The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About2001-05-15CC_sp~~tv of ~YN~OOI?~' ~, ,~, ,. a Mt~,~. ~ ,. ~.~ ~~ v4 City :~(eeting ChaQQenges i I I r 11330 BULLIS ROAD ~ I IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. -.... .,,.. _ ~. AGENDA `~ ` ~-l ~"~ ~~ / ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION ~ ~ ~ ~~E AT THE MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LYNWOOU TO BE HELD ON MAY 15, 2001 CITY CLERKS OFr=1CE COUNCIL CHAMBERS' 6:00 P.M. PEA'( ~ ~~ ~~r.: Aid - ~ PAUL H. RICHARDS, II ~~$I~~`-I~}I~lu~1~21~314itit6 MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD COUNCILMEMBER ARTURO REYES ~ tf ~,«, ~`-~-~" COUNCILMEMBER ~`~"~~~ ~ ~~~ ; ~,,,~ U~ ~~-~`` ARMANDO REA COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY RALPH W. DAVIS III SHAN TH~VER & ASSOCIATES CITY CLERK CITY TREASURER ANDREA L. HOOPER IRIS PYGATT OPENING CEREMONIES 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK 3. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Louis Byrd Armando Rea Arturo Reyes Ricardo Sanchez Paul H. Richards, II 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5. INVOCATION 6. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATION a) Employee Recognition Award b) Kids in Government c) Shan Powell Furillo d) Moving Wall Video Presentation 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS 8. COUNCIL RECESS TO: LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LYNWOOD INFORMATION INC. LYNWOOD PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY ~. -•,.. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only} PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIAL DISCUSSION OF THE ISSUE BY THE COUNCIL, BUT IT IS ALL RIGHT FOR COUNCIL TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54950-54962, Part III, Paragraph 5.) 9. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS: Regular Meeting, April 17, 2001 Special Meeting, April 23, 2001 Continued Special Meeting of April 23, 2001 to April 25, 2001 Special Meeting, April 25, 2001 Special Meeting, April 30, 2001 Regular Meeting, May 1, 2001 Special Meeting, May 7, 2001 PUBLIC HEARING 10. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CHILDCARE/JOB TRAINING CENTER WITH DOMINO NURSERY CENTER, INC ON THE AGENCY OWNED SITES AT ATLANTIC AVENUE AND JOSEPHINE AVENUE Comments: To conduct a joint public hearing between the Lynwood City Council (the "City") and the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") on a request to consider approval of a Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the Agency and Domino's Nursery Center Inc. ("Developer") for the development of a child care center and a job training facility. Recommendation: Staff respectfully request that the City Council and Agency open the Public Hearing and continue the Public Hearing to the next regular meeting. 11. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2000-02 HOUSING ELEMENT Comments: To conduct a public hearing in order to consider General Plan Amendment No. 2000-02, to adopt a new Housing Element citywide. Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a public hearing and after considering public oral and written comments to close the public hearing and adopt the attached resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2000-02 and adopt the attached Housing Element. 12. APPEAL NO. 2001-02 A REQUEST OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF: ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-03; CHANGING THE LYNWOOD PLAZA ZONING FROM CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) TO C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL); AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-31; AN EXPANSION OF THE EL FARALLON RESTAURANT AND DANCE HALL LOCATED AT 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD Comments: To conduct a public hearing in order to consider Appeal No. 2001-02, the Planning Commission decision to approve Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; applications to change the zoning at Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial); and approve a 2,890 square foot expansion to the EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall located at 3351 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. Recommendation: Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a public hearing and after considering public oral and written comments to close the public hearing and choose one of the following options: 1) Adopt the resolution to approve Appeal No. 2001-02 and overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, thereby denying Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. 2) Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and introduce the attached ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 and adopt the attached resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. 3) Direct staff to draft a Zoning Ordinance Amendment and thereby table the appeal, zone change and conditional use permit. 4) Deny the Zone Change thereby denying the Conditional Use Permit. 5) Take no action. In which case the conditional use permit would be deemed approved pursuant to Planning Commission action. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Council or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 13. LYNWOOD LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FY 2001-2002 Comments: This report recommends that the City Council approve the attached Engineer's Report for the Lynwood Lighting Maintenance Assessment District and adopt a resolution of intention, which sets this matter for a public hearing. Recommendation: To recommend that the City Council adopt the following resolutions: 1. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, SECTION 22565 ET SEQ., AS ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 6, 2001, RELATING TO LYNWOOD LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTICT"; AND 2. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 WITHIN LYNWOOD LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", AS AMENDED, (COMMENCING WITH STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 22500 ET SEQ.), AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS" ~. 14. LYNWOOD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FY 2001-2002 Comments: This report recommends that the City Council approve the attached Engineer's Report for the Lynwood Landscape Maintenance Assessment District and adopt a resolution of intention, which sets this matter for a public hearing. Recommendation: To recommend that the City Council adopt the following resolutions: 1. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING THE REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, SECTION 22565 ET SEQ., AS ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 6, 2001, RELATING TO LYNWOOD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT"; AND 2. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 WITHIN LYNWOOD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", AS AMENDED, (COMMENCING WITH STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 22500 ET SEQ.), AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS" 15. ORDINANCE -SECOND READING Comments: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-02 WITH RESPECT TO TRACT 8716, LOTS 188 THROUGH 196; ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 6189, PAGE 13, PARCELS 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 038 AND 902; LOCATED AT 4348, 4356 AND 4360 BREWSTER AVENUE; 11666, 11670 AND 11676 FIRST AVENUE AND THREE (3) VACANT OWNED PARCELS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERNWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND THE ALLEY WEST OF ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA FROM P-1 (PARKING) TO R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)." Recommendation: Council review and adopt the Ordinance. 16. WARRANT REGISTER: Comments: City of Lynwood warrant register for May 15, 2001 Recommendation: Staff recommends for the City Council to approve the warrant register. DISCUSSION ITEMS 17. BLOCK PARTY Comments: Denisha Smith is requesting a street closure at: Longvale between Cedar and Virginia on: September 29, 2001 for a Block Party/Birthday Party. Recommendation: That Council review and direct staff accordingly. .•, ~-., COUNCIL ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION PAUL H. RICHARDS, II, MAYOR RICARDO SANCHEZ, MAYOR PRO-TEM LOUIS BYRD, COUNCILMEMBER ARMANDO REA, COUNCILMEMBER ARTURO REYES, COUNCILMEMBER CLOSED SESSION 18. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: Number of cases: one (1) case ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 5, 2001 AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS' OF THE CITY HALL, 11330 BULLIS ROAD, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 17, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Regular Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 6:17 p.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Rea, Reyes, Sanchez and Richards answered the roll call and opened all agencies. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, City Clerk Hooper, and City Treasurer Pygatt. PRESENTATIONS /PROCLAMATIONS • Charles R. Drew University -Head Start Awareness Month • YWCA Sexual Assault Awareness Month • Paul Calderon -Martin L. King Jr. Art Contest Winner • Oscar Rodriguez -Skate Park Mural • Chamber Scholarship Pageant Contestants • Outgoing Mr. & Ms. Lynwood Mayor Richards suggested a reunion for the contestants in past competitions in the city such as Mr. & Ms. Lynwood, Ms. Fiesta Patrias, etc., be coordinated and held in the future. It was moved by Councilman Rea, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez and carried approve the presentations/proclamations. ANNOUNCEMENTS • Lynwood Concert Series • All City Track Meet • Celebrity Soccer April 21 ~ 2001 Tierra April 28, 2001 April 29, 2001 3:00 p.m. • City Manager Davis also announced a $600,000 grant received from the County ~to be used as part of the funding for the reconstruction of Imperial Highway Mayor Richards reorganized the agenda and asked that the Joint Closed Session Items be heard first as well as one Subsequent Need Item. CLOSED SESSION Item #77: Closed Session City Attorney Thever stated with respect to every item of business to be discussed in the Joint Closed Session pursuant to Section 54956.9: • A. Conference with Legal Counsel -Existing Litigation • B. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation • C. Subsequent Need: Anticipated Litigation (LRA) A(}ENV,A ITEM It was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez to hear Subsequent Need Item: Anticipated Litigation. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE It was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to recess to a Joint Closed Session at 6:45 p.m. Council reconvened at 8:00 p.m. City Attorney Thever stated Council met on the aforementioned matters and stated: • 17a. No Reportable Action • 17b. Continued to the next meeting • 17c. No Reportable Action PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Agenda Items Only) NONE PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Janet Mulligan - 5300 Cortland Presented Council with 350 signatures from residents in the Ham Park area that is opposed to a school being built there. Frank Calderon - 4010 Josephine Stated it was rude of Council to leave residents waiting during their deliberation in Closed Session. Irene Garcia - 2737 111th St. Discussed past Lynwood Information, Inc. minutes and exhaust from vehicles. Percy Brown - 11221 Pine Thanked Council fc~ supporting Neighborhood Watch and distributed tickets to their upcoming dance/fundraiser. Item #9: Minutes of Previous Meetings It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to approve: • Special Meeting • Special Meeting • Special Meeting • Regular Meeting • Special Meeting • Special Meeting March 15, 2001 March 26, 2001 April 2, 2001 April 3, 2001 April 5, 2001 April 9, 2001 2 r.. PUBLIC HEARINGS Item #70: Joint Public Hearincr for Consideration of a Proposed Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) between fhe Lynwood Redevelopment Agency (The Agency) and Access Community Housing Inc It was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to open the Public Hearing. Hear no public comments, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to close the Public Hearing. Councilman Rea discussed his concerns about using HOME dollars for this project. Considers this subsidizing a private organization. Stated the city needs a stronger residential rehabilitation program to improve existing homes. Stated it would be more sensible to rehab small homes already in the community than build new ones overtaxing current resources such as law enforcement and schools. Suggested Council revisit and prepare another RFP to better utilize the city's HOME dollars. Stated this is not the way to go and that he is against any usage of city owned land for private development. Opposes zones changes. Stated we are giving away taxpayers monies to private developers. Mayor Richards asked Community Development Director Chicots about current funding dollars available for home improvements. Community Director Chicots stated there is enough money for this year in the HOME program and that there is money available to residents for new construction and rehabilitation of existing homes. Mayor Richards discussed the need for all communities to offer new housing and a need for a good mix of old and new. Councilman Rea stated this is an old city and all HOME funding should be utilized for residential rehabilitation in the community. Stated Council needs to massage the issue of new homes. It was then moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez to adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2001.044 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: COUNCILMAN REA ABSENT: NONE After further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez to adopt: RESOLUTION N0.2001.045 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ACCESS COMMUNITY HOUSING, INC., A NON PROFIT COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: COUNCILMAN REA ABSENT: NONE Item #~ 1: General Plan Amendment No. 2000-03 & Zone Change No 2000 02 It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to open the Public Hearing. Councilman Rea discussed his opposition to the zone change as well as giving away taxpayers monies to private developers. Stated residents want to revitalize and restore existing housing. Mayor Richards stated all communities need new housing, and need a good mix of old and new housing. After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to close the Public Hearing. It was then moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez to adopt: RESOLUTION NO. 2001.046 ENTITLED• "A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2000-03 WITH RESPECT TO TRACT 8716, LOTS 188 THROUGH 196; ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 6189, PAGE 13 PARCELS 012, 013, 014, 015, 016 038 AND 902; LOCATED AT 4348, 4356 AND 4360 BREWSTER AVENUE; 11666, 11670 AND 11676 FIRST AVENUE AND THREE (3) VACANT CITY OWNED PARCELS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERNWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND THE ALLEY WEST OF ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA FROM COMMERCIAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL" It was then moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to: WAIVE READING AND INTRODUCE "AN ORDINANCE OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-02 WITH RESPECT TO TRACT 8716, LOTS 188 THROUGH 196; ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 6189 PAGE 13 PARCELS 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 038 AND 902; LOCATED AT 4348, 4356 AND 4360 BREWSTER AND THREE (3) VACANT CITY OWNED PARCELS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERNWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND THE ALLEY WEST OF ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA FROM P-1 (PARKING) TO R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: COUNCILMEN REA, REYES ABSENT: NONE Item #92: Appea! No. 2009-02 Request to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Zone Change No. 2000-03; changing the Lynwood Plaza zoning from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C3 (Heavy Commercial); and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; an expansion of the EI Farallon Restaurant and Dance Hall located at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. It was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez to open the Public Hearing. Celina Martinez - 8050 Florence, Downey Discussed design and traffic plans for project, asked if there were any questions, and asked Council to approve the project. Irene Garcia - 2737 111th Street Discussed past problems at EI Farallon and does not support the zone change for the area. Stated she is not against expansion, she doesn't want heavy commercial zoning in the area. A. Moore - 10740 San Luis Opposes the expansion of EI Farallon. Lives directly across the street from the parking lot of EI Farallon. Stated on the weekends in the parking lot there are shooting, drag racing, and under age youth hanging out in the parking lot. Stated the noise is unbelievable, and it is not fair to the residents. Does not support the re- zoning for heavy commercial either. Stated the parking lot is full of semi-trucks now and residents have to hear them revving up in before day early in the a.m. Asked Council to consider not giving EI Farallon permission to expand. Invited Council to come by their neighborhood on a Saturday around 2 a.m. and see and hear the noise. Helen Lusty - 3907 Abbott Road Opposes the expansion of EI Farallon. Discussed bullets coming through their dining room windows, stated the music is so loud it jars her windows, trash and flyers strewn all over her yard, and the music gets louder around 2-3 a.m. Stated everyone works in their neighborhood and they need their sleep. Pat Hernandez - 3957 Cortland Opposes the expansion of EI Farallon. Stated flyers from EI Farallon are being distributed at the high school, stated the restaurant serves minors, and that prostitution and drug selling is going on on the property. Wants this cancer out of her neighborhood. John Gray -10650 San Juan Opposes the expansion of EI Farallon. Discussed traffic, loud noises, screeching tires in the parking lot and minors in the nightclub. Stated he purchase his house in 1979 and expected a good return on his home. Asked why build up property for it to go down. Discussed City loan program and the loopholes that keep residents from ever getting the money. Stated it is not worth improving his property. Asked why should residents have to pay. Resident - 3825 Abbott Road Opposes the expansion of EI Farallon. Stated EI Farallon expansion would bring more problems and people to the neighborhood. Stated it degrades our city. EI Farallon does not blend in with the new construction in the area such as St. Francis Medical Center. Stated there are trash, bottles, condoms and flyers all over his yard in the mornings after events at EI Farallon. Mr. Morrision -Property owner 3614-3629 Martin L. King Blvd. Opposes the expansion of EI Farallon. His letter was read into the record by the City Clerk. Kent Swift -11126 Duncan Avenue Stated he is concerned about the issues brought up about EI Farallon. Stated the allegations are unfair and that people are innocent until proven guilty. Stated we need to explore problems before making accusations. The City cannot live by property tax alone; the city needs businesses and an economic base. Stated the area in question is nine (9) acres of prime real estate. Maria Lopez - 4245 Fernwood Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Stated it is a pleasant restaurant, and a family environment. Stated as a mom she would not attend a place that exploits minors. S. Lopez - 10630 San Luis (translated) Stated that there are no gang members in EI Farallon, and that the gang members live in the neighborhoods surrounding the restaurant. Works at EI Farallon and has had no problems in four (4) years. Janice Hermicillo - 10542 San Carlos Stated she hears guns and cars racing at EI Farallon at night and it scares her, and she wakes up her mom. Adriana Franco - EI Farallon Discussed the Spanish country music they play and stated the dress code is very strict and most patrons wear western clothes. Discussed the finger-pointing going on at the meeting. Resident - 11799 Barlow Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Stated she is an employee at EI Farallon, a widower with two (2) kids to support. Stated she has not seen any prostitution going on at the restaurant, said it is a family restaurant and asked Council to support the expansion. Resident - 5443 Olanda Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Stated he is a regular customer of the restaurant and it is a good place. Stated shootings go on everywhere and the city needs to increase security in the whole community. Stated businesses cannot control the traffic that comes to patronize them. Discussed gunshots in the community and the cultural diversity of the city. J. Jimenez - 11032 Carson Drive Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Stated it is a well-known place and a good family restaurant. Carlos Medina - 10630 San Gabriel Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Discussed issues addressed earlier. Yasmine - 10799 Barlow Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Stated it is not fair to blame Mr. Franco for the shootings and other problems that go on outside the restaurant. Ms. Rodriguez - EI Farallon Employee Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Stated the restaurant is a very nice place and that she does not believe that anyone from EI Farallon is distributing flyers to students at the high school. Ramon Rodriguez - 11106 Linden Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Discussed recent Town Hall meeting and the need for the city to support businesses. Stated Mr. Franco is trying to improve his business. Discussed shooting in the area and the fact that whatever happens in that neighborhood EI Farallon gets the blame. 6 Mr. Bell -Architect, EI Farallon Supports the expansion of EI Farallon and discussed the improvements that have been done at the restaurant. Discussed all of the good things Mr. Franco has done for the community. Stated he is a man of character. Alex Landeros -Waldorf Drive Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Discussed the limited facilities in the city that can be rented for parties and celebrations and the fact that you can't have loud music after 10 p.m. in residential neighborhoods. Jim Morton - 10112 Long Beach Blvd. Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Discussed the great job the sheriffs do and asked residents to report the problems they are having to the Sheriffs. Stated Mr. Franco is a good man. Sal Preciado - Supports the expansion of EI Farallon. Stated Mr. Franco works with all races of people and wants to provide good food, service and entertainment at his restaurant. Mario -Security Guard, EI Farallon Stated ID's are checked at the door of the restaurant, and that he hasn't seen any prostitution going on. Stated they are working with the Sheriffs Department about the cruising in the parking lot. Helen Lusty - 3907 Abbott Road Ms. Lusty spoke again and stated that the people who had spoken prior to her coming back up to make a remark do not live across the street from this problem. Told them they don't have to worry about the loud noises and the fear of their children being shot. John Gray - 10650 San Juan Spoke again and discussed family owned restaurants in other communities and that they don't appear to have the problems we have. After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Rea, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to continue the Public Hearing and bring this Item back to the May 15, 2001 meeting. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed .under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Council or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. • Councilman Rea pulled Item #14. It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to adopt: Item #73: California Department of Parks and Recreation -The 2000 Park Bond Act, Proposition 72 To receive and file the information. Ifem #75: Warrant Register RESOLUTION NO. 2001.048 ENTITLED: "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ALLOWING AND APPROVING THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS THEREFORE" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMAN SANCHEZ Item #74: Proposed Water Line Upgrade Projects Councilman Rea discussed the existing water lines and asked Public Works Director Joe Wang how the department came up with the $1,700,000 for repairs. Public Works Director Wang stated that this is a CIP Project for designated streets that have been earmarked for reconstruction. Stated waterline repairs need to be done before June when the street will be redone. Councilman Reyes discussed supervision of Water Department workers. Councilman Rea state he is not pleased with the construction of the streets .done in the last two years. Stated he is not pleased with the buckling street on Atlantic and feels the contractor did not do a good job. After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Rea to adopt: RESOLUTION N0.2001.049 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE WATER MAIN UPGRADE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO APPROPRIATE AND TRANSFER $1,700,000.00 OF UNAPPROPRIATED WATER FUND TO THE WATER MAIN UPGRADE PROJECT" ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMAN SANCHEZ DISCUSSION ITEM Item #76: Request for Special Permit - St Emydius Church Festival It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd to approve the Church Festival May 18th through 20th at the church. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCILMAN SANCHEZ COUNCIL ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Due to a malfunction of the tape, further comments of the meeting were not recorded. ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to adjourn the meeting in memory of City of Los Angeles City Council President John Ferraro at 9:55 p.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL17.2001 C 9 ~-, ~ LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 23, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Regular Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 9:07 a.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Rea, Reyes, Richards answered to roll call for all agencies. Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez was absent. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, City Clerk Hooper and City Treasurer Pygatt. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (AGENDA ITEMS ONLY) NONE PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE Mayor Richards asked that the agenda be re-ordered and hear the Closed Session Items first. CLOSED SESSION Item #6: Closed Session City Attorney Thever stated with respect to every item of business to be discussed in Closed Session pursuant to Section 54956.9: • A. Conference with Legal Counsel ^ Existing Litigation ^ Name of Case: McCloud v. City of Lynwood It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to recess to Closed Session at 9:10 a.m. Councilman Rea arrived at 9:18 a.m. Council reconvened at 9:53 a.m. City Attorney Thever stated Council met on the aforementioned matters and stated: • A. No Reportable Action. Item #5: Citizen of the Month Program Mayor Richards asked that Council be included in the nomination of Citizen of the Month as well as Employee of the Month. City Manager Davis discussed the Employee of the Month Program. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to receive and file the information. Item #4: Strategic Plan & Implementation Public Works Update on the Capital Improvement Projects Public Works Director Joe Wang gave a brief overview of CIP Projects and the Civic Center Master Plan. Director Wang introduced the West Group Architects working on the Master Plan. The West Group Architects presented Council with various themes and options for a new Civic Center. Asked Council for further direction. Mayor Richards suggested using the entire area, from Martin Luther King Blvd. to the Armory as the Civic Center. Also suggested creating a "Civic Center Authority" as a separate board that would look at issues such as approaches to financing and possible new revenue streams. Assistant Public Works Director Yadi Fahardi discussed upcoming CIP Projects and distributed a list of projects and timeframes to Council. Yadi discussed the following projects: • Street Improvements • Water /Sewer Improvements • Building Improvements • Special Projects Councilman Rea stated he is opposed to any designs on median islands, and objects to any additional islands being proposed in the city, especially on Imperial Highway. Suggested more landscaping, parkway improvements and trees. Stated the lack of maintenance to maintain the medians just creates a waste of dollars and cents. Also discussed the widening of sidewalks on Long Beach Blvd. Mayor Richards stated the medians on Long Beach Blvd. are a breath of fresh air, and we also need to look into improving the aesthetics of the businesses on Long Beach Blvd. Stated we have the resources to do the work. Councilman Byrd wants fencing on medians at schools to deter people from running across the streets. Discussed the maintenance of median islands and the obstructive light standards on the sidewalk on Long Beach Blvd. Public Works Director Wang explained the reason for the standards ultimately being installed on the sidewalk on Long Beach Blvd. Mayor Richards asked staff to contact Edison with regard to the south end of the city. Stated it is extremely dark on the south end at night. Mayor Richards also discussed possibly using stamped concrete instead of landscaping to alleviate the problem of weeds and shrubbery. Councilman Rea suggested applying for exemptions through ADA to repair sidewalks. Yadi discussed reconstruction and the ADA rules. Councilman Rea asked about delays and how long is our warranty on streets after construction. Yadi stated the warranty is one year. Councilman Rea asked if the city could get a 2-year extension instead of 1 (one). Councilman Rea also discussed current failed streets and potholes in streets constructed two (2) years ago. Councilman Rea will provide staff with a list of streets in disrepair. Recreation & Community Services Staff distributed to Council drafts of the redesigned city Anniversary Logo. ADJOURNMENT After discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to adjourn the meeting until Wednesday, April 25, 2001. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL23.2001 C LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 25, 2001 CONTINUED MEETING OF APRIL 23. 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Adjourned Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 8:20. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Rea, Reyes, Sanchez, and Richards answered the joint roll call for all agencies. Also present were City Manager Davis, and City Clerk Hooper. City Treasurer Pygatt was absent. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (AGENDA ITEMS ONLY) NONE PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE CLOSED SESSION Subsequent Need Item: 1. Update Concerning Claims 2. Bass v. City of Lynwood It was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes to hear the two Subsequent Need.ltems with the adjourned Items from April 23, 2001. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Closed Session Items from April 23, 2001: • Bass v. City of Lynwood • Reconsideration of Issue w/ McCloud Case It was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to recess to Closed Session at 8:50 a.m. Council reconvened at 9:00 a.m. Mayor Richards stated there was No Reportable Action for any of these items. Assistant City Attorney Calsada arrived at 9:00 a.m. Item #4: Strategic Plan and Implementation PUBLIC WORKS Public Works Director Joe Wang and Assistant Public Works Director Yadi Fahardi continued their presentation on Capital Improvement Projects (CIP's). • CIP PROJECTS Yadi presented Council with a brief overview of the following CIP Projects: o Natatorium Update o Ham Park Teen Center o Water Main Upgrade o Teen Square Project o Water Tower Project Public Works Director Wang stated that Public Works is moving more aggressively with the CIP Projects. Stated several streets have been designed and are ready to advertise, but the problem is that Public Works does not have an adequate number of Inspectors for the projects. Councilman Rea asked Joe to bring back a recommendation for Council to~ consider hiring an additional inspector. City Manager Davis asked for permission to negotiate with private contractors for a temporary inspector. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 a.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL25.2001 C LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 25, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 9:10 a.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Rea, Reyes, Sanchez, and Richards answered the joint roll call for all agencies. Also present were City Manager Davis, and City Clerk Hooper. City Treasurer Pygatt was absent. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (AGENDA ITEMS ONLY) NONE PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE Item #4: Strategic Plan and Implementation PUBLIC WORKS Update on Capital Improvement Projects Mayor Richards stated Council and staff would tour the Natatorium Construction Project and the Teen Center Project. It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to recess for the tour at 9:10 a.m. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to recess the meeting for a tour of the Natatorium and Teen Center and adjourn the meeting at 10:30 a.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL25.2001 C .~ ~ LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 30, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 8:15 a.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Reyes, Sanchez and Richards answered the Joint Roll Call for all agencies. . Councilman Rea was absent. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, City Clerk Hooper and City Treasurer Pygatt. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE Councilman Rea arrived at 8:17 a.m. CLOSED SESSION Item #5: Closed Session City Attorney Thever stated that with respect to every item of business to be discussed in the Joint Closed Session pursuant to Section 54956.9: • 5a. Conference with Legal Counsel -Existing Litigation ^ Case: Karla Cortes v. City of Lynwood Mayor Richards stated that there were incidents over the weekend that they would like a briefing on from the Sheriff's Department and asked that Subsequent Need Item: Law Enforcement Debriefing. It was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to hear the Subs~auent Need Item: • 5b. Subsequent Need Item: Law Enforcement Debriefing ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEN BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE It was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to recess to a Joint Closed Session at 8:18 a.m. Council reconvened at 8:40 a.m. City Attorney Thever stated Council met on the aforementioned matters and stated on: • 5a. No Reportable Action • 5b. No Reportable Action .-. Item #4: Strategic Plan and Implementation PUBLIC WORKS Lynwood Shines - 2001 Public Works Director Joe Wang presented Council with an overview of the 2001 Lynwood Shines Program. The presentation covered the following topics: • City-Wide Clean-Up Campaign o Divide city into 13 areas o Outreach Education Program o Publicity & Community Education o Clean-up and Beautification o Residential Participation o Time Frames o Clean-up Schedule PUBLIC SAFETY -SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DUI Checkpoints Sergeant Jaen and Deputy Mike Metcalf presented Council with an overview of the Checkpoint Program. Stated these checkpoints are to increase public awareness, cite and arrest violators, reduce traffic collisions, and make streets safe. The Checkpoints encompass the r'ollowing: • Personnel/Staffing 0 2 Sergeants 0 20 Deputies 0 6 Motorcycle Officers 0 2 Secretaries 0 6 PCOs/CSO's 0 6 Volunteers • Equipment o Motor home o Sheriff Cars and Motorcycles o Towing Company o Transportation Van o Outside lights o Orange & traffic cones (300) o Traffic Signs o Equipment Trailer First Quarter Statistics Month DUI Licenses Impounds January 6 49 56 February 6 75 82 March 1 99 100 April 3 85 90 2 • Cost: $13, 000.00 • Staffing: 36 Sworn Officers, 6 Civilians • Revenue Back to City: $7,800 • 90% recovery of court fines refunded to city • 5% to city received from towing companies Public Scale Presentation Lt. Herek presented Council with information pertaining to public and portable scales. Lt. Herek listed the pros and cons of public versus portable scales. Public Scales One currently within 5-mile radius Very accurate + Or - 250 lbs. Higher fines Portable Scales Certified regularly weighs'/z axle at a time + Or- 1,000 Cost $1,500 per scale The next discussion was Fixed versus Portable Scales: Fixed (Commercial) Scales + Or - 250 lbs. 1999 court fines:- $1,323 Cite for 8,750 overweight (Very accurate) Portable Scales + Or -1,000 Ibs 1999 court fines: $640 Cite for 8,000 overweight Councilman Rea stated that Council needs to revisit the current sign ordinance relating to trucks and discussed the fines for overweight trucks on the highway. Councilman Rea left at 9:50 a.m. PUBLIC WORKS Imperial Highway Project Public Works Director Wang discussed the design and median islands fbr the Imperial Highway project. Discussed letter sent to school district regarding the proposed fence in front of the front entrance of the school. Received no response from the school district. Distributed to Council a cost estimate for the redesign. Discussed upcoming bid opening for the project. Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez discussed the need for a fence on Imperial Highway and stated that the landscaping will last longer with a fence on the median island. Mayor Richards discussed improving the area at Imperial and Norton. Director Wang also discussed pavement lights for the Bullis Road crosswalk. City Manager Davis discussed the $50,000 reward recently offered by the Governor for information leading to the conviction of the murder of Gary Beverly, and the ceremony still pending regarding the renaming of the street in front of the high school. Public Works Director Wang stated that the sign has been prepared and is ready for installation. Mayor Richards requested staff move forward with the street dedication and set a date for the ceremony. COUNCIL ORALS Mayor Richards asked that the banners along Cesar Chavez Lane be replaced. Mayor Richards also asked if the city could prepare cable television public service announcements regarding basic driving rules of the road. Suggested using Highway Safety monies for 30-60 second commercials as a public safety measure. Councilman Byrd discussed the car pool lane on the I-105 freeway and the fact that people are not adhering to the rules of the car pool lane. ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Byrd, seconded by Councilman Reyes and carried to adjourn the meeting at 10:10 a.m. Paul H. Richards, II, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APRIL30.2001 C 4 LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 1, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Regular Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 6:15 p.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Rea, Reyes, Sanchez, and Richards answered the roll call. Also present were City Manager Davis, City Attorney Thever, City Clerk Hooper and City Treasurer Pygatt. City Clerk Hooper announced that the agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS A) AARP B) SHAN POWELL FURRILO It was moved by Councilmen Rea, seconded by Councilmen Byrd and carried to approve the Presentations and Proclamations. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) NONE PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Leroy Guillory - Stated a neighbor located at 3952 Platt Ave. had to pay from her own pocket to have the trees around her home trimmed, because there was a car burned by her home and it damaged the trees. Also stated that he feels that the residents of Lynwood need more help and attention. Irene Garcia -Stated that for months she has not received the Lynwood Press Newspaper at her home would like an update on this issue. Also stated she would like for Council to take into consideration in having the street crew become full- time employees so the City can always look nice and clean. It was moved by councilmen Byrd, seconded by Councilmen Reyes and carried to recess to L.R.A., L.I.I., and L.P.F.A. Item# 9: MINUTE OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS: It was moved by Councilmen Reyes, seconded Councilmen Byrd and carried to approve the minutes. Special Meeting, April 16, 2001 PUBLIC HEARINGS It was moved by Councilmen Reyes, seconded by Councilmen Byrd and carried to open the public hearing. Item# 10 PROPOSED VACATION OF THE FIRST ALLEY WEST OF ALEXANDER AVENUE, NORTH OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY Alan Schook -Stated he is requesting Council to approve the Alley Vacation of West of Alexander Avenue and North of Imperial Highway behind his shop. It was moved by Councilmen Reyes, seconded by Councilmen Byrd and carried to close the public hearing. It was moved by Councilmen Reyes, seconded by Councilmen Byrd to adopt Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2001.049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE THE FIRST ALLEY WEST OF ALEXANDER AVENUE, NORTH OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 12197 IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 227, PAGES 37- 38 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER ROLL CALL: AYES: BYRD, REA, NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS It was moved by Councilmen Reyes, seconded by Councilmen Byrd to close the public hearing. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Council or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Councilmen Rea stated he objects to Item# 13 the Ordinance. Councilmen Reyes stated he agrees with Councilmen Rea on Item# 13. Councilman Rea stated that the Agenda needs to be more clear on the Items. Mayor Richards continued Items # 11, 12, and 13. It was moved by Councilmen Reyes, seconded by Councilmen Byrd to adopt Resolutions and receive and file the following: Item# 14 BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP REVOLVING LOAN FUND GRANT To inform the Lynwood City Council that the City of Lynwood application for the Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund Grant has been selected as one of the forty-six (46) communities in the Country that will receive this grant from the.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Item# 15 WARRANT REGISTER RESOLUTION NO. 2001.050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ALLOWING AND APPROVING THE DEMANDS AND WARRANTS THEREFORE ROLL CALL: AYES: BYRD, REA, REYES, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE DISCUSSION ITEMS NONE CLOSED SESSION NONE ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Reyes, seconded by Councilman Byrd and carried to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Paul H. Richards, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MAY 7, 2001 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a Special Meeting at 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 10:15 a.m. Mayor Richards presiding. Councilmen Byrd, Rea, Sanchez, and Richards answered the roll call. Councilmen Reyes was absent. Also present were City Manager Davis, Assistant City Attorney Calsada, City Clerk Hooper and City Treasurer Pygatt. City Clerk Hooper announced that the agenda had been posted in accordance with the Brown Act. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) NONE PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE Item# 5: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PROJECT NO. 5-5138 BULLIS ROAD CONTRACT AWARD It was moved by Councilmen Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez to adopt Resolution: RESOLUTION N0.2001.051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AWARDING A CONTRACT TO SHAWNAN CORP. FOR THE BULLIS ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PROJECT NO. 5-5138 (FEDERAL PROJECT NO. 07-LA-0-LYN DBL-5250 (003)), AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO MAKE THE NECESSARY FUNDS APPROPRIATION AND TRANSFER. ROLL CALL: AYES: BYRD, REA, SANCHEZ, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE Item# 6: HAM PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PROJECT NO. 05-5205 The Ham Park Youth Center plans have been approved. This project is ready for Construction. Staff anticipates construction to start by mid June 2001. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez, seconded by Councilmen Byrd to receive and file the attached status report on the Ham Park Youth Center, and to also bring back further information at the next Council meeting regarding fixing, repairing and etc. for the Abbott House (Ham House). Item# 4: STRATEGIC PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC WORKS: Alternative to Address Conditions of Illegal Constructions Bullis Road Improvement Project Ham Park Improvement Project Code Enforcement Manager Kathy Beal gave the Council a brief presentation on the Alternative to Address Conditions of Illegal Constructions. Councilmen Rea stated that he is not happy with the Code Enforcement Officers he believes they are not completing there job tasks. Community Development Director Gary Chicots stated he would bring back to Council more information and guidelines. ADJOURNMENT Having no further discussion, it was moved by Councilmen Byrd, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez and carried to adjourn the meeting at 12:10 p.m. Paul H. Richards, Mayor Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk DATE: May 15, 2001 TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE AGENCY HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, Executive Director/City Manager BY: Gary D. Chicots, Community Development Director Shirley wolf, Project Manager SUBJECT: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CHILDCARE/JOB TRAINING CENTER WITH DOMINO NURSERY CENTER, INC. ON THE AGENCY OWNED SITES AT ATLANTIC AVENUE AND JOSEPHINE AVENUE. Pur ose: To conduct a joint public hearing between the Lynwood City Council (the "City") and the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") on a request to consider approval of a Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the Agency and Domino's Nursery Center, Inc. ("Development") for the development of a child care center and a job training facility. Facts: On January 29, 2001 staff received a request for rehabilitation assistance from Domino's Nursery Center, Inc. for a site on Imperial Highway. This site subsequently burned down do to a vagrant population occupying the building. Because of this fire damage on February 2, 2001, Domino's did not close escrow. 2. On February 28, 2001 staff received a proposal to construct a childcare development center and job training/development center on two Agency owned properties across the street from each other at the corner of Atlantic and Josephine Avenues, adjacent to the I-105 freeway. 3. In April staff presented this project to the Redevelopment Committee. At that time the Committee and the Executive Director of the Agency directed Staff and the Agency's Attorney to draft a Disposition and Development Agreement. The Redevelopment Committee will review the Draft DDA on Thursday, May 10, 2001, however at the writing of this report that recommendation is not known. 4. The Agency will have the opportunity to review the concept of this proposal on Monday, May 14, 2001. Again, at the writing of this report the recommendation is not known. Summary: The proponent is proposing to construct two separate building on the excess CalTrans property the Agency owns adjacent to the freeway to the south of the 1- 105 on Atlantic Avenue. On the east comer the proposal shows a 4,214 square foot building which will house the Job Training Facility. The construction cost for this building is anticipated to be $514,639. The second building is proposed on the west side of Atlantic Avenue to house the Child care facility. This building is anticipated to cost $760,461. The total construction proposed is $1,275,100. Domino's Nursery Center, Inc. has secured financing for 60% of the project. The proponent is requesting that the Agency sell them the sites for $1.00 each and finance the remaining 40% of the cost of construction or $510,041.00. (Proposal attached) H:/WORDFILE/REDEV/SWOLF/domino's nursery DDA eaExve rrssa j ~~ The attached DRAFT Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) contemplates selling the sites to Domino's Nursery Center, Inc. for $1.00 each and financing with a low interest loan the remaining construction cost, approximately $510,000.00. Although the Agency has committed most of the Redevelopment Tax Increment funds to other project, staff has been looking into the possibility of reprogramming the funds from the Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program as a funding source for this project. Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests that the City Council and Agency open the Public Hearing and continue the Public Hearing to the next regular meeting. H:NIIORDFILE/REDEVlSWOLF/domino's nursery DDA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND DOMINO'S NURSERY CENTER, INC. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CHILD CARE CENTER AND A JOB TRAINING FACILITY. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for Lynwood Project Area "A" ("Redevelopment Plan"), was duly approved and adopted on July 3, 1973 by Ordinance No. 945 and subsequently amended on December 27, 1973 by Ordinance No. 960, on August 19, 1975 by Ordinance No. 990, on June 1, 1976 by Ordinance No. 1000, on December 7, 1976 by Ordinance No. 1010, on December 16, 1980 by Ordinance No. 1111, on July 19, 1988 by Ordinance No. 88-1308 and on March 20, 2001 by Ordinance No. 1504; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is engaged in activities necessary to execute and implement the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("Redevelopment Project") in the City of Lynwood and in order to do so the Agency proposes to enter into a "DDA" with Domino's Nursery Center, Inc. for the development of a Job Training Facility and a Childcare Center; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to consider the disposition of the Agency property in connection with the development of the Site by the Developer; and WHEREAS, the proposed DDA amendments contain all the provisions, terms, conditions and obligations required by state and local law; and WHEREAS, the Developer possesses the qualifications necessary to insure development of the Site proposed in accordance with the purposes and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Agency and City Council of the City of Lynwood have held a duly noticed joint public hearing on the proposed DDA and related agreements; WHEREAS, the Agency and the City Council have duly considered the proposed DDA and believe that development pursuant thereto is in the best interest of the City of Lynwood and in furtherance of the goals and objectives of the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency to reduce blight in the Project Area; NOW, THEZEFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lynwood and the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency as follows: Section 1. The Agency and City Council hereby find and determine that the development of the Site pursuant to the DDA is in the best interest of the City of Lynwood and the health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law. tion 2. The Agency and City Council hereby find and determine that the development of the Site pursuant to the proposed DDA is necessary to effectuate the purpose of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project. ction .The Agency and the City Council hereby find and determine that the development of the Site pursuant to the proposed DDA will be consistent with the development permitted at that location by the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance. e ti n 4. The Agency has held a joint public hearing with the City Council and has received, heard and considered all oral and written objections to the proposed DDA and to the actions connected therewith, and hereby overrules all such oral and written objections. H:/WORDFILE/REDEV/SWOLF/domino's nursery DDA tin The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized to execute the Amended and Restated DDA. tin .The Executive Director of the Agency, or his designee, is hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency and the City, to sign all documents necessary and appropriate to carry out and implement the DDA, and to administer and implement the Agency's obligations, responsibilities and duties to be performed under such document. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15T" day of May 2001. ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney PAUL H. RICHARS, II, MAYOR Ralph Davis, City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Gary D. Chicots, Director Community Development H:/WORDFILE/REDEV/SWOLF/domino's nursery DDA ,..... RESOLUTION NO. -.., A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMETNAL FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND DOMINO'S NURSERY CENTER, INC. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CHILD CARE CENTER AND A JOB TRAINING FACILITY. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") wishes to consider the approval of the Disposition ("DDA") and Development Agreement by and between the Agency and Domino's Nursery Center, Inc., (the "Developer") for the disposition of certain real property located at Atlantic Avenue and Josephine Avenue, adjacent to the I-105 freeway. WHEREAS, a Project Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the 1980 Amendment to Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("1980 EIR"); and WHEREAS, the development advances the goals of the 1980 Amendment to Lynwood Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("1980 Amendment"} described in the 1980 EIR which goals are to (1) arrest the decline and decay and the spread of blight throughout the project area, (2) restore and revitalize existing residential, commercial and industrial areas to viable centers serving community and regional needs, and (3) stimulate and attract private investment thereby improving the City's economic health, employment opportunities and tax base; and WHEREAS, the 1980 EIR addresses the environmental impacts of the development pursuant to the proposed DDA; and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared an Initial Study and found and determined that a subsequent EIR is not needed because none of the following condition of Section 15162 of Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA Guidelines") has occurred: Subsequent changes are proposed in the project which will require important revisions to the 1980 EIR due to the involvement of new significant impacts not considered in the 1980 EIR; and Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances unci,:r the project was undertaken due to the involvement of the new significant impacts not covered in the 1980 EIR; and New information of substantial importance to the project has become available. NOW, THEREFORE, the Lynwood City Council hereby resolves as follows: e tion 1. The redevelopment of the Site provided for by the DDA is covered by the 1980 EIR which serves as the Final Environmental Impact Report for the entire Amendment, which Amendment constitutes the "Project". e tin 2. The redevelopment of the Site provided for by the DDA was considered in the 1980 EIR as part of the Project. tion 3. The 1980 EIR was considered prior to the approval of the DDA. The Agency hereby finds: the redevelopment pursuant to the proposed DDA is within the scope of the 1980 Amendment previously approved; the effects of the redevelopment pursuant to the proposed Final Environmental Impact Report H:/WORDFILE/REDEV/SWOLF/domino's nursery DDA `„~ "'^ together with all other development. All feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed in the previous Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project are incorporated in this Development. No new information of substantial importance to the Project has become available. The final Environmental Impact report, therefore, is determined to be adequate to serve as the environmental impact report for the Development and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. Section 4. Applicable mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into this Development, which mitigate any potential significant environmental impacts thereof. Section 5. The Final Impact Report incorporates certain mitigation measures which are to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment, and the Agency hereby adopts the following program for reporting and monitoring the implementation of such mitigation measures pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6: A. The Developer selected by the Agency shall enter into an Agreement with the Agency to submit all plans and specifications for the Development to the Agency for its approval, at which time the Agency shall review the plans and specifications for compliance with such mitigation measures as are the responsibility of the Developer; B. The Agency shall comply with all requirements of the City of Lynwood (the "City") and all public agencies having jurisdiction in any demolition and construction of public works are to be constructed by the Agency; C. The Agency will report to the City Council not less than annually on the implementation of the mitigation measures and make any recommendations it deems necessary to further implement said measures, such report to be included in the Agency's annual report pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33089.5 and 33080.4; D. The City hereby authorizes and directs that a Notice of Determination with respect to the acquisition and development of the Site pursuant to the proposed DDA, and all other Agency actions taken in furtherance thereof, be filed. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of May 2001. ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney PAUL H. RICHARDS, II, MAYOR Ralph Davis, City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Gary D. Chicots, Director Community Development H:IWORDFILE/REDEV/SWOLF/domino's nursery DDA ,.~- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND DOMINO'S NURSERY CENTER, INC. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CHILD CARE CENTER AND A JOB TRAINING FACILITY. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for Lynwood Project Area "A" ("Redevelopment Plan"), was duly approved and adopted on July 3, 1973 by Ordinance No. 945 and subsequently amended on December 27, 1973 by Ordinance No. 960, on August 19, 1975 by Ordinance No. 990, on June 1, 1976 by Ordinance No. 1000, on December 7, 1976 by Ordinance No. 1010, on December 16, 1980 by Ordinance No. 1111, on July 19, 1988 by Ordinance No. 88-1308 and on March 20, 2001 by Ordinance No. 1504; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") is engaged in activities necessary to execute and implement the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("Redevelopment Project") in the City of Lynwood and in order to do so the Agency proposes to approve a Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") with Domino's Nursery Center, Inc. (Developer) for the development of a Job Training Facility and Childcare Center on the two Agency owned sites on Atlantic Avenue adjacent to the I-105 freeway ("Site"), and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to consider the disposition of the Agency property in connection with the development of the Site by the Developer; and WHEREAS, the proposed DDA contains all the provisions, terms, conditions and obligations required by state and local law; and WHEREAS, the Developer possesses the qualifications necessary to insure development of the Site proposed in accordance with the purposes and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Agency and City Council of the City of Lynwood have held a duly noticed joint public hearing on the proposed DDA and related agreements; WHEREAS, the Agency and the City Council have duly considered the proposed DDA and believe that development pursuant thereto is in the best interest of the City of Lynwood and in furtherance of the goals and objectives of the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency to reduce blight in the Project Area; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lynwood and the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency as follows: ection 1. The Agency and City Council hereby find and determine that the development of the Site pursuant to the DDA is in the best interest of the City of Lynwood and the health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law. Section 2. The Agency and City Council hereby find and determine that the development of the Site pursuant to the proposed DDA is necessary to effectuate the purpose of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project. e tion .The Agency and the City Council hereby find and determine that the development of the Site pursuant to the proposed DDA will be consistent with the development permitted at that location by Lynwood Zoning Ordinance. Section 4. The Agency has held a joint public hearing with the City Council and has received, heard and considered all oral and written objections to the H:/WORDFILE/REDEV/SWOLF/domino's nursery DDA ~, proposed DDA and to the actions connected therewith, and hereby overrules all such oral and written objections. e ion The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby authorized to execute the DDA. Section 6. The Executive Director of the Agency, or his designee, is hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency and the City, to sign all documents necessary and appropriate to carry out and implement of the DDA, and to administer and implement the Agency's obligations, responsibilities and duties to be performed under such document. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15T" day of May 2001. ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Agency Counsel PAUL H. RICHARS, II, CHAIRMAN Ralph Davis, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Gary D. Chicots, Director Community Development H:NVORDFILE/REDEVlSWOLF/domino's nursery DDA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMETNAL FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND DOMINO'S NURSERY CENTER, INC. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CHILD CARE CENTER AND A JOB TRAINING FACILITY. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") wishes to consider the approval of a Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the Agency and Domino's Nursery Center, Inc. (the "Developer") for the disposition of certain real property located at and around Atlantic Avenue and adjacent to the south side of the I-105 freeway (the "Site"); and WHEREAS, a Project Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the 1980 Amendment to Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("1980 EIR"); and WHEREAS, the development advances the goals of the 1980 Amendment to Lynwood Redevelopment Project Area "A" ("1980 Amendment") described in the 1980 EIR which goals are to (1) arrest the decline and decay and the spread of blight throughout the project area, (2) restore and revitalize existing residential, commercial and industrial areas to viable centers serving community and regional needs, and (3) stimulate and attract private investment thereby improving the City's economic health, employment opportunities and tax base; and WHEREAS, the 1980 EIR addresses the environmental impacts of the development pursuant to the proposed DDA; and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared an Initial Study and found and determined that a subsequent EIR is not needed because none of the following condition of Section 15162 of Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA Guidelines") has occurred: Subsequent changes are proposed in the project which will require important revisions to the 1980 EIR due to the involvement of new significant impacts not considered in the 1980 EIR; and Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under the project was undertaken due to the involvement of the new significant impacts not covered in the 1980 EIR; and New information of substantial importance to the project has become available. NOW, THEREFORE, the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency hereby resolves as follows: e tin 1. The redevelopment of the Site provided for by the DDA is covered by the 1980 EIR which serves as the Final Environmental Impact Report for the entire Amendment, which Amendment constitutes the "Project". ~ tin .The redevelopment of the Site provided for by the DDA was considered in the 1980 EIR as part of the Project. Section 3. The 1980 EIR was considered prior to the approval of the DDA. The Agency hereby finds: the redevelopment pursuant to the proposed DDA is within the scope of the 1980 Amendment previously approved; the effects of the redevelopment pursuant to the proposed Final Environmental Impact Report H:NVORDFILE/REDEV/SWOLF/domino's nursery DDA .~•, .-. together with all other development. All feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed in the previous Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project are incorporated in this Development. No new information of substantial importance to the Project has become available. The final Environmental Impact report, therefore, is determined to be adequate to serve as the environmental impact report for the Development and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. Section 4. Applicable mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into this Development which mitigate any potential significant environmental impacts thereof. Section 5. The Final Impact Report incorporates certain mitigation measures which are to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment, and the Agency hereby adopts the following program for reporting and monitoring the implementation of such mitigation measures pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6: A. The Developer selected by the Agency shall enter into an Agreement with the Agency to submit all plans and specifications for the Development to the Agency for its approval, at which time the Agency shall review the plans and specifications for compliance with such mitigation measures as are the responsibility of the Developer; B. The Agency shall comply with all requirements of the City of Lynwood {the "City") and all public agencies having jurisdiction in any demolition and construction of public works are to be constructed by the Agency; C. The Agency will report to the City Council of the City not less than annually on the implementation of the mitigation measures and make any recommendations it deems necessary to further implement said measures, such report to be included in the Agency's annual report pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33089.5 and 33080.4; D. The City hereby authorizes and directs that a Notice of Determination with respect to the acquisition and development of the Site pursuant to the proposed DDA, and all other Agency actions taken in furtherance thereof, be filed. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of May 2001. ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Agency Counsel PAUL H. RICHARS, II, CHAIRMAN Ralph Davis, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Gary D. Chicots, Director Community Development H:/WORDFILE/REDEV/SWOLF/domino's nursery DDA ~. DATE: May 15, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager ~~•-~%~~`~~ Gary Chicots, Community Development Director BY: Grant Taylor, Senior Planner & Mike Wagner, Consulting Planner SUB7ECT: General Plan Amendment No. 2000-02: Housing Element PURPOSE To conduct a public hearing in order to consider General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 2000-02, to adopt a new Housing Element for Submission to the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD). BACKGROUND Pursuant to Assembly Bill AB 1741, cities and counties were required to submit Housing Elements to HCD no later than December 31, 2000. The Lynwood Planning Commission approved GPA 2000-02 on October 10, 2000 and staff promptly forwarded the document to HCD for review. On December 4, 2000, Planning Division staff received the comment letter from HCD. The Housing Element was not certified and a list of revisions and questions were provided to staff. The consultant and staff have addressed all concerns identified by HCD. If approved by the City Council, the document will be forwarded back to HCD. If certified by HCD, the City of Lynwood would be in full compliance and the effects of Senate Bill SB910 would be "moot." I. SUMMARY The Housing Element includes development of 170 units as follows: (1) private development (65 units), (2) emergency shelter (20 units), (3) RDA new development (60 units), (4) RDA senior (25 units); the rehabilitation of 700 residential units by (1) code enforcement (600 units), and (2) HOME rehab (100 units), financing programs for housing including (1) HOME mortgage (20 units), and (2) HOME purchase (10 units); the conservation program (200 units); and housing programs for fair housing, public information and annual review of the housing element. II. INTRODUCTION A. BACKGROUND The Housing Element consists of the identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs as well as statements of goals, policies, and implementing strategies, for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing within the City of Lynwood. Section 65302(c) of the California Government Code requires every county and city in the State to include a housing element as part of their adopted general plans. In stipulating the content of this element, Article 10.6 of the Government Code indicates that the element shall consist of "an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing." This legislation further states that the element "shall identify adequate sites for housing, including rental housing, factory-built housing, and mobile homes, and shall make adequat provision for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the communi~jr." AGE~~llA H:\WORDFILE\PLANNING\STAFFRP71gpa2000-02.housingelement.doc 1 Housing Element Staff Report May 15, 2001 Page 2 B. PURPOSE AND CONTENT This updated housing element has been prepared in compliance with Section 53202(c) and Article 10.6 of the Government Code. It examines the City of Lynwood's housing needs as they exist today, and projects future housing needs. It sets forth statements of community goals, objectives and policies concerning those needs, and it includes a housing program that responds to current and future needs within the limitations posed by available resources. The housing program details a 5-year schedule of actions the community is undertaking or plans to undertake to achieve its goals and objectives. Upon its adoption by the Lynwood City Council, this updated housing element will serve as a comprehensive statement of the City's housing policies and as a specific guide for program actions to be taken in support of those policies. State law recognizes that housing needs may exceed available resources and, therefore, does not require that the City's quantified objectives be identical to the identified housing needs. This recognition of limitations is critical during this period of uncertainties in both the public and private sectors. Fiscal resources at all governmental levels are limited and uncertain and the private marketplace is undergoing substantial change. As a result, the methods for achieving the City of Lynwood's objectives, or the ability to meet them at all, as stated today, may be less relevant tomorrow or a year from tomorrow. Therefore, it is intended that this housing element be reviewed annually and updated and modified not less than every 5 years in order to remain relevant and useful to decision-makers, the private sector, and the residents of the City. It should be pointed out that State law explicitly indicates that the City of Lynwood is not expected to spend any of its own funds carrying out the objectives of this Housing Element. It is not the City's responsibility to guarantee or ensure that the housing units that are needed to accommodate anticipated population growth are constructed. The City's obligations under State law are to: 1) provide adequate, appropriately zoned sites to meet the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community; 2) eliminate any constraints to the private development of a supply of housing to meet the needs of all economic segments of the community; and 3) otherwise facilitate the actions required of the development industry in providing an adequate supply of housing. C. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS AND PLANS The California Government Code requires internal consistency among the various elements of a general plan. Section 65300.5 of the Government Code states that the general plan and the parts and elements thereof shall comprise an integrated and internally consistent and compatible statement of goals. The update and ultimate adoption of this Housing Element for the 5 year period of 2000-2005 will make the this Housing Element Staff Report May 15, 2001 Page 3 section of the City's General Plan current. City staff has reviewed the other elements of the General Plan and has determined that this Housing Element is consistent therewith. The City will maintain this consistency as future General Plan amendments are processed by evaluating proposed amendments for consistency with all elements of the General Plan. D. PROPOSED PROJECT The Housing Element consists of the following projects: 1. Private Development Private developers are developing new single family homes for sale to residents or those choosing to live in the City. These units are being sold in the moderate income range at $180,000 to $190,000. Approximately 35 moderate homes will be developed over the next five years. Private development multi-family will also be constructed. Thirty units will be constructed in the planning period, for a total of 65 units during the next five years. 2. Emergency Shelter Investigate the feasibility of coordinating with other governmental entities, non-profit agencies and private enterprise, for the purpose of acquiring and retro-fitting an existing structure for use as "single room occupancy" housing facility for the homeless and persons in need of emergency shelter. If determined to be feasible, creation of up to 20 single room dwelling units providing housing to persons who are homeless and/or in need of temporary or emergency shelter. 3 Land Assembly/New Development This program will include, as necessary, the acquisition and assembly of land, relocation of any residents, demolition of existing structures, and the construction of new single-family owner-occupied units and new multi-family units, for all economic groups. The program will be conducted pursuant to all requirements of the California Redevelopment Law, within the jurisdiction of the Redevelopment Agency. Approximately 60 new units will be constructed and at least half will be for low and moderate income families. New single- family homes will also meet the needs of existing renters because the City desires to make homeowners out of existing renters. The City's objective is to improve the stability of the community. ~. Housing Element Staff Report May 15, 2001 Page 4 4. Redevelopment -Senior Housing This program will include the development of 25 senior units. An existing older motel will be redeveloped into senior housing. Current plans call for the combining of two motel rooms into one unit. 5. Fair Housing The City contracts with the Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach on annual basis to provide fair housing services for Lynwood residents as required by the Civil Rights Act of 1968 and the Fair Housing Act. To comply with these regulations, the City utilizes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to develop a proactive fair housing program to reduce, prevent, or eliminate housing discrimination and other barriers to equal housing based on race, color, religion, sex disability, or national origin. The Fair Housing foundation implements the policies and practices for fair housing in Lynwood and takes action on any circumstances that affect equal housing opportunities. The City refers all inquiries for these services to the Fair Housing Foundation and also maintains literature and informational brochures at City Hall that are available for public distribution. During 2000- 01, the City will discuss contract modifications with the Foundation concerning outreach services and individual testing. 6. The City Beautification Program This program incorporates code enforcement for substandard units. The program will review about 600 units per year. The primary emphasis will be to remove abandoned vehicles and unwanted debris. The annual budget for this program is $262,500. 7. Rehabilitation of Single-Family Homes The City will utilize Federal HOME Program funds to provide financial assistance to eligible owners for the rehabilitation of their properties. An estimated 100 single-family homes will be rehabilitated during the next five years. The annual allocation is $200,000. 8. Defenred Loans The City will utilize Federal HOME Program funds to provide deferred loans to eligible homeowners for rehabilitation of their property. During the next Housing Element Staff Report May 15, 2001 Page 5 five fiscal years, an estimated 20 households will be rehabilitated with $100,000 annual allocation. 9. Section 8 Rental Assistance The Los Angeles County Housing Authority currently administers the Section 8 Rental Assistance program. As of January 1998 a total of 122,043 households are on the waiting list for Section 8 assistance. The County Housing Authority will apply for additional funding which will enable the Housing Authority to administer an additional certificates for families, elderly, handicapped and disabled persons over the next five. 10. Federal HOME Program The City will utilize Federal HOME Program funds to provide mortgage assistance for eligible first time homebuyers. The City will allocate approximately $100,000 on an annual basis and during the next five years approximately 20 households will be provided mortgage assistance to purchase an affordable home. 11. Purchase and Acquisition Program The City will provide an annual allocation of $100,000 in HOME Program funds to purchase and acquire vacant or underutilized property that will be rehabilitated according to minimum property standards and be made available to be purchased by low and moderate households. During the next five fiscal years, approximately 10 residential properties will be purchased and rehabilitated. 12. Home Energy Upgrade Financing Program The City will pursue the use of energy conservation measures in low- and moderate-income housing through the Home Energy Upgrade Financing Program sponsored by The Gas Company. This program supported by Fannie Mae and administered by Volt VIEWtech provides loans from $1,000 to $20,000 to be repaid up to 10 years. The loans are unsecured and the current interest rate as of August 21, 2000 is 10.75 percent. The funds may be used for central air conditioning, furnaces, window and door replacements, roofing, water heaters, fireplace inserts, insulation and other approved uses. Approximately 10 units per year are expected to be in the program. The Community Development Department will provide flyers on the program at the public counter. Program details can be obtained at 1-888- 427-07697 or at socalgas.com residentiallenergyhome/efinancing.html. Housing Element Staff Report May 15, 2001 Page 6 13. Water Conservation Program The City will pursue the use of water conservation measures in low- and moderate-income housing through a toilet replacement program. The City will replaced over 200 toilets. 14. Annual Review of Housing Element The Planning Commission and the City Council will conduct an annual review of the Housing Element Implementation schedule. The review will include the following information: a. A log of new residential development permits and completion reports; b. An update or inventory on approved projects; c. Annual estimate of population from the State Department of Finance; and d. Vacant land and zoning survey. 15. Publicity and Public Information The City will publicize and make available to residents and property owners information regarding the availability of low interest loans for property rehabilitation. The City will also continue to publicize information on the availability of grants and low-interest loans for. handicapped and elderly households. In addition, the City will continue to work with and aid private developers in expanding housing opportunities in Lynwood. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Staff has prepared an Initial Study and draft Negative Declaration which is attached. V FINDINGS The City Council should consider the following findings: That the information in the Initial Study, that the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the Housing Element has been completed in compliance with CEQA in that it contains a complete and accurate accounting of all environmental impacts and appropriate mitigation measures. Housing Element Staff Report May 15, 2001 Page 7 2. That the Housing Element was presented at the public hearing before the Planning Commission on October 10, 2000 and at the public hearing before the City Council on May 15, 2001. 3. That the Housing Element conforms to the other elements of the 1990 General Plan. 4. That adoption of the Housing Element and Draft Negative Declaration does not preclude the necessity or requirement for any further environmental review, which would normally be conducted in conjunction with project approvals under City of Lynwood environmental guidelines. 5. That the Community Development Director or his designee shall be the primary party responsible for successful completion of the mitigation measures specified in the Initial Study. 6. That Community Development Director to submit the Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development for review pursuant to law. 7. That the Secretary of the Planning Commission be directed to affix her/his signature to the resolution signifying its adoption by the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, and the Secretary, or hismer duly appointed Deputy is directed to attest thereto. VI. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 01- Attachments: Resolution 01- Draft Negative Declaration Initial Study Housing Element RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED HOUSING ELEMENT AND APPROVING THE ACCOMPANYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WHEREAS, Section 65300 et. seq. of the California Government Code authorizes cities and counties to prepare long-range, comprehensive guides known as General Plans; and whereas, the City of Lynwood adopted an Updated General Plan in 1990 including the Housing Element; and WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood desires to update its Housing Element; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2000 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and advertised public hearings to receive oral and written testimony relative to the Housing Element and Draft Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, draft Housing Element was submitted to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for the required 45 day review, and WHEREAS, HCD has submitted its response, and afl of HCD's comments have been addressed, and WHEREAS, on May 15, 2001 the City Council held a duly noticed and advertised public hearings to receive oral and written testimony relative to the Housing Element and Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the City Council has sufficiently considered all testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination relative to the Housing Element and the Draft Negative Declaration, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lynwood as follows: Section 1. The City Council HEREBY FINDS and DETERMINES, after reviewing and considering the information in the Initial Study, that the Negative Declaration prepared for the Housing Element has been completed in compliance with CEQA in that it contains a complete and accurate accounting of all environmental impacts and appropriate mitigation measures. Section 2. City Council HEREBY APPROVES and ADOPTS the Housing Element as presented at the public hearing of May 15, 2001. Section 3. The City Council FURTHER DECLARES that the Housing Element conforms to the other elements of the 1990 General Plan. RESOLUTION NO. MAY 15, 2001 Section 4. The City Council DECLARES that adoption of the Housing Element and Negative Declaration does not preclude the necessity or requirement for any further environmental review, which would normally be conducted in conjunction with project approvals under City of Lynwood environmental guidelines. Section 5. The City Council FURTHER DECLARES that the Community Development Director or his designee shall be the primary party responsible for successful completion of the mitigation measures specified in the Initial Study. Section 8. The City Council directs the Community Development Director to resubmit the Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development for pursuant to law. Section 7. The Secretary of the City Council is hereby directed to affix heNhis signature to this resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Lynwood, and the Secretary, or his/her duly appointed Deputy is directed to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 2001, by the City Council of the City of Lynwood. MAYOR ATTEST: l~ ,City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood on the 15th day of May, 2001, by the following roll call vote as the same appears on file and of record in the office of the Secretary. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DATE: May 15, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager ~ .-~`~-~^`~~ ' Gary Chicots, Community Development Director BY: Grant Taylor, Senior Planner SUB7ECT: Appeal No. 2001-02: Request to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31, EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Lynwood. PURPOSE To conduct a public hearing in order to consider Appeal No. 2001-02, a request to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission to Approve Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; applications to change the zoning at Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial); and approve a 2,890 square foot expansion to the EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall at 3351 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. BACKGROUND On March 19, 2001, the Planning Division and City Clerk's OfFce received Appeal No. 2001- 02, arequest to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on March 13, 2001, January 9, 2001 and December 12, 2000 on the above-identified applications. On March 13, 2001, the Planning Commission approved two (2) applications submitted by the business owner of the EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall. The Planning Commission approved Zone change No 2000-03, to change the zoning for the property known as Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial). In addition, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 that provided approval of the following: a) Expand the existing restaurant and dance hall by 2,890 square feet; and b) Remove the nonconforming status of the dance hall land use; and c) Remove the nonconforming status of the alcoholic beverage license. The conditional use permit only needs Planning Commission approval, however, a zone change is an ordinance and requires approval from the City Council. If the City Council does not adopt the zone change ordinance, the conditional use permit is null and void. On April 17, 2001 the City Council accepted public testimony and continued the item. The subject property is located at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard within a CB-1 zone and the business establishment currently totals approximately 14,779 square feet. The addition would bring the total floor area to 17,816 square feet. The business has the following active licenses: • City of Lynwood Business License • Dance Hall & Dance Club Permit • Live Entertainment Permit - '" • Vending & Coin Operated Machines Permit .AGEN7.)A ITEM • Alcoholic Beverage Control License ~ ~ ` H:\WORDFILE\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\cup.zc.elfarallan.cc.doc 1 There is no record of a conditional use permit for the business. Conditional use permits are required for dance halls and the sale of alcoholic beverages. City Council approval is required for live entertainment permits and no resolution or minute order is on file. The Planning Commission approved a security plan that must be entered into between the business owner and the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department. The security plan would not only address the parking area of the business, but would require security of a two (2) block radius around the perimeter of Lynwood Plaza. Such security plan would restrict ingress and egress on residential streets and would force patrons to exit the property on Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. The business owner has agreed to contract with the Sheriff Department for the life of the conditional use permit to provide uniformed Deputies in Lynwood Plaza and surrounding neighborhoods. Security inside the establishment would is provided by a private firm. The conditional use permit contains twenty-three (23) conditions of approval with specific time frames to complete such conditions. DISCUSSION Lynwood Municipal Code (LMC) Section 25-7(b) identifies permitted uses within the CB-1 zone. Dance halls or nightclubs are not a permitted use, therefore, the business is nonconforming. LMC Section 25-7.2(c) identifies prohibited uses and states that any business, use or institution that is specifically authorized in other zones is prohibited in the CB-1 zone. LMC Section 25-10.1(f)(1) identifies dance halls as permitted subject to a conditional use permit within the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone, therefore, dance halls are prohibited in the CB-1, C-2 and C-2A zones. The Lynwood General Plan Land Use Map designates the property as commercial. The zone change from CB-1 to C-3 is consistent with the General Plan. There are several issues involving the zone change request. Lynwood Plaza consists of eight (8) separate property owners. EI Farallon is part of a large multiple tenant building. It would not make good planning sense to only designate EI Farallon as C-3. The entire Lynwood Plaza should be addressed as a whole. The proposal is all or nothing for Lynwood Plaza and would make at least two (2) nonconforming businesses comply with the LMC. A C-3 zoning designation would allow additional land uses that could be more intensive such as auto repair, equipment rental yard, equipment storage yard, feed and fuel yard, and dog kennels. The parking within Lynwood Plaza is sufficient to accommodate the business expansion, the building could support the occupancy load, and the business has fire sprinklers. Based on public testimony, the primary issue is activities in the parking lot and surrounding neighborhood. The comprehensive security plan and other applicable conditions of approval were developed to address those issues. The business is classified as nonconforming and subject to provisions set forth in LMC Section 25-15. Non-conforming buildings and uses are not permitted to expand or intensify the land use. In addition, there is an amortization period of ten (10) years in commercial zones in which nonconforming uses shall be abated pursuant to LMC Section 25-15.6(b). It does not appear that the City has enforced abatement schedules and there is a question if the LMC nonconforming and abatement code sections are legally enforceable. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNING\STAFFRPT\cup.zc.elfarallon.cc.doc 2 ,... ..M LMC Section 25-27 permits property owners or their authorized agents to initiate a change of zoning or general plan designation, however, the public cannot initiate a ZOA. OPTIONS The City Council has five (5) options to consider regarding this appeal. 1. Overturn the Planning Commission decision and APPROVE Appeal No. 2001-02, thereby DENYING Zone Change No. 2000-03 and DENYING Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. 2. Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and APPROVE Zone Change No. 2000-03 and APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. 3. Direct staff to perform a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow dance halls, nightclubs, etc. in the CB-1 zone subject to a conditional use permit. 4. DENY Zone Change No. 2000-03, the Conditional Use Permit and the Appeal would become "moot". 5. TAKE NO ACTION. The conditional use permit would automatically be approved pursuant to the Planning Commission actions and conditions of approval. However, Council must approve the Zone Change otherwise the conditional use permit is null and void. Approving the Appeal and denying the applications would leave anon-conforming business with no conditional use permit and no conditions to regulate the business. The result of a nonconforming business would be continued problems with cruising, loitering and other police issues. In addition, other uses within Lynwood Plaza would remain nonconforming. Support of the conditional use permit and zone change would include mandatory and specific conditions of approval in order to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of citizens working and residing in the area. Conditions would include implementing and maintaining a security plan reviewed and approved by the Sheriff Department; implementing an exterior lighting plan, parking plan, submitting a new fire sprinkler plan, and submitting for building plan check. If the applicant fails to comply with conditions of approval, the City may initiate revocation proceedings against the conditional use permit and/or the business licenses. If conditions of approval are implemented and adhered to, the required findings in LMC Section 25-25.7 could be made to approve the conditional use permit. In addition, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and appropriate mitigation measures have been required in order to reduce negative impacts to a level of insignificance. The zone would provide EI Farallon with an opportunity to be conforming and mitigate impacts on properties in the vicinity. If the City Council directs staff to draft a zoning ordinance amendment, the appeal, zone change and conditional use permit could be tabled until the Planning Commission and City Council conduct public hearings for the zoning ordinance amendment. Staff does not recommend this option. If the City Council denies the ordinance for the Zone Change, the Conditional Use Permit would become moot and the Appeal would automatically be approved. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNING\STAFFRP71cup.zc.elfarallon.cc.doc 3 Taking no action would in effect, deny the proposed expansion. The Conditional Use Permit would be approved, however, an ordinance for the Zone Change must be adopted by Council, and without the Zone Change the Conditional Use Permit is null and void. Whatever option the City Council chooses, the appropriate course of action would be to act on the Zone Change first. Action on the Zone Change dictates approval or denial of the project and other applications. SUMMARY & CONCLUSION If the City Council elects to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission, the Council would introduce the ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 first, otherwise the conditional use permit (CUP) would be null and void. The second motion would be to adopt the resolution to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. If the project is approved, the EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall would be scheduled for hearing before the Planning Commission within six (6) months to review the status of compliance with mandatory conditions of approval. If the City Council elects to support the Appeal and thereby overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, the Council would adopt the resolution to approve Appeal 2001-02. The City Council needs to carefully review and enforce the need to protect surrounding residential properties from deleterious affects of unregulated businesses. The City Council also needs to be mindful that businesses with historical enforcement problems need to be given adequate opportunity to comply before aggressive enforcement is contemplated. A zone change and conditional use permit with strict conditions is a good first step in ensuring that the business as well as residents issues are taken into consideration and resolved in a timely manner. If the applicants fail to abide by the conditions set forth in the resolution, the City can consider other options including revocation of the conditional use permit and business licenses. . RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommends for the City Council to conduct a public hearing and after considering public oral and written comments to close the public hearing and choose one of following options: 1) Adopt the resolution to APPROVE Appeal No. 2001-02 and overturn the decision of the Planning Commission, thereby denying the project. 2) Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and introduce the ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 and adopt the resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. 3) Direct staff to draft a Zoning Ordinance Amendment and thereby table the appeal, zone change and conditional use permit. 4) DENY Zone Change No. 2000-03, the Conditional Use Permit would become "moot" and the Appeal would automatically be approved. 5) Take no action. This would effectively deny the project. Although the Conditional Use Permit would automatically be approved, a zone change must be an ordinance adopted by Council. The Conditional Use Permit is null and void without the Zone Change. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNMG\STAFFRPT\cup.zc.elfarallon.cc.doc 4 Attachments: Project Profile Location Map Appeal No. 2001-02 application List of citizens providing public testimony Sheriff Report Resolution Approving Appeal No. 2001-02 Ordinance Approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 Environmental Documentation Security Plan Lighting Plan Traffic/Parking Plan Floor Plan H: \ W ORDFILEIPLANNING\STAFFRPT\cup.zc.el faral lon.cc.doc PROJECT PROFILE Zone Change 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit 2000-31 3551 Martin Luther King ]r. Boulevard 1. Source and Authority Lynwood Municipal Code (LMC) Section 25-7(b) identil=les permitted uses in the CB-1 zone; LMC Section 25-7.2(c) identifies prohibited uses in the CB-1 zone; LMC Section 25-10.a(f)(1) identifies dance halls as conditionally permitted in the C-3 zone; LMC Section 25-15 addressed nonconforming land uses and structures; LMC Section 25-25.7 sets forth required findings to approve a conditional use permit; LMC Section 25-27 addresses zone changes. 2. Property Size and Location The Lynwood Plaza is triangular in shape and bounded by Abbott Road to the north; Norton Avenue to the south; Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to the east; and San Luis Avenue to the west. The Lynwood Plaza is comprised of five (5) buildings, eight (8) parcels and totals approximately 551,890 (12.67 acres) square feet in area. Currently, EI Farallon totals 14,779 square feet. The proposed expansion is 2,890 square feet that would bring the business total to 17,816 square feet. 3. Existing Land Uses Subject: Multiple Tenants Commercial North: Single-Family Residential South: Commercial East: Commercial West: Single-Family Residential 4. Land Use Designations General Plan Zoning Subject: Commercial CB-1 (Controlled Business) North: Single-Family Resid. R-1 (Single-Family Residential) South: Commercial H-M-D (Hospital-Medical-Dental) East: Commercial CB-1, C-2 and H-M-D West: Single-Family Resid. R-1 (Single-Family Residential) 5. Site Plan Review The Site Plan Review Committee has reviewed the pro osed recommended conditions of a p project and pproval are included in Resolution 2812. 6. Zoning Enforcement History The business is currently nonconforming and has an extensive police response record. (See attached report) 7. Public Response At the last Planning Commission meetings on December i2, 2000 and January 9, 2001, extensive public testimony was provided. NL,YN_SRV 1\VOL3\WORDFILEIPLANNING\STAFFRPTcup2000-3I.doc 4 LOCATION MAP ~•~ - ''~ ^^ _ vh ti n ' 30 'rl l M ~ . ~ y^ ~`.~ N 2 r~ ^ `~ ` h n . 30 X 'l ~ N y ^ ~~ g b ~~ SD ~ X25 e~• ~~~ ~ o~ a~.~~ o ABBOTT d ~ q O ~a~ \ \ Za ~{ ~~ r ~` Z ~ ~ ~~ -I~y ~ I ~~ ROAD .aeeorr •~ f<fe a ff.[9 t f. ~~ ~ `'10UI ~ 20 ~ 30 ,lVi D w 2 -'r3J ~ ~ 20y/ e ~ ; p • , ~ ,.~~~ e7 ~ rr ~ p ~B ~ ~ /~ 31 Jpp II ~ ~ 0 h ,o r 2 ~ ~ t m M rp ~0 20~ofv j ; 3S N 69 p v u CMG 2 ~ / v res rr va> ° ~ h r v H ° a r h ~~ ~ / .. AVfNU£ h e ~ fo a , s z .c .° AVRrON 25 j S0 ~« 77m a s 1;~. 0 0 - .. \~ss 3a5 ~s o I ~ ~ ,lD , ,r, `F: `~~ CascNo. ZONE CHANGE 2000-03 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2000-31 Site Address: 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD Applicant Name: HERMELIO FRANCO [ ] 300' or [ ] 500' Radius Mali ABBp~, ~. ®~ ®5'`°' 9 ~ S,O~ ~. ~~ ~~L d -P'LOT PLA1V r~- -E S _ ~ ~ J J I ~ N ~6 ~aaft~e~ 1~~_~yn EL FA.R~L,ONNIGI~ PLP.i,n~~UC ~, n<s~cv AND RESTAU~ LUB ® B~ 8050 E. Florence Rve., Ste. Qob 3551 Martin Luther Kin Do~~nei;, ca ~o~ao g Jr. Blvd. c~bQ) ~Qa-5o~v Lynwood, Ca 90262 '°~ r t1 ~ ~ S~ `q ~ l~ ~ .~ sd" , ~a .® Q ti V Apri117, 2001 Lynwood City Council Meeting Appeal No. 2001-02 Zone Change No. 2000-03 Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 PUBLIC TESTIMONY 1) Selena Martinez (architect) Yes 2) Irene Garcia No 3) Edwin Jaciento Yes 4) Arvin Moore No 5) Helen Lustig No 6) Pat Hernandez No 7) John Graham No 8) Raul Vallejo No 9) Mrs. Morrison No 10) Ken Swift Yes 11 } Maria Lopez Yes 12) Silvaro Lopez Yes 13) Janice Hermosillo (little girl) No 14) Adriana Franco Yes 15) ??? Inaya (employee) Yes 16) Alejandro ??? (teacher) Yes 17) Juana Jimenez Yes 18) Carlos Molina Yes 19) ??? (inaudible teenager) Yes 20) Luce Rodriguez Yes 21) Ramon Rodriguez Yes 22) Ike Mbele (architect) Yes 23) Alex Zendejas Yes 24) Jim Morton Yes 25) Sal Preciado (contractor) Yes 26) Mario DeGrio? (security guard) Yes Yes = 18; No = 8 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000- 03; WITH RESPECT TO TRACT 20680, LOTS 70 and 71; ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 6191 PAGE 18 PARCELS 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008 AND 009; ALSO KNOWN AS THE LYNWOOD PLAZA AND BORDERED BY ABBOTT ROAD TO THE NORTH; MARTIN LUTHER KING, 7R. BOULEVARD TO THE WEST; SAN LUIS AVENUE TO THE EAST; AND NORTON AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, LYNWOOD CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINES) TO C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL). WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council conducted a public hearing on May 15, 2001 in order to hear Zone Change No. 2000-03; and approved such zone change; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council conducted a public hearing on April 17, 2001 in order to hear Zone Change No. 2000-03; and continued the item for thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council considered all written and oral testimony at such public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission did pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on March 13, 2001 and approved Zone Change No. 2000-03 regarding the above-identifies properties; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood did pursuant to law, conducted apublic-hearing on January 9, 2001 on a proposed Zone Change regarding the above-identified properties and the item was continued to March 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood did pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on December 12, 2000 on a proposed Zone Change with respect to the above-identified properties and continued the item; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been added to the project to reduce possible impacts to a level of insignificance; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission determined that C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zoning of these properties would be consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan. Section 1. The Lynwood City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed Zone Change will be consistent with the objectives and the development policies of the City of Lynwood. B. The proposed Zone Change will not unreasonable constrain the use of property by landowners and developers. H:\ WORDFILEIPLANNINGUtESOS\reso.elf.rallon.zc..pprove.doc 1 C. The Proposed Zone Change will not adversely affect the General Plan. D. A C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zoning designation of the subject properties would be compatible with surrounding land uses. E. A Zone Change from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial) would be consistent with the Goals and policies of the General Plan. F. At least two (2) non-conforming properties would become legal properties and business establishments. G. The rezoning would allow property owners additional land uses that could be established and operated. H. The infrastructure is adequate to support the rezoning. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determination hereby approves Zone Change No. 2000-03. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADDOPTED this day of , 2001. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney Planning Commission H:1 W ORDFILE~PLANNING~RESOSVeso.elf.nllon.u.appfove.doc PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Department 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting on the day of _ .2001. AYES: NOES: ABSTAINS: ABSENT: City Clerk, City of Lynwood STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. on file in my office and that said ordinance was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this day of 2001. City Clerk H:\W ORDFILE\PLANNINGU2ESOS1rcw.elfarallon.u.approve.doc 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-31; THEREBY DENYING APPEAL NO 2001-02 AND UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION; PERMITTING THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AND DANCE HALL AT 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council conducted a public hearing on May 15, 2001 in order to hear Appeal No. 2001-02; a request to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council conducted a public hearing on April 17, 2001 in order to hear Appeal No. 2001-02; a request to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31, the item was continued for thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council considered all written and oral testimony at such public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on March 13, 2001 conducted a public hearing on the subject applications and approved Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on January 9, 2001 conducted a public hearing and the subject application was continued for sixty (60) days to March 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, :he Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on December 12, 2000 conducted a public hearing on the subject application and the item was continued to the next regular meeting; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that the proposal may have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been added to the project to reduce possible impacts to a level of insignificance. Section 1. The Lynwood City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed project is adequate in size and shape to accommodate expansion of an existing restaurant and dance hall within an existing multiple tenant building. B. The proposed project, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the value of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety or welfare provided conditions of approval are completed and maintained. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNING~RESOS4eso.appes12001-02.appmve.doc - 1 - C. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit is in compliance with all provisions set forth in the Lynwood Municipal Code provided a Zone Change is approved. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional'Use Permit No. 2000-31 upholding the decision of the Planning Commission; and denies Appeal No. 2001-02; provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the California Building Code, the Health and Safety Code and the Los Angeles County Fire Code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review. 3. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION 4. All applicable construction permits and approvals for the 2,890 square foot expansion of the business shall be obtained within one hundred eighty (180) days from date of approval. 5. The applicant shall implement and maintain a detailed traffic circulation and parking plan within ninety (90) days of adoption by the City Council. 6. The applicant shall implement and maintain a detailed lighting plan for the parking lots areas and the exterior of the business within ninety (90) days of adoption by the City Council. 7. All parking and traffic circulation areas under EI Farallon lease shall be repaved and slurry sealed. All parking stalls shall have double-stripe delineation and provide concrete bumper stops within ninety (90) days of adoption by the City Council. 8. This conditional use permit approval is contingent upon adoption of an ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2000-03 by the Lynwood City Council. Denial of Zone Change No. 2000-03 would make this conditional use permit approval null and void. 9. The applicant shall paint the exterior of the business within forty-five (45) days of adoption by the City Council. Colors shall be reviewed and approved by the Redevelopment Division. 10. The applicant shall implement a comprehensive security plan as approved by the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department within ninety (90} days of adoption by the City Council. Such security plan shall be maintained for the life of the conditional use permit. 2 11. The applicant shall submit a detailed sign plan to be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. Such sign plans shall include individual channels letters and a maximum twenty-five percent (25%) window signage. 12. Their shall be no adult entertainment activities pursuant to Lynwood Municipal Code Section 25-16.19. 13. The subject conditional use permit shall be brought back to the Planning Commission for review of said conditions within six (6) months of approval. 14. All conditions of approval shall be printed on the cover page of revised plans. 15. The applicant shall provide proof of City Council lawful approval of a live entertainment permit, to the satisfaction of the City Clerk. 16. The hours of operation of the dance hall shall be between 8:00 p.m. and 2:00 am. unless the time period is more restricted as outlined in the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department's Security Plan. 17. The applicant shall not exceed building occupancy loads as established under the Uniform Building Code, Los Angeles County Fire Code, or more restrictive based on the Los Angeles County Sheriff security plan. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION 18. All construction shall meet or exceed the minimum building standards that are referenced in the following codes: The Uniform Building Code - 1997 edition; The Uniform Plumbing Code - 1997 edition; The Uniform Mechanical Code - 1997 edition; The Uniform Fire Code -1997 edition; The Nationai Electric Code - 1996 edition; All as amended by the California Building Code of 1998. In case where the provisions of the California Building Code, the City of Lynwood Municipal Code, or the plans or specifications in these plans may conflict, the more restrictive provisions shall govern. 19. The applicant shall submit new sprinkler plans covering proposed expansion area. Such plan shall re reviewed and approved by the Plan Check Engineering consultant. Applicable permits shall be obtained. 20. The applicant shall provide a revised floor plan indicating accessible men's restrooms. Such plan shall be submitted to for plan check review. FIRE DEPARTMENT 21. Plans shall be submitted to the L. A. County Fire Department for plan check at the Fire Protection Division, 5823 Rickenbacker Road, Commerce, CA 90040- 3027, (323) 890-4243. CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 22. The applicant shall remove existing window signage in excess of twenty-five percent (25%) of the gross window area. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNINGVtESOS4eso.appea12001-02.approve.doc - 3 - 23. The applicant shall obtain an electrical permit and remedy electrical code violations on the exterior of the business. Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. and its conditions shall be delivered to the applicant: Section 4. Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may result in revocation or modification of the Conditional Use Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled meeting. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Department day of , 2001. PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )SS I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2001. AYES: NOES: ABSTAINS: ABSENT: City Clerk, City of Lynwood STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. on file in my office and that said resolution was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this _ day of 2001. City Clerk H:\WORDFILE\PLANNING\RESOS4eso.appeal2001-02.app~ove.doc - S - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL APPROVING APPEAL NO. 2001- 02; THEREBY OVERTURNING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DENYING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-03, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) TO C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) FOR THE LYNWOOD PLAZA; AND DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-31, A REQUEST TO EXPAND THE EXISTING EL FARALLON RESTAURANT AND DANCE HALL AT 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on May 15, 2001 and approved Appeal No. 2001-02 thereby overturning the decision of the Planning Commission and denying Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on April 17, 2001 to hear Appeal No. 2001-02 a request to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission and the item was continued for thirty (30) days; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council considered all pertinent facts, oral and written testimony; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on December 12, 2000 conducted a public hearing on the subject application and continued the item to the next regular meeting; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on January 9, 2001 conducted a public hearing on the subject application and continued the item for sixty (60) days; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on March 13, 2001 conducted a public hearing on the subject applications and approved Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31; and WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposal may have a significant effect on the environment, there may not be a significant effect in this case as mitigation measures were developed to reduce possible negative impacts to a level of insignificance, pursuant to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines as amended; Section 1. The Lynwood City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed project may adversely effect the comprehensive General Plan. The proposed zone change may allow more intensive and/or obtrusive land uses to establish. H:\WORDF[LE\PLANNINGUtESOSVeso.cc.drnyolfarallon.doc - 1 - B. The proposed location of the zone change may not be in accord with the objectives of the zoning code. Additional land uses permitted in a less restrictive commercial zone may not be able to comply with required development standards. C. The proposed location of the zone change may be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The land uses permitted in a less restrictive commercial zone may negatively impact properties in the vicinity.. D. The effects of the zone change may not have the implementation of mitigation measures that would reduce negative impacts on properties in the vicinity to a level of insignificance. Such mitigation measures would pertain to effects on noise, light and glare, transportation/circulation, and public services. E. The proposed project may adversely effect the comprehensive General Plan, specifically the following goals and policies; 1) Ensure that residential neighborhoods are protected from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses which may have a negative impact on the residential environment. (Land Use Element, Policy 3, page LU-19) 2) Prevent and mitigate the adverse impacts of noise from internal and external sources on Lynwood residents. (Circulation Element, Goal 1, page N-5) 3) Provide a pattern, scale, and design of land uses which promote individual safety. (Safety Element, Policy 5, page S-12) F. The proposed location of the conditional use may not be in accord with the objectives of Chapter 25, Zoning of the Lynwood Municipal Code, and the purpose of the zone in which the site is located. The zoning code strives to provide land uses and commercial establishments that serve the needs of residents city wide. The subject business may be creating negative impacts on adjacent residential and commercial properties. G. The location of the proposed conditional use and the conditions under which it operates or maintained may be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The establishment has a negative history of excessive police response requests. Residents have testified at public hearings of criminal activities and disturbance of their peace and welfare. H. The conditional use may not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the zoning chapter. The Lynwood Municipal Code requires dance halls and establishments that serve alcohol to have a conditional use permit and this business does not have such permits. I. The applicant has not demonstrated that he has implemented mitigation measures that would reduce negative impacts on properties in the vicinity to a level of insignificance. Such mitigation measures pertain to effect of noise, light and glare, transportation/circulation, and public services. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Appeal No. 2001-02 and thereby denies Zone Change No. 2000-03 and denies Conditional Use Permit No. 2000- 31. 2 Section 3. A copy of the Resolution No. applicant. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Dept. shall be delivered to the day of , 2001. PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney H:\WORDFILE\PLANNINGUtESOSlreso.cc.drnyelfazallon.doc . 