Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout06.21.2016 City Council Meeting PacketMEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 21, 2016 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fill out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the June 7, 2016 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Quote from Ditter for Ductless Air Conditioning System in City Council Chambers B. Resolution Appointing Election Judges for the August 9, 2016 Primary Election and the November 8, 2016 General Election C. Resolution Appointing Absentee Ballot Board Election Judges for the August 9, 2016 Primary Election and the November 8, 2016 General Election D. Resolution Recognizing Charmane Domino for 10 Years of Service to the City of Medina E. Resolution Approving Proposed Transfers and Assignment of Fund Reserves F. Call for a Concurrent City Council/Planning Commission Workshop to discuss the draft Comprehensive Plan on August 3, 2016 at 5 p.m. at City Hall G. Approve Proposal for Engineering Services on Pinto Drive Quite Zone Application with TKDA H. Resolution Amending 2016 Appointments and Designations to Various City Services, Authorities, Commissions, and Agencies VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. PRESENTATIONS A. Call for Sale of Bonds — Refunding of 2008A G.O. Bonds — Stacie Kvilvang, Elhers 1. Resolution Providing for Sale of $1,280,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds; Series 2016A VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. Deerhill Preserve (formerly Stonegate) CD-PUD Final Plat; Right -of -Way Vacation; Deerhill Road Public Improvement Project 1. Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval for Deerhill Preserve 2. Conservation Design — Planned Unit Development Agreement by and between the City of Medina and Property Resources Development Corporation for Deerhill Preserve 3. Resolution Vacating a Portion of the Deerhill Road Right -of -Way Approximately One- half Mile West of Willow Drive 4. Ordinance Establishing the Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District 5. Resolution Authorizing Publication of the Ordinance by Title and Summary 6. Resolution Regarding the 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Project; Accepting the Feasibility Report, Ordering the Improvement Project, Approving Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing the Advertisement for Bids IX. NEW BUSINESS A. Excelsior Group LLC — PUD Concept Plan Review — 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road B. LeJeune — Lot Line Rearrangement — 2782 and 2820 County Road 24 1. Resolution Approving a Lot Line Rearrangement between 2782 and 2820 Cty Rd 24 Posted 6/17/2016 Page 1 of 2 C. Jeffrey -Johnson Easement Vacation - Public Hearing 1. Resolution Approving the Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement at 2605Willow Drive X. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT XI. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XIII. ADJOURN Pasted 6/17/2016 Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: June 16, 2016 DATE OF MEETING: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Quote from Ditter for Ductless Air Conditioning System in City Council Chambers — Staff received a low quote of $8,949.00 to install a new Carrier ductless unit for air conditioning. The new system will address the air conditioning issues in the City Council Chambers. Staff recommends approval. See attached quotes. B. Resolution Appointing Election Judges for the August 9, 2016 Primary Election and the November 8, 2016 General Election — Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution appointing our 2016 election judges. See attached resolution. C. Resolution Appointing Absentee Ballot Board Election Judges for the August 9, 2016 Primary Election and the November 8, 2016 General Election — Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution appointing our 2016 absentee ballot board election judges. See attached resolution. D. Resolution Recognizing Charmane Domino for 10 Years of Service to the City of Medina Charmane Domino was not able to attend the City Council meeting to be recognized for her 10 years of service. Staff recommends approval of the resolution recognizing Charmane Domino for 10 years of service to the City of Medina. See attached resolution. E. Resolution Approving Proposed Transfers and Assignment of Fund Reserves — Staff recommends approval of the resolution transferring and assigning fund reserves. See attached resolution. F. Call for a Concurrent City Council/Planning Commission Workshop to discuss the draft Comprehensive Plan on August 3, 2016 at 5 p.m. at City Hall — Staff recommends calling for a concurrent meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss the draft Comprehensive Plan at 5:00 p.m. No attachments for this item. G. Approve Proposal for Engineering Services on Pinto Drive Quite Zone Application with TKDA — Staff received two quotes for the quite zone application. One quote was received from TKDA who is the engineer working with Hennepin County on the Highway 55/CR 116 intersection project for $7,750. The other quote was received from City Engineer WSB for $7,500. However, TKDA would need to revise the roadway plans for the project if WSB does the work. The cost estimate to revise the plans is $516, which would make WSB's total $8,016. Staff recommends approval of the TKDA quote of $7,750. See attached proposals. H. Approve Resolution for Updated 2016 Appointments - Council Member Jeff Pederson has resigned as the Public Safety Liaison. Council Member Kathy Martin has agreed to take over the Public Safety Liaison duties. It is proposed that Council Member Jeff Pederson would take over her Public Works Liaison responsibilities. The proposed changes are in red on the revised list. Staff recommends approval. See attached revised list and resolution. VII. PRESENTATIONS A. Call for Sale of Bonds — Refunding of 2008A G.O. Bonds — Stacie Kvilvang with Elhers will be present at the meeting to call for the sale of bonds to discuss the refunding opportunity at a lower interest rate for the City. See attached resolution and report. 1. Recommended Motion: Approve resolution providing for sale of $1,280, 000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds; Series 2016A VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. Deerhill Preserve (formerly Stonegate) CD-PUD Final Plat; Right -of -Way Vacation; Deerhill Road Public Improvement Project — On October 6, 2015, the City Council granted preliminary approval to Property Resources Development Corporation for the Stonegate Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD). On that date, the Council adopted Ordinance 588 and Resolution 2015-85, granting preliminary plat approval and approving the CD-PUD rezoning subject to a number of conditions. The approved preliminary plat included 41 single family homes and approximately 90 acres of permanent conservation area to be protected with a conservation easement. The applicant has now requested final approval of the plat. The applicant proposes to develop the property in phases, with this initial plat including 10 of the single family lots on the northeast portion of the site. See attached report and resolutions. Recommended Motion # 1: Motion to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Deerhill Preserve 2 Recommended Motion # 2: Motion to approve the conservation design - planned unit development agreement by and between the City of Medina and Property Resources Development Corporation for Deerhill Preserve Recommended Motion # 3: Motion to adopt the resolution vacating a portion of the Deerhill Road right-of-way approximately one-half mile west of Willow Drive Recommended Motion # 4: Motion to adopt the ordinance establishing the Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Recommended Motion # 5: Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing the publication of the Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District by title and summary Recommended Motion # 6: Motion to adopt the resolution regarding the 2016 Deerhill Road Extension public improvement project IX. NEW BUSINESS A. Excelsior Group LLC — PUD Concept Plan Review — 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road — The Excelsior Group, LLC has requested review of a PUD Concept Plan for an 87-lot residential development north of Chippewa Road and west of Mohawk Drive. The subject site is a total of 37 acres (31 net acres), with two single family homes. The subject site is guided for Low Density Residential development in the current Comprehensive Plan within the 2021-2025 staging period. See attached report. B. LeJeune — Lot Line Rearrangement — 2782 and 2820 County Road 24 — Laurence and Jean LeJeune request approval of a lot line rearrangement between their properties at 2872 and 2820 County Road 24. The subject properties under consideration are currently zoned RR, Rural Residential with the properties to the east, west, and south also zoned RR. The properties to the north are zoned AG, Agricultural Preserve. See attached report and resolution. Possible Motion: Move to adopt the Resolution approving a lot line rearrangement between 2782 and 2820 County Road 24. C. Jeffrey -Johnson Lot Line Rearrangement — Glenn Jeffrey has requested a lot line rearrangement between his property at 2605 Willow Drive and neighboring property at 2505 Willow Drive. The property owners are still discussing the proposed lot line rearrangement and it is not prepared for review by the City Council. Staff had published a public hearing notice related to the easement vacation at the June 21 meeting. 3 However, staff does not recommend that the Council consider the vacation until the lot line rearrangement is prepared for review. Staff recommends that the City Council open the Public Hearing, receive any comments, and then continue the hearing to the July 5 meeting. See attached report. Recommended Motion: Move to continue the public hearing related to the vacation of drainage and utility easements on 2605 Willow Drive to the July 5, 2016 City Council meeting. XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 003693E-003710E for $48,816.33, order check numbers 44441-44493 for $128,843.65, and payroll EFT 507223-507249 for $47, 700.71. INFORMATION PACKET • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List 4 1 DRAFT 2 3 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016 4 5 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on June 7, 2016 at 7:00 6 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Mitchell presided. 7 8 I. ROLL CALL 9 10 Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, Martin, and Mitchell. 11 12 Members absent: None. 13 14 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer 15 Jim Stremel, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Planner Dusty Finke, Public Works 16 Director Steve Scherer, Chief of Police Ed Belland, and Recording Secretary Amanda 17 Staple. 18 19 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) 20 21 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) 22 The agenda was approved as presented. 23 24 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:00 p.m.) 25 26 A. Approval of the May 17, 2016 Special City Council Meeting Minutes 27 It was noted in the last paragraph before adjournment, it should state, "...requested the 28 staff to prepare..." 29 30 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the May 17, 2016 special City 31 Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 32 33 B. Approval of the May 17, 2016 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 34 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to approve the May 17, 2016 regular City 35 Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously. 36 37 C. Approval of the May 18, 2016 Special City Council Meeting Minutes 38 Moved by Cousineau, seconded by Pederson, to approve the May 18, 2016 special City 39 Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously. 40 41 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:03 p.m.) 42 43 A. Approve 2017 Contract for Assessing Services with Southwest Assessing 44 B. Approve 2016-2017 Liquor License Renewals 45 C. Resolution No. 2016-39 Accepting Grant Donation from Shakopee 46 Mdewakaton Sioux 47 D. Resolution No. 2016-40 Accepting Resignation of Randall Foote from the 48 Planning Commission 49 Johnson stated that in reference to Item C, the donation is for the purchase of two 50 defibrillators, which will be valuable additions. He also thanked Mr. Randy Foote for his 51 years of service to the Planning Commission. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 June 7, 2016 1 2 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 3 passed unanimously. 4 5 VI. COMMENTS (7:05 p.m.) 6 7 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 8 There were none. 9 10 B. Park Commission 11 Scherer reported that the June meeting will be canceled. He stated that the scoreboard 12 will be installed in the park this week. He noted that following the park tour there was a 13 request to turn the t-ball field at Maple Park back into a baseball field. He stated that he 14 did tell the resident that he should attend a Park Commission meeting to present that 15 request. 16 17 C. Planning Commission 18 Finke reported that the Planning Commission will meet the following week to consider 19 two public hearings, the first a Concept Plan for a residential development and the 20 second regarding Just for Kix. 21 22 VII. PRESENTATIONS 23 24 A. Abdo, Eick, and Myer — 2015 Annual Financial Report (7:07 p.m.) 25 Mark Ebensteiner Abdo, Eick and Meyer, presented the 2015 Annual Financial Report 26 and audit results reporting an unmodified or clean finding. He stated that the internal 27 controls were reviewed and noted that a material weakness was made regarding Item 28 2015-01. He explained that it was an accounting entry that was corrected to remove a 29 transfer that had been included in the capital asset value. He highlighted the accounting 30 practice changes, noting that in 2015 the GASB68 changes were implemented. He 31 noted that his firm provides very minimal accounting adjustments for a City of this size 32 as City staff provides the majority of the accounting and also has a nice segregation of 33 duties. He commended the Medina accounting staff for their excellent work. He 34 provided a brief highlight of the fund balances and budgeted figures as well as 35 comparison to previous years and cities of similar sizes. He reviewed information 36 regarding debt services. 37 38 Johnson asked how Medina compares to other cities of the same size for debt services. 39 40 Ebensteiner replied that he does not have the information on hand but would follow up 41 and provide that information to Johnson. He continued to review information regarding 42 capital improvement funds and cash flow figures for each of the funds, comparing 43 revenues to operational expenses. 44 45 Mitchell asked for and received clarification on the City's share for the pension figures. 46 He asked when the City would have to raise contributions to cover the potential shortfall. 47 48 Ebensteiner stated that the City would have to pay more when the State changes the 49 contribution rate. He provided further clarification noting that the City would never pay 50 that entire amount of the shortfall but is simply required to record the figures for 51 amortization. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 June 7, 2016 1 2 Mitchell stated that it appears that real estate development slowed beginning in 2008 3 and then began to pick up again in 2012. He asked for an opinion on whether there 4 would be a future impact on the City related to development. 5 6 Ebensteiner stated that it appears that the City has set aside enough for future capital 7 through reserves that should assist the City in the case where development slows. 8 9 Martin stated that building permits result in increased property values which equates to 10 an increase in the property tax base for the City as well. 11 12 Barnhart replied that the growth will be seen over the next few years because there is a 13 two year delay with tax base and market value from the time of development. 14 15 Martin noted that the building permit fee is a one-time fee generation while the 16 improvement value would be seen for many years. 17 18 Anderson thanked Ebensteiner as well as Barnhart and Rigdon for their continued 19 excellence in their duties. 20 21 Moved by Martin, seconded by Cousineau, to accept the Management Letter prepared 22 for the City of Medina by Abdo, Eick and Myer as well as the 2015 Annual Financial 23 Report for the year ending December 31, 2015. Motion passed unanimously. 24 25 VIII. NEW BUSINESS 26 27 A. County Road 19 Trunk Sewer Maintenance Agreement between the 28 Metropolitan Council and the City of Medina (7:42 p.m.) 29 Scherer provided background information, noting that this agreement attempts to provide 30 compensation for the City providing regional assistance. He stated that there are still 31 some details to be worked out in the agreement and asked if the Council is comfortable 32 with the concept of the agreement. He stated that the issues that he and Batty wanted 33 worked out were regarding the generator, which the Metropolitan Council has agreed to 34 pay $2,500 per year for that use; while the second item was regarding an end date, 35 noting that the end date would be between 2025 and 2030. He stated that he would like 36 to continue to work with Batty to finalize the agreement. 37 38 Mitchell confirmed the consensus of the Council to accept reimbursement for this 39 service. 40 41 Pederson stated that he spoke with both Scherer and Batty in regard to whether 42 receiving payment would create a larger liability. 43 44 Batty stated that this is something the City is already doing and will continue to do, 45 therefore he did not see any further liability as this is simply reimbursing the City for 46 something they are already doing and will continue to do. 47 48 Martin stated that she spoke with Batty regarding the indemnification clause, which she 49 believed was more than it should be and should be limited to the losses caused by 50 negligence. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 June 7, 2016 1 Johnson noted that there was a typo that has been corrected. 2 3 Anderson stated that the City has already been doing this work without compensation. 4 He asked from a staffing perspective if additional hours or staffing would be required and 5 whether that is covered in the operating budget. 6 7 Scherer stated that the City has been doing this for at least the past 20 years that he has 8 been on staff, noting that the work is completed on contract and those costs would be 9 reimbursed. He stated that once this agreement is completed the focus would then be 10 on amending the tri-cities agreement. 11 12 Mitchell agreed that receiving payment is the first priority and the second should focus 13 on the end date. 14 15 Martin asked if there is language included regarding extraordinary expenses should a 16 major issue occur. 17 18 Scherer confirmed that there is language included to address that aspect. 19 20 Mitchell stated that he would also like to see maps included in the agreement. 21 22 Scherer agreed that the final agreement would include those exhibits. 23 24 Mitchell confirmed the consensus of the Council to direct staff to continue to negotiate 25 the agreement with the focus on reimbursement and an end date. 26 27 Martins stated that she would like additional information in regard to the statements in 28 the report regarding the Metropolitan Council taking ownership of the system when the 29 density reaches that point. She asked if it would be beneficial to focus higher density in 30 the area that would require the Metropolitan Council to take ownership. 31 32 Scherer stated that the Metropolitan Council will take ownership when the 33 Comprehensive Plans show the demand, noting that the density would not need to 34 necessarily come from Medina and would most likely come from neighboring cities. 35 36 B. Comanche Trail Improvement Project — Public Hearing (8:00 p.m.) 37 Johnson noted that the next three items require public hearings for the improvement 38 projects and assessment rolls. He noted that the Feasibility Reports were reviewed at 39 the previous meeting. 40 41 Scherer identified the three streets included in the improvement projects, noting that 42 these will be simple overlay projects. He stated that letters were sent out to the 43 impacted residents notifying them of the neighborhood meeting, which was held on April 44 26t. He noted that the Feasibility Reports were presented at the previous meeting at 45 which time the public hearings were called for. He noted that tonight the Council would 46 be asked to approve the plans according to the Feasibility Reports and order each of the 47 road projects. He noted that the Council would also be asked to adopt the assessment 48 roll for each project. 49 50 Anderson confirmed that Leatherdale would be accepting responsibility for her portion of 51 the project. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 June 7, 2016 1 2 Scherer confirmed that Leatherdale is in agreement for funding the reconstruction she is 3 requesting as well as the cost of the overlay that her property would be responsible for 4 with the project. He noted that she actually has four buildable lots, rather than one, in 5 relation to the overlay and advised that he did reach out but Leatherdale had a family 6 issue that arose and he was not able to speak with her. 7 8 Batty reviewed the process that should be followed, noting that the improvement hearing 9 and assessment hearing could be held simultaneously for each project. 10 11 Mitchell opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. 12 13 No comments made. 14 15 Mitchell closed the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. 16 17 1. Resolution No. 2016-41 Approving Plans According to Feasibility 18 Report and Ordering Comanche Trail Improvement Project 19 Moved by Martin, seconded by Cousineau, to adopt the Resolution No. 2016-41 20 Approving Plans According to Feasibility Report and Ordering Comanche Trail 21 Improvement Project. Motion passed unanimously. 22 23 2. Resolution No. 2016-42 Adopting Assessment Roll for Comanche 24 Trail Improvement Project 25 Moved by Martin, seconded by Cousineau, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-42 Approving 26 Assessment Roll for the Comanche Trail Improvement Project. Motion passed 27 unanimously. 28 29 C. Cottonwood Trail Improvement Project — Public Hearing (8:06 p.m.) 30 Mitchell opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. 31 32 No comments made. 33 34 Mitchell closed the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. 35 36 1. Resolution No. 2016-43 Approving Plans According to Feasibility 37 Report and Ordering Cottonwood Trail Improvement Project 38 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-43 Approving 39 Plans According to Feasibility Report and Ordering Cottonwood Trail Improvement 40 Project. Motion passed unanimously. 41 42 2. Resolution No. 2016-44 Adopting Assessment Roll for Cottonwood 43 Trail Improvement Project 44 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-44 Approving 45 Assessment Roll for the Cottonwood Trail Improvement Project. Motion passed 46 unanimously. 47 48 D. Lakeview Road Improvement Project — Public Hearing (8:07 p.m.) 49 Mitchell opened the public hearing at 8:07 p.m. 50 51 No comments made. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 June 7, 2016 1 2 Mitchell closed the public hearing at 8:07 p.m. 3 4 1. Resolution No. 2016-45 Approving Plans According to Feasibility 5 Report and Ordering Lakeview Road Improvement Project 6 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-45 Approving 7 Plans According to Feasibility Report and Ordering Lakeview Road Improvement 8 Project. Motion passed unanimously. 9 10 2. Resolution No. 2016-46 Adopting Assessment Roll for Lakeview 11 Road Improvement Project 12 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-46 Approving 13 Assessment Roll for the Lakeview Road Improvement Project. Motion passed 14 unanimously. 15 16 IX. OLD BUSINESS 17 18 A. Deerhill Preserve — Conservation Easement Agreements; Public 19 Improvement Project Update (8:08 p.m.) 20 Mitchell recused himself from the discussion and Pederson presided over this item. 21 22 Johnson stated that before the Council is the Memorandum of Understanding and 23 conservation easement agreement both between the City and the Minnehaha Creek 24 Watershed District relating to the Deerhill Preserve development. 25 26 Finke stated that Minnehaha Creek Watershed District would be the primary holder of 27 the conservation easement for Deerhill Preserve while the City would be a partner. 28 29 Batty explained that the conservation easement and land stewardship plan are included 30 in the Council packet as informational items. He noted that staff was able to comment 31 on those agreements, although the City is not a part of those agreements. He noted that 32 those agreements will be a part of the development agreement which will hopefully come 33 before the Council at the next meeting. He noted that the City was insistent that the 34 Watershed play the lead role in holding the conservation easement, while the City would 35 remain as a backup. 36 37 Martin stated that the conservation easement was well written. She asked for 38 clarification on whether both PRDC and Stonegate are included in the conservation 39 easement as both entities were listed in the settlement. 40 41 Batty stated that he is aware of that and would ensure that the correct parties are 42 included. 43 44 Finke provided an update regarding the 429 project. He stated that as plans are 45 developed the road project is not just pavement and fields and staff believes that there 46 should be discussion regarding whether certain elements should in fact be included in 47 the road project or whether they are elements of the development itself. He noted that 48 the scope discussed has been regarding the road itself, the stormwater improvements 49 and the turn lane improvements for Homestead Trail. He noted that the developer is 50 willing to install the stormwater improvements, which reduces the scope of the project 51 and therefore perhaps the turn lane improvements could be included in the road project. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 June 7, 2016 1 He noted that the developer is anxious for the project to move ahead and if the Council 2 is comfortable with the scope of the project, staff would publish notice for opening of bids 3 for the project prior to the June 21 st meeting which would allow the project to move 4 forward should the Council authorize the project at the June 21 st meeting which would 5 save the additional two weeks. He stated that if the Council does not authorize the 6 project at the June 21st meeting, staff could issue an addendum for the bids to delay that 7 process. 8 9 Pederson asked why the improvements would be necessary for Homestead Trail as that 10 is a County road. 11 12 Finke explained that would be similar to how the City expects developers to fund 13 necessary improvements which are deemed necessary because of the development. 14 15 Batty explained that the County would not allow the connection to the County Road 16 without the improvement, similar to how the City would require a developer to make any 17 necessary improvements that would be necessary to support the activity from the 18 development. He explained the aspects that would be proposed to be included in the 19 429 project. He stated that until a few months ago the developer had a plan to construct 20 the private and public improvements together in one plan, but now the developer has 21 had to separate the plans to segregate the items that would be part of the 429 project. 22 He stated after the continued negotiations between staff and the developer, he is now 23 comfortable stating that the items proposed for the 429 project would be appropriate. He 24 noted that even though the turn lane improvements were not originally thought about 18 25 months ago, he deems that it would be a reasonable expense related to the roadway. 26 27 Martin stated that the settlement agreement stated that the access roadway including 28 the full cost of design and construction will be financed by municipal bonds. She stated 29 that the additional turn lane will be helpful to the residents that travel that roadway. 30 31 Johnson confirmed the consensus of the Council to allow staff to publish the notice for 32 the 429 project as discussed. 33 34 Batty stated that at one of the next two meetings the Council will review the Feasibility 35 Report which will call for a public improvement project that will include the elements just 36 discussed and will be bid as the "City's project". 37 38 Stremel stated that there have been changes made to the potential scope of the project, 39 removing the stormwater aspects to further reduce the estimated cost of the 429 project. 40 41 Batty stated that the estimates that have been provided are similar to the figures 42 discussed 18 months ago. 43 44 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to approve the Agreement by and between 45 the City of Medina and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District regarding Deerhill Preserve 46 Conservation Easement. Motion passed unanimously. 47 48 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the Memorandum of 49 Understanding between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City of Medina 50 regarding the Deerhill Preserve Conservation Easement. Motion passed 51 unanimously. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 June 7, 2016 1 2 Mitchell rejoined the Council. 3 4 X. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:35 p.m.) 5 Johnson stated that the lower level City Hall project is moving along noting that 6 demolition began this past week. 7 8 Scherer provided an update on well number four, noting that the motor went down a few 9 weeks ago. He stated that he has consulted with engineering and came to the 10 conclusion that a new motor would need to be ordered. He stated that the motor is set 11 to arrive the following day and hoped that the well would be up and running by the end of 12 the week. 13 14 XI. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:37 p.m.) 15 Anderson stated that the Steering Committee continues to move ahead and will meet 16 again on Friday morning. He stated that the Committee will bring a draft of the 17 Comprehensive Plan forward to the Council later this year. 18 19 Mitchell stated that he will be attending the mayors meeting the following night. 20 21 XII. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:39 p.m.) 22 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to approve the bills, EFT 003665E-003692E 23 for $94,972.78, order check numbers 44368-44440 for $184,684.72, and payroll EFT 24 507164-507222 for $94,276.63. Motion passed unanimously. 25 26 XIII. ADJOURN 27 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to adjourn the meeting at 8:40 p.m. 28 Motion passed unanimously. 29 30 31 32 Bob Mitchell, Mayor 33 Attest: 34 35 36 Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8 June 7, 2016 DITTER COOLING • HEATING • ELECTRICAL SINCE 1946 RESIDENTIAL • COMMERCIAL "We're not comfortable until you are!" City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 We hereby propose to furnish equipment, labor, materials and permit for the following items: Remove existing condenser unit for council meeting room. Install new Carrier ductless unit with two indoor heads mounted above windows. Line sets will run up cove to eave and mount to the bottom outside edge of eave to the unit locations. Line sets will enter in through eaves and through the wall to the indoor head. Some access to the eaves may be needed to make connections and repair to the access holes is not included in bid. Carrier 38MGQF36 ductless condenser 18 seer efficient 2-Carrier 40MAQB18 ductless indoor heads db rating 33-46 Total amount due: $8,949.00* *price includes reusing existing high voltage connection to existing condenser Terms: payment on completion Tim Underhill Ditter Cooling & Heating 820 Tower Drive Hamel, MN. 55340 763-478-9558 763-286-5911 cell timunditterinc.com All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner According to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra Costs will be executed only upon written orders and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. Acceptance of Proposal - The above prices, Specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby Accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Finance charges of 1-1/2% per month may be assessed on over due accounts. Authorized Signature: Tim Underhill NOTE: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 30 days. Customer Signature: You, the buyer, may cancel this transaction at any time prior to midnight of the third business day after The date of the transaction. See attached note of cancellation form. NOTICE OF RIGHT OF RESCISSION (Identification of Transaction) Notice to customer required by Federal Law: You have entered into a transaction on which may result in a lien, mortgage, or other security on your property. You have legal right under federal law to cancel this transaction, if you desire to do so, without any penalty or obligation within three business days from the above date or any later date on which all material disclosures required under the Truth of Lending Act have been given to you. If you so cancel the transaction, any lien, mortgage, or other security interest on your property arising from this transaction is automatically void. You are entitled to receive a refund of any down payment or other consideration if you cancel. If you decide to cancel this transaction, you may do so by notifying: Ditter Inc. At 820 Tower Drive Hamel, MN 55340 (Address of Creditor's Place of Business) By mail or telegram sent not later than midnight of You may also use any other form of written notice identifying the transaction to the above address not later than that time. This notice may be used for that purpose by dating and signing below: I hereby cancel this transaction. Customer's Signature Date OffS OPTIMUM MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Commercial • Industrial • Residential Design " Installation " Service nROPOSAL 3030 Centerville Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 Phone: 651-429-2302 • Fax: 651-429-9506 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: City of Medina Att: Scott Johnson PROJECT NAME and LOCATION: DATE:06.08.16 Medina City Council Chambers — Added cooling Optimum Mechanical Systems Inc. proposes to furnish labor, materials, equipment, insurance, taxes, and overhead to complete the above referenced project in accordance with plans and specifications dated. Our work scope includes items as specifically included herein. DESCRIPTION: Remove existing condenser unit for council meeting room. Install new Carrier ductless unit with two indoor heads mounted above windows. Line sets will run up cove to eave and mount to the bottom outside edge of eave to the unit locations. Line sets will enter in through eaves and through the wall to the indoor head. Some access to the eaves may be needed to make connections and repair to the access holes is not included 1st yr warranty Permit Carrier 36MGQF36 ductless condenser 2-Carrier 40MAQB18 ductless indoor heads BID SUM: $9295.00 VE: - Provide York Equal — Deduct: $310.00 Note: Terms are due upon completion. We appreciate the opportunity to quote you on this project. If we can be of further assistance, please contact this office. Respectfully submitted, Randy Peterson Lead Project Manager/VP Optimum Mechanical Systems, Inc. NOTE: We may withdraw this proposal if not accepted within 30 days. s:/BidFiles/ Agenda Item #5B Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016- APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 9, 2016 PRIMARY ELECTION AND THE NOVEMBER 8, 2016 GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS, City Council approval is required for the selection of election judges; and WHEREAS, the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk have submitted an application to be Election Judges for the August 9, 2016 Primary Election and the November 8, 2016 General Election; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the individuals named on Exhibit A be approved as election judges for the August 9, 2016 Primary Election and the November 8, 2016 General Election. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that those election judges who attend trainings and/or serve on Election Day be paid a wage of $10.00 per hour with no benefits. Dated: June 21, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016- June 21, 2016 Exhibit A ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 9, 2016 PRIMARY ELECTION AND THE NOVEMBER 8, 2016 GENERAL ELECTION Jodi Gallup, Election Coordinator Erin Barnhart, Asst. Election Coordinator Janet White, City of Medina Election Assistant Pat Velch, Head Election Judge Patricia Gregor, Head Election Judge Dennis Morrow, Asst. Head Election Judge Caroline Ampuero James Baker Diann Benson Judith Bohn Mary Pat Byrnes Mark Christopher Sharon Christopher Kitty Crosby Debra Dalbec Eleanor Degman Paul DeJute Leslie Driscoll Cynthia Dyste Philip Engel Karen Evans Beverly Fry Margaret Garberick Dean Herman Resolution No. 2016- 2 June 21, 2016 Sandra Herman Paul Jaeb Marjorie Kearin Colleen Lecy Steve Lee Katherine Mohan Thomas Nelson Molly O'Brien-Hasek Ellis Olkon Laurie Rengel Terry Richmond Robin Reid Jeffrey Rumsey Julie Rumsey Katie Schmidt Carolyn Smith Shelley Swanson Katharina Thompson Julie Vanderboom Donald Verbick Mary Verbick Elizabeth Weir Christine Zonneveld Agenda Item #5C Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016- RESOLUTION APPOINTING ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 9, 2016 PRIMARY ELECTION AND THE NOVEMBER 8, 2016 GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election. BE IT RESOLVED by the Medina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as the City of Medina Absentee Ballot Board Election Judges for the August 9, 2016 Primary Election and the November 8, 2016 General Election; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Medina City Council also appoints other individuals and all members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn. Stat. 204B.21, subd. 2 under the direction of the Election Manager to serve as members of the Medina Absentee Ballot Board; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that those election judges whom serve on the absentee ballot board be paid a wage of $10.00 per hour with no benefits. Dated: June 21, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016- June 21, 2016 Exhibit A ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 9, 2016 PRIMARY ELECTION AND THE NOVEMBER 8, 2016 GENERAL ELECTION Jodi Gallup, Election Coordinator Erin Barnhart, Asst. Election Coordinator Janet White, City of Medina Election Assistant Pat Velch, Head Election Judge Patricia Gregor, Head Election Judge Dennis Morrow, Asst. Head Election Judge Caroline Ampuero James Baker Diann Benson Judith Bohn Mary Pat Byrnes Mark Christopher Sharon Christopher Kitty Crosby Debra Dalbec Eleanor Degman Paul DeJute Leslie Driscoll Cynthia Dyste Philip Engel Karen Evans Beverly Fry Margaret Garberick Dean Herman Resolution No. 2016- 2 June 21, 2016 Sandra Herman Paul Jaeb Marjorie Kearin Colleen Lecy Steve Lee Katherine Mohan Thomas Nelson Molly O'Brien-Hasek Ellis Olkon Laurie Rengel Terry Richmond Robin Reid Jeffrey Rumsey Julie Rumsey Katie Schmidt Carolyn Smith Shelley Swanson Katharina Thompson Julie Vanderboom Donald Verbick Mary Verbick Elizabeth Weir Christine Zonneveld Agenda Item #5D Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016- RECOGNIZING INVESTIGATOR CHARMANE DOMINO FOR TEN YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF MEDINA WHEREAS, Charmane Domino has been a valued full time City of Medina employee in the Police Department since June 7, 2006; and WHEREAS, Charmane has served as a licensed peace officer at the City of Medina for ten years; and WHEREAS, Charmane served four and one-half years as a Patrol Officer; and WHEREAS, Charmane served as our in-house investigator for five and one-half years; and WHEREAS, Charmane has managed high profile cases for the department with successful outcomes on a regular basis; and WHEREAS, Charmane has developed great skills and expertise in the investigations field; and WHEREAS, Charmane has maintained a 60 percent or better clearance rate while she has been in investigations, and WHEREAS, Charmane has served as the Reserve Coordinator for two years; and WHEREAS, Charmane brings a great attitude, energy, and work ethic to the job daily; and WHEREAS, Charmane has received numerous thank you letters from residents and neighboring depaitinents for her dedicated and professional service; and WHEREAS, the City of Medina expresses sincere gratitude for Charmane's dedication and continued service to the Medina community NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Medina acknowledges and thanks Charmane Domino for ten years of service to the community. Dated: June 21, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Resolution No. 2016- June 21, 2016 ATTEST: Scott Johnson, City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016- 2 June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #5E Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016- RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED TRANSFERS AND ASSIGNMENT OF FUND RESERVES WHEREAS, for 12/31/15, the fund balance goal is $1,772,248 (using 5/12 of 2016 budgeted expenditures of $4,253,394). The General fund balance at 12/31/15 was $2,391,059 or $618,811 above the goal; $288,108 being surplus from 2015 and the remaining $330,703 reserves. BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following actions be: $200,000 be Transferred from the General Fund to the following funds: - Equipment Replacement Fund: $130,000 for Police and Public Works equipment - Road Fund: $70,000 to assist financing upcoming road projects. $205,000 be Assigned from General Fund reserves: - $125,000 for quiet zone at the railroad crossing at Hwy 55 and CR 116. - $80,000 for potential legal fees. $40,000 be Reassigned from General Fund reserves: - Reassign $40,000 for health insurance self -insure buy -in (no longer needed) to retirement liability for post -retirement benefits. Date: June 21, 2016 Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Resolution No. 2016- June 21, 2016 Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016- 2 June 21, 2016 1 TKDA June 14, 2016 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 651.292.4400 tkda.com Mr. Scott Johnson City Administrator 2052 County Road 24 Medina, Minnesota 55340 Re: Revised Proposal for Engineering Services Pinto Drive Quiet Zone Application Dear Mr. Johnson: In response to your request, we propose to provide Engineering Services in connection with the Pinto Drive Quiet Zone Application, hereinafter called the Project. Our services will be provided in the manner described in this Proposal subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the attached "General Provisions of Engineer -Architect Agreement" dated July 2009. Hereinafter, the City of Medina is referred to as the CITY. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The CITY proposes implementing a Quiet Zone at the railroad crossing on Pinto Drive located just south of TH 55. The north and south approaches to TH 55 will be reconstructed by Hennepin County in 2017. Reconstruction will include the installation of a new railroad crossing and associated gates and lights. A median will be constructed north and south of the tracks. The median on the north side will be less than 60 feet long. As such, Alternative Safety Measures (ASMs) will be required. Based on Quiet Zone analysis and consultation with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), TKDA will determine proposed ASMs, prepare a Notice of Intent for City submittal to the FRA, prepare a Quiet Zone Application to the FRA, and revise County Roadway Plans to Incorporate the ASMs. Based on the office and on -site meetings held May 17, 2011, with the FRA, CP Railway, MnDOT, Hennepin County, and CITY representatives, the ASM application process will be required. It is assumed that a follow-up meeting will not be required. II. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY TKDA Based on TKDA'S understanding of the Project, we propose to provide the following services: A. Proiect Management and Quality Management 1. Administration and General Coordination - This task includes the day-to-day Project management, client communications, status updates and preparation of invoices. 2. Meetings — TKDA will attend one City Council Meeting to present the status of the quiet zone analysis. 3. Quality Management — We will perform Quality Control checks and reviews of the documents prior to submittal. Our Quality Manager will assure that the appropriate Quality Control procedures are performed. An employee -owned company promoting affirmative action and equal opportunity. Mr. Scott Johnson City of Medina Revised Proposal for Engineering Services - Pinto Drive Quiet Zone Application June 14, 2016 Page 2 B. Coordinate Potential ASMs 1. Develop Potential ASMs — We will consider previously documented potential Alternative Safety Measures (ASMs) and develop additional ASMs that meet Project requirements. 2. Consult with the FRA — We will consult with the FRA to ensure potential ASMs are reasonable and acceptable. 3. Coordinate with CP, MnDOT, County and City — We will coordinate with CP, MnDOT, County and City representatives to inform and request preliminary comments regarding the potential ASMs considered. C. Determine Effectiveness of Proposed ASMs 1. Compute QZRI — We will enter proposed ASMs into the online calculator to compute the Quiet Zone Risk Index (QZRI) for various combinations of ASMs. 2. Determine RIWH/NSRT and compare to QARI — We will compare the QZRI results with the Risk Index Without Horns (RIWH) and the Nationwide Significant Risk Threshold (NSRT) values. D. Prepare Notice of Intent 1. Assemble Required Information — We will assemble the information required for development of the Notice of Intent. 2. Prepare Notice of Intent — We will prepare the Notice of Intent document and provide to the CITY for submittal to the FRA, CP, MnDOT and Hennepin County. E. Prepare Quiet Zone Application 1. Assemble Analysis and Data — We will assemble inventory forms, analysis results and other relevant data for inclusion in the application. 2. Prepare Exhibits — We will prepare graphical exhibits for insertion in the application. 3. Prepare Quiet Zone Application — We will write and assemble the required information to complete the Quiet Zone Application. F. Revise Roadway Plans to Incorporate ASMs Modify Relevant Plan Sheets and Special Provisions — We will make the necessary updates to plan sheets in MicroStation and to Special Provisions in MS Word to properly incorporate approved Quiet Zone ASM improvements. III. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES These responsibilities shall be as set forth in Article 8 of the General Provisions and as further described or clarified hereinbelow: A. Designate one individual to act as a representative with respect to the work to be performed, and such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define policies, and make decisions with respect to critical elements pertinent to the Project. This individual shall be identified in the signature block area of this Proposal. B. Provide TKDA with site access as required to perform services listed in SECTION II above. Mr. Scott Johnson City of Medina Revised Proposal for Engineering Services - Pinto Drive Quiet Zone Application June 14, 2016 Page 3 C. Provide reviews of materials furnished by TKDA in a reasonable and prompt manner so that the Project schedule can be maintained. IV. PERIOD OF SERVICE We would expect to start our services promptly upon receipt of your written acceptance of this Proposal and to complete SECTION II services within the schedule required by the FRA. V. COMPENSATION Compensation to TKDA for services provided as described in SECTION II of this Proposal shall be on an Hourly Time and Materials basis in the estimated amount of $ 7,750. Our detailed Project Fee Estimate is attached. Payment shall be made in accordance with Article 3 of the attached General Provisions. The level of effort required to accomplish SECTION II services can be affected by factors which are beyond our control. Therefore, if it appears at any time that charges for services rendered under SECTION II will exceed the above, we agree that we will not perform services or incur costs which will result in billings in excess of such amount until we have been advised by you that additional funds are available and our work can proceed. VI. CONTRACTUAL INTENT We thank you for the opportunity to submit this Proposal. We agree that this letter and attachments constitute a contract between us upon its signature by an authorized official of the City of Medina and the return of a signed original to us. This Proposal will be open for acceptance for 60 days, unless the provisions herein are changed by us in writing prior to that time. Sincerely, Jeff Hil.'-n, PE, PTOE ` Kevin R. Cullen, PE Project Manager ATTACHMENTS: PROJECT FEE ESTIMATE GENERAL PROVISIONS ACCEPTED FOR CITY OF MEDINA Vice President By: Printed Name/Title Date (signature) CLIENT'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: Name/Title Phone Email .111 TKDA Project Fee Estimate Client: City of Medina Date: 6/4/2016 Project: Pinto Drive Quiet Zone Application Prepared By: JAH Task Task Description Estimated Person Hours Required Total Hours Total Dollars Sr Reg Sr Reg Spec II Grad Engr Tech II Tech II A Project Management and Quality Management 1. Administrative and General Coordination 6 6 $ 918 2. Meetings (attend one City Council Meeting) 4 4 $ 612 3. Quality Management 2 2 $ 348 B Cordinate Potential ASMs 1. Develop Potential ASMs 2 4 6 $ 578 2. Consult with FRA 2 2 $ 306 3. Coordinate with CP, MnDOT, County, City 2 2 $ 306 C Determine Effectiveness of Proposed ASMs 1. Compute QZRI 4 4 $ 272 2. Determine RIWHINSRT and compare to QZRI 2 4 6 $ 578 D Prepare Notice of Intent 1. Assemble required information 2 6 8 $ 714 2. Prepare Notice of Intent 2 4 2 8 $ 700 E Prepare Quiet Zone Application 1. Assemble analysis and data 2 4 6 $ 578 2. Prepare exhibits 2 2 4 $ 414 3. Prepare Quiet Zone Application 2 6 2 10 $ 836 F Revise Roadway Plans to Incorporate ASMs 1. Modify relevant plan sheets and special provisions 4 4 $ 516 Total Person Hours 26 2 6 32 2 4 72 Billing Rate/Hrx Multiplier $ 153 $ 174 $ 129 $ 68 $ 78 $ 61 Total Billable for Charged Time $ 3,978 $ 348 $ 774 $ 2,176 $ 156 $ 244 $ 7,676 Expenses Travel & Subsistence(TS) $ 70 Total Project Fees ' $ 7,757I ARTICLE 1. GENERAL These General Provisions supplement and become part of the Agreement between Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates, Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as TKDA, and the other Party to the Agreement, hereinafter referred to as CLIENT, wherein the CLIENT engages TKDA to provide certain Engineering, Architectural, and/or Planning services. Either Party to this Agreement may be referred to as a "Party" or collectively as "Parties." As used herein, the term "Agreement" refers to (1) TKDA's original Engagement Letter or proposal (the "Engagement Letter") which forms the basis for the Agreement; (2) these General Provisions, and (3) any attached Exhibits, as if they were part of one and the same document. With respect to the order of precedence, any attached Exhibits shall govern over these General Provisions and the Engagement Letter shall govem over any attached Exhibits and these General Provisions. ARTICLE 2. PERIOD OF SERVICE The term of this Agreement for the performance of services hereunder shall be as set forth in TKDA's Engagement Letter. Any lump sum or estimated maximum payment amounts set forth in the Engagement Letter have been established in anticipation of the orderly and continuous progress of the project in accordance with the schedule set forth in the Engagement Letter or any Exhibits attached thereto. ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION TO TKDA A. Compensation to TKDA for services shall be as designated in the Engagement Letter. The CLIENT shall make monthly payments to TKDA within 30 days of date of invoice. B. The CLIENT will pay the balance stated on the invoice unless CLIENT notifies TKDA in writing of the particular item that is alleged to be incorrect within 15 days from the date of invoice, in which case all undisputed items shall be paid and amounts in dispute shall become due upon an adjudicated resolution or upon agreement of the parties. All accounts unpaid after 30 days from the date of original invoice shall be subject to a service charge of 1-1/2% per month, or the maximum amount authorized by law, whichever is less. TKDA shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred in connection with collecting amounts owed by CLIENT. In addition, TKDA may, after giving seven days' written notice to the CLIENT, suspend services under this Agreement until TKDA has been paid in full for all amounts then due for services, expenses and charges. CLIENT agrees that it shall waive any and all claims against TKDA and that TKDA shall not be responsible for any daims arising from suspension of services hereunder. ARTICLE 4. EXTRA WORK If TKDA is of the opinion that any work it has been directed to perform is beyond the Scope of this Agreement, or that the level of effort required exceeds that estimated due to changed conditions and thereby constitutes extra work, it shall notify the CLIENT of that fact Upon written notification to CLIENT, TKDA shall be entitled to additional compensation for same, and to an extension of time for completion absent timely written objection by CLIENT to additional services. ARTICLE 5. ABANDONMENT, CHANGE OF PLAN AND TERMINATION Either Party has the right to terminate this Agreement upon seven days' written notice for convenience of either CLIENT or TKDA. In addition, the CLIENT may at any time reduce the scope of this Agreement Such reduction in scope shall be set forth in a written notice from the CLIENT to TKDA. In the event of unresolved dispute over change in scope or changed conditions, this Agreement may also be terminated upon seven days' written notice as provided above. In the event of a termination or reduction in scope of the project work, TKDA shall be paid for the work performed and expenses incurred on the project work and for any completed and abandoned work for which payment has not been made, computed in accordance with the provisions of the Engagement Letter and payment of a reasonable amount for services and expenses directly attributable to termination, both before and after the effective date of termination, such as reassignment of personnel, costs of terminating contracts with TKDA's subconsultants, costs of producing copies of file materials and other related close-out costs. ARTICLE 6. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, REPORTS AND OTHER DATA All documents, including reports, drawings, calculations, specifications, CADD materials, computer software or hardware or other work product prepared by TKDA pursuant to this Agreement are TKDA's Instruments of Service and TKDA retains all ownership interests in said Instruments of Service, induding copyrights. Any use or reuse of such Instruments of Service, except for the specific purpose intended, by the CLIENT or others without written consent, verification, or adaptation by TKDA will be at the CLIENT's risk and full legal responsibility. In this regard, the CLIENT will indemnify and hold harmless TKDA from any and all suits or claims of third parties arising out of such use or reuse which is not specifically verified, adapted, or authorized by TKDA. Copies of documents that may be relied upon by the CLIENT are limited to the printed copies (also known as hard copies) that are signed or sealed by TKDA's Engineer or Architect. Files in electronic format fumished to the CLIENT are only for convenience of the CLIENT. Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such electronic files TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED General Provisions of Engineer -Architect Agreement will be at the user's sole risk. If there is a discrepancy between the electronic files and the hard copies, the hard copies govern. In the event electronic copies of documents are made available to the CLIENT, the CLIENT acknowledges that the useful life of electronic media may be limited because of deterioration of the media, obsolescence of the computer hardware and/or software systems or other causes outside of TKDA's control. Therefore, TKDA makes no representation that such media will be fully usable beyond 30 days from date of delivery to CLIENT. If requested, at the time of completion or termination of the work, TKDA shall make available to the CLIENT at CLIENT'S expense copies of the Instruments of Service upon (i) payment of amounts due and owing for work performed and expenses incurred under this Agreement, and (ii) fulfillment of the CLIENT's obligations under this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. CLIENT'S ACCEPTANCE BY PURCHASE ORDER In lieu of or in addition to execution of the Engagement Letter, the CLIENT may authorize TKDA to commence services by issuing a purchase order by a duly authorized representative. Such authority to commence services or purchase order shall incorporate by reference the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event the terms and conditions of this Agreement conflict with those contained in the CLIENT's purchase order, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall govern. Notwithstanding any purchase order provisions to the contrary, no warranties, express or implied, are made by TKDA. In Order to implement the intent of Parties to this Agreement, the Parties agree that the Engagement Letter, these General Provisions, and any Exhibits constitute the entire Agreement between them. The Parties further agree that the preprinted terms and conditions of any CLIENT -generated purchase order issued to request work pursuant to this Agreement will not apply to the work, regardless of whether TKDA executes the purchase order in acceptance of the work. ARTICLE 8. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES A. To permit TKDA to perform the services required hereunder, the CLIENT shall supply, in proper time and sequence, the following at no expense to TKDA: 1. All necessary information regarding its requirements as necessary for orderly progress of the work. 2. Designate in writing a person to act as CLIENT's representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have authority to transmit instructions, receive instructions, receive information, and interpret and define CLIENT'S policies with respect to TKDA's services. 3. Fumish, as required for performance of TKDA's services (except to the extent provided otherwise in the Engagement Letter or any Exhibits attached thereto), data prepared by or services of others, including without limitation, soil borings, probing and subsurface explorations, hydrographic and geohydrologic surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples, materials and equipment; appropriate professional interpretations of all of the foregoing; environmental assessment and impact statements; property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic and utility surveys; property descriptions; zoning, deed and other land use restriction; and other special data not covered in the Engagement Letter or any Exhibits attached thereto. 4. Provide access to, and make all provisions for TKDA to enter upon publicly or privately owned property as required to perform the work. 5. Act as liaison with other agencies or involved parties to carry out necessary coordination and negotiations; Fumish approvals and permits from all govemmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the project. 6. Examine all reports, sketches, drawings, specifications and other documents prepared and presented by TKDA, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor or others as CLIENT deems necessary for such examination, and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of TKDA. 7. Give prompt written notice to TKDA whenever the CLIENT observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of TKDA's services or any defect in the work of Construction Contractor(s), subconsultants or TKDA. 8. Initiate action, where appropriate, to identify and investigate the nature and extent of asbestos, petroleum and/or pollution in the project and to abate and/or remove the same as may be required by federal, state or local statute, ordinance, code, rule, or regulation now existing or hereinafter enacted or amended. For purposes of this Agreement, "pollution" and "pollutant" shall mean any solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal irritant or contaminant, induding petroleum, smoke, vapor, soot, alkalis, chemicals and hazardous or toxic waste. Hazardous Materials means any substance, waste, pollutant or contaminant (including petroleum) now or hereafter included within such terms under any federal, state or local statute, ordinance, code, rule or regulation now existing or hereinafter enacted or amended. Waste further includes materials to be recycled, reconditioned or reclaimed. CLIENT further agrees it TKDA GENERAL PROVISIONS JULY 2009 (E/0) will, where appropriate, endeavor to identify, remove and/or encapsulate asbestos products, petroleum, pollutants or Hazardous Materials located in the project area prior to accomplishment by TKDA of any work on the project. If TKDA encounters, or reasonably suspects that it has encountered, asbestos or pollution in the project, TKDA shall cease activity on the project and promptly notify the CLIENT, who shall proceed as set forth above. Unless otherwise specifically provided in the Engagement Letter, the services to be provided by TKDA do not include identification of asbestos or pollution, and TKDA has no duty to identify or attempt to identify the same within the area of the project. With respect to the foregoing, CLIENT acknowledges and agrees that TKDA is not a user, handler, generator, operator, treater, storer, transporter or disposer of asbestos, petroleum, Pollutant, or other Hazardous Materials which may be encountered by TKDA on the project. CLIENT agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend TKDA and TKDA's officers, subconsultant(s), subcontractor(s), employees and agents from and against any and all claims, lawsuits, damages, liability and costs, including, but not limited to, costs of defense, arising out of or in any way connected with the presence, discharge, release, or escape of asbestos, petroleum or other Hazardous Materials or waste on the site. This indemnification is intended to apply only to existing conditions present at the site prior to TKDA's commencement of services, and does not apply to conditions that arise subsequent to TKDA's commencement of services that are caused or created by TKDA. 9. Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for the project, such legal services as the CLIENT may require or TKDA may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the project induding any that may be raised by contractor(s), such auditing service as CLIENT may require to ascertain how or for what purpose any contractor has used the monies paid under the construction contract, and such inspection services as CLIENT may require to ascertain that contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule, regulation, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. 10. Provide "record" drawings and specifications for all existing physical plants or facilities which are pertinent to the project. 11. Act promptly to approve all pay requests, Supplemental Agreements, or requests for information by TKDA as set forth herein. 12. Require all Utilities with facilities in the CLIENT'S right-of-way to locate and mark said utilities upon request, relocate and/or protect said utilities as determined necessary to accommodate work of the project, submit a schedule of the necessary relocation/protection activities to the CLIENT for review and comply with agreed upon schedule. 