Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
07.05.2016 City Council Meeting Packet
MEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 5, 2016 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fill out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the June 21, 2016 Special Council Meeting B. Minutes of the June 21, 2016 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Quote to Replace Upper Level Carpet at City Hall with MCI Inc. B. Approve Quote to Repaint Upper Level at City Hall with Snow and Sun Painting C. Approve Fireworks Display Contract with RES Specialty Pyrotechnics for Medina Celebration Day D. Resolution Accepting Resignation of Community Service Officer Brandon Wenande E. Authorize Recruitment for Community Service Officer Position VI. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VII. PRESENTATIONS A. CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant — Kevin Busscher VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Just for Kix — Site Plan Review, Hardcover Variance, Lot Combination at 45 Highway 55 — Public Hearing 1X. OLD BUSINESS A. Jeffrey -Johnson Easement Vacation - Public Hearing Continued 1. Resolution Approving the Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement at 2605Willow Drive CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS ADJOURN Posted 6/29/2016 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: June 29, 2016 DATE OF MEETING: July 5, 2016 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Quote to Replace Upper Level Carpet at City Hall with MCI Inc. — Staff received two quotes to replace the upper level carpet at city hall. Staff recommends approval of the low quote with MCI Inc. See attached quotes. B. Approve Quote to Repaint Upper Level at City Hall with Snow and Sun Painting — Staff received two quotes to repaint the upper level of city hall. Staff recommends approval of the low quote with Snow and Sun Painting. See attached quotes. C. Approve Fireworks Display Contract with RES Specialty Pyrotechnics for Medina Celebration Day — Staff recommends approval of the Display Contract Agreement with RES Specialty Pyrotechnics, Inc. for Medina Celebration Day. The City has been happy with their services in the past and they have agreed to keep the cost at $4,000. See attached letter and agreement. D. Resolution Accepting Resignation of Community Service Officer Brandon Wenande — Community Service Officer Brandon Wenande has accepted a licensed deputy sheriff position with Wright County. His last day with the Medina Police Department will be July 15, 2016. Staff recommends approving the resolution accepting his resignation. See attached memo, resolution and letter. E. Authorize Recruitment for Community Service Officer Position — Staff requests authorization to begin the recruitment process to replace Community Service Officer Brandon Wenande. See attached job posting. VII. PRESENTATIONS A. CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant — Kevin Busscher with CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant will be at the City Council meeting to present a check for $1,560 for a new radar indicator sign. See attached letter. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Just for Kix — Site Plan Review, Hardcover Variance, Lot Combination at 45 Highway 55 — Public Hearing - Clough Properties, LLC has requested approvals to construct an 18,040 square foot commercial building at property currently addressed as 45 Highway 55. The applicant intends to operate their dance studio, Just for Kix, in the structure along with a small related retail operation. The subject site is located on the eastern City border, south of Highway 55 and north of the railroad right-of-way. See attached report. Potential Motion: Direct staff to prepare resolutions approving the plat, variance, and site plan review requests for Just for Kix, upon the findings described in the staff report and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. IX. OLD BUSINESS A. Jeffrey -Johnson Lot Line Rearrangement — Glenn Jeffrey has requested a lot line rearrangement between his property at 2605 Willow Drive and neighboring property at 2505 Willow Drive. The property owners are still discussing the proposed lot line rearrangement and they are not ready for the City Council to take action on this item. The public hearing was opened at the June 21st meeting to be continued to the July 5th meeting. The City Council must reopen the public hearing, receive any comments, and then close it. No attachments for this item. Recommended Action: Open the Public Hearing, receive any comments, and then close the public hearing. XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 003711E-003725E for $50,699.46, order check numbers 44494-44544 for $162,264.21, and payroll EFT 507250-507276 for $47, 739.34. INFORMATION PACKET • Planning Depai tuient Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 21, 2016 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in special session on June 21, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. at the Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN. I. Call to Order Members present: Mitchell, Anderson, Cousineau, Martin, Pederson Members absent: Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, Public Safety Director Ed Belland and City Planner Dusty Finke II. Elm Creek Watershed Update Elm Creek Watershed Chair Doug Baines provided the City Council with a brief history of the watershed, explained the proposed $215,000 budget for 2017 (Medina's portion is 7.98%), and provided an update on the 3rd Generation plan for the watershed. The City Council thanked Chair Baines and Medina Elm Creek Representative Liz Weir for their service on the watershed. mom III. 2017 Budget — General Fund Finance Director Erin Barnhart provided the City Council with the proposed budget for 2017. Staff provided a proposed budget that includes a 2.4% overall General Fund increase. The City is also proposing a total levy increase of 1.6%. Barnhart discussed the addition of a part-time Public Works position (following the 10 year staffing plan), added maintenance funds for roads ($5,000), a proposed cost of living increase of 2%, and the need to maintain quality service levels. A very preliminary estimation shows the tax rate would decrease from 23.342% (2016) to 22.269% (2017) which is a 4.6% decrease. Council directed staff to move forward with the proposed 2017 budget. Adjournment Mitchell closed the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Medina City Council Special Meeting Minutes 1 June 21, 2016 DRAFT 2 3 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 21, 2016 4 5 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on June 21, 2016 at 7:00 6 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Mitchell presided. 7 8 I. ROLL CALL 9 10 Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, Martin, and Mitchell. 11 12 Members absent: None. 13 14 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer 15 Jim Stremel, City Planner Dusty Finke, City Finance Director Erin Barnhart, Public 16 Works Director Steve Scherer, Chief of Police Ed Belland, and Recording Secretary 17 Amanda Staple. 18 19 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) 20 21 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) 22 The agenda was approved as presented. 23 24 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:00 p.m.) 25 26 A. Approval of the June 7, 2016 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 27 It was noted on page three, line 16, it should state, "...be seen result in City tax 28 increase..." On page three, line 49, it should state, "...should at least be limited to the 29 losses caused by the City's negligence." On page three, line 30, it should state, 30 "...compensation for to the City for providing regional assistance." On page three, line 31 34, it should sate, "...per year for that use as a lease for a course of approximately ten 32 years..." On page four, line 27, it should state, "Martins Martin..." On page four, line 50, 33 it should state, "...Mrs. Leatherdale..." On page four, line 15, it should state, 34 "...language included regarding a provision to recover..." On page four, line eight, "...OR 35 contract as contract work..." On page four, line 33, it should state, "...Comprehensive 36 Plans of surrounding cities." On page five, line two, it should state, "..."Mrs. 37 Leatherdale..." On page six, lines 44, it should state, "...developed the road project is 38 not just pavement and base and staff..." On page six, line 48, it should state, "...road 39 itself, stormwater improvements, and turn lane improvements for from Homestead Trail." 40 On page six, line 50, it should state, "...storm water improvements as well as grading..." 41 42 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the June 7, 2016 regular City 43 Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 44 45 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:07 p.m.) 46 47 A. Approve Quote from Ditter for Ductless Air Conditioning System in City 48 Council Chambers 49 B. Resolution No. 2016-47 Appointing Election Judges for the August 9, 2016 50 Primary Election and the November 8, 2016 General Election Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 June 21, 2016 1 C. Resolution No. 2016-48 Appointing Absentee Ballot Board Election Judges 2 for the August 9, 2016 Primary Election and the November 8, 2016 General 3 Election 4 D. Resolution No. 2016-49 Recognizing Charmane Domino for 10 Years of 5 Service to the City of Medina 6 E. Resolution No. 2016-50 Approving Proposed Transfers and Assignment of 7 Fund Reserves 8 F. Call for a Concurrent City Council/Planning Commission Workshop to 9 Discuss the Draft Comprehensive Plan on August 3, 2016 at 5 p.m. at City 10 Hall 11 G. Approve Proposal for Engineering Services on Pinto Drive Quite Zone 12 Application with TKDA 13 H. Resolution No. 2016-51 Amending 2016 Appointments and Designations to 14 Various City Services, Authorities, Commissions and Agencies 15 Anderson commended Pederson for the excellent job he did as a public safety liaison 16 and thanked Martin for her willingness to step up and take on that challenge. 17 18 Pederson stated that he did not feel he was making a difference and therefore chose to 19 step down from that appointment and believes that Martin will be able to make a 20 difference. 21 22 Johnson thanked Charmane Domino for her ten years of excellent service, noting that 23 she was unable to attend tonight. 24 25 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 26 passed unanimously. 27 28 VI. COMMENTS (7:10 p.m.) 29 30 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 31 There were none. 32 33 B. Park Commission 34 Scherer reported that the June meeting for the Commission has been canceled. He 35 advised that the scoreboard was installed at Hamel Legion Park. He provided a brief 36 update on the Fields of Medina Park and the Arrowhead Trail project. He noted that 37 there have been some suggestions for Walnut and Maple Parks and advised that he 38 recommended that the residents bring their suggestions to the next Park Commission 39 meeting. 40 41 C. Planning Commission 42 Planning Commissioner White reported that the Planning Commission met the previous 43 week to consider a PUD Concept Plan from the Excelsior Group, noting that the 44 Commission felt that the plan did not meet the objectives for a PUD. She noted that the 45 draft Comprehensive Plan has the land marked as rural residential, which will be a 46 change from the current low density residential guiding. She stated that the Commission 47 considered requests from Just for Kix and recommended approval of the requests, 48 noting that the Commission felt that a little more modulation was needed on three sides 49 of the proposed building. 50 51 VII. PRESENTATIONS Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 June 21, 2016 1 2 A. Call for Sale of Bonds — Refunding of 2008A G.O. Bonds — Stacie Kvilvang, 3 Ehlers (7:13 p.m.) 4 Johnson noted that there is an opportunity to refinance the 2008A G.O. Bonds the City 5 currently has from the Uptown Hamel project. 6 7 Stacie Kvilvang stated that this would be an advance refunding, which means that the 8 City is completing this more than 90 days before the call date. She noted that the bond 9 term would not be changing, but about $66,000 would be saved over the course of the 10 bond term because of the anticipated lower interest rate. 11 12 Anderson asked which fund the savings would be applied to. 13 14 Barnhart replied that the savings would be applied to the TIF District. 15 16 1. Resolution No. 2016-52 Providing for Sale of $1,280,000 General 17 Obligation Refunding Bonds; Series 2016A 18 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-52 Providing 19 for the Sale of $1,280,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds; Series 2016A. Motion 20 passed unanimously. 21 22 Mitchell commented that this is excellent work by staff and Ehlers. 23 24 VIII. OLD BUSINESS 25 26 A. Deerhill Preserve (formerly Stonegate) CD-PUD Final Plat; Right -of -Way 27 Vacation; Deerhill Road Public Improvement Project (7:15 p.m.) 28 Mitchell recused himself from this item. 29 30 Pederson took over as Acting Mayor. 31 32 Finke noted that this project has been discussed numerous times over the past year, 33 noting that Preliminary Plat approval was granted in October 2015. He noted that the 34 Final Plat was reviewed and the hearing for the vacation of right-of-way was completed 35 by the Council on April 5th. He noted that the storm sewer hearing was held on May 17th. 36 He stated that the applicant has requested a reduction in park dedication in recognition 37 of the permanent protection of the conservation area, noting that flexibility is allowed 38 under a CD-PUD. He noted that the Preliminary Plat required deeding of Outlot A, 39 granting trail easements throughout the conservation area, and a fee of $178,636.42. 40 He stated that the land proposed for dedication plus $102,000, suggested by the 41 applicant, would equate to approximately 65 percent of the total dedication required. 42 43 Pederson asked if the reduction was talked about previously or whether it was just 44 brought up at this point. 45 46 Finke stated that the applicant has brought this request forward to staff and the Park 47 Commission. 48 49 Batty stated that the Council has not discussed that reduction until tonight, noting that 50 this is the first time that the Council has been asked for less than what was specified in 51 the Preliminary Plat. He stated that this is a complicated project with ongoing Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 June 21, 2016 1 discussion, noting that this item has been a sticking point. He stated that at the time of 2 Preliminary Plat approval the applicant stated that they would exercise their rights to 3 appeal the dedication. He noted that he felt it was important to bring closure to this 4 project and therefore there was discussion among staff. He stated that if there was 5 going to be a compromise in the park dedication that should be done in a manner that 6 would not set precedent in the City. He explained that because this is a CD-PUD there 7 is additional flexibility allowed. He noted that the City would still receive the trails and 8 Outlot A in addition to the cash proposed and felt comfortable with that negotiation under 9 the CD-PUD. He stated that if this issue is not resolved the developer has reserved their 10 right to contest which would cost the developer and the City additional funds. He did not 11 believe it would be useful to spend additional funds on lawyers for this project. He 12 commented that there has been great progress in the relationship between the City and 13 developer and believed that should continue as this is a multi -phase project. 14 15 Pederson stated that his understanding that the Preliminary Plat must stay the same as 16 the Final Plat and was concerned that would be changing. 17 18 Batty stated that the terminology is a bit misleading, noting that although the conditions 19 are set at Preliminary Plat the parties can mutually agree to change items. 20 21 1. Resolution No. 2016-53 Granting Final Plat Approval for Deerhill 22 Preserve 23 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-53 Granting 24 Final Plat Approval for Deerhill Preserve, changing condition ten to reflect $120,000. 25 Motion passed unanimously. 26 27 2. Conservation Design — Planned Unit Development Agreement by 28 and between the City of Medina and Property Resources 29 Development Corporation for Deerhill Preserve 30 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Conservation Design Planned 31 Unit Development Agreement by and between the City of Medina and Property 32 Resources Development Corporation for Deerhill Preserve. Motion passed 33 unanimously. 34 35 3. Resolution No. 2016-54 Vacating a Portion of the Deerhill Road 36 Right -of -Way Approximately One -Half Mile West of Willow Drive 37 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-54 Vacating a 38 Portion of the Deerhill Road right-of-way approximately one-half mile west of Willow 39 Drive. Motion passed unanimously. 40 41 4. Ordinance No. 599 Establishing the Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer 42 Improvement Tax District 43 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Ordinance No. 599 Establishing the 44 Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District. Motion passed 45 unanimously. 46 47 5. Resolution No. 2016-55 Authorizing Publication of Ordinance No. 48 599 by Title and Summary 49 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-55 Authorizing 50 the Publication of the Deerhill Preserve Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District 51 Ordinance by Title and Summary. Motion passed unanimously. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 June 21, 2016 1 2 6. Resolution No. 2016-56 Regarding the 2015 Deerhill Road Extension 3 Project; Accepting the Feasibility Report, Ordering the Improvement 4 Project, Approving the Plans and Specifications, and Authorizing 5 Advertisement for Bids 6 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the Resolution No. 2016-56 7 Regarding the 2016 Deerhill Road Extension Public Improvement Project. Motion 8 passed unanimously. 9 10 Mitchell rejoined the Council. 11 12 IX. NEW BUSINESS 13 14 A. Excelsior Group LLC — PUD Concept Plan Review — 2120 and 2212 15 Chippewa Road (7:30 p.m.) 16 Martin recused herself from this discussion. 17 18 Finke noted that the Council will only be asked to provide comments on the Concept 19 Plan at this time. He stated that the subject site is 37 acres in size with approximately 20 31 of those acres buildable. He stated that the land is included in the 2021 staging area, 21 with the ability to jump ahead two years which would be 2019. He stated that these 22 properties could have previously been developed in 2016 but advised that the City 23 amending the staging plan previously to delay development because of the decreased 24 density for the City within the system statements from the Metropolitan Council. He 25 identified the parcels and the surrounding property uses. He noted that access is 26 proposed from Chippewa Road with a park proposed in the center of the project. He 27 advised that there were roads stubbed to neighboring properties to the north, but 28 explained that alignment may need to be changed as the neighboring properties are 29 guided for rural residential under the draft Comprehensive Plan. He advised that the 30 draft Comprehensive Plan is expected to be in place prior to the time this property would 31 be allowed to develop and therefore the Concept Plan should be considered under the 32 draft Plan. He stated that if the Council supports the concept it would be possible to 33 amend the draft Comprehensive Plan. He described the proposed site layout of 87 34 small single family lots, noting that the proposed plan would have a density of 2.8 units 35 an acre compared to the two lots per acre allowed under low density residential. He 36 described some transportation issues that would be impacted by this concept. He stated 37 that the Planning Commission was not supportive of this concept and suggested that if a 38 formal application were to move forward the applicant should have larger lots. 39 40 Ben Schmidt, Excelsior Group, stated that they did hear the comments of the Planning 41 Commission in regard to larger lots and stated that they are not opposed to that and 42 would be willing to consider that. He stated that the unit mix was proposed because of 43 the neighboring Wealshire use and the lack of that product type in Medina. He stated 44 that they were aware that the project had been pushed back in the staging plan and 45 believed that this plan would meet the criteria necessary to jump ahead in the staging 46 plan. He stated that they believe that it would make sense for this property to develop 47 sooner rather than later. He noted that one of the main criteria in the staging plan was 48 whether the project could be served by existing infrastructure and stated that as far as 49 they know the property can be served by the existing infrastructure. He stated that 50 almost all the wetland would be preserved. He stated that they believed this project 51 would work well with the Wealshire property and the neighboring employment centers. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 June 21, 2016 1 He stated that they would entertain changes to the Concept Plan and would like to know 2 if the Council is willing to consider development on that site or whether the development 3 is going to be pushed back. 4 5 Mitchell asked about the minimum lot size, width and depth for rural residential. 6 7 Finke provided those calculations. 8 9 Pederson stated that he attended the Planning Commission meeting and commented 10 that in his opinion the road system is adequate. He stated that he did not think it would 11 make a difference whether the City builds out Chippewa to the east. He stated that he 12 would like to see larger lot sizes and a larger park in the center. He stated that the big 13 question would be the staging as the property is currently going to be guided from low 14 density to rural residential in the draft Comprehensive Plan. 15 16 Anderson stated that Pederson made some great points, agreeing that the lot size is too 17 small. He was unsure that the PUD criteria are met. He stated that he would like to 18 protect the work the Steering Committee has done but also acknowledges that the 19 property is currently zoned low density. 