The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutMinutes_CCMeeting_03152011February 22, 2011 Dear Property Owner: The City of Iona's Planning and Zoning Commission has scheduled a public hearing on the evening of March 9, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. at the Iona Community Center, which is located at 3548 North Main Street, Iona, Idaho. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a request for an amendment to the R-T zone to allow patio homes. A second public hearing is scheduled for the evening of March 15, 2011 at 7:30 P.M. at the Community Center with the City Council for final approval if so recommended by Planning and Zoning. If you have any comments concerning this request, they will be considered at the public hearing. Comments may be made in writing, but must be received by the City Clerk seven (7) days before the public hearing. Any person needing special accommodations to participate in the above noticed meeting should contact the City Office the day before the meeting at 523-5600 Respectfully yours, Robyn Keyes, City Clerk et% CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 15, 2011, 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT TO R-T ZONE TO ALLOW PATIO HOMES 7:30 P.M. PRESENT: Mayor Brad Andersen, Council President Jane Shaw, Council member Dennis McArthur, Council member Dan Gubler, Treasurer Ron Nelson, City Clerk Robyn Keyes, Public Works Supervisor Zech Prouse, ABSENT: Council member Bruce Case, Police Chief Shannon Basaraba. VISITORS: Allen Eldridge, Greg Hansen, Gerry Kirkpatrick, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Wes Jones, Rita Armstrong Mayor Andersen welcomed everyone and led with the Pledge of Allegiance. Consent Agenda. The consent agenda was reviewed. Mayor Andersen said he had heard the sports director may not want to continue to work for the City since she moved to Idaho Falls. The Mayor said he would check on the issue. Supervisor Prouse said he was getting the land ready for the new park on the corner of Quaky Aspen and Iona Road. Council President Shaw made a motion to accept the consent agenda. Council member Gubler seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried. Quit Claim Deed. Mrs. Armstrong asked the City if they needed the land between her's and the property to her south for an alley. The Mayor said the City did not, and would never make that section into an alley because of the development in Homer Estates. The Mayor told Mrs. Armstrong the City was willing to deed the property to her and her neighbor. As soon as the City received the legal description from the engineering company the City attorney would draft the ordinance to deed the property to Mrs. Armstrong and Mr. Brown. Mayor Andersen said typically the landowners involved split the cost of the legal description, and he said he would let Mrs. Armstrong and Mr. Brown know the total cost. Resolution for Backflow Prevention Fee. Mayor Andersen said the average fee for back flow prevention was $45. Supervisor Prouse recommended between $50 or $60 for the fee. Council President Shaw recommended the City offer to collect $2 per month on the water bill for City residence and then perform the service annually. The Council agreed with the cost of $48 for the backflow prevention testing. Also, the City would provide a list of backflow testers for the homeowners so they had an option of who to use. 1 Council President made a motion to approve Resolution 2011-03 establishing a backflow prevention inspection fee of $48 annually, (the Resolution read) WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the City of Iona to provide water that meets Idaho State water quality standards to all consumers occupying or visiting the City of Iona's premises; WHEREAS, it is the City of Iona's responsibility to prevent the contamination of the public water system from the source of supply (i.e., to the customer's connection to the service pipe or meter); WHEREAS, the City of Iona also owns the facilities and the plumbing systems that deliver the water to the consumers. WHEREAS, it is a requirement of the State of Idaho for the City of Iona to establish a cross - connection control program; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and