$35,290 $44,112 $52,935
$36,406 $45,507 $54,609
$38,400 $48,000 $57,600
$39,738 $49,673 $59,607
$44,746 $55,933 $67,119
$52,570 $65,712 $78,855
$56,294 $70,368 $84,441
$54,559 $68,198 $81,838
$35,641 $44,551 $53,461
$35,509 $44,387 $53,264
$36,757 $45,946 $55,135
$38,666 $48,332 $57,999
$39,421 $49,277 $59,132
$41,370
$45,478
$50,097
$45,718
$50,097
$42,878
$52,301
$54,350
$66,612
$55,531
$56,628
$113,563
$54,014
$51,195
$93,582
$143,318
$73,024
$57,774
$71,288
$85,933
$53,574
$46,141
$72,938
$48,239
$61,442
$74,497
$42,859
$43,407
$44,664
$46,511
$64,686
$43,484
$85,714
$94,575
$51,618
$53,154
$49,644
$54,573
$60,117
$54,861
$60,117
$51,453
$62,761
$65,220
$79,934
$66,637
$67,954
$136,276
$64,817
$61,434
$112,299
$171,982
$87,628
$69,329
$85,545
$103,119
$64,289
$55,369
$87,525
$57,887
$73,730
$89,397
$51,431
$52,089
$53,596
$55,814
$77,623
$52,181
$102,856
$113,490
$61,941
$63,784
Agenda
Updated on: 11/14/2016
Page 22 of 167
R:\RecordenSalary Survey01-08-2016\Market Analysis - Moab 11-8-2016
City of Moab
217 East Center Street
Moab, Utah 84532-2534
Main Number (435) 259-5121
Fax Number (435) 259-4135
Mayor:
Council:
Moab City Salary Survey
David L. Sakrison
Kyle Bailey
Rani Derasary
Heila Ershadi
Kalen Jones
Tawny Knuteson-Boyd
Background Information
As outlined in Moab City Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual Salary Policy
section 3.3:
The City Manager and department heads shall be responsible for the development of a
uniform and equitable pay plan that consists of a minimum and maximum rate of pay for
each class of positions. The salary ranges are linked to the classes of position in the
classification plan. In arriving at salary ranges, consideration should be given to:
(A) Maintenance of correct relationships between the salary grades of various
positions in the City service.
(B) The duties and responsibilities of the position.
(c) The comparable wage rates for similar work in other municipalities within
the State of Utah.
(D) The financial position of the City.
Also, Section 3.4 states that "pay ranges may be adjusted periodically on the
basis of annual survey of salaries paid for comparable work in other
municipalities within the State of Utah, within the limits of federal wage and price
guidelines". Pay ranges have not been adjusted based on a formal,
comprehensive salary survey in at least the last 19 years.
To accomplish the updating of our pay plan in 2016, the City conducted a
comprehensive salary survey utilizing the services of Personnel Systems Inc.
(attachment 1).
Survey Methodology
1. Update and develop job descriptions
2. Solicit worth of work values from our employees through an internal
survey
3. Evaluate positions relative to organizational worth of work values
4. Compare those positions pay ranges within a comparable labor market
Process
The process began with department heads revising and updating job
descriptions that were then reviewed by the Personnel Officer (City Manager).
That process began in June of 2015. At the same time, a new performance
evaluation form
Agenda
First EPA Green Power Community in the Nation
Page 23 of 167
was developed and implemented citywide (attachment 2). This evaluation form
incorporates a performance based rating system that is consistent with other
government agency models.
A Worth of Work values survey was developed by the consultant and distributed
to all employees. The survey was voluntary and 47 employees participated.
Responses were compiled and used to weight our internal equity values in four
categories: Job Knowledge, Responsibility, Difficulty and Work Environment. The
consultant then performed an assessment and rating of all job descriptions based
on the internally weighted four areas of worth of work value.
Simultaneously, an employee salary survey committee was then formed with
representatives from each department.
Committee Members are:
Name
Title
Department Represented
Mike Huts
Parks Superintendent
Public Works/Parks
Chantel Lindsay
Deputy Treasurer
Treasurer
Leigh Anne Reinhart
Administrative Assistant
Public Works
Obe Tejada
Sewer Superintendent
Public Works/Sewer
Cindy Montague
Administrative Assistant
Police Department
Bret Edge
Sergeant
Police Department
Terry Lewis
MRAC Director
Recreation
Justin Marcus
Sports/Recreation Manager
Recreation
Phillip Bowman
City Engineer
Engineering
Chet Wareham
Streets Service Worker III
Public Works/Streets
Danielle Guerrero
Deputy Recorder/HR Coordinator
Recorder Human Resources
Rachel Stenta
City Recorder/Assistant City
Manager
Recorder/Administration
The committee met over several months and reviewed different aspects of the
process including selecting targeted market communities for comparisons in our
salary survey. The committee members disseminated information within their
departments, answered questions and brought comments back to the overall
committee. The Personnel Officer and the Committee members conducted a
market review and analysis to determine the city's competitive relationship with
selected Utah and Colorado public employers and selections were made as
follows:
AMERICAN FORK, UT
PARK CITY, UT
ASPEN, CO
ROOSEVELT, UT
BOUNTIFUL, UT
SILVERTHORNE, CO
BRECKENRIDGE, CO
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO
CEDAR CITY, UT
SPANISH FORK, UT
DILLON, CO
ST. GEORGE, UT
DURANGO, CO
STATE OF UTAH, UT
ESTES PARK, CO
STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO
FRASER, CO
TELLURIDE, CO
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO
VAIL, CO
GRAND COUNTY, UT
VERNAL, UT
MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, CO
WASATCH COUNTY, UT
PAGOSA SPRINGS, CO
WINTER PARK, CO
Agenda
Page 24 of 167
Next the consultant compared City positions within the identified market group
and then developed a "Market Based" pay plan model Linking Internal Equity
results to prevailing pay practices. The proposed pay plan model is a "range"
model consisting of minimum, midpoint and maximum which would replace
the previously used and outdated "step and grade" compensation model.
Results
The consultant, Mike Swallow, presented the results of the process to the Salary
Survey Committee and then to the City Council at a public meeting held on
October 11, 2016. Some highlights of the survey were:
• City's current minimum pay fell 25.6% below the market
• City's current midpoint pay fell 11 % below the market
• City's current maximum pay fell 2% below the market
• City's overall average pay fell 18.3% below the market
Examining the averages showed that the City pay minimums trailed the market
on average-25.6%, but most significantly at the lower end of the pay ranges.
This is where the City experiences the highest turnover; entry level positions that
typically fall at the lower end of the pay ranges.
The proposed pay plan is before you as a public hearing this evening
(attachment 3). The proposed pay plan represents revised pay ranges for all city
positions (with the exception of seasonal positions) with the lowest anticipated
wage being $15.61 per hour.
mpiementation
We anticipated adjusting pay ranges this fiscal year and budgeted salary
adjustments in the amount of $227,836. A least cost implementation was
developed for the remainder of this fiscal year and is reflected in three phases
(attachment 4).
Phase 1
The first priority would be to ensure that all city workers are at least within the
adopted ranges, meaning that anyone below the minimum would be moved to
minimum through a base pay adjustment. This will have an immediate and
substantial impact on our entry level positions in several departments with the
most impact in Public Works and the Police Department. Please refer to the
attached Survey Range and Average Pay regression analysis chart
(attachment ) for a visual representation of how many positions (not
employees) currently fall below the minimum ranges.
Phase 2
The second priority would be to make salary adjustments to positions based on
the progression to midpoint. Employees whose service years are at or exceed
seven years can be expected to be paid at or above midpoint. Phase 2
Agenda
Page 25 of 167
would make base pay adjustments to employees with 7+ years of service whose
compa-ratio is below 100% (compa-ratio = payrate / midpoint). Generally an
employee's compa-ratio would be below 100% if they were new to the
organization. Phase 2 would move those employees to the midpoint of their pay
range. The survey results demonstrated that at Moab City, as jobs become more
technical, professional, administrative and managerial there is more stability and
longevity. Newer management level positions are already at or approaching
midpoint as they were filled by offering market driven pay rates which created
some disparity with existing positions. This adjustment will relieve that issue as
well as offer recognition for proficiency and skill development.
Phase 3
The purpose of Phase 3 is to recognize any pay progression disparity issues
within pay ranges created by longevity in that position. As the proposed pay
plan is a Pay for Performance (P4P) tool which differs from our previous model,
we did not feel it was entirely equitable to compensate for longevity on a one -
for -one basis. for all years of service. This phase would make base pay
adjustments for employees with 8-10 years of service at a rate of 1% per year
(max of 3%). Employees with 11+ years would receive a fixed pay adjustment
of $250 for every year of service over 11 years. That adjustment would not be
added to base pay.
Fully implementing all three phases exceeds the current year's budgeted amount
by $13,976.
I have also prepared an estimate of the sustaining fiscal effect of the new pay
ranges. It would be expected that an overhaul of our pay philosophy and ranges
would have a significant fiscal impact. Keep in mind that the new system is
performance driven so raises are no longer a given, they must be earned through
performance and a progression pay system.
Pay for Performance (P4P)
The new pay plan will incentivize performance. A scale is needed to determine
how employees' pay will progress through the ranges based on performance
scores. The Salary Survey Committee reviewed three P4P progression scale
options. An employee survey of the three options was also conducted. Thirty-
three employees responded. The committee agreed with the employee survey
results and the final recommendation is attached (attachment 6).
A proposed P4P — Compensation Management Policy Plan is also attached
(attachment ). This was also reviewed and accepted by the Salary Survey
Committee.
