HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes_CCMeeting_02212012i
CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2012, 7:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Mayor Brad Andersen, Council President Bruce Case, Council member Dan Gubler,
Council member Rob Geray, Council member Thane Price, City Clerk Robyn Keyes, Treasurers
Ron Nelson and Amy Sullivan, Public Works Director Zech Prouse, Police Chief Shannon
B asaraba.
VISITORS: David Louk, Sally Louk, Jolyn Louk, Bette Lovinus, Charlotte Maroney, Evadean
Long, Sam Molloy, Kevin Molloy, Dee Johnson, Barbara Schreier, Sharon Welker, Ron Roberts,
Ken Longmore, Lynn Longmore
Mayor Andersen welcomed everyone and Council President Case led with the Pledge of
Allegiance.
Consent Agenda. The minutes, financial report, and budget report were reviewed. Mayor
Andersen said the City was 33% through the fiscal year and the over-all budget was on track.
Council member Gubler made a motion to accept the consent agenda.
Council President Case seconded the motion.
All were in favor, motion carried.
Swear in Thane Price as Council Member. Mayor Andersen entertained a motion from the
Council to accept his appointment of Thane Price as Council member to fill the vacant seat of
Dennis McArthur.
Council President Case made a motion to accept Thane Price to fill the vacant Council seat.
Council member Geray seconded the motion.
Roll call as follows:
AYE: Council President Case, Council member Gubler, Council member Geray.
NAY: None.
Motion carried.
Mayor Andersen proceeded to swear Thane Price in as Council member.
Discus Pool Survey Results. Mayor Andersen said the splash park/pool survey was sent to
approximately 600 residences and businesses and19% were returned. Of those returned, 59%
were in favor of a splash park and 41% were against a splash park. 40 surveys who were in favor
of the splash park wanted it at the new park and 28 wanted it at the square.
The pool results showed 57% opposed to a pool and 43% in favor of a pool. The Mayor said not
all survey questions were answered on many of the surveys returned. Of those in favor of the
pool, 21 surveys returned said yes to the general obligation bond and 29 surveys returned said
1
yes to the property tax levy. The Mayor explained that a general obligation bond would only be
assessed if the revenues from the pool did not meet the obligation of the payment for that year.
The deficit of the payment would become the obligation of the taxpayers. The Mayor said the
property tax levy would assess the tax payers each year depending on the amount of the bond.
For example; a $250,000 bond would cost each tax payer approximately between $2.50 and
$4.50 per month in taxes.
The Mayor said he received many suggestions for names of the new park but the most popular
names were Pioneer Park and Mountain Ridge Park.
Mayor Andersen asked the members of the audience if they had input regarding the splash
park/pool survey.
Kevin Molloy said he was against encouraging new and different types of people to the area,
which a splash park would do. Mr. Molloy also said he wanted the entrance to the park to be
located on Iona Road instead of Quaky Aspen. Mr. Molloy said he would like to see the City
offer other activities than a splash park, but would rather see the park remain quiet and not have
activities available.
Barbara Schreier said the economy was too bad to be thinking about spending more money.
Jolyn Louk said she was against a pool in either location and was against wasting water. Ms.
Louk said she looked into the revenues and expenses of the Shelley Pool and the pool always
showed a deficit in money, but the citizens wanted to keep the pool. She said the City of Shelley
was offered a very large donation for the pool but the City turned the money down because of the
maintenance involved. Ms. Louk complimented the Mayor and Council for their good city
management in such difficult times and suggested they do not do anything like build a pool that
would cost the City so much money.
Mayor Andersen thanked everyone for their comments and input. The Mayor said he would like
to address some of the comments. He said both splash parks and pools used recirculated and
chlorinated water, so there was very little water consumption; certainly less than daily use of
homes that would be built on the property.
Mayor Andersen said the City did offer other activities such as; t-ball, pitching machine, girls
slow and fast pitch softball, a library, tennis, exercise trail, and walking path, which already
attracted people from outside the community and provided amenities for the people of Iona.
The Mayor said he also wanted to address a letter sent two months ago by Deb Sorenson. Mayor
Andersen said Mr. Sorenson provided a budget for the City of Ammon's pool, but the budget he
provided was a proposed budget and not one with actual revenues and expenditures.
The Mayor said he spoke with the City of Ammon and they typically made money on their pool
each year.
Mayor Andersen agreed that the City of Iona residents alone could not support the cost of a pool,
but people from the impact area and beyond would help support the effort. The Mayor pointed
2
out other projects that were opposed by many people, but once installed the amenities were used
daily. For example; a City of Iona Police Officer, the walking path, library, and t-ball. Mayor
Andersen said when the City first hired a part-time police officer many people were against the
idea and thought it was a waste of money, and now the majority of the people want and expect
fulltime coverage of law enforcement. Many people were against the walking path, and it is used
daily by school children and people out for a walk or run. The t-ball, pitching machine, and girl's
slow and fast pitch softball programs had become so popular that it could help support other
recreational events.
Mayor Andersen said the city could apply for grants for a splash park, but it also had enough
money in savings to pay for the park. The pool would be required to go to voter approval and if
approved it would take four to five years for the project to become implemented.
The Mayor also said he spoke with officials from the city of Shelley and they said even though
the City lost revenue on the pool, the people wanted the amenity so the council kept it open as a
service for the community.
Sally Louk asked if a splash park would go to vote.
Mayor Andersen said it would not!but instead be the decision of the Council since the City had
the money in savings.
Jolyn Louk said the City should buy a new plow truck, repair the street, or get all of the street
lights in working order instead of spending the money on recreation.
Mayor Andersen said the City had money budgeted for equipment replacement such as a plow
truck, and the City did repair different sections of the roads each year. The Mayor said the street
light issue was under discussion with the Council and Rocky Mountain Power.
Mrs. Molloy said she was concerned with children's safety and privacy at the new park, and
would there be a fence installed. She said she was concerned with young girls in bikinis at the
park.
Mayor Andersen said there were pros and cons regarding privacy fencing in parks; sometimes
privacy fences could create other security issues within the park such as providing opportunity
for dangerous acts to take place.
Mayor Andersen turned the discussion over to the Council.
Council President Case thanked everyone for coming and said he wished more people would
show up for the meetings. The President said a splash park would appeal to a younger crowd and
thought it was a good idea, much like the water feature at the Gate Way Mall in Salt Lake City,
but agreed the economic timing was not ideal for a pool.
Council member Price suggested there was a good probability that the splash park could be
funded by grant money instead of City money. Price also said the citizens may have a
3
misunderstanding of what was being proposed. The proposed splash park was not like what the
city of Rexburg had, but rather much smaller. Therefore, he believed there would not be much of
a draw because of its small size. Price said he doubted many people go to the Gate Way Mall just
for the water feature. Price said he managed the Shelley pool when he was younger and people
liked it because it was a community thing. Price also said a pool would provide jobs for the
youth of Iona. He agreed amenities did draw outside people, such as our local library. But the
splash park would be too small to hold outside user's interest and it would become a
neighborhood interests instead.
