Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes_CCWorkMeeting_06282011CITY COUNCIL WORK MEETING JUKE 28, 2011 6:00 P.M. IONA COMMUNITY CENTER PRESENT: Mayor Brad Andersen, Council President Jane Shaw, Council member Dennis McArthur, Council member Dan Gubler, Public Works Supervisor Zech Prouse, Police Chief Shannon Basaraba, City Clerk Robyn Keyes. ABSENT: Council member Bruce Case Visitors: Derik Sharp Emergency Operations Plan. The Council received training for the Emergency Operations Plan regarding the multi -jurisdiction all hazard mitigation plan. The training included the planning process, City description, public involvement, risk assessment, and land use planning/disaster mitigation integration. The Council noted that some of the City statistics were incorrect with the plan. Mr. Sharp said he would make the appropriate changes. Mayor Andersen asked Clerk Keyes to check with the City's risk management insurance regarding flood plain insurance. Clerk Keyes said she would. Meeting adjourned 6:55 p.m. Attachment 4: City of Iona Individual Jurisdiction Plan Preface The City of Iona All Hazard Mitigation Plan was developed in early 2011. It contains information relative to the hazards and vulnerabilities facing the City of Iona. This plan is designed to interface with the Bonneville Coutny Multi -Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan published in 2009 and the State of Idaho Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan published in November, 2007. Reserved for FEMA Approval 5 Notice of Endorsement and Participation In the The City of Iona Multi -Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan I, , Mayor for the City of Iona agree to endorse and participate in the implementation of the Bonneville Multi -Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan as it applies to the City of Iona. DATED this day of , 2011. CITY OF IONA By: Mayor Received by the City Clerk this day of , 2011. Signature: Clerk 7 Section 1: Planning Process Introduction The City of Iona, Idaho is vulnerable to natural and technological (man-made) hazards that threaten the health, welfare, and security of its residents. The cost of response to, and recovery from disasters, and the potential for loss of life or property, can be lessened when attention is turned to mitigating their impacts before they occur or re -occur. This All Hazard Mitigation Plan (AHMP) seeks to identify the City's hazards, and to understand their impacts on vulnerable populations and infrastructure. With that understanding, the Plan sets forth solutions that, if implemented, have the potential to significantly reduce the threat to life and property. The Plan is based on the premise that hazard mitigation works! With increased attention to managing hazards, communities can reduce existing threats, and through proper land use and community planning, can avoid creating new problems in the future. Such solutions can often be implemented at minimal cost and social impact. This is not an emergency response/management plan, although it can certainly be used to identify weaknesses in, and improve such planning. But while preparations to deal with disasters after they have occurred is an important strategy, the focus of this plan is to support decision making and the implementation of projects that will reduce the impact of disasters before they occur. Such actions can both reduce existing risk exposure and avoid creating new exposures. The Planning Process used to develop this Plan mirrors the process detailed in Section 1 of the Bonneville County Multi -Jurisdiction All Hazard mitigation Plan. Plan Use The Plan should be used to help City officials plan, design, and implement programs and projects that will help reduce vulnerability to natural and technological (man-made) hazards. The Plan should also be used to facilitate inter jurisdictional coordination and collaboration related to all hazard mitigation planning and implementation within the City and at the regional level. Finally, the Plan should be used to develop or provide guidance for local emergency response planning. If adopted, this Plan will achieve compliance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. Hazard Mitigation Hazard mitigation is defined as cost-effective actions that have the effect of reducing, limiting, or preventing the vulnerability of people, culture, property, and the environment to potentially damaging, harmful, or costly hazards. Hazard mitigation measures that can be used to eliminate or minimize risk fall into three categories: 1) Those that keep the hazard away from people, property, and structures, 2) Those that keep people, property, or structures away from the hazard, and 3) Those that reduce the impact of the hazard on victims, e.g., insurance. 