Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2016-05-05 packet Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Room 120 320 E. McCarty. Jefferson City. MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457 Technical Committee Thursday. May 5,2016 at 10:00 A.M. Boone/Bancroft Room#200-John G.Christy Municipal Building 320 E. McCarty Street,Jefferson City, MO 65101 Enter through Main Lobby Tentative Agenda Presentation: Mobility Manager Update by Mr. Anthony Nichols, MO RIDES 1. Call to order, roll call,and determination of a quorum 2. Public comment 3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended 4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of April 7,2016 5. Communications received 6. Old Business A. Draft 2017—2021 Transportation Improvement Program(Rotenberry) Action Requested: Discussion and Recommendation to Board of Directors B. Draft FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program (Sanders) Action Requested:Discussion and Recommendation to Board of Directors 7. New Business A. Metropolitan Transportation Plan Amendment—TIP Incorporation (Sanders) Action Requested: Discussion and Recommendation to Board of Directors B. MoDOT Functional Classification Change on US 50,US 54 and US 63 (Engelbrecht) Action Requested: Review and Discussion C. JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment Selection Committee(Sanders) Action Requested: Discussion and Recommendation to Board of Directors 8. Other Business A. Status of current work tasks B. Member Updates 9. Next Meeting Date-Thursday,June 2,2016 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room 10. Adjournment Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call(573)634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. MINUTES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION April 7,2016 10:00 a.m. VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT Cole County: Larry Benz Eric Landwehr* Holts Summit: Mark Tate Jefferson City: David Bange,Vice Chairman* Janice McMillan Mark Mehmert Matt Morasch Sonny Sanders Britt Smith Todd Spalding MoDOT: Steve Engelbrecht Michael Henderson Wardsville: David Elliott Pedestrian or Biking Interest: Cary Maloney Private Transportation Interest:Joe Scheppers *Arrived Late VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT Paul Winkelmann,Callaway County Bob Lynch, Missouri Department of Transportation EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT Michael Latuszek, Federal Highway Administration EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT Jeremiah Shuler, Federal Transit Administration STAFF PRESENT(Non-Voting) Katrina Williams,Transportation Planner Anne Stratman,Administrative Assistant,City of Jefferson GUESTS PRESENT Bruce Green, Missouri Department of Transportation Susan Summers, Missouri Department of Transportation 1. Call to order,roll call,and determination of a quorum Ms. McMillan called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. and asked Ms. Stratman to call roll. A quorum of 11 voting members was present. 2. Public comment None received. 3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended Mr. Sanders requested to amend the agenda to add a new item regarding pavement management. He also requested to reorder the agenda since a few Committee members will be late. Mr. Sanders moved and Mr. Benz seconded to adopt the agenda as amended. The motion passed unanimously. 4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of February 4,2016 Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of February 4,2016 as printed. The motion passed unanimously. Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee April 7, 2016 Page 2 5. Communications from the presiding officer None. 6. Old Business A. Draft 2017—2021 Transportation Improvement Program(TIP) Mr. Sanders discussed the next steps. He stated that the draft TIP will be forwarded to FHWA, FTA and MoDOT for their review. Mr. Sanders explained that the Technical Committee will review the final draft at their May 5 meeting and forward to the Board of Directors to initiate the public comment period at their May 18 meeting. Mr. Sanders stated that the Board of Directors could potentially adopt the TIP at their June 15 meeting. B. FY2017 United Planning Work Program Mr. Sanders explained that new work items include: (1) update of the Coordinated Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan; (2) update of the CAMPO Title VI Plan; (3)evaluation of effectiveness of the CAMPO public participation process;and(4)pavement management system. 7. New Business A. Missouri Boulevard Safety Assessment Mr. Sanders explained that CAMPO in conjunction with the City of Jefferson, MoDOT, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration and the National Highway Safety and Transportation Administration will perform a safety assessment beginning at West Main Street and extending to the other side of the Highway 179 overpass.He stated that the goal is to identify potential dangerous safety gaps within the corridor. Mr. Landwehr arrived at 10:20 a.m. B. Planning Partner Overview Mr. Henderson gave a presentation on the topics discussed at the Statewide Planning Partners Meeting on February 18, 2016. He distributed the following handouts: (1) meeting agenda; (2) financial summary; (3) 207-2021 STIP Financial Forecast Assumptions;(4)Bridge Update;and(5)road miles report. Mr. Henderson reported that MoDOT will be submitting projects for the TIGER Grant and the FAST Lane Grant. C. Pavement Management System Mr. Smith explained that the City of Jefferson,Cole County and City of Holts Summit in conjunction with the Midwest Transportation Center is exploring a pavement management system. He stated that a funding mechanism/funding source needs to be determined. Mr. Smith explained that the cost of the project is $110,000 and will require a location match of$55,000. Mr. Spalding left at 10:45 a.m. Mr. Sanders explained that this item is not included in the FY2016 Unified Planning Work Program. He stated that in order to spend MPO funds we would have to write a letter to MoDOT redirecting those funds to this project. Mr. Sanders explained that this would not require Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission approval unless there is an amendment to the FY2016 Unified Planning Work Program to increase the MPO budget. Mr. Landwehr inquired of the dollar amount that CAMPO can contribute to the project. Mr. Morasch suggested asking CAMPO staff to research what dollar amount they would have available to contribute to this project. Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Sanders seconded to move forward with this project conditional upon CAMPO researching the dollar amount. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Bange arrived at 1 1:00 a.m. Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee April 7, 2016 Page 3 D. Jefferson City Safety Education Campaign Mr. Bange explained that certain portions of Dunklin Street, Bolivar Street and West Main Street will be striped with Advisory Bicycle Lanes. He stated that Advisory Bicycle Lanes allow motorists to be in the bicycle lanes when bicyclists are not present. Mr. Bange explained that they propose installing these bicycle lanes this summer in conjunction with the Wayfinding signs. He recommended incorporating educational components such as flyers or handouts,presentations and an animated website tool. 8. Other Business A. Status of current work tasks • Transit Study RFQ • FY2016 STP allocation and balance • Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Update B. Member Updates Cole County --Mr. Landwehr reported on gravel road updates and bridge replacement on Liberty Road near Taos. He mentioned that the '/2 cent sales tax initiative passed at the April 5,2016 election. Federal Highway Administration --Mr. Latuszek reported that he will be giving an MPO 101 presentation at the April 20,2016 Board of Directors meeting. Holts Summit --Mr. Tate gave an update on the Halifax Road Realignment project and the N. Summit Drive Safe Routes to School project. Jefferson City --Mr. Bange gave an update on the Wayfinding Signage Plan; and the Stadium Boulevard/Jefferson Street project. --Mr. Mehmert reported that JEFFTRAN received three new Handiwheel busses in March 2016. He reported that JEFFTRAN is a recipient of a Section 5307 Grant in the amount of$750,000. --Mr.Smith gave an update on airport projects. Missouri Department of Transportation --Mr. Engelbrecht gave an update on the Missouri River Bridge Project --Mr. Henderson gave an update on the state fuel tax increase 9. Next Meeting Date-Thursday, May 5,2016 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room. 10. Adjournment Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Benz seconded to adjourn the meeting at 11:43 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant Capital Area Metropolitan . ik Planning Organization Room 120. 320 F. McCarty St.. Jefferson City. MO 65 1 t11 Phone: 573.634.6410 Fax: 573.634.6457 9Vlemoranclum TO: CAMPO Technical Committee FROM: Alex Rotenberry,Transportation Planner DATE: April 28, 2016 SUBJECT: 2017-2021 Transportation Improvement Program Development of the 2017-2021 TIP continues. A 'Courtesy Preliminary Draft TIP' was forwarded to OneDOT and MoDOT for comments on April 8, 2016, with the understanding that some projects may be altered or added prior to submission of the final draft for official review and comments. All comments received were addressed. Staff is requesting the Technical Committee forward the Draft 2017-2021 Transportation Improvement Program to the Board of Directors. At the May 18 Board of Directors meeting, it is anticipated that the 25-day public comment period will commence. TIP development is one month behind schedule per the Annual Transportation Improvement Program Timeline, which indicates the public comment period should start in April. Staff anticipates the public comment period to commence in May and a Board of Directors approved TIP in mid-June. If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Alex Rotenberry at 573- 634-6525 or by email at arotenberry@jeffcitymo.org. Agenda Item 6A Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Transportation Improvement Program Program Years 2017 - 2021 July 1, 2016 —June 30, 2021 -- � 4 P .. ;:y+' ` j\;;„ciej LC UN.74 B8 GIL Lii j ma®.r ,,l z s.4 tin . ___:. �l " .... AA, „ CAMP A Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation.The opinions,findings,and conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation. Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits of,or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the grounds of race,color,sex,age,disability or national origin,in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987(P.L. 100.259). Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson Department of Planning and Protective Services Room 120 John G.Christy Municipal Building 320 East McCarty St.,Jefferson City,Missouri 65101 Phone:(573)634-6410 Fax:(573)634-6457 http://www.jeffersoncitymo.govicampo Table of Contents Introduction 1 Public Participation 2 Project Selection 2 TIP Development 3 TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications 3 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects 3 Air Quality Designation 4 Financial Plan 4 Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding 4 Operations and Maintenance -MoDOT 7 Operations and Maintenance -Local Government 8 Financial Constraint 9 Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects 11 Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects 18 Program of Proj ects -OATS 19 Program of Projects -JEFFTRAN 20 Appendix A—Amendments and Administrative Modifications 21 Appendix B—Federal Funding Sources 22 Appendix C—Policies and Procedures 23 Appendix D—Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification 26 Appendix E—Definitions 27 (Resolution approving TIP goes here) i (CAMPO Board, TC, and staff listing goes here) ii Introduction The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization(CAMPO) is the designated metropolitan planning organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri Urbanized Area whose purpose is to carry out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive long range transportation planning process. As part of this process, in 2015, CAMPO updated the 2013-2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, a long range transportation plan addressing the current and future transportation needs for the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). The MPA includes a southern portion of Callaway County, northeastern portion of Cole County, cities of Holts Summit,Jefferson City,Lake Mykee, St. Martins, Taos,and Wardsville. CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary ' "L ' All Approved by the Board of Directors January 16,2013 Lake fyl�yy Mykee Approved by the Governor of Missouri IVaa. Al March 12,2013 _ f _--a -- i, 'm' j Holts Summil / 1 i 1 �.' tae En D 411111111111111,it. .* v in li l MaIt- ,_IV , .. ..,,,64r� - ,,,...,,,, .......,.. .......,...„,1/4 , \,, f q 0" 1' 1 .--11'7,47.„::::',..7,t°,1° Ile , 1 l7-1 A D 1 ta , 11--: __,4)\ .7-- , -1.0 ---) .//`L._ / 1 ,_ : 1 141•6 '< I'. 1. 