Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout06.02.2015 City Council Meeting PacketMEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 2, 2015 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fill out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the May 19, 2015 Special Council Meeting B. Minutes of the May 19, 2015 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve 2015-2016 Liquor License Renewals B. Approve Curb and Concrete Installation Services Agreement with Schmidt Curb Co. Inc. C. Resolution Supporting a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Clean Water Partnership Grant Application for the Ardmore Avenue Stormwater Retrofit Water Quality Improvement Project D. Resolution Approving Master Subscriber Agreement for Minnesota Court Data Services with the State of Minnesota VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Sale of $1,765,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A 1. Resolution Awarding the Sale of General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2015A, in the Original Aggregate Principal Amount of $1,765,000; Fixing Their Form and Specifications; Directing Their Execution and Delivery; and Providing for Their Payment B. Medina Golf & Country Club — General Plan PUD, CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review 1. Ordinance Amending the Villas at Medina Country Club Planned Unit Development District for the Medina Golf & Country Club 2. Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary 3. Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to Construct Certain Accessory Buildings at the Medina Golf & Country Club VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Aldi — Site Plan Review and Hardcover Variance — 3522 Sioux Drive — Public Hearing B. Highway 55/County Road 116 Intersection Layout 1. Resolution Approving the Preliminary Concept Layout for the Reconstruction of the TH 55 at CR 116/CSAH 115 Intersection IX. X. XI. C. Wright -Hennepin Electric Cooperative — Conditional Use Permit for Solar Panels — 4315 Willow Drive D. Ordinance Establishing the Villas at Medina Country Club Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District — Public Hearing 1. Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Posted 5/29/2015 Page 1 of 1 XII. ADJOURN Posted 5/1/2015 Page 2 of 2 MEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 2, 2015 7:00 P.M. Medina City Ha11 2052 County Road 24 Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fi11 out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the May 19, 2015 Special Council Meeting B. Minutes of the May 19, 2015 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve 2015-2016 Liquor License Renewals B. Approve Curb and Concrete Installation Services Agreement with Schmidt Curb Co. Inc. C. Resolution Supporting a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Clean Water Partnership Grant Application for the Ardmore Avenue Stormwater Retrofit Water Quality Improvement Project D. Resolution Approving Master Subscriber Agreement for Minnesota Court Data Services with the State of Minnesota VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Medina Golf & Country Club — General Plan PUD, CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review 1. Ordinance Amending the Villas at Medina Country Club Planned Unit Development District for the Medina Golf & Country Club 2. Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary 3. Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to Construct Certain Accessory Buildings at the Medina Golf & Country Club VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Aldi — Site Plan Review and Hardcover Variance — 3522 Sioux Drive — Public Hearing B. Highway 55/County Road 116 Intersection Layout 1. Resolution Approving the Preliminary Concept Layout for the Reconstruction of the TH 55 at CR 116/CSAH 115 Intersection IX. X. XI. XII. C. Wright -Hennepin Electric Cooperative — Conditional Use Permit for Solar Panels — 4315 Willow Drive D. Ordinance Establishing the Villas at Medina Country Club Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District — Public Hearing 1. Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS ADJOURN Posted 5/29/2015 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: May 29, 2015 DATE OF MEETING: June 2, 2015 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT A. Approve 2015-2016 Liquor License Renewals — All paperwork and fees are in order. Staff recommends approval. See attached memo. B. Approve Curb and Concrete Installation Services Agreement with Schmidt Curb Co. Inc. — The Contractor will perform curb and concrete installation services per the attached agreement for the City in 2015. Schmidt Curb Co. Inc. was the low bid on the road material bids that the City Council approved at the March 17th meeting. Staff recommends approval. See attached agreement. C. Resolution Supporting a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Clean Water Partnership Grant Application for the Ardmore Avenue Stormwater Retrofit Water Quality Improvement Project — The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the City of Medina propose to construct a water quality pond for the removal of sediment and nutrients for the Ardmore Avenue Stormwater Retrofit Improvement Project in conjunction with the Independence Beach road overlay project. Medina will need to provide a 50% grant match of $33,163 for the grant, which can be in the form of cash and cash value for in -kind services. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution and grant agreement. D. Resolution Approving Master Subscriber Agreement for Minnesota Court Data Services with the State of Minnesota — At the request of Steve Tallen, Medina's Prosecuting Attorney, and the Medina Police Department, the City will enter into a Master Subscriber Agreement for Minnesota Court Data Services for Governmental Agencies with the State of Minnesota, Office of State Court Administration. The updated agreement allows access to Court Records and Documents. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Medina Golf & Country Club General Plan PUD, CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review- At the May 19th City Council meeting, the Council tabled the application requesting that the applicant provide dormers, cupolas, window treatments, 3 % feet of river rock on the bottom on the building, and a berm to elevate landscaping. These enhancements were to be considered in exchange for the City to allow the primary metal building material. The applicant has instead provided a new building design that does not use metal. These proposed building materials are not prohibited by Section 828.04. See attached report Recommended Motion #1: Approve Ordinance Amending the Villas at Medina Country Club Planned Unit Development District for the Medina Golf & Country Club Recommended Motion # 2: Approve Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary Recommended Motion # 3: Approve Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to Construct Certain Accessory Buildings at the Medina Golf & Country Club VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Aldi — Site Plan Review and Hardcover Variance — 3522 Sioux Drive — Public Hearing - Aldi, Inc. proposes to construct a 17,825 square foot grocery store at the southeast corner of Highway 55 and Sioux Drive. The development would require the following land use approvals in order to permit the construction proposed by the applicant: 1) Variance — the applicant requests a variance to exceed the maximum of 25% impervious surface permitted in the Shoreland Overlay district of Elm Creek. 2) Site Plan Review for construction of a new commercial building. See attached report. Possible Motion #1: Refer to Planning Commission — the site plan has been amended since Planning Commission review. It is not clear whether this would change the recommendation, but the Council could refer to it in order to find out. Possible Motion #2: Direct staff to prepare documents for denial based upon the findings provided by the Planning Commission. If the City Council concurs that the variance criteria have not been met, this motion would be appropriate. Possible Motion #3: Direct staff to prepare documents for approval. Staff has provided potential conditions to the Planning Commission in case they found the variance criteria were met. These conditions are provided below for reference in case the Council finds the variance criteria have been met: 2 B. Highway 55/County Road 116 Intersection Layout — Medina representatives met with Hennepin County and MNDOT representatives on April 24, 2015 on the Highway 55/CR 116 project. Hennepin County agreed to move forward with the interim improvements this summer if Medina agreed to move forward with the full - reconstruction of the intersection in 2017. Staff informed Hennepin County that we would need to have Council approve the proposed 60% plans, layout No. 4, for the proposed project to move forward. Final plans will still need to be approved by the City Council. Staff is requesting review of the project and approval of the attached resolution. See attachments. Recommended Motion: Approve Resolution Approving the Preliminary Concept Layout for the Reconstruction of the TH 55 at CR 116/CSAH 115 Intersection C. Wright -Hennepin Electric Cooperative — Conditional Use Permit for Solar Panels — 4315 Willow Drive — Wright -Hennepin Electric Cooperative has requested a Conditional Use Permit to construct a ground mounted solar array at its property at 4315 Willow Drive. The subject property contains an existing electric substation and accessory uses including backup generators. Business development exists to the north and east. The remaining surrounding property is currently farmed but planned for future Business development. See attached report. Recommended Motion: Direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the CUP based upon the findings noted in the staff report and subject to conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. D. Ordinance Establishing the Villas at Medina Country Club Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District — Public Hearing — The City's practice is to require that homeowners' associations maintain stormwater improvements within developments. This is formalized through an agreement that is recorded against each property. Additionally, the City's practice is to establish Storm Sewer Improvement Taxing District over development sites as a "back-up plan" if the homeowner's association does not maintain stormwater improvements. The City has taken this step in all recent residential subdivisions. See attached memo, ordinance and resolution. Recommended Motion # 1: Adopt Ordinance Establishing the Villas at Medina Country Club Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Recommended Motion # 2: Adopt Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary 3 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 003162E-003175E for $48,191.95, order check numbers 42871-42920 for $327,184.81, and payroll EFT 506413-506439 for $46, 508.75. INFORMATION PACKET • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List 4 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 19, 2015 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in special session on May 19, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. at the Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN. I. Call to Order Members present: Mitchell, Cousineau, Martin, Pederson Members absent: Anderson Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, City Attorney Ron Batty, and City Planner Dusty Finke II. Pioneer Sarah Watershed Discussion Pioneer Sarah Creek Watershed Commissioner Mike McLaughlin provided an update on the commission. Mr. McLaughlin asked the City Council for the authority to vote in favor of a watershed district. He thought the option would give the City of Medina more control over who is appointed to serve on the watershed district board and a district would be more proactive on future projects. Mr. McLaughlin also thought the watershed could be set up in a modest manner to control taxpayer costs. Finally, a district could also apply for grants and other sources to pay for projects. Pat Wulff, Alternate Commissioner for Pioneer Sarah, was also frustrated with the watershed and thought it would be dollar foolish to continue in its current form. Mr. McLaughlin and Mrs. Wulff thought that the majority of residents in the Medina portion of Pioneer Sarah would support a levy increase with the change to a district. The City Council authorized Commissioner McLaughlin to vote in favor of a watershed district for the Pioneer Sarah Watershed. III. Job Creation Fund Application for InCity Farms Staff provided information on fiscal disparities, payments in -lieu, possibility of a future waiver of limitation on a private well for the site, and metering sewer/water usage. Council Members also mentioned the following items that should be addressed if the project moves forward; how a well agreement could be set up and monitored, how a reservoir or cistern could be used to help off -set peak water usage, and set up a payment in -lieu agreement to address City property taxes. Adjournment Mitchell closed the meeting at 6: 56 p.m. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Scott Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk Medina City Council Special Meeting Minutes 1 May 19, 2015 DRAFT 2 3 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 19, 2015 4 5 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on May 19, 2015 at 7:05 6 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Mitchell presided. 7 8 I. ROLL CALL 9 10 Members present: Cousineau, Pederson, Martin, and Mitchell. 11 12 Members absent: Anderson. 13 14 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer 15 Tom Kellogg, City Planner Dusty Finke, City Planning Consultant Nate Sparks, Public 16 Works Director Steve Scherer, Public Safety Director Ed Belland, and Recording 17 Secretary Amanda Staple. 18 19 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:06 p.m.) 20 21 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:06 p.m.) 22 The agenda was approved as presented. 23 24 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:07 p.m.) 25 26 A. Approval of the May 5, 2015 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 27 It was noted on page one, line 42, it should state, "...work". On page two, line 51, it 28 should state, "...unmodified objection opinion..." On page three, line 30, it should state, 29 "...that a resident could be prepaying prepay the assessment." On page three, line five, 30 it should state, "...balance has been exceeding operating receipts cover the operating 31 expenses..." On page three, line 19, it should state, "...special assessments and 32 property tax levy will fund a portion of the project debt service..." On page three, line 34, 33 it should state, "...always prepay by May 20th of this year..." On page three, line 47, it 34 should state, "...noting that although..." On page four, line 34, it should state, "...that 35 tree..." On page five, line 15, it should state, "...Shawnee Woods Road..." On page 36 five, line five, it should state, "...labeled replaced..." On page six, line 25, it should state, 37 "...referenced a prior discussion..." On page six, line 33, it should state, "...if the trail 38 were was going to be moved, they staff..." On page six, line 40, it should state, 39 "...pertaining to the trail location..." On page seven, line 19, it should state, "...should 40 the trail be relocated." On page seven, line 46, it should state, "...that it is questionable 41 if section 1306 has not provided had advanced safety as it has thwarted development." 42 On page eight, line 12, it should state, "...alternate metal building materials for the 43 maintenance facility." On page eight, line 12, it should state, "...alternate metal building 44 materials. for the new maintenance facility." 45 46 Moved by Martin, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the May 5, 2015 regular City 47 Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 48 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 May 19, 2015 1 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:12 p.m.) 2 3 A. Resolution No. 2015-39 Approvinq Off -Site Gambling Permit for the NW 4 Area Jaycees to Conduct Lawful Charitable Gambling at 500 Highway 55 5 B. Resolution No. 2015-40 Approvinq Animal Structure Setback Variance for 6 Todd and Katie Monger at 1272 Homestead Trail 7 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 8 passed unanimously. 9 10 VI. COMMENTS (7:13 p.m.) 11 12 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 13 There were none. 14 15 B. Park Commission 16 Scherer reported that the Commission will hold the park tour the following night. 17 18 C. Planning Commission 19 Planning Commissioner Murrin reported that the Planning Commission discussed a 20 variance request for 50 percent hardcover from Aldi and ultimately recommended denial 21 of the request. She stated that there was also discussion regarding the tree 22 replacement plan as it had been lacking and then the amended plan would have been 23 overplanted. She stated that the Commission was in favor of a smaller building for the 24 site with reduced parking and hardcover. She noted that there was also discussion 25 regarding access to the property and more specifically the affect that could have on the 26 Arnt property. She stated that the Commission also considered a request from Wright 27 Hennepin regarding a Conditional Use Permit for a solar garden and recommended 28 approval of that request. 29 30 Martin asked for additional information on the hardcover variance. 31 32 Murrin stated that the proposed hardcover ratio was 50 percent compared to the allowed 33 25 percent for that zoning district. 34 35 Mitchell stated that he received three calls from business people in favor of the project 36 and advised that staff is working with Aldi and an amended request will come before the 37 Council on June 2nd 38 39 Pederson stated that he also received calls of support for the project. 40 41 VII. NEW BUSINESS 42 43 A. Independence Beach Improvement Project (7:18 p.m.) 44 Johnson stated that the Council discussed the proposed improvement project at the 45 previous meeting and brought the project forward as directed. He noted that a public 46 hearing would be needed for both action items. 47 48 Batty stated that one public hearing could be held jointly for the improvement project and 49 the assessment. He explained that the first resolution would order the project and 50 suggested that a fourth item be added indicating that the project will be constructed 51 utilizing the 2015 materials bids previously accepted by the City Council. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 May 19, 2015 1 2 Mitchell opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. 3 4 Mary Lou Kunz, 2785 County Road 19, stated that she did not know about the project 5 until she received the mailing. She stated that her neighbors were unaware of the 6 project as well and wanted to learn more about the project. She stated that some of the 7 neighbors that have access to CR 19 did not receive the mailing. 8 9 Scherer explained that the residents that have access to CR 19 do not access onto 10 Lakeshore Drive and therefore will not be assessed. He advised that there were 11 neighborhood meetings and public involvement throughout the process. He explained 12 the road improvements and assessment policy. He reviewed the streets that would be 13 included in the project. 14 15 Clint Lueck, 2997 Lakeshore Avenue, questioned when the information gathering took 16 place. 17 18 Scherer estimated that the neighborhood meeting took place in March. He stated that 19 letters were sent to all affected residents. 20 21 Lueck stated that he had spent some time in Arizona and was not aware of the project 22 details. 23 24 Scherer explained that the project would simply be an overlay of the street and they 25 would attempt to correct drainage issues as they go. He stated that this will be a giant 26 improvement from what is in existence. 27 28 Lueck questioned how the assessment amount for each property owner would be 29 assessed. 30 31 Scherer explained that the project cost is split into two portions, the City and the 32 assessed portion, and the assessed portion is then split between the assessed 33 properties. 34 35 Lueck asked for additional details regarding the interest rate. 36 37 Scherer replied that the interest rate would be four percent and the assessment would 38 be split over seven years. He stated that residents can choose to pay the assessment 39 earlier if desired. 40 41 Batty explained that the letter sent to homeowners explains the two public hearing items 42 considered tonight. He advised that this project will be assessed on a per lot basis and 43 stated that homeowners have the right to appeal the assessment if desired. He stated 44 that in order to appeal the assessment, a written objection must be filed prior to the close 45 of the public hearing tonight. He stated that would preserve the right for the property 46 owner to appeal, but advised that the resident would then have to follow through with the 47 appeal process. He stated that if the Council adopts the assessment resolution tonight, 48 the assessed property owners would have a 30-day period to pay the assessment 49 without interest. 50 51 Mitchell closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 May 19, 2015 1 2 1. Resolution No. 2015-41 Approving Plans According to Feasibility 3 Report and Ordering Independence Beach Improvement Project 4 Moved by Martin, seconded by Cousineau, to approve Resolution No. 2015-41 5 Approving Plans According to Feasibility Report and Ordering Independence Beach 6 Improvement Project, with an additional paragraph four to be added stating "The project 7 will be constructed utilizing the 2015 material bids previously accepted by the City 8 Council" Motion passed unanimously. 9 10 2. Resolution No. 2015-42 Adopting Assessment Roll for Independence 11 Beach Overlay Project 12 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to approve Resolution No. 2015-42 Adopting 13 Assessment Roll for the Independence Beach Overlay Project. Motion passed 14 unanimously. 15 16 B. Mill and Paving Services Agreement with Omann Brothers, Inc. (7:38 p.m.) 17 Scherer stated that the agreement is based on the bids received and approved by the 18 City for the Independence Beach Improvement Project. 19 20 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to approve the Mill and Paving Services 21 Agreement with Omann Brothers, Inc. for the 2015 paving projects. Motion passed 22 unanimously. 23 24 Scherer stated that work will begin on the northern end working towards the park in June 25 while work on the southern half would begin later this summer. 26 27 C. Wealshire of Medina — Rezoning, Site Plan Review and Interim Use Permit 28 (7:40 p.m.) 29 Finke presented a request for a new commercial building, a 150 resident memory care 30 facility, noting that the project would begin with the first phase of 84 units. He stated that 31 the land use requests include a rezoning, Site Plan review and Interim Use Permit (IUP). 32 He stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the requests in 33 February and recommended approval. He stated that the Council should first consider 34 the rezoning request, as the Site Plan would be contingent upon that change. He stated 35 that the applicant had brought forth a Comprehensive Plan amendment previously to 36 reguide the property and advised that this step would be likely to follow in order to match 37 the guiding of the property. He stated that the proposed use would be an allowable use 38 in the requested zoning district. He stated that detailed information is included in the 39 staff report and he could answer any questions. He referenced the access to the site 40 and stated that staff does have recommendations in the case of future development and 41 recommends a petition and waiver be required for the potential future assessment 42 should the public improvement projects move forward. He referenced sewer and water 43 and stated that staff is recommending language within the development agreement 44 justifying lower connection fees based on the water usage at the applicant's other 45 facilities, with a full fee being required if actual water usage is higher. He referenced the 46 IUP request and stated that the southern portion of the lot is currently agricultural and 47 would like to remain as that use until the time of future development. He stated that staff 48 does not oppose that request as proposed. He reported that the Planning Commission 49 recommended approval of these requests subject to the conditions detailed in the staff 50 report. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 May 19, 2015 1 Pederson stated that the typical policy is the first development builds the road and 2 questioned why that is not the case in this area. He noted that staging area has been 3 shut down and did not want to see those properties assessed. 4 5 Finke stated that there are no assessments discussed for this or any properties in the 6 area as the right-of-way and ability to construct the road does not exist at this time. He 7 stated that the petition and waiver would be the best way to assess the property in the 8 future should it become a possibility to construct the road in the future. 9 10 Mitchell questioned if the numbered conditions include the language regarding the sewer 11 and water fees. 12 13 Finke stated that the language is not addressed specifically as it would be included in 14 the development agreement, which would come forward at a later date. 15 16 Martin referenced a three-foot right-of-way dedication but noted that she could not find 17 that on the plans. 18 19 Finke stated that would include Mohawk but was unsure if that would include Chippewa. 20 21 Martin stated that perhaps a right-of-way dedication along Chippewa should be included 22 in the case that the roadway can develop in the future. 23 24 Thomas Wiskow, President of the Wealshire of Bloomington, thanked the Mayor and 25 Council, Planning Commission and especially City Planner Dusty Finke and staff for their 26 cooperation and availability throughout the process. He stated that one of the biggest 27 challenges had been the 75-foot setback requirement, noting the 30 to 45 foot setbacks 28 in Rogers and Bloomington. He stated that today he has a tremendous appreciation for 29 the pastures and green space within the City. He noted that even though they had to 30 purchase additional land to meet the setback requirement he does now believe that to 31 be well worth the purchase. He stated that the building materials and landscaping 32 proposed would fit well with Medina. He stated that initially he wanted to begin building 33 in May of this year but advised that several factors delayed that construction start 34 including, an unfavorable construction environment, lack of materials because of the 35 Vikings Stadium, and additional clarity needed on the sewer and water connection fees. 36 He hoped that the City would look at the sewer and water connection fees as Finke had 37 mentioned. He stated that staff has also agreed to eliminate the park dedication fees as 38 the memory care residents would not be using the parks. 39 40 Martin clarified that park dedication would not be applicable as the property would not be 41 replatted or subdivided. 42 43 Wiskow stated that this facility does not deal with senior or assisted living and would 44 instead be dealing with high care residents that do not drive. He stated that staff 45 reduced the parking at a ratio of one stall to three residents but believed that ratio to 46 even be higher than needed. He stated that they would be doing underground parking in 47 order to preserve the green space. He also clarified the assessment period to be seven 48 years, should Chippewa develop. He stated that they will most likely exceed the 49 landscaping requirements of the City. He referenced sewer and water connections and 50 advised that they received a refund from Bloomington in regard to the connection fees 51 that had originally been charged and were reduced by the Metropolitan Council. He Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 May 19, 2015 I stated that he is excited and believes that this will be an unbelievable project for Medina 2 that will be beautiful and will bring jobs to the community. He thanked the Council and 3 the staff for their time and cooperation. 4 5 Mitchell stated that he drove to the facilities in Bloomington and Rogers and thanked the 6 applicant for being very open and accessible during the process. 7 8 Cousineau stated that this would be a great neighbor for the adjacent properties. 9 10 Moved by Martin, seconded by Cousineau, to direct staff to prepare documents 11 approving the rezoning, site plan review, and interim use permit subject to the conditions 12 recommended by the Planning Commission with the added condition that the sewer and 13 water charges be based on actual use. Motion passed unanimously. 14 15 VIII. OLD BUSINESS 16 17 A. Resolution No. 2015-43 Supporting the Job Creation Fund Application for 18 InCity Farms (8:15 p.m.) 19 Mitchell stated that the Council discussed this item at length at the work session earlier 20 in the night and were able to agree to support the grant request. 21 22 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-43 Supporting 23 the Job Creation Fund Application for InCity Farms with the added language "submitted 24 in 2015". Motion passed unanimously. 25 26 B. Medina Golf and Country Club — General Plan PUD, CUP Amendment and 27 Site Plan Review (8:16 p.m.) 28 Sparks stated that this discussion is continued from the last Council meeting as the 29 Council desired additional details regarding the proposed building materials. He stated 30 that the applicant provided the requested information and brought a material sample with 31 them tonight. He stated that if the Council is in agreement with the request an ordinance 32 and resolutions have been prepared for approval, noting that alternate language has 33 also been drafted if the proposed materials are not desired by the Council. 34 35 Erin McManus, Superintendent at the Medina Golf and Country Club, stated that they 36 have prepared pictures following the last meeting to address the concerns of the 37 Council. He provided renderings of the building along with the line of sight distances to 38 neighboring developments. He advised that additional trees had been planted 39 previously to provide screening in anticipation of the future development of the 40 neighboring property. He advised that additional trees would be planted near the 41 proposed maintenance facility. He provided photographs of the sight lines from 42 neighboring developments. He noted that there is a gap in screening near the 43 Dominium property and they are working with them to more appropriately screen that 44 area with a berm and trees planted atop the berm. He also included photographs of 45 buildings with the same proposed materials used at other similar facilities. He noted that 46 the proposed material would be relatively maintenance free and the color palette can 47 blend more appropriately with the surroundings. 48 49 Mitchell questioned the coloring of the materials proposed. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 May 19, 2015 1 McManus stated that the darker color would be used for the bottom section, 2 approximately 48 inches, while the lighter color would be used for the top portion of the 3 building, with a dark colored roof as well. 4 5 Mitchell questioned if the intention of the remodeling of the existing building would be to 6 match the newer material. 7 8 McManus confirmed that the intent would be to improve that existing facility to match the 9 aesthetic and pitch of the other roofs. 10 11 Mitchell stated that perhaps some architectural features could be added to break up the 12 roof area. 13 14 McManus confirmed that some of those aspects could be added in to add interest and 15 break up the solid roof. He stated that the intent with the proposed material would be to 16 fit with the character of the campus rather than a concrete block building that would 17 stand out. 18 19 Cousineau questioned if there was a reason multiple materials were not proposed. 20 21 McManus stated that the intent is to blend the facility with the existing facility without 22 adding too many materials. 23 24 Mitchell questioned the impact approval would have on the ordinance. 25 26 Sparks stated that this is part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and therefore there 27 is flexibility from the strict regulations of the ordinance. 28 29 Martin stated that she is struggling with the fact that this would not comply with the code. 30 She stated that she does appreciate the presentation but was not aware that any metal 31 buildings have been allowed in the City. 32 33 McManus stated that is where the PUD element comes into play as this is a unique 34 campus. He stated that the proposed material is high in quality, noting that some people 35 are building homes out of the material. 36 37 Cousineau stated that the code does not allow more than 20 percent of this building 38 material while the applicant is requesting 100 percent. She stated that perhaps a 39 compromise could be made. 40 41 Martin stated that she is unsure that a compromise could be made as this would not 42 comply with the code. 43 44 Mitchell stated that he would prefer this material compared to the concrete allowed and 45 used by the adjacent City building. He also noted that the building fagade would be 46 softened with additional architectural elements. He stated that today's metal building 47 materials are not the same materials that were undesirable in the past. 48 49 Martin questioned if there are other metal structures within the City. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 May 19, 2015 1 Finke confirmed that there are some metal buildings that were allowed prior to the 2 revised ordinances in the 1980's. 3 4 Todd Hyde, Board member of the Medina Golf and Country Club, stated that McManus 5 does have a hard and fast budget as approved by the Board. He explained that budget 6 was used to propose a building that is nice looking and will allow additional funds for 7 landscaping and buffering. He stated that if another more expensive material is used, 8 the landscaping elements will not be to this level. 9 10 Martin stated that as this is a PUD the Council would have the flexibility to provide for 11 something other than what would normally be required. She stated that the PUD 12 language states that the flexibility raises the bar rather than coming up with something 13 less. She stated that the PUD intent provides for something better and questioned if the 14 building as proposed with these materials is something that creates a higher standard. 15 She stated that she cannot visualize that. 16 17 Cousineau stated that she is also struggling with that element. 18 19 Hyde stated that they believe that this material would provide that enhancement over the 20 concrete, which would be allowed. 21 22 Martin questioned if the applicant has researched other materials that have the 23 appearance of residential wood siding. 24 25 McManus stated that hardie siding would be an option but stated that his home is 26 composed of that material and is failing after eight or nine years. He stated that the 27 proposed materials would be a lot less maintenance and would be reliable. He believed 28 that a concrete building, similar to the City building, would not be as aesthetically 29 pleasing and would not fit with the harmony of the campus. 30 31 Martin stated that the regular code not only applies but there are other levels of code, 32 which also apply including PUD and an element regarding accessory buildings. She 33 stated that the City building is not within a PUD and therefore would not have that 34 additional layer of requirements. She stated that the City has been cooperative with the 35 Golf Course in the development of The Villas but has concern that this would be in 36 violation of the ordinance. 37 38 Hyde commented that he believed that this proposed structure would meet the 39 stipulations of the PUD ordinance. 40 41 Martin questioned why the maintenance facility is not composed of the same material 42 proposed for the restrooms. 43 44 McManus explained that those are member buildings and therefore match the Country 45 Club building while the maintenance facilities would be more aesthetically matching as 46 they would not be for members. 47 48 Mitchell stated that he is not persuaded that the Council could not approve this request 49 as the materials would be an improvement from concrete. He stated that there are 50 architectural elements that could be added to provide more style. He stated that he 51 does not oppose the materials or colors but would suggest some architectural elements Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8 May 19, 2015 1 to soften the aesthetic. He stated that he would like to find a way to approve the 2 request. 3 4 Pederson agreed that the suggested architectural elements would soften the fa9ade. He 5 stated that the City decided to use cheaper materials for the salt storage shed for the 6 same reasoning. 7 8 Cousineau stated that the architectural elements would soften the fa9ade and would like 9 to find a way to compromise. She stated that personally she would like to stick to the 20 10 percent metal limitation but was unsure that would be in the applicant's design plans. 11 She stated that perhaps artificial stone or blocks could be placed at the bottom of the 12 building. 13 14 Mitchell stated that would reduce the amount of metal but the metal would still exceed 15 the 20 percent limit. 16 17 Hyde stated that they could agree with that type of compromise and could use a different 18 material rather than the dark colored metal. He explained that they do not want to 19 exactly mimic the clubhouse as the clubhouse is 16 years old and therefore the buildings 20 will never match. He stated that they would attempt to match the maintenance facilities 21 to each other. 22 23 McManus stated that they will attempt to reuse architectural elements from the barn and 24 if those cannot be reused they will purchase new ones. 25 26 Mitchell stated that this could move forward under a PUD but stated that perhaps the 27 ordinance should be reconsidered as well. 28 29 Finke stated that those enhancements are built into the PUD ordinance. 30 31 Hyde stated that no one will be closer to the buildings than the members of the facility 32 and advised that not one person was opposed to the material. 33 34 Mitchell referenced other cities and areas, noting that you can never exactly match an 35 existing building. 36 37 McManus explained that this redesign will be more efficient than moving between the 38 existing facility and the barn and advised that the equipment will be stored within the 39 building rather than outdoors. He confirmed that all the equipment will be stored indoors 40 once the new facility is constructed. 41 42 Martin questioned if the storm water elements have been resolved. 43 44 Kellogg stated that he was unaware of any resolution. 45 46 Finke stated that the applicant would have to meet the storm water management 47 ordinance. 48 49 Martin stated that if the applicant is willing to add the architectural elements suggested 50 by Mitchell, perhaps the Council should see that noting that there is additional time left in 51 the review period. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 9 May 19, 2015 1 2 Mitchell agreed that he would like to see those elements added. 3 4 Johnson confirmed that the Council would like to see added block at the bottom of the 5 facility, dormers, cupolas, and window treatments. 6 7 Martin stated that she would also like to see a more close-up view of the renderings 8 showing the proposed building on the site. She stated that perhaps not all of the 9 elements would be needed. 10 11 Mitchell questioned if the Council would like to direct staff to prepare a resolution of 12 approval, which would allow the applicant additional time to provide that information. 13 14 Martin stated that it would also be helpful for the applicant to review the PUD and 15 accessory building ordinances to better meld to those criteria. 16 17 Mitchell stated that the applicant should better define the style of the new maintenance 18 buildings to explain why they would complement and not compete with the existing 19 clubhouse. He noted that the green space and landscaping would also support the 20 PUD. 21 22 Hyde questioned if the consensus of the Council would then be to allow the metal 23 building. He stated that he does not want to direct the architects to go further down the 24 design path to add the architectural elements and then go back to the discussion of 25 whether metal would be allowed. 26 27 Martin provided further clarity to the PUD ordinance and stated that perhaps adding the 28 rock to the bottom of the maintenance building and adding architectural elements would 29 accomplish the elements of the PUD. 30 31 Cousineau stated that perhaps the building could better match the existing facility. 32 33 Hyde stated that the existing building is concrete block and would be made to better 34 match the new facility. 35 36 Mitchell stated that perhaps the stone would make the building jump out more. He 37 stated that the Council believes that the applicant and their architect can do a better job 38 on the design. 39 40 Cousineau questioned if the Council was in agreement with the 100 percent metal if the 41 architectural elements would be added. 42 43 Mitchell and Pederson stated that they would be in agreement with the 100 percent 44 metal. 45 46 Martin noted that the additional trees would help support that request as well. 47 48 Johnson confirmed that three out of the four Councilmembers would be in agreement 49 with the 100 percent metal building with the additional architectural elements. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 10 May 19, 2015 1 Martin stated that she does appreciate the effort of the applicant but noted that she is 2 struggling with the language of the ordinance. 3 4 Mitchell suggested that the applicant meet with staff to get further clarity on the 5 ordinance language in an attempt to move forward. 6 7 Moved by Cousineau, seconded by Martin, to table the General Plan PUD, CUP 8 Amendment and Site Plan Review for the Medina Golf and Country Club. Motion 9 passed unanimously. 10 11 IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (9:26 p.m.) 12 Johnson reported that Mayor Mitchell, Council Member Pederson, Belland, and him, met 13 with Ray McCoy who has stated that the two Fire Departments are willing to discuss 14 consolidation and will attempt to bring an update back to the Council by June 16th 15 16 X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (9:28 p.m.) 17 Pederson stated that he attended a Mayor's meeting the previous week and found it to 18 be one of the best meetings he has ever attended. He reported that he also attended 19 the Uptown Hamel meeting as well as a relief meeting for the Hamel Fire Department. 20 21 Mitchell reported that there was a luncheon the previous week to honor law 22 enforcement. 23 24 Belland stated that two Officers, Sgt. Nelson and Officer Converse, were recognized for 25 their efforts during critical incidents at the luncheon referenced by Mitchell. 26 27 Martin stated that she attended the Lake Independence Citizens Association meeting 28 and found it to be informative. 29 30 Cousineau stated that she would be attending an upcoming watershed meeting as well 31 as the park tour. 32 33 Xl. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (9:31 p.m.) 34 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the bills, EFT 003132E- 35 003161E for $51,888.35, order check numbers 42810-42870 for $165,269.01, and 36 payroll EFT 506381-506412 for $46,636.05. Motion passed unanimously. 37 38 XII. ADJOURN 39 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Cousineau, to adjourn the meeting at 9:32 p.m. 40 Motion passed unanimously. 41 42 43 44 Bob Mitchell, Mayor 45 Attest: 46 47 48 Scott Johnson, City Administrator Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 11 May 19, 2015 Agenda Item # 5A MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant to City Administrator DATE: May 28, 2015 RE: July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016 Liquor Licenses Council Action Requested: Approval of the Liquor License Renewals Listed Below. LIST OF LIQUOR LICENSES Establishment Classification License Type Fee 1. Medina Recreations: Restaurant On Sale - Class A $ 7,500 Off Sale $ 150 Sunday $ 200 Dance $ 100 2. Medina Golf & Country Club: Restaurant On Sale - Class A $ 7,500 Sunday $ 200 3. Inn Kahoots: Restaurant On Sale - Class D $ 4,500 Off Sale $ 150 Sunday $ 200 4. Baker National Golf Course: 3.2 Malt Beverage & Beer On Sale 3.2 $ 100 Off Sale 3.2 $ 50 5. American Legion #394: 3.2 Malt Beverage & Beer On Sale 3.2 $ 100 6. North American Liquors Liquor Store Off Sale $ 150 (Medina Liquors): 7. Liquor Depot: Liquor Store Off Sale 8. Jensen & Sons, Inc. Liquor Store Off Sale $ 150 $ 150 Agenda Item # 5B CURB AND CONCRETE INSTALLATION SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this 2nd day of June 2015, by and between Schmidt Curb Co. Inc., 13195 95d' Street NE, Elk River, MN 55330, a Minnesota corporation (the "Contractor") and the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"). Recitals 1. The City has been authorized to enter into a contract for curb and concrete installation services; and 2. The City has approved the contract for curb and concrete installation services with the Contractor; and 3. The parties wish to define the scope of services and terms of their agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Contractor agree as follows: Terms 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. The Contractor will perform curb installation services for the City. "Curb and Concrete Installation Services" will consist of installing curb and concrete using MN- D.O.T. D424 and/or MN-D.O.T. B618, as per the 2015 Road Material Bids. Any curb work performed will be at the discretion of the Public Works Director, according to the compensation schedule below. 2.0. TERM. The term and prices of this contract shall remain in effect from June 2015 until November 2015, or until such later date as may be mutually agreed upon. 3.0 COMPENSATION. The City shall compensate the Contractor as follows: Curb Installation — MN-D.O.T. D424: • $26.00 per lineal foot - New Installation Curb Installation — MN-D.O.T. B618: • $25.00 per lineal foot - New Installation 3.01 The Contractor shall pay for all licenses and permits. These costs shall be included in the bid cost. The City is exempt from sales tax. 4.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 4.01 Both the Contractor and the City acknowledge and agree that the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Any employee or subcontractor who may perform services for the Contractor in connection with this Agreement is also not an employee of the City. The Contractor understands that the City will not provide any benefits of any type in connection with this Agreement, including but not limited to health or medical insurance, worker's compensation insurance and 1 unemployment insurance, nor will the City withhold any state or federal taxes, including income or payroll taxes, which may be payable by the Contractor. 4.02 The Contractor will supply and use its own equipment and tools to complete the services under this Agreement. 4.03 The Contractor acknowledges that any general instruction it receives from the City has no effect on its status as an independent contractor. 5.0 INSURANCE. The Contractor will maintain adequate insurance to protect itself and the City from claims and liability for injury or damage to persons or property for all work performed by the Contractor and its respective employees or agents under this Agreement. The Contractor shall name the City as an additional insured under its commercial general liability policy in limits acceptable to the City. Prior to performing any services under this Agreement, the Contractor shall provide evidence to the City that acceptable insurance coverage is effective. 6.0 WORKER'S COMPENSATION. 6.01 The Contractor will comply with the provisions of the Minnesota worker's compensation statute as an independent contractor before commencing work under this Agreement. 6.02 The Contractor will provide its own worker's compensation insurance and will provide evidence to the City of such coverage before commencing work under this Agreement. 7.0 INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor will hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including defense, settlement, and reasonable attorney's fees) for claims as a result of bodily injury, loss of life, property damages and any other damages arising out of the Contractor's performance under this Agreement. 8.0 PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BOND. The Contractor may be required to provide a Payment and Performance Bond to the City at no additional cost to the City. 9.0 PRIVATIZATION CLAUSE. Contractor agrees to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the "Act") and all other applicable state and federal laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. All data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained or disseminated by the Contractor in performing its obligations is subject to the requirements of the Act, and the Contractor must comply with the requirements of the Act as if the Contractor was a government entity. 10.0 APPLICABLE LAW. The execution, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement will, in all respects, be controlled and governed by the laws of Minnesota. 2 11.0 ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor may not assign this Agreement or procure the services of another individual or company to provide services under this Agreement without first obtaining the express written consent of the City. 12.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties, and no other agreement prior to or contemporaneous with this Agreement shall be effective, except as expressly set forth or incorporated herein. Any purported amendment to this Agreement is not effective unless it is in writing and executed by both parties. 13.0 NO WAIVER BY CITY. By entering into this Agreement, the City does not waive its entitlement to any immunity under statute or common law. 14.0 TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time, for any reason. If the contract is terminated early, the City will pay a prorated fee for the services performed to date in that calendar year. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. CITY OF MEDINA By Bob Mitchell, Mayor By Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk SCHMIDT CURB COMPANY, INC. (CONTRACTOR) By Tom Schmidt 3 Agenda Item # 5C Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2015-XX RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY CLEAN WATER PARTNERSHIP GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE ARDMORE AVENUE STORMWATER RETROFIT WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the City of Medina propose to construct a water quality pond for the removal of sediment and nutrients for the Ardmore Avenue Stormwater Retrofit Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, the intention of the project is to provide a calculable reduction in phosphorous loads on both Lake Independence and Lake Ardmore, and WHEREAS, to construct this project the City has been approved to receive grant funds from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Clean Water Fund in the amount of $66,326; and WHEREAS, the partners will need to provide a 50% grant match of $33,163, which can be in the form of cash and cash value for in -kind services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Medina approves the grant application from the MPCA Clean Water Fund for the Ardmore Avenue Stormwater Retrofit Water Quality Improvement Project. Dated: June 2, 2015. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2015- June 2, 2015 Agenda Item # SD Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2015- RESOLUTION APPROVING MASTER SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT FOR MINNESOTA COURT DATA SERVICES WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City of Medina, on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney and the Medina Police Department, desires to enter into a Master Subscriber Agreement for Minnesota Court Data Services for Governmental Agencies with the State of Minnesota, Office of State Court Administration, to obtain access to Court Records and Documents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Master Subscriber Agreement for Minnesota Court Data Services for Governmental Agencies between the State of Minnesota, Office of State Court Administration, and the City of Medina is hereby approved. 