Agenda
Page 26 of 167
Attachment 1
City of Moab
Proposal For A
Job Classification
Compensation Study
March 16, 2016
Prepared By
Personnel'
Systems &
Services
1325 W. Bluemont Dr.
Salt Lake City, UT 84123
801-269-8977
personnelsystems@comcast.net
Agenda
Page 27 of 167
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
PROJECT PHILOSOPHY 1
SERVICE AREAS 2
JOB EVALUATION & CLASSIFICATION 2
LABOR MARKET ANALYSIS 2
COMPENSATION POLICIES & PROCEDURES 2
BASIS OF SOUND PAY PROGRAMS 3
SCOPE OF WORK- JOB ANALYSIS & CLASSIFICATION STUDY 4
JOB EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION 4
SCOPE OF WORK- MARKET COMPENSATION STUDY 4
LABOR MARKET DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS 4
SAMPLE ANALYTICAL CHARTS 5
"NO MORE PAY GRADES" ALTERNATIVE 6
EMPLOYER PROVIDED BENEFITS 6
SALARY STRUCTURE REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS 7
DELIVERABLE PRODUCT & MATERIALS 7
TIME REQUIREMENTS 7
PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS PROFILE 9
REFERENCES 10
PREVIOUS ENAGEMENTS 11
Agenda
Page 28 of 167
INTRODUCTION
The development of a sound personnel management system begins with an organizational statement addressing the
objectives of management related to achieving a predetermined employer status and labor market posture. Underlying
the objectives is the organization's attitude or philosophy about work and workers. With this in mind the consultant
assumes (1) that the City of Moab desires to achieve a reasonable level of competitiveness and maintain current
standards in providing quality services by attracting and retaining the most qualified employees and (2) in order to avoid
becoming a training ground for other employers, the city views it desirable to provide career development opportunities
where ever possible, competitive compensation and commit other resources necessary to enhance the attractiveness of
the city as an employer.
PROJECT PHILOSOPHY
Personnel Systems & Services subscribes to and promotes equal pay for equal work, non-discrimination in employment
and fair and good faith dealing in all employee -employer relationships. Management has the right to expect a fair day's
labor for the daily wage provided. Employees have the right to expect a fair day's pay for the labor given. The
appropriateness of the pay provided is a function of the market place, the organizations internal equity system, which
establishes the value of the job to a specific employer, and the perceived value of the individual based upon job
performance, which includes loyalty, dependability and competence.
The employee's perception of equity and consistency in pay practices may not result in greater productivity and efficiency
while the perception of inequity and inconsistency will most always produce discontent.
1
Agenda
Page 29 of 167
SERVICE AREAS
JOB DESCRIPTION UPDATE & DEVELOPMENT -- TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY
The process of collecting facts about jobs sufficient to update job descriptions and specifications is the preliminary
requirement necessary to complete job evaluation and classification, the application of your internal equity instrument.
The description details what is involved in the job that includes job title, general purpose statements, and essential
functions. The specifications for the job refer to those statements that describe personal characteristics, minimum
qualifications, knowledge, skills, and abilities, or special qualifications that must be met in order for a job applicant to be
considered eligible for the position. Completed documents are ADA compliant with regard to essential functions of each
individual position.
JOB EVALUATION & CLASSIFICATION
The evaluation of the job comes through the establishment of measurement criteria against which all jobs are compared in
order to determine relative organizational value. The instrument is typically a point system, a factoring method, job
ranking, or a combination. Measurement criteria are aspects of the job such as job knowledge, minimum qualifications,
and difficulty of work, accountability, responsibility, supervision, job controls, and work environment. The objective of this
phase of the project is to determine and establish the internal equity program that is ultimately attached to market data to
create a formal pay plan. This process will assist the city to identify its own "worth of work" values resulting in a "site
validated" internal equity methodology.
LABOR MARKET ANALYSIS
A review of the labor market, the economic area in which you wish to compete, is essential to the overall success of the
pay plan. The objective of the analysis is to achieve external competitiveness. This phase involves the completion of a
survey of employer wages and benefits for city benchmark positions. Through the use of statistical measures and
evaluation techniques it is possible to determine your competitive position in the chosen market place including public
and/or private employers, and then establish a specific posture regarding the most realistic market objectives in terms of
pay ranges and methods of pay progression. Where does the City want to posture itself in the market place? As a
trendsetter? A leading edge competitor? At market parity? Or, as reasonably comparable?
COMPENSATION POLICIES & PROCEDURES
Provided without cost will be a model policy for compensation administration. A comprehensive set of policies and
procedures could be included in the study if of interest by the city for which a separate cost would need to be determined.
2
Agenda
Page 30 of 167
BASIS OF SOUND PAY PROGRAMS
As the city seeks to establish and maintain an effective compensation program it is recommended that consideration be
given to some or all of the following:
1. Size and type of business: The ability to pay certain rates, based upon revenues and financial resources.
2. Organizational Philosophy: The willingness to pay certain rates and attitudes about ranking among other
employers within a selected labor market.
3. Nature and Diversity of Work: The degree of specialization, work variety, and technology (an element of the job
classification methodology).
4. Regional Economics: The prevailing rates of pay and the rates of inflation.
5. Availability of Labor Supply: The competition for certain types of jobs resulting from an abundance or shortage of
certain skills and abilities within the labor market.
6. Value of Work Contribution: The worth of a particular job to the organization (the overall value determined
through classification methodology).
7. Pay Supplements: The total compensation comparability afforded through various incentives and discretionary
benefits.
8. Reputation of the Organization: The competitiveness of pay and social recognition as high- or low -paying.
9. Pay Progression Policy:
➢ The learning curve impact associated with certain types of jobs.
➢ Pay range uniformity vs. diversity (pay schedule design).
➢ Length of Service.
➢ Performance based increases.
➢ Pay for knowledge or level of competency.
➢ The use of "control rates" within the pay ranges.
10. Bonus and Incentive Plans:
➢ The use of "non-scheduled" recognitions.
➢ The use of non -monetary rewards.
11. Ownership Protection: involves realistic consideration of resource limitations. The cost of administration should
constantly be balanced against achieving the other objectives of the pay plan and overall personnel program.
3
Agenda
Page 31 of 167
SCOPE OF WORK
JOB ANALYSIS & CLASSIFICATION STUDY
QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTRATION
Step #1: The consultant will provide to MANAGEMENT/HR staff the data collection instruments (along with
instructions for completion) for distribution to fulltime employees. These instruments will include a "Job
Values" survey. Target dates for completion will be attached in a memo regarding the project when
delivered to employees via PDF and email.
Step #2: MANAGEMENT/HR staff to review a "Job Values Survey" instrument provided by the consultant to
determine that the survey content addresses all the "worth of work" values of interest to the city. This
process results in the delivery of a "site validated" job evaluation (point factor) instrument consistent
with those criteria set forth in the Fair Labor Standards Act as the legitimate basis to "discriminate" or
differentiate the pay between jobs.
Step #3: MANAGEMENT/HR distributes to all employees the survey along with instructions for completion and a
targeted completion date. Upon completion, the employee will return the form automatically by clicking
a "submit" button at the bottom of the survey form.
Step #4: MANAGEMENT/HR staff delivers electronic copies of existing/current job descriptions to the consultant.
Step #5: MANAGEMENT/HR staff to email the consultant an Excel file containing the fulltime employee census
identifying employee first name, last name, department, job title, pay grade/band, pay range minimum
and maximum and current actual pay.
JOB EVALUATION & CLASSIFICATION
Based upon the results of the "Job Values" survey the consultant will develop and deliver an updated and customized job
evaluation instrument reflecting the employee "worth of work" priorities. The consultant will then perform the initial point
factor evaluation of each job based upon the provided job description and prepare recommendations for job ranges or pay
grades. The instrument will compare each job against measures such as responsibility, difficulty of work, job knowledge
and work environment, etc. The scientific approach used in the construction of the factor tool is based upon Weber's
"Law of Just -Noticeable -Difference."
Step #6: Consultant develops and recommends point factor evaluation instrument and pay grade options with
consideration being given to various pay plan designs, with or without pay grades.
Step #7: The consultant applies the point valuation instrument to each job and creates the baseline for
establishing internal equity and job valuation consistency.
Step #8: MANAGEMENT/HR Officer and assigned staff in cooperation with the consultant "fine-tunes" the
assignment of points to each job.
SCOPE OF WORK
MARKET COMPENSATION STUDY
MARKET DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS
Step #9: To the extent possible, the consultant will utilize the Technology Net, web -based resource to expedite
the conducting of the Market Compensation Study. Additionally, complementary market data will be
added to the data obtained through direct solicitation of the targeted survey participants in the
Blanding market area as defined by management.
4
Agenda
Page 32 of 167
Step #10: Labor Market Analysis: The consultant will conduct a survey of base wages within a selected labor
market for a variety of selected benchmark positions. The survey participants will be chosen by city
management and MANAGEMENT/HR staff and represent various public and private entities with
whom the city desires to be competitive. It is recommended that this sample remain fairly stable over
the years in order to assure consistency in market evaluation.
It is also recommended that the survey participants represent the "trend setters", thus enabling the
city to ascertain the leadership position of the market. By knowing what market leaders are doing the
city can determine what kind of pay policy and posture they want to maintain in relationship with the
selected market. Statistical analysis and charts will be used to describe the survey results.
Step #11: Develop and deliver regression analysis graphic illustrations of the city's comparative position with the
defined market area and survey participants.