9 Hazard mitigation measures must be practical, cost effective, and culturally, environmentally, and politically acceptable. Actions taken to limit the vulnerability of society to hazards must not, in themselves, be more costly than the anticipated damages. Hazard mitigation planning must be based on vulnerabilities and its primary focus must be on the point where capital investment and land use decisions are made. The placement of capital investments, whether for homes, roads, public utilities, pipelines, power plants, or public works, det-imine to a large extent the nature and degree of a community's hazard vulnerability. Once a capital facility is in place, there is little opportunity to reduce hazard vulnerability through correction of errors in location or construction. It is for this reason that often the most effective mitigation tools are zoning and other ordinances that manage development in high vulnerability areas, and building codes that ensure that new buildings are constructed to withstand the damaging forces of anticipated hazards. Purpose The purposes of this plan are: • Fulfill Federal and local mitigation planning responsibilities, • Promote pre- and post -disaster mitigation measures with short- and long-range strategies to minimize suffering, loss of life, impact on traditional culture, and damage to property and the environment, • Eliminate or minimize conditions that would have an undesirable impact on the people, culture, economy, environment, and well-being of the City at large, and • Enhance elected officials', departments', and the public's awareness of the threats to the community's way of life, and of what can be done to prevent or reduce the vulnerability and risk. Scope This Plan covers the areas within the City of Iona Idaho. Mission Statement The City of Iona All Hazards Mitigation Plan proposes public policy designed to protect citizens, critical facilities, infrastructure, private and public property, the local economy, and the environment from risks associated with natural and technological (manmade) hazards. Goals The goals of the AHMP describe the broad direction that the City of Iona agencies, organizations, and citizens will take to select mitigating projects that are designed specifically to address risks posed by natural and technological (manmade) hazards. The goals are stepping- stones between the mission statement and the specific objectives developed for the individual mitigation projects. Severe Weather • The City of Iona will develop methods to mitigate losses due to severe weather. 10 Flooding • The City of Iona will continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program and in addition will develop actions to reduce damage to City infrastructure due to flash and stream flooding and/or flooding caused by dam failures. Geological • The City of Iona will reduce potential damage to City infrastructure and structures through implementation of earthquake mitigation techniques. • The City of Iona will reduce the potential damage to property from landslides by adopting codes and standards for construction in landslide prone areas. Wildfire • The City of Iona will reduce wildfire impacts by continuing the Wildland Urban Interface Mitigation Program. Biological • The City of Iona will seek to reduce the exposure of humans and animals to the West Nile Virus. Structural Fire • The City of Iona will work with property owners in an effort to prevent or reduce losses from structure fires. Nuclear Event • The City of Iona will examine the risks associated with nuclear facilities at the Idaho National Laboratory. Hazardous Material Event • The City of Iona will seek to identify hazardous material flow through the City. Riot/Demonstration/Civil Disorder • The City of Iona will develop methods to identify and report civil disobedience activities. Terrorism • The City of Iona will identify measures to protect critical City infrastructure and facilities from potential terror incidents. 