Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout1996_10_23_R231 The Town of Leesburg, Virginia RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION: PRESENTED October 23~ 1996 96-231 ADOPTED October 23, 1996 AUTHORIZING THE FORM FOR EVALUATING CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE WHEREAS, the performance of contractors working for the town has not been evaluated in the past; and WHEREAS, it will be the town's policy in the future to formally evaluate the performance of contractors providing goods and services; and WHEREAS, the attached form has been reviewed by the Finance Committee and has been recommended for approval. THEREFORE, RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows: The enclosed performance evaluation form for contractors is hereby approved. PASSED this 23rd day of October , 1996. /TTaomeS E. Clem, Mayor wn of Leesburg ATTEST: Clerk of Council R;contractots Town of Leesburg Contractor Performance Evaluation Form INSTRUCTIONS: Read each question and circle the choice that best describes your evaluation. Only performance on this Contract or Purchase Order shall be considered when responding to the following question. You must comment on each questiot~ Attach additional pages if necessary. Contractor: Contract or Purchase Order Number Type of Services or Goods 1. Was the work performed or goods delivered for the cost established in the Contract or Purchase Order? Yes [ I No [ l Comment Cotmnent On average, considering the due dates of all services and deliverables identified in the Contract or Purchase Order, how timely was the Contractor in meeting the schedule? Alway~ on sch~ule U~ually on schedule On schedule half the time Rarely on schedule Never on schedule How well did the Contractor meet the performance criteria or scope of work established in the Purchase Order or Contract? Fax exceeded Exceeded Met criteria Below Far below Comment o Overall, how responsive was the Contractor to your requests for information and to requests for changes in costs, schedules, performance standards or scope of work? Very responsive Somewhat responsive Somewhat unresponaive Very unxespon~ve Froject Manager Signature Date: Department Director Printed Name Signature Date: Printed Name