the Council of the City of Iona, that the City of Iona hereby authorizes the implication of a fee set forth below for any backflow prevention inspection performed on private property. Council member McArthur seconded the motion. Roll call as follows: AYE: Council President Shaw, Council member McArthur NAY: Council member Gubler Motion carried, Resolution 2011-03 approved. Mayor Andersen asked Council member Gubler why he was opposed to the resolution. Council member Gubler said he was opposed because the State made the backflow prevention testing requirement but did not supply the means for having the testing preformed. Gubler said there had never been a problem with backflow in Iona before. Mayor Andersen said there had been a few incidences with backflow in the past, and there was always potential for future incidents. Council member Gubler asked Clerk Keyes to insert the State Code reference in the resolution. The Council agreed and Mayor Andersen said the code was IDAPA 58.01.08.543 and 552. Clerk Keyes said she would insert the number. Treasurer Nelson asked how the City was going to enforce the rule. Mayor Andersen said the first year would be a lot of education for homeowners. Council President Shaw asked if since the City owned the water system, could the City perform the inspection for no charge. Mayor Andersen said the City could not because it could get sued for taking by private companies that offer the service. Supervisor Prouse said the City of Rexburg did its own buildings and then gave companies and homeowners a list of who could provide the testing service. Approval of Bette Lovinus to Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor Andersen said Bette Lovinus had visited the Planning and Zoning Commission and wanted to join the 2 Commission. Mayor Andersen said he believed Lovinus would be a good addition to Planning and Zoning. Council member Gubler made a motion to approve Bette Lovinus to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Council President Shaw seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried. Public Hearing Amendment to R-T zone. After conducting a hearing to make an amendment to the R-T zone to allow Patio homes, the Council decided to table the decision for further deliberation. The hearing was closed and the Council has up to 45 days to reach a decision. R-T Ordinance Approval. The Council tabled the R-T ordinance approval until after the R-T patio home hearing decision. Building Code Ordinance Approval. Council President Shaw said there were a few things wrong with the building code and recommended the Council table the approval. The Council agreed. Council President Shaw made a motion to adjourn. Council member Gubler seconded the motion. All were in favor. Adjourned 9:20 p.m. 3 APPENDIX A PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 P.M. AMENDING R-T ZONE TO ALLOW PATIO HOMES IN PLACE OF TOWN HOMES PRESENT: Mayor Brad Andersen, Council President Jane Shaw, Council member Dennis McArthur, Council member Dan Gubler, Treasurer Ron Nelson, City Clerk Robyn Keyes, Public Works Supervisor Zech Prouse. ABSENT: Council member Bruce Case VISITORS: Greg Hansen, Gerry Kirkpatrick, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Wes Jones, Allen Eldridge. Mayor Andersen welcomed everyone and went over the procedure for the public hearing. The Mayor read the recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, which was to allow patio homes in the R-T zone with the provisions that appropriate adjustments were made for the set backs. The Mayor explained that the Planning and Zoning was a recommendation board and the Council was a legislative and policy making board. The Mayor turned the time over to Mr. Hansen with Rockwell Development. Mr. Hansen said he had made the rounds to the other local municipalities to discuss the major slowdown with building. Hansen said one thing he was noticing was the constant decline with town home sales. Hansen said he attended a nation builder convention and the town home decline was reflected nationally. A new popular alternative to town homes were patio homes, which was also becoming a trend nationally. Hansen said Rockwell began building patio homes in their