13. Provide other services, materials, or data as may be set forth in the Engagement Letter or any Exhibits attached thereto. B. TKDA shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of information fumished by the CLIENT. If TKDA finds that any information fumished by the CLIENT is in error or is inadequate for its purpose, TKDA shall promptly notify the CLIENT. ARTICLE 9. OPINIONS OF COST Opinions of probable project cost, construction cost, financial evaluations, feasibility studies, economic analyses of altemate solutions and utilitarian considerations of operations end maintenance costs provided for in the Engagement Letter or any Exhibits attached thereto, are made on the basis of TKDA's experience and qualifications and represent TKDA's judgment as an experienced and qualified design professional. It is recognized that TKDA does not have control over the cost of labor, material, equipment or services fumished by others or over market conditions or contractors' methods of determining their prices, and that any evaluation of any facility to be constructed, or acquired, or work to be performed on the basis of TKDA's cost opinions, must of necessity, be speculative until completion of construction or acquisition. Accordingly, TKDA does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual costs will not substantially vary from opinions, evaluations or studies submitted by TKDA to CLIENT hereunder. TKDA assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of opinions of probable project costs or construction costs, and provides these estimates for the sole convenience of the CLIENT for the purposes of general project budgeting. ARTICLE 10. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES CLIENT acknowledges that it is customary for the Architect or Engineer who is responsible for the preparation and furnishing of Drawings and Specifications and other construction -related documents to be employed to provide professional services during the Construction Phases of the project, (1) to interpret and clarify the documentation so fumished and to modify the same as circumstances revealed during bidding and construction may dictate, (2) in connection with acceptance of substitute of or -equal items of materials and equipment proposed by bidders and contractor(s), (3) in connection with review of shop drawings and sample submittals, and (4) as a result of and in response to TKDA's detecting in advance of performance of affected work inconsistencies or irregularities in such documentation. CLIENT agrees that if TKDA is not employed to provide such professional services during the Construction Phases of the project, TKDA will not be responsible for, and CLIENT shall indemnify and hold TKDA (and TKDA's professional associates and consultants) harmless from, all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of, or resulting from, any interpretation, clarification, substitution acceptance, shop drawing or sample approval or modification of such documentation issued or carried out by CLIENT or others. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall be construed to release TKDA (or TKDA's professional associates or consultants) from liability for failure to perform in accordance with professional standards any duty or responsibility which TKDA has undertaken or assumed under this Agreement. ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE TKDA shall procure and maintain insurance for protection from claims against it under workers' compensation acts, claims for damages because of bodily injury including personal injury, sickness or disease or death of any and all employees, and from claims against it for damages because of injury to or destruction of property. Also, TKDA shall procure and maintain professional liability insurance for protection from claims arising out of performance of professional services caused by any negligent act, error, or omission for which TKDA is legally liable. Certificates of insurance will be provided to the CLIENT upon request. ARTICLE 12. ASSIGNMENT This Agreement, being intended to secure the personal service of the individuals employed by and through whom TKDA performs work hereunder, shall not be assigned, sublet or transferred without the written consent of TKDA and the CLIENT. Any assignment of the Agreement, or daims arising under or relating to the Agreement without the written consent of both Parties shall be null and void. ARTICLE 13. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is to be govemed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARTICLE 14. SEVERABILITY Any provision or portion thereof in this Agreement which is held to be void or unenforceable under any law shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding between CLIENT and TKDA. ARTICLE 15. WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES CLIENT and TKDA waive consequential damages for claims, disputes or other matters in question arising out of or relating to TKDA's services under this Agreement. This mutual waiver of consequential damages applies and survives termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE 16. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY In recognition of the relative risks of CLIENT and TKDA relating to the work, CLIENT agrees, to the extent permitted by law, that TKDA's liability to the CLIENT or anyone claiming through CLIENT for any and all claims, losses, costs, or damages whatsoever arising out of, resulting from or in any way related to the Project or the Agreement from any cause or causes including, but not limited to, the negligence, professional errors or omissions, strict liability or breach of contract, or warranty express or implied, of TKDA or its officers, directors, partners, employees, agents, or consultants, or any of them, shall not exceed the total insurance proceeds paid or available on behalf of or to TKDA by its insurers in settlement or satisfaction of CLIENT's claims against TKDA under the terms and conditions of TKDA's insurance policies applicable thereto. ARTICLE 17. CONFLICT RESOLUTION In an effort to resolve any conflicts that arise during the design or construction of the project or following the completion of the project, the CLIENT and TKDA agree that all disputes between them arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation as a precondition to any formal legal proceedings. ARTICLE 18. CONFIDENTIALITY TKDA agrees to keep confidential and not to disclose to any person or entity, other than TKDA's employees, subconsultants and the general contractor and subcontractors, if appropriate, any data and information furnished to TKDA and marked CONFIDENTIAL by the CLIENT. These provisions shall not apply to information in whatever form that comes into the public domain, nor shall it restrict TKDA from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other authority with proper jurisdiction, or if it is reasonably necessary for TKDA to complete services under the Agreement or defend itself from any suit or claim. ARTICLE 19. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES If authorized in the Engagement Letter, TKDA and/or its authorized subconsultant will conduct the research that in its professional opinion is necessary and will prepare a plan indicating the locations intended for subsurface penetrations with respect to assumed locations of underground improvements. Such services by TKDA or its subconsultant will be performed in a manner consistent with the ordinary standard of care. The CLIENT recognizes that the research may not identify all underground improvements and that the information upon which TKDA relies may contain errors or may not be complete. The CLIENT agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to waive all claims and causes of action against TKDA and anyone for whom TKDA may be legally liable, for claims by CLIENT or its contractors for delay or additional compensation relating to the identification, removal, relocation, or restoration of utilities, or damages to underground improvements resulting from subsurface penetration locations established by TKDA. TKDA GENERAL PROVISIONS JULY 2009 (E10) Jodi Gallup From: Timothy A. Chalupnik <tim.chalupnik@tkda.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 8:05 AM To: Scott Johnson Subject: RE: Pinto Drive Quiet Zone Application Proposal Scott — For Task F, Revise Roadway Plans to Incorporate ASMs, we estimated $516. Tim Tim Chalupnik, PE Senior Registered Engineer 11111 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500, Saint Paul, MN 55101 P 651.292.4430 I C 612.868.6904 I tkda.com TKDA Professional Engineer: MN From: Scott Johnson [mailto:Scott.Johnson@ci.medina.mn.us] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 12:47 PM To: Timothy A. Chalupnik Cc: Contracts Group; Jeffrey A. Hilden Subject: RE: Pinto Drive Quiet Zone Application Proposal Hi Tim, Thank you for the quote for the quiet zone. I am trying to put together an apples to apples comparison for the Medina City Council. Since TKDA has completed the plans to date, you would still need to complete the plan updates if WSB completed the quiet zone application for Medina. How much would this work cost the City of Medina? Thank you, Scott Johnson City of Medina 1 Jodi Gallup From: Jim Stremel <JStremel@wsbeng.com> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 1:05 PM To: Scott Johnson Cc: Tom Kellogg; Sean Delmore Subject: FW: Follow-up Questions Regarding the Highway 55/CR 116 Project Hello Scott, See below for our fee estimate to complete the R/R quiet zone application. If you decide you want to use WSB, we can write up a more formal proposal. Thank you for the opportunity! Jim Stremel, PE Project Manager d: 763-287-8532 I c: 612-419-1549 WSB 8; Associates, Inc. 1701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB I WI)) StarTribune T];]1MAMIS This email, and any files transmitted with it. is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSR does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. if verification is required, please request a hard copy From: Sean Delmore Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 1:03 PM To: Jim Stremel Cc: Mike Shomion; Erik Seiberlich Subject: RE: Follow-up Questions Regarding the Highway 55/CR 116 Project Jim — Quiet Zone Scope: • Review crossing to evaluate if: o The Quiet Zone Risk Index is less than or equal to the Nationwide Significant Risk Threshold. o The Quiet Zone Risk Index is less than or equal to the Risk Index With Horns. • Evaluate the potential Supplementary Safety Measures proposed at the intersection. • Update the US DOT Crossing Inventory Form. • Provide a NO1 to the affected railroads. • Determine how the QZ will be established. • Prepare all necessary paperwork to provide to FRA, USDOT. MnDOT, Hennepin County and City of Medina. • Coordination meeting(s) as necessary 1 Approximate fee estimate - $7,500 Let me know if there are any questions. Sean 763-512-5248 2 Agenda Item #5H Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-XX AMENDING 2016 APPOINTMENTS AND DESIGNATIONS TO VARIOUS CITY SERVICES, AUTHORITIES, COMMISSIONS, AND AGENCIES WHEREAS, the City contracts with various consultants and businesses to provide services to the City, and WHEREAS, the City is required to appoint City representatives to City commissions as well as area jurisdictions, agencies, authorities and commissions as indicated by governing documents, State statute, or City codes. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Medina hereby amends the 2016 appointments and designations listed on Exhibit A. Dated: June 21, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-XX June 21, 2016 Scott, At this morning's meeting, there was a certain individual on the Hamel fire department that has a huge anger problem and I no longer choose to work with that individual. It's very clear why the neighboring fire departments choose not to work with them and have taken Hamel off their box alarms. Since the first of the year I have been listening to a scanner to better understand the fire calls. I have learned lots through listening to the scanner. I spoke to our public safety director as recently as yesterday and I was told there are hurt feelings with Hamel and it will take years for things to get better! I showed the public safety director 6 different alarms cases, from Hennepin county dispatch, that the surrounding fire departments answered and none of those fire chiefs have called Hamel to help! 1. Date 1-5-16 7800 Maple Hill Road trailer fire, a Loretto call, several fire departments were on scene but no Hamel. 2. Date 1-14-16 5614 94th Ave. Barn fire, a Hanover call, several fire departments were on scene but, no Hamel. 3. Date 2-12-16 21420 circle lane House fire, a Loretto call, several were on scene but, no Hamel. 4. Date 5-23-16 26080 tucker road barn fire, a Rogers tali, several departments on scene but, no Hamel. 5. Date 5-24-16 motor cafe car dealer fire, a Loretto call, there were 12 fire departments and 100 fire fighters on scene but, no Hamel. 6. Date 6-3-16 16787 39th Ave north house fire Plymouth call, several departments on scene but, no Hamel. Please understand I do not deal with Hennepin county dispatch on a regular basis and may not have all the facts perfect, but, this is accurate to the best of my ability. Back when the city of Corcoran terminated Hamel Fire's contract I was the only council member who attended the Corcoran City council meeting to ask for another chance, I was told, with all due respect, the city of Corcoran had made up the mind to terminate their contract with Hamel fire. I attended many of the merger meetings, when consolidation was talked about, (there was several thousands of dollars spent on that study) and consolidation was the best solution. The Hamel roster looks to be around 22 fire fighters and going down. The other 3 departments that serve the city of Medina have rosters around 30 and have a waiting list.. Seems like a pattern, but, Hamel still does not get it! Personally I am scared of Hamel's ability and I am tired of worrying about it! I have said in the past that I have concerns with Hamel's ability and been told it will be "ok". I'm only stepping down because I cannot make people understand the seriousness of this matter! My hope is the new liaison can make that difference. Thanks, Jeff Exhibit A Council Office/Liaisons 2016 Appointment(s) Acting Mayor Jeff Pederson Public Safety Liaison Kathleen Martin Public Works Liaison Jeff Pederson Planning & Zoning Liaison John Anderson Parks Liaison Lorie Cousineau Administration Liaison Bob Mitchell City Consultants Auditing Services Abdo Eick and Meyers LLP Building Inspector Metro West Inspection City Assessor Southwest Assessing (Rolf Erickson) City Attorney Kennedy & Graven (Ron Batty) City Engineer WSB (Tom Kellogg) Financial Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Fire Marshal Loren Kohnen Metro West Inspection (alternate) IT Cipher Laboratories (Mike Brocco) Planning Consultant Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Prosecuting Attorney Tallen & Baertschi (Steve Tallen) City Staff City Clerk Jodi Gallup City Treasurer Erin Barnhart Human Resource Officers Scott Johnson Jodi Gallup (alternate) Data Compliance Officials Scott Johnson Jodi Gallup (alternate) Ed Belland - Police Cec Vieau - Police Erin Barnhart - Finance Dusty Finke - Planning Steve Scherer - Public Works Responsible Authority for MN Government Data Practices Act Scott Johnson Jodi Gallup Zoning Administrator Dusty Finke Deb Peterson (alternate) City Committee, Agency, Commission Representatives Communities in Collaboration Council Ed Belland Elm Creek Watershed (2nd Wednesday @ 11:30 a.m., Maple Grove City Hall) Elizabeth Weir Madeleine Linck (alternate) Hamel VFD Relief Association (2nd Monday @ 8:00 p.m.) (need 2 elected officials as ex-officio members) Jeff Pederson Kathleen Martin (1st alternate) Resolution No. 2016-51 June 21, 2016 1 Exhibit A Highway 55 Corridor Coalition Joint Powers Jeff Pederson Scott Johnson (1st alternate) Lake Independence TMDL through Pioneer -Sarah Creek Watershed Hakanson Anderson Scott Johnson (alternate) Lake Sarah TMDL through Pioneer -Sarah Creek Watershed Hakanson Anderson Scott Johnson (alternate) Elm Creek TMDL through Elm Creek Watershed Hakanson Anderson Elizabeth Weir (alternate) Minnehaha Creek Watershed Elizabeth Weir Northwest Hennepin League of Municipalities (2nd Wednesday @ 6:30 p.m.) Bob Mitchell Kathleen Martin (alternate) I-94 Chamber of Commerce Jodi Gallup (alternate) Scott Johnson (alternate) Pioneer -Sarah Creek Watershed (third Thursday @ 4:00 p.m., Independence City Hall) Mike McLaughlin Pat Wulff (1st alternate) Scott Johnson (2nd alternate) Elizabeth Weir (3rd alternate) Uptown Hamel Inc. (Business Assn.) (third Tuesday @ Noon, location changes) Jeff Pederson Scott Johnson (alternate) Weed and Tree Inspector Steve Scherer Cable Franchise Liaison Judy Mallett Designation of Official Depositories & Investment of Idle Funds Farmers State Bank of Hamel 21 st Century Bank of Loretto Citigroup/Smith Barney MBIA Voyageur Asset Management Inc./(4M) Fund RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc. Designation of Official City Legal Newspaper Crow River News Planning Commission Appointments Three Year Term Chris Barry Three Year Term Robin Reid Park Commission Appointments Three Year Term Steve Lee Two Year Term Michelle Beddor Three Year Term Lisa Cole Resolution No. 2016-51 June 21, 2016 2 0 LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE EHLERS June 21, 2016 Pre -Sale Report for City of Medina, Minnesota $1,280,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A MEDINA Prepared by: Shelly Eldridge Senior Municipal Advisor And Stacie Kvilvang Senior Municipal Advisor 1 800-552-1171 I www.ehlers-inacom Executive Summary of Proposed Debt Proposed Issue: $1,280,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A Purposes: The proposed issue includes financing to Advance Crossover refund the 2018 through 2024 outstanding maturities of the City's 2008A Bonds which are callable (pre -payable) on February 1, 2017. The 2008A Bonds were originally issued to finance the Hamel Road improvements in Uptown Hamel The debt service will continue to be paid with special assessments and tax increments from the City's Tax Increment District No. 1-9. Interest rates on the 2008A Bonds proposed to be refunded are 4.00%. The refunding is expected to reduce interest expense by approximately $69,622 over the next 7 years. The Net Present Value Benefit of the refunding is estimated to be $66,306, equal to an average of 5.43% of the refunded principal. This refunding is considered an Advance Refunding as the new Bonds will be issued more than 90 days prior to the call date of the obligations being refunded. Authority: The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429, 469 and 475. Because the City assessed at least 20% of the project costs, the Bonds were issued and will continue to be a general obligation without a referendum and will not count against the City's debt limit. The debt service not paid with assessments is being paid with tax increments. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged. Term/Call Feature: The Bonds are being issued for an 8 year term. Principal on the Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2018 through 2024. Interest is payable every six months beginning February 1, 2017. The Bonds are being offered without option of prior redemption. Bank Qualification: Because the City is expecting to issue no more than $10,000,000 in tax exempt debt during the calendar year, the City will be able to designate the Bonds as "bank qualified" obligations. Bank qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds, which can result in lower interest rates. Rating: The City's most recent bond issues were rated Aa2 by Moody's Investors Service. The City will request a new rating for the Bonds. If the winning bidder on the Bonds elects to purchase bond insurance, the rating for the issue may be higher than the City's bond rating in the event that the bond rating of the insurer is higher than that of the City. Presale Report City of Medina, Minnesota June 21, 2016 Page 1 Basis for Recommendation: Based on our knowledge of your situation, your objectives communicated to us, our advisory relationship as well as characteristics of various municipal financing options, we are recommending the issuance of general obligation bonds as a suitable financing option for the following reasons: • The City's policy and past practice has been to refinance outstanding bonds with this type of debt issue. • This is a cost-effective option among the limited other options available to refinance these types of bonds. • General obligation bonds provide the lowest possible interest cost resulting the highest level of savings. Method of Sale/Placement: In order to obtain the lowest interest cost to the City, we will competitively bid the purchase of the Bonds from local and national underwriters/banks. We have included an allowance for discount bidding equal to 1.00% of the principal amount of the issue. The discount is treated as an interest item and provides the underwriter with all or a portion of their compensation in the transaction. If the Bonds are purchased at a price greater than the minimum bid amount (maximum discount), the unused allowance may be used to lower your borrowing amount. Premium Bids: Under current market conditions, most investors in municipal bonds prefer "premium" pricing structures. A premium is achieved when the coupon for any maturity (the interest rate paid by the issuer) exceeds the yield to the investor, resulting in a price paid that is greater than the face value of the bonds. The sum of the amounts paid in excess of face value is considered "reoffering premium." For this issue of Bonds we have been directed to use the premium to reduce the size of the issue. The adjustments may slightly change the true interest cost of the original bid, either up or down. You have the choice to limit the amount of premium in the bid specifications. This may result in fewer bids, but it may also eliminate large adjustments on the day of sale and other uncertainties. Other Considerations: The proceeds of the new bonds will be placed with an escrow agent who will hold the funds and pay interest on the new bonds until the call date and to prepay the old bonds at the first opportunity. The escrow account may be invested in either special government securities (SLGS) designed to fund escrows or in open market securities bid through a bidding agent. Current estimates show more savings using SLGS. The escrow will be verified by a verification agent. Review of Existing Debt: We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness for the City and find that, other than the obligations proposed to be refunded by the Bonds, there are no other refunding opportunities at this time. Presale Report City of Medina, Minnesota June 21, 2016 Page 2 We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City's outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities. Continuing Disclosure: Because the City has more than $10,000,000 in outstanding debt (including this issue) and this issue is over $1,000,000, the City will be agreeing to provide certain updated Annual Financial Information and its Audited Financial Statement annually as well as providing notices of the occurrence of certain reportable events to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the "MSRB"), as required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The City is already obligated to provide such reports for its existing bonds, and has contracted with Ehlers to prepare and file the reports. Arbitrage Monitoring: Because the Bonds are tax-exempt obligations/tax credit obligations, the City must ensure compliance with certain Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules throughout the life of the issue. These rules apply to all gross proceeds of the issue, including initial bond proceeds and investment earnings in construction, escrow, debt service, and any reserve funds. How issuers spend bond proceeds and how they track interest earnings on funds (arbitrage/yield restriction compliance) are common subjects of IRS inquiries. Your specific responsibilities will be detailed in the Tax Certificate prepared by your Bond Attorney and provided at closing. You have retained Ehlers to assist you with compliance with these rules. Risk Factors: Special Assessments: We assumed no pre -paid special assessments and we have assumed that assessments will continue to be levied as projected. If the City receives a significant amount of pre -paid assessments, it may need to increase the levy or tax increment portion of the debt service to make up for lower interest earnings than the expected assessment interest rate. Advance Refunding: The Bonds are being issued for the purpose of "advance" refunding prior City debt obligations. Only one advance refunding of an original tax-exempt debt obligation is permitted under current IRS rules. This refunding is being undertaken based in part on the following assumptions: • Since the new Bonds will extend the "call" date for this debt, we are assuming that the City does not expect to have revenues available to pre -pay the current obligations prior to this new call date. • That advance refunding the 2008A will provide an overall lower debt cost as compared to waiting to refund the issue until its call date Other Service Providers: This debt issuance will require the engagement of other public finance service providers. This section identifies those other service providers, so Ehlers can coordinate their engagement on your behalf. Where you have previously used a particular firm to provide a service, we have assumed that you will continue that relationship. For services you have not previously required, we have identified a service provider. Fees charged by these service providers will be paid from proceeds of the obligation, unless you notify us that you wish to pay them from other sources. Our pre -sale bond sizing includes a good faith estimate of these fees, so their final fees may vary. If you have any questions Presale Report City of Medina, Minnesota June 21, 2016 Page 3 pertaining to the identified service providers or their role, or if you would like to use a different service provider for any of the listed services please contact us. Bond Attorney: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Paying Agent: Bond Trust Services Corporation Rating Agency: Moody's Investors Service CPA Escrow Verification Agent: Barthe & Wahrman Escrow Agent: U.S. Bank This presale report summarizes our understanding of the City's objectives for the structure and terms of this financing as of this date. As additional facts become known or capital markets conditions change, we may need to modify the structure and/or terms of this financing to achieve results consistent with the City's objectives. Presale Report City of Medina, Minnesota June 21, 2016 Page 4 Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule Pre -Sale Review by City Council: June 21, 2016 Distribute Official Statement: Week of July 4, 2016 Conference with Rating Agency: Between July 6 and 11, 2016 City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds: July 19, 2016 Estimated Closing Date: August 11, 2016 Redemption Date for Bond February 1, 2017 Attachments Sources and Uses of Funds Proposed Debt Service Schedule Refunding Savings Analysis Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed With Bond Sale Ehlers Contacts Municipal Advisors: Shelly Eldridge (651) 697-8504 Stacie Kvilvang (651) 697-8506 Disclosure Coordinator: Elizabeth Greiter (651) 697-8550 Financial Analyst: Alicia Gage (651) 697-8551 The Official Statement for this financing will be provided to the City Council at their home or e-mail address for review prior to the sale date. 0 Presale Report City of Medina, Minnesota June 21, 2016 Page 5 City of Medina, Minnesota $1,280,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A Issue Summary - Proposed Crossover Refunding of 2008A G.O. Bonds Assuming Current G.O. BQ "Aa2" Market Rates plus 15bps Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 08/11/2016 I Delivered 08/11/2016 Xover Ref 08A - Xover Ref Xover Ref Special 08A - TIF 08A - Tax Assessement/ Revenue Increment Issue Levy (429) (429) (469) Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds Total Sources Uses Of Funds $695,000.00 $195,000.00 $390,000.00 $1,280,000.00 $695,000.00 $195,000.00 $390,000.00 $1,280,000.00 Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000%) Costs of Issuance Deposit to Crossover Escrow Fund Rounding Amount Total Uses 6,950.00 22,533.20 663,595.49 1,921.31 $695,000.00 1,950.00 3,900.00 6,322.26 12,644.54 185,225.30 376,671.88 1,502.44 (3,216.42) $195,000.00 $390,000.00 12,800.00 41,500.00 1,225,492.67 207.33 $1,280,000.00 Series 2016A GO Ref Bonds I Issue Summary 16/ 3/2016 11:37 PM 0 LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE EHLERS City of Medina, Minnesota $1,280,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A Issue Summary - Proposed Crossover Refunding of 2008A G.O. Bonds Assuming Current G.O. BQ "Aa2" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 08/ 11 /2016 - - - 02/01/2017 - 7,946.32 7,946.32 7,946.32 08/01/2017 - 8,413.75 8,413.75 02/01/2018 175,000.00 1.000% 8,413.75 183,413.75 191,827.50 08/01/2018 - 7,538.75 7,538.75 02/01/2019 175,000.00 1.150% 7,538.75 182,538.75 190,077.50 08/01/2019 - 6,532.50 6,532.50 02/01/2020 175,000.00 1.200% 6,532.50 181,532.50 188,065.00 08/01 /2020 - 5,482.50 5,482.50 02/01/2021 185,000.00 1.300% 5,482.50 190,482.50 195,965.00 08/01 /2021 - 4,280.00 4,280.00 02/01/2022 185,000.00 1.400% 4,280.00 189,280.00 193,560.00 08/01 /2022 - 2,985.00 2,985.00 02/01/2023 190,000.00 1.500% 2,985.00 192,985.00 195,970.00 08/01 /2023 - 1,560.00 1,560.00 02/01/2024 195,000.00 1.600% 1,560.00 196,560.00 198,120.00 Total $1,280,000.00 $81,531.32 $1,361,531.32 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars Average Life Average Coupon Net Interest Cost (NIC) True Interest Cost (TIC) Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes All Inclusive Cost (AIC) IRS Form 8038 $5,824.44 4.550 Years 1.3998128% 1.6195763% 1.6278937% 1.3977429% 2.3958429% Net Interest Cost Weighted Average Maturity Series 2016A GO Ref Bonds I Issue Summary 16/ 3/2016 11:37 PM l .3998128% 4.550 Years 0 LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE EHLERS City of Medina, Minnesota $1,280,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A Issue Summary - Proposed Crossover Refunding of 2008A G.O. Bonds Assuming Current G.O. BQ "Aa2" Market Rates plus 15bps Net Debt Service Schedule Const Loan Fiscal Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Pmt Existing D/S Net New D/S Total 08/11/2016 - - - - (207.33) 02/01/2017 - 7,946.32 7,946.32 (1,227,946.32) 1,244,400.00 24,400.00 24,192.67 08/01/2017 - 8,413.75 8,413.75 - - 8,413.75 02/01/2018 175,000.00 1.000% 8,413.75 183,413.75 - - 183,413.75 191,827.50 08/01/2018 7,538.75 7,538.75 7,538.75 02/01/2019 175,000.00 1.150% 7,538.75 182,538.75 - - 182,538.75 190,077.50 08/01/2019 6,532.50 6,532.50 6,532.50 02/01/2020 175,000.00 1.200% 6,532.50 181,532.50 - - 181,532.50 188,065.00 08/01/2020 - 5,482.50 5,482.50 - - 5,482.50 02/01/2021 185,000.00 1.300% 5,482.50 190,482.50 - - 190,482.50 195,965.00 08/01/2021 - 4,280.00 4,280.00 - - 4,280.00 02/01/2022 185,000.00 1.400% 4,280.00 189,280.00 189,280.00 193,560.00 08/01/2022 - 2,985.00 2,985.00 - 2,985.00 02/01/2023 190,000.00 1.500% 2,985.00 192,985.00 - 192,985.00 195,970.00 08/01/2023 - 1,560.00 1,560.00 1,560.00 02/01/2024 195,000.00 1.600% 1,560.00 196,560.00 - - 196,560.00 198,120.00 Total $1,280,000.00 - $81,531.32 $1,361,531.32 (1,227,946.32) $1,244,400.00 $1,377,777.67 Series 2016A GO Ref Bonds I Issue Summary 16/ 3/2016 11:37 PM ellLEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE EHLERS City of Medina, Minnesota $695,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A Xover Ref 08A - Special Assessement/Levy (429) Assuming Current G.O. BQ "Aa2" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Comparison Const Loan Existing Net New Date Total P+I Pmt D/S D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2017 4,303.13 (664,924.13) 673,833.42 11,291.11 13,212.42 1,921.31 02/01/2018 109,112.50 - 109,112.50 112,422.84 3,310.34 02/01/2019 103,112.50 103,112.50 108,982.92 5,870.42 02/01/2020 102,020.00 102,020.00 109,452.00 7,432.00 02/01/2021 105,880.00 105,880.00 109,764.72 3,884.72 02/01/2022 104,580.00 104,580.00 109,921.08 5,341.08 02/01/2023 103,180.00 103,180.00 109,921.08 6,741.08 02/01 /2024 106,680.00 106,680.00 109,764.72 3,084.72 Total $738,868.13 (664,924.13) $673,833.42 $745,856.11 $783,441.78 $37,585.67 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 1.398%(Bond Yield) Contingency or Rounding Amount Net Present Value Benefit Net PV Benefit / $724,434.04 PV Refunded Debt Service Net PV Benefit / $660,621 Refunded Principal... Net PV Benefit / $695,000 Refunding Principal.. Refunding Bond Information 33,768.16 33,768.16 1,921.31 $35,689.47 4.927% 5.402% 5.135% Refunding Dated Date 8/11/2016 Refunding Delivery Date 8/ 11 /2016 Series 2016A GO Ref Bonds I Xover Ref 08A - Special A 16/ 3/2016 11:37 PM EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE City of Medina, Minnesota $195,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A Xover Ref 08A - TIF Revenue (429) Assuming Current G.O. BQ "Aa2" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Comparison Const Loan Existing Net New Date Total P+I Pmt D/S D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2017 1,217.15 (185,596.15) 188,066.58 2,185.14 3,687.58 1,502.44 02/01/2018 27,577.50 - 27,577.50 31,377.16 3,799.66 02/01/2019 27,327.50 27,327.50 30,417.08 3,089.58 02/01/2020 27,040.00 27,040.00 30,548.00 3,508.00 02/01/2021 31,740.00 - 31,740.00 30,635.28 (1,104.72) 02/01/2022 31,350.00 - 31,350.00 30,678.92 (671.08) 02/01/2023 30,930.00 - 30,930.00 30,678.92 (251.08) 02/01/2024 30,480.00 - 30,480.00 30,635.28 155.28 Total $207,662.15 (185,596.15) $188,066.58 $208,630.14 $218,658.22 $10,028.08 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 1.398%(Bond Yield) Contingency or Rounding Amount Net Present Value Benefit Net PV Benefit / $202,189.19 PV Refunded Debt Service Net PV Benefit / $184,379 Refunded Principal... Net PV Benefit / $195,000 Refunding Principal.. Refunding Bond Information 8,364.34 8,364.34 1,502.44 $9,866.78 4.880% 5.351 % 5.060% Refunding Dated Date 8/11/2016 Refunding Delivery Date 8/11/2016 Series 2016A GO Ref Bonds I Xover Ref 08A - TIF Reven 16/ 3/2016 11:37 PM EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE City of Medina, Minnesota $390,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A Xover Ref 08A - Tax Increment (469) Assuming Current G.O. BQ "Aa2" Market Rates plus 15bps Debt Service Comparison Const Loan Existing Net New Date Total P+I Pmt D/S D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2017 2,426.04 (377,426.04) 382,500.00 10,716.42 7,500.00 (3,216.42) 02/01/2018 55,137.50 - 55,137.50 60,000.00 4,862.50 02/01/2019 59,637.50 59,637.50 63,200.00 3,562.50 02/01/2020 59,005.00 - 59,005.00 61,200.00 2,195.00 02/01/2021 58,345.00 58,345.00 64,200.00 5,855.00 02/01/2022 57,630.00 57,630.00 62,000.00 4,370.00 02/01/2023 61,860.00 61,860.00 64,800.00 2,940.00 02/01/2024 60,960.00 60,960.00 62,400.00 1,440.00 Total $415,001.04 (377,426.04) $382,500.00 $423,291.42 $445,300.00 $22,008.58 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 1.398%(Bond Yield) Contingency or Rounding Amount Net Present Value Benefit Net PV Benefit / $411,580.96 PV Refunded Debt Service Net PV Benefit / $375,000 Refunded Principal... Net PV Benefit / $390,000 Refunding Principal.. Refunding Bond Information 23,965.91 23,965.91 (3,216.42) $20,749.49 5.041 5.533% 5.320% Refunding Dated Date 8/11/2016 Refunding Delivery Date 8/ 11 /2016 Series 2016A GO Ref Bonds I Xover Ref 08A - Tax Incre 16/ 3/2016 11:37 PM EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Resolution No. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution Providing for the Sale of $1,280,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $1,280,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A (the "Bonds"), to advance crossover refund the outstanding maturities of the City's General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008A for interest cost savings; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent municipal advisor for the Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the [Jurisdiction Type] for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on July 19, 2016, for the purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by City Council Member and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following City Council Members voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 21st day of June, 2016. City Clerk Agenda Item #7A2 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016- RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SALE OF $1,280,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS; SERIES 2016A WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $1,280,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2016A (the "Bonds"), to advance crossover refund the outstanding maturities of the City's General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008A for interest cost savings; and WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent municipal advisor for the Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the municipality with the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on July 19, 2016, for the purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. Dated: June 21, 2016 Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution 2016- June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #8A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 15, 2016 MEETING: June 21, 2016 City Council SUBJ: Deerhill Preserve (formerly Stonegate) CD-PUD Final Plat; Right -of -Way Vacation; Deerhill Road Public Improvement Project Background On October 6, 2015, the City Council granted preliminary approval to Property Resources Development Corporation for the Stonegate Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD). On that date, the Council adopted Ordinance 588 and Resolution 2015-85, granting preliminary plat approval and approving the CD-PUD rezoning subject to a number of conditions. The approved preliminary plat included 41 single family homes and approximately 90 acres of permanent conservation area to be protected with a conservation easement. The applicant has now requested final approval of the plat. The applicant proposes to develop the property in phases, with this initial plat to include 10 of the single family lots on the northeast portion of the site. Outlots B, C, E, F, I, K, and N include the Conservation Area and will be protected by a permanent conservation easement dedicated to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Outlot A is proposed to be deeded to the City and includes additional conservation area. Outlots D, G, H, J, L, and M are intended to be replatted to include the remaining 31 lots in future phases. The Developer has also requested that the City vacate much of the right-of-way which they believe exists on their property for Deerhill Road which is located along the section line. The section line bisects some of their lots as well as some of the conservation areas. The City Council reviewed the Plat and Easement Vacation at the April meeting and directed staff to prepare approval documents, subject to the applicant finalizing documentation related to the Conservation Easement with Minnehaha Creek and also finalizing the Development Agreement. The Conservation Easement and Land Stewardship Plan were provided at the June 7 meeting and if you would like a copy, please let staff know. The resolutions related to final plat and right-of-way vacation approval are attached for review and potential action. The Applicant has requested that the City Council consider a reduction in the required park dedication for the development in recognition of the permanently protected Conservation Area. This subject will be further discussed below. The Applicant has requested that the City construct Deerhill Road and turn lane improvements on Homestead Trail as a public improvement project, the cost of which will be fully assessed against the property within the development. The City had previously agreed to construct the main access road through a public improvement project. Documents related to the public Deerhill Preserve Page 1 of 3 June 21, 2016 Final Plat; ROW Vacation; Public Improvement Project City Council Meeting improvement project are described later in this report and are attached for consideration and action. Final Plat/Development Agreement/Park Dedication Staff has had a number of discussions with the applicant related to the various requirements in the Development Agreement and have been able to come to an agreement on most items. Throughout the review process, the applicant has requested that the City consider a reduction in the required park dedication for the development in recognition of the permanently protected Conservation Area. The Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD) ordinance allows for such a reduction. The reduction would be at the full discretion of the City Council and only within the context of the CD-PUD subdivision. If the City Council supports the CD-PUD subdivision, staff believes the flexibility on park dedication is a good incentive for the project. On the other hand, staff recognizes that the substantial density increase has been justified by the conservation area and that there is risk of "double dipping." Staff and the applicant discussed the possibility of considering the park dedication fee based on what would be expected in a conventional Rural Residential development. For example, if the fee were based on base density of the site (rather than the full CD-PUD density) of 221ots and only on the area outside of the conservation easement. Staff and the developer have discussed numerous approaches and various numbers. In the end, the parties concluded that the best approach was to agree on a specific number based on the City's inherent flexibility under the CD-PUD ordinance. That number is $102,000. For the sake of comparison, the full park dedication requirement which has been discussed through the preliminary plat process was: 1) Deeding of outlot A (1.77 acre) 2) Granting trail easements throughout conservation area (2.9 acre) 3) Fee of $178,636.42 Staff believes the framework for flexibility discussed above is reasonable if the City Council believes park dedication flexibility is warranted to support the CD-PUD project. In such a case, staff would recommend that condition 10 be updated to: "The Developer shall deed Outlot A to the City for parks, trails, and open space purposes. In lieu of dedicating additional property, the Developer shall pay a park dedication fee -in - lieu of $102,000. Deerhill Road Public Improvement Project The applicant has submitted a feasibility report and plans and specifications related to the construction of Deerhill Road and the Homestead Trail turn lane. The City Engineer has reviewed and provided a number of comments in order to prepare them for the public bidding process. Deerhill Preserve Page 2 of 3 June 21, 2016 Final Plat; ROW Vacation; Public Improvement Project City Council Meeting The applicant will be required to enter into a petition and waiver agreement with the City in order for the City to undertake the public improvement project. This document waives the need for any formal hearings on the project or the assessments of the costs against the property. However, the City still needs to take the normal actions of the public improvement process. This includes accepting the feasibility report, ordering the project, approving plans and specifications and advertising for bids. A resolution conducting these activities is attached for action. At future meetings, the City will accept bids and enter into a contract related to the project and will ultimately adopt an assessment roll. In the intervening time, the City will also be selling bonds to finance the project. Staff Recommendation 1. Motion to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Deerhill Preserve 2. Motion to approve the conservation design -planned unit development agreement by and between the City of Medina and Property Resources Development Corporation for Deerhill Preserve 3. Motion to adopt the resolution vacating a portion of the Deerhill Road right-of-way approximately one-half mile west of Willow Drive 4. Motion to adopt the ordinance establishing the Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District 5. Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing the publication of the Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District by title and summary 6. Motion to adopt the resolution regarding the 2016 Deerhill Road Extension public improvement project Attachments 1. Engineering Comments 2. Final Plat Resolution 3. Resolution approving right-of-way vacation 4. Ordinance establishing Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District 5. Resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 6. Resolution regarding the 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Public Improvement Project 7. Development Agreement 8. Feasibility Report for 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Public Improvement Project 9. 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Public Improvement Project Plans 10. Final Plat of Deerhill Preserve received by the City on June 9, 2016 11. Construction plans for Deerhill Preserve received by the City on May 3, 2016 Deerhill Preserve Page 3 of 3 June 21, 2016 Final Plat; ROW Vacation; Public Improvement Project City Council Meeting DRAFT CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MEDINA AND PROPERTY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR DEERHILL PRESERVE This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 (RHB) 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Zoning; Number of Units; Phased Development 1 2. Right to Proceed 2 3 Plans; Improvements; Subdivision Density 3 4. Erosion Control 3 5. Site Grading; Haul Routes 4 6. Construction of Subdivision Improvements 5 7. Streets 6 8. Septic Systems and Wells 9 9. Stormwater Improvements 9 10. Landscaping Plan 10 11. Street Lighting and Signs 11 12. Conservation Easement; Land Stewardship Plan 11 13. Letter of Credit 12 14. Homeowners' Association 13 15. Upland Buffer Easement 13 16. Official Controls 14 17. Park Dedication Requirements 14 18. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection 14 19. Developer's Default 15 20. Insurance 15 21. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy 15 22. Clean up and Dust Control 16 23. Compliance with Laws 16 24. Agreement Runs With the Land 16 25. Indemnification 16 26. Assignment 16 27. Notices 17 28. Severability 17 29. Non -waiver 17 30. Counterparts 18 31. Estoppel Certificate; Partial Release 18 SIGNATURES 19-20 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT F EXHIBIT G EXHIBIT H EXHIBIT I EXHIBIT J LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY LIST OF PLAN DOCUMENTS FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT FORM OF LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE LAND STEWARDSHIP PLAN FORM OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 This Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2016 by and between the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the "City"), and Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Stonegate Farm, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Owner") is the fee owner of the real property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the City rezoned the Property to Conservation Design - Planned Unit Development District ("CD-PUD"), approved the Deerhill Preserve Oka Stonegate) Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development General Plan of Development (the "CD-PUD General Plan") and granted preliminary approval of the plat of Deerhill Preserve (fka Stonegate) (the "Subdivision"); and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to develop the Subdivision with 41 single-family residential dwellings; and WHEREAS, the Owner and the Developer have requested final approval of the plat of Deerhill Preserve; and WHEREAS, the CD-PUD General Plan and approval of the final plat of Deerhill Preserve are contingent upon the Developer and the City entering into an agreement for development of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Zoning; Number of Units; Phased Development. a) Subject to execution of this Agreement and recording the final plat of Deerhill Preserve, the Property has been zoned Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development and may be developed with no more than 41 single family dwellings. Forty-one units represent a significant increase in the density which was allowed under the previous zoning designation and was approved because the City, based on the plans submitted by the Developer, determined that the Subdivision, with its conservation area and other features, met the intent and purposes of the City's conservation design ordinance. Approval of the 41 units is strictly conditioned upon the Developer's compliance with all terms and conditions of City Ordinance No. 588, the CD-PUD General Plan and this Agreement. The Developer intends to develop the Subdivision in a number of phases. The plat of Deerhill Preserve encompasses all of the Property, including the platting of 10 of the 41 lots as the Developer's first phase ("Phase I"). Some of the Outlots within Deerhill Preserve will be replatted in the future to create the remaining 31 lots as identified on the preliminary plat and in accordance with the terms and conditions of preliminary plat approval (hereinafter individually referred to as a "Phase" and collectively as "Phases"). 1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 b) This Agreement pertains to all of the Property and will be recorded against the same but certain provisions herein will relate more specifically to the 10 lots in Phase I. The City and the Developer intend to enter into additional development agreements with each subsequent Phase of the Subdivision which will relate more specifically to the lots and other development matters within each future Phase. 2. Right to Proceed. The Developer may not construct public or private improvements or any buildings within the Subdivision until all the following conditions precedent have been satisfied: a) the final plat of Deerhill Preserve has been filed with Hennepin County; b) this Agreement has been executed by the Developer and the City; c) the required Letter of Credit (as hereinafter defined) has been received by the City from or on behalf of the Developer; d) final engineering and construction plans in digital form regarding the Subdivision Improvements (as hereinafter defined) have been submitted by the Developer and approved by the City engineer; e) the Developer has reimbursed the City for all legal, engineering and administrative expenses incurred to date by the City regarding the Subdivision and has deposited with the City the additional inspection escrow required by this Agreement; f) the Developer and the City have entered into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C; g) the Developer has executed the Upland Buffer Easement Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E; h) the Developer has submitted the storm sewer improvement tax district disclosure statement required by this Agreement; i) the Developer has provided to the City a warranty deed for Outlot A as required by this Agreement; j) the Developer has submitted and the City has approved the certified grading plan; k) the Developer has submitted to the City plans and specifications for the Public Improvements (as hereinafter defined) deemed satisfactory by the City for solicitation for bids under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; 1) the City has received all required permits from Hennepin county to complete the Public Improvements; m) the Developer and the Holder (as hereinafter defined) have executed a Conservation Easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F; n) all erosion control measures are in place; o) the Developer has received all required permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and any other entity having jurisdiction over the Subdivision; p) the Developer has executed the right-of-way easement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit I; q) the Developer has executed the License Agreement for Maintenance substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G; 2 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 r) the Owner has executed the Petition and Waiver Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit J. s) the Developer or the Developer's engineer has initiated and attended a preconstruction meeting with the City engineer and staff; and t) the City has issued a notice that all conditions precedent have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed to construct the improvements contemplated by this Agreement. 3. Plans; Improvements; Subdivision Density. a) The Developer agrees to develop the Subdivision in accordance with the CD-PUD General Plan, City Ordinance No. 588, the terms and conditions of City resolution 2016- granting final plat approval (collectively, the "City Approvals") and this Agreement. The City Approvals are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement and made a part hereof. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the City Approvals and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. The Developer also agrees to construct all required private improvements within the Subdivision in accordance with the approved engineering and construction plans (collectively, the "Plans"). The documents which constitute the Plans are those on file with and approved by the City and are listed on Exhibit B attached hereto. The Plans may not be modified by the Developer without the prior written approval of the City. b) In developing the Subdivision in accordance with the Plans for Phase I, the Developer shall make or install at its sole expense the following private improvements (collectively, the "Subdivision Improvements"): 1. site grading (including grading within what will be the Deerhill Road public right of way) and erosion controls; 2. stormwater improvements, including related pipes, structures and dry creek bed; 3. upland buffers; 4. restoration work in Phase I of the Conservation Area and wetland mitigation; 5. street lighting and Boulevard Landscaping (as hereinafter defined); and 6. retaining walls at entrance off Homestead Trail. c) All work performed by or on behalf of the Developer on or related to the construction of the Subdivision Improvements shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. Work related to construction of the houses within the Subdivision shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. 4. Erosion Control. a) All construction regarding the Subdivision Improvements shall be conducted in a manner designed to control erosion and in compliance with all City ordinances and other requirements, including the City's 2014 permit with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding its municipal separate storm sewer system program. Following the delivery of reasonable written notice to the Developer, the City may impose 3 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 reasonable, additional erosion control requirements after the City's initial approval if the City deems such necessary due to imminent risk of uncontrolled erosion. All areas disturbed by the excavation shall be reseeded promptly after the completion of the work in that area unless construction of streets, private utilities, buildings or other improvements is anticipated immediately thereafter. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. b) If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions issued by the City, the City may take such action as it deems reasonably appropriate to control erosion based on the urgency of the situation. The City agrees to provide reasonable notice to the Developer in advance of any proposed action, including notice by telephone or email in the case of emergencies, but limited notice by the City when emergency conditions so require will not affect the Developer's obligations or the City's rights hereunder. c) The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses it incurs in connection with any action it takes to control erosion. No grading or construction of the Subdivision Improvements will be allowed and no building permits will be issued within the Subdivision unless the Developer is in full compliance with Developer's responsibilities to comply with the erosion control requirements provided herein. The erosion control measures specified in the Plans or otherwise required within the Property shall be binding on the Developer and its successors and assigns. 5. Site Grading; Haul Routes. a) In order to construct the Subdivision Improvements and otherwise prepare the Property for development, it will be necessary for the Developer to grade the Property based on the approved Plans and specifications for the Subdivision. All site and other grading must be done in compliance with the Plans. The City may withhold issuance of a building permit for any structure within the Subdivision until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as reasonably determined by the City. Within 30 days after completion of the grading, or such other period acceptable to the City's engineer, the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan and a certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer. b) The Developer agrees that construction traffic and any fill material which must be brought to or removed from the Property while grading or during construction of the Subdivision Improvements or any buildings within the Subdivision will be transported using the haul route established by the City. The City will also require its contractor for the Public Improvements to use the haul route. The City designates Deerhill Road to Homestead Trail to Co. Rd. 6 as the haul route. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors and all parties constructing the Subdivision Improvements or homes within the Subdivision using heavy vehicles are specifically prohibited from using that portion of Deerhill Road between the eastern boundary of the Property and Willow Drive for these purposes. Due to existing road conditions, the City intends to post the portion of Deerhill Road from the eastern boundary of the Property to Willow Drive to limit 4 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 access to vehicles of 4-ton axle weight or less. In addition, the Developer agrees to use its best efforts to encourage all other construction vehicles to avoid utilizing existing Deerhill Road. c) The Developer will rough grade the Subdivision as part of the Subdivision Improvements but expects that it will be necessary for builders to custom grade individual lots based on the specific design and location of the homes to be constructed thereon. The City will require a grading plan to be submitted with each building permit for a home or any structure and will review the individual grading plans to ensure they are not in conflict with or pose a threat to adjacent parcels. It may be necessary for building permit grading plans to include abutting properties to verify the proposed grading does not adversely affect them. 6. Construction of Subdivision Improvements. a) All Subdivision Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the Plans, this Agreement, the City's subdivision regulations, and the requirements of the letters from the City engineer dated , and The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for the Subdivision Improvements prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Developer shall obtain any necessary permits from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and any other agency having jurisdiction over the Subdivision before proceeding with construction. The Developer shall also comply with the requirements of the letter from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District dated . The City shall inspect all work at the Developer's expense. The Developer and its contractors and subcontractors shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. Prior to beginning construction, the Developer or the Developer's engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with all parties concerned, including the City staff and engineers, to review the program for the construction work. b) Within 45 days after the completion of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" plans and three complete sets of paper "as constructed" plans, each prepared in accordance with City standards and in AutoCAD format based on Hennepin County coordinates. Stormwater "as constructed" plans shall also be submitted to the City in GIS format compatible with ArcMap 10.3 in the coordinates and with the attributes directed by the City engineer. Iron monuments must be installed in the Subdivision in accordance with state law. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. Subject to events of force majeure, all Subdivision Improvements required by this Agreement shall be completed by no later than August 1, 2018, except as specifically noted otherwise in this Agreement. For purposes of this section, completion of the restoration work in Phase I of the Conservation Area means completion of the plantings but does not include establishment of the vegetation. c) The Developer agrees to reimburse the City fully for the reasonable cost of all Subdivision Improvement repairs or replacement if the cost thereof exceeds the remaining amount of the Letter of Credit. Such reimbursement must be made within 45 days of the date upon which the City notifies the Developer of the cost due under this section. The City's notice shall include reasonable back up documentation to support such expenses. If the Developer fails to make required payments to the City, the Developer hereby consents to the City levying special 5 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 assessments for any unreimbursed amount associated with such costs against the lots within the Subdivision except those which have been sold to homeowners. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges the benefit to the lots within the Subdivision of the repair or replacement of the Subdivision Improvements and hereby consents to such assessment and waives the right to a hearing or notice of hearing or any appeal thereon under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. d) No building permit shall be issued for structures within the Subdivision until adequate street access is available to the lot in question. If building permits are issued prior to the completion of all Subdivision Improvements and Public Improvements serving any lot, the final wear course of bituminous excepted, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of the Public Improvements and damage to the Public Improvements caused by the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No temporary or permanent certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any structure within the Subdivision until all Subdivision Improvements and Public Improvements that are required for the operation of such structure have been completed, except for the final wear course of bituminous on Deerhill Road and restoration work in future Phases of the Construction Area. 7. Streets. a) The plat of Deerhill Preserve dedicated right-of-way for Deerhill Road to serve the Property from Homestead Trail to the eastern boundary of the Property. The Developer has requested, and the City has agreed, to construct the extension of Deerhill Road that is necessary to serve the Property. The extension of Deerhill Road includes construction of the roadway, conduit crossings for small utilities, and the Homestead Trail turn lane improvements required by Hennepin County (collectively, the "Public Improvements"). The City has agreed to construct the Public Improvements under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The Developer agrees to sign a Petition and Waiver Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit J, which will provide that the City may specially assess 100 percent of the cost of the Public Improvements against the Property. The amount to be specially assessed for said work shall be 100 percent of the actual cost, estimated at approximately $1,085,720, and shall be spread equally among the 41 lots in the Subdivision pursuant to the terms of the Petition and Waiver Agreement. Such assessed costs shall also include all costs incurred by the City in constructing the Public Improvements, including legal, engineering, and other consulting fees and the cost of bond issuance and ongoing bond administrative fees. The Developer agrees to take no action which would cause the Property to be eligible for deferral of the special assessments beyond the 12-year deferral specified herein. Any such action by or on behalf of the Developer shall be an Event of Default under this Agreement and shall cause the special assessments to be due and payable immediately. The City's right to specially assess the Property for the cost of the Public Improvements shall expire if the City has not initiated the project by December 31, 2017. b) If the Public Improvements are initiated prior to completion of all lots within the Subdivision, 1/41st of the above amount will be levied against each of the lots which have been final platted at that time and the balance will be assessed against the remainder of the Property. These assessments will be levied as requested by the Developer (including levying of the assessments against less than all of the outlots within the Subdivision) unless the City determines, in the reasonable exercise of its discretion, that the proposed allocation threatens the 6 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 City's ability to recover the assessed amounts. Upon approval of additional Phases, the special assessments levied against the outlots may be reapportioned pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.071 at the Developer's request. c) The City and the Developer have executed an agreement dated May 24, 2016 (the "Reimbursement Agreement") for the purpose of reimbursing the City for any expenses it incurs in connection with the Chapter 429 process associated with constructing the Public Improvements. The Developer escrowed $25,000 with the City pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement. Upon execution of the Petition and Waiver Agreement by the Developer, the City will cease attributing costs associated with the Chapter 429 process to the Reimbursement Agreement escrow amount and will include subsequent costs among the costs of the Public Improvements to be assessed against the Property. Any unspent escrow funds will be returned by the City to the Developer in accordance with the Reimbursement Agreement within 30 days of execution of the Petition and Waiver Agreement by the Developer. d) Cul-de-sacs. The Developer shall be responsible for building the future cul-de- sacs which are identified on the CD-PUD General Plan. Such improvements shall be private street improvements and the City shall not be responsible for any maintenance of such private improvements. The Developer acknowledges that the design of any such cul-de-sac is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the Fire Marshal to ensure adequate circulation and emergency vehicle access in compliance with all applicable law. The Developer and its successors and assigns shall be responsible for removal of all snow and ice and all maintenance, repair and reconstruction of the private streets (which will be installed by the Developer in further phases of the Subdivision). e) The southwestern portion of Deerhill Road connects to Homestead Trail over property owned by the Owner but located in the city of Orono. It is a condition precedent to the right to proceed with development of the Subdivision that the City be granted an easement for right-of-way purposes by the Owner for the portion of Deerhill Road in Orono. The form of the Right -of -Way Easement is attached hereto as Exhibit I. It is also a condition precedent to the Developer's right to proceed with development of the Subdivision that the city of Orono issue a conditional use permit to the City with conditions reasonably acceptable to the City and the Developer and any other permit or approval deemed necessary by the city of Orono regarding construction, control and maintenance of all of Deerhill Road as a City public street. f) It is possible that land located in Orono south of the Property and owned by the Owner may be developed in the future and that lots created from such land may use Deerhill Road for access. Upon completion of Deerhill Road, the City will be responsible for the routine maintenance and the periodic maintenance, repair and replacement necessary of the road. This may result in the City seeking to recover some or all of the cost of such work pursuant to City policy by means of special assessments levied under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Orono has indicated that even if lots located within Orono are accessed by means of Deerhill Road, Orono will not share the cost of such work and will not specially assess any land within Orono even if benefited by such improvement. In light of Orono's position, the City will be forced to fund all work performed on Deerhill Road itself or recoup some or all of such expenses through special assessments against the Property. The Developer, for itself and its successors and 7 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 assigns, acknowledges that the City may be required to specially assess the costs to maintain, repair or replace Deerhill Road against the lots within the Property even if some portion of said work occurs within Orono and is of benefit to properties within Orono served by Deerhill Road. The Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges the benefit to the Property for such work regarding Deerhill Road and hereby consents to the special assessment of the lots within the Subdivision for such additional portion of the cost of said improvements which might otherwise have been levied against lots within Orono served by Deerhill Road and waives the right to a hearing or notice of hearing on any appeal thereon under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 regarding the City's inclusion of costs associated with that portion of Deerhill Road in Orono. The above is not intended to be a complete waiver of the rights of the Developer or its successors or assigns to appeal such assessment or indicate that the City will not fairly and equitably assess other lands within Medina which are also benefited by such improvements. g) The Developer desires to construct two landscape islands in the Deerhill Road right-of-way and to plant grasses up to the edge of the pavement of Deerhill Road rather than providing the typical three-foot gravel shoulder and trees and shrubs elsewhere within the right- of-way (collectively, the "Boulevard Landscaping"). The Boulevard Landscaping involves plantings within the Deerhill Road right-of-way closer to the pavement than is typically allowed. These practices are intended to be consistent with other flexibilities permitted under the Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development Ordinance. The Developer agrees to maintain all such landscaping in a neat and safe manner The City shall have no responsibility for said maintenance. The Developer recognizes that the location of the landscaping, particularly the grasses immediately adjacent to the paved surface of Deerhill Road and trees and shrubs within the right-of-way is likely to result in damage to the Boulevard Landscaping in the normal course of City snowplowing and other maintenance activities. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, hereby releases the City from any liability for destruction of or damage to said landscaping and grasses within the right-of-way for Deerhill Road and shall be responsible for all repair or replacement itself. The City is willing to allow the Developer to make use of the public right-of-way as described herein by means of a License Agreement for Maintenance which recognizes the priority of the public's rights within the right-of-way in the event there is a need to make use of such area in the future for any purpose consistent with a public right-of-way. The form of the License Agreement for Maintenance is attached hereto as Exhibit G and the Developer agrees to enter into such agreement. h) The Developer reserves the right, subsequent to execution of this Agreement but prior to award by the City of a contract for the Public Improvements, to opt to construct the elements of the Public Improvements as part of the Subdivision Improvements. Should the Developer exercise such option, it shall notify the City immediately in writing. Upon receipt of such written notice, the City will abandon its efforts to construct the Public Improvements pursuant to Chapter 429 and the Developer shall be solely responsible for constructing and financing the elements of the Public Improvements as part of the Subdivision Improvements. The Developer shall be responsible for reimbursing the City for any costs it has incurred in pursuing the 429 process subsequent to termination of the Reimbursement Agreement which have not been reimbursed through the escrow amount deposited pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement and which were intended to be specially assessed under the Petition and Waiver 8 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 Agreement. If the Developer makes this option, the LOC for the Subdivision Improvements and the construction observation escrow required by section 18 b) of this Agreement shall be increased to reflect the resulting higher costs. 8. Septic Systems and Wells. a) The Developer or its successors or assigns agree to construct individual septic systems and wells to serve the lots within the Subdivision. All work in constructing the private utilities must comply with all City and state requirements regarding such private utilities. The septic systems and wells will remain private and will not be owned or maintained by the City. The septic systems proposed for use in the Subdivision by the Developer employ an innovative design. Due to higher maintenance requirements of such septic systems, the Developer shall provide that the HOA (as hereinafter defined) require all lot owners to abide by a common management plan for maintenance of the septic systems. b) All lots within the Subdivision must have primary and alternate septic sites on the lot which meet setback requirements and which do not interfere with the intended purpose of any drainage and utility or other easement. In no circumstance shall the treatment (absorption) area of the septic system be allowed within any easement. Other portions of the septic system may be permitted within an easement but only if the City determines, in the reasonable exercise of its discretion, that the septic system will not interfere with the intended purpose of the easement. Notwithstanding the above, up to 10 of the 41 lots may locate an alternate septic site within the Conservation Easement within a reasonable distance of the served lot if (i) the City determines in the reasonable exercise of its discretion that there is no reasonable alternate location on the lot; (ii) the Holder consents to the location of the alternate site; (iii) the location will not result in significant hardwood tree loss and; (iv) the alternate site is in compliance with all City and state regulations. c) All private wells shall be located on the served lot. Notwithstanding the above, the City may allow a private well to be placed within the Conservation Area but within a reasonable distance of the served lot if the City determines, in the reasonable exercise of its discretion, that there is no feasible location for the well on the lot. Any wells constructed within the City's drinking water supply area must be registered by the Developer or builder to monitor possible contamination. 9. Stormwater Improvements. a) The stormwater facilities will be constructed by the Developer in accordance with the Plans and in compliance with all City requirements regarding such improvements. The stormwater facilities include the ponds, pipes, structures and dry creek shown on the Plans. The stormwater facilities are located within the portion of the Property subject to the Conservation Easement. The Conservation Easement permits such facilities to be constructed and maintained within the Conservation Area. The City will also have drainage and utility easements over the stormwater facilities, which easements will partially overlap the Conservation Easement. b) The stormwater facilities serving the Subdivision will remain private and will be maintained by the Developer at its sole expense until taken over by the HOA. The City does not intend to accept the stormwater facilities as public and does not intend to maintain them. In order to meet the requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City code, the 9 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 Developer agrees to enter into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. The purpose of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement is to ensure that the Developer maintains the stormwater facilities until taken over by the HOA formed by Developer, and to give the City the right but not the obligation to do so if the Developer or the HOA fails in its obligations. The Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be recorded against the Property and will run with the land and be binding on Developer and its successors and assigns. The Developer acknowledges that (i) the stormwater facilities have not and will not be accepted by the City; (ii) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that the Developer and ultimately the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; (iii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the Developer or HOA to do so pursuant to the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement; and (iv) if, pursuant to the terms of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement, the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities after reasonable notice to the Developer or HOA and the failure of the Developer or HOA to perform the work, the City intends to seek reimbursement for the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision and other portions of the Property through special assessments or otherwise. c) The Developer intends to assign responsibility to the HOA for the maintenance, repair or replacement of the private stormwater facilities as needed and the HOA documents recorded with Hennepin County will so require. The HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair or replacement of all private stormwater facilities serving the Subdivision. The Developer agrees to inform purchasers of lots within the Subdivision that (i) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that the HOA will have primary responsibility for such work; (ii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the HOA to do so; and (iii) if the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities after reasonable notice to the Developer or HOA and the failure of the Developer or HOA to perform the work, the City intends to recover the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision. d) The Developer acknowledges that the City intends to establish a storm sewer improvement tax district (the "District") which includes all of the Property except Outlot A. The District will be established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 and will authorize the City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain, and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related improvements within or serving the Subdivision if such work becomes necessary in the opinion of the City based on the Developer's or the HOA's failure to perform pursuant to this Agreement and the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement. In recognition of this possibility, the Developer agrees to provide prospective lot purchasers with a disclosure statement informing them of the existence of the District and that a tax could be imposed on the lots within the Subdivision if the City is required to repair or maintain the storm sewer systems and related improvements. The wording of the disclosure statement must be approved by the City for use in connection with the sale of lots in the Subdivision prior to its distribution or use by the Developer. 10. Landscaping Plan. The Developer and its successors and assigns agree to install landscaping in accordance with the Plans and City code. All landscaping shall include hardy, 10 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 non-invasive and drought tolerant species appropriate for Minnesota. All landscaping materials shall be maintained and replaced if they die within two years after acceptance by the City. 11. Street Lighting and Signs. The Developer agrees to install street lighting and street signs within the Subdivision at its sole cost. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Developer shall submit lighting details to the City for review and approval by City staff. All lighting shall meet City standards. Street lighting shall include lighting fixtures approved by the City and shall be equipped with luminaries which allow no light more than five percent above the horizontal plane. If the Developer installs street lighting fixtures consistent with the City's standard fixtures, the City will maintain the fixtures thereafter. The Developer or HOA will be required to maintain all other types of fixtures. Street signs shall be of a design approved by the City and shall be dedicated by the Developer to the City after installation and acceptance by the City. Street signs requiring repair or replacement will be replaced by the City with the City's standard form of street sign. The Developer or the HOA will be required to pay for repair or replacement if any other type of street sign is desired. 12. Conservation Easement; Land Stewardship Plan. a) Deerhill Preserve consists of 170 acres and was previously used for agricultural and other purposes. It is the desire of the Developer and the basis under which the City has granted the City Approvals that the Subdivision be developed with single family detached dwellings on individual lots but that a substantial portion of the Property be preserved and returned to its pre -agricultural condition. An area containing approximately 89 acres of Deerhill Preserve (the "Conservation Area") is being set aside by the Developer and will be subject to a conservation easement (the "Conservation Easement") in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F. In order to achieve the desired restoration and enhancement objectives, the Developer agrees to convey the Conservation Easement to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ("MCWD") at or before the time of recording the plat of Deerhill Preserve. The MCWD is a qualified holder ("Holder") under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 84C. b) The Conservation Easement speaks for itself, and includes prohibition on the assignment of the role of Holder to an entity other than MCWD without the prior written approval of the City. The Conservation Easement provides for primary responsibility for enforcement of the terms and conditions of the Conservation Easement by the Holder but authorizes the City to enforce its terms and conditions upon refusal or failure of the Holder to do so. The City intends to recover any costs or expenses the Holder or it incurs in such enforcement efforts against the 41 lots in the Subdivision by any means available to it, including through special assessments against the lots. The HOA documents shall so inform lot owners. The Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges the benefit to the lots for such work and hereby consents to the City specially assessing the 41 lots within the Subdivision for the reasonable cost of enforcement work by the Holder or the City and waives the right to appeal under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 based on the City's authority to assess, but Developer reserves the right to appeal the amount of such assessment. c) The Developer will perform the restoration work in accordance with the Land Stewardship Plan (the "LSP") attached hereto as Exhibit H pursuant to a contract with an entity qualified to conduct such work. The City and the Developer acknowledge that the restoration 11 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 work may need to be revised as field conditions dictate and the parties agree to cooperate in adjusting the LSP accordingly. The Developer also agrees to provide a level of field inspection of the restoration work as set forth in the LSP. d) The Developer shall maintain the Conservation Area on an ongoing basis in accordance with the LSP. The Developer intends to assign its obligations regarding maintenance under the LSP to the HOA. Additionally, the Developer agrees to cause the HOA to employ an ecologist or other expert who is knowledgeable about site preservation and restoration in order to maintain the Conservation Area in accordance with the LSP. e) Upon successful establishment of the vegetation in each section of the Conservation Area, the Developer will ensure that the maintenance account has sufficient funds for three years of maintenance. Thereafter, the HOA shall establish fees or assessments against the lots in the Subdivision sufficient to sustain ongoing maintenance work. 13. Letter of Credit. a) In order to ensure completion of the Subdivision Improvements required under this Agreement and satisfaction of all fees due to the City, the Developer agrees to deliver to the City prior to beginning any construction or work within the Subdivision a letter of credit (the "Letter of Credit") in the amount of $996,956.34, which represents 150 percent of the estimated cost of the Subdivision Improvements as specified in the Plans. The Letter of Credit will not include any amount for the Boulevard Landscaping or the landscaping in the Deerhill Road right-of-way islands. This amount represents the maximum risk exposure for the City, based on the anticipated sequence of construction and the estimate of cost of each element of the Subdivision Improvements, rather than the aggregate cost of all required Subdivision Improvements. The Letter of Credit shall be delivered to the City prior to beginning any work on the Subdivision Improvements and shall renew automatically thereafter until released by the City. The estimated cost of the Subdivision Improvements covered by the Letter of Credit is itemized on Exhibit D attached hereto. The Letter of Credit shall be issued by a bank reasonably acceptable to the City and shall be in a form reasonably acceptable to the City. The Letter of Credit shall allow the City to draw upon the instrument, in whole or part, in order to complete construction of any or all of the Subdivision Improvements and to pay any reasonable fees or costs due to the City by the Developer after written notice to Developer and Developer's failure to cure the default within a reasonable period. b) As the Developer completes elements of the Subdivision Improvements, the City shall reduce the Letter of Credit to an amount roughly equal to 150 percent of the cost of the remaining work, subject to satisfaction of all of the Developer's financial obligations to the City. The Letter of Credit shall be released in full and returned to the Developer within 30 days of (i) completion of all of the Subdivision Improvements included in the calculation of the Letter of Credit; (ii) expiration of the two-year warranty period for the landscaping; and (iii) satisfaction of all financial obligations by the Developer to the City. Prior to releasing any portion of the Letter of Credit or accepting another letter of credit in replacement, the City shall first be satisfied that all work regarding the Subdivision Improvements has been completed according to the Plans. 12 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 c) The Letter of Credit shall include the amount shown on Exhibit D as the cost of all restoration work in the Conservation Area. The Letter of Credit will be calculated at 150 percent of the cost of the restoration work required under the LSP for Phase I and at 100 percent for the restoration work in other Phases. The portion of the Letter of Credit attributable to the restoration work in Phase I shall be released upon completion of said work and in accordance with this Agreement. The portion of the Letter of Credit for restoration work in future Phases shall be released only as such work is completed and adequate reserves for maintenance are established as required by this Agreement. d) It is the intention of the parties that the City at all times have available to it a Letter of Credit in an amount adequate to ensure completion of all elements of the Subdivision Improvements and satisfaction of the Developer's financial obligations to the City under this Agreement. To that end and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all requests by the Developer for a reduction or release of the Letter of Credit shall be evaluated by the City in light of that principle. e) If at any time credible sources within the banking industry publically report that the bank issuing the Letter of Credit is no longer solvent and the City determines that the bank therefore no longer satisfies the City's requirements regarding solvency, the City shall notify the Developer and the Developer shall provide to the City within 30 days a substitute Letter of Credit from another bank meeting the City's requirements. If within 30 days of notice, the Developer fails to provide the City with a substitute Letter of Credit from an issuing bank satisfactory to the City, the City may draw under the existing Letter of Credit. 14. Homeowners' Association. The Developer agrees to establish a homeowners' association (the "HOA"), encompassing all of the Property except for Outlot A. The Developer agrees to record covenants against said land for this purpose, which covenants must be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the City. The covenants shall be filed by the Developer with Hennepin County prior to any building permits being issued for the Subdivision. The HOA covenants must provide, among other things, for HOA maintenance of the stormwater facilities, the upland buffers, the Conservation Area and all common areas in the Subdivision. The HOA covenants shall also include provisions related to the required minimum balance of the Conservation Area maintenance account, reporting requirements and acknowledgment that the City has the right to specially assess the 41 lots within the Subdivision for costs of the Holder or the City in enforcing the Conservation Easement, which costs are deemed to be a benefit to the lots within the Subdivision. The City must approve the HOA covenants and will require that certain provisions thereof may not be amended or deleted without prior written City approval. 15. Upland Buffer Easement. The City requires that upland buffers be established around wetlands in order to protect the water quality of the wetlands. Portions of the area which would otherwise have been included in the Upland Buffer Easement is also within the Conservation Area and the City agrees to allow such areas to be restored and maintained in accordance with the Conservation Easement and LSP. However, some portions of the upland buffer extend into the lots within the Subdivision, including Lot 1, Block 1 in Phase I. The Developer agrees to execute the Upland Buffer Easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E, which easement will be recorded against the above lot. Portions of the upland buffer will 13 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 extend into other lots created in future Phases and the development agreements for such future Phases will require that the Developer execute similar easements with regard to other affected lots. The Developer agrees to make the HOA responsible for its maintenance obligations under the Upland buffer Easement Agreement and that the HOA documents recorded with Hennepin County will so require. 16. Official Controls. The Developer intends to phase development of Deerhill Preserve over several years as market conditions warrant. Preliminary approval was granted for the plat of Deerhill Preserve on October 6, 2015. This Agreement applies to all of the Property but has been negotiated specifically in connection with the first Phase of the Subdivision. Areas intended for later Phases are platted as outlots and the Developer intends hereafter periodically to submit other portions of Deerhill Preserve to the City for replat. The City will grant approval of replats for subsequent Phases of the development provided that each such Phase is consistent with the terms and conditions of preliminary plat approval of Deerhill Preserve, the CD-PUD General Plan, and the Plans. The City agrees not to enact any amendment to its comprehensive plan or official controls as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358, Subd. 3c, which would apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedication or platting required or permitted by the preliminary plat of Deerhill Preserve, the CD-PUD General Plan or the Plans, providing that the Developer is not in default under this Agreement and requests final approval of the final Phase of the Subdivision by no later than October 6, 2025. 17. Park Dedication Requirements. In order to satisfy the park dedication requirements for the Subdivision, the Developer agrees to deliver to the City a warranty deed for Outlot A and to convey easements for the trails shown on the Plans. In order to allow for the exact location of the trails to be determined in the field, the City will permit the Developer to convey the trail easements to the City as the trail locations are finalized. In addition to conveyance of Outlot A and easements for the trails, the Developer agrees to pay the City a cash in lieu park dedication fee of $ . This amount is calculated by subtracting the value of Outlot A from the Developer's total park dedication obligation of $ . The cash in lieu fee shall be payable at the rate of 1/41 of said fee at the time of issuance of each building permit for a lot within the Subdivision. 18. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection. a) The Developer agrees to pay to the City an administrative fee in the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its reasonable costs and expenses in reviewing the Subdivision, including the drafting and negotiation of this Agreement and preparation and execution of the process outlined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 to the extent such fees and costs are not reimbursed pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement. Such fees are estimated to be $40,000 in addition to fees paid to the City to date. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City in full for such reasonable costs within 45 days after notice in writing by the City. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost incurred in the enforcement of any provision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. b) The Developer shall also pay a reasonable fee for City construction observation and administration relating to construction of the Subdivision Improvements. In order to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost of inspection of the Subdivision Improvements, the 14 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 Developer shall deposit an additional $25,000 into an escrow account with the City, which shall receive and hold such funds solely under the terms of this Agreement. The City shall reimburse itself for expenses from the escrow and will provide the Developer with a copy of any invoice from the City engineer or evidence of other cost or expense attributed to the escrow prior to deducting such funds from the escrow. If any funds held under this escrow exceed the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its costs under this section, such funds shall be returned to the Developer without interest. If it appears that the actual costs incurred will exceed the estimate, the Developer and the City shall review the costs required to complete the project and the Developer shall deposit additional sums with the City. 19. Default. a) In the event of default by the Developer as to construction or repair of any of the Subdivision Improvements or any other work or undertaking required by this Agreement, and such default continues for 30 days after the City provides written notice to the Developer of the nature of the default pursuant to the notice requirements in this Agreement, or if such default cannot be cured within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to cure the default provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to cure said default, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any reasonable expense incurred by the City. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek an order from any court for permission to enter the Property for such purposes. If the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy special assessments against the land within the Subdivision to recover the costs thereof. For this purpose, the Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, expressly waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments, including but not limited to, hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the land so assessed. The Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, also waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 429.081. b) In the event of default by the City as to any obligation hereunder and after 30 days' notice by the Developer to the City, the Developer may, at its option, take any action, including legal or administrative action, in law or equity, which may appear necessary or desirable to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement or covenant of the City under this Agreement. 20. Insurance. The Developer agrees to take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six months after the City has accepted the Subdivision Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its contractors or subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission or for any other claim and $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The certificate of insurance shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance as is afforded to the Developer. 21. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy. a) Approvals granted to date by the City regarding the Subdivision do not include approval of a building permit for 15 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 any structure within the Subdivision. The Developer or its successors or assigns must submit and the City must approve building plans prior to approval of a building permit for a structure on any lot within the Subdivision. All building pads must be certified prior to initiation of construction of a home on a lot. The Developer or the party applying for a building permit shall be responsible for payment of the customary fees associated with the building permit and all other deferred fees as specified in this Agreement, including the allocated park dedication fee to such lot. b) No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any home constructed in the Subdivision unless prior thereto the lot has been graded and all landscaping installed in accordance with the Plans, the septic system, well and driveway have been installed, and an as built survey of the lot has been submitted and approved by the City. In cases in which seasonal weather conditions make compliance with these conditions impossible, the City may accept an escrow of sufficient amount to ensure completion of the work during the following construction season. 22. Clean up and Dust Control. The Developer shall use commercially reasonable efforts to regularly clean dirt and debris from streets adjoining the Subdivision resulting from construction work by the Developer, its contractors, agents or assigns, including any parry constructing houses within the Subdivision. Prior to any construction on the Property or adjacent areas, the Developer shall identify to the City in writing a responsible parry for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall provide dust control to the satisfaction of the City's engineer throughout construction within the Subdivision. 23. Compliance with Laws. The Developer agrees to comply with all laws, resolutions, ordinances, regulations and directives of the state of Minnesota and the City applicable to the Subdivision. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of Minnesota. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits for lots within the Subdivision. 24. Agreement Runs With the Land. This Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be recorded against the title thereto and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the City and the Developer and their successors and assigns. The Developer warrants that to Developer's knowledge as of the date hereof, there are no unrecorded encumbrances or interests relating to the Property. 25. Indemnification. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from approval of the Subdivision. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless for all reasonable costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees, except matters involving intentional acts or gross negligence by the City. 16 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 26. Assignment. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the prior written permission of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or denied. 27. Notices. Any notice or correspondence to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed to be given if delivered personally or sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested: a) as to Developer: Property Resources Development Corporation 6851 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite A Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Attention: Susan H. Seeland with a copy to: Anthony J. Gleekel Siegel Brill, P.A. 100 Washington Avenue South Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this section. The Developer shall promptly notify the City if there is any change in its name or address. 28. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such section and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other section or provision of this Agreement. 29. Non -waiver. Each right, power or remedy conferred upon the City or the Developer by this Agreement is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, or available to the City or the Developer at law or in equity, or under any other agreement. Each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City or the Developer and shall not be a waiver of the right 17 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. If either party waives in writing any default or nonperformance by the other parry, such waiver shall be deemed to apply only to such event and shall not waive any other prior or subsequent default. 30. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. 31. Estoppel Certificate; Partial Release. a) The City agrees at any time, and from time to time, within 10 business days after receipt of written request by the Developer, a lender or a party purchasing any portion of the Property (including a residential lot), to execute, acknowledge and deliver a certification in writing and in such form as will enable it to be recorded in the proper office for the recordation of deeds and other instruments certifying: (a) that this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect, or if there have been modifications, the identify of such modifications and that the same are in full force and effect as modified; (b) that no party is in default under any provisions of this Agreement or, if there has been a default, the nature of such default; (c) that all Subdivision Improvements to be constructed under this Agreement have been constructed, or, if not, specifying the Subdivision Improvements yet to be constructed; and (d) as to any other matter that the requesting party shall reasonably request. It is intended that any such statement may be relied upon by any person, prospective mortgagee of, or assignee of any mortgage, upon such interest. Any such statement on behalf of the City may be executed by the city administrator without city council approval. b) Following completion of the Subdivision Improvements and at the written request of the Developer, a lender or a party purchasing any portion of the Property (including a residential lot), the City agrees to execute a certification in writing releasing the lot from the Developer's obligations under this Agreement. Such certification shall not release the lot from any obligations to the HOA, for the special assessments levied by the City for the Public Improvements, the liability under the storm sewer improvement tax district or any other ongoing obligations regarding the Subdivision. ****************** 18 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. By: By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF MEDINA Bob Mitchell, Mayor Scott T. Johnson City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public 19 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 PROPERTY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) Susan H. Seeland, President This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2016, by Susan H. Seeland, the president of Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 (RHB) Notary Public 20 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT A TO CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property The land to which this Development Agreement applies is legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 4, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 through 4; Block 3; and Outlots B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M and N, all in Deerhill Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT B TO CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT List of Plan Documents The following documents prepared by Sathre-Bergqusit, Inc. constitute the Plans: Sheet 1: Title Sheet Sheets 2-10: Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Sheets 11-12: Infiltration Basins and Dry Swale Details Sheets 13-14: Erosion Control Plan Sheets 15-19: Storm Sewer Plan B-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT C TO CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of , 2016, by and among the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the City has obtained drainage and utility easements over portions of the Developer Property as shown on the plat of Deerhill Preserve (the "Easement Areas"); and WHEREAS, by a separate Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development Agreement (the "Development Agreement"), the Developer has agreed to construct and maintain certain stormwater facilities (the "Stormwater Improvements") for the benefit of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Stormwater Improvements which are the subject of this Agreement include stormwater ponds and related pipes, structures and dry creek bed. The Stormwater Improvements are depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requires permanent provisions for handling of runoff, including terms and conditions for operation and maintenance of all Stormwater Improvements, and requires such provisions to be set forth in an agreement to be recorded against the Property; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer intend to comply with certain conditions, including entering into a maintenance agreement regarding the Stormwater Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer, for itself and its successor or assigns, agrees to maintain the Stormwater Improvements and observe all drainage C-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 laws governing the operation and maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer shall make periodic inspection and perform maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements as described in Exhibit C attached hereto. The Developer shall make all such scheduled inspections and maintenance, keep record of all inspections and maintenance activities, and submit such records annually to the City. The cost of all inspections and maintenance, including skimming and cleaning of the Stormwater Improvements, shall be the obligation of the Developer and its successors or assigns as the fee owner of the Developer Property, which obligation shall be assigned to the HOA, as defined hereinafter, in accordance with section 7 of this Agreement. 2. City's Maintenance Rights. The City may maintain the Stormwater Improvements, as provided in this paragraph, if the City reasonably believes that the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to maintain the Stormwater Improvements in accordance with applicable drainage laws and other requirements and such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer written notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to complete said task. The City's notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. If Developer does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas and such portions of the Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Easement Areas to perform such maintenance tasks. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer or its successors or assigns, which shall include all reasonable staff time (at the applicable rates charged by the City to similarly situated parties), engineering and legal and other reasonable third party costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer or its successors or assigns fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses in maintaining the Stormwater Improvements within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Developer Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Stormwater Improvements benefits the Developer Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency, as determined by the city engineer, the 30-day notice requirement to the Developer for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety by the Developer, and the Developer shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given. 3. Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or resulting from the Developer's, or the Developer's agents' or employees' negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement by Developer or Developer's Agents or Employees, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions, except to the extent of intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. In the event the City, upon the failure of the C-2 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 Developer to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the performance of the Developer's required work under this Agreement, but this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. 4. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable costs prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees after providing written notice to Developer and a reasonable opportunity to cure. 5. Rights Not Exclusive. No right of the City under this Agreement shall be deemed to be exclusive and the City shall retain all rights and powers it may have under Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve the Stormwater Improvements. 6. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered or be sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: a) as to Developer: Property Resources Development Corporation 6851 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite A Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Attention: Susan H. Seeland b) as to City: with a copy to: with a copy to: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 ATTN: City Administrator Anthony J. Gleekel Siegel Brill, P.A. 100 Washington Avenue South Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. C-3 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 7. Successors and Assigns. All duties and obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Developer's successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Developer Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon creation of a homeowners' association for the Developer Property (the "HOA") by an instrument in a form satisfactory to the City which assumes and agrees to perform the obligations and responsibilities of the Developer under this Agreement, the HOA shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this Agreement as if it were the original signatory hereto and the Developer, its successors and assigns, shall be released from all personal liability under this Agreement but the Developer Property and the Fairways Property shall remain subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 8. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first written above. 9. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of Minnesota. ************************** C-4 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ) ss. PROPERTY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By: Susan H. Seeland, President This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2016, by Susan H. Seeland, the president of Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public C-5 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. CITY OF MEDINA By: By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Scott T. Johnson City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and the city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 Notary Public C-6 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 This Stormwater Maintenance Agreement is acknowledged and consented to by: MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016 by the of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, a under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the District. Notary Public C-7 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT A TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property The property to which this Stormwater Maintenance Agreement applies is legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 4, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 through 4; Block 3; and Outlots B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M and N, all in Deerhill Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota. C-A-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT B TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT NEEDS AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE POND LOCATIONS Depiction of Location of Stormwater Improvements [to be completed] C-B-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT C TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Inspection and Maintenance Schedule Stormwater Ponds: Inspection and maintenance shall be made consistent with the most recent version of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual or other subsequent manual as dictated by the City. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the schedule can be found in Table 12.POND.4 of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual as follows: Table 12.POND.4: Typical lnspestion7iHaintenance Frequencies for Ponds Inspection Items Maintenance Items Frequency Ensure that at least 50% of wetland plus survive Check for Invasive wetland plants. Replant wettarld vegetation One lime - Aflef First Year Check that maintenance access is free and clear. Inspect low flow orifices, reverse flaw pipes. and other pipes for clogging Check the pool or © permanent dry pond area for floating debns, undesirable vegetatton ImveSiigale the shoreline for erosion Monitor wetland plant composition and health. Look for broken signs, locks, and other dangerous items. Mowing - minimum Spring and Fall Remove debris Repair undercut eroded, and bare soil areas. Monthly to Quarterly or After Malor Storms Oil') Monitor wetland plant conposnron and health. Identity�vdSNe plants Ensure mechanical components are functional Trash and debns clearvup day Remove invasive plants Harvest wetland plants Replant wetland vegetation Repair broken mechanical components if needed Semi-annual to annual All routine Inspection kerns above Inspect user, barrel, and embankment for damage Inspect all pipes Monitor sediment deposilidn In pond and forebay Pipe and Riser Repair Forebay maintenance and sediment Every 1 10 3 ]ears removal when heeded Mdndor sediment deposteon In pond and torebay Forebay maintenance and Sediment removal when needed 3-7 Remote television inspection of reverse slope pipes, under -drains. and other hard to access piling Sediment removal from main pOnal wetland Plpe replacement it needed 5-25 years C-C-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 Stormwater Pond Sand Filters: Inspection and maintenance shall be made consistent with the most recent version of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual or other subsequent manual as dictated by the City. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the schedule can be found in Table 12.FIL.4 of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual as follows: Table 12F1L4. Recommended Maintenance Activities. for Media Filters (Sources: 1997: Pitt. 1997) WMI. Activity Schedule • If fitter bed is Goggled or partially clogged, marnlat malipuiairon of the surface layer of Sand may be required Remove the top few riches of media, rota -till or otherwise Cultivate the surface, and replace media with like material meeting the design specrficalrons • Replace any fitter fabnc that has become clogged As needed • Ensue that contntwtin j area, facility, Inlets and outlets am clear or debns. • Ensure that the contributing area is stabilized and mowed, with clippings removed. • Remove trash and debris. • Check to ensure mat the filler surface Is not clogging (aria) check after storms greater than about f •1. • Ensure that activibes in the drainage area minimize alrgrease and sediment entry to the system • If permanent water level is present in pre • .reatmant Clamber le.g . perimeter sand filter), ensure !nal finormal e chamber does not leak, and pool level Is Monthly • Fen see that the inter bed 6 clean of sediment and the sedummen i chamber Is not move than 6 Inches of sedYnent. Remove sediment as necessary • Make sure mat there is no evidence of deterioration, spatting or cracking of concrete Inspect grates Ipenmeter sand inter) • Inspect inlets. outlets and overflow spnMray to ensure good condition and no evidence of erosion • Repair or replace any damaged structural parts • Stabilize any eroded areas. • Ensure that flow is nor bypassing the facility • ElfSure that no raticeable odors ace detected out the facility Annualh • Remove and replace the lop 2-5 inches of media evey 3 to 5 years for low sedimentapplications. more CACTI, /Of areas of high sediment yield or high oil ana grease a la 5 years In addition to the above, ponds shall be inspected annually to determine if draw down occurs within 48 hours, and corrections made if the time exceeds 48 hours. C-C-2 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 Subdivision Improvement Co 934.] t SIVASS 012101E A O suv0 o1M1aAI,AIYluap1.0 idea ulapx„ pnuromPL.3 LOW lamps 6I N01 (t 1021- (ICOdunr3 0Z00W %EC S aues re. 6, l0 1.0131111 %S9) amuaA-1 PPS ...1u4,aooguoegually sl V 3rtuvri f31 v 99 sores 99r3 OS-SZS ar DEL i l 00'OaraLit 00'00ZELLs ~OM 00°XIS oo poets oslS oo 00B'r 00.00090LS OC 000.903 0003 WADES SO LOO'LLCS SO 30LIES 14/101 00 OO45ZS 00009'SZS 00 ZS 00009'Zi it po!PMsuop IaaaS wino !L CO OCS24 03'OES'Zt 0:It 0000C`Z `A`S s+wceg uo7anNul ui WIOS Lx41Poo0 pL CO 000.(I3 oo-oar'aS 00 Zf 00130001 NS ataLC0 AP NIL paaS. - taIw.S tiO bi g!o$ ua94Y,03 SL 00 OD! ZS 000923 00 O9S 009► 14317 Wald 49 44•104s M tap19'019 0991 AZ LIAM.9 ►l OD Ste' I LS COILS.' IS OD EDS 00 92 S3193Y WIAN Y MPS Ya rAlsail E L OD 09Z'SS 0000Z'SS OFFS Oo-009'. 'A'S la wa101o110:101raso13 Zl 00 00S'Zs 00 005CS 0S 0s 00 OCAS A 0 (a•PaaN u1 .u+pe LC oe,I. l L 00 VOSS LS 00 COSELS SA OS OD 00094 A 3 rocdvt pea,9p4a 01 00009'lZS 00 COO Lzs oe'LS DO ()DOS& 'A"0 (alert kr panseep(1'Itufv p./,d way. mwo0 s 00'000'Kt OD 000 ► S OD LS WOWS!. 'A'3 (pwose.yy'Auto/ Fo oixonns. P.alitA eionmuO ra os p 00ow/ins OOOoo't►14 Ol-rs at 0000t 'A-0 waonvo g uou LRID L Zt"s811 el own o0'ZS oo qrprZ 'Al 9ulueso pup moan a'waJ 115 9 94 ZL61S 84ZLB is S► LS tS'09E'I 'Jl &Ape' a iatpv - aDuad n1S S St letICS 51 L6Z'ICS St IS IN o9S`IZ Al u01141101100 lalaH' aPuaj LLS b 00 COWLS CO OOS'SS 00 OOS`SS COL Si 34i'P3040'01CM?+uG'tf! d'ISUIpi!ne Bm19cx3 wombat{ E 00065.LS 0003 LE OD 001`1S 00'4 'S1 Su1O7110 pue Buueap Z OOoors Is oo oats LI 00'OOZ'S LS 00 ! S 1 kapa,0 - 4.391090aW L 10111400 N01SOU3 Y 514101 1,0 9/l�N 30 i detol reculte Ittra gaud c:un k�o ipu�. .. ..>E.�....wk.��........®..a... o q :...,.....sue....--=--a....__3.....: r OLRULIrls3 Vaaupua Dios Pt ...Mr 4Iu41 Nul'16111110A10-a1.1ag AB pa.O.19 puellas u9mg bA pa.ctl'ak1 3A83S3Nd llIH2i33C1 ra 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 5 1 P a ,0 i 088g86116288268 9 ear, ,eerseereeo „ F189 !e:6q&1:11!q[ 5 it= a a_=g■ ,x A a3CS„8„,,,8.26 sgagn=iwifios@ ijiI82888888 SW! S p , 11111 i 1 ►1 • cA2221.8ea_.A,22122 5 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 D-2 D-3 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT E TO CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made this day of , 2016, by and among the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). RECITALS A. Grantor is the fee owner of property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and B. The Developer and the City have entered into a separate development agreement (the "Development Agreement") regarding the subdivision and development of the Property and other land owned by the Developer as Deerhill Preserve. C. The City has granted approval of a Planned Unit Development General Plan of Development and plat concerning Deerhill Preserve (the "City Approvals"), under the terms of which the Developer is required to establish upland buffers adjacent to wetlands on portions of the Property consistent with City regulations, the location of which is legally described on Exhibit B, attached hereto (the "Easement Area"). D. In accordance with the Development Agreement, the City Approvals and the City's wetland preservation ordinance, the City has requested that Developer grant to the City an easement (the "Upland Buffer Easement") over the Easement Area and Developer has agreed to maintain the Easement Area. The Easement Area is shown on the site plan depicted on Exhibit C attached hereto. E. Grantor is willing to grant the Upland Buffer Easement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. F. The Developer is willing to establish and maintain the Upland Buffer in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. PROVISIONS In consideration of the mutual promises of the parties contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City and to the Developer and their successors E-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 and assigns, an Upland Buffer Easement in, under, on, over and across the Easement Area, and the City and Developer hereby accept such grant. The duration of this easement is perpetual, subject to Minnesota law governing granting of easements to governmental bodies, and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. 2. The following terms and conditions shall apply to the Easement Area: a. The Easement Area shall be preserved predominantly in its natural condition, except to the extent set forth below. No use shall be made of the Easement Area except uses, if any, which would not change or alter the condition of the Easement Area or its drainage, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, or fish and wildlife habitat and characteristics. b. No structures, hardcover or other improvements shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, above or beneath the Easement Area, with the exception of a boardwalk or dock not to exceed four feet in width to allow reasonable access to the wetland. c. No trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Easement Area except as is necessary to remove storm damage, diseased or non- native vegetation or as authorized by the prior written consent of the City consistent with the wetland preservation ordinance A path no more than four feet in width may be mowed to allow reasonable access to the wetland. d. No earth, peat, gravel or soil, sand or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Easement Area and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. e. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area, and no waste, trash, yard waste, manure or other materials shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. 3. Grantor represents that Grantor owns the Easement Area in fee simple, subject only to the encumbrances of record. 4. The Grantor conveys to the City and to the Developer and their successors and assigns (collectively, the "Grantees"), the following rights: a. The Developer may enter upon the Easement Area for the purposes of preservation and maintenance of the Easement Area. The City may enter upon the Easement Area for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Easement Area without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of E-2 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 the Easement Area. The City shall provide notice to the Developer and an order for corrective action consistent with City regulations. If the Developer does not take the required corrective action within 30 days or such additional period as may be reasonably necessary following notice of the required corrective action, the City may enter the Property in order to perform the action. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of their reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses within 45 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Subdivision Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successor and assigns, acknowledges that the corrective work performed by the City benefits the Subdivision Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. b. The City may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction against the Developer to enforce the terms of this Agreement; to require restoration of the Easement Area to its prior or more natural condition; to enjoin such non- compliance by temporary or permanent injunction and to recover any damages arising from such non-compliance. If a court determines that the Developer has failed to comply with this Agreement, Developer or Developer's successors or assigns shall reimburse the City and Grantor for any reasonable costs of enforcement, including costs of restoration, court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees, in addition to any other payments ordered by the court. 5. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City and to the Developer a perpetual flowage easement and right and privilege to trespass with water over and upon any or all of the Easement Area. 6. Developer shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related to ownership, operation and maintenance of the Easement Area, except for costs resulting from the negligence or acts of the City. 7. Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and the Grantor, their officials, employees and agents, against any and all loss, costs, damage and expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs that the City or the Grantor incur because of the breach of any of the above covenants. The Grantor, the City and the Developer agree that each shall be responsible for its own acts and the results of such acts and shall not be responsible for the act of any other party and the results of such acts. 8. This Agreement may be amended only by mutual written agreement of the parties. 9. Nothing herein shall give the general public a right of access to the Property. 10. Grantor's and Developer's rights and obligations under this Agreement terminate upon E-3 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 transfer or termination of its interest in the Property, provided that any liability for acts or omissions occurring prior to the transfer or termination shall survive that transfer or termination. Nothing in this Paragraph 10 is deemed to alter or amend the remaining terms of the Agreement in the event of a transfer of interest. 