Council member Gubler said he did not care one way or another if there was a pool in the City;
he would not be using it. Gubler said he went house to house in his neighborhood and asked the
people if they wanted a pool, and they were not in favor. Gubler said he was opposed to a pool.
Council member Geray said 19% return on a survey was a fairly good turnout. Geray believed
the pool should be taken off the list of possibilities because the survey results indicated the
community didn't want it right now. Geray said a splash park was a more feasible idea and he
was in favor of looking for grant money. Geray said he agreed that fencing of the new park may
be a good idea on the south and west sides that were adjacent to residences, and keep the north
and east side open for visibility purposes. Geray suggested the City turn the splash park into an
ice rink during the winter.
Mayor Andersen said even though a pool bond would raise taxes slightly, the City could also
budget for the pool expenses. The Mayor reminded the Council and audience that even if the
pool was approved it would not be installed and ready to go until 2015 or 2016, and the splash
park would not be ready until 2013. The Mayor said he had many people come to him in favor of
a pool: it did not cost anything to vote, and the pool issue should be put on the ballot, then the
Council would know for sure what the majority of the community wanted.
Ken Longmore said he hardly saw anyone using the walking path or skate park. He said Iona was
a bedroom community to Idaho Falls and Iona residents could go to Idaho Falls or Ammon for
their recreation.
Mayor Andersen thanked everyone for their time.
Personnel Policy Approval. Mayor Andersen explained that the personnel policy had been
updated and needed approval.
Clerk Keyes said it was the policy that everyone had reviewed for the insurance premium
reduction program.
Council member Gubler recused himself because he had not read the policy update.
Council member Geray made a motion to approve the personnel policy
Council member Price seconded the motion.
4
All were in favor, motion carried.
Approval of the Audit Report. Council member Geray said he was concerned whether the
numbers were correct since he didn't have the time to review all the city's finances personally..
Mayor Andersen said the audit company had a good reputation and had been conducting the
external audit for the City for several years. The Mayor said typically the audit report was
approved during the time of the auditor's visit, but the Council had forgotten to approve it during
the report. The Mayor suggested that waiting a month to approve the report would give the
Council members time to review the report.
Council member Gubler made a motion to approve the audit report.
Council President Case seconded the motion.
All were in favor, motion carried.
Quit Claim Deed Ordinance Approval. Mayor Andersen explained that a variance public
hearing had taken place last month for Jon and Gretchen McMurtrey. The Council approved
vacating a section of alley and deeding the property to the McMurtrey's. Mayor Andersen
entertained a motion from the Council for Ordinance 167-16-12 vacating the alley.
Council member Gubler made a motion to approve Ordinance 167-16-12 vacating a certain alley
within the City of Iona, Idaho; particularly describing the said alley; authorizing and directing
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute and deliver on behalf of the City a quitclaim deed
conveying a portion of the vacated alley to the owner of the adjacent land; providing for effective
date of the ordinance. Council member Gubler also disposed of the rule of reading the ordinance
in full and on three separate occasions and that the ordinance passed on all three readings.
Council President Case seconded the motion.
Roll call as follows:
AYE: Council President Case, Council member Gubler, Council member Price, Council
member Geray.
NAY: None.
Motion carried.
Park Ordinance Approval. Council member Geray said he had some concerns with the Park
Ordinance such as, sections 8-1-7 and 8-1-8 were already captured in section 5-4-10 therefore
making them redundant and wondered if they were necessary.
Council President Case agreed with Geray.
Council member Geray questioned section 8-1-9 and the intent to define the animals allowed in
the park. Geray suggested that if City Code already mandated that animals were to always be
5
under the control of the owner then what difference did it make what type of animal it was. The
way the Park Ordinance was worded, someone with a pet other than a dog was not allowed in the
park.
Chief Basaraba said the City wanted to put all of the rules on one sign for the park and by
including redundant items in this ordinance then one ordinance could be referenced on the sign.
The Council agreed to table the approval for further review of the ordinance.
Cable Franchise Discussion. Clerk Keyes said Attorney Storer wanted to make sure the Council
was satisfied with the Cable Franchise Ordinance as written before it was sent to the cable
company for signature. The Council said they were and to send the ordinance to the cable
company.
Chief Basaraba Orlando Approval. Mayor Andersen explained to the audience that Chief
Basaraba had been selected by the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) to attend a conference
in Orlando Florida. ITD would be paying all of the expenses. The Mayor said he wanted the
Council's approval for the Chief to be absent from patrol to attend the five day conference.
Council member Gubler made a motion to approve the ITD training for Chief Basaraba.
Council member Price seconded the motion.
All were in favor, motion carried.
Emergency Operation Plan/Water Discussion. During the work meeting, the Council
discussed purchasing four water filtration systems for emergency purposes. Chief Basaraba
asked for approval to purchase the filters. The Council approved the purchase of seven water
filters at the approximate cost of $65 plus shipping for each filter.
Chief Basaraba said he needed to schedule EOP training with Whisper Mountain and asked the
Council to make a decision on the training they wanted. The Council agreed to the Incident
Command Station training at the cost of $1,000.
Reports
Chief Basaraba reported that the Citizen Patrol Program for Idaho Falls was a good program
and suggested piggy backing with them for training. The Chief said the start-up cost of the
program would be about $8,700 and the annual cost would be about $4,700.
Mayor Andersen said he worried about spending time and money on training and possibly
having a difficult time retaining people.
Council member Gubler asked how many people needed to be trained. Chief Basaraba said he
had not looked into the numbers yet.
Sally Louk asked how long the training was.
6
Chief Basaraba said the training was 2.5 hours per week for 10 weeks; then ride -a -longs must be
conducted.
Mayor Andersen asked Clerk Keyes to call the risk management company and see about liability
issues with the Citizen's Watch.
Council President Case asked how many people to plan for the Iona Days Friday night dinner.
The Council agreed to plan for about 200 adults and 25 children.
Clerk Keyes said many cities were adopting the Green River Ordinance which was an ordinance
requiring door to door vendors to have a back ground check performed by the Police Chief
before being issued a vendor permit. The Council thought it was a good idea and asked Clerk
Keyes to get more information.
Council member Gubler said the fire station was almost ready to be occupied. The Fire District
wanted to take full ownership of the Iona fire truck before spending money on its restoration.
Gubler said he wanted to look into purchasing a lift for trimming trees. Director Prouse said he
already had and they ran about $34,000. Mayor Andersen asked how much it cost to rent a lift.
Prouse said about $200 for the day, but he did not need it very often.
Mayor Andersen said a newer snow plow was more important right now than a lift.
Treasurer report. Mayor Andersen introduced Amy Sullivan as the replacement treasurer for
Ron Nelson when he retired.
Sullivan reported Merrill Lynch was no longer investing public funds so the City was moving its
money from Merrill Lynch to Zion's Bank. Sullivan said Zion's had the best interest rate
available.
Council member Gubler said the fire district was investing in a TIPS fund. He said he would get
her the information about the fund.
Council member Geray asked for suggestions for the Iona Days entertainment. The Council
offered some suggestions.
Council member Price asked what his assignments were for the City. The Mayor gave Price an
outline for liaison and special event assignments.