2. Scott T. Johnson, the City Administrator, is designated the Authorized Representative and is authorized to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City of Medina. Dated: June 2, 2015. Attest: By: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2015- June 2, 2015 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Medina, MN's $1.8M GO Improvement Bonds, Ser.2015A Global Credit Research - 29 May 2015 Maintains Aa2 on $14.9M of GO debt MEDINA (CITY OF) MN Cities (including Towns, Villages and Townships) MN Moody's Rating ISSUE RATING General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A Aa2 Sale Amount $1, 765, 000 Expected Sale Date 06/04/15 Rating Description General Obligation Moody's Outlook NOO NEW YORK, May 29, 2015 --Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa2 rating to the City of Medina's (MN) $1.8 million General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A. Concurrently, Moody's also maintains the Aa2 rating on the city's outstanding general obligation debt. Post -sale, the city will have $15.1 million in outstanding general obligation debt, of which $14.9 million is rated by Moody's. SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE The Aa2 rating reflects the city's moderately sized affluent tax base west of the Twin Cities; strong financial operations supported by healthy reserves; average debt burden with no future borrowing plans; and moderate exposure to unfunded pension liabilities. OUTLOOK Outlooks are usually not assigned to local government credits with this amount of debt outstanding. WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO UP - Substantial tax base growth - Maintenance of healthy reserve levels WHAT COULD MAKE THE RATING GO DOWN - Material declines in liquidity and General Fund reserves - Declines in tax base valuation below similarly rated entities STRENGTHS - Affluent city west of Twin Cities with strong resident demographics - Strong financial operations, with steady revenue streams CHALLENGES - Smaller tax base relative to similarly rated entities RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Recent developments are incorporated in the Detailed Rating Rationale. DETAILED RATING RATIONALE ECONOMY AND TAX BASE: MODERATELY SIZED, AFFLUENT TAX BASE WEST OF TWIN CITIES; RECENT IMPROVEMENT IN VALUATIONS We expect the city's tax base will continue to grow due to its favorable location in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and strong demographic profile. The city's moderately sized $1.4 billion tax base (economic market value), experienced several years of declines during the recession due to residential housing depreciation. Favorably, the city's valuations have demonstrated a strong resurgence, with the assessor's estimated market value increasing by 3% in 2013 and 9% in 2014. Management reports that preliminary figures for 2015 show an 8% increase in the assessor's estimated market value. The increases are attributable to both appreciation in residential housing as well as new development. The city is mostly residential at 78% of net tax capacity. City officials report that several residential housing projects are currently underway, most with over 100 single family homes planned. In 2013 and 2014 the city issued 144 and 82 new single family home permits, respectively, compared to only 15 in 2011. The city expects growth to continue at a similar pace going forward. The ten largest taxpayers comprised 7% of net tax capacity, which include a few individual residential properties, and are reportedly stable. The majority of residents commute to various employment centers within the Twin Cities metro area, in addition to some local employers. Unemployment for Hennepin County (Aaa stable) remains low at 3.7% for March 2015 compared to 4.5% in the state and 5.6% in the nation for the same time period. City's wealth indices far exceed the nation with median family income at 242% of the nation according to the 2008-2012 American Community Survey estimates. FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND RESERVES: STRONG FINANCIAL OPERATIONS SUPPORTED BY HEALTHY GENERAL FUND RESERVES The city's financial operations are expected to remain strong due to prudent financial management and healthy General Fund reserve levels. The city has a history of posting annual operating surpluses, with regular transfers of excess funds to various capital funds. The city has a formal fund balance policy to maintain a minimum unassigned General Fund balance between 35% and 50% of General Fund revenues. The city's available General Fund reserves have grown from $1.6 million (42.3% of revenues) in fiscal 2009 to $2.1 million, or a stronger 48.3% of revenues, in fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2014, the city reported a $108,000 General Fund surplus prior to transfers. The city transferred out $857,000 to various capital projects funds in order to maintain reserves in line with its policy. For fiscal 2015, the city passed a balanced budget and officials report positive financial operations with greater than budgeted building permit revenues. Management expects that General Fund reserves will remain flat or there will be a modest increase, as the city will continue to transfer any surplus to its capital projects funds. The city's operations are supported by steady revenue streams. Property taxes are the city's largest source of revenue, which comprised 65% of General Fund revenues in fiscal 2014. Licenses and permits are the next largest revenue stream at 11 % of revenues as the city continues to receive strong building permit revenue. The city does not receive any state local government aid (LGA), insulating the city from state budgetary pressures. Liquidity Similar to the city's available General Fund balance, the city maintains strong General Fund cash balances. The city closed 2014 with a General Fund cash position of $2.7 million, or 62.4% of revenue. DEBT AND PENSIONS: MANAGEABLE DEBT BURDEN WITH MINIMAL FUTURE BORROWING PLANS Post -sale, the city's net direct debt burden will be a moderate 1.1 % of full value, and its overall debt burden will be 3.3% of full value. We expect the city's debt burden to remain manageable given minimal future borrowing needs. Management reports that the city may issue some equipment certificates in 2017, but has no other borrowing plans. The transfer of General Fund surplus revenues into its capital projects funds has allowed the city to cash finance many of its capital projects. Debt Structure Post -sale the city will have $15.1 million of GO debt outstanding, of which $14.9 million is rated by Moody's. Amortization of the city's GO debt is average, with 67% of principal retired within ten years. All of the city's outstanding debt is long-term and fixed rate. Debt -Related Derivatives The city is not party to any interest rate swap agreements. Pensions and OPEB Moody's three year average adjusted net pension liability (ANPL), net of self-supporting enterprise contributions, through fiscal 2013 is $6.8 million, equivalent to 0.5% of full valuation and 1.4 times operating revenue. The ANPL is based upon our allocation of the reported unfunded liabilities of two multi -employer cost -sharing pension plans, the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF). Moody's ANPL reflects certain adjustments we make to improve comparability of reported pension liabilities. The adjustments are not intended to replace the city's reported liability information, but to improve comparability with other rated entities. The actuarial valuation dates for the cost sharing plans are June 30, 2013. The city's total fiscal 2014 contribution to the plans, net of self-supporting enterprises, was $184,000, or 4% of operating revenues. MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE: STRONG INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; HEALTHY OPERATING HISTORY Minnesota cities have an institutional framework score of "Aa" or strong. Cities rely on property taxes to fund the majority of operations followed by state aid. State Local Government Aid (LGA) typically comprise the second largest source and ranges approximately from 0% to 80%, or on average 25% of GF revenues. The State increased aid for next biennium, after years of state aid cuts and stagnant aid. Cities typically have above average debt related expenditures. Notably, overall expenditures are predictable and cities have the ability to reduce expenditures if necessary, and benefit from unlimited operating levy authority. Medina benefits from a strong management team as well as robust financial policies. The city has historically posted annual operating surpluses and transferred any excess reserves to its capital projects funds, which has also minimized the cities borrowing needs. KEY STATISTICS - Full valuation (economic market value): $1.4 billion - Estimated full value per capita: $286,700 - 2008-2012 Median Family Income as a % of the US: 242% - 2013 Operating Fund Balance as a % of Revenues: 42.4% - Five -Year Dollar Change in Fund Balance as % of Revenues: 10.5% - 2013 Cash Balance as a % of Revenues: 54.8% - Five -Year Dollar Change in Cash Balance as % of Revenues: 17.8% - Institutional Framework: Aa - Operating History (Five -Year Average of Operating Revenues/Operating Expenditures): 1.07x - Net Direct Debt/Full Value: 1.1% - Net Direct Debt/Operating Revenues: 3.1x - Three -Year Average of Moody's ANPUFull Value: 0.5% - Three -Year Average of Moody's ANPUOperating Revenues: 1.4x OBLIGOR PROFILE The City of Medina is located approximately 20 miles west of Minneapolis and covers an area of approximately 27 square miles. The city had 4,892 residents as of the 2010 census. LEGAL SECURITY All of the city's GO bonds are secured by the city's full faith and credit, general obligation pledge, which benefits from a dedicated property tax levy that is unlimited by rate or amount. USE OF PROCEEDS Proceeds of the bonds will be used to finance road reconstruction and water and sewer improvements associated with the 2015 Tower Drive and Hamel Road Improvement Projects. PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY The principal methodology used in this rating was US Local Government General Obligation Debt published in January 2014. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Analysts Cora Bruemmer Lead Analyst Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Genevieve Nolan Additional Contact Public Finance Group Moody's Investors Service Contacts Journalists: (212) 553-0376 Research Clients: (212) 553-1653 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 USA MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE © 2015 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ("MIS") ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT -LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT -LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL -BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third -party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody's Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly -owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761 G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761 G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for "retail clients" to make any investment decision based on MOODY'S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. For Japan only: MOODY'S Japan K.K. ("MJKK") is a wholly -owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MOODY'S Group Japan G.K., which is wholly -owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly -owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF Japan K.K. ("MSFJ") is a wholly -owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in said City on Tuesday, June 2, 2015, commencing at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: * * * The Mayor announced that the next order of business was consideration of the proposals which had been received for the purchase of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A, to be issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,765,000. The City Administrator -Clerk presented a tabulation of the proposals that had been received in the manner specified in the Terms of Proposal for the Bonds. The proposals were as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached. After due consideration of the proposals, Member then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 RESOLUTION NO.2015-xx A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2015A, IN THE ORIGINAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $1,765,000; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Sale of Bonds. 1.01 Authority. It is hereby determined that: (a) Certain assessable public improvements, including street and utility reconstruction of and mill and overlay projects for Tower Drive, Hamel Road, and Kilkenny Lane in the City (collectively, the "Improvements"), have been made, duly ordered or contracts let for the construction thereof pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475, as amended (collectively, the "Act"). (b) It is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the affairs of the City to issue its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A (the "Bonds"), in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,765,000, to provide financing for the Improvements. (c) The City is authorized by Section 475.60, subdivision 2(9) of the Act to negotiate the sale of the Bonds, it being determined that the City has retained an independent financial advisor in connection with such sale. The actions of the City staff and the City's municipal advisor in negotiating the sale of the Bonds are ratified and confirmed in all aspects. 1.02. Award to the Purchaser and Interest Rates. The proposal of (the "Purchaser") to purchase the Bonds of the City is hereby found and determined to be a reasonable offer and is hereby accepted, the proposal being to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ (par amount of $1,765,000, [plus original issue premium of $ ,] [less original issue discount of $ ,] less underwriter's discount of $ ), plus accrued interest to date of delivery, if any, for Bonds bearing interest as follows: Year of Interest Year of Interest Maturity Rate Maturity Rate 2017 % 2025 2018 2026 2019 2027 2020 2028 2021 2029 2022 2030 2023 2031 2024 True interest cost: 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 2 1.03. Purchase Contract. The sum of $ , being the amount proposed by the Purchaser in excess of $1,743,820, shall be credited to the Debt Service Fund hereinafter created or deposited in the Construction Fund hereinafter created, as determined by the City's Finance Director in consultation with the City's municipal advisor. The Finance Director is directed to retain the good faith check of the Purchaser, pending completion of the sale of the Bonds, and to return the good faith checks of the unsuccessful proposers. The Mayor and City Administrator -Clerk are directed to execute a contract with the Purchaser on behalf of the City. 1.04. Terms and Principal Amounts of the Bonds. The City will forthwith issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to the Act in the total principal amount of $1,765,000, originally dated June 24, 2015, in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, numbered No. R-1, upward, bearing interest as above set forth, and maturing serially on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: Year of Maturity 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Amount Year of Maturity 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Amount 1.05. Optional Redemption. The City may elect on February 1, 2024, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2025. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC (as defined in Section 7 hereof) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. [1.06. Mandatory Redemption; Term Bonds. To be completed if Term Bonds are requested by the Purchaser.] Section 2. Registration and Payment. 2.01. Registered Form. The Bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment date, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2016, to the registered owners of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not that day is a business day. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 3 2.03. Registration. The City will appoint a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (the "Registrar"). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar provides for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of a Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. When Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When a Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the Bond until the Registrar is satisfied that the endorsement on the Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (0 Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name a Bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether the Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes and payments so made to registered owner or upon the owner's order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. The Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of Bonds, sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. If a Bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar will deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the City and the Registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar will be cancelled by the Registrar and evidence of such cancellation must be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 4 already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Redemption. In the event any of the Bonds are called for redemption, notice thereof identifying the Bonds to be redeemed will be given by the Registrar by mailing a copy of the redemption notice by first class mail (postage prepaid) to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the Registrar and by publishing the notice if required by law. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to any registered owner, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of Bonds. Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the place of payment at that time. 2.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City appoints Bond Trust Services Corporation, Roseville, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Administrator -Clerk are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar upon 30 days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar must deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the Finance Director must transmit to the Registrar monies sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds will be prepared under the direction of the City Administrator -Clerk and executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator -Clerk, provided that those signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of a Bond, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, a Bond will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a Bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Administrator -Clerk will deliver the same to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.06. Temporary Bonds. The City may elect to deliver in lieu of printed definitive Bonds one or more typewritten temporary Bonds in substantially the form set forth in EXHIBIT B such changes as may be necessary to reflect more than one maturity in a single temporary bond. Upon the execution and delivery of definitive Bonds the temporary Bonds will be exchanged therefor and cancelled. Section 3. Form of Bond. 3.01. Execution of the Bonds. The Bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the form as attached hereto as EXHIBIT B. 3.02. Approving Legal Opinion. The City Administrator -Clerk is directed to obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, which is to be complete except as to dating thereof and to cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each Bond. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 5 Section 4. Payment; Security; Pledges and Covenants. 4.01. Debt Service Fund. The Bonds are payable from the General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A Debt Service Fund (the "Debt Service Fund") hereby created, and the proceeds of general taxes hereinafter levied (the "Taxes") and special assessments levied or to be levied (the "Assessments") for the Improvements described herein are hereby pledged to the Debt Service Fund. There is appropriated to the Debt Service Fund (i) capitalized interest financed from Bond proceeds, if any; and (ii) amounts over the minimum purchase price of the Bonds paid by the Purchaser, to the extent designated for deposit in the Debt Service Fund in accordance with Section 1.03 hereof. 4.02. Construction Fund. The proceeds of the Bonds, less the appropriations made in Section 4.01 hereof, together with any other funds appropriated for the Improvements and Assessments and Taxes collected during the construction of the Improvements, will be deposited in a separate construction fund (the "Construction Fund") to be used solely to defray expenses of the Improvements and the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the Improvements. Any balance remaining in the Construction Fund after completion of the Improvements may be used to pay the cost in whole or in part of any other improvement instituted under the Act under the direction of the City Council. When the Improvements are completed and the cost thereof paid, the Construction Fund is to be closed and subsequent collections of Assessments and Taxes for the Improvements are to be deposited in the Debt Service Fund. 4.03. City Covenants. It is hereby determined that the Improvements will directly and indirectly benefit abutting property, and the City hereby covenants with the holders from time to time of the Bonds as follows: (a) The City has caused or will cause the Assessments for the Improvements to be promptly levied so that the first installment will be collectible not later than 2016 and will take all steps necessary to assure prompt collection, and the levy of the Assessments is hereby authorized. The City Council will cause to be taken with due diligence all further actions that are required for the construction of each Improvement financed wholly or partly from the proceeds of the Bonds, and will take all further actions necessary for the final and valid levy of the Assessments and the appropriation of any other funds needed to pay the Bonds and interest thereon when due. (b) In the event of any current or anticipated deficiency in Assessments and Taxes, the City Council will levy additional ad valorem taxes in the amount of the current or anticipated deficiency. (c) The City will keep complete and accurate books and records showing receipts and disbursements in connection with the Improvements, Assessments and Taxes levied therefor and other funds appropriated for their payment, collections thereof and disbursements therefrom, monies on hand and, the balance of unpaid Assessments. (d) The City will cause its books and records to be audited at least annually and will furnish copies of such audit reports to any interested person upon request. (e) At least twenty percent (20%) of the cost of the assessable Improvements described herein will be specially assessed against benefited properties. 4.04. Pledge of Tax Levy. For the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the Bonds, there is levied a direct annual irrepealable ad valorem tax upon all of the taxable property in the City, which will be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general taxes of the City. The Taxes will be credited to the Debt Service Fund above provided and will be in the years and amounts as attached hereto as EXHIBIT C. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 6 4.05. General Obligation Pledge. If a payment of principal of or interest on the Bonds becomes due when there is not sufficient money in the Debt Service Fund to pay the same, the Finance Director is directed to pay such principal or interest from the general fund of the City, and the general fund will be reimbursed for those advances out of the proceeds of Assessments and Taxes when collected. 4.06. Certification to Taxpayer Services Division Manager as to Debt Service Fund Amount. It is hereby determined that the estimated collections of Assessments and the foregoing Taxes will produce at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds. The tax levy herein provided is irrepealable until all of the Bonds are paid, provided that at the time the City makes its annual tax levies the Finance Director may certify to the Taxpayer Services Division Manager of Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Taxpayer Services Division Manager") the amount available in the Debt Service Fund to pay principal and interest due during the ensuing year, and the Taxpayer Services Division Manager will thereupon reduce the levy collectible during such year by the amount so certified. 4.07. Certificate of Taxpayer Services Division Manager as to Registration. The City Administrator -Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Taxpayer Services Division Manager and to obtain the certificate required by Section 475.63 of the Act. Section 5. Authentication of Transcript. 5.01. City Proceedings and Records. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the Bonds, and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, may be deemed representations of the City as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. Certification as to Official Statement. The Mayor, City Administrator -Clerk, and Finance Director are authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the Official Statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Official Statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the Official Statement. 5.03. Other Certificates. The Mayor, City Administrator -Clerk, and Finance Director are hereby authorized and directed to furnish to the Purchaser at the closing such certificates as are required as a condition of sale. Unless litigation shall have been commenced and be pending questioning the Bonds or the organization of the City or incumbency of its officers, at the closing the Mayor, the City Administrator -Clerk, and the Finance Director shall also execute and deliver to the Purchaser a suitable certificate as to absence of material litigation, and the Finance Director shall also execute and deliver a certificate as to payment for and delivery of the Bonds. 5.04. Payment of Costs of Issuance. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to K1einBank, Chaska, Minnesota, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's municipal advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 7 Section 6. Tax Covenant. 6.01. Tax -Exempt Bonds. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 6.02. No Rebate Required. (a) The City will comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Bonds under Section 103 of the Code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States, if the Bonds (together with other obligations reasonably expected to be issued in calendar year 2015) exceed the small -issuer exception amount of $5,000,000. (b) For purposes of qualifying for the small issuer exception to the federal arbitrage rebate requirements, the City finds, determines and declares that the aggregate face amount of all tax-exempt bonds (other than private activity bonds) issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued and outstanding at one time is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000, all within the meaning of Section 148(f)(4)(D) of the Code. 6.03. Not Private Activity Bonds. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 6.04. Qualified Tax -Exempt Obligations. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code; (b) the City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than any private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2015 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2015 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 6.05. Procedural Requirements. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 8 Section 7. Book -Entry System; Limited Obligation of City. 7.01. DTC. The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered Bond for each of the maturities of the Bonds as described in Section 1.04 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each Bond will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns ("DTC"). Except as provided in this section, all of the outstanding Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 7.02. Participants. With respect to Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository (the "Participants") or to any other person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the Registrar) of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of Bonds, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal, premium and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all other purposes. The Paying Agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, will receive a certificated Bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the City Administrator -Clerk of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words "Cede & Co." will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice, the City Administrator -Clerk will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Registrar and Paying Agent. 7.03. Representation Letter. The City has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (the "Representation Letter") which shall govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds. Any Paying Agent or Registrar subsequently appointed by the City with respect to the Bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the Representation Letter with respect to the Registrar and Paying Agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers Outside Book -Entry System. In the event the City, by resolution of the City Council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the Bonds that they be able to obtain Bond certificates, the City will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates. In such event the City will issue, transfer and exchange Bond certificates as requested by DTC and any other registered owners in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities depository is appointed, the City will issue and the Registrar will authenticate Bond certificates in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 9 7.05. Payments to Cede & Co. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution to the contrary, so long as a Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and notices with respect to the Bond will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC's Operational Arrangements, as set forth in the Representation Letter. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. 8.01. Execution of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. "Continuing Disclosure Certificate" means that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed by the Mayor and City Administrator -Clerk and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. 8.02. City Compliance with Provisions of Continuing Disclosure Certificate. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, failure of the City to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the Bonds; however, any Bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this section. Section 9. Defeasance. When all Bonds and all interest thereon have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds will cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the City for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will remain in full force and effect. The City may discharge all Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full. If any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 10 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 11 EXHIBIT A PROPOSALS 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 A-1 EXHIBIT B FORM OF BOND No. R- $ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF MEDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BOND SERIES 2015A Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue February 1, 20_ June 24, 2015 Registered Owner: Cede & Co. CUSIP The City of Medina, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City"), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $ on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2016, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by Bond Trust Services Corporation, Roseville, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Paying Agent, Transfer Agent and Authenticating Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The City may elect on February 1, 2024, and on any day thereafter to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2025. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $1,765,000 all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, redemption privilege, and interest rate, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on June 2, 2015 (the "Resolution"), for the purpose of providing money to defray the expenses incurred and to be incurred in making local improvements, pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475, as amended, and the principal hereof and interest hereon are payable in part from special assessments against property specially benefited by local improvements and in part from ad valorem taxes for the City's share of the cost of the improvements, as set forth in the 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 B-1 Resolution to which reference is made for a full statement of rights and powers thereby conferred. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy additional ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in special assessments and taxes pledged, which additional taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. The City Council has designated the issue of Bonds of which this Bond forms a part as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required, and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or manual signatures of the Mayor and City Administrator -Clerk and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: June 24, 2015 CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA (Facsimile) (Facsimile) Mayor City Administrator -Clerk 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 B-2 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION By Authorized Representative ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, will be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants in common TEN ENT -- as tenants by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act, State of Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: Signature Guaranteed: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 B-3 NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program ("STAMP"), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program ("SEMP"), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program ("MSP") or other such "signature guarantee program" as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, SEMP or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Bond Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this Bond is held by joint account.) Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within Bond has been registered on the books of the Registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of Registration Signature of Registered Owner Officer of Registrar Cede & Co. Federal ID #13-2555119 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 B-4 EXHIBIT C TAX LEVY YEAR * TAX LEVY * Year tax levy collected. 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 C-1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. CITY OF MEDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Administrator -Clerk of the City of Medina, Minnesota (the "City"), do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on June 2, 2015, with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2015A, in the original aggregate principal amount of $1,765,000. WITNESS My hand officially as such City Administrator -Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 2015. City Administrator -Clerk City of Medina, Minnesota (SEAL) 462070v1 JAE ME230-612 Agenda Item # 7A NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial H ighway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, M N 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING MEMO To: Medina Mayor and City Council From: Nate Sparks Date: May 28, 2015 Re: Medina Country Club General Plan PUD / CUP Amendment / Site Plan Review File No: LR-15-155 Application Date: March 11, 2015 Review Deadline: July 9, 2015 (extended) REVISED PLANS At the May 19th City Council meeting, the Council tabled the application requesting that the applicant provide dormers, cupolas, window treatments, 3 lh feet of river rock on the bottom on the building, and a berm to elevate landscaping. These enhancements were to be considered in exchange for the City to allow the primary metal building material. The applicant has instead provided a new building design that does not use metal. The building elevation of the proposed new maintenance facility depicts a green vertical cement fiber board siding with shakes at the roof peak. These building materials are not prohibited by Section 828.04 in the same way that metal is. The applicant is not proposing to provide cupolas or dormers. COUNCIL ACTION The Council should review the revised building plan and determine if the revision is acceptable. If so, the plan may be approved in the attached resolution and ordinance. Attached Exhibits: A — DRAFT Ordinance approving PUD Amendment B — DRAFT Resolution authorizing publication of the ordinance C — DRAFT Resolution approving Site Plan Review and CUP D — Document List E — Previous Staff Report F — Applicant Narratives G — Plans CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE VILLAS AT MEDINA COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR THE MEDINA GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On January 6, 2015, the City Council of the City of Medina (the "City") adopted Ordinance No. 573, establishing a planned unit development (PUD) district for "Villas at Medina Country Club." Section 2. The City of Medina has subsequently received a request to amend the Villas at Medina Country Club Planned Unit Development District for property located at 400 Evergreen Road (the "Property") which is legally described as: Lot 29, Block 1, Villas at Medina Country Club, Hennepin County, Minnesota Section 3. Planned Unit Development Amendment - General Plan. A. A PUD General Plan of Development is hereby approved for construction for an approximately 5,000 square foot maintenance facility and two comfort stations on Lot 29, Block 1, Villas at Medina Country Club. The General Plan of Development shall be as shown on the plans received by the City on , except as modified within this ordinance. B. Any allowed uses and standards not specifically addressed by this Ordinance or Ordinance No. 573 shall be subject to the requirements set forth by the City of Medina Zoning Ordinance. Section 4. Performance Standards. For the purposes of this amended PUD District, the two maintenance facility structures south of the parking lot may allow for metal roofing materials, fiber cement siding, or other exterior materials which meet the general ordinance requirements. All other construction shall adhere to the requirements of the City of Medina Zoning ordinance and Ordinance No. 573 establishing the PUD District. Section 5. Construction Standards. The buildings constructed within this amended Planned Unit Development District shall comply with the requirements of the Medina Zoning Ordinance, except as may be modified by this ordinance or by Ordinance No. 573. Section 6. Ordinance No. 573 shall remain in full force and effect with the exception of the noted changes for Lot 29, Block 1, Villas at Medina Country Club. No other property within the PUD shall be affected. Section 7. A copy of this Ordinance and shall be kept on file at the Medina City Hall. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication and recording of the Villas at Medina Country Club plat. Adopted by the Medina City Council this 2nd day of June, 2015. CITY OF MEDINA By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: By: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk Published in the Crow River News on this day of June, 2015 Member _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance amending the "Villas at Medina Country Club" planned unit development district for the Medina Golf & Country Club; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is two pages in length; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city administrator -clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety, but only upon recording of the Villas at Medina Country Club plat: Public Notice The city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance amending the "Villas at Medina Country Club" planned unit development (PUD) district. The amendment to the PUD district permits construction of certain accessory structures at the Medina Golf and Country Club at 400 Evergreen Road. The amendment also permits some flexibility from general City standards related to exterior building materials. The full text and map exhibits of Ordinance No. ### are available from the city administrator -clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city administrator -clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in his office at city hall for public inspection and that he post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 2015-## June 2, 2015 Dated: June 2, 2015 Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: () Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2015-## 2 June 2, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2015- RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & SITE PLAN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AT THE MEDINA GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Medina Golf & Country Club (the "Applicant") operates the existing golf course and country club within the City located at 400 Evergreen Rd ("the Property") and legally described as: Lot 29, Block 1, Villas at Medina Country Club, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, on January 13, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 573, which zoned the Property as PUD, Planned Unit Development and established the Villas at Medina Country Club PUD; and WHEREAS, the Villas at Medina Country Club PUD District allows for commercial private/outdoor recreation as a conditional use upon the Property; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. ###, amending certain requirements of the Villas at Medina Country Club PUD district related to the Property; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has made an application for a conditional use permit and site plan review to construct a 5000 square foot maintenance facility and two 300 square foot comfort station buildings on the Property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the application on April 14, 2015 and recommended approval to the City Council, subject to certain terms and conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the application at the May 5, 2015, May 19, 2015 and June 2, 2015 meetings and reviewed the recommendation of the Planning Commission and city staff report and attached materials; and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: Resolution No. 2015- June 2, 2015 1. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. 2. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. 3. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. 4. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. 5. The use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. 7. Adjacent properties will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. 8. As conditioned, the proposed use conforms to the City's PUD Ordinance and the Villas at Medina Country Club PUD district. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby approves the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan with the following conditions: 1. The proposed development shall be done in accordance with the plans submitted by the Applicant on March 12, 2015 except as amended by this approval. 2. All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed. 3. All comments from the Building Official shall be addressed. 4. Additional landscape screening shall be provided in areas where the new structures are directly visible to adjacent residential areas. The revised landscaping plan is subject to review and approval by the City Planner. 5. Any proposed lighting shall be downcast and provide 0.0 FC of light at property lines. 6. Details on the trees to be removed and how they will be replaced shall be provided. 7. The final plat for the Villas at Medina Country Club shall be recorded prior to this approval going into effect. 8. All comments from the City Attorney shall be addressed. 9. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the Planned Unit Development and other relevant documents. 2 Dated: June 2, 2015. Attest: By: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member land upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 3 Project: LR-15-155 — Medina Country Club Maintenance Facility Site Plan Review The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 3/11/15 3/11/15 3 Yes yes Revised 4/6/2015 Fee 3/11/15 3/11/15 N/A Yes yes Copy of check at back of application Mailing Labels 3/11/15 3/11/15 3 Yes Yes Narrative 3/12/15 3/12/15 1 Yes Yes Plan Set 3/11/15 3/13/15 11 Yes Yes Plan set date is wrong Applicant response 4/2/2015 4/2/2015 3 Yes No Stormwater Management Summary 4/2/2015 2/24/2015 1 Yes No Photos of metal buildings 5/13/2015 6 Yes No Presentation 5/13/2015 20 Yes No Updated Maintenance Exteriors 5/28/2015 5/8/2015 1 Yes No Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Police Dept Comments 3/13/15 1 Yes Metro West Inspections 3/16/15 1 yes Transmittal sheet to distribute to DRC 3/12/15 1 yes Engineering Comments 3/26/2015 1 Yes Engineering Comments 4/3/2015 1 Yes Planning Commission report 4/8/2015 17 Yes 17 pages including attachments, w/o plans City Council report 4/28/2015 29 Yes 29 pages including attachments and plans City Council report Public Comments Document Date # of pages Electronic Planning Commission minutes 4/14/2015 City Council minutes 5/5/2015 City Council minutes 5/19/2015 Agenda Item # 8E NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial H ighway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, M N 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT To: From: Date: Re: File No: Medina Mayor and City Council Nate Sparks April 28, 2015 Medina Country Club General Plan PUD / CUP Amendment / Site Plan Review LR-15-155 Application Date: March 11, 2015 Review Deadline: July 9, 2015 (extended) BACKGROUND The Medina Golf and Country Club has made an application for a Planned Unit Development General Plan, Conditional Use Permit Amendment, and Site Plan Review to allow for the construction of a new maintenance facility and two accessory restroom facilities. SUBJECT SITE The subject site is the Medina Golf and Country Club at 400 Evergreen Road. City recently approved a rezoning to Planned Unit Development which allows for the golf course use as a conditional use permit. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is for a new 5000 square foot maintenance building and the two restroom facilities which are about 300 square feet each. The existing maintenance building on site is intended to be converted into a storage facility. The area where the new maintenance facility is proposed is to the south of the existing clubhouse parking lot and to the east of the existing maintenance facility. The two restroom buildings are proposed on the north end of the course. SITE PLAN REVIEW Building Location and Setbacks The site will be zoned PUD but the PUD ordinance defers the golf course use standards to that of the Public -Semi Public Zoning District. The setback requirements are 50 feet to the front and 30 for side and rear yards. The westerly restroom building is about 140 feet to the nearest lot line. The eastern restroom building is about 50 feet to the rear of one of the single family lots in the Villas. The maintenance facility is over 200 feet to the nearest property line. Building Design & Materials The proposed restroom facilities are intended to be painted wood siding. The roof is proposed with asphalt shingles. The maintenance facility is designed with a metal exterior and roof. The City's Zoning Ordinance Section 828.04 states acceptable exterior finishes for new commercial buildings within the City. Specifically, the section states that "metal may be used on a maximum of 20 percent of the visible exterior building surface, except that metal lap siding may be used in any amount on the exterior of residential - style accessory buildings not exceeding 4000 square feet of gross floor area." It also states that buildings with a roof pitch greater than 3/12 cannot be constructed with visible aluminum, iron, or steel roofing materials. The proposed structure has a roof pitch of about 6/12. In Section 825, it's stated that commercial accessory buildings must be constructed in a manner compatible with the materials and features of the principal building. The existing maintenance facility is made primarily of concrete block. The proposed project will place a new metal roof on this structure, as well. Building height is limited to 30 feet. The proposed structures all are less than 30 feet in height. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The restrooms are intended to be connected to the municipal sewer and water system. Details on these utility connections must be provided. The additional impervious surfaces related to the new maintenance facility exceed 5000 square feet. This amount requires stormwater management. The applicant has indicated that this may be treated by the stormwater system of the Villas development. However, the City Engineer has noted that the stormwater from this site will not reach the Villas as graded. Therefore, the proper stormwater management is necessary in the opinion of the City Engineer. The City Engineer's comments are attached for review. The applicant has stated that they have plenty of space to accommodate a stormwater improvement, but are more likely to remove some of the existing hardcover so that the increase in hardcover is less than 5000 square feet and stormwater management ordinance would not be triggered. Tree Removal & Replacement The maintenance facility construction will result in the removal of four trees. The applicant is proposing to plant nine new trees in the general vicinity. Details on the trees to be removed should be provided in order to determine if the replacement is acceptable. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW The addition of these facilities to the site requires a conditional use permit. In granting a conditional use permit, the City shall consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of occupants or surrounding lands. Among other things, City Officials shall consider the following: 1) That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. 2) That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. 3) That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 4) That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. 5) That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. 6) The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. 7) The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. 8) The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. 9) The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. 10) Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. 11) The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. 12) The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW As the site is zoned PUD, the proposed facilities require a PUD Amendment. In Section 827.25, the City states the purpose of a planned unit development. It states that the PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to zoning development standards is intended to encourage: 1) Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 2) Higher standards of site and building design. 3) The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4) Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low -impact development practices which result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of the City. 5) Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses. 6) A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and service facilities. 7) An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower development costs and public investments. 8) A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. PUDs are not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles. 9) A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. STAFF REVIEW In general, the uses of the maintenance facility and the restrooms are acceptable. However, there are concerns with the impact the structures may have on neighboring properties. The maintenance facility does not meet the City's typical building standards for a commercial accessory building. This is concerning due to the building's visibility from the residential area to the south. Because the property is zoned PUD, the City would have flexibility to deviate from the general standards of the zoning ordinance. However, such deviations should be allowed in order to support the purpose and intent of the PUD zoning district. The applicant has argued that the proposed materials will "complement but not compete with" the architecture of the other improvements on the site. Staff believes this description would not take into consideration the views from the south of the site, where the maintenance building will be prominent and the clubhouse will not. Staff believes that if deviation is to be considered, it may be worth reviewing alternative materials. Perhaps fiber cement (hardiboard) siding would provide a more residential feel instead of typical brick and concrete materials expected for commercial buildings. If City Officials are comfortable with the deviation from the typical building standards through the PUD process, staff would recommend a substantially higher degree of landscape screening provided. The restroom facilities are generally consistent with the requisite building standards. One of the restroom facilities will be placed in the view of the planned houses in the Villas development. Noting that the buildings are planned to be used as restrooms and will be equipped with security lighting, some additional landscaping may be appropriate. The more easterly restroom will be largely obscured by the preserved trees and may not be as great of a concern. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed the application at their April 14, 2015 meeting. Commissioners did not express concern related to the proposed metal building materials because of the very large size of the site and, with the exception of the City's salt shed, is over 350 feet from neighboring property and because they recommended additional landscaping so that the structure would not be visible from residential property. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the request with the following conditions: 1. All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed. 2. All comments from the Building Official shall be addressed. 3. Additional landscape screening shall be provided in areas where the new structures are directly visible to adjacent residential areas. The revised landscaping plan is subject to review and approval by the City Planner. 4. Any proposed lighting shall be downcast and provide 0.0 FC of light at property lines. 5. Details on the trees to be removed shall be provided. 6. The final plat for the Villas at Medina Country Club shall be recorded prior to this approval going into effect and any building permits being issued. 7. All comments from the City Attorney shall be addressed. 8. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the Planned Unit Development, site plan, and other relevant documents. Attached Exhibits: A — Excerpt from DRAFT 4/14/2015 Meeting Minutes B — Document List C — Engineering Comments dated 3/26/2015 and 4/3/2015 D — Building Official/Fire Marshal Comments dated 3/16/2015 E —Applicant Narratives F — Plans MEDINA GOLF & COUNT RY CLUB 12 March 2015 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 RE: Site Plan Review Medina Golf and Country Club Maintenance Facility Improvements and Comfort Stations Dear Mr. Finke: Medina Golf and Country Club will be losing a cold storage building with the proposed development on the west side of the property. The loss of the storage space and the need to update an older Maintenance Facility has produced the current plan being presented for Site Plan Review. This application includes a new 5,000 sf Maintenance Building, minor remodeling to the existing 6,000sf Maintenance Building and the addition of two Comfort Stations (toilet structures) on the golf course. The new Maintenance Building will accommodate a mechanics shop, chemical storage, staff offices, meeting space and staff toilets. The existing building will be converted to a cold storage facility for maintenance equipment. The flat roof will be replaced with a new pitched roof to aesthetically relate to the New Building, the Clubhouse and the campus. This project is designed to replace the square footage lost by the loss of the existing Barn, and will not affect the number of staff, hours of operation or change the current water or sanitary sewer usage. Campion Engineering has confirmed that the storm water management design for the adjacent housing development project has been designed with capacity to accommodate the additional 6,000 square feet of impervious surface resulting from this project. Thank you for consideration of our application. Sincerely, Scott Peterson President Medina Golf and Country Club Enclosure(s): Copy: File ( ) 763.478.6021 — Facsimile 763.478.6025 -- 400 Evergreen Road — Medina, MN 55340-2106 www.medinagolfcc.com MEMORANDUM COMM. NO.: CLIENT: PROJECT: SUBJECT: 2675.001.00 Medina Golf and Country Club (MGCC) Facility Improvements Response to City Review Comments City Project No: LR-15-155 MEMO BY: Mark Forsberg AIA DATE: 02 April 2015 COPY: Nate Sparks Planning Consultant City of Medina This memo is in repose to the Site Plan Review Comments received from the City of Medina on March 30, 2015 for the above referenced project. Nate Sparks, Planning Consultant City of Medina 763 231-2555 Al. The application form (attached) needs to be revised to include a request for a Planned Unit Development General Plan and Conditional Use Permit. Response: The application has been revised and attached as requested. A2. The City of Medina does not typically allow for metal commercial buildings. A narrative describing the justification for the flexibility from the City's standards to allow for this type of construction should be provided. Response: The applicant is proposing to use ribbed metal siding and roofing in an earth tone color palette that complements (but does not compete with) the existing Clubhouse and Pool Building. While metal commercial buildings may not typically be allowed in Medina, the Club feels that for the scale of this project, ribbed metal is more appropriate than precast concrete or CMU and more durable and maintenance free than painted wood siding. The buildings are "back of the house" facilities, not intended for direct use by Members or Guests, so replicating the architectural style of the Clubhouse in not appropriate. Furthermore, the buildings will be screened from view with landscaping from residential neighbors to the South East. RSP ARCH I T E C T S 1220 Marshall SteetNE Minneapolis, MN 55413.1036 612.677.7100 main 612.677,7499 fax www.rsparoh:com MEMORANDUM Response to City Review Comments 26 March 2015 Page 2 of 3 Tom Kellogg, City Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc 612-209-5113 B1. Stormwater improvements are required for any projects that construct over 5,000 square feet of new impervious surfaces. The plans note this project will result in a net impervious surface increase of 5,621 square feet. The plans should incorporate stormwater improvements in accordance with the City's Stormwater Design Manual. Response: The new impervious surface proposed in our submittal have City stormwater requirements that are being incorporated/accounted for within the Villas at Medina Country Club development stormwater treatment system as shown in attached stormwater management design computation sheet. These calculations have been engineered/computed by the adjacent development's design engineering company, Campion Engineering — 2/24/2015. B2. It appears the sanitary sewer and water main extensions may impact an existing wetland. The applicant should provide documentation to verify wetlands will not be impacted or acquire a wetland no -loss permit. Response: The applicant has contracted with Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company to locate and delineate the wetland in question. The field work can be completed in the next two weeks, and the requested documentation will be included with the building permit application. B3. The applicant should verb the proposed 4" watermain is sized to provide the required fire protection to the proposed and existing buildings. Response: The MEP systems will be "design build". The Mechanical design -builder will verify site utilities for the project to support their MEP design prior to submitting for permit. B4. The plans should show alignments and grades for the utility extensions required to serve the proposed rest rooms. Response: The sanitary sewer and water service will be designed and constructed by the adjacent residential developer under a separate contract. As noted on the Civil Drawings, "Final sanitary sewer and watermain service size and location invert elevation to be determined with the mechanical contractor and adjacent development engineer." MEMORANDUM Response to City Review Comments 26 March 2015 Page 3 of 3 Loren Kohnen, City Building Inspector Metro West Inspection Services, Inc 763-479-1720 C1. Both buildings existing and proposed may have to be fire sprinklered, one being new and existing because of change of use. Response: We anticipate the requirement for fire sprinklers in the proposed building. We are not expanding or intensifying the use of the existing storage building, and therefore do not believe sprinklers will be required. C2. Accessible parking and accessibility will be required for both buildings. Response: One accessible parking space will be provided adjacent to the employee entry of the proposed building. C3. The comfort stations appear not to be served by sanitary sewer or water, but can be permitted with use of holding tanks. All will have to be accessible. Response: The Comfort Stations are designed to be fully accessible. The sanitary sewer and water service will be designed and constructed by the adjacent residential developer under a separate contract. As noted on the Civil Drawings, "Final sanitary sewer and watermain service size and location invert elevation to be determined with the mechanical contractor and adjacent development engineer." ATTACHMENTS: Revised application form Stormwater management design computation sheet — Campion Engineering END OF MEMO lmJUSINI SLOZ-a MOEN LL S10 3LAE Kamen 0ugsq 3Apagsa V, agAs 133HS a3A03 uollduosaa MO 'oN 51.10M11811 pauasa.tt0,11V ZLPL a1,wi,K,S.40un0oa npoN si,4141lmeauepmse ui /yuolauuosiatl aago pue wopuan 'saiauge pawwanoll 'voyawluoJ sweipsum swailo Aq uogenlena pup mainw P1.11 4 algepelewe espy) dSH }o uolssund uwluensswtive,nok, ',Jed 111.10 el04m w Tepold»a 14,131awuma Japaiealtlnp Valtlwaq pue laelaucl. we Iowa, slapow pue ..ytle. 's0uimwp lealuyaw Ile OulPnPu1 ula�ay pagnasappueumayssu0lsap a41 30110N S lOZ/El/EO plea JW Ag payoM NV1 Ag KAKI 00•006'SL9Z -pN laaia,d J')Q�I��� 1p9Laalwd plea JagwnN uogegsKag a/nleu015 -elasauw.W }o ale1S ayl }a smel ayl Japun loaINKV pasuaaq Aro a we ley) pue uolsKadns lowly Aw KKK ID aw Aq pa,edad sem Amcla,,a oge opads Tool KII ley) KKao Agway I esgeommo sKa4nsuoa W.113 edS1'MMM 4e166401L9ZI9 OOLCU3Z19 9£01.-£14S5 e1050u040 spodeaumw 3N 10a11S 11£0£/)M OZZI slaan9.V dSN E SNOI1VA31330VHO.LS 0100 Z04V £ SNOI1VA313 A11110Vd 3041VN31NIVW LOW E SNOI1VA313 V SNV1da001d SN011V.LS 1HOdW00 ZOLV £ SNVlda00ld 1V84110311HOaV LOW £ NVld 3dVOSONV1 8 311S 1Van10311H0HV ZOOV E NVld 311S 3131d1400 LOOV anK014101V 40 £ S11V130 L'Z0 E Z# NOI1V1S1H0AW00- NV1d ONIOtllJO E'L0 £ L# NOI1V.LS1a03W00-NVId ONIOV'HO VI/0 £ ONIOlIn830NVN31NIVW-NVld Allllln a ONIOVUO L'L0 11A10 ZO £ 133HS a3A00 0000 laaua0 00 I 42 p <_ T 3WVN. SNOISIA3a ON - NOVd ale HOlad V WOHA 030SSI-3a 4 A1N030N3a3d3a- Noiiona1SN00 HOd 10N E (3an1VNOIS Him) 031-ISS1-3a ONV 03SIA3a Z (3an1VNO13 HIIM) a3nssi I. 'ON 133HS nam 3nssi 53nssi SONIMVia X30N1133HS M31/0:1 NVld 311S -1d1111AI8f1S L1110:39d)13Vd SOH/Cl/CO :011SS1 39VX3Vd irkomn000 AlIVININ 1S 3003 NOLLISNYS1 HSINIH HSINId d0 1N31X3 H11M OV1 HSINIA (HSINId 21001d) S30Vdans1111 (FIS1N133SV9) -Otll HSINId (1i$IN181,W) OVl HOOD OV11N3Wd11103 OV1 MOONIM 310NA34 ZO-1d0' L0-1d0 OV1N01103S omminB Lida LOA Lld1 LEA 11Nd nZ CZ ZL 0/3Hv wood) AS 051. OVl WOOH Ia39wnd meal LOL ) (BONN wood) 31/11VN WOOa 30N3a3d3a 11V130 HO NV1d 030atl1N3 (-----, ) l 1 IE v Otll N01103S TVM l OV111V130 M31A 3ldlllnW - OVl NOLLVA313 M31A 310NIS - OVl NOI1VA313 MOHIAV H1HON 31111 ONIMVHO \v/ WIS OVl N01111atld L 3ON31,13d38 NIS NOISIA3a WIS H1210N H1210N .0-.t =.8II 3WVN M31A NOI1tlA31310AS OV113A31 / NOI1VA313 .0-,OOL='13 Y ONIlOOd' 0-96 =131 O'1 XXX/X 33S 3NI1 HO1VW 3NI1 HO1VW ONIISIX3 - 3NI1 alao ao Nwmoa M3N - 34111 01210 a0 Nwmoo I i O O S108WAS 9NImnia Nt/ld A3H dt1W NO111l001 wooliaedsJOJausppei :0e0/3 L6 LL-LL921/9 auoyd 1141411/tl 0/4101 V404 1 pal wooKmeds/g6Jags/oppew 010.03 BOEL-LL9219 auoyd Ja6eue144,04110JV lae(ad tuegs/AA ,)Jew 001.L-LL921.9 auoyd ledlouud'HoegloN p(ne0 664L-LL921.9:xed OOLL-LL9/Z1.9 :euoVd ELVSS NV1'000deauulW 3N 1aa1S I1e4ae1,1 OZZL 'Pll'4110040/V ASH wooauNJl@@aouewlenb)i 04) 3 0689-80�S2L9 : 4d uelwen0 KIN 44Z9-068/ZS6 )14A 4409-068296:400yd LESS NW'alllnsu,n8 OZ L#'Z4 Pa N1uno0104M OOSZ '401'IIIH a sawep SM33NI91.1311A10 woolleLupyOsnueuJow6e :Ilew3 ESLZ-8£Z/E9L :auoyd KapuaWlJadns'snuewaw up3 Koppel,' dm'uosmiad 4004 LZ09-8L4/£9L :auoyd MSS NW'eulPaW PH 04a6J4^3 004 gn10 /Kuno° S }IoO eulpaW 10311H021tl 213NM0 INV31103P01Id 00'006'6LE :1:1381M1N 103r0Hd dSa (MSS NW "VNIa3W Od N33d91:13A3 OOti SNOLLV1S 11:10d1A103 A11113Vd 33NVNIINIVV\I amp AELLW103 J109 VNICI3IN Medina Gait' & Country Chub. — Medina Gplt & Country OAP Evel Tee 4d -'1 55 i GOLF COURSE SITE PLAN NORTH COMFORT STATIONS 14TH HOLE - TEE 4TH HOLE - TEE CLUBHOUSE 3RD HOLE - GREEN EXISTING CART PATH COMFORT STATION EXISTING MAINTENANCE FACILITY - NEW COLD STORAGE NEW MAINTENANCE FACILITY 4TH HOLE - TEE 14TH HOLE - TEE COMFORT STATION OCOMFORT STATION #1 SITE PLAN 13TH HOLE - GREEN \ EXISTING CART PATH OCOMFORT STATION #2 SITE PLAN 20' 0' SEE DRAWING A102 SEE DRAWING A102 20' NORTH NORTH ASP Architects 1220 Marshall Street NE 612.677.7160 Minneapolis 612.677.7499 fax Minnesota 55413-1036 www.rsparch.com Consultants Cerullo anon I hereby terrify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Registration Number Date Project No. Drawn By Checked By 2675.900.00 TAK MF Date 03/13/15 NOTICE Th designs shown and described heroin maid, oil technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot to oaredduuhoaredor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express cotter permission of MP Advt., . These are available for anted review and evaluation by clients. consultants. contractors. government agencies vendors and office personnel anly in accordance whh this Nctwe. Ph Copyright ASP Architects 2012 All rights reserved Revisions No. Date Description MAINTENANCE & COMFORT STATIONSITE PLANS SCALE : 1"= 20'-0" diFrvv I 5 A001 Sbl£Z 'ON io3road 0Sti l£Z 3-113 dVO SNOISIA3a 31V4 >WO A8 NMVaO 0D VNIGHNI -0 N CO = O z o m � 4 N tc0 0 QI -P. A CO 0 X <a N CO 0 N 4. CO z J r D w+ Z iY Z m Cn rn z c� Z rn 70 N C ▪ � 70 O rn Taal OZ - y99l t 09 Ob OZ 1333 NI 31V0S D N0110091SN03 1S0d-1109018/30N33 40"1 111S-903310 H0110 03S0d099 NOI10r91SN001S0d- r� NOI103109d 80 03S0d099 N0110naisNOD 30 191V1S 01 9019d- 901103108d 80 03S0d0991 N0110091SN03 3O 19V1S 01 80I8d-30N33••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••«••••• 11IS A1119-1,AV3H 03S0d09d 03A01139 39 Ol 3391 ONLSIX3 30V1d OS 11VHdSV 03S0d0Nd 30V3anS 31390N00 03S03093 NOILVA313 10dS 03S03093 311na3S 93M3S AdV1INVS 03S0d0991 331883S NIV8931VM 03S0d09d 93M3S 89015 03S0dOdd 8001N00 03S0d09d an01N00 ONOSIX3 11VM ONINIV1391 ONIISIX3 earn 91\111SIX3 S3391 ONIISIX3 30N3d 01,111SIX3 331 011IISIX3 N3390 ONIISIX3 93)INn8 0NI1SIX3 V39V 3dV3S0NV1 01,1IISIX3 AdONVO 9NIallne ONIISIX3 ONI0lIn8 9NI1SIX3 30V390S 31390N00 ONIISIX3 30V3911S 11VHdSV ONIISIX3 NOLVA313 ONIISIX3 1113A SVO ONIISIX3 310H ONVH SVO ONIISIX3 and SVS ONLLSIX3 931319 SVO ONIISIX3 18011 011110910 ONIISIX3 1801113391E ONIISIX3 931/1903SNV91 31910313 01\1IISIX3 1V1S303d 01810313 9NI1SIX3 93M3S 89101S ONIISIX3 93M3S 1,9V11NVS ONIISIX3 NIVW931VM DNIISIX3 00'000Ix «< 000I oo 000 Lx LLc 0 4N3031 NOILVA313 7p NOLLV301 AJI213A OL 9013V llNO3 13N38 •4/1 I1-.4 �P f.•_ 'AO 4 3A331S ONIddV1 i HLIM d10 .9 X3 dVl 13/A j s; sb6 NOLLtlA313 8 NOLLV301 Ad913A 01 9013ViLLN03 64'9L6 ANI 23XSVO 1Y3S-N-90N KIM 103NN00 ONV MISS X3 11190 3903 64'"L6 ANI ZL'1,86 al HWSS X3 •• • 9S'S96 ANI Sad 3d0H „bZ Xa OS786 ANI OS'Z96 ANI 00'066 39 (V10 .80 L MSS 0 • ••f� '••e • f••r. f e6s O �4'0 3dOH .4Z X3-,9L 3A0W38 G0166 .4Z ANI 6 38 - - - (NIStlB NItl210 3521f100 dlOO)OLO'96Ol HW80 ELM 3d0H .4Z X3 01 _ .33NN03 X' 1311,11 LN3- �� •••••.«w•••«••••••••w•pi• f- 014 ON4/ •S4-.y0 1 L N///.Sl) LS b� a w IJ .b \ ays W dO1S /4••• / NOLLV90d00.1/l 1 ' 7"4.$ / Z'L.: t13 ONO / P 3A1VA Id .4 'N• / £'L66 A313 ONO %6J/ Gana t, (31153W00) 93dd00 X 3d11 .Z/L 1 N� V� , c Z0 1001 0 '0'®'® r, _ X^� 09'L66 ANI a \\ onid 3Ad .9 ?r ./, 41,1%'OS f (39L4) ZSl3 d10 .L F 9Z' LOOI r � - ��lool 3d� ,, 01 nNlaiIne � 30NVN31NIVW' 03S0(3(Md 6. `� �, 9Z'LOOL 6. O, 9C866 \ 9l'l00 4,.. 108 3 d01 0 OS'L66 X3 96'L66 X3 03sodoaosa NISnamvir.L01e OtILLs x3 3A01139 9Z'LOOL 9Z'1001 3V 99'£66 .4Z ANI 99'£66 .4Z ANI BS'966 39 (NISVI3 NIV210 3Sanao dlOO)LOL HW83 666 3 9Z'1004- 3V 9Z'LOOL 3V ZS'666 x X3 •21010V81N00 H11M 311S NO 03NIIN83130 38 01—NOLLV001 3ONVaLN3 N01.101)211SN00 NOON 13NNV18 10211,100 NOISON3 ONV 033S 1-111M 03HSI18V1S3 210 03000S ONV 110Sd01 'NIW „b HIM OVRIdS321 38 Ol V321V 03821f11S1O 11V H1180 X3 3A01.436 1Z'b66 ANI L0'966 3S HN83 X3 60'1001- 3V 9Z'10017 3V -_ 9Z'100L"t 3V 9Z'1001 3tl 60'1001 3V "SXNV1 SVO 8 S8V1S 31383NO3 ONLLSIX3 3A0W39 9Z'1001 85 000 9Z' 1001 9Z1001. I. 100I X3 00'1001 ZZ'1001 3tl r / z 9Z'000 L 9Z'1001 3tl x 9£'0001 O� 9413001. '21013V81NO3 1VOINVH331A1 RUM 03N11183130 38 Ol 3ZIS 1,1011VA313 $1011V001 301AN3S N31VM N3M3S '8 3dll 38V 311S NIH11M S110S 11V (NIVO 13N) dS lZ9'S—Sf)OIA213d1^11 03S0d0Nd 3dOH .4Z X3-,£11 3A0W39 S£'000 Sb'000 L ZZ' 1001 3V ZZ'LOOL 3tl °main] ]ONVNaNIVIN ONIlSIXA � � I / I \ 1 1 \ I \ \ \ I II ________Lzboolx._ i dH X3 1 1 I I 1 �S310N £8'966 ANI 81183 X3 O1 133NN00 59'S66 ANI 98'666 a HW83 X3 3S L£L-NOLL03NNOO 93M3S 11901S 90d 31390N00 ONLLSIX3 33tl1d39 8 3A0W39 la966 ANI 49'666 3 HW83 X3 r�/+� \ \\ 1 2 \ I I r / 1 / / / / / \ \ / V /I I I I a I A I • I I I I I wd«zo slot/ll/£' — 6MP 9sbl�z\sNvid wNid\sb sz\spalwd as 11^!3— \ A I 7 I I z Q \23145\FINAL 0 EX 8" PVC a" Pvc � o7 ___ FAIRWAY DRIVE — Ex .aa% � --7 I --------7 J •*N.. I 1 1 I I I I I T 1 1 1 I 1 EX SSMH RE 1018.26 INV NE 999.97 INV W 999.87 JG I \ I I I I / " HOPE SERVICE LJNE I FINAL SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN SERVICE SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION TO BE DETERMINED WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR AND ADJACENT \ DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER. 3' \ `\i// - - - -\ 4' PVC SERVICE LINE INV ® PROP_ LINE 1006,5 (REVISE TO INV. 1001.0) \ / .< \ v \v v V v \ \ 1_ I \ I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 \ 1 \\ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS-300 SF (NET GAIN) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LOCATION -TO BE DETERMINED ON SITE \ \ \ \ LEGEND x,00a.00 - cur EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING ELECTRIC PEDESTAL EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER EXISTING STREET LIGHT EXISTING GROUND LIGHT EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING GAS PUMP EXISTING GAS HAND HOLE EXISTING GAS VENT .EXISTING ELEVATION EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING CANOPY EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA EXISTING BUNKER EXISTING GREEN EXISTING TEE EXISTING FENCE EXISTING TREES EXISTING CURB EXISTING RETAINING WALL -100C- - EXISTING CONTOUR 1000 PROPOSED CONTOUR >—(10— PROPOSED STORM SEWER NOTES: PROPOSED CONCRETE SURFACE PROPOSED ASPHALT SURFACE PROPOSED HEAVY-DUTY SILT ...«...«........... FENCE -PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION ALL SOILS WITHIN SITE ARE TYPE B. ALL DISTURBED AREA TO BE RESPREAD WITH 4" MIN. TOPSOIL AND SODDED OR ESTABLISHED WITH SEED AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. WITH CONTRACTOR. JCALE IN FEET _C 40 60 I-nch = 20 feet N 0 w � CC C V) CL� W W Z C-0 Z M z s m' 2500 W. Orr. RD. 42, Sulh 120, PHONE: (952)890-6044 DRAWN BY CJK DATE 3/11 /15 REVISIONS CAD FILE 23145C PROJECT NO. 23145 C1.2 £'LO Sb l£Z "ON 1031'02Id OSti l£Z 3-11d OVO SNOISIn321 S l/ l l/£ 31V0 Aro A8 NMV2l0 4-1 M N 0 VVV 0 a D v pa d °.�.y 0 2 V r-i D ,.,o A m rn1� o V� ! Z m(...)AC ZRN' �x §N� zH moo -u 1-3n o En H sA z� g oz W n tri 4409-068(M6) :3N0Hd NJ CP 0 I n * ZCO m 23 N N \'A N piv+ z M r7 -n ry Z 2-o fTl x 44Z9-068(ZS6) rn 73 m c u) 9 \ = M C z 70 .. CP m cw 0 N ' l oz ___ NI 3IVDS 0 '8010VN1N00 HUM 31IS NO 03NIIN83130 39 01-N011V001 3ONV81N3 N0110081SN00 NOON '13NNV19 10211N00 NOIS083 ONV 033S HUM 03HS119V1S3 210 03000S OW 110Sd01 'NIW „b HIIM OValdS3N 39 01 V321V 039801SI0 11V '9 3c1A1 38V 311S NIHIIM S110S 11V (NIVO 13N) dS 00£-S001/\83d1611 03S0d0Nd Noiiond15N0O 30 AVIS 01 dOldd-33N33 11IS A100-AAV3H 03S0dOdd Mk/And 11VHdSV 03S0dOdd 30Vdd H5 313dON00 03S0dOdd d3M3S WdO1S 03S0dOdd N001N00 03S0dOdd df101NO3 ONLSIX3 IIVM ONINIV13d ONLSIX3 MOO ONLSIX3 S33d1 ONLSIX3 30113d 91\111SIX3 331 ONIISIX3 N33dO 91111SIX3 d3NNf19 ONUSIX3 V3dV 3dVOSONV1 ONLSIX3 AdONVO ONIane ONLSIX3 ON10If1H 9NLSIX3 33V3df1S 313d3N00 ONLSIX3 3JV3df15 11VHdSV 91111_5IX3 NOIIVA313 ONLSIX3 1N3A SVO ONIISIX3 310H (MIA SVO ONIISIX3 dWfld SVO ONIISIX3 631311 SVO ONIISIX3 1HOII ONnoao ONION] 1 1011 133211S ONIISIX3 2,131^1d03SNVdl OR110313 ONLSIX3 1V153a3d 01d133I3 ONLSIX3 d3M35 MO'S 9NLSIX3 d3M3S AdV11NVS ONLSIX3 NIVWd3.VM ONLSIX3 <-0—< OOOL 00 0001x 0 0 7S 0 CIN3011 z :S310N I I 1 I 1 \ / I I I I / ' I I I I I I / I I / I I / I I / I I / I 1 / I 1 / I I / 1 I / I 1 / 1 1 / 1 1 / 1 1 / 1 1 / 1 \ / 1 \ / \ 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ 1 \ \ 1 / / 1 / / '1 / / V A I / / \ \ I // // \ \ I / / / v )7 / v v 'I / \A -- 1 / .2133 N IO N3 1 N3 W d013A30 moor av aMd 21010` aLN00 3dOINb'H031^1 RUM 03N11183130 38 O1 N011`dn313 183AN1 OMd 3ZIS 301n213S NI` 112131VM ONd M3S 1VN13 Ol-SOOI 3 ANI 00S001 M ANI 8Z'OZO l 3d HWSS X3 \ — /...-- r — / / / / / / / \ %WO ® 3Ad „9 X3 1 1 1 I I I I / / / 3N11 30IAd3S 3d0H „L \ \—\ \I 11 \ \-- \ �,/ v mm- —\\ -7 \'`, \ \ \ \ I 11 ,I, I I.m ';,`' / / R� \ -_ A / \ // \\ / / \ \ \ / // \tm- // ./\ o/ / / I /I / 7 \ / -i, / / mm -.�-� yo i- I / / 1.° -=�-r 1 I I I I / / / / / / R' 1 l}� NN xoo LzoL // / / /1 N9001. 3N11 'dedd 0 ANI 3N11 33IAd3S 3Ad „1, OVO2i SOOOM 331\1MVHS I 1 I I I \ v 1 I I I I I I I / / \ 1 I I I 7 I WdL0,Z0. SLOZ/ll/£' — bMP'Ogi,SZ\SNVid IVNH s COLD STORAGE BALL WASHER 120 COLD STORAGE 122 Tom. II _- III PARTS 118 ) PARTS 779 ) Ark A40 TOF 14x12 14x12 4x12 SHOP ( „4 ) 4x,2 GRINDING I 103 J OFFICE/PARTS ( 1o4 ) OFFICE MIIDROOM 105 I / MENS TOILET j RIM Y�/OMENS f TOILET LAUND 109 ) [d SHOWER n2 ) r1F1/ OFFICE EMPLOYEE STORAGE_ ( 1 2 ) 31 LOCKERS MECH COLD STORAGE & TURFGRASS FACILITY OFLOOR PLAN 1/8,1'-0" \ 53'-11" REF. Oo OW hI BREAK ROOM ( toe ) STORAGE ( 117 ) CHEMICAL ( 107 ) 4 8' 4' 0' B' 16' SCALE : 1/8" =1'-0" r gir TRUE NORTH RSP Architects 1220 Marshall Street NE 612.677.7100 Minneapolis 612.677.7499 fax Minnesota 55413-1036 www.rsparch.com Consultants Gni:s oat, on I hereby certify that this plan, specification or reportwes prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota: Signature Registration Number Date Project For .r'PIk CA 4.1 r.."1 V coul•C`L` Project No. Drawn By Checked By 2675.900.00 TAK MF Date 03/13/2015 NOTICE_The designs. ahem and described herein including all technical drawings, graphgs, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot he cooed, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole us in part, wMON espress written permission of ASP Archie. These are anilable iodinated renew and evaluation by clients. contractor, go0mmem agencies, vendors and Aloe personnel only in accordance with the Notice. 0 Copyright OSP Architects 2010 All rights reserved. Revisions No. Date Description ARCHITECTURAL FLOORPLANS CAPevit Projects Existing Maintenance -2015_TKisner n 3/11/2015222.04PM A101 00V Wd 6ZEZZ 510ZAllie W',auslyy 9lOZ - gsueualuppy 6mis!esiaa1a1d UnaUVO .0-,OZ =.l 1 3lVOS NVId 3dV3SONVI 8 311S lVani3311H3HV uo0p3sad Kea 'ON 110ARMAH Pam.,.yae uv AMA. 1.00 dSld .003 0 enoN 011410 a uep,oaaa m, Aryo lauu saay}o pue sioN0 A 01, auawwanoB 's 0009uou010. P.AA00 paiwy0 alyepe. ae esayluoAI A1,1,s d5N ;o uoisawatluayum ssa 0nsq, 'yetl w10 a,oymw 'pd,OPa IElllawWOa so paamltlnp 10,o ap louueo We Asewudod ae pa,a Appou p e 'ssiyUaB 's00AA,10.0.111A 09.10',00IPaquxap P. 004 s010P ,6 3110N SIOZ/EG/EO also iw Ae palasg0 NV1 AS unosdo 00'006'5L9Z 'oN laalo,d Kea ,agw% uape„slOae amlau6!s waosaumyy to alalS ayilo smel agl,apun laanga,V Ramp Alnpawe Pep pue umswados law AI Japun,o aw Aq pe,ada,d sent uodea uopeappads weld Siyl imp Apyaa Aga,ayl SWsye31103 woayoledsrmmm 9EOl-E1499 eloseuum xe1664L'LL971.9 sgodeauum OOLL'LL971.9 3N leeAS lla4slaW OZZI slaeiR.A/ dS9 HlaON anal .04 .0Z .o .01. .OZ 83103dS 90d laVHO 33S - S33a1 M3N 93103dS 90d laVHO 33S - S331:11 M3N v .LLI110Vd M3N d0 N01101191SN00 90d 03A01(439 39 11IM S1391 `JNIISIX3 4:310N NIVW3a Ol 93391 ONIISIX3 S3103 O laVHO 33S S33a1 M3N 1 it N1VM301S 31390N00 nR6 / I Sf10NIWf1119 ONIISIX3 0 0 N 30V 101S C1100 01N1 ceaciOW JNlanln8 30VN31NIb'W ONIISIX3 NIVW39 Ol S332:11 ONIISIX3 SnONIWnll9 M3N — A11-110`dd J 30N`dNaLNI 'W M3N JI , �I I I I I I I I �I I I I S30tldS WAN, b 3A0W39 101 ON1>12:1Vd ONIISIX OO CO � I O O O 3 NVId 3dV0S0NV1'9 311S ivan10311HOLIV .97 SN30Ned V3OId 30eUdS OCIVH0100 Z SO .S'Z VIVSN30 VOI1Vl0 VSOld 39eildS SIIIH NOV18 l S9 ,€ AVINAM 01VN00.- dS S(IIVW- 31ddtleV419 NVWAM aivNOa Z OQ .4 vivinoIlomi-VSNILIAS- OV11133e13S3NVdtlf l if .4 .4NN31S.- IINVVJ38d X 839V-31dVW VNNSIS 4 WS .4 SOOOMH1bON.- meant/ 839V- 31dVW SOOOMHILION Z WN 3ZIS 3WVN 1VOINV10e/N01/0109 A11NVf10 A351 T1na3HOS ON11NV1d ,aod 9001- Elmo ONUS I 0 COMFORT STATION FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR ar•0' C) SOUTH ELEVATION IW . 1'lf A nnnnlii riin`rmn1I.- n. i1V111111111r1; 11111111111111fH._ .. NOTE: ALL MATERIALS ON COMFORT NOTE: ALL MATERIALS ON COMFORT STATIONS WILL MATCH E70STING CLUBHOUSE STATIONS WILL MATCH EXISTING CLUBHOUSE ATTIC VENT ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF SECURITY LIGHTS UNDER CANOPY PAINTED WOOD COLUMNS PAINTED WOOD DOOR WITH FROSTED GLAZING CONCRETE SLAB FIRST FLOOR 1V•0- C) EAST 8 WEST ELEVATIONS ATTIC VENT ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF EXTERIOR WINDOW WITH FROSTED GLAZING PAINTED WOOD SIDRIG - PANTED WOOD TRIM AL FIRST FLOOR Y OP • o' NORTH ELEVATION C �j Irr.ro i1JH111111 rr1t1n1111 .-4111 11,1 21.1, O' SCALE:In•� /SP ischitecta 1220 Martha 11&TOM NE 812677.7100 Mmneapahs 81287734991as M.nnesola S3413-1= wontreperchcom Comallnts I11113,m ). Mn PA plan. speacaeen or mat rra Pawed W mew wds m/ dimd. smerO on and lhet I am a Piv helped Aghrvtr a•d. the R..E et due Omfe d hlmgga S1eea.rt Reemremal Rumua DAL 205.900.00 O r`.. By ONeeked N O lga. TAK MF 03/13/15 .N-aaf NAK...m.N0eload....bR91al 1ni+1PM+0Y. W.r.a. 000....n Vm.Sf Hum M�a4 Jplcsnw .....Wp RP Ru max R. 0 am10. bImmS m.w.e .rueoeW.A.n 1.004 ea.v.s m,.mawgoo. +.Va 00110.10.n0..h ®a.Q.aAe.xa. G ra..000,0100•20r2 .04.00n..4 Reviews No. Oats Oaseliption COMFORT STATION FLOORPLAN & ELEVATIONS POLHAAMadrmt MIA touVW DPARe.iffrolee Shelter AT 3ft012111F 7.1227PM A102 0 11 8 3 4111111 11n111i. ......0111111111111 ■111■11111. �f ,Jr1ma ■Irlm■1 yin. 1r11■111m1 11■11111N 1lilli'A11A�> r �Almn /■111m111111 11m111m111#I 111X1h: .,4111111111111 1111■111n■1111 11111■11111■111 ■1111I111Il ;; .iAm11r1r1111111 irm■111m111 ■111■1■111(I■n 11■11■�tru1 �.o.��_ nrr�.r..n.u. d NORTH ELEVATION - ALT #1 14 4 118" = r-0" SOUTH ELEVATION - ALTERNATE #1 4 15 i L1 �11 1�,. all 111 ■111�IGIIiI1�u 11■111m11111■1 11■111m11rm � � n■Irllmllnl IIn�1111■1111I _, 1�11■ 19.1.1PIIIIIEM J LIllrl■111I■Ir1 11 1/8" = 1'-C" KEYNOTES - ALTERNATE #1 NO. DESCRIPTION 1 METAL ROOF - MATCH EXISTING CLUBHOUSE COLOR 2 FIBER CEMENT SHINGLE SIDING - MATCH EXISTING CLUBHOUSE STYLE AND COLOR 3 ALUM CLAD WINDOW - MATCH BASE BID WINDOW 4 INSULATED OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR 5 FIBER CEMENT TRIM, SEE DETAILS AT PORTICO FOR REFERENCE ON DESIGN 6 FIBER CEMENT SMOOTH SIDING W/ CEMENT FIBER VERTICAL BATTENS - MATCH EXISTING CLUBHOUSE STYLE AND COLOR 7 FIBER CEMENT 1X8 TRIM AT CORNERS AND BASE - MATCH EXISTING CLUBHOUSE STYLE AND COLOR 8 FIBER CEMENT 1X4 TRIM AROUND DOORS & WINDOWS - MATCH EXISTING CLUBHOUSE STYLE AND COLOR 9 ALUM CLAD DOOR & WINDOW - MATCH EXISTING CLUBHOUSE STYLE AND COLOR 11 METAL GUTTERS 12 DOWNSPOUT 13 HOLLOW METAL DOOR - MATCH EXISTING CLUBHOUSE STYLE AND COLOR 14 CANOPY - METAL ROOF, WD FRAME CONSTRUCTION, LIGHT AT UNDER SIDE OF CANOPY. SEE BASE BID DRAWING FOR SIMILAR DESIGN 15 FIBER CEMENT 1X8 TRIM AROUND OVERHEAD DOOR 0 117 r EAST ELEVATION - ALT #1 5 2 11 118" = ,.1111Q1 ,r11111■Ir11 allnmrn■111 1■11111■11111■1 mmmalm 1111■11111■1111 1111111111111111111 iiiimunnn nli :"lnmiri�ml Inmrut11u11�l IrnlMunlrmnlnr ' i.: \ 7-4 WEST ELEVATION - ALTERNATE #1 ^. I8' = 11: 1111111i._ . um■nlrr:. -.� I ■n111■nlm�t n■n1�1■nlmi Ilt�, l�l Ilmnlmin■� mm�. • I lnm1n11■nl ■nln■i�A 111m1n1�■n Imrn 111111111111111 ur1■10 � [15 SUMMARY OF ALTERNATE #1: AT NEW MAINTENANCE FACILITY INSTEAD OF BASE BID OF METAL EXTERIOR FINISH, ALTERNATE #1 IS A DESIGN SIMILAR TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE EXISTING POOL HOUSE. THE EXTERIOR MATERIALS FOR ALTERNATE #1 CONSISTS OF CEMENT FIBER SIDING AND TRIM. THE CEMENT FIBER WOULD BE PAINTED SIMIALAR TO THE POOL HOUSE. EXTERIOR FINISHES PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURED BUILDING SUPPLIER. AT EXISTING COLD STORAGE BUILDING. INSTEAD OF BASE BID OF METAL EXTERIOR FINISH AT THE NEW GABLES, ALTERNATE #1 IS USING CEMENT FIBER SIDING FOR A FINISH. THE CEMENT FIBER WOULD BE PAINTED SIMIALAR TO THE POOL HOUSE. EXTERIOR FINISHES PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURED BUILDING SUPPLIER. RSP Architects 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis Minnesota 55413-1036 612.677.7100 612.677.7499 fax www.rsparch.com Consultants Certification I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Robert Lucius Registration Number 14066 Date Project For 05-15-2015 �Q PERMIT SET Project No. Drawn By Checked By 2675.001.00 TAK MF Date 05/08/2015 NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. CO Copyright RSP Architects 2012. All rights reserved. Revisions No. Date Description EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - ALTERNATE #1 M -A06 CMevitProjects\ExistingMaintenance -2015 tkisner.M 5/27/2015 3:42:42 PM Ai' TRUSS BEARING Ii114' • 0' Aph_FIRST FLOOR ICU-0' EXISTING - NORTH 1AT • 1TF TRUSS BEARING 114' -0 FIRST FLOOR 100-8 NEW O.H. DOOR PAINTED TO MATCH DOORS ON NEW FACILITY' 03 \ E%iSTING - SOUTH =ice EXISTING WINDOWS EXISTING O-H. DOORS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH DOORS ON NEW FACRRY u i EXISTING DOOR TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH 0 H. DOORS NEW METAL SIDING TO MAYOR NEW FACILITY HEW METAL ROOF EXISTING PLYWOOD FASCIA TORE DEMOLISHED +TRUSS BFMING N ;IT .0" EXISTING CAW TG OE PAINTED TO MATCH NEW FACILITY �FI1p0 -RSTD' FLOOR © ❑ El 1 EXISTING WINDOWS + 2 EXISTING - EAST ,s� NEW METAL SIDING TO MATCH NEW FACILITY NEW METAL ROOF EIISIING PLYWOOD FASCIA TORE DEMOLISHED EXISTING CMU TO DE PAINTED TO MATCH NEW FACILITY AL TRUSS BEARING \ iA' - 0' FIRST FLOOR 01Y-0' EXISTING OH. DOOR TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH DOORS ON NEW FACILITY 4 EXISTING -WEST tar '=FA. DEMOLISH EXISTING O.H. DOORS INFILL WITH MATCHING CAW NEW DOOR PAINTED TO MATCH DOORS OF NEW FACILITY NEW 0 H DOOR S DOOR PAINTED TO MATCH DOORS OF NEW FACILITY 6 0' 1B SCALE: I-0. ASAP kahiteces 1229 Marshall Slieal NE 812.677.71N0 Minneapahs 81267734991ex Mlnnesola S3413-1= wrna.rap}rch-cnm Cwaalluts OptIncriee. I Iete7ViceRfy Mal aArs Pam. speaRaten a resat was prepared Inv mew order ery dlred. nawann and that I azs o Div bleed Arthu I nefde PH lass ad dle Aara al Hammer Svulprt RagaInman lNa6K Datr 2615.900.00 Dr`. BT Nnecbd N Due TAK MF 03/13)2015 tN-aR �a5+g4Main eH0xe0.1.1..3UM4YVWeYAr+p. Pao.. nPAA 1M. ee pug., Mc.e3 Oakiaa w a.ew.mna n.raaa nen +elwlnenPenmenmeaaip PS/.hdn .. Tien re rsu it reeror.e wyueuebrnMh make. rMP. m..imwgooa main emmrn Pn,nnr a+n n ®aene.aAlte Rare G rmre:aRPAelAnu.Xn2 aN Vt. rya. Reviews No. Oats Oaseription EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS CAW Pmjelas'&istiy Man 110.2015 22644PM -2015114imsM A402 Agenda Item # 8A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: May 28, 2015 MEETING: June 2, 2015 City Council SUBJ: Aldi — Site Plan Review and Hardcover Variance — 3522 Sioux Drive Review Deadline Complete Application Received: March 13, 2015 Review Deadline: July 11, 2015 Summary of Request Aldi, Inc. proposes to construct a 17,825 square foot grocery store at the southeast corner of Highway 55 and Sioux Drive. The development would require the following land use approvals in order to permit the construction proposed by the applicant: 1) Variance — the applicant requests a variance to exceed the maximum of 25% impervious surface permitted in the Shoreland Overlay district of Elm Creek. 2) Site Plan Review for construction of a new commercial building. Although this staff report will generally describe the site plan review first for the sake of context, staff recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council consider the variance request first, since the site plan review would be contingent upon the variance. The subject site currently contains the 2,670 square foot office building of Hedtke, Inc., a 1,765 square foot storage building, and a small parking lot. Much of the site is currently maintained as lawn. Elm Creek flows through the property from west to east, with many trees located on the steep slopes down to the creek. Highway 55 is located north of Elm Creek, railroad right-of-way is located to the south, and the Hamel Station commercial development is located to the west of Sioux Drive. An existing single-family home is located to the east, but the property is planned for commercial redevelopment. Uptown Hamel is located up Sioux Drive to the south. The subject site is zoned Commercial Highway -Railroad (CH -RR), the same as the property to the west of Sioux Drive. The City rezoned the property from Uptown Hame1-2 to CH -RR in 2013 at the request of the property owner. The property to the east is zoned Uptown Hame1-2. An aerial of the subject site and surrounding area can be found at the top of the following page. The Planning Commission discussed the proposal at their April and May meetings. Concern was raised at the April meeting related to the amount of vegetation proposed to be removed along Elm Creek. Additional concern was raised at the May meeting related to the amount of hardcover being permitted for the sake of parking. Commissioners questioned if this were appropriate for the sake of Elm Creek and also as the entrance to Uptown Hamel. The Commission ultimately recommended denial of the variance and site plan. Aldi Page 1 of 9 June 2, 2015 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Site Plan Review Section 825.55 requires Site Plan Review approval prior to issuance of permits for new commercial developments to determine whether it is consistent with relevant requirements. Proposed Use Retail uses are listed as a permitted use in the CH -RR zoning district. Setbacks/Lot Dimensions Following is a summary of the proposed construction compared to the requirements of the CH -RR zoning district and shoreland overlay district: CH -RR Requirement Proposed Minimum Lot Area 1 acre 3.26 acres Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 380 feet Minimum Lot Depth 120 feet 380 feet Minimum Front Yard Setback 25 feet 165 feet Aldi Site Plan Review Page 2 of 9 June 2, 2015 City Council Meeting CH -RR Requirement Proposed Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback 15 feet 45 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 25 feet 33 feet Street Setback (collector) 35 feet 165 feet Railroad Setback Zero, except as necessary for safety, fire access, or utilities Zero Setback from Residential 50 feet N/A Minimum Parking Setbacks Front Yard Rear/Interior Side Yards Residential 25 feet 10 feet 40 feet 25 feet 10 feet N/A Maximum Impervious Surface 25% (Shoreland Overlay) 45.4% Wetlands/Floodplain/Shoreland Elm Creek flows through the northern portion of the subject property, which has implications for the City's wetland, floodplain and shoreland regulations. A wetland on the adjacent property to the east also extends into the southeastern corner of this site. The applicant has established that they are eligible for a de minimus exemption to fill 195 square feet of this wetland. Elm Creek Watershed requires a vegetative buffer along Elm Creek. Their standards exceed the City's wetland buffer requirements along the Creek. The floodplain along Elm Creek extends to elevation 962, and is located within Elm Creek's buffer, so there are no impacts. The improvements on the site are located around elevation 978. The Shoreland Overlay District requires the following standards for property within 300 feet of streams: • 50 foot structure and parking setback: The structure is setback 105 feet from the stream and parking is proposed to be setback 50 feet. • 25% impervious surface maximum. The applicant has requested a variance to allow up to 50% of the site to contain impervious surfaces. This will be discussed more in-depth later in the report. • Lowest level of the building shall be three feet above the ordinary high water level. The proposed structure is over 10 feet above the high water level. • "Shoreland Alteration - Alteration of vegetation or topography shall be regulated to prevent soil erosion, preserve shoreland aesthetics, preserve historic sites, prevent bank slumping, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. Vegetation alteration necessary for the construction of structures and individual sewage treatment systems or for the construction of roads and parking areas shall be exempt from the vegetation alteration standards of this subdivision. Removal or alteration of vegetation, except for agricultural and forest management uses, is allowed, subject to the following standards: o Intensive vegetation clearing within the shore impact zone shall not be allowed. o In the shore impact zone, limited clearing of trees and shrubs and cutting, pruning, and trimming of trees shall be allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling and to accommodate the placement of permitted accessory structures or facilities, provided that: Aldi Page 3 of 9 June 2, 2015 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting (1) the screening of structures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions, is not substantially reduced; (2) along tributary streams, existing shading of water surfaces is preserved; and (3) the above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs, or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards." The applicant originally proposed to remove almost every tree along Elm Creek to maximize visibility for their proposed building. The Planning Commission found that this removal was clearly "intensive vegetation clearing," and should not be permitted. The applicant subsequently amended their plan. The applicant hired an arborist to assess the trees on the site, and their report is attached. They suggested the removal of all Boxelder because they are not a preferred tree, and also the removal of the Ash trees because Emerald Ash Borer may be present someday. The applicant proposes to remove 26 of the 40 trees along Elm Creek. The applicant's aborist reports that 14 of these trees are poor quality, and 9 of these 14 are boxelders. The City's tree preservation ordinance does exempt "removal ...and the control of pioneering Tree species such as box elder when needed to manage other ecosystems and where the removal will not cause erosion or damage to riparian areas." A report from the City Engineer's staff responded to the applicant's report and plan is attached. While Emerald Ash Borer is a threat at some time in the future, it is hopefully some time off. Leaving some of these trees and some of the healthier Boxelder in place will allow the new vegetation to establish. He does concur that it would be reasonable to exempt the removal of the 9 Boxelder trees in poor health. The fact that the applicant is requesting a variance to permit more hardcover on the site further supports the importance of maintaining the integrity of the streambank. Staff had discussion with staff at Elm Creek Watershed and staff believes the plan is closer to being able to be approved by the Commission. The watershed has requested some trees on the western portion of the stream. Stormwater/LID The applicant proposes two filtration basins to meet the City's and Elm Creek's stormwater requirements. The City Engineer provided comments which the applicant will need to address. Building Materials The proposed structure is largely modular brick and split -face concrete masonry units. Commercial districts require a minimum of 30% of the exterior materials to be brick, stone, stucco, or glass. The code allows a maximum of 20% to be wood, metal, or hardiboard siding and a maximum of 70% "decorative concrete...color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and...patterned to create a high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance." Aldi Page 4 of 9 June 2, 2015 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting The proposed materials are 50% modular brick, 4% glass, 16% metal, 2% doors and 28% concrete. Provided the proposed concrete meets the decorative standards of the ordinance, the materials would be consistent with requirements. The applicant will provide material samples at the Commission meeting. Building Modulation/Fenestration/Multi-sided Architecture Commercial districts require that "buildings shall be modulated a minimum of once per 40 feet of building perimeter to avoid long, monotonous building walls. This modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building materials/design." The building is approximately 147'x140', requiring 4 aspects of modulation on each frontage. The northern and western elevations provide more vertical and material differentiation. The loading dock provides horizontal modulation to the northern, southern, and eastern elevations. The southern and eastern elevations alternate between brick and concrete, but vertical modulation is provided only by mechanical screens on the roof and the rear of the parapet. Commercial districts require that "building elevations which face a public street shall include generous window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when windows are not practical." Commercial districts require that "any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street, an interior access drive for the development, or a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality generally associated with a front fagade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible with the front building elevation." In this case, the northern and eastern elevations face streets. The Planning Commission and Council can discuss whether the modulation, fenestration, and multi -sided architecture is sufficient. Tree Preservation/Landscaping The applicant proposes to remove 32 of the 56 significant trees on the property. As noted above, the City Engineer's office believes it would be reasonable to exempt the poor quality Boxelder leaving 47 significant trees on the property. The tree preservation ordinance would allow removal of 13 of these trees without replacement. The applicant proposes to remove 20 trees (42.5%) requiring 77 inches of replacement. In addition to the tree replacement requirements, the zoning district requires minimum landscaping based upon the lot perimeter, including: 1) 1 overstory tree per 50 feet of perimeter 2) 1 ornamental tree per 100 feet of perimeter 3) 1 shrub per 30 feet of perimeter The subject site is approximately 1710 feet in perimeter, requiring 34 overstory trees, 17 ornamental trees, and 57 shrubs. It appears that the shrub and ornamental requirements would be met, but not the tree planting and replacement requirement. Aldi Page 5 of 9 June 2, 2015 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Commercial district standards require landscaping to occupy a minimum of 8% of the parking lot and loading dock area. Staff calculates that 8.3% of the proposed parking lot and loading dock area is landscaping. Transportation The applicant proposes an access drive onto Sioux Drive, roughly across from existing Westfalen Trail. The access includes a single lane into the site and two lanes exiting the site. The City Engineer has recommended a number of improvements to this access drive. The applicant has submitted a traffic analysis which has been reviewed by the City Engineer. The applicant concludes that no improvements are necessary to Sioux Drive to support the proposed development, but the City Engineer disagrees. The City Engineer recommends a left turn lane on Sioux Drive into the site so that traffic entering the site can do so safely, especially if traffic is backed up at the Highway 55 stop light. Staff recommends that construction of this turn lane be included as a condition of approval. The development to the west of Sioux Drive entered into a petition and waiver for construction of a left -turn lane onto Westfalen Trail. The most efficient means of construction is most likely for Aldi to also enter into a petition and waiver and for the City to construct both turn lanes as a single project. The City Engineer has estimated this cost at $220,000. The subject site is 3.35 acres in size, and the development to the west of Sioux Drive is 2.34 acres in size. Using this basis, staff is recommending that 58.8% of the cost be the responsibility of the subject site. The applicant's site design provides an access drive to the eastern property line. The applicant has stated that they are open to providing an easement to the property owner to the east to provide to Sioux Drive. Staff believes that this easement would provide flexibility to access the eastern site for west bound traffic, since there is a median in Highway 55. It would also provide an opportunity to discuss access upon the ultimate redevelopment of the eastern property, with the possibility of benefitting Highway 55 by removing a direct access to the highway for the future use. It should be noted that extending this access to the eastern property would require some wetland impacts, as there is a wetland immediately to the east of the Aldi site. Off -Street Parking The City would require a minimum of 72 parking spaces (1 per 250 gross square feet of retail space). The applicant originally proposed 80 parking stalls, but following the feedback of the Planning Commission, reduced down to the minimum, reducing 3428 square feet of hardcover and allowing a sidewalk connection to be added. Sewer/Water The applicant proposes to connect to the utilities in existing improvements on Sioux Drive. The applicant proposes to extend a watermain to the property to the east to support that ultimate redevelopment. Loading Dock Commercial districts regulations state that "no loading dock shall encroach into the required setbacks for the front yard or a side yard adjacent to a street. Loading docks shall be located, and landscaping shall be utilized so as to minimize visibility from streets," and that "no loading dock shall be visible, to the fullest extent possible, from any residential zoning district." Staff believes Aldi Page 6 of 9 June 2, 2015 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting the location of the proposed loading dock on the east of the building meets this requirement very well. Utilities/Mechanical Equipment/Trash and Recycling Commercial districts require that utilities be located under ground and that transformers be screened. The applicant proposes to relocate existing electrical lines underground. Staff recommends a condition improving the landscaping adjacent to the proposed transformer. The applicant proposes rooftop mechanical equipment to be screened with metal wall units. An example of these screens is included with the applicant's narrative. Commercial districts require "equipment shall be screened through the use of architectural elements and materials which are compatible with the overall design of the building." Staff calculated the metal walls as part of the overall exterior materials. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to discuss if the proposed screening is compatible with the overall design. Review Criteria Staff recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council review the requests in the following order: 1) Hardcover Variance; 2) Site Plan Review. Variance According to Subd. 2 of Section 825.45 of the City Code, the City is required to consider the following criteria when reviewing a variance request: "Subd. 2. Criteria for Granting Variances. (a) A variance shall only be granted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. (b) A variance shall only be granted when it is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (c) A variance may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a practical difficulty. In order for a practical difficulty to be established, all of the following criteria shall be met: (1) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. In determining if the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, the board shall consider, among other factors, whether the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty and whether the variance confers upon the applicant any special privileges that are denied to the owners of other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district; (2) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and (3) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The applicant argues that the location of a commercial property along Elm Creek and at a major intersection in the City is unique and justifies a variance. The City did approve a variance for 50% hardcover on the site to the west of Sioux Drive, but the previous approval does not create precedent, as each variance is to be reviewed on its own. The proposed commercial use is permitted in the district and even a variance to 45.4% is significantly below the amount of Aldi Page 7 of 9 June 2, 2015 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting hardcover which is permitted on other commercial property. Staff believes the development would be similar to the development to the west of Sioux Drive, thus not altering the essential character of the locality. If the City approves the variance, staff would recommend a condition that additional stormwater treatment or streambank restoration is provided. Staff believes the intensive vegetation removal proposed by the applicant severely undercuts the justification for the variance. With a more reasonable trimming and removal plan and enhanced stormwater and streambank restoration, staff believes it is reasonable to argue that the variance criteria are met. Site Plan Review The purpose of a Site Plan Review, as described in Section 825.55, is to review proposed construction for consistency with City regulations. Obviously, in this case, the proposed construction exceeds hardcover requirements. If the City Council does not grant approval of the variance, the Site Plan Review cannot be approved. If the Council approves the variance, it appears that other relevant regulations would be met. The City "may condition its approval in any manner it deems reasonably necessary in order to promote public health, safety or welfare, to achieve compliance with this ordinance, or to accomplish the purposes of the district in which the property is located." The City has a fair amount of discretion when reviewing requests for variances. In fact, a variance should only be granted if the City finds that the criteria have been met. Generally, the City has a low level of discretion when reviewing on site plan applications. If the request is consistent with City regulations, it should be approved. In this case, the site would exceed maximum hardcover allowances without the variance. Therefore, if the variance is not granted, the Site Plan Review should not be approved. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the requests at their April and May meetings. The Commission was very concerned with the initial plan to clear cut the vegetation along Elm Creek. The Commission also believed that the amount of hardcover was too high and that the applicant was not minimizing the requested variance so that the variance criteria were not met. As a result, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the requests. Draft minutes from the Planning Commission are attached. After the Planning Commission provided their recommendation, the applicant reduced the size of the parking lot by approximately 4000 square feet. The original plan is attached for reference. Potential Council Action Before taking action, the City Council should hold a Public Hearing on the requested variance, sitting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment. The City Council may consider the following actions: • Refer to Planning Commission — the site plan has been amended since Planning Commission review. It is not clear whether this would change the recommendation, but the Council could refer to it in order to find out. Aldi Page 8 of 9 June 2, 2015 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting " Direct staff to prepare documents for denial based upon the findings provided by the Planning Commission. If the City Council concurs that the variance criteria have not been met, this motion would be appropriate. " Direct staff to prepare documents for approval. Staff has provided potential conditions to the Planning Commission in case they found the variance criteria were met. These conditions are provided below for reference in case the Council finds the variance criteria have been met: 1) The applicant shall construct the improvements as displayed on the plans received by the City 5/21/2015, except as modified herein. 2) The applicant shall update tree removal and landscaping plans as follows: a. The applicant shall also meet the recommendations of the City's landscape architect. b. Landscaping shall be provided to screen the proposed transformer location. 3) The applicant shall update plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to provide stormwater management and/or streambank stabilization in excess of minimum City standards in order to mitigate for the hardcover permitted in excess of 25% allowed in the Shoreland Overlay District. 4) The applicant shall construct a left turn lane into the access drive or enter into a petition and waiver to pay for the cost of the City to construct such improvements in connection with other improvements to Sioux Drive. 5) The applicant shall update plans consistent with the comments of the City's transportation engineer to improve truck turning movements and to ensure the lanes of the proposed access drive line up with the lanes of Westfalen Trail. 6) Upland buffers shall be established fully around all wetland areas, including required vegetation, signage and easements. 7) Plans shall be updated so that stormwater improvements are not located in the right-of-way. 8) Proposed concrete masonry units shall be decorative in nature consistent with the standards of Commercial Zoning Districts. 9) The applicant shall meet the recommendations of the City Engineer. 10) The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals, including but not limited to Elm Creek Watershed, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Health, and other relevant agencies. 11) The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the site plan and other relevant documents. Attachments 1) List of documents submitted 2) Excerpts from 4/14/2015 and 5/12/2015 Planning Commission minutes 3) Public Comments Received 4) City Engineer Comments dated 5/4/2015, 5/1/2015, and 5/28/2015 5) Applicant Narratives 6) Applicant letter re: tree removal 7) Plans received by the City 5/21/2015 Aldi Page 9 of 9 June 2, 2015 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Project: LR-15-157 — Aldi Site Plan and Variance The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 3/13/2015 3/13/2015 3 Application Y Fee 3/13/2015 3/10/2015 1 Fee Y $7000 Mailing Labels 3/13/2015 3/2/2015 7 Labels Y Variance Narrative 3/13/2015 3/12/2015 2 Variance Narrative Y Site Plan Narrative 3/13/2015 3/12/2015 2 Site Plan Narrative Y Plans 3/13/2015 3/13/2015 15 Plans Y Updated Landscape Plan 3/25/2015 3/24/2015 1 Landscape Plan 3-25-2015 Y Traffic Report 3/13/2015 3/13/2015 105 Traffic Report Y Site Plan Checklist 3/13/2015 3 Site Plan Checklist Y Variance Checklist 3/13/2015 4 Variance Checklist Y Stormwater Management Plan 3/13/2015 3/12/2015 310 Stormwater Y Stormwater-Updated 5/21 5/21/2015 5/21/2015 366 Stormwater — 5-21-2015 N Plans — Updated 3-31-2015 3/31/2015 3/31/2015 20 Plans — 3-31-2015 N Plans — Updated 4/28/2015 4/28/2015 4/28/2015 24 Plans — 4-28-2015 N landscaping update 5/5/2015 Plans — Updated 5/21/2015 5/21/2015 5/21/2015 20 Plans — 5-21-2015 N Civil only, no arch Geotech information 3/31/2015 3/20/2015 50 Geotech N Engineer Response 3/30/2015 3/30/2015 9 Eng Response — 3-30-2015 N Engineer Response 5/21/2015 5/20/2015 5 Eng Response — 5-21-2015 N Mech Screening /Light Specs 3/30/2015 11 MechScreenLightSpecs N (continued on back) Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Elm Creek Comments 3/18/2015 4 Elm Creek — 3-18-2015 Elm Creek Comments 4/6/2015 5 Elm Creek — 4-6-2015 Elm Creek Comments 5/27/2015 6 Elm Creek — 5-27-2015 Engineering Comments 3/26/2015 8 Engineering — 03-26-2015 Includes stormwater, ESC, traffic Engineer Comments 4/6/2015 8 Engineering — 04-06-2015 Includes storm, ESC, traffic (4/9/2015) Engineer Comments 5/4/2015 3 Engineering— 5-4-2015 Includes stormwater comments Police Comments None Fire Marshal/Building Official Comments 3/23/2015 1 Fire Marshal — 3-23-2015 Legal Comments 3/23/2015 1 Legal — 3-23-2015 Prelim Comments - 120 day letter 3/27/2015 3 Prelim-120day-3-27-2015 Landscape Plan Comments 4/1/2015 2 Landscape — 4-1-2015 Landscape Plan Comments 5/7/2015 2 Landscape — 5-7-2015 Landscape Plan Comments 5/28/2015 2 Landscape — 5-28/2015 Staff Report 4/9/2015 8 Staff Report — 4-14-2015 PC 27 pages with attachments (w/o plans) Staff Report 5/7/2015 5 Staff Report — 5-12-2015 PC 30 pages with attachments (w/o plans) Public Comments Document Date Notes Electronic Excerpt from Planning Commission minutes 4/14/2015 Excerpt from Planning Commission minutes 5/12/2015 35 Emails Received 5/16/2015 — Received from: Kelkar; Harris; Grinvald (Ed & Cyndy); Emails Received 5/20/2015 Cross; Wallman; Cardinal; Roeser; Webster; Bernhardt; Chugani; Zayden; DesLauriers (Bill & Claire); Theis; Cwach; Hendrickson; Riviere; Peichel; Sonenstahl; Fortin (Ron & Marilyn); Schmidt (Lee & Stacy); Lien (Terri & Brad); Nicol; Holmers; Viere (Gordy & Diane); Young; Therrien; Hilgers; Heitke (Ben& Kari); Burns; Puhl and Miller Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from April 14, 2015 Meeting Minutes Aldi — 3522 Sioux Drive — Variance Request to the Impervious Surface Requirements and Site Plan Review to Construct an Aldi Grocery Store Finke presented a request from Aldi Grocery Store. He stated that the first request would be for a variance regarding the impervious surface allowed within the shoreline overlay district. He noted that an adjacent site was allowed to go to a similar amount of hardcover. He stated that the second request would be a Site Plan review but noted that the variance would be necessary to consider the Site Plan. He reviewed the zoning of the property and adjacent properties, explaining what would be allowed on each site. He presented the proposed Site Plan, identifying the proposed parking and access drive. He stated that retail uses are allowed within this zoning district and noted that the request would meet the requirements of the district with the exception of the hardcover requirement. He stated that the regulations of the shoreline district were discussed in the packet, noting that the application meets most of the requirements with the exception of the hardcover limit. He reviewed the tree removal and replacement plan proposed by the applicant and noted that in addition to the required planting, additional landscaping measures would be necessary. He reviewed the recommendations of the City Engineer in regard to traffic and a proposed left turn lane. He summarized the criteria that must be met in order to approve a variance and recommended that the Commission consider the variance prior to the Site Plan, as the Site Plan cannot be approved without receipt of the variance. He stated that staff feels that the proposed tree removal is too high and that additional storm water and stream bank restoration efforts should be made. He stated that staff would recommend approval, subject to the additional conditions proposed by staff. Albers questioned if there was a transportation study in regard to the amount of traffic that would be generated. Finke confirmed that the applicant completed a traffic analysis done by the applicant and reviewed by the City Engineer, which led to his recommendation regarding the left turn lane. White referenced the intersection at the top of the hill, which can be dangerous and questioned why that is not a three way stop. Finke stated that he is unsure but explained that the intent is most likely to keep traffic moving on the hill. He noted that during winter months stopped cars could begin to roll backward. White questioned how improvement could be made at that intersection. Finke stated that opportunities could be investigated but advised that would be separate of this application. Williams questioned the feedback the applicant received from the Elm Creek Watershed. Finke stated that the applicant can address that response as the City has not yet received a response. He stated that there seems to be an openness from the Watershed to completing a more holistic approach to stream bank restoration. He stated that ultimately the applicant would need to meet the conditions of the City and the Watershed. Williams questioned the amount of context the Commission can take into consideration for the variance request. Finke stated that all aspects of the Site Plan review can be considered when reviewing the variance, as the circumstances for the variance should be considered. He explained that the City can condition the variance upon conditions. Williams confirmed that the variance could be conditioned. He questioned if it would be possible to grant a variance upon the condition that the applicant must show that all conditions have been met. Finke confirmed that could be done. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from April 14, 2015 Meeting Minutes Williams questioned if the request could then be tabled requesting additional information be brought back. Finke confirmed that there would be sufficient time within the review period to table the request. He noted that another option would be to make the conditions and forward the ultimate decision to the City Council. Williams stated that it seems the 50 percent hardcover requirement is being triggered by the need to meet parking requirements. He questioned if there would be a way that the applicant could comply with the parking requirements without needing a variance. Finke confirmed that the parking requirement could not be met with a building this size without triggering a variance request. Andy Brandel, ISG, stated that he is present on behalf of the applicant Aldi to request that the Commission approve the variance and Site Plan requests. He stated that they have been working closely with Finke and the Elm Creek Watershed. He stated that this site is difficult because of the shoreline district. He noted that the landscape buffer and requirements have been difficult. He stated that they did attend the Watershed Board meeting the previous week and had a lengthy discussion regarding their new regulations and what could be done to meet the visibility requirements, develop the site, and provide benefits to the Watershed. He stated that the Board did make a motion to consider a variance from their standards to allow additional tree removal upon the condition that the applicant work to develop a plan they could approve which would include creek bank restorations and intensive native plantings along the creek. He stated that the landscape plan included in this application is not what they will be moving forward with. He stated that they will be working with Watershed staff to draft a plan, which could be approved at the May Watershed meeting. He was confident that they could work with the Watershed and City staff in order to develop a landscape plan that could be approved by both parties. Murrin asked for additional information as to the trees proposed from removal along Elm Creek, as to whether that would be for parking or for sign location. Brandel stated that the trees proposed for removal are for visibility of the site as well as for general grading and development purposes. Murrin asked for additional information regarding the proposed access. Brandel provided additional clarification regarding the proposed access and location of the loading dock. Murrin asked for the proposed store hours. Brandel reported that the hours would be 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. He noted that the traffic study did take into account the peak morning hours, even though the store is not open during that timeframe. He advised that truck deliveries are made during non -operating hours. Williams questioned if the size proposed is similar to other Aldi stores. Brandel confirmed that this is an average sized store, noting that this design is a little different in order to meet the requirements. Williams questioned if the applicant would have a problem with the Commission tabling the request to ensure that Watershed approval of the variance is obtained. 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from April 14, 2015 Meeting Minutes Brandel stated that their preference would be to obtain approval from the Commission tonight, noting restrictions with seller and timeline. He stated that they would work with City and Watershed staff in order to present a new landscaping plan to the City Council. Williams questioned the timing of approvals. Brandel stated that they would obtain Watershed approval prior to presenting the request to the City Council. Wayne Elam, Commercial Real Estate Solution, spoke in representation of the property owner. He discussed the unique situation of this lot because of the MnDOT requirements, for which the applicant is not being reimbursed for. Williams opened the public hearing. Jim Tiller, owner of the property to the east, noted that the property actually is composed of two parcels, one lying within Medina and one within Plymouth. He believed that those parcels are zoned commercial and have been for some time. He referenced the existing entrance, which provides access to both parcels as well as the residential properties. He referenced the infiltration basin as proposed and stated that if that were to overflow that would come onto his property. He suggested that be repositioned to drain north to prevent the incident that the basin overflow onto his property. He stated that he is not opposed to this applicant and hopes that it will work. He did have concern over the access agreement. He stated that he would love to see the involvement of the Highway Department in the creation of the access. He stated that he would like to see a right entrance into the property from Highway 55 with an entry/exit point onto Sioux Drive. He stated that people driving on Highway 55 would not be aware of how to access the property if the entrance from Highway 55 is removed. He stated that he would be willing to enter into an agreement with the applicant to ensure that undesirable uses not be placed on either site, such as adult entertainment. He did have concern that people would not know how to access the site without proper access and/or signage. He believed the ability to have a right in access from Highway 55 would be the best solution. Murrin asked for additional information regarding the intent of Tiller's property. Tiller responded that it is hard to say what will be developed in that location but confirmed that he would like to sell the property for redevelopment sooner rather than later. Williams closed the public hearing. Williams questioned if there has ever been discussion regarding closing the driveway access, specifically whether that access would be closed when the property is sold. Finke stated that there has not been that discussion but noted that this recommendation would allow for flexibility. He stated that the access easement is seen as benefitting the property but provided additional information regarding previous discussions with MnDOT. White stated that she would be in favor of the variance request so long as the landscaping plans are altered to the satisfaction of City and Watershed staff. Williams stated that he would also be in agreement with that but noted that he does not like the idea of approving the request now without seeing the landscaping plan. He confirmed that Commission would not meet again before the applicant presents to the Watershed. Finke explained that the applicant would have the amended plan with staff comments from the Watershed by the next Commission meeting but would not have met with the Watershed prior to that meeting. He stated that if approved by the Commission at the May meeting, staff could have that information prepared to go before the 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from April 14, 2015 Meeting Minutes City Council at their second meeting in May. He stated that if the applicant is going back to the Watershed before the City Council, the Commission could review the application again at the next meeting without affecting the timeline. Murrin stated that she would like to see the amended landscape plan approved by the Watershed before a decision is made, meaning the request would come back to the Commission in June. She stated that she has an issue with removing a significant amount of trees simply to increase visibility, and noted that a sign could provide that needed visibility. Albers stated that he would also prefer to wait and see what is said by the Watershed. Williams stated that he also shared the concern regarding tree removal simply for increasing visibility. Finke stated that pushing the decision to June would not leave much time in the review period. He explained that while approval is needed from both entities, the Watershed approval is not needed for City approval. White stated that the applicant could bring back an amended landscaping plan in May, as the Watershed approval is not needed for City approval. Finke agreed that it would be reasonable for the Commission to table the request to the May meeting, noting that the City approval will be important and he would not want to delay that until the June meeting. Williams stated that he thinks this is a good project that he would like to see move forward and confirmed that he would like to see additional input on the engineering comments and the updated landscaping plan. Murrin expressed concern with the traffic that would be added to Sioux Drive. She stated that she would be concerned with only one access point from Sioux Drive. She stated that perhaps additional trees could be left with a sign installed identifying the business. She also expressed concern with the easement to the neighboring property and believed ultimately a sign would need to be place near that location to identify that this access would be for Aldi as well. Finke stated that it is likely that staff could support a right turn lane to the property from Highway 55, if it could be done safely. He noted that MnDOT could be a factor in that as well. He stated that it is not the decision of the City or the adjacent property owner to determine where the applicant chooses to put their sign. Williams agreed that while those are potential concerns, the Commission can only decide what is within their scope of decision. Motion by Foote, seconded by Albers, to table the variance request to the May 12th Planning Commission meeting in order to receive an updated landscaping plan. Motion approved unanimously. (Absent: Nolan and Reid) 4 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT May 12, 2015 Meeting Minutes Aldi — 3522 Sioux Drive — Variance Request to the Impervious Surface Requirements and Site Plan Review to Construct an Aldi Grocery Store Finke stated that the Commission reviewed this item at their April meeting, noting that the request includes a variance and Site Plan review. He stated that there had been concern regarding the proposed tree removal along Elm Creek and advised that the applicant has composed a new tree removal and landscaping plan to preserve additional trees. He stated that the tree removal rate had been reduced and there had been a discussion with the Watershed and staff asking that the poor quality trees be considered exempt as part of the proposed streambank restoration. He stated that as proposed only 15 healthy trees would be removed from the shoreline area, as the poor quality trees would be exempt. He clarified that 12 trees had been considered poor quality in the shoreline area. He clarified that the applicant is asking that the poor quality trees be exempt and in that case replacement would not be required. He acknowledged that the landscaping plan submitted by the applicant is over planted, noting that it appears the applicant will still replace in excess of what would be required if the exemption is gained. He stated that there was also discussion at the last meeting regarding the access to the site as the neighbor to the east had expressed concern with an alternate access. Reid questioned if there would be an issue with the amount of hardcover if the property were not in the shoreline district. Finke confirmed that the site would not exceed the limitations in another district. Nolan referenced the proposed access road and questioned if that would be striped or whether that would be more like a parking lot apron. Finke stated that discussion has not yet occurred. Williams referenced the issue of overplanting and questioned if the overplanting was specific to shrubs. Finke stated that it was both shrubs and trees. Reid questioned if this would be considered a part of Uptown Hamel. Finke stated that the property would be considered Commercial Highway/Railroad and would not be considered Uptown Hamel. Reid stated that it may be more attractive to have the parking in the back of the building rather than in front. Andy Brandel, ISG, spoke in representation of the applicant. He stated that there has been a lot of discussion following the last meeting. He stated that the applicant's certified arborist visited the site and the landscaping plan has been amended in order to better meet the regulations of the City and Elm Creek Watershed District. He stated that he spoke with watershed staff and they believed that the Board could support the application as amended. He stated that the tree removal has been reduced and almost 500 feet of shoreline improvement and storm water features have been added. Reid referenced the parking and noted that the parking proposed exceeds the requirements of the City. She stated that this is an entrance into Uptown Hamel and did not believe that fit the aesthetic. Brandel stated that as proposed there are 80 stalls, which is the minimum number of stalls they desire for their sites. Reid stated that the appearance has a lot of asphalt and suggested placing the building in front and the parking in the back in order to improve the aesthetic and not make it so suburban looking. She also believed that this would improve the visibility of the store. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT May 12, 2015 Meeting Minutes Brandel stated that they did discuss that option with Aldi following the last meeting and noted that multiple layouts were considered during this process. He stated that from a function standpoint they did not believe that would be an appropriate layout. He noted that they have considered and built layouts such as that in the past and will in the future but that layout would not fit with this specific site. Williams referenced the issue of overplanting and questioned why the shrubs are needed in that abundance. Brandel stated that since the last review of the Commission the arborist visited the site and identified hazard trees. He explained that in order to provide the necessary replacement, the plan became too dense. He stated that the newest version of the landscaping plan includes less removal and therefore less of a need for replacement, which has allowed better spacing. Williams confirmed that the overplanting was in attempt to replace the level needed and was not an ornamental desire. Nolan questioned if the plan submitted better balances the desires of the City or whether that plan was still overplanted. Finke stated that staff has not received the newest version of the plan. Nolan noted that there is an option to pay into an environmental fund, should replacement not be an option. Brandel stated that would be something that they would consider but the direction had been to amend the landscaping plan, which is what they attempt to do. He noted that the new plan had been submitted to staff today but there was not sufficient time for a thorough review. Albers questioned if the replacement trees could be planted on another site. Finke confirmed that is an option but noted that previous developments have fulfilled the needs of the City. Nolan questioned if there would be an opportunity breakup the asphalt aesthetic of the site with landscaping islands. Brandel reported that the site is pretty tight as is with the required Metropolitan Council easement and access easement for the property to the east. He explained that there is not much space left to meet the needs of the users and the requirements of the City. Reid questioned how the size of this store compares to other Aldi stores. Brandel stated that this is the new standard for the Aldi stores, noting that sizes have ranged during the past nine years. He confirmed that all new stores would be this size. Reid stated that it appears the size of the building and lot is too large for the parcel. She believed that a smaller store would better fit the parcel. Nolan opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. James Tiller spoke in representation of Arnt Hamel LLC, which is the property to the east. He stated that he also spoke at the review of this item at the last meeting. He stated that Arnt property is not opposed to this development but does oppose the driveway easement as the only access to their site. He stated that if Arnt Property agrees to an inadequate agreement that would limit their future access to Highway 55. He presented the access that they would prefer to see and believed the City should obtain the best possible access they can 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT May 12, 2015 Meeting Minutes from Aldi. He did not believe that an easement would be adequate as the only access into the property. He stated that there are a lot of potential problems for development of the Arnt property, noting that the Highway 55 access has been in existence for the past 50 years. He hoped that the Highway Department would work with Arnt when that time comes. Nolan questioned if there is an existing easement across the Aldi property. Tiller confirmed that there is not currently an easement in place and there is only the access from Highway 55. He believed that the best possible access from the neighboring property would be a City street but had been told that would not be an option. Nolan referenced striping. Tiller stated that issue would not be discussed until the Arnt property is sold in the future but believed that striping would be a part of that discussion. Nolan stated that now is the time to consider alternatives. Tiller stated that he would like to have Aldi provide an easement for a sign and for the City to provide a variance for a sign. Nolan stated that he is speaking specifically in regard to the easement across the Aldi property. Tiller stated that he would like to see an in/out easement for the property. He recognized the constraints on Aldi as well and noted that he does not have engineering experience. He stated that he has been told that this is the best they can do. Nolan closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. Murrin questioned if it would be possible to have an in/out access to Highway 55 from the Aldi property or whether that would only be possible through the Arnt property. Finke confirmed that the Aldi property does not have frontage on Highway 55 because of the creek location and therefore there can only be access to Highway 55 through the Arnt property. He explained that there are two action items before the Commission and noted that the Site Plan is contingent upon receipt of the variance. Nolan asked for clarification in regard to the easement for the property owner to the east. Finke explained that staff has requested that the applicant lay out an easement for the property to the east to provide the best option for that property to be able to develop. He stated that Aldi has stated that they will provide an easement. Murrin questioned if the thought of the property owner to the east is that if an easement is provided that when his property is sold, MnDOT could close the Highway 55 access. Finke stated that is not the City's position and noted that the City could support a right -in to that site if a right turn lane could be provided along Highway 55 but noted that ultimately that decision would be MnDOT's and would come into play when that parcel actually develops. He stated that if there is not alternate access, MnDOT could not close the Highway 55 access for the Arnt property. Murrin stated that perhaps that easement area could remain grass at this time. 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT May 12, 2015 Meeting Minutes Finke stated that would not be logical as the access will be used for truck deliveries and will not actually increase the greenspace by that much. Williams questioned if the easement could be made more like a City street, suggesting even labeling. Finke stated that an option could be to label the driveway as a private street but confirmed that the drive lane would be narrower than a typical street. Nolan questioned if quality of trees has ever resulted in an exemption. Finke replied that the tree preservation ordinance specifically allows for exemption and stated that the City has done that in other instances but noted that those were waivers rather than exemptions. Nolan stated that clearly there is a preference to increase their visibility to eastbound traffic and therefore the planting is proposed for the northeast portion of the site. He questioned if that would mean planting trees that would be removed in the future to increase the visibility of the adjacent site. Finke noted that there would be a buffer. Nolan referenced the variance request and asked for input. Murrin confirmed that a smaller store would result in less impervious surface. She agreed with Reid that this will be the gateway going into Hamel and also believed that a larger store would result in more traffic concerns. She referenced eight or nine parking stalls that could be removed as well. Nolan stated that in a standard commercial district there is 70 to 75 percent hardcover allowed. He questioned the percentage of lot the building would occupy. Finke stated that the site is constrained because of the buffer and easement areas and street location. Nolan stated that he would prefer to see some landscaping islands to break up the asphalt a bit. Williams stated that the applicant did state that 80 parking spots would be the minimum number of stalls that they would want. Nolan stated that they would not want to create a parking problem either, noting that it is rare that someone requests additional parking and he would not want to create a shortage. Reid stated that she likes Aldi but believes the building would be more attractive on the other side. Motion by Williams, seconded by Reid, to recommend denial of the Aldi impervious surface variance request as the application has found to be excessive and does not meet the criteria. Motion carries 6-1 (Nolan opposed). Motion by Williams, seconded by Foote, to recommend denial of the Aldi Site Plan based upon the same findings of fact. Motion carries unanimously. 4 Jodi Gallup From: Sent: To: Subject: Praful Kelkar <praful.kelkar@yahoo.com> Saturday, May 16, 2015 7:33 PM Jodi Gallup Do not support Aldi We are against building Aldi at 55 and Sioux drive. Thank you Praful Kelkar 4557 Medina Lake Drive Medina, MN 55340 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Jodi Gallup From: Sent: To: Subject: rharris@hedtkeinc.com Saturday, May 16, 2015 7:47 PM Jodi Gallup Aldi's in Hamel It has come to my attention a proposal to build an Aldi's grocery store has been presented to the Medina City Council. It would be terrific to have an Aldi's In this location! I live in Rockford and commute on highway 55 every day. Other than the small Target, there is nowhere between Plymouth and Buffalo to grocery shop. Please work together with the Aldi's representatives to pass this project. Everyone I talk to is excited about it. Thank you for listening to your constituents - and to those of us who work in but live outside your area who would love to spend our dollars In Medina/Hamel. Roseanne Harris NW 'y;nowAld •N auel Aal SO£Z ssa0 apnel !Addey Woad la;o! a salew pue anuanaa ul Supq pinonn ;! I laao;s poo} alponel ano—!ply o; a 0; Aenn ano;o;no;!q a aunb aApp o; aney;nq cola 'laSiel) aw!; ayl Ile eaae lap o; oS pue 5s aeau y;noLuAld }o aSpa;saM ay; uo am! am lsn of Iply' SuPq 3Sy3ld aims !ply :pafgns dnlleD !Po(' :ol Wd ££:5 SLOZ'LL AeW 'Aepuns :was <lau lseowoopo sson'µ> ssa0 apnea :woad dnllp9 !Pof su!payAI 55 XmH Z£o `sp!enupp ApuAp pue pg tousaapisuoo ano i ao3 queuy •apcs ISOM all; uo aaau aio;s Aaaooa8 S;usnb poo8 s paau A!Ieaa am •Auadoad avail u uno au; uo aims Aaaao48 s,!p;y us ao3;soddns paSpad IIn3 ano Aanuoa o; pa;uem;snr `ollaH lesodad aao;s Aiaoag s,lply dnlleD Ipof Wd 170.0i SLOZ'LL AeW 'Aepuns <woa llew6@o oun•uosllwe> 03xxew A va(gns :ol :;uas :woad dnllp9 !Paf Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallup From: Rusty <rtwallman@yahoo.com> From: Card918 <card918@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 10:20 AM Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 9:42 AM To: Jodi Gallup To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Aldi's Grocery Subject: Aldi City council members, I would really enjoy an Aldi store in Medina,. This would be very convenient for my family and also an affordable option. Please build. I am writing in support of the Aldi's grocery location. We need more business in Hamel/Medina and this is a positive move in that direction. Rusty Wallman 500 Navajo rd w Sent from my iPad Thank you, Dean Cardinal PO Box 254 Loretto MN 55357 Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallup From: Natasha Cardinal <ncardinal@datalink.com> From: Darcy Roeser <darcyroeser@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 9:36 AM Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 9:31 AM To: Jodi Gallup To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Aldi Subject: aldi support an Aldi coming to Medina. I would love it! We live in Loretto and we currently drive to Minnetonka or Maple I want an aldi in medinal Thank you Grove and we would greatly enjoy an Aldi closer to us. Darcy Roeser Natasha Cardinal 275 Saint John Street Loretto, MN 55357 Natasha Cardinal Maintenance Renewal Associate Datalink Corporation 10050 Crosstown Circle Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Direct: 952-279-4664 Fax 952-658-2351 ncard inalAdatalink.com www.datallnk.com making IT happen " euipainj'aApo laaao wl3 TSVE'lpJeywag eloSuy- Ja;sgaM uue>{ 'not( weyl ieulpaw of !ply ue ppe Luop aseald 'Woad luew col pue slam}s t(snq 's6ulpiinq aNei ' ssw6oad o; waeyo sd! Ile 6ulsoi uaaq sey eulpalN (Z c;a 'qno 'spun) 'AAoqulel 1.96Jel - ttcpeau sago)s kiaow6 aidpnw we aaayl ( } ldaauoa slyl anoadde lou op aseald " wogs luaaaBJayloue paau wu op Apeuostad i pue Allunwwoo ayl;o lsaJ ayl!am u! w!I!M 1! a:l!l pa; l,uop i " eulpayy ul spiv pasodad ayl lsuieSe we ! ley; mow! noA lad of paluem 'sly} asoddo Apuoa}s l 'eulpa!nf 0; awoo 0; s;uem Ipiy pueimapun i s,IpIy oN wafgns uoRealidde 6u!pimq :pafgns dnlleo !pof :oi dnile9 !Pot' :oi Wd 90:9 SIN'9I Aew 'AepanleS :luas lid OT OT STOZ'LT Aeli 'AepunS :was <wool!ew6@o wieywaq" eia6ue> ;pJeywag ela6uy :woa j <woa ooyeA@n S9Eialsgams>I> aalsgam uue>1 :woad dn!le9 !Poi' dnpe9 !pof' Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallup From: Jagdish Chugani <jchugani@gmail.com> From: Allen Zayden <zaidenknop@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 8:46 AM Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 6:20 PM To: Jodi Gallup To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Do not support Aldi Subject: Aldi Medina Store We are against building Aldi at 55 and Sioux drive. Thank you. Jagdish Chugani 4567 Medina Lake Drive Medina, MN 55340. The Jagarian family is in favor of an Aldi store in Medina along Hwy 55 and Sioux Drive. T anueluasardaa sJarnpe;nuew sales salels uaa43u0N sJapneTsa0 ar!elD AleJaouis .Coe;s eu!pa!N ow! anour s,!pIV aney o; 53A 310A 'umol mo ui wnq us;xoddns Xun3 I to asap aro;s Azaoo12 e anoi prom pue agoueurop uo ann I ke)o.J6 sjp1V :ha{gns uoddns !RV :ha(gns dnileg !por :ol dnpeg !por :col WV SS:8 STOZ 'EST Ae!N 'Aepuo!N :tun Wd 65Z STOZ 'ST Aew 'AepuoN :was <wowsw upesniawey> vauneT sea anep :w0J3 <woranp©;piwipsAbe;s> ;piuluDshels :waj dn!!e9 !poi' dn!!e9 !poi' Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallup From: Bill DesLauriers <dslinc@hotmail.com> From: craig.their@doughertymarkets.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 8:58 AM Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 9:21 AM To: Jodi Gallup To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Aldi grocery store Subject: ALDI Support I am all in favor of Aldi's grocery moving into medina - VOTE YES I do not support the ALDI store in Medina. I would support a LUNDS or Byerly's or other boutique grocer with better quality products. 900 Fox Path Court, Medina, MN. Thank you Thanks, Bill DesLauriers DesLauriers and Sons 612-799-9005 Craig D. Theis Vice President Dougherty & Company LLC 90 South Seventh Street, Suite 4300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Office Phone: 612.376.4135 Cell Phone:612.810.7362 Email: craia.theis@douehertvmarkets.com If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender. The information contained herein is confidential and intended only for the recipient or recipients named above and for the purposes indicated. Further distribution of this message without the prior written consent of the author Is prohibited. Any opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Dougherty & Company LLC. Dougherty & Company LLC will not accept transaction orders or time -sensitive action -oriented messages or check requests via e-mail or other electronic delivery. Dougherty & Company LLC and its affiliates reserve the right to monitor all e-mail. For additional disclosure information see http://www.doughertvmarkets.com/disclosure.htm Member SIPC/FINRA Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallup From: Pam <pamcwach@live.com> From: Duane Hendrickson <duanealbin@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 7:21 PM Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 6:51 PM To; Jodi Gallup To: Jodi Gallup Subject: We support Aid Subject: Aldi Hello, Please note we are in support of Aldi building a new store at Hwy 55 & Sioux drive. Thank you, Pam Cwach Sent from my iPad I live at 185 Hamel Road in Medina. I support putting an Aldi in at Hwy 55 and Sioux Road. Thank you, Duane Hendrickson 612.860.1922 OVS9-699-ZT9 Pined MN /�o1s /Cana lnpapuom a alepaudde mom Allunwwoo ay1 Nupp i •eulpaiN ut !ply ue;o uolleuawsuoo unoA noA )lueyl •awoy o1 Jasop awoD ways aas 013A01 mom pue (ueaow00 ut awoy Aw wou;) tply;e dogs o1 glued slnol '3S 01 aA!up Alluauuna I •eulpalnt u! !Pty►o;uoddns Aw moys of will Pd !ply 6uwpoddns :;aafgns drips !pot :ol Wy 6T:S STU' AeW 'Aepsanl :was <lau•esnpo layaladl> 13H0I3d A11139WIN :w0.13 Allwe; auatnty •wM aHl 'pedt Aw wou was Z1!;o none; ut aq mom l pue'py laweH SST le anti I !Ply &WS !Pof Wd SZ:t SIM'6T AeW 'Aepsanl <woD l!ew6pv gsededauau> aialn!a pled :3aafgns :ol :was :wo�3 dntleD !poi' dnllp° !Pof Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallup From: Kathy Sonenstahl <tweetda@comcast.net> From: Ron Fortin <ronfortin14@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 7:48 AM Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:18 AM To: Jodi Gallup To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Aldi store Subject: Aldi's I received a flyer about supporting an Aldi store at Hwy 55 & Sioux Dr. I am in support of this company coming to our area. Kathy Sonenstahl Sent from my iPad We are in favor of Aldi's,it will help the Uptown area grow in A positive way. Ron& Marilyn Forton Sent from myiPhone 1 Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallup From: leestang2 <leestang2@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:35 AM To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Aldi grocery store To all that it concerns on the city council. I writing to you to voice our opinion on having a aldi grocery store. Having a grocery store on this side of hwy 55 would be a huge asset to our community. This would allow our family to walk or ride bike to the grocery store. Aldi usually has a great selection of fresh fruit and organic foods that our family would benefit from. Currently the closest store is either maple grove or Minnetonka. With the new lennar development, there is a wealth of new young families. This store will be a Beat addition for all. Having a Aldi grocery store on this side of hwy 55 would make another opportunity available for families to spend time together doing things with out having to use the car or electronics and to get outside and exercise. Which is priceless and irreplaceable family time. Having a aldi in our community brings Fresh food, adds value to our community, adds employment opportunity and leaning opportunities for out children. I know our family will be very disappointed if the city doesn't approve the application to allow aldi to open a store in our community. To make it perfectly clear. Our house hold is completely in favor of a aldi grocery store being built at hwy 55 & Sioux Dr. Thank you, Lee and Stacy Schmidt 302 Comanche trl. From: Terri Lien <terri@timberbay.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:33 AM To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Aldi Store We are residents of Argent Parc Condominiums in Uptown Hamel and are in favor of having the Aldi store in our community. Thanks, Terri & Brad Lien Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallup From: Steve Nicol <snicol@go2printmediagroup.com> From: Diane Holmers <msdih@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:38 AM Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:44 AM To: Jodi Gallup To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Aldi's Subject: Aldi vote yes holders To whom it may concern, As a long time supporter of Medina business and the Medina community. I would like you to be aware that I fully support Aldi's grocery store building at 55 and Sioux Dr. Please work with our Medina community to help make Medina a place of interest and a place we all can be proud of. Thank you! Steve Nicol G• print media group Steve Nicol 62 Hamel Road Medina, Minnesota 55340 O 763-479-3070 X 113 C 612-865-7273 www.GO2PrintMediaGroup.com snicolAGO2PrintMediaGrouo.com Sent from my iPhone J Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallup From: DIANE VIERE <dv4242@me.com> From: Nancy Young <cabin2738@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:51 AM Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:27 AM To: Jodi Gallup To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Aldi Subject: Aldi Grocery Store Gordy and I are in full support of putting the grocery store,Aldi in Medina. Thank you - Gordy and Diane Viere 185 Hamel Road #203 Medina, MN 55340 My husband Bruce and I are in favor of having you approve the building of this store. We live in Hamel at Argent Parc condos. Thank you Nancy Young Sent from myiPhone Jodi Gallup Jodi Gallu From: Thomas Therrien <tom@go2printmediagroup.com> From: Claire Des Lauriers <hamelusa@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 12:03 PM Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 12:39 PM To: Jodi Gallup To: Jodi Gallup Subject: Aldi Subject: Aldi store I am in favor of the Aldi store below my building. Please feel free to contact me if you need to discuss anything further. Our entire family is for the Aldi store going in. Gives more opportunity for our young ones to find work that they can walk to and I love shopping Aldi's The parking will be more than adequet Thanks— because not everyone shops at the same time every day. Thomas Therrien i pint medlssroup O 763-479-3070 X 112 C 612-386-5663 www.Go2 Pri ntMediaGroup. com Sincerely Claire DesLauriers Northern States Sales Manufacturers Representative 612-801-3994 auoydl Aw woz; luas a>11PH pey pue uag lsag IIPIV 3A01 aM •uolleaol xnoISJSS ayl of Sulwoo 1PIV Voddns Alin; i pue puegsny AA 06e6-1ZZ-e9L woopewugsJeollyQ & OIN APnf `sanoC Xituwaop •atm! scq; ;o uo!lezap!suoo pup! zno f zo3 noA Nuelly •le!agauaq on saologo aaoul saulpomos •kuununuoo mo zoj lgauaq pappe ue mom azols Azaooz$ zaiylouy •anpa xno!s uo !aureli olu! Su!o8 azols Amoozg !ply3o zone3 u! We I `saaqulajAl llounoo mac !PIV :pafpns anu0 xngs uo Aleo0z6 1pw :pafgns dnlle9 IPof Ku dnlleD Tor :ol W d LO:b STOZ '6T Ae lAl 'Aepsenl :was Ad 9£Z STOZ '6T Aelnl 'Aepsanl :;uas woo llew6po am;!eL IO :woJA <woo Hew6po sza6llyff, sva6m Rpm. :wozi dnpe9 !poi. dn!!e9 !poi" Jodi Gallup Dusty Finke From: Adam Burns <me@adamburns.org> From: Marylea Puhl <mpuhl@westfinancialcu.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 4:14 PM Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:58 PM To: Jodi Gallup To: Dusty Finke Subject: Aldi's Grocery Support Subject: ALDI AT HWY 55 AND SIOUX DROVE To whom it may concern, I tried to use the email provided on the pink form, however it doesn't work. Please know that I am favor of Aldi as a new grocery store in Medina. As a resident of the Medina area, as well as a student and entrepreneur, I, Adam Arthur Chandler, fully support an Aldi's grocery store at the Highway 55 & Sioux Drive location. In such a rural area, a grocery store is arguably one of the most important types of business. Already with a fire department, post office, city hall, and a church, the next item to expand Medina as a town would be a grocery store - a means for the residents of town to obtain food, if even by wallcing. Do let me know of any updates on this project. Many regards, Adam Arthur Chandler BURNS Thank you Marylea Pohl West Financial Credit Union "The right direction in banking." Member Services Coordinator 763-235-6008 763-235-6001 fax NMLS #728028 WFCU NMLS #441316 mpuhl@westfinancialcu.com Data breach call to action from CUNA Mutual Send a message to Congress. We need to seize lawmakers' attention so they turn to holding merchants accountable for their data breaches. StopTheDataBreaches is where everyone — can visit, learn more and participate in this significant grassroots effort. Credit unions around the state and around the country are mobilizing to protect the credit union tax status. It is critical that credit union supporters send a strong message to Congress stressing the importance of the credit union corporate income tax exemption. Changes to the credit union tax status would result in higher taxes for 1.5 million consumers in Minnesota who are credit union members, as well as 96 million consumers across the country. Please support "Don't Tax My Credit Union" and encourage your friends, family and coworkers to do the same! Take Action Now! Tell your member of Congress, "Don't tax my credit union!" aapiw uu4-1 %006 poddns I vulpaw oa 6wwoo eq pinoo s,lply 01 palioxa AAA Witt wafqns dnpegipof :ol Wd 60:b STOZ'OZ Aew'AepsaupaM :►uas <woD ooyeA 696UapiwuuAl> Jaww uoAl :woad dnllp9 por WSB c9C Assac� engineering • planning • environmental • construction May 4, 2015 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: City Project: LR-15-157 ALDI Site Plan Review WSB Project No. 2712-370 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the site plans dated April 28, 2015, for the proposed ALDI store located at 3522 Sioux Drive. The plans propose to construct utility and site improvements to serve a 17,825 square foot retail store. We have the following preliminary comments with regards to engineering matters. 1. The plans should specify cutting an 8" tee into the existing watermain rather than a wet tap. An 8" gate valve should be added just east of the tee. 2. The plans have addressed our previous comments dated April 6, 2015. 3. When final plans are submitted the applicant should provide a cost estimate (Excel format) for the site improvements, a landscaping cost estimate and an estimated cost for the irrigation system so that we can calculate the financial guarantee required. 4. Stormwater comments are attached. Please contact me at 612-209-5113 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. %mot Tom Kellogg Attachment St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com WSB c�C Associales, Inc. engineering • planning • environmental • construction Memorandum To: Tom Kellogg, P.E., City Engineer City of Medina From: Earth Evans, P.E. Water Resources Project Manager WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: 5.1.15 Re: Aldi Stormwater Management Plan Review City Project No. LR-I5-157 WSB Project No. 2712-37 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have completed a preliminary review of the stormwater management plan for the Aldi development in Medina, MN. The site was previously reviewed on 4.6.15. The site is located east of Sioux Drive adjacent to Elm Creek. Documents provided for review include the following: • Stormwater Report dated 4.28.15 • Response to City comments • Grading and Utility Plans dated 4.28.15 These plans were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's Stormwater Design Manual and general engineering practices for stormwater management. 1. A permit will be required from the DNR for work below the OHW of Elm Creek. 2. The east pipe P-16 directs concentrated flow to the adjacent property to the east. The EOF for filtration basin #2 is also routed through the adjacent property to the east. Routing concentrated flow and/or changing drainage conditions to adjacent property is not acceptable without receiving approval from the adjacent property owner or appropriate easements. 3. Pretreatment basin #1 volume should not be quantified as filtration volume towards meeting the City's filtration requirement. St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K902712-370 Admin\DoesAldi Stormwater Comments 050I15.doc Aldi 5.1.15 Page 2 4. The 42" perforated pipe pretreatment system upstream of basin #2 should not be quantified as filtration volume towards meeting the City's filtration requirement as it is being utilized as pretreatment. 5. We recommend providing a 2' sump below the invert of the proposed 42" CMP pipe. 6. There are concerns with maintenance of the 42" CMP pretreatment pipe. The roof runoff tributary to the pipe is fairly clean. However, the parking lot runoff and runoff from the adjacent property to the south are also tributary to the system. No pretreatment is provided upstream, which will tend to lead to clogging of the perforations in the pipe and rock bedding material. Vacuuming or jetting the system will likely lead to issues with the rock bed washing out. We recommend providing a different type of pretreatment upstream of filtration basin #2 due to these maintenance issues. 7. Grading on the property to the south will require a temporary easement. Future submittals should indicate how grading will be completed to allow for a proposed Swale to the east (as noted on plan sheet C3.11) without impacting the adjacent property. 8. Runoff to Sioux Drive from the property should be incorporated into the model and must be less than or equal to existing conditions. We recommend 2 catch basins at the end radii of the entry road to take the site runoff into filtration basin #1. 9. The offsite parking lot and building to the south discharge to the site by sheet draining over the proposed loading dock access road before being collected in structure A-3. There are concerns with this design due to the potential for significant flow over the access road. We recommend adding storm structure(s) in the green space to the south of the access road to collect the offsite runoff. K902712-370 Admin\DoesAldi Stormwater Comments 050I15.doc WSB & A,rca'�` engineering • planning • environmental • construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-5414800 Fax: 763-541-1700 Memorandum To: Tom Kellogg, P.E., City Engineer City of Medina From: Jeff Feulner, R.L.A. Landscape Architect WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: 5.28.15 Re: Aldi Landscape Plan Review City Project No. LR-15-157 WSB Project No. 02712-37 We have completed a review of the Landscape Plan for the Aldi development in Medina, MN, dated 5-21-15. The site is located east of Sioux Drive adjacent to Elm Creek. Documents provided for review include the following: • Landscape Plan (L1.11) dated 5.21.15 • Landscape Notes & Plant List (L1.12) dated 5.21.15 • Tree Removal Plan (L2.11) dated 5.21.15 • Elm Creek Bank Improvement Plan (L3.11) dated 5.21.15 These plans were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's Tree Preservation and Replacement Ordinance. 1. Replacement trees should be placed in similar locations of the trees being removed along the Elm Creek corridor, to replicate the natural environment that is being removed. 9 of the healthy trees planned for removal (21 %) are located within the western half of the site. A comparable percentage of proposed overstory trees should be placed within this same zone in the western portion of the site. 2. Creek bank restoration should include a variety of species and sizes — including overstory trees. Proposed creek bank improvements only include large shrubs and native seeding. St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com KA02712-370\Admin\Does \Aldi Landscape Review 052815.doc elm creek Watershed Management Commission ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 3235 Fernbrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 PH: 763.553.1144 E-mail: judie@jass.biz TECHNICAL OFFICE Hennepin County Public Works Department of Environment and Energy 701 Fourth Ave. South, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55415 PH: 612.348.7338 E-mail: james.kujawa(&co.hennepin.mn.us ALDI Medina, Project #2015-009 Project Overview: This is a 3.3 acre property located off of Sioux Drive just south of the intersection with Highway 55 and County Road 101. There is an existing office building and shed on this site. Elm Creek runs along the northerly 1/3 of the property. The development of this site will result in the construction of a 17,825 square foot ALDI grocery retail center, 80- stall parking lot, and other related site work. This project will be evaluated under the Commission's Third Generation Watershed Plan Standards. Our review will be for stormwater management, grading and erosion controls and buffers. Applicant: ALDI Inc., Andrew Mack, 4201 Bagley Avenue North, Faribault, MN 55021. Phone: 507-333-9460. Email: Andrew.mack@aldi.us Agent/Engineer: IS Group, Attn. Andy Brandel, 1415 Town Square Lane, Faribault, MN 55021. Phone: 507-331-1500. Email: andy.brandel@is-grp.com Exhibits: 1) ALDI, Inc. ECWMC Request for Plan Review and Approval and project review fee of $1,150, received March 13, 2015. 2) ALDI, Inc. Retail Facility Stormwater Management Manual, by ISG dated May 21, 2015 3) ALDI, Inc. Retail Facility Site Plan, dated May 21, 2015 a. C 1.11 Existing Site and Removal Plan b. C2.11 Site Plan c. C2.12 Site Utility Plan d. C3.11 Site Grading Plan e. C3.12 Building Perimeter Spot Elevation Plan and Details f. C4.11 Existing Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan g. C4.12 Proposed Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan h. C4.13 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Notes i. C5.11 to C5.16 Site Details and Typical Basin Details j. C6.11 Site Lighting Plan 4) City of Medina Application for Planning Consideration dated March 13, 2015. 5) ISG plan review responses to Medina dated March 30, April 28, and May 20,2015. 6) Aldi Medina Landscape Plans a. Sheet L.11 Landscape Plan dated May 12, 2015 b. Sheet L1.12 Landscape Notes & Plan List, dated May 12, 2015 c. Sheet L2.11 Tree Removal Plan, dated May 21, 2015 CHAMPLIN • CORCORAN • DAYTON • MAPLE GROVE • MEDINA • PLYMOUTH • ROGERS ALDI, Medina 2015-009 May 22, 2015 Page 2 of 6 d. Sheet L3.11 Elm Creek Bank Improvement Plan, dated May 21, 2015. 7) ISG Buffer variance request dated May 11, 2015 8) HCEED email correspondence to Medina City Planner dated May 7, 2015 regarding staff comments on submitted landscape and Streambank improvement plan. Findings; 1) A complete application was received March 13, 2015. The initial 60-day review and decision period per MN Statute 15.99 expires May 13, 2015. Staff extended the deadline to June 15, 2015 based on the time needed to review updates and revision submittals received on May 7 and to provide the applicant time to update the buffer plans. 2) Fee of $1,150 is based on our review of commercial/industrial development/redevelopment for grading and erosion control, stormwater management and development within a floodplain (impacts 0 to 100 cy) 3) No floodplain impacts are proposed Stormwater 4) 1.56 acres of new impervious areas will be created on site. There was approximately 0.4 acres of impervious area on this site prior to development. 5) Infiltration tests on existing site soils in the vicinity of the ponds, produced rates at less than 0.2 inch per hour. With such low rates, infiltration ponds are not practicable. Other methods to achieve credits for abstraction should be explored. Credits for irrigation, soil amendments, excess buffer and preservation areas are available per the Commissions standards (appendix O, Rule D, 3 ix) 6) Two stormwater filter basins are proposed to be construction for stormwater management. Both ponds will filter water through 3 feet of a sand/compost mix before it goes into a drain tile system and is discharged through an outlet control structure. Water in both basins can get to 18" deep before it starts to flow out of the structure. a. The east basin water will be pre-treated by an underground 42" pipe storage/filter system and two SAFL-Baffle weirs. The west basin by a forebay pond. 7) Rate controls meet the Commission's standards. 2, 10 and 100 year peak flow events are less after development. They are as follows: 2-yr Peak Flow (cfs) 10-yr Peak Flow (cfs) 100-yr Peak Flow (cfs) Site Outflow Exiting Proposed Exiting Proposed Exiting Proposed 7.5 2.9 14.9 10.0 32.4 26.0 8) An operation and maintenance plan agreement (made in favor of the City of Medina) must be approved by the Commission and the City of Medina. This plan must be recorded with the title of this property. 9) A five year vegetation maintenance plans is necessary for the biofiltration basin plantings. ALDI, Medina 2015-009 May 22, 2015 Page 3 of 6 10) A drainage and utility easement must be provided over the pre-treatment facilities, ponds and outlet areas. 11) A permit from the DNR will be required to outlet the storm sewer below the OHWL of Elm Creek. 12) Water quality and volume loads are estimates as follows: Condition (based on 3.3 acres) TP Load (NURP) (lbs./yr) TP Load (MIDS) TSS Load (MIDS) (lbs./yr) Volume (MIDS) (Cubic Ft.) (lbs./yr) Pre -development (baseline) 1.7 1.9 338 0 Post -development without BMPs 8.0 3.3 573 6,764 Post -development with BMPs 2.2 1.7 153 5,726 Net Change ("baseline" compared to "post -development with BMPs") +0.5 -0.2 -185 +5 726 ' 13) In lieu of this site meeting the 1.1' volume abstraction requirements, staff analyzed the biofiltration basins for meeting the Commission's old channel protection volume requirements. The filter basin drain tile will handle all events up to 2.5 inches of rainfall over a 24 hour period from all hard surface areas. The retention time would be greater than 4 hours. This would comply with our channel protection volume requirements from our 2nd generation plan Wetland and Stream Buffer 14) Elm Creek is protected with an average 50 foot buffer (25 foot minimum) measured from the top of the bank. 15) A major impact to the vegetation within the buffer area is proposed. Per the Elm Creek Watershed buffer standards, the retention of natural vegetation in an undisturbed state is required unless it contains undesirable plans species such as buckthorn, red canary grass or species on the MN State Noxious Weeds list. Impacts to the vegetation, not meeting these criteria is not allowed. 16) A variance to the Commissions buffer rules has been requested from the applicant. 17) Buffer monumentation is required at each parcel line where it crosses a buffer strip and has a maximum spacing of 200 feet. 18) Staff recommends the following buffer area modification; a. Three additional overstory trees can be planted in westerly portion of the buffer. b. The tree planting plan is too dense in the western section of the buffer. Grading and Erosion Control 19) If During site work we recommend the permanent ponds are used as temporary sediment control ponds. Final grading, soil removal and engineered soil infill for these ponds would be completed when the site is paved and the risk of sediment from construction ALDI, Medina 2015-009 May 22, 2015 Page 4 of 6 activities is minimal (generally after the site is paved and tacking of dirt will not occur). Temporary outlet pipes would be necessary. 20) During the Streambank site work silt fence should be placed at the bank of the construction limits. If this is impractical, silt control in the stream will be required downstream of the work. 21) Natural stone used for the rip rap along Elm Creek must be defined as field rock or granite. 22) Streambank work must conform to DNR requirements for riprap work allowed without a DNR protected waters permit.. Recommendation: • The Commission's consideration of the buffer and vegetation removal plans along Elm Creek. • Approval of the stormwater management plans pending; o Receipt of recorded O&M agreement documents o A five year vegetation management plan for the biofiltration basins and native planting areas is developed and approved by staff o Erosion and sediment controls meet the Commission's requirements. . o Streambank work conforms to DNR requirements for riprap work allowed without a DNR protected waters permit. James C. Kujawa Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy Advisor to the Commission May 22, 2015 ALDI, Medina 2015-009 May 22, 2015 Page 5 of 6 Location Map !A. III , rme05,=s046,11,115 24 - Project Location 33 .1 '985,911413Y .3ave .CS ZS _3'J1C 3, 3/it ;p b.d • e:1 • 3Cltl-I. C�NISF9 '1.0wAriwirkuaNO3 r -- 37,2113 3M.45 TILLS M3 Zf3i31,4l�3d oNrcrins ' [1A1noev SNOILVA.3-13 0d5 ti•od 1.33HS 03S sales = 3d3 br1 11113 1dDWVS SZS'Gr ;1A OS 0111011110 (140171/3 omor nom11{ 0S 6C9-111 W 30 D 031i10011 '11,11N 3 ONO' 1331 3d11o1Dad 0'9WD1SOR 23363 dr'w 7 —" . f7 VON71V2I b'![ II..�, L•: l 11101111111311Nf1 3�,Itl: Mro::o 9'd117 BO 3i l;Nli7f _r.dirfa CU Cae r,}IarHYa : 3.:JA X11CI5 1C IM117..1 N1 NI -7 -41,IN •.7.97 "-'14"In• '.I'fN 0€'9L6=NOLLVA313 '1A111 .97 S o N. 'E-esam CS See • FlMN c3L •eC_ iH31Glnlad cl 1WaeMn5 ,:0' /eE • 3EF51 =139oo ,ID PM • hnC-1 ,.3..8•eC_ .