Sample Analytical Chart #1
Pay
Grade
Survey
Minimum
Heber $
Minimum Difference
%
Difference
10
$25,249
$27,814
$2,566
9.2%
11
$27,002
$29,551
$2,549
8.6%
12
$28,877
$31,396
$2,518
8.0%
13
$30,883
$33,355
$2,473
7.4%
14
$33,028
$35,438
$2,410
6.8%
15
$35,321
$37,650
$2,329
6.2%
16
$37,774
$40,000
$2,226
5.6%
17
$40,398
$42,498
$2,100
4.9%
18
$43,203
$45,151
$1,947
4.3%
19
$46,204
$47,969
$1,766
3.7%
20
$49,412
$50,964
$1,551
3.0%
21
$52,844
$54,145
$1,301
2.4%
$105,000
$90,000
$75,000
T 560,000
a
a $45,000
$30,000
$15,000
$o a
0
Minimum Rate Comparison
45urvey Minimum
-L- Heber Minimum
5
10
15
Pay Grade
20
25
30
J
5
Agenda
Page 33 of 167
Sample Analytical Chart #2
Pay
Grade
Survey
Minimum
Survey
Midpoint
Survey
Maximum
Heber
Actual
1
$13,797
$16,417
$19,018
$15,614
2
$14,756
$17,566
$20,357
$16,827
3
$15,780
$18,796
$21,790
$18,135
4
$16,876
$20,112
$23,324
$19,544
5
$18,048
$21,520
$24,966
$21,062
6
$19,302
$23,027
$26,724
$22,699
7
$20,642
$24,639
$28,605
$24,463
8
$22,076
$26,364
$30,619
$26,364
9
$23,609
$28,209
$32,774
$28,412
10
$25,249
$30,184
$35,082
$30,620
11
$27,002
$32,298
$37,552
$32,999
12
$28,877
$34,559
$40,195
$35,563
13
$30,883
$36,978
$43,025
$38,326
14
$33,028
$39,567
$46,054
$41,304
15
$35,321
$42,338
$49,297
$44,513
16
$37,774
$45,302
$52,767
$47,972
17
$40,398
$48,473
$56,482
$51,699
18
$43,203
$51,867
$60,459
$55,716
19
$46,204
$55,498
$64,715
$60,046
$140,000 Survey Range vs. City Average Pay
$120,000
$100,000
e
a $80,000
A
c
c
d
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
50
a
s
10
15
Pay Grade
Survey Minimum
- s-Survey Midpoint
- Survey Maximum
Heber Actual
20
25
1
30
1
Alternative: No More Pa Grade : Now developed and available is an approach to compensation analysis that
eliminates the use of pay grades but still retains the integrity of an internal equity maintenance methodology. Over the
years there have always been complaints about pay grade structures that become manipulated. While it is almost
impossible to eliminate all manipulation, this new approach can significantly minimize and may eventually eliminate such
fairness distortions. Based upon an internal equity valuation each job can have an individualized market based pay
range. The slightest variations between the worth of jobs based upon your entity's worth -of -work values can now be
recognized resulting in base pay management that is not cumbersomely attached to a confining "pay plan".
This approach can also overcome the frustrations of "Broad Banding" and eliminate the challenges of associating
non-benchmarked jobs to the benchmark anchor. Here too, every job can be uniquely assigned a market derived pay
rate.
EMPLOYER PROVIDED BENEFITS
In identifying the city's competitive posture with the labor market, the consultant will develop a total compensation picture.
There are three basic approaches to comparing benefits: (1) Benefit plan provision method, (2) Employer cost method,
and (3) standard cost method or the "level of benefit approach". All three methods have strengths and weakness.
Method #2 is the approach utilized by U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze trends in
employer benefits. The question that will be addressed is: "How does the amount of money the city is spending per
employee (for employer paid benefits) compare to the amount of money competitors are spending on their employees"
(discretionary and mandatory benefits)?
Step #12: The consultant will solicit Total Compensation data, the total value of employer paid benefits. The
Total Compensation Value (TCV) will be calculated for each position and included in the final market
analysis.
6
Agenda
Page 34 of 167
SALARY STRUCTURE REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS
Step #13: The Consultant and MANAGEMENT/HR Staff will finalize the salary structure to ensure conformity
with management philosophy for pay progression methodology and competitive positioning within the
defined market. After identifying market relationships the City will select a level of competitiveness to
be achieved in the design of the new pay plan or "plans" with consideration being given to targeted
percentiles in the data's prevailing rates. The learning curve philosophy may also be reflected in the
development of ranges for various job classifications. Under the "No More Pay Grade" alternative,
each individual job classification/description will potentially have an independent and separate pay
range based upon market.
Step #14: The Consultant will complete the full integration of the results of the classification and job evaluation
phase of the study with the market compensation study.
Step #15: The Consultant will Identify and calculate a least cost implementation plan and identify the placement
of each employee in relation to their job's revised pay grade/range and classification. As needed, the
consultant will create "phase -in" options based upon calculated economic impact.
Step #16: Based upon the preferred option for the number of pay grades the consultant will prepare and deliver
recommendations for salary schedule restructuring. If the "No Pay Grade" option is of interest the
results can be reviewed according to individual jobs and job families.
DELIVERABLE PRODUCT AND MATERIALS
Upon conclusion of the project the consultant will provide the City electronic copies of all documents, including job
descriptions, pay plans, sample compensation policy and related materials according to this proposal. Hard copy option is
available at a cost of $100 per binder, each ring binder containing all project documents and personnel materials. The
binders will be vinyl and include City name on the front, with the words "Human Resource Manual" on the spine and
across the front. A six bank set of Mylar covered tabs will be inside each binder identifying manual sections labeled:
Organization Charts, Policies and Procedures, Position Descriptions, Classification and Job Analysis, Salary Information,
and Sample Personnel Forms.
TIME REQUIREMENTS
Wage & Salary Market Analysis Study
Job Value Survey**
Job Valuation Instrument Development
Point Factoring & Position Classification
Labor Market Analysis **
Total Compensation Data Collection
Salary Schedule Pay Plan Development
Completed Project/ Least Cost Implementati
1st Month
2nd Month
3rd Month
4th Month
4111—dr
sir
is-
�r
0 n
�r
is—
IliV INV
Approx.
** It is the consultant's experience that slowing in the time line can occur at these phases of the study. Generally,
supervisors need to be insistent regarding employees completing and returning Values Survey within the allocated time
period. Should such hurdles develop in the study, the target completion date could be over run. Commitment from all
levels of management to promote the projects successful completion will be a key element.
0= Deliverable
7
Agenda
Page 35 of 167
MIKE SWALLOW
PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS PROFILE
WORK EXPERIENCE
(1976-2016)
Technology Net, Inc.; Partner and co -developer of the TechNet online Compensation Survey System. 900 Subscribers in
Utah, Idaho, New Mexico, Wyoming, Colorado, Mid -American Regional Council (Kansas & Missouri), Virginia and
Maryland. Established 2002.
Personnel Systems & Services. Currently providing technical assistance consulting services in human resource
management systems consisting of: job analysis and classification, labor market compensation analysis and pay plan
development, policy and procedure development, grievance management and resolution, performance management,
recruitment and selection, training and general HR management programs. Company established in 1988.
Bureau Manager- Local Government MANAGEMENT/HR Consultant, Bureau of Consulting Services, Department of
Human Resource Management, State of Utah. Develop, market, coordinate and deliver technical assistance services to
Utah cities and counties in human resource management, supervisory training, organizational development, employee
assistance programs, employee relations, fair employment programs, recruitment and selection, job classification, and
wage and benefit analysis. Direct and coordinated state-wide and interstate salary and benefit surveys and analysis.
Contract Consultant, Emery County, Price City, Tooele City, Iron City, Tooele City and Carbon County Utah. In
conjunction with State of Utah consulting duties, and under special contract, acted as advisor and resource to the City.
Provided consultation related to policies, procedures, classification, compensation, recruitment, selection, discipline,
termination and employee relations.
Self Employed, Benefits Broker & Personnel Consultant. Marketing and sales of individual and group benefits
utilizing medical reimbursement plans, salary continuation plans, business continuation programs, stock redemption plans
and 401(k) salary reduction plans. Performed private consulting to professionals and local governments. Developed
business plans or proformas with income projections, cash flow analysis, balance sheets and break even analysis.
Worked as an associate to Ricketts and Associates -Risk Management/Vierra-CPA firm. Licensed to sell life, health and
disability insurance.
Idaho Association of Counties, Boise, Idaho. Develop, market, coordinate and deliver technical assistance services to
Idaho cities and counties in human resource management, supervisory training, organizational development, employee
assistance programs, employee relations, fair employment programs, recruitment and selection, job classification, and
wage and benefit analysis.
Current Retainers: North Davis County Sewer District, UT; Washington City, UT
Current Projects: North Central Regional Transportation District, NM; Idaho Falls, ID; Ephraim City, UT; Canyon
County, ID; Ouray, CO; Ridgway, CO; Taos Ski Valley, NM; Lehi, UT; Saratoga Springs, UT; Nampa, ID; Canyon County
Paramedics, ID.
Annual Projects Conducted via Technology Net: Wasatch Compensation Group annual salary and benefit survey
(Salt Lake City, West Valley, Murray, Sandy, Provo, Orem, Ogden, Layton, Park City, West Jordan, St. George, and
South Salt Lake). Colorado Municipal League, Virginia Institute of Government/University of Virginia, Maryland Municipal
League.
