Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2001-04-09CCAPR - 5 ~ .. ~ : / s-r) CITY OF LYNWOOD ADDENDUM cITY OFF"CE ERS TO THE AGENDA ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION • AT THE MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL ~a~;XC~~ TO BE HELD ON APRIL 9, 2001 ~~'"''"'~~~~ BATEMAN HALL 9:00 A.M. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER ARTURO REYES COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS, 111 ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY ATTORNEY SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY CLERK CITY TREASURER ANDREA L. HOOPER IRIS PYGATT DISCUSSION 1. NEGOTIATE WITH ALLIED GOVERNMENT SERVICES TO ASSIST IN IDENTIFYING AND NEGOTIATING THE TERMS OF DISPLAYING ADVERTISING PROJECTS Comments: Request to hire a consultant to review and make recommendations for unlawfully placed outdoor display advertising. Recommendation: Staff is requesting THE CITY Council to authorize the city manage to negotiate an agreement with Allied Government Services (AGS) to identify opportunities and negotiate the terms of display advertising projects. (Attachment under separate cover) ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn to a Regular Meeting to be held April 17, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON April 9, 2001 BATEMAN HALL 9:00 A. M. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS III CITY CLERK ANDREA L. HOOPER ~!J ~~l ~-' ~v ~'~'.~ :c~1,c;.IV t~ CIN OF LYNVd000 CITY CLERICS OFFICE bar? G S ~~.- rt /~~ 1 / l ARTURO REYES ,~ -- COUNCILMEMBER , . ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY ATTORNEY SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY TREASURER IRIS PYGATT OPENING CEREMONIES CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards, 3. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5.) 4. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTS Comments: On November 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Annual Operating Budget for fiscal year 2000/01. The adopted budget included allocation for: Los Angeles County Fire Services Contract; Implementation of Strategic Plan; New Capital Improvements for water system, street improvements and park improvements, etc. Since the initial budget adoption, staff has determined that budget amendments are needed in divisional accounts to cover increases in operational costs. In addition, adjustments are needed in certain revenue line items to reflect revised year end projections. Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FY 2000/2001". 5. REGULATING FIREWORKS SALE Comments: On February 26, 2001 Special Council Meeting, staff was directed to bring an item to discuss fireworks sale. Staff consulted with the City Attorney relative to the applicable statutes on local government's regulatory discretion on the sale of fireworks. Recommendation: To have the City Council discuss regulating fireworks sale. CLOSED SESSION NONE ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 17, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM, CITY HALL, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. DATE: April 9, 2001 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager BY: Alfretta F. Earnest, Director of Finance & Administration SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTS PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to have the City Council adopt a resolution amending the fiscal year 2000/01 Operating Budget to reflect revised revenue projections and expenditure budget amendment requests. BACKGROUND: On November 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Annual Operating Budget for fiscal year 2000/01. The adopted budget included allocations for: / Los Angeles County Fire Services Contract / Implementation of Strategic Plan / New Capital Improvements for water system, street improvements and park improvements, etc. However, since the initial budget adoption, staff has determined that budget amendments are needed in divisional accounts to cover increases in operational costs. In addition, adjustments are needed in certain revenue line items to reflect revised year end projections. ANALYSIS: The requested budget amendments affect the following funds: FUND # DESCRIPTION AMENDMENT Expenditures: 01 General Fund 1,089,665 02 Water Fund 13,500 03 Traffic Safety Fund 10,100 05 Capital Improvement Fund 320,000 05 Capital Improvement Fund (320,000) 08 Garage Fund 68,000 09 Retirement Fund 16,350 13 Public Finance Authority 150,000 23 Self Insurance Fund 100,000 54 Law Enforcement Blk Grant 10,300 55 COPS Program 226,425 Subtotal 1,684,340 Transfers-Out: 01 General Fund 250,000 09 Retirement Fund 7,000 Subtotal 257,000 4 Revenue: 01-Revenue General Fund 1,191,100 09 Retirement Fund 108,650 25 Business Imp. District 6,850 27 Section 108 Loan 45,000 28 HUD/CDBG 36,769 34 HOME Program 213,319 54 Local Law Enf. Block Grant 271,150 55 COPS Program 150,350 60 Urban Tree Planting Grant 17,058 65 1999 Brownsfield Grant 2,000 Subtotal 2,042,246 Transfers-!n: 01-33009 Trans-In/General Fund 7,000 13-33001 Trans-In/LPFA Fund 150,000 23-33001 Trans-In/Self Insurance 100,000 Subtotal 257,000 RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FY 2000!2001." RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AMENDING THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FY 200012001 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the annual Operating Budget on November 21,2000; and WHEREAS, the budget serves as an allocation plan for cost of services, programs and projects; and WHEREAS, certain budget amendments are being requested to reflect changes in salary, benefits, and travel and meeting expenses. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby find, order and resolve as follows: Section 1. That amendments to the annual Operating Budget for FY 2000/2001 are herby approved. Section 2. that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to make the following budget amendments. DESCRIPTION AMENDMENT Expenditures: $1,089,665 General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 1,089,665 13 500 Water Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 13,500 CIP Unappropriated Fund (320,000) (4313) CIP Fund 320,000 (4312) 10 100 Traffic Safety Unappropriated Fund Balance 10,100 68 000 Garage Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 68,000 16 350 Retirement Fund 16,350 150 000 Public Finance Authority Unappropriated Fund Balance 150,000 100 000 Self-Insurance Unappropriated Fund Balance 100,000 10 300 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant 10,300 226 425 Cops Program 226,425 Transfers-Our 250 000 General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 250,000 7 000 Retirement Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 7,000 Revenue: 01-General Fund 1,191,100 25- Business Improv. District 6.,850 27- Section 108 45,000 28- HUD/CDBG 36,769 34-HOME Program 213,319 54-Local Law Enf. Block Grant 271,150 55-COPS Program 150,350 60-Urban Tree Planting Grant 17,058 65-1999 Browns Field Grant 2,000 Transfers - In: 01 -General 7,000 13 -Public Finance Authority 150,000 23 -Self Insurance 100,000 Subtotal $2,042,246 Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2001. Paul H. Richards II, Mayor ATTEST: Andrea Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Ralph W. Davis III City Manager ~.. E~EIV E W~~ 5 - APR - 5 . I ~ . / ~, . ADDENDUM CITY MANAGE SD OFFICE TO THE AGENDA ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL • TO BE HELD ON APRIL 9, 2001 ~'~'~ ~~?~ BATEMAN HALL 9:00 A.M. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM ARTURO REYES COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS, III LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY ATTORNEY SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY CLERK CITY TREASURER ANDREA L. HOOPER IRIS PYGATT DISCUSSION 1. NEGOTIATE WITH ALLIED GOVERNMENT SERVICES TO ASSIST IN IDENTIFYING AND NEGOTIATING THE TERMS OF DISPLAYING ADVERTISING PROJECTS comments: Request to hire a consultant to review and make recommendations for unlawfully placed outdoor display advertising. Recommendation: Staff is requesting THE CITY Council to authorize the city manage tc negotiate an agreement with Allied Government Services (ACS) to identify opportunities and negotiate the terms of display advertising projects. (Attachment under separate cover) ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn to a Regular Meeting to be held April 17, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. ~. IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON April 9, 2001 BATEMAN HALL 9:00 A.M. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS III CITY CLERK ANDREA L. HOOPER ~~ulv ~v~~'r> CITY OF LYNVJ00~ CITY CLERKS OFFICE ui-R G ~ 7;,,. l-~ ,~ ARTURO REYES COUNCILMEMBER ^ ` ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY ATTORNEY SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY TREASURER IRIS PYGATT OPENING CEREMONIES 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards, II 3. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5.) 4. BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTS Comments: On November 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Annual Operating Budget for fiscal year 2000/01. The adopted budget included allocation for: Los Angeles County Fire Services Contract; Implementation of Strategic Plan; New Capital Improvements for water system, street improvements and park improvements, etc. Since the initial budget adoption, staff has determined that budget amendments are needed in divisional accounts to cover increases in operational costs. In addition, adjustments are needed in certain revenue line items to reflect revised year end projections. Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FY 2000/2001". 5. REGULATING FIREWORKS SALE Comments: On February 26, 2001 Special Council Meeting, staff was directed to bring an item to discuss fireworks sale. Staff consulted with the City Attorney relative to the applicable statutes on local government's regulatory discretion on the sale of fireworks. Recommendation: To have the City Council discuss regulating fireworks sale. CLOSED SESSION NONE ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 17, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM, CITY HALL, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. ~, 10 300 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant 10,300 226 425 Cops Program 226,425 Transfers-Ouar 250 000 General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 250,000 7 000 Retirement Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 7,000 Revenue: 01-General Fund 1,191,100 25- Business Improv. District 6.,850 27- Section 108 45,000 28- HUD/CDBG 36,769 34-HOME Program 213,319 54-Local Law Enf. Block Grant 271,150 55-COPS Program 150,350 60-Urban Tree Planting Grant 17,058 65-1999 Browns Field Grant 2,000 Transfers - In: 01 -General 7,000 13 -Public Finance Authority 150,000 23 -Self Insurance 100.000 Subtotal $2,042,246 Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of .2001. Paul H. Richards II, Mayor ATTEST: Andrea Hooper, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AMENDING THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FY 2000/2001 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the annual Operating Budget on November 21,2000; and WHEREAS, the budget serves as an allocation plan for cost of services, programs and projects; and WHEREAS, certain budget amendments are being requested to reflect changes in salary, benefits, and travel and meeting expenses. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby find, order and resolve as follows: Section 1. That amendments to the annual Operating Budget for FY 2000/2001 are herby approved. Section 2. that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to make the following budget amendments. DESCRIPTION AMENDMENT Expenditures: 1 089 665 General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 1,089,665 13 500 Water Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 13,500 CIP Unappropriated Fund (320,000) (4313) CIP Fund 320,000 (4312) 10 100 Traffic Safety Unappropriated Fund Balance 10,100 68 000 Garage Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance 68,000 16 350 Retirement Fund 16,350 150 000 Public Finance Authority Unappropriated Fund Balance 150,000 100 000 Self-Insurance Unappropriated Fund Balance 100,000 .~ DATE: April 9, 2001 TO: FROM: BY: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager Alfretta F. Earnest, Director of Finance & Administration SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTS PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to have the City Council adopt a resolution amending the fiscal year 2000/01 Operating Budget to reflect revised revenue projections and expenditure budget amendment requests. BACKGROUND: On November 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Annual Operating Budget for fiscal year 2000/01. The adopted budget included allocations for: / Los Angeles County Fire Services Contract / Implementation of Strategic Plan / New Capital Improvements for water system, street improvements and park improvements, etc. However, since the initial budget adoption, staff has determined that budget amendments are needed in divisional accounts to cover increases in operational costs. In addition, adjustments are needed in certain revenue line items to reflect revised year end projections. ANALYSIS: The requested budget amendments affect the following funds: FUND # DESCRIPTION Expenditures: 01 General Fund 02 Water Fund 03 Traffic Safety Fund 05 Capital Improvement Fund 05 Capital Improvement Fund 08 Garage Fund 09 Retirement Fund 13 Public Finance Authority 23 Self Insurance Fund 54 Law Enforcement Blk Grant 55 COPS Program Subtotal Transfers-Out: 01 General Fund 09 Retirement Fund Subtotal AMENDMENT 1,089,665 13, 500 10,100 320,000 (320,000) 68,000 16,350 150,000 100,000 10,300 226.425 1,684,340 250,000 7,000 257,000 4 Revenue: 01-Revenue General Fund 1,191,100 09 Retirement Fund 108,650 25 Business Imp. District 6,850 27 Section 108 Loan 45,000 28 HUD/CDBG 36,769 34 HOME Program 213,319 54 Local Law Enf. Block Grant 271,150 55 COPS Program 150,350 60 Urban Tree Planting Grant 17,058 65 1999 Brownsfield Grant 2,000 Subtotal 2,042,246 Transfers-In: 01-33009 Trans-In/General Fund 7,000 13-33001 Trans-In/LPFA Fund 150,000 23-33001 Trans-In/Self Insurance 100,000 Subtotal 257,000 RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FY 200012001." APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: City Attorney Ralph W. Davis III City Manager DATE: April 9, 2001 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis,lll, City Manager SUBJECT: REGULATING FIREWORKS SALE PURPOSE: To have the City Council discuss regulating fireworks sale. BACKGROUND: On February 26, 2001 Special Council Meeting, staff was directed to bring an item to discuss fireworks sale. Staff consulted with the City Attorney relative to the applicable statutes on local government's regulatory discretion on the sale of fireworks. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends for the City Council to receive a presentation from the City Attorney relative to the local regulations of fireworks sale. h:\trancntr\grants\beverag\agenda.doc ,,.~ '.. FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION 12.2 or that the true intent and meaning of the Code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the decision of the Chief to the City Council within thirty (30) days from the date of the decision appealed. (Code 1972 § 12-8; Ord. #904, § 1) 12-1.10 New Materials, Processes or Occupancies Which May Require Permits. The City Manager, the Chief, and the Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention shall act as a committee to determine and specify, after giving affected persons an opportunity to be heard, any new materials, processes or occupancies, which shall require permits, in addition to those now enumerated in the Code. The Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention shall post such lit in a conspicuous place in his office and distribute copies thereof to interested persons. (Code 1972 § 12-9; Ord. #904, § 1) 12-2 USE AND SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREWORKS.` 12 - 2.1 Time for Sale and Discharge. Safe and sane fireworks as defined by Section 12504 (presently Section 12529) of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California may be sold and discharged within the City during the period beginning at 12:00 noon on June 28, and ending at 12:00 noon on July 5 each year pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and not otherwise. (Code 1972 §12-11; Ord. #1183, §1} 12 - 2.2 License Required for Sales. Except as provided herein, no person shall offer for sale or sell at retail any fireworks of any kind in the City without having first applied for and received a City license. (Code 1972 § 12-12; Ord. #1183, § 1) 12-2.3 Application for License. All applications for a City license to sell fireworks shall: a. Be made in writing accompanied by a license fee, fire clearance fee and cleanup fee in the amounts established pursuant to subsections 12-2.9; 12-2.10 and 12-2.17 respectively. T'he fees are not for the purpose of revenue but will be used to defray administrative costs. b. Be made between March 1 and March 31 each year except when the last day falls on a Saturday or Sunday, the following business day shall be determined to be the last day. 'State law reference: Fireworks and pyrotechnic devices, Health and Safety Code, § 12500 et seq. 1205 12-2 LYNWOOD CITY CODE c. Set forth the proposed location of the fireworks stand applied for. The stands must be on private property located in C-1 or heavier industrial or manufacturing zones and must be located on Imperial Highway, Atlantic Boulevard, Long Beach Boulevazd, Abbott Road or Century Boulevard. The written permission of the owner of record or lessce must accompany the application. d. Be accompanied by an assurance that if the license is issued to applicant, applicant shall, at the time of receipt of the license, deliver to the City Clerk's office certificates of public liability and property damage insurance covering the operation of the stand and its premises in the amount of five hundred thousand ($500,000.00) dollars in the aggregate for the combined single limit bodily injury and/or property damage, including products liability, certificates designating the City as an additional assured thereunder, and a copy of the requisite permit from the State Fut Marshal. e. Include a statement that the applicant agrees to comply strictly with the terms of any license granted to it and famish any additional information upon request ~of the City Clerk or committee designated by the City Council. (Code 1972 § 12-13; Ord. # 1183, § 1) 12-2.4 'Notice of Granting or Rejecting of License. Applicants for any such license shall be notified by the City Clerk's office of the City by April 13 of the granting or rejection of such application for a license. (Code 1972 §12-14; Ord. #1183, §1) 12-2.5 Prerequisites to Issuance of License. The following qualifications must be met by each application for a license issued hereunder; a. No license shall be issued to any person, firm or corporation except nonprofit associations or corporations organized primarily for civic betterment, youth activities, sport, military or veterans affairs, charitable or religious purposes. b. Each such organization must have its principal and permanent meeting place in the corporate limits of the city, must maintain a bona fide membership of at least ten (10) members, and must have bcen organized and established in the City's corporate limits for a minimum of one (1) year continuously preceding the filing of the application for the license. c. No organization may receive more than one (1) license for fireworks sale during one (1) calendar year. One (1) license may be issued to two (2) or more qualifying applicants as a joint venture. The maximum number of licenses which may be issued pursuant to this section during any one (1) calendar year shall not exceed fourteen (14). 1206 ~.,. ~ 12-2 LYNWOOD CITY CODE e. Each stand shall be provided with two (2) two and one-half (2 1/2) gallon "soda and acid" or water pressure type fire extinguishers, underwriter approved, in good working order and easily accessible for use in case of fire. (Code 1972 § 12- I7; Ord. #1183, § 1) 12-2.8 General Requirements for Licensees. a. All weeds and combustible material shall be cleared from the location of the stand including a distance of at least thirty (30') feet surrounding the stand. b. "No Smoking" signs shall be prominently displayed on the fireworks stand and no smoking shall be permitted within the stand or within fifty (SO') feet of the stand. c. Each stand must have an adult in attendance and in charge thereof while fireworks are stored therein. Sleeping or remaining in stand after close of business each day is forbidden. d. The sale of fireworks shall not begin before 12:00 noon on June 28 and shall not continue after 12:00 noon on July 5. e. All unsold stock and accompanying litter shall be removed from the location by 5:00 p.m. July 6. f. The fireworks stand shall be removed from the temporary location by 12:00 noon on July 18, and all accompanying litter shall be cleared from the location by that time and date. (Code 1972 § 12-18; Ord. # 1183, § 1) 12 - 2.9 Deposit. Prior to the issuance of a license, each applicant shall file with the City Clerk a cash deposit in an amount established by resolution of the City Council, to assure compliance with the provisions of this chapter. Such deposit shall be refundable upon compliance with the provisions and requirements of this chapter, including, but not limited to, the event the licensee does not so comply or remove the stand or clean the site, in the manner required by the Building Official, the City may do so, or cause the same to be done by other persons, and the reasonable cost thereof shall be a charge against the licensee's deposit. (Code 1972 § 12-19; Ord. # 1183, § 1) 12 - 2.10 License Fee. The license fee for the selling of fireworks within the City shall be in an amount determined by resolution of the City Council which fee must be paid at the time of application. (Code 1972 § 12-20; Ord. #1183, § 1) 1208 `... .... FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION 12-2 12-2.11 Fire Clearance Fee, Subsection 12-3.1 mandates that a fire clearance be applied for at the time of application for license. The fee shall be in an amount established by resolution of the Ciry Council. (Code 1972 § 12-21; Ord. #1183, § 1) 12-2.12 Cleanup Fee. A cleanup fee in an amount established by resolution of the Ciry Council shall be paid at the time of application for the license. This fee is refundable upon completion of business activity and compliance with subsection 12-2.8f. (Code 1972 § 12-2.12; Ord. #1183, § 1) Cross reference: See also subsection 12-3.8. 12-2.13 Temporary Sales Tax Permit Required. Organizations licensed for the selling of fireworks aze required to obtain a temporary sales tax permit from the regional office of the State Board of Equalization. (Code 1972 § 12-23; Ord. # 1183, § 1) . 12 - 2.14 Display of State and City License and Sales Taz Permit. State and City licenses to sell fireworks and temporary sales tax permit shall be displayed in a prominent place in the fireworks stand. (Code 1972 § 12-24; Ord. #1183, § 1) 12-2.15 Prohibitions on Discharge. It shall be unlawful for any person to ignite, explode, project, or otherwise fire or use, any fireworks, or permit the ignition, explosion or projection thereof, upon or over or onto the property of another without his consent, or to ignite, explode, project, or otherwise fire or make use of, any fireworks within ten (10') feet of any residence, dwelling or other structure used as a place of habitation by human beings. (Code 1972 § 12-25; Ord. #1183, § 1) 12-2.16 Prohibition on Sale of Safe and Sane Fireworks to Minors. a. Every person, agent or employee engaged in the business of the sale or disposition of safe and sane fireworks, who sells, furnishes, gives or causes to be sold, furnished or given away any safe and sane firework to any person under the age of sixteen (16) years, whether or not the person engaged in the business has knowledge that the person sold to, furnished to or given to is under the age of sixteen (16) years, is in violation of this section. b. Any person under the age of sixteen (16) years who purchases any safe and sane fireworks is in violation of this section. c. Any person under the age of sixteen (16) yeazs who dischazges any safe and sane fireworks within the City boundaries except when under the direct supervision and in the presence of an adult, is in violation of this section. 1209 12-3 LYNWOOD C1Ty CODE d. For the purpose of preventing the violation of paragraph a., any person, agent, or employee, engaged in the business of the sale or disposition of safe and sane fireworks, may refuse to sell, furnish or give away any safe and sane fireworks to any person who fails to produce adequate written evidence that he or she is sixteen (16) years or over. Such written evidence may include, but is not limited to, a motor vehicle operator's license. Proof that the person or agent or employee, engaged in the sale or disposition of safe and sane fireworks, demanded, was shown and acted in reliance upon adequate evidence or proof of age of sixteen (16) years or over shall be a defense to any criminal prosecution under this subsection. e. In the event of a conviction, plea of guilty or nolo contendere, of any person, agent or employee, under paragraph a. of this subsection, any sponsoring organization from whose fireworks stand said illegal sale was made shall not receive a permit to sell fireworks the following year. (Code 1972 § 12-26; Ord. #1183, § 1 } 12-3 FIRE CLEARANCE AND INSPECTION FEES. 12-3.1 Inspection and Fee to Accompany Business License Application. All applications for business licenses shall be accompanied with a fire clearance inspection and fire clearance fee. (Code 1972 § 12-28; Ord. #1035, § 1; Ord. #1183, §2) 12-3.2 Statement of Fire Clearance Fees To Be Filed With City Clerk. The Fire Chief, no later than December 1 of each year, shall prepare and file with the City Clerk a statement of fire clearance fees due and payable for the January 1 calendar year. Such fire clearance fee shall be billed and payable with the annual issuance of licenses and license fees. (Code 1972 §12-29; Old. #1035, §1; Ord. #1183, §2) 12-3.3 Fire Clearance Fee Required in Full With Application Therefor. When application for fire clearance is made in the last three (3) months of the year, the full fire clearance fee shall be collected. The fire clearance permit will be issued effective through the end of the following year. (Code 1972 § 12-30; Ord. #1035, § 1; Ord. #1183,§2} 12-3.4 Annual Fee. An annual fee in an amount established by resolution of the City Council shall be charged for Fire Department fire clearance inspections. (Code 1972 §12-31; Ord. #1035, §1; Ord. #1133, §1; Ord. #1140, §19; Ord. #1183, §2) Cross reference: See also subsection 12-2.12. 1210 .-.. ~•.. FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION 12.2 d. If the number of applications exceed the number of licenses to be issued, the available licenses shall be granted by a drawing supervised by the City Clerk. (Code 1972 § 12-15; Ord. #1183, § 1) 12-2.6 Operation of Stand. a. No person other than the licensee organization shall operate the stand for which the license is issued or share or otherwise participate in the profits of the operation of such stand. b. No person other than the individuals who are members of the licensee organization, or the wives or husbands or adult children of such members, shall sell or otherwise participate in the sale of fireworks at such stand. c. No person shall be paid any consideration for selling or otherwise participating in the sale of fireworks at such stand. (Code 1972 § 12-16; Ord. # 1183, § 1) 12-2.7 Temporary Fireworks Stands. All retail sales of "safe and sane" fireworks shall be permitted only from within a temporary fireworks stand, and sales from any other building or structure is hereby prohibited. Temporary stands shall be subject to the following provisions: a. No fireworks stand shall be located within fifty (50') feet of any other building, three hundred (300') feet of any gasoline pump, twenty (20') feet of a curb line, nor within one thousand (1,000) feet of any other fireworks stand. b. Fireworks stands need not comply with the provisions of the Building Code of the City; provided, however, that all stands shall be erected under the supervision of the Building Official, wh'o shall require that stands be constructed in a manner that will reasonably insure the safety of attendants and patrons. c. No stand shall have a floor area in excess of three hundred (300) square feet. d. Each stand in excess of twenty-four (24') feet in length must have at least two (2) exits; and each stand in excess of forty (40') feet in length must have at least three (3) exits spaced approximately equal distants apart; provided, however, that in no case shall the distance between exits exceed twenty-four (24') feet. 1207 ,~. ,..`. ~~~ ~ ~ ~, . of ~,Y1~~OOD . ~ ~~ All-All <M~ ~~.'~ ~~ ~.~ City ,,1,4eEting Cho('~cnges ~ ~ ..~ '~~' 11330 BULLIS ROAD IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. AGENDA ~~~~~ ~`"~~~ ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION -... .. AT THE MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL CITY ^'= L`+ TO BE HELD ON MAY 1, 2001 ^°~~'~ ~" ~~~ ` ~' '" =-~'^ :~ COUNCIL CHAMBERS' 6:00 P.M. ,~~~ PAUL H. RICHARDS, II _, MAYOR // //~ ^ ., RICARDO SANCHEZ ARTURO REYES,(~~~'E~~ ~~ ~~~~~ MAYOR PRO-TEM COUNCILMEMBER 111 ' ''• £~ ~« c.~ ~~~~ LOUIS BYRD ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY RALPH W. DAVIS III SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY CLERK CITY TREASURER ANDREA L. HOOPER IRIS PYGATT OPENING CEREMONIES 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK 3. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards, II 5. INVOCATION 6. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATION a) AARP b) Shan Powell Furrilo 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS 8. COUNCIL RECESS TO: LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LYNWOOD INFORMATION INC. LYNWOOD PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY -~. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIAL DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5.) MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS: Special Meeting, April 16, 2001 PUBLIC HEARING 10. PROPOSED VACATION OF THE FIRST ALLEY WEST OF ALEXANDER AVENUE, NORTH OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY Comments: On April 3, 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution 20014.039 setting the public hearing for the proposed vacation. Notices of Proposed Vacation were posted as required by law. It is staff's opinion that this alley is not needed for traffic circulation purposes. Recommendation: To request that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES THE FIRST ALLEY WEST OF ALEXANDER AVENUE, NORTH OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 12197 IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 227, PAGES 37-38 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER". CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Council or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 11. LYNWOOD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FY 2001-2002 Comments: This report recommends that the City Council approve the attached engineer's report for the Lynwood Landscape Maintenance Assessment District and the City Council adopt a resolution of intension, which sets this matter for Public Hearing. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Adopt the attached resolution, which approves the engineer's report; and 2) Adopt the attached resolution of intension which sets this matter for Public Hearing on June 5, 2001. 12. SUMMER FOOD SERVICE AGREEMENT Comments: For the past (11) years, the City of Lynwood has been a sponsor for the Summer Food Service Program funded through a grant received from the State Department of Education. The program serves children that attend John D. Ham Park and the Lynwood Youth Center between the approximate dates of June 18 through September 21, 2001. The program has enabled the City to feed breakfast and lunch to over three hundred (300) children, Monday through Friday during the summer months or a total of ten thousand (10,000) meals. In 1992, Lynwood Unified School District became the responsible agency for the vending operation of providing meals to our Summer Food Service Program. When staff approached the Lynwood Unified School District Food Services for the 2001 program, they were again very interested in continuing to serve our needs. Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests that the Mayor and Members of the City Council approve the attached agreement with the Lynwood Unified School District to provide our meals for the upcoming summer program for the youth of Lynwood. 13. ORDINANCE -SECOND READING Comments: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ADDING SECTION 14.13 TO THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO DEVELOPMENT PLANNING FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND ADOPTING A STANDARD URBAN STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN" Recommendation: That Council review and adopt the Ordinance. 14. BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP REVOLVING LOAN FUND GRANT Comments: To inform the Lynwood City Council that the City of Lynwood application for the Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund grant has been selected as one of the forty- six (46) communities in the Country that will receive this grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Recommendation: It is respectfully recommended that the City Council receive and file the attached information. 15. WARRANT REGISTER: Comments: City of Lynwood warrant register for May 1, 2001 Recommendation: Staff recommends for the City Council to approve the warrant register .-•, DISCUSSION ITEMS NONE COUNCIL ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION PAUL H. RICHARDS, Ii, MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ, MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD, COUNCILMEMBER ARMANDO REA, COUNCILMEMBER ARTURO REYES, COUNCILMEMBER CLOSED SESSION NONE ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 15, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS' OF THE CITY HALL, 11330 BULLIS ROAD, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. .--. --~ LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 16, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Meeting at11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 9:16 a.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Rea, Reyes, Sanchez and Richards answered the joint roll call for all agencies. Councilman Byrd was absent. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, City Clerk Hooper and City Treasurer Pygatt. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE CLOSED SESSION City Attorney Thever stated that with respect to every item of business to be discussed in the Joint Closed Session pursuant to Section 54956.8: •:• A. Conference with Real Property Negotiators Property: 10925 Atlantic Blvd. Under Negotiation: Price and Terms •:• B. Subsequent Need Item: School District It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Rea to hear Subsequent Need Item: School District. Councilman Byrd arrived at 9:17 a.m. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to recess to Joint Closed Session at 9:18 a.m. Councilman Reyes left at 9:45 a.m. Council reconvened at 10:15 a.m. City Attorney Thever stated Council met on the aforementioned matters and stated on: • A. No Reportable Action •:• B. No Reportable Action AQENI~,A ITEM Item #4: Anti-Litter Feasibility Study After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Sanchez to adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2001.042 ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD TO SIGN THE ATTACHED "PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT" BETWEEN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AND DMG -Maximus, Inc. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN REYES Item #5: Opposition to Senate Bill - S8910 After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Rea, seconded by Councilman Byrd to adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2001.042 ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL CITING FORMAL OPPOSITION TO SB910 (DUNN, BURTON, HAYNES & MONTEITH) HOUSING ELEMENTS: FINES, PENALTIES AND LAWSUITS ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN REYES COUNCIL ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Councilman Rea inquired about the gas station at Long Beach Blvd. and the 1- 105 freeway. Asked if the station has been closed. Stated he is opposed to any issuance of a license. Have concerns about toxins and debris on the property. Stated we need to safeguard the city's interest. Wants the existing station to remain closed. Community Development Director Chicots said he will follow up on the status of the gas station and provide a report to Council. Councilman Rea also asked about the status of the "vehicles for sale" ordinance Council requested. Asked the City Manager for a report on the parking meter field trip they were involved in last week. Also would like a summer report on energy from Southern California Edison for critical planning for the upcoming months. Mayor Pro-Tem Sanchez stated Council received a report but that it did not contain any details. City Manage Davis stated that staff would bring this Item back to revisit the issue. City Attorney Thever discussed a similar ordinance in Los Angeles. Mayor Pro-Tem Sanchez asked the City Attorney to compare the ordinance to other cities that do not allow on street car sales. Discussed past conversations about setting up a controlled designated area for auto sales. Also asked about the status of the natatorium and clock tower. City Manager Davis stated staff has scheduled a CIP Update for the next Special Meeting. Public Works Director Wang stated the bid opening for the clock tower installation is scheduled for May 1, 2001. Mayor Richards suggested the possibility of requiring auto sellers to have a city business license. Also discussed laws related to vending. Councilman Byrd also asked for the status of an ordinance or permit to restrict on-street parking in residential areas from 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. daily. Guest: Margaret Araujo, Deputy -Assemblyman Carl Washington Will forward Council updates from Edison on the status of the electricity crisis. Discussed the purchase of her home and that in neighborhood with larger homes and lots multiple families are living in them and are using the street for parking instead of their property. Also asked if she could participate in the planning of the City's upcoming birthday celebration. ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro-Tem Sanchez and carried to adjourn the meeting at 11:10 a.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL16.2001 C •••, •~, DATE: May 1, 2001 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Mana r'~ BY: Joseph Y. Wang, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engin Paul Nguyen, Civil Engineering Associate SUBJECT: Proposed Vacation of The First Alley West of Alexander Avenue, North of Imperial Highway PURPOSE: To recommend that the City Council hold the public hearing and order the vacation and abandonment of a portion of the first alley west of Alexander, north of Imperial Highway. BACKGROUND: On April 3, 2001, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2001-039, setting the public hearing for the proposed alley vacation. ANALYSIS: The Fire Department, Sheriffs Department and all affected utility companies have been notified of the proposed vacation. An easement will be preserved for utilities located within the vacation area. Notices of the proposed vacation were published and posted as required by law. It is staff s opinion that the alley is not needed for traffic circulation purposes. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES THE FIRST ALLEY WEST OF ALEXANDER AVENUE, NORTH OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 12197 IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 227, PAGES 37-38 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER". coUotots Cou01015 AGEIVI)A ITEM ~~ Q U Q S5 ~~ O O ~MPERlAL C F, /6'2/ O O HVt/Y CITY OF LYNWOOD i 1~/~ c:? nl ~~ . 1 ~ 1 ~i 7 1~. ~. zz~ - ~~r- 3Y F'~20 PQ 5F1~ fl LLC Y Y!-~C~ITICN ORW0. CKD. 6Y APPROVED BY •~ • n ray e /1 ~/-} G H l"/F_ ~I T "A~~ DA/TE ' ?ly~v 5~3~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ORDERING THE VACATION AND BANDONMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES THE FIRST ALLEY WEST OF ALEXANDER AVENUE, NORTH OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 12197 IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 227, PAGES 37-38 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lynwood did, on the 3rd day of April, 2001, adopted Resolution No.2001-039, declaring its intention to vacate a portion of the first alley west of Alexander Avenue, north of Imperial Highway, as hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, notices of said vacation have been published and posted in the time, form, and manner required by law; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the matter was held on the 1st day of May, 2001, as prescribed by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lynwood as follows: Section 1. That the following described alley easement is unnecessary for present or prospective public use, and that the public interest, necessity and convenience require that the City Council of said City hereby order the vacation and abandonment of said alley easement. The northerly sixteen (16) feet of Lots 9 and 10 of Tract No. 12197, in the City of Lynwood, County of Los Angeles, State of California, Miscellaneous Records Book 227, Pages 37-38 of maps in the office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby determine that the public convenience and necessity require that an easement be retained for construction and maintenance of utility lines within the limits of alley vacation as described in Section 1. Section 3. That the City Clerk of the City of Lynwood shall cause a certified copy of said order to be recorded in the office of the Recorder of Los Angeles County. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2001. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II Mayor City of Lynwood co~oiois ATTEST: Cou01015 ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Lynwood STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RALPH W. DAMS, III City Manager JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. Director of Public Works/ City Engineer I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2001. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES City Clerk, City of Lynwood Ss. I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. on file in my office and that said resolution was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this day of 2001. Cou01015 City Clerk, City of Lynwood Cou01015 DATE: May 1, 2001 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Man ger - BY: Jose h Y. Wan , P.E., Director of Public Works/Cit En ine p g Y g ~ Paul Nguyen, Civil Engineering Associate SUBJECT: Lynwood Lighting Assessment District No. 2001-A PURPOSE: This report recommends that the City Council approve the attached Engineer's Report for Lynwood Lighting Assessment District No.2001-A and recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention, which sets this matter for public hearing. BACKGROUND: The Lynwood Lighting Assessment District was first established in 1978 under the Street Lighting Act of 1919. The District was reformed in 1981 under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The cost of maintenance, including the assessment engineering costs and administration can be levied annually against the properties which receive the benefits, thereby relieving the General Fund of that amount. Property owners are assessed only for the benefits received. The assessments were levied as a fair and equitable way to provide funds to maintain, operate and improve the lighting areas in the City. The plans and specifications for the District are on file with the City Clerk and the Director of Public Works. The City Council, on March 6, 2001, adopted Resolution 2001-26 proposing the formation of a Lighting Assessment District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and directed the preparation of the Engineer's Report. For fiscal year 2001-2002, the estimated cost of providing street lighting maintenance is $862,400. The annual installment for Certificate of Participation, as approved by the City Council in 1992 is $256,000. Since a surplus of $60,000 from FY 2001-2002 is projected, the revenue required for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 is $1,058,400. ANALYSIS: The current assessment rates are $1.62/F.F. and $3.01/F.F. for residential and commercial lots, respectively. If the City maintains these current rates for FY 2001- 2002, the estimated revenue would be $1,058,465, which is sufficient to cover for all costs of the District. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Adopt the attached resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING THE REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, SECTION 22565 ET SEQ., AS ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 6, 2001, RELATING TO THE LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT" AGENDA ITEM , 2. Adopt the attached Resolution of Intention entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 WITHIN LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", AS AMENDED, (COMMENCING WITH STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 22500 ET SEQ.), AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT Pursuant to the LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (Division 15, Part 2) STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DATED: May 1, 2001 LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Prepared by: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. City Engineer 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, California 90262 co~o~o~s ,.-. ENGINEER'S REPORT THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Gentlemen: Pursuant to the Resolution No. 2001-26 adopted by your Honorable Body on March 6, 2001, I have prepared the NGINEER'S REPORT Required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended, (Division 15, Part 2, Streets and Highways Code of the State of California). This Engineer's Report contemplates the levying of an assessment to provide funds necessary to construct, install, maintain and service public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities within the Lynwood Lighting Assessment District (the "District"). The assessment will be levied against those parcels of land within said District benefiting from the improvements, as required by law. Proper construction, installation, maintenance and servicing of the street lighting facilities within the District benefit each and every assessable property within the District by providing proper illumination for ingress and egress and safe traveling at night to and from such properties. It also improves protection of such properties from crime and vandalism. The foregoing enhances property values. Since the lighting facilities are located along the public streets, the front footage of each benefited property along such streets is used as the base for distributing the overall costs of the improvements in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each assessable parcel from the improvements. The different assessments for commercial and residential properties are based on different lumen and other design requirements along major arterial and residential streets. THE ENGINEER'S REPORT Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended, it is required that an Engineer's Report be prepared and filed with the City Clerk, who in turn presents it to the City Council for its consideration. The said Engineer's Report consists of the following: Engineer's Report May 1, 2001 Page 2 1. PLAN NO. 2001-A AND SPECIFICATIONS. The plans and specifications for the improvements within the District are on file with the City Clerk and Director of Public Works and incorporated herein by reference. Plan No. 2001-A shows the approximate location, nature and extent of the street lighting system of the District. Existing and previously proposed improvements for fiscal year 2001-2002 include, but are not limited to, the following: electrical energy; repair and replacement of street light standards and fixtures; labor; materials; equipment; miscellaneous improvements; overhead and incidental work and construction of capital improvement projects (see attached Capital Improvement Project List) as required. A diagram of the District, showing the exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of each lot or parcel of land within the District, is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's Maps for fiscal year 2001-2002 for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels within the District. 