HomeMy Public PortalAboutPKT-CC-2009-03-10CITY OF MOAB
MARCH 10, 2nna
PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP
6:30 PM
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
(217 East Center Street)
U
March
)00V111010NtillitSellidlir
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2
4:00 GM
6:00 GCAB
3
4
7:00 CVPC
5
6:00 MCPC
6
7
8
9
12:30 GCCOA
10
12:00 TRAIL
3:00 MVFPOC
5:00 GCCMD
6:30 TSSFD
7:00 MC Council
MIX
Meeting
11
6:00 GCPC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
5:00 GCLB
6:30 CVTC
7:00 GCRSSD
19
5:30 TCAB
20
21
22
23
12:00 CJC
24
3:00 MTPSC
5:00 SEUDND
7:00 MC Council Meeting
25
6:00 GCPC
26
6:00 MCPC
27
28
29
30
31
c.,,,,y0p.
2009
... 1„ rinnn \A I r•, rt 1 9 Arr•
Entry
Full Description
Meeting location
Dates
CHCSSD
Canyonlands Health Care Special Service District
Grand Center #4
Last Thursday
CVFP
Castle Valley Fire Protection
Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive
2nd Thursday
CVPC
Castle Valley Planning Commission
Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive
1st Wednesday
CVTC
Castle Valley Town Council
Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive
3rd Wednesday
GCCMD
Grand County Cemetary Maintenance District
Sunset Memorial Cemetary
2nd Tuesday
GC Council Meeting
Grand County Council Meeting
125 East Center Street
1st & 3rd Tuesday
GCAB
Grand County Airport Board
125 East Center Street
2nd Tuesday
GCCOA
Grand County Council on Aging
Grand Center
2nd Monday
GCHEC
Grand County Higher Education Committee
USU Extension Office
4th Thursday
GCHPC
Grand County Historic Preservation Committee
Grand Center
4th Wednesday
GCLB
Grand County Library Board
257 East Center Street
2nd Wednesday
GCPC
Grand County Planning Commission
125 East Center Street
2nd & 4th Wednesday
GCRSSD
Grand County Recreation Special Service District
217 East Center Street
2nd Wednesday
GCSDBE
Grand County School District Board of Education
264 South 400 East
3rd Wednesday
GCSWSSD
Grand County Solid Waste Special Service District
100 Sand Flats Road
1st Thursday
GCWB
Grand County Weed Board
Grand Center
1st Monday
GWSSA
Grand Water & Sewer Service Agency
3025 East Spanish Trail Road
1st & 3rd Thursday
LPC
Legislative Policy Committee
Utah Local Governments Trust No. SLC
3rd Monday
MARC
Moab Arts and Recreation Center Advisory Board
111 E. 100 North
1st Thursday
MATCAB
Moab Area Travel Council Advisory Board
125 East Center Street
4th Thursday
MC Council Meeting
Moab City Council Meeting
217 East Center Street
2nd & 4th Tuesday
MCPC
Moab City Planning Commission
217 East Center Street
2nd & 4th Thursday
MMAD
Moab Mosquito Abatement Distrcit
1000 East Sand Flats Road
1st or 2nd Thursday
SEUALG
South Eastern Utah Association of Local Government
Price
2nd Thursday
SEUDHD
South Eastern Utah District Health Department
Green River City Offices
TRAIL MIX
Trail Mix
Grand Center
2nd Tuesday noon
TSSD
Thompson Special Service District
Thompson Springs Fire Station
2nd Tuesday
TSSFD
Thompson Special Service Fire District
Thompson Springs Fire Station
2nd Thursday
April
I
Sun
Mon
Tue
2,009-Roab-ReetintScheduk—
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
1
7:00 CVPC
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
6:00 GCAB
4:30 GCHPC
6:00 MCPC
4:00 GCWB
6:00 GCPC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
12:30 GCCOA
12:00 TRAIL MIX
6:30 CVTC
5:30 TCAB
3:00 MVFPOC
7:00 GCLB
5:00 GCCMD
7:00 GCRSSD
7:00 MC Council Meeting
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
6:00 GCPC
6:00 MCPC
26
27
28
29
30
3:00 MTPSC
7:00 MC Council Meeting
2009
Updated on: 3/6/2009
Moab City Recorder's Office
Entry
Full Description
Meeting location
Dates
CHCSSD
Canyonlands Health Care Special Service District
Grand Center #4
Last Thursday
CVFP
Castle Valley Fire Protection
Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive
2nd Thursday
CVPC
Castle Valley Planning Commission
Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive
1st Wednesday
CVTC
Castle Valley Town Council
Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive
3rd Wednesday
GCCMD
Grand County Cemetary Maintenance District
Sunset Memorial Cemetary
2nd Tuesday
GC Council Meeting
Grand County Council Meeting
125 East Center Street
1st & 3rd Tuesday
GCAB
Grand County Airport Board
125 East Center Street
2nd Tuesday
GCCOA
Grand County Council on Aging
Grand Center
2nd Monday
GCHEC
Grand County Higher Education Committee
USU Extension Office
4th Thursday
GCHPC
Grand County Historic Preservation Committee
Grand Center
4th Wednesday
GCLB
Grand County Library Board
257 East Center Street
2nd Wednesday
GCPC
Grand County Planning Commission
125 East Center Street
2nd & 4th Wednesday
GCRSSD
Grand County Recreation Special Service District
217 East Center Street
2nd Wednesday
GCSDBE
Grand County School District Board of Education
264 South 400 East
3rd Wednesday
GCSWSSD
Grand County Solid Waste Special Service District
100 Sand Flats Road
1st Thursday
GCWB
Grand County Weed Board
Grand Center
1st Monday
GWSSA
Grand Water & Sewer Service Agency
3025 East Spanish Trail Road
1st & 3rd Thursday
LPC
Legislative Policy Committee
Utah Local Governments Trust No. SLC
3rd Monday
MARC
Moab Arts and Recreation Center Advisory Board
111 E. 100 North
1st Thursday
MATCAB
Moab Area Travel Council Advisory Board
125 East Center Street
4th Thursday
MC Council Meeting
Moab City Council Meeting
217 East Center Street
2nd & 4th Tuesday
MCPC
Moab City Planning Commission
217 East Center Street
2nd & 4th Thursday
MMAD
Moab Mosquito Abatement Distrcit
1000 East Sand Flats Road
1st or 2nd Thursday
SEUALG
South Eastern Utah Association of Local Government
Price
2nd Thursday
SEUDHD
South Eastern Utah District Health Department
Green River City Offices
TRAIL MIX
Trail Mix
Grand Center
2nd Tuesday noon
TSSD
Thompson Special Service District
Thompson Springs Fire Station
2nd Tuesday
TSSFD
Thompson Special Service Fire District
Thompson Springs Fire Station
2nd Thursday
City of Moab
217 East Center Street
Moab, Utah 84532
Main Number (435) 259-5121
Fax Number (435) 259-4135
www.moabcity.org
City of Moab — Regular Council Meeting
City Council Chambers: 217 East Center Street
Tuesday, March 10, 2009 at 7:00 p.m.
41111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
6:30 p.m. PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP
7:00 p.m.
SECTION 1:
Call to Order: Pledge to Flag:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1-1 February 4 and 5, 2009
1-2 February 10, 2009
1-3 February 24, 2009
1-4 March 5, 2009
SECTION 2: CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
SECTION 3: DEPARTMENTAL UPDATES
3-1 Community Development Department
3-2 Engineering Department
3-3 Planning Department
3-4 Police Department
3-5 Public Works Department
SECTION 4: PRESENTATION
4-1 Presentation of the Mayor's Student Citizenship of the
Month Award for February for Helen M. Knight
Intermediate School
SECTION 5: PUBLIC HEARINGS (Approximately 7:30 PM)
5-1 Proposed Ordinance #2009-04 - An Ordinance Annexing
Property to the City of Moab
5-2 Proposed 2009 Community Development Block Grant
Project to Improve the Virginian Apartments
SECTION 6: NEW BUSINESS
6-1 Approval of Local Consent for Issuance of a State of
Utah Private Club Liquor License to Edward
Snyder, d.b.a. Eddie McStiff's Inc. Located at 57
South Main Street
6-2 Approval of a Private Club License for Edward
Snyder, d.b.a. Eddie McStiff's Inc. Located at 57
South Main Street
6-3 Approval of Local Consent for Issuance of a State of
Utah Private Club Liquor License to Michael Miller,
d.b.a. Moab Brewers LLC Located at 686 South
Main Street
6-4 Approval of a Private Club License for Michael
Miller, d.b.a. Moab Brewers LLC Located at 686
South Main Street
6-5 Request for Use of Old City Park by Western Stars
Riders on June 17, 2009
6-6 Request by John Knowles for Use of City Right-of-
way to Conduct a Sidewalk Sale on March 21 to 22,
2009
6-7 Approval of a Moved -on Structure Permit for
Shannon Clarke, d.b.a. Millenium Shades
Sunglasses Located at 391 South Main Street to
Conduct a Temporary Mobile Sales Structure for
Sunglasses Sales from April 2 to April 27, 2009
6-8 Approval of a Moved -on Structure Permit for Brian
Merrill, d.b.a. Moab Adventure Center Located at
225 South Main Street to Conduct a Parking Lot
Sale from March 20 to September 20, 2009
6-9 Approval of Proposed Resolution #06-2009 - A
Resolution Encouraging the Utah State Legislature
to Utilize the Current Transportation Funding
Distribution Formula for any Increase to the
Statewide Gas Tax so that the Entire
Transportation Network May Benefit
6-10 Approval of Ordinance #2009-01 - An Ordinance to
Amend Title 17.00, Zoning, with the Addition of a
New Chapter 17.52, Keeping Limited Numbers of
Fowl, Specifically Hen Chickens for Eggs and
Establishing Maintenance Standards
6-11 Approval of the City of Moab Flexible Benefits Plan
Election Form/Contract and Compensation
Reduction Agreement
6-12 Approval of a Boundary Line Adjustment for Drake
Taylor for Property Located at 498 Rosetree Lane
6-13 Approval of Proposed Resolution #06-2009 - A
Resolution Ratifying All Action On Authorizing Not
More Than $4,900,000 Of Taxable Sales Tax
Revenue Bonds To Finance Recreational
Improvements
6-14 Approval of Proposed Resolution #07-2009 - A
Resolution Approving the Form of the Equipment
Lease Agreement with Zions First National Bank,
Salt Lake City, Utah. Finding that it is in the Best
Interests of the City of Moab, Utah to Enter Into
Said Agreement, and Authorizing the Execution and
Delivery Thereof
SECTION 7: READING OF CORRESPONDENCE
SECTION 8: ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
SECTION 9: REPORT ON CITY/ COUNTY COOPERATION
SECTION 10: MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
SECTION 11: PAY THE BILLS AGAINST THE CITY OF MOAB
SECTION 12: ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this
meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532;
or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting.
Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org
MOAB CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
February 4 and 5, 2009
The Moab City Council held a Special Meeting on the above date at the
Council Chambers of Moab City Offices, located at 217 East Center
Street, Moab, Utah. Mayor David L. Sakrison called the Special Meeting
to order at 9:00 AM. In attendance were Councilmembers Sarah Bauman,
Rob Sweeten, Kyle Bailey, Jeffrey Davis and Gregg Stucki. Also in
attendance were City Manager Donna Metzler, City Recorder Rachel
Ellison, City Treasurer Jennie Ross, City Engineer Dan Stenta, Planning
Director Jeff Reinhart, Zoning Administrator Sommar Johnson, Public
Works Director Brent Williams, Water Superintendent Lloyd Swenson,
Street Superintendent Ken Denney, Facilities Supervisor Chace Gholson,
Parks Superintendent Mark Marshall, Administrative Analyst/Economic
Development Coordinator Kenneth F. Davey, City Treasurer Jennie
Ross, Recreation Coordinator John Geiger, Recreation Assistant Justin
Marcus, Moab Arts and Recreation Center Administrator Bayley Rogers,
Swim Center Manager Dan Tally, Planning and Community
Development Director David Olsen, Film Commission Director Tara
Campbell, Police Chief Michael Navarre, Police Lieutenant Scott
Mallon, Police Officer III Craig Shumway and Animal Control Officer
Randy Zimmerman. In attendance from the Moab City Planning
Commission were members Jeanette Kopell, Kelly Thornton, Kara
Dohrenwend, Wayne Hokisson and Joe Downard.
The purpose of the Special Meeting was a Visioning Workshop between
Elected Officials and City Departments.
SPECIAL MEETING & ATTENDANCE
PURPOSE OF SPECIAL MEETING
City Manager Metzler made a brief presentation. Each Department made DISCUSSION REGARDING VISIONING
a presentation. Discussion followed amongst City Staff and City
Councilmembers.
A discussion with the Moab City Planning Commission occurred at 1:15 DlscusslON WITH PLANNING
PM COMMISSION
Mayor Sakrison recessed the Special Meeting at 3:30 PM. MEETING RECESSED
Mayor Sakrison reconvened the Special Meeting on February 5, 2009 at
9:00 AM.
Discussion and presentations continued.
Mayor Sakrison adjourned the Special Meeting at 11:32 AM.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Rob Sweeten
Mayor Pro-Tem
Rachel Ellison
City Recorder
MEETING RECONVENED
DISCUSSION CONTINUED
ADJOURNMENT
February 4 and 5, 2009 Page 1 of 1
MOAB CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
February 10, 2009
The Moab City Council held its Regular Meeting on the above date in
the Council Chambers of Moab City Offices, located at 217 East Center
Street, Moab, Utah. Mayor David L. Sakrison called the Pre -Council
Workshop to order at 6:30 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers
Jeffrey Davis, Gregg Stucki, Kyle Bailey, Sarah Bauman and Rob
Sweeten; City Manager Donna Metzler, City Recorder/Assistant City
Manager Rachel Ellison, City Engineer Dan Stenta, Community
Development Director David Olsen, City Treasurer Jennie Ross,
Planning Director Jeff Reinhart and Police Chief Mike Navarre.
Mayor Sakrison called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at
7:00 PM and Citizen B.D. Howard led in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Eight (8) members of the audience and media were present.
Councilmember Sweeten moved to approve the Regular Council
Meeting Minutes of January 27, 2009. Councilmember Bailey seconded
the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye.
There were no Citizens to be Heard.
A Community Development Department Update was not given.
Under Engineering Department Update, City Engineer Stenta stated that
the Colorado River Bridge Project had been awarded and would start
around March 1, 2009.
Under Planning Department Update, Planning Director Reinhart stated
that there would be a public hearing that Thursday on the Secret Cove
Subdivision as well as a public hearing on the proposed fowl ordinance.
Planning Director Reinhart stated that staff was reviewing the proposed
zoning map.
A Police Department Update was not given.
A Public Works Department Update was not given.
Councilmember Sweeten moved to approve the Confirmation of
a Mayoral Appointment to the Moab Mosquito Abatement
District of Mark Marshall for a four year term ending December
31, 2012. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The
motion carried 5-0 aye.
Councilmember Bailey moved to approve a Request to Send
Proposed Ordinance #2009-04 — An Ordinance Annexing
Property to the City of Moab to Public Hearing. Councilmember
Sweeten seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye.
Councilmember Bailey moved to approve a Professional
Services Agreement by and between Bowen Collins &
Associates and the City of Moab. Councilmember Stucki
seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 by a roll -call -vote.
Councilmember Sweeten moved to approve an Imagery
Agreement by and between the State of Utah Department of
Technology Services and the City of Moab. Councilmember
Stucki seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye by a
roll -call -vote.
REGULAR MEETING &
ATTENDANCE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
ENGINEERING UPDATE
PLANNING UPDATE
POLICE UPDATE
PUBLIC WORKS UPDATE
MAYOR APPOINTMENT TO
MMAD BOARD, APPROVED
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
#2009-04 SENT TO PUBLIC
HEARING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH
BOWEN COLLINS &
ASSOC., APPROVED
IMAGERY AGREEMENT
WITH STATE OF UTAH,
APPROVED
February 10, 2009
Page 1 of 2 1 _ 2
There was no Correspondence to be Read.
Under Administrative Report, City Manager Metzler stated that an
Aquatic Center walk-through had been conducted that day and that
proposals were due on February 20, 2009. City Manager Metzler stated
that the City Council would approve a contract for those services in
March. City Manager Metzler continued that she had been working on
the Rotary Park property purchase, and that there would be a Joint City
Council/Planning Commission meeting on February 24 at 6:00 PM.
A Report on City/County Cooperation was not given.
Under Mayor and Council Reports, Mayor Sakrison stated that Senator
Bennett would be in Moab on Thursday, February 19 for the Rural
Business Conference.
Councilmember Bailey moved to pay the bills against the City of Moab
in the amount of $81,678.75. Councilmember Sweeten seconded the
motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye by a roll -call -vote.
Mayor Sakrison adjourned the meeting at 7:12 PM.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David L. Sakrison Rachel Ellison
Mayor City Recorder
READING OF
CORRESPONDENCE
ADMINISTRATIVE
REPORTS
REPORT ON CITY/COUNTY
COOPERATION
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
REPORTS
APPROVAL OF BILLS
ADJOURNMENT
February 10, 2009
Page 2 of 2 1 -2
MOAB CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
February 24, 2009
The Moab City Council held its Regular Meeting on the above date in
the Council Chambers of Moab City Offices, located at 217 East Center
Street, Moab, Utah. Mayor David L. Sakrison called the Pre -Council
Workshop to order at 6:00 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers
Jeffrey Davis, Gregg Stucki, Kyle Bailey, Sarah Bauman and Rob
Sweeten; City Manager Donna Metzler, City Recorder/Assistant City
Manager Rachel Ellison, Planning Director Jeff Reinhart, Zoning
Administrator Sommar Johnson, Planning Commission Members
Wayne Hoskisson, Kara Dohrenwend, Kelly Thornton, Jeanette Kopell
and Joe Downard.
A Presentation was made by the Planning Commission. Discussion
followed.
Mayor Sakrison called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at
7:00 PM and Citizen B.D. Howard led in the Pledge of Allegiance. Also
in attendance was City Treasurer Jennie Ross. Sixteen (16) members of
the audience and media were present.
There were no minutes to approve.
There were no Citizens to be Heard.
A Community Development Department Update was not given.
An Engineering Department Update was not given.
Under Planning Department Update, Planning Director Reinhart stated
that staff was still in the process of reformatting sections of the
municipal code.
A Police Department Update was not given.
A Public Works Department Update was not given.
Presentations were canceled.
Councilmember Davis moved to approve a Local Consent for
Issuance of a State of Utah Private Club Liquor License to
Timothy Ward Buckingham, d.b.a. Buckingham Enterprises
Located at 1393 North Highway 191. Councilmember Bauman
seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye.
Councilmember Bailey moved to approve a Private Club
License for Timothy Ward Buckingham, d.b.a. Buckingham
Enterprises Located at 1393 North Highway 191.
Councilmember Bauman seconded the motion. The motion
carried 5-0 aye.
Councilmember Sweeten moved to approve a Special Event
License for the Skinny Tire Festival to Conduct a Road Cycling
Tour on March 13 to 16, 2009 Located at 1551 North Highway
191. Councilmember Bauman seconded the motion. The
motion carried 5-0 aye.
