HomeMy Public PortalAboutAPP 99-3TOWN OF GULF STREAi.
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
AUIJi1AiW- 416101 :U&S
WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR., Mayor
JOAN K ORTHW EIN, Vice Mayor
FRED B. DEVITT III
ROBERT W. HOPKINS If
WILLIAM A. LYNCH
March 17, 1999
Karin Lewis TTEE
7321 N.W. 44th Lane
Coconut Creek, Florida 33073
Dear Mrs. Lewis:
C; p
Telephone
(561) 276 -5116
Fax
=;.���, •_ 3'
(561) 737 -0188
Town Manager
KRISTIN KERN GARRISON
= -
�'•f _ : ':r.'�
Town Clerk
RITA L. TAYLOR
This is to confirm that at the regular meeting of the Town Commission
held on March 12, 1999, your application for a Level 3 Architectural/
Site Plan Review to permit the construction of a two -story single
family home on the vacant property located at 925 Emerald Row, Gulf
Stream, Florida, legally described as Lot 63 in Plance Au Soleil
Subdivision, was considered.
The Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review was approved as presented
and recommended by the Architectural Review and Planning Board with
the revised East Elevation dated February 22, 1999 with the following
conditions: 1) The wooden fence is to be replaced with a fence that
is more compatible with the shape of the lot and architecture of the
home, and the installation should be made in coordination with the
neighbor to the west as much as possible; 2) The septic system must
be approved by the Palm Beach County Health Unit prior to issuance of
a building permit.
If a building permit is not obtained, including the aforementioned
improvements, within one year of approval date, your Level 3 Site
Plan Review will automatically expire.
Very truly ours,
Rita L. Taylor
Town Clerk
cc: Hawk Fulwider & Assoc.
100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA 33483
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING STAFF REPORT
Application #: 99 -3
Address: 925 Emerald Row
Owner: Karen Lewis, TTEE
Agent: Jim Fulwider, Architect
Proposed Improvement: Construction of a two -story 5,821 S.F. home. The floor plan
shows 5 bedrooms, 4 -1/2 baths, den, family room, dining room,
porte - cochere, and three -car garage, along with a swimming pool
at the rear /north side of the home. Brick and beige stucco are
shown for the principal building, with beige trim and a slate —
colored tile roof.
Approvals Requested:
Special Exception(s): N/A
Variances: N/A
Lot size: 17,690 S.F.
Permitted Floor Area: 5,839 S.F.
Zoning District: RS -F (Fringe)
Architectural /Site Plan Review, Level 3
Proposed Total Floor Area: 5,821 S.F.
Proposed Height: 20' max. (> 20' preferred)
Proposed Architectural Style: The owners refer to this style as "English/Georgian"
Adjacent Residences: Adjacent to the east is a two -story "other various style" home with a metal roof,
to the west is a one -story G.S. Bermuda home.
Potential Issues Considered during Review: Scale and massing
Staff Recommendation:
Motion to Approve a Level III Architectural/Site Plan Review, based on a finding that the proposed
home is consistent with applicable review standards, with the following condition:
a. The wooden fence is to be replaced with a fence that is more compatible with the shape of the lot
and architecture of the home. The installation should be made in coordination with the neighbor to the
west as much as possible.
Basis for Recommendation:
In response to information received at the pre - application meeting, the plans have been revised to
lower the building height and significantly decrease the Floor Area of the home. The size, setbacks,
height and windows are consistent with the Design Manual.
The architectural style is not currently prevalent in Gulf Stream. However, the Place Au Soleil
subdivision already has mix of architectural styles including Ranch, Tudor, Mediterranean, and
Bermuda. Thus, the Georgian-type home, being traditional in style, should be compatible with homes
currently in the neighborhood. Also, a quick survey of homes on nearby streets showed several others
with brick facades.
The Place Au Soleil Home Owners Association Board of Directors has reviewed these plans and has
granted architectural approval with the following modifications requested:
a. The east elevation should be modified to add detail, such as brick lintel and keystone detail
or shutters.
b. The wooden fence is to be replaced with a chain link fence (black or bronze color) that
improves the water views of the neighbor to the west as much as possible.
ARPB # 99 -3, Page 1
It should also be noted that the proposal incorporates a paver - material circular drive in front of the
home (actual material not yet determined), and a substantial amount of new landscaping is proposed in
front of and behind the home.
The lot has a non - conforming boatlift, which will continue to be used by the new property owner. (The
lift is nonconforming because it is attached to a dock rather than the seawall.)
Requirements to be met prior to Building Permit Application:
1. The septic system must be approved by the Palm Beach County Heath Unit prior to issuance of a
building permit.
ARPB Date: February 25, 1999
ARPB Action: Recommended approval including revised east elevation submitted at the meeting,
subject to one condition Vote: 4 -0
Commission Date: March 12, 1999
ARPB # 99 -3, Page 2
Action: 1�fWVal av-- k'h*
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
FORM ADA.592
This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream
Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and /or Town Commission. To complete
the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application
for Development Review Form ADA.592. Failure to complete this form properly will delay Its
consideration.
ARPB File #
PART I. GENERAL INFORMATION
To be completed by all applicants prior to pre- application conference with Town staff.
A. Project Information
I.A.1. Project /Owner Name: K.AJlA LJE LAIED 7
I.A.2. Project Location: ftZ6 r2.CL)
I.A.3. Project Description:_- JI r 1aaA L �'� t►_
I.A.4. Project Property Legal Description:
2.11
I.A.S. Project Property Size in Acres and Square Feet: kJ (gyp �"�,
B. Owner Information
1.B.1. Owner Name & Signature:_Lt_r'i✓\ �CwiS 1 'ICE
1.B.2. Owner Address: gall A) (,J
I.B.3. Owner Phone Number: JC 59 y
COf- OyLU.t
5�-4 -�SOb
C. Agent Information J I ri f 4w %om_
I.C.1. Agent Name, Signature and Firm: LY_ C
I.C.2. Agent Ad
I.C.3. Agent Phi
►_L 3303
5 i A( A -- f .
�t , /ACf/ %/ y
-q /l _ zo 9
Pre -App Date
App Date
Com Date ,
Off lcial Use Only
ARPB D. -
41
.T
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.592 Page 1
Town of Gulf Stream
PART II. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
To be completed by Town staff during pre - application conference.
A. Review and Approval Processes
❑ 1. A1A Vegetative Disturbance Permit ❑ 9. Sign Review
❑ 2. Administrative Appeal t,00- Site Plan Review
❑ 3. Annexation Review ❑ 11. Site Plan Revision
❑ 4. Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Review �12. Special Exception Review
11 5. Demolition Permit ❑ 13. Subdivision Review
❑ 6. Future Land Use Map Change Review ❑ 14. Variance Review
❑ 7. Land Clearing Permit ❑ 15. Zoning Code Text Amendment Review
❑ 8. Rezoning Review ❑ 16. (other)
B. Application Materials
Required/
Recommended
Number of
Copies*
Application Material
..........:::::
1. Completed Development Application
2. Fee of $
1-7
3. General Location Map
4. Site Plan
/-I S"
5. Building Elevations
6-3-
6. Floor Plans
1
7. Roof Plan
8. Perspective
9. Color Rendering
/-f
10. Drainage Plan
%
11. Landscape Plan
12. Septic Tank Permit
r„ /A-
13. DOT Driveway Permit
1✓/1-1-
14. DOT Landscape Permit
r % 7
15. Survey
16. Subdivision Plat
/i
17. Concurrency Documents
/
18. Proof of Ownership ✓�,v
19. Agent Affidavit
20. Adjacent Property Owners
,
21. Property Owners within 25'
22. Property Owners within 300'
23.
24.
25.
*NOTE: Where multiple copies of a drawing are required, -®e copy shall be an original full -size
drawing which is signed and sealed. All other copies shall be reduced to 11"x17" or as specified by
Town staff. Please refer to the instruction manual for more detailed information.
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.592
Page 2
Town of Gulf Stream
PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION
To be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town staff. Please be concise but
brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and complete
question number for each response.
�A_ Project Description and Justification
III.A.1. Describe the exact nature of the project. L W4
2 S 7&Y
III.A.2. In what zoning district is the project site located? uL . Aq�'
III.A.3. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district? Yes ❑ No
Explain.
III.A.4. What is the Future Land Use designation of the project site?
III.A.5. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Map and goals, obje ives and polic s of the
Comprehensive Plan? Yes ❑ No
Explain.
III.A.6. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? G► DI'Lt
III.A.7. How are the following utilities to be provided to the property?
a. Stormwater Drainage vq:4& 9;-1 ,1t„�
b. Sanitary Sewer
c. Potable Water_ �Cc,
d. Irrigation Water_ �n
e. Electricity
f. Telephone
g. Gas_ i4p
h. Cable Television
III.A.8. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures
are consistent with the criteria provided in Ordinance 91/12 Section B.2.b.
III.A.9. If the project involves a rezoning, Zoning Code text change, Future Land Use Map change,
Comprehensive Plan text change, or any combination thereof, please describe the need and
justification for the request.
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.592
Page 3
Town of Gulf Stream
PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town staff. Answering
Yes to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated.
A. Additional Requirements
IV.A.1. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the Al (North Ocean Boulevard) right -
of -way? ❑ Yes C(No
(If "Yes ", section B of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? ❑ Yes dNo
(If "Yes ", section C of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or filling of any portion of an existing va ant lot or more than
fifty percent (50 %) of the landscaped area of a developed lot? ❑ Yes Ur
(If "Yes ", section D of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.4. Does the project involve non - residential uses or more than two (2) residential units? ❑ Yes 0<0
(if "Yes ", section E of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.5. Does the project require approval of a Special Exception? ❑ Yes I21"No
(if "Yes ", section F of this part must be completed.)
IV.A.6. Is the project at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? ❑ Yes VNo
(If "Yes ", section G of this part must be completed.)
Projects Requiring an Al A (North Ocean Boulevard) Vegetative Disturbance Permit
IV.B.1. What significant landscape features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent?
IV.B.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance /addition.
IV.B.3. Will the disturbance /addition destroy or seriously impair desirable visual relationships among
buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or
plant material that destroy or impair significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard
Overlay District? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Explain.
IV. B.4. What mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance /addition has the least impact possible to the
visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District?
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.592 Page 4
Town of Gulf Stream
Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit
IV.C.1. When are the existing structures to be demolished?
IV.C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed?
IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished?
Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit
IV-D-1. Describe those vegetative materials of 4 inches in diameter and greater to be removed /relocated.
IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal /relocation.
IV-D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated?
IV.D.4. How are remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the
land clearing and construction activities and thereafter?
Non- Residential Projects and Residential Projects of Greater than 2 Units
IV.E.1. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how they are to be maintained.
IV.E.2. If recreation facilities are to be provided, describe them and their potential impacts on surrounding
properties.
IV.E.3. For each of the following, list the number provided and their dimensions.
Loading Spaces:
Standard Parking Spaces:
Small Car Parking Spaces:
Handicapped Parking Spaces:
Driveways /Aisles:
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.592 Page 5
Town of Gulf Stream
f" -� F. Projects Requiring a Special Exception.
IV.F.1. Is the proposed use a permitted special exception use? ❑ Yes ❑ No
IV.F.2. How is the use designed, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety,
welfare, and morals will be protected?
IV.F.3. Will the use cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it
is to be located? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Explain.
IV.FA How will the use be compatible with adjoining development and the character of the District where
it is to be located?
IV.F.5. What landscaping and screening are provided?
IV.F.6. Are adequate off - street parking and loading space provided? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Explain.
IV.F.7. How are ingress and egress designed so as to cause minimum interference with traffic on
abutting streets?
IV.F.8. Does the use conform with all applicable regulations governing the District wherein it is to be
located? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Explain.
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.592 Page 6
Town of Gulf Stream
"'PG. Projects Requiring a Variance
IV.G.1. From what specific Zoning Code regulation is a variance requested?
IV.G.2. What does the Zoning Code require for this specific site?
IV-G.3. What is proposed?
IV.G.4. What is the total variance requested?
IV.G.5. What special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or
building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same
zoning district?
IV.G.6. Did the special conditions and circumstances result from the actions of the applicant?
❑ Yes ❑No
Explain.
IV.G.7. Will granting the variance confer upon the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the
Zoning Code to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Explain.
IV.G.8. How would a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant
of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the same terms
of the ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant?
IV.G.9. Is the variance requested the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of
land, building, or structure? ❑ Yes ❑No
Explain.
IV.G.10. Will the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and
not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Expl
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.592 Page 7
Town of Gulf Stream
PART V. OPTIONAL INFORMATION
This entire Part is optional for all applicants. Applicants are encouraged, but not required, to provide any
additional relevant information regarding the project that was not covered elsewhere on this form or on any
of the other materials submitted with the application.