1__, Taos 7 1 Wardsvillel. © \— ©J ri Legend — - 0 Board Approved Planning Area Boundary r� _-- //rThh \ M_ _1 Municipal Boundary % f — m The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be implemented within the MPA, which are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration(FTA), or are deemed `regionally significant.' Each project or project phase included in the TIP is to be derived from the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and is part of the process of applying for funds from the FHWA and FTA. Certain capital and non-capital transportation 1 projects using funding under 23 U.S.C. and 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or regionally significant projects requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are required to be included in the TIP. The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation and local public transportation operators. Public Participation CAMPO seeks active and meaningful involvement of the public and interested parties in the development and update of transportation plans and programs, including the TIP. All meetings of the CAMPO Technical Committee and Board of Directors are open to the public. All meeting agendas and minutes are available on the internet or upon request. CAMPO provides all interested parties and the public with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP as required by federal law. Reasonable opportunity to comment and participate on the proposed TIP is made following the policies in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan located on the CAMPO website at http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/long range transportation_plan/public_participation.php. The approved TIP is available for review several locations throughout the CAMPO planning area as outlined in the Public Participation Plan. JEFFTRAN is the public transit provider for the City of Jefferson and OATS, Inc. is a not-for-profit 501(c)3 corporation providing specialized transportation for senior citizens, people with disabilities and the rural general public in 87 Missouri counties. Federal Transit Administration recipients of certain categories of funds, JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. must follow a public participation plan. The FTA allows a grantee, e.g. JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc., to rely on locally adopted public participation plans for the submittal of their projects in lieu of a separate "Program of Projects" (POP) if the grantee has coordinated with CAMPO and ensured that the public is aware that the CAMPO's plan is being used to satisfy the POP public participation requirements. Both JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. meet this coordination and public awareness criteria CAMPO's Public Participation Plan satisfies the Federal Transit Administration's requirement of public participation for their"Program of Projects." Project Selection Transportation projects, funded by direct allocation of Federal funds to a project sponsor, award of Federal funds via competitive grant, or wholly funded by the sponsor, are selected by the agency having jurisdiction over the project using their own criteria and submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for inclusion in the TIP. Transportation projects included within the TIP should be consistent with investment strategies discussed in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Transportation projects, funded by sub-allocated Federal funds directly to CAMPO or otherwise made available for programming at the discretion of CAMPO, are selected based on competitive process approved by the CAMPO Board of Directors. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff, and review by the CAMPO Technical Committee,prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of approval. The ranking process has unique evaluation 2 criteria for different categories of projects — roadway/intersection, bridge, non-motorized, transit, and other.' TIP Development The TIP is updated every year and covers 5 years starting July 1, 2016. TIP development begins with a verification of status of projects in the current TIP, solicitation of new projects, and request for budget information from local jurisdictions. Local transit providers are also requested to provide information needed to develop their "Program of Projects" for inclusion into the TIP. CAMPO staff, with support from the Technical Committee, MoDOT, FHWA, and FTA, develop the financial plan, project listings, maintenance and operations, and other components of the TIP. Once a draft TIP is developed, it is presented to the Technical Committee for review and recommendation to the Board of Directors. A 25 day public comment period and public hearing are held prior to the Board of Directors approval of the TIP. The Board then requests approval of the TIP by the Governor. More information about public involvement activities can be found in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan. TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications Between TIP updates, if projects need to be added,removed or changed, the TIP can be changed either by amendment or administrative modifications. Definitions of an amendment or an administrative modification, and information about public participation, notifications, and other procedures regarding amendments and administrative modifications, can be found in Appendix C—Policies and Procedures of this document. Appendix A contains a listing of amendments and administrative modifications that have occurred to this document. Previous Projects The TIP will include a listing of major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and identify any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. Major projects are defined as transportation improvement projects receiving Federal financial assistance with an estimated total cost of $500 million or more or that have been identified by the FHWA as being a major project. No major projects were implemented, and no significant delays or projects from the previous TIP have been identified. Annual Listing of Obligated Projects The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) requires that CAMPO publish an annual listing of federally obligated projects. The Annual Listing of Projects is an index of projects which used 3 Federal funds that were obligated in the preceding TIP program year. Obligated projects are consistent with the funding categories identified in the TIP. An obligation is the Federal government's legal commitment to pay the Federal share of a project's cost. An obligated project is one that has been authorized and funds have been obligated by a Federal agency. Obligated projects are not necessarily initiated or completed in the program year, and the amount of the obligation will not necessarily equal the total cost of the project. For Federal Transit Administration projects, obligation occurs when the FTA grant is awarded. For Federal Highway Administration projects, obligation occurs when a project agreement is executed and the State/grantee requests that the funds be obligated. CAMPO publishes the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects yearly within 90 days of the previous TIP's program year. The Annual Listing of Obligated Projects is posted on the CAMPO website at http://www.j effersoncitymo.gov/government/longrangetransportation_plan/campo_plans_and_publicati ons.php. Air Quality Designation The United States Environmental Protection Agency has designated the CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area as being in attainment for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Small Particulate Matter(PM-2.5) Lead, and Sulfur Dioxide(SO2). Financial Plan The TIP includes a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, and indicates resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the TIP. In developing the TIP, CAMPO, MoDOT, and public transportation operators cooperatively develop estimates of funds that are reasonably expected to be available to support TIP implementation. Only projects for which construction or operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be included. In developing the financial plan, CAMPO takes into account all projects and strategies funded under title 23 U.S.C., title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, and other Federal funds; and regionally significant projects that are not federally funded. For purposes of transportation operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain system-level estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid highways (as defined by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation(as defined by title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding Federal funding forecasts, provided by MoDOT based on published notices in the Federal Register, estimate fiscal year authorization levels by the FHWA and FTA under the current highway act. Appendix B briefly describes most of the Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area. 4 For Federally-funded projects, the TIP must identify the appropriate "matching funds" by source. The matching funds are usually provided by state and local governments. State revenue forecasts are also provided by MoDOT based on historical data of the State Fuel Tax, State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax and General Revenue. Local revenue forecast from the County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax) for each jurisdiction are based on past distributions and are assumed to continue a trend of a 2 percent inflation rate. The City of Jefferson has a 1/2 cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a %2 cent sales tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports greenways and other non- motorized transportation activities. The City of Jefferson has provided its own future revenue projections from these sources. Cole County has a %2 sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a real property tax levy of$0.27 earmarked for Road&Bridges. All small cities get$100,000 every five years from Cole County,which comes from the aforementioned sales tax. Callaway County has a real property tax levy of$0.2466 earmarked for Road&Bridges. Outlined in Table 1 are local forecasts of revenue sources for over the life of the TIP available for transportation projects, operations and maintenance. 5 Table 1 -Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance. Available State Transportation Funds MoDOT 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total State Fuel Tax _ $ - State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax _ $ - Vehicle and Driver Licensing Fees $ - Interest&MiscCollections $ - General Revenue Funds $ - Total State Funds Available Local Transportation Funds Callaway County 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $ 1,725,780 $ 1,760,296 $ 1,795,502 $ 1,831,412 $ 1,868,040 $ 8,981,031 Property Tax-Road&Bridge($0.2466 levy) $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ 9,500,000 Transfer from general revenue $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 Cole County County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $ 847,618 $ 864,570 $ 881,862 $ 899,499 $ 917,489 $ 4,411,038 Sales Tax $ 5,030,870 $ 5,030,870 $ 5,030,870 $ 5,030,870 $ 5,030,870 $25,154,350 Property Tax-Road&Bridge($0.27levy) $ 3,770,847 $ 3,770,847 $ 3,770,847_$ 3,770,847 $ 3,770,847 $18,854,235 Motor Vehicle Sales Tax $ 331,268 $ 331,268 $ 331,268 $ 331,268 $ 331,268 $ 1,656,340 Halts Summit County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $ 125,970 $ 128,489 $ 131,059 $ 133,680 $ 136,354_$ 655,553 Transportation Sales Tax $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 312,000 $ 312,000_$ 1,560,000 Sales Tax $ 25,000 $ 25,750 $ 26,523 $ 27,318 $ 28,138 $ 132,728 County Road and Bridge** $ 22,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 22,000 Streets Grants** $ 535,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 535,000 Cap Imp Street Revenue $ 39,000 $ 40,170 $ 41,375 $ 42,616 $ 43,895 $ 207,056 Interest $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 8,400 $ 42,000 NID Deposits $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000_$ 35,000 City of Jefferson _ County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $ 1,735,713 $ 1,770,427 $ 1,805,836 $ 1,841,952 $ 1,878,791 $ 9,032,719 Sales Tax-1/2%Parks Sales Tax $ 4,951,878 $ 4,951,878 $ 4,951,878 $ 4,951,878 $ 4,951,878 $24,759,390 Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement(Expires March 2017) $ 22,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 22,000 Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement(Expires March 2022)*** $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 7,200,000 City of Jefferson-JEFFTRAN Passenger Fares&Misc. $ 223,193 $ 229,889 $ 236,785 $ 243,889 $ 251,205 $ 1,184,961 _ Lake Mykee County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $ 13,380 $ 13,647 $ 13,920 $ 14,199 $ 14,483 $ 69,628 St.Martins County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $ 45,932 $ 46,851 $ 47,788 $ 48,744 $ 49,718 $ 239,033 General Revenue Funds $ 207,656 $ 209,733 $ 211,830 $ 213,948 $ 216,087 $ 1,059,254 Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement* $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 Taos I _ County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $ 35,376 $ 36,083 $ 36,805 $ 37,541 $ 38,292 $ 184,097 Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement* $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 WardsWIle County Aid Road Trust-State Fuel Tax $ 60,679 $ 61,892 $ 63,130 $ 64,393 $ 65,681 $ 315,775 Sales Tax-1/2%Capital Improvement* $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 OATS Passenger Fares,Misc. $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000_$ 30,000 Section 5310 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 30,000 Section 5316(JARC) $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 180,000 Medicaid Transportation $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 180,000 Total Local Funds $118,033,189 Total Transportation Funds Available Note:County Aid Road Trust(CART)includes State Fuel Tax,Vehicle Sales/Use Tax and Licensing Fees. CART Funds based on 2014 numbers from MoDOT.There is a conservative two(2) Please see more on CART funds here:http://dor.mo.gov/publicreporis/index.php#motorfuel percent increase per year,based on historical numbers. *This is distributed from Cole County **Tax expires and the grant is a one-time infusion. ***Assumes sales tax renewal in November 2016 election. 