development in Chubbuck and the idea had been successful. Mr. Hansen handed out papers showing the examples of Rockwell's town home designs and explained that a town home was two homes built with a common fire wall through the living space between them. Hansen explained that the State had just passed a new fire code allowing homes to be built with a total easement of six feet between two separate structures. Hansen also handed out papers showing examples of patio homes. Mr. Hansen explained that the biggest issue with most local cities was density of people. Hansen said the patio homes would not change the current density allowance in the R-T zone. The patio homes were an equal density exchange with the town home. The main difference between a town home and a patio home was the town home was one structure with two families living in it. The patio homes were separate dwellings and were 28 feet wide at the narrowest. Council member Gubler asked what the square footage was of the patio homes. Mr. Hansen said they were between 1,100 and 1,400 square feet. Hansen said the patio homes were more economical to build than a town home therefore making them more affordable. Hansen said when he was showing buyers their housing choices, the town homes were the least desirable, which is why they have not been building in 4 Mountain Ridge Estates R-T zone. Hansen said he has been selling patio homes in Rockwell's other developments in the area and subsequently the developments were filling up rapidly. Hansen said lack of progress in a development creates undesirable situations. Mr. Hansen showed two aerial maps of town homes in a cul-de-sac and how because of the connected homes, the driveways took up the majority of the green space in the front making a very undesirable circle. Mr. Hansen showed a plat of a similar cul-de-sac with patio homes and it showed uniform individual driveways with more green space separating the dwellings. Hansen said there had been many issues with town homes with connected driveways. The issues were typically regarding snow removal, or snow melt on the neighbor's driveway, and taking of parking space in the driveway. Hansen said because the patio homes had separate driveways, there were no issues. Supervisor Prouse said the current patio home set back requirements would not work in a cul-de-sac. Mr. Hansen said the side set backs would not begin until the front setback began, otherwise 30 feet from the front property line so they would work. Mayor Andersen asked what the square footage difference was between patio homes and town homes. Mr. Hansen said the patio homes were typically 1,400 square feet and the town homes were typically 1,100 square feet. Mayor Andersen asked how ownership worked with the town home. Mr. Hansen said after the two town homes were built, the surveyor went straight down the center of the two homes and that was how the legal description was calculated, then each half was individually owned. The Mayor asked Mr. Hansen if the lots in the R-T zone would need to be re -platted for patio homes. Mr. Hansen said they would, and Rockwell would pay for the cost of re -platting. Mr. Hansen said the property would be divided before the homes were built; then they would only build a patio home as needed. Hansen said with town homes they had to build both homes at the same time, and they had to finance both at the same time with the risk of selling one home but not the other. Mr. Hansen said with town homes, both sides needed to be the same, but with patio homes there was much variation between floor plans and exterior appearance, which made them more appealing to buyers. Mayor Andersen asked if there were financing issues. Mr. Hansen said the banks preferred the patio homes because there have been issues with insurance with town homes. Mr. Hansen said due to liability issues, most lenders require that both town homes carry full coverage. Mr. Hansen said that patio homes also retain their value longer. Council President Shaw asked if the side set backs for patio homes would be six feet for each home or six feet total between homes. Mr. Hansen said the set backs would be six feet for each home, giving a total of 12 feet. Mayor Andersen asked if the patio homes could have basements, and Mr. Hansen said they could. Council President Shaw said the patio home code had certain stipulations that she wasn't sure the City could enforce, such as no accessory buildings. Council member Gubler said the City can say no to what ever it wanted. 