Councilmember Bailey moved to approve a Moved -on Structure
Permit for City Market #410, Located at 425 South Main Street
to Conduct a Seasonal Garden Center. Councilmember Stucki
seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye.
REGULAR MEETING &
ATTENDANCE
PRESENTATION BY
PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
ENGINEERING UPDATE
PLANNING UPDATE
POLICE UPDATE
PUBLIC WORKS UPDATE
PRESENTATIONS
CANCELED
LOCAL CONSENT FOR
PRIVATE CLUB FOR
BUCKINGHAM
ENTERPRISES, APPROVED
PRIVATE CLUB LICENSE
FOR BUCKINGHAM
ENTERPRISES, APPROVED
SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE
FOR SKINNY TIRE
FESTIVAL, APPROVED
MOVED -ON STRUCTURE
FOR CITY MARKET,
APPROVED
February 24, 2009
Page 1 of 3 1 - 3
Councilmember Davis moved to approve a Moved -on Structure
Permit for Joe Downard, d.b.a. PaPa Joe's Jerky Roundup to
Conduct a Jerky Stand Located at 83 South Main Street from
March 20 to October 20, 2009. Councilmember Stucki seconded
the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye.
Councilmember Davis moved to approve a Local Vendor
License for Joe Downard, d.b.a. PaPa Joe's Jerky Roundup to
Conduct a Jerky Stand Located at 83 South Main Street.
Councilmember Sweeten seconded the motion. The motion
carried 5-0 aye.
Councilmember Sweeten moved to approve a Request to Send
the 2009 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project
to Public Hearing. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion.
The motion carried 5-0 aye.
Under Reading of Correspondence, Mayor Sakrison stated that Dean
Frasier from Utah State University would be in Moab on March 24 and
would like to meet with the Council as would the Utah Department of
Transportation on April 7, 2009 from 9:00 to 11:00 AM.
Under Administrative Report, City Manager Metzler stated that Request
for Proposals for the Aquatic Center had closed, that the City had
received a great response and a committee was in the process of
reviewing the proposals. City Manager Metzler then stated that she had
been working on a draft property agreement with the Rotary Club and
that city departments were working on their proposed budgets for the
next fiscal year.
Under Report on City/County Cooperation, City Manager Metzler stated
that she was contacting the County Council Chair to schedule the next
joint meeting.
Under Mayor and Council Reports, Councilmember Bailey stated that
the hospital project was progressing nicely and that representatives from
Housing and Urban Development would like to meet with city officials
on March 17, 2009.
Councilmember Sweeten stated that he had been contacted by a citizen
regarding maintenance of a dam on his property.
Mayor Sakrison stated that he had met with representatives from the
University of Utah regarding the Entrada Ranch project.
Mayor Sakrison opened a public hearing on 1) Receive Input from the
Public with Respect to the Issuance of not more than $4,900,000
Aggregate Principal Amount of Taxable Sales Tax Revenue Bonds for
the Purpose of (i) Financing a Portion of the Costs of the Acquisition
and Construction of Recreational Improvements, Including the
Construction of an Aquatic and Recreational Facility to be Owned by
the Issuer, and (ii) Paying Issuance Expenses, and the Potential
Economic Impact that the Improvement, Facility, or Property for which
the Bonds will pay all or part of the Cost will have on the Private
Sector; and 2) A Public Hearing on Proposed Resolution #04-2009 — A
Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2008/2009 Budget at 7:25 PM.
City Manager Metzler made a brief presentation.
Mayor Sakrison closed the public hearing at 7:34 PM.
Councilmember Sweeten moved to approve Proposed
MOVED -ON STRUCTURE
FOR PAPA JOE'S JERKY
ROUNDUP, APPROVED
LOCAL VENDOR'S
LICENSE FOR PAPA JOE'S
JERKY ROUNDUP,
APPROVED
REQUEST TO SEND 2009
CDBG 2009 PROJECT TO
PUBLIC HEARING,
APPROVED
READING OF
CORRESPONDENCE
ADMINISTRATIVE
REPORTS
REPORT ON CITY/COUNTY
COOPERATION
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
REPORTS
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
February 24, 2009
Page 2 of 3 1 3
Resolution #04-2009 — A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year
2008/2009 Budget. Councilmember Bailey seconded the
motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye by a roll -call -vote.
Councilmember Bailey moved to pay the bills against the City of Moab
in the amount of $218,326.22. Councilmember Sweeten seconded the
motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye by a roll -call -vote.
Mayor Sakrison adjourned the meeting at 7:32 PM.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David L. Sakrison
Mayor
Rachel Ellison
City Recorder
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
#04-2009, APPROVED
APPROVAL OF BILLS
ADJOURNMENT
1-3
February 24, 2009 Page 3 of 3
MOAB CITY COUNCIL
JOINT SPECIAL MEETING
March 5, 2009
The Moab City Council held a Special Meeting on the above date in the
Council Chambers of Moab City Offices, located at 217 East Center
Street, Moab, Utah. Mayor Pro-Tem Gregg Stucki called the Joint City
Council/Planning Commission Meeting to order at 6:06 PM.
Also in attendance were Councilmembers Kyle Bailey, Sarah Bauman
and Rob Sweeten; City Manager Donna Metzler, City
Recorder/Assistant City Manager Rachel Ellison, City Engineer Daniel
Stenta, Planning Director Jeff Reinhart and Zoning Administrator
Sommar Johnson. In attendance from the Moab City Planning
Commission were members Kara Dohrenwend, Kelly Thornton,
Jeanette Kopell, Wayne Hoskisson and Joe Downard. Four (4)
members of the audience were present.
The purpose of the Joint Special Meeting was Discussion Regarding
Proposed Ordinance #2009-02 — An Ordinance Amending Title 17.00 by
Establishing Infill Development Regulations for Residential Zones and
providing a Saving Clause; Providing a Severability Clause; and
Providing an Effective Date.
Moab Planning Commission Chair Kara Dohrenwend made a brief
presentation. Discussion followed amongst Planning Commission
Members and City Council Members.
Mayor Pro-Tem Stucki adjourned the Joint Special Meeting at 7:02 PM.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
David L. Sakrison
Mayor
Rachel Ellison
City Recorder
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
& ATTENDANCE
PURPOSE OF MEETING
PRESENTATION AND
DISCUSSION
ADJOURNMENT
January 29, 2008 Page 1 of 1
1-4
ORDINANCE 2009-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF MOAB
ANNEXING PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF MOAB
WHEREAS, THE Moab governing body has received a petition for annexation of
certain property as described in Exhibit "1" hereto; and
WHEREAS, the property has been proposed for urban development as defined by
Utah State Law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the property meets the
requirements of the City's annexation policy plan; and
WHEREAS, the landowners of the affected property have consented to and
petitioned for this annexation and the City Recorder has certified that the application
complies with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered comments from affected entities, if
any, and no notice of protest has been filed subsequent to the publication of notice of the
application, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the governing body has held the appropriate public hearings and
given the appropriate public notice and received public input.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the governing body of the City of Moab
City that:
The property described in Exhibit "1" and located at approximately 792 West 400
North is hereby annexed into the City of Moab and the zoning designation for said
annexation shall be zoned as R-4.
This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage and this ordinance
constitutes an amendment to the articles of incorporation for the City of Moab.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS _ DAY March OF, 2009.
David L. Sakrison
Mayor
ATTEST:
Rachel Ellison
City Recorder
Ordinance 2009-04 Page 1 of 1
City of Moab
Planning and Zoning Department
Correspondence
January 16, 2009
Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Call for Public Hearing of Ordinance No. 2009-04 an Ordinance
Annexing the Valley Vista Property to the City of Moab, as
Submitted by Scott McFarland and Referred to Council by the
Planning Commission
Background
Mr. Scott McFarland has applied for annexation of the .61-acre (26,572 square feet) tract
of land located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Riversands Road and 400
North. The property is addressed as 792 West 400 North, and is west and adjacent to
Riversands Road. Mr. McFarland, as the owner of record, has requested R-4 zoning to
allow multi -family development.
Discussion
The Planning Commission conducted a review of this application at their regular meeting
held on January 22, 2009, and evaluated the annexation petition for conformance to the
code. Chapter 1.32, attached, was used to determine compliance with the Annexation
Policy Plan and state regulations. The Planning Commission memo PL-09-008 is also
attached for review.
The applicant has stated that he would like to construct affordable housing on the
property and feels that the R-4 Zoning designation would allow him to provide six (6)
dwellings. Staff recommended that he establish that affordable housing can be
constructed on this property prior to a pre -annexation agreement being drafted. No plan
has yet been submitted.
The proposed annexation of Mr. McFarland's property is attached as Exhibit "A". Exhibit
"B" shows a more desirable annexation of the portion of 400 North that should be
included and is directly south of the McFarland property. Exhibit B also indicates a sliver
of property 33 feet in width dedicated to the county as one-half of a road right-of-way in a
previous action for the development of property that is now owned by Mr. David
Bonderman's. The piece is adjacent to Apple Lane but not a part of the right-of-way. This
piece, with Mr. McFarland's property, the portion of 400 North as well as an additional
piece adjacent to the north boundary of 400 North is included in this annexation. The
configuration of this annexation will correct an awkward situation and alleviate an
unusual peninsula of city property.