8
Agenda
Page 36 of 167
REFERENCES
Mr. Craig Whitehead, City Manager, 51 East Main Street, American Fork, UT 84003, 801-763-3000, cwhitehead@afcity.net
Mr. Rick Holman, City Manager, Cedar City, UT, 435 586-2953; hrick@cedarcity.orq
Mr. Jamie Davidson, City Manager, Orem, UT, 801-229-7038, jpdavidson@orem.org
Mr. Brenn Bybee, Assistant City Manager, Orem, UT, 801-669-7292, bdbybee@orem.org
Ms. Pam Springs, HR Director, Lafayette, CO, 303-665-5588, pamsp@cityoflafayette.com
Mr. Roger Carter, City Manager, 111 North 100 East, Washington City, UT, 435-656-6300, rcarter@washingtoncity.org
Mr. David Kitchen, Human Resource Director, Lehi City, 801-768-7100, dkitchen(a�Lehi-ut.gov
Ms. Ruth Holyoak, HR Officer, 111 North 100 East, Washington City, UT, 435-656-6315
Mr. William Fulginiti, Executive Director, New Mexico Municipal League, 505-982-5573
Mr. Dan Byron, Chief Deputy County Clerk, Bonneville City, Idaho Falls, ID; 605 N Capital Ave, (208) 529-1350
Ms. Delilah Walsh, County Manager, Socorro County, Socorro, NM, 575-835-0589, dwalsh@co.socorro.nm.us
Mr. Roger Makin, Member Services Consultant, New Mexico Municipal League, 1-800-432-2036, rmakin@nmml.org
Ms. Melanie Marsh, Human Resources Director, City of Idaho Falls, Idaho Falls, ID; 208-612-8248;
mmarsh(@..idahofallsidaho.gov
Mr. Dan Tarwater, HR Director, Las Vegas, NV, (702) 229-6011, dtarwater@lasvegasnevada.gov
Ms. Sue Brown, Compensation Administrator, Las Vegas, NV, (702) 229-6011, sbrown@LasVegasNevada.GOV
Ms. Pam Springs, HR Director, Lafayette, CO, 303-665-5588, pamsp@cityoflafayette.com
Ms. April Hessman, City Clerk, Pagosa Springs, 970-264-4151, ahessman@pagosasprings.co.gov
Others Upon Request
9
Agenda
Page 37 of 167
PREVIOUS ENGAGEMENTS
Classification, Compensation, Supervisor Training, Performance Management
UTAH
American Fork, UT
Bluffdale City
Bountiful Water Subconservancy District
Box Elder City
Brian Head Town
Brigham City
Cache City School District
Canyonlands Natural History Association
Carbon City Housing Authority
Cedar City
Centerfield
Central Weber Sewer Improvement District
Clearfield City
Davis Applied Technology Center
Davis City
Davis City School District
Draper City
Eagle Mountain, UT
East Carbon City
Emery City
Emery City School District
Ephraim City
Five City Association of Governments
Garfield City
Grand City
Heber City
Heber Light & Power
Heber Valley Railroad
Helper City
Holladay City
Hurricane City
Iron County
Kearns Improvement District
LaVerkin City
Layton City
Lehi City
Mapleton City
Midvale City
Morgan City
Mountainland Association of Governments
Murray School District
Neways International
North Davis City Sewer District
North Salt Lake City, UT
Park City School District
Phonex Corporation
Pleasant Grove City
Price City
Provo City
Riverdale City
Salt Lake City Service Area #1
San Juan School District
Santaquin City
Sevier Applied Technology Center
Six City Commissioners Organization
Snyderville Recreation District
South Davis City Fire Department
South Jordan City
South Salt Lake City
Southeastern Utah Association of Governments
Spanish Fork City
Springville City
State Board of Education (Utah)
State Court Administrator, Office of
Summit County
Syracuse City
Taylorsville
Timpanogos Special Service District
Tooele County
Tooele City
Uintah Basin Applied Technology Center
Uintah School District
Utah County
Utah Risk Management Mutual Association
Wasatch County
Wasatch Front Regional Council
Washington County
Washington City
Washington Terrace
Wellington City
West Jordan
Woods Cross
Zion Natural History Association
IDAHO
Coeur d'Alene City
Idaho Falls City
Benewah County
Blaine County
Bonner County
Bonneville County
Boundary County
Canyon County
Caribou County
Custer County
Gooding County
Idaho County
Kootenai County
Lemhi County
Madison County
Minidoka County
Owyhee County
Power County
Valley County
10
Page 38 of 167
Agenda
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico Municipal League
New Mexico Finance Authority
Albuquerque
Ruidoso
Santa Fe
North Central Regional Transit District
Carlsbad
Town of Taos
Clovis
Village of Taos Ski Valley
Socorro County
WYOMING/COLORADO/ALASKA
Hoonah, AK
Cody, WY
Park County, WY
Powell, WY
Lander, WY
Central Wyoming College
Wheatland, WY
Torrington, WY
Wyoming Municipal Power Agency, WY
Lafayette, CO
Walsenburg, CO
Logan City, CO
Georgetown, CO
Other: National District Attorney Association, Washington DC/Arlington VA
President of
general partner
assistance primarily
management
procedure development,
selection and
based in Utah,
Intergovernmental
Academic credentials
Brigham Young
David has provided
years. Mr. Colvin
city manager
improvement
resource systems,
legislature, Mr.
plans and providing
also managed
and management
human resource
in Communications
University.
Gaylyn boasts
complimented
classification
consulting engagements
Department's
Waste & Recycling
years and as
in Personnel &
PROJECT TEAM -KEY STAFF
Mike Swallow
Personnel Systems & Services, Inc.; a human resource consulting company established in 1988 and a
of Technology Net, Inc., established in 2001. For over 30 years Mike has been providing technical
to local government entities either as a staff consultant or independent consultant in various HR
areas, including job analysis and classification, labor market analysis and pay plan development, policy and
grievance management and resolution, performance management & evaluation, recruitment and
supervisor training. Having been engaged by over 100 entities, Personnel Systems & Services has clients
New Mexico, Idaho, Wyoming, New Jersey and Alaska. Previous employers include the Utah
Personnel Agency, Idaho Association of Counties, State of Utah- DHRM, and Summit County.
include a master's degree in public administration and a bachelor's degree in psychology from
University.
David R. Colvin
management and consulting services to state and local governments, and education for more than 25
has a dozen years of experience in city government management in three states, including 9 years as a
or administrator. During his tenure as a city manager/administrator, he managed many large-scale capital
projects, developed and implemented master plans, city-wide performance reporting systems, human
and performance based budgets. As a strategic planner, fiscal and management analyst for a state
Colvin has 9 years' experience managing and facilitating the development of several state-wide strategic
consulting services in developing a state-wide performance measurement system. Mr. Colvin has
and provided training for a University's state and local government managers/elected officials leadership
development program, and provided consulting services to many local governments in developing
systems and implementing other organizational development efforts. Mr. Colvin has a Bachelor's degree
and Organizational Behavior, and a Master of Public Administration degree, from Brigham Young
Gaylyn Larsen, SPHR
over 21 years of experience in local government human resource management, which experience is
by three years of full time consulting. Her consulting engagements involved the development of job
and compensation systems, and she has been a member of several job audit teams in connection with
entered into by Personnel Systems & Services. Gaylyn is served as the Salt Lake County Sheriff
Human Resource Director for several years and is currently Human Resource Director for Wasatch Front
District. Previously, she served as Human Resource Director for the City of St. George for nearly 8
a Human Resource Analyst for the Utah State Tax Commission. Her academic credentials include a degree
Industrial Relations with a minor in Economics.
11
Page 39 of 167
Agenda
Jeff Monson
Jeff has attained degrees in Business Management, Business Administration, and a Master's degree in Organizational
Management. He has 15 years of training, program development, and human resource experience. Jeff gained much of
his experience while working at Intermountain Health Care. During that time, he worked with a variety of employee and
patient groups and committees and helped develop and implement effective communication techniques and behavioral
modification programs. He also gained a wide range of experience from working with over 300 small- and medium-sized
organizations, assisting them with human resource, benefit, and safety issues. Additionally, he has helped companies
develop the necessary policies and procedures to become more effective and profitable. Various projects involved the
resolution of issues between employers and employees regarding compliance issues, safety laws, and regulations. He
was elected and serves as a member of the Board of Trustees for Kearns Oquirrh Park Fitness Center. Currently Jeff is
the Human Resource Director for the Valley Emergency Communications Center, Salt Lake County.
Richard T. Morley
Richard (Ric) holds a bachelor's degree in business administration and is a human resource professional with 20+ years
of combined experience in human resource management, business, business development, purchasing, accounting,
computers, and retail business management. With his experience crossing several disciplines, he brings multiple business
talents to our consulting team. Since 1991 he has been involved in HR operations. This included the development of
seminars in time management (Simple Time Management); serving as Director of Operations for a company that
achieved over 50 million a year in sales (where he also developed the basis for the future HRIS system); serving as a
team member providing HR consulting to local governments; and serving as Director of Human Resources for a small
company where he was later promoted to Executive Vice President. Here he also developed an internet-based HRIS
system that works with almost all payroll and human resource programs. Most recently, Ric assisted in forming a human
resource company named HR Group Central whose focus is to provide customized HR technical assistance to small and
large companies where he is currently serving as the COO. Ric is a member of the SHRM and has been involved with
various chamber organizations.
Judy Thimakis
Judy has a combined 25 years of human resource experience in private industry, higher education and local government
public administration. As a PhD, Judy currently occupies a faculty position at the University of Phoenix, teaching in the
master's and undergraduate programs. In a fulltime capacity, Judy has worked for Salt Lake County as a Senior HR
Analyst in the Human Resources Department. She is experienced in managing benefits, compensation, recruitment,
employee relations, safety, training, testing, law enforcement merit systems, and some information systems.
Academically, Judy carries a Bachelor's Degree in Human Resources and a Master's Degree in Public Administration.
She owns a Doctorate of Management where her dissertation subject was Gender and Leadership, a Comparative Study.
She is trained in dispute resolution and is a Legislative Advocate, assisting with lobbying efforts for University of Utah.
Judy has been active professionally serving on boards in the human resources area including President, Vice President,
and a board member for the Intermountain Compensation and Benefit Association (ICBA) and the International Public
Management Association -Human Resources (IPMA-HR).
Kenneth G. Topham Jr., CEBS CPM
Kenneth earned a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Southern Utah State County (now Southern Utah
University) and an MBA from the University of Utah. He has professional designations as a Certified Employee Benefit
Specialist (CEBS) from the Wharton School and the International Foundation of Employee Benefits Plans; and as a
Certified Public Manager (CPM) from the University of Utah and the State of Utah. He is a past member and chairman of
the Salt Lake Area Compensation and Benefits Group and previous member of the International Foundation of Employee
Benefits Plans and of the International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists. He was employed with the State
of Utah for 30 years, with nearly 28 years of experience in the human resource management field. He has filled positions
as Management Analyst in the Department of Transportation, Human Resource Director in the State Tax Commission,
State Compensation Manager, State Benefits Manager, and HR Functional Manager during the State's development and
implementation of a client/server Human Resource Management Information System. He was instrumental in developing
and implementing the State's flexible benefits program, employee benefits profiles, annual benefits fairs, a health
awareness training program, and the State's client/server human resource management information system. His last
assignment with the DHRM was as the HR Special Projects Manager with assignment specifically in the area of local
government services. Ken is also a Technology Net, Inc. general partner.