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.592 Page 8
TOWN OF GULF STREAM SITE DATA TABLE
Gross Lot Area
'7 (40R ce
Effective Lot Area
Lo
Calculations
m)
EXISTING
DEMO
NEW
NET
1 Floor Laving
Ceiling over 15'
2 Floor Living,
Total Living
W Is IP4-
lgl Floor Covered
4
2 floor Covered
Total Covered
Garage,
Gross Floor Area
S e V
Out Buildings
,,....
"Total FAR Proposed
First 20,000 X.33
Over 20,000 X.20
,.•••
Total Allowable FAR
Per Manual
Total Rardscape Area
Required Landscape
Area (40%)
Actual % Open Space
/Landscape Area
t I
Hawk, Fulwider and Associates, ;m
201 N. Federal Hwy • Suite 107
Deerfield Beach, F!. 33441
i
i
I
I�1 �
COLONIAL HOUSES
Georgian
1700 -1780; locally to ca. 1830
cornice usUan
emphasized
- -- tooth -like
windows with dentils 5 v
double -hung sashes, or other
typically with nine, molding
or twelve small - - -
panes per sash; — - — i`'
windows never '?::'
in adjacent pairs f; JDFNTIFYING FEATURES
Paneled front door, usually centered and capped by an elaborate decorative crown (en-
tablature) supported by decorative pilasters (flattened columns); usually with a row of
small rectangular panes of glass beneath the crown, either within the door or in a transom
, r just above; cornice usually emphasized by decorative moldings, most commonly with
D
-Y
tooth -like dentils; windows with double -hung sashes having many small panes (most
commonly nine or twelve panes per sash) separated by thick wooden muntins; windows
00 .^
aligned horizontally and vertically in symmetrical rows, never in adjacent pairs, usually
Paneled normally with " "'" five- ranked on front facade, less commonly three- or seven - ranked.
decorative crown
supported by row of small windows t
decorative pilasters rpicily - I 12►NCIPAL SUBTYPES
rectangular panes five ranked and
beneath crown symmetr;"Ily The Georgian house is usually a simple one- or two -story box, two rooms deep, with
with center door,
less common ly t
doors and windows in strict symmetry. Five principal subtypes can be distinguished:
hicam,
- - ranked or seven-ran
SIDE- GABLED ROOF —About 40 percent of surviving Georgian houses are of this type, which
A is the most common in the northern and middle colonies, but also occurs in the southern
colonies.
SIDE- CABLED ROOF
Pages 144-6
/ CENTERED GABLE
I
s
7
GAMBREL ROOF HIPPED ROOF
;T
Page 147
WB 4
TOWN HOUSE .'.
a,
n n
GAMBREL ROOF —This roof form is found primarily in the northern colonies where it is char-
acteristic of about z5 percent of surviving Georgian houses. Few gambrels survive in the
middle or southern colonies, although restoration research in Williamsburg indicates
they may have formerly been common on one -story southern examples. The shape is an
adaptation of the gable form which provides more attic space for storage or sleeping.
HIPPED ROOF —About 25 percent of surviving Georgian houses have hipped roofs (some are
dual - pitched hipped). This is the most common type in the southern colonies, but is not
unusual in the middle and northern colonies, where it occurs principally on high -style
landmark examples.
CENTERED GABLE —Less than to percent of surviving Georgian houses have a gable (pedi-
ment) centered on,the front facade. The facade beneath the gable may either remain in
the same plane as the rest of the wall or be extended slightly forward for emphasis as a
pavilion. This subtype became common only after 175o, and is found in high -style ex-
amples in all the former colonies.
TOWN HOUSE —The earliest surviving urban houses with narrow front facades and linear
Dlans dare frnm the nenrninn ner ;nd These were nrioinnlly hrrilr ;r, X11 rhP
.{..
COLONIAL HOUSES
Georgian
1700 -1780; locally to ca. 1830
cornice usUan
emphasized
- -- tooth -like
windows with dentils 5 v
double -hung sashes, or other
typically with nine, molding
or twelve small - - -
panes per sash; — - — i`'
windows never '?::'
in adjacent pairs f; JDFNTIFYING FEATURES
Paneled front door, usually centered and capped by an elaborate decorative crown (en-
tablature) supported by decorative pilasters (flattened columns); usually with a row of
small rectangular panes of glass beneath the crown, either within the door or in a transom
, r just above; cornice usually emphasized by decorative moldings, most commonly with
D
-Y
tooth -like dentils; windows with double -hung sashes having many small panes (most
commonly nine or twelve panes per sash) separated by thick wooden muntins; windows
00 .^
aligned horizontally and vertically in symmetrical rows, never in adjacent pairs, usually
Paneled normally with " "'" five- ranked on front facade, less commonly three- or seven - ranked.
decorative crown
supported by row of small windows t
decorative pilasters rpicily - I 12►NCIPAL SUBTYPES
rectangular panes five ranked and
beneath crown symmetr;"Ily The Georgian house is usually a simple one- or two -story box, two rooms deep, with
with center door,
less common ly t
doors and windows in strict symmetry. Five principal subtypes can be distinguished:
hicam,
- - ranked or seven-ran
SIDE- GABLED ROOF —About 40 percent of surviving Georgian houses are of this type, which
A is the most common in the northern and middle colonies, but also occurs in the southern
colonies.
SIDE- CABLED ROOF
Pages 144-6
/ CENTERED GABLE
I
s
7
GAMBREL ROOF HIPPED ROOF
;T
Page 147
WB 4
TOWN HOUSE .'.
a,
n n
GAMBREL ROOF —This roof form is found primarily in the northern colonies where it is char-
acteristic of about z5 percent of surviving Georgian houses. Few gambrels survive in the
middle or southern colonies, although restoration research in Williamsburg indicates
they may have formerly been common on one -story southern examples. The shape is an
adaptation of the gable form which provides more attic space for storage or sleeping.
HIPPED ROOF —About 25 percent of surviving Georgian houses have hipped roofs (some are
dual - pitched hipped). This is the most common type in the southern colonies, but is not
unusual in the middle and northern colonies, where it occurs principally on high -style
landmark examples.
CENTERED GABLE —Less than to percent of surviving Georgian houses have a gable (pedi-
ment) centered on,the front facade. The facade beneath the gable may either remain in
the same plane as the rest of the wall or be extended slightly forward for emphasis as a
pavilion. This subtype became common only after 175o, and is found in high -style ex-
amples in all the former colonies.
TOWN HOUSE —The earliest surviving urban houses with narrow front facades and linear
Dlans dare frnm the nenrninn ner ;nd These were nrioinnlly hrrilr ;r, X11 rhP
I Uo[onta[ Houses. Georgian I
tionary urban centers of the Atlantic Coast (see map), but only a few examples rem,
today, principally in Philadelphia and Boston, and in Alexandria, Virginia.
VARIANTS AND DETAILS
The structure and detailing of Georgian houses show distinct regional variations:
NORTHERN COLONIES — Wood -frame construction with shingle or clapboard walls and cc
tral chimneys dominated, as in the preceding Postmedieval English houses of the regic
MIDDLE COLONIES —Brick or stone construction dominated here. Some examples have detai
not found elsewhere, notably the pent roof separating the first and second floors, and tl
hooded front door, in which elements of the decorative crown project forward to form
small roof over the entryway.
SOUTHERN COLONIES —Brick was the dominant building material in surviving southern e)
amples. End chimneys continued to be common, as in Postmedieval English house
Shapes were more varied in the South than elsewhere; dependencies were sometimes i
separate connecting wings or detached from the main house in separate buildings. Som
southern examples are raised off the ground on high foundations. On southern brick e3i
amples doors were sometimes accentuated only by changes in the surrounding brick pat
tern, rather than by an enframement of wooden pilasters and crown.
POST-' 750, ALL COLONIES —After t 75o, a few well- documented examples have the entir
door enframement extended forward to form an entrance porch. Most such porches are
however, post- Georgian innovations. Dormers and decorative quoins became commot
after 1750 in all colonies. In later brick examples the separation between floors is usuaII3
marked by a change in the masonry pattern (belt course). Still more elaborate detailing
appears in some high -style examples after 175o. Among these are two -story pilasters
centered gables, and roof balustrades. A cupola projecting above the roof, while common
on Georgian public buildings, is found on only a handful of surviving houses. Door and
window detailing is discussed in the following chapter, on the closely related Adam style.
OCCURRENCE
Georgian was the dominant style of the English colonies from 1700 to about 178o, when
the population had grown to almost three million and covered the area shown on the
map. In this area many thousands of Georgian houses survive today. Most have been lost
from those colonial cities, such as Boston, New York, and Philadelphia, that grew rapidly
in the 19th and zoth centuries. In sharp contrast are other colonial seaports (all the larger
18th-century towns had direct water communication with England; only villages oc-
curred inland) that declined sharply in importance with the expansion of railroads in the
19th century. Examples are Portsmouth, New Hampshire; Newport, Rhode Island; New
Castle, Delaware; Annapolis, Maryland; New Bern, North Carolina; and Charleston,
South Carolina. Having had relatively little population growth since colonial times, these
towns today preserve much of their Georgian heritage. In addition to the Georgian
houses preserved in such coastal towns, many village and rural residences survive, partic-
ularly in New England. Landmark plantation houses are the principal southern survi-
vors. With the end of the Revolution and independence (1781-83), the country began to
develop new building styles (Adam and Early Classical Revival) based on changing Eu-
ropean fashions. Although scattered Georgian houses were built for many decades after
independence, even these usually showed some details of the newer styles.
shallow
I muntins -
We pp. i 5")
I1PICpL WINDOW (see
y
small panes
Of glass usually
9 / 9 panes as
shown or 12 / 12.
9/6.6/9.8/ 12,
or is /8
molding
TYPICAL CORNICE (see p. 155)
WITH ENTABLATURE C
CHANGE IN MASONRY PATTERN
3321L 1
101113
t
! 1
I- 000
common
„�.
0 LIMI
11 fill .
1 It�
0 LIMI
11 fill .
1 It�
I I
If
'I
i
I'
1
I
I
t '
1 I
I�
I I
I i I
�I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I'
I
SIDE - GABLED ROOF
1. Deerfield, Massachusetts; 1749. Barnard House. Note the wide -board
cladding and double door. The window screens are a later addition.
2. Providence, Rhode Island; ca. 1743, Hopkins House. Part of this
house was built in 1707, with an expansion in ca. 1 743; the door was added
still later. Four- ranked examples such as this are sometimes called three -
quarters houses.
3. Southport, Connecticut; late i8th century. Osborn House. A simple
five - ranked, saltbox form with a central chimney.
4. Deerfield, Massachusetts; 176o. Williams House. Note the broken
pediment over the door and the triangular pediments above the windows.
The 616 window sashes are probably later additions.
5. Medford, Massachusetts; 1737. Roy211 House. Enlarged from a 17th-
century brick house; an equally elaborate rear facade was added in 1747.
Note the chimney stacks connected by a parapet and the unadorned side,
the detailing being concentrated on the front facade.
6. Louisville, Kentucky; ca. 1790. Locust Grove. A post - Revolutionary
example built in an outlying region.
7. Surry County, Virginia; 1652, rebuilt early 18th century. Warren
House. This simple one -story example is a Georgian remodeling of a Post -
medieval house. As is commonly the case in southern masonry examples,
there is not an elaborated door surround but only a segmental arch in the
brickwork above the paneled door.
8. Annapolis, Maryland; t 773. Brice House. A fine example of the five -
part plan with "hyphens" connecting the main house and dependencies.
5
Colonial Houses: Georgian
COMMENTS
Georgian is among the most long -lived styles of American building, having dominated
the English colonies for most of the 18th century. The style grew from the Italian Renais-
sance, which emphasized classical details and reached remote England only in the mid -
16th century. There, Renaissance classicism first flourished during the period 1650 -1750
under such master architects as Inigo Jones, Christopher Wren, and James Gibbs. The
style did not, however, begin to replace Postmedieval traditions in the American colonies
until about 1700, when an expanding and increasingly prosperous population began to
seek more fashionable buildings. It was brought to the New World principally through
architectural building manuals known as pattern books. These ranged from expensive
treatises stressing Italian models —the same books from which Jones, Wren, and Gibbs
received much of their inspiration —to inexpensive carpenters' handbooks showing how
to construct fashionable doorways, cornices, windows, and mantels.
pedimented dormers
belt course
masonry only
pedimented window
quoins
U Ill
Ing
1720 -1780
r�
i
balustrade
front gable (pediment)
shallow projecting
central facade
6 ��I ICI
MORE COMMON AFTER 1750
pilasters
1032 RENAISSANCE IN BRITAIN
respectively by Inigo Jones and John Webb (p. ioo4), with which he incorporated
the great court and Queen Anne's Block, and the two intermediate blocks of King
William and Queen Mary with the Hall, Chapel, two majestic domes, and fine
colonnades.
Winchester Palace (1683 -5), designed by Wren, was left unfinished at the
death of Charles II, and burnt down in 1894•
Middle Temple, London; the cloisters in Pump Court (168o-1) (p. 996)
(destroyed 1941) were from Wren's design.