()
z`
Recommendation
The Planning Commission has favorably referred the application back to Council so that
a time and date for public hearing can be established. The Planning Commission also
recommends that:
1. The requested R-4 zoning will be applied to the property.
2. The additional access parcel adjacent to and extending north of the Apple
Drive right-of-way be included as well as the other adjacent property
along 400 North,
3. The surrounding adjacent zoning is to be applied to these areas.
P:\2009\Correspondence\P1-09-014 McFarland annex to CC.doc
\k1
AN/NOUN 1110
N33NNN3 uD
N30N00311 A110
NOAVN
0.7 dl✓.2 96'ON.C6 OW/01/4 fd6"
'SC N3LL ELN310100 35
ONNNC30-d0-1N0)d
SONINV30 d0 SISVO
7�
.001611 4.00l5e5 s
3N1 NO 03Np3d5 SV 03/N3111NpN 3W 1stl13N1103 'VSSS31
1NIDNO3MON 'ISOIN/ 3 1NNN
03 ONV ON030 d0
of '1 1s'Otl N0
•xi00 S 30N)y 'N3.0100
V
'ld V 01 3.03,15.00 N 30N VINOD V 01
S 3M1 I 4.000000 N iJININ 14 00'61l 0.00.1SA0
1/033 ONS N101 33KM/ ONN 3XKOld ONV 3r15
'3 li N 'S St 1 5C NONO3S A NNN(K) 35 3111 NOW '13 005611 31.00,15.60 S SIM30 1NI13d ONS 5C 113I1335
1O 3NII KOOS 31/1 NO 1N10d V 1V SN0114030
:50MON 'NV111 AiiinoIOJ NNW 710.4 SV ��et.33 [y y iL[
N011035 f/135 3N/ 16 awl 10 T30NVd V so NOMARDS10
NOL1627NN6' S/f,/.L
NOI.Ldl3S7S24 71'027
L 00I-Nor I
(100dq)
alV▪ 3▪ S 3IHdVHD w
/i%!i%I%/,!ii.'Y,'. C %G///..iSss!aiY✓, i r, �y ,:
.00.1S.60N
SlAW7
b
8
xVin `ALLu1100 auVZID gVoW
cIVW NOLLVXHuuV
.V1p
1,.
1.RSIVIS' ILDIC 1 00i
000L Y N30N3030
LC510 'Nvlll 'BVON 133N/S N31N30 1SV3 S/
DA0:44212/22,5' ONYT JY90.1rA/
AO 03NVd3Nd
wom
senunwns uN! 0:1 dI nim
NIS '3 IZ IC5 SL 1,
'sC NON035 N30N00 1/1 NLIIOs
0.301110S30 SV 1N3NNNON
ON00! 'dv0 Just,. N1111 NV03N .0/S
ON99A7
d671' d.LlNl.7G1
sepepunog 18aMd
SPilin 40
pue6a,
uNexeuuy pesodoad jo kijup!A - 6uiuoz 6uRspg &wogs den
City of Moab
217 East Center Street
Moab, Utah 84532
Main Number (435) 259-5121
Fax Number (435) 2594135
PAYMENT RECEIVED
CITY OF MOAB
NOV 17 2008
CH # (o .f ley 3)A
AMOUNT 1 a 0
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
Petition date: /1)00. / ? _lGve
Petition Description (Approximate Address): 79c2 6j• 4/C04)
Contact Sponsor Name: ifi4ay asl74
Contact Sponsor Mailing Address: 776" Air u�/D- Da.. 41p,423, (//t
Contact Sponsor Phone Number: 41.3,5""- o/08
We, the undersigned, being a majority of the owners of real property in territory lying contiguous
to the corporate limits of Moab City, a municipal corporation in Grand County, State -of Utah, and
being also the owners of more than one-third (1/3) in value of the property in said territory as
shown by the last assessment rolls in Grand County, hereby respectfully petition the Honorable
Mayor and City Council of Moab City that such territory be annexed to and become part of said
Moab City and that the corporate city limits of Moab City be extended so as to include the
territory herein below listed.
My signature on this petition may be considered as a separate petition or as part of a multiple -
petitioner petition.
Printed Name Mailing Address
Signature
�O77/1%Rti4,10 ?7.rh`l(toa-Aga, a -
2. _
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
* Moab City Code 17.12.150 Moab City —Annexation Petition
ti
RECEIVED
MAY 14 2007
Utah Div. Of Cod $ Comm. Code
ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION
OF
VALLEY VISTA, LLC
The undersigned, acting as Manager of this Utah limited liabili co ty mpany (the
"Company") under the Utah Revised Limited Liability Company Act (the "Act"), adopts the
following Articles of Organization for the Company:
•
1. The name of the Company is Valley Vista, LLC.
2. The latest date upon which the Company is to be dissolved is January 1, 2106.
3. The principal business purpose for which the Company is formed is to transact
any and all lawful business for which limited liability companies may be organized under the
Act.
4. The street address of the Company's registered office and the name and street
address of the registered agent and the designated office where the records required by Section
48 2c-112 of the Act shall be maintained are as follows:
Scott Alan McFarland
775 Hillside Drive
Moab, Utah 84532
I hereby consent to be named as the registered agent of the Company.
,/S otE Alan McFarland
5. The Company appoints the director of the Division of Corporations and
Commercial Code of the Utah Department of Commence as agent for service ofprocess of the
Company if the appointed registered agent has resigned, the registered agent's authority has been
revoked, or if the agent cannot be found or served with the exercise of reasonable diligence.:
2008512.
Date: 05//412007
Receipt Number:2125774
AMOUni Paid: 552.00
6_ The business and affairs of the Company shall be managed by a Manager. The
mane and address of the Manager of the Company is as follows:
Scott Alan McFarland
775 Hillside Drive
Moab, Utah 84532
7. The effective date of the Company will be the date the Articles of Organization
have been filed with the Division of Corporations and Commercial Code of the Utah Department
of Commerce
-2-
2ooss 12.1
tt Alan McFarland, Manage/
CERTIFICATION
I, Rachel Ellison, the duly appointed City Recorder, in and for the City of
Moab, Grand County, State of Utah, do hereby certify that attached Petition by
Scott McFarland/Valley Vista. LLC, meets the annexation requirements outlined in
Title 10-2-403(2) (3) and (4) of the Utah Code Annotated, specifically:
1) That said petition contains the signatures of all of the property
owners of record of the private real property that:
a) is located within the area proposed for annexation;
b) covers a majority of the private land area within the area
proposed for annexation;
c) is equal in value to at least 1/3 of the value of all private
real property within the area proposed for annexation;
2) That said petition was accompanied by an accurate and recordable
plat or map prepared by a licensed surveyor of the area proposed
for annexation;
3) That said petition was accompanied by a copy of the notice sent to
affected entities and a list of the affected entities to which notice
was sent;
4) That no previous petition for annexation has been filed which has
not been denied, rejected, or granted for the proposed annexation
area;
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the official seal of the
City of Moab, this 9th day of January, 2009.
Rachel Ellison
City Recorder
PL-0B-00B
City of Moab
Planning and Zoning Department
Correspondence
January 16, 2009
Memo To: Members of the Moab Planning Commission
From: Planning Staff
Subject: Review of an Application to Annex into the City of Moab a .61-Acre
Tract of Land Located on the Northwest Corner of the Intersection
of Riversands Road and 400 North, as Submitted by Scott
McFarland
Background
Mr. Scott McFarland has applied for annexation of the .61-acre (26,572 square feet) tract
located at 792 West 400 North, west and adjacent to Riversands Road. Mr. McFarland,
as the owner of record, has requested R-4 zoning to allow multi -family development.
Discussion
Code section 1.32.020, Annexation procedure, contains a very specific process that
must be followed.
First, the city recorder, upon receiving a petition for annexation, submits the petition to
the Council, which must accept the petition for further consideration or reject the petition
within fourteen days. Since the petition was accepted by Council on December 9, 2008 it
goes on for further review by the City Recorder for completeness and compliance with
state law.
The Recorder has thirty days from acceptance by Council to review and certify to
Council that the petition is in accordance with the law. Within ten (10) days of notice of
certification by Council, notification of the proposed annexation must be published in a
newspaper of general circulation for three consecutive weeks and notice sent to all
affected entities.
Upon certification by the City Recorder, the petition may be submitted to the Planning
Commission for analysis and review against the annexation policy plan and for
recommendations with respect to the appropriate zoning. This application is in this stage
of the annexation application process (please refer to the attached flow chart).
Review with Policy Plan
Planning Commission
P1-09-008
Valley Vista Annexation
January 02, 2009
The Annexation Policy Plan is contained in Code Chapter 1.32.030, and contains the
following policy declaration.
1. Sound urban development is essential to the continued economic
development of this state;
2. Municipalities are created to provide urban governmental services essential for
sound urban development and for the protection of public health, safety and
welfare in residential, commercial and industrial areas, and in areas undergoing
development;
3. Municipal boundaries should be extended, in accordance with specific
standards, to include areas where a high quality of urban governmental services
is needed and can be provided for the protection of public health, safety and
welfare and to avoid the inequities of double taxation and the proliferation of
special service districts;
4. Areas annexed to municipalities in accordance with appropriate standards
should receive the services provided by the annexing municipality as soon as
possible following the annexation;
5. Areas annexed to municipalities should include all of the urbanized
unincorporated areas contiguous to municipalities, securing to residents within
the areas a voice in the selection of their government;
6. Decisions with respect to municipal boundaries and urban development need
to be made with adequate consideration of the effect of the proposed actions on
adjacent areas and on the interests of other government entities, on the need for
and cost of local government services, and the ability to deliver the services
under the proposed actions and on factors related to population growth and
density and the geography of the area.
Section B of the next portion of this chapter describes the geographic areas considered
most favorable for future city expansion and contains the Annexation Policy Plan Map.
The attached map and legal description were adopted by Council, with a favorable
recommendation from the Planning Commission, on August 26, 2008. The Map
indicates the anticipated future extent of the city of Moab's boundaries and areas that
are more readily available for service.
Criteria for Annexations
Criteria as required by state law, together with additional criteria and policies for city
acceptance of an annexation are located in section C as follows:
a. The property must be contiguous to the boundaries of the city.
b. The property must lie within the area projected for the city municipal
expansion.
c. The property must not be included within the boundaries of another
Planning Commission
PL-09-008
Valley Vista Annexation
January 02, 2009
incorporated municipality.
d. The annexation must not create unincorporated islands within the boundaries
of the city.
e. The property proposed to be annexed hereunder will not be annexed for the
sole purpose of acquiring municipal revenue or for retarding the capacity of any
other municipality to annex into the same or related area.