5 tly7r775 Mr. Hansen said the City of Idaho Falls approved patio homes to one of the subdivisions, and the City of Ammon made an amendment to the R-T zone to allow patio homes. Mr. Hansen said he believed patio homes were good for keeping building going and good to offer variety in affordable housing. Mr. Hansen said one of their most popular models for patio homes was the Darby plan, which sold for $116,000. Supervisor Prouse asked if Rockwell still wanted to build R-1 homes in the R-T zone. Mr. Hansen said that was Rockwell's initial idea to get building going again in Mountain Ridge Estates, but it wasn't a cost effective plan, which was why he was asking to build patio homes instead. Mr. Hansen said he would like to keep the option open to build R-1 homes in the R-T zone, but since the infrastructure was in for two homes per lot, it wasn't their first choice. Mr. Hansen said Rockwell would not open the new division in Mountain Ridge Estates until the existing divisions were developed. Mayor Andersen said the Council tried to tell Mr. Johnson from Rockwell not to plan so many town homes in Mountain Ridge Estates. Mayor Andersen asked if there was anyone in the audience who was opposed to the request. No one was. Mayor Andersen asked if there was anyone in the audience who was neutral. Gerry Kirkpatrick said he thought he made a mistake buying a town home. Mayor Andersen said he didn't think he made a mistake and that the town home was a nice home. Mr. Kirkpatrick said he lived in a town home in the R-T zone and asked if his zone would change. Council President Shaw said the zone would not change; if approved, there would be an amendment to the zone to allow patio homes. Mr. Kirkpatrick asked if the lots would be re -platted. Mr. Hansen said the empty lots would be re -platted if patio homes were allowed. Mr. Kirkpatrick asked if only one patio home at a time would be built; Mr. Hansen said they would. Mr. Kirkpatrick asked if anyone could build only one town homes. Council President Shaw said they could. However, they would be required to buy both lots, and the home would just be a single family home. Mr. Kirkpatrick asked if the landscaping would be installed like with the town homes; it it would not. The Mayor said City could not require it. Mr. Kirkpatrick asked if the patio homes could have basements, and Mr. Hansen said they could. Wes Jones said he lived in the other town house next to Mr. Kirkpatrick. Mr. Jones said he was concerned how patio homes in the area would impact the value of his town home. Mr. Hansen said the value of town homes were declining in general. However, town homes built in developed areas were holding their value better. Mr. Hansen said patio homes tend to help boost the value of entire neighborhoods because there were more homeowners instead of renters. Mr. Hansen asked Mr. Jones how old his town home was. Mr. Jones said his home was six years old. Mr. Hansen said he should still have equity in the home. Mrs. Kirkpatrick said noise was not an issue, and she had never heard her neighbors. Mayor Andersen asked if anyone in the audience was in favor of the request. No one was. 6 Mayor Andersen asked Mr. Hansen if he wanted to rebut. Mr. Hansen said as a developer, he would not propose anything that would downgrade the value and integrity of the neighborhood. Hansen believed the patio homes would add value to the R-T zone. The Mayor closed the public portion of the hearing and opened it for discussion for the Council. Council member Gubler requested a five minute break. The Council took the break and then resumed the hearing. Council President Shaw asked what type of housing was to the east of the Kirkpatricks; it was R-1 homes. Shaw suggested that Rockwell continue to build town homes on the rest of the street where Kirkpatrick's lived so they wouldn't be the only town home on the street, and then put patio homes in the other areas Rockwell proposed. Shaw said by replacing town