HomeMy Public PortalAbout01 January 12, 2000 CommissionRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
6727
MEETING AGENDA
TIME: 9:30 a.m.
DATE: Wednesday, January 12, 2000
LOCATION: Chancellor's Conference Room, #207
University of California @ Riverside
1201 University Avenue, Riverside 92507
Commissioners
Chairman: Jack F. van Haaster, City of Murrieta
Vice Chairman: Tom Mullen, County of Riverside
Bob Buster, County of Riverside
John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside
James A. Venable, County of Riverside
Roy Wilson, County of Riverside
John Hunt / Michael Bracken, City of Banning
Jan Leja / Brian DeForge, City of Beaumont
Robert Crain / Gary Grimm, City of Blythe
John M. Chlebnik / Gregory V. Schook, City of Calimesa
Gene Bourbonnais / Cora Sue Barrett, City of Canyon Lake
Gregory S. Pettis / Sarah DiGrandi, City of Cathedral City
Juan M. DeLara / Richard Macknicki, City of Coachella
Andrea M. Puga / Karen E. Stein, City of Corona
Greg Ruppert / Jerry Pisha, City of Desert Hot Springs
Robin ReeserLowe / Lori Van Arsdale, City of Hemet
Percy L. Byrd / Conrad Negron, City of Indian Wells
Marcos Lopez / Mike Wilson, City of Indio
John J. Pena / Ron Perkins, City of La Quinta
Kevin W. Pape / Robert L. Schiffner, City of Lake Elsinore
Frank West / Bill Batey, City of Moreno Valley
Frank Hall / Harvey Sullivan, City of Norco
Dick Kelly / Robert Spiegel, City of Palm Desert
William G. Kleindienst / Stan Barnes, City of Palm Springs
Daryl Busch / Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris
Donald F. Yokaitis, City of Rancho Mirage
Ameal Moore, City of Riverside
Patrick Williams / Chris Carlson-Buydos, City of San Jacinto
Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula
Director Stan Lisiewicz, Caltrans District #8
Eric Haley, Executive Director
Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the
Commission, please complete and submit a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Commission.
11.36.00
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
http://www.rctc.org
AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda.
Chancellor's Conference Room, #207
University of California @ Riverside
1201 University Avenue, Riverside 92507
9:30 a.m.
Wednesday, January 12, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. COMMISSIONERS SELF INTRODUCTIONS
3. PRESENTATIONS
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Items Not Listed on the Agenda).
5. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Overview
An election must be held on an annual basis for the Commission Chair and Vice
Chair positions. The Chair shall be elected by the Commission for a one-year
term and shall annually alternate between a regular member of the Commission
representing a city and a regular member of the Commission who is a member
of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. The current Chair and Vice Chair
are Commissioners Jack van Haaster (Murrieta) and Tom Mullen (County District
5), respectively.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - December 8, 1999
7. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after
making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and
that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the
posting of the Agenda. An action adding an item to the Agenda requires a 2/3
vote of the Commission, or if less than 2/3 of the Commission members are
present, a unanimous vote.)
RCTC Meeting Agenda
January 12, 2000
Page 2
8. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved
in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific
item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion
at the end of the agenda.
8A. TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM
ALLOCATIONS
Overvie w
To approve the recommended list of projects and direct staff to include
these projects in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
8B. AMENDMENT TO FY 1999 - 2000 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FOR
THE COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM AND RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES
AND REVISED LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF) AND STATE
TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA) FUND ALLOCATIONS
Overvie w
To approve: 1) An amendment to the Commuter Rail Program FY
1999-2000 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP); 2) The revision of the FY
1999/00 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) allocation to the Commuter Rail
Program; 3) The revision of the FY 1999/00 State Transit Assistance
Fund allocations in Riverside County as presented on the included in the
memorandum; and, 4) The adoption of Resolution No. 00-001, "A
Resolution of The Riverside County Transportation Commission to
Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds"
8C. LA SIERRA METROLINK STATION TEMPORARY PARKING LOT
O vervie w
To authorize staff to advertise the construction bid package for a
temporary parking lot adjacent to the existing La Sierra Metrolink Station.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
January 12, 2000
Page 3
8D. FY 2001 AND 2002 SPECIALIZED TRANSIT TWO-YEAR CALL FOR
PROJECTS
O vervie w
To authorize staff to release a two-year call for Projects for Specialized
Transit covering western Riverside County, appoint a Commission
representative to be seated on the Evaluation Committee and reserve
funding to support matching of Section 5310 federal capital grants.
8E. AWARD OF CONSULTANT CONTRACT FOR MANAGEMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF RCTC'S COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Overview
To: 1) Award a consultant contract for an 18 month period with
two -one year extension options to Inland Transportation Services, Inc. in
an amount not to exceed the negotiated price for the management and
implementation of RCTC's Commuter Assistance Program, and 2)
Authorize RCTC's Chairman to executive the agreement on behalf of the
Commission.
8F. MEASURE "A" PARK AND RIDE LEASE - LAKE ELSINORE
O vervie w
To authorize: 1) The leasing of 50 Park and Ride spaces at 17600 Collier
Avenue, Lake Elsinore, California; and, 2) RCTC's Chairman to execute
the agreement on behalf of the Commission
8G. REVIEW OF SECURITY SERVICES AND CONTINUATION OF CONTRACT
O vervie w
To approve the continuation of RCTC's contract for security guard
services with Group 70 Protective and Investigative Services through
June 30, 2000
RCTC Meeting Agenda
January 12, 2000
Page 4
8H. TRANSIT BUS TICKETS FOR COUNTY JURORS
O vervie w
Receive and file the report on Transit Bus Tickets for County Jurors
81. FY1999/2000 BEACH TRAIN PROGRAM
Overview
To approve the proposed Beach Train Program for FY 2000/01,
consisting of up to seventeen dates between June and October, including
the commitment to underwrite costs of service beyond fare revenues.
Projected revenues and expenses will be reflected in the FY 01 Budget
8J. AUDIT OF CALL BOX SYSTEM MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1998-99
O vervie w
To receive and file the Audit of Call Box System Maintenance Costs for
Fiscal Year 1998-99
8K. MONTHLY COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT
O vervie w
To receive and file the Monthly Cost and Schedule Report.
8L. CHAIR APPOINTMENT TO COMMITTEES AND AGENCY BOARDS AND
COMMITTEES
Overview
For information, presented is the list of Commissioners to Budget and
Implementation Committee, Plans and Programs Committee and other
agency committees. Requests for appointment by Commissioners to
RCTC Committees and other agency committees must be submitted to
the Clerk of the Board by Friday, January 28th. Appointment requests
will be forwarded to the Chair for action.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
January 12, 2000
Page 5
9. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BY
EMINENT DOMAIN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
O vervie w
To hold a public hearing to adopt Resolution No. 00-002, "A Resolution of the
Riverside County Transportation Commission Declaring That the Acquisition of
Fee Interests in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California,
More Particularly described as APNS 349-080-001 & 002, By Eminent Domain
is Necessary For the Construction of a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of
Greenwald/Meadowbrook Avenue and State Route 74".