11 City of Iona All Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee The City of Iona All Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee was formed on Feburary 18, 2011. Committee membership is comprised of representatives from the City of Iona elected officials and department heads. The Committee Roster is provided below: Agency Representative Position E-mail 12 Section 2: City of Iona Description The City of Iona is located in Bonneville County in southeastern Idaho. Iona is seven miles northeast of the City of Idaho Falls and 2.0 miles north of the city of Ammon. The City of Iona sits at an elevation of 4782 feet. Iona consists of .79 square miles of land and 0 square miles of water. Iona was established by Mormon pioneers in 1884. The area had such a short growing season that many settlers wanted to return to Utah; however, after an encouraging speech by Mormon apostle Wilford Woodruff they stayed and saw the area prosper. Settlers began to build fences and dig water ditches. The Eagle Rock and Willow Creek Canal Company organized to convey water from the Snake River to the natural channel of Willow Creek. Through the development of ditches and canal companies the arid sage brush expanse has become an economic base for thousands of people. Demographics: The City reported a population of 1,359 residents in July of 2009; this number constitutes an increase of 13.2% from the 2000 US Census Report. The median age of resident has been slowly increasing from 31.8 in the year 2000 to 33.4 years in 2009. Of the total population of Iona 65.4% are married and 6.5% are widowed. The City is made up of 85.5% family households while another 2.2% live with unmarried partners. The racial makeup of the city includes; 98.42% white/Caucasian, 0.08% African American, 0.17% Native American and 0.83% from other races. Households in Iona consist of an average 3.2 people while the average family size is 3.55. There are an estimated 400 housing units in the City with approximately 30 of these being rental properties. The majority of housing units are owner occupied. The median household income in 2009 was reported to be $45,258. The estimated per capita . income was $17,103. Iona had a low poverty rate with only 7.6% of the population living below the poverty level. Iona Elementary School, located in Iona, is part of the Bonneville Joint School District. Students are bused to middle schools and high schools within the district in neighboring Idaho Falls or Ammon. Topography & Geography: When pioneers first entered the Iona area they saw a vast sagebrush covered desert. While these desert areas still exist in small amounts in the western portion of Bonneville County, the eastern portion of the County has become an agricultural area. The City of Iona is located in this agricultural area. This agricultural area is bordered by the Caribou-Targhee National Forest. The Caribou Range of mountains lines the southern portion of the city and county. The Caribou landscape is interspersed with dense stands of pine and fir trees, rolling green meadows, and compact aspen groves. The Snake River passes Iona first on the western side of the city and then takes a northeasterly turn and runs several miles above the city. Geology: The geology of the city of Iona is characterized as mountainous. The area consists of sandstone, shale, mudstone and mixed miogeosynclinal. There are several normal and thrust faults throughout the Caribou Mountains. The Snake River Fault runs west of the Snake River along 13 the shore of Palisades Reservoir to the south of the City of Iona. The Absaroka Thrust runs northeast of the City of Iona. The Grand Valley Fault is further east of Iona in the extreme northeast corner of Bonneville County. Climate: The average high temperature in Iona ranges from 20` in December and January to 70` from mid -June to mid -September. Average low temperatures range from 10` in December and January to 50* in July. In contrast the average high temperature in July is a reported 85.8* F. The climate in Iona is mild with an average July afternoon reaching 25% humidity while the average humidity in January is 79%. The mountainous area to the east of Iona receives more precipitation than areas to the west of Iona. Iona receives an average of 10-14 inches of precipitation annually. Economic Profile: The city of Iona is located in Bonneville County which is becoming increasingly diversified as a hub for retail trade, medical and other services which are consumer and client based. The economy's stability is based, at least partly, on the presence of the National Engineering Laboratory. The leading industries in Iona are education, health, and social services. Professional, scientific, administrative and waste management industries play a large role in the cities economy as well. According to "Job Trend" from Simply Hired.com the City of Iona has seen a minimal climb in employment from May of 2010 to early January of 2011. The unemployment rate in Iona for the year 2010 was reported to be 6.0%. 