20 21 Cousineau stated that 18 months ago the City slowed down the development through 22 the staging plan and she cannot ignore that fact. She stated that in her opinion this is 23 then a when question rather than a yes or no. She stated that in her mind she would 24 consider this application under the current Comprehensive Plan as the draft is just a 25 draft. 26 27 Batty agreed that the current Comprehensive Plan is the guiding document at this time 28 but agreed with the logic of staff. He stated that the broad question would be whether 29 the City is ready for this to be developed or whether the development should continue to 30 be pushed back. 31 32 Mitchell stated that the Wealshire property was approved for development without 33 perhaps considering the development timing for the neighboring properties. He stated 34 that perhaps it would make sense for something less than rural residential to be next to 35 Wealshire. 36 37 Pederson stated that at the Planning Commission meeting the neighbors to the north of 38 the project were not happy that they would not be allowed to develop in anything outside 39 of R-1. He stated that the people in the northern part of the City believe that the 40 development has been focused in the north but noted that is because the sewer pipes 41 began in that area. 42 43 Bruce Workman stated that he has lived in this City for 30 years and worked on the 1990 44 Comprehensive Plan when he was on the Planning Commission. He stated that since 45 that time he has watched the property go in and out of development. He noted that they 46 were planning on developing the property in 2016 but then the staging plan was 47 changed and a commercial site, Wealshire, was allowed to develop. He stated that in 48 his opinion it is time to allow this property to develop and the property around this 49 property to the north. He stated that if the City can get what it wants and the developer 50 is satisfied then now is the time to develop or these properties would be developed into 51 five acre lots. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 June 21, 2016 1 2 Anderson stated that he is cold on the project because it moves the staging process too 3 far forward. 4 5 Cousineau agreed with Anderson and that is her opinion as well, not today but perhaps 6 in 2019. 7 8 Pederson stated that Mr. Workman is correct that this has been a long time coming. He 9 stated that he drives the road every day and does not see a major problem with the 10 project. 11 12 Cousineau stated that if this property remains as low density in the draft Comprehensive 13 Plan, then perhaps another site is changed to rural residential in order to balance that 14 out. 15 16 Anderson noted the comment and stated that he would pass that onto the Steering 17 Committee. 18 19 Mitchell stated that this would push development further west which is desirable but 20 acknowledged the timing issue because of the staging plan. He noted that he was not 21 thrilled with the small lot size and would recommend meeting the low density zoning 22 requirements. He stated that in his opinion Wealshire changed things for that area. 23 24 Pederson agreed that the Wealshire project did change things for that area. 25 26 Martin rejoined the Council. 27 28 B. LeJune — Lot Line Rearrangement — 2782 and 2820 County Road 24 (7:57 29 p.m.) 30 Finke stated that the proposal would combine and rearrange lot lines, which would 31 improve conformance with different City regulations. He stated that staff recommends 32 replacement easements along new property lines and that the applicant considers 33 requesting vacation of the old easements along the lot lines. He stated that the 34 applicant has interest in making that request but would like to move this ahead in order 35 to move forward a closing on one of the properties. He provided an aerial photograph 36 identifying the newly proposed lot lines. He stated staff recommends approval of the 37 request. 38 39 Martin asked if the applicant would agree to a front yard setback, larger than 50 feet, 40 from County Road 24 in order to preserve the view shed. 41 42 Finke stated that there is no construction proposed at this time. 43 44 Martin stated that perhaps a condition could be included to require an enhanced 45 setback. 46 47 Batty stated that at this point he did not see a connection between the land use activity 48 the Council is being asked to consider and requiring an increased setback. He noted 49 that the applicant could voluntarily agree to the condition. 50 51 Mitchell stated that 99 people out of 100 develop their property very nicely. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 June 21, 2016 1 2 Mike Steadman, realtor representing the applicant, stated that they agree with the 3 recommendations of staff as this would be an improvement to clean up the lot lines. He 4 stated that they would not agree to any setback changes at this time as they are working 5 hard for the LeJunes to move ahead with a closing on the property. 6 7 1. Resolution No. 2016-57 Approving a Lot Line Rearrangement 8 between 2782 and 2820 County Road 24 9 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to adopt Resolution No. 2016-57 Approving a 10 Lot Line Rearrangement between 2782 and 2820 County Road 24. Motion passed 11 unanimously. 12 13 C. Jeffrey -Johnson Easement Vacation — Public Hearing (8:08 p.m.) 14 Johnson stated that staff is asking the Council to open the public hearing and continue 15 the hearing as the applicants are still negotiating their agreement. He noted that the 16 item would be continued to the July 5th meeting. 17 18 Mitchell opened the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. 19 20 No comments made. 21 22 Moved by Martin, seconded by Cousineau, to continue the public hearing related to the 23 vacation of drainage and utility easements on 2605 Willow Drive to the July 5, 2016 City 24 Council meeting. Motion passed unanimously. 25 26 X. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:10 p.m.) 27 Johnson stated that the lower level project stalled this past week. A plumbing permit is 28 needed for the project to proceed. Activity is expected to resume the week of July 4th. 29 He noted that the contractor will begin building walls this week. 30 31 XI. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:11 p.m.) 32 Cousineau stated that she attended the League of Minnesota Cities conference, noting 33 that the conference was partnered with the Alliance for Innovation and therefore not all 34 aspects applied directly to Medina. She stated that she was reassured by some of the 35 things Medina is doing such as organized waste removal. She believed that technology 36 and social media would be a great focus for the future. She stated that the City has an 37 amazing staff to collaborate with and commended staff for their efforts. 38 39 Mitchell stated that he would want to ensure that Charmane Domino receives her 40 photograph in the paper and is recognized formally for her 10 years of service. 41 42 Martin stated that perhaps 15 minutes of a workshop should be devoted to technology, 43 specifically to review the City's website and Facebook page. 44 45 Cousineau noted that another city commented that they use social media to 46 communicate with their younger population. 47 48 Johnson agreed that technology should be discussed at a future workshop. 49 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8 June 21, 2016 1 Martin stated that she attended the antique festival the previous weekend in Uptown 2 Hamel and found it to be wonderful. She stated that she would like to see more of that 3 kind of activity as it can bring additional sales to the other businesses in the City as well. 4 5 XII. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:17 p.m.) 6 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to approve the bills, EFT 003693E-003710E 7 for $48,816.33, order check numbers 44441-44493 for $128,843.65, and payroll EFT 8 507223-507249 for $47,700.71. Motion passed unanimously. 9 10 XIII. ADJOURN 11 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to adjourn the meeting at 8:17 p.m. Motion 12 passed unanimously. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Bob Mitchell, Mayor 22 Attest: 23 24 25 Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 9 June 21, 2016 4 7..T INC. V C� From: Tom MULTIPLE CONCEPTS INTERIORS Affirmative Action Plan/Equal Opportunity Employer 26 First Avenue North - Waite Park, MN 56387 Ph. (320) 253-5078 Fx. (320) 253-9458 Ba11 - Project Manager 612-801-5494 Email: tball@mcicarpetone.com Proposal Submitted To City of Medina- Scott Johnson Email Date 5/27/16 Street Job Name Upper Level Carpet Remodel City, State, Zip Code Job Location Medina, MN City Hall Architect Date of Plans Emailed Addendum(s): We Propose: Provide and install Bolyu Relay All bids include: Take-up and disposal 4.5" carpet base or vinyl base. All bids exclude: Furniture moving, hours Notes: Proposal includes minor floor prep Additional floor prep will be billed Proposal does not include removal and flatness. Hereby to furnish materials in color of your choice. This of existing broadloom major floor repair if existing only (ie Skimming small and labor complete per specification as outlined below. is the same style that is on your stairs: $7,936.00 carpet and vinyl or carpet base and installation of new 4" or floor or fill that comes up during removal, overtime and night holes and small cracks). hour, plus all costs of materials required. or adhesives. Substrate must meet specs for smoothness at $ 85.00 per of existing floor materials We propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above specifications for the sum Seven Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-six and no/100s dollars $7,936.00 of: MCI per standard practices. Any charge over and above the estimate. All workers are fully covered by Workmen's legal action shall be entitled to recover by us if not accepted PAYMENT TERMS: Net 30 days of invoice date using cash, check, or credit will be the responsibility of the buyer. A monthly service charge will be added at the We reserve the right to perfect mechanics lien rights when applicable. All materials is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a substantial alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner Compensation Insurance. If either party commences legal action to enforce its rights its reasonable attomey's fees and costs of litigation relating to said legal action, as Authorized Signature card. Any collection fees or attorneys fees incurred by rate of 1.5% per month (18% annum) workmanlike manner according to specifications submitted, only upon written orders, and will become an extra to carry fire, tomado and other necessary insurance. Our pursuant to this aggreement, the prevailing party in said determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. NOTE: this proposal may be withdrawn within 60 days. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL: The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Signature Date of Acceptance cooo Inc. Name / Address CITY OF MEDINA 2052 COUNTY ROAD 24 MEDINA, MN 55340 15410 9th Ave. N. Plymouth, MN 55447 76:3-476-4962 office 612-867-8694 cell Description Estimate Date 6/7/2016 Install at UPPER LEVEL OFFICE AREAS 2052 COUNTY ROAD 24 MEDINA, MN 55340 Rate 2160 SQ/FT. CARPET; RELAY, EMBER GLOW. INSTALLED DIRECT GLUE DOWN 350 FT. CARPET BASE; CUT, BOUND, .AND INSTALLED TAKE UP GLUE DOWN CARPET & DISPOSAL *FURNITURE MOVING BY THE CITY OF MEDINA 50% DOWN BALANCE DUE ON COMPLETION 2.86 1.65 1,120.00 Total 6,280.56 577.50 1,120.00 J Total $7,978.06 J Snow and Sun Painting 2500 New Brighton Blvd., STE 203 MPLS, MN 55418 Name / Address Medina City Hall 2052 County Rd. 24 Medina, MN 55430 Estimate Date Estimate # 5/31/2016 2 Project Description Qty Rate Total Paint 2nd floor of the city Hall wall, doors and windows trims 1 4,200.00 4,200.00 Total $4,200.00 tegret7 formerly CARLSON BUILDING SERVICES NAME / ADDRESS City of Medina Attn: Accounts Payable 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 ESTIMATE DATE 6/17/2016 ESTIMATE NO. 26312 Ship To City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 DESCRIPTION QTY COST TOTAL Painting - Prep paint two coats upstairs at City Hall (excludes the lobby, men's & women's restrooms and the conference room per Scott Johnson) Painting - Paint ten doors (excludes jambs) Painting - Paint Eight (8) double crank out awning window extension jambs and casings Wall paint to be Sherwin Williams SherScrub Egg Shell Window and door paint to be Sherwin Williams Pro Industrial ***Price subject to change if not accepted within 45 days. 4,622.00 4,622.00 1,160.00 1,160.00 1,856.00 1,856.00 TOTAL S7,638.00 4111 Mackenzie Court NE, Suite 100, St. Michael, MN 55376 (763) 497-8020 Fax (763) 497-8564 www.tegrete.com RES Specialty Pyrotechnics MAGIC IN THE AIR Monday, June 26, 2016 Jodi Gallup City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Dear Jodi: We would be delighted to design another fireworks program for the City of Medina on Saturday, September 17, 2016. Our proposal indicates size, shell effect, and quantity of shells. The shells listed in our proposal will be used to design the following segments: Opening Barrage, Main Show Body, Select Patriotic Shell, Signature Pattern Shell, Multiple Effects Barrage Cake, and Grand Finale. Our show design uses piled, stacked and multi -break shells. Our displays are electronically fired for added safety. Our customer service and communication principles are based on personal relationships. We listen to your needs and expectations. We then implement them into your program, resulting in a unique one -of -a -kind show. Our displays are a turnkey operation and are coordinated with your event. The entire show is electronically fired for added safety. Our proposal includes all materials, equipment, certified display operators, necessary permits, and $5,000,000.00 liability insurance. The total cost will be $4,000.00. In closing, let me state that I can personally guarantee you a show with a finale so intense that you will forget to breathe. Please feel free to contact me should you have any additional questions. Please feel free to contact me should you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Adam Guthrie Account Manager RES Specialty Pyrotechnics, Inc. 21595 286th Street ■ Belle Plaine, MN 56011 ■ Phone: 952.873.3113 ■ Fax: 952.873.2859 RES Specialty Pyrotechnics MAGIC IN THE AIR DISPLAY CONTRACT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 26th day of June, 2016 between RES Specialty Pyrotechnics, Inc. hereafter referred to as the SELLER and City of Medina, hereafter referred to as the BUYER. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BETWEEN THE SELLER AND THE BUYER AS FOLLOWS: Service Provided Date(s) Time Duration Location Event Sponsor OBLIGATIONS OF SELLER: Outdoor Fireworks Display Saturday, September 17, 2016 8:00 PM (approximately) 16-18 minutes (depending on intensity) Hamel Community Building; Medina, MN City of Medina SELLER shall provide all materials, equipment and personnel necessary to perform the above -mentioned display. SELLER is required and will comply with NFPA 1123, Code for Outdoor Display of Fireworks, 2010 edition and NFPA 1126, Pyrotechnics before a Proximate Audience, 2006 edition. SELLER shall provide show liability insurance in the amount of $5,000,000.00 to cover the fireworks display and cleanup. SELLER shall include the BUYER, as co-insured on Certificate of Insurance. OBLIGATIONS OF BUYER: BUYER shall provide a suitable location for firing of the fireworks display. BUYER shall provide and cover all costs for security, safety and cleanup at the display site. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The terms of this agreement shall begin on the day of the signing of this agreement and shall conclude upon the completion of the display. This agreement shall run no longer than one (1) calendar year. However, if before the date of the scheduled performance, the BUYER has not performed fully its obligations under the terms of this agreement or that the financial credit of the BUYER has been impaired, the SELLER may cancel this agreement at any time. In the event the BUYER does not perform fully all of its obligations herein, the SELLER shall have the option to perform or refuse to perform hereunder, and in either event the BUYER shall be liable to the SELLER for any damages, compensation or costs incurred including but not limited to attorney and court fees in addition to the compensation herein. The SELLER shall retain the right to stop or interrupt the display at any time if, in the opinion of the SELLER, conditions have become unsafe. In event of rain, fireworks may be rescheduled at a mutually agreeable date. 21595 286th Street ■ Belle Plaine, MN 56011 ■ Phone: 952.873.3113 ■ Fax: 952.873.2859 Contracted amount: $4,000.00 inclusive of sales tax, if applicable. Contracted amount includes fire watch and permit fee. All payments shall be paid by BUYER to and in the name of RES Specialty Pyrotechnics, Inc. in the form of a company check, certified bank check, money order, or cash. CANCELLATION: In the event the BUYER cancels this agreement any time during the contract period, the SELLER shall be entitled to and receive 25% of the contracted fee for the remainder of the contract period plus compensation for any pre- and post -production costs incurred. THIS AGREEMENT is the whole agreement of the parties' above named. No representation inducement or agreement has been given by one to the other to enter into this agreement other than expressly set forth herein. This agreement shall not be altered, modified, or amended except in writing by a duly authorized officer of each party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto set their names on the day and year listed below. CONTRACT VALID WHEN SIGNED BY AUTHORIZED PERSONS. BUYER: Title: Signature: Date: SELLER: Adam Guthrie — RES Specialty Pyrotechnics Title: Account Manager Signature: Date: 6/26/2016 21595 286th Street ■ Belle Plaine, MN 56011 ■ Phone: 952.873.3113 ■ Fax: 952.873.2859 MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: City Administrator Scott Johnson and City Council FROM: Chief Ed Belland DATE: June 24, 2016 RE: Resignation of CSO Brandon Wenande Agenda Item # 5D p:763-473-9209 f:763-473.8858 non -emergency: 763 -5 25 -6210 Emergency 9-1-1 On June 22, 2016, I was notified by Community Service Officer (CSO) Brandon Wenande that he has accepted a full-time deputy sheriff's position with the Wright County Sheriff's Office. Brandon will start with Wright County on July 18th, 2016. Brandon has done an excellent job for our department. He has been here just over two years. In those two years, he has taken our Bike Rodeo and moved it to the next level, and has been very successful in all the community events. He took on the computer updates for our squads and has been very effective working on nuisance complaints throughout the city bringing different properties into compliance as complaints have come in. He is a great team player on our department and he will be missed. I would ask the Medina City Council to accept Brandon Wenande's resignation and give me permission to move forward with the hiring of his replacement. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER BRANDON WENANDE WHEREAS, Brandon Wenande is currently employed as a Community Service Officer by the city of Medina; and WHEREAS, on June 24, 2016, Brandon Wenande submitted a letter of resignation from his position addressed to the Police Chief; and WHEREAS, Brandon Wenande's resignation from his position shall become effective on July 15, 2016. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that Brandon Wenande's letter of resignation is hereby accepted with gratitude for a job well done. Dated: July 5, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016- July 5, 2016 Chief Edgar Belland Medina Police Department 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina, MN 55340 June 24, 2016 Dear Chief Belland, Please accept this letter as my formal notice of resignation from the Medina Police Department as a Community Service Officer. My last day of employment will be July 15, 2016. Thank you for the opportunity to work for such an outstanding organization. J Brandon Wenande Agenda Item # 5E PART-TIME COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER JOB ANNOUNCEMENT The Medina Police Department is seeking a qualified individual for the position of Community Service Officer. Applicants must be 18 years of age, or older, community oriented, certified in first responder training, possess a valid driver's license, and currently enrolled in an accredited law enforcement program. Hourly rate is $14/hr. The position is classified as part-time temporary and will work 20-24 hours per week with flexibility on work hours. A City application packet may be obtained at Medina City Hall, County Road 24, Medina, MN 55340, or on the City's website at www.medinamn.us, or by calling (763) 473-8850. Application materials to be submitted to Jodi Gallup at Medina City Hall; application packets must be received at City Hall no later than 4:30 p.m. on August 8, 2016. C CenterPoint® Energy May 10, 2016 Kevin Boecker City of Medina 2052 Hennepin Co Rd 24 Medina, MN 55340 505 Nicollet Mall PO Box 59038 Minneapolis, MN 55459-0038 Dear Mr. Boecker: Thank you for submitting an application for a CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant. I am pleased to inform you that a grant in the amount of $1560 has been awarded to the City of Medina for radar indicator sign. We would appreciate the opportunity to present the Community Partnership Grant check at a council meeting in June, July or August. Please provide the following information via fax to Community Relations at 612-321-4812 or return via email to: beth.brown@centerpointenergy.com June, July and August Council meetings: Dates: Time: Location: Name of contact and phone number to schedule attendance: We will coordinate with a CenterPoint Energy representative to attend and present the Community Partnership Grant check. Congratulations and thank you for making safety a top priority in your community. Sincerely, Jean Krause Director, Community Relations Agenda Item # 8A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 29, 2016 MEETING: July 5, 2016 City Council SUBJ: Just for Kix — Site Plan Review, Hardcover Variance, Lot Combination 45 Highway 55 — Public Hearing Review Deadline Complete Application Received: April 18, 2016 Review Deadline (120 days): August 16, 2016 Summary of Request Clough Properties, LLC has requested approvals to construct an 18,040 square foot commercial building at property currently addressed as 45 Highway 55. The applicant intends to operate their dance studio, Just for Kix, in the structure along with a small related retail operation. The subject site is located on the eastern City border, south of Highway 55 and north of the railroad right-of-way. The property currently includes a single family home. Elm Creek flows through the northwest corner of the property before flowing under Highway 55. There are a number of trees along the bank of Elm Creek and also trees to the east of the home. Much of the property is vacant. An aerial of the site can be found to the right. The subject site is zoned Commercial Highway - Railroad (CH -RR), the same as the property to the west of Sioux Drive. The City rezoned the property from Uptown Hame1-2 to CH -RR in 2015 at the request of the property owner. In addition, earlier in the year, the City recently annexed an approximately 1/2 acre portion of the property from the City of Plymouth. Just for Kix Site Plan Review The applicant has requested the following land use applications in order to allow for the proposed redevelopment of the site. 1) Plat to combine the property which was annexed by the City 2) Variance — the applicant requests a variance to exceed the maximum of 25% impervious surface permitted in the Shoreland Overlay district of Elm Creek. 