•10.LS-I..4 IJ13:6 Y JI1S•L1-II LOfl`AMM MIFW ¢ IK,N32 �Ih March 12, 2015 Dusty Finke City Planner Planning Department City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 RE: ALDI, Inc. Project Description and Zoning Variance Application Narrative Medina, Minnesota Dusty: ISG Please consider the following project description narrative during the review process for the attached Zoning Variance Application. All supplemental information required for the zoning variance review process has also been attached to provide a comprehensive review. The zoning variance application and supplemental information are being submitted as part of a request to allow redevelopment of an existing commercial site to accommodate a new 17,825 square foot ALDI Grocery Store as well as associated parking lot, drive aisles, stormwater facilities, and utilities. The proposed facility will also include a 714 square foot canopy at the front of the building (east side) as well as a loading dock to accept delivery of goods at the rear (west side) of the building. The proposed project is located at 3522 Sioux Drive in Medina, Minnesota. The site is described as Section 12 T118N R23W (PID 1211823410069) and is comprised of approximately 3.264 acres. The site is bordered by Elm Creek to the northeast and a branch of the Canadian Pacific Railroad to the south. The site is served by an existing access and utilities from Sioux Drive, which borders the west side of the site. The property is currently zoned as CH -RR: Commercial Highway -Railroad District with Shoreland Overlay. Grocery stores are provided as a permitted use within this district. While no zoning modifications will be required to facilitate the proposed project, a variance is being requested based on the proposed increase of impervious surface necessary to facilitate redevelopment of this site. Based on the Shoreland Overlay restrictions, impervious surfacing is limited to 25% of the total site area. A variance is required to increase the allowable impervious to 50% in order to accommodate the proposed site redevelopment and make productive and appealing use of a currently underutilized commercial lot. The variance requested is the minimum application required to alleviate the adverse development condition. Site area calculations performed as part of the site design process confirmed an increase of approximately 1.22 acres of impervious surface to accommodate the proposed site redevelopment. The existing impervious area totals 0.41 acres which equates to 12.6% of the existing site. The proposed increase will result in a total of 1.56 impervious acres or 47.8% of the existing site. This increase is necessary in order to accommodate the proposed loading dock, which is vital for delivery of goods and produce to the grocery store, and to facilitate adequate parking in accordance with City of Medina ordinances. The proposed open area is still well within the requirements at 1.70 acres or 52.2% of the total site. To mitigate any potential impacts created by adding impervious surfacing, two new infiltration basins are also proposed to manage stormwater runoff created by the development of the ALDI site. These infiltration basins will be constructed on the northwest and southeast sides of the site as illustrated by the attached supplemental information. Stormwater from the west portion of the site will be directed to the corresponding northwest basin and stormwater from the east portion will drain toward the southeast basin. Stormwater will be treated by the respective infiltration basins and eventually overflow into the adjacent ditchway and into Elm Creek. 1415 Town Square Lane + Faribault, MN 55021 info@is-grp.com + www.is-grp.com P: 507.331.1500 I+S GROUP I+S GROUP ALDI is also proposing to construct two retaining walls on the property to mitigate impacts of a proposed increase in imperious surfacing to the site. One retaining wall is proposed on the north side of the site, running parallel with Elm Creek. A second retaining wall would be constructed on the northeast side of the site to control and appropriately direct drainage in the vicinity of the new loading dock. Other adjacent properties have been granted variances to mitigate similar conditions and allow performance of ordinary operations afforded to other similarly situated tenants of like businesses. This request would allow application of the same ordinary opportunities to the subject parcel. Further, the site conditions present are not related to any actions of the applicant. Rather they are existing adverse geographic and topographic elements to the property that would be considered limiting to nearly any potential tenant. Particularly limiting factors include the proximity of Elm Creek and the associated buffer setback from Elm Creek as well as the Met Council Sanitary Sewer Easement which runs along the north and east sides of the property. The variance will not be materially or otherwise detrimental to the purposes of the Medina Zoning Ordinance or to other properties within the same zone. The proposed project will not create any negative impacts to the health, safety, or welfare of neighboring properties or the general public. Due to the traffic already generated by neighboring commercial properties, traffic volume within the area is not anticipated to increase dramatically due to the development of the ALDI site. In addition, the redeveloped lot will provide adequate parking per City of Medina requirements; therefore, no negative impacts are anticipated. No pollution, negative impacts to the environment, or effects on existing waterways or the capacity of flood plains are anticipated as a result of this project. It should be noted that in addition to this Zoning Variance Application, a request has also been submitted to the Elm Creek Watershed District for approval of the proposed site redevelopment and associated new site plan. No special privileges will be result from approval of the variance. Instead, granting the requested variance will only afford this property the same rights and opportunities enjoyed by other similarly situated neighboring properties. Approval of this project will provide a complementary use and an added amenity to the area within an existing development district. It is consistent with pertinent orderly development guidelines, and all applicable local ordinances and regulations affecting redevelopment of this property have been considered and adhered to during the design process. This project is an appropriate land use within the district and meets adequate setbacks and parking requirements for the proposed use. These considerations along with the supplemental information provided within this submittal support approval the attached Zoning Variance Application. Please contact me at 507.331.1500 if there is any additional information we can provide in support of this request on behalf of ALDI, Inc. Respectfully Submitted, Andrew T. Brandel, PE Associate Principal, Engineer Civil Engineering Group ATB/saw ALDI, Inc. Project Description and Zoning Variance Application Narrative Medina, Minnesota March 12, 2015 Page 2 of 2 March 12, 2015 Dusty Finke City Planner Planning Department City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 RE: ALDI, Inc. Project Description and Site Application Narrative Medina, Minnesota Dusty: ISG Please consider the following project description narrative during the review process for the attached Site Plan Application. All supplemental information required for the site plan review process has also been attached to provide a comprehensive review. The site plan review application and supplemental information are being submitted as part of a request to allow redevelopment of an existing commercial site to accommodate a new 17,825 square foot ALDI Grocery Store as well as associated parking lot, drive aisles, stormwater facilities, and utilities. The proposed facility will also include a 714 square foot canopy at the front of the building (east side) as well as a loading dock to accept delivery of goods at the rear (west side) of the building. The proposed project is located at 3522 Sioux Drive in Medina, Minnesota. The site is described as Section 12 T118N R23W (PID 1211823410069) and is comprised of approximately 3.264 acres. The property is currently zoned as CH -RR: Commercial Highway -Railroad District with Shoreland Overlay. Grocery stores are provided as a permitted use within this district, and no zoning modifications will be required to facilitate the proposed project. The site is bordered by Elm Creek to the northeast and a branch of the Canadian Pacific Railroad to the south. The site is served by an existing access and utilities from Sioux Drive, which borders the west side of the site. The following figures describe the anticipated public utility usage generated by the redeveloped site, including estimated water and sanitary sewer usage: PROPOSED SITE USAGES TYPE SF 0/0 OF SITE RETAIL 18,539 13.0% PARKING/ACCESS 49,419 34.8% STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 8,240 5.8% LANDSCAPING/OPEN SPACE 66,002 46.4% TOTAL SITE 142,200 100.0% PROPOSED SITE UTILITY USAGES TYPE MONTHLY YEARLY DOMESTIC WATER 4,500 GALLONS 54,000 GALLONS SANITARY 4,500 GALLONS 54,000 GALLONS Site work for this project will include (but not be limited to) grading, paving, landscaping, lighting, and extension of existing curb and gutter, water, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer as well as other general site work as needed to complete construction. Demolition and removal of two underutilized and outdated, existing buildings will also be required. In addition, the proposed project will construct a retaining wall on the north side of the site, running parallel with Elm Creek, as well as the northeast side of the site to control and appropriately direct drainage in the vicinity of the new loading dock. 1415 Town Square Lane + Faribault, MN 55021 info@is-grp.com + www.is-grp.com P: 507.331.1500 I+S GROUP I+S GROUP Two new infiltration basins are also proposed to manage stormwater runoff created by the development of the ALDI site. These infiltration basins will be constructed on the northwest and southeast sides of the site as illustrated by the attached supplemental information. Stormwater from the west portion of the site will be directed to the corresponding northwest basin and stormwater from the east portion will drain toward the southeast basin. Stormwater will be treated by the respective infiltration basins and eventually overflow into the adjacent ditchway and into Elm Creek. In addition to this Site Plan Review Application, a request has also been submitted to the Elm Creek Watershed District for approval of the proposed site redevelopment and associated new site plan. Approval of this project will provide a complementary use and an added amenity to the area within an existing development district. It is consistent with pertinent orderly development guidelines, and all applicable local ordinances and regulations affecting development of this property have been considered and adhered to during the design process. This project is an appropriate land use within the district and meets adequate setbacks and parking requirements for the proposed use. These considerations along with the supplemental information provided within this submittal support approval the attached Site Plan Application. Please contact me at 507.331.1500 if there is any additional information we can provide in support of this request on behalf of ALDI, Inc. Respectfully Submitted, T-67-&-"( Andrew T. Brandel, PE Associate Principal, Engineer Civil Engineering Group ATB/saw ALDI, Inc. Project Description and Site Plan Application Narrative Medina, Minnesota March 12, 2015 Page 2 of 2 May 4, 2015 Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission 3235 Fernbrook Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Re: Tree Inventory and Condition Assessment at Future Aldi Location, City of Medina Commissioners: ISG On behalf of Aldi Inc., a tree inventory and assessment of tree conditions was conducted on the proposed Aldi site in Medina, MN to provide recommendations for removal and preservation. The site was visited on February 2nd and April 23rd, 2015 to inventory and visually inspect and assess all trees on the parcel for health and condition. Methods The Medina City Code defines a "Significant Tree" as a healthy, deciduous Tree, measuring eight (8) inches in diameter or greater, or a healthy coniferous Tree, measuring four (4) inches or greater in Diameter. Each significant tree species was identified, size documented, condition assessed, and location GPS'd. Visual conditions of cracking, bark peeling, excess woodpecker damage, dead large branches, root girdling/exposure, rot, fungus, included bark, and considerable irregular symmetry was documented. Two or more of these conditions classified the individual tree as poor condition. Findings The riparian area of Elm Creek located on the northern edge of the property consisted primarily of green ash and boxelder trees. The shrub understory consists of buckthorn, honeysuckle and gooseberry species. A total of 68 significant trees were documented on the parcel. See enclosed Table 1. Tree Inventory and Assessment for more details. Recommendation 39 trees are recommended for removal, 22 are recommended to be pruned and 7 are in good condition. This recommendation is based on removing those trees that are in poor condition and/or pose a potential hazard. Due to the presence of emerald ash borer in Hennepin County, all ash trees on site could be removed in anticipation for the spread and expected destruction of ash trees. Boxelder trees are known for being short lived, with poor form and having brittle branches. The species are also susceptible to a wide range of diseases and insect pests making it an undesirable species for urban settings. Many of the boxelder on site have co -dominant stems and included bark, which make them structurally weak and susceptible for failure. Many are also growing from the toe of the stream bank and have exposed roots due to bank erosion. These trees were recommended for removal due to expected failure and to allow for establishment of species that will aid in the stability of the creek bank. Please feel free to contact me at 507.387.6651 or bridgett.winkels(ais-grp.com if you need further clarification or additional information. Regards, Bridgett M. Winkels, Environmental Scientist RTIFII:D ;ARB(MST rTji 1SA ISA Certified Arborist® MN-4595A I IS East Hickory Street, Suite 300 + Mankato, MN 56001 info@is-grp.com + www,is-grp.com P: 507.387.6651 1+s GROUP Table 1. Tree Inventory and Assessment. Tree Tag Number Species DBFi (inches) Condition Recommendation Assessment Notes 1 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 12 Healthy Remove Good in general - needs pruning if kept 2 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 13 Healthy Remove Slight lean toward creek and road - Good in general - needs pruning if kept 3 Boxelder Acer negundo 9 Healthy Prune Remove dead branches and prune out poor branches 4 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9 Poor Remove Poor quality 5 Boxelder Acer negundo 9 Healthy Remove Growing from bank, many dead branches 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 12 Poor Remove Poor quality 7 Boxelder Acer negundo 16 Healthy Remove Growing from bank, co -dominant stem 8 Boxelder Acer negundo 12 Poor Remove Poor quality, bank eroding exposed roots, river grape in area 9 Boxelder Acer negundo 9 Healthy Prune Good quality, prune out many damaged branches 10 Boxelder Acer negundo 8 Dead Remove Dead 11 Boxelder Acer negundo 14 Healthy Remove Growing from bank, strong lean, co -dominant stems - potential for issues 12 Boxelder Acer negundo 8 Poor Remove Poor quality, Growing from bank 13 Boxelder Acer negundo 9 Healthy Prune Heavy pruning needed to remove dead branches 14 Boxelder Acer negundo 9 Healthy Prune Heavy pruning needed to remove dead branches 15 Boxelder Acer negundo 11 Poor Remove Large canker from previous damage, dead tree fallen onto, river grape taking over 16 Boxelder Acer negundo 12 Healthy Prune 17 Boxelder Acer negundo 17 Healthy Prune Strong lean toward south hill 18 Boxelder Acer negundo 10 Healthy Remove Needs heavy pruning if kept 19 Boxelder Acer negundo 27 Healthy Remove Co -dominant stems with possible included bark - potential for failure 20 Boxelder Acer negundo 10 Healthy Remove Strong lean toward creel< (North). Heavily prune needed if Kept 21 Boxelder Acer negundo 10 Healthy Prune Leaning toward south hill. Needs lots of pruning 22 Boxelder Acer negundo 15 Healthy Remove Co -dominant stems with possible included bark - potential for failure 23 Boxelder Acer negundo 12 Healthy Remove Co -dominant stems with possible included bark - potential for failure 24 Boxelder Acer negundo 11 Poor Remove Rot and heavy woodpecker activity 25 Boxelder Acer negundo 12 Healthy Prune Co -dominant stems with possible included bark - potential for failure 26 Boxelder Acer negundo 8 Healthy Prune Remove dead branches and prune out poor branches 27 American Elm Ulmus americana 9 Dead Remove Dead 28 American Elm Ulmus americana 12 Dead Remove Dead 29 Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana 9 Healthy Good Inspect further after dead trees are removed 30 Boxelder Acer negundo 9 Healthy Prune Co -dominant stems with possible included bark - potential for failure 31 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 4 Healthy Good Prune as needed 32 Boxelder Acer negundo 10 Poor Remove Poor quality 33 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9 Poor Remove Poor quality 34 Boxelder Acer negundo 10 Healthy Prune 35 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9 Healthy Remove Good form but could be removed due to EAB threat 36 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 9 Healthy Good Possibly some pruning 37 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8 Poor Remove Ash - poor condition 38 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 9 Healthy Good Possibly some pruning 39 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 16 Healthy Good Co -dominant stems - potential for failure in future 40 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Healthy Remove Ash, growing out of bank 41 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 18 Healthy Good Prune if needed 42 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 12 Healthy Prune Prune, near ROW 43 Boxelder Acer negundo 12 Healthy Prune Second trunk could fail 44 Boxelder Acer negundo 14 Poor Remove Cracks in trunk and other dead branches 45 American Elm Ulmus americana 25 Healthy Remove Co -dominant stem, included bark - potential failure 46 Boxelder Acer negundo 13 Poor Remove Major branch dead 47 American Elm Ulmus americana 9 Poor Remove Poor condition 48 American Elm Ulmus americana 9 Healthy Prune Investigate further after leaf out to determine condition 49 American Elm Ulmus americana 16 Healthy Prune Prune out dead branched 50 Boxelder Acer negundo 21 Healthy Remove Included bark, heavy woodpecker activity 51 American Elm Ulmus americana 21 Healthy Remove Potential for future failure, co -dominant stems, prune if kept Table 1. Tree Inventory and Assessment. Tree Tag Number Species DBFi (inches) Condition Recommendation Assessment Notes 52 Boxelder Acer negundo 10 Poor Remove Multiple stems with some rot 53 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 18 Healthy Remove Near bank, lots of river grape covering tree 54 Boxelder Acer negundo 10 Poor Remove Dead or poor health 55 Colorado Blue Spruce Picea pungens 10 Healthy Good Near sign in grassed area 56 Boxelder Acer negundo 19 Healthy Remove Prune if kept 57 Boxelder Acer negundo 10 Healthy Prune Co -dominant stems 58 Boxelder Acer negundo 13 Healthy Prune 59 American Elm Ulmus americana 4 Dead Remove Dead 60 Boxelder Acer negundo 10 Healthy Prune 61 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 17 Healthy Prune ROW 1 American Elm Ulmus americana Not Taken Healthy Remove Elm leaning toward road removal ROW 2 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Not Taken Healthy Remove Ash removal ROW 3 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides Not Taken Healthy Prune Cottonwood trim possible included bark ROW 4 Boxelder Acer negundo Not Taken Poor Remove Boxelder w/rot removal ROW 5 Boxelder Acer negundo Not Taken Healthy Prune Boxelder prune ROW 6 Boxelder Acer negundo Not Taken Healthy Remove 8 smaller boxelder in bank ROW 7 Boxelder Acer negundo Not Taken Healthy Prune Boxelder heavy trim needed DATE: 4/29/2015 a ,r - -;' - - . Tree Tag Number �= w b '10.. 1 Species Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica DBH inches 12 Condition Healthy Recommendation Remove - 2 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 13 Healthy Remove ` 3 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Healthy Prune 3 Y 4 -,it Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9 Poor Remove - A1/4,,, 5 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Healthy Remove 6 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 12 Poor Remove ' MT 9 7 Boxelder Acernegundo 16 Healthy Remove a 8 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Poor Remove 54 52 ,MOS — 9 Boxelder Acernegundo 9 Healthy Prune 10 Boxelder Acernegundo 8 Dead Remove 9 51 ® _ _ 11 413 12 Boxelder Boxelder Acernegundo Acernegundo 14 8 Healthy Poor Remove Remove Q 50 _ .� ` 13 a ` 53', 1� PM@ 14 Q 4.7 � � 15 O 7 5 � 4 = 16 17 owI _ V G 7a . 18 O 0 IN 9g � 43g) � � 19 IN 20 _ A AC ROW(3,� 21 _- 03 22 Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo 9 9 11 12 17 10 27 10 10 15 Healthy Healthy Poor Healthy Healthy Healthy Healthy Healthy Healthy Healthy Prune Prune Remove Prune Prune Remove Remove Remove Prune Remove 0 0@ 0, 00 23 OgiD _ Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Healthy Remove 55 90 24 03 Boxelder Acernegundo 11 Poor Remove 9a y 24.. _- it 25 * i 26 ffi A@ 27 Boxelder Boxelder American Elm Acernegundo Acernegundo Ulmusamericana 12 8 9 Healthy Healthy Dead Prune Prune Remove ;f! 01` A y C ` g) 28 4E 29 Oat A@ gf3 @A o 30 American Elm Red Cedar Boxelder Ulmusamericana Juni•erus vir iniana Acernegundo 12 9 9 Dead Health Healthy Remove Good Prune • ffi 31 ' $ So � 32 33 G 4:0 34 411111- ri -- 35 36 Eastern Cottonwood Boxelder Green Ash Boxelder Green Ash Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Populus deltoides 4 10 9 10 9 9 Healthy Poor Poor Healthy Healthy Healthy Good Remove Remove Prune Remove Good 37 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8 Poor Remove . ` 38 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 9 Healthy Good 39 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 16 Healthy Good Y 40 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Healthy Remove i 4 " h 41 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 18 Healthy Good ' i 1 _ E . - 42 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 12 Healthy Prune 'V 43 Boxelder Acernegundo 12 Healthy Prune - , 44 Boxelder Acernegundo 14 Poor Remove -. 45 American Elm Ulmusamericana 25 Healthy Remove 46 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Poor Remove _ `.., - _ 47 American Elm Ulmusamericana 9 Poor Remove 48 American Elm Ulmusamericana 9 Healthy Prune z-F01' 49 American Elm Ulmus americana 16 Healthy Prune l 50 Boxelder Acernegundo 21 Healthy Remove .- t 51 American Elm Ulmusamericana 21 Healthy Remove 60 4. - 52 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Poor Remove t 53 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 18 Healthy Remove `58F 54 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Poor Remove G °1 55 Colorado Blue Spruce Picea pungens 10 Healthy Good ` ° ` 59`=` _ 0A r 56 Boxelder Acernegundo 19 Healthy Remove .x 57 57 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Healthy Prune _ o -. �' t •Ycf)- _ .. _.. _. 58 Boxelder Acernegundo 13 Healthy Prune - �s i� f. , f 59 American Elm Ulmusamericana 4 Dead Remove f�•=; 1, 60 Boxelder Acernegundo 10 Healthy Prune 56 y - 61 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides 17 Healthy Prune • � - � uF . � ROW 1 American Elm Ulmusamericana ---- Healthy Remove a� 9f ROW 2 Green Ash Fraxinus •ennsylvanica ® Healthy Remove jr r -#�i:- ` _ I� ROW 3 Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides Healthy Prune . I ROW Boxelder Acernegundo Poor Remove I, t • r ROW ROW ROW Boxelder Boxelder Boxelder Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo ® ® ® Healthy Healthy Health Prune Remove Prune n�nirewee PN: 14-16408 Legend: Tree Assessment MI Investigation Boundary Scale: Tree Assessment Map SSG Engineering Environmenral `•�n'ng+S om GROUP Source: 2013 Orthophotograph • Good Prune • Remove 0 60 Feet N Future ALDI 1 inch = 60 feet Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota MEDINA, MINNESOTA ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY PLANS FOR: ISG PROJECT # 14-16408 ISG Architecture Engineering EnriranmentA Planning I-FS GROIJP www.o-gom rp.c LEGEND EXISTING w -- UT -- --0E-- --UE-- - - UTV - - F80 - - 990 -989- V 0 PROPOSED -<< <<- I OE UE UTV CITY LIMITS SECTION LINE QUARTER SECTION LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE PROPERTY / LOTLINE EASEMENT LINE ACCESS CONTROL WATER EDGE WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND / MARSH FENCE LINE CULVERT STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TV GAS UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CONTOUR (MAJOR) CONTOUR (MINOR) DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE TREE LINE MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT VALVE CURB STOP POWER POLE UTILITY PEDESTAL / CABINET LOT LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT CULVERT STORM SEWER STORM SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) WATER OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TV GAS CONTOUR MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT VALVE ZONING VARIANCE / SITE PLAN REVIEW 'i ♦ivr,:. a : 1iAf ` D r ",�y',t''y.R .. ExklievEN Rpa.p Y. - LOCATION MAP x" � t i rer'Z st* " --..1.4.6tl uktiril1gad- 1 "=500' r . r mot, v4 SHEET INDEX T1.11 TITLE SHEET C1.11 EXISTING SITE & REMOVAL PLAN C2.11 SITE PLAN C2.12 SITE UTILITY PLAN C3.11 SITE GRADING PLAN C3.12 BUILDING PERIMETER SPOT ELEVATION PLAN AND DETAILS C4.11 EXISTING STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.12 PROPOSED STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4.13 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTES C5.11 SITE DETAILS C5.12 SITE DETAILS C5.13 TYPICAL BASIN DETAILS C5.14 SITE DETAILS C5.15 SITE DETAILS C5.16 SITE DETAILS C6.11 SITE LIGHTING PLAN L1.11 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.12 LANDSCAPE NOTES & PLANT LIST L2.11 TREE REMOVAL PLAN L3.11 ELM CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. WHICH INCLUDES, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER- CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL (WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS), DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES, AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT AND COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK. 3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 5. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OF DETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR IN CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 6. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 7. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TO AVOID GALVANIC CORROSION. 8- THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF ISG. NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION (1-800-252-1166). 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel l 4- 7-$PAI--e DATE 5/21/15 LIC NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILENAME 16408 TITLE DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH PROJECT INDEX: REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - OWNER: Aldi, Inc. OWNER CONTACT: Andrew Mack 4201 Bagley Avenue North Faribault, Minnesota 55021 PH: 507-333-9460x123 Fax: 507-333-9475 ARCHITECT: APD Engineering & Architecture, PLLS. ARCHITECT CONTACT: Brian Grinnell 615 Fishers Run Victor, New York 14564 Ph:585-724-2222 Fax:585-924-4914 PROJECT ADDRESS: 3522 Sioux Drive Hamel, MN 55340 S: 12, T: 118, R: 23 Hamel, Hennepin, Minnesota MANAGING OFFICE: Faribault, Minnesota OFFICE 1415 Town Square Lane Faribault, Minnesota 55021 Ph: 507.331-1500 Fax:507-331.1501 ISG war PROJECT MANAGER: Andy Brandel I `E S GROUP Email: Andy.Brandel@is-grp.com SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCE ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA'S STANDARDS 8 REQUIREMENTS, MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2014 EDITION, AND THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND WATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2013, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. PROJECT DATUM B.M. ELEVATION=976.30 T.N.F.H. LOCATED 280' NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF SIOUX DRIVE & CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD BEHIND THE EAST CURB OF SIOUX DRIVE HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83(1996)) ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 19881NAVD 88). RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATES FOR THIS PROJECT. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY THIS PROJECTS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS OF DATA COLLECTED BY ISG, Inc. BETWEEN NOVEMBER 2014 8 FEBRUARY 2015. TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET T1.11 ��AN''MH E  ��8 9s0- - _ - ��_ i - 0 \ ��`I D�� \ ------ \ - - _- _ -  _b OUIHIQ.P_BANK-6F E1M- -`7- - srm;mry e �� J���� _ \ __ = 9s Y _ -- �� - - - -EREEK AS--SURVEYED-BY-1�P- f - r" c�� Ooc.-Po965477371a_ _ s- W ��_��__  970 1 y.-- ----- <-- r-F-o ,  \J /'`. --- Z \ i\�� t' v ,�� 7 I�� \\ GLCB \ GL-971.83 \ 9 6.31S \ =96 .08N \ \ \ \ 1 \\ - �� --_ ���� ��\1\ \ �� EXIST IG TREE LREMAIN, TYP.- - ��1 \\ \ \�� - --SEE L2.11 - TREE REMOVAL PLAN) - - - - - \ \ BENYC1t MAtN< \ �� \\ 976.3 \ /\ \ \ \ r \ \ \PROTECT INK \\ SIGN, TYP.\ \\ (` \\ \\PROTECT INP. \ \ CONCRETE \\ k \ \ Y \ \\\ /g���� INP. 15" SANITARY INP. 8" CIP WATER (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) REMOVE INP. CASTING 1 (PROTECT STRUCTURE) SAWCUT & REMOVE INP. CURB & GUTTER SAWCUT & REMOVE INP. BITUMINOUS AS NECESSARY FOR PROPOSED_ _ CONSTRUCTION (HATCH)' WE TF LEN -i " ,' T aZ SAWCUT & REMOVE INP SAN MH CONCRETE WALK (HbTCH) R=99290 1=976.025 1=975.56N 0 REMOVE INP. SANITARY & WATER SERVICES (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) CUT & REMOVE INP. GAS SERVICE (COORDINATE W/UTILITY COMPANY) 20 ��- ��  M  M���� _ \ _   - -ECM CREEK _��M ----/��-_ E -'` v v v M-- ���� 1\\\ I \ r = 976 < ---- _ _ 97  _ _  �� " 975 974 ,7 / CLEAR & GRUB INP. TREE / 4 ` (SEE L2g171 =_REE_REMOVAL-PLAN) I 1\ ��_ \ \ \ \ Y`---,- �� �� `` / \ \ \ y \� \ , ''', . ������ FLAG POLE / r REMOVE INP. \ "��f ` REMOVE INP. CONCRETE RETAINING WALL, TYP. % '1 982- _RE_ WALK (HATCH) / i i ���� ���� \ `�� \ \ 9eo' a - REMOVE INP. BUILDING- r 1 ��o �� 9e`' / ��I i / A REMOVE &SALVAGE INP. _ _ \ ������ \ 1 _ \ _�� 1 ��i ��', GAS & ELECTRIC METERS %V \ __-�� TO UTILITY COMPANY \ ��0  ii \ [IA '`\ 1 / \ .- ��`�� r } ���� 9a - - I REMOVE INP. A \\k` / A v ( UNITS, TYP. 0f 2 ,ea 0 .`'` $ X. � 1 A A` j�� / REMOVE INP. n \���� A� A ��' I UNDERGROUND '1 '1 1 _��. \ ��`� � / UTILITY LINE �� �� _ 1- - _ 1 �� �� �������� '�� -984 ` j 1 REMOVE INP. T - 1- ���� �� \ X o i UTILITY E �� REMOVE INPLACE OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE, :.�� \ / 1 i TYP. (COORDINATE W/UTILITY COMPANY)/ n/900. `\��`  `1  \ i  / VI \ _ ---__,< ����--- _ - ����h Z ��' OHL �� E��  OHL  ����  OHL -- \ OHL i��c0����" OHL 416,\ 7 \ ��jC PROTECT INP. -965 - - - - y UTILITY POLE, TYP. / ������ 9$6 v \ \ 98 I ���� ��98.5 \ 4 A\ PROTECT INP. �� �� / / / TREE LINE iYP.�� \\ CONCRETE / \ -" ��987_ EXISTING BUILDING / V    _ / Railro0d i / Soo __Line / PROTECT INP. CURB & J I 9\  \ \ \ GUTTER, TYP. \- r i  Utility Easement  - REMOVE INPLACE SIGN _ perDoc. No. 955004 CLEAR & GRUB TREES AS. \ ��A��iv ro��H R��972.54468 92 ��L��CKELT \LOCKS `��i�� 0 e�� / " 0 -, 111111.H H111111 I.11111.I.1111H1H1.1 II1Vi 40 60 B.M. ELEVATION=976.30 T.N.F.H. LOCATED 280' NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF SIOUX DRIVE & CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD BEHIND THE EAST CURB OF SIOUX DRIVE PROTECT INP. HYDRANT & VALVE, TYP. NEEDED_ FOR PROPOSED \\ \ 978 - - CONSTRUCTIOI4HATCH)\ \\ \ ��\ / - - - - - - - REMOVE��VAGE,I\& R NSZAL�� 1 \ \ ��,,,��,,.��,. �� / �� \ �� RIPRAP AS NEG� SSARY��OR �fiOFOSE0.. RIGHT-OF-WAY, TYP. REMOVE INP. MAIL BOX REMOVE INP. CA1VADIAN PACIFIC 1111111.-1 REMOVE INP. BITUMINOUS SURFACING (HATCH) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOIL CONTAMINATION AREA (HATCH) RAILROAD 7MOVE INP. BUILDING I /' �� i �� --- I I I // \ I I141, I o 3 [\   0 \��` , muNGHWANG \/ _-_-��j \ ess AA -REMOVE &_,REED-EATE-4NP,-UTILITY POLE 985 ISG I +S G RO1J15- 4201 Bagley Ave. N Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Andrew T. Brandel I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 C1-EXISTING DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - EXISTING SITE & REMOVAL PLAN  '3/ GLCB \ \ GL- 971.83 \ 1=9 631S+ \ \ 1=96 .08N ..\\ \ \ \ \ \--I - \ . ..   -- 6.a % \\ \ \\ \ CONSTRUCT ALDI PYLON T1 SIGN (SEE DETAIL) \ BEN* \ MARK \ \ 976.3 \ \ \ r \ CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #1 (HATCH) TOP = 977.50' 100YR = 976.01' OUTLET = 975.50' , BASE = 974.00' \ 'V \\\\\, \\\\ CONSTRUCT PRETREATMENT \ BASIN #1 (HATCH) \ TOP = 977.50' N W L = 975.50' BASE = 973.00' \a CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WALK SECTION (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) F&I: PED RAMP NCATED DOMES (SEE DETAIL) L���� '  ��S7'pAEN/ 0 SAN MH R=982.90 1=976.02S 1=975.56N ALDI MAILBOX W/ POST (SEE DETAIL) VERIFY LOCATION WITH CITY OF MEDINA AND UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 20 40 60 I I x IAN MH 0 Scale: B.M. ELEVATION=976.30 T.N.F.H. LOCATED 280' NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF SIOUX DRIVE & CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD BEHIND THE EAST] CURB OF SIOUX DRIVE \  M 1 1 \ 1 1 r-SAN MH R=990.92 `i M----��M I/ ELM CREEK ACCESS ��W F&I: CATEGORY III EMERGENCY OVERFLOW MAT. ELEVATION=977.00 --W F&I: PARKING WHITE r CONSTRUCT 8" CONCRETE 0 LOT STRIPING, TYP. / RETAINING WALL (SEE DETAIL) .._.._. - CONSTRUCT B618 CURB & FM: HANDICAP POST GUTTER, TYP. (SEE DETAIL) W/BOLLARD & 2 SIGNS y�� (SEE DETAIL) CONSTRUCT 13618 REVERSE PITCH CURB & GUTTER, TYP. (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) I CONSTRUCT STANDARD Z. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION f& (SHADE) (SEE DETAIL) ��\ _ = 6 20' /a ��._ Me EXISTING BUILDING CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD 15 I W < W _ _-M--- ---1A-7- M _ M _ Mil M ` ELM CREEK  w ----- _ W 'WI  \'N\ _ W--_ ��W =��= W ���� \ \\ I \1 \ 0 AN MH 1 R=972.54 \ 3 \ LOCKED \ / I / \  <-----< F&I.' HANDICAP ' STRIPING, TYP. OF 3 F&I. HANDICAP SIGN (MOUNT TQ PROPOSED LIGHT POLE) C F&I: CATEGORY III EMERGENCY OVERFLOW MAT. ELEVATION=974.00 VERSION 6.0 PROTOTYPE X LEFT HAND ENTRY, MODIFIED DOCK X,118,539 SO FT (INCLUDING CANOPY) BUILDING SO FT: 17,825 CANOPY SO FT: 714 FFE = 981.25 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE LOADING DOCK SECTION (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) CONSTRUCT TURN DOWN STYLE CONCRETE WALK, TYP. PROPOSED LOADING DOCK (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL (SEE STRUCTURAL) END OF LOADING DOCK RETAINING WALL & START OF 12" CONCRETE RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) F&I: PED RAMP W/TRUNCATED DOMES, TYP. OF 2 (SEE DETAIL) FRONT SIDE REAR ELM CREEK Q�� SAN MH R=968.92 LOCKED 1 \\ \ \\7 M 7 W��   ��W _0 O0 ' F&I: SALVAGE RIPRAP (HATCH) R\ v \ \ \ SAN MH R=970.19 LOCKED PROPOSED ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT, TYP. PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT (HATCH) SITE SETBACK DATA PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT CH -RR: COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY -RAILROAD DISTRICT WITH SHORELAND OVERLAY SETBACKS BUILDING: PARKING: 25' 25' 15' 10' 25' 10' 50' 50' CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #2 (HATCH) TOP = 974.50' OUTLET= 971.50' BASE = 970.00' \ CONSTRUCT 12" CONCRETE RETAINING WALL (SEE DETAIL) \ \ \ r \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r\ \ \\ \\\ \\ SAN MH R=977.05 1=945.34 PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT & TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (HATCH) SITE AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING SITE EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 17,896 sf 0.41 ac EXISTING OPEN AREA = 124,304 sf 2.85 ac TOTAL SITE AREA = 142,200 sf 3.26 ac PROPOSED SITE * REQUIRED OPEN AREA = * 71,100 sf * 1.63 ac PROPOSED OPEN AREA = 77,670 sf 1.78 ac PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 64,530 sf 1.48 ac TOTAL SITE AREA = 142,200 sf 3.26 ac 12.6 % 87.4% 100% * 50% 54.6% 45.4% 100% * 25% MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA ALLOWED PER SHORELAND OVERLAY. IMPERVIOUS AREA UP TO 50% REQUIRES VARIANCE ISG Architecture Engineering EnriranmentA Planning I+S GROGP ,w,r,.o..Rro." 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax:507/333-9485 KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel agerr**1-e DATE 5/21/15 Lic. NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 C2-SITE DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET C2.11 \�/\ G \,,')^/ i� 1\! \ \ \\ GLCB \ GL-971.83 \ 1=9 631S \ 1=96 .08N \ \ A \ \\ \ T.N,F�H. BEN* \ MA1NK \ \ 976 3 \ \ \ \\ CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #1 (HATCH) TOP = 977.50' 100YR = 976.01' OUTLET = 975.50' BASE = 974.00' F&I: 15° HDPE FES W/6 CY MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP. ON MnDOT TYPE N \ GEOTEXTILE FABRIC \\ 1=973.5\0` (SEE DETAIL) \ CONSTRUCT PRETREATMENT BASIN #1 (HATCH) TOP = 977.50' N W L = 975.50' BASE = 973.00' ONNECT SP-1 TO INP. 15" SANITARY F&I: 15"x6" WYE CONNECTION. 1=973.53' (VERIFY DEPTH, SIZE, & LOCATION) SEE DETAIL i wfsoALEIN 1F I I I I i `TAN MH- R= 0 Lj7CK I `r%T 1 - - \JP` \ I ." I I TC=978.64 \\ a, 1=972.88\\ \ \\ \\ �\ \\ \\ Sp,t\\, SAN MH R=982.90 1=976.02S 1=975.56N CUT & CONNECT TO INPLACE 8" WATERMAIN. F&I: 8" TEE (VERIFY DEPTH, SIZE, & LOCATION) U \ 965.50 4.459.59 S=957.59 I 6 t- \ 3.S,o \\ \� < �1 - - \ 1 UE 0 I \ _ NOTES: • ALL UTILITIES THAT ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO 5' OUTSIDE OF BUILDING ARE TO BE CONNECT TO BUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. • ENSURE 18" VERTICAL BETWEEN ALL PROPOSED & EXISTING WATER, STORM, & SANITARY. F&I: 10" HDPE FES W/6 CY MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON __MnDOT TYPE N GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1=959.50 (SEE DETAIL) -15 (10") A-16) -SEE-DEFAIL < - - -M 0 CONNECT TO 4° WALL w - - DRAIN 1=974.00 < -- q F&I: 27'x4° NON-PERF. TC-977.50 HDPE (CONNECT TO A-5A) 1=973.90 S=971.90 PROPOSED UGHT POLE, TYP. P-5A (12) �\ (SEE LIGHTING PLAN) ( -5A SANITARY SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE PIPE NO. DRAIN FROM INLET ELEVATION DRAIN TO OUTLET ELEVATION PIPE SIZE PIPE TYPE PIPE GRADE PIPE LENGTH SP-1 S-1 973.96 INP. SANITARY 973.53 6" SDR-35 1.07% 41' SP-2 S-2 1974.67 S-1 973.96 6" SDR-35 1.07% 66' SP-3 976.23 S-2 974.67 6" SDR-35 1.07% 147' -5 (151 TC=979.46 �I 1=973.59 S=971.59 P�s 11v (A-6 TC=979.75 1=976.00 S=974.00 c CONNECT TO INP. GAS SERVICE (COORDINATE W/UTILTIY COMPANY) R=982.13 1=974.67 F&I: 22.5'x8" BEND I F&I: 8" GATE VALE & R=982.00 BOX (SEE DETAIL) 1=977.89 S=975.89 » UE A-4) CONNECT PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE TO INP. ELECTRIC (COORDINATE W/UTILITY COMPANY) SANITARY SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCT. NO. M.H. TYPE CASTING PAY HGT. LN FT. TOP OF CASTING ELEV. INVERT/SUMP ELEVATION PIPE NO. S-1 SANITARY SEWER MH NEENAH R-1755-G1 w/ 2 CONCEALED PICK HOLES 7.28 981.24 973.96 SP-1 S 2 SEWE MH SANIT RY NEENAH R-1755-G1 w/ 2 CONCEALED PICK HOLES 7.47 982.13 974.67 SP-2 SP-3 (6° F&I: 6° WATERMAIN I P-4 (12") • R=980.69 1=977.27 S=976.77 R=980.69 1=976.98 j� S=974.9, Q^ F&I: 5"x8' HYDRANT & 6" GATE VALE & BOX (SEE DETAIL) A-3) TC=980.80 1=976.86 S=972.86 P-3 (15`( ✓ 1 w ELM CREEK w w I j-P-9 (101 CART CORRAL I P-8A (6") (SEE C5.12) CONSTRUCT STORE ENTRANCE SUBDRAIN (SEE C5.12) -< -----< 0 __SAN MH R=972.54 LOCKED ,- &979.76__, `-,‘K,� 1=977.62 N S=977.12 N.,1 ` .. P-10 (6") (SEE C5.12) (A-13 SEE DETAIL, F&I: 12" HDPE FES W/6 CY MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON MnDOT TYPE N GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1=972.00 (SEE DETAIL)1 (A-11 P-11 (12" R=976.83 1=974.83 S=974.33 CONSTRUCT LOADING DOCK SUBDRAIN VERSION 6.0 PROTOTYPE LEFT HAND ENTRY, MODIFIED DOCK 18,539 SO FT (INCLUDING CANOPY) BUILDING SO FT: 17,825 CANOPY SO FT: 714 FFE = 981.25 \ SAN MH R=968.92 LOCKED LOADING DOCK SUBDRAIN . PROPOSED FIRE /DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (SEE ARCH) CONSTRUCT WATER (6"), ELECTRIC, & GAS SERVICES TO 5' OUTSIDE OUT OF BUILDING ,CONSTRUCT SP-3 TO 5' OUTSIDE OF BUILDING 1=976.23' • r,. CONSTRUCT P-3A TO 10" ROOF DRAIN 1=976.25' (COORDINATE W/MECHANICAL) I UE GUtt G 6"x8° TEE �sgE u I � I F&I: 8" WATERMAIN PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE (COORDINATE W/UTIUTY COMPANY) PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION (COORDINATE W/UTILITY COMPANY) PROPOSED GAS SERVICE W/uTII ITY COMPANY (SEE STRUCTURAL) P-3A (121 76479 /3 } 1=975.05 S=971.05 G UE 1=970.40 0 20 40 60 Scale: '-B.M. ELEVATION=976.30 T.N.F.H. LOCATED 280' NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF SIOUX DRIVE & CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD ,M--BEHIND THE EAST CURB OF SIOUX DRIVE • I R=964.50 / // // =959.06 7 / - / 5=957.06 / /a/ / // 1 / �/ .. K / CONNECT WALL SUBDRAIN TO A-1. 1=970.33 F&I: 6"x8" TEE & 5" G.V. & BOX 0\YX �O-17 `S R 1=973.86-977.75 $ 971.86 F&I: 6"x8" TEE - 1 I F&I: 6" WATERMAIN / F&I: 5%8' HYDRANT 8c VALE & BOX (SEE DETAIL) N STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE STRUCT. NO. M.H. TYPE CASTING CB TYPE 11 NEENAH R-3067 w/ TYPE VB GRATE A CB TYPE II W/SAFL BAFFLE NEENAH R-3067 w/ TYPE VB GRATE A CB TYPE II W/SAFL BAFFLE NEENAH R-3067 w/ TYPE VB GRATE A-4 CBMH TYPE II NEENAH R-4353 w/ BEEHIVE A CB TYPE II NEENAH R-3067 w/ TYPE V GRATE A-5A CB TYPE II NEENAH R-3067 w/ TYPE VB GRATE A-6 A-7 CB TYPE II STORM SEWER JUNCTION MH NEENAH R-3067 w/ TYPE VB GRATE NEENAH R-1733 w/ "STORM SEWER" IN COVER A-8 15" NYLOPLAST CATCH BASIN NYLOPLAST 1599 CGC w/ SOLID COVER A 12" NYLOPLAST CATCH BASIN 3' SQUARE CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER JUNCTION MH NEENAH R-3210 w/ TYPE Q GRATE NEENAH R-1733 w/ "STORM SEWER" IN COVER OUTLET STRUCTURE SEE DETAIL A 15 STORM SEWER JUNCTION MH NEENAH R-1733 w/ "STORM SEWER" IN COVER OUTLET STRUCTURE SEE DETAIL GIBMH TYPE II NEENAH R-4353 w/ BEEHIVE NEENAH R-3067 w/ TYPE V GRATE PAY HGT. LN FT. TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION ELEVATION PIPE NO MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON MnDOT TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1=959.00 (SEE DETAIL) 8c 8" PLUG P 10 P 12 STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULE DRAIN FROM INLET ELEVATION 976.25 973.59 DRAIN TO FES 5 FES A 15 OUTLET ELEVATION PIPE SIZE PIPE TYPE HDPE PREF. CMP PIPE GRADE PIPE LENGTH 00 61 26 51 a. ISG S GRO015- 4201 Bagley Ave. N Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Andrew T. Brandel I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 18408 C2-SITE DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - SITE UTILITY PLAN \ \\�\' 1'_/A I X`.. \ \ GLCB \ GL-971.83 \ 1=9 6.31S \ =96 .08N \ \ \ \ \ \--l4 N \\\ T.N,FH BENC MA K\ \\ 976.3 \ \ /\ \ \ / y,'1 /\ i \ \ \ \ y \\ CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #1 (HATCH) TOP = 977.50' 100YR = 976.01' OUTLET = 975.50' BASE = 974.00' \\ \\Y-8 \\\\\\ o,��/ \ \\ zr\ CONSTRUCT PRETREATMENT BASIN (HATCH) TOP = 977.50' N W L = 975.50' BASE = 973.00' 0 20 1 � » i LA 985 -. SAN MH R=982.90 40 60 Scale: B.M. ELEVATION=976.30 T.N.F.H. LOCATED 280' NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF SIOUX DRIVE & CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD BEHIND THE EAST CURB OF SIOUX DRIVE N \ \ \\ 988- NA \ o„ `987 \\ _ \ \ \ \ — ��� / � \ \\ �_ � � �M ��� r---------CM ECREEK __---w------ =�,�. x— -W ----w w 1 1 1 1 1 rrSAN MH R=990.92 \ \ \ 988- 989- \ — CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD - 982 481 — 985 984 VERSION 6.0 PROTOTYPE r LEFT HAND ENTRY, MODIFIED DOCK 18,539 SI) FT (INCLUDING CANOPY) BUILDING SQ FT: 17,825 i CANOPY SQ FT: 714 I i FFE = 981.25 / SEE SHEET C3.12 FOR SPOT ELEVATIONS AROUND BUILDING PERIMETER =y7g \ \ SAN MH --__ R=970 19 Lb�KElZ 7--„, ' CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #2 (HATCH)— \ N.TOP = 974.50' '10OYR = 972.45 OUTLET = 971.50' \ �\ BASe-- 970.00' \vim i \\ \ \ \\ A\ A \ram 1- r \ ,-- \ P_fOPOSED\pONCRETE RETAINING WkL \ ig r \y_/ APPIOX, T95 F -WETLAND NAREA TO BE FILLED (NAV) _ �g11 / SAN MH- R=9777.6,5 �= 45.34 1 / / // ,-- / _sl EXISTING SWALE GRADE sus_5 898= ,..._ — \\ \ ,\ — -982—8— _ l __ / /,„___ _849_� —98—� 988_ �\8 —__ \\\\\_�— _-983 —984.---- /// — ________ \\\ \----- — 66-878/ — -----989/ / / / / i�G / ISG Architecture Engineering EnriranmentA Planning I+S GRO1JP 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax:507/333-9485 ALDI KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel a l7ndr**1-e DATE 5/21/15 LIC. NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 C3-GRADE DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE SITE GRADING PLAN SHEET C3.11 TRANSITION AREA (FLUSH TO 6") ANGLE WALK TO BUILDING CORNER BUILDING CORNER BUILDING LINE TURNDOWN CONCRETE WALK TURNDOWN WALK TRANSITION N.T.S. TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION NOTE: CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A NON -SUP BROOM FINISH 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MnDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE J� O TURN DOWN WALK W/ PAVEMENT FLUSH SEE PLAN 1/2" RADIUS 2-ges, CONT. 6" CONCRETE WALK 2.OR MA%. j / \\%\\%\\%\\ \\%%\'\%\\\/ 12" SAND BASE ,sue TURN -DOWN CONCRETE WALK DETAIL N.T.S. IW = INSIDE WALL OW = OUTSIDE WALL CONCRETE LOADING DOCK (SEE LOADING DOCK PAVEMENT SECTION) PROPOSED BUILDING LINE DOCK WIDTH (SEE PLAN) E� Vi\\�ViA� V/\�� iA�AAiAAA� /\%\\\ \/\\-\� \i\\i\\\!\\i\\i/\ \�%\%\\\,-\\%\%�\\%\\%\\g ,\\-\\\ STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL (SEE 8" CONCRETE WALL DETAIL) LOADING DOCK RETAINING WALL TYPICAL SECTION ELEVATIONS N.T.S. 9B0 SEE TURNDOWN WALK TRANSITION DETAIL VERSION 6.0 PROTOTYPE LEFT HAND ENTRY, MODIFIED DOCK 18,539 SQ FT (INCLUDING CANOPY) BUILDING SQ FT: 17,825 CANOPY SQ FT: 714 FFE = 981.25 BUILDING PERIMETER SPOT ELEVATION PLAN D 10' 20' 9j40 FOF0 .8 SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB I TOP OF TURNED -DOWN WALK SPOT ELEVATION B.M. ELEVATION=976.30 T.N.F.H. LOCATED 280' NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF SIOUX DRIVE & CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD BEHIND THE EAST CURB OF SIOUX DRIVE 5 ISG Architecture Engineering EnriranmentA Planning ll ��.o..Rro.�� I+S GROV� 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax:507/333-9485 ALDI KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE 5/21/15 Lic. NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA MINNESOTA NO DATE REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 C3-GRADE DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE BUILDING PERIMETER SPOT ELEVATION PLAN AND DETAILS SHEET C3.12 PROPOSED BOLLARD, TYP. OF 4. (SEE ARCH.) F&I: "NO PARKING" STRIPING (YELLOW PAINT) (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED LIGHT LOCATION, TYP (SEE C6.11) CONNECT 4" PERFORATED SUBDRAIN TO P-8A. F&I: 6"x4" CROSS. 1=977.62 R=980.69 1=977.27 S=976.77 R=980.69 1=976.98 \ S=974.98 CONSTRUCT TURNDOWN STYLE CONCRETE WALK (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) F&I: PARKING LOT STRIPING, TYP. (WHITE PAINT) 1=978.20 SP-3 147c 6" 01.07% �0 1=978.66 P-9 70'x10" 00.50% CART CORRAL R=979.76 1=977.62 S=977.12 P-10 13'x6" 01.00% —OUTLINE OF CANOPY—1=977.75 1 I I 1 1 I� I 1 If( STORE ENTRANCE �I1� [ ] � I 1.. r,r 1 I I I 1J I..I� _. I PROPOSED BUILDING LINE J ,, ,I 1 1] 1. =977.75 P—SA 24'x6" 01.00% F&I: 45'x4" BEND, TYP. OF 2 CONSTRUCT 4" SUBDRAIN 01.00% MIN. (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION LOCATION (SEE ARCH.) PROPOSED DOOR LOCATION (SEE ARCH.) CONSTRUCT SP-3 TO 5' OUTSIDE OF BUILDING 1=976.23' STORE ENTRANCE DETAIL I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I] IIrII�I1I11II,1II VERSION 6.0 PROTOTYPE LEFT HAND ENTRY, MODIFIED DOCK 18,539 SQ FT (INCLUDING CANOPY) BUILDING SQ FT: 17,825 CANOPY SQ FT: 714 FFE = 981.25 PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION) FREE DRAINING GRANULAR BACKALL COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE MIN 3" ON ALL SIDES OF SUBDRAIN, AGGREGATE WRAPPED IN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4" PERFORATED HDPE SUBDRAIN, NO SOCK (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS) #5 ® 12" O.C.E.W. 12" MnDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (10) 1"0 x 36" LONG (F1554 GRADE 36) (1) 1"x20"x20" PLATE F&I: ELECTRIC CONDUIT FOR 10'x12' ILLUMINATED PYLON SIGN (COORDINATE W/SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN) 14"0 STD. PIPE COLUMN 48"0 REINFORCED CONCRETE PIER t 12" EMBEDMENT � 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT VARIES 12" CONCRETE RETAINING WALL TYPICAL DETAIL FOOD MARKET GRADE SEE DETAIL 'B' PROPOSED BITUMINOUS ���,� PAVEMENT SECTION (SEE � .� PLANS FOR LOCATION) #5 ® 12" O.C.E.W. FREE DRAINING GRANULAR BACKFILL COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE MIN 3" ON ALL SIDES OF SUBDRAIN, AGGREGATE WRAPPED IN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 4" PERFORATED HDPE SUBDRAIN, NO SOCK (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS) COMPACTED SUBGRADE #5 ® 12" O.C.E.W. 12" MnDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE NOTE: • WALL FACE AND GUARDRAIL COLOR & FINISH TO BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER • 4" PERFORATED HDPE SUBDRAIN TO CONNECT TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO STRUCTURE. SEE PLANS FOR CONNECTION LOCATIONS F&I: CUSTOM 9'x8' ILLUMINATED PYLON SIGN F&I: CUSTOM 2.5'x10' ILLUMINATED CABINET 14"0 STD. PIPE COLUMN 1"0 ANCHOR BOLT ASSEMBLY 36" LONG (F1554 GRADE 36) LEVELING NUT & WASHER 9'-4" CONCRETE FOOTING W/ (8) #6 BARS VERTICALLY & #4 TIES ® 12" O.C. W/UPPER (8) TIES ® 4" O.C. ALDI, INC. PYLON SIGN DETAIL 42" GUARDRAIL PAINTED & PRIMED 12" EMBEDMENT `1/2" EXPANSION JOINT IES 2—10"=-8" 8" CONCRETE RETAINING WALL TYPICAL DETAIL 1"=5' DETAIL'B' N.T.S. 3/8" CONTINUOUS FILLET WELD (1 1-1/4"x20"x20" PLATE F&I: ELECTRIC CONDUIT FOR 10'x12' ILLUMINATED PYLON SIGN (COORDINATE W/SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN) HEX NUT 3/8" PLATE WASHER 4 TIES ® 12" O.C. CONCRETE PIER (MINIMUM 4000 P.S.I.) 8) #6 BARS VERTICAL ISG ArcNicecture Engineering Environmental Planning I +S GROCJIY 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax:507/333-9485 ALDI KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE 5/21/15 Lic. NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA MINNESOTA NO DATE REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 C5-DETAILS DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE SITE DETAILS SHEET C5.12 k n1 0 -�iF-5 rn. _T--f 4 ,,7 4 ---A- -- V# ° 13 + 0 2 °1'D 0 7 °24 Qi. ' k 9 61 { < - -. iik2 < - - <0'S 001 o a,�% _.. -- . , ,6 Q + + °5 0. •' 16���� 15 �° �� n49 . Q15 �4 kp4 1.51 Al �I 1 2V 2 2�5 1�9 L ! F ° :0�� 6ft��-`°s,'F °452 I 219 + -° 2. '' �14 2�9 ' + 2 �° 8 :" FF « + 345 2 + 4� � 1. ' p�6 315 +41 °�l - \5 + 2�1 212 1. 1 A) 4.10 t 1 t --, CART CORRAL �1060 :I 2a °*a. A 45-41 +i2252�01�� + �1� Ear { Q4 Q1 \ 5+p6 3gp 4 ly• I 'A ---- 2 �g a I.I� 12 } 44 4- 2+060 FF r • • • 1' aSO 00000* r . go 4 h3 5q8 p+ 541 4ka34p0 p�Q3193�3 a532�a4 m .• Al 64 34� A VERSION 6.0 PROTOTYPE +r X) LEFT HAND ENTRY, MODIFIED DOCK IX 0 ' 1 f1 i I } 6 +4a 3 5aQ 3 26 9 216 1 9 2 6 1 2 213 % ;118,539 SQ FT (INCLUDING CANOPY) 1�o---,-,km- 1' BUILDING SQ FT: 17,825 ' Q l05 - 1 11 2 is r CANOPY SQ FT: 714 • o 0 4 0° 6 1. i A- 1.4a 1 FFE = 981.25 O: . 0�, 05 l9 A5 24 2 . 9 91 a 1.•5 1... • YT • 12°V' Qoi� 1'�604 4 I9 1. 1 2.6 51 +A ,r 0. , l ` 6 °{55 + 5g p 4 1'\. 22,1 _, 9 2 42 L 2�5 2�52 201 .1fire • ' � t ��., -- `,. 040 0 1-12 1 1 3 4 2 2;6 011 + . , 6 °� 25 50 + 25 21 ' 1 & ,.. + 045 \�4 \- 251 04\ + o1a ; S5 '°-, 19 +�1 2 55 25 ,1 35 •i • I + 013 a. 5 + ,\ 1 2. BB }� 2 tt I \••••••••••••-•••••••••••••r•••••4 0 \0 + 016 O:c4 , 0 144 4 }45 1 i + 2Q 4a I I I•II I•II 12 \ 1 '�16elk0�I 11 II AO, *SOSO ................. 4 2N 0. 4 p2 Q3 4 ° vy 2 �9 111 1 "�I Spre•Wee o�ES25 +� 4 Q^ o$ �,, iwa�� - na��„ �1 03 15 '�5+p 1+42 ' . �> 2�00 1. 45 3 1 } 310 ;2 14\i1'� ,yr :.IQ k 4 I 9 3 1p 1�a p3 ,i + Q, 4 4 +2 Oo 1 + q b 1. o.s. 00 1.Oo v D. }}'`\ oS - ��{ 5 Q�8 0 + 2 � 19 Q 9 1." �+55 Q Al .. �,.5�so 1 :. 0 51�Lt�r�� '" +14 1, ° 0 ,0. , • Q° 1 5 U ova 4 } _P� 2 k °., Q �a ° a � 9_ �_. 01 112 o Q�4 0+05 + Q14 + 0.26 + Q{ 2 4 0 11 + 014 04�.-r, ,, - r�-� � n 00 q 1 0. A + Q�8 010 + p�2 0 4 019 + 01P, �l °� jA4 014 L_ Q�4 pU4 Q03 0�3 � \ pQ4 Qp5 o1Q 014 04° oa2 Q 3 � a °� off° Q 3 p 3 Q�2 Al ° k 0o p 2 o+• O3 Q+p6 0�� Qua o4 +_. not k 10\ \ 0�4 05 p6 0 Q�a Oa o3 O 02 °° + 112 A_ 0�{{3 { p�3 0�4 °�05 Q�4 0�5 o�Nk. iCr410lik. xgfia �5 Q°`' ° ,v Al O 0�0A � A7QU2oU3 oU003Q4 Attob, ° 4°°405° 02 QQ\ +°1 A22 oO2 02 oO2 0�2 �32 0°3 °� Q o° °� °� Q� °2 Q Q o01 °0 .1 o O2 2 0�2 o+O2 �2 °+O21°2 ° + n�2 vI ,a A. n o) 001 ° 01 k 6 02 + 01 00\ °p1 0. + p� °O2 + p1 0 + \sp a- 10� � � p p1 °G'ANEiDl�1N PACIFIC RAILROAD � Q1 ° Q1 + p 01 ° + p 01 Q'01 + 01 00® 00\ OOk n+m _+ 001 0• ° + r}n1 �0\ ° en, 001 001 k r+m 001 +,, 001 o° �a 4 5 4 () .16 V. }:1 0,� ��P�1 ' } �o , -j + + 415 441 k q l 3 6 . � + 2) V 1. LCC CC .:1 01 t �A + QQ1 01 N 001 1 °� a o °fit k a gJl � } ��5_° � _ �o ° n'76° ' 1,� - �1� ' _.. _ .� Q L-- O O'er OCK ° 0 53 a o�2-0 _+ o a _.._ O 0 1 �� �, �'tFr 1 "9 0 � �4 0�2 0�1T"� � 0_ -..- Q. - o a o, °oq� Q 5 Q. ,U 'gy p �, ,9 ,1.- 9 �� `i- -- -,,, 4 �s�D � 7�1 0�2 �� o��o�o pro °�9 0�2 � p0 . ; , � o- °�QO:, �0 0 1 '''''''-'-*\*.1, \ *�0 �. �• . '� I L1 Q RA MH9 QO LOCKED \ + Q�0 00 0+02 q.o11 0�0 0�0 • O2 ° p�0 ° Oo �2 00'\ • +v+010• 001 v0. 001 Q�0 o� \ 0. 1\ \� Q�0 \0�0 °�00\\ \�00 • �j0 00 0�!)\ p 0 NI 0 0"0 ° sA 02 pt,2 0 + 01 � ° Quo Q ou v1 Quo 0 01 •t n 0 Ok00 nk12 0 �1 ° FOOTCANDLE LEGEND 0.50 FOOTCANDLE UNE 1.00 FOOTCANDLE UNE 5.00 FOOTCANDLE UNE 0 50 1.00 5.00 0 20 40 60 Scale: 1 4 GALVANIZED STEEL ANCHOR BOLTS 3/4"0 CONDUIT 4 #6 s VERTICAL W/#4 TIES ® 12" O.C. 24"0 CONCRETE PIER FOOTING LIGHT POLE DETAIL N.T.S. Provide light fixtures as shown on Fixture Schedule. Substitutions shall have prior approval by the Prolect Engineer before bid date. Being listed as an acceptable Manufacturer in no way relieves the Contractors obligation to provide all equipment and features in accordance with these specifications. LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE BB STYLE SITE POLE DOUBLE HEAD 090 POLE HEAD(S) CC .SITE POLE DOUBLE HEAD 0180 POLE HEAD(S) DD SITE POLE QUAD HEAD 090 POLE HEAD(S) EE LED WALL SCONCE BUILDING MOUNTED FF WALL PACK COLUMN PILASTERS MANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBER CREE LIGHTING / (1) #CL-SSP-5011-26-D3-SV (2) ARE -EDG-4M-DA-06-E-UL-SV-700-40K CREE LIGHTING / (1) #CL-SSP-5011-26-D2-SV (2) ARE -EDG-4M-DA-06-E-UL-SV-700-40K CREE LIGHTING / (1) #CL-SSP-5011-26-D6-SV (3) ARE -EDG-4M-DA-O6-E-UL-SV-700-40K CREE LIGHTING / SEC -EDG-4M-WM-04-E-UL-SV-700 CREE LIGHTING / AL-42WLED-UD-120-SC LAMPS 134W LED 134W LED 134W LED 46W LED 42W LED REMARKS SEE SITE PLAN FOR BASE DETAIL 2C-0" POLE 9" ARM MOUNT STANDARD SEE SITE PLAN FOR BASE DETAIL 2C-0" POLE 9" ARM MOUNT STANDARD SEE SITE PWtl FOR BASE DETAIL 2C-0" POLE 9" ARM MOUNT STANDARD MOUNT FIXTURE AT 12'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR MOUNT FIXTURE AT 7-6" ABOVE GROUND ON FACE OF CART WALL PILASTERS. PROVIDE UPLIGHT LOUVER KIT #RS9062-DO-CS ISG Architecture Engineering Environmental Flaming I5 GROGI...e..yro.rom - ALDI KEY PLAN 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax:507/333-9485 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel andr DATE 5/21/15 Llc. NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 C6-LIGHT DRAWN BY KDM DESIGNED BY KDM REVIEWED BY MDN ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE SITE LIGHTING PLAN SHEET C6.11 TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. SS — GREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT: —ADD PL NTINGS AS DETAILED IN — OREEK ANK INaPROVEMENTPLA-N — — —(SEESHEETL371)-(SHADEDAREAr - _-- = -975 _ _ — — 975 N-� 973 9I2-_ 975 ._. -� .