Mayor Andersen suggested the Council consider the name Pioneer Park for the new park.
Council President Case made a motion to adjourn. Council member Geray seconded the motion.
Adjourned 9:30 p.m.
7
CITY OF IONA
* *BUDGET
01-31-12
R E P O R T**
PAGE 3
**** GENERAL FUND **** ESTIMATED * * R E C E I P T E D * * UNRECEIPTED PERCENT
FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE REVENUE MTD YTD BALANCE RECEIPTED
001 305.000 STATE HIGHWAY USERS
001 310.000 STATE REVENUE SHARING
001 315.000 STATE LIQUOR TAX
001 320.000 BEER & DOG LICENSES
001 325.000 POLICE REVENUE
001 330.000 INTEREST
001 335.000 CABLE TV FRANCHISE
001 340.000 NATURAL GAS FRANCHISE
001 345.000 POWER FRANCHISE
001 355.000 BUILDING RENT
001 357.000 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES
001 358.000 GRANTS
001 360.000 PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
001 390.000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
001 395.000 RESERVES
52,000.00 11,891.06 22,916.80 29,083.20
44,000.00 11,156.93 23,361.07 20,638.93
36,000.00 9,298.00 18,596.00 17,404.00
500.00 30.00 65.00 435.00
18,000.00 391.50 2,032.75 15,967.25
500.00 7.39 46.90 453.10
5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00
12,000.00 .00 817.22 11,182.78
17,000.00 5,114.39 10,137.32 6,862.68
7,000.00 270.00 2,938.50 4,061.50
12,000.00 1,168.00 7,202.80 4,797.20
5,000.00 .00 3,000.00 2,000.00
212,000.00 111,280.19 119,275.28 92,724.72
7,000.00 1,260.01 1,501.01 5,498.99
60,000.00 .00 .00 60,000.00
44.07
53.09
51.66
13.00
11.29
9.38
6.81
59.63
41.98
60.02
60.00
56.26
21.44
**TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 488,000.00
151,867.47 211,890.65
276,109.35 43.42
**** GENERAL FUND **** ESTIMATED
FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE EXPENSE
** E X P E N D E D**
MTD YTD
UNEXPENDED PERCENT
BALANCE EXPENDED
410.000 PAYROLL 57,000.00 9,349.00 33,852.00 23,148.00
Sul 420.000 RETIREMENT 12,000.00 1,079.60 4,983.38 7,016.62
001 422.000 HEALTH INSURANCE 34,000.00 2,221.43 9,731.72 24,268.28
001 424.000 PAYROLL TAXES 11,000.00 927.36 4,049.52 6,950.48
001 440.000 ELECTRICITY - NATURAL GAS 20,000.00 2,417.67 6,269.36 13,730.64
001 445.000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8,000.00 380.41 3 089.37 4,910.63
001 446.000 TRAVEL 5,000.00 425.38 717.34 4,282.66
001 447.000 ADVERTISING 1,500.00 .00 143.35 1,356.65
001 450.000 INSURANCE LIABILITY 9,000.00 1,114.00 4,455.00 4,545.00
001 455.000 LEGAL & AUDIT FEES 12,000.00 4,100.00 6,800.00 5,200.00
001 459.000 POLICE -PAYROLL 61,000.00 3,944.00 15,636.00 45,364.00
001 460.000 POLICE-COUNTY/DISPATCH 1i,500.00 .00
.00 14,500.00
001 461.000 POLICE -RETIREMENT 7,000.00 469.76 2,054.09 4,945.91
001 462.000 POLICE -HEALTH INSURANCE 12,000.00 1,208.13 4,832.52 7,167.48
001 463.000 POLICE -TRAINING 8,000.00 1,000.00 3,100.00 4,900.00
001 464.000 POLICE -GENERAL 18,000.00 57.90 9,846.89 8,153.11
001 465.000 VEHICLE RENT
5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00
001 470.000 MAINTENANCE 90,000.00 7,864.57 24,302.92 65,697.08
001 472.000 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 1,797.00 5,640.80 4,359.20
.00 .00 .00
001 475.000 CIVIL DEFENSE
001 480.000 LIBRARY
2,000.00 .00 .00 2,000.00
001 485.000 LAND ACQUISITION
10,000.00 -00 .00 10,000.00
73,000.00 -00 32,571.00 40,429.00
001 490.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
8,000.00 .00 2,013.30 5,986.70
001 495.000 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
59.39
41.53
28.62
36.81
31.35
38.62
14.35
9.56
49.50
56.67
25.63
29.34
40.27
36.75
54.70
27.00
56.41
44.62
25.17
**TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENSES 486,000.00
**NET EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY(-)
38,356.21 174,088.56
313,911.44 35.67
113,511.26
37,802.09 37,802.09-
CITY OF IONA
** B U D G E T R E P O R T**
PAGE 5
01-31-12
**** WATER FUND **** ESTIMATED * * R E C E I P T E D * * UNRECEIPTED PERCENT
FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE REVENUE MTD YTD BALANCE RECEIPTED
002 305.000 COLLECTIONS 185,000.00 21,098.90 63,532.82 121,467.18
002 310.000 HOOK UP FEES 36,000.00 3,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00
002 315.000 INTEREST 500.00 25.25 91.59 408.41
002 350.000 TANK REPLACEMENT FUND 50,000.00 .00 .00 50,000.00
002 358.000 GRANTS 5,500.00 .00 .00 5,500.00
002 395.000 RESERVES 50,000.00 .00 .00 50,000.00
002 397.000 WATER BOND .00 .00 .00
34.34
50.00
18.32
**TOTAL WATER FUND REVENUE 327,000.00
24,124.15 81,624.41
245,375.59 24.96
**** WATER FUND **** ESTIMATED * *EXPENDED* * UNEXPENDED PERCENT
FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE EXPENSE MTD YTD BALANCE EXPENDED
002 410.000 SALARIES & BENEFITS 63,000.00 .00 .00 63,000.00
002 440.000 ELECTRICITY 27,000.00 1,787.30 12,497.09 14,502.91
002 445.000 OFFICE, SUPPLIES, LEGAL 8,000.00 776.33 3,326.51 4,673.49
002 450.000 ENGINEERING COSTS 10,000.00 .00 .00 10,000.00
002 460.000 VEHICLE EXPENSE .00 .00 .00
fiN465.000 VEHICLE RENT 7,000.00 .00 .00 7,000.00
UU2 470.000 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 52,000.00 2,980.95 14,970.72 37,029.28
002 480.000 BOND PAYMENT -00 .00 .00
002 482.000 BOND INTEREST .00 .00 .00
002 485.000 TANK REPLACEMENT FUND 90,000.00 .00 .00 90,000.00
002 490.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 70,000.00 .00 .00 70,000.00
002 497.000 WATER SYSTEM UPATE .00 .00 .00
46.29
41.58
28.79
**TOTAL WATER FUND EXPENSE 327,000.00
5,544.58 30,794.32
296,205.68 9.42
**NET EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY(-) 18,579.57
50,830.09 50,830.09-
CITY OF IONA
** B U D G E T R E P O R T*
0'401-31-12
PAGE 6