11. Any notice required in this Agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested: a) as to Developer: Property Resources Development Corporation, Inc. 6851 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite A Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Attention: Susan H. Seeland with a copy to: b) as to City: With a copy to: Anthony J. Gleekel Siegel Brill, P.A. 100 Washington Avenue South Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attn: City Administrator Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either parry may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. ************************ E-4 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Upland Buffer Easement Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ) ss PROPERTY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By: Susan H. Seeland, President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Susan H. Seeland, the president of Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public E-5 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 CITY OF MEDINA By: By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Bob Mitchell, Mayor Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. This document drafted by: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Notary Public E-6 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT A TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description The Property is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Deerhill Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota E-A-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT B TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT The Upland Buffer Easement is over those portions of the Property legally described as follows: [to be completed] E-B-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT C TO UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT Site Plan of the Property Showing the Easement Area [to be completed] E-C-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT F TO CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT [include final form of easement approved by MCWD on May 26, 2016] F-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT G TO CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE This License Agreement for Maintenance (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 2016, by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the City approved a Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development Agreement (the "Development Agreement") and the plat of Deerhill Preserve, which includes one or more islands in the right-of-way of Deerhill Road; and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to landscape the islands and to maintain grasses and other landscaping within the right-of-way of Deerhill Road (the Boulevard Landscaping as defined in the Development Agreement); and WHEREAS, although the islands and Boulevard Landscaping are located within the public right-of-way and not on private land the City does not intend to maintain them; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to set forth the terms and conditions under which the City will permit private landscaping in the islands and along the public right-of-way by the Developer or its successors in interest; and WHEREAS, the land which is subject to this Agreement is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the license terms and conditions of this Agreement, in reliance upon the above recitals, and in reliance upon the representations, warranties and covenants of the parties herein contained, the City and the Developer agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 1.1 Terms. The following terms, unless elsewhere defined specifically in this Agreement, shall have the following meanings as set forth below. 1.2 City. "City" means the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation. G-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 1.3 City Engineer. "City Engineer" means the appointed city engineer of the City and his/her delegatees. 1.4 Developer. "Developer" means Property Resources Development Corporation, or its successors or assigns. 1.5 Plat. "Plat" means the plat of Deerhill Preserve on file and of record in Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.6 Improvements. "Improvements" means the landscaping in the islands and the Boulevard Landscaping to be installed by the Developer within the Public Right -of -Way. 1.7 Public Right -of -Way. "Public Right -of -Way" means the right-of-way for Deerhill Road for which has been dedicated to the public on the plat of Deerhill Preserve and by easement conveyed to the City by separate instrument over the portion of Deerhill Road located in the city of Orono. ARTICLE 2 MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS 2.1 Maintenance. The Developer agrees to maintain the Improvements at its own expense for the term of this Agreement. The Developer agrees to keep any grass, trees, bushes, herbage, or vegetation planted within the island or along the right-of-way neatly trimmed and pruned, properly watered, and fertilized. The Developer shall consistently manicure and clean litter and debris from the Improvements. The Developer shall also maintain the landscaping so as not to interfere with vehicular access and agrees to trim, prune and otherwise maintain the Improvements at the direction of the City. 2.2 Additional Improvements. The Developer may install new Improvements only upon the City Engineer's written authorization. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that it must also apply for and receive any applicable City permits for any activities that require a permit pursuant to City code. The term "new Improvements" is intended to apply to: (i) improvements not included in the Plans or the Public Improvements as defined and approved pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement; and (ii) major changes that may alter vehicular sight distance, or require City permits, or require disruption of roadway surfaces or vehicular traffic and is not intended to apply to the yearly planting of flowers or other herbage within the center islands or along the right-of-way. ARTICLE 3 CITY LICENSE GRANT 3.1 License Grant. The City hereby grants the Developer a license to maintain the Improvements pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. G-2 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 3.2 License. The terms of this Agreement shall only create a license for the Developer to maintain the Improvements within the public right-of-way. This Agreement does not create an interest in real property such as an easement or any other property right. 3.3 No Taking The termination of this Agreement by the City shall not constitute a taking as defined in Minnesota Statutes, § 117.025. The City and the Developer acknowledge and agree that the City must have the ability to use the full public -right-of-way dedicated by the Plat for any public purpose and that such use may eliminate part or all of the public right-of-way that is available for the Improvements. 3.4 City Maintenance if Required. The City reserves the right following reasonable written notice to the Developer to trim or eliminate any and all elements of the Improvements that, in the opinion of the City Engineer, threaten the safety of the public by obstructing vehicular sight distance, interfere with reasonable access to public improvements, interfere with vehicular passage, snowplowing or other maintenance or in any other manner interfere with the public's right to use and enjoy the public right-of-way for purposes for which it is intended. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for any reasonable expenses or costs incurred by the City in maintaining the Improvements. ARTICLE 4 DAMAGE TO IMPROVEMENTS; INDEMNIFICATION OF CITY 4.1 The Developer recognizes that the location of the Boulevard Landscaping, particularly the grasses immediately adjacent to the paved surface of Deerhill Road and trees and shrubs within the right-of-way, is likely to result in damage to the Boulevard Landscaping in the normal course of City snowplowing and other maintenance activities. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, hereby releases the City from any liability for destruction of or damage to any landscaping installed at the Developer's request and grasses within the right- of-way of Deerhill Road and shall be responsible for all repair or replacement itself. 4.2 Indemnification of City. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City, its council, agents, employees, attorneys and representatives harmless against and in respect of any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries, and deficiencies, including interest, penalties and reasonable attorneys' fees, that the City incurs or suffers, which arise out of, result from or relate to: a) the maintenance of Improvements or installation of new Improvements pursuant to this Agreement by the Developer, its contractors, its members or any parry acting under the authorization or direction of the Developer; and b) any other activity within the public right-of-way pursuant to this Agreement or under the assumed authority of the City by the Developer, its contractors, its members or any party acting under the authorization or direction of the Developer. G-3 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 The Developer shall not be responsible to indemnify, defend or hold harmless the City for any claim, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries and deficiencies, including interest, penalties and attorneys' fees, that are incurred due to the negligence or intentional misconduct of the City, its employees, officials, agents or contractors. 4.3 Governmental Immunity. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed a waiver by the City of any governmental immunity defenses, statutory or otherwise. Further, any and all claims brought by Developer, its successors or assigns, shall be subject to any governmental immunity defenses of the City under common law and the maximum liability limits provided in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. 4.4 Hazardous Substances. The Developer agrees that no hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants shall be used for any maintenance of the Improvements within the public right-of-way. The City shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorneys' fees, or losses resulting from any claims, actions, suits, or proceedings based upon a release of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants, caused by the Developer. ARTICLE 5 TERMINATION 5.1 City Termination for Licensee Failure to Maintain. If the Developer fails to maintain the Improvements within the public right-of-way within a reasonable standard of care, the City may serve notice of the maintenance deficiency. If the Developer fails to cure the maintenance deficiency within 60 days of the notice of maintenance deficiency, the City may serve a notice of license termination. If the Developer fails to request in writing a City council hearing pursuant to the notice requirements within 60 days of the notice of license termination, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated. If the Developer requests a City council hearing, the termination shall be effective following reasonable notice, a City council hearing, and the passage of a City council resolution terminating this Agreement. 5.2 Termination for Public Purpose. This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon passage of a City council resolution (following a public hearing) finding that the public right-of-way is needed for any alternative public purpose which may require either a temporary, partial, permanent or total elimination of the Improvements within the public right-of-way. The termination of this Agreement shall be effective 60 days after the City's mailing of said resolution to the Developer pursuant to the notice requirements of this Agreement. ARTICLE 6 MISCELLANEOUS 6.1 City's Duties. The terms of this Agreement shall not be considered an affirmative duty upon the City to maintain the Improvements within the public right-of-way. G-4 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 6.2 No Third Parry Recourse. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Developer under this Agreement. The covenants and conditions of this Agreement are intended for the benefit of the parties hereto and are not intended to create any third parry beneficiaries. 6.3 Validity. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. 6.4 No Assignment. The parties mutually recognize and agree that this Agreement shall not be assigned by the Developer unless said assignment is agreed to by the City in writing. Notwithstanding the above, the City hereby consents to the assignment of this Agreement by the Developer to the homeowners' association ("HOA") for Deerhill Preserve or similar entity so long as the HOA assumes all obligations and liabilities of the Developer under this Agreement. 6.5 Amendment. The parties hereto may by mutual written agreement amend this Agreement in any respect. Any agreement on the part of any party for any such amendment must be in writing. 6.6 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Minnesota. 6.7 Notice. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be sufficiently given by one party to the other if in writing and if and when delivered or tendered either in person or by depositing it in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, addressed as follows: a) as to Developer: Property Resources Development Corporation6851 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite A Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Attention: Susan H. Seeland with a copy to: b) as to City: Anthony J. Gleekel Siegel Brill, P.A. 100 Washington Avenue South Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 ATTN: City Administrator 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 G-5 with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty Kennedy & Graven 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or to such other address as the party addressed shall have previously designated by notice given in accordance with this section. Notices shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or on the third day after mailing if mailed as provided above. 6.8 Successors and Assigns. All duties and obligations of the Developer under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of the Developer's successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon execution and recording by the HOA for the Property of an instrument in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the City assuming and agreeing to perform the obligations and responsibilities of the Developer under this Agreement, the HOA shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this Agreement as if it were the original signatory hereto and the Developer, its successors and assigns, shall be released from all liability under this Agreement, but the Property shall remain subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 6.9 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 6.10 Headings. The subject headings of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Agreement are included for purposes of convenience only, and shall not affect the construction of interpretation of any of its provisions. 6.11 No Additional Waiver Implied By One Waiver. In the event any agreement contained in this Agreement is breached by the Developer and thereafter waived in writing by the City, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. All waivers by the City must be in writing. 6.12 Insurance. The Developer represents that the Developer has general liability insurance and hereby agrees to provide the City with a copy of a certificate of insurance evidencing its general liability insurance policy prior to any maintenance of the Improvements or installation of new Improvements pursuant to this Agreement. The Developer agrees to keep its general liability policy in place and active at all times during the term of this Agreement and the Developer agrees to give the City written notice of any policy cancellation or material changes in the general liability policy limits G-6 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this License Agreement for Maintenance. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ) ss PROPERTY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By: Susan H. Seeland, President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Susan H. Seeland, the president of Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public G-7 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 CITY OF MEDINA By: By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Bob Mitchell, Mayor Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 Notary Public G-8 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT A TO LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE The land to which this License Agreement for Maintenance applies is legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 4, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 through 4; Block 3; and Outlots B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M and N, all in Deerhill Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota. G-A-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT H TO CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Land Stewardship Plan [include final form of LSP approved by MWCD on May 26, 2016] H-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT I TO CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is made by Stonegate Farm, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Grantor, in favor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Grantee. Recitals A. Grantor is the fee owner of the property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"). B. Grantor desires to grant to the Grantee an easement according to the terms and conditions contained herein. Terms of Easement 1. Grant of Easement. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor, Grantor grants and conveys to the Grantee a permanent, non-exclusive easement for right-of-way purposes over, under, across and through the land legally described in Exhibit B and depicted on Exhibit C, both attached hereto (the "Easement Area"). 2. Scope of Easement. The permanent non-exclusive right-of-way easement granted herein includes the right of the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and employees to enter the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of grading, locating, constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, inspecting, altering and repairing within the Easement Area for use by the public a public roadway, sidewalk, and other public facilities or improvements of any type that are not inconsistent with a public right-of-way. The easement granted herein also includes the right of the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to cut, trim, or remove from the easement area trees, shrubs, or other vegetation as in the Grantee's judgment unreasonably interfere with the Easement Area or improvements of the Grantee located therein. 3. Warranty of Title. The Grantor warrants it is the fee owner of the Property and has the right, title and capacity to convey to the Grantee the easement herein. 4. Environmental Matters. The Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees, or losses resulting from any claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon a release or threat of release of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which may have existed on, or which relate to, the Easement Area prior to the date of this instrument. I-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 5. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns. STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: NONE Dated this day of , 2016. STONEGATE FARM, INC. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ) ss. By: , Vice President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by , the Vice President of Stonegate Farm, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation, Grantor. NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered (RHB) 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 Notary Public I-2 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT A TO RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT Legal Description The Property referenced in the preceding right-of-way easement is legally described as follows: That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23 lying North of the center line of County Road No. 6 as monumented and platted in the plat of Hennepin County State Aid Highway Number Six, Plat Five, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I-A-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT B TO RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT Legal Description The portion of the Property subject to the right-of-way easement is legally described as follows: [to be completed] I-B-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT C TO RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT The portion of the Property subject to the right-of-way easement is depicted below: [to be completed] 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 I-C-1 EXHIBIT J TO CONSERVATION DESIGN -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of , 2016 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), Stonegate Farm, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Owner") and Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner is the fee owner of certain real property located in Medina and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto, (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the City has approved a Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development Agreement (the "Development Agreement") with the Developer, and the plat of Deerhill Preserve (collectively, the "City Approvals") to allow the development of the Property for residential purposes; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement, the City and the Developer have agreed that the City will construct certain public improvements which will benefit the Property (the "Public Improvements"); and WHEREAS, the City is willing to construct the Public Improvements without notices or hearings, provided the assurances and covenants hereinafter stated are made by the Owner and the Developer to ensure that the City will have a valid and collectable special assessment as it relates to the Property to finance the cost of the Public Improvements; and WHEREAS, were it not for the assurances and covenants hereinafter provided, the City would not construct the Public Improvements without such notices and hearings and is doing so solely at the behest, and for the benefit, of the Developer; and WHEREAS, the parties have entered into this Agreement pursuant to and in satisfaction of the terms of the Development Agreement and the City Approvals previously granted by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, ON THE BASIS OF THE COVENANTS AND OBLIGATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 J-1 1. The Owner represents and warrants it is the fee owner of the Property, that it has full legal power and authority to encumber the Property as herein provided, that in doing so it is not in violation of the terms or conditions of any instrument or agreement of any nature to which it is bound or which relates in any manner to the Property and that there are no other liens or encumbrances against the Property except those of record as of this date. 2. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Development Agreement, the Owner (and currently the Developer), which owns all land abutting the Public Improvements contemplated herein, hereby petitions the City for construction of the Public Improvements, as more fully described in the Development Agreement. The Owner intends on conveying the Property to the Developer in phases over time, including the ten (10) residential lots created out of Phase I of the Subdivision (as those terms are defined in the Development Agreement). 3. The Owner and the Developer consent to the City levying a special assessment for the Public Improvements against the Property in accordance with Minn. Stat., Section 429.061 and the terms and conditions of Section 7 of the Development Agreement. The principal amount of the special assessment shall not exceed the lesser of the actual cost, including all of the City's costs incurred in constructing the Public Improvements, including legal, engineering, and other consulting fees and the cost of bond issuance and ongoing bond administrative fees or $1,085,720. This figure is based on the cost estimates shown on Exhibit B attached hereto. Such maximum amount to be assessed shall be adjusted to include the amount of any change order approved by the Medina city council following award of the contract for the Public Improvements. The City shall deliver written notice to the Developer prior to accepting any change order. 4. The Owner and Developer waive notice of hearing and hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 429.031, on the Public Improvements and notice of hearing and hearing on the special assessment levied to finance the Public Improvements pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 429.061 and specifically request that the Public Improvements be constructed and the special assessment be levied against the Property without notice of hearing or hearing. 5. The Owner and the Developer waive the right to appeal the levy of special assessment in accordance with this Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 429.081 and further specifically agree with respect to such special assessment against the Property that: a. All requirements of Minn. Stat., Chapter 429 with which the City does not comply are hereby waived by the Developer; and b. The increase in fair market value of the Property resulting from construction of the Improvement Project will be at least equal to the amount of the special assessment levied against the Property, and that such increase in fair market value is a special benefit to the Property. 6. The special assessment will be levied against the Property consistent with Section 7 of the Development Agreement. The special assessment for each lot will be due and 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 J-2 payable at the time of the Developer's sale of a lot to a builder or end user or upon and as a condition of the issuance of a building permit for any such lot, whichever is earlier. Any special assessment amounts remaining unpaid on November 1, 2028, will be payable in equal installments over the following three years. All payments shall bear interest at a rate equal to no more than two percent above the City's cost of financing (based on the sale of municipal bonds with a 15-year term), rounded up to the nearest one -quarter percent. All special assessments, including deferred assessments, will accrue interest in accordance with the City's policy on special assessments, which specifies compound interest from the date of adoption of the assessment roll. Such interest shall also be calculated during the period of deferral, and the Developer may pay the interest costs to the City, or such interest costs may be capitalized into the payments due. The City's cost of financing shall mean the average coupon rate if the City sells debt to finance the Public Improvements. If no debt is sold for the Public Improvements, the rate shall be set using the same formula based on special assessment bonds of Minnesota municipalities which have the same credit rating as that of the City and are issued and sold at approximately the same time as the adoption of the resolution levying the special assessment. The first installment of principal and interest shall be included in the first tax rolls completed after adoption of the resolution levying the special assessment, except insofar as those portions that are deferred under the terms herein. The foregoing notwithstanding, the special assessments may be prepaid at any time. 7. The Owner and the Developer agree to take no action which would cause the Property to be eligible for deferral of the special assessments beyond the 12 year deferral specified herein. Any such action by or on behalf of the Developer shall be an Event of Default under this Agreement and shall cause the special assessments to be due and payable immediately. 8. The covenants, waivers and agreements contained in this Agreement shall bind the Owner and the Developer and their successors and assigns and shall run with the Property. It is the intent of the parties hereto that this Agreement be in a form which is recordable among the land records of Hennepin County, Minnesota and the Owner, the Developer and the City agree to make any changes in this Agreement which may be necessary to effect the recording and filing of this Agreement against the title of the Property. 9. At the request of the Owner and the Developer, the City agrees to reapportion the special assessment initially levied against the outlots in Deerhill Preserve as additional lots are created in future Phases in such manner as the Owner and the Developer request, subject to the City's reasonable determination that the reapportionment will not adversely affect the City's ability to collect the full amount of the special assessment. 10. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed given if delivered personally or sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified and return receipt requested: 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 J-3 a) as to Developer and Owner: Property Resources Development Corporation 6851 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite A Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Attention: Susan H. Seeland with a copy to: Anthony J. Gleekel Siegel Brill, P.A. 100 Washington Avenue South Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 ATTN: City Administrator c) with a copy to: Ronald H. Batty, City Attorney Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as any party may from time to time notify the others in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 11. This Agreement shall terminate upon the final payment of all special assessment levied against the Property for the Public Improvements. The City agrees to execute and deliver such documents, in recordable form, as are necessary to extinguish its rights hereunder upon receipt of such final payment. ************************* 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 J-4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Petition and Waiver. By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) PROPERTY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Susan H. Seeland, President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Susan H. Seeland, the President of Property Resources Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation, Developer. Notary Public 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 J-5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Petition and Waiver. STONEGATE FARM, INC. By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by , the of Stonegate Farm, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation, Owner. Notary Public 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 J-6 CITY OF MEDINA By: Bob Mitchell., Mayor By: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Bob Mitchell and Scott T. Johnson, the mayor and city administrator, respectively, of the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, on behalf of the City. THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered (RHB) 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Notary Public 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 J-7 EXHIBIT A TO PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT Legal Description The land to which this Petition and Waiver Agreement applies is legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 4, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 through 4; Block 3; and Outlots B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M and N, all in Deerhill Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota. J-A-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 EXHIBIT B TO PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT Estimated Improvement Project Costs Construction cost, including contingency and overhead $ 957,625 Costs of bond issuance, including fees for fiscal agent, rating agency, bond trust services, county auditor's certificate, underwriter premium, bond counsel and annual arbitrage and fiscal agent fees Legal fees Engineering fees $ 63,095 $ 40,000 $ 25,000 $1,085,720 J-B-1 476494v10 RHB ME230-630 WSB && Associates, engineering • planning • environmental • construction 707 Xenia 19venue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-5q 1-51800 Fax: 763-541-1700 Memorandum To: Tom Kellogg, P.E., City Engineer City of Medina From: Earth Evans, P.E. Water Resources Project Manager WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: 5.24.16 Re: Deerhill Preserve Stormwater Management Plan Review City Project No. LR-15-162 WSB Project No. 2712-81 We have completed a review of the Deerhill Preserve, formerly Stonegate Farms development in Medina, MN. The site was previously reviewed on 2.16.16. Documents provided for review by Sathre-Berquist include the following: • Grading and Utility Plans dated 5.2.16 • Culvert Design calculation dated 5.2.16 These plans were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's Stormwater Design Manual and general engineering practices for stormwater management. 1. Please provide updated Hydrocad modeling 2. The City's Design Guide requires infiltration unless soils or other constraints prohibit it, then filtration can be used. The Soil Survey information provided indicates HSG B soils, which are conducive to infiltration. The comment response letter indicates that infiltration will be provided if it is feasible and that soil borings have been schedule. Please provide the results of the soil borings and amend the infiltration basins as needed based on those results. Final approval of the infiltration basins cannot be provided until the results of the soil borings are provided due to the changes required to the design if infiltration is feasible. Additionally, the abstraction volume will need to be updated based on the results of the soil borings. St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng • com CAUsers\dustyfinke\AppData\Local \Microsoft\Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook\AZR606ZD\Deerhill Preserve_050416.doc Stonegate Farms 5.4.16 Page 2 3. Please verify the discharge in the Culvert Design calculation matches the peak 100-year discharge to the culverts. The calculation indicates that the full pipe capacity is significantly higher than the projected design flow. Flowing full, the velocity in the culverts will be greater than 6 fps. 4. The plans indicate the piped outlets from several of the proposed grassed channels will be constructed in the future. Please clarify the sequencing. The piped outlets, or at minimum a defined and stabilized temporary overflow route, should be provided for the proposed channels concurrent with construction of the channel grading. This is in particular a concern for the outlet from Channel F because the overflow route is offsite if the piped outlet isn't constructed. 5. FES B 1 to B2 is routed from west to east. Confirm that an adequate flow path is provided downstream of B2 and that there is a drainage/utility easement to cover the flow path. 6. A piped outlet is recommended from Channel B into Pond 4 to reduce erosion at the overflow path from the channel. Q\Users\dustyfinke\AppData\ Local\ MicrosoltWindows\Temporary Internet Files\ Content.Outlook AZR606ZD\Deerhill Preserve_050416.doc VICINITY MAP PUD Zoning: Fysb - 50 ft Sysb - 20 ft Rysb - 10 ft 60' Row - 24' Pavement 50' Row - 22' Pavement(Culde-sacs) s! 7 W O CONSTRUCTION PHASING 1. ALL OF GRADING TO BE COMPLETED IN 2016. 2. ALL PONDS AND DITCHES TO BE COMPLETED IN 2016. 3. ROADWAY THAT IS HATCHED TO BE COMPLETED IN 2016 4. TRAIL THAT IS HATCHED IS TO BE COMPLETED IN 2016 5. WEAR COARSE TO DETERMINED BY BUILDING PERMITS 6. STORM SEWER HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW TO BE INSTALLED IN THE FUTURE. ALL OTHER STORM SEWER TO BE INSTALLED IN 2016. 7. TURN LANE TO BE INSTALLED IN 2016 8. CULDESACS TO BE GRADED IN 2016. CULDESAC STREET CONSTRUCTION TO BE DETERMINED. z 200 100 0 100 200 400 %! SCALE IN FEET 1 / J� — 1 I I- 11 —� I t- ---4 1 I / L----[(-' C I ` I —1——1 �---k—< ni H I I I I I I I y—J --LL�1' SHEET INDEX TABLE < > SHEET Description 1 Title Sheet 2-8 Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan 9-10 Infiltration Basins and Dry Swale Details 11-12 Erosion Control Plan 12-21 Street Plan and Turn Lane Plans 22-26 Storm Sewer Plan -e- — xco, —7— I I I I 1 I I 1 I PREPARED BY PREPARED FOR < ENGINEER X DEVELOPER SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. PROPERTY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 PHONE: (952) 476-6000 FAX: (952) 476-0104 CONTACT : DANIEL L. SCHMIDT, P.E. EMAIL: SCHMIDT@SATHRE.COM 6851 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PHONE: (612) 991-1823 DRAWING NAME NO. == DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MMMO M3INKEEMItTilLM DLS DLS DLS 02-12-201: 03-11-201: 05-02-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS CITY REVISIONS CITY REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPY NG, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 N SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA TITLE PAGE DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 DEERHILL PRESERVE 7282-010-200 C z 4 25^' 4" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW 6" CROWN (0.02% MIN) 4•SELECT TOPSOIL BORRO 2' MIN. I 4' DITCH BOTTOM 1 Mr-SPWEB2400 WEAR COURSE 25SPNWB230B BASE ME% 10'-LASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, RN%CRUSHED UMEROCK OR RECYCLED AGG.(MNOOT 3138.) %%RADE STABILIZATION FABRIC -002,ES NON -WOVEN COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE AS CONDITIONS REQUIRE IOW VOW% BTRIMINOUS STREET ti 4' PERFORATED DRAINRIE DRAWEE Rd FILTER SOCK BEDDED IN PEE ROCK 11/r- B20302400 WEAR COUPBE 10"-CLASS BASE COURSE IO"-CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 10016CAUA® LMEROCR OR RECYCIFD AGG. (MNDOT SIM.) SUB,G4. E STABILISATION FABRIC -O=SR NONWOVEN COMPACTEDAGGREGATEBA4 AS OONDITONREQMRE NOTE: IOW VOLUME BITUMINOUS STREET WITH CONIPEIE Q1RBM10 GIR1E0. 1. PILORGANIC OROTIERUNSURABLEMATERTAL 9l4LL BE REMOVED FROMBENEAGTHE ROADWAY INSTALLED AS SHALL BE TO AllID BEHIND CURB ALL LOW POBiTS, 5P PI EACH DIRECRON.DPAIMILETO BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY DRAIN ALL LOW AREAS. DEER HILL ROAD LOW VOLUME RURAL AND URBAN STREET TYPICAL SECTION LAST 0.041SION: TAN. 2011 STR 05 FILL ROW 30. 30 CUT ROW ROW, FILL 15' 15' 12' 12' 3% PROPOSED STREET SECTION A DEERHILL ROAD 1.0' 30 CUT 30 ROW 15' 15' 12' 3% 3% 3 3.Y 8' 2 14' BOTTOM PROPOSED STREET SECTION B FILL ROW 30 CUT 30 ROAD SECTION MODIFICATIONS FOR DRY SWALE BMP ROW 1.0' 1 I3.Y 5;1 15' 12' 12' 3% 3% PROPOSED STREET SECTION C DEERHILL ROAD o,max.55 STA53,50ra,q, 50,50 1.2' 5'I 5;1 6' 14' BOTTOM NORTH SIDE ROW 30 SOUTH SIDE 30 ROW 3% 15' 12' 12' 3% 3:5 PROPOSED STREET SECTION D L 2' 6' I I 4' BOTTOM ROW 30 CUT 30 ROW 15' 12' VARIES 12' 3% PROPOSED STREET SECTION E STA5r00t1I ,y, Fro 4' BOTTOM ROW SOUTH SIDE NORTH SIDE 25 25 ROW ROW 3% 14' 14' 11' % 3% PROPOSED STREET SECTION F SOUTH CUL DE SAC STAG RIDGE 6' II 4BOTTOM EAST SIDE 25 3% 14' 14' 11' 3% PROPOSED STREET SECTIO NORTH CUL DE SAC FOX HILL ROAD SEPTIC SITE LEGEND PROPOSED SEPTIC LOCATION PERC BORING COIL BORING CONTOUR LEGEND - - 2' CONTOUR EXISTING - - 10' CONTOUR EXISTING 2' CONTOUR PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR EXISTING 2' CONTOUR PROPOSED CUSTOM GRADED 10' CONTOUR PROPOSED CUSTOM GRADED EROSION CONTROL LEGEND ROCK ENTRANCE BERM SILT FENCE SILT FENCE (POST CONSTRUCTION) BIO-ROLL CONCRETE WASHOUT INLET PROTECTION CAT.3 STRAW BLANKET ON -SITE BMPS - (Far more detailed information Section 2.2 of the SWPPP) 1. REDUCE IMPERVIOUS AREA - REDUCTION IN STREET WIDTH FROM 24' TO 22'. 2. RIP RAP - RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT ALL APRONS FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AND PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROL- (Utility Contractor) 3. INLET PROTECTION - INLET PROTECTION WILL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ALL CATCH BASINS 8 REAR YARD STRUCTURES. (WIMCO'S OR EQUAL) -(Utility Contractor) 4. SLOPE STABILIZATION - SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG DOWN GRADIENT GRADING LIMITS AND WOODFIBER BLANKET WILL BE UTILIZED ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SLOPE STABILIZATION. (Grading Contractor) 5. BIOROLLS - BIOROLLS WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG REAR YARD SWALES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM REACHING THE NURP POND AND ULTIMATELY DOWNSTREAM WETLANDS(Grading Contractor). 6. STREET SWEEPING - STREET SWEEPING WILL BE DONE A MINIMUM OF ONCE PER WEEK OR AS NEEDED TO MINIMIZE DUST CONTROL AND VEHICLE TRACKING.(Grading and Utility Contractor) 10. PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERTILIZER- PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERTILIZER WILL ALSO BE USED ON SITE.- 11. ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT WASTE PRODUCED SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. (Utility Contractor) 12. DRY SWALE 12.1. FLATTER DITCH SLOPES TO REDUCE EROSION AND INCREASE TREATMENT 12.2. SOIL MODICATIONS AS PER PAGE 12 300 150 0 150 300 600 Z SCALE IN FEET CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT OR DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. INSPECT POND, SILT FENCE, AND ROCK ENTRANCE BERM AFTER ALL RAINFALL EVENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 3. L08 WO PADS 3.1 MAX. 4. RESTORATION -28 ACRES PLUS WETLAND RESTORATION AREAS. DRY SWALES AND INFILTRATION AREAS SEEDING BY OTHERS 4.1. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS EXCEPT DRY SWALES AND INFILTRATION AREAS WITH 4" TO 6" OF TOPSOIL, OR EXISTING ON -SITE ORGANIC MTRL. 42. SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH MNDOT MIXTURE N250 AT A RATE OF 100 LBS./ACRE AND FERTILIZE WITH 2OA10 AT 100 LBS./ACRE. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) WETLAND RESTORATION - BWSR SEED MIX FOR WETLANDS (AS NOTED IN THE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN APPLICATION) 4.3. ONLY PHOSPHOROUS FREE FERTILIZER IS TO BE USED ON SITE. 4.4. MULCH WITH TYPE 1 AT A RATE OF 2 TONS/ACRE AND DISC ANCHOR IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT. USE WOODFIBER BLANKET ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 (FT) OR GREATER. 4.5. PLACE APPROVED STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION IN OR AROUND ALL STORM SEWER INLETS AND MAINTAIN UNTIL STREET CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. 4.6. MAINTAIN ALL SILT FENCE UNTIL TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 4.7. RESTORATION WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF GRADING COMPLETION. 5. SILT FENCE, BEFORE GRADING -22,OODLF 6. SILT FENCE AFTER GRADING- 1,500 LF 7. ALL INDIVIDUAL LOTS WILL BE CUSTOM GRADED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS MASS GRADED LOTS. HOUSES AND DRIVEWAYS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY; THE PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN ARE 1 POSSIBLE GRADING OPTION. AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT, CUSTOM GRADING 8 DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS WILL BE PREPARED. 8. WHERE DITCHES ARE PRESENT AT DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS, CULVERTS MAY BE REQUIRED. 9. CULVERTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL DRIVEWAYS. SIZING AND LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED WHEN THE INDIVIDUAL SITE SURVEYS ARE PREPARED. A MINIMUM 12" CULVERT SHALL BE REQUIRED. DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS Base SGF DRAWN BY DSG CHECKED BY DLS DATE 05/01/15 1 2 3 4 5 6 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS DLS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S DLS 03-31-2016 ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING DLS O4-19-2016 ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 N SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 2 26 DEERHILL PRESERVE 7282-010-200 61CTRATON- --' BASIN #4 BOT 992.0 HWL 994.0 (FUTURE TEMP BASIN) - � SED BASIN 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 TRAIL EASEMENT TO BE ORbFTED WHEN OUTLOTD IS Y2EPLATTED / / / TRAIL EASEMENT E DRAFTED AFTER :ONSTRUCTION 1D0 ¢\ 1 29.7 A 3.081 // 00 .58) 1,1, — . — — _ / I 633 M HPir \ • 1 NORTH • ♦♦ • 29.7 Ac. I / I ILTRATON I /BASIN #1 I BOT 992.0 I I HWL995.3 I I I I I I I I FOREBAY I I I I I I BOND 1 N1WL 993.0 HWL 995.3 • • r / r/ L 1 WETLAND 1 (Preserve) i HWL - 989.2 (MCWD STUDY) • • • ENKA MAT REINFORCED • EOF - SEE DETAIL N •• y N ` 990 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET F'� 1 I 100 YEAR" FLOODPLAIN -I ELEVATION 989,2 AS PER MCWD STUDY I-_ OUTLOT B ("8_ WETLAND 1 (DNR Preserve) 29.7 Ac. DRAWING NAME NO BY DATE REVISIONS Base SGF DRAWN BY DSG CHECKED BY DLS DATE 05/01/15 2 3 4 5 6 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS DLS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S DLS 03-31-2016 ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING DLS O4-19-2016 ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 5 �2 P �P N SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 26 DEERHILL PRESERVE 7282-010-200 / TQ' BE DRAFTED I / CONSTRUCTION 1 / / / / / / / FI�L'�J FIT TURF /-BETWEE�N/EXISTIyJCt, // (FUTURE) / % / / C'f /� / --' -- i /// / / ///� \��i / ��1 / / / /� i ,/ / // �SS CHANNEL- ///// P-LANDSCAPE �� // E9 DINGPL�NIWY // // �`�'•'�,� _------ i iSUPEfi ELEVATE -�=,,,_-_-- ,� ' -� TO DRAIN TO ----t,z / - _- — = — �}2�— / --� --l' ' e28-_--'- — — \ T //�—_— \ / \ ^ / y� vv / // \ \\ .3�, \ \ / �,C;,\ - `/// FIELD EN TRGT BETWEEN EXISTING (FUTURE) 20' TRAIL TO BE -DRAFTEE; /� - - /60N$TRUOIIION v1 __MELD1rTwRAIy / / BETWEEN EXISTINy / (FUTURE) / v �- / v / _ / -__i_., \ /� T / / // / AV _// / / \- __- •�� 1 / // -- / / // -- 1 v `-/ / /'� 1 / / \\ I1 A A \ V 1 V \ I ' V v 1 Ip - / o v -- \\ 11 1 N R�'K--- N \ �k 4)- 'go \- T \ --i0P0- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V so zs o 2s AFTER / / / / / / /// // TRAIL/ / TREES] _ / / // / �� AND_ - _— CUL4ESAC THE WEST - - �� —__ /�\ STRAW B /KET 2.6/ / / / / /_- / / / _ - % / / / - / / ; 1 / / / I I / 1 ' I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I III 1 EASLmENT FIFTERI 11/ 1 I I V I 1 I I I \ I I I I I I I I I I �I-1 T(i fER V" \ I I I I I 1 11 I I I V FI I } L,_1__i_ I \ I I 1 1 I \ 1// 1 I I \ II I I V , I I I V Av I I II I I\ \\ 1 1 I I A I \a d M ' V \\ \\\� \ v V 1 V ` -0A / / ` � / � - 7 � ; A� v �\ I I � A / I 11 I � I/- I/ ,� v v� ��� �� _`_'107q, --- --- - • -996-- � :�9 & / / / / / /I I�`7 Op0\__ ) r-70p0-J I / v 1\\7 Oro \ v v y op2� \°ps,\ p06.\ 7008� '7 �, 0j0 t _ -1078 -- 1020 --. --1022 1024-- --1D26_-- � A A \ , / �- — - -ass a\ Z. 5 00 / / - - _ - — � , �" 63 \•- S .� - - - - . _ � _ - - v V _ _ / % ",'/ _ _ 869' SILT FENCE -� - N v WE 1 A� D 1 \ �: ---� _ ,� v ;/ / // / v�, (DNR Preserve) v v 1v _� /' / set _ 'vv \ ` I .o. �� I\ I I JJ �,I I i�l) L 1 \, A' � ®/ �3 633 r — — ' \ I I ; / P � 11� �� ' f'• � � w — \ I •\ �, I �A 1 _. _ _ �30� �i \I r p h�� / 1 I I ( 1-v — \ I \ v � �// ____ , v , _ �, 29.7 Ac. i -\ \ --- i, / / �� 62, \.\ \ \ wB \ //� //�� 626 TF J� / / --- �\\� N .. `\\\ / Q '6 �q V -7 �99 v v / / .� \ Opt •\\ ..0 q% N. v \ // / - E1u IV V T I A �' MASS GRADE - -A v v � a • C3 0 \\ ..�/ 0 .6) A( /`\4 1 A \ oai "" / A ! lV SILT FENCEIIII ------ i�/i Q_ v V •v\ 9 / a �� •��� / \ TTV 9v A -2ECTED PAD '110' // /,' / / 1 /��� v—OUTL� A Cv� / \ I I I \l 1 I` oo �� \ I ;_ I \\ /-ice MASS GRADE /U08t �N \\ -90 �� �", \ 8��"\ 15 - `Y'`" _ 1 K �, (106..1 � 1 •)\I\I \ 1 \\ u-F ,. I ' ASS GRADE _ _ A \ \ � - ® - - \I \ _ . I I A �I T `I (ho..Q0 — B02 ezoot� �m�- s.// i i i% /;O ice/ �� ----� /// D \\ -_ \\\ �, G% R .- � // /1 \ \ — C � _ -, / �Op / / \\\\ �\`E� % /Ro / / o��\ �tr�-�� w� oofi /r11 / - I �� \ 319) _ , ..; v V A v I �_ J J - =� - � _V- I���, '�` EO 14d -- -- / ��� /// \\\ A� ¢1! wv` - ��`�� t°02_�- ��\� v� A . / / / / / 04 - \ \. / / v 3 v vv __ v , v v� \I �,�, �� \( ...5 I r \ \ T V 9O1` �� , � y - _ - • 1 ®, q� ��� vv �,' vv ��� ,� \ - \ \ • STRAW BLANKET _� , ` ! _,_ _ \ / v / \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \\ / // / / \ ASS GRADE / /� / / i M v - 7006- v v v � 7 \ \ / /OS70 YI / / I \ V A V A A \ // `y�-� / / W LANDFILL / . vv v v v vI t / / / /. / 1b 7655 SA Fr. \ j \ .\0 \ \ \ \ —_ I I 'h 1 \ \ \ I \, 'l 62. T v v eoosv \ \ \ \ _/ \\ •°� � \� / �0 V v i I x \ \ \ /C2 / /// \ \ \ I \ / \/ I \ \� (4 �I 0 I z ,. 6�\pGl •. v Oq \ `\ \ v \\ \ ,(- \ /6. \ 25� i /S\j LLL / R- - ` � -0-A -__-CA �� / / e v A �--I' - \ rk� / Or ��\ O 9-p. 62r1� k\ I ` I / / l I 1 h \ I \ \\ {' \ \ \, \� 4 , e / / O O �/ w, , /I1 / l / / - ' vI _ T � V o -I \ Lin A \ V A 1 I I / Al \ 1 ..89 \ �V� ,e 2 V!1. 0' 1 I (U I/ � < 7 v \ \ \ V A�V \ l �� ? I J.� (; ..d0) �L� 1 1 I \ �� v .• 1 L� [� I 1 1 �� 20'TaAIL Tosf CONST /".•,,// \ I 1 o a 7 �y / \ T� n l�\ \ A L ' �I :� , 1\ \ / / sa R% - I //�v �1 1� V A 1 � � �/ { 1 /./ �I �� �I 1 \ ® 1 < L 6, ., _ N / .e :% Ii 1 v A 1 \ 1 GRASS CHANNEL G `� / � v \'p �� 1 � 1 g __ . / SUPER;TLEVATE ROAD FROM STATICS(y O C q�p \ �\ ' d �/ / BMR- LANDSCAPE 42+50 TO 53+751. ROAD TO DRAIN ' `� ti ej,/ 1A AAA I o.V � AND SEEDING PLAN TO THEI SOUTH AND EAST \� �4'� �<1 A ion i BY OTHERS / A \ \ V ♦ A I / A A ♦ �p V\ I _/°� ins ` _ Av \` \\ \V A A A l�� �� OAFTE m/ �_ v A < r UCTI N \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ \ I / A \ \\ A 1 V A. A i �� % \ \ \ \ 'p,�6 �� m \ -0 _ i , \ V ,� v A A \ a �E9 \ / tbv I` A A I 1 A / I A-- �a , v y x v A ° P ,_ --k-a. v v _, V / �� -� - ��ogv vv // vvV Av_ _�/FILTRATON\ 1 ��;' -� 1 I I �� , 1 ,, �� " p u- u Or . ,'may/ v1. ; \ � � /" 1 \ \ MASS GRADE \ �1� V - 25 m\ 2 ��' e V ^,� 1 / 28P / / / - Q / /I /Q� / Z4 18 / ',- / 4F / - /- -. 7 / - / _. _ i�c I // /' 1 1 1 1 I I I 28� / / 01 II �a /// ) / / / or/ OY w �/ / // // OIT L?�� % / - �� / / � � � / / / //// / / / /// I / e I 1/ -` 1 +� 10-: 199 \� e5 =`o. _-,,-� BASIN I Sawa -=- /�� T£f I 4s� \ -_ _ - �ovv // I \V BOT10100 (zzi0i) ,, DA SB7 � w I I / b \ \ \� / \ HWL1012.3/ s�vv vvV vvv //� �� BUFFE AVE ; ADDEid-1300SF _ e �� ,� I / A 1V 1 (4. / \ I / I / - \ v J % `v ,--���\TL�T F // JI I �V A \ p`"� V A -V .- ..•1 V A III I 1'\ \ \ �\\DRY CREEK BED H / / / S \ 20'RAIL Eit�SEMEN3`\ AV A A LANDSCAQING / 0 3,. I TO B DRAFTE AFTER v �� 1 AND SEED1ING � ,. esz�ou 0o *a9 — -- L--sue- � r � pr,D-2- i e NWL 1008.0/ � 1/ HWL 1010.5 : 7B1:6I I C NSTRUC IONv v \\ PLAN BY OTHERS _WETLAND / ) �' ( �. A A �� / FSR L_ �} \� ', i I_- osels�� 5 , 1 �>_ _� a y_n '�" �S \ \ y y/ / �1p4�,,, I T 1 I I \ A \ \ V ...... , l/ �l 3'OT �/ eQi / 1 I V A\ A v v .- / / �` / / I 1 \\ �a� \/ / / ,� / 11 / \ \ o A B8 > / -� // 1, / (70,34 � / / \ �\v � SB13 / nE r_H / / _ A jv �I �/ /\. ` �, �,� .o—T� OSB9 o� ----- 09, - _ I '. Oa100 �p�.g� - 1 1 1 B10� �B73 __. oo� ,y , __.__- _ _.___._____.. -. ____. BUF ER AE._ /, REM�VED-1650SF I (Preserve) �\ /f ,..� ENKA MAT / \\� RQ=INFORCEb i / I°D. EOF-SEE DETAIL \ � ��� 1. Ac "� V =� �. / /'/�1 ,/. L)FFER AVE.. .� `� // �y//. / F F P B7 e�..rw�-.-- //� /// // // �`�_- ., B 1 n c+ � N/ / / r�DDED-1700 F , �j� di 3., / / _ _ - / Q•.4o 7 / / I 7�� _sB'��� — • � _�P I I- a u - o A IL"14\� ��� _ � BUFFER AVE �� --> __ \� - - �- - �� MOVED-165o 1 / I /o �k - _ (1 � _ 4_ �'�i°I+;)` i 1 / / a �I� .- 041 1 II B7 -i-- b` -�°60 (i / 42p O.U.. i o1 / 1/ 1. ei �,(�' I • / GRASS CHANNEL E / / BMA- LANDSCAPE AND SEEDING PLAN /8YOTHERS ,_� / ,_ / —' ,— B2 '� / I � --I J ---- i I i--------- V 1 -- 1 r F7 SB9 I I 1 J-- ---- I I - CUSTOM GRADE - ll I - i I _ I � II A II I +-PR-RY_ I I I I _ -' _- _ � , i -_ //�� �- -F6 CUSTOM GRADE -- i - 5 7 SEPTIC 6P 11 , _ 2e f 1 I. ) 1� '�- ��.. „I -_I QRASS , \ BMP'-LimerseAPE N o P� ,.•1� v R� AND Aj,Y 599i YOTHERS ��0 v �fP7/C ( � �. - � 1 AR '� �� 1 '60�'RA ^ 1 6012-C STOM �- - ®Z ��� �` - 1 101E-- 1 CHANNEL I 1�I ' 1 SEEDING PLANT' I 1 !s -1G1? j , 1 --1024- � I '•, \V i GRADE - 1026 -- \ SB11 I \ 10 P — 1 of ZOL :. fiy �0 + �i -'---� I 1 �N� �� 6 3'.: sfP -� 1 ' I I AR` 1--- ---- \ PRl Eq. CUSTO�JI'C�fiAQ - - s1s� _- _ 1 A _- - __ _ t� _ ,,• 1, 71L'_ \/ _ 4\ A A\� - - _ AREA _ \\ �� e _- °:, \ 6'. to `-1 -\ \'�- __ O _ VA! \ O.£ y�F� / \` .,f., _ srn 3scpo roROAD \ \ \ \ PITCH -TRAIL TO RIGHT- v `� ��- �7p70 -2_ / to72_ �/; -to`4p / / -70,6- 1 \-- _ \_ - / - 107 T -IOt - -- _ T�--1020 � �'- - / / - 7 �- ---. _ / / 1022-__ I --I 615 #� / //--1024- - / - - / / '7026 `f`� / AT �E_ _ / U� / t'8- - p� I� \ 6 \ A , V. A �sr V `� =,\ •$\�� 07 `_ \ `_ 4�- �. - A ` \-_ - _ `_ --- 078-- cc --- -m 70 z �1�11� _-_ ?0 �w �gz �/02 ai °w chi 'L -- 2 F � I _ �ii 7`1� �-�- 724 ¢¢~ -'' 4 0 oz - - 4. - , �) 1 . is v --- SCALE IN FEET V A V Av \ \ \ v-_ A A Av - - _ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ FIELD FTT RF IL \ _\_ '� ✓ BETWEEN E ISTIN TREES \ I 41t ° !1 �o.,nov Il I _ nRFA __\ 19 Lb01 �� 1 \ , �\ lif,A _X /—Sf-RZir� P ln..~mC1 , DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS es ‘`' u2i r s,„,, FF __ u, SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. CITY PROJECT NO. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 Base SGF 1 DLS DLS DLS DLS DLS DLS 02-12-2016 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S _ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST , INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. n U"�C -- DRAWN BY 2 MEDINA, M I N N ESOTA 4 ,' 26 �" DSG 3 CHECKED BY 4 a 4, 1 150SOUTHBROADWAY WAYZATA,MN.55391 (952)476-6000 16 P`P�2 DLS 5 CITY REVISIONS FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date:. 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 DATE 6 05/01/15 DEERHILL PRESERVE 7282-010-200 \ 1 ( I II I I f m ----\ ---i0P0-V A A\1\ \\ V A \ \\ V vv \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ FIELD FIT -511RF T�IL \ , BETWEEN EXISTIN TREES - \\ 20' TRAIL EATEAT TO BE DRAFTED AF BR CONSTRUCT \ON \�\ \\ 1 GRASS CHANNEL D BMP-LANQSCAP AND S EDING PIL'A BY OT ERS I / 1 / / / / I / / / // / // / / /•/ / ) // FIELD FIYTURF TRAIL / / BETVVEN EXISTING TREES `/ I / / / / / / / / /. / / // / / %//> / ///// /,' / / / / / / / / / / / / / / // / l / I / / l l l / t / I II / / / / / / I I / // I I I I / 1// 1 1 1 I r 1 1 1 \ r 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 \ 1 \ 1 I 1 \ I I \ I I I\ 1 1 1 I I \ I \ 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I , I I 1 I I I I I / 1 I / I / / / I 1 I / / / / / / / /� / / / / / / I I , / / / / / / I / / �� / / / / / / / / / / / / 1 / / / I / / / / / / I / I / / / 1 / / / / \ I / / / 1 / / I / ) 1 / / l I I I \ / I I \ I I 1 I I I I I I / / I I I I I i / / / AVOR*H / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /11 25 0 25 / 50 101) i / / , I I I I I I I I 1 \ SCALE IN FEET / // / , / / // / / , /� / / / / ( I I I I I I (d9 / 1/ / 1 7) 1-7/T — I/ F;1.0 ,// QUSTQM'GRADE • I / / �r / / I — I I I 4-I—I—I—I— I I I I 11 ', � USTOM GRAD GRASS CHANNEL E // BMP- LANDSCAPE / AND SEEDING PLAN BY OTHERS _ (s14sotl _ — £:BE01 dB OA -- -- — —S9bIlL 30 o.saol d� — — r\ i y � � / v QRvMP� / SEPAvC \ \F 8 I' / \CUSTOM GRAB R 5b� FR V A 3` , WETLAND FILL \3823 SR FT. -WETLAND 0.1 AC. i \\ r DRAWING NAME NO BY DATE 1 1 \ S830 1 I {I L 1 I — ' 1 11 I I 1 9829 Ti 2 ,101r•onpF REVISIONS Base SGF DRAWN BY DSG CHECKED BY DLS DATE 05/01/15 2 3 4 5 6 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS DLS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S DLS 03-31-2016 ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING DLS O4-19-2016 ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS 4 _ 1 1 , 7 I I �I I os i i o r\ L / I \1 6 z 34 0 10559 105$.53 00$7.0 SC / ET ,0� USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STR CTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. CUSTOM GRADE 10118- 11 QRASS CHANNEL I I I BNIP'L7cNDgeAPE AND SEEDING PLAN I \ �YOTHERS 10�:24 ��.1 --10LC AREq ! ----- 60006-Cl�ST_OMGRADE —10E--� —; -- 1)-1 \ i II 6 I - 1 x 1p / / / / iQ32__ --- 7 / CUSTOM GRADE / / 34, / / 6'. _/ //// GRASS,CHANNELJ _ BMP- LANDSCAPE AND SEEDING PLAN BY OTHERS STA 28+00 TO ROAD \ PITCH-TRAYL TO RIGHT BUFFER AVE.-- MOVED-1650 SFNt \ � �^ °\ \ �\�\���_ ///�_1016_ `11p14-�_ CUST -ITGR1QE //./'c - 701g_ _ T 7076- _ '\ \� -1°1 7022-_ gym, J L 2 s / 3p 3 SERTI _ 3 P 7026u� s _,1 0+ / 7026 / 1028— — \ �iWsTotacrzoe—vT/ �)o4a-��/ \ \ ) A i //// DRY CREEK BED I \ / / LANDSCAPING \� \ � /�/,/�-1050 —� t ANDSEEDING ��� v k / j T, \PLAN BY OTHERS \\ // ,,/ / eF� / 7 \\ �\ \ / / //� f \ \ / ( I 1 �+ 04Q7 \\ //// \ I CUSTOM GRADE / •v�� / / v I ' q '��/ \V I 1052 s2_ / I I 1`v I, , I �\ \\ I\I I o� yy i� I / / Q\ �/ \ \I WETLAND ENHANCEMEA PLAN BY BOPRAY i ��// 953.0 x I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 SCR WETLAND OUTLET ELEV-1051,0 "Areser* I II 0 I/ (0.3 AC) j N SATHRE—BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 SB20 CUSTOM GRADE / CITY PROJECT NO MEDINA, MINNESOTA 3 1p10 s� 012- _ \ [,Jq� f'' v✓� J, I �1 11 I \ \ \\ 70% \ \ � \ V v -1042 — — — 300 L.F.OE D412 CONC. CURB 1044',� T= MEDTAN BULL ( _ — � s NOSE DETAIL i046 L ( 1048— I _ 1050-�--� it 5A.41 I 07 I � / 2 mow' Sao �°E,W u�Lc. Imo /I F4o / I 1/ i2 4 VIEr E 6 \ w V -.7 ` 004,, w s \ /008_ a 1p1p _ _7072_- 1014`�_ �\ o — —_Iola- -= —__ _--- 1020-- -1022--���\ — —1024 — — — — -1026- — — _tr'— _--1030--� o _ \ �\ L-- --- \ — 7038� Al) 104p._ _ ��� \ '1042___ ��� \ � — — _7044 - _ - _ '--�-c�INs tR�CIg INS 114L- TEN-P-OR 13AR MTES---- l F3Y DEVELOPER �9 1) I I / / / / W ; E-7 / ET E-8 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC \ FILE NO. 7282-010-200 26 / I I I I l / / // I I I II / / / / / / I I I I 1 / / / I I I 1 I / / / I / // / / / / / / // / / /� // �� / / / / // / / / �� // ,/ / / / ,' ,' / / , // / / / , / / / / / / // ,/ , , / / / / , // // / / / // , , / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / , / / / % / / / - / / / / / / / / / / / , / / / / / / // // l I I / I/ i / Ier'/' / / I 1 / / / I I � I I I I I I // / / // ,/ / , // , , // / / , ,' / ,/ / / I I 1 \ I II II I I I ) / / / ,/ // , , , / / / / // /` / / / , / / / / / / \ \ � / / `� v ILJ ____:),,,,us, T 1 li r I 1 /� / `�0 )I ERN /L \ 510 ( ,I / Syp/ � I -- ����, 671�SEPT/C610P � •� / I �1 �I �4 57 1Fc57 - I (1 �.°�.o,) �-� 5� // — // I,�-0+300 _' _ —0521 I — — — / f W — — — _� }l� — L FINIIY) \ -� �; W r" 5 p T T Nsc / wET sc-u J 7l — ARfq �-�, I _ WETLAND �n I m 'o 0 o uJ - — -- — // v - / �e / �. h�° ri) 0 / — �/ I E I§�io '01I_ �. _ _ —u / / 1 �,, -- �O / CUTLET os6_—/ k ELEV-1051.0 �—�--- I 5830 , ,-_�®®��2 •�� II I I Ns / i i �� I , 1 1 i, 1� )1- v /�'ET-SG-W_ _ _ — f do ,// �;. -- itr �� �,(0.3 I��, �; .ds) ; / � o �- I < 1 L rl 057.0 �1 ` ; o� �^ ®� ®�7 ` \ I o '���®L//1 W 1 / 29 I / <) 1 /' ' 1 I II �\ �O I I o I • ��� / I `— —�— I 3 0 . i105946� e s, II \ \ � �� �� �,1 / p.,. I \� I I WETLAND ENHANC ME (0.3 AC) / / I 1 / Ei _ - 1- :� �t 11 �� / -/ III PLAN BY BOPRAY - / ) Edq� �( l �_I% , 1 .- 1 � -z I W5� ET E-3 .q4, , ,I; --T— _ CUSTOM GRADE I _ `1 - - _ _ '� c I I �� rn I F off. o v 'y ENVIRONMENTAL / / (> ' (Q .9,) III vI' / RVICES / � // f' / , 20' TRAIL EASEMENT / I / / / / - TO BE DRAFTED AFTER ( /7,; / // ' II )III / / / i/ / A\ CONSTRUCTION 1��0. �� / /�I // / /��/ -// // �/ = II-, // I �� �// �_/ \\ / / I / I 1 \ i \ \ \ v / // / / / // / / I / I 1 I -I � V // / / // // / j I / / I A v �\ I / // / // / 1 I J— / A v\ V I I , , / // I I I I I I I \ 1 III I I / I I / I / / / / // _�1 / / _L _ / I / ( / / \' / ( / I I I 1 I / I I I 1 / I I I I 1 I I I / I I I I I 1 / I I I I I I I I / 1 1 1 1 1 I I / / / I I 1 l ' i i 1 1 I 1 / / l I II I 1 / l l I I I I I l l / l / / / / I I I \ l I 1 V �� // / I I 1 / I A / / I A 1 \ WETLPND F1L� �655 Ski FT. I 1 A V V 1 I 1 vN 32+0' / 1 // q,I,105�d 40 / 11 I / / , // /� \ f�a. , / / / /U / V✓ai '�q 2 1 I 1 II '1 52 _/� / /i��� / �, ® LOT_ H_ I I 11 �,SC /WET. 1/ _ t (h058.8 ) \\ II '`� // WETLAND `� OIJTLOT I vI / /' /° O' 1 I /, // II / / �7. / �)/ � �„e 4-, 2i) °9l , s ( 6 Pa31 / LP ��i% Pam, ; /� �8 �� F 13 / CUSTOM / ��% � i T �� � � � _ T �or� oo N -�1 GRADE a� �� / / 1 � 1C��` /I �V , I I \\ v 31 Oo A\ v 1105 \V vv o. A \\ v . ;Ol \\ V , \ A\ .(Man. - 1� / �/ . g Ex. xwi-los3.�--�OTAT �� 1.9 AC. /i r p ,Q� � PR0.HWId 52.61 � �(1.2 AC) / �� v ohm 1 ��; / � / ` ' 7 �, / 1 a , / / / / / / I o / �/ / / .- / / / 1 �i,—v 10' / / , ; �� //, �/ / / V I A (ii.. �) K . �, I -// • / ,. / V0 I / u 'Z o �/ I U / S' ,ass / / —_ �� v vv weQ \ / - /` rnwc�-i 17 ,q / / �t� ---- _ ��\' u-j' ��\ A\ �I` //,q,�11�ii, / � I L1 1/ V �`�' L J — -- �•-- - �� 5 V����1�50 �1J8L�iLT FE�CE — —�� U=f !� e� _—_ -- _--'� _ — — — — 54• / 280 L.F. OF D417 C'ON6ETE-CI�RB �\ 2- MED BULL NOSE DETAIL P'- `-� P I / 1 / v < A ' �� 5 �/ \ / 0�v o ° sPRIM �. —�I h� 1 ,". ��\ /� 5 6P I Q' (�o 27 ��j 1 )�oO a \� -) I 1 �O j v ,9 •§) — �� ,h' �/' w A / -- - -- sE V � p r —� e". P7-/ 9 �- // — Y '\ \V\� csg 1 is 1 �• -/ /.. , V �// °��� Ir o 7oss____ 1 /. Y / / / / / / / �/ F 56' CUSTOM '-- / 1 — 1 G P �� �P� P s5 P/ EP �56.• P .. 21 14 GRADE / zak�°y11 �� I \\\ - JAY SB25 �^ �� �, m �r V RASS CHANNEL 'o AP- LANDSCAPE 'o rnA fr� t' \ °(sy AND SEEDING PL�N BY I�THER / GRASSCHANN L � fF;,� \ -- ,��;,1osa=_ / y .3 �� BMP-LANDSCA E \ AND SEEDING A, .� � __•____ vv EA I j/ I II / v Ce /' 11 �b — _ , v /� ' ,— �� 00,' A\ \ i .� �V A/ / - ` T O A A / ' / —,,� —'� \ s / �-- S v , �' i i - 5 \_ // � v i 5 V \ v A / / OT TTT OT T / , lJ 1 L 1 J 1 /) V .,. I I / , I�1 t . 1�1 / �. / h �T / 1 LI (� <� �• I I 1 j 1 I I V 1 V 1 1 1 1Y� I �V l // / / , / / / I 1 1 \0I \ 1 / 1 I I A \ \ �V - _ � / I I \ \ V \ I \ A$5V �� I j �I — _ �< I , ��� /�-. / / I ��� '> /l '_ / / I I -� 1 / l I / I / ,// / / / / / I / / 1 I / / / I ( / 1 / 1 Of� HI I I A 'I I� vV Av \ I II \ \ \ I \ \ \ V I \ \ \ I I Ab V A A\ \ 1 I \ Q5 \ ,50\ \I \ / — — —\ / / , / / // __) / I / l / / y / / / / /' Q00 I _ � / i � 63 PLAN BY OTHERS \ g� P¢ �0a � o / I ._ _ ��. A i / �� I / 20' TRAIL EASEMENT \V A `s / I1 5 - 8' y / — — \ \ \ c+-�" o RY TO BE DRAFTED AFTER I I 1 •` CONSTRUCTION �O 1 / \ / ,� m -icy �' o TT \F15 - USTOM \ __ I Y • - \ � �v �5.a1 ►v •:-�� \ �� GRADE . <v I,52 Q :� 213 /21 S`pT23 I �� wo•/� o i \1 05g--- ---I V• vI / SB24 �� � I SB21 \ 4 I J `. — — I I \" \ \\` — — — -------------� -- VV ETLAND B ' • °�v - 275.DOUBLE ILT FENCE - - -/ 217 \\ / ,\ ,/• �\ �. A P•MA13L� 5 5&1P�. .1 • - (1os.01 I - j - _ _----- � _ - - - - �.. r, Pre , - v i y \ �\ _ \\ \\ \ SG��L�If�FtE�V A I V � \\ V II I AV A \1 1 I 1 ��I I V A V 1 1 I \� 1 V I 1 \ 1 I 1 II I I � \ A I V M i l l i _ L 662 A�iEA ,: /� /� \ \ i--. / AV / �_ �.� _:—_ —__ �/ / 11V. I �/ I 11 A 103 5� n A / ) 1 GRASS CHANNEL C � �� / ._ 5, J� J�� Iy-^L ���_���,Jk��'�'�h�/��.k_BMP LAND�SCAPF�AND � � �� — la . '—� SEEDING-PLlAN`B'r -__ N 1 qr..41) DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. eEks �`' u( i suR` F� :_' s, SATHRE—BERGQUIST, INC. CITY PROJECT NO. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN D E E RH I LL PRESERVE P R DC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 Base SGF 1 DLS DLS DLS DLS DLS DLS 02-12-2016 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S _ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS DRAWN BY 2 M E D I NA, M I N N E SOTA 6 ,"' 26 ,/" DSG 3 CHECKED BY 4 a ', .,., `% o„, y 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 'vim P`P�2 DLS 5 Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date:. 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 DATE 6 05/01/15 DEERHILL PRESERVE 728 Iac.fr, iM I�fi I I HU i ✓ . I or tJ,-1, Ru-` - - HU H I Hu A n y —OL // 1-`-‘, \ \ \ \ vC v Iv - I v \ T\ \ \ \ x vON vv _v� v� 1 till __ 6 �/ a - I Og4V CUSTOM GRADE\ ,((<,- , rl A' VI ( A\v v /'AR/ �v v v..v �v vv5 qRy, vv v 1\ •vv v v A ���v. i��\\\ \ b o \ \ F15 QUSTOM GRADE / // I II II i j / 1 I I I \ 1 A 1 I V A I I I 1 \ I A 1 V A\ I 1 V v v v v vv v v v v \1 \\\ V A A A 1 I , I // ,- / I 1 V A v \V A A\ V AV A\ \ V ------------�` \ \ \ \ 1 I / I i // 1 \ \ \ \ \ YaRP\H\ \ 1 1 ( I / i� / 1 A \ V I Aj \ V A V A 1 \ V A 1 1 A I / / / I A A 1 \V A A V A\ 1 1 / / y/>✓>u� 1 A V 1 1 1 1\ - \ \\ \ \ \\ fi.,` \\ �I.-(/-..-.,�...-.. i --� -_-''..-_ -. � 50-i --2 --\..10-' 21.,150I •-1 "4d0 - III \ \ \ \ �, I onus / Hu OH/u HU HU I OHU1 I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ / I \� 1 �1 t onu - \- Hu- I Hu I onu on nu I I off aw F v v pHu oHu I I OH u -SOH. -..- •u "0:44\ \ I // I 1 1 1 1 1 1 \\ \ \ au H I 1 I _, - -.-o---o,-o oo.o_o.o_o-o 0 0-�'�-_-.. I l / / / � 7 / 1 1 1 1 I I l / / / / I 1 1 kikat40 4 0 i 6 � i/ / / I I II A— I Ot" ajg ' l 1 I s l2 I /_/'-----y-_- I I A II I i //---- _-/--f,1 I I 1 lI ,,. I C......iti ' I / y\ I ` II I l l/ �S / 1 v I ' Iv 1 I �2s v I 2 r 1 / - / I I 1 II D. / \ / 1 1. I T-�/ j 623fT� 1 / / I ------ I 1 IL ww o y y� 4.® // /� � � 1 I I I ,t,c ,,,,, 0 �/ / v I vV A / I poi o I, v I L Av / / 1 0 0 o a a \ v I 1 / // // FusjoMGRADE I I / j ' I \I A \ �\ ''''''\ s _ -- -9 / // f / /l / l I I I I I A\ V v I I -- /0,8- -- - 3 P � T / / � -1 -1 _L I- -L-i � -1 �� I vv --- - ---- v 0o -_,/ / I / / I 1 I I yi� \\ V , N - � �',,s ��-----__-- ��-- aRFq i -o-- - - I- •_ _ •-� •� \ A\ I - -GRASS CHANNi4 - ---_1___ ---_ �_ -_ ---\�-� � \- 1 � \ \ BMP- LANDSCAPE j vi I �_ 1 T- \� `\ \ \, \ \ \\ - --N�o \ \ - i �o /\ �- A- \ y \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ '(- \- � -' -�V A AV A AV \Vv v\ -) --'C % \F2�\ \v 78Riiy - 1o26 - \ Y "'CC o_ qR \ \-'-A V A\ MASS,GRADE \\ 5. v vow "v v vv_ V `, v v � v A A V A \ \ -- \• \ \ ��� ‹..1 , y � v SS GRADE \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \��' ^\ \ 707\ \ 4 \ \�\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ _ \� \ vvv; v vv v vv N. vvv v v v v vv \ \ \� `� \ \\ _---- \ \ v - vvvv v v v vvv v v v v v� v v vv \\ '/OFF V v \ \\\\� \\ \\\ \ \\\\ \\ \\`___--- \\ �\\\ \\ �\ •\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ tb. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • \ \ 70,\ DRAWING NAME Base SGF DRAWN BY DSG CHECKED BY DLS DATE 05/01/15 NO 2 3 4 5 6 BY DATE REVISIONS DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATI ON BASINS DLS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S DLS 03-31-2016 ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING DLS O4-19-2016 ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. P • WARY \562 \ A0EA GRASS CHANNEL C G $MP- LANDSCAPE AND . SEEDING PLAN BY OTHERS _ onu Hu HU OHtT i �\ F 18 \ CUSTOM GRADE q(TFRN>9TE- / 0o c v ar 3-FIBER B ( ALTERN, 1' �- / PER ELEVAI CUL0SFte- TO DRAIN `TO 'NNE NORTH `.. \ ,�cA 9 �/0Y2�0 A. ,2 \ IO�AO \\ \ �s V A / \ // \ \\ \\ �..