6 In the past, local governments have used general revenue and other sources of revenue, as they deemed appropriate to match transportation grants awarded. It is not uncommon, nor difficult, for local jurisdictions to transfer funds from one account to another at their discretion. Table 2 shows the total programmed project funds and available project funds by source. The project costs have inflation factored in by each project sponsor. The instructions on the form used to submit a project for inclusion in the TIP reminds the project sponsor to take inflation into account when estimating the project's cost. Since the last iteration of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, the inflation factor for the TIP has been set as 3 percent. Table 2-Programmed and Available Funds by Source. _ Programmed Funds Available Funds Federal 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total FHWA NHPP $3,372,000 $1,560,000 $3,868,400 $0 $0 $8,800,400 $3,372,000 $1,560,000 $3,868,400 $0 $0 $8,800,400 FHWA HSIP $798,700 $1,688,800 $1,680,300 $1,730,700 $1,782,900 $7,681,400 $798,700 $1,688,800 $1,680,300 $1,730,700 $1,782,900 $7,681,400 FHWA STP $7,085,570 $876,400 $32,815,600 $1,127,600 $1,160,400 $43,065,570 $7,085,570 $876,400 $32,815,600 $1,127,600 $1,160,400 $43,065,570 FHWA TAP $0 $0 $0 $0_ $0 s $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s $0 FHWA SHRP2 _ $0 $0_ $0 $o_ $0 $o $0 $0 $0 to $0 $0 FHWA RTP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FTA 5307 $867,827 $893,862 $920,678 $948,298 $976,747 $4,607,413 $867,827 $893,862 $920,678 $948,298 $976,747 $4,607,413 FTA 5310 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 FTA 5311 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FTA 5316 _ $36,000 $0 $0 $0_ $0_ $36,000_ $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000 _ FTA _5329 _ $0 $0_ $0 $0 $0_ $0 $0_ $0 $0 $0 $0_ $0 FTA 5339 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000 State MoDOT MPEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 MoDOT _Safety $90,300 $189,200 $186,700 $192,300_ $198,100_ $856,600_ $90,300_ $189,200 $186,700 $192,300 $198,100_ $856,600 MoDOT State Operating $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 s $50,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000 MoDOT SWIMS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 MODOT TCOS $2,552,100 $609,100 $9,171,500 $281,900 $290,100 $12,904,700 $2,552,100 $609,100 $9,171,500 $281,900 $290,100 $12,904,700 Local Jefferson City $1,468,400 $1,141,481 $1,175,727 $1,210,999 $1,247,329 $6,243,936 $1,468,400 51,141,482 $1,175,727 $1,210,999 $1,247,329 $6,243,936 Cole County _ $360,165 $0 $0 $0 $0_ $360,165_ $360,165 $0 $0 $0 $0_ $360,165 Oats $42,000 $0 $8,000 $0 $0 s $50,000 $42,000 $0 $8,000 $0 $0 s $50,000 Holts Summit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 St.Martins $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 $1,905,000 $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 $1,905,000 Yearly Totals $17,070,063 $7,349,844 $50,257,905 $5,882,797 $6,046,576 $17,070,063 $7,349,844 $50,257,905 $5,882,797 $6,046,576 Total Programmed Total $86,607,184 Total Available Funds $86,607,184 Operations and Maintenance-MoDOT Maintenance costs include MoDOT's salaries, fringe benefits, materials and equipment needed to deliver the roadway and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as: sealing, small concrete repairs and pothole patching; mowing right of way; snow removal; replacing signs; striping; repairing guardrail; and repairing traffic signals. Performing these activities requires employees; vehicles and other machinery; facilities to house equipment and materials such as salt, asphalt and fuel. Maintenance operations expenditures are expected to increase 1% annually. In fiscal year 2016, MoDOT is budgeting $535,140,000 in maintenance expenditures that would grow to $554,874,000 in fiscal year 2021. This makes MoDOT's cost$6,913 per lane mile. Calculations are $535,140,000/77,409 lane miles of roadway. 7 Assumptions: Maintenance Operations $485,578,000 * Fleet Investments $ 22,362,000 * Facility Investments $ 7,200,000 * IS Investments $ 20,000,000 * Total $535,140,000 Lane miles 77,409 ** *Source: FY 2016 Budget Request(5-6-15) ** Source: Official 2014 State System Mileage Operations and Maintenance - Local Government Local revenue sources for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax, local sales taxes, franchise fees, license and permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that provide significant resources for local general fund and specific funding of transportation. Not all taxes and fees go to transportation, so the local jurisdiction usually will identify a budget specifically for transportation purposes, such as capital improvements, Road and Bridge funds, transit operating subsidies,road and street budgets, or operations and maintenance budgets. The operations and maintenance costs for local governments include salaries, fringe benefits, materials, and equipment needed to deliver the street and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as sealing, small concrete repairs, pothole patching, mowing, snow removal, replacing signs, striping, and repairing traffic signals. These activities may be performed in-house or outsourced. Local government operations and maintenance on federal aid roads calculated for the system wide average of operations & maintenance per centerline mile is $12,433 and $6,136 per lane mile plus 3 percent per year out to FY 2021, as determined by consultation with engineering and technical staff of the local jurisdictions. Table 3 shows the various roadway types in CAMPO's MPA and the governing body that is responsible for maintenance. 8 Table 3 -Federal Aid Road Mileage by Jurisdiction. Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Federal Percent of Other Other Minor Collector Other Minor Major Aid Total by Freeway Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Collector Highway Jurisdiction Express Arterial Arterial Miles way Callaway County 2.3 2.9 0.9 6.1 2.89% Cole County 3.6 5.9 4.6 14.1 6.63% Holts Summit 3.1 4.1 0.5 7.6 3.61% City of Jefferson* 4.3 37.4 23.6 65.3 30.83% MoDOT 34.6 8.7 18.2 11.9 5.4 5.3 32.7 116.8 55.13% Lake Mykee 0.0 0.00% St.Martins 1.5 0.5 1.9 0.91% Taos 0.0 0.00% Wardsville 0.0 0.00% Total(Functional Class) 34.6 13.0 66.1 48.8 5.4 6.3 37.8 211.9 100.00% Percent(Functional Class) 16.3% 6.1% 31.2% 23.0% 2.5% 3.0% 17.8% *Includes Parks&Rec.and Interim Source:CAMPO Functional Classification GIS Database. In addition to the local government operations and maintenance previously discussed, JEFFTRAN expenses also cover fleet repair/maintenance, repairing/replacing bus shelters, bus washing, bus maintenance facilities, public restrooms, and fuel. Table 4 shows the estimated expenditures for transit operations and maintenance. Table 4 -JEFFTRAN Estimated Expenditures for Operations &Maintenance. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 FTA-Section 5307 $893,862 $920,678 $948,298 $976,747 $1,006,049 City of Jefferson-Local Operating Assistance $1,166,009 $1,200,990 $1,237,019 $1,274,130 $1,312,354 MoDOT-State Operating Assistance $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Passenger Fares and Misc. $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 Total $2,450,871 $2,512,667 $2,576,317 $2,641,877 $2,709,403 Operations and Maintenance revenue and expenditures are based on the most recently available budgets and apply the inflation factor of 3 percent for FTA and City of Jefferson funding sources. Table 5 -OATS Estimated Expenditures for Operations &Maintenance. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 FTA-Section 5316 $36,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - FTA-Section 5310 $ 6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 Fa res $ 6,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Local Contracts $36,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Financial Constraint To exhibit financial constraint, a financial plan should address three questions: 9 1) What will the needs for transportation in the CAMPO planning area cost? The needs are identified by project in the following section and costs are summarized by funding source in Table 1. 2) What revenues are available that can be applied to the needs? Specific revenues available to meet the needs are identified in Table 1 - Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance,by jurisdiction and source. 3) Are the revenues sufficient to cover the costs? As shown in Table 2—Programmed and Available Funds by Source,programmed fund amounts equal anticipated fund amounts. For many jurisdictions as shown in Table 1, available funds exceed the amounts of revenues required to fund programmed projects. 10 Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects Bridge Projects MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA NHPP $17,000 $4,000 $4,000 $54,000 $79,000 Name: Dix Road Bridge Irrprovements N MoDOT TCOS $5,000 $1,000 $1,000 $14,000 $21,000 TIP# 2013-05 o Local _ _ $0 MDDOTtl5P3015 Other $0 Description&Location:Various types to FHWA $0 improvements to the Dix Rd.bridge over US 50. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA NHPP _ $780,000 $780,000 - Comments:Involves bridge number A1187. N MoDOT TCOS $195,000_ $195,000 Award date 2019. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,075,000 Total 022.000 $5,000 $5,000 $1,043,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,075,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA STP $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $40,000 State System Bridge Inspection F Name: N MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $10,000 TIP# 2015-03 o Local $0 MDDOTtd Other $0 Description&Location: State Bridge Inspection FHWA _ _ $0 Program for on-system bridges at various o Mo00T $0 locations throughout the MPO. w Local $0 Other $0 -C FHWA $0 Comments: N MoDOT $0 S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $50,000 Total $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $50,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 _ 2019 _ 2020 _ 2021 _ Future Totals - Project FHWA STP $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $10,000 Name: Non-State System Bridge Inspection N MoDOT TCOS $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $2,500 TIP# 2014-04 o LocalI _ _ _ _ $0 MDDOT# Other $0 Description&Location:Non-State System FHWA $0 Bridge hspection Program for off-system R MoDOT $0 bridges at various locations throughout the w Local $0 toFU Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments: N MoDOT $0 s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $12,500 amiwri Total $0 S2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $0 $12,500 Roadway Projects MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Liberty Road Intersection FHWA HSIP $56,700_ $56,700 Name: Improvements N MoDOT Safety $20,000 $6,300 $26,300 TIP# 2017-01 c Local $0 MoDOTd 5P3056 Other - $0 Description&Location:Intersection FHWA $0 improvements at Liberty Road,Jefferson City, o MoDOT $0 MO w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA HSIP $394,200 $394,200 Comments:Formerly TIP#2013-19.Award N MoDOT Safety $43,800 $43,800 Date Fall 2016. s Local _ $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $521,000 Total $20,000 $501,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $521,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA NHPP 1 $138,400 $138,400 US 50 Pavement Improvements e Name: N MoDOT TCOS $20,000 $34,600 $54,600 11P# 2017-02 o Local $0) MDDOT#5P3127 Other $0 Description&Location:Pavement FHWA $0 improvements on the eastbound and o MoDOT __ $0 •westbound lanesfrom the Moreau River at w Local $0 Jefferson City to near the Osage River. Other $0- C FHWA NHPP $2,096,800 $2,096,800 Commrents:Scoping done as 2016-06.Award N MoDOT TCOS - $524,200 $524,200 date Fall 2016. s Local $0 T Other $0 ' Total Project Cost: $2,814,000 Total $20,000 $2,794,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,814,000 11 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA STP $800 $46,400 $47,200 US 50 Outer Road Improvements e Name: N MoDOT TCOS $200 $11.600 $11,800 TIP# 2017-03 C Local $0 MODOT#15P3200 Other $0 Description&Location:Includes ramps at FHWA $0 Route 50 and Truman Blvd.Includes a portion 0 MoDOT $0 of Mssouri Blvd.,a portion of Truman Blvd., w Local _ $0 and a portion of Big Horn Dr. Other - $0 c FHWA STP $745,600 $745,600 Comments:Pavement improvements.Award N MoDOT TCOS $186,400 $186,400 date 2018. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $991,000 Total $0 $1,000 $990,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $991,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA NHPP I I $8,000 $89,600 $97,600 Name: US 54 Pavement Improvements N MoDOT TCOS $10,000 $2,000 $22,400 $34,400 11P# 2017-04 o Local $0 MODOT#5P3118 other $0 Description&Location:Eastbound and FHWA $0 westbound US 54 from near Stadium Blvd.in o MoDOT $0 Jefferson City to the Mssouri River. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA NHPP $1,458,400 $1,458,400 Comments:Award date 2018 N MoDOT TCOS .. $364,600 $364,600 s Local $0 T Other I $0 Total Project Cost: $1,955,000 Total $10,000 $10,000 $1,935,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,955,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA_NHPP $8,000 $8,000 $169,600 $185,600 US 54 Pavement Improvements E Name: N MoDOT TCOS $25,000 $2,000 $2,000 $42,400 $71,400 ErMECIEZG Local $0 MoDOT-5P3121 Other $0 Description&Location:Pavement FHWA _ _ _ - $0 improvements on the eastbound and o MoDOT $0 westbound lanes of US 54 from Route E(near w Local $0 Brazito)to near Stadium Blvd.in Jefferson City. Other $0 C FHWA NHPP $2,864,800 $2,864,800 Comments:Length:Award Date 2019 N MoDOT TCOS $716,200 $716,200 s Local _ $0 T Other I $0 Total Project Cost: $3,838,000 Total $25,000 $10,000 $10,000 $3,793,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,838,000 City of Jefferson Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Stadium&US 54 Intersection FHWA STP $289,360 $289,360 Name: ,Improvements N Mo00T $0 TIP# 2013-15 _ C Local 1/2%Sales Ta, $72,340 $72,340 MDDOT#' Local $0 Description&Location:Highway FHWA $0 54/Jefferson/Stadium Boulevard, 0 MoDOT $0 Stadium/Monroe&US 54/Christy ft.Access, w Local 1/2%Sales Ta, $100,000 $100,000 Capacity,and Safety Improvements. Local 1/2%Sales Tas $100,000 $100,000 C FHWA STP $249,170 $249,170 $498,340 Comments:Local funding is from 1/2%Jefferson City N MoDOT _ $0 Capital Improvement sales tax and Cole County 1/2% s Local 1/2%Sales Tai $360,165 $360,165 $720,330 sales tax T Local 1/2%Sales Ta, $360,165 $360,165 $720,330 Total Project Cost: $2,500,700 Total $1,531,200 $969,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,700 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Route B Pavement and Shoulder FHWA STP I I S907,200 $907,200 Name: Improvements N MoDOT TCOS $108,000 $226,800 $334,800 TIP# 2017-6 G Local $0 MDDOT#I5S3149 Other $0 Description&Location:Improvements on Route FHWA STP $23,200 $23,200 B from Lorenzo Green Dr.in Jefferson City to oR MoDOT TCOS $5,800 $5,800 Route 133 in Meta. w Local $0 Other _ $0 C FHWA STP $3,910,400 $3,910,400 Comments: Previous TIP number 2016-17,a N MoDOT TCOS $977,600 $977,600 scoping project.Award date Fall 2016. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $6,159,000 Total $108,000 . 38,0$1.000.. So $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,159,000 12 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA NHPP $28,000 $151,200 $179,200 Route J Bridge Improvements e Name: N MoDOT TCOS $7,000 $37,800 $44,800 TIP# '2017-07 G Local $0 MoDOTtd 553146 Other $0 Description&Location:Scoping for bridge FHWA $0 improvements over Route 50 near Taos.Project o M000T $o involves bridge A3200. w Local “ $0 Other $0 C FHWA NHPP $965,600 $965,600 Comrrlents:Project marked for federal N MoDOT TCOS $241,400 $241,400 oversight.Formally scoping project 2016-16. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,431,000 Total $35,000 $1,396,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1431,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Enhancement Rejects in Central FHWA STP I $4,000 I _ $4,000 Name: District N MoDOT TCOS $1,000 $1,000 11P# 2015-08 o Local $0 WIDOW OP3011 F Other $0 Description&Location:Enhancement projects FHWA $0 at various locations in the Central District. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA STP $544,000 $544,000 Comments:$1.2 million statewide transportation N MoDOT TCOS $136,000 $136,000 enhancement funds.Award Date 2017. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $685,000 _ Total $5,000 $680,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $685,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Enhancement Projects in Central ' FHWA STP $0 Name: District N M000T TCOS $0 TIP# 2017-09 c Local $0 MoDOTtd0S3017F Other $0 Description&Location: Enhancement Projects FHWA $0 at various locations in the Central District 0 MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA STP $950,400 $950,400 Comments:$1.2 million statewide transportation N MoDOT TCOS $237,600 $237,600 alternatives funds.Award Date 2017. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,188,000 Total $0 $1,188,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,188,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Enhancement Rejects in Central 1 FHWA $0 Name: ,District N MoDOT $0 TIP# 2017-10 c Local $0 MoDOTdOS3019F Other $o Description&Location: Enhancement Rejects FHWA $0 at various locations in the Central District 0 MoDOT $0 yy Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA STP $1,058,400 $1,058,400 Comments:$1.3 million statewide transportation °MoDOT TCOS $264,600 $264,600 alternatives funds.Award Date 2019. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,323,000 Total $0 SO $0 $1,323,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,323,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Enhancement Rejects in Central FHWA $0 Name: District N MoDOT $0 TIP# 2017-11 G Local $0 MoDOT#OS3020F Other $0 Description&Location: Enhancement Rejects FHWA $0 at various locations in the Central District 0 MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA STP $1,117,605 $1,117,605 Comments:$0.5 million statewide transportation N M000T TCOS $279,400 $279,400 alternatives funds.Award Date 2020. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,397,000 Total $0 $0 SO $0 $1,397,000 $0 $0 $1,397,000 13 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Enhancement Projects in Central FHWA $0 Name: District N MoDOT $0 TIP# 2017-12 G Local $0 MODOTf?053021 F Other $0 Description&Location: Enhancement Projects FHWA $0 at various locations in the Central District o MoDOT $0 w Local . $0 Other $0 C FHWA STP $1,150,400 $1,150,400 Comments:$0.5 million statewide transportation N MoDOT TCOS $287,600 $287,600 alternatives funds.Award Date 2021. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,438,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,438,000 $0 $1,438,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Various Pavement,Bridge or FHWA STP $40,000 $40,000 $1,687,200 $1,767,200 Name: Operational Improvements N MoDOT TCOS $10,000 $10,000 $421,800 $441,800 11P# 2017-19 G Local $0 MDDOTd 5P3216 Other $o Description&Location:Pavement,bridge,or FHWA $0 operational improvements at various locations o MoDOT $0 in the Central District. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA STP $25,461,600 $25,461,600 Comrrents:Aw and date 2019. N MoDOT TCOS - $6,365,400 $6,365,400 s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $34,036,000 Total $0 $50,000 $50,000 $33,936,000 $0 $0 $0 $34,036,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Various Pavement and Bridge FHWA STP $800_ $26,400 $354,400 $381,600 Name: I .rovements N MoDOT TCOS $1,000 $200 $6,600 $88,600 $96,400 ffirMECM: G Local $0 MoDOT-5S3043B Other $0 Description&Location: Pavement and bridge FHWA - _ _ $0 improvements at various routes in the Central RO MoDOT $0 District. w Local $0 Other _ $0 C FHWA STP $4,244,000 $4,244,000 Comments:Award date 2019. N MoDOT TCOS $1,061,000 $1,061,000 5 Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $5,783,000 Total $1.000 $1.000 $33,000 $5,748,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,783,000 Other Projects MoDOT Funding prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA HSIP $32,000 $4,000 $4,000 $40,000 Scoping Routes M,B&W e Name: H MoDOT Safety $8,000 $1,000 $1,000 $10,000 TIP# 2013-16 G Local _ $0 MODOTd5$2234 Other -- $0 Description&Location:Scoping for safety FHWA $0 improvements at the intersection of Route M 0 MoDOT $0 and Route Win Wardsville. w Local $o Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Anticipated federal funding category: N MoDOT $0 Safety.Future construction costs:$301,000 to S Local $0 - $1,000,000. T,Other $0 Total Project Cost: $50,000 Total $40 000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S50,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA $0 Safety Projects in Central District F Name: H MODOT $0 TIP# 2017-13 G Local $0 M:DOTfI OP3018F Other $0 Description&Location: Safety projects at FHWA $0 various locations in the Central District. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA HSIP $1,654,200 $1,654,200 Comments:$1.7 million from Statewide Open Container N MoDOT Safety $183,800 $183,800 funds.Award Date 2018.90/10 Grant/match. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,838,000 Total $0 $0 $1,838,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $1,838,000 14 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA $0 Safety Projects in Central District N MoDOT $0 TIP# 2017-14 _ o Local $0 IvbDOTfdOP3019F Other $0 Description&Location: Safety projects at FHWA $0 various locations in the Central District. o M000T $0 w Local $0 Other $0, C FHWA HSIP $1,680,300 $1,680,300 Comments:$1.7 million from Statewide Open Container N MoDOT Safety $186,700 $186,700 funds.Award Date 2019.90/10 Grant/match. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,867,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $1,867,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,867,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 — Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA $0 _ _ Safety Projects in Central District e Name: MoDOT H $0 11P# 2017-15 o Local $0 WIDOW0P3020F Other $0 Description&Location: Safety projects at FHWA $0 various locations in the Central District. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA HSIP $1,730,700 $1,730,700 Comments:$1.7 million from Statewide Open Container N MoDOT Safety $192,300 $192,300 funds.Award Date 2020.90/10 Grant/match. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,923,000 Total $0 SO So $0 $1,923,000 $0 $0 $1,923,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA $0 Safety Projects in Central District e Name: H MoDOT $0 1 G Local $0 MoDOT-OP3021 F Other $0 Description&Location: Safety projects at FHWA $0 various locations in the Central District. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 , C FHWA HSIP $1,782,900 $1,782,900 Comments:$1.7 million from Statewide Open Container N MoDOT Safety $198,100 $198,100 funds.Award Date 2021.90/10 Grant/match. S Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $1,981,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,981,000 $0 $1,981,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Guard Cable&Guardrail Repair in FHWA STP $29,600 $29,600 Name: Northern Central District N MoDOT TCOS $7,400 $7,400 TIP# 2017-17 c Local $0 IvbDOTd5P3183 Omer $0 Description&Location:Job order contracting FHWA $0 for guard cables and guardrail repair on 0 MoDOT $0 various routes in the northern portion of the w Local $0 Central District. Other $0 C FHWA STP $408,000 $408,000 Comments:Award Date Spring 2017. N MoDOT TCOS $102,000 $102 000 s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $547,000 Total $0 S547,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $547,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Chevron Installation in FHWA HSIP S30,600 $30,600 Name: Boone/Callaway Counties N MoDOT Safety S3,400 $3,400 TIP# 2017-18 G Local $0 NbDOTdd 5P3204 Other $0 Description&Location:Chevron installation on FHWA $0 various curves in Boone and Callaway o MoDOT _ _ $0 Counties. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA HSIP $282,600 $282,600 Comments:Award Date Winter 2017.90/10 N MoDOT Safety $31,400 $31,400 Grant/match. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $348,000 Total $0 $348,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,000 15 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA $0 On-call Work Zone Enforcement Name: N MoDOT $0 TIP# 2017-21 o Local $0 MoDOTtd 5P3180 Other $0 Description&Location:On-call work zone FHWA $0 enforcement at various locations in the Central o MoDOT $0 District. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA HSIP $30,600 $30,600 Comments:90/10 match,using federal and N MoDOT Safety $4,400 $4,400 MoDOT safety funds. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $35,000 Total $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA STP I $19,200 $4,000 $4,000 $27,200 Name. Scoping for Pavement Improvements N MoDOT TCOS $4,800 $1,000 $1,000 $6,800 11P# 2017-22 is Local $0 WIDOW 5P3044 Other $0 Description&Location:Scoping for pavement FHWA - $0 irrprovements on various routes in the Central 0 MoDOT $0 District. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Anticipated federal funding category:STP. N MoDOT $0 Future construction cost$15 million-$25 million. s Local $0 T Other i $0 Total Project Cost: $34,000 Total $24,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Slide Repair Scoping FHWA STP $44,000 $4,000 $4,000 $52,000 E Name: N MoDOT TCOS $11,000 $1,000 $1,000 $13,000 TIP# 2015-07 c Local $0 MoDOTtd5S3081 Other $0 Description&Location:Scoping for slide FHWA - _ $0 repairs in the northern portion of the Cental o MoDOT $o District at various locations. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Anticipated Federal Funding Category- N MoDOT $0 STP.Future construction cost$2 million-5 million. s Local $0_ T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $65,000 Total $55,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 _ 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA STP $11,200 $4,000 $4,000 $19,200 Pavement Improvement Scoping e Name: N MoDOT TCOS $2,800 $1,000 $1,000 $4,800 TIP# 2016-10 c Local $0 WIDOW/5P3045 Other $0J Description&Location:Scoping for pavement FHWA $0 improvements on various primary routes in the no MoDOT $0 Central District. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Anticipated federal funding category:STP. N MoDOT $0 Future construction cost$25 million-$50 million. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $24,000 Total $14,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 524.000 MoDOT Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project On-call Work Zone Enforcement FHWA $0 Name: N MoDOT $0 TIP# 2017-21 s Local $0 MoDOTIRP3217 Other $0 Description&Location:On-call work zone FHWA $0 enforcement at various locations in the Central o MoDOT $0 District. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA HSIP $30,600 $30,600 Comments:90/10 match,using federal and N MoDOT Safety $4,400 $4,400 MoDOT safety funds. s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $35,000 Total $0 $0 $35,000. $0 $0 $0 $0 535,000 16 ' Public Transportation Projects City of Jefferson-JEFFTRAN Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2010 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project O Other Pass.Fares $381,000 $381,000 $381,000_ $381,000 $381,000 $381,000 $2,286,000 Operating Assistance • Name: P MoDOT State Operatinc $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $60,000 TIP# 2011-04 0 Local $1,075,957 $1,108,235 $1,141,482 $1,175,727 $1,210,999 $1,247,329 $6,959,728 IVbDOT# R FTA 5307 $842,551 $867,827 $893,862 $920,678 $948,298 $976,747 $5,449,964 Description&Location:Operating Assistance FHWA $0 for JEFFTRAN service within city limits of RMoDOT $0 Jefferson Qty(A 3%annual inflation factor w Local $0 applied.) Other $0 C FHWA $0 Con'rrentS: N MoDOT $0 s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $14,755,692 Total $2,309,507 $2,367,063 $2,426,344 $2,487,405 $2,550,297 $2,615,076 $0 $14,755,692 17 Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects Forthcoming. 