2. ESTIMATE OF COSTS. Maintenance and Servicing Costs The estimate of the maintenance and servicing costs with respect to the District (including incidental expenses) for the one year period beginning July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002 is as follows: Street Lighting A. Personnel $199,400 B. Maintenance & Operations $663,000 TOTAL COST $862,400 The maintenance and servicing costs are further described in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Capital Improvement Costs In 1993, the City of Lynwood entered into an agreement with the Lighting Assessment District pursuant to Section 22662 (b) of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 whereby the District received an advance of $2,560,703 from the City of Lynwood for deposit to the Capital Improvement Fund and would repay the City through the levy and collection of annual assessments for those improvements over a period of twenty (20) years, commencing with fiscal year 1992-93. The annual installment is $ 256,000. A list of the approved projects and their status is attached with this report as Exhibit A. Engineer's Report May 1, 2001 Page 3 Total Estimated Costs The total amount to be assessed against parcels within the District for FY 2001-2002, consisting of the maintenance and servicing costs for FY 2001-2002 and the annual installment for capital improvement cost discussed above, is as follows: FY 2001-2002 ASSESSMENT Street Lighting Costs $862,400 (Sidewalk and street maintenance and operation) Annual Installment for $256,000 Certificates of Participation (Revenue Bonds) TOTAL COST: $1,118,400 Estimated surplus FY 2000-01 $ 60,000 NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED: $1,058,400 3. TOTAL NUMBER OF LIGHTS IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD EDISON OWNED CITY OWNED TOTAL Lumen Number Lumen Number Lumen Number 7,000 0 7,000 41 7,000 41 9,500 1,635 9,500 251 9,500 1,886 15,000 142 15,000 80 15,000 211 20,000 143 20,000 146 20,000 289 25,500 0 25,500 551 25,500 551 35,000 0 35,000 8 35,000 8 47,000 0 47,000 87 47,000 87 55,000 0 55,000 5 55,000 5 TOTAL 1,920 1169 3,089 1. Residential properties with 7,000 - 15,000 lumen/light. 2. Commercial properties with 20,000 - 55,000 lumen/light. Engineer's Report May 1, 2001 Page 4 4. ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED COST There are approximately 10,055 parcels of property, with approximately 575,997 feet of front footage, within the District, excluding parcels of public property, which are not assessed for the cost of improvements. Zone Feet Rate Amount 485, 818 $1.62/FF $ 787, 025 2 90,179 $3.01 /FF $ 271,440 Estimated Revenue: $1,058,465 5. ASSESSMENT ROLL Incompliance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, copies of the County Assessor's Map and the County Tax Collector's tax rolls were used in this Engineer's Report. The assessment roll, for each parcel of land therein, shows the legal description, the County Assessor's code numbers, the assessable front footage used in calculating the assessment against each individual parcel and the total net assessment levied against the parcel. All assessable parcels of land in said District were included in one of the two zones of benefit as set forth herein above. The assessment roll is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is incorporated herein by reference. The foregoing Engineer's Report, which includes PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, and the DIAGRAM, ASSESSMENT ROLL and the ESTIMATE OF COSTS, is presented herewith for your approval by resolution. Dated this 1St day of May, 2001 Respectfully, JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. City Engineer City of Lynwood Attachments Cou01019 City ~YNWOOD Lynwood Lighting Mai 2001-A Boundary Map For information on lines Or pazcel, refer to plan 2 Assessors's Maps on file with the City All publicity owned From the district. STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET COMPLETED, 1. Street Lighting Rehab. (Res.) $740,503 100 2. Street Lighting Rehab. (Comm.) $1,114,000 100 3. Public Works Yard $360,000 100 4. Cesar Chavez Ln. Lighting $31,200 100 5. Security Lighting $100,000 100 6. Lynwood City Park Lighting $200,000 100 TOTAL: $2,545,703 Cou01020 ATTACHMENT "A" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING THE REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, SECTION 22565 ET SEQ., AS ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 6, 2001, RELATING TO THE LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council on March 6, 2001, adopted Resolution No. 2001-26, instructing the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk, a report in writing in accordance with the requirements of Streets and Highways Code, Section 22565 et. seq.; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed said report with the City Clerk and the City Clerk has presented said report to this City Council for consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve, order, and determine as follows: Section 1. The City Council has considered and passed on said report. Said report, as filed, is hereby approved. Said report, including any plans, specifications, estimates of costs and expenses, diagram and assessments are incorporated herein by reference and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk and may be examined by any interested persons. Reference is made to said plans and specifications for a description of the proposed improvements. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this- day of ,2001. PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS, III City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Joseph Y. Wang, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Lynwood co~oio~s RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 WITHIN LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", AS AMENDED, (COMMENCING WITH STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 22500 ET SEQ.), AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS WHEREAS, the City Council has directed and the City Engineer has prepared and filed a report in writing containing all matters required by Council under Streets and Highways Code, Section 22565, et seq.; and WHEREAS, said report has been presented to the City Council for consideration and has been received and approved. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve, order and determine as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 as amended, commencing with Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq., the City Council of the City of Lynwood hereby declares its intention to order the levy and collection of assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within an existing assessment district designated "Lynwood Lighting Assessment District (the "District") for fiscal year 2001-2002 to pay for the costs of those existing and previously proposed improvements described as: The installation or construction and maintenance and servicing of existing and previously proposed public lighting facilities and facilities which are appurtenant thereto or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including but not limited to, electric current, repair of street light standards and fixtures and incidental costs including labor, material and equipment. Such improvements constitute the maintenance and operation of sidewalks and streets, specifically, the maintenance and operation of existing and previously proposed public lighting facilities located in and along sidewalks and streets, including street lights and traffic signals, and facilities which are appurtenant thereto or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or operation thereof, including the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain public lighting facilities and traffic signals located in and along public streets within the City; and the installation and construction of previously proposed public lighting facilities, and facilities which are appurtenant thereto or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or operation thereof, which have been or are to be paid from the proceeds of revenue bonds." The boundaries of the District are conterminous with the boundaries of the City of Lynwood as shown on the map identified as Assessment District Map No. 2001-A on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 2. Reference is hereby made to the report of the Engineer approved by Council on May 1, 2001, by a resolution, and on file in the office of the City Clerk, describing in detail the improvements to be made, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. Section 3. Notice is hereby given that on June 5, 2001, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California, is the date, hour and place fixed for the hearing of protests and objections by the City Council to the levy and collection of the proposed assessments against the lots and parcels of land within the District for fiscal year 2001-2002. Any and all persons having any protest or objection to the proposed improvements, the extent of the assessment district, or the levy and collection of the proposed assessments may appear before the City Council at said hearing and show cause why said improvements should not be carried out and the proposed assessment and diagram confirmed, all in accordance with this Resolution of Intent and the report of the City Engineer. Prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. A protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by him. All interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. The city Council shall consider all oral statements and written protests or communications made or filed by an interested person. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of the passage of this resolution to be given at the time and place in the form and manner provided by law. Section 5. The proposed assessment for fiscal year 2001-2002 of $1.62 per foot of frontage for residentially zoned property and $3.01 per foot of frontage for commercially zoned property. Section 6 This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2001. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney PAUL H.RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS, III City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Lynwood TO: Honorable Mayor az FROM: Jim Given, Director BY: Ralph W. Davis, III, DATE: May 1, 2001 SUBJECT: STATE DEPARTM SERVICES PROGRAM Facts of the City Council and Community Services TION SUNNIER FOOD For the past ten (11) yeazs, the City of Lynwood has been a sponsor agency for the summer Food Services Program funded through a grant received from the State Department of Education of California. 2. The program serves all children that attend John D. Ham Park and the Lynwood Youth Center between the approximate dates of June 18 through September 21, 2001. 3. The program has been able to feed breakfast and lunch to over three hundred (300) children each and every Monday through Friday during the summer months or a total often thousand (10,000) meals. 4. In 1992, Lynwood Unified School District took over the vending operation of providing meals to our Summer Food Service Program. 5. When staffapproached the Lynwood Unified School District Food Services for the 2001 program they were very interested in continuing to serve our needs. Conclusion/Recommendation Staff respectfully request that City Council approve the attached agreement with the Lynwood Unified School District to provide our meals for the upcoming summer program. RD/JG/PB.pb ATTACHMENT AGENDA ITEM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the 8th day of May, 2001 pursuant to a minute order of the City Council of the City of Lynwood adopted at its meeting held on the 1st day of May, 2001 and a minute order of the Board of Education of the Lynwood Unified School District of Los Angeles County adopted at its meeting held on the 8th day of May, 2001, by and between the CITY OF LYNWOOD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. ("SPONSOR") and the LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ("VENDOR"). I. RECITALS: This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts and objectives. A. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) had made available funds for a Summer Food Program to provide meals at no cost to eligible children ("Provide"). B. Sponsor has entered into an agreement with the California Department of Education to provide for the Administration of the Program. C. Sponsor is desirous of entering into an Agreement with vendor for the preparation of meals pursuant to and in implementation of the Program. D. Vendor has a food service facility possessing the skilled personnel and equipment necessary for the preparation of such meals. II. MUTUAL OBLIGATIONS A. VENDOR TO PREPARE. Vendor agrees to prepare and place in containers provided by Sponsor such meals described hereinafter as Sponsor may order from Vendor in the manner hereinafter as specified for the Program. Vendor warrants that all meals prepared by it will be wholesome, suitable for human consumption and that Vendor shall meet all specifications and obligations under the existing regulations of the USDA, or as amended, as are pertinent or applicable to the Program ("Regulations"). B. CONSIDERATION. In consideration of the satisfactory performance of Vendor's obligations pursuant to this Agreement, Sponsor shall pay to Vendor the sum of $2.23 for each lunch and $1.28 for each breakfast prepared for service at locations within the City of Lynwood. The quantity shall not exceed three hundred (300) such meals daily except as may be mutually agreed upon by Sponsor and Vendor. Sponsor's ordering of a quantity in excess of meals daily and Vendor's providing thereof shall constitute such mutual agreement. In no event shall sponsor be liable or be required to pay for any meals which fail to meet the requirements of regulations, including those pertaining to USDA nutritional ,.-. requirements, such as meals of poor quality, unwholesome or spoiled meals or portions thereof or damaged meals or meals which otherwise fail to meet the requirements set forth in this Agreement (when all required meal components are served by the Sponsor}. PAYMENTS. Vendor expressly agrees that payment of such meals provided under this Agreement shall be made by Sponsor within sixty (60 days) after billing period. It is understood that the USDA assumes no liability for payment of differences between the number of meals delivered/prepared by Vendor and the number of meals served by the Sponsor that are eligible for reimbursement. III. ORDERING OF MEALS AND DELIVERY A. ORDERING. Sponsor shall order from Vendor on a daily basis such number of meals as are needed three (3) days in advance of service at the location within the City of Lynwood. Each daily order may be increased or decreased by Sponsor only upon notice given to Vendor no later than 1:00 p.m. on the day prior to the day upon which such increase or decrease is to take effect. B. PICK UP AND DELIVERY. Sponsor agrees to deliver all meals prepared for service at locations within the City of Lynwood on the day of the actual service of such meals. All breakfasts and lunches shall be available for pick up by Sponsor at Vendor's loading dock no earlier than 8:15 a.m. and no Later than 9:15 a.m. for breakfasts and lunches no later than 10:30 a.m. and no later than 11:45 a.m. on the day of service. Times may be adjusted with consent of both the vendor and sponsor. IV. PREPARTATION OF MEALS: Vendor agrees to provide different menus daily to prevent monotony in meals. A. LUNCHES. All lunches shall meet the requirements of the USDA reimbursable lunch, described generally as follows: 1. Eight (8) ounces fluid milk. 2. Two (2) ounces (edible portion as served) of meat or meat alternate (fish, cheese or one (1) egg, one-half (1/2) cup cooked dry beans or peas, or four (4) tablespoons of peanut butter), or an equivalent. 3. Three-fourths (3/4) cup of two (2) or more fruits and/or vegetables. A serving of full-strength fruit juice may be counted to meet no more than three-eighths (3/8) cup of this requirement. 4. One (1) slice of bread or equivalent made of whole grain or enriched flour or meal. B. BREAKFAST. All breakfast shall consist of the required number of the following components: 1. Eight (8} ounces of fluid milk. 2. One-half(1/2) cup of vegetables or fruits, or full-strength or fruit- strength vegetable or fruit juice. 3. One (1) slice bread or equivalent made of whole grain or enriched flour or meal, or three-quarters (3/4) cup of cooked cereal. ,~, ... C. PACKAGING. 1. Meals shall be packaged in a plastic bag or wrapped box by sponsor. 2. Each unit shall be capable of holding meals at a temperature of 32 degrees minimum not to exceed 45 degrees maximum, for a period of three (3) hours. 3. All sandwiches shall be individually wrapped and sealed. 4. An eight (8) ounce carton of milk shall be supplied with each meal. D. MENU CYCLE. Vendor shall provide lunches in accordance with menu cycle mutually agreed upon in writing which may be repeted for the duration of the program. Vendor shall provide hot lunches a minimum of three (3) times per week throughout the program. V. GENERAL FOOD HANDLING REQUIREMENTS A. FOOD ANALYSIS. At the discretion of the Vendor, and at its own expense, a random sampling of meals shall be sent to a recognized laboratory for analysis of portions, bacteria, coliform and plate counts. B. HEALTH REGULATION. All applicable health regulation will be adhered to by vendor at all times, sponsor, state and federal program authorities shall have the right to inspect vendor's premises and request formal inspections by health officials if deemed necessary. Failure to comply with applicable health requirements shall result in the termination of this Agreement. C. PERMITS. Food handlers permits shall be required in accordance with applicable requirements. Vendor shall have the responsibility to ensure that its employees observe sanitary food handling practices. D. HOLDING FACILITIES AND PACKAGING MATERIAL. Sponsor shall provide satisfactory holding facilities such as styrofoam containers. Packaging material shall be of strength sufficient to prevent crushing of food. E. QUALITY STANDARD. Quality standards shall adhere to state and local specifications, and all meat by-products shall come from plants inspected under afederally-approved inspection program. F. TRANSPORTING AND FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT. All transporting and other food services equipment shall be cleaned and sanitized on a daily basis. If condition of boxes becomes unacceptable for food handling, the sponsor agrees to replace containers. G. PACKING OF MEALS. Each individual meal (including beverage and fresh fruit) shall be unitarily packaged by sponsor. Vendor meals shall be packaged in bulk. Sponsor shall see that all components are served. Breakfast and lunch will be identified separately. H. PREPERATION AND ASSEMBLY OF MEALS. Meals shall be prepared under properly controlled temperatures. Assembly should include necessary eating utensils, napkins, condiments, etc. Assembled meals shall be held in properly refrigerated and/or heated areas that meet sanitation standards. Samples of finished meal packages in accordance with menus provided, shall be approved by sponsor and there shall be on deviation from the packaging presented and approved. I. PRODUCTS. All products shall be manufactured and assembled in a USDA or County of Los Angeles Health Department approved and inspected plant not more than twenty-four (24) hours prior to delivery. Vendor shall furnish upon request and at Sponsor's expense a microbial analysis, a chemical analysis and flavor analysis. J. DONATION FOODS. USDA donation foods will be utilized as practical in the program and in availability from the state. K. MEALS. Vendor shall supply complete meals only. If any portion of a meal is undeliverable, unacceptable or missing, sponsor shall disallow payment of total meal unless the missing components are provided before serving. L. VERIFICATION. Verification of the number of boxes, as well as the number of meals in each box, shall be made by sponsor on the vendor's dock at the time of loading. VI. RECORDS A. MONTHLY RECORDS. In addition to any other records, books, statements or invoices required to be kept by Vendor pursuant to this Agreement, Vendor shall maintain records (supported by invoices, receipts or other documenting evidence) as Sponsor will need to meet its responsibilities. Such information shall be reported within ten (10) days after the end of each month. B. KEEPING OF RECORDS. Vendor shall keep full and accurate records in connection with the meals covered by this Agreement. All such records shaii be kept on file for three (3) years after the end of federal fiscal year to which they pertain or any other period which the Secretary of Agriculture may from time to time designate. Sponsor or the auditors of USDA/California Department of Education, upon request, shall have access to all such records for audit and review at a reasonable time and place. Sponsor's authorized representatives and the representatives of USDA/California Department of Education shall have the right to conduct on-sight review of the food service operation. VII. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. TERM AND TERMINATION. The term of this agreement shall commence May 8, 2001, and shall terminate September 21, 2001, provided, however, that either sponsor or vendor may terminate this agreement by giving to the other party at least seventy-two (72) hours prior written notice thereof, meals will be served Monday through Friday, except July, 4 and September 3, 2001. B. CONTINGENT OF STATE/FEDERAL AGREEMENTS. Sponsor and Vendor understand and agree that this agreement is contingent upon the execution of underlying agreements with the United States Department of Agriculture or agencies thereof. Consequently, neither sponsor nor vendor shall have obligation to perform, and this agreement shall be of no force and effect until such time as such underlying agreements have been duly executed. Upon demand, Sponsor shall supply vendor with copies thereof. C. HOLD HARMLESS. Vendor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Sponsor, its agents, employees and officers against any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, costs, suits or expenses, arising out of any act or omission of any officer, agent or employee of Vendor or resulting from the condition of any property owned or controlled by Vendor. Sponsor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Vendor, its agents, employees and officers against any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, cost, suits, or expenses arising out of any act or omission of any officer or employee of Sponsor or resulting from the condition of any property owned or controlled by Sponsor. D. STATUS OF VENDOR. Neither Vendor nor any of its officers, employees or agents are, nor shall they be deemed for any purpose, employees of Sponsor nor shall they be entiltled to any rights, benefits or privileges of Sponsor's employees. E. NON-ASSIGNMENT/SUBCONTRACTORS. This Agreement is non-assignable without the prior written consent of Sponsor's City Council. Any attempt by Vendor to assign any of its duties, obligations and responsibilities shall be void and shall render this Agreement void forthwith. F. TIME OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in the performance of Vendor of its obligation hereunder. G. REMEDY FOR NON-PERFORMANCE. In the event Vendor fails to perform any or all of the tasks required by this Agreement, Sponsor reserves the right to perform such tasks not performed by Vendor. Vendor shall be liable to Sponsor for ail reasonable costs incurred in such performance. Sponsor shall not exercise any remedy available upon the occurrence of vendor's failure to perform until: 1. Written notice specifying any/all items ofnon-performance is given to vendor; and 2. Vendor shall have failed to correct the specified items of non- performance within forty-eight (48) hours of notice thereof. H. ADMINISTRATION. Any other designee(s) of the City Manager is authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City, to administer this Agreement and all related matters; and any decision of the City Manager or his designee(s) in connection herewith shall be final. I. NOTICES. Unless otherwise required by the context of specific provision of this Agreement, all notices or communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given if personally delivered or mailed first class, postage prepaid. Reckcitem/summer food service ageement2001 ATTENTION:PERRY BRENTS To Sponsor: City of Lynwood Recreation & Community Services Department 11301 Bullis Road Lynwood, CA 90262 ATTENTION:OFFICE OF BUSINESS SERVICES To Vendor: Lynwood Unified School District 11321 Bullis Road Lynwood, CA 90262 SPONSOR: City of Lynwood, a Municipal Corporation BY: Mayor Attest: BY: City Clerk The foregoing Agreement is hereby approved as to form: This day of , 2001 Approved as to Content: Director of Recreation & Community Services Department CITY OF LYNWOOD VENDOR: Lynwood Unified School District of Los Angeles County BY: Superintendent Rec%item/summer food service ageement2001 Date Date .Date Date ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-02 WITH RESPECT TO TRACT 8716, LOTS 188 THROUGH 196• ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 6189 PAGE 13 PARCELS 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 038 AND 902; LOCATED AT 4348, 4356 AND 4360 BREWSTER AVENUE; 11666, 11670 AND 11676 FIRST AVENUE AND THREE (3) VACANT CITY OWNED PARCELS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERNWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND THE ALLEY WEST OF ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA FROM P-1 (PARKING) TO R-1 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL). WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council did pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on April 17, 2001 on a proposed Zone Change with respect to the above identified subject properties and application; and WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environment, and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for the proposal, which is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council determined that Single Family Residential zoning of these properties would be consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council determined that R-1 zoning is consistent with the character of the neighborhood in the vicinity; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council has determined the zone change will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare citizens working or residing in the vicinity. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, at a duly noticed public hearing approved Zone Change No. 2000-02 pursuant to Resolution 2795 on October 10, 2000. Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed Zone Change will be consistent with the objectives and the development policies of the City of Lynwood. 6. The proposed Zone Change will not unreasonable constrain the use of property by landowners and developers. C. The proposed Zone Change will not adversely affect the General Plan. D. The Single Family Residential zoning designation of the properties would be compatible with surrounding land uses. E. A Zone Change from P-1 (Parking) to R-1 (Single-Family Residential) is consistent with goals and policies of the General Plan. _ _ H:~ WORDFILFPLANNING~RESOSbrd.epuncil.tt200402.doc AGENllA ITEtd 1 F. An R-1 zoning designation would make eight (8) nonconforming properties conforming. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determination, hereby approves Zone Change No. 2000- 02. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADDOPTED this day of 2001. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney H:~W ORDFlLFPLMTlITG1RESOSbrd.eouncil.rc2000.02.doc PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Department 2 DATE: May 1, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Manager BY: Gary Chicots, Director of Community Development Larry Hathorn, Project Consultant SUBJECT: BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP REVOLVING LOAN FUND GRANT PURPOSE: To inform the Lynwood City Council that the City of Lynwood application for the Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund grant has been selected as one of the forty- six (46) communities in the Country that will receive this grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. BACKGROUND: On December 18, 2000 the Community Development Department, on behalf of the City of Lynwood, submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency an application for a Brownsfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund grant. The grant from the Environmental Protection Agency to the City of Lynwood, if approved, would create a funding program to assist the developers of contaminated .properties with the requisite cleanup operations. On April 20, 2001, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christie Whitman announced that the City of Lynwood was selected as one of the 46 communities. To receive the maximum Brownsfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund grant amount of one million dollars (1,000,000.00). RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully recommended that the City Council receive and file the attached information. -.~ENllr ITF I FROf1u~ LARRi M. HATHORN "'~ FAX NC. 312 549 433? -~* Apr. 3b e221 12:22Ff1 P3 tK! 13:53 F~1' 1 _S 733 1796 L'SEP.~ REGIOti U9 ~r.1 Sao! `~ /j~~!'QIZSIIZISSlOl1 To: Name~~ Orgarii?.ation Mail Stop Fax No. Verification No. From: Name Address i~ 3~~ 5 -~3~2 -,.,.~, 1 ~ s . ~~~r`~ ~ U.S. Eanronmentai Pzotccxion Agency Region 9, Superfltnd bivision 75 Hawthorne Stmt ' Saa F'~~, CA 94 i OS Phoae No. Fax No. (41 S) X44. i 796 date ~/?o /o ~ No. of Pagcs . (tacludla$ Cover) ~, . Subject r . ote ~f ~ /) (} J1/~ ~~ ~"S ! i ~ Lt~ h r`~i'JQ ~ n ~' li'Sl'2~C ~-a~~` it/OfS r`~ ~~~ l o~ ~ Z Z ~ ;~~ ~g ~ r•~c ~ti ."•. FROM LARRY M. HATHORPJ FAX flC. ?10 549 432 ''^ Apr. Zb crOr~l 1?: ©~FM P4 b-320:01 FRI 11:J1 FAX 1 41S 744 1996 L'SEPi REGION U9 H.yL r,~,pp5 Unlttd StalocCommunications, Educotion, Washington, DC environmental ProtectiotiA.rtd Media Relations X0460 A~ oy(1703A) Environmental News FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, APRII. 20, 2001 EPA AD1~IISTRATOR WHITMAN ANl~'OUNCES $38 MYT.LIOv TO MAKE ABANDONED PROPERTIES THRIVE Bonnie Piper 202 564-4355 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christie Whitman, today in a ceremony with Liayor Anthony W illiams, selected the District of Columbia fora $100,000 Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilot to supplement the process of assessing the contamination of abandoned properties in the District. In addition, around the country more than 90 communities received funding of more than $38 million for Brownfields assessment and cleanup. Ai an event with Mayor Williams at the Brentwood Impoundment Facility in northeast Washington, EPA Administrator Christie Whitman said, "This year we've included previsions for the evaluation, protection and preservation of "greenspace" -parks, playgrounds, trails, gardens, habitat restoration, and open space. Rather than continue to neglect these abandoned properties, these grants spur partnerships among state, local, community groups, investors and developers to create jobs and get the work done. " Whitman added, "Since its inception in 1993, the brownfields program has provided over $162 million in grants with $2.9 billion leveraged and over 11,000 jobs created." The ultimate goal of the District's effort is to develop along-term self sustaining and efficient program that will include: a Brownfields inventory, a system for tracking clean-up activities, a streamlined approach to perruitting, and technical and financial assistance regarding site assessment and cleanup. To dale, at least five brownfields sites are being developed. Even though these assessments were not funded by EPA, the Brownfields pilot helped to leverage resources for the assessment and cleanup of these properties. Of these five, three will be completed by EPA through the Targeted Brownfields Assessment Program. These critical stet-up funds often make the difference for many developers to choose to clean up unused properties. Applications are received from cities, counties, tribes, and states to safely restore and promote sustainable reuse of neglected properties. The selection of these pilots provide critical support for assessment and low interest clean up loans to businesses to leverage Purds for the redevelopment oP these properties and the Derieration of jobs and tax revenues. Today`s announcement has a variety of categories for funding including 36 new Brownfields Assessment Pilot Grants totaling over $7 million to evaluate contaminated sites; morn than $5 million to continue and expand brownfields assessment on existing sites; $2b million in Brawnfields Cleant:p Revolving T.oan Fund pilots for 46 communities. Information aboutBrownfields is available 3t: ~yww,e~~ggv/brownflelds :7. FROr1 LARRY M. HATHORhJ ~ FAX hJO. __.. G4 ~2o,Y01 FRI 11 : a6 FAR 1 415 744 1796 United States Environmenta- Protection Ap®ncy Washington, D.C. 204fi0 31© 549 4332 -'"~ Apr. 26 c©D1 12: 01Fr1 P~ L'SEPA REGIO\ U 9 H.i~ Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5505) ~' UU: nap /lwww.cp:.goo/swcrosp:/o1~Z;,i-dod:iyn..cr.~ cPA S00-F-01.236 April 2001 wW~..~C J ~DrOµlnfl®Id5 Brovvnfi®Ids CI eanup Revolving Loan Fund Pilot .. Lynwood, ~A .. __ Outreach and Special Projects Staff (5105) _. Quick Reference Fact Sheet _..---r,.., 9 .. ._ .F ...._ _. __....... 's Brownfields Ecanomlc Red9velopment Initiative is desi ned to em ewer states, comrnunltles, and other ~stakeholderd in economic red®veiopment to work together In a timely manner to prevent, assess, saf®ly clean up. and sustalnably reuse brownfields. A brownfield is a site, or porilon thereof, that has actual or perceived contamination and an activ® potential for redevelopment or reuse. EPA is funding: assessment demonstration pilot programs {each tunded up to $250,000 over twro ~ ears , t ,aide saes and to test cleanup and ~ } o assess brownf' redevelopment models; job training pilot programs (each #unded up to fi200,000 over two years), to provide training • or residents of communities affected hY brownfields to facilitate cl®anup of brownfields sues ar,d prepare trainees ' fortuture employment in the environmental field; and, brownfields cleanup revolving loan fund (l3CRLF} programs ' iteach furded up io 51,000,000 over five years), tC provide financial assistance for the ®nvironmentei cleanup of brownfields. These pilot programs ere intended to provide EPA, states, tribes, municipalities, and communities with ~ useful In#ormaiion and strategies as they Continue to seek new methods to promote s unified approach to site assessment, environmental cleanup, and redevelopment. PILOT SNAPSHOT Lyndvood, CA Date of Announcement: Apri12001 Amount; SI,O rniIiion BDR`F Target A~er~: pour sites within the City of Lynwood BACKGROUND The City of Lynwood has a population o` 62,000 and is located in the southern part of Los Angeles Cory. Lynwood is one of tJ~e most economically depressed areas of Southern California, with poverty and unemployment rates at more than twice the national average. The per-capita income in 1990 was half ti7c national average. The eit}~ is plagued by a high incidence of crime, drug use, and teen pregnancy. ..-., FROh1 LARRY M. HATHORN FAX ~~0. 310 549 4332 ""~' Apr. 26 2©01 12:02F~1 Ph A4'2U~U1 FRI I.t:56 Fat 1 115 7~1d 1'96 L'SEP.~1 REGIOti 09 Hd.. ~1u03 u~.rcu- rasa ~necc - Lynwp~, C:A h(fp.//u w~~,2~S.kGv/f WC:OSDs/h!~~~'7[m~•dOJtIY ~+«~xl Approximately 400 of the city is located within the County oi'%os Angeles-designated Enterprise Zone. 'fhe City was awarded an EPA $rownfields Assessment Demonstration Pllot Program grant in 1999. ®CRLF OBJECTIVES The City of Lynwood is seeking to bring its brownfields back into productive use. The City will assist effort, to identify and assess contaminated sites and encourage site redevelopment. Lynwood's BCRI.I' l~rogrum Lvil) ~,tovide critical funding for the cleanup of panioipadng sites. The City has identified four sites as potential BCRLF loan recipients: (1}The AZarketplace Project will clean up a 13-acre site that is located between two developments, (2) Michael's Furniture lvlar:uf;icturing plans to ehpand into an adjacent vacant site that requires cleanup, (3) the AlarredalLzlperiaU Fernwood Trangle projeot rewires cleanup or" a 13-acre forcer jernkyara befog redevelopment ns a retail renter and daycare facility can begin, and (4) the Long Beach Boulevard Retail Site pmject requires cleanup before the 60,000 square-foot lot can be developed for neighborhood retailers. These projects have already attracted a total of $47 million in private financing, and potential DCl\L.L' borrowers have been identified. FUND STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS 1'he City of Lynwood's Conzlnunity Development Department will serve as the lead agency. The City is reviewing options for site man2ger, including the Stato Department of Toxic Substances ContreI, the P,eoional Water Quality Control Board, or a City employee. Selecticn cvill be based on the level and type of contamination identified tot the primary project sites. Lynwood's bisector of Finance w711 serve as the fund manager, with assistance and cooperation provided ~y the City's Community Development Department and the City Attorney's office. I_E~IERAQING OTHER RESOURCES Leveraging private sector funding will be key to the success of the BCRLF program. Anticipated private financing Por the four sites totals ::eazly 547 million. Complementary government funding sources include the L.S. Department of Housing and LTrban Development $rownfields Economic Development Initiative and Cotrununity Development Block Grants, Section 108 loan funds, and City Redevelopment Agency tax incre=ner,t financing. Use of BCRLF Pilot funds must be in accordance with CERCL4, and all CLRCLA restrictions on use of funding also avply to BCR~F furuls. CONTACTS Lynwood Community Dwelopr.~tent Department (~ 10)-603-0220 Region 9 Brownfialds Coordinator (415) 744-2237 Visit tl;e EPA Region 9 Brownfelds web site at: htin://ww~y.eP.~g v/region09/w telbrow i .htm Far further information, including specific Pilot contacts, additional Pilot information, brownfieIds news and events, and publications and lines, visit the EPA Brownfields web site at: FROM LARRY M. HATHORN FAx r~o. 310 Sag x332 '~"" Apr. 2b 2001 12:02FM P7 04~20•'Oi FRI 11:57 FAX 1 415 74-! 1736 L'SEPA REGION U9 fl.~a ~U'J, ~iv.~r~ ~ ... w+aa~ - ~,yu wuuU. l.h hI[' :liW WU'.8 9. OV/gWifO S~ ~ P fi sp t/ltrm!•doc:wr'.yr.woa.li~ l~1,p;~lwww.ep8 gOV/btOWM~PI~T Brownf elds Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund Pilor April ?001 Lynwood, CA EPA S00-F-01-23G . _.,_. , .~~ ~~~I ~ 0 1 0 0 3870 LEONARDO 5 RESTAURANT CATERING SVCS. 05-01-D1 7000.00 ,;" 103462 7000.00 3870 LEONARDO'5 RESTAURANT GATERING SVCS. OS-Q1-O1 7000.00 '' 103463 400.00 4283 THYRAS CATERING &__CONCESSIONS CATERING-SVCS___, OS-O1-O1 }~ 400.00 l ~ 103464 - 683.66 99999 ~UIN7EX WIRELESS TELEPHONE SERVICES 05-O1-01 663. 6b °" 103465 eSB.DD 1209 STAR PHOTO UNLIMITED PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 05-01-01 858.00 ~'~ _ 103466 _ 167; 40 3484 LDMTTA FLORIST &. GIFT, SHOP _.. __ FIORAL`SVCS. ___ _ _ _._.... OS-pi-O1 40 _- 1;67. _ __ _ _ 103467 187.60 1336 L. A. TIMES ADVERTISING SVCS. 09-01-01 . _ ____ __ _ 187.80 j`~ 103468 6475.42 3505 GATEWAY CITIES MEMDER5HTP DUES OS-01-O1 ~ 6475.92 ',I =d 103469 4700. B2 241 SHELL OIL_COMPAP~Y ___ GASOLINE PURCHASE OS-O1-O1 _.__4700, 82_ _ ', •; x' 103470 S9, 3S 99499 VERIZDN WIRELESS - TELEPHONE SVCS. 05-OI-O1 59.35 R 103471 176.30 99999 KATHY REAL REIMBURSEMENT 05-p1-01 176,30 x' _ 20000:00 4297 WOLF LAW FIRM- ----__.-- LEGAL. SVCfi, - -----..___ 0$-01-D1 2400. OQ __. _ :__:. _ ix'' 103473 1258.10 37 MDNA AMERICAN BUSINESS CARD BANKCARD SVCS. OS-OS-O1 1258.10 , ~~19 103474 6000.00 19~t WAVE COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING SVCS. OS-01-01 6000.00 ~' _ 103475__ _4166. OD 290 TRUEVINE_CONMUNITY OUTREACH,-- COMMUNITY SVCS.. _ .-, _ - . _. 0501-Q1 4166. 00 ~~'" 103476 35n:4Q 99499- MARIA RAMTREZ REFUND/PARKING 05-01-01 352. 4b 103477 1661.21 37 MBNA AMERiGAN DUSINESS CARD BANKCARD. CHARGES 05-01-01 16b1.21 ~ 103478 -_ --._2877 ,93__ _999g9_ U. 5._ DAN.CORP_-- ..-._.__.___.- __ _ - BANKCARD_ CHARGES Q5-01-01_ _ _-...._.2877 53_ .___ 103474 250.00 4296 ICON TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION SVCS. OS-01-O1 250.00 103480 2500.00 3402 MARK FULLERTON CONSULTING SVCS. OS-O1-01 2500.00 I 103481_ 250_QO_ 4293 JOHN H:- FAIRE __- ENTERTAINMENT SVCS. ___ _OS-O1-01 250. 00 103482 1500.00 4298 EL SALVADOR DIA A DIA ADVERTISING SVCS. - 05-O1-01 , __ T __ _ 1500:00 i ~ 103483 404.36 1115 P. E. R. 5. -HEALTH MEDICAL PREMIUM 05-01-01 ~ 404, 36 103484-- _._,..,,1236.00 1119,. _CANADA LIFE _ LIFE_INSURANCE PREMIUM OS-O1-O1 1236.00 I 103485 206.00 962 TRAN5AMERICA ASSURANCE COMPANY INSURANCE PREMIUM OS-Ol-O1 206,00 ~ , 103486 131.00 99999 ARTANNA BROOKS REFUND/PARKING OS-O1-01 131.00 WARRANT DATE; 05-01-01 PREPAIDS AND VOIDS C I T Y of W A R R A N T LYNWOOD -------- ------.. REG I S TER PAGE: 1 ; I~~ -- _ -._-_ _ _ _ _ ----- ---- - - --- - - --- --- - -- - ----------- - -- ------- ---- _ . .. _ - ~ I ,: WARRANT# AMOUNT VENDOR# VENDOR NAME - DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT ',' 1D 102050 350.00 928 LOS ANGELES TIMES ADVERTISING SVC5. OS-O1-01 350.00 ~ i 102067 519.09 666 TAJ OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES OS-O1-O1 519.09 ' _.1.02079 _ 70. QO 49999 JESUS VILLALOCi05 -_.___ _ ,.___.. __ -PARKING/REFUND _ _. __ ___ _. 05-01-01 70. 00 .- .,. . 102463 2812.64 b66 TAJ OFFICE SUPPLY pFFIC&& SUPPLIES OS-01-O1 2812.64 ~; 103459 ....$21,37 99994 MIKE OGHOA REIMBURSEMENT D5-O1-01 221.37 L, __ 103460 _ I 1363.20 _335 A7fi~7~1 IRELESS_TNC,_ ____ TELEPHONE SVC5. 05-01-01 1363. 20 1 346 7G 0 0 _ ______-- __ _.______.. __ - _ ___,____ ._ _ _- - --.... _ i, a a a 103487 449.55 99999 MISSION INN LODGING/HOOPER OS-O1-O1 449.55 ' ~~ 103488. $500.00 850 BEVAN THOMAS CONSULTING SVC5. 05-O1-01 2500.00 '~ 103484 4950:00 3668 JACKSON & ASSOCIATES MITIGATION 6VCS. 05-01-01 4950.00 i ', _ 103490 __-_ __ 1900. 00 4245 EVENT$._.BY NODNAN RENTAL SVC5. 05-O1-D1 1900.00 •~ ~'i 103491 268.74 99999 TARGET TELEVISION PURCHASE 05-O1-01 268.74 'i 103492 5000.00 171 AL WILLIAMS TALENT AGENCY ENTERTAINMENT SVCS. 05-01-01 5000.00 i__ 103493 _ 400.00 171 AL WILLIAMS TALENT AGENCY ENTERTAINMENT SVCS. 05-D1-O1 400.00 ~'I 103494 200.00 3736 PAUL HAN50N - ENTERTAINMENT SVCS. 05-01-Oi 200.00 ,~ 103495 .300.00 99949 ANTkONY SPOTTSEVIILE ENTERTAINMENT SVC5. 05-01-01 300.00 '' ' 103496 2000.00 4241 MEGA KCMG SUITE- ADVERTISING SVCS 05-01-01 2000.00 I I 103497 2000.00 4287 RECUERDDS ADVERTISING SVC5. OS-O1-01 ____ 2000.00 ~~ 103448 2000.00 171 AL WILLIAMS TALENT AGENCY ENTERTAINMENT SVCS. 05-01-01 2000.00 ~^ 103449 3200.00 4163 SUNRISE GON5TRUCTTON___ ___ CONSTRUCTION SVCS. 05-01-01 3200.00 ~ ~ ss 103500 250.OD 4227 A. F.C. COACH TRANSPORTATION SVCS. _ OS-O1-D1 250.00 ~ ~.sa 103501 44, 52 1022 5YSC0 GATERING SVCS. 05-01-01 . - 44. 52 I it ~ 103502 4617,00 7 CALIFORNIA SECURITY, INC. SECURITY SVCS. 05-01-01 4617.00 ~ 103503 310.50 7 CALIFORNIA SECURITY, INC. SECURITY SVCS. OS-01-01 -- 310.50 i 1 ,a WAI?RANT DATE-' 0!i-O1-O1 ' PItLI'AIDS ANU VUIUS "~ WARRANT# AMOUNT VENDOR# VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION PAGE: 2 INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT """"' Y~ •~~~ vim' ,i,~c,e XtftuX CIIRI'URATIUIJ 103`-i05 250 OU 3640 CIJESTER l_. LYON 10350/, 947 .5' L022 SYSCU 103507 IG61 .93 1022 SYSCO 103508 310 .44 1022 5YSC0 103509 1004 .44 1022 SYSCO 103510 ;300. 00 42B~i ER I C NAGI_E 103511 1829, 53 37 MBNA AMER1!'AN BVCiINE5S CAR 103512 7F;/5. 72 4232 ACCENET IIJC. j 103513 IG68. 92 99999 NEXTEI_ "~ 103514 41027. 04 571 WATER REPLENISHMENT li''~ 103515 135, 00 I2_ IOEAS ENTERPRISF;S "I 103516 ]90. 00 3698 f'ATRICIA RD11AN "j 103517 300. U0 99999 MARY '1HOMA5, PRE5IDEPJT OF 103518 3`,3. 5O 99999 PD0 PARTY DENTAL 103519 2555. 00 4292 WINEFIEI_D '~ ASSOC. "'° 103520 2186. I1 3553 IJEY(TEL COMMUNICATION `' 103521 14569. 76 172 CITY DF L1'NWUDO "' 10352. 5263. 00 3740 FIESTA TRA'JE1. r 103523 U 00 49999 SPOILED 10354 0. 00 99999 ~iF'UILED 103525 0. 00 99999 SPOILED 10:]526 3?_4. 00 7 CALIFI]RNIA SECURITY, INC. 103527 9540, OO 4206 MICHAEL J WAGfJER °~ ASSCIC 103528 4631. 62 893 PAGEANTRY l'RI)P',; '< DECIIR 103529 1172, 00 1'd 54 JCISE I_VIS ESF'[IJOZA 103530 2244. 18 940 JAY'S CATFiRINC 103531 1763. 63 940 ,JAY'S CATERING 103532 217. 19 152 AMERIPRIUE UNIFORM SERVICE 103533 560. 00 3718 GAVIU VDUNG 103534 225. 39 1.117 SAFEGUARD HEALTH PLAPJS 103535 43. 44 106 VERIZDN W[17ELE55-LA 103536 4950. 00 3668 JACKSON °< ASSOCIATES ' ', 103537 4950. DO 3668 JACKSOf•J !;c ASSOCIATES V 103538 496, 24 4281 ALLIAfJT F-DUD SERVICE 'si 103539 1942. 83 004 HOME DEPOT ~" 103540 289925. 63 205 PAYROLL FUND 103541 424. 57 3871 MISSION STUCCO ~'," 103542 597. 39 3553 NEXTEL COMMUNICATION ~'yi 103543 1330. 56 1790 OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION '''~ 103544 1399. 68 4299 DESIGN SIGNS s' l 1Q3S45_._. ____ 424Z. OR-_ __-a29 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES sa i 103546 12000. 50 4101 USS CAL BUILDER5~ INC. " 103547 1149. 50 99999 JORGE °< GLORIA GARCIA ~ ':; 1D354E{ 8497. 50 4300 WINEFIELD °< ASSOC- , ~'' ~ ~s` 103549 51. 63 4281 ALLIANT FOOD SERVICE ' I 103550 37. 50 4044 SMART °~, FIPJAL '1' 103551 4417. 00. ] CALIFpRN1A SECURITY INC. 103552 195. 90 3549 SPARKLETTS C I T'I of LYNWOOD W ARRAN T R E G I S T E R MAINTENANCE AGREEMEI'JT 05-01-01 4740 02 WEIGHTLIFTING INST'fiUCT01t G5-01-01 2SQ DU CATERING SVCS. 05-01-U1 94 ? . 52 CATERING SVCS. DS-01.-01 1061 .93 CATERING SVCS. US-O1-O1 310 .44 CATERING SVCS. OS--O1-01 1084 .46 BARTENDIFJG SVCS. OS--O1 O1 300 .00 U BANKCAf[D CHARGE'S 05-CJ 1.-Ul 1829 .53 CI:IMI'l1TEfi SVC;>. OS--0]-01 7875 .7:_' TELE:PHUNE SVCS, 05--01--01 ]068 ,92 WATER PURCFU,51' 05-01-O1 4]02? 84 PRINTING SVCS 05-01-01 135 . DU AEkCIBI(S II~ISTRl1CTDlt 05-01-01 188 .00 AAFtP CATE~RIFJG SVGLi. OS 01~-G] UOO OU kEPITAI_ S`J1:5. 05-01-01 353 . 50 CONSUL'iING SVCS. OS-DI-U1 2555 ,00 TELEPHONE SVCS. 05--01-01 2186 ,11 WORK1iR.",S:~D~.,1RF.IM6. OS -U 1-U 1 14569. 76 AIkL.I1JE TIC14Ef OS 01-01 5263 00 FiPOIL..ED 05-O1-°(?1 0. 00 SPDn_En os of 01 0. 00 SPOIL-ED OS-O1-Ul D, 00 SECl1RI7Y SVCS. 05-01-01 34. 00 IIDl15IPJG ELEMENT SVCS. 05-GI-OL 9540. 00 AWARDS 05--OI-O1 4H31. 62 F'F10TOGRAF'HY SERVICES 05-OI-O1 1172. UO CATERING `.iVCS US-Ol-U1 2244. 18 CATERING SVCS, OS-U1-O1 1763. 63 ~~ UNIFORM SVCS. 05-01-01 217. 19 CONSULTING SVCS. 05-01-01 ~i60. 0U DENTAL PREMIUM 05-01-01 225. 39 TELEPHONE SERVICES OS-U1-O1 43, 44 MITIGATION SVCS. OS U1-O1 49;0. 00 MITIGATION SVCS. OS-01-U1 4950. 00 CATEiRING SVCS, OS-OL-U1 496, 24 OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-U1-U1 1942. 83 PA\'RUt_L FUND OS-O1-O1 289925, 63 OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-U1-01 424. 57 TL-LEF'HONE SERVICES GS -O1-O1 587. 39 SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAf1 05--O1-UI 1330- 56 BANNERS 05-01-01 1399. b8 NEMDERSHIP DUES OS-01-O1 4267. 00 CONSTRUCTION SVCS. OS-01-O1 12000. 50 PROPERTY ACDUISITION US-01-O1 1149. 50 CONSULTING SVCS. 05-01-01 849? 50 CATERING SVCS. OS-O1-O1 51 b3 OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-01-01 37. 50 SECURITY SVCS. OS-O1-O1 4617. 00 OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-01-01. 195. 90 u) ~ i C I TY of LYNWOOD i WARRAhJT DATIi: 05-01-01 WAR RANT R E G I S T E R ~' F~Rf~rnlns , ,~ 1. Arlu vmn5 ,! WARRANTq AMOUNT VENpORR VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 10;I'i'i3 25.00 99999 CLEOPFIUS K[DD ftf_FUND/PAR{(INO 103554 150.00 99'199 GRANTWRITER`; CLJM REO JA. ApAMS 103555 175.00 99999 LIEDERT CASSIDY HEu^;'RICHARUS 103556 245.70 99999 HOLIDAY INN CAPITOL LODGING/J. HOWARD 103557 73805. q2 172 CITY OF LY'NWOOD REIMDURSEMENT ]03558 300. OD 99999 USC/DAA DINNER TICKETS u~ i ,~~ „', ~~' 9 SU 51 SJ SJ _. 5 76 'a ~ PAGE: 3 INV PATE INVOICE AMOUNT OE.-O1 -01 25. 00 05-01 ~-O1 150, 00 0S-O1-01 475. 00 05-0]-O1 245. 76 05-01-01 73805. 42 OS-O1-01 300. 00 TOTAL. PREPAYS : h2902L 57 TOTAL VDID5 0.00 TOTAL 629021.57 lJ ~`~ WARRANT DATE: OS Ol--O1 I ~, i' ~ WARf{AIJ1N AMUUNF VF.NUURIt VENDDf PJAM.E ~I ._ C I T Y ^f W A R R A PJ T L Y N W O O D R E G I S T E R PAGE: 4 IIJV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ~"' 103646 21. 