— _ _ _ _ .�.. ..�-•r"� � •---` ~—_`--- z. ' 979 \\ ����r i / 1 ♦-� �i �e 2 Scale: . - ‘, CART CORRAL �y \ � - - - 2lRgiji MAW , NM 04.000 ONO* ftw011e 01,111 MO JCY IWOOMMOINNVI 0 000000 00000 MOO SO I WO VERSION 6.0 PROTOTYPE LEFT HAND ENTRY, MODIFIED DOCK 18,539 SQ FT (INCLUDING CANOPY) BUILDING SQ FT: 17,825 CANOPY SQ FT: 714 FFE = 981.25 / UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UTILITIES ON -SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. )\ 2 une I' PLANT SYMBOL KEY DECIDUOUS TREES EVERGREEN TREES DECIDUOUS SHRUBS EVERGREEN SHRUBS EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN WITH TREE # Y / nd 1 --� / / d`/\ / // , I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS / / / PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION /..-- / / // AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF oeC \ /* ///�,// MINNESOTA. ' / / i1/// // /J / ///// / / / DATE 31---- // / / / I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ISG Architernre Engineering Environmena9 Planning S GROUP ALDI KEY PLAN 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel:507/333-9460 Fax:507/333-9485 LIC NO /=i / / .___,,,,/ //i _--- // T / \ \ ,,:E J/ �n ,%, \ \\ / 1\, ` `T ___ _ , \ \ 979 —981 — - - _982— — _ i ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Cory W.Tauer DATE 5/12/15 LIC NO 42181 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HS GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA NO DATE MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 15408 LBASE DRAWN BY CWT DESIGNED BY CWT REVIEWED BY CWT ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET L1.11 TREE REMOVALS AND REQUIRED CALIPER INCHES THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED TABLE GENERAL NOTES: - LANDSCAPE WORK TO BE COMPLETED AFTER COMPLETION OF FINISH GRADING. FINISH GRADING BY OTHERS. - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL VISIT SITE BEFORE SUBMITTING A BID. THIS WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE FULL UNDERSTANDING OF SITE CONDITIONS. - IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLANT LIST OR NOTES AND THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE NUMBERS. OR AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WILL BE CORRECT. - ALL PLANTS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. -ALL DECIDUOUS TREES MEASURED BY CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURED AT A POINT 6" UP FROM THE TRUNKS ROOT COLLAR. - ALL TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE SURROUNDED BY A MINIMUM 2 FOOT RADIUS BED WITH 31NCH DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. -CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS WILL HAVE BEEN PLANTED IN THE CONTAINER FOR A MINIMUM OF SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION ON -SITE. ALL PLANTS WILL BE GUARANTEED FOR FULL REPLACEMENT A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST TWO FULL YEARS (730 DAYS) AFTER INSTALLATION ON SITE. - IF THE CONTRACTOR FEELS THERE MAY BE AN ERROR, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. - PLANT SYMBOLS SHOWN ARE FOR LOCATING THE POSITIONS FOR PLANTING. SIZES SHOWN DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE TRUE PLANT SIZE EITHER AT TIME OF INSTALLATION OR WHEN FULL GROWN. -LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO THE PROPERTY FROM INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.0 General: 1.01 Landscape work Includes, but Is not limited to, removal of weeds, top soil Installation, soil preparation, installation of edging, Installation of irrigation system, planting of trees, shrubs, and groundcover, Mal grading, installation of erosion control fabric, mulching, weed control, clean-up, and regular maintenance during construction and the establishment period. 1.02 No part of this work shall be performed or installed in any location or manner, which may endanger the health, safety, or welfare of the public now, n the future. Construction means, methods, techniques, sequencing, etc:, are the sole responsibility of the Contractor. 1.03 The Contractor agrees that he/she shall assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of this project including safety of all persons and property; that this requirement shall apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours; and that the contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold the Owner and Landscape Architect harmless from any and all liability, real or alleged, in connection with the performance of work on this project, excepting for liability arising from the sole negligence of the Owner or Landscape Architect. 1.04 The Contractor shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, laws, and ordinances imposed by Authorities having Jurisdiction over this project site. 1.05 Contractor shall immediately give written notice to the Landscape Architect of conflict in any part of plans, notes, or specifications. Request clarification from MS Group as appropriate. 1.06 Contractor shall field -verify existing conditions. 1.06.1 'Existing conditions" for the work as specified herein are based on the work described in the 18S Group drawings, and on the assumption that the work described in these drawings will be completed as described. 1.06.2 Immediately report discrepancies or variances between the existing conditions and the I&S Group drawings in writing to the owner's representative. If the Contractor begins work specified herein without the notification to 18S Group, the Contractor thereby acknowledges acceptance of the site "As -Is" and shall perform the work shown on the drawings and specified herein in accordance with the accepted base bid. 1.07 Prior to construction, the Contractor shall be responsible for locating all underground utilities. 1.07.1 Existing utility lines to be removed which may not be shown on construction drawings are presumed to be present within the Site. Contractor shall not proceed with such utility lines removal. Contractor shall contact I&S Group Immediately upon discovery of an unidentified underground utility piping. I&S Group will then direct the Contractor as to the appropriate action tobe taken. 1.08 Contractor shall avoid damage to utilities, structures, site appurtenances, etc., which occur as a result of the landscape construction. 1.09 The Landscape Contractor is responsible for verifying all quantities shown on these plans before pricing the work. Any difference In quantities shall be brought to the attention of 18.5 Group for clarification. 1.10 All substitutions shall be requested in writing and shall be approved by the I&S Group landscape architecture department, 507-387-6651. 1.11 If any areas which appear to need landscape installation, but are not shown as landscaped on the plans, notify I&S Group landscape architecture department immediately. 1.12 All registered chemicals used on this project shall be handled and applied in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. 1.13 Clean-up the site at completion of this work, leave the site in an attractive condition. 1.14 Upon completion of installation the contractor shall issue a Certificate of Completion stating the project name and the following: "I, (state licensed contractor's name) hereby certity, under penalty of perjury, that the Installation of landscape and irrigation for the above project is complete and conforms with the city and owner approved plans and specifications, with the exception of the following deviations (list approved deviations, and who approved them)." The certificate shall be signed by the Contractor's license holder. 1.15 Prior to starting installation the contractor shall confirm that the construction set of plans are signed or stamped for approval by the city. Notify the landscape architect immediately if a city approval stamp or signature is not visible on the drawings. 2.0 Site and Soil Preparation: 2.01 The top 8 inches of soil shall be free of rocks, concrete, and foreign materials larger than 2 inches in diameter. Road base material shall not be present in the top 24 inches of soil. Any soil mixed with road base shall be removed and disposed of oft -site. 2.02 Final grades shall be smooth and even, providing an attractive appearance. Concentrated flows of water shall not drain over walks. Contact landscape architect if this appears unavoidable. Landscape materials shall not block or interfere with the free flow of drainage water. 2.03 Planting areas shall slope at 2 % minimum away from building foundations and footings. Positive drainage shall be provided In all planting areas. No standing water shall be permitted. A maximum grade difference of 1/2 inch shall be allowed between sidewalks or curbs and the finish surface in planters. 2.04 The planting soil mixture specified for planters shall be free of clay and is to be composed of topsoil and additional amendments and backfilled to a depth of 24". Amend the lop 8 inches of topsoil in all planted areas with the following materials. Quantities are minimums per 1000 square feet. 2.04.1 [3] cubic yards of nitrolized compost. Compost shall have a 1/2 inch maximum particle size, a ph of 6.5 or higher, shall be cured for 60 days or re after composting, shall meet all EPA guidelines, and shall be weed and pathogen free. 2.04.2 [10] Ibs of agricultural gypsum. 2.04.3 [26] Ibs of 16-16-16 fertilizer. 2.05 All planting areas, including areas to be sodded, shall receive the following soil preparation prior to planting: a minimum of 8 inches of lightly compacted topsoil shall be installed over the subsoil if topsoil has been removed or is not present. If topsoil filters down into the subsoil, additional topsoil shalt be applied until a stable 8 inch deep layer of topsoil is maintained. The top 8 inches of topsoil in the planters shall be machine -tilled taerate the son and alleviate any surface compaction. 2.06 The burden of proof of soil amendment Installation rests with the Contractor. Soil tests may be required at the Contractor's expense in order to confirm amendment installation. 3.0 Planting: 3.01 Rough grading shall be completed prior to the start of planting in any given area of the project site. 3.03 Plants shall be well branched and bushy with good color, plant size should be in proportion to the pot as described by the American Standard for Nursery Stock. Plants delivered to the site that are yellow, sparse, burned. or barren will be rejected. Plant pots shall have soil to within 1 inch of the rim and the plants shall be fully rooted in the container. Plant material with racked or broken root -balls shall be removed from the site. All plants shall be high quality with a securely attached id tag, have normal growth and should be free from disease, insects, or insect eggs. Plants shall conform with the minimum standards of ANSI z60 - the American Standard for Nursery Stock. Trees may not have been topped (upright branches at top of may not be cut or pruned). 3.04 Plants shall exceed the minimum size at planting requirements noted on the plans, regardless of the size of the container. No exceptions. Prepare bids based on the plant size, not the container size. A larger container size plant may be required to meet the plant size minimums. No cost adjustments will be allowed for use of larger container plants. Measurements shall be made with the plant in a natural, unsupported position. 3.05 Plants specified as "gallon," "container," or "box" on the plans shall conform to the ANSI z60, American Standard for Nursery Stock requirements for sizes with equivalent numbers (#1, 45, 415, #24, etc.,) as if specified as such on the plans. Thus a plant labeled as "5 gallon" size on the plans must be equivalent to a 45 container size plant as described in the American Standard for Nursery Stock. 3.06 Tree calipers shall be measured 6 inches above the rootball per ANSI z60, American Standard for Nursery Stock. Tree heights shall be measured from top of rootball to top of highest branch. 3.07 Trees shall be planted 4'0" or more from hardscapes, such as sidewalks, foundations, curbs, patios, etc. when possible. 3.08 Trees shall not be planted within 4'0" of buried utility lines, relocate trees sllghtiy, if not possible notify landscape architect. 3.09 A vertical clearance of 114 inches is required above all disabled accessible parking spaces, a vertical clearance of 80 inches is required above all walkways. Trim trees to remove all limbs within these areas for ADA compliance. 3.10 Turf areas shall be sloped as required to provide positive drainage to the perimeter, or to drain inlets. Turf shall be installed flush with the top of surrounding curls and walks so as to prevent water from puddling at the turf edges, import top soil if necessary to comply with this requirement. 3.11 All sad turf shall be rolled with a weighted roller after installation. 4.0 Mulch: 4.01 When rock mulch is indicated, install a 3" deep layer of 1"-2" dia. rock. 4.02 When rock mulch is Indicated, place mulch onto a water permeable filter fabric. Such fabric shall be of substantial quality and include a manufacturer warranty of a minimum of 10 years. 4.03 When wood mulch is indicated, install premium shredded hardwood SITE NOTES: IRRIGATION REQUIRED - IRRIGATE ALL TREES, SODDED AREAS, AND PLANTING BEDS SOUTH OF LAWN LIMIT LINE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE IRRIGATION DESIGN. PLANT BED EDGER- USE POLY EDGER PLANTING BEDS - SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 3" DEPTH HARDWOOD MULCH. DO NOT USE AN UNDERLAYMENT. NO PLASTIC OR FILTER FABRIC. SEE SHEET L3.11 FOR CREEK RESTORATION PLANS SOD/SEED - REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND TYPE. WITHIIN CREEK BUFFER ZONE (NORTH OF LAWN LIMIT LINE) CUT ALL TREES UNDER 8" IN DIA. TO FLUSH WITH GROUND. DO NOT REMOVE STUMPS. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE WITH SOIL. AVOID USE OF LARGE EQUIPMENT ON SLOPES. EXISTING SHRUBS MAY REMAIN. FOR ALL TREES REMOVED - CUT FLUSH WITH GROUND. DO NOT REMOVE STUMPS LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: LANDSCAPE REQUIRED FOR PERIMETER OF 1710 LF: 34 SHADE TREES (1710 LF/50) 17 ORNAMENTAL TREES (1710 LF/100) 57 SHRUBS (1710 LF/30) WITH 34 CALIPER INCHES OF TREE MITIGATION. LANDSCAPE PROPOSED: 62 TOTAL SHADE TREES (387 CAL. INCHES) 34 PROPOSED SHADE TREES (68 CAL. INCHES) 28 REMAINING EXISTING TREES (319 CAL. INCHES) 17 PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREES 210 PROPOSED SHRUBS 320 LF PROPOSED CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT 145 LF PROPOSED SLOPE INFILTRATION BASIN REMOVAL OF UNSAFE/UNHEALTHY TREES PRUNING OF EXISTING REMAINING TREES mulch to a minimum depth of 3 inches. All mulched areas shall also incorporate a granular pre -emergent herbicide, such as Preen, to aid in weed abatement. No permeable filter fabric should be used unless called for on the plan. 5.0 Slopes: 5.01 See grading plans for slopes locations and gradients 5.02 Notify the landscape architect prior to starting work if any area on this site is found t0 have a slope exceeding It 7.0 Landscape Maintenance: 7.01 The Contractor shall maintain the landscape 8 irrigation throughout construction and up to opening date. 7.02 The Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining a regular watering schedule for all sodded areas for a minimum of 30 days after installation to ensure proper establishment 7.03 The Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions required to protect plants throughout the maintenance period from abnormal temperatures. 8.0 Observations: 8.01 The Contractor shall request a final observation by the owner's representative upon completion of installation. 8.02 Observation must be requested 7 days in advance of the anticipated dale of the observation. 8.03 Prior to requesting the final observation it is the contractor's responsibility to assure that the work is finished and complies with all clearly stated requirements of the plans, including plant sizes and quantities. Substantial noncompliance will result in the assessment of penalties against the Contractor, to be not less than the cost of the observation. Any of the following shall be considered proof of substantial non-compliance: 8.03.1 Installed quantity of any item is less than 95% of that specified. 8.03.2 More than 3% of any plant variety are undersize. 8.03.3 More than 3% of any plant variety aredead or dying. Dying is defined as wilting or loss of more than 30% of leaves (deciduous leaf drop excepted.) 9,0 Guarantee: 9.01 The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee all landscape work for a period of time, beginning at the start of the maintenance period, as follows: 9.01.1 Trees - two growing seasons. 9.01.2 Shrubs, lawn and groundcover- two growing seasons. 00 NOT KE ROUGH ROOT BALL FINISHED GRAD 9.01.3 Irrigation system - one year. -' =1 I: y urvDls7u Beu SOIL ICI= =1C=1 11- 9.02 Theft, vandalism, and death due to acts of God are excluded from this warranty. IF AN EVERGREEN: - NEVER CUT LEADER - PRUNE ONLYTO REMOVE DAMAGED BRANCHES STAKING IS DISCOURAGE, HOWEVER, IF NEEDED, USE 2. WIDE WEBBING STRAPS WITH HEAVY GAUGE WIRE. WIRE SHOULD STICK STRAIGHT OUT AS SHOWN, BUT NOT TIGHT. REMOVE AFTER ONE YEAR, ROOT COLLAR SHALL BE SET t FINISH GRADE. 3' DEEP HARD WOOD MULCH. OVER PRE -EMERGENT WEED CONTROL GRANULES. KEEP MULCHB BACK FROM TRUNK. ACKFIL I WITH EXISTINO SOIL. LE WATERTE AIRD NOTO E�LT MINATE AIR. 00 NOT TAMP, SET ROOT BALL FLAT ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. REMOVE OR CUT TOP AND FOLD DOWN WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP. REMOVE ALL POLY TIES. TREE PLANTING DETAIL IG IooT�TM �I I EDGER FINAL GRADE n=ul aTI UNDISTURIsla fir& TO PAVED SURFACE 4 MULCH AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN OVER PRE-ENERGENT WEED CONTROL GRANULES SIDEWALK/CURB WITH BETWEEN AT SIDES ID SAPLANTING AND ALL SPACE BERNEEN PLANTS TO FULL DEPTH. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL ISG Architee ure Engineering &Irlronmenal Planning www.v:-yrp.com �I KEY PLAN 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel" 507/333-9460 Fax:507/333-9485 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Cory W.Tauer Corz. y.%a ee..,a- DATE 5/12/15 LIC NO 42181 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF IAS GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 LBASE DRAWN BY CWT DESIGNED BY CWT REVIEWED BY CWT ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE LANDSCAPE NOTES & PLANT LIST SHEET L1.12 I \. _G— —I------- ----- I — I o— 1 — — — — — — — — — �c<=--c — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — L, _�-- � �_ -------------- -'--4ua_—_,m=__ —_ —-------------------- -- 71— —-------- - ---A —- — 45 — —i— so — -- i i� �� — 54 ally 5 6 --- / /ems _ _ Imo — — _ — -- \ \ --i - 1- 1 €1 — ___ -%—_-- — 49 r M \ 47- i \ ` — INPLACE TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. 48 53 _w w — — 5 �— — — — — — — —ECM—CREEK CREEK - --w-= — M — _\ mow_ — �M — w — 4 �— —9so—= —9_ 13 _ —16 18— — =1.1— — —� 2 j — 29\ \ �30� \\ \ 32 2-6 I \ \\ \ \ —96 � — _— — — -965- —22 — 33 M -\ 28 A3 14 — — _ \ �� � —�-23 J25 � � -27I���� � � \ � • T iF�'� —_vim\\31 'I 34 / --\r-1`.If —`G��\\� 11,.Y�� d 3//- \\ \\ \\ \\ \ v v 9ARS' •\ \ \ v v y— / vv vv �zvvv 2',� \ \ „.,- /,' y vv `��,�/ vvv ��� e,� 'v i v /V=9728$ \ V ,, 1a /v i A--‘,., 9j9 \ \ ' \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ /\\ \__�-L,_ \.. vxga2� vvv i' / v v Ilz-f1 STF�EN -- \ )k WE • \/ 11 55 , .),/ CLEAR & GRUB INPLACE TREE 20 40 60 EXISTING BUILDING ---- , --, N -•,,,,\,,,N\-g\ 60 61 — — — ISG +S GRO1J15- 4201 Bagley Ave. N Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Andrew T. Brandel I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 TREE REMOVAL DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO TREE REMOVAL PLAN -965- — -964— — — -966— — —965 — 965— _- 964- — — -963 — 962� 9616' yo 2 `V' -- — — —964- •••` \ �. — N��` - - yam- __ �♦ \\ --- .. -----7 _ ___ _ 1 �♦♦ ��M -P POR OSED ELM CREEK IMPROVEMENT AREA -.11--_ I \��♦♦ (SHADE) (SEE TYPICAL SITE PLAN BELOW) ♦♦ �• ��,-� �♦♦ �� --,, ...'... \ \ \ \ \ \ / -952 / / / / PROTECT INPLACE — 961- THE — 961960 _M��_ / -959— — 960— W---------1_YY�958 W9— — — — --W — 1 —959-- -- i 9fi0� — — — =CESS TO ELM CREEK FILTRATION BERM TYPICAL GRADING PLAN — Q 3- -Y - - 960 _- (�---------- - CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT NOTES • NO WORK OR ACCESS WITHIN OR THROUGH THE BED OF DNR PUBLIC WATER SHALL OCCUR WITHIN MARCH 15TH TO JUNE 15TH OR DURING FLOODING EVENTS • CONTRACTOR IS ENCOURAGED TO PERFORM BANK STABILIZATION DURING TIME FRAMES OF LOW CREEK FLOWS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS CO-PERMITTEE UNDER THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 50 FEET OF ELM CREEK SHALL HAVE REDUNDANT BMP'S INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL PRIOR TO THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. • HORIZONTAL EXTENTS ARE SHOWN AS APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS OF CUT/FILL AND RIPRAP PRIOR. TO PLACEMENT WITH PROJECT ENGINEER. • NATURAL STONE RIPRAP SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 5 FEET HORIZONTAL INTO THE BED OF ELM CREEK AND HAVE A 3:1 FINISHED SLOPE. • ALL DISTURBED WOODED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH SEED MIXTURE 36-211 AND IMMEDIATELY OVERLAID WITH STAPLED CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (NATURAL NET ONLY) OR OTHER TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AS APPROVED BY PROJECT ENGINEER. 6"-30" NATURAL STONE RIPRAP ON MnDOT TYPE 7 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP. 12" BIOROLL,T. TYP. (STAKED _ PROPOSED PLANTINGS, TYP. (SEE L1.12 FOR PLAN' UST & PLANTING DETAILS) ELM CREEK BANK SEEDING, TYP. 111=1 I —I -111-111-111 111-1 H6' MAX EW EXISTING SUBGRADE (B-B) CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT TYPICAL SECTION 7' ELM CREEK WIDTH VARIES '6J IMAX III � I III' 'III— 1_=1 IIII N.T.S. 0 10 20 30 Scale: B.M. ELEVATION=976.30 T.N.F.H. LOCATED 280' NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF SIOUX DRIVE & CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD BEHIND THE EAST CURB OF SIOUX DRIVE VARIES EXISTING SLOPE a 15% PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE 11 -III—III: 1= EXISTING SUBGRADE SCARIFY & REMOVE 8" BELOW EXISTING GRADE & REPLACE W/BIOREfENTION SOIL (SEE C5.13 FOR BIOREfENTION SOIL REQUIREMENTS) (A -A) SLOPE FILTRATION BERM TYPICAL SECTION 1-111= L=11 I I I , I 1 -1 I I=11=1 11=1 I= 11=1111=1 11, 111-111 N.T.S. ELM CREEK IMPROVEMENT SEEDING Filtration berm and surrounding areas shall be seeded with MnDOT seed mixture 36-211 and comply with MnDOT 2575 & 3876. Mulch shall be MnDOT Category 3 wood fiber blanket, natural net and comply with MnDOT 2575 & 3885. Fertilizer shall be MnDOT Type 4, 18-1-18 (NPK) and comply with MnDOT 2575 & 3881. Mulch and fertilizer shall be applied incidental to seeding. • SEEDING - Seed shall be placed in all other disturbed areas at a rate of 34.5 Ibs/ac and fertilized at 100 Ibs/ac. *ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED* ELM CREEK BANK RESTORATION QUANTITIES ITEM Loon 4UPORTY PROPOSED SILT FENCE LF 160 125 BIOROLL LOG LF 320 PROPOSED SEEDING AC SAE 6,30' RIPRAP SF 635 CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 90 ISG Architecture Engineering EnriranmentA Planning www.vn•grp.eom I+ S G RO OW 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax:507/333-9485 ALDI KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel t/ l7 r*ode DATE 5/21/15 uc. NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. F&I: MnDOT MnDOT SEED MIXTURE 36-211 & MnDOT CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (NATURAL NET ONLY) (SHADE) �ti7; fir, rr f: j .I ----:j,R'erjj }••'-�<''fr`'fi._ cq -�d•ir. ._ • /t , si s ."►^.wj`r- / r:S:F/ B.frr�/'er /� ySsS;F--� / SF�/I •JT/+r a/.SF: a a�if{=u ..:rrfrC"i�W111�� YrTir `_ s I I I I I I I I 6"-30" NATURAL STONE RIPRAP ON MnDOT TYPE 7 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP. (HATCH) 0 ACCESS TO ELM CREEK I I SF r - r:e'Prrjallrtir.'j.,rjr7243:4r 411 :Ma ♦ iL► -r: "•. T rr la ylr, r rr''if"•i ra j�a%a AWN 1 r UMW �Lf.� F&I: SILT FENCE (SEE C4.13 FOR DETAIL) 0 _W 10 ELM CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT TYPICAL SITE PLAN — — 5F PROTECT INPLACE TREE, TYP. (L- I -- PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA MINNESOTA NO DATE REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 CREEK IMPROVEMENT DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 05/21/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - TITLE ELM CREEK BANK IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHEET L3.11 REAR DOCK AREA SUMMARY OCCUPANCY USE ROOM NAME SQUARE FOOTAGE MERCANTILE SALES / ENTRY / EXIT 10,597 OFFICE 215 BREAK ROOM 294 Issued: Date: A Issued for Use/Reference 03/30/15 B PLOTTED: 3/30/2015 4:12 PM MEN'S ROOM 86 WOMEN'S ROOM 85 HALL 180 SUBTOTAL (MERCANTILE) 11,457 STORAGE / STOCK BACKROOM 3,229 COOLER 1,470 FREEZER 730 SUBTOTAL (STORAGE / STOCK) 5,429 SUBTOTAL (OCCUPANCIES) 16,886 EXTERIOR /INTERIOR WALLS / UNOCCUPIED SPACE 939 BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE 17,825 EXTERIOR CANOPY 714 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE (INCLUDING CANOPY) 18,539 (73) MODEL 563W CART STORAGE REAR DOCK OPERATIONS DATA ITEM V6.0 PROTOTYPE ALDI MEDINA PLAN LINEAR FOOTAGE OF BASE (PRODUCE INCLUDED) 842'-0" ASSUMED PALLET STORAGE 70 70 BUILDING DIMENSIONS 118'-0" x 147'-4" SALES FLOOR DIMENSIONS 72'-11"x 145-1" 72'-11"x 145'-1" LENGTH OF MULTI -DECK 56' 56' COOLER MILK DOORS 5 5 COOLER GENERAL DOORS 12 72 FREEZER ICE CREAM DOORS 6 6 FREEZER GENERAL DOORS 9 9 SPOT MERCHANDISERS 6 6 CART STORAGE (101)MODEL 563W {101)MODEL 563W L ® L L J 22'-I I /2" I PALLET JACK �- - I I I — �—� MIF WA 14 6,0" - --7--7 r- • -I} .Ai p .■. BREAK 1---H--k—±--I— I-11I'lll1I I iL111 ■ ROOM ini111n.��.T 1 � 1 � �1� �1 I (_—ra 1 BALER Ipl L_ �_�—� L_-_�—�—-:ice L— FLOOR DRAIN PALLET JACK STACKER FLOOR CHARGER SHELF SCRUBBER ROOF a` MANAGER I _ LADDER 'O ORGANIZATION II— 1 7- T 7- T T TDESKI � `a lIr 1 I I I I I �I I I I I `� CHUB + + 1 HUB+—+— (HUB +—+—+—HBACK (DRAIN I DRAIN (DRAIN itQQM 1� o J - rcQu TRASH CAN `-6"DIA. COVERED ST EL LOCKERS COAT ^CLOSET DREF. a DRINKING FOUNTAINS 18'-9 7/Eo 06,6 1/2' \ \ ELECTRIC SWITCHGEAR & BOLLARDS 0 R r- 1— I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _L _L _L _L _L J _L _L J REMOTE RECEIVER ' PROTOCOL UNIT McCUE GUARDRAIL - FREESTANDING SACKING COUNTER OFFICE O (38) MODEL 563W PIPE BOLLARD (TYP. OF 7) CART STORAGE FEETE IIIIIIIII� O OSCALE: 1/8"-1=0" 15 DOOR FREEZER Operations Plan ALDI FINDS HUB DRAIN L PRODUCE az • 17 DOOR COOLER (14 PLAN NORTH U r-T- 1 ` TOBT-T-7 1 1 1 1 DRAT 1 1 ALDI FINDS fl WATER & FIRE RISERS ROOF U LEADER HUB - DRAIN I.• 6'-0 CLEAR I MEAT COOLER tit NOTES: 1. THIS DRAWING IS FOR GENERAL FIXTURING LAYOUT AND REFERENCE TO EQUIPMENT ONLY. ALL INFORMATION IS FOR ALDI OPERATIONAL USE ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRCUTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS TO WALLS ARE TO FACE OF STUD. C D Revisions: Date: 1 2 3 4 Seal Seal PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DATE PROJECT LEAD DATE PROJECT DESIGNER DATE Copyright Ce.ruC Milir Met Drawing Alteration II Is a violotion of low for any person, unless acting under the direction of licensed Architect, Professional Engineer, landscape Architect, or Land Surveyor to alter any Item on this document In any way. Any licensee who oilers this document is required by law to a. his or her seal and to add the notation' Altered Sy' followed by his or her signature and the specific description of the alteration IDO NOT SCALE PLANS :apying, Printing, Software and other processes required to produce these prints can stretch or shrink the actual paper or layout. herefore, sealing of )(his drawing may be inaccurate. Contact APD ngmeering with any need for additional dimensions or clariflcafione APD Engineering & Architecture, PLLC 615 Fishers Run Victor, NY 14564 585.742/222 585.924.4914.fax www.apd.com 11j2 Kai 1111 Inc. 4201 Bagley Avenue North Faribault, MN 55021 IS�J 33 (50/I i9d)5tT ax ALDI Inc. Store #: XX ALDI Medina, MN 3522 Sioux Dr. Hamel, MN 55340 Hennepin County Project Name & Location: Operations Plan Drawing Name: Date: 03/06/15 Type: RHSD-V6 Project No. 14-0173A Drawn By: SRS A-131 Scale: As Noted Drawing No. KEY MATERIAL/MFG. EDGE METAL BY FIRESTONE MODULAR BRICK OMODULAR BRICK Pa STOREFRONT AS METAL WALL PANELS A6 METAL SOFFIT PANELS 47 EXTERIOR PAINT BY SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 8 NOT USED EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE COLOR/NO. Al - SLATE GRAY Al a - SILVER METALLIC FIELD COLOR - SEE SPEC ACCENT COLOR - SEE SPEC ANODIZED ALUM. SLATE GRAY SOLID PANELS - SEE SPEC PT-10 / CL-5 NOTES FIELD AND TRANSOM WINDOW SILLS - PILASTERS RE: DWG. A602 RE: DWG. A301-A304 RE: DWG. A603 A9 ALUMINUM COMPOSITE A9-BRIGHT SILVER PANEL A9a-SLATE GRAY PROVIDE PANEL JOINTS AS SHOWN - AT ALDI LOGO SIGN FIELD AND FOOD MARKET SIGN FIELD. PROVIDE ONE PIECE TIGHT FIT EXTRUDED MOLDING INSTALLATION SYSTEM WITH CENTER REVEAL TRIM BETWEEN PANELS AND J TRIM AT PANEL EDGES. AT CANOPY FASCIA, PROVIDE 'CLIP AND CAULK' INSTALLATION SYSTEM. A :.O SPLIT -FACE CMU SEE SPEC WATER TABLE FIELD A'I BLRD-2 PT-10 / CL-4 RE: DWG A603 A'2 BLRD-4 FACTORY FINISH - CHARCOAL RE: DWG A603 A'3 GUARD RAIL TYPE "A" PT-1 I / Cl-5 RE: DWG A3/A503, A603 A'4 GUARD RAIL TYPE"B" PT-11 / CL-5 RE: DWG A3/A503, A603 A' S CART RAIL 8 STARTER POST GALVANIZED A'b DOCK LEVELER/SEAL AND LEVELER -FACTORY FINISH/ SEAL AND BUMPERS BUMPERS -FACTORY FINISH BLACK PROVIDE BRICK BEHIND DOCK SEAL IN LIEU OF CAST STONE SILL 0 CONTROL JOINT MAX 30' OC RE: DWG. A504 A:e OVERFLOW SCUPPER PT-10 / CL-5 RE: DWG C3/A503 A':9 FOOD MARKET SIGNAGE BY SIGN VENDOR 14'-2 3/4'W. x 1 -6"h. ALDI TOWER SIGN BY SIGN VENDOR 7'-11 1 /8" w x 9 -5 1 /2" h. SEE DETAIL Dl /A504: VERIFY SIGN SIZE PRIOR TO FRAMING OPENING CRTB NATURAL RE: DWG A603-SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS CAST STONE SILL SEE SPEC WATER TABLE TRIM PREFABRICATED SUN SHADE SILVER POWDER COAT MANUFACTURED BY C. R. LAURENCE; RE: DWGS A306, A505 ROOF SCREENS SLATE GRAY SEE SPEC EI EXIT DISCHARGE LIGHT FACTORY FINISH MOUNT @ 8'-0" A.F.F. O WALL SCONCE FACTORY FINISH MOUNT @ 7'-6" A.F.F. E3 EXTERNAL SIREN FACTORY FINISH MOUNT @ 12'-0" A.F.F. O UTILITY METERING 8 C.T. FACTORY FINISH SEE ELECTRICAL DWGS OEXTERIOR WALL PACK FACTORY FINISH MOUNT @ IZ-0" A.F.F. OEXTOD RECEPTACLEERIR UPLEX FACTORY FINISH MOUNT @ 1'-6" A.F.F. OFIRE DEPT. CONNECTION FACTORY FINISH F2 MOTOR GONG OHOSE BIB %X STOREFRONT KEY SIGNAGE DESCRIPTION TOWER SIGN FOOD MARKET SIGN TOTAL SIGNAGE FACTORY FINISH FACTORY FINISH ANODIZED ALUMINUM QUANTITY SQ. FT. PER SIGN SEE FIRE PROTECTION DWGS SEE FIRE PROTECTION DWGS SEE PLUMBING DWGS RE: DWG A602 Please note that the colors shown here are a TOTALS graphical representation to show contrast in materials 149.8 only. Due to the nature of electronic media, colors may vary depending on computer or printer used. SIGNAGE IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND SHALL BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT SUBMITTAL For review of actual colors, a material sample board should be created on a project specific basis. APD ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE, PLLC 615 Fishers Run Victor, NY 14564 585.742.2222 585.924.4914.fax www.apd.com FIN"FLOC Side Elevation 24-6" A.F.F. .O. TOWER OUTRIGGER STUD 20'-6" A.F.F. .O. TOWER OUTRIGGER STUD 16,9 1 /2" A.F.F T.O. STUD 12'-0" A.F.F. B.O. PANELS 11' 0" A.F.F. T.O. CANOPY STEEL 0'-0" IN. FL G m m G TYP. G m m G 0 m uuwlwllsUV euuam16mail uiu • �iiinuwii7iuu�i�u.ui:w�uwyyu��y IIIII111II WIIIIIIIII 1111111111M11�11111111111 11 1®Illl11li1lllis_IIIIII{91111111111' ' 1111111P! DE'LKE -SEE CIVIL DWGS. TYP TYP. IG m O G e CO 7'-11 5/8" 0 m EIMEM OP =alk HAN _ Ee EO 1 Arbil FOOD MARKET ��O ALDI =_= A @BUILDINe=_ A @BUILDINeu^^_ WALL _ WALL CART - B2 6 CART B" k O WALL O WALL n ninnommonnitunn P11111111111111111•111111 in emeeememe Fro SCALE: 1 /8" = I'-0" -I1 5/8" SIGN OPNG m m e e m V1►-' �m� �, m o m me eme fY =iiYli A BUILDING wALL e CART WALL mem m m mm mm.® G G GRADE LINE - SEECMLUNGS. e m me a emmm ==========�=%%mom•. 11{1111111/111111111111111l11111hiiilll. I HI ALDI - MEDINA, MN EXTERIOR ELEVATION COPYRIGHT® 2a1 s TYP mem mm me mG m m t hill IIyIVIVIViVIWllls'1VIVIIIIIViIIWIViVIWIIdiIIIdIViViWIVIViVIVI� ���II 24'-6" A.F.F. T.O. TOWER OUTRIGGER STUD 20'-6"A.PF T.O. TOWER OUTRIGGER STUD ------1§ _§ _----_-----Z- GRADE LINE -SEE CIVIL DWG aaoo 1 fi-9 1 /2" A.F.F. T.O. STUD 12'-0" A.F.F. B.O. PANEL I I'-0" A.F.F .O. CANOPY STEEL Inc. 4201 Bagley Avenue North Faribault, MN 55021 (507) 333-9460 (507) 333-9475 fax .JTL \ i \ o\� I \ 0 r I TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. SS 46.711 977 — 20 7 -P YP.) -BED- — , — — — -98g. cb01°�/ /// �— ' _ a(\ ® \ l�CANT (TYP.) BED ,---- / . \\ 985 \ F///////////////////////////////////// 1/4 FYICTII►IC RIIII 111111f'_ 4 I VERSION 6.0 PROTOTY E T HAND ENTRY, MODIFIED DO ,539 SQ FT (INCLUDING CANO i � BUILDING SQ FT: 17,825 \ CANOPY SQ FT: 714 FFE = 981.25 / GREEK —REPLACE LARGE TREES-WLTH SHOWN- — —PLANT--1- I-GS N D�SHEDI soma num 975 _ 974 973- i UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UTILITIES ON -SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. xisting� xi�g ` - —M —— \ 44110i / -979 980- - -981— - - —982 — \ \ ,972 ISG Architecture Engineering Environmental Planning www.is-grp.com S GROUP 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 d ALDI I4 KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC. NO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC. NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I+S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA NO DATE MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-1 6408 FILE NAME 16408 LBASE-ALT DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 03/24/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET xi, stin� 1 — ! r \ \ / L1.11 TREE REMOVALS AND REQUIRED CALIPER INCHES THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED TABLE GENERAL NOTES: - LANDSCAPE WORK TO BE COMPLETED AFTER COMPLETION OF FINISH GRADING. FINISH GRADING BY OTHERS. - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL VISIT SITE BEFORE SUBMITTING A BID. THIS WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE FULL UNDERSTANDING OF SITE CONDITIONS. - IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLANT LIST OR NOTES AND THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE NUMBERS OR AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WILL BE CORRECT. - ALL PLANTS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. - ALL DECIDUOUS TREES MEASURED BY CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURED AT A POINT 6" UP FROM THE TRUNKS ROOT COLLAR. - ALL TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE SURROUNDED BY A MINIMUM 2 FOOT RADIUS BED WITH 3 INCH DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. - CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS WILL HAVE BEEN PLANTED IN THE CONTAINER FOR A MINIMUM OF SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION ON -SITE. - ALL PLANTS WILL BE GUARANTEED FOR FULL REPLACEMENT A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST ONE FULL YEAR (365 DAYS) AFTER INSTALLATION ON SITE. - IF THE CONTRACTOR FEELS THERE MAY BE AN ERROR, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. - PLANT SYMBOLS SHOWN ARE FOR LOCATING THE POSITIONS FOR PLANTING. SIZES SHOWN DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE TRUE PLANT SIZE EITHER AT TIME OF INSTALLATION OR WHEN FULL GROWN. - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO THE PROPERTY FROM INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.0 General: 1.01 Landscape work includes, but is not limited to, removal of weeds, top soil installation, soil preparation, installation of edging, installation of irrigation system, planting of trees, shrubs, and groundcover, final grading, installation of erosion control fabric, mulching, weed control, clean-up, and regular maintenance during construction and the establishment period. 1.02 No part of this work shall be performed or installed in any location or manner, which may endanger the health, safety, or welfare of the public now, or in the future. Construction means, methods, techniques, sequencing, etc., are the sole responsibility of the Contractor. 1.03 The Contractor agrees that he/she shall assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of this project, including safety of all persons and property; that this requirement shall apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours; and that the contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold the Owner and Landscape Architect harmless from any and all liability, real or alleged, in connection with the performance of work on this project, excepting for liability arising from the sole negligence of the Owner or Landscape Architect. 1.04 The Contractor shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, laws, and ordinances imposed by Authorities having Jurisdiction over this project site. 1.05 Contractor shall immediately give written notice to the Landscape Architect of conflict in any part of plans, notes, or specifications. Request clarification from I&S Group as appropriate. 1.06 Contractor shall field -verify existing conditions. 1.06.1 "Existing conditions" for the work as specified herein are based on the work described in the I&S Group drawings, and on the assumption that the work described in these drawings will be completed as described. 1.06.2 Immediately report discrepancies or variances between the existing conditions and the I&S Group drawings in writing to the owner's representative. If the Contractor begins work specified herein without the notification to I&S Group, the Contractor thereby acknowledges acceptance of the site "As -Is" and shall perform the work shown on the drawings and specified herein in accordance with the accepted base bid. 1.07 Prior to construction, the Contractor shall be responsible for locating all underground utilities. 1.07.1 Existing utility lines to be removed which may not be shown on construction drawings are presumed to be present within the Site. Contractor shall not proceed with such utility lines removal. Contractor shall contact I&S Group immediately upon discovery of an unidentified underground utility piping. I&S Group will then direct the Contractor as to the appropriate action to be taken. 1.08 Contractor shall avoid damage to utilities, structures, site appurtenances, etc., which occur as a result of the landscape construction. 1.09 The Landscape Contractor is responsible for verifying all quantities shown on these plans before pricing the work. Any difference in quantities shall be brought to the attention of I&S Group for clarification. 1.10 All substitutions shall be requested in writing and shall be approved by the I&S Group landscape architecture department, 507-387-6651. 1.11 If any areas which appear to need landscape installation, but are not PLANT LIST TOTAL STORE CREEK QTY QTY QTY KEY COMMON NAME / Latin name SIZE ROOT NOTE TREES 4 2 AE ACCOLADE ELM Ulmus 'Morton' 3" CAL. B.B. 9 3 CW SIOUXLAND COTTONWOOD Populus deltoides 3" CAL. B.B. 4 3 1 HB HACKBERRY Celtis occidentalis 3" CAL. B.B. 2 2 SK SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Skyline' 3" CAL. B.B. 2 2 SO SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 3" CAL. B.B. 4 4 CA COMPACT AUSTRIAN PINE Pinus nigra 'Compacta' 6' HT. B.B. 65 65 DPB DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo' 2" CAL B.B. columnar,exfoliating bark 36 36 FVB FOXVALLEY BIRCH (CLUMP) Betula nigra 'Little King' 8' HT B.B. multi -stem, dense slow growing, (equiv. 3" CAL) 8 8 MO BONNE! & MIKE SWAMP WHITE OAK Quarcus bicolor 'Bonnie & Mike' 2" CAL. B.B. smaller oak 59 59 SC SUGAR CONE MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Sugar Cone' 2" CAL. B.B. dwarf, dense, slow growing SHRUBS 6 6 ALC ALPINE CURRANT Ribes alpinum 24" HT. CONT. 22 22 DIN DIABOLO NINEBARK 24" HT. CONT. Physocarpus opulifolus 25 25 FDD FIREDANCE DOGWOOD Corpus sericea 'Bailadeline' 24 HT. CONT. compact form, red branches 30 30 GMS GOLDMOUND SPIREA Spiraea x bumalda 'goldmound' 16" HT. CONT. yellow foliage pink flowers 8 8 RPW RED PRINCE WEIGELA Weigela florida 'Red Prince' 24" HT. CONT. 33 33 RTD RED TWIGGED DOGWOOD Comus sericea 'baileyi' 24" HT. CONT. 10 10 RWV REDWING VIBURNUM Viburnum trilobum 'J.N. Select' 24" HT. CONT. dark foliage persistent red berries 15 15 JLC JAPANESE UPRIGHT YEW Taxus cuspidate 'Capitata' 24" HT. CONT. slow growing, pyramidal 22 22 SEJ SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' 18" HT. CONT. shown as landscaped on the plans, notify I&S Group landscape architecture department immediately. 1.12 All registered chemicals used on this project shall be handled and applied in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. 1.13 Clean-up the site at completion of this work, leave the site in an attractive condition. 1.14 Upon completion of installation the contractor shall issue a Certificate of Completion stating the project name and the following: "I, (state licensed contractor's name) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the installation of landscape and irrigation for the above project is complete and conforms with the city and owner approved plans and specifications, with the exception of the following deviations (list approved deviations, and who approved them)." The certificate shall be signed by the Contractor's license holder. 1.15 Prior to starting installation the contractor shall confirm that the construction set of plans are signed or stamped for approval by the city. Notify the landscape architect immediately if a city approval stamp or signature is not visible on the drawings. 2.0 Site and Soil Preparation: 2.01 The top 8 inches of soil shall be free of rocks, concrete, and foreign materials larger than 2 inches in diameter. Road base material shall not be present in the top 24 inches of soil. Any soil mixed with road base shall be removed and disposed of off -site. 2.02 Final grades shall be smooth and even, providing an attractive appearance. Concentrated flows of water shall not drain over walks. Contact landscape architect if this appears unavoidable. Landscape materials shall not block or interfere with the free flow of drainage water. 2.03 Planting areas shall slope at 2% minimum away from building foundations and footings. Positive drainage shall be provided in all planting areas. No standing water shall be permitted. A maximum grade difference of 1/2 inch shall be allowed between sidewalks or curbs and the finish surface in planters. 2.04 The planting soil mixture specified for planters shall be free of clay and is to be composed of topsoil and additional amendments and backfilled to a depth of 24". Amend the top 8 inches of topsoil in all planted areas with the following materials. Quantities are minimums per 1000 square feet. 2.04.1 [3] cubic yards of nitrolized compost. Compost shall have a 1/2 inch maximum particle size, a ph of 6.5 or higher, shall be cured for 60 days or more after composting, shall meet all EPA guidelines, and shall be weed and pathogen free. 2.04.2 [10] Ibs of agricultural gypsum. 2.04.3 [26] Ibs of 16-16-16 fertilizer. 2.05 All planting areas, including areas to be sodded, shall receive the following soil preparation prior to planting: a minimum of 8 inches of lightly compacted topsoil shall be installed over the subsoil if topsoil has been removed or is not present. If topsoil filters down into the subsoil, additional topsoil shall be applied until a stable 8 inch deep layer of topsoil is maintained. The top 8 inches of topsoil in the planters shall be machine -tilled to aerate the soil and alleviate any surface compaction. 2.06 The burden of proof of soil amendment installation rests with the Contractor. Soil tests may be required at the Contractor's expense in order to confirm amendment installation. 3.0 Planting: 3.01 Rough grading shall be completed prior to the start of planting in any given area of the project site. 3.03 Plants shall be well branched and bushy with good color, plant size should be in proportion to the pot as described by the American Standard for Nursery Stock. Plants delivered to the site that are yellow, sparse, burned, or barren will be rejected. Plant pots shall have soil to within 1 inch of the rim and the plants shall be fully rooted in the container. Plant material with cracked or broken root -balls shall be removed from the site. All plants shall be high quality with a securely attached id tag, have normal growth and should be free from disease, insects, or insect eggs. Plants shall conform with the minimum standards of ANSI z60 - the American Standard for Nursery Stock. Trees may not have been topped (upright branches at top of may not be cut or pruned). 3.04 Plants shall exceed the minimum size at planting requirements noted on the plans, regardless of the size of the container. No exceptions. Prepare bids based on the plant size, not the container size. A larger container size plant may be required to meet the plant size minimums. No cost adjustments will be allowed for use of larger container plants. Measurements shall be made with the plant in a natural, unsupported position. 3.05 Plants specified as "gallon," "container," or "box" on the plans shall conform to the ANSI z60, American Standard for Nursery Stock requirements for sizes with equivalent numbers (#1, #5, #15, #24, etc.,) as if specified as such on the plans. Thus a plant labeled as "5 gallon" size on the plans must be equivalent to a #5 container size plant as described in the American Standard for Nursery Stock. 3.06 Tree calipers shall be measured 6 inches above the rootball per ANSI z60, American Standard for Nursery Stock. Tree heights shall be measured from top of rootball to top of highest branch. 3.07 Trees shall be planted 4'0" or more from hardscapes, such as sidewalks, foundations, curbs, patios, etc. when possible. 3.08 Trees shall not be planted within 4'0" of buried utility lines, relocate trees slightly, if not possible notify landscape architect. 3.09 A vertical clearance of 114 inches is required above all disabled accessible parking spaces, a vertical clearance of 80 inches is required above all walkways. Trim trees to remove all limbs within these areas for ADA compliance. 3.10 Turf areas shall be sloped as required to provide positive drainage to the perimeter, or to drain inlets. Turf shall be installed flush with the top of surrounding curbs and walks so as to prevent water from puddling at the turf edges, import top soil if necessary to comply with this requirement. 3.11 All sod turf shall be rolled with a weighted roller after installation. 4.0 Mulch: 4.01 When rock mulch is indicated, install a 3" deep layer of 1"-2" dia. rock. 4.02 When rock mulch is indicated, place mulch onto a water permeable filter fabric. Such fabric shall be of substantial quality and include a manufacturer warranty of a minimum of 10 years. DBH inches REPLACED 6 9 3 130 108 16 118 SUM OF INCHES REPLACED 390 I SITE NOTES: IRRIGATION REQUIRED - ALL TREES, SODDED AREAS, AND PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE IRRIGATION DESIGN. PLANT BED EDGER - USE POLY EDGER PLANTING BEDS - SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 3" DEPTH HARDWOOD MULCH. DO NOT USE AN UNDERLAYMENT. NO PLASTIC OR FILTER FABRIC. SOD/SEED - REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND TYPE. mulch to a minimum depth of 3 inches. All mulched areas shall also incorporate a granular pre -emergent herbicide, such as Preen, to aid in weed abatement. No permeable filter fabric should be used unless called for on the plan. 5.0 Slopes: 5.01 See grading plans for slopes locations and gradients 5.02 Notify the landscape architect prior to starting work if any area on this site is found to have a slope exceeding 3:1. 7.0 Landscape Maintenance: 7.01 The Contractor shall maintain the landscape & irrigation throughout construction and up to opening date. 7.02 The Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining a regular watering schedule for all sodded areas for a minimum of 30 days after installation to ensure proper establishment. 7.03 The Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions required to protect plants throughout the maintenance period from abnormal temperatures. 8.0 Observations: 8.01 The Contractor shall request a final observation by the owner's representative upon completion of installation. 8.02 Observation must be requested 7 days in advance of the anticipated date of the observation. 8.03 Prior to requesting the final observation it is the contractor's responsibility to assure that the work is finished and complies with all clearly stated requirements of the plans, including plant sizes and quantities. Substantial non-compliance will result in the assessment of penalties against the Contractor, to be not less than the cost of the observation. Any of the following shall be considered proof of substantial non-compliance: 8.03.1 Installed quantity of any item is less than 95% of that specified. 8.03.2 More than 3% of any plant variety are undersize. 8.03.3 More than 3% of any plant variety are dead or dying. Dying is defined as wilting or loss of more than 30% of leaves (deciduous leaf drop excepted.) 9.0 Guarantee: 9.01 The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee all landscape work for a period of time, beginning at the start of the maintenance period, as follows: 9.01.1 Trees - one year. 9.01.2 Shrubs, lawn and groundcover - one year. 9.01.3 Irrigation system - one year. 9.02 Theft, vandalism, and death due to acts of God are excluded from this warranty. EDGER FINAL GRADE Tree Number Species DBH inches Condition healthy tree units DBH in. total removed DBH in. -9 units no replace DBH in. need to replace 1 Green Ash 12 Healthy 1 12 2 Green Ash 13 Healthy 2 13 3 Green Ash 9 Healthy 3 9 4 Green Ash 9 Healthy 4 9 5 Boxelder 9 Healthy 5 9 6 Green Ash 12 Healthy 6 12 12 13 9 9 9 12 7 Boxelder 16 Healthy 7 16 16 8 Boxelder 12 Healthy 8 12 9 Boxelder 9 Healthy 9 9 10 Boxelder 8 Dead 11 Boxelder 14 Healthy 10 14 12 Boxelder 8 Healthy 11 8 13 Boxelder 9 Healthy 12 9 14 Boxelder 9 Healthy 13 9 15 Boxelder 11 Healthy 14 11 16 Boxelder 12 Healthy 15 12 12 9 14 8 9 9 11 12 17 Boxelder 17 Healthy 16 17 17 18 Boxelder 10 Healthy 17 10 10 19 Boxelder 27 Healthy 18 27 27 20 Boxelder 10 Healthy 19 10 21 Boxelder 10 Healthy 20 10 22 Boxelder 15 Healthy 21 15 23 Boxelder 12 Healthy 22 12 24 Boxelder 11 Healthy 23 11 25 Boxelder 12 Healthy 24 12 26 Boxelder 8 Healthy 25 8 27 American Elm 9 Dead 28 American Elm 12 Dead 29 Red Cedar 9 Healthy 26 9 30 Boxelder 9 Healthy 27 9 31 Eastern Cottonwood 4 Healthy 28 32 Boxelder 10 Healthy 29 33 Boxelder 9 Healthy 30 34 Boxelder 10 Healthy 31 35 Green Ash 9 Healthy 32 36 Eastern Cottonwood 9 Healthy 33 37 Green Ash 8 Healthy 34 38 Eastern Cottonwood 9 Healthy 35 39 Eastern Cottonwood 16 Healthy 36 40 Green Ash 10 Healthy 37 41 Eastern Cottonwood 18 Healthy 38 42 Eastern Cottonwood 12 Healthy 39 43 Boxelder 12 Healthy 40 12 44 Boxelder 14 Healthy 41 14 10 10 15 12 11 12 8 9 9 12 14 45 American Elm 25 Healthy 42 25 25 46 Boxelder 13 Healthy 43 13 47 American Elm 9 Healthy 44 9 48 American Elm 9 Healthy 45 9 49 American Elm 16 Healthy 46 16 13 9 9 16 50 Boxelder 21 Healthy 47 21 21 51 American Elm 21 Healthy 48 21 21 52 Boxelder 10 Healthy 49 10 10 53 Green Ash 18 Healthy 50 18 18 54 Boxelder 10 Healthy 51 10 55 Colorado Blue Spruce 10 Healthy 52 10 10 10 56 Boxelder 19 Healthy 53 19 19 57 Boxelder 10 Healthy 54 10 58 Boxelder 13 Healthy 55 13 59 American Elm 4 Dead 60 Boxelder 10 Healthy 56 10 10 13 10 61 Eastern Cottonwood 17 Healthy 57 17 17 57 trees healthy 15% x 57 = 8.55 or 9 units (per code, 15% of tree units need not be replaced) 2' MIN. TO PAVED SURFACE MULCH AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN OVER PRE-ENERGENT WEED CONTROL GRANULES SIDEWALK/CURB 4aiiii �IT_I- :HE -1 ���44������ III-1 -1 l l � ���ee����` I-III=III- III=III-11 � 1=III-�T-ri i = =-m- - i- _ _� I -III I MIN. 6" (TYP.) -ITI-111 11 I- I I I -I I I -I 11=11. ETE1 11=1 11=1 11-11 I UNDISTURBED -I I1- , I I-111-111-111=_1' 1-1I1 1I1 1I1 1I1 1I1-' SOIL -III--'' - BACKFILL WITH PLANTING MIX. 6" AT SIDES AND ALL SPACE BETWEEN PLANTS TO FULL DEPTH. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL DO NOT STAKE THROUGH ROOT BALL FINISHED GRADE '_11 1 Im UNDISTURBED SOIL -I I I -I I I- I-111111 Attetatta .14 IF AN EVERGREEN: - NEVER CUT LEADER - PRUNE ONLY TO REMOVE DAMAGED BRANCHES STAKING IS DISCOURAGED, HOWEVER, IF NEEDED, USE 2" WIDE WEBBING STRAPS WITH HEAVY GAUGE WIRE. WIRE SHOULD STICK STRAIGHT OUT AS SHOWN, BUT NOT TIGHT. REMOVE AFTER ONE YEAR. ROOT COLLAR SHALL BE SET 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 3" DEEP HARD WOOD MULCH. OVER PRE -EMERGENT WEED CONTROL GRANULES. KEEP MULCH 6" BACK FROM TRUNK. BACKFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL. I= wATER THOROUGHLY TO E- ELIMINATE AIR. DO NOT TAMP. SET ROOT BALL FLAT ON -I 1 I UNDISTURBED SOIL. REMOVE OR 1' CUT TOP AND FOLD DOWN WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP. REMOVE ALL POLY TIES. 390 ISG I+S GROUP 4201 Bagley Ave. N Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC. NO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC. NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I+S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 LBASE-ALT DRAWN BY CWT DESIGNED BY CWT REVIEWED BY CWT ISSUE DATE 03/24/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. LANDSCAPE NOTES & PLANT LIST 4.03 When wood mulch is indicated, install premium shredded hardwood TREE PLANTING DETAIL 0 G 20 Scale: 40 60 \ \ Tree Number Species D13H inches Condition 1 Green Ash 12 Healthy 2 Green Ash 13 Healthy 3 Green Ash 9 Healthy 4 Green Ash 9 Healthy 5 Boxelder 9 Healthy 6 Green Ash 12 Healthy 7 Boxelder 16 Healthy 8 Boxelder 12 Healthy 9 Boxelder 9 Healthy 10 Boxelder 8 Dead 11 Boxelder 14 Healthy 12 Boxelder 8 Healthy 13 Boxelder 9 Healthy 14 Boxelder 9 Healthy 15 Boxelder 11 Healthy 16 Boxelder 12 Healthy 17 Boxelder 17 Healthy 18 Boxelder 10 Healthy 19 Boxelder 27 Healthy 20 Boxelder 10 Healthy 21 Boxelder 10 Healthy 22 Boxelder 15 Healthy 23 Boxelder 12 Healthy 24 Boxelder 11 Healthy 25 Boxelder 12 Healthy 26 Boxelder 8 Healthy 27 American Elm 9 Dead 28 American Elm 12 Dead 29 Red Cedar 9 Healthy 30 Boxelder 9 Healthy 31 Eastern Cottonwood 4 Healthy 32 Boxelder 10 Healthy 33 Boxelder 9 Healthy 34 Boxelder 10 Healthy 35 Green Ash 9 Healthy 36 Eastern Cottonwood 9 Healthy 37 Green Ash 8 Healthy 38 Eastern Cottonwood 9 Healthy 39 Eastern Cottonwood 16 Healthy 40 Green Ash 10 Healthy 41 Eastern Cottonwood 18 Healthy 42 Eastern Cottonwood 12 Healthy 43 Boxelder 12 Healthy 44 Boxelder 14 Healthy 45 American Elm 25 Healthy 46 Boxelder 13 Healthy 47 American Elm 9 Healthy 48 American Elm 9 Healthy 49 American Elm 16 Healthy 50 Boxelder 21 Healthy 51 American Elm 21 Healthy 52 Boxelder 10 Healthy 53 Green Ash 18 Healthy 54 Boxelder 10 Healthy 55 Colorado Blue Spruce 10 Healthy 56 Boxelder 19 Healthy 57 Boxelder 10 Healthy 58 Boxelder 13 Healthy 59 American Elm 4 Dead 60 Boxelder 10 Healthy 61 Eastern Cottonwood 17 Healthy I 0 r i 55 G \ CBGL _-978.03 1=972.88 \ S \ �r — — G — — \ ,✓ \ \ \ c2>3 \ • \ \ \ \ / •\", I INPLACE TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. —960 --- < 977 970- _< -975— CLEAR & GRUB INPLACE TREE 978 983- 979 t/ / OHL — i <: i goo I I I I I I I I --- < 982 - / — — OHL — — — OHL OHL 97 ELM CREEK W-----w —965— 5 g74 \ 973_ \ 972— -- —< -977�\ %////////////////////////////////////////, EXISTING BUILDING / z \ 985 i i -971 W j 21 — 24 __-- _,-25 -----__ -27 \--____ A \ �` �� �� \ \ �\ \ \/ , ,� -. I I ��� _ OH\ — GHL — _ \ \ V V� \ � N \N\\\A 060\ \ �\ \ \ A\ \\:\ \\\ \ \I\ C EAR & GRUB *56 984 41 N..47:\•_4*t\tp..