**** EQUIP REPLACEMENT **** ESTIMATED * * R E C E I P T E D * * UNRECEIPTED PERCENT
FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE REVENUE MTD YTD BALANCE RECEIPTED
003 305.000 EQUIP RENT --WATER 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00
003 310.000 EQUIP RENT --GENERAL 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00
003 395.000 EQUIP RESERVES --WATER 40,000.00 .00 .00 40,000.00
003 396.000 EQUIP RESERVES --GENERAL 40,000.00 .00 .00 40,000.00
**TOTAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT REVENUE
90,000.00 .00
.00 90,000.00
**** EQUIP REPLACEMENT ****
FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE
ESTIMATED ** E X P E N D E D**
EXPENSE
MTD YTD
UNEXPENDED PERCENT
BALANCE EXPENDED
003 410.000 EQUIP REPLACEMENT --WATER 45,000.00 .00 .00 45,000.00
003 415.000 EQUIP REPLACEMENT --GENERAL 45,000.00 .00 .00 45,000.00
003 490.000 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE .00 .00 .00
**TOTAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT EXPENSE
90,000.00 .00 .00 90,000.00
**NET EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY(-) .00 .00 .00
CITY OF IONA
** B U D G E T R E P O R T**
�01-31-12
PAGE 7
**** RECREATION FUND **** ESTIMATED * * R E C E I P T E D * * UNRECEIPTED PERCENT
FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE REVENUE MTD YTD BALANCE RECEIPTED
004 305.000 BASEBALL FEES 20,000.00 .00 .00 20,000.00
004 310.000 SHELTER RENTAL 250.00 .00 .00 250.00
004 320.000 WESTERN BOYS FEES 250.00 .00 .00 250.00
004 395.000 RESERVES .00 .00 .00
**TOTAL RECREATION FUND REVENUE
20,500.00 .00
.00 20,500.00
**** RECREATION FUND **** ESTIMATED
FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE EXPENSE
* *EXPENDED**
MTD YTD
UNEXPENDED PERCENT
BALANCE EXPENDED
004 410.000 RECREATION EQUIPMENT 2,500.00 .00
004 415.000 RECREATION LABOR 8,000.00 .00
004 420.000 BASEBALL SUPPLIES 7,000.00 .00
004 470.000 RECREATION MAINTENANCE 3,000.00 .00
m
**TOTAL RECREATION FUND EXPENSE
**NET EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY(-)
.00
.00
.00
.00
2,500.00
8,000.00
7,000.00
3,000.00
20,500.00 .00 .00 20,500.00
.00
.00 .00
MONTHLY EXPENSE REPORT
1111) 1 /31 /2012
Amount
Description
ROCKY MTN POWER
$ 2,996.51
ELECTRICITY
ALLEN ELDRIDGE
$ 1,248.00
INSPECTIONS & LABOR
BROADWAY FORD
$ 130.30
VEHICLE MAINT.
WHISPER MOUNTAIN
$ 1,000.00
POLICE PROJECT
BONNEVILLE CO. SHERIFF
$ 8.00
ALARM PERMIT
PSI
$ 59.91
GARBAGE
ROCKY MTN. BOILER
$ 75.00
CHEM. TEST KIT
STATE OF ID. DBS
$ 100.00
CERTIFY ELEVATOR
HOME DEPOT
$ 1,532.15
TOOLS, PARTS, & VINYL TILE
DELTA DENTAL
$ 419.25
HEALTH INSURANCE
ROCKHURST UNIV.
$ 425.38
TRAINING
CITY OF IDAHO FALLS
$ 686.00
ANIMAL CONTROL
HOLDEN KIDWELL
$ 800.00
RETAINER
ICRMP
$ 1,114.00
LIABILITY INSUR.
BLUE CROSS
$ 3,141.38
HEALTH INSURANCE
EARLE HART & ASSOC.
$ 3,300.00
AUDIT
ASE CARD SERVICE
$ 36.00
SOFTWARE
TETON MICROBIOLOGY
$ 170.00
WATER TESTS
DIGLINE
$ 192.06
DIGLINE
FAIRPOINT
$ 285.41
PHONE
FRED & WAYNES
$ 49.90
SERVICE POLICE CAR
JIMS TROPHY ROOM
$ 59.00
PLAQUE
WAXIE
$ 193.77
CLEANING SUPPLIES
AFLAC
$ 150.93
HEALTH INSURANCE
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS CO
$ 1,208.46
NATURAL GAS
IBSD
$ 1,344.00
SEWER
BON. CO. ROAD & BRIDGE
$ 1,901.40
SAND & GRAVEL
USPS
$ 273.68
WATER BILLS
DIGLINE
$ 8.76
DIGLINE
ROSE SHOP
$ 37.75
FLOWERS
WACKERLI AUTO
$ 38.96
SERVICE GMC
MICRO SERV
$ 132.90
INTERNET
CAL STORES
$ 135.08
TOOLS & PARTS
VERIZON
$ 160.51
PHONE
UNITED MAILING
$ 171.49
WATER BILLS
FLEET SERVICES
$ 1,398.15
FUEL (2 months)
F A LLS PLUMBING
$ 652.46
CURB BOX
STERN STATES
$ 617.54
SERVICE LOADER
$
$ 26,254.09
CITY OF IONA
BANK REPORT
DATE
1/31/2012
BANK OF COMMERCE
GENERAL CHECKING
$28,368.00
WATER CHECKING
$11,706.00
GENERAL SAVINGS
$184,430.00
WATER SAVINGS
$216,029.00
KEY BANK
GENERAL SAVINGS
$157, 375.00
WATER SAVINGS
$52,458.00
WELLS FARGO
WATER SAVINGS
$51,909.00
MERRILL LYNCH
GENERAL SAVINGS
$100, 962.00
$803,237.00
CITY OF IONA
HARASSMENT POLICY
Approved by the Mayor and City Council
January 17, 2012
DISCRIMINATORY WORKPLACE HARASSMENT POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
A. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Harassment Policy is to clearly establish the City's commitment to work to
provide a work environment free from unlawful harassment, to define discriminatory
harassment, and to set forth the procedures for investigating and resolving internal complaints
of harassment. Because of the importance of a workplace free from unlawful harassment, this
policy should be reviewed with each employee on a regular basis.
It is important that all employees treat all other employees and members of the public with
decency and respect. It is the responsibility of each and every employee, supervisor and
Department Head to prevent inappropriate behavior in the workplace. Inappropriate behavior
which impacts the workplace, or has the potential to impact the workplace, will not be tolerated.
This Policy applies to all terms and conditions of employment, including but not limited to,
hiring, placement, job retention, promotion, disciplinary action, layoff, reinstatement, transfer,
leave of absence, compensation and training.
B. POLICY
Harassment of an applicant for employment, a member of the public, or an employee by any
employee of the City on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age (40 and over)
and disability is in violation of State and/or Federal law and will not be tolerated by the City.
Employees found to be participating in any form of employment -related unlawful harassment or
retaliating against another employee for filing a complaint or cooperating with an investigation
shall be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.