1U 99999 f,-Z DUS SALES, INC. i AUTCI PARTS 05-01--01 21 IU 103647 25. 00 3253 HECTOR ADAI2CA PLANNING CDMM 4/10 US-O1-O1 25. 00 L03648 804. 59 1289 ADC HARDWARE (7PERATING SIJPF'LIES 05-01-01 804 59 103649 122. 8~i 1334 ADC HARDWARE OPERATING SUPPLIES 05--01-O1 122. 85 103650 407. 67 445 ACADEMY PUI:7LS OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-01-01 40'. 67 103651 50. 00 682 ADT 5EClJRI'FY SERVICES ALARM SVGS. OS-01-O1 50. 00 103652 '05. 49 801 ADT SECURITY SERVICE INC. ALARM 5VC5. 05-D1-01 205. 49 103653 483. 84 99999 AEG SDLVTIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 05-UI-O1 483. 84 1U36~i4 1750. OU 4227 A F. C. CDA(:H 1RApISP0f2TAT'IOfJ SVC 05-01-01 1750. 00 103555 393. 90 99999 AIR COND. DISTRIDIITDRS OPERATING SVPPL.IES US-U1-01 393. 90 103656 25. 00 3756 SAL ALATDRRE TfiAF'FIC CDMM 3/22 OS-01-O1 25 00 !03657 361. 20 3527 ALFA CARDURETORS AUTCI PARTS 05-01-01 . 361, 20 jil 103658 257. 41 420 ALL AMERICAN HOME CEPI'TER OPERATING SUPPLIES US-01-O1 257. 41 " 103659 148220. 28 3942 ALTEC INDUSTRIES, INC TRUCK MDVNTING DEVICE 05-01-01 148220. 28 ~ 103660 182. 01 0147 AMERICAN RENTALS OPERATING SUPPLIES US-Ol-O1 182. 01 103651 2600. 00 99999 ANTONIO Z1!NIGA REFVfJDADI..E DEPOSIT 05-UI-O1 2600, 00 h5 103652 56. 00. 99999 APA MEMDER5HIP DU1:5 05-U1-01 So p0 "' 103663 3238. 22 0159 AQUA METRIC SALES CD. OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-01-01 3238. 22 103654 218. 44 760 ARGO ELECTRIC SVPPLV CD. UPERATINU SUPPLIES OS-OI-DI 218. 44 ,, 103665 127. 50 4079 ASTRD CAPJON SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OS-O1-O1 127. 50 ~ 103666 539. 00 39'i3 ATLANTIC CAft WASH (.AR 41ASH 5VC5. 05-U1-01 639. 00 103667 25 DO 2865 JOHN DEIMFI? 'TRAF'F'IC CDMM 3/2L' U5-O1-i)1 25 UO i 103668 207. D6 788 DISHDP CD. OPERATING SUPPLIES 06-01-01 207 86 ~''l 103669 15. 95 99999 DLACK ENTERPRISES MF.MDER5HIP UUES 05-01-01 . 15. 95 103670 799. 46 880 DLUE DIAMOIUD MATERIALS (JPERATINf, SUPPLIES p5-O1-U1 799 46 ~"' I~ 'I 103671 1389. 73 956 DLUE DIAMUI`Ill MATERIALS OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-01-01 . 1389. 73 ' ~ 103672 25. 00 1578 MARGARET ARIGHT TRAFFIC COMM 3!22 OS-01-O1 25. 00 103673 620. 24 3556 DRODKS PHOllIJL'T OPERATIN(: SUPPLIES S- 0_ 01-01 ', 6~0. ~ ~4 103674 599. 29 99999 DROOK,:, OPERATTING SIJPF'LIES 05-U1-O1 599. 29 103675 322. 60 102 CAL ADUISON AUTO PARTS 05-01-U1 322. 60 103676 8476. 65 936 CARL WARREpI ?~ CO. LIADILITY CLAIM OS-OI-O1 8476. 65 103677 51746, 76 822 CIVIL WORKS CORP. CONSTRUCTION SVGS. OS-01-01 51746, 76 I;i 103678 1198. SD 53 CLINICAL LAD OF SAN DERN WATEP. SAMPLING SVGS. 05-Oi-UI 1198, 50 l 103579 55005. 53 57 CCIMMUTER DUS LINES TRDL.LEY S'JCS. OS-O1-O1 55005. 53 a' i Ip3680 ._.3969. 05 4278 COOK [OUIPMENT COMPAN'( REPAIR SVGS. 05-01-01 3969. 06 103681 13, 00 1005 COUNTY REGISTRAR-RECORDER LIEN SVGS. OS-O1-pl 13. 00 °'' 103682 413. 46 1338 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PEST' CONTROL SVGS. 05--O1-p1 413. 46 °' 103683. 7002, 44 698 COUNTY OF L. A ANIMAL CONTROL HOUSING 5VC5. OS-U1-01 7002. 44 ar 103684 79107. 01 1032 COUNTY OF L.DS ANGELES LAW ENFDRCEMEfJT SVGS. 05-01-01 79107. 01 '. ]03685 3b 62 3Fi32 CULLIGAPJ WATER SOATF.NF,R 05-01-Oi 3b b2 "'i 103686 _ _..1039. 54 742 DANGELO C0 OPERATING SUPPLIES U5-O1-01 1039. 54 '9 103687 5946. 40 1179 DAPEER (r ROSENDLIT LEGAL FEES p5-01-01 5946, 40 so 103688 40. 00 934 DATA PLUS COMMUPJICATIONSi INC. TELEPHONE SERVICES OS-01-01 40. 00 ". ..103689__._ ._ ___.14L 5p_ __ 3511 DATAOUICK PROPERTY INFORMATION OS-0t-O1 Ibl SD '' 103690 1128. 00 543 DEE-MAR. INC. TEMPORARY SVGS. OS-pI-OL 1128. 00 "' ~ 103591 4616. 92 0187 DIAL MODILE COMMUNICATIONS AUTO PARTS OS-O1-01 4blb -, 9~ I" " 103692 953. 28 1164 DISCOUNT RADIATOR SERVICE AUTCI PARTS OS-Ol-O1 953. 28 ~ 103693 9300. 00 4022 DMR TEAM CONSTRUCTION SVGS. OS-01-01 9300. 00 "'~ ,, 103694 25. 00 73 DONALD DOVE PLANNING CDMM 4/10 OS-01-O1 25. 00 ~,~ ~ I I' WARRiiPIT WAf1HANTN DATE 05- kMOUNI 01-01 VENDORJI C I I Y of W ARRAN T VENDOR NAME LYN4100D R E G I S T E R DESCRIPTION INV DATE I PAGE' S INVOICE AMOUNT ~i 103703 378 .70 4254 U °~ S MUL7IMEDIA'S, INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES DS-O1-01 379. 70 ! ' 1DJ704 25 ,00 86 DETTE ESPESETH RECREATION 3127 05-D1-O1 25 00 ~I 1U370S 69L 2(1 93? EXCEL NURSERY OPERA'iING SUPPLIES 05-01-01 , 691 2U 103706 1295 .72 812 FAIR I-JOl1SIIVG FOUNDATION COPIM(1NITY 5VC5. OS-O1-D1 . 1295 72 103707 143 .64 4284 FASTFRAMES FRAMES D5-U1-01 . 143 64 103708 49 .56 896 FED EX DELIVERY SVCS. 05-01-01 . 49 56 103709 583 .90 0118 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE COFFEE SUPPLIES OS-O1--D1 . 583. 9D 103710 184 .23 3534 FORD EL.ECTRUNICS OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-01-01 184. 23 I 103711 2456 .19 917 GD5 LINEN LINEN 5VC5. - - OS U1 O1 ~ 956 ! 19 103712 562_ BEi 4209 GCS WESTERN POWER ? EOIIIP MAINTENANCE AGREEPIENT 05-01-01 . 562 86 103713 ;77. 52 4030 GEORGE CHEVROLET AI.ITCI PARTS 05-01-01 . 577. 52 j 103714 32 OB 4031 GUHD DUILDING MATERIALS OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-O1-DI 32 06 i "~ ]03715 103716 1047, 204. 57 62 3848 4039 HACH COMPANY HOME DEPOT OPERATING SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-O1-01 05-01-DI . 1047. 204 57 62 '' ' 103717 62. 19 032 HOME DEPOT OPERATING SUPPLIES OS--U1-01 . 62 19 " 103;18 567;. 84 526 HONEYWELL INC MAIFTENANCE AGREEhIEfJT 05-01-01 . 5675 84 !~ "' I !03719 559. - 99 051 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS PAINT SUPPLIES D5-01-D1 . `159 99 ' ;' 103720 1980. 00 3706 INFOSEND~ INC, WATER/MUNICIPAL DILLS 05-01-01 . 1980 00 '`I ' 103721 100. 64 597 J.P.M. GLA55 CO. GLA55 REPAIR 05-01-D1 . 1D0. i 64 ~" 103722 1385. 49 3359 JERRV'S SIGNS °< DESIGN SIGNS 05-01-01 1385. 49 ! " 103723 331. 20 3439 JODS AVAILADLE INC. ADVEiRTISING SVCS. 05-U1-01 331. 20 'I 103734 483. 5U 4250 JOHN HILL .°~ A55UCIATE:S PROFESSIUfJAL 5VC5. 05-O1-DI 483. 50 i 103725 3996. 57 136 JONES l_11t1DER OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-01-Ol 3996 57 " 103726 135. 00 4049 JORGE L. WEDSTER DEE HIVE REMOVAL OS-O1-01 . 135 00 !i "i 103727 30, 00 001 KING FENCE TEMPORARY FENi:E OS-01-O1 . 30 00 103728 2168, 69 0125 L Y~ N UNIFORMS UNIFORM RENTALS OS-O1-01 . 2168, 69 103729 1699, 43 841 COUNTY OF I_. A SHERIFF'S DEFT HELI(:OPTE:R SVCS. OS-O1-O1 1699 43 103730 9446. DO 534 LEAGVE OF CALIFIIRNIA CITIES MEMDER5HIP DUES 05-01-01. , 9446. 00 103731 4120. '{ 0. 4000 ~~ LIEDERT CA.,,,IDY ~,~ PROFE55ICINAL aJC5. OS-01-U1 4120. 03 103732 62B7, 76 771 LINGO INDUSTRIAL ELF.CTROEJICS OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-01-O.1 6287 76 103733 25. D0 3330 ERNESTO S LUPEZ TRAFFIC COMM 3-22 OS-01-O1 . 25. 00 l 103734 ' 175. 00 928 LOS ANGELES TIDIES ADVERTISING SVCS, OS-01-01 175. 00 )~ 103 135 1311. 9' 164 LYNGATE PRINTING CO. PRIfdT1NG SERVICES 05-01-01 1311. 92 ! 103736 62. 42 170 LYNW01]D REI'JTAL CENTER RENTAL. SVCS. 05--01-01 62. 42 ,' , ,~ iD3737 10 7 3 38 25. ~ ~5 DO 0 3355 9 999 9 DR. CARLLIS MANI_APA2 ARIA MEDIWA PLApINING COMh1 4/10 ARN ING 05-O1-Oi 25 00 I i . , /REFUND OS-01-U1 25. 00 ~ 103739 100. 00 99999 MARLA FORRE5T-CPPA TREASIINER MEMDER5HIP DUES 05~-01-01 100 OD "j ' 103740 1182. 60 179 MARX DR05 FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVCS. 05-01-01 . 1182. 60 I " ~ 103741 25. 00 184 JULIO MENDOZA RECREATION CDM11 3/27 OS-01-O1 25. 00 I " 103742 3470. 40 4146 MITCHELL PERSONNEL SVC TEMPORARY SVCS. 05-01-01 3470. 40 ! ~'"' 103743 461. 73 827 M °~ M AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 05-U1-O1 461. 73 "~ ! 103744 550. 00 1012 MOD SYSTEMS RENTAL SVCS. 05-01-01 550. 00 ~ '0 103745 500. 00 99999 MONICA CERVANTES REFUND/DATEMAN HALL OS-01-DI 500. .. 00 " _ 103746 __ ____ 50_ 00 __4.9.999 MUNICIPAL EDUIPMENT MAINT DUES ~ SUDSCRIPTION 05--01-01 50. 00 5x 103747 1369, 50 727 MYRON MANUFACTURING CORP. PROMOTIONAL 5VC5. 05-O1-D1 1369. 50 sa 103748 14515. 34 973 NATIDEJWIDE ENVIRONMEEJTAL SVCS. TRASH PICK UP OS-O1-U1 14;15. :14 !"' 103749 470. 00 99999 fJAT10NAL RESOURCE CTR. MEMDER5HIP DUES 05-01-01 470. 00 '• -' 103750 1843. 00 4289 N t D FIRE PROTECTION, INC. CONSTRUCTION 5VC5. OS-O1-Ol 1893. 00 j' a6 I 103751 139. 86 3553 NE%TEL COMMUNICATION TELEPHONE SERVICES 05-01-01 139 86 '; . ~ la II WARRAPIT DATE: 05--01- C I T Y of 01 L Y N W O D D ~ W A R Ft A N T R E G I 5 T E R PA GE, 6 ' 'I WARRAI'JTN ANOIJNT VEN[iURB VEIJDOR NAME DESCkIPT10N 1NV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT i" 1.03752 103753 9422,57 1.132 OFFICE DEPOT _ ~~ OFFICE SUPPLIES OS-01-01 9422 57 103754 2Gb.lf1 3747 ORANGE- COUNTY REGISTER ADI+£R7ISING SVGS. 05-O1-01 206 . 10 . 103755 17464. 0(I :70.00 9p6 F'. E R. 5. 893 PAGEAhJTRY PROPS ' D RETIREMENT 3/:31 OS-O1 D1 17464 . .00 . ! 103756 221.02 -< • ECOR 407 PARK WATER COMFAhJY AWHRD5 OS-01-O1 270 .00 103757 25,00 3315 RITA PAT£L MEDIAN ISLAND r-. 0~ OL O] 22 1 . 0` 103758 25.00 3543 NANNY PEREZ PLANNING CUMM 4/10 US-O1-O1 25 .00 103759 351.pD 206 PERVO PAINF COMPANY RECREATION 3/27 05-DI-O1 25 .00 ''~ j', 103760 3391.64 Ci151 DRFNDA J F'ETERSCIN PAINT SUPPLIES OS-O1-O1 351 .00 ' I 103761 217.97 , 207 PETTV f ASH PRINTING SERVICES US-O1-O1 3391 .64 "' 103762 25.00 , 1598 DONALD PR11hMER REIMDURSFMF.NT OS-O1-O1 217 ,97 103763 983.71 1084 GVALITY AUTO 7 RECREATION 3/x_7 05-O1-01 25 .00 `0I 103764 148.81 4179 OUINTEX WIRELESS AUTO PARTS 05-01-01 983 .71 ~ " 103765 56..40 221 RAPID PUDI ISHING TELEPHONE SERVICES 05-U1-O1 148. 81 ~ '' 103766 25.00 _ 188 LORENE REED ADVERTISING SVGS. OS-01-O1 56. 40 '' 103767 25. DO 3257 WILLARD H REED RECREATION COMM 3/:.7 O5-DI-01 25. 00 z' 1U376D .__54,7;3- . _ 225 RENTERIA AUTO PARTS PLANNING COMM 4/10 ' 05-01-01 25. DO I" 103769 48.68 .. 4083 RICE E~ SONS AUTO PART S DS-U1-O1 54. 73 ~~~ '~ ze 103770 2422 24 1230 5 9 J SUPPLY CO AUTO PARTS OS-O1-O1 48. 6p ~~! Z' 1D3771 450.00 , . 4165 5EMAA OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-O1-Ot 2 0 42,. 24 ;,~ ~ 103772 17338.15 005 SHAN 14 THEVER & ASSOCIATES ENTRY FEEiS LEGAL FEES OS-Ot-O1 450. 00 '" '"I 103773 37.60 42"!7 SIERRA SPRINGS . fJPERA7ING SUPPLIES US-O1-U1 17338. 15 ~ 103774 300.00 1220 SIMPSOM1I °< SIMPSDN OS-01-O1 37. 60 '' +~ 103775 330.39 1159 SMITH PIPE °~ SUPPLY ACCTC. ASSISTANCE OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-O1-01 300. OD ' 1D3776 382.40 10 SONITROL OF LONG DEACH ALARM SVGS OS-01-01 330. 39 ~,I ' 103777 161, q3 446 SOUTH GATE: CAM[RA . FILM OS-01-Q1 382. 40 ', I"' 103778 567.53 249 SDUTHGATE WHDLE5A1_E ELECTRIC OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-01-O1 U5-01-01 161. 93 103779 336,00 4028 SPONSORED I`1ARKETING INSURANCE CAFETERIA PLAN OS-01-D1 567. 53 103780 103 371.02 4036 STANDARD READY MIX OPERATING SVFPLIES 05-01-01 336, 371 00 02 781 630.00 3788 STATE CONTROLLER'S ANNUAL REPORTS 0 5-01-01 . 103782 107.99 99999 SUCCESSOR[ES OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-01-01 630. 00 103783 850.00 3421 5lJPER DOLLAR WISE AUTO PARTS OS-O1-01 107. 99 ~ ii 103784 2201.29 666 TAJ OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES 850. 00 ~ I 103785 9441,71 4251 TELECOM Pl_AIJIJER5 INC. PROFESSIpNAL SVGS OS-O1-O1 220E 29 '~ 103786,__, 47.85_ - 3931 THE LIGHThI0U5E . AUTO PARTS OS-O1-O1 9441. 71 "' 103787 615.60 436 THE MAGIC ROSE FLORAL SVGS 05-01-01 47. 85 „ 103788 200.00 239 TRENCH SNORING . TRENCH SVGS OS-O1-01 615. 60 103789 __ _. 4700.00 _4256 TRUE GREEN LANDCARE . TREE REMOVAL OS-01-O1 2 00. 00 ~~ 103790 55100.21 2'19 U. 5. DANK LEASE/DEDT SVC PYMT OS-O1-O1 4700. 00 ,I ]03741 141,75 254 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT UNDE:RGRDUND SVC WORK 05-O1-G1 55100. 21 ("'j "' 103792 1249,67 3697 UNISOURCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-U1-O1 OS-O1-O1 141. 75 ~ ~ ~ 103793 5163.33 100 UNITED RENTALS RENTAL SVGS 1249. 67 I •°' 103794 108004.46 4101 U5S CAL DUILUERS~ INC. . CONSTRUCTION SVC S OS-O1-O1 5163. 33 , s' 103745__-____ __..-.,__,.41..89_ __99999 VERIZON . TELEPHONE SVC S OS-01-O1 1Op004. 4b 'I + 'z' !' 103796 78.46 99999 VERIZON . c TELEPHONE SERVICES 05-01-01 41. 89 i ~ " 103797 65.00 99999 WALT'S TOIJ SERVICE TDIJING SVC S 05-U1-O1 78. 46 ~i~ 103798 687.57 4038 WASTE MANMAGEMENT COf1PTON . TRASH COLLECTION OS-01-O1 05-01-01 p5. 00 '~ ' 103799 125.73 3707 WASTE MANAGEMENT PORTADLE TOILET 05-D1-O1 687. 57 ', , ~ 1038D0 530,31 191 WAVE COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING SVGS OS-O1-01 125. 73 ~' _ .. _ _ . _ _ 530. 31 I. , , I@ I~~ ' ~ WANRAhd7 DATE: OS-O1-O1 ~~ I' 41AItNAN1N ,, AMOUI'dl V[NTiCIRN VF,NUOft NAME "~ 103801 187, 48 49999 WEST GROUP 1D3802 112, 99 99999 WE5T9URNf_' SIJPPI_Y INC ,~ 103803 214. 00 . 293 WESTERN EXfEHMINATOR 103'1(x04 25. Oi) 1604 RODNEY WHITE: 103(:105 62. 6i1 1419 WHITE CAP 103806 248G. 25 307 YOUNG PL:OPLE OF LYNWI'IOU ]038D7 91. 15 4259 ZAP MANVFACTDRING INC 103808 773. 32 . 309 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES. INC. 1346764. 15 C I T Y of L Y N W O O D W ARRAN T R E G I S T E R UE5CRIPTIgN UllE5 °~ SUDSCRIPTIDN OPERATING SUPPLIES EXTERMINATING SVGS, TRAf~EIC COMI'1 3/2?_ F.IPERATING SUPPLIES ALLEY CLEAN UP 5VC'S OPERATING SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES PAGE: 7 INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT OS-01-O1 187. 48 C15 -O 1-01 1 12. 88 OS-O1-D1 214. 00 OS-O1-01 25. 00 05-01-01 62, 60 05-01-01 2486. 25 OS-O1-O1 291. 15 O 5-01--01 773. 32 1346764.15 PREPAID: 102050~10~067~102079~102463,103459-103558 SPOILED: 103559-103645,103695-103702 VOIDS; -•., IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILE~~ P~~ PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN TH ` ~_~ ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. FJ `°' ~ ~ ~` `= " ;; ;'~ ~~ ! YNt"i0'JU AGENDA , ' ~~ ';t.t=..;~.s c:,^; ICE ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON April 30, 2001 BATEMAN HALL 8:00 A.M. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS III CITY CLERK ANDREA L. HOOPER ~•i$ ~~:~ ~~ ~C V ~. ~-~~ ARTURO REYES COUNCILMEMBER ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY ATTORNEY SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY TREASURER IRIS PYGATT OPENING CEREMONIES CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards, II 3. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5.) -, 4. STRATEGIC PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC WORKS Lynwood Shines 2001 Imperial Highway Project PUBLIC SAFETY - LA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT Public Scale DUI Checkpoints CLOSED SESSION 5. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS A. With respect to every item of business to be discussed in closed session pursuant to Section 54956.9: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Name of Case: Karla Cortes v. City of Lynwood ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 1, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM, CITY HALL, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. AGENDA ~~ ~ ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION ---, ~ ~~~-~.~ -- ~~~~, AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CfTY of LYMv~ooU LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON : o~~-~, ~~ ~_~{, J or; iCE i April 25, 2001 BATEMAN HALL 8:00 A.M. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM ~~~ ~~ ~I~ ~~ ~~~ . ARTURO REYES COUNCILMEMBER LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS III CITY CLERK ANDREA L. HOOPER ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY ATTORNEY SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY TREASURER IRIS PYGATT OPENING CEREMONIES 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards, II 3. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5.) ~a, 4. STRATEGIC PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC WORKS Update on the Capital Improvement Projects RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES Redesigned City Anniversary Logo CLOSED SESSION NONE ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 1, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM, CITY HALL, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS, CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON April 23, 2001 BATEMAN HALL 9:00 A.M. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS III CITY CLERK ANDREA L. HOOPER ~~~ ~~~ .~El.cl'V t~.~ CITY OF LYNVJOOU CITY CIFRi<S nF~IGE '~`~ ~6~ 8 sa , ~1 U ~~ Ci ~~ ~ ~ J ARTURO REYES COUNCILMEMBER ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY ATTORNEY SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY TREASURER IRIS PYGATT OPENING CEREMONIES 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards, II 3. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. {The Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5.) ..~, 4. STRATEGIC PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC WORKS Update on the Capital Improvement Projects RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES Redesigned City Anniversary Logo 5. CITIZEN OF THE MONTH PROGRAM Comments: The Mayor and Members of the Lynwood City Council have always recognized the citizens and business members in the City of Lynwood that have striven to improve the quality of life in our community. On Tuesday, January 20, 1998 at their regularly scheduled meeting, the Lynwood City Council approved the "Citizen of the Month" program criteria and its budget. Due to other methods of acknowledging community members via means other than the "Citizen of the Month" program staff had not focused on this program for a number of months. Staff has recognized the opportunity to give the program a marketing overhaul and to republicize it to the community as the "Remarkable Acts of Kindness" program. The funding to conduct this program is within the existing budget for the Recreation & Community Services Department. Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests that the Honorable Mayor and Members of the Lynwood City Council review and file this report. CLOSED SESSION 6. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS A. With respect to every item of business to be discussed in closed session pursuant to Section 54956.9: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Name of Case: McCloud v. City of Lynwood, et al ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 1, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM, CITY HALL, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. r~ MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor From: Ralph W. Davis, I By: Jim Given, Direct Date: Apri12~, 2001 Members of the Lynwood City Council i~Manager 1,~,~„ti~j7/ Recreation & Community Services Subject: Citizen of the Mo~ith Program Background '" The Honorable Mayor and Members of the Lynwood City Council have promoted the identification and recognition of citizens and business members in the City of Lynwood that have given of themselves to improve the quality of life in our community. Facts 1. At the regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, December 9, 1997 then Mayor Armando Rea instructed staff to bring back a report and proposal identifying an appropriate mechanism by which the City Council of the City of Lynwood could honor citizens in the community. 2. At the regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, December 16, 1997 the City Council adopted the "Citizen of the Month" program in concept and instructed staff to prepare and bring back for their approval a program and corresponding program budget. 3. At the regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, January 20, 1998 the City Council approved the final program and adopted the budget for the "Citizen of the Month" program. 4. The program criteria approved by the City Council: a. Citizens were acknowledged for such community involvement as; participation on a City of Lynwood Board or Commission, participation in a volunteer capacity in a program such as serving youth or senior citizens for a protracted length of time, participation and/or support of a local non profit corporation, service club or related organization that benefits the citizens of this community, to go above and beyond the call of duty to prevent harm and/or save a life of someone, provide financial support to a worthy cause benefiting this community. b. Citizens are nominated by fellow citizens or City of Lynwood staff members via the completion of an application form. c. Staff of the Recreation & Community Services Department then review the application for completeness and get any necessary clarification of information needed for the reviewing committee to make an appropriate decision relative to the merit of the application. d. The Community Affairs Commission was identified by the City Council as the body by which the nomination would be made to the City Council. e. The nominations would then be reviewed and approved by the City Council. f. Citizens who were identified and approved as honorees are then honored via the receipt of a plaque at a subsequent regularly scheduled City Council meeting. g. The categories that were identified included; individual, school/educator, business, community/group. h. Attached please find original application form along with criteria cover sheet. 5 Page 2 Analysis With the number of events, activities and related acknowledgements of community members via means other than the "Citizen of the Month" program staff had not focused on this program for a number of months. For this reason, staff met and saw the opportunity to give the program a marketing overhaul and then to republicize it to the community. The program had evolved to a program that occurred on a quarterly basis rather than on a monthly basis. In addition, staff felt it important to focus on the fact that this program is much more than just a "citizen of the month" program. We wanted to focus more on what persons and/or organizations were being honored for, "a remarkable act of kindness" (Please see the attached application form}. The funding to conduct this program is within the existing budget for the Recreation & Community Services Department. Conclusion/Recommendation Staff respectfully requests that the Honorable Mayor and Members of the Lynwood City Council review and file this report. Attachments 1. Original program criteria cover sheet 2. Original application form 3. Revised application form JG:JS ccitem~remarkable act of kindness 4.23.01 CITIZEN OF THE MONTH NOMINATION APPLICATION (criteria) All citizens, employees, civic or cultural organizations, educators and business persons are invited to submit nominations for the City of Lynwood Citizen of The Month. The Lynwood Citizen Of The Month Program is designed to formally recognize those persons who have provided extraordinary service and/or leadership contributing to the quality of life in our community. All nominations must be in writing and submitted using the following information: 1. Name and Address of Nominee 2. Past and present information.as to the community involvement of the Nominee, showing as much information as possible. 3. Candidates for Award can be Nominated in any one of four categories; Individual, School/Educator, Business, or Community/Group. 4. Nominations for consideration must be submitted prior to second Thursday of each month. 5. Application must indicate for which month candidate is to be considered for Citizen of the Month. To Nominate someone for Citizen of the Month, just fill out the nomination form. Nominators may be contacted for. additional information on finalists in each category. If you like, you may include or send one additional page of information. Winners will be contacted usually during the third-fourth week of the month. Monthly recognition awards will be presented by the Mayor and Lynwood City Council on the second Tuesday of each month. Winners in each category will be eligible for the Lynwood Citizen of the Year Awards. a City of Lynwood Citizen Of The Month Awards Nomination Application Name of Nominee Nominee Address City State Zip Phone Month for Nomination to be Considered Your Name Your Address City State Zip Award Categories (check one}: [ j Individual [ J SchooVEducator [ ]Business [ J Community/Group Please use the space below to clearly outline the achievements of the Nominee. Attach any relevant background material and letters of support. As complete a review of the nominees achievements as possible is appreciated: Closing date for nominations is the second Thursday of each month. Return to: City of Lynwood 11330 Bullis Rd., Lynwood, CA 90262 (310) 603-0220, extension 319 Signature recreatnlccitemlcitizen2.doc Date -, "'~ ~ ~ earutu~crtit~ S~ 1`~epantr,wterrz .`~~ceaenta REMARKABLE ACTS OF KINDNESS PROGRAM __ _ _ __ The Recreation & Community Services Department is pleased to announce a program that recognizes individual members of the community who have demonstrated an act of kindness. PERFORMING A GOOD DEED EXTENDING A HELPING HAND BEING A POSITIVE ROLE MODEL PROMOTING UNITY VOLUNTEERING If someone you know has demonstrated an act of kindness they would not normally be recognized for, Recreation & Community Services Department wants to know about it! Nomination Form P{ease complete the following information about the person you are nominating: (One nominee per farm). Name: _ Address: Lynwood, CA 90262 Phone: or Age if not an adult: Relationship to Nominator. Reason for Nomination: Nominator, please camp{ete information below about yourself: Name: Address: Lynwood, CA 90262 Phone: or Age if not an adult: Relationship to Nominee: Do we have your permission to use your name on the letter to nominee? Yes No ** Your nominee will receive a letter of recognition and a certificate for their deed** Nominator's Signature: Date: Everyone matters in Lynwood Mail entry to: City of Lynwood Recreation & Community services Department Ambassador's Program 11301 Bullis Road Lynwood, CA 90262 Or fax to: (310) 537-7603 For more information piease caii (310) 886457 or (310) 603-0220 Ext. 619 ~~~ . ~~t~~ O~ ~YN~ooD ~MEf',C• Ci~~ ~~''~~ -.r4 City ,,Fleeting Ctin~~enges ~ 11330 BULLIS ROAD I IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. ~ f'~-~,{ AGENDA ~ ~' ~ ~' ~ 6 '•` ~~~ - ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION C~T'r p~ ~ ~: `~.. -,- ^ITY .^; . , AT THE MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON APRIL 17, 2001 ; ~~ ~ , COUNCIL CHAMBERS' 6:00 P.M. ~"° PAUL H. RICHARDS, II i~jLi,G~GR~ -, MAYOR '~ ARTURO REYES ~ RICARDO SANCHEZ COUNCILMEMBER MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS III CITY CLERK ANDREA L. HOOPER OPENING CEREMONIES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards. II CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK CITY TREASURER IRIS PYGATT 6. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATION a) La Quinta Johnson, Gold Award Girl Scout b) The Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science Head Start Awareness Month c) YWCA -Sexual Assault Awareness Month in Lynwood 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS 8. COUNCIL RECESS TO: LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LYNWOOD INFORMATION INC- LYNWOOD PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CITY ATTORNEY SHAN TH~VER & ASSOCIATES •-~•. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIAL DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ratph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5. ) 9. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS: Special Meeting, March 15, 2001 Special Meeting, March 26, 2001 Special Meeting, April 2, 2001 Regular Meeting, April 3, 2001 Special Meeting, April 5, 2001 Special Meeting, April 9, 2001 PUBLIC HEARING 10. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DDA) BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (THE "AGENCY") AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC. Comments: To conduct a joint Public Hearing regarding a proposed Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) between the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") and Access Community Housing, a non-profit Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) for the purpose of developing three (3) single family dwellings on Agency owned property located at 4353, 4357 and 4361 Fernwood Avenue. Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a joint Public Hearing, and after receiving public oral and written comments to close the Public Hearing, and adopt the following resolutions: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., ANON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (SEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA) A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING INC., A NON PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., A NON PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. (SEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA) A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., A NON PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. 11. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2000-03 & ZONE CHANGE N0.2000-02 APPLICANT -HERB CHILDS Comments: To conduct a Public Hearing in order to consider General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03, to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Commercial to Single-Family Residential; and Zone Change No. 2000-02 to change the zoning from P-1 (Parking) to R-1 (Single-Family Residential). Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a Public Hearing and after considering public oral and written comments to close the Public Hearing and adopt the attached resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2000-01 and adopt the attached ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-02. 12. APPEAL NO. 2001-02 - REQUEST TO OVERTURN THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-03; CHANGING THE LYNWOOD PLAZA ZONING FROM CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) TO C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL); AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-31; AN EXPANSION OF THE EL FARALLON RESTAURANT AND DANCE HALL LOCATED AT 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD. Comments: To conduct a Public Hearing in order to consider Appeal No. 2001-02, regarding the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; applications to change the zoning at Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to City of Lynwood-3 (Heavy Commercial); and approve a 2,890 square foot expansion to the EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall located at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a Public Hearing and after considering public oral and written comments to close the Public Hearing and choose one of the following options: 1) Adopt the resolution to APPROVE Appeal No. 2001-02 and overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, thereby denying Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. 2) Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and introduce the attached ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 and adopt the attached resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. 3) Direct staff to draft a Zoning Ordinance Amendment and thereby table the appeal, Zone change and Conditional Use Permit. 4) Continue the Public Hearing and direct staff. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Council or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 13. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION THE 2000 PARK BOND ACT, PROPOSITION 12 Comments: The State of California Park Bond Act of 2000 is the largest Park Bond Act in the U.S. History. The Bond provides $2.1 billion under various programs to state and local agencies for the acquisition, development, rehabilitation, and restoration of park and recreation areas and facilities. The City of Lynwood would receive approximately $629,000 for the Per Capita Programs and would be able to participate in other Competitive Grant Programs. Recommendation: To recommends for the City Council to receive and file staff's report relative to the 2000 Park Bond Act. 14. PROPOSED WATER LINE UPGRADE PROJECTS Comments: The City's water lines are over 60 years old and in need of upgrades. There are about 90 miles of water lines in the City water system. To keep the system operating efficiently the City has had an on-going water line upgrade project for the past several years. The City's Water Master Plan recommended upgrading several of the water lines throughout the City. The following priority list was developed to coincide with the street improvement projects listed in the CIP Program: • Alameda St. (Butler to Fernwood) • Cedar Ave. (School to Bullis) • Santa Fe/State (Lynwood to Euclid) • Carlin Ave. (Waldorf to Atlantic) • Virginia Ave. (School to Bullis) • School St. (Josephine to Cedar) Recommendation: To recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE WATER MAIN UPGRADE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO APPROPRIATE AND TRANSFER $1,7000,000.00 OF UNAPPROPRIATED WATER FUND TO THE WATER MAIN UPGRADE PROJECT". 15. WARRANT REGISTER: Comments: City of Lynwood warrant register for April 17, 2001 Recommendation: Staff recommends for the City Council to approve the warrant register. 4 DISCUSSION ITEMS 16. REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT - ST. EMYDIUS CHURCH FESTIVAL MAY 18T" THRU MAY 20T" Comments: St. Emydius Church is requesting a Special Permit to have a Festival on the ground of the church May 18`" through May 20`", 2001 The Festival is being held to enable the Church to accept students who do not have the resources to pay their school expenses. Recommendation: Council review and direct staff accordingly. COUNCIL ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION PAUL H. RICHARDS, II, MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ, MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD, COUNCILMEMBER ARMANDO REA, COUNCILMEMBER ARTURO REYES, COUNCILMEMBER CLOSED SESSION 17. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS A. With respect to every item of business to be discussed in closed session pursuant to Section 54956.9: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Name of Case: Diaz v. City of Lynwood, et al B. With respect to every item of business to be discussed in closed session pursuant to Section 54956.9: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Name of Case: McCloud v. City of Lynwood, et al ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 1, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS' OF THE CITY HALL, 11330 BULLIS ROAD, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. 5 ~ ~~ LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TOWN HALL SPECIAL MEETING MARCH 15, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Town Hall Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 6:35 p.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Rea, Reyes, Sanchez and Richards answered the roll call. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, and City Clerk Hooper. City Treasurer Pygatt was absent. City Clerk Hooper announced that the agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Item# 4: STAFF PRESENTATION CONCERNING THE PUBLIC SAFETY IMPACTS OF THE LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTS FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Mayor Richards welcomed everyone and discussed the Facilities Master Plan issued by the Lynwood Unified School District as it relates to the building of additional schools in the Lynwood School District. The Lynwood School District plans to construct five (5) new schools, expand four (4) existing schools, and renovate the other schools. The Town Hall Meeting was called to discuss the City's concerns regarding the possible adverse environmental impacts, the loss of Ham Park, the possible loss of homes, negative impacts on public safety services and recreational programming, and the possible increased cost burden to Lynwood residents and businesses. Mayor Richards went on to discuss these issues and introduce City Manager Davis who presented the audience with presentations from Staff on the negative impacts associated with the School Districts Facilities Master Plan. Staff Presentations: Jesus Burciaga -Assistant Fire Chief, L.A. County Fire Presented a videotape on the L.A. County Fire Department. Also stated that the school occupancy is a major concern. Stated their response times will have to be re-evaluated to respond to the new schools. Also stated there will definitely be an increased need for additional resources for a new station. Mike Herek -Lieutenant, Century Sheriffs Station Presented a videotape on the Sheriffs Station. Lieutenant Herek discussed the current traffic safety program and problems and how parking and pedestrian problems drain the City's resources. Joe Wang -Director of Public Works Stated that Public Works is concerned about the increased impact on city streets, also discussed current traffic problems and the chaos in the mornings and afternoons around present schools, also the parking situations and the pedestrian's right of way. Stated AGENDA I~'8M that all of these situations have to be resolved to help prevent any accidents. We will also need more crossing guards for the new schools. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Rea stated he is very upset with the Lynwood Unified School District. Also stated the School District has failed to address these issues over the years and the conditions at Lynwood schools are deplorable. Stated he also wants new schools and better education for Lynwood kids. Stated our mission is to create a safe, clean and well-balanced environment for everyone in Lynwood. Stated the School District has not been forthright with their plans. Councilman Reyes stated he is not against education. Stated residents are being driven out of their homes. Stated the Board and the City Council need to get together and work this issue out. Councilman Byrd stated that we are a community and working together education is the Key. Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez discussed the Town Hall meeting and the fact that it is Council's duty to inform residents of what is happening in their community. Stated Lynwood needs better schools and better education. Stated the City cares about the students. Stated the City is willing to work with the School District on this issue. Also stated that the Farallion Restaurant is a very destructive business. Mayor Richards stated we need to plan wisely and we need planning and reasoning. Stated the city has had no input on the School Districts plan to increase schools and that this endeavor must be a collaborative effort. Stated the District and consultants need a clear understanding of what the city vision is. Extended his hand to the School District and Members again. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Frank Calderon - Stated that he thinks everyone in this Community should be aware of everything that is going on in the City and in the School Board District. Irene Garcia - Is against the new schools, and is very upset with the School District. Jesus Uribe - Stated that he is very concern with the way the City Council is using the City's money. Janet - Is against the new schools. Resident - Is very proud of the City Council, would also tike for the School District and the City Council to come to an understanding. Ernesto Valenzuela - Stated he is very concern with the Community, and the condition's of the City streets. Agustin Tovilar - Stated that he is a pastor of ten (10) years, and is very disgusted with the schools here in Lynwood stated he has never seen such dirty schools in his entire life. .-• ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez and carried to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MARCH 26, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 9:20 a.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Reyes, Sanchez and Richards answered the roll call. Councilman Byrd and Rea were absent. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, City Clerk Hooper, and City Treasurer Pygatt. City Clerk Hooper announced that the agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. PUBLIC ORALS COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding agenda items only) NONE PUBLIC ORALS COMMUNICATIONS NONE ITEM# 8 PRESENTATION OF HARDSCAPE (STREET FURNITURE INCLUDING BUS SHELTER) BY CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL DE MOBILIARIO UNRBANO INC. Carlos presented to the Lynwood City Council the information on a variety of Street Furniture designs including bus shelters for consideration to be installed within the City boundaries. Pedro explained to Council the Guidelines of the Bus Shelters Product. Councilman Rea arrived at 9:25 a.m. Councilman Sanchez questioned the sitting capacity of the Bus Shelters. Councilman Reyes questioned the standard charge of this product. Carlos explained to Council the proposal terms. Councilman Byrd arrived at 9:40 a.m. City Manager Davis stated he would like for Council to review the proposal terms. Community Development Director Gary Chicots stated he would like for Council to negotiate a agreement with the Outdoor Sites Inc. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez, seconded by Councilman Byrd to negotiate a agreement with the outdoor Sites Inc. ROLL CALL: AYES: BYRD, NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS CLOSED SESSION City Attorney Thever stated with respect to every item of business to be discussed in Closed Session pursuant to Section 54956.9: A) City of Lynwood & Cal Trans B} Anticipated Litigation C) Case: Daiz v. City of Lynwood D) Los Angeles Sheriff Department -Century Station It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Rea and carried to recess to a Joint Closed Session with Lynwood Redevelopment Agency at 9:55 a.m. Council reconvened at 11:30 a.m. City Attorney Thever stated Council met on the aforementioned matters and on Item# 13 A) No reportable action, Item# B) Continue to Next regular meeting, ftem# C) No reportable action, and on Item# D) No reportable action. Mayor Richards reordered Item# 10 -Naming Soccer Field in Honor of the late George Martini. ITEM# 10 NAMING OF SOCCER FIELD IN HONOR OF THE LATE GEORGE MARTINI Staff requested naming Soccer Field #3 in Honor of the late Mr. George Martini. ITEM# 12 AUTO ALLOWANCE Councilman Reyes stated he would like more information on the Auto Allowance Item. Councilman Rea stated he also would like more information concerning the Auto Allowance Resolution. It was moved by Councilman Byrd to adopt Resolution, and died for a lack of a second. By general consent ITEM# 4 -STRATEGIC PLAN & IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM ITEM# 5 -DUI CHECKPOINTS -ITEM# 6 -COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ENFORCEMENT -ITEM# 7 -PARKING METERS -ITEM# 9 -CITY OF LYNWOOD 80thANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION and -ITEM# 12 -AUTO ALLOWANCE to be continued. ITEM# 11 DIAL A RIDE PROGRAM COMPARISON Senior Services Supervisor Phyllis Cooper presented a brief presentation to the Council on the current Dial A Ride Program for the City. Victor also gave a brief presentation to the Council from Fiesta Taxi Company. It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to negotiate between the Fiesta Taxi Company and the City of Lynwood. ROLL CALL: AYES: BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez and carried to adjourn the meeting at 12:20 p.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 2, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 8:15 a.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Reyes, Sanchez and Richards answered the roll call for all agencies. Councilman Rea was absent. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever and City Treasurer Pygatt. City Clerk Hooper was absent. Project Manager Jackson announced that the agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE Item #5: City of Lynwood 80th Anniversary Celebration • City of Lynwood 80th Anniversary Celebration Staff recommended that the City Council authorize the following actions: 1. Formation of an 80th Anniversary Committee 2. Review input relative to the recommended slate of programs and related 80th Anniversary issues as presented to staff 3. Appropriate $139,700 from unappropriated General Fund balance via the adoption of the attached resolution for the implementation of programs and issues associated with the 80th Anniversary in Lynwood Mayor Richards suggested the parade route be Cesar Chavez Lane. After discussion it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2001.036 ENTITLED• `A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROPRIATING ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED GENERAL FUND BALANCE TO CONDUCT PROGRAMS IN HONOR OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD'S 80T" ANNIVERSARY" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN REA Item #6: DUl Checkpoints Item held over until next meeting. Item #7: Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Item held over until next meeting. City Clerk Hooper arrived at 8:20 a.m. Councilman Rea arrived at 8:22 a.m. CLOSED SESSION With respect to every item of business to be discussed in Closed Session pursuant to Section 54957.6: • 11 a. Conference with Labor Negotiator o Employee Organization: Lynwood City Employees Association/ S.E.I.U. Local 347 It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to recess to Closed Session at 8:35 a.m. Council reconvened at 9:13 a.m. City Attorney Thever stated Council met on the aforementioned matter and stated: • 11 a. No Reportable Action Item #8: Parkin Meters Kathy Beal, Code Enforcement Manager presented Council with statistics and various city's surveys relating to parking meters. Mayor Richards asked staff to prepare a map and schedule a field meeting for next Wednesday or Thursday to survey the areas tentatively designated for meters. Item #9: Auto Allowance After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes to adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2001.037 ENTITLED• "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING AUTO ALLOWANCES FOR IDENTIFIED POSITIONS" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REYES, RICHARDS NOES: COUNCILMEN REA, SANCHEZ ABSENT: NONE In a subsequent motion it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to increase the City Treasurers auto allowance bringing it in parody with the City Clerks auto allowance. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 2 .~, Item #10: Recommended date for the 2001 Memorial Da Program After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to approve Thursday, May 24, 2001 for the presentation of the Memorial Day program as recommended by the Veterans Affairs Council. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE PRESENTATIONS CITY LOGO Johanna Howard of Media Services presented Council with several options for the city's 80th anniversary birthday celebration. Council selected logos #3 and #4 to be reworked and brought back for approval. EMPLOYEE ID BADGES Gail Black, Human Resources Manager presented Council with several designs for employee badges. Council selected a design and asked that the suggested changes be made and then brought back to Council for approval. COUNCIL ORALS Council asked Joe Wang, Public Works Director what is the status of the Natatorium project. Joe stated the project is moving very slowly. Contractor is being assessed $500 per day in late charges. Staff is continuing to push the contractor to comply. Councilman Rea asked staff to look into incorporating a service fee to be paid to the City of Lynwood by the Tow Service providers. Would like to see this implemented only on checkpoints (i.e. drunk driving, DUI, seatbelt). Suggested a flat service fee. ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to adjourn the meeting at 10:10 a.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL2.2001 C .•. ..., LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 3, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Regular Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 6:20 p.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Rea, Reyes, Sanchez and Richards answered the joint roll call for all agencies. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, City Clerk Hooper and City Treasurer Pygatt. City Clerk Hooper announced that the agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Item #6: Presenfations /Proclamations • Earthquake Preparedness Proclamation • Plaque received from Compton Fire Department • Award of Bravery to Deputy Michael Yocum -Century Station It was moved by Councilman Rea, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to approve the Presentations/Proclamations. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Jack Keen ~- Discussed the pledge of allegiance, equality for hourly employees and the homicide of Eugene Wilson. Rod White - 4608 Carlin Avenue Updated Council on the Park Water increase. Stated the PUC granted a 6.3% increase in March of 2000, and were asking fora 19'h % increase over the next three years. Stated Park Water is the highest water in the area. Residents are now paying $1.91 per unit and will increase to $2.22 over the next three years. Asked Council to write letters to the Public Utility Commission appealing the rate increase. Stated residents want better service than what they are receiving. Mayor Richards asked if the settlement is final. City Manager Davis stated that staff would evaluate and support an appeal for the increase. Mr. White also discussed the March 20~h School District meeting. Asked why the School District schedules a meeting the same time that City Council had scheduled a meeting. Asked did the School District schedule the meeting to divide the community? Discussed the money the school district is suppose to receive, and asked if the monies could be put into an escrow account until all of the issues have been resolved. Discussed garage conversions and stated that conversions may be one of the reasons for the overcrowding of schools. Irene Garcia - 2737 111th Street Thanked Council for recognizing her at the recent Women's Commission program. Complained about the "for sale" automobiles being sold on Long Beach Boulevard on the street. Asked why we have laws when they are not enforced. Proposed to Council her desires to have all candidates for the upcoming election prove U.S. citizenship. Sal Alatorre - 3185 Oakwood Discussed the celebration of Cesar Chavez's birthday in Lynwood. Suggested renaming Bullis Road after Chavez. Discussed DUI checkpoints and suggested adding an additional day. Stated it is a good program. Resident - Stated Cesar Chavez deserves a street in Lynwood named after him. Irene Garcia - 2737 111th Street Discussed new street being named after Cesar Chavez and the financial impact on businesses having to change their letterhead and literature to accommodate a name change. Pricilla White -Abbott Elementary Invited everyone to the Abbott Elementary Family Math Night Wednesday, April 11th from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. Stated their goal is to get everyone involved in math and also helps parents assist their children with their math homework. Mayor Richards discussed conversations about the monies the school district is being funded for new schools. Stated there is no guarantee of any sum of monies, and that all funding requires plan approval. Discussed joint planning with the school district. Also discussed year round schools and volunteer programs. Stated these ideas may ease classroom space. Councilman Byrd discussed year-round schools and the fact that he was told there have been times when at least 27 teaches have been absent at one school in a day. Mayor Richards also asked staff about the new legislation declaring Cesar Chavez's birthday a state holiday. Asked staff to bring back an Ordinance observing Cesar Chavez birthday as a legal holiday. Discussed Cesar Chavez Lane and the recent tribute at the park and the rededication of the monument at the park. Stated Cesar Chavez Lane is not an alley as suggested earlier and each year it will be enhanced. Item #9: Minutes of Previous Meetings It was moved by Councilman Rea, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to approve: • Special Meeting March 14, 2001 • Special Meeting March 19, 2001 • Regular Meeting March 20, 2001 PUBLIC HEARING NONE CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Council or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. • Councilman Rea pulled Item #10. It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to adopt: Item #7 7: Ordinance -Second Reading ORDINANCE NO. 1504 ENTITLED: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING AND ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT AREA "A" REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO EXTEND THE USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR REAL PROPERTY IN THE PROJECT AREA "A" PROJECT AREA" Item #12: City Treasurer's Quarterly Report The City Treasurer recommends the Council receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ending December 31, 2000. Item #73: Warrant Register RESOLUTION NO. 2001.038 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ALLOWING AND APPROVING THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS THEREFORE" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Pulled for Discussion: Item #70: Proposed vacation of the first a/ley west of Alexander Avenue north of Imperial Hiohway Councilman Rea stated he was not prepared to vote on the Item. Stated there was no documentation from Public Works declaring the necessity to close the alley. Considers the vacation of the alley a gift of public funds and does not support giving away land. Public Works Director Joe Wang stated this Item is to set the Public Hearing only. Although staff had assumed that the property had been vacated, the County Assessors Office found no documents of vacation on record with their office. This Item is to remedy the problem from eight years ago when the area was fenced in and vacated. Stated the records were never processed. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to set a hearing to discuss this matter. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: COUNCILMAN REA ABSENT: NONE DISCUSSION ITEMS Item #74: Notice of Preparation from fhe Los Angeles Unified School District to perform an Environmental Impact Report Public Works Director Joe Wang stated that this item is a result of the Los Angeles School Districts Environmental Impact Report as it relates to Lynwood, and the construction of new schools in the L.A. School District bordering Lynwood boundaries. Issues to be addressed include noise, traffic, hazardous materials, and air quality. An analysis of traffic circulation will also be included. Councilman Reyes thanked the City of Los Angeles for notifying Lynwood. Stated the Lynwood Unified School District gave the City no notice of intent to expand their school district. Asked the City Manager to forward a copy of the report to the Superintendent of Lynwood schools to show them the correct process. Grant Taylor, Community Development Planning Manager stated they are reviewing the Environmental Impact Study and any possible negative impacts it would cause for Lynwood. Stated Lynwood has until April 6th to formally respond to the draft EIR. Item #75: Request for Special Pem~it -Fiesta De Ahorros Food 4 Less stores is requesting permission to have a "Fiesta De Ahorros" in the parking lot of the market Saturday, April 21, 2001. It was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Sanchez and carried to approve the event. Item #16: Request for Special Permit -Car Wash Victory Outreach is requesting permission to conduct car washes at the Lynwood Marketplace from July 2001 through February 2002. Councilman Rea discussed the construction that is about to begin on that sight and the interference it may cause. Stated it presents competition for the established car wash facilities in the city. Asked the City Manager to make an inquiry as to whether this is a special permit or business license. Councilman Reyes requested they purchase a business license. Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez discussed car washes every weekend. Stated it looks like an income earning project. Stated he sees the same people every weekend conducting these car washes. Mayor Richards stated Pastor Leon is a good man and has an outstanding ministry. Stated Victory Outreach does good work. After further discussion, Council asked staff to bring this Item back to the next meeting. Item #7 7: Request for Special Permif -Street Closure St. Emydius Church is requesting permission to have the streets closed from California Avenue to Norton to Martin Luther King Blvd. back to California Avenue for their "Via Crucis Event" on Friday, April 18, 2001. Clerk Hooper stated that St. Emydius changed the street closure to California (in front of the church) to Norton east, to the alley and into the church parking lot. After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to approve the "Via Crucis Event". Item #98: Substantial Chanoe to the HUD Consolidafed Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2000-2009 After discussion it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Rea to approve the substantial change to the Consolidated Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 and adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2001.040 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE CITY'S DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Rea, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to adjourn the meeting a 7:35 p.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL3.2001 C LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 5, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 10:30 a.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Rea, Reyes, Sanchez, and Richards answered the roll call for all agencies. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, and City Clerk Hooper. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE Item #4: Update on the Capital Improvement Projects Item held over until next meeting. Item #5: Parking Meters Staff coordinated a field survey for Council to determine the level of parking meters that can be installed, and to determine the possible locations for installation. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to recess for the Field Tour at 10:55 and adjourn the meeting at 11:30 a.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL5.2001 C LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 9, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 9:10 a.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Reyes, Sanchez and Richards answered the joint roll call for all agencies. Councilman Rea was absent. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, City Clerk Hooper and City Treasurer Pygatt. City Clerk Hooper announced that the agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE Item #4: Budget Amendment Requests It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2001.040 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR FY 2000-2001" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN REA ADDENDUM: Addendum: Negotiafe with Allied Government Services to assisf in identifying and negotiating the terms of drsplaymg advertising protects After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes to authorize the City Manager to negotiate an exclusive agreement with Allied Government Services (AGS) to perform the services of identifying opportunities for projects and negotiating terms and conditions with certain companies for displaying outdoor advertisements. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMAN REA CLOSED SESSION City Attorney Thever stated that with respect to every item of business to be discussed in Closed Session pursuant to Section 54956.9: • Subsequent Need Item: Right of Entry -Homeowners around Ham Park It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to hear Subsequent Need Item: Right of Entry. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to recess to Closed Session at 9:30 a.m. Council reconvened at 10:22 a.m. City Attorney Thever stated Council met on the aforementioned matter and stated on: • Subsequent Need Item: Right of Entry No Reportable Action. Item #5: Re_gulating Fireworks Sales Assistant City Attorney March outlined to Council regulations with regard to the sale and distribution of fireworks. Stated the City cannot select an exclusive franchise for the sale of fireworks. Stated the City can impose tighter limitations. Discussed State Firework Laws and the fact that it gives the city the grant of authority to regulate: - permits - applications - standards Councilman Rea discussed the State Fireworks Laws and that there is no citation that declares that the city can or cannot sell only particular fireworks. Assistant City Attorney March stated that State Fireworks Laws pre-empt other decisions, and that the law gives cities power to impose their own criteria. Councilman Byrd discussed one vendor bringing in fourteen applications this year, when they were restricted to only eight. Mayor Richards asked about the financial reports requested from vendors last year. City Clerk Hooper stated she has some of the responses from last years request in her office. City Clerk Hooper discussed last years decision to make the fireworks operators equitable and discussed the letters sent to vendors with the requirements for this years sale of fireworks as well as the number of stands each vendor would be allowed. Mayor Richards asked for a financial report from each non-profit organization operating a stand. Vendors will be required to provide to the city an audit report outlining their gross receipts and financial statements for FY 1999-2000. Mayor Richards stated that each non-profit should provide a supplemental form that would explain who is benefiting from the profits as well as how much each organization is profiting. This can be used as a tool in making decisions relating to the equality in profit earnings for organizations. Councilman Rea stated that the City does not have the right to regulate capital gains. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, and seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to bring this Item back to the next meeting for further discussion. ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 a.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL9.2001 C DATE: April 17, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, City Mana r BY: Gary D. Chicots, Community Development Director Mark Fullerton, Project Manager Bevan Thomas, Project Manager SUBJECT: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DDA) BETWEEN THE LYWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (THE "AGENCY") AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC. PURPOSE: To conduct a joint public hearing regarding a proposed Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) between the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") and Access Community Housing, anon-profit Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) for the purpose of developing three (3) single family dwellings on Agency owned property located at 4353, 4357 and 4361 Fernwood Avenue. FACTS: 1. In accordance with HUD guidelines, the City of Lynwood allocates a portion of its HOME Program allocation for Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO's) to be used for the development of affordable housing opportunities for low and moderate income families 2. On July 18, 2000 the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency approved the development concept proposal submitted by Access Community Housing and directed staff to prepare a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) The project consists of constructing three (3} new single family homes on Agency owned property located at 4353, 4357 and 4361 Fernwood Avenue. The Project will be partially funded with $292,600 Home Program funds. 4. A draft DDA has been prepared for consideration and approval. ANALYSIS: The project site is located in Redevelopment Project Area "A" and includes three (3) parcels located north of the I-105 Freeway at 4353, 4357 and 4361 Fernwood Avenue. The developer will be Access Community Housing, a qualified non-profit Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO). The Proposed development consists of constructing three (3) single family detached homes on 5,000 square foot lots. Each home is designed to include approximately 1,500 square feet of living area, three bedrooms, a living room, dining room, kitchen area and attached garage. Under the terms of the DDA, the Agency shall sell the property to the Developer for the appraised value and the Developer will target and restrict the sale of the units to individuals with incomes that do not exceed 80% of the county median. The project site was appraised at $90,000 or $30,000 for each lot. HOME Program funds totaling -__~_. AC~F1NVA IT»Q O $292,600 will be utilized to offset the development cost and increase affordable housing opportunities. The sales price will be below the area median cost to ensure affordability for low and moderate income families. For your review and consideration attached is a copy of the DDA, and a map of the project area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a joint public hearing, after receiving public oral and written communication to close the public hearing and adopt the following resolutions: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., ANON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. (SEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA) A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., ANON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., A NON PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. (SEE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA) A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., A NON PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. Attachments: 1. Resolutions 2. 33433 Summary Report 3. Disposition and Development Agreement CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., ANON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council (the "City") wishes to consider the approval of a Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the City and Access Community Housing (the "Buyer"} for the sale of the property located at 4357 through 4361 Fernwood Avenue; and WHEREAS, a Project Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the 1980 Amendment to Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("1980 EIR"); and WHEREAS, the development advances the goals of the 1980 Amendment to Lynwood Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("1980 Amendment") described in the 1980 EIR which goals are to (1 }arrest the decline and decay and the spread of blight throughout the project area, (2) restore and revitalize existing residential, commercial and industrial areas to viable centers serving community and regional needs, and (3) stimulate and attract private investment thereby improving the City's economic health, employment opportunities and tax base; and WHEREAS, the 1980 EIR addresses the environmental impacts of the development pursuant to the proposed agreement; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared an Initial Study and found and determined that a subsequent EIR is not needed because none of the following condition of Section 15162 of Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA Guidelines"} has occurred: Subsequent changes are proposed in the project which will require important revisions to the 1980 EIR due to the involvement of new significant impacts not considered in the 1980 EIR; and Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under the project was undertaken due to the involvement of the new significant impacts not covered in the 1980 EIR; and New information of substantial importance to the project has become available. NOW, THEREFORE, the Lynwood City Council hereby resolves as follows: Section 1. The redevelopment of the Site provided for by the DDA is covered by the 1980 EIR which serves as the Final Environmental Impact Report for the entire Amendment, which Amendment constitutes the "Project". ection 2. The redevelopment of the Site provided for by the DDA was considered in the 1980 EIR as part of the Project. ection 3. The 1980 EIR was considered prior to the approval of the Agreement. The City hereby finds: the redevelopment pursuant to the proposed Agreement is within the scope of the 1980 Amendment previously approved; the effects of the redevelopment pursuant to the propose Final Environmental Impact Report together with all other development. All feasible mitigation measures and alternative developed in the previous Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project are incorporated in this Development. No new information of substantial importance to the Project has become available. The final Environmental Impact report, therefore, is determined to be adequate to serve as the environmental impact report for the Development and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. Section 4. Applicable mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into this Development which mitigate any potential significant environmental impacts thereof. Section 5. The Final Impact Report incorporates certain mitigation measures which are to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment, and the City hereby adopts the following program for reporting and monitoring the implementation of such mitigation measures pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6: A. The developer selected by the City shall enter into an Agreement with the City to submit all plans and specifications for the Development to the City for its approval, at which time the City shall review the plans .and specifications for compliance with such mitigation measures as are the responsibility of the Developer; B. The City shall comply with all requirements of the City of Lynwood (the "City")) and all public agencies having jurisdiction in any demolition and construction of public works are to be constructed by the Agency; C. The Agency will report to the City Council of the City not less than annually on the implementation of the mitigation measures and make any recommendations it deems necessary to further implement said measures, such report to be included in the Agency's annual report pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33089.5 and 33080.4; D. The City hereby authorizes and directs that a Notice of Determination with respect to the acquisition and development of the Site pursuant to the proposed DDA, and all other City actions taken in furtherance thereof, be filed. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of April, 2001. ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Shan Thiever, City Attorney Pauf H. Richards II, Mayor Ralph W. Davis, City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Gary D. Chicots, Director Community Development LRA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") wishes to consider the approval of a Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the Agency and Access Community Housing (the "Buyer") for the sale of the property located at 4357 through 4361 Fernwood Avenue; and WHEREAS, a Project Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the 1980 Amendment to Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("1980 EIR"); and WHEREAS, the development advances the goals of the 1980 Amendment to Lynwood Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("1980 Amendment") described in the 1980 EIR which goals are to (1) arrest the decline and decay and the spread of blight throughout the project area, (2) restore and revitalize existing residential, commercial and industrial areas to viable centers serving community and regional needs, and (3) stimulate and attract private investment thereby improving the City's economic health, employment opportunities and tax base; and WHEREAS, the 1980 EIR addresses the environmental impacts of the development pursuant to the proposed agreement; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared an Initial Study and found and determined that a subsequent EIR is not needed because none of the following condition of Section 15162 of Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA Guidelines") has occurred: Subsequent changes are proposed in the project which will require important revisions to the 1980 EIR due to the involvement of new significant impacts not considered in the 1980 EIR; and Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under the project was undertaken due to the involvement of the new significant impacts not covered in the 1980 EIR; and New information of substantial importance to the project has become available. NOW, THEREFORE, the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency hereby resolves as follows: ection 1. The redevelopment of the Site provided for by the DDA is covered by the 1980 EIR which serves as the Final Environmental Impact Report for the entire Amendment, which Amendment constitutes the "Project". Section 2. The redevelopment of the Site provided for by the DDA was considered in the 1980 EIR as part of the Project. Section 3. The 1980 EIR was considered prior to the approval of the Agreement. The Agency hereby finds: the redevelopment pursuant to the proposed Agreement is within the scope of the 1980 Amendment previously approved; the effects of the redevelopment pursuant to the propose Final Environmental Impact Report together with all other development. All feasible mitigation measures and alternative developed in the previous Final Project are incorporated in this Development. No new information of substantial importance to the Project has become available. The final Environmental Impact report, therefore, is determined to be adequate to serve as the environmental impact report for the Development and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. e ti n 4. Applicable mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into this Development which mitigate any potential significant environmental impacts thereof. S ction .The Final Impact Report incorporates certain mitigation measures which are to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment, and the City hereby adopts the following program for reporting and monitoring the implementation of such mitigation measures pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6: A. The developer selected by the Agency shall enter into an Agreement with the Agency to submit all plans and specifications for the Development to the Agency for its approval, at which time the City shall review the plans and specifications for compliance with such mitigation measures as are the responsibility of the Developer; B. The Agency shall comply with all requirements of the City of Lynwood (the "City")) and all public agencies having jurisdiction in any demolition and construction of public works are to be constructed by the Agency; C. The Agency will report to the City Council of the City not less than annually on the implementation of the mitigation measures and make any recommendations it deems necessary to further implement said measures, such report to be included in the Agency's annual report pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33089.5 and 33080.4; D. The Agency hereby authorizes and directs that a Notice of Determination with respect to the acquisition and development of the Site pursuant to the proposed DDA, and all other Agency actions taken in furtherance thereof, be filed. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of April, 2001. ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Agency Attorney Paul H. Richards II, Chairman Ralph W. Davis, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Gary D. Chicots, Director Community Development RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION. WHEREAS, The City of Lynwood receives an annual allocation of HOME Program funds from the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development to carry out certain eligible activities with Community Development Housing Organizations in accordance with federal regulation 24 CFR 92; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood opportunities and projects for Redevelopment Plan and in orc proposes to enter into a Dis Community Housing, Inc. which and Redevelopment Agency engages in affordable housing low and moderate income persons as part of the er to implement a redevelopment project the Agency position and Development Agreement with Access provides for the development of single family homes, WHEREAS, the Agency desires to consider the disposition of the Agency property in connection with the development of the Site by the Developer, and WHEREAS, the proposed DDA contains all the provisions, terms, conditions, and obligations required by state and local law, and WHEREAS, the Developer possesses the qualifications necessary to ensure development of the Site proposed in accordance with the purposes and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, WHEREAS, the Agency has conducted a public hearing and considered the proposed DDA based on the best interest of the City of Lynwood and in accordance with the goals and objectives of the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency as follows: Section 1. That the Agency approves the Disposition and Development Agreement with Access Community Housing, Inc. and commits $ 292,000 of the HOME Investment Partnership CHDO Set-Aside allocation to be used for the development of affordable units. Section 2 . This Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of April 2001. Paul H. Richards, II, Chairman ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM Agency Attorney Ralph Davis, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO CONTENT Gary Chicots, Community Development Director RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., ANON-PROFIT CORPORATION. WHEREAS, The City of Lynwood receives an annual allocation of HOME Program funds from the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development to carry out certain eligible activities with Community Development Housing Organizations in accordance with federal regulation 24 CFR 92; and WHEREAS, The City of Lynwood engages in affordable housing opportunities and projects for low and moderate income persons as part of the Redevelopment Plan and in order to implement a redevelopment project the Agency proposes to enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement with Access Community Housing, Inc. which provides for the development of single family homes, and WHEREAS, The City desires to consider the disposition of the Agency property in connection with the development of the Site by the Developer, and WHEREAS, the proposed DDA contains all the provisions, terms, conditions, and obligations required by state and local law, and WHEREAS, the Developer possesses the qualifications necessary to ensure development of the Site proposed in accordance with the purposes and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, WHEREAS, The City Council has conducted a public hearing and considered the proposed DDA based on the best interest of the City of Lynwood and in accordance with the goals and objectives of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the Lynwood City Council as follows: ec ion 1. That the City Council approves the Disposition and Development Agreement with Access Community Housing, Inc. and commits $ 292,000 of the HOME Investment Partnership CHDO Set-Aside allocation to be used for the development of affordable units. e tion 2 . This Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of April 2001. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor ATTEST Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Ralph Davis, City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT Gary Chicots, Community Development Director 33433 SUMMARY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 33433 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE FOR THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., ANON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. The Lynwood Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") proposes to sell for redevelopment purposes certain real property in the Lynwood Redevelopment Project Area A (the "Site"), pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law. The Site is owned by the Agency and is located at 4357 through 4361 Fernwood Avenue and is proposed to be sold to Access Community Housing (the Buyer)") pursuant to a disposition and development Agreement. PUBLIC COSTS The proposed Agreement calls for the Agency to sell the Site, subject to certain terms contained in the proposed Agreement. The Agency's cost to implement the proposed Agreement is limited to staff time involved with the implementation of the project. The estimated cost of the Site to the Agency is: Real Property Value $90,000 Developer Purchase amount $90,000 Total cost or subsidy $0 The Agency proposes to contribute $0 dollars toward the project. The developer has secured construction funds from the Century Housing Corporation and development funds from the City of Lynwood HOME Program. The use of these two funding sources will require the developer to sell these units at an affordable sales price to a moderate or low -income family. II. ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE INTEREST TO BE CONVEYED A qualified appraiser has prepared an analysis of the estimated value of the real property interest to be conveyed pursuant to Section 33433 of the California Health & Safety Code. The estimated value of the real property interest can be calculated in two ways. One such way is to estimate the value of the interest based upon the highest and best use of the subject real property where the only permitted restrictions are those imposed by zoning. When determined at the highest and best use permitted under the Lynwood Redevelopment Project Area A Plan, the appraiser has determined that the value of the interest to be conveyed is Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000) per lot. A second such way to estimate the value of the interest to be conveyed is to value the interest based upon controls in addition to zoning which are placed upon the subject real property by the Agency in the proposed Agreement and limit the type of uses to which the real property can be devoted. When determined at the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the sale as proposed in the Agreement, the appraiser has determined the value to be is Thirty thousand Dollars ($30,000) per lot. III. VALUE OF THE INTEREST PROPOSED TO BE CONVEYED The proposed Agreement calls for the developer to pay the Agency $90,000 for the purchase of the three lots. IV. ELIMINATION OF BLIGHT The development of the site is a continuation of the Agency's efforts to eliminate blight in the area. The previous uses on the Site consisted of a single family residence prior to the construction of the I-105 freeway, however the Site has been maintained as a vacant lot for several years depriving the City and Agency of any sales tax and tax increment. The Site is currently zoned R1 Single family Residential Zone that complies with the General Plan designation of Single Famiiy. The proposed use (residential) is a permitted use under both the zoning and the General Plan. Moreover, the proposed project will be designed to maximize its efficiency with respect to parking, landscaping, and overall aesthetics. The proposed housing will be designed to architecturally enhance the housing stock in the surrounding area. DATE: April 17, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager ~~~ Gary Chicots, Director of Community Development Department BY: Grant Taylor, Senior Planner SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03 8~ Zone Change No 2000 02 PROPOSAL To conduct a public hearing in order to consider General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03, to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Commercial to Single-Family Residential; and Zone Change No. 2000-02 to change the zoning from P-1 (Parking) to R-1 (Single-Family Residential). PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: The City is requesting approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change in order to permit the future construction of three (3) residential units on a vacant parcel owned by the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency on the north side of Fernwood Avenue between First Avenue and the alley behind Atlantic Avenue. The nine (9) affected parcels total approximately 50,000 square feet (1.15 acres) in area. DISCUSSION The 1990 General Plan designated the subject properties as Commercial. The underlying zoning is P-1 (Parking). The General Plan and zoning designations are consistent. Eight (8) parcels in the subject area are currently developed with single-family residences and one (1) parcel, located at 11666 First Avenue is developed with four (4) units. The fourplex is currently anon-conforming property and would remain non-conforming if this proposal is approved. However, the other eight parcels would lose their non-conforming status and be in compliance with the new zoning and general plan designations. Even without the request from Herb Childs to develop the three (3) vacant parcels, this application makes good planning sense and would have been recommended. Surrounding properties along Brewster Avenue, Fernwood Avenue, First Avenue and Elm Street are predominantly developed with single-family residences. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would bring the subject properties into conformance with the single-family development in the area and on surrounding properties. It makes good land use planning sense, particularly with respect to the Housing Element, and City housing needs, to designate the subject area as Single-Family Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a public hearing and after considering public oral and written comments to close the public hearing and adopt the attached resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03 and adopt the attached ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-02. Attachments: 1. Project Profile 2. Location/Zoning Maps (2) 3. Resolution and Ordinance 4. Environmental Documentation h:\wordfile\planning\ s[affrp[\GPA2000-O1.DOC .~.~ II~ PROPERTY PROFILE 1. Source of Authority: Section 65358(a) of the State Planning and Zoning Law; Lynwood Municipal Code (LMC) Section 25-31 sets forth the process and requirements for an Amendment to the General Plan; LMC Section 25-27 pertains to changing the zoning designation. 2. Property Location: The nine (9) parcels are located within the areas bounded by Brewster Avenue to the north; Fernwood Avenue to the south; First Avenue to the west; and the alley behind Atlantic Avenue to the east. The parcels are further described as Tract 8716, Lots 188 through 196; Assessor's Map Book 6189, Page 13, Parcels 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 038 and 902; addresses 4348, 4356 and 4360 Brewster Avenue; 1166, 11670 and 11676 First Avenue; and three (3) vacant City owned parcels on the north side of Fernwood Avenue between First Avenue and the alley west of Atlantic Avenue. 3. Property Size: The subject properties total approximately 50,000 square feet (1.15 acres) in area. 4. Existing Land Use: The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Single-Family Residential and a Church South - I-105 Freeway East - Single-Family Residential West - Commercial 5. Land Use Desi nation: The current General Plan Designation for the subject property is Commercial while the Zoning Classification is P-1 (Parking). The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan Zoning North -Single-Family Residential R-1 South -Transportation I-105 Freeway East -Single-Family Residential R-1 and R-3 West -Commercial C-3 7. Site Plan Review: The Site Plan Review Committee has not reviewed the proposal. However, in order to develop the proposed residential projects on the vacant City owned parcels, three (3) Site Plan Review applications will be required. 8. Zoning Enforcement History None of record at the time this report was prepared. 9. Public Response: None of record at the time this report was prepared. h: \wordfile\planning\ staffrpt\GPA2000-O1.DOC EXISTING Zoning and General Plan Designations i ° CORTLAND ,.. ST o ~ GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION ' GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION F= iS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ~ 23. S4 .?S•o2 ,. ~9~ iS SO „ 23.SB SO 20 B-F.9g NSF1~ SFD Sf~ S~~ SFP SAD SFD F.U SAD R~-+~.:1 O ~~ 40,, ~Oo 0 0 0 O O ~ 158 ' 159 160 161 62 163 164 165 166 ~' Lr~"4~~ << ~~ W so ~ o so ao ~" ~ 3 W N 1 N ~ o E.., N ., .. ,. ~ (az ~ ~ z V] " SO .qtp I H I I o W o /O // /Z /3 /4 /S /6 /7 /6 ~ 1i ~ °' / ~ 167 0 168 169 f 70 17I 7 I ~ V Q 2 73 I74 v o ~ ~~ o .gssa-' ~ '~~J~„ / SAD SFD SFU Sr D SAD S;`D s~D spy ~~,~~.I, I- I 3a.9e sO q = /S SO 20 B S. 02 23.SB N7/'OS'00'w q . /S 23. S4 `° BREWSTER ~ ~ ~ AVE.`° N~^ J~.V L ov 50 34.98 ~ ~%, ~~ 0 ~ ~a~35 50 r 50 LO O B4.9BII/aSl 2g ~' z/ po O /9 • O ~ s m S SO vi ~l 2Y 4 ~ ~ 01 O w O /5 /Q 100 M m 201 200 199 198 ° 19~ ~ Q ~ !9 195 194 S>` D St.D SF1~ Sf-.1~ SOU S S SF . ~ial l;e~u; ~ o 50 - .. _ 50 ~ ~ ALLEY o c ° 50 ~ ~p II ~ " 125 I25 ~ r' 1 ° O I I f~5'7 o It~~S I!4( 140 /'~ I82 zz 202 z4 104 S~v ° ~ ~- s Re{~•~ _ a' SFD -U ; ~ ~3 I9 p fcs _ _ i 50 114 7 1 W ,°~ SfV za 203 ~s'S1-D IIfo7~ 1167 Ig U ~o~ N FD /z ° - z 125 125 ~ 6 7~j Q ~ ALLEY ° iso a N II~7lF 184 ~" 50 SQ•' seioe° 6.190-' e,sOOOr•• ~' S ~" ,D 8 191 a° PG~hi~y La( ~B'1' Q i.o20:' Z g¢ O cl m 2~9 33 37 40 ~s~"a O (Ib e~ 36 0 ° vne 0_210 ~ ~ ~. ~ 207 206 L ~ p I8 Rel~~ /~ rn _ 4U / '~ SrY M SI-/~ M ,~~"~ S ~ _ _ ~ /I090s• Yjs (1(0$ P 3 7 M t` Fff 9o O m °i Z 37.65 50.57 S T S><.A ~ m I ,n o 1 6 50.57 - o ~^ ioo !6 0 0 ~ ~ 33.13 250\y ~cy~ - G..'I"o ® ° s. P OOD 50' S 50. .o vmi 9 187 V4C4„"r~ ea.~ofl~g7 0 / tae`' TRACT NO. 87 ~ 6 , AVM Case No. General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03 and Zone Change No. 2000-02 5it~/~ddr~ss:north of Fernwood; south of Brewster; east of First; west of Atlantic alley Applicant Name: City of Lynwood [ ] 300' or [ ] 500' Radius Map PROPOSED Zoning & General Plan Designations I ~ o CORTLAND 5.~. o ~ GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION GENERAL PLAN nESIGNATION , ,p: ,S SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENT1gL ~ SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ~ 23. S4 ~~ /S .3SOZ SO •• .. 23.58 SO ZO B~f.96 NSFD SFD S~~ SFI~ S~FP SFD SFD ,~ SAD R~~~; I h O 0 O O O O O O O ~ O ~ L~nn 4rl ~~^I~a~ ~ 158 ' 159 160 16 I 62 163 164 165 166 W so 3 r,l o so ao ~>~~ W 0 (22 O o a N E,.y „ ., ., „ N 1 N ~ o SO i ti I ~ c W ~ .5'D .pp e o /O // /Z /3 /G /S /6 /J /6 'v- 2i.~ a. ~ 167 o 168 169 170 171 72 173 f 74 a o ~~ ~ ~~ o S~"D SFD SFU Sr=D SI=P SAD s~0 Sfy ¢~y~m I~~-f<<; 3C.9B So ,y ~ ,S SO 20 B S. OZ 23.58 N7/'OS'OO^w ,Q./~r- 23. 541 0 `° BREWSTER ~ ~ d AVE.~° ~r ~~.v~ ~v 5° 34.98 73 '~, s ~ 35 5 50 O 84.98 u~S Z/ °o O /9 O /T Sm I,,,J S SO°~ N 180 I12Y4~ { Omf _ m /6 /5 /4 1001 ~ tD 201 200 199 198 ° l9l ~ Q ~ 19 195 194 Sall StJ~ SF.D Sri SOU S S Sf ~lal Re~~,; ~ o s0 .. o 50 o so ° ~a` II. ^' ALLEY o I((pS7 125 I'L5 llrlp$' ~ I c O IivG Id0 / o _ ,., ss IeZ Re~: f ~ N SFDZ2 2oz ~4 zoa SFD ° - U~; ' ~ /,9 1s o Ics W is0 If47( U W s~p II~O71 IIG7 1g ~-• SOU 13 t03 zs t05 o F"' N FD /z o - z I25 ,z5 .50 ~ e ~~ .Q-a ~ ALLEY o so N f IrF 7(~ 184 F" O O i pGn In LP Q Sa~x•~ 50 '^ SFD ~ 191 Q ~`~ rI ~~I 5.020:' 209 i0 d3 j/ 40 \s~^~ O f I~ i~ 36 o m 207 206 ° ° vex. m-210 a a ~'~~ ~ f- ~ - RerB~~_f;,l ~ Rek,l T Sr.D o S1~Y `~ r v' /7090x• t(js. II(o 5f p 3Z 37 S M Sri ,.. S~JT _ _ ~ ~ 9o O 50.56 p 50.57 to 33. r3 250oy ~ccl^~ ~ ., /. R~ :~ Vac4n~ s. P ERNw~O~ ~ . ' ' S° s~ TRACT NO. r~ 87i 6 AVE. Casc No. General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03 and Zone Change No. 2000-02 5ilc /lcldre;s5: north of Fernwood; south of Brewster; east of First; west of Atlantic alley Applicant Name: City of Lynwood [ ) 300' or [ ) 500' Radius Map RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2000- 03 WITH RESPECT TO TRACT 8716, LOTS 188 THROUGH 196; ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 6189 PAGE 13 PARCELS 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 038 AND 902; LOCATED AT 4348, 4356 AND 4360 BREWSTER AVENUE; 11666, 11670 AND 11676 FIRST AVENUE AND THREE (3) VACANT CITY OWNED PARCELS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERNWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND THE ALLEY WEST OF ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA FROM COMMERCIAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council did pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on April 17, 2001 on a proposed General Plan Amendment with respect to the above identified subject properties; and WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environment, and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for the proposal, which is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Councils determines that Single Family Residential zoning of the subject properties would be consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, at a duly notice public hearing approved General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03 pursuant to Resolution 2794 on October 10, 2000. Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed General Plan Amendment will be consistent with the objectives and the development policies of the City of Lynwood. B. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not unreasonable constrain the use of property by landowners and developers. C. The Proposed General Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the General Plan. D. The Single Family Residential land use designation of the properties would be compatible with surrounding land uses. E. A General Plan Amendment from Commercial to Single Family Residential would be consistent with the Goals and policies of the General Plan. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determination, hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03. H: \ WORDFILE\P LA Nt~ I1` GIRESOSUeso.tounci l.gpa2000-03.doc PASSED, APPROVED AND ADDOPTED this day of 2001. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney H:\W ORDFILE\PLATT I2~GIRESOS Vew.counci I.gpa2000-03.doc PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Department 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-02 WITH RESPECT TO TRACT 8716, LOTS 188 THROUGH 196; ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 6189 PAGE 13 PARCELS 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 038 AND 902; LOCATED AT 4348, 4356 AND 4360 BREWSTER AVENUE; 11666, 11670 AND 11676 FIRST AVENUE AND THREE (3) VACANT CITY OWNED PARCELS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERNWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND THE ALLEY WEST OF ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA FROM P-1 (PARKING) TO R-1 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL). WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council did pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on April 17, 2001 on a proposed Zone Change with respect to the above identified subject properties and application; and WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environment, and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for the proposal, which is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council determined that Single Family Residential zoning of these properties would be consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council determined that R-1 zoning is consistent with the character of the neighborhood in the vicinity; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council has determined the zone change will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare citizens working or residing in the vicinity. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, at a duly noticed public hearing approved Zone Change No. 2000-02 pursuant to Resolution 2795 on October 10, 2000. Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed Zone Change will be consistent with the objectives and the development policies of the City of Lynwood. B. The proposed Zone Change will not unreasonable constrain the use of property by landowners and developers. C. The proposed Zone Change will not adversely affect the General Plan. D. The Single Family Residential zoning designation of the properties would be compatible with surrounding land uses. E. A Zone Change from P-1 (Parking) to R-1 (Single-Family Residential) is consistent with goals and policies of the General Plan. H:1W ORDFILE~PLA~T.INGU2ESOSbrd.counci Lu2000-02.doc .~-., F. An R-1 zoning designation would make eight {8) nonconforming properties conforming. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determination, hereby approves Zone Change No. 2000- 02. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADDOPTED this day of , 2001. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney H:1 WORDFILE\PLAT`1~I1~G~RESOSbed.council.u2000-02.doc PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Department 2 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, Ca. 95814 From: City of Lynwood City of Lynwood 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, Ca. 90262 County Clerk County of Los Angeles 500 West Temple Los Angeles, Ca. 90012 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 2151 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03 & Zone Change No. 2000-02 State Clearinghouse Number: N/A Lead Agency: City of Lynwood, (310) 603-0220 Project Location-Specific: The subject properties are nine (9) parcels. One parcel is a residential fourplex, three parcels are vacant and five parcels are developed with single family residences. The area is bounded by Brewster Avenue to the north; Fernwood Avenue to the south; First Avenue to the west; and the alley behind Atlantic Avenue to the east. The property totals 50,000 square feet or 1.15 acres in area. The property is further described as Tract 8716, Lots 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195 and 196; Assessor's Map Book 6189, Page 13, Parcels 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 038 and 902. Project Description: The proposed project consists of entitlements to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Commercial to Single-Family Residential; and to change the zoning designation from P-1 (Parking) to R-1 (Single-Family Residential); and to construct three (3) single family dwelling units on the north side of Fernwood Avenue. APN 6189-013-902. This is to advise that the City of Lynwood as Lead Agency has approved the above-described Negative Declaration on October 10, 2001 and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project. 