12
Agenda
Page 40 of 167
Attachment 2
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION
Employee name and title
[Employee name], [Title]
Evaluation for the period:
[Start date] — [End date]
Supervisor name and title
[Supervisor name], [Title]
Department:
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES DURING THIS EVALUATION PERIOD
• [Goals and objectives]
• [Goals and objectives]
• [Goals and objectives]
ACHIEVEMENTS, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES (completed by employee)
• [Achievements, accomplishments, and responsibilities]
• [Achievements, accomplishments, and responsibilities]
• [Achievements, accomplishments, and responsibilities]
RATING SCALE
1 2 3 4 5
• 1 = Does not meet performance expectations
• 2 = Partially meets performance expectations
• 3 = Meets performance expectations
• 4 = Meets and often exceeds performance expectations
• 5 = Meets and consistently exceeds performance expectations
CUSTOMER SERVICE (completed by supervisor)
1 2 3 4 5 15%
• Expectation of performance
• Provide specific examples of how Employee has provided customer service during the evaluation year.
• Identify areas in which the employee excels in customer service.
• Identify areas of customer service in which the employee could improve or modify actions.
RELIABILITY/ATTENDANCE (completed by supervisor) 1 2 3 4 5 10%
• Expectation of performance
• Provide specific examples of Employee's reliability during the evaluation year.
• Identify areas in which the employee excels in reliability or attendance.
• Identify areas of reliability in which the employee could improve or modify actions.
PRODUCTIVITY/SELF MOTIVATION (completed by supervisor) 1 2 3 4 5 20%
• Expectation of performance
• Provide specific examples of Employee's productivity and self motivation during the evaluation year.
• Identify areas in which the employee excels in productivity and self motivation.
• Identify areas of productivity and self motivation in which the employee could improve or modify actions.
TECHNICAL SKILLS (completed by supervisor) 1 2 3 4 5 15%
• Expectation of performance
—cific examples of Employee's technical skills during the evaluation year.
Agenda
Page 41 of 167
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION
• Identify areas in which the employee excels with their technical skills.
• Identify areas technical skills in which the employee could improve.
COOPERATION/TEAMWORK (completed by supervisor) 1 2 3 4 5 15%
• Expectation of performance
• Provide specific examples of Employee's cooperation and teamwork during the evaluation year.
• Identify areas in which the employee excels in cooperation and teamwork.
• Identify areas of teamwork and cooperation in which the employee could improve or modify actions.
SAFETY (completed by supervisor) 1 2 3 4 5 2%
• Expectation of performance
• Provide specific safety examples during the evaluation year.
• Identify areas in which the employee excels in safety.
• Identify areas of safety in which the employee could improve or modify actions.
JUDGEMENT (completed by supervisor)
1 2 3 4 5 10%
• Expectation of performance
• Provide specific examples of Employee's judgement during the evaluation year.
• Identify areas in which the employee has demonstrated excellent judgement.
• Identify areas or examples of which the employee could improve or modify judgement.
SUPERVISION (completed by supervisor)
1 2 3 4 5 13%
• Expectation of performance
• Provide specific examples of Employee's supervision during the evaluation year.
• Identify areas in which the employee excels in supervision.
• Identify areas of supervision in which the employee could improve or modify actions.
STRENGTHS AND AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT
• [Strengths and areas for development]
• [Strengths and areas for development]
• [Strengths and areas for development]
CAREER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
• [Career development plan]
• [Career development plan]
• [Career development plan]
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR NEXT EVALUATION PERIOD
• [Goals and objectives]
• [Goals and objectives]
Agenda
] Page 2 of 3
Page 42 of 167
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION
• [Goals and objectives]
EMPLOYEE COMMENTS
• [Goals and objectives]
• [Goals and objectives]
•
OVERALL EVALUATION RECOMMENDATION CUMULATIVE SCORE
• Employee's cumulative score indicated eligibility for pay increase
• 1— Grounds for discipline/termination
• 2 — Performance plan — possibly disciplinary action
• 3 — Meeting performance expectations — eligible for COLA and Merit
• 4 — Excelling at performance expectations — eligible for COLA, Merit, and 1.5% Performance Bonus
• 5 — Exceeding Job Requirements AND Excelling in areas beyond — eligible for COLA, Merit and 3% Performance Bonus
EMPLOYEE SIGNATURESUPERVISOR SIGNATURE
Signature
Signature
Name
[Employee name]
Name
[Supervisor name]
Date
[End date]
Date
[End date]
Agenda
] Page 3 of 3
Page 43 of 167
Attachment 3
ORDINANCE NO.2016-14
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF MOAB PAY PLAN SCHEDULE
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
WHEREAS, the Moab City Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual allows that pay
ranges may be adjusted periodically for comparable work in other municipalities; and
WHEREAS, the Moab City Personnel, Policies and Procedures Manual calls for annual
surveys of salaries; and
WHEREAS, the City has conducted a comprehensive salary survey through the
utilization of Personnel Systems Inc. and has presented the survey results to the
Governing Body; and
WHEREAS, the proposed "City of Moab 2016 Proposed Pay Plan" is attached to this
resolution as Attachment A, respectively; and
WHEREAS, Moab Municipal Code Section 2.44.010 states that all salaries of the
elective and appointive officers of the City and the other employees of the City shall be
fixed by motion or resolution of the City Council as in accordance with existing law.
NOW, THEREFORE, WE, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MOAB
RESOLVE TO ADOPT The City of Moab 2016 Proposed Pay Plan (Attachment A) as
referred herein effective January 1, 2017.
DATED this 22nd day of November 2016.
ATTEST:
Rachel E. Stenta
City Recorder
SIGNED:
David L. Sakrison
Mayor
Agenda
rdinance #2016-14 November 22, 2016
Page 44 of 167
Ordinance 42016-14
Attachment A
JOB TITLE
ADMIN ASSISTANT - AQUATIC
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT I
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT II
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT II
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER
ANIMAL CONTROL SUPERVISOR
ANIMAL SHELTER MANAGER
AQUATIC CENTER MANAGER
AQUATIC MANAGER
ARTS/SPECIAL EVENTS MANAGER
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/RECORDER
ASSISTANT PLANNER
ASSISTANT TO CITY ENGINEER
CITY ENGINEER
CITY MANAGER
CITY PLANNER
CITY TREASURER
CIVIL ENGINEER SENIOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR
DEPUTY RECORDER
DEPUTY RECORDER II/HR
DEPUTY TREASURER
FILM COMMISSION COORDINATOR
LIEUTENANT
LIFEGUARD
PARKS SERVICE WORKER I
PARKS SERVICE WORKER II
PARKS SERVICE WORKER III
PARKS SUPERINTENDENT
PARKS,RECREATION & TRAILS ASSISTANT
PARKS/RECREATION/TRAILS DIRECTOR
POLICE CHIEF
POLICE OFFICER I
POLICE OFFICER II
POLICE OFFICER II/DRUG ENFORCEMENT
POLICE OFFICER III
POLICE OFFICER III/DRUG ENFORCEMENT
PUBLIC FACILITIES SUPERINTENDENT
PUBLIC FACILITIES SERVICE WORKER I/CUSTODIAN
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
RECORDER ASSISTANT
SERGEANT
SEWER DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
SPORTS/RECREATION ASSISTANT
SPORTS/RECREATION MANAGER
STREETS SERVICE WORKER I
STREETS SERVICE WORKER II/CDL
STREETS SERVICE WORKER II/MECHANIC
STREETS SERVICE WORKER III/CDL
STREETS SERVICE WORKER III/MECHANIC
STREETS SUPERINTENDENT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR/SUPERINTENDENT
WATER DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER I
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER I/METER READER
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER II/CDL
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER II/WWTP
WATER/SEWER SERVICE WORKER III
Hourly Pay Rates
Minimum
$15.91
$17.49
$19.27
$17.58
$19.27
$16.49
$20.12
$20.90
$25.62
$21.36
$21.78
$43.68
$20.77
$19.69
$35.99
$55.12
$28.09
$22.22
$27.42
$33.05
$20.61
$17.75
$28.05
$18.55
$23.63
$28.65
$16.48
$16.70
$17.18
$17.89
$24.88
$16.72
$32.97
$36.38
$19.85
$20.44
$20.44
$21.29
$21.29
$24.00
$15.61
$36.32
$17.78
$24.50
$25.96
$16.95
$22.65
$16.97
$17.50
$18.46
$19.10
$21.51
$25.27
$27.06
$26.23
$17.13
$17.07
$17.67
$18.59
$18.95
Pay Range
Midpoint
$19.89
$21.86
$24.09
$21.98
$24.09
$20.61
$25.14
$26.13
$32.02
$26.70
$27.23
$54.60
$25.97
$24.61
$44.99
$68.90
$35.11
$27.78
$34.27
$41.31
$25.76
$22.18
$35.07
$23.19
$29.54
$35.82
$20.61
$20.87
$21.47
$22.36
$31.10
$20.91
$41.21
$45.47
$24.82
$25.55
$25.55
$26.62
$26.62
$30.00
$19.51
$45.40
$22.23