14 Section 3: Public Involvement Public Involvement Public Involvement in the All Hazard Mitigation Process has three distinct objectives; documenting risk perception, development of risk reduction requirements, and solicitation of support for mitigation actions. Information gathering tools were utilized to gain a subjective measure of how the public believes the risks impact their community. These results were then used to assist in the development of requirements for risk reduction projects. This involvement of the public serves to validate and raise awareness of the planning process and, thus, generate support for elected and appointed officials as they seek to implement the mitigation actions identified in the AHMP. Risk Perception Risk perception is the subjective judgment that people make about the characteristics and severity of a risk. The phrase is most commonly used in reference to natural hazards and threats to the environment or health, such as nuclear power. Several theories have been proposed to explain why different people make different estimates of the dangerousness of risks. Risk Perception is a significant part of the Public Involvement Section of the City of Iona All Hazard Mitigation Planning Process. A public meeting was used to gather public input and to measure, at least subjectively, the public attitudes towards the risk posed by the hazards in the City. The more quantitative Committee Perception Tool was used to assess the expertise of the members of the All Hazard Mitigation Committee. Committee Perception Tool Members of the All Hazard Mitigation Committee in reality play two important roles. First, in the role of agency representative, each member; 1) ensures that the interests of their agency are expressed and included in the planning process, 2) acts as a subject matter expert on issues and matters managed by the agency, and, 3) identifies methods to reduce or mitigate risk. Second, each member serves as an individual with certain expertise, but also with certain attitudes, knowledge, and biases that Funeer heal Floes FbMr Iio.raoolooe: oealertWa totals rta,a..,.,ln,.Y..e Nyde r order... . u+mrulnrlarge 400olorroti000 Stote *kit.. Menlo t.e. al.eeh... Terrort.ao TlwWrneerar. 16.00o rms.1.10)0rolnp. 11.01. Nina. ant TttaNrra V What is the probability (%) that the hazard event will occur in the County In the neat ten years? (Mark 1 for each hazard) What would be the Impact or Conesquence If the hazard event did Occur? (Mark 1 for each hazard) 10 30 10 JO 10 EO .G SO 90 WO Lane A61 Its ar O 0 0.--0._0 0 0 0 0 c `. 0 o0 0 c Dom Wore)-- -c 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 o a 0 0 0 000000000'. 0 0 0 0 0 Yarlhgoolioo 0 c 0 0 6 0 o-0?C ZS; 0 d Zj —0 C. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O- o 0; O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O` O O O O O 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 O C c 0 O ,0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 C 0 C.0 00 O..O O D..O. O O'..._0 0 0 _ O. C O q 0 _0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O -• 00 000 00 o O? a O 0 O 00 OO O_C 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0! O coo o o o o o O o': c c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: O 0 O 0 0 O a o O rnk M 10,..a l it. l.,YY.SY. ♦LE -sorerp lama a moo so 6.101 /40 .0e6401Cr7.n)of ulr O c 15 qualify them as excellent "expressers" of public perception. A Risk Perception Tool was used in the first committee meeting to measure the committee members' perception of the likelihood of hazard occurrence and of the severity of the impact from those hazards upon their own personal life situations. An example of the Perception Tool is shown in Figure 3.1. Meeting Minutes and are briefly summarized below. The five hazards most likely to occur, as perceived by the Committee, were: 1) INSERT 2) INSERT 3) INSERT 4) INSERT 5) INSERT The five hazards that would have the greatest impact on the community, as perceived by the Committee, were: 1) INSERT 2) INSERT 3) INSERT 4) INSERT 5) INSERT Public Meetings TO BE COMPLETED 16 Section 4: Risk Assessment Hazard Definitions Hazards that pose a threat to human life, health, and well-being are myriad and no attempt is made here to compile an exhaustive list. Those that are addressed in disaster planning are generally categorized as "natural" or "technological" (sometimes "manmade"). The FEMA website lcontains a thorough discussion of hazards in the section entitled "FEMA's Multi -Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (MHIRA)". 