Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2015-12-09 packet NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING AND TENTATIVE AGENDA' ' } CO:sir�i�0il0ik irk City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Wednesday,December 9, 2015 —5:30 p.m. John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street Boone/Bancroft Conference Room TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Approval of Agenda(as printed or amended) 3. Approval of Minutes for the November 12, 2015, Special Meeting 4. Demolition Application a. 1119 Jefferson St 5. Old Business a. Historic City of Jefferson Proposed Demolition Ordinance 6. HPC Business a. Missouri 2016 Statewide Preservation Honor Award Nominations 7. Dates to Remember a. Next Meeting January 12, 2016 8. Adjournment Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at(573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act.Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call 573-634-6410 for information regarding agenda items City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Minutes Thursday, November 12, 2015 City Annex, 427 Monroe Street Jefferson City MO Commission Members Present Attendance Record Bill Case 9 of 9 Mary Schantz 8 of 9 Kevin Kelly 9 of 9 Terri Rademan 4 of 9 Jane Moore 7 of 9 Brent Hemphill 4 of 9 Art Hernandez 8 of 9 Sarah Hoeller 2 of 9 Doug Record 7 of 9 Commission Members Absent None Council Liaison Present Laura Ward Staff Present Jayme Abbott Janice McMillan Guests Carolyn Bening, Historic City of Jefferson Brian Bernskoetter, Jefferson City Area Board of Realtors Tammy Boeschen, Historic City of Jefferson Cathy Bordner, Historic City of Jefferson Michelle Brooks, News Tribune Fred Brown, Historic City of Jefferson Heath Clarkston, Home Builders Association Peter DeSimone Paul Graham, Historic City of Jefferson Lois Hildenbrand, Historic City of Jefferson Jim Kreider, MRTA Kevin McHugh, Historic City of Jefferson Janet Maurer, Historic City of Jefferson Rick Mihalevich, City Council Jim Penfold, , Historic City of Jefferson Mark Schreiber, City Council Jenny Smith, Historic City of Jefferson Kay Snartellaro, Historic City of Jefferson Pam Taylor, Historic City of Jefferson Steve Veile, Historic City of Jefferson Jim Wisch, WAVCO Call to Order: Vice Chair Bill Case called the meeting to order at 5:35 pm. Approval of Agenda: Bill Case asked the Commissioners to review the amended agenda and to recommend any changes needed. Kevin Kelly moved the amended agenda be approved as printed. Terri Rademan seconded the motion. Motion carried. Approval of Minutes: Bill Case asked the Commissioners to review the September 17, 2015 Special Meeting minutes and offer corrections if needed. Jane Moore moved the minutes be approved. Sarah Hoeller seconded the motion. Motion carried. Old Business a. Historic City of Jefferson Proposed Demolition Ordinance — Jayme Abbott began by providing the Commission and public a general overview of the process for the proposal and timeline for the proposal's proceeding after the Commission has completed its work on the draft proposal. Presentations were made by members of the Historic City of Jefferson (HCJ). The presenters included: Steve Veile, Past President of HCJ; Paul Graham, HCJ attorney; Cathy Bordner, HCJ member; and, Tammy Boeschen, President of HCJ. Steve Veile presented a slide show entitled: Local Living Landmarks. He discussed HCJ's involvement with historic preservation in the past and their continued interest in the issue. Mr. Veile asked the Commission to vote tonight to approve the concept of the proposal. Paul Graham provided an overview of the proposed flowchart outlining how applications for complete demolition would be handled. Mr. Graham discussed the concept of the proposal and the attempt on the part of HCJ to protect property owner's rights and to assure that at the end of the process there was clear title for the property. His testimony focused on the two major provisions or changes of this proposal which were giving the Commission the power to say no to an application for demolition and the "no" would have teeth and secondly to give everyone (owner, public and stakeholders) an opportunity to have their say. Related to the addition of the word "complete" before demolition, and what HCJ felt the definition of "complete" should be, Mr. Graham said that was up to others to decide. When asked by the Commission about the increased cost for the Commission to carry out the public notice requirements of the proposal Mr. Graham indicated that HCJ wrote the proposal in a way as to not increase costs or requirements beyond other already existing code requirements. The new section of the ordinance, the "purpose" section added the word "and structures". HCJ was not aware of what this was referring to or if a structure is different that a building. No definition was recommended. Cathy Bordner provided the Commission with statistics from the past five years about the number of demolition applications the Commission had considered, the number approved or denied and the number of denied applications that were demolished anyway. Tammy Boeschen described the value of historic preservation on MO cities like St. Charles, Ste. Genevieve, Hannibal and others. She discussed HCJs review of other city demolition ordinances as they drafted this proposal. Tammy discussed ordinances that use a historical district designation to determine what building must go through a process for review prior to demolition. All speakers for HCJ reiterated their goal was to give the Commission the power to say no to an application and that "no" had strength of law behind it. Mr. Case asked if there were others wanting to testify on the proposal. Brian Bernskoetter, representing the Board of Realtors testified that they had issues with the wording of the proposal, the additional time that will be required for home owners to take action on their property and the concept. He testified that it was the Board of Realtors belief that this proposal creates uncertainty and that owners will be more likely to simply take no action and allow a home to deteriorate. He questioned if the Commission members had the qualifications to carry out their functions required in the proposal. Mr. Bernskoetter recommended that the Commission/City Council develop a set of criteria for a property to be considered historic and then allow for voluntary registration on a list of such properties. Such a list would give a potential buyer knowledge up front that the property is historic and any plans to demolish the building would require additional expense and time on the part of the owner. He cited the Columbia MO ordinance indicating that the Columbia Commission had an "advisory" role and decisions were made at the City Council level. In addition, the qualifications of Commission members were spelled out. Mr. Heath Clarkston, representing the Home Builders Association, testified that they liked the concept of having historic districts with an overlay of enhanced demolition requirements. He felt taking a city wide approach added burden and time to owners that clearly do not have an historic property but have one that is 50 years old or older. He felt there was a middle ground that could be reached and encouraged the Commission to look closely at definitions. With no others wishing to testify, Mr. Case asked the Commission for their thoughts. Terri Rademan began by making a motion to approve the concept and move the proposal forward to the next step. This motion generated discussion about the process, and the role for the city attorney's, the City Council and the Public Works and Planning Committee. Art Hernandez stated for the record that he felt the information provided was informative and he agrees with the HCJ that the HPC's ordinance has no teeth. However, as a property owner and attorney he has concerns that this proposal oversteps an individual property owners rights. He felt that the Commission had the right and obligation to continue discussion about the proposal. After lengthy discussions between the Commission and staff, Art Hernandez moved that the vote on this proposal be tabled until a work session of the HPC has determined how it plans to move forward with this proposal as provided to the Commission by HCJ. Motion was seconded by Brent Hemphill. Motion carried. Demolition Applications a. 806 Jefferson — This property is owned by Riversong. Art Hernandez moved that the Commission determined that there will be no historic properties affected by the demolition and the permit is approved. Jane Moore seconded the motion. Motion carried. b. 623-625 W McCarty — This property is owned by Gene Schneider. The Commission discussed what appeared from the picture to be evidence that the owner had already begun the process of demolition, the possibility that the house could be considered of a type period or method of construction that would make it historic. Brent Hemphill moved that there will be no historic properties affected by the demolition and the permit be approved. Art seconded the motion. Motion carried with three no votes from; Terri Rademan, Doug Record and Sarah Hoeller c. 1119 Jefferson St.