�\ \/'� \\ \\ T\'\ F24� \ ' 0 / -, \\ \\ \ \ CUSTOM 6RA E \o d, \ T- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` 0 \\ \\ V A\ A\ V AV A �� \ V N A V A \ V A 'off � A V A v, v a32 v v V v I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 GRASS CHANNEL I/ BMP- LANDSCAPE AND SEEDING / /'p I PLAN BY OTHERS 1os5 ei ETLAND - EX. HWL-1055.2 - e F28 CUSTOM GRADE oU\LOT L, N \ -GRASS CHANNEL --W -AND tl (Pres.) 0.2 Ac. ' OHu �Hu a.' HU � Hu Hu „u OHU / OHU OHU - -105_- / N V BMP-LANDSCAPPE_ _ _ / ' -- - / �j N AND SEEDING \ \PLAN BY OTHERS / -<T'" / \ N \ / ,\ v GRAS/8 C AE� BM -LANDSCAPE` SEEDING I AN RV IITHFRS N SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. MEDINA, MINNESOTA h� o � /^ I / B' / Wa�// / f I I CUSTOM GRADE --1042-_- 7 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC 0 FILE NO. 7282-010-200 26 UEERHILL PRESERVE 7 1020 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 31 SLOPE BOULDER RETAINING WALL TOP OF WALL 984.0 BOTTOM OF WALL 980.0 21"APR 121 LF_ OF 21" R.C.P. AT 0.66% CENTERLINE OF DEER HILL ROAD 3+15 1 SLOPE BOULDER RETAINING WALL TOP OF WALL 982.0 BOTTOM OF WALL 938.0 211APRON-979.3 Pci cis m -1+50 \\ -1+00 -0+50 0+00 \ \/ \ 1 1 1 \ \\ \ 1 I I V A \ \ 1 I A \ \ V A A\ \ \ I V A \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 1 I A A A vv \ \v \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \V A \ 1 V A v AI V A \ V A A v V A v N. V N. v .„..) V v v 5- 0+50 1+00 , ��_ l l� l__l_v/v� 1020 /c ----/ -/ / v v v A / / / cA5 o ; . o v �, t / S l / - \ \ 9 ki,v,0 / \ o 1010 / ' / \ \-, �Qo \\ —\/ / �\ \\ ., ,\ \\ \ ___/ /�n,v A , V A / \ \ 1000 990 960 970 1+50 1 / / / � / / ' 7,600 SF WETLAND / " � / / BUFFER cRakriew - /// /, / / ,, // ,��_\ / / / / 041t. I_ IP01� RPOLE / / / V ,� \ J CLEAR ZONE(25')� Ru / /� _ ��� x.,._ WETLAND FILL / / / ���----� ��f� �1 4�5I�SQ FT. / / // / / mot' w• �/� / / / / /� / il / / / / / / / / / / / /_ / / // / // N / le _//// ////////// /g96DES/ / _—�— / / / --- a � L 1 . )998 • \• • V v V A \ V A� / /% r\ \\\\ \\ \ \^/\\ \ l \ \ \ \ F2 'offO \ \ \ \ CUSTOM GRA E 'o W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6, \ \ \ j_ \\ \ \ \ \ op \ \\ / v v vv v • o� v v�/ v\ \� \V A A\ \\ \. �). \ V A� / / / 1 1-5 \. \ /\ ) /\/ / BMP-LANDSCAPE- -- / AND SEEDING PLAN BY OTHERS / CUSTOM GRADE /,/ GRAS28'CHAN E\ BM9- �ANDSCAP-E [Qn1D SEEDING FLAN BY OTHERS \ \ \ \ <1� Y \� x \� v / \ \ 31 \ vv vy vvv vv �v �y/2/ vvvv °o �� \ \ 333 1 1A \\ \\ \ A A�%`'6 X /k �V �_4 1 \ 1 A \ / / / V v 7° �� � 3B � \ 1 A. o a V / /A �\ V _7�-0 \ \ \\ \ • 00 1 ,.,, / / . / __ -- ) — — — —(1-026.6) - -1-02-8--!°-32-- 12- 0.?? ?'• 5. f. DRAWING NAME NO BY DATE REVISIONS Base SGF DRAWN BY 2 CHECKED BY 4 DATE 6 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS DLS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S DLS 03-31-2016 ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING DLS 04-19-2016 ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. 0SETEHDEIRNsG PLAN BY --°'-'95"11Y\0\-01kE-\ \SILFE101.:E: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 POWER POLE CLEAR ZONE(25') DOUSFE. SILT FENCE 25 'SCALE IN FEET 100 SATHRE—BERGQUIST, INC. SEEDING PLANL .160_,B___-:_-______:47500;NT346.TE;L 1_ :5. 871 2 ;77 -TL,:1* 1 • 5 34 PITCH TR"graTRIGH1-1- FILTRATION - WETLAND A CITY PROJECT NO MINNESOTA POWER POLE (Ground Elev. at Wetland) , GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC 7282-010-200 26 7 �� -7010_ v v ,255 i��� �'� 7� _I�/ 7 os '1 _532P 7008- t, 1020 \� \lq\ �/i -'? / // I \ /OOti - 53 1010 1000 990 980 970 960 1020 \ 1 v -- — —, ��� �� �� ��� ��38 ��--tooa — vqT� �v q o �1 - � / ) ,. ,, � 004----- &- CUSTOM GRADE" /� ��- -1002 _----_- \ `Op - ------ 4� U / \4� // / Jpp. _ 1000STA �✓.� / 6 n; PIT 1010 0 we. 7 v �H0 X/ --_-_ �0,--- _ ' \ -POND 4— — — —1000 — — — -- V NWL9870 - _ P� H1NL 989.6 J v v POND sez�` w�9 v `v v �v v sot-___— \ \ \ \ a, ♦ \ \ / / i 24-� i�� °pop < - -- \NWL980.0 s A 9� �v A A v v ����---1008- seoso WL981.6 00��KAMAT. 990 \ \\ \\ <�L - _ - \ a ss2 \soo s s \ R NFORCED `E f� EEQETAII� \\ UPER\ELEVATE ROAI"06 GA ASS CHANNEL AA FRAM STATION 4+30 TO \ 11-V00. ROA�TOI SIN- �i ��--saa= 980 - - (Ali 3 \ \ s s� I \ BMP- LANDSCAPE AND TO THE NORTH i � � n .` %- / $j� SEEDING PLAN BY k\ ' 9� ' ' 9e7609SF WETLAND \OTHERt -0 \ _ - - 002 cp B,UFFER CRE&T1OP1-- j I / _ 350 st Boulder -- Retanm WolfV �\ PO RP LE A 998 970 / i J * - - - - - 9 CLEA ZONE(25') /.� - �� - 998. - 11 _ / 1 PO R POLE \ -\ - - _ _ } o �V ---- ..LSE SILT- a- -996 = 3= - / � I oeu am-= a \ \ ` - - 4�9 --' _ ssz � J A14 \ \ \ _(CL ZONE(25) 'qeu _ Oeu - / 1 \ \ \ \ \ aHU\ I.-� aHU 9g a2 12 eb _ - --r-------- WETLAND FILL 1 v v v v� A�--__/ , �- 9gg8z — i-�nnennm oed ET 4-85I-SQ FT \\ POWER POLE \\ \REINFORCED- o i 960 CLEAR ZONE( CONCRETE e 5 / J� �� i �� 25' i EOF --SEE DETAIL / / _ -- -- _ � � �i _ \ � \ � - � — Estimated � - -- _ I ae // -- 970 DOUI3CE SILT FENCE �� I I Wate (Groun�d� -1+50 -1+00 -0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 g6 g—' v 1 — DEERHILLRD — _v �v7,4poSFw LAB___ WETLAND A B FFEFRILL FA _ v v v r Estimated Seasonal Ground Water level v \ 2�0 sf\Boulder� I� --/��2 v v v Rv eto\ining\ W`all p A� r —v 982.BEGIN SUPER ELEVATION /l 0 1 O�,High Water Level -983.6 �' � AppO � ✓ V V A \ V A A V V A A / \ / �10o `'s- _1002�'vo g.� (r - �V I -t008 Q ml o of •j' p o � \ V I ID �\ \ \ \ � I 1 � ICA / v \ t, I. 1 d t. I17 \ m If v -- iv v 6 P �� \ \ \\ \ \ v AA of v v A \ ]v p ,Q \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ �\ .\ �� \ \ �� __--- � v- As2 a \ \ 'A \ V A\ \\ 2�� 50 �� 100 __-- ALE IN FEET_-- / NORTH , V 1026:0-- DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS CITY PROJECT NO. /"� R A DI AI/"� DR A I A I A !+E A A 1 D EROSION 1 FILE NO. Base SGF 1 _OILS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I Elias s�q� - GRADING, 1 V V , DRAINAGE, AG , AND J 1 V DRAWN BY 2 _OILS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE �`' F� 7282-010-200 DSG 3 DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. u2i r m SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. CONTROL PLAN INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. j 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 MEDINA, DEERHILL PRESERVE gA CHECKED BY 4 LOLLS 03-31-2016 ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING v�\1 n a SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE ,�' i„ - , �'/ ✓/ _ m DLS 5 _DLS O4-19-2016ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION UUU"�"�"�-u�� ---(((ram `% MINNESOTA PRDC 26 USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING �v DATE 6 DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. V cNFR3 P`P�2 05/01/15 Date:. 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 ��y oo S o 6. ol ��Q ��o oy omy 3y- x��z a_ az�� -z w 3oa 7EQ 2 DRAWING NAME Base SGF DRAWN BY DSG CHECKED BY DLS DATE 05/01/15 h a 2 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET C v) 1 < i / w a04 \ \ ---�� ���� m t�� -- --1-- of 'A\/.�������' ��I V A L��_ 'o :4-- N (����. tl 1 \\ h / / , o�� I w� 1 I f I ,, ��n _��, cl?A��a�� a��a / Z w w N��N�� ge I V mC9 CO 1 t s ��af z Q'Q / zoo e=1 s:l�� 4, U Louw, \ " _ _������  ' ����/ /'/ ��LL\ i �� \ / i 1A, ��b��// / Y}��  aQ'�� IL w��Q'����a U) U)jtwcl ��mmw����z� 0 w12 Q} ooz v vv ��I A o / o ( G zz ( I c o a I LU o o' O op w y 1 I EI 4 0 Oro os2 l /\\ P FT n z I F i Q' Z Ix z 102, ��0q pz6.. I �� I 1 II I ���� ��1 1 ' o,`"jo����FP A w ��v�� / A i o/ l ' I I l I A 1 A A 1�� 0 \ A i 705a\ _ o A U zQ i yy 2 Q' // ���� /ifs /����  / z Lyyeo��l U ww ���� i������ / % o n\ 1 08C 1080 LVC:200.00' LVC:200.00' _ HIGH PT STA: 4+20.29 LOW PT STA: 2+00.00 HIGH PT ELEV: 1049.21 LOW PT ELEV: 1049.36 PVI STA:5+20.29 PVI STA:1+00.00 107 070 K:21.69 K:132.61 0 0 66 Oi 106 8 Y'',S 060 LVC:200.00' 105C LOW PT STA: 8+36.72 I  _  050 LOW PT ELEV;1024.45 / -0.07% PVI 5TA:7+36.72 104 PAII K:42.50. 040 LVC:200.00' j 0 29010 - LOW PT STA: 11+64.83 / LOW PT ELEV: 1010.12 i PVI STA.:10+64.83 103 030 v K:284.68  8 _   o + 6iw + 59��/ 102 a a W. i 4 020 101  010 _3.88%... 100 000 0 o N�� v o rn u�'i m oN co, nO Mm o ro o v o y o oV o w roG r O p O O mO O VO Np O O O p r0 6 0 Of 0 m cli oi O OO O y O pOyO O O O O O00 OO Op O In (V O O O p O p N O O Z Z 12+50 12+00 11+50 11+00 10+50 10+00 9+50 9+00 8+50 8+00 7+50 7+00 6+50 6+00 5+50 5+00 4+50 4+00 3+50 3+00 2+50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 -0+50 JO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFYSATHRE-BERGOUISERVE OF THE RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY. USER O-BERGO LEG INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESO9TA.` (/nj/��/ y .f ����'1��' /" r,./L/ EEas w CITY PROJECT NO. S��R�� --- DRY CREEK PROFILE SATH RE  BE RGQU IST INC. ' MEDINA, DEERHILL PRESERVE 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 m 1�� M I N N ESOTA P RDC P`P��0 I FILE NO. 7282-010-200 1 2 3 4 _ 5 6 DLS DLS _DLS DLS DLS DLS 02-12-2016 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S A_DD_ED_RET_WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING  ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS p C78 26 o ,,,, m m c��FRs Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 4 INFILTRATION BASIN #1 INFILTRATION ZONE 989-991 AREA-22,700 SF ACTION REQUIRED: CONDITION SOILS INFILTRATION BASIN #2 INFILTRATION ZONE 1008-1010 AREA-5,000 SF ACTION REQUIRED: CONDITION SOILS v -- 29.7 AC. SUPER�LEVATE ROAD FROM STATIO L ---- \ `� 42+50'I TO 53+751 ROAD TO DRAIN\ ca' 'N TO THEI SOUTH AND EAST IFILTRATION I e lid � � � hl %�� % 1' WETLAN. 11 � � I /BASIN#1 I F ��� ><I I, � I � 1 � ,� � A Av- ��-/FILTRATON\ 1 / I I BOT992.0 "p� I / 1 (PYeS0TV0� / V A ---_-� � BASIN#2 / I I HWL 995.3 I I I '� I 1 BOT 1010.0 h 1 ( I Cs >1 1 HWL - 989.2 / v T HWL 1o1z.3/i / (MCWD STUD I �LYvTLOT F / FOREBAY I �! I I c11 A\ `� DRY CREEK BED H 992 � \ \ ENKA MAT \ `� LANDSCAPING / REINFORCED t �_ (�. AND SEEDING / \ \ EOF - SEE DETAIL 1 BOND 1 1 N W L 993.0 9saa \ \ wP HWL 995.3 was \\ \ \ \ 992 ' C4 s95 � / --_--� - 6259IE— IASS GRADE / i r � 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET ,VORTII ��- 6 4 4. \ TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING -FOR SOIL CONDITIONING AND DRY SWALE: 1. EXCAVATE CHANNEL TO 2" BELOW SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS PER THE PLAN. 2. CONDITION SOILS WITH 2" OF COMPOST OVER PROPOSED GRASS CHANNEL AS SHOWN BELOW IN GRAPHIC. 3. LOOSEN SOIL IN A MANNER THAT AVOIDS RE -COMPACTION OF THE SOIL BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. 4. AFTER SOIL LOOSENING AND ADDITION OF SOIL AMENDMENTS THE SURFACE OF THE SWALE WILL BE ROUGH. 5. IF POSSIBLE, STABILIZE ALL UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY AREAS BEFORE COMPLETING FINISH GRADING OF SWALES. THIS WILL MINIMIZE THE DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT IN THE FINISHED SWALE. 6. IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SWALE PRIOR TO INITIATING THE NEXT STEP IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IF THE SWALE HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO INFILTRATE STORMWATER: SEDIMENTTHAT HAS BEEN WASHED INTO THE SWALE DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS CAN SEALTHE PERMEABLE MATERIAL, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE SOILS. 7. FINISH GRADE THE SWALE USING METHODS THAT AVOID RECOMPACTION OF LOOSENED SOIL. ACCEPTABLE METHODS INCLUDE HAND RAKING, SMOOTHING WITH A BACKHOE BUCKET FROM OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF THE SWALE, AND/OR PULLING A DRAG BEHIND LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT LIKE AN ATV. 8. SOW SEED AND PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AFTER FINISH GRADING AND BEFORE THE FIRST RAINFALL EVENT (WITHIN 24 HOURS IS PREFERRED). DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT ON TOP OF THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY KILL SEED AND BECOME A SOURCE OF SEDIMENT WASHING OFF SITE. SEDI VENT ON TOP OFTHE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE REMOVED TO A DEPTH LESSTHAN ONE INCH. 9. IF STEP 6 IS NOT COMPLETED BEFORE THE FIRST RAINFALL EVENT, REPAIR RESULTING EROSION AND REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM THE SWALE BEFORE SOWING SEED AND PLACING EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. EROSION REPAIR AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPACTING THE SOIL (SEE STEP 5). 1 / Fi(TRATON, BASIN �4' BOT 992.0 HWL 994.0 '(FUTIJ� -' TEMP -BASIN) ' SED BASIN \ 1 I I I � I i MASS GR ✓I\ 0 � 1 v / > vo11/ � P / it Qg _t8 _ I / BUFFEF.'A ADDEP_13 008.0 010.5� 81s BUFFER AVE. REMOVED-16` ENKA REINF EOF \ 7\0 D( z\ s. PI INFILTRATION BASIN #4 INFILTRATION ZONE 984-986 AREA-27,000 SF ACTION REQUIRED: CONDITION SOILS 1,1030-_ f -1032-10 10,10 - // \ - - BRASS CHANNEL 7022 - - L _ �c LANDSPAPE-AN6 ` 1020 --_+ r _ SEEDING PLAN �v D1a-- CROWNTRAIL L 0 \ - BY OttlERS _ - \ 4+00 TO END•- - p-��- JO 534� 25fi-I r 2,o / v-1014_- -- ,-5 4- _ I Y- �Z° A _0/2 �1002 - - - _ _ _ _ 0 1000------ H TSTA 0+00 TO 4+0�- < /ac--_-= _/06, 6 g"' PITCRAIL�O•R1GHT s` ,7OAS\ //mod -FyOND4 _------F[LTRALION_----__ -- — ` 000' NWL987.0_.-- _ BASIN-4 HWL 989.E BOT -986.0 HWL --988:5-- 990-- - � — .1 982 gas A15 9s A11 _ 998 986 989.59x: �2s- - - 988 — — — FA 1-41 DH --- -= / N>Pu odu' onu onu, onuJ--�6r-_.-1__- I, REINFORCED_ - -T- / EOF-SEE DETAIL �(MBTPdgO 1) / —Q�—Jmm DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. - EEas �`' 2 i S�R� 6� I'm � SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC.u� CITY PROJECT NO. INFILTRATION BASIN DESIGN DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 Base SGF 1 2 3 4 5 6 _DL_S _DL_S DLS _DLS _DLS DLS 02-12-2016 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S - ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING - ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS — DRAWN BY MEDINA, MINNESOTA DSG 9 ,26 ' CHECKED 8Y a ,,,, m `% cNFR3 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-60 00 'v P`P�2 DLS DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. V Date:. 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 05/01/15 N N w w 0 z FILTER STRIP SIDES E FLOWPATH LENGTH TYP., (OPTIONAL) I Ni /, , I I , ANCHOR EROSION CONTROL BLANKET WITH CHECK TRENCH PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUOUS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, MINIMUM MNDOT CATEGORY 3, 2S SEED WITH MOWED TURF OR NATIVE GRASS SEED MIX APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS CHANNEL WIDTH (4' MINIMUM) 2' TYp, I � VI I �� rl IPERVIO AR LOOSEN III IIII III III III III III II1 �'� SUBGRADE 0 A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1' — � UNDISTURBED AND UNCOMPACTED IN —SITU SUBGRADE TYPICAL GRASS CHANNEL CROSS SECTION WITHOUT SOIL AMENDMENT GENERAL NOTES - SOIL CONDIITONING, GRASS CHANNELS AND DRY SWALES: 1. INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SWPPP, PROJECT PLANS, AND SPECIFICATIONS IN ORDER TO EFFECTIVELY REDUCE THE VOLUME AND VELOCITY OF RUNOFF AND REDUCE EROSION OF SURFACE SOILS AND TO CONTROL SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF SITE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 2. INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES DURING THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 3. SEED MIX SHALL FOR GRASS CHANNELS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN BY OTHERS. 4. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE CATEGORY 3, 2S. 5. EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3885 AND MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ANCHORING, CHECK TRENCHES, AND EDGE AND END OVERLAPS. 6. AVOID COMPACTION OF ALL IN -SITU SOILS AND IMPORTED SOILS UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. DO NOT LOOSEN SUBSOIL UNDER CHECK DAMS. 7. IF POSSIBLE, RESTRICT FLOW OR DIVERT FLOW FROM SWALE UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING -FOR SOIL CONDITIONING AND DRY SWALE: 1. EXCAVATE CHANNEL TO 2" BELOW SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS PER THE PLAN. 2. CONDITION SOILS WITH 2" OF COMPOST OVER PROPOSED GRASS CHANNEL AS SHOWN BELOW IN GRAPHIC. 3. LOOSEN SOIL IN A MANNER THAT AVOIDS RE -COMPACTION OF THE SOIL BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. 4. AFTER SOIL LOOSENING AND ADDITION OF SOIL AMENDMENTS THE SURFACE OF THE SWALE WILL BE ROUGH. 5. IF POSSIBLE, STABILIZE ALL UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY AREAS BEFORE COMPLETING FINISH GRADING OF SWALES. THIS WILL MINIMIZE THE DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT IN THE FINISHED SWALE. 6. IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SWALE PRIOR TO INITIATING THE NEXT STEP IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IF THE SWALE HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO INFILTRATE STORMWATER: SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN WASHED INTO THE SWALE DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS CAN SEAL THE PERMEABLE MATERIAL, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE SOILS. 7. FINISH GRADE THE SWALE USING METHODS THAT AVOID RECOMPACTION OF LOOSENED SOIL. ACCEPTABLE METHODS INCLUDE HAND RAKING, SMOOTHING WITH A BACKHOE BUCKET FROM OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF THE SWALE, AND/OR PULLING A DRAG BEHIND LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT LIKE AN ATV. 8. SOW SEED AND PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AFTER FINISH GRADING AND BEFORE THE FIRST RAINFALL EVENT (WITHIN 24 HOURS IS PREFERRED). DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT ON TOP OF THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY KILL SEED AND BECOME A SOURCE OF SEDIMENT WASHING OFF SITE. SEDIMENT ON TOP OF THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE REMOVED TO A DEPTH LESS THAN ONE INCH. 9. IF STEP 6 IS NOT COMPLETED BEFORE THE FIRST RAINFALL EVENT, REPAIR RESULTING EROSION AND REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM THE SWALE BEFORE SOWING SEED AND PLACING EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. EROSION REPAIR AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPACTING THE SOIL (SEE STEP 5). a WCOMPOS 4 /14rSCAFUFIE GRASS SEED OR SOD 2 OF COMPOST _ INCORPORATED TO AN B-DEPTH �---" - • -- - -- — SUBSOIL LOOSENED (SCARIFIED) 4-BELOW COMPOST -AMENDED LAYER NATIVE SOIL --- SWALE SEEDING AND INFILTRATION BASIN DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE I REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. p n UJ`'-tih"�-�. IC/ �`' w�-` 6�EROSIONCONTROL P SATHRE-BERGQU I ST, I N C. CITY PROJECT NO. DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC FILE NO. 7262-010-200 Base SGF 1 2 3 4 5 6 _DL_S _DL_S DLS _DL_S _DLS DLS 02-12-2016 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS DRAWN BY MEDINA, MINNESOTA DSG 10 CHECKED BY 0 ,,,, m CNFR3 j 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 'c P`P0? DLS DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. v Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 05I01/15 I I 04 ). `H.\ `�__ ♦ \ \\♦VV' £�(aj.ra�)idl + \` \ \. \\ \` ♦ �,, / J�.+' \ ,,, __ _, ti \ \ \ ____' __—_ ' / a a VA/10 � \ � _-,-', `\\; -_ �\ \ `\ \ \\ \ � ' II ' I I�%,-�,�.w �\ --\ Q 41—tj / ♦ I ♦ r v I 'I I ' q � r _______ _ '(['yam , �y , + + a a A \♦,I �;♦. e n ♦ dun , ♦I , 11 1 ' , V A _______ _ ---_ �' � � \. AA ' g�/.` V` V I I' � '� '__ ' ', A ) r I i `� ' it ��'�� —� � \A, � � £• r 1 , m yv v r +y r I ON a r � rl 'l � / A \ + - `r. � � ra F OVA + [� + 'i I ., 1 1�' w VA. AA � �— 1 1' '1 I � +� I 'i / / t . v �) ' /Y 1 ♦ `� `� v v, `, o`� ���♦ , � + 3 j � j � a I� + + � � � � + / , II ' %'r //''" / Jl II \ \ WOW \ Or \\ ' it � �,` \ \\ li�'I 1 1 I 'I j r'2 'y% 'II � ♦\ \CN 1 ,o\' �"r-♦-. ,` 1 `. i T � ; � I I , ,A r l,�" /\. �`rZw \� \\ \ \ \.. \ �3`�� \� a 1,'1 ♦♦1\ / r/ ,''r ,♦�` S\ ♦\♦. v)`♦` 11 00 , , y z ♦\w♦ `, ^\ a a a a I p 1 I _ ♦ 1 ) �1 ,� ' '�l'-'i ,l �i � a �, \ ^aZ � -\� � .-0� \ ` `,, --'` -_ H ,� � i N F-I $' I I♦`♦♦/ � Y>I � \ l e` `l�'3 j � + 3 + a - I ,''-,\( \ \ I�\ �\ w��za`\\ laZ�="_�', ,`\\� a 1'_ ��-��- _` \\\[�`♦w �o'� \` I LT -I O -' ////J/))y{�/�/ ` ( /`' I I ��Y 1� _ � a /ter/��� / \ \ \ - \ 3�3 \ � \. I s. _ _ \ I ,{--. ✓ p � 1 ' ?\ � 1 ,( n/ `\'\\ 01 \ \ �� s �\ \\ ��� s3 + � \\,m ' o� �/ s � ♦fie♦ _____ � \ II - i' �/ 9p L ''i'/ / '�I `..i r�' I ' 'i � � \� ♦Itiw i �G$�� li 1, 1� Q, � -- 3 � � + \�\` �' ' ' I , � % _Q U -- , \`\ \\ + a � \`\ ` IINn '' ��`� os. ♦'(� I \ o \\ / // p , /✓ � \i Y� , ' � , i w`y\ ,' 0�so I I , � + r� e '\ H"� \ \ \\\ ` �I„ �^'+ `- �s� ,�,�o/ l/// i i/ gym- ,\ -�ry �o _ ----' - / `f /♦, ''�/% ' ',5 -' _ j`\ \ _ / r Oc1 \ -- / II I I \\ 11 ♦/\ / (%�'/r'//,'',r,/-" ,♦' / / I I I � 1 Al �`,'v `, ♦ �' AAA 3� \ � b _ +-�--Ir "�-i+e�� � y / = � v L _ � i � � , ' C�]i ' � � ' r r �j� _ i \I y � "_ ; , ♦r ---- I ------ - L___ li I, 'W 1 i wr\ I �' '--d',-'"� _ '/ ',%';'/e',��%lrmfi \. , ♦`\y - �/Ili _ - -__- 7 _ \ � _ _-'' a//' / ' � + ,r' 1,'� - ♦ I \\ II \I I ' r ♦ II II o , �' � rr � .♦ \ `., \ _ � - --- - - �'� ' LTA � I � e L� l� �j \ '' = I '` '' '� � _ ''� '�,� i� -� ' i � / lI� i I ----- Fi- --____ ,--� ,, - __ __ li \ \ +I ♦" I ' "r♦. ,% pl �' f 1r „ �' / II _-' r � I \ \ \ �9�0. (-( 1 a \� \`LH.li ♦ --- - —, 5.49 .5'- ----- --- _ ---__ i -- — -f,' - f� 96 ---- - -- ' / r ♦ ♦ - - --- - - - \ � '1 1 , , , I _ - - -- - ---- -- - --- F 'I II 'i --- ----- - --- - - { -- ----- -- - -- --- - --- -- } y 1� I 1 - - - -- , , ' , r _______ _ ___ ___ ___ `_ ♦ . ♦ ♦ � � � � � `� - _____ , \ , l , , r - - , ♦ . ``. --- �, '> ------------- \' �' -- - - Z- ----- _ -- - - --- - --- - --- ---- _ I \ - t\_ - - --- — _ ____-- — 'I' r1 - k -------- y -- ,- -----_-`` ' - --- -- -- --- - I (` r, I I - � - I I I ♦_/ I ♦ _ -_ _ -- _ ` � � `._ 6 / _ _ -_` ♦ --__ - ' i'I III -- \l / , - _ _ _ - - , _ - - ----- - - \ _ - _ _-_____-_ _-" ii♦ _ - - 100 50 0 50. \100 \\ ;\\��:..♦'$d0 `, _ _ , - _ -- r - _ S ALE IN FEET , ' t - _ DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS CITY PROJECT NO. FILE NO. Base SGF 1 _DL_S 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT � — DRAWN BY 2 _DL_S 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE EROSION CONTROL 7282-010-200 DSG 3 DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. u2i i m SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. MEDINA, DEERHILL PRESERVE 12 CHECKEDBY 4 DLS 03-31-2016 ADDED WET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING n a ,,,, 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 — SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE ,1' �„ - , '/ ✓/ - m DLS _5 _DLS O4-19-2016ADDEDWETLANDCROSSINGCROSSSECTION UUU"'�"�'-l-ull ---(((ram MINNESOTA PRDC 26 USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING /v DATE 6 DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. V cNFR3 P`P�2 05/01/15 Date:. 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 o.�)ffaa SILT FENS HEAV1'OUTV MEDINA ERO-a2 ------------ ------------- I----- `-' ' I , 1 • --- vvv �?b �-.��(bsors�mn � � vvvvv �yv v , v I �; ; s ,__ � vv �` v v\v �T�rE, ;•�._� ; vvv v v vvvv. v i r - r r I-U - - i�- ; ; ; ; ; ; �` 3 ; a ; ; it ❑ a �` �> _ _ r 3 , 4 I r ; --------------- _ _ -- — - ----------' i � d�'� i � V v i ', V V / a � I I ---- _�__I ' I� �� w - — - ' r I _ aonrewre ,1 ----- 1 \'� / --------- I ' 2 '_- , � I I I a�,\\�\ � , ��d - --- _ I 1 , N O M \ \ \ - _ _ _ _ L I _ 1 II Ig _ — _— -- _ — __ _------- — I � al �w IoNII�w � ` 1 IF I n r r/Il �l -' z u a � a r V ` � �!- A `Y . 'QS 815 •VA V I, � I , �, ( �/ CONTOUR LEGEND 2' CONTOUR EXISTING 10' CONTOUR EXISTING 2' CONTOUR PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR EXISTING 2' CONTOUR PROPOSED CUSTOM GRADED 10' CONTOUR PROPOSED CUSTOM GRADED EROSION CONTROL LEGEND ROCK ENTRANCE BERM ---- SILT FENCE ---- SILT FENCE (POST CONSTRUCTION) — BIO-ROLL 3 CONCRETE WASHOUT INLET PROTECTION I""-L WOODFIBER BLANKET c1 ��— 0 100 so o so 106 zoo z SCALE IN FEET DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE I REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS CITY PROJECT NO. FILE NO. Base SGF 1 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I �Eas q` — DRAWN BY 2 _DL_S _DL_S 03-11-2016 _ CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGQUIST,INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USEWITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. �`' i FF SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. EROSION CONTROL 7282-010-200 DSG 3 DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S — INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY.MEDINA, u2i DEERHILL PRESERVE CHECKEDBY 4 03-31-2016 ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING n a SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 11 5 _DL_S DLS O4-19-2016ADDEDWETLANDCROSSINGCROSSSECTION SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING �' I '/ ✓/ - UUU��'-u---(((ram mDLS �—YTPT�tt150 `% �vDATE MINNESOTA PRDCUSER 6 DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E.V�2 05/01/15 Date:. 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 _ -------------------------------------------------------------- 1, _ ----J ICI ----------------------------------------------------------- it Ulu ° ppp o. - i /i TURF TRAIL — CROSS SLOPE 4:1 SLOPE MLONIVOWI-OWGRONFESECUS 2% CROSS SLOPE 4:1 SLOPE MAX SUBGRADE CORRECTION AND GRADING AS NEEDED TURF TRAIL — CROWN o LOW MOW, LOW GROW FESCUE 2% V, 41 SLOPE MAX .. _..........._. __.._.. 4:1 SLOPE MAX TURF TRAIL DETAIL I I I F--%� --T , If II --------------- _� -� II \---- 7 II --------------------' , IT I He N, r u � 11 _ T - 11 r a i A10 �ft I I - � i { I _ I ��sRHN --------- — — ----- 'i---------------------- F o I I ¢I�I l I I ICI III III --- LL x�xaxru uur7i �sp�4 DESIGN D DESIGN S NOTES: ® io m, Txr x IDLY (z.<re oEs PA CONCRETE CURB ANDGUTTER xs7102J DE51DN D. DETDN s. DESTGN B, R ¢ R ss '" zs''" 4' SELECT _ 2-NBN. TOPSOIL BORROW S. CROWN F PLU52-AT TIME OF (p.02%MIN) WEAR COURSE q,l gBDETCH TIIXn 11/2^.SPWEB240B WEABCOURSE 2'-SPN M 845E COURSE IP'gAEs sS 5 AGGREGATE 0 3138..) CRUSHED UMEROIX SUBGRA ESTAE (MNONEMIU) SUBGRADE STPBILIZATTON FABRIC-R 02./SY NONWOVEN COMPARED AGGREGATE WE. CONDITONS REQJIRE oe s.cs xs " LOW yOUME BITUMPIOLLESIREET R G. @ 30' 3p' S TO BACK 15'TO MM D-028 MWNT TILE CONCRETE CURB S' CROWN MIN) i/a"/EDDY 1 „ t/2: 1 4 PERFORATED DRAINTRE DRVNTIE IN FILTER SOD( BEWED IN PEE ROCK 11/2 WB2012EAS WEAR COURSE 2' SPNWB5 AG BASE CO BASE, AS 10MSU55 5 AGGREGATE BASE,100%(MND CRUSHED SUBGRCK, OR RELYCLEOAGG.IDE- 3138.) SUBGRADE STABILvaTION FABRIC-B OZ./SY No—. COMPARED AGGREGATE BASE AS CONDTIONS REQUIRE NOTE: LOW —ME BTUNUNOUS STREET WRH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 1. ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER INEURABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH THE ROADWAY. 2. DRAWTLE SHALL BE INSTALLED BEHIND CURB AT LOW POINTS, S Y IN EAOI DIRECRON.DRAINTLE TO BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY DRAIN ALL LOW AREAS. DEER HILL ROAD LOW VOLUME RURAL AND URBAN STREET �20x11x� TYPICAL SECTION MEDINALERA-1ji VEE o�NL 1 f� CASE I PLAN w �� Ptah vlEw e B R4-1 30" LB I-c D ie""N• IE_ 0 `y CASE IBAC'* COLOR NOSE OETNL SIGN FACE NO'E AIL SEE CASE FOR D MENSIO\S 14N SEC. O\ B-B SECTION C-U NOTES', 1 TYPICAL SLOPE ALONG GUTTER ENE — DIRECTION. G—F, IFREON OR us (H* ED " R 3 VARI4BIE UE CUi3-EIG-T. SHAPE SAMED.4S MEDIAN OR CURB. SECTIGN O-O DETAIL MT- POST HIS AREA H SSSEVBLY PER DETAIL STRT-to IF THIS AREA HAS ANY tt-- OF AVING. ii{{spf� ro s x INSTALL 3 2a" X 3O" (KEEP RIGHT) AND Q�2, �dFncc S 1B' MN R SIGNS E COBS Lazi A —E. SI ON A SINGLE SECTON E-E T' AL- STAND CONCRETE FIAT 'NORK SHALL BE PLACED ON A OF CL 5 OR 7 AGGREGATE BASE. MEDIAN BULL NOSE DETAIL 300 150 0 150 300 600 o SCALE IN FEET I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS CITY PROJECT NO. FILE NO. USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS Base SGF 1 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I EEas sb- � — FINAL STREET PLANS DRAWN BY 2 _DL_S _DL_S 03-11-2016 _ CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. �`' FA SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. 7282-010-200 DEG 3 DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S — INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. MEDINA, DEERHILL PRESERVE CHECKED BY 4 03-31-2016 ADDED WET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING n a 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 13 DLS _5 _DL_S _DLS O4-19-2016ADDEDWETLANDCROSSINGCROSSSECTION — SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING ,�' /„ - , �'/ ✓/ - UUU"�"�'�r-urr ---(((ram V m `% cNFR3 �v MINNESOTA PRDC 26 DATE 6 — DLS — — 05-02-2016 — — — CITY REVISIONS — — — — — — FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. P`P�2 OS/01/15 Date:. 02/08/2016 LIE. No. 26147 N N U, HE UO POND 5 �9 NWL980.0 .3 \ �j HWL981.6 PT A4 -cr 3 ETLAND oo 6S Ho ol rc� oo oy °Wm 3y- N ow- u¢�u� az� —z 1w z°. 3oa y� 7EQ 2 A �g6'e6 WETLAND FILL vy I4,851 SO FT. (9 .0 \ — — m N U4, ,z' (99 EER HILL RD 1 .39 = F1],_le wee 7,400 SF WETLAND (99'7 � BUFFER FILL s o 100b.10 v 11 ENKA MAT REINFORCED EOF - SEE DETAIL \ / SUPER ELEVATE ROAD / FROM STATION 4+30 TO / 11+00. ROAD TO DRAIN TO THE NORTH / 10� 0 STA 0+00 TO 4+00 100p,66 PITCH TRAIL TO RIGHT O ------ o -- — — — ------aW J /�� �' —.mil "t ml— — m♦ — �� / Oom,,d POND 4 FILTRATION N W L 987.0 BASIN 4 HWL 989.6 BOT -986.0 / 9 HWL - 988.5 j� A16 A17 / o A15 - .2 x_ — — _ — — A-See.o-R- — — T989or - sva A13 0 A14 WETLAND A \ ENKA MAT REINFORCED -(Manage 1) EOF -SEE DETAIL Estimated Seasonal Ground Water level 982.5 (Ground Elev. at Wetland) 9.5 Ac. WETLAND A Estimated' Seasonal Ground Water level 1 98215 100 yr., High Water Level - 983.6 1040 1030 1020 LVC:193.47' o o N LOW PT STA: 8-07.76 N� 0 0 1 92 ++ T LVC:157.84' LOW PT ELEV:.996.12 1010 0 - PVI STA:9+04.50 EXI j j. LOW PT STA: 5+64.68 PVI ELEV:999.10 - a a LOW PT ELEV: 990.52 K:40.00 mm PVI STA:6+09.08" o< m ci PVI ELEV:989.99 KA0.00 1000 m PROPOSED FINISH GRADE- mm -0.86% 990 w 980 L j c EXISTING GRADE LL v W WO Z N 970 w z Oo W O O� U 0 960 m m mm R. N a c Orn Crn� rn th rnO O m � q rn ornoN rn v, om Mo O gn m in Om o m �m b Vin o b u6 o -0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS CITY PROJECT NO. Base SGF 1 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I�Eas SORB ___ DRAWN BY 2 DLS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.` w SATH RE —BE RGQU IST, INC. DSG CHECKED BY 3 4 _DLS DLS 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S ADDED AT WETLAND CROSSING INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGOUISINC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. f J�/ o 1 M E D I NA, 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 DLS _ 5 DLS O4-19-2016 — ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING r✓L/ ./ '1�' /" .... m m y `�� M I N N E SOTA DATE 6 _. DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS -----_— ----- — FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. c�FRs P`P�2 OS/01/15 Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 NORTH 50 25 0 25 50 SCALE IN FEET FINAL STREET PLANS DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC 100 FILE NO. 7282-010-200 14 X26 4 w w 0 `YA v5 eyy� e/ \ \ II Vp 950 YO o �pa O�GJG� 9a,i�� / / / 0 / 8 1 01 ° -w:9 ° � ` / / / /PREP A l � w P�-� e ) \ / / I o � 0 ` \\ � PRIMARY � � // � Trio � � �O ^_---_--------------J < �, �- ----------------- I / _ � — -- J -- - o ID�R //� i DEER HILL RD _ o� Rs000a RD F 1080 1080 _....-__. LVC:95.63' 1070 HIGH PT STA:. 22+02.30 HIGH PT ELEV: 1052.49 1070 ---- ----- -- PVI STA:21+54.49 o PVI ELEV:1052.00 N q --- LVC:421.77' `° ' K:100.00 N �? > ¢ og 1060 _-__-______-_. HIGH PT STA: 15+90.42 w. 1060 a y HIGH PT ELEV: 1040.88 PVI STAR 3+79.54 N� _-_ _ _ __ — 50 25 0 25 50 100 � ° o 1050 PVI ELEV:1036.72 K:70.90 PROPOSED FINISH GRAD E __ - - 1050 SCALE IN FEET Jz 1.97% w° _ � 1040 �. w - - > > - — - 1040 t-u °w 1030 1030 °m 0i N - ow 3y 1020 w � 1020 F T9210 K a o0-- w $ 1010 L EXISTING GRADE N p 1010 az� w I Z-z pE w z z > rc 1000 w 1000 3oa in o NO c00 N mo 0 O m0 V M 6 0 mO m „�p mC O nGimO aCo N�GOi, oO o O m wp iOn N'p' iCn mO iCn N c iCn M rSGOiaC r? w rC 0 ijo ryO y C ryO mC G C myO C C g O �O G uy0 o S y�O g nv '�O° g C C G g g o0 06 6 � 0 m0 y 0 0m0 a 07y< N0 r0 0C o 00 Nn a 00 NQ - - zz 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I�Eas S�R� CITY PROJECT NO. --- FINAL STREET PLAN S FILE NO. 7282-010-200 Base SGF 1 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ INFORMATION) DRAWN BY 2 3 4 _ 5 6 _. DLS _DLS DLS DLS DLS 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S INDEMNIFY _A_DD_ED_RET_WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING - ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS -----_------- SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY ATHRESATHRE-BERGOUISE INC. OF THE RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. y r,./L/ ��' w F� SATH RE -BE RGQU IST INC. M E D I NA, DEERHILL PRESERVE M I N N ESOTA P RDC DSG 1 5 26 CHECKED BY o ,,,, m m c�FRs 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 y `�� P`P�2 DLS DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. I Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 OS/01/15I 4 szsoA N P� > 2 11 £'S401 d9 �{r O 25 �� A, QI W �- iO - ��4ii - II ��� IL 1 E£8�1 O IIO 40 00 i Q1QC \ le i o tioy �a� I I w l95 1 E9501 � dO � � � c � 7j� �g \� p9506 � _ _ o � / I I �• I ��� atlpl i An A o - b F 1056? Cm4 \ ��Et�►11LLRV r ------------- ----- ---- d3dv �I/1d3� 56� ( os I w I Mw M % r M GF 1061.0 v I _ — GF 1058.0 TF 1058.3 •TF 1062.0 I I V 0 0 I I T10(62A? w I I � I O B H 3 rJ II I 053.3 BF 1050.3 (1053.3) B100503 T 1g .3LO to5e.d B(io52e) F1052.3 TGFF I 110055 6 )I p TF10643 I 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1080 LVC:78.03' 1080 HIGH PT.STA: 29+85.53 HIGH PT ELEV: 1060.23 PVI STA:29+83.94 a w o PVI ELEVA 060.42 n a 1070 N W K:ao.6o 0 1070 ao ° ol a PROPOSED FINISH GRADE �. < 1060 w - - — 1060 w Q 1050 - - -- - - - -- — - -L - 1050 i EXISTING GRADE oo °6 1040 1040 z� w o x�z a_ 1030 1030 a3� zz$ _' yz� 1020 1020 ,ow <11 3oa W y_ n N m N m m N H OD N O m O m m O m m aG OO m Oo ((m N�O O m N O mrm o m oNO O N V O o Om o N O mM oN m O_ V N yM m x x 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00 0+50 31+00 31+50 32+00--32+ 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00 35+50 36+00 DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING-�s����" FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. l/��� /7 ?j/ (/�Q ,� _ ,- I/ ✓/ .�,G�''/�' r�L J �Eas ��' w SCR,. < --� m SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. CITY PROJECT NO. --- M E D I NA, M I N N ESOTA FINAL STREET PLANS DEERHILL PRESERVE P RDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 Base SGF 1 2 _ 3 - 4 _5 6 DLS DLS DLS - DLS DLS DLS 02-12-2016 03-11-2016 CITY 03-29-2016 REVISED -2- 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 ADDED 05-02-2016 CITY REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ REVISIONS ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S ------------- A_DD_ED_RET_WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION REVISIONS - - - - - - - DRAWN BY 16 26 DSG CHECKED BY `� c�FRs 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 y� P`P�2 DLS DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 OS/01/15 4 I I � U 0 w o 0o wo U I U M — _ _ I----------------- } / t Z.- < w U Co w I� �� ��u�� 31VNa31lY �I L 00 l) a5o Z0 1 — 1 — -------\ v `v '99p�b�O ------------� A wo �w -i N — d d o------ °� 5 �j� (L — ------- --- — m� 0 1 0- m m Q �, o LL o , LL adwl o Q Y6 \ yCiJ� 11 11 N a \ \ \ \ I j CORRECTE PAD I ifs I � I A oP' � � vi \ / A A ` V > coco CORRECTED PAD 110' 00 \\ 6 1\ am (['6000 I E�) (m /1 Y i \ ` o" 2'400L 38 OM (9606t1 II I 01 / N V a ��Q V 9 ZLL d Ol II E'OLO^^L PRE // A 0.(y. ` O s. 9ZL0L d0I nnd9 Om` III �• / �snz/ II p`L B 4�' 1 Q �o \ —_J ww �� w m L---- ❑ --- m0 Hit —M `—_--1"' _ TT e�� TOW -- a 1 nO — vo _— _ —lo P<P�)000 r oc GF 1054.0 TWO3 � 3 / �` O BF 1046.3 n* ��� m o HIGH PT STA: 35+92.89 HIGH PT ELEV: 1054.72 1070 PVI STA:37+20.40 1070 m I PVI ELEV:1053.53 K:37.00 50 25 0 25 50 100 �> SCALE IN FEET 1060 �U 1060 LVC:315.63' � J aLLN 1050 --- - - --- LVC:382.93' e HIGH PT STA: 43+88.80 HIGH PT ELEV: 1033.69 1050 0 o LOW PT STA: 41+63.92 + 8 LOW PT ELEV: 1030.15 PVI STA:44+70.98 PVI ELEV:1036.71 - o wU PVI STA:40+65.74 R \ TB3 m PVI ELEV:1026.50 M K:30.00 < w = o N w� io 1040 K:37.00 0 w PROPOSED FINISH GRADE >' w U> w w 1040 _ a d 1030 _ ----- wc:33s.53' 1030 yo om . m o LOW PT STA. 49+76.05 3 EXISTING GRADE o v / u LOW PT ELEV: 1008.15 PVI STA:48+4g.82 U % w. 1020 > m PVI ELEV:1006.40 K:37.00 1020 7 xx <- 1010 (o Q + o z v - 1010 K <? ° x Qr - o U ¢O W K Z J =�a 1000 1000 W rc° O Nh O� NN O N c0 < N 0 o O 0p �o oN o o0 00 00 0o o ao a' o "'o o°' 0 oo `Yo'�' 0 Mo "'' N 0 0 o0 00 0�" 0 o 0 ryM 0 0 0 o 00 0 0� 0 NN on o 'MM o oM Mo O o Mo oN o o0 oM 0 0o yr No 0 my 0 0 o a 0 0. o m o� 0 0� ni o o� 0 o o0 0 0 00 o 0 0 y� 7EQ +00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00 40+50 41+00 41+50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 45+00 45+50 46+00 46+50 47+00 47+50 48+00 48+50 49+00 49+50 zz 'x DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I �Eas su, � CITY PROJECT NO. --- FINAL STREET PLANS FILE NO. Base SGF 1 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ DRAWN BY 2 3 4 5 6 DLS _DLS _ DLS DLS DLS 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 _ CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S _A_DD_ED_RET_WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING — ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY ATHRESATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF THE RIGHT AN SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOT%jA.`` ((//n�j�J�j// ��.��%a '1/y�it/" ��' w 6� SATH RE-BERGQUIST INC. M E D I NA, M I N N ESOTA DEERHILL PRESERVE P RDC 7282-010-200 DSG 1 7 26 CHECKED BY o ,,,, m m c�FRs 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 y `�� P`P�2 DLS DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 05/01/15 4 �� �� m s? do 1p Cl J / b'` PR ����� 5EY REP A \ F JQO 0 A (�� I w`v�� ��Oy0 E,8eot Al I I o / `2�2 \ti� 50 25 0 25 50 100 V7 SCALE IN FEET 0 9 \ .81 / Pv`PPe i _ _  _ 6f -- aB 1060 1060 HIGH PT STA: 58+80.92 HIGH PT ELEV: 1039.65 PVI STA:57+98.02 PVI. ELEV:1036.46 1050 m K:40.00 �� m 1050 ��N m>U> >W W JU ag no a y 1040 1040 oo 65 o o. LVC:285.32' 1030 LOW PT STA: 53+78.46 - 1030 C:339.53' LOW PT ELEV, 1012.62 800�I� PVI STA:55+21.12 u `; W STA: 49+76.05 PVI ELEV:1014.30 . ELEV: 1008.15 EK41.81 i TA:48+49.82 U 1020 LEV:1006.40 f o ��> 1020 a yo rcLL K:37.00 ���� U> > m m , Um W - 1.18% � w Wm 1010 - 1010 omy 3y�� xmz a_ 1000 1000 z 990 990 m��w 3 o a N N .2 O m O S <p N O O N O V M O V yy ��p N m r N N N O O V O O O M N N in M ��j O V O D O O m <q w r O I�� m O f'O O O ��O I�� y t�� W^ N y M N fy I�� t0 N u1 N y�� 00 00 0 00 m o o 00 W (O O 00 00 ro 0 o O 00 O 00 m NO p�� O 00 O M 00 O V V a 00 N t+) 00 N N 00 M �� V M-4 _ 00 N O 00 Oi ��� O o _ 00 N Q V N N o W 00 O o N M 00 00 1�� I�� O o O 00 0 O�� N�� o O�� V Oo yy W WE O O zz 48+50 49+00 49+50 50+00 50+50 51+00 51+50 52+00 52+50 53+00 53+50 54+00 54+50 55+00 55+50 56+00 56+50 57+00 57+50 58+00 58+50 59+00 59+50 60+00 2- DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I r��Eas su- ,, CITY PROJECT NO. Base SGF 1 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ --- M E D I NA, M I N N E SOTA DRAWN BY 2 3 4 _ 5 6 DLS _DLS DLS DLS DLS 03-11-2016 CITY 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S ADDED AT WETLAND CROSSING  ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGOUISINC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. 1 1Date: AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.` QnjQ�� f ./ '1��' /" r'L/ w ��.. m SATH RE -BE RGQU IST, INC. DSG CHECKED BY o ,^' m m c��FRs ��. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 y `���� P`P��2 DLS DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 05/01/15 FILE NO. FINAL STREET PLANS 7282-010-200 DEERHILL PRESERVE L26 PRDC llfLL gg 1p � �Q ��'os J / llp 0 oP 10 v o°// / / k 5�0� / v v \ s'szoU GJy�°Vw�� I 0 9 -A\J O ``, V' / \ 0"8E d0 vV 00 s� o FR ti \ti L \ 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET �.— -- \ 0�0 1090 1080 1090 1080 LVC:221.69' LVC:159.88' HIGH PT STA: 63+62.87 1070 HIGH PT STA: 62+28.61 HIGH PT,ELEV: 1054.47 0 1070 HIGH PT ELEV: 1052.26 PVI STA:63+59.25 c PVI STA:61+48.67 PVI ELEV:1056.00 PVI ELEV:1049.97 y g K:40.00 co K:160.87 m w a d $ > ' 1060 mU 1060 > m m PROPOSED FINISH GRADE ____ •2.68� _ 1050 �— FIELD ADJUST GRADES TO 1050 ALLOW PROPER DRAINAGE EXISTING GRADE 1040 v 1040 1030 w ? 1030 w Q. 1020 0. 1020 �O N r0 mow ,y N m N O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O a 0 o g o oa oa o0 ro m O N V O N ry t7 N o N V V 0� N [V o� m N C 3oa yy� 1010 2 Ca 59+50 60+00 60+50 61+00 61+50 62+00 62+50 63+00 63+50 64+00 64+50 65+00 65+50 66+00 fib+ 'x DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I �Eas su, � CITY PROJECT NO. --- FINAL STREET PLANS FILE NO. Base SGF 1 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ DRAWN BY 2 3 4 _ 5 6 _. DLS _DLS DLS DLS DLS 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 _ CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S _A_DD_ED_RET_WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING — ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS -----_— ----- — SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY ATHRESATHRE-BERGOUISE INC. OF THE RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.` (/njJ�/ y ./ ��'1�' /" r,./L/ �^' w F� SATH RE —BE RGQU IST INC. M E D I NA, M I N N ESOTA DEERHILL PRESERVE P RDC 7282-010-200 DSG 1 g 26 CHECKED BY o ,,,, m c�FRs 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 y P`P�2 DLS DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 05/01/15 i PRIMARY / �' / / cT OD - - - T �nZ9 C At 0 ��� / A9 ?/ GF1042.0 wo BF 1034.3 P \ tK P'(IG \ \ \ \ GAP 55 E PRF3 GF 1035.5 302 110 I / , TF 1035.8yr�1R`ECTEDP '� I II I WO l� \ \\ \ BF 1027.8 �` 1 ♦�� \ \ \ \ 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 070 LVC:236.27' o 0 n LOW PT STA: 2+95.79 +o 0 LOW PTELEV: 1036.08 ro 1060 PVI STA:2+14.68 a a m w m r + o K:35.00 rn w a a Y o 050 PROPOSED FINISH GRADE _-- - ----- - ---- - 040 - 1.06% EXISTING GRADE 030 00 oa o0 0 o0 0 �o o o0 0 o o0 00 0°� o0 00 00 og o0 00 5+50 5+00 4+50 4+00 3+50 3+00 2+50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 -0+50 co ai a M w a PROPOSED FINISH GRADE LVC:46.46' LOW PT STA: 4+14.80 LOW PT ELEV: 1014.43 PVI STA:3+91.57 K:36.00 -2.29 AREA �'hFq" .dp lA, p'.I is. I, rURE — ' EE r \ll 103 ( o. �o'10 \ -2.00 0 0 0 a -1.00 - - L EXISTING GRADE 101 OC °ND N D O I� O d{ rzi; O N N 01 N y I� N r ry M m M 00 4 m V W0 a uj 6 <O 10 1� N W ,� m r O o M O O m ry o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 N 0 0 V 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 o a No o 0 0 0 0 6+50 6+00 5+50 5+00 4+50 4+00 3+50 3+00 2+50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 -0+50 DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY SATHRIIFYSATHRE-BERGQUIST,INC. OF THE RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. y r,./L/ �Eas ��' w stl' � F� SATH RE—BERGQUIST INC. CITY PROJECT NO. --- FINAL STREET PLANS M E D I NA, DEERHILL PRESERVE M I N N ESOTA P RDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 Base SGF 1 2 _ 3 4 _ 5 6 DLS DLS _DLS DLS DLS DLS 02-12-2016 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S A_DD_ED_RET_WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING - ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS DRAWN BY L26 DSG CHECKED BY o ,,,, m m c�FRs 5 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 y `°� P`P�2 DLS DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 05/01/15 4 I W � 2}0 99 .52) 300' I 1 k 0 POWER POLE GRADE 1010.0 PROP. GRADE 1011.5i- TEX. ADJUST GRADES AS NEEDED 6 ` EDGE OF BIT "Jh/ i svLane (99*18 t (997.9) 2 G IShldr aryl (1EO1B7) EOB (1Ep 4)1010.0 (1007.9 (10104) I I EDB EOB D 172 Q d D d. D D D a D a Q 'R 4- D 4 D- Q 1. 4 D 4 D 4 D 4 D 4 D 4 4 D - 180, a DGE GRAVEII 4 SHOULDER 4 (1012.5) (1014.1) (1015.3) (1016.4 EDB EOB EDE EOe) TURN LANE _ 5 TAPER STRII - -- 1995.2t m C I` C-(NCSAH NO. 201, PLAT 5j�_ s / Z O >Q> Z W ZO I F I W W� a W Z io 'x DRAWING NAME Base SGF DRAWN BY DSG CHECKED BY DLS DATE 0.5/01/15 TURN LANE DIMENSION PLAN STREET CENTERLINE AS TRAVELED VARIES 1 2 12' 12' 12' 2' VARIES z_ TURN LANE J 4v/ 2% 1 2% 4 % LL - O -77 3:1 � 3:1 = EXISTING GROUND FINISHED GROUND MNDOT WEAR MNDOTBASE MNDOT 3138 CLASS 5 3" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE - MN/DOT MVWEB5035B (2360 SPECIFICATION) 3" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE - MN/DOT MVNWB5035B (2360 SPECIFICATION) 12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, MN/DOT 313W 18" SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL, MN/DOT 3149.213* GEOFABRIC, MN/DOT TYPE V, MIRAFI 50OX APPROVED SUBGRADE z 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET �- 99 2 / 402 - d 1z Yf Y7�1,Y Y YV Y �Y 4� Vd D a D a b� m rn LLH 1 (99 .e UJ •A �,� ,� _ I 4 DA Q D�\ d1 D� 4 D ❑/ LLI % d �o° o a D a 9 Q U)/ � Li i/ o�� �o� a 6� I. W zN /v � 1 ' GRRPEEm1y. V aO7..09 EE PROP. GP AIDE o11s✓ \ A�UST f RADE 0A115 EEDE%/ Le e i ;;� E /E9 �Oq*�`cJsPo.2 " 4 , 8 9 6$°E (1E08 ('80B ).� TURN LAND l _ 5TAPER STRIPE.. 5A I �C-(HCSAH 0. '201, AT 5C f 9 z� 1 1 I I I ) )I I A S� o \ a w' $ o o I ( 1 l I I Q F \ \ j� GRADING PLAN SEE GRADING PLAN FOR GRADING NOTES STREET NOTES 1. STRIPPNG AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY HENNEPIN COUNTY AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO HOMESTEAD TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR NOTIFY RESIDENTS ALONG THE LENGTH OF HOMESTEAD TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS AT ALL TIMES. PAVEMENT SECTION NOTES 1. THE PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION" AND ALSO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNERS SOIL ENGINEER. 2. ALL THICKNESSES, AS SPECIFIED, ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM DEPTHS, AFTER COMPACTION. 3. MNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE BITUMINOUS LIFTS AND AGAINST ABUTTING EDGES. 4. RECYCLED BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE MIX WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. IO. BY I DATE I REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS CITY PROJECT NO. FILE NO. 1 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IEEas SpR� --- TURN LANE PLAN 2 DLS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE ��' F� 7282-010-200 3 _DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. w SATHRE—BERGQUIST INC. INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. 1 MEDINA, DEERHILL PRESERVE 21 4 _ DLS 03-31-2016 ADDED _RET_WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING o 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE m y 5 OILS O4-19-2016 ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING m `vim M I N N ESOTA P RDC 26 6 DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. �4•FRs P`P�e _. --_--_ _ - - - - - - Date: 02/08/2016 Lic. No. 26147 4 4 $gP g�a rSA �I I -' YX -------- ------- - --- - -------- -- - ly § 1 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY.. THECONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINETHE IXACT LOCATION OFANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES.. 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET ---------- T I P B ilid In• C Iing DSAJ OUItrI�LR, DILI, z82.0' 6_0 9/ floral, iO lry IT y++ , ARM �2 ��M 9-111x IF III— _ - msxmx wax �xo w xw xm fxPfifx xWmrxw°" ffa fa Exo. m,rmxMx� x a �. x ° III —III III III= r_y ..I "° �" o"xm° �i Al 71111-11H11 III 000000°o°° ll I� III IIIIII: aF� .LL D wN Mlxo �xN I— w o o°o°o°o 0 fux oo 00000° smn axvanrx Tm Ivor wxn - sEc; rloN 0000000000 ce.wmoi®Eaua.o n�o m«xovx ,� 3 000 Tnimwcuo°j on rN' EU-vrwxamaT wve a:/yW a,wsruuo vx' °o °o eanv. s.xxmExavxEr sox. um.I xwv wlm xam o0 0°39� vfAre conaETEen 'D'"�>y�, MA sf`Q�`�NnwirorsEs auuaGs>EEVE T.Erofxwxmuvv immlma as — "`ram "�-r"raa"ro oo°oo w� xrexua xrxa a s,Evs unwxMx <oxEµ mcvuo lsmao mfe avuwMs.> Ea01 MPA0P�r.�rcoxx orixma xfr�w.u_ ( s":.� ..i,, sfTEv/nal..ncTnnox oexo� Anox oxxoo =.moo rota �ED� oom�E IIIIIIIII —III vax� axovmE3Axmoxa�roru,Ex o 1 ..... «�ffP ma`s xo�roxXx•mA Ir-u° vOx� rxAsx vwaoroxxmmo ` '' nEc h Qcnax xvrmfc.Lvua�urex *ru++�T �y '' u<•f xo� o' Iv - Tm rrAs�x�seTmvExr �'^T xaieE curarvrws�wml ronruunox .. omITeFv. wnolmnnv�xxaw voxoeormm " Irmoerus arwuL nxpgamm f1P°®mD' �� � a.s Txs omuatm xwfw PROFILE ZI.xx) o mlw ffxw oErm SEE ENKA MAT SOLUTIONS TECHNICAL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS iHAI sralT I EOnaxo ARE AVAILABLE IN THE BLACKSTONE RIDGE SPECIFICATIONS BOOK, IwrEmiC TRux� �Nx BOLS Pxl rerEcn4Ea Nmr� sa• BCYnPA53 }^ L _ NO'f 5/e' 1 xumta Mf• xRxe➢ &inE WNL I6 ma5warlC SHE GiERTMPN l9 Ono RFulKa¢wnx6 x 99' n � I/m•m Ix P@E LETAa sou TP. - eEV rHE�W SxMxEx Smucn�[ETUL4 N—T SZE nwT NroUm PREVEM 111E EN.— — I-- n rxE (nxooTs U,, s IEmTsx S' AwuwrE xeoi/fiErmmxm uowlrW xxa Mxomsxc. slasx noo.l xixartE, NI xnEmTI a PVC PERPoRATED PIPE Erv. SIGMMER STRUCNRE WITH 1 _j1l�t- - E eEIwEEn uxTs STORM SEWER MANHOLE FLARE. END SECTION AND TRASH GUARD � �'%� ..PAT OUTLETS][�'-" TYPICAL BENCH DEFAIL swI ec x 3 w rxc oixsrnory or rxc sinE mn ovxiwww. s� mcwcv SWALE INSTALLATION CONO2ETE BAHLE WALL MEDINA sro-ol MEDINA sT MEDINA sro-os MEDINA sroaB MEDINA sTo-I6 MEDINA sro-v xbA''� ENKAMAT EMERGENCY OVERFLOW r DETAIL ,71 IM 11/15 DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS CITY PROJECT NO. ..�.W......_.a�, FILE NO. Base SGF 1 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I �Eas su, DRAWN BY 2 DLS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE �F� FINAL STORM SEWER PLAN 7282-010-200 DSG 3 _DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.` (/njJ�/ w , SATHRE-BE RGQU IST INC. +� INDEMN_ YSATHRE-BERGOUISE INC. OF THE RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY. y ./ MEDINA, DEERHILL PRESERVE LZ CHECKED BY 4 _ DLS 03-31-2016 A_DD_ED_BET_WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING r,./L/ 0 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE m "" y DLS 5 DLS O4-19-2016 ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING m `off M I N N ESOTA P RDC 26 DATE 6 DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. c�FRs P`P�2 _. --_--_ — 05/01/15 _---- — Date: 02/082016 Lic. No. 26147 W W IY 0 80) - oo �� z, �� `\ N ° ��`,`\ / /' ZLL WSW 3 iP / o Do _ W \ \ (99' 40l) 00 b N� W m \ \\\ \ _ \ \ / U)oco- / ' \/ pry mm (9 0 I Z Q m oo p, N� v \ \ \ \ / / Z �� o s VVVV F� 6� U `� / / A6 ❑¢ 033 0- 2 0 IJ FE ° V v z S A4� (99 52) z l I ) I wz l pay. / POs7' wLI \ / A7 FUTURE) w fi �� I / O• 9 .39) Al 01 o (995.25), m 1050 1050 BMH A H A10 TC:1037.3 BLD. 11.3' FUTURE STORM 034.3 TDA: DIA:4 . 1040 : 5.8' --- _48.0" 1040 --- 1030 1030 104.T-18"RCP C.1018.8 CL.5 @ 2.24 % BLD: 5.3' uoi voi m o DIA: 48.0" 0 0 booms A71020 oos1020 z z 3 226.2'-18"RCP �� f.LD 11.4' CL5 @ 6.44%� 4 . to m ---- 1010 - 1010 234.9'-18"RCP ?? CL.5@6.51% 1000 1000 5 21" APRON TC: 983.9 11 CY CL.3 990 BLD:3.9' RIP -RAP 0 m m DIA: 48.0" z_ z_ 233.1'-18"RCP CL5 @ 7.46% 980 980 17.1'-27"RCP CL5 @ 0.29% �o 0 970 G > G 970 zZ_ Z 960 -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 960 8+50 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1000 1000 990 ff.LD4 990 MRIPRAP 980 980 27.6'-18"RCP o CL5@1.81% 970 c6 970 > z z 960 960 950 950 -0+50 0+00 1+00 OUTLET STRUCTURE-A4 - POND 5 TOP BACK-983.0 1, HWL-982.8 TOP NT 982.0 -982.0 TOP OF WIER-981.0 _ NWL-980.0 18'-RCP-978.5 N 1.5 x 5' INLET - IN 977.0 0.RD. BOTTOM-976.0 4,0' TOP WEIR-981.0 6" 18"-RCP NWL-980.0 OUTLET 1.5' x 5' INLET - INV-977.0 -ow 1020 1010 1020 1010 CENTERLINE OF DEER 1000 _ HILL ROAD 3+15 1000 / 990 3.1 SLOPE 3:1 SLOPE 990 ED ULDER RETAINING WALL - TOP OF WALL 984.0 _ BOULDER RETAINING WALL TOP OF WALL .2.0 BOTTOM OF WPLL 980.0 ( 1 BOTNM OF WALL 978.0 1 980 - 980 21"APR 8.5 121 L.F. OF 21 21"APRON-979.3 R.C.P. AT 0.66% 970 970 DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST,INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USEWITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT Ik0as AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. �� ��' w sUR� 6� SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. ' CITY PROJECT NO. --- FINAL STORM SEWER PLAN MEDINA, DEERHILL PRESERVE M I N N ESOTA P RDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 Base SGF 1 2 3 4 _5 6 DES DES DIES DES DES DES 02-12-2016 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING - ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS -----_------- DRAWN BY L26 DSG CHECKED BY o ,,,, m m c�FRs 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 y `�� P`P�2 DES DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/082016 Lic. No. 26147 OS/01/15 POND 4 FILTRATION NWL 987.0 BASIN 4 HWL 989.E ZI � BOT -986.0 HWL - 988.5 \ / 9 vd2 \ � \� A16sue_ ER ELEVATE ROAD / V STATION 4+30 T0�V- 0 p0. ROAD TO DRAIN THE NORTH � A15 1N-Po' - 25�0 �v i% Al y990.2Y- - - - - x 989.50x 1902 x x 912 x$903x- A11 a12 A14 �sR=�S� - WETLAND A ENKA MAT REINFORCE(Manage 1 ) EOF -SEE DETAIL 1010 1010 1000 FE A71 18" APRON TC 10 CY CL.3 L9414 48.0" 11"APCON 1C 3 2� RIP-RAP 1000 990 - -�, -- -- 990 68.2'-18"RCP 218.6-21"RCP CL.5@0.25% CL.5@0.15% 980 m " M mm 80 -z zz � N � 970 -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 970 3+00 Alignment - (SGF Storm) - (29) 1000 - 1000 PRON A15 ERIP-RAP TC: 987.1 CL.3 BLD: 7.0' 990 DIA: 48. 990 50.1'-18"RCP 980 L.5 @ 1.011r 980 970 � -0+50 J 970 1+00 1000 1000 S A16 15FEA " PRON FIES A17 9 CY CL.3 15" APRON RIP -RAP 9 CY CL.3 RIP -RAP 990 990 31.7'-15'RCP CL.5 @ 3.16 980 0 0 980 rn rn Z Z 970 970 960 960 -0+50 0+00 1+00 OUTLET STRUCTURE -A15 -POND 4 TOP BACK-990.0 1, HWL-989.7 TO8.0 7A 10.50'1�4NI N - LET ......18"-RCP-984.0. 4' DRAINTILE INV.984.0 BOTTOM-983.0 6.0' TOP WEIR -988.0 12"- 18"-RCP NWL-987.0 OUTLET 1.5' x S INLET INV-984.0 0.50 E. F9 \ STOM GRADE BERM / .913.0. - / -0+-00 - - - - - - - - - (INFINITY) WETLAND EI�u \,� Wti,�r�i OUTLET / ELEV-1051.0 (0.3 AC) --- S o o6. ol as �1 fu E� I-u116 zo oy i� oF� NORTH xaz ow - 50 25 0 25 50 100 az� SCALE IN FEET -z z 3oa y� wwQ zz 2- DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF THE RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I�Eas AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. y r,./L/ w SORB I SATH RE-BERGQUIST, INC. CITY PROJECT NO. Base SGF 1 2 3 4 _ 5 6 _. DLS DLS _DLS DLS DLS DLS 02-12-2016 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 03-31-2016 O4-19-2016 05-02-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S ADDED RET WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING - ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION CITY REVISIONS -----_- ----- - ___ DRAWN BY M E D I NA, M I N N E SOTA DSG CHECKED BY 0 m �4•FRS 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 `�� P`P�2 DLS DATE Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. Date: 02/082016 Lic. No. 26147 OS/01/15 / �K WETLAND OUTLET TO DRY CREEK - 1317 TOP BACK-1053.5 1, TOP FRONT HWL-1052.7 -1052.5 TOP OF WIER-1052.8 NWL-1051.0 18'-RCP-1050.8 rn 1.5'x5'INLET INV 1048.0 1.0' 0.50, BOTTOM-WIT0 4.0' TOP WEIR-1052.8 6 18"-RCP NWL-1051.0 OUTLET - 1.5'x 5'INLET INV-1048.0 W FINAL STORM SEWER PLAN DEERHILL PRESERVE PRDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 24 X26 4 1040 1040 12" APRON8 CY CL.3 M RIP -RAP 1030 1030 48.0'-12"RCP CL.5 @ 1.04% 1020 g --- 1020 1010 o zz _...- - 1010 1000 1000 -0+50 0+00 1+00 �y o6. o S ol as �1 lu Eg I-u116 zo oy oF� ow- 3 �,F az� -z z NORTH 3 ° n 50 25 0 25 50 100 y� E E a SCALE IN FEET zz 'x FUTURE MEDIAN \ \\�� 11 \ ti� 0 r TO 20- IAFT IAE TO BE DRAFTED AFTER B4 ( 6� 1 CONSTRUCTION _- I �220 `B3 7b� B6 I � � 7p3is3 \ 1040 1040 �12"APRONCY CL.3 12"APRON 1030 IP RAP 8 CY CL.3 1030 RIP -RAP 27.6'-12"RCP CL.5 @ 5.44% 1020 0 1020 _ o _o Z lV �! � 1010 1010 0+00 1+00 -0+50 \1 a\l 'ORATIVE DITCH SING BY OTHERS B7 00 1 26) F 1030 1030 21"APRON 10 CY CL.3 21"APRON RIP -RAP 10 CY CL.3 RIP -RAP 1020 1020 27.0'-21 "RCP 1010 c CL.5 @ 5.86 n a 1010 _ z _ z 1000 ZN 1000 9901 990 -0+50 0+00 1+00 FILTRATION - - BASIN #2 _ BOT 1010.0 ZZ 00 ''1 1 BUFFERAVE. ADDED-1300 HWL 1012.3 SF j�1� i I L--------/� PO D2-- e6tt0l - -'"NWL 1008.0 - - 0 +b9 HWL 1010.5 OSB15 Bt6 WETLANI oa, .E I: 0't, .BUFFER AVE REMbVEO 1650 SF (Preserve) OS B9 w B10 ENKA MAT REINFORCED c� EOF - SEE DETAIL z99tot - 1,.1 Ac 0T99 B13 � e o0 612 - r14 ---_----- � � BUFFER AVe. - 1030 1030 15"APRON 9 CY CL.3 :"APRON fRIP-PRAP 1020 1020 1010 28.0'-15"RCP CL.5@3.57% 0 y o 1010 1000 990 ? o z_ > 41 - ? 1000 990 -0+50 0+00 1+00 INFILTRATION BASIN #2 OS B9 TOP BACK-1011.5 HWL-10%8 1 TOPFRONT 4"DRAINTILE -INV 1008.5 21"- RCP -1008.5 1.0, 0.50' 1 BOTTOM-1007.5 4.0' 21"-RCP OUTLET O 0.50' 1030 1030 12'. APRON 8 CY CL.3 2.. APRON RIP -RAP 8 CY CL.3 1020 RIP -RAP 1020 1010III27H-12"RCP 1010 c CL.5 @ 3.59% 0 1000 M z N ? (V 1000 990 990 -0+50 0+00 1+00 OUTLET STRUCTURE - B15 -POND 2 TOP BACK -1011. 1, TOPFRONT AWL-1010.7 --1010.0 TOP OF WIER-1009.0 NWL-1008.0 07RCP-10N4"DRAI NLET � TILE - N NV100Q18"- 7.5 .5 1..0. NVx00510 ' 050' BOTTOM-1004D 4.0' TOP WEIR-1009.0 8' 18"-RCP NWL-1008.0 OUTLET 1.5' x 5' INLET INV-1005.0 0.50' 1030 1030 1020 ®RIPRAP 1020 1010 1010 92.6'-15"RCP CL.5 @ 0.54% 1000 0 .1 0 1000 > z z 990 990 -0+50 0+00 1+00 1+50 1030 FES B16 1030 1020 18" APRON 1020 TC: 1011.0 10 CY CL.3 BLD: 7.0' RIP -RAP DIA:48.0" 1010 1010 88.9'-18"RCP CL.5 @ 0.56% 1000 1000 z 990 990 980 980 -0+50 0+00 1+00 1+50 DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS CITY PROJECT NO. FILE NO. Base SGF 1 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ _ INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I FINAL STORM SEWER PLAN 7282-010-200 DRAWN BY 2 DLS 03-11-2016 CITY REVISIONS SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ��' w F� SATHRE-BE RGQU IST INC. DSG 3 _DLS 03-29-2016 REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S INDEMNIFYSATHRE-BERCOUISERVE OF RESPONSIBILITY. y ' MEDINA, DEERHILL PRESERVE 25 CHECKED BY 4 _ DLS 03-31-2016 _A_DD_ED_RET_WALL AT WETLAND CROSSING - THE RIGHT SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE 0 m "" y 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 DLS 5 DLS O4-19-2016 ADDED WETLAND CROSSING CROSS SECTION USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING r,./L/ m �4•FRS `�� M I N N ESOTA P RDC 26 DATE 6 _. DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS -----_------- FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. P`P�2 OS/01/15 Date: 02/082016 Lic. No. 26147 4 o6. o S ol as �_u116 �a oFUow- � 3 �,F x�z a_ �arc� a3� �Dw 3oa wy�wQ zz 2 DRAWING NAME Base SGF DRAWN BY DSG CHECKED BY DLS DATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1) I I I I I I I III I I I A �I moo $ F1 p MASS GRADE I LL LL / m --J / fx II I FILTRATON BASIN #1 �J�y1Cg1� I �I NI I 50 IIBOT992.0 I HWL 995.3 I I� /- 9�9/5.7x 0 I II FOREBAYIW1IPOND C11 1 WLN993.0 II 995.3 � C4 � - --- -- / MASS GRADE C3 CORRECTED PAD 170' � / � 2 MASS GRADE / WETLAN 7655 SQ OY DYE DECORATIVE BRIDGE onccinin ow nT��o \ \ \ 1020 FES Cl 1020 18" APRON RH:.:2CL.3P-RAP1010 MH C3 1010 TC: 999.4 - --- --- ___ BLD: 4.1' FE 4 ----- -- --_- DIA:4.0" 21"APRON --- '- _ 11 CY CL.3 0 65.2'-18"RCP 1000 CL.5 @ z20% c - - - ----- 1000 209.6'-18"RCP z o CL.5 @ 2.77% > z 150.6'-21"RCP 990 z z o CL.s @ 1.49% 990 - , wN � mm N zZ rn 980 _ z 980 970 970 -0+50 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+50 1010 FES C9 1010 18" APRON 18" APRON 10 CY CL.3 10 CY CL.3 RIP -RAP 1000 1000 990 25 8'-18"R P 990 CL. 5 @-1. 4% 0 980 N I m z ? - 980 970 970 -0+50 0+00 1+00 NORTH 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1010 OS C10 1010 TC: 997.0 ES�.N SLID: 8.0' A1000 DIA: 48.0" Y �9c 1000 990 -- -- 990 75.0'-15"RCP 0o CL.5@0.67% 980 m S > rn 980 Z n z 9701 970 -0+50 0+00 1+00 1+50 JO. BY I DATE I REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I EEas SORB 1 DLS 02-12-2016 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS_ 2 3 DLS 03-11-2016 03-29-2016 _ CITY REVISIONS REVISED ALIGNMENT TO AVOID P.P.'S SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. w I SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 4 _DLS DLS 03-31-2016 AT WETLAND CROSSING INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. p A 0 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 _ 5 DLS O4-19-2016 _A_DD_DWED_RET_WALLETLANDCROSSING C ADDEROSS SECTION SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING r,L/ m m y w� Daniel L Schmidt, P.E. v 6 DLS 05-02-2016 CITY REVISIONS FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. �4•FRa P`P�2 Date: 02/08M2016 Lic. No. 26147 OUTLET STRUCTURE - C10-POND 1 TOP BACK-996.0 TOPFRO1, HWL-995.3 -9950NT 995. TOP OF WIER-994.0 NWL-993.0 - '"�.=' INV 99'INLET INV 990.0 rl \1 15'-RCP-990.0 1.0' 4"DRAINTILE 0.50' INV 990.0 BOTTOM-989.0 4o' TOP WEIR-994.0 4 IT -RCP NWL-993.0 OUTLET x 5' INLET INV-990.0 0.50' CITY PROJECT NO. FINAL STORM SEWER PLAN MEDINA, DEERHILL PRESERVE MINNESOTA PRDC FILE NO. 7282-010-200 26 26 4 Project: DEERHILL PRESERVE Prepared For: Susan Seeland Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date: June 14, 2016 # Description GRADING & EROSION CONTROL 1 Mobilization - Grading 2 Clearing and Grubbing 3 Remove Existing Buildings, Fence/Walls, Driveways, Decks, Etc. 4 Silt Fence - Before Construction 5 Silt Fence - After Grading 6 Silt Fence Repair and Cleaning 7 Common Excavation 8 Subcut Unsuitable Material in Structural Fill Areas(Measured) 9 Borrow from Pond Areas (Measured in Field) 10 Respread Topsoil 11 Trench Borrow (If Needed) 12 Erosion Control Blanket 13 Restoration Seed & Mulch 14 6" Diam 20' Long Bio-Rolls (As shown on plans) 15 Condition Soils for Dry Swales - Seeding by others 16 Condition Soils in Infiltration Basins 17 Backfill Street Construction ALTERNATIVE A 18 Alternative:Bioretention Soil Premix (65% MnDOT 3149.2J Sand & 35% 3890.213 Compost) - (2017) 19 Subcut After Site is Established Soils in Rain Gardens/Infiltration Bains Enineers Estimate Unit -------- -- -------- -- Quantity --------------- --------------- Unit Price ---------------- -- ---------------- -- Total Amount ------------------ -- ------------------ -- L.S. 1.00 $15,200.00 $15,200.00 L.S. 1.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 L.S. 1.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 L. F. 21,580.10 $1.45 $31,291.15 L. F. 1,360.54 $1.45 $1,972.78 L. F. 2,294.06 $2.00 $4,588.12 C.Y. 70,000.00 $2.10 $147,000.00 C.Y. 15,000.00 $1.60 $24,000.00 C.Y. 12,000.00 $1.80 $21,600.00 C.Y. 18,000.00 $0.75 $13,500.00 C.Y. 5,000.00 $0.50 $2,500.00 S.Y. 4,800.00 $1.10 $5,280.00 ACRES 25.00 $475.00 $11,875.00 Each 46.00 $60.00 $2,760.00 S.Y. 10,000.00 $2.00 $20,000.00 S.Y. 2,300.00 $1.10 $2,530.00 L. F. 12,800.00 $2.00 $25,600.00 ----------------- TOTAL ----------------- $317,097.05 TON 5,300.00 $20.00 $106,000.00 C.Y. 4,800.00 $1.50 $7,200.00 ----------------- ----------------- $113,200.00 Project: DEERHILL PRESERVE Prepared For: Susan Seeland Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date: June 14, 2016 # Description STORM SEWER 20 12" RCP 21 15" RCP 22 18" RCP 23 21" RCP 24 27" RCP 25 12" RCP APRON 26 15" RCP APRON 27 18" RCP APRON 28 21" RCP APRON 29 27" RCP APRON 30 Catch basin/Manhole (4' Dia) 31 Manhole Extra Depth 32 Outlet Structure 33 Furnish & Install Castings 34 Storm Sewer Inlet Protection 35 Rip Rap at Aprons 36 Televise 37 4" Draintile per City Detail Plate Sto-13 38 Draintile Cleanouts Enineers Estimate Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Amount L. F. 130.40 $25.20 $3,286.08 L. F. 768.40 $27.50 $21,131.00 L. F. 1,784.30 $28.30 $50,495.69 L. F. 333.10 $32.50 $10,825.75 L. F. 20.00 $80.00 $1,600.00 EACH 6.00 $975.00 $5,850.00 EACH 6.00 $1,030.00 $6,180.00 EACH 7.00 $1,105.00 $7,735.00 EACH 7.00 $1,250.00 $8,750.00 EACH 1.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 EACH 10.00 $1,785.00 $17,850.00 L. F. 10.00 $105.00 $1,050.00 EACH 6.00 $3,780.00 $22,680.00 EACH 10.00 $650.00 $6,500.00 EACH 3.00 $185.00 $555.00 C.Y. 266.00 $95.00 $25,270.00 L. F. 3,036.00 $2.10 $6,375.60 LF 740.00 $14.20 $10,508.00 EACH 16.00 $160.00 $2,560.00 ----------------- TOTAL ----------------- $213,702.12 Project: DEERHILL PRESERVE Prepared For: Susan Seeland Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date: June 14, 2016 # Description ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- STREET CONSTRUCTION 39 Completed as Part of 429 Project CONCRETE WORK 40 Completed as Part of 429 Project TRAIL CONSTRUCTION 41 Mobilization 42 Subgrade Preparation and Tolerancing 43 Additional Subcut and Place on Site for Soft Areas in Trail 44 Trails - Disc and Dry 45 Seed Trail with Low Mow Fescue TURN LANE 46 Completed as Part of 429 Project Enineers Estimate Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Amount L.S. 1.