Winslow Hall, Bucks (1700) (p. 1015B) is a rare instance of a domestic building
by Wren. Particularly noteworthy are the grouped stacks regularly displayed above
the hipped roof.
Abingdon Town Hall (1677 -8o) (p. 103 IF), with its open market and assembly -
room over, is a bold design with pilasters including two storeys, of a character
strongly suggesting the influence of Wren.
The Custom House, King's Lynn (1683) (p. 10308), by Henry Bell (1653 -
1717), is an example of effective grouping.
Guildford Town Hall (1682) (p. 10270 is a bold, picturesque building of the
period, partly vernacular in that it retains timber -frame structure, with carved
brackets supporting the overhanging storey; above are large pedimented windows
separated by pilasters, consoled cornice, hexagonal turret and projecting clock with
wrought -iron stays.
LATE RENAISSANCE
/ (Georgian Architecture, 1]02 -1830)
GEORGIAN HOUSES
We have seen that the course of Renaissance architecture depended largely upon
the leadership exercised by the Crown and its surveyors. So far as domestic archi-
tecture is concerned, the Low Countries still had continued mainly to be favoured
in the Stuart period, influences proceeding therefrom through trade, political
expatriates or pattern books. But about 163o Dutch architecture itself changed to a
straightforward Palladianism, expressed in brick with stone dressings, reflected in
England after the Restoration in 166o. These fresh influences were in turn assimi-
lated, and by the present period an English national character was being firmly
established. There was a great expansion in domestic building. Mansions for the
aristocracy grew more numerous, if progressively less grand in scale, but the really
significant increase was in the houses of the middle and working classes. Already
before 1800, villas were being erected on the fringes of towns, and even humble
cottages mostly had achieved lasting form. In towns, terrace building in rows, a
mark of the Industrial Revolution, became an increasingly common practice.
The Georgian house was generally planned as a simple symmetrical square or
rectangular block with or without wings. The grander winged examples were the
seats of the more well -to -do and the aristocracy. The centre third of the main
block in both types was usually occupied by the entrance hall, which in the larger
houses was carried up the full height of two storeys. The staircase, also designed
for show, was either axially beyond or to one side of the hall and was seen through
columned or arched screens. In the simple block type a single staircase sufficed,
but in winged mansions two staircases became necessary on account of the high
hall. Communication was then achieved at first -floor level by a gallery. Winged
RENAISSANCE IN BRITAIN 1033
W_S_W_AN HOUSE CHICHESTER /
STONE VASE
WREST PMK:BEDS.
I� n
1034
RENAISSANCE IN BRITAIN
/,
A. The Moot House, Downton, Wilts
(1650; remodelled 1720). See p. 1035
B. Eagle House, Mitcham, Surrey
(c. 1700). See p. 1035
c. Mompesson House, Salisbury (1701). See p. 1035
RENAISSANCE IN BRITAIN 1035
round the hall and stair nucleus within the compact rectangular envelope. The
kitchen, stores and offices were relegated to the basement. This type recalls
Coleshill House, Berks (pp. 1013, I051c) and Thorpe Hall, Northants (p. 1013).
(a) Examples of the simple block plan
Swan House, Chichester (1711) (p. 1033A) is built wholly in gauged and rubbed
brickwork, the centre third thrust forward to frame narrow lights on either side
of the pilastered and segmentally pedimented door case. Above the dentil and
moulded brick cornice is a panelled parapet partly concealing the hipped and tiled
roof. Exposed sash boxes and thick glazing bars enliven the front. As this is a town
house it is set back from the pavement edge and has a wrought -iron balustrade on
• low wall with gate piers and steps.
The Moot House, Downton, Wiltshire (165o, remodelled 1720) (p. I034A) has
• Flemish bond brick elevation with stone dressings, the centre projecting to
form a tall, narrow, pedimented feature. It has a hipped roof with hipped dormers,
and a moulded and modillioned eaves cornice and alternate quoins. The sash boxes
are exposed to view, with thick glazing bars, and there is a pedimented door case.
Mompesson House, Salisbury (1701) (pp. I027B3 z, I034c, I051A) is similar
to the Moot House, but is in stone without pediment or quoins. The proportions
and spacings are generous, the sparing use of carved detail rich and satisfying.
Other examples are Eagle House, Mitcham, Surrey (c. 1700) (p. I034B),
Penton House, Hampstead (p. I051D). Bradford -on -Avon, Wilts; Burford,
Oxon; Chichester; Farnham, Surrey; Painswick, Glos. and Trowbridge,
Wilts are all rich in examples.
(b) Examples of the central block with wings
Castle Howard, Yorkshire (1699- 1712) (p. 1037) has the distinction of being
Sir John Vanbrugh's first essay in architecture, at the age of 35. Hitherto he had
been a soldier and playwright, and it was through his kinsman William, who held
office at the Board of Works at Greenwich, that he owed his preferment. With a
typical gesture, he had the village of Henderskelfe swept bodily away to provide the
site. The building is coeval with Blenheim, and the two houses have points in
common. Vanbrugh's amanuensis was Nicholas Hawksmoor. The north front, with
its ordonnance of paired Doric pilasters spaced closely about superimposed niches
for statuary, may owe something to d'Orbay's remodelling of Versailles, while the
dome and lantern recall Le Vau's College des Quatre Nations, Paris, which Van-
brugh must have seen while serving abroad. The hall under the dome had its pen -
dentives painted by Pellegrini (damaged by fire 1940). Its composite clusters of
pilasters in the angles, and the pierced openings above the fireplaces yield dramatic
glimpses of the staircases going up on either side. The west wing, built in 1753 -9 by
the Palladian Sir Thomas Robinson, is somewhat of an anticlimax. In the grounds
Vanbrugh erected the four - porticoed `Belvedere' temple, while Hawksmoor was
responsible for the Mausoleum (1736), of whose close inter - columniations the
Palladians were critical.
Blenheim Palace, Oxfordshire (1704 -20) (pp. 1038, 1039B), by Sir John
Vanbrugh, is the most monumental mansion in England. Vanbrugh's bold and
forceful personality stamped itself on all his designs, which are characterized by
his love of projecting porticos, twinned - column supports for trophies and the con-
trast of light and shade. He had a keen eye for a good site, and Blenheim, lined up
on axis with Blaydon's village spire, was placed on a rise which necessitated a grand
approach by bridge across the dammed waters of the river Glyme. The stable and
kitchen wings soon became imposing courtyard groups punctuated by clock turrets.
--"
oil
i� I � �. == ;41 +jV - �� - 111 1/ � rn �1
Bpi
ME OEM
i1'1 iii'■ `�= ��!- �!r►�_ '�'::�;,:...�
dill I// ( 1�■ 7t /lf
EMI R '~""'" ;1! ■/1 ,_""',r1 ■/ �- 'loll'.
rim,
._...�� ■' 1111 ■/t 1' �■� 1■Ii 1�
;ter o!1 n � (aac; jil>w /�I
FAIIIII'm !I ONE, Ill 1::El�1�:� UK i 115111=
�l
i
,490
Hawk
Fulwider
and
Associates, Inc.
Architectural
Design
and
Planning
Jack J. Hawk
AIA
201 N. Federa I Hwy.
Suite 10'1
Deerrield Beach
Florida
33441
hawkrulw6eminet
(954) 360 -1303
State License
AA c00214(o
�- 15•`t°1
c,kca..
'b�CXrG�V ' �1.a.I
pLoo.� Cc '%I- -
5�(ucco
G(Ae) - t
C•t��,8 -I
� vge)
NILOal- �--n �41
Weracoba 2
u
Hawk
Fulwider
and
Associates, Inc.
Architectural
Design
and
Planning
Jack J. Hawk
AIA
201 N. Federal Hwy.
suite 101
Deerfield Beach
Florida
33441
hawkfulwseminet
1954) 360 -1303
State License
AA c002146
��1YlAl• 5�1� , _ �Jrl r-t , f�A�.. .
�p�It,llL��
Jenkins & Chin Shue
I n c o r p o r a t e d
Renderings & Illustrations
1 •800.241 • 1286
9L96.19£•19S•1 Xe3 i£LO.19£•19S•I
Z£t££ 'I3 `uo1n2l nog H a1►nS ;S y;uanaS '3'S ££
suoiIL-iIsn111 iy s3u113pu3H
d this just yet.
ur work first. It says more than anything we could write.
1, accuracy and composition skills will be obvious, but they're really just
ning. Because those who work with us at Jenkins & Chin Shue find that
led with our ears, too.
- really liste , - so that your design will be represented just as you
d it. And since we're on time with our work, you'll be on time with yours.
1.800.241.1286 anytime.
nkins Patrick Chin Shue
p a 1 u z o d i o a u I
antIS utu:) Q suiNu; j
�
� 5
Al
'cA�
I
a"""?d 1��� �N� iir �"- ."'` -�� sue• r I��
la
I�f i��l
V. -M
,
I.
J � '-ice \�i / "��. 'fvt .r r � ''� L � � � � �v►
i
1 ,
,:-
I�.
�V
Y
' .. ..
1309 S.E IST. STREET A �CURATE LAND SURVEYORS. INC. TEL. (954) 782 -1441
POMPANO BEACH
FLORIDA 33060 L• *aaas FAX. (954) 782 -1442
PE OF SURVEY: BOUNDARY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT 63 OF PLACE AU SOLEIL
SHEET I OF 2
S U 98 -1909
ACCORDING TO THE FB(EAO��N PLACOUNTYYi, 2FLORIDA.
ADDRESS:
917 EMERALD ROW GULFSTEAM, FL
FLOOD ZONE: A5 BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: 71 NGVD CPN : 125109 - 0001 -D
EFFECTIVE: REVISED: 9/30189
LOWEST FLOOR ELEV.: N/A NGVD GARAGE FLOOR ELEV.: N/A NGVD
LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE: 17A NGVD
REFERENCE BENCHMARK: n•Q:�',�s.- .'�cLValvusc
ELE�/. = 12 -4358' r.1•C� -V.�.
CERTIFY TO:
I THOMAS M. WICH, ESQ.
2 WICH, WICH & WICH, P.A.
3 KARIN LEWIS, TRUSTEE OF "THE KARIN LEWIS LIVING TRUST" DATED JUNE 2, 1997
4 ATTORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC., ITS SUCCESSORS AND. /OR ASSIGNS
AS THEIR INTEREST MAY APPEAR
5.
e
LEGEND OF ABBREVIATIONS:
RES.
- RESIDENCE
ADD'N -
ADDITION
CHATT.
- CHATTAHOOCHEE
CONST. -
CONSTRUCTION
A/C
- AIR CONDITIONER
BLVD. -
BOULEVARD
R
- RADIUS
ENCH. -
ENCROACHMENT
A
DELTA
I,P, -
IRON PIPE
A
- ARC LENGTH
I.R. -
IRON PPE
C
- CHORD
P.R. M. -
PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT
f
- TANGENT
P.O.C. -
I
PONT OF COMMENCEMENT
C.B.
- CHORD BEARING
P.O.B. -
PONT OF BEGINNING
C.B.S.
CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE
NGVD -
NATIONAL GEODETC VERTICAL DATUM
R/W
- RIGHT -OF -WAY
U.E. -
UTILITY EASEMENT
P.C.
- POINT OF CURVATURE
D.E. -
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
P.P.
- POWER POLE
A.E. -
ANCHOR EASEMENT
W.M.
- WATER METER
MAINT. -
MAINTENANCE
SAN.
- SANITARY
ESMT. -
EASEMENT
O.H.
- OVERHANG
ELEV. -
ELEVATION
N
NORTH
B.M. -
BENCH MARK
S
SOUTH
SEC. -
SECTION
E
- EAST
TWP. -
TOWNSHIP
W
- WEST
RGE. -
RANGE
CONC.
- CONCRETE
-
CENTERLINE
TYP.
- TYPICAL
50. FT. -
SOUARE FEET
ASPH.
- ASPHALT
P.B, -
PLAT BOOK
STY.
- STORY
O.R.B. -
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
FND.
FOUND
RAD. -
RADIAL
N&D
- NAIL AND DISC
I R I -
RECORD
MSL
- MEAN SEA LEVEL
P.C.P. -
PERMANENT CONTROL POINT
M.H.
MAN HOLE
PAR. -
PARCEL
IM)
- MEASURED
IP) -
PLAT
LP
LIGHT POLE
STA. -
STATION
GAR.
- GARAGE
FPL. -
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
F.H.
- FIRE HYDRANT
N.T.S. -
NOT TO SCALE
F.F.
- FINISH FLOOR
B.C.R. -
BROWARD COUNTY RECORDS
ELEC.
- ELECTRIC
D.C.R. -
DADE COUNTY RECORDS
S E A L
D.B.
- DEED BOOK
P.B.C.R.-
PALM BEACH COUNTY RECORDS
C.L.F.
