Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2004_06_08_r92The Town of Leesburg, Virginia RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION: PRESENTED June 8, 2004 2 0 0 4- 9 2 ADOPTED June 8, 2004 APPROVING THE FISCAL YEARS 2005-2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2239 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes the preparation and annual review of a Capital Improvements Program (CIP); and WHEREAS, the town manager submitted a proposed Capital Improvements Program to the Town Council on March 23, 2004 and Planning Commission on April 15, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed CIP on April 15, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the CIP for compliance with the Town Plan and on May 6, 2004, approved the following motion to recommend the CIP for adoption by the Town Council: I move that the Planning Commission recommend that Town Council approve the Proposed 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program, containing 48 projects totaling $121,774,714, subject to CIP manager's addressing the comments contained in "Proposed 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program: Staff Comments," dated April 8, 2004, to the extent practicable when detailed plans for those projects are developed; and WHEREAS, the Town Council held a public heating on the budget including the Town Manager's proposed CIP on April 13, 2004; and WHEREAS, the CIP provides for the financing, acquisition and construction of capital facilities, projects and equipment in the amount of $121,849,714 over the next five years. THEREFORE, RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows: SECTION I. The Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 2005-2009 is approved and the -2- A RESOLUTION: APPROVING THE FISCAL YEARS 2005-2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS town staff is directed to address the comments contained in the "Proposed 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program: Staff Comments," dated April 8, 2004, to the extent practicable when detailed plans for those projects are developed. SECTION II. Prior year capital project funds and funds shown for FY 2005 totaling $45,315,864 are appropriated and shall remain in effect until such projects have been completed. PASSED this 8th day of June 2004. ATTEST: Cle~of Council ~- Attachments: CIP Summary 2005-2009 Sfftff Comments," dated April 8, 2004 ~. Um~stattd, Mayor (,, Town of Leesburg R:04 CIP20052009 PARKS & RECREATION SOUTH HARRISON ST. TRAIL 7 CATOCTIN CIRCLE TRAIL SOUTHWEST 8 SOUTH KING ST. TRAIL PHI 11 SOUTH KING ST. TRAIL PH II 12 IDA LEE SOCCER/LACROSSE FIELD No. 3 13 IDA LEE PARK TRAIL PH. II 14 OLDE IZAAK WALTON POND 15 OUTDOOR POOL (Design & Engineering ) 17 VETERANS PARK SITE DEVELOPMENT 18 BARN RENOVATIONS AT IDA LEE PARK 19 TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION STREETS & HIGHWAYS TRAFFIC SIGNAL EAST MKT./ED. FERRY RDS. 25 RT 15 WIDENING (SOUTH KING STREET) 28 DRY MILL RD. IMPROVEMENTS 32 BATTLEFIELD PKWY- SYCOLIN RD. TO RT. 7 35A BATTLEFIELD PKWY-EDWARDS FERRY TO FT EVANS 35B REALIGNMENT OF W. MARKET/LOUDOUN STS. 37 TRAF. SIGNAL-INTERSECTION IMPRO. CATOCTIN/ED. FERRY 38 TRAFFIC SIGNAL NORTH KING/NORTH ST. 39 WEST MARKET ST. SIDEWALK AND DRAINAGE 40 CHURCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS 41 CLUBHOUSE DRIVE SIDEWALK 42 EDWARDS FERRY AND BYPASS INTERCHANGE 43 EAST MARKET STREET SIDEWALK 44 LAWSON ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 45 EAST MARKET AND PLAZA ST. TURN LANE 46 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAST ARM REPLACEMENT 47 EDWARDS FERRY ROAD 48 TOTAL STREETS & HIGHWAYS STORM DRAINAGE WOODBERRY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 49 MISCELLANEOUS DRAINAGE STUDIES TURNER-HARWOOD DRAINAGE TOWN BRANCH IMPROVEMENTS KING ST. TOWN BRANCH IMPROVEMENTS MOSBY DR. TUSCARORA CREEK IMPROVEMENTS FT. EVANS ROAD SIDEWALK AND DRAINAGE IMP. GOVERNOR'S DRIVE ROUTE 15 EDWARDS FERRY./COLONIAL SQUARE COUNTRY CLUB STORM DRAINAGE LEESBURG COMMONS/PLAZA STREET TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE BUILDINGS, GROUNDS & EQUIPMENT SALT STORAGE DOME TOTAL BUILDINGS, GROUNDS & EQUIPMENT TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL GENERAL FUND PROJECTS 3-6, 10, 12, 15, 17- 20 $125,000 $30,000 $30,000 $23~ $4,825,000 $60,000 $4,329,659 $43O,OOO $115,000 $22,050 $176,400 $202,450 $310,000 $600,000 $66,150 $330,750 $396,900 $1,050,000 $1,080,000 $275,000 $305,000 $615,000 $615,000 $25,000 $445,000 $470,000 $200,000 $3,654,000 $3,904,000 $308,500 $308,500 $0 $923 200 $4,606,150 $8,191,850 $40,000 $9,799 50 51 $471,469 2 52 $145,000 16 53 $25,000 1 54 $5O,000 55 $270,000 8 56 9 57 7 60 $45,000 61 64 $1,074,000 $7,128,000 $50,341 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $50,000 $440,000 $25,000 $50,000 $220,000 $120,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $270,000 $2,135,000 $2,784,000 $10 000 $145,000 $145,000 $5,75O,OOO $929,864 $2O,OOO,OOO $500,000 $2,430,000 $370,000 $420,000 $440,000 $130,000 $155,000 $665,000 $270,000 $120,000 1,000,000 $2,500,000 $75,000 50,000 $50,000 $310,000 $120,000 $2,135,000 $1,345~341 $2,195,000 $36,514,864 $105,000 $365,000 $470,000 $548,531 $0 531 $365~000 $0 $200,000 SI,020,000 $795,000 $29O,OOO $895,OOO $1,525,000 $150,000 $1,400,000 $415,000 $30,000 $7,190~000 $0 ~iliiiiiiii~;~!iil $0 $0 $10,806,128 i$~t!~:' $2,784,000 $11,086,531 $11,045,128 il!/[~i~: $2~784,000 $12,010~031 $168,000 $0 $0 $168,000 $1,710,341 $2,195,000 $43,872,864 $3~348,541 $6,801,150 $52,064,714 UTILITY LINES WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, PH 13 - SYCOLIN RD UTILITY LINES MAINTENANCE BLDG. TOTAL UTILITY LINES WATER SUPPLY WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION TO 15 MGD WESTERN PRESSURE ZONE, SUB ZONE TOTAL WATER SUPPLY WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WPCF EXPANSION PROJECT BIOSOLIDS SPREADER TRUCK TOTAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL TOTAL UTILITY FUND PROJECTS AIRPORT FUND PROJECTS PERIMETER SECURITY FENCE LAND ACQUISITION SERVICES RUNWAY OVERLAY SOUTH APRON EXPANSION & SOUTH EXIT TOTAL AIRPORT FUND PROJECTS TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS ALL FUNDS 67 68 $430,000 62 7,650,000 84 $500,000 $500,o00 87 88 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $9,960,000 97 $570,000 101 $2,450,000 lO2 $14 ,ooo $1,480,000 $6,430,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,910,000 $4,500,000 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $25,220,000 $65O,00O $3,670,000 $3~670~000 $4,500,000 $5,000,000 $4~500,000 $25,870,000 $27,8OO,OO0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,950,000 $3,670,000 $4,500,000 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $61,730,000 $280,000 $1,200,000 $500,000 $500,000 $3,280,000 $3,100,000 $1,395,000 $1,200,000 $5001000 $500,000 $0 $8,055,000 $24,170,128iiii~~ $7,654,000 $17,010,031 $8,848,541 $11,301,150 $121,849,714 Proposed 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program Staff Comments 1. S. Harrison St Trail (P & R, #7) This project should be coordinated with the Town Branch Flood Control Improvements project (# 52). During design, the impacts of constructing a multi-purpose lane on the trees in park should be assessed; if the loss of trees is too great, bike lanes on Harrison Street, with accompanying sidewalks, should be considered as an alternative. 2. S. King St. Trail Phase I This project has been reviewed under the H-2 Corridor Ordinance. To facilitate the approval of future projects, design standards should be created for trails and sidewalks. 3. S. King St. Trail Phase II (P & R, # 12) Coordinate with Tuscarora Creek Drainage Improvements (# 54) to extend the length of the trail. Design should minimize loss of existing trees and should include a link to the S. Harrison St. Trail (# 7). Coordinate with and obtain proffers from proposed developments. 4. Ida Lee Soccer/Lacrosse Field #3 (P & R, # 13) No comment. 5. Ida Lee Park Trail Ph II (P & R, # 14) The project should include new openings in the fence along Old Waterford Road to link the trail with adjacent neighborhoods. 6. Olde Izaak Walton Pond (P & R, # 15) Coordinate with rezoning application for adjacent property (Waterside). 7. Outdoor Pool (P & R, # 17) No comment. 8. Veterans Park Site (P & R, # 18) No comment. 9. Barn Renovations (P & R, # 19) Preservation work should be consistent with the Ida Lee historic structures report and historic preservation standards. 10. Traffic Signal E. Mkt./Ed Ferr~ Rds (Streets, # 25) All elements of the project should be carefully designed to ensure compatibility with the district. This is one of several projects in the historic district; these and future projects would benefit from standards for improvements at intersections in the Historic District, covering such items as crosswalks, pedestrian signals, and signal posts. The Planning Department will take the lead in developing these standards. 