Evaluation of Annexations
2. The city must also evaluate the following for each annexation:
a. Compliance with all requirements of appropriate state code provisions.
This is a function of the City Recorder and the Recorder has determined that the
application satisfies the law.
b. The current and potential population of the area, and the current residential
densities.
The current population of the tract is zero because it is undeveloped. Under
current county zoning of LLR, Large Lot Residential, the .61-acre tract is allowed
to develop with two dwellings per acre in a conventional subdivision. However,
the existing lot size would restrict this tract to a single dwelling. It is anticipated
that the population would follow the 2000 census information in that the average
household size for the county is 2.44 persons and the average family size is 3.06
persons.
It is expected that the number of dwellings located on the property would be two
to four units under the requested R-4 zoning for an approximate total population
of 6-12 persons.
c. Land uses proposed in addition to those presently existing.
The property is currently undeveloped. Other properties in the area are
developed with single family residences mostly consisting of manufactured
housing with one very significant site built home. Some scattered commercial
developments also exist in the immediate area of Riversands Road. Moab
Adventure Center stores some of the company's busses in a large yard and
World Wide River Expeditions has a very large compound to the north. The
proposed multi -family use will be a good `fit" for the area and may lead to more
development of this type of residential use on adjacent properties.
d. The assessed valuation of the current properties or proposed uses.
$33,220.00 (The Grand County Assessors Office shows an area of .51 acres for
this location.)
e. The potential demand for various municipal services, especially those
requiring capital improvements.
0
Planning Commission
PL-09-008
Valley Vista Annexation
January 02. 2009
Water service is currently provided by the city at this time.
f. Recommendations of other local government jurisdictions regarding the
proposal and potential impact of the annexation.
Nothing at this time has been received because it is so early in the process.
g. How the proposed area, and/or its potential land uses would contribute to the
achievement of the goals and policies of the city.
This criteria is perhaps the most difficult to address. Historically, residential uses
do not contribute significantly to the maintenance of infrastructure as do
commercial developments because no additional revenue is realized. This
observation has been made by many local jurisdictions in efforts to justify
annexing commercial development for its increases in sales or property taxes
while discouraging residential annexations because it costs money to maintain
the infrastructure with no direct cost offsets.
However, it must be recognized that residential uses provide dwelling space for
consumers of goods purchased from merchants in the commercial districts and
the housing also provides homes for the working population so the stores and
services remain open to generate the much needed sales tax revenue.
Also, some annexations are really about management of development on fringe
parcels so that development of these properties will agree with the master plan
and have the presentation that is desired by the fabric of the community. This
annexation may be more about managing the growth pattern of the area that is
similar to that on nearby tracts located in the city.
h. Identification of any special districts or county departments that are currently
providing services. If the proposed area is receiving services that are to be
assumed by the city, a statement should be included indicating that steps can be
taken to assure an effective transition in the delivery of services. A timetable for
extending services should be included if the city is unable to provide services
immediately. If the proposed area is receiving services that are not going to be
assumed by the city a statement to that effect will be included in the annexation
agreement.
Services provided by the county include minimal maintenance of Riversands
Road. According to local residents, the county occasionally blades accumulated
sand off of the driving area of the street. Road maintenance will be assumed by
the city.
i. If an application for annexation includes a specific proposal for urban
development, an understanding as to the provision of improvements should be
concluded between the city and the applicant.
4
Planning Commission
PL-09-008
Valley Vista Annexation
January 02,2009
The applicant has expressed a desire to construct "affordable housing': This
development can be clearly described in the pre -annexation agreement that will
be reviewed under separate notice and hearing before Council.
j. New annexations should create areas in which services can be provided
efficiently. The annexation should not create geographically isolated areas, areas
for which the provision of services would be costly or difficult, or an area in which
surface water runoff would create multi -jurisdictional problems.
This annexation already satisfies this requirement. As noted above services are
existing on the lot.
k. The tax consequences for affected entities should be addressed.
See G below.
In order to facilitate orderly growth, the following city policies will apply to every
annexation proposal. However, compliance with any policy not expressly required by
state law is not mandatory, and failure to comply with any policy not expressly required
by state law shall in no way affect or jeopardize an annexation petition that otherwise
meets the standards established in the Utah Code.
a. The city's policy is to consider annexation only in those areas where the city
has the potential to provide urban services (either directly or through interlocal
cooperative agreement). These areas may include locations served or to be
served by city utilities, electrical service, police and fire protection facilities, etc.
b. The city declares its interest in those areas identified in this policy declaration
and other areas lying within one-half mile of the city's boundary. Any urban
development as defined by state law proposed within this specified area is
subject to review and approval of the city as provided in U.C.A. 10-2-418, as
amended.
c. Due to the extraterritorial powers granted as part of the Utah Boundary
Commission Act, the city may exercise its initiative to prepare and adopt a
general plan for future development in those extraterritorial areas of interest for
future annexation, as indicated in this policy declaration. This general plan will
define proposed land uses, nature, and density of development desired by the
city in each particular area. Once this ordinance is adopted, any proposed
development in an area to be annexed must conform to the general plan,
notwithstanding said plan may be amended from time to time as deemed
necessary and appropriate.
d. It is the policy of the city to require new development in annexed areas to
comply with all city standards and regulatory laws. Proposed actions to be taken
to overcome deficiencies should be identified and costs estimated.
e. To avoid creation of islands and peninsulas, unincorporated territory and
publicly -owned land such as roadways, schools, parks or recreational land, may
0
Planning Commission
PL-09-008
Valley Vista Annexation
January 02, 2009
be annexed as part of other logical annexations.
f. In order to facilitate orderly growth and development in the city, the planning
commission may review a proposed annexation and make recommendations to
the city council concerning the parcel to be annexed, the effect on city
development, and the recommended zoning district designation for the proposed
annexed area. Review by the planning commission is not a requirement for
annexation, and approval from the planning commission is not necessary
for annexation.
g. The city council shall designate the zoning for the territory being annexed in
the ordinance annexing the territory. The zoning designations must be consistent
with the general plan. The city council shall not be bound by the zoning
designations for the territory prior to annexation. Nothing in this section shall be
construed as allowing the city council to change zoning designations in areas
that are already within the municipal boundaries, without following the
procedures for zoning amendments found in the city code.
h. Landowners petitioning for annexation must file an application and follow the
procedures for annexation required by state law and the procedures specified by
the city.
i. The city may require an annexation fee reasonable to the cost incurred as part
of the annexation process.
j. From time to time, the city may amend this master annexation policy
declaration. This policy declaration, including maps, may be amended by the city
council after at least fourteen days' notice and public hearing. Annexation policy
declarations for individual annexations may be considered amendments to this
master annexation policy declaration and likewise require adequate notice and
public hearing as herein specified.
D. The character of the community.
1. The areas anticipated for future annexation contain a wide variety of
land uses. There is vacant land, as well as residentially developed
property, and property developed and being developed for commercial
uses.
2. The city was incorporated in December 20, 1902 and has entertained
numerous proposals for annexation since that time. Recent interest in
annexation has been shown by many surrounding property owners. This
policy declaration will help to define those areas that the city will consider
in a favorable manner.
E. The need for municipal services in developing unincorporated areas.
1. The city recognizes that municipal services to developed areas which
may be annexed should, to the greatest extent possible, be provided by
the city. It may, however negotiate service agreements in annexing areas.
2. For developing unincorporated areas to be annexed to the city, general
government services and public safety service will be provided by the city
6
Planning Commission
P1-09-008
Valley Vista Annexation
January 02, 2009
as the area is annexed and developed. Where feasible and in the public
interest to the citizens of the city, public utility services will be provided by
the city or through the appropriate utility companies or improvement
districts.
3. Subsequent policy declarations on individual parcels will address
provision of utility service to that particular area. Determination of how
utility service will be provided to developing areas proposed for
annexation will be developed following discussion with the public works
department and other appropriate utility officials or entities.
F. Financing and time frame for the extension of municipal services.
1. Those areas identified in this master policy declaration as being
favorable for annexation are located near to the city. A basic network of
collector roads presently exists in many of these areas and the city can
readily extend such services as police protection, street maintenance,
and general government services. Unless otherwise specified, city
services for police and street maintenance will begin in newly annexed
areas immediately following the effective date of annexation.
2. Services for newly annexed areas will be provided for out of the
general and/or enterprise funds. However, it is the city's policy that all
new development in areas requiring service bears the burden of providing
necessary facilities. If and when the property sought to be annexed is
developed, the developer will have to construct and install appropriate
municipal service facilities such as streets, curb, gutter, sidewalk, water
and sewer lines, as provided by city code. Construction of water and/or
sewer line extensions involving multiple properties will be phased to
coincide with the financial readiness of said property owners and the city.
3. If services in an annexed area are substandard, then the financing of
improvements to bring the area up to city standards may be necessary
through such means as a special improvement district. The city may
decline to annex areas that contain significant substandard
improvements. The site annexation policy declaration, submitted with
individual annexations, will identify a schedule for necessary
improvements to the area.
4. Unless otherwise agreed by the city in writing, the annexation of real
property into the municipal, limits shall not obligate the city to construct or
install utilities or other public infrastructure. The decision to extend or
install such improvements shall be vested solely in the discretion of the
city council.
G. The estimate of tax consequences. The estimate of tax consequences to
residents in both new and old territory of the city resulting from the proposed
future annexations cannot be accurately assessed at this time. As each
annexation proposal occurs, the city will review the tax consequences of that
annexation.