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 S.Y. 6,283.73 $1.25 $7,854.66 C.Y. 150.00 $10.00 $1,500.00 HOURLY 20.00 $150.00 $3,000.00 S.Y. 6,283.73 $1.00 $6,283.73 ----------------- TOTAL ----------------- $20,638.39 Grading and Erosion Control $317,097.05 Storm Sewer $213,702.12 Streets 429 Project Trails $20,638.39 Concrete Work 429 Project Turn Lane 429 Project ----------------- Total ----------------- $551,437.56 FEASIBILITY REPORT 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Project FOR THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA June 21, 2016 Prepared by: Sathre-Bergquist 150 Broadway Avenue S. Wayzata, MN 55391 Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN June 21, 2016 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 RE: Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Please find the attached feasibility report addressing the proposed Deerhill Road Extension Project improvements associated with the extension and construction of a new portion of Deerhill Road that will connect Homestead Trail with the terminus of existing Deerhill Road. I am available at your convenience to discuss this report, and please do not hesitate to contact me at 952- 476-6000 if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, Dan Schmidt, PE Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN 2 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Eln&'tKer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dan Schmidt, PE Date: June 21, 2016 Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN Lic. No. 26147 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................... 6 2.0 PROJECT SUMMARY .......................... .......................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Authorization.................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Scope.....................................................................................................................................7 2.1.3 Data Available......................................................................................................................7 2.1.4 Project Background............................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Existing Conditions....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Sanitary Sewer and Watermain............................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Drainage................................................................................................................................8 2.2.4 Private Utilities..................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Proposed Improvements............................................................................................. .............. 9 2.3.1 Roadway............................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Drainage...............................................................................................................................9 2.3.3 Sanitary Sewer and Watermain....................................................................................9 2.3.4 Easements............................................................................................................................ 9 2.3.5 Permits/Approvals .......................... 2.3.6 Construction Access/Staging..............................................................................................10 2.3.7 Public Involvement.............................................................................................................10 3.0 FINANCING...................................................................................................................................11 3.1 Opinion of Cost........................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Funding.......................................................................................................................................11 3.3 Preliminary Assessment Roll......................................................................................................11 4.0 PROPOSED SCHEDULE... ........................................................................................................... 12 5.0 FEASIBILITY, NECESSITY, AND COST EFFECTIVENESS...................................................12 6.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION..............................................................................13 Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN 4 Appendix A Figure 1 — Project Location Map Figure 2 — Typical Section Appendix B Opinion of Probable Cost Appendix C Preliminary Assessment Map Preliminary Assessment Roll Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Project ("Improvement Project") was initiated by owner petition in response to the Deerhill Preserve conservation design subdivision. The proposed subdivision contains 41 single family residential lots which would be provided access from the extension of Deerhill Road. The proposed Improvement Project will provide an east -west road connection through this area of the City and will provide adequate access to the proposed subdivision. The Improvement Project includes the extension of Deerhill Road, as well as a dedicated right -turn lane on Homestead Trail (CR-201) which will serve as the main entrance into the Deerhill Preserve subdivision. The Improvement Project includes the construction of the new public street constructed to specifications for a local rural section street, concrete curb at vegetated medians, and dedicated right -turn lane on Homestead Trail. The total estimated project cost for the 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Project is $957,625 which includes a 10% contingency, 10% indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and 5% financing costs. The Improvement Project is proposed to be funded solely through special assessments to the benefitting property owners. A petition and waiver agreement has been executed by the affected property owner. Since the property being assessed is owned solely by one owner, as outlined within Minnesota Statute 429, both the improvement and assessment hearings will be waived. The City Council will still be required to adopt the pertinent resolutions to order the Improvement Project and adopt the assessment roll at the appropriate times. The majority of the Improvement Project is proposed to be completed in 2016. The final wear course of asphalt may be completed in 2017, but could be extended into the 2018 construction season depending on scheduling of the Improvement Project, weather, and/or the bids received. The final wear course will be bid as an alternate to obtain bituminous bids based on a 2017 or 2018 placement. The Improvement Project is feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint and should be constructed as proposed herein. Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN 2.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 2.1 Introduction 2.1.1 Authorization On June 21, 2016, the Medina City Council authorized the preparation of an Engineering Feasibility Report for the Deerhill Road Extension Project. 2.1.2 Scope This report investigates the feasibility of proposed improvements to extend and construct a new portion of Deerhill Road. Herein, the term "Improvement Project" will refer to the public portion of the project to be funded by assessments and administered by the City of Medina. There are other portions of the subdivision improvements that will be funded and administered by the Developer separately; some of these improvements may occur concurrently with the Improvement Project. The proposed improvement was considered in connection with the recently approved Deerhill Preserve subdivision which will be developed with 41 single-family rural residential lots. The proposed improvements extend from the terminus of existing Deerhill Road (east) to Homestead Trail (west) a total of 6,400 lineal feet. Approximately 700 lineal feet of the roadway is located in the City of Orono, but is proposed to be constructed as part of this Improvement Project and will be the responsibility of Medina to maintain in the future. The proposed Improvement Project includes a new roadway to be constructed to local street specifications including new drive lanes, shoulders, construction of concrete curb around road medians, a new dedicated right -turn lane from Homestead Trail, and a culvert crossing at the Homestead Trail entrance. Figure l in Appendix A illustrates the extents of the roadway throughout the Improvement Project. 2.1.3 Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following: ■ City of Medina Utility Record Plans ■ Field verified GIS Lidar Topography ■ Private Utility Maps ■ Private Development Plans ■ City of Medina Assessment/Improvement Policy 2.1.4 Project Background Feasibility Report 7 Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN This Improvement Project was initiated by petition from the property owner in response to the proposed rural residential development known as Deerhill Preserve. The proposed subdivision includes the development of 41 single-family residential lots which are required to have access to an adequate road. In addition to the public street to serve the residential lots, Hennepin County has determined, and required, that the number of trips generated by the new subdivision warrants the construction of a dedicated right -turn lane on Homestead Trail (CR-201) to access the subdivision on Deerhill Road. 2.2 Existing Conditions 2.2.1 Surface Generally, the project site is currently in agricultural production and there is no existing roadway located within the Improvement Project proposed right-of-way. There is an existing graveled segment of Deerhill Road with a small turn -around located at the eastern edge of the project area. This portion of Deerhill Road which extends east of the project area will not be improved as part of the Improvement Project. Homestead Trail (CR-201) is located on the western extents of the project area and is currently paved with bituminous. Soil borings and preliminary geotechnical review have been conducted at various locations along the proposed Improvement Project alignment. The soil borings encountered 1 to 2'/z feet of topsoil underlain by native clayey glacial till soils, which was fairly consistent across all of the collected borings. It is our opinion that these soils are suitable for construction of the roadway. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings. A more detailed analysis of the soils is available in the report from HGTS project number 14-894 dated January 26, 2015. 2.2.2 Sanitary Sewer and Water main There is no sanitary sewer or water main located within the extents of the Improvement Project. 2.2.3 Drainage There is no storm sewer within the extents of the Improvement Project limits. The surface waters currently drain naturally across the site, and the project area is generally agricultural in nature. 2.2.4 Private Utilities Private utilities will be requested to coordinate any necessary repairs, relocations, installations and replacements as needed at their cost, or at the cost of the Developer at Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN installation. Private utility companies that have facilities within the project area include the following: • Great River Energy (Electric) ■ Xcel Energy (Electric) • Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association (Electric) 2.3 Proposed Improvements 2.3.1 Roadway The Improvement Project includes construction of approximately 6,400 linear feet of roadway. The roadway will be constructed to the local rural street section standards including 24-feet of traveled paved surface , 3-foot shoulders on each side of the roadway, 1 '/2 inches of bituminous wearing course, 2 inches of bituminous base course, and 10 inches of class 5 aggregate base. There are two vegetated medians that will be constructed within the roadway and each will be edged with concrete curb. Deerhill Construction Plans, Figure 2 in Appendix A illustrates the proposed street section. The Developer of the Deerhill Preserve subdivision will be responsible for the planting of the vegetation within the vegetated medians, final vegetative cover within the righ- of-way areas, mass grading of the site and roadway areas, final grading of the adjacent ditches, and construction of the stormwater ponds and treatment areas. The Improvement Project portion of the project will require temporary transitional vegetative cove or surface stabilization to meet pertinent NPDES permitting requirements. 2.3.2 Drainage In association with the roadway construction a network of ditches, storm sewer pipring, swales and stormwater treatment basins will be constructed to accommodate the impervious surface area of the roadway. These improvements will be constructed by the Developer, and will be completed in coordination with the Improvement Project. The scope of the Improvement Project will include temporary erosion and sediment control measures as required to protect portions of the project outside of the construction limits. 2.3.3 Sanitary Sewer and Water main There are no sanitary sewer or water main improvements proposed as part of this Improvement Project. All lots within the Deerhill Preserve subdivision will be served with private well and individual septic systems. 2.3.4 Easements Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN It is anticipated that work will take place within the right-of-way or within the drainage and utility easements dedicated as part of the Deerhill Preserve plat. Temporary construction access on the Deerhill Preserve property may be necessary to allow for temporary turn -around locations. Further discussion with the Developer of Deerhill Preserve subdivision will occur during final design. Written permission or waiver of trespass agreements will be secured from private property owners for these encroachments if necessary. 2.3.5 Permits/Approvals The anticipated level of surface disturbance during construction will be approximately 25 acres and therefore an NPDES permit will be required. The increase in impervious surface will be approximately 9 acres which will trigger the City's storm water treatment requirements that includes permitting. The Developer of Deerhill Preserve has prepared a full set of storm water calculations and concurrent report which was reviewed as part of the platting process and can be used to obtain any remaining required permits. 2.3.6 Construction Access/Staging Since the Improvement Project involves the development of a new roadway, there are no existing areas for staging. The selected contractor will be expected to access the site from Homestead Trail and to provide for adequate staging areas entirely on the project site. The City will work with the Contractor and Developer to identify appropriate staging areas. It will then be the responsibility of the Contractor to properly sign the staging areas and to keep the construction traffic off of the existing graveled segment of Deerhill Road. 2.3.7 Public Involvement At this time no further public involvement is scheduled. The Deerhill Preserve subdivision, which included this Improvement Project, was reviewed and considered at a duly noticed public hearing and considered by the City Council. The only affected party is the owner of Deerhill Preserve. Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN 10 3.0 FINANCING 3.1 Opinion of Cost Details regarding the opinion of cost for the Improvement Project can be found in Appendix B of this report. The opinions of cost incorporate estimated 2016 construction costs and include a 10% construction contingency factor. Indirect costs are projected to be 10% indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and 5% for financing costs. The total Improvement Project cost inclusive of the proposed street improvements is $957,625. 3.2 Funding Financing for the 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Project will be provided solely through special assessments to benefiting properties. 3.3 Preliminary Assessment Roll Assessments will be levied to the benefitting properties as outlined in Minnesota Statute 429 and the City's Assessment Policy. Special assessments to benefitting properties are proposed to fund 100% of the Improvement Project cost. A petition and waiver agreement has been executed with the Owner/Developer that holds all interest in each of the benefitting properties (four parcels with separate property identification numbers). Once the Plat of the subdivision of Deerhill Preserve is recorded, the benefitting properties will be the 41 created lots, and each lot will be assessed at 1/415` of the project costs to be paid as the Owner/Developer transfers the title to the new lot owner. Each lot will ultimately receive its share, but the reapportionment may take a number of years to fully occur due to the timeline of the full development build -out. One of the conditions of the petition and waiver agreement is that the notice of both the improvement and assessment hearings is waived. The proposed assessment roll and a summary of the proposed assessment calculations are included in Appendix C of this report, along with an Assessment Map ID highlighting the benefitting properties. Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN 11 4.0 PROPOSED SCHEDULE The proposed project schedule for the 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Project is as follows: Activity Date City Council Receives Feasibility Study, Orders Project, Ap2rove Plans and Specifications/Authorize Ad for Bids June 21, 2016 Open Bids/Compute Assessments July 14, 2016 City Council Receives Bids and Declare Costs/Set Assessment Hearin July 19, 2016 City Council Awards Construction Contract July 19, 2016 Begin Construction July/August, 2016 Final Completion (wear course installation year to be determined based on Alternate selection) 2017 or 2018 City Council Declares Costs September/October, 2016 City Council Adopts Assessment Roll October, 2016 5.0 FEASIBILITY, NECESSITY, AND COST EFFECTIVENESS The proposed Improvement Project in this study is necessary to provide access to the Deerhill Preserve subdivision and accommodate the anticipated increase in vehicular traffic and turning movements. The addition and construction of the turn lane on Homestead Trail is a requirement of Hennepin County in order to grant an access permit for the new roadway. The new roadway will provide adequate access to the properties and the construction of the turn lane ensures an adequate means of transportation for the residents in this immediate area. Based on the information contained within this report, the Improvement Project as described can be considered to be necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering perspective. Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN 12 6.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Project includes the construction and extension of a Deerhill Road, a new turn lane on Homestead Trail, and concrete curb at vegetative medians. The total estimate cost for the 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Project is $957,625. Proposed funding for the Improvement Project will be provided solely through special assessments. A petition and waiver agreement has been executed with the sole owner of all affected properties. This Improvement Project is feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint. The Improvement Project feasibility is subject to financial review by the City. Based on the information contained in this document, it is recommended to proceed with the improvements as outline in this report. Feasibility Report 13 Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN APPENDIX A Figure 1 — Project Location Map Figure 2 — Typical Section Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN ------------------------- -------------------- h- I g=p I I I VICINITY MAP �s Q4 0 m - _ 200 100 0 100 200 400 SCALE IN FEET , Nl I I _ XS(jjjZ))>Z)>�>XXXXX _ V -_-_-_-_-_-_ — __HOMESTEAD THA—_--------__ 1 1 III SITE MAP DRAWING NAME NO. BY I DATE I REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF CITY PROJECT NO. �+ /� FILE NO. Base SGF 1 DLS 02-12-201 REV. PONDS AND INFILTRATION BASINS INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT eERs sb�'i, -- SITE MAP s- 7282-010-200 DRAWN DSG BY 2 DLS 03-11-201 CITY REVISIONS_ _ _ SAID AUT ER IZATIO, ICON EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT - . - SATH ��_������ ST SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY m2 - w CHECKED BY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. 0 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAVZATA, MN. 55891 (952)476-6000 MEDINA, D E E R H I L L PRESERVE FIGURE SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE m DLS USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING m w '�� M I N N E SOTA P R D C — -- --- --------------- DATE FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. �'I'FRS 05/01/15 3 N 25' ** 15' ** 12' 4" SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW PLUS 2" AT TIME OF WEAR COURSE A:1 ROW DEER HILL ROAD 30' CUL DE SACS 25' N WIDTHS GRAVEL BITUMINOUS 15' 12' 14' 11' 30' 25' ** 15' ** 12' ** 2' MIN. -6" CROWN (0.02% MIN) 4' DITCH BOTTOM L 1 1/2" - SPWEB240B WEAR COURSE 2"-SPNWB230B BASE COURSE 10"-CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED LIMEROCK OR RECYCLED AGG. (MNDOT 3138.) SUBGRADE STABILIZATION FABRIC - 8 OZ./SY NON -WOVEN COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE AS CONDITIONS REQUIRE LOW VOUME BITUMINOUS STREET (L R 15' TO BACK D-428 MOUNTABI CONCRETE CURB 30' 15' TO BACK 6" CROWN (0.02% MIN) 1/4" / FOOT 1/2 . 1 4" PERFORATED DRAINTILE DRAINTILE IN FILTER SOCK BEDDED IN PEE ROCK 1 1/2" - SPWEB240B WEAR COURSE 2"- SPNWB203B BASE COURSE 10"-CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED LIMEROCK, OR RECYCLED AGG. (MNDOT 3138.) SUBGRADE STABILIZATION FABRIC - 8 OZ./SY NON -WOVEN COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE AS CONDITIONS REQUIRE NOTE: LOW VOLUME BITUMINOUS STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 1. ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH THE ROADWAY. 2. DRAINTILE SHALL BE INSTALLED BEHIND CURB AT LOW POINTS, 50' IN EACH DIRECTION.DRAINTILE TO BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY DRAIN ALL LOW AREAS. DEER HILL ROAD LOW VOLUME RURAL AND URBAN STREET TYPICAL SECTION SBI JOB NO. 7282-010 FIGURE U APPENDIX B Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN Project: DEERHILL PRESERVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Engineers Estimate Prepared For: City of Medina Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date:June 21, 2016 # Description ---------------------------------------------------- Unit ---------- -- Quantity ------------------------------- Unit Price -- ------------------ Total ---------------------------------------------------- STREET CONSTRUCTION ---------- -- ------------------------------- -- ------------------ 1 Mobilization L.S. 1.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 2 Remove Bituminous Pavement SY 100.00 $6.00 $600.00 3 Saw -cut Bituminous Pavement LF 50.00 $5.00 $250.00 4 Subgrade Preparation RDSTA 64.00 $250.00 $16,000.00 5 Subgrade Excavation (EV) C.Y. 500.00 $10.00 $5,000.00 6 Select Granular Borrow C.Y. 500.00 $16.00 $8,000.00 7 Streets - Disc and Dry HOURLY 40.00 $150.00 $6,000.00 8 Conduit Crossings for Minor Utilities(materials provided by others) L.F. 600.00 $3.50 $2,100.00 9 Geofabric (MnDOT Type V MIRAFI 500X) S.Y. 20,000.00 $2.00 $40,000.00 10 10" Class 5 Aggregate Base TONS 13,000.00 $14.00 $182,000.00 11 2.5" - SPNWB330B Bituminous Base Course TONS 2,700.00 $55.00 $148,500.00 12 Alt #1 -1.5" - SPWEB340E Bituminous Wear Course Fall 2017 TONS 1,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 13 Alt #2 - 1.5" - SPWEB340E Bituminous Wear Course Fall 2018 TONS 1,700.00 $80.00 $136,000.00 14 Tack Coat GALS 1,000.00 $6.00 $6,000.00 15 Adjust Casting - Base Course EACH 1.00 $600.00 $600.00 16 Adjust Casting - Wear Course EACH 1.00 $600.00 $600.00 17 Traffic Control L.S. 1.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 18 Sign Panels Type C S.F. 18.00 $45.00 $810.00 19 Sign Post Supports EACH 6.00 $300.00 $1,800.00 20 Street Signs EACH 6.00 $400.00 $2,400.00 21 Topsoil Borrow C.Y. 650.00 $22.00 $14,300.00 22 Seeding SY 8,500.00 $2.50 $21,250.00 23 Seed Mixture 25-121 LB 10.00 $100.00 $1,000.00 24 Temporary Rock Construction Entrance EACH 2.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 25 Filter Log Type Wood Fiber Bioroll LF 2,000.00 $3.00 $6,000.00 26 Water (Dust Control) MGAL 80.00 $40.00 $3,200.00 27 Street Sweeper (with Pickup Broom) Hours 20.00 $200.00 $4,000.00 Project: DEERHILL PRESERVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Engineers Estimate Prepared For: City of Medina Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date:June 21, 2016 # Description -------------------------------------------------------------- Unit -- Quantity ------------------------------- Unit Price -- ------------------ Total 28 -------------------------------------------------------------- Mobilization for Concrete Work -- Each ------------------------------- 1.00 -- ------------------ $550.00 $550.00 29 D412 Curb and Gutter - Islands L.F. 584.00 $30.00 $17,520.00 ----------------- Streets TOTAL ----------------- $664,480.00 TURN LANE 1 Mobilization L.S. 1.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 2 Turning Lane / By -Pass Lane Grading - Mass Grading to Leave 10:1 C.Y. 300.00 $15.00 $4,500.00 3 Traffic Control L.S. 1.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 4 Subgrade Preparation RDSTA 5.00 $250.00 $1,250.00 5 Subgrade Excavation (EV) C.Y. 175.00 $10.00 $1,750.00 6 Granular Borrow C.Y. 175.00 $14.00 $2,450.00 7 Geofabric (MnDOT Type V MIRAFI 500X) S.Y. 700.00 $2.00 $1,400.00 8 18" Select Granular TONS 1,250.00 $16.00 $20,000.00 9 12" Class 5 Aggregate Base MNDOT 3138 TONS 830.00 $14.00 $11,620.00 10 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURS MIX (3,B) TONS 140.00 $70.00 $9,800.00 11 TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEAR COURS MIX (3,B) TONS 140.00 $70.00 $9,800.00 12 2' Wide 6" Gravel Shoulder TONS 81 $22.00 $1,782.00 3 Saw -cut Bituminous Pavement LF 500.00 $5.00 $2,500.00 13 Mill Existing Pavement SY 480.00 $4.00 $1,920.00 14 Tack Coat GALS 40.00 $6.00 $240.00 15 4" Solid White Line Latex L.F. 800.00 $4.00 $3,200.00 16 Sign Panels Type C S.F. 12.00 $45.00 $540.00 17 Sign Post Supports EACH 4.00 $300.00 $1,200.00 18 Street Signs EACH 4.00 $400.00 $1,600.00 19 Topsoil Borrow C.Y. 30.00 $25.00 $750.00 20 Seeding SY 500.00 $4.00 $2,000.00 21 Seed Mixture 25-121 LB 10.00 $100.00 $1,000.00 Project: DEERHILL PRESERVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Prepared For: City of Medina Prepared By: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date:June 21, 2016 # Description ---------------------------------------------------- Unit ---------- -- 22 Erosion Control Blanket Cat 3 SY 23 Temporary Rock Construction Entrance EACH 24 Filter Log Type Wood Fiber Bioroll LF 25 Regrading Boulevard and Ditch LF 26 Water (Dust Control) MGAL 27 Street Sweeper (with Pickup Broom) Hours Quantity 700.00 1.00 500.00 600.00 40.00 10.00 Turn Lane Street Total Turn Lane Total Total - Construction Contingency (10%) Overhead (10%) Financing (5%) Engineers Estimate Unit Price Total $2.00 $1,400.00 $1,000.00 $3.00 $8.00 $40.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $4,800.00 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 ----------------- ----------------- $101,602.00 $664,480.00 $101,602.00 ---------------- ---------------- $766,100.00 $76,610.00 $76,610.00 $38,305.00 Grand Total - Project Cost $957,625.00 APPENDIX C Preliminary Assessment Map Preliminary Assessment Roll Feasibility Report Deerhill Road Extension Project City of Medina, MN Deer Hill Road Extension Project Assessment Map City of Medina, MN Prepared by: Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date: 4/22/2016 Feet 300 600 1,200 1,800 Preliminary Assessment Roll - Deer Hill Road Extension Project Project Location: City of Medina and Orono Total Project Cost: $957,625 Map ID PID FEE OWNER FEE OWNER ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP CODE PROPERTY ADDRESS 1 2811823310001 Stone ate Farm, Inc. 6851 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 2940 Sixth Avenue, N, Orono, MN 55356 2 2811823240001 Stone ate Farm, Inc. 6852 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Unaddressed 3 2111823340003 Stone ate Farm, Inc. 6853 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Unaddressed 4 2111823340002 iStonegate Farm, Inc. 6854 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Unaddressed 5 2111823310001 Stone ate Farm, Inc. 6855 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Unaddressed KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Stonegate Farm, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, to wit: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. �I The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota except that part thereof which lies Westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees, 07 minutes, 42 seconds West along the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 925.33 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 45 degrees, 52 minutes, 18 seconds East, a distance of 115.25 feet; thence South 11 degrees 56 minutes, 18 seconds East, a distance of 53.92 feet; thence Southwesterly to a point in the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, distant 1140.18 feet Southerly of the Northwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and said line there ending. And That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South along the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 668.33 feet; thence West parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 548.47 feet to the Easterly line of Dillman Road; thence Northwesterly deflecting to the right 41 degrees, 13 minutes, 16 seconds along Easterly line of said Road, a distance of 60.15 feet; thence Northerly 239.14 feet along the Easterly line of said Road being a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 254.35 feet; thence Northerly 249.7 feet along easterly line of said Road, being tangent to last described curve; thence Northerly 166.62 feet along the Easterly line of said Road to the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; said 166.62 feet being along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 650.97 feet; thence East along North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 655.43 feet to the point of beginning. And, the abstract portion described as; That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West along the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1140.18 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence South 49 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 57.15 feet; thence South 29 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West to the northeasterly right of way line of Hennepin County Highway No. 201, Plat 53; thence southeasterly along said right of way line to the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds East along said east line to the point of beginning. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as DEERHILL PRESERVE and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the public way and the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Stonegate Farm, Inc., a Minnesota corporation has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 2016. Stonegate Farm, Inc., a Minnesota corporation Vice President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016, by , Vice President of Stonegate Farm, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name I, David B. Pemberton do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 2016. David B. Pemberton, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 40344 DEERHILL PRESERVE STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota My Commission Expires: MEDINA, MINNESOTA day of 2016, by David B. Pemberton. Notary Printed Name SECTION BREAKDOWN SECTION 21 AND 28, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23 NOT TO SCALE NORIB O Denotes a 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe set in the ground and marked by License No. 40344 • Denotes a Found Iron Monument Q Denotes a Hennepin County Cast -Iron -Monument _ WEST 1/4 CORNER OF \ SEC.21, T.118, R.23 (HENNEPIN CO. C.I.M.) \� �\A T � - 1328.86 I This plat of DEERHILL PRESERVE was approved and accepted by the City Council of Medina, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this day of , 2016. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. By: , Mayor Bob Mitchell City Administrator - Clerk Scott T. Johnson RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that taxes payable in and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this .2016. Mark V. Chapin, Hennepin County Auditor By: , Deputy SURVEY DIVISION HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this Chris F. Mavis, Hennepin County Surveyor By: REGISTRAR OF TITLES HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that the within plat of DEERHILL PRESERVE was filed in this office this at o'clock M. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By: Deputy COUNTY RECORDER HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that the within plat of DEERHILL PRESERVE was recorded in this office this 2016, at o'clock M. Martin McCormick, County Recorder By: , Deputy \A/ -1 / VV I / day of • / I NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SEC.21, T.118, R.23 LO HENNEPIN CO C I M co ( ) N / NORTH LINE OF N ( —THE SW 1/4 0 SEC.21, T.118, R.23 z S88052'47"E 2657.73 4 I I N 0 N 00 --,,� �F-: 1328.86 — o i ii \ ' S88 52 47 E 2656.81 — I I EAST 1/4 CORNER OF _ �I SEC.21, T.118, R.23 (HENNEPIN CO. C.I.M.) Q N INSET A N w w- SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS w �Lj_ 00 �o o N Ld z -I 3: N w w Ln 3 ~ O I o n J J v'< r- L_ 00 ~ o ~ v� N w N z n 1 w :3 C) �t w o N / — MATCH LINE A — NORTHWEST 1/4 CORNER OF SOUTH LINE OF _ --SEC.28, T.118, R.23 THE SW 1/4 / (HENNEPIN CO. C.I.M.) SEC.21, T.118, R.23 I I � — I �/ day of 2016. \ j N890I2'38"W \ 2644.50 1322. /• - "cc*R HILL RDDUEER HILL RD 25 - �/ \� - 1322.25 I I I I EAST LINE OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4—� SEC.28, T.118, R.23 day of , 2016, day of I- jlNE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 SEC.28, T.118, R.23 [CU9� rn N I\A/ 1 / A o 4J Ip 1 N J 0 N ^\A/ VV INSET B SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS N I F— -1 / A I N L_ I / `t o � NORTH LINE OF00 v� —THE SW 1/4 OF o — MATCH LINE B— -" THE NW 1/4 N n 1/ SEC.28, T.118, R.23 \� S89002'39"E / 2628.12�� 1314.06 1314.06 � I r7 I ®/ "DEER HILL. RD' I I \ NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF — SEC.28, T.118, R.23 (FND. HENNEPIN CO. C.I.M.) 06 to M � N z of w Z:00 o ~ coo N w00 z J 0 I N �� \ Cn _ \ w o r _ o I I (D V) / 0 INSET C \ I / A O 1. SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS rA A (0UR1 M WEST 1/4 CORNER OF — SEC.28, T.118, R.23 I I// (FND. HENNEPIN CO. \ / _ 2" C.I.P.) 1305.88 _ \ /1305.88 I I N88052'32"W 2611.77 n �- ��� 1 N MI5 \ 3:: F- LO FRS SU �i) N The basis for the bearing system is the north line of the L> M can SAT H R E- B E R G Q U I S T INC. Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 N., A �� o Range 23 W., and is assumed to bear ^ A =C N w � North 88 degrees 52 minutes 47 seconds West. J cJ 1 i i A v r SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF— _ FRS P 01� SEC.28, T.118, R.23 \yl, (HENNEPIN CO. C.I.M.) II�JJ EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SEC.28, T.118, R.23 _ (FND. HENNEPIN CO. C.I.M.) N88°52'3211W 2616.21 SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS 00 to o d m wZ xZpTw � N QUJ0 N N U JW W �auj ocr 6 M Z W N WC9�W it� 0 ao a 0 < cy w Z N J ~ 00 N Q owofo zcnmw I l� c0 00 op N to 0 r- It N LO 0 00 00 Z M d- 06 00 00 JLM PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 92.06 154\92 t l Lo rn(51 \ \ 1 M �\ 1 0')I D RHI PRESERV R.T. DOC. NO. EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC.21, TWPA18, C.R. DOC. NO. RGE.23 PER H.C. SECTION BREAKDOWN ALSO THE EAST LINE - - - - - - SOO'24' I3"W 2631.18 - - - - - - - - OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 1443.54 62.93 27.14 s� s378.65 77 \ ° 997.85 I in �-� a / ' �\ °ccWET LAND I 014- J.r-, INSET A 114V �00 Z Ln <"P �s8� YFq N00'24 14 E 9>A 527. ---__ 158.39 s 6so, !� � \ Q c0 I 0 �O 7O•LU � w I N Z \ I WET LANDAnt,co / / \ O(n1 (�os�) �V W `\ \ 0 J co Of Li OUTL / /13 IV rn SA E1 077 Ln In\ ,�v \ ✓ ,,� Sl3°27'26 ao �� �`ti o^ \\ \\ w \° I � O 45• 11 0 % ���" / �� ° 05„ � / / \ \ 2305 / / / Sto 30 0/ 2 /21/ EN68o/(9 l2�3404.53 0 ll'3W 02.50 O o`L) \ 0I S80040135 E V Xv44,p / / / WET LAND WET LAND o \ ° 00 P \ o c0 cP. N M \25t °2 \ o� F' \ ✓ \ I 0 N06°43'23' 9 N 2� 266 E 156.72 i (10 �6 N �\ 48 II EDGE OF WET LAND I 8 4/ E o /5� NO3°17'08"W C �� N69 �j' ! S00° 12'56"W 316_61 �_ - _53 64.76 N\ I Pi 30 � . _ II�o 1 0 �i , „ Y-01 C14 I W 509'35609 E 9\\ S08°11'43"w 20 - 0) I\ m Lo W ---�� 72 6 Dc610 ��-DRAIN AGE AND U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T-----_5.54 00 N �O Z �. DRAINAGE AND 0) I F-+ -� UTILITY EASEMENT I O I --I i / �- - N00°12'12"W 314.51 1 Y \ � 0 �� b h N1 / � - -� 6 0 \ � N08°26'12 "E 200 29 5p �g $9 26 UTLOT1 41 62. ,.N C - S .. � W \ i ° 02' 34 W _ 408.54 I 10N10,,'5 v w ��' ° "106.21 56 "E 439.92 NO2°35'- \ / 1 \ <\ N o/ �� 5 N01 18 22 E 13 NO2°37'00"E 199.29 OD �! W I _ ('0 o �2 Ce Ce Q v\0I ooJ �\ Zo 0° �° jl I - DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: / NIS° o N �� 3� ' I Being 5 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, unless otherwise 0 N ( \ 9 06"E I \ \ � �I _3 w w - ` indicated, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines, I J / m � � 0 N LO o �� \ unless otherwise indicated, as shown on the plat. I I w 00 \ �„ ^ �rn Zwowo oSRo° I6" !n /� = o w / - ►�C1q w o ^ �0 0 2i2\s\ o ' co z 12.10 0)dZ S66 (no °s<i /oWET LAND w OUTLOT orc \ \ e \ V I 1 N11°p6'36„W g6. �� // 04 `Ss9 /O a�20 30, \ 00 I \ � L-Li 00 o Z J - d� �9g �.3'l \ O Denotes a 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe set in the I \ \ \ 1 6� \ o`Lo �' ^ �/ �%O o O \ C) Ap /� S i ground and marked by License No. 40344 Ito Ld a 01I, A: oo G No N 0 I 1- ', S m �\� 15 6� 15\ \,\ \� , // 6 o I • Denotes a Found Iron Monument C� 0�., n �� 21 \ \ I d� �g M / 1 N69° I / \ N� p6,�sr6, 1\ D \08 J I L" Sp 3 3000 2 W ® Denotes a Hennepin County Cast -Iron -Monument II �0% N� Z RSR 6O�, c9 R=120.0 $�� /) R- ��\\?� -PV% 00 3 225. �Po _h 36 2 00 �\ c / ��o S6 0 "E 76.21 / �/0=22°22'09"1 1 5��06`0�` �00% 00, ,6 6 OS 16 87 0 O 6' 0 I - / The basis for the bearing system is the north line of the Op,p)I \ S2� 02 / 84 ��g22� 0 00 �', 6,,, �; / Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 N., 9 \ - R� I / Range 23 W., and is assumed to bear S00017' 31"W 560.67 `3� S�05o �o North 88 degrees 52 minutes 47 seconds West. WET LAND 0 \ �29.51 1853.09OUTLOT E4�,5roo,,> 732.86 3? 52.96 - - 1191.32 WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER I OF SEC.21, TWP.118, RGE.23 PER H.C. SECTION BREAKDOWN ALSO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 ,'1��RS ° SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. U 0 w co N CtiF 4� Rg pL - - - - S00015' 42"W 2638.91 - - - - CURVE AND LINE TABLE TAG # LENGTH DELTA RADIUS BEARING/ CHORD BEARING CHORD DISTANCE C1 37.80 A=72'11'53" 30.00 N77'01'37"E 35.35 C2 41.29 A 23'39'29" 100.00 S55'02'42"E 41.00 L1 38.90 S30°57'00"E L2 37.83 N62°31'22"E 80 40 0 40 80 160 SCALE IN FEET SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: D RHI PRESERV - _EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC.21, TWP.118, n C-r-'-) NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC.28, TWP.118, RGE.23 PER H.C. SECTION BREAKDOWN ALSO THE EAST LINE V L_ L_ �\ - / - SEC.28, T.118, R.23 I ---RGE.23 PER H.C. SECTION BREAKDOWN ALSO THE EAST LINE I OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 I III 1 I_) n 33 /L (HENNEPIN CO. C.I.M.) I OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 i ---- - - - - r1 I L_L_ I \ V---- \ oNo �I �aa•�i bIy.LU 34.8 . 11A4I 0- .0 0 W� 09, LO �M C14 0INr- I�20382OUTLOT C U) Iz WET LAND 4 V 59.71 I 401 i40 \ Ln WET LAND � ,,ya N00024' 14"E 339.74 I B• S f t• •d l d d 1 t l• 1 h CY) \ ``' N `ti - - I s 1107.55 -WET LAND - \ /\- - WET LAND I - - `SS,, - -DRAINAGE AND FUTILITY EASEMENT-=--�� \�� -�-� WET LAND \� I \-�-yl---------� OF I o \ \ \ WET LAND- S/901 a> CO \ 323.97 S07°43'00"�y S09°43,241' S R \ ` �2 \ /S8• / I00 10) emg ee m wi t 1 an a jommg o mes, un ess of erwlse v) , pc pp 25.34 % I - Z °8 A �� \fig 6 00 indicated, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines cr) • O w �/ '� O� o " _ 40 40 36.88 10 J g g Y � , � O• D� 0 3 32 29 � � _ 1 / 4_ ° 10 � %� ti`� unless otherwise indicated, as shown on the plat. \ o N6S° 3 A �� \� ro' 0Cn /� _ _ I {' 4 18 46" N s�� �� S00046'57"E 152.52 1 / - - - - 34 0� E co \� Off. v / I h I N o S09 45'39 "W �2 _� 5b(b w \ 4'48 !� ON O� OQ / / �� V 5.92 J 10 I z 2 C) INSET B . R� I ,O,5,, 1 OUTLOT \I °, 211 C4 \, �4°V'2 I \ \ 206.62 _ LO O N o eD z \ 59.55 �=6°57'48" N00030'32"E z o ` i �4 W Q \ 91.96 6 cS0351 \ \ J /I I : %K 0 I iI 26 S6113\/ N � �/ 61 9s " W149.46 o 1 � w N06°19'28\98� (0 v6� \ \ 10 0 ti rri ��8 o c \ WE \ / Ul `5 �v $ o \ `� �- 40 0 1 \ ��AND �'I s1 \ �� w N �`bo\�\� ro r`�° \ D� 00 / �'�� /'\h�g0 \\ \ I / \ -WET LAND-� Ln ��� / // O�,Zg `Id ,�\ `L 10, LA \ I CD // pi oo q` 30512 / �`\1�'1000, ���i+ III/1I�xv�p HWW \/\i \ /\ /\\ \/ \ o / \ \\l/ \ \-��\ - rnI\�/o \ ^\\ ��\,io5�00 \ \/\ ,o °ss\9� , o/6 ay o RFat�-�330°�0• � 98 ��8- I 0 � - ° 0M-NI oM � I �• <`1 sOior�'. O pR•cnom \ � w10,2s S8902221 0 \� Ln _0 709•90 0 00 0N00057'38"E 161.78 ° ;I 3 4jJ� AEDGE OF WET LA ND\ 161.78 14 NcoW7% . Of 0,7 �? ``�oo\�\\ 9 r Ln LU o tx � N"oOUTLOT J WET LAND/ 4 00 to 0) (0 L w 30 / � I 00 to � °° _ " d=R- \ % ??_?/ .°3/4�r,N �375 /6 30 S o 0 AD 0 )0I I 0=59°10'N 347•78 4,01 w - Lox A27o o 8°23'50 o ryo`4 ' o °� 0 W h o/4 ' 00� _ED a=45015'38 0o0/ Ck:oO ov WETab�p/,OUTLOT F 3I w ,- GE LAND \" z o co C? Cn 0WA`I\14�o I o° No` pM�`\o\o °3 LL._J XLLI 0No �\9I 2\.54Sg 90 =~ � ZOUTLOT G.=, 0% 3995 222.73 4M503224.07 'o70 _ 06'0 S034035E .00000 o5 os 6 R°°oA262.LO , CP 341 1 I o00 54� CC) %K� 0O0 20o 1x N 00 0 Lo 00 o toN d6 o_I/0S23j o 09411 OUTLOT H �oSZ 00 ,o /6 200j� 41 10,p�o R/ A-d,0one h0 s $68 /6408 /6333.5611 6161o^ - DEER HILL Ld 33 , + I 1 III 11W wVWzni 80 40 0 40 80 160 0=51 38 25 M 0 I Ln 00 o ooi 38 0 N N \ GJ 527. 90 W Q ►� ,ri SCALE IN FEET OUTLOT 4 w = c) 0)- olo 0 � / p 2 � cn � � ao / 1853.09 z 645.27 CURVE AND LINE TABLE TAG # LENGTH DELTA RADIUS BEARING/ CHORD BEARING CHORD DISTANCE C3 38.27 A 3*28'51" 630.00 S29'37'47"E 38.27 C4 14.63 A 1'44'48" 480.00 N68'43'22"W 14.63 C5 34.39 0 19'42'11 " 1 100.00 S68°17'55"E 34.22 ---- S00015'42"W 2638.91---- , - I I-=.3 --JLM PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER ��- L� OF SEC.21, TWP.118, RGE.23 PER H.C. SECTION BREAKDOWN - - LiJ - . <( ALSO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST LiJ =J 0 QUARTER PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 C] _LE (h I The basis for the bearing system is the north line of the O Denotes a 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe set in the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 N., ground and marked by License No. 40344 Range 23 W., and is assumed to bear North 88 degrees 52 minutes 47 seconds West. See sheet 2 of 4 sheets • Denotes a Found Iron Monument Q Denotes a Hennepin County Cast -Iron -Monument 1231.73 r - - - - S00013' 17"W 1334.90 - - - - / WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC.28, TWP.118, RGE.23 PER H.C. SECTION BREAKDOWN ALSO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS The basis for the bearing system is the north line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 N., Range 23 W., and is assumed to bear North 88 degrees 52 minutes 47 seconds West. See sheet 2 of 4 sheets O Denotes a 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe set in the ground and marked by License No. 40344 • Denotes a Found Iron Monument QDenotes a Found Cast -Iron -Monument (xxx) Bearings shown thus are per deed tiORI� 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET D RHILL PRESERVE INSET C MATCH LINE B / / 3 SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS \ EAST 349.90 I I I I Ngl 57 ,2911E 392.51 107.13 119.57 �'� r 1 0� I� 1 I /NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST O I N89044' 18"W 510.21 1 �� 67.68 SOUTH LINE OF THE I \\ �° - O 1 °\O \ \ , -NORTHEAST QUARTER / M \ I \ 66 I QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST - _ n 'd 4\13o 6S S i ' 1 �Op 00 ^ \ \ ( OF THE NORTHWEST - QUARTER OF SEC.28, TWP.118, RGE.23 O 2 QUARTER0 SEC.28, I PER H.C. SECTION BREAKDOWN I o M � � M S4 4g `� 1 O �` \\ 1\"�1WP.118, RGE.23 Z I Z / �o _ -..-. - . _ . � f.- ti-o y O \�:'Z' 0 OUTLOT K \ \ �� POWERLINE EASEMENT PER �T( �T` �/ ��- t�\ E N89°02'39"W 654.47 (n /�-�43.14 30 �� \ \�j,, %C.R. DOC. N0. 2891209 \ - j` ��\ 6203 on \ ° 96 ro POWERLINE EASEMENT PER p� 30 \�� 89 35 06°Erlll.5 �' �L - - - - NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE - � f_ �- _ _ _ �' .<v � \� � - pp M - - - - - - - � �\ � C.R. DOC. N0. 2891189 _ r \ .-� -� -- - __ o O r7 ap - 1 SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE I o -� �� /- - �\10 0 s9 _ �,��\ 00 00 • - / w S83° NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC.28 I \ S89 53 18 E 448.21 �\ \-P G� PN�N� - �, / I z� - - - NORTH LINE OF THE N O - _ 48 II 00 ° ° c0 0 . v N o � E 340.86 CO Z II W N a D� \ �� p\\,\P PSE� ro °� / �� / '� ` -SOUTHEAST QUARTER E \ > � w I \ 1 OF THE NORTHWEST i\ oo _WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER 4\ �v�\\\ i 5° �_ �l `" `fir' QUARTER OF SEC.28, d II U NQ o p 0 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, SEC.28, / �� �� / ,,� `'O Ov w � ov'\ y v� TWP.118, RGE.23 m o U T.118, R.23 PER H.C. SECTION BREAKDOWN 0� t�2 I I I _ \ z U Z o Z �n ALSO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST A / 2 \b P "' o 66 W 'n o N 180.23 �° o 2ti 2 QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 0) ,� \ ® C)Qci ? PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 o o �� N - o A ,� W �� N88 53 42 E 288.85 w I �L J o � rn f\ o / o h w N < "� n Ar-r\IN1 n / d w �\ �� \ o 3 NP, o Q can / rn IVI L_ LJ 1 1 N \ _ N `� Lp O \ 30 \ �'= ZI ` \I I �`� )N� IVIUI �1 141IKV�7:�i VL_ 10.CO-- Z rn I o \ a ^ I 1 N LJ �o o' '� o /� I `1� n r�r�ITInn1 zIC ^ 4/,R/ °` � rn / / N82°45 51°W N �"/� y, i-\ LJ LJ I I I \J 1 N ��oO r'� 4--39° 0 vi Co / 146.68/ Q o " 55'09 w ^'� -1 41 � � ° ° / , �O (0 6000 6 Qj° ^� Q 166 (n oN \�� J \ C� 40 9g 4 ��E � n I N 9� F /� J \ w q*oOUTLOT r v L ° 'd P1�(0okn011� o'X LO \\ N N ° %� EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST I o % < / NCB N jp• / QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST -- �, `�00 �= \C�\�/ �?� QUARTER, SEC.28, T.118, R.23 PER H.C. �� \'00 x \ OUTLOT I SECTION BREAKDOWN ALSO THE EAST \ V1 CA 1000 LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF fn / / �528,,� TORRENSNORTHWEST NO. 1 158 PER / O /� 41 *13'16" ® 2 „�O n ` h < / ° V co O 240.60 666 306.85 1� - O <� O FND. JLM PER v� �, 6 S89°02'39"E 547.45 ® TORRENS CASE NO. `Sstj° `�i�'. L Z n I 1 i - 0/ / 548.47 DEED 17158 \�% ' S2 \ S OUTLOT M _ / -LINE PARALLEL WITH NORTH LINE OF y \ F` \ \ FIND. JLM PER y �O � SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF NORTHWEST S � �3i � \\ TORRENS CASE St N0. 17158 19, QUARTER to Sj S2 W Lri � S� _ \� h� N rn m CP C_i °' 04 �To L, >. 4 / (/ � I O �� � � p\ Jj �°° A � / o Sip QOQ,, / , \ \��o �6gg \ 7 \ice so s n \ems `L ��7°O s0� O CURVE AND LINE TABLE TAG # LENGTH DELTA RADIUS BEARING/ CHORD BEARING CHORD DISTANCE C6 9.80 A=1 °44'55" 321.11 S33°43'09"E 9.80 C7 72.93 A=10`59'44" 380.00 S72°06'00"W 72.81 L6 53.92 S11 °50'43"E L7 182.06 S49`09'17"W L8 78.47 S34°35'36"E L9 71.63 S0`13'17"W L10 42.46 S88'52'32"E SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. Cy /AJ -� EAST LINE OF THE so tS ��'� i9 \ SS 0 v'� o � ��� SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF- X6,?�` FJ O �� ° S6\ \// THE NORTHWEST QUARTER �� R \ �' Of t� r \ \ w w/ON cs? - - � Ld d ' PONT IN THE WEST LINE OF N 00 �J \\ ��'' i / - -THE SE QUARTER OF THE N o_ \ 9J A- - NW QUARTER, 1140.18 FEET \Ibb\� / �� 5g SOUTH OF THE NW CORNER ��� '+ �� a cll� d 00 1 • v' FT A < / �; rr EASTERLY LINE OF / 65� �� \\ 6'a --1\ 0- ^) J H.C.H. NO. 201, - / fp CJ' u' p \ wFT \oi6 PLAT 53, PER C.R. � / G O cpE\ �qN� N0, 7� �j0b` / _6°43 14 -WET LAND DOC. NO. 4577820 �,, Q / J L I O - 7.42 i _ 32.84 S87° 17 00' W 502.62 ! - 278.60 \ 569.16 G�95.04 0 70.43�0 // DRAINAGE AND I 52.63< 528.79 UTILITY EASEMENT L\ EDGE OF WET LAN II / DRAINAGE AND _ - - ' _ _ S88°52'32"E 1305.88 HOMESTEAD TRAIL J UTILITY EASEMENT SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF JLM PER TORRENS K Ar-r\IN1 A IV L_ V I I Nr\ h A/\L)N IIN IVI�JI \1 N 11 N\7._;I UL_ M AA/1�>NIINI/�^If1r- IVI\/I \1 VII V\7"ILJL_ o LJ I \ I V L_ CD N W � N A r\ r\ I -r I /\ N I /-\LJL/I I I\JI N G� ) w O LI_ 00 w �z -D � Li CV _ J CU w Z �I=-LJ V' (YJ O 0 U QV) �Zw \ mow( /- ma- Z (If - J oLJ w � G" ) I=-U� =w <` 0�3 wwF_ z�� J pry O L d J N Z N�� (Y� - 3EC.28, TWP.118, RGE.23 PER H.C. SECTION \ CASE NO. 17158 BREAKDOWN SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 -JLM PER TORRENS I I I CASE NO. 17158 SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. Cy /AJ -� EAST LINE OF THE so tS ��'� i9 \ SS 0 v'� o � ��� SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF- X6,?�` FJ O �� ° S6\ \// THE NORTHWEST QUARTER �� R \ �' Of t� r \ \ w w/ON cs? - - � Ld d ' PONT IN THE WEST LINE OF N 00 �J \\ ��'' i / - -THE SE QUARTER OF THE N o_ \ 9J A- - NW QUARTER, 1140.18 FEET \Ibb\� / �� 5g SOUTH OF THE NW CORNER ��� '+ �� a cll� d 00 1 • v' FT A < / �; rr EASTERLY LINE OF / 65� �� \\ 6'a --1\ 0- ^) J H.C.H. NO. 201, - / fp CJ' u' p \ wFT \oi6 PLAT 53, PER C.R. � / G O cpE\ �qN� N0, 7� �j0b` / _6°43 14 -WET LAND DOC. NO. 4577820 �,, Q / J L I O - 7.42 i _ 32.84 S87° 17 00' W 502.62 ! - 278.60 \ 569.16 G�95.04 0 70.43�0 // DRAINAGE AND I 52.63< 528.79 UTILITY EASEMENT L\ EDGE OF WET LAN II / DRAINAGE AND _ - - ' _ _ S88°52'32"E 1305.88 HOMESTEAD TRAIL J UTILITY EASEMENT SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF JLM PER TORRENS K Ar-r\IN1 A IV L_ V I I Nr\ h A/\L)N IIN IVI�JI \1 N 11 N\7._;I UL_ M AA/1�>NIINI/�^If1r- IVI\/I \1 VII V\7"ILJL_ o LJ I \ I V L_ CD N W � N A r\ r\ I -r I /\ N I /-\LJL/I I I\JI N G� ) w O LI_ 00 w �z -D � Li CV _ J CU w Z �I=-LJ V' (YJ O 0 U QV) �Zw \ mow( /- ma- Z (If - J oLJ w � G" ) I=-U� =w <` 0�3 wwF_ z�� J pry O L d J N Z N�� (Y� - 3EC.28, TWP.118, RGE.23 PER H.C. SECTION \ CASE NO. 17158 BREAKDOWN SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER PER TORRENS CASE NO. 17158 -JLM PER TORRENS I I I CASE NO. 17158 SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE DEERHILL PRESERVE STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT TAX DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Background: Findings. 1.01. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 444.16 — 444.21 (the "Act") to establish a storm sewer improvement tax district in connection with the Deerhill Preserve subdivision (the "District") to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related facilities within the District and to acquire, construct, maintain and improve stormwater holding areas and ponds outside of the District which are for the benefit of the District in accordance with the Act and to levy a tax on all taxable property within the District to finance such activities. 1.02. It is found and determined that it is in the best interests of Medina and its storm water management program that the District be established. The District shall be comprised of the land legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section II. Establishment: Authorizations. 2.01. The Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District is hereby established. The City shall have all powers and authority conferred by the Act in the operation and financing of the activities of the District. 2.02. The boundaries of the District include all property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and are depicted in the map on Exhibit B, attached hereto. 2.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Auditor, Recorder, and Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County. Section III. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication and the recording of the plat of Deerhill Preserve in Hennepin County. Ordinance No. ### 1 DATE Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this day of , 2016. Jeff Pederson, Acting Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Published in the South Crow River News on this day of , Ordinance No. ### 2 DATE EXHIBIT A Legal Description of property contained within boundaries of Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Lots 1 through 4, Block 1; Lots I and 2, Block 2; Lots I through 4, Block 3; and OutlotsB, C,D,E,F, G,H,I,J,K,L,Mand N; Deerhill Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. Ordinance No. ### DATE EXHIBIT B Map of Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Ordinance No. ### 4 DATE Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-## RESOLUTION REGARDING THE 2016 DEERHILL ROAD EXTENSION PROJECT; ACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the Stonegate Farm, Inc. (the "Owner") has petitioned that the City construct certain improvements for the benefit of its property, including the construction of Deerhill Road from its current terminus 1/2 mile west of Willow Drive to Homestead Trail and a dedicated turn lane on Homestead Trail onto the newly constructed Deerhill Road ("the Project"); and WHEREAS, the Owner has indicated its intent to enter into an agreement with the City, acknowledging that the Project solely benefits its property and stating its willingness to waive rights to hearings and appeals; and WHEREAS, a report has been prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. containing information regarding whether the Project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate the individual assessments for affected parcels; and WHEREAS, the report was reviewed by the city council on June 21, 2016; and WHEREAS, plans and specifications have been prepared by Sathre-Bergquest, Inc. for the Project which have been reviewed by the city council on June 21, 2016; and WHEREAS, the estimated total cost of the improvement is $1,085,720, the cost of which will be fully assessed to the Owner as petitioned. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the city of Medina, as follows: 1. The Project as described above is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report received by the city council on June 21, 2016. 2. The Project is hereby ordered as proposed. 3. The plans and specifications for the Project reviewed by the City Council on June 21, 2016 are hereby approved. Resolution No. 2016-### June 21, 2016 4. The city administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisements shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be received by the clerk until 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, July 14, 2016, at which time they will be publically opened in the council chambers of the city hall by the administrator and engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at 7:00 p.m. on July 19, 2016, in the council chambers of the city hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during the consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the administrator for 5 percent of the amount of such bid. Dated: June 21, 2016. Jeff Pederson, Acting Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-## RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF THE DEERHILL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE WEST OF WILLOW DRIVE WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a T1iici orporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and ' WHEREAS, Stonegate Farm, Inc., owns property within the City in Sections 21 and 28, approximately one-half mile west of Willow Drive, which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and "g�Mfiu; 98,0888a, WHEREAS, Property Resources Development Corporation (the "Applicant") intends to purchase and develop the Property; and WHEREAS, the-uRQ .�QN and Applicant believe right-of-way exists through the Property for � a R Deerhill Road; andhh hh h WHEREAS, the Owner and Applicant have requested that the City vacate much of the Deerhill Road right-of-way within the Property because such right-of-way would bisect lots within the proposed development; and WHEREAS, the portion of the Deerhill Road right-of-way requested to vacated is legally described in Exhibit B, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 412.851, the City scheduled a public hearing to consider the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was posted, published in the official newspaper and mailed to the owners of affected properties, all in accordance with law; and WHEREAS, the City held the public hearing on the proposed vacation on April 5, 2016, at which hearing all interested parties were heard; and WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the City determined that, if such right-of-way exists, the vacation of the portion requested is in the public interest. Resolution No. 20164# DATE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota as follows: If such right-of-way actually exists, the City hereby declares that the portion of the Deerhill Road described in Exhibit B is vacated, subject to the condition described below being satisfied. 2. The city clerk or her designee is authorized and directed to prepare and present to the Hennepin County Auditor a notice that the City has completed these vacation proceedings and record with Hennepin County Registrar of Titles the vacation of the right-of-way described in Exhibit B only upon recording of the Deerhill Preserve plat. Dated: Jeff Pederson, Acting Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 20164# 2 DATE EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property The East Half of the Southwest Quartcr of Section 21, Township 118, Range 23, Hcnncpiu County, Mioncsote. And The: Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township I I N, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesom And The Southeast QuartcT of Iltc Northwest Quarter of Sc�fioa 28, Township I IFS, Ranyx 23, Hunnupin County, MinneyUla cxLcpl Thal Part Ihur,4y r which lies Westerly of the following descnLaed line: Commencing at the Northwest commr of Said ;SaautheaSL Qdurum of thL: Northwest Quarlcr; thence on an MUMed hearing Of Saytfth 0 degrees, 07 minutes, 42 Seurn[_s WoSI 91mg,, the wuag line of said 5uutheaSt QUartgr of the Northwest Q=TIUr, e li:3Lanct of 925,33 feet tr9 the actual point of beginning of Lhe line being described; Lhcncc South 45 degrees, 52 mimics. 18 seconds Fast, a distance or 115.25 feel; thence Soah 11 degrees 56 rn:mus, 19 seconds East, a distance of 53.92 feet, theru,e SUuthwe6tcrly to a point in the West line of said Southeast Quarler of the Northwest Q uatrLc=r, distant 1 140-18 feet Southerly of the Northwest t ornear of sand Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and said litre there ending. And That part I•,1,;: Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Townsh"p I R. Range 23, Hennepin County. Minnesota described as follows; R I at the ti -,F-•:1,1 ;,rncrof said Southwest Quarter of the Nortbwc.5; QL?a=Tz thence South along the East line of said Southw•csl Qtrttrttr of 1 e, I %vz.I L,lI I.i;lanct of 668.33 feet; thence West parallel with ih . North Brie of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a tis«l --I ! ! the Easterly line of Dillman Road: lhenc,`t NejTIhwcstc7rlv dullc:cling to the Tight 41 degrees, 13 m--nurus, 16 wconds along F..astcrly I-n a:Ii,: I'. : stince of 60.15 feel th Tier: NoTiherly 239.14 feet along the Easterly line of said Rcmd being a iangemid cxvc to the righlhaving a F-Wius ei I. '-hence NOT-1herlV =47:7 refit al;mg easterly line nr yaid Road, being langunt 14) Lt3l descrihed curve; lhLmce Northerly 166.62 feet alons' l l," I- I.•rk Imc of said Road to Lhc North line (IF said 90L1thwest QUaarter of the Northwest Qtuartcr; said 166.62 fctiL bring illrmg a tangenCial eWVe to the I. ,I% it g a radius of 650.97 fur[; thence Tact al,j,, NierLi 1_n[. of said 5oµthwest Quarter of the Northwesl QLrWer 655.43 feet to the paint ofbeginr,ing. And That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township I B, flange 23, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quartcn. thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrces 07 minutes 42 seconds West along the East line of said Soto "vst Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1140.18 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thcn+cc South 49 degrees 03 minutes 42 sceonds'4rdcst, a distance of 57.15 feet: thence youth 29 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds Wcst to the nanhcastcr1v rig;tt of way line of Hcmcpin County Highway No. 201., Plat 53; thence southeasterly along said right of way line to the cast line of said South west Quw to of the Northwest Quartet; theme North 00 degrees 07 runiutm 42 seconds East along said cast line to the point of bcgitming, Resolution No. 20164# DATE EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Right-of-way Vacated That part of Deer Hill Road described as follows: f3cguming at the North Quartw corner of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, thence on an asslARWd bearing of Sou1h 00 degites 34 minutes 25 seconds West along the, cast line; of the: Norhwest Quaner,of said Section 28 a distance of 1630 feel; thence North t 9 degrees 12 minutes )1 st~ nnrt West fsarailct wish the north line of the Northwest Onartcr of said Sceiion 28 a distance of 1 t66.40 fett; thence notthwrestertya d sbnc of 39.27 fe -t along amen taflgrntiaI curve concave to the northeast, having a radius 9f 6;0.00 fur, a Central angle of 3 degrtts 28 Thinutes 51 seconth and a chord [hat hears North 29 degreoS 37 minutes 47 Wctonds WrT.1; thence South 39 degrees 12 minutes 38 seconds Casi parallel wilh the north llice of the Northwest Quaner of said Section 28 a distance of I186.10 feet to east tine of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118. Range 23; th cnce South Ill} degrees 24 minute: 13 seconds West along said east fine ofthe Southwest Quarter, a distance of 16,50 feet w 1he point of beginning 8ne1 tnere t=inattnt;. Resolution No. 20164# DATE Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing the Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is four pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety: Public Notice The city council of the city of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing the Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District. This district will apply to property within the Deerhill Preserve residential neighborhood and would allow the City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain, and improve stormwater facilities within the neighborhood if the homeowners' association fails to do so and to levy such costs against the property in the neighborhood. The full text of Ordinance No. ### is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that the city clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 Dated: June 21, 2016. Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-## RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR "DEERHILL PRESERVE" WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Stonegate Farm, Inc. (the "Owner") owns approximately 170 acres of property in the City (the "Property") west of Deerhill Road and east of Homestead Trail which is legally described in Exhibit A; WHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution 2015-85, granting preliminary approval to Property Resources Development Corporation (the "Developer") for a conservation design planned unit development subdivision with 41 residential lots which placed approximately 90 acres into a permanent conservation easement; and WHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the City Council also adopted Ordinance No. 588, which approved the rezoning of the Property to a Conservation Design Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD) which regulates development of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Developer has made an application for final plat approval for the plat, the name of which has now been changed from "Stonegate" to "Deerhill Preserve"; and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to develop the Property in phases with the proposed first phase including 10 of the lots; and WHEREAS, Outlots D, G, H, J, L, and M are intended to be replatted in future phases to include the remaining 31 residential lots; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the final plat at the April 5, 2016 and June 21, 2016 meetings; and WHEREAS, upon review of the final plat the Council finds that, subject to certain terms and conditions, the plat is substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat and the terms and conditions thereof, the requirements of the City's subdivision regulations, and the requirements, terms and conditions of the PUD district. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants final plat approval for Deerhill Preserve, subject to the following terms and conditions: Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 1. The Developer shall install all improvements shown on the plans received by the City on May 3, 2016, except as modified herein. 2. The Developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall be in a form and of substance acceptable to the City and which shall include the conditions described in this approval as well as other requirements of City ordinance or policy. 