10. CLOSED SESSION - Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation
Pursuant to Section 54956.9 (a)
Name of Parties: Riverside County Transportation Commission v. State of
California Department of Transportation, California Private
Transportation Company
Case Number: 336963
11. CETAP - WORKING PAPER #3 "EVALUATION OF CORRIDORS" AND
"RECOMMENDATIONS ON CORRIDORS TO MOVE FORWARD TO CETAP
PHASE II"
Overvie w
To receive and file Working Paper #3 and approve the recommendations from
the CETAP Advisory Committee on the corridors to move forward to CETAP
Phase II.
12. MEASURE "A" STRATEGIC PLAN BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND
ASSUMPTIONS
O vervie w
To 1) support full funding for the widening of State Route 91 between Mary
and Seventh Streets that is consistent with previously approved formulas for
countywide highway projects and does not exceed a total cost of $ 170.7
million (current dollars); 2) Reaffirm previously approved Commission actions
RCTC Meeting Agenda
January 12, 2000
Page 6
allocating funding for Western County highway projects while protecting and
maintaining the formula share of State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP) Dollars (currently estimated at $58 million) for countywide discretionary
needs; and, 3) Receive and file the Draft Supplemental Project Study Report on
the widening of State Route 91 between Mary and Seventh Streets in the City
of Riverside.
13. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
14. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Overview
Commissioners and the Executive Director may report on attendance of
meetings/conferences/workshops attended and issues relating to the
Commission.
15. ADJOURNMENT
The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m.,
Wednesday, February 9, 2000 in Norco. A map to the meeting site will be
included in the agenda packet.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 12, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Naty Kopenhaver, Director of Administrative Services/Clerk of the
Board
SUBJECT:
Election of Commission Chair and Vice Chair
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
To hold an election of the Chair and the Vice Chair of the Commission.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
On an annual basis, at the first meeting in January, the Commission must elect its
Chair and Vice Chair.
In accordance to the Administrative Code, the Chair shall be elected for a one-year
term and shall annually alternate between a regular member of the Commission
representing a city and a regular member of the Commission who is a member of the
Riverside County Board of Supervisors.
The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and shall exercise and
perform such other powers and duties as may be from time to time assigned to
him/her by the Commission. In any case in which the execution of a document or the
performance of an act is directed, the Chair, unless the act of the Commission
otherwise provides, is empowered to execute such document or perform such act.
The Vice Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair in his/her absence. When so
acting, the Vice Chair shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions
upon, the Chair.
Last January, the Commissioners elected Jack van Haaster (Murrieta) as its Chair and
Tom Mullen (County District 5) as its Vice Chair to preside during 1999.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
December 8, 1999
1. CALL TO ORDER.
Chairman Jack van Haaster called the meeting of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission to order at 9:30 a.m. at the UCR Chancellor's Conference Room, 1201
University Avenue, Suite 207, Riverside, California 92507.
Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent
Bob Buster
Gene Bourbonnais
Percy L. Byrd
John M. Chlebnik
Robert Crain
Juan M. DeLara
Frank Hall
John Hunt
Dick Kelly
William G. Kleindienst*
Jan Leja
Stan Lisiewicz
Robin Reeser Lowe
Ameal Moore
Tom Mullen
John J. Pena
Gregory S. Pettis
Andrea M. Puga
Ron Roberts
Greg Ruppert*
John F. Tavaglione
Jack van Haaster
James A. Venable
Frank West
Patrick A. Williams
Michael Wilson
Roy Wilson
Donald F. Yokaitis
Arrived after start of meeting
2. COMMISSIONERS SELF INTRODUCTIONS
A roundtable self introductions followed.
Daryl Busch
RCTC Minutes
December 8, 1999
Page 2
3. PRESENTATIONS
On behalf of the Commission, Eric Haley, Executive Director, recognized the 10 years of
service of Jerry Rivera as a member of Commission staff. A plaque was presented in
honor of years of service.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/S/C (Tavaglione/Venable) approve the minutes of the November 10, 1999, meeting, as
presented.
6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS.
Agenda Item No. 15, Closed Session, was moved and taken up by the Commission after
the Consent Calendar Items.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR.
M/S/C (Wilson/Hall) to approve the following Consent Calendar items.
7A. 2000 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Authorize staff to develop and forward a letter under the Chairman's signature to
request the CTC to either allow the Commission additional time to develop a 2000
STIP proposal and/or set aside the Commission's unprogrammed county shares in
the development of the 2000 STIP.
7B. 2001 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) UPDATE
Receive and file.
7C. 1999/2000 STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Approve the Draft Updated 1999/2000 RCTC/SANBAG State and Federal
Legislative Program.
RCTC Minutes
December 8, 1999
Page 3
7D. SB 45 2% PLANNING, PROGRAMMING AND MONITORING ACTIVITIES PLAN
AMENDMENT FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
1) Amend the SB 45 2% Planning, Programming and Monitoring (PPM) Activities
program for the Eastern County to adjust the PPM allocation on the Interstate 10
Lane Widening Project Study Report project from $175,000 to $199,780 ( +
$24,780) and the Palo Verde Valley Transportation Master Plan allocation from
$100,000 to $125,000 (+ $ 25,000); 2) Direct staff to seek a STIP amendment
by the California Transportation Commission to program and allocate a total of
$49,780 in PPM funds for these projects; and 3) Amend the funding agreement
between CVAG and RCTC to allow for contract award by May 31,2000.
7E. CITY OF RIVERSIDE SUBSTITUTION OF (STP) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
PROGRAM PROJECT
Approve the City of Riverside's request to reprogram funds from a traffic signal
installation at Market Street and State Route 60 to a traffic signal installation at
Van Buren Boulevard and Cleveland Avenue.
7F. CITY OF RIVERSIDE REQUEST TO EXCHANGE ISTEA STP DISCRETIONARY FUNDS
Approve the City of Riverside's request to exchange Surface Transportation
Program Discretionary funds for local Measure "A" funds on the Van Buren
Boulevard widening project.
7G. CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS FY 2000-2004 MEASURE "A" FIVE-YEAR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS
Approve the FY2000-2004 Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for
the City of Desert Hot Springs.
7H. CITY OF MURRIETA AB 1020 BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Approve the City of Murrieta's AB 1020 Bicycle Transportation Plan.
71. AWARD CONTRACT NO. RO-9952 TO PB FARRADYNE, INC., FOR PHASE I
COMMUNICATION STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A CLOSED
CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CCTV) SYSTEM FOR THE PEDLEY METROLINK STATION
1) Award Contract No. RO 9952 to PB Farradyne, Inc., for Phase I Communication
Study, in an amount not to exceed $17,000; and, 2) Authorize the use of CMAQ
funds for the Phase I work.
RCTC Minutes
December 8, 1999
Page 4
7J. RAILROAD LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RCTC AND CALTRANS FOR THE
CALTRANS PROPOSED WIDENING OF THE EASTBOUND I-215/BOX SPRINGS
OVERHEAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE SAN JACINTO
BRANCH LINE
Approve the agreement with Caltrans, subject to RCTC Legal Counsel's final review
and approval.