1. The project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of approval of the Project. 4. A Statement of Overriding Conditions was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at Lynwood City Hall Annex, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262. Signature Date: Title: Community Development Director, City of Lynwood Date received for filing at County of Los Angeles: Date received for filing at OPR: H: \ W ORD FIL E\PLANNMG\notdet.herbc h i Ids. doc CITY OF LYNWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CA 90262 (310) 603-0220, Extension 326 NEGATIVE DECLARATION County Clerk Corporation Division, Room 106 Post Office Box 151 Los Angeles, Ca. 90053 RE: Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment No 2000 03 and Zone Change No. 2000-02 To Whom It May Concern: Application has been filed with the City of Lynwood for approval of the project know as General Plan Amendment No 2000-03 and Zone hange No 2000 02 to be located in the area bounded by Brewster Avenue to the north• Fernwood Avenue to the outh• First Avenue to the west: and the alley behind Atlantic Avenue to the east The roperties are further described as Tract 8716 Lots 188 through 196• Assessor's Map Book 6189 Page 13. Parcels 012. 013 014 015 016 038 and 902; located at 4348, 4356 and 4360 B~ew~ter Avenue• 11666 11670 and l 1676 First Avenue• and three (3) vacant city owned parcels on the north side of Fernwood Avenue Between Fir t Avenue and the alley west of Atlantic Avenue and to be implemented by_the City of Lynwood Community Development Department. The project is briefly described as: General Plan Amendment No 2000-03• Amending the Land Use Map from Commercial to Single-Family Re idential Zone Chance No 2000-02• Changing the P 1 (Parking) zone to R 1 (Single F_ amity Residential. In accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State Guidelines, and the City of Lynwood Guidelines for the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Department of Community Development of the City of Lynwood analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, the Department prepared and hereby filed this NEGATIVE DECLARATION. A period of twenty-one (21} days from the date of filing of this NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be provided to enable public review of the project specifications and this document prior to action on the project by the City of Lynwood. A copy of the project specification is on file in the offices of the Department of• Community Development, City Hall 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. This Document is being filed in duplicate. Please acknowledge filing date and return the copy in the enclosed stamped, self- addressed envelope. Prepared and filed by: The Department of Community Development BY: Grant Taylor, Sen- tanner h'\aordfi I elplannning\fonnsbegdec. doc Revised 07-27-98 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Findings Project Title: General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03 & Zone Change No. 2000-02 Project Site: Properties bounded by Fernwood Avenue to the south; Brewster Avenue to the north; the alley behind Atlantic Avenue to the east; and First Avenue to the west. Tract No. 8716, Lots 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194 195 and 196; Assessor's Parcel # 6189-011-012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 038 & 902. Applicant: City of Lynwood Project Description: The initial study is based on changing the General Plan Land Use Designation from Commercial to Single-Family Residential and change the zoning from P-1 (Parking) to R- 1 (Single-Family Residential). There are nine (9) parcels. One parcel is developed with a four unit apartment complex; three parcels are vacant, and five parcels are developed with single family residences. The subject properties are located on nine (9) parcels totaling approximately 50,000 square feet (1.15 acres) in area. The three vacant parcels will be developed with three (3) single family residences. Findings of Exemption: This project will not have an individual or cumulative adverse effect on fish and/ or wildlife resources in that the Initial Study prepared in conjunction with the environmental review of the project nor the record of the proceedings for its approval identified any potential impacts to fish and game or such resources. Certification: I hereby certify that the lead.. agency has made the above findings of fact and that (based upon the initial study and hearing record) the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Grant Taylor Senior Planner Title City of Lynwood Lead Agency Date H:\ W ORDFILE\PLANNING\fish&game.herbchi Ids.doc CITY OF LYNWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proponent : CITY OF LYNWOOD 2. Address and phone number of proponent: 11330 BULLIS ROAD, LYNWOOD, CA 90262; (310) 603-0220 extension 32fi 3. Date of checklist submitted: SEPTEMBER 21.2000 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: CITY OF LYNWOOD 5. Name of proposal, if applicable: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2000-03 AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-02 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal results in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b) Disruption, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e.) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X g) Exposure of people of property to geologic hazards such as earthquake, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazard? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: H:SR'ORDfIL~'~PLANNINGIFORMSIGPA2000-03 & ZC2000-0?.environmrnuLDOC 1 a) Substantial air emission or deterioration of ambient air quality? b) The creation of obecjtionable odors? c) Alterations of air movements, moisture, temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Wili the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movement, in either marine or fresh waters? b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alterations of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f) Alterations of the direction or rates of flow of ground waters? g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? I) Exposure of people or property to water relocated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of specifies, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? H:~WORDFILE~PLAVVI~IG~FORMSIGPA2000-03 & ZC2000-0?.environmenuLDOC 2 YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects. )? b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c) Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a) increase in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area.? 9. Natural resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural sources? b) Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a.) A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances( including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan. YES MAYBE H:~N'ORDFILEIPL.4NNING~FOFN45\GPA2000-03 &X2000-0?.em•~ronmrnul.DOC 3 YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Transportation/ Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b} Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation of movements of people and/ or goods? e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f) increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicle, bicyclist or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a} Fire Protection? b) Police Protection? c) Schools? d) Park or other recreational facilities? e} Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f} Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: H6~~'ORDFIL&PLAN'NING~FORMS~GPA2000-03 3 ZC2000-02.rnvironmenuLDOC 4 X X X X X X X X X X X X a} Power or natural gas? b) Communication systems? c) Water? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e} Storm water drainage? f) Sotid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a) Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b) Will the proposal result in the adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? YES MAYBE H:1W'ORDFILE\PLANNING~FORMS~GPA2000-03 & ZC2000.0?.environmenul.DOC 5 YES MAYBE NO 21. Mandatory Findings or Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endue well into the future.) X c} Does the project have impact which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resources is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environmental is significant.) X d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 12. The subject properties are developed with single family residences except 11666 First Avenue that consists of four (4) units. This property will remain non-conforming but may continue to operate as a fourplex. If the property were to be destroyed or become vacant for more six (6) months. Only a single family dwelling would be permitted. 13b. The three vacant lots (188,189 and 190) are zoned P-1 (parking). These properties could be utilized for parking needs of future commercial businesses however, it is anticipated that the lots will never be util°~ed for parking. In addition the City currently has a housing shortage and developing the vacant parcels with three (3) single-fami{y dwellings would be a better ~~se of land and help the City provide its fair share of housing pursuant to the RHNA numbers. H:\K'ORDFILE8LA.4'N1NG\FORMS\GPA2000-03 & ZC2000-0?.rnvironmenuLDOC 6 IV. DETERMINATION ( To be completed by the Lead Agency) ON THE BASIS OF THIS INITIAL EVALUATION: [ x ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ ] I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: September 21, 2000 Signature Grant Taylor Print Full Name Community Development Department Department H ~WORDfILE~PL.4VNINGiFORM51GPA2000-03 & ZC2000-0?.environmenuLDOC 7 DATE: April 17, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager Gary Chicots, Community Development Director BY: Grant Taylor, Senior Planner SUB7ECT: Appeal No. 2001-02: Request to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31, EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Lynwood: PURPOSE To conduct a public hearing in order to consider Appeal No. 2001-02, the decision of the Planning Commission to Approve Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; applications to change the zoning at Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial); and approve a 2,890 square foot expansion to the EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall at 3351 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. BACKGROUND On March 19, 2001, the Planning Division and City Clerk's Office received Appeal No. 2001- 02, arequest to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on March 13, 2001, January 9, 2001 and December 12, 2000 on the above-identified applications. On March 13, 2001, the Planning Commission approved two (2) applications submitted by Hermelio Franco, the business owner of the EI Farallon Restaurant and Dance Hall. The Planning Commission approved Zone change No 2000-03, to change the zoning for the property known as Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial). In addition, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 that provided approval of the following: a) Expand the existing restaurant and dance hall by 2,890 square feet; and b) Remove the nonconforming status of the dance hall land use; and c) Remove the nonconforming status of the alcoholic beverage license. The conditional use permit only needs Planning Commission approval, however, a zone change is an ordinance and requires approval from the City Council. If the City Council does not adopt the zone change ordinance the conditional use permit is null and void. The subject property is located at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard within a CB-1 zone and the business establishment currently totals approximately 14,779 square feet. The addition would bring the total floor area to 17,816 square feet. The business has the following active licenses: City of Lynwood Business License • Dance Hall & Dance Club Permit • Live Entertainment Permit • Vending & Coin Operated Machines Permit • Alcoholic Beverage Control License H:IWORDF[LEIPLANNING\STAFFRPT\cup.zc.elfarollon.cc.doc ~A PPSit ~~ _-~__ ~- ~.._,,,r-T~ There is no record of a conditional use permit for the business. Conditional use permits are required for dance halls and sale of alcoholic beverages. City Council approval is required for live entertainment permits and no resolution or minute order is on file. The Planning Commission approved a security plan that must be entered into between the business owner and the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department. The security plan would not only address the parking area of the business, but would require security of a two (2) block area around the perimeter of Lynwood Plaza. Such security plan would restrict ingress and egress on residential streets and would force patrons to exit the property on Martin Luther King ]r. Boulevard. The business owner has agreed to contract with the Sheriff Department for the life of the conditional use permit to provide uniformed Deputies in Lynwood Plaza and surrounding neighborhoods. Security inside the establishment would is provided by a private firm. DISCUSSION Lynwood Municipal Code (LMC) Section 25-7(b) identifies permitted uses within the CB-1 zone. Dance halls or nightclubs are not a permitted use, therefore, the business is nonconforming. LMC Section 25-7.2(c) identifies prohibited uses and states that any business, use or institution that is specifically authorized in other zones is prohibited in the CB-1 zone. LMC Section 25-10.1(f)(1) identifies dance halls as permitted subject to a conditional use permit within the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone, therefore, dance halls are prohibited in the CB-1, C-2 and C-2A zones. The Lynwood General Plan Land Use Map designates the property as commercial. The zone change from CB-1 to C-3 is consistent with the General Plan. There are several issues involving the zone change request. Lynwood Plaza consists of eight (8) separate property owners. EI Farallon is part of a large multiple tenant building. It would not make good planning sense to only designate EI Farallon as C-3. The entire Lynwood Plaza be addressed as a whole. The proposal is all or nothing for Lynwood Plaza and would make at least two (2) nonconforming businesses comply. A C-3 zoning designation would allow additional land uses that could be more intensive such as auto repair, equipment rental yard, equipment storage yard, feed and fuel yard, and dog kennels. The parking within Lynwood Plaza is sufficient to accommodate the expansion, the building could support the occupancy load, and the business has fire sprinklers. Based on public testimony, the primary issue is activities in the parking lot and surrounding neighborhood. The comprehensive security plan and other applicable conditions of approval were developed to address those issues. The business is classified as nonconforming and subject to provisions set forth in LMC Section 25-15. Non-conforming buildings and uses are not permitted to expand or intensify the land use. In addition, there is an amortization period of ten (10) years in commercial zones in which nonconforming uses shall be abated pursuant to LMC Section 25-15.6(b). It does not appear that the City has enforced any abatement schedule and there is a question if the LMC nonconforming and abatement code sections are legally enforceable. One option to approve the proposed expansion without a zone change would be for staff to perform a Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)to permit dance halls, nightclubs, etc. within CB-i zones subject to a conditional use permit. A ZOA could remove the need for a zone change. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNIIVG\STAFFRPT1cup.zc.elfarallon.cc.doc 2 LMC Section 25-27 permits property owners or their authorized agents to initiate a change of zoning or general plan designation, however, the public cannot initiate a ZOA. OPTIONS The City Council has four (4) options to consider regarding this appeal. 1. Overturn the Planning Commission decision and APPROVE Appeal No. 2001-02. 2. Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and DENY Appeal No. 2001-02. 3. Direct staff to perform a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow dance halls, nightclubs, etc. in the CB-1 zone subject to a conditional use permit. 4. Continue the application and provide direction to staff. Denial of the applications would leave anon-conforming business with no conditional use permit and no conditions to regulate. The result of a nonconforming business would be continued problems with cruising, loitering and other police issues. In addition, other uses within Lynwood Plaza would remain nonconforming. Support of the conditional use permit and zone change would include mandatory and specific conditions of approval in order to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of citizens working and residing in the area. Conditions would include implementing and maintaining a security plan reviewed and approved by the Sheriff Department; implementing an exterior lighting plan, parking plan, submitting a new fire sprinkler plan, and submitting for building plan check. If conditions of approval are implemented and adhered to, the required findings in LMC Section 25-25.7 could be made to approve the conditional use permit. In addition, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and appropriate mitigation measures have been required in order to reduce negative impacts to a level of insignificance. The zone would provide EI Farallon with an opportunity to be conforming and mitigate impacts on properties in the vicinity. If the City Council directs staff to draft a zoning ordinance amendment, the appeal would be tabled until the Planning Commission and City Council conduct public hearings for the zoning ordinance amendment. Staff does not recommend this option. Continuing this item may not further the public interest, as this is the fourth public hearing. Staff does not recommend this option. SUMMARY & CONCLUSION If the City Council elects to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission, the Council would introduce the ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 first, otherwise the conditional use permit (CUP) would be null and void. The second motion would be to adopt the resolution denying Appeal No. 2001-02 and upholding the decision of the Planning Commission. If the project is approved, the EI Farallon restaurant would be scheduled for hearing before the Planning Commission within six (6) months to review the status of compliance with mandatory conditions of approval. If the City Council elects to support the appeal and thereby overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, the Council would adopt the resolution to approve Appeal 2001-02. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\cup.zc.eltarallon.cc.doc 3 The City Council needs to carefully review and enforce the need to protect surrounding residential properties from deleterious affects of unregulated businesses. The City Council also needs to be mindful that businesses with historical enforcement problems need to be given adequate opportunity to comply before aggressive enforcement is contemplated. A zone change and conditional use permit with strict conditions is a good first step in ensuring that the business as well as residents issues are taken into consideration and resolved in a timely manner. If the applicants fail to abide by the conditions set forth in the resolution, the City can consider other options including revocation of the conditional use permit and business licenses. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a public hearing and after considering public oral and written comments to close the public hearing and choose one of following options: 1) Adopt the resolution to APPROVE Appeal No. 2001-02 and overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, thereby denying the project. 2) Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and introduce the ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 and adopt the resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. 3) Direct staff to draft a Zoning Ordinance Amendment and thereby table the appeal, zone change and conditional use permit. 4) Continue the public hearing and direct staff. Attachments: Project Profile Location Map Appeal No. 2001-02 application List of citizens providing public testimony Sheriff Report Resolution Approving Appeal No. 2001-02 Ordinance Approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 Environmental Documentation Security Plan Lighting Plan Traffic/Parking Plan Floor Plan H:\WORDFILE\PLAA(IV[NG\STAFFRP'ilcup.zc.clfarellon.cc.doc 4 One option to approve the proposed expansion without a zone change would be for staff to perform a Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)to permit dance halls, nightclubs, etc. within CB-1 zones subject to a conditional use permit. A ZOA could remove the need for a zone change. LMC Section 25-27 permits property owners or their authorized agents to initiate a change of zoning or general plan designation, however, the public cannot initiate a ZOA. OPTIONS The City Council has four (4) options to consider regarding this appeal. 1. Overturn the Planning Commission decision and APPROVE Appeal No. 2001-02. 2. Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and DENY Appeal No. 2001-02. 3. Direct staff to perform a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow dance halls, nightclubs, etc. in the CB-1 zone subject to a conditional use permit. 4. Continue the application and provide direction to staff. Denial of the applications would leave anon-conforming business with no conditional use permit and no conditions to regulate. The result of a nonconforming business would be continued problems with cruising, loitering and other police issues. In addition, other uses within Lynwood Plaza would remain nonconforming. Support of the conditional use permit and zone change would include mandatory and specific conditions of approval in order to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of citizens working and residing in the area. Conditions would include implementing and maintaining a security plan reviewed and approved by the Sheriff Department; implementing an exterior fighting plan, parking plan, submitting a new fire sprinkler plan, and submitting for building plan check. If conditions of approval are implemented and adhered to, the required findings in LMC Section 25-25.7 could be made to approve the conditional use permit. In addition, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and appropriate mitigation measures have been required in order to reduce negative impacts to a level of insignificance. The zone would provide EI Farallon with an opportunity to be conforming and mitigate impacts on properties in the vicinity. If the City Council directs staff to draft a zoning ordinance amendment, the appeal would be tabled until the Planning Commission and City Council conduct public hearings for the zoning ordinance amendment. Staff does not recommend this option. Continuing this item may not further the public interest, as this is the fourth public hearing. Staff does not recommend this option. SUMMARY & CONCLUSION If the City Council elects to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission, the Council would introduce the ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 first, otherwise the conditional use permit (CUP) would be null and void. The second motion would be to adopt the resolution denying Appeal No. 2001-02 and upholding the decision of the Planning Commission. If the project is approved, the EI Farallon restaurant would be scheduled for hearing before the Planning Commission within six (6) months to review the status of compliance with mandatory conditions of approval. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNP,VG\STAFFRPT1cup.zaelfarallon.cc.doc 3 If the City Council elects to support the appeal and thereby overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, the Council would adopt the resolution to approve Appeal 2001-02. The City Council needs to carefully review and enforce the need to protect surrounding residential properties from deleterious affects of unregulated businesses. The City Council also needs to be mindful that businesses with historical enforcement problems need to be given adequate opportunity to comply before aggressive enforcement is contemplated. A zone change and conditional use permit with strict conditions is a good first step in ensuring that the business as well as residents issues are taken into consideration and resolved in a timely manner. If the applicants fail to abide by the conditions set forth in the resolution, the City can consider other options including revocation of the conditional use' permit and business licenses. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a public hearing and after considering public oral and written comments to close the public hearing and choose one of following options: 1) Adopt the resolution to APPROVE Appeal No. 2001-02 and overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, thereby denying the project. 2) Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and introduce the ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 and adopt the resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. 3) Direct staff to draft a Zoning Ordinance Amendment and thereby table the appeal, zone change and conditional use permit. 4) Continue the public hearing and direct staff. Attachments: Project Profile Location Map Appeal No. 2001-02 application List of citizens providing public testimony Sheriff Report Resolution Approving Appeal No. 2001-02 Ordinance Approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 Environmental Documentation Security Plan Lighting Plan Traffic/Parking Plan Floor Plan H:\WORDF[LEIPLAAINING\STAFFRPT1cup.zc.elfarallon.cc.doc 4 PR0,7ECT PROFILE Zone Change 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit 2000-31 3551 Martin Luther King ]r. Boulevard 1. Source and Authority Lynwood Municipal Code (LMC) Section 25-7(b) identifies permitted uses in the CB-1 zone; LMC Section 25-7.2(c) identifies prohibited uses in the CB-1 zone; LMC Section 25-10.a(f)(1) identifies dance halls as conditionally permitted in the C-3 zone; LMC Section 25-15 addressed nonconforming land uses and structures; LMC Section 25-25.7 sets forth required findings to approve a conditional use permit; LMC Section 25-27 addresses zone changes. 2. Property Size and Location The Lynwood Plaza is triangular in shape and bounded by Abbott Road to the north; Norton Avenue to the south; Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to the east; and San Luis Avenue to the west. The Lynwood Plaza is comprised of five (5) buildings, eight (8) parcels and totals approximately 551,890 (12.67 acres) square feet in area. Currently, EI Farallon totals 14,779 square feet. The proposed expansion is 2,890 square feet that would bring the business total to 17,816 square feet. 3. Existing Land Uses Subject: Multiple Tenants Commercial North: Single-Family Residential South: Commercial East: Commercial West: Single-Family Residential 4. Land Use Designations General Plan Zoning Subject: Commercial CB-1 (Controlled Business) North: Single-Family Resid. R-1 (Single-Family Residential) South: Commercial H-M-D (Hospital-Medical-Dental) East: Commercial CB-1, C-2 and H-M-D West: Single-Family Resid. R-1 (Single-Family Residential) 5. Site Plan Review The Site Plan Review Committee has reviewed the proposed project and recommended conditions of approval are included in Resolution 2812. 6. Zoning Enforcement History The business is currently nonconforming and has an extensive police response record. (See attached report) 7. Public Response At the last Planning Commission meetings on December 12, 2000 and January 9, 2001, extensive public testimony was provided. \\LYN_SRV t\VOL3\WORDFILE\PLAN;9I;VG\STAFFRPT\cup2000-3 Ldoc 4 LOCATION MAP G-~ Itf. f ~~ Oi ` N •1 h '1 Yf „1 "1 ~ b °: A 61 N ~ p 8 ! ~ ^ ~ OJ I LOMB' ~!0 ~!9 e ~nz =B ~ i " ~ al,, L r U' r 0~ 19 a !g '' ~ti ,i5u~. h~ 07 of a SS 5'~ ~ r~3/ c e ,z! 7 aN }6y e t lofon ° 36y~ 52 ~ . 3 4S '° sa 0 a 3SSe sJ a2 2 r70 gS p rorla e St 'e r . ~ : ~SS~ ar v i W JDYr17 ~ .~cr• C , m SS ' w ff 56 S"6 ~ s~ ~ g. „ ~e JAB ~L_ (bC YY b v ~~ a S9 rv J6 '° \ 0 3, Is>o C7C'C - /GVSD _ 60 Se7 RC nnPG r ~ j 0570 ~~~ ~ s, 7 N h 43l 57 90 - ,,, ~ ' SG •~ SJ i to 2 ~ /I e C ABB(7TT d ~ O ~ 3y3~ 77 O gSAC- 6 70 55~/ Ir:Ir Ac ~,0 . 1C- R-I Z h h^'~rh~° ~ ~lal3j Pz ~°~ „) _ I ~ ~. ROAD o o Aeaorr 9<fg _ w~ / 0 9f.29 r. ~J r~/ OD U' ~ 1g ~ SO "'Jiid M 2 ~ _22J 2'i aka ~ ° 1. 0 o~y/ Q l~j' ~ ~( ~ 20 es a /e acl I: ,. ~ J~ ' /~ / J. ~ ~" ' i ALMA • .~~` 6,~ 5~ ,. Q ,~' 3S S~ x ob ; p S 3C ,, l ~y ,~3~~ I r'.` o io 17 ~~ ~ 3 ~\ ). J6' , ~o ~ , p3( 'Q ~0'f BRENTON °e ~' 1\7 X ni~ bet • Jl 30 29 }2g S \00 • 70 . e' 227p' ..f s. ao as f9 w ! .4r ~0~ 5 ~7~ ~ ~~ ~j 67 y „ r 2/~~ J ~) e T O q 7477 sL» ''[Cfr o N ° !e 7~0 207grv W 31 677 saq sa is '' j V ' g 9 "' C v _ ~ 3s?7 j ° 62 g3 g9 _ g5 6 . g ~~~ A C`~~ 7 ~ ff T m srl x645 iSl3 3i 11' 3SP 3sr11 5 ~~ ~p ~ N •y r ° 2 7 .e5 ~ ~ / y 7 4 1O ~ so so so •^ MERTON I f0 S9 i SO f0 ~ 1. I f a J ~ I v O w I cd ~ I ~ a 5 ~~ ; ~) ~~«~ , n9 a.rs ~m ~s CascNo. ZONE CHANGE 2000-03 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2000-31 Site Address: 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD Applicant Name: HERMELIO FRANCO [ ] 300' or [ ] 500' Radius Map ~'8pTT RD ':~~sj04~ 9~~ / /~ ~~ ~~ ~'~ ~~L d ~"LO~'' PLAN ~--E S ~~- ~ 16 ,~®~ ~ ~ 11~ 5~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\ ~\ o, ` '~\\\`vr ~~/ ~ ~ J ~ f ~ t ~ EL FARALL aa't~e Z 1~~~ 9 ONNIGHT CLUB ® ~,~„~ pCP.i<n111G ~i ~cs~cv AND RESTAURANT B~ 8050 E. fiorentz Rve., see. Qob 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. D~i~ne~,, C~ 9!J~~O '0d~ c~69) ~za-}oz v Lynwood, Ca 90262 ,, ~I ~ ~. ~~,,yyyy~1 ~ \ ,., 5''~~ ~. Q 1~ V ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000- 03; THEREBY DENYING APPEAL NO. 2001-02 AND UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION; WITH RESPECT TO TRACT 20680, LOTS 70 and 71; ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 6191 PAGE 18 PARCELS 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008 AND 009; ALSO KNOWN AS THE LYNWOOD PLAZA AND BORDERED BY ABBOTT ROAD TO THE NORTH; MARTIN LUTHER KING, ]R. BOULEVARD TO THE WEST; SAN LUIS AVENUE TO THE EAST; AND NORTON AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, LYNWOOD CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINES) TO C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL). WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council conducted a public hearing on April 17, 2001 in order to hear Zone Change No. 2000-03; and approved such zone change thereby upholding the decision of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council considered all written and oral testimony at such public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood did pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on March 13, 2001 and approved Zone Change No. 2000-03 regarding the above-identifies properties; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood did pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on January 9, 2001 on a proposed Zone Change regarding the above-identified properties and the item was continued to March 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood did pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on December 12, 2000 on a proposed Zone Change with respect to the above-identified properties and continued the item; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been added to the project to reduce possible impacts to a level of insignificance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zoning of these properties would be consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan. Section 1. The Lynwood City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed Zone Change will be consistent with the objectives and the development policies of the City of Lynwood. B. The proposed Zone Change will not unreasonable constrain the use of property by landowners and developers. C. The Proposed Zone Change will not adversely affect the General Plan. H:1 W ORD FILE~PLANNIWGU2ESOS~xso.e IfaraOon.zc.approve.doc D. A Heavy Commercial zoning designation of the subject properties would be compatible with surrounding land uses. E. A Zone Change from Controlled Business to Heavy Commercial would be consistent with the Goals and policies of the General Plan. F. At least two (2) non-conforming properties would become legal properties and business establishments. G. The rezoning would allow property owners additional land uses that could be established and operated. H. The infrastructure is adequate to support the rezoning. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determination hereby approves Zone Change No. 2000-03. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADDOPTED this day of , 2001. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney Planning Commission H:1W ORDFILE~PLA~T[ICG~RESOSUeso.elfanllon.u.appmve.dac PAUL. H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Department 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD HEREBY DENIES APPEAL NO. 2001-02, THEREBY UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-31 PERMITTING THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AND DANCE HALL (EL FARALLON} AT 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD, IN THE CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council conducted a public hearing on April 17, 2001 in order to hear Appeal No. 2001-02; a request to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission and deny Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council considered all written and oral testimony at such public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on March 13, 2001 conducted a public hearing on the subject applications and approved Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on January 9, 2001 conducted a public hearing and the subject application was continued for sixty (60) days to March 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on December 12, 2000 conducted a public hearing on the subject application and the item was continued to the next regular meeting; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that the proposal may have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been added to the project to reduce possible impacts to a level of insignificance. Section 1. The Lynwood City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed project is adequate in size and shape to accommodate expansion of an existing restaurant and dance hall within an existing multiple tenant building. B. The proposed project, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the value of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety or welfare provided conditions of approval are completed and maintained. C. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation. H:~ W ORDFI LEAP LA1.T INGUtESOS4eso.appeal?001-02.approre.doc D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit is in compliance with all provisions set forth in the Lynwood Municipal Code provided a Zone Change is approved. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby denies Appeal No. 2001-02 upholding the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the California Building Code, the Health and Safety Code and the Los Angeles County Fire Code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review. 3. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION 4. All applicable construction permits and approvals for the 2,890 square foot expansion of the business shall be obtained within one hundred eighty (180) days from date of approval. 5. The applicant shall implement and maintain a detailed traffic circulation and parking plan within ninety (90) days of adoption by the City Council. 6. The applicant shall implement and maintain a detailed lighting plan for the parking lots areas and the exterior of the business within ninety (90) days of adoption by the City Council. 7. All parking and traffic circulation areas under EI Farallon lease shall be repaved and slurry sealed. All parking stalls shall have double-stripe delineation and provide concrete bumper stops within ninety (90) days of adoption by the City Council. 8. This conditional use permit approval is contingent upon adoption of an ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 by the Lynwood City Council. Denial of Zone Change No. 2000-03 would make this conditional use permit approval null and void. 9. The applicant shall paint the exterior of the business within forty-five (45) days of adoption by the City Council. Colors shall be reviewed and approved by the Redevelopment Division. 10. The applicant shall implement a comprehensive security plan as approved by the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department within ninety (90) days of adoption by the City Council. Such security plan shall be maintained for the life of the conditional use permit. 11. The applicant shall submit a detailed sign plan to be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. Such sign plans shall include individual channels letters and a maximum twenty-five percent (25%) window signage. 2 12. Their shall be no adult entertainment activities pursuant to Lynwood Municipal Code Section 25-16.19. 13. The subject conditional use permit shall be brought back to the Planning Commission for review of said conditions within six (6) months of approval. 14. All conditions of approval shall be printed on the cover page of revised plans. 15. The applicant shall provide proof of City Council lawful approval of a live entertainment permit, to the satisfaction of the City Clerk. 16. The hours of operation of the dance hall shall be between 8:00 p.m. and 2:00 am. unless the time period is more restricted as outlined in the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department's Security Plan. 17. The applicant shall not exceed building occupancy loads as established under the Uniform Building Code, Los Angeles County Fire Code, or more restrictive based on the Los Angeles County Sheriff security plan. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION 18. All construction shall meet or exceed the minimum building standards that are referenced in the following codes: The Uniform Building Code -1997 edition; The Uniform Plumbing Code - 1997 edition; The Uniform Mechanical Code - 1997 edition; The Uniform Fire Code - 1997 edition; The National Electric Code - 1996 edition; All as amended by the California Building Code of 1998. In case where the provisions of the California Building Code, the City of Lynwood Municipal Code, or the plans or specifications in these plans may conflict, the more restrictive provisions shall govern. 19. The applicant shall submit new sprinkler plans covering proposed expansion area. Such plan shall re reviewed and approved by the Plan Check Engineering consultant. Applicable permits shall be obtained. 20. The applicant shall provide a revised floor plan indicating accessible men's restrooms. Such plan shall be submitted to for plan check review. FIRE DEPARTMENT 21. Plans shall be submitted to the L. A. County Fire Department for plan check at the Fire Protection Division, 5823 Rickenbacker Road, Commerce, CA 90040- 3027, (323) 890-4243. CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 22. The applicant shall remove existing window signage in excess of twenty-five percent (25%) of the gross window area. 23. The applicant shall obtain an electrical permit and remedy electrical code violations on the exterior of the business. H:\WORDFILE~PLA~7:IT~G~RESOS'veso.sppea12001-02.appmve.doc - 3 - Section 3. A copy of Resolution No to the applicant: and its conditions shall be delivered Section 4. Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may result in revocation or modification of the Conditional Use Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled meeting. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2001. ATTEST: PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Department APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING APPEAL NO. 2001- 02; THEREBY OVERTURNING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DENYING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-03, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) TO C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) FOR THE LYNWOOD PLAZA, AND DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-31, A REQUEST TO EXPAND THE EXISTING EL FARALLON RESTAURANT AND DANCE HALL AT 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on April 17, 2001 and approved Appeal No. 2001-02 thereby overturning the decision of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council considered all pertinent facts, oral and written testimony; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on December 12, 2000 conducted a public hearing on the subject application and continued the item to the next regular meeting; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on January 9, 2001 conducted a public hearing on the subject application and continued the item for sixty (60) days; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on March 13, 2001 conducted a public hearing on the subject applications and approved Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; and WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposal may have a significant effect on the environment, there may not be a significant effect in this case as mitigation measures were developed to reduce possible negative impacts to a level of insignificance, pursuant to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines as amended; Section 1. The Lynwood City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed project may adversely effect the comprehensive General Plan. The proposed zone change may allow more intensive and/or obtrusive land uses to establish. B. The proposed location of the zone change may not be in accord with the objectives of the zoning code. Additional land uses permitted in a less restrictive commercial zone may not be able to comply with required development standards. H:\W ORDFILE\PLANK[NGIRESOS4eso.cc.denydfarallon.doc C. The proposed location of the zone change may be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The land uses permitted in a less restrictive commercial zone may negatively impact properties in the vicinity.. D. The effects of the zone change may not have the implementation of mitigation measures that would reduce negative impacts on properties in the vicinity to a level of insignificance. Such mitigation measures would pertain to effects on noise, light and glare, transportation/circulation, and public services. E. The proposed project may adversely effect the comprehensive General Plan, specifically the following goals arfd policies; 1) Ensure that residential neighborhoods are protected from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses which may have a negative impact on the residential environment. (Land Use Element, Policy 3, page LU-19) 2) Prevent and mitigate the adverse impacts of noise from internal and external sources on Lynwood residents. (Circulation Element, Goal 1, page N-5) 3) Provide a pattern, scale, and design of land uses which promote individual safety. (Safety Element, Policy 5, page S-12) F. The proposed location of the conditional use may not be in accord with the objectives of Chapter 25, Zoning of the Lynwood Municipal Code, and the purpose of the zone in which the site is located. The zoning code strives to provide land uses and commercial establishments that serve the needs of residents city wide. The subject business may be creating negative impacts on adjacent residential and commercial properties. G. The location of the proposed conditional use and the conditions under which it operates or maintained may be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The establishment has a negative history of excessive police response requests. Residents have testified at public hearings of criminal activities and disturbance of their peace and welfare. H. The conditional use may not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the zoning chapter. The Lynwood Municipal Code requires dance halls and establishments that serve alcohol to have a conditional use permit and this business does not have such permits. The applicant has not demonstrated that he has implemented mitigation measures that would reduce negative impacts on properties in the vicinity to a level of insignificance. Such mitigation measures pertain to effect of noise, light and glare, transportation/circulation, and public services. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Appeal No. 2001-2 and thereby denies Zone Change No. 2000-03 and denies Conditional Use Permit No. 2000- 31. Section 3. A copy of the Resolution No. shall be delivered to the applicant. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Dept. PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood 2001. RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney H:\WORDFILE~PLAI\TIt`GUtESOStrew.cc.denyel(arallon.doc _ 3 +~oauu. LhnL.~J 001-D '"' °"' F REPORT DAT Event Date Incident Date Range Tim_ e_ Ra= R D RO BBB ER - Address Y, STRONG-ARM STAT CD. 041 ROBBERY, STRONG-ARM: Highway, Etc. \ 06/27/2000 06/27/2000 ~'~ ~ 21:30 2112 3551 1 ROBBERY, STRONG-ARM: Highway, EtC. MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 ROBBERY, STRONG-ARM ASSAULT, FELONY STAT CD. 051 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW -Gun 03/2fi/2000 03/26/2D00 01:55 2112 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW -Gun 1 ASSAULT, FELONY ASSAULT, FELONY STAT Cp. 053 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW -Other Dangerous Weapon 02!15/2000 02/15/2000 02/15/2000 01:21 01:21 2112 3551 1 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW -Other Dangerous W ponlN LUTHER KING ~ ASSAULT, FELONY ASSAULT, FELONY STAT CD. 054 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW -Hands, Feet, Fist, Etc. 03/12/2000 03/12/2000 03/12/2000 01:15 01:15 2112 3551 1 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW -Hands, Feet, Fist, EtMARTIN LUTHER KING ~ ASSAULT, FELONY GRAND THEFT STAT CD. 089 GRAND THEFT: Oth 0 er (From Boat, Pla 5!30/2000 05/29/2000 05/30/2000 23:30 01:30 2 ne, P ~ Res, Yard Etc) 112 8551 1 GRAND THEFT: Other (From Boat Pl , ER KING es L , ane, Pr 1 GRAND THEFT E C) ot R Yard GRAND THEFT VEHICLE (GTA) 0 1 02/08/2000 0 0 2000 56 Automobile/Passenger Van 02/08 2D00 23. 0 OE 30 2E 12 T 05/23/2000 3 05/23/2000 05/29/2000 05/29/2000 17:06 2112 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING 2112 3551 07/04/2000 07/03/2000 07!04/2000 MARTIN LUTHER KING KING 22:00 01:30 2112 3551 02/08/2000 02/07/2000 D2/08/2000 23:00 01:30 2112 07/23/2000 KING 3551 07/22/2000 07/23/2000 22:00 03:00 2112 3551 08/26/2000 08/26/2000 ~/1ARTIN LUTHER KING 08/28/2000 08/28/2000 02'32 2112 3551 08/2 MARTIN LUTHER KING MARTIN LUTHER KI 8/2000 08/27/2000 08/28/2000 22:00 02:00 2112 NG MARTIN LUTHER KING 3551 9 GRAND THEFT VEHICLE (GTA): Automobil 9 GR HER KING sen e/P AND THEFT Vt~HICLE (GTA) as ger Van ASSAULT, MISDEMEANOR STAT CD. 144 ASSAULT MISDEME 0 , 1/15/2000 01/15/2000 ANOR: Hands, Feet, 00:45 Fist, Etc 05/23/2000 05/23/2000 2112 3551 01 • . MARTIN LU ..,~` ~'~ zooo-os 2000-0301 2000-0477 2000-10257 BLVD BLVD BLVD BLVD BLVD BLVD BLVD BLVD BLVD BLVD BLVD BLVD .20 2112 3551 THER KING BLVD 2 ASSAULT, MISDEMEANOR: Hands, Feet, Fist, Et~RTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 2 ASSAULT, MISDEMEANOR VEHICLE AND BOATING LAWS STAT CD. 255 VEHICLE AND BOATING LAWS: Misdemeanor ovos/2ooo ovos/2ooo 01/16/2000 01/16/2000 19:18 2112 3551 20:00 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 05/06/2000 05/06/2000 2112 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 02:10 2112 3551 3 VEHICLE AND BOATING LAWS; Misdemeanor MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 3 VEHICLE oNn QnwT~.,,, . -.___ VEHICLE BURGLARY v...