3) Site Plan Review for construction of a new commercial building. Although this staff report will generally describe the site plan review first for the sake of context, staff recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council consider the plat first, then the variance, since the site plan review would be contingent upon the plat and variance. Site Plan Review Section 825.55 requires Site Plan Review approval prior to issuance of permits for new commercial developments to determine whether it is consistent with relevant requirements. Proposed Use Dance studios and retail uses are listed as permitted uses in the CH -RR zoning district. Setbacks/Lot Dimensions Following is a summary of the proposed construction compared to the requirements of the CH -RR zoning district and shoreland overlav district: CH -RR Requirement Proposed Minimum Lot Area 1 acre 2.19 acre Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 498 feet Minimum Lot Depth 120 feet 540 feet Minimum Front Yard Setback 25 feet 50 feet Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback 15 feet 25 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 25 feet 76 feet Street Setback (arterial) 50 feet 50 feet Railroad Setback Zero, except as necessary for safety, fire access, or utilities 76 feet (building) 3 feet (parking) Setback from Residential 50 feet 280 feet Minimum Parking Setbacks Front Yard Rear/Interior Side Yards Residential 25 feet 10 feet 40 feet 27 feet 32 feet 255 feet Maximum Impervious Surface 25% (Shoreland Overlay) 50% Wetlands/Floodplain/Shoreland Elm Creek flows through the northwest corner of the subject property. There are wetlands adjacent to the creek that will require upland buffers with an average width of 30 feet. These required buffers are all within the required 50-foot Elm Creek buffer. A smaller, 2520 square foot wetland is also located in the west central of the property. The applicant proposes to fill this wetland in order to construct the building. The applicant proposes to purchase wetland credits in order to mitigate the impact. This wetland currently provides Just for Kix Page 2 of 10 July 5, 2016 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting storage for surface drainage from the surrounding area before it drains into Elm Creek. Staff was originally concerned that filling this wetland area would channelize the drainage to Elm Creek because of the loss of storage capacity from the wetland. The applicant has updated plans to incorporate BMPs to slow this drainage before the creek. The wetland impacts would be subject to Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) review. There is a floodplain adjacent to Elm Creek with a 1% (100-year) regulatory elevation of 961.5 on the western property line and 960.8 on the east. There is also a 0.2% ("500-year") floodplain of 962. No construction or grading is proposed that will affect the regulatory floodplain. The Shoreland Overlay District requires the following standards for property within 300 feet of streams: • 50 foot structure and parking setback: The structure is setback 55 feet from the stream and parking is proposed to be setback 183 feet. • 25% impervious surface maximum. The applicant has requested a variance to allow up to 50% of the site to contain impervious surfaces. This will be discussed more in-depth later in the report. • Lowest level of the building shall be three feet above the ordinary high water level. The proposed structure is over 10 feet above the high water level. • "Shoreland Alteration - Alteration of vegetation or topography shall be regulated to prevent soil erosion, preserve shoreland aesthetics, preserve historic sites, prevent bank slumping, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. Vegetation alteration necessary for the construction of structures and individual sewage treatment systems or for the construction of roads and parking areas shall be exempt from the vegetation alteration standards of this subdivision. Removal or alteration of vegetation, except for agricultural and forest management uses, is allowed, subject to the following standards: o Intensive vegetation clearing within the shore impact zone shall not allowed. o In the shore impact zone, limited clearing of trees and shrubs and cutting, pruning, and trimming of trees shall be allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling and to accommodate the placement of permitted accessory structures or facilities, provided that: (1) the screening of structures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions, is not substantially reduced; (2) along tributary streams, existing shading of water surfaces is preserved; and (3) the above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs, or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards." The applicant proposes no alteration of vegetation within the shore impact zone. Stormwater/LID The applicant proposes two pretreatment basins and two filtration basins in order to meet the City and Elm Creek Watershed standards. The design has been reviewed by both engineers and appear to generally meet the standards. The applicant proposes water quality improvements which exceed minimum City standards. This additional treatment has been provided in an attempt to mitigate the requested variance for Just for Kix Site Plan Review Page 3 of 10 July 5, 2016 City Council Meeting additional hardcover in shoreland overlay district, which was a suggestion made by staff in this instance and in similar variances in the past. Building Materials The applicant proposes primarily precast concrete exterior building materials. The proposed building is approximately 50% concrete, 20% brick, 20% glass, and 10% exterior insulated finish systems (EIFS). Commercial districts require a minimum of 30% of the exterior materials to be brick, stone, stucco, or glass. The code allows a maximum of 20% to be wood, metal, or hardiboard siding and a maximum of 70% "decorative concrete...color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and...patterned to create a high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance." Material samples are available for review to determine whether the proposed precast concrete has a sufficiently high quality finish and pattern. Building Modulation/Fenestration/Multi-sided Architecture Commercial districts require that "buildings shall be modulated a minimum of once per 40 feet of building perimeter to avoid long, monotonous building walls. This modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building materials/design." The proposed structure has a footprint of 186'x106'. This would require the building to be modulated 5 times along the long facades and 3 along the shorter facades. The Planning Commission had requested additional modulation and the applicant added vertical modulation on the north and south elevations in the center of the building. The northern and western facades appear to still be short of the modulation requirement. The applicant notes that the vertical brick elements do bump out slightly, which provides some additional modulation. Commercial districts require that "building elevations which face a public street shall include generous window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when windows are not practical." The proposed northern fa9ade includes approximately 20% of the facade area as glass, or 31 % of the linear frontage. Commercial districts require that "any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street, an interior access drive for the development, or a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality generally associated with a front fagade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible with the front building elevation." In this case, only the northern fa9ade faces a public street. The northern fagade is fairly similar to the southern facade, with the exception of the canopy over the main entrance. The Planning Commission and Council can discuss whether the modulation, fenestration, and multi -sided architecture are sufficient. Tree Preservation/Landscaping The applicant proposes to remove 11 trees around the existing home on the property. The applicant does not propose to remove any of the trees adjacent to Elm Creek. Just for Kix Site Plan Review Page 4 of 10 July 5, 2016 City Council Meeting The tree preservation ordinance would allow 15% of the trees on the site to be removed for "initial site development" and an additional 15% for remaining site development. There are 28 existing trees on the property, which would permit 4 trees to be removed for initial development and 4 for other activities. This results in 24 inches of required tree replacement. Landscaping requirements are based upon the lot perimeter, including: 1) 1 overstory tree per 50 feet of perimeter 2) 1 ornamental tree per 100 feet of perimeter 3) 1 shrub per 30 feet of perimeter The subject site is approximately 1500 feet in perimeter, requiring 30 overstory trees, 15 ornamental trees, and 50 shrubs. The landscaping plan appears to meet the replacement and landscaping requirement. The applicant has utilized larger plantings in order to meet the minimum planting requirements because of limited space to accommodate the trees. Commercial district standards require landscaping to occupy a minimum of 8% of the parking lot and loading dock area. Staff calculates that 10.3% of the proposed parking lot area is landscaping. Transportation The applicant proposes to access the site through a shared driveway with Aldi to the west, which connects with Sioux Drive. The applicant proposes to close the existing access to Highway 55, which is consistent with Minnesota Department of Transportation policies. The City anticipated the subject site accessing Sioux Drive during the discussions with Aldi. These projects, along with development west of Sioux Drive, led the City Engineer to recommend construction of turn lanes on Sioux Drive at Westfalen Trail. The City contracted for the project this summer with the intention that new commercial uses east and west of Sioux Drive pay for the full cost of the project. Staff recommends that the applicant enter into an agreement with the City related to the payment of assessments on the project. The Fire Marshal and Fire Chief had raised concerns related to fire truck circulation on the site because of the single access point. They recommend maintaining an emergency vehicle access to Highway 55 in order to provide adequate circulation. Staff has had discussions with MnDOT and it appears that they are supportive because this will help with the full access closure. Now that the turn lanes have been constructed on Sioux Drive, the City Engineer has not raised concerns related to the impact of the development on the transportation system. A sidewalk crosses much of the property to the west to Sioux Drive, although does not connect all of the way to the subject property. The applicant proposes to stub a sidewalk to the western property line. Off -Street Parking The City would require a minimum of 73 parking spaces (1 per 250 gross square feet of dance studio and retail space). The applicant proposes 73 parking stalls. Just for Kix Site Plan Review Page 5 of 10 July 5, 2016 City Council Meeting Sewer/Water An existing City of Plymouth sewer main travels along the south and west of the property to the Met Council lift station west of Sioux Drive. The applicant proposes to connect to this sewer line. The City of Medina does not have a sewer line in the area which could serve the lot without a lift pump. Staff recommends a condition that an agreement with Plymouth be in place prior to construction. Aldi stubbed a water main to the western lot line, which the applicant proposes to loop along their western property line to connect to the existing water service which served the home. The City Engineer and Fire Marshal have also provided technical comments which the applicant should be required to address. Loading Dock No loading docks are proposed. The retail space is fairly small and deliveries will be made from the parking lot during non -peak times. Utilities/Mechanical Equipment/Trash and Recycling Commercial districts require that utilities be located under ground and that transformers be screened. The applicant proposes to relocate existing electrical lines underground, with a transformer in the southwest corner of the site. The applicant has shown landscaping around the transformer. Commercial districts require "equipment shall be screened through the use of architectural elements and materials which are compatible with the overall design of the building." The applicant proposes similar rooftop screening as was utilized on the Aldi building. Lot Combination/Plat The applicant proposes to combine the property recently annexed from the City of Plymouth with the main portion of the property. These parcels have been historically under common ownership but bisected by the municipal boundary. As noted in the table on page 2, the proposed combined lot meets the lot standards of the CH -RR zoning district. In addition to ensuring that the proposed lot meets lot standards, the subdivision ordinance also allows the City to require necessary dedications to support the property in question. Infrastructure to serve the lot was discussed throughout the report in connection with the Site Plan Review. Staff recommends that the plat also dedicate easements as recommended by the City Engineer for utilities on the site and as recommended by MnDOT for Highway 55. Review Criteria Staff recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council review the requests in the following order: 1) Lot combination/plat; 2) Hardcover Variance; 3) Site Plan Review. Lot Combination/Plat The subdivision ordinance establishes the following criteria when reviewing requests within the City. Staff has provided potential findings for each of the criterion. Just for Kix Page 6 of 10 July 5, 2016 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. The proposed combination is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and is not premature because it does not affect the infrastructure necessary to serve the area. The combination prevents the small eastern parcel from being smaller than lot standard minimums and removes various shortcomings of the property. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. The proposed combination improves the ability to develop the combined property and does not affect the physical characteristics described above. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. The combination prevents the small eastern parcel from being smaller than lot standard minimums. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. The proposed combination provides more space to provide stormwater improvements. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed combination is not likely to cause public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. The proposed combination will not conflict with streets, easements, or right-of-way. In fact, the combination improves the situation by providing access to the eastern property. Variance According to Subd. 2 of Section 825.45 of the City Code, the City is required to consider the following criteria when reviewing a variance request: "Subd. 2. Criteria for Granting Variances. (a) A variance shall only be granted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. (b) A variance shall only be granted when it is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (c) A variance may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance Economic considerations alone do not constitute a practical difficulty. In order for a practical difficult to be established, all of the following criteria shall be met: (1) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. In determining if the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, the board shall consider, among other factors, whether the variance Just for Kix Site Plan Review Page 7 of 10 July 5, 2016 City Council Meeting requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty and whether the variance confers upon the applicant any special privileges that are denied to the owners of other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district; (2) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and (3) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The applicant argues that the location of a commercial property along Elm Creek and near major intersection in the City is unique and justifies a variance. The City has approved a variance for 50% hardcover on the two commercial sites to the west, but the previous approvals do not create precedent, as each variance is to be reviewed on its own. The proposed commercial use is permitted in the district and even a variance to 50% is significantly below the amount of hardcover which is permitted on other commercial property. Staff believes the development would be similar to the development to the west, thus not altering the essential character of the locality. The applicant is proposing water quality improvements above and beyond minimum City standards in order to mitigate the impact of additional stormwater. If the variance is to be approved, staff would also suggest a condition that the applicant restores the streambank as recommended by Elm Creek watershed as a condition of the hardcover variance. This has also been required in previous variance requests. Site Plan Review The purpose of a Site Plan Review, as described in Section 825.55, is to review proposed construction for consistency with City regulations. Obviously, in this case, the proposed construction exceeds hardcover requirements. If the City Council does not grant approval of the variance, the Site Plan Review cannot be approved. If the Council approves the variance, it appears that other relevant regulations would be met. The City "may condition its approval in any manner it deems reasonably necessary in order to promote public health, safety or welfare, to achieve compliance with this ordinance, or to accomplish the purposes of the district in which the property is located." The City has a high level of discretion when reviewing requests for variances. In fact, a variance should only be granted if the City finds that the criteria have been met. Generally, the City has a low level of discretion when reviewing on site plan applications. If the request is consistent with City regulations, it should be approved. In this case, the site plan does not meet hardcover limitations without a variance. Therefore, if the variance is not granted, the Site Plan Review should not be approved. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission found that the variance criteria had been met based on the findings noted above. The Planning Commission raised concerns about the access to the site from Sioux Drive, especially when a train crosses. Some Commissioners raised an interest in maintaining the existing right-in/right-out onto Highway 55. Staff noted that this did not seem consistent with Just for Kix Site Plan Review Page 8 of 10 July 5, 2016 City Council Meeting statements in the City's transportation plan related to access control. Most traffic from the subject site and Aldi is likely to go north bound out of the entrance. As such, it would be unaffected by a train. A southbound vehicle waiting for a train could cause a back-up in the access drive which would need to wait for the traffic held up by a train to clear. The anticipated volumes are such that this may cause an inconvenience, but not safety concerns. The outbound traffic lane is wide enough that it appears right turning traffic would be able to get by a single vehicle which is queued to turn left. However, a second vehicle would prevent this maneuver. Ultimately, any backups would occur on the private shared drive rather than public streets. The Planning Commission requested additional vertical and/or horizontal modulation. The applicant has updated the plans to include the vertical modulation in the center of the north and south building facades. The City Council can determine if this was adequate. Ultimately, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval with the following conditions. 1) Site Plan Review approval is contingent upon approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan. 2) The Applicant shall construct improvements as displayed on the plans received by the City on 5/25/2016, except as modified herein. 3) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City to ensure compliance with the conditions noted herein as well as other relevant requirements of City ordinance and policy. 4) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit to ensure completion of required site improvements. 5) Site Plan Review is contingent upon approval from MnDOT of an emergency access in order to allow adequate emergency vehicle circulation. 6) The Applicant shall complete any shore restoration recommended by the Elm Creek Watershed to mitigate impacts of additional hardcover. 7) The Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City related to improvements to Sioux Drive which are necessary to support access to the property. 8) The Applicant shall obtain approval and any required agreements in order to connect to the City of Plymouth of sewer line. 9) The Applicant shall meet the recommendations of the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, and City Attorney. 10) The Applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals, including but not limited to Elm Creek Watershed Management Organization, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and other relevant agencies. 11) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the plat, site plan and other relevant documents. Potential Actions In its role at the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, the City Council should hold a public hearing on the variance request. If the City Council finds that the variance criteria have been met and otherwise concur with the Planning Commission recommendation, the following motion would be in order: Move to direct staff to prepare resolutions approving the plat, variance, and site plan review requests for Just for Kix, upon the findings described in the staff report and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Just for Kix Page 9 of 10 July 5, 2016 Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Attachments 1. Document List 2. Excerpt from Draft 6/14/2016 Planning Commission Meeting 3. Engineer Comments dated 6/23/2016 4. Fire Marshal Comments dated 6/29/2016 5. DNR Comments 6. Applicant Narrative 7. Preliminary Plat 8. Final Plat 9. Plans dated 6/29/2016 Just for Kix Site Plan Review Page 10 of 10 July 5, 2016 City Council Meeting Project: LR-16-181 —Just for Kix Plat, Variance, Site Plan Review The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 4/18/2016 4/18/2016 3 Fee 4/18/2016 4/11/2016 4 4 checks - $17,000 Mailing Labels 4/18/2016 4/18/2016 5 Narrative 4/18/2016 4/15/2016 2 Plan Set 4/18/2016 4/15/2016 19 16 civil pages; 3 arch Plan Set— Updated 5/12/2016 16 Civil only updated Plan Set— Updated 5/25/2016 11 Civil only updated Plan Set— Updated 6/21/2016 6/16/2016 22 18 Civil, 3 elevation, 1 floor plan Prelim Plat 4/18/2016 Final Plat 4/18/2016 Stormwater Report 4/18/2016 4/15/2016 187 Stormwater Report 5/25/2016 5/10/2016 212 Rendering 4/25/2016 1 Rendering— Updated 6/21/2016 6/18/2016 1 Fire Truck Exhibit 5/25/2016 1 Fire Truck Exhibit - Updated 6/21/2016 6/7/2016 1 Title Commitment 5/25/2016 11 Applicant Response 5/25/2016 5/24/2016 5 Applicant Response 6/29/2016 6/29/2016 2 Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Engineer Comments 4/22/2016 5 Engineer Comments 6/1/2016 3 Engineer Comments 6/23/2016 2 Legal Comments 5/5/2016 1 Building Official Comments 4/26/2016 1 Building Official Comments 6/7/2016 1 Building Official Comments 6/29/2016 1 DNR Comments 5/12/2016 3 No comments Elm Creek Review 6/6/2016 6 Mn DOT Review 5/12/2016 2 Mn DOT Review 6/9/2016 1 Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes Planning Commission minutes 6/14/2016 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 6/14/2016 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing — Clough Properties — 45 Highway 55 — Plat, Shoreland Overlay Hardcover Variance - Site Plan Review Finke presented a request from Just for Kix at the property located at 45 Highway 55 for construction of an 18,000 square foot commercial building. He noted that the first request would combine the lot with recently annexed land from Plymouth to make the land one developable site. He stated that a variance is requested from 25 to 50 percent of hardcover, noting that 25 percent hardcover is the maximum allowed within the Elm Creek Shoreland Overlay District and is similar to other adjacent properties. He advised that a rezoning would also be required to match the other surrounding properties, noting that access would be provided from the Aldi site. He noted that if the project moves forward, the existing home would be demolished, noting that the site is next to Aldi and surrounded by the Creek and railroad tracks. He referenced an access to Highway 55, which would be closed. He stated that the use is permitted within the District and with the exception of the variance for hardcover, all other elements of the Shoreland Overlay District would be met. He provided information on the tree preservation and landscaping. He noted that there will be fill in the wetland and the proper approval process and mitigation would be required. He noted that the setbacks from the stream location would be met along with a buffer. He noted that the application would be dependent on the variance request. He advised that similar variances have been approved along Sioux Drive, but noted that each variance must stand on its own and the Commission should review the request against the variance criteria. He noted that the applicant does propose stormwater filtration above and beyond the minimum requirements in order to mitigate the additional hardcover. He reviewed the proposed building materials and design, noting that staff is looking for direction on whether additional modulation would be required. He stated that the applicant does propose access from the property to the west onto Sioux Drive and to close the Highway 55 access, which will be a positive to improving the arterial flow of Highway 55. He stated that the applicant is looking for an emergency access onto Highway 55, noting that it does appear to be supported by MnDOT which would greatly improve the emergency circulation. He stated that staff suggested connecting the sidewalk to the western property line which will improve pedestrian traffic and could connect to Aldi if the sidewalk is extended in that location. He stated that staff supports the plat in any circumstance. He noted that the variance criteria are listed in the staff report along with support of how that criteria is met and advised that there are small technical items that could be updated to meet the standards. He stated that if the Commission finds that the criteria have been met, staff would recommend approval of all three action items. R. Reid asked if the Elm Creek Watershed has reviewed the project. Finke confirmed that the Watershed has reviewed and approved the request, stating there were a few technical items they wanted updated. Andy Brandall, representing the applicant, stated that he is thankful for the cooperation of the City throughout this process. He stated that he and the owner are in agreement with the conditions noted in the staff report and advised that the Watershed took action and approved their portion of the requests at their meeting the previous week. White asked for more information on the building materials. Brandall replied that the owner has decided to go with a predominantly precast building because of the energy efficiency of the materials. He noted that the owner was unable to attend and therefore he was attending in representation. He stated that the general theme (arched windows and rock) is similar to the design of the other studios they own in attempt to mimic an old New York style studio. R. Reid asked if the parents are dropping the children off. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 6/14/2016 Meeting Minutes Brandall replied that there are a lot of younger students and noted the studio design includes a viewing area for parents. He noted that while some parents drop off and pick up, a large amount of parents stay to watch their child. R. Reid asked if this amount of parking would be needed if the City did not require this level of parking. Brandall replied that this amount of parking is actually the bare minimum for the studio and therefore would not want a reduction in parking. R. Reid was not sure how the parking lot will flow, as it seems awkward. She also believed the intersection near Aldi will be problematic as this will add additional traffic to that area. Brandall replied that a traffic study was done with the Aldi development and noted the intended use for this site was actually planned for higher use than this site, as this site will have off-peak use. R. Reid stated that she likes the arched windows and the overall design and materials proposed for the building. She stated that perhaps in other locations the City would not want to compromise to this level, but stated that she would be fine in this instance because the site is unique and would need to be commercial in use. Barry asked if the access to Highway 55 would be closed. Brandall replied that with access being granted through the other property it would have been very difficult to negotiate with MnDOT to maintain the access to Highway 55. He explained that because this is a destination location, the owner was not interested in keeping that access open. Barry replied that he remembers taking his daughter to dance class at 5:30 p.m., which he would not consider to be off-peak. He asked what would happen when classes turn over and there are parents attempting to leave and parents attempting to come and noted that a train could come at the same time which would really throw things off. R. Reid stated that the use would be off-peak because the majority of traffic will come to the site during the evenings and weekends. Barry stated that the Highway 55 access could be used to relieve some of the congestion from the site, but acknowledged that MnDOT may not have given that option. White opened the public hearing at 8:11 p.m. Jim Tiller, in representation of the Arnt property, noted that the sale of the property has closed. He stated, in his opinion, this is a gateway property that will be seen by hundreds of vehicles going west each day and believes that this will be an attractive high quality product. He stated that this will not be a national chain property and will draw attention because it is unique. White closed the public hearing at 8:13 p.m. Barry stated that perhaps the top could include additional modulation. He acknowledged that the parking is intended to support a future addition, but stated that the amount of parking seems excessive for just three studios. He asked when the addition would be planned. 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 6/14/2016 Meeting Minutes Brandall replied that they would like to complete the addition soon, but noted that timing did not work financially at this time to build out the entire building. R. Reid stated that at some time she believes there will be complaints regarding traffic with the railroad. Barry asked if MnDOT would be negotiable to opening the Highway 55 access in the future. Finke replied that MnDOT wants to limit the amount of access onto Highway 55 and once an access is closed it would not be reopened. White noted that there are turn lane improvements being done on Sioux Drive currently. Finke noted that the majority of the traffic would be turning right to access Highway 55 and therefore would not be impacted by trains. Barry asked if there is a way to keep the access to Highway 55 "open" for emergency access, which would provide opportunities for the future. Finke did not believe there was an in between, either it would need to remain open or close. He explained that the access is currently open for one house to access Highway 55 and approval from MnDOT would be needed with the change in use to use that access. He stated that the review and traffic study support that there will not be an issue with the proposed amount of traffic for this site. Barry stated that he would be interested in seeing that traffic study. Murrin stated that the parking lot does not appear to be setup to exit onto Highway 55 and therefore in order to use that access point, the parking lot would need to be reconfigured. She stated that whoever uses this site would have an issue with traffic flow. She asked if MnDOT could be asked whether the access could remain open. Finke stated that the applicant and City presumed closure of that access from the beginning. Brandall replied that because there is an alternative access point from the Aldi site it would be rare that MnDOT would allow the Highway 55 access. Murrin asked who is paying for the turn lane improvements. Finke replied that the business owners are paying for the cost of the project. Murrin stated that MnDOT should be approached to determine if the access could remain open, noting that perhaps a gravel path be used for the time being until it is known if the site will need that additional access. She agreed that further modulation should be added to the top of the building. She noted that perhaps the tan portion could be broken up as well. She stated that she did have concern with filling the wetland, but noted that her concern was addressed through the staff presentation. She stated that she would support the project with additional modulation and would also request from MnDOT to leave the Highway 55 access open. R. Reid stated that perhaps some landscaping could break up the tan wall. 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 6/14/2016 Meeting Minutes Finke stated that the angles should be considered, noting the long wall would not be perfectly in line with Highway 55 as it pivots away. He noted that additional landscaping would be torn out when the addition comes forward. White stated that this project is so much nicer than she anticipated that it would be and appreciated the design of the applicant. She did not anticipate a large traffic problem, noting that if people have a hard time going into a business they most likely will not choose to go there. She stated that the City and businesses have done what they can to mitigate the issue through the Sioux Drive project. She referenced the entrance and suggested modulation above the entrance and noted that similar modulation could occur on the north side when the addition is built. She stated that the brick accents between the windows could be extended to the roof line to provide additional modulation. White confirmed the consensus of the Commission that the criteria for a variance would be met through this request. Murrin asked and received confirmation that both parcels are in Medina, as one portion had previously been located in Plymouth but was annexed. R. Reid stated that she would like to see additional modulation on the north and south sides. Barry agreed that both the Highway 55 side and parking lot sides would need modulation. Murrin stated that the ends also need a little modulation. R. Reid commented that the far end would not be that visible. Barry stated that it would still make sense to remain consistent. White confirmed that the Commission would desire additional modulation on the north, south and west sides. Murrin asked if the applicant should request to keep the MnDOT access open. Finke stated that would go against multiple goals of the City and therefore should not be requested. Motion by Murrin, seconded by Reid, to recommend approval of the Variance, Plat and Site Plan Review, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report with an additional condition requesting additional 3-D modulation on the south, west and north sides. Motion approved unanimously. (Absent: Albers and V. Reid) 4 ,11.RE Building a legacy — your legacy.® atHE June 23, 2016 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Just for Kix Development - Site Plan Review City Project: LR-16-181 WSB Project No. 02712-880 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the Site Plan and Plat submittal we received June 21, 2016 for the Just for Kix Dance Studio. The plans propose to construct a 12,790 square foot facility now with provisions for a 5,250 square foot future addition. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters. Sheet C2.12 1. It appears the sanitary manhole that the service from the building is proposed to be connected into has the wrong invert information shown. It looks like the invert and drop information shown is really for the downstream MCES MH 3A and not the City manhole. The invert elevation of the proposed manhole connection should be field verified and detail(s) provided on how that connection is to be made. 2. A curb stop should be added to the 1 '/z" water service to the building. 3. The note at the bottom of the sheet pertaining to the FES at the end of P-4 incorrectly shows the invert at 968.50 and should be changed to 969.00. 4. Provide drainage and utility easements over the watermain including the hydrant locations. Sheet C3.11 1. Provide quantities (CY) for all rip rap installations. Sheet C3.12 1. An engineered design needs to be submitted for the retaining wall. General 1. The applicant should provide an engineer's estimate for the site improvements including landscaping and irrigation system (if applicable) in Excel format. 2. The applicant should provide a construction schedule for the site improvements. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com Just for Kix Site Plan June 23, 2016 Page 2 Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jim Stremel, P.E. v3 f $ k-rx 4/V4 4 (1►.1'k Mfg- CA ti'.2 7tGs 8x 210 f��7 �'.� �r�s / 6z a'o`ram»Jr A) ? 74; •►� Fi.ce I��./). f Co /C iar4 + to e ie_L:, y. /-1 GAS- T f7 r n1190 ceY g.414 f/L, f 1[ o .21. ! -g iv a d. Hi e. S .90.4_4 if 14 f 15,4. ter e...Cippdi Dal4.Axg/e sA, / / r .Gi CmJleY 6 U�•J" EC Try �'1k di 1st LE. leV 4 fl ... e l 7% S S 6 2. e" ti /4 l/ `fig /04 k �4 ,- cJ e RB 6u.ic mte 740 1MeY. G,L . ,._ s vA iv o h D 4„ .„ C.4 sc7 iv e T 4 f_ 6."-0 �L 'Iv,smvfl 2,11( C'er-4-uc 74'Gs 6 0.1 ./o v t' cox, N®11-7fie- IF aArCe.. ivv /MA AA-, 3"I ptis (0-1 f b z _ (.tee Al AC" "AXI L 1 w f1 S ;to # AP'`""E Dusty Finke From: Spiegel, Jason (DNR) <Jason.Spiegel@state.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 11:20 AM To: Dusty Finke Cc: Drewry, Kate (DNR) Subject: RE: Hardcover variance request - Elm Creek Shoreland Overlay Attachments: shoreland_variance_guidance isc rev 10 10 12.pdf Hi Dusty, We gave this a quick review and will not be offering any specific comments. However, we would like to request that the attached DNR general guidance document be distributed to the City Council/Planning commission for their consideration when they review this and any other shoreland variance applications. Sincerely, Jason Spiegel Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Ecological and Water Resources — Hydrologist 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 651-259-5822 From: Dusty Finke [mailto:Dusty.Finke@ci.medina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 10:14 AM To: Drewry, Kate (DNR) Cc: Spiegel, Jason (DNR) Subject: RE: Hardcover variance request - Elm Creek Shoreland Overlay Hi Kate, They updated plans (link in the attached email), which is probably why the old link was down. Thanks, Dusty From: Drewry, Kate (DNR)[mailto:kate.drewry@state.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 10:10 AM To: Dusty Finke Cc: Spiegel, Jason (DNR) Subject: RE: Hardcover variance request - Elm Creek Shoreland Overlay Hello Dusty: Just getting to this and find that the link to the electronic plans is no longer working. Can you send the materials by pdf? Best Regards, Kate Drewry Metro Area Hydrologist DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources 1 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Shoreland & Floodplain Variance Guidance Series Impervious Surfaces This is one of a series of examples developed as guidance for considering variance requests along lakes and rivers. Consult your local shoreland and floodplain ordinances. Why are impervious surface coverage limits important? In the protection of water quality, the management of rainwater on individual lots is one of our most important tasks. Rainwater that does not infiltrate into the ground or evaporate runs downhill to lakes, wetlands, or rivers. As impervious surface coverage increases, the rate and amount of runoff and pollutants entering public waters + increases. When runoff from impervious surface coverage is not addressed, pollution increases and the diversity of aquatic life is reduced. Local governments have limited discretion to deviate from - or grant a variance to - impervious surface limits. They may do so only if all of the variance criteria established in state statutes and their local ordinances are met. In evaluating such requests, local governments must examine the facts, determine whether all statutory and local criteria are satisfied, and develop findings to support the decision. If granted, local governments may impose conditions to protect resources. An example impervious surface kinkan Orubso variance request, with considerations, is provided below. Sotba:A .y Example Impervious Surface Variance Request A property owner wishes to build a large lakehome on a conforming lot. The lake lot includes a private driveway with a spur to the neighbor's lot, which was placed to avoid an adjacent wetland. The building plans for the new construction plus the existing private road spur to the neighbor's property would exceed the impervious surface limit provision in the local ordinance. Considerations for Findings 11:7 A good record and findings help keep communities out of lawsuits and help them prevail if they find themselves in one. In evaluating the facts and developing findings for this variance request, all of the following statutory criteria must be satisfied, in addition to any local criteria: • Is the variance in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinance? Considering a variance request is a balancing test that requires weighing the need of an individual property owner against the purposes of the shoreland regulations for protecting the public interest. These purposes are derived from Minnesota Shoreland Rules, which established impervious surface caps to prevent excessive runoff from constructed surfaces. Such excessive runoff causes erosion, transport of pollutants to public waters thereby degrading water quality. Considerations: Will deviating from the required limit on this property undermine the purposes and intent of the ordinance? Why or why not? Is it possible to mitigate the consequences of additional impervious surface on -site such that additional runoff will not be produced? Would this mitigation be in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinance? Why or why not? • Is the variance consistent with the comprehensive plan? The local comprehensive plan establishes a framework for achieving a community's vision for the future. Most plans contain goals and policies for protecting natural resources and shorelands, as well as maps that identify areas of high risk or with high ecological value where development should be avoided. The variance request must be considered with these goals and policies in mind. Maps should be consulted to determine if the property is within any areas identified for protection. Considerations: Which goals and policies apply? Is allowing additional impervious surface and runoff consistent with these goals and policies? Why or why not? Page 1 of 2 Variance Guidance Series— ISC, Updated 10/10/2012 " A r e t h e r e u n i q u e c i r c u m s t a n c e s t o t h e p r o p e r t y n o t c r e a t e d b y t h e l a n d o w n e r ? U n i q u e c i r c u m s t a n c e s r e l a t e t o p h y s i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h e l a n d - s u c h a s l o t d i m e n s i o n s , s t e e p s l o p e s , p o o r s o i l s , w e t l a n d s , a n d t r e e s . T h e s e d o n o t i n c