7K. CHANGES TO CONTRACTS RO-9337, RO-2041 AND FUNDING AUTHORIZATIONS
FOR MEASURE "A" STATE HIGHWAY 74 WIDENING BETWEEN 1-15 AND 7th
STREET NEAR THE CITY OF PERRIS
1) Authorize the re -allocation of $4,264,485 of Measure "A" funds from the
SHOPP back to the Route 74 Measure "A" widening project and direct staff to
begin negotiation of agreement(s) with State to transfer Route 74 SHOPP funds to
the Measure "A" project; 2) Approve entering into an Agreement RO-2041 for Real
Property Services with the County of Riverside General Services Agency for an
amount not to exceed $2,494,000; and, 3) Authorize that the remaining funds
from the $4,264,485, after funding the County of Riverside contract, can be used
for right-of-way acquisition.
7L. CLARIFY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-1067 FOR ROUTE 91 SOUND
WALLS, PHASE I AND PHASE II, AND AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION BIDS
1) Acknowledge and affirm that the previously approved Caltrans Construction
Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1067 for construction of the Route 91 Sound Walls,
from Magnolia to Mary Street, in the City of Riverside, is applicable to Phase I and
Phase II Sound Walls; and 2) Authorize staff to advertise for construction bids for
Sound Wall #635.
7M. QUARTERLY CALL BOX UPDATE
Receive and file.
7N. COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Direct staff to enter into contract negotiations with Inland Transportation Services,
Inc. for management of RCTC's Commuter Assistance Program.
70. CONTRACT FOR A PROGRAMMER TO MAINTAIN RCTC'S VARIOUS DATABASE
PROGRAMS
Renew the contract with Digital Advantage at the current billing rate of $50/hour -
with the total amount of contract not to exceed $20,000.
RCTC Minutes
December 8, 1999
Page 5
7P. RCTC MEETING SCHEDULE FOR YEAR 2000
Approve the schedule of RCTC Commission and Committees for the year 2000.
7Q. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
Receive and file.
7R. MONTHLY COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT
Receive and file.
7S. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT
Receive and file.
At this time, the Commission announced and adjourned to a Closed Session.
Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Pursuant to Section
54956.9. Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c). Number of potential
cases: 1
After the Closed Session, the Commission reconvened and announced that the Riverside County
Transportation Commission had authorized Legal Counsel to file a lawsuit to: 1) Halt the sale of
bonds to finance the sale of the tollroad to NewTrak; and, 2) Require Caltrans to operate the
Riverside Transition Zone in a manner consistent with the agreement between the parties.
8. 1999 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
M/S/C (Mullen/Lowe) Approve the 1999 Congestion Management Program
9. RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED PLAN - VISION STATEMENT
M/S/C (Lowe/Leja) Endorse the draft Vision Statement(s) long and summary versions of
the Riverside County Integrated Plan
10. AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. RO-9961 TO PREPARE A PROJECT STUDY REPORT FOR
STATE ROUTE 79 REALIGNMENT IN THE VICINITY OF THE CITIES OF SAN JACINTO AND
HEMET
M/S/C (Venable/Lowe) Award Contract No. RO-9961 to CH2M-Hill to Prepare a Project
Study Report for State Route 79 Realignment in the vicinity of the cities of San Jacinto
and Hemet for an amount not to exceed $730,212.
RCTC Minutes
December 8, 1999
Page 6
11. CHANGES TO MODEL RAILROAD LICENSE AGREEMENT
M/S/C (Mullen/Venable) 1) Approve the changes to the railroad license model agreement
requested by the City of San Jacinto related to liability - indemnity and assumption of
risks, except that the Commission shall not agree to protect against the acts of third
parties; 2) Approve the revised railroad license model agreement and authorize the
Executive Director, upon advice from legal counsel, to execute license agreements based
on the model; and, 3) Notify other public agencies with existing agreements of the liability
changes authorized by the Commission and offer them the opportunity to incorporate the
changes into their existing agreements with the Commission.
12. MEDIAN BARRIERS ON INTERSTATES 15 AND 215
A presentation was made by Commissioner Stan Lisiewicz showing the median barrier
projects under construction in Riverside County. Two gaps remain - one in the
Murrieta/Temecula area (approximately 8.8 mile gap north of the 21 5/1 5 split and another
shorter gap around the Sun City area. The reason for the gaps is that they do not
presently meet the criteria for installation of a median barrier. The present criteria for
installation of median barrier on a divided freeway is that the median width must be less
than 75 feet and the average daily traffic must more than 20,000. An additional criteria
is that a median barrier must meet the number of accidents (3) that could be prevented by
a median barrier within five years. However, they are currently working with Caltrans
Headquarters to get the two gaps qualified. He noted that the area must meet the
standards for median barrier to alleviate liability problems that may arose.
In response to Commissioner Bob Buster asked if there was a way that the Commission
could assist and if there were any consideration when there are differences in average
speed limits between the highways, Commissioner Lisiewicz responded that Caltrans staff
is working with Headquarters. As such, if the sections qualify as a safety projects, it will
be funded. He added that Caltrans District 8 has and continues to allocate available funds
($25 million) for median barrier projects. With regards to the speed limits, the standards
are based on the speed limits with the area.
13. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
No items were pulled from the Consent Calendar agenda..
14. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
A. Eric Haley informed the Commissioners that: 1) Paul Blackwelder has formally
announced his retirement and a retirement dinner will be held on January 20, 2000,
at the Canyon Crest Country Club; 2) It is Commissioner Jan Leja's last meeting;
3) Commissioners Greg Ruppert (Desert Hot Springs) and Mike Wilson (Indio) joins
the Commission; and, 4) Effective December 29, 1999, Hideo Sugita was
appointed as Deputy Executive Director, and Cathy Bechtel as Director of Plans
and Programs.
RCTC Minutes
December 8, 1999
Page 7
B. Commissioner Robin Lowe announced that Commissioner Ron Roberts was
appointed as Vice -Chairman of the SCAG Transportation Committee.
15. ADJOURNMENT.
The meeting was adjourned at 1 1 :25 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to
be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, January 12, 2000 at the UCR Chancellor's Conference
Room, 1201 University Avenue, Suite 207, Riverside, California 92507.
Respectfully submitted,
Naty Kopen ver
Clerk of the Board
C.01,0\kss(or.)
1 �-\ozlq g
N ARE
-(2>Ju0D,&
S�a,) i Srs2L.-L.)1c 7-
16.� d�E4_77.3
PAr/Z/ Pk inl /L L i/9 r4s
f Ale--a/1 MOO 1`2.,
J01-11Q r i -
1-Y7,01/PeZ r✓/t 1L.-1
0)414 P P
Cfie S-74-
ref /(./
CC f7 e 8o u ✓ a 11 �1 0,1 S
Jamo
Rt.> \ so R,
c, /6_ <l
Cif K
\i:\ENN
ec,
Oi fel 6! waist i
6�
R /z,, 4,
/j✓A/ a
Atez- , , //a*,,
/i%airto,tia
A/o2 C.c)
r_ge»
pNya�
CA i. rMEsA
,v�
•
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 12, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Cathy Bechtel, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Hideo Sugita, Director of Planning and Programs
SUBJECT:
Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program Allocations
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE, TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the recommended list of projects for Transportation Enhancement Activities
funds be approved as presented and direct staff to include these projects in the
Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Transportation Enhancement Activities Program (TEA) provides federal funds for
transportation related projects that enhance quality of life, in or around transportation
facilities. Projects must be over and above required mitigation and must be directly
related to the transportation system. The TEA Program apportionments parallel the
state -local split called for in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) with
the Regional Transportation Planning Agencies having responsibility for programming
75 % of the total share of funds available to the state. Approximately $13,404,000
in TEA funds are estimated to be available in Riverside County through FY 2003/2004.