2 Studies were conducted to determine which hazards are of concern in the City of Iona. Data used to compile this Risk Assessment is found in Section 4 of the Bonneville County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. Hazards that have been identified as significant in this City and that will be considered in this plan are: Natural Hazards Weather: Drought Extreme Heat Extreme Cold Severe Winter Storm Lightning Hail Tornado Straight Line Wind Flooding: Flash Flood River Flooding Dam Failure Geologic: Earthquake Other: Wildfire Biological Pandemic/Epidemic SRS Bird Flu West Nile Virus Technological (Manmade) Hazards Structural Fire Hazardous Material Event Nuclear Event Riot/Demonstration/Civil Disorder Terrorism http://www.fema.gov/index.shtm 2 http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/fhm/ft_mhira.shtm 17 Section 4.1 Weather Hazards The impact of weather hazards may be widespread (drought) or more localized (lightning), but all have the potential to be severe and directly life -threatening. Historical weather data is generally available in good detail over long time periods, allowing for reasonably accurate risk assessment for planning purposes. Drought Repetitive Loss: The City of Iona experiences repetitive loss to due to drought. Losses are related primarily to the crop production loss and the associated economics. i �'^�' - 3 � � ' � { I b ��}h�a� 4^'�� 5� y 2 �Y. ���{ Fr!'���p'w. � "�" � '• £ Value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography (Area)' Affected Expected Bodily Harm Lass Estiatate Range Population Sheltering Required Warning ; Lead Times' 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s No Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10 000 000s Relocation Required Minutes Drought has a magnitude score of 13. N x Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM < 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 18 Extreme Heat Repetitive Loss: None �M.w�EFe�St"-d=�13�uu�fe, t 7 4 '* 5 E 'L� ('•°�. W, q �f�'YM Value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography (Area) Affeeted Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range • Pbpulaloa Sheltering Required Warning Lead Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10 000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help bays 4 State Multiple Secfions Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Extreme Heat has a magnitude score of 11. . ,, Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 19 Extreme Cold Repetitive Loss: None AF"4 '�,ti Value 1 ., b+aG y q 'r'..x.k why', ..:` ba. $nt, :.iAyi. Reconstruction Assistance From aG t Geography f Area ' Affected; ...a 9...wM Expected Bodily Harm fit }h c�_ "..EF.h..Axsw.r4%ASp. Lost Estimate Range frvYibi"`:.k"ra.�"cx`"`' i'.."{sm�'Ws. i.. Population Sheltering Required '::� ..x?a .x+•m4 K'. Warning + Lead Times, 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s No Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10 000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help '' Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Extreme Cold has a magnitude score of 11. w ,... , Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to' Hasn't' Happened 20 Severe Winter Storm Repetitive Loss: None #. a kyf % i�.. L,. � e" , '. T i"�'" i.•v :."Y a'F' s * ',": � Wi �. v3.,x s?s� d.`� YT`"i v" Yb JR. :: f TiTkjkµ a, +,'$"� � P .Y^.. .. 9+.,. w� .4u. L... •ALL.. ^q^ ce *+ value Reconstruction Assistance From GeegraphY (Area) Affected Expected B©dily Harm Loss Estimate Range _ PopWattion Sheltering Required Warning Lead Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10000s , Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Severe Winter Storms have a magnitude score of 14. 1 a Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 21 Lightning Repetitive Loss: None $,m a ! ' d 1 value "2My;.;d° man d , i t Y �g�a�3 Reconstruction Assistance From ,qM,„ rr yk",? R.. d ? '��e,Y'°,�+'�dY;r'=i�a' "u"r`��!>^�' Geography (Area) ` Affected m<g,. y #w�' } .r„`*�d Expected Bodily Harm ¢� � +"'.;t r," Loss Estimate Range G ��,�*� Population Sheltering Required �S� yjaC Warning Lead 'Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s No Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10 000 000s Relocation Required Minutes Lightning has a magnitude score of 10. Ranking r Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years` MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 22 Hail Repetitive Loss: None ! %, 1� i4� i .,. �� i d'w.,.tA ,rE «'�"p$n'�a t7 y'Yy, .:. �+.