11. Rt. 15 Widening (Streets, # 28) Exceptional care must be taken to ensure proper design. Bike lanes, multi-purpose trails, trees, and other design elements that would provide safe multi-modal transportation system, a gateway, traffic calming, and minimized impacts on adjacent properties. The Town should coordinate efforts with adjacent rezoning application (Meadowbrook). 12. Drymill Road Improvements (Streets, # 32) April 8, 2004 1 of 4 Design of this project must take into consideration minimizing the impact on the adjacent properties and trees while providing safe pedestrian and vehicular access. Consider drainage improvements only. Street widening would encourage higher speeds and result in longer pedestrian crossings at the Catoctin Circle intersection; construction of the sidewalk would require the loss of numerous trees, when pedestrians have reasonable alternatives-- the sidewalk on the eastern side of the street or the parallel W & OD trail. 13. Battlefield Pkwl;mS}'colin Rd to Rt 7 (Streets, # 35A) The scope should be expanded to include sidewalks, bikeways, landscaping, and the mitigation of impacts on W & OD and Tuscarora Creek. A bike/pedestrian connection to the W & OD is very important. The Planning Department will be actively involved in developing a scope of improvements for this project. 14. Battlefield Pkw},mEdwards Ferr~ to Ft Evans (Streets, # 35B) The scope should be expanded to include sidewalks, bikeways, and landscaping. The Planning Department will be actively involved in developing a scope of improvements for this project. 15. Realignment of W Market/Loudoun Sts (Streets, # 37) Accommodate O&HD standards for historic character. The project scope should be expanded to address pedestrian accommodations such as sidewalks and crossings. Consider other alternatives to a traffic signal, such as a traffic circle, which would provide better traffic flow at this multi-leg intersection while providing a landscaped gateway. 16. Traffic Signal Catoctin/Ed Ferr~ (Streets, # 38) The need for a left-tm lane should be balanced against the negative impacts of the project--on the character of the neighborhood (determined eligible for historic status) and a longer pedestrian crossing of Edwards Ferry Road. If built, the project should include appropriate crosswalks and pedestrian signalization, which were not mentioned in the project description. 17. Traffic Signal N King/North St (Streets, # 39) Accommodate historic district standards, including scale and traditional character of the neighborhood. This is one of several projects in the historic district that, along with future projects, would benefit fi.om standards for improvements in the historic district. 18. W Market St Sidewalk and Drainage (Streets, # 40) This project is the western entrance into the town and is in an H2 overlay district, with significant landscaping on both sides of the street and historic properties on the northern side of the street. Prior to design, an initial sketch should be submitted to the BAR to verify that scope of work considers the character of the streetscape, existing landscaping, road width, and connectivity of pedestrian circulation. 19. Church St Improvements (Streets, # 41) The scope of the project should be extended an additional block to provide a continuous sidewalk from Loudoun St. If the right-of-way allows, sidewalks should be installed on both sides of the street. 20. Clubhouse Dr Sidewalk (Streets, # 42) April 8, 2004 2 of 4 This project offers the potential to address several issues--narrowing a too-wide street, accommodating pedestrians, accommodating bicycles, and adding landscaping. Clubhouse Drive is excessively wide and could be narrowed to two 11-foot-wide automobile travel lanes by installing sidewalks (on both sides of the street, to allow for convenient routes northward toward Leesburg and southward toward the schools and the proposed Meadowbrook commercial area) and bicycle lanes within the existing curbs. This would allow for tree plantings rather than additional impervious surfaces outside of the curbs. The feasibility of these improvements and the cost implications will be further evaluated. 