~ STAT CD. 340 VEHICLE BURGLARY: Auto/Passenger Van Burglary 2000-02620 2000-09817 2000-10206 2000-12869 2000-13106 2000-14295 2000-16705 2000-16833 2000-16835 2000-00957 2000-09768 2000-00576 2000-01065 2000-08660 Version: 2.05.10.0 system: LARC~s ,^. Los Angeles Coun ~~~ -Rpt• ~~_ ~-oot-v. CRIME INFORMATION k ~~rtment Date 8 Time 8y STAT CODE ~ ORT 09/9 3/2000 1 2:4 RD: 2112, 3551 REPORT DATE: 01/01/2000 to 08/31/2000 Event Date Incident Date Range Tim=e R D Page: 2 0° ~ VEHICLE BURGLARY - Address AID X_Street Fiie Numo~ 340 VEHICLE BURGLARY: Auto/Passenger Van Burglary 04/23/2000 04/23/2000 04/23/2000 15:15 15:30 2112 3551 1 VEHICLE BURGLARY: Auto/Passenger Van Burg aAryTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 VEHICLE BURGLARY 2coo-o7~- THEFT, PETTY ($400 OR LESS) STAT CD. 389 THEFT, PETTY ($400 OR LESS): Other (From Prvt Res, Boaf, Plane,Yard) 06/20/2000 06/13/2000 06/13/2000 00:00 01:00 2112 3551 1 THEFT, PETTY ($400 OR LESS): Other (From Prvt Res~BoatH P ane,Yard LVD 1 THEFT, PETTY ($400 OR LESS) 2000-118'7 MISDEMEANORS, MISCELLANEOUS STAT CD. 399 MISDEMEANORS, MISCELLANEOUS: All Other Misdemeanors 03/06/2000 03/06/2000 03/06/2000 02:43 02:43 2112 3551 08/13/2000 08/13/2000 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 22.02 2112 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 2000-04368 2 MISDEMEANORS, MISCELLANEOUS: All Other Misdemeanors 2000-1572 2 MISDEMEANORS, MISCELLANEOUS NON-CRIMINAL STAT CD. 442 NON-CRIMINAL: Property LosUFound/Recovered 02/05/2000 01/29/2000 23.41 2112 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 NON-CRIMINAL: Property LosUFound/Recovered 1 NON-CRIMINAL 2000-02453 TOTAL Cases 24 Version 0 0 system: rLARCIS ,,.., Los An Sheriffs ^n RAt• ID: G-00 artment . 1-D Date 8~ Time RD: 21 2 09/12/2000 12: , REPORT DATE: 01/01/2000 to 0 31/2000 ;~ Event Date Incident Date Range Time Range R D s Page: 1 0 ° _ Address GRAND THEFT APB _ X_Street File Num; - STAT CD. 089 GRAND THEFT: Other (From Boat, Plane, Prot Res, Yard 02!25/2000 02/25/2000 19 Etc) 3 --_ __- , : 0 2112 3555 ER KING BLVD g 1 GRAND THEFT: Other (From Boat, Plane Prvt R L E C) , es, Yard 1 GRAND THEFT 2000-0~'; I VEHICLE BURGLARY STAT CD. 340 VEHICLE BURGLARY: Auto/P assenger Van Burglary 02/04/2000 02/03/2000 02/04/2000 10:30 01:30 2112 3555 TlN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 VEHICLE BURGLARY: Auto/P assenger Van Burg ary 1 VEHICLE BURGLARY 2000-0236 NON-CRIMINAL STAT CD. 444 NON-CRIMINAL: Suspicious Circumstances, Possible Criminal A 06/18/2000 06/18/2000 19 0 i : ct vity 0 2112 3555 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 NON-CRIMINAL: Suspicious Circumstanc G P es, ossibte Criminal Activity 1 NON-CRIMINAL 2000-11-38 TOTAL Cases 3 Version: 2.05.10.0 ~. .,~ ~ ~~ ~~'~ P.O. 032135 c~t3, of ~Y1~~OOD •u.~...E tiC• C~i• ity ~l~(eeting ChaQQenges i' ~ , 11330 BULLIS ROAD I I LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (310) 603.0220 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Appeal No. 2001-02: City Council Hearing Planning Commission Decision to Auprove Zone Chance No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Lynwood City Council will hear an appeal that has been filed regarding the Planning Commission decision to approve Zone Change No. 2000-03, changing the zoning designation from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial); and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31, to expand an existing restaurant and dance hall (EI Farallon) approximately 2,890 square feet, at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Lynwood, California. Legal descriptions are on file in the Planning Division, Community Development Department. Environmental Assessment: Mitigated Negative Declaration. Any person interested in expressing an opinion on these matters is invited to attend the public hearing and offer testimony in support of, or in the opposition to, the proposed application. CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 TIME: 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard. PLACE: City Hall Council Chambers 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, Ca 90262 Anyone wishing to offer written testimony for or against the proposed application may write to the City Clerk or the Community Development Director at 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262. All proceedings pertaining to the above applications will be in conformance with the Lynwood Municipal Code, as amended. Dated the 20th day of March, 2001 By: Andrea Hooper, City Clerk Publish: Lynwood Press (Wave) March 29, 2001 H:\ W ORDFILE\PLANNING\PUBNOT[C\appea12001-02. doc ' ~ lf! I'I~h ~ ~? ;~i~ift' ~T ~# ~ City of ~ ~T~j~~~' (~L~'~ V, I ,~, aY~ ~'~ 4~ v4 Cify ulileefing ChaQQenges !;j~~~l 11330 BULLIS ROAD , LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (310) 603-0220 ~QtvIMUiVITY DEVELOPMENT r1FDnrs~-A~a~t~~-,- Receipt No. Not applicable ~~.~e<<~ 2~~'!-vim Date Filed March 19, 2001 Appl RedC'd By Grant Taylor Zone Change 2000-03 and Case No (s) Conditional Use Permit 2000-31 2814 -zone change Reso No. 2812 -conditional use permit PLANNING ACTION APPLICATION FORM Ri~ardor~anc~iez 11330 Bullis Road L nwood CA 90262 ' y ~ (310) 603-0220 Name of applicant Address (City, State, Zip Code) Telephone No. 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (E1 Farallon Restaurant & Dance Hall) Project Address CB-1 (Controlled Business) 6191-018-008 Tract 20680, Lot 70 Zone County Assessors Information Book Page Parcel No. Legal Description Check Tvae of Permitts) Requested Please submit plans with a complete application. For Site Plan Review submit 10 Plans ONLY. xx gppeal -City Council (lo Copies) Appeal -Planning Commission (_ copies) Certificate of Compliance ( Copies) Conditional Use Permit (is Prans) Environmental Assessment (-copies) General Plan Amendment (zs Prans) Home Occupation Permit (-copies) Lot Line Merger (_ Copies) Lot Merger (-copies) Property Owner Notice (-copies) Modification of Cond. Use (is copses) Sign Permit (z copies) Site Plan Review (io copies) Tentative Parcel Map (zs copies) Tentative Subdivision Map (is copies) VarlanCe (2s Copies) Zone Change (is copies) Zoning Ord. Adjustment (-copies) Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment ( Copies) PURPOSE OF APPLICATION lS)• [X ]New Construction x) Existing Construction. Request to change the Lynwood Plaza zoning from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial) and expand the E1 Farallon was approved by the Lynwood Planning Commission on March 13, 2001. Three (3) public hearings were conducted. Staff and the Planning Commission received extensive public comment and concerns pertaining to loitering, drugs, gangs, shootings, cruisin other po ice re ate issues. ~ omp a>_n s nc a g' noise trespassing and Plaza parking lot and surrounding n~ig~b_Qr 'ods od Ap t Signature March I9, 2001 Date h:\word filelplanning\forrns\EN VA SS2. DOC / Revised 03-06-OI 3 ~ti y~ iVi~1l~ r c ZU~1 f~Y fPL, ~~~Ily(~ ~lli1 -- - - - ' ' `""^"' ~ wR r~NivN1ryG AND DEVELOPN"tENT APPROVALS Employees of the Planning Division will ive eve files an application for Planning or Development app ovals. a However tthenyone who proof is on the applicant to make the showing necessary before an burden of can be granted. Also there is no guarantee -expressed or com liedpe th t anapproval will be granted by the agency or commission which has authority p the matter. y permit The applicant shall understand also that each matter must be carefully investigated and after a staff investigation has been made, or a public hearing has been held, the staff's recommendation or decision may be contrary to a position taken in any preliminary discussions. The staff is not permitted to assist the applicant or any opponents of any applicant in preparing arguments for or against a request. March 19, 2001 Date I have read the foregoing and understand that I HAVE ~'HE BURDEN OF PROOF in the matter arising under the application made by me.. -,, i~/ Applicant Signature Appeal No. 2001-02 (ZC 2000-03 & CUP 2000-31) Application Case Number. h:lwordfilelplanninglformslEN VASS2.DOC Revised 03-06-01 4 ,•-.. March 22, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council C/0 Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, CA 90262 RE: Appeal 2001-02: EI Farallon Restaurant, 3351 Martin Luther King ]r. Blvd. Dear Council Members: The Planning Commission approved applications for Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 on March 13, 2001 regarding the EI Farallon Restaurant. During the three (3) public hearings, the Planning Commission received considerable public testimony including loitering, drug sales, gang activity, gun fire, shootings, cruising, noise issues and trespassing that directly affect the surrounding commercial properties and residents. The appeal is based on the following: The Planning Commission failed to take into consideration the deleterious effects this establishment has on the surrounding properties based on the testimony brought forth by the public. Expansion of this land use is contrary to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, the surrounding businesses and residents. Therefore, based on the public concerns, both residents and community issues, the Planning Commission decision should be overturned, the City Council should approve Appeal No. 2001-02 and deny Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. Attached is the City of Lynwood Appeal application and a list of citizens who spoke in opposition at the Planning Commission public hearings. Sincerely, Ricardo Sanchez, Mayor Pro Team Lynwood City Council APPEAL NO. 2001-02 CITIZENS SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION EL FARALLON RESTAURANT Zone Change No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 December 12, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. Arvin Moore, 10740 San Luis Ave. Erasmo Castro, 10611 San Juan Ave. Raul Vallejo, 3825 Abbott Rd. Alma Gonzalez, 3905 Abbott Rd. Caroline Castillo, 10881 San Miguel Ave. Miguel Hernandez, ????? San Miguel Ave. January 9, 2001 Planning Commission Meeting Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. John Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. Raul Vallejo, 3825 Abbott Rd. Helen Lustig, 3907 Abbott Rd. Sandra Bustamente, ???? San Juan Ave. Amy Castro, 10116 San Juan Ave. Arturo Lopez, 4331 Lugo Ave. ?????, 10150 San Juan Ave. March 13, 2001 Planning Commission Meeting Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. Helen Lustig, 3907 Abbott Rd. Maria ???, 10616 San Juan Ave. John Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. APPEAL NO. 2001-02 CITIZENS SPEAKING IN SUPPORT EL FARALLON RESTAURANT Zone Change No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 December 12, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting Hermelio Franco, 9369 Gainford Ave., Downey (business owner) Sal Preciado, 13658 Hawthorne Blvd., Hawthorne (contractor) Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest (architect) Selena Martinez, 8050 E. Florence, Downey (architect) )anuary 9, 2001 Planning Commission Meeting Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest Ken Swift, 11126 Duncan Ave. Sal Preciado, 13658 Hawthorne Blvd., Hawthorne Edwin Jacinto, 11824 Beach St. Jose Salachi, 12321 Alpine Ave. (read letter on behalf of Domitilia Aguilar,(LUSD) Jose Salachi, 12321 Alpine Ave. Dr. Wallace, 11321 Bullis Rd. (LUSD) Fernando Barregan, 11072 5th St. Ofelia Villanueva, (address inaudible) Rosa Mesa, 10895 Otis Ave. ]im Morton 10112 Long Beach Blvd. Rojero Duran, 2835 Glenwood, South Gate March 13, 2001 Planning Commission Meeting Selena Martinez, 8050 E. Florence Ave., Downey Ken Swift, 11126 Duncan Ave. Adolph Lopez, 11431 Plum St. ®~~~~-~' LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION, March 13, 2001 Planning Commission met in regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers. Chair Dove called the meeting to order at 6:38 p.m. Commissioner Maciel led the flag salute. Chairperson Dove presiding. Commissioner's Abarca, Barnes, Maciel, Patel, Manalapaz and Reed answered roll call. Also present were Community Development Director Chicots, Deputy City Attorney Calsada, Senior Planner Taylor, and Planning Associate Barfield. Senior Planner Taylor announced the Agenda had been duly posted in accordance with the Brown Act. ITEM #5: MINUTES Minutes of meeting for February 13 2001. Motion by Reed, 2nd by Maciel to adopt the minutes. Approved.?-0. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS Item #6: ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-06 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-31 APPLICANT: Hermelio Franco - 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Chair Dove introduced continued public hearing Item #6. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report and stated the applicant is requesting approval of a change of zoning for the property known as Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial). In addition, the applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit in order to expand the existing El Farallon Restaurant and Dance Hall 2,890 square feet. Dr teFY .~ a 4 ~'~- 4'=~~ d The existing restaurant totals 14,779 square feet and the addition, if approved, would bring the restaurant area to a total of 17,816 square feet. The conditional use permit would serve three {3) purposes to include: 1) Expand the existing restaurant and dance hall 2,890 square feet; and 2) Remove the nonconforming status of the business; and 3) Remove the nonconforming status of the alcohol license. Taylor stated the item has been continued from the December 12, 2000 and January 9, 2001 Planning Commission meetings due to a large number of public comments and concerns. Staff, the applicant and the Sheriff Department has been working to resolve issues and create a security plan for the Lynwood Plaza. The Planning Commission has four (4) options to include: 1) Deny the application; or 2) Approve the applications with strict conditions and time frames; or 3) Direct staff to draft a Zoning Ordinance Amendment; or 4) Continue the item. Attached are documents for denial and approval. If the Commission elects to approve the application, the item would be forwarded to the City Council. A conditional use permit only requires Commission approval, where a zone change is an ordinance an also requires City Council approval. The conditional use permit is null and void unless the zone change is approved by the City Council and there is a fifteen (15) day appeal period. Senior Planner Taylor introduced Lieutenant Michael Herek of the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department to explain a proposed security plan. Lt. Herek explained a security plan would be a contract between the Sheriff and the business owner and would initially include seven (7) deputies and one (1) sergeant for a period of ninety (90) days. After 90 days the security plan effectiveness would be evaluated and if warranted, revised. The security plan would prohibit cruising, close off rear driveways after 10:00 and channel traffic toward Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. The security plan would include a two (2) block radius around Lynwood Plaza to protect the adjacent residential neighborhoods. .: ~ ~ ~ Barnes inquired if the security plan would interfere within the business. Maciel inquired about the security plan effect on City patrols. Lt. Herek explained the security plan is for the parking lot and the area around Lynwood Plaza and private security is used inside the business. The security plan is in addition to the City contract and City patrols would not be affected. Manlapaz inquired about involvement of City in security plan. Dove inquired about security plan not depleting Sheriff services. Abarca inquired about other cities that have contract between the sheriff and private citizens. Maciel inquired about City liability. Calsada inquired about liability and area coverage. Lt. Herek explained the security plan does not include the City. The security plan would not deplete City police services. Other cities to have sheriff citizen contracts include West Hollywood and Pico Rivera. The City is not liable as the contract would be initiated between the Sheriff and Hermelio Franco and includes a 3% liability fee. Lt. Herek explained private security cannot patrol public property and is therefore not as effective as the Sheriff do. The sheriff can detain and arrest people inside and outside the business. Chicots commented the conditional use permit requires a security plan for the life of the business as approved by the Sheriff and the City. Said revisions would be reviewed and approved by the Sheriff and Planning Commission. Lt. Herek presented the security plan to the audience. Dove advised the audience of proper protocol during the public hearing. In addition, Chair Dove set forth ground rules to include maximum 3 minutes, no repetition of issues and provide new testimony. Dove opened the public hearing requesting speakers in favor. Deputy City Attorney Calsada swore in all speakers in the audience. Selena Martinez, 8050 E. Florence, Downey, the architect spoke in favor. ,:-:a~a ;- Wit..-, f~ : n L Ken Swift, 11126 Duncan Ave., Lynwood, spoke in favor. Adolph Lopez, 11431 Plum St., spoke in favor. Chair Dove requested all those speakers in opposition. ~~~ Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San~e~Ave., spoke in opposition. Cited cruising, shootings, and noise. Helen Lustig, 3907 Abbott Road, spoke in opposition. Cited police issues. Raul Villejo, 3825 Abbott Road, spoke in opposition. Cited noise after 10:00 p.m. Maria ?(inaudible), 10616 San Juan Ave., spoke in opposition. Read a letter citing noise traffic and police issues. John Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave., spoke in opposition. Cited police issues and sanitary concerns. Dove closed the public hearing. Motion by Reed, 2°d by Maciel to certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration, adopt Resolution 2814 approving zone change 2000-03 and adopt Resolution 2812 approving conditional use permit 2000-31. Approved 7-0. Item #7: Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-35 APPLICANT: Lidia Mansilla, 9915 Long Beach Boulevard Barfield presented the staff report and stated the applicant is requesting approval to continue to operate a public rental hall. At the last meeting the Commission directed staff to bring back a shared parking agreement with other properties or reduce the maximum capacity to 150 persons. Mr. Barfield stated all properties have sufficient parking to accommodate 150 persons to which the property owner/applicant agrees. Dove opened the public hearing. i1 ~ r'". ~ `~' REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS PERMIT NO. 2000-31: APPLICANT: Emilio Franco- 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Bfvd. Chairperson Dove introduced item No. 13. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report summarizing the request by EI Farallon Restaurant and Dance Hall to expand 2,890 square feet. Mr. Taylor stated staff and the Sheriff Department has been working with the applicant on the security plan, staff will again meet with the applicant to confirm staff position, a neighborhood meeting will be noticed and scheduled, back to the Planning Commission for the March 13, 2001 meeting. It was moved by Commissioner Reed and seconded by Commissioner Vice-Chairperson Barnes to receive and file. ROLL CALL AYES: Commissioner(s) Abarca, Barnes, Dove, Manlapaz, Reed NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner(s) Maciel, Patel ABSTAIN: None SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL TOWN HALL MEETING: APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Chairperson Dove introduced item No. 14. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report and stated the Lynwood City Council has scheduled a Special Town Hall Meeting for Thursday, February 15, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. in Bateman Hall. The meeting is in response to the Lynwood School District plans to construct five (5) new schools and expand four (4) existing schools. Mr. Taylor identified new school locations and summarized format for the meeting. The Commission and members of the public were encouraged to attend. Chairperson Dove commented on possible effects of new school sites and school expansions. Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about effects of school expansions and new schools. Commissioner Reed commented about school overcrowding and need for City and School District to work together on the issue. It was moved by Commissioner Reed and seconded by Commissioner Abarca to receive and file. ROLL CALL AYES: Commissioner(s) Abarca, Barnes, Dove, Manlapaz, Reed NOES: None H:\WORDFILE\PLANNINGIMINUTES\Fcbrvary 13.?OOl.doc - 7 - ..-. xGENDA ITEM LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 9 2001 The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood met in a regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers at 6:35 p.m. Commissioner Abarca led the flag salute. Chairman Dove presiding. Commissioners, Abarca, Barnes, Manlapaz, Patel, and Reed answered the roll call. Commissioner Maciel was absent. Motion by Commissioner Manlapaz and seconded by Commissioner Patel to excuse Commissioner Maciel. Motion carried 6-0. Also present were Deputy City Attorney Calsada, Community Development Director Chicots, Redevelopment Manager Morales, Senior Planner Taylor and Planning Associate Barfield. Senior Planner Taylor announced the Agenda had been duly posted in accordance with The Brown Act. Senior Planner Taylor stated their would be two sets of minutes at the next meeting. REORGANIZATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Chairman Dove announced this item would be heard after the last public hearing item. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to staff's request, Chairman Dove reorganized the agenda to hear item No.8 first due to the large number of citizens present for the project. ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-03 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 20_ APPLICANT: Emilio Franco- 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Chairperson Dove introduced public hearing item No. 8 Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report and stated the applicant is requesting to change the zoning for the entire Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial) in order to expand the existing EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall another 2,890 square feet. Senior Planner Taylor stated the property is non-conforming as dance halls are first permitted in the C-3 zone subject to a conditional use permit. Senior Planner Taylor said the property is nonconforming and may continue as a dance hall or nightclub without conditions of approval or control mechanisms. The Commission has four options to include: H:\WORDFILEIPLANNINGV.fIN~TESUanuuy 9, 2001min.dot -1- 1. Deny the application 2. Approve the application with strict conditions of approval 3. Direct staff to process a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to permit dance halls in the CB-1 zone subject to a CUP 4. Continue the item. Senior Planner Taylor said staff has performed a detailed environmental review and developed a number of mitigation measures. Community Development Director Chicots stated the applicant is not ready for approval as there are several outstanding issues that are not resolved. Mr. Chicots stated the security plan is inadequate, lighting plan inadequate and traffic/parking control inadequate. The applicant needs to provide comprehensive plans and security measures to address crowd control and police problems. Mr. Chicots recommended the item be continued and the City would schedule a "Neighborhood Meeting" between the applicant and residents to discuss resolution of issues. Commissioner Reed inquired about the Mitigation measures. Senior Planner Taylor responded mitigation measures were developed pursuant to traffic, parking, noise, light and glare, air quality and public service. Chairperson Dove inquired about the security plan. Community Development Director Chicots responded. A comprehensive Secuity Plan is needed. Chairperson Dove opened the public hearing and requested the applicant and /or his representative speak first. Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest spoke in favor. Mr. Mbele is the architect and agreed to proposed conditions of approval, agreed to consult with the Sheriff and agreed to meet with neighbors and residents. Kent Swift, 11126 Duncan Avenue, spoke in favor and identified awards given to Mr. Franco. Sal Preciado, 13658 Hawthorne Blvd., Hawthorne. Contractor spoke in favor and agreed to address parking, traffic and security. Edwin Jacinto, 11824 Beach, a local business owner spoke in favor. Jose Salachi, 12321 Alpine, spoke in favor and presented awards Mr. Franco had received to the Planning Commission. Chairperson Dove advised the audience of proper protocol. Dr. Wallace, Lynwood Unified School District, 11321 Bullis Road, spoke in favor and stated he was sent by the School Superintendent to speak on behalf of him, Harold Cebrun. H:IWORDFILE~PLANNMGUIINUTESUanuuy 9, 2001min.doc -2- Fernando Barregan, 11072 5th Street, spoke in favor. Ofelia Villanueva, ???? spoke in favor. Alejandro ????, 5443 Olanda Avenue spoke in favor. Rosa Mesa, 10895 Otis Avenue, spoke in favor. Jose Salachi, read a letter from the School District President, Domitilia Aguilar who supported the project. Jim Morton, 10112 long Beach Boulevard spoke in favor. Rojero Duran (EI Farallon employee), 2835 Glenwood, South Gate spoke in favor. Chairperson Dove requested citizens wishing to speak in opposition. Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San Juan, spoke in opposition. Described Sheriff assistance during holidays, said big problem when no Sheriff and received a letter from Mr. Franco inviting her to the restaurant to discuss issues. Chairperson Dove asked Mr. Graham about the zone change proposal. She said she is against it. John Graham, 10650 San Juan, spoke in opposition. Added to his wife's concerns Raul Vallejo, 3825 Abbott Road spoke in opposition. Said the nightclub is the main business and residents are victims after 9:00 p.m. Helen Lusting, 3907 Abbott Road spoke in opposition. Said there is little business at the restaurant and the problems are with the nightclub. Sandra Bustamante, ???? San Juan spoke in opposition. Said its like the wild west at night. Amy Castro, 10116 San Juan spoke in opposition. Said she has to clean up trash on her property regularly and the business is noisy. Arturo Lopez, 4331 Lugo spoke in opposition. Regular gunfire. ???, 10150 San Juan spoke in opposition. Described gunfire. Chairperson Dove requested rebuttal comments from the applicant Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest spoke. He thanked the audience and Planning Commission for their patience. Praised Mr. Franco's community service activities. Requested a continuance. Will meet with citizens to discuss and remedy issues. Chairperson Dove closed the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Abarca to continue the item. Approved 6-0. H:IWOROFILE~PLANNINGVvI1NUTESUanuary 9, 2001min.dot -3- Commissioner Abarca asked if 30 days is enough time. Community Development Director Chicots suggested a meeting at Bateman Hall as soon as possible. Ike Mbele requested 45 days continuance and could have a meeting in a couple weeks at Bateman Hall. A member of the audience requested notification of the neighborhood meeting. Commissioner Reed amended motion to continue until March meeting, have staff send out the 300 foot Radious notice for the neighborhood meeting, Seconded by Commissioner Abarca. Approved 6-0. Senior Planner Taylor passed out a sign up sheet to the audience and requested citizens who wish to be notified of the neighborhood meeting should write down their names and addresses. Chairperson Dove declared a brief recess. Chairperson Dove reconvened the meeting at 8:15 p.m. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-23 APPLICANT: Oscar Aparicio and Sara Mata Balbuena- 10733-10749 Long Beach Blvd. Chairperson Dove introduced public hearing item No 7. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report stated the applicant is requesting approval to operate a used car sales lot in conjunction with a nonconforming auto service center. The item had been previously continued for 60 days to allow the property owner to remedy code violations and comply with conditions of approval. Mr. Taylor stated he had inspected the property on two occasions and observed substantial compliance. Chairperson Dove opened the public hearing. Oscar Aparicio, proepty owner, 10733-10749 Long Beach Blvd. Spoke in favor. Mr. Aparicio had Vanessa Balbuena translate. Mr. Aparicio inquired about conditions to be completed. Senior Planner Taylor stated he must remove the remaining inoperable vehicles at the rear of the property, pave the rear parking area and submit a landscaping plan. Mr. Taylor said the front half of the property is complete, but the rear half still needs work. Chairperson Dove closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Reed and seconded by Commissioner Abarca to adopt Resolution 2799 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-23. H:IWORDFILE~PLANNINGV.IMUTESUanusry 9, ?OOlmin.doc -4- ROLL CALL AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN Commissioner (s) Abarca, Barnes, Dove, Maciel, Manlapaz, Patel, Reed None None None ZONE CHANGE 2000-03 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2000-31 APPLICANT: Emilio Franco - 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard Chairperson Dove introduced new public hearing item No. 12. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report and stated the applicant is requesting change of zoning for the entire Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial) in order to expand the existing EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall another 2,890 square feet. Mr. Taylor stated the property is non-conforming as dance halls are first permitted in the C-3 zone subject to a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Taylor said staff is not in a position to support the project at this time due to police response issues at the property. Mr. Taylor said the Planning Commission has three options to include: 1. Deny the application 2. Approve the application with strict conditions of approval 3. Direct staff to process a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to permit dance halls in the CB-1 zone subject to a CUP. Senior Planner Taylor said the applicant has five (5) valid licenses for his business and it may be the best option to give the applicant an opportunity to become legal and remove the non-conforming status, however, strict conditions of approval would be mandatory to include having a security plan reviewed and approved by the Sheriff, have an exterior lighting plan, have a parking and traffic circulation plan, perform exterior improvements to the building and parking area, etc. Mr. Taylor said staff is recommending continuance pursuant to an environmental review, public response and Commission concerns. Chairperson Dove opened the public hearing. Emilio Franco , 9369 Gainford Avenue, Downey spoke in favor. Sal Preciado, 13658 Hawthorne Blvd., Hawthorne spoke in favor. Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest spoke in favor. Selena Martinez, 8050 E. Florence, Downey spoke in favor. Mr. Mbele sated the applicant will submit security plan, improve parking lot and provide landscaping. Also said applicant will hire a traffic consultant to prepare parking and traffic circulation plan. Chairperson Dove questioned security. H:IWOADFILE~PLPuYNINGV.11NL7E5~December 12, 2000min.doc -6- Deputy City Attorney Calsada inquired who is the property owner and is the applicant aware of the Redevelopment Agency ENA (exclusive negotiation agreement) for the Lynwood Plaza. Commissioner Abarca inquired about Redevelopment Agency plan and relocating the business. Mr. Franco said Park Turner is the owner and he is not aware of the ENA or Redevelopment Agency plans. Sal Preciado responded saying they will comply with all conditions. Discussion ensued between the Planning Commission, applicants and staff regarding business relocation and Redevelopment Agency plans. Teresa Coleman, 10650 San Juan Avenue spoke in opposition. Arvin Moore, 10740 San Luis Avenue, spoke in opposition. Erasmo Castro, 10611 San Juan Avenue, spoke in opposition. Raul Vallejo, 3825 Abbott Road, spoke in opposition. Alma Gonzalez, 3905 Abbott Road spoke in opposition. Caroline Castillo, 10881 San Miguel spoke in opposition. Miguel Hernandez, ????? San Miguel spoke in opposition. All citizens who spoke in opposition claim the business attracts gangs and a rowdy crowd; their have been shootings, car racing, loud noise, public intoxication, public urination, public sex, and they are scared for their safety and their families safety: Chairperson Dove closed the public hearing. Chairperson Dove commented on police incidents, the business operation and proposed conditions of approval. Commissioner Maciel commented on Police problems with EI Farallon and issues that must be dealt with. Suggested a neighborhood petition and speaking with City Council members. Commissioner Manlapaz concurred with Commissioner Maciel on police issues and suggested citizens speak with Council Members. It was moved by Commissioner Maciel and seconded by Commissioner Manlapaz to continue to the next regular meeting on January 9, 2001. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-32 APPLICANT: Roman Campos - 10232-10232 ~/z Long Beach Blvd. Chairperson Dove announced new public hearing item No. 13. H:1W'GRDFILEIPLM'NINGVvtINLTES\December R, 2000mm.doc -7- NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, Ca. 95814 From: City of Lynwood City of Lynwood 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, Ca. 90262 County Clerk County of Los Angeles 500 West Temple Los Angeles, Ca. 90012 SUB7ECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 2151 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: Zone Change No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 State Clearinghouse Number: N/A Lead Agency: City of Lynwood, (310) 603-0220 Project Location-Specific: The subject properties are commercial structures within the Lynwood Plaza bounded by Abbott Road to the north; Norton Avenue to the south; Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to the west; and San Luis Avenue to the east. The property totals 551,890 square feet or 12.67 acres in area. The property is further described as Tract 20680, Lots 70 and 71; Assessor's Map Book 6191, Page 18, Parcels 001, 002, 003, 005, 006, 007, 008 and 009; located at 3539 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.; 3545 through 3581 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., 3595 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.; 3700 through 3706 Abbott Road and 3898 Abbott Road. Project Description: The proposed project consists of entitlements to change the zoning designation for a shopping center (Lynwood Plaza} from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C- 3 (Heavy Commercial); and to construct a 2,890 square foot addition, within an existing structure, to an existing restaurant and dance hall, EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall, bringing the total area of the business to 17,816 square feet. The subject business is located at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, APN 6191-018-008. This is to advise that the City of Lynwood as Lead Agency has approved the above-described Negative Declaration on March 13, 2001 and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project. 1. The project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of approval of the Project. 4. A Statement of Overriding Conditions was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at Lynwood City Hall Annex, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262. Signature Date: Title: Community Development Director, City of Lynwood Date received for filing at County of Los Angeles: Date received for filing at OPR: H:1 W ORDFILE~PLANNING~not.det.zc2000-03.cup2000-3 I .doc CITY OF LYNWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CA 90262 (310) 603-0220, Extension 326 NEGATIVE DECLARATION County Clerk Corporation Division, Room 106 Post Office Box 151 Los Angeles, Ca. 9003 RE: Negative Declaration for Zoe han~e No 2000.03 and (-' r No. 2000-31 3551 Martin Luther Km Jr. Boulevard L nwooditional t se Permit To Whom It May Concern: Application Ilas been filed with the City of Lynwood for approval of the project known as Zone Chan e No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 20 0-31 located at at the Lynwood Plaza and bounded by ai,hntr u,,.,a ~...L_ __ _ ., ~ - .... .-.u1J Svc„~,e to the east. "I'he ro ert is further described as Tract 206 0 Lots 70 and 71 • Assessor's Ma Book 6191 Page 18. Parcels 001. 0~~ nn~ nn; nn~ nn~ ,,,,~ ,.,... Luther Kin Jr. Blvd. 3700 throu h 3706 Abbott Road and 3898 Abbott Road' The project is briefly described as: allow additional land uses for future develo ment. Conditional Use Permit Nn_ 2nnn-~ i • e ~~,.,,..._ would brin the business establishment total area to ] 7 819 s mare feet. In accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California El~vironmental Quality Act, State Guidelines, and the City of Lynwood Guideli~ies for the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Department of Community Development of the City of Lynwood analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, the Department prepared and hereby filed this NEGATIVE DECLARATION. A period of twenty-one (21) days from the date of filing of this NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be provided to enable public revie~~ of the project specifications and this document prior to action on the project by the Ciiy of Lynwood. A copy of the project specification is on file in the offices of the Department of Community Development, City Hall I 1330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. This Document is being filed in duplicate. Please acknowledge filing date and return the copy in the enclosed stamped, self- addressed envelope. Prepared and filed by: The Department of Community Dev lopment B Y: ~_ rant Taylor, Senior P er h:lwordfi le\plannninglfortns\negdec.doc Revised 07.27-96 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Findings Project Title: Zone Change No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 Project Site: 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Lynwood Lynwood Plaza, 3539-3595 Martin Luther King & 3700-3798 Abbott Road Tract 20680, Lots 70 and 71 Assessor's Parcel # 6191-018-001, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 009. Applicant: Hermelio Franco 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard Lynwood, CA 90262 Project Description: The proposed project consists of entitlement to construct an addition to an existing restaurant and dance hall. The initial study is based on a maximum 2,890 square feet. The subject property is located on a 551,890 square foot parcel or 12.67 acres within the new zoning designation of C-3 (Heavy Commercial). The area is bounded by Abbott Road to the north; Norton Avenue to the south; Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to the west; and San Luis Avenue to the east. Findings of Exemption: This project will not have an individual or cumulative adverse effect on fish and/ or wildlife resources in that the Initial Stud environmental review of the project nor the recordroP the proceedings~o~ lts arthro he identified any potential impacts to fish and game or such resources. pp al Certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact and that (based upon the initial study and hearing record) the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Grant Taylor Senior Planner Title C~ of Lynwoorl Lead Agency Date \\L1'N_SRV 1\VOL3IWORDFILEIPLANNING\fish&game.3551 mlk.doc CITY OF LYNWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) ~. BACKGROUND ~ . Name of proponent: Hermilio Franco {EI Farallon Restaurant) 2. Address and phone number of proponent: 3551 Martin Luther Kin Jr. Blvd. Lynwood, Ca. 90262, 3. Date of checklist submitted: November 29 2000 4. Agency Requiring Checklist : City of Lynwood 5. Name of proposal, if applicable: Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No.2000-31 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers are required on attached sheets.) 1 • Earth. Will the proposal results in: YES ~ MAYBE NO a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b) Disruption, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c) Change in topography or ground surfac e relief features? X d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e.) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X g} Exposure of people of property to geologic hazards such as earthquake, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazard? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: H ~1 WORDFILE~PLANNINGIFORMS~ZCZ000-OJ.EN V. DOC YES MAYBE NO a) Substantial air emission or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b) The creation of obecjtionable odors? - X c) Alterations of air movements, moisture , temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? 3• Water. Will the proposal result in: X a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movement, in either marine or fresh waters? X b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d} Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alterations of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f) Alterations of the direction or rates of flow of ground waters? X 9) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X I) Exposure of people or property to water relocated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: X a) Change in the diversity of sp~,cifies, or number of any species of plants {including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? N:1IVORDFILE~PLANNiNG1FORMS12C2000.03.ENV.DOC X 2 ._ ~_ YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 5• Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects.)? X b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c) Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife - habitat? X s• Noise. Will the proposal result in: a) increase in existing noise levels? X b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7• Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X $. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area.? X 9• Natural resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural sources? X b) Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resources? X ~ 0. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a•) A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances( including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan. X N:1tVORDf ILEIPLANNING~FORMS1ZC2000-03.ENV.DOC 3 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, YES distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/ Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation of movements of people and/ or goods? e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f) increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicle, bicyclist or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a) Fire Protection? b) Police Protection? c} Schools? d) Park or other recreational facilities? e} Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f) Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Wi)I the proposal result in: a} Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: H 1 W ORDFIL EIPLANNINGIFORMS12C2000-03.ENV. DOC 4 MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ..., .-. YES MAYBE NO a} Power or natural gas? X b) Communication systems? X c) Water? X d) Sewer or septic tanks? X e) Storm water drainage? X f) Solid waste and disposal? X ~ 7. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a) Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 78. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. Cultural Resources. a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? X b) Will the proposal result in the adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure , or object? X c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethic cultural values? ._ X d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X H 1 W ORDflLE~PLANNINGIFORMS~ZC?000-03.EN V.DOC 5 YES MAYBE NO 21. Mandatory Findings or Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endue well into the future.) X c) Does the project have impact which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resources is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environmental is significant.) X d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" H:\wO~FILE\PLANNING\FORMS\ZC? 000-03.ENV.DOC 6 IV• DETERMINATION ( To be completed by the Lead Agency) ON THE BASIS OF THIS INITIAL EVALUATION: I ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ~ ~ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. l I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: November 29, 2000 BY: J ~~ / ~.c. Signat Grant Taylor Print Full Name Community Development Department Department H: ~ W ORDFILEIPLANNING~FORMS1ZC2000-03.EN V. DOC 7 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF LYNWOOD DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES BACKGROUND Applicant: Hermelio Franco El Farallon Restaurant and Dance Hall 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (310) 631-4899 (310) .862-5311 Lead Agency: City of Lynwood Community Development Department 11330 Bul(is Road Lynwood, CA 90262 {310) 603-0220 Grant Taylor, Senior Planner Date of Initial Study & Mitigation Measures: November 29, 2000 PROPOSAL The proposed project is to expand an existing restaurant and dance hall 2,890 square feet within an existing multiple tenant building. The existing restaurant and dance hall totals 14,779 square feet and the addition would bring the total area to 17,816 square feet. In addition, the proposal includes changing the zoning for the entire Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial). The Lynwood Plaza contains the dance hail and a liquor store that is not permitted in the CB-1 zone and are therefore non-conforming. Non-conforming land uses may not alter or expand, and have an amortization period to convert to a conforming land use. Without approval of a zone change, the conditional use permit cannot be granted. It would not make good planning sense to only change the zone for the restaurant property, therefore, the proposed zone change is for the entire Lynwood Plaza. PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The subject property is located at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard within a Cb-1 (Controlled Business) zone. The zoning is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Commercial. The property is located on the north side of Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard between Abbott Road and Norton Avenue. The property comprises eight (8) lots that totals 551,890 square feet in area or 12.67 acres. The Lynwood Plaza is developed with a multiple tenant building that occupies about twenty percent (20%) of the lot area and is also developed with two (2) separate restaurants and two (2) office/retail buildings. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described herein have been added to this project. A Negative Declaration will be prepared. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM There are three (3) possible responses to each of the questions on the preceding Environmental Checklist Form: 1) No Impact. This response is used when the proposed project does not have any measurable environmental impact. 2) Maybe (possible impact). This response is used when the ro project may have a possible environmental impact; however, if an impact will result of the significance of the impact cannot be determined. Mitigation measures are incorporated into the resolution to reduce possible impacts to a level of insignificance. 3) Yes (potential impact). This response is used when the proposed project potentially has an environmental impact. Mitigation measures are incorporated into the resolution to reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Page 6 on the Initial Study/Environmental Checklist) Noise Impact Discussion & Mitiaation Measures 6a) Increase in existing noise levels? On weekends, the business currently generates noise levels that may be unacceptable. There is loitering, cruising, vehicle racing, etc. in conjunction with EI Farallon. Expanding an additional 2,890 square feet may increase noise levels. If approved, the applicant will be required to draft and submit a security plan to be reviewed and approved by the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department. The security plan would discourage undesirable or illegal activities and would include number of security personnel, hours of security supervision, a guard tower, hand radios, etc. The applicant would also be required to submit a parking and traffic circulation plan in order to minimize vehicular movement and improve traffic flow within the parking area. In addition, the applicant would be required to submit an exterior lighting plan as a well illuminated parking area would discourage undesirable and illegal activities. 