>k K.,h.R +�,^.'`,'Dn+s3hi�"Mry'` �.y3 %r.��f:V 'Value. Reconstruction°$py Assistance From (Area) Affected Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range �'opWation Sheltering Required *Warning Lead Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s No Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,OOOs Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Hail has a magnitude score of 11. ,�. d l u;' ";., "�' Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to'5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 23 Tornado Repetitive Loss: None Value �.. 4p q r,a . ��•. g n..',. Reconstruction Assistance From r � f � .��� � ��` Geography (Area) Affected �_ m b� ..�" �S. �s��0'd'Si - ExpectedBodily Harm � "Sf c A Loss Estimate Range # i �i Population Sheltering Required y ��$6� Sy, t fit. a` `'� Warni ig Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries �th Little to No with Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Tornados have a magnitude score of 12. Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 24 rts Straight Line Wind Repetitive Loss: None 1 P.. °yN i. C.r N'bYMM tt LLVy 3 EY.. '^@d".Y. �iiL,kw .�4 +�.sF {�f i'��d+'#,i.#�.✓�rwl.�.n�}, C A' d C} g^ j 4 i •4 �wl'fk,�v�.«;4 a";!d��� .ih�.,'::,d�'k'a:71 "..SLl�^ P«�uc..+'"5. v. ,���'t v".�wini�3r�`�. „Lir .3 #i% y� @"»tz�y+}S. A r^..' `.,... ���'�"�."&:,. .. Value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography _ (Area)';, Affected Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range population Sheltering Required Warning Lead Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO ` Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s - Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Straight Line wind has a magnitude score of 11. ' .. - .. Description Ranking HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 25 Section 4.2 Flood Hazards Flash Flood Repetitive Loss: None i9% �N wy£ N 4 k 1 J' 9 .qp "k: 4 uu 9 4� � PRd l69y 4 { kV ,.� � N' Geography (Area) = Affected k �:, } r�.. � m ��1 "�M• `V 7✓ytS 'Ai Expected Bodily Harm c M^ 3 ' 4"a^IA d k Th'':X'�5at K.? L ra NSw �R`"�f�q!�y{�"'�1°¢1."'Nf 4avw p Loss Estimate Range d ; �' A �' y,.,,,.y. ifY , y��R^Sc(q Pt►puiaton Sheltering Required +� . •�i �_T' �Z � Yi Warning Lead Times Value Reconstruction Assistance From 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group off Parcels Multiple Injuries Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10 000 000s Relocation Required Minutes Flash Flood has a magnitude score of 12. Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 26 r4 River or Stream Flooding Repetitive Loss: None Reconstruction Assistance From �^. Geography (Area) Affected J g;�. xgy �.1 , Expected Bodily; Harm to 5f " e^.,w :a. Loss Estimate Range kg,.",•,'*,. ° +�� P°pulat on Sheltering R aired a� t.. Warning Lead Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $ I00,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Hel. Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Flooding has a magnitude score of 11. Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened NFIP Participation Iona participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and is not under any suspension or revocation from participation in the NFIP. An important advantage to being part of the NFIP is the availability of low cost flood insurance for those homes and businesses within designated floodplains or areas subject to flooding that are not designated as Special Flood Hazard Areas. NFIP Entry Date: 6/30/1976 CAV Date: None Current Map Date: None (All Zone C & X) Policies in Force: 0 FIRM Status: 6/30/1976 Total Insurance ($): $0 Initial FIRM: 11/16/1973 No. Paid Losses: 0 CRS: No Total Losses ($): $0 27 Dam Failure Repetitive Loss: None , Value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography (Area) Affected Expected' Bodily' Harm Loss Estimate Range Population Sheltering Required Warning Dead Tunes' 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10 000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few' ' Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Dam Failure has a magnitude score of 40. y Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25,Years to Hasn't Happened 28 Section 4.3 Geologic Hazards Earthquake Repetitive Loss: None a.. `Fs"�, .:. P'ti t. aaF',*F$Pr`#''.S�.0 •F. v.:V.fe'NrS.rSltSes'Ay -: '$fbb'}'d'"' q.