- CHAIN LINK FENCE
E.O.P. -
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
NOT VALID WITHOUT
IC)
CALCULATED
B.O.W. -
BACK OF WALK
THE SIGNATURE AND
BLK.
BLOCK
E.O.W. -
EDGE OF WATER
THE ORIGINAL RAISED
ALUM.
ALUMINUM
DR. -
DRIVE
SEAL OF A FLORIDA
W.F.
F
WOOD FENCE
N G D-
o/� -
W -
OFFSET
SOUARE FECT
LICENSED SURVEYOR
�. --
-V
EOLCVDTIONS BASED ON ____ _____
AND MAPPER.
S. F 1ST. STREET
POMPANO BEACH
FLORIDA 33060
S
ACCURATE LAND SURVEYORS, INC. TEL. (954) 782 -1441
FF L.B. #3635 FAX. (954) 782 -1442
SHEET 2 OF 2
C A N A L
100' R/ W
° 689921
mod,
X CUT ° -� dock ° �' X CUT
/ 3I
1.35 ' seawall '
V c •:
onc: 0. 20'
r % x 0.70 s. wall 0 0
9 0.10'
c.b . p I r 7
Q✓ 9v
1�
�r
� w -
r
r
Lc
to
N x
4 S�x2b 6Uy co 6.141
E SMT.
900 � F. P. L.
L. F. I i �0 P a d
O , ✓ '80. 96 -° L.P, o D. 1. R.
0.00 1 ICAP(O'BRIEN)'�� uT
13 A
— cv
:NT). & 52 1 AMON. ONC. ER pL D NNE D ��� ' asPhalf�V? 5b N a D
I.R. N1 E R/ 0v
GAP I 50 I•
SET N aD AA
�^ # 3 635
NOTES: SCALE
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED FIELD MEASUREMENTS ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH RECORD MEASUREMENTS. S E A L
2. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A BEARING OF _A�Z4_ __ ALONG THE _
LINE OF PLAT BOOK _ PAGE COUNTY RECORDS. NOT VALID WITHOUT
THE SIGNATURE AND
3. THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR OWNERSHIP, RIGHTS -OF -WAY, EASEMENTS, THE ORIGINAL RAISED
OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD BY ACCURATE LAND SURVEYORS. INC.. SEAL OF A FLORIDA
LICENSED SURVEYOR
4. THIS SURVEY IS FOR TITLE AND MORTGAGE PURPOSES ONLY. AND MAPPER.
AIL
CERTIFICATE:
THIS IS- TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE RECENTLY SURVEYED THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE FOREGOING TITLE CAPTION AND HAVE
SET OR FOUND MONUMENTS AS INDICATED ON THIS SKETCH AND THAT SAID ABOVE GROUND SURVEY AND SKETCH ARE ACCURATE AND
CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL
STANDARDS FOR LAND SURVEYING UNDER RULE 61G17 -6 ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS. MAY 1995.�r
ROBERT L THOMPSON (PRESIDENT)
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER No.3869 — STATE OF FLORIDA
DATE OR
JASON H. PINNELL
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER No.5734 - STATE OF FLORIDA
AIE OF `..URVEY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY FIELD
99 -6)0 -7 �B /�8 -99 s. ✓.. 5 �0 98 S,P L IIUUK
C
MG
A
W
C
Qa
0
47
1
SITE & BUILDING DATA
G1"5 LOT AREA
111649 SF.
EFFECtWE LOT AREA
I1b40 SF.
15T FLOOR LIVMG
7,171 SF.
CEILING OVER B'
IED 6F.
2ND FLOOR LIVWj
7140 OF
TOTAL LIVNG W IS FT CEILNG
4.4457 5F.
IST FLOOR CC.ERED
611 SF.
2ND FLOOR COVERED
137 5F.
tOtAL COVERED
149 5F.
GARAGE W1 STORAGE
670 5F.
C4"6 rLOOR AREA
1X'71 SF
TOTAL FAR r-Fb � SED
DAUI F.
157 70,000 6F(11AW SF.) AT .33
Db39 SF.
TOTAL FAR ALLOWABLE
5.839 SF.
i
ELI
c--
�f
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
PLACE AV 9CEEL DUrUCT
L
a
i
I
LEGAL DESCRUMON
LOT 63 OF RACE AU SCLEIL, ACCORDNG TO
TAE RAT THEREOF A6 FECORDED N RAT BOOK 71
RAGE 61, OF THE PUBLIC RECCR05 OF CRrAVARD COWTT7LORIDA
ADOFE65, 911 EFRALD ROW. GALF'6TREAM, FL.
SITE AREA CALCULATION
GROSS LOT AREA
TOTAL HARDSCAPE AREA
3.120 SF. 16t
DRIVEWATAUALICWAT/POOL 4 DECK
I I
5011 -01 G FOOTPRINT /COVERED AREA
3-63 SF M:
TOTAL IMPFRIOI5 AREA
5,909 SF. 31%
TOTAL LAI406CARETERNCU5 AREA
11,161 SF. 63%
TOTAL OPEN AREA
14,401 6F. DI'
ExIDTR43 DOCK AND DECK dack�
/ LOT 63
er`
/
/
Er15tw. CHARJ LRK . - ---
FENCE TO REMAIN
AT PROPERtT LNE 7 / F - - - - - - - - - 'I
j R
if
NEW S' HGH METAL POOL
FEINCE PER CODE
68.g�
® I IAA
�I
1
II
I I
II
I I
1
•
I
I I 0
1
�
� I
VEIOFT PO-VL MOM 1
JJTH CIWE/! I I
1
DENOTES Ea15TINY3 ORADE j
/
/ \ / • �� / W.4 Hf
/ w EMERALD ROR'
SITE PLAN
r. only
I A
II�D�
I 1
I�
I
I
ICI l
II
H
EXISTNG CFIAM LW
Fe CE TO RE IAN
At PIROFERTT LINE
NEW S' HION MtAL POOL
FENCE PER CODE
LOT 62
-i •
ut
915 EMERALD ROW
GULFSTREAK f'Z
154=--7-7.
�.,..
Nn fir+
Y' �
I
YF --
\cuT
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
1
- 4 It
NEW 2
DRY,
IDINCE
�
j
/ I
�
ti TOP 6F SLAB
—ELEVI
1
' I
I 1
/ / /
/ 1' .0'•O"
L�_ _`"4
/
I
�
/
/ /
,
,
/
/ \ / • �� / W.4 Hf
/ w EMERALD ROR'
SITE PLAN
r. only
I A
II�D�
I 1
I�
I
I
ICI l
II
H
EXISTNG CFIAM LW
Fe CE TO RE IAN
At PIROFERTT LINE
NEW S' HION MtAL POOL
FENCE PER CODE
LOT 62
-i •
ut
915 EMERALD ROW
GULFSTREAK f'Z
154=--7-7.
�.,..
Nn fir+
Q'�%
9 2 5 E b U M A L D R M
G L g I Y I R B A K F L
W . I " p 1 { �� N 1 a Q w 4 + M
" M F / ��P P H ��v Y P i c h i c " y
�% P L W P . * M
. P i m
N U . . . . . g . . .
j u l
n o w
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
1 /4" . 1 FOOT
i• ti
:h: I 11 :l
975 EMERALD ROW
OULF' BEAK FL
w. d.wp r rw 4—,
mir r�aa P+rr�+Y P'�p
MO00 ROOD R/�
'1A1•�.....�f.1Apt, �'id_ uu. .
JM
A
'i _ ETOP OF TIE DEN1 I�
{k CG .7�'•fV-
TTP. COPPER DRIP
EWE PvSR DO CEDAR
HID CLUE AID 7X10 CEDAR
FAOCIA BOARD
T111'f W. ...r
TO TIE Jill
OR M
1•.1I
SEE PETAL
��� �� • •
(� 1i i�sr..ai x. ... � a •.
J�
TOE..PF- IM -AEA11- ty —
ELEv. yO•
u
TF:�;
G G i 7
\ \1111 11
n�rr
■ iii i�
I INS
TOP OF TIE DENY
TTP. DECCRm%,E
CCT_U9N UIRAP
D PLAT GEI`ENT TILE
�O ROOF TYPICAL
A TOP OF LYO PLATE TRIM Y FYPC D
�r TRH DT FI'PGN
cLev. ar_o•
vENT
fi n
TETAL GUTTER O1 OTEM
( ( A fOP OF TIE DENT
RAISED OTNCCO HEADER W LNTEL
KE76TONE OEE DETAIL ® DETAIL ® — _ _ _ _ _ _ ATOP OF FLOOR tmwto
I p
i
DENOTES OULDN D
G -------- 5
EXTERIOR FNIOT t ELEV. d•e•
M C AF=M 'r ^------- - - -- -- +f--
OTurwray Z RNOCD DOOR READER W
a1µ j �I' KETOTCNE WE DETAIL
I 1` V7 •
( RAIDED PANEL GARAGE DOOR
(
FRONT (SOUTH) ELEVATION
11V . I FOOT
ll
,.1 G
I
1T
_- --------- --
FLAT CEMENT tILE
RCCF 11FICAL
Y
"OED OTUCCO tR1M
1TP. WHERE 6WC04
t OEE DETAIL
Y
U_
1T
BAS K
BA_E DR
A TOP OF TIE DENT
[L� .70,.x•
i► Tp+ pF &Q!M T"EO
ELEv. .O -D'
_ ROn ",QM- tt-,*0
ELEV. .O' -!'
® ( t'1 1 I
® TOP OF FLoaq GLAD
TRIM PrL �� -ELEV. .O'0'
•
ERCr RASE-WE DETAIL
LEFT (NEST) ELEVATION
1 /A• . 1 PLOT
IM
YiA
❑■
THE LEWM
475 EMERALD ROW
QULFSIREAK FL
s .•_ J. noo■c.._a■
��3�W�::::::�a..3:
TOP OP TIE BENT
ELEV. 43'•6'
TOP OP PLR TRUSEEO I�
0.EV. �0-
tOP oP TIE BEAn t`
ELEV. 9' -°• 0-
TOP G TIE 8EA1•I
ELEV. 7_
TOP k' Tc 5EN1
PI FV� J)' -!•
I
TqqpP OF R.R tew
ILLFv.
ELEV e' -°•
T
_ I]
TOP of TIE BEAM
ELEV. ao•r
❑W
"•_'y:•- ""'�fa "4W" "" A WUE PLOD R i RiJ.'w
ELEV. m -a
A TOP OF TE DEAM
425 FNIFRAI.D ROW
GULFb'I'RFAK FL
® MICK DASE !EE DETAIL
RFAR (NORTH)ELEVATION
V4 ". 1FOOT
a'U WIt.,SFWI Y6-ttm
OUTLNE OF FLOOR
IFAME°
EM
FM
rm
LLLJ[@?
SF'
A TOP OF TIE BENZ
EL-V EV, .M.�•
u
__J4
uEv w -r
A O FLOOR
__________ ____ __ ______ TOP F
ELEV. .d•O'
RIGHT (EAST) ELEVATION
1;4" . 1 FCY.T
1!Ig7 ■ lx� i
TRIM DETAIL A
II In' . i FOOT O0E64AN4 DETAIL
DRIP /
LDNG
I—
r
SHPG \
1
FACIgSOFFIi \
AND EAVE
TRIM SAME AS
TTPICAL
METAL RAIN GUTTER
_ *x5" WTN BEVELED
PROFILE
PAINTED
2" CEDAR FASCIA
STUCCO KET IV RECESSES PAIEL b.
W&IIENTAL BRICK ARCH
1x4 PANTED CEDAR
WIDOW FRAI•IE WV
In CIFQaE EDGE TRIM
L")D RNIEL "TTER
Ixl CEDAR W M EDGE
DENOTED RAISED STUCCO
W/ COOPER DRIP EDGE
—,-
FETAL RAIN GUTTER
D "xD' WTH BEVELED
PALE
PAINTED
7x10 CEDAR PASCIA -mil
7 In' CONT. PVC EAVE VENT
STUCCO SOTFIT TYP. —_
4 1/4" HIGH EAVE CORNICE MOLD
Ix& PANTED EAVE 9440 .4 1/4' 1
CUiLNE AT BRICK FINISH
OUTLNE CF IBTDOW BAND AT FIN
STUCCO FINISH OVER CM0.J TTP. -
WERE SHOWN
LLRDOU SILL W EDGE
TOP MVLD
TRIM DETAIL
V . I FOOT F"T WINDOW DETAIL
•
SLOPED
TRIM DETAIL n
I• . 1 FOOT BRICK GARAGE LINTFL
RAISED STUCCO
D•
n r1W STUCCO
BEAD
0•
BUILDING HEIGHT SECTION
1/4' . I FOOT MAX M11LOM STRUCTIIE HELYIT
W STUCCO FINISH
OVER cm CW NEr `
PRE •FAB FOAM TRIM 1. p::: - - :1 7
AS SHCWI W/ STUCCO ]_
FINISH \ .