homes with patio homes, the density of people and homes would not change, but there may be an appearance of more homes because of the separation. President Shaw said because of her 30 years of experience in the building industry, she agreed with Mr. Hansen about the popularity of patio homes, and she agreed with patio homes increasing the value of the R-T zone. President Shaw said she liked the patio homes Mr. Hansen had presented and liked how they could add to the variety in the neighborhood. President Shaw was in approval of the request, but wanted concessions made for the Kirkpatricks and Jones'. President Shaw said she wanted six foot side set backs for each patio house, and not six feet total between houses. Council member Gubler asked Clerk Keyes if she had given proper notification for the hearing. Clerk Keyes said she had posted 15 days notices on the building, in the Post Register, and had sent notices to everyone living in the R-T zone. Gubler said he was not entirely against patio homes, but he was against the six foot side set backs, he wanted the set backs left at 10 feet. Council President Shaw asked if Rockwell's request was only for the R-T zone. Mayor Andersen said it was, and in other places where patio homes were allowed, builders must follow R-1 requirements. Council member McArthur said since there were only three people at the hearing, he was taking that as a lack of concern by the people. McArthur said he thought the patio homes would add to the value of the R-T zone as opposed to town homes. Mayor Andersen read Council member Case's email regarding the issue. Case's letter said, "I just don't see people lining up to buy 900 square foot homes. I don't think we should change our code anytime a developer comes in and wants to do something to help boost sales. Everyone I spoke to was opposed to homes on one seventh of an acre lots as are patio homes. I don't see the sound reasoning behind it other than benefiting the 7 developer. What happens to those small homes years down the road when the economy picks up and people move up to bigger homes? What will we be left with?" Mayor Andersen said the Council could vote on the request, or wait until Council member Case was back in town and had the opportunity to read the minutes and see Mr. Hansen's presentation papers. Council member Gubler said if the City allowed set back changes for this, then it would open the door for litigation. Council President Shaw and Mayor Andersen disagreed, and said there was a difference between what was allowable in the R-T zone and the R-1 zone. Council President Shaw made a motion to postpone the decision until Council member Case had time to gather the facts and read the information presented. Council member McArthur seconded the motion. All were in favor. Meeting postponed for up to 45 days. Hearing Closed 8:50 p.m. 8 MONTHLY EXPENSE REPOT 2/28/2011 Amount Date Description ROCKY MTN POWER $ 2,628.86 ELECTRICITY /-10 ,1 DEPOT ,i9ii PUILDING [IATMIALS FIRST RESPONDERS $ 29.95 UNIFORM LARSEN REPAIR $ 256.00 02 TAHOE/DODGE SNOWPLOW IDAHO TRAFFIC SAFETY $ 219.18 SIGNS PREMIER VEHICLE $ 145.70 WIRELESS MIC DELTA DENTAL $ 384.60 DENTAL INSURANCE SUMMIT FINANCIAL $ 431.85 DOG SCOOPS HOLDEN KIDWELL $ 800.00 RETAINER VERIZON $ 196.39 PHONE JOEL KEYES $ 1,736.00 LABOR ALLEN ABOOD $ 1,000.00 BATHROOM REMODEL SHANNON BASARABA $ 9.50 MEETING PSI $ 53.25 GARBAGE HIGH COUNTRY R C & D $ 150.00 DUES IBSD $ 336.00 SEWER GALLS $ 353.56 EQUIPMENT -CLOTHING LAWN TECH $ 1,498.14 MAINTENANCE GAS CO $ 1,514.29 NATURAL GAS _INTERMOUNTAIN BLUE CROSS $ 2,798.77 HEALTH INSURANCE BONN CO SHERIFF $ 3,917.50 DISPATCH PETTY CASH $ 280.82 BUILDING MATERIALS/OFFICE SUPPLIES COMPUTER MEDICAL CTR $ 85.00 BATTERY BOB MCBRIDE $ 5,668.00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS POSTMASTER $ 535.92 WATER BILLS/2 MONTHS ACTION MOTOR SPORTS $ 26.45 4 WHEELER A T & T $ 1.70 PHONE KIRKHAM AUTO PARTS $ 11.24 PARTS TETON MICRO BIOLOGY $ 40.00 WATER TEST MICRO SERV $ 52.95 INTERNET WESTERN STATES EQUIP $ 91.13 PARTS CAL STORES $ 110.72 TOOL -PARTS _ UNITED MAILING $ 199.16 WATER BILLS FLEET SERVICES $ 300.58 FUEL AIC $ 45.00 ICCTFOA E IDA WATER RIGHTS COA $ 125.00 DUES FAIR POINT $ 289.00 PHONE 6-12 EZ MART $ 329.12 _FUEL