HomeMy Public PortalAbout9.6.2005 Planning Board Agenda & MinutesTown
AGENDA
PLANNING BOARD
gh Tuesday, September 6, 2005
7:00 PM, Town Barn
®1994 Tovm of Hillsborough
ITEM #1: Call to order and confirmation of a quorum.
ITEM #2: Adoption of July public hearing and August regular meeting minutes
ITEM #3: Additions to the agenda & agenda adjustment.
ITEM #4: Committee reports and updates
• Board of Adjustment
• Parks and Recreation Board
• Churton Street Corridor
ITEM #5: Interview volunteer to fill in town vacancy
Action requested: Recommendation of action to Town Board
ITEM #6: Discuss creating Town Code provisions regulating the location of newsracks
Action requested: Discussion
ITEM #7: Discussion of potential amendments to the noise provisions in the Zoning
Ordinance and Town Code for improved consistency and applicability.
Action requested: Discussion
ITEM #8: Discussion of possible sidewalk requirement amendments and updates
Action requested: Discussion & direction
ITEM #9: Discussion of Prevention of Demolition by Neglect ordinance and potential
amendments
Action requested: Discussion
ITEM #10: Discussion potential hearing dates for items continued from July
Action requested: Select 2 or 3 evenings when a quorum is available
ITEM #11: Update on staff activities
Riverwalk
Strategic Plan
Code Enforcelnent
ITEM #12: Adjourn
Please call the Planning Department if you cannot attend.
732-1270 extension 73 (this line is connected to voice mail)
101 East Orange Street • P.O. Box 429 • Hillsborough, North Carolina 2 72 78
919-732-1270 • Fax 919-644-2390
MINUTES
PLANNING BOARD
September 6, 2005
PRESENT: Matthew Farrelly (vice chair), Tom Campanella, Edna Ellis, Neil Jones, Paul Newton, Eric
Oliver, Dave Remington, Barrie Wallace
PUBLIC: Eddie Sain, Toby Vandemark, Tom Stevens, Bryant Warren, Keri Clay, Cheryl Johnston,
Mayor Joe Phelps, Bob Hornik, and Margaret Hauth
Farrelly called the meeting to order at 7:03 PM and confirmed the presence of a quorum.
ITEM #2: Remington moved to approve the minutes as written. Wallace seconded.
VOTE: Unanimous.
ITEM #3: Ellis asked to bring up some enforcement concerns, which were added during the code
enforcement update in item 11.
ITEM #4: Newton reported that the Board of Adjustment did not meet in August. Oliver reported that
the Parks and Recreation Board reviewed the Ashton Hall plan and asked for information
about an old road bed in the project and questioned the recreation points assigned to the
parking spaces at the recreation center. He said they received a request to consider tennis
courts when reviewing projects. The Board also approved a preliminary design for the
Hillsborough Heights Park and continues to work on park signs that address proper behaviors
and applicable rules. Remington reported that the Churton task force did not meet in August.
ITEM #5: Hauth introduced Vandemark, who is interested in filling the in town vacancy. She noted the
other applicant on file has decided to wait for a future position. Vandemark said her family
has been in the area since 1996 and they are currently renovating 110 S Churton Street to be a
residence upstairs and a restaurant run by their son downstairs. She said she also works as a
realtor and technology advisor to the Board of Pediatrics. She said the diversity of
Hillsborough attracts her. Oliver asked if she had sufficient time to attend meetings, hearings,
and committee assignments. Vandemark said she would have enough time. Ellis asked if she
would be able to visit sites of proposed development. Vandemark said yes, that is part of what
she enjoys in real estate.
MOTION: Oliver moved to recommend Vandemark's appointment. Campanella seconded.
VOTE: Unanimous.
ITEM #6: Hauth reminded the members of where they left off the discussion regarding regulating new
racks downtown. Oliver noted that the statistics he gathered earlier are out of date as the racks
seem to be mushrooming downtown. He noted his preference for the grassy area between the
public and leased parking lots behind Bank of America. He noted a concrete pad would be
needed to provide a method to secure the boxes and to limit their proliferation. He said this
choice would also require directional signage so people could find the racks. Campanella
supported the area near the alley parking lot by Dual Supply. He said that area has more
pedestrian activity in the morning and is more visible. Wallace agreed. Jones asked how the
town could require vendors to use racks the town provides. Hornik said they town regulate the
racks, but the regulation cannot be content based due to free speech concerns. Hauth said she
would do more research and report how Chapel Hill implemented the plan. The members
discussed various locations and positive and negative aspects of each including visibility,
vehicular access, existing activity, and size. The members asked Hauth to do further research
9/6/2005 Planning Board Minutes
Page 1
on three locations: the grassy area between the two parking lots, the area near Dual Supply,
and the first block of West King between the sidewalk and parking. She said she would also
report back on how the program is implemented in Chapel Hill and what costs we could expect
for purchasing the racks and maintaining them.