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )SS I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on day of , 2001. AYES: NOES: ABSTAINS: ABSENT: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. on file in my office and that said resolution was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this day of , 2001. City Clerk 4 - •.., Rpt. !D: G-001-D ~ F REPORT DAT Event Date Incident Date Range Tim= 9e R D RO EBB RY - Address ~ - ,STRONG-ARM STAT CD. 041 ROBBERY, STRONG-ARM; Highway, Etc. \ '~ 06/27/2000 06/27/2000 \ 21:30 2112 3551 '! ROBBERY, STRONG-ARM: Highway, Etc. MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 ROBBERY, STRONG-ARM ASSAULT, FELONY STAT CD. 051 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW -Gun 03/26/2000 03/26/2000 01:55 2112 3551 1 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW -Gun MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 ASSAULT, FELONY ASSAULT, FELONY STAT CD. 053 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW - Other Dangerous Weapon 02/15/2000 02/15/2000 02/15/2000 01:21 01:21 2112 3551 1 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW -Other Dangerous W PonIN LUTHER KING BLVD ~ ASSAULT, FELONY ASSAULT, FELONY 03/12/2 00A 3CD20004 03/S12/2000 01E ~Op~ 15 DW 2 35 ds, Feet, Fist, Etc. 1 ASSAULT, FELONY: ADW _ 51 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 ASSAULT, FELONY Hands, Feet, Fist, Etc. GRAND THEFT STAT CD. 089 GRAND THEFT: Other (From Boat, Plane, Prot Res, Yard, Etc) 05/30/2000 05/29/2000 05/30!2000 23:30 01:30 2112 3551 1 GRAND THEFT: Other (From Boat, Plane, P MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 GRAND THEFT -vt Res, Yard, Etc) GRAND THEFT VEHICLE (GTA) STAT CD. 091 GRAND THEFT VEHICLE (GTA): Automobile/Passenger Van 02/08/2000 02/07/2000 D2/08/2D00 23:00 01:30 2112 3551 05/23/2000 05/23/2000 MARTIN LUT 17• 05/29/2000 05/29/2000 '06 2112 3551 07/04/200 211 HER KING MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 2 3551 0 07/03/2000 07/04/2000 22:00 01:30 2112 3551 02/08/2000 02/07/2000 KING BLVD BLVD 02/08/2000 23:00 01:30 2112 3551 07/23/2000 07/22/2000 ' 07/23/2000 22:00 03:00 21 08/26/2000 KING MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 12 3551 08/26/2000 08/28/2000 08/28/2000 02:32 2112 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD BLVD 08/28/2000 08/27/2000 08/28/2000 22:00 02 00 MARTIN LUTHER KING MARTIN LUTHER K BLVD : 2112 3551 9 GRAND THEFT VEHICLE ING HER KIN BLVD (GTA): Automobile/ 9 GRAND THEFT VEHICLE {GTA} G Passenge Van BLVD ASSAULT, MISDEMEANOR STAT CD. 144 ASSAULT MISDEM 0 , 1/15/2000 01!15/2000 EANOR: Hands, Fee t Fist Et 05/23/2000 05/23/2000 00:45 2112 3551 01:20 2 , , c. MARTIN LUTHER KING 112 3551 2 ASSAULT, MISDEMEANOR: Hands Feet 2 ASSA Fi RTIN LUTHER KING h BLVD BLVD , , st, ULT, MISDEMEANOR Etc . VEHICLE AND BOATING LAWS STAT CD. 255 VEHICLE AND BOATIN 01/0 9/2000 Oi/09/2000 G LAWS; Misdem ea 01/16/2000 01/16/2000 1:18 2112 3551 20:00 21 05/06/20 nor RTIN LUTHER KING 12 3551 00 05/06/2000 02:10 21 BLVD MARTIN LUTHER KING 12 3551 3 VEHICLE AND BOATING LA BLVD RTIN LUTHER KING WS; Misdemeanor 3 VEHICLE AND BOAT B LVD ING LAWS VEHICLE BURGLARY STAT CD. 340 VEHICLE BURGLARY: Auto/Passenger Van Burglary _. ~ - ,.~ 2000-D5~ 2000-030 2000-0477 2000-10257 2000-02620 2000-09817 2000-10206 2000-12869 2000-13106 2000-14295 2000-16705 2000-16833 2000-16835 2000-00957 2000-09768 2000-00576 2000-01065 2000-oassa Version: 2.05.10.0 System: ~ARCls ..--. Los Angeles Coun r "' ''~ R _ `nment pt. t~: ~-oot-~ CRIME INFORMATirON h Date ~ Time , By STAT CODE 8 ART 09/13/2000 12 4 • RD: 2112, 3551 : REPORT DATE:01/01/2000 to 08/31/2000 Event Date Incident Date Range lime Range R D Page: 2 0~ VEH CLE BURGLARY - Address APB 2 X Street 340 VEHICLE BURGLARY: A _ File Numbe uto/Passenger Van Burglary 04/23/2000 04/23/2000 04/23/2000 15:15 15:30 2112 3551 TlN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 VEHICLE BURGLARY: Auto/P la assenger Van Burg 1 VEHICLE BURGLARY ry 2000-0772' THEFT, PETTY ($400 OR LESS) STAT CD. 389 THEFT, PETTY ($400 OR LESS): Other (From Prot Res, Boat 06/2D/2000 06/13/2000 06/13/2000 00:00 01:00 21 Plane Y , , ard) 12 3551 1 THEFT, PETTY {$400 OR LESS): Other (From Pr LVD ~ TH t R N H o es Boat EFT, PETTY ($400 OR LESS) P ane,Yard 2000-11877 MISDEMEANORS, MISCELLANEOUS STAT CD. 399 MISDEMEANORS, MISCELLANEOUS: All Other Misdemeanors 03/06/2000 03/06/2000 03/06/2000 02:43 02:43 2112 3551 08/13/2000 08/13/2000 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 22:02 2112 3551 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 2 MISDEMEANORS MISCELL 2000-04368 2000 1 , ANEOUS: AU Other Misdemeanors 2 MISDEMEANORS, MISCELLANEOUS - 5772 NON-CRIMINAL STAT CD. 442 NON-CRIMINAL: Property LosUFound/Recovered 02/05/2000 01 /29/2000 23:41 2112 3551 RTIN LUTHER KING BLVD 1 NON-CRIMINAL: Property LosUFound/Re covered 1 NON-CRIMINAL 2000-02453 TOTAL Cases 2q Version: 2.05.10.0 system: tARCIS --- Los An Sheriff ~~ • R ' s ~ pc. ID: G-OOf-D artment Rf?: 2112, REPORT DATE: 01/01/2000 to 0 31/'2000 Event D t a e Incident Date Range Time Range R D _ -__ Address GRAND THEFT APB X_Street STAT CD. 089 GRAND THEFT: Other (From Boat, Plane, Prot Res, Yard oz/25/2000 02!25!2000 Etc) 19:30 , 2112 3555 MARTIN LUTHER KING 1 GRAND THEFT: Other (From Boat, Plane Prvt R BLVD g , es, Yard, Etc) 1 GRAND THEFT VEHICLE BURGLARY STAT CD. 340 VEHICLE BURGLARY: Auto/Passenger Van Burglary 02/04/2000 02/03!2000 02/04/2000 1 0:30 01:30 2112 3555 T1N LUTHER KING 1 VEHICLE BURGLARY: Auto/P BLVD assenger Van Burg ary 1 VEHICLE BURGLARY NON-CRIMINAL STAT CD. 444 NON-CRIMINAL: Suspicious Circumstances, Possible Criminal Act asn s/zooo os/1a/2ooo 19:00 i i 2112 3555 1 NON-CRIMINAL: Suspicious Circumstanc P T li N v ty BLVD G es, oss b e Crim 1 NON-CRIMINAL nal Act v y TOTAL Cases 3 Date & Time 09/12/2000 12: Page: 1 of ~ File Numb -----_- 2000-0377 2000-02361 2000-11738 Version: 2.05.10.0 ~ c~t~, o~ ~Y1~~OOD C~~'~~ L~ City ~Ildeeting CkaPt?enges i' I ~ 11330 BULLIS ROAD ~ I LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (310)603.0220 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING P.O. 032135 Appeal No. 2001-02: City Council Hearing Planning Commission Decision to Auprove Zone Chance No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Lynwood City Council will hear an appeal that has been filed regarding the Planning Commission decision to approve Zone Change No. 2000-03, changing the zoning designation from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial); and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31, to expand an existing restaurant and dance hall (EI Farallon) approximately 2,890 square feet, at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Lynwood, California. Legal descriptions are on file in the Planning Division, Community Development Department. Environmental Assessment: Mitigated Negative Declaration. Any person interested in expressing an opinion on these matters is invited to attend the public hearing and offer testimony in support vf, or in the opposition to, the proposed application. CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 TIME: 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard. PLACE: City Hall Council Chambers 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, Ca 90262 Anyone wishing to offer written testimony for or against the proposed application may write to the City Clerk or the Community Development Director at 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262. All proceedings pertaining to the above applications will be in conformance with the Lynwood Municipal Code, as amended. Dated the 20th day of March, 2001 By: Andrea Hooper, City Clerk Pubiish: Lynwood Press (Wave) March 29, 2001 H:\WORDFILEIPLANN[NGIPUBNOTICIappeal2001-02.doc i - ,.r,. ~~ ~, 1~ I~ ~I ~ ~ V ~ ~~ ~ ~ I1.IE'~~~ City of ~ ~T ~T ~~19r ~ T ~ ®~ (~'L ' ~ ~ „ ~a V 1 8Y ~ ~ v4 City vLleeting ChaQQenges 11330 BULLIS ROAD '~~~~- LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (310) 603-0220 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART6~EI~IT Receipt No. Date Filed March 19, 2001 Not applicable Appl RedC'd By Grant Taylor ~~~/~~~ ~ Zone Change 2000-03 and 2 ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ Case No (s) Conditional Use Permit 2000-31 2814 -zone change Reso No. 2812 -conditional use permit PLANNING ACTION APPLICATION FORM Ki~a°rdor~anc~iez 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA 90262 (310) 603-0220 Name of applicant Address (City, State, Zip Code) Telephone No 3551 Martin . Luther King Jr. Boulevard (E1 Farallon Restaurant & Dance Hall) Project Address CB-1 (Controlled Business) 6191-018-008 Tract 20680, Lot 70 Zone County Assessors Book Information Legal Description Page Parcel No. Check Tvue of Permit(s) Reaueste~i Please submit plans with a complete application. For Site Plan Review submit 10 Plans ONLY. ~ Appeal -City Council (lo Copies) Appeal -Planning Commission (_ copies) Certificate of Compliance ( Copies) Conditional Use Permit (26 Plans) Environmental Assessment (_copies) Generai Plan Amendment (i6 Plans) Home Occupation Permit (-Copies) Lot Line Merger (_ Copies) Lot Merger (-Copies) Property Owner Notice (-Copies) Modification of Cond. Use (26 copes) Sign Permit (z copies) Site Plan Review (io copies) Tentative Parcel Map (z6 copies) Tentative Subdivision Map (i6 copies) Variance (26 Copies) Zone Change (i6 copies) Zoning Ord. Adjustment (-copies) Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment ( Copies) PURPOSE OF APPLICATION S ix ]New Construction R ]Existing Construction. Request to change the Lynwood Plaza zoning from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial) and expand the E1 Farallon was approved by the Lynwood Planning Commission on March 13, 2001. Three (3) public hearings were conducted. Staff and the Planning Commission received extensive public comment and concerns pertaining to loitering, drugs, gangs, shootings, cruisin of er po ice re ate issues. ~ g~ noise trespassing and Plaza parking lot and surrouzidina „b,nP~aln,!_,nc od Ap t Signature March 19, 2001 Date h:\wordfi le\plann inglforrnslEN VASS2. DOC / Rcvised 03-06-01 3 ~. ~~ ~~~~~~I Nr~1t~ 7 n ZUti1 ~'~- iVB~lili" i1/ EiY C - ---•'•' • -~ ~ ~+~ r~-wwtlvCi AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS Employees of the Planning Division will ive eve files an application for Plannin or Develo ment a possible assistance to anyone who proof is on the applicant to make the showy g necepsarry blefore OWever, the burden of can be granted. Also there is no guarantee -expressed or comaliedpe th t anapproval will be granted by the agency or commission which has authority p the matter. y permit The applicant shall understand also that each matter must be carefully investigated and after a staff investigation has been made, or a public hearing has been held, the staff's recommendation or decision may be contrary to a position taken in any preliminary discussions. The staff is not permitted to assist the applicant or any opponents of any applicant in preparing arguments for or against a request. March 19, 2001 Date I have read the foregoing and understand that I HAVE 1'HE BURDEN OF PROOF in the matter arising under the application made by me.. :~. ~ ~`/ Applicant Signature Appeal No. 2001-02 (ZC 2000-03 & CUP 2000-31) Application Case Number. l~:~wordfile~planning\forms\EN VASS2.DOC Revised 03-06-01 4 March 22, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council C/O Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, CA 90262 RE: Appeal 2001-02: EI Farallon Restaurant, 3351 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Dear Council Members: The Planning Commission approved applications for Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 on March 13, 2001 regarding the EI Farallon Restaurant. During the three (3) public hearings, the Planning Commission received considerable public testimony including loitering, drug sales, gang activity, gun fire, shootings, cruising, noise issues and trespassing that directly affect the surrounding commercial properties and residents. The appeal is based on the following: • The Panning Commission failed to take into consideration the deleterious effects this establishment has on the surrounding properties based on the testimony brought forth by the public. • Expansion of this land use is contrary to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, the surrounding businesses and residents. Therefore, based on the public concerns, both residents and community issues, the Planning Commission decision should be overturned, the City Council should approve Appeal No. 2001-02 and deny Zone Change No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31. Attached is the City of Lynwood Appeal application and a list of citizens who spoke in opposition at the Planning Commission public hearings. Sincerely, Ricardo Sanchez, Mayor Pro Team Lynwood City Council •-• ,.,~ APPEAL NO. 2001-02 CITIZENS SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION EL FARALLON RESTAURANT Zone Change No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 December 12, 2000 Plannin4 Commission Meeting Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. Arvin Moore, 10740 San Luis Ave. Erasmo Castro, 10611 San Juan Ave. Raul Vallejo, 3825 Abbott Rd. Alma Gonzalez, 3905 Abbott Rd. Caroline Castillo, 10881 San Miguel Ave. Miguel Hernandez, ????? San Miguel Ave. January 9, 2001 Planning Commission Meeting Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. John Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. Raul Vallejo, 3825 Abbott Rd. Helen Lustig, 3907 Abbott Rd. Sandra Bustamente, ???? San Juan Ave. Amy Castro, 10116 San Juan Ave. Arturo Lopez, 4331 Lugo Ave. ?????, 10150 San Juan Ave. March 13, 2001 Planning Commission Meeting Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. Helen Lustig, 3907 Abbott Rd. Maria ???, 10616 San Juan Ave. John Graham, 10650 San Juan Ave. -~~ r_--3 `~ ~. ~~- b~ L ~ ~ The existing restaurant totals 14,779 square feet and the addition, if approved, would bring the restaurant area to a total of 17,816 square feet. The conditional use permit would serve three (3) purposes to include: 1) Expand the existing restaurant and dance ha112,890 square feet; and 2) Remove the nonconforming status of the business; and 3) Remove the nonconforming status of the alcohol license. Taylor stated the item has been continued from the December 12, 2000 and January 9, 2001 Planning Commission meetings due to a large number of public comments and concerns. Staff, the applicant and the Sheriff Department has been working to resolve issues and create a security plan for the Lynwood Plaza. The Planning Commission has four (4) options to include: 1) Deny the application; or 2) Approve the applications with strict conditions and time frames; or 3) Direct staff to draft a Zoning Ordinance Amendment; or 4) Continue the item. Attached are documents for denial and approval. If the Commission elects to approve the application, the item would be forwarded to the City Council. A conditional use permit only requires Commission approval, where a zone change is an ordinance an also requires City Council approval. The conditional use permit is null and void unless the zone change is approved by the City Council and there is a fifteen (15) day appeal period. Senior Planner Taylor introduced Lieutenant Michael Herek of the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department to explain a proposed security plan. Lt. Herek explained a security plan would be a contract between the Sheriff and the business owner and would initially include seven (7} deputies and one (1) sergeant for a period of ninety (90) days. After 90 days the security plan effectiveness would be evaluated and if warranted, revised. The security plan would prohibit cruising, close off rear driveways after 10:00 and channel traffic toward Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. The security plan would include a two (2} block radius around Lynwood Plaza to protect the adjacent residential neighborhoods. ~~~ i s^ LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION, March 13, 2001 Planning Commission met in regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers. Chair Dove called the meeting to order at 6:38 p.m. Commissioner Maciel led the flag salute. Chairperson Dove presiding. Commissioner's Abarca, Barnes, Maciel, Patel, Manalapaz and Reed answered roll call. Also present were Community Development Director Chicots, Deputy City Attorney Calsada, Senior Planner Taylor, and Planning Associate Barfield. Senior Planner Taylor announced the Agenda had been duly posted in accordance with the Brown Act. ITEM #5: MINUTES Minutes of meeting for February 13 2001. Motion by Reed, 2°d by Maciel to adopt the minutes. Approved 7-0. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS Item #6: ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-06 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.2000-31 APPLICANT: Hermelio Franco - 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Chair Dove introduced continued public hearing Item #6. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report and stated the applicant is requesting approval of a change of zoning for the property known as Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial). In addition, the applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit in order to expand the existing El Farallon Restaurant and Dance Ha112,890 square feet. D3dAFT DATE: May 14, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Manager ~~~ BY: Alfretta F. Earnest, Finance Director Annette Potts, Project Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT CDBG/HOME CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 PURPOSE: The purpose of this item is to request that Lynwood City Council review and approve the draft Consolidated Action Plan for fiscal year 2001-2002. BACKGROUND: In order to receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Program funds, HUD requires that the City have an approved Consolidated Planning document. HUD uses the Consolidated Plan as the City's funding application and planning document. 2. The Planing document identifies the City's overall housing and community development needs and outlines a strategy to address those needs on an annual basis. The primary purpose of the Plan is to match resources from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME), with the needs of Lynwood's under-served residents. Also identifies specific programs and projects, along with goals and objectives that will implement the long-range strategy. 3. The City of Lynwood has drafted its one-year Consolidated Plan for fiscal years 2001-2002 that consists of the following sections: • Executive Summary • Housing Needs Assessment • Homeless Population Needs • Special Population Needs • Public and Assisted Housing Needs • Lead Paint Hazard Reduction Strategy • Community Development Needs • Housing and Community Development Strategic Plan • Anti-Poverty Strategy/Vision for the future • One Year Action Plan for fiscal year 2001-2002 The One-Year Action Plan reflects the objectives identified within the five-year Plan and lists projects, programs and resources, which will assist in the implementation of the strategy annually 4. The Department of Housing and Urban Development provides federal funds to the City to subsidize it's efforts in expand economic opportunity, provide decent housing, a suitable living environment. The City of Lynwood expects to have $2,230,881 in CDBG funds and $701,000 in HOME funds, for a total of $2,931,881 for fiscal year 2001-2002. AC}EN7JA TPEM 5. HUD requires that the City encourages and during the preparation of the Consolidated Plans. by the Community Development Block Grant Commission, in order to obtain citizens input an Lynwood's housing and community development and one year action plan. allows citizen participation Hearings were conducted (CDBG) Advisory Board d comments on the City of needs, consolidated plan The CDBGAB Commission recommended that City Council allocate funds to the following activities for fiscal year 2001-2002: • CDBG Administration $320,000 • Fair Housing Foundation $ 16,355 • Code Enforcement $357,235 • Street lmprovement/2001 $1,213,909 • HOME Program 701 000 $2,608,499 PUBLIC SERVICES: MAXIMUM AVAILABLE $323,382 • Lynwood Senior Citizen $ 46,941 • Lynwood Afterschool Program$ 46,941 • Lynwood Crossing Guards $ 45,000 • Lynwood Natatorium Program $ 35,000 • Truevine Homeless Men $ 25,000 • Geter Foundation $ 25,000 • St. Francis Outreach $ 20,000 • St. Francis Children's Center $ 7,500 • Project Impact $ 15,000 • Drive-By Agony $ 15,000 • Positive Image $ 15,000 • World Literacy $ 10,000 • Rainbow Women Shelter $ 12,000 • Que-Up Therapy $ 5,000 $323,382 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: A Public Hearing was held on May 9, 2001, to allow for public comment and review of the Annual Action Plan. In addition, a 30-day review period was held to allow citizens to review the Plan prior to submission to City Council. As a result, no negative input or comments have been received. At their discretion, Council may wish to amend funding recommendations, which may be appropriate to meet the housing and community development needs of the community. Submission of the City's CDBG and HOME Applications, Consolidated Five Year Plan and Annual Action Plan for fiscal year 2001-2002 are due to HUD by May 15, 2001. Any and all amendments to the Draft Consolidated Five-Year Plan and Annual Action Plan should be approved to the deadline. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully request that the City Council, after review and consideration: 1. Adopt the Consolidated Annual Action Plan for fiscal year 2001-2002; and 2. Direct staff to submit CDBG and HOME Grant Applications to HUD before the May 15, 2001, deadline. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE CDBG AND HOME CONSOLIDATED ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development provides federal funding in the form of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and the Home Investment Partnership (HOME) Grant. These funds are made available to assist the City of Lynwood in providing decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income; and WHEREAS, HUD has made $2,230,881 in CDBG funds and $701,000 in HOME funds available for programming during the 2001-2002 fiscal year. When this amount is combined with CDBG program income in the amount of $75,000 and CDBG carryover funds in the amount of $75,000, the total amount for HUD activities is $2,931,881; and WHEREAS, four public hearings were held to obtain citizen input and comments on the City's housing and community development needs, draft Consolidated Annual Action Plan (FY2001-2002); and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council has reviewed the draft Consolidated Annual Action Plan and taken public comments and input into consideration, relating to Lynwood's community development and housing needs. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows: Section 2. The Annual Action Plan for fiscal year 2001-2002, CDBG and HOME applications, and the allocation of CDBG and HOME funds to the following activities for fiscal year 2001-2002: ^ HUD ADMINISTRATION $ 320,000 ^ FAIR HOUSING FOUNDATION 16,335 • CODE ENFORCEMENT 357,235 • STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2000 1,213,909 • HOME Program and Activities 701,000 ^ SENIOR CITIZEN PROGRAM 46,941 • AFTERSCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 46,941 ^ NATATORIUM EXTENDED HOURS 35,000 ^ LYNWOOD CROSSING GUARDS 45,000 ^ TRUEVINE HOMELESS MEN 25,000 • GETER FOUNDATION 25,000 • ST. FRANCIS OUTREACH 20,000 • ST FRANCIS CHILDRENS CENTER 7,500 • PROJECT IMPACT 15,000 ^ DRIVE BYAGONY 15,000 • POSITIVE IMAJE 15.000 ^ WORLD LITERACY 10,000 ^ RAINBOW WOMEN SHELTER 12,000 ^ QUE UP THERAPY 5,000 Section 2. This Resolution authorizes the required submittal of the Consolidated Annual Action Plan for fiscal year 2001-2002 to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Sectioe n 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of May, 2001. PAUL H. RICHARDS, II, MAYOR ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Ralph W. Davis III, City Manager APPROVED A S TO FORM: City Attorney APPEAL NO. 2001-02 CITIZENS SPEAKING IN SUPPORT EL FARALLON RESTAURANT Zone Change No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 December 12, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting Hermelio Franco, 9369 Gainford Ave., Downey (business owner) Sal Preciado, 13658 Hawthorne Blvd., Hawthorne (contractor) Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest (architect) Selena Martinez, 8050 E. Florence, Downey (architect) January 9. 2001 Planning Commission Meeting Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest Ken Swift, 11126 Duncan Ave. Sal Preciado, 13658 Hawthorne Blvd., Hawthorne Edwin Jacinto, 11824 Beach St. Jose Salachi, 12321 Alpine Ave. (read letter on behalf of Domitilia Aguilar,(LUSD) Jose Salachi, 12321 Alpine Ave. Dr. Wallace, 11321 Bullis Rd. (LUSD) Fernando Barregan, 11072 5th St. Ofelia Villanueva, (address inaudible) Rosa Mesa, 10895 Otis Ave. Jim Morton 10112 Long Beach Blvd. Rojero Duran, 2835 Glenwood, South Gate March 13, 2001 Planning Commission Meeting Selena Martinez, 8050 E. Florence Ave., Downey Ken Swift, 11126 Duncan Ave. Adolph Lopez, 11431 Plum St. -~ --, - -, o- ~:'' . ~~ Barnes inquired if the security plan would interfere within the business. Maciel inquired about the security plan effect on City patrols. Lt. Herek explained the security plan is for the parking lot and the area around Lynwood Plaza and private security is used inside the business. The security plan is in addition to the City contract and City patrols would not be affected. Manlapaz inquired about involvement of City in security plan. Dove inquired about security plan not depleting Sheriff services. Abarca inquired about other cities that have contract between the sheriff and private citizens. Maciel inquired about City liability. Calsada inquired about liability and area coverage. Lt. Herek explained the security plan does not include the City. The security plan would not deplete City police services. Other cities to have sheriff citizen contracts include West Hollywood and Pico Rivera. The City is not liable as the contract would be initiated between the Sheriff and Hermelio Franco and includes a 3% liability fee. Lt. Herek explained private security cannot patrol public property and is therefore not as effective as the Sheriff do. The sheriff can detain and arrest people inside and outside the business. Chicots commented the conditional use permit requires a security plan for the life of the business as approved by the Sheriff and the City. Said revisions would be reviewed and approved by the Sheriff and Planning Commission. Lt. Herek presented the security plan to the audience. Dove advised the audience of proper protocol during the public hearing. In addition, Chair Dove set forth ground rules to include maximum 3 minutes, no repetition of issues and provide new testimony. Dove opened the public hearing requesting speakers in favor. Deputy City Attorney Calsada swore in all speakers in the audience. Selena Martinez, 8050 E. Florence, Downey, the architect spoke in favor. ~-'~ ~"~Pj fi ~ ~~'+ :: ` 4 F.e.t} ~a~ '~ ~:-~u'vG. d H t~ M R-~. ~ ~~ r ; -- - ; - ~ Ken Swift, 11126 Duncan Ave., Lynwood, spoke in favor. Adolph Lopez, 11431 Plum St., spoke in favor. Chair Dove requested all those speakers in opposition. ~~~ Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San~e~Ave., spoke in opposition. Cited cruising, shootings, and noise. Helen Lustig, 3907 Abbott Road, spoke in opposition. Cited police issues. Raul Villejo, 3825 Abbott Road, spoke in opposition. Cited noise after 10:00 p.m. Maria ?(inaudible), 10616 San Juan Ave., spoke in opposition. Read a letter citing noise traffic and police issues. John Graham, 10650 San • Juan Ave., spoke in opposition. Cited police issues and sanitary concerns. Dove closed the public hearing. Motion by Reed, 2°d by Maciel to certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration, adopt Resolution 2814 approving zone change 2000-03 and adopt Resolution 2812 approving conditional use permit 2000-31. Approved 7-0. Item #7: Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-35 APPLICANT: Lidia Mansilla, 9915 Long Beach Boulevard Barfield presented the staff report and stated the applicant is requesting approval to continue to operate a public rental hall. At the last meeting the Commission directed staff to bring back a shared parking agreement with other properties or reduce the maximum capacity to 150 persons. Mr. Barf eld stated all properties have sufficient parking to accommodate 150 persons to which the property owner/applicant agrees. Dove opened the public hearing. -r ~,,, REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS -- ~ ~^ ^~^~~~ ~vvv-V3 AIVU PERMIT NO. 2000-31: APPLICANT: Emilio Franco- 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Chairperson Dove introduced item No. 13. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report summarizing the request by EI Farallon Restaurant and Dance Hall to expand 2,890 square feet. Mr. Taylor stated staff and the Sheriff Department has been working with the applicant on the security plan, staff will again meet with the applicant to confirm staff position, a neighborhood meeting will be noticed and scheduled, back to the Planning Commission for the March 13, 2001 meeting. It was moved by Commissioner Reed and seconded by Commissioner Vice-Chairperson Barnes to receive and file. ROLL CALL AYES: Commissioner(s) Abarca, Barnes, Dove, Manlapaz, Reed NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner(s) Maciel, Patel ABSTAIN: None SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL TOWN HALL MEETING: APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Chairperson Dove introduced item No. 14. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report and stated the Lynwood City Council has scheduled a Special Town Hall Meeting for Thursday, February 15, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. in Bateman Hall. The meeting is in response to the Lynwood School District plans to construct five (5) new schools and expand four (4) existing schools. Mr. Taylor identified new school locations and summarized format for the meeting. The Commission and members of the public were encouraged to attend. Chairperson Dove commented on possible effects of new school sites and school expansions. Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about effects of school expansions and new schools. Commissioner Reed commented about school overcrowding and need for City and School District to work together on the issue. It was moved by Commissioner Reed and seconded by Commissioner Abarca to receive and file. ROLL CALL AYES: Commissioner(s) Abarca, Barnes, Dove, Manlapaz, Reed NOES: None H:\WORDFILE\PLANNINGIMINUTES1Fcbruary 13, 2001.doc - / - eGENDA ITEM .~ LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 9 2001 The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood met in a regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers at 6:35 p.m. Commissioner Abarca led the flag salute. Chairman Dove presiding. Commissioners, Abarca, Barnes, Manlapaz, Patel, and Reed answered the roil call. Commissioner Maciel was absent. Motion by Commissioner Manlapaz and seconded by Commissioner Patel to excuse Commissioner Maciel. Motion carried 6-0. Also present were Deputy City Attorney Calsada, Community Development Director Chicots, Redevelopment Manager Morales, Senior Planner Taylor and Planning Associate Barfield. Senior Planner Taylor announced the Agenda had been duly posted in accordance with The Brown Act. Senior Planner Taylor stated their would be two sets of minutes at the next meeting. REORGANIZATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Chairman Dove announced this item would be heard after the last public hearing item. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to staff's request, Chairman Dove reorganized the agenda to hear item No.8 first due to the large number of citizens present for the project. -~-~ --• •~•-•~~ ~•.... cvvv-us ~-nu ~uniuITIONAL US 2000-31 APPLICANT: Emilio Franco- 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Chairperson Dove introduced public hearing item No. 8 Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report and stated the applicant is requesting to change the zoning for the entire Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial) in order to expand the existing EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall another 2,890 square feet. Senior Planner Taylor stated the property is non-conforming as dance halls are first permitted in the C-3 zone subject to a conditional use permit. Senior Planner Taylor said the property is nonconforming and may continue as a dance hall or nightclub without conditions of approval or control mechanisms. The Commission has four options to include: H:IWORDFILEIPLANNINGV.1INUTESUanuary 9, 2001min.dx - i - 1. Deny the application 2. Approve the application with strict conditions of approval 3. Direct staff to process a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to permit dance halls in the CB-1 zone subject to a CUP 4. Continue the item. Senior Planner Taylor said staff has pertormed a detailed environmental review and developed a number of mitigation measures. Community Development Director Chicots stated the applicant is not ready for approval as there are several .outstanding issues that are not resolved. Mr. Chicots stated the security plan is inadequate, lighting plan inadequate and traffic/parking control inadequate. The applicant needs to provide comprehensive plans and security measures to address crowd control and police problems. Mr. Chicots recommended the item be continued and the City would schedule a "Neighborhood Meeting" between the applicant and residents to discuss resolution of issues. Commissioner Reed inquired about the Mitigation measures. Senior Planner Taylor responded mitigation measures were developed pursuant to traffic, parking, noise, light and glare, air quality and public service. Chairperson Dove inquired about the security plan. Community Development Director Chicots responded. A comprehensive Secuity Plan is needed. Chairperson Dove opened the public hearing and requested the applicant and /or his representative speak first. Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest spoke in favor. Mr. Mbele is the architect and agreed to proposed conditions of approval, agreed to consult with the Sheriff and agreed to meet with neighbors and residents. Kent Swift, 11126 Duncan Avenue, spoke in favor and identified awards given to Mr. Franco. Sal Preciado, 13658 Hawthorne Blvd., Hawthorne. Contractor spoke in favor and agreed to address parking, traffic and security. Edwin Jacinto, 11824 Beach, a focal business owner spoke in favor. Jose Salachi, 12321 Alpine, spoke in favor and presented awards Mr. Franco had received to the Pianning Commission. Chairperson Dove advised the audience of proper protocol. Dr. Wallace, Lynwood Unified School District, 11321 Bulfis Road, spoke in favor and stated he was sent by the School Superintendent to speak on behalf of him, Harold Cebrun. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNMGV.IINUTESUanuary 9, 2001min.doc -2- Fernando Barregan, 11072 5~' Street, spoke in favor. Ofelia Villanueva, ???? spoke in favor. Alejandro ????, 5443 Olanda Avenue spoke in favor. Rosa Mesa, 10895 Otis Avenue, spoke in favor. Jose Salachi, read a letter from the School District President, Domitilia Aguilar who supported the project. Jim Morton, 10112 long Beach Boulevard spoke in favor. Rojero Duran (EI Farallon employee), 2835 Glenwood, South Gate spoke in favor. Chairperson Dove requested citizens wishing to speak in opposition. Teresa Coleman-Graham, 10650 San Juan, spoke in opposition. Described Sheriff assistance during holidays, said big problem when no Sheriff and received a letter from Mr. Franco inviting her to the restaurant to discuss issues. Chairperson Dove asked Mr. Graham about the zone change proposal. She said she is against it. John Graham, 10650 San Juan, spoke in opposition. Added to his wife's concerns Raul Vallejo, 3825 Abbott Road spoke in opposition. Said the nightclub is the main business and residents are victims after 9:00 p.m. Helen Lusting, 3907 Abbott Road spoke in opposition. Said there is little business at the restaurant and the problems are with the nightclub. Sandra Bustamante, ???? San Juan spoke in opposition. Said its like the wild west at night. Amy Castro, 10116 San Juan spoke in opposition. Said she has to clean up trash on her property regularly and the business is noisy. Arturo Lopez, 4331 Lugo spoke in opposition. Regular gunfire. ???, 10150 San Juan spoke in opposition. Described gunfire. Chairperson Dove requested rebuttal comments from the applicant Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest spoke. He thanked the audience and Planning Commission for their patience. Praised Mr. Franco's community service activities. Requested a continuance. Will meet with citizens to discuss and remedy issues. Chairperson Dove closed the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Abarca to continue the item. Approved 6-0. H:IWORDFILEWLANNINGVvtTNUTESUanuary 9, 2001min.dot -3- Commissioner Abarca asked if 30 days is enough time. Community Development Director Chicots suggested a meeting at Bateman Hall as soon as possible. Ike Mbele requested 45 days continuance and could have a meeting in a couple weeks at Bateman Hall. A member of the audience requested notification of the neighborhood meeting. Commissioner Reed amended motion to continue until March meeting, have staff send out the 300 foot Radious notice for the neighborhood meeting, Seconded by Commissioner Abarca. Approved 6-0. Senior Planner Taylor passed out a sign up sheet to the audience and requested citizens who wish to be notified of the neighborhood meeting should write down their names and addresses. Chairperson Dove declared a brief recess. Chairperson Dove reconvened the meeting at 8:15 p.m. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-23 APPLICANT: Oscar Aparicio and Sara Mata Balbuena- 10733-10749 Long Beach Blvd. Chairperson Dove introduced public hearing item No 7. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report stated the applicant is requesting approval to operate a used car sales lot in conjunction with a nonconforming auto service center. The item had been previously continued for 60 days to allow the property owner to remedy code violations and comply with conditions of approval. Mr. Taylor stated he had inspected the property on two occasions and observed substantial compliance. Chairperson Dove opened the public hearing. Oscar Aparicio, proepty owner, 10733-10749 Long Beach Blvd. Spoke in favor. Mr. Aparicio had Vanessa Balbuena translate. Mr. Aparicio inquired about conditions to be completed. Senior Planner Taylor stated he must remove the remaining inoperable vehicles at the rear of the properly, pave the rear parking area and submit a landscaping plan. Mr. Taylor said the front half of the property is complete, but the rear half still needs work. Chairperson Dove closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Reed and seconded by Commissioner Abarca to adopt Resolution 2799 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-23. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNMGUIINUTESVanuary 9, 200 ~ min.doc -4- ROLL CALL AYES: Commissioner (s) Abarca, Barnes, Dove, Maciel, Manlapaz, Patel, Reed NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN None ZONE CHANGE 2000-03 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2000-31 APPLICANT: Emilio Franco - 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard Chairperson Dove introduced new public hearing item No. 12. Senior Planner Taylor presented a staff report and stated the applicant is requesting change of zoning for the entire Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial) in order to expand the existing EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall another 2,890 square feet. Mr. Taylor stated the property is non-conforming as dance halls are first permitted in the C-3 zone subject to a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Taylor said staff is not in a position to support the project at this time due to police response issues at the property. Mr. Taylor said the Punning Commission has three options to include: 1. Deny the application 2. Approve the application with strict conditions of approval 3. Direct staff to process a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to permit dance halls in the CB-1 zone subject to a CUP. Senior Planner Taylor said the applicant has five (5) valid licenses for his business and it may be the best option to give the applicant an opportunity to become legal and remove the non-conforming status, however, strict conditions of approval would be mandatory to include having a security plan reviewed and approved by the Sheriff, have an exterior lighting plan, have a parking and traffic circulation plan, perform exterior improvements to the building and parking area, etc. Mr. Taylor said staff is recommending continuance pursuant to an environmental review, public response and Commission concerns. Chairperson Dove opened the public hearing. Emilio Franco , 9369 Gainford Avenue, Downey spoke in favor. Sal Preciado, 13658 Hawthorne Blvd., Hawthorne spoke in favor. Ike Mbele, 24402 Calle Torcido, Lake Forest spoke in favor. Selena Martinez, 8050 E. Florence, Downey spoke in favor. Mr. Mbele sated the applicant will submit security plan, improve parking lot and provide landscaping. Also said applicant will hire a traffic consultant to prepare parking and traffic circulation plan. Chairperson Dove questioned security. H:IWORDFILEU'LANNINGV.1INlTTESIDecember 12, 2000min.da -6- Deputy City Attorney Calsada inquired who is the property owner and is the applicant aware of the Redevelopment Agency ENA (exclusive negotiation agreement) for the Lynwood Plaza. Commissioner Abarca inquired about Redevelopment Agency plan and relocating the business. Mr. Franco said Park Turner is the owner and he is not aware of the ENA or Redevelopment Agency plans. Sal Preciado responded saying they will comply with all conditions. Discussion ensued between the Planning Commission, applicants and staff regarding business relocation and Redevelopment Agency plans. Teresa Coleman, 10650 San Juan Avenue spoke in opposition. Arvin Moore, 10740 San Luis Avenue, spoke in opposition. Erasmo Castro, 10611 San Juan Avenue, spoke in opposition. Raul Vallejo, 3825 Abbott Road, spoke in opposition. Alma Gonzalez, 3905 Abbott Road spoke in opposition. Caroline Castillo, 10881 San Miguel ;poke in opposition. Miguel Hernandez, ????? San Miguel spoke in opposition. All citizens who spoke in opposition claim the business attracts gangs and a rowdy crowd; their have been shootings, car racing, loud noise, public intoxication, public urination, public sex, and they are scared for their safety and their families safety: Chairperson Dove closed the public hearing. Chairperson Dove commented on police incidents, the business operation and proposed conditions of approval. Commissioner Maciel commented on Police problems with EI Farallon and issues that must be dealt with. Suggested a neighborhood petition and speaking with City Council members. Commissioner Manlapaz concurred with Commissioner Maciel on police issues and suggested citizens speak with Council Members. It was moved by Commissioner Maciel and seconded by Commissioner Manlapaz to continue to the next regular meeting on January 9, 2001. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-32 APPLICANT: Roman Campos - 10232-10232 ~/z Long Beach Blvd. Chairperson Dove announced new public hearing item No. 13. H:IWORDFILE\PLANNING1MINlTTES~Decembet 12, 2000min.doc -7- ~~. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, Ca. 95814 From: City of Lynwood City of Lynwood 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, Ca. 90262 County Clerk County of Los Angeles 500 West Temple Los Angeles, Ca. 90012 SUB7ECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 2151 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title: Zone Change No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 State Clearinghouse Number: N/A Lead Agency: City of Lynwood, (310) 603-0220 Project Location-Specific: The subject properties are commercial structures within the Lynwood Plaza bounded by Abbott Road to the north; Norton Avenue to the south; Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to the west; and San Luis Avenue to the east. The property totals 551,890 square feet or 12.67 acres in area. The property is further described as Tract 20680, Lots 70 and 71; Assessor's Map Book 6191, Page 18, Parcels 001, 002, 003, 005, 006, 007, 008 and 009; located at 3539 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.; 3545 through 3581 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., 3595 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.; 3700 through 3706 Abbott Road and 3898 Abbott Road. Project Description: The proposed project consists of entitlements to change the zoning designation for a shopping center (Lynwood Plaza) from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C- 3 (Heavy Commercial); and to construct a 2,890 square foot addition, within an existing structure, to an existing restaurant and dance hall, EI Farallon Restaurant/Dance Hall, bringing the total area of the business to 17,816 square feet. The subject business is located at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, APN 6191-018-008. This is to advise that the City of Lynwood as Lead Agency has approved the above-described Negative Declaration on March 13, 2001 and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project. 1. The project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of approval of the Project. 4. A Statement of Overriding Conditions was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at Lynwood City Hall Annex, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262. Signature Date: Title: Community Development Director, City of Lynwood Date received for filing at County of Los Angeles: Date received for filing at OPR: H:\W ORDF[LE\PLANNING\not.det.zc2000-03.cup2000-31.doc CITY OF LYNWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CA 90262 (310) 603-0220, Extension 326 NEGATIVE DECLARATION County Clerk Corporation Division, Room 106 Post Office Box 151 Los Angeles, Ca. 9003 RE: Negative Declaration for Zone hange Nn ~nnn_03 and (~nnrl;r;n No. 2000-31 3551 Martin Luther Km Jr. Boulevard L nwood nal Use Permit To Whom It May Concern: Application leas been filed with the City of Lynwood for approval of the project known as Zone Chan e No. 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 located at at the Lynwood Plaza and bounders by a ~,~,.,++ u,..,a .,..L _ _ ., _ . - ~.. Lu,~ r~vcilue to me east. The ro ert is further de cribed a Tract 20 80 Lots 70 and 71 • Assessor's Ma Book 6191 Page 18. Parcels 001. nn~ nn•z nn: nn~ n„-, ,,,,,, ,..._ Luther Kin Jr. Blvd. 3700 throe h 3706 Abbott Road and 3898 Abbott Road' The project is briefly described as: allow additional land uses for future develo ment. ... - -- would brin the business establishment total area to I7 8l9 s care feet. In accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act, State .Guidelines, and the City of Lynwood Guidelines for the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Department of Community Development of the City of Lynwood analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, the Department prepared and hereby filed this NEGATIVE DECLARATION. A period of twenty-one (21} days from the date of filing of this NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be provided to enable public revievr of the project specifications and this document prior to action on the project by the Ciiy of Lynwood. A copy of the project specification is on file in the offices of the Department of Community Development, City Hall 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. This Document is being filed in duplicate. Please acknowledge filing date and return the copy in the enclosed stamped, self- addressed envelope. Prepared and filed by: The Department of Community Dev Iopment BY: - ~_ rant Taylor, Senior P er h:lwordfi Idplannninglronns~negdec.doc Revised 07-27-98 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Findings Project Title: Zone Change No. 2000-03 & Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-31 Project Site: 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Lynwood Lynwood Plaza, 3539-3595 Martin Luther King & 3700-3798 Abbott Road Tract 20680, Lots 70 and 71 Assessor's Parcel # 6191-018-001, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 009. Applicant: Hermelio Franco 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard Lynwood, CA 90262 Project Description: The proposed project consists of entitlement to construct an addition to an existing restaurant and dance hall. The initial study is based on a maximum 2,890 square feet. The subject property is located on a 551,890 square foot parcel or 12.67 acres within the new zoning designation of C-3 (Heavy Commercial). The area is bounded by Abbott Road to the north; Norton Avenue to the south; Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to the west; and San Luis Avenue to the east. Findings of Exemption: This project will not have an individual or cumulative adverse effect on fish and/ or wildlife resources in that the Initial Stud environmental review of the project nor the recordrof the proceedings~or )ts a~th royal identified any potential impacts to fish and game or such resources. pp Certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact and that (based upon the initial study and hearing record) the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Grant Taylor Senior Planner Title City of Lynwood Lead Agency Date 1~L.YN_SRV I \VOL3IWORDFILEIPLANNq.1G1f sh&game.3551 mlk.doc CITY OF LYNWOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) I. BACKGROUND 7. Name of proponent: Hermilio Franco (EI Farallon Restaurant) 2. Address and phone number of proponent: 3551 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd Lynwood, Ca. 90262, 3. Date of checklist submitted: November 29.2000 4. Agency Requiring Checklist : City of Lynwood 5. Name of proposal, if applicable: Zone Change No 2000-03 and Conditional Use Permit No.2000-31 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers are required on attached sheets.) 1. Earth. Will the proposal results in: YES ~ MAYBE a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b) Disruption, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c) Change in topography or ground surtace relief features? d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e-) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g) Exposure of people of property to geologic hazards such as earthquake, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazard? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: NO X X X X X X X H:IWORDFI LEIPLANNINGIFORMS~ZC2000-03. EN V. DOC 1 YES MAYBE Np a) Substantial air emission or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b) The creation of obecjtionable odors? X c) Alterations of air movements, moisture , temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? 3• Water. Will the proposal result in: X a} Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movement, in either marine or fresh waters? X b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X c} Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alterations of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity? -____ X f) Alterations of the direction or rates of flow of ground waters? X 9) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X 1) Exposure of people or property to water _ relocated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: _X a) Change in the diversity of sp~,cifies , or number of any species of plants {including trees, shrubs, grass, crops , and aquatic plants)? b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique X_ , rare or endangered species of plants? c) Introduction of new species of plants into X an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? H:IWORDFILEIPLANNMGIFORMSIZC2000-0J.ENV.DOC 2 X - __ ._, ..., YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X ~. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species or , numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects. }? X b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c) Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d} Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a) increase in existing noise levels? X b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X $. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area.? 9. Natural resources. Will the proposal result in: X a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural sources? X b) Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resources? ~~. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: -- -X- a.) A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances( including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b) Possible interterence with an emergency X response plan or an emergency evacuation plan. X H:\1V0 RDF I LEIPLANNI NG\FORMS\ZC2000.03. EN V . DOC 3 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, YES distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/ Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation of movements of people and/ or goods? e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f) increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicle, bicyclist or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the p: oposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a) Fire Protection? b) Police Protection? c) Schools? d) Park or other recreational facilities? e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f) Other governmental services? 15• Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substanti_~( amounts of fuel or energy? b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: y:~H'ORDFI LE1P LANN IN G~FORMS~ZC2000-03. EN V . DOC MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 a} Power or natural gas? b) Communication systems? c) Water? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Wilt the proposal result in: a) Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health}? b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b) Will the proposal result in the adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X X X X X X -. X X H:\ W ORDFILE\PLANNING\FORMS\ZC2000-03.EN V.DOC 5 YES MAYBE NO 21. Mandatory Findings or Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- . term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endue well into the future.) X c) Does the project have impact which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resources is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environmental is significant.) X d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X DISCUSSION OF EP.IJIRONMENTAL EVALUATION SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" H:\wORDFILE\PLANNING\FORMS\ZC2000-0~. ENV.DOC 6 IV. DETERMINATION ( To be completed by the Lead Agency) ON THE BASIS OF THIS INITIAL EVALUATION: ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (~ ] I find that a{though the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ] I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: November 29. 2000 gY: ~ ~~ -~'~ Signat Grant Taylor Print Full Name Community Development Department Department H:1 W ORDFILEIPLANNINGIFORMSIZC2D00-03.EN V.DOC 7 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF LYNWOOD DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES BACKGROUND Applicant: Hermelio Franco EI Farallon Restaurant and Dance Hall 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (310) 631-4899 (310) 862-5311 Lead Agency: City of Lynwood Community Development Department 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, CA 90262 (310) 603-0220 Grant Taylor, Senior Planner Date of Initial Study & Mitigation Measures: November 29, 2000 PROPOSAL The proposed project is to expand an existing restaurant and dance hall 2,890 square feet within an existing multiple tenant building. The existing restaurant and dance hall totals 14,779 square feet and the addition would bring the total area to 17,816 square feet. In addition, the proposal includes changing the zoning for the entire Lynwood Plaza from CB-1 (Controlled Business) to C-3 (Heavy Commercial). The Lynwood Plaza contains the dance hall and a liquor store that is not permitted in the CB-1 zone and are therefore non-conforming. Non-conforming land uses may not alter or expand, and have an amortization period to convert to a conforming land use. Without approval of a zone change, the conditional use permit cannot be granted. It would not make good planning sense to only change the zone for the restaurant property, therefore, the proposed zone change is for the entire Lynwood Plaza. PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The subject property is located at 3551 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard within a Cb-1 (Controlled Business) zone. The zoning is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Commercial. The property is located on the north side of Martin Luther King )r. Boulevard between Abbott Road and Norton Avenue. The property comprises eight (8) lots that totals 551,890 square feet in area or 12.67 acres. The Lynwood Plaza is developed with a multiple tenant building that occupies about twenty percent (20%) of the lot area and is also developed with two (2) separate restaurants and two (2) office/retail buildings. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described herein have been added to this project. A Negative Declaration will be prepared. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM There are three (3) possible responses to each of the questions on the preceding Environmental Checklist Form: 1) No Impact. This response is used when the proposed project does not have any measurable environmental impact. 2) Maybe (possible impact). This response is used when the proposed project may have a possible environmental impact; however, if an impact wil) result of the significance of the impact cannot be determined. Mitigation measures are incorporated into the resolution to reduce possible impacts to a leve{ of insignificance. 3) Yes (potential impact). This response is used when the proposed project potentially has an environmental impact. Mitigation measures are incorporated into the resolution to reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Page 6 on the Initial Study/Environmental Checklist) Noise Impact Discussion &Mitiaation Measures 6a} Increase in existing noise levels? On weekends, the business currently generates noise levels that may be unacceptable. There is loitering, cruising, vehicle racing, etc. in conjunction with EI Farallon. Expanding an additional 2,890 square feet may increase noise levels. If approved, the applicant will be required to draft and submit a security plan to be reviewed and approved by the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department. The security plan would discourage undesirable or illegal activities and would include number of security personnel, hours of security supervision, a guard tower, hand radios, etc. The applicant would also be required to submit a parking and traffic circulation plan in order to minimize vehicular movement and improve traffic flow within the parking area. In addition, the applicant would be required to submit an exterior lighting plan as a well illuminated parking area would discourage undesirable and illegal activities. 6b) As mentioned above, the business may generate undesirable noise levels and expansion may intensify noise levels. To mitigate potential noise levels to a level of insignificance a security plan, parking and traffic circulation plan and lighting plan would all he required. The grading may slightly after the topography. A grading and drainage plan will be reviewed and applicable permits required. Liaht and Glare Impact Discussion &Mitiaation Measures 7) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? The project may produce new light and glare as exterior lighting would be required for security purposes in the parking area and around the business. The applicant would be required to submit a detailed lighting plan and the light standards would be erected away from neighboring residential properties and the lights would be installed so as to be directed away from neighboring residences and businesses. Transportation/Circulation Discussion & Mitigation Measures 13a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Increasing the size of the restaurant and dance hall may attract additional vehicles and therefore increase vehicular movement. A detailed parking and traffic circulation plan will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department. The plan would include parking lot attendants, delineation of traffic circulation, and assisted parking. 