.Y L RAISED `J
/- s BAND 1REAITEEATME NT
L • AS SHCUN
kk
I I
CUTLNE OF PRE -FAS.
PETAL FLUE AND
■.f' SPAR, ARRESTER
I I
TRIM DETAIL /''1c TRIM DETAIL n
)• . I FOOT PREFAB. FOAM TRIM In' • I FOOT OHi%BT CAP
PR_ -FAG FIBERGLASS RENFORCED
FTFCN CLOSED PRE - FABRICATED -� PLASTIC COLUI'N WUP BT I I
OVAL LOUVER DECORATIVE VENT \ FTFCN hFGR•ID' x10. 6c1141g I I
NO 650 OV -)D )S V7' HEKMT I I
WHIITE FNW
I I I
JVEEL R��A STR1CiWAL I I
_ II
I I
I I
TRIM DETAIL n
P . I FOOT OVAL LOUVER DKCRATIVE VENT
STANDERD SPLAY
BRICK
STANDERIP OGEE
eRlp,
TRIM DETAIL_
I' . I FWT BRICK BASE DETAIL
0• y
RAISED STUCCO BASE AID
TRIM W PVC EDGE BEADS
DENOTES RAISED Ill
FINISH FRRl OUPLDNG FNISN fLR
iTP. STUCCO FNISN - - - -
TRIM DETAIL n
1/4' . I FOOT
x
��l i��7���3��L���L��i�n��/+MTp
1<i:L711JI; MB
915 EMERALD ROW
QUIMIREAK FL
lip
��� ■� ■� /l�R14FY�7■
1
DENOTED RAISED STUCCO
PNISH PRCM WILDING
TTP. SNCCO FINISH
BASE UL' PVC BEM
TRIM
DETAIL
In. . I FOOT
STUCCO ARCH DETAIL
BUILDING HEIGHT SECTION
1/4' . I FOOT MAX M11LOM STRUCTIIE HELYIT
W STUCCO FINISH
OVER cm CW NEr `
PRE •FAB FOAM TRIM 1. p::: - - :1 7
AS SHCWI W/ STUCCO ]_
FINISH \ .
.Y L RAISED `J
/- s BAND 1REAITEEATME NT
L • AS SHCUN
kk
I I
CUTLNE OF PRE -FAS.
PETAL FLUE AND
■.f' SPAR, ARRESTER
I I
TRIM DETAIL /''1c TRIM DETAIL n
)• . I FOOT PREFAB. FOAM TRIM In' • I FOOT OHi%BT CAP
PR_ -FAG FIBERGLASS RENFORCED
FTFCN CLOSED PRE - FABRICATED -� PLASTIC COLUI'N WUP BT I I
OVAL LOUVER DECORATIVE VENT \ FTFCN hFGR•ID' x10. 6c1141g I I
NO 650 OV -)D )S V7' HEKMT I I
WHIITE FNW
I I I
JVEEL R��A STR1CiWAL I I
_ II
I I
I I
TRIM DETAIL n
P . I FOOT OVAL LOUVER DKCRATIVE VENT
STANDERD SPLAY
BRICK
STANDERIP OGEE
eRlp,
TRIM DETAIL_
I' . I FWT BRICK BASE DETAIL
0• y
RAISED STUCCO BASE AID
TRIM W PVC EDGE BEADS
DENOTES RAISED Ill
FINISH FRRl OUPLDNG FNISN fLR
iTP. STUCCO FNISN - - - -
TRIM DETAIL n
1/4' . I FOOT
x
��l i��7���3��L���L��i�n��/+MTp
1<i:L711JI; MB
915 EMERALD ROW
QUIMIREAK FL
lip
��� ■� ■� /l�R14FY�7■
1
01:1mp:v"j
I i V�l
It :0-Z
925 FIvIERALD ROW
(JULFYrREAK FL
17 .]MME Mff�
■ -- - - - - - - - - - -
loll
L In::!!
I m I
Islumim:
REMEMME■ ■EMO
ij::: -
■O■
.... rAp
igi- MEN
II II
II II
COVERED PAtl05
224 5F. C PATIO I I
II II
II II
II II
II II
II II
n COVERED PATIO
FAMILY RM
ADDITION 7 STORY'
SF IBS F.
ct.6e
I
FOYBit
ENTRY COVERED AREA
10 SF
EREABF'ASI'
O
IQ CH@I
n --
LIVING RM
LrrrtTff
II
I
II
II
DINING RM
I
II
II
IuI
P1
I
II
II
1
IST FLOUR MAIN
NCVSE A /C/ 1,183 SF.
C*+ICE COVERED POOL BTOR
42 SF. 32 BF.
1
I L/
� OFPICEiBIxIM t
BtS79AG8
-A1C %19� ARE
J
2 CAR GARAGE
PORTE-COCHOW
COCWERE AREA I GARAGE AREA
3S1 SF.. '+98 SF.
1ST FLOOR CALCULATIONS 2ND FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
3/16' . I FOOT
A".A CU.CULATM PER DEMN MANUAL- 2D ADDMDN
GROSS LOT AREA
11,69® 5F.
EFFECTIVE LOT AREA
IIkw SF
PAR CALCULA310M
IM M.> 5835 BF.
I5T FLOOR A/C AREA
OFFICE WING
344 SF
MA14 HOUSE
1,183 SF.
TOTAL
AREA LLV CEILING OVER W 11GT
SF
_
3F
tv c R
IST FLOOR EXt. COVERED AREA
COVERED PORCH AREA
774 SF.
MICE COVERED AREA
42 Sr.
PORIE- COCt4ERE
351 5F.
TOTAL 16t FLOOR EXT. COVERED AREA
on OP.
2140 FLOOR Ext COVERED AREA
COVERED 6ALCONY5
132 SF.
IST FLOOR ENCLOSED NON -A/C AREAS
POOL STORAGE
31 5F.
GARAGE
589 Sr.
TOTAL ENCLOSED NCN -A/C AREAS
op 1w.
TOTAL GROSS COVERED AREA
5871 SF.
INCLUDING IS FT CEILING AREA
WEAL PAR PROiaB®
SITE TOTAL EFFECTIVE AREA
1,169 $F
2000 SF.> 1,1693 SF. • 33.
M'irM.
TOTAL GROSS SF.
IM M.> 5835 BF.
ARFA CALCULATIONS TOTALIStYL t7R COVERED
15 A
INCLUDING IS FT CEILING AREA
Wf M x 'W1 MMK *0 P.*M.MrA
M.
PROVIDB43 7ND FLOOR COVERED AREA
2212 BF.
0
71JE LEWIS
iEw7EDEWB
415 ENCERAL.D ROW
OULFSTRPAK FL
Plant List
Code Q4
Botanical Name / Common Name
Trees / Pains
ca
3
CAIoPlgna b."Mm /arn lul 5"Imr
C6
7
OPMAacpru 1 %r / hAhrl Ltp1"
rtr
3
r adoe" *id / M.*Xs " eeiu•
RtA
3
rndoripr ■W / Rodocipr Colin
PM
I
""-ft radmfiln / rb9•N D•I* P•In
a
6
Qm■ v►glw / LN■ Dic
e°.
3
6rb•I PO. / G6bve M1Y
111
4
WAdii mwo / AdaidY rail
6R
3
6"M ra•raoM&W / a. PAY
Accents
/ Yrubs / Ground Covers
CA
o
Crhm SIWJOR / ori■ by
C!
7
" wA*" /KIV 6•go
Fl6
IM
Fla* b""N / tl■pl>g Fl9
MY.
b
6yygl■ P■iaL MjWd W / MjWotl• TT"
SM
b
6pj91■ P'ria/•oa "tuft , / MIUFD Y 70"
FA
>!
,!R►,b" hdlg / tdun 4wkm
b
7T6
IM v ww %, / FM &hwr "
V6
IM!
v4m■ &Ap� / 6rdrlai v6vn■
i
7TD
A" "- / J*¢r MW P•tlnd
AN
d
Am■ID / 6e1w■I wkr
vrw_
Y
—tir. -Iti
Y.rr w
Lergs Tr-■ Fn&m ng DwUr1
VE
BOB
SIB
545
e15
e+e
BOB
1-Ib'
515
BIB
yr
Yd
If 3
631
6 ry
3 3t
3 h'
3 Cal!
13It
41 Pe
.�1 = 7T�5- i. ,Tiiilr�r
- w-. � .��� `
P.I. r°IdrgD.ull
��
PLAN
IDTr5-
r r.t r.Kr -.0 r� b.0
.94:w- M r- ftw r�+• r .rt.et r ..t.r
r r..rrrr rr r rrur n -
V RW..e1b► M " Iw • 1.r ..It, �•rrrR�rfa
M ..- rr M vr•V .f. qAr M t1 b • rr-
. r+.. oj
• rr
M 1. we. • .! u. fL r pkb ►y
.L I�.� z r! it b P, ri IArt r fr♦ r Mr
..a r,. rr— +...+.
.. w b..ry.1.r by rr, -.-.r. r.b-
a
- K ..r. TI. r*Yi�- �'ra• M rt .frb .Ire roYWr
d rr 1. rbi/ .ih /.ts,r. rri rr Yr fib"
r.earr --ba.. n. r�.I rr r br rr.s .
G,Y I.r -�.r tli.�ifr�h•/. rd M = Ir- r r/s
b. Ycta• -r w7yy�r �•� •� �•�•�
tla rr��l rt•tl.
p.u+.r. — VI. !It rL
Ilx +na5 L. Witte, IIA
La+dx,w hcRecthre
•IAOOOIIOO
(954)566.0989
n
f'
JB46
uu■ •
$1
Lo7' 4)e EA 1-,;7 6y013' /ooy6
.C3ti /L,p/,c -Ic; Foa7"n2iN -T' 27`a9� /lo�a
►u.- y W,g c k W4 ys A57-c; 312otl /S ye
Ta7 ,4L /,�1�E21i /oUS 59'a9Q', 3¢/d
707-4 /1/7,51113 �� %
/7 4-' 94) ti 7oTq _C� _ Lo-T X 0. 17
,300 G Ul3 /c F'EE'T P�U�vlr,�,�.o
N
II
%A
12r-7 Y4 Y4 l2 SW4- L E S ,
k�
f
V,4 -7 ,o�s � .�ccv��7 -6 Z,4-/UV
/mn
C 1?,,4 -0 / .vcc P L 4 /C/ lcroic
L ,z� w l S O E S / o ff ,C/ C e
-9 2:5 E1,"-7EeX 4�0 WX),"
� U LPs 7„1? /- _-// /= Goeil�,�
.DAVIS ASSOCIAT __ ' INC.
Consulting Civil and Environmena Engineers a d Du0r0ve2g1 o er7 - Land Development Consultants a
Planners,
201 S.E. 15TH TERRACE — SUITE 103A — DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441
Phone: (954) 698 -9101 fax: (954)698 -9722
Subdivisions & Condominiums o Land & site Planning *Sanitary Sewer Systems u Water System ^ Drainage Design -Paving Design
Lot Surveys • Mortgage Surveys c Acreage Surveys *Topographic Surveys • Record Plats • Condominium Plats • Construction Layout
14uC7 . -/ R, ;DA \/ /S
/-D S t--T ztt 9 7 8
5-T�t
_r AF Or-
MY�•
03 M
4
J,V
T;E EIEAM
TIE BgAM
d3' -8"' 9
.&R T` l
TIE BEAM
j ADDED UK= SHUTTERS '
IU NDOIU TRIM AND STUCCO
HEADER UU STUCCO KEY
PER CITY COMMENTS 2 -22 -99 TYP. STUCCO OvER
CMU WIT - VERIFY TEXTURE
ADDED WOOD SHUTTERS r —�' OUTLINE OF FLOOR
PER CITY COMMENTS 2-22-SS / TRUSSES
------ - - - - -� — --- - - - - --
RECEIVED
FE8 2 5 1998
Town 0f Guff Stream, F!
BuRding 1),P,.ent
TOP OF TIE BEAM
ELEV. 420' -2°
i
�,
Rigff(EM12 ELEVATION
3/16' - I FOOT
PER CITY COMMENTS
2 -22 -99
11M LEWN
RESIDENCE
925 EMERALD ROW
GULFSTREAM, FL.
■■■■MINE■
ME■■MI■MI■
on
No
:
• $
■ ■MI ■MIEN ■EMI.
IMMEMISIMMINEM
MENEM
..
SIEMENS '
■ OMEN
■■MI■NMIMIMI■MI■MIMIMIMIMI■
onommommossommmom
■E■■■ ■MIMI■MI■■NMI ■MIN
■ENEMIMIEMIMIMI■MI■■E■MI
■■■■
MEMO
MEMO M! 0 ■
WOMEN
■■N■■■■■ ■MI
ONE Mom r
.. ................
COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM F. KOCH. JR., Mayor
JOAN K ORTHWEIN, Vice Mayor
FRED B. DEVITT III
ROBERT W. HOPKINS II
WILLIAM A. LYNCH
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
TOWN OF GULF STREAM )
�I OWN OF GULF STREAM
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
BEFORE ME THIS DAY PERSONALLY
APPEARED �C.,�,Q.�F.I, L-r-- u 15 .
, WHO BEING DULY SWORN, DEPOSES AND SAYS:
THAT THE PERSON(S) OR COMPANY OR FIRM LISTED BELOW HAVE
THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY LISTED BELOW TO
REPRESENT THE OWNER OF SAID PROPERTY AS AGENT FOR SITE
PLAN REVIEW WITHIN THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
L-0 CO3 ° f' P kl� s Ali eDlLx i1 - -
Zb� r� -� 1p"T -mp(�F'
" - 61 ) EK E IPu&W- 5 0�
�' 1
PERSON (S) NAME: , 1 "- Y �IX, 1 V - Alm
h-t
COMPANY OR FIRM NAME:
AGENTS ADDRESS:
No
AGENT'S PHONE: 3:5 4 -';%n .'i 3c8 ,
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
Ch's 7T 0L
(SIGNATURE)
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 14 4-hDAY OF O,r\ O r a 19 O( I
(NOTARY PUBLIC
P" Janice A.Fulwider
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: L r_ MY COMMISSION # CC674138 EXPIRES
ftmmbm 22,2881
,
F aF F o�•° BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC
100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA 33483
Telephone
(561) 276 -5116
T
Fax
737 -0188
` 7
(561)
,, ." •r
Town Manager
KRISTIN KERN GARRISON
_
Town Clerk
RITA L. TAYLOR
AFFIDAVIT
BEFORE ME THIS DAY PERSONALLY
APPEARED �C.,�,Q.�F.I, L-r-- u 15 .
, WHO BEING DULY SWORN, DEPOSES AND SAYS:
THAT THE PERSON(S) OR COMPANY OR FIRM LISTED BELOW HAVE
THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY LISTED BELOW TO
REPRESENT THE OWNER OF SAID PROPERTY AS AGENT FOR SITE
PLAN REVIEW WITHIN THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
L-0 CO3 ° f' P kl� s Ali eDlLx i1 - -
Zb� r� -� 1p"T -mp(�F'
" - 61 ) EK E IPu&W- 5 0�
�' 1
PERSON (S) NAME: , 1 "- Y �IX, 1 V - Alm
h-t
COMPANY OR FIRM NAME:
AGENTS ADDRESS:
No
AGENT'S PHONE: 3:5 4 -';%n .'i 3c8 ,
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
Ch's 7T 0L
(SIGNATURE)
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 14 4-hDAY OF O,r\ O r a 19 O( I
(NOTARY PUBLIC
P" Janice A.Fulwider
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: L r_ MY COMMISSION # CC674138 EXPIRES
ftmmbm 22,2881
,
F aF F o�•° BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC
100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA 33483
01!14/99 THU 14:51 FAX 9544286682
This Document Prepared By and Return tai
J. JET.IPFtEY THISTLE, sag,
DEVITT, '„HISTL3 A DZVZTT, P.A.
30 B.S. 4TH AVE=
DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483
A. Lewis
AN 15
PsreelIDNurnbera 20 43 46 04 22 000 0630
Grantee al TIN: 352 -66 -9856 J
Warranty Deed
This Indenture, ?.fade this /04 dey of June , 1998 A.D. ,
67AM S M. SHERMAN and ROBIN SHERMA,N, his wife
A 001
Between
of the county of Palm Beach , 8:0v of Florida , grantors, and
KARIN LEWIS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE KARIN LEWIS LIVING TRUST DINED JUNE 2,
1997. (The Trust provides and grants the Trustee and Successor Trustee
the full power and authority to transfer, mortgage, assign and encumber
said property)
whoso address is: 7321 N.W. 44 Lane, Coconut Creek, FL 33073
of the Count), of Broward
stato of Florida , grantee.
W itnesseth that the GRANTORS, for and in aonidetatian of the sum of
-------- - - - --° --- --- --TEN DOLLARS ($10) ------------------------ DOLLARS,
and other good and valuable eoruidembon to GRANTORS in hand paid by ORAN'TE6, the receipt whereof is hsrcbyac;mDwieaged, have
granted, bargained and sold to the mid GRANTEE Grad GRANTEE`S helm, successors and assigns forever, the following described land, shuate,
lying and being in the County of Palm Beach state of Florida to wit.
Lot 63, PLACE AU SOLEIL, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded
in plat Book 27, page, 69, Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida.
SUBJECT TO zoning, restrictions, prohibitions and other requirements
imposed by governmental authority; public utility easements of record
and taxes for the year 1998, and subsequent years.
and the grantors do hereby fully Wnrrent the dale to said land, and will defend the aame against Iawfui claims of all persons whomsoever
In Witness Whereof, the ptanvn have hoounto set their hands and Seals the day and year first above written.
S' lgned, sealed and dell e d is our preseace:
�llsr ed Name: JA B SHE (Seal)
PLO, 4ddrm: III Art Venetian Drhe, Delmy Beach. FL 33413
Printed Nam ii:- ( �'t� ROBIN tiEPjgM (Seal)
Wi tnes 9 P.O. Address: 115 A. Venetian Drava Delray Beach, FL 33483
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
The foregoing instrument was w1mowledged be, ale Wt /��h day of June 1998 by
JAMES M. SHERMAN and ROBIN SHERMAN, his wife
who are Personally hown to me or who haw p wucw dwir Florida driver's license OJ i M ICAtion.
j. JEFFREY THISTLE
P., d ama s rn
m ' i7l2�'2001
No ary Public Punic , 1 407
hQ� tan
Cadssioa Expires: mum Q#w1.R
428 LUCX OW -Mtal ty O Gsplay SySUM Lu,. 1997 (941)163-5555 Form PIMMI
JAN -14 -1999
15:01 7^I-IN JF GULF STREAM
561 737 0188 P.01
(c) Whether or not the change
suggested is out of scale with
the needs o� the neighborhood
or the Town.
(d) Whether or not the proposed
zone change; will be likely to
have an adverse effect on the
existing natural environment
and property values in the
nsighborhooi.
5. in regard to applications for
variances and special exceptions,
the Architectural Review and
Planning board shall apply the same
criteria to be applied by the Town
commission as set forth in this
Zoning Code.
b.�
Architectural Review. in reviewing
applications for building permits, the
Architectural Review and Planning Board
may recommend approval, approval with
conditions, or disapproval of the
issuance of the building permit after
consideration of whether the following
criteria are complied with:
1. The plan for the proposed building
or structure is' in conformity with
good taste, good design, and in
general contributes to the image of
Gulf Stream an ;a place of beauty,
spaciousnese, ' balance, taste,
fitness, char's and high quality.
2. The proposed building or structure
is not in its exterior design and
appearance, of i)iferior quality such
as to cause the ',nature of the local
environment to maternally depreciate
in appearance and value.
3. The proposed building or structure
is in harmony' With the proposed
developments on land in the general
area, with the' Comprehensive Plan
f or Gulf Stri, and with any
precise plans adopted pursuant to
the Comprehensive Flan.
4. The proposed building or structure
is not excessively similar to any
other structure existing or for
which a permit tias been issued or to
any other structure included in the
same permit application, facing upon
the sane or intersecting public or
private wary and within two hundred
( 2 0 0) feet of the proposed site in
respect to one or more of the
following features of exterior
design and appearance:
front or Oide e'Avations,
(b) substantially identical size
and arrangement of either
JAN -14 -1999 15:02 711WN OF GULF STREAM
561 737 Olee P.02
doors, windows, porticos or
other openings or breaks in the
elevation facing the street,
including reverse arrangement,
or
(c� Other significant identical
features of :design such as, but
not limited ;to, materials, roof
lime and height or other design
elements.
5. The proposed building or structure
is not visibly excessively
dissimilar in raiation to any other
structures existing or for which a
permit has been' issued or to any
other structures included in the
same permit application in respect
to one or more of the following
features:
(a) Cubical contents,
(b) Gross floor area,
(c) Height of building or height of
roof, or
(d) Other significant design
features such as materials,
color dr quality of
architectural design.
6. The proposed building or structure
in appropriate 4n relation to the
established character of other
structures in trie immediate area or
neighboring area with respect to
significant design features such as
material, color or quality or
architectural design as viewed from
any public or private way.
7. The proposed development is in
conformity with the standards of
this code and other applicable
ordinances insofar as the location
and appearance bf the buildings and
structures are involved.
a. The project's location and design
adequately prdtects unique site
characteriatics such as those
related to scenic views, rock
outcroppings, natural vistas,
vaterwaya and similar features.
3. on its own initiative,. the Architectural
Review and Planning Board, may procure
information and rather data including, but not
limited tea, scale modeld and phiotographs of
other structures within' 1,000 feet of the
nr�„i 4 raw/• 4 c reremar*.v- xnA reeks racommenaations
f matters referenced herein, T?nd may further
convey to the Town Commission .ny suggestion
or complaints relating $hereto submitted to
them by any resident of the Town in regard to
all matters pertaining to their jurisdiction.
C1
TOTAL P.02
PART II. APPLICATION REGI{UIREMENTS
To be completed by Town staff during pre - application conference.
A. Review and Approval Processes
❑
❑
1. A1A Vegetative Disturbance Permit
2. Administrative Appeal
❑ 9. Sign Review
❑
3. Annexation Review
.910. Site Plan Review
13
❑
4. Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Review
5. Demolition Permit ' `1171i,.r T
13 11 - Site Plan
x(12. Special Ec eption Review
❑
El
6. Future Land Use Map Change Review
7. Land Clearing Permit
El 13. Subdivision Review
❑ 14. Variance Review
13
8. Rezoning Review
13 15. Zoning Code Text Amendment Review
1116. (other)
B.
Application Materials
Required/
Recommended
Number of
Copies*
Req.
1_
Y.
Rec.
I)
Application Material
I. Completed Development Application
2. Fee of $ _ .1� i S (U ✓ ,
ve, }
3. General Location Map y,>
4. Site Plan
S. Building Elevations
6. Floor Plans
7. Roof Plan
8. Perspectives t,-
a `IF-.
9. Color Rendering
J
10. Drainage Plan
11. Landscape Plan
12. Septic Tank Permit ', , i
;'t
13. DOT Driveway Permit r f
14. DOT Landscape Permit
15. Survey
16. Subdivision Plat
17. Concurrency Documents
18. Proof of Ownership I"�Gvv
19. Agent Affidavit
20. Adjacent Property Owners
r �
21. Property Owners within 25'
22. Property Owners within 300'
23.
24.
25.
,acr i"a
d
*NOTE: Where multiple copies of a drawing are required, one copy shall be an original full -size
drawing which Is signed and sealed. All other copies sl gI1. tg re.duc d to "x17" or as specified by
-
Town staff. Please refer to the Instruct of manual for more detailed Informa'tiori.
Application for Development Approval Form ADA.592
Page 2
PALM BEACH COUNTY
PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
A. Roland Holt, PE, Director
PPM# PBO -078
Issued: 01/01/92
Effective: 01/01/92
SUBJECT: PERMIT VALIDITY, DURATION AND CHANGES
AUTHORITY: - PBC Amendments to Standard Codes, Sec. 104.1.6
PBC Construction Permit Fee Schedule, Ord. 89 -21, Sec. 8
ULDC, Article 10.D.1
PURPOSE: To provide detail on the duration of a building permit, recite procedures
to re- validate permits that are no longer active, give guidelines for re-
permitting work left incomplete from a previous permit, and resolving
problems from old permits without Finals.
POLICY: Initially, a permit becomes active upon issuance (see
Definitions). After the fees are paid to validate the permit,
construction may begin and inspections may be requested.
• Following each valid inspection, active permit status continues
for six (6) more months.
• While a permit is active, an extension of active status, without an
inspection, may be requested by the permit holder to allow
processing of a revision or for a change of contractor. Also, an
extension to the next projected inspection stage may be
requested on an active permit with submission of documentation
that construction progress has continued throughout the active
permit period, but will not reach the next needed inspection stage
within six months of the previous inspection. Extension of a
permit requires payment of any increased Impact Fees or other
Fees due.
Failure to keep a permit active within time limits above shall
result in the permit becoming inactive six months afterthe date
of last action. Renewal within one (1) year of the inactive date
shall require an application for renewal, payment of fees and an
PBO -078
Page 2 of 5
POLICY:(Continued)
evaluation of design changes necessary for code compliance if
there have been newly adopted codes.
• No renewal rights exist for void permits. If a former permit holder
petitions for revived, active status, the Building Official shall
evaluate the age and condition of previously permitted work, and
the current code compliance of original plans. Fees for a
General Inspection of each trade, and Design Review fees, shall
be paid where required. In restoring a void permit to active
status, the Building Official shall insure all existing work is
restored to "as new" condition, that all remaining work fully
complies with current codes, and all renewal, impact, solid waste
and other applicable fees be collected.