l u d e p h y s i c a l l i m i t a t i o n s o r p e r s o n a l c i r c u m s t a n c e s c r e a t e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r t h a t p r e v e n t c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e i m p e r v i o u s s u r f a c e p r o v i s i o n , s u c h a s s i z e o f h o m e o r d e s i g n p r e f e r e n c e s . C o n s i d e r w h a t d i s t i n g u i s h e s t h i s p r o p e r t y f r o m o t h e r s h o r e l a n d p r o p e r t i e s t o j u s t i f y w h y t h e a p p l i c a n t s h o u l d b e a b l e t o d e v i a t e f r o m t h e p r o v i s i o n w h e n o t h e r s m u s t c o m p l y . C o n s i d e r a t i o n s : W h a t p h y s i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s a r e u n i q u e t o t h i s p r o p e r t y t h a t p r e v e n t c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e r e q u i r e m e n t ? W e r e a n y d i f f i c u l t i e s i n m e e t i n g t h e i m p e r v i o u s s u r f a c e l i m i t c r e a t e d b y s o m e a c t i o n o f t h e a p p l i c a n t ? H a s t h e a p p l i c a n t d e m o n s t r a t e d n o o t h e r f e a s i b l e a l t e r n a t i v e s e x i s t t h a t w o u l d n o t r e q u i r e a v a r i a n c e , s u c h a s i n c r e a s i n g t h e s e t b a c k t o r e d u c e d r i v e w a y l e n g t h o r r e d u c i n g t h e l a k e h o m e ' s f o o t p r i n t ? " W i l l t h e v a r i a n c e , i f g r a n t e d , a l t e r t h e e s s e n t i a l c h a r a c t e r o f t h e l o c a l i t y ? C o n s i d e r t h e s i z e o f t h e p r o p o s e d s t r u c t u r e , t h e e x t e n t o f e n c r o a c h m e n t , a n d h o w i t r e l a t e s t o t h e s h o r e l i n e a n d h y d r o l o g y o f t h e r i p a r i a n a r e a . A l a r g e a d d i t i o n l o c a t e d c l o s e t o t h e s h o r e l i n e c a n d e t r a c t f r o m t h e n a t u r a l a p p e a r a n c e a n d c h a r a c t e r o f t h e l a k e a n d i t s r i p a r i a n a r e a s a n d d e g r a d e w a t e r q u a l i t y b y a l t e r i n g t o p o g r a p h y , d r a i n a g e , a n d v e g e t a t i o n i n t h e r i p a r i a n a r e a , n e g a t i v e l y a f f e c t i n g r e c r e a t i o n a l , n a t u r a l , a n d e c o n o m i c v a l u e s . C o n s i d e r a t i o n s : D o e s t h e v a r i a n c e p r o v i d e m i n i m a l r e l i e f o r a s u b s t a n t i a l d e v i a t i o n f r o m t h e r e q u i r e d s e t b a c k ? D o e s i t a f f e c t t h e n a t u r a l a p p e a r a n c e o f t h e s h o r e f r o m t h e l a k e ? D o e s i t a f f e c t t h e h y d r o l o g y o f t h e r i p a r i a n a r e a ? " D o e s t h e p r o p o s a l p u t p r o p e r t y t o u s e i n a r e a s o n a b l e m a n n e r ? E x a m i n e t h e r e a s o n s t h a t t h e v a r i a n c e i s r e q u e s t e d a n d e v a l u a t e t h e m i n l i g h t o f t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h e l o c a l s h o r e l a n d o r d i n a n c e a n d t h e p u b l i c w a t e r r e s o u r c e a t s t a k e . S i n c e t h e i m p e r v i o u s s u r f a c e c a p i s g e n e r a l l y i n t e n d e d t o r e d u c e r u n o f f t o p u b l i c w a t e r s , i t m a y n o t b e a p p r o p r i a t e t o a l l o w l a r g e a r e a s o f c o n s t r u c t e d s u r f a c e s s o c l o s e t o t h e w a t e r . C o n s i d e r a t i o n s : H a s t h e a p p l i c a n t d e m o n s t r a t e d t h a t t h e p r o p o s e d c o n s t r u c t i o n i s r e a s o n a b l e i n t h i s l o c a t i o n g i v e n t h e s e n s i t i v e n a t u r e o f t h e a r e a a n d t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h e r e g u l a t i o n s ? W h y o r w h y n o t ? N o t e : T h e l a s t t h r e e c r i t e r i a a d d r e s s p r a c t i c a l d i f f i c u l t i e s . E c o n o m i c c o n s i d e r a t i o n s a l o n e c a n n o t c r e a t e p r a c t i c a l d i f f i c u l t i e s R a n g e o f O u t c o m e s B a s e d o n t h e f i n d i n g s , s e v e r a l o u t c o m e s c a n o c c u r : " I f t h e a p p l i c a n t f a i l s t o p r o v e t h a t a l l c r i t e r i a a b o v e a r e m e t , t h e n t h e v a r i a n c e m u s t b e d e n i e d . F o r e x a m p l e , t h e l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t c o u l d f i n d t h a t t h e b u i l d i n g p l a n s i t s e l f c r e a t e d t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s n e c e s s a r y f o r a v a r i a n c e r a t h e r t h a n t h e a n y u n i q u e p h y s i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h e p r o p e r t y . " I f t h e a p p l i c a n t d e m o n s t r a t e s t h a t a l l c r i t e r i a a r e m e t , t h e n t h e v a r i a n c e m a y b e g r a n t e d . F o r e x a m p l e , t h e l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t c o u l d f i n d t h a t t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n f o o t p r i n t i s r e a s o n a b l e , t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s a r e u n i q u e g i v e n t h e a d j a c e n t w e t l a n d , a n d t h e m i n o r d e v i a t i o n i n t h e i m p e r v i o u s s u r f a c e c o v e r a g e d o e s n o t a l t e r t h e h y d r o l o g y o f t h e a r e a ( a s d e t e r m i n e d t h r o u g h r u n o f f c a l c u l a t i o n s ) . " I f t h e v a r i a n c e i s g r a n t e d a n d t h e i m p e r v i o u s s u r f a c e i n a n y w a y a l t e r s t h e h y d r o l o g y o f t h e a r e a , t h e n c o n d i t i o n s m a y b e i m p o s e d , s u c h a s t o i n c r e a s e t h e s t r u c t u r e s e t b a c k f r o m t h e l a k e b y 1 5 f e e t t o r e d u c e t h e e x t e n t o f t h e d r i v e w a y a n d m i n i m i z e t h e a m o u n t o f i m p e r v i o u s s u r f a c e c o v e r a g e o v e r t h e l i m i t . C o n d i t i o n s o n V a r i a n c e s I f f i n d i n g s s u p p o r t g r a n t i n g t h e v a r i a n c e , c o n s i d e r a t i o n m u s t b e g i v e n t o t h e i m p a c t s o n t h e p u b l i c w a t e r a n d t h e r i p a r i a n a r e a a n d a p p r o p r i a t e c o n d i t i o n s t o m i t i g a t e t h e m . C o n d i t i o n s m u s t b e d i r e c t l y r e l a t e d a n d r o u g h l y p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e i m p a c t s c r e a t e d b y t h e v a r i a n c e . S e v e r a l e x a m p l e s a r e p r o v i d e d b e l o w : " M o d i f y c o n s t r u c t i o n d e s i g n s ( t o m i n i m i z e i m p a c t ) ; " U s e p e r m e a b l e p a v e m e n t s y s t e m s f o r w a l k w a y s , d r i v e w a y s , o r p a r k i n g a r e a s ( t o r e d u c e e f f e c t i v e i m p e r v i o u s s u r f a c e a r e a a n d i n f i l t r a t e r u n o f f ) ; " D i r e c t r a i n g u t t e r d i s c h a r g e s a w a y f r o m t h e p u b l i c w a t e r s a n d i n t o i n f i l t r a t i o n b a s i n s ( t o r e d u c e c o n n e c t e d i m p e r v i o u s c o v e r a g e t o a l l o w a d d i t i o n a l a r e a s f o r i n f i l t r a t i o n ) ; " P r e s e r v e a n d r e s t o r e s h o r e l i n e v e g e t a t i o n i n a n a t u r a l s t a t e ( t o i n t e r c e p t a n d f i l t e r r u n o f f c o m i n g f r o m s t r u c t u r e s a n d d r i v e w a y s ) ; a n d / o r " I n c r e a s e s e t b a c k s f r o m t h e o r d i n a r y h i g h w a t e r l e v e l ( t o p r o v i d e i n f i l t r a t i o n n e a r p u b l i c w a t e r s ) . M o r e i n f o r m a t i o n a t : w w w . d n r . s t a t e . m n . u s / w a t e r s / w a t e r m g m t s e c t i o n / s h o r e l a n d / v a r i a n c e s . h t m l P a g e 2 o f 2 V a r i a n c e G u i d a n c e S e r i e s 1 S C , U p d a t e d 1 0 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 2 ISG April 15, 2016 Dusty Finke City Planner Planning Department City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 RE: Just For Kix Project Description and Application Narrative Medina, Minnesota Dusty: Please consider the following project description and narrative during the review process for the attached Application for Planning Consideration for the following types of requests: • Site Plan Review • Preliminary & Final Plat Review • Variance Request • Lot Combination All supplemental information required by the respective review processes has also been attached to provide a comprehensive review. The Application for Planning Consideration and supplemental information are being submitted as part of a request to allow development of an existing residential site to accommodate a new 18,040 square foot Just For Kix Dance Studio. Development of the proposed new dance studio will also include construction of a new parking lot to serve the facility as well as the necessary site improvements including the associated, drive aisles, stormwater facilities, and utilities. The proposed site is located at 45 State Highway No. 55 in Medina, Minnesota. Initially, the proposed project site was comprised of two parcels. Once parcel was located in Medina, Minnesota (PID#: 1211823410007), and the other in Plymouth, Minnesota (PID#: 0711822320003). Through completion of a formal detachment/annexation process, the 0.57 acres of property located within the City of Plymouth has been detached and concurrently annexed to the City of Medina. The properties are described as Part of Lot 34 Auditor's Subdivision No. 241 and Part of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 Section 7, Township 118, Range 22 as illustrated on the attached Preliminary Plat. After platting this newly annexed parcel with the adjacent subject property, the parcel will total 2.199 acres and will be described as Lot 1, Block 1, Just For Kix as illustrated on the attached Final Plat. In addition, the two parcels were formerly two individual lots based on their location within their corresponding City. A lot combination will be required to combine these individual lots into one lot within the City of Medina. The parcel is zoned as CH -RR: Commercial Highway -Railroad District with Shoreland Overlay. The proposed use is consistent with the City of Medina's Comprehensive Plan and City Zoning Ordinance. Since dance studios and other commercial business related industries are permitted within the CH -RR Zoning District, no zoning modifications will be required to facilitate the proposed project. The site is bordered by Elm Creek to the northwest and Trunk Highway No. 55 to the northeast and the site is served by an existing access and utilities from Highway No. 55. The following figures provide the anticipated public utility usage generated by the redeveloped site, including estimated water and sanitary sewer usage: Proposed Site Usages Type SF % of Site Dance 18,040 18.90 Parking/Access 28,976 30.4 Stormwater Management 12,561 13.2 Landscaping 36,228 37.5 Total 95,805 100 Proposed Site Utility Usages Type Monthly (Gallons) Yearly (Gallons) Domestic Water 6,000 72,000 Sanitary 6,000 72,000 7900 International Drive + Suite 550 + Minneapolis, MN 55425 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING ISG Site work for the proposed project will include, but not limited to, grading, paving, landscaping, lighting, extension of the existing curb and gutter, water, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer as well as other general site work as required to complete construction. Demolition and removal of the existing residential building will also be required to accommodate the proposed development. In addition, the proposed project will include construction of a retaining wall on the south side of the site to control and appropriately direct drainage resulting from development of the site. Construction of two (2) new filtration basins is proposed on the north and east side of the site as illustrated in the attached site plans and supplemental information to manage stormwater runoff created by the development of the site. Stormwater from the southwest portion of the site will be directed to the corresponding north basin and stormwater from the east portion will drain toward the east basin. Stormwater will then be treated by pretreatment basins and eventually overflow into the adjacent ditchway that drains into Elm Creek, or into the MNDOT right-of-way. Based on the Shoreland Overlay District requirements, impervious surfacing is limited to 25% of the total site area. To accommodate the proposed new dance studio and to meet City of Medina parking requirements, a variance is required to increase the allowable impervious area to 50%. Please note that the variance requested is the minimum application required to alleviate the development condition. The requested variance will not be materially or otherwise detrimental to the purposes of the Medina Zoning Ordinance or to other properties within the CH -RR Zoning District, and will not create any negative impacts to the health, safety, or welfare of neighboring properties or the general public. Due to the traffic already generated by neighboring commercial properties, traffic volume within the area is not anticipated to increase dramatically as a result of the proposed development. No pollution, negative impacts to the environment, or effects on existing waterways or the capacity of flood plains are anticipated as a result of this project. In addition to the Application for Planning Consideration process, an application for Request for Plan Review and Approval, along with the required supplemental information, has also been submitted to the Elm Creek Watershed District for review and approval. There are adjacent properties within the proposed project area that have been granted variances to mitigate similar conditions and allow performance of ordinary operations afforded to other similarly situated tenants of like business. Therefore, no special privileges will result from approval of the variance. Rather, granting the requested variance will afford the same opportunities to the subject parcel. Approval of the proposed project will provide a complementary use and an added amenity to the area within an existing development district. The project is consistent with pertinent orderly development guidelines, and all applicable local ordinances and regulations affecting redevelopment of this property have been considered and adhered to during the design process. This project is an appropriate land use within the district and meets adequate setbacks and parking requirements for the proposed use. These considerations along with the supplemental information provided within this submittal support approval the attached Application for Planning Consideration. Please contact me at 952-426-0699 if there is any additional information we can provide in support of this request on behalf of Just For Kix. Respectfully Submitted, Andrew T. Brandel, PE Associate Principal, Engineer Civil Engineering Group ATB/jrc Page 2 of 2 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com LEGEND -WET— fi Bituminous Surface Concrete Surface Existing Building Iron Monument Found Utility Pole/Guy Wire Hydrant Water Valve Gas Meter Electric Meter Post Manhole Sign Mailbox Deciduous Tree Sanitary Sewer Line Storm Sewer Line Underground Gas Line Overhead Utility Llne Fence Treeline Water's Edge Guardrail Sanitary Forcemain FEMA Base Flood Elevation Line Delineated Wet Land Line '\ oyfi0n I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I r. — _ Right °f Way Eosement h —Per Certilcote o! d• ---- NE Comer Comer - \ \ Lot 35 BMTNFH H-T---9626� \ _ Centen/n �I andg\Ma��a�Paw ay) ( \\ j9 0 APPROXIMATE FEMA FLOOD WAY ZONE AE 1/2"1,1 o. 589°39'34"W 263.80 Parcel 1 v (/ — ,\ oQ —971— 9T2— -- �i•�! Q C o \7'1=--Nate[main Easement / `w \(/ Preps, tx_.lSG � r '� / ' � I , , 1 / IA A Not lnc/uded le i 1� !/r / / r �;�?/�emmitment ���_/L_!/_., � , �,.y/ L/ I � jy L \ red \ =tes N. Line - Lot 34 -{ E 1/4 Corner i Sec. Sec. 12-118-23 Found CIM 4 =1°11'20"A C.=49.64 e10 oshah?, o=ticg_�g2-Tu pip v \ "( �AA. `—moo--- �EcoT,e`� --naund-GlM�li I/2"IRON RLS 10939 o. e �Yo'esT rrd y'I'o sBj 'TS JUST FOR KIX EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (per Certificate of Title No. 1331968) Real property in the of Medina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, described as follows: Par 1: Lot 34, except that part lying West of a line running North and South through said lot; which line is described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast comer of Lot 35, Auditor's Subdivision Number 241, thence North to a point on the North line of Lot 34, said Addition, which is situated 263.8 feet West from the East Quarter post in Section 12, Township 118, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in Auditor's Subdivision Number 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision Number 241, described as follows: Commencing at the East Quarter post in Section 12, Township 118, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, thence West along the North line of said Lot 34, 263.8 feet, thence South on a straight line towards the Northeast comer of Lot 35, Auditor's Subdivision Number 241 to the Northerly line of the State Highway, thence Easterly along the Northerly line of the State Highway to the East line of said Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision Number 241, thence North along the said East Line of said Lot 34 to point of beginning. Par 2: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 118, Range 22, described as follows to -wit: Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said Section 7 and the North line of the Right of Way of the Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company, thence North along the said West line of said Section 7 to the South line of State Trunk Highway No. 55, thence Southeasterly along the South line of said State Trunk Highway No. 55 to the North line of said Right of Way of said Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company; thence West along the said North line of said Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company to place of beginning. OWNERS/DEVELOPERS: Clough Properties, LLC 6948 Lake Forest Road Brainerd, MN 56401 AREA TABLE: Lot 1 Block 1 = 95,806 sq. ft. Right of Way = 72,995 sq. ft. Total = 168,801 sq. ft SURVEYOR: ISG 115 E. Hickory Street Suite 300 Mankato, MN 56001 (507)-387-6651 PROPOSED PROPERTY: ZONED: CH -RR (Commercial Highway -Railroad with Shoreland Oveday) Setbacks Front Side Rear Elm Creek Buildin 25 feet 15 feet 25 feet 50 feet Parkins( 25 feet 10 feet 10 feet 50 feet BENCHMARK: Top nut fire hydrant located at southeast comer of Lot 36, Auditor's Subdivision No. 241. Elevation = 982.67 (NAVD88) FLOOD ZONE: Parts of the surveyed property shown on this survey map are in Flood Zone AE (base flood elevations determined), Flood Zone X (areas of 0.2 % annual chance flood; areas of 1 % annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1 % annual chance flood), and Flood Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2 % annual chance floodplain) according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 27053C0167E, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date September 2, 2004. Flood zone areas are shown on this survey. N 0 40 i IN 80 Scale: In Feet _ N.1Le - Soo LTe Rsllmad-_ \ �_ \ \\� —(EornerFIVIinnEapolis; SLPaul, \ � \ \ \ ` '—M.1t ste-alade_Raawayj \ \ \ ��c\_� \ - =` 0 =_�= F80-=- _ --FB0 �— = Fao-�t �L V F \p �� _AZ.\\�� \ ��___- -- VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) SEC. 7 TWP. 118, RGE. 22 SEC. 12 TWP. 118, RGE. 23 Hennepin County, Minnesota KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DANIEL L. STUEBER DATE LIC. NO.43110 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF 18 S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX Part of Lot 34, Auditors Subdivision No. 241 and part of the NW 1/4 - SW 1/4, Section 7-118-22, City of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 15-18393 FILE NAME 18393 PPLAT DRAWN BY KH DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 4/15/16 CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET 1 OF 1 FINAL PLAT FOR REVIEW INSTRUMENT OF DEDICATION /I // // /> / //--/ Rght of , y Easement _� per Cerf'f.'cate of 7y 1 EXcePt'' 0 _ vv m -- M t9 - Z 1/2'IRo RLS 43110 NE Corner --' Lot 35 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N to " Z 1 I Oat 1RoN -- RLS/17006 / F / Maters Edge / 1 112712016 1 1 Elev=957.0 I b,NAVD(88)i \ w__ S73o1g?3„ 76.50 G- •c � N NN -2to 0 - 1/2' 1 WET LAND Wer_ 1/2"IRON RLS 43110 A.- ceg` ,'s 8857 3 44F 589°39'34"W 263.80 1 N. Line - Lot 34 -1 EXceo' E1/4 Comer I Sec. Sec. 12-118-23 Found CIM A. A', IS ,...--- Co I5 Q, m' 1h a a �< o72jC �' --- Z h' '70 4°2 e, /22 ?2S6,8°2 ,07B 22 Q F 6 ° v i Drainage Easement l /3 ° `� 0 I/2' MOR V(/ ��e jp RLS 10938 42P N 1/2'1RoR RLS 10938 0 JUST FOR KIX N 40 80 ••• MI Scale in Feet BEARING NOTE: The orientation of this bearing system is based on the west line of SW 1/4 of Sec. 7, Twp. 118, Rge 22. Said line bears South 02 degrees 07 minutes 48 seconds West. BENCHMARK: MnDOT monument 2722 Y MnDOT Elev=979.68 (NAVD88) s \ r \ do T73'y'po \w� 't >\ 52T0 \ \ / 'fie/ //I /� / �r5 L ,, ur/'try E eemanr T ./ 1715 Nf6%1T45"E 1 1 1�573°12'15E Snfa r 11/i/ I/ is 12 „<_ ry s wa_ _ I s rzar LO - - _ r sewer c semeor ' Per Ooc. No. /-,/ ram./1 //F1/7 / L/lam _ -,/ =518.47 Q-576.7R=1835,32 5 C.Brg=N824y9 W ( entl Sault Ste. Marriie/Ra W 3r SE Comer , Sec. Sec. 12-118-23 Found CIM 11'09" \ s�Ore \ o �e \ \\ 5'4 \ >is 7e>y \ \ \ \ \ �r \ ,\ \ \ \ \\\ \', vs17 \ \` \ 3 C 2J979S 't4�Qg° Q‘S2a. ,N0 A. LEGEND • IRON MONUMENT FOUND O INDICATES 1/2" DIA. x 18" LONG SOLID IRON PIPE SET WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY ISG, LICENSE NO. 43110 TO BE SET BEFORE TIME OF RECORDING. w-- WATER'S EDGE WET - - WET LAND LINE VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) SEC. 7 TWP. 118, RGE. 22 SEC. 12 TWP. 118, RGE. 23 Hennepin County, Minnesota o� ---'----Sanitary Sewer Easement per Doc. No. T05292265 N. Line - Soo Line Railroad (Formerly Minneapolis, St.Paul, and Sault Ste. Marie Railway) 1/2' IRON RLS 17006 o° ao 0 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Clough Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Real property in the of Medina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, described as follows: R.T DOC. NO Par 1: Lot 34, except that part lying West of a line running North and South through said lot; which line is described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast comer of Lot 35, Auditors Subdivision Number 241, thence North to a point on the North line of Lot 34, said Addition, which is situated 263.8 feet West from the East Quarter post in Section 12, Township 118, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in Auditor's Subdivision Number 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision Number 241, described as follows: Commencing at the East Quarter post in Section 12, Township 118, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, thence West along the North line of said Lot 34, 263.8 feet, thence South on a straight line towards the Northeast corner of Lot 35, Auditor's Subdivision Number 241 to the Northerly line of the State Highway, thence Easterly along the Northerly line of the State Highway to the East line of said Lot 34, Auditors Subdivision Number 241, thence North along the said East Line of said Lot 34 to point of beginning. Par 2: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 118, Range 22, described as follows to -wit: Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said Section 7 and the North line of the Right of Way of the Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company, thence North along the said West line of said Section 7 to the South line of State Trunk Highway No. 55, thence Southeasterly along the South line of said State Trunk Highway No. 55 to the North line of said Right of Way of said Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company; thence West along the said North line of said Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company to place of beginning. Together with an easement for right-of-way 16.5 feet wide along the South side of that part of Lot 34 in Auditors Subdivision Number 241, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies West of the above described line. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as JUST FOR KIX and does hereby dedicate to the public, for public use, the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Clough Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20 Signed: Clough Properties, LLC Chief Manager State of County of This instrument was acknowledged before me on 20 by Chief Manager, of Clough Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. (sign) (print) Notary Public My Commission Expires SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, Daniel L. Stueber, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been or, will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of 20 . Daniel L. Stueber, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 43110 State of Minnesota County of Blue Earth This instrument was acknowledged before me on 20 by Daniel L. Stueber, Licensed Land Surveyor. Kent A. Hays Notary Public, Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2020 CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING COMMISSION Be it known that at a meeting held on this day of 20 , the Planning Commission of the City of Medina did hereby review and approve this plat of JUST FOR KIX. Chair Person Secretary CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MEDINA MINNESOTA This plat of JUST FOR KIX, was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Mayor City Administrator -Clerk SURVEY DIVISION, HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 3838.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of 20 . Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor by RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20 and prior years have been paid for the land described on this plat, dated this day of 20 . Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor by Deputy REGISTRAR OF TITLES HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA I hereby certify that the within plat of JUST FOR KIX was recorded in this office this day of 20 at o'clockM. I SG �• 1 Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles by Deputy MEDINA, MINNESOTA LEGEND EXISTING INN CITY LIMITS SECTION LINE QUARTER SECTION LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE PROPERTY /LOTLINE EASEMENT LINE o A ACCESS CONTROL w WATER EDGE WETLAND BOUNDARY • 211, WETLAND/MARSH FENCE LINE CULVERT STORM SEWER < SANITARY SEWER <II SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER - - UT - - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE - - of - - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC - - UE - - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - - u - - UNDERGROUND TV G GAS - - FRO - - UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC - - 990 - CONTOUR (MAJOR) - - - 989 - - - CONTOUR (MINOR) DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE TREE LINE O MANHOLE/STRUCTURE O CATCH BASIN b HYDRANT C4 VALVE ® CURB STOP PJ POWER POLE D UTILITY PEDESTAL / CABINET nEr ,tlE --- xxx ---- x >---« -- G PROPOSED -« «- •1- OE UE UTV c 1015 • LOT LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT CULVERT STORM SEWER STORM SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) WATER OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TV GAS CONTOUR MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT VALVE JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR: REVIEW SET 6-17-2016 LOCATION MAP 0 500' 1000' L�lotiO G-�XON PREGONSIRV NOS FOR ISG PROJECT # 16-18393 T1.11 C1.11 C1.12 C2.11 C2.12 C3.11 C3.12 C4.11 C4.12 C5.11 C5.12 C5.13 C5.14 C5.15 C6.11 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 SHEET INDEX TITLE SHEET EXISTING SITE AND REMOVAL PLAN TREE REMOVAL PLAN SITE PLAN SITE UTILITY PLAN SITE GRADING PLAN RETAINING WALL PROFILE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTES & DETAILS SITE DETAILS SITE DETAILS SITE DETAILS SITE DETAILS SITE DETAILS SITE LIGHTING PLAN PLANTING PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND NOTES RESTORATION PLAN PROJECT GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL (WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS), DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT AND COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK. 3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 5. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OF DETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR IN CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 6. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED. AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 7. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TO AVOID GALVANIC CORROSION. 8. THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, MINIMUM 2 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION (1-800-252-1166). JUSTFORKI OR CONS RtiOtION Npj KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 16-18393 FILE NAME 18393 T1-TITLE SHEET DRAWN BY JMF DESIGNED BY RJA PROJECT INDEX: REVIEWED BY ATB ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06107/16 CLIENT PROJECT NO. OWNER: STEPHEN J. CLOUGH 6948 LAKE FOREST ROAD BRAINERD, MINNESOTA 56401 PH: 218-829-7107 PROJECT ADDRESS / LOCATION: 45 HWY 55 MEDINA, MINNESOTA 55340 S: 12, T: 118N, R: 23W MEDINA, HENNEPIN, MINNESOTA MANAGING OFFICE: Minneapolis, St. Paul 7900 International Drive Suite 550 Minneapolis, Minnesota PHONE: 952-426-0699 PROJECT MANAGER: Andy Brandel EMAIL: Andy.Brandel@is•grp.com SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCE ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA'S REQUIREMENTS AND MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2016 EDITION, AND THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND WATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2013, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. PROJECT DATUM HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83(1996)) ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATES FOR THIS PROJECT. B.M. ELEVATION=982.67 T.N.F.H. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 241 BEHIND THE SOUTH CURB OF ACCESS DRIVE. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY THIS PROJECTS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS OF DATA COLLECTED ON 1-27-16 AND 3-25-16 BY ISG,INC. TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET T1.11 d72 z^ °\ M� _ JI11 ° - ELM CREEK NORTH TOP OF BANK ELM CREEK SOUTH TOP OF BANK ) I\r ELM CREEK BUFFER ' s j \ 1 1 1 \\ \ s �" \ I\ a \ I I' I �\ 1 I I \\\ 1 / / / / \ I / �. I { / / \\\ I II4� `I �\ Il \ \ M `/ / j "v/ / //`, / / � \ \\ \ \ \ \ 4/7 / \ z )t` I 1 \\ /c i/%/ /l kI I \ _ /� /\/ /%�// v � � � ' / \\ ° — 1� 2"/ / / \-7�—� _ _ _fl / / r v ro/ 6 -7s— 0-77 98 — _ — X / \ q // \ 1 \_— — — — E$O \ —974 — _—� --7 G— --__ __---_ Fao �/ 89 L — J 9 \\ \ NN \\ \ \▪ \ \ �0 \ \ \ 3\ INPLACE TREE TO REMAIN, TYo. 97 9491(-�� X91 92�93 i / � 1 CLEAR 8 GRUB INPLACE TREE, TYP. \ \ \ \ Tablet. Tree Assessment 50e summary T ree species Number I Gpu+rnon Name - — Scientific Name 0 7 Niarerixan Basswood TAB esters:ace _ 99 lAma+kan EM Wm oa amercana 70 'Ameetan Besewoed Tact mmome.ara 091-1 Condition I Inches) Sh9ofulral NeaRhrFohage Recommend atWn 1p 419 1< rrierre Rem+rre 10 ea f-em:cir�m T- 9 T 4-plow 1 Arbon's, Rrn+rrre I Reasoning for Recommendation 71 'AmeNCan eeeewood 7Na omen:aoo —._ 72 -Boxelder Ater me9onrxa T3 —-r. Green Ash Fraxrnss perteraykarace 74 American Basswood iaID amertene 20 1-exc=rent f-excei�nt 91 ...— 3-tart 1.excell nl 19 2-good 1.excellant 2-good ceNnl R„bon R edm Red+n Reran I Ts Amercan Basswood 76 Green Ash 77 American Sim 76 I Green Ash 79 Green Ash Ta& ac ne 26 iTaYm Spe nsyNamco WM us mncr eerro FraxbuS psrmsykein-se Fraxm Sae .nsYNonrta 2-good 1 etc.ellant 19-9cellen u 1 cellant 1-e'ceAare lbxcellent 0W 3dak Retain Retain Retain ea+estrgete Retain 9ne SN emereb #eh ter 80 ; American Basswood 81 i Arne,IC an Babswoaa 82 I Green Ash 83 'Green Ash f Yeameoca. Halmos pennsyNe.nce Ir'ramus pe.sYNs. 13 2-good 1lxo9MrR 20 2-good �. _ ;lxcsiefR 10 1-excellent 7lkCeheat 1e 2•good 84 96 'Btao9ter 6s 1 ..141Beftain FaSSwoOd Ace, 9999990 ACer envied, 7ga a erlcarre 11 10 1.9b 9INnt 2-goad 1-raceeent iirTcsient 87 I G n0.5h 88 C en Ash as &son Ash 90 pale ..:. ea roue 9` Boxerdw 93 Ceen Ash 94 C eon Ash 95 Carson Ash 95 App15 9' "Btxaelsr 98 No{rdentred 99 Nal gers99.1 Fraxm S psrurSyNamce Hankers pe syNarrc ra.Onus F....noorkmnee Md tuft aFp mabs grp rie., W900110 Fatima OOW ' e e=rexbus Warray ice F exstue eenneykanite Mobs Salo. At* seprorda 14 9 13 9 9 16 23 1-e%Ce11ent 1-etcellent #-poor 3- fair 2-good 2-gX9 2.2994 1 excellent ReirsoitS Rot preserS poor quails Reis n Retsin Retain Retain RoiprestSrS poor quaky 1 roes located west guyed • B.M. ELEVATION =982.67 T.N.F.H. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 241 BEHIND THE SOUTH CURB OF ACCESS DRIVE. • Scale in Feet JUST FOR la I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Andrew T. Brandel I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DATE LIC NO TtilS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. NO JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 16-18393 FILE NAME 18393 C1-EXIST DRAWN BY JMF DESIGNED BY RJA REVIEWED BY ATB ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/07/16 CLIENT PROJECT NO. --- TREE REMOVAL PLAN 24\ vF II�� �_,.._� \ �, ELM CREEK BUFFER -1 ' ,, �I ^I I CONSTRUCT SWALE �, CHECK DAM, TYP. OF 3 (SEE DETAIL) ELM CREEK NORTH TOP OF BANK CONSTRUCT 6"-30" NATURAL STONE RIPRAP ON MNDOT TYPE VII GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (HATCH) ELM CREEK SOUTH TOP OF BANK CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WALK SECTION (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) F&I: PARKING LOT STRIPING, TYP. CONSTRUCT MODULAR RETAINING WALL (SEE DETAIL) 2" � a CONSTRUCT STOOP, (SEE DETAIL) CONSTRUCT 5'X5' STOOP, TYP. 3 (SEE DETAIL) F&I: HANDICAP SIGN, TYP OF 3 (MOUNT TO BUILDING) (SEE DETAIL) CONSTRUCT STANDARD BITUMINO 5- F&I: CATEGORY III TRM E.O.F. ELEV=973.00 (SEE DETAIL) CONSTRUCT MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL STR-01) F&I: HANDICAP STRIPING, TYP. OF 3 Feo PAVEMENT SECTION (SHADEXSEE DETAIL) Feo ` \ ao SITE AREA CALCULATIONS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA EXISTING OPEN AREA TOTAL SITE AREA * REQUIRED OPEN AREA *'PROPOSED OPEN AREA PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA TOTAL SITE AREA EXISTING SITE = 4,289 sf = 91,516 sf = 95,805 sf PROPOSED SITE _ * 47,902 sf = 48,587 sf = 47,219 sf = 95,805 sf 0.09 ac 2.10 ac 2.19 ac * 1.09 ac 1.11 ac 1.08 ac 1.19 ac * 25% MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA ALLOWED PER SHORELAND OVERLAY. IMPERVIOUS AREA UP TO 50% REQUIRES VARIANCE **SITE CALCULATIONS INCLUDE FUTURE PHASE II ADDITION 4.5% 95.5% 100% * 50% 50.7% 49.3% 100% CONSTRUCT PRETREATMENT BASIN #2 (HATCH) TOP = 972.00' NWL = 971.00' BASE = 968.00' — FFr, SETBACK DATA: ZONING AREA: CH -RR (COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY -RAILROAD DISTRICT WITH SHORELAND OVERLAY) BUILDING SETBACK: PARKING SETBACK: FRONT SIDE REAR ELM CREEK 25' 15' 25' 50' 25' 10' 10' 50' R4.5' \ Ao F&I: CATEGORY III TRM ELEV =971.00 (SEE DETAIL) CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #1 (HATCH) TOP = 973.50' 100YR = 972.00' OUTLET = 970.50 BASE = 969.00' CONSTRUCT PRETREATMENT BASIN #1 (HATCH) TOP = 973.50' NWL = 971.00' BASE = 968.00' �o STORMWATER MAINTENANCE ACCESS AREA (HATCH) CONSTRUCT FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS DRIVE (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) R3' 12 F&I: "NO PARKING" YELLOW STRIPING CONSTRUCT TURN DOWN STYLE CONCRETE WALK, TYP. (HATCH) (SEE DETAIL) \ S nitory Sewer Easement ��_____---'�� Oer Doo. No. 3B39931 ______ _— PARKING DATA: TOTAL BUILDING AREA= 18,040 S.F. LOT SIZE = 2.20 AC. PARKING STALLS REQUIRED = 73 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = 73 (BASED ON 1 STALL PER 250 S H.C. STALLS REQUIRED=3 H.C. STALLS PROVIDED =3 \\ N N \ \\ N F&I CURB CUT WI SPILLWAY (SEE DETAIL) (TYP. OF 4) STORMWATER MAINTENANCE ACCESS AREA (HATCH) F&I: PYLON SIGN (SEE DETAIL) — — — _ _ _ ,,Sonita , Sewec fosemellk CONSTRUCT LIGHT POLE, TYP. — _ unreearaea, doled m/zalo SEE LIGHTING PLAN - — — - CONSTRUCT B618 CURB & GUTTER, TYP. (SEE DETAIL) NOTE: P&L ALL PARKING LOT STRIPING AND MARKINGS AS SHOWN NOTE: INDICATES REVERSE PITCH CURB illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll F&I: CATEGORY III TRM ELEV: 970.50 (SEE DETAIL) CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN#2 -FM (HATCH) per TOP = 971.50' 100YR = 971.01' OUTLET = 970.50' BASE = 969.00' - -Sanitary sewer Easement per Doc. Na, T05292265 B.M. ELEVATION=982.67 T.N.F.H. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, AUDITOR'S SUBDMSION NO. 241 BEHIND THE SOUTH CURB OF ACCESS DRIVE. 0 20 40 60 Scale in Feet Just FORKi ..�� FOR K coNSRU NOLA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 16-18393 FILE NAME 18393 C2-SITE DRAWN BY JMF DESIGNED BY RJA REVIEWED BY ATB ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/07/16 CLIENT PROJECT NO. --- TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET C2.11 \ I I\ 11 I F&1:6" SAN SERVICE @ 5.31 % �1 I \ I I \1 \ CONNECT SANITARY SERVICE TO CITY MANHOLE. SEE CITY OF MEDINA PLATE SAN-04 DETAIL FOR DROP INLET CONNECTION. (VERIFY ELEVATIONS) F&1:12" RCP FES W/ NATURAL STONE RIPRAP ON MnDOT TYPE VII GEOTEXTILE FABRIC I=959.00 - 2" \ o II \\ \ o FM: 5"x8' HYDRANT & 6" GATE VALVE & BOX I I TIE LAST 3 JOINTS OF P-6 AND F.E.S. PER MnDOT STANDARDS i I PROPOSED GAS SERVICE (COORDINATE W/ UTILITY COMPANY) P-6 (12") CONNECT PROPOSED 8" WATERMAIN \ TO INPLACE MAIN. F&I: VALVE AND APPURTENANCES AS NECCESARY TO R=973.00 - MAKE CONNECTION. 1=964.50 (12") F&I: CATEGORY III TRM E.O.F. ELEV: 973.00 (SEE DETAIL) \ 3 / / _ I I sawTuer � -'- "� C CONNECT 6" SUBDRAIN \\� II 1=966.20 / / /\( F&I: 6" 22.5° BEND ' ADJUST INPLACE SAN. MANHOLE RIM ELEVATION=976.49 jJ_,/� L r CONNECT PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE TO INP. ELECTRIC (COORDINATE W/ UTILITY COMPANY) • MAINTAIN A MIN. OF 7.5' COVER DEPTH OVER WATERMAIN IN POND AREA i R=965.22 1=959.24 (12") 1=959.01(12") / 2" � a CONNECT 6" SUBDRAIN 1=964.70 CONNECT TO INP. GAS SERVICE (COORDINATE W/ GAS COMPANY) C-o \ MANHOLE en.ar 6" NON -PERFORATED \ SUBDRAIN v 3" �q 6" SUBDRAIN C.O. 6" PERFORATED SUBDRAIN (SEE DETAIL) F&1:8" WATERMAIN FUTURE PHASE 5,250 SFADDITIOIV GAS METER LOCATION (COORDINATE W/ UTILITY COMPANY) CONSTRUCT 6" SAN SEWER SERVICE TO 5' OUTSIDE OF BUILDING.1=969.00 CONSTRUCT SANITARY C.O. 1=968.47 TC=974.30 1,970.90 (12") F&I: 6"x8' TEE -F&I: 8" VALVE -F&I: 8"x11.25° BEND -CONNECT PROPOSED WATER SERVICE TO INPLACE 8" GATE VALVE FM: 8"x45° BEND 6" SUBDRAIN C.O. 1=966.67 MAINTAIN A MIN. OF 7.5' COVER DEPTH OVER WATERMAIN IN POND AREA CONSTRUCT 1-1/2" DOMESTIC WATER TO 5' OUTSIDE OF BUILDING FM: 5"x8' HYDRANT & 6" GATE VALVE & BOX FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (SEE ARCH) FM: POST INDICATOR VALVE F&I: 5"x8' HYDRANT & 6" GATE VALVE & BOX (SEE DETAIL) ��� ------ I -T 1=970.63(12") _ 1=970.0=8973.9112------ )11 ) _ = _ --- 97�.63 �2„) _ TI �_v F&1:1-1/2" CURB STOP < - 1=970.3(12")") i F&1: 8"X6" TEE F&I: 90°x8" BEND - 3S CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #1(HATCH) TOP = 973.50' 100YR = 972.00' OUTLET = 970.50 BASE = 969.00' 1=964.93 FM: CATEGORY III TRM ELEV.=971.00 (SEE DETAIL ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER (COORDINATE WI UTILITY COMPANY) CRITICAL CROSSING: MAINTAIN MIN.18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SERVICES F&I: 6"x8' TEE F&I: 8"X6" TEE & VALVE CONSTRUCT PRETREATMENT BASIN #2 (HATCH) TOP = 972.00' NWL = 971.00' BASE = 968.00 CONNECT RETAINING WALL SUBDRAIN TO 6" NON -PERFORATED SUBDRAIN (ENSURE POSITIVE SLOPE TO BASIN) STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE STRUCT. NO. M.H. TYPE CASTING PAY HGT. LN FT. TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION INVERT/SUMP ELEVATION PIPE NO. A-1 MnDOT 4020-48 NEENAH R-3067 w/TYPE VB GRATE 5.53 973.91 968.38 P-1 A-2 3'x2' CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) NEENAH R-3067 w/TYPE VB GRATE 3.50 974.31 970.81 P-2 A9 3'82 CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) NEENAH R-3067 w7TYPE VB GRATE 3.38 974.30 970.92 P6 A-0 12" NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN 12' NYLOPLAST DOME GRATE 2.23 971.00 968.77 P-4 A5 OUTLET STRUCTURE SEE DETAIL 8.50 973.00 964.50 P-5. A6 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE TYPE II NEENAH R-4342 w/BEEHIVE GRATE 6.20 965.22 959.01 P6 CONSTRUCT PRETREATMENT BASIN #1 (HATCH) TOP = 973.50' NWL= 971.00' BASE = 968.00' F&1:12" HDPE FES W/ 8 CY MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON MnDOT TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1=970.00 • STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULE PIPE NO. DRAIN FROM INLET ELEVATION DRAIN TO OUTLET ELEVATION PIPE SIZE PIPE TYPE PIPE GRADE PIPE LENGTH P-1 A-1 970.38 PRETREATMENT BASIN#1 970.00 12" HDPE 0.36% 105' P-2 A-2 970.63 A-1 970.38 12" HDPE 0.36°% 69' P-3 A-3 970.90 A-2 970.63 12" HDPE 0.36% 75' P4 A-4 969.27 PRETREATMENT BASIN 62 969.00 12" HDPE 0.36% 75' P-5 A-5 964.50 A6 959.24 12" HDPE 12.15% 43' P-6 A-6 959.01 ELM CREEK 959.00 12" RCP 0.10% 14' CRITICAL CROSSING: TOP OF WATER = 964.00 BOTTOM OF STORM = 970.00 (MAINTAIN MIN.18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SERVICES) SANITARY ""$iE MVERTR.00KFD i I NOTES: . ALL UTILITIES THAT ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO 5' OUTSIDE OF BUILDING ARE TO BE CONNECT TO BUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. • ENSURE 18" VERTICAL BETWEEN ALL PROPOSED & EXISTING WATER, STORM, & SANITARY. • TC = TOP BACK OF CURB ELEVATIONS FOR CURB STYLE CATCH BASINS, NOT GUTTER ELEVATIONS 6°NON-PERFORATED SUBDRAIN 176 L.F. @ 0.25 % 6" SUBDRAIN C.O. 1=965.48 NOTE: ALL PROPOSED RCP PIPE SHALL BE TIED. REFER TO MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 3145G FM: CATEGORY III TRM E.O.F. ELEV.=970.50 (SEE DETAIL) \ ,, CONNECT TO 6" NON -PERFORATED SUBDRAIN FM: 12" HDPE FES W/ 8 CY MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON MnDOT TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1,969,00 6" PERFORATED SUBDRAIN (SEE DETAIL) \ , CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #2 \ (HATCH) 6" SUBDRAIN C.O. ti 1=965.67 <-_ 6" NON -PERFORATED SUBDRAIN 1-969.00 TOP = 971.50' 100YR = 971.01' OUTLET = 970.50' BASE = 969.00' v B.M. ELEVATION=982.67 T.N.F.H. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 241 BEHIND THE SOUTH CURB OF ACCESS DRIVE. 0 20 40 60 Scale in Feet I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 16-18393 FILENAME 18393 C2-SITE DRAWN BY JMF DESIGNED BY RJA REVIEWED BY ATB ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/07/18 CLIENT PROJECT NO. --- TITLE SITE UTILITY PLAN SHEET C2.12 CONSTRUCT 28 CY, 6"-30" NATURAL % 1 i �171 l ` STONE RIPRAP ON MNDOT TYPE VII / ' / I / i \° GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (HATCH) t'\---J -)11° I ° CONSTRUCT 9 CY, 6"-30 NATURAL / / f 'l ///�j�J�/� " _� \ \ 1 I ( /�� STONE RIPRAP ON MNDOT TYPE VII / /�/ " ////%//� / GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (HATCH) v % // �/// / _ TVA \ V �� \ II i �W------1:._r589�_ _ //� \ _ \',� o„ �� 96 96 ss2 / /r 1 \ % 1=959.24 (12") 966 955 4 _ I A� / ` �__ _ 8' a5 / 1=959.01 (12") —/967— �� ------,1---- - I1. _ _—M \ �� �/ 968' � \ ,�%� � y v ▪ \ � _ i/ ���// ��/� LMCREEK BUFFER � '� I�—��3 / ��� ��� ,\ a �� -�— ��_� Sip ���� �� � v 165 //// �� \�t\V,��.. � `� \\V1 \I� \ \ \ \ \ CONSTRUCT SWALE \ CHECK DAM, SE DETAIL) \\ \\ p \\ \V1 1 / ) �"'\\A\ \1 I o ) �1 \ \ v 1 �� 1 v � —1:v . \ , E VI \\ I 'I.4 �`� 1'L`7 1I \ I I V \\ \ 11\ I \\ \ \ \1 l \ \�\\ \ \ \\ \ >//2 ?':1 ) \ "X\//I /\y \\ ° / 1 \ \ I \ I�/ / / \ 2• / / \\ \\ / / �\ k'� \ \ //// / V 1 \ y F / / / / \ I' \. /J�1L` .,I sibl \1 075 \ 77 no, i \ ---1=1 \ 17— — \ _ — — — _ 570' 9Jt� _ _ _ - \ SEE SHEET C3.12 FOR -____ — 1711--£8o\ �RETAINING WALL PROFILE \ \ \�O 211 _ \ --987_ 989.. -988 TC=974.30 1=970.90 (12") / TC=974.31 1-970.63 (12") 1=970.63 (12") 990 \ ./",,;,?L / , �fV \ \ $'4,. % \ �� \---_./ / '�'o � \� F&I: CATEGORY III TRM SS //\' E.O.F. ELEV =973.00 (SEE DETAIL) ° �� CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #1(HATCH) (-- — 972 TOP = 973.50' 100YR= 972.00' OUTLET = 970.50 BASE = 969.00' TC=973.91 1=970.38 (12") 1=970.38 (12") RIM=973.00 1=964.50 (12") MAN 9,01.E Olsonp ��o,N v� �\ \ / N O� \'SN�\� \ 'yea\ F&I: CATEGORY III TRM ELEVA71.00 (SEE DETAIL) \ V -- \ \1b .�- \ 3 982 .98 / \ 980 �: b 984_ \ \ \ \ Son CONSTRUCT PRETREATMENT BASIN #2 (HATCH) TOP = 972.00' NWL = 971.00' BASE = 968.00' \ CONSTRUCT PRETREATMENT BASIN#1 (HATCH) TOP = 973.50' NWL = 971.00' BASE = 968.00' 8 CY MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON MnDOT TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC _ o ' 971, 7 . r —s7s_ r4 �= \coo, `ZB>�J`93� NOTE: INDICATES REVERSE PITCH CURB illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll RIM=971.14 1=969.27 (12") \ 972- \ 975 \ \ F&I: CATEGORY III TRM 873y -`74 Unreco SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB / TOP OF TURNED -DOWN WALK SPOT ELEVATION X 0/08, • F&I: CATEGORY III TRM E.O.F. ELEV.