18 Program of Projects - OATS OATS Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project C FTA 5339 $40,000 $40,000 Capital Funding-Vehicles A Name: P MoDOT $0 T1P# 2015-01 I Local $2,000 $2,000 MoDOT#' T OATS $8,000 $8,000 Description&Location:Replacement of lift FHWA $0 equipped vehicles throughout service region. o MoDOT $0 • w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Previous TIP Number 2011-03 ° MoDOT- $0 s Local $0_ T Other $0 Total Roject Cost: $50,000 Total $0 So 00 550,000 So SO $0 $50,000 OATS Funding Prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project Section 5316 Job Access Reverse 0 FTA 5316 $60,000 $36,000 $96,000 Name: Commute P MoDOT $0 TIP# 2015-02 E Local $0 MODOT# R OATS $6,000 $36,000 $42,000 Description&Location:Operating expenses for FHWA $o service in Cole and Callaway Counties. o MoDOT $0 w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:Previous TIP Number 2011-02 ° Mo00T $0 s Local $0 T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $138,000 Total 066,000 $72.000 00 $0 S0 S0 $0 $138,000 Oats Funding prior State Fiscal Year-July 1 to June 30 Source Category Funding 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Future Totals Project FHWA 5310 $6,100 $6,000 $12,100 Section 5310 Continued Service E Name: N MoDOT $0 TIP# 2016-15 G Local $0 MDDOTSI OATS $6,100 $6,000 - $12,100 Description&Location:OATS for FTA Section FHWA _ $0 5310 funding which is for services for seniors o MoDOT $0 and people with disabilities. w Local $0 Other $0 C FHWA $0 Comments:The total grant was$119,000,but ° MoDOT $0 the rest is being used in St.Joseph and s Local $0 Columbia MO T Other $0 Total Project Cost: $24,200 Total $12,200 $12,000 $0 $0 So $0 $0 $24,200 19 Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN JEFFTRAN Program of Projects Illustrative Projects Item Description Total FTA Local 1 Replace Obsolete Lighting in Bus Barn with Energy Efficient Lighting $ 10,000 $ 8,000 $ 2,000 Update Automatic Vehicle Location(AVL)equipment,purchase Automatic Passenger 2 Counter(APC)equipment and purchase Automatic Voice Annunciation(AVA)equipment $ 275,000 $ 220,000 $ 55,000 3 Paratransit widebody cutaway bus replacement(2) $ 120,000 $ 96,000 $ 44,000 4 Upgrade/replace electronic fare card system $ 300,000 $ 240,000 $ 60,000 5 Design work for New Transit Passenger Transfer and Admin Facility $ 150,000 $ - $150,000 6 Replace outdated bus video systems $ 60,000_ $ 48,000 $ 12,000 7 Purchase new phone system $ 10,000 $ 8,000 $ 2,000 8 Replace low-floor minivan support vehicle $ 40,000 $ 32,000 $ 8,000 9 Transit facility improvements--roof and gutter replacement for CM,bus barn,wash facility $ 200,000_ $ 160,000 $ 40,000 10 Transit facility improvements--overhead doors for CM and Bus Barn $ 95,000 $ 76,000 $ 19,000 11 Repair Transfer Facility Roof& Defective Windows(Bus Shelter) $ 12,000 $ 9,600_$ 2,400 12 Security camera upgrades _ $ 20,000_ $ 16,000 $ 4,000 13 Public restroom upgrades $ 7,500 $ 6,000 $ 1,500 14 Purchase and install 4-6 bus shelters at various locations in Jefferson City $ 60,000 $ 48,000 $ 12,000 15 Purchase emergency back-up generator&switches _ $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 20,000 16 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft.electric low floor buses for 2019 delivery(2) $ 1,200,000 $ 960,000 $240,000 17 Replace current low-floor route buses with 30 ft.electric low floor buses for 2021 delivery(3) $ 1,800,000 $1,440,000 $360,000 18 Purchase Paratransit software package $ 25,000 $ 20,000 $ 5,000 19 Construct new passenger transfer and administrative facility $ 3,000,000 $2,400,000 $600,000 20 Transit training facility rehab $ 50,000 $ 40,000 $ 10,000 21 JEFFTRAN lighted signs $ 10,000 $ 8,000 $ 2,000 Transit Traveler Information System(6-Transfer facility,LU Wellness Center,Capitol Mall, 22 Both Wal-Marts,Eastland Convenient Food Mart) $ 60,000 $ 48,000 $ 12,000 23 Bike racks at passenger transfer facilities and selected bus stops $ 20,000 $ 16,000 $ 4,000 24 Security gates for transit storage,maintenance and fueling facilities $ 20,000 $ 16,000 $ 4,000 25 Inductive charging system for electric buses $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 20,000 Multimodal Projects In 2015, CAMPO met with federal and state planning partners in a formal planning process review. Within two recommendations made, CAMPO was urged to include more multi-modal projects into the TIP. CAMPO staff sent out written requests and reminders at CAMPO meetings for projects, including those not using federal dollars. As of the writing of this document,no projects have been submitted. However,there are a number of factors why these projects are limited. These types of projects are usually incorporated into new road projects. Many of these types of projects are highly dependent on grants, which may or may not be annually awarded. Projects are usually decided each budget year. There are several bicycle or pedestrian projects in the MTP illustrative list,but projects are not constrained and funds are not obligated. 20 Appendix A — Amendments and Administrative Modifications Amendments TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Board OneDOT Approval Approval TIP Amendment 1 Administrative Modifications TIP No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Date 21 Appendix B — Federal Funding Sources Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area. FHWA Program Eligible Activities National Highway Performance Program(NHPP) The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/nhpp.cfm the National Highway System(NHS),for the construction of new facilities on the NHS,and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in a State's asset management plan for the NHS. Surface Transportation Program(STP) The Surface Transportation Program(STP)provides flexible funding http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/stp.cfm that may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway,bridge and tunnel projects on any public road,pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure,and transit capital projects,including intercity bus terminals. Highway Safety Improvement Program(HSIP) Highway Safety Improvement Program(HSIP)is to support a http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/ significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads,including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal lands Transportation Alternatives Program(TAP) Funds most activities funded under the Transportation http://www.thwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/tap.cfin Enhancements,Recreational Trails,and Safe Routes to School programs under SAFETEA-LU. Railway-Highway Crossings(set-aside from HSIP) This program funds safety improvements to reduce the number of http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/ncc.cfm fatalities,injuries,and crashes at public grade crossings. FTA Programs Eligible Activities Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA)for public http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- transportation capital,planning,job access and reverse commute 21 Fact Sheet - projects,as well as operating expenses in certain circumstances. Urbanized Area_Formula_Grants.pdf Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons Individuals with Disabilities with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public 21 Fact Sheet - transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals wit complementary paratransit services. h Disabilities.pdf Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas This program provides capital,planning,and operating assistance to http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations 21 Fact Sheet - less than 50,000,where many residents often rely on public transit to _Formula_Grants_for_Rural_Areas.pdf reach their destinations. Section 5329 Transit Safety&Oversight MAP-21 grants FTA the authority to establish and enforce a new http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- comprehensive framework to oversee the safety of public 21 Fact Sheet - Transit Safety and Oversight.pdf transportation throughout the United States as it pertains to heavy rail,light rail,buses,ferries,and streetcars. Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Provides capital funding to replace,rehabilitate and purchase buses http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/MAP- and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities. 21 Fact Sheet - Bus and Bus Facilities.pdf 22 Appendix C — Policies and Procedures Amendments An amendment involves a major change to a project and requires approval by the Board of Directors and Governor. An amendment is a revision that requires public review, allowance of comment, possible re- demonstration of fiscal constraint, and includes at least one of the following: • Addition or deletion of a project using FHWA or FTA funds (except as allowed as an administrative modification), • Major changes affecting project cost from FHWA or FTA sources (changes exceeding 20% of FHWA or FTA sources of the existing project cost or changes over$2,000,000), • Major changes in a project phase initiation date(greater than 12 months), or • Major changes in design concept or design scope, such as changing project termini (more than 1/2 mile or 10% of the total length of the project, whichever is greater) or changing the number of through traffic lanes that also includes a substantial increase in Federal cost. Amendments will be initiated by the project sponsor. Amendments to delete a project can simply be made via written correspondence identifying the project and why it is to be removed from the TIP. Amendments to include a new project can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover letter or remark in the comment section requesting inclusion in the TIP as an amendment. Amendments for existing projects can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover letter or remark in the comment section highlighting the change in the project and providing the CAMPO TIP Number. After an Amendment has been requested the process as follows: • Staff will review the amendment for accuracy and to verify if an amendment is required or if the change qualifies as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary. • The amendment will be placed on the next Technical Committee(TC)meeting agenda for review. • If approval is recommended by the TC to the Board of Directors, staff will post the amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda. • At the Board of Directors Meeting, a public hearing will close the public comment period and a vote for approval will be held. If the project sponsor indicates an emergency situation upon submitting the amendment, staff will initiate the public comment period, staff will post the amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda. A public hearing will close the public comment period at the next Board of Directors Meeting and hold a vote for approval. If this is not adequate to meet the emergency situation, a special Board of Directors meeting may be called and proceed as outlined in the Public Participation Plan. 23 Administrative Modifications Revisions to the TIP and TIP projects that do not meet the criteria of an Amendment will be considered administrative modifications including: minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates. An administrative modification is a revision that neither requires committee action, public review and comment,nor redemonstrates fiscal constraint. An administrative modification will be initiated by the project sponsor by written communication to CAMPO staff describing the change (phase cost, funding sources, or phase initiation date)warranting the modification. Staff will review the administrative modification for accuracy and to verify qualification as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary. Upon CAMPO staff confirmation of the administrative modification requirements being met, staff will modify the TIP appropriately, including noting the administrative modification in Appendix A of the TIP and making changes to the project listing in the body of the TIP; notify the Board of Directors, Technical Committee, MoDOT, FTA, and FHWA via email; draft a staff memo for the next Board of Directors and Technical Committee meeting; and post the modified TIP notice on the CAMPO website for a minimum of 7 calendar days. Combining or Splitting Projects Splitting a project into two or more projects or combining two or more projects can provide benefits to project scheduling, cost, and logistics. A split or combination can be made via an administrative modification to the TIP, if the project does not trigger a major change to the project as described in the amendment section and the overall scope of work does not change. When combining two or more projects,the financial and description information will be rolled up into the project which was in the TIP originally and use the previous MPO TIP number. When splitting a project into two or more projects, the financial and descriptive information will be separated appropriately into several (two or more) projects using the same MPO TIP number, but the additional projects will include alphabetic suffixes. The process for splitting or combining projects will follow the procedures of either an amendment or administrative modification. Compliance with Metropolitan Transportation Plan For a project to be eligible for the TIP, it first must be included in the adopted Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Large capital projects, roadway capacity, and/or general purpose roadway projects must be individually listed or clearly part of a larger project included in the fiscally-constrained component of the plan. Certain projects seeking to improve safety,increase multi-modal opportunities, or enhance the existing transportation system may be programmed in the TIP without individual identification in the regional plan, so long as they are consistent with the established goals and objectives of the plan. Project Delay Policy The goal of the Project Delay Policy for the Transportation Improvement Program is to maximize the federal funding obligated each fiscal year and to enable the MPO to redirect funds to different projects if 24 any are inactive or otherwise limited from making progress. The Delay Policy applies to projects funded through the programs for which CAMPO has oversight of project selection. The intent of the Delay Policy is to provide an incentive for local agency sponsors to develop their projects according to a detailed schedule and, thereby, to obligate the federal funds assigned to each project within the timeframes initially shown in the TIP. The Delay Policy is primarily focused on projects that involve construction or provide transportation improvements that are handled through purchasing procedures. In the context of this Delay Policy, a "delay" occurs when a construction-related project phase does not get advertised within six months of the TIP program year in which its construction phase funding was originally programmed, or changed with an amendment, in the TIP. For non-construction projects and programs, a "delay" occurs when the "Notice to Proceed" is not issued within two months of the TIP program year in which its implementation was originally funded in the TIP. The consequence of a delay may be the withdrawal of its Federal funds from the TIP or other action by the Board. Project Funding Information When a new project is submitted for inclusion to the TIP, either during the initial development of the TIP or as an amendment, the project sponsor is required to provide information regarding the local funding sources in order to show fiscal constraint. The specific source of revenue, anticipated future, and any other financial information needed to show fiscal constraint will be required. Project Selection The CAMPO Board of Directors adopted (Resolution 2010-04) a project prioritization and selection process. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff and reviewed by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of approval. The Board of Directors may modify the project selection it deems necessary. Project Sponsor Commitment to Projects Project sponsors hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring that project information contained in the TIP is correct, that it accurately represents the scope of work being performed, and that the amount of funding being requested is correct. The sponsor is responsible for providing CAMPO with an honest accounting of project details including: costs, implementation schedules, and local matching fund sources, at the time of the application for federal funds and anytime such details change. The project sponsor is also responsible for reviewing the TIP after a project is included or modified to ensure correctness. Scriveners' Error Errors made the in the ministerial functions of creating and maintaining the TIP, such as cartography, typographical, spelling,minor word omissions,mathematical,and other error's which do not alter the intent of the TIP and have little or no impact can be performed by staff and shall not be considered a revision to the TIP. 25 Appendix D — Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification 26 Appendix E — Definitions Attainment area means any geographic area in which levels of a given criteria air or 2) that have been identified by the FHWA as being a Major Project. The pollutant(e.g.,ozone,carbon monoxide,PM10,PM2.5,and nitrogen dioxide)meet designated projects may include those: 1)that require a substantial amount of a the health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for that State Transportation Agency's program resources, 2) that have a high level of pollutant.An area may be an attainment area for one pollutant and a nonattainment public or congressional attention,or 3)that have extraordinary implications for the area for others. A maintenance area (see definition below) is not considered an national transportation system. attainment area for transportation planning purposes. Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) means the geographic area determined by Available funds means funds derived from an existing source dedicated to or agreement between the metropolitan planning organization(MPO)for the area and historically used for transportation purposes.For Federal funds,authorized and/or the Governor,in which the metropolitan transportation planning process is carried appropriated funds and the extrapolation of formula and discretionary funds at out. historic rates of increase are considered available.A similar approach may be used Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) means the official multimodal for State and local funds that are dedicated to or historically used for transportation transportation plan addressing no less than a 20-year planning horizon that is purposes. developed, adopted, and updated by CAMPO through the metropolitan Conformity means a Clean Air Act(42 U.S.C.7506(c))requirement that ensures that transportation planning process. Federal funding and approval are given to transportation plans, programs and Nonattainment area means any geographic region of the United States that has been projects that are consistent with the air quality goals established by a State designated by the EPA as a nonattainment area under section 107 of the Clean Air Implementation Plan (SIP). Conformity, to the purpose of the SIP, means that Act for any pollutants for which an NAAQS exists. transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations,worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The transportation Obligated projects means strategies and projects funded under title 23 U.S.C. and conformity rule (40 CFR part 93) sets forth policy, criteria, and procedures for title 49 U.S.C.Chapter 53 for which the supporting Federal funds were authorized demonstrating and assuring conformity of transportation activities. and committed by the State or designated recipient in the preceding program year, Cooperation means that the parties involved in carrying out the transportation and authorized by the FHWA or awarded as a grant by the FTA. planning and programming processes work together to achieve a common goal or Program of Projects(POP) is a list of projects to be funded in a grant application objective. submitted to FTA by a designated recipient. The POP lists the subrecipients and indicates whether they are private non-profit agencies,governmental authorities,or Coordination means the cooperative development of plans,programs,and schedules private providers of transportation service,designates the areas served(including among agencies and entities with legal standing and adjustment of such plans, rural areas),and identifies any tribal entities. In addition,the POP includes a brief programs,and schedules to achieve general consistency,as appropriate. description of the projects,total project cost,and Federal share for each project. Design concept means the type of facility identified for a transportation improvement Project selection means the procedures followed by MPOs, States, and public project(e.g.,freeway,expressway,arterial highway,grade separated highway,toll transportation operators to advance projects from the first four years of an approved road,reserved right-of-way rail transit,mixed-traffic rail transit,or busway). TIP and/or STIP to implementation,in accordance with agreed upon procedures. Design scope means the aspects that will affect the proposed facility's impact on the Public transportation operator means the public entity which participates in the region,usually as they relate to vehicle or person carrying capacity and control continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in (e.g., number of lanes or tracks to be constructed or added, length of project, accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 and 49 U.S.C.5303 and 5304,and is the signalization, safety features, access control including approximate number and designated recipient of Federal funds under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for location of interchanges,or preferential treatment for high occupancy vehicles). transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing general or Financial Plan means documentation required to be included with a metropolitan special transportation to the public,but does not include school bus, charter, or transportation plan and TIP (and optional for the long-range statewide intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation provided by transportation plan and STIP) that demonstrates the consistency between Amtrak. reasonably available and projected sources of Federal, State, local, and private Regionally significant project means a transportation project(other than projects that revenues and the costs of implementing proposed transportation system may be grouped in the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as defined in EPA's improvements. transportation conformity regulation(40 CFR part 93))that is on a facility which Financially Constrained or Fiscal Constraint means that the metropolitan serves regional transportation needs(such as access to and from the area outside transportation plan, TIP, and STIP includes sufficient financial information for the region;major activity centers in the region;major planned developments such demonstrating that projects in the metropolitan transportation plan,TIP,and STIP as new retail malls, sports complexes, or employment centers; or transportation can be implemented using committed,available,or reasonably available revenue terminals) and would normally be included in the modeling of the metropolitan sources, with reasonable assurance that the federally supported transportation area's transportation network. At a minimum, this includes all principal arterial system is being adequately operated and maintained. For the TIP and the STIP, highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer a significant alternative financial constraint/fiscal constraint applies to each program year. Additionally, to regional highway travel. projects in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas can be included in the Statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) means a statewide first two years of the TIP and STIP only if funds are available or committed. prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of four years Illustrative Project means an additional transportation project that may(but is not that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan,metropolitan required to)be included in a financial plan for a metropolitan transportation plan, transportation plans,and TIPs,and required for projects to be eligible for funding TIP,or STIP if reasonable additional resources were to become available. under title 23 U.S.C.and title 49 U.S.C.Chapter 53. Maintenance Area means any geographic region of the United States that the EPA Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a document prepared by a previously designated as a nonattainment area for one or more pollutants pursuant metropolitan planning organization that lists projects to be funded with to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,and subsequently redesignated as an FHWA/FTA funds for the at least next one-to three-year period. attainment area subject to the requirement to develop a maintenance plan under Unified Planning Work Plan(UPWP)is the management plan for the(metropolitan) section 175A of the Clean Air Act,as amended. planning program. Its purpose is to coordinate the planning activities of all Major Projects-These transportation improvements are defined as projects receiving participants in the planning process. Federal financial assistance 1)with an estimated total cost of$500 million or more 27 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization . • ..wQtiAr'v - } Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457 TO: CAMPO Technical Committee FROM: Sonny Sanders, Senior Transportation Planner DATE: April 28, 2016 SUBJECT: FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program Work continues on the FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program(UPWP). The UPWP is CAMPO's annual statement of work identifying the planning priorities and activities to be carried out for the year. The UPWP contains many ongoing activities required to perform the essential functions of CAMPO, as well as, periodic and one-time activities. In addition to adding Pavement Management as a task under Short Range Planning, the budget is the other major change to the April draft of the UPWP. Three professional services contractual work items identified in the FY 2016 UPWP are planned to span two fiscal years and are budgeted with approximately one-half the project cost in each fiscal year,FY2016 and FY2017. Due to delays in the crafting and execution of the Surface Transportation Program(STP)grant providing the majority of funds, these work items are behind schedule, with most of the work to occur in FY2017. The total cost for these activities is not increasing over the two year period, merely a shift of most of the expenditures to FY2017 is occurring. Task Budget FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Proposed Estimate for UPWP Estimated Actual UPWP Budget Contractual Budget Expenditure Amount Services Amount Travel Demand Model and List of $100,000 $50,000 $0 $100,000 Recommend Projects JEFFTRAN System-wide $75,000 $50,000 $15,000 $60,000 Assessment Long Range Visioning and Goals $50,000 $25,000 $0 $50,000 Total $225,000 $125,000 $15,000 $210,000 Staff recommends the Technical Committee review and recommend the Draft FY2017 UPWP to the Board of Directors, as submitted or with amendments, for approval. If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Sonny Sanders at 573-634- 6439 or by email at ssanders@jeffcitymo.org. Agenda Item 6B Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Unified Planning Work Program FY 2017 November 1, 2016 to October 31, 2017 Draft - Adopted, 2016 4. L ..,„:13,...rilt.; ,,,..4,„ , . si...._ .. . ....... ,.1.... , .„ ..:„. ..„ , F L li 1 • P .P , i ' 0 _ _ _ nu. ► 1111. ` / -_ liar - CAMP A Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions,findings, and conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration,or the Missouri Department of Transportation. Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits of,or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the grounds of race,color,sex,age,disability or national origin,in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987(P.L. 100.259). Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson Department of Planning and Protective Services Room 120 John G.Christy Municipal Building 320 East McCarty St.,Jefferson City,Missouri 65101 Phone: (573)634-6410 Fax: (573)634-6457 http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/long range_transportationplan/ Table of Contents Introduction 1 Challenges and Priorities 1 Transportation Planning Factors 2 Financial Support for CAMPO 2 Tasks Carried Over from FY 2016 3 Public Participation 3 UPWP Development 3 Work Element 1 -Program Support&Administration 4 Work Element 2 -General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination 5 Work Element 3 -Long Range Transportation Planning 6 Work Element 4-Short Range Transportation Planning&Programming 7 Work Element 5 -Public Transportation Planning 8 Appendix A—Financial Summary 9 Section 1 —Anticipated Expenditures 9 Section 2—Anticipated Revenue 10 Appendix B—MPO Boundary Map 11 (Resolution approving UPWP goes here) i (CAMPO Board, TC, and staff listing goes here) ii Introduction The Fiscal Year 2017 Unified Planning Work Program(UPWP)has been prepared to define the tasks and anticipate funding requirements as part for the work program for the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO). This document serves to define activities for all public officials and agencies that contribute resources to the transportation planning process. The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) covers one fiscal year, a period from November 1 to October 31 of each year, and outlines the program of transportation planning activities to be funded through the Consolidated Planning Grant and local funds. It also serves as a management tool for scheduling, budgeting, and monitoring the planning activities of the participating agencies and governments and serves as the basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of Transportation(MoDOT). CAMPO is the official Federal and State recognized Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of the Jefferson City urbanized area and the surrounding planning area. The CAMPO planning area includes a southern portion of Callaway County, northeastern portion of Cole County, cities of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, Lake Mykee, St.Martins, Taos, and Wardsville. CAMPO is responsible for transportation planning and transportation projects in a continuing, cooperative and comprehensive manner. CAMPO Staff,unless otherwise identified,performs all work. CAMPO is comprised of a Board of Directors composed of elected and appointed officials from local jurisdictions, selected state agencies, and Federal transportation representatives serving as ex-officio members; and a Technical Committee that consists of representatives from member agencies' professional staffs and acts in an advisory capacity. A memorandum of understanding between members identifies the City of Jefferson as the administrator of CAMPO, and as such, provides staffing for CAMPO. For FY 2017,the City of Jefferson will provide staff consisting of three full time transportation planners. The City also provides part time support from the Director of Planning and Protective Services and an Administrative Assistant. Challenges and Priorities The biggest challenge facing state and local transportation agencies responsible for the surface transportation system and public transit systems is finding sufficient and reliable sources of funding operations,maintaining existing systems, and implementing projects of new capacity. More fuel efficient cars and fewer vehicle miles travelled, combined with the federal fuel tax not being raised since 1997,has caused the Federal Highway Trust Fund to become insolvent and require support from general revenue fund infusions to cover shortfalls. Similar challenges are occurring at the state level. Missouri has the 46th lowest state gas tax, at$0.173 per gallon' in the nation and was last raised in 1996. Another challenge in our area is the ability to provide transportation alternatives to private vehicle ownership. Many low income or disabled citizens aren't able to drive private vehicles and rely on public transportation,walking, or biking as their primary mode of transportation. 