- This property is owned by the Memorial Baptist Church and had been given a permit to demolish in 2009. However, the church did not act upon that demolition permit and continued to utilize the building. After discussion Art Hernandez moved that there will be no historic properties affected by the demolition and the permit is approved by the commission. Brent Hemphill seconded the motion. The motion failed by a vote of three yes and six no. Votes in the affirmative were from Art Hernandez, Brent Hemphill and Mary Schantz. d. 1108 Oak St. — This property is owned by Capitol Region Medical Center. Doug Record moved that there will be historic properties affected by the demolition and the permit is approved by the commission. Motion was seconded by Kevin Kelly. Motion carried with one no vote by Art Hernandez. e. 1110 Oak St. - This property is owned by Capitol Region Medical Center. Terri Rademan moved that there will be historic properties affected by the demolition and the permit is approved by the commission. Motion was seconded by Doug Record. Motion carried with one no vote by Art Hernandez. f. 1112 Oak St. - This property is owned by Capitol Region Medical Center. Jane Moore moved that there will be historic properties affected by the demolition and the permit is approved by the commission. Motion was seconded by Mary Schantz. Motion carried with one no vote by Art Hernandez. g. 1114 Oak St. - This property is owned by Capitol Region Medical Center. Mary Schantz moved that there will be historic properties affected by the demolition and the permit is approved by the commission. Motion was seconded by Jane Moore. Motion carried with one no vote by Art Hernandez. h. 1120 Oak St. - This property is owned by Capitol Region Medical Center. Art Hernandez moved that there will be historic properties affected by the demolition and the permit is approved by the commission. Motion was seconded by Doug Record. Motion carried with one no vote by Art Hernandez. HPC Business a. CLG Report — Jayme presented the Annual Report of the Activities of the Historic Preservation Commission between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015. The Commissioners reviewed the report. Terri Rademan moved the report be approved. Kevin Kelly seconded the motion. Motion carried. b. Adoption of 2016 Calendar— Jayme presented a draft meeting schedule to the Commission. Art Hernandez moved that the schedule as presented by approved with the change of beginning time from 6:30 to 6:00 pm. Terri Rademan seconded the motion. Motion carried. c. Election of officers — Jayme reminded the Commissioners that Ed Meyers had resigned and Bill Case had been filling the role as Vice Chairman. All offices are up for election for terms beginning in January. According to Jayme a few members of the Commission had expressed interest in filling officer positions. She asked if there was anyone on the Commission who had not already expressed interest and wanted to be considered. No additional members responded. After a vote by ballot the following officers were elected. Chair, Art Hernandez and Vice Chairman, Jane Moore. Mary Schantz was reaffirmed for the position of Secretary. d. Working session for the Demolition Proposal — Commission member's comments and suggestions are to be sent to Jayme by November 25th. Jayme will provide the Commission with a document that contains all of the comments by November 30th. The Commission will meet for a Special Meeting on Wednesday, December 9th at 5:30 pm for the purpose of working on this proposal. Appropriate city staff will be at the meeting or will have provided the Commission with information requested. Dates to Remember: a. Next Regular Meeting January 12, 2016 at 6:00 pm Adjournment: Terri Rademan moved the meeting be adjourned at 8:55 pm. Sarah Hoeller seconded the motion. Motion carried. to IF I P4 yQE. ,d4d O f' City of Jefferson ,N�„�+01l4 Carrie Tergin, Mayor Department of Planning&Protective Services `° — Janice McMillan,AICP, Director 320 E.McCarty Street Phone:573-634-6410 Jefferson City,MO 65101 i Fax: 573-634-6457 To: City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission From: Jayme Abbott, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Date: December 7, 2015 Re: Demolition Permit Review at 1119 Jefferson St The following information regarding an application for demolition is being submitted for your review and comments in accordance with the requirements of the demolition ordinance. DEMOLITION PERMIT REVIEW Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to our history. Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or represents a work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. Property has a visual or spatial relationship to designated or potential landmarks or districts. Property is in disrepair or structurally unsound Property appears to be practical to rehabilitate The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed this property and makes the following recommendation to the Department of Planning and Development: ❑ There will be "no historic properties affected” by the demolition and the permit is approved by this commission. D Demolition will have a "no adverse effect" and the permit is approved by this commission. ❑ Demolition will have an "adverse effect" and the permit is not approved by this commission. By: Date: Historic Preservation Commission Representative Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CHECKLIST Please direct questions to Jayme Abbott, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Section 8- 32 of the City Code provides the Historic Preservation Commission with 60 days to review demolition application(s) affecting structures which are 50 years of age or older. Exterior & interior color photographs and a statement as to why the property cannot be rehabilitated or restored are required to be submitted with the demolition permit application. A negative response by the Historic Preservation Commission is not grounds for denying a demolition permit. Application to the Historic Preservation Commission can take place prior to completion of the rest of the Demolition Permit Application. Address: 1119 Jefferson Street, Jefferson City, MO 65109 1. Year Built 1940 2. Is the structure 50(fifty)years or older? 0Yes O No 3. Is the structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places? °Yes °No (Please see the list of properties at http://www.dnr.mo.gov/shpo/Cole.htm) 4. Is the structure a recipient of a City of Jefferson Landmark Award? 0 Yes ONo (Please see the list of properties at http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/pps/LandmarkAwards.html) 5. Historical name of structure(if any) 6. Historical use 7. Most recent use 8. If answers to Questions 2, 3 or 4 are"Yes,"please provide a statement addressing why the property cannot be rehabilitated or restored with a reasonable economic return to the owner(attach additional pages if necessary): OP )j ry i . 1Nc d (le 7�r%,<t.' t � f ri,641-xmezic-4?-1 ` lf; U52 r�� 1') ,t; f ,-44;! jaz1; t c *id has tooti tt (t. I- ,r co' ) , `z s r) )) a t;L nee// % 7 t t p 7 F,'. C t..< ' 9. t lease a c p otdgraphs either m hard copy or digital files of all exterior sides, interior rooms and stairwells. Photographs should have been taken within the last ninety(90)days. ()Hard copy photographs °Digital files 10. Applicant Contact Name and Phone Number: Name:. ., \ \o Phone: S 73 i {p^ f belt,L9 -Gov- 1\V{ 0)fr. " ts- 1�tla t. � Print Preview Page 1 of 1 MidMoGIS, MO 1 11 II ,` T � i.i. .,‘. 4� '4O 01 Idlr; '$. ".. 0/1, .,._..„ .. .. .., .... , . , 0. ! p k�I / .Ilii � I ¢.,i. II�`r F3. 47a ' e 11 ° I c: N 5 iIF ft's T Np‘ {{, ;' tF # pp Parcel ID 1104180002005017 Book-Page Date 357 -181 03/28/1995 MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH OF Owner Name Secliwn/Rng 18/44/11 JEFFERSON CITY Nailing Address 1120 MADISON ST Square Feet(Above Grade) 1,348 City State ZIP JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 Basement Type Full Property Address 1119 Jefferson St Finished Bsmnt. Size (Sq. Ft.) Subdivision CITY OF JEFFERSON OUTLOT Year Built1940 I _ Subdivision Image CITY OF JEFFERSON OUTLOT Date Certified 1/1/2015 S 50' OF SUB #3 EXC W PART GIVEN Comm: $0 FOR JEFFERSON ST RJ Property Description V� &N 15' Property Values (Land) Ag: $0 OFVAC SPRUCE ST LYING ADJACENT TO ABOVE Res; $7,000 Comm: $0 Book-Page Date 405 -347 12/3111998 Property Values (Improv.) Ag: $0 Res; $70,000 Book-Page Date 450 -635 12/18/2001 Appraised Value $77,000 Disclaimer_Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed_ This is nota Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,apprarsat survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 183 feet verifrcation- 1114171115 http://www.midmogis.org/colesl/WebForms/Print.aspx?img=http://www.midmogis.org/arc... 11/4/2015 1119 Jefferson St Demolition Application . • . _ .t •, . • , .. . ;° I 1 I O .0 , '`. 0.67 ac -,•.'`..,41. r '° ' i 'S ', e , _ 0 ',. The property is not listed on the drr .° aS *- .* National Register nor is recipient of City � . �. ��� , .� � � ,.���.� �, V - Landmark Award. . i h ,$ A�1A /< . y d 4 �a 1ti4 1 t, es°e e 'ya ' � .' , 1 Property was previously approved by 1 ‘44 ''°j. - 'fi HPC for demolition in March 2009. � wI 3.4 ,s .-.' 1 7 ac� .`,, d 4.2 C" � 11-:.')*. , 5 . • - , • tomi.,. 0 r..-- • t . . 4111(',7 + E ti \ ° ill a� �. �k }r '� '' .. ' , I.. - ,� r. , ;,. Book-Page Date 367 -181 03/28/1995 MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH OF Owner Name 5ec/Tv n/Reg 18144/11 JEFFERSON CTTY Mailing Address 1120 MADISON ST Square Feet (Above Grade) 1,348 City State ZIP JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 Basement Type Full Property Address 1114 Jefferson St Finished Bsmnt, Size (Sq. Ft.) Subdivision CITY OF JEFFERSON OUTLOT Year Built 1940 Subdivision Image CITY OF JEFFERSON OUTLOT Date Certified 1/1/2015 S 50' OF SUB #3 EXC W PART GIVEN Comm: $0 FOR.JEFFERSON ST R/W S N 15' Property Description OFVAC SPRUCE ST LYING ADJACENT Property Values (Land) Ag: $0 TO ABOVE Res: $7,000 Comm: $0 Book-Page Date 405 -347 12/31/1998 Property Values (Improv.) Ag: $0 Res: $70,000 Book-Page Date 450 -635 12/18/2001 Appra.sed Value $77,000 1119 Jefferson St Demolition . t . .', . 0 „• • - S''' — ' ''''*%'—'— M ' 11 iiiir-H 1 l' 111 O. -� ��`. Iii .1 �.� - -- ,it . — .,161 .fl il �.a , , - -. ..... ',-1.4.....,.,,,_,.... ::,...i.:-,:;..• h.Ya�tiw -: ,” "� ° $ L ''PW^` 1 ''-'- F �aw, yam:. .�t, "% L -'4. _.�,� +ci'flMl+ +°.'^!9 `�?�` e'.s< §�. ,<. -..,..'..-4...41$41:::7'.' ,.; ,.r. .. .f 4:r"'.,..f -e1 — :i,:.v.-T.1, rr.., ',z-v: 1119 Jefferson St Demolition Application ,. _____,__ a________ .. 6 _ _ ., IF .....,_,...__it H r Sijcg sl u ..s y'+ .� I'-'',.1- 1119 Jefferson St Demolition Application 1119 Jefferson St Demolition • t • . • . .• . „, ___ ,. . _ ,._,-. ‘,. , ,, ", . , ., . ,, _.,9, . ,__ _, , __ _.� :,,. .' ,..._______ .......___ ,....__________„. __________ ,. _____ _______ ... _______:,... 1•1 ... ........k :---,,:, _ _ ::::.;4:! •moi.....mi - 1_ • .. � .i if ,•, _ 4.1. c. gi i , ,..„ i ...,. 1 1119 Jefferson St Demolition . t . . I i , i , , ,. , ,,.., _ - ---N. ,......!T:' ''.7:2-f '-* \ r . / ,,,, _is .., , .__ , . ,,. ; .,, .77% . . ' r !-= - if f ___ __ ± , , I.- t C #,li, Ail $ r. _....... ,... . . .., _... .„........_ ,. , ., , .. L. s;,,,,or...._ ,kms. . 