H. Affected entities. The following is a list of potentially -affected entities, to which
copies of the annexation policy declaration has been supplied prior to its
adoption. In addition, as annexation proposals occur, the entities affected by the
Planning Commission
PL-09-008
Valley Vista Annexation
January 02, 2009
proposed annexation will be notified.
Grand County
125 East Center
Moab, Utah 84532
Grand County School District
264 South 400 East
Moab, Utah 84532
Moab Fire Department
45 South 100 East
Moab, Utah 84532
Grand Water & Sewer Agency
3025 East Spanish Trail
Moab, Utah 84532
259-8121
Grand County Hospital Service
District
245 West Williams Way
Moab, Utah 84532
Health Department of
Southeastern Utah
P.O. Box 800
Price, Utah
Recommendation
Cemetery District
P.O. Box 64
Moab, Utah 84532
Moab Mosquito Abatement
District
P.O. Box 142
Moab, Utah 84532
Grand County Library Board
25 South 100 East
Moab, Utah 84532
Solid Waste District
P.O. Office Box 980
Moab, Utah 84532
Recreation District
P.O. Box 715
Moab, Utah 84532
Grand County Boundary
Commission
125 East Center
Moab, Utah 84532
Staff recommends that the requested R-4 multi -family zone for this property be favorably
sent to Council for acceptance.
P:\2009\Correspondence\PL-09-008 valley vista annexation to PC.doc
Chapter 1.32
CITY ANNEXATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Sections:
1.32.010
1.32.020
1.32.030
Annexation petition.
Annexation procedure.
Annexation policy plan.
1.32.010 Annexation petition.
A. An annexation petition is required by Utah State
Code to initiate annexation of properties into the city of
Moab, except when the parcel to be annexed is an island or
peninsula contiguous to the city; and
1. Has a majority of residential or commercial
development;
2. Requires delivery of municipal services; and,
3. Has been provided most or all municipal services
for more than one year.
B. Where applicable, annexation petitions are to be
filed with the city recorder and contain:
1. Signatures of a majority of the private real
property owners of the area proposed for annexation;
2. Signatures of the private real property owners
who account for one-third value of all private property
within that same area;
3. Be accompanied by an accurate and recordable map
that is prepared and signed by a licensed surveyor; and,
4. Signatories who are designated as sponsors of the
petition for future contact.
C. If practicable and feasible, boundaries of the
area proposed for annexation should be drawn:
1. Along existing jurisdictional boundaries;
2. To eliminate islands and peninsulas of territory
not receiving services;
3. To promote the efficient delivery of services;
and,
4. To encourage the equitable distribution of
community resources and obligations. (Ord. 03-02 (part),
2003)
1.32.020 Annexation procedure.
A. The city recorder, upon receiving a petition for
annexation, shall:
1. Submit the petition to the city council, which
shall accept the petition for further consideration or
reject the petition fourteen days.
2. If the petition is rejected by the city
notification shall be sent to the county clerk and to the
sponsors of the petition within five days of the denial.
3. If accepted by the city council, the petition
shall be reviewed by the city recorder for completeness and
compliance with applicable law, which review and
certification shall be completed within thirty days of
acceptance. If the petition complies, the city recorder
shall certify the petition and provide notice of same to
the city council.
4. Within ten days of receipt notice of
certification by the city council, notification of the
proposed annexation shall be published in a newspaper of
general circulation for three consecutive weeks.
5. Within twenty days of receipt of notice of
certification by the city council, notification of said
annexation shall be sent to all affected entities listed in
1.32.030.H.
B. Upon certification by the city recorder the
petition or application may be submitted to the planning
commission for analysis and review according to the
annexation policy plan and for recommendations with respect
to the appropriate zoning.
C. Protests to the proposed annexation shall be:
1. Filed no later than thirty days after receipt by
the city council of certification from the city recorder.
2. Protests may be filed by the legislative bodies
of affected entities listed in 1.32.030.H.
3. If protests are filed, the city council may deny
the annexation at the next meeting, or it may await the
decision by the boundary commission.
4. If no protests are filed, the city council may
approve the annexation at a public hearing held after
providing not less than seven days advance notice.
5. The boundary commission shall hear protests
within thirty days of the deadline for filling said
protests.
6. Within thirty days of initiating hearings on
protests filed, the boundary commission shall render a
written decision.
7. The city council may deny or grant annexation
after receiving the decision of the boundary commission
approving the annexation. In the event of denial of the
annexation by the boundary commission the city council
shall deny the annexation. (Ord. 03-02 (part), 2003)
1.32.030 Annexation policy plan.
A. Pursuant to U.C.A. 10-2-401.5, the city hereby
adopts the following annexation policy declaration.
1. Sound urban development is essential to the
continued economic development of this state;
2. Municipalities are created to provide urban
governmental services essential for sound urban development
and for the protection of public health, safety and welfare
in residential, commercial and industrial areas, and in
areas undergoing development;
3. Municipal boundaries should be extended, in
accordance with specific standards, to include areas where
a high quality of urban governmental services is needed and
can be provided for the protection of public health, safety
and welfare and to avoid the inequities of double taxation
and the proliferation of special service districts;
4. Areas annexed to municipalities in accordance
with appropriate standards should receive the services
provided by the annexing municipality as soon as possible
following the annexation;
5. Areas annexed to municipalities should include
all of the urbanized unincorporated areas contiguous to
municipalities, securing to residents within the areas a
voice in the selection of their government;
6. Decisions with respect to municipal boundaries
and urban development need to be made with adequate
consideration of the effect of the proposed actions on
adjacent areas and on the interests of other government
entities, on the need for and cost of local government
services, and the ability to deliver the services under the
proposed actions and on factors related to population
growth and density and the geography of the area; and
B. Map showing the anticipated future extent of the
city of Moab's boundaries and areas that are more readily
available for service.
1. This portion of the city of Moab's Master
Annexation Policy declaration describes the geographic
areas considered most favorable for future city expansion
2. The map (see Appendix "A") visually displays the
existing boundaries of the city of Moab in a green line and
the future boundaries by a black line. The future
boundaries include the following description:
a. Sections 26, 27, 34, 35 and 36 of Township 25
South Range 21 East; and,
b. Sections 1, 2, and 12 of Township 26 South Range
21 East; and,
c. Sections 6, 7 and portion of 8 of Township 26
South Range 22 East.
C. Criteria as required by state law, together with
additional criteria and policies for city acceptance of an
annexation.
1. The city endorses the intent of the Utah
Annexation Act, U.C.A. 10-2-401, et seq., as amended.
Criteria for annexation of property to the city are as
follows:
a. The property must be contiguous to the boundaries
of the city.
b. The property must lie within the area projected
for the city municipal expansion.
c. The property must not be included within the
boundaries of another incorporated municipality.
d. The annexation must not create unincorporated
islands within the boundaries of the city.
e. The property proposed to be annexed hereunder
will not be annexed for the sole purpose of acquiring
municipal revenue or for retarding the capacity of any
other municipality to annex into the same or related area.
2. The city will evaluate the following for each
annexation:
a. Compliance with all requirements of appropriate
state code provisions.
b. The current and potential population of the area,
and the current residential densities.
c. Land uses proposed in addition to those presently
existing.
d. The assessed valuation of the current properties
or proposed uses.
e. The potential demand for various municipal
services, especially those requiring capital improvements.
f. Recommendations of other local government
jurisdictions regarding the proposal and potential impact
of the annexation.
g. How the proposed area, and/or its potential land
uses would contribute to the achievement of the goals and
policies of the city.
h. Identification of any special districts or county
departments that are currently providing services. If the
proposed area is receiving services that are to be assumed
by the city, a statement should be included indicating that
steps can be taken to assure an effective transition in the
delivery of services. A timetable for extending services
should be included if the city is unable to provide
services immediately. If the proposed area is receiving
services that are not going to be assumed by the city a
statement to that effect will be included in the annexation
agreement.
i. If an application for annexation includes a
specific proposal for urban development, an understanding
as to the provision of improvements should be concluded
between the city and the applicant.
j. New annexations should create areas in which
services can be provided efficiently. The annexation
should not create geographically isolated areas, areas for
which the provision of services would be costly or
difficult, or an area in which surface water runoff would
create multi -jurisdictional problems.
k. The tax consequences for affected entities should
be addressed.
3. In order to facilitate orderly growth, the
following city policies will apply to every annexation
proposal. However, compliance with any policy not
expressly required by state law is not mandatory, and
failure to comply with any policy not expressly required by
state law shall in no way affect or jeopardize an
annexation petition that otherwise meets the standards
established in the Utah Code.
a. The city's policy is to consider annexation only
in those areas where the city has the potential to provide
urban services (either directly or through interlocal
cooperative agreement). These areas may include locations
served or to be served by city utilities, electrical
service, police and fire protection facilities, etc.
b. The city declares its interest in those areas
identified in this policy declaration and other areas lying
within one-half mile of the city's boundary. Any urban
development as defined by state law proposed within this
specified area is subject to review and approval of the
city as provided in U.C.A. 10-2-418, as amended.
c. Due to the extraterritorial powers granted as
part of the Utah Boundary Commission Act, the city may
exercise its initiative to prepare and adopt a general plan
for future development in those extraterritorial areas of
interest for future annexation, as indicated in this policy
declaration. This general plan will define proposed land
uses, nature, and density of development desired by the
city in each particular area. Once this ordinance is
adopted, any proposed development in an area to be annexed
must conform to the general plan, notwithstanding said plan
may be amended from time to time as deemed necessary and
appropriate.