1 American Petroleum Institute,State Motor Fuel Taxes,January,2016. http://www.api.org/'/media/Files/Statistics/StateMotorFuel-OnePagers-January-2016.pdf Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 1 Our priorities and areas of emphasis for FY 2017 include: • Increase and improve transit planning support to local transit providers. • Support of the new Mobility Coordinator for the central Missouri area. • Developing FAST Act performance measures and targets. • Metropolitan Transportation Plan update activities including continuing public participation — visioning,goals, and objectives; and travel demand model update activities. Transportation Planning Factors The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act(FAST Act),passed into law in 2015, identify planning factors required for consideration in any MPO planning activities, including in the development of the UPWP,Metropolitan Transportation Plan(MTP), and Transportation Improvement Program(TIP): (A) support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area,especially by enabling global competitiveness,productivity, and efficiency; (B) increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; (C) increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users; (D) increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight; (E) protect and enhance the environment,promote energy conservation,improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns; (F) enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight; (G) promote efficient system management and operation; (H) emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system; (I) improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and (J) enhance travel and tourism. Financial Support for CAMPO Designation as an MPO allows CAMPO to be the recipient of metropolitan planning funds from the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration of the US Department of Transportation through the Missouri Department of Transportation. Financial support to CAMPO consists of 80% federal funding through the Consolidated Planning Grant (consisting of FHWA Planning(PL) funds in the amount of$116,849 and FTA 5303 funds in the amount of$23,933), federal Surface Transportation Program(STP) funds in the amount of$226,916, and 20% in local funding provided by the City of Jefferson and Cole County. Total federal funding is 367,698 and total local funding is $91,924. The CAMPO total budget for FY2017 is $459,622. This budget includes $110,000 rolling over from the FY2016 budget due to delays initiating professional services contracts. Appendix A provides more details financial details. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 2 Tasks Carried Over from FY 2016 Three professional services contractual work items were identified in the FY2016 Unified Planning Work Program to span two fiscal years and with approximately one-half the project cost in each fiscal year, FY2016 and FY2017. These three tasks include the Travel Demand Model and List of Recommended Improvements; Long Range Transportation Goals and Vision; and the JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment. Only one of these projects is anticipated to be underway before the end of FY2016,with the other two projects commencing around the beginning of FY2017. These three projects are still planned to end in FY2017. The total cost for these activities is not increasing over the two year period, however, $110,000 of the funds for these work items will shift into the FY2017 UPWP from the FY 2016 UPWP. Developing performance measures and targets, from Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning, originally planned to commence in FY2016, is anticipated to commence in FY2017 due to the final statewide and metropolitan planning final rules not being published until May 2016. MoDOT has 18 months from the publishing of the FHWA finals rules to have their measures in place and CAMPO has an additionial 6 months from MoDOT's measures being in place. Public Participation Federal law requires CAMPO to develop a public involvement program to involve the community early and continuously in the transportation planning process. A proactive public program which provides information, timely public notice, and public access to key decisions is included in the Public Participation Plan. During the development of the 2017 UPWP, the UPWP is scheduled to be discussed at monthly Board of Directors and Technical Committee meetings from February to July, and concludes with a public comment period. Draft copies of the UPWP as part of the meeting agendas and meeting minutes regarding UPWP development are available to view on the website. UPWP Development This UPWP was developed following the guidelines found Chapter II Metropolitan Transportation Planning, Appendix A, and Appendix B of FTA C 8100.1C, 9/1/2008. CAMPO staff reviewed previous years' time required for activities to determine time allocations for this UPWP. CAMPO is administered by the City of Jefferson Planning and Protective Services Department. Because of this fact, CAMPO accommodates the city's budgeting process/schedule and execution of the CPG and must begin the development of the UPWP several months prior to the fiscal year for which the UPWP covers and present a draft to the Board of Directors a few months prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. This early start presents difficulties in assuming future tasks which may surface after adoption of the UPWP and in documenting activities occurring in the previous year. The UPWP can be modified two ways; through a modification in the `scope of work' which allows for changes in tasks to be performed, or through an amendment process, which also allows for a change in tasks, but with changes in the total amount of reimbursement agreed upon between the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission and CAMPO. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 3 Work Element 1 - Program Support & Administration Purpose The Program Support & Administration task covers the activities necessary to carry out the daily activities of CAMPO in support of the transportation planning process. These include meeting preparation, UPWP development, public outreach activities, reporting, and professional development activities. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Board of Directors and Technical Committee monthly meetings were held,with a few cancellations in FY 2016. The UPWP, quarterly progress reports, Annual Listing of Obligated Projects, DBE Commitments Semi-Annual reports. and other required reporting documents were produced in a timely manner. Staff participated in various professional development activities, including MoDOT sponsored events, webinars,and other training opportunities. CAMPO increased staff to three full time planners. Objectives/Activities • Manage CAMPO activities in order to comply with Federal and State administrative requirements and guidance. Support the operations of the Board of Directors and Technical Committee, communicate and coordinate with Federal and State agencies on MPO activities, and support day to day operations. • Develop the annual budget and Unified Planning Work Program along with the preparation and submittal of UPWP quarterly progress reports, billings, and invoices. Modify UPWP as needed and approval from the necessary authority. • Conduct public participation such as public meetings,hearings and workshops, as needed and in accordance with the Public Participation Plan. Provide access to CAMPO activities through maintenance and updating of the CAMPO website. • Fulfill reporting requirements related to Title VI, Disadvantage Business Enterprise requirements,project obligation, and other topics as required. • Professional Development activities, including attendance at relevant training sessions, educational seminars, meetings, and conferences. • Evaluate effectiveness of the CAMPO public participation process. Products for FY 2017 • Board of Directors and Technical Committee meetings. • Meeting agendas,minutes,presentations,reports, and other support material. • FY 2018 UPWP. • End of year report, quarterly progress reports,billings, and invoices. • Annual List of Obligated Projects from the previous program year. • DBE Commitments Semi-Annual reports. • Title VI Reports as required to FTA. • Update of the CAMPO Title VI Program Plan. • Participation in professional development activities. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff. Funding Sources • Local Match Funds$10,063 (20%),Federal CPG Funds $40,250 (80%). Planning Factors Addressed • A-J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 4 Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination Purpose Not all of the CAMPO member organizations have planning staff or current comprehensive planning documents in place. In order to facilitate transportation planning by incorporating the vision and goals for the member organizations and the public, CAMPO will provide assistance in the crafting of the transportation component of local comprehensive planning documents, as practical. This task may include the development and maintenance of related spatial and non-spatial data collection and analysis; examples include land use, housing, human services, environmental/natural resources, recreation/open space, and public facilities. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Provided technical assistance in various grant application processes for transportation related projects with in the CAMPO area. CAMPO staff also provided pro bono publico services such as: participation in the development of local comprehensive plans of member organizations, provided GIS analysis/data (elevations, demographic, sidewalk, bicycle facilities, street ROW, etc.) to support development, and grant application activities. Objectives/Activities • Provide technical planning assistance to CAMPO members in the development of the transportation component of comprehensive and other planning documents, including GIS support and databases. • Assist jurisdictions in the acquisition and use of GIS and other data for use in plans, transportation grant applications,measuring performance, and forecasting provided by the US Census,MoDOT and others. Products for FY 2017 • Various inputs for comprehensive planning documents-ongoing for multiple years. • Various GIS databases. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff supports local jurisdictions in the development of their plans, but the local jurisdictions have ultimate responsibility for the development and publishing of their planning documents. Funding Sources • Local Match Funds $14,729 (20%),Federal STP Funds $58,916(80%) Planning Factors Addressed • A,E, G,I and J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 5 Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning Purpose This work item is intended to provide for long range transportation planning activities, studies, and plans supporting the transportation planning process out to a minimum of 20 years, for the CAMPO metropolitan planning area, and may include both system level planning activities and project level activities. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Conducted public participation activities involving key stakeholder, business community, advocacy groups, environmental organizations, and the public in long range transportation planning activities to achieve the community's long-term transportation goals and vision for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Commenced the travel demand model project. Incorporated the the CAMPO Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan into the Metropolitan Transportation Plan as the pedestrian and bicycle component of the plan. Updated the Metropolitan Transportation Plan with projects to be included in the TIP. Objectives/Activities • Keep the MTP current by maintaining and amending components of the plan such as major land use changes, major road changes, process improvements, funding, or new regulations and legislation; and any projects to be included into the TIP that are not already listed in the MTP. • Involve key stakeholder,business community, advocacy groups, environmental organization, and the public in long range transportation planning activities to achieve the community's long-term transportation goals and vision. • Set MPO performance targets in relation to performance measures for the MTP and TIP. • Continue the update process to the Travel Demand Model and subsequent transportation study to identify areas with a low level of service and provide recommended Improvements to these areas. Products for FY 2017 • Vision, goals and perhaps strategies derived from a regional stakeholder and public involvement exercise. • Amendments to the MTP as necessary. • Develop MTP and TIP performance measures and targets. • Travel Demand Model and List of Recommended improvements. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff. • Travel Demand Model/Study-Consultant • Visioning/goals -Consultant Funding Sources • Local Match Funds $10,050(20%), Federal CPG Funds $40,200(80%) (staff) • Local Match Funds $30,000(20%), Federal STP Funds $120,000(80%) (consultant) Planning Factors Addressed • A-J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 6 Work Element 4 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming Purpose To identify and address immediate or short term transportation needs which may include non-motorized planning activities, freight planning, bicycle/pedestrian planning transportation, safety planning, operations and management planning,transportation security planning, or wayfinding activities. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Participated in activities, meetings and conferences including Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety — Central Region and STIP project review/discussions. Completed the CAMPO Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Conducted a Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Safety Assessment for Missouri Boulevard with assistance from FHWA,FTA,NHSTA, and MoDOT. Objectives/Activities • Provide support for short range transportation planning by CAMPO and its members. • Participate in regional activities regarding freight, safety, security, bicycle/pedestrian, non- motorized, and other related planning activities. • Maintain the current Transportation Improvement Program through the Amendment and Administrative Modifications process that meets statutory requirements, maintain fiscal constrain, and support changing sponsor priorities and project scope. • Develop the new Program Year 2018—2022 Transportation Improvement Program. • Participate in the development of a pavement management system for several jurisdictions in the CAMPO area,including financal support for computer software. Products for FY 2017 • Transportation Improvement Program amendments and administrative modifications as necessary. • Program Year 2018—2022 Transportation Improvement Program. • Pavement Management System. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff. Funding Sources • Local Match Funds $7,750(20%),Federal CPG Funds $31,000 (80%) (CAMPO Staff). Planning Factors Addressed • A-J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 7 Work Element 5 - Public Transportation Planning Purpose To assists public transportation and transit providers in fulfilling State, Local, and Federal requirements for coordination and cooperative transportation planning through assistance with plan development, technical assistance,mapping, data, and GIS functions. Accomplishments during Previous Work Program Period Provided assistance with the JEFFTRAN Title VI plan and updated the JEFFTRAN Route and Schedule Guide. Initiated the consultant lead system-wide assessment of JEFFTRAN. Objectives/Activities • Continue to assist JEFFTRAN with the maintaining the Route and Schedule Guide, individual route maps and other tools to serve JEFFTRAN patrons. • Provide JEFFTRAN mapping, demographic, GIS, planning and other technical assistance in support of reporting requirements and evaluating possible changes in types of transit services offered. • Develop a system-wide assessment of JEFFTRAN focusing on service goals and performance measures - perform ridership forecasting, identify transit service goals, perform existing service evaluation, develop a revised service plan and identify service needs. (2 year effort). • Participate in Mid-Missouri Transportation Coordination Council and mobility management activities. • Update of the Coordinated Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan. Products for FY 2017 • Update Route and Schedule Guide. • Maps,demographics,and GIS analytics. • Improved service to patrons of JEFFTRAN. • JEFFTRAN system-wide assessment. • Coordinated Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan. Responsible Parties • CAMPO staff. • JEFFTRAN assessment-Consultant Funding Sources • Local Match Funds $7,333 (20%),Federal CPG Funds $29,332 (80%). • Local Match Funds $12,000(20%),Federal STP Funds $48,000(80%) (consultant) Planning Factors Addressed • B -J. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 8 Appendix A- Financial Summary Section 1 -Anticipated Expenditures FY 2017 MPO Budget Federal-CPG Federal-STP Local Total Labor Salaries $90,601 $45,320 $33,980 $169,901 Benefits $27,180 $13,596 _ $10,194 $50,970 Labor Subtotal $117,781 $58,916 $44,174 $220,872 Direct Costs _ Mate rials & Supplie s Advertising $2,000 $0 _ $500 $2,500 _ Postage $320 $0 $80 $400 Printing $100 $0 $25 $125 _ Copies $40 $0 $10 $50 Office Supplies $800 $0 $200 $1,000 Food $200 $0 $50 $250 Operational Supplies $1,040 $0 $260 $1,300 Subtotal $4,500 $0 $1,125 $5,625 Other Contracted Services _ Dues&Publications $1,000 $0 $250 $1,250 Training/Education/Meetings/Conferenc( $7,000 $0 $1,750 $8,750 . Professional Services Transit Assessment $48,000 $12,000 $60,000 Travel Demand Model $80,000 $20,000 $100,000 • Visioning/Goals $40,000 _ $10,000 $50,000 Subtotal $8,000 $168,000 $44,000 $220,000 Utilitie s* Telephone $0 $0 _ $0 $0 Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment Repair and Maintenance Vehicle Wash $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance Agreement $600 $0 $150 $750 Subtotal $600 $0 $150 $750 Capital Purchases* Equipment/software(pavement mgnt.) $8,000 $0 _ $2,000 $10,000 Equipment/software(new computer) $1,900 $0 $475 $2,375 Subtotal $1,900 $0 $475 $12,375 Direct Costs Total $15,000 $168,000 $45,750 $238,750 Total Labor and Direct Costs $132,781 $226,916 $89,924 $459,622 *Note:The City of Jefferson covers all the Utility and Capital Purchases expenses,except for one computer as identifed above. *Numbers have been rounded to the nea rest whole number. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 9 Section 2-Anticipated Revenue Work Element Funding Summary-Consolidated Planning Grant and Local Funds Federal Federal Local Percent of Work Element Federal Local Match Total Work CPG Funds STP Funds Program 1-Program Support&Administration 80% 20% $40,250 $0 $10,063 $50,313 10.9% 2-General Development and Comprehensive Planning 80% 20% $0 $58,916 $14,729 $73,645 16.0% 3-Long Range Transportation Planning CAMPO Staff _ 80% 20% _ $40,200_ $0 $10,050 $50,250 10.9% Contractual Professional Service 80% 20% $0 $120,000 $30,000 $150,000 32.6% 4-Short Range Transportation Planning&Programming CAMPO Staff 80% 20% $23,000 $0 $5,750 $28,750 6.3% Contractual Professional Service 80% 20% $8,000 $0 $2,000 $10,000 2.2% 5-Public Transportation Planning CAMPO Staff 80% 20% $29,332 $0 $7,333 $36,665 8.0% Contractual Professional Service 80% 20% $0 $48,000 $12,000 $60,000 13.1% Total $140,782 $226,916 $91,924 $459,622 100% *Numbers have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 2017 Local Match by Jurisdiction Planning Funds Surface Transportation Funds Total Local Local Match Local Match Match City of Jefferson Share 75.0% $26,397 81.5% $46,229 $72,626 Cole County Share 25.0% $8,799 18.5% $10,500 $19,299 2016 UPWP Local Match $35,195 $56,729 $91,924 Note: Cole County is not providing a match to STP funds on Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning. CAMPO Staff Sonny Sanders, Senior Transportation Planner(1.0 FTE) Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner(1.0 FTE) Alex Rotenberry, Transportation Planner(1.0 FTE) Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 10 Appendix B — MPO Boundary Map CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary f Y ---Th Approved by the Board of Directors - - _ January 16,2013r I. Lake Mykse /` -_,- Approved by the Governor of Missouri (0\ March 12,2013 t lip m j Holts 5 met I I a i ..., --i--,--7---/-,...: ,1 ,4 1 F. --41114ms„.. 1111111111., l , k, _.,,;, . CI El _.- . •,j�ilr l:. ii ' 5£manins-j - � .__ - jay 1� 6� i� 01, .4 IOW 0' a - l `� \ - 7,7af Jaffaraon Z, iiciiii„,. +lkl 1 ' tl 51:'''r r 7 i id iliNi___, ,..„:1--- Pilelt:I'bk,,i.. (-7' 1 L. B I Taos I c‘•-allik 11 1 la n r c -i Legend o... .-Board Approved Planning Area Boundary r Municipal BoundaI _ ref Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY2017 Unified Planning Work Program 11 Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization anization .. jni Room 120, 320 E. McCarty St., Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573.634.6410 Fax: 573.634.6457 9'VIemoranc(um TO: CAMPO Technical Committee FROM: Sonny Sanders, Senior Transportation Planner DATE: April 28, 2016 SUBJECT: 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Update As was done in 2015, staff would like to incorporate the 2017-2021 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) into the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) as the first 5 years of the regional financial plan. The first 10 years of the MTP's regional financial plan is required to be fiscally constrained. Projects programmed in the TIP are to be derived from the MTP. Currently, the MTP lists projects that were originally inserted into the 2013-2035 MIT and projects from the 2016-2020 TIP. The MTP also includes a list of illustrative projects that would be programmed if additional resources beyond those identified in the financial plan were to become available. Please note CAMPO is not required to select any project from the illustrative list. Staff recommends the Technical Committee recommend approval of the following changes and commencement of the 25 day public comment period to the Board of Directors: • To incorporate the Program Year 2017-2021 TIP projects and financial constraint components into the current MTP; • To update the MTP illustrative list to include transit projects specifically identified in the TIP Program of Projects and the City of Holts Summit-Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Plan 2014. • Incorporation of new and updated plans for the area,by reference. Due to the size of the Draft MTP it has been placed on the CAMPO website at http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/CAMPO/2035%20MTP-revised-28apri12016.pdf If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Sonny Sanders at 573- 634-6439 or by email at ssanders@jeffcitymo.org. Agenda Item 7A Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Capital Area Metropolitan . Planning Organization Room 120. 320 E. McCarty St.. Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573.634.6410 Fax: 573.634.6457 Wlemorandfum TO: CAMPO Board of Directors FROM: Sonny Sanders, Senior Transportation Planner DATE: April 28, 2016 SUBJECT: Functional Classification Change MoDOT will discuss changes under consideration to the functional classification of US Highways within the CAMPO planning area. MoDOT is considering changing the classification from Other Principal Arterial to Expressway/Freeway on portions of US 50, US 54 and US 63 as this classification is now allowed for dual divided highways in rural areas and would provide continuity. If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Sonny Sanders at 573- 634-6439 or by email at ssanders@jeffcitymo.org. Agenda Item 7B Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Central District (Other Principal Arterials and Freeways/Expressways) 1 I ri1 i*„._ 1111 iii/lit Illir,- : -. I 0)11* 0 likli 44)1 1 91 7' °a--- rertileiliji IN gar ao II —6441111Fkalis ,41/4'..L.;' s so aprirr I om* 4"4 LW*" 4 * „... 011' III r I 14 I11 n . i lin Functional Classification ^' -INTERSTATE MAJOR COLLECTOR 'V OTHER FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY MINOR COLLECTOR `p, C -OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL LOCAL V V C MINOR ARTERIAL S Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization ° __ Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457 TO: CAMPO Technical Committee FROM: Sonny Sanders, Senior Transportation Planner DATE: April 28, 2016 SUBJECT: JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment Consultant Selection Committee Responses to the JEFFTRAN System-Wide Assessment request for qualifications have been received. The next step is to form a consultant selection committee to select the best-qualified consultant for the project. After the consultant selection is finalized, the Selection Committee will also participate in the definition of scope of services of Selection Committee participants to be recommended to the Board of Directors for consideration. If you are unable to attend the upcoming Technical Committee and desire to be considered for inclusion on the Selection Committee,or if you have any questions,please feel free to contact Sonny Sanders at 573-634-6439 or ssanders@jeffcitymo.org. If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Sonny Sanders at 573-634- 6439 or by email at ssanders@jeffcitymo.org. Agenda Item 7C Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Capital Area Metropolitan PlanningOrganization • - . Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457 TO: CAMPO Technical Committee FROM: Sonny Sanders, Senior Transportation Planner DATE: April 28, 2016 SUBJECT: Status of Current Work Tasks Staff is involved with many activities. In order to share the status of these activities to Technical Committee members not able to attend staff will begin including a memo with each meeting packet. Major active work tasks to be discussed at the May 5,2016 Technical Committee Meeting include: Travel Demand Model and List of Recommended Improvements RFQ. The LPA procurement process has begun with the draft Request for Qualifications forwarded to MoDOT for review and establishment of the DBE goal. Since both of these projects are STP funded, information regarding MoDOT's change in STP funds distribution to local jurisdictions is attached. This project will begin near the beginning of FY2017. Missouri Boulevard Safety Assessment. CAMPO, City of Jefferson, FHWA, FTA NHSTA and others will conduct a Missouri Boulevard Safety Assessment. CAMPO Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Development. An open house is scheduled for the end of May to gather more public input to aide in the development of a draft plan. A draft plan will be presented to the Pedestrian and Bicycle Steering Committee in June. If you have any questions prior to the meeting on these or other issues, please feel free to contact Sonny Sanders at 573-634-6439 or ssanders@jeffcitymo.org. Agenda Item 8A Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.