1119 Jefferson Street Property This property is the middle lot of three lots that Memorial Baptist Church purchased for future expansion and additional street frontage. In 2009, this house as well as the house on either side, were approved for demolition as they were becoming a financial burden to the church and were in disrepair. Volunteers worked on the home at 1119 to save it for up to five years for a newly formed non-profit association with the understanding the church would demolish the building after that point and continue expansion plans. The non-profit, Central Mo Foster Care and Adoption Association, used the home for six years until conditions became increasingly worse. Bats lived in the 2nd floor storage area for 10+ years and were finally removed in 2014. Open ceiling joists allowed the bats to also live in the ceiling of the finished 2nd floor space. All drywall and insulation is considered contaminated and needs to be professionally removed and replaced in order to continue using the space. Enclosed back porch has separated from the main structure and become unsafe. The porch needs to be torn off or rebuilt. Roof leaks were patched several times over the years, but due to a poorly designed front facade, moisture has saturated the west wall. Damage to the roof structure and framing is unknown. To make this structure habitable, a new roof and reworking of the flashing around the façade would be necessary and well as mold remediation. Staff members of CMFCAA were having reactions to the mold in the basement and main floor interior walls and were unable to work in the building for extended periods of time. The foundation is settling and cracking to the point of daylight showing which has resulted in leaks and more mold. Cost Estimates: Mold Testing $1 ,125 2nd Floor Clean out and Restoration $8,800 Back Porch Rebuild Bid range: $5,200-$11 ,300 Wood siding and windows also need replacement. Cost unknown Mold Removal in first floor walls - Cost Unknown Roof replacement - Cost Unknown Repairs were too major at this point to continue pursuing renovation costs. Central Mo Foster Care and Adoption Association obtained bids above for the required repairs but were unable to afford the updates. They moved out of the building in April of 2015. Because demolition was assumed, all interior and exterior doors as well as kitchen cabinets, the air conditioner and the furnace have been removed for reuse in other buildings. The Jefferson City Fire Department used the house for training in September 2015, which involved smoke simulations, busting holes in the interior walls, and cutting a hole in the foundation. We are appealing to the HPC to reconsider approval so that demolition could take place by mid-December. Due to freezing ground conditions, a January demolition will be more difficult, more expensive and less likely to be leveled and finished cleanly. Braun Inspection Consultants Proposal avail 1409A East McCarty Street O 1 ` Jefferson City. MO 65101 Date 2 z- ?O' (573)761-3581 Name /Address The Central Mo. Foster Care and Adoption 1119 Jefferson Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Pay Terms: Pay within 30 days of testing Description Qty Rate Total Samples are analyzed by a certified lab for existence of 6 75.00 450.00 asbestos. Representative sampling of paint chip for lead. Analyzed by a 2 75.00 150.00 certified lab. Thank you for the opportunity to serve you Total $600.00 InspectorASAP@gmail.com www.InspectorASAP.com Braun Inspection Consultants Proposal i CMI ij 1409A East McCarty Street Coed Jefferson City. MO 65101 - Date (573)761-3581 Name I Address The Central Mo. Foster Care and Adoption 1119 Jefferson Street Jefferson City. MO 65101 Pay Terms: Pay within 30 days of testing Description Qty Rate Total A visual inspection for the presence of mold growth. 0.00 0.00 Samples taken to help determine any presence of considered 6 125 00 750.00 toxic mold spores. Samples are analyzed by an independent lab An assessment is performed and a guideline is written to 375.00 375.00 guide the remediator in the proper removal of the mold Thank you for your business Total $1.125.00 I nspectorASAP@gmail.com www.InspectorASAP.com PROPOSAL PROPOSAL NO. SHEET NO. DATE - /Z7- zo/5 - PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT: NAME / _ ADDRESS 6 ADDRESS /9 .TRf-Snn S • � DATE OF PLANS Te . Nto PHONE NO. ARCHITECT nn II�� We hereby propose to furnish materials and •_ • the labor necessary for the completion of fCFT!r - !E n 1 boc1C Fbri'S /�E��/AS e�S`f/l 9�/�eca5 �• Q eti1���i �i�r • Dry , ns1zz 1 rd insilf d - R- i3 %rein in7?rbr e�5 'rn- d . Abir : FLer/rrra1 onel rrvn-f-,j nit inrincly-1 ,` Fx/rr)ar - Tr a) vny/ 61din9/�and . FF� vrrtfa--nrtr/h dere Loral-) al I r-l.r>5 r.0 i-Fh +rlw( / � . 1 rani /i (. cohere req}pr/ . Pns5;Ll2 on - sir, exrt -r- Jn(515 -tl rr-I- la►hn'+ In5pec�l/ (Iowa(Iowa /eon h (d al-lrr�ron All material is guaranteed to be as specified,and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work,and completed In a substantial workmanae manner for the sum of Dollars($ t-���o ' with payments to be made as follows: 1 rnxiLoma( down y v u°rrF or 50 6 pz /011111111111100/1 a deddon ken:bo�e w. r&1YS*q acme • coats wa be exempted Orly upon*Abn order.and witbicne an Respectfully submitted: -a ( 1-e"1� extra charge oar sM above Pa estimate. M.,,senses omen- pent Icon strkes,a:ddents,or delays beyond our catroL men-wMwOrrstrkes.axwems,ordelaysbeyondaxoamoL por .f e. &) ( -frr f✓�ro Note-1Ne proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted wkNn_days. The above price's,specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payments will be made as outlined above. Signature Date / — i 7 ,aoi 5 Signature A-08118/T-48118 0CC DICK OTKE CONSTRUCTION CO. January 20, 2015 Central Missouri Foster Care &Adoption Association ' 1119 Jefferson Street Jefferson City MO 65109 Project: Renovation of existing enclosed back porch Dick Otke Construction Company proposes to provide labor and material for the following scope of Uwork: Replace or repair existing floor joists Remove and replace material on underside of floor ORemove and replace all existing exterior walls and windows, using vinyl siding exterior, wood • — paneling interior with four(4)new 32"x48"vinyl single-hung windows Walls to be insulated Dick Otke Construction Company proposes to provide labor and material for the above scope of work for the sum of$11,347.00. Alternate lll: Insulate floor with R-19, add $265.00 (3 Price includes removal of all debris LLJ Price does not include any architectural or engineering fees if necessary .4..) Price does not include unseen damaged materials. Such materials will he replaced or repaired on a cost O + 10%time and material basis. Respectfully-st m ' ted, Tim Hayden, Pr ject Manager - Acceptance of Proposal Date -- (573) 893-2299 " 604-D Missouri Blvd. Court ci Jefferson City, MO 65109 Restore It Restoration,LLC Restore It Restoration,LLC PO BOX 2054 Jefferson City,MO 65102 573-632-9283 FED TAX ID: 46-3668333 Insured: Central MO Foster Care Adoption Assoc. Business: (573)298-0258 Business: 1119 Jefferson St E-mail: deanna@ccfosteradopt.com Jefferson City,MO 65109 Billing: PO Box 1505 Jefferson City,MO 65101 Estimator: Lonnie A.Beauchamp Business: (573)632-9283 Company: Restore It Restoration,LLC E-mail: lonnie_beauchamp@yahoo. Business: PO BOX 2054 com Jefferson City,MO 65102 Claim Number: Policy Number: Type of Loss: Bat Clean Up Date of Loss: Date Received: Date Inspected: 2/12/2015 Date Entered: 2/12/2015 5:25 PM Price List: MOCO8X_FEB15 Restoration/Service/Remodel Estimate: 2015-02-12-1725 Upon Restore It Restoration,LLC inspection there were a few noticeable concerns and they are as follows: 1. There is currently piles of bat droppings in the unfinished attic and this posses potential health problems. This needs to be addressed immediately. 2. There are roof leaks currently in the building.There is a flashing issue where the roof meets the knee wall over the door. 3. There is potentially asbestos tiles,with water damage,in the offices. The tiles would need to be tested to know for sure. 3. There is visible mold present in the basement; mold requires a mold re-mediation protocol that includes air samples to receive bids for the cleaning. Currently there are several cracks in the foundation allowing visible light in; and these would need to be addressed before remediation begins. The bat dropping clean up needs to be finish by April 15,otherwise there will be a 50%increase in the remediation project. This is due to the safety and heat exposure to the employees working the the attic. Restore It Restoration,LLC Restore It Restoration,LLC PO BOX 2054 Jefferson City,MO 65102 573-632-9283 FED TAX ID: 46-3668333 2015-02-12-1725 Main Level 34'11" Rooml Height: 8' 24'3" a T 6'10 6 5" 1 660.00 SF Walls 266.50 SF Ceiling 1-6'10" Rooml I■ 6'5 -H 926.50 SF Walls&Ceiling 266.50 SF Floor 29.61 SY Flooring 82.50 LF Floor Perimeter 82.50 LF Ceil.Perimeter II' l 11'8"-1 DESCRIPTION QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX TOTAL 32. Hazardous Material Remediation 1.00 EA 0.00 2,400.00 0.00 2,400.00 (Bid Item) Air sampling for the bat droppings. 33. Hazardous Material Remediation 1.00 EA 0.00 6,476.91 0.00 6,476.91 (Bid Item) This includes the demolition,clean up,and sanitation both sides of the attic. Totals: Rooml 0.00 8,876.91 Total:Main Level 0.00 8,876.91 Line Item Totals:2015-02-12-1725 0.00 8,876.91 Grand Total Areas: 660.00 SF Walls 266.50 SF Ceiling 926.50 SF Walls and Ceiling 266.50 SF Floor 29.61 SY Flooring 82.50 LF Floor Perimeter 0.00 SF Long Wall 0.00 SF Short Wall 82.50 LF Ceil.Perimeter 266.50 Floor Area 294.44 Total Area 660.00 Interior Wall Area 766.50 Exterior Wall Area 85.17 Exterior Perimeter of Walls 0.00 Surface Area 0.00 Number of Squares 0.00 Total Perimeter Length 0.00 Total Ridge Length 0.00 Total Hip Length 2015-02-12-1725 2/20/2015 Page: 2 Restore It Restoration,LLC Restore It Restoration,LLC PO BOX 2054 Jefferson City,MO 65102 573-632-9283 FED TAX ID: 46-3668333 Summary for Dwelling Line Item Total 8,876.91 Replacement Cost Value $8,876.91 Net Claim $8,876.91 Lonnie A.Beauchamp 2015-02-12-1725 2/20/2015 Page: 3 __f. jf7. Vim+,. ! yf•. • tyr 11. ! i •• • • M f J� Lp r q J I I • l\ig 41, i r 1 . . , , - , 4,40.- issaik 4 OMNI ; 4.........:3,;,,,,40.1,-.,-,-. _ i i , O'''' sem . ., '' • i _ »yi . t eti 1 F 1 1.1 Ili h 1 .- ____ _____ „,, _ _ r�' , / _,:x, , prlinif/�� , ft, ' it Ufa I, Ie 1� ift At ' fir-, . MINI ' f , .I 60/11 1 n �`. Ft1 ..1 i . . i ;w —, i t Wn Pn R • tqA -t:-,e,...-4&,,C,-.24W(4-4 : "&Spy'-'24W L ?ji `'r+�. ?f` K $xIllii If 1 t:4. l� Y . • a 0 • 11111.1140* i 4iy Y. ;•-•)-N.-••••1414,1 rk]� • 6e • • • Alp - �+�,Y.oavre...�.i�4 ..4... _ sr•.-._ a._�..`�e9P't�_ A yw err I 040111. 