At the Commission's July 1999 meeting, staff was directed to develop and release a
Call for Projects to obtain project proposals for this program. The Commission's
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was designated as the Evaluation Committee to
score the proposals and develop a recommended list of projects for the Commission's
consideration.
The TAC worked closely with staff to develop selection criteria based on the state-
wide TEA criteria. The selection criteria was reviewed by the Caltrans State TEA
Coordinator to ensure consistency with state and federal requirements. The
Commission approved the use of the selection criteria (Attachment I) at their October
1999 meeting.
A total of 39 applications from 23 local agencies were received in response to our Call
for Projects requesting a total of $27,070,667 in TEA funds. The TAC convened on
December 13, 1999 to evaluate the proposals. All applicants were invited to attend
the meeting to observe the evaluation process and answer any questions that might
be raised by the TAC. Every application was evaluated using the Commission's
approved selection criteria and scoring was done on a consensus basis by the TAC.
Twenty-one TAC members were in attendance; members abstained from evaluating
their own application.
Attachment II presents the recommending funding list. All projects are grouped by
score and listed in alphabetical order. In order to fund all projects with a score of 12
and above, the members agreed to a 4.81% reduction in TEA funding for each of the
projects. This adjustment provided funding for 24 projects from 19 local agencies.
The 4.8% reduction in TEA funding will be covered through an increase in local match
or a slight modification to the project.
The Commission's intra-county formula was adhered to by the TAC for the
recommended distribution of project funds. This distribution is as follows:
Total Available through FY 2004 (est.)
Discretionary Pot (24.2%)
Available for formula allocation:
Western County (72.23%)
Coachella Valley (26.39%)
Palo Verde Valley (1 .38(Y0)
Formula Total
$13,404,000
$ 3,243,768
$ 10,160,232
$ 7,338,736
$ 2,681,285
$ 140,211
$10,160,232
The recommended funding list allocates the discretionary funds as follows:
$1,422,264 (43.8%)for programming in the Western County, $1,765,795 (54.4%)
in the Coachella Valley, and $35,789 (1 .1 %) in the Palo Verde Valley. A total of
$19,920 (.6%) of the discretionary pot remains available in case of slight variations
in apportioned funding levels.
Staff concurs with the TAC's recommended funding list as presented.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$13,384,000
Source of Funds
Transportation Enhancement Activities Funds
(Y/IV;)
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
N/A
Year
Included in Program Budget
Year Programmed
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
ATTACHMENT 1
Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program
Call for Projects for Funds Available in FY1998-FY2004
VI. PROJECT SCORING CRITERIA
UNDER WHICH DIVISION SHOULD YOUR PROJECT BE SCORED? (Must designate only one.)
The Divisions are groupings of the 11 activity categories into four divisions with similar characteristics The
divisions are for ease ofsconng only and are not intended to affect the distribution of funds
Division A: Bicycle, Pedestrian, Abandoned Rail Right -of -Way (Categories 1,2,8)
Division B: Historic/Archaeological (Categories 3,4,6,7,10, 12)
Division C: Transportation Aesthetics and Scenic Values (Categories 3,4,5,9)
Division D: Environmental Mitigation (Category 11)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-3
1) Describe why the project is beneficial. How does the project improve overall quality -of -life, community
and/or environment? Does the project connect transportation modes or does the activity have other
multi -modal aspects? Does the project reinforce or complement the regional transportation system or fill
a deficiency in the system? (0-6 points)
2) Describe degree of regional and/or community support for the project. (0-3 points)
3) If project has in excess of the required 12% local match describe sources and commitment for the
additional matching funds. (0-3 points)
Answer the two questions that correspond to the Project Scoring Division designated above,
either Division A, B, C, or D.
DIVISION A: Bicycle, Pedestrian, Abandoned Rail Right -of -Way Projects
1) What is the need for the proposed facilities or programs? Please specify high, medium or low and explain
your answer. For example, is there a shortage of bicycle or pedestrian facilities available? Is there a
missing link in connecting the intermodal system; how important is this link? How necessary are new
facilities serving the system? (0-3 points)
} nRyKUe cie County Transportation Commission
. r,l
a
VIIIIIIIIIMENIMPNERNIEZM ,.,:;i;�„< <:.
Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program
Call for Projects for Funds Available in FY1998-FY20O4
2) Describe how the proposed project meets the needs or addresses opportunities for bicycle or pedestrian
facilities or programs. (0-3 points)
DIVISION B: Historic/Archaeological Projects
1) Specify the current recognition of historical or archaeological significance.. Please specify whether the
recognition is federal, state, local or some other measure of significance. (0-3 points)
National Register of Historic Places (Date:
State Historical Landmark (No. )
State Points of Historical Interest (No.
California Register of Historical Resources
Regional Archaeological Information Ctr (No.
Local Landmarks Program
2) How will the project enhance, preserve, or protect a historic or archaeological resource? (0-3 points)
DIVISION C: Transportation Aesthetics and Scenic Values Projects
1) How are the scenic or aesthetic resources rare, unique, or significant, or how does the potential exist for
landscaping or scenic beautification or improvements? (0-3 points)
2) How does the project preserve, rehabilitate, or develop scenic or aesthetic resources? (0-3 points)
DIVISION D: Environmental Mitigation
1) What are the environmental problems caused by the highway runoff to be mitigated? If project is to
reduce vehicle -caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity, provide specific data on
wildlife mortality, motorist issues, habitat fragmentation, etc. (0-3 points)
Riverside County Transportation Commission
5
4()0006
Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program
Call for Projects for Funds Available in FY1998-FY2004
2) How does the proposal solve the problem? (0-3 points)
VII. Please attach an 8 1/2 x 11 site map and/or photos of proposed project.
VIII. STANDARD ASSURANCES
Project Sponsoring Agency possesses legal authority to nominate transportation enhancement activity and to
finance, acquire, and construct the proposed project; and by action of an official authorized to submit the
project on behalf of the agency, authorizes the nomination of the transportation enhancement activity,
including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the person identified as the
official representative of the Sponsoring Agency to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such
additional information'as may be required.
Project Sponsoring Agency will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, rehabilitated, or
restored for the life of the resultant facility(ies) or activity. With the approval of the California Department of
Transportation, the Sponsoring Agency or its successors in interest in the property may transfer the
responsibility to maintain and operate the property.
Project Sponsoring Agency will give the California Department of Transportation's representative access to
and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the transportation enhancement
activity.
Project Sponsoring Agency will cause work on the project to be commenced within a reasonable time after
receipt of notification from the State that funds have been approved by the Federal Highway Administration
and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence.
Project Sponsoring Agency will comply where applicable with provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation, and any other federal, state,
and/or local laws, rules, and/or regulations.
I certify that the information contained in this transportation enhancement activity application, including
required attachments, is accurate and that I have read and understand the important information and agree
to the assurances on this form.
Signed Title Date
Printed (Name, Agency)
)
�Q (jl
i ide County Transportation Commission
6
FY 1997/98-2003/04 CALL FOR PROJECTS FOR TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM AMT. AVAILABLE: $13,404,000
SCORE AGENCY L
Recommended for Fundinq:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TOTAL PROJ MATCH
ORIGINAL
TEA REQ.