C. RESPONSIBILITIES
The Citv: It is the responsibility of the City to develop this policy, provide training on this policy,
keep it up to date, and to ensure that any violation of this policy brought to its attention is dealt
with as required by law and according to this Policy.
The City should designate an official who will be responsible for following the Complaint
Procedures as set out in this policy. This official will be referred to as the "Designated Official."
Supervisors: It is the responsibility of supervisors to enforce the policy, to train new
employees on the policy, to make a regular review with all employees to ensure they know the
policy and to regularly check the workplace to make sure the policy is being followed.
If a supervisor observes that unlawful discrimination, harassment or retaliation is occurring,
he/she should take immediate action to address the problem. Such action should include, but
is not limited to, speaking directly with the affected person, developing a specific account of the
actions, omissions or occurrences that are deemed discriminatory, consulting with the
supervisor, or a Department Head and taking corrective or disciplinary action as appropriate. If
the alleged discrimination, harassment or retaliation is not within the supervisor's area of
responsibility or oversight, he/she should notify the Department Head or other appropriate
management employee, who should then take prompt steps to address the allegation.
If unlawful harassment is reported or alleged, it must be followed up. No complaining party
should be allowed to retract an allegation of unlawful harassment without proving that it was
made erroneously. If a supervisor receives information that discrimination, unlawful
harassment or retaliation might be occurring, he/she should follow the Complaint Procedure as
set out in this policy below.
Employees: It is the responsibility of each and every employee to know this policy and to
follow it. All City employees share the responsibility of understanding and preventing unlawful
discrimination and harassment. But, ultimately, no satisfactory investigation or resolution of
complaints can occur without the initiative and continued cooperation of the affected person.
Individuals who believe they have been discriminated against or unlawfully harassed have the
primary obligation of informing their supervisor, Department Head, Mayor, Human Resource
Officer or legal counsel for the City of the act of discrimination, unlawful harassment or
retaliation, recounting specific actions or occurrences whenever possible. It is imperative that
every employee treat every other employee and members of the public with decency and
respect so as to facilitate a sound professional work environment.
D. DEFINITIONS
For purposes of clarification, unlawful harassment includes but is not limited to the following
behaviors:
1. Verbal Harassment — Epithets, derogatory comments, slurs, propositioning, or otherwise
offensive words or comments on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age
(40 and over) and disability whether made in general, directed to an individual or directed to
a group of people regardless of whether the behavior was intended to harass. This
includes, but is not limited to, inappropriate sexually -oriented comments, including dress or
physical features, sexual rumors, code words, and race -oriented stories, as well as jokes of
a sexual or discriminatory nature or "kidding" which is oriented towards a prohibited form of
harassment.
2. Physical Harassment — Assault, impeding or blocking movement, leering, or the physical
interference with normal work, privacy or movement when directed at an individual on the
basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age (40 and over) and disability. This
includes pinching, patting, grabbing, inappropriate behavior in or near bathrooms, sleeping
facilities and eating areas, or making explicit or implied threats or promises in return for
submission to physical acts.
3. Visual Forms of Harassment — Derogatory, prejudicial, stereotypical or otherwise
offensive posters, photographs, cartoons, e-mails, notes, bulletins, drawings or pictures on
the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age (40 and over) and disability. This
applies to both posted material and material maintained in or on City equipment or personal
property in the workplace.
4. Sexual Harassment — Any act which is sexual in nature and is made explicitly or implicitly
a term or condition of employment, is used as the basis of an employment decision,
unreasonably interferes with an individual's work performance or creates an intimidating,
hostile or offensive work environment.
There are basically two types of sexual harassment:
a. "Quid pro quo" harassment, where submission to unlawful harassment is used as
the basis for employment decisions.
Employee benefits such as raises, promotions, better working hours, job retention,
etc., are directly linked to compliance with sexual advances. Therefore, only
someone in a supervisory capacity (with the authority to grant such benefits) can
engage in quid pro quo harassment. Example: A supervisor promising an
employee a raise if she goes on a date with him; a manager telling an employee
she will fire him if he does not have sex with her.
b. "Hostile work environment," where the unlawful harassment creates an offensive
and unpleasant working environment.
Hostile work environment can be created by anyone in the work environment,
whether it be supervisors, other employees, or the public. Hostile environment
harassment consists of verbiage of a sexual nature, unwelcome sexual materials,
or even unwelcome physical contact as a regular part of the work environment.
Cartoons or posters of a sexual nature, vulgar or lewd comments or jokes, or
unwanted touching or fondling all fall into this category.
E. COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
The following complaint procedure will be followed in order to address a complaint regarding
harassment, discrimination, or retaliation:
1. A person who believes he/she has been unlawfully harassed, discriminated or retaliated
against should report it to their supervisor, Department Head, Mayor, Human Resource
Officer, or legal counsel for the City. If a supervisor becomes aware that unlawful
harassment or discrimination is occurring in any city department as a result of an
employee coming forward, the supervisor should immediately report it to a designated
official pursuant to this policy. Once a complaint of unlawful harassment, discrimination
or retaliation has been made, the complaint cannot be withdrawn by the complainant
without a determination that is was made erroneously.
2. Promptly upon receiving the complaint, the Designated Official should initiate the
investigation to determine whether there is a reasonable basis for believing that an
alleged violation of this Policy occurred.
3. Upon receiving the complaint, or being advised by a supervisor that violation of this policy
may be occurring, the Designated Official should review the complaint with the City
Attorney, the Human Resource Officer or Mayor.
4. The Designated Official, in conjunction with legal counsel for the City, should engage an
appropriate person to investigate the complaint. The investigator should be a neutral
party.
5. The investigator will interview the complainant, the respondent, and any relevant
witnesses to determine whether the conduct occurred.
6. As soon as practical, the investigator will conclude the investigation and submit a report
of his or her findings to the Designated Official, who then will route it as appropriate.
7. If it is determined that unlawful harassment or discrimination in violation of the City's
policy has occurred, the appropriate official will recommend the appropriate course of
action to be taken by the City. The appropriate action will depend on the following
factors:
a. The severity, frequency and pervasiveness of the conduct;
b. Prior complaints made by the complainant;
c. Prior complaints made against the respondent; and
d. The quality of the evidence (first hand knowledge, credible corroboration,
etc.).
8. If the investigation is inconclusive or it is determined that there has been no unlawful
harassment or discrimination in violation of this Policy, but some potentially problematic
conduct is revealed, corrective action may be taken.
9. Promptly after the investigation is concluded, the supervisor(s) will meet with the
complainant and the respondent separately in order to notify them in person of the
findings of the investigation.
10. The complainant and the respondent may submit statements to the supervisor(s)
challenging the factual basis of the findings. Any such statement must be submitted no
later than five (5) working days after the meeting with the supervisor(s) in which the
findings of the investigation is discussed.
11. Promptly after the supervisor(s) has met with both parties and reviewed the
documentation, he or she will decide, after consultation with legal counsel, what action, if
any, should be taken.
F. DISCIPLINARY ACTION
If unlawful harassment is determined to have occurred, the supervisor should take prompt and
effective remedial action against the harasser. The action should be commensurate with the
severity of the offense, up to and including termination of employment.