BACKFLOW ASSM TESTING $ 850.95 TEST KITS $ 27,997.14 CITY OF IONA ** B U D G E T R E P O R T** FOR 02-28-11 PAGE 3 **** GENERAL FUND **** FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE ESTIMATED REVENUE ** R E C E I P T E D** UNRECEIPTED PERCENT MTD YTD BALANCE RECEIPTED 001 305.000 STATE HIGHWAY USERS 42,000.00 .00 23,547.47 18,452.53 001 310.000 STATE REVENUE SHARING 37,000.00 .00 21,506.99 15,493.01 001 315.000 STATE LIQUOR TAX 29,000 00 .00 19,047.15 9,952.85 001 320.000 BEER & DOG LICENSES 400 00 15.00 133.00 267.00 001 325.000 COURT REVENUE 12,000.00 391.05 3,119.51 8,880.49 001 330.000 INTEREST 400.00 38.32 143.21 256.79 001 335.000 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 5,000.00 4,708.40 4,708.40 291.60 001 340.000 NATURAL GAS FRANCHISE 12,000.00 .00 3,307.75 8,692.25 001 345.000 POWER FRANCHISE 15,700.00 .00 8,935.50 6,764.50 001 355.000 BUILDING RENT 6,000.00 690.00 3,893.75 2,106.25 001 357.000 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES 15,000.00 70.00 2,169.00 12,831.00 001 358.000 GRANTS 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00 001 360.000 PROPERTY TAX REVENUE 206,000.00 2,948.24 156,068.74 49,931.26 001 390.000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 6,000.00 588.12 1,388.34 4,611.66 001 395.000 RESERVES 60,000.00 .00 .00 60,000.00 56.07 58.13 65.68 33.25 26.00 35.80 94.17 27.56 56.91 64.90 14.46 75.76 23.14 **TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 451,500.00 9,449.13 247,968.81 203,531.19 54.92 **** GENERAL FUND **** ESTIMATED FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE EXPENSE ** E X P E N D E D** MTD YTD UNEXPENDED PERCENT BALANCE EXPENDED OIN 410.000 PAYROLL 57,000.00 7,740.00 300 4,342.66 18,244.00 67.99 42G.000 RETIREMENT 10,000.00 1,087.77 ,342.5,657.34 43.43 001 422.000 HEALTH INSURANCE 24,000.00 3,055.17 11,127.98 12,872.02 46.37 001 424.000 PAYROLL TAXES 11,000.00 684.85 4,562.88 6,437.12 41.48 001 440.000 ELECTRICITY - NATURAL GAS 24,000.00 2,629.12 9,762.84 14,237.16 40.68 001 445.000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 11,000.00 426.33 3,976.79 7,023.21 36.15 001 446.000 TRAVEL 5,000.00 .00 955.08 4,044.92 19.10 001 447.000 ADVERTISING 1,500.00 .00 140.50 1,359.50 9.37 001 450.000 INSURANCE LIABILITY 10,000.00 .00 4,455.00 5,545.00 44.55 001 455.000 LEGAL & AUDIT FEES 13,500.00 800.00 7,500.00 6,000.00 55.56 001 459.000 POLICE -PAYROLL 51,500.00 4,711.00 22,779.00 28,721.00 44.23 001 460.000 POLICE-COUNTY/DISPATCH 23,000.00 3,917.50 7,938.50 15,061.50 34.52 001 461.000 POLICE -RETIREMENT 5,500.00 487.03 2,633.56 2,866.44 47.68 001 462.000 POLICE -HEALTH INSURANCE 13,000.00 128.20 4,342.52 8,657.48 33.40 001 463.000 POLICE -TRAINING 2,000.00 9.50 1,254.67 745.33 62.73 001 464.000 POLICE -GENERAL 20,500.00 609.23 5,163.12 15,336.88 25.19 001 465.000 VEHICLE RENT 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00 001 470.000 MAINTENANCE 76,000.00 6,231.14 24,412.03 51,587.97 32.12 O01 472.000 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 8,000.00 5,668.00 8,982.00 982.00- 112.28 001 475.000 CIVIL DEFENSE .00 .00 .00 001 480.000 LIBRARY 2,000.00 .00 .00 2,000.00 001 485.000 LAND ACQUISITION 10,000.00 .00 .00 10,000.00 001 490.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 61,000.00 .00 12,632.13 48,367.87 20.71 001. 495.000 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 7,000.00 .00 5,038.74 1,961.26 71.98 et, **TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENSES 451,500.00 38,184.84 180,756.00 270,744.00 40.03 **NET EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY(-) 28,735.71- 67,212.81 67,212.81- CITY OF IONA ** B U D G E T R E P O R T* FOR 02-28-11 PAGE 5 **** WATER. FUND **** ESTIMATED * *RECEIPTED* UNRECEIPTED PERCENT FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE REVENUE MTD YTD BALANCE RECEIPTED 002 305.000 COLLECTIONS 165,000.00 14,243.50 78,752.08 86,247.92 002 310.000 HOOK UP FEES 45,000.00 .00 3,000.00 42,000.00 002 315.000 INTEREST 500.00 24.03 124.29 375.71 002 350.000 TANK REPLACEMENT FUND 50,000.00 .00 .00 50,000.00 002 356.000 GRANTS 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00 002 395.000 RESERVES 50,000.00 .00 .00 50,000.00 002 397.000 WATER BOND .00 .00 .00 47.73 6.67 