$30.63
$32.45
$21.18
$28.31
$21.21
$21.88
$23.08
$23.88
$26.89
$31.59
$33.83
$32.79
$21.42
$21.34
$22.09
$23.24
$23.69
Maximum
$23.87
$26.24
$28.90
$26.38
$28.90
$24.74
$30.17
$31.36
$38.43
$32.04
$32.67
$65.52
$31.16
$29.54
$53.99
$82.68
$42.13
$33.33
$41.13
$49.58
$30.91
$26.62
$42.08
$27.83
$35.45
$42.98
$24.73
$25.04
$25.77
$26.83
$37.32
$25.09
$49.45
$54.56
$29.78
$30.67
$30.67
$31.94
$31.94
$36.00
$23.41
$54.48
$26.67
$36.75
$38.94
$25.42
$33.97
$25.45
$26.25
$27.69
$28.66
$32.27
$37.91
$40.60
$39.35
$25.70
$25.61
$26.51
$27.88
$28.43
Monthly Pay Rates
Pay Range
Annual Pay Rates
Pay Range
Minimum
Midpoint
Maximum
Minimum Midpoint Maximum
$2,758
$3,032
$3,340
$3,048
$3,340
$2,859
$3,487
$3,623
$4,441
$3,702
$3,775
$7,571
$3,601
$3,413
$6,239
$9,555
$4,868
$3,852
$4,753
$5,729
$3,572
$3,076
$4,863
$3,216
$4,096
$4,966
$2,857
$2,894
$2,978
$3,101
$4,312
$2,899
$5,714
$6,305
$3,441
$3,544
$3,544
$3,691
$3,447
$3,790
$4,175
$3,810
$4,175
$3,573
$4,358
$4,529
$5,551
$4,628
$4,719
$9,464
$4,501
$4,266
$7,799
$11,943
$6,085
$4,814
$5,941
$7,161
$4,465
$3,845
$6,078
$4,020
$5,120
$6,208
$3,572
$3,617
$3,722
$3,876
$5,390
$3,624
$7,143
$7,881
$4,301
$4,429
$4,429
$4,613
$4,137
$4,548
$5,010
$4,572
$5,010
$4,288
$5,230
$5,435
$6,661
$5,553
$5,663
$11,356
$5,401
$5,119
$9,358
$14,332
$7,302
$5,777
$7,129
$8,593
$5,357
$4,614
$7,294
$4,824
$6,144
$7,450
$4,286
$4,341
$4,466
$4,651
$6,469
$4,348
$8,571
$9,458
$5,162
$5,315
$5,315
$5,536
$3,691
$4,613
$5,536
$4,160
$2,705
$6,295
$5,201
$3,382
$7,869
$6,241
$4,058
$9,443
$3,082
$4,247
$4,500
$2,937
$3,925
$2,941
$3,034
$3,200
$3,312
$3,729
$4,381
$4,691
$4,547
$2,970
$2,959
$3,063
$3,222
$3,285
$3,853
$5,309
$5,625
$3,672
$4,907
$3,676
$3,792
$4,000
$4,139
$4,661
$5,476
$5,864
$5,683
$3,713
$3,699
$3,829
$4,028
$4,106
$4,623
$6,371
$6,750
$4,406
$5,888
$4,411
$4,551
$4,800
$4,967
$5,593
$6,571
$7,037
$6,820
$4,455
$4,439
$4,595
$4,833
$4,928
$33,096
$36,382
$40,078
$36,574
$40,078
$34,302
$41,841
$43,480
$53,289
$44,424
$45,303
$90,851
$43,212
$40,956
$74,866
$114,655
$58,419
$46,219
$57,030
$68,746
$42,860
$36,912
$58,350
$38,591
$49,153
$59,598
$34,287
$34,726
$35,731
$37,209
$51,749
$34,787
$68,571
$75,660
$41,294
$42,523
$42,523 $53,154 $63,784
$44,288 $55,360 $66,432
$44,288 $55,360 $66,432
$49,925 $62,407 $74,888
$32,463 $40,578 $48,694
$75,540 $94,425 $113,310
$36,984 $46,230 $55,476
$50,965 $63,707 $76,448
$54,003 $67,504 $81,005
$35,247 $44,059 $52,871
$47,104 $58,880 $70,656
$35,290 $44,112 $52,935
$36,406 $45,507 $54,609
$38,400 $48,000 $57,600
$39,738 $49,673 $59,607
$44,746 $55,933 $67,119
$52,570 $65,712 $78,855
$56,294 $70,368 $84,441
$54,559 $68,198 $81,838
$35,641 $44,551 $53,461
$35,509 $44,387 $53,264
$36,757 $45,946 $55,135
$38,666 $48,332 $57,999
$39,421 $49,277 $59,132
$41,370
$45,478
$50,097
$45,718
$50,097
$42,878
$52,301
$54,350
$66,612
$55,531
$56,628
$113,563
$54,014
$51,195
$93,582
$143,318
$73,024
$57,774
$71,288
$85,933
$53,574
$46,141
$72,938
$48,239
$61,442
$74,497
$42,859
$43,407
$44,664
$46,511
$64,686
$43,484
$85,714
$94,575
$51,618
$53,154
$49,644
$54,573
$60,117
$54,861
$60,117
$51,453
$62,761
$65,220
$79,934
$66,637
$67,954
$136,276
$64,817
$61,434
$112,299
$171,982
$87,628
$69,329
$85,545
$103,119
$64,289
$55,369
$87,525
$57,887
$73,730
$89,397
$51,431
$52,089
$53,596
$55,814
$77,623
$52,181
$102,856
$113,490
$61,941
$63,784
Agenda
Updated on: 11/14/2016
Page 45 of 167
R:\RecordenSalary Survey01-08-2016\Market Analysis - Moab 11-8-2016
Attachment 4
Salary Survey Pay Plan Adjustments
Projected Fiscal Impacts
Phase 1 -
Year 1 - Implementation
Salaries
Benefits
Total
bring all employees within the
Minimum of ranges
$ 100,978.41
$ 21,290.94
$ 122,269.34
Phase 2 -
bring employees with 7+ years to
Midpoint of ranges
$ 46,499.78
$ 14,808.82
$ 61,308.59
Phase 3 -
longevity pay range adjustment for
employees with 8+ years*
'includes a one time fixed bonus for employees
with 11+ years
$ 49,206.06
$ 9,028.90
$ 58,234.96
Phase 1 -
Total Cost Implementation Estimate $ 241,812.89
FY 2016-2017 Budget' $
227,836.00
Year 2 - Sustaining
Salaries
Benefits
Total
continue with all employees within
the Minimum of ranges
$ 201,956.81
$ 42,581.87
$ 244,538.69
Phase 2 -
bring employees with 7+ years to
Midpoint of ranges
$ 92,999.55
$ 29,617.63
$ 122,617.19
Phase 3 -
longevity pay range adjustment for
employees with 8+ years*
$ 41,912.11
$ 18,057.80
$ 59,969.91
Total Sustained Cost Estimate $ 427,125.79
Agenda
Page 46 of 167
Attachment 5
r
a
to
a
To
a
a
Q
$170,000
$160, 000
$150,000
$140, 000
$130,000
$120,000
$110,000
$100,000
$90,000
$80,000
$70,000
$60,000
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
Job Value
urvey Minimum
—Survey Midpoint
Survey Maximum
—si—R- City Actual
O C-City Actual
20.00
25.00
1
30.00
Page 47 of 167
Attachment 6
Option #2
Employee pay rate falls below
midpoint. Increases are
added to the Base Pay.
Employee pay rate falls at or
above midpoint. Increases are
added to the Base Pay.
Employee pay rate falls at or
above midpoint. Award treated as
a one time bonus.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
Pay For Performance
Performance Score
<3
1 3-3.25
1 3.26-3.5
1 3.51-3.751
3.76-4
1 4.1-4.25
1 4.26-4.5
1 >4.5
.7T!' .w
0.00%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
5.00%
Performance
Incentive
0.000/0
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.000/0
0.00%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
Longevity
Recognition
Now: As per existing policy.
Beginning in 2 years (January 2019) employees would only be eligible
for longevity pay if their performance score was a 3.0 or greater.
Page 48 of 167
Attachment 7
Moab City -
Proposed Pay for Performance
COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT
A. POLICY: Compensation for city employees shall be equitable and competitive with the market and
in accord with the city's ability to pay. The compensation plan and pay rates shall be recommended
by the City Manager/Personnel Officer, Human Resource Coordinator and/or Job Classification
Committee for approval by the Mayor and City Council.
B. GENERAL WAGE/SALARY ADJUSTMENTS: It is the intent of the city to consider prevailing
practices related to cost of living and market trends in establishing wages and salaries which
constitute the formal pay schedule. On all occasions the amount of the rate changes will ultimately
be based upon the anticipated affect(s) upon the city budget.
The Personnel Officer, based upon final Mayoral and Council approval and after a public hearing
process, will make final recommendations of any changes to the salary scale. Where general,
across-the-board adjustments are approved, the change will be effective on a date determined and
approved by the City Council. General adjustments are separate and distinct from performance
recognition bonuses and longevity increases. General adjustments may affect the pay scale only,
thus shifting the pay of all employees in relation to the midpoint.
1. COST -OF -LIVING VS. MARKET: Adjustments to the salary schedule may be determined
periodically through analysis of market trends in comparison to cost -of -living. This may be
done once per year and the city may utilize either market survey results or cost -of -living index
data (federal) or a combination of both. All employees, regardless of employment status,
except those being red circled (frozen), shall receive the benefits of such general COLA
adjustments to the pay plan.
2. In determining the total compensation value of the position, benefits must be considered. Base
salary plus cost of benefits constitutes total compensation. In comparing benefit packages
provided in the labor market, the city may evaluate both level and cost of benefits or other
factors as deemed appropriate.
C. HOURLY RATES: Temporary full time and all part time, seasonal and emergency employees shall
be paid at an hourly rate no higher than that which is established for the position classification.
D. INITIAL APPOINTMENT: All initial appointments to positions assigned to salary ranges on the
compensation plan shall normally be at the minimum rate of the salary range. Exceptions may be
allowed if: (1) an employee cannot be recruited for the position at the beginning rate, or (2) the
qualifications of the individual selected for the position exceed the minimum requirements and the
individual can be expected to perform at a level equal to that of other individuals currently being
paid at the same rate. In determining placement on the pay plan under exception two, a newly
hired employee may receive one percent for every year of directly related experience which
exceeds the number of years required to meet the minimum qualifications, except that initial
placement may not exceed 95% of the midpoint of the pay range.
Exceptions for Exempt initial appointments may be considered for approval by the Personnel
Officer by means of written justification showing extraordinary circumstances or unique market
challenges in filling Exempt positions.