ADJUSTED TEA
REQUEST(.4.8%)
CUMULATIVE
ADJ TOT
W. C.172.23%1
57.338.736
C V_126.39%1
$2,681,205
PM 11 38%1
$140.211
18
Hemet
State Street Multi -Use Bicycle and Pedestrian Path
$798,000
$279,300
$518,700
$494,000
8494,000
5494,000
$0
50
18
Rancho Mirage
Hwy, 111 Meandering Bikepath and Landscaping Proj
$510,600
5178,710
$331,890
$316,000
$810,000
50
$316,000
SO
17
County
SR60 and 1-15 IC Landscaping & Scenic Beautificatio
$2,574,000
$899,000
$1,675,000
$1,595,000
$2,405,000
$1,595,000
$0
$0
17
Palm Desert
1-10/Monterey Avenue Landscape and Sculpture
$1,216,325
$616,325
$600,000
$572,000
$2,977,000
50
$572,000
SO
17
Riverside
University Ave Streetscape Enhancements
$1,100,000
$600,000
$500,000
$476,000
$3,453,000
$476,000
$0
SO
17
San Jacinto
State Street Sidewalk Improvements
$350,000
$73,500
$276,500
$264,000
$3,717,000
$264,000
50
50
16
Norco
Santa Ana River Trail -Missing Link through Norco
$500,000
$75,000
_ $425,000
$405,000
$4,122,000
5405,000
$0
$0
15
Cathedral City
Ramon Road Corridor Improvements
$831,000
$531,000
$300,000
$286,000
$4,408,000
$0
$286,000
SO
15
County
1-10/Monterey and Washington IC Landscape Beautif.
$842,424
$126,364
$716,060
$682,000
$5,090,000
$0
$682,000
$0
15
Indian Wells
Deep Cyn. Crossing Bicycle Bridge
$392,126
$64,583
$327,543
$312,000
$5,402,000
$0
$312,000
SO
15
Palm Springs
Gene Autry Trail/Ramon Rd. Median Island Landscap
$629,000
$108,188
$520,812
$496,000
55,898,000
$0
$496,000
SO
15
Perris
Restoration of Historic Santa Fe Railway Depot in Per
$431,000
$73,270
$357,730
$341,000
$6,239,000
$341,000
$0
$0
15
Rancho Mirage
Hwy. 111 Median Island Landscaping Beautification
$765,000
$420,750
$344,250
$328,000
$6,567,000
$0
$328,000
$0
14
Blythe
E. Hobsonway Pedestrian Improvements
$250,000
565,000
$185,000
5176,000
$6,743,000
$0
$0
$176,000
14
Indio
Indio Boulevard Enhancements
$1,830,000
$301,950
$1,528,050
$1,455,000
$8,198,000
$0
$1,455,000
$0
14
Murrieta
Landscape/Beautification 1-15&1-215 IC Murr H.S. Rd
$659,040
$75,592
$583,448
$555,000
$8,753,000
$555,000
50
$0
14
Riverside
Historic Victoria Parkway Restoration Project
$1,000,000
$490,000
$510,000
$486,000
$9,239,000
$486,000
50
$0
13
Caiimesa
I-10 Freeway Landscaping -Co. Line Rd -Singleton Rd
$300,000
$34,410
$265,590
$253,000
$9,492,000
$253,000
50
SO
13
Corona
Main Street Scenic Corridor Beautification
$871,000
$201,000
$670,000
5638,000
$10,130,000
$638,000
$0
$0
12
Corona
Landscape Beautification at SR91/Main St IC Ramps
$380,000
$50,000
$330,000
$314,000
$10,444,000
$314,000
$0
SO
12
Lake Elsinore
Outlet Channel Pedestrian and Bicycle Corridor
$527,800
$95,000
$432,800
$412,000
$10,856,000
$412,000
$0
$O
12
Moreno Valley
Aqueduct Bike Trail
$1,300,000
$250,000
$1,050,000
$1,000,000
$11,856,000
$1,000,000
$0
SO
12
Riverside
SR 91 Freeway/Pierce Street IC Landscaping
$400,000
$70,000
$330,000
$314,000
$12,170,000
$314,000
$0
$0
12
Temecula
Murrieta Creek Multi -Purpose Trail
$1,500,000
$225,000
$1,275,000
$1,214,000
$13,384,000
$1,214,000
$0
SO
Unfunded Projects:
11
County
French Valley Habitat Connectivity Resource Area
$3,500,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
11
County
Indian Wash Habitat Connectivity Corridor
$1,704,545
$204,545
$1,500,000
11
Moreno Valley
Village Plan Streetscape Corridor Project
$1,300,000
$250,000
$1,050,000
10
Lake Elsinore
Collier Avenue Median Landscaping
$341,004
$58,520
$282,484
10
La Quinta
Hwy. 111 Beautification Project
$3,183,903
$524,388
$2,659,515
10
La Quinta
The Village at La Quinta Streetscape Improvements
$917,109
$151,048
$766,061
10
LaQ/Indio/County
Jefferson St. Regional Landscaping/Beautification
$1,411,604
$161,911
$1,249,693
10
Rancho Mirage
Bob Hope Drive Class 1 Meandering Bikepath
$258,060
$30,967
$227,093
10
Riverside
Mitchell Avenue Multipurpose Trail
$482,300
$60,000
5422,300
9
Corona
Sidewalk Installation to Improve Accessibility
$299,987
G35,998
$263,989
9
CV Mtns Consery
Scenic Area Acquisition Project
$960,000
$560,000
$400,000
9
Perris
Rehab of Railroad Infrestr. Serving Historic Perris Dep
$1,091,000
$140,000
$951,000
8
Rancho Mirage
Rancho Mirage Entry Median Beautification Project
$463,700
$185,480
$278,220
5
Beaumont
Palm Ave Bike Lane Historic Lighting Rehab Project
$356,693
$53,504
$303,189
5
Caltrans
SR 91 Landscape Enhancement Project PM11.1-17.8
$750,000
$86,250
$663,750
TOTAL REQUESTS
$36,977,220
$9,906,553
$27,070,667
TOTAL $13,384,000 $8,761,000 $4,447,000 $176,000
DISC $-$3,223,848-$1,422,264-$1,765,795-$35,789
FORMULA $ $10,160,152 $7,338,736 $2,681,205 $140,211
7:58 AM12/15/99
N
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 12, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans and Programs Committee
Susan Cornelison, Program Manager
Stephanie Wiggins, Staff Analyst
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Amendment to FY 1999 - 2000 Short Range Transit Plan for the
Commuter Rail Program and Riverside Special Services and Revised
Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA)
Fund Allocations
PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Commission approve 1) an amendment to the Commuter Rail Program FY
1999-2000 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP); 2) revision of the FY 1999/00 Local
Transportation Fund (LTF) allocation to the Commuter Rail Program; 3) revision of the
FY1999/00 State Transit Assistance Fund allocations in Riverside County as presented
on the attached table; and, 4) adopt Resolution No. 00-001 .
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The FY 2000-2006 Rail Short Range Transit Plan for Commuter Rail was approved by
the Commission at its July 14, 1999 meeting. The federal grants for the capital
projects included in the approved plan have now been submitted and will require a
local match. An additional $1,667,000 in LTF funds and $574,000 in STA funds are
required. As illustrated below, the Commuter Rail program has existing LTF and STA
funds to allocate as match to these projects.