140011 . ARTICLE III.DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS Sec.8-32.Permit to demolish. A. Purpose 1. The Jefferson City,Missouri, City Council finds and declares that: a. Jefferson City has a rich historic heritage which is reflected in its people, culture, landmarks, downtown areas, riverfront, neighborhoods, cemeteries and historic structures such as buildings,monuments and other physical artifacts; b. The aforementioned historic landmarks, sites, structures and objects that reflect and are a part of the heritage of Jefferson City should be preserved as a living part of our community in order to engender a respect for the past and for who we are now and in order to nurture the cultural and economic life of our City. c. In the natural course of things, the historic landmarks, sites structures and objects in Jefferson City are being lost or materially altered so as to destroy their historic character, and the Council finds that lack of planning causes or contributes to cause the unnecessary loss of historic landmarks,sites, structures and objects. d. The public interest of Jefferson City will be served by the preservation of its historic landmarks, sites, buildings and other structures and objects in that such preservation will nurture the cultural economic life of the community. e. The present Jefferson City ordinances are inadequate to enforce the protection of the historic landmarks and buildings of Jefferson City. 2. The Purpose of this Article is to provide a mechanism for the safe demolition of buildings and to enforce long-term planning and other mechanisms for the protection of the landmarks and buildings of the City of Jefferson which represent important elements of the city's cultural,social,economic,political and architectural history. B. A-Permit Required. It shall be unlawful to demolish or remove without first filing an application with the Director of Planning and Protective Services or his or her designee in writing and obtaining a demolition permit from the Director of Planning and Protective Services in writing. Demolition shall be construed to include an act or process which destroys, in part or in whole, a building or structure or which threatens to destroy a structure by failure to maintain it in a condition of good repair and maintenance. A permit to demolish or remove shall not be issued until a release is obtained from the utilities having service connections with the building. The release shall state that service connections and appurtenant equipment, such as meters and regulators, have been removed or sealed and plugged in a safe manner. Any application for demolition or removal shall be subject to a sixty (60) day review period by the CJHPC, except any application made to demolish or remove any building, structure or humanly constructed object built less than fifty(50) years prior to the date of application, which shall have been determined to have no historic or architectural significance by the Department of Planning and Protective Services under the criteria set out in paragraph C. Any recommendation by the CJHPC shall be advisory only. Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to prohibit the building commissioner from acting under any emergency provisions of Chapter 8 of the Code of the City of Jefferson,Missouri. (Ord.No. 12941, §1,6-21-99;Ord.No. 13106, §1,9-5-2000) C- Review Process. Rev. 6/04-2014 821 1. Department. All applications for permission to demolish a building or structure shall be made to the Department of Planning and Protective Services.For any structure that is fifty in hard copy or as digital files, of all exterior sides, interior rooms, and stairwells, taken within the last ninety (90) days; and 2) a statement from the owner addressing why the property cannot be rehabilitated or restored with a r-asonable economic return to the owner. After examining an application and finding that it is in proper form, contains all necessary information, and complies with all applicable provisions of city ordinances, the department shall forward a copy of the application to CJHPC. (Ord. No. 15181, §1, 10 21 2013. 2. CJHPC. The CJHPC may have a sixty(60)day period for review of every application for a demolition permit subject to this section. The CJHPC shall establish procedures to expedite the review of applications for permits to demolish structures. (Ord.No. 12911, §2,6 21 99) C. Standards of Review for a Permit to Demolish.Review Process 1. Department of Planning and Protective Services a. All applications for permission to demolish a building shall be made to the Department of Planning and Protective Services. Subject to all other provisions of law, the Department shall have the authority immediately to issue a permit to demolish a building unless the application calls for the complete demolition or removal of a building that is fifty years old or older and owned by the City of Jefferson or any private person or business entity. b. For the Complete Demolition or Removal of all Buildings Fifty Years Old or Older owned by the City of Jefferson or any private person or business entity: The application must contain the following: i)photographs, either in hard copy or as digital files,of the building and all exterior sides, interior rooms, and stairwells, taken within the last ninety(90) days of the building proposed to be demolished; ii) a comprehensive plan for the continued development of the property where the building is located; and iii) a statement with reasons in support of the application for demolition, including an anlaysis of the costs and hardship of repairing and/or restoring and maintaining the property without demolition; and an analysis of the value of the property with and without demolition. The Department of Planning and Protective Services,after determining that the application is complete and in proper form, shall refer any application to demolish a building which is fifty years old or older which is owned by the City of Jefferson or any private person or business entity to the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission(CJHPC). 2. City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission a. The CJHPC shall have ninety (90) days from receipt of the application by the CJHPC to review an application for the complete demolition or removal of a building fifty(50)years or older owned by the City of Jefferson or any private person or business entity. In the event that the application to completely demolish or remove the building has not been denied or granted with conditions within ninety(90) days of receipt, the application shall be deemed granted. b. Upon receipt of the application to completely demolish or remove the building,the CJHPC shall immediately publish notice of the application by i)posting a notice prominently and in public view on the property; and ii)publishing the notice in the newspaper on three(3) consecutive Sundays; and iii) mailing the notice by regular first class mail to all adjoining property owners of record; and iv) mailing the notice by regular first class mail to all persons on a registry of persons who shall have requested notice of building demolition. Rev. 3/31/2009 822 The notice shall invite written comments from any interested person and shall state the address to which such comments may be mailed, state the deadline for the receipt of comments, which shall be the first business day following the last Sunday on which the newspaper notice is filed, and state that only the applicant and persons who have filed comments will receive notice of the decision of the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission. c. The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission shall establish and maintain a registry of all persons requesting notice of any application to completely demolish or remove a building fifty(50)years old or older which comes before the CJHPC. d. The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission shall either grant the application, or grant the application with conditions,or deny the application. e. The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission shall immediately mail notice of its decision by certified mail,return receipt,to the applicant and by regular first class mail to all persons who have filed written comments. 3. City Council: Only the applicant to completely demolish or remove a building fifty(50) years old or older shall have a right of appeal from the decision of City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission to the City of Jefferson City Council, and an applicant shall have an appeal right where denied an application to demolish or where granted an application with conditions. An applicant shall file an appeal within thirty (30) days of a denial or of the granting of a conditional application by filing same with the Jefferson City Clerk. The City Council shall conduct a public hearing on the application de novo and shall grant the application, gran the application with conditions,or deny the application. 