=970.50 (SEE DETAIL) \ FLI: III TRM3*NN� 8 CY MnDOT CLASS III RIPRAP ON MnDOT TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE FABRIC \ _972 ` \ 010 ti —,-5onitory S ew r.fe e per Doc. No. 705292265 ` CONSTRUCT FILTRATION BASIN #2 \ (HATCH) TOP = 971.50' 100YR = 971.01' OUTLET = 970.50' BASE = 969.00' \ --;_max � 976- —9774B'\_ -- _ N B.M. ELEVATION=976.30 T.N.F.H. LOCATED 280' NORTH OF INTERSECTION OF SIOUX DRIVE & CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD BEHIND THE EAST CURB OF SIOUX DRIVE 0 20 40 60 Scale in Feet JUST FOR KI FOR K C0-NS RU NO..�� LA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 16-18393 FILENAME 18393 C3-GRADE DRAWN BY JMF DESIGNED BY RJA REVIEWED BY ATB ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/07/18 CLIENT PROJECT NO. --- TITLE SITE GRADING PLAN SHEET C3.11 to V to blo to to to b.o I 'N\o 0 to to I` b.oll sx I \ b.o I to \ I U bV1 11 b.o \ I r b.oIlb.o` \I o bo� o Ir 1 I bid b.o, I \ \�1 b11 I � I \ C.1 I b.1 o \ o Too $.o -o.o .. .0.1 o b.o b.o b.o o.1 0.1 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 15.0 b.0 0.0 13.0 0, 0�2. 0.3 F\ 0.3 b b.o b J b- b-J i;-J /I o to b.o bo �b.o b.o b.o b.o to b.o o b.o / / / b.o bi b o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o '6.07 b.o yo b.o b.o o W/ / //� o b.o b.o b.o b.o j.o 4 b.o ba b.o b.o =_r // V b.o b.o b.o( b.o b.o b.o \ to to b.o bo b.o / \� ba to b.o b.o to\'<ao b.o \b.o b.o b.o O L_ 0.9 j 1.oj o.9 s b.a b.4 b.a ,Gbo b.2 SZ'0 112 0.2 0.2 "93 FBO FBO b.o b.o b.o b.o G b., 0., Ff� b o bo bol.0.o b.o b.� b.o b.o `r0'5.o b.o b.o \ \ y \ b.o \\\ o b.o b.o tic b.F/ V b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o ba b., o b.o b.l 3 0.6 1 4 1.6 �- o _ 4 b. 1 iz 1.3 -1.8- o b.o b.o B.o b.o b.o b.o O.o b.o b.o o b.o b.o 0.o 4\ b4 0.50 b nb4 o I _ 1.9_. ?.a �S O.ao_ 0.6 O.e b.s h.6 b 05.2 h.3 bA bA OA b.a Provide light fixtures as shown on Fixture Schedule. Substitutions shall have prior approval by the Project Engineer before hid date. Being listed as an acceptable Manufacturer in no way relieves the Contractors obligation to provide all equipment and features in accordance with these specifications. LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE STYLE MANUFACTURER/MODEL NUMBER LAMPS. REMARKS AA SITE POLE SINGLE HEAD CREE LIGHTING / SEE SITE PLAN FOR BASE DETAIL POLE (1) #PS4S29R1SV 29'-0" POLE HEAD(S) (1) ARE -EDG-4M-DA-06-E-UL-SV-700-40K 134W LED 9" ARM MOUNT STANDARD BB SITE POLE DOUBLE HEAD ©180 CREE LIGHTING / SEE SITE PLAN FOR BASE DETAIL POLE (1) #PS4S29R1SV 29'-0" POLE HEADS) (2) ARE -EDG-4M-DA-O6-E-UL-SV-700-40K 134W LED 9" ARM MOUNT STANDARD 0 SO b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.0 b.0 0.0 b.o b.o b.o b. b.o b.o b.o O 0.0 O.o o.o b.0 o.o 0 0.0 `0.0 O.o S.o b.o b.0 0.0 =.. 0.0 0.0 • \b., bo bo 00 cps,. % b.1 b.l \ \ \G b\1\ 0.1 Q1, 0.1 lb \\ \ \ 0.2 IN 0.1 0.1 \ S.1 \\ rO 1.5 1.6 1,5 1.7 1.9 LIGHT POLE SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS 0.0 O.o 0.0 D.o LIGHT POLE DETAIL b.o to to to b.l b1 to 0o .o to b1 b1 to to bo 4 GALVANIZED STEEL ANCHOR BOLTS 3/4"9 CONDUIT 4-#6's VERTICAL W/#4 TIES ® 12" O.C. 24`0 CONCRETE PIER FOOTING j N.T.S. 164,2 01 01 \,0;1 b1 b.o b.o 0.0 b.= b.o \ \ \ 1-4 \\'fg,2 0.1 0.1 b.o t o b.o b.o b o b o \ \ • • \,p.1 b.1 b.1 b6/\ o.o b.o b.o b o b.o b.o • b.1 b.o b.o\\b.o b.o b.o o.o b.o oo \\a C'/\ .1 b.o to to \..11.o o.o b.0 0.o L.o :.o b o • s 0 a.-6 .� 06= `.os.a �+� °.s o.T�j.2 b.2 0.3 b.3 0.3 0.3 0./.2 0.1 b.a U.o b.o bj b. o U,o b.a b.o h.o \ h.o b.o O.a b�q, b.o h.o \ b.a b.o b.a b.o \ b.o b.a h.o F�.= b.o b.o b.a b.o \\b� b.o .o b.o h.a b.o Tka, \ a b.o b.a bo \\ \�// o 13.0 b.a a • s 6.3 b.1 _. _ Rio r. h,e b.Q h.o i ,[cam •- \\ I 0� 5.z -ti.,1 b.o b.a F�.a D.� b.o b.o b.o b. b.o - < y \ tic a' IDA 0.1 b.o h.o b.o b.a' i.+< to h.a to bN\ i \ 11 b.o 0 ho bo b.a b.a h.a .o C.1 1,1 bo b.a FOOTCANDLE LEGEND 0.25 FOOTCANDLE UNE 0.50 FOOTCANDLE UNE 1.00 FOOTCANDLE LINE O.25 Os0 1.00 • N B.M. ELEVATION=982.67 T.N.F.H. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 241 BEHIND THE SOUTH CURB OF ACCESS DRIVE. 0 20 40 60 Scale in Feet Just FORKi ..�� FO K R C0-NS :° NOLA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 16-18393 FILENAME 18393 C6-LIGHTING DRAWN BY JMF DESIGNED BY RJA REVIEWED BY ATB ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/07/16 CLIENT PROJECT NO. --- TITLE SITE LIGHTING PLAN SHEET C6.11 I I / _ 4\ \w, • z= -9s, \� Y965 964 96\ 3 962 � 966-111-111111- /967 �h96E, � 969 \ \ � r97o� ,992 I \ / \n I \\ t ELM CREEK BUFFER I0v 1 \\ ( \\ m m\ ,I \\\ II ( A X to 2_ \/ \ /\ \ z. b I/ I t \ 22 LF OF METAL EDGING 9l� \ (1) Globe Blue Spruce I g5 0 (3) Black Spruce • � 96� I (3) Quaking Aspen 96$ (2) Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn (2) River Birch 971- (6) Bailey Compact American Cranberrybush (2) Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn (15) Shenandoah Switch Grass (7) Prairie Dropseed (1) Globe Blue Spruce 2) Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 8 LF OF METAL EDGING 990 FBO \ F80 989 988 987 9Bg0 \ 985 FBO 984_ /`3 / / v 2'. ) Black Walnut \ \ \ \ \ \ �• \ r//\ 9j4 V, (1) Swamp White Oak ' 0 Pep �FRn_ LEGEND OVERSTORY TREE UNDERSTORY TREE MULTI -STEM TREE +r� i • CONIFEROUS TREE v/er 00 DECIDUOUS SHRUB 0 CONIFEROUS SHRUB rr a PERENNIAL — (8) Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac (4) Autumn Spire Maple PLANT SCHEDULE & DETAILS NOTE REFER TO SHEET L1.12 FOR PLANTING NOTES, DETAILS, AND SCHEDULE. (9) Bailey Compact American Cranberrybush (36) Prairie Dropseed —(1) Autumn Spire Maple \ \ lb\ \ \\ \\ \r ♦ \ • \\ • 7 CENTER PLANTING ISLAND • (2) Shademaster Honeylocust (1) Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn (22) Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac \ \ \ (1) Shademaster Honeylocust --�� � � L 97g • (16) Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 1 (1) Eastern White Pine 11 LF OF METAL EDGING 972 (2) River Birch "\ (1) Black Walnut 9I5 J I (2) American _ Hophombeam (1) Autumn Spire Maple r// \ y6BA66 \\ \ \ \ • (2) Eastern\WbI)e Pine • • (1) Swamp White Oak \ L (3) Black Spruce \ \ \ (1) Autumn Spire Maple (2) Qua Aspen \ \ j (1)EasterrrW t� S>/ (2) Black Spruce -972 __(1) Arnedcan Hophombeam c973_,—(1)Swamp White Oak (2) River Birch - (3)Quaking Aspen — 977 B.M. ELEVATION=982.67 T.N.F.H. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 241 BEHIND THE SOUTH CURB OF ACCESS DRIVE. 0 20 40 60 Scale in Feet Just FOR la C0-NS : FOR° 1401 KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 16-18393 FILENAME 18393 L1-LANDSCAPE DRAWN BY JMF DESIGNED BY RJA REVIEWED BY ATB ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/07/16 CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE PLANTING PLAN SHEET L1.11 PLANT SCHEDULE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT MATURE SIZE OVERSTORY TREES 7 Acer rubrm'Autumn Spire' Autumn Spire Maple 3" CAL B&B 50' Height x 20' Spread 3 Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Shademaster Shademaster® Honeylocust 3" CAL B&B 60' Height x 15' Spread 2 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 3" CAL B&B 60' Height x 60' Spread 3 Ostrya virginiana American Hophornbeam 2.5" CAL B&B 30' Height x 20' Spread 3 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2.5" CAL B&B 50' Height x 40' Spread ORNAMENTAL TREES 5 Crataegus crus-galli var.'inermis' Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn 2" CAL B&B 15' Height 15' Spread 8 Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen 2" CAL B&B 30' Height x 15' Spread 6 Betula nigra River Birch 2" CAL B&B 40' Height x Spread (3 clump) CONIFEROUS TREES 4 Pinus strobus Eastern White Pine 8 HT (3" DBH) B&B 60' Height x 30' Spread 8 Picea mariana Black Spruce 8 HT (3" DBH) B&B 30' Height x 15' Spread DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 57 Rhus aromatica'Gro-Low' Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 12" HT CONT 1.5' Height x 6' Spread 15 Viburnum trilobum'Bailey Compact' Bailey Compact American Cranberry 24" HT CONT 5' Height x 5' Spread CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 2 Picea pungens'Glauca Globosa' Globe Blue Spruce 24" HT CONT 4' Height x 5' Spread PERENNIALS 43 Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed 12" HT CONT 2.5' Height x 2.5' Spread 15 Panicum virgatum 'Shenandoah' Shenandoah Switch Grass 12" HT CONT 3.5' Height x 2' Spread GENERAL PLANTING NOTES 1. COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES (LINES, DUCTS, CONDUITS, SLEEVES, FOOTINGS, ETC.) WITH LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS (FENCE, FOOTINGS, TREE ROOTBALLS, ETC.). CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK. 2. SAVE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES NOT NOTED TO BE REMOVED. 3. REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND MATERIALS INJURIOUSTO PLANT GROWTH FROM PLANTING PITS AND BEDS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING WITH PLANTING MIX. 4. LAWN AREAS SHALL HAVE 6" MINIMUM DEPTH OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 85% MAXIMUM DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. 5. REFER TO PLANTING DETAILS PLAN FOR AMENDED SOIL DEPTH IN PLANTING BEDS AND SURROUNDING TREES. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR MIX TYPE. 6. FIELD STAKE PLANTINGS ACCORDING TO PLAN. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE ALL PLANT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE PLANTING LAYOUT AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. 7. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE TRUE TO THEIR SCIENTIFIC NAME AND SIZE AS INDICATED IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE. 8. IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS DRAWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS IN THE SCHEDULE, THE PLANTING PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 9. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE QUANTITIES TO SUIT BUDGET LIMITATIONS. CONTRACTOR'S UNIT BID PRICES SHALL PREVAIL FOR ANY CHANGES IN QUANTITIES. 10. ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE MADE WITH PLANTS OF EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT, BRANCHING HABIT, FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, FRUIT AND CULTURE, AND ONLY AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND OWNER. 11. ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK (A.N.S.I.), LATEST EDITION PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANT MATERIALS OF THE SPECIES LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCK CONFORMS TO A.N.S.I. 12. PROVIDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, NATURAL COLOR, IN ALL PLANTING BEDS AND A MINIMUM 2' DIAMETER SURROUNDING ALL PROPOSED TREES TO A 3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH. APPLY PRE -EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO MULCHING. 13. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE IN A LIVE AND HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION FOR ONE FULL GROWING SEASON (ONE YEAR) AFTER FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE OR SHALL BE REPLACED FREE OF CHARGE WITH THE SAME GRADE AND SPECIES. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE A STRONG CENTRAL LEADER. 14. PLANTING BED EDGING SHALL BE 1/8"x4" STEEL EDGING w/ 12" LANDSCAPE SPIKE IN ALL AREAS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS LAWN AREAS. 15. ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE SPADE DUG EDGES, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED OTHERWISE. 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO OPERATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE CONTRACT LIMIT LINE. ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 17. ALL TURF AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SODDED. CITY TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS PER CITY ORDINANCE SECTION SECTION 838.5.03 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE APPLIED: (1) OVERSTORY / CONIFEROUS TREE PER 50 FEET OF PERIMETER, 1500 LF PERIMETER = 30 OVERSTORY TREES REQUIRED (1) ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 FEET OF PERIMETER, 1500 LF PERIMETER = 15 ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED (1) SHRUB PER 30 FEET OF PERIMETER, 1500 LF PERIMETER = 50 SHRUBS REQUIRED PER CITY ORDINANCE SECTION 828.41 TREE PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE APPLIED: 15 % OF TREES MAY BE REMOVED AND REPLACEMENT SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED A TREE REPLACEMENT RATIO OF 1 CALIPER INCH REMOVED WILL BE REPLACED WITH 1 CALIPER INCH MINIMUM REPLACEMENT TREE SIZED: 2.5" CAL. FOR OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS, 2" CAL. FOR ORNAMENTAL DECIDUOUS & 6' HEIGHT FOR CONIFEROUS TREES REPLACEMENT TREES MUST BE SPECIES DEFINED IN SECTION 828.41 TREE PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT SUBDIVISION 10 OF THE CITY CODE. EXISTING TREE INVENTORY • THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 20 SIGNIFICANT TREES ON SITE 11 TREES ARE BEING REMOVED (138 DBH), 3 OF WHICH ARE DISEASED OR EXEMPT (32 DBH) AND CAN BE SUBTRACTED FROM THE REQUIREMENTS. 15 % OF 18 TREES = 2 (44 DBH), WHICH CAN BE SUBTRACTED FROM THE REQUIREMENTS. 7 TREES OR A DBH OF 62 INCHES, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, IS REQUIRED TO MEET THE CITY'S TREE REPLACEMENT CODE. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING THE FOLLOWING PLANTINGS ARE BEING PROPOSED, WHICH MEETS AND/OR EXCEED THE CITY'S REQUIREMENTS: 30 OVERSTORY/CONIFEROUS TREES • 19 ORNAMENTAL TREES 74 SHRUBS 45 TOTAL TREES = 111 DBH TREE PLANTING NOTES AFTER INSTALLATION TRIM OUT DEADWOOD AND/OR DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT LEADER FLARE, SET AT 1"-2" ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. SEE NOTE ABOVE DIG THE PLANTING PIT TWO TO THREE TIMES WIDER THAN THE SIZE OF THE ROOTBALL AND AT THE SAME DEPTH AT WHICH THEY GREW IN THE NURSERY. SCARIFY THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE PLANTING PIT. UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH - 3" DEPTH OVER PRE -EMERGENT WEED CONTROL GRANUALS DIG THE PLANTING PIT TWO TO THREE TIMES WIDER THAN THE SIZE OF THE ROOTBALL AND AT THE SAME DEPTH AT WHICH THEY GREW IN THE NURSERY. SCARIFY THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE PLANTING PIT. STEEL EDGING e' X 4" 1. PRIOR TO DELIVERY TO THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE THE BUTTRESS ROOTS OR TRUNK FLARE OF EACH TREE. IF FLARE IS LOCATED MORE THAN 2" DOWN FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THE TREE IS REJECTED AND SHALL NOT BE DELIVERED TO THE SITE. 2. ONCE THE PROPERLY GROWN TREE IS DELIVERED TO THE SITE, MEASURE DISTANCE BETWEEN TOP OF THE BUTTRESS ROOTS AND THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOTBALL. SUBTRACT 2" TO DETERMINE DEPTH OF PLANTING PIT. 3. DIG PIT TO DEPTH DETERMINED ABOVE. PIT SHALL BE DISHED WITH SIDEWALLS AS SHOWN BELOW. SCARIFY WALLS AND BOTTOM OF PIT. 4. SET TREE IN PIT SO THAT THE FLARE IS ONE-TWO INCHES ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. IN ALL AREAS WITH HEAVY CLAY OR POORLY DRAINED SOILS (MOTTLING), CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TREE MAY BE RELOCATED OR THE ROOTBALL FURTHER ELEVATED. 5. REMOVE ANY SOIL FROM TOP OF ROOTBALL TO EXPOSE TOP OF FLARE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY TREE UNLESS THE FLARE IS VISIBLE. 6. BACKFILL PLANTING PIT TO WITHIN 12" OF GRADE AND THOROUGHLY WATER. 7. REMOVE BURLAP, WIRE, AND ALL ROPE FROM THE TOP 12" OF THE ROOTBALL 8. BACKFILL TO THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL 9. DO NOT CREATE WATERING RING 10. CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO INSPECT PLANTING PRIOR TO PLACING ANY MULCH OVER THE ROOT BALL. 111E111=111=1 1=111E111-11 h - 1-H Ed i -1 I 1=1 =7 ETIEME111- 1 111E-111-1111 1 _-III ;III -III; DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS 1= 1- UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE I' B&B 2' (MIN) TO PAVED SURFACE i=-111,- 11=111=1 _ J1 11111 F1 /III �IIII I III III,IIIIIIll111i CONTAINER SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL: NTS CONTAINER GROWN TREES 1. LOCATE BUTTRESS ROOTS (SEE NOTES ABOVE). 2. REMOVE EXCESS SOIL FROM TOP OF ROOT BALL TO EXPOSE TRUNK FLARE. MEASURE DEPTH OF ROOTBALL TO DETERMINE DEPTH OF PLANTING PIT. 3. TO ELIMINATE ENCIRCLING ROOTS, MAKE SEVERAL VERTICAL SLITS AROUND PERIMETER OF ROOT MASS FROM TOP TO BOTTOM OF THE ROOTBALL. DEPTH OF SLITS INTO THE ROOTBALL SHALL BE AT LEAST 2". TREES WITH BE REJECTED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: -POOR FORM -DAMAGED TRUNK -BURIED ROOT FLARES -ENCIRCLING TRANSPORT ROOTS -UNCONSOLIDATED ROOTBALL SOIL (DUE TO EXCESSIVE HANDLING) SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH - 3" DEPTH X 3 FT DIAMETER. PULL AWAY FROM TRUNK OF TREE. DO NOT PLACE MULCH UNTIL TREE HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. BACKFILL WITH 112 NATIVE SOILS AND 1/2 PLANTING SOIL. MIX THOROUGHLY PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. AFTER SETTING ROOT BALL IN PIT, BACKFILL TO WITHIN 12" OF TOP OF ROOTBALL AND SATURATE WITH WATER. • CUT AND REMOVE TO BACKFILL LINE ALL TWINE, WIRE AND/OR BURLAP. • BACKFILL UNTIL PIT IS FULL, WATER AGAIN. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PLACING MULCH AROUND THE TREE PLANTINGS. INSTALLATION NOTES: 1. REMOVE CONTAINER (BY CUTTING IF NCCCESARY) 2. IF ROOTS ARE GROWING IN A SPIRAL AROUND THE SOIL MASS, USE A SHARP KNIFE TO SCORE THE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS VERTICALLY, JUST DEEP ENOUGH TO CUT THE NET OF THE ROOTS, AND MAKE A CRISS-CROSS CUT ACROSS THE BOTTOM OF THE SOIL MASS. 3. BACKFILL PLANTING BED WITH ORIGINAL SOIL. BREAK UP CLODS OF SOIL. IF SOILS ARE POOR (IE: HEAVY CLAYS, SAND, OR COMPACTED), BACKFILL CAN BE A MIXTURE OF 1/3 SOIL AMENDMENT WITH 2/3 ORIGINAL SOIL. DO NOT USE PEAT AS PART OF BACKFILL IN CLAY SOILS. REMOVE ALL ROCKS AND DEBRIS FROM BACKFILL. 4. THOROUGHLY WATER TO SETTLE THE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS WITHIN TWO HOURS OF PLANTING. INSTALL MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF WATERING. LAWN ORGROUNDCOVER STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGING? x 4" WOOD MULCH -III-IIII= I -_ STEEL EDGING DETAIL: NTS STAKING GUY ASSEMBLY: 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) 1-1/2" WIDE STRIP- (TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKES OR SIGN POSTS @ 120 DEG. O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM). CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE TREES ONLY IF THE TREE(S) BEGIN TO LEAN WITHIN THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE UNIFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY LINES AND STAKES. TOPSOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE 12" STEEL STAKE STAKING DIAGRAM JUST FOR KI FOR ��NS RUGj` 1401 KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 16-18393 FILENAME 18393 L1-LANDSCAPE DRAWN BY JMF DESIGNED BY RJA REVIEWED BY ATB ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/07/16 CLIENT PROJECT NO. --- TITLE LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND NOTES SHEET L1.12 \ ;I i �� \��� 11� I °2' 1 \ \ \\ r \ 2,-._ \- 6 ° T ' 9/ /I 9B4 9636`_ \ 96g 1967_96�� \,,,, � _ t-970_ \ \ 1 \ / \s7/ gyp° ` vNA ` 9Jp� --\ \, \ \ \ 192 v \I\� s�6 v _ + + .�\+ \� + + + ELM CREEK BUFFER / 55`g59 AREA TO BE SODDED (TYP) _ `989k \s88 -9860, SOD NATIVE SEED, TYPE 1 (DRY MIX) NATIVE SEED, TYPE 2 (WET MIX) °° o v0,01, 0°:°oQ °v°o°o °o a °o o a °po 1o� vvv v°v vvvv°vvo.,jmuy aJv v �vv vv�v vvvvavvo vd, 1 `— AREA TO BE SODDED (TYP) - �Fe TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL & STABILIZATION NOTE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES, INCLUDING EROSION CONTROL FENCE, INLET PROTECTION, ETC. MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FINAL SEEDING AND STABILIZATION MEASURES ARE IN PLACE AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. REFER TO SHEET C4.11 - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. AREA TO BE NATIVE SEED (TYPE 2, WET MIX) 9'. N J� �\�m � \\ , , \ \ \\� \ \ AREA TO BE NATIVE 96s \ \ SEED (TYPE 1, DRY MIX) _\ 4 + \ \ C_"N \ + + + V v/� S� + + + + v ,o v � + + N. ------ + + \ 9,+\ +\++ +. \ N. N. + + \ \ \ \ �N. o_ ____c). / AREA TO BE NATIVE x SEED (TYPE 2, WET MIX) \ 404+---+- e +- t + + + :SEQUENCE OF CONST U IOr T I It G CF EF.1P INSTALLATION IY COnS LI4",:era ti 'eh?ro Or. G. Sediment Control per tte Sift FP a t tlw OpfSat9r5 erdocel Control Supeowor oertifiesh proper installatonCf emp.$ and:a chain of responsibility for SWPPP implementation is created for all operators on the site. Perimeter seAmem Coirols (silt fence. Inlet Protection, COnStrUdtron entrante.S, etc) shall be installed poor to the start Of construction. These practices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization is achiead Operator shall implement the necessary on Site BMP'S in acc.d3rce with the NPCFE permit regurement% to preent nuiaanceconditinnsrMN Rues 050 " 010) Um any die/MODEM under coverage of Ire NPCES pernn. In some cases, mtltiple or redundant applications of some BMP's may be needed to meet these requremeantS. Temporary stabrlizatron BMPs shall only to implemented ohen permanent staod¢etian BMPs cannot be implemented within the 7 day trmetrame rcr eipoond was All dlstrobed arm withn 50 Met of Elm Coach shell hale redonjart BMPS installed and functional poor to the end or each rid* day. JUST FOR KI .� FOR C014 W R KEY NOL� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Andrew T. Brandel DATE LIC NO 47 078 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO MEDINA AREA TO BE NATIVE SEED (TYPE 2, WET MIX) \ \ \9 99 MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 16-18393 \ ig 3\ FILE NAME 18393 Lt-LANDSCAPE DRAWN BY JMF V DESIGNED BY RJA + + +' f 97s +T+T+ V+`+'-0= =76 + + +- + + a- + + + +++ + N- +\+ + +��r�+ + + 8� B.M. ELEVATION=982.67 T.N.F.H. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, AUDITOR'S SUBDMSION NO. 241 BEHIND THE SOUTH CURB OF ACCESS DRIVE. Scale in Feet • ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/07/16 CLIENT PROJECT NO. --- TITLE SHEET RESTORATION PLAN METAL CAP FLASHING PRECAST CONCRETE FINISH #2 BRICK COLUMNS BRICK, DOUBLE SOLDIER COURSE PRECAST CONCRETE FINISH #2 01SOUTH ELEVATION -PHASE 1 & 2 1/8" = 1'-0" METAL CAP FLASHING EIFS �- SIGNAGE LIGHTING SIGNAGE EIFS COLUMNS BRICK BRICK, DOUBLE SOLDIER COURSE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT CONCRETE ONORTH ELEVATION - PHASE 1 2 1/8" = 1,-0„ BUILDING LIGHTING METAL CAP FLASHING T.O. WALL @ STUDIO 120' - 0" PRECAST CONCRETE. FINISH #2 BRICK COLUMNS BRICK, DOUBLE SOLDIER COURSE PRECAST CONCRETE, FINISH#1 PRECAST CONCRETE, FINISH #2 AkFIRST FLOOR _ 100' - 0" Lk RECESSED STUDIO FLOOR 99' - 9 7/8" Lk TOP OF FOOTING 96' - 0" O3 WEST ELEVATION - PHASE 1 1/8" = 1,-0„ PROPOSED ELEVATIONS - PHASE I MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN SIGNAGE ALUMINUM WINDOWS METAL CANOPY MECHANICAL - EQUIPMENT SCREEN \ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BUILDING BUILDING LIGHTING LIGHTING SIGNAGE LIGHTING BUILDING LIGHTING - ALUMINUM WINDOWS METAL CANOPY SIGNAGE \ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL CAP FLASHING EIFS J EIFS COLUMNS BRICK BRICK, DOUBLE SOLDIER COURSE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT PRECAST CONCRETE, FINISH #� SIGLSGE LIGHTING METAL CAP FLASHING SIGNAGE EIFS -- T.O. WALL @_SI-Kpik 124' - 4" T.O. WALL fad STUDIO n 120'-00"" 1 EIFS COLUMNS BRICK BRICK, DOUBLE SOLDIER COURSE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT CONCRETE FIRST FLOOR n 100' RECESSED V RECESSED STUDIO FLOOR AL 99' - 9 7/8" TOP OF FOOTING App 96' - 0" AF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT METAL CAP FLASHING SCREEN SCUPPER AND BUILDING LIGHTING DOWNSPOUT OEAST ELEVATION - PHASE 1 4 1/8" = 1,-0" BUILDING LIGHTINC- SIGNAGE LIGHTING T.O. WALL @_SHOP n 124'-44"" 7 T.O. WALL fa STUDIO n 120'-00"" PRECAST CONCRETE FINISH #2 BRICK COLUMNS BRICK, DOUBLE SOLDIER COURSE ALUMINUM WINDOWS PRECAST CONCRETE FINISH #2 FIRST FLOOR A 100' - 0" 74 RECESSED STUDIO FLOOR AL 99' - 9 7/8" TOP OF FOOTING AL 96' - 0" METAL CAP FLASHING T.O. WALL @@SHOP n 124' 44"" T.O. WALL p STUDIO n 120'-00"" PRECAST CONCRETE, FINISH #2 BRICK COLUMNS BRICK DOUBLE SOLDIER COURSE PRECAST CONCRETE, FINISH#1 PRECAST CONCRETE, FINISH #2 FIRST FLOOR /1 100' - 0" 11 \RECESSED STUDIO FLOOR Ac 99' - 9 7/8" TOP OF FOOTING AL 96' - 0" ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.ls-grp.com JUST FOR KIX - DANCE STUDIO Medina, MN - 15-18393 -June 2016 METAL CAP FLASHING EIFS SIGNAGE LIG SIC EIFS CO BRICK, D SOLDIER CI ALUMINUM STORE CON 1 BUILDING LIGHTING SIGNAGE LIGHTING SIGNAGE SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN BUILDING LIGHTING METAL CAP FLASHING HI INI3- T. ;NAGE� BRICK JUBLE IURSE :RETE - ^I' It � 1 PREI Min= P FOR' I n! - ' BF BRIC / 1 / 1 ,.' �� SBRIC OLI - ,. ■ .. . ALIO A. PRE; FINI: $' - '' - BUILDING LIGHTING METAL CAP FLASHING WALL (tD STUDI( v 120'-0" PRECAST CONCR FINIS BRICK COLU BRICK, DOUBLE SOLI COL PRECAST CONCR FINI: PRECAST CONCR FINI gAikRST FLOOR 0" poi RECESSED STUDIO FLOOR / 99' - 9 7/8" WTOP OF FOOTING 96' - 0" ONORTH ELEVATION - PHASE 2 1/8" = 1'-0" ALUMINUM STOREFRONT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN ETE, H E. .111 MNS ALUMIN JIER RSE METAL ETE, ETE, LH#1 Illinll H #2 O2 WEST ELEVATION - PHASE 2 -its =1,_0„ METAL CAP FLASHING EIFS I EIFS COLUMNS BRICK BRICK, DOUBLE SOLDIER COURSE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT PRECAST CONCRETE, FINISH #2 - PROPOSED ELEVATIONS - PHASE 2 - BUILDING LIGHTING O3 EAST ELEVATION - PHASE 2 1/8" = 1,-0„ SIGNAGE LIGHTING - SIGNAGE UM WINDOWS CANOPY MECHANICAL METAL CAP FLASHING EQUIPMENT SCREEN - T.O. WALL tlgi SHOP n 124�' - 4" T.O_WALL @ STUDIO n 120'-00"" 1 METAL CONCRETE, FINISH #2 1 BRICK COLUMNS BRICK, DOUBLE SOLDIER COURSE PRECAST CONCRETE, FINISH#1 PRECAST CONCRETE, FINISH #2 FIRST FLOOR n 100'0" -V RECESSED STUDIO FLOOR Apik 99' - 9 7/8" TOP OF FOOTING AL 96' - 0" T.O. WALL @_SHOP n 124'-44"" 7 O_WALL @ STUDIO 120' ;AST CONCRETE H #2 K COLUMNS K, DOUBLE )IER COURSE AINUM WINDOWS :AST CONCRETE H #2 FIRST FLOOR n 100'-00"" RECESSED STUDIO FLOOR AL 99' - 9 7/8" \TOP OF FOOTING AL 96' - 0" ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.Is-grp.com JUST FOR KIX - DANCE STUDIO Medina, MN - 15-18393 -June 2016 -.-441,44444.44,„id.Auor ;1,04- 400;, 3D PERSPECTIVE ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.is-grp.com JUST FOR KIX - DANCE STUDIO Medina, MN - 15-18393- June 2016 SHEET NOTES ALL TRASH RECEPTACLES TO BE PLACED INSIDE BUILDING, CONSULT WITH OWNER FOR LOCATIONS. KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 MIRROR AND RAILING. BY OWNER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 2 DOWNSPOUT AND SPLASHBLOCK. 5 VENDING MACHINE, BY OTHERS. 8 MOP STRIP. 9 OPERABLE PARTITION WALL 10 BENCH AND COAT RACK 11 ELECTRIC WATER COOLER, REFER TO MECHANICAL DOCUMENTS. 12 BENCH, 18. DEEP. 13 ADA BENCH, 20" DEEP. 14 SHOWER CURTAIN AND ROD. I 2 185'-8" 59'-4" j 31•_8" 58•-0, 35'-8, 0} 8" 6-8" 6®-8" 6'-8 6W2 0'-82' -8" I 128 4 ^ ' ' ' © Illi © SIIMR 1 =� A5.11 '_t ® g l li® -- 10'-1" -L/,\ ` �l I : B1 10'-1" n 1 O iO VIEWINGID CI ! �. m I I 105 I I - L N lab. ^\ � n ID- it Wt ABOVE L — — — a — II-. i - STUDIO a STUDIO ,- NB.f 104 I _ I 13 ®! .m' I I ®I I A6.12 12 I113C I 106 I STORAGE 113 SPRINKLER [FEC 13/3 RISER f ` m i� ® _ o FEC I i'1-- ��� I FEC ®-0, ®8_0, ® ryP O —a- m r ) 5.-0. CO11�_q, — — — — — �o __::-. 1 BR ROOM — � 00O - O ��������II���, I��i�' — 8=0, Nib Ts I ® 1 l. li r®'-i� 7 A6.12 CEP _ ,1 8 WOMEN I 109 I Q STORAGE / m 107 I I11. '1 • JANITOR FD I 110 I I- l•1 4-F0❑ ` A6.12 5 ,F%1p Q"® ,... 1 TOILET _ __ - 21 O � I-- T 112 r MOVE U - ( 1 �� RPMEMe MENI O 613 111 22 - a' W5 ENTRY I 101 I T �.O m FEC 11 CORRIDOR r J m STUDIO 'L —9, _q'� —9_e• —7,-8'� 8'-0, 8'-0'� —fi'_4' 11 `O y Wi 103 r CI) 8" 3'-4" t0 1'-8" 3 4 :" 4'-0"+3'-4"+ 3 4"+ 4' 8" 0" I �' MB I a 8"j 1 ,, - 1 O �l �,� u ®I ® — O ABOVE I a FEC tr I •MEN -- ©> Y. MEC® I i ® MB OFFICE r j n 7 MEN - 1 116 1 �'' 115 ME a i� o ELEC I VEST STORAGE 118 1 �� ■\ ^ "a i • �i X n • I•V M— 1 m I� B1 10' 1" r1 1 ! 61 io• i" '-- Bc 10. 1" 102 I 100 I ® I� 1 , �\ i� --- 3 II I �Q oo . V =1 — _ J J� J ,� ..41 �� I_ _e�egsrs- J I•T ® _ J �I O 1 .111 Wz ® ® © © wz —\ 2 A5.11 C A7.59 b 7_8' i6'_0' A" 12'-0" 9'-4" 6-8" i 13'-<" 6' 8" 24'-0" 7I 11 OFIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/6" = 1'-0" NOS FR CONS RO004. Oj\ON O KEY PLAN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE LIC NO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JEREMY P. WIESEN DATE 06/07/2016 LIC NO 49451 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT JUST FOR KIX DANCE STUDIO MEDINA MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE NO DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 15-16393 FILE NAME 18393 Arch R18.M DRAWN BY TCK DESIGNED BY TCK REVIEWED BY JCW ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 06/07/2016 CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHEET A1.21 6I27I2010.621 PM MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: June 29, 2016 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates — July 5, 2016 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) Just for Kix Site Plan Review, Variance, Lot Combination —45 Highway SS — Just for Kix has requested approval of a Site Plan Review for construction of an 18,040 square foot building to include a dance studio and retail. The applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum hardcover in the Elm Creek shoreland overlay district from 25% to 50% and also a lot combination to combine the property annexed from the City of Plymouth. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the June 14 meeting. They recommended approval but requested additional architectural modulation. The City Council is scheduled to review on July 5. B) Jeffrey -Johnson Lot Line Rearrangement and Easement Vacation — 2605 and 2505 Willow Drive — Glenn Jeffrey has requested approval of a rearrangement of the lot line between his and his neighbor's property. The Jeffrey's propane tank is located on the Johnson property. The applicant has also requested to vacate easements adjacent to the lot lines and replace with new easements. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and will present to Council when ready, potentially at the July 5 meeting. C) AutoMotorPlex Concept Plan — east of Arrowhead Drive, north of Hamel Road — Bruno Silikowski has requested review of Concept Plan for construction of approximately 215,000 square feet of private garage condominiums for motorsports enthusiasts. The Planning Commission is scheduled to review at the July 12 meeting. D) Deer Hill Preserve (Stonegate Farms) Final Plat — Property Resources Development Company has requested final plat approval for the Deer Hill Preserve CD-PUD subdivision, formerly known as Stonegate Farms. The first phase of the development is proposed to include 10 lots in the northeast corner of the site, near the current termination of Deerhill Road. The City Council granted approval at the June 21 meeting. Staff will work with applicant on the conditions of approval before construction begins E) Excelsior Group Concept Plan —2120 and 2212 Chippewa Road — The Excelsior Group has requested review of a Concept Plan for development of 87 single family lots west of the proposed Wealshire site. The property is not within the current Staging period and the applicant seeks flexibility to jump ahead one period. The Planning Commission provided comments at the June 14 meeting and the Council at the June 21 meeting. The project will now be closed. F) LeJuene Lot Line Rearrangement — 2782 and 2820 County Road 24 — Larry and Jean LeJeune have requested approval of a rearrangement of lot lines between two parcels they own. The Council granted approval at the June 21 meeting. The applicant is recording the documents at Hennepin County and the project will now be closed. G) Wealshire LLC Comp Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Site Plan Review — Wealshire, LLC has requested a site plan review for construction of a 173,000 sf memory care facility. The request also includes a rezoning from RR-UR to Business Park. The Met Council has also approved of the previous Comp Plan amendment. The City Council granted approval at the May 3 meeting. Construction is now underway and the project will be closed. H) Hamel Brewery, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery, Wright -Hennepin Solar Panels —The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 July 5, 2016 City Council Meeting I) Woods of Medina, Capital Knoll— These preliminary plats have been approved and staff is awaiting a final plat application J) Bradford Creek, Hamel Haven, Buehler subdivisions — These subdivisions have received final approval. Staff is working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before construction begins Other Proiects A) Comprehensive Plan — The Steering Committee appointed a Housing subgroup to finalize a draft of the Housing chapter. Staff intends to present a draft of the Park/Trail/Open Space plan to the Park Commission on July 20. A concurrent City Council/Planning Commission meeting is planned for August 3 to review rough draft of the Vision/Goal, Land Use, and Housing chapters. B) Cable Expansion Analysis — Planning staff continued assistance with the analysis related to proposed cable construction for 2016. C) Temporary Family Healthcare Dwellings — staff has reviewed information related to recent statute changes which would preempt local controls related to mobile housing for family members being cared for by residents of a home. The statute allows a city to "opt -out" from the state preemption. Staff intends to present information on the subject, including an ordinance which would opt out of the regulations, to the Planning Commission at their July 12 meeting. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 July 5, 2016 City Council Meeting MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina, MN 55340.9790 p: 763.473-9209 f: 763.473-8858 non -emergency: 763-525-6210 MEMORANDUM Emergency 9.1_1 TO: City Administrator Scott Johnson and City Council FROM: Director Edgar J. Belland DATE: June 29, 2016 RE: Department Updates All Day Training On June 27th we held our annual all day training session at the Annandale Shoot House. We trained with the Corcoran Police Department officers. We covered all our mandatory use of force topics and worked with scenario based situations. Steve Anderson, a use of force instructor, came in and did an excellent job on working on the fundamentals of defensive tactic. The scenarios were put together by Sergeant Nelson and Officers Boecker and McGill. It was great training for all of us. CSO Brandon Wenande Hired by Wright County Sheriff s Office. I congratulate Brandon on being hired as a licensed deputy for the Wright County Sheriff's Office. His start date is July 18th. Brandon has been with us for over two years doing an excellent job for us. I am sure he will be successful as he takes on his new responsibilities. We will miss him; our CSO program continues to prepare young perspective officers for their next step in their careers. At the next council meeting, I will be requesting permission to start a hiring process for our next CSO. Lunch with Past Medina Police Officers On June 17th we held a reunion lunch at the police department for retired officers. We had Bud Eisinger who was an elected constable from 1958 to 1963, Gerald Reiser who was an officer from 1962 to 1968, and Mike Rouillard who was an officer from 1974 to 2003. It was nice hearing the stories and how the Medina Police Department started. We are planning on putting some historic photos and stories up for display in our training room. Hamel Fire Training On June 27, 2016, I attended the Hamel Fire Departments live burn training. The training was held at the Medina Police and Public Works Facility. Hamel Fire brought in a burn trailer with a trainer from Maple Lake, Minnesota. The firefighters took turns entering the trailer and extinguishing the fire which reached temperatures of 800 degrees. Patrol by Sergeant Jason Nelson Patrol Activities For the dates of June 14 to June 29, 2016, our officers issued 59 citations and 117 warnings for various traffic infractions. There was a total of one driving while impaired arrest, one traffic accident, five medicals and 14 alarms. On June 19, 2016, Officer Boecker was working a DWI detail when he stopped a car for weaving. The driver was found to have an 11 month old child in the rear seat. The driver was very intoxicated and was arrested. The driver had two other prior convictions for DWI with in the past ten years. On June 20, 2016, Officer Gregory took a theft of a Bobcat skid steer in the 900 block of Hamel Road. The skid steer was taken off a trailer and driven away. Since the date of the report, suspects have been developed by patrol officers. Case forwarded to Investigations. On June 21, 2016, Officer Converse took a theft of medication report. The victim reported that her son's husband had stolen several Oxycodone from her bathroom medicine cabinet. The suspect has since moved out of state. On June 22, 2016, Officer Gregory stopped a vehicle for speed on County Road 24. The driver was found to be in possession of a large amount of marijuana and marijuana wax. The case was forwarded to the drug task force for further follow up. On June 23, 2016, Officers Gregory and Jessen were dispatched to a suspicious male that was looking at heavy equipment at the new townhomes behind the Medina Ballroom. The male was yelled at by residents and fled in a vehicle. Two hours later, the vehicle was again back in the Medina Inn motel lot and officers located the vehicle and its occupants. The occupants didn't have a good reason for being in the area and denied being there two hours prior. Officer Gregory was able to locate three tie downs that were later identified as the missing ones from the theft of the skid steer. All information was forwarded to Investigations. On June 23, 2016, Officer Converse took a theft from auto report. Victim states that he is a lawn care service worker and that someone had stolen his wallet from the work truck. Case forwarded to Investigations. On June 26, 2016, Officers McGill and Boecker were dispatched to a residential area where a 5 year old had been run over by a vehicle backing out of a driveway. Upon arrival, officers located the child who was breathing and conscious. The child had tire marks along his entire back and was in need of immediate medical attention. The child was air lifted. The driver indicated that he was just backing out of his driveway and never saw the child. Criminal Investigations by Investigator Charmane Domino Report of an OFP violation. Petitioner was contacted twice by the person that was not to make contact. Business reported a Bobcat skid steer stolen from a trailer sometime overnight. Possible suspects have been identified and are suspected of numerous thefts in the area. Investigation to continue. Several fraudulent credit card transactions have been reported. The transactions are occurring on cloned cards. Open cases currently under investigation: 12 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: June 28, 2016 MEETING: July 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • The Sioux Drive turn lane project is mostly complete. Striping has been completed and some recon work remains. • We will be back to work on our road projects next week and will likely be starting the reconstruction portion of Cottonwood Trail. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • Well #8 is moving along, with the piping now complete and being pressure tested and disinfected. • The MS4 permit is being finished and sent to the MPCA for approval. • We have been working with the contractor at the Wealshire site to make sure there is very little disruption to Polaris operations when the watermain is hooked up. • The PW crew has been repairing the street around the manholes in the Medina Morningside area, preparing for sealcoating. PARKS/TRAILS • The Arrowhead Trail Project has begun and is moving right along. • We have been working on the design for the parking area at Hamel Legion Park. This project will happen later in the summer when the ball games are slowing down. • Public works has been working at keeping the parks neat and clean. There have been some large tournaments at the four-plex that have needed some after -hour attention such as garbage containers over -full, bathrooms needing attention, etc. Not sure how we will handle this in the future, but it will need to be addressed prior to tournaments being scheduled. • 60 trees were planted at the Fields of Medina Park in the Mattamy Homes Development to fulfil the commitment of trees on the site. We are also working on getting the power installed and working there. • There have been some requests for items at Maple and Walnut parks in the Independence Beach area. I will be bringing them up for discussion at the next Park Commission meeting. MISCELLANEOUS • There was a call after the storm on Wednesday night that a tree on City property in Independence Beach had been downed and another badly damaged. The debris was spread over two different properties located next to that City property. I sent Derek out to clean it up. • I will be on vacation from June 25th until July 5th. Ivan will be returning the day I leave, so everything should be covered while I am gone. ORDER CHECKS JUNE 21, 2016 - JULY 5, 2016 44494 AVE MARIA ACADEMY $150.00 44495 BAUMTROG,JOSEPH/AUDREY $500.00 44496 CENTURYLINK $195.25 44497 DAVID WEEKLEY HOMES $15,000.00 44498 DUAN, DANA $250.00 44499 KHAN, MUHAMMAD $150.00 44500 DAN OR PAM PATNODE $250.00 44501 PERIAKARUPPAN, PAPPU/MUTHU $210.00 44502 RESCHENBERG, THOMAS/MARY $150.00 44503 YABLONSKY, SUSIE $250.00 44504 ALI, MATEEN $700.00 44505 BHATT, DERESH & RASHMI $150.00 44506 COLLODORA, JAMIE $500.00 44507 EMILY DOE $250.00 44508 LAMBERT, PETER $250.00 44509 MCKEVITT, CHRIS/K-LYNN $0.00 44510 PITNEY BOWES $761.88 44511 MCKEVITT, CHRIS/K-LYNN $250.00 44512 292 DESIGN GROUP INC $7,542.10 44513 BUDGET PRINTING $14.67 44514 CONTEMPORARY IMAGES $1,745.92 44515 DPC INDUSTRIES INC $2,297.60 44516 ECM PUBLISHERS INC $151.07 44517 ENGEL WATER TESTING INC $380.00 44518 GRAFIX SHOPPE $1,240.00 44519 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD $4,071.75 44520 HENN CTY RESIDENT/REAL ESTATE $47.00 44521 HOLIDAY FLEET $2,424.19 44522 INDOOR AUTO $985.63 44523 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY $249.75 44524 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED $22,662.84 44525 LARKIN AUTO $728.30 44526 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR $392.00 44527 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC $39.50 44528 CITY OF LONG LAKE $6,315.75 44529 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE $629.15 44530 MARCO INC $29.21 44531 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL $19,681.20 44532 MIDSTATE CRANE SERVICE INC $701.25 44533 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC $18.07 44534 NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INC $2,071.50 44535 OFFICE DEPOT $121.20 44536 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC $7,450.61 44537 SCHMIDT CURB COMPANY INC $4,550.00 44538 SOUTHWEST NEWSMEDIA $124.00 44539 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC $21.65 44540 STREICHER'S $3,943.91 44541 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL $537.90 44542 TEGRETE CORP $1,267.86 44543 TIMESAVER OFFSITE $203.00 44544 WSB & ASSOCIATES $49,658.50 Total Checks $162,264.21 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS JUNE 21, 2016 — JULY 5, 2016 003711E KONICA MINOLTA $168.48 003712E MARCO (LEASE) $1,039.29 003713E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC $219.90 003714E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN $1,863.74 003715E SELECT ACCOUNT $6.04 003716E MINNESOTA, STATE OF $1,175.00 003717E PR PERA $14,194.07 003718E PR FED/FICA $15,612.06 003719E PR MN Deferred Comp $2,360.00 003720E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA $3,180.94 003721E SELECT ACCOUNT $793.12 003722E CITY OF MEDINA $19.00 003723E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $20.00 003724E VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES $156.87 003725E XCEL ENERGY $9,890.95 Total Electronic Checks $50,699.46 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT JUNE 29, 2016 507250 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L $1,314.63 507251 BARNHART, ERIN A. $1,968.17 507252 BELLAND, EDGAR J $2,576.45 507253 BOECKER, KEVIN D. $2,571.79 507254 CONVERSE, KEITH A $1,972.66 507255 DINGMANN, IVAN W $1,533.70 507256 DOMINO, CHARMANE $1,808.51 507257 ENDE, JOSEPH $1,633.49 507258 FINKE, DUSTIN D. $2,132.00 507259 GALLUP, JODI M $1,679.02 507260 GLEASON, JOHN M. $2,111.42 507261 GREGORY, THOMAS $1,839.75 507262 HALL, DAVID M. $2,046.99 507263 JESSEN,JEREMIAH S. $2,134.94 507264 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. $2,288.50 507265 KLAERS, ANNE M $1,290.90 507266 LANE, LINDA $1,550.58 507267 LEUER, GREGORY J. $2,154.90 507268 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R $1,509.39 507269 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D $1,374.25 507270 NELSON, JASON $2,585.18 507271 PETERSON, DEBRA A $1,663.15 507272 REINKING, DEREK M $1,569.50 507273 SCHERER, STEVEN T. $2,307.58 507274 STAPLE, AMANDA $467.45 507275 VIEAU, CECILIA M. $1,151.66 507276 WENANDE, BRANDON S $502.78 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $47,739.34