Commuter Rail Projects Approved in FY1999/2000 SRTP Requiring Local Match
CAPITAL PROJECTS
FEDERAL
FUNDS
($000's)
LOCAL
FUNDS
($000's)
Overcrossings & Video Surveillance at La Sierra
& West Corona Metrolink Stations & Pedley
Video Surveillance
$4,140
$537
New Start - San Jacinto Line Preliminary
Engineering & Design
$496
$124
Tier II Stations - Van Buren & Corona (Federal
portion only)
$6,000
$1,580
TOTALS
$10,636
$2,241
Rail Program (5000's)
LTF
STA
Beginning Fund Balance
$ 1,608
$ 1,109
FY99/00 Apportionment
$ 5,819
$ 356
FY99/00 Allocation - Capital
(approved July 99)
$ (315)
$ 0
FY99/00 Allocation - Operating
(approved July 99)
$ (4,114)
$ 0
Subtotal
$ 2,998
$ 1,465
(Requested Allocation
$ (1,667)
$ (574)
Ending Fund Balance
$ 1,331
$ 891
In addition, the approved FY 1999-2000 Short Range Transit Plan for Riverside Special
Services included STA funding of $100,000 for the Riverside Downtown Terminal
which was omitted from the allocation table approved by the Commission at its
October 13, 1999 meeting. The revised table includes all approved STA allocations
for FY 1999-2000.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$2,341,000
Source of Funds
Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance
(Y/N)
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
N
Year
Included in Program Budget
Y
Year Programmed
1999-00
Approved Allocation
Y
Year of Allocation
1999-00
Budget Adjustment Required
Y
Financial Impact Not Applicable
Attachment A
State Transit Assistance
Fiscal Year 2000 Allocation
County
Allocation
Western
County
Bus Rail
Coachella
Valley
Palo
Verde
Valley
Current Year Allocation Requests per SRTP
Banning
$9,000
Beaumont
$145,000
Corona
$1 5,000
Commuter Rail
$574,Qp0
Riverside Special Services
Si 0,,O0
Riverside Transit Agency
$967,095_
SunLine Transit Agency
$734,000
Total Current Year Funding Requests
$2,544,095
$1,236,095
$574,000
$734,000
$0
Revised amounts in BOLD.
f Auserslbechtelcllotus199staf.w k4
15-Dec-99
RESOLUTION NO. 00-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TO ALLOCATE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is designated the regional
entity responsible for the allocation of State Transit Assistance Funds within Riverside County;
and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission has examined the Short
Range Transit Plan and Transportation Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, all proposed expenditures in Riverside County are in conformity with the
Regional Transportation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the level of passenger fares is sufficient for claimants to meet the fare
revenue requirements of Public Utilities Code sections 99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5,
and 99268.9, as applicable; and
WHEREAS, the claimant is making full use of federal funds available under the Urban
Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the sum of the claimant's allocations from the state transit assistance fund
and from the local transportation fund does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to
receive during the fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, priority consideration has been given to claims to offset reductions in federal
operating assistance and the unanticipated increase in the cost of fuel, to enhance existing
public transportation services, and to meet high priority regional, countywide, or area -wide
public transportation needs; and
WHEREAS, the public transit operators have made a reasonable effort to implement the
productivity improvements recommended pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 99244; and
WHEREAS, the claimant is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June
28, 1979 from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers or persons
operating under a franchise or license.
WHEREAS, operators are in full compliance Section 1808.1 of the Vehicle Code, as
required in Public Utilities Code section 99251.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission
to allocate State Transit Assistance Funds for FY 1999-00 as detailed in Attachment A.
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
Approved and adopted this 12th day of January, 2000.
By:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Attest:
Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the
Riverside County Transportation Commission
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 12, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
Karl Sauer, Bechtel Project Coordinator
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
La Sierra Metrolink Station Temporary Parking Lot
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize staff to advertise the construction bid package for a temporary parking lot
adjacent to the existing La Sierra Metrolink Station.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
RCTC adopted the recommendations of the Tier II Station study at the April 1999
Commission meeting. One recommendation was to provide for a temporary parking
facility at the La Sierra Metrolink Station because the current parking lot use was running
higher than 90%. The need for the temporary parking lot will be eliminated as soon as
the Van Buren Metrolink Station is constructed. In November of 1999, the Commission
awarded a Contract to Pountney & Associates for the Final Design Plans, Specifications,
and Estimate (PS&E) for a new Metrolink Commuter Rail Station adjacent to the Van
Buren/Route 91 intersection. It is anticipated that it will take approximately eighteen
months to design and construct the new Van Buren Metrolink Station. This will
necessitate a need for the temporary parking lot in the interim period of time, and perhaps
longer.
The land for the present La Sierra parking lot was leased from Riverside Community
College (RCC) in 1994 for 49 years with an option to extend for another 50 years.
Additional land would be required for the proposed temporary parking lot. At the
September 1999 Commission meeting, the Commission agreed to lease the additional
acreage for the temporary parking lot from RCC and authorized staff to proceed with the
design of a temporary parking lot. The terms of the lease stipulate that RCTC may lease
the land for free but must remove the temporary parking lot improvements prior to June
1, 2001 (90 days after termination of the agreement on February 29, 2001).
The design of the temporary parking lot is nearing completion. It is anticipated that RCC,
RCTC, and the City of Riverside will approve the temporary parking lot final plans within
the next month. The preliminary plans indicate that the temporary parking lot will
accommodate approximately 223 addition vehicles with an estimated construction cost
of approximately $150,000 to $175,000. It will take approximately two months to
construct. Staff recommends that the Commission seek bids at this time. Based on the
bid process, staff will, at a future date, seek Commission approval to award a
construction contract to the lowest responsive bidder.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$150,000 to $175,000 plus $25,000 contingency
Source of Funds
TDA
(Y/N)
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
N
Year
Included in Program Budget
N
Year Programmed
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
Y
Financial Impact Not Applicable
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 12, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans and Programs Committee
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
FY 2001 and 2002 Specialized Transit Two -Year Call For Projects
PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission authorize staff to release a two-year call for Projects for
Specialized Transit covering western Riverside County, appoint a Commission
representative to be seated on the Evaluation Committee and reserve funding to
support matching of Section 5310 federal capital grants.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Staff is requesting authorization to release a call for projects for the Western County
Measure A Specialized Transit program covering fiscal years 2001 and 2002. The
Measure A half -cent sales tax identifies 5% of annual revenues for implementation of
Specialized Transportation Programs. The Commission policy apportions 2.5% of
these funds for Commuter Assistance programs and the remaining 2.5% for
Specialized Transit programs which benefits seniors, persons with disabilities and the
truly needy. It is projected that $2.5 million will be available for programming over the
two years. Staff is requesting that $2.3 million be used for the two-year call and that
$0.2 million be set aside to support matching of Section 5310 federal capital grants
for the purchase of equipment and vehicles for the elderly and physically disabled.
The Commission has had a long-time commitment to meeting the special transit needs
for seniors and persons with disabilities through its specialized transit grant program.