21. Edwards Ferry/B}'pass Interchange (Streets, # 43) The scope should be expanded to include bike lanes and nearby landscaping. Because interchanges are difficult for pedestrians and bicyclists, special care needs to be taken with the design of the intersections in this project. We should also consider artwork, special lighting, and other enhancements of the overpass. 22. E Market/Plaza St Turn Lane {Streets, # 46) Need for turn lane should be balanced against exposure created for pedestrians. Although the intersection meets warrants for a right-turn lane from Plaza onto Market Street, adding a turn lane will decrease the pedestrian friendly design desired for the H-2 corridor. Retain landscaping where it does not impede pedestrian safety and sight distance. 23. Traffic Signal Mast Arm Replacement (Streets, # 47) Signals should reflect the traditional character of the district. This is another project, along with others in the future, that would benefit from standards for traffic signals that are in scale and character with historic district. The Planning Department will be developing standards for various districts. 24. Edwards Ferry Road (Streets, # 48) The scope should be expanded to address sidewalks, bikeways, and landscaping. 25. Woodberry Rd Improvements (Storm Drainage, # 49) The scope should be expanded to include sidewalks, and landscaping. Low impact design standards should be considered. 26. Miscellaneous Drainage Studies (Storm Drainage, # 50-05) Low impact design should be considered. Possible issues of pedestrian/bike accommodation, landscaping, historic preservation should be evaluated as the scope of work for each study. 27. Turner-Harwood Drainage (Storm Drainage, # 51) Low impact design option should be considered. The scope does not mention landscaping, including retaining existing vegetation, and other opportunities to enhance the W & OD and adjacent properties. Ensure bike/pedestrian-link from old Sycolin Road to W & OD. 28. Town Branch Improvements, King St (Storm Drainage, # 52) Low impact design should be considered. Under review to verify landscaping & other opportunities to enhance the W & OD and adjacent properties & stream restoration. 29. Town Branch Improvements, Mosb}, Dr (Storm Drainage, # 53) Improvements must be consistent with character of National Register of Historic Places and locally designated historic property. Low impact design must be considered; project must also be sensitive to existing mature tree cover, if practical. 30. Tuscarora Creek Improvements (Storm Drainage, # 54) April 8, 2004 3 of 4 Low impact design to be compatible with adjacent residential uses and park. Landscaping & other opportunities to enhance adjacent properties & restore channel; bike/pedestrian-link to W & OD, as proposed in the town's Open Space, Trails, and Greenways master plan should be considered. 31. Ft Evans Rd Sidewalk and Drainage Improvements (Storm Drainage, # 55) The Planning Department will identify pedestrian circulation and specifications for width, etc., and study the feasibility of adding bike lanes and landscaping to scope of project. 32. Governor's Dr/Rt 15 (Storm Drainage, # 56-05) No comment. 33. Edwards Ferry/Colonial Sq (Storm Drainage, # 57) Concerned about the potential loss of trees along the property line of the Colonial Square Office condominiums and the need for replacement. 34. Countr~ Club Storm Drainage (Storm Drainage, # 60) Currently under review. Realignment of the storm drainage has been presented for consideration to minimize impact on existing mature trees. 35. Leesburg Commons/Plaza St (Storm Drainage, # 61) Landscaping and sidewalks should be included within the scope of this project. 36. Salt Storage Dome (Buildings, Grounds & Equipment, # 64) No comment. 37. Water S},stem Improvements, PH 13--S~'colin Rd (Utility Lines, # 67) No comment. 38. Utility Lines Maintenance Bldg (Utility Lines, # 68) Special exception application currently under review 39. Water Treatment Plant Expansion (Water Suppl}~, # 82) No comment 40. Western Pressure Zone, Subzone (Water Supply, # 84) Currently under review. 41. WPCF Expansion Project (Water Pollution Control, # 87) No comment. 42. Biosolids Spreader Truck (Water Pollution Control, # 88) No comment. 43. Perimeter Security Fence (Airport, # 91) No comment. 44. Land Acquisition Services (Airport, # 97) No comment. 45. Runway Overla~' (Airport, # 101) No comment. 46. South Apron Expansion & South Exit (Airport, # 102) No comment. J:XPlanning, Zoning & Development\CIP\CIP Ad-Hoc Committee Report3.doc April 8, 2004 4 of 4