4. Circuit Court: Only a private person property owner or a business entity property owner shall have a right of appeal from the decision of the City of Jefferson City Council to the Cole or Callaway County Circuit Court, and an applicant shall have an appeal right where denied an application to completely demolish or remove a building fifty (50) years old or older or where granted an application with conditions. An applicant shall file an appeal within thirty(30) days of a denial or of the granting of an application with conditions by filing a Petition with the Cold County Circuit Clerk or Callaway County Circuit Clerk(depending upon which county the property is located in). The Circuit Court shall hear the cause de novo. The Circuit Court shall enter judgment granting the application to completely demolish or remove, granting the application with conditions,or denying the application. The Court may deny the application only if the Court finds i)that the Petitioner has the economic means, considering all the reasonably available resources, to maintain the property without demolition; and ii) that the property may be used to its highest and best use without demolition; and iii) that the public's interest in protecting the historical character of the property outweighs the Petitioner's interests to be served by the demolition of the property. In any such proceeding before the Circuit Court, the parties shall be the property owner and the City of Jefferson,and the burden of proof shall rest upon the property owner to prove by the preponderance of the evidence that the property owner does not have the economic means, considering all the reasonably available resources, to maintain the property without complete demolition or removal; and shall be upon the City of Jefferson to prove by the preponderance of the evidence that the property may be used to its highest and best use without complete demolition or removal and that the public's interest in protecting the historical character of the property outweighs the Petitioner's interests to be served by the complete demolition or removal of the building. In determining the public's interest in protecting the historical character of the property, it shall be the City of Jefferson's burden to produce evidence and the court shall consider the said evidence of the historic value of the building by reason of age or association with important figures or events; or by reason of the place of the building in the history of Jefferson City, the State of Missouri or the United States; or by reason of the building's embodiment of the distinctive characteristics of a type,period Rev. 6/04-2014 823 or method of construction; or by reason of the building's representation of the work of an historically notable architect, designer or draftsperson; or by reason of the building's visual and spatial relationship to designated or potential historic landmarks or historical districts. a. The historic value of the building or structure by reason of age or association with important figures or events; or as evidence of aspects of the history of Jefferson City, the State of Missouri or the United States; or as an embodiment of the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; or as a representation of the work of an historically notable architect,designer or draftsperson; b. The visual and spatial relationship of the building or structure to designated or potential historic landmarks or historical districts; c. The state of deterioration or disrepair or structural unsoundness of the building or structure, and the practicability of rehabilitation. The CJHPC may request the applicant to submit documentation beyond that which is specified in the application in a form specified by the CJHPC or other information necessary to determine whether the property can be rehabilitated or restored with a reasonable economic return to the owner. (Ord.No. 15181, §1, 10 21 2013) -�— Approval or disapproval. Within five(5)days after either: a. the CJHPC's determination: or b. the expiration of the sixty (60) day review period, whichever occurs first, the director of Planning and Protective Services shall approve or not approve the application. A negative recommendation by the CJHPC shall not be grounds for disapproval of the application. _. 5 ! a• • • . • § 1, 5 1 92;Ord.No. 12791, §2, 8 17 98) Sec.8-33.Permit fee. No permit to remove or demolish a building shall be issued until a fee as set out in Appendix Y shall have been paid to the department of Planning and Protective Services or other authorized municipal agency. (Ord.No.9154, § 3,8-21-78;Ord.No. 9534, § 1, 10-20-80;Ord. 14272, §5, 10-15-2007) Sec.8-34.Maintenance of vacated premises. Whenever a building is demolished or removed, the premises shall be maintained free from all unsafe or hazardous conditions by the proper regulation of the lot, restoration of established grade and the erection of the necessary retaining walls and fences in accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of the city's building code. (Ord.No.9154, §4,8-21-78) Rev. 3/31/2009 824 Sec.8-35.Grading of lot. When a building has been demolished or destroyed by fire or other natural causes and no building operation has been projected or approved,the vacant lot shall be filled,graded and maintained to conform on all sides to the existing grades and elevations of the adjacent property. Adjoining walls shall be left in an acceptable condition to prevent the harboring of insects,rodents or pigeons. The lot shall be maintained free from the accumulation of rubbish and all other unsafe or hazardous conditions which endanger the life or health of the public; provisions shall be made to prevent the accumulation of water or damage to any foundations on the premises of the adjoining property. Upon completion of the demolition, the lot shall be left in a state that is aesthetically acceptable to the director of Planning and Protective Services. In the event of a disagreement over the term"aesthetically acceptable,"the matter shall be referred to the city council for final determination. (Ord.No.9154, § 5,8-21-78) Sec.8-36.Suspension of permit. Any demolition permit shall become invalid if the authorized work is not commenced within thirty (30) days after the issuance of the permit, or if the authorized work is suspended or abandoned for a period of ten(10)days after the time of commencing the work. All work including grading and lot re-construction must be completed within ninety(90)days after the time of commencing the work unless a written extension of time is issued by the Director of Planning and Protective Services. (Ord.No. 9154, § 6,8-21-78) Sec.8-37.Penalties. Any person who shall violate any provision of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars($500.00) or by imprisonment not to exceed one hundred eighty(180)days,or both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be deemed a separate offense. (Ord.No. 10397, § 8,4-1-85;Code 1983, §7-38;Ord.No. 11201, §4,4-17-89) Secs.8-38 u 4&.R„ser ea. Civil Remedy for Unpaid Fines Whenever a property owner shall have been convicted of two or more misdemeanors for violations of any provision of this article with respect to a single property and the unpaid fines and costs for those Rev. 6/04-2014 825 convictions shall have aggregated to more than$5,000.00,then the City of Jefferson may at its option and at any time until the fines and costs assessed for all of said misdemeanors are wholly paid bring an action in the Circuit Court of the county wherein the property is located to obtain a judgment in the amount of the unpaid fines and costs enforceable pursuant to the provisions of Section 511.350, RSMO. Such an action shall be in rem, and service of process in compliance with the Missouri Supreme Court Rules of Court for in rem actions shall be sufficient. Rev. 3/31/2009 826 ARTICLE IV. PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION Sec.8-39. Statement of Purpose. A. The purposes of this article are to promote the educational, cultural, economic, and general welfare of the community by: 1. Providing a mechanism to identify and preserve the distinctive historic, archaeological and architectural characteristics of the City of Jefferson which represent elements of the city's cultural,social,economic,political and architectural history; 2. Fostering civic pride in the beauty and noble accomplishments of the past as represented in the city's landmarks and historic districts; 3. Conserving and improving the value of property designated as landmarks or within historic districts; 4. Providing for economic benefits to encourage business and residential owners to locate and invest in historically significant properties; 5. Protecting and enhancing the attractiveness of the city to home buyers, tourists, visitors and shoppers, and thereby supporting and promoting business, commerce and industry, and providing economic benefit to the city; 6. Fostering and encouraging preservation, restoration and rehabilitation of the city's historic structures,areas and neighborhoods; 7. Promoting the use of historic districts and landmarks for the education, pleasure and welfare of the people of the city;and 8. Promoting the identification, evaluation, protection and interpretation of the prehistoric and historic archaeological resources within the corporate limits of the city. Sec.8-40. Relationship Between Districts. A. An application for a designated district shall be evaluated on a sliding scale, depending upon the designation of the building, structure, site or object in question. The application shall be evaluated on the following criteria: 1. Most careful scrutiny and consideration shall be given to applications for designated landmarks and historic districts; 2. Slightly less scrutiny shall be given to applications for designated conservation districts; 3. Properties designated conservation district shall receive a decreasing scale of evaluation upon application;and 4. The least stringent evaluation is applied to the neighborhood conservation planned district where the design standards are advisory in nature. Rev. 6/04-2014 827 Sec.8-41. Definitions. Unless specifically defined,words or terms in appendix A of this article shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this article its most reasonable application. Sec.8-42. Surveys and Research. The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission(CJHPC),as created by section 7-51 of the city code, shall undertake an ongoing survey and research effort in the City of Jefferson to identify neighborhoods, areas, sites, structures and objects that have historic cultural, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic importance, interest or value as part of the survey, and shall review and evaluate any prior surveys and studies by any unit of government or private organization and compile appropriate descriptions, facts and photographs. The CJHPC shall systematically identify potential landmarks and historic district and adopt procedures to nominate them based upon the following criteria: A. The potential landmarks and historic district which are in an identifiable neighborhood or distinct geographical area which have historic and/or cultural importance to the city; B. The potential landmark and historic districts are associated with a particular prominent person, a significant event or historical period; C. The potential landmarks and historic district exhibit a particular architectural style or school, or are associated with a particular architect,engineer,builder,designer or craftsman; D. The potential landmarks and historic districts contain historic, prehistoric and archaeological features, evidence and/or artifacts which have the potential to contribute to the understanding of historic and prehistoric cultures;or E. Such other criteria as may be adopted by the CJHPC to