DEFINITIONS:
Active (.Valid): The status of a permit during which construction
progress occurs, inspections can be made and extension request may
be granted.
Construction Progress: Physical, on site activity to place components
of a permitted structure in place for Building Division inspection.
Void: The condition of a former permit when one (1) year or more has
passed since the active status ended.
Extension: The granting of more time on an active permit. Extensions
may be granted when construction progress is proceeding in good faith
but has not reached the stage of requiring the next inspection, or the
project is being monitored outside of the Building Division inspection
system by a resident, special, or threshold inspector. File activity such
as the processing of a revision or a change of contractor may also
warrant an extension, but must be requested during the active status.
Inactive (Invalid): The status of a previously active permit during which
no legal construction progress or inspections may occur. This follows
lapse of the active period. During this time, renewal applications may
be made for one (1) year from the end of active status before the permit
becomes void.
PBO -078
Page 3 of 5
Issue(Issuance): The creation of a permit document following approval
of all required agency reviews by production of the permit bearing the
assigned permit number. The date is that of preparation regardless of
validation date.
Last Action: The last activity date recorded in the Building Division
system. The "last action date" is used to calculate permit status as
active or not. "Last action" shall include the issuance of a new perm it or
a valid inspection on an active permit.
Renewal (Re- validation): An action taken in response to a permit
holder's written request to restore an Inactive permit to Active status,
upon payment of all fees due and possible code design updates.
Revision: A modification of design detail on the building orstructure on
an active permit that requires County review. This may include a
reversed (mirror) image of a former site plan, a reduction in building
dimensions with the same layout, but specifically excludes substitution
of a new floor plan on the same permit.
Valid Inspection: An onsite evaluation by Building Division Inspectors
to verify construction progress has advanced to the next required
inspection stage. New work in place on a valid inspection may be
passed, or it may fail with corrections required. No general
informational visit shall be considered a valid inspection.
Validate. The action of a permit applicant paying all required fees for a
specific permit, after which construction progress may begin and
inspections may be made.
PROCEDURE: Data processing shall issue each permit upon satisfaction of
required approvals. The applicant shall be notified that the
permit and associated plans for field inspection reference are
being held for pickup at Cashier. The initial active six (6) months
begins at permit issuance.
Upon payment of all required fees to the Cashier by the
applicant, the permit is thereby validated and the permit
document and job site plan set provided to the applicant.
Thereafter, on site inspections may be made during the active
life of the permit.
P BO -078
Page 4 of 5
PROCEDURE: (Continued)
• The permit document shall contain warning information to the
permit holder concerning the six (6) months of active duration of
the permit calculated from the last action date.
• Each valid, on site construction progress, special or threshold
inspection, and Building Division file activity, ( such as processing
of a revision while a permit is active), shall be a new date of last
action to start another six (6) months of active status for the
permit.
While a permit is active, formal design revision requiring code
compliance plan review by the County, or change of a named
contractor, may constitute file activity and the permit status may
be recalculated from such action. The Building Official shall not
be obligated to grant any extension request unless the
construction progress actually underway involves the revision.
• A permit applicant making slow, continual, construction progress
toward the next inspection may request an extension of active
status by submission of a written requestwith documentation of
substantial progress, but only during active status. The Building
Official shall not grant extension time past the projected date of
the next inspection due. No extensions shall be granted for lack
of progress due to personal (financial) hardship. But, denial to
such a request shall include information on how inactive permits
may be reactivated for one (1) year after lapse from active status
as a courtesy. Extensions past six (6) months from the last
inspection will require payment of any incremental Impact Fees.
• Failure to keep a permit active as indicated above shall result in
the permit going into inactive status six (6) months after last
action date. Renewal to active status may be requested by the
permit applicant on forms provided, upon payment of renewal fee
(not to exceed initial permit fee or $ 50.00 , whichever is less)
and any new incremental impact fees or other fees that may be
established for permits. Design revisions for remaining work to
comply with any updated building codes may be required as a
condition of renewal. Renewal shall restore the previous permit
number to use, as well as all sub - permits. All renewal requests
on inactive permits must be complete, submitted and
PBO -078
Page 5 of 5
PROCEDURE: (Continued)
acknowledged prior to the permit expiring.
• Inactive permits become void after one (1) year of inactive status.
Void permits do not carry the right of renewal previously recited
for inactive permits. Awritten petition to restore active status on
a void permit may be directed to the Building Official for
evaluation. General inspections for each trade and plan Design
Review to determine plan compliance with current codes may be
required, at the adopted fee schedule, to access the suitability of
work -in -place for completion. A formal plan revision shall be
required to document all on site corrective to insure remaining
work meets current codes. Should the petitioner choose to have
the permit restored to active status after the field design and
revision requirements are defined by the Building Official, all fees
due for renewal of an inactive permit shall also be charged.
12, 2:�)
Director
REVISED: 11/92; 12/99; 03100; 10/00;11/00;03/01
\badmin1 \pbo.078.wpd
COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR.. Mayor
JOAN K ORTHWEIN, Vice Mayor
FRED B. DEVITT III
ROBERT W. HOPKINS II
WILLIAM A. LYNCH
March 17, 1999
Karin Lewis TTEE
7321 N.W. 44th Lane
Coconut Creek, Florida 33073
Dear Mrs. Lewis:
Telephone
(561) 276 -5116
Fax
(561) 737 -0188
Town Manager
KRISTIN KERN GARRISON
Town Clerk
RITA L. TAYLOR
This is to confirm that at the regular meeting of the Town Commission
held on March 12, 1999, your application for a Level 3 Architectural/
Site Plan Review to permit the construction of a two -story single
family home on the vacant property located at 925 Emerald Row, Gulf
Stream, Florida, legally described as Lot 63 in Plance Au Soleil
Subdivision, was considered.
The Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review was approved as presented
and recommended by the Architectural Review and Planning Board with
the revised East Elevation dated February 22, 1999 with the following
conditions: 1) The wooden fence is to be replaced with a fence that
is more compatible with the shape of the lot and architecture of the
home, and the installation should be made in coordination with the
neighbor to the west as much as possible; 2) The septic system must
be approved by the Palm Beach County Health Unit prior to issuance of
a building permit.
If a building permit is not obtained, including the aforementioned
improvements, within one year of approval date, your Level 3 Site
Plan Review will automatically expire.
Very truly ours, Q0
Rita L. Taylor
Town Clerk
cc: Hawk Fulwider & Assoc.
ti�
100 SEA ROAD, GULF ST
� vs
I�SS4 -1 �L�' GGS'z
tau
L/ S,
4w
/I�r —
W
Vd
4,,� u �,
�}.xyc
G
§ 66 -369 GULF STREAM CODE
flagpoles and diving platforms/boards shall Secs. 66- 371 - 66.380. Reserved.
be prohibited.
(6) Location and dimensions.
a. Docks and all ancillary structures shall
comply with the required side yard set-
backs applicable to the lot.
b. Docks shall not project more than five
feet into any waterway and dolphins
shall not project more than 25 feet into
any waterway.
c. Docks shall be no higher than any abut-
ting seawall or 5Y2 feet above mean sea
level, whichever is greater. Ancillary
handrails, steps and lights shall not
project more than four feet above the
dock.
d. A maximum of one dock box shall be
permitted which shall be no higher
than 30 inches and no larger than 24
cubic feet.
e. A maximum of one davit with up to
500 pounds lifting capacity shall be per -
mitted to be attached to a dock.
f. Boat lifts and davits which exceed 500
pounds lifting capacity shall be at-
tached only to seawalls or platforms
landward of the seawall.
g. Lights shall project downward at a min-
imum 45- degree angle from the hori-
zontal plane tangent to the top of the
light source.
(7) Materials and colors. Materials and colors
of docks and ancillary structures shall be
considered as part of architectural review
and planning board consideration and shall
be maintained as approved. - -- -
(Ord. No. 83 -1, § 2(X, I, 3), 4 -8 -83; Ord. No. 91-24,
§ 3, 10- 21 -91)
Sec. 66.370. Approval of other residential
recreational facilities.
Any other residential recreational facilities shall
not be located on any property zoned for residen-
tial purposes without the express approval of the
architectural review and planning board and town
commission.
(Ord. No. 83 -1, § 2(X, I, 4), 4 -8 -83; Ord. No. 91 -12,
§ 2, 1- 21 -91)
DIVISION 3. CARPORTS, GARAGES,
STORAGE FACILITIES*
Sec. 66.381. Carports prohibited.
No carport shall be erected or permitted within
any zoning district in the town.
(Ord. No. 83 -1, § 2(X, E), 4 -8 -83)
Sec. 66 -382. Garages, storage facilities, etc. —
Materials restricted.
Any garage, storage room or other similar de-
tached facility shall be conventional construction
of wood frame or CBS. Noinetal buildings or struc-
tures shall be permitted. No mobile home, manu-
factured home or trailer is permitted within any
zoning category within the town.
(Ord. No. 83 -1, § 2(X, F, 1), 4 -8 -83)
Sec. 66.383. Same — Setbacks.
All approved garage, storage or similar facili-
ties shall meet all yard requirement setbacks of
the district in which the property is located and
shall be located in such a manner so as not to face
any public street or roadway, or shall be ade-
quately screened or buffered so as not to be visible
from any public street or roadway. However, for
lots of less than 20,000 square feet, garages shall
be permitted to face the street without screening.
ZOrd. No. 83 -1, § 2(X, F, 2),4-8-83; Ord. No. 91 -23,
§ 3, 10- 21 -91)
Secs. 66.384 - 66.395. Reserved.
DIVISION 4. LANDSCAPINGt
Sec. 66 -396. Required.
Landscaping shall be provided in all zoning dis-
tricts in the town according to the following reg-
ulations:
(Ord. No. 83 -1, § 2(X, L), 4 -8 -83)
'Cross reference — Parking of recreational equipment or
commercial vehicles, § 30.36 et seq.
tCross reference — Landscape irrigation regulations, §
34 -76 et seq.
Supp. No. 1 CD66:48
ZONING § 66 -369
cated on property fronting on SR AlA shall be building permit for either a main building or an
subject to the established 78 -foot centerline set- accessory structure which would cross lot lines.
back.
(f) Swimming pools shall be located on the same
lot or parcel of land as that of the main building.
In the event of contiguous lots or parcels, a unity
of title shall be recorded prior to issuance of a
building permit for either a main building or an
accessory structure which would cross lot lines.
CO All pools shall be enclosed by a self - locking,
chilcTresistant fence, wall or equivalent barrier at
least founL66fbigh, and in no event shall a pool be
exposed to open view from any public roadway.
(h) No aboveground pools of any nature shall
be permitted in any zonmg district. An aboveg-
round pool shall be considered a pool constructed
or assembled of any material and whose top edge
exceeds two feet in height above the average fin-
ished - - - - -. - - --
grade of the lot --
(i) All pools shall be landscaped so as to pre-
vent exposure to off - premises view from any public
roadway, any public or private right -of -way, and
the ground level of any adjoining property. How-
ever, this subparagraph shall not be construed so
as to prevent the exposure of pools to open view
from public or private waterways.
(Ord. No. 83 -1, § 2(X, I, 1), 4 -8 -83; Ord. No. 92 -5, §
1,9-28-92)
Sec. 66.368. Tennis courts.
(a) No tennis court shall be located, designed,
operated or maintained so as to interfere unduly
with the enjoyment of the property rights by
owners of property adjoining the tennis court.
(b) No lights shall be used in any manner so as
to illuminate any tennis court.
(c) All tennis courts shall be in conformity with
the setbacks required by the zoning district in
which it is located. Any tennis court located on
property fronting on SR AlA shall be subject to
the established 78 -foot centerline setback.
(d) Tennis courts shall be located on the same
lot or parcel of land as that of the main building.
In the event of contiguous lots or parcels, a unity
of title shall be recorded prior to issuance of a
(e) All tennis courts shall be enclosed by a fence,
open wall or equivalent barrier and in no event
shall a tennis court be exposed to open view from
any public roadway.
(Ord. No. 83 -1, § 2(X, I, 2), 4 -8 -83)
Sec. 66.369. Docks.
In the single - family residential district, one dock
per lot of record shall be permitted in accordance
with the following:
Supp. No. 1 CD66:47
(1) Site plan review required. All new docks
and significant alterations to existing cod ks
shall require site plan review and approval.
(2) Permitted as accessory use. ^ Docks shall be
permitted only as an accessory use to single -
family dwellings for the exclusive use of
the dwelling's occupants (residents and non-
resident members of the occupant's family
and resident guests at the dwelling). Docks
shall not be permitted on vacant lots unless
the vacant lot is adjacent to a developed lot
under the same ownership and a unity of
title has been recorded.
(3) Prohibited uses. Dockage of commercial ves-
sels or rental of dock space exclusive of the
dwelling and property shall be prohibited.
(4) Docking parallel tto seawall only. Docking of
vessels shall be permitted in a manner so
that the vessel is docked parallel to the sea-
wall. Docking in any other manner is pro-
hibited.