In addition to traditional public dial -a -ride services, the Commission has granted funds
to non-profit agencies to provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas, for
inter -community travel, and for riders having very special transit needs. These
programs have been very successful over the years in providing improved transit
access for Western County riders. Attachment A is a historical listing of Measure A
Specialized Transit Program recipients.
Staff anticipates strong competition for funds and recommends that the review
committee consist of:
• One Representative from the Commission;
• Two Representatives from the Commission's Citizens' Advisory
Committee; and
• One Representative from an out of county agency to foster objectivity
based on an impartial perspective.
It is recommended that the priorities for funding and evaluation of applications be
based on the following criteria:
1) Support of existing Measure A funded services which, if unfunded, would
leave an area and/or special population without alternate service options;
2) Support of capital match requests (up to 20%) which aid in the purchase
of equipment serving seniors and persons with disabilities;
3) Support of existing services which offer an improved level of service
coordination and/or high level of individualized passenger assistance;
4) Support of new services which will leverage other revenue sources and
will not require long-term support from Measure A (more than the two-
year funding cycle); and
5) Support of new or expansion of existing services.
As part of the evaluation process, all service requests will be reviewed with respect
to their productivity and whether service coordination opportunities exist before a
funding commitment is recommended.
If approved, Attachment B is the proposed time line for the two-year call for projects.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$2.5 million ($2.3 million 2-year call plus
$200,000 for Section 5310
Source of Funds
Measure "A"
Included in Fiscal Year
Budget
Y
Year
Included in Program Budget
Y
Year Programmed
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
N
Will be included in FY 01 and FY 02 budget
Financial Impact Not
Applicable
Attachment A
1�
Al;f 141:Y SI IIV111 A111
A11,1,1y Lnu1115 1.01o1.06.1,!.1,1
A111,1 Valley Seoul% n11rr1 '--
IIIIn1111C;5Stlopnll RwelSnle1Aly
kale A Van 1+,81511 Sysleul Wesleln Cnllnly
I:dy ul Mt/1 mq 1:Ity ill Il.uuunq
1:11y of Ile aolnn'11 1:4y of Ileaulnul
1'aly ill Curulua---' 1 .11y (A (:(,In11a
1 anitly $e1vu.P A'S'.u1 r, 111rn1 ill Inn, pa Liul I4,1
Wes6•,o Itive,5111v 1:11u111y Itublduue Au•as
f Pivots ill Moro) Valll+y
Seuull Leulerl City 01 Modem) �
blond AII15 l'r1,le, 1
Western Coolly
1111•n 14v Valley Mahe al Le111e1 Suulllwesleul C1
MI San 11111110 AllIa,ll,o
l'a1f11e15.1111/P0'1111H 731111
11150141A 1;11:Ildlon
14efue4 8 `:er11u1 Vnlunteel5'
I5nyl,un
111vee51e1e Conllty 11e11
Cononun,ly A( -Ilan
fllvelslde Coolly (Mice of
I_due a11un
18verside 1'nuoly Sovu:e
Area 141
Rlveeselle General I1os1Mal
iwe1s11131 Sp0(lal Servl('e5
Itivc,sule 11anS11 Agency
11nl11151111• 11,111511
Mlcnl yf111, 11;
f tiver5ul1. r.uunly-
11,ue,po i.11n n1 ('unlnusslnn
11,111•41 ,11.111,,11
pl , 1.111s1srf.6',1,11 nits
Vulunlre, 1 e1111.1 ,1117,1eilei
Ilnel
Sol ,Ia1,n11n 111(.
Wedeln Cnunly
Wesloue Cuullty,
Wesleln Coolly r
Wesleln Coolly
Mnll,elal [erne( ill
Weslcul Coolly
Illy of Iflvelcnle
Weslori Catfuly
Wesleln Cuo y.
1tn, e1 6111r/1','18, •y
! 1(1n111Ke•',lt',I1 (.I,k
11,1n5pn11,1111,11 11111
101 A I_
Measure "A" Specialized Transit Program
Western County Area
FISCAL YEAR - O
DC
4
89 90
90 91
91.92
92 93
93.94
94
nnra
$30.428
$B
r
$2
$24 000
HA Pe,illey
_
$27 000
$15,840`
$1
$46154
$51.657
$15500
$100.000
$ID!
'u0ey
y $14.000
_
$2:
Area
1
nurly Al ea
$36
$1Q800
k
,
I
,
A, ea
$025
_
$43,4u8
$43,409
$152
ever'
AI e..1
`
tilf'`'
$5- 13U
1
'
$6
A
$24 550
1ma
$70 5111
$70 112
$40.
--
$23,696
515.295
$
Ira
$43.911
$11.950
$480,
$20.
(
$161
illy Arl,;l
$ In 120
520 320
4
520 320
1
$40 2511
$100 915
$95 •
512'I !
11111,II,0r1 ti
-.11'1,1
Sa 8Sn
$68.551
AM0111,11 APPROVED
95 95 96 96 97
1 073
000
5.825
589 Our
$95 111'.
740 $ 100 nail
250
, 000
.948
990
612
891
100
011
0(1
$ I8'.011
$49411
$III -IISn
Si 911'
$511 I'lu
$46 0011
$16.1 4'41
$I4.'rHi'1
f80
464 $155,18J 1323,595 1393,973 $1.319,711 51,245,1161
FN 11111111111111111111111m.1.171
$97 OW
$ I 1 2.14
$ 12 181
$98 15i
$125 0011
$: 6 04141
1021162
$200.864
$ 3.4811
$ 16 6811
$24 904
52'1I519
s 1.1.' nun
Situ 1n1.
S 1 251,36$
97 98
1 .' 4 1110
E 17', nor
$,r, nun
14,1 1110
$ 1011 000
98 99
512 14n
$ 1011 Olin
$'.,0 000
$4 1.1100
$1146.'1
$2 1 .1n0
$fit nun
r
C.0
11�
0
99 00 � I(1IAA
$24,100
$ t; /411 $65.480
$ 35.503
$110(00 $613$01
$i. '1111
11111
110 1100
124l).11llu g.,'.n1 nun
$!41111 $148n
$ I •11111
701/
$1 115 f0,1
$51 unit $, 1; 1100
$ 1911 nrn� — L1,1111nn
? 11 1i 9
1 1 I 1 n 1
r'
1 1,,1
11,501 811
1„ , , 1
11 11 11.11
$112.329
$107,181
1402,327
1814.010
$102 350
1136.557
$16 BOO
1925
$1 450,731
$ 7,985
$6.948
$19.050
$24.550
1170 748
1131,481
1 1110.574
$ 2n O
$ If, 000
!. I. 11 unr1� 11 n4,5 9(15
'11,1111111, 11. 14 181
$ i-051 0211 $9 /89.312
•
•
C.C. 41:1,.i1/41C.111 p
TASK
Measure A
Specialized Transit
FY00-02 Call for Projects
TIMELINE
DATE
CAC Meeting
Budget & Implementation Mtg
Approval of Call by RCTC Board
Release Call for Projects
Responses to Call are Due
Review Responses
Budget 8 Implementation Mtg
Approval of Grants by RCTC
Grants Awarded
Dec-99 I Jan-00 1 Feb-00 1 Mar-00 I Apr-00 1 May-00
20
20
12
14
28
6-10
V
12
•
- 1)00(1266
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 12, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Marilyn Williams, Director of Regional Issues and Communications
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Award of Consultant Contract for Management and
Implementation of RCTC's Commuter Assistance Program
PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission: 1) award a consultant contract for an 18 month period with
two -one year extension options to Inland Transportation Services, Inc. in an amount
not to exceed the negotiated price as detailed on Exhibit A for the management and
implementation of RCTC's Commuter Assistance Program, and 2) authorize RCTC's
Chairman, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the
Commission.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
At its December 1999 meeting, the Commission took action to direct staff to enter
into contract negotiations with Inland Transportation Services, Inc. (ITS) for
management and implementation of RCTC's Commuter Assistance Program. Inland
Transportation Services, Inc. was the successful bidder in response to an RCTC
request for proposal (RFP) issued for consultant services. The RFP was mailed to 77
consultants throughout the four county region. A pre -bid meeting was held for
interested bidders during which the RFP and its requirements were reviewed in detail
as well as RCTC's contract requirements and office space/equipment options. Oral
questions were responded to as no written questions were received by the deadline.