G. RETALIATION
Retaliation in any manner against a person for filing an harassment charge or initiating an
harassment complaint, testifying in an investigation, providing information or assisting in an
investigation, is expressly prohibited and subject to disciplinary action up to and including
termination. The supervisor, Department Head and Mayor should take reasonable steps to
protect the victim and other potential victims from further harassment or related consequences.
H. CONFIDENTIALITY
Confidentiality will be maintained to the fullest extent possible in accordance with applicable
Federal, State and local law. However, a complete and thorough investigation of the allegations
will require the investigator to inform witnesses of certain aspects of the complaint in order to
obtain an accurate account of the actions of the parties involved.
I. FALSE COMPLAINTS
Any complaint made by an employee of the City regarding employment -based harassment which
is conclusively proven to be false, should result in discipline. This discipline may include
termination of employment. This section is not intended to discourage employees from making
complaints regarding employment -based harassment. However, false complaints adversely
impact the workplace and the career of the accused, even when disproved, and will not be
tolerated.
J. DISTRIBUTION
Access to this policy shall be provided to all employees, supervisors and Elected Officials of the
City either by paper or electronic copy. Any questions, concerns or comments related to this
policy should be directed to the Department Head, Human Resource Officer, Mayor, or City
Attorney.
The position of the Mayor is appointed as the Designated Official for the purposes of this Policy.
r%
APPENDIX "A"
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF THE CITY OF IONA HARASSMENT POLICY
acknowledge receipt of the
Personnel Policy, adopted on
I understand that it is my responsibility to read and review this Policy.
I understand that I am obligated to perform my duties of employment in conformance with
the provisions of this Harassment Policy Manual and any additional rules, regulations,
policies or procedures imposed by the department in which I work whether or not I
choose to read the new Policy.
I understand that this Policy may be modified without prior notice to me.
I understand that should this Policy be modified that I will be provided with a copy of the
modifications.
I understand that this Policy may be provided to me in either paper format or by electronic
access.
DATED this
day of , 20
(Employee)
I, , provided a copy (either electronically or by
paper) of the City Harassment Policy, as adopted by the City Council on to
, on this day of , 20
(Name - Title - Department)
CITY OF IONA
VEHICLE USE POLICY
Approved by the Mayor and City Council
January 19_, 2012
1
1) PURPOSE
A. This Policy outlines the use of vehicles for work used on behalf of the City of Iona (City).
B. Operators of City -owned or leased motor vehicles shall always drive safely, legally and
courteously, remembering that they are directly responsible for maintaining both City -
owned property and public trust.
C. Employees are expected to operate vehicles safely. It is the policy of the City to provide
a safe working environment that protects our employees and our citizens from injury and
property loss. The City considers the use of vehicles part of the working environment.
The City is committed to safe responsible employee driving behavior that reduces the
risk of personal injury and property loss.
D. This policy applies to all employees and agency volunteers* who operate vehicles on
agency business. These drivers will be referred to as "employee drivers" and will be
reviewed by managers and supervisors to ensure full implementation and compliance.
*Volunteers are those that volunteer on a regular basis, not one-time volunteers.
2) USE
A. Vehicles owned or leased by the City are to be used for the functions of the City.
Personal use or any other type of use must be authorized by the governing board.
B. The Mayor is entrusted with the care and keeping of the vehicles and may assign that
responsibility to an employee.
C. Some employees may be assigned a vehicle that is driven home; such personal use, if
allowed, may be a taxable benefit.
Agency Owned Vehicles
Vehicles:
Employees must be authorized by their supervisor to operate an agency vehicle.
Vehicles over 26,000 gross vehicle weight, Buses, and Vans over 15
passengers
require a commercial driver's license (CDL).
3) ASSIGNED OR PERMISSIVE DRIVERS
A. Each employee assigned to a City vehicle or employees who operate a City fleet vehicle
are required to have a valid driver's license. Should an employee's Driver's License
expire, be revoked or suspended, the employee shall immediately notify his or her
supervisor. At the time of the suspension, the employee's City vehicle -use privileges will
be suspended until the employee's Driver's License has been fully restored and
validated.
B. In addition to the employee assigned or permitted to drive a City vehicle, he or she may
allow others, as necessary, to operate the vehicle if they have a valid driver's license
and are 25 years of age or older.
2
C. Each employee assigned or permitted to operate a City vehicle shall be responsible for
the following:
1. Proper and safe operation of the vehicle;
2. Service and maintain the vehicle in accordance with the manufacturer's
recommendations;
3. Maintain vehicle registration, license plates and inspections; and
4. Participate in vehicle safety and defensive driving training as required by City.
4) SEATBELT USE
Except as authorized herein, all drivers and passengers are required to utilize seatbelts as
mandated by law. Exception: Sworn law enforcement officers may dispense with
wearing safety restraints in specific tactical situations or when it reasonably appears
that, due to unusual circumstances, wearing a seatbelt would hinder rather than increase
safety (Idaho Code 49-673(2)(b)).
5) MOBILE COMMUNICATION DEVICE, CELL PHONE AND COMPUTER USE
The driver of a City vehicle, or any other vehicle being used for City business, is
prohibited from using a mobile communication device, cell phone or computer of any type
while the vehicle is in motion. Drivers must be safely parked before using phone or mobile
computer equipment. A mobile communication device is defined as "a text messaging
device or a wireless, two-way communication device designed to receive and transmit voice
or text communication". This does not apply to City work -related two-way radios.
Exception: Sworn law enforcement officers may use mobile communication devices in
specific tactical situations.
6) SMOKING PROHIBITED IN VEHICLES
Smoking is expressly prohibited in all City vehicles.
7) IMPAIRED DRIVING
The driver must not operate a vehicle when his/her ability to do so is impaired or influenced
by: alcohol, illegal drugs or other illegal substances, prescribed or over-the-counter
medication, or illness, fatigue or injury.
The employee driver is obligated to report to his/her supervisor any reason that may affect
his/her ability to drive safely.
8) PROOF OF INSURANCE
Employee drivers must make sure that the current insurance card is kept in the vehicle at all
times.
9) ACCIDENT REPORTING
A. In the event of an accident, the driver shall, when possible, first check on the safety and
welfare of all persons involved and seek immediate medical attention should it be
3
required for themselves or others. If possible, move the vehicle to a safe location out of
the way of traffic.
B. Drivers shall always have a police officer investigate any accident that involves a City
vehicle. This will help ensure that City is protected from unwarranted claims. Do not
discuss fault with, or sign anything from anyone except for a police officer, a
representative from ICRMP or an authorized representative of City.
C. Drivers shall notify their supervisor as soon as possible of the accident and report the
extent of the injuries and property damage involved.
D. Drivers shall cooperate fully with ICRMP Claims Department in the handling of the claim.
10) TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS
All fines and other criminal penalties due to violations of the law by the driver are the
personal responsibility of the driver of any City vehicle. These costs are not reimbursable by
City and must be paid promptly by the driver.
11) VEHICLE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
A. If the City vehicle is in need of repairs, the vehicle should be taken to an appropriate
location for repair.