(5) Ancillary structures permitted. Ancillary
structures including handrails, steps, swim
ladders and up to a maximum of four dol-
phins, one boat lift and one davit (or alter-
natively three davits), two water hookups,
two electrical outlets in excess of 115 volts,
two lights, and one dock box shall be per-
mitted in accordance with the provisions of
this chapter. boathouses, floating docks, ✓
fixed covers, fixed benches, fixed fish
cleaning apparatus, fixed maintenance ap-
paratus, fuel pumps, sewage pump -outs,
Y
l i nil
t -
d• ys
PITA
- '�<i� -;� 4• adi to { •' .. ..jf:
�'' - 1 . � • _ � .i�``,, � � �� -" '.ice, ..�, ..
vi
•}81' t `. - '� �i"'c �'j � ,, • 1 tier C4
�r
Albdpi K �!' y •. 3-
- 3a a 1 - yr •- -r i _ �p � 31'�iy,+� • :te3t
_-•r- -F .tiff' j= :r".
,q�y��,a• r i
9•
1
Z�
Y w -
77 r
~ PREPARED BY AND RETURN TOk
RO � 8� � � �
A. T -0 - 988 14F .C-. 'Lr . T —
e
50f EAST ATLANTIC AVE.
- JELRAY DEA04 FLA. 334U ,,��
006 5 8.2-7 P 3 6 q�
AGREEMENT
4
v
The undersigned, JAMES M. SHERMAN and ROBIN B. SHERMAN, as
owners of that certain real property described as:
Lots 63 and 64, PLACE AU SOLEIL, according
to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book
27, Page 69, Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida,
in consideration of the TOWN OF GULF STREAM and PLACE AU SOLEIL
ASSOCIATION, INC., approving and allowing us to construct a dock
on or contiguous to the aforesaid Lot 63, agree and covenant, for
ourselves, our heirs, successors and assigns, as follows:
1. Any dock constructed by Lot 63, Place Au Soleil shall
be in compliance with all ordinances of the Town of Gulf Stream.
2. No dock shall be constructed on or contiguous to Lot
64 until such time as title to Lot 64 would be conveyed to
unrelated third parties and dock usage by us or the other owners
of Lot 64 ceases pursuant to this Agreement; any future dock
construction on or contiguous to Lot 64 shall be in compliance
with all ordinances of the Town of Gulf Stream. `Fs
3. The dock to be constructed on or contiguous to Lot 63-
shall be used solely by the undersigned or other owner of Lot 64,
as an accessory structure and use to Lot 64, but only until such
time as title of Lots 63 and 64 would cease to be owned by the
same identical parties, such time to be referred to as the
"termination date ", whereupon the dock on or contiguous to Lot 63
shall not be used by any party until such time as a residence on
said Lot 63 would be constructed.
4. Pending the termination date, no vehicles shall be
parked on Lot 63; thereafter vehicles may be parked on Lot 63
only to the extent permitted by the ordinances of the Town of
Gulf Stream.
5. This Agreement shall constitute a covenant running
with the land as to Lot 64 until the termination date and shall
i constitute a covenant running with the land as to Lot 63 until a
residence is constructed thereon and title to such Lot has been
SPINNER, DITTMAN. FEDERSPIEL & DOWLING
/ 501 EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE -- DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 - - (407) 276 -2900 1
co veyed to a party or parties unrelated to the owner or owners
of Lot 64.
6. This Agreement may be enforced, by injunctive relief,
by either the Town of Gulf Stream or Place Au Soleil Association,
Inc. and, if injunctive relief is granted, the enforcing party
shall recover its costs and reasonable attorney's fees from the
parties against whom enforcement is sought.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals
this y! day of
1988.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
Jams M. She a
�, �•
cl
�L
Robin Sherman
STATE OF FLORIDA
SS:
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED befo tie b JAMES M. SHERMAN and
ROBIN B. SHERMAN, this -1 day of 5����
988•'�'�
Notary Publi
State of Flori a
otary P(:Glic, Stag
My Camrn_si•: ; +r.; k,2 7, iS3j
sherman.1/23 Isond-a,),,. Troy r,:,.
SPINNER, DITTMAN. FEDERSPIEL & DOWLING
501 EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE - - DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 - -(407) 276 -2900
2
RECORD VERIFIED
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA.
JOHN 0- DUNKLC
CLERIC Clh; ^;.;; i COURT
J
v
J
-
93 PAGE
ISO. s7 r 1 v
oa zn, T A T E OF FLORIDA _
-
pMSwryt
r r !•:
rm
20 43 46 04 22 000 0610
LYNCH WANDA R
PLACE AU
SOLEIL
9
AND
270000
7.092
EN TA
2916.21
943 EMERALD ROW
LT 61 /LESS
PARCEL IN
OR1413
D
BUILDGE
167260
9.682
CH TA
3920.93
DELRAY REACH FL
P492/
XH
ARKET
437260
33483SALE YR
72 ORB
2085
P 1538
ASSESS
436168
P/C 001
ACRES
C20
MSTD
25000
4.042
UN
1662.11
EN VAL
411168
3- 211 -960 -7
SCH VAL
411168
WA
108.00
TOTAL
8667.25
20 43 46 04 22 000 0620
JARED 0 ALAN IIT L MOLLY
U PLACE AU
r!FTI
M9
LAND
195000
7.092
EN TAN
3083.39
935 EMERALD ROW
LT 62
D
EUILDGE
266366
9.682
CH TAN
4209.14
GULFS',KEAM EL
SALE YR
87 ORS
5441
P 1091
XH
MARKET
461366
33483
ASSESS
459739
P/C 001
ACRES
C2
iHMSTD
L5000I
042
UN
1757.35
I6FN VA�
4'-739
_
.
L'7 n.
6
ua
106.0u
TOTAL
9157.92
20 43 46 04 22 000 0630
LEWIS KARIN TR
PLACE AU
SOLEIL
LT
63
M9
LAND
180000
7.092
i EN TAX
1281.16
7321 NW 44TH LN
SALE YR
98 ORS
0469
P 1099
D
BUILDGE
638
9.682
CH TAN
1748.94
COCONUT CREEK FL
XO
MARKET
180638
33073
ASSESS
180638
P/C 000
C2
ACRES
4.042
UN
730.21
GEN VAL
180638
SCH VAL
180638
3- 211 -972 -0
TOTAL
3760.31
9
PLACE AU
SOLEIL
LT
64
M9
LAND
145000
7.092
EN TAX
2729.96
20 43 46 04 22 000 0640
BURKE JOHN V
SALE YR
96 ORB
9417
P 0953
D
BUILDG5
239909
9.682
CH TAX
3726.69
PATRICIA M BURKE
XO
MARKET
384909
915 EMERALD ROW
ASSESS
384909
GULF STREAM FL
33483
P/C 001
C2
ACRES
4,042
UN
1555.96
EN VAL
384909
CH VA
384909
3 -211 -979 -8
WA
108.00
TOTAL
8120.61
-- - - -
EX TAX
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
EAA /DD DEBT
- - - - - - - -
SWA /DD
- - - - - -
MAINT
- - - - - - - -
CSWA /LI
- - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
SW /TOT CO
- - - - -
ONAV/MUN
TAX E
PT /TOT TAX
ITEMS
NON- EX -VAL NON
0 13665.70
.00
324.00
0
.00
.00
.00
PG-TOT- SCHOOL 4
0
24000.42
5705.67
29706.09
PG- TOT - GENERAL 4
1411454 10010.72
.00
.00
JAN -25 -1999 09:28
70WN OF GULF STREAM
I
FALK RVACR COiJNZ'Y
RSOU3ST DATk AIIN
PRouRTY TION sT
561 737 0188 P.01
NAME OF =FOY
AND /OR - TZMIVIDUA
: TOWN OF GULF STREAM
ADDRESS:
1100 qea Road, Gulf
Stream, Florida 33483
TELEPHONE
ER: 561- 276 -511
DESCRIPTION
OF RUN OR AREA REOM
TED:
Barr #
20434604224000634
Lot 63 of Plaae'Au Solail.
Subdivision.
See attadhed.c
py of portion of tax map.
PlRgRg
d Tint -out and mailinq
labels for all roperties
within
25' of-this proper
y.
CHECK ONE:
j
HOMEOWNERS ASSN
LABEL
I
_'INDIVIDUAL OWNHR6 NAMES
__ XX.,PRINT
OUT & LABELS
� OF EACH CONDO XMIT
PRTNT
OUT
TAX ROLL ]MCEiPT
1, THE UNDE
SIDED, KISH TO MD1.1t
TRZ ABOVE D99CRI3= DATA RUN.
I UMERSTAX11
THAT I WILL BE RES
STRLE FOR ANY CHARGE$ INCURRED.
PLEASE CONTACT,
CLARICE F. PET
KIN
PHONE #355-:356
OR FAX 355 -441
#355-2352
GLORIA DEAN
(SIGOATURE) jita L. Taylor
Town C1ei
5 2 -9
(VA'!I )
k
Post -it` Fax Note! 7671 °ate �-a� - % Pagos �-
To Fro k d
coJPe •. Co. p W 4 v
Phone A i Phone k V7 S^f fij
Fax 4 ? Faz S
SUBJECT PROPERTY
20 43 1 46 04 1 22 1 000 1 0630
ICTY RNG TWP SEC SUB BLK I LOT
20 43 46 04 22 000 0620
0630
0640
PG: 1 OF
Name: Town of Gulf Stream
CTY RNG TWP SEC SUB BLK LOT
NAME OF
ADDRESS:
PALM BEACH COUNTY
REQUEST FO DATA RUN
PROPERTY INPO TION RRQVXXT
ANY AND /OR ZNDIVIDUA : TOWN OF GULF STREAM
100 Sea Road, Gulf Stream, Florida 33483
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 561 - 276 -511
DESCRIPTION IOF RUN OR AREA REQUE�TED:_
Parcel #120434603050000371- 1 of Gulf Stream Proper -ties
S 25 ft. of Lt 37 & all Lt 38. See attach copy of
portion f tax map.
withi
25' of this propetty.
labels for all properties
CHECK ONE: i HOMEOWNERS ASSN
EL INDIVIDUAL OWNERS NAMES
_PRINT OUT & LABELS I OF EACH CONDO UNIT
PRINT OUT TAX ROLL RECEIPT
I, THE UNDE SIGNED, WISH TO ORD R THE ABOVE DESCRIBED DATA RUN.
I UNDERSTAND THAT I WILL BE RES ONSIBLE FOR ANY CHARGES INCURRED.
PLEASE CONTACT, CLARICE P. PET RKIN
PHONE #355-"358 OR FAX 355 -441 Q
#355-1352 GLORIA DEAN
Please retur to South County
(SIGNATURE) # Rita L. Taylor,
Town Clerk
1 -25 -99
(DATE)
Post -it° Fax Note 7671
+
Date �.�� _
# of
# of
To
Fro
Co. /De
Co. C? (W,
Phone #
Phone # 1- 7
Fax # / r ]
Fax # 5 7
0
o
SZ1 H N
' f
05 I
cr
=n 7t L 61
ss sc s �l i\ A �\ tv
Oaf 02
O's COW
It
i / ocr
ool I
t1�� _ • fit,,,, °a! sSt o_ �• ,. , ate,
IC
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Architectural Review and Planning Board
of the Town of Gulf Stream will hold a Public Hearing on February 25, 1999,
at 8:30 A.M., and the Town Commission will hold a Public Hearing on March
12, 1999, at 11:00 A.M., both in the Commission Chambers of the Town Hall,
100 Sea Road, Gulf Stream, Florida, at which the following will be
considered:
An application submitted by Jim Fulwider and Jack Hank, as agents for
Karin Lewis TTEE, the owner of the property located at 925 Emerald Row,
Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as Lot 63, Place Au
Soleil Subdivision for a LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL /SITE PLAN REVIEW to
permit the construction of a 2 -story single family dwelling consisting
of 5,821 square feet.
The Architectural Review and Planning Board shall make a recommendation to
the Town Commission, and the Town Commission shall make a final decision
regarding the subject application at their respective meetings noticed
above. These meetings may be adjourned from time to time and place to place
as may be necessary to hear all parties and evidence.
The complete application materials are on file in the Office of the Town
Clerk located at 100 Sea Road, Gulf Stream, Florida 33483, and may be
reviewed during regular business hours, which generally include non - holiday
weekdays from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.
ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN THESE MATTERS may appear before the
Architectural Review and Planning Board and the Town Commission of the Town
of Gulf Stream at the times and place aforesaid and be heard.
SHOULD ANY INTERESTED PARTY SEEK TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OR TOWN COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO
ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THESE PUBLIC HEARINGS, SAID PARTY WILL NEED A
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE, MAY NEED TO INSURE THAT A
VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE
TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 286.0105,
F.S.S.
TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA
Dated: February 1, 1999 jj2
Rita L. Taylor, Town Clerk