assure the systematic survey and nomination of all potential landmarks and historic districts within the city. (Ord. 13251, 8-20-2001;Ord. 14088, §2,8-7-2006) Sec.8-43.Reserved. Sec.8-44. Nomination of Historic Districts. A. Application/Nomination. Applications for nomination of an historic district shall be made to the CJHPC by at least seventy-five percent (75%) of all owners of record. Forms and criteria for nomination will be available at the office of the Department of Planning and Protective Services. Rev. 3/31/2009 828 Applications must be submitted to the depaztiuent; the department shall forward applications to the CJHPC. Each historic district must be nominated by a separate application. Each historic district must be designated by a separate ordinance. The designation of a historic district shall in no way alter the uses permitted by the existing zoning district of the property so designated. B. Notice. Upon receipt of an application for nomination of an historic district, the department shall notify the property owners within the proposed district of the application, arrange for a time and place of a meeting,and invite all interested persons to appear and be heard. C. Criteria for Nomination. The criteria for nomination shall apply to applications for designation of historic districts and landmarks. The CJHPC shall, after such investigation as it deems necessary, make a determination as to whether a site, structure, object or area qualifies for nomination pursuant to one(1)or more of the following criteria: 1. Its character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community,county, state or nation; 2. Its location as a site of a significant local,county,state or national event; 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the community,county,state or nation; 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style valuable for the study of a period,type,method of construction or use of indigenous materials; 5. Its identification as a work of a master builder, designer, architect, or landscape architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the community, county, state or nation; 6. Its embodiment of elements of design, detailing, materials, or craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant; 7. Its embodiment of design elements that make it structurally or architecturally innovative; 8. Its unique location or singular physical characteristics that make it an established or familiar visual feature;or 9. Its character as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure, including, but not limited to, farmhouses, gas stations, or other commercial structures, with a high level of integrity or architectural significance. Any site, structure, object, or area that meets one (1) or more of the above criteria, shall also have sufficient integrity of location, design, materials and workmanship to make it worthy of preservation or restoration. D. Appeals. A decision by CJHPC to deny an application for nomination may be appealed to the planning and zoning commission in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 35 of the Code of Jefferson City. Sec.8-45. Nomination of Landmarks A. Application/Nomination. Applications for nomination of a site, structure or object as a landmark shall be made to the CJHPC. Forms and criteria for nomination will be available at the office of the Department of Planning and Protective Services. Each landmark must be nominated by a separate Rev. 6/04-2014 829 application. Each landmark must be designated by a separate ordinance. The designation of a landmark shall in no way alter the uses permitted by the existing zoning district of the property so designated. B. Notice. Upon receipt of an application for nomination of an historic landmark,the department shall notify the property owners within the proposed district of the application, arrange for a time and place of a meeting,and invite all interested persons to appear and be heard. C. Public Owner. Applications for nomination of a public landmark shall be made by the city or other owner. D. Private Owner. Applications for nomination of a private landmark shall be made by one hundred percent(100%)of the owner(s)of the property or structure. Sec.8-46. Procedure for review following designation of landmark or historic districts. A. Building Permit Standards. After a landmark or historic district is designated by ordinance each, application for building permit within the area so designated shall be referred to the CJHPC for review at a regularly scheduled CJHPC meeting. Applications shall be submitted a minimum of ten (10)days prior to the meeting of the Commission. If the CJHPC makes no report within forty-five (45) days of receipt of the application, it shall be considered to have made a report approving the application. B. Design Criteria. The CJHPC shall prepare and adopt specific design criteria as it deems necessary to supplement the provisions of this ordinance.Within each of the designated categories,the design criteria will be applied more stringently to properties of greater significance than those with lesser significance as determined by their respective designation. The CJHPC may from time to time amend and supplement to the criteria used for review of historic districts and landmarks. The CJHPC must first approve additional design criteria not listed in this chapter, and any changes thereto,before the criteria or changes shall become effective. (Ord.No. 12794, § 1, 8-17-98). Sec.8-47.Definitions. Unless specifically defined words or terms of this article shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this article its most reasonable application. Adaptive use. The process of changing the use of a structure or property to a use other than that for which the structure or property was originally designed or a use for a structure or property other than the use for which it was originally designed. (Sometimes called"adaptive reuse"). Alteration. Any act or process that changes one(1)or more of the exterior architectural features of a structure, including, but not limited to, the erection, construction, reconstruction or removal of any structure. Architectural attributes. Those physical features of buildings and structures that are generally identified and described as being important products of human thought and action characteristic of a population or community. Certified local government (CLG). A program of the National Park Service designed to promote Rev. 3/31/2009 830 the preservation of prehistoric and historic sites, structures, objects, buildings and historic districts by establishing a partnership between the local government, the state historic presentation department and the National Park Service. A certified local government carries out the purposes of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended. Each certified local government is required to maintain a system of ongoing surveys compatible with the Missouri Historic Preservation Department process. CJHPC. The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission. Commissioners. Members of the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission. Consent. The vote as cast by owners holding majority interest in a parcel of real estate. For purposes of this article,only one(1)vote per parcel may be cast. Conservation district. Any area designated by the CJHPC in accordance with this section as an area containing any physical features or improvements or both which are of historical, social, cultural, architectural or aesthetic significance to the city and cause such area to constitute a distinctive section of the city. This overlay zone may be used for areas which have distinctive characteristics that are worthy of conservation,but lack sufficient historical,architectural or cultural significance to qualify as historic areas. Contributing (or contributory). A significant building, site, structure or object which adds to the architectural qualities,historic association or archeological value of an historic district because: A. It was present during the pertinent historic time; B. It possesses integrity and reflects its significant historic character or is capable of yielding important information about the pertinent historic period;or C. It independently meets the standards and criteria of this article. Cultural attributes. All of the physical features of an area that, either independently or by virtue of their interrelationship, are generally identified and described as being important products of human thought and action characteristic of a population or community. Accordingly, the term "cultural attributes" necessarily includes "architectural attributes" as that term is defined in this section. The term "cultural attributes"does not refer to the characteristics or beliefs of people who may reside in or frequent a particular area. Cultural resource. Districts, sites, structures, objects and evidence of some importance to a culture, a subculture or community for scientific, engineering, art,tradition,religious or other reasons significant in providing resources and environmental data necessary for the study and interpretation of past lifestyles, and for interpreting human behavior. Department. The Department of Planning and Protective Services of the City of Jefferson, Missouri. Design criteria. A standard of appropriate activity that will preserve the historic and architectural character of a structure or area. Designation. Official recognition of an historic landmark, conservation or historic district by the city council according to the procedures and provisions in this article. Endangered resource. A resource under a known or anticipated threat of damage to the integrity or existence of the resource,such as: A. An immediate threat which will result in loss of or collapse of a structure; B. An immediate threat or destruction by private action;or C. Condemnation for code violations. (Sometimes referred to as a"threatened resource"). Rev. 6/04-2014 831 Exterior architectural appearance. The architectural character and general composition of the exterior of a structure, including but not limited to the kind, color and texture of the building material and the type,design and character of all windows,doors,light fixtures, signs,and appurtenant elements. Facade. The exterior face of a building which is the architectural front,sometimes distinguished by elaboration or architectural or ornamental