3. The Developer shall provide to the City a letter of credit prior to any site construction in an amount recommended by the City Engineer to ensure completion of the required improvements, including all restoration of conservation areas. 4. Except as explicitly authorized by City resolution or ordinance, all aspects of this subdivision shall comply with all applicable state laws, city codes, ordinances and regulations. 5. The Developer shall submit Homeowner Association (HOA) documents for review and approval of the City. Such documents shall ensure maintenance of conservation areas, stormwater facilities, private roads, and other common elements. HOA documents shall also include enforcement provisions by which the HOA will ensure homeowners abide by management plans for subsurface sewage treatment systems. Such covenants shall require approval from the City to amend sections which are necessary to carry out the terms and conditions herein. 6. Street names shall be consistent with City street -naming practices (i.e. Fox Hill Court; Stags Ridge Court). 7. Shared driveways shall meet relevant standards and include a reciprocal easement and maintenance agreement satisfactory to the City, which shall be recorded against the properties. 8. Design of private roads shall be updated during the relevant phase of development in order to be acceptable to the City Engineer and Fire Marshal to ensure adequate circulation and emergency access. 9. The Developer shall grant trail easements in the locations shown on the plans received by the City on May 3, 2016, or as adjusted in the field with the approval of City staff. The conservation easement and land stewardship plan shall not prohibit the City from converting the trails to hard surface in the future. 10. The Developer shall deed Outlot A to the City for parks, trails, and open space purposes. In lieu of dedicating additional property, the Developer shall pay a park dedication fee -in -lieu of $178,636.42. 11. Construction traffic shall be restricted from the existing gravel portion of Deerhill Road and shall be permitted only upon those roads approved by city staff and specified in the development agreement. 12. Conservation easements shall be granted over all conservation areas at the time of recording of this plat and shall be in a form and of substance acceptable to the City. Restoration of conservation areas may occur in phases along with adjacent development rather than occurring all upon the first phase, provided adequate financial guarantees are provided for restoration of the future phases. 13. The Developer shall provide funds following establishment of the conservation area vegetation within each phase of the development in an amount sufficient to cover the maintenance and operation of the conservation area for three years following establishment. 14. The Developer shall comply with the terms and conditions of the plat opinion provided by the City Attorney Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 15. The Developer shall address all comments from the City Attorney, City Engineer, City Building Official and Hennepin County. 16. Up to 25% of the lots may have secondary septic drainfields in the Conservation Area if it can be established that there is no reasonable alternative to locate a secondary drainfield on a lot. The location of the secondary site within the Conservation Area shall be subject to approval by the easement holder, be compliant with all applicable city and state regulations, and be acceptable only if the installation of a septic system would not result in significant hardwood tree loss. 17. All wells within the City's Drinking Water Supply Management Area shall be registered to monitor possible contamination sites. 18. The Developer shall obtain a public right-of-way easement over adjacent property related to the proposed street construction within Orono. 19. Any agreement deemed necessary by the City Attorney between Orono and Medina related to the proposed street construction within Orono shall be obtained prior to the City's execution and recording of the plat, as shall any required permits from all relevant agencies. 20. The Developer shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the City of Orono, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Hennepin County, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and other relevant agencies. 21. The Developer shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the Planned Unit Development, final plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Dated: June 21, 2016. Attest: Clerk Un Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: (Recused:) Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Parcel 1: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota except that part thereof which lies Westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees, 07 minutes, 42 seconds West along the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 925.33 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 45 degrees, 52 minutes, 18 seconds East, a distance of 115.25 feet; thence South 11 degrees, 56 minutes, 18 seconds East, a distance of 53.92 feet; thence Southwesterly to a point in the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, distant 1140.18 feet Southerly of the Northwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and said line there ending. Parcel 4: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South along the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 668.33, thence West parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 548.47 feet to the Easterly line of Dillman Road; thence Northwesterly deflecting to the right 41 degrees, 13 minutes, 16 seconds along Easterly line of said Road, a distance of 60.15 feet; thence Northerly 239.14 feet along the Easterly line of said Road being a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 254.35 feet; thence Northerly 249.7 feet along Easterly line of said Road, being tangent to last described curve; thence Northerly 166.62 feet along the Easterly line of said Road to the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; said 166.62 feet being along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 650.97 feet; thence East along North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 655.43 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 6: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West along the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1140.18 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence South 49 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 57.15 feet; thence South 29 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West to the northeasterly right of way line of Hennepin County Highway No. 201, Plat 53; thence southeasterly along said right of way line to the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds East along said east line to the point of beginning. Resolution No. 20164# 4 June 21, 2016 Agenda Item # :9A::] MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 14, 2016 MEETING: June 21, 2016 City Council SUBJ: Excelsior Group LLC — PUD Concept Plan Review — 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road Review Deadline Complete Application Received: April 20, 2016 120-day Review Deadline: August 19, 2016 Summary of Request The Excelsior Group, LLC has requested review of a PUD Concept Plan for an 87-lot residential development north of Chippewa Road and west of Mohawk Drive. The subject site is a total of 37 acres (31 net acres), with two single family homes. Much of the property is pasture with some tilled farmland. There are wetlands in various locations on the properties. The subject site is guided for Low Density Residential development in the current Comprehensive Plan within the 2021-2025 staging period. The Comp Plan permits a property to develop up to two years early through a point system. The properties are zoned Rural Residential -Urban Reserve, which is an interim zoning designation for property until development occurs consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Property to the north and west is currently rural residential lots, planned for future low density development in the Comp Plan after 2021. Polaris is located to the southeast of the subject property and the Wealshire is under construction to the east. The property south of Chippewa Road is planned for future commercial development. An aerial of the site and surrounding property can be found at the top of the following page. The purpose of a PUD Concept Plan is to provide feedback to the applicant prior to a formal application. The Planning Commission and City Council will not take any action and the feedback is purely advisory. Comprehensive Plan As noted above, the subject properties are guided Low Density Residential (LDR) in the current Comp Plan, which would anticipate development with a net density of 2-3.5 units per acre. The properties were part of the Staging Plan amendment completed last year, which changed the properties from the 2016-2020 staging period to the 2021-2025 staging period. The amendment also reduced the amount of flexibility permitted for developing prior to the staging period. A residential development can occur two years prior to the staging period (rather than up to 5 years early). Excelsior Group Page 1 of 6 June 21, 2016 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting " Y. a. Y r set. 9 Fr- " The City is currently in the midst of its decennial Comprehensive Plan update. The Steering Committee has put together drafts of a Vision, Community Goals, and a draft Land Use map. This information is attached for reference. Because the update of the Comp Plan is underway and these properties would not be permitted to develop until after the new plan is expected to be effective, staff believes it is reasonable to consider this concept plan within the context of the draft Comprehensive Plan. The Vision and Community Goals speak to only expanding urban services as necessary to support the minimum forecasted growth. The subject property is not proposed for urban services within the draft Comp Plan update, even though it is planned for urban services in the current Plan. In order to support the goal of limiting expansion, the City may wish to discuss reducing growth in another location if expanding services to this site. Proposed Site Layout The applicant proposes a mix of 87 small single family lots. The applicant proposes 55-foot wide "villa" lots on the eastern property, which is located in the Rockford School District. The applicant proposes 65- and 75-foot wide single family lots on the western property, which is Excelsior Group Page 2 of 6 June 21, 2016 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting located in the Wayzata School District. The proposed net density is approximately 2.8 units/acre, which falls in the middle of the LDR density range. The R1 zoning district was created to implement the LDR land use. The RI district requires larger lots and setbacks than the applicant proposes within this development. Development of R1 lots would likely result in a density closer to the minimum LDR requirement of 2 units/acre. R1 Requirement Proposed 65' and 75' Lots Proposed 55' Lots Minimum Lot Size 11,000 s.f. 9,000 s.f. 6,500 s.f. Minimum Lot Width 90 feet 65 or 75 feet 55 feet Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Front Yard Setback (garage) 30 feet 30 feet 25 feet Side Yard Setback (combined) 25 feet (15 & 10) 15 feet (5 & 10) 15 feet (7.5 & 7.5) Side Yard (corner) 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 25 feet 20 feet Max. Hardcover 40% Staging Plan As noted above, the subject properties are not planned for development until after 2021. The Staging Plan permits a property to be considered for development two years early through a list of criteria which are described in the attached document. The flexibility in staging is accomplished through a Planned Unit Development (PUD) review. The information submitted by the applicant does not provide substantial detail on whether the criteria would be met. The crucial factor is whether sufficient infrastructure exists to develop existing and planned development in addition to the proposed project. In this case, the City Engineer is specifically interested whether the project could be served through existing gravity sewer service. In terms of other factors described in the Staging Plan Flexibility section, the proposed development is adjacent to existing development, which would achieve points. The site plan includes small areas of open space, a small park area, and trail connections which may warrant points. These factors would not provide sufficient points to justify Staging flexibility. The applicant would need to provide additional detail on remaining factors to determine the extent to which any are met. Even with the flexibility permitted in the Staging Plan, development would not be permitted until 2019. In the meantime, the City intends to adopt is decennial Comprehensive Plan update. As a result, development will likely be guided by the updated Comp Plan. Tree Preservation and Buffer Yards Few trees are located on the subject properties. Any application would be subject to the City's tree preservation and replacement requirements. Excelsior Group Page 3 of 6 June 21, 2016 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting Any development request would need to provide landscaped buffer yards to rural properties to the west and north. Wetlands and Floodplain The subject properties appear to contain four wetlands, which most of the wetland areas being in the southern portion of the site. The applicant proposes impacts to the southwestern wetland in order to construct a street to serve lots in this portion of the site. The concept plan identifies the City's minimum upland buffers around remaining wetland areas. FEMA maps identify no floodplains on the subject properties. Transportation The applicant proposes a single access point at Chippewa Road, located where the 2212 Chippewa driveway is today. If the applicant proceeds with a formal application, information should be provided to determine if improvements should be required for Chippewa Road. Mohawk Drive has limited right-in/right-out access to the east of the site. As a result, eastbound traffic would be required to go west on Chippewa Road to Willow Drive in order to turn left onto Highway 55. The concept plan shows two connections to property to the north and a connection to property to the west. If the surrounding property is guided as rural residential, these connections may not be advisable. Staff recommends reorienting the street layout depending on the planned land uses to the north and west. Sewer/Water If development were to occur at the subject site, sewer and water infrastructure would be required to be extended from Mohawk Drive to the property. The applicant would also be required to loop the water main to connect to the main north of the Wealshire project. The applicant should provide data sufficient to review whether the site can be served with gravity sewer lines. Staff would not support early development if a sewage lift station were necessary. Stormwater/LID Review/Grading Review The Concept Plan does not include full grading or stormwater plans. Any development proposal would ultimately be subject to relevant stormwater standards. Park Dedication The City's subdivision regulations requires up to 10% of the buildable property to be dedicated for park purposes. The City may also choose to accept cash in -lieu of all or a portion of this land dedication in an amount equal to 8% of the pre -developed market value, up to a maximum of $8,000 per home. Staff does not believe the fee would reach the maximum in this case, but it will be determined more precisely during the preliminary plat review if the applicant proceeds with a formal application. Excelsior Group Page 4 of 6 June 21, 2016 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting The concept plan identifies an approximately 3/4 acre park area including with a "tot lot" playground equipment. The concept plan also identifies trail connections through the neighborhood connecting to Chippewa Road and to Wealshire. If the applicant proceeds with a formal application, the connection to Wealshire, which is private property, would need to be discussed with the property owner. Purpose of Concept Plan Review/Review Criteria According to Section 827.33 of the City Code: "As the first step in the review procedure for a PUD, an applicant shall complete and submit... [a] Concept Plan..." "Comments and actions by the City during review of the Concept Plan are purely advisory and in no way shall bind the City to subsequent approval ... nor imply any future approval." The City has a great deal of discretion in the Planned Unit Development and in reviewing the requested Staging Plan flexibility. The Concept Plan process allows the developer to receive feedback in order to determine whether they will invest in the formal development proposal. The purpose of the PUD district is described below. A PUD should meet these objectives in order to be approved. "Section 827.25. PUD - Planned Unit Development Reiulations - Purpose. PUD - Planned Unit Development provisions are established to provide comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is intended to encourage: Subd. 1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. Subd. 2. Higher standards of site and building design. Subd. 3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. Subd. 4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low -impact development practices which result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of the City. Subd. 5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses. Subd. 6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and service facilities. Subd. 7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower development costs and public investments. Subd. 8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) Subd. 9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the City." Excelsior Group Page 5 of 6 June 21, 2016 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting As noted above, the properties are not planned for development until 2021. Development prior to this time would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment or Staging Plan flexibility to 2019. The criteria noted in the Flexibility section would also need to be achieved in order to allow for the development. Planning Commission/Staff Comments The Planning Commission and City Council should review and provide comments on the Concept Plan. Because the property is within the 2021 Staging timeframe, staff believes it makes sense to review the concept within the context of the Draft Comprehensive Plan update. Currently, the draft Plan identifies the properties to be removed from the MUSA and to be guided rural residential. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the concept at the June 14 meeting. Nearby property owners at the public hearing did not appear to oppose the concept, but urged the Planning Commission that their properties should be guided for immediate development if this proposal is to move forward. Planning Commissioners believed that the proposed lot sizes were smaller than they ought to be if a development proceeds forward. Commissioners believed that the property should be considered within the broader context of the Comp Plan update, rather than being developed early. Numerous Commissioners stated that the applicant did not appear to meet the PUD criteria or the Staging Plan flexibility criteria. If the applicant proceeds with a formal application, staff has provided comments throughout the report, which are summarized below: 1) Any future application shall be subject to all relevant City regulations and policies. 2) The applicant shall provide information necessary to confirm that gravity sewer service is practical. 3) Any proposed development proposal should include provisions for vegetative buffers to rural properties to the north and west. 4) The applicant shall provide information requested by the City Engineer to determine whether street improvements are necessary to support the development. 5) The street alignment should be updated so that future street connections are not provided to rural property. Attachments 1. DRAFT 6/14/2016 Planning Commission meeting 2. Staging Plan Flexibility Criteria 3. Engineering Comments dated May 9, 2016 4. DRAFT Comp Plan Information (Vision, Goals, Future Land Use) 5. Concept Plan 6. Location Maps submitted by applicant Excelsior Group Page 6 of 6 June 21, 2016 Concept Plan Review City Council Meeting 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT Meeting Minutes Tuesday June 14, 2016 1. Call to Order: Acting Chairperson White called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Planning Commissioners Chris Barry, Kim Murrin, Robin Reid, and Janet White. Absent: Planning Commissioners Todd Albers and Victoria Reid. Also Present: City Planner Dusty Finke. 2. Public Comments on Items not on the Agenda No comments made. 3. Update from City Council Proceedings Finke stated that Anderson was unable to attend tonight. He provided a brief update on the recent Council activity noting that final approval of the Wealshire project was granted and the Council accepted the resignation of Foote. He noted that Foote sold his house in Medina and therefore had to resign from the Commission. He advised that the City will be looking for a resident to fill the vacant position on the Commission and welcomed suggestions for residents that may be interested. He reviewed some roads in the City which will see construction in the upcoming months, noting that the Council spent the last few meetings going through the approval process for those projects. 4. Planning Department Report Finke provided an update. 5. Approval of the April 12, 2016 Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Motion by R. Reid, seconded by Murrin, to approve the April 12, 2016, Planning Commission minutes as presented. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Albers and V. Reid) 6. Public Hearing — Excelsior Group — 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road — PUD Concept Plan for a Subdivision of 87 Single Family Lots Finke presented a request for a PUD Concept Plan review for residential development at the property located at 2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road. He stated that the property is 37 acres, 31 net acres, and would be proposed to have 87 single family lots. He stated that the property is currently guided low density residential and is in the 2021 staging area. He noted that the property had been in the 2016 staging area but was shifted to the 2021 area when the amendment was made to the staging plan. He stated that previously the plan allowed for a property to jump ahead one five-year development cycle but when the plan amendment was made the flexibility was changed to only allow a two year jump ahead, which would allow the property to move ahead to 2019. He noted that the City is in the process of updating the Comprehensive Plan, noting that thus far in that process the subject sites have been considered rural residential. He advised that the projected growth has been substantially 53 reduced, almost 50 percent, by the Metropolitan Council which is why the staging plan was 54 amended and why the Comprehensive Plan updates include lesser density as well. He 55 identified the subject sites on an aerial map, noting that the properties are currently residential 56 with pastured land and wetlands. He described the adjacent uses and noted that the Concept 57 Plan does show the Wealshire project to the east, which recently received final approval from 58 the Council. He reviewed the proposed access that would be provided to the site and noted 59 that the plan includes a small arch in the center. He stated that the lots to the east would be 60 proposed as 55 feet wide lots with detached villas while the western half of the site would be 61 proposed as 65 to 75 feet wide with single family homes. He noted that would be similar to 62 the north portion of the Enclave or Fields of Medina. He stated that the City is on pace to 63 have the updated Comprehensive Plan in place prior to when the property could develop 64 given the flexibility which would allow a two year jump ahead to 2019. He stated that for 65 that reason staff believes that it would be logical for the Commission to review the Concept 66 under the draft version of the Comprehensive Plan, noting that if the City does like this 67 concept it would be possible to incorporate these properties as low density development 68 within the draft Comprehensive Plan, which could then be adjusted accordingly. He noted 69 that an application could be reviewed prior to the staging period but explained that in past 70 cases that were similar the occupancy of the building was not allowed until the staging period 71 was reached. He reviewed the land use map and noted that the Steering Committee has been 72 operating under the guise of meeting the minimum requirements of the system statements 73 from the Metropolitan Council. He noted that low density residential would be similar to R-1 74 zoning which would have larger lots, 90 feet in width, with larger setbacks than what is 75 proposed for this concept. He noted that an R-1 zoning would allow two units per acre while 76 this concept has 2.8 units per acre. He stated that in regard to transportation, staff noted the 77 limited right-in/right-out access at Mohawk Drive. He stated that the potential development 78 could have an impact on the traffic patterns planned for the City. He noted that the concept 79 review is advisory and does not require formal action. 80 81 Muffin asked for clarification as the report states that the eastern portion of the site would be 82 within the Rockford school district while the western portion would be within the Wayzata 83 school district. 84 85 Finke replied that there are two sites, the eastern 19 acres is within the Rockford school 86 district while the western homestead is in the Wayzata school district boundaries. 87 88 R. Reid referenced the future land use plan, noting that this property and the properties 89 around it, with the exception of the Wealshire property, are guided for rural residential. She 90 noted that the property along Willow is guided for low density and asked for some 91 background information on that decision. 92 93 Finke stated that while he cannot speak for the entire Steering Committee, the decision would 94 go towards the community goals to spread out development in different staging periods. He 95 noted that the property is closer to the full access intersection as well. 96 97 Barry referenced the challenge of the timing with updating the Comprehensive Plan noting 98 that it is difficult to make a recommendation as the property straddles two different planes. 99 100 Glen Schmidt stated that the Excelsior Group does a lot of residential development noting 101 that he is present in representation of the property owners. He stated that they do understand 102 that the property resides in the flux area. He explained that the property was in the 2016 103 staging area and was moved to the 2021 area. He noted that based on the surrounding uses it 104 would make sense for this property to be residential. He explained that it would make sense 105 to have development around the Wealshire property so that property is not on an "island", OA 106 noting that the detached villas could be a good transition from that development. He 107 displayed a sketch of what the development could look like, noting that the PUD concept is 108 different than the normal lot size. He stated that the housing products proposed for the 109 concept would also provide some housing types that are currently not available in abundance 110 within Medina. He stated that they have not spoken with the Wealshire property but they 111 would be willing to work with that property in regard to connection of trails and potential 112 access points. He stated that the engineer believes that the sewer could be served by gravity 113 sewer going back to the existing sewer line located at Chippewa and Mohawk. He stated that 114 the intent was to bring the potential project to the City and determine if it would be desirable, 115 noting that they would be flexible in the method used to go forward. He noted that 116 preliminarily the site could be serviced by existing infrastructure and would provide a mix of 117 housing, perhaps for the people that work across the street. He noted that the location 118 adjacent to Wealshire would allow a family to purchase a home close to their loved one that 119 lives at Wealshire to make visiting much easier. He noted that the yards would be irrigated 120 through the stormwater ponds rather than using City water for irrigation. He stated that there 121 are wetlands and open space in the middle that would be protected. He did not anticipate any 122 updates needed for City streets. He stated that sewer and water are close and therefore could 123 be connected to. He advised that they work with local Minnesota builders to provide a nice 124 variety of housing types. He stated that trails and a park would be provided in the 125 community. He stated that although the products provided would not meet the definition of 126 affordable through the Metropolitan Council, the villas would have a price beginning in the 127 high $300,000's while the home would begin at $650,000 and the villas would be affordable 128 compared to the Medina housing stock. He stated that if there is support for the concept they 129 would work with staff to determine the best path to fruition. 130 131 Murrin referenced the exits and asked if there would be only one exit for the property. 132 133 Schmidt stated that they would anticipate the one entrance, where the current entrance to the 134 property is. He stated that if there is a determination that the roads to the north will not be 135 necessary perhaps they could work with Wealshire to connect to the fire road and make that 136 an actual road. 137 138 Murrin asked if there was a requirement for two access points for a development. 139 140 Finke stated that it is not a requirement, noting that there are other developments in the City 141 that were approved with one entrance. 142 143 Murrin noted that the proposed park would be three quarters of an acre and asked if the 144 applicant would be open to a larger park. 145 146 Schmidt replied that they would certainly consider that option. 147 148 White opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. 149 150 Bruce Workman stated that he is one of the landowners and has lived on the property for 30 151 years. He noted that originally he planned to sell the property 15 years ago but he liked it so 152 much in Medina that he decided to stay. He stated that he was surprised by the recent 153 potential changes to the Comprehensive Plan and did not think it was fair for the City to 154 leapfrog over their property to develop further to the east. He stated that Chippewa was a 155 ten -ton road, noting that he paid a high assessment, and that road would be sufficient. He 156 noted that the utilities are in place as well and believed the City should do what is right for 157 the landowners and the City. He noted that the other landowner has also lived on his property 158 for over 30 years. He stated that this would be the right development at the right time. He 159 stated that the pond is 16 feet deep and has fish in it, which would be a great amenity next to 160 the park. 161 162 Craig Gray, spoke in representation of his mother who lives at 1951 Chippewa Road, and 163 stated that he is not sure how he feels about this concept compared to the draft 164 Comprehensive Plan. He stated that he does not have any objections to the concept and 165 believed that the market would dictate whether or not the development would be successful. 166 He stated that if there is a demand for this development, it should be built. He noted that the 167 properties around this area have been allowed develop and believed that the road would 168 ultimately need to be upgraded, which his family would need to contribute towards. He did 169 not believe that was fair as his family would be restricted to develop under rural residential. 170 He believed that his family should be given the same consideration as this plan and as the 171 Cavanaugh property. He stated that it seems ridiculous that this area is intended to be an 172 island of rural residential. 173 174 Brian Stephenson stated that he owns the property to the north of the eastern property. He 175 noted that his concern is that if this concept moves forward then the surrounding properties 176 should all be included in a similar development standards and staging. He stated that he has 177 lived on his property for 30 years and if this property develops with houses he will move on. 178 179 White closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. 180 181 Murrin asked how long the applicant has owned the land. It was clarified that the landowners 182 still own the land and this is simply a concept. She stated that she would like to keep as much 183 open space as possible and would be concerned with adding more houses as the draft 184 Comprehensive Plan does not go in the direction of higher density. She stated that she has 185 concern with the setbacks, stating that if a development was allowed on that property she 186 would want to see less houses. She would also want to ensure that the property could be 187 serviced by sewer and would like to see two access points. She stated that she would also 188 like to see a larger park. 189 190 R. Reid sated that there is fairly specific for PUD and even stricter criteria for the jump 191 ahead, noting that this development does not meet virtually any of the criteria. She did not 192 see any reason to grant the extreme variances for the small lots. She believed this to be an 193 ordinary development and did not find it to be innovative or preservation of natural features. 194 She stated that using the stormwater for lawn irrigation is already required and is not going 195 above or beyond. She stated that she would want to see the lot sizes meet the requirements 196 and did not see any reason to accommodate this development. 197 198 Barry agreed that the lot sizes are a lot smaller than what is allowed under R-1. He stated that 199 he does like the pond by the park. He stated that three parcels over is low density residential, 200 noting that this is a similar sized space. He noted that the City is still allowing that type of 201 development, just in different areas. He stated that perhaps the applicant should ask the 202 Steering Committee to look at their area again, as this area has been guided for low density 203 and is just recently proposed for change. He believed that low density residential would fit in 204 this location but that discussion would need to be had with the Steering Committee and staff. 205 He noted that the concept would need to better match the low density requirements if that 206 zoning was allowed. 207 208 White echoed the comments of the other Commissioners and agreed that the applicant should 209 bring their request for low density to the Steering Committee. She agreed that she did not 210 believe that the PUD criteria were met through this concept. 211 Cl 212 R. Reid stated that if a proposal were brought back that met R-1, there would be a worthwhile 213 discussion on whether this should be allowed to develop. She noted that the PUD and jump 214 ahead do not make sense. 215 216 Finke stated that the Council will review this concept the following Tuesday. 217 218 7. Public Hearing — Clough Properties — 45 Highway 55 — Plat, Shoreland Overlay 219 Hardcover Variance - Site Plan Review 220 221 Finke presented a request from Just for Kix at the property located at 45 Highway 55 for 222 construction of an 18,000 square foot commercial building. He noted that the first request 223 would combine the lot with recently annexed land from Plymouth to make the land one 224 developable site. He stated that a variance is requested from 25 to 50 percent of hardcover, 225 noting that 25 percent hardcover is the maximum allowed within the Elm Creek Shoreland 226 Overlay District and is similar to other adjacent properties. He advised that a rezoning would 227 also be required to match the other surrounding properties, noting that access would be 228 provided from the Aldi site. He noted that if the project moves forward the existing home 229 would be demolished, noting that the site is next to Aldi and surrounding by the Creek and 230 railroad tracks. He referenced an access to Highway 55, which would be closed. He stated 231 that the use is permitted within the District and with the exception of the variance for 232 hardcover all other elements of the Shoreland Overlay District would be met. He provided 233 information on the tree preservation and landscaping. He noted that there will be fill in the 234 wetland and the proper approval process and mitigation would be required. He noted that the 235 setbacks from the stream location would be met along with a buffer. He noted that the 236 application would be dependent on the variance request. He advised that similar variances 237 have been approved along Sioux Drive but noted that each variance must stand on its own 238 and the Commission should review the request against the variance criteria. He noted that 239 applicant does propose stormwater filtration above and beyond the minimum requirements in 240 order to mitigate the additional hardcover. He reviewed the proposed building materials and 241 design, noting that staff is looking for direction on whether additional modulation would be 242 required. He stated that the applicant does propose access from the property to the west onto 243 Sioux Drive and to close the Highway 55 access, which will be a positive to improving the 244 arterial flow of Highway 55. He stated that the applicant is looking for an emergency access 245 onto Highway 55, noting that it does appear to be supported by MnDOT which would greatly 246 improve the emergency circulation. He stated that staff suggested connecting the sidewalk to 247 the western property line, which will improve pedestrian traffic and could connect to Aldi if 248 the sidewalk is extended in that location. He stated that staff supports the plat in any 249 circumstance. He noted that the variance criteria are listed in the staff report along with 250 support of how that criteria is met and advised that there are small technical items that could 251 be updated to meet the standards. He stated that if the Commission finds that the criteria 252 have been met staff would recommend approval of all three action items. 253 254 R. Reid asked if the Elm Creek Watershed has reviewed the project. 255 256 Finke confirmed that the Watershed has reviewed and approved the request, stating that there 257 were a few technical items they wanted updated. 258 259 Andy Brandall, representing the applicant, stated that he is thankful for the cooperation of the 260 City throughout this process. He stated that he and the owner are in agreement with the 261 conditions noted in the staff report and advised that the Watershed took action and approved 262 their portion of the requests at their meeting the previous week. 263 264 White asked for more information on the building materials. 5 265 266 Brandall replied that the owner has decided to go with a predominantly precast building 267 because of the energy efficiency of the materials. He noted that the owner was unable to 268 attend and therefore he was attending in representation. He stated that the general theme 269 (arched windows and rock) is similar to the design of the other studios they own in attempt to 270 mimic an old New York style studio. 271 272 R. Reid asked if the parents are dropping the children off. 273 274 Brandall replied that there are a lot of younger students and noted that the studio design 275 includes a viewing area for parents. He noted that while some parents drop off and pick up, a 276 large amount of parents stay to watch their child. 277 278 R. Reid asked if this amount of parking would be needed if the City did not require this level 279 of parking. 280 281 Brandall replied that this amount of parking is actually the bare minimum for the studio and 282 therefore would not want a reduction in parking. 283 284 R. Reid was not sure how the parking lot will flow, as it seems awkward. She also believed 285 the intersection near Aldi will be problematic as this will add additional traffic to that area. 286 287 Brandall replied that a traffic study was done with the Aldi development and noted that the 288 intended use for this site was actually planned for higher use than this site as this site will 289 have off-peak use. 290 291 R. Reid stated that she likes the arched windows and the overall design and materials 292 proposed for the building. She stated that perhaps in other locations the City would not want 293 to compromise to this level but stated that she would be fine in this instance because the site 294 is unique and would need to be commercial in use. 295 296 Barry asked if the access to Highway 55 would be closed. 297 298 Brandall replied that with access being granted through the other property it would have been 299 very difficult to negotiate with MnDOT to maintain the access to Highway 55. He explained 300 that because this is a destination location the owner was not interested in keeping that access 301 open. 302 303 Barry replied that he remembers taking his daughter to dance class at 5:30 p.m., which he 304 would not consider to be off-peak. He asked what would happen when classes turn over and 305 there are parents attempting to leave and parents attempting to come and noted that a train 306 could come at the same time which would really throw things off. 307 308 R. Reid stated that the use would be off-peak because the majority of traffic will come to the 309 site during the evenings and weekends. 310 311 Barry stated that the Highway 55 access could be used to relieve some of the congestion from 312 the site but acknowledged that MnDOT may not have given that option. 313 314 White opened the public hearing at 8:11 p.m. 315 316 Jim Tiller, in representation of the Arnt property, noted that the sale of the property has 317 closed. He stated in his opinion this is a gateway property that will be seen by hundreds of Con 318 vehicles going west each day and believes that this will be an attractive high quality product. 319 He stated that this will not be a national chain property and will draw attention because it is 320 unique. 321 322 White closed the public hearing at 8:13 p.m. 323 324 Barry stated that perhaps the top could include additional modulation. He noted 325 acknowledged that the parking is intended to support a future addition but stated that the 326 amount of parking seems excessive for just three studios. He asked when the addition would 327 be planned. 328 329 Brandall replied that they would like to complete the addition soon but noted that timing did 330 not work financially at this time to build out the entire building. 331 332 R. Reid stated that at some time she believes there will be complaints regarding traffic with 333 the railroad. 334 335 Barry asked if MnDOT would be negotiable to opening the Highway 55 access in the future. 336 337 Finke replied that MnDOT wants to limit the amount of access onto Highway 55 and once an 338 access is closed it would not be reopened. 339 340 White noted that there are turn lane improvements being done on Sioux Drive currently. 341 342 Finke noted that the majority of the traffic would be turning right to access Highway 55 and 343 therefore would not be impacted by trains. 344 345 Barry asked if there is a way to keep the access to Highway 55 "open" for emergency access 346 which would provide opportunities for the future. 347 348 Finke did not believe there was an in between, either it would need to remain open or close. 349 He explained that the access is currently open for one house to access Highway 55 and 350 approval from MnDOT would be needed with the change in use to use that access. He stated 351 that the review and traffic study support that there will not be an issue with the proposed 352 amount of traffic for this site. 353 354 Barry stated that he would be interested in seeing that traffic study. 355 356 Murrin stated that the parking lot does not appear to be setup to exit onto Highway 55 and 357 therefore in order to use that access point the parking lot would need to be reconfigured. She 358 stated that whoever uses this site would have an issue with traffic flow. She asked if MnDOT 359 could be asked whether the access could remain open. 360 361 Finke stated that the applicant and City presumed closure of that access from the beginning. 362 363 Brandall replied that because there is an alternative access point from the Aldi site it would 364 be rare that MnDOT would allow the Highway 55 access. 365 366 Murrin asked who is paying for the turn lane improvements. 367 368 Finke replied that the business owners are paying for the cost of the project. 369 7 370 Murrin stated that MnDOT should be approached to determine if the access could remain 371 open, noting that perhaps a gravel path be used for the time being until it is known if the site 372 will need that additional access. She agreed that further modulation should be added to the 373 top of the building. She noted that perhaps the tan portion could be broken up as well. She 374 stated that she did have concern with filling the wetland but noted that her concern was 375 addressed through the staff presentation. She stated that she would support the project with 376 additional modulation and would also request from MnDOT to leave the Highway 55 access 377 open. 378 379 R. Reid stated that perhaps some landscaping could break up the tan wall. 380 381 Finke stated that the angles should be considered, noting the long wall would not be perfectly 382 in line with Highway 55 as it pivots away. He noted that additional landscaping would be 383 torn out when the addition comes forward. 384 385 White stated that this project is so much nicer than she anticipated that it would be and 386 appreciated the design of the applicant. She did not anticipate a large traffic problem, noting 387 that if people have a hard time going into a business they most likely will not choose to go 388 there. She stated that the City and businesses have done what they can to mitigate the issue 389 through the Sioux Drive project. She referenced the entrance and suggested modulation 390 above the entrance and noted that similar modulation could occur on the north side when the 391 addition is built. She stated that the brick accents between the windows could be extended to 392 the roof line to provide additional modulation. 393 394 White confirmed the consensus of the Commission that the criteria for a variance would be 395 met through this request. 396 397 Murrin asked and received confirmation that both parcels are in Medina, as one portion had 398 previously been located in Plymouth but was annexed. 399 400 R. Reid stated that she would like to see additional modulation on the north and south sides. 401 402 Barry agreed that both the Highway 55 side and parking lot sides would need modulation. 403 404 Murrin stated that the ends also need a little modulation. 405 406 R. Reid commented that the far end would not be that visible. 407 408 Barry stated that it would still make sense to remain consistent. 409 410 White confirmed that the Commission would desire additional modulation on the north, south 411 and west sides. 412 413 Murrin asked if the applicant should request to keep the MnDOT access open. 414 415 Finke stated that would go against multiple goals of the City and therefore should not be 416 requested. 417 418 Motion by Murrin, seconded by Reid, to recommend approval of the Variance, Plat and 419 Site Plan Review subject to the conditions noted in the staff report with an additional 420 condition requesting additional 3-D modulation on the south, west and north sides. Motion 421 approved unanimously. (Absent: Albers and V. Reid) 422 423 8. Potential Special Meeting: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 424 425 Finke stated the purpose of the August 3rd meeting would be to provide an opportunity for the 426 Council and Planning Commission to finalize the draft of the Land Use Plan. He noted that 427 once that portion is approved the engineers will begin to work on the technical side of the 428 Comprehensive Plan. He suggested that the Planning Commission keep the date open at this 429 time but noted that the meeting will not be called until it is known whether the progress 430 remains on track to meet that timeline. 431 432 9. Council Meeting Schedule 433 434 Finke advised that the Council will be meeting on Tuesday, June 2152 to consider the 435 Excelsior project and finalization of the Deerhill Preserve project. 436 437 White volunteered to attend the meeting. 438 439 White thanked Foote for his service and dedication to the Planning Commission. 440 441 10. Adiourn 442 443 Motion by Murrin, seconded by Barry, to adjourn the meeting at 8:40 p.m. Motion carried 444 unanimously. OJ Medina City Code 825. Zoning — Administration STAGING OF DEVELOPMENT TO BE SERVED BY CITY UTILITIES Section 825.34. Staging and Growth. Subd. 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the timing of growth and development within the city consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Such regulations are in the public interest to ensure the preservation of the rural heart of the City and to promote contiguous growth in order to provide efficient and cost-effective services to residents. Subd. 2. Urban Services Phasing Plan. (a) Property shall not be served by city water or sanitary sewer utilities prior to the date described within the Urban Services Phasing Plan, except as regulated herein. The Urban Services Phasing Plan, herein referred to as the "Phasing Plan," can be found within the Comprehensive Plan and is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein and as it may be amended from time to time. (b) The city council, following consultation of the planning commission, may consider requests for flexibility to the date which city water and sanitary sewer utility services are available according to the Phasing Plan, as permitted within the Comprehensive Plan. Properties shall only be prioritized for early development when it is determined by the city that a proposed project significantly achieves the criteria described below in Subd. 4. Such flexibility shall be at the sole discretion of the city council, and be considered as described herein. Subd. 3. Review Process for Phasing Plan Flexibility. (a) In order for a project to be granted flexibility to the Phasing Plan, the property shall require rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) district, unless the city council waives this requirement. The council shall only waive the PUD requirement upon a determination that review and regulation of the project can be accomplished through the development standards, review procedures, and other relevant regulations of the existing zoning district. (b) The city council shall deny a request for flexibility to the Phasing Plan, except upon a finding that the proposed project significantly achieves the criteria identified in Subd. 4 below. The following represents the minimum standard which must be met in order for the city council to consider flexibility to the Phasing Plan. The city council shall have the discretion to require achievement of additional city objectives during the review process. (1) The crucial factor described in Subd. and 4(a) shall be determined to be achieved; (2) Fifty or more points shall be achieved amongst the various primary and secondary factors described in Subd. 4(b) and Subd. 4(c). The city may grant a maximum of ten points for each primary factor and a maximum of five points for each secondary factor. (c) The project proposer shall be responsible to reimburse the city for the costs incurred by the city in reviewing the request, including any additional costs of analyzing the extent to which the project meets the review criteria for Phasing Plan flexibility. 825. Zoning —Administration Page 28 of 51 Medina City Code 825. Zoning — Administration Subd. 4. Criteria for Reviewing Requests for Phasing Plan Flexibility (a) Crucial factor: Infrastructure Capacity. The city shall review existing sanitary sewer, water, and street infrastructure to determine if sufficient capacity exists to support all three of the following: 1) existing development previously approved by the City; 2) the proposed project; and 3) all other development which has been identified in the Comprehensive Plan for the current Phasing period. If existing capacity is determined to be insufficient for the proposed project, but the project proposes to make necessary improvements, the city may give consideration to such proposal, provided the improvements are constructed at no cost to the city or other property owners. The improvements shall also be consistent with city infrastructure plans and policies and be designed to serve other future development when appropriate. (b) Primary factors (maximum of 10 points per item): (1) Sustainability. To achieve this objective, the project shall incorporate sustainable practices such as high energy efficiency, responsible construction materials and processes, site design which supports multiple transportation options, and other sustainable practices. (2) Natural resource protection and low impact development. To achieve this objective, the project shall incorporate low impact development practices and exceptional natural resource and ecological preservation. Meeting the minimum tree preservation and wetland protection regulations shall be equivalent to one point, with additional points granted for additional preservation. (3) Proximity to existing development. To achieve this objective, the project shall be adjacent to or a short distance from existing development which is served by city utility services. Property which is immediately adjacent to existing development shall be granted the most points, with fewer points granted with increased distance. (4) Open Space Protection. To achieve this objective, the project shall permanently protect open space from development. The number of points granted shall be based on the relative size of the open space area protected and the ecological value of the open space. (5) Limited impacts on city services. Points for this objective shall be based upon the expected need for city services, with fewer points granted for projects which have a higher potential impact. For example: (i) Projects which can access regional roadways with limited distance on city streets may be granted additional points. (ii) Commercial uses which create lower levels of traffic, particularly truck traffic, may be granted additional points. (iii) Commercial uses with lower water usage may be granted additional points. (c) Secondary factors (maximum of 5 points per item): (1) High quality architectural design and materials. Points may be granted for this objective for a number of different elements. Meeting the minimum requirements of the underlying zoning district with regards to building 825. Zoning —Administration Page 29 of 51 Medina City Code 825. Zoning — Administration materials, modulation, and other relevant standards would be equivalent to one point. Additional elements may include: (i) Varying types of home within a single-family development. (ii) Utilization of more high quality building materials, such as brick and stone, than is required by the underlying zoning district. (iii) Four-sided architecture. (2) Community amenities. Points may be granted for this objective based on a number of different amenities, examples of which include: (i) Private trails, recreational, or gathering areas beyond which is required as part of park dedication requirements. (ii) High quality signage and lighting fixtures, to be maintained by the property owner(s). (3) Affordable housing (residential development only). To achieve this objective, affordability shall be guaranteed by a covenant or similar means approved by the city. The amount of points granted shall be based on the level of affordability as well as the proportion of units which are affordable. (4) Employment opportunities (commercial/business development only). Points for this objective shall be based on the number of employees, especially new positions which will be filled after the user begins operations within the city. (5) Other factors. The City may grant additional points to projects that meet objectives which are not specifically described above. Section 825.35. Zoning Amendments; Criteria for Granting Zoning Amendments. The City Council may adopt amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and zoning map. Such amendments shall not be issued indiscriminately but shall only be used as a means to reflect changes in the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Plan or changes in conditions in the City. Section 825.37. Procedure on Zoning Amendments. Subd. 1. An amendment to the text of the Ordinance or zoning map may be initiated by the City Council, the Planning Commission or by application of a property owner. Any amendment not initiated by the Planning Commission shall be referred to the Planning Commission for review and may not be acted upon by the Council until it has received the Planning Commission recommendations. Individuals wishing to initiate an amendment to the Zoning Ordinances shall fill out a zoning amendment application form signed by the property owner and submit it to the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 2. The property owner applying for a zoning amendment shall fill out and submit to the Administrator a rezoning application form. A survey shall be attached if requested by the Zoning Administrator. A site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity showing the following information: (a) location and dimensions of. lot, building, driveways, and off-street parking. (b) Distance between: building and front, side, and rear lot lines; principal building and 825. Zoning —Administration Page 30 of 51 WSB YY SB Assoc engineering • planning • environmental • construction May 9, 2016 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: The Excelsior Group Concept Plan — Engineering Review City Project No. LR-16-183 WSB Project No. 02712-890 Dear Mr. Finke: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed The Excelsior Group Concept plan submittal dated April 25, 2016. The plans propose to construct 83 single family parcels. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Site Plan & Civil 1. Verify structure builds and the feasibility of serving the area with a gravity sewer system as proposed. Show where the proposed connection points would be located to the existing system. 2. Looping connections will be required to minimize long dead-end watermain sections. The adjacent property to the east will be constructing a watermain that will provide a stub to the very northeast corner of The Excelsior Group site. 3. Verify that adequate water pressure will be available for those lots served by City water. 4. The concept plan shows two trail connections to the neighboring property to the east. The site plan for the adjacent property does not include trail connections to these locations. The applicant will need to work with the adjacent property owner to provide trail connections. Traffic 5. The concept plan shows future roadway connections to the north of the development. The applicant should provide an estimate of the traffic volume that would utilize the proposed roadways to reach the future development to the north. 6. The intersections should be analyzed to determine if turn lanes are required on Chippewa Road or nearby intersections for either capacity or safety. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02712-890\Admin\Dots\Submittal 042516\_2016-04-09 Excelsior Group Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx The Excelsior Group Concept Plan — Engineering Review May 9, 2016 Page 2 7. The posted speed limit on Chippewa Road is currently 30 mph, but the City will be increasing the speed limit to 40 mph in 2016. The proposed intersections should be analyzed for sight distance issues or concerns. Stormwater 8. The development will need to meet the City's infiltration requirement, which can be met by reusing stormwater from the proposed ponds for irrigation. 9. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards. Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jim Stremel, P.E. K:\02712-890Wdmin\Docs\.Submittal 042516\ 2016-04-09 Excelsior Group Concept Plan - WSB Comments.docx Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee Vision Statement Medina is a community united by a common goal: to sustain and enhance the quality of life of its residents. Medina will protect its significant natural resources and open space throughout the City, while honoring its rural heritage and fostering safe and well -designed neighborhoods, places of recreation and destinations for citizens to gather. Development within the City will be commensurate with available transportation systems, municipal services and school capacity. Community Goals Preserve rural vistas, open spaces, and wetlands in all parts of the community to promote the rural character of Medina. Protect and enhance the environment and natural resources throughout the community. Encourage and incent innovative and environmentally friendly approaches to planning, engineering and development. Expand urban services only as necessary to accommodate regionally forecasted residential growth, desired business opportunities and achievement of other Community Goals. Develop at a sustainable pace proportionate with capacity of schools and transportation, water supply and wastewater infrastructure available to the City. Spread development so that it is not geographically concentrated during particular timeframes. Promote public and private gathering places and civic events that serve the entire community. Preserve and expand trails and parks to provide community recreational facilities, connect neighborhoods, and encourage healthy lifestyles of its residents. Provide opportunities for a diversity of housing at a range of costs to support residents at all stages of their lives. Encourage an attractive, vibrant business community that complements the residential areas of the City. Maintain its commitment to public safety through support of the City's police department and coordination with its contracted volunteer fire departments. Manage the City through prudent budgeting processes, retaining a skilled and efficient staff and long-range planning and financial management. Draft 6/10/2016 P F7. 40 4b ► I ice_ � 1 �� LL � a ON I All Ell al 9 W i l. y� Tr, q 1 ,, �,�� ry \�¢ n n .•-1 � ����^; � ,-� I � ��`1 ; I `�.I 1 �l ;, ` ! � •`� � , ��_ ''� ..tm. a, , b , e. •. ]ems J ` � - i I 1 ,s wxx 77 1 ; - wl ,1 1 ^ ; 11.' \ .__' { `- ,{� I 4 I I ... '• - t, a t �I � :� � {-"�"`y��' 1,.1 - �,; I' .- ap wxaa \ , ' ...� .. t , , \ :. , l` 1 I � . — ._. � „♦ a .. � � _V `' , •••rrr--�� i �`4 t ! i - I e�aas.,;aS'� , I o i I - oil \ - �- , v P � I , I t , r jai 'it ,- Y I W -.L �..%L` z�a ' t``— •_'' , /, � - ` � �� , ��\-; •.'- � A � `a�'. ` ...._.j ,I ',� �,` /'-- - •~\�\. :� `'�, - is _. fie. !'\ if I i I k/ ..' / , t t " � >i ' I t`` �� I i � , / ti\�\ .�-•�_---~� - r.. _... ` i / ,A �N Rk, -U 41'/, } _ L. I / e /1 -, 1 @t ' [ i % — _ `. ; ', �r i ��i i .; .. ``Jil- , .`�'a re rii e 1' 1 \\ ;"� .re-_ ' 3 ' '• I � � ."