(/)
d. It is the policy of the city to require new
development in annexed areas to comply with all city
standards and regulatory laws. Proposed actions to be
taken to overcome deficiencies should be identified and
costs estimated.
e. To avoid creation of islands and peninsulas,
unincorporated territory and publicly -owned land such as
roadways, schools, parks or recreational land, may be
annexed as part of other logical annexations.
f. In order to facilitate orderly growth and
development in the city, the planning commission may review
a proposed annexation and make recommendations to the city
council concerning the parcel to be annexed, the effect on
city development, and the recommended zoning district
designation for the proposed annexed area. Review by the
planning commission is not a requirement for annexation,
and approval from the planning commission is not necessary
for annexation.
g. The city council shall designate the zoning for
the territory being annexed in the ordinance annexing the
territory. The zoning designations must be consistent with
the general plan. The city council shall not be bound by
the zoning designations for the territory prior to
annexation. Nothing in this section shall be construed as
allowing the city council to change zoning designations in
areas that are already within the municipal boundaries,
without following the procedures for zoning amendments
found in the city code.
h. Landowners petitioning for annexation must file
an application and follow the procedures for annexation
required by state law and the procedures specified by the
city.
i. The city may require an annexation fee reasonable
to the cost incurred as part of the annexation process.
j. From time to time, the city may amend this master
annexation policy declaration. This policy declaration,
including maps, may be amended by the city council after at
least fourteen days' notice and public hearing. Annexation
policy declarations for individual annexations may be
considered amendments to this master annexation policy
declaration and likewise require adequate notice and public
hearing as herein specified.
D. The character of the community.
1. The areas anticipated for future annexation
contain a wide variety of land uses. There is vacant land,
as well as residentially developed property, and property
developed and being developed for commercial uses.
2. The city was incorporated in December 20, 1902
and has entertained numerous proposals for annexation since
that time. Recent interest in annexation has been shown by
many surrounding property owners. This policy declaration
will help to define those areas that the city will consider
in a favorable manner.
E. The need for municipal services in developing
unincorporated areas.
1. The city recognizes that municipal services to
developed areas which may be annexed should, to the
greatest extent possible, be provided by the city. It may,
however negotiate service agreements in annexing areas.
2. For developing unincorporated areas to be annexed
to the city, general government services and public safety
service will be provided by the city as the area is annexed
and developed. Where feasible and in the public interest
to the citizens of the city, public utility services will
be provided by the city or through the appropriate utility
companies or improvement districts.
3. Subsequent policy declarations on individual
parcels will address provision of utility service to that
particular area. Determination of how utility service will
be provided to developing areas proposed for annexation
will be developed following discussion with the public
works department and other appropriate utility officials or
entities.
F. Financing and time frame for the extension of
municipal services.
1. Those areas identified in this master policy
declaration as being favorable for annexation are located
near to the city. A basic network of collector roads
presently exists in many of these areas and the city can
readily extend such services as police protection, street
maintenance, and general government services. Unless
otherwise specified, city services for police and street
maintenance will begin in newly annexed areas immediately
following the effective date of annexation.
2. Services for newly annexed areas will be provided
for out of the general and/or enterprise funds. However,
it is the city's policy that all new development in areas
requiring service bears the burden of providing necessary
facilities. If and when the property sought to be annexed
is developed, the developer will have to construct and
install appropriate municipal service facilities such as
streets, curb, gutter, sidewalk, water and sewer lines, as
provided by city code. Construction of water and/or sewer
line extensions involving multiple properties will be
phased to coincide with the financial readiness of said
property owners and the city.
3. If services in an annexed area are substandard,
then the financing of improvements to bring the area up to
city standards may be necessary through such means as a
special improvement district. The city may decline to
annex areas that contain significant substandard
improvements. The site annexation policy declaration,
submitted with individual annexations, will identify a
schedule for necessary improvements to the area.
4. Unless otherwise agreed by the city in writing,
the annexation of real property into the municipal, limits
shall not obligate the city to construct or install
utilities or other public infrastructure. The decision to
extend or install such improvements shall be vested solely
in the discretion of the city council.
G. The estimate of tax consequences. The estimate
of tax consequences to residents in both new and old
territory of the city resulting from the proposed future
annexations cannot be accurately assessed at this time. As
each annexation proposal occurs, the city will review the
tax consequences of that annexation.
H. Affected entities. The following is a list of
potentially -affected entities, to which copies of the
annexation policy declaration has been supplied prior to
its adoption. In addition, as annexation proposals occur,
the entities affected by the proposed annexation will be
notified.
Grand County
125 East Center
Moab, Utah 84532
Grand County School District
264 South 400 East
Moab, Utah 84532
Moab Fire Department
45 South 100 East
Moab, Utah 84532
Grand Water & Sewer Agency
3025 East Spanish Trail
Moab, Utah 84532
259-8121
Grand County Hospital Service District
245 West Williams Way
Moab, Utah 84532
Health Department of Southeastern Utah
P.O. Box 800
Price, Utah
Cemetery District
P.O. Box 64
Moab, Utah 84532
Moab Mosquito Abatement District
P.O. Box 142
Moab, Utah 84532
Grand County Library Board
25 South 100 East
Moab, Utah 84532
Solid Waste District
P.O. Office Box 980
Moab, Utah 84532
Recreation District
P.O. Box 715
Moab, Utah 84532
Grand County Boundary Commission
125 East Center
Moab, Utah 84532
6/\
bilituartiliktonat.biel
To: Moab Governing Body
From: David Olsen
CC: Donna Metzler
Date: March 6, 2009
RE: CDBG 2nd Public Hearing
To comply with Federal Community Development Block Grant
requirements, a second public hearing must be held to inform the
public of the project the City selected to work on with CDBG funds.
The project selected was the re -roofing, stuccoing and insulating the
Virginian Apartments located at 300 South 91 East.
a
"PRIVATE CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE"
LOCAL CONSENT
Date:
Attn: DABC Licensing & Compliance Section
, [ ] City [ ] Town [ ] County
hereby grants its consent to the issuance of a private club liquor license to:
Business Name:
Applicant / Business Owner: �.()G.i Aft, _S-IN-f \ ,C�_
Location Address: 3.-+ C'OU 11-t t-(An r4) t�p-pkg V 1 ScE's-S,)--.
Pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code 32A-5, this license allows for the storage, sale and consumption of liquor on
the premises. Furthermore, the applicant has met all ordinances and requirements relating to issuance of local
business license(s).
[ ] Check if applicable
LOCAL CONSENT FOR PROXIMITY VARIANCE
In accordance with Utah Code 32A-5-101(7),(8)&(9),
the local authority also grants consent to a variance
regarding the proximity of this establishment relative
to a public or private school, church, public library,
public playground, or park.
Authorized Signature
Print Name / Title
DATE PAID:
AMOUNT PAID:
RECEIPT NO.:
CITY OF MOAB
RETAIL BEER* LICENSE APPLICATION
ea ("5 a 0 . 4f�01� atL 21 EAST CENTER STREET
6 S0. Zp d +w I c"4",M0AB, UTAH 84532
(435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135
6. DS1q PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB
CI CLASS I FEE:
O CLASS II FEE:
®. PRIVATE CLUB
▪ CLASS III FEE:
O CLASS IV FEE:
LICENSE #:
$180.00
$180.00
$650.00
$80.00
$80.00
APPLICANT'S PERSONAL INFORMATION
FULL NAME: "."-'D L jAreA SA) DE-Q.
HOME ADDRESS:
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER:
CITY:
HOME PHONE: Abliallit
1-10.4,6 STATE: V ZIP:
a
DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE:
DATE OF BIRTH:
BUSINESS INFORMATION
BUSINESS NAME: ED tar; MCj
BUSINESS ADDRESS: .5-4 So Iptv-;
SALES TAX ID #: _
BUSINESS PHONE: 'Z - 6 0o g
BUSINESS MAILING ADDRESS: 1LN CITY: (IQ g STATE: VT T ZIP: g(fs-'3.2._.
WARNING!! ALL LICENSES, EXCEPT CLASS III, REQUIRE A STATE
LICENSE! STATE APPROVAL COULD TAKE 30 DAYS OR MORE TO PROCESS!
CONTACT THE STATE NOW!
THIS APPLICATION IS MADE FOR A LICENSE TO SELL BEER* UNDER THE FOLLOWING LICENSE: (CHECK ONE)
1.
❑ CLASS I
0 CLASS II
ca PRIVATE CLUB
0 CLASS III
❑ CLASS 1V
Retail License shall entitle Licensee to sell Beer only on the premises licensed on draught and
in original containers, for consumption on or off the premises, in accordance with the Liquor
Control Act and the Ordinances of the City.
Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer in the original containers, on the premises
for consumption on the premises, in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and Ordinances
of the City, and shall be issued solely to Restaurants, Cafes and other establishments whose
primary purpose is the dispensing of food.
Same conditions as Class I and Class 11 Beer Licenses.
Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed in original
containers, for consumption off the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and
the Ordinances of the City.
Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed on draught and
in original containers, for consumption on the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control
Act and the Ordinances of the City limited to the dates specified.
Will you also serve liquor, wine or heavy beer (over 3.2% by weight)?
171 NO ® YES (Requires `Local Consent' approved by City Council prior to State approval.)
2. List brands of beer proposed to be sold by the applicant within the City of Moab:
F� r1c q—c t t r t rhi l✓sS CO OAS (Ai
*Beer application is for 3.2% by weight only. Also requires a State license. 02/07/05
(o e't
CITY OF MOAB
INFORMED CONSENT AND RELEASE OF LIABILITY
In connection with my application for a Beer License with Moab City, I hereby authorize the forenamed
agency as well as the Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification to investigate my past and present work,
education, and law enforcement records to ascertain any and all information, which may be pertinent to
licensing regulations. I do hereby release all person, firms, agencies, companies, groups or installations,
whomsgever, from any dama s of/or resulting from release shall function as an original.