details. Historic district. An area designated as an historic district by ordinance of the city council and which may contain within definable geographic boundaries one (1) or more significant sites, structures or objects, and which may have within its boundaries other properties or structures that, while not of such historic and/or architectural significance to be designated as landmarks, nevertheless to the overall virtue characteristics of the significant sites,structures or objects located within the historic district. Historic preservation. The study, identification, protection, restoration and rehabilitation of buildings, structures, objects, districts, areas and sites significant in the history, architecture, archeology or culture of the city, state or nation. Historically or architecturally significant. Possessing that quality present in an area, site, structure, object or district because it: A. Is associated with an event or events that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history or architectural heritage of the city,county,state or nation; B. Is associated with the life or lives of a person or persons significant in the history of the city, county,state or nation; C. Embodies distinctive characteristics of a type,design,period or method of construction; D. Represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value; E. Exemplifies the cultural,political,economic, social or historic heritage of the city; F. Contains elements of design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant construction innovation; G. Is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on an historic or architectural motif; H. Is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or the entire community;or I. Has yielded,or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information. Key contributing. A site, structure or object of such an outstanding quality and state of conservation that it significantly adds to the architectural qualities, historic association or archeological values of an historic district because: A. It was present during the pertinent historic time; B. It possesses and reflects its significant historic character or is capable of yielding important information about the pertinent historic period;and C. It independently meets the standards and criteria of the article. Landmark. A site, structure or object designated as a landmark by ordinance of the city council, pursuant to procedures prescribed herein, that is worthy of rehabilitation, restoration and preservation because of its historic and/or architectural significance to the city. Landscape feature. Any element or component of outdoor open space including,but not limited to, fences, walls, retaining walls, gates, sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking lots, patios, terraces, decks, ground cover, trees, plants, outdoor furniture, exterior light standards, fountains, statuary, detached signs, and other such elements. Rev. 3/31/2009 832 Marker. A sign used to label or identify a designated landmark or historic district as an architecturally significant property. National Register. The current National Register of Historic Places established by passage of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 80 Stat. 915, 16 U.S.C.470 et seq. as amended. Noncontributing (or noncontributory). A site, structure or object that does not add to the architectural qualities,historic association or archeological values of a landmark or historic district because: A. It was not present during the pertinent time; B. Due to alterations, disturbances, additions or other changes, it no longer possesses integrity nor reflects its significant historic character or is incapable of yielding important information about the pertinent historic period;or C. It does not independently meet the standards and criteria of the ordinance. Normal maintenance and repair. Any improvement or work for which a building permit is not required by city ordinance designed to correct deterioration, decay or damage and restore, as may be practical,a structure or property to the condition that existed prior to the deterioration,decay or damage. Object. Those physical items that have functional, aesthetic, cultural, historical or scientific value and are relatively small in scale and simply constructed. While an object may be, by nature or design, movable, it should be located in a specific setting or environment appropriate to its significant historic use, role or character. Objects include sculptures,monuments,street signs,fence posts,hitching posts,mileposts, boundary markers,statuary and fountains. Owner(s) of record. Those individuals, partnerships, firms, corporations, public agencies or any other legal entity holding title to property, but not including legal entities holding mere easements or leasehold interests. (May also be referred to as "property owner(s)"). Current owner(s) of record are those listed as owners on the records with the Cole County Recorder of Deeds. Period. A chronological division identified in the analysis of the historical development to an area or region(i.e.,Victorian,Modern). Protection. The application of measures to defend, guard, cover or shield a building, site, structure or object from deterioration, loss, attack, danger, or injury. In the case of buildings, structures or objects such measures generally are of a protective nature and usually precede preservation measures. In the case of archeological sites,the protective measures may be temporary or permanent. Reconstruction/reconstruct. The reproduction of the exact form and detail of a vanished building, site, structure or object or a part thereof, as it appeared at a pertinent time using both original and modern materials and based on precise historical documentation and physical evidence. Rehabilitation/rehabilitate. The act of returning a site, structure or object to a useful state through its repair and/or alteration while retaining the characteristic features of the property which are significant to its historical and architectural value. Remodeling. Modification and modernization of a structure or property without striving to return to or replicate the original historical and architectural character of the structure or property. Removal. Any relocation of a structure in whole or in part on its site or to another site. Repair. Any change to a structure or object that is not construction,removal or alteration. Resource. Any site, structure, object or area that constitutes a source of present and future usefulness. Restoration/restore. The act of accurately recovering the form and details, based on precise historical documentation and physical evidence, of a building, site, structure or object as it appeared at a Rev. 6/04-2014 833 pertinent time including the removal of improvements that are not appropriate and the replacement of missing or deteriorated features. Site. The location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, mined or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural or archeological value regardless of the value of any existing structure. Examples of sites include habitation sites, burial sites, village sites, hunting and fishing sites, ceremonial sites, battlefields, ruins of historic buildings and structures, campsites, designed landscapes, natural textures, springs and landscapes having cultural significance. Stable. The area is expected to remain substantially the same over the next twenty(20)year period with continued maintenance of the property. While some changes in structures,land uses and densities may occur,all such changes are expected to be compatible with surrounding development. Stabilizing. The area is expected to become stable over the next twenty(20) year period through continued reinvestment,maintenance or remodeling. Standards. The Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, codified as 36 CFR 68 in the July 12, 1995 Federal Register(Vol. 60,No. 133),and as revised from time to time. Structure. Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires permanent or temporary location on or in the ground, including,but without limiting the generality of the foregoing:buildings,fence, gazebos, advertising signs, billboards, backstops for tennis courts, radio and television antennas, including supporting towers and swimming pools. Style. The specific identifying characteristics of a building both as it appears to the eye and as it is known to exist in design and structure. Survey. An architectural and historical examination of historic resources to identify historic properties within an area. (Ord.No. 12794,Appendix A, 8-17-98) Rev. 3/31/2009 834 Department Staff Page No. Section No. Subject Comments PPS Eric Barron 1 8-32 A(1)( c) Permit to demolish what does materially altered has to do with demolition? PPS Eric Barron 2 8-32 A(1)( e) Purpose omit PPS Larry Burkhardt 1 8-32 A(1)(c ) Purpose Does this affect building permits for alterations to buildings greater than 50 years old? If only complete demolition? Or partial demolition alteration? Law Bryan Wolford 2 8-32 A(1)(d) Purpose The purpose segment is not appropriate for a codified ordinance. See current 8-39 for a Statement of Purpose. Section A(1)(e) should be stricken. Please use the reserved Sec. 8-31 for your statement of purpose PPS Eric Barron 2 8-32 B Permit Required After second (2) sentence have a separate paragraph entitled review process or a different heading PPS Eric Barron 3 8-32 B Permit Required Last sentence refers to building commissioner. Should this be updated to building official? Law Bryan Wolford 3 8-32 B Permit Required Add the existing: Any application for demolition or removal shall be subject to a sixty(60) day review period by the CJHPC, except any application made to demolish or remove any building, structure or humanly constructed object built less than fifty(50)years prior to the date of application, which shall have been determined to have no historic or architectural significance by the Department of Planning and Protective Services under the criteria set out in paragraph C. Any recommendation by the CJHPC shall be advisory only. CJHPC cannot be the decision making body on whether or not a permit issues. This is an improper delegation of an administrative duty that is vested with Planning and Protective Services. CJHPC may serve in an advisory role only. PPS Eric Barron 6 8-32 C(1)(a) Review Process Completed