Two bids were submitted in response to the RFP including Inland Transportation
Services, Inc. (Rancho Cucamonga) and Sundstrom Rising (Alta Loma). A technical
staff panel was convened to rate the proposals including representatives from:
❑ Southern California Rideshare
❑ Caltrans, District #8
❑ San Bernardino Associated Governments
❑ Riverside County Transportation Commission
The technical panel reviewed and rated each proposal based on the established 100
point evaluation criteria as defined in the RFP including:
1. Qualifications of key personnel 25 points
2. Work Plan 25 points
3. Cost proposal 25 points
4. Qualifications of the firm/team 15 points
5. Responsiveness to the RFP 10 points
Each rater submitted individual score sheets for the two proposals and provided
written and verbal comments regarding their assessment and overall ranking. All four
evaluators rated the two proposals in the same order. The scores were averaged
resulting in the following ranking: 1) Inland Transportation Services, Inc., and 2)
Sundstrom Rising.
Based on the RFP technical ratings and given that Inland Transportations Services, Inc.
has, on a consultant basis, professionally managed the Commuter Assistance Program
for a number of years, staff is seeking Commission approval to execute an agreement
with ITS based on the negotiated labor rates and hours as summarized on Exhibit A
to deliver a scope of services which is detailed by project and sets specific
performance goals. The Commission's labor and expense costs for the 18 month
period total $693,854, averaging $38,547 per month.
RCTC's Commuter Assistance Program is primarily funded by Measure A and
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality sources although grant funds such as SB 836
or Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) are occasionally
acquire for demonstration projects. Funds to support the contract period of January
1, 1999 to June 30, 2000 were approved as part of RCTC's FY 99-00 budget. Funds
to support the balance of the 18 month contract from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001
will be approved as part of the Commission's upcoming budget process.
Also included in the consultant agreement will be work to be performed on behalf of
San Bernardino Associated Governments who contracts with RCTC to manage and
implement their "sister" Commuter Assistance Program as part of the two agencies
long standing efforts to deliver coordinated rideshare services to commuters and
employers within the Inland Empire.
EXHIBIT A
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SUMMARY OF NEGOTIATED COSTS FOR
INLAND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. CONSULTANT SERVICES
RCTC PROJECTS
PROGRAM/GOAL(S)
TOTAL
HOURS
TOTAL
CONSULTING
COSTS
TOTAL
CONSULTING
EXPENSES
TOTAL ALL
COSTS
Advantage Rideshare In County
Goal: 750 Vehicles Reduced
3,415
$167,692
$3,300
$170,992
Advantage Rideshare Out of County
Goal: 50 Vehicles Reduced
359
$17,021
$1,000
$18,021
Club Ride
Goal: 2,225 Members
3,360
$156,129
$3,800
$159, 929
ICES - Riverside
Goal: 80 Employers Representing
143 Work Sites
4,325
$232,521
$5,250
$237,771
Commuter Exchange
Goal: 90 Visits
1,920
$79,616
$2,025
$81,641
Special Projects
$25,000
$500
$25,500
RCTC TOTAL
13,379
$677,979
$15,875
$693,854
MONTHLY AVERAGE COST
$38,547
SANBAG PROJECTS
Option Rideshare In County
Goal: 900 Vehicles Reduced
4,035
$175,037
$3,750
$178,787
Option Rideshare Out of County
Goal: 50 Vehicles Reduced
359
$17,021
$1,000
$18,021
Team Ride
Goal: 1,410 Members
2,089
$90,999
$2,300
$93,299
ICES - San Bernardino
Goal: 125 Employers Representing
361 Work Sites
5,525
$251,973
$5,500
$257,473
Special Projects
$25,000
$500
$25, 500
SANBAG TOTAL
12,008
$560,030
$13,050
$573,080
MONTHLY AVERAGE COST $33,254
GRANT FUNDS
SB 836
Goal: 300 Vehicles Reduced
600 Members
TOTAL
1,342
$59,579
1,342
$59,579
•
$200
$59,779
$200
$59,779
GRANT FUND TOTAL
$59,779
MONTHLY AVERAGE COST $3,321
HOURLY
POSITION RATES
Program Manager $95.98
Program Administrator $44.10
Marketing Specialist $36.75
Administrative Assistant $41.45
CONTRACT
SUMMARY OF CHARGES
1 /5/00 9:22 AM
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 12, 2000
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans and Programs Committee
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Measure "A" Park and Ride Lease - Lake Elsinore
PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission authorize the leasing of 50 Park and Ride spaces at 17600
Collier Avenue, Lake Elsinore, California, and authorize RCTC's Chairman to execute
the agreement on behalf of the Commission.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Commission has a long-time commitment to meeting the needs of commuters by
leasing park and ride spaces. Providing park and ride spaces is an important
component to assist commuters in making ridesharing a habit. Caltrans has
traditionally been the agency developing and maintaining park and ride lots. However,
demand for park and rides sometimes exceeds supply. To bridge the gap, the
Commission has leased unused parking areas from property owners. This approach
allows us to meet commuters' demands while Caltrans develops permanent facilities.
If approved, the Commission's cost to lease the 50 park and ride spaces will be
$9,000 annually ($15/space times 50 spaces times 12 months). Caltrans will provide
standard liability insurance for the lot as well as all directional signage.
There are currently two park and ride lots in Lake Elsinore. Daily usage at these two
lots exceeds available paved parking on an on -going basis. Commuters have been
parking on the street or in a dirt field adjacent to the designated park and ride lots. To
accommodate the need for additional park and ride lots, program staff met with the
City of Lake Elsinore to determine the most appropriate location for an additional park
and ride site. The site selected is located at the Prime Outlets Mall adjacent to 1-15.
The General Manager from Prime Outlets has reviewed the model Park and Ride Lease
Agreement and has verbally approved leasing the site to the Commission. The
selected area is well lit and secure as Prime Outlets provides 24 hour security service
throughout the mall parking area. Attachment A is a map of the proposed site.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$9,000
Source of Funds
Measure "A"
(YIN
Included in Fiscal Year
Budget
Y
Year
Included in Program Budget
Y
Year Programmed
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
N
Financial Impact Not
Applicable
"
4 -
"
"
N e w L a k e E l s i n o r e P a r k a n d R i d e L o t
l ��
N
7 ��^
��D
\ c o
<