24.86 **TOTAL WATER FUND REVENUE 315,500.00 14,267.53 81,876.37 233,623.63 25.95 **** WATER FUND **** ESTIMATED * *EXPENDED* * UNEXPENDED PERCENT FUND ACCOUNT4 ACCOUNT TITLE EXPENSE MTD YTD BALANCE EXPENDED 002 410.000 SALARIES & BENEFITS 63,000.00 .00 .00 63,000.00 002 440.000 ELECTRICITY 26,000.00 1,514.03 11,553.05 14,446.95 44.43 002 445.000 OFFICE, SUPPLIES, LEGAL 9,000.00 1,248.73 4,334.66 4,665.34 48.16 002 450.000 ENGINEERING COSTS 10,000.00 .00 2,235.00 7,765.00 22.35 002 460.000 VEHICLE EXPENSE .00 .00 .00 465.000 VEHICLE RENT 7,000.00 .00 .00 7,000.00 470.000 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 45,000.00 1,760.19 14,982.90 30,017.10 33.30 002 480.000 BOND PAYMENT .00 .00 .00 002 482.000 BOND INTEREST .00 .00 .00 002 485 000 TANK REPLACEMENT FUND 90,000.00 .00 .00 90,000.00 002 490.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 65,500.00 .00 18,953.00 46,547.00 28.94 002 497.000 WATER SYSTEM UPATE .00 .00 .00 **TOTAL WATER FUND EXPENSE 315,500.00 4,522.95 52,058.61 263,441.39 16.50 **NET EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY(-) 9,744.58 29,817.76 29,817.76- CITY OF IONA ** B UDGET R E P O R T** FOR 02-28-11 PAGE 6 (140 **** EQUIP REPLACEMENT **** ESTIMATED * *RECEIPTED* FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE REVENUE MTD YTD BALANCE RECEIPTED UNRECEIPTED PERCENT 003 305.000 EQUIP RENT --WATER 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00 003 310-000 EQUIP RENT --GENERAL 5,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00 003 395.000 EQUIP RESERVES --WATER 40,000.00 .00 .00 40,000.00 003 396.000 EQUIP RESERVES --GENERAL 40,000.00 .00 .00 40,000.00 **TOTAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT REVENUE 90,000.00 .00 .00 90,000.00 **** EQUIP REPLACEMENT **** FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE ESTIMATED ** E X P E N D E D** EXPENSE MTD YTD UNEXPENDED PERCENT BALANCE EXPENDED 003 410.000 EQUIP REPLACEMENT --WATER 45,000.00 .00 .00 45,000.00 003 415.000 EQUIP REPLACEMENT --GENERAL 45,000.00 .00 .00 45,000.00 003 490.000 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE .00 .00 .00 **TOTAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT EXPENSE 90,000.00 _00 .00 90,000.00 **NET EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY(-) .00 .00 .00 CITY OF IONA ** B U D G E T R E P O R T* FOR 02-28-11 PAGE 7 F� **** RECREATION FUND **** ESTIMATED * * R E C E I P T E D * * UNRECEIPTED PERCENT FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE REVENUE MTD YTD BALANCE RECEIPTED 004 305.000 BASEBALL FEES 16,000.00 .00 .00 16,000.00 004 310.000 SHELTER RENTAL 250.00 .00 50.00 200.00 20.00 004 320.000 WESTERN BOYS FEES 250.00 .00 .00 250.00 004 395.000 RESERVES .00 .00 .00 **TOTAL RECREATION FUND REVENUE 16,500.00 .00 50.00 16,450.00 .30 **** RECREATION FUND **** ESTIMATED * *EXPENDED* * UNEXPENDED PERCENT FUND ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT TITLE EXPENSE MTD YTD BALANCE EXPENDED 004 410.000 RECREATION EQUIPMENT 1,500.00 .00 .00 1,500.00 004 415.000 RECREATION LABOR 6,000.00 .00 .00 6,000.00 004 420.000 BASEBALL SUPPLIES 6,000.00 .00 .00 6,000.00 004 470.000 RECREATION MAINTENANCE 3,000.00 .00 .00 3,000.00 **TOTAL RECREATION FUND EXPENSE 16,500.00 .00 .00 16,500.00 **NET EXCESS OR DEFICIENCY(-) .00 50.00 50.00- CITY OF IONA BANK REPORT DATE 02/28/11 BANK OF COMMERCE GENERAL CHECKING $ 30,018.00 WATER CHECKING $ 12,736.00 GENERAL SAVINGS $ 205,954.00 WATER SAVINGS $ 151,594.00 KEY BANK GENERAL SAVINGS $ 157,041.00 WATER SAVINGS $ 52,347.00 WELLS FARGO WATER SAVINGS $ 51,846.00 MERRILL LYNCH GENERAL SAVINGS $ 101,027.00 L '' re°0 q No lf) lf; r.) N 314� 3141,E S 3113 3077 .. 3075 �. /V 3053 1J 3051 ' , 3017 L_ 3015 col cl)I N i 4/00 C 1 iONA ROAD (3300 NORTH) 3 1 3142 3140 • 3122 —7 3120 3082', rfe0 3080 3 C ii, r . -a ---4— t '• �� 1 ;-� . �Y; n � N U O cs-.),c r\� d- d- <,(:� d d- 3111 3109 cN N QUAKY ASPEN DRIVE DENNING AVE 13022 G CN 0 N CO COO d d- 3 20 6 i 2 _Ay I 2Z 28 29 I N. N � N. ,, _4, - r) r 23 _ 39 476.3 467.5 <'>_____4707 4721 <> 4741� WEIGEL CIRCLE 4 77u cx� - de_ -5 i I 0 / 0i c-jj / lid / 2\ • III v mc9mv PPP-4 oP A 2ZDA OO�ti y �ti�Z r_wAm Z znmin u D om 3053 3075 3077 I 3711 I I 3113 -- - ..-.._ _..