B. Prior to scheduling major repairs or major maintenance needs, the driver must advise
the Mayor or the designated employee for approval and any further instructions.
4
VEHICLE ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of an agency -owned or agency insured vehicle. I
understand that this vehicle is to be regularly maintained and serviced, according to the service schedule
outlined in the owner's manual or the instructions issued by the Fleet Safety Coordinator, whichever is
appropriate.
Further, it is agreed this vehicle will be operated in a safe manner and in compliance with this policy. I
agree to be responsible for all traffic and parking violations that occur while the vehicle is assigned to me.
I understand articles of this agreement apply regardless of who is operating this vehicle.
I agree to promptly report all accidents or incidents resulting in injury or damage to the vehicle or other
property, no matter how slight.
I understand I am required to maintain a valid driver's license. Further, I herewith grant the Mayor the
right to investigate my driver's license record any time. My current drivers license is issued from the State
of and is License Number
I understand the operation of this vehicle in a safe operating condition is my responsibility. If this vehicle
becomes unsafe, it is my responsibility to notify my supervisors immediately.
I have read and agree to the provisions of this vehicle assignment agreement and the requirements of the
Vehicle Use Policy.
Print Full Name
Signature
5
piN
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF CITY VEHICLE USE POLICY.
acknowledge receipt of the Vehicle Use
Policy, adopted on
Please initial each statement below if it is true.
I understand that it is my responsibility to read and understand the contents of this Policy.
I understand that I am obligated to perform my duties of employment in conformance with the
provisions of this Policy and any additional rules, regulations, policies or procedures imposed by the
department in which I work whether or not I choose to read the Policy.
I understand that this Policy may be modified without prior notice to me.
I understand that should this Policy be modified that I will be provided with a copy of the
modification.
DATED this
day of , 20
(Employee)
, provided a copy (either electronically or by paper) of
the City of lona's Vehicle Use Policy, as adopted by the City Council on to
, on this day of
,20
(Name - Title - Department)
ORDINANCE NO. (c6,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO;
ADOPTING REGULATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE
OPERATION AND USE OF PUBLIC PARKS; PROHIBITING
THE USE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PARKS;
ESTABLISHING CLOSING HOURS FOR PUBLIC PARKS;
REQUIRING ALL DOGS TO BE KEPT ON A LEASH;
REQUIRING OWNERS TO REMOVE DOG FECES
DEPOSITED IN A PUBLIC PARK; PROHIBITING DOMESTIC
ANIMALS IN A PUBLIC PARK; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IONA,
IDAHO THAT:
Section 1. Adoption of Section 8-1-5, Iona City Code. Section 8-1-5 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows:
8-1-5: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PROHIBITED:
(A) The terms defined below shall have the following meanings when used in this
section:
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE: Beer, wine or liquor.
BEER: Any beverage obtained by the alcoholic fermentation of an infusion or
decoction of barley, malt or other ingredients in drinkable water and which contains
not more than four percent (4%) alcohol by weight.
LIQUOR: All kinds of liquor sold by and in a state liquor store of the State of Idaho.
STATE LIQUOR STORE: Any liquor store or distributor established under and
pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho for the package sale of liquor at retail.
WINE: Any beverage containing not more than fourteen percent (14%) alcohol by
volume obtained by the fermentation of the natural sugar content of fruits or other
agricultural products containing sugar whether or not other ingredients are added.
(B) Any person who possesses any alcoholic beverage while in any public park, public
outdoor recreation area or facility or any public parking lot adjacent thereto, is guilty
of a misdemeanor.
-1-
(C) Notwithstanding section (B) hereof, beer may be possessed and consumed in any
public park within the premises designated for any person holding a retail beer or
wine license to sell or dispense beer or wine within such park. The boundaries of
such premises shall be conspicuously posted by such licensee or by the City upon
or near such premises. Nothing in this section shall prohibit such retail licensee or
his agents, employees or suppliers from transporting beer or wine to the premises
for sale or disposition.
Section 2. Adoption of Section 8-1-6, Iona City Code. Section 8-1-6 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows:
8-1-6: HOURS OF OPERATION: Any person who enters or is found to be present
in any public park between the hours of 12:00 o'clock midnight and 5:00 o'clock a.m. is
guilty of an infraction.
Section 3. Adoption of Section 8-1-7, Iona City Code. Section 8-1-7 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows:
8-1-7: DOGS ON LEASH: It shall be unlawful for any owner or custodian of any dog
to permit or allow such dog to run at large within a public park. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Mayor may, upon application of any person, authorize dog shows,
exhibitions and dog training courses to be held within a public park and where the dogs
participating therein are controlled by competent attendants. The Mayor may also
designate an area within a public park which may be used, subject to such rules and
regulations as may be prescribed, for the training or exercise of dogs. Dogs within such
areas need not be controlled by leash, but shall be under the control of a responsible
person and controlled by whistle, voice or other effective command. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, nothing herein shall preclude use of a licensed service dog within a public park,
providing the dog is kept on a leash or under the affective control of the owner by voice
command, whistle or other restraint at all times.
Section 4. Adoption of Section 8-1-8, Iona City Code. Section 8-1-8 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows:
8-1-8: DOG DEFECATION TO BE REMOVED BY DOG OWNER.
(A) No person owning, keeping or having in his or her immediate care or custody any
dog shall knowingly fail or neglect to immediately clean up any feces of the dog and
dispose of it in a sanitary manner, whenever the dog has defecated in a public park.
(B) The provisions of subsection (A) of this section shall not apply to a blind or disabled
person accompanied by a guide dog, signal dog or other service animal.
-2-
Section 5. Adoption of Section 8-1-9, Iona City Code. Section 8-1-9 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows:
8-1-9: ANIMALS IN PARKS PROHIBITED: It shall be unlawful for the owner or
custodian of any domestic or feral animal, other than a domestic dog or cat, to permit or
allow such animal to enter or be present upon or within any public park.
Section 6. Severability. The sections and subsections of this Ordinance are
severable. The invalidity of any section or subsection shall not affect the validity of the
remaining sections or subsections.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon its
passage, execution and publication in the manner provided by law.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
, 2012.
ATTEST:
Robyn Keyes
City Clerk
(SEAL)
-3-
Brad Andersen
Mayor
STATE OF IDAHO )
)ss.
County of Bonneville )
I, ROBYN KEYES, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Ordinance
entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO; ADOPTING REGULATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO THE OPERATION AND USE OF PUBLIC PARKS; PROHIBITING
THE USE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PARKS; ESTABLISHING CLOSING
HOURS FOR PUBLIC PARKS; REQUIRING ALL DOGS TO BE KEPT ON A LEASH;
REQUIRING OWNERS TO REMOVE DOG FECES DEPOSITED IN A PUBLIC PARK;
PROHIBITING DOMESTIC ANIMALS IN A PUBLIC PARK; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE."