1
Agenda
Page 49 of 167
Current city employees who are awarded new jobs through the recruitment process, may receive
one percent for each year of directly related experience which exceeds the number of years
required to meet the minimum qualifications, except that initial placement may exceed the midpoint
of the pay range if the employee has over five years of experience with the city. The Human
Resources Coordinator shall monitor recommended starting rates for compliance to policy and
must inform the Personnel Officer and Mayor and Council of appointments that are recommended
to be made at rates higher than the midpoint.
E. ORIENTATION PERIOD: All newly hired employees of the city are required to complete a six-
month orientation period. During the six month period the supervisor shall conduct a formal
performance appraisal. At the conclusion of this orientation period and being retained the
employee will be eligible for up to a three percent (3%) increase on the salary range, provided
he/she is retained as an employee and has satisfactory performance reviews from the immediate
supervisor or Department Head. Successful completion of the orientation period results in the
award of "regular" status to the employee, part-time or fulltime.
F PROMOTION ORIENTATION PERIOD: Upon being promoted to a position in a higher
classification (job track promotions), regular employees are assigned a review date not to exceed
six months from the date of promotion. On the date of promotion, the employee will be eligible for
an increase within the salary range. The employee shall retain the increase and the promotion,
provided he/she demonstrates the expected level of competence required to perform the higher -
level position and receives a satisfactory performance review from the immediate supervisor or
Department Head. The amount of the pay increase may exceed 5% if adjusting to the minimum
for the new pay range exceeds the 5% rule. If the promoted employee fails to perform satisfactorily,
termination could occur if there are no position vacancies.
G. PAY PROGRESSION: Progression through the various pay ranges within the salary and wage
scale shall be based upon the recommendation of the Department Head and Human Resource
Coordinator with final approval given by City Manager/Personnel Officer. In making
recommendations for pay progression, the Department Head shall consider compliance with city
policies and procedures, performance, level of competence and job knowledge.
1. MINIMUM TO MIDPOINT PROGRESSION: Upon completion of the orientation period and
receiving regular status with a pay adjustment, employees shall be assigned a new annual
performance review date by the Human Resources Coordinator. It is the objective of the city
that employees acquire job skills that are considered full performance level within their job
classification by the time they arrive at midpoint of the pay range of the job classification in
which they are hired to perform. It is the responsibility of the department head and immediate
supervisor to identify the essential skills, competence, and quality of work that will satisfy the
"full performance" requirement. "Full Performance" is generally achieved when the employee
can perform virtually all aspects of the position's essential functions without supervision and
with minimal errors. Employees, in conjunction with supervisors shall develop a performance
plan based upon achieving full performance competence. Full performance (or journey level
for trades and crafts) should be achievable in four to five years.
Therefore, employees who progress at a normal rate may be recommended for
increases in accordance with approved Pay Schedules for that position. At least four
weeks prior to the annual review date, the supervisor shall conduct a performance
review and prepare a written recommendation to the City Manager/Personnel Officer and
Human Resource Coordinator.
Initiation of a request to increase pay lies solely within the discretion of the Department Head
and is not a vested right of any employee. Such requests are normally considered annually in
2
Agenda
Page 50 of 167
conjunction with the budget process, but may be considered more frequently for the exceptional
performer.
2. MIDPOINT TO MAXIMUM PROGRESSION: Compensation at the midpoint is considered
market competitive. In order to be considered for increases beyond the midpoint, the employee
must receive at least a standard rating on their annual performance evaluation.
Each employee who meets this requirement may receive increases in accordance with
approved Pay Schedules for that position, up to the maximum of the pay range. Upon achieving
the maximum, the employee shall still be eligible for any general increase or adjustment to the pay
plan (i.e., market, COLA, etc.) and for consideration for one-time performance incentives.
H. RECOGNITION/INCENTIVE AWARDS : In order to promote exceptional or outstanding services
and recognize those occasions where services are rendered, emergencies responded to, or
proficiencies demonstrated which are beyond the normal occurrence or expectation of the job; it is
the position of the city to reward such individual or group contributions. These awards shall be a
one-time recognition, in that they are not added to the regular or base pay of the recipient(s).
1. CRITERIA: Monetary and non -monetary awards may be given for:
a. Ways to increase office or operational efficiencies. If there is a process in the normal
routine of the work place that is time consuming, a waste of one's time, repetitive, or a burden
on the budget, there may be a means for improvement. This is a criterion where creative ideas
improve departmental efficiency or effectiveness or eliminate difficulties.
b. Exemplary performance on special projects. An employee may be given a special project.
A great deal of effort and research may go into the project. The project may benefit the
department or city in some way.
c. Exemplary performance on special group projects. A group of individuals may be given a
difficult task to perform. The team may work together to complete the difficult task in a timely
and effective manner that benefits the department, city or general public.
d. Cost Savings. An employee may suggest a procedure that will save costs to the department
or city. Similarly, an employee may suggest a procedure for generating revenue.
e. The exercise of leadership and/or initiative beyond that normally expected in the individuals
regular assignments. An employee may be required to meet unusual deadlines or perform in
emergency situations. An employee may demonstrate a willingness to accept and perform
new assignments on a short-term basis.
f. Performance which averts legal actions by or against the city.
g.
Actions which bring favorable public or professional attention or recognition to the
department or city.
h. Independent research and analysis initiated by an employee resulting in a contribution to
the specific objectives or improved methods for delivering city services or conducting city
operations.
2. NOMINATION PROCESS:
a. Nominations may be made by any city employee, supervisor, manager, department head
or member of the public and must be delivered to the City Manager/Personnel Officer with a
copy to the Human Resources Coordinator.
3
Agenda
Page 51 of 167
b. Effective January 1, 2017, incentive awards will be considered every six months. On a
calendar year cycle, nominations will be accepted during the fifth month in each six-month
period (May and November), with awards being made in June and December.
c. Nominations must involve a detailed description of the project or act and the nominated
employee's involvement in the act. It must also explain why the act is worthy of consideration
for an incentive award.
d. In order to consider eligibility for an award an Incentive Awards Committee shall be
established. The Incentive Awards Committee has the authority to research beyond the initial
description with the approval of the City Manager/Personnel Officer and/or Human Resource
Coordinator.
3. COMMITTEE ORGANIZATION:
a. The committee shall consist of one member from each city department; plus the Human
Resource Coordinator, who shall serve as committee chairperson. Representatives from each
department may be selected or appointed by any means chosen by the department head (i.e.,
departmental voting vs. mayoral or department head appointment).
b. Each member of the committee shall serve a period of six consecutive months. At the end
of each six-month period, a new committee shall be established, except that the Human
Resource Coordinator shall remain as the committee chair indefinitely.
c. The committee shall meet during the first two weeks of the sixth month in each incentive
period to review and consider the incentive award nominations. The committee shall determine
which nominations for incentive pay is worthy and make such recommendations to the city
council, including level and type of award.
d. If a member of the committee discovers that they have been nominated for an award, that
person must withdraw from the committee, and the department head must appoint a
replacement.
e. In order to be considered for a committee position, the employee must have been
employed at least three years by the city.
f. All votes for awards will be considered by majority vote.
4. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS:
a. The city must set aside annual award funds to be divided equally among the two award
periods.
b. When awarded, the City Manager/Personnel Officer shall make the announcement at a
predetermined event or time, specifying award amounts and statement of justification for each.
c. The committee shall provide a statement that describes the amount of the award as well
as justification for the award. This statement shall be placed in the employee's permanent
personnel file.
5. AWARD RESTRICTIONS:
a. The most recent performance evaluation must be at least standard in order for the
committee to consider a nomination.
4
Agenda
Page 52 of 167
b. A nomination that is not granted an award may be resubmitted for two consecutive
nomination periods.
c. Levels for cash awards will be approved annually as part of the pay plan .
d. More than one incentive award of different sizes may be given to the same employee,
providing that the performance qualifies.
e. Normally, no more than one incentive award may be given for the same or substantially
similar act.
f. Awards may be shared by a team of employees, provided all of the employees contribute
to the project or act.
g. Employees shall not be considered for an incentive award for performance that is routinely
expected for any duty or responsibility.
�. RED CIRCLE RATE: This provision refers to the rate of pay for an employee whose pay falls above
the current maximum salary for the pay range to which assigned, reclassified or transferred. Such
employee(s) shall be placed on a salary freeze for a period not to exceed two (2) years and shall
not be eligible for any general adjustment (COLA) given during the same period of time. During
the two-year period, if the employee's rate of pay falls back within the assigned pay range, the
freeze shall be lifted. If at the end of two years, the employee's pay rate still falls above the
maximum of the pay range, that employee's pay rate shall be reduced to the maximum of the
assigned position.
J. RIGHT TO AGGREIVE: This compensation management plan is subject to the City's grievance
policy as outlined in Section IX of the Moab Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual.
5
Agenda
Page 53 of 167
11/14/2016 City of Moab Mail - Agenda Item tuesday: Fwd: Special Event Permit Refund Request
Rachel Stenta <rstenta@moabcity.org>
Agenda Item tuesday: Fwd: Special Event Permit Refund Request
David Everitt <deveritt@moabcity.org> Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:47 PM
To: Rachel Stenta <rstenta@moabcity.org>
Forwarded message
From: Tawny Knuteson-Boyd <tknuteson-boyd@moabcity.org>
Date: Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: Special Event Permit Refund Request
To: Claire Core <claire.core@aggiemail.usu.edu>
Cc: City Council <city-council@moabcity.org>
Claire,
I'm not sure if you did this in the address line of the email or not. Please forward this on to staff, either Rachel Stenta or
David Everitt. They will put it on the next agenda as an action item.
Thanks for reminding us.
Tawny Boyd
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Claire Core <claire.core@aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote:
On October 25th, Resiliency Hub/Canyonlands Community Recycling submitted a request for a Special Event Permit
along with a letter requesting a refund of the associated fee. The Special Event Permit was granted but the refund
request was not acted on. I am requesting that our refund request be considered at your next board meeting.
I have included a pdf of the refund letter below.
We appreciate your consideration.