13b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? The project will require parking facilities sufficient for employees and patrons to the business. On weekend evenings, the majority of patrons utilize the parking area to the rear of the business where the dance hall entrance is located. The Lynwood Municipal Code requires one (1) parking stall for each one hundred (100) square feet of building area for restaurants, therefore, if approved, EI Farallon would require 178 parking stalls. The entire Lynwood Plaza contains approximately 68Z parking stalls to serve all businesses. 330 parking stalls are located directly behind and in close proximity to the business. The applicant will be required to submit a detailed parking and traffic circulation plan to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff. Components of the plan would be directed and assisted parking, delineation of traffic flow, etc. 14a) Will the proposal result in a need for new or altered fire protection? Expanding the existing business would increase the business occupancy load and therefore may increase the need for fire protection. The applicant will be required to submit detailed plans to the Los Angeles Coun Fire Department for plan check and review to ensure that required fire safety protection measures and included. The entire building will require sprinklers, exits must remain clear and accessible, and fire extinguisher present and operable at the site. 14b) Will the proposal result in a need for new or altered police protection? The business has a poor police incident record. Expanding the business may attract additional patrons and therefore increase the need for police services. The applicant will be required to submit a detailed security plan to be reviewed and approved by the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department. The plan shall include number of security personnel, hours of security coverage, exterior lighting, hand radios and other measures required by the Sheriff to discourage undesirable and illegal activities at the site. ,-•~ In conclusion, a condition will be included that requires the applicant to return to the Planning Commission within six (6) months for a review of the police records and compliance with mandatory conditions of approval. Failure to comply with all conditions of approval may result in revocation proceedings being initiated against the conditional use permit and/or business license and/or referral to the City Prosecutor for legal action against the business owner and property owners. DATE: May 15, 2001 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, Ilt, City Manager ~ ~`~ BY: Joseph Y. Wang, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Enginee~` •~.+~ `, "~- Paul Nguyen, Civil Engineering Associate ~ 1 SUBJECT: Lynwood Lighting Assessment District No. 2001-A PURPOSE: This report recommends that the City Council approve the attached Engineer's Report for Lynwood Lighting Assessment District No.2001-A and recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention, which sets this matter for public hearing. BACKGROUND: The Lynwood Lighting Assessment District was first established in 1978 under the Street Lighting Act of 1919. The District was reformed in 1981 under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The cost of maintenance, including the assessment engineering costs and administration can be levied annually against the properties which receive the benefits, thereby relieving the General Fund of that amount. Property owners are assessed only for the benefits received. The assessments were levied as a fair and equitable way to provide funds to maintain, operate and improve the lighting areas in the City. The plans and specifications for the District are on file with the City Clerk and the Director of Public Works. The City Council, on March 6, 2001, adopted Resolution 2001-26 proposing the formation of a Lighting Assessment District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and directed the preparation of the Engineer's Report. For fiscal year 2001-2002, the estimated cost of providing street lighting maintenance is $862,400. The annual installment for Certificate of Participation, as approved by the City Council in 1992 is $256,000. Since a surplus of $60,000 from FY 2001-2002 is projected, the revenue required for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 is $1,058,400. ANALYSIS: The current assessment rates are $1.62/F.F. and $3.01/F.F. for residential and commercial lots, respectively. If the City maintains these current rates for FY 2001- 2002, the estimated revenue would be $1,058,465, which is sufficient to cover for all costs of the District. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Adopt the attached resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING THE REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, SECTION 22565 ET SEQ., AS ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 6, 2001, RELATING TO THE LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT" AGENllA ITEM k 13 . ~._. 2. Adopt the attached Resolution of Intention entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 WITHIN LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", AS AMENDED, (COMMENCING WITH STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 22500 ET SEQ.), AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS" LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT Pursuant to the LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (Division 15, Part 2) STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DATED: May 15, 2001 LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Prepared by: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. City Engineer 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, California 90262 Cou01019 ENGINEER'S REPORT THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Gentlemen: Pursuant to the Resolution No. 2001-26 adopted by your Honorable Body on March 6, 2001, I have prepared the ENGINEER'S REPORT Required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended, (Division 15, Part 2, Streets and Highways Code of the State of California). This Engineer's Report contemplates the levying of an assessment to provide funds necessary to construct, install, maintain and service public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities within the Lynwood Lighting Assessment District (the "District"). The assessment will be levied against those parcels of land within said District benefiting from the improvements, as required by law. Proper construction, installation, maintenance and servicing of the street lighting facilities within the District benefit each and every assessable property within the District by providing proper illumination for ingress and egress and safe traveling at night to and from such properties. It also improves protection of such properties from crime and vandalism. The foregoing enhances property values. Since the lighting facilities are located along the public streets, the front footage of each benefited property along such streets is used as the base for distributing the overall costs of the improvements in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each assessable parcel from the improvements. The different assessments for commercial and residential properties are based on different lumen and other design requirements along major arterial and residential streets. THE ENGINEER'S REPORT Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended, it is required that an Engineer's Report be prepared and filed with the City Clerk, who in turn presents it to the City Council for its consideration. The said Engineer's Report consists of the following: Engineer's Report May 15, 2001 Page 2 1. PLAN NO. 2001-A AND SPECIFICATIONS. The plans and specifications for the improvements within the District are on file with the City Clerk and Director of Public Works and incorporated herein by reference. Plan No. 2001-A shows the approximate location, nature and extent of the street lighting system of the District. Existing and previously proposed improvements for fiscal year 2001-2002 include, but are not limited to, the following: electrical energy; repair and replacement of street light standards and fixtures; labor; materials; equipment; miscellaneous improvements; overhead and incidental work and construction of capital improvement projects (see attached Capital Improvement Project List) as required. A diagram of the District, showing the exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of each lot or parcel of land within the District, is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's Maps for fiscal year 2001-2002 for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels within the District. 2. ESTIMATE OF COSTS. Maintenance and Servicing Costs The estimate of the maintenance and servicing costs with respect to the District (including incidental expenses) for the one year period beginning July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002 is as follows: Street Lighting A. Personnel $199,400 B. Maintenance & Operations $663,000 TOTAL COST $862,400 The maintenance and servicing costs are further described in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Capital Improvement Costs In 1993, the City of Lynwood entered into an agreement with the Lighting Assessment District pursuant to Section 22662 (b) of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 whereby the District received an advance of $2,560,703 from the City of Lynwood for deposit to the Capital Improvement Fund and would repay the City through the levy and collection of annual assessments for those improvements over a period of twenty (20) years, commencing with fiscal year 1992-93. The annual installment is $ 256,000. A list of the approved projects and their status is attached with this report as Exhibit A. Engineer's Report May 15, 2001 Page 3 Total Estimated Costs The total amount to be assessed against parcels within the District for FY 2001-2002, consisting of the maintenance and servicing costs for FY 2001-2002 and the annual installment for capital improvement cost discussed above, is as follows: FY 2001-2002 ASSESSMENT Street Lighting Costs $862,400 (Sidewalk and street maintenance and operation) Annual Installment for $256,000 Certificates of Participation (Revenue Bonds) TOTAL COST: $1,118,400 Estimated surplus FY 2000-01 $ 60,000 NET AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED: $1,058,400 3. TOTAL NUMBER OF LIGHTS IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD EDISON OWNED CITY OWNED TOTAL Lumen Number Lumen Number Lumen Number 7,000 0 7,000 41 7,000 41 9,500 1,635 9,500 251 9,500 1,886 15,000 142 15,000 80 15,000 211 20,000 143 20,000 146 20,000 289 25,500 0 25,500 551 25,500 551 35,000 0 35,000 8 35,000 8 47, 000 0 47, 000 87 47, 000 87 55,000 0 55,000 5 55,000 5 TOTAL 1,920 1169 3,089 1. Residential properties with 7,000 - 15,000 lumen/light. 2. Commercial properties with 20,000 - 55,000 lumen/light. Engineer's Report May 15, 2001 Page 4 4. ASSESSMENT OF ESTIMATED COST There are approximately 10,055 parcels of property, with approximately 575,997 feet of front footage, within the District, excluding parcels of public property, which are not assessed for the cost of improvements. Zone Feet Rate Amount 485,818 $1.62/FF $ 787,025 2 90,179 $3.01 /FF $ 271,440 Estimated Revenue: $1,058,465 5. ASSESSMENT ROLL In compliance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, copies of the County Assessor's Map and the County Tax Collector's tax rolls were used in this Engineer's Report. The assessment roll, for each parcel of land therein, shows the legal description, the County Assessor's code numbers, the assessable front footage used in calculating the assessment against each individual parcel and the total net assessment levied against the parcel. All assessable parcels of land in said District were included in one of the two zones of benefit as set forth herein above. The assessment roll is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is incorporated herein by reference. The foregoing Engineer's Report, which includes PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, and the DIAGRAM, ASSESSMENT ROLL and the ESTIMATE OF COSTS, is presented herewith for your approval by resolution. Dated this 1 St day of May, 2001 Respectfully, JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. City Engineer City of Lynwood -. Attachments Cou01019 STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET COMPLETED, 1. Street Lighting Rehab. (Res.) $740,503 100 2. Street Lighting Rehab. (Comm.) $1,114,000 100 3. Public Works Yard $360,000 100 4. Cesar Chavez Ln. Lighting $31,200 100 5. Security Lighting $100,000 100 6. Lynwood City Park Lighting $200,000 100 TOTAL: $2,545,703 Cou01020 ATTACHMENT "A" City ~YNW Lynwood Lighting Mai 2001-A Boundary Map For information on lines Or parcel, refer to plan 2001-A and Los Angeles County Assessors's Maps on file with the City Engineer. All publicity owned properties are assessment exempt From the district. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING THE REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, SECTION 22565 ET SEQ., AS ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 6, 2001, RELATING TO THE LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council on March 6, 2001, adopted Resolution No. 2001-26, instructing the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk, a report in writing in accordance with the requirements of Streets and Highways Code, Section 22565 et. seq.; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed said report with the City Clerk and the City Clerk has presented said report to this City Council for consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve, order, and determine as follows: Section 1. The City Council has considered and passed on said report. Said report, as filed, is hereby approved. Said report, including any plans, specifications, estimates of costs and expenses, diagram and assessments are incorporated herein by reference and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk and may be examined by any interested persons. Reference is made to said plans and specifications for a description of the proposed improvements. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this- day of ,2001. PAUL H. RICHARDS, 11, Mayor City of Lynwood ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAVIS, III City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Joseph Y. Wang, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Lynwood Cou01018 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 WITHIN LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", AS AMENDED, (COMMENCING WITH STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 22500 ET SEQ.), AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS WHEREAS, the City Council has directed and the City Engineer has prepared and filed a report in writing containing all matters required by Council under Streets and Highways Code, Section 22565, et seq.; and WHEREAS, said report has been presented to the City Council for consideration and has been received and approved. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve, order and determine as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 as amended, commencing with Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq., the City Council of the City of Lynwood hereby declares its intention to order the levy and collection of assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within an existing assessment district designated "Lynwood Lighting Assessment District (the "District") for fiscal year 2001-2002 to pay for the costs of those existing and previously proposed improvements described as: The installation or construction and maintenance and servicing of existing and previously proposed public lighting facilities and facilities which are appurtenant thereto or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including but not limited to, electric current, repair of street light standards and fixtures and incidental costs including labor, material and equipment. Such improvements constitute the maintenance and operation of sidewalks and streets, specifically, the maintenance and operation of existing and previously proposed public lighting facilities located in and along sidewalks and streets, including street lights and traffic signals, and facilities which are appurtenant thereto or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or operation thereof, including the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain public lighting facilities and traffic signals located in and along public streets within the City; and the installation and construction of previously proposed public lighting facilities, and facilities which are appurtenant thereto or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or operation thereof, which have been or are to be paid from the proceeds of revenue bonds." The boundaries of the District are conterminous with the boundaries of the City of Lynwood as shown on the map identified as Assessment District Map No. 2001-A on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 2. Reference is hereby made to the report of the Engineer approved by Council on May 15, 2001, by a resolution, and on file in the office of the City Clerk, describing in detail the improvements to be made, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) §• COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2001. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk, City of Lynwood STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) §- COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2001. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk, City of Lynwood Cou01018 DATE: May 15, 2001 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Manager ~ ~` ~Y`~~ BY: Joseph Y. Wang, P.E., Director of Public Works`` _ ~!'.~ ^.~ Paul Nguyen, Civil Engineering Associate ~~ SUBJECT: Lynwood Landscape Maintenance Assessment District FY 2001-2002 PURPOSE: This report recommends that the City Council approve the attached Engineer's Report for Lynwood Landscape Maintenance Assessment District and recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention which sets this matter for public hearing. BACKGROUND: The Lynwood Landscape Maintenance Assessment District was first established in 1978 under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The cost of maintenance, including the assessment engineering costs and administration can be levied annually against the properties which receive the benefits, thereby relieving the General Fund of that amount. Property owners are assessed only for the benefits received. The assessments were levied as a fair and equitable way to provide funds to maintain, operate and improve the landscaped areas in the City. The plans and specifications for the District are on file with the City Clerk and the Director of Public Works. The City Council, on March 6, 2001, adopted Resolution 2001-27 proposing the formation of a Landscape Maintenance Assessment District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 192, and directed the preparation of the Engineer's Report. For fiscal year 2001-2002, the estimated cost of providing landscape maintenance is $945,400. The annual installment for Certificate of Participation, as approved by the City Council in 1992 is $246,808. Since a combined carryover from FY 2000-01 and available funds from other funding source, totaling $97,814, is projected, the revenue required for FY 2001-2002 is $1,094,394. ANAI YSIS• The current assessment rate is $1.90/F.F. for residential and commercial lots. If the City maintains these current rates for FY 2001-2002, the estimated revenue would be $1,094,394, which is sufficient to cover for all costs of the District. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 3. Adopt the attached resolution entitled:"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING THE REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, SECTION 22565 ET SEQ., AS ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 6, 2001, RELATING TO LYNWOOD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT"; and AGENllA ITEA 1~ 4. Adopt the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 WITHIN LYNWOOD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", AS AMENDED, (COMMENCING WITH STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 22500 ET SEQ.), AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS" Cou01016 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ENGINEER'S REPOR Pursuant to the LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (DIVISION 15, PART 2) STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE STATE OF CALIFORNIA May 15, 2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD Prepared by: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. City Engineer 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, California 90262 co~o~o~~ ENGINEER'S REPORT THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD Gentlemen: Pursuant to Resolution No. 2001-27, adopted by your Honorable Body on March fi, 2001, I have prepared the ENGINEER'S REPORT required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended, (being Division 15, Part 2, Streets and Highways Code of the State of California). This Engineer's Report contemplates the levying of an assessment to provide funds necessary to construct, install, maintain and service sidewalks, streets, and water, flood control and drainage systems and appurtenant facilities within the Landscape Maintenance District of the City of Lynwood (the "District"). The assessment will be levied against those parcels of land within said District benefiting from the improvements, as required by law. Proper construction, installation, maintenance and servicing of median islands, retention basins, street trees and other landscaped facilities provide an esthetically pleasing environment, air purification and sound attenuation. Proper maintenance of such landscaping also provides for the efficient operations of streets, sidewalks, water, flood control and drainage systems throughout the City. It enhances the overall quality of life and desirability of an area, thereby enhancing the value of each and every parcel in the District. Since the street trees and medians are evenly distributed along the public streets and other landscaped facilities are evenly distributed throughout the District, all properties within the District are located within a single zone. The front footage of each benefited property is used as the base for distributing the overall costs in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each assessable parcel from the improvements. THE ENGINEER'S REPORT Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended, it is required that an Engineer's Report be prepared and filed with the City Clerk, who in turn presents it to the City Council for its consideration. The said Engineer's Report consists of the following: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The Lynwood Landscape Maintenance District was formed and assessments first levied in 1978 following the passage of Resolution No. 78-78 by the City Council. The plans and specifications for the improvements within the District are on file with the City Clerk and Director of Public Works and are incorporated herein by reference. Engineer's Report May 15, 2001 Page 2 Landscape Maintenance for fiscal year 2001-2002 includes the following improvements: LYNWOOD CITY PARK (39 acres) Mowing, edging, weeding, irrigation, restroom maintenance, painting, fence repair, and trash pick-up. JOHN HAM PARK (10 acres) Mowing, edging, weeding, irrigation, painting, fence repair and trash pick-up. LOS AMIGOS PARK (1.75 acres) Mowing, edging, weeding, irrigation, painting, fence repair and trash pick-up. STREET MEDIAN (Long Beach Boulevard, 74,646 square feet; State Street, 170,000 square feet; Imperial Highway, 27,740 square feet; Atlantic Avenue, 94,472 square feet; Hulme Avenue 2,160 square feet; Lilita Avenue 1,620 square feet; Carlin Avenue 1,530 square feet; Los Flores Avenue 36,800 square feet; Flower Street 36,800 square feet.) Mowing, edging, irrigation, trash pick-up and eradicating pests. WATER WELLS (Six locations, 11750 square feet) Mowing, edging, weeding and irrigation. TREE TRIMMING Four year cycle general tree trimming, and in-house light tree trimming and emergency response services. A further explanation of the proposed improvements is attached as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference. 2. DIAGRAM A diagram of the District, showing the exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of any zones within the District, and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land, within the District, is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's Maps for fiscal year 2001- 2002 for a detailed description on the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels within the District. 3. ESTIMATE OF COST Maintenance and Servicing Costs The estimate of the water, electrical energy, operation and maintenance costs with respect to the District (including incidental expenses) for the one year period beginning July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002, is $945,400. A more detailed explanation of maintenance and servicing costs is attached as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference. Engineer's Report May 15, 2001 Page 3 Capital Improvement Costs There was a considerable backlog in capital improvement projects in the District. The public interest and safety required that these projects be constructed on an expedited basis. The cost of such capital improvements exceeded the amount that could be conveniently raised in a single assessment. Pursuant to Section 22662 (b) of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City of Lynwood entered into an agreement whereby District received an advance of $2,467,850 from the City of Lynwood for deposit to the improvement fund. Such advance is to be repaid to the City through the levy and collection of annual assessments for these improvements over a period of twenty (20) years commencing with fiscal year 1992-93. The annual installment is $246,808. A list of the previously approved projects and their status is attached to this report as Exhibit A. Total Assessment The total amount to be assessed with respect to the District for fiscal year 2000-2001, consisting of the maintenance and servicing costs and the capital improvement cost discussed above, plus the estimated deficit from fiscal year 1998-99 is as follows: FY 2000-2001 ASSESSMENT Maintenance and $945,400 Servicing Costs Annual Installment 246,808 (Revenue Bonds) Total Cost $1,192,208 Est. Surplus FY 2000-01 $97,814 Net Amount to be $1,094,394 assessed DISTRICT DESCRIPTION AND REVENUES There are approximately 10,055 parcels of property, with approximately 575,997 feet of front footage within the District, excluding parcels of public property, which are not assessed for the costs of improvements. DISTRICT DESCRIPTION AND COST Assessment Total Front Footage Rate Revenues 575, 997 FF $1.90/FF $1, 094, 394 Engineer's Report May 15, 2001 Page 4 4. ASSESSMENT ROLL In compliance with the above Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, copies of the County Assessor's Map and the County Tax Collector's tax rolls were used in this Engineer's Report. The assessment roll, for each parcel of land therein, shows the legal description; the County Assessor's code numbers; the assessable front footage used in calculating the assessment against the parcels and the total net assessment levied against the parcels for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The assessment roll is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and Director of Public Works, and is incorporated herein by reference. The foregoing Engineer's Report, which includes PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, the DIAGRAM ,the ASSESSMENT ROLL and the ESTIMATE OF COSTS, is presented herewith for your approval by resolution. Dated this 1St day of May, 2001. Respectfully, JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. City Engineer City of Lynwood co~o~o» LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1. Sidewalk Reconstruction 2. Cesar Chavez Ln. Improv. 3. Streetscaping 4. Landscaped Median Islands S. Tree Planting 6. Public Parks TOTAL: Cou01021 BUDGET COMPLETED, $1,000,000 100 $357,000 100 $431,400 100 $236,000 100 $105,697 100 $73,400 100 ATTACHMENT "A" City ~YNWOOD Lynwood Landscape B 2001-L Boundary liap For information on lines Or parcel, refer to plan 2001-L and Los Angeles County Assessors's Maps on file with the City Engineer. All publicity owned properties are assessment exempt From the district. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, APPROVING THE REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, SECTION 22565 ET SEQ., AS ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 6, 2001, RELATING TO LYNWOOD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council on March 6, 2001, adopted Resolution No. 2001-27, instructing the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk, a report in writing in accordance with the requirements of Streets and Highways Code, Section 22565 et. seq.; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed said report with the City Clerk and the City Clerk has presented said report to this City Council for consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve, order, and determine as follows: Section 1. The City Council has considered and passed on said report. Said report, as filed, is hereby approved. Said report, including any plans, specifications, estimates of costs and expenses, diagram and assessments are incorporated herein by reference and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk and may be examined by any interested persons. Reference is made to said plans and specifications for a description of the proposed improvements. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 2001. Paul H. Richards II, Mayor City of Lynwood ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Lynwood Ralph W. Davis, III City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Lynwood Cou00028 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 WITHIN LYNWOOD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", AS AMENDED, (COMMENCING WITH STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 22500 ET SEQ.), AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS WHEREAS, the City Council has directed and the City Engineer has prepared and filed a report in writing containing all matters required by Council under Streets and Highways Code, Section 22565, et seq.; and WHEREAS, said report has been presented to the City Council for consideration and has been received and approved. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does hereby resolve, order and determine as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 as amended, commencing with Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq., the City Council of the City of Lynwood hereby declares its intention to order the levy and collection of assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within an existing assessment district designated "Lynwood Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (the "District") for fiscal year 2001-2002 to pay for the costs of those existing and previously proposed improvements described as: The installation, maintenance, and servicing of existing and previously proposed landscaping and appurtenant facilities within parks and landscaped areas within public rights-of-way and City owned property in the City of Lynwood. Such improvements include the maintenance and operation of sidewalks, streets, and water, flood control and drainage systems, specifically the maintenance and operation of landscaping and appurtenant facilities in and along streets and sidewalks, the maintenance and operation of parks, including appurtenant facilities, which serve as natural retention and drainage systems as required by the area's Master Storm Drain Plan, and the maintenance and operation of landscaped areas adjacent to and appurtenant to water well sites; and the installation of previously proposed landscaping and appurtenant facilities within parks and landscaped areas within public rights-of--way and City-owned property in the City which have been paid or are to be paid form the proceeds of revenue bonds. The boundaries of the District are conterminous with the boundaries of the City of Lynwood as shown on the map identified as Assessment District Map No. 2001-L on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 2. Reference is hereby made to the report of the Engineer approved by Council on May 15, 2001, by a resolution, and on file in the office of the City Clerk, describing in detail the improvements to be made, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. Section 3. Notice is hereby given that on June 19, 2001, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California, is the date, hour and place fixed for the hearing of protests and objections by the City Council to the levy and collection of the proposed assessments against the lots and parcels of land within the District for fiscal year 2001-2002. Any and all persons having any protest or objection to the proposed improvements, the extent of the assessment district, or the levy and collection of the proposed assessments may appear before the City Council at said hearing and show cause why said improvements should not be carried out and the proposed assessment and .-~. COUNTY OF LOS ANG~~ES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2001. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) } §. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) City Clerk, City of Lynwood I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2001. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Cou01016 City Clerk, City of Lynwood ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2000-02 WITH RESPECT TO TRACT 8716, LOTS 188 THROUGH 196; ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 6189 PAGE 13 PARCELS 012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 038 AND 902; LOCATED AT 4348, 4356 AND 4360 BREWSTER AVENUE; 11666, 11670 AND 11676 FIRST AVENUE AND THREE (3) VACANT CITY OWNED PARCELS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FERNWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND THE ALLEY WEST OF ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA FROM P-1 (PARKING) TO R-1 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL). WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council did pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on April 17, 2001 on a proposed Zone Change with respect to the above identified subject properties and application; and WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environment, and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for the proposal, which is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council determined that Single Family Residential zoning of these properties would be consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan; .and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council determined that R-1 zoning is consistent with the character of the neighborhood in the vicinity; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood City Council has determined the zone change will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare citizens working or residing in the vicinity. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, at a duly noticed public hearing approved Zone Change No. 2000-02 pursuant to Resolution 2795 on October 10, 2000. Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed Zone Change will be consistent with the objectives and the development policies of the City of Lynwood. B. The proposed Zone Change will not unreasonable constrain the use of property by landowners and developers. C. The proposed Zone Change will not adversely affect the General Plan. D. The Single Family Residential zoning designation of the properties would be compatible with surrounding land uses. E. A Zone Change from P-1 (Parking) to R-1 (Single-Family Residential) is consistent with goals and policies of the General Plan. H:\WORDFlLE\PLAANING~RE50gbrd,council.ae200O02.doc AG4EN1~ ITE~+I 1 I s F. An R-1 zoning designation would make eight (8) nonconforming properties conforming. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determination, hereby approves Zone Change No. 2000- 02. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADDOPTED this day of .2001. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHAN K. THEVER, City Attorney x:~wo~i~rw~n:cv~sosea.~a.~zooo~oz.aa PAUL H. RICHARDS II, Mayor City of Lynwood RALPH W. DAMS III, City Manager City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: GARY CHICOTS, Director of Community Development Department 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )SS I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the day of .2001. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City Clerk, City of Lynwood STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Ordinance No. on file in my office and that said ordinance was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this day of .2001. City Clerk H: ~ W ORDFlLE\PU tJKMOVtESOSbrd.oourci I.~e3000-02.doc 3 ~ ~~ i WARRANT DATE: 05-15-01 PREPAIDS AND VOIDS WARRANT# AMOUNT " 103804 103810 103811 103812 103813 103814 103815 10381b 103817 103616 103819 103820 103821 103822 103823 103824 ' 103825 i 103826 103827 103828 103829 103830 103831 103832 103833 103834 103835 10383b 103837 i 103838 103834 103840 103841 103842 103843 103$44 ' 103845 103646 103847 103848 103849 103650 103851 ~ 103852 103853 103854 103855- 103856 103857 4950.00 1155.73 454. 3U 4950 Ofi 4996.00 523.79 945.54 477,50 427,00 48.00 100.00 660.00 280. I 1 3066. 40 0. 00 4529.44 330. 00 32.72 5000.00 867.72 66 83 50.65 200,00 937.44 112.86 14318.77 3975.00 510.91 2046.16 49781.77 33039. 83 2082.05 1203.84 275.00 356.40 104.30 296.00 712.00 ISb 00 237,38 59.35 200.00 500. 00 1200.00 575.00 BOB. 70 2500. 00 5000. 00 4950, 00 VENDOR# VENDOR NAME clrv of LvNwaoD W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R 3668 JACKSON & ASSOCIATES 208 PETTY CASH - CHECKING 4283 THYRAS CATERING i< CONCESSIONS 99999 LYNWOOD GIRLS BASKETBALL A550C 99999 USA TROPHIES 4281 ALLIANT FOOD SERVICE 4303 GENERAL DINGING CORP. 1285 DYRD INDUSTRIAL ELEC 3718 DAVID YOUNG 99499 JAVIER GUTIERREZ 4293 JOHN H. FAIRE 99999 GFOA 3553 NEXTEL COMMUNICATION 4232 ACCENET INC. 99999 SPOILED 3931 THE LIGHTHOUSE 99999 CAROLINA DE JESUS 99999 AT g, T -ROADBAND 3583 RITA CONSTRUCTION 4277 SIERRA SPRINGS 3356 ATY~T WIRELESS INC. 951 PREFERRED DELIVERY SYSTEMS 3889 EDGARDO DELMORE JURADO 54 COMP TON DLUEPRINT ?~ SUPPLY 3356 ATR<T WIRELESS INC. 3842 JOHN DEERE CORALEIGH NC 0154 DE5S CONSTRUCTION 3694 AT?<T 201 PACIFIC BELL 246 SO CALIF EDISON COMPANY 246 50 CALIF EDISON COMPANY 37 MBNA AMERICAN DUSINE5S CARD 1740 OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 99999 CELSOC 243 L F~ M PRINTING 99999 IDEA ART 99999 JOSEPH STANFORD 1254 JOSE LUIS ESPINOZA 99999 JUMP 4 FUN 4179 OVINTEX WIRELESS 4179 OUINTEX WIRELESS 3866 PAUL ULLOM 1012 MOD SYSTEMS 1012 MOD SYSTEMS 3923 PC ZONE DUSINE5S SOLUTION 99999 ACCURATE IMAGING SUPPLY - 850 BEVAN THOMAS 3668 JACKSON °< ASSOCIATES 3668 JACKSON &~ ASSOCIATES DESCRIPTION PAGE: 1 INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT MITIGATION SVC5. OS-15-01 REIMDURSEMENT 05-15-01 CATERING SVC5. OS-15-O1 TICKETS 05-15-01 TROPHIES 05-15-Oi CATERING SVGS. OS-15-O1 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 05-IS-01 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES OS-15-01 CONSULTING SVC5. OS-15-O1 REFUND/PARKING 05-15-01 ENTERTAINMENT SVC5. 05-15-01 REG/PYGATT OS-15-O1 TELEPHONE SVGS. 05-15-01 COMPUTER SVC5. OS-15-O1 SPOILED 05-15-DI OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-01 REIMDURSEMENT 05-15-OS CA-LE SVGS. OS-15-01 CONSTRUCTION SVC5. 05-15-01 DRINKING WATER 5Y5'fEM p5-15-01 TELEPHONE SVGS. 05-15-01 DELIVERY SVGS. OS-15-O1 ENTERTAINMENT 5VCS. 05-15-01 -LUEPRINT SVC5. 05-IS-O1 TELEPHONE SVC5. 05-15-01 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 05-15-01 CONSTRUCTION SVGS. OS-15-O1 TELEPHONE SVGS. 05-15-01 TELEPHONE 5VCS. OS-15-01 LIGHTS & POWER OS-15-O1 LIGHTS g, POWER SVC5. 05-15-01 -ANKCARD CHARGES 05-15-01 SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM OS-15-O1 REG./PAUL NGIiYEN 05-15-p1 PRINTING SERVICES 05-15-01 OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 TRACK ~~ FIELD SET-UP 5VCS OS-15-p1 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 05-15-01 RENTAL 5VCS. OS-15-O1 TELEPHONE SERVICES 05-15-01 TELEPHONE SERVICES OS-15-01 PROFESSIONAL SVC5, 05-15-01 RENTAL SVGS. 05-IS-O1 RENTAL SVGS. 05-15-01 COMPUTER SUPPLIES OS-15-O1 OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-IS-O1 CONSULTING 5VCS. 05-15-01 REPORTING SVC5. OS-IS-O1 MITIGATION 5VCS. 05-15-D1 4950.00 1155.73 454.30 4950.00 4996.00 523. 79 945. 54 477. 50 427. 00 48.00 100. 00 660. 00 280. 11 3068. 40 0. 00 4529.44 330. 00 32.72 5000. 00 867.72 66. B3 50.65 200. 00 937. 44 112. 86 14318,77 3975,00 510.91 2046. 16 49781.77 33039. 83 2082.05 1203. Bq 275.00 356. 40 104.30 296.00 712.00 15b 00 237 38 59. 35 200.00 500.00 1200.00 575.00 808.70 2500. 00 5000. 00 4950.00 WARRANT PREPAIDS WARRANT# DATE: 05-15-01 AND VOIDS AMOUNT VENDOR# C I T Y of W ARRAN T VENDOR NAME L Y N W O O D R E G I S T E R DESCRIPTION NV DATE PAGE: 2 INVOICE AMOUNT 103858 43 . 2D 3484 LQMITA FLORIST ~ GIFT SHOP FLORAL SVCS. 05-15-01 43. 20 103859 813 .00 543 UEE-MAR, INC. 7EMPDRARY SVCS, 05-15-OS 813. 00 103860 45 .00 436 THE MAGIC ROSE FLORAL SVCS. OS-15-01 45. 00 103861 141 .6° 810 GLOflAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES COMPUTER SUPPLIES 05-15-01 141. 69 103862 169. 00 1254 JOSE LUIS ESPINOZA PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES OS-15-01 169. 00 103863 250. 81 0118 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE COFFEE SUPPLIES OS-15-01 250. 01 103864 351. 00 164 LYNGATE PRINTING CO. PRINTING SERVICES 05-IS-O1 351. 00 103865 140. 40 3359 JERRY'S SIGNS & DESIGN SIGNS 05-15-01 140. 4D 103866 7200. 00 3583 RITA CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION SVCS. OS-15-01 7200. 00 103867 ]24. 52 1107 DICK'S LOCK r KEY LOCK b KEY SVCS. OS-15-O1 124. 52 103868 4935. 00 4256 TRUE GREEN LANDCARE LANDSCAPING SVCS. 05-IS-O1 4935: 00 103869 4791. 11 4161 UNITED PUMPING SERVICE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL CLEAN 05-15-01 4791. 11 103870 845. DO 1209 STAR PHOTO UNLIMITED PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES OS-15-O1 845. 00 103871 270. 00 99999 L. A. COUNTY COMr1I5SI0N ON AGING TICKETS 05-IS-01 270. 00 103872 350. 00 38 JOHN 50LTIS KARATE INSTRUCTOR 05-15-01 354. 00 103873 2609 64 3834 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 05-15-01 2609. 64 103874 1149. 50 99999 LEONILA ONTIVEROS PROPERTY ACQUISITION 05-15-01 1149. 50 103875 125. 00 99999 SCAN NATOA REG1J. HOWARD 05-15-01 125. 00 103876 5000. OD 3583 RITA CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION SVCS. 05-15-01 5000. 00 103877 30D0. 00 4270 GOLDEN WES'i ROOFING CONSTRUCTION SVCS. 05-15-01 3000. 00 103078 2200 00 4163 SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION SVCS. 05-IS-O1 2200. 00 103879 1511 03 99999 CADLE ?< WIRELESS TELEPHONE SERVICES OS-iS-O1 1511. 63 103880 3097. 25 3751 WE TIP, INC. MEMBERSHIP DUES 05-15-01 3097. 25 103881 1450. 00 3867 MUSIC MAKERS °< MORE ENTERTAINMENT SVCS. OS-15-O1 1450. 00 103882 102. 61 99994 REDDY AWARDS INC. AWARDS OS-15-O1 102. 61 103883 113. 40 99999 JULIA A QUINONES GIFT BASKETS OS-15-01 113. 40 103884 322131. 47 205 PAYROLL FUND PAYROLL FUND 05-15-D1 322131. 47 103885 1250. 00 326 QUINN'S EXTERMINATING EXTERMINATING SVGS. 05-IS-01 1250, 00 103886 75787. 95 1115 P. E. R. S.-HEALTH PERS/MEDICAL OS-15-Df 75787. 95 103887 9000. 00 9441 J. BROOKS CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION SVCS. 05-15-01 9000. 00 103B88 275050. 00 4242 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPT. FIRE PROTECTION SV{;S. OS-15-01 275050. 00 103889 275050. 00 4242 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPT. FIRE PROTECTION SV{;S. OS-IS-01 275050. 00 103890 1100, 00 94999 MARRIDTT LODGING/PYGATT DS-15-O1 1100. 00 103891 2000. 00 4307 POWER MU51C BAND/EDGAR JURADD ENTERTAINMENT SVCS. OS-15-D1 200D. 00 103957 100. 00 99999 USC BAA DINNER TICKETS OS-15-O1 100. 00 103958 27. 00 99999 STATE OF EQUALIZATION FILING FEE OS-IS-O1 27. 00 103959 0. 00 99999 SPOILED SPOILED OS-15-O1 0. 00 103960 0 00 94999 SPOILED SPOILED OS-15-01 0. 00 103961 0, 00 99999 SPOILED SPOILED OS-15-O1 0. 00 TOTAL PREPAYS: 1162377.67 TOTAL VOIDS: 0.00 TOTAL 1162377.67 f` C I T Y of L Y N W O O D WARRANT DATE' 05-15-01 W A R RAN T R E G I S T E R PAGE: 3 WARRANT# AMOUNT VENDOR# VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT 103892 0. 78 1289 AQC HARDWARE OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-01 0. 78 103893 185. 83 445 ACADEMY POOLS OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-OS 185. 83 103894 7948. 00 4304 ACCIDENT RESEARCH AND D IOME. PROFESSIONAL SVGS. 05-IS-01 7948. 00 103895 37 OD 682 ADT SECURITY SERVICES ALARM SVGS. OS-15-OS 37, 00 103896 500. 00 4227 A.F G COACH TRANSPORTATION SVGS. 05-15-01 500. 00 103897 25. 00 3756 SAL ALATORRE TRAFFIC COMM 4126 05-15-01 25. 00 103898 25. 00 3310 KATHERINE L. AMEV RECREATION COMM 4118 05-15-01 25. 00 103899 119. 28 4086 ARCH PAGER SVGS. OS-15-01 119, 28 103900 3500. 00 4233 ASAP ENGINEERING ENGINEERING SVGS. OS-15-O1 3500. 00 103901 337. 94 99999 AT & T WIRELESS TELEPHONE SVGS. 05-15-01 337. 94 103902 25 00 20 YOLANDA QAY5 RECREATION COMM 4118 OS-15-01 25. 00 103903 25. 00 2865 JOHN DEIMER TRAFFIC COMM 4126 05-15-01 25. 00 103904 1770. 21 788 DISHOP CO. OPERATIN6 SUPPLIES OS-15-O1 1770. 21 103905 181. B2 3905 DOB HTGK5 TURF EOUIPT. OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 181. 82 103906 6350. 00 4257 QONDLOGI5TIX REDATE REPORT OS-IS-01 6350. 00 103907 25. 00 1578 MARGARET LaftIGHT TRAFFIC COMM 4/26 45-15-01 25. 00 103908 875 73 4017 CDN DATA FORMS INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 875. 73 103904 38867. 22 822 CIVIL WORKS CORP, CONSTRUCTION SVGS. OS-15-O1 38867. 22 103910 4750. 00 3560 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS CLAIM PREPARATION 05-15-01 4750. 00 103911 13. 00 1005 COUNTY REGISTRAR-RECORDER LIEN RELEASING SVGS. OS-15-pi 13. 00 103912 260, 41. 1338 CQUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PEST CONTROL SVGS. 05-15-01 260. 41 103913 53?653. 48 1032 COUNTY DF I_05 ANGELES LAW ENFORCEMENT SVf.5. OS-15-OS 537653. 48 103914 75. 00 1036 VERNA GULP WOMEN'S COMM 4/01 05-15-01 75. 00 103915 2358. 60 742 llANGELO CO OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 2358, 60 103916 626. 50 1179 DAPEER °: RO5ENBLIT LEGAL FEES 05-15-01 626. 50 i 103917 6666. SD 939 DATA PLUS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. TELEPHONE SERVICES 05-15-01 6666. 50 103918 50. 00 3511 DATAOUICK LIEN INQUIRIES OS-15-O1 50. 00 103919 4786 ?b 357 DAVE DANG ASSOCIATES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-01 4786. 76 103920 237. 50 543 DEE-MAR. INC. TEMPORARY SVGS. 05-IS-O1 2237 $0 103921 114. 61 402.9 DEL AMO DODGE AUTO PARTS 05-15-01 119. 61 103922 215. 00 0187 DIAL MOQILE COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR SVGS. OS°15-01 215. 00 103923 265. 20 1.107 DICK'S LOCK °< KEY LOCK °< KEY SVGS. OS-15-01 265. 20 103924 1205, 27 1164 DISCOUNT RADIA70R SERVICE AUTD PARTS 05-15-01 1205. 27 103925 184625, 56 4'253 EC CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION SVGS. OS-15-01 184625. 56 103926 90. DU 3768 FALCON AS50C. INC. ADVERTISING SVGS 05-15-01 90 00 103927 25. 00 91 ANN A. FIELDS RECREATION CDMM 4115 OS-15-01 25. 00 103928 89. b3 3534 FORD ELECTRONICS OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-01 89. 63 ~ 103929 385. 00 35 G ?< G AUTO UPHOLSTERY AUTD PARTS 05-15-01 385. 00 103930 1878. 85 917 GQS LINEN LINEN SVGS. D5-15-01 1578. 85 103931 30. 70 4030 GEORGE CHEVROLET AVTO PARTS OS-15-01 30. 70 103932 4500. 00 99999 GEORGE GONZALEZ REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT 05-15-01 4500 00 103933 25. 00 109 NANCY GILPEN PERSONNEL COMM 4/14 05-15-01 25 OD 103934 153. 29 1294 GOLDEN WEST PIPE b. SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 153. 29 103935 702. 73 3368 HAN50N AGGREGATES WEST. INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-O1 702, 73 103936 2511. 16 913 HILLYARD OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-O1 2511. 16 103937 871. 33 4039 NOME DEPOT OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-01 871. 33 103938 71. 30 051 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS PAIPJT SUPPLIES 05-15-01 71. 30 103939 286. 00 4296 ICOM TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION SVGS 05-15-01 286. 00 103940 259. 16 1331 INDEPENDENT COMPUTER CITY OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 259. 16 C I T Y of L Y N W O O WARRANT DATE: 05-15-01 W ARRAN T R E G I 5 T PAGE: 4 WARRANT# AMOUNT VENDDR# VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT 103941 561 .20 940 JAY'S CATERING CATERING SVGS,- ~ 05-15-01 561. 20 103942 25 .00 3300 RODERT JOHN5TON PERSONNEL COMM 4/19 OS-15-01 25. 00 103943 717 .11 136 JONES LUMDER OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-O1 717. 11 103944 95 .00 4049 JORGE 1. WEDSTER DEE HIVE REMOVAL 05-i5-01 95. 00 103945 264 .38 140 KEYSTONE FORD AUTO PARTS OS-IS-01 264. 38 103946 500 .OG 36 KOPPL COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-01 500. 00 103947 2470 .00 474 L N A TRUCKING CONCRETE REMOVAL OS-15-01 2470. 00 103948 899 .70 0125 L ~ N UNIFORMS UNIFORM RENTALS OS-1S-01 899. 70 103949 457 .26 4112 L. A. COUNTY OF PUDLIC WORKS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT. OS-15-O1 457. 2b 103950 6720, 77 891 COUNTV qF L. A. SHERIFF'S DEPT. LAW ENFORCEMENT SVGS. OS-IS-01 6720. 77 103951 1350. 00 99999 LAURA TORRES REFUNDADLE DEPOSIT 05-IS-01 1350. 00 103952 25. 00 1062 GEORGE LEWSS PERSONNEL COMM 4119 OS-15-O1 25. 00 103953 75. 00 1900 MARY SUE LEWIS WOMENS' COMM. 2/01 05-IS-41 75. 00 ~ 103954 25. 00 153 ARNOLD LITKE PERSONNEL COMM 4/19 OS-15-01 25. 00 103955 25, 00 2097 JOSEPHINE LITTLEJOHN PERSONNEL COMM 4/19 05-15-01 25. 00 103956 270. 27 1238 LONG BEACH UN I{°ORM UNIFORM PURCHASE 05-15-01 270. 27 103962 25. 00 3330 ERNE5T0 S. LOPEZ TRAFFIC COMM 4/26 05-15-01 25. 00 103963 21 29 1792 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 21. 29 103964 151. 54 99999 LUNA"5 FANTASY FLORIST ~ GIFTS FLORAL SVGS. 05-15-Oi 151. 54 103965 115. 91 164 LYNGATE PRINTING CO. PRINTING SERVICES OS-15-O1 115. 91 103966 493. 82 170 LYNWODD RENTAL CENTER RENTAL SVC5. OS-15-O1 493. 82 103467 331. 30 4027 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGR 05-15-01 331. 30 103968 48. 00 99999 MARILYN HERNANDEZ PARKING/REFUND OS-15-O1 48. 00 103969 75 00 1039 DELLA MAZZIOTTI WOMEN'S GOMM 4/01 OS-15-O1 75. 00 103970 1040. 40 4146 MITCHELL PERSONNEL 5VC TEMPORARY SVC5. OS-15-01 1040. 40 103971 901, 19 827 M R.< M AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS OS-IS-O1 901. 19 103972 1969. 90 99999 MODERN OFFICE OFFICE FURNITURE 05-15-01 1969. 90 103973 1540. 0() 4047 NATIONWIDE ENVIROMENTAL SERVIC DUS STOP CLEANING OS-15-O1 1540. 00 103974 700. 00 743 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES, INC. SEWER CLEANING 05-15-01 700. 00 103975 14342. 94 973 NATIONWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL SVGS. STREET SWEEPING SVGS. 05-IS-O1 14342 94 103976 25. 00 197 BARDARA NEWTON RECREATION COMM 4/16 OS-15-O1 25. 00 103977 195. 00 4230 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SVGS PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS OS-15-01 195. 00 103978 69. 55 3834 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 05-IS-01 69. 55 103979 3716. 1b 1132 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES OS-15-OI 3716. 16 103480 335. 7b 3747 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ADVERTISING SVGS. 05-15-OS 335. 7b 103981 75. 00 1040 ETHEL PACHECD WOMEN'S COMM 3/01 OS-15-O1 75, 00 103982 1361. 88 202 PAGEANTRY PRODUCTIONS AWARDS OS-15-01 1361. 68 103983 142. 00 49999 PC WAREHOUSE OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 142. 00 103984 312. 00 479 PENHALL COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 312. 00 103485 8567. 76 0157 DRENDA J. PETERSON PHOTOGRAPHY SVGS. 05-15-02 8567. 76 103986 376. 39 371 PITNEY OOWES POSTAGE SVC5. 05-IS-O1 376 39 103987 1770. 00 4130 POSITIVE IMAGE COMMUNITY SVGS. 05-15-Oi 177G 00 103988 77. 22 605 PRAXAIR DISTRIDUTION OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-OS 77. 22 103989 1952. 00 4131 PROJECT IMPACT COMMUNITY SVC5. OS-15-O1 1952. 00 103990 145. 98 1084 OVALITY AUTO AUTO PARTS OS-15-O1 145. 98 103991 460. 86 3521 R E DRID / 50, CAL. DIST. OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-O1 460, 86 103992 1621. 00 221 RAPID PUDLI5HING ADVERTISING SVC5. OS-15-01 1621. 00 103993 162. 76 4083 RICE & SONS LOCM. ?x KEY SVGS. 05-15-01 152. 76 103994 1165. 00 99999 RICKEY SWIFT REFUNDADLE DEPOSIT OS-15-O1 1165. OU C I T Y of L Y N W O O D WARRANT DATE: OS-15-O1 W ARRAN T R E G I S T E R PAGE: 5 WARRANT# AMOUNT VENDOR# VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT 103995 8813 .49 1230 S g~ J SUPPLY CD. OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-01 8813. 49 103996 38448 .76 005 SHAH K THEVER ?< ASSOCIATES LEGAL FEES 05-15-01 38448. 7b 103997 1580 .38 1159 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY OPERATING'5UPPLIES 05-15-01 1580. 38 10399E 19 .67 446 SOUTH GATE CAMERA +`JPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 19. 67 103999 65 .62 3549 SPARKLETTS OFFICE SUPPLIES OS-15-01 85. 62 104000 420 .00 4028 SPONSORED MARKETING INSURANCE CAFETERIA PLAN OS-15-O1 420. 00 104001 84 .57 1022 SYSCO OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 84. 57 104002 2593 .95 666 TAJ OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES OS-15-O1 2593. 95 104003 200 .00 0139 WOODROW TAYLOR HEARING EXAMINER OS-15-O1 200. 00 104004 1712 .72 264 TEXACO INC. GASOLINE SVCS. Q5-15^O1 1712. 72 104005 1023 .66 3931 THE LIGHTHOUSE AUTO PARTS OS-15-O1 1023. 66 104p06 336 .96 265 DILL THOMAS PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 05-15-01 336. 9b 104007 177 .12 4026 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR ELEVATOR SVCS. 05-15-01 177. 12 104008 116 .00 239 TRENCH SHORING OPERATING 5UPPLIE5 05-15-01 116. 00 104009 4935 ,00 4256 TRUE GREEN LANDCARE TREE TRIMMING SVCS. 05-15-01 4935. 00 104010 611 .24 1145 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS OPERATING 5UPPLIE5 05-15^O1 611. 24 104011 212 .12 3697 UNI50URCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 212. 12 104012 2627. 65 100 UNITED RENTALS RENTAL SVCS, OS-1S-pl 2627. 65 104013 175733. 74 4101 USS CAL DUItDERS~ INC. CONSTRUCTION SVCS. 05-15-01 175733. 74 104014 1245. 71 282 VIKING OFFICE PROD. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OS-15-O1 1245. 71 104015 4974. 49 284 VIRCO MFG OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-01 4974. 49 104016 860. 00 4231 VULCAN MATERIALS CO. DEDRIS REMOVAL 05-15-01 860. 00 104017 68. 00 191 WAVE COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING SVCS. 05-15-01 68. 00 104018 290, 29 1058 WA%IE OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-15-01 290. 29 104019 115. 03 4002 CHRISTOPHER WEDER VIDEO PREPARATION SVCS. 05-15-01 115. 03 104020 25. 00 1604 RODNEY WHITE TRAFFIC COMM. 4/26 DS-15-01 25. 00 104021 1339. 13 4128 WORLD LITERACY CRUSADE COMMUNITY SVCS. 05-15-01 1339. 13 104p22 785. 00 4050 WORK STRIPING R< MARKING 5ERV CONTNACTUAL SVCS: - OS-15-O1 785. 00 104023 651. 52 308 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-15-01 651. 52 2289819.14 2289819.14 PREPAID: 103809-103891103957-103958 SPOILED: 103959-103961 VOIDS: ANDREA L. HOOPER CITY CLERK Date: May 15, 2001 To: Mayor and City Council members From: Ralph W. Davis, III, City Manag By: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk cam" SUBJECT: Street Closure -Block Party COMMENTS: Denisha Smith is requesting a street closure at: Longvale between Cedar and Virginia on: September 29, 2001 for a Block Party/Birthday Party. RECOMMENDATION: That Council review and direct staff accordingly. At~E13I.?,A I'Z'~~[ 1~ city ~ ~YN~OOD ~ c~ CtEy utAeeEtng CkaQQenges ~' (() 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOO, CALIFORNIA 90262 (310) 603-0220 CITY OF LYNWOOD APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT 11330 BULLlS ROAG LYNWOOD CA 90262 310-603-022 G APPLICANT INFORMATION: NAME ~%I`l,(,~~j r l.~ ~ F'Yl I r V 1 CDL#: A ~(pv'S ~ PHO ADDRESS OCCUPATION CITY 7,33 3,v g£~•~-35~, P 9 ra-~ a NUMBER OF PERSONS EMPLOYED. SBE: !State Board of Eauauzauon Numoer~ EVENT INFORMATION TYPE OF PERMIT REQUESTED: DATE(SI OF EVENT S'~.aI..Q,f'Y~ If3~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~~;~ ~ HOURS OF OPERATION (~>>rr~ _ In~~t'~r~~l ADDRESS OF PROPOSED EVENT LOCATION: ~ ITT ~ ~ 1c / ~+~ ~~-~. ~nl SPECIFIC AREA DESIGNATED FOR EVENT: ~j~ r7~ ~ `~'~ IS STREET CLOSURE BEING REQUESTED: YES NO (CIRCLE ONE) CIF YES BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FO~~R,~ EVENT~i ND CL SURE:) I ( .Z Y Q~ 1 '~ l1U r" ~ Yl + P ,l ' f VI~C~IF ~t;~. • ~ ~ ~c-• r;ta YI iF INDOORS. APPROXIMATE TOTAL GROUND FL R AREA OF STRUCTURE: riAVE YOU MADE AN APPLICATION FOR THIS TYPE OF PERMIT BEFORE? YES I~ YES WHERE AND WHEN IS THIS AFOR-PROFIT OR ON-PROFIT EVENT? (CIRCLE ONE) IF THIS IS ANON-PROFIT EVENT OR A CERTAIN PORTION OF THE PROCEEDS BENEFIT A NON-PROFIT AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION, PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: NAME OF ORGANIZATION BEING BENEFITED. ~ w~~ STATE NON-PROFIT NUMBER' ' ADDRESS OF ORGANIZATION: IS A WAIVER OF FEES BEING REQUESTED IF YES. EXPLAIN YES NO A NEGOTIATED PERCENTAGE OF THE PROCEEDS IS REQUESTED TO BE DONATED TO THE CITY. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE ANO _ COMPLETE AND THAT ANY MISSTATEMENTS OF MATERIAL FACTS WILL CAUSE A ~Y E C t ~ Rp~~TURE OF FEES AND DENIAL OF PERM ~. '+ y 1 CITY OF LYNWOOfj ~~~ I 1 l•L f ~ vl ~ ~~L51 0~.'~' I CITY CLERKS OFFICE , SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE ~~ 7~R~4~»tlltl~rlt2t~314i$t6 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE ACCEPTANCE OF THIS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW DOES NOT IMPLY APPROVAL. THIS PERMIT REQUIRES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED ACCORDINGLY. RECEIVED MAY - 3 2001 PHONE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES _ ~. ~. FOR CITY USE ONLY CITY CLERK.- CONFLICT WITH PRIOR APPROVED EVENTS: YES NO IF CONFLICTS EXIST. DESCRIBE: EVENT DATE APPLICANT FIRE DEPT APPROVED/NO CONDITIONS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS: COMMENTS/CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: SIGNATURE DATE I -u.~~ ~;~~~ '°"'r~'= ..'"T APPROVED/NO CONDITIONS PPROVED WITH CONDlTION~ COMMENTS:/CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: // S ~~` APPROVED/NO CONDITIONS APPROVED W1TH CONDITIONS: COMMENTS./CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: SIGNATURE DATE COMM DEV DEPT. APPROVED/NO CONDITIONS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS' COMMENTS:/CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: SIGNATURE DATE RECREATION DEPT. APPROVEDINO CONDITIONS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS: COMMENTS:/CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: SIGNATURE DATE APPROVED/DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL ON: APPLICANT NOTIFIED: ~,~- . ,,,,COUNTY OF LOS ANGELE°'` SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT "A tradition of Service" Since 1850 CONTRACT CITY t+rsorvtxpiosive, uep., B-II $69.60 $4.18 $73.78 ArosNExplosive, Sergeant 69.65 4.18 73.83 Deputy, Generalist 48.37 2.90 51.27 Deputy, Bonus I 52.00 3.12 55.12 Deputy, Bonus II 62.70 3.76 66.46 r CLEB 062598 HOURLY RATES for LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 AS PUBLISHED BY THE AUDITOR-CONTROLLER