G:\WPDATA\DWS\2708 City of Iona\ORD\Park 101..ORD.v1 napd:sm
Robyn Keyes
City Clerk
-4-
(C) Notwithstanding section (B) hereof, beer may be possessed and consumed in any
public park within the premises designated for any person holding a retail beer or
wine license to sell or dispense beer or wine within such park. The boundaries of
such premises shall be conspicuously posted by such licensee or by the City upon
or near such premises. Nothing in this section shall prohibit such retail licensee or
his agents, employees or suppliers from transporting beer or wine to the premises
for sale or disposition.
Section 2. Adoption of Section 8-1-6, Iona City Code. Section 8-1-6 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows:
8-1-6: HOURS OF OPERATION: Any person who enters or is found to be present
in any public park between the hours of 12:00 o'clock midnight and 5:00 o'clock a.m. is
guilty of an infraction.
Section 3. Adoption of Section 8-1-7, lona City Code. Section 8-1-7 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows:
8-1-7: DOGS ON LEASH: It shall be unlawful for any owner or custodian of any dog
to permit or allow such dog to run at large within a public park.: Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Mayor may, upon application of any person, authorize dog shows,
exhibitions and dog training courses to be held within a public park and where the dogs
participating therein are controlled by competent attendants. The Mayor may also
designate an area within a public park which may be used, subject to such rules and
regulations as may be prescribed, for the training or exercise of dogs. Dogs within such
areas need not be controlled by leash, but shall be under the control of a responsible
person and controlled by whistle, voice or other effective command. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, nothing herein shall preclude use of a licensed service dog within a public park,
providing the dog is kept on a leash or under the affective control of the owner by voice
command, whistle or other restraint at all times.
Section 4. Adoption of Section 8-1-8, Iona City Code. Section 8-1-8 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows
8-1-8: DOG DEFECATION TO BE REMOVED BY DOG OWNER.
(A) No person owning, keeping or having in his or her immediate care or custody any
dog shall knowingly fail or neglect to immediately clean up any feces of the dog and
dispose of it in a sanitary manner, whenever the. dog has defecated in a public park.
(B) The provisions of subsection (A) of this section shall not apply to a blind or disabled
person accompanied by a guide dog, signal dog or other service animal.
-2-
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO;
ADOPTING REGULATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE
OPERATION AND USE OF PUBLIC PARKS; PROHIBITING
THE USE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PARKS;
ESTABLISHING CLOSING HOURS FOR PUBLIC PARKS;
REQUIRING ALL DOGS TO BE KEPT ON A LEASH;
REQUIRING OWNERS TO REMOVE DOG FECES
DEPOSITED IN A PUBLIC PARK; PROHIBITING DOMESTIC
ANIMALS IN A PUBLIC PARK; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IONA,
IDAHO THAT:
Section 1. Adoption of Section 8-1-5, Iona City Code. Section 8-1-5 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows:
8-1-5: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PROHIBITED:
(A) The terms defined below shall have the following meanings when used in this
section:
(B)
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE: Beer, wine or liquor.
BEER: Any beverage obtained by the alcoholic fermentation of an infusion or
decoction of barley, malt or other ingredients in drinkable water and which contains
not more than four percent (4%) alcohol by weight.
LIQUOR: All kinds of liquor sold by and in a state liquor store of the State of Idaho.
STATE LIQUOR STORE: Any liquor store or distributor established under and
pursuant to the laws of the State of Idaho for the package sale of liquor at retail.
WINE: Any beverage containing not more than fourteen percent (14%) alcohol by
volume obtained by the fermentation of the natural sugar content of fruits or other
agricultural products containing sugar whether or not other ingredients are added.
Any person who possesses any alcoholic beverage while in any public park, public
outdoor recreation area or facility or any public parking lot adjacent thereto, is guilty
of a misdemeanor.
-1-
Lod-
Lit
Section 5. Adoption of Section 8-1-9, lona City Code. Section 8-1-9 of the City
Code of Iona, Idaho, is adopted as follows:
8-1-9: ANIMALS IN PARKS PROHIBITED: It shall be unlawful for the owner or
custodian of any domestic or feral animal, other than a domestic dog, to permit or allow
such animal to enter or be present upon or within any public park.
Section 6. Severabiiity. The sections and subsections of this Ordinance are
severable. The invalidity of any section or subsection shall not affect the validity of the
remaining sections or subsections.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon its
passage, execution and publication in the manner provided by law.
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
, 2012.
ATTEST:
Robyn Keyes
City Clerk
(SEAL)
Brad Andersen
Mayor
e- (-1 5/ . ,,e0 S R4 i 5 -J/4-/ C5
l SreXS o rifT-S
-3-
STATE OF IDAHO )
)ss.
County of Bonneville
I, ROBYN KEYES, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO, DO ' EREBY
CERTIFY:
That the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct co • of the Ordinance
entitled,"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO; AD • •TING REGULATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO THE OPERATION AND USE OF PU: IC PARKS; PROHIBITING
THE USE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC " KS; ESTABLISHING CLOSING
HOURS FOR PUBLIC PARKS; REQUIRING ALL OGS TO BE KEPT ON A LEASH;
REQUIRING OWNERS TO REMOVE DOG F'CES DEPOSITED IN A PUBLIC PARK;
PROHIBITING DOMESTIC ANIMALS A PUBLIC PARK; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING N EFFECTIVE DATE."
i
G:\WPDATA\DWS\2708 City of bale\ORD\Park Rules.ORD.vl.wpd:sm
Robyn Keyes
City Clerk
-4-
CITIZENS WATCH PROGRAM IN IONA
What Idaho Falls Police Department Has
- 25 Volunteers each working minimum of 10 hours/month
- Active Members must first go through Citizens Academy/ride-along program/background check
to even be considered to be on this program
- Citizens Academy is 2 hrs/week for 10 weeks of training/familiarization then ride -along program
with officers/citizen patrol then evaluation/field training done with each new member to make
sure they are capable of the job on their own
- 3 Patrol Vehicles equipped with yellow lighting
CWP Program has been in effect for 10 years in Idaho Falls
Meet twice a month for meetings/training
- CWP Program has President and VP that coordinate meetings/training each month
- Hal Rapp is the acting president, they are almost completely self sufficient
- They equipment each volunteer with uniform
- Items they assist with is wide ranging including but not limited to abandoned vehicles, traffic
control, attend events held by city to assist, public relation issues, basic first responder items
such as CPR and assessing accident scenes, active patrolling for visual deterrence if they are
closest unit or until law enforcement arrives and a wide array of other items
IFPD extremely appreciates the work these volunteers do
Cost To Look At To Incorporate This Program
- Re -equip Tahoe with vehicle radio and switch out light colors from blue/red/white to amber
($4000)
- Portable radio/charger/belt holder ($3000)
Uniforms such as shirts for each volunteer ($200 then est. $100 each year after)
- First Responders equipment in vehicle ($1000 then est. $300 each year after)
- Fuel cost of patrolling estimated 10 hrs/week ($2500/year)
- Oil changes/repairs for upkeep of Tahoe ($600-$800/year)
Cost to allow our volunteers to work along IFPD's program/training (est. $500-$1000/year)
End Results
Upfront Cost Estimate
Continued Annual Cost Estimate
$8700
$4700