- -- -.. SAG -BR S 3080 3082 C RCS 3147 O c C kWf DEVELOPMENT 15 MAR 2011 PROPOSED PATIO HOME PLACMENTS MOUNTAIN RIDGE SUB —DIVISION BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO "Google Maps ragcivii ma ps t? To see all the details that are visible on the screen, use the "Print" link next to the map. Find Tag Show All - animals architecture art autumn beach bridge building buildings castle church city clouds flowers hdr lake landscape mountain mountains nature night panorama park people river sea sky snow summer sunset travel trees water winter Upload your photos to Panoramio View photos in Google Earth http://maps.google.com/maps?ftr=earth.promo&hl=en&utm_campaign=en&utm medium... 3/15/2011 Google Maps reigc rriaps Use Earth view to see maps in 3D To see all the details that are visible on the screen, use the "Print" link next to the map. Watch our video to learn more or click the Download button to get started. http://maps.google.com/maps?ftr=earth.promo&h1=en&utm_campaign=en&utm_medium... 3/15/201 1 1Pt bttD://wvvn/.oinoinoadb0mcSShovvoame.onM/vvn-onntcnthUnlnudn/2O08/04/ruo http://activerain.com/image store/uploads/3/1/9/2/5/ar128541927252913.ip2 3/1 /2011 .1,••••••••!• -- •• ,,,,oppeat. am. • •• ssia tiF56 5167 5162 4912 5117 , 5... ------------------ 4960 4980 E 4 -1-47 • :••• • I- • --IS _N 3S -10--- N0Z61'00 N 00'02E L99'901 L99'901 101 L99'901 L99'901 L99'901 L01 IL IL 3ZELE'00 N 32ELE'00N LE'0ZE c RESOLUTION NO.2011-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IONA, IDAHO, AUTHORIZING BACKFLOW PERVENTION INSPECTION FEE. WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the City of Iona to provide water that meets Idaho State water quality standards to all consumers occupying or visiting the City of Iona's premises; WHEREAS, it is the City of Iona's responsibility to prevent the contamination of the public water system from the source of supply (i.e., to the customer's connection to the service pipe or meter); WHEREAS, the City of Iona also owns the facilities and the plumbing systems that deliver the water to the consumers. WHEREAS, it is a requirement of the State of Idaho for the of Iona to establish a cross -connection control program; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and the Council of the City of Iona, that the City of Iona hereby authorizes the implication of a fee set forth below for any backflow prevention inspection performed on private property. $ The administrative staff of the City is authorized to take all necessary steps to carry out the authorization provided by this Resolution. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL March15, 2011 SIGNED BY THE MAYOR Brad D. Andersen, Mayor ATTEST: Robyn Keyes, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS THE CITY COUNCIL MEETS THE THIRD TUESDAY OF EACH MONTH AT 7:00 P.M. AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATED AT 3548 NORTH MAIN STREET, IONA. 2011 SCHEDULE AS FOLLOWS: JANUARY 1 gTH FEBRUARY 15TH MARCH 15TH APRIL 19TH MAY 1 NTH JUNE 2 gTH DULY 19TH AUGUST 16TH SEPTEMBER 20TH OCTOBER 1 gTH NOVEMBER 15TH DECEMBER Meeting will be held from 5:30-6:30 20TH Any person needing special accommodations to participate in the above noticed meeting should contact the City Office at least one day before the meeting at 523-5600 Notice of Public Hearing The City of Iona's City Council, and Planning and Zoning Commission has scheduled a public hearing on the evening of March 9, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. at the Iona Community Center, which is located at 3548 North Main Street, Iona, Idaho. The purpose of the hearing is to consider an amendment to the Residential Town home (R-T) zone to allow patio homes. A second public hearing is scheduled for the evening of March 15, 2011 at 7:30 P.M. at the Community Center with the City Council for final review. If you have any comments concerning this amendment, they will be considered at the public hearing. Comments may be made in writing, but must be received by the City Clerk seven (7) days before the public hearing. Any person needing special accommodations to participate in the above noticed meeting should contact the City Office the day before the meeting at 523-5600 RobyKey City Clerk Published: February 22, 2011