6b} As mentioned above, the business ma and expansion may intensify noise levels.1e Toe m t gate plotent al Ino sle levels to a level of insignificance a security plan, parking and traffic circulation plan and fighting plan would all he required. The grading may slightly alter the topography. A grading and drainage plan will be reviewed and applicable permits required. Light and Glare Impact Discussion & Mitigation MeasurP~ 7) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? The project may produce new light and glare as exterior lighting would be required for security purposes in the parking area and around the business. The applicant would be required to submit a detailed lighting plan and the light standards would be erected away from neighboring residential properties and the lights would be installed so as to be directed away from neighboring residences and businesses. Trans ortation/Circulation Discussion & Mitigation Measures 13a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Increasing the size of the restaurant and dance hall may attract additional vehicles and therefore increase vehicular movement. A detailed parking and traffic circulation plan will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department. The plan would include parking lot attendants, delineation of traffic circulation, and assisted parking. 13b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? The project will require parking facilities sufficient for employees and patrons to the business. On weekend evenings, the majority of patrons utilize the parking area to the rear of the business where the dance hall entrance is located. The Lynwood Municipal Code requires one (1) parking stall for each one hundred (100) square feet of building area for restaurants, therefore, if approved, EI Farallon would require 178 parking stalls. The entire Lynwood Plaza contains approximately 682 parking stalls to serve all businesses. 330 parking stalls are located directly behind and in close proximity to the business. The applicant will be required to submit a detailed parking and traffic circulation plan to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff. Components of the plan would be directed and assisted parking, delineation of traffic flow, etc. 14a) Wiil the proposal result in a need for new or altered fire protection? Expanding the existing business would increase the business occupancy load and therefore may increase the need for fire protection. The applicant will be required to submit detailed plans to the Los Angeles County Fire Department for plan check and review to ensure that required fire safety protection measures and included. The entire building will require sprinklers, exits must remain clear and accessible, and fire extinguisher present and operable at the site. 14b) Will the proposal result in a need for new or altered police protection? The business has a poor police incident record. Expanding the business may attract additional patrons and therefore increase the need for police services. The applicant will be required to submit a detailed security plan to be reviewed and approved by the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department. The plan shall include number of security personnel, hours of security coverage, exterior lighting, hand radios and other measures required by the Sheriff to discourage undesirable and illegal activities at the site. In conclusion, a condition will be included that requires the applicant to return to the Planning Commission within six (6) months for a review of the police records and compliance with mandatory conditions of approval. Failure to comply with all conditions of approval may result in revocation proceedings being initiated against the conditional use permit and/or business license and/or referral to the City Prosecutor for legal action against the business owner and property owners. DATE: April 17, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Manager BY: Joseph Y. Wang, P.E., Director of Public Works/Cit En ine Y g ~~ Paul Nguyen, Civil Engineering Associate SUBJECT: California Department of Parks and Recreation The 2000 Park Bond Act (Proposition 12) PURPOSE: To request that the City Council receive and file staff's report relative to the 2000 Park Bond Act. BACKGROUND: Proposition 12 or the Park Bond Act of 2000 (the Bond) is the largest Park Bond in the U.S. history. The Bond provides $2.1 billions to state, county and local agencies under various programs for the acquisition, development, improvement, and restoration of parks and recreation lands and facilities. Approximately $824.5 millions (38%) of the Bond funds will be appropriated exclusively for local parks. There are three separate programs in which funds are appropriated: Per Capita Programs, Competitive Programs and Specified Grants. Per Capita Programs: funds will be distributed to local agencies based on their population. Local agencies can use these funds for eligible projects of their choice. Competitive Programs: Under these programs, local agencies can submit projects of different categories and compete for approval. The categories include urban youth services, zoos and aquariums, urban recreation and cultural centers, riparian/riverine habitat programs and non- motorized trails. The Bonds will pay 70% of the project cost for approved projects. Local agencies are required to provide the 30% of matching funds. Specified Grants: These grants are for specific projects that have specific purposes and regional significance. The City of Lynwood would receive approximately $629,000 of the Bond funds for the Per Capita Programs. Staff has identified certain park improvement projects where these funds can be utilized. Staff will also review and identify projects in the categories of urban youth services, cultural centers, riverine habitat and non-motorized trails, that can be submitted for competitive grants. After these projects have been defined and their budget needs have been estimated, staff will present them to the City Council for its review and approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends for the City Council to receive and file staff's report relative to the 2000 Park Bond Act. Couo1013 Cou01013 ---- AGE.N]~A j~'~~q 1 3 DATE: April 17, 2001 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Manager ~ ~~ BY: Joseph Y. Wang, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Enginee SUBJECT: Proposed Water Line Upgrade Projects PURPOSE: To recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Water Line Upgrade Project and authorizing the project funds appropriation. BACKGROUND: The City's water lines are over 60 years old and in need of upgrades. There are about 90 miles of water lines in the City water system. To keep the system operating efficiently the City has had an on-going water line upgrade project for the last several years. The City's Water Master Plan recommended upgrading several of the water lines throughout the City. The following priority list was developed to coincide with the street improvement projects listed in the CIP Program: • Alameda St. (Butler to Fernwood) • Cedar Ave. (School to Bullis • Santa Fe/State (Lynwood to Euclid) • Carlin Ave. (Waldorf to Atlantic) • Virginia Ave. (School to Bullis) • School St. {Josephine to Cedar) ANALYSIS: The Water Master Plan recommended upgrading the above mentioned lines. These lines will be upgraded to meet the existing water demands of the City and it's residents. In addition the new lines need to be installed before the street improvements are done. Staff estimates the cost to replace the water lines is $1.7 million dollars. Money from the Water Fund can be used to pay for upgrades. The attachment lists the waterlines in order of priority. RECOMMENDATION: To recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE WATER MAIN UPGRADE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO APPROPRIATE AND TRANSFER $1,700,000.00 OF UNAPPROPRIATED WATER FUND TO THE WATER MAIN UPGRADE PROJECT". COU01003 AQFN~ I'~~M L • - -.~.. WATER MAIN UPGRADE PROJECT PRIORITY LIST Alameda Street Butler Fernwood 3000 $400,000.00 Santa FelState Lynwood Euclid 4500 $590,000.00 Carlin Avenue Waldorf Atlantic 1000 $130,000.00 Cedar Avenue School Bullis 1250 $170,000,00 Virginia Avenue School Bullis 1450 $200,000.00 School Street Josephine Cedar 1500 $200,000.00 TOTAL $1,690,000.00 SAYS` x~~s~,: ~~~ ,~ , . ~00 00 Q ~ ~ , ~ , ~ : , G< ~ cip01013 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE WATER MAIN UPGRADE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO APPROPRIATE AND TRANSFER $1,700,000.00 OF UNAPPROPRIATED WATER FUND TO THE WATER MAIN UPGRADE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Water Master Plan recommends the upgrade of certain water lines in the City Water System; and WHEREAS, said water main upgrades need to be implemented to coincide with a number of on-going street improvement projects; and WHEREAS, said upgrades would improve the water system capacity and distribution efficiency, and has been estimated to cost $1,700,000; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to provide Lynwood residents with quality water services; and WHEREAS, staff has identify available funds that can be used for these water main upgrades. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby find, proclaim, order and resolve as follows: Section 1. That the City Council approves the Water Main Upgrade Project. Section 2. That the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to make the following fund appropriation and transfer: FROM Unappropriated Water Fund $1,700,000.00 TO Water Main Upgrade Project $1,700,000.00 Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2001. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II, Mayor City of Lynwood ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAMS III City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Lynwood APPROVED THIS CONTENT: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer COU01003 ~I i ~~ ~' i 11 nj ~~ ~•i '"I ,I ~~' of I ~~~I I I, ,, I~+ ~~. I~ L~'~ +, ,.~ +~I a ih ~+ ~ ~~~ r t"~ ~ I sc V 11 ~ I si ~~ ~, ,. r. se i "1 "_ u;,unALN uATr--: 0-1-);~~ol FREPAIDS AI'-ID VOIDS IJi,ItRAIJI N AI°IllUhl l I (13095 103D96 10309% I0309O ]03099 103100 103101 103102 1(13103 10:7104 10;.110 5 1.03106 103107 103108 103109 103110 Ip3111 103112 103113 103114 ]03115 i0311b 103117 103118 103119 ]03120 103121 10312'' 103123 103124 103125 103126 103127 1D3128 103129 103130 103131 103132 103133 103134 103135 103136 103137 103138 103139 1D3140 (03141 103142 1o31a3 43 44 2%9.00 50 ;i2 1;!0 60 b~)2. 76 ~:SF]. 3U 232.57 77.28 EOO OU IOOO.UO 6U OU 20.70 1051.63 314. b1 2500 00 65600 Bb 3 14 911 10 43224,94 2533.59 110.00 992.00 1121,52 2500.00 24219.73 4000.00 4950.00 2500,00 2624-81 350.00 400.00 2274.79 795.00 129 60 1202.57 160 43 885.60 3600.00 317 00 500,00 e24.o4 1016.05 198.00 100.00 5856.08 1056 24 71,00. 00 l95 25 2soo 00 VENLi01Jlt VENDOR NAME C I T Y of L Y N W O O p W A R RAN T R E: G I S T E R 99999 VERIZON WIRELESS ~~..-- 1254 JOSE Ll1IIi ESPINOZA 096 FED Ex 0118 FIR57 CIi01CE COFFEE 1132 OFFICE DEPOT 254 UNDERGROlND SVC ALERT 99999 ICMA DISIRIOUT[ON CENTER 3356 AT&T WIRF.LE5S [NC. 1(112 110D SYSTEMS 3497 RAINDI]W PR(IMOiII7NS 99999 SApR11JA MOVLTNIE 769 IJORWALK FOWER EQUIPMENT CO. 102 CAL AUDISON 0125 L -. N UN[F"ORMS 4163 SUNRISE COIJ5TRUCTION 4003 pANK C1NE LEASING 335b ATE%T WIRELESS INC. 207 PET7V CASH 246 50 CALIF EDISON COMPANY 201 PACIFIC DELL 99999 DALLOONINGDALES 4129 GETER PR(1GRAM 4204 FASTFRAMES 3402 MARK FULLERTON 183 MELAD ': ASSOCIATES 3430 RESERVE ACCOUNT 3660 JACKSON ?, ASSOCIATES 050 L'EVAN TFILIMAS 3624 VISION SERVICE PLAN 94999 FEDERACIDN D@ CLUDES ZACAT. 42D3 THYRAS CATERING !< CONCE55IUN5 99999 U S pANCORP 99999 A.E E. 243 I_ °< M PRINTING 3012 REDUY AWARDS INC 99999 INTERFJATIDIJAL COSTUMES 105 ANZA RENTS 4283 THYRAS CATL-RINC !, CONCESSIONS 4043 STAR PHOTO UNLIMITED 99999 NATIOIJAL pLACK ADMIN. 99999 MGM GRAND 99999 ARpOR TRAVEL ASSOC. 99999 MONA AMERICA CARD 3484 LOMITA FLORIST b. GIFT SHOP 4101 055 CAC DUILDER5, INC. 243 I_ t M PRINTING 3503 RITA CONSTRVCTION 1125 ELIZAflETH DIxON 404 DRIVE pY AGONY DESCRIPTION FACE: 1 IIJV DATE IN'JOICE AMOUNT TELEPHINE SVC5. U4-17-O1 43 .44 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 04-17-01 279 00 DELIVERY SVCS. 04-17-01 50 . .32 COFFEE Sl1PFLIl.S 04 -1'1-01 120 . b0 OFFICE SUPPLIES O4-17-01 622 .76 UNDERGROUND SVC IJORK 04-17-01 250 .30 COMMUNI7Y INTERNET SVCS. 04-17-O1 232 .57 TELEPHONE SVCS. 04-]7-Dl 77 ,28 RENTAL SVCS, 04-17-D1 500 00 ENTERTAINMENT SVCS. 04-17--01 1000 .00 REFUNU1WTk ACf.T Cl_SU Oq-17-O1 60 .00 OPERATING SUPPLIES D4-t7-O1 20. 78 AUTU PARTS 04-17-01 1051. 63 l1NIFORM RENTAL 04-17-01 314. b1 CONSTRUCTION SVC5. 04-]7-D1 2500. 00 DEOT SVC PYMT ' U3-17-01 b568B, 86 TEL.E PHONE SVC5 Q4-17-01 3 14 REIMDURSEM[NT 04-17-01 . 911 10 LIGHTS ii POWER SVC!i. 04-17-01 . 43224 94 TELEPHONE SVCS. 04-17-01 . 2533 59 OPERATING SUPPLIES 04 17-D1 . 11B 00 CUMMl1NITY SVC Ii 04-1/-O1 qq2 00 PICTl1RE FRAMES U4-17-•0] 1127 52 HOUSING SVCS. 04~-17-OI . 7_500 00 [NSFECTI(1N SVCS. 04-17-01 . 24219. 73 POSTAGE FEES 04-17-01 9000 00 MITIGATION SVC5, 04-17-01 . 4950 DO HUUSING SVC~i U4-17-01 . 2500, (70 VISION PREMIMl1M 04-t7-01 2624 01 DiNhIF.R TICKETS 04-17-01 . 350 00 CATERING SVCS. 04-17-01 . 400 00 OANKCARO SVCS 04-17-01 . 2274 79 REG./FARHADI Oq-17-O1 . 795 00 PRINTING SERVICES O4--17_01 . 129 6(1 PROhIOTIONAL ITEMS 04-]7-01 . 1282 57 PROhI0TI0NAL ITEMS O4-17-01 . 168 43 RENTAL EDVIPMI`NT 04--17--01 . [IDS 60 CATERING SVC5. 04-17-0] , 3000 00 PHDTOGRAPFIY 5ERVICIS D4-17-01 3l7 00 REG. /DYRU Oq-1-1--01 ;00 00 LODGING/D'{RD 04--17-U1 O24 04 AIRLINE TICKET 04-17-01 1016 a5 DANKCARD CHARGES 04-17-01 . 198 00 FLORAL ARRANGEMENT 04-17-01 . 108 00 CONSTRUCTION SVC5. D4--17-01 . 5856 08 PRINTING SERVICES O4-17-Ot . 1056.?4 CONSTRUCTION SVCS. 04-17-0] 7bOD 00 REIMDURSEMENT 04-17-OT 195.25 COMMUNITY SVCS. 04-17-01 2500.00 llyd~I~niII UAIL_ 04- 17 (11 C I T Y of L V N W O O D W A H R A N T R E G I S T E R PA GE: 2 I'HEI'AIUS AND VCIIDS 41AHRAIJIII AI'IOUNT VLN[iURq VENUOR IJAME __ _ ~_ DESCRIPTION , INS DATE IN'JOICE AMOUNT 10:3144 650 .00 99999 NFOPA ~ ~ ~ 1U3145 L6H .96 L107 DICK'S LOCK f~ KEy REG/HOWARll , 04-17'01 650 - .00 103146 15;37 .90 , ;1019 RECOGNIT[pN INC LOCK •- KF.Y SVGS. 04-17-01 668 .98 103147 :149 .90 . 4201 ALLIAPJT fOOU SERVICE PROMOTIONAL I1EM5 04--17-01 15'37 .90 10314H T6 . 26 4079 A5TR0 I:AMUIV SUPPLIES CATERING SVCS O4-17--01 349 90 103149 295 .90 B90 PAGECp COPIER MAINTENANCE [14-17-01 72.6. 2h !03!50 191 .86 666 TAJ OFFICE SUPPLY PAGER SVCS. 04-17-D1 295. 90 103151 040 .57 601 WEST CUAST DUOR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 04-17-01 191. 66 10315 1904 q0 ~ . 940 JAY'S CATERING DUES Y SU6CRIPTILIN 04-17-01 840, 57 1D'3153 27 .05 436 THE MAG1C RASE CATERING SVCS. 04-17-01 1407 40 10:3154 9)3 -, 1~ 2 ., _U~ PAGEANIItI' PROUIICTIONS FLORAL ARRANGEMENT 04--17-01 27. 05 103155 160. 46 393 PETTY CASH/CM RENTAL SVCS. 04-17-U1 933. 12 103156 325. 00 99999 MR HENRY CHARLES JOHNSON 04-17-01 160. 46 103157 191. 25 343 PETTY CASH/CM ENTERTAINMENT SVCS. 04-17-01 325. 00 10315H 2002, 63 1608 PATTY'S TROPHY REIM6UR5t:MENT 04-17-O1 191. 25 ]03159 2160, 41 701 FRANK SCEIN NUV1_LTIES pPF.RATIPIG SI/PPl_IES O4-17-01 2D02. 63 103160 1G53. 00 1271 AMETRON AMERICAFJ ELECTROIJIC OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17 O1 ? _.160. 41 103161 350, DD 36 JOHN SOLTIS RENTAL SVCS. O4--17-01 1053. 00 ]03162 1360. U0 99999 CA6LE E~ WIRELESS KARATE INSTRUCTOR 04-17-D1 350. DO 103163 15. 00 99999 CAPIO SPRIT SACRAMENTO REGCHOWAFIOSVCS. 04-17-01 1360, 00 ]03164 245. OD 99999 CAPIO 04-17-01 15, 00 103165 1000. 00 ;1609 EDGARDp BEI_MORE JUN ADO REG./HOIJARD EIJTERTA[N11L"NT SVCS 04-17-01 245. 00 103166 SOOU OD 3503 R I TA C UN ;1'F+UCT I CIN . U CS 04 -17-01 16D0. 00 103167 277. 60 99999 CALIFORNIA OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC DFFICE SUPPLIES 04 17 01 'OUD 00 103166 2286. 36 1404 PAINTERS WAREIi0U5E OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 277. 66 103169 560. 00 3716 DAVID YOUNG CON,,ULTING SVCS 04-17-01 226h 36 103170 16602. 3.l 970 DEI-TA DEIJTAI- . DENTAL PREMIMUf1 04-17-01 560. DO 103171 96374. 2E 1115 P E.R.S.-CIEALTH PFR5 MEDICAL 04--17-p1 181,02. 33 103172 !021, 55 99999 EUD D4-17-01 90374. 2p 103173 4950. 00 3666 JACKSpN !~ ASSOCIATES UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 04-17-OL 1021, 55 103174 5000. 00 v, 366E JACNSUN ASSOCIATES MITIGATION SVCS. REPORTING SVCS 04-17-01 4950. 00 103175 5505. 67 191 WAVE COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER . ADVERTISING SVCS O4-17-01 5000. 00 103176 312694. 2G 205 PAYROLL FUFJD PAYROLL FUND 3731 04-17-OL 5505. 67 ]03177 2320 B6 -; ,- .636 .,TRATECY 7 CORP. 11A[1JTENANCE AGREEMENT 04-17-01 312694. ..0 103252 0. 00 99999 1iP01LED SPOILED 04-17-O1 2320 H8 103253 0. 00 99999 SPOILED 5P OILED 04-iT-01 O p0 103254 O. DO 99999 SPOILED SPOILFp 04-17-01 0. 00 103255 0. 00 99999 SPOILED SPOILED 04-17-01 O. OU 103256 0 00 99949 SPOILED SPOILED 04-17-01 0. 00 103257 0 00 99999 SPOILED SPO R ED 04-17-01 0. 00 _ 04-11-01 0. 00 TOTAL PREPAI'S 666709.15 TOTAL V0I05: 0 OU TOTAL: h667139 15 i _ '"~ ~- ~1 U~l1t141hJ1 I)AIL lia- 17-~ cl~rv ~~~ O1 W LYlvwtion A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PA r,E 3 ~ I•l~',ItRAldlk P,MOUNT VENDORq VENDOR Mist•lE DESCRTPTION INV DATE i IIJ10iCE AMOUNT ' lU;iliU 10317`) 142 ' 1;J ;157] AQATES ~-_-- -OP ERATINO SUPPLIES O4-17-01 142 l3 I ; 1031 00 1 .` ' ' .00 3253 HECTOR AQARCA PLANNING C.OMh1. 3/13 04-17-01 25 00 I . 103101 L T .19 1289 AQC HARDWARE OPERATING 5UPNLIES O4-17-01 . 272 19 '~I 10310:' 91 84 445 ACADEMY PO01_S OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 47 84 ~ '' lOJ1H 3 6305 50 4232 ACCENET [NC. COh1Pl1TER SVCS. Oa-17-01 . 6385 50 j . 1031H4 !lq 'iD 602 ADT SECURITY SERVICES ALARM SVCS. Oq-t'/-O1 . 174 50 103105 296? 9y 001 ADT SECl1RI7Y SERVICE INC. PROGRAM 5VC5. Oa 17-01 . ?92 99 103106 67 ,64 99999 ALDRICH SPIITH WTR REFUND ACCT/CLSD 04-17-01 67 64 " 103187 253 .00 3;27 ALFA CAROURETUR6 AUTO PARTS 04-17-01 . 253 00 ~ '~~I 103188 03 1236 .00 82 99999 ALICIA GARC[A PARKING REFUND 04-17-01 . 83, 00 10;7109 . 420 ALL AMFRiCAN HOME CENTER OPERATING SVPPLIE5 Oa--17-01 1236 82 '° 103190 F!5 ,00 3310 KATHERINE L. AMEY C,OPIMUNITY COMM 3/21 Oq-17-01 . 25 00 I 103191 1UD OD 9y997 ANDHES PIARvlUE2 ~. DENTAL REIMDUR~EMEI'JT Oa 17-01 . 100 U0 I ~ 103192 101 .00 99999 ANDREW MARTINEZ PARKING/REFUND Oq~-17-01 . 101 00 „ ;~i 103193 100. 00 99999 ANTONIO PEREZ DENTAL REIMQURSEMENT Oq-17-UI . 100 00 • 103194 155. 1397 00 52 99499 APA 0159 AQUA METRIC SAL E5 CO MEh1QER5HIP DUES - . 0 j:~ 103145 Il9 2D . 40R6 ARCH HYDRANT METERS O4 17 Ot 1397. 5 :.~ 103196 ;1;38. 21 760 ARGO ELECTRIC SUPPLY C0 PAGER SVCS 17PERATINC SVPF'LIES 04--17-OL 119. 28 1(73197 16. 36 99999 AT?~ T DROADDAND CAOLE 5VC5 U4-17-01 :330. 21 ~ ~ 103190 981. 3t 4272 AUTOMATED DINDING -< MA1L[NG . PUDLIC NOTICES 04-17-01 04-17-01 16, 36 I 103199 25. 00 99999 AVIS RENT A CAR REFUND/PARKING pa-17-01 901. 31 :.• 103200 25. 00 3210 VETA OANKS CDQG COMM q/4 04-..17.01 25 DO ~ 103201 25 OU ;iSUU ,IAMINA DARNE5 F'L.ANNING CCIMM 3/13 04-11-01 2; 00 ~, 103202 103203 1'5. 0(1 20 YOLANUA DAYS CCIMMUNI7Y COPIM 3/21 04-17 D1 25. 2' OU 00 103204 187. 00 515 DDR SURVEYING PAINT SUPPLIES 04-17-01 _ 187 00 ~ 103205 1320. 61 03 DEST ACCESS SYSTEMS 1 LOCK INSTALLATION SVCS. 04-17-01 , 1328 61 „ 103206 97l 02 780 DISHOP CO. UPERATING SUPPLIES 04-IJ-01 . 971 02 " If)3207 `,29. 63 080 DL-UE OIAMOPJO MATERIALS OPERATING SUPPLIES Oq-17-01 . 529 63 ~. 10320[3 16:31 63 956 UUIE D[AMOfJU MAIERIAI-S DI'F.HATLNG SUPPLIES O4-17-01 . 1631 63 „i • 103209 935, l9 1105 DREEZER EUUIP. .. SIJPf'LY IPERATING SVPPLIE5 Da-17-U1 . 935 19 ~ j 1032]0 25. 00 3477 JUAN DRIGHT CDDG COMM 4/5 04-17-01 . 25 U0 ... „j 103211 113. b9 3513 DUDDS HARDWARD OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 113 64 ~ 103212 779, 55 4290 DURGES5 ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL SVCS. 04-17-01 . 779 55 ~, 103213 4590. 27 936 CARL WARREFJ `~ C0 LIADILITY CLAIMS O4-17-01 . 4590 ?7 ' 1UO OU 99979 CAROLINA UE JE5L15 DENIAL RF:IMDUftSEMENT 04-17-O1 . 100 00 • ~ l 103214 103215 425. 00 99999 CCCA REG./G[VL"NS p4~17-01 . 425 U(I •n ~ 103216 1756. 00 47 CENTRAL. DASIN MUNICIPAL WATER MONITORING PROGRAM 04-]7-01 1756 00 ,.I 200 00 1218 CHICAGO T17LE COMPANY TITLE REPORTS 04-17-D1 . 200 U0 103217 2156. 45 996 CITY OF INGLEWOOD PROCESSING FEES O4-17-01 . 2156 45 ae !03218 25. 00 99999 CLAVOIA SAhJpOVAL PARKING/REFUND 04--17-01 . 25 00 103219 623 50 53 CLINICAL LAD OF SAN DERN WATER 5AMPL.INC O4-t1-UI a, 103220 59 07 99999 COASTAL TRAINING TECHNOLG[E5 OPERATING GiUPPLIES p4 11-01 623 50 ,al 103221 2675. 00 1499 COLOR KING AVTD DODY REPAIR SVCS 59. 01 103222 50503. 14 57 COMMUTER DUS LINES . TROLLEY SVCS 09-17-01 2675. UD ~~~ 103223 34. 47 59 COMPTON DLUEPflINT b. SUPPLY . DLUEPRINT SVCS 04-17-O1 04-17-01 50503 14 s: (03224 4693. 17 -698 COUNTY OF L. A. ANIMAL CONTROL . HOUSING SVCS. 04-17-01 34. 4693 47 17 s, 103225 540386. 50 1032 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS. 04-17-01 . 540386 50 `. 103226 2267. 26 742 DANGELO CO. OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 2267.26 ~ ~;`~ ~~~ - -. C I T Y uF L Y N W U U D ~d nli l+Ald( IiA il_, (i4- 1/- OL W A R R A IJ T R E G I S T E R ~i . PA GE: 4 l,~ i ~~ Wi+RFiAIV7l1 AhIUl1NT VCNUORII VENDOR NAME DESf,P.IPTION INV DATE IPIVOICE AMOUNT 1 1113;'27 331:17 . 75 1179 DAI'EEI7 RDSENDLIT LLGAL FEES ~--- - 04 1'•-U1 3387 75 i. 10'3228 160 .00 939 DATA PLUS CDMMUNICATIOIJ5~ INC. PHONE SVC5. 04-17-01 160 00 103«9 !iD .OD 3511 DATAOUICK COMPUTER SVC5. 04--17-01 50 . 00 I~~ ~ 10:3230 9573 ,52 357 UAVE RANG ASSOCIATES, INC OPERATING SVPPLIES 04-17-01 9573 . 52 ~i ~"I lU3E.31 103'.32 462 1J Oi> 95 3346 49999 DDAS IIE SCHELL APPRAISAL. SVC5. D4-17-01 462 . .00 ~ ~ REFUND/W1R ACCT CL D D4 17-U1 i3 95 ~ 103233 3430 .00 543 UEE-MAR, 1NC TEMPfJRARY SVC5. 04-1%-01 3430 . OD 103234 5'6 .80 220 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SVGS WATER SYSTEMS FEE 04-17-01 526 B0 ~ ' 103235 184 .40 1107 DICK'S LUCK ?~ KEV LOCK IN5TALLA'fION 04-17-01 184 . 40 ~~ ~ 103236 1311 .39 1164 DISCOUNT RADIATOR SERVICE AUTO PARTS 04-17-01 1311 . 38 ~ l 103237 1700 .00 4022 DMR TEAM ~ CDN,~ULTIMG SVGS. 04-17-01 170D . 00 v 1D3238 ' 4D . 00 99999 UON OLSUN DENTAL REIMIURSEMENT Ctq-17-01 q0 00 , 10323 1 50 .00 99999 DORDTHV 51DOELL D[NTAI_ REIMRUH5EMENT 04-t7-DI SD . 00 ~ ~ 103240 25 .00 73 DONALD DOVE PLANNING COMM. 3/13 04-17-01 25 00 ~ ' 103241 ' 1250. 00 404 DRIVE RY AGONY COMMUNITY SVGS. 04-17-01 1250 . 00 .• 103e g2 42902 19 4253 EC CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION SVGS. 04-17-D1 42902 . 19 103243 50. 00 99999 EDWIN AYALA DENTAL RF:IM9URSEMEN7 04~-1 7-01 . 50 00 1(13249 186. 7H 3826 ELIZADETIi DIXON REIMDURSEMENT . Dq-17-01 186 . 78 ~~ 10;.1245 103246 1662 DU 4162 ENVIRONMENTAL. DYNAMIf:S HAZARDl7U5 WA57E CI.I-AN-UP 0q~ 17-Oi 1662. . DO ~ 1D3247 40. 00 99999 ERNEST HINOJOS DENTAL REIMBURSEMENT 04-17-01 40. 00 ~ 40. 50 99999 ERNESTINE JOHNSON REFUND/PERMIT FEE 04-17-01 40 50 ,. ~ 103248 345. 60 1254 JOSE LUIS ESPINDZA PHOTOGRAPHY 5ERVICI_S O4-17-01 . 345 60 ~, ~ 1032'19 30. 00 99979 EZEUDU ODTNNA REFUND/PARKING , 0 00 ~ ~ 103250 1120. 13 812 FAIR HCIUEING FOUNUATIUN COMMUNITY SVC5, Oq-17-O1 8. it^ I 103251 251. 00 896 FED EX DELIVERY SVC5. U4-17-D1 251 00 ,~ 103258 25. 00 91 ANN A. FIELDS COMMUNITY CDMM 3/21 04-17-01 . 25 00 ',i 103259 103260 316. 37 54 70 0118 898 FIRST CFIOICE COFFEE FI COFFEE SVPPLIES 04-11-01 . 3!6. 54 , RST COURIER SERVICE DELIVERY SVC5. 04-17-01 37 70 1~ 103261 306. DO 3534 FORD ELECTROIJICS OPERATING SIIPPL.IFS O4-17-01 . 306 00 , 103262 99 OU 99999 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS REG./E WILLIAMS D4-17_(t1 . yq OO ~ 103203 215. 00 35 1) '- G AUTO tJPHDLSTERY AIITU PARTS 0q ~17--01 2 15 00 ~ 103264 82. 93 3579 GCR PARAMOl1NT TRUCK TIRE TIRE SVGS. 04-17-01 82 93 ~ 103265 198. 00 4209 GCS WESTERN POWER ! EDUIP REPAIR SVC5. 04-17-01 198 00 !03266 38 56 99999 GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE WTR REFUNO ACCT/CLSD 04-17-01 . 38 56 103267 942. 91 4030 GEORGE CH['/ROLET AUTD PARTS O4-17-01 . 942 91 ,~I 103268 3688. 14 3778 GETRDNICS MAINTENANCE AGRFFMIENi U4 I'-O1 . 3688 14 103259 25. 00 109 NANCY GILPT:N PERSONNEL. COMM. 3/15 D4-17-01 . 2~, (lD ~, 103270 13. 99 1294 GOLDEN WEST PIPE E, SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17-01 13 99 ,., 1D3271 244, 58 1272 GRAINGER OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 244 58 ., I 103272 10. 00 99999 GRANT TAYLOR PLANNING LUNCHEON 04-t7-O1 . 10 UO . ' 103273 25. OD 3325 JAMES GREEIN f.DDG CDMM 4/4 04-17-p1 . 25 00 , 103274 345. 32 965 GST,lP1C. /11ICR0 CITY PRINTER 1)4-17-01 . 345 32 ,.y 103275 148 2H 4031 GUHO OVILDING MATERIALS OPERATING SUPPLIES 04 17-01 . 14H 2H ~4 103276 25. 00 3405 JOANETTE GUTIERREZ CDDG CDMM 4/4 04-17-01 25 00 x, 103277 33. 75 99999 H R BUFFINGTON WTR REFUND ACCT/CLSO 04-17-01 . 33 75 ,~ !03278 34. 94 99999 H R DIRECT OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17-01 . 34 94 sa 103279 31 B. 80 3369 HANSON AGGREGATES WEST, INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17--01 . , „I 10328D 13954. 69 562 HARRINGTUN DECORATING OPERATING SUPPLIES 04 17 0l 318 (;)954 80 69 „I ( ,, 103281 90. 00 99999 HERLINDA GAMDOA DENTAL REIMDURSEMENT Oq-17-O1 90. 00 l ea ~~i C [ 1 Y of l_YNWOOU W,11+1+AlJf UA7L. G4~17 pl W A H k A N T R E G 1 5 T E R PAGF.~ 5 ~~ 41ARRAPITII AhI0l1fIT VLNDORH VErJDDR NAhIE ~ _ DESCRIPTION IIJV GATE IN':'OICE AMOUNT ~'•I 1O3~'fl.' 7C, 60 1372 Hl-WAY iAFETY, INC_ OPERATING 5l1PPLIF.S 04-17-01 75 60 i, 1(7328:3 981. 24 4025 HILLYARD OPERATING SUPPLIES D4-17-01 981 24 ~ 1U3204 1088, 8:3 913 HILLYARD OPERATING 5UPPl_IES 04-17-01 . 1088 83 IU3285 518. 56 9y999 HILTON HOTEL r L.pOGIh'G/GIVENS 04-17-01 . 598 56 1032Db 142h. 5C1 3657 HINDERI.ITER, de L.1FlMA5 ASSOC. SAI,F.S TA% ADDITORS ~. 04-17-01 1426 SD ~J 103287 551. 05 4039 fJOME DEPOT OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-L7-Ol . 557 05 ~:~ ' 103280 6350. 61 526 HDNEYWEI_l_ IhlC REPAIR SVCS. U4-17-O1 , 635P 61 ~' ~ ~ 103289 7:15. 15 99999 HYATT REGENCY LODGING/HOOPER D4-17-01 _ 735 15 ~~ ~ 103290 495. 00 99994 IIMC REG./HOOPER D4-17--01 , 495 00 ~~ I• I 103291 10 98'3. 66 3706 INFO5END~ INC. WATER/PIVNICIPAL Dll_LS 04-17-01 . 9283 66 ' 3292 67909 7;1 3842 JOHN DEEkE CO ,RAI_F.IGtI IJC VEHICLE REPLACEML-NT 04-17-01 , 67989 73 u l 103293 1524. 76 940 JAY'S CFl1EkING CATF..RINC SVCS. 04-17-O1 . 1524 76 ni 103294 72;1. 17 33~i9 JERRY'S SIGNS '~ DESIGN BANNERS O4-17-01 . 723 17 , 103295 31. 10 49999 JESUS GONZALEZ WTR REFUND ACCT CLSO D4-17-01 . 31 10 103296 257. 60 3439 JODS AVAILADLE INC. ADVERTISING SVCS. 04-17-01 . 2 57 60 ~ 103297 1770. 15 4250 JOHN HILL << AS5pCIATES PROFESSIpNAL SVCS. 04-17-01 . 1770 15 1(13298 50. OD 9y999 JOHN SLEVKOFF DENTAL REIMDURSEMENT 04-17-01 . 50 00 107299 25 00 3300 RUDERT JOHN5TON PERSONNEL COMM. 3/15 D'1--17-D1 , 25 U0 :+ ~ 103300 SU 00 99999 JOHONNA HDWARp DENTAL flF.IMDURSEMEPIT 04-17-01 . 50 OU :• I 103301 1776, 11 136 JONES LUMDER OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 1776 i1 :r~ 103302 189. 86 3619 JONES LUMDER OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 189 86 •, 103303 25. OD 99999 JURGE ARROYO REFUND/PARKING 04-17-01 . 25 00 ~~ ~ 103304 117 40. 00 99999 JORGE C01_L DENTAL REIMDURSEMEI.IT 04-17-01 . 40 00 ••~ l 3305 130. 00 99999 JORGE SOLTFRO DENTAL REIMDURSEMENT (14-17-01 . 130 00 ai 103306 192. 0(1 99999 ,.105E ROllkIGI1E1 PARKING/P,[FUND D4-17-01 . 192 OU ,~ 103307 50. 00 99999 JOSEPH WANG DENTAL REIMDURSEMENT 04-17-01 . 50 00 v~ ~ !03308 1879. 20 3816 JTD SUPPLY CD. UPERATINU SUPPLIES 04-17-D1 . 1879 20 I I 103309 50. 00 49999 KATHY DEAL DENTAL RE[MDUftSEMEPIT 04-17-01 . 50 00 ~+ 103310 3. 36 140 I(EY5TONE FORD A11T0 PARTS 04 17-01 . 3 36 ,I 1(7;7311 30 00 UU1 Il[NG FENf,E FENCE INSTALLATION 04°11-01 . 30 UO •.,i ~ ' 103312 585. 0(1 3;318 KING'S DIESEL SFRVICE~ [NC ItEPA3R 5VC5. 04-17-D1 . SO5 00 „ l 103313 3650. 00 4274 K w. K SYSTEMS, INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 3650 00 Su ~ 103314 10 1D93. 87 0125 L ?, N UNIFORMS I1NIFORM P.ENTALS 04-17-01 , 1093. 87 ~,, I 3315 138. 24 4015 L !< M PRINTING CO. PRINTING SERVICES O4-17-01 138 24 +~~ 103316 120. 20 1306 I_ A. COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY DISTRICT FlTTORM[Y FEF5 04-17-01 . 120 20 u !03317 141. 11 4112 L A. COUNTY OF Pl1DLIC WOkKS IhAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 04-~17-01 . 141 11 103318 I82U 17 4279 I_APIDUS COfJSULTING CONfiIJI_TING SVCS. 04-17-01 . 1820 17 „ 103319 1049, 47 891 f,OUNTY OF L. A. SHERIFF'S DEPT. LAW ENFORCEMENT 5VC5. 04-17-01 . 1049 47 ~, ~ 103320 <^5. 00 1062 GEORGE LEWIS PERSONNEL COMM. 3/i5 04-17-01 25 00 ,, l 103321 1151. 61 3902 LEXlS PUDLI5HING DUES & SUDSCRIPTION U4-17-DI . ILSI bI +o 103322 404. 00 4000 1_IEDERT f,A55IDY LEGAL. SVCS, 04-17-O1 , 404 00 ~, 103323 25. 00 153 ARNOLD LITKE PERSONNEL. COMM. 3/I'.i 04-17-01 . 25 UO +n 103324 25 00 2097 JOSEPHINE LITTLEJDHN PERSONNEL COMM.3/IS 04-17-01 25 00 +y 103325 512. 95 1238 LANG DEACH UNIFORM UNIFORM RENTALS O4-17-01 512 95 ,0 103326 219. 00 99999 LORMAN EDUCATION SVCS. REG./MAY TAN Oq-17-01 . 219 00 ,~ ~ 103327 7979. 00 80 LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN DUS VOUCHERS 04-17-01 . 7979 00 I ,a 103328 143. 17 1792 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR ASSESSOR'S MAPS O4-17-01 . 143 17 „ 103329 799 85 164 LYNGATE PRINTING CO. PRINTING SERVICES 04-17-01 . 779 85 h. 103330 66 55 170 LYNWOOll RENTAL CENTER RENTAL SVCS. 04-17-D1 66. 55 IIAItHAIJF UAfI i)•T- 1i~ C I 1 Y iif 01 LYN41000 I' WARRANT REG I STFR PA GE: 6 (^~ WAIif2A147q At1C1l1NT VENDORN VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION iNV DATE ihJVO1CE AMOUNT 'I 1'JJ331 103332 ,! .OD '3489 ALLAN MACIEL ~ PLANNING COMM. 3/13 04-17-01 25 00 ~~~ 103333 1205 .00 1540 MAIN STREET TOURS TRANSPORTATION SVGS. 09-17-01 1205 . 00 • 70;3334 329 ,Sb 4027 MANAGED HEALTH NETWDRK EMPLOYEE A55ISIS7ANCE 04-17-01 329 , 56 10 1335 ;!5 . OD :3355 pR. CARLUS MANLAPAZ PLANNING COMM. 3/1;3 04-17-01 25 . 00 '~ , 103336 SZ 3D 999'79 t1ARC0 GALVEZ WTR REFUND ACCT CLSD 04-17-Ut 5? . 38 ' 10333/ ;0 U(1 99994 t1AR[D CORTES REFUNUADLE DEPOSIT 04--17-01 50 . 00 ", 103338 24/ .50 12 D5 h1ARK IV CHARTER LINES TRANSPORTATION SVGS. D4-17-O1 247 . 50 103339 BU .OU 99994 MAY L TAN DENTAL REIMDUR5EMEIJT 04-17-01 . 80 00 ' 4500 .00 342b MISSION MANAGEMENT COMPUTER 5Vf,S. 04-17-01 , 9500 00 ~i 103340 1b84 .80 4146 MITCHELL PER50NhJEL 5VC TEMPORARY SVGS. 04-17-01 . 1h84 B0 ~" iD3341 1 2,331, 27 82 MITY-CITE, INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17-01 . 233t ~7 ' 0.7342 1210 21 827 M !~. M A11T0 FARTS AUTO PARTS O4-17-01 . 1278 21 " ~ ~ 103343 103344 500 Q0 463 MMI MANAGEMENT SY5TE11 f,UMPl1TER SVGS. 04-17-01 , 500 00 . :~~ 103345 475. 00 482 MONIES GARDEN SERVICES RESIDENTIAL CLEAN-lJP 04-17-01 , 475 D0 ~~ 103346 254. 14 3442 MYERS TIRE SVPPLY CO TIRE SVGS. 04-17-01 . 254 14 103347 1168. 60 190 NAP'S Alll'0 REPAIR AUTO REPAIR SVGS. 04-17-01 . 1168 b0 1033 1540, 0(i 4D47 NATIONWIDE ENVIRCIMENTAI_ SERVIC DUS STOP CLEANING '.iVCS. 04-17-01 . 1540 00 :. 411 875 OU 143 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC. EMERGENCY PIPE CLEANING 04-t7-01 . 875 00 :+ 103349 1434; 94 973 NATIONWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL SVGS 51REET SWEEPING SVI:S, U4-17-0t . 14342 94 ]03350 45. 00 99499 NAVARRtl'S TOWING TOWING SVGS . :~~ ~ 103351 48. 00 44999 NELSON VILLALTA . PARKING/RE:FUND D4-17-01 45. 00 103352 25 OU 197 BARDARA NEWTON COMMIUNITY GOMM 3/21 04-17-01 04-17-01 48. 00 ~ 103353 72 L lU 3553 NEXTEI. COMMUNICATION PHONIE SVGS 25. 00 „~~ 10;3354 97D0 00 4019 NORRIS RCP14F. . CONSULTING SVGS 04-17-01 721. 10 'o 103355 ]39. 16 769 NORWAI_K POWER EOUIPM[N7 CU. . OPERATING SUPPLIES 04 17 01 04-17-D1 9780. 00 ~~ 103356 195. OG 4230 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 5VC5 EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL 04-17-01 ]39 l6 ~. I 103357 425. 58 3834 CIFFICE UEPUT OFFICE Sl1pPLIES O4-17-01 195. 42 5 00 58 ~~ u ]03358 103354 L77. 03 126 OFFICE t1AX OFFICE SUPPLIES O4-17-01 . 177 03 l 103360 1374 72 1132 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES O4-17-01 , 1374 72 ~ 500. b4 ;3747 ORANGE COl!hJl'Y RT:G[STER ADVERTISING 5VC5. U4-17--01 . 500 b4 , 103361 124. b0 h76 ORVAC FI_LCTR(7NlCa (IF'ERATING SUPPLIES 04-1'/-O1 . ~ ~ 1033b2 181, 55 4135 O5UNA A11T0 GLASS VEHICLE GLA55 REPAIR 04-17-D1 lr_4. 181 60 55 ~, 103363 18864. b2 986 P. E. R. S. PERS RETIREMENT 3/17 04-17-01 . 18864 b2 ~• ~ 1033b4 189. 94 893 PAGEANTRI' PROPS '< DEr,OR PROMIOTIOPJAL ITEMS 04--17-Ot . 184 i~~l 103365 78. 44 97ri pAGENET OF ORAPJGF. COl1NTY PAGER SVGS. 04-]7-01 . q4 103366 946 GH 1404 PAINTEkS IJAREHOUSE F'A1NT SUPPLIES 04-17-U1 7g, q4 u 1D3367 556. 57 657 F'APERDIRLCT~ INC. OPERATING SUPI'l_IES 04-17-01 946, 556 U8 r 103368 391. 38 407 PARK WATER COMPANY MEDIAN IRRIGATION .,7 a I L03369 25. 00 3315 RITA PATEL PLANNING COMM. 3/13 04-17-01 3 ., 103370 99. 00 99999 PEACHTREE DUSINESS PRODUCTS OPERATING SUPPLIES Q4-17-Ot 25. 00 I 103371 150. 00 99999 PEDRO OUINTANILLA DENTAL REJMDURSEMEFJT 04.17-0] 94. 00 ~ 1033?2 627 QU 479 PENHAI_L CDt1PANY OPERATING SlPPLIES 04-17-01 150. 00 ^` ~ 103373 622. 08 20b p[RVO PAINT COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 627. 622 00 w 103374 242. 47 207 PETTY-CASH REIMDUR5EMENT . 08 so 103375 300. 00 393 PETTY CASH/CM REIMDURSEMENT 09-17-01 292. 47 si 103376 4275.00 0258 PICKARD ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURAL SVGS. 04-17-01 04-17-01 300. 4 00 .: 103377 1946. 60 4108 PIONEER AMERICAS INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17-0] 275. 00 u ]03378 2022. OR 371 PITNEY DOWE5 PDSTAGE FEES 09-17-01 19gb 60 ..~ 103379 421. 15 3857 PDSITIVE PROMOTIONS OPERATING SUPPLIES 2022. D8 „I 04--17-D1 421. 15 UAltl:(,Idl IiAll. C~1~17 Ol ~~~ IJrARRAPITIt AMgUPIT VENDORq ~lENDOR NAME C ['f Y of LYNWgOD W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R DESCRIPTION PAGE. 7 IIJV DATE INVOICE AMOVNT IU3;)BO 103381 i 1:166 00 4130 F'OSIiIV[ IIhAGE COMMUNITY 5VCS. 04-17-01 1366 00 103382 3001 4148 .80 OD 261 PRE55 TELEGRAM ' ADVERTISING SVCS. 04-17-01 3801 . .80 1113383 . 240 00 4131 f RUJECT IMPACT 49999 PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITY 5VCS. OM1-17-01 4148 .00 103384 . 153?_0.00 DUSINES5 PUDLIC. 3990 PROJECT IMPACT DUES !. SVDCRIPTION 04-17-01 240 .00 10338; 1573 .7(1 ID84 QUALITY AUiI] COMMUNITY SVCS. 04-17-01 15320 .00 10;3386 7:J 7 .611 4273 QUEEN DEACH PRINTING AUTO PARTS PRINTING SERVICES 04-17-01 1573 .70 103387 23 .00 99999 RAFAEL DOMINGUEZ PARI(ING/REFUND O4--17-01 737 .60 103388 1036 .49 4248 RAINDOW PROGRAM COMMUNITY SVCS 2 103389 40 . OD 99999 RAMON GAL]NDO . U4-17-01 1036. 49 103390 606 DO 221 RAPID PUDL ISIJING DENTAL REIMUURSEMENT 04--17-01 40. 00 1D3391 '~'5 00 . 3257 WILLARU li REEU ADVERTTSING 5VCS. U4-17-01 606. 00 103392 ;170 ,54 . 225 RENTERIA AUTU PARTS PLANNING CgMM. 3/13 04-17-01 25. 00 1D3393 888 .71 1226 RICHARDS~ WATSON !. GERSHON AUTO PARTS LEGAL SVCS O4-17-01 378. 54 103394 35 . b1 99999 RICKY MARTINEZ . WTR REFUND ACCT CLSD 04-17-01 04-17-01 888. 71 103395 103396 299 .10 107 RDDERT50N'S OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17-01 35. 299 61 10 103397 27 OD 99999 RUDEN JARAM[I_LD REFUND/SENIOR TRIP 04-'17-01 . 2 9 00 103398 1467 1l 1230 5 •'~ J SUPPLY f.0. r J11PPLIES A D4-17-O1 . 146 11 1(13399 467 .76 232 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION AUTO PAHTS U4 17-O1 ,. 46 76 103400 1555, 20 745 SAFEWAY SIGN CO. OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 ,. 1555 20 1D 1888. 00 4193 SATURN SYSTEMS INC. INSTALLATION 5VCS. 04-17-01 . 1888 00 3401 L03402 338. 17 4064 5EMPRA ENERGY REPAIR SVCS. 04-17-01 . 338 17 103403 51;. 28 926 SHF.RWIN-WII_LIAMS C0 OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 515 28 1034D4 146. 26 4277 SIERRA 5PRiNi;S RENTAL 5VCS, U4-17-01 . 146 26 103405 :4. 87 99999 SILVItJO TORRE5 41TR REFUND ACCT CLSD 04-17-0( . 24 87 103406 82, 40 10 SONITROL OF LONG DEACH ALARM 5VCS. 04-17-01 . 0~ q0 103407 136. 85 446 SOUTH GATE CAMERA CAMERA SUPPLIES 04-17-01 136 85 1034D8 1292. 93 249 SOUTHGATE WHOLESALE ELECTRIC OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 1292 93 103409 176 08 3549 SPARKLETTS WATER SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 176 08 103410 825. 00 42h SF, FRANCIS hIED1CAL CENTER COMMUNITY SVCS. 04- V-O1 . 825 00 103411 ll6 61 1301 STAPLES OFFICE 4lFlREHUVSE OFFICE SUPPLIES 04-17-D1 . 116 61 284. 00 4043 STAR PHOTO UNLIMITED PIOTOGRAPHY SERVICES O4-17-p1 . 289 U0 103412 25. 40 99999 STATE OF CALIFgRNIA DEPARTMENT ADC REPORT 04-17-01 . 25 00 103413 50. 00 99499 STEVE VILLA5ENOR DENTAL REIMDURSEMENT 04-17-01 . 50 00 103414 218, 16 666 TAJ OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES Oq-17-01 . 2185 16 103415 40. 00 99999 TAMU 1_EDDETTER DENTAL REIMDURSEMENT U4-17-U1 . 40 00 103416 4b 00 99999 TED'S SERVICE COMPAN'! REPAIR SVCS. 04-17-O1 , 96 00 103417 1034k8 737. 24 264 TElIACO~ INC. GASOLINE SVCS. Oq-17-01 . 737 24 277. 82 3494 THE JANFtOVICH COMPANY PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 04-17-01 . 277 82 103419 2101. 54 3931 THE LIGHTHDVSE AUTO PARTS D4-17-01 . 2101 54 103420 3337. 50 99999 THE COMPVTER CLINIC CORP. PRINTER PURCHASE 04-17-01 . 3337 50 103421 60 00 436 THE MAGIC ROSE FLORAL 5VCS. 04-17-pi . 60 00 103422 9l. OS 99999 THE SINGLETON COMPANY SET-UP FEES O4-17-01 . 91 06 103423 274. 80 4I78 THE ORANGE CD. REGISTER ADVERTISING SVCS. 04-17-01 . 274 80 103424 432. 00 265 DILL THOMAS PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES Oq-17-O1 . 432 00 103425 804. 00 99999 THUNDER PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTION OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17-01 . 804 00 103426 1751. 76 99999 THUNDER PROMOTIONAL PRODVCT5 OPERATING SUPPLIES 04-17-01 . 103427 408. 22 49999 THVNDER PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS OPERATING 5VPPLIES 04-17-01 1751. 408 76 22 103428 177. 12 4026 THY5SEN DOVER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SVCS. 04-17-01 . 177. 12 C I T Y of L Y N W O O D iJ11+Il,illl Ili+1 f.. 04- I7 D1 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R . PA GE. 8 I I ~'~j WI,RRAIJT'll - -- Fd•IOUPIT VENGORJi VENDOR IJAMF.. DESCRIPTIOPJ INV DATE IN'JOICE AMOUNT ~,~i ___ IO'LI~J3'1 ..-. 'Sy4 00 3391 TRIANGLE SPORTS INC PLAOUE5 OQ-17-O1 594 00 1U343D 4920. OD 4256 TRUE GRF[N LANDCARE LANDSCAPE 5VC5. 04-17-01 4920 , 00 ~~ 103431 54715. 21 27V U. 5. DANK LEASE/REFIT SVC. PYMT. 04-17-01 54715 . 21 10343;? bS4 49 4018 IINITED REN'1'AI_S RENTAL 5VC5. 04-17-01 654 . 49 1034,3;) bSlO D3 l00 UNITED RENTALS RENTAL SVCS. 04-17-01 . 6510 H3 j~.~ 103434 10/2 77 4286 IINITED 1RANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION 5VC5. 04-17-O1 . 1072 77 ~' ~ 10')435 103436 5:10 G7 4147 I]5 DANCURP L.F.ASE PYMT 04-17-U1 . 530. 67 I ~~ 52704. 72 4101 055 CAL DUILDER5, INC. CONSTRUCTION 5VC5. 04-17-01 52704 72 I „ 103437 192. 00 99999 VERONICA E, MARTINEZ REFUND/PARKING 04--17-01 , 142 00 i j 103438 103439 ?5. 00 283 l_UCILLE WALKER COMMUNITY COMM 3/21 04-17-01 . 25. 00 350. 53 99999 WARREN SPRING ?~ MFG. CO. REPAIR SVCS, 04--17-O1 350 53 ., 10344q 1375. 14 4038 IJASTE MANMAGEMENT COMPTON HUS STOP CLEAN UP 04-17-01 . 1375 14 ,, 103441 15052. 13 352V IJ.S.A. WAS CE MANAGEMENT TRASH P[CK-UP 04-17-01 . 15852 13 ~~, 103442 126. 01 3707 WASTE MANAGEMENT RENTAL SVCS. 04-17-01 . 126 01 ;,~ 103443 2615. 83 191 WAVE COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING SVC 5. 04-17-01 . 2615 H3 .~ 103444 103445 I1H. 25 1058 WAXIE OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17-01 . 118. 25 + 1150. 60 3598 WED ENTERPRISES PROFESSIONAL SVCS. 04-17-01 1150 00 I, 103446 19402 UU 3469 lJEST GROUP UE51GN CCINEiULT1NG SVCS. 04-17-U1 . 19402 00 ,., 103447 179. 01 99999 WEST r,FtOUP PAYMENT CTR DUF..S `!, SUHSCRIPTIOIJ U4-t7-O1 . 179 U1 ~•.I 103448 19. 00 293 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR EXTERMINATING 5VC5. 04-17-01 . 19 00 I 103449 253. 80 299 WHITTLER FERTILIZER CO. OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17-01 . 253 80 e, 103450 45. 29 99999 WILLIE E. PORTER r WTR REFUND ACCT CLaD 04-17-01 . 45 29 :~) 103451 1250. 94 412D WORLD LITERACY CRUSADE COMMUNITY SVCS. D4--17-01 . 1250 94 ~, 103452 299 OG 127E1 WORLD S[lE NETIJORK~i INTERNET SVCS. 04-17-O1 , 299 00 ~; 1(]3453 915, 00 ,,")Ob XERO% CORPORATIOW FAX MACHINE 04-17-01 . 915 00 ~~ 103454 2251. 14 3366 XERO% CORPORATION LEASE AGREEMENT FEE 04-17-01 . 2251 14 ,; 103455 50. 00 99999 YAD1 FARI~ADI DENTAL. REIMDUHSEMEIJT 04-17-01 . 50 00 ., 103456 2320, 50 307 YOUNG PEOPLE OF LYNWOOD CLEAN UP SVCS, 04-L7-01 . 2320 50 •i 103457 43. 36 999V9 ZOELA IAVAS WTR REFUNO ACCT CL!iD 04-17-01 . q3 36 `I 103458 1267. 64 308 ZU11AR IhJUIJ,TRIE5, INC_ OPERATING SUPPLIES O4-17-01 1267. 64 1810713. 39 11'1 1810713. 39 PREPAID: 103D95-103177 SPOILED 103252-103257 VOIDS, I [_- '~ ~~ 4~ ANDREA L. HOOPER CITY CLERK Date: To: From: By: Subject: City of ~Yl~ DOD L~ Ctty vUeeting CkaQQenges 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (310) 603.0220 April 17, 2001 Honorable Mayor and City Councilrnembers Ralph W. Davis, II, City Manager Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT - ST. EMYDIUS CHURCH FESTIVAL COMMENTS: ill-~M~ ''II~~ St. Emydius Church is requesting a Special Permit to have a Festival on the grounds of the Church: • May 18th 5 p.m. -11 p.m. • May 19th 11 a.m. -11 p.m. • May 20th 8 a.m. - 10 o.m. This Festival is being held to enable the Church to accept students who haven't the resources to pay their school expenses. RECOMMENDATION: That Council review and direct staff accordingly. CLERK2001.014 rn „~, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT CITY OF LYNWOOD 11330 BULLIS ROAG LYNWOOD CA 90262 310-603-0226 arrucANT INFORMATION: NAME ST. EMYDIUS CHURCH CDLiI: PHONE(3101 637-7095 ADDRESS 10900 California Av _ CITY Twnwood ZIP 90262 OCCUPATION: NUMBER OF PERSONS EMPLOYED:All ~roll7nfPar SSE: (State Board of Eauai¢at~on Numoer~ EVENT INFORMATION TYPE OF PERMIT REQUESTED: FFCmTVnr. DATE(S) OF EVENT: Mai, ~ ~ _ i g R ~n ~nn~ HOURS OF OPERATIONMay 1 8:5:00-1 1 : pm. , May 1 9 • 1 1 • am -1 1 pm, May 20.8am 1 Op ADDRESS OF PROPOSED EVENT LOCATION' School Grounds, l 0900 California Ave.LY SPECIFIC AREA DESIGNATED FOR EVENT: St . Em dius Grounds 1S STREET CLOSURE BEING REQUESTED: YES ~0 (CIRCLE ONE) (IF YES. BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR EVENT AND CLOSURE:) IF INDOORS. APPROXIMATE TOTAL GROUND FLOOR AREA OF STRUCTURE HAVE YOU MADE AN APPLICATION FOR THIS TYPE OF PERMIT BEFORE YES NO IF YES. L^.~HERE A~;D ;;rH~"; CITY OF LYIVWOOD March 2000 IS THIS AFOR-PROFIT OR NON-PROFIT EVENT? (CIRCLE ONE) IF THIS IS A NON-PROFIT EVENT OR A CERTAIN PORTION OF THE PROCEEDS BEI~EFIT A NON-PROFIT AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION, PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: NAME OF ORGANIZATION BEING BENEFITED: ST. EMYDIUS SCHOOL STATE NON-PROFIT NUMBER: ADDRESS OF ORGANIZATION: , A O ~ ~ ~, ~ i ;fnrni , n PHONE IS A WAIVER OF FEES BEING REQUESTED: YES NO IF YES. EXPLAIN: Proceeds will go to enable St. Emydius non-profit school to accept students who haven't the resources to a' their ex enses. A NEGOTIATED PERCENTAGE OF THE PROCEEDS IS REQUESTED TO 8E DONATED TO THE CITY. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND COMPLETE AND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENTS OF MATE L FACTS WILL CAUSE A FORFEITURE OF FEES AND u^EiviAL ^r^• •' OF rCr~rv„T. % `~ ~ /y ® i SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT AT m O ~ ~ ~ 8 ~i SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE ~ '~ ~ ~ A~~CCEPTANCE OF THIS APPLICATION FOR R ~- Z ~ "~, EVIEW DOES NOT IMPLY APPROVAL. TH1S ~ ~ ~ N ~ PERMIT REQUIRES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED ACCORDINGLY LL ly lV ~W~v W ~ x~~~ ~~: U ~iN IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. AGENDA ~~ Q~,~-~ ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE 't ~ ~' `' ~ °' ~' ~` CITY QF LYh~vV~OL` LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON CITY c~F~~. ~ OFr=1CE April 16, 2001 BATEMAN HALL 9:00 A. M. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS III CITY CLERK ANDREA L. HOOPER i~. ~~ .~`~"~FJ ARTURO.REYES COUNCILMEMBER ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY ATTORNEY SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY TREASURER IRIS PYGATT OPENING CEREMONIES 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards, II 3. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5.) .~ ""'"^ 4. ANTI LITTER FEASIBILITY STUDY Comments: As part of the Strategic Planning Process, (Goal 1, Objective 8, Strategy 3), it was suggested that the City of Lynwood "review the feasibility of instituting a take out assessment on fast food restaurants". Recommendation: Staff recommends for the Mayor and Members of the City Council to adopt the attached resolution, authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached "Professional Consulting Services Agreement" between the City of Lynwood and DMG Maximus, Inc. for the purpose of hiring a consultant to conduct an anti litter feasibility study and to appropriate $13,000 from unappropriated fund balance to 1-4111-4220 to cover costs relative to this project. 5. OPPOSITION TO SENATE BILL SB910 Comments: The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) requires that cities have a Housing Element approved by HCD by January 1, 2002. Senator Joe Dunn has initiated Senate Bill SB 910 that would set forth fines, penalties and lawsuits against cities that do not have a Housing Element approved by HCD. Such fines would include: Fines up to $1,000 per unit of a city's Regional Housing Needs (RHNA); and Withholding of State funds (including gas tax funds); and establishes legal rebuttals. The League of California Cities adamantly opposes Senate Bill SB910 and encourages other cities to oppose. Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution of opposition to SB910 and direct. staff to prepare a letter of opposition for the Mayor. CLOSED SESSION NONE ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 17, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM, CITY HALL, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. MEMORANDUM DATE: April 16, 2001 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Manager ~~~'n-=~ BY: Autra C. Adams, Project Manager SUBJECT: Anti Litter Feasibility Study PURPOSE: Staff recommends for the Mayor & Members of the Lynwood City Council to adopt the attached resolution, authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached "Professional Consulting Services Agreement" between the City of Lynwood and DMG Maximus, Inc. for the purpose of hiring a consultant to conduct an anti litter feasibility study and to appropriate $13,000 from unappropriated fund balance to 1-4111-4220 to cover costs relative to this project. BACKGROUND: As part of the Strategic Planning Process, (Goal 1, Objective 8, Strategy 3), it was suggested that the City of Lynwood "review the feasibility of instituting a take out assessment on fast food restaurants". On December 19, the City Attorney's Office made a presentation to this body regarding the legal issues involved with an anti-litter regulatory fee. At that same meeting staff was asked to: report on how the Chicago Anti-Litter Tax was imposed, review revenue generating potential, and establish testing procedures that show the percentage of litter that can be attributed to individual facilities. ANALYSIS: City of Chicago In Chicago, the anti-litter tax began on March 1, 2000. It is an additional'/Z percent (.5%) tax that applies to the sale of carryout food sold in the City by restaurants, cafeterias and other places for eating. Carry out food is basically defined as any food prepared for immediate consumption that is wrapped or enclosed in disposable containers that allows a consumer to carry the food out of the establishment and immediately consume it. For example, anything sold at McDonalds would automatically be taxed even if the purchaser consumed the food on premises. If a large pizza is purchased for carryout the tax is not assessed, however, if an individual slice of pizza is purchased at same establishment the tax is assessed. The anti-litter tax has gone through litigation and the appellate court has determined that the tax is lawful under State of Illinois law. City of Lynwood Staff has reviewed this concept and feels that we should retain a consultant to assist in determining Lynwood's annual costs in litter clean up efforts and to determine revenue generating alternatives. Staff has interviewed several consultants and feel that DMG-Maximus is most qualified to perform the study. "' FDA - ~~ The scope of work for the feasibility study is as follows: • Determine litter abatement costs, and • Comparison of revenue generating alternatives based upon economic efficiency, administrative complexity, political acceptance, and revenue generating potential. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends for the Mayor & Members of the Lynwood City Council to adopt the attached resolution, authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached "Professional Consulting Services Agreement" between the City of Lynwood and DMG Maximus, Inc. for the purpose of hiring a consultant to conduct an anti litter feasibility study and to appropriate $13,000 from unappropriated fund balance to 1-4111-4220 to cover costs relative to this project. ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO SIGN THE ATTACHED "PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT" BETWEEN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AND DMG -Maximus INC. WHEREAS, The City of Lynwood has determined that an enormous amount of litter exists along major thoroughfares and public facilities; and WHEREAS, The City of Lynwood has determined that a large percentage of litter is a result of off site consumption of perishable goods; and WHEREAS, In order to implement these goals an anti litter feasibility study needs to be conducted. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND, PROCLAIM, ORDER, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to carry out any necessary transactions as so ordered by this resolution. Section 2. That the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the "Professional Consulting Services Agreement" in order to retain DMG-Maximus, Inc. Section 3. That the City Council authorize the following appropriation to cover the costs for this project: Amount From Account Account Number $13,000 Unappropriated General Fund 1-4111-4220 Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of February, 2001. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY PAUL H. RICHARDS, II, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: RALPH W. DAVIS, III, CITY MANAGER STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } SS. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a special meeting held on the 16`h day of April, 2001. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ANDREA L. HOOPER, CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } SS. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. on file in my office and that said Resolution was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this 16"'day of April, 2001. ANDREA L. HOOPER, CITY CLERK DMG-MAXIMUS , INS . SCOPE OF SERVICES PROJECT OVERVIEW The City of Lynwood (City) wishes to perform a feasibility study to determine the most appropriate method of raising revenue to support a planned Litter Abatement Program. The City has obtained legal counsel determining various methods of allowable charges, fees, and taxes to support such a program. Therefore, the legality of the selected revenue source is not subject to review within this proposed feasibility study. The purpose of this study is to develop an estimate of the City's costs related to a new Litter Abatement Program, and to outline various methods of generating the revenues needed to support this new program. The City has solicited the assistance of a consultant to determine the costs and outline the alternatives. TASK PLAN There are three primary tasks related to this organizational review: ^ Determine Litter Abatement Program Costs ^ Compare Revenue Alternatives ^ Prepare City Council Report In order to accomplish these three tasks, DMG-MAXIMUS, Inc. (DMG) will assign Brian A. Foster to serve as Project Manager of this engagement. Mr. Foster is experienced in the field of revenue systems and revenue and tax management, and is an expert in organizational costing. Mr. Foster will be assisted by Mr. Stephen B. Liftman, who will work closely with Mr. Foster to accomplish each of the three primary tasks, described in more detail below. TASK 1: DETERMINE LITTER ABATEMENT PROGRAM COSTS In Task 1, DMG will interview City staff responsible for conducting its current litter abatement activities in Lynwood. PAGE 1 DMG - N1AX I MUS , I NC . Further, DMG will review with City staff its plans to implement a planned, enhanced Litter Abatement Program. As part of the program description, it is expected that each department involved in litter abatement will have a thorough understanding of their role with respect to litter control. Further, it is expected that departmental staff, or the City's Finance staff, will have current data related to the budgeted and historical costs of providing litter abatement services. Should the City not have this cost data readily available, then DMG would work with City staff to develop cost estimates related to these services. Such estimates would include the costs of direct staff, departmental overhead, vehicles and equipment, contractors (if any), and other costs that could be attributable directly to litter control services. The integrity of this analysis is dependent upon the City's maintenance of accurate cost data related to these activities. Therefore, if the City does not have relevant and accurate cost data available, DMG will meet with the City Manager to determine whether this study should proceed, and if so, under what conditions and time frames. For example, the City may need extended time to accumulate required data, or the City may choose to amend this Scope of Services to provide for DMG to assemble the cost data (for additional fees). To the extent that there would be program changes associated with this new task, DMG would work with the City's Finance staff to estimate the cost of these program changes, and to roll those costs into the revenue requirement for this new program. TASK 2: COMPARE REVENUE ALTERNATIVES In Task 2, DMG would review with staff and the City Attorney various alternative mechanisms for generating the revenue needed to support the planned Litter Abatement Program. Alternative mechanisms include, but are not limited to, taxes, fees, charges, improvement districts, and assessment districts. DMG will review each of the identified alternatives and determine their relative strengths with respect to the following: D Economic efficiency D Political acceptance 0 Administrative complexity PAGE 2 DMG-MAXIMUS, INC. ^ Revenue generation potential ^ Other factors to be determined DMG will not review the legal ramifications of these alternatives, but will work with the City Attorney to identify possible legal constraints, such as those imposed by Proposition 218 and other statutes that regulate fees, charges, and taxes. TASK 3: PREPARE CITY COUNCIL REPORT In Task 3, DMG will prepare a report for review by the City Council that details the projected costs of the new Litter Abatement Program, as identified in Task 1, and which discusses the revenue generating alternatives identified in Task 2. This report will compare each of the alternatives against a common set of criteria, considering factors of economic efficiency, political acceptance, administrative complexity, revenue generating potential, and the like. While DMG will prepare this Council report, it is expected that the City will select the alternative that best meets its needs, if any, for further consideration. Should the City require additional assistance once it has selected an alternative revenue mechanism, DMG would be available to assist with its implementation. PAGE 3 PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement made this loth day of April, 2001, by and between the City of Lynwood hereinafter referred to as Client, and DMG-MAXIMUS, INC., an Illinois corporation authorized to do business in California, hereinafter referred to as Consultant. In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows. 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES: Consultant shall be responsible to perform the services set forth in its proposal dated February 8, 2001 which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 2. TERM: Consultant shall commence services on April 30, 2001 and complete services by June 15, 2001 unless conditions arise outside of Consultant's control which impede completion by that date. Consultant agrees to perform its services in a professional, expeditious manner. 3. COMPENSATION: FEES Client agrees to pay Consultant a fee of $12,900.00. This fee includes expenses. Upon request, Consultant shall provide documentation of its expenses. Consultant shall invoice monthly for professional fees and expenses. Invoices shall provide detail sufficient to the Client's requirements. The Client shall pay the invoice within thirty days of Client's receipt of the invoice. 4. TERMINATION: The Client may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon giving thirty (30) days written notice to Consultant. In the event the Client terminates this Agreement, Consultant shall be entitled to be paid for professional services and expenses incurred through the date of receipt of notice of termination. Consultant may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon giving thirty (30) days written notice to the Client. In the event Consultant terminates this Agreement, ..~ .~-. Consultant shall be entitled to receive compensation and expenses accrued to the date of receipt of notice of termination. 5. PERSONNEL: Consultant represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel necessary to perform the services required under this Agreement. All of the services required hereunder shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in performing the services shall be qualified to do so. All services to be performed hereunder shall be in accordance with professional standards in the field. 6. SUBCONTRACTING / ASSIGNMENT: Consultant reserves the right to subcontract for services hereunder. Consultant agrees to notify the Client in writing of any such subcontracts and the services to be performed in accordance with the subcontracting arrangement. Provided further, Consultant may assign this Agreement to its parent company or an affiliated company that succeeds to the business of Consultant contemplated herein. 7. INSURANCE: If required, Consultant shall provide a certificate of insurance prior to commencement of the engagement. The certificate shall clearly indicate that the Consultant has obtained insurance including identification of the type and amount of coverage. In the absence of written notification to Consultant, the certificate of insurance as presented shall constitute compliance with any and all insurance requirements. 8. INDEMNIFICATION: Each party shall be responsible for its own acts and will be responsible for all damages, costs, fees and expenses which arise out of the performance of this Agreement and which are due to that party's own negligence, tortious acts and other unlawful conduct and other unlawful conduct and the negligence, tortious acts and other unlawful conduct of its respective agents, officers and employees. In the absence of negligent acts, errors or omissions in Consultant's performance hereunder, the Client shall defend, indemnify and hold Consultant free and harmless from and against any claims, demands, actions, damages, expenses, fees and liabilities arising by virtue of any 2 and all claims, demands or actions brought by third parties which are related in an_y w•ay to the Client's implementation of Consultant's recommendations and findings. 9. ASSIGNMENT: Consultant agrees not to assign, convey or transfer its interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Client which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 10. TIME OF PERFORMANCE: Consultant shall perform the services required hereunder in a timely, professional manner. The Consultant shall not be considered in default by reason of any failure in performance which arises from causes outside the control of Consultant or its subcontractors. 11. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: Consultant shall deliver to the Client all deliverables required to be submitted consistent with the Scope of Services hereunder. All working papers shall remain the property of Consultant. Consultant shall maintain its working papers for a period of 3 years from the date of execution of this Agreement. 12. CONFIDENTIALITY: The Client agrees that in connection with this Agreement it may become aware of confidential information, trade secrets, marketing strategies and properties whether or not subject to copyright protection of Consultant. Client covenants and agrees to use its best efforts and diligence in guarding Consultant's confidential information, trade secrets, marketing strategies and properties whether or not subject to copyright protection. The Client further covenants and agrees that its employees and agents will not, directly or indirectly (as manager, consultant, employee, partner or shareholder) use for himself or others any of Consultant's confidential information, trade secrets, marketing strategies and properties whether or not subject to copyright protection during or at any time after the term of this Agreement. 13. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. The Client acknowledges that during the term of this Agreement it may receive information from the Consultant that the Consultant regards as confidential and proprietary. The Consultant may, during the term of the Agreement, identify information as proprietary by identifying same in writing to 3 the Client as proprietary information of the Consultant. The Client shall keep secret, retain in strictest confidence and prevent the unauthorized duplication, use and disclosure of information identified by the Consultant as proprietary. The Client further agrees not to disclose the information identified as proprietary to third parties. The Client acknowledges that the Consultant will suffer irreparable damage in the event to a breach to this paragraph. 14. INFORMATION. Consultant shall assume without incurring any liability therefore that all information and data provided by the Client is accurate, timely, and complete. 15. SEVERABILITY: If any term or provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable, they are, to that extent deemed omitted. The rest of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 16. WAIVER OF BREACH: The waiver of either Consultant or Client of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by either Consultant or Client. 17. AMENDMENTS: No amendment or variation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by all of the parties hereto. 18. THIRD PARTIES: The Client and the Consultant are the only parties to this Agreement and are the only parties entitled to enforce its terms. Nothing in this Agreement gives, is intended to give, or shall be construed to give or provide, any right or benefit, whether directly or indirectly or otherwise, to third persons. 19. INTERPRETATION: The validity, interpretation and effect of this Agreement shall be determined under California law. All actions arising directly or indirectly as a result or in consequence of this Agreement shall be instituted and litigated only in courts having situs in the State of California. If other agreements, the terms of which are the same or substantially the same as this Agreement, have been executed by Consultant, 4 interpretation of this and such other, same or similar agreements shall be applied uniformly. Any provision found to be invalid or unenforceable shall have no effect upon the validity of any other section of this contract. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This is the entire agreement of the parties and supercedes all prior written and oral communications between them with respect to the subject matter hereof. Any change, alteration or modification of this agreement must be in writing and signed by the parties and cannot be changed or modified orally. 21. NOTICES: All written notices, demands or requests of any kind which either party may be required or may desire to serve on the other in connection with this Agreement may be served (as an alternative to personal service) by registered or certified mail or air freight services that provide proof of delivery. Any such notice or demand so served by registered or certified mail shall be deposited in the United States mail with postage and fees thereon fully prepaid, and addressed to the parties so to be served as follows: If to Consultant: DMG-MAXIMUS, INC., Ltd. 60 Revere Drive, Suite 200 Northbrook, Illinois 60062 If to Client: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Manager 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, CA 90262 Service of any such notice or demand so made by mail shall be deemed complete on the day of actual delivery as shown by the addressee's registry or certification receipt. Either party hereto may from time to time, by notice in writing served upon the other as aforesaid, designate a different mailing address, or (a) different or additional person(s) to which or to whom all such notices or demands are thereafter to be addressed. Persons named to receive copies of notices are listed for accommodation only and are not required to be served to comply with service of notice on a party (are required to be served to comply with service of notice). 5 CONSULTANT: DMG-MAXIMUS, INC. By: Date: CLIENT: City of Lynwood By: Date: DATE: April 16, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager'''1~"L'~ Gary Chicots, Community Development Director BY: Grant Taylor, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Opposition to Senate Bill SB910 BACKGROUND The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) requires that cities have a Housing Element approved by HCD by January 1, 2002. Senator Joe Dunn has initiated Senate Bill SB 910 that would set forth fines, penalties and lawsuits against cities that do not have a Housing Element approved by HCD. Such fines would include: Fines up to $1,000 per unit of a city's Regional Housing Needs (RHNA); and Withholding of State funds (including gas tax funds); and Establishes legal rebuttals. The League of California Cities adamantly opposes Senate Bill SB910 and encourages other cities to oppose. DISCUSSION Attached is a City Council Resolution of opposition and copies of correspondence from the League of California Cities. Community Development Department staff is extremely opposed to SB 910. As identified above, the bill could have critical negative fiscal impacts and is unfair to smaller densely populated municipalities. In addition, the Regional Housing Needs (RHNA) assessment formula and City of Lynwood RHNA allocation is questionable and in dispute. In 1997 the State allocated the City of Lynwood 979 new dwelling units as the City's RHNA number to be implemented by the year 2005. The City has approved approximately 200 housing units, however, the revised Housing Element has identified specific sites where the 979 units could be developed. Identifying specific sites is consistent with State Law and was recommended by HCD. The Housing Element was approved by the Planning Commission but rejected by HCD. The comments and corrections from HCD were relatively minimal except for identifying specific sites. Staff has identified the sites, is addressing other HCD concerns and intends to present the Housing Element to the City Council soon. After Council approval, the Housing Element would be sent back to HCD for approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution of opposition to SB910 and direct staff to prepare a letter of opposition for the Mayor. Attachments: League of California Cities Legislation Bulletin League of California Cities Opposition Letters Resolution of Opposition to SB 910 H:\WORDFILE\PLANNING\STAFFRPT`memo.counciLsb910.doc ~ ,..--~_______. w - - -- ! ,a.:..r ~'~~l'~ ~ ~~ !~ 1"~" ~ ~ i. League of California Cities . ,,,,., Page 1 of 2 League of CCalifornia pities www. caci t~es.org Register Now Housiny and Land Use Legislation Housing and land use issues include general plans and zoning, housing, rent contr residential care facilities, land use regulation, development fees, annexation and in development agreements, building standards, economic development, military bass mobile home regulation and sign regulation. The League believes in local control c decisions as they relate to land use and economic development. * * Your Action Is Needed SB 910 (Dunn, Burton, Haynes & Monteith) Housing Elements: Fines, Penalties, and Lawsuits. SB 910 passed out of the Senate Housing and Community Development Committee on April 2~d on a 5-1 vote with Senator Monteith abstaining. Senator Ackerman cast the only NO vote. The bill is headed for the Senate Appropriations Committee. If your Senator is a member of the Appropriatioi Committee please make contact and urge him/her to oppose this bill. The members of the Senate Appropriations Committee are Senators Alpert, Batt Bowen, Burton, Escutia, Johannessen, Johnson, Karnette, McPherson, Mui Perata, Poochigian and Speier. This bill requires a court that finds that a local government's housing elemei not in substantial compliance with the state law governing housing element; levy a penalty not to exceed $1,000 per unit of the total projected housing n the jurisdiction, and award the plaintiff attorney's fees and costs. This bill fu provides that in any action filed on or after January 1, 2002, challenging the of a housing element, there shah be a rebuttable presumption of nonvalidity housing element or amendment if the Department of Housing and Commun Development (HCD) has found that the element or amendment does not su comply with state law. The bill also includes language stating the Legislatui to withhold state funding from any city, county, or city and county that does housing element in substantial compliance with state law, and to redistribute withheld funds to those jurisdictions that are in compliance. This bill would ; your local subventions or the portion of the state's gas tax that is allocated c cities if your housing element is found out of compliance with HCD. Starting reduction and gradually increasing to 60% depending on how long you are ~ Furthermore, your portion will be reallocated back into the pool and redistrik are in compliance. Specifically, SB 910 was amended on March 27th to inc in the percentage of the gas tax that a city or county would receive unless tl has an adopted housing element that HCD has determined to be in substan the following amounts: • A 20% reduction for local governments whose third or subsequent revi: element has not been found by HCD to be in substantial comoliance wit http://www.cacities.org/doc.asp?intParentID=952 4/9/01 League of California Cities Page 2 of 2 current deadline; A 40% reduction for local governments whose third or subsequent revi: element has not been found by HCD to be in substantial compliance wit current deadline; A 60% reduction for local governments whose third or subsequent revi: element has not been found by HCD to be in substantial compliance wit current deadline. SB 910 would also: 1) return the withheld funds to the total pool available fc following month to eligible local governments; 2) states that an adopted hou been self-certified shall be deemed approved by HCD unless a court finds tl housing element is not in substantial compliance; and 3) requires HCD to pl Controller on a monthly basis a list of local governments whose third or subsequent he revisions have not been determined by HCD to be in substantial compliance, and shy date for each of the local governments on that list. CONTACT YOUR LEGISI REPRESENTATIVES AND URGE THEM TO VOTE NO ON THIS BILL. Click here to view the joint League-CSAC letter letter of opposition on SB 910. Click here to view a sample oppose letter for cities. UPDATED APRIL 9r", For additional information on Housing and land use issues contact League staff: D~ Zimmermann. LEGISLATION FACTS ABOUT CITIES !~~ TRANSPORTATION FUNQING FISCAL REFORM FOR CITIES http://www.cacities. org/doc. asp?intParentID=952 4/9/01 ~. SB 910 (Dunn) Sample Oppose Letter March XX, 2001 Senator Joe Dunn State Capitol, Room 2080 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: SB 910 (Dunn). Housing Elements. Fines, Penalties, and Litigation. Notice of Opposition Dear Senator Dunn: We regret to inform you that the City of OPPOSES your SB 910, as introduced. In brief, this measure establishes a legal rebuttable presumption of nonvalidity for a housing element if the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has found that the element or amendment does not substantially comply with state law, requires a court to levy a penalty up to $1,000 per unit of the total projected housing need of the affected city or county, in addition to mandatory attorney's fees and costs, and establishes legislative intent to withhold additional state funding, and to redistribute the withheld funds to those jurisdictions that HCD deems in compliance. This measure shifts the legal standard for housing element review from innocent until proven guilty to guilty until proven innocent, by declaring that a local housing element is presumed invalid in a court if a local government fails to comply with every whim of the state reviewer. This change has the effect of elevating the opinion a state plan reviewer above the opinion of a judge, and causing serious consequences for both local governments and developers, because any local decision made by the local government--issuing building permits, approving subdivision maps, adoption of zoning ordinances, approving development projects--based upon that general plan become subject to legal challenge. Furthermore, this bill treats local elected officials as criminals by imposing $1,000-per-unit penalties, and stating legislative intent for the state to divert additional local revenues away from local government, when state plan reviewers fail to deem an element in substantial compliance. This approach is offensive, and ignores the already substantial powers of a Court to deal with invalid general plans under Section 65755 of the Government Code. We completely object to this measure which attempts to cast local governments and their locally elected officials in a very negative light, such that they must be fined, sued, forced, and threatened into compliance with the state over a state supervised process called the housing element. We care deeply about our community and the many needs of our constituents. Due to the lack of state-local fiscal reform, even after years of state surpluses, we struggle to meet the full range of needs for our community with limited property tax resources, and attempt to provide housing for our citizens with little help from the state or federal level to meet the affordable housing needs of our citizens. Therefore, we are offended by this measure and its focus on fines, penalties, threats from the state over the review of our local housing element by state officials, who may never have even been to our city, and may care little about the variety or complexity of the issues that we balance every day. Include a paragraph which explains local efforts to support housing in your city, as well as any comments on your city's experience with the housing element process. Addressing this state's many housing needs requires a productive working relationship between local governments and the state, and a discussion that must involve the full scope of issues which affect housing production. This is the wrong approach. Sincerely, XXXXXX City Official City of cc: Members and Consultant, Senate Housing and Community Development Committee YOUR SENATE and ASSEMBLY MEMBERS (Call Them As Well) Senator John Burton Senator Ray Haynes Senator Dick Monteith Senator Tom Torlakson Assembly Member Alan Lowenthal Assembly Member Pat Wiggins Julie Bornstein, Director, Department of Housing and Community Development Mike Gotch, Legislative Secretary, Governor's Office 2 League of California Cities 1400 K Street, 4`h Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 658-8200 March 21, 2001 Senator Joe Dunn State Capitol, Room 2080 Sacramento, CA 95814 California State Association of Counties 1100 K Street, Suite 101 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916)327-7500 RE: SB 910 (Dunn). Housing Elements. Fines, Penalties, and Litigation. Notice of Opposition Dear Senator Dunn: We regret to inform you that the League of California Cities {League) and California State Association of Counties (CSAC) OPPOSE your SB 910, as introduced. In brief, this measure: 1) Establishes a legal rebuttable presumption of nonvalidity for a housing element or amendment if the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has found that the element or amendment does not substantially comply with state law, for any lawsuit filed after January 1, 2002. 2) Requires a court to levy a penalty up to $1,000 per unit of the total projected housing need for a city or county, if the court finds that a local government's housing element is not in substantial compliance with the state law governing housing elements, in addition to awarding plaintiffs attorney's fees and costs. 3) Establishes legislative intent to withhold state funding from any city, county, or city and county that does not have a housing element in substantial compliance with state law, and to redistribute the withheld funds to those jurisdictions that are in compliance. Before addressing the specifics of this proposal, we would like to convey a perspective from local governments, that are just one partner in the shared responsibility of meeting the housing needs of the state's citizens. We completely object to this measure which appears to cast local governments and their locally elected officials in a very negative light, such that they must be fined, sued, forced, and threatened into compliance with the state over a state supervised process called the housing element. Local elected officials care deeply about their communities and the many needs of their constituents. Local elected officials constantly struggle with limited property tax resources, and scarce housing subsidies from either the federal or state level to meet the affordable housing needs of their citizens. Local elected officials and their planning staff pack conference rooms at HCD workshops and forums to gather information on what is needed for their housing elements. They allocate tax dollars to hire staff and consultants to help them through the Byzantine housing element process that extracts significant costs, time, and attention with .-.~. sometime questionable results. We strongly disagree with casting local elected officials as uncaring about their communities and question the productiveness of such an offensive approach. As you know, California's 475 cities and 58 counties vary greatly in size, climate, topography and economic conditions. Some cities are land-locked with growing populations and little available land, other cities are facing booming job markets with high paid workers where the competition for housing drives the price of the smallest cottage over half a million dollars. Still other cities, with adjacent base closures, are in depressed economic markets with blocks of vacant housing and retail stores. While counties are constantly relied upon to provide open space, habitat preservation and agricultural opportunities, and often scrutinized by labeling county development as "sprawl." All of these cities and counties, through their elected representatives, are striving to improve the quality of life and opportunities for their citizens. Having available affordable housing plays a critical role in the creation of a community, but as you know, just as in the Legislature, housing is not the only issue. Public safety, libraries, education, parks, public works, flood control, air quality, protecting the environment, open space, protecting agricultural lands, these are other issues which elected local officials must grapple with, in addition to meeting an array of existing state mandates and providing state services in the health, welfare and justice arena, as well as preparing for the many additional state mandates proposed in the Legislature each year. Now that some context has been established, here are our specific issues with this bill: 1) This Bill Shifts the Legal Standard From Innocent Until Proven Guilty to Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Under existing law, if HCD determines that a housing element is in substantial compliance with state law, the housing element is presumed to be valid, thus creating for the local government a legal "safe harbor" which protects a local government in a legal challenge to its general plan: a very valuable feature. However, under existing law, section 65585(f) Government Cude, local governments have the choice of either amending the draft element to comply with HCD's recommendations, or to self-certify and adopt the draft element with findings on why the local government believes that the draft element substantially complies with the requirements of the law despite HCD's findings. This flexibility has the effect of tempering the potential for an overly-zealous interpretation of the law by the state. Just because a state official fails to pronounce a housing element in substantial compliance with state law does not mean a judge will feel the same way. Therefore, if a local government believes that a state official is requesting unreasonable changes to a local housing element, and their attorney advises them that they have awell- prepared element that complies with state law, then the local government is free to run the risk of being challenged without the safe harbor provision, if they feel that they can fairly argue before a Court that their element complies with the provisions of state law even absent the "substantial compliance" blessing by HCD. This bill, however, by establishing a rebuttable presumption of nonvalidity, creates a legal presumption that a local housing element is invalid if it has not been deemed in substantial compliance with state law by HCD, and therefore subjects the local government to all the fines, penalties, and legal actions promoted by this legislation. What is particularly offensive about this approach is the presumption that the local government is a bad actor and somehow criminal when HCD fails to determine their housing element in compliance; when the reality may be that the local government has struggled to comply with the edicts of the state and has produced an element that meets 98 percent of HCD's requirement, but the state rejects the entire element over a few minor points. Furthermore, the "guilty until proven innocent" approach has the effect of injecting state workers directly into the "approval" business of local general plans. Those local officials who fail to respond to every potentially questionable demand of the state official reviewing their element, will be exposed to a barrage of fines and penalties for daring to question the discretion, wisdom, and rationale of state officials. In short, this is a recipe where the "rebuttable presumption of nonvalidity" elevates the opinion of an HCD staff member above the opinion of a judge. 2) Effect of "Presumption of Nonvalidity" on Pending Development Projects Merits Consideration: 2 If there is a rebuttable presumption on "nonvalidity" for any housing element, which HCD fails to view in substantial compliance, then there are some serious potential consequences for both local governments and developers. Aside from all the fines, penalties, and additional diversions of local revenues by the state against the local government, the presumption of nonvalidity immediately calls into question the validity of the entire general plan because local general plans are required to be internally consistent. If the local general plan is inconsistent, than any local decision made by the local government--issuing building permits, approving subdivision maps, adoption of zoning ordinances, approving development projects--based upon that general plan are also subject to legal challenge. See Government Code section 65755; Camp v. Board of Supervisors, 123 Cal. App. 3d 334, 358-60 (1981); Save E! Toro Assn v. Days, 74 Cal. App. 3d 64, 70-74 (1977). Those who oppose growth in this state will no doubt welcome this new opportunity to litigate using the legal leg-up provided by the presumption of nonvalidity. 3) Mandatory Attorney's Fees: SB 910 ignores the existing well-established way of determining whether plaintiffs are entitled to their attorneys' fees and makes the award of fees automatic, thus encouraging additional litigation. There are currently two sources of attorneys' fees awards: Government Code section 800 and the private attorney general theory (CCP 1021.5). Section 800 awards fees when the action of the city was the result of arbitrary or capricious action. (An error by an official, even if clearly erroneous, does not rise to the level of arbitrary or capricious action). The cap on this award is $7500. The greater exposure is under the private attorney general theory. Under CCP 1021.5, the court MAY award fees if (a) a significant benefit has been conferred on the general public or a large class of persons; (b) the necessity and financial burden of private enforcement is such as to make the award appropriate; and (c) the case involves an important right affecting the public interest. The focus is on the impact of the action in achieving the desired result, not the manner of its resolution. These questions of whether there has been a "significant benefit"and whether it was necessary to bring the litigation are questions that should be left for a judge to decide. 4) This Bill Treats Local Elected Officials As Criminals: This bill imposes a "penalty" of up to $1,000 per unit of a jurisdiction's regional housing need if a court finds that a housing element or a portion of it fails to substantially comply with the requirements of the law. For instance, this bill proposes to levy a fine of $66.7 million dollars, in addition to whatever additional penalties the Legislature plans to attach to this bill, against the Cities of Moreno Valley, Hemet, Victorville, Chino Hills, and the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino for having the audacity to contest a flawed Regional Housing Needs Allocation process in their current lawsuit against both the Southern California Association of Governments and HCD based on 12-year-old census data that fails to reflect the economic realities of the region and proposes an additional 66,700 units be allocated to local governments who contend their communities have an over-supply of housing and lack available jobs for their residents. 5) Bill Ignores the Existing Powers of the Courts To Enforce Housing Element Law: Under existing law, if a court ruled that a local government's general plan failed to comply with existing law, the community's general plan would be suspended until an adequate plan was adopted. Section 65755 already re uires a court to include in an order or judgment, which invalidates a local general plan one or more of the following provisions: (7) Suspend the authority of the city, county, or city and county to issue building permits, or any category of building permits, and all other related permits. 3 (2) Suspend the authority of the city, county, or city and county, to grant any and all categories of zoning changes, variances, or both. (3) Suspend the authority of the city, county, or city and county, to grant subdivision map approvals. Is this not sufficient enforcement authority for the courts? We find it inappropriate for the state to exact additional fines and divert additional local revenues if a local government happens to have a difference of opinion with a state plan reviewer who may not fully understand the trade-offs and difficult choices facing the local elected officials. 6j Proposal to Divert Additional Local Revenues: In addition to all the fines and penalties proposed in this bill to be levied against any local government that questions the facts, figures, or interpretation of state employees of HCD, this bill contains intent language as a placeholder for additional provisions which will be added into this bill, to divert additional local revenues away from local governments to other local governments who have housing elements which HCD has determined to be in compliance with state law. Those who collaborate will receive rewards, those who question the assumptions, or mention local realities are penalized. Additional fines, penalties, threats, admonitions and lawsuits from the state, as opposed to grants, consistent streams of affordable housing funding, property tax return, and reforming the broken state of state-local finance, will only serve to widen the gap in the relationship between state and local government who need to work together in order to solve this critical problem facing the State. 7) Housing Element Compliance Convenient Target For Larger Housing Issues: Levying additional fines, penalties, and generating additional lawsuits against local governments over housing element compliance may give some comfort that the dramatic housing issues facing the state will suddenly be addressed. This is hardly the case. Housing production is ultimately the result of many forces in the marketplace and depends heavily on the state of the local economy, land values, lifestyle choices of citizens, and the private developers who respond to those market signals and produce products, which stand to generate the maximum profit. Local governments plan for housing, but it is ultimately the private market responding to the desires of the marketplace, which determine what is built. Constructing affordable housing in a state with high land values is a difficult task that often cannot be done unless significant levels of government subsidies are provided. The League and CSAC have consistently supported a stream of state funding for affordable housing, but over the last ten years the state has provided little housing funds, outside the one-time boost in last year's budget to address these needs. Further, the effects of the changes the federal 1986 Tax Reform Act, which removed much of the private incentive to construct and own rental housing, and contributed to the decline in multifamily production in this state from 148,000 units in 1986, to 36,000 in 2000, cannot be ignored. Construction defect litigation surrounding condominium construction has also led to a significant reduction in a form of housing that proved highly popular in the 1980's. Finally, the concerns of the electorate over open space and preserving quality of life in many high-growth areas of the state must not be forgotten, given the over 50 local land use initiatives which were on ballots last November. Above are the specific issues we have with this legislation. We are not, however, opposed to a discussion of the full range of issues associated with the housing element. Local elected officials have many issues themselves with this process which relies heavily on procedure, process, and paperwork, in addition to the full range of discussions which take place with the citizens in our communities, to whom we are ultimately held accountable. If your initial desire is to get our attention on this issue, that has been accomplished. If your intention is to start a comprehensive dialogue with all affected parties--the state, local governments, COG's, housing advocates, developers, and others--over how the housing element process can be improved, we would welcome that discussion. However, we must OPPOSE this legislation for all the reasons previously stated. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Daniel Carrigg at (916) 658-8222 or DeAnn Baker at (916) 327-7500 ext. 509. 4 ~,,. ,~-, Sincerely, Daniel Carrigg Legislative Representative League of California Cities Counties DeAnn Baker Legislative Representative California State Association of cc: Members and Consultant, Senate Housing and Community Development Committee Senator John Burton Senator Ray Haynes Senator Dick Monteith Senator Tom Torlakson Assembly Member Alan Lowenthal Assembly Member Pat Wiggins Julie Bornstein, Director, Department of Housing and Community Development Mike Gotch, Legislative Secretary, Governor's Office ~.., -'~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL, CITING FORMAL OPPOSITION TO SB 910 (DUNN, BURTON, HAYNES & MONTEITH) HOUSING ELEMENTS: FINES, PENALTIES, AND LAWSUITS. WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council did conduct a public meeting on April 16, 2001 on a duly noticed agenda item, opposition to SB 910 as identified-above; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council formally opposes SB 910, Housing Elements, Fines, Penalties and Lawsuits; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds SB 910 establishes a legal rebuttable presumption of non-validity for a housing element or amendment if the Department of Housing and Community Development has found that the element or amendment does not substantially comply with state law, for any lawsuit filed after January 1, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds SB 910 requires a court to levy a penalty up to $1,000 per unit of the total projected housing need for the city, if the court finds that the city's housing element is not in substantial compliance with the state law governing housing elements, in addition to awarding plaintiffs attorney's fees and costs; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds that SB 910 establishes legislative intent to withhold state funding from the city and to redistribute the withheld funds to those jurisdictions that are in compliance; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds SB 910 shifts the legal standard from innocent until proven guilty to guilty until proven innocent; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds SB 910 constitutes an effect of "Presumption of Non-validity" on Pending Development Project; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds SB 910 would require mandatory attorney's fees; and WHERAS, the Lynwood City Council finds SB 910 ignores the existing powers of the courts to enforce housing element law; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds SB 910 a proposal to divert additional local revenues; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds SB 910 requires housing element compliance convenient target for larger housing issues; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) numbers are subjective, ambiguous and unfair; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council finds the Community Development Department has prepared an amended Housing Element that meets and exceeds State law. H:\ W ORDFI LE\PLANNMGIRESOS4eso.counc i Lsb910.doc 1 .~,. .~. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby formally opposes SB 910. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADDOPTED this day of .2001. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney H:IWORDFILE~PLANNING~RESOS~reso.councilsb9 ] O.doc PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Department 2 w STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )SS .~"-. I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the day of _ , 2001. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk, City of Lynwood STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. on file in my office and that said resolution was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this day of 2001. City Clerk H:\ W ORDFILE~P LANNINGVtESOStreso.counc i Lsb910.doc 3 ,~ IN ORDER T EDITS CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL P~KSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A rORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. AGENDA ~c~`-a~'-c~C ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION ~ RECEIVE D AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOU LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON I CITY CLERKS OFFICE April 5, 2001 BATSMAN HALL 10:00 A. M. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER RALPH W. DAVIS III CITY CLERK ANDREA L. HOOPER APR 0 ~ 2001 AW pM 718i9i1~1~1~1112131415t6 '~ ,~ ~ C ARTURO REYES COUNCILMEMBER ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY ATTORNEY SHAN THEVER & ASSOCIATES CITY TREASURER IRIS PYGATT OPENING CEREMONIES CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards, II 3. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5.) 4. UPDATE ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Comments: Last year the, City Council approved the FY 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Projects. Staff will present to the City Council an update on the Capital Improvements Projects. Recommendation: Staff requests for the City Council to receive staffs presentation on the Capital Improvement Projects update. 5. PARKING METERS Comments: At the last Special City Council Meeting the City Council received a presentation on the parking meters. This is in conformance with Goal 1, "To create and maintain a clean community", Strategy 2, "Regulate commercial truck on lots and street". Recommendation: Staff recommends for the City Council to join staff in a field survey to determine the level of parking meters to be installed and to determine the possible locations for installation. CLOSED SESSION NONE ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 17, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM, CITY HALL, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. 2