application vs. receipt of application PPS Jayme Abbott 5 8-32 C(1)(b) Review Process Formatting is wrong: (1) should be (i), (2) should be (ii) etc. PPS Jayme Abbott 5 8-32 C(1)(b) Review Process 50 years is the general term in determining age and integrity of a property. PPS Jayme Abbott 5 8-32 C(1)(b) Review Process As part of reviewing demolition Area of Potential Effect (APE) shall be taken into consideration. Area of potential effects means the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist.The area of potential effects is influenced by the scale and nature of an undertaking and may be different for different kinds of effects caused by the undertaking. Applicant shall submit information for proposed use of site after demolition to aid in determining the APE. PPS Jayme Abbott 5 8-32 C(1)(b)(i) Review Process Photographs shall show the room as whole (even if taken from multiple angles). Photographs should not focus/zoom in on cracks, holes, defects, etc. Law Bryan Wolford 5 8-32 C(1)(b)(ii) Review Process Omit. This portion would be resolved with the landowner's application for building permits in the future. Law Bryan Wolford 5 8-32 C(1)(b)(ii) Review Process a statement from the owner addressing why the property cannot be rehabilitated or restored with a reasonable economic return to the owner. Law Bryan Wolford 5 8-32 C(1)(b)(ii) Review Process Revert to original:After examining an application and finding that it is in proper form, contains all necessary information, and complies with all applicable provisions of city ordinances,the department shall forward a copy of the application to CJHPC. PPS Eric Barron 5 8-32 C(1)(b)(ii) Review Process Large burden on property owner. PPS Eric Barron 5 8-32 C(1)(b)(ii) Review Process If requested, a comprehensive plan for the continued development PPS Eric Barron 5 8-32 C(1)(b)(iii) Review Process Analysis of property value referring to an appraisal? "analysis of the costs and hardship..." What level of repair is required?To maintain exterior envelope? Interior repairs required?Costs can greatly vary PPS Larry Burkhardt 5 8-32 C(1)(b)(iii) Review Process depending on requirements. PPS Jayme Abbott 5 8-32 C(1)(b)(iii) Review Process Doesn't Chapter 8 Section 81 B restricts the City from ordering mitigations if over a certain $ amount? Law Bryan Wolford 5-6 8-32 C(2) CJHPC Procedures for Permit to This section as a whole would likely be Unconstitutional because it does not contain any standards of review for a permit to demolish.The current Code Demolish section contains adequate standards of review. Law Bryan Wolford 5 8-32 C(2)( b) CJHPC Procedures for Permit to Where is the source of funds going to come from? CJHPC may not create an unfunded mandate. Demolish Department Staff Page No. Section No. Subject Comments PPS Jayme Abbott 5 8-32 C(2)(a) Review Process 90 days is too much time. The current 60 days time limit is sufficient as long as pictures submitted are of good quality, showing the room as a whole not focusing on defects. Law Bryan Wolford 5 8-32 C(2)(a) CJHPC Procedures for Permit to 90 days seems unreasonable to the property owner. Also, as previously stated, CJHPC may not be the final arbiter of whether a demolition permit issues or Demolish not PPS Eric Barron 6 8-32 C(2)(b) Review Process Formatting is wrong: (a) should be (i), (b) should be (ii) etc. PPS Jayme Abbott 6 8-32 C(2)(b) Review Process Staff time dedication not CJHPC PPS Eric Barron 6 8-32 C(2)(b)(iv) Review Process mailing the notice by first class mail to all persons on a registry of person who shall have requested notice of demolition referred to CJHPC. PPS Jayme Abbott 7 8-32 C(2)(d) Review Process add "during meetings" to end of sentence. Law Bryan Wolford 5 8-32 C(2)(d) CJHPC Procedures for Permit to CJHPC may not be the final arbiter of whether or not a permit shall issue. Demolish Law Bryan Wolford 5 8-32 C(2)(e ) CJHPC Procedures for Permit to Planning and Protective Services Demolish PPS Jayme Abbott 7 8-32 C(2)(e) Review Process Staff time dedication not CJHPC PPS Jayme Abbott 7 8-32 C(3) Review Process If allowing public to be on register for notification why would only the owner be the only one to file appeal? Law Bryan Wolford 6 8-32 C(3) City Council The applicant may appeal the decision of the Planning and Protective Services Division to the City Council within thirty (30) days of the date of the decision Law Bryan Wolford 6 8-32 C(3) City Council The applicant may appeal a final decision of the City Council by filing a petition for administrative review pursuant to Chapter 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri,to the Circuit Court within thirty (30) days. PPS Eric Barron 7 8-32 C(3) Review Process 1st sentence "...where granted an application with conditions." What are the conditions? BOA has set conditions to refer to. PPS Jayme Abbott 8 8-32 C(4) Review Process Isn't Missouri a property rights state? PPS Eric Barron 6 8-32C(2)(b)(iii) Review Process mailing the notice by regular first class mail to all property owners within 185 feet exclusive of right of way Law Bryan Wolford 13 8-38 Civil Remedy for Unpaid Fines Omit. This remedy already exists at law. PPS Jayme Abbott 13 8-38 Civil Remedy for Unpaid Fines Is this cost effective at the $5,000 level? Law Bryan Wolford 13 8-42 Surveys and Research Omit PPS Eric Barron 14 Article IV Preservation/Conservation The whole article needs work in terms of assigning roles, clarification, etc. Law Bryan Wolford 18 8-45 C Nomination of Landmarks Not State of Missouri Law Bryan Wolford 18 8-45 C Nomination of Landmarks How can there be an "other owner" when the section has already defined "public owner" as 1)the City, 2) Cole Co, or 3) Callaway Co? Law Bryan Wolford 25 8-47 Definitions Omit. "Landmark" is a creation of the City.A "landmark" must go through the proper procedure to be designated as such by the City. Staff Time Estimate Per Demolition Application 30 minutes Consultation with applicant and acceptance of application 30 minutes Preparation of public notice advertisement and transmittal to News Tribune 30 minutes Preparation of"185' buffer" and mailing list. 30 minutes Copy, envelope preparation, and mailing. 30 minutes Preparation of sign. 30 minutes Placement of sign on property. 30 minutes Review of application and preparation of staff report/analysis. 30 minutes Staff time at meeting. 30 minutes Preparation and mailing of notice of decision. 5 hours of staff time. Cost Estimate Per Demolition Application $ 200.00 5 hours of staff time at$40 per hour. $ 300.00 Public notice advertisement at$100 per week for 3 weeks $ 20.00 postage $ 20.00 supplies (especially laminator for the sign) $ 53.00 current cost of permit/inspection of demolition $ 593.00 Preservation Honor Awards Nominations Due 12/14 Page 1 of 3 Like 0 Tweet Share Click to view this email in a browser Missouri 's 2016 AA. Statewide Preservation '' ids l� Honor Award Nominations Due '` J December 14 SAVE THE DATE! MI Y 0 U I` Honor Awards Ceremony Date: RE S ERT I 0 N April 21, 2016 11:00 a.m. Preserving Place And Commun ty State Capitol Rotunda For Future Generations Jefferson City, Missouri Missouri Preservation's Statewide Preservation Honor Awards recognize excellence in the preservation of Missouri's rich and diverse collection of historic resources. The awards are given to individuals, groups and organizations that have contributed to preservation through documentation and interpretation of Missouri's architectural history, education, advocacy, preservation efforts and long-term projects. ONLY TWO MORE WEEKS UNTIL THE NOMINATIONS ARE CLOSED Do you know of a person, project or organization that has marked a milestone? DOWNLOAD THE NOMINATION FORM HERE and help us recognize the great work of Missourians in preserving place and community for future generations! The deadline is December 14. http://hosted.verticalresponse.com/1851799/1b98c7451 c/546552365/878dea5ccb/ 12/7/2015 Preservation Honor Awards Nominations Due 12/14 Page 2 of 3 5- . a i_., ' :, w,, i 011,017 : :23.11,, --_ii- L- -- . . - Iry . ' ., . i T lit'V 1 19' IN I M in - 4 '4 * 4 2015 Preserve Missouri Award Winner-the Shakespeare Chateau in St. Joseph The Awards The Rozier Award Named in honor of Elizabeth McReynolds Rozier, one of the founding members of Missouri Preservation and a noted Jefferson City Preservationist, the Rozier Award was established to recognize individuals who have made significant achievements in the field of historic preservation in Missouri. This is Missouri Preservation's most prestigious annual award. The McReynolds Awards The McReynolds Awards, also named in honor of Elizabeth McReynolds Rozier, are given annually to individuals or groups who have made significant achievements in the field or are in the midst of a long-term preservation project. The McReynolds awards are among the most important awards given out each year by the organization. Osmund Overby Award The Overby Award was established in 2003 to recognize published works that contribute to the documentation and interpretation of Missouri's architectural history. It honors Dr. Osmund Overby, Art History Professor Emeritus and former head of the http://hosted.verticalresponse.com/1851799/1b98c7451 c/546552365/878dea5ccb/ 12/7/2015 Preservation Honor Awards Nominations Due 12/14 Page 3 of 3 historic preservation program at the University of Missouri, Columbia. Dr. Overby was a nationally recognized leader in historic preservation and one of the founding members of Missouri Preservation. The Preserve Missouri Awards Presented for the first time in 2000, the Preserve Missouri awards recognize outstanding efforts and projects. Suggested categories include, but are not limited to: Commercial Revitalization, Institutional/Civic Building Restoration, Neighborhood Revitalization, Residential Rehabilitation, Historic Landscape Preservation, Rural Preservation, and Preservationist-in-Action. VIEW OUR 2015 STATEWIDE PRESERVATION HONOR AWARDS HERE Tel: (660)882-5946 Email: missouripreservation@yahoo.com If you no longer wish to receive these emails,please reply to this message with"Unsubscribe"in the subject line or simply click on the following link:Unsubscribe Missouri Preservation �.�;� 320 First Street T1 aI Boonville,Missouri 65233 US ,�o�uxr2., Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy. Free Email Marketing>? http://hosted.verticalresponse.com/1851799/1 b98c7451 c/546552365/878dea5ccb/ 12/7/2015