Signature of A
Si
e of Witness
State of Utah
County of
5�1,-) SI4 YVe n / 0
Print Name of Ahlicant Date
/�4: si
FZ
Print Name of Witness Date
On the 2Y"5k day of M car C\•-• 2 bc', personally appeared before me
-6),v0 cm-09 S f‘ Lka
the same.
BRENDA KERBY
Notary Public
State of Utah
Comm. No. 576444
My Comm. Wm Nov 17. 2012
My Commission Expires:
, who duly acknowledged to me that they executed
Ka.�—�
Notary Public
Residing in: (--) County
-a
RETAIL BEER LICENSE APPLICATION
Submit completed application and attachments to the City Treasurer for processing.
The applicant represents that they possess all the qualifications of a licensee as set forth in Section 32,
Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 and that they will faithfully comply with and have faithfully
complied with the Utah Liquor Control Act.
This application is submitted to the City of Moab as an inducement for the issuance of a retailer's business
beer license in accordance with Section 32, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953. The undersigned
applicant hereby agrees and promises that if such beer license is granted, the applicant will faithfully comply
with all provisions of the Utah Liquor Control Act and regulations of the Utah Liquor control Commission
adopted pursuant thereto, and the ordinances of the City of Moab, and in particular that they will faithfully
comply with Section 32, Chapter 6 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 re ing to reporting and payment of
excise tax, and with regulation 4 relating to advertising, regulation 4- elating to labeling and advertising,
and regulation 5 relating to unfair competition and unlawful practice.
STATE OF UTAH
: ss
COUNTY OF GRAND
is Signature
E wo,r-a9 , being first duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says: That
he/she is the applicant above named; that he /she has read the foregoing application, and knows and
understands the contents thereof; that the same is true to his/her own knowledge.
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this/21 day of IN\ att
BRENDA KERBY
Notary Public
State of Utah
Comm. No. 516444
Aty Conan. Beokee Nov t r. 2012
DO ,
\,
Notary Public
"PRIVATE CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE"
LOCAL CONSENT
Date:
Attn: DABC Licensing & Compliance Section
fn D a b , [/j City [ ] Town [ ] County
hereby grants its consent to the issuance of a private club liquor license to:
Business Name: iY) o 0,6 R r cwc rs
Applicant / Business Owner: ITI i c.k a c,(
Location Address: 6 8(0 ,S a/ a ; ,.t
O. ptijer-
LLC t 84 /72aa6 LirecaGry
f)? 0 4 L c er 8Ys,3z..
Pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code 32A-5, this license allows for the storage, sale and consumption of liquor on
the premises. Furthermore, the applicant has met all ordinances and requirements relating to issuance of local
business license(s).
[ ] Check if applicable
LOCAL CONSENT FOR PROXIMITY VARIANCE
In accordance with Utah Code 32A-5-101(7),(8)&(9),
the local authority also grants consent to a variance
regarding the proximity of this establishment relative
to a public or private school, church, public library,
public playground, or park.
Authorized Signature
Print Name / Title
3.02.09 page 7 of 55
(I-3
DATE PAID:
AMOUNT PAID:
RECEIPT NO.:
CITY OF MOAB
RETAIL BEER* LICENSE APPLICATION
(45a0, a.Pp/i t.4 217 EAST CENTER STREET
4.5.0. 00 �.� wt. 0.44-.. r MOAB, UTAH 84532
F ; c,e....s�) (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135
b . / c. t.o s t, PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB
❑ CLASS 1 FEE:
❑ CLASS II FEE:
IETPRIVATE CLUB
❑ CLASS III FEE:
❑ CLASS Iv FEE:
LICENSE #:
$180.00
$180.00
$650.00
$80.00
$80.00
APPLICANT'S PERSONAL INFORMATION
FULL NAME: 1
HOME ADDRESS:
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER:
DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER He STATE:
HOME PHONE: _
CITY: Moak STATE: (fi ZIP:
DATE OF BIRTH: 4111111.09110
BUSINESS INFORMATION
BUSINESS NAME:
VA /r1 Y V eltG IA/C d
BUSINESS ADDRESS: (pet [Q J
BUSINESS MAILING ADDRESS: Sa,1tV1 QJ
SALES TAX ID #
BUSINESS PHONE:
STATE:
17333
ZIP: b4532
WARNING!! ALL LICENSES, EXCEPT CLASS III, REQUIRE A STATE
LICENSE! STATE APPROVAL COULD TAKE 30 DAYS OR MORE TO PROCESS!
CONTACT THE STATE NOW!
THIS APPLICATION IS MADE FOR A LICENSE TO SELL BEER* UNDER THE FOLLOWING LICENSE: (CHECK ONE)
CI CLASS I
O CLASS II
CORIVATE CLUB
O CLASS III
❑ CLASS IV
Retail License shall entitle Licensee to sell Beer only on the premises licensed on draught and
in original containers, for consumption on or off the premises, in accordance with the Liquor
Control Act and the Ordinances of the City.
Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer in the original containers, on the premises
for consumption on the premises, in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and Ordinances
of the City, and shall be issued solely to Restaurants, Cafes and other establishments whose
primary purpose is the dispensing of food.
Same conditions as Class I and Class II Beer Licenses.
Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed in original
containers, for consumption off the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and
the Ordinances of the City.
Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed on draught and
in original containers, for consumption on the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control
Act and the Ordinances of the City limited to the dates specified.
1 • Will you also serve liquor, wine or heavy beer (over 3.2% by weight)?
CI NO EYES (Requires `Local Consent' approved by City Council prior to State approval.)
2. List brands of beer proposed to be sold by the applicant within the City of Moab:
Q,Ms,Zudweiser, goo,ao Sx-ev,e,,,y
*Beer application is for 3.2% by weight only. Also requires a State license.
02/07/05
1 A ""
CITY OF MOAB
INFORMED CONSENT AND RELEASE OF LIABILITY
In connection with my application for a Beer License with Moab City, I hereby authorize the forenamed
agency as well as the Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification to investigate my past and present work,
education, and law enforcement records to ascertain any and all information, which may be pertinent to
licensing regulations. I do hereby release all person, firms, agencies, companies, groups or installations,
whomsoever, from any damages of/or resulting from release shall function as an original.
dvl c.(4AeL
Signature of Applicant Print Name of Applicant
Date
-a7
.Tcnrti c . %�o Ss 2— G —o
Print Name of Witness
State of Utah )
County of c' oar-ci )
On the t.9+h day of tr\No,r - _.b (5Q
N\t\, c)%ae..)% M`, e-r'
the same.
_ BRENDA KERBY
Notary Public
State of Utah 1
Comm. No. 576444
My Comm. Expires Nor 17.2012
My Commission Expires:
, personally appeared before me
Date
, who duly acknowledged to me that they executed
Notary Public
Residing in: C a. County
RETAIL BEER LICENSE APPLICATION
Submit completed application and attachments to the City Treasurer for processing.
The applicant represents that they possess all the qualifications of a licensee as set forth in Section 32,
Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 and that they will faithfully comply with and have faithfully
complied with the Utah Liquor Control Act.
This application is submitted to the City of Moab as an inducement for the issuance of a retailer's business
beer license in accordance with Section 32, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953. The undersigned
applicant hereby agrees and promises that if such beer license is granted, the applicant will faithfully comply
with all provisions of the Utah Liquor Control Act and regulations of the Utah Liquor control Commission
adopted pursuant thereto, and the ordinances of the City of Moab, and in particular that they will faithfully
comply with Section 32, Chapter 6 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 relating to reporting and payment of
excise tax, and with regulation 4 relating to advertising, regulation 4-A relating to labeling and advertising,
and regulation 5 relating to unfair competition and unlawful practice.
-77/,,i-
Applicant's Signature
STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF GRAND
meir‘ Q2A \\.e... (' , being first duly swom, on his/her oath deposes and says: That
he/she is the applicant above named; that he /she has read the foregoing application, and knows and
understands the contents thereof; that the same is true to his/her own knowledge.
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this Co*" day of Y\Ao.f e Aem , 90OQ .
1
BRENDA KERBY
Notary Public I
State of Utah
Comm. No. 576444
My Comm. Expires Nov 17, 2012 NI
Zp.sz-,ast, V___,s1,9cuj_
Notary Public
New Page 1
Moab City Council January 11, 2009
Moab, Utah
Council Members,
The Western Star Riders are hosting their 6th annualCanyonlands Cruise -In in Moab on June 16th thru
19th 2009. This year promises to be our largest turnout ever with an estimated 150-200 riders in
attendance.
At this time we have already contracted with the Sleep Inn to fully book their hotel. We have also booked
a local Moab band ( Stone Fed ) to provide entertainment for our group dinner on June 17th.Moab's Old
City Park has already been reserved by us for the above date. Per the Moab City Clerk we are required to
obtain the permission of the City Council to have the electricity made available and to allow amplified
music within the park.
We understand there may be time of day restrictions concerning the music and we will be more than
happy to comply with the wishes of the Council. Also, any additional funds needed by the City of Moab
to cover the electricity usage will be paid prior to the event.If we need to appear in person before the
Council please advise us as soon as possible so we may make an appointment. We look forward to
working with the City of Moab and its merchants to make this the best Cruise -In we have ever had. If the
Council requires any further information or has any questions please contact us.
Thank You
Keith Axmacher
Vice President Western Star Riders
11152 Tumbleweed Way
Parker, Co 80138
Home 303-841-6134
Cell 303-668-1702
Page 1
L-5
February 24, 2009
Moab City Council
217 E Center Street
Moab, UT 84532
Dear Councilmembers,
This letter is to request permission to use the City
right of way for a sidewalk sale to be held on March
21-22, 2009. The hours of the sale are scheduled
to be 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. All rules and regulations
pertaining to sidewalk sales will be followed.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
4X.67ji/L-1
John Knowles
Arches Trading Post
50 S Main Street
Moab, UT 84532
(,-
��' ; N I B I S T 3 2 0 . "