� Y�2 r' �',+t.a�'"."..vJ �.:^5i:u° *m v , MR''4a: i.. value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography (Area) Affected Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range Population Sheltering Required Warning Lead Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries f Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10 000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering' Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Earthquake has a magnitude score of 36. -". k. �..r r �.. Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 29 Section 4.4 Other Natural Hazards Wildfire Repetitive Loss: None �Y�,.ua. �,.?;R.,sa2s� „awx,.. ...�. ,• � �r� �"m r ., f �: *u�., re 1(+" �i :�. e,v� `k-. "i3Td -°�° �?�:,�",`..�. � r:-.. value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography (Area) Affected Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range Population. Sheltering Required Warning - Lead Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10 OOOs Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10 000 000s Relocation Required Minutes Wildland Fire has a magnitude score of 16. Frequency of Wildland Fire Hazard ,ry HIGH" Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 30 Biological Repetitive Loss: None rvS. (( xrb dv" rvF . 1 , 1 dk5 � c"�� �',u3 A,4'� � y,i �3 ✓.df+"�p#a6 �a,.;i✓,�+. r .k .{,ry7 �"_.'°ip. n Value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography (Area) Affected Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range Population Sheltering Required Warning Lead Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Communicable Disease Outbreak has a magnitude score of 19. Ranldng Description , HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 31 West Nile Virus Repetitive Loss: None C� '� wS.Y , �i„yj Lf J`aq $*'a+yC't`x�k Yd.F'�a � ur ��a��'9'v"1�, yiX . ``�,^'dS✓p��&••Y�'¢",... ^'Ni , w: "; '. '$ Value Reconstruction° Assistance From aphy (Area) Affected Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range Population Sheltering Required Warning Lead Times; 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s No Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10 000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death - $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes West Nile Virus has a magnitude score of 7. . Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 32 Section 4.5 Manmade/Technological Hazards Structural Fire Repetitive Loss: None Y `F' .,:' A 4 zA' "'Y # kW { {" !x Wx'a�a' 7:�b �71` � a y3 P '"t, v�"•+r"n�'�' ��tl ML.'" u'A L !"�...«:1d a � y %�.... ;>.+i�5-4... e4 5 1 cs` g> i. 4 k ;, ^.qg Fe.• g_4 �, . n,+^t.,5 _ LG", � 3,�.'S.': �s�yY .;.t u4' Cv. V,t M a %'Y 1. � P iaSJ.'� aN'v�i . 4a"��• '�.��'9`ieK'..u^r°t Warning Lead Times- , Value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography (Area) Affected Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range Population Sheltering Required 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of ParcelsMedical Multiple Injuries With Little to No Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Structural Fire has a magnitude score of 14. s . Ranking Descx ptiott HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 33 Hazardous Material Event Repetitive Loss: None ��k�y#Rf'tlFtia� p*�fi 1 ) a��Ci� p�: tir a •+` 3 >`� i ^ "ate" i� tq'�y�ry� 1` Value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography (Area) Affected Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range Population Sheltering Required Warning, . Lead` Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death 000s $10,ks Little Sheltering Wee 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required/ Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10 000 000s Relocation Required Minutes Hazardous Materials has a magnitude score of 20. :... Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 34 Nuclear Event Repetitive Loss: None rvYa, atiaoYx.1 x ^ k.. .. r° .. r""�. .su1"�. .,�,,ieJ,ra..:"sdt":a..YwT.��4«4Pc..