Best,
Claire Core
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "City Council" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city-council+unsubscribe@moabc
ity.org.
To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city-council/C6BF5014-
910E-43C4-878A-4795814E9E25%40aggiemail. usu.edu.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "City Council" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city-council+unsubscribe@moabc
ity.org.
To post to this group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city-council/C6BF5014-
910E-43C4-878A-4795814E9E25%40aggiemail. usu.edu.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "City Council" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to city-council+unsubscribe@moabc
ity.org.
s group, send email to city-council@moabcity.org.
Agenda
Page 54 of 167
https://m ai I.googl e.com/m ai I/u/0/?ui=2&i k=0bf0a4325f&view=pt&search=i nbox&m sg=1586497d9f96b0e6&si m 1=1586497d9f96b0e6 1/2
11/14/2016 City of Moab Mail - Agenda Item tuesday: Fwd: Special Event Permit Refund Request
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/moabcity.org/d/msgid/city-counci
1/CACZSpoepB Rn_UcbJ4m3Uenbt2gpy6REDMocjki-fGJ b_VMfLhg%40mail.gmail.com.
Agenda
Page 55 of 167
https://m ai I.googl e.com/m ai I/u/0/?ui=2&i k=0bf0a4325f&view=pt&search=i nbox&m sg=1586497d9f96b0e6&si m 1=1586497d9f96b0e6 2/2
City of Moab
City Council Policy
Regarding the Consideration of Fee Waiver Requests
It is the general policy of the Moab City Council to not consider requests for fee waivers for city
programs, services, permits and licenses. Further, the City Council has determined that exceptions
to this general policy may be made at the sole discretion of the City Council, subject to certain
conditions, as follows:
1. Requests for an exception to the fee waiver policy shall be made in writing at one month
prior to the event or service for which the fee is charged. Such requests shall be submitted
to the City Recorder's Office. If this timeframe is not met, the fee shall be paid in full, and
the request will be considered as a request for a refund rather than a waiver.
2. The following fees are not subject to an exception under this policy:
a. Fees related to public works, including but not limited to water and sewer fees,
water and sewer impact fees, storm water drainage fees and solid waste fees.
b. Fees related to planning and zoning, including but not limited to subdivision fees,
annexation fees and permit fees.
c. Fees related to recreation programs and services.
d. Fees related to law enforcement, with the exception of traffic control and security
fees associated with a special event.
e. Fees related to alcohol.
f. Other fees not provided for in this policy.
3. The City Council may consider an exception to the fee waiver policy for special -event -
related fees, including special event permit fees, special event business license fees, park
use permit fees, banner fees, and traffic control fees and security fees, if the organization
requesting the exception meets at least one of the following criteria:
a. The event, as its main function, is a fundraiser for a charitable organization that
provides services to Moab residents.
b. The organization sponsoring the event has in the past made and commits to
continue to make in the future, a financial donation to the City that covers all or a
portion of the costs associated with the event for which the organization is seeking
an exception.
c. The event organizer is a governmental entity.
d. The event's primary purpose is to provide a school program or to benefit a school or
school program.
e. The primary purpose of the event is to provide a community -wide celebration or
program that is offered free of charge to community members.
f. The event is one that has been provided by the City in the past.
4. The City Council may consider an exception to the fee waiver policy for building permit
fees only for requests made by Grand County or the City of Moab for county or city -owned
facilities.
Page 56 of 167
MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 221 2016 I
/
Agenda Summary
Item #:6-2
t
Title: Approval of Permits for the 2017 Moab Rocks Mountain Bike Stage Race and
Social to be held March 24-28
Fiscal Impact: This is an annual event in the community. Law enforcement and
other city services are needed to support this event. The special event, park and beer
permit fees provide revenue to the city, as does the sales tax generated by the purchase
of goods and services by the participants of the event.
Staff Presenter(s): Amy Weiser, Community Services Director
Department: Community Services
Applicant: Kevin McDonald/TransRockies US LP
Background/Summary:
Kevin McDonald/TransRockies US LP submitted all of the required applications to hold
the 2o17 Moab Rocks Mountain Bike Stage Race and Social, utilizing Swanny City Park,
and the City right-of-way. In the past this event occurred in October, but the event
organizers felt they would have greater attendance in March. The applicant has
coordinated and will continue to coordinate with other government entities including
the Utah Department of Transportation the Bureau of Land Management.
Please note that several of the required/permits are contingent upon other approvals.
The following approvals are needed:
i. Approval of a Special Business Event License
2. Approval of a Class IV Special Event Beer License
3. Approval of a Park Use Permit for Swanny City Park
4. Approval of Park Alcohol Permit for Swanny City Park
5. Approval of Local Consent for a state -issued Special Event Beer Permit
The City Special Events Committee reviewed the applications for the required permits
and licenses for the proposed event. City support is needed for the Stage i race day on
Saturday March 25. Police support is needed for traffic control from Swanny Park up to
Agenda
Page 57 of 167
Sand Flats Road. Approval of the Park Alcohol Permit should be conditioned upon
securing state approval of the Special Event Beer Permit and submitting said permit
and documentation to the City.
Options: The Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny or continue the
item.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of all items with the
following conditions:
1. The following shall be completed and or provided to the City two weeks prior to
the event
a. Event staff should coordinate with the Parks Superintendent and Safety
Officer on location of the Porta-potties. Porta-potties shall not be
located on the grass.
b. All park fees and special event fees shall be paid.
c. Copy of UTAH DABC Special Event Beer Permit approvals
d.
Recommended Motion:
"I move to approve the 2o17 Moab Rocks subject to the conditions outlined in the
Agenda Summary"
Attachment(s):
Special Business Event License Application
Class IV Special Event Beer License Application
Application for the Special Use of City Parks
Application for Park Alcohol Permit
Application for Local Consent for a Special Event Beer Permit
rAgenda
Page 58 of 167
-7/V11
TRANSROCKIES'
RACE SERIES
Miss Jennie Ross
City Treasurer
City of Moab
217 East Center Street
Moab, Utah 84532
Dear Jennie,
By way of this letter, please accept our application for the 4`h annual Moab Rocks
mountain bike race on March 24-28, 2017 at Swanny Park. We will not be holding an
event in 2016.
Once again, we will work closely with the BLM (Jenny Jones), City of Moab Police
Department, and Moab Trail Mix (Scott Escott) to ensure a safe and friendly event.
Please let me know if you have any concerns or questions about the application.
Best Regards,
Kevin J. McDonald
VP, Director of Operations
TransRockies US LP
Cell: 403.483.9977
Page 59 of 167
I II IIVLV IV
Race Guide & Schedule:
WIVGV I - I I CIl larWl..Np f\QVC JCI Ip uy 1 I 01 IJIlulA•lp CV CI IW
Moab Rocks 2017 — Daily Schedule
Subject to Change
Registration
Location
Registration Times
Call to Start
Race Start
Start Location
Finish Location
Latest Finish
Awards Ceremonies
Daily Briefing
Pictures of the day
Ceremonies & Social
Ceremonies & Social
Location
ca
c
CD
klird/}rnr ice rnm/mnnh.rnrire/
Q
Stage 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Friday, March 24th Saturday, March Sunday, March 26th Monday, March
25th 27th
Moab Recreation &
Aquatic Ctr. 374
Park Ave.
5:00 PM — 7:00 PM
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7:15 PM
N/A
5:30 PM — 7:30 PM
Swanny City Park
Moab Recreation & N/A
Aquatic Ctr. 374
Park Ave.
7:15 AM — 8:00 N/A
AM
8:10 AM
8:30 AM
W. 400 N. in front
of the aquatic Ctr.
end of timed
descent, 3.7
mi before trailhead
4:00 PM
6:30 PM
6:50 PM
7:00 PM
5:30 PM — 7:30 PM
Swanny City Park
Page 60 of 167
8:10 AM
8:30 AM
Klondike Bluffs
Gemini Bridges
Parking Lot
7:30AM-8:00
AM
8:10 AM
8:30 AM
Base of Gemini
Bridges Road —10
Miles from Moab
Klondike Bluffs Base of Gemini
Bridges Road
4:00 PM
6:30 PM
6:50 PM
7:00 PM
5:30 PM — 7:30 PM
Swanny City Park
4:00 PM
6:30 PM
N/A
7:00 PM
5:30 PM — 7:30 PM
Swanny City Park
111
'saotnap ardpunut won 56urpvu uo pang dilemma arpprw a ow toi upi6 11101Mlya !not too 'Spowsw uopvrnarea our S•M1n011 rap Snoltvn am Aral *MAIMS iuualrp se 'Mnollvrd 6ulddew to •ornap Ag aingtvn AryOry aq Amu qvp uopenum.
oz s� of s o
1gPr'
�b
)IS
n
)I9
6ulpuaasep • own
`uie6 uopenafa 14 00Z `salsui SI
lue3sea pawl"
;dial 0092 :uie9 uoilena13
sailm Sz :aauelsta
Lum auldn3.iod aBelS
r
"'" r Y..
r 'L' Jam..'
' ,laa rJ !1!W- e
't , 1 -,
a.
-up,,ft,.
...vkltye4
�JL
,c
[•
r- c.
• - 1�d?
i.., .
7-1: ''' ' ?-,_ - ..-1
,-;.A
., 1
.r, ,t,.�I1H� }�.sl. ea,dy
LiL_"',''r"`-""`" i ie,
; _ . sslulaNS
P11M 'Lu4A6 �+ UOU J 11lB
at
"loos:. y;
, {x.: r0
r
�iF
;l
a
W
r♦
y
•
S11130S3U H3W11 HIM
331a 3X GIN AVG £
nlArl
• -0,
smians ��da
s31)1001:1sNVUL
QeO14 41'7,-
!' 1.1 e1
„s
-7
t
ysmuld
Page 61 of 167
epuaBy
" o s a l n a p g d p i n w w o 1 j s a u l p a u u o w a g s p s w n s s y p p i w a y s g n w a u l 1 o ; s n u f f u o p e n o u s I o i o l 1 n o '