_, �! - - i _. � '_ r n CHlPcE+VA ROAD .. . .. ... a , ire CHIPPEWA jROAD- r'` Parcel Data- Proposed Design Data: 42 Single Family Lots Parcel Data- Proposed Design Data: 45 Lots Address 2212 Chippewa Road Min Width - 65 & 75 ft Address 2120 Chippewa Road Min Width - 55 ft PID 03-118-23-23-0005 Min Area - 9,000 sf PID 03118-23-24-0002 Min Area - 6,500 sf Area: 19.53 acres (850,549 sf) Fysb - a - / , 0'g Area: 17.62 acres (767,549 sf) F sb - a Y Description: The East 655.53 ft of the SW a of the NW 114 Sysb - 5' / 10' Description: Sysb - 7.5' / 7.5' Crn r - 25' ?? Cm r - 25?? Rysb - 25' Rysb - 20' 50' ROW 50' ROW 28' B-B Streets 28' B-B Streets 200 100 0 100 200 400 SCALE IN FEET DRAWING NAME NO. BY I DATE I REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT S AID AUTHOR17ATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. �1bas I se,q Fx wG SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. M m `^' y 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, N. 55391 (952)476-6000 me 2�r aF Pa Ra p� CITY PROJECT NO. Concept Plan - SF and Villas 042116 Workman & Scherber THE EXCELSIOR GROUP FILE NO. 24956-002 RSM _ — — — — — _ _ -- -- -- -- -- _ _ _ --- — — — — — — — — — --- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ --------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- -- ------------- DRAWN BY xxx MINNESOTA L CHECKED CHECKEDBY xxx DATE Name, P.E. Date: Lic. No. 01/13/16 I 1 z - d w z 2 _ MAPLE ST RR'S S kd INE E7; . Y� S '�o 6 I Independence o� 8 ❑ B C D E F G H i J K L I I I I - -C' - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - LOST HORSE RD '- HACKAMORERD ❑ p� y-`-F�OO J I I KATRINKA RD >-�C9 Qf , PAWNEER I C TES RANCH PR f . \ ; 9 Lij p 5� $ B G R N y y X 0 ASTE RD "P ¢O Q� Pe4e�r / . ram` V I 1, "Ind O CILIUM TR Q Q CHIPPEWA D \ I J ❑ 1 E- - I CH P Y l WNEE WOODS RD -4400 l/ 1 IT ARM I o ttv I I I I I I I I o f C9 z C I I a ¢ 1 T- Sar Hart Pro � � ----,--,tJP R ¢ MEANDERRD I O QQ I - -- - - -- ,,-------�� -- N,----� ----LU_----I -o -- -,-4000 ° EVERGREEN RD I I L LAC Es RI Rt I DR C 1- LE TRL - - - - - - - - - - - - - C -TOWE❑ - - - - �--, - 1 - 1- 3600 w LU I U m HAMEL RU I I I � ' n9 W a x 1(r Spurz fll [ .; - - - - -[ - - - - - BLACKFOOTTRL- - I - - -05 P�9 O - ❑ �-- --1 3200 I,' _\� I I I V��° I pP 3A S D TUCKS HCTIR1DALP TH ,-'School 'Lake( , I CHESTNUT RD o LURAPP RS TRL -0 9<,- - z 280 Z I w [ I I CHEYENNEITRL z I P - - - - i - - - J - --MORGAN RD - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - -x - - - -' -2400 I OLLY BUSH , � I I I I <KFvIFw o I - --.r rT I - - - 4 110[yi B r t- - - - - --- - - - - - - COUNTY ROAD 24 0 ❑ ��0� z o ' COTT OAVOOD TRL b - - �. ',� - 2000 o OAK CITE Z o 4F I I I i I I SPUR CIR o I I: Kabina I I O I HEROKEE R i QPO HFBOG OR VV DEERHILL RD I o NO x Ir - - - - 1_ `•' ' - - DEERHILLRD -l- - o - - -�%� - -1600 1 l➢ Valsfe p I I w I m BOBOLINK r I z _ I� OW ORNINGSID p �I R TRL I' , I �C", l Uone V, IV o Z � KELLER RD 2 I I o Q l -- ---- � --4 s l I - I - ---- ----- ° --e --- - - - - -- 1200 0 0 0 0 0 C)O b CD CD b d- O It co co N co O N N O C00 N 000 d- N � r Street & Address Finder Map See Reverse for Grid Guide and Neighborhood Maps N Miles 0 0.25 0.5 1 Map Date: September 16, 2015 Map 5.2 MEDIPMA Future Land Use Plan Guide Plan Rural Residential - Agriculture u Developing -Post 2030 Low Density Res 2.0 - 3.49 U/A Medium Density Res 3.5 - 6.99 U/A High Density Res 7 - 30 U/A Mixed Use 3.5 - 6.99 U/A - Mixed Use - Business 7 - 45 U/A Commercial - General Business Industrial Business Private Recreation (PREC) Parks and Recreation P-R - State or Regional —== Open Space Public Semi -Public 0 U/A Closed Sanitary Landfill Right -of -Way *This map is not perfectly precise. Actual boundaries may vary, and should be field verified, LastAmended: May 21, 2013 (CPA2030-4) Adopted: November 17, 2009 UTM, Zone 15N, NAD 83 Scale: 1:30,000 ��T v o�� All Map 5.3 MEDINA Staging and Growth Urban Services Phasing Plan Developed 2008 2001-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2025 - 2026-2030 Developing Post-2030 No Urban Services Planned Met Council LTSSA There are several critical infrastructure milestones that will control growth including: - The existing water infrastructure has capacity of approximately 160 units available until 2009. - The sewer constraints shall limit development to 2,000 units without improvements. Generally, the Phasing Plan demonstrates that development shall proceed in a east to west pattern. This phasing plan allows flexibility between adjacent phases to allow for proper infrastructure planning and development. The Grey area reflects the area identified by the City to be developed Post 2030. The Met Council has identified the LTSSA for potential future access to urban services. No services are planned during the timeframe covered by this Plan. Adopted: November 17, 2009 Parcel current as of October 2006 UTM, Zone 15N, NAD 83 Scale: 1:30,000 Agenda Item # 9B MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Debra Peterson, Associate Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 10, 2016 MEETING: June 21, 2016 City Council SUBJ: LeJeune — Lot Line Rearrangement — 2782 and 2820 County Road 24 Summary of Request Laurence and Jean LeJeune request approval of a lot line rearrangement between their properties at 2872 and 2820 County Road 24. The subject properties under consideration are currently zoned RR, Rural Residential with the properties to the east, west, and south also zoned RR. The properties to the north are zoned AG, Agricultural Preserve. An aerial of the site can be found below. M. } LeJeune Page 1 of 5 June 21, 2016 Lot Line Rearrangement City Council Meeting Each property address has two PID numbers which were not verified as legal lots of record since the lots are being combined. For future reference, the parcels are referred by their address as a single parcel. Analysis of 2782 County Road 24 Parcel This parcel currently includes a single family home, detached garage just north of the house, and a loafing shed that has since been removed. This parcel will reduce in size, providing land to the property to the west (2820 Co Rd 24) but will continue to meet all lot width, depth, and size requirements. This parcel did not have an alternate septic sight, so as part of the review process it was required the applicant show proof that an alternate septic site was present. Swedlund Services provided an alternative septic site design which was approved by the City's Building Official. Analysis of 2820 County Road 24 Parcel The parcel currently includes a single family home, barn and small sheds. This property is proposed to have two additional loafing sheds under 300 square feet after the Lot Line Rearrangement. The existing driveway is currently shared with the property to the west which is under the same ownership. A recorded shared driveway easement exists and no changes are proposed with the driveway. Minimum Requirement of 5 acres of Contiguous Suitable Soils per Lot City regulations require that property in the RR zoning district contain 5 acres of contiguous suitable soils for a septic system. The 2782 County Road 24 parcel meets and exceeds the minimum of 5 acres contiguous suitable soils; however, 2820 County Road 24 is non- conforming. The Lot Line Rearrangement will improve the quantity of contiguous suitable soils for the 2820 County Road 24 parcel from 3.33 to 4.70. The removal of suitable soils from 2782 County Road 24 will not reduce the contiguous suitable soils for that property since the suitable soils are coming from an area not counted towards contiguous. Because the City regulates required lot size in the RR district through area of contiguous suitable soils, the rearrangement would not technically reduce the conformance of the lots with lot size requirements. In fact, the rearrangement technically improves the 2820 parcel with suitable soils requirements. Drainage and Utility Easements Drainage and utility easements exist on both parcels in various locations along or near property lines. Staff suggests the interior drainage and utility easements be vacated, but is not a requirement; however, staff has placed as a condition of approval that the applicant provide drainage and utility easement legal descriptions and grant replacement easements to the City in a form and substance approved by the City Attorney. LeJeune Page 2 of 5 June 21, 2016 Lot Line Rearrangement City Council Meeting The following tables summarize the existing and proposed dimensional standards of the two properties in comparison to the requirements of the RR district. The areas highlighted do not meet minimum standards: Prior to Proposed Rearrangement: RR Requirement 2782 Co Rd 24 2820 Co Rd 24 Lot Area N/A 30.89 acres 23.43 acres Suitable Soils 5 acres contiguous 8.68 acres contiguous 3.33 acres contiguous Lot Width 300 feet 1145 feet 500 feet Lot Depth 200 feet 1443 feet 1623 feet Front Setback 50 feet 300 feet 1200+ feet (House) Rear Setback 50 feet (if > 5 acres) 780 feet 150+ feet (house) Rear Setback 150 feet 705 feet N/A (garage) Side Setbacks 50 feet (if > 5 acres) 60 feet (west) 247 feet (west) (House) 877 feet (east) 540 feet (east) Side Setbacks 50 feet (if > 5 acres) 10 feet N/A Detached Garage) Side Setbacks 150 feet 45 feet — Loafing 120 feet (east — Barn) (Barn/Loafing Shed Shed 277 feet (west -Barn) or L-Shed) 20 feet (east-L-Shed) 450 feet(west-L-Shed) After Proposed Rearrangement: RR Requirement 2782 Co Rd 24 2820 Co Rd 24 Lot Area N/A 27.15 27.17 Suitable Soils 5 acres contiguous 8.68 4.70 (increased) Lot Width 300 feet 1145 feet 500 feet Lot Depth 200 feet 1443 feet 1623 feet Front Setback - 50 feet 300 feet 1200+ feet/no change House Rear Setback — 50 feet (if > 5 acres) 455 feet 150+ feet/no change House Rear Setback — 50 feet (if > 5 acres) 375 feet/reduced N/A Garage Side Setback- 20 feet (if < 5 acres) 60 feet (west) 1200+ feet/no change House 877 feet (east) Side Setback - 50 feet (if > 5 acres) 10 feet (no change) N/A Garage Side Setbacks 150 feet Removed since 510 feet (east — Barn) (Barn/loafing sheds) submittal 277 feet (west -Barn) 105 feet (east-L-Shed) 450 feet west-L-Shed LeJeune Page 3 of 5 June 21, 2016 Lot Line Rearrangement City Council Meeting Wetlands/Floodylain/Easements A floodplain with an undetermined flood elevation is located within the wetland area at the northwest corner and south of the existing driveway on the 2820 parcel. Drainage and utility easements are currently over these areas. The proposed lot rearrangement would not affect water resources. Access/Right-of-way Hennepin County Transportation Department has reviewed the proposed lot line rearrangement and has determined that the existing 80' full right-of-way section will continue to properly serve anticipated roadway needs including the existing on -road bikeway. Park Dedication A lot line rearrangement does not trigger park dedication requirements. Review Criteria/Staff Recommendation The subdivision ordinance establishes the following criteria when reviewing subdivisions, including subdivisions/rearrangements of land within the City. Staff has provided potential findings for each of the criterion. (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the City, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. The proposed rearrangement is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and is not premature because it does not affect the infrastructure necessary to serve the area. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. The proposed rearrangement does not alter the type of development on either property and does not affect the physical characteristics described above. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development, or does not meet minimum lot size standards. The rearrangement does not affect the density of development. (d) That the design of the subdivision, or the proposed improvements, is likely to cause substantial environmental damage. The proposed rearrangement does not necessitate improvements and is not likely to cause environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision, or the type of improvements, is likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed rearrangement does not necessitate improvements and is not likely to cause public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision, or the type of improvements, will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. LeJeune Page 4 of 5 June 21, 2016 Lot Line Rearrangement City Council Meeting The proposed rearrangement does not necessitate improvements and will not conflict with streets, easements, or right-of-way. Potential Council Action If the City Council concurs with the findings above, adoption of the attached resolution would be in order through the following action: Move to adopt the Resolution approving a lot line rearrangement between 2782 and 2820 County Road 24. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Exhibit prepared by surveyor showing proposed rearrangement LeJeune Page 5 of 5 June 21, 2016 Lot Line Rearrangement City Council Meeting Agenda Item #913 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-XX RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT BETWEEN 2782 COUNTY ROAD 24 AND 2820 COUNTY ROAD 24 WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Laurence F. LeJeune and Jean Y. LeJeune own properties within the City at 2782 and 2820 County Road 24; and WHEREAS, the LeJeune properties are described in Exhibit A and are collectively referred to herein as "the Properties"; and WHEREAS, the LeJeunes have requested approval to rearrange the common property lines between the Properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed lot line rearrangement on June 21, 2016, at which time all interested parties were heard; and WHEREAS, following the review, the City Council found that the rearrangement will not negatively impact any neighboring properties, impair the environment or public health, or conflict with any public purposes or plans of the City. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants approval of a lot line rearrangement which will result in the Properties being described as shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Owners shall provide legal descriptions and grant replacement easements to the City in a form and substance approved by the City Attorney. 2. The Owners shall file necessary paperwork with Hennepin County to effectuate the lot line adjustment within 180 days of approval or this approval becomes null and void. 3. The Owners shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the Lot Line Rearrangement and other relevant documents. Resolution No. 2016-17 March 2, 2016 Dated: June 21, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof - And the following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-XX 2 June 21, 2016 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Properties Prior to Rearrangement NORTHWEST PARCEL PID 16-118-23-34-0006 The East 500 feet of that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying North of the South 275 feet thereof, Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. ALSO That part of the West 400 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 51h Principal Meridian lying North of the South 25 acres thereof. PID 16-118-23-34-0004 The South 275 feet of the East 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian; AND that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of County Road No. 24 and East of the southerly extension of the West line of said East 500 feet. SOUTHEAST PARCEL PID 16-118-23-43-0004 The South 25 acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, excepting that part thereof lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16; thence West parallel with the South line of Section 16 a distance of 370 feet to a point; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Section 16 to the South line of said Section 16 and there terminating. ALSO EXCEPT that part of the above described property which lies northerly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 88 degrees 55 minutes 50 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 970.41 feet to the West line of the East 370 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 39 seconds West along the west line of the East 370 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 419.10 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 56 degrees 59 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 154.89 feet to the west line of the East 500.50 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 39 seconds East along said West line of the East 500.50 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to the North line of said South 25 acres, and said line there terminating. ALSO Resolution No. 2016-XX 3 June 21, 2016 That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 16 which lies north of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, south of the North 15 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, East of the West 400.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, and West of the East 500.50 feet; of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter. PID 21-118-23-12-0002 That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 24 and West of a line drawn parallel with the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 21 and 370 feet distant West therefrom as measured along the North line of said Northwest Quarter, except the following described parcel: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter and thence running North 736.56 feet; thence South 76 degrees East 1049.4 feet; thence South 70 degrees East 317.46 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 396 feet to the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence West 1320 feet to the place of beginning. ALSO That part of the following described tract of land lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 24 and West of a line parallel with the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian and 370 feet distant West therefrom as measured along the North line of said Northwest Quarter; That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter and thence running North 736.56 feet; thence South 76 degrees East 1049.4 feet; thence South 70 degrees East 317.46 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 396 feet to the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence West 1320 feet to the place of beginning. Resolution No. 2016-XX 4 June 21, 2016 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Properties After Rearrangement NORTHWEST PARCEL The East 500 feet of that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying North of the South 275 feet thereof, Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. ALSO That part of the West 400 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5t" Principal Meridian lying North of the South 25 acres thereof. ALSO The South 275 feet of the East 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5t" Principal Meridian; AND that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5t" Principal Meridian, lying North of County Road No. 24 and East of the southerly extension of the West line of said East 500 feet. ALSO That part of the South 25 acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5t" Principal Meridian which lies North of the South 483 feet of said South 25 acres and West of the East 851.33 feet of said South 25 acres. ALSO That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 16 which lies north of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, south of the North 15 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, East of the West 400.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, and west of the East 851.33 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter SOUTHEAST PARCEL That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5t" Principal Meridian lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 24 and West of a line drawn parallel with the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 21 and 370 feet distant West therefrom as measured along the North line of said Northwest Quarter, except the following described parcel: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5t" Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter and thence running North 736.56 feet; thence South 76 degrees East 1049.4 feet; thence South 70 degrees East 317.46 feet to the East line of said Resolution No. 2016-XX June 21, 2016 Northwest Quarter; thence South 396 feet to the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence West 1320 feet to the place of beginning. ALSO That part of the following described tract of land lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 24 and West of a line parallel with the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5t" Principal Meridian and 370 feet distant West therefrom as measured along the North line of said Northwest Quarter; That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5t" Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter and thence running North 736.56 feet; thence South 76 degrees East 1049.4 feet; thence South 70 degrees East 317.46 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 396 feet to the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence West 1320 feet to the place of beginning. ALSO The South 25 acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5t" Principal Meridian, excepting that part thereof lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16; thence West parallel with the South line of Section 16 a distance of 370 feet to a point; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Section 16 to the South line of the said Section 16 and there terminating. ALSO EXCEPT that part of the above described property which lies northerly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 88 degrees 55 minutes 50 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 970.41 feet to the West line of the East 370 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 39 seconds West along the west line of the East 370 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 419.10 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 56 degrees 59 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 154.89 feet to the west line of the East 500.50 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 39 seconds East along said West line of the East 500.50 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to the North line of said South 25 acres, and said line there terminating. ALSO EXCEPT that part of said South 25 acres which lies North of the South 483.00 feet of said South 25 acres, and West of the East 851.33 feet of said South 25 acres. ALSO That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 16 which lies north of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, south of the North 15 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; East of the West line of the East 851.33 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, and west of the East 500.5 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter. Resolution No. 2016-XX 6 June 21, 2016 PROPOSED LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LAURENCE F. LEJEUNE AND JEAN Y. LEJEUNE IN SECTIONS 16 & 21-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 0 150 N 89°25'06" E 373.93 1, NW CORNER OF SEC. 21-118-23 EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS NORTHWEST PARCEL PID 16-118-23-34-0006 The East 500 feet of that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying North of the South 275 feet thereof, Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. ALSO That part of the West 400 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of the South 25 acres thereof. PID 16-118-23-34-0004 The South 275 feet of the East 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian; AND that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of County Road No. 24 and East of the Southerly extension of the West line of said East 500 feet. 300 SCALE IN FEET SOUTHEAST PARCEL PID 16-118-23-43-0004 The South 25 acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian excepting that part thereof lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the South 25 acres of r f h Southeast Quarter f Section 16 thence West parallel with the said Southwest Quarter o the Sout eas Q arte o n distance f 7 f in h n South n parallel with the East South line of Section 16 a d sta ce o 3 0 feet to a point t e ce So and line of said Section 16 to the South line of the said Section 16 and there terminating; ALSO EXCEPT that part of the above described property which lies northerly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 88 degrees 55 minutes 50 seconds East, assumed bearing, I n h south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 970.41 feet along the Q to the west line of the East 370 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 39 seconds West along the west line of the East 370 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 419.10 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 56 degrees 59 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 154.89 feet to the west line of the East 500.50 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 39 seconds East along said West line of the East 500.50 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to the North line of said South 25 acres, and said line there terminating. ALSO That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 16 which lies north of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, south of the North 15 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, East of the West 400.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, and west of the East 500.50 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter. PID 21-118-23-12-0002 That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 24 and West of a line parallel with the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 21 and 370 feet distant West therefrom as measured along the North line of said Northwest Quarter, except the following described parcel: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter and thence running North 736.56 feet; thence South 76 degrees East 1049.4 feet; thence South 70 degrees East 317.46 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 396 feet to the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence West 1320 feet to the place of beginning. ALSO That part of the following described tract of land lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 24 and West of a line parallel with the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian and 370 feet distant West therefrom as measured along the North line of said Northwest Quarter; That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter and thence running North 736.56 feet; thence South 76 degrees East 1049.4 feet; thence South 70 degrees East 317.46 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 396 feet to the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence West 1320 feet to the place of beginning. PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM SOUTHEAST PARCEL TO NORTHWEST PARCEL That part of the South 25 acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian which lies North of the South 483.00 feet of said South 25 acres and West of the East 851.33 feet of said South 25 acres. ALSO That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 16 which lies north of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, south of the North 15 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, East of the West 400.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, and west of the East 851.33 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter. e S 64 2g39 F 81.62 PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AFTER TRANSFER --�_ NORTHWEST PARCEL The East 500 feet of that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying North of the South 275 feet thereof, Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. ALSO That part of the West 400 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of the South 25 acres thereof. ALSO The South 275 feet of the East 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian; AND that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying North of County Road No. 24 and East of the Southerly extension of the West line of said East 500 feet. ALSO That part of the South 25 acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian which lies North of the South 483.00 feet of said South 25 acres and West of the East 851.33 feet of said South 25 acres. ALSO That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 16 which lies north of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast uarter, south f the North 1 Q Q o ort 5 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, East of the West 400.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, and west of the East 851.33 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter. SOUTHEAST PARCEL That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 24 and West of a line parallel with the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 21 and 370 feet distant West therefrom as measured along the North line of said Northwest Quarter, except the following described parcel: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said NorthwestQuarter and then a running North 736.5 feet- then South 76 c g rt 6 eet, thence degrees East 1049.4 feet; thence South 70 degrees East 317.46 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 396 feet to the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence West 1320 feet to the place of beginning. ALSO That part of the following described tract of land lying North of the centerline of County Road No. 24 and West of a line parallel with the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian and 370 feet distant West therefrom as measured along the North line of said Northwest Quarter; That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter and thence running North 736.56 feet; thence South 76 _ degrees East 1049.4 feet; thence South 70 degrees East 317.46 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 396 feet to the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence West 1320 feet to the place of beginning. ALSO The South 25 acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian excepting that part thereof lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16; thence West parallel with the South line of Section 16 a distance of 370 feet to a point; thence South and parallel with the East line of said Section 16 to the South line of the said Section 16 and there terminating; ALSO EXCEPT that part of the above described property which lies northerly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 88 degrees 55 minutes 50 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 970.41 feet to the west line of the East 370 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 39 seconds West along the west line of the East 370 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 419.10 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 56 degrees 59 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 154.89 feet to the west line of the East 500.50 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 24 minutes 39 seconds East along said West line of the East 500.50 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to the North line of said South 25 acres and said line there terminating, ALSO EXCEPT that part of said South 25 acres which lies North of the South 483.00 feet of said South 25 acres, and West of the East 851.33 feet of said South 25 acres. ALSO That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 16 which lies north of the South 25 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, south of the North 15 acres of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, East of the West line of the East 851.33 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, and west of the East 500.5 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter. NORTH LINE OF SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 16 ------ L41 B 0.01 +- AC N/ACC LINE PARALLEL WITH EAST LINE OF SE 1/4,.� SW 1/4, SEC. 16 0 cD 0 w' 0 0 0 z S DRAINAGE AND UTILITY,._.:: EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 7749293 i PER DOC. : 7749293 I \ 0.03+- AC N/ACC (89'29'32" E 500.02 S 89°28'09" E 400.02 \L49A I 0:17+— � / 0 SHED \ ACC DRAINAGE EASEMENT — — — — — — — — — — — — — — T NORTH LINE OF SW 1/4, L36 o o , /� PER DOC. NO.7749293 - N v / N/ACC I L22D2\ \\ L 2F... SE 1/4, SEC. 16 0.61+<- -A,,C --- 400:00 \ \ \ LINE PARALLEL WITH L24A N/ACC \ 4 M WEST LINE OF SW 1/4, 1.39+- AC o SE 1/4, SEC. 16 / \ 0.98+- AC \ co EX N 22FH SSE i _.-- 40--- \---...__..\..._....._. \ o EAST LINE OF SE t4, SW 1/4, SEC. 16"�" L45A 5' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY / ACC I I EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 10.33+- ACC \\ 7749293 SHED 88 3 0.. ------ ----- -- _.. SOUTH LINE OF NORTH 15 ACRES OF SW 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC. 16 5' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 8910109 •................... .......................... Q 31.48 319.40 + \ C eq cV NORTH LINE OF SOUTH 25 ACRES o OF SW 1/4, SE 1/4, SE 16----- 0)1 ORS, P PARCEL TO BE A[ DED TO / M \ NORTHWEST PARRI�CE v W _ (3.74+- ACRES) / Q - I NORTHWEST PARCEL 1.75+- AC / ACC o I WEST LINE OF EAST 500.5 FT. Cl) SHED L7 SHED / L45A o OF SW 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC. 16 \ ADDRESS=2820 CO. RD. NO. 24 14, AC ` o WEST LINE OW 1/4, cA 0 L22D 9.11 +- AC SE 1/4, SEC.I�6S \ S 89021'30" E\ 488.75 `\ Dt\*VEWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. \ 0.32+- AC \ --- 7833Nk REPLACES DOC. NOS 4249149� 4249152A 4441442 EDGE OF LOW GROUND FROM--- _>` 1, \ \ \\ HENN. CO. 1/2 SECTION SHEET LINE PRALLEL WITH o \ SOUTH IIZJ�E OF SE 1/4._ L16A \ SW 1/4, SEC. 1600 N/ACC �`. �6 02� 3" W 500.(�3 � W DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER-"-- \ \ \ o DOC. NO. 7749293- ,n Q \ f 1 o LU y 122F o; \ Z :)r)0�+- AC I ScAC N/ACC N; \ GARAGE / N7ACC� � I\ NORTH 35 63 — LINE OF NE 1/4, rn / I M AT S CORNER NW 1/4, SEC. 21 �-� ' F SW 1/4. S 1/4, oNiHOUSE r R 'SEC. 16 \ cam, SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF N \\\ / j �� L36A\\ � WEST LINE OF EAST 500 FT. OF SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 16 W _ \1.76+- AC \ �\ " L41 F / / \\/Acc N o N N/ACC z 1.71 +- AC R= 776.36 \ o 0) d` 1528 29 �4 19211'42„ \ : 2j131 22 O U N TY ROAD N b °32'28" w ` .73 '; Z S 89°32'28" E 1483.72' o \ AC N .� R=1473.28 a 82 06j L=168.15 EAST LINE OF NE 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 21 NORTHWEST PARCEL 23.43+- ACRES BEFORE 27.17+- ACRES AFTER 3.59+- ACRES ACCEPTABLE SOILS BEFORE (3.33+- ACRES CONTIGUOUS) 4.96+- ACRES ACCEPTABLE SOILS AFTER (4.70+- ACRES CONTIGUOUS) SOUTHEAST PARCEL 30.89+- ACRES BEFORE (EXCLUDING CO. RD. NO. 24 R.O.W.) 27.15+- ACRES AFTER (EXCLUDING CO. RD. NO. 24 R.O.W.) 10.37+- ACRES ACCEPTABLE SOILS BEFORE (8.68+- ACRES CONTIGUOUS) 9.00+- ACRES ACCEPTABLE SOILS AFTER (8.68+- ACRES CONTIGUOUS) ACC DENOTES ACCEPTABLE SOILS N/ACC DENOTES UNACCEPTABLE SOILS I 851.33 ---------------- 7oug292EAST LINE OF SW"1/4, kL / SE 1/4, SEC. 16 - 1 �MQ9.37 : - U I to Q) to Z W z — U) z CL � N d± r QJ Q � Q X C� Cl J Q U. O °z O � W Q0>� r z W r ti J W d" O N LO W 0) MWzJ.. W z ' ZWz0 °>.0CL o L22D2 N/ACC IJz c� I , LINE PARALLE WITHaI + EAST LINE OF W.11.4 F /--51/4, SEC. 16 �\ / \ \ d d. Q J z I a; I I c J to N d o U)i CO : ' \ \ — e- w SOUTHEAST PARCEL 5' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO \ 8910109 \ SOUTH L1N€ OF SW / \ SE 1/4, SEC.�6 _ — — S 891211301, E 370.00 — — — N 89`21'36' M 9M-r3 /\ FALLS UNDER I NORTH LINE OF NW_ 1/4, / t HORSE JUMP / NE 1/4, SEC. 21 ' I � I 3RAVEL DRIVE I L22C2 ACC L36A 8.68+- AC N/ACC / 2.44+- AC I � I ADDRESS = 2782 CO. RD. NO. 24 I \ \ 0 o 17 _ L cyj- w / rn \ I o I o � N ;t o w o 1 0 0 4 A d 3 S 3 I 4`. j3;56 8 \ S9�S�4 L22D2 N/ACC EAST LINE OF NW 1/4, I z S` \ F 70 \� 2.43+- AC NE 1/4, SEC. 21 I \ 76S`3 3 76°4625' E 11 /LSO 1 04g 40 i 9 'C ?4 1 ,N36. E 69. 56 26 8?)8S2g, � -- \ F � ° 9 F WEST LINE OF NW 1/4, 4, 09°3 •64 3343 NE 1/4, SEC. 21 SW CORNER OF NW 1/4, NE 1/4 OF SEC. 21 SOUTH LINE OF NW 1/4, NE 1/4, SEC. 21 This survey shows the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of several buildings and driveways thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. • Iron marker found o Iron marker set Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum NOTE: Easements shown are per Burnet Title Commitment No. 16-07900 dated 4-24-15 7 N 78°53, " R,.- 32W .4 �429 83.90 :6 2609 72 R, 1 `O6° g 64 �a129292�, `785.99 to %`6581751^ o z5696,52 ( W a=01 °047� I L=106.81 Q W I v I a (�U)Z O Da= —:2to U U) — F- z ILU Cr Q W 10 111A 00 2.86 a- Oz woe: o!�w 0>Z Oof WE of P:)0 C/))_ UU> z U 0_ � U) LijCoo w - 2 QQ z U JH z Wo z � U)Z z z F:D! U_ ♦- J �� LLmo< o Q�- < mWaLL wo_�0 =<Z3: Q J 0 w z z � p � Q c� I w co �T" Q o6 a co 16-ZUZ Agenda Item #9C MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 14, 2016 MEETING: June 21, 2016 City Council Meeting SUBJ: Easement Vacation — 2605 Willow Drive — Public Hearing Background Glenn Jeffrey has requested a lot line rearrangement between his property at 2605 Willow Drive and neighboring property at 2505 Willow Drive. In connection with the rearrangement, the applicant has requested a vacation of drainage and utility easements which are currently around the perimeter of the property, because they would bisect the property following the rearrangement. The applicant proposes replacement easements along the perimeter of the newly rearranged lot. The property owners are still discussing the proposed lot line rearrangement and it is not prepared for review by the City Council. Staff had published a public hearing notice related to the easement vacation at the June 21 meeting. However, staff does not recommend that the Council consider the vacation until the lot line rearrangement is prepared review. However, staff recommends that the City Council open the Public Hearing, receive any comments, and then continue the hearing to the July 5 meeting. Potential Action Move to continue the public hearing related to the vacation of drainage and utility easements on 2605 Willow Drive to the July 5, 2016 City Council meeting. Attachment DRAFT resolution vacating drainage and utility easements Glenn Jeffrey Page 1 of 1 June 21, 2016 Easement Vacation — 2605 Willow Drive City Council Meeting Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-## RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AT 2605 WILLOW DRIVE WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Glenn W. and Linda R. Jeffrey (the "Owners") own property within the City at 2605 Willow Drive (the "Property"), which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, there exists along the perimeter of the Property certain drainage and utility easements which are legally described in Exhibit B, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Owners has requested approval of a lot line rearrangement between the Property and neighboring land; and WHEREAS, following the rearrangement, the easements would no longer be along the perimeter of the Property but would instead bisect the lots; and WHEREAS, the Owners has requested that the City vacate the drainage and utility easements described in Exhibit B and has proposed replacement along the newly rearranged Property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 412.851, the City scheduled a public hearing to consider the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was posted, published in the official newspaper and mailed to the owners of affected properties, all in accordance with law; and WHEREAS, the City held the public hearing on the proposed vacation on June 21, 2016 and July 5, 2016, at which hearing all interested parties were heard; and WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the City determined that the vacation of the easements is in the public interest, subject to certain terms and conditions. Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota as follows: Subject to granting of replacement easements along the perimeter of the rearranged Property, the City hereby declares that the easements described in Exhibit B are vacated. 2. The city administrator or his designee is authorized and directed to prepare and present to the Hennepin County Auditor a notice that the City has completed these vacation proceedings and record with Hennepin County Recorder the vacation of the easements described in Exhibit B only upon completion of the condition noted in paragraph 1 above. k kk kk Dated: June 21, 2016 hhh itchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof - And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarier of Section 15 Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the Sth principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 930.86 feet North from the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarlcr; thence north 89 degrees 77 minutes49 seconds West parallel with said South line ofthc yorthwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 386.94 feet; thence South 09 degrees 22 minutes 47 seconds West 'a distance of 166.97 feet; thence South 89 degrees 39 minutes 38 seconds West a distance of 37.96 feet; thence North 13 degrccs 27 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 60.69 feet; thence North 24 degrees 24 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 5Z,95 feet; thence North 41 degrees 22 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 183.58 feet; thence North 68 degrees 28 minutes 55 seconds West a distance of465,10 feet to its intersection with Line "LY'; Line "Xis describedas follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of The. Southeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds West along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 400.84 feet; thence North 3 degrees 53 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 344.43 feet; thence North 13 degrees 41 minutes 52 seconds West a distance of 95.71 feet; thence North 1 degree 09 minutes. 08 seconds East a distance of 384.24 feet; thence North 37 degrees 13 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 223.27 feet along it line to hereinafter be referred to as Line 'A"; thence North 66 degrees 51 minutes 46 seconds West, a distance of 271.09 feet along a line to hereinafter be referred to as Line "B'% thence South 55 degrees 54 minutes 50 seconds West, a distance of 155.60 1e t along, a line to hereinafter be referred to as Line "C"; thence North 28 degrees 27 minutes 10 seconds West, a distance cf 355.52 feet along said Line "D" to the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter. thence North 28 degrees 27 minutes 10 seconds West, along said Line "13", a distance of 355.52 feet to said North line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 26 seconds East along said North line a distance of 1122.91 feet to the Northeast comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 03 seconds West along the Last Imo of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to the point of beginning. Together with a drainage and utility easement over, under and across a 10.00 foot strip of land around the perimeter of said property. Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Vacated Easement An easement for drainage and utility purposes over the Northerly, Easterly, Southerly, and Westerly 10.00 feet of the following described property: Thm part of the NoTtbmvs t QuwU r ior the Southeast Quarter of Sevian 15 Township I 19 Nm-tb, RmW 23 Wv-11 . she 5thPn.inapx1Meridian, described as follms; Eklginining at the Souffizai oomer ofsaid Northwmt Qmrilbu of ffic Southeast quarter' iPercr on an sssan_-1 -., :i-t -i 59 &gr= 22 minwea49smmds Weal 210bg the SOLL11 line of said NO1rthV08&t QUBMFofibe gwt-ICSM QLI;2310'a "iqUi..' I I - -..:ice North 3 &gteass 53 irnriuLc5 2q.�eeonds West a. &&raru: of 344-43 feet-, Lbemcie Ncmili 13 degmvi 41 ni-mi-lu.; 52 5t - I. - mf 95.71 ftet, [Fumv. I dLrncus 09,Tninutts 0 wwmd5 1,2150 ;L dt5jWWC uf3$4.24 (4-21; th---nLo. NiTaF 17 daf7wr; FI -, i ii:!v C.-i A,L5t ® china of 12327 ii;m lhaicv North 66 dcgcca 51 Tr in-.1;k, 4E. rimords Wnl A distance of 271,09 ]cat, thence I wk­ wint . distance of 155.60 feet therce Norh 28 degrees 27 -mrwes :0 sc_,ands West a disunce of355.52 fve-. 10 rt,7 vnrl- I r - I Qire eT of the Southeast Qturier: thence SoLrh R9 29 Tninutcs 201 sce.Gnicis East along said Norik L.. i:. Nortbeast comar of said Norihwcsi Q _taficr of ille Sc,_chcasL Qua_ - Kr, -lime SouU-- 0 ikgrcin 04 :r1iJL_aC." ki: I sti<1Not%hwmOL*ne7 ciril:c S11L[hca3L Q-AL- d di,.1u=v pf 1�14,$G fir W OnL(3fb FM dtit tg ritia; Whkh lirs Nur%bffJyofthe full"ingdesoibcd line _,rd its Sou4mcguty eximim ftinninli at iapoint on the Dsl line afraid Nonhw=1 QwuWofthe South.,;1*1 Qcarter dis=930.36 feet K':-1 I Sowhimm miner or said'Norr.hwes: OureT afLl:c Southimat Qiuxtcr. thence North 119degrecs 22 Tn[r.gcs 49 smoeds W=parallel ,,A,,d- .,) lire Or'.hr Noricbwes-. Oaarccr OFLl:C SULIhORSt Quarter adistance of430.94 feet: thence Sou-Ji 52 degrees 46rilinuen 20 second, I.L.SCULPWOSICAY lbe o=ac abo.Nc de5cfibcd -.:_,cxxrry,and sand lino there nadir .o. Which is contained in Doc. No. 5770653 recorded in the -ce of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. UP Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT i I 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina, MN 55340.9790 p: 763.473.9209 f: 763-473-8858 IVI EDI NA non -emergency: 763.525.6210 4. MEMORANDUM Emergency gri-' TO: City Administrator Scott Johnson and City Council FROM: Director Edgar J. Belland DATE: August 8, 2017 RE: Department Updates 2016 Bike Rodeo Success On June 11, 2016, we held our annual Bike Rodeo at the Target store in Medina. We had representatives from both the Hamel and Loretto Fire Departments and several surrounding police departments to assist the children with the rodeo. Community Service Officer Brandon Wenande headed up the event with the assistance of the Medina Police Reserves. We had many children there and a good time was had by all. The numbers may have been down a bit due to the hot weather. Wenande estimated the number of kids that attended was around 100. Addition to the West Metro Drug Taskforce (WMDT) At the June WMDT meeting, the board voted to allow the Minnetrista Police Department to join our taskforce as of July 2016. The original agreement is in the process of being updated to accept Minnetrista. This will not change the total number of agents; Minnetrista will be replacing the agent that was from the Mound Police Department that was disbanded two years ago. New Squad Car Last week, we received one of the two new squads for 2016. It is just in time. The investigator's car is on its last leg. It has had more repairs this year than any other squad in the fleet. It has over 130,000 mile on it and it will be going to the auction in June. Patrol by Sergeant Jason Nelson Patrol Activities For the dates of May 31 to June 14, 2016, our officers issued 46 citations and 76 warnings for various traffic infractions. There were a total of four driving while impaired arrests, four traffic accidents, six medicals and eight alarms. On June 1, 2016, I stopped a vehicle after running a registration check and determined that the license plates that were on the vehicle did not belong on it. The driver was found to not have a driver's license due to multiple DWI convictions and the passenger was valid. After speaking with both parties, it was learned that they had just repurchased the vehicle back from West Hennepin Public Safety after a DWI conviction and vehicle seizure. The passenger was allowed to drive as he was valid but after leaving they switched for one reason or another. The driver was arrested and the passenger was issued a citation for marijuana possession. The vehicle was impounded again. On June 3, 2016, Officer Jessen stopped a vehicle for speeding on Highway 55 at approximately 3:30 am. The driver gave Officer Jessen a false name and was found to be intoxicated. The driver, when later identified, was found to have had four prior DWI convictions in the past 10 years and was also arrested for DWI after this stop. On June 4, 2016, Officer McKinley was dispatched to a residence for a robbery and assault that had just occurred. Homeowner reports being beaten by a male after allowing another male into his residence to use the restroom. Both subjects were later located in the 500 block of Clydesdale Trail and were arrested. One juvenile male was released to his mother and the other adult male was booked into Hennepin County Jail for robbery and assault. Chief Belland was called in and assisted with the case. On June 7, 2016, Officer McGill took a credit card cloning report. Victim reported that she had her credit card in hand but that someone had purchased over $400 worth of gift cards at Target. Case forwarded to Investigations. On June 11, 2016, Officers Converse and Boecker were dispatched to take a residential burglary report. Upon arrival, it was discovered that the homeowner had been out of town for two weeks and that when he came home, he found his house had been broken into. Jewelry and silver bars were reported missing. Case forwarded to Investigations. On June 13, 2016, Officer McGill took a burglary report from Holy Name Church. It was reported that the main office area had all its doors pried open sometime during the day on Sunday between the morning service and the evening service and that the daily offerings were missing from the safe. Approximately $29,000 was reported stolen. Case was forwarded to Investigations. Criminal Investigations by Investigator Charmane Domino Business had a large rock thrown through their front door, breaking the glass and causing some minor damage to the inside of the building. Nothing appeared to be missing. Report of a burglary in which a residence was broken into, ransacked and numerous items missing. A church was burglarized and the suspect was able to gain access to the safe. Estimated loss is over $29,000. Received a report of a possible Criminal Sexual Conduct in which an adult male claimed to have had sex with a minor female. Open cases currently under investigation: 10 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: May 31, 2016 MEETING: June 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • We have begun some work on drainage for the Cottonwood Trail project. A small piece of curb has been installed to help direct the water away from the residence at the end of the cul-de-sac. • The crew is working in Medina Momingside, replacing the blacktop around the manholes prior to sealcoating. • The Sioux Drive turn lane project is in full swing and is expected to be paved this Thursday, June 16th. This project has gone very well, with no complaints. There will be some seeding and other punch list items left, but the majority of the project will be complete by the end of the week. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER Well #4 is up and running again. We were fortunate to have some rainy weather during the time of repair. This cuts back on the need for well #7 for irrigation, and we were then able to use it for domestic use. Well #8 is moving right along with the piping being completed and the well house structure nearly buttoned up. There is still a lot of work to be done, but most of the excavation and piping is complete. Final questions to Hakanson were answered for them to complete the MS4 Report for this year and it should be sent in shortly. PARKS/TRAILS • There have been some requests for items at Maple and Walnut parks in the Independence Beach area. I will be bringing them up for discussion at the next Park Commission meeting. • The new scoreboard has been installed at the Hamel Legion Park baseball field. The project went well but it was much more of an undertaking than we expected. We worked with our local metal fabricator to get it framed up and utilized the existing footings and I -beams. It was necessary to hire a crane to lift it into position so it could be welded into place. We did go over budget on the installation because of the change of plan, but it is a much better installation. MISCELLANEOUS • The City received the last of the expense invoices from Cleanup Day, so Linda has attached a final income/expense report for this year. 2016 Clean-up Day Income & Expenses Appliances — 60 @5.00/each $ 300.00 Electronics — 6,778 pounds + 3 projection TVs @$50/each $1,691.80 Tires - Money collected from residents for tires recycled & ones PW found in ditches • Tires — 69 (Car) and 24 (Truck) $ 198.00 Fluorescent Bulbs —134 $ 80.48 Scrap Metals —10 tons (20,000 #s) of scrap steel & FREE 480 #s of vehicle batteries Household Batteries — 316 pounds FREE Bicycles for Ministry • 38 bikes FREE Garbage • 5 debris roll -offs - Randy's (4 mattresses (k $25 ea) $2,241.23 Food and other subblies: • Hot dog buns and pastries (Dobo's) 180.00 • Bags for scouts to clean up ditches & roadsides and for bagging up trees (3 boxes @ 24.15 each) 72.45 • Sam's Club: (Plates, cups, hot dogs, ketchup/mustard/relish, 2 jars of pickle spears, 10 boxes of potato chips, coffee, water & pop) 327.60 FOOD AND SUPPLIES: $ 580.05 EXPENSE TOTAL: $5091.56 INCOME TOTAL: $2,801.00 (Does not include trees below) TREES • 185 trees shipped (25 went to Tower Drive project) • 160 trees x $15.00 each = $2,400.00 (Income) • Tree Expense: $5,539.50 (Balance subsidized from Tree Fund) ORDER CHECKS JUNE 7. 2016 — JUNE 21. 2016 44441 RICHARD OR KRIS CAWOOD....................................................$250.00 44442 CENTERPOINT ENERGY...........................................................$365.95 44443 FARAH, PEGGY........................................................................$350.00 44444 HEIDEMANN,JAMES................................................................$150.00 44445 I+S GROUP, INC..................................................................$1,000.00 44446 KARODIA, KYISHNA.................................................................$250.00 44447 PETERSON, PAULA..................................................................$150.00 44448 THIELGES, JODI......................................................................$500.00 44449 AFO CONSULTANTS..............................................................$2,980.00 44450 ALLSTAR ELECTRIC..............................................................$1,044.05 44451 ASPEN MILLS INC....................................................................$997.95 44452 BERGERSON CASWELL INC................................................. $34,252.50 44453 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN......................................$33,233.00 44454 BUDGET PRINTING................................................................... $60.00 44455 BURDAS TOWING....................................................................$150.00 44456 CIRCLE V SPECIALTIES, INC................................................. $3,964.00 44457 CONTEMPORARY IMAGES........................................................$140.00 44458 DESIGNING NATURE, INC........................................................$331.50 44459 DOBOS...................................................................................$366.59 44460 EDEN PRAIRIE POLICE DEPARTMENT ........................................ $25.00 44461 FASTENAL COMPANY................................................................ $22.16 44462 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL.......................................................$549.45 44463 GRAINGER............................................................................... $46.39 44464 HACH COMPANY......................................................................$721.55 44465 HAMEL ATHLETIC CLUB...........................................................$950.00 44466 HAMEL LUMBER INC................................................................$484.00 44467 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH......................................................$923.41 44468 HENN COUNTY TAXPAYER SVCS DEPT...................................$1,006.15 44469 HENRYS WATERWORKS INC....................................................$142.36 44470 INTOXIMETERS INC................................................................$190.00 44471 KD & COMPANY RECYCLING INC............................................... $53.96 44472 KELLY'S WRECKER SERVICE INC..............................................$131.75 44473 LAND EQUIPMENT INC............................................................$170.79 44474 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN..........................................................$1,886.47 44475 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC.......................................................... $25.00 44476 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL .................................................. $22,637.15 44477 METROPOLITAN CONSORTIUM.............................................$1,250.00 44478 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT INC................................................... $15.75 44479 MN DVS................................................................................... $36.00 44480 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ........................................... $23.00 44481 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC......................................................... $64.71 44482 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR.......................................$3,775.00 44483 OFFICE DEPOT......................................................................... $45.28 44484 CITY OF ORONO..................................................................$1,995.40 44485 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIP. CO . ........................................... $106.56 44486 SAM'S CLUB............................................................................$119.92 44487 SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS INC.........................................$1,893.15 44488 JAMIE R WIOME...................................................................$5,533.34 44489 STREICHER'S..........................................................................$667.95 44490 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI..........................................................$2,483.15 44491 TEGRETE CORP.......................................................................$120.00 44492 TIMESAVER OFFSITE...............................................................$136.00 44493 TITAN MACHINERY................................................................... $77.31 Total Checks ......................................... $128,843.65 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS JUNE 7, 2016 — JUNE 21, 2016 003693E VOID......................................................................................... $0.00 003694E PRPERA............................................................................$14,661.22 003695E PR FED/FICA......................................................................$15,997.69 003696E PR MN Deferred Comp..........................................................$2,360.00 003697E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA....................................................$3,318.66 003698E SELECT ACCOUNT.................................................................. $793.12 003699E CITY OF MEDINA...................................................................... $19.00 003700E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL............................................. $20.00 003701EAFLAC .................................................................................... $789.76 003702E CULLIGAN-METRO.................................................................... $32.75 003703E FRONTIER................................................................................ $55.66 003704E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC........................................................... $277.98 003705E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC.......................................... $323.40 003706E PREMIUM WATERS INC........................................................... $104.59 003707E PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE BY PHONE....................................$1,000.00 003708E SELECT ACCOUNT................................................................$3,804.34 003709E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN..........................................$1,988.95 003710E ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICE....................................................$3,269.21 Total Electronic Checks $48,816.33 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT JUNE 15, 2016 507223 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L..................................................... $1,314.63 507224 BARNHART, ERIN A............................................................. $1,965.67 507225 BELLAND, EDGAR J.............................................................. $2,522.48 507226 BOECKER, KEVIN D............................................................. $2,644.79 507227 CONVERSE, KEITH A ............................................................ $2,267.08 507228 DINGMANN, IVAN W............................................................ $1,856.53 507229 DOMINO, CHARMANE.......................................................... $1,799.85 507230 ENDE, JOSEPH.................................................................... $1,409.33 507231 FINKE, DUSTIN D................................................................ $2,110.20 507232 GALLUP, JODI M.................................................................. $1,667.32 507233 GLEASON, JOHN M.............................................................. $1,805.75 507234 GREGORY, THOMAS............................................................ $1,851.11 507235 HALL, DAVID M................................................................... $2,028.89 507236 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S........................................................... $2,268.97 507237 JOHNSON, SCOTT T............................................................ $2,226.34 507238 KLAERS, ANNE M................................................................. $1,116.32 507239 LANE, LINDA....................................................................... $1,506.21 507240 LEUER, GREGORYJ............................................................. $2,053.89 507241 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R.................................................... $1,435.41 507242 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D......................................................... $1,328.00 507243 NELSON, JASON.................................................................. $2,943.87 507244 PETERSON, DEBRA A ........................................................... $1,614.14 507245 REINKING, DEREK M........................................................... $1,554.25 507246 SCHERER, STEVEN T........................................................... $2,259.38 507247 STAPLE, AMANDA.................................................................. $459.73 507248 VIEAU, CECILIA M............................................................... $1,134.24 507249 WENANDE, BRANDON S......................................................... $556.33 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $47,700.71 *SOFTWARE SKIPPED OVER Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-## RESOLUTION REGARDING THE 2016 DEERHILL ROAD EXTENSION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; ACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the Stonegate Farm, Inc. (the "Owner") and Property Resources Development Corporation (the "Developer") have petitioned that the City construct certain improvements for the benefit of the Owner's property, including the construction of Deerhill Road from its current terminus '/z mile west of Willow Drive to Homestead Trail and a dedicated turn lane on Homestead Trail onto the newly constructed Deerhill Road ("the Project"); and WHEREAS, the Owner and Developer have indicated their intent to enter into an agreement with the City, acknowledging that the Project solely benefits their property in an amount greater than the assessment and stating their willingness to waive rights to hearings and appeals; and WHEREAS, a report has been prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. containing information regarding whether the Project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the assessments for affected parcels; and WHEREAS, the report was reviewed by the city council on June 21, 2016; and WHEREAS, plans and specifications have been prepared by Sathre-Bergquest, Inc. for the Project which have been reviewed by the city council on June 21, 2016; and WHEREAS, the estimated total cost of the improvement is $1,085,720, the cost of which will be fully assessed to the Owner and Developer as petitioned. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the city of Medina, as follows: 1. The Project as described above is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report received and accepted by the city council on June 21, 2016. 2. The Project is hereby ordered as proposed. 3. The plans and specifications for the Project reviewed by the City Council on June 21, 2016 are hereby approved. Resolution No. 2016-### June 21, 2016 4. The city administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisements shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be received by the clerk until 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, July 14, 2016, at which time they will be publically opened in the council chambers of the city hall by the administrator and engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at 7:00 p.m. on July 19, 2016, in the council chambers of the city hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during the consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the administrator for 5 percent of the amount of such bid. BE IT FURTHERED RESOLVED that all procedural actions previously taken by City staff absent specific City Council direction are hereby ratified and approved. Dated: June 21, 2016. Mayor Attest: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 20164# June 21, 2016