‘ \\4\--—\\\\ \ ISG I+S GROUP 4201 Bagley Ave. N Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC. NO 47078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC. NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 TREE REMOVAL ALT DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 03/24/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. TREE REMOVAL PLAN .JTL \ i \ o\� I \ 0 r I TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. SS 46.711 977 — 20 7 -P YP.) -BED- — , — — — -98g. cb01°�/ /// �— ' _ a(\ ® \ l�CANT (TYP.) BED ,---- / . \\ 985 \ F///////////////////////////////////// 1/4 FYICTII►IC RIIII 111111f'_ 4 I VERSION 6.0 PROTOTY E T HAND ENTRY, MODIFIED DO ,539 SQ FT (INCLUDING CANO i � BUILDING SQ FT: 17,825 \ CANOPY SQ FT: 714 FFE = 981.25 / GREEK —REPLACE LARGE TREES-WLTH SHOWN- — —PLANT--1- I-GS N D�SHEDI soma num 975 _ 974 973- i UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UTILITIES ON -SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. xisting� xi�g ` - —M —— \ 44110i / -979 980- - -981— - - —982 — \ \ ,972 ISG Architecture Engineering Environmental Planning www.is-grp.com S GROUP 4201 Bagley Ave. N Faribault, MN 55021 Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 d ALDI I4 KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC. NO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC. NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I+S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY MEDINA NO DATE MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-1 6408 FILE NAME 16408 LBASE-ALT DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 03/24/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET xi, stin� 1 — ! r \ \ / L1.11 TREE REMOVALS AND REQUIRED CALIPER INCHES THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED TABLE GENERAL NOTES: - LANDSCAPE WORK TO BE COMPLETED AFTER COMPLETION OF FINISH GRADING. FINISH GRADING BY OTHERS. - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL VISIT SITE BEFORE SUBMITTING A BID. THIS WILL ALLOW FOR A MORE FULL UNDERSTANDING OF SITE CONDITIONS. - IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLANT LIST OR NOTES AND THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE NUMBERS OR AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WILL BE CORRECT. - ALL PLANTS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. - ALL DECIDUOUS TREES MEASURED BY CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURED AT A POINT 6" UP FROM THE TRUNKS ROOT COLLAR. - ALL TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE SURROUNDED BY A MINIMUM 2 FOOT RADIUS BED WITH 3 INCH DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. - CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS WILL HAVE BEEN PLANTED IN THE CONTAINER FOR A MINIMUM OF SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION ON -SITE. - ALL PLANTS WILL BE GUARANTEED FOR FULL REPLACEMENT A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST ONE FULL YEAR (365 DAYS) AFTER INSTALLATION ON SITE. - IF THE CONTRACTOR FEELS THERE MAY BE AN ERROR, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. - PLANT SYMBOLS SHOWN ARE FOR LOCATING THE POSITIONS FOR PLANTING. SIZES SHOWN DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE TRUE PLANT SIZE EITHER AT TIME OF INSTALLATION OR WHEN FULL GROWN. - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO THE PROPERTY FROM INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1.0 General: 1.01 Landscape work includes, but is not limited to, removal of weeds, top soil installation, soil preparation, installation of edging, installation of irrigation system, planting of trees, shrubs, and groundcover, final grading, installation of erosion control fabric, mulching, weed control, clean-up, and regular maintenance during construction and the establishment period. 1.02 No part of this work shall be performed or installed in any location or manner, which may endanger the health, safety, or welfare of the public now, or in the future. Construction means, methods, techniques, sequencing, etc., are the sole responsibility of the Contractor. 1.03 The Contractor agrees that he/she shall assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of this project, including safety of all persons and property; that this requirement shall apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours; and that the contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold the Owner and Landscape Architect harmless from any and all liability, real or alleged, in connection with the performance of work on this project, excepting for liability arising from the sole negligence of the Owner or Landscape Architect. 1.04 The Contractor shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, laws, and ordinances imposed by Authorities having Jurisdiction over this project site. 1.05 Contractor shall immediately give written notice to the Landscape Architect of conflict in any part of plans, notes, or specifications. Request clarification from I&S Group as appropriate. 1.06 Contractor shall field -verify existing conditions. 1.06.1 "Existing conditions" for the work as specified herein are based on the work described in the I&S Group drawings, and on the assumption that the work described in these drawings will be completed as described. 1.06.2 Immediately report discrepancies or variances between the existing conditions and the I&S Group drawings in writing to the owner's representative. If the Contractor begins work specified herein without the notification to I&S Group, the Contractor thereby acknowledges acceptance of the site "As -Is" and shall perform the work shown on the drawings and specified herein in accordance with the accepted base bid. 1.07 Prior to construction, the Contractor shall be responsible for locating all underground utilities. 1.07.1 Existing utility lines to be removed which may not be shown on construction drawings are presumed to be present within the Site. Contractor shall not proceed with such utility lines removal. Contractor shall contact I&S Group immediately upon discovery of an unidentified underground utility piping. I&S Group will then direct the Contractor as to the appropriate action to be taken. 1.08 Contractor shall avoid damage to utilities, structures, site appurtenances, etc., which occur as a result of the landscape construction. 1.09 The Landscape Contractor is responsible for verifying all quantities shown on these plans before pricing the work. Any difference in quantities shall be brought to the attention of I&S Group for clarification. 1.10 All substitutions shall be requested in writing and shall be approved by the I&S Group landscape architecture department, 507-387-6651. 1.11 If any areas which appear to need landscape installation, but are not PLANT LIST TOTAL STORE CREEK QTY QTY QTY KEY COMMON NAME / Latin name SIZE ROOT NOTE TREES 4 2 AE ACCOLADE ELM Ulmus 'Morton' 3" CAL. B.B. 9 3 CW SIOUXLAND COTTONWOOD Populus deltoides 3" CAL. B.B. 4 3 1 HB HACKBERRY Celtis occidentalis 3" CAL. B.B. 2 2 SK SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Skyline' 3" CAL. B.B. 2 2 SO SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 3" CAL. B.B. 4 4 CA COMPACT AUSTRIAN PINE Pinus nigra 'Compacta' 6' HT. B.B. 65 65 DPB DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo' 2" CAL B.B. columnar,exfoliating bark 36 36 FVB FOXVALLEY BIRCH (CLUMP) Betula nigra 'Little King' 8' HT B.B. multi -stem, dense slow growing, (equiv. 3" CAL) 8 8 MO BONNE! & MIKE SWAMP WHITE OAK Quarcus bicolor 'Bonnie & Mike' 2" CAL. B.B. smaller oak 59 59 SC SUGAR CONE MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Sugar Cone' 2" CAL. B.B. dwarf, dense, slow growing SHRUBS 6 6 ALC ALPINE CURRANT Ribes alpinum 24" HT. CONT. 22 22 DIN DIABOLO NINEBARK 24" HT. CONT. Physocarpus opulifolus 25 25 FDD FIREDANCE DOGWOOD Corpus sericea 'Bailadeline' 24 HT. CONT. compact form, red branches 30 30 GMS GOLDMOUND SPIREA Spiraea x bumalda 'goldmound' 16" HT. CONT. yellow foliage pink flowers 8 8 RPW RED PRINCE WEIGELA Weigela florida 'Red Prince' 24" HT. CONT. 33 33 RTD RED TWIGGED DOGWOOD Comus sericea 'baileyi' 24" HT. CONT. 10 10 RWV REDWING VIBURNUM Viburnum trilobum 'J.N. Select' 24" HT. CONT. dark foliage persistent red berries 15 15 JLC JAPANESE UPRIGHT YEW Taxus cuspidate 'Capitata' 24" HT. CONT. slow growing, pyramidal 22 22 SEJ SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' 18" HT. CONT. shown as landscaped on the plans, notify I&S Group landscape architecture department immediately. 1.12 All registered chemicals used on this project shall be handled and applied in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. 1.13 Clean-up the site at completion of this work, leave the site in an attractive condition. 1.14 Upon completion of installation the contractor shall issue a Certificate of Completion stating the project name and the following: "I, (state licensed contractor's name) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the installation of landscape and irrigation for the above project is complete and conforms with the city and owner approved plans and specifications, with the exception of the following deviations (list approved deviations, and who approved them)." The certificate shall be signed by the Contractor's license holder. 1.15 Prior to starting installation the contractor shall confirm that the construction set of plans are signed or stamped for approval by the city. Notify the landscape architect immediately if a city approval stamp or signature is not visible on the drawings. 2.0 Site and Soil Preparation: 2.01 The top 8 inches of soil shall be free of rocks, concrete, and foreign materials larger than 2 inches in diameter. Road base material shall not be present in the top 24 inches of soil. Any soil mixed with road base shall be removed and disposed of off -site. 2.02 Final grades shall be smooth and even, providing an attractive appearance. Concentrated flows of water shall not drain over walks. Contact landscape architect if this appears unavoidable. Landscape materials shall not block or interfere with the free flow of drainage water. 2.03 Planting areas shall slope at 2% minimum away from building foundations and footings. Positive drainage shall be provided in all planting areas. No standing water shall be permitted. A maximum grade difference of 1/2 inch shall be allowed between sidewalks or curbs and the finish surface in planters. 2.04 The planting soil mixture specified for planters shall be free of clay and is to be composed of topsoil and additional amendments and backfilled to a depth of 24". Amend the top 8 inches of topsoil in all planted areas with the following materials. Quantities are minimums per 1000 square feet. 2.04.1 [3] cubic yards of nitrolized compost. Compost shall have a 1/2 inch maximum particle size, a ph of 6.5 or higher, shall be cured for 60 days or more after composting, shall meet all EPA guidelines, and shall be weed and pathogen free. 2.04.2 [10] Ibs of agricultural gypsum. 2.04.3 [26] Ibs of 16-16-16 fertilizer. 2.05 All planting areas, including areas to be sodded, shall receive the following soil preparation prior to planting: a minimum of 8 inches of lightly compacted topsoil shall be installed over the subsoil if topsoil has been removed or is not present. If topsoil filters down into the subsoil, additional topsoil shall be applied until a stable 8 inch deep layer of topsoil is maintained. The top 8 inches of topsoil in the planters shall be machine -tilled to aerate the soil and alleviate any surface compaction. 2.06 The burden of proof of soil amendment installation rests with the Contractor. Soil tests may be required at the Contractor's expense in order to confirm amendment installation. 3.0 Planting: 3.01 Rough grading shall be completed prior to the start of planting in any given area of the project site. 3.03 Plants shall be well branched and bushy with good color, plant size should be in proportion to the pot as described by the American Standard for Nursery Stock. Plants delivered to the site that are yellow, sparse, burned, or barren will be rejected. Plant pots shall have soil to within 1 inch of the rim and the plants shall be fully rooted in the container. Plant material with cracked or broken root -balls shall be removed from the site. All plants shall be high quality with a securely attached id tag, have normal growth and should be free from disease, insects, or insect eggs. Plants shall conform with the minimum standards of ANSI z60 - the American Standard for Nursery Stock. Trees may not have been topped (upright branches at top of may not be cut or pruned). 3.04 Plants shall exceed the minimum size at planting requirements noted on the plans, regardless of the size of the container. No exceptions. Prepare bids based on the plant size, not the container size. A larger container size plant may be required to meet the plant size minimums. No cost adjustments will be allowed for use of larger container plants. Measurements shall be made with the plant in a natural, unsupported position. 3.05 Plants specified as "gallon," "container," or "box" on the plans shall conform to the ANSI z60, American Standard for Nursery Stock requirements for sizes with equivalent numbers (#1, #5, #15, #24, etc.,) as if specified as such on the plans. Thus a plant labeled as "5 gallon" size on the plans must be equivalent to a #5 container size plant as described in the American Standard for Nursery Stock. 3.06 Tree calipers shall be measured 6 inches above the rootball per ANSI z60, American Standard for Nursery Stock. Tree heights shall be measured from top of rootball to top of highest branch. 3.07 Trees shall be planted 4'0" or more from hardscapes, such as sidewalks, foundations, curbs, patios, etc. when possible. 3.08 Trees shall not be planted within 4'0" of buried utility lines, relocate trees slightly, if not possible notify landscape architect. 3.09 A vertical clearance of 114 inches is required above all disabled accessible parking spaces, a vertical clearance of 80 inches is required above all walkways. Trim trees to remove all limbs within these areas for ADA compliance. 3.10 Turf areas shall be sloped as required to provide positive drainage to the perimeter, or to drain inlets. Turf shall be installed flush with the top of surrounding curbs and walks so as to prevent water from puddling at the turf edges, import top soil if necessary to comply with this requirement. 3.11 All sod turf shall be rolled with a weighted roller after installation. 4.0 Mulch: 4.01 When rock mulch is indicated, install a 3" deep layer of 1"-2" dia. rock. 4.02 When rock mulch is indicated, place mulch onto a water permeable filter fabric. Such fabric shall be of substantial quality and include a manufacturer warranty of a minimum of 10 years. DBH inches REPLACED 6 9 3 130 108 16 118 SUM OF INCHES REPLACED 390 I SITE NOTES: IRRIGATION REQUIRED - ALL TREES, SODDED AREAS, AND PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE IRRIGATION DESIGN. PLANT BED EDGER - USE POLY EDGER PLANTING BEDS - SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 3" DEPTH HARDWOOD MULCH. DO NOT USE AN UNDERLAYMENT. NO PLASTIC OR FILTER FABRIC. SOD/SEED - REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND TYPE. mulch to a minimum depth of 3 inches. All mulched areas shall also incorporate a granular pre -emergent herbicide, such as Preen, to aid in weed abatement. No permeable filter fabric should be used unless called for on the plan. 5.0 Slopes: 5.01 See grading plans for slopes locations and gradients 5.02 Notify the landscape architect prior to starting work if any area on this site is found to have a slope exceeding 3:1. 7.0 Landscape Maintenance: 7.01 The Contractor shall maintain the landscape & irrigation throughout construction and up to opening date. 7.02 The Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining a regular watering schedule for all sodded areas for a minimum of 30 days after installation to ensure proper establishment. 7.03 The Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions required to protect plants throughout the maintenance period from abnormal temperatures. 8.0 Observations: 8.01 The Contractor shall request a final observation by the owner's representative upon completion of installation. 8.02 Observation must be requested 7 days in advance of the anticipated date of the observation. 8.03 Prior to requesting the final observation it is the contractor's responsibility to assure that the work is finished and complies with all clearly stated requirements of the plans, including plant sizes and quantities. Substantial non-compliance will result in the assessment of penalties against the Contractor, to be not less than the cost of the observation. Any of the following shall be considered proof of substantial non-compliance: 8.03.1 Installed quantity of any item is less than 95% of that specified. 8.03.2 More than 3% of any plant variety are undersize. 8.03.3 More than 3% of any plant variety are dead or dying. Dying is defined as wilting or loss of more than 30% of leaves (deciduous leaf drop excepted.) 9.0 Guarantee: 9.01 The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee all landscape work for a period of time, beginning at the start of the maintenance period, as follows: 9.01.1 Trees - one year. 9.01.2 Shrubs, lawn and groundcover - one year. 9.01.3 Irrigation system - one year. 9.02 Theft, vandalism, and death due to acts of God are excluded from this warranty. EDGER FINAL GRADE Tree Number Species DBH inches Condition healthy tree units DBH in. total removed DBH in. -9 units no replace DBH in. need to replace 1 Green Ash 12 Healthy 1 12 2 Green Ash 13 Healthy 2 13 3 Green Ash 9 Healthy 3 9 4 Green Ash 9 Healthy 4 9 5 Boxelder 9 Healthy 5 9 6 Green Ash 12 Healthy 6 12 12 13 9 9 9 12 7 Boxelder 16 Healthy 7 16 16 8 Boxelder 12 Healthy 8 12 9 Boxelder 9 Healthy 9 9 10 Boxelder 8 Dead 11 Boxelder 14 Healthy 10 14 12 Boxelder 8 Healthy 11 8 13 Boxelder 9 Healthy 12 9 14 Boxelder 9 Healthy 13 9 15 Boxelder 11 Healthy 14 11 16 Boxelder 12 Healthy 15 12 12 9 14 8 9 9 11 12 17 Boxelder 17 Healthy 16 17 17 18 Boxelder 10 Healthy 17 10 10 19 Boxelder 27 Healthy 18 27 27 20 Boxelder 10 Healthy 19 10 21 Boxelder 10 Healthy 20 10 22 Boxelder 15 Healthy 21 15 23 Boxelder 12 Healthy 22 12 24 Boxelder 11 Healthy 23 11 25 Boxelder 12 Healthy 24 12 26 Boxelder 8 Healthy 25 8 27 American Elm 9 Dead 28 American Elm 12 Dead 29 Red Cedar 9 Healthy 26 9 30 Boxelder 9 Healthy 27 9 31 Eastern Cottonwood 4 Healthy 28 32 Boxelder 10 Healthy 29 33 Boxelder 9 Healthy 30 34 Boxelder 10 Healthy 31 35 Green Ash 9 Healthy 32 36 Eastern Cottonwood 9 Healthy 33 37 Green Ash 8 Healthy 34 38 Eastern Cottonwood 9 Healthy 35 39 Eastern Cottonwood 16 Healthy 36 40 Green Ash 10 Healthy 37 41 Eastern Cottonwood 18 Healthy 38 42 Eastern Cottonwood 12 Healthy 39 43 Boxelder 12 Healthy 40 12 44 Boxelder 14 Healthy 41 14 10 10 15 12 11 12 8 9 9 12 14 45 American Elm 25 Healthy 42 25 25 46 Boxelder 13 Healthy 43 13 47 American Elm 9 Healthy 44 9 48 American Elm 9 Healthy 45 9 49 American Elm 16 Healthy 46 16 13 9 9 16 50 Boxelder 21 Healthy 47 21 21 51 American Elm 21 Healthy 48 21 21 52 Boxelder 10 Healthy 49 10 10 53 Green Ash 18 Healthy 50 18 18 54 Boxelder 10 Healthy 51 10 55 Colorado Blue Spruce 10 Healthy 52 10 10 10 56 Boxelder 19 Healthy 53 19 19 57 Boxelder 10 Healthy 54 10 58 Boxelder 13 Healthy 55 13 59 American Elm 4 Dead 60 Boxelder 10 Healthy 56 10 10 13 10 61 Eastern Cottonwood 17 Healthy 57 17 17 57 trees healthy 15% x 57 = 8.55 or 9 units (per code, 15% of tree units need not be replaced) 2' MIN. TO PAVED SURFACE MULCH AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN OVER PRE-ENERGENT WEED CONTROL GRANULES SIDEWALK/CURB 4aiiii �IT_I- :HE -1 ���44������ III-1 -1 l l � ���ee����` I-III=III- III=III-11 � 1=III-�T-ri i = =-m- - i- _ _� I -III I MIN. 6" (TYP.) -ITI-111 11 I- I I I -I I I -I 11=11. ETE1 11=1 11=1 11-11 I UNDISTURBED -I I1- , I I-111-111-111=_1' 1-1I1 1I1 1I1 1I1 1I1-' SOIL -III--'' - BACKFILL WITH PLANTING MIX. 6" AT SIDES AND ALL SPACE BETWEEN PLANTS TO FULL DEPTH. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL DO NOT STAKE THROUGH ROOT BALL FINISHED GRADE '_11 1 Im UNDISTURBED SOIL -I I I -I I I- I-111111 Attetatta .14 IF AN EVERGREEN: - NEVER CUT LEADER - PRUNE ONLY TO REMOVE DAMAGED BRANCHES STAKING IS DISCOURAGED, HOWEVER, IF NEEDED, USE 2" WIDE WEBBING STRAPS WITH HEAVY GAUGE WIRE. WIRE SHOULD STICK STRAIGHT OUT AS SHOWN, BUT NOT TIGHT. REMOVE AFTER ONE YEAR. ROOT COLLAR SHALL BE SET 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 3" DEEP HARD WOOD MULCH. OVER PRE -EMERGENT WEED CONTROL GRANULES. KEEP MULCH 6" BACK FROM TRUNK. BACKFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL. I= wATER THOROUGHLY TO E- ELIMINATE AIR. DO NOT TAMP. SET ROOT BALL FLAT ON -I 1 I UNDISTURBED SOIL. REMOVE OR 1' CUT TOP AND FOLD DOWN WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP. REMOVE ALL POLY TIES. 390 ISG I+S GROUP 4201 Bagley Ave. N Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC. NO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC. NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I+S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 LBASE-ALT DRAWN BY CWT DESIGNED BY CWT REVIEWED BY CWT ISSUE DATE 03/24/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. LANDSCAPE NOTES & PLANT LIST 4.03 When wood mulch is indicated, install premium shredded hardwood TREE PLANTING DETAIL 0 G 20 Scale: 40 60 \ \ Tree Number Species D13H inches Condition 1 Green Ash 12 Healthy 2 Green Ash 13 Healthy 3 Green Ash 9 Healthy 4 Green Ash 9 Healthy 5 Boxelder 9 Healthy 6 Green Ash 12 Healthy 7 Boxelder 16 Healthy 8 Boxelder 12 Healthy 9 Boxelder 9 Healthy 10 Boxelder 8 Dead 11 Boxelder 14 Healthy 12 Boxelder 8 Healthy 13 Boxelder 9 Healthy 14 Boxelder 9 Healthy 15 Boxelder 11 Healthy 16 Boxelder 12 Healthy 17 Boxelder 17 Healthy 18 Boxelder 10 Healthy 19 Boxelder 27 Healthy 20 Boxelder 10 Healthy 21 Boxelder 10 Healthy 22 Boxelder 15 Healthy 23 Boxelder 12 Healthy 24 Boxelder 11 Healthy 25 Boxelder 12 Healthy 26 Boxelder 8 Healthy 27 American Elm 9 Dead 28 American Elm 12 Dead 29 Red Cedar 9 Healthy 30 Boxelder 9 Healthy 31 Eastern Cottonwood 4 Healthy 32 Boxelder 10 Healthy 33 Boxelder 9 Healthy 34 Boxelder 10 Healthy 35 Green Ash 9 Healthy 36 Eastern Cottonwood 9 Healthy 37 Green Ash 8 Healthy 38 Eastern Cottonwood 9 Healthy 39 Eastern Cottonwood 16 Healthy 40 Green Ash 10 Healthy 41 Eastern Cottonwood 18 Healthy 42 Eastern Cottonwood 12 Healthy 43 Boxelder 12 Healthy 44 Boxelder 14 Healthy 45 American Elm 25 Healthy 46 Boxelder 13 Healthy 47 American Elm 9 Healthy 48 American Elm 9 Healthy 49 American Elm 16 Healthy 50 Boxelder 21 Healthy 51 American Elm 21 Healthy 52 Boxelder 10 Healthy 53 Green Ash 18 Healthy 54 Boxelder 10 Healthy 55 Colorado Blue Spruce 10 Healthy 56 Boxelder 19 Healthy 57 Boxelder 10 Healthy 58 Boxelder 13 Healthy 59 American Elm 4 Dead 60 Boxelder 10 Healthy 61 Eastern Cottonwood 17 Healthy I 0 r i 55 G \ CBGL _-978.03 1=972.88 \ S \ �r — — G — — \ ,✓ \ \ \ c2>3 \ • \ \ \ \ / •\", I INPLACE TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. —960 --- < 977 970- _< -975— CLEAR & GRUB INPLACE TREE 978 983- 979 t/ / OHL — i <: i goo I I I I I I I I --- < 982 - / — — OHL — — — OHL OHL 97 ELM CREEK W-----w —965— 5 g74 \ 973_ \ 972— -- —< -977�\ %////////////////////////////////////////, EXISTING BUILDING / z \ 985 i i -971 W j 21 — 24 __-- _,-25 -----__ -27 \--____ A \ �` �� �� \ \ �\ \ \/ , ,� -. I I ��� _ OH\ — GHL — _ \ \ V V� \ � N \N\\\A 060\ \ �\ \ \ A\ \\:\ \\\ \ \I\ C EAR & GRUB *56 984 41 N..47:\•_4*t\tp..‘ \\4\--—\\\\ \ ISG I+S GROUP 4201 Bagley Ave. N Tel: 507/333-9460 Fax: 507/333-9485 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC. NO 47078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC. NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ISG AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ALDI, INC. RETAIL FACILITY REVISION SCHEDULE NO DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO 14-16408 FILE NAME 16408 TREE REMOVAL ALT DRAWN BY DEH DESIGNED BY DEH REVIEWED BY ATB ISSUE DATE 03/24/15 CLIENT PROJECT NO. TREE REMOVAL PLAN Agenda Item # 8B MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE: June 2, 2015 SUBJ: Highway 55/County Road 116 Intersection Layout Background The City of Medina has been working with Hennepin County, TKDA, and business owners to put together a preliminary plan for the Highway 55/116 intersection. On December 18, 2012, the Medina City Council approved a resolution for the preliminary concept layout for the reconstruction of the Highway 55/CR 116 intersection. Staff members from Hennepin County will be present at the meeting to discuss the updated preliminary plans for the 2017 project. Medina representatives met with Hennepin County and MNDOT representatives on April 24, 2015 on the Highway 55/CR 116 project. Hennepin County agreed to move forward with the interim improvements this summer if Medina agreed to move forward with the full - reconstruction of the intersection in 2017. Staff informed Hennepin County that we would need to have Council approve the proposed 60% plans, layout No. 4, for the proposed project to move forward. Final plans will still need to be approved by the City Council. Staff is working with the State and Hennepin County on a preliminary cost estimate on the Highway 55/CR 116 project. We will work to determine what is eligible under state aid for the project. Attached is a preliminary cost estimate for the project. An updated version incorporating what is eligible under state aid will be brought forward to the City Council in the near future for review. Staff Recommendation I recommend the City of Medina adopt a resolution approving the 60% plans, layout No. 4, for the proposed Highway 55/116 intersection project. The proposed project is scheduled to be constructed in 2017. Council Action Requested: Adopt resolution approving the preliminary concept layout for the reconstruction of the TH 55 at CR 116/CSAH 115 intersection Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2015-XX RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE TH 55 AT CR 116/CSAH 115 INTERSECTION WHEREAS, the City of Medina proposes to participate in the reconstruction of the intersection of TH 55 at CR 116/CSAH 115 with improved channelization and a second left turn lane from South CR 116 to TH 55 to increase safety and capacity at the intersection within the corporate City limits in Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, a preliminary concept layout has been developed based on engineering analysis as well as the input from the City of Medina, Hennepin County, Mn/DOT, Medina property owners, business owners and residents; and WHEREAS, the preliminary concept layout No. 4 was presented to the City Council at the June 2, 2015 meeting where additional feedback was solicited; and WHEREAS, the parking of motor vehicles is prohibited at all times on both sides of County Highway 116 throughout the project limits; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County, Mn/DOT, and the City of Medina will continue to work with impacted Medina businesses throughout the project design phase to improve traffic circulation; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Medina, that the City of Medina approves Layout No. 4, Hennepin County Project No. 0918, for the reconstruction of County Highway No. 116 at the intersection with TH 55. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes City staff to continue working with Mn/DOT and Hennepin County to investigate options to reduce impacts of access closures for Medina businesses and to obtain agency approval for the preliminary concept layout for the TH 55 at CR 116/CSAH 115 intersection reconstruction project. Resolution No. 2015-XX June 2, 2015 Dated: June 2, 2015. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Scott T. Johnson, Administrator -Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: (Absent: ) Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2015-XX 2 June 2, 2015 Hennepin County CR 116/TH 55 / CSAH 115 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL LAYOUT APPROVAL JUNE 2, 2015 REASON FOR APPROVAL HENNEPIN 115 COUNTY HENNEPIN 116 COUNTY Hennepin County is requesting approval of changes made to the design layout, most recently approved by the Medina City Council in December of 2012. List of changes: • New City street (north of McDonald's) now ends with a cul-de-sac • McDonald's access moved from CR 116 to new City street • Reduced CR 116 to 1 NB lane north of TH 55 (only one accepting lane needed) • NB right turn lane added to Mobil gas station and Clydesdale Trail • Median north of TH 55 redesigned to maximize SB left turn vehicle storage • Through lane and right turn lane on WB Clydesdale combined into one lane to reduce pavement width Recent/upcoming public involvement: • Meeting with McDonald's ownership and corporate staff — August 2014 • Medina staff (Dusty Finke) meeting with McDonald's • Meeting with Mobil gas station manager — May 2015 • Meeting with McDonald's ownership and corporate staff — May 2015 • Notification letters to businesses along CR 116 regarding interim improvements in summer 2015 (to be sent) Cost Summary (60% design) Medina - $870,000 (construction and right of way) - Optional $250,000 railroad quiet zone cost Hennepin County - $2,730,000 (construction, right of way, and railroad) MnDOT - $150,000 (traffic signal) Total - $3.75 million (without railroad quiet zone) Schedule: Interim Improvements — Summer 2015 Notice to proceed for right of way acquisition — April 2016 Construction start — April 2017 Hennepin County CR 116 / TH 55 / CSAH 115 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL LAYOUT APPROVAL JUNE 2, 2015 PROJECT BACKGROUND NEED FOR PROJECT HENNEPIN 115 COUNTY HENNEPIN 116 COUNTY Hennepin County and the City of Medina are undertaking this project to address safety, capacity, and mobility issues at the intersection. The long-term solution for the area is an interchange, with County Roads 115/116 bridging over Highway 55 and the railroad tracks. The funding and timeline for construction of an interchange are uncertain, so the County and the City have been working together for the past several years to develop shorter -term improvements for the area. These shorter - term improvements will improve safety, capacity, and mobility until the longer -term solution can be implemented. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The project will include replacement of the existing signal system at Highway 55, which is nearing the end of its useful life; construction of additional turn lanes and raised medians on County Roads 115/116; modified accesses; construction of a new City street with a cul-de-sac north of McDonald's; construction of pedestrian and bike trails; and an upgrade to the railroad crossing. WORK COMPLETED TO DATE Concept Phase: The City developed a concept layout for the proposed improvements. Following meetings with local businesses, Mn/DOT, and Hennepin County, the City Council approved the concept layout presented at the November 18, 2008, City Council meeting with conditions according to the resolution. Preliminary Design Phase: The County hired an engineering consultant, TKDA, to complete this phase of the project, which began in May 2011 and ended in December 2012. Work included: • Meetings with all affected businesses and property owners in the project area. Concerns related to the project and concept layout included potential loss of access to and from Highway 55, concerns about the proposed backage road west of County Road 116, the need to balance impacts and to be fair to all property owners, and the need to provide adequate compensation for property acquisition. • Field survey, wetland delineation, soil borings, geotechnical analyses, and an environmental site assessment to identify possible sources of contamination. • Traffic counts and a traffic study. The traffic analysis indicated that a traffic signal is not warranted at the County Road 116/ Clydesdale Trail intersection at this time, even if access closures are taken into account. The County has determined where the intersection ranks on their priority list for traffic signal construction. The priority factor calculated by the County is well below the threshold for installing a signal on the County system. Hennepin County CR 116 / TH 55 / CSAH 115 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL LAYOUT APPROVAL JUNE 2, 2015 HENNEPIN 115 COUNTY HENNEPIN 116 COUNTY After construction is completed, the County will continue to monitor traffic volumes and operations at the intersection. • Development of preliminary layout options and a preliminary layout that was approved by the City Council on December 18, 2012. Final Design Phase: The City, County, Mn/DOT, and TKDA began the final design phase in January 2013. The preliminary layout has been refined as more detailed design work has occurred. NEXT STEPS • Approval of the preliminary layout by the City, the County, and MnDOT. • Completion of construction plans and documents. • Acquisition of right-of-way and easements. CSAH 115/CR 116 COST ESTIMATE - 05/19/15 COUNTY CITY MnDOT TOTALS REMARKS CONSTRUCTION (1)(2) 90% $454,250 10% $52,900 $507,150 CITY COSTS INCLUDE 50% OF OUTSIDE CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS, AND STORM SEWER PER COST PARTICIPATION POLICY. CSAH 115 CR 116 90% $1,137,050 10% $131,500 $1,268,550 CITY COSTS INCLUDE 50% OF OUTSIDE CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS, AND STORM SEWER PER COST PARTICIPATION POLICY. CITY STREET (WEST) 82% $158,800 18% $35,900 $194,700 CITY COSTS INCLUDE 50% OF CURB AND GUTTER AND STORM SEWER PER COST PARTICIPATION POLICY AND COSTS FOR DRIVE A. COUNTY PARTICIPATION DUE TO ACCESS REMOVAL ON CR 116. CLYDESDALE TRAIL (EAST) 92% $103,700 8% $9,400 $113,100 CITY COSTS INCLUDE 50% OF CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS, AND STORM SEWER PER COST PARTICIPATION POLICY. WATERMAIN 100% $293,100 $293,100 CITY -OWNED UTILITY. 100% CITY COST. TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM 50% $151,200 50% $151,200 $302,400 50/50 COST SPLIT PER COST PARTICIPATION POLICY. SUBTOTALS $2,005,000 $522,800 $151,200 $2,679,000 RIGHT-OF-WAY (3) CSAH 115 50% $21,300 50% $21,300 $42,600 50/50 COST SPLIT PER COST PARTICIPATION POLICY. CR 116 50% $160,800 50% $160,800 $321,600 50/50 COST SPLIT PER COST PARTICIPATION POLICY. CITY STREET (WEST) 45% $118,600 55% $143,300 $261,900 50/50 COST SPLIT PER COST PARTICIPATION POLICY, EXCEPT 100% CITY COST FOR DRIVE A. CLYDESDALE TRAIL (EAST) 50% $18,600 50% $18,600 $37,200 50/50 COST SPLIT PER COST PARTICIPATION POLICY. SUBTOTALS $319,300 $344,000 $663,300 RAILROAD CROSSING 100% $125,000 $125,000 100% COUNTY COST. SIGNAL AND GATE REPLACEMENT 100% $280,000 $280,000 100% COUNTY COST. SUBTOTALS $405,000 $405,000 PROJECT TOTALS 73% $2,729,300 23% $866,800 4% $151,200 $3,747,300 RAILROAD QUIET ZONE (GATES) 100% $250,000 $250,000 100% CITY COST. QUIET ZONE CAN BE IMPLEMENTED AFTER ROADWAY PROJECT. NOTES: (1) INCLUDES 10% CONTINGENCIES. (2) COUNTY AND CITY COSTS INCLUDE PRORATED SHARE OF MOBILIZATION, FIELD OFFICE AND LABORATORY, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (3) INCLUDES 5%CONTINGENCIES. I l +_. I l al l lot 0' zl l l N l.,l l o l l �I II N 4- l l o > "> > l o o v I I a a a I .mil O p 10 o m�l�l N� (n �I l l = L + -, � : _ + E al a_ n l V In a--p ­ Nc>i ani L l �l ozl l U) l lL = l l I: z �I of l o 0 w �l col Jl N a l J I a a a a l � � �� �l o l r-r wl ~I m l l I-Il JI LnI a of a of �I l + L �I wi of �I l L CD l H O O + + III of JI o a� C o + + l a �l �I Gil °I_' E w a m c 1=1 00I l In Y J Q H o m E o CD LL C) m o, + 0 3 In U (n d 0 U h z M s z � oa J ? v" o o d d d Q L \ Q V ~ O0 71 0 W O: O m ou E (y LL G }SO ZJ O L m w w u, c m or <o O c z L 0 wm Q w a 0 o w 00 O O, m L W C o m sm m o c } w w a z O 0 T U C W 00 a L wz C c O m 0 J m a O LL E + w w< O o L CO dti z a E r w cow Q t + t t < uu W 31 J 0 O O U O J L L L L FO 0 � m m a a oa o o a o aw C V O O O 0 J H C +L +L +L +L W OL 0 0 0 0 � J Q 0 H } p J F o W 0 00 m m cc E-O N `" 0 N N 0) cwi LL 3 3 3 O mi (T 0) 0) 0) L w r Q > > > a ac Il 1Y 1Y Of 4 ._+ a z v SCALE 2000 0 2000 4000 FEET H[]ENN]EPIN COUNTY N W LAYOUT HISTORY November 18, 2008 Medina City Council approved the preliminary concept layout (Resolution No. 2008-79), while reserving the right to withdraw the project if the concerns of affected property owners were not sufficiently addressed. May 2011 October 2011 The layout was presented to the Medina City Council at a work session on October 18, 2011. The following items were the major revisions incorporated into the layout. • Eliminated accesses on Tower Drive to North Star Mattress and to the undeveloped property east of CSAH 115. • Shifted combined access for Mobil and Dairy Queen to the east to be a combined access for Dairy Queen and the Chiropractic Clinic and Peg's Catering. • Widened Clydesdale Trail and west backage road approaches t0 CR 116. • Eliminated cul-de-sac west of McDonald's. • Showed Orion of sidewalk along backage road. • Developed 3 options for Clydesdale Trail. November 2011 August 2012 The following items were the major revisions incorporated into the layout. • Eliminated driveway closures along TH 55. • Eliminated the west backage road, replacing it with a driveway to McDonalds, Intercomp, and Countryside Cafe. • Utilized a minor alignment shift of Clydesdale Trail to minimize property impacts. An east backage mad was not provided. Layout and Profile No. 3 was submitted to the County on July 26, 2012 and to MnDOT on August 8, 2012. The Layout Approval Committee (LAC) met on August 22, 2012, and provided comments in a memorandum dated August 29, 2012. September 2012 December 2012 (Revisions from Layout 3 to Layout 3A) The comments received from the LAC were incorporated into the layout. Po y Added a typical section for TH 55. Per a comment from the Mene Traffic Office, existing traffic counts were added to the layout. Per direction from the City Of Medina, the access for Intercomp (approx. CR 116 SB Sta. 77+50) was changed from right-INright-Oul to right -In only. The layout was approved by the Medina City Council on December 18, 2012 (Resolution No. 2012-93). Layout and Profile No. 3A was submitted to MnDOT on December 27 2012. The Layout Y Y Approval Committee (LAC) melon January 16, 2013, and provided comments in a memorandum dated January 25, 2013. January 2013 August 2014(Revisions from Layout 3A to Layout 3B) The comments received from the LAC were Incorporated Into the layout, including showing the turning paths for the southbound CR 116 to eastbound TH 55 dual -left turn using a WB-62 in the outside lane and a 14'slrip alongside in the inside lane. The following additional major revisions were incorporated into the layout: • Removed the crosswalk across the west leg of the TH 55/CSAH 115/CR 116 Intersection. • Removed the median closures on TH 55. Replaced the driveway access to McDonald's, Intercomp, and Countryside Cafe with a City street, a cul-de-sac, and accompanying driveway connections. • Removed the right -out access from McDonald's onto CR 116. Layout and Profle No. 38 was submitted to MnDOT on August 20, 2014, May 2015 (Revisions from Layout 3B to Layout 4) The comments received from the LAC were incorporated into the layout, including the following major revisions: Shifted the CR 116 raised median north Of TH 55 to the east, for the purpose of having two southbound through lanes north of Clydesdale Trail supplying traffic to the two left turn lanes approaching TH 55. Eliminated a northbound CR 116 though lane north of TH 55 and added a right turn lane approaching Mobil and Clydesdale Trail. • Eliminated the westbound Clydesdale Trail right turn lane approaching CR 116. S E LOCATION GENERAL NOTES: • There are no design exceptions. • Pedestrian accommodations will meet ADA/PROWAG requirements. 0 ®1 Ei3 W 200 p Ji4 t15AM/15PM �165AM/95PM LOAM/IOPM , ` 30AM/IOPM 100AM/145PM� lOAM/IOPM-it -t 1 r CSAH 115 000 a « 000 PROJECTED 2020 TRAFFIC VOLUMES t-120AM/75PM �150AM/85PM lOAM/25PM , i 860AM/230PM 90AM/12OPM 20AM/55PM 7 CSAH 115 P CR 116 - b O 2�%y \ yry _V yh h� PROJECTED 2020 TRAFFIC VOLUMES «� « C n� ��JJ' 3 ) 820 TOW / R DR w J DITTER C OLING [ N y o, / COUNTY DITCH 26 - m 1 \moo \ M Q p � N t-55AM/20PM �1040AM/335PM SOAM/95PM-J i 65AM/25PM 220AM/1135PM- 6OAM/3OPM 7 CR 116 '1 t w Z O ? Q 0<� W ooP pti U � PROJECTED 2020 TRAFFIC VOLUMES 14UU LVLMUMLLIN RUHU MEDINA GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB LEGEND PROPOSED ROADWAY PROPOSED CURB/RAISED MEDIAN _ PROPOSED SHOULDER _ PROPOSED TRAIL ® WETLAND 11IIII POTENTIAL SIDEWALK ® EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL • PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL iC DRIVEWAY CLOSURE - - - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY NEW RIGHT-OF-WAY SE- SLOPE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE - - - - - - - CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW 60 SCALE IN FEET 3939 CO RD 116 FLAGSHIP TECHNOLOGIES INC END CONSTRUCTION CR 116 STA. 43 + 42.63 CR 116 CR 116 INPLACE TYPICAL SECTIONS CSAH I15CL THRU LANE I LT l INPLACE CSAH 115 SOUTH OF TH 55 CO RD 116CL ---------------------- -- -- INPLACE CO RD 116 NORTH OF TH 55 CO RD 116CL I c TRAILv BLVD SHLD. THRU LANE THRU LANE SHIED. ------'------------_. INPLACE CO RD 116 NORTH OF CLYDESDALE TRAIL 2' E CSAH 115CL CSAH 115 SOUTH OF TOWER DRIVE CSAH 115SB CSAH 115NB CSAH 115 SOUTH OF TH 55 E CO RD 1I6SB PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS GN CO RD 116NB �L.OI' 1 8' 13' 11' 11' 13' VAR. 13' 1 13' 61 -UMINOUS RT TURN LANE THRU LANE LT TURN LANE LT TURN LANE MEDIAN THRU LANE RT TURN LANE SITUMINC iRED-USE SHARED-L PATH PATH CONC. B624 C&G PROFILE B624 C&G B624 C&G PROFILE 6624 C&G CONC. GRADE GRADE 0.02 0�_02 0�_02 0.02 0.02 0`02 0.02 CO RD 116 NORTH OF TH 55 CSAH 115 SB CR 116 SB TRAFFIC TRAFFIC m 6 _J M 35 oM;oM 35 55 55 b^$ E DRIVEWAY VPI 77+70.91 <d 4 - '$ - -I EL. 1.000.15 Q TOWER DR o N VPI 75+00.00 EL. 995.28 :I SSD = 380' 1tl 0 m HSD > 35 MPH l- 55 MPH) 3018. I M 0.05' H" uoi, K =: 194 uoi. K Ill N o w -• O1 : 165.00' V.C. m m I 68.20 V.C.'. 1,005, EXISTING GROUND - VPI 62+50.05 T 1p m e con 11005 r- �' VPI 71+51657 + ? c '- m. I EL: 9%.85 " �x > a : EL:992:02 - m : �L CITY STREET of @ diwY - XSD > 30 MPH � d 1 > dQ = > z NSD > ]5 MPH a- a � w w c r � > � w c m : M= 0.20' to u Q TH 55 M Olfi' o+1.1� w> I.000 - •+ TI -3.15%'. K=50 $ z da > Tr CL: TH 55 EB :1!DOD __'w^ .WE c X: 12 a 50.00' V.C. E RKz i'ma' 10500 VC _ $' EXISTING GROUND �___ +S.BOY. 99$ f - 995 a o. s Of EYEOHT N o le ^ t PROFILE GRADE s8� + •35X +0.95X ? m : ui v -0.50 990.. �.. (TOP FINISHED SURFACE) n 990 } + w 0 4 ._.!o O _. _ T T V - t PROFILE GRADE 985 985 (TOP FINISHED SURFACE) _ '^ Yoo m 0 980 980 _. - - IN POINT STA. T1+40.33 fib' EL. 992.19 : ACHIEVES 10 SECOND SIGHT 975 975 DISTANCE. FOR 48 MPH 970 970 t-2.67' 2' 1S SE Yp CO RD 116SB CI CO RD 116NB B624 C&G PROFILE B624 C&G / GRADE PROFILE E GRAD CO RD 116 NORTH OF CLYDESDALE TRAIL CL CO RD 116CL CO RD 116 AT NORTH END OF PROJECT - :. CITY STREET CLYDESDALE TRAIL EB - ......... ..... _. TRAFFIC_ _ - _.:_ __-....:-.. TRAFFIC- '....... ....i. i_..... .i..... ..i.. ._. _. _. - -- -' -DRIVEWAY It DRIVEWAY Io f, 0 .. -t DRIVEWAY MAY - m - $ r $ OPNEill E DRIVEWAY GL CR 116 NB CL DRIVEWAY :.. WI tl!OOAD mm H m ,� -' _ E CR tl6 SB _ $ EL. 994.75 0 r 1 m a 9 ! $ -HSD > 30 MPHO -• ^ 8: u m m M 7. o M= 0.13' Y ui - •• Mid _ E%ISTING GROUND 1000 a"f'. K 30 :. 11000 ^&' K-iS °'._.. o V.C: X. �... g Gl 90.00' V.C. i � W.43X m ]X k 07 995 995... 4.25'OBJEL7 $ry M -O.bY_ K-17 $m -0.50X VP[12+50.000m - $ i^n EL 99730 v 90.00'V.C. a u SS p rs r --_ - - -_ __ �_ - .-' 990 +m ��. m nm m 990 "IR Ra U301PN1 m$' _v L iw •l: P`&, �rH aLi MX -0.'4'^v� >w d n d ' 90 0go vgc1. 985 - 985 _.. _. E> E PROFILFIGRAOE (TOP FIN SH �ACEI 980 980 '.. 975 970 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 60 61 62 63 64 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 CL CSAH 115 CSAH 115 NB CR 116 NB ii CR 116 - TRAFFIC TRAFFIC- -TRAFFIC m ,TRAFFICin a c o7;; _ I� ORIVEWAY . : : 35 35 55 55 HIGH POINT . ei• STA. 39+40.0 rail o - VPI:37+78.44 EL. 1,001.50 0 0' .. > < w o $ - VPI 35+30.00 I -EL 1.000.13 - + r' E DRIVEWAY r� m o 0 ,ti o Q TOWER; DR n m - o m ''Fl. 995.66 SSD = 380'. $ :. w z 0 +M' � Ui : ti. Qm HSD > 35 11PN l='.55 MPH) V o F 1,015 ..... !. a ... 1010 I N .. r M ui O 1 010 +. p. ... M'P. rD.DS' 1,010 I - ...... ....:.. .:.. ........a :o .. :.. ..... 1 U :.. ..: ..:.. .... .... m> W w..1....:M.=D1T' g V m F m P N �' 'e ^ °' K= 206 N I K a 111 t PROFILE GRADE r�. E DRIVEWAY- > J a w > J w + w of n o 165.00' V.C. iv v 68.20' V.C. H (TOP FINISHED SURFACE) VP1 42+60.13- - - CL TOWER DR n m O1 n � w o M r .+. m n ni m : ''. > d : n _ I o z � r +... m EC. 997.50 - zo v o 11010 :..__.. L DOS < VPI 22+75.00 e ! 1.005 ... o r CLYDESDALE :..m 1, 005 :..... :....... m HSD..). 55. MPH W + r ..... .......... .. EXISTING GROUND EL. 995.96 ......� �.. w N U _.........' .;...... _........ > It `> .. d _. i .. d _.. _.. : TRAIL: EB a .....:. .__ < '" ......_.:.. ____...:.. _. `1.80% E%ISTING Gg01M0 Q m__.. T M °i EXISTING GROUND HSD > 30 MPH : .. : : CL CLYpESDALE �> d i1.BOT• > W K= 131 -31 Si I M = 0.28, w > 2 CL TH 55 WB VPI 31+63.41 TRAIL WB I I65.00' V.C. - w > w 1.005 . :.... I.000 - I : K = 36 - TRIK R z._ E TH. 55. EB '. 1.000 w EL. 991.99 E DRIVEWAY '.z +1.19% 11000 - ...... .............. ......: _.. _. ._.. m_. 80.00'V.C. z _. ...._..... m _.HSD->-35'MPH _�.. _ _ <.. __... .. _.__. ... VPI 39 40.00 ... ... m < z M'= 0.18' EXISTING Cfl01MD < H,0 :I :m m w a EL. 1.003.26 -t.80% - + 0 a K a 66 om o z a z +1.80% - _ :.2.eli 995 995 0 105.00'V.C. L I - - 995 - w^ HSOD 558 MPH ...... ... @PROFILE GRADE. -0.62X ....:...... .........._ .'... - ,_ ,., n ,._ m �' ..._ M -109 m - (TOP FINISHED SURFACE) +1.00% Q n K a 109 P ppq[[ gg qq E m -o.6oL, • m W d 995 - 990 : (TOPOFIMISHED SURFACE) "+ 990 m o + v .. �`+ 990 u 391.00'-V.C. r a in + M + t PROFILE GRADE u v 990 985 985 (TOP FINISHED SURFACE) > d uQi. 985 _ LOW POINT _...�. c__ - STA. 33+50.29 " EL. 992.19 f a 985 980 980 ><Gi 980. 980 975 - 975 975. - fl 12 13 14 20 21 22 23 24 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 - 48 49 i 1 YJI x x .a _0 40 , �_ o 0 P o Amb SCALE IN FEET 0 , �\ � � ( SCALE IN FEET 0 60 120 0 60 120 SE 6 r -- sc SE n { t j EXISTING 10 TRAIL � 1 i i 1 �� ° : 1 �� EASEMENT r - r >� - J ' I v 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 1 — ,10 L_ _ °e sEsEsE �110, PC_ _ _ — _ _—_ _ — — — \ — _ Q _ I _ — _ _ _ _ _ — _ — - _ 111111 1 1 -- -- --- -- --- -- - -- 2= RTL • - - - ------ 60 ---- 16' - 70 �. 11~ �. 75 3 — -- _------ ---_----------------- � al 10 ° 11' 6' 1a15 �� .11' .- 11 10- - - °15 ° �- , 1 0 a - - CSAH 115 - 13' 70' LTL 1°5 _ - (9 3 5 1e1- 16 1055 i - _ •r 13 220 LTL o � 13 300 LTL - 13' 22'5' LTL -� 70 TL 1 80 LT 1015 1°5 1.5 1010 CR 11 t�� 13' 11 _ � � 12� � e55 12 105 1:15 - --- - 13' 1 13� �� 14' 1e55 ------ 225 RTL � o \o\ FUTURE TRAIL �� __ ------ _ _ -----= -\ ; --- -- \ r- --,----X�-- -___ -- =xc— - -- --- - �' — � 111 11 1 7 'SE�—\_ \ — ——��`// V 1SE 0 ' LT �� 1 ' ._ — — — — — — /�/�%� SE SE —, I t �SE SE —SE —SE 9E—SE SE SE - - SE OD -81/ V o A \ y, °, � t>� 0 �� r /' ❑o 000 �, � o ° x Uj LU 1\ 0 A. / b \\ LEGEND V / PROPOSED ROADWAY PROPOSED CURB/RAISED MEDIAN PROPOSED SHOULDER ti / o ° PROPOSED TRAIL J PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVEWAY ► ► --- -__ �- PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVEWAY 0 (CITY COST) / 0 WETLANDS POTENTIAL SIDEWALK EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL 414 PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL DRIVEWAY CLOSURE co EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY 441- NEW RIGHT-OF-WAY �o V —SE — SLOPE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE — ----- ---- / ► ► -- ° / ------- CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TRAFFIC FLOW ARROWS '° / / 0Layout 3 - Option 3 \ \� 0 CSAH 115/CR 116 At TH 55 NOVEMBER 21, 2012 Agenda Item # 8C MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: May 28, 2015 MEETING: June 2, 2015 City Council SUBJ: Wright -Hennepin —CUP for Solar Panels-4315 Willow Dr. Review Deadline Application Received: April 10, 2015 60-day Review Deadline: June 9, 2015 Overview of Request Wright -Hennepin Electric Cooperative has requested a Conditional Use Permit to construct a ground mounted solar array at its property at 4315 Willow Drive. The subject property contains an existing electric substation and accessory uses including backup generators. Business development exists to the north and east. The remaining surrounding property is currently farmed but planned for future Business development. An aerial of the site can be found below. The City recently updated its zoning ordinance "Solar Equipment which is not affixed to a structure" as a conditional use in the Business District and established standards by which to review requests. The footprint of the proposed solar array is 21,200 square feet and is proposed in the eastern portion of the site. The applicant has an existing conditional use permit for the existing improvements on the site. This document is attached for reference. Staff intends to replace the 2004 CUP with an updated CUP if the solar array is approved for the sake of clarity. Analysis The following table summarizes the proposed solar panel array in comparison to the general minimum standards of the district. Solar equipment has additional standards which will be discussed below the table. District Standard Proposed Front Setback 40 feet 120 feet Rear Setback 25 feet 640 feet (solar panels) Side Setback 25 feet 25 feet (south) 108 feet (north) Residential Setback 100 feet 1450 feet Railroad Setback Zero 108 feet Impervious Surfaces 70% 25% Solar Equipment Standards The following standards were established for Solar Equipment, if not affixed to a structure. Staff has briefly described whether the proposal complies with each requirement in italics. (a) Solar Equipment which is not affixed to a structure shall only be permitted in the Business and Industrial Park zoning districts and only following Conditional Use Permit approval. Applicant has requested conditional use permit approval. (b) Solar Equipment shall be a minimum of 300 feet from residential property. Proposed equipment is 1450 feet from residentially zoned property, and almost 1200 feet from the nearest property containing a residence (which is guided for future business development). (c) Solar Equipment shall meet all setback requirements for principal structures in the zoning district where located. Setbacks are summarized above and the proposed array meets the minimum requirements. (d) The footprint occupied by Solar Equipment shall be considered lot coverage and impervious surface for the purpose of calculating such standards. The footprint shall include all space between pieces of Solar Equipment, unless the pieces are separated by more than 25 feet. The footprint containing all the solar equipment is 21,200 sf in area and was included in the impervious surface calculations above. Wright -Hennepin Electric Cooperative Page 2 of 5 June 2, 2015 Ground mounted solar CUP City Council Meeting (e) The footprint occupied by Solar Equipment shall not exceed 20% of the lot. The proposed solar equipment occupies 8.4% of the lot. (f) The equipment or device may not exceed a height of 20 feet. The proposed equipment is 10 feet in height. (g) The City may require landscaping or other means of screening to limit visual impacts of the mounting devices of the Solar Equipment. Landscaping will be described more in depth below. (h) The equipment or device must be designed and constructed in compliance with all applicable building and electrical codes. These matters will be reviewed upon building permit application if the CUP is approved. (i) The equipment or device must be in compliance with all state and federal regulations regarding co -generation of energy. The applicant has indicated that they will comply with relevant regulations, although this condition is less relevant because they are a utility. 0) All solar arrays or panels shall be installed or positioned so as not to cause any glare or reflective sunlight onto neighboring properties or structures, or obstruct views. The proposed panels are double sided with no reflectors. Their purpose is to absorb the sunlight rather than reflect so should cause little glare. (k) The City may require compliance with any other conditions, restrictions or limitations deemed reasonably necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare and to promote harmony with neighboring uses. The Planning Commission and Council can discuss if further conditions are warranted. Landscaping The district standards would require a minimum planting of 47 overstory trees, 23 ornamental trees, and 77 shrubs upon new development in the district. In addition, the requirements for ground mounted solar equipment allow the City to require additional screening. The site was developed prior to current standards and the landscaping consists of 28 trees and is currently non -conforming with regards to landscaping. Staff believes that, because an additional use is being added to the site, it would be reasonable to require full compliance with the landscaping requirements if the Planning Commission and Council found it preferable. However, the bringing of the site into full compliance with current standards would be substantial in comparison to the cost of the panels. Staff has discussed an alternative whereas only the perimeter of the portion of the lot occupied by the solar panels could be brought into compliance with the landscaping requirements. This area of the lot would require 23 overstory trees, 12 ornamental trees, and 39 shrubs. There are 18 existing evergreen trees in this area. The Planning Commission discussed this alternative and found it to be reasonable. It is included as one of their recommended conditions. Wright -Hennepin Electric Cooperative Page 3 of 5 June 2, 2015 Ground mounted solar CUP City Council Meeting Stormwater Regulations The area of the proposed solar array drains to the existing stormwater pond on the site. The City Engineer has determined that the solar panels themselves should not constitute hardcover. This was determined by considering the height of the proposed panels, the fact the area underneath will not be disturbed with the exception of footings, and the amount of runoff which can run between panels. The footings would be considered hardcover, but this amount of hardcover does not trigger additional stormwater improvements. Review Criteria Section 825.39 of the City Code establishes the general criteria that the City considers when reviewing a conditional use permit request. These criteria are copied below, with a potential finding provided by staff for each. In addition to these general criteria, the specific standards described above are required to be met. Subd. 1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. Staff does not believe the proposed panels would cause these concerns. Subd. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. Staff does not believe the proposed panels would cause these concerns. Subd. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. Staff recommends a condition that stormwater management ordinance is met and that utility lines are underground. Subd. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. Staff does not believe the proposed panels would cause these concerns. Subd. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. Staff does not believe the proposed panels would cause these concerns. Subd. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. The use is permitted in the district and the Planning Commission and Council discussed the use specifically and determined that it was appropriate to add as an allowed use. Subd. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The use is permitted in the district and the Planning Commission and Council discussed the use specifically and determined that it was appropriate to add as an allowed use. Wright -Hennepin Electric Cooperative Page 4 of 5 June 2, 2015 Ground mounted solar CUP City Council Meeting Subd. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. The proposed use is permitted in the district and staff believes the applicant has shown general compliance with relevant regulations and policies. Subd. 9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. Staff does not believe the proposed panels would cause these concerns. Subd. 10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. As noted above, staff recommends additional landscaping around the solar array. Subd. 11. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. The applicant desires to complete construction over the summer. Subd.12. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer. Hennepin County records state that Wright -Hennepin owns the property. Review of a conditional use permit is a quasi-judicial process with a relatively low level of discretion for the City (as opposed to PUDs, variances, rezonings, etc.). The City can, however, apply conditions to a conditional use in order to protect the health safety and welfare. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at their May meeting. No public comment was offered. Following a brief discussion, the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the CUP. Minutes from the meeting are attached. The Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions: 1) This CUP shall supersede the approval granted by Resolution 04-23, the relevant findings and conditions having been incorporated herein. 2) The landscaping plan shall be updated to include 5 additional overstory trees, 12 ornamental trees, and 39 shrubs. 3) All exterior lighting must be designed and installed to be downcast only, with a maximum of 0.2 foot candles at the property line and the light poles may be a maximum of 30' in height; 4) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in the amount sufficient to pay for all costs associated with the review of the Conditional Use Permit application. Potential Motion Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the CUP based upon the findings noted in the staff report and subject to conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Attachments 1. List of Documents 2. Excerpt from DRAFT 5/12/2015 Planning Commission minutes 3. Engineering Comments dated 4/22/2015 and 5/28/2015 4. Applicant Narrative 5. Plans received by City 4/10/2015 Wright -Hennepin Electric Cooperative Page 5 of 5 June 2, 2015 Ground mounted solar CUP City Council Meeting Project: LR-15-158 — Wright -Hennepin Solar Panel CUP The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 4/10/2015 4/10/2015 4 Application Y Fee 4/10/2015 4/9/2015 1 Fee Y $2000 Mailing Labels 4/10/2015 4/3/2015 5 Labels Y Narrative 4/10/2015 N/A 9 Narrative Y Plan Set 4/10/2015 N/A 4 Plans Y Documents from Staff/Consultants/Aeencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Engineer Comments 4/22/2015 1 EngComments Planning Commission Report 5/4/2015 22 22 pages with attachments and plans Public Comments Document Date # of pages Electronic Planning Commission meeting minutes 5/12/2015 2 DRAFT excerpt is 2 pages Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 5/12/2015 Meeting Minutes Wright -Hennepin Cooperative — 4315 Willow Drive — Conditional Use Permit Request to Install Ground Mounted Solar Arrays Finke stated that the Commission discussed this topic in a general sense a few months prior when the zoning ordinance was amended to include ground mounted solar panels. He stated that the applicant is proposing a 2,100 square foot footprint for the solar array at their substation on Willow Drive. He reviewed the adjacent development and stated that the applicant is proposing dual faced solar panels. He reviewed the general standards and specific standards for solar equipment that the Commission would consider when reviewing this request. He stated that the landscaping as exists today is nonconforming and advised that full compliance may be too high of a bar to set given the use. He stated that staff would support some additional landscaping. He noted that in addition to the general standards, ground mounted solar can require additional screening if deemed necessary. He stated that staff recommends approval with the conditions noted in the staff report. Nolan questioned if it was true that the panels would not reflect light. Finke stated that panels have evolved over time and noted that the sites staff visited did not have an issue with glare. Nolan questioned if this would be an accessory use to the substation. He questioned if other activities could go on the site in the future, such as an office building for the applicant. Finke stated that he would not have an opinion either way but recognized that the solar panels would most likely be considered an accessory use. He stated that any use allowed in the district could be proposed in the future, given that the necessary conditions could be met. Albers questioned the percentage of the lot the solar panels would occupy. Finke reported that the solar panels would occupy 8.4 percent of the lot. Wayne Bauemschmitt, Wright -Hennepin Electric, stated that he was present to answer any questions the Commission may have. He stated that this is a community solar project funded solely by the members that want to buy solar capacity to pay for their own system. He thanked the City for developing a solar ordinance that would work with this request. He asked that the number of plantings be kept down as too many plantings would cause the panels to be overshadowed. Reid referenced the number of over story trees proposed by staff and questioned if that would interfere with the solar panels. Bauemschmitt stated that he believes that would be a workable project but noted that if the landscaping had to be in full compliance he did not feel that the project could be successful. Albers questioned the amount of energy that would be generated. Bauernschmitt stated that 147kw would be generated and noted that a typical home would use approximately three to 3.5kw. Albers questioned if the other side of the substation had been considered for the solar array. Bauemschmitt stated that location would not be practical because it is a north facing slope. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 5/12/2015 Meeting Minutes Murrin questioned if a transformer would have to be moved. Bauernschmitt stated that the lines leaving the substation are underground and advised that a transformer would be installed during this process. He stated that they are very small and there would be three used for the larger developments in Medina. Albers questioned the type of fencing that would be installed around the array. Bauernschmitt stated that fencing is not proposed at this time. He noted that other sites were visited by staff and the Council and advised that there is not fencing at those locations. He stated that there is a 24 hour security and cameras at the Rockford location and noted that something similar would be proposed for this location. Reid questioned if those participating would have a higher or lower rate. Bauernschmitt reported that there would be a slightly higher rate but explained that those consumers would be making an investment in their future rates. He provided additional information regarding the solar array and measures that eliminate glare. Nolan opened the public hearing at 8:40 p.m. No comments made. Nolan closed the public hearing at 8:41 p.m. Motion by White, seconded by Albers, to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit based upon the findings noted in the staff report and subject to the conditions recommended by staff, including the scaled down landscaping. Motion approved unanimously. 2 WSB & Assoc engineering - planning - environmental - construction Memorandum To: Tom Kellogg, P.E., City Engineer City of Medina From: Earth Evans, P.E. Water Resources Project Manager WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: 4.22.15 Re: Willow Substation Community Solar Array Stormwater Management Plan Review City Project No. LR-I5-158 WSB Project No. 2712-42 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have completed a preliminary review of the stormwater management plan for Willow Community Solar Array in Medina, MN. The site is located south of the Soo Line Railroad and west of Willow Drive. Documents provided for review include the following: • Grading and Erosion Control Plan dated 7.28.03 These plans were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's Stormwater Design Manual and general engineering practices for stormwater management. 1. The proposed solar array has been incorporated into the existing Willow Substation site. Based on our review of the solar panel layout, it appears that they will function essentially as impervious surfaces. The footprint appears large enough to trigger City stormwater requirements. Future submittals should confirm that either the existing BMPs constructed with the Willow Substation are sufficient, or provide additional BMPs to meet the City's requirements. 2. No grading is shown for the proposed solar array. Confirm that no grading is required. St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02712-420\Admin0ms\Willow substation 042215.doc Dusty Finke From: Earth Evans <EEvans@wsbeng.com> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:40 AM To: Dusty Finke Cc: Tom Kellogg Subject: FW: Wright Hennepin Solar Garden Dusty, Based on new information we received from Wayne at Wright Hennepin Solar, I don't think they need to do anything for stormwater. The height of the solar panels is above 6', which is sufficient for plants to grow beneath the systems and allow for the surface to remain pervious. And I think that 10" is sufficient spacing to allow for runoff to travel through the panels and not sheet off the entire system. Let me know if you need anything additional. Thanks Earth Earth 763-231-4877 Earth Evans, PE Project Manager d: 763-231-4877 1 c: 612-437-5629 WSB & Associates, Inc. 1 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 3001 Minneapolis, MN 55416 solutions I design WSB gQVQFnMRnV101 �.mMgr�rl�p[ g ngrgy N+T - O FIR M J.4Ir1Y9l1 This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB & Associates, Inc. does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy. From: Wayne Bauernschmitt, Planning and Key Accounts Manager[maiIto: wbauernschmitt(a)whe.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 4:26 PM To: Earth Evans Cc: Tom Kellogg Subject: Re: Wright Hennepin Solar Garden Earth We project the maximum height of the solar arrays will be 6 1/2 feet high. Wayne Bauernschmitt Wdght=Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association Willow Community SolarArray Medina Minnesota tv. A Wright -Hennepin OrDperalive EIec1ric Asscaciekion Wright -Hennepin Willow Community Solar Array Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association (WH), an RUS financed rural electric utility, and its wholly -owned subsidiary, WH Solar, design, build, and operate community solar arrays throughout our electric serving area which covers the rural areas of Wright County, Western Hennepin County, and small portions Stearns, Sherburne, Meeker, and McCleod Counties. W-H is headquartered in Rockford, Minnesota. WH is proposing to construct a community solar array on a small portion of the land acquired for WH's Willow Electric Substation. The Willow Community Solar Array will produce approximately 280,000 kWh of electricity per year for the next 20 years. The energy will be solar to WH Electric customers in increments of 900 kWh. The community solar members will be able to purchase from one panel -unit (900 kWh/yr) of energy up to 100% of their annual load. The proposed array will be WH's third community solar array, and WH will be building more as the demand for solar continues. WH's goal is to spread the community solar arrays throughout the serving. The first two arrays are located on our headquarters land in Rockford. The Willow Substation/City of Medina location was chosen because of the available land and the fact that it is centrally located in our serving area. The solar array will consist of approximately 700 solar panels rated at 400 DC Watts each. The total area of the array will be slightly less than 20,000 square feet. The attached drawings illustrate the planned location of the array as we as the location of the shrubbery. The panels will be anchored to the ground and supported by helical screw anchors as shown in the attached drawing. At no point will the total height of the array exceed 10 feet above the ground. Depth of the anchors will be determined by soil boring analysis, and the final design will be stamped by a professional engineer. The underside of the array will be natural grasses that will grow in the shade of the array and should not have to be mowed. The proposed schedule will proceed upon completion of the conditional use permitting from the City of Medina. We have tentatively scheduled to energize the array in early summer. 7 70' WITA z E LU 9.0 7 \ J- q co z El F1 W x 3 00 0 3 m m 9 U) X 1 991's i i _ I — IZ❑ d❑ ❑ Fr•e enerl I I I PLA 9231 Penn Avenue South S O Minneapolis, MN 55431 I I I C❑❑ ❑ LriWSdar ❑3 W M ❑w S ❑Fina FFF]n R❑=-d, MN 55340 Pr❑C6[]AD❑141817-06 I Drawn ❑❑QUID 3/23/2015 I I Re❑06 I I I 50' T SLae ❑ S❑❑❑ar❑ I dJV DC 280.00 dJV AC 147.00 Ste❑ DUO M❑dIle CanKLLAar ❑T-A 40OW 9 9 ❑ I ❑ Dan 700 TTF 25°, 15' InCerFi�r B❑❑ FinKnlar 8.4 1VV I ❑ Elan = 17 I InLonlr B❑❑ CanKLLAar 4.2 aN 1 ❑ Dan ® 1 Ste❑ A7m ❑n 180°, 0° I CONCEPT N ❑❑F Or C En EIT ❑ N 0 30- 6011 AIN S O L A R The Best Energy Density System produces up to 60% more kWh/ftzthan legacy solar arrays Best Financial Return Paired modules yield consistent energy production any time of day Shading Tolerant Cell -Independence minimizes impact of partial module coverage Better Safety Low voltage prevents risk of electrical arcs and lethal shock Storage Ready Integrated charge controller supports battery storage options tenKsolar Toll free:877-432-1010 9231 Penn Avenue South www.tenKsolar.com Minneapolis, MN 55431 info@tenKsolar.com V@tenKsolar High Energy Output per Roof Two tenK Modules are installed in tandem, providing complete PV coverage of any space to maximize energy output. The Complete System Modules, racking, and inversion are combined into one completely integrated product, driving performance up by eliminating compatibility issues of traditional panel solutions. Reliable Architecture The DUO System ystem incorporates a parallel architecture from cells through inversion. The components are completely redundant, resulting in more energy production and significantly lower maintenance costs. Solar's Best Warranty. Power warranted for 92.2% of max after 25 years, guaranteeing the best return on your investment. 100 v 96 0 a 92 0 88 1 5 10 15 20 25 Years Simply More Energy DUO PV System I? Cn N O N System Wave Dimensions Front View 78.09" 78.09" 78.09" (198.35 cm) (198.35 cm) (198.35 cm) Side View 25.030 25.03° 103.54" (263.00 cm) Exterior Rail 96.46" 245.00 cm Fin Pin Spacing Module Certifications l 15.09° 25.03° 99.61" (253.00 cm) Interior Rail 99.61" (253.00 cm) Wavelet Pitch So 15.090 25.03° 103.54" (263.00 cm) Exterior Rail 99.61" (253.00 cm) Wavelet Pitch U L 1703/U L 1741 IEC 61215 EN 61730 Specifications and design are subject to change without notice. Read operating instructions carefully before using this product. Patents Pending �® © tenKsolar, Inc. 2015 All rights reserved C E TKS MKT 40203.02 C US XT-A Module 40OW 0 N O 10 N R E V is W �i N V N t Module Dimensions Landscape 77.40" (196.60 cm) 1.63" (4.14 cm) F�� TEE 0 O M O O n 54.90" (139.50 cm) O n _ Max Quantity per Pallet 2- Fully Loaded Pallet Weight 1775 Ibs (805 kg) Specifications and design are subject to change without notice. Read operating instructions carefully before using this product. Patents Pending �® © tenKsolar, Inc. 2015 All rights reserved TKS MKT 40006.01 C US C E OW q 0 F- d U YW Q Q D.. Z U H m f V) ¢ -r >- W zW-W CY a a �F - ¢aaLU x W D J Z0JEZ d • E ¢ L, F J CL O H O O d¢¢ Q O \ Z 0 J i m Cl Lr) CO - Ln O J v U7 f Z O LO " r, W W z 0� ,. O W q 0 F- 0 q 0 r-- W ¢ LnU F- - W03 Q q 0Y \ - _ F- m F- O W J ¢ 0 W W Q'ou F- 2'Sa L7 (U QW 3(W/)(4 ❑Lnv~X N U¢ W W W Z O W I- J Z ¢ W NUW (ZZW H WU -OP -+ ZO-S F- f n z(Yz 44 q 0 0 ¢ F- no UCLM v W"OWW U ¢ ¢n UOP W Z¢XiJiF= - f'¢ WZW QF-MM w F- OY HH X _>O L, M W 0X: Q_L, <OPWZJO N_ M ¢F- >-n- W¢ 3¢ Vi WF-F- F-m LOUT Q0J CZ¢ F-UW L,UP0P-U I YW W O<W ¢ZZ -i E O'W CL GY nL,U M--+Q W F-W�-+ E- I-¢F- W q7 0 F-zSIL O X 0 J d Z Z O Z q¢ W 0 ¢ W i-+¢W 0 - W OY HW W Yq WVi XW F- U USS z 2'UW F-0 F- q gQ¢ -F-F- W¢J Vim UqJ WZU Li d O'J W ZW ¢¢zF-L-W O 0 qq L�¢3 J WQDUF- w00' WZ L, OJ (4z NZ JO Wm>- U¢WW ¢J r--� F- J O J q - Z q W _>¢ ZF-0 Ow ZQ q" ZggO <(La: 0� "-w ZZJZW<O > W J (Y z W O J Q W W JU F-W WWO IL.Z¢f(L>- ¢X OW >F-q w S o_iw uwj SF- ¢¢ WWNN fU CL -d'� �-iOJ W J0-L,F- q _W JJ(4F-JO MC4"ZF-HCl) QF- ¢QY ¢F- z(L"¢Z" F- Q -- tZ' 00 F-F-7q OZX !YQ'OWaYu F--JZO 2O W WUi w C3z _ 0<0mOW2f, t-+W F-F- DL,--WZUU F-SO F- F- Q Q S F- q _ F- W - F- F- - _U¢ XXF-UJJ-QEJ Zq F- 2WJ _ U<0WPJ"WS¢WL,D OOCLYXF-ZLiW::r O-gSF-F--OJ �-+ WU-L�WOF- WW OV)J 0 zO. 0 JQCYzzJg0JW0ZCLX> �W QSWSF-¢OJO¢JSEOO_.OW L-ILM =Vi0E000W¢F-0u<ww - N (`') d' U i ,0 n W 6 N 0 N N (n O 2 Q = aauaa 0 U) W U U U) 0 O LLI F- F- rn Lil m Lr :2 I -Li D 3�:Z O 0 0 O J J W i¢ M Q M C) D --- _ OVERFLOW a cY cum ss RIP -RAP w/ / -� _ —--.------ _ ----- SKIMMER — — — —� STRUCTURE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. TOP OF ROCK ELEVATION 9i ct \ / X X989.0 X98!)e0 �92 \ 989.0% I1� \\\ 1 1 III j l(Z)I \p\ / LEGEND 1 NS zCZErrMrrrrrrrrurrrr rrrrrc��r.arrrww r�irrrrrrw.ww.nrrrrww � � wwrrwwwwwwwwwwwwwrww �'� wwww�I•wwwwwwwwwwwrwr \� rwwww.arwrwwrwwr.crw �rrr.rrrrrrc-:�crrrr • •>trrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr • r.�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrwrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr���wrrrrrrrrrrrw� �j,� .rrrrrr���rrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrr���crrr �1 rarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr •r� rrr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr M I I I + / I rrrrct•rwc�c���w�rrwn rwwrrrrrrrrrrrwrrrwwT. AAVE ,lip ft DWAR rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ' .rrrc�c�wrrrrrrrrrrr .................... �, .................... O rwwrwrrrrrrrrrrrrwrw .................... rrrrrrrrrrrrrrw�c�o� �•�� 'O ..wrrr.w.��rc�..rrrw � O LOT LINE EROSION CONTROL SILT -FENCE SILT FENCE 990 PROPOSED CONTOUR E,f' i1+A Samwn+ Rmi FI9iC RiEll FIHW: r-rur EXISTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR sum r�-rosrvm � soy ar roar. auNOTr EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR - +r Iw X 000.0 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION +o a wa saraxo enx I y, °pw'6 X 000.0 EXISTING SPOT ELEVA77ON a�a esvar maz a°r� SiANDNtO DETAIL DRAINAGE ARROW +emo+ wn+ +utnL eaou. PROPOSED GRAVEL ea rvai xotex PROPOSED BITUMINOUS +. amscr No ntww ra+cE Nim aa+ Draw eaxr ao ea+e.E sarxr a+d x�srm. z naam s+aaort avu sc ottoswa PROPOSED WOODFIBER BLANKET ro ix wu nwr eu xor re M ars-m[ Na av+ a a aawwxnr aa. y r � � ec i sanc —0 O— IXlS77NG FENCE aa+mea m wua� rann Esrrawv. SHE OHE— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE -® EROSION CONTROL 54LE CHECKS 0 40 80 120 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET LANDSCAPE PLAN POSSIBILI TIES. BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PONDERORA PINE aSCOTCH PINE O REVISIONS 11HZE BY l hereby certi�that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a did Professional Engineer under laws of the ate of Minnesota. Signo 7hore P. Meyer Di 1119/06 Reg a. 621E INC.DATE MEYER-ROHL/N, C ENGINEERS - LAND SURVEYORS �r' I I I I Hwy. 25N., Buffalo, MN 55313 Ph. (763) 682-1781 Fax (763) 682-9492 7 28/ 03 / RECORD PLANS DATE BOOKPAGE HOWWAL SCALE l p+M ` 40 Poet vERRCAI. — l w N A feat 1W street is other than 2204, 9n bile. WILLOW SUBSTATION WRIGHT-HENNEPIN ELECTRIC Medina, Minnesota RLE No. 02500 Is F Mist. REwsroNs DRG t�a REVISIONS PER CLIENT DLS 04114106 REWSKINS PER CLIENT TURN DRAWN BY DRG SHEET OF I SHEETS oa I9 OB RENSED PAD AREA AND NOTES MEN DESrHEO By DRG CHECKED BY TPM — — GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN — — \ J1 \ 1 SHIRE( - ZONING 1P RA!�ROAI� — 04-118-23 31 0001 ( - _-T''" _...,_ _990 -- _.."_ SOO LINE RAILROAD (/ $p i / i2 5 -- REAL ESTATE DEPT., SUJ"E_�4 .SOO 5D1 M4ROU3 LTfS dvS IS -art sus T L q N 8- 2 0 1 - I.__/- 7` \\ \ \ W /�� 800 T ECN 1 CDROP\ELECTRi� / j / ."_ wo- -� - \v \ I DRAINAGE AND /// / ' k � i RaCRFOR", ' 553373 UTILITY EASEMENT- -\-\\ \11§ � l 1 / } pvv�R[LITY, E�AsEMENT- K,� \P54tip X�C NE,P/ Al ° I 1 // Ilo� �1//ll/// / �� �\ �iA \\\A\v\ lA n \ v v I J C101 NG WATT TO ER I I 1 \ 1X v } 1\ 5 \ \ i oX/STINIG WATER TOWER EASEMENT TdR �Db&U ENt NO. /6�38793 V A�Vo \� EXISTING ING� S ND EGf�ESS\EAS�EMEI�IT� \� \ : A � �� \ �\ t � � � � � � � � � � PER`DOGUMENiT O! 673879 hr _ _.__� _.�_ EJ JF <7QR � \\�RA NAGE A(V� \ w a it T L �A!�EMENT"-�z��JCC cal \\\o 0,90 I 10, P16NEER I � TRAIi 09-1,18-23 12 D003wo \ — \ 09-118-23 02 ✓ 1 / RONALD S.�USICH \ \\\\ l \ , / DOUGLAS DICK SON / �� 2715 PIONEER RAIL Z , 1NG RR 1000 2625 PION TRAi p ((..",J/� MEDINA, MN 553�4Q V Qi� i �� �� �AMEL, MN 5 0 y� \` Q4-118-23 41 0002 -XLOW. POINT-LLC-- 4352 WILLOW DR HAMEL, MN 55340 go— CL a� oD Z III N 0 100 200 300 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET Cfl4 1" -23 41 0003 SWA SON `SAND COMPANY 1430(q WILLOW DRIVE HAMEL, AWN �5,i340 L DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY MEDINA PARKS 2nd ADD GROSS AREA OUTLOT A AND OUTLOT B: WETLAND AREA: 3,864,671.0 sf 88.72 acres 1,271171.0 sf 29.18 acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE. Business / Office Park EXISTING ZONING: BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING: BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT PROPOSED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: Height Property Setback Front Side Rear 30' 35' (bldg with sprinkler system) 50' 50' 50' Setback From Residential 100' ( without berm ) Wetland Setback Wetland Setback (less than loc.) 25' Wetland Setback (greater than loc.) 50' Parking Setback From a Commercial Zone From a Residential Zone 25' 50' �L` T AREA=35.53 AC. ZONING BP DRAINAGE AND \J4 �, =-UTILITY EASEMENT------ 0 o \\ DRAINAGE AND \--UTILIT \ EASEMENTS--� WILLI 2,522 PION09�118-2ETTATTEE\�\\ \ -�A\\��A V{� lZO IQI//� I I I ( �yo�\ HAifEL. M 55�0 / 09-r8-23 1 i V� / % (I i i ��\ / 1 \ \ Vm JAMES J. RENIER, TRUSTEE 3392 PIONEER TRAIL \ HAMEL, MN 55340 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Outlot A and Outlot B, MEDINA PARKS SECOND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. LOCATION: Part of Sect. 4, Twsp. 118, Rng. 23 Hennepin County, Minnesota 0 Z U � S J NLU m � � N 0 W LO N O W 0 N 2 DEVELOPER: MEDINA WILLOW BUSINESS PARK, LLO 1522 Medina Road Medina, Mn 55340 Michael J. Leuer (763) 286-1441 o co Z 'a � U z c' � w 0 ti a 3 O O 0 { O 03 W w O O p U FILE NO. 00274 SHEET OF ��--- /\ Soo 91  \f`- -�� WETLAND //��/// _�� ����\ / ��'^ 0 40 80 120 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET J �� ' - -----EDGE OF WEI---- ' I \_-_-EaGEaFWETLANa IIII\I \\\ 1\\\\ /1111111111 I/// i�� \` 1\\\\\\\ ' IIIII I I11 W, /I I IIII/ /// / ?�� �� \\\ \ II I \ At //// 111/0 rll \  �� jTo EDGE OF WEnAND --------------- ��I --T ^\_ \ZI ��0 4111��l l \ \ I \ _ r-EDGE OF WETLAND Jr I ���� By 1��a 1s-1/s2/a I. REwsroNs DRG l hereby certiWhat this plan, specification, or report INC.DATE 7128103 aEcoRD PLANS WE. WILLOW SUBSTATION FltE No. 02500 REwsroNS PER CUENT DLS was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and MEYER ROHL/N, C 04114106 REWSIONS PER CUENT ON that I am a duly tensed Professional Engineer under DRAwN er ORG Boon PAGE WRTCHT-HENNEPIN ELECTRTC 04119106 REVISED PAD AREA AND NOTES NRN the laws of the ate of Minnesota. ENGINEERS - LAND SURVEYORS % SHEET Medina, Minnesota Signo 7hore P. Meyer I I I I Hwy. 25N., Buffalo, MN 55313 DIED B" ORG NOR/ZONTAL SCALE 1 k h ` 40 Poet OF Ph. (763) 682-1781 Fax (763) 682-9492 ����RDCAL SOaE 1 Inch NIA feat 1 Date 4119106 Reg o. 6218 c 1mc er TPM *If street is other than 22.M, . bGTaGak GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SNEE,s Agenda Item # 8D MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: May 28, 2015 MEETING: June 2, 2015 City Council SUBJ: Villas at Medina Country Club -Storm sewer taxing district — Public Hearing Background The City's practice is to require that homeowners' associations maintain stormwater improvements within developments. This is formalized through an agreement that is recorded against each property. Additionally, the City's practice is to establish Storm Sewer Improvement Taxing District over development sites as a "back-up plan" if the homeowner's association does not maintain stormwater improvements. The City has taken this step in all recent residential subdivisions, including The Reserve, The Fields of Medina (and West), The Enclave at Medina and The Enclave at Brockton. Prior to considering the establishment of such a district, the City Council is required to hold a Public Hearing. Notice of this public hearing was published and sent for the June 2, 2015 meeting. Staff Recommendation Following the Public Hearing, staff recommends that the City Council take the following action: Motion to adopt the ordinance establishing Villas at Medina Country Club storm sewer improvement tax district. Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication of the ordinance by title and summary. Attachments 1. Ordinance establishing Villas at Medina Country Club storm sewer improvement tax district 2. Resolution authorizing publication of the ordinance by title and summary. Villas at Medina Country Club Page 1 of 1 June 2, 2015 Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District City Council Meeting CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE VILLAS AT MEDINA COUNTRY CLUB STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT TAX DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Background: Findings. 1.01. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 444.16 — 444.21 (the "Act") to establish a storm sewer improvement tax district in connection with the Villas at Medina Country Club subdivision (the "District") to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related facilities within the District and to acquire, construct, maintain and improve stormwater holding areas and ponds outside of the District which are for the benefit of the District in accordance with the Act and to levy a tax on all taxable property within the District to finance such activities. 1.02. It is found and determined that it is in the best interests of Medina and its storm water management program that the District be established. The District shall be comprised of the land legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section II. Establishment: Authorizations. 2.01. The Villas at Medina Country Club Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District is hereby established. The City shall have all powers and authority conferred by the Act in the operation and financing of the activities of the District. 2.02. The boundaries of the District include all property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and are depicted in the map on Exhibit B, attached hereto. 2.03. The City Administrator -Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Auditor and Recorder of Hennepin County. Section III. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication and the recording of the plat of Villas at Medina Country Club in Hennepin County. Ordinance No. ### June 2, 2015 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this 2nd day of June, 2015. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk Published in the Crow River News on this day of , Ordinance No. ### 2 June 2, 2015 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of property Contained within boundaries of Villas at Medina Country Club Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Lots 1-28, Block 1, Lots 30-44, Block 1, and Outlot A, Villas at Medina Country Club, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. Ordinance No. ### 3 June 2, 2015 EXHIBIT B Location of Villas at Medina Country Club Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Ordinance No. ### 4 June 2, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2015-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing the Villas at Medina Country Club storm sewer improvement tax district; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is four pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city administrator -clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety: Public Notice The city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing the Villas at Medina Country Club storm sewer improvement tax district. This district will apply over the property being developed as the Villas at Medina Country Club residential neighborhood and would allow the City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain, and improve stormwater facilities within the neighborhood if the homeowners' association fails to do SO. The full text of Ordinance No. ### is available from the city administrator -clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city administrator -clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in his office at city hall for public inspection and that he post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 2015-## June 2, 2015 Dated: June 2, 2015. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2015-## June 2, 2015 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: May 28, 2015 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates June 2, 2015 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) Medina Country Club Site Plan — The Medina Country Club has requested a site plan review for construction of a new maintenance facility to replace the existing barn which will be demolished as part of the Villas project. The applicant also proposes to construct small restroom facilities on the course. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their April 14 meeting and recommended approval. The Council reviewed on May 5 and May 19 and tabled, requesting more information related to the proposed metal exterior. B) Aldi Site Plan and Variance — 3522 Sioux Drive — Aldi has requested approval to construct a 18,000 square foot grocery store at the southeast corner of Highway 55 and Sioux Drive. The applicant has also requested a variance to exceed the maximum 25% hardcover limitation in the shoreland overlay district of Elm Creek. The Planning Commission reviewed at their April 14 and May 12 meetings and recommended denial because the applicant did not meet the criteria for granting variances. The applicant is considering means to address the concerns of the Planning Commission and staff intends to present that application to the City Council on June 2. C) Wright -Hennepin Solar Panels — WH has requested a conditional use permit for the installation of a solar garden approximately an acre in area at their substation on Willow Drive, south of Highway 55. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing at their May 12 meeting. Following the hearing the Commission recommended approval of the request. Staff intends to present to the City Council on June 2. D) Wealshire LLC Comp Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Site Plan Review — Wealshire, LLC has requested a site plan review for construction of an 173,000 square feet memory care facility. The request also includes a rezoning from RR-UR to Business Park and an Interim Use Permit to permit continued agricultural use of the portion of the property not proposed to be developed. The Met Council has also approved of the previous Comp Plan amendment. The Planning Commission meeting reviewed the rezoning, site plan review and interim use permit at the February 10 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. The City Council reviewed at the May 19 meeting and directed staff to prepare approval documents. These will be presented at the June 16 meeting. E) Goddard School Site Plan Review — PJ Norman LLC has requested Site Plan Review approval to construct a new building to house a Goddard School at 345 Clydesdale Trail (next to Caribou Coffee). The matter is scheduled for a public hearing at the June 9 Planning Commission meeting. F) Stonegate Conservation Design Subdivision — west of Deerhill, East of Homestead. The applicant has requested PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for a conservation design subdivision of 42 lots on 170 gross acres. Staff is conducting a preliminary review, and the matter is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing at the July 14 Planning Commission meeting. G) Buehler Plat — Robert Buehler has requested approval of a plat to separate 2782 Willow Drive from adjacent property. The parcels were a single lot and a previous owner sold portions of the lot to two separate buyers. The applicant seeks to subdivide the property to create a buildable lot, and the other portion of the property would be platted as an outlot. Staff is conducting a preliminary review, and the application will be scheduled for a Hearing when deemed complete, potentially at the July 14 Planning Commission meeting. Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 June 2, 2015 City Council Meeting H) Villas at Medina Country Club Final Plat — East of CR116, south of Shawnee Woods Road — Rachel Contracting has requested final approval of a subdivision to include 43 single family homes along the west and north of the Medina Golf and Country Club. The Council granted final plat approval at the May 5 meeting. Staff will work with the applicant on the conditions of approval. I) Enclave at Brockton S`" Addition — Lennar has requested final plat approval for the next phase of the Enclave at Brockton project. This phase is proposed to include 38 lots in the south and west portion of the site. The Council adopted a resolution of approval at the March 17 meeting. Staff will work with the applicant on the conditions of approval. J) Wakefield Valley Farm — 3385 County Road 24 — The applicant has requested final plat approval. City Council granted preliminary plat approval during the fall of last year. The City Council granted final plat approval at the March 3 meeting. Staff will work with applicant on conditions of approval. K) Dominium Affordable Rental Townhomes, Soiney Right-of-way Vacation, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery, Hamel Place —The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. L) Woods of Medina, Capital Knoll— these preliminary plats have been approved and staff is awaiting a final plat application M) Woodland Hill Preserve, Enclave at Brockton r, Hamel Haven, Morrison lot split, Three Rivers/Reimer Rearrangement subdivision — These subdivisions have all received final approval. Staff is working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before construction begins. N) Monger Animal Structure Setback Variance — 1272 Homestead Trail — Todd and Katie Monger have requested a variance to reduce the required setback for an animal structure from 150 feet to 75 feet. The Planning Commission reviewed at their April 14 meeting and recommended approval. The Council adopted a resolution of approval at the May 19 meeting, and the application will now be closed. Other Proiects A) Cable Buildout Analysis — staff met with Mediacom's construction department related to the City's preferred buildout in 2015. They informed staff that the existing system could not support buildout as desired by the City, but has to proceed in more of a linear fashion. Mediacom submitted their proposed buildout for 2015. Staff has requested the 2015 and 2016 proposed buildout map. Mediacom has agreed to allow the City until the June 16th meeting to review the buildout map. B) Site Plan Review, Administrative Review — following the feedback at the Business Forum, staff intends to present an ordinance for Planning Commission and City Council review which would allow staff to administratively approve certain improvements on commercial property (parking lot expansions, additions, small accessory structures) without needing to go through formal hearings with the Planning Commission and Council. Staff intends to present the ordinance at the June 9th Planning Commission meeting. C) CR116/Highway 55 — staff will meet with representatives from McDonalds on Friday to discuss Hennepin County's plans for the intersection. D) Council Chambers Electronics — Staff took part in a meeting related to the AV equipment upgrade for the City Council chambers Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 June 2, 2015 City Council Meeting MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT G T O MEDINA 4. MEMORANDUM TO: City Administrator Scott Johnson and City Council FROM: Director Edgar J. Belland DATE: May 29, 2015 RE: Department Updates Officers Recognized at the Chamber Luncheon Sergeant Nelson and Officer Converse were recognized at the I-94 West Chamber of Commerce First Responder Luncheon held at the Medina Recreation Center on May 13th. Sergeant Nelson was recognized for his actions related to a critical incident where he took action to save a deputy's life on December 4, 2014. Officer Converse was recognized for his lifesaving efforts on a medical emergency back on November 10, 2014, using the defibrillator. The event was well attended; the opening comments came from our distinguished Mayor Mitchell. It was a great event. 600 Clydesdale Traill 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 p:763-473-9209 f:763-473.8858 non -emergency: 763 -5 25.6210 Emergency 9-1-1 Planning Summit — Underage Drinking On May 19th, I attended a planning summit on underage drinking in Plymouth discussing the challenges facing our communities concerning the underage drinking and over serving of customers. There were several presentations from public safety personnel on the different programs out there addressing the issues. Currently, Medina addresses our serving issues on two fronts through training and enforcement. We offer annual training for all our liquor establishments' employees and management on proper identification procedures and on the recognition of intoxicated persons and the right to refuse service to those individuals. We also do compliance checks on all liquor establishments twice a year. Thank You to the Mothers of Preschoolers (MOPS) The Mother of Preschoolers (MOPS) group out of Holy Name of Jesus Church brought over a basket of bottled water and baked goods for the officers thanking them for their service. On May 26th, I stopped in at their meeting and personally thanked them for their kind gesture. Their actions were greatly appreciated by the whole department. Bike Patrol I have officers interested in bike patrols to increase community policing. Three Rivers Park District Police is allowing us to use two of their bikes to test the program this summer. You may see some of our officers on bikes in the future. Patrol by Sergeant Jason Nelson Patrol Activities For the dates of May 13th to May 27, 2015, our officers issued 53 citations and 86 warnings for various traffic infractions. There were a total of two driving while impaired arrests, five traffic accidents, five medicals and eight alarms. On May 16, 2015, Officer Boecker was dispatched to a person sleeping in a vehicle at the intersection of Highway 55 and County Road 101. The vehicle and driver were located. The driver was found to be extremely intoxicated and was arrested for DWI. The driver has several prior DWI and this case will be charged as a felony DWI. On May 17, 2015, Officer Converse was dispatched to Loram where an employee was reporting that there were several people inside the building with guns. Upon arrival, Office Converse and other officers located the company's president and several teenagers who were playing zombies and making videos. The president of the company stated that he was unaware anyone was working in the building. On May 18, 2015, Officer Converse took a fraud report from a citizen who reported that someone had filed a 2014 tax return under their name and needed to file a report. On May 18, 2015, Officer McGill took a report of cloned credit cards being used at Office Max. Owner of the credit card lives several hundred miles away. Victim reported that his credit card had been used at the Office Max in Medina; however, he had his credit card with him. Case forwarded to Investigations. This is a very big problem all over the metro and there are hundreds of cases of cloned credit cards being used every month. On May 21, 2015, while on patrol, Officer Jessen located a vehicle spinning in circles in the Spurzem Public Access. The driver was found to be intoxicated and was arrested for DWI. On May 25, 2015, Officer Converse escorted the Military Color Guard from Hamel Legion Park to St. Anne's Cemetery. Criminal Investigations by Investigator Charmane Domino Received a child protection report of a baby that was born with illegal drugs in its system. The hospital made the report and the child was released to foster care in another city. The parents are reported to live in Medina. A pallet of soffit and fascia were taken from a house under construction. No suspects at this time. I took a report of a known suspect opening a cell phone account in victim's name leaving the victim with a large unpaid bill. The bill had gone to collections and the victim had it reported on their credit. A cloned credit card was used to purchase over $400 worth of merchandise at a local store. Surveillance footage shows an unidentified male making the purchase. Investigation to continue. Open cases currently under investigation: 14 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: May 27, 2015 MEETING: June 2, 2015 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS Public Works has been working on the following areas in town preparing for sealcoating and our 2015 paving projects: o Foxberry Farms: We have been working on manholes and are now lowering some of the catch basins so water can drain off the streets in some areas. We will be pouring some curb in these areas and sealcoating will follow. o Bridgewater: Charles Cudd will be doing the final curb replacement work on the Bridgewater development next week. The City crew will be repaving a small area of settlement around the center island on the east end of the bridge. o Tamarack Drive: The road has been slowly settling into the wetland for many years, so the PW crew will be adding some blacktop to the low areas both south of County Road 24 and north of Medina Road; then we will be adding a leveling course for about a 1000' through the swamp area. The thought is to hold the road together for the next five years and budget for a project to raise the road in the future when we next overlay. We replaced the culvert just north of Medina Road last week and when we have completed all the repairs, we will be sealcoating the entire stretch from the Orono line to BlackfootTrail. o Independence Beach: Public Works replaced a culvert on Lakeshore Drive and will be replacing about 200' of 36" pipe from the Ardmore Creek along Lakeshore Drive to the outlet on Lake Independence. Next will be the pond excavation and the curb and storm pipe that is part of the retrofit project on Lake Ardmore. I am hoping to get started on the paving on the north end of the project in June and the south end will be determined as we progress with our projects in that area of the subdivision. o 600 Clydesdale Trail: Part of the original project required us to remove some of the hardcover in front of the Public Works break room. We have removed the asphalt and will be pouring the new curb next week. We are also looking at milling and overlaying the entrance portion of the parking lot as you enter from Clydesdale Trail. The pavement is in bad shape and needs to be addressed. Along with the paving, we will be sealcoating a portion of the parking lot that is in need of maintenance. I have budgeted funds for next year and will continue moving forward until we complete the work that needs to be done on the large parking lot. o Tower Drive: The project is in full swing. The first pond has been excavated and utilities will be starting on Monday, June 1st. In the excavation of the second pond there were some test holes dug on the Raskob property and we found some Page 1 of 1 asbestos tiles in the building rubble. We are currently getting some quotes on the removal of the material. We did budget for some removal, but it remains to be seen if we will be within that budget. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • The resolution and grant agreement for the Ardmore Avenue Stormwater Retrofit Water Quality Improvement Project is in your packet for approval. • WSB is currently working on a new bid package for the well #8 production well and pump house improvements. We are anticipating up to 1000 Gallons per minute on this well. This would be a great find for the future needs of the City's water supply and would reduce the need for many of the wells that were originally proposed in the future. Geology is never a given and how one well effects another can limit how we utilize them, but we are very confident this is a good well for our needs. PARKS/TRAILS • The annual Park tour was done on May 201h. We visited Hamel Legion Park, Morningside Park, Hunter Lions Park, Lakeshore Park, and Maple Park. There were a lot of ideas and suggestions along the way. Commissioners were reminded that Public Works has limited staff and things are done on a priority basis. • The Park at Fields of Medina construction is scheduled to begin early June and completed mid -July. I will be following up soon to make sure things are progressing. • Public Works has been watering all the trees that were recently planted in the park and will continue to do so as the summer heats up. MISCELLANEOUS • Linda is ordering two signs to help with guiding people to the upstairs meeting room at the new building — one to hang below the smaller PW Entrance Sign along the sidewalk and one that will hang down from the ceiling in the hallway pointing to the stairs/elevator. • We are taking delivery of our new tandem plow truck next week. The total price of the truck body was $116,067, with a trade-in value of $35,000 from the 2000 truck. The truck is going straight to Towmaster to have the dump box and plow equipment installed. Towmaster has assured me that the plow equipment will be installed before the snow plowing season is upon us. Page 2 of 2 ORDER CHECKS May 20, 2015 —June 2, 2015 42871 ANDERSON, ROSS...................................................................$150.00 42872 BOPPINEDI, VINUTHA............................................................. $150.00 42873 HUQ, MAHBUBUL....................................................................$225.00 42874 PRABHAKARAN, PRASANTH..................................................... $250.00 42875 SINNING, JASON..................................................................... $150.00 42876 JOHNSON, MICHAEL............................................................... $150.00 42877 US HOME CORP................................................................. $20,000.00 42878 MARK J TRAUT WELLS, INC................................................ $26,621.37 42879 MATTAMY MPLS PRTNSHP.................................................. $60,000.00 42880 OLIMB, KARLA........................................................................ $500.00 42881 PRIMROSE SCHOOL................................................................$210.00 42882 AMERICAN MADE ELECTION EQUIP ...................................... $3,575.00 42883 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO ....................................................... $306.05 42884 BAILEY NURSERIES, INC...................................................... $3,559.50 42885 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC................................................. $81,067.00 42886 CENTURYLINK........................................................................ $644.00 42887 COUNTRYSIDE CAFE............................................................... $150.43 42888 ECM PUBLISHERS INC............................................................. $250.03 42889 GO 2 HAMEL LLC.................................................................... $493.72 42890 GRAINGER................................................................................ $93.72 42891 HAMEL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT.......................................... $63,778.75 42892 HENN COUNTY TAXPAYER SVCS DEPT.......................................$52.70 42893 HENRYS WATERWORKS INC................................................. $3,679.27 42894 HOLIDAY FLEET...................................................................... $134.24 42895 I-94 WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ......................................... $40.00 42896 ISELER DEMOLITION INC................................................... $15,800.00 42897 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED ...................................... $18,796.95 42898 LARKIN AUTO......................................................................... $227.84 42899 CITY OF LONG LAKE............................................................ $2,624.00 42900 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE ....................................................... $598.61 42901 MARCO INC.............................................................................. $97.29 42902 MARK J TRAUT WELLS, INC.................................................. $4,717.38 42903 MCMA-MN CTY/CO MGMT ASSOC............................................ $116.40 42904 MEDINA MOBIL, INC............................................................... $100.00 42905 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY............................................... $100.00 42906 MN SAFETY COUNCIL INC....................................................... $800.00 42907 MOTHERS MOTORS/LORETTOTOWING...................................$126.25 42908 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC........................................................ $190.72 42909 OFFICE DEPOT....................................................................... $192.82 42910 RANDY'S SANITATION INC................................................... $2,885.02 42911 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC...................................... $7,164.07 42912 STREICHER'S.......................................................................... $297.93 42913 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC........................................... $549.64 42914 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL.............................................................. $504.90 42915 TEGRETE CORP.................................................................... $1,358.64 42916 TIMESAVER OFFSITE.............................................................. $298.00 42917 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE ............................................... $1,192.51 42918 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO .................................................. $1,465.06 42919 KAUR, BALJIT.........................................................................$500.00 42920 STEVENS, HEATHER................................................................ $250.00 Total Checks $327,184.81 Electronic Payments May 15, 2015 — May 28, 2015 003162E PR PERA............................................................................ $13,902.50 003163E PR FED/FICA...................................................................... $15,160.44 003164E PR MN Deferred Comp.......................................................... $1,980.00 003165E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA.................................................... $3,175.35 003166E SELECT ACCOUNT................................................................... $702.00 003167E CITY OF MEDINA......................................................................$18.00 003168E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL.............................................$20.00 003169E KONICA MINOLTA................................................................... $168.48 003170E XCEL ENERGY...................................................................... $8,426.86 003171E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN......................................... $1,806.85 003172E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC........................................................... $219.90 003173E DELTA DENTAL.................................................................... $2,348.34 003174E VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES ................................................... $140.23 003175E PITNEY BOWES...................................................................... $123.00 Total Electronic Checks $48,191.95 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT May 20, 2015 506413 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L..................................................... $1,269.15 506414 BARNHART, ERIN A.............................................................. $1,865.68 506415 BELLAND, EDGAR J.............................................................. $2,524.22 506416 BOECKER, KEVIN D.............................................................. $2,343.39 506417 CONVERSE, KEITH A ............................................................ $2,088.33 506418 DINGMANN, IVAN W............................................................ $1,937.93 506419 DOMINO, CHARMANE........................................................... $1,737.98 506420 ENDE, JOSEPH..................................................................... $1,356.11 506421 FINKE, DUSTIN D................................................................. $2,116.36 506422 GALLUP, JODI M.................................................................. $1,590.31 506423 GLEASON, JOHN M............................................................... $2,124.51 506424 GREGORY, THOMAS............................................................. $1,859.31 506425 HALL, DAVID M.................................................................... $1,974.08 506426 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S........................................................... $2,019.84 506427 JOHNSON, SCOTT T............................................................. $2,162.88 506428 KLAERS, ANNE M.................................................................... $612.44 506429 LANE, LINDA....................................................................... $1,465.16 506430 LEUER, GREGORYJ.............................................................. $2,253.04 506431 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R.................................................... $1,411.39 506432 NELSON,JASON................................................................... $2,231.72 506433 NISSEN, JACQUEL R................................................................ $450.47 506434 PETERSON, DEBRA A ........................................................... $1,545.17 506435 REINKING, DEREK M............................................................ $1,853.15 506436 SCHERER, STEVEN T............................................................ $2,225.71 506437 VIEAU, CECILIA M................................................................ $1,175.80 506438 VINCK, JOHN J.................................................................... $1,761.20 506439 WENANDE, BRANDON 5.......................................................... $553.42 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $46,508.75