ITEM #7: Hauth introduced discussion of potential text amendments to both the Town Code and Zoning
Ordinance to update provisions dealing with noise. She noted that recent complaints around
construction noise and current business operations highlighted the difference between the
standards in the two documents. She noted the difficulty of having specific standards in the
Zoning Ordinance without having enforcement staff available at nights and on weekends,
when most complaints come in. She said the memo highlighted some changes that would
make the documents more consistent. Newton noted his support for changes that make
enforcement easier for the police department. Oliver expressed concern about moving away
from a specific standard. Hornik said that disturbance from noise is subjective and ordinances
vary widely. Oliver suggested getting input from the Police department before implementing
any changes. Campanella said that noise and light pollution are rapidly becoming quality of
life issues. The members agreed to discuss this more at the next meeting.
ITEM #8: Hauth introduced some options for amending the Zoning Ordinance regarding sidewalks. She
noted that specific zoning districts are listed in t he sections requiring sidewalks and the list is
not comprehensive. She asked the members if they wanted to see amendments to make
sidewalks universally required. The members agreed. She added that the Town Board is
researching using impact fess for sidewalks in limited circumstances. She said that the Town
Board will be researching those options later to allow developers in certain cases to pay an
impact fee rather than installing a required sidewalk. The members asked to be kept up to date
with the process.
ITEM #9: Hauth introduced the discussion of amending the Demolition by Neglect ordinance to address
some working confusion highlighted by the Colonial Inn case. She said a second part would
be to investigate whether the standards in the ordinance are what is desired and whether
additional standards for what types of repairs are acceptable should be added. Homik said that
the iterative process used the write the ordinance originally probably contributed to the
confusing language. Hauth suggested that a short term task force with 2 members of the
relevant boards work together and suggest amendments to the three boards. She suggested that
2 members of the HDC, PB, and Town Board could work together over a few short meetings.
The members agreed to pursue the task force. Newton indicated his willingness to serve.
ITEM #10: Hauth said the calendars in the packets showed available dates in October for the continued
public hearing. Members said they were generally available, with a preference for October 6.
She noted the special hearing and the regular October hearing would both be held in the
Orange County courthouse.
ITEM #11: Hauth updated the members on projects in the department: She said that the Requests for
Proposals for design on Riverwalk are due back on September 30. She added that the
appraisal work is almost complete and then the acquisition specialist will begin negotiating
with property owners. Hauth said that she is also working on an agreement with Orange
County to share expenses on the Strategic Growth Plan as well as Requests for Proposals for
consultants to complete the work. Hauth said work should begin on the plan with the
consultant in January. Hauth said that although the code enforcement position wasn't fully
funded for the year, she has hired an experience person through the holidays. She noted that
Thomas Cummings recently left Chapel Hill where he was dong the same job. She said he's
9/6/2005 Planning Board Minutes
Page 2
been on the job about 6 weeks and has approximately 100 cases underway. Ellis noted her
concern about the news article on Brent Lockwood. She noted that many of his statements
seem to indicate he is not following ordinance requirements. She also expressed concern
about the way in which construction is happening at Kenion Grove. She said that drainage
area on the south side on Revere is not well marked and could be very dangerous to anyone
walking along the road. Hauth said she would look into both situations and take the necessary
actions. Farrelly asked for an update on Turnip Patch Park. Hauth said the town is doing
some preliminary clean-up right now, but the construction hasn't begun yet. She added that the
final agreement with the citizens is not complete yet. Farrelly expressed concern about the
way in which the work was done. Hauth said she would look into it.
Farrelly adjourned the meeting at 8:55 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
M rgaret A. Hauth, Secretary
10114 p5
ate approved
9/6/2005 Planning Board Minutes
Page 3