$rd'u'r"�::r'e`.ssxs"� Cd +� Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range Population Sheltering Required Warning Lead Times Value Reconstruction Assistance From Geography (Area) Affected 1 Family Parcel Little to No �J Y / No Death $1000s No Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000 000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Nuclear has a magnitude score of 21. Ranlzng Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 35 Riot/Demonstration/Civil Disorder Repetitive Loss: None .' Value Reconstruction Assistance From Ge°P� a- (Area) Affected Expected Bodily Harm Loss Estimate Range Population Sheltering Required Warning Lead' Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Riot/Demonstration/Civil Disobedience has a magnitude score of 11. Ranking Description HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 36 Terrorism Repetitive Loss: None u 5 �.;t''� ,33tA�. f.�.�C. arS'�.1}fi ,f�F,7. ?,z'' IVY'I.0 Valve Reconstruction Assistance From Geography ;(Area) Affected Expected Bodily. Harm Loss Estimate Range Population Sheltering Required Warning Lead Times 1 Family Parcel Little to No Injury / No Death $1000s NO Sheltering Months 2 City Block or Group of Parcels Multiple Injuries with Little to No Medical Care / No Death $10,000s Little ' Sheltering Weeks 2 County Section or Numerous Parcels Major Medical Care Required / Minimal Death $100,000s Sheltering Requiring Neighboring Counties Help Days 4 State Multiple Sections Major Injuries / Requires Help from Outside County / A Few Deaths $1,000,000s Long Term Sheltering Effort Hours 8 Federal County Wide Massive Casualties / Catastrophic $10,000,000s Relocation Required Minutes Terrorism has a magnitude score of 24. I)e cripdon Ranldng HIGH Multiple Times a Year to 5 Years MEDIUM 5 to 25 Years LOW' 25 Years to Hasn't Happened 37 Section 4.6 Vulnerabilities Critical Facilities The following table lists the City of Iona's critical facilities with their associated value and address. These facilities were analyzed as the risk assessment was developed. 3670 Main Street Art Building $175,000 Bleachers and Shelter $20,000 3548 Main Street Community Shelter $723,240 West Rockwood Equipment Storage Bldg $100,000 280 Rockwood Fire Station $51,818 Picnic Shelter $5,000 270 Rockwood Storage Building $30,000 Nest Rockwood Ave Well House $35,000 East Iona Butte Well House $30,000 East Rockwood Ave Total Value Well House $10,000 S1.180,058 38 00° oiN Section 4.7 Risk Summary The following chart illustrates the risk ranking of hazards for the City of Iona Those hazards with the highest magnitude and frequency are found in the red boxes in the lower right hand corner. Those hazards with the lowest magnitude and frequency are found in the green boxes in the upper left hand corner of the chart. (Low) 1 U 0 (Medium) cr cu 2 w (High) 3 (Low) 1 Magnitude (Medium) 2 (High) 3 Drought Flash Flood Tornado Hail Lightning Straight Line Wind wIe virus Nuclear Terrorism Repetitive Loss: The City of Iona does not have any NFIP repetitive loss properties. There are routine losses caused by a number of other hazards, but they are not repetitive. 39 40 Section 5: Land Use Planning/Disaster Mitigation Integration This section of the Plan examines the relationship between the City's Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Ordinances, and the AHMP. Incorporating hazard mitigation practices into land Use planning is extremely important as future developments are planned and constructed. Through proper planning the risk to property owners can be reduced and future disaster related economic losses avoided. City of Iona Comprehensive Plan The City of Iona Comprehensive Plan was last updated in November 2007. Overall the plan supports the goals of this Plan with a few minor exceptions. Chapter 9 of the Comprehensive Plan deals with Hazardous Areas and Natural Hazards. This plan will serve as a primary source to augment this section of the Comprehensive Plan when it is revised in the future. City of Iona Land Use/Zoning Ordinances The City of Iona has a adopted the International Building Code, and enforces its provisions. Recommendations In order to ensure that the risk assessment provided in this plan is integrated with other planning documents, including the City Comprehensive Plan, and land use ordinances it is recommended that: • The Hazard Profiles and Risk Assessment in this Plan be incorporated into the next update of the City Comprehensive Plan. • The City of Iona continues participation in the NFIP and reviews their floodplain ordinance to ensure that it meets and/or exceeds FEMA requirements. • The City of Iona designate Wildland Urban Interface areas as a special land use category. • The City of